Fiscal Year 1995
F 
C C 
* C* * 
* * A 
: *g 00 3, 
SI 
d s i

P 
I' 
REPLY TO 
ATTENTION OF 
0 2 MAY 1997 
Honorable Albert Gore, Jr. 
President of the Senate 
Washington, D. C. 20510-0010 
Dear Mr. President: 
I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on 
Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1995 in accordance 
with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1888 and 
Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986. 
This volume of field reports contains narrative 
summaries and statistics on water resources development 
projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has 
been activity between October 1, 1994, and September 30, 
1995. 
H. Vartin Lancaster 
Assistant Secretary of the Army 
(Civil Works) 
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY 
CIVIL WORKS 
108 ARMY PENTAGON 
WASHINGTON DC 20310-0108

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY 
CIVIL WORKS 
108 ARMY PENTAGON 
WASHINGTON DC 20310-0108 
02 MAY 7 REPLY TO 
ATTENTION OF 
Honorable Newt Gingrich 
Speaker of the House 
of Representatives 
Washington, D. C. 20515-6501 
Dear Mr. Speaker: 
I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on 
Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1995 in accordance 
with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1888 and 
Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986.
This volume of field reports contains narrative 
summaries and statistics on water resources development 
projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has 
been activity between October 1, 1994, and September 30, 
1995. 
H. Martin Lancaster 
Assistant Secretary of the Army 
(Civil Works)

TABLE OF CONTENTS 
Chapter 
New England Division .... ............................... 1-1 
North Atlantic Division 
New York, NY, District .................................. 2-1 
Philadelphia, PA, District .... ................................ 3-1 
Baltimore, MD, District ... ............................... 4-1 
Norfolk, VA, District . ... ............................... 5-1 
South Atlantic Division 
Wilmington, NC, District .... ................................ 6-1 
Charleston, SC, District ... ............................... 7-1 
Savannah, GA, District ... ............................... 8-1 
Jacksonville, FL District .... .............................. 9-1 
M obile, AL, District ...................... . ............ 10-1 
Lower Mississippi Valley Division 
New Orleans, LA, District .... ................................ 11-1 
Vicksburg, M S, District .................................... 12-1 
Memphis, TN, District ................................. 13-1 
St. Louis, M O, District .................................... 14-1 
Ohio River Division 
Nashville, TN, District ................................. 15-1 
Louisville, KY, District ... ............................... 16-1 
Huntington, VW , District ............................... 17-1 
Pittsburgh, PA, District ................................ 18-1 
Ohio River .............. ....... .. ........ 19-1 
North Central Division 
Buffalo, NY, District .................................. 20-1 
Detroit, MI, District ................................... .. 21-1 
Chicago, IL, District ... ............................... 22-1 
Rock Island, IL, District . ........................... 23-1 
St. Paul, MN, District .................................... .. 24-1 
Mississippi River between Missouri River 
and M inneapolis, MN .................................. 25-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1995 
Chapter 
.................................. .................................. 
Missouri River Division 
Omaha NE, District 
Kansas City, MO, District 
Southwestern Division 
Little Rock, AR, District 
Tulsa, OK, District 
Fort Worth, TX, District 
Galveston, TX, District 
Albuquerque, NM, District 
South Pacific Division 
Los Angeles, CA, District 
San Francisco, CA, District 
Sacramento, CA, District 
California Debris Commission 
Pacific Ocean Division 
North Pacific Division 
Portland, OR, District 
Seattle, WA, District 
Walla Walla, WA, District 
Alaska, AK, District 
2b-1 
27-1 
28-1 
27-1 
28-1 
29-1 
30-1 
33-1 
34-1 
35-1 
35-1-A 
36-1 
37-1 
38-1 
39-1 
40-1 
Mississippi River Commission ......................... 
Construction Engineering Research Laboratory ............ 
Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory ......... 
Waterways Experiment Station ......................... 
Engineer Topographic Laboratories ...................... 
Water Resources Support Center ....................... 
Permanent International Association 
of Navigation Congresses ........................... 
Support for Other Agencies ............................ 
Investigation of Projects Under Federal Power Act ......... 
ii 
41-1 
42-1 
43-1 
44-1 
45-1 
46-1 
47-1 
48-1 
49-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS 
Chapter 
Regulatory, Sunken Vessel Removal and 
National Emergency Preparedness ......................... 50-1 
Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response and 
Recovery Activities ............ ....................... .. 51-1 
Appendices 
Flood Control Reservoirs Operable ................. ........... A-i 
Flood Control Reservoirs Constructed or Contributed to by Corps 
of Engineers but Operated by Others ........................... A-1-A 
Flood Control Projects Under Construction .................. .... B-1 
Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction ............... B-1-A 
Navigation Locks and Dams Operable .................. ......... C-1 
Navigation Projects Under Construction .......................... D-1 
Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable ............... . E-1 
Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction ........ F-1 
Flood Damages Suffered and Prevented ................. ....... G-1 
In d ex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ... I-1 
1iii

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION *
The New England Division, an operating division with 
both district and division functions, comprises all of New 
England except western Vermont and small portions of 
Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western 
boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern 
New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tributary 
to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the 
New York-Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers 
Island, NY. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Page 
Navigation 
1. Andrews River, MA ....................................... 1-3 
2. Aquatic Plant Control ................................ 1-3 
3. Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA................1-3 
4. Boston Harbor, MA ....................................... 1-3 
5. Bullocks Point Cove, RI ............................. 1-4 
6. Cape Cod Canal, MA..................................... 1-4 
7. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA ...................... 1-5 
8. Connecticut River below Hartford, CT ........ 1-5 
9. Criehaven Harbor, ME .............................. 1-6 
10. Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA ................................ 1-6 
11. Duxbury Harbor, MA ................................. 1-6 
12. Green Harbor, MA......................................... 1-7 
13. Guilford Harbor, CT ...................................... 1-7 
14. Hampton Harbor, NH ................................ 1-7 
15. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI .............. 1-7 
16. Josias River, ME ..................................... 1-8 
17. Little Harbor, NH ..................................... 1-8 
18. New Haven Harbor, CT ................................ 1-8 
19. Plymouth Harbor, MA ............................... 1-9 
20. Point Judith Pond and 
Harbor of Refuge, RI ..................................... 1-9 
21. Provincetown Harbor, MA ....................... 1-10 
22. Royal River, ME ..................................... 1-10 
23. Saco River, ME ..................................... 1-11 
24. Sakonnet Harbor, RI ................................... 1-11 
25. Scarboro River, ME ..................................... 1-11 
26. Scituate Harbor, MA ................................... 1-11 
27. Seekonk River, Providence, RI ................... 1-12 
28. Sesuit Harbor, MA ...................................... 1-12 
29. Stony Creek, Branford, CT ...................... 1-12 
30. Wellfleet Harbor, MA.................................. 1-13 
31. Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at 
Biddeford, ME ............................................ 1-13 
32. York Harbor, ME ..................................... 1-13 
33. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .... 1-14 
34. Other Authorized Navigation Projects....... 1-14 
35. Navigation Activities Pursuant to 
Section 107, Public Law 86-645 
(Preauthorization) .................................... 1-14 
Alterations of Bridges 
36. Authorized Bridge Alteration ..................... 1-14 
Beach Erosion Control 
37. Cliff Walk, Newport, RI .............................. 1-14 
38. Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT ............ 1-14 
39. Sandy Point Outfall, West Haven, CT ....... 1-14 
40. Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT.............. 1-15 
41. Southeast Lighthouse, Block 
Island, RI ..................................... 1-15 
42. Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT ................... 1-15 
43. Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion 
Control Projects ..................................... 1-16 
44. Other Authorized Beach Erosion 
Control Projects ..................................... 1-16 
45. Beach Erosion Control Activities 
Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 
87-874 (Preauthorization) ........................... 1-16 
46. Mitigation of Shore Damages Pursuant 
to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 
(Preauthorization) .................................... 1-16 
Flood Control 
47. Allendale Dam, North Providence, RI........ 1-16 
48. Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI .......... 1-16 
48A. West Hill Dam, MA.................................. 1-16 
49. Bluffs Community Center, Swansea, MA.. 1-16 
50. Charles River (Natural Valley 
Storage Areas), MA ..................................... 1-16 
51. Connecticut River Basin, VT, 
NH, MA and CT.................................. 1-17 
5A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT ............................. 1-18 
51B. Barre Falls Dam, MA ............................... 1-18 
51C. Birch Hill Dam, MA .................................... 1-18 
51D. Colebrook River Lake, CT ....................... 1-18 
51E. Conant Brook Dam, MA .............................. 1-19 
51F. Connecticut River, Middletown, CT...........1-19 
5.1G. Farmington River, Simsbury, CT ............ 1-19 
51H. Knightville Dam, MA ............................... 1-19 
51I. Lancaster, Israel River, NH ....................... -19 
1-1 
Page

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
Flood Control (Continued) 
51J. Littleville Lake, MA ................................. 1-20 
51K. North Hartland Lake, VT ........................ 1-20 
51L. North Springfield Lake, VT ..................... 1-20 
51M. Otter Brook Lake, NH ............................. 1-20 
51N. Riverdale, West Springfield, MA........... 1-20 
510. Surry Mountain Lake, NH....................... 1-21 
51P. Townshend Lake, VT .................................. 1-21 
51Q. Tully Lake, MA... ......................... 1-21 
51R. Union Village Dam, VT ............................ 1-22 
52. Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA ......... 1-22 
52A. Black Rock Lake, CT .................................. 1-22 
52B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT ......................... 1-22 
52C. Hop Brook Lake, CT................................. 1-23 
52D. Mad River, Waterbury 
(Woodtick Area), CT ................................. 1-23 
52E. Northfield Brook Lake, CT ..................... 1-23 
52F. Thomaston Dam, CT ................................... 1-23 
53. Machias River, Machiasport, ME ............ 1-24 
54. Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA ........ 1-24 
54A. Blackwater Dam, NH ............................... 1-24 
54B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH .................. 1-24 
54C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH ............................. 1-25 
54D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH ............... 1-25 
54E. North Nashua River, Leominster, MA....... 1-25 
54F. North Nashua River, Leominster 
(Sewer Line), M A..................... .............. 1-25 
55. Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME ......... 1-24 
56. New Bedford, Fairhaven, 
and Acushnet, MA.......................................1-26 
57. Point Shirley, Winthrop, MA................... 1-26 
58. Quonset Point, Davisville, RI ..................... 1-26 
59. Roughans Point, Revere, MA......................1-26 
60. Saint John River Basin, ME .......................- 27 
61. Saugus River & Tributaries, MA ......... 1-27 
62. Stamford, CT ..................................... 1-27 
63. Thames River Basin, CT, RI, and MA ....... 1-27 
63A. Buffumville Lake, MA................................. 1-28 
63B. East Brimfield Lake, MA ............................ 1-28 
63C. Hodges Village Dam, MA......................... 1-28 
63D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT ..................... 1-28 
63E. West Thompson Lake, CT........................ 1-28 
63F. Westville Lake, MA ..................................... 1-29 
64. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA ... 1-29 
65. West River, New Haven, CT...................... 1-29 
66. Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects ......................................... 1-29 
67. Flood Control Reservoir Operations .......... 1-30 
68. Hurricane Barrier Operations ................... 1-30 
69. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 1-30 
70. Flood Control Work Under 
Special Authorization ............................... 1-30 
Deauthorized Projects 
71. Deauthorized Projects .............................. 1-31 
General Investigations 
72. Surveys ........................................ 1-31 
73. Collection and Study of Basic Data............1-31 
74. Planning, Engineering and Design ............ 1-31 
75. Preconstruction Engineering and 
Design ..................................... 1-31 
Tables 
Table 1-A Cost & Financial Statement ............- 32 
Table 1-B Authorizing Legislation ................ 1-44 
Table 1-C Other Authorized 
Navigation Projects ................... 1-53 
Table 1-D Other Authorized Beach 
Erosion Control Projects ................ 1-57 
Table 1-E Other Authorized 
Flood Control Projects ................. 1-58 
Table 1-F Other Authorized Multiple- 
Purpose Projects including Power ... 1-60 
Table 1-G Deauthorized Projects .................... 1-61 
Table 1-H Navigation Activities 
Pursuant to Sec. 107 ..................... 1-64 
Table 1-I Beach Erosion Activities 
Pursuant to Sec. 103 ..................... 1-64 
Table 1-J Mitigation of Shore Damages 
Pursuant to Sec. 111...................... 1-64 
Table 1-K Flood Control Activities 
Pursuant to Sec. 205 .................... 1-65 
Table 1-L Project Modifications for the 
Improvement of the Environment 
Pursuant to Sec. 1135.................... 1-65 
Table 1-M Blackstone River Basin ................... 1-65 
Table 1-N Connecticut River Basin .................. 1-66 
Table 1-0 Housatonic River Basin .............. 1-68 
Table 1-P Merrimack River Basin .................... 1-69 
Table 1-Q Thames River Basin ..................... 1-70 
Table 1-R Reconnaissance and 
Condition Surveys ............................ 1-71 
1-2 
Page- Page

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
Navigation 
1. ANDREWS RIVER, MA 
Location. On Nantucket Sound within town of 
Harwich, MA, about 84 miles southeast of Boston, MA. 
(See National Ocean Survey Chart 13229.) 
Existing project. Channel six feet deep, 75 feet wide, 
extending about 2,900 feet from deep water in Nantucket 
Sound to a public marina, two jetties on east and west 
sides of harbor entrance, and three-acre maneuvering 
and anchorage basin. Eastjetty completed in June 1967. 
Dredging was completed in April 1968. Construction of 
west jetty was completed in May 1973. (See Table 1-B at 
end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. None. 
Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance. Maintenance 
dredging of the entrance channel by the Government-
owned dredge CURRITUCK was performed from 
June 21 to June 24, 1995 at a rental cost of $22,000. A 
total of 2,600 cubic yards of sand were removed and 
placed in a nearshore disposal site southeast of entrance 
channel in Nantucket Sound. Hired labor costs of $21,300 
were incurred for performing and plotting pre- and afterdredge 
surveys and progress surveys, and $8,950 for 
project condition surveys. 
2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL 
Location. The program is conducted in all navigable 
waters, tributary streams, connecting channels and 
associated waters under the New England Division jurisdiction. 
Existing project. The purpose of the program is to 
provide technical assistance in the eradication or control 
of aquatic plants that are causing or have the potential 
to cause major economic problems in the above waterways. 
The plant control is done in the interest of 
navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and 
wildlife conservation, public health and research. The 
program is administered by the Chief of Engineers, 
under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, and in 
cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. (See 
Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing 
project.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 
at least 50 percent of the cost of planning beyond the 
reconnaissance stage and at least 50 percent of the cost 
of controlling the aquatic plants, and in addition must 
hold the United States free from damages that may occur 
from control operations. 
Operations during fiscal year. On request, technical 
information was provided to local interests on 
specific aquatic weed problems. These problems included 
nuisance growth of aquatic vegetation in the Charles 
River and several lakes. 
3. AUNT LYDIA'S COVE, CHATHAM, MA 
Location. Aunt Lydia's Cove is located in Chatham 
Harbor, Chatham, Massachusetts. The cove is approximately 
90 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts on 
the "elbow" of Cape Cod. 
Existing project. Provides for the dredging of an 
entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a 
length of 900 feet, and dredging of a 9.5 acre anchorage 
also to a depth of 8 feet. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter 
for Act authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement 
(PCA) was signed on 24 August 1994 between the 
Corps and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The 
project sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal 
areas and perform all relocations determined by the 
Government to be necessary for project construction; 
provide during the period of construction a cash contribution 
equal to ten percent of total project costs; repay 
with interest, over a period not to exceed 30 years 
following completion of construction, an additional 10 
percent of total project costs partially offset by a credit 
allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
relocations and dredged material disposal areas; and 
provide and maintain all berthing areas and local access 
channels commensurate with project features. 
Terminal facilities. The Chatham Municipal Fish 
Pier is the only terminal facility in Aunt Lydia's Cove. 
Initially constructed in 1945, the pier is used to off-load 
catch, access boats, load supplies and perform some 
repairs. Two independent fish companies lease space at 
the pier's main packing facility where fish are offloaded, 
packed in ice and shipped to various distributors. The 
pier provides diesel fuel, gasoline, parking and restroom 
facilities. Transient and recreational boaters use the 
pier for loading, offloading, and refueling. This facility is 
adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A 
contract for improvement dredging was awarded 17 
November 1994. Work began in December 1994 and was 
completed in June 1995. To date, the contractor has 
received $495,685 with final payment pending at fiscal 
year end. 
4. BOSTON HARBOR, MA 
Location. Harbor includes all expanse of tidewater 
lying within a line from Point Allerton to Point Shirley 
and extending from that line westward to mainland. 
This comprises an area of about 47 square miles, exclusive 
of the islands. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 
13270 and 13272.) 
Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 
1915, 1917, 1938. 
Existing project. Completed work at Boston Harbor, 
adopted in 1825 and supplemented by enactments 
through 1958, provides for the improvement of the harbor 
proper and its approaches - Fort Point Channel, 
Reserved Channel, Chelsea River and Weir River. For a 
1-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
more detailed description see page 3 of Annual Reportfor 
1974. These improvements were completed in May 1966 
with the construction of the Chelsea River 35-foot channel 
and maneuvering basin. New work involves deepening 
the Mystic River and Reserved Channels from 35 to 
40 feet and the Chelsea River Channel from 35 to 38 feet; 
widening and deepening to 40 feet the Inner Confluence 
Area which provides access to the Mystic and Chelsea 
River Channels; and widening at the entrance to the 
Reserved Channel. The proposed project would increase 
the navigational efficiency and safety of harbor operations 
and reduce tidal delays for larger vessels. (See 
Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing 
projects.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. Formal assurances for new work have not 
been requested yet. Consistent with the cost sharing and 
financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must 
pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation 
during construction, currently estimated at 
$6,800,000; reimburse an additional ten percent of the 
costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 
30 years following completion of construction (partially 
offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material 
disposal areas), currently estimated at $1,720,000; relocate 
utilities necessary for construction of the project, 
currently estimated at $1,000,000; and deepen berthing 
areas at the terminals of project beneficiaries, currently 
estimated at $2,300,000. 
Terminal facilities. There are 156 wharves and 
piers in harbor, not including Mystic, Weymouth-Fore, 
and Town Rivers, which are reported elsewhere. Of the 
terminals, 28 are publicly owned, 13 are open to public 
use, 73 have mechanical-handling facilities, and 70 have 
railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate 
for existing commerce. For a full description of channel 
facilities in Chelsea River, refer to House Document 350, 
87th Congress, 2nd session. (See Port Series No. 3, Part 
2, Port of Boston, MA dated 1967.) 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued 
preconstruction engineering and design activities 
including preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement, 
which was filed with the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency on 30 June 1995. Maintenance: Hired 
labor costs of $125,200 were incurred for continued work 
on an Enviornmental Impact Statement for improvement 
and maintenance dredging and $1,200 for contract 
processing. Additional costs for meetings, reproduction, 
and mailings associated with the Environmental Impact 
Statement were $29,000. Earnings this year for a contract 
awarded last fiscal year for environmental studies 
for the Boston Harbor Navigation Improvement, Maintenance, 
and Berth Dredging Environmental Impact Report/
Statement were $17,700. An additional $47,515.48 
was obligated for benthic sampling under the above 
contract with earnings this year of $40,020. The cost of 
having the East Coast Dredge Estimating Team review 
cost estimates for the various disposal alternatives was 
$7,627. 
5. BULLOCKS POINT COVE, RI 
Location. Bullocks Point Cove is on the east shore of 
Providence River about three-quarters of a mile above 
the head of Narragansett Bay and 4.5 miles south of 
Providence Harbor. The lower one-half mile of the cove, 
covering approximately 100 acres, is separated from 
Providence River by a small peninsula extending southerly 
from the mainland to Bullock Point. (See U.S. Coast 
and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 278.) 
Existing project. For description of existing project 
see Annual Report for 1974. Construction was completed 
in May 1959. The dike and jetty construction was 
initiated in June 1958 and completed in September 1958. 
Improved dredging of the 8-foot channel, 6-foot anchorage, 
and turning basin was initiated in January 1959 and 
completed in May 1959. (See Table 1-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Three boatyards and one marina 
offer supply, repair, and service facilities to the 
general public. These private interests offer cove moorings, 
berthing areas, and spaces for land storage during 
winter months. Additional moorings are available for 
the general public in the anchorage areas controlled and 
supervised by the harbormaster. Pursuant to a condition 
of local cooperation in conjunction with project authorization, 
a public landing ramp has been constructed in the 
Cove for use by the general public. 
Operations during fiscalyear. Maintenance: Maintenance 
dredging of the entrance channel by the Government-
owned dredge CURRITUCK was performed from 
June 29 to July 6, 1995 at a rental cost of $52,000. A total 
of 5,250 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed 
of at a nearshore site on the west side of the Providence 
River Channel and north ofConimicut Point. Hired labor 
costs of $24,900 were incurred for performing pre-and 
after-dredge surveys and progress surveys. 
6. CAPE COD CANAL, MA 
Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending 
from the head of Buzzards Bay, MA, easterly to a 
point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of 
Plymouth Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Survey 
Chart 13246.) 
Existing project. For description of existing project 
see Annual Report for 1975. (See Table 1-B at end of 
chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Navigational 
improvements were completed in April 1963, with 
completion of East Boat Basin extension. Initial recreational 
development consists of public use facilities at 
various locations, which were completed in February 
1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East 
Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of 
public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed 
in May 1976. Canal is crossed by two high-level 
highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Ini- 
1-4

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
tial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway Bridge was 
completed in December 1965. More recent major rehabilitation 
of the two highway bridges crossing the canal 
is completed. Rehabilitation of the Bourne Highway 
Bridge was completed in 1981. The Sagamore Highway 
Bridge was completed in 1982. Minor rehabilitation of 
stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests 
must also bear 50 percent of future recreational 
development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water 
Project Recreation Act. 
Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on 
the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are 
used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for 
receipt and storage of oil. The seventh terminal is the 
State pier, which is owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 
and is located on the north bank of the canal at 
Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for 
which they are used. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The 
cost of operation and maintenance work at the Cape Cod 
Canal totalled $6,540,254 for fiscal year 1995. A contract 
to paint the Bourne highway bridge was awarded in 
September 1992. Work began in October 1992 and was 
completed in December 1993. A payment of $22,142 was 
processed during the fiscal year bringing contractor 
earnings to $2,239,470 with final payment still pending. 
A contract to repave canal service roads was awarded 26 
September 1994. Work began the following month and 
was completed December 1994. Final contract amount 
was $409,138. A contract to replace the roof of the traffic 
control building was awarded 12 September 1994. Work 
began the following month and was substantially complete 
in June 1995. Contractor earnings totalled $20,000 
with final contract payment and possible contract modification 
pending at fiscal year end. A contract to replace 
the road expansion joint on the Sagamore Bridge was 
awarded 17 March 1995. Work began in September 1995 
and was about 75 percent complete atfiscal year end with 
contractor earnings of $155,245. A contract for an 
experimental paint coating system for the Railroad Bridge 
was awarded 13 September 1994. Work began the 
following month and was completed in November 1994. 
Final contract amount was $23,874. Work accomplished 
by a combination of hired labor and contract included 
$1,626,808 for vessel traffic control activities; $694,158 
for maintenance of buildings, grounds and utilities; 
$500,967 for operation and management of recreational 
facilities; $538,327 for administrationfacilities; $183,417 
for utilities; $133,836 for maintenance of roads and 
bridges; $47,999 for periodic inspections; $333,093 for 
A/E services and engineering and design; $74,993 for 
contract supervision and administration; $19,625 for 
general real estate activities; $23,454 for boundary 
monumentation; $21,814 for audit of Bay Colony Railroad; 
$90,682 for hydropower demonstration project; 
$157,289 for master plan and archeological study and 
$7,719 for Environmental Review Guide for Operation 
(ERGO) inspection and corrective actions. Other operation 
and maintenance work accomplished by contract 
included miscellaneous repairs to the Sagamore Bridge 
$106,831; upgrades to the Herring Run Recreation Area 
$13,459; CCTV radar replacements $199,866; upgrades 
and attendants at the Midway Recreation Area $46,703; 
upgrades to the marine traffic control system $105,000; 
geographic information system andfsupporting computer 
equipment $233,764; vehicle replacement $50,470; 
oil contingency plan $98,305; heavy equipment replacement 
$181,261; halon system replacement $23,838; upgrades 
to the warehouse, Sandwich and Wings Neck 
radar sites, and Sandwich Boat House $68,841; and 
operation and maintenance of the Buzzards Bay Railroad 
Bridge $327,336. 
7. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA 
Location. At northeastern corner of Nantucket Sound 
about 16 miles east of Hyannis Harbor, MA, and 66 miles 
south of Providence Harbor, RI, at southeastern extremity 
of Cape Cod. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 
13237.) 
Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 
1942. 
Existing project. An entrance channel ten feet deep 
and 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper 
harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing 
existing project.) Construction of existing project 
was initiated in September and completed in October 
1957. By 1961, a break in barrier beach connecting 
Morris and Monomoy Islands caused Federal Channel to 
fill in completely. Local interests dredged an emergency 
channel to obtain eight-foot depth in June 1962 and 
performed additional dredging in 1963. Minimal maintenance 
dredging by the Federal Government in April and 
May 1964 provided access to inner harbor for 1964 
boating season. Anew ten-foot channel through Harding 
Beach to Morris Island was completed in July 1965. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. The town operates a wharf on 
the north side of the inner harbor which is leased out to 
commercial users. Facilities are adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance 
dredging in the entrance channel by the Government-
owned dredge CURRITUCK was performed from 
June 1, to June 20, 1995 at a rental cost of $124,000. A 
total of 50,000 cubic yards of sand were removed and 
disposed of at a nearshore site off of Harding Beach. 
Hired labor costs of $36,400 were incurred for performing 
and plotting pre-and after-dredge surveys and 
progress surveys, and $21,800 for conducting project 
condition surveys. 
8. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW 
HARTFORD, CT 
Location. Has its source in Connecticut Lake in 
northern New Hampshire, flows southerly 380 miles and 
empties into Long Island Sound at Saybrook, CT, 14 
miles west of New London. Hartford, now head of 
1-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
commercial navigation, is 52 statute miles, by channel, 
from mouth. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12373 
and 12377.) 
Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 
1915 and 1938. 
Eightmile River, CT, elimination as separate project: 
Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 75 feet wide from 
deep water in Connecticut River to Hamburg and for 
turning basin of same depth, 150. feet wide, approximately 
300 feet long at Hamburg. Project was adopted by 
River and Harbor Act of 1910. Costs and expenditures 
were $9,000 all for new work. In accordance with River 
and Harbor Act of 1950, project for Connecticut River 
below Hartford was modified to include project for 
Eightmile River. Aforementioned Act also provided for 
an anchorage basin 6 feet deep and about 6.5 acres in 
area in upper cove in Hamburg; a channel 15 feet deep 
and 150 feet wide for a distance of 52 miles upstream to 
Hartford; two riprap jetties at the mouth of the river; and 
dikes, training walls, revetments and other regulatory 
works along the riverbetween Hartford and Gildersleeve 
Island. The project provides for small-boat improvements 
at Wethersfield Cove; Eightmile River; Essex; and 
North Cove, Old Saybrook. For a more detailed description 
of project see page 7 of Annual Report for 1974. (See 
Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing 
project.) Existing project was completed in September 
1965 with the construction of channel and anchorage in 
North Cove, Old Saybrook, CT. For further details, see 
Annual Report for 1974. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Along both Connecticut and 
Eightmile Rivers there are two or three wharves at each 
river town, one or more in each town being open to public 
use. At Hartford and Middletown there is about one-half 
of wharf frontage along west bank of river. Facilities are 
adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations duringfiscalyear. Maintenance: Hired 
labor costs incurred in association with maintenance 
dredging performed last fiscal year were $2,300 for 
plotting an after-dredge survey, contract closeout costs of 
$4,800 for supervision and inspection, and $200 for 
contract processing. A contract adjustment for maintenance 
dredgingwas made decreasingthe contract amount 
by $878, bringing the final contract cost to $353,386. An 
adjustment was made to a contract for inspection services 
to supervise disposal of dredged material decreasing 
that contract amount by $1,147, for a final cost of 
$4,994. Other work included $129,770 for project condition 
surveys. 
9. CRIEHAVEN HARBOR, ME 
Location. This harbor is on the northwesterly side of 
Ragged Island, one of the largest of a group lying about 
12 miles off the mouth of Penobscot Bay, Maine. (See 
U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 225 and 
1203.) 
Existing project. Provides for a rubblestone breakwater 
extending about 300 feet in a northerly direction 
from Sunset Point. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for 
Act authorizing existing project.) The project was completed 
in 1935 and repairs were made to the breakwater 
in May 1938. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are several wharves 
within the harbor sufficient for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
continuing contract for breakwater repair was awarded 
in May 1995. The work started in July and continued 
through the end of the fiscal year. The contractor placed 
1,465 tons of cover stone and 1,105 tons of core stone. 
Contractor earings were $387,860 through the end of the 
fiscal year. Hired labor costs included $16,300 for the 
preparation of plans and specification, $14,000 for supervision 
and inspection, and $2,500 for contract processing. 
10. CUTTYHUNK HARBOR, MA 
Location. At eastern end of Cuttyhunk Island, at 
western entrance to Buzzards Bay, about 14 miles south 
of New Bedford Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean 
Survey Chart 13229.) 
Existing project. A channel generally 75 feet wide 
and 10 feet deep from outer harbor to westerly terminal 
in Cuttyhunk Pond, about 3,500 feet long; an anchorage 
in inner harbor 10 feet deep, 900 feet long, and 800 feet 
wide; and maintenance of existing jetties and stone 
dikes. Existing project was completed in 1939. (See 
Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing 
project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Disposal 
areas for maintenance will be furnished when required. 
Terminal facilities. Two town wharves of timber 
and pile construction, having total berthing space of 400 
feet, are open to public use. Limited mechanical-handling 
facilities are available. Facilities are adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
final adjustment of $-12,381 was made, reducing expenditures 
reported last fiscal year for channel dredging by 
the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCKto $102,619. 
Hired labor costs of $1,062 were incurred for plotting an 
after-dredge survey. 
11. DUXBURY HARBOR, MA 
Location. On west side of Duxbury Bay, about 48 
miles by water south of Boston and 18 miles northwest of 
easterly entrance to Cape Cod Canal. (See Coast and 
Geodetic Survey Chart Nos. 245 and 1208.) 
Previous project. For detail see Annual Report for 
1908. 
Existing project. Channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet 
wide along alignment of existing channel to Town Wharf 
1-6

"VVo;p' r)" r yy r. a r<{s,.; 4! $ q(f' i pr<r. '-.- r y rr f{j 
from Easterly Channel, and anchorage basin 8 feet deep 
of about 21 acres. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for 
Acts authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Five wharfs on waterfront, one 
is open to public without charge, two boatyards and one 
yacht club. Facilities are very limited, but considered 
adequate for present activities of harbor. 
Operations during fiscalyear. Maintenance: Hired 
labor costs in the amount of $2,962 were incurred for 
preparation of plans and specifications for proposed 
maintenance dredging, and $37,500 was expended for 
project condition surveys. 
12. GREEN HARBOR, MA 
Location. On west side of Massachusetts Bay within 
the town of Marshfield, MA, about 30 miles southeast of 
Boston, MA, and nine miles north of Plymouth Harbor, 
MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13253.) 
Existing project. Provides for channel six feet deep 
(eight feet at entrance), 100 feet wide extending about 
4,000 feet from deep water to head of navigation with 
small turning basin at upstream limit; five-acre anchorage 
near Town Pier, six feet deep; sealing, rebuilding in 
part, and a 200-foot extension of existing west jetty at 
elevation +12, with dike to beach berm at elevation +14 
feet, and raising east jetty to elevation +14. (See Table 1- 
B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) 
Construction was completed in October 1969. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town 
Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, 
earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet 
wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is 
south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft 
has been developed on south side of harbor near head of 
navigation. 
Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance 
dredging of the entrance channel by the Government-
owned dredge CURRITUCK was performed from 
May 10, to May 31, 1995 at a rental cost of $160,000. A 
total of 21,060 cubic yards of sand were removed and 
disposed of at a nearshore site off of Green Harbor Beach. 
Hired labor costs of $69,700 were incurred for performing 
and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys and 
progress surveys. A final adjustment of $35,461 was 
made to rental costs forfiscal year 1994 bringing the total 
cost of that work to $170,539. 
13. GUILFORD HARBOR, CT 
Location. On north side of Long Island Sound about 
13 miles east of New Haven Harbor, CT. (See National 
Ocean Survey Chart 12354.) 
Existing project. An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 
100 feet wide through the harbor from Long Island 
Sound to an anchorage basin in East River, length 0.8 
mile; a channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide up Sluice Creek 
880 feet to Whitfield Street; an anchorage basin 6 feet 
deep, 200 feet wide in East River, length 1,500 feet. 
Mean and spring tidal ranges are 5.4 and 6.4 feet, 
respectively. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act 
authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 
April 1957. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. State wharf about 370 feet long 
provides adequate facilities for existing commerce. Town 
wharf on north bank of East River at foot of Whitfield 
Street is no longer usable. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Final 
payment and contract closeout for maintenance dredging 
completed last fiscal year are pending resolution of 
contract claims. The contract was awarded in September 
1992. Payment of $5,000 was made this fiscal year. 
Liquidated damages in the amount of $126,392 were 
deducted from the amount due the contractor, bringing 
the total amount paid thus far to $332,229. Hired labor 
costs of $2,600 were incurred for supervision and inspection 
and travel costs, and $6,050 was spent for project 
condition surveys. 
14. HAMPTON HARBOR, NH 
Location. On New Hampshire seacoast 13 miles 
south of POrtsmouth Harbor, 5 miles north of mouth of 
Merrimack River at Newburyport, MA. (See National 
Ocean Survey Chart 13278.) 
Existing project. Extending north jetty 1,000 feet, 
raising outer 300 feet of south jetty and constructing a 
180-foot spur to high ground, and dredging to provide a 
channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across entrance 
bar. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authoring 
existing project.) Project was completed in November 
1965. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are seven piers in Hampton 
Harbor. State of New Hampshire maintains three 
pile and timber piers, two in Hampton about 1,500 feet 
north of entrance and one in Seabrook, one-half mile 
south of entrance. Hampton pier has a 6-foot walkway to 
a float that has depths of 4 to 6 feet. Seabrook pier has 
a float and a water depth of about 3 feet at outer end. One 
landing is open to the public. Facilities are adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations duringfiscalyear. Maintenance: Hired 
labor costs of $1,951 were incurred for the preparation of 
plans and specifications for repair of the handrail on the 
north jetty. A contract for handrail repairs in the amount 
of$2,190 was awarded in September 1995. Work had not 
begun by fiscal year end. Other work included $13,000 
for project condition surveys. 
15. HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK 
ISLAND, RI 
Location. On east side of Block Island, near south 
1-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OR'iT AMY 01CW1 WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
end of inner curve of shoreline 13 miles south-southwest 
from Point Judith Harbor, RI, and about 25 miles southeasterly 
from Stonington Harbor, CT. (See National 
Ocean Survey Chart 13217.) 
Existing project. For description of existing project, 
see Annual Report for 1976. (See Table 1-B at end of 
chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Completed 
in 1916 except for inactive portion. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Two wharves in harbor, both 
steel sheet pile bulkhead which comprises southern and 
eastern limits of basin. Total docking space amounts to 
500 feet. No mechanical-handling facilities are available. 
One wharf owned by town and open to public, is 
considered inadequate for present general needs of boating 
in harbor. There is limited room for expansion of 
terminal facilities. 
Operations duringfiscalyear. Maintenance: Work 
under a continuing contract awarded last fiscal year for 
rehabilitation of the east breakwater was completed in 
November 1994. Contractor earnings this fiscal year 
were $367,892, bringing the total contract cost to 
$417,892. The United States Coast Guard provided 
$10,000 of the contract amount for replacement of a 
navigation aid. Hired labor costs included $27,300 for 
supervision and inspection, and $2,400 for contract processing. 
Maintenance dredging of the 15-foot federal 
channel under a contract awarded this fiscal year was 
accomplished between February 20-28, 1995 at a contract 
cost of $267,615. A total of 27,363 cubic yards of 
sand were removed by hopper dredge and disposed ofjust 
offshore of the beach north of the harbor entrance. Hired 
labor costs for the dredging included $3,100 for preparation 
of plans and specifications, $11,200 for supervision 
and inspection, $29,600 for performing and plotting preand 
after-dredge surveys, and $400 for contract processing. 
16. JOSIAS RIVER, ME 
Location. A small river running through Flat Pond 
to Perkins Cove, which is the harbor for Ogunquit, a 
village on coast of Maine 30 miles southwest of Portland. 
(See National Ocean Survey Chart 13286.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep 
and 40 feet wide in Josias River from that depth in 
Perkins Cove to and including anchorage basins of same 
depth and about 4.2 acres in area in Flat Pond. Project 
was completed in March 1960. New work involves 
deepening the existing 900-foot Federal channel and 2.1 
acres of the anchorage area to 7 feet. This work was 
completed in January 1994. (See Table 1-B at end of 
chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. 
Terminal facilities. There are four wharves in the 
harbor, all owned by the Ogunquit Village Corporation 
and open to the public free of charge. Three of these 
wharves are in Flat Pond and Perkins Cove. The village 
corporation also erected a pile-and-timber bulkhead 
backed with earthfill, on the northerly shore of the river. 
The easterly end of this bulkhead is about 300 feet below 
the footbridge from which point it extends 490 feet along 
the northerly bank of the river into Flat Pond. A marine 
railway capable of handling boats up to 50 feet long is 
immediately east of the bulkhead. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A 
contract for improvement dredging along the Josias 
River was awarded February 10, 1993. Work began in 
November 1993 and was completed in January 1994. 
Final contract amount was $401,756, of which $194,258 
was for new work. Maintenance: Additional payment of 
$78,770 was made under a contract for maintenance 
dreding performed last fiscal year in conjunction with 
the improvement dredging. This reflected an adjustment 
based on final determination of quantities removed. 
Hired labor costs associated with maintenance 
dredging included $2,300 for supervision and inspection 
associated with contract closeout, and $300 for contract 
processing. 
17. LITTLE HARBOR, NH 
Location. Little Harbor is located on the west side of 
Portsmouth Harbor between New Castle Island and the 
New Hampshire mainland. 
Existing project. For description of existing project 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1976. 
(See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing 
existing project.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. One dock owned by Wentworth 
Hotel, but not available to public. Tentative State plans 
include a small boat landing and shore facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
final adjustment of$-2,961 was made, reducing expenditures 
reported last fiscal year for channel dredgingby the 
Government-owned dredge CURRITUCK to $58,039. 
18. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT 
Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, 
about 75 miles east of New York City. (See National 
Ocean Survey Chart 12371.) 
Previous project. For details, see Annual Reports for 
1915 and 1938. 
Existing project. A main channel 35 feet deep, 400 to 
800 feet wide, from Long Island Sound to Tomlinson 
Bridge; two anchorage basins below Tomlinson Bridge of 
16 and 15-foot depths; a pile-and-riprap dike about 4,200 
feet long, to contract tidal flow at Fort Hale Bar; a 
channel 12 feet deep and 100 to 150 feet wide, from 
southwest corner of 16-foot anchorage basin via City 
Point and West Haven Wharf front to Kimberly Avenue 
Bridge; thence 12 feet deep and prevailing width of 75 
feet up West River to about 600 feet upstream of Kimberly 
Avenue Bridge, and an anchorage basin six feet 
deep in West River oppositeMars Wharf; a channel 100 
1-8

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
feet wide and 12 feet deep from 15-foot anchorage basin 
toward Brewery Street, about 300 feet; a channel in 
Quinnipiac River 22 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide to 
a point about 1,000 feet above Ferry Street, thence 16 
feet deep and 200 feet wide to Grand Avenue, with 
turning basin 22 feet deep, 200 to 800 feet wide, and 700 
feet long at mouth of Mill River; a channel up Mill River 
12 feet deep, 200 feet wide to junction of two branches 
above Chapel Street, thence to Grand Avenue, 100 feet 
wide in East Branch and generally 125 feet wide in West 
Branch; and removal of certain obstructive rocks in 
Morris Cove. Existing project was completed in 1961. 
The 22-foot channel and turning basin is to be restudied. 
Estimated cost (1960) of this portion is $980,000. (See 
Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing 
project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. 
Terminal facilities. Port of New Haven is served by 
24 waterfront facilities; most are within city limits of 
New Haven. Improved waterways within port area 
along which facilities are located include West River, 
Main Harbor, West and East Branches of Mill River, and 
Quinnipiac River channels. Facilities are all privately 
owned and operated with exception of City Wharf and 
U.S. Coast Guard Wharf. Depths alongside piers and 
wharves range from 35 to zero feet at mean low water. 
Some of the facilities have rail connections and all are 
accessible by paved streets. Facilities are adequate for 
existing commerce. (For further details see Ports of 
Southern New England No. 4, revised 1983.) 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
final adjustment of $-28,320 for liquidated damages was 
made, reducing expenditures reported last fiscal year for 
maintenance dredging of the 35-foot main ship channel 
under a contract awarded in September 1993 and completed 
in January 1994. Of this amount $6,720 was in 
excess of actual expenses and sent to the U.S. Treasury. 
Total contractor earnings after adjustments are 
$2,022,568. Hired labor costs in the amount of $200 were 
incurred for supervision and inspection in finalizing the 
contract and $4,800 for project condition surveys. 
19. PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA 
Location. Harbor is 45 miles by water south of 
Boston, MA. Its outer anchorage, the "Cow Yard," is 
common to Plymouth, Duxbury, and Kingston, MA. (See 
National Ocean Survey Chart 13253.) 
Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports 
for 1815 and 1938. 
Existing project. Provides for protecting by riprap 
sections of Long Beach damaged by storm of November 
1898, and restoring Eel River to its former course; dredging 
a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide, increased at 
entrance and on curves, from the bay to town wharves, 
formerly in areas south of State Pier, a distance of about 
2.5 miles, with a suitable turning basin at inner end; 
dredging a channel 150 feet wide, 15 feet deep, extending
1-9 
northwesterly about 0.3 miles from a point off site of 
northerly Craigs Wharf (now State Pier) with a turning 
basin 300 feet square, and of same depth, at its northwesterly 
end; maintenance of area dredged to 18 feet 
deep by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, connecting 
15-foot channel with 18-foot channel in vicinity of 
State Pier; a rubblestone breakwater extending 1,400 
feet easterly from a point north of Town Wharf, and 
thence southeasterly for 2,100 feet; an anchorage eight 
feet deep and 60 acres in area inside breakwater, and 
elimination of authorized 18-foot anchorage from existing 
project; recreational development, to provide for 
sport fishingfrom breakwater, consisting of stone causeway 
about 360 feet long from westerly end of breakwater 
to land, guardrail along top of breakwater and causeway 
footbridge spanning a navigation opening through breakwater, 
and public access, parking and sanitary facilities 
for sport fisherman use. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter 
for Acts authorizing existing project.) Project is complete. 
Construction of anchorage eight feet deep and 60 
acres in area inside breakwater was completed in 1967. 
Construction of the rubblestone breakwater was completed 
in 1971. Rehabilitation of Long Beach Dike was 
completed in 1971. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are three wharves of pile 
and timber construction; one is owned by the State, one 
by the town, and the third by Plymouth Yacht Club. 
State and town wharves are open to public use. In 
addition, there are two boatyards with marine railway 
facilities along waterfront, equipped for boat building 
and repairs. Local interests will maintain existing public 
landings open to all on equal terms, and provide all 
necessary mooring facilities in anchorage. 
Operations duringfiscalyear. Maintenance: Hired 
labor costs of $4,315 were incurred for the preparation of 
plans and specifications for repairs to the Plymouth Long 
Beach Dike, $5,000 for initial work on a Section 216 
Study relating to dike repairs and $26,400 for project 
condition surveys. 
20. POINT JUDITH POND AND 
HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI 
Location. Point Judith marks the southwestern entrance 
to Narragansett Bay. Harbor lies in shallow bight 
west of point, about 14 miles southwest of Newport 
Harbor, RI, and 33 miles east of New London Harbor, CT. 
Point Judith Pond is a shallow salt pond, lying inland of 
the beach, with a length north and south of about four 
miles. A small artificial opening through the beach and 
sand dunes connects this pond to the ocean. (See National 
Ocean Survey Charts 13218 and 13219.) 
Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 
1948. 
Existing project. For description of existing project 
see Annual Report for 1977. (See Table 1-B at end of 
chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) All work 
for project authorized prior to 1949 was completed in

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
1950. Breakwaters were completed in 1914 and dredging 
of shoals in project area was done in 1921. Main and 
east shore arm breakwater had deteriorated and required 
restoration to project design. In 1962 reconstruction 
of east arm breakwater and main breakwater dock 
facilities were completed. Rehabilitation required for 
remainder of breakwater restoration was completed in 
October 1963. The extension of the 15-foot channel was 
completed in April 1977. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Consist of one town wharf of 
steel sheet pile bulkhead construction which comprises 
southern and eastern limits ofbasin. Total docking space 
amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical handling facilities 
are available. Wharf is owned by the town and open to 
the public. State of Rhode Island maintains two State 
piers, one in Galilee and one in Jerusalem, each having 
about 500 feet of berthing space. A facility comprising a 
bulkhead with 15 finger piers provides berthing space of 
about 4,000 linear feet. This facility is used for receipt of 
fish and fish products. Mechanical handling facilities 
including fish pumps, are available for discharge of 
cargo. In addition, there are approximately ten small 
privately owned wharves used in the fishing business 
and passenger traffic. Facilities are adequate for exisiting 
commerce. 
Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Work 
under a continuing contract awarded in September 1994 
for rehabilitation of the east shore arm breakwater was 
performed from October 1994 to May 1995 at a cost of 
$1,620,540, of which $2,268 was provided by the U.S. 
Coast Guard to initiate repairs to the light structure. 
The amount of work necessary to accomplish the repairs 
was underestimated. Following negotiations with the 
contractor, work ceased on May 30, 1995. Through 
coordination with local and State officials, it was determined 
that the work completed on the breakwater is 
sufficient to satisfy the Congressionally authorized navigation 
purpose. Hired labor costs included $7,100 for the 
preparation of plans and specifications, $71,100 for supervision 
and inspection, and $1,300 for contract processing. 
Costs of $43,200 were incurred for project 
condition surveys. 
21. PROVINCETOWN HARBOR, MA 
Location. Provincetown Harbor is located in the bight 
at the northern extremity of Cape Cod, about 40 miles 
southeast of Gloucester, 24 miles northeast of the Cape 
Cod Canal and 40 miles southeast of the entrance to 
Boston Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 
13249 and 13246.) 
Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 
1915 and 1931. 
Existing project. Completed work at Provincetown 
Harbor was adopted in 1910, modified in 1948 and 
amended twice by the Chief of Engineers in 1967. This 
work provides for a rubblestone dike extending about 
6,150 feet from Stevens Point, at the west end of the 
harbor, southward across House Point Island Flats to 
Wood End, and an offshore stone breakwater about 2,500 
feet long, parallel to the shore and about 835 feet from the 
end of MacMillan Wharf. Construction ofthe rubblestone 
dike was completed in 1914 and the stone breakwater 
was completed in 1972. New work provides for a channel 
13 feet deep by 250 feet wide extending about 2,000 feet 
from deep water just outside the west end of the stone 
breakwater to MacMillan Wharf. Approximately 15,000 
cubic yards of sandy dredge material would be placed 
along 600 feet of beach located just west of the Old 
Reliable Fish House Pier. (See Table 1-B at end of 
chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. A Project Cooperation Agreement was 
signed on 29 September 1995 between the Corps and the 
Commonwealth of Massachusetts for new work. The 
project sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal 
areas and perform all relocations determined by the 
Government to be necessary for project construction; 
provide during the period of construction a cash contribution 
equal to 10 percent of total project costs; repay 
with interest, over a period not to exceed 30 years 
following completion of construction, an additional 10 
percent of total project costs partially offset by a credit 
allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
relocations and dredged material disposal areas; and 
provide and maintain all berthing areas and local access 
channels commensurate with project features. 
Terminal facilities. Waterfront development in 
Provincetown extends about 1.5 miles and is mostly 
privately owned. There are seven piers in this area 
which handle the entire commerce of the harbor. None 
of these piers have railroad connections. Facilities are 
adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A 
contract for improvement dredging was awarded 29 
September 1995. Work had not begun by fiscal year end. 
22. ROYAL RIVER, ME 
Location. Situated 11 miles north of Portland, Maine 
in Yarmouth Village. Royal is a small coastal stream 
which empties into Casco Bay. (See National Ocean 
Survey Chart 13290.) 
Existing project. Provides for enlargement of channel 
through bar at Gravel Point, 100 feet wide, 4.5 feet 
deep up to head of commercial navigation at Yarmouth, 
and removal of several ledges near village of Yarmouth; 
construction of 195-footrubblestonejetty opposite Wolfe's 
Point, and dredging channel 4.5 feet deep through obstructed 
channels; as modified under Section 107 authority 
the project provides for a channel 8 feet deep, 80 
feet wide from State channel in Casco Bay to commercial 
wharf at Yarmouth and anchorage of 8 acres, 6 feet deep 
downstream of Interstate 95 Highway Bridge. Project 
was completed in June 1969. (See Table 1-B at end of 
chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
1-10

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
Terminal facilities. Town has constructed public 
landing and launching ramp immediately below Interstate 
95 Highway Bridge on north bank. There are two 
boatyards equipped with floats, marine railways and 
launching ramps. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
contract for maintenance dredging of the Federal channel 
and anchorage was awarded on 14 September 1995. 
Work is expected to commence in November 1995. Hired 
labor costs included $13,300 for preparation of plans and 
specifications, $3,900 for supervision and inspection, 
$1,200 for contract processing and $52,800 for project 
condition surveys. 
23. SACO RIVER, ME 
Location. Rises in White Mountain region of New 
Hampshire at an elevation about 1,900 feet above sea 
level, flows about 105 miles in a general southeasterly 
direction, and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 16 
miles southwest of Portland, ME. (See National Ocean 
Survey Chart 13287.) 
Existing project. For description of completed existing 
portion of project see Annual Report for 1978. For a 
description of completed improvement of project see 
Annual Report for 1983. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter 
for Acts authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are five wharves of solid 
fill construction at Saco and Biddeford, none of which has 
railroad connection; and a small pier near mouth of river 
used for summer passenger business. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
final adjustment of $-91,678 for liquidated damages was 
made, reducing expenditures reported last fiscal year for 
maintenance dredging under a contract awarded in July 
1992 to $459,124. Work under the contract was completed 
in December 1993. Costs of $2,234 were incurred 
for project condition surveys. 
24. SAKONNET HARBOR, RI 
Location. Sakonnet Harbor, originally known as 
Church Cove, is located in the southwestern part of the 
town of Little Compton, Newport County, Rhode Island. 
It is about 30 miles southeast of Providence, and 5 miles 
east of Newport. The harbor is located at the eastern side 
of the entrance to the Sakonnet River, and directly 
adjoins the Atlantic Ocean at Block Island Sound. (See 
National Ocean Survey Chart 13221). 
Existing project. Provides for a breakwater 400 feet 
long in a northerly direction; a 400-foot extension in a 
northeasterly direction; removal of rock nearest the 
wharf to a depth of 8 feet and dredging the harbor to a 
depth of 8 feet. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts 
authorizing existing project). Original breakwater completed 
in 1900, extended in 1957. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are four wharves in the 
harbor, none of which are publicly owned. The Sakonnet 
Yacht Club pier on the east side of the harbor which 
projects about 300 feet from the shore has a float which 
makes it readily accessible to small craft. The three 
other wharves are located on the west side of the harbor. 
These wharves, for practical purposes, form one structure 
about 150 feet wide with two piers, 30 and 40 feet 
wide, projecting 35 and 70 feet therefrom. The piers are 
open to the public free of charge. The State highway 
located along two sides of the harbor provides access to 
the wharves. These facilities are adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Work 
under a continuing contract awarded in August 1994 for 
breakwater repairs was completed in December 1994. 
Contractor earnings this fiscal year were $122,480, bringing 
the total contract cost to $137,480. Hired labor costs 
included $9,200 for supervision and inspection, and $700 
for contract processing. 
25. SCARBORO RIVER, ME 
Location. Scarboro River is a small and generally 
shallow stream about 2.5 miles long which rises in the 
town of Scarboro, Maine, and empties into the north end 
of Saco Bay, immediately west of Prouts Neck. The 
project is located about 17 miles by water southeast of 
Portland, Maine. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 
231 and 1205.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel across the 
bar 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep and a channel 2,400 feet 
long, 100 feet wide, and 6 feet deep, leading to an 
anchorage of the same depth 1,350 feet long and 300 feet 
wide, and a jetty 800 feet long at tip of Pine Point. 
Construction of the project was completed in May 1962. 
(See Table 1-B at end of chaper for Act authorizing 
existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There is one wharf of pile and 
timber construction on Scarboro River, extending northerly 
from Pine Point almost to southerly limit of anchorage. 
Facility is owned by town of Scarboro and considered 
adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations duringfiscalyear. Maintenance: Hired 
labor costs in the amount of $9,654 were incurred for 
preparation of plans and specifications for proposed 
maintenance dredging and $19,900 for project condition 
surveys. 
26. SCITUATE HARBOR, MA 
Location. Scituate Harbor is located on the Atlantic 
coast about 14 miles southeast of the entrance to Boston 
Harbor and 33 miles northwest of the Massachusetts 
entrance to the Cape Cod Canal. (See U.S. Coast and 
Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 232 and 1207.) 
Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports 
for 1931 and 1938. 
1-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 
200 feet wide, 12 feet deep from that depth in Massachusetts 
Bay to a point 70 feet west of existing south jetty; a 
main harbor channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide 
extending from the existing 12 foot channel to a point 50 
feet south of the town wharf; an inner harbor channel 10 
feet deep, generally 150 feet wide extending approximately 
470 feet southerly from the main harbor channel; 
an anchorage basin along north side of the main harbor 
channel, 10 feet deep, 1,500 feet long, 460 feet in average 
width; an extension on the northwesterly side of the 10 
foot anchorage, 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide and 1,500 feet 
long; an inner anchorage basin 10 feet deep, 400 feet 
wide, and 900 feet long at the head of the inner harbor 
channel; the extension of the north jetty 300 feet in an 
easterly direction; and for maintenance of the extended 
north and the existing south jetties to lengths of 1,020 
and 450 feet respectively. The mean range of tide is 9.8 
feet. The extreme range is about 0.5 feet greater. The 
existing project was completed in July 1959. (See Table 
1-B at end of chapterfor Acts authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are three wharves, one 
formerly used for the receipt of coal and lumber, one 
owned by the town and used as a public landing, and one 
used as a yacht pier. None of these wharves has any 
railroad connection, but each has good highway facilities. 
No elaborate freight-handling machinery is available. 
The facilities appear to be adequate for existing 
demands. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
contract for repairs to the north jetty was awarded on 6 
July 1995. Work began in August 1995 and was about 90 
percent complete at fiscal year end with contractor earnings 
of $405,000. Hired labor costs included $28,700 for 
preparation of plans and specifications, $20,800 for supervision 
and inspection, and $1,600 for contract processing. 
Costs of $6,558 were incurred for project condition 
surveys. 
27. SEEKONK RIVER, PROVIDENCE, RI 
Location. The India Point Railroad Bridge is located 
at the mouth of the Seekonk River in Providence, Rhode 
Island. 
Existing project. Provides for the removal of the 
abandoned India Point Railroad Bridge at a currently 
estimated cost of $1,300,000. (See Table 1-B at end of 
chapter for Acts authorizing project.) 
Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not 
been requested yet. Local sponsors must transfer title of 
the bridge to the United States and provide 50 percent of 
construction costs. Revenue derived from the sale of 
scrap from the bridge shall be credited toward the non- 
Federal share of project costs. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preparation 
of project plans and specifications continued along 
with coordination with the Rhode Island State Historic 
Preservation Office to identify measures to mitigate for 
the removal of this historic bridge. A Post Authorization 
Change (PAC) report was completed in February 1994 
providing justification for increasing the cost of this 
project. 
28. SESUIT HARBOR, MA 
Location. Sesuit Harbor is located on the north shore 
of Dennis in Barnstable County, about 85 miles southeast 
of Boston, MA. The town of Dennis is bordered on 
the north by Cape Cod Bay, Brewster and Harwich on the 
east, Nantucket Sound on the south, and Yarmouth on 
the west. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13250.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep 
below mean low water and 100 feet wide from deep water 
in Cape Cod Bay to a point opposite the Dennis Yacht 
Club, thence reducing in width to 80 feet at the entrance 
to the inner harbor basin, for a total channel length of 
2,400 feet. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act 
authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 
August 1982. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance 
dredging of the entrance channel by the Government-
owned dredge CURRITUCK was performed from 
June 25, to June 28, 1995 at a rental cost of $31,000. A 
total of 2,940 cubic yards of sand were removed and 
placed in a nearshore area east of the entrance channel 
off Cold Storage Beach. Hired labor costs of$ 17,400 were 
incurred for performing and plotting pre- and afterdredge 
surveys and progress surveys. Afinal adjustment 
of $-30,813 was made, reducing expenditures reported 
last fiscal year for work bythe Government-owned dredge 
CURRITUCKto $143,187. Costs of $7,450 were incurred 
for project condition surveys. 
29. STONY CREEK, BRANFORD, CT 
Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound about 
8 miles east of New Haven near eastern boundary of 
Town of Branford, CT. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey 
Charts Nos. 217 and 1212.) 
Existing project. Provides for entrance channel 6 
feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water in Long Island 
Sound to a point 800 feet north of public wharf at Stony 
Creek, and maneuvering basin 6 feet deep totaling 3.5 
acres adjacent to channel north of wharf. (See Table 1- 
B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) 
Project was completed in January 1970. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are two marinas and a 
boatyard in the harbor with total storage area for 125 
boats, a public dock at Stony Creek equipped with two 
landing floats, and two landings which are privately 
operated. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
contract for maintenance dredging of the Federal channel 
and maneuvering basin was awarded in February 
1995. Dredging commenced in March 1995 and was 
completed on May 26, 1995 at a contract cost of $382,915. 
1-12

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
A total of 45,792 cubic yards of material were removed 
and disposed of at the Central Long Island Sound Disposal 
Site. Hired labor costs included $8,700 for preparation 
of plans and specifications, $41,400 for supervision 
and inspection, $16,900 for performing and plotting 
pre- and after-dredge surveys, and $1,600 for contract 
processing. 
30. WELLFLEET HARBOR, MA 
Location. On Cape Cod Bay, near southern end of the 
hook of Cape Cod, 12 miles southeast of Provincetown 
Harbor and 25 miles northeast of entrance to the Cape 
Cod Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 581 
and 1208.) 
Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 
1895. 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep 
and 125 feet wide from "Deep Hole" to town landing, and 
an anchorage basin of the same depth 800 feet by 500 
feet. The project depths refer to mean low water. The 
mean range of tide is 10 feet and the spring range is 11.6 
feet. The latest published map is contained in H. Doc. 
557, 76th Cong., 3d sess. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter 
for Acts authorizing existing project.) The channel was 
dredged to a depth of 4 feet in 1889. The Commonwealth 
of Massachusetts dredged the 6-foot channel in 1916. 
The existing project was completed in June 1958, with 
the construction of the 10-foot channel and anchorage 
basin. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are seven wharves in the 
harbor, only one of which is open to the public. The 
existing facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
continuing contract for maintenance dredging of the 
Federal channel and anchorage was awarded in October 
1994. Dredging commenced in November 1994 and was 
completed in January 1995 at a contract cost of $792,415. 
A total of 111,312 cubic yards of material were removed 
and disposed of at the Cape Cod Bay Disposal Site, 
formerly called the Wellfleet Disposal Site. Hired labor 
costs included $5,800 for preparation of plans and specifications, 
$37,900 for supervision and inspection, $13,800 
for performing and plotting after-dredge surveys, $2,300 
for contract processing, and $2,690 for project condition 
surveys. 
31. WOOD ISLAND HARBOR AND THE 
POOL AT BIDDEFORD ME 
Location. This harbor is situated at the southern end 
of Saco Bay, ME, immediately south of the mouth of the 
Saco River. It is 20 miles southwest of Portland, ME, and 
30 miles northeast of Portsmouth, NH. (See National 
Ocean Survey Chart 13286.) 
Existing project. Provides for a basin in the Pool 6 
feet deep, approximately 9.7 acres in extent, and three 
icebreakers south ofFishermen's Wharf. This work was 
completed in 1956. New work provides for a navigation 
channel from deep water in Wood Island Harbor to a 
point just inside the gut at Biddeford Pool. The channel 
is approximately 4,200 feet long, 100 feet wide and 10 
feet deep. This work was completed in 1992. (See Table 
1-B at end ofchapterfor Acts authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. 
Terminal facilities. There are five wharves in the 
harbor. Three are of pile and timber, and the other two 
are solid-fill construction. One wharf is used for the 
receipt of seafood, two are used in connection with a 
yacht club, and the remaining two are private. There is 
no public-owned wharf but one of the wharves is open to 
the public free of charge. None of the wharves have 
railroad connections. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A 
continuing contract for improvement dredging at Wood 
Island Harbor was awarded 5 March 1992. Work began 
in October 1992 and was completed the following month. 
Final contract amount was $243,393. Maintenance: Costs 
of $14,100 were incurred for project condition surveys. 
32. YORK HARBOR, ME 
Location. York Harbor is at the mouth of York River, 
a small stream emptying into the Atlantic Ocean, about 
12 miles northeast of Portsmouth, New Hampshire, and 
41 miles southwest of Portland, Maine. (See U.S. Coast 
and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 228 and 1205.) 
Previous project. Adopted by the act of 5 August 
1886. For further details see page 40 of Annual Report 
for 1907. 
Existing project. Provides for widening by 170 feet 
the channel off Bragdons Island to a depth of 10 feet, and 
for removing to the same depth the point of a projecting 
shoal just above the island; an 8-foot deep anchorage 
basin, north of Bragdons Island, with an average width 
of 320 feet and average length of 700 feet, approximately 
5.2 acres in area; and an 8-foot deep anchorage basin, 
south of Bragdons Island, with an average width of 450 
feet and average length of 550 feet, approximately 5.6 
acres in area. The existing project was completed in 
1961. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing 
existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are eight wharves in York 
Harbor. One, the combined hotel yacht club and Vinal's 
boat wharf is located on the northwest side of Stage Neck. 
Berth depth at this wharf is 13 feet. Five wharves and 
floats are located on the northeast side of the harbor. All 
have depths of 13 feet in their berths, and are open to the 
public without charge. Gasoline, water and supplies are 
available. There are two wharves on the west side of the 
harbor, the York Marine Service on Harris Island and 
the town wharf on Bragdon Island. 
Operations duringfiscalyear. Maintenance: Hired 
labor costs of $2,000 were incurred for preparation of 
1-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
plans and specifications for proposed maintenance dredging. 
Costs of$104,300 were incurred for project condition 
surveys. 
33. RECONNAISSANCE AND 
CONDITION SURVEYS 
(See Table 1-R at end of chapter.) 
34. OTHER AUTHORIZED 
NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(See Table 1-C at end of chapter.) 
35. NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, 
PUBLIC LAW 86-645 
(PREAUTHORIZATION) 
(See Table 1-H at end of chapter.) 
Alterations of Bridges 
36. AUTHORIZED BRIDGE 
ALTERATION 
Location. Chelsea Street Highway Bridge, MA. Construction 
was completed in October 1961 with a Federal 
cost of $138,518. In addition non-Federal contributed 
funds amounted to $8,062. For details see page 63 of 
Annual Report for 1962. 
Beach Erosion Control 
37. CLIFF WALK, NEWPORT, RI 
Location. Cliff Walk is located in Newport, Rhode 
Island about 25 miles south of Providence. The walkway 
faces the Atlantic Ocean near the mouth of Narragansett 
Bay on the south side ofAquidneck Island, and extends 
3.5 miles southward from the west end of Newport Beach 
to and around Lands End and thence northward to the 
east end of Baily Beach. (See Coast Guard and Geodetic 
Survey Coast Charts 236, 353, and 1210). 
Existing project. Provides for construction of intermittent 
shore protection measures at eroded locations 
along the 3.5 mile walkway. (See Table 1-B at end of 
chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Initial 
portion of the project was completed along 9,200 feet of 
shoreline extending from Newport Beach in September 
1972. The entire project could not be completed at that 
time due to lack of local funds. The City of Newport 
subsequently performed work along three of the most 
seriously damaged areas as a deterrent to continued 
erosion. Work along 110 feet of shoreline between 
Narragansett Avenue and Webster Street was completed 
in 1975, and along an 1,100 foot reach of the 
walkway in the vicinity of Sheep Point and a 300 foot 
reach between the existing project and Memorial Boulevard 
in 1976. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) 
was signed on 15 April 1994 between the Corps and the 
State of Rhode Island Department of Transportation for 
the new work. The project sponsor must assume all costs 
for the operation, maintenance, repair and rehabilitation 
of the project after completion, and ensure full, open 
and continued access of the general public along Cliff 
Walk. Construction" of the new work is to be performed 
by the project sponsor in accordance with the Government 
approved plans and specifications. The Government 
shall reimburse the project sponsor for 50 percent 
of total project costs up to the Federal limit of $750,000. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A 
contract for construction of shore protection measures 
was awarded 20 April 1994 by the project sponsor. Work 
began in May 1994 and was completed in August 1994. 
Government reimbursements totalled $750,000 for this 
work. 
38. PROSPECT BEACH, WEST HAVEN, 
CT 
Location. The city of West Haven is located in southcentral 
Connecticut along the northern shore of Long 
Island Sound about 90 miles northeast of New York City. 
Prospect Beach is located in West Haven between Seal 
Bluff Beach and Oyster River Point. 
Existing project. Provides for widening 6,000 feet of 
shoreline to a 100-150 foot width by direct placement of 
sand, starting about 350 feet south of South Street and 
extending northerly to Ivy Street; and construction of 
eight impermeable groins varying from 250 to 330 feet 
long. This work was completed by the State of Connecticut 
in May 1957. (For details see Annual Report for 
1958). New work provides for beach widening by the 
direct placement of suitable sandfill along 4,300 feet of 
shore front between Ivy Street and the groin structure 
just south of Tyler Avenue to form a berm 50 feet wide at 
elevation 12.0 feet mean low water and a dry beach width 
of approximately 137 feet above mean high water. This 
work was completed in 1994. New work also includes 
periodic beach nourishment as required over the 50-year 
economic life of the project. (See Table 1-B at end of 
chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A 
contract for construction of shore protection and erosion 
control measures at Prospect Beach was awarded 29 
October 1992. Work began in December 1992 and was 
completed in May 1994. Final contract amount was 
$2,269,827. 
39. SANDY POINT OUTFALL, WEST 
HAVEN, CT 
Location. Sandy Point is a 3,500 foot long sand spit 
located along the western shore of New Haven Harbor. 
Existing project. The proposed project involves the 
construction of 1,000 linear feet of concrete block revet- 
1-14

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
ment to protect an existing sewerline from further erosion 
and storm damage. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter 
for Act authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement 
was signed on 11 April 1995 between the Corps and 
the State of Connecticut. The project sponsor must 
provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged 
material disposal areas and relocations necessary for 
project construction; pay a cash contribution in the 
amount necessary to bring the non-Federal share of 
project costs including lands to 35 percent; assume all 
costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; 
and assume all costs for the maintenance and repair of 
the project after completion. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract 
for construction of shore protection and erosion 
control measures at Sandy Point was awarded 9 June 
1995. The contractor began mobilization by fiscal year 
end. 
40. SEA BLUFF BEACH, WEST HAVEN, 
CT 
Location. Sea Bluff Beach is located on the southcentral 
coast of Connecticut, on Long Island Sound, in 
the city of West Haven and extends approximately 1,000 
feet southwest from the mouth of Cove River to the 
eastern end of Prospect Beach. 
Existing project. Beach widening by the direct 
placement of a suitable sandfill along approximately 
1,000 feet of shorefront and providing for a 50-foot wide 
level beach berm. Also included is the reconstruction of 
the existing rock groin structure located on the southwestern 
end of the beach. (See Table 1-B at end of 
chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Initial 
sandfill and groin reconstuction were completed in December 
1990. New work involves periodic beach nourishment 
over the 50-year economic life of the project. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. In accordance with the Local Cooperation 
Agreement signed 27 November 1989 between the Corps 
and the City of West Haven, the project sponsor must 
pay 35 percent of the total cost for periodic beach 
nourishment. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A 
contract for periodic beach nourishment of Sea Bluff 
Beach was awarded 21 March 1995. Work began in May 
1995 and was completed later that month. Final contract 
amount was $162,079. 
41. SOUTHEAST LIGHTHOUSE, 
BLOCK ISLAND, RI 
Location. Southeast Lighthouse is located atop a 
150-foot bluffon the southeast tip of Block Island in the 
town of New Shoreham, RI. The lighthouse was first 
illuminated in 1875 and has been a popular tourist 
attraction for over a century. It is the highest lighthouse 
in New England, visible from 35 miles at sea, and its 
237,000 candle power is the strongest on the Atlantic 
coast. 
Existing project. Provides for all work necessary to 
relocate Southeast Lighthouse and the attached dwelling 
some 245 feet away from the eroding bluff. (See Table 
1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
(LCA) was signed on April 5, 1992 between the Corps, the 
Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management 
and the Southeast Lighthouse Foundation. This 
agreement was modified on 21 January 1993 to reflect 
amended cost-sharing requirements of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992, which limits non- 
Federal costs to $970,000. Local interests must furnish 
all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide 50 percent 
of project costs for relocating Southeast Lighthouse 
up to the non-Federal statutory limit of $970,000; and 
bear all costs for operation and maintenance of the 
lighthouse after project completion. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A 
competitive services contract for the relocation of Southeast 
Lighthouse was awarded 12 February 1993. Work 
began in March 1993 and was completed in August 1994. 
Final contract amount was $2,267,699. 
42. WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT 
Location. Woodmont Beach is located on the northern 
shore of Long Island Sound in the borough of 
Woodmont, city of Milford about five miles southwest of 
New Haven, CT and some 82 miles northeasterly of New 
York City. 
Existing project. Provides for Federal participation 
in the amount of one-third of the first cost of protection 
and improvement of those portions of the shore which are 
publicly owned by widening to a width of 100 feet by 
direct placement of sand, 500 feet of shore in the first 
pocket beach west of Merwin Point; widening to a width 
of 100-150 feet, 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street 
northerly to a point about 400 feet north of Anderson 
Avenue; and construction of five impermeable groins 300 
to 400 feet long. This work was completed by the State 
of Connecticut in 1959. (For details see Annual Report 
for 1961.) 
New work provides for the direct placement of sandfill 
along approximately 1,500 feet of beach between Clinton 
and Bonsilene Streets to form a berm 50 feet wide, 
reconstruction of the Usher Road/Dunbar Street and 
Bonsilene Street groins, and mitigation to replace rocky 
habitat for Blue Mussels lost as a result of sand placement. 
This work was completed in 1994. New work also 
includes periodic beach nourishment as required over 
the 50-year economic life of the project. (See Table 1-B at 
end of chapter for Acts authorizing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A 
continuing contract for construction of shore protection 
and erosion control measures at Woodmont Beach was 
awarded 21 August 1992. Work began in December 1992 
and was completed in February 1994. Final contract 
amount was $1,301,586. 
1-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
43. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
BEACH EROSION CONTROL 
PROJECTS 
An inspection of Sea Bluff Beach in West Haven, 
Connecticut was conducted in fiscal year 1995, which 
determined that periodic nourisment was required. 
44. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH 
EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Table 1-D at end of chapter.) 
45. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 
ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 
(PREAUTHORIZATION) 
(See Table 1-I at end of chapter.) 
46. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 111, 
PUBLIC LAW 90-483 
(PREAUTHORIZATION) 
(See Table 1-J at end of chapter.) 
Flood Control 
47. ALLENDALE DAM, NORTH 
PROVIDENCE, RI 
Location. Allendale Dam is located along the 
Woonasquatucket River which forms the boundary line 
between the towns of North Providence and Johnston, 
Rhode Island. 
Existing project. Provides for the reconstruction of 
the Allendale Dam. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for 
Act authorizing project.) 
Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not 
been requested yet. The project sponsor must obtain title 
to the Allendale Dam; provide all lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, dredged material disposal areas and relocations 
necessary for project construction; pay a cash 
contribution in the amount necessary to bring the non- 
Federal shore of project costs including lands to 25 
percent; and assume all costs for the operation and 
maintenance of the project after completion. 
Operations during fiscal year. Began preparation 
of project plans and specifications. Current cost estimate 
exceeds the maximum project cost limit under Section 
902 of Public Law 99-662. A post authorization change 
is required prior to construction. 
48. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA 
AND RI 
Works covered by this plan include a dam and reservoir 
on West River and local protection works at three 
cities on Blackstone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 
authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local 
protection works at Worcester, MA, and Woonsocket and 
Pawtucket, RI, substantially in accordance with House 
Document 624, 78th Congress, 2nd session. Flood Control 
Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project 
at lower Woonsocket, RI, substantially in accordance 
with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2nd Session. 
Local protection nonstructural project authorized in 1982 
for Belmont Park section of Warwick, RI, along the 
Pawtuxet River. Streambank protection projects on the 
Blackstone River in Millbury, MA, and on the Clear 
River in Burrillville, RI, were authorized in 1985. (See 
Table 1-M at end of chapter on Reservoir and Local 
Protection Projects, Blackstone River Basin, for projects 
comprising authorized plan.) 
48A. WEST HILL DAM, MA 
Location. Dam is on West River, MA, three miles 
above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles 
northeast of Uxbridge, MA. (See Geological Survey maps 
Blackstone, MA and RI, Milford, MA, and Grafton, MA.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Work on contract for 
dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 
1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational 
facilities was completed in June 1967. 
Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 
1944 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. The project 
was selected for the Division's Project of the Year Safety 
Award and for the National Water Safety Congressional 
Award of merit as a result of an outstanding water safety 
community outreach program. 
49. BLUFFS COMMUNITY CENTER, 
SWANSEA, MA 
Location. The town of Swansea is located in southeastern 
Massachusetts about 12 miles east of Providence, 
Rhode Island. The Bluffs Community Center is 
located on Ocean Grove Beach in the town of Swansea. 
Existing project. Provides for the construction of 
300 feet of rock revetment along the seaward side of the 
Bluffs Community Center to protect it from wave attack. 
This work was completed in 1994. (See Table 1-B at end 
of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final 
project costs were apportioned between the Federal and 
non-Federal accounts. 
50. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL 
VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA 
Location. The Charles River extends inland from 
1-16

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the 
Massachusetts-Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles 
long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. 
Existing project. The project provides for Federal 
acquisition and protection of 17 natural valley storage 
areas totalling 8,102 acres in what is known as the 
Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. The 
acquisition in fee or by easement of the major natural 
valley storage areas within the Charles River watershed 
is intended as a multiple-purpose project for flood control, 
recreation, and fish and wildlife management. (See 
Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing 
project.) Land acquisition is complete. 
A total of 3,210 acres have been acquired in fee at a 
cost of $2,152,853 and restrictive easements have been 
obtained for 4,892 acres at a cost of $591,193. 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required to 
prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, 
utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements 
that might affect the drainage characteristics of the 
natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to 
restrict development of flood plain lands; and operate 
and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. 
Local assurances were provided by the Commonwealth 
of Massachusetts. 
Operations duringfiscalyear. Maintenance: Hired 
labor costs for ordinary maintenance activities, project 
surveillance and inspection, as well as land use administration, 
were $157,182. 
51. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, 
NH, MA AND CT 
Location. Works covered by this project are a series 
of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut 
River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, 
within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, CT, and local 
protection works at several cities in the basin. 
Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as 
amended by Act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction 
of ten reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River 
in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th 
Congress, 2nd session, as the same may be revised upon 
further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 
1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control 
of floods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, 
as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress, 2nd 
session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of 
local flood protection projects in the plan. Act of October 
15, 1940, modified Act of June 18, 1938, to provide 
additional protection at East Hartford, CT, as set forth in 
House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session. Act of 
August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved 
in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House 
Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and House 
Document 724, 76th Congress, 3rd session, with such 
further modifications as may be found justifiable in 
discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. 
Latter Act also authorized to be appropriated 
additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 
million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further 
modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook 
conduit at Hartford, CT. Flood Control Act of 1944 
authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to 
previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved 
in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration 
of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water 
Conservation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir 
in West River Basin, VT; directing consultation with 
affected States during course ofinvestigations and transmission 
of proposal and plans to each affected State for 
written views and recommendations forreservoir projects 
heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, 
Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and 
resubmission of projects or modifications for construction 
of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified 
project for flood control at Hartford, CT, authorized by 
Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended to include Folly 
Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified 
plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to 
provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at 
South Keene, NH, in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs 
heretofore authorized. This Act further modified plan for 
West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to 
consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain, The Island, 
and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs 
authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control 
Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut 
River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir 
on Middle Branch of Westfield River, MA, and Mad 
River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, CT. Flood 
Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut 
River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee 
River, MA, substantially in accordance with House Document 
434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on 
Westfield River, MA, substantially in accordance with 
Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood 
control and related purposes on Farmington River, CT, 
substantially in accordance with House Document 443, 
86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included 
authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for 
construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook 
in Keene, NH, substantially in accordance with Senate 
Document 60, 90th Congress; and plan for protection on 
Park River, CT, substantially in accordance with Senate 
Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 
deauthorized the construction of a reservoir at Claremont, 
NH. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 
deauthorized the construction of Gaysville Lake, VT 
project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, 
Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, 
Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, VT; Honey Hill Lake, 
West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill 
Reservoir, NH, were deauthorized in August 1977 in 
accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver 
Brook Lake, NH project expired in April 1978 due to lack 
oflocal cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, 
MA, West Springfield, MA, Hartford, VT, Wethersfield, 
CT, and Keene, NH authorized and constructed in accordance 
with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. Emergency 
streambank erosion control projects at Brownsville, 
1-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
VT; Conway, MA; Huntington, MA; Charlestown, NH; 
North Stratford, NH; Colchester, CT; Middletown, CT; 
Milford, CT; and Simsbury, CT authorized in accordance 
with Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act were 
completed. (See Table 1-N at end of chapter for reservoirs 
and local protection works for Connecticut River Basin.) 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified the 
comprehensive plan for the control of flood-waters in the 
Connecticut River Basin, Vermont, New Hampshire, 
Massachusetts, and Connecticut, authorized by Section 
5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1572) by authorizing 
the design, construction, operation, and maintenance 
of facilities at Townshend Dam, West River, VT to 
enable upstream migrant adult Atlantic salmon to bypass 
that dam and Ball Mountain Dam, VT, and to 
provide at both Townshend and Ball Mountain Dams 
facilities as necessary for the downstream passage of 
juvenile Atlantic salmon. This work was completed in 
February 1993. 
51A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT 
Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its 
junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT. It is 
two miles north of village of Jamaica, VT. (See Geological 
Survey map for Londonderry, VT.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvements 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1994. Construction of dam and appurtenant 
works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in 
November 1961. Cost of work was $10,448,000 for 
construction and $350,000 for lands and damages, a total 
of $10,798,000. Construction of recreation facilities was 
initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Fish 
passage facility work began in June 1992 and was completed 
in February 1993. Project is complete. Project is 
a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other 
purposes in Connecticut River Basin. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
contract to repair Slason Road Bridge was awarded 17 
August 1995. Work had not begun by fiscal year end. A 
contract to reinforce rock slopes was awarded 3 August 
1995. Work had not begun by fiscal year end. A contract 
to replace fuel tanks at Townshend and Ball Mountain 
Lakes was awarded 30 June 1995. Work had not begun 
by fiscal year end. A contract to replace the emergency 
generator was awarded 22 June 1995. Contractor working 
on administrative phase of contract at fiscal year end. 
51B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA 
Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre, 
MA, 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift 
Rivers. It is 13 miles northwest of Worcester, MA. (See 
Geological Survey maps for Barre, MA and Wachusett 
Mountain, MA.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and 
completed in May 1958. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. A second 
contract to repair fire damage to the Environmental 
Laboratory was awarded 19 July 1994. Work began the 
following month and was completed in July 1995. Contractor 
earnings totalled $323,298 with final payment 
pending at fiscal year end. A contract for concrete repairs 
at the gatehouse and outlet works was awarded 30 
January 1995. Work began in April 1995 and was about 
a third complete at fiscal year end with contractor earnings 
of $51,030. 
51C. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA 
Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above 
its junction with the Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles 
east of South Royalston, MA and 7.5 miles northwest of 
city of Gardner, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for 
Royalston and Winchendon, MA-NH and Templeton, 
MA) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and 
completed in February 1942. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 
as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational 
development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water 
Project Recreation Act. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. 
51D. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT 
Location. Damsite is in town ofColebrook, Litchfield 
County, CT, on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 
miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at 
Riverton, CT, and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin 
(Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, 
CT.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and 
completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation 
facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in 
June 1970. 
Local cooperation. Water supply contract was 
signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. 
Repayment is being made in accordance with provisions 
of 1958 Water Supply Act. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance. Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. A contract 
1-18

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
to paint the Gate Chamber was awarded on 29 March 
1994. Work began in August 1994 and was completed in 
September 1994. Final contract amount was $24,246. A 
contract to replace fuel storage tanks at Thomaston 
Dam, Hop Brook Lake, Black Rock Lake and Colebrook 
Lake was awarded on 23 March 1994. Work began in 
May 1994 and was completed in April 1995. Contractor 
earnings totalled $21,307 for Colebrook River Lake with 
final payment pending at fiscal year end. 
51E. CONANT BROOK DAM, MA 
Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts 
in town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, 
is about two miles southeast of community of Monson, 
MA. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, MA.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, 
highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in 
June 1964 and completed in December 1966. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. 
51F. CONNECTICUT RIVER, 
MIDDLETOWN, CT 
Location. The city of Middletown is located in 
Middlesex County, in the lower Connecticut Valley, in 
south-central Connecticut. Middletown is approximately 
15 miles south of Hartford, CT and 20 miles north of New 
Haven, CT. The project is located along the Connecticut 
River in the vicinity of River Road at the intersection 
with Eastern Drive, approximately 6,500 feet downstream 
of the Arrigoni (Route 66) Bridge. 
Existing project. The project consists of 500 linear 
feet of 6-inch concrete paving block protection underlain 
by a 1-foot layer of gravel bedding and riprap toe protection 
along River Road. This work was completed in 1994. 
(See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing 
existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work. A 
contract for construction of emergency streambank protection 
measures along the Connecticut River was 
awarded 9 November 1992. Work began in August 1993 
and was completed in June 1994. Final contract amount 
was $199,760. 
51G. FARMINGTON RIVER, 
SIMSBURY, CT 
Location. The town of Simsbury is located in the 
central portion of Hartford County in north-central Connecticut, 
approximately 25 miles east of the New York- 
Connecticut state line and 14 miles northwest of the city 
of Hartford, CT. 
Existing project. The proposed project includes concrete 
grid block and stone slope protection along 900 feet 
of eroding Farmington River streambank. The project 
will protect the river bank and an adjacent three-foot 
diameter sewer trunk line. (See Table 1-B at end of 
chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
(LCA) was signed 19 February 1993 between the Corps 
and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. 
The project sponsor must provide all lands, 
easements, rights-of-way, including dredged material 
disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined 
by the Government to be necessary for project construction; 
provide during the period of construction a minimum 
cash contribution of five percent of total project 
costs; provide during the period of construction an additional 
cash contribution so that the total contribution 
including lands equals 25 percent of total project costs; 
assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost 
limitation of $500,000; and bear all costs for maintenance 
of the project after completion. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A second 
contract for construction of emergency streambank protection 
measures along the Farmington River was 
awarded 31 January 1995. Work began in March 1995 
and was 90 percent complete at fiscal year end with 
contractor earnings of $312,071. 
51H. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA 
Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles 
above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is four 
miles north of town of Huntington, MA, and about 12 
miles west of city of Northampton, MA. (See Geological 
Survey map for Westhampton, MA.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 
and completed in December 1941. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. A contract 
for concrete repairs at the gatehouse was awarded on 
3 February 1995. Work began in June and was completed 
in August 1995. Final contract amount was 
$132,833. 
51I. LANCASTER, ISRAEL RIVER, NH 
Location. Lancaster is located in northern New 
Hampshire along the Vermont State line at the confluence 
of the Connecticut and Israel Rivers. The Israel River 
has a length of about 21 miles and a drainage area of 135 
square miles. 
1-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
Existing project. The local ice jam flood protection 
project provides for an earth and rock-filled embankment 
weir, 160 feet long, protected by layers of gabions, 
which are rock-filled baskets. Fish passage through the 
wier is assured by four concrete sluiceways. The sluiceways 
are four feet wide and are provided with stop-log 
slots. Stop-logs are inserted each year in the late fall to 
ensure a winter pool behind the weir and are removed 
each spring. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act 
authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 
1981 at a total cost of $551,605. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Funds 
of $142 were used to continue preparation of an Embankment 
Criteria and Performance Report to assess the 
current condition and past performance of the project, 
and to determine if remedial measures are needed to 
improve its effectiveness and minimize maintenance 
costs. 
51J. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA 
Location. Dam is on Middle Branch of Westfield 
River, one mile above its confluence with main stem of 
Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of 
Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town of 
Chester, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Chester, 
MA.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent 
contract in June 1962 and completed in September 
1965. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 
applies and fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. A contract 
was awarded on 26 April 1994 to stabilize rock in the 
outlet channel. Work began in August 1994 and was 
completed in November 1994. Final contract amount 
was $118,215. 
51K. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT 
Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 1.5 miles 
above its junction with Connecticut River, and one mile 
northwest of North Hartland, VT. Reservoir extends 
upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for 
Hanover NH-VT.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. A contract 
to replace an underground fuel tank was awarded on 9 
December 1993. Work began in February 1994 and was 
completed in July 1994. Final contract amount was 
$36,658. A contract to modify the electrical switchboard 
was awarded 23 June 1994. Work began in November 
1994 and was completed in February 1995. Final contract 
amount was $32,600. 
51L. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT 
Location. Dam is in town of Springfield, VT, on Black 
River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut 
River, and three miles northwest of Springfield, VT. (See 
Geological Survey maps for Ludlow, VT, and Claremont, 
NH.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 
1960. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 
A contract to repair spillway bridge deck and 
miscellaneous concrete was awarded on 5 May 1994. 
Work began in August 1994 and was completed in September 
1994. Final contract amount was $58,750. 
51M. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH 
Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles upstream 
from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles 
to Ashuelot River at Keene, NH. (See National Ocean 
Survey maps for Keene, NH-VT, and Monadnock, NH.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 
and completed in August 1958. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 
A contract to repair concrete at the entrance and 
exit bridges was awarded on 25 May 1995. Work began 
in July 1995 and was completed in September 1995. 
Conractor earnings totalled $136,843 with final payment 
pending at fiscal year end. 
51N. RIVERDALE, WEST 
SPRINGFIELD, MA 
Location. The town of West Springfield is situated in 
southwestern Massachusetts on the west bank of the 
Connecticut River, about 90 miles west of Boston, MA 
and 135 miles northwest of New York City. Riverdale is 
in the northern portion of the town of West Springfield, 
MA. 
1-20

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
Existing project. The project involved the construction 
of approximately 12,700 feet of earth levee, two 
pumping stations and three stop-log structures. The 
project, with the approved plan of upstream reservoirs, 
is designed to protect against a flood greater than any of 
record. The project is a unit of the comprehensive plan 
of flood control and other purposes in the Connecticut 
River Basin and was authorized by the Flood Control Act 
approved August 18, 1941. Construction of this work 
was initiated in April 1949 and completed in December 
1950. (For details see Annual Report for 1950.) 
A plan of improvement authorized in 1987 calls for the 
expansion of the gravity outflow and pumping capacity of 
the existing Riverdale Pumping Station. This includes 
adding a 24-inch diesel powered pump into the existing 
station. The proposed project also includes jacking a 
separate 5-foot diameter, reinforced concrete culvert 
through the dike, running parallel to the existing culvert 
to increase the gravity outflow capacity. The new gravity 
conduit will be equipped with an ungated inlet and an 
outlet structure which includes a self contained, electronically 
operated sluice gate. During emergencies, the 
gate could be operated manually from a new bridge and 
tower structure on the river side of the dike. An existing 
nine-foot diameter culvert, about 400 feet downstream 
on Bagg Brook will be replaced with a realigned 8-foot x 
13-foot corrugated metal arch and a 50-foot long transition 
aligned to tie smoothly into the existing downstream 
channel. Project cost estimate for the modification is 
$1,060,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts 
authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was 
signed on July 16, 1992 between the Corps and the 
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management 
for new work. The local sponsor shall be solely 
responsible for operating, maintaining, replacing, and 
rehabilitating the project after construction; provide 
during the period of construction a minimum cash contribution 
of five percent of total project costs; provide all 
lands, easements, rights-of-way, including dredged material 
disposal areas, and perform all relocations and 
alterations of buildings, utilities, highways and sewers 
determined by the Government to be necessary for construction 
of the project; provide during the period of 
construction an additional cash contribution so that the 
total contribution equals 25 percent of total project costs; 
prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction 
of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the 
level of protection it affords, or that would hinder operation 
and maintenance; and the local sponsor will assume 
full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the 
Federal statutory cost limitation of $5 million. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract 
for improvements to the Riverdale Pumping Station 
was awarded 24 June 1994. Work began in August 
1994 and was about 75 percent complete at fiscal year 
end with contractor earnings of $534,494. 
510. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH 
Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6 miles above 
its junction with Connecticut River and five miles north 
of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene 
and Bellows Falls, NH-VT.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 
and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional 
recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary 
phase in 1980. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 
A contract was awarded on 21 April 1994 to 
renovate beach restrooms. Work began in May 1994 and 
was completed in August 1994. Final contract amount 
was $40,247. A contract for miscellaneous concrete and 
bridge repairs was awarded 14 June 1995. Work began 
in July 1995 and was about half complete at fiscal year 
end with contractor earnings of $85,826. 
51P. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT 
Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its 
junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT, and 
about two miles west of Townshend, VT. Reservoir extends 
upstream about four miles. (See Geological Survey 
maps for Saxtons River, VT, and Londonderry, VT.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvements 
and authorization legislation, see Annual 
Report for 1994. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a 
coordinated system for flood control in Connecticut River 
Basin. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was 
initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. 
Cost of work was $5,530,000 for construction and 
$1,870,000 for lands and damages including highway 
relocations and utilities, a total of $7,400,000. Initial 
phase of additional recreational facilities completed in 
October 1969 and secondary phase completed in September 
1971. Fish passage facility work began in June 
1992 and was completed in February 1993. Project is 
complete. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 
A contract to repair a scour hole was awarded 18 
August 1995. Work had not begun by fiscal year end. A 
contract to replace fuel tanks at Townshend and Ball 
Mountain was awarded 30 June 1995. Work had not 
begun by fiscal year end. 
51Q. TULLY LAKE, MA 
Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 
miles above its junction with Millers River. It is one mile 
north of Fryville, MA, and 3.5 miles north of Athol, MA. 
(See Geological Survey map for Royalston, MA-NH.) 
1-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and 
completed in September 1949. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of 
future recreational development, in accordance with 
1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. A contract to 
replace boilers and remove asbestos was awarded 31 
March 1995. Work began in May 1995 and was completed 
in September 1995. Contractor earnings totalled 
$17,055 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. A 
contract to repair the Doane Hill Road and spillway 
bridges was awarded 29 June 1995. Contractor mobilized 
in August 1995 and began work on pavement 
demolition. Contractor earnings totalled $3,900 at fiscal 
year end. 
51R. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT 
Location. Dam is on Ompompanoosuc River, four 
miles above its junction with Connecticut River. Itis onefourth 
mile north of Union Village, VT, and 11 miles 
north of White River Junction, VT. (See Geological Survey 
maps for Strafford, VT and Mount Cube, NH-VT.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June 1950. 
Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. A contract to 
repave the main access road was awarded 19 May 1995. 
Work was initiated in August 1995 and completed the 
following month. Contractor earnings totalled $83,526 
with final payment pending at fiscal year end. A contract 
for scaling and removing loose rocks from two slopes was 
awarded 9 June 1995. Work began the following month 
and was completed in August 1995. Final contract 
amount was $23,900. 
52. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT 
AND MA 
Seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the 
Naugatuck River, principal tributary of the Housatonic 
River, and three local protection projects have been 
specifically authorized as part of an overall plan for flood 
control in the Housatonic River Basin. The Naugatuck 
and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of 
Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and 
clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the 
Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained 
in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. 
Emergency bank protection projects at: Alford, Green 
River, MA; Sheffield, MA; Salisbury, CT; and Squantz 
Pond, Fairfield, CT were authorized under authority 
provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. 
Projects for local flood protection for: West Branch, 
Torrington, CT; East Branch, Torrington, CT; Mad River, 
Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT; Pittsfield, MA; and 
Waterbury-Watertown, CT, were authorized under authority 
provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control 
Act. (See Table 1-0 on dams, reservoirs, and local protection 
projects for Housatonic River Basin.) 
52A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT 
Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook, about two 
miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck 
River, in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, CT. (See 
Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Road relocation completed 
in November 1967. Contract for construction of 
dam and appurtenances was initiated in July 1967 and 
completed in July 1971. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. However, local interests must establish 
encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient 
reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment 
of such lines. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 
A contract to replace emergency generators at 
Black Rock and Hop Brook Dams was awarded on 23 
October 1993. Work began in February 1994 and was 
completed in December 1994. Contractor earnings totalled 
$98,255, of which $49,726 was for work at Black 
Rock Lake. A contract to replace fuel storage tanks at 
Colebrook Lake, Thomaston Dam, Hop Brook Lake and 
Black Rock Lake was awarded on 23 March 1994. Work 
began in May 1994 and was completed in April 1995. 
Final contract amount was $33,334 for work at Black 
Rock Lake. A contract to construct seepage weir toe 
drains and emergency access road was awarded 24 May 
1995. Work began in July 1995 and was virtually 
complete by fiscal year end with contractor earnings of 
$90,695. 
52B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT 
Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook, in town of Plymouth, 
CT, about 3.4 miles above its confluence with 
Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, 
CT.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 
and completed in August 1966. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. However, local interests must establish 
encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient 
reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment 
of such lines. 
1-22

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. 
52C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT 
Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook, in city of Waterbury 
and towns ofMiddlebury and Naugatuck, CT, about 
1.4 miles upstream of confluence of Naugatuck River and 
Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, 
CT.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 
1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of 
a public use facility was completed in November 1973. 
Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 
1980. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. However, local interests must establish 
encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient 
reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment 
of such lines. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. A contract 
to replace emergency generators at Hop Brook and Black 
Rock was awarded on 23 October 1993. Work began in 
February 1994 and was completed in December 1994. 
Contractor earnings totalled $98,255 of which $48,529 
was for work at Hop Brook Lake. A contract to replace 
fuel storage tanks at Colebrook Lake, Thomaston Dam, 
Black Rock Lake and Hop Brook Lake was awarded on 23 
March 1994. Work began in May 1994 and was completed 
in April 1995. Contractor earnings totalled $26,361 
for Hop Brook Lake with final payment pending at fiscal 
year end. 
52D. MAD RIVER, WATERBURY 
(WOODTICK AREA), CT 
Location. The City of Waterbury is located in westcentral 
Connecticut, about 20 miles north of New Haven, 
Connecticut and about 25 miles southwest of Hartford, 
Connecticut. The Woodtick area of Waterbury is located 
along the Mad River between Sharon and Frost Road 
Bridges and consists primarily of residential development 
including several apartment and condominium 
complexes, some light manufacturing companies, and a 
large shopping mall. 
Existing project. Provides for widening and deepening 
the existing channel along two restricted areas of the 
Mad River, totaling 1,450 linear feet. (See Table 1-B at 
end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
(LCA) was signed on 2 June 1993 between the Corps and 
the State of Connecticut Department of Environmental 
Protection. The project sponsor shall provide all lands, 
easements, rights-of-way, including dredged material 
disposal areas, and perform all relocations and alterations 
of building, utilities, highways, railroads, and 
bridges determined by the Government to be necessary 
for construction of the project; pay a cash contribution in 
the amount necessary to bring the non-Federal share of 
project costs to 25 percent (a minimum cash contribution 
of 5 percent is required); assume all costs in excess of the 
Federal statutory limitation of $5,000,000; and bear all 
operation, maintenance and repair costs of the project 
after completion. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued 
to assist the project sponsor in acquiring the necessary 
lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project 
construction. 
52E. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT 
Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook, about 1.3 
miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck 
River, in town ofThomaston, CT. (See Geological Survey 
map for Thomaston, CT.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed 
in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities 
was initiated in November 1966 and completed in 
August 1967. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. However, local interests must establish 
encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient 
reservoir operation. State legislation requires 
establishment of such lines. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. A contract to 
renovate restrooms and water supply systems at 
Northfield Brook Lake and Thomaston Dam was awarded 
18 August 1995. Work had not begun by fiscal year end. 
52F. THOMASTON DAM, CT 
Location. On Naugatuck River, about 30.4 miles 
above its junction with Housatonic River, and aou 1.6 
miles north of Thomaston, CT. Reservoir extends upstream 
about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for 
Thomaston, CT.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and 
completed in November 1960. 
Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 
1944 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 
A contract to replace fuel storage tanks at 
Colebrook Lake, Hop Brook Lake, Black Rock Lake and 
Thomaston Dam was awarded on 23 March 1994. Work 
began in May 1994 and was completed in April 1995. 
Final contract amount was $36,839 for work at Thomaston 
Dam. A contract to repair the spillway bridge and dam 
1-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
embankment was awarded 25 July 1994. Work began in 
September 1994 and was completed in September 1995. 
Contractor earnings totalled $233,709 with final payment 
pending at fiscal year end. A contract to renovate 
restrooms and water supply systems at Thomaston Dam 
and Northfield Brook Lake was awarded 18 August 
1995. Work had not begun by fiscal year end. 
53. MACHIAS RIVER, MACHIASPORT, 
ME 
Location. The town of Machiasport is located along 
the northeast coast of Maine approximately 70 miles 
southeast of Bangor, Maine. 
Existing project. Construction of stone slope protection 
along 380 feet of eroding streambank adjacent to 
State Highway Route 92 was completed in 1994. (See 
Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing 
project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final 
project costs were apportioned between the Federal and 
non-Federal accounts. 
54. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, 
NH AND MA 
Works covered by comprehensive plan are on 
Merrimack River and its tributaries in New Hampshire 
and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized 
construction of a system of flood control reservoirs 
in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights 
in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved 
general comprehensive plan for flood control and other 
purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to 
preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by 
Act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in 
addition to construction of a system of flood control 
reservoirs, related flood control works which may be 
found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations 
pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are 
now carried on under and reported under projects for 
individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. 
No further expenditures are contemplated under general 
project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. 
For final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report 
for 1946. 
A comprehensive plan for development of water resources 
of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal 
tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 
1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with 
Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for 
construction of coordinated system offour reservoirs and 
three local protection projects for flood protection, water 
supply, recreation and allied purposes. Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 deauthorized two of the reservoirs 
and one of the local protection projects. 
The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction 
of Saxonville local protection project substantially in 
accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. 
Emergency streambank protection projects at Amesbury, 
MA and two in Leominster, MA were authorized under 
authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood 
Control Act. (See Table 1-P at end of chapter for reservoirs 
and related flood control works for Merrimack 
River Basin.) 
54A. BLACKWATER DAM, NH 
Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, 8.2 miles 
above confluence with Contoocook River, and 118.8 miles 
above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of 
Webster, NH, just above village of Swetts Mills, NH, 18 
miles by highway northwest of Concord, NH. (See Geological 
Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, 
NH.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete except for construction 
of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant 
works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in 
November 1941. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. A contract to 
rehab hydraulic system was awarded 18 August 1993. 
Work began in 1993 and was completed in March 1994. 
Final contract amount was $39,102. A contract for 
miscellaneous repairs at Hopkinton - Everett Lakes and 
Blackwater Dam was awarded 17 July 1995. Work 
began in August 1995 at Blackwater Dam with contractor 
earnings of $18,558 at fiscal year end. 
54B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH 
Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of 
Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of 
West Peterborough, NH, and 14 miles east of Keene, NH. 
(See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Monadnock, 
NH.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and 
completed in March 1950. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 
A contract was awarded on 19 November 1993 
for wing-wall repairs. Work began in August 1994 and 
was completed the following month. Final contract 
amount was $60,616. 
1-24

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
54C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH 
Location. Dam is on Pemigewasset River, main tributary 
of Merrimack River, and about 2.5 miles upstream 
of Franklin, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for 
Penacook and Holderness, NH.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 
and completed in October 1943. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. A second 
contract for deleading and repainting the service bridge 
was awarded 12 September 1994. Work began in January 
1995 and was completed in Augsut 1995. Contractor 
earnings totalled $85,719 with final payment pending at 
fiscal year end. A contract to repair Lower Mill Brook 
Bridge was awarded on 21 April 1994. Work began in 
June 1994 and was completed in August 1994. Final 
contract amount was $20,564. 
54D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, 
NH 
Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook River, 
17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and 
about one-half mile upstream from village of West 
Hopkinton, NH. Everett Dam is on PiscataquogRiver, 16 
miles above its junction with Merrimack River, and 
about 1.3 miles southeast of village of EastWeare, NH. 
Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the 
two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological 
Survey map for Hillsboro, NH, and Concord, NH.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of two 
dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 
1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of 
recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and 
completed in September 1975. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of 
future recreational developmentin accordance with 1965 
Federal Water Project Recreation Act. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. A contract to 
replace electrical switchboards was awarded 9 February 
1994. Work began in June 1994 and was completed that 
month. Final contract amount was $30,900. A contract 
to clear and grub and install a drainage blanket was 
awarded 13 September 1994. Work began in December 
1994 and was completed in June 1995. Contractor 
earnings totalled $35,326 with final payment pending at 
fiscal year end. A contract to construct a compacted 
gravel fill base and install two culverts for an access road 
to Elm Brook Park was awarded 5 October 1994. Work 
began the following month and was completed in December 
1994. Final contract amount was $22,832. A contract 
for miscellaneous repairs at Blackwater Dam and 
Hopkinton - Everett Lakes was awarded 17 July 1995. 
Work had not begun at Hopkinton - Everett Lakes by 
fiscal year end. 
54E. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, 
LEOMINSTER, MA 
Location. The city of Leominster is located in north 
central Massachusetts, approximately 34 miles northwest 
of Boston. 
Existing project. Construction of stone slope revetment 
along 400 feet of eroding streambank adjacent to 
the Leominster Connector, an arterial roadway that 
links the interstate highway network with the city. This 
work was completed in 1994. (See Table 1-B at end of 
chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract 
for construction of emergency streambank protection 
measures alongthe North Nashua River was awarded 
20 September 1993. Work began in October 1993 and 
was completed in October 1994. Contract earnings 
totalled $131,927 with final payment pending at fiscal 
year end. 
54F. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, 
LEOMINSTER (SEWER LINE), MA 
Location. The City of Leominster is located in the 
northern portion of Worcester County in north central 
Massachusetts, approximately 34 miles northwest of 
Boston. The erosion site is along the North Nashua River 
in the vicinity of the Leominster Sewage Treatment 
Plant. 
Existing project. Provides for the construction of 
stone slope protection along 480 linear feet of eroding 
streambank and removal of accumulated snags and 
debris from the opposite riverbank. The project has an 
extimated total cost of $300,000 and will protect against 
continued erosion and possible collapse of an existing 36- 
inch reinforced concrete sewerline. (See Table 1-B at end 
of chapter for Act authorizing project.) 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
was signed on 1 December 1994 between the Corps and 
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The project sponsor 
must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal 
areas, and perform all relocations determined by the 
Government to be necessary for project construction; pay 
a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of total project 
costs during construction; pay an additional cash contribution 
during construction, so that the total contribution 
including lands equals 25 percent of total project costs; 
assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost 
1-25

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
limitation of $500,000; and bear all costs for maintenance 
of the project after completion. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract 
for construction of emergency streambank protection 
measures alongthe North Nashua River was awarded 
5 September 1995. Work had not begun by fiscal year 
end. 
55. NARRAGUAGUS RIVER, 
MILBRIDGE, ME 
Location. The town of Milbridge is located along the 
northeast coast of Maine approximately 50 miles southeast 
of Bangor, Maine. 
Existing project. Construction of stone slope protection 
along 100 feet of eroding streambank adjacent to 
U.S. Route 1A. This work was completed in 1993. (See 
Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing 
project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work. Final 
project costs were apportioned between the Federal and 
non-Federal accounts. 
56. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND 
ACUSHNET, MA 
Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford 
and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. 
Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark 
Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological 
survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford 
South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, MA and National 
Ocean Survey Charts 13230, 13070 and 13218.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of barrier 
and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962 and 
completed in January 1966. Construction of the pumping 
station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in 
June 1964. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operating 
costs included $32,145 for project operations; 
$34,438 for administration; $31,501 for utilities; $98,849 
for maintenance of building, grounds and utilities; and 
$21,161 for water quality control analysis. The cost of 
maintenance work accomplished by contract included 
$15,695 for miscellaneous facility repairs, and $16,385 
for manufacturing replacement wheels for the sector 
gate. 
57. POINT SHIRLEY, WINTHROP, MA 
Location. The town of Winthrop is a coastal community 
in Suffolk County, Massachusetts located along the 
northern shore of Boston Harbor. Grandview Avenue is 
a two-lane roadway which runs parallel to Boston Harbor. 
Existing project. Provides for the construction of 
approximately 800 linear feet of stone slope revetment 
along an eroding section of shoreline adjacent to 
Grandview Avenue. This work was completed in 1995. 
(See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing 
existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A 
contract for construction of emergency shoreline protection 
measures along Grandview Avenue was awarded 30 
September 1994. Work began in November 1994 and 
was completed in May 1995. Final contract amount was 
$542,332. 
58. QUONSET POINT, DAVISVILLE, RI 
Location. Quonset Point is located in east central 
Rhode Island along the west shore of Narragansett Bay 
in the village ofDavisville and Town of North Kingstown, 
about 15 miles south of Providence, Rhode Island. 
Existing project. Provides for the construction of 
two elevated water storage towers and the extension, 
rehabilitation and relocation of 6,000 feet of sewer line at 
an estimated total cost of $3,200,000. (See Table 1-B at 
end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not 
been requested yet. Local sponsors must provide 25 
percent of construction costs. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preparation 
of project plans and specifications continued. 
59. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA 
Location. The city of Revere is a coastal community 
located in Suffolk County about five miles northeast of 
the city of Boston, MA. Roughans Point is a low-lying, 
ocean front neighborhood of Revere. The area has 55 
acres and about 300 structures, mostly residential homes. 
Existing project. Project consists of 3,125 feet of 
stone revetment to dissipate incoming waves, prevent 
overtopping and stabilize existing facilities along the 
shoreline. The revetment would extend from a point 
about 250 feet south of Eliot Circle southerly to a point 
200 feet south of the intersection of Winthrop Parkway 
and Leverett Avenue. The project also calls for "backwater" 
protection by constructing an earth berm one foot 
high and 200 feet long on the existing median strip 
between Bennington Street and State Road and a sluice 
gate on the 42-inch drain from the Roughans area to 
Sales Creek. Interior drainage improvements consist of 
a new intake structure at the existing pump station and 
a new gravity drain with a sluice gate. (See Table 1-B at 
end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) 
1-26

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not 
been requested yet. Local interests must provide without 
cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-ofway, 
and relocations necessary for construction of the 
structural elements of the project, including ponding 
areas, borrow areas, and disposal areas for excavated 
material; hold and save the United States free from 
damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance 
of the project, not including damages due to the 
fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; 
bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacements; 
pay an amount in cash to bring the total non- 
Federal share to 35 percent of project costs allocated to 
storm damage reduction. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preparation 
of project plans and specifications continued. 
60. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, ME 
Location. The project is located in Aroostook county 
in northern Maine, and lies within the Saint John River 
Basin. 
Existing project. The project involves a research 
and demonstration program of cropland irrigation and 
soil conservation techniques for increasing potato yield 
and quality. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act 
authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
(LCA) for a two-year research and demonstration program 
was signed on 22 April 1991 between the Corps and 
the Maine Aroostook Water and Soil Management Board. 
The project sponsor must obtain all interests in real 
estate as determined by the Government and the project 
sponsor to be necessary for project implementation. The 
Government will reimburse the project sponsor 65 percent 
of project costs as work is accomplished, up to the 
Federal cost limit of $300,000. The LCA was amended on 
6 June 1994 to include a third year of research and 
demonstration at an estimated Federal cost of $252,000. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued 
research at the University of Maine's farm in Presque 
Isle, Maine. 
61. SAUGUS RIVER & TRIBUTARIES, 
MA 
Location. The commhnities of Revere, Saugus, 
Malden and Lynn are located along the Massachusetts 
coastline just north of Boston. 
Existing project. The proposed project involves the 
construction of a 1,300 foot long floodgate structure 
across the mouth of the Saugus River and construction of 
3.5 miles of dikes, walls, revetments, sand dunes and 
beaches along the Revere and Lynn shorefronts. Included 
with the proposed project is the acquisition, protection 
and management of 1,650 acres of salt water 
estuary along the Saugus and Pines Rivers for flood 
water storage. A mitigation site is planned at the 
abandoned I-95 embankment to replace 3 acres of clam 
flats and tidal habitat lost by project construction. (See 
Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing 
project.) 
Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not 
been requested yet. Consistent with the cost sharing and 
financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must 
provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations 
necessary for project construction; pay an amount 
in cash to bring the total non-Federal share of hurricane 
and storm damage reduction costs to 35 percent; pay 100 
percent of the separable costs allocated to recreation; and 
bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement 
of project facilities after construction. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: The 
project sponsor indicated by letter dated 31 August 1993 
that they intend to investigate a non-structural approach 
to flood protection as an alternative to the proposed 
project. Further efforts on the General Design 
Report were suspended pending the results of the 
sponsor's investigation. 
62. STAMFORD, CT 
Location. In Fairfield County on north shore of Long 
Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City, and 
20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, CT. (See Geological 
Survey map for Stamford, CT.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
see Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at 
end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) 
Project was completed in 1969. Local interests still owe 
a substantial amount based on claims settlements, including 
interest payment under the Contract Disputes 
Act. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for 
$662,000 outstanding which is local share of final claims 
settlement including interest payment. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. Acontract to 
construct a generator enclosure was awarded 22 November 
1994. Work began in March 1995 and was completed 
in June 1995. Final contract amount was $25,075. A 
contract to replace the navigation hoist system was 
awarded 11 April 1995. Contractor was working on the 
administrative phase of the contract at fiscal year end. 
63. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI, 
AND MA 
Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and 
reservoirs on tributaries ofThames River in Massachusetts 
and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles from 
Norwich, CT, and a channel enlargement on Shetucket 
River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. 
Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for 
a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in 
Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 
885, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and authorized $6 
million for initiation and partial accomplishment of 
1-27

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
project. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized 
completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of 
July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson 
Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 
41, 86th Congress, 2nd session. Local flood protection 
project for West River, New Haven, CT was authorized 
under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 
Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-Q at end of chapter on 
reservoirs and local protection projects, Thames River 
Basin, for projects comprising approved plan.) 
63A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA 
Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its 
junction with French River, and eight miles northeast of 
Southbridge, MA. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 
miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological 
Survey maps for Webster, MA and CT, and Leicester, 
MA.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 
and completed in June 1958. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. Public lands 
Appreciation Day was held 30 September 1995. 
Approximtely $40,000 of work was completed by 332 
volunteers. 
63B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA 
Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles 
above its confluence with Shetucket River, and one mile 
southwest of village of Fiskdale, MA. (See Geological 
Survey maps for Whales, MA and CT, Southbridge, MA 
and CT, East Brookfield, MA, and Warren, MA.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and 
completed in June 1960. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. 
63C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA 
Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its 
confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in 
town of Oxford, MA, about five miles north of Webster, 
MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA, and 
CT, Leicester, MA, Worcester South, MA, and Oxford, 
MA.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was 
completed in December 1959. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 
A contract for miscellaneous concrete repairs 
was awarded 1 February 1994. Work began in July 1994 
and was completed the following month. Final contract 
amount was $25,520. An evaluation report of measures 
to correct seepage problems at Hodges Village Dam was 
prepared including an Environmental Assessment and 
Finding of No Significant Impact. 
63D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT 
Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, CT, on 
Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with 
Willimantic River. It is four miles northeast of city of 
Willimantic, CT. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring 
Hill and Willimantic, CT.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, 
initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities. A contract 
to replace the electrical switchboard was awarded 27 
January 1995. Work began in March 1995 and was 
completed in July 1995. Contractor earnings totalled 
$36,422 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 
63E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT 
Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, in town of 
Thompson, CT. Site is in village of West Thompson, two 
miles upstream from city of Putnam, CT. (See Geological 
Survey map, for Putnam, CT.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, 
road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in 
August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial 
phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 
A contract to repair concrete was awarded 10 
May 1994. Work began in June 1994 and was completed 
in November 1994. Final contract amount was $46,538. 
A contract to repair the spillway bridge at West Thompson 
Lake and Maushpaug Road Bridge at Westville Lake 
was awarded 3 April 1995. Work began in May 1995 and 
1-28

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
was about 90 percent complete at fiscal year end. Contractor 
earnings totalled $77,073, of which $22,598 was 
for work at West Thompson Lake. 
63F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA 
Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles 
above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of 
Sturbridge and Southbridge, MA, and 1.3 miles west of 
center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps for 
Southbridge, MA and RI, and East Brookfield, MA.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report 
for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 
and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and 
completed in August 1962. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary 
operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 
A contract to repair Old South Street Bridge was 
awarded 28 January 1994. Work began in June 1994 and 
was completed in November 1994. Final contract amount 
was $193,780. A contract to repair the spillway bridge at 
West Thompson Lake and Maushpaug Road Bridge at 
Westville Lake was awarded 3 April 1995. Work began 
in May 1995 and was about 90 percent complete at fiscal 
year end. Contractor earnings totalled $77,073, of which 
$54,475 was for work at Westville Lake. 
64. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY AND 
BRAINTREE, MA 
Location. The project is located in the city of Quincy 
and the town of Braintree on the south side of Massachusetts 
Bay, along the eastern shore of Massachusetts, 
seven miles south of Boston in Norfolk County. The 
watershed is approximately 4.5 square miles. 
Existing project. Project provides for the construction 
of a 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined 
tunnel in bedrock approximately 140 to 180 feet below 
ground, intake and outlet structures, and improvements 
to the Town River downstream of the outlet shaft. The 
tunnel and its appurtenances will be supplemented by 
reconstruction of the Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, located 
at the headwaters of Town Brook. Reconstruction work 
includes a new spillway and outlet structure. The estimated 
total project cost (October 1995) is $36,000,000, 
and includes $6,100,000 in approved credit for compatible 
work that has been accomplished by the project 
sponsor. Total project costs do not include dam safety 
measures at Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, which are a non- 
Federal responsibility. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter 
for Act authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
(LCA) was signed on July 7, 1992 between the Corps and 
the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC). The MDC 
is required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, 
presently estimated at $830,000; reconstruct Old 
Quincy Dam to insure its structural integrity, presently 
estimated at $5,600,000; pay a cash contribution for the 
costs allocated to flood control, presently estimated at 
$2,070,000; so that the total contribution of local interests 
is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood 
control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and 
replacements, presently estimated at $42,000 annually. 
In addition, local interests must do the following: prescribe 
and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment 
on both the improvements and unimproved channels, 
and manage all project-related channels to preserve 
capacities for local drainage as well as for project functions. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing 
contract for construction of Town River improvements 
was awarded on 30 September 1992. Work began 
in December 1992 and was completed in December 1994. 
Final contract amount was $3,367,700. A second contract 
for construction of the tunnel was awarded 15 
September 1993. Work on this contract began in January 
1994 and was 66 percent complete at fiscal year end 
with contractor earnings of $11,799,909. 
65. WEST RIVER, NEW HAVEN, CT 
Location. New Haven, CT is located in southern New 
Haven County, about 35 miles south of Hartford, CT. The 
project area is located upstream of the intersection of 
Route 63 and West River in northwestern New Haven. 
Existing project. The West River was widened for 
1,150 feet from its existing 25- to 30-foot width to a 50- to 
70-foot width; a 1,150-foot modular wall was built along 
the right bank and a 600-foot cantilever sheet pile wall 
was built along the left bank. For Wintergreen Brook the 
channel has a 20- to 30-foot width, and a 550-foot sheet 
pile wall and 450-foot dike on the right bank. A recreational 
walkway on top of the modular wall with lighting 
and fencing to connect two existing city parks is also 
included. Project was completed in December 1992. (See 
Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing 
project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: State 
requested Corps to revise the flood insurance rate map 
for New Haven, Connecticut. 
66. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act 
of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works constructed 
with Federal funds are transferred to local 
interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance 
with regulations prescribedfor their operation and maintenance, 
regular inspections of the following projects 
were made during the fiscal year: 
CONNECTICUT: November 94 - East Hartford, 
Hartford; August 95 - New London; September 95 - 
Ansonia, Derby, New Haven, Pawcatuck, Stamford, 
Torrington. 
1-29

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
MAINE: October 94 - Ogunquit. 
MASSACHUSETTS: October 94 - Amesbury, 
Chicopee, Conway, Fitchburg, Gardner, Haverhill, 
Holyoke, Huntington, Lowell, Northhampton, Springfield, 
West Springfield; November 94 - Westfield; April 
95 - Fitchburg, West Springfield; May 95 - Charles River 
Dam, Chicopee, Gardner; September 95 - Blackstone, 
Millbury, Saxonville. 
NEW HAMPSHIRE: October 94 - Farmington, 
Nashua, Shelburne; September 95 - Keene. 
RHODE ISLAND: July 95 - Woonsocket; September 
95 - Burrillville. 
VERMONT: None. 
67. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR 
OPERATIONS 
A coordinated system of flood control dams, all of 
which have flood control as primary storage available 
with recreation and/or water supply as secondary storages 
in most of the projects, has been established in five 
major flood producing basins in New England. During 
periods of flood flows, regulation of reservoirs is fully 
coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location 
in the watershed, its available storage capacity and 
origin of the flood. In addition to flood control releases, 
water supply, flow augmentation and hydropower releases 
were made from selected reservoirs. Winter pools 
are maintained at many projects to submerge the flood 
control gates and keep them from freezing. 
During fiscal year 1995 there were no significant flood 
operations. 
CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN 
Regulation for canoe activities occurred at Ball Mountain 
and Townshend, Birch Hill, Tully, Littleville and 
Knightville - April 1995; Otter Brook - March 1995; 
Surry Mountain - May 1995. 
Non-flood releases from Colebrook Lake were made 
throughout fiscal year 1995 for hydropower generation, 
as required by the Hartford MDC, and during July, 
August and September for fisheries. 
Non-flood releases from North Hartland Lake were 
controlled by the Vermont Electric Generation and Transmission 
Cooperative for hydropower throughout fiscal 
year 1995. 
MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN 
Blackwater was regulated for canoe races in April 
1995. 
THAMES RIVER BASIN 
Regulation activities in the basin included releases for 
canoe races at Mansfield Hollow in June 1995, East 
Brimfield and Westville Lakes in April 1995. East 
Brimfield and Westville Lakes were also regulated for 
low flow augmentation during the drought of July, August 
and September 1995. 
68. HURRICANE BARRIER 
OPERATIONS 
Five hurricane barriers are situated along the southern 
coast of New England, protecting coastal communities 
from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes and 
severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational 
elements of the Stamford, CT and New Bedford- 
Fairhaven, MAbarriers. The Fox Point, RI, the Pawcatuck 
and New London, CT barriers are operated by the local 
communities. A brief resume of operations for the fiscal 
year follows: 
STAMFORD BARRIER. The barrier gates were 
operated on one occasion for a coastal storm duringfiscal 
year 1995. Total benefits associated with gate operation 
during fiscal year 1995 totalled $305,000. 
NEW BEDFORD BARRIER. During fiscal year 
1995, the New Bedford Barrier was operated on 17 
different occasions resulting in a total of $70,000 in 
benefits. 
FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER. The Fox 
Point Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal 
year 1995. 
PAWCATUCK HURRICANE BARRIER. The 
Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier was not operated during 
fiscal year 1995. 
NEW LONDON HURRICANE BARRIER. The New 
London Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal 
year 1995. 
69. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Table 1-E at end of chapter.) 
70. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205. Public 
Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization). 
(See Table 1-K at end of chapter.) 
Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 
208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. 
Fiscal year costs were as follows: 
(None) 
Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to 
Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. 
Fiscal year costs were as follows: 
Aroostook River, Caribou, ME 
Sebago Lake, Standish, ME 
$2,239 
67,868 
Project modifications for the improvement of the environment 
pursuant to Section 1135, PublicLaw 99-662, as 
amended (preauthorization). 
(See Table 1-L at end of chapter.) 
1-30

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
Emergency flood control activities--repair,f lood fighting, 
and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and 
antecedent legislation.) 
Federal costs for fiscal year were $235,645 for disaster 
preparedness. 
Deauthorized Projects 
71. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
(See Table 1-G at end of chapter.) 
General Investigations 
72. SURVEYS 
Costs for the fiscal year for surveys from regular funds 
were $930,730 of which $570,049 was for three flood 
damage prevention studies; $30,644 for two special studies; 
$410 for one comprehensive study; and $329,627 for 
coordination studies. 
73. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
BASIC DATA 
The Division Engineer is the U.S. member on the 
Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections 
are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and basic 
hydrologic information is compiled. A report of operations 
and development in the basin was prepared in 
cooperation with Canadian counterparts. Total costs for 
the fiscal year were $14,716. Total costs to 30 September 
1995 are $306,857. Concerns about fluctuating water 
levels on Spednik and East Grand Lakes and its adverse 
effects on fisheries and recreation were raised at two 
public meetings held by the International Joint Commission 
(IJC) in August 1992. These lakes are currently 
operated in conjunction with downstream hydropower 
facilities. The IJC has requested that the Saint Croix 
River Board of Control reexamine the Orders of Approval 
for Spednik and East Grand Lakes. A range of lake levels 
and minimum flow releases will be studied to assist the 
IJC in developing new operational procedures for these 
lakes which increase recreational opportunities, enhance 
the environment and improve water level and flow regulation. 
Total costs for fiscal year 1995 were $41,375. 
Total costs to 30 September 1995 are $60,244. 
The Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment 
was established in 1989 under an agreement 
signed by the Governors of Maine, New Hampshire and 
Massachusetts, and the Premiers of Nova Scotia and 
New Brunswick. The Council was tasked under this 
agreement to develop consistent policies, initiatives and 
programs designed to protect and conserve the shared 
natural resources of the Gulf ofMaine. In April 1993, the 
Council requested the New England Division Engineer 
to participate in this international program as an "observer" 
to the Council. In this capacity, the Division 
Engineer is expected to attend Council meetings and 
support their initiatives to the extent possible. In addition 
to the Division Engineer's direct participation, a 
representative of the Corps is a member of the Working 
Group to the Council, which implements directives of the 
Council. The Corps representative of the Working Group 
is assisting the Habitat Sub-Group to establish policies, 
set priorities and identify lead agencies for implementing 
habitat restoration projects in the Gulf of Maine. 
This effort includes investigating potential habitat restoration 
sites eligible for Corps participation under Section 
1135 and coordination of input from other Federal 
agencies. Total costs for the fiscal year were $12,744. 
Total costs to 30 September 1995 are $44,560. 
Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, 
upon responsible local request, of information on 
floods and potential flood damages, including identification 
of areas subject to inundation by floods of various 
magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for 
guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering 
advice to local interests for their use in planning to 
ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the fiscal year 
were $489,782. Total costs to 30 September 1995 are 
$8,424,613. 
The April 1987 flood was one of the largest of recent 
times in New England, resulting in spillway discharge at 
six Corps flood control reservoirs. A comprehensive 
hydrologic analysis of this flood event is needed to develop 
a base of information for use in future planning and 
design studies, as well as reservoir operation. Fiscal year 
1995 funds were used to continue hydrologic analysis of 
the 1987 flood within the Merrimack River Basin. Total 
costs for the fiscal year were $16,205. Total costs to 30 
September 1995 are $50,186. 
74. PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND 
DESIGN 
Total costs for Planning, Engineering and Design 
were adjusted $-1,492 for prior year local protection 
studies for Saugus River and Tributaries, Massachusetts. 
75. PRECONSTRUCTION 
ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
Preconstruction Engineering and Design costs were 
$75,881 for the navigation project at Boston, Massachusetts; 
$10,320 for the local protection project at Roughan, 
Point, Revere, Massachusetts; $35,635 for the local protection 
project at Saugus River and Tributaries, Massachusetts; 
and $764,487 for work on ten stormwater 
management projects. 
1-31

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
Andrews River, MA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
2. Aquatic Plant 
Control 
3. Aunt Lydia's Cove 
Chatham, MA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds - Other) 
4. Boston Harbor, MA 
5. Bullocks Point Cove, 
RI 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
6. Cape Cod Canal, 
MA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
7. Chatham (Stage) 
Harbor, MA 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Minor Rehab. 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Minor Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
14,500 105,338 
14,500 104,507 
1,000 
1,014 
1,000 
361 
11,004 
599,000 489,000 
635,889 511,306 
43,836 
43,253 
31,000 
31,003 
5,873 
5,956 
5,000 
1,293 
70,000 
86,342 
208,000 
243,079 
154,831 
137,570 
22,640 
22,640 
51,954 
52,248 
5,000 
1,968 
747,000 
644,727 
184,019 
51,826 
150,700 
103,006 
219,042 
219,042 
782,613 
782,149 
187,500 
187,500 
304,496 
297,004 
828,004 
731,069 
184,019 
51,826 
150,700 
103,006 
36,000 25,259,974 6 
75,881 25,254,170 5 
212,000 10,599,540 6 
220,898 10,590,508 6 
104,880 
104,785 
170,902 
170,902 
395,889 
395,794 
- 123,757 
- 123,757 
- 21,798,322 12 
- 21,798,322 1, 
5,078,637 7,229,031 
5,113,557 7,287,200 
5,981,000 5,958,000 136,093,114 
5,421,313 6,540,254 135,904,539 
- 115,432 
- 115,432 
- 390,677 
- 390,677 
- 26,609,000 
- 26,609,000 
266,705 * 
266,705 12 
17,441 159,351 -3,204 180,796 4,067,444 9 
1-32

TABLE 1-A (Continued) 
NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (continued)
Cost 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds) Contrib. 
Cost 
8. Connecticut River New Work 
below Hartford, Approp. 
CT Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds) Contrib. 
Cost 
9. Criehaven Harbor,ME New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
10. Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds) Contrib. 
Cost 
11. Duxbury Harbor, New Work 
MA Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds) Contrib. 
Cost 
12. Green Harbor, New Work 
MA Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds) Contrib. 
Cost 
13. Guilford Harbor, CT New Work 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
22,421 158,950 -3,720 182,188 4,067,392 s 
- 43,500 
- 43,500 
- 1,541,185 7,8 
- 1,541,185 7,8 
361,156 289,131 
601,116 474,304 
444,906 
444,154 
7,000 
6,436 
136,680 
136,679 
11,567 
11,567 
4,080 
3,890 
30,000 
30,000 
143,984 
141,963 
275 
275 
133,771 17,413,177 4 
135,283 17,412,976 4 
480,000 
420,606 
-11,900 1,350,811 10 
-11,218 1,349,281 10 
41,526 
40,488
- 35,000 13 
- 35,000 13 
- 237,512 
- 237,512 
174,938 388,400 
127,210 436,764 
78,995 278,782 
37,855 316,606 
261,427 
260,318 
356,630 
352,797 
193,000 3,717,864 
194,298 3,717,437 
- 158,341 
- 158,341 
- 137,222 
- 137,222 
-118,952 1,901,889 
-112,797 1,900,895 
- 25,500 
- 25,500 
1-33 
60,000 
60,000 
130,410 
130,410 
40,776 
40,776 
497,117 
437,159 
27,168 
27,168 
11,643 
11,643 
421,297 
421,297 
953,040 
952,002

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
14. Hampton Harbor, NH 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
15. Harbor of Refuge, 
Block Island, RI 
16. Josias River, ME 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
17. Little Harbor, NH 
18. New Haven Harbor, 
CT 
19. Plymouth Harbor, 
MA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
20. Point Judith Pond 
and Harbor of Refuge, 
RI 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
200,000 
200,000 
17,945 
17,945 
24,710 
24,710 
5,616 
5,616 
18,029 2,219,172 
14,981 2,216,124 
193,761 
193,761 
576,856 
576,856 
49,547 197,746 
49,547 197,491 
3,000 191,000 
27,007 26,420 
3,400 
3,400 
169,512 
6,315 
- 101,000 
- - 
12,960 
12,960 
214,877 
96,657 
18,566 
176,026 
66,067 
213,345 
83,177 
87,000 
86,513 
55,631 713,949 1,900,549 
55,931 251,242 2,362,385 
592,320 2,740,734 
709,858 2,739,568 
8,476 
-22,658 
68,400 
81,406 
12,386 
-1,906 
-1,866 
367,437 
325,115 
429,552 
426,639 
127,813 
122,376 
133,227 
133,227 
364,173 
363,726 
- 4,773,246 3 
- 4,773,246 3 
-17,161 16,950,750 
-16,553 16,950,463 
- 2,127,218 
- 2,127,218 
563 
563 
48,609 
48,609 
31,907 
31,907 
36,361 1,477,309 
35,696 1,476,644 
894,475 
894,475 
541,611 
541,611 
400 
400 
2,714,510" 
2,714,510" 
8,000 
8,000 
11,527 
11,330 
434,508 1,340,776 7,950,515 
33,693 1,740,913 7,949,310 
1-34

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI (continued) 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds) Contrib. 
Cost 
21. Provincetown Harbor, New Work 
MA Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds) Contrib. 
Cost 
22. Royal River, ME New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds- Other) 
23. Saco River, ME 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
24. Sakonnet Harbor, RI 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
25. Scarboro River, ME 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
- 1,926,000 
- 1,926,000 
- 17,587 
- 17,587 
- 33,000 
- 28,133 
185,000 3,766,954 
31,332 3,608,419 
- 1,053,966 
- 1,053,966 
- 760,000 
- 760,000 
156,341 
71,285 
336,704 
336,704 
926,449 
841,393 
- 49,562 
- 49,562 
- 18,000 
- 18,000 
- 20,000 
- 20,000 
- 1,064,983 
- 1,064,983 
975,562 115,905 
456,051 325,315 
13,448 
13,448 
1,620 
1,620 
-23,504 
286,188 
37,702 
37,276 
47,296 
47,296 
-89,765 2,850,571 
-89,442 2,850,378 
132,000 
132,271 
74,996 
74,996 
764,651 
746,651 
383,174 
383,019 
21,928 
21,928 
392,635 
392,635 
30,408 1,316,997 
29,562 1,316,151 
10,000 
10,000 
1-35

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
26. Scituate Harbor, MA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
27. Seekonk River, 
Providence, RI 
28. Sesuit Harbor, MA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
29. Stony Creek, 
Branford,CT 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
30. Wellfleet Harbor, MA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
31. Wood Island Harbor and 
the Pool at, Biddeford, ME 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
32. York Harbor, ME 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
- 379,851 
- 379,851 
22,696 
22,696 
8,460 
8,460 
3,802 
3,802 
503,558 
462,621 
697,749 
656,812 
- 69,976 
- 69,976 
50,000 
15,769 
215,785 
159,379 
-19,488 
36,912 
200,000 
24,981 
248,835 
246,426 
27,637 
250,000 
68,387 
- 226,306 
- 226,306 
23,452 763,661 
25,075 762,869 
- 124,588 
- 124,588 
- 112,487 
- 112,487 
14,946 
14,946 
19,539 
19,539 
13,261 
9,567 
452,828 
455,346 
814,197 
813,021 
- 85,176 
- 85,176 
- 157,634 
- 157,634 
8,347 
8,347 
262,700 
37,049 
5,400 
5,400 
28,400 
3,600 
3,600 
23,007 
23,007 
207,959 
286 
286 
3,600 
19,405 
19,616 
19,616 
37,657 
36,550 
-3,566 
40,861 
-176 
12,419 
29,501 
29,501 
854,690 1,859,413 
854,879 1,858,496 
-1,476 
-1,475 
14,100 
14,100 
-164 
-164 
106,838 
106,360 
32,000 
32,000 
428,056 
428,056 
581,295 
581,295 
43,660 
43,660 
239,654 
239,654 
510,645 
510,167 
32,161 
32,161 
1-36

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
37. Cliff Walk, Newport, RI 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
38. Prospect Beach, 
West Haven, CT 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
39. Sandy Point Outfall, 
West Haven, CT 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
40. Sea Bluff Beach, 
West Haven, CT 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
41. Southeast Lighthouse, 
Block Island, RI 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
42. Woodmont Beach, 
Milford, CT 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
47. Allendale Dam, North 
Providence, RI 
48A. West Hill Dam, 
MA 
49. Bluffs Community 
Center, Swansea, MA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
50. Charles River 
(Natural Valley 
Storage Areas), MA 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
750,000 
653,863 
72,466 1,410,000 
48,560 879,506 
- 1,170,000 
- 449,251 
-7,455 
2,915 
-31,467 
-1,337 
780,000 
48,784 
250,000 
20,277 
708,000 
210,000 
569,659 
415,688 
75,000 
41,726 
20,000 
15,434 
500,000 
1,049,602 
- 970,000 
- 842,35 
464,000 
296,069 
-150,000 
132,133 
187,249 
390,20 
127,650 
266,000 
646,102 
312,408 
- 1,155,491 
96,137 1,155,491 
- 955,237 
- 955,237 
- 85,176 
- 85,176 
-116,621 1,680,418 
78,120 1,680,418 
-321,468 1,089,351 
-16,407 1,089,351 
65,000 
45,276 
300,000 
130,000 
132,981 
81,550 
80,428 
140,000 
87,002 
300,000 
442,560 
440,975 
239,083 
237,961 
-8,000 1,649,249 
5,353 1,647,859 
- 970,000 
- 970,000 
-84,000 1,005,891 
-57,673 1,004,999 
-45,836 
67,623 
- 67,500 
- 5,779 
522,000 522,000 
533,639 564,064 
- 126,000 
3,944 21,348 
- 55,250 
506,000 
478,288 
4,000 
119,616 
1,500 
53,169 
623,843 4 
623,843 42 
67,500 
5,779 
2,306,902 14 
2,306,902 14 
456,000 7,113,698 
468,970 7,095,928 
-6,869 163,341 
-192 163,341 
-2,303 54,447 
1,278 54,447 
- 8,606,000 
- 8,606,000 
1-37

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
Charles River ( Natural Valley Storage Area) (continued) 
Maint. 
Approp. 205 
Cost 209 
51A. Ball Mountain New Work 
Lake, VT Approp. 36 
Cost 34 
Maint. 
Approp. 458 
Cost 468 
51B. Barre Falls Dam, New Work 
MA Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 438 
Cost 431 
51C. Birch Hill Dam, MA New Work 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
51D. Colebrook River 
Lake, CT 
51E. Conant Brook 
Dam, MA 
51F. Connecticut River, 
Middletown, CT 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds-Other) 
51G. Farmington River, 
Simsbury, CT 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
51H. Knightville Dam, 
MA 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
5,000 250,000 
x,982 138,040 
6,234 
4,114 
16,344 
17,142 
,000 535,000 
,128 556,289 
,000 408,000 
.,956 452,098 
216,000 
335,321 
-6,228 
1,226 
172,000 2,049,343 
157,182 2,029,919 
-453 11,107,842 15 
1,478 11,107,842 is 
571,000 1,241,000 10,201,723 
533,197 1,061,677 9,981,324 
325,000 
336,807 
- 1,967,819 
- 1,967,819 
608,000 7,535,060 
602,755 7,519,225 
4,815,679 e6 
4,815,679 16 
566,000 427,000 
658,696 485,348 
344,000 
336,229 
477,621 8,044,050 
414,558 7,962,114 
- 32,000 17 
- 32,000 1? 
- 14,263,971 
- 14,263,971 
321,000 290,000 
330,462 287,073 
76,000 172,000 
84,492 154,551 
10,000 162,000 
9,446 95,785 
113,000 -17,000 
20,831 
- 17,000 
- 10,700 
- 211,000 
2,079 25,162 
- 86,700 
580,000 494,000 
501,874 620,874 
583,000 
570,455 
86,000 
99,241 
65,175 
53,960 
1,522 
-129,000 
55,530 
16,311 
350,000 
320,558 
400,000 4,822,027 
422,268 4,808,343 
- 2,950,530 
- 2,950,530 
162,000 2,074,197 
158,252 2,060,743 
15,000 
2,995 
605 
252,000 
235,559 
96,000 
75,396 
22,000 
16,018 
297,524 499,524 
281,659 475,289 
133,200 219,900 
75,583 91,894 
- 3,415,640 is 
- 3,415,640 is 
513,000 9,140,446 
551,363 9,135,583 
1-38

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY98 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
511. Lancaster, Israel River, 
NH 
51J. Littleville Lake, 
MA 
51K. North Hartland 
Lake, VT 
51L. North Springfield 
Lake, VT 
51M. Otter Brook 
Lake, NH 
51N. Riverdale, West 
Springfield, MA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds-Other) 
510. Surry Mountain 
Lake, NH 
51P. Townshend Lake, 
VT 
51Q. Tully Lake, MA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
5,272 
5,568 
25,000 
4,297 
271,000 266,000 
242,654 319,216 
-25,000 
696 
550,000 
507,449 
-6,000 
142 
595,878 
595,288 
7,013,412 
7,013,412 
283,000 6,331,927 
318,901 6,324,916 
7,312,225 19 
7,312,225 '1 
470,000 381,000 
528,790 370,651 
680,500 
627,478 
477,000 7,567,043 
484,522 7,488,107 
6,831,526 20 
6,831,526 20 
589,000 402,000 
662,997 409,645 
627,700 
598,219 
498,000 11,717,149 
503,427 11,672,465 
4,360,448 21 
4,360,448 21 
435,000 484,000 
455,920 443,300 
25,000 
13,279 
30,000 
37,828 
441,000 
488,129 
300,000 
28,135 
202,172 
30,000 
702,000 7,780,297 
638,950 7,705,971 
300,000 1,933,000 
528,748 1,875,959 
4,828 
148,400 
10,000 
34,228 
232,000 
173,400 
40,000 
34,228 
2,833,610 23 
2,833,610 22 
383,000 371,000 
475,776 356,547 
603,766 272,332 
568,428 285,629 
415,000 583,000 
400,839 584,868 
460,000 447,000 
456,312 464,933 
507,000 
504,155 
-103,772 
20,420 
693,000 
699,486 
377,000 
365,809 
698,000 8,240,491 
624,876 8,138,864 
-7,547 8,540,545 " 
24,638 8,540,545 " 
1,226,000 9,883,418 
725,796 9,331,770 
- 1,666,752 24 
- 1,666,752 2 
675,000 7,537,725 
610,127 7,453,881 
- 40,000 17 
- 40,000 17 
1-39

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
51R. Union Village 
Dam, VT 
52A. Black Rock Lake, 
CT 
52B. Hancock Brook 
Lake, CT 
52C. Hop Brook Lake, 
CT 
52D. Mad River, Waterbury 
(Woodtick Area), CT 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
52E. Northfield Brook 
Lake, CT 
52F. Thomaston Dam, 
CT 
53. Machias River, 
Machiasport, ME 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
54A. Blackwater Dam, 
NH 
54B. Edward MacDowell 
Lake, NH 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
4,095,160 25 
4,095,160 25 
506,000 312,000 
545,910 417,716 
280,000 239,000 
346,003 231,062 
- - 
132,000 114,000 
136,332 106,116 
1,067,000 
1,874,473 
1,413 
922,000 
1,072,911 
25,000 
37,492 
405,000 
401,565 
361,000 
353,859 
147,000 
155,490 
804,500 
742,372 
15,000 
14,496 
497,000 7,177,393 
485,139 7,149,866 
- 8,182,300 
- 8,182,300 
374,000 4,587,581 
379,242 4,570,890 
- 4,178,911 
- 4,178,911 
151,000 2,163,934 
138,714 2,145,076 
- 6,151,562 26 
- 6,151,562 26 
725,000 12,422,825 
764,775 12,370,024 
99,918 336,896 
96,703 331,731 
362,000 362,000 
2,850,512 27 
2,850,512 27 
448,000 326,000 
466,801 297,155 
513,000 396,000 
519,966 410,791 
30,095 
6,035 
70,000 
37,964 
258,000 
324,999 
692,000 
477,382 
30,000 
84,740 
40,000 
37,415 
383,000 4,274,708 
346,178 4,230,509 
- 14,282,112 
- 14,282,112 
747,000 8,804,342 
845,979 8,668,063 
3,378 133,473 
4,734 133,473 
-7,267 32,733 41 
-4,682 32,733 41 
- 1,319,746 28 
- 1,319,746 28 
365,000 270,000 
372,960 244,158 
301,000 
298,715 
430,000 5,470,094 
399,252 5,404,510 
- 2,014,253 29 
- 2,014,253 29 
1-40

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
Edward MacDowell Lake, NH (continued) 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
54C. Franklin Falls New Work 
Dam, NH Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
54D. Hopkinton-Everett New Work 
Lakes, NH Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
54E. North Nashua River, New Work 
Leominster, MA Approp. 
Cost 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds) Contrib. 
Cost 
54F. North Nashua River, New Work 
Leominster (Sewer Line), Approp. 
MA Cost 
55. Narraguagus River, New Work 
Milbridge, ME Approp. 
Cost 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds) Contrib. 
Cost 
56. New Bedford, New Work 
Fairhaven, and Approp. 
Acushnet, MA Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds) Contrib. 
Cost 
57. Point Shirley, New Work 
Winthrop, MA Approp. 
Cost 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds) Contrib. 
Cost 
58. Quonset Point, New Work 
Davisville, RI Approp. 
Cost 
59. Roughans Point, New Work 
Revere, MA Approp. 
Cost 
60. Saint John River New Work 
Basin, ME Approp. 
Cost 
61. Saugus River & New Work 
Tributaries, MA Approp. 
Cost 
277,000 373,000 
292,138 386,074 
398,000 
386,929 
340,000 6,431,569 
337,895 7,415,817 
7,950,487 30 
7,950,487 30 
945,000 489,000 
834,456 532,581 
555,00 
492,569 
503,000 10,232,382 
624,132 10,205,280 
- 21,452,440 3 
- 21,452,440 3 
1,111,000 1,084,000 
1,243,716 1,132,816 
- 117,810 
17,937 15,377 
- 52,500 
- 60,558 
- 51,466 
30,073 
3,973 
50,000 
40,216 
949,000 1,089,000 14,673,570 
976,206 1,073,901 14,589,168 
83,379 
31,931 
4,707 
9,679 
10,000 
45,142 
- 29,000 
- 28,597 
16,167 
19,999 
50,000 
17,720 
2,966 
3,708 
-4,107 
-3,704 
157,999 
147,407 
52,500 
51,930 
115,265 
78,865 
93,039 
93,039 
24,893 " 
24,893 * 
11,510,088 
11,510,088 
240,400 211,000 
299,281 283,917 
230,000 
230,318 
278,000 6,011,821 
250,174 5,972,614 
- 6,513,763 32 
- 6,513,763 32 
10,246 80,000 
67,761 
- - 1,875,000 
- - 28,817 
230,000 69,000 25,000 
104,779 181,481 12,627 
- - 217,0000 
3,900 133,795 57,897 
1,389,000 1,488,000 
1,417,907 1,539,297 
-8,000 
335,741 
373,000 
395,485 
182,419 
182,419 
463,246 
463,246 
182,419 
182,419 
- 1,875,000 
194,419 223,236 
- 1,069,779 
10,320 1,053,737 
42,487 
-20,000 
34,143 
517,000 
293,674 
5,529,000 
5,511,950 
1-41

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY98 FY94 FY98 Sept. 30, 1995 
62. Stamford, CT 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds - Other) 
63A. Buffumville Lake, 
MA 
63B. 
63C. 
East Brimfield 
Lake, MA 
Hodges Village 
Dam, MA 
63D. Mansfield Hollow 
Lake, CT 
63E. West Thompson 
Lake, CT 
63F. Westville Lake, 
MA 
64. Town Brook, Quincy 
and Braintree, MA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds - Other) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
446,000 195,000 
497,172 278,240 
553,000 439,500 
521,885 462,474 
343,000 348,000 
435,671 345,135 
- - 
361,000 979,000 
387,547 927,418 
523,000 434,000 
399,276 552,499 
- - 
563,000 558,000 
546,909 603,299 
328,000 332,500 
359,577 319,290 
278,000 
264,297 
386,000 
397,143 
262,000 
264,514 
531,000 
583,711 
443,000 
421,805 
482,000 
431,671 
585,000 
525,875 
- 9,911,300 
- 9,900,640 
875,000 5,364,191 
391,055 4,845,695 
- 3,367,970 * 
- 3,367,453 " 
- 210,000 
- 209,969 
- 2,998,603 " 
- 2,998,603 " 
515,000 6,293,516 
486,733 6,249,146 
- 7,057,043 3 
- 7,057,043 36 
394,000 5,520,439 
389,489 5,507,299 
- 4,461,268 7 
- 4,461,268 7 
926,000 9,245,947 
896,772 9,203,497 
- 6,447,164 38 
- 6,447,164 " 
656,000 6,744,599 
669,408 6,703,323 
- 7,001,220 * 
- 7,001,220 * 
529,000 7,383,997 
523,223 7,339,156 
- 5,684,683 40 
- 5,684,683 40 
470,000 6,456,559 
457,249 6,365,032 
746,000 2,833,000 9,725,000 7,811,000 23,110,740 
198,271 2,543,540 5,015,819 9,036,625 18,770,003 
144,000 161,000 
- 150,916 
- 200,000 
- 172,886 
1,930,000 
264,947 
2,000,000 
- 2,235,000 
445,045 860,908 
1,535,000 3,735,000 
- 172,886 
1-42

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
65. West River, New New Work 
Haven, CT Approp. 1,900,000 185,000 -280,000 -3,500 3,886,500 
Cost 1,821,672 303,490 -210,686 12,590 3,886,440 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds) Contrib. - - - -60,000 762,000 
Cost 317,036 54,112 219,916 - 745,693 * 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds-Other) Contrib. - - - -20,000 74,400 
Cost 47,371 4,164 10,251 - 71,650 
1 Excludes $ 6,138,157 from Public Works Funds and 
$4,849,740 from Emergency Relief Funds. 
2 Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $511,089 
Code 713 funds. 
3 Includes $331,626 for previous projects, $290,877 
National Industrial Recovery Funds and $59,207 Public Works 
Funds.
" Includes $366,348 for previous projects. 
5 Includes $1,465,123 for previous projects. Excludes 
$935,303 Emergency Relief Funds and $1,030,806 Public Works 
Funds.
s Includes $17,879 for previous projects. Excludes $17,767 
Contributed Funds. 
7 Includes $287,374 for previous projects and excludes 
$9,000 for subproject "Eightmile River, CT." 
8 Excludes $60,000 expended for major rehabilitation. 
9 Includes $83,276 for maintenance of previous project. 
to Excludes $50,000 Contributed Funds expended for 
maintenance. 
11 Includes $12,000 for previous project. 
12 Includes $7,889 for previous project. 
13 Excludes $65,000 consisting of $13,000 for public wharf 
and $52,000 for additional construction. 
14 Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. 
15 Includes $504,062 Code 711 funds and $67,066 for fish 
passage facility. 
16 Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 
713 funds. 
17 Recreational cost sharing. 
18 Includes $199,303 Code 711 funds. 
1~ Includes $229,436 Code 711 funds. 
ao Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. 
21 Includes $364,688 Code 711 funds. 
" Includes $470,077 Code 711 funds. 
3 Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds and $1,117,494 for 
fish passage facility. 
24 Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 
713 funds. 
* Includes $88,931 Code 711 funds. 
* Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. 
2 Includes $20,000 Code 711 funds. 
2 Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. 
, Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. 
3� Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. 
a3I1n cludes $179,727 Code 711 funds. 
3 Cash for construction only. Excludes $146,020 
expended to date for land condemnation. 
3 Includes $12,000 for previous project. 
34 Cash for construction only. Excludes $199,410 
expended to date for land condemnations. 
* Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. 
3 Includes $207,700 Code 711 funds. 
37 Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,353 Code 
713 funds. 
38 Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. 
39 Includes $315,420 Code 711 funds. 
4o Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 
41 Excludes $11,758 for land costs. 
* Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of 
project.
3 Excludes $554,638 for land costs. 
"Excludes $6,120 for land costs. 
1-43

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
July 14, 1960 
as amended in 1965 
July 3, 1958 
October 23, 1962 
October 27, 1965 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
March 2, 1825 
June 14, 1880 
August 5, 1886 
September 19,1890 
July 25, 1892 
July 13, 1892 
June 3, 1896 
March 3, 1899 
June 13, 1902 
July 25, 1912 
August 8, 1917 
August 30, 19353 
Do. 
August 26, 1937 
October 17, 1940 
September 7, 1940 
July 24, 1946 
July 3, 1958 
October 23, 1962 
November 28, 1990 
ANDREWS RIVER,MA (See Section 1 of Text.) 
Channel six feet deep, 75 feet wide from deep water in 
Nantucket Sound to public marina; two jetties; 
three-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. 
AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text.) 
Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant 
growths from the waters and streams in the U.S. 
Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. 
Provided for continued research. 
AUNT LYDIA'S COVE, CHATHAM, MA (See Section 3 of Text) 
Entrance channel 100 feet wide by 900 feet long and 9.5 acre 
anchorage area, both 8 feet deep. 
BOSTON HARBOR, MA (See Section 4 of Text.) 
Preservation of islands and seawalls. 
Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep. 100 ft. wide 
to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. 
Fort Point Channel.4 
Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep. 150 ft. 
wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. 
Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) from mouth of 
Wier River to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket Beach 
12 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide. 
Channel 15 feet deep from Long Island to Nixes Mate 
Shoal (Nixes Mate to Nubble Channel). 
Channel 27 feet from Nantasket Roads to President Roads. 
Dredge Chelsea River channel to 18 feet. 
For 30-foot channel from sea to President Roads 
through Broad Sound by less direct route than 35 
and 40-foot channels. 
For 35-foot channel from sea to Boston Naval Shipyard. 
Chelsea and Charles River Bridges. 
Elimination from project of removal of Finns Ledge at 
outer entrance. 
Dredge Chelsea River channel 25 ft. 
Depth of 40 feet (45 feet in rock) in Broad Sound Channel. 
Present project dimensions of channel from President 
Roads to Commonwealth pier No. 1, East Boston and 
anchorage area north side of President Roads. 
Present project dimensions of that part of approach 
channel to U.S. Navy drydock No.3 at South Boston 
between Main Ship Channel and U.S. harbor line. 
Chelsea River, channel 30 feet deep. 
Reserved channel 30 feet deep. 
Abandons seaplane channel authorized in 1940 River 
and Harbor Act (H.Doc.262,76th Cong., 1st sess.) 
Extension of President Roads anchorage. 
Reserved channel 35 feet deep, 430 feet wide, extending one 
mile from 40-foot main channel to L Street. 
Chelsea River Channel and Maneuvering Basin 35 feet deep. 
Deepen Mystic River and Reserved Channels to 40 feet; 
Chelsea River Channel to 38 feet; widen and deepen Inner 
Confluence Area to 40 feet. 
P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized 
by Chief of Engineers, May 2, 
1966. 
H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 
Public Law 87-874, 87th Cong. 
H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong. 
P.L. 86-645, Section 107. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers, August 31, 1994. 
Annual Report, 1881, p. 518 
H. Ex.Doc. 206,48th Cong., 2nd 
sess., Annual Report, 1885, 
p. 543. 
Annual Report, 1890, p. 503 
Annual Report, 1893, p. 769 
Annual Report, 1887, p.517 
Annual Report, 1893, p. 766 
H. Ex. Doc. No. 162,53rd Cong., 3rd 
sess.,Annual Report, 1895, 
p. 648 
H. Doc. 133, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. 
Annual Report, 1898, p. 886. 
H. Doc. 119, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. 
Annual Report, 1901, p. 1096 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 
March 11, 1913. 
H. Doc. 272, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess.2 
H. Doc. 931, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess.2 
H. Doc. 244, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. 2 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 29, 74th Cong., 1st sess.2 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 24, 75th Cong., 1st sess.2 
H. Doc. 225, 76th Cong., 1st sess.2 
Public Law 420,78th Cong. 
H. Doc. 244, 80th Cog., 1st sess.2 
H. Doc. 349, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.2 
H. Doc. 350, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.2 
Section 101, Public Law 101-640. 
1-44

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Boston Harbor, MA 
October 31, 1992 
September 3, 1954 
January 21, 1927 
(Section 2) 
Included in Public 
Works Administration 
program, 
September 6, 1933 
June 26, 1934 
(Permanent 
Appropriations 
Repeal Act) 
Included in Public 
Works Administration 
program, 
April 29, 1935 
Included in 
Emergency Relief 
Program, May 28, 
1935. 
August 30, 1935 
March 2, 1945 
July 3, 1958 
March 2, 1945 
June 10, 1872 
March 3, 1881 
June 25, 1910 
February 27, 1911 
March 2, 1919 
August 30, 1935 
May 24, 1937 
March 2, 1945 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
(continued) 
Deauthorizes portion of the 35-foot channel in Boston 
Inner Harbor lying easterly of the Charlestown 
waterfront authorized in 1902 River and Harbor Act. 
BULLOCKS POINT COVE, RI (See Section 5 of Text.) 
Channel 8 feet deep, 6-foot turning basin, 6-foot anchorage, 
and breakwater. 
CAPE COD CANAL, MA (See Section 6 of Text.) 
Purchase canal from Boston, Cape Cod & New York 
Canal Co., in accordance with contract dated July 29, 1921, 
executed by that company. 
Construct three bridges and widen canal to 250 feet. 
Operation and care of works of improvement provided for the 
funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and 
harbors. 
Construct a mooring basin. 
Dredging and bank protection. 
Existing project for main canal adopted. 
15-foot channel and turning basin in Onset Bay. 
Extend East Boat Basin for an area of about 4.3 acres to a 
depth of eight feet. 
CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA 
(See Section 7 of Text.) 
Entrance channel ten feet deep, 150 feet wide from Chatham 
Roads into upper harbor. 
CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CT 
(See Section 8 of Text.) 
Jetties at mouth 
The Hartford dike 
Channel and turning basin in Eightmile River. 
Present project dimensions of channel over Saybrook Bar. 
Dikes, training walls, and revetments. 
Present project dimensions of channel and additional dikes, 
trailiing walls, revetments, and accessory works. 
Park River declared nonnavigable. 
Channel and anchorages, North Cove, Old Saybrook. 
Channel and anchorage in Essex Cove. 
Channel and anchorage in Wethersfield Cove. 
Section 116(2), P.L. 102-580 
H. Doc. 242, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 139, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 795, 71st. Cong., 3rd sess. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Rivers and Harbor Committee 
Doc. 15, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 431, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 168, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 456, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 
Annual Report 1942. 
Present project dimensions approved 
by Chief of Engineers, 
December 22, 1887. 
Present project dimensions 
authorized by Chief of Engineers 
in 1889. 
H. Doc. 327, 60th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 1294, 61st Cong.,3rd sess. 
H. Doc. 132, 65th Cong., 1st sess.' 
H. Doc. 49, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. 
Ltr. Sec. War, April 21, 1937. 
H. Doc. 368 76th Cong., 1st sess.' 
Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized 
by Chief of Engineers, 
October 18, 1961. 
Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized 
by Chief of Engineers, 
November 15, 1960. 
1-45

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Included in 
Emergency Relief 
Program, May 28, 
1935 & August 30, 
1935 
August 26, 1937 
March 2, 1945 
July 14, 1960, as 
amended 
March 2, 1945 
July 14, 1960, as 
amended in 1965 
July 11, 1870 
August 2, 1882 
August 5, 1886 
June 3, 1896 
March 2, 1945 
July 3, 1958 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
August 5, 1886 
CRIEHAVEN HARBOR, ME (See Section 9 of Text) 
Provides for a 300-foot rubblestone breakwater at 
Sunset Point. 
CUITYHUNK HARBOR, MA (See Sectionl0 of Text.) 
Channel 10 feet deep, 75 feet wide. 
Anchorage 10 feet deep, 900 feet long, 800 feet wide. 
Maintenance of existing jetties and stone dikes. 
DUXBURY HARBOR, MA (See Sectionll of Text.) 
Channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide along alinement 
of existing channel to Town Wharf from easterly 
channel; anchorage basin 8 feet deep of about 21 acres. 
GREEN HARBOR, MA (See Section 12 of Text.) 
Channel six feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water to head of 
navigation; anchorage near town pier; sealing, rebuilding in 
part and extension of existing west jetty. 
GUILFORD HARBOR, MA (See Section 13 of Text.) 
Entrance channel 100 feet wide, 6 feet deep; a channel 60 
feet wide, 6 feet deep; an anchorage basin 6 feet deep, 
200 feet wide. 
HAMPTON HARBOR, NH (See Sectionl4 of Text.) 
Extending north jetty 1,000 feet, raising outer 300 feet 
of south jetty and constructing 180-foot spur to high 
ground, channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide across 
entrance bar. 
HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI 
(See Section 15 of Text.) 
The main breakwater. 
Repairs to basin walls and cliff protection east of harbor. 
Breakwater enclosing inner harbor. 
Raising crest of main breakwater and making it sandtight. 
JOSIAS RIVER, ME (See Section 16 of Text.) 
Channel 5 feet deep, 40 feet wide from Perkins Cove to and 
including a 3.2 acre anchorage basin in Flat Pond. 
Extension of Flat Pond 5 foot anchorage area by 1 acre. 
Deepen existing 900 foot long Federal Channel and 2.1 acres 
of anchorage area to 7 feet. 
L ITLE HARBOR, NH (See Section 17 of Text) 
Provides for a channel 3,000 feet long, 100 feet wide and 
12 feet deep, anchorage basin of like depth 40 acres in 
area, and construction of two breakwaters at the harbor 
entrance. 
1-46 
Do. 
H. Doc. 81, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 
S. Doc. 115, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 
Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized 
by Chief of Engineers, 
December 15, 1965. 
H. Doc. 149, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 
P.L. 86-645, Section 107. 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers, 
February 18, 1964. 
Annual report 1868, p. 785 and 
S. Misc.Doc. 81, 40th Cong., 
2nd sess. 
S. Ex. Doc. 26, 47th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
S. Doc. 27, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. 
and Annual Report 1885, 
p. 610. 
H. Doc. 83, 54th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 227, 76th Cong., 1st 
sess. 4 
H. Doc. 377, 85th Cong., 2nd sess. 
Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized 
by Chief of Engineers, 
January 14, 1993. 
H. Doc. 91, 48th Cong., 2nd sess.

TABLE 1-B (Continued) 
NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
August 2,1882 
March 3, 1899 
July 25, 1912 
Do. 
July 3, 1930 
August 30, 1935 
March 2, 1945 
July 24, 1946 
August 16,1949 
August 9, 1955 
Novemberl7, 1986 
March 3, 1899 
March 4, 1913 
September 22, 1922 
October 23, 1962 
July 9, 1965 
September 16, 1890 
March 2, 1907 
June 25, 1910 
March 2, 1919 
June 30, 1948 
July 14, 1960, 
as amended 
June 25, 1910 
June 30, 1948 
July 14, 1960, as 
amended 
March 3, 1871 
River and Harbor 
Act 1882 
July 14, 1960, as 
amended in 1965 
NEW HAVEN HARBOR,CT (See Section 18 of Text.) 
Sandy Point dike. 
The 16-foot anchorage basin. 
Present project dimensions of channels in Mill River. 
Present project dimensions of West River channel and 
anchorage. 
18- and 16-foot channels in Quinnipiac River. 
25 foot channel. 
30-foot channel and anchorage and present location of 
16-foot anchorage. 
35-foot main channel, elimination of 30-foot anchorage, 
present location and extent of 16-foot anchorage. 
Brewery Street channel declared non-navigable. 
Abandonment of upper end of West River. 
Deepening existing channel to 40 feet, widening to 500 feet, 
realigning bends and providing a common turning basin 
at the head of the harbor. 
PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA (See Sectionl2 of Text.) 
Beach protection. 
Dredging 18-foot channel. 
Dredging 15-foot extension, inluding turning basin. 
Rubblestone breakwater. Anchorages are eight feet deep 
inside breakwater. Elimination of authorized 18-foot 
anchorage from existing project. 
Recreational development. 
POINT JUDITH POND AND HARBOR OF REFUGE, 
POINT JUDITH, RI (See Section 20 of Text.) 
The main breakwater. 
Present dimensions of eastern shore arm. 
Western shore arm. 
Removing three shoals from the harbor arm. 
Abandons project for entrance to Point Judith Ponds, and 
authorizes channels and anchorages in lower pond and 
upper pond. 
Extension of existing 15-foot channel. 
PROVINCETOWN HARBOR, MA (See Section 21 of Text.) 
Rubblestone protection dike across House Point Island Flats 
from Stevens Point to Wood End and extension of Long 
Point beach protection. 
Offshore breakwater about 2,500 feet long. 
Channel 13 feet deep by 250 feet wide extending about 
2,000 feet from deep water just outside the west end of 
the stone breakwater to MacMillan Wharf. 
ROYAL RIVER, ME (See Section 22 of Text.) 
Enlargement of channel through bar at Gravel Point and 
removal of several ledges near Yarmouth. 
Construction of 195-foot rubblestone jetty and dredging 
channel. 
8-foot channel, 80 feet wide and anchorage. 
Plans approved by a board of 
Engineers, October 2, 1882. 
H. Doc. 82, 55th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 26, 62nd Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 535,62nd Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 686, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 479, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess.2 
H. Doc. 307, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 517, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. 
H.R. 3511, 81st Cong., 1st sess., 
P.L. 234. 
Section 202, P.L. 99-662. 
Annual Report for 1899, p. 1089. 
H. Doc. 1194, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. 
H. Doc. 996, 66th Cong., 3rd sess. 
H. Doc. 124, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 66, 51st Cong., sess. 
H. Doc. 60, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 911, 60th Cong. 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 2001, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. 
S. Doc. 15, 80th Cong., 1st sess. 
P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized 
by Chief of Engineers, 
September 29, 1976. 
H. Doc. 821, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 600, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. 
Section 107, P.L. 86-645. 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers, 
July 28, 1995. 
Section 107, P.L. 86-645. 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers, 
April 27, 1965. 
1-47

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
March 2, 1827 
June 23, 1866 
September 19, 1890 
June 25, 1910 
March 3, 1925 
August 30, 1935 
July 14, 1960, 
as amended 
July 4, 1836 
March 3, 1899 
March 2, 1907 
September 4, 1954 
July 14, 1960, as 
amended 
May 17, 1950 
August 26, 1937 
June 30, 1938 
September3, 1954 
November 17, 1986 
December 18, 1991 
Intermodal Surface 
Transportation 
Infrastructure 
Act of 1991. 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
SACO RIVER, ME (See Section 23 of Text.) 
Extension of piers, placing bouys, and removal of obstruction 
at entrance to harbor. 
Breakwater on north side of mouth of river. 
Jetty on north side or mouth of river. 
Channel improvements and jetty extension on south side of 
mouth of river. 
Present project channel dimensions and extensions of north 
breakwater about 1,600 feet. 
Extension of north breakwater to Sharps Ledge. 
Anchorage and maneuvering basin. 
SAKONNET HARBOR, RI (See Section 24 of Text) 
Breakwater 
Prolonging old breakwater and raising it to 8 feet above 
mean low water, to width of 15 feet. 
Rock removal near breakwater. 
Breakwater extension and harbor dredging. 
A 500-foot rubble-mound breakwater and a 110-foot 
wide by 100-foot deep navigation channel. 
SCARBORO RIVER, ME (See Section 25 of Text.) 
Channel across bar 200 feet wide, 8 feet deep; channel 
2,400 feet long, 6 feet deep, leading to an anchorage; 
and jetty 800 feet long. 
SCITUATE HARBOR, MA (See Section 26 of Text.) 
Present project dimensions of channels and anchorage 
basin and maintenance of the north and south jetties 
to lengths of 720 and 450 feet respectively. 
Extension of existing north jetty 300 feet in an 
easterly direction together with its maintenance. 
A channel 10 feet deep, 200 feet wide, from existing 
12 foot entrance channel to the town wharf and then 
150 feet wide to an anchorage 10 feet deep, 400 by 900 feet, 
in the inner harbor and an anchorage 8 feet deep, 400 by 
1500 feet in extension on the northwesterly side of 
existing 10 foot anchorage. 
SEEKONK RIVER, PROVIDENCE, RI (See Section 27 of Text.) 
Removal of abandoned India Point Railroad Bridge. 
Extends project authorization. 
SESUIT HARBOR, MA (See Section 28 of Text.) 
Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. 
S. Ex. Doc. 44, 48th Cong., 1st sess. 
and Annual Report 1884, p. 482 
H. Doc. 752, 61st Cong., 2nd sess.' 
H. Doc. 477, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 11, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 1 
Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized 
by Chief of Engineers, November 
14, 1967. 
H. Doc. 154, 20th Cong., 1 sess. 
H. Doc. 81, 55th Cong., 1st sess. 
and Annual Report 1897, p. 934. 
H. Doc. 99, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. 
and Annual Report 1901, p. 1148. 
H. Doc. 436, 82nd Cong., 2nd sess. 
Section 107, P.L. 86-645. 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers, 
June 25, 1981. 
Chief of Engineers, March 8, 
1960, H. Doc. 69, 81st 
Cong., 1st sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Com. 
Doc. 26, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 556, 75th Cong. 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 241, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. 
Section 1166(c), P.L. 99-662. 
Section 1085, P.L. 102-240. 
Section 107, P.L. 86-645 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers, 
February 6, 1980. 
1-48

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-B (Continued) 
Acts 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Work Authorized 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
March 2, 1945 
May 17, 1950 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
March 3, 1905 
July 14, 1960 
October 27, 1965 
October 31, 1992 
September 3, 1954 
October 23, 1962 
October 23, 1962 
October 23, 1962 
November 28, 1990 
October 31, 1992 
STONY CREEK, BRANFORD, CT (See Section 29 of Text.) 
6-foot entrance channel, 100 feet wide and maneuvering 
basin. 
WELLFLEET HARBOR, MA (See Section 30 of Text.) 
Channel 10 feet deep, 125 feet wide and anchorage basin. 
WOOD ISLAND HARBOR and POOL at BIDDEFORD, 
ME (See Section 31 of Text.) 
Dredged basin 6 feet deep and construction of three ice 
breakers. 
Channel 4,200 feet long, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep. 
YORK HARBOR, ME (See Section 32 of Text.) 
Channel off Bragdons Island 170 feet wide, 10 feet deep. 
Removing to the same depth projecting shoal just 
above the island. 
Anchorages 8 feet deep north and south of 
Bragdons Island. 
CLIFF WALK, NEWPORT, RI (See Section 37 of Text) 
Improvements for shore protection along the Cliff Walk. 
Revised cost-sharing requirements. 
PROSPECT BEACH, WEST HAVEN, CT 
(See Section 38 of Text.) 
Widening to 100-foot width by direct placement of sand 
approximately 6,000 feet of shore from about 350 feet 
south of South Street northerly to Ivy Street, and construction 
of 8 impermeable groins each 330 feet long. 
Widening by direct placement of sand along 4,300 feet of shore 
front between Ivy Street and the groin structure south of 
Tyler Avenue and periodic beach nourishment as required 
over the 50-year economic life of the project. 
SANDY POINT OUTFALL, WEST HAVEN, CT 
(See Section 39 of Text.) 
Construction of 1,000 feet of concrete block revetment. 
SEA BLUFF BEACH, WEST HAVEN, CT 
(See Section 40 of Text.) 
Beach widening along approximately 1,000 feet of shorefront; 
50:feet wide beach berm; reconstruction of existing rock 
groin structure and a beach monitoring program. 
SOUTHEAST LIGHTHOUSE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI 
(See Section 41 of Text.) 
Relocate the lighthouse approximately 200 feet north of its 
present location. 
Revised cost-sharing requirements. 
Section 107, P.L. 86-645. 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers 
December 4, 1967. 
Annual Report 1895, H. Doc. 557, 
76th Cong., 3rd sess. 
H. Doc. 49, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 
Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized 
by Chief of Engineers, October 
18, 1990. 
H. Doc. 301, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Ex. Doc. 243, 48th Cong., 
2nd sess. 2 
H. Doc. 395, 86th Cong., 
2nd sess.2 
H. Doc. 228, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 
Section 102 (z), P.L. 102-580. 
H. Doc. 203, 83rd Cong., 
1st sess. 
Section 103, P.L. 87-874. 
Authorized by the Chief of 
Engineers, September 12, 1992 
Section 103, P.L. 87-874. 
Authorized by the Chief of 
Engineers, January 17, 1995 
Section 103, P.L. 87-874. 
Authorized by the Chief of 
Engineers, December 14,1989 
Section 416, P.L. 101-640. 
Section 357, P.L. 102-580 
1-49 
Documents

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
September 3, 1954 
October 23, 1962 
October 31, 1992 
July 24, 1946, 
as amended 
March 7, 1974 
July 24, 1946 
as amended 
July 24, 1946, 
as amended 
June 30, 1948, 
as amended 
August 18, 1941 
June 30, 1948, 
as amended 
June 30, 1948, 
as amended 
WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT 
(See Section 42 of Text.) 
Widening to 100-foot width by direct placement of sand, 
500 feet of shore west of Merwin Point; widening 
3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street; and 
construction of 5 impermeable groins. 
Placement of suitable sandfill along approximately 1,500 feet 
of beach and reconstruction of groins. Mitigation to replace 
rocky habitat for Blue Mussels. 
ALLENDALE DAM, NORTH PROVIDENCE, RI 
(See Section 47 of Text.) 
Reconstruct dam. 
BLUFFS COMMUNITY CENTER, SWANSEA, MA 
(See Section 49 of Text.) 
Construct 300 linear feet or rock revetment along the seaward 
side of the Bluffs Community Center. 
CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE 
AREAS), MA (See Section 50 of Text.) 
Federal acquisition and perpetual protection of 17 crucial 
natural valley storage areas totalling 8,422 acres in what 
is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the 
Charles River. 
CONNECTICUT RIVER, MIDDLETOWN, CT 
(See Section 51F of Text.) 
Bank protection of 500 linear feet with 6-inch concrete 
paving block and riprap toe protection. 
FARMINGTON RIVER, SIMSBURY, CT 
(See Section 51G of Text.) 
Bank protection by clearing and grubbing existing slope and 
refilling eroded areas with compacted granular fill. 
LANCASTER, ISRAEL RIVER, NH (See Section 51I of Text.) 
Construction of a gabion overflow weir for local flood 
protection. 
RIVERDALE, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA 
(See Section 51N of Text.) 
Approximately 12,700 feet of earth levee, two pumping 
stations and three stop-log storage structures. 
Construct improvements to existing pumping station 
and gravity outflow channel. 
MAD RIVER, WATERBURY (WOODTICK AREA), CT 
(See Section 52D of Text.) 
Widen and deepen channel along two restricted areas of the 
Mad River totaling 1,450 linear feet. 
H. Doc. 203, 83rd Cong., 
1st sess. 
Section 103, P.L. 87-874. 
Authorized by the 
Chief of Engineers, 
March 30, 1992. 
Section 358, P.L. 102-580. 
Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized 
by the Chief of Engineers, 
February 26,1993. 
Chief of Engineers report dated 
December 6, 1972. 
Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized 
by the Chief of Engineers, 
December 17, 1991. 
Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized 
by Chief of Engineers, 
September 27, 1988. 
Section 205, P.L. 80-858. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers May 11, 1978. 
H. Doc. 724, 76th Cong., 
3rd sess. 
Section 205, P.L. 80-858. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers, June 13, 1986. 
Section 205,P.L. 80-858. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers, December 21,1992. 
1-50

TABLE 1-B (Continued) 
NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
July 24, 1946, 
as amended 
July 24, 1946, 
as amended 
July 24, 1946, 
as amended 
July 24, 1946, 
as amended 
July 3, 1958 
July 24, 1946, 
as amended 
October 31, 1992 
November 17, 1986 
Novemberl7, 1986 
October 31, 1992 
July 14, 1960 
MACHIAS RIVER, MACHIASPORT, ME 
(See section 53 of Text.) 
Construct 380 linear feet of stone slope protection adjacent 
to State Highway Route 92. 
NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LEOMINSTER, MA 
(See Section 54E of Text.) 
Construct 400 linear feet of stone slope protection adjacent to 
the Leominster Connector. 
NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LEOMINSTER (SEWER LINE), MA 
(See Section 54F of Text.) 
Construct 480 linear feet of stone slope revetment adjacent to 
an existing 36-inch sewer line. 
NARRAGUAGUS RIVER, MILLBRIDGE, ME 
(See Section 55 of Text.) 
Construct 100 linear feet of stone slope protection adjacent 
to U.S. Route 1A. 
NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET, 
MA (See Section 56 of Text.) 
Hurricane barriers in New Bedford Harbor. 
POINT SHIRLEY, WINTHROP, MA 
(See Section 57 of Text.) 
Construct 800 linear feet of stone slope revetment along 
the shoreline of Boston Harbor adjacent to Grandview Avenue. 
QUONSET POINT, DAVISVILLE, RI (See Section 58 of Text.) 
Construction of two elevated water storage towers and 
extension, rehabilitation and relocation of 6,000 feet of 
sewer line. 
ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA (See Section 59 of Text.) 
Stabilize existing facilities along the shore with a 4,080-foot 
long armor stone revetment. Construct earth berm one-foot high 
and 200 feet long on existing median strip between Bennington 
Street and State Road. 
SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, ME (See Section 60 of Text.) 
Ten-year research and demonstration program of cropland 
irrigation and soil conservation techniques for increasing 
potato yield and quality. 
SAUGUS RIVER & TRIBUTARIES, MA 
(See Section 61 of Text.) 
Construct tidal floodgates across the mouth of the Saugus River 
and 18,400 linear feet of dikes, walls, revetments and dune 
restoration along the shorefront of Lynn and Revere. 
STAMFORD, CT (See Section 62 of Text.) 
Hurricane barrier protecting areas of Stamford from 
tidal damage. 
Section 14, P.L. 79-526. 
Authorized by the Chief of 
Engineers, April 8, 1993. 
Section 14, P.L. 79-526. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers, April 8, 1993. 
Section 14, P.L. 79-526. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers September 12, 
1994. 
Section 14, P.L. 79-526. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers, March 9, 1993. 
S. Doc, 59, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 
Section 14, P.L. 79-526. 
Authorized by the Chief of 
Engineers, May 4, 1994. 
Section 362, P.L. 102-580. 
Section 401, P.L. 99-662. 
Section 1108, P.L. 99-662. 
Section 101, P.L. 102-580. 
Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated August 1, 
1990. 
H. Doc. 210, 86th Cong., 1st 
seS. 
1-51

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
TOWN BROOK, QUINCY & BRAINTREE, MA 
(See Section 64 of Text.) 
November 17, 1986 Construct 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined H. Doc. 39, 99th Cong., 1st 
tunnel in bedrock approximately 190 feet below ground. sess. 
WEST RIVER, WEST HAVEN, CT (See Section 65 of Text.) 
June 30, 1948, Widen river for 1,150 feet to 50-70 feet. Widen the Wintergreen Section 205, P.L. 80-858. 
as amended Brook channel to 20-30 feet. Construct recreational walkway Authorized by the Chief of 
connecting two existing city parks. Engineers, September 26, 
1988. 
1 Contains latest maps. 
2 Contains latest published maps. See also Annual Report, 1911, p. 1178 
(seawalls and Nixes Mate Channel) and Annual Report, 1903, p. 770 
(Fort Point Channel.) 
3Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 
4A portion has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 624, December 31, 1970. 
1-52

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full 
Report Contributed 
See Annual Operation and Funds Expended 
Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) 
Apponaug Cove, RI' 
Bagaduce River, ME 1,3,4, 
Bar Harbor, ME' 
Bass Harbor, MEo6' 
Bass Harbor Bar, ME' 
Beals Harbor, ME' 
Belfast Harbor, ME' 
Bellamy River, NH 1,3,4 
Beverly Harbor, MA' 
Black Rock Harbor, CT' 
Boothbay Harbor, ME' 
Branford Harbor, CT' 
Bridgeport Harbor, CTI 
Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI 8 
Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME' 6 
Bucksport Harbor, ME' 
Bunker Harbor, ME",6 
Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA'1 6 
Camden Harbor, ME' 
Canapitsit Channel, MA1,4 
Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME' 
Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME 1 
Cathance River, ME1,3 
Clinton Harbor, CT' 
Coasters Island Harbor, RI14, 
Cobscook Bay, ME1,3,4 
Cocheco River, NH1,3 ,4 
Cohasset Harbor, MA' 
Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME",6 
Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, MA' 
Damariscotta River, ME1,4 
Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME1,4 
Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA' 
Duck Island Harbor, CT' 
East Boothbay Harbor, ME' 
Edgartown Harbor, MA' 
Essex River, MA' 
Exeter River, NH1,4 
Fall River Harbor, MA5 
Falmouth Harbor, MA' 
Fivemile River Harbor, CT ,5 
Frenchboro Harbor, ME' 
Georges River, ME' 
Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, 
MA' 
Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI"5 
Greenwich Bay, RI' 
Greenwich Harbor, CT' 
Harraseeket River, ME 1,4 
Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's 
Island, NY' 
Hendrick's Harbor, ME' 
Hingham Harbor, MA' 
Housatonic River, CT 
Hyannis Harbor, MA' 
Ipswich River, MA 1 
Island End River, Chelsea, MA",6 
1964 
1912 
1932 
1965 
1920 
1959 
1971 
1897 
1951 
1988 
1953 
1990 
1983 
1987 
1976 
1907 
1969 
1985 
1960 
1899 
1977 
1964 
1884 
1985 
1911 
1866 
1913 
1979 
1984 
1954 
1906 
1916 
1968 
1953 
1953 
1978 
1948 
1913 
1984 
1978 
1969 
1978 
1978 
1983 
1989 
1893 
1969 
1896 
1931 
1957 
1954 
1983 
1992 
1969 
1983 
156,874 2 
28,000 
406,591 
188,859 
4,076 
184,880 
61,561 32 
34,643 
246,048 
18,000 
9,537 
4,491,119 * 
316,288 
277,420 
18,421 
95,372 
163,855 
102,400 
9,113 
175,037 
147,438 
21,000 
191,406 
5,500 
4,173 
119,089 
267,737 38 
795,253 
24,200 
5,000 
40,000 
94,584 
482,166 
6,500 
65,614 35 
21,759 
62,454 9 
6,164,757 40 
123,763 
35,490 
657,345 
25,788 
1,296,934 36 
189,037 
2,000 
198,758 
30,963 
$8,401 
28,204 
28,316 
859,691 
484,137 
5,618 
311,850 
42,189 
39 
2,187 
37,272 
20,382 
132,289 
262,112 
28,427 
1,642,493 
33,668 
1,925,607 
2,121,710 50 
27,537 
20,833 
32,906 
235,138 46 
162,293 
12,279 
361,364 
27,827 
1,065,410 
13,161 
60,839 
433,325 
96,629 
54,328 
905 
5,792 
362,224 
411,954 
17,238 
62,980 
119,878 14 
3,032 
2,080,567 34 
333,649 
234,469 
24,616 
266,621 
1,646,442 
591,948 
6,527 
204,872 
5,309 
$ 38,462 
6,325 
166,800 
2,548,262 
936,853 " 
32,947 
100,000 
147,887 
69,323 
20,000 
111,289 
10,000 
35,000 
35,000 
25,000 
100,000 
222,010 
103,363 
192,336 4 
1-53

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full 
Report Contributed 
See Annual Operation and Funds Expended 
Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) 
Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME 1 
Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH' 
Jonesport Harbor, ME ' 
Kennebec River, ME 1 
Kennebunk River, ME 1 
Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA , 
Lamprey River, NH",4 
Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA1,4 
Lubec Channel, ME' 
Lynn Harbor, MA' 
Machias River, ME' 
Malden River, MA'"� 
Matinicus Harbor, ME1 
Medomak River, ME' 
Menemsha Creek, MA' 
Merrimack River, MA1 
Mianus River, CT' 
Milford Harbor, CT 122 
Moosabec Bar, ME' 
Mystic River, CT 1 
Mystic River, MA1 
Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA' 
Narragansett Town Beach, RI2 
Narraguagus River, ME 1 
New Bedford and Fairhaven 
Harbors, MA1 
New Harbor, ME 122 
New Haven Breakwater, CT 1 
New London Harbor, CT ' 
Newburyport Harbor, MA' 
Newport Harbor, RI ' 
Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT " 6 
Northeast Harbor, ME 1 
Norwalk Harbor, CT 1 
Owl's Head Harbor, ME 13,22 
Patchogue River, CT 1,22 
Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett 
Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI & CT' 
Pawtuxet Cove, RI' 
Penobscot River, ME 1 
Pepperell Cove, ME 1 
Pig Island Gut, ME ,e 6 
Pleasant River, ME 1 
Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket 
Sound, MA 1 
Portland Harbor, ME' 
Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, 
ME & NH 
Potowomut River, RI' 
Providence River and Harbor, RI' 
Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, MA6'8 
Richmond Harbor, ME",4 
Richmond's Island Harbor, ME,'4 
Rockland Harbor, ME' 
Rockport Harbor, MEaS 
Rockport and Old Harbors, 
Rockport, MA ' 
1980 
1977 
1992 
1992 
1985 
1976 
1913 
1906 
1956 
1956 
1972 
1922 
1962 
1953 
1981 
1940 
1985 
1989 
1930 
1957 
1986 
1989 
1969 
1953 
1966 
1950 
1986 
1994 
1953 
1972 
1954 
1983 
1968 
1984 
1978 
1975 
1985 
1969 
1966 
1892 
1956 
1985 
1993 
1882 
1990 
1972 
1883 
1882 
1976 
1989 
1986 
137,653 
80,691 
7,489,073 
1,599,940 '1 
350,334 
99,098 
19,980 
18,000 
380,322 
755,576 
32,000 
104,853 
14,000 21 
17,000 
56,926 
369,891 
132,435 
90,506 31 
11,400 
197,582 
3,222,777 
502,661 41 
27,398 
821,144 
1,857,618 
118,620 24 
1,242,246 
638,774 '17 
565,224 12 
733,524 
66,464 
138,942 
531,129 " 
124,158 
351,181 
318,787 28 
295,356 
501,020 
171,351 
191,753 
3,500 
1,083,504 
9,588,710 27 
18,360,800 26 
5,000 
$ 25,417,022 * 
38,764 
20,000 
119,844 
1,948,462 
32,000 " 
22,000 
1-54 
180,786 
651,644 
3,928 
4,002,723 
1,284,842 
37,386 
33,563 
19,673 
23,941 
250,814 
229,812 
45,097 
8,989 
92,359 
722,379 
720,350 
659,390 
1,355,190 29 
25,227 
143,385 
2,013,155 
746,700 
109,816 
736,827 
28,611 
40,273 
1,903,056 
5,964,092 
146,478 
117,844 
51,047 
3,850,912 42 
13,867 
771,407 
727,665 
217,495 
978,947 
50,276 
86,456 
217 
846,590 
8,110,716 
2,278,552 
50 
4,862,509 " 
1,808 
478,111 
260,516 
263,826 
832,119 
80,990 
62,000 
12,500 
46,500 
11,380 30 
14,000 
20,385 
7,015 
65,139 
34,500 
4,383 
156,694 
20,000 
295,356 
4,437,665

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full 
Report Contributed 
See Annual Operation and Funds Expended 
Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) 
Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove, 
Rockport, MA 16. 
Rye Harbor,NH' 
St. Croix River, ME1 
Sakonnet River, RI�'o 
Salem Harbor, MA' 
Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), 
Cape Ann, MA'8 
Sasanoa River, ME1,' .4 
Searsport Harbor, ME' 
Seekonk River,RI' 
South Bristol Harbor, ME 
Southport Harbor, CT1 
Southwest Harbor, ME1 
Stamford Harbor, CT' 
Stockton Harbor, ME'1, ,4 
Stonington Harbor, CT' 
Stonington Harbor, ME",6 
Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME' 
Taunton River, MA1 
Tenants Harbor, ME1 
Thames River, CT' 
Union River, ME3,15 
Vineyard Haven, MA' 
Wareham Harbor, MA' 
Warren River, RI' 
Warwick Cove, RI ,6 
Wells Harbor, ME 1 
Westcott Cove, CT' 
Westport Harbor and 
Saugatuck River, CT I 
Weymouth Back River, MA' 
Weymouth-Fore & Town 
Rivs., MA22 
Wickford Harbor, RI22 
Wilson Point Harbor, CT"~, 
Winnipesaukee Lake, NH' 
Winter Harbor, ME"6 
Winthrop Harbor, MA' 
Woods Hole Channel, MA' 
1989 
1991 
1950 
1909 
1969 
1922 
1915 
1966 
1954 
1971 
1962 
1962 
1980 
1915 
1959 
1985 
1914 
1948 
1920 
1967 
1912 
1943 
1896 
1890 
1975 
1991 
1978 
1972 
1944 
1979 and 1983 
1973 
1895 
1952 
1976 
1895 
1940 
1,786,754 
130,342 
179,550 
38,427 
1,693,202 
1,925,553 
35,000 
572,568 16 
672,214 
89,593 
59,213 ' 
180,042 
892,824 37 
33,000 
377,328 
898,500 
19,871 
442,895 
18,750 
1,471,919 
146,855 
27,186 
95,997 
5,000 
155,430 
360,973 
55,960 
19,308 
48,740 
30,194,613 a 
233,410 
54,177 
7,500 
162,937 
8,992 
230,000 
1-55 
12,531 
707,592 
63,092 
13,578 
631,811 
16,060 
124 
77,770 
868,674 
43,923 
388,649 
66,540 
1,789,609 a 
23,216 
157,273 
16,558 
32,917 
20,854 
1,653,580 
168,425 
17,926 
42,891 
91,340 
1,928,768 
347,248 
182,224 
27,353 
1,651,998 " 
163,144 
29,870 
22,538 
38,515 
55,614 
51,430 
61,338 ' 
19,892 
67,792 
2,567 
18,285 
7,501 
169,636 
133,985 * 
212,0000 " 
21,000 
20,000 
630,133 
49,094 23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
1 Completed. 
2 Excludes costs of $137,583 for local cooperation 
requirements, which includes $104,583 cash contribution. 
3 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th 
Congress, 1st session. 
4 No commerce reported. 
s Completed except for inactive portion. 
6 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 
86-645, Sec. 107). 
7 Excludes $37,714 Emergency Relief Funds. 
8 Inactive. 
9 Includes $53,254 for previous projects. 
10 Commerce included under Tiverton Harbor, RI. 
11 Excludes $129,757 expended for rehabilitation and 
breakwaters repaired in 1961. 
12 Excludes $1,415,524 for major rehabilitation. 
13 Recommendation for abandonment of existing project 
made in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. 
14 Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds expended. 
15 Improvement adequate for commerce. 
1' Costs to local interests for berth improvements are 
estimated to be $60,000. 
17 Includes $40,800 for previous project. 
18 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64th 
Congress, 1st session, and in River and Harbor Committee 
Doc. 3, 65th Congress, 1st session. 
19 Includes $509,411 for previous projects. 
20 Under State maintenance. 
21 Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; 
breakwater repaired in 1962. 
22 Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers 
(Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). 
23 Excludes $10,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 
24 All assurances of local cooperation have not been 
fulfilled. Public landing at Back Cove has not been 
constructed. 
25 Lack of local sponsor. (Project authorized by Section 
361 of WRDA 1992.) 
26 Includes $130,390 for previous projects. 
27 Includes $692,435 for previous projects. 
" Includes $133,357 for previous project. 
* Includes $3,160 for previous project. 
30 Excludes 173,425 Contributed Funds, Other. 
31 Includes $42,340 for previous project. 
32 Includes $22,000 for previous project. 
33Excludes $10,000 Contributed funds, Other. 
34 Includes $81,410 for previous project. 
35 Includes $15,614 for new work for previous projects. 
3 Includes $21,000 for previous projects. 
37 Includes $135,143 for previous project. 
38 Includes $10,000 for previous project. 
39 Includes $162,517 for previous project. 
40 Includes $330,204 for previous project. 
41 Includes $45,835 for new work for previous project; 
excludes $211,649 expended for minor rehabilitation; jetty 
repaired in 1963. 
42 Includes $66,120 for previous projects. 
43 Includes for previous projects $735,900 (Weymouth, 
Fore R.) and $25,000(Town R.). 
44 Includes for previous project $5,250 (Weymouth, Fore 
River) and $12,577 (Weymouth, Town River). 
45 Includes $59,420 for previous project. 
4 Includes $35,214 for previous project. 
47 Excludes $81,548 Contributed Funds, Other. 
48 Excludes $582,188 Contributed Funds, Other expended. 
49 Includes $378,450 for previous project. 
50 Includes $11,949 for maintenance of previous project. 
51 Excludes $37,200 Contributed Funds, Other. 
52 Includes $3,761,412 for previous projects. 
53 Excludes $650,136 for previous projects. 
54 Includes $15,000 expended for previous project. 
55 Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 
1-56

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Cost to Amount 
See Annual Sep. 80, 1995 Expended by 
Project Report For Construction Local Interest 
Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT' 1958 $ 5,810 $ 11,612 
Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT 1 1964 56,386 120,179 
Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA ',5 1982 228,081 228,080 
Compo Beach, Westport, CT 1 1962 84,544 169,089 
Cove Island, Stamford, CT' 1961 47,131 94,262 
Cummings Park, Stamford, CT 1 1963 26,886 53,771 
Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), 
Guilford, CT 1961 15,620 31,241 
Gulf Beach, Milford, CT ' 1958 21,303 42,606 
Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT 1 1956 163,183 326,366 
Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH 1 1966 260,868 385,641 
Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT' 1956 14,401 28,802 
Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT ' 1961 3,930 7,859 
Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA 4 1986 50,000 
Middle Beach, CT' 1958 8,810 17,620 
Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI 2 1963 14,512 29,024 
North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA 1 1969 106,552 106,552 
Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA 15 1976 273,334 198,583 
Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI 1 1982 559,200 181,175 
Plum Island, MA ",5 1977 118,882 104,875 
Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MA' 1962 621,464 1,242,880 
Revere Beach, MA 1 1994 3,889,016 2,197,312 
Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, ME 1 1993 233,260 
Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI 1 1959 40,143 82,000 
Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT 1 1961 23,759 47,518 
Seaside Park, CT' 1958 150,000 329,921 
Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT 1,6 1983 1,186,830 889,330 
Short Beach, CT 3 1956 
Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT' 1964 62,560 270,695 
Southport Beach, CT' 1960 17,631 35,263 
Town Beach, Plymouth, MA' 1964 5,490 10,981 
Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH' 1966 65,131 435,942 
Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA 1971 180,944 200,208 
Winthrop Beach, MA 1960 176,567 353,134 
'Completed. 
2 Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874. 
3 Project completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from Federal navigation improvement at 
Housatonic River. (See page 88 of the 1956 Annual Report.) 
4Inactive. 
5 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 
* Portion authorized by Chief of Engineers. 
1-57

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Cost to September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Contributed 
Project Report for Construction Funds 
Alford, Green River, MA 3',410 
Alley Bay, Beals, ME3'4 ,10 
Amesbury, Powwow River, MA3 ,4 
Ansonia - Derby, CT3 
Bagaduce River, ME 3s4.10 
Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 3'4 
Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 3,4,10 
Bound Brook, Scituate, MA 3,4 
Canton, MA 3.4 
Charles River Dam, MA 3 
Charlestown, NH 3,4,10 
Cherryfield, ME3 ,4 
Chicopee, MA 3 
Chicopee Falls, MA3 
Clear River, Burrillville, RI 3,4.10 
Cocheco River, NH 3.4 
Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH 3.4,10 
Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH 3a.410 
Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA 3s 4.10 
Danbury, CT 3 
Derby, CT 3 
East Branch Dam, CT 3 
East Hartford, CT 3 
Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) 
Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 34 
Fort Kent, ME 3,4 
Fox Point Barrier, RI3 
Gardner, MA 3'4 
Gulf Street, Milford, CT 3 ,4 10 
Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT 3 
Hartford, CT3 
Hartford, White River, VT 3'4 
Haverhill, MA 3 
Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA3'4 
Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME 3a4.10 
Holyoke, MA 3 
Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA 3"4 
Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT 3.4,10 
Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA 3.4,10 
Huntington, MA 3,4,10 
Island Avenue, Quincy, MA '4 
Islesboro (The Narrows), ME 3,4,10 
Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME 3,4,10 
Keene, NH 3,4 
Lee, Housatonic River, MA 3.4.10 
Little River, Belfast,ME 3a4.10 
Lowell, MA 3 
Lower Woonsocket, RI 3 
Machias River, Machias, ME3 ,4,10 
Mad River Lake, CT 3 
Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME a'4.o 
Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME 3,4o'0 
Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 3a4"01o 
Nashua, NH 3 
New London, CT 
Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT3"' 04. 
1977 
1979 
1978 
1977 
1985 
1989 
1986 
1974 
1964 
1981 
1976 
1963 
1954 
1978 
1987 
1963 
1982 
1976 
1988 
1978 
1977 
1973 
1951 
1979 
1979 
1976 
1970 
1991 
1970 
1960 
1973 
1940 
1979 
1980 
1953 
1985 
1982 
1981 
1960 
1983 
1985 
1985 
1955 
1976 
1990 
1945 
1977 
1987 
1973 
1987 
1980 
1988 
1950 
1992 
1985 
$ 41,419 
190,500 
132,113 
18,266,040 
129,500 
2,591,000 
249,999 
47,300 
156,568 5 
41,170,921 
113,330 
191,095 
1,433,600 
2,183,912 
168,000 
183,100 
180,000 
54,703 
250,000 
13,143,000 
7,582,642 
1,959,836 
2,135,447 13 
220,284 
1,997,820 
11,112,801 
495,691 
365,000 
2,572,357 
6,094,100 * 
332,236 
1,743,485 
2,325,470 
207,390 
3,418,000 25 
739,003 
102,800 
202,608 
3,900 
172,000 
165,500 
163,082 
44,146 
37,852 
166,682 
490,600 11 
6,600,681 
152,000 
4,773,020 
243,000 
107,682 
110,000 
270,000 8 
8,504,919 28 
222,500 
$ 
21 
4,576 
92,981 
5,554,088 15 
385 
411,292 2 
180,000 
19 
7,637 
3,616,290 14 
15,000 
21,000 
2,781,100 
120,000 
24,447 
43,000 
1,266,638 20 
327 
2,015,709 2 
1-58

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Cost to September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Contributed 
Project Report for Construction Funds 
Northampton, MA 3 
North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT3a4 
North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA3 
North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA 3,4"10 
Norwalk, CT3 ,4 
Norwich, CT 3 
Park River, Hartford, CT 3 
Pawcatuck, CT 3 
Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI*3'4 
Penobscot River, Old Town, ME 3,4 
Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME 3,4,10 
Phillips Lake, MA' 
Pleasant Point, Perry, ME 3,4 10 
Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT 3,4"10 
Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME 3,4,10 
Salmon River, Colchester, CT3'4 
Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME 3,4.10 
Saxonville, MA 3 
Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME 3 4 
Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH 3,4 10 
Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA 34 
South River, Conway, MA 34"10 
Springdale, MA3 
Springfield, MA 3 
Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT 3'4 
Stony Brook, Wilton, NH 3'4 
Sucker Brook Dam, CT3 
Three Rivers, MA 3 
Torrington, East Branch, CT 3.4 
Torrington, West Branch, CT 3'4 
Town River Bay, Quincy, MA 3 ,4.o 
Trumbull Lake, CT 1 
Village of Saxtons, VT 3,4,10 
Ware, MA 3'4 
Waterbury-Watertown, CT 3'4 
Weston, VT3,4 
West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA3,4 
West Springfield, MA 326 
West Warren, MA3,4 
Winsted, CT 3 
Woonsocket, RI 3 
Worcester Diversion, MA 3 
1950 
1977 
1981 
1979 
1952 
1960 
1986 
1966 
1986 
1986 
1994 
1982 
1987 
1986 
1980 
1983 
1984 
1980 
1985 
1977 
1978 
1987 
1952 
1950 
1983 
1973 
1976 
1970 
1963 
1963 
1983 
1983 
1985 
1963 
1963 
1957 
1983 
1992 
1964 
1954 
1962 
1978 
680,000 '7 
73,865 
3,235,000 23 
81,671 
52,150 
1,209,000 
58,876,919 
644,311 
3,174,260 
178,045 
70,990 
300,000 
189,000 
227,500 
73,674 
247,100 
127,500 
4,218,700 
1,857,475 
37,657 
1,803,738 
133,500 
700,000 
577,000 18 
116,296 
19,500 
2,227,792 
1,577,189 
389,237 
228,237 
55,228 
1,498,800 
140,500 
400,000 
265,300 
13,079 
119,433 
1,798,728 27 
389,176 
245,500 
4,033,100 
5,086,896 
1 Inactive. 
2 Excludes $1,146,828 expended from Contributed Funds, 
Other. 
3 Completed. 
4 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 
s Reflects FY1967 settlement of outstanding claims in the 
amount of $13,295. 
6 Excludes $8,503 Contributed Funds, Other. 
7 Includes $295,000 Public Works Administration funds. 
8 Excludes $147,366 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency 
funds expended. 
9 Excludes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. 
10 Emergency Bank Protection. 
11 Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. 
" Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. 
18 Includes $380,000 Public Works Administration Funds. 
14 Cash for construction only. Excludes $245,000 expended 
for land condemnation. 
15 Excludes $1,674,567 Contributed Funds, Other. 
16 Excludes $259,408 Contributed Funds, Other. 
17 Excludes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 
18 Excludes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 
1 Excludes $406,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 
a0 Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. 
21 Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. 
* Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and 
1-59 
16 
214,106 
20,554 24 
6 
5,350 
58,800
- 12 
18,409 
14,343 
41,000 
224,476 
70,161

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
$25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. 
SExcludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration funds 
expended on Fitchburg, MA. 
24 Excludes $3,109 for lands. 
25 Includes $610,000 Public Works Administration funds. 
26 Portion Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 
TABLE 1-F 
"Excludes $245,000 Public Works Administration Funds. 
2 8 Excludes $852,127 non project cost per 1976 WRDA. 
"Excludes $1,629,256 for lands and $303,251 Contributed 
Funds, Other. 
OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS 
INCLUDING POWER 
Cost to September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Contributed 
Project Report for Construction Funds 
Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME ' 1935 $ 6,384,394 
1 Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. 
1-60 
TABLE 1-E (Continued)

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
Funds Expended 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Date Contributed 
Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds 
Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir - Aug 1977 $ - $ - 
Andover Lake, CT - Aug 1977 - - 
Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) - Oct 1978 - 
Baker Brook, MA 1972 Nov 1979 94,000 - 
Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) 1932 Nov 1986 - - 
Beards Brook Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 78,000 - 
Beaver Brook Lake, NH 1973 Apr 1978 378,300 
Bennington Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 205,000 - 
Big River Reservoir, RI 1987 Nov 1990 - - 
Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - 
Boothbay Harbor, ME (Portion of 1912 Act) - Oct 1992 - - 
Boston Harbor, MA (1945 Act) 1984 Jan 1990 - - 
Boston Harbor, MA (portion of 1902 Act) 1995 Oct 1992 - - 
Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - - 
Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1980 Nov 1979 
Brockway Lake, VT 1946 Aug 1977 - - 
Cambridgeport Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - 
Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) 1954 Aug 1977 - - 
Claremont Lake, NH 1968 Dec 1970 242,700 - 
Clyde, RI 1948 Apr 1951 8,800 - 
Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT 1932 Jan 1990 132,146 - 
Connecticut River below Hartford 
CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1978 - - 
Cotuit Harbor, MA 1962 Oct 1978 8,541 - 
Dickey - Lincoln School Lakes, ME 1984 Nov 1986 26,285,298 - 
Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA 
(uncompleted portion) 1968 Jan 1990 - - 
Eastport Harbor, ME 1984 Nov 1983 638,675 141,530 
Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1978 Nov 1986 - - 
Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1930 Act) 1984 Nov 1986 - 
Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1969 Oct 1978 - - 
Gaysville Lake, VT 1970 Oct 1976 206,600 - 
Gorton's Pond, Warwick, RI - Nov 1991 - 
Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI 
(uncompleted portion) 1983 Nov 1986 - - 
Greenwich Harbor, CT (portion of 1919 Act) - Nov 1990 - - 
Greenwich Point Beach, CT 1959 Oct 1978 - - 
Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI 
(uncompleted portion) 1983 Nov 1986 - 
Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - - 
Honey Hill Lake, NH 1949 Aug 1977 92,000 
Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1986 - 
Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - 
Ludlow Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - 
Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1956 Nov 1986 - - 
Manchester Harbor, MA 1949 Nov 1979 23,986 - 
Marblehead Harbor, MA 1968 Oct 1978 43,711 - 
Mattapoisett Harbor, MA 1950 Oct 1978 - - 
Merrimack River, MA - Nov 1991 - 
Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1981 Nov 1986 - - 
Monoosnoc Brook, MA 1967 Nov 1986 - - 
Monoosnoc Lake, MA 1967 Nov 1986 
Mountain Brook Dam, NH 1949 Aug 1977 57,000 
Mystic, CT 1968 Aug 1972 67,700 - 
Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - 
Nantasket Beach, MA 1971 Jan 1990 - - 
1-61

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
Funds Expended 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Date Contributed 
Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds 
Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA 
(uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1965 Nov 1986 
Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA 
(inactive portion) 1989 Jan 1990 - - 
Napatree Beach, RI - Nov 1979 - - 
Narragansett Pier, RI 1966 Nov 1970 115,590 - 
Neponset River, Milton Town Landing to 
Port Norfolk, MA Nov 1991 
New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA 
(uncompleted portion) 1953 Nov 1986 - - 
Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - 
New Haven Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - 
Newburyport, MA (Portion of 1910 Act) - Oct 1992 - - 
Nookagee Lake, MA 1976 Nov 1986 563,677 - 
North Andover and Lawrence, MA 1949 Aug 1977 20,000 - 
North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH 1963 Nov 1981 - - 
Norwalk-Wilton, CT 1973 Nov 1979 - - 
Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI 
and CT (uncompleted portion) 1978 Nov 1986 - - 
Pawcatuck River, RI & CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - - 
Pawtucket, RI 1949 Nov 1977 - - 
Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1981 - - 
Pleasant Bay, MA 1971 Nov 1986 - - 
Point Judith, RI 1968 Nov 1977 198,477 - 
Pontiac Diversion, RI 1948 Apr 1951 24,200 - 
Providence River and Harbor, RI 
(uncompleted portion) 1976 Nov 1986 - - 
Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA 1961 Oct 1978 - - 
Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1978 - - 
Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) 1976 Nov 1986 - - 
Saco River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1979 - - 
Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1982 Jun 1982 176,000 - 
Salem Harbor, MA (inactive portion) 1969 Jul 1995 - - 
Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1969 Nov 1986 - - 
1945 Act) 
Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) 1922 Oct 1978 - - 
Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT (uncompleted portion) 1964 Nov 1986 - - 
South Coventry Lake, CT 1951 Aug 1977 96,000 - 
South Tunbridge Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - 
Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects 
uncompleted portions) 1979 Oct 1978 - - 
Stamford Harbor, CT (inactive portion) 1979 Jan 1990 - - 
Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1959 Nov 1986 - 
Stonington Harbor, ME (1960 Act) 1961 Nov 1979 2,543 - 
Stratford, CT 1973 Mar 1977 934,500 - 
Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH 1946 Dec 1944 - - 
Taunton River, MA (inactive portion) 1948 Jan 1990 - - 
Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1967 Nov 1986 - - 
The Island Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - 
Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - - 
Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (inactive portion) 1964 Jan 1990 - - 
Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA 1961 Nov 1986 - 
Wareham Harbor, MA (inactive portion) 1896 Jan 1990 
Wareham-Marion, MA 1965 Aug 1977 81,715 - 
Victory Lake, VT 1967 Aug 1977 168,400 - 
West Brookfield Reservoir, MA 1948 Jul 1960 67,000 - 
1-62

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
Funds Expended 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Date Contributed 
Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds 
West Canaan Lake, NH 1948 Aug 1977 92,000 - 
Westerly, RI 1966 Nov 1986 -- 
Westfield, MA 1967 Sep 1969 507,200 - 
Westport, CT 1965 Feb 1970 29,634 
Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT 
(uncompleted portion) 1972 Nov 1979 - 
Westport River, MA 1942 Jan 1990 - - 
Whitmanville Lake, MA 1979 Jul 1995 605,023 
Williamsville Reservoir, VT 1949 Dec 1944 146,500 
Winthrop Beach, MA(uncompleted portion) 1960 Nov 1986 - 
1-63

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-H NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, 
PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) 
Fiscal Year Contributed Funds 
Study Identification Costs Expended 
Gloucester Harbor, Gloucester, MA $ 13,056 
Gloucester Harbor, Ship Channel, Gloucester, MA . 73,516 
Hyannis Harbor, Hyannis, MA 53,587 $88,000 
Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA 12,668 
Seekonk River, Pawtucket, RI 44,176 
TABLE 1-I BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, 
PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) 
Fiscal Year Contributed Funds 
Study Identification Costs Expended 
Beach Point, Truro, MA $ 4,604 
Black Rock Beach, Nahant, MA 68,925 
Greenwich Cove, Greenwich, CT 2,230 
Humarock Beach, Scituate, MA 2,937 
Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI 151 
Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA 55,585 $40,400 
North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA 84,568 $79,300 
Point Beach, Milford, CT 202,753 
Rexhame Dunes, Marshfield, MA 399 
Siasconset Beach, Nantucket, MA 6 
Silver to Cedar Beach, Milford, CT 15,046 
Victoria Beach, East Haven, CT 5,239 
Wells and Drakes Island, Wells, ME 34,607 
West Silver Beach, CT 32,419 
Winthrop Shore Drive, Winthrop, MA 860 
TABLE 14J MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES PURSUANT TO SECTION 111 
PUBLIC LAW 90-483 (PREAUTHORIZATION) 
Fiscal Year Contributed Funds 
Study Identification Costs Expended 
Camp Ellis Beach, Saco, ME $23,423 
1-64

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-K FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, 
PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) 
Fiscal Year Contributed Funds 
Study Identification Costs Expended 
Point Beach, Milford, CT $ 2,476 
Ten Mile River, Cheshire, CT 1,954 
Shetucket River, Sprague, CT 70,272 
TABLE 1-L PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE 
ENVIRONMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 1135, 
PUBLIC LAW 99-662, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) 
Fiscal Year Contributed Funds 
Study Identification Costs Expended 
Galilee Salt Marsh, RI $ 66,531 
Initial Appraisals & Coordination Account 14,990 
Sagamore Marsh, Cape Cod Canal, MA 226,448 
TABLE 1-M BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI 
(See Section 39 of Text) 
RESERVOIR 
Miles Estimated Federal Cost 
Above 
Mouth of 
Black- Reservoir Lands 
stone Height Capacity and 
Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages Total 
West Hill2 Worcester,MA 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,366,922 $940,000 $2,306,902 
' Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 
2 See individual report for details. 
1-65

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-M (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 
Miles Estimated Cost 
Above 
Mouth of 
Black- Lands 
stone and 
Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total 
Worcester, MA 48 Diversion tunnel and channel $4,923,500 $1,179,000 2 $6,102,500 
Woonsocket, RI 15 Channel improvement 3,733,100 1,069,000 s 4,802,100 
Lower Woonsocket, Flood wall, conduits and 
RI 13 channel improvement 8,356,239 435,000 8,791,239 
Blackstone River, 
Millbury, MA 32 Slope protection 256,619 - 256,619 5 
Clear River, 
Burrillville, RI 23 Retaining wall 168,000 - 168,000 
Pawtuxet River, 
Warwick, RI - Land acquisition 4,125,000 - 4,125,000 ' 
1 Includes relocation. : $3,300,000 Federal; $825,000 non-Federal. 
2 $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. $ $250,000 Federal; $6,619 non-Federal. 
3 $300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. 
TABLE 1-N CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT 
(See Section 42 of Text) 
DAMS AND RESERVOIRS 
Miles Estimated Federal Cost 
Above 
Mouth of 
Connec- Reservoir Lands 
ticut Height Capacity Constr- and 
Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages' Total 
Vermont: 
Union Village 2 
North Hartland 2 
North Springfield 2 
Ball Mountain 2 
Townshend 2 
New Hampshire: 
Surry Mountain 2: 
Otter Brook 2 
Massachusetts: 
Birch Hill 2 
Tully 2 
Barre Falls 2 
Knightville 2 
Littleville 2 
Conant Brook 2 
Connecticut: 
Colebrook River 2 
Mad River 
Sucker Brook 
White River Jet. 
White River Jct. 
Springfield 
Brattleboro 
Brattleboro 
Keene 
Keene 
228.4 170 Earthfill 
211.7 185 Earthfill 
191.3 120 : Earthfill 
178,2 . 265 Rockfillearth 
168.3 133 Earthfilld 
38,000 
71,400 
50,600 
54,600 
33,200 
$3,186,860 
6,349,225 
4,781,526 
10,757,842 
$ 908,300 
963,000 
2,050,000 
350,000 
$4,095,160 
7,312,225 
6,831,526 
11,107,842 
6,662,545 1,878,000 8,540,545 
174.4 86 Earthfill 32,500 2,448,610 385,000 2,833,610 
171.2 133 Earthfill 18,300 2,982,048 1,378,400 4,360,448 
Gardner 
Athol 
Worcester 
Northampton 
Northampton 
Springfield 
Winsted 
Winsted 
Winsted 
153.3 
148.7 
130.2 
102.8 
102.0 
122.0 
56 Earthfill 
62 Earthfill 
62 Rockflillearth 
160 Earthfill 
150 Earthfill 
85 Rockfillearth 
116.0 223 Rockfillearth 
120.0 178 Earthfill 
118.5 68 Earthfill 
49,900 
22,000 
24,000 
49,000 
32,400 
3,740 
98,500 
1,740,679 
1,298,752 
1,928,819 
2,594,440 
5,863,412 
1,935,530 
3,075,000 
368,000 
39,000 
821,200 
1,150,000 
1,015,000 
4,815,679 
1,666,752 
1,967,819 
3,415,640 
7,013,412 
2,950,530 
8,341,971 5,922,000 14,263,971 
9,700 4,773,020 2,210,000 4 6,983,020 
1,480 2,227,792 180,0003 2,407,792 
1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 
2 For details, see individual report. 
3 Non-Federal cost. 
4 Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. 
1-66

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-N (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 
Miles Estimated Cost 
Above 
Mouth of 
Connec- Lands 
ticut and 
Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total 
Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 170.4 Channel improvement $ 2,591,000 - $ 2,591,000 
Charlestown, NH 181 Riverbank protection 113,330 - 113,330 
Chicopee, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,434,000 $ 250,000 1,684,000 
Chicopee Falls, MA 83 Wall and levee 2,600,000 70,000 2,670,000 
Connecticut River, Middletown, CT 31 Streambank protection 353,000 - 353,000 
East Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 2,143,084 271,000 2,414,084 
Farmington River, Simsbury, CT 60 Streambank protection 570,000 - 570,000 
Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 50 Channel improvement 220,284 - 220,284 
Gardner, MA 163 Dam and levee 510,691 35,000 545,691 
Gulf Street, Milford, CT - Slope protection 386,000 - 386,000 
Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 9,710,200 * 1,150,000 10,860,200 
Hartford, White River, VT 216 Channel improvement 332,236 - 332,236 
Holyoke, MA 85 Wall and levee 3,442,447 150,000 3,592,447 
Huntington, MA 100 Riverbank protection 3,900 - 3,900 
Israel R., Lancaster, NH 314 Gabion overflow weir 551,606 - 551,606 
Keene, NH 167 Channel improvement 44,146 - 44,146 
Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 200.3 Streambank stabilization 110,000 - 110,000 
Northampton, MA 94 Wall and levee 960,000 * 150,000 1,110,000 
North Stratford, NH 345 Slope protection 180,000 - 180,000 
Park River, CT 51 Conduit 58,876,919 1,300,000 60,176,914 
Riverdale, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,344,077 50,000 1,394,077 
Salmon R., Colchester, CT 38 Slope protection 247,100 - 247,100 
South River, Conway, MA 107 Slope protection 133,500 - 133,500 
Springdale, MA 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 
Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 937,350 2 272,000 1,209,350 
Three Rivers, MA 98 Wall and levee 1,577,189 700,000 2,277,189 
Ware, MA 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 
Weston, VT 195 Channel improvement 13,079 2,000 15,079 
West Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 2,043,452 * 30,000 2,073,452 
West Warren, MA 111 Wall and levee 430,176 64,000 494,176 
Winsted, CT 115 Channel improvement 245,500 30,000 275,500 
1 To be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests portion of relocation. 
2 Includes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 
s Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. 
4 Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. 
5 Includes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 
1-67

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-0 HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA 
(See Section 43 of Text) 
DAMS AND RESERVOIRS 1 
Miles Estimated Federal Cost 
Above 
Mouth of 
Nauga- Reservoir Lands 
tuck Height Capacity Constr- and 
Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages 2 Total 
Hall Meadow Torrington, CT 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $2,572,357 $1,290,000 3 $3,862,357 
earthfill 
East Branch Torrington, CT 43.7 92 Earthfill 4,350 1,959,836 1,290,000 a 3,249,836 
Thomaston Torrington, CT 30.5 142 Rock and 42,000 6,382,112 7,900,000 14,282,112 
earthfill 
Northfield Brook Torrington, CT 30.6 118 Earthfill 2,432 1,875,512 975,000 2,850,512 
Black Rock Waterbury, CT 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 
Hancock Brook Waterbury, CT 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 1,593,911 2,585,000 4,178,911 
Hop Brook Waterbury, CT 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,701,562 3,450,000 6,151,562 
1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 
2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 
3 Includes cost of lands borne by local interests. 
LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 1 
Miles Estimated Cost 
Above 
Mouth of 
Housa- Lands 
tonic and 
Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total 
Alford, Green River, MA 
Ansonia-Derby, CT 
Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA 
Danbury, CT 
Derby, CT 
Mad River, Waterbury 
(Woodtick Area), CT 
North Canaan, 
Blackberry River, CT 
Pittsfield, MA 
Salisbury, CT 
Sheffield, MA 
Squantz Pond, New 
Fairfield, CT 
Torrington, East Branch, CT 
Torrington, West Branch, CT 
Waterbury- Watertown, CT 
111.0 
13.0 
96.0 
56.0 
12.0 
35.0 
83.0 
133.0 
76.0 
96.0 
43.0 
51.0 
52.0 
32.0 
Earth dike and stone slope 
protection 
Wall, levee, channel 
improvement and pumping 
station 
Stone slope protection 
Walls, channel improvement 
and bridge replacememt 
Walls, levees and pumping 
station 
Channel improvements 
Snagging and clearing project 
Stone arch culvert 
Gabionade with slope 
protection 
Stone slope protection 
Timber Bulkhead 
Dike and channel improvement 
Walls, dikes and channel 
Wall, dike and channel 
$41,419 $ - $ 41,419 
18,266,040 1,178,000 19,444,040 
430,000 
13,143,000 
- 430,000 
1,862,000 15,005,000 
7,582,642 647,000 8,229,642 
2,100,000 
73,865 
739,003 
102,800 
202,608 
116,296 
389,237 
228,237 
263,300 
- 2,100,000 
- 73,865 
85,000 824,003 
- 102,800 
- 202,608 
- 116,296 
- 389,237 
- 228,237 
- 263,300 
1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 
2 To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. 
1-68

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-P MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH, AND MA 
(See Section 45 of Text) 
RESERVOIRS1 
Name Nearest City 
Franklin Falls 
Blackwater 
Hopkinton- 
Everett 
Edward 
MacDowell 
Phillips 
Whitmanville 
Franklin, NH 
Franklin, NH 
Concord, NH 
Concord, NH 
Keene, NH 
Fitchburg, MA 
Fitchburg, MA 
Miles 
Above 
Mouth of 
Merrimack 
River (feet) 
Estimated Federal Cost 
Reservoir 
Height Capacity 
Type (acre-feet) 
Construction 
Lands 
and 
Damages2 Total 
118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 $ 6,190,487 $ 1,760,000 $ 775C,487 
118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 766,746 553,000 , 9,74G 
87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 12,715,440 8,737,000 21,452,440 
161.3 
105.4 
110.6 
67 
48 
76 
Earthfill 
Earthfill 
Earthfill 
12,800 
1,600 
9,350 
1,708,253 
13,450,000 
11,590,000 
306,000 
7,350,000 
6,210,000 
2,014,253 
20,800,000 
17,800,000 
1 For details, see individual report. 
2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 
LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS1 
Miles Estimated Cost 
Above 
Mouth of 
Merri- Lands 
mack and 
Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total 
Amesbury, Powwow and 
Merrimack Rivers, MA 
Haverhill, MA 
Lowell, MA 
Nashua, NH 
North Nashua River, 
Leominster, MA 
North Nashua River, 
Leominster (Sewer Line), MA 
North Nashua River, MA 
Saxonville, MA 
3.0 
21.0 
39.0 
55.0 
94.0 
94.0 
100.5 
69.0 
Wall and revetment 
Floodwall, conduit and 
pumping station 
Wall and levee 
Wall and levee 
Stone slope protection 
Stone slope protection 
Channel improvement 
Wall, levee, channel 
$ 132,113 
1,863,485 
490,600 5 
270,000 
210,000 
$ - $ 132,113 
- 1,863,485 
90,000 
3,000 
300,000 
3,235,000 3 
4,218,700 
580,609 
273,000 
210,000 
300,000 
- 3,235,000 
530,000 4,748,700 
1 For details, see individual report. 
2 To be borne by local interests. 
3 Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration Funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. 
4 Excludes $15,000 expended from Contributed Funds. 
5 Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration Funds. 
1-69 
II_

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1995 
TABLE 1-Q THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA 
(See Section 54 of Text) 
RESERVOIRS1 
Miles Estimated Federal Cost 
Above 
Mouth of Reservoir Lands 
Thames Height Capacity ' Constr- and 
Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages Total 
Hodges Village Webster, MA 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 $1,317,268 $3,144,000 $4,461,268 
Buffumville Webster, MA 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 2,157,603 841,000 2,998,603 
East Brimfield Southbridge, MA 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 1,337,043 5,720,000 7,057,043 
Westville Southbridge, MA 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 2,284,683 3,400,000 5,684,683 
West Thompson Putman, CT 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 5,036,220 1,965,000 7,001,220 
Mansfield Hollow Willimantic, CT 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 4,107,164 2,340,000 6,447,164 
'For details, see individual report. 
2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 
LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 
Miles Estimated Cost 
Above 
Mouth of Lands 
Thames and 
Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total 
Norwich, CT 15.0 Channel improvements $1,209,000 $72,000 $1,281,000 
West River, New Haven, CT - Channel improvements 4,619,543 2 554,638 5,174,181 
2 Borne by local interests. 
2 Excludes $12,590 for revisions to flood insurance rate map and $71,650 Contributed funds not required. 
1-70

NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 
TABLE 1-R RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS 
Date Survey Date Survey 
Project Conducted Project Conducted 
CONNECTICUT 
Clinton Harbor 
Connecticut River 
Below Hartford 
Duck Island Harbor 
Eight Mile River 
Guilford Harbor 
New Haven Harbor 
New London Harbor 
Norwalk Harbor 
Stonington Harbor 
Stony Creek 
MAINE 
Bass Harbor 
Kennebec River 
Kennebunk River 
Penobscot River 
Portland Harbor 
Portsmouth Harbor and 
Piscataqua River 
Royal River 
Saint Croix River 
Wells Harbor 
Wood Island Harbor 
York Harbor 
MASSACHUSETTS 
Andrews River 
Buttermilk Bay 
Chatham (Stage) Harbor 
Duxbury Harbor 
Fall River Harbor 
Gloucester Harbor 
Merrimack River 
New Bedford Harbor 
Newburyport Harbor 
Plymouth Harbor 
Rockport Harbor 
Salem Harbor 
Nov/Dec 1994 
Jan/Feb/Mar 
Jul/Aug 1995 
Nov 1994 
Jan/Feb/Mar 1995 
Feb 1995 
Feb 1995 
Aug/Sep 1995 
Nov 1994 
Jun/Jul 1995 
Jun 1995 
Nov 1994 
Apr/May 1995 
Oct 1994 
Sep 1995 
Aug/Sep 1995 
Jan/Feb/Mar 1995 
Nov/Dec 1994 
Sep 1995 
Mar/Apr 1995 
Jun/Jul 1995 
May 1995 
Oct 1994 
Oct/Dec 1994 
Jan 1995 
May 1995 
Mar/Apr 1995 
Apr 1995 
Dec 1994 
Jan 1995 
Oct 1994 
May 1995 
Oct/Nov/Dec 1994 
Jan 1995 
Jan/Sep 1995 
May 1995 
Jul/Aug 1995 
Jun 1995 
Mar/Apr 1995 
Scituate Harbor 
Sesuit Harbor 
Weymouth Fore and 
Town River 
NEW HAMPSHIRE 
Hampton Harbor 
RHODE ISLAND 
Bullocks Pt. Cove 
Charlestown Breachway 
Harbor of Refuge, 
Block Island 
Little Narragansett 
Bay and Watch Hill Cove 
Point Judith Pond 
Jan 1995 
May 1995 
May/Jun/Sep 1995 
Oct/Nov 1994 
Feb 1995 
Oct 1994 
Jun 1995 
Apr/May 1995 
Oct/Nov/Dec 1994 
Jun 1995 
Major activities under the Dredged Material Management Program under PCS for fiscal year 1995 were (1) monitoring 
surveys at the Central Long Island Sound, Portland, and New London disposal sites (2 ) maintenance, replacement, and 
repositioning of disposal site buoys. Additionally, 10 monitoring or special study reports were completed and distributed to 
the public and regional resource agencies. Total cost of contracts was $650,000. Labor costs of $225,000 for program 
management, sampling, and testing, and environmental analysis were incurred. 
1-71

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT *
NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of 
western Massachusetts and Connecticut, eastern New York 
including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, 
embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain 
and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to the Atlantic 
Ocean from New York-Connecticut State Line to, but not 
including Manasquan Inlet, N.J. In addition it exercises jurisdiction 
over matters pertaining to improvement of Great 
Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the 
Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor 
of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the 
laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New 
York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary waters, and the waters 
of Long Island Sound. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
26. 
27. 
28. 
1 Aquatic Plant Control.... ................................. 2-3 
2. Brown's Creek, NY.................... ....... .............. .2-3 
3. East Rockaway Inlet, NY ....................... .................. 2-3 
4. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY ............... ................. 2-4 
5. Hudson River, NY ........................................... 2-4 
6. Kill Van Kull & Newark Bay, NJ & NY .................... 2-5 
7. Lake Montauk Harbor, NY ....................................... 2-5 
8. Mattituck Harbor, NY ........................................ 2-6 
9. Narrows and Lake Champlain, NY .............................. 2-6 
10 New York Harbor-Collection and 
Removal of Drift ............................... ........... ........... 2-7 
11. New York Harbor-Entrance Channels 
and Anchorage Areas.................. .. .......... ........ .... 2-7 
12. Shinnecock Inlet, NY........... ................ ...... 2-8 
13. Shrewbury River, NJ ........... ............... ........ 2-8 
14. Supervisor of New York Harbor ............................ 2-9 
15. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ................. 2-10 
16. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................ 2-10 
17. Navigation work under special authorization ............ 2-10 
Beach Erosion Control 
18. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet 
and Jamaica Bay, NY ............ ........... ................... 2-10 
19. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY .................... 2-10 
20. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point 
(Coney Island) NY ........................ ....................... 2-12 
21. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, NJ..............................2-12 
22. Other Authorized Beach Erosion 
control projects .............................. ........................ 2-13 
23. Beach erosion control work under 
special authorization ....................................... 2-13 
Flood Control 
24. 
25. 
Inspection of completed flood control projects..........2-14 
Other authorized flood control projects ..................2-14 
Flood control work under 
special authorization ................... ...................... 2-14 
General Investigations 
29. 
30. 
31. 
Surveys................................2-15 
Collection and study of basic data .................... 2-15 
Deauthorized projects .......................... ................ 2-15 
Tables 
Table 2-A Cost & Financial Statement.........................2-16 
Table 2-B Authorizing legislation.................................2-19 
Table 2-C Hudson River, NY Features of 
Lock and Dam Included in 
Existing Project ....................... ................. 2-22 
Table 2-E Supervisor of New York Harbor 
Statement of Activities...................................2-23 
Table 2-F Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys ........... 2-23 
Table 2-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 2-24 
Table 2-H Other Authorized Beach 
Erosion Control Projects ............................... 2-26 
Table 2-I Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects ........................................ 2-26 
Table 2-J Surveys ........................................................ .2-27 
Table 2-K Preconstruction Engineering and Design ........ 2-27 
Table 2-L Cost for Flood Plain Management 
Services .................................. .................... 2-27 
Table 2-M Deauthorized Projects ...................................... 2-28 
Table 2-N Section 107 Study ...................................... 2-29 
Table 2-0 Section 103 Studies ....................................... 2-29 
Table 2-P Section 205 Reports ..................................... 2-29 
North Ellenville, NY ........................................ 2-13 
Passaic River Basin, NJ & NY ............................... 2-13 
2-1 
Navigation Page Flood Control (Cont'd) Page

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
2-2

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL 
Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting 
channels, and other allied waters in New York District. 
Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication 
of water chestnut. Eurasian water milfoil, and other 
obnoxious aquatic plant growths from the navigable waters, 
tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters 
of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, 
flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, 
public health, and related purposes, including continued 
research for development of the most effective and economic 
control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests were required to provide 
30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 
River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free 
from damages. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
changed the local responsibility from 30% to 50%. In FY 87 the 
States involved in the program were permitted to keep the cost 
sharing at 30% by order of the Secretary of the Army. Starting 
FY 88, however, local sponsors contributed 50% of the costs. 
Operations and results during period. FY 1995 has been 
the fourteenth year of a control program started in FY 1982 for 
the removal of nuisance aquatic plants in the Lake Champlain 
Basin, Vermont. Recent work continued the removal of water 
chestnut and eurasian milfoil from portions of the basin. 
Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report 
covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic 
Division areas was completed in August 1967. The General 
Design Memorandum for this program was completed in March 
1982 by the State of Vermont. The total Federal cost of this 
control program to date is $2,019,414. In FY 1995, the New 
York District cost-shared a FY 1995 program with the State of 
Vermont which removed nearly 1500 acres of aquatic plants. 
The total cost of this program was $175,000. In October 1991, 
Waterways Experiment Station was directed to conduct a multiyear 
study which would identify and test potential biocontrol 
agents of water chestnuts. Results are good, as certain organisms 
have tested successfully as biocontrol agents of water chestnut. 
This research was extended to FY 1996. The New York District 
is currently coordinating with the State of Vermont on costsharing 
the FY 1996 program. The proposed work plan includes 
various bodies of water in the Lake Champlain Basin. 
2. BROWN'S CREEK, NY 
Location. A narrow, crooked tidal stream emptying into 
Great South Bay, near Sayville, Long Island, N.Y., about 15 
miles by water northeast of Fire Island Inlet, and about 65 miles 
by water east of New York City. (See National Ocean Survey 
Chart 12352.) 
Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep 
at mean low water from 6 foot contour in Great South Bay for 
1,850 feet, and thence, with same width, 4 feet deep for 1,350 
feet; also for two stone jetties to protect the entrance, east jetty 
to be 448 feet long and west jetty 700 feet long. Section included 
in project is about 0.6 mile. Mean tidal range, 0.6 feet; mean 
range of spring tides 0.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind 
and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.8 feet below mean low 
water up to 3.2 feet above mean high water. Cost of new work 
for completed portion of project is $33,976. Dredging of channel 
to a depth of 4 feet for 3,300 feet northward to upper limit 
of project and extension of jetties; east jetty to 1,400 feet long 
and west jetty 1,600 feet long were deauthorized in 1977. (See 
Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation. 
Local cooperation. None Required. 
Terminal facilities. Numerous terminals, including several 
ferries, with a total available dockage of 7,980 feet, are scattered 
along shore of creek between its mouth and head of 
improved channel. Three are publicly owned; all are open to the 
public. None has rail connections. Facilities are considered adequate 
for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during period. A contract for 
maintenance dredging of the channel was awarded December 
22, 1994. Dredging of the channel was completed February 27, 
1995 with the removal of 20,300 cubic yards of material. 
Operations and Maintenance funds in the amout of $297,314 
was expended on Browns Creek during FY 1995. 
Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project 
was commenced August 1891 and completed July 1927. 
East jetty was completed to a length of 448 feet in 1893. West 
jetty was completed to a length of 492 feet in 1892 and extended 
in 1927 to a total length of 700 feet. Six-foot channel has been 
completed for 1,350 feet. 
3. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY 
Location. On south shore of Long Island between main 
body of island and western end of Long Beach. It is 10 miles 
east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and 
east from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean 
Survey Chart 12353.) 
Existing Project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water 
and 250 feet wide from 12 foot contour in Long Beach Channel 
protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet; mean range of 
spring tides, 5.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and 
atmosphere pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water 
up to 5.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed 
project cost $603,969, including $100,000 contributed funds. 
(See Table 2-B for Authorization Legislation.) 
Local Cooperation. Complied with. 
Teminal facilities. There are numerous terminals in 
Oceanside. Island Park, Long Beach, and East Rockaway, 
including oil terminals. Other terminals are repair and mooring 
docks with mechanical handling facilities. There are public 
wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on north 
side of Long Beach has been bulkheaded. Facilities are consid- 
2-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
ered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during period. A contract for the 
repair of the riprap jetty was awarded on September 30, 1993. 
The jetty repair (1800') was completed in April, 1995. 
Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $479,000 
was expended on East Rockaway during FY '95. 
Conditions as of September 30. Work under existing project 
began February 1933 and is 100 percent complete. East jetty, 
4,250 feet long was completed in July 1934. Project channel 
was completed in May, 1935. 
4. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, NY, 
Location. On south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by 
water south and east of the Battery, New York City. Fire Island 
Inlet is the main entrance into Great South Bay from the 
Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) 
Existing project. A jetty at Fire Island Inlet extending generally 
southwest and south for 5,000 feet from high ground on 
Democrat Point at the west end of Fire Island and a channel 14 
feet deep and 450 feet wide along the northern edge of the 
Inlet's shoaling area connecting the ocean to the deep water in 
the Inlet. Mean tidal ranges at the ocean and inlet ends of 
Democrat Point are 4.1 feet and 2.4 feet respectively. Irregular 
fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 
2.5 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high 
water on the ocean side. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Requires cost sharing and lands, easements 
and rights-of-way: 
Terminal facilities. Great South Bay has extensive public 
and private facilities for mooring and servicing recreational 
boats. Much of this traffic uses the inlet during the boating season, 
and some traffic (Coast Guard craft and party and head 
fishing boats) continues throughout the year. 
Operations and results during period. The third scheduled 
nourishment cycle was performed by a continuing contract. It 
commenced on September 14, 1994 and was completed on 
March 15, 1995. A total of 1,537,000 cubic yards of sand was 
dredged from Fire Island Inlet and deposition basins and placed 
along Gilgo Beach, with 200,000 cubic yards (totally State 
financed) being stockpiled at Democrat Point on Fire Island. 
Contract cost was $12,303,300 ($8,154,400 Construction 
General funds; $1,436,900 Operation and Maintenance funds; 
and $2,712,000 provided by the State of New York. 
Condition as of September 30. The jetty, completed in 
1941, surpassed its capacity as a sand entrapping agent in a little 
over a decade. Since then extensive sand bars and shoals 
continued to form west of the jetty and in the inlet throat. 
Hydraulic dredging in the inlet was undertaken in 1959 and 
again in 1964 under a combined beach erosion control and navigation 
authorization (1958 Act). Since then 3 more hydraulic 
dredging operations were conducted starting in 1973 and completed 
in 1977 under provisions of the 1962 Act (see Table 2B). 
Maintenance dredging using small hopper dredges has also 
been done from time to time. Due to local concerns about inlet 
dredging and consequent erosion at Oak Beach, maintenance 
had been deferred since 1979 which allowed the complete 
shoaling of the authorized project channel. To facilitate navigation 
in this period the existing natural channel was dredged in 
FY 1985 and in FY 1987. In FY 1987 sand was deposited offshore 
of Gilgo Beach by hopper dredge using operations and 
maintenance funds. O&M funds were also used during FY 
1987 and 1988 to make repairs to the inner portion of the jetty. 
In March 1988 the District recommended a plan to maintain 
a realigned channel in the vicinity of the natural channel to a 
depth of 14 feet (plus 2 feet of allowable overdepth) and a width 
of 450 feet. The plan also recommended placement of the 
dredged material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purposes. 
The recommended plan was approved by the Assistant 
Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on 2 August 1988. 
Since FY 1990 the realigned channel was dredged to project 
depth each year with placement of material along Gilgo Beach 
for shore protection purpose. 
5. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. 
Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 
miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the 
Battery, New York City, and flows generally southerly into New 
York Bay- Section under improvement extends from New York 
City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See National Ocean Survey 
Charts 12335, 12341, 12343, 12347, 12348, and 14786.) 
Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 
and 1938, pages 164 and 226, respectively. 
Existing projects. A channel 600 feet wide from New York 
City to Kingston, and thence 400 feet wide to Albany. with 
widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet 
long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, I near Hudson and I near 
Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 
feet; all with depths of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in 
rock to 2.200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep 
and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of Mall Bridge, thence 14 
feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to 
Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet 
wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and 
removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and 
dam about 2.5 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed 
by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging 
and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal 
dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the 
State of NY. 
In the tidal section below the Federal dam at Troy, the 
assumed lowest low water plane downstream to Albany is 3 feet 
2-4

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
below mean sea level. Mean tidal range is about 5 feet below the 
dam and about 4.9 feet at Albany. The normal pool level above 
the dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.3 feet above mean sea 
level, with the mean range of pool level in seasons of moderate 
rains being 2.2 feet. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam 
included in existing project.) New work for completed project 
cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous 
projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, N.Y., 
to 12 feet deep at a cost of $522,000 (1954) and completion of 
27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was 
placed in deferred for restudy category, and has since been 
deauthorized. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing 
description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction 
of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 
2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests 
must furnish suitable soil disposal areas for future maintenance 
as required. 
Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6 
Operations and results during period. A continuing contract 
in the amount of $2,530,500 was awarded on September 
1, 1995 to Gulf Coast Trailing Company for maintenance 
dredging of Discontinuous reaches of the Hudson River 
between Stuyvesant and Germantown, New York. Operations 
and Maintenance Funds in the amount of $400,000 were 
expended during FY '95 to initiate the contract work. In addition, 
Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of 
$83,008 were expended on engineering, design, supervision and 
administration for the dredging contract during FY 1995. 
Government plant and hired labor were employed through 
the fiscal year performing dredging design surveys and project 
condition surveys at a total cost including supervision and 
administration of $266,939 for maintenance in FY 1995. 
Government plant and hired labor were employed throughout 
the fiscal year 1995 with operation and maintenance of the Troy 
Lock and Dam, including the associated buildings and grounds. 
Operation of the Lck was suspended for the 1994 navigation 
season on November 30, 1994 and was resumed for the 1995 
navigation season on May 1, 1995. Total funds expended for the 
operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and the 
associated buildings and grounds including performing instrumentation 
monitoring, supervision and administration was 
$874,815 for FY 1995. In addition, Operations and Maintenance 
funds in the amount of $22,151 were expended performing 
activities associated with the periodic inspection of the lock 
and dam. 
Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project 
began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in 
November 1965. New lock and dam at Troy, removal of dam at 
Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are 
complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet were 
raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York City to 
Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 
linear foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project 
which has never been dredged to project depth. Channel from 
Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet. 
6. KILL VAN KULL - NEWARK BAY CHANNEL, 
NJ & NY 
Location. The project includes Kill Van Kull connecting 
upper New York Bay with Newark Bay, and channels in lower 
Newark Bay serving Port Newark and Elizabeth Marine Terminal. 
These terminals are located on the west shore of Newark 
Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12333.) 
Existing project. Deepening the existing Kill Van Kull 
channel and channels in lower Newark Bay, including turning 
and maneuvering areas, as well as deepening the Elizabeth and 
Port Newark channels. The deepening to be done from the 
existing 35 foot depth incrementally to 40 feet and then 44 feet. 
The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $326,200,000 
with an additional $204,300,000 to be contributed by local 
interests. 
Local cooperation. The Port Authority of New York and 
New Jersey, the local cooperating agency, has entered into a 
local cooperation agreement with the Government which was 
executed on 30 May 1986. A supplemental agreement was executed 
on 21 May 1987. 
Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. 
Operations and results during period, and condition as of 
Sept. 30. Stage 1, channel deepening to 40 feet in seven contracts 
was substantially completed. Contract No.l, awarded in June 
1987, is completed. Contract No. 2 was awarded in July 1988 
and is completed. Contract No. 3 was awarded in Sept. 1988 
and is completed. Removal of rock and hard material in the Kill 
Van Kull and Newark Bay was divided in three contracts, 4A, 
4B and 4C. Contract 4A was awarded in April 1991 and was 
completed in Sept. 1995. Contract No. 5 was awarded in May 
1988 and is complete. Contract 4C was awarded in September 
1994 and was completed in July 1995. Stage 2, channel deepening 
to 45 feet has commenced with start of work on a General Reevaluation 
Report, to be completed June, 1997. 
7. LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY 
Location. On east end of Long Island, about 3 miles by land 
west of Montauk Point and 125 miles by water east of New York 
City. It is land-locked on the east, south and west sides and is 
connected to the north with Block Island Sound by an artificial 
inlet. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13209). 
Existing Project. A channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide 
extending from 12-foot contour in Block Island Sound to same 
depth in existing yacht basin east of Star Island; a boat basin 10 
feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long, northwest of Star 
2-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Island; repair and extension shoreward of the east and west 
jetties; and additon of sport fishing facilities on top of both jetties. 
Section included in the project is 0.7 miles long. Mean tidal 
range, 1.9 feet; mean range of spring tides, 2.2 feet. Irregular 
fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2 
feet below mean low water up to 7 feet above mean high water. 
For latest published map see project document. (See Table 2-B 
for Authorizing Legislation). 
Legal cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are numerous marinas and mooring 
facilities for recreational boats. In addition, two terminals are 
used for commercial fishing vessels. None of the terminals have 
rail connections or are equipped with freight handling devices. 
Terminals are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during period. A contract for 
maintenance dredging of the channel was awarded December 2, 
1994. Dredging of the channel was completed January 17, 1995 
with the removal of 46,200 cubic yards of material. A contract for 
the rehabilitation of the eastern jetty was awarded on September 
6, 1995. The jetty repair is expected to be completed in June, 
1996. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of 
$732,290 was expended on Lake Montauk Harbor during FY '95. 
Conditions as of September 30. Work under existing project 
was commenced August 1942 and was completed 
November 1968. Dredging entrance channel and shoreward 
extension of west jetty were performed from August 1942 to 
January 1943, at the request of the Navy Department with Navy 
funds. Extension of east jetty and repair of both jetties and 
dredging the boat basin was completed November 1968. 
8. MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY 
Location. A tidal inlet on North shore of Long Island, 85 
miles east of the Battery, New York City, and 24 miles southeast 
of New Haven Harbor, CT, extending southwards about 2 1/4 
miles to village of Mattituck. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 
12358). 
Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water 
from Long Island Sound to a 460- by 570- foot anchorage area 
at village of Mattituck, protected at the entrance by two parallel 
jetties 500 feet apart, channel widths are 200 feet at entrance, 80 
feet elsewhere. Total length is about 2.2 miles. Mean tidal range 
at entrance, 4.9 feet; at Old Mill Bridge, Waterville, 5.1 feet; 
mean range of spring tides at entrance, 5.8 feet; at Old Mill 
Bridge, 6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric 
pressure vary from 2.2 feet below mean low water up to 
6.6 feet above mean high water. 
Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests 
must furnish spoil-disposal areas for maintenance. 
Terminal facilities. Lower portion of harbor contains four 
commercial and two recreational boating terminals. Commercial 
terminals are used for handling petroleum products, sand, gravel, 
building materials, fish and shellfish. Recreational terminals 
have mooring accommodations available for 20 boats and facilities 
for the sale of gasoline, oil, bait, miscellaneous supplies and 
for repair services. Upper portion of harbor contains facilities 
for recreational craft which are open to the general public. 
Operations and results during period. A contract for rehabilitation 
western jetty was awarded on April 7, 1995. The jetty 
repair (1200') is expected to be completed by October 1996. 
Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $1,007,724 
were expended during FY '95. 
Conditions as of September 30. Project is complete. 
Original dredging was completed in 1914. East jetty was completed 
in 1906 for a 775-foot length. West jetty was completed 
in 1938. 
9. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, NY &VT 
Location. This waterway. 37 miles long, comprises southern 
end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown 
Point, N.Y. at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson 
Landing, VT. (See N.O.S. Chart 14784). 
Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 
1931, and 1963, pages 256 and 177, respectively. 
Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, N.Y. 
at head of Lake Champlain to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at 
low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of 
fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, 
Pulpit Point and, Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low take 
level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project 
is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 
5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 
8.8 feet above low lake level. 
Widening channel throughout its entire length to project 
width of 200 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing 
description of existing project and cost estimate. (See Table 2- 
B for Authorizing Legislation. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during period. Government plant 
and hired labor were employed intermittently during the fiscal 
year 1995 in the removal of stumps and snags that posed a 
potential hazard to navigation at a cost of $29,435. Government 
plant and hired labor were employed in the replacement of deteriorated 
fender booms at a cost of $3,975. Operations and 
Maintenance funds in the amount of $9,191 were expended in 
FY 1995 on project condition surveys. 
Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing 
project was commenced June 1919 and is about 77 percent 
complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least 
width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of 
the improvement, except at the Elbow, where the width is 110 
feet. Fender booms have. been placed at the elbow. (Putts Leap 
and Putts Rock.) 
2-6

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
10. NEW YORK HARBOR-COLLECTION AND 
REMOVAL OF DRIFT 
Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York 
Harbor; East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, 
N.Y., New York and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, N.J. 
and their tributaries. 
Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal 
of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and 
debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, 
and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore 
structures. Work authorized before Act of 1974 was restricted 
solely to removal of drift from waterway and was funded as 
maintenance activity. The current estimate of first cost is 
$274,500,000 (October 1995 P.L.) including $65,000,000 cash 
contribution from local interests plus $84,500,000 to be contributed 
for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in 
use. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the 
plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide 
that local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rightsof-
way required for the improvement; hold the United States 
free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent 
creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of 
the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to 
deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source 
of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by the 
Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 
113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. 
Operations and results (New work-cumulative to date). 
A total of five Liberty State Park contracts have been completed 
at a cost of $10,321,211. East River-Manhattan Waterfront contract 
was completed at a cost of $1,477,806. A contract for the 
removal of pier 17 and 18 on the East River was completed at a 
cost of $219,604. The City of Elizabeth contract was completed 
at a cost of $791,656. The Stapleton, Staten Island contract was 
completed at a cost of $2,910,400. A contract for the city of 
Hoboken was completed at a cost of $2,123,404. Working along 
the Jersey City South waterfront was completed at the cost of 
$979,580. Contract Number One at Weehawken to Edgewater 
was completed at a cost of $1,697,487. The Brooklyn Reach 
One contract was completed at a cost of $5,057,920. Work is 
completed on the Weehawken to Edgewater contract No. 2 and 
Jersey City North Contract No. 2. The Bayonne One contract 
has been completed at a cost of $735,800. Hoboken Pier B was 
completed at a cost of $973,590, and Jersey City North I was 
completed at a cost of $2,358,000. Weehawken-Edgewater 
Contract 2A was awarded in May, 1994 and is nearing completion. 
Engineering and design is in progress for Brooklyn Reach 2A, 
Brooklyn Reach 2B, the Shooters Island Reach, the Arthur Kill, 
NY & NJ Reaches, the Bayonne 2 Reach, the Passaic River 
Reach, and the Kill Van Kull Reach. 
Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster, Gelberman 
and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the task of 
removing and disposing of floating debris that is a hazard to 
navigation. Removal and disposal of 552,840 cubic feet ( 4,319 
cords ) of floating debris consisting mainly of driftwood, ranging 
in size from small blocks to large timbers, including pilings, 
pieces of wreckage, derelict vessels and sections of deteriorated 
pier structure was accomplished at a cost of $4,512,700 in FY 
1995. 
Conditions as of September 30. For work authorized by 
Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has 
been completed in New Jersey at Liberty State Park, the City of 
Elizabeth, Hoboken, and parts of Jersey City, Weekawken and 
Edgewater. The New York City work has been completed along 
the Manhattan side of the East River, along part of the Brooklyn 
waterfront, and at Stapleton, Staten Island. 
11. NEW YORK HARBOR-ENTRANCE CHANNELS 
AND ANCHORAGE AREAS 
Location. In Upper and Lower Bays, New York Harbor is 
330 miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor. Mass., and 
165 miles northeast of entrance to Delaware Bay, N.J. The 
Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of 
Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City to 
the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the 
Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey charts 12334, 
12335, and 12349.) 
Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 
feet wide. extending about 10.2 miles from sea to deep water 
in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, an extension of 
Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay 
opposite anchorage grounds, about 5.7 miles long; and southerly 
entrance channel. Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 
feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 
35-foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment 
generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from 
authorized project of that portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel 
east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for 
Bayside Channel 35 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending 
about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower 
bay; a channel along New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill 
Van Kull with deep water in anchorage Channel, south of 
Liberty Island anchorage. 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with 
widening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an 
anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 
acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal 
to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 
about 2.3 miles long, extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman 
and Swinburne Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hooks 
Flats to depths of 45,40 and 35 feet and an anchorage area in 
Gravesand Bay to 47 feet deep. Project depths refer to mean 
low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 feet at Fort Hamilton; mean 
range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind 
and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low 
water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water. 
2-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Location cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. 
Operations and results during period. Completed twoyear 
Harbor Apex Model Development Effort in Support of 
NYH-DMMP Study. Completed two-year Biological Baseline 
Data Collection Effort in Support of NYH-DMMP Phase 1 
"Plan-of-Study" Report, modeling and biological baseline data 
collection efforts with other agencies and involved groups. 
Prepared the final DYH-DMMP Report approved by the 
District Engineer in July, 1995. Initiated Critical Phase 2 Study 
efforts (e.g. physical baseline data collection, preliminary upland 
disposal site screening, aquatic containment site modeling 
scenarios, etc.) The total cost expended on these studies was 
$2,666,500. 
Final physical and chemical surveys were performed at the 
Mud Dump Site to complete the requirements of the Dioxin 
Management and Monitoring Plan. With financial support from 
the District, EPA performed surveys, collected samples and 
issued data reports which evaluated the area surrounding the 
existing dump site to issue an EIS to expand and designate a 
new ocean disposal site. WES continued to work on several 
studies evaluating disposal and capping in open water. The total 
cost of this work was $4,010,400. 
The total Operations and Maintenance funds expended on 
New York Harbor during FY '95 was $6,676,900. 
Condition as of September 30. Work under existing projects 
began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and 
Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in 
February 1891. Deepening of Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 
feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. 
Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 
2.000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet 
for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage 
Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 
800 feet was dredged to 45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 
600-foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600-foot strip was substantially 
completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten 
Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was completed in 
December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of the 
project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no 
further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. 
Channel along New Jersey pierhead line from Kill Van Kull to 
Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at 
bends nearly southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 
was completed to depths of 45, and 35 feet in October 1976. 
Anchorage Channel was relocated to the westward in 1982. 
Red Hook Flats Anchorage was accordingly increased in area. 
No dredging was required. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage 
was completed to 20 feet in October 1944. Sandy Hook 
Channel (east section was completed to a depth of 35 feet in 
June 1963. Gravesend Bay was completed to a 47- foot depth 
in November 1977. 
12. SHINNECOCK INLET, NY 
Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 95 miles 
east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the 
sandy barrier beach, connecting Shinnecock Bay with the 
Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep (mlw) 
and 200 feet wide with a deposition basin, thence extending 
through the inlet to Shinnecock Bay for a distance of about 0.7 
mile thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long 
Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of about 1 mile: rehabilitation 
of the existing jetties and revetments. Estimate of cost 
for work is S22,300.000 of which the Federal share is 
$16,900,000 and non-Federal share is $5,400,000. 
Local cooperation. The navigation improvement will accrue 
both recreational and commercial benefits which result in a first 
cost allocation of 69 percent Federal and 31 percent non- 
Federal. The authorizing document also requires that local 
authorities: provide without cost to the United States, all lands 
easements, rights-of-way, and suitable disposal areas for the 
initial work and for subsequent maintenance, when and as 
required; hold and save the United States free from damages 
due to the construction and maintenance of the project; maintain 
and operate the works after completion in accordance with 
regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide 
and maintain suitable terminal facilities when and as required 
for the accommodation of vessels that would navigate the inlet 
and adjacent bays, open to all on equal terms; maintain, for the 
duration of the economic life of the project, continued public 
ownership of the publicly owned shores and their administration 
for public use, and continued availability for public use of 
the privately owned shores upon which a portion of the Federal 
share of the costs is based. A Local Cooperation Agreement for 
the dredging element of the project was executed with the New 
York State Department of Environmental Conservation on 7 
June 90. A Local Cooperation Agreement for the jetty reconstruction 
phase of work was executed on Dec 10, 1991. 
Terminal facilities. Shinnecock Bay, and adjacent ocean 
area, constitute an important marine fishery. The public fishing 
facility includes three docks, one of which, the Shinnecock 
Fishermens Cooperative, stores and market the catch for the 
fishermen. 
Condition as of September 30. A contract was awarded on 
March 31, 1992 for Jetty Repair and maintenance dredging for 
Shinnecock Inlet. Jetty repair commenced on May 21, 1992 
and is continuing. The initial dredging and first maintenance 
dredging of the channel has been completed. Work on the jetty 
re-construction project was completed in November, 1994. 
13. SHREWSBURY RIVER, NJ 
Location. Mainly a large tidal basin in eastern part of New 
Jersey, the outlet being at the southeast end of Sand Hook. (see 
National Ocean Survey Chart 12324). 
2-8

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports of 1915, 
1918, and 1938, pages 1778,373, and 267, respectively. 
Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide, 
following the westerly shore, from deep water in Sandy Hook 
Bay 2.2 miles to a point 500 feet south of former location of 
railroad bridge at Highlands; then 9 feet deep and generally 150 
feet wide, suitably widened at bends and turns, in south branch 
of river 6.8 miles to Branchport Avenue Bridge in city of Long 
Branch; and a channel in north branch (Navesink R.) 6 feet deep 
and 150 feet wide 6.1 miles from the junction to Red Bank. 
Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide at 
Highlands, 3.8 feet; at Seabright, 1.7 feet; at Branchport, 1.7 
feet; and at Red Bank, 3 feet. Mean range of spring tides is 4.7., 
2.1, 2.2, and 3.6 feet respectively, irregular fluctuations due to 
wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.9 feet below mean 
low water up to 6.5 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B 
for Authorization Legislation). 
Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1950 provides 
local interests furnish lands, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal 
areas for construction and future maintenance; hold the United 
States free from damages; provide and maintain a suitable public 
wharf on each of the creeks to be improved, which shall be 
open to all on equal terms; remove Locust Avenue bridge over 
Claypit Creek; and make cash contributions of $25,000, 
$33,000 and $27,500 toward cost of improvement of Claypit, 
Oceanport, and Little Silver Creeks, respectively. Provided further 
that construction of any unit of proposed improvement may 
be undertaken independently of the other units when the 
required local cooperation has been provided. These conditions 
have not been fulfilled. Requirements under prior acts have 
been fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are numerous terinals along the 
waterway. Some of which are open to the public. In addition, 
many private pleasure boat landings have been constructed by 
owners of riverfront property. None of the terminals has direct 
rail connections. Facilities considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations and results during period. A continuing contract 
for maintenance for maintaining dredging of the channel 
was awarded September 29, 1995. Dredging of the channel is 
expected to be completed in June, 1996 with the removal of 
22,000 cubic yards of material. Operations and Maintenance 
funds in the amount of $194,243 was expected on Shrewsbury 
River during FY '95. 
Condition as of September 30. Work under the active portion 
of existing project began in October 1919. Work completed 
consisted of providing authorized project dimensions in 12-foot 
entrance channel, 9-foot channel in South Branch, and a 6-foot 
channel in North Branch of the river. Work remaining dredging 
an inlet channel across the base of Sandy Hook protected by jetties 
and bulkheads, a bay channel extending to the existing 
Shrewbury River Channel and a six-lane fixed highway, bridge 
to span the new inlet as authorized by the River and Harbor Act 
of 1965) was subsequently reclassified to inactive because of 
state and local opposition. Formal close out of this work remains. 
Under the River and Harbor Act of 1950 work remaining consists 
of dredging turning basin and anchorage in vicinity of Red Bank 
and channels in Claypit, Oceanport, and Little Silver Creeks. 
Note: Work under the Acts of 1950 and 1965 has since been 
deauthorized. 
14. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR 
(PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTION 
AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) 
The District Engineer, New York District, was designated 
Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the 
River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as 
amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New 
York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the 
deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York 
Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long 
Island Sound. The River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 
(33 U.S.C. 452) makes it unlawful for any person or persons to 
engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels 
leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way 
with the safe navigation of deep draft traffic; the River and 
Harbor Act of March 3. 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 407, 409) prohibits 
obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized 
structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and willful or 
negligent abandonment of vessels. Other laws relating to the 
supervision of New York Harbor and its tributary waters are the 
Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries 
Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, 
the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 
1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 
1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water 
Conservation Fund Act. 
Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the 
New York District is accomplished by means of a patrol vessel 
whose scope of duty includes surveillance of the water front for 
unauthorized construction or fill, surveillance of tows enroute to 
dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material 
is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor, and 
investigation of wrecks and abandoned vessels. In addition to 
the patrol vessels, whose range of patrol is limited to New York 
Harbor, inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with 
two-way radios patrol shorefront facilities and property. The 
inspectors operate out of the New York District Office. Their 
duties include inspection of authorized construction, fill or 
excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to ensure that 
work is performed in accordance with the Corps permit, as well 
as investigating unauthorized construction activities. The 
inspectors also patrol all waterways in their respective areas and 
inform the public of the Corps' role and jurisdiction as well as 
provide assistance in the preparation of permit application. (See 
Table 2-E at end of chapter.) 
2-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
15. RECONNAISSANCE AND 
CONDITION SURVEYS 
(See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 
16. OTHER AUTHORIZED 
NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 
17. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 
86th Congress as amended (Pre-authorization). 
(See Table 2-N at end of chapter.) 
BEACH EROSION CONTROL 
18. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO 
ROCKAWAY INLET & JAMAICA BAY, NY 
Location. Atlantic coast of New York City, between East 
Rockaway and Rockaway Inlets, and the lands within and surrounding 
Jamaica Bay. The coastal area (about 10 miles long) is 
a peninsula in Queens County separating the ocean and the bay. 
(See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327, 12350, and 12326). 
Existing project. The projects consists of nourishing 100 foot 
wide beach at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water 
from Beach 149th Street to 19th Street. Periodic nourishment (5 
contracts) previously took place between 1979 and 1988. A 
Section 934 Report approved in February 1994, recommended 
continued nourishment over a nine year period. Federal participation 
includes first cost and periodic beach nourishment, the 
total estimated at $61,470,000 (Oct. 1995 P.L.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and 
rights-of-way, including borrow areas; bear a portion of the total 
cost as a cash contribution; hold the United States free from 
damages; maintain, during economic life of a project, continued 
public ownership and use of non-Federal publicly-owned shores 
upon which Federal paarticipation in beach protection is based; 
maintain and operate all works after completion, control water 
pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of 
bathers; local cooperation agreement was executed by the State 
May 17, 1974 and approved for Secretary of Army May 21, 1974. 
On May 22, 1974 sent to State an approved Escrow Agreement. 
Operations and results during period and condition as of 
September 30. A draft report on monitoring study of the completed 
project has been provided to the Waterways Experiment 
Station who will publish an official report. Final Environmental 
Impact Statement on file with Council of Environmental 
Quality on April 16, 1971. Initial beach restoration completed 
in FY 1977. Contract for first increment of periodic nourishment 
was completed in August, 1982. Contract for construction 
of stone groin at Beach 149th Street was completed in 
September, 1982. Periodic nourishment contracts Nos. 3, 4, and 
completed. Contract No. 6 was awarded in July, 1995 and is 
scheduled for completion in October, 1996. 
19. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO 
MONTAUK POINT, NY 
Location. That portion of Atlantic Coast of Long Island in 
Suffolk County extending from Fire Island Inlet easterly to 
Montauk Point, N.Y. about 83 miles long. This frontage comprises 
about 70 percent of total ocean frontage of Long Island. Fire 
Island Inlet is about 50 miles by water east of the Battery, New 
York. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 13209, 12354 and 12353.) 
Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in improvement 
to prevent beach erosion and hurricane damages by: 
widening beaches along developed areas between Kismet and 
Mecox Bay, to a minimum width 100 feet at elevation 14 feet 
above mean sea level; raising dunes to an elevation of 20 feet 
above mean sea level from Fire Island Inlet to Hither Hills State 
Park, at Montauk and opposite Lake Montauk Harbor; planting 
grass on dunes; constructing gated interior drainage structures 
at Mecox Bay, Sagaponack Lake, and Georgica Pond; constructing 
not to exceed 50 groins, if needed; and Federal participation 
in cost of beach nourishment. 
Local Cooperation. The New York State Department of 
Environmental Conservation is the local cooperating agency. 
The State agreed to provide necessary lands, rights of way and 
borrow areas, and furnish 30 percent of the project costs. The 
most recent letter of intent received from NYSDEC (4/23/93) is 
in regard to the proposed Interim Project along the Moriches 
Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet reach of the authorized project. 
Project history. On July 30, 1963, the State reflecting the 
desires of Suffolk County, requested the inclusion of a minimum 
of 13 groins in initial construction of Moriches- 
Shinnecock reach. Chief of Engineers concurred in inclusion of 
up to 13 groins. Assurances were executed by Superintendent 
of Public Works, State of New York, on August 14, and accepted 
by the District Engineer August 20, 1963. On February 5, 
1964, the State requested consideration of a plan, as proposed 
by Suffolk County, for initial construction of 13 groins of which 
11 would be in the Moriches-Shinnecock reach, and 2 in the 
Southampton-Beach Hampton reach vicinity of Georgica Pond, 
and that sandfill and dune construction be withheld for the present 
except for 1 mile on each side of Shinnecock Inlet. On 
February 27, 1964, the chief of Engineers accepted the proposals, 
in part, and supplemental assurances were executed by State 
of New York on April 20, 1964, and accepted by District 
Engineer April 27, 1964, as follows: the State of New York now 
elects to proceed with authorized combined beach erosion control 
and hurricane protection project for South Shore of Long 
Island; that Superintendent of Public Works hereby reaffirms 
his assurance of August 14, 1963, relative to complete project; 
that State of New York, as cooperating agency, will now agree 
that artificial fills will be added when and to extent found necessary 
by the Chief of Engineers, but not earlier than 3 years 
5 have been 
2-10

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
after completion of groins unless both the State of New York 
and the Chief of Engineers mutually agree to an earlier placement; 
that the superintendent agrees for State of New York to 
contribute the full amount of any increase in Federal costs 
resulting from the separate construction of the groins and subsequent 
fill; and that the State agree that construction of the two 
groins in the Georgica Pond area will depend on a favorable 
finding, following a study by the Chief of Engineers. Study was 
completed July 31, 1964, recommending construction, and 
approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 22, 1964. By 
letter dated November 5, 1964, the New York State Department 
of Public Works confirmed that title to all properties and interests 
in properties necessary for constructing the 11 groins was 
fully vested in Suffolk County. 
By letter dated December 7, 1964, the Department stated that 
the county had obtained easements or fee title for the parcels 
necessary for constructing the two groins. New York State 
Department of Public Works Furnished $884,600 and $830,330 
required contributed funds October 30, 1964, and September 7, 
1965, respectively, for construction of 11 groins in Moriches- 
Shinnecock reach and $439,900 on January 22, 1965, for construction 
of 2 groins in Georgica Pond area of the Southampton- 
Beach Hampton reach, The completed 2 groins and 11 groins 
were accepted by the New York State Department of Public 
Works for maintenance on May 11, 1966 and April 10, 1967 
respectively. 
On March 22, 1965, the State recommended that planning priority 
be in the order: Southampton-Beach Hampton (Drainage 
structures first): Shinnecock Inlet-Southampton; Beach 
Hampton-Montauk Point; and Fire Island-Moriches Inlet. Planning 
on the drainage structures was initiated but was suspended, 
based on: meeting of October 28, 1965 with Georgica Pond 
Association and the Preservation Society of East End wherein 
concern was indicated regarding the effects of the proposed 
drainage structure on ecology, salinity, pond level and aesthetic 
values; meeting with the Congressional representatives, State 
legislators, Federal agencies and local officials held on May 26, 
1966: and resolution of the Suffolk County Board of 
Supervisors adopted June 13, 1966 requesting advancement of 
the planning of the Fire Island-Moriches Inlet reach (Fire Island 
National Seashore). On June 16, 1967, the New York State 
Department of Public Works requested the following works 
undertaken as immediate priority items: in Moriches- 
Shinnecock reach, beach and dune. fill at 11 groin site, construction 
of four groins west of the completed 11 groins, beach and 
dune fill east of the 11 groins; in Southampton-Beach Hampton 
reach (at East Hampton), construction of two additional groins, 
and the outlet structure at Georgica Pond. On March 18, 1968 
the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution 
supporting construction of 4 groin in Reach 2 (Moriches- 
Shinnecock) and 2 groins in Reach 4 (Southampton-Beach 
Hampton). On April 22, 1968 the Board adopted a more inclusive 
resolution authorizing participation in beach erosion and 
hurricane protection for the Moriches-Shinnecock reach and in 
the Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton 
reach. 
On December 24, 1968, the Commissioner of the New York 
State Conservation Department executed the second supplement 
to the assurances of local cooperation, which was accepted 
by the District Engineer on January 24, 1969. The reaffirmed 
previous assurances contained provisions for constructing four 
additional groins in an area extending 6,000 feet west from the 
most westerly groin in the existing eleven-groin field in the 
Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach, and for placing 
beach and dune fill in this area to the full design cross section 
as defined in the authorized project report. A General Design 
Memo completed in 1980 recommended placement of sand fill 
in the existing 11 groin field and along 9,500 feet of shore to the 
west. 
Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design began 
November 1962 and the project construction commenced in 
January 1965. Two groins in Reach 4: Southampton-Beach 
Hampton, Section 3, were initiated in March, and completed in 
September 1965, at a total cost of $720,950 of which $382,109 
were incurred against required contributed funds. Eleven groins 
in Reach 2: Moriches-Shinnecock, Section 2, were initiated in 
January 1965, and completed in October 1966 at a total cost of 
$2,854,565 of which $1,370.191 were incurred against required 
contributed funds. Initial beach fill placement for 750,000 cubic 
yards in Reach 2. Section 1A was completed on May 23, 1969. 
On August 4, 1969 work started on 4 groins and sandfill in 
Reach 2, Section 1A and was completed November 14, 1970. 
3,083 tons of stone and 1,111,000 cubic yards of sand was 
placed. Total cost for all Section 1A was $3,663,455 including 
$1,791,428 required contributed funds. Planning for another 
increment of work at Westhampton Beach underway, Funds in 
the amount of $70,000 were allotted on April 14, 1977 for initiation 
of the Phase 1 study in Reach 1, Fire Island Inlet to 
Moriches Inlet. Environmental Impact Statement on entire project 
prepared. The Final Environmental Impact Statement was 
filed with Environmental Protection Agency on January 28, 
1978. On March 7, 1978 Department of the Interior supported 
by the other agencies referred the Environmental Impact 
Statement to Council on Environmental Quality as unacceptable. 
On June 6 1978 the Council agreed and recommended 
project reformulation. Subsequent to strong objections on the 
project's final Environmental Impact Statement, meetings were 
held in September 1978, January and July 1979 with Department 
of Interior, Environmental Protection Agency and other 
interested Federal agencies. Subsequently, the Federal agencies 
have agreed to a basis for the reformulation of the Fire Island to 
Montauk Point project including a general agreement on the 
studies necessary to answer the outstanding concerns. 
Public meetings were held in October 1979 in order to delineate 
the full scope and level of effort needed to reformulate the 
the project. A final scoping session was held January 17, 1980 
and agreement reached between the Federal agencies although 
New York State had strong objections. A plan of study was submitted 
in July 1980. Reformulation will result in a new General 
Design Memorandum. However, because of New York State's 
inability to financially participate in construction at West 
Hampton Beach, reformulation was postponed. 
2-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY 
Two recent breaches (new inlets) have occurred in the vulnerable 
Westhampton area during periods of storm tides, one in 
Jan. 1980, just east of the Moriches inlet, and the most recent in 
Dec. 1992, at the eastern end of Moriches Bay. Both breaches 
were filled in by contract, the last one completed in Sept. 1993. 
At present coordination is proceeding with the State to construct 
a project in FY '96 that would provide increased protection 
for the Westhampton area on an interim basis, while the entire 
project is reformulated. Sand fill would be provided to the existing 
groin field, and additional sand would be placed west of the 
groins to nourish the eroded beach and reestablish a dune area. 
20. ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT 
(CONEY ISLAND AREA), NY 
Location. Atlantic coast of New York City, in Brooklyn 
(Kings County), approximately nine miles south of the Battery, 
N.Y. City. 
Existing project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986. The authorized plan provides for beach 
erosion control by restoring the Coney Island public beach up 
to 250 feet beyond its historic shoreline; the extension of the 
westerly terminal groin; construction of a terminal groin at the 
easterly end of the restored beach, and a fillet of beachfill from 
the terminal groin at W. 37th St. extending approximately 2300 
ft. into the community of Sea Gate. The authorized plan also 
provides for restoration of the beach by periodic beach nourishment. 
Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the N.Y. State Dept. 
of Environmental Conservation. The local agreement has not 
been finalized, but the customary provisions are that local interests 
will; provide without cost to the United States all lands, 
easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas necessary 
for construction of the project, hold and save the United States 
free from claims for damages which may result from the construction 
works and subsequent maintenance of the project; provide 
a cash contribution toward the total first cost; assure that 
water pollution that would affect the health of bathers will not 
be permitted; assure continued conditions of public ownership 
and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation 
is based, during the economic life of the project; maintain 
public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms 
and maintain all improvements after completion in accordance 
with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, 
including periodic nourishment during the economic life of the 
project as may be required to serve the intended purpose, subject 
to Federal participation in the cost of periodic nourishment 
for the economic project life. 
Operations and results during period, and condition as of 
September 30. The General Design Memo was approved in '92. 
The record of decision for the EIS was signed in July '93. The 
Project Cooperation Agreement was signed by the State of New 
York in Oct. 1993. The construction contract was awarded in 
March 1994 and completed in Jan. 1995. 
21. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ 
Location. The northern portion of the Atlantic coast of New 
Jersey extending from Sandy Hook southerly to Bamegat Inlet 
- length about 48 miles. Erosion has seriously reduced the 
width of most beaches in the study area with consequent exposure 
of the shore to storm damage. Because of this erosion of 
the shore the area does not provide sufficient recreational 
beaches for the proper accommodation of the present and prospective 
tributary population. 
SECTION I - SEA BRIGHT TO 
OCEAN TOWNSHIP, NJ 
Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey 
in Monmouth County extending from Sea Bright southerly to 
Ocean Township - length about 12 miles. Sea Bright is about 
30 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. 
Authorized project. The Water Resources Development Act 
of 1988 (PL 100-670 authorized a plan substantially in accordance 
with the plan recommended in the General Design Memorandum 
for the project dated May, 1988. In general the plan 
provides for beach erosion control along approximately 12 
miles of coastline, extending from Sea Bright southward to 
Ocean Township, New Jersey, by artificial placement of sand to 
widen the beach berm to 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above 
mean low water with an additional 2 foot high berm cap to provide 
an extra increment of protection from overtopping. The 
project also provides for the notching of 15 groins, and periodic 
nourishment throughout the 50 year economic life of the project. 
Total estimated Federal cost for Section I is $665,900,000. 
Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local 
cooperation is $358,600,000. 
Local cooperation. Includes reconstruction of sea wall at 
Sea Bright and all lands easements, rights of way and drainage 
outfall extensions. 
Operations and results during period and condition as of 
September 30. The Local Cooperation Agreement has been 
signed by the State of New Jersey. Work under Contract 1A 
continued with completion set for Nov. 1995. Work under 
Contract lB was initiated in June 1995. 
SECTION II- ASBURY PARK TO 
MANASQUAN, NJ 
Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in 
Monmouth County extending from Asbury Park southerly to 
Manasquan - length about 9 miles. 
Recommended project. Provides for Federal participation in 
the restoration and protection of the shore from Asbury Park to 
Manasquan by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach 
to a minimum width of 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above 
mean low water. The project provides for Federal participation 
2-12 
ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
in periodic nourishment costs for a period of 50 years from the 
year that the total quantity to fill placed has equalled that 
required to restore the beach to project dimensions. Total estimated 
Federal cost is $425,000,000. 
Operations and results during period and condition as of 
September 30. The project is in active planning status. Plans 
and specs were initiated for initial construction of the Southern 
Reach. A final General Design Memo was approved in Jan. 1995. 
22. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH 
EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Table 2-H at end of chapter). 
23. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 
WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 
Publ. Law 826, 84th congress as amended (See Table 2-0 at end 
of chapter). 
FLOOD CONTROL 
24. NORTH ELLENVILLE, NY 
Location. In Ellenville, N.Y., on Beer Kill and Fantine Kill, 
at their confluence with Sandburg Creek, which discharges into 
Rondout Creek at Napanoch, N.Y., about 2 miles downstream 
from Ellenville. (See Geological Survey, Ellenville quadrangle). 
Existing project. Improvement includes construction of levees 
and floodwalls along Beer Kill and Fantine Kill-I capping 
retaining walls along Beer Kill; removing concrete dam, channel 
improvements and stream diversion on Fantine Kill; providing 
interior drainage including diversion ditches drainage structures, 
ponding areas; alteration of 6 bridges: and relocating 
structures and utilities. The project was completed in 1975. 
Since that time severe storms in March 1980 and April 1987 
caused erosion of the riprap bank protection and significant 
damage to the project floodwalls and levees, Subsequent repairs 
to damaged areas were undertaken in 1981-82 and in 1987-88 
under PL-84-99 authority. A Design Deficiency Report has 
been prepared and submitted to Office of Chief of Engineers. 
The recommended plan for design deficiency correction involves 
repair, reinforcement, and replacement of undermined 
floodwalls, placement of riprap protection along the Beer Kill 
Channel bottom and toes of banks; repair and replacement of 
riprap along the side slopes and toes of the levees, and possible 
removal of a rock outcrop to reduce erosive velocities. The current 
Federal cost estimate is $6,1 00,000 (Oct. 94-P.L.) 
Local cooperation. Assurances of Local Cooperation were 
received from the New York State Department of Environmental 
Conservation in 1968 and 1970. An additional Local Cooperation 
Agreement was signed in November 1987 to cover the 
repairs accomplished through the PL-84-99 effort. In a letter 
dated 9 November 1990, the New York State Department of 
Environmental Conservation indicated their willingness to participate 
and act as local sponsor under the terms of Section 414 
of the 1990 Water Resources Development Act (the non Federal 
share of the cost to correct the deficiency will be the same as at 
the time the project was authorized and constructed). The 
Project Cooperation Agency (PCA) was executed in Jan. 1995. 
Operation and results during period, and condition as of 
Sept. 30. The Plans and Specs have been approved. A construction 
contract was awarded june 30, 1995, and construction 
was initiated in Sept. 1995. 
25. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, NJ & NY 
Location. The Passaic Basin, comprising 787 square miles in 
northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles in southern New 
York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan 
area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape 
26 miles long and 56 miles wide - and contains portions or 
Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and 
Union Counties in New Jersey. The Basin also includes parts of 
Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. 
Previous projects. Three Federal flood control projects have 
been completed by the Corps of Engineers in the Passaic River 
Basin. A $67,400 desnagging, debris removal, and channel 
restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook 
and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton 
River in Pequannock Township, NJ. 
Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including 
shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in 
the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western 
Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake 
Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne 
Township and Lincoln Park Borough, NJ, was completed in 
1954 at a cost of $50,000. 
A $1.5 million basin-wide project to improve the Flood 
Warning and Preparedness System was completed in 1988. 
The project was implemented by the Corps of Engineers in conjunction 
with the National Weather Service and U.S. Geological 
Survey, the State of New Jersey is the non-Federal sponsor of 
the project. 
Project history. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers involvement 
in Passaic River planning was first authorized in the 
Flood Control Acts of 1936. Since then, reports recommending 
plans of action were issued in 1939, 1948, 1962, 1972, and 
1973. None of these plans were implemented because they did 
not receive widespread public support. In 1976, Congress 
authorized a Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Study 
in Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1976. Congressional Guidance on the conduct of the study was 
2-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
provided in House Report 94-1702. Local protection plans 
were completed for tributary flood damage areas along the 
Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers at Mahwah, N.J., and Suffern, 
N.Y., Molly Ann's Brook at Haledon, Prospect Park and 
Paterson, N.J., the Ramapo River at Oakland, N.J., and the 
Lower Saddle River in Bergen County, N.J. These projects 
were authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986. 
In April 1984, the Passaic Basin experienced flooding estimated 
to be the worst in 40 years. In June 1984, the State 
of New Jersey selected a dual inlet diversion tunnel plan as 
the preferred Basin-wide alternative for detailed plan formulation. 
The Phase I General Design Memorandum and draft 
Environmental Impact Statement, (EIS), recommending the 
Pompton River/Passaic Dual Inlet Tunnel Diversion Plan, 
were completed during FY 1988. The final EIS was filed 
with EPA in December 1988. 
Section 101 (a) 18 of the Water Resources Development 
Act (WRDA) 1990 (PL 101-640), as modified by section 
102 (p) of WRDA '92 (PL 102-580) authorizes construction 
of the Passaic River Flood Protection Project for the Passaic 
River Basin which will address both environmental and engineering 
objectives of the Act. The Passaic River Flood 
Protection Project combines diversion tunnels, levees, flood 
walls, channel modification, and natural flood storage to provide 
flood protection to about 35 towns in the Passaic River 
Basin. 
Condition as of September 30. Preconstruction Engineering 
and Design for the Passaic River Flood Protection 
Project was initiated in FY 1989 and is continuing with 
preparation of a General Design Memorandum and 
Supplemental Environmental Impart Statement with accompanying 
project cost estimate, and update of buy-out plans. 
A draft report was completed in Sept. 1995. Engineering and 
design for the Joseph G. Minish Passaic River Waterfront 
Park and Historic Area project element, Consisting of environmental 
and streambank restoration measures in the city of 
Newark, is also ongoing. 
26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Inspections of the following completed flood control 
works and beach erosion and hurricane protection projects 
were performed to determine the extent of compliance by 
local interests with operation and maintenance requirements. 
New England 
Adams, MA - Hoosic River 
Bennington, VT - Roaring Branch, 
Walloomsac River 
East Barre Dam, VT - Jail Branch 
Winooski River 
Inspection Date 
Sept. 95 
Sept. 95 
Oct. 94 
Montpelier Dam, VT - Winooski River 
North Adams, MA - Hoosic River 
Richford, VT - Missiquoi River 
Waterbury Dam, VT - Little River 
Wrightsville Dam, VT - North Branch, 
Winooski River 
NY - NJ Areas 
* E. Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet 
Elizabeth , NJ - Elizabeth River 
* Fire Is. Inlet to Montauk Pt., NY 
Herkimer, NY - Bellinger Brook & Mohawk River 
Holland Patent, NY - Thompson Creek 
Hoosic Falls, NY - Hoosic River 
Kingston, NY - Esopus Creek 
North Ellenville, NY - Beer & Fantine Kills 
& Sandburg Creek 
Rahway, NJ - Rahway River 
* Raritan Bay & Sandy Hook Bay, NJ 
Old Bridge, Keansburg & Middletown, NJ - 
Rosendale, NY - Roundout Creek 
So. Amsterdam, NY - So. Chuctanunda Creek 
& Mohawk River 
So. Orange NJ - E. Branch, Rahway River 
Yonkers, NY - Saw Mill River 
Chappaqua, NY - Saw Mill River 
Ardsley, NY 
Oct. 94 
Sept. 95 
Sept. 95 
Oct. 94 
Oct. 94 
Oct. 94 
May 95 
Oct. 94 
Oct. 94 
Oct. 94 
Oct. 94 
Oct. 94 
Oct. 94 
May 95 
May 95 
Oct. 94 
Oct. 94 
May 95 
Nov. 94 
Nov. 94 
Nov. 94 
* Beach Erosion & Hurricane Protection Projects 
27. OTHER AUTHORIZED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Table 2-1 at end of chapter.) 
28. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 
858, 80th Cong. as amended (Pre-authorization) (See Table 2-P 
at end of chapter). 
Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities. 
Pursuant to Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation provides 
for disaster preparedness, emergency operation, rehabilitation, 
advance measures, emergency water, and drought assistance. 
Under disaster preparedness, the New York District initiated 
revisions to emergency response plans to include lessons from 
Hurricane Andrew, conducted exercises, attented meetings and 
seminars dealing with emergency response plan and purchased 
supplies and equipment to maintain its' flood fight and 
response capability. 
2-14

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
Under emergency operations, the New York District conducted 
field investigations, provided technical assistance and sandbags 
to local and county government in response to flooding events. 
GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
29. SURVEYS 
(See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 
30. COLLECTION AND STUDY 
OF BASIC DATA 
Costs for the period of $73,362 for flood plain management 
services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. 
31. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
Projects having all, or inactive or uncompleted portions deauthorized 
by Congressional Action pursuant to Water Resources 
Development Acts (See-Table 2-M at end of chapter.) 
2-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
Total Cost to 
Projects Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY94 FY 95 September 30, 1995 
1. Aquatic Plant 
Control 
2 Brown's Creek, N.Y. 
3. East Rockaway Inlet, 
N.Y. 
4. Fire Island to 
Jones Inlet, N.Y. 
5. Hudson River, N.Y. 
6. Kill Van Kull-Newark 
Bay, N.J. & N.Y. 
7. Lake Montauk 
Harbor, N.Y. 
8. Mattituck Harbor, 
N.Y. 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Appro. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
20,000 
14,007 
24,000 
38,938 
55,000 
79,583 
220,000 
14,822 
105,000 294,000 
101,357 297,314 
358,003 
357,062 
125,000 
336,775 
250,000 
215,585 
5,404,000 
5,404,575 
2,184,806 1 
1,942,408 2 
33,976 16 
33,976 
1,072,529 
1,072,040 
83.969 4 
533,334 
2,360,000 463,000 13,478,560 
2,377,520 479,000 13,476,714 
-7,810,000 17,274,360 15 
-152,678 7,964,371 17,446,412 
1,420,103 2,710,000 1,420,000 17,000 
1,414,825 2,715,271 1,414,734 22,229 
20,927,050 
20,993,738 
44,249,800 6, 7 
44,249,865 
3,926,911 2,057,000 1,367,000 1,902,000 51,879,450 8,9 
3,922,485 2,050,837 1,371,344 1,884,264 51,745,074 
51,139,000 32,549,000 10,173,000 5,452,000 195,023,000 
56,699,017 24,656,202 12,719,100 9,712,818 193,546,518 
70,000 
76,895 
100,000 
99,940 
65,000 
65,000 
100,000 730,000 
96,850 732,290 
80,000 
69,337 
791,680 
791,680 3 
2,218,380 
2,217,243 
177,925 
177,925 17 
1,000,000 2,590,130 
1,107,724 2,559,743 
2-16 
TABLE 2-A

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
Total Cost to 
Projects Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY94 FY 95 September 30, 1995 
9. Narrows of Lake 
Champlain, N.Y. 
10. New York Harbor-- 
Collection and 
Removal of Drift 
11. New York Harbor- 
Entrance Channels & 
Anchorage Areas 
12. Shinnecock Inlet, 
N.Y. 
13. Shrewsbury River, 
N.J. 
14. Supervisor of New 
York Harbor 
18 East Rockaway Inlet 
to Rockaway Inlet 
and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. 
19. Fire Island Inlet 
to Montauk Point, NY 
20. Rockaway Inlet to 
Norton Point (Coney 
Island), N.Y. 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
40,002 
40,002 
41,000 
37,432 
42,000 
45,521 
44,000 
42,601 
681,811 o 
681,811 
1,469,090 
1,407,615 
2,200,000 2,800,000 6,400,000 249,000 55,104,000 
1,236,350 1,721,084 2,817,399 2,038,476 39,351,174 
4,564,788 4,199,100 4,470,000 4,450,000 89,350,250 13 
4,542,752 4,217,727 4,395,988 4,512,698 89,602,245 
45,009,710 
- - - - 45,009,710 14 
3,520,856 6,152,000 4,855,000 6,525,000 79,319,170 
3,499,950 6,115,320 4,704,733 6,676,873 82,091,931 
3,537,000 4,800,000 1,300,000 
1,742,111 6,528,484 2,727,479 
550,000 
545,596 
-300,000 
-299,950 
822,457 
814,078 
290,000 
422,212 
145,412 
750,000 
474,996 
780,000 
784,402 
83,000 
82,155 
30,000 
23,788 
760,000 
768,380 
344,070 
343,831 
927,948 
68,000 
68,763 
190,000 
194,243 
15,117,000 
14,998,241 
1,481,000 
1,480,911 
1,145,457 
1,145,457 
18 
5,434,342 
5,433,284 19 
770,000 703,000 34,330,960 
769,249 701,873 34,808,832 
2,805,000 3,897,000 32,645,420 
466,075 1,741,909 27,933,360 
6,483,000 2,200,000 2,946,000 21,660,000 
2,927,439 4,567,001 3.325,814 24,532,750 12 
113,970 
143,753 
100,000 
304,675 
6,744,000 3,075,000 13,210,000 
902,836 6,220,317 10,271,534 
2-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
Total Cost to 
Projects Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY94 FY 95 September 30, 1995 
21. Sandy Hook to 
Bamegat Inlet, N.J. 
24. North Ellenville. 
N. Y. 
25. Passaic River, N.J. 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work. 
Aprop. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
2,000,000 100,000 29,100,000 1,016,000 43,318,000 
1,042,781 1,021,129 12,455,999 11,600,136 36,574,137 
270,000 
197,900 
200,000 
286,977 
7,145,000 10,005,000 17,000,000 
7,497,720 5,036,497 9,167,374 
600,000 -105,000 5,461,450 
148,433 182,844 5,148,474 
9,255,384 
63,686,700 
59,139,645 
1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 
2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 
3. Excludes $104,805 for new work from contributed funds. 
4. Excludes $ 100,000 for new work expended from contributed 
funds and includes $82,600 for new work 
expended from public work fund. 
6. Includes $5,112,694 for new work for previous project. 
7. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public 
works funds and $311,461 emergency relief funds. Excludes 
$81,373 expended from contributed funds. 
8. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18, 1915 
and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and 
dam at Troy, N.Y., under permanent indefinite appropriation. 
Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to 
Troy Lock. 
9. Includes $346,797 for maintenance for previous project. 
10. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 
12. Includes $3,788,340 contributed funds. 
13. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction 
of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in 
maintenance funds and $997,813 in 0 & M funds.) 
14. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized 
by acts prior to adoption of existing projects. 
15. Excludes $90,190 for new work expended from 
contributed funds. Additional NY State funds were 
$200,000 in 1990 and $581,000 in 1991. 
16. Includes $200,000 Jobs Bill funds. 
17. Excludes $34,580 from cntributed funds. 
18. Includes $220,894 for new work for previous projects. 
19. Includes $286,600 for maintenance for previous projects. 
2-18 
TABLE 2-A

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Act Work Authorized Document 
River and Harbor 
Act of 1959 
Section 104 and Harbor 
Act of 1958 
Section 302 River and 
Harbor act of 1965 
Sept. 19, 1980 
July 3, 1930 
August 26, 1937 
May 17,1950 
AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) 
Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious 
Aquatic Plant growths 
Provided that all research and planning cost to be borne fully by 
the United States 
Modified project to include control of waterchestnut 
BROWN'S CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) 
6 foot channel for 1,850 feet and 4 feet 
for 1,350 feet and 2 jetties 
EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) 
Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and a jetty. 
FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) 
construction of jetty. 
H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 
Ist sess. 
H. Ex Doc. 22, 51st Cong. 
2nd sess. 
H. Doc 19, 71st Cong., 1st sess. 
Rivers & Harbors Committee 
Doc. 33, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 
Channel 10 feet deep. H. Doc. 762, 80th Cong., 
2nd sess. 
1958 River & Harbor Act 
1962 River & Harbor Act 
March 1988 
June 25, 19 1 0 
March 3, 1925 
July 3, 1930 
July 1, 1935 
August 30, 1935 
June 20, 1938 
September 3, 1954 
P.L. 89-72 
Three dredging operations with sand serving as nourishment to the 
beaches westerly of the inlet 
Extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir, a navigation channel 
and dikes, sand deposit on westerly beaches 
14 foot channel with sand placed along Gilgo Beach 
HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) 
Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State 
lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam. 
Channel 27 feet deep from Hudson to Albany, NY 
Channel 27 feet below Hudson. 
Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project. 
Relocation of 12 foot channel between Troy and Waterford. 
Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with 
no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany & Troy. 
Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet 
and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. 
Mooring facilities 
Note: The 12 and 27 foot classification have been deauthorized. 
H. Doc. 411, 84th Cong., 
2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 115, 89th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 
2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 350, 68st Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., 
1st sess. 
S. Doc. 155, 72th Cong., 
2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong., 
3rd sess. 
H. Doc. 228, 83rd Cong., 
1st sess. 
2-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Work Authorized Document 
FY 1985 Supplemental 
Appropriations Act. 
(PL99-98) 
March 2, 1945 
June 3, 1896 
August 30, 1935 
August 11, 1964 
August 8, 1917 
March 14, 1915 
July 3, 1930 
December 31, 1970 
March 7, 1974 
July 5, 1884 
March 3, 1899 
June 25, 1910 
August 8, 1917 
KILL VAN KULL-NEWARK BAY, N.J. & N.Y. 
(See Section 6 of Text) 
Deepening existing 35 foot channels in increments to 40 feet and 
then 44 feet. 
LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) 
Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, 10 foot boat basin: repair 
and extension of two jetties; and addition of sport fishing facilities 
on top of jetties. 
MATTITUCK, N.Y. (See Section 8 of Text) 
Dredging 7 foot channel and 2 riprap jetties 
250 foot extension of west jetty. 
Dredging anchorage area and deepening channel at upper end. 
NARROWS OF, LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VERMONT 
(See Section 9 of Text) 
Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide. 
NEW YORK HARBOR COLLECTION AND REMOVAL 
OF DRIFT (See Section 10 of Text) 
Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and 
its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal 
of drift in these waterways. 
Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. 
Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal of 
derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris 
along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all 
subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. 
Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore 
Structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore 
Structures. 
NEW YORK HARBOR, ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND 
ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 11 of Text) 
Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feet deep for width of 1,000 feet 
(Dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, December 27, 1886 by 
authority of Act of August 5, 1886). 
Ambrose Channel (East Channel). 
Maintenance of entrance channel under I head. 
Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay. 
H. Doc. 369, 76th Cong., 
1 st sess. 
Annual Report, 1891, p. 843 
H. Doc. 8, 71st Cong. 
1st sess. 
Chief of Engineers 
pursuant to Sec. 107, 
Public Law 86-645 
H. Doc. 1387, 62nd Cong., 
3rd sess. 
P.L. 91-611, 91 st Cong., 
H.R. 1987 
P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong. 
Annual Reports 1887 p. 62 
and 1888, p. 63 
H. Doc- 159, 55th Cong., 
2nd sess. 
H. Doc- 518, 63rd Cong., 
2nd sess. 
2-20 
TABLE 2-B 
Act

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
August 8. 1917 
August 8, 1917 
August 30, 1935 
August 30, 1935 
August 26, 1937 
Removal of Craven Shoal 
Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands 
Dredging south end of Red Hook Flats, Liberty Island Anchorage, 
and channel along New Jersey pierhead line. 
Deepen Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet. 
H. Doc. 557, 64th Cong., 
1 st sess. 
H. Doc. 625, 64th Cong 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 183, 73rd Cong., 
2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong. 
1st sess. 
Deepen Ambrose and Anchorage Channels to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet. Senate Commerce Doc. 
75th Cong, 1st sess. 
July 3, 1958 
October 27, 1965 
March 31, 1982 
July 14, 1960 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Aug. 30, 1975 
Aug. 30, 1935 
May 17, 1950 
1974 & 1986 Water 
Resources Development Acts 
1960 River & Harbor Act 
1974 Water Resources 
Development Act 
Dredging South Channel, Elimination of portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel 
Deepen and expand Red Hook Flats Anchorage. Deepen Gravesend 
Bay Anchorage 
Further expansion of Red Hook Flats Anchorage and the relocation of 
Anchorage channel. 
SHINNECOCK INLET, N.Y. (See Section 12 of Text) 
Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide in Inlet, and 6 feet deep 
and I 00 feet wide in the Bay, and 2 jetties. 
SHREWSBURY RIVER, N.J. (See Section 13 of Text) 
Channel 6 feet deep in North Branch. 
Channel 12 feet deep. 
Channel 9 feet deep. 
Turning basin and anchorage 6 feet at Red Bank. 
EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND 
JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (See Section 18 of Text) 
Beach nourishment of 100 to 200 foot wide beach at elevation 10 feet MSL 
FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, N.Y 
(See Section 19 of Text) 
Raising dunes, widening beaches, interior drainage structures, groins 
beach replenishment, annual nourishment. 
Project modified to provide that non-Federal interst shall contribute 
30 percent of first costs. 
S. Doc. 45, 84th Cong. 
1st sess. 
S. Doc. 17, 89th Cong. 
1st sess. 
OCE Letter 31 Mar. 1982. 
H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., 
1st sess. 
FY 83 Supplemental 
Appropriations Act 
H. Doc. 1296, 62nd Cong. 
3rd sess. 
H. Doc. 157, 71st Cong., 
2nd sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 31, 74th Cong., 
H. Doc. 285, 81st Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 425 
86th Cong., 2nd sess. 
P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., 
H.R. 10203 
1986 and 1992 Water 
Resources Development Acts 
2-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Act Work Authorized Document 
1986 Water Resources 
Development Act 
Section 501 
July 3. 1958 
1988 Water Resources 
Development Act 
1962 Flood Control Act 
1990 Water Resources 
Development Act 
1976 and 1990 Water 
Resourse Development 
Acts 
TABLE 2-C 
ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND) N.Y. 
(See Section 20 of Text) 
Provide beach fill to public beach to furnish storm damage 
protection to the area. 
Extension of terminal groins at W. 37 St. and Brighton Beach 
Fillet of beach fill at Sea Gate. 
SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. 
(See Section 21 of Text) 
Restoration of beach to minimum width of 100 feet at height of 
10 feet above mlw, and construction of 23 new groins and 
extension of 14 existing groins. 
NORTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. (See Section 24 of Text) 
Levees and floodwalls, removing concrete dam, stream diversion, 
interior drainage structures. Subsequent damage repairs. 
PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. 
(See Section. 25 of Text) 
Advanced engineering and design study, involving reformulation 
of plans for flood control and water resource management. 
H. Doc..332, 85th Cong., 
2nd sess. modified by Appr. 
Act for Energy & Water Dev. 
for FY 85 
S. Doc. 113, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
PL-84-99 
H. Rpt. 94 -1702 
HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. 
FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT 
(Section 5 of Text) 
Location: 
Below Waterford 
Above Battery, New York City 
Locks: 
Clear Width 
Greatest length available for full width 
Lift at lowest stages 
Depth on miter sills: 
Upper (at normal pool level) 
Lower (at lowest low water) 
Character of foundation: Rock 
Kind of dam: Fixed Crest 
Type of construction: Concrete 
Complete: 1917 
Cost $1,463,014 
2-22 
2.2 miles 
152.6 miles 
44.4 feet 
492.5 feet 
17.3 feet 
16.3 feet 
13.0 feet

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
TABLE 2-E SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR 
(Section 14 of Text) 
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES-FY 1995 
1. Number of Patrols 
a. Shore 75 
b. Vessel 180 
c. Air (helicopter) 0 
255 
2. Number of Inspections 
a. Shore Facilities 133 
b. Vessels 196 
329 
3. Disposition of Cases 
a. Voluntary Restoration 41 
b. After-the-fact Permit Applications Accepted 17 
c. Permit not required or already under permit 53 
d. Submitted for litigation to OCE or US Attorney 0 
e. Other misc. 53 
f. Cases pending as of October 1, 1995 138 
302 
TABLE 2-F RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 1995 
NAME OF PROJECT DATE SURVEY CONDUCTED 
NEW JERSEY 
K eyport H arbor ............................ .......................................... ....................................................................... Jan. 95 
Newark Bay Hackensack & Passaic River..... ........................................ Mar. 95 
Raritan River ........... .. ................... ..... ................................................... ................................... Dec. 94 
Raritan River to Arthur Kill-Cut Off Chnl ..................................................................................................... Nov. 94 
Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek ......................................... Jan. 95 
Shrewsbury River ....................... ..................... .......................................... Apr. 95 
NEW YORK 
Browns Creek..............................................................................................................Nov. 94 
Buttermilk Channel ..................................... .. .............. ........ .......... .................................... Jun. 95 
Coney Island Channel ........................................................................................................................... Nov. 94 
East Rockaway Inlet ........................... ..... ...................................................................................... M ar 95 
Flushing Bay & Creek ............................. ... ...................................................... ............................... Jan. 95 
Great South Bay ........................ ..... . .. ................... .............................. ......... ...... ......................... Nov. 94 
Jam aica B ay ......................... .. . ............... ........ ............................... . .. . .......................... M ay 95 
Jones Inlet .................................................................... Apr 95 
Long Island Intracoastal W /W ......................... ........ ............... ...... ......... ......................... Nov. 94 
Portchester Harbor............................ .... ........ ........ ...... ................... Oct. 94 
Shinnecock Inlet..................................Sept. 95 
W estchester C reek ............................................... ................................... ............. .... ............................ O ct. 94 
Total cost of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys in Fiscal Year 1995 was $1,551,987. 
2-23

TABLE 2-G 
REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
Cost to Sept 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual 
Projects Report For 
Bay Ridge-Red Hook Channels, NY 
Buttermilk Channel, NY 
Bronx River, NY 
Burlington Harbor, VT 
Channel between North & South Hero Islands, VT. 
Cheesequake Creek, NJ 
Coney Island Channel, NY 
East Chester Creek, NY 
East River, NY 
Echo Bay Harbor, NY 
Flushing Bay and Creek, NY 
Glen Cove Creek, NY 
Gordon's Landing, VT 
Gowanus Creek Channel, NY 
Great Chazy River, NY 
Great Kills Harbor, NY 
Great Lakes to Hudson River W/W, N.Y. 
Great South Bay, NY 
Greenport Harbor, NY 
Harlem River, NY 
Hempstead Harbor, NY 
Huntington Harbor, NY 
Jamaica Bay, NY 
Jones Inlet, NY 
Keyport Hatbor, NJ 
Larchmont Harbor, NY 
Little Neck Bay, NY 
Long Island Intracoastal W/Way, NY 
Mamaroreck Harbor, NY 
Matawan Creek, NJ 
Milton Harbor, NY 
Moriches Inlet, N.Y. 
Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, N.J. 
Newtown Creek, N.Y. 
New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y. 
New York & New Jersey Channels 
Northport Harbor, N.Y. 
Peconic River, N.Y. 
Peckskill Harbor, N.Y. 
Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y. 
Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. 
Port Henry Harbor, N.Y. 
Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. 
Raritan River, NJ 
Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cut-Off Channel, N.J. 
Rondout Harbor NY 
Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y. 
1992 
1990 
1991 
1966 
1909 
1953 
1973 
1992 
1991 
1953 
1992 
1986 
1982 
1972 
1980 
1962 
1976 
1993 
1953 
1969 
1993 
1953 
1994 
1994 
1990 
1970 
1969 
1994 
1990 
1984 
1993 
1990 
1989 
1986 
1971 
1993 
1956 
1953 
1951 
1986 
1990 
1931 
1977 
1991 
1991 
1989 
1895 
$5,523,297 41,200,035 
45,590,201 3 5,332,36q 
1,149,946 12 3,947,500 
706,414 9 327,063 
31,000 1,288 
40,000 674,744 
111,371 423,148 
592,056 3,298,615 
32,723,662 13 6,197,968 
64,584 21,571 
2,102,905 7,673,802 
29,760 257,651 
34,750 115 
346,831 394,004 
18,000 292,919 
137,301 1 88,029 
33,562,640 20 457 
266,887 2,903,694 
74,681 21,720 
3,616,119 493,491 
3,687,949 76,497 
91,081 17 57,527 
4,545,750 10,293,035 
1,822,530 4 18,274,577 
40,475 1,464,947 
76,065 267,768 
1,741,210 19 537 
235,964 11,875,588 
513,764 1,351,086 
21,000 362,816 
151,373 2,167,294 
7,730,886 101,840 
29,014,500 2 25,771,367 
1,168,354 11,760,745 16 
73,214 8 212,411 
73,052,435 23 49,979,383 
78,644 615,487 
25,000 116,500 
19,400 66,037 
198,415 256,415 
433,479 6 2,025,097 
69,406 25 1,299 
221,128 31 359,294 
1,551,470 16,498,899 
810,500 3,965,631 
142,437 3,235,205 
98,468 249 
2-24 
Construction 
Operation & 
Maintenance

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
Cost to Sept 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation & 
Projects Report For Construction Maintenance 
Sag Harbor, N.Y. 
Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. 
Sandy Hook Bay @ Leonardo, N.J. 
St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, VT 
Saugerties Harbor, N.Y. 
Shark River, N.J. 
Sheepshead Bay. N.Y. 
Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, N.J. 
Staten Island.Rapid Transit Railway Bridge, Arthur Kill, N.Y. 
Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y. 
Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y. 
Wallabout Channel, N.Y. 
Wappinger Creek, N.Y. 
Washington Canal and South River, NJ 
Westchester Creek, NY 
Woodbridge Creek, N.J. 
1964 
1985 
1991 
1917 
1988 
1987 
1948 
1990 
1973 
1895 
1994 
1953 
1950 
1953 
1992 
1953 
121,805 26 
508,936 
56,479 
3,125 
81,905 18 
150,000 
33,828 
124,572 7 
7,730,476 
7,000 
69,836 
18,174 
13,000 
206,116 30o 
175,933 
48,823 
11,710 
4,002,330 
679,916 
385 
429,180 
1,439,039 
64,078 
2,047,731 10 
1,381,199 
36,312 
44,691 
212,827 
5,354,252 
178,398 
1. Excludes $104,800 for new work expended from contributed 
funds. 
2. Includes $1,836,400 for new work for previous projects. 
Excludes $285,600 expended from contributed funds. 
3. Includes $496,250 for new work for previous projects and 
$122,051 from public works funds. 
4. Excludes $1,822,530 for new work expended from contributed 
funds. 
6. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 
7. Includes $17,000 for new work for previous projects. 
8. Includes $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 
9. Includes cost of maintenance prior to July 1, 1886. Excludes 
$1,415,133 for rehabilitation. 
10. Includes $169,700 for maintenance for previous projects. 
12. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance 
for previous projects. Excludes $10,000 for new 
work expended from contributed funds. 
13. Includes $6,197,690 for new work and $37,664 for maintenance 
for previous projects. 
16. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenance for previous projects. 
17. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed 
funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 
19. Excludes $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed 
funds. 
20. Included $4,456,400 for new work expended from emergency 
relief funds. 
23. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed 
funds. 
25. Excludes $1,000 for new work expended from contributed 
funds. 
26. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 
28. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 
30. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. 
31. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance 
$20,646 for previous projects. 
2-25

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 2-H OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
Cost to Sept 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation & 
Projects Report For Construction Maintenance 
Atlantic.Coast of N.J., Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet I 
Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. 
Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. 2 
1959 
1981 
1981 
$11,061,256 
18,044,667 
262 
217,900 
1. Reactivated as a modified project in 1985 (Sec. 21) 
2. Listed since 1982 as a navigation and beach nourishment project (Sec. 4) 
OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Cost to Sept 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual 
Projects Report For 
Adams, Hossic River Basin, Mass. 1 
Ardsley, N.Y. 
Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn. 1,3 
East Barre Dam, Winooski River, Vt. I 
Elizabeth, N.J. 
Herkimer, N.Y. 
Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin. N.Y. I 
Lamoille River, Vt.: Hardwich Dams 5, 6 
Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, N.J. 
Missisquoi River at Richford, Vtl 3 
North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. 
Rahway. N.J. 
Rahway. South Branch, N.J. 
Rosendale, N.Y. 
Sandburg, Creek. Spring Glen, N.Y. 
Sawmill R. Elmsford & Greenburgh. N.Y. 
South Amsterdam, Mohawk River. N.Y. 
South Ellenville. N.Y. 
South Orange, N.J. 
Staten Island. N.Y. 
Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y. 1-3 
Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, Vt. 
Winooski River. Vt. 
Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. 
Yonkers, N.Y. 
1. Completed. 
2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. 
3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, 
Public Law 858, 80th Cong. as amended. 
4. Inactive. 
1964 
1990 
1959 
1963 
1985 
1973 
1956 
1939 
1990 
1965 
1968 
1971 
1979 
1975 
1976 
1987 
1967 
1984 
1981 
1983 
1959 
1976 
1940 
1970 
1984 
Construction 
6,282,307 2 
5,447,281 
363,515 
2,898,334 
54,374,070 
1,249,530 9 
1,064,626 
17,888,670 
238,169 
15,572,988 7 
973,142 8 
15,863,723 
3,684,966 
109,702 
62,917 
1,564,976 
289,702 
6,857,484 
644,998 
142,075 
1,438,845 
5,897,427 
1,549,929 
113,754,475 10 
Operation & 
Maintenance 
8,200 
5. Includes $213,507 emergency relief funds. 
7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 
8. 
9. 
10. 
Excludes cost of $51,500 under other contributed funds. 
Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized. 
Includes $622,817 contributed funds. 
2-26 
TABLE 2-I

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
TABLE 2-J SURVEYS 
Study Class 
Navigation Studies 
Flood Control Studies 
Beach Erosion Studies 
Special Studies : 
TOTAL 
1. Includes special investigations, FERC licensing activities, Intra Army water resources, Nat'l Estuary studies, Marine Fisheries Service, 
Planning Ass't to States, Coord. studies of other agencies. 
PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
Authorized Projects 
Navigation 
Arthur Kill Channel - Howland Hook Terminal, NY & NJ 
Claremont Terminal Channel, NJ 
Port Jersey Channel, NJ 
Flood Control 
Green Brook Sub-Basin, NJ 
Lower Saddle River, NJ 
Ramapo River at Oakland, NJ 
FY 95 Cost 
$166,880 
221,630 
345,120 
$4,195,540 
645,940 
540,290 
COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES 
Study Class 
Flood Plain Technical Services 
Flood Plain Management Unit 
TOTAL 
FY 95 Cost 
$50,356 
23,016 
73,372 
2-27 
FY 95 Cost 
$913,586 
390,695 
2,784,502 
192,977 
4,281,760 
TABLE 2-K 
TABLE 2-L - -- --

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual 
Projects Report For 
Date 
And 
Authority 
Federal 
Funds 
Expended Construction 
Operation 
and 
Maintenance 
Bennington, VT (1936 & 41 Acts) 
Bronx River, N.Y. 
Brown's Creek, N.Y. 
Cheesequake Creek, N.J. 4 
Coney Island Creek, N.Y. 4-6 
East Chester Creek, N.Y. (1950 Act) 
East Rockaway (Debs) Inlet, N.Y. 4 
East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet 
and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part 11) 
Elizabeth, N.J. 
Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. 
Hempstead Harbor, NY (68-Act) 14 
Hudson River, NYC to Albany (12 Ft, 27 Ft)18 
Huntington Harbor, N.Y. 
Irvington Harbor, N.Y. 
Lamoille River, VT 
Lemon Creek, NY 
Manhasset Bay, NY 
Matawan Creek, NJ (1881 Act) 
N. Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, NY 
Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic 
River, N.J. 16 
N.Y. & N.J. Channels 4, 18 
Orowoc Creek, NY. 
Otter Creek, VT 
Perth Amboy, N.J. 
Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. 2, 3 
Port Jefferson Hbr. N.Y. (1890, 1930 & 68 Acts) 
Rahway River, N.J. 6, 7 
Raritan River, N.J. 4, 6 
Rome Mohawk River, N.Y. 6, 7 
Rutland, Otter Creek, VT 
Sag Harbor, N.Y. (Channel) 1 
Shooters Island, N.J. & N.Y. 9 
Shrewsbury River, N.J. (1950 & 1965 Act) 
Swanton Harbor, VT 6 
Ticonderoga River, N.Y. 1-6 
Waterbury, VT (1941 Act) 7, 8 
Waterford. N.Y. 6, 7 
Waycake Creek, NJ 
Westchester Creek, N.Y. 4 
1974 
1981 
1980 
1953 
1952 
1992 
1963 
1976 
1948 
1966 
1989 
1982 
1953 
1947 
1939 
1937 
1948 
1984 
1979 
1982 
1982 
1949 
1937 
1966 
1967 
1977 
1948 
1981 
1959 
1963 
1964 
1992 
1888 
1895 
1951 
1939 
1949 
1981 
Aug. 1982 
Aug. 1977 
Aug. 1982 
Aug.1982 
Jul 1992 
Aug. 1977 
1988 
Aug.1977 
Aug. 1977 
Jan 1990 
Aug. 1987 
Aug. 1977 
Aug. 1977 
Aug. 1977 
1988 
1988 
1988 
Jan 1990 
Aug. 1982 
Aug. 1982 
1988 
Jan 1990 
Jan 1990 
Aug. 1977 
Jan. 1990 
Aug. 1982 
Aug. 1982 
Aug. 1982 
1988 
Oct. 1992 
Jul 1992 
Jan 1990 
Aug. 1977 
Nov. 1983 
Nov. 1981 
Aug. 1982 
1988 
Aug. 1982 
1,149,946 
33,976 
40,000 
69,489 
3,503,969 13 
60 ,481 
165,882 
49,035 
49,837 
433,470 
1,551,470 
7,000 
167,760 
9,253 
175,933 
670,000 
1,159,946 12 
33,976 8 
40,000 
69,489 
100,000 
1,185,365 
60,481 
165,882 4,11 
39,468 
68,581 4,5 
49,837 
6,621 
21,000 
433,470 4 
37,000 4 
1,617,470 15 
7,000 
211,015 
70,500 4 
16,500 
9,253 
2,781 
175,933 
2-28 
TABLE 2-M 
1,947,853 
505,369 
30,675 
1,622 
59,391 
2,455 
76,497 
51,566 
1,621 
4,636 
257,237 
4,951 
441,656 
307 
10,113,903 
235 
1,260 
2,921,311

NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 
TABLE 2-M (Continued) 
1. No Commerce reported. 
2. Completed. 
3. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 
4. Uncomplete portion deauthorized. 
5. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended contributed 
funds. 
6. Inactive. 
7. Entire project deauthorized. 
8. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. 
9. Removal for navigation. 
TABLE 2-N 
10. Deepening 8 foot project to 10 feet. 
11. Includes $93,882 for Rehabilitation. 
12. Includes $10,000 expended from contributed funds. 
13. Includes $100,000 expended from contributed funds. 
14. Deepening project to 13 feet. 
15. Includes $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 
16. 1912 authorization. 
17. 1935 authorization. 
18. 1910 construction dikes. 
SECTION 107 
Project 
CONTINUE COORDINATING FEASIBILITY STUDY 
Belford Harbor N.J. 
TABLE 2-0 
Project 
INITIATE FEASIBILITY STUDY 
Plumb Beach, Jamaica Bay, N.Y. 
CONTINUE FEASIBILITY STUDY 
Shelter Island, N.Y. 
CONSTRUCTION FUNDING 
Asharoken Village, Northport, N.Y. 
COORDINATING PLANS & SPECS 
Rikers Island, East River, N.Y. 
Oakwood Beach, Staten Island, N.Y. 
FY 95 Cost 
SECTION 103 
FY 95 Cost 
$7,100 
$79,940 
$58,180 
$58,720 
Project 
COORDINATE RECONNAISSANCE STUDY 
Poplar Brook, Monmouth Co. NJ 
FEASIBILITY STUDY 
Mill Brook, Highland Park, N.J. 
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 
Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, N.Y. 
Elizabeth River, Hillside, N.J. 
COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION 
Yonkers, Nepera Park, N.Y. 
2-29 
TABLE 2-P SECTION 205 
FY 95 Cost 
$4,800 
$115,580 
$62,800 
$24,540 
$947,590

Fiscal Year 1995 
ANNUAL REPORT of the 
Chief of Engineers 
on Civil Works Actitivities 
Department of the ArmylCorps of Engineers 
EXTRACT 
report of the... 
PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT* 
This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern 
Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and 
southern Delaware, and a small Part of northeaster Maryland 
embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from 
Manasquan River, NJ inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It 
also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel 
thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, MD. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ..................... ..... 3-2 
2. Chesapeake and Delaware Canal 
St. Georges Bridge Replacement, DE.............................3-2 
3. Cohansey River, NJ.................... ..... 3-2 
4. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ.................................. ...... 3-3 
5. Delaware River between 
Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ.................................3-3 
6. Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE 
Philadelphia to the Sea............................... .. ....... 3-4 
7. Delaware River Vicinity of Camden, NJ ....................... 3-4 
8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE..................... ..... 3-5 
9. Inland Waterway from Delaware 
River to Chesapeake Bay DE, MD ....................... 3-5 
10. Inland Waterway Rehoboth 
to Delaware Bay, DE ............................. ....... 3-6 
11. Maurice River, NJ .............................. ....3-6 
12. Mispillion River,DE......................... ..... 3-7 
13. Murderkill River, DE...................................... ..... 3-7 
14. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway........................3-8 
15. Salem River, NJ...................................... ...... 3-8 
16. Schuylkill River, PA.............................. ..... 3-9 
17. Tom s River, NJ........................................ 3-10 
18. Tuckerton River, NJ.......... .............. ....... 3-10 
19. Wilmington Harbor, DE................................3-10 
Beach Erosion Control Page 
20. Beach Erosion Control Work 
Under Special Authorization ......................... ...3-11 
21. Cape May Inlet 
to Lower Twp., NJ............................ ....... 3-11 
22. Delaware Coast Protection, DE...............................3-12 
23. Great Egg Harbor Inlet 
and Peck Beach, NJ........................... ...................... 3-12 
26. Emergency Bank Protection............................................ 3-13 
27. Flood Control Work Under Special 
Authorization ..... .... ...... ............................................. 3-13 
28. Francis E. WalterDam,PA. ........................... 3-14 
29. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and 
Reservoir, PA ............................................ 3-14 
30. Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects.......................................3-14 
31. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees............................3-15 
32. Molly Ann's Brook, NJ................................... .... 3-15 
33. National Emergency Preparedness...............................3-15 
34. Navigation Work Under Special 
Authorization .................................. ............ 3-15 
35. Prompton Lake, PA................................... ...... 3-15 
36. Reconnaissance and Conditions Surveys........................3-16 
General Investigations Page 
37. Collection and Study of Basic Data.................................3-16 
38. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design.......................3-16 
39. Surveys................................3-16 
Tables Page 
TABLE 3-A Cost and Financial Statement ........................ 3-17 
TABLE 3-B Authorizing Legislation ................................. 3-22 
TABLE 3-C Other Authorized 
Navigation Projects.................. 3-27 
TABLE 3-D Other Authorized Beach 
Erosion Control Projects..............:..............3-31 
TABLE 3-E Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects............................................. 3-31 
TABLE 3-E Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects........................... ..... 3-32 
Flood Control Local Protection Page 
24. Beltzville Lake, PA........ .. ........... ... 3- 12 
25. Blue Marsh Lake, PA ........... ... .................................... 3-13 
* All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this 
chiapter.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
1. BARNEGAT INLET, NJ 
Location: On the east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south 
of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach 
on the south (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). 
This inlet is main the entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on 
New Jersey coast which are separated from the ocean by narrow 
barrier beaches. 
Previous Project: None 
Existing project: The existing project, adopted as HD 73-19 in 
1935 and modified as HD 74-85 in 1937 and HD 79-358 in 1946, 
provides for a channel eight feet deep through the inlet and ten feet 
deep through the outer bar, protected by two converging stone jetties 
and a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a 
northwesterly direction from the gorge in the inlet to Oyster Creek 
channel and through the latter channel to deep water in the bay. The 
project was modified in 1946 to provide for the maintenance of a 
channel eight feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat Light 
Harbor with the main inlet channel. The project length is about 4.5 
miles. (For details see page 203, Annual Report 1964.) 
The Supplemental Appropriation Act of 1985 contained language 
stating that the existing project has not worked as projected and, in 
fact, has created a hazard to navigation. As a result, the following 
administratively approved modifications are to be constructed as 
design deficiency conrrection measures: a new south jetty 4,270 feet in 
length along an alignment generally parallel to the existing north jetty, 
extending from the existing groin located near the Barnegat 
Lighthouse to the tip of the existing south jetty; a navigation channel 
300 feet wide to a depth of 10 feet below mean low water from the 
outer bar in the Atlantic Ocean to the north end of the existing sand 
dike in Barnegat Bay; remove the shoal located between the north 
jetty and the proposed navigation channel; jetty sport fishing facilities 
on the new jetty. All dredged material from initial construction would 
be placed on the shores of Barnegat Light between the existing and 
new south jetties, and would be stabilized by vegetation and sand 
fence. Dredged material from maintenance operations would be 
placed on the down draft beaches, the area between the existing and 
new south jetties, or in other locations as determined by a shoreline 
monitoring program. Estimated cost for new work (October 1990) 
Federal share is $31,200,000 and non-Federal is $14,230,000. (See 
Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See 
Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 
30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A local cooperation 
agreement for the approved modification was executed on 19 May 
1986 and a modification to the local cooperation agreement was 
executed on 20 March 1987. 
Terminal facilities: There are four docks or terminals in inner 
harubor at Barnegat Light which furnish adequate facilities for present 
commerce of locality. 
Operation during fiscal year: New work, contract: Monitoring, 
work on tide gage and supervision and administration. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, 
surveys, supervision and administration on south jetty, engineering 
and design on dredging, BCR update and installation of safety signs. 
Work also included dredging by the U.S. Government Dredge 
Currituck, accomplished from March 1, 1995 to May 9, 1995, and 
288,247 cubic yards of material at a total of $801,878. 
2. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE 
CANAL, ST. GEORGES BRIDGE 
REPLACEMENT, DE 
Location: The new St. Georges Bridge will carry the new 
Delaware State Route 1 over the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal in 
New Castle County, Delaware and will be located approximately 
2,200 feet west of the existing St. Georges Bridge. 
Previous project: None. 
Existing project: This project was authorized by the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990. It states that the project for 
navigation, Inland Waterway from the Delaware River to the 
Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the first 
section of the Act of August 30, 1935 (45 Stat. (030) and modified by 
the Act entailed an Act authorizing construction of a highway bridge 
across the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal at Saint Georges, 
Delaware, approved August 7, 1939 (53 Stat. 1240-1241) is modified 
to direct the Secretary to replace the highway bridge on United States 
Route 13 in the vicinity of St. Georges, Delaware, to meet current and 
projected traffic needs, at a Federal cost of $115,000,000. (See Table 
3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 
3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 
1995.) 
Local cooperation: The state will carry out the bridge 
replacement and the Secretary will reimburse the State for cost 
incurred. 
Terminal facilities: None. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: 
Reimbursement to the State of Delaware for construction of new 
bridge. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included a supervision and 
administration on construction of St. Georges Bridge Replacement. 
3. COHANSEY RIVER, NJ 
Location: Rises in Salem County, NJ, flows southerly and 
southwesterly 27 miles through Cumberland County, and empties into 
Delaware Bay about 62 miles below Philadelphia, Pa. (See Coast and 
Geodetic Survey Chart 1218.) 
Previous project: For details see page 1785, Annual report for 
1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, and page 348, Annual 
Report for 1938. 
3-2

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 
Existing project: A Channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from that 
depth in Delaware Bay through a neck of land at the mouth and within 
the river to the south side of Glass Street in Bridgeton, 19 miles above 
the mouth; thence a channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide to Broad 
Street; and thence 75 feet wide to Commerce Street Bridge, 19.25 
miles above the mouth; and a turning basin 12 feet deep and 800 feet 
long formed by widening the channel on the south side to a maximum 
width of 250 feet just below Glass Street. Section included in project 
is about 19.5 miles long. All depths refer to the plane of mean low 
water. Extreme tidal range is from about 2 feet below mean low 
water to about 3 feet above mean high water. Completed project cost 
$110,756 for new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous 
projects. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing 
existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for 
existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) Existing project was completed 
in 1939. 
Local cooperation: Complied with except local interests must 
fturnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for required maintenance. 
Terminal facilities: Twenty wharves, of which 16 are at 
Bridgeton and 4 at Greenwich. Facilities considered adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work 
included plans and specifications. 
4. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ 
Location: In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 
miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of 
Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New 
.lesev Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 
mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 
1219) 
Existing project: An entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet 
wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot 
depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a 
line joining the inner ends of the jetties, thence 20 feet deep and 300 
feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the 
section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal 
range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed 
in 1942.(For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962. See 
'able 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See 
'Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 
30, 1 995 ) 
Local cooperation: Complied with Act of 1907, except work of 
deepening and enlarging inner harbor which is 80 percent complete. 
Terminal facilities: See page 238 Annual Report for 1962. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work 
included supervision and administration. Dredging by the U.S. 
Government Side Casting Dredge Schweizer was accomplished from 
April 15, 1995 to April 30, 1995 and from September 13, 1995 to 
September 30, 1995 removing a total of 103,775 cubic yards of 
material at a total cost of $224,825. 
5. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN 
PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ 
Location: Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally 
southerly 367 miles, forming boundary line between New York and 
New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, 
and empties into Delaware Bay. (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey 
Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) 
Previous project: For details see page 1778 of annual report for 
1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual 
Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project: A channel from Allegheny Avenue, 
Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet 
deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including 
relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of 
bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 
feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 
1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet 
deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn 
Central railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. 
Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 
feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main 
channel to upper end of U.S.Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East 
Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial 
excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide 
through artificial island opposite Delanco, NJ, and for construction of 
such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in 
project is about 30.5 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of 
Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite 
Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston 
Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of 
Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and 
March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in the 
vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a 
portion of winter months due to ice. Existing project is 90 percent 
complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from 
Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed 
April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold 
Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at 
terminal which is in deferred category. (See Table 3-B at end of 
chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of 
chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: Modification authorized by 1954 River and 
Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal 
facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future 
maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local 
interest complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not 
provided suitable terminal facilities. 
Terminal facilities: There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from 
Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA to Trenton, NJ facilities are 
3-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port 
Series No. 8 (revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included, general maintenance, environmental monitoring, plans and 
specifications, monitoring of disposal areas and supervision and 
adminstration. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included environmental monitoring, 
surveys, general maintenance, engineering and design, and 
supervision and administration. 
6. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND 
DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA 
Location: See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 
295, and 280. 
Previous project: For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 
1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project: Provides for a channel from deep water in 
Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep 
and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep 
and 800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 
1,000-foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, 
Philadelphia, PA, 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe 
Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia 
Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy 
Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 
feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective length of 8,000, 5,200, 
12,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and 
about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes 
and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for 
maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia 
Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep 
and width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and 200 feet on West 
Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local 
interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet 
channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and 
Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such 
areas are so located as to be of benefit to generate navigation. Section 
included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane 
of mean low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued 
winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity 
of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 
miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 
miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 
1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel 
to 37 deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet 
deep and 60 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of 
channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that 
portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet 
wide channel portion is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing 
cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion of project is 
$2,951,000. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is 
about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from Naval Base to 
the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny 
Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage 
at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to 
construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and 
enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet 
deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and about 600 
feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond 
Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy. 
(See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. 
See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to 
Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor 
Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor 
annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 
1962 Annual Report for details.) 
Terminal facilities: There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks 
between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on the 
waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below 
Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, 
and 8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included lease of equipment, tide gages, development of emgency 
action plan, environmental monitoring, maintenance of disposal area 
arch site and Pea Patch. Maintenance dredging was accomplished by 
Weeks Marine Incorporated from October 1, 1994 to December 19, 
1994 removing 1,910,485 cubic yards of material at a cost of 
$2,426,316, dredging was also done from June 5, 1995 to September 
11, 1995 removing 224,928 cubic yards of material at a cost of 
$2,249,280. Also, accomplished by Weeks Marine Incorporated 
removial of 262,000 cubic yards of material from September 24, 1995 
to September 30, 1995 at a cost of $322,260. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, general 
maintenance of disposal areas, pipelines, turtle trawling, removal of 
debris, rock removal, general maintenance of Oldmans Groundwater 
study and Pennsgrove dispoal area, environmental monitoring, 
provisions for long term disposal needs, BCR update, plans and 
specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and 
administration. 
7. DELAWARE RIVER VICINITY OF 
CAMDEN, NJ 
Location: Camden, NJ, on east bank of Delaware River, is 
directly opposite the city of Philadelphia, PA. It is about 51 miles 
above mouth of the river and about 101 miles above Harbor of Refuge 
at the mouth of Delaware Bay. ( See U.S. Coast Guard and Geodetic 
Survey Charts Nos. 295 and 280.) 
Previous project: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of June 25, 
1910. No work was done on this project, for further details, see page 
321, Annual Report for 1932. 
Existing project: The existing project which is a modification to 
3-4

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 
the Delaware River from Philadelphia to the Sea project was adopted 
as House Document No. 63-1120 in 1919 and modified by House 
Document No. 70-111 in 1930 and House Document No. 77-353 in 
1945. Dredging to project depth of 37 feet in front of the Camden 
Marine Terminal was completed in March 1988. It also provides for 
dredging in of Camden to Newton Creek, with the depth increased to 
40 feet in front of the Beckett Street Marine Terminal. These depths 
extend from the ship channel in Delaware River to a line parallel with 
and 50 feet distant from the established pierhead line. The project 
length is about four miles. Projects depths are well maintained in 30 
foot depth section of channel. Plans and specifications for the 40 ft. 
approach channel improvements at Beckett Street were completed in 
1991. The Local Cooperation Agreement for this improvement was 
executed in December 1991. The dredging contract was awarded in 
May 1992 and essentially completed in September 1992. (See Table 
3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 
3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 
1995.) 
Local cooperation: Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. 
Operations during fiscal year: New Work, hired labor: Work 
included supervision and administration, engineering and design. 
8. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE 
Location: Indian River rises in Sussex County, DE, and flows 
easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 
miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway 
between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an 
opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and 
the Atlantic Ocean (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 
No. 1219.) 
Previous project: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 
2, 1882 For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. 
Existing project: This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the 
construction of two parallel jetties of steel-sheet pile and stone design 
extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and 
for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for 
a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 
lfeet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to 
and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet 
long at Old Landing; thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to 
the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the 
interior channel dimensions may, at the discretion of the Chief of 
Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic 
efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length 
of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths 
refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the 
highway bridge is about 6 feet. Existing project was completed in 
1951 F:or details see Annual Report for 1 963.(See Table 3-B at end 
of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end 
of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: Fully complied with except that local interest 
are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material 
during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal 
facilities. 
Terminal facilities: There is a privately owned basin with 
berthing facilities for small boats located .75 miles west of the 
highway bridge near the inlet and .25 miles north of the inlet channel, 
connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. 
Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same 
locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The 
facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included replacement offence and handrail. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included stabilization of jetties, 
plans and specifications, supervision and adminstration and 
engineering and design. 
9. INLAND WATERWAY FROM 
DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE 
BAY, DE, AND MD 
Location: The Waterway begins at Reedy Point on Delaware 
River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, PA, and passes through the 
sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to 
Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, MD. It then passes for 5 miles down 
Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and 
thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. 
A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, DE, 
with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point.(See 
U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) 
Previous project: For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 
242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. 
Existing project: A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from 
Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of 
natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn 
Central Railroad crossing, and having a maximum radius of curvature 
of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical 
clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the 
railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing 
requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in 
construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level 
fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at 
Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule 
drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of 
entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet 
deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; 
enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford 
an area about 400 feet wide, 1000 feet long, and 12 feet 
deep;dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 
feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of 
banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on 
3-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; 
and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, 
excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles 
long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in 
Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high 
water to 3 feet below mean low water. Existing project is about 89 
percent completed. Channel 27 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide. 
Delaware River to Pooles Island, completed in 1938. High-level fixed 
highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at 
Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. 
Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 
21, 1965. Enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide St. Georges 
and Summit bridges and Summit and Goose Island was completed on 
June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old 
Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21, 1972. 
Channel work for Part II is about 87 percent complete. Work 
remaining consists of completing channel enlargement to 35 feet deep 
and 450 feet wide between Reedy Point Bridge and St. Georges 
Bridge; widening and deepening the channel between Delaware River 
and Reedy Point Bridge, the completion of recreation facilities, and 
miscellaneous completion items. Deepening of the Delaware City 
Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth 
Steet Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. 
Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated 
cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 is federal cost 
$166,000,000 (October 1992). This portion is deauthorized. Major 
Rehabilitation of St. Georges and Summit Bridges was completed in 
tiscal year 1991 at an approximate federal cost of $20,868,000 (90 
price level). Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware 
City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge 
to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from 
foregoing estimate. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts 
authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total 
costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that 
local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way required for bridges. 
Assurances accepted and approved February 16, 1955. Requirements 
for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. 
Terminal facilities: Ample mooring facilities at eastern and 
western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. 
Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor 
was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities 
are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included general maintenance, archeaology study, vessel simulastion 
study, and lease of equipment. There was also maintenance dredging 
by Norfolk Dredging Company fiom October 21, 1994 to January 16, 
1995 removing a total of 1,383,880 cubic yards of material at a total 
cost of $2,532,500. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance of 
traffic control television, administration building, bridges, roadways, 
grounds, museum, auxilary works, and Worton Point. Also included 
in work was maintenance night lighting, installation of locks, lease of 
equipment, surveys, environmental monitoring, electrical 
maintanence, plans and specifications, engineering and design, and 
supervision and administration. 
10. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY 
TO DELAWARE BAY, DE 
Location: A tidal canal in southeasterly part of Sussex County, 
DE It extends 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high 
land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence down Lewes 
River to its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance 
to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape 
Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218, 
and 1219.) 
Previous project: A canal along a slightly different route formed 
a part of projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware 
Bay, begun in 1886 and abandoned in 1905. 
Existing project: This provides for an entrance channel near 
Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 
500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to 
South Street Bridge at Lewes, and a basin of the same depth 1,200 
feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a 
channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut 
near Rehoboth Bay) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 
feet wide from the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble 
jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the 
construction of the one highway bridge and one railroad Bridge to 
Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is 
about 12 miles. 
The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is 
considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost. 
The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to 
be $816,000. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For 
details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. 
Work remaining, extension of existing jetties at Delaware Bay 
entrance, is considered inactive. The Sheet Pile Jetty at the Delaware 
Bay entrance was removed during FY 1987. (See Table 3-B at end 
of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.See Table 3-A at end 
of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: Complied with except local interest must 
furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. 
Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance hired labor: Work 
included plans and specifications, surveys, property management, 
rehabilitation of jetties, and supervision and administration. 
11. MAURICE RIVER, NJ 
Location: This river rises in Gloucester County, N.J. flows 
southerly and southwesterly 33 miles through Cumberland County and 
3-6

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 
empties into Delaware Bay through Maurice Cove about 87 miles 
below Philadelphia, Pa. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey 
ChartNo. 1218.) 
Previous project: Adopted by the River and Harbor Act of 
August 2, 1882 and modified in 1890 and 1892. For further details 
see page 1785, Annual Report for the year 1915. 
Existing project: This provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 150 
feet wide in Delaware Bay across Maurice Cove to the mouth; thence 
a channel7 feet deep, 100 feet wide to the drawbridge at Millville, 
21.5 miles above the mouth and thence 60 feet wide to the mill dam, 
a further distance of one-half mile, including a turning basin at 
Millville. The total length of the section included in the project is 
about 24 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The 
mean tidal range at the mouth is 5.8 feet and at Millville 6.0 feet. The 
extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to 
about 1 foot above mean high water. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter 
for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A end of chapter 
for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: The project as modified by the River and 
Harbor Act of i935 provides that before the initial or any subsequent 
maintenance dredging is undertaken, suitable guaranties shall be 
furnished by responsible local interests that the United States and the 
contractors will be held and saved free of claims for damages because 
of the deposit of the eveavated material. It is expected that the 
conditions of local cooperation will be satisfactorily met during the 
liscalg'ear 1949. 
Terminal facilities: There are numerous wharves and piers at the 
several towns along the river. Public wharves are located at Millville, 
Mauricetown, Dorchester, Bivalve. Several boat yards with railways 
and repair and construction facilities are also located along the river. 
Most of the wharves at Millville and Bivalve have railroad 
connections. The facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included drilling and chemical testing. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, chemical 
testing, supervision and administration, and plans and specification. 
12. MISPILLION RIVER, DE 
Location: Rises in Kent County and Sussex Counties, DE, flows 
northeasterly 15 miles along the boundary line between the two 
counties and emties into Delaware Bay about 16 miles above Cape 
Henlopen .(See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218). 
Previous project: For details see page 1786, Annual Report for 
19 I1 5 , page 448 of Annual Report for 1918, and page 327 of Annual 
Report foIb19r3 8. 
Existing project: Project is about 31 percent complete. Four 
cutoffs for 6-foot channel were completed in 1923; 6-foot channel 
from Delaware Bay to Milford in 1924; and jetties at the mouth in 
1939. Work remaining is dredging channel to 9-foot depth, 80 feet 
wide in Delaware Bay to the mouth, thence 60 feet wide to Milford, 
with the provision of three cutoffs to eliminate bends, and a turning 
basin at Milford. Controlling depths at mean low water, in October 
1964 from Delaware Bay to mouth 7.1 feet, and thence to fixed 
highway bridge at Report 1957, (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for 
Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A end of chapter for 
total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: Assurances required by 1954 River and 
Harbor Act have not been furnished. For details see page 243, 
Annual Report for 1957. Prior requirements fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities: For details see page 244, Annual Report for 
1957. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work 
included environmental monitoring,, breach stabilization, plans and 
specifications, and supervision and administration. 
Maintenance, contract: Work included breach stabilization and 
environmental monitoring. There was also maintenance dredging 
done by Cottreal Engineering Corporation from November 1, 1994 to 
November 9, 1994 removing 32,363 cubic yards of material at a cost 
of $80,907. 
13. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE 
Location: Rises in Kent County, DE, flows northeasterly 19 miles 
through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above 
Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart no. 
1218.) 
Existing project: Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low 
water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet 
wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section 
included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from 
about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high 
water. 
Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion 
comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is 
to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated 
cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was 
authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 
21,52d Cong., Ist Sess. See page 981 Annual Report for 1892). 
Latest published map is in House Document 1058,62d Congress 3d 
Session. 
Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to 
be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 
1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. (See 
Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See 
Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 
30, 1995.) 
3-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Local cooperation: None required. 
Terminal facilities: There are a number of light timber wharves 
on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all 
privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included environmental monitoring. There was also maintenance 
dredging by Cottreal Engineering Corporation from October 23, 1994 
to October 30, 1994 removing 94,873 cubic yards of material at a 
cost of $587,008. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included environmental 
monitoring, surveys, and plans and specifications. 
14. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL 
WATERWAY 
Location: A sea level inland water route approximately parallel 
with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan 
Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, NJ to Delaware Bay about 
3 miles above Cape May point. Waterway extends through inlet and 
up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal 
through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then 
passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along 
New Jersey coast to Cape May Harbor; thence across Cape May 
County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England 
Creek basin.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts, 234, 795, 
825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) 
Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at 
mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the 
Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape 
May, NJ, by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, 
NJ, and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the 
construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor 
to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate 
jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is 
about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway 
remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. 
Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of 
$1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local 
interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape 
May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs 
estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). 
Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc 
133, 76th Cong., Ist Sess.) Latest published map is in project 
document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525,79th 
Cong., 2nd Sess., as extended by Public Law 240,82d Cong.), 
authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from 
appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and 
improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from 
Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency 
wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of 
maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over 
canal. 
Existing project is about 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep 
and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was 
completed in 1942 as well as two parallel stone jetties at Delaware 
Bay entrances and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, 
all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining consists of dredging 
a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at 
Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; 
however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel 
and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 
12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these 
depths by the State. Section 860 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 authorized, for preconstruction engineering 
and design, a 15 foot depth in the Vicinity of Cape May Harbor, titled 
as Cold Spring Inlet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts 
authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total 
costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: The project is subject to the conditions that 
the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and 
interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rights-of-way, and 
structures other than bridges for the Bayhead-Manasquan Canal; that 
the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all 
lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas required for 
construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the 
proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local 
interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the 
waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the 
navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal 
Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United 
States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from 
the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was 
completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required 
to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent 
maintenance of the proposed improvements. 
Terminal facilities: See Annual Report for 1962. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included repair of bulkead, supervision and administrationm, 
environmental monitoring, and relplacement fence for Pt. Pleasant. 
There was maintenance dredging by Barnegat Bay Dredging 
Company from March 6, 1995 to September 30, 1995 removing 
596,640 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $1,241,817. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, 
surveys, property management, environmental monitoring, and 
maintenance dredging. There was also plans and specifications for 
bank stabilization , replacement fence for Pt. Pleasant, engineering 
and design, and supervision and administration. 
15. SALEM RIVER, NJ 
Location: This river rises in Salem County, NJ, flows through the 
county westerly 13 miles, thence southerly 7 miles to the City of 
Salem, and thence westerly 3 miles, emptying into Delaware River 
about 45 miles below Philadelphia, PA. It is joined at Salem by Little 
Salem River, or Fenwick Creek, from the east. (See U.S. Coast and 
3-8

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 
Geodetic Survey Chart No. 294.) 
Previous project: The River and Harbor Act of July 11, 1870, 
provided for a survey and the original project was adopted by River 
and Harbor Act of March 3, 1871, and modified in 1878, and a 
subsequent project adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 2, 
1907. This project was further modified as HD 68-110 in 1925, 
providing an entrance channel from the Delaware River to the fixed 
highway bridge in Salem with dimensions and limits as shown, 
including a cut-off. The total project length is about 5 miles. For 
further details see page 1784, Annual Report for 1915; page 349 of 
Annual Report for 1924; and page 346 of Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project: In March 1995 the Secretary of the Army 
approved a modification to the previous project deepening the channel 
to 16 feet below mean low water between the Route 49 highway 
bridge and the Delaware River, a distance of about 5 miles. The 
channel would also widened to 150-250 feet and a trapaziodal shaped 
turning basin with a width of 495 feet and average length of 1000 feet 
would be provided. The project also contains 15.6 acres of wetland 
restoration to replace the loss of wetlands and shallow water habitat. 
Estimated cost for new work (October 1993) Federal share is 
$8,760,000 and non-Federal is $3,140,000. The portion of the project 
comprising the deepening of Little Salem River to 12 feet is to be 
restudied and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. The estimated 
cost of this portion revised in 1953 is $28,000 excluding an equal 
amount to be contributed by local interests. 
l'hc exising project is about 64 percent completed. The dredging 
of the channel from Penns Neck Bridge to project dimensions, 
including the cutoff, was completed in 1928. The channel from Penns 
Neck Bridge to the fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River was 
dredged to a depth of 9 feet under a previous project. The work 
remaining to be done is the deepening of the channel in Little Salem 
River from 9 feet to 12 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts 
authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total 
costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
The controlling depths at mean low water were as follows: In January 
1961, Delaware River to Penns Neck Highway Bridge 12.0 feet; and 
thence in December 1956 to the fixed highway bridge at Salem, 0.9 
feet.
The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of 
March 3, 1925 (H.Doc. 110, 68th Cong. 1st Sess.) The latest 
published map is in this document. Section 859 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized a project depth of 20 
feect. 
Local cooperation: The local cooperation agreement was executed 
on March 31, 1995 and requires that the Non-Federal sponsor 
provides cash in the amount of $779,000 and "other" (disposal area 
and assciated costs) costs of $1,556,000. 
Terminal facilities: There are 9 wharves on the river all at Salem, 
N.i. Eight wharves are privately owned and one is owned by the City. 
lhe facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included environmental monitoring, mitigation for wetlands loss, 
surveys, engineering an design, installation of utility lines. There was 
maintenance dredging by Weeks Marine Incorporated from June 5, 
1995 to September 25, 1995, removing 423,558 cubic yards of 
material at a cost of $1,961,073. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included BCR update, 
engineering and design and plans and specifications. 
16. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA 
Location: Rises in Schuylkill County, PA, flows generally 
southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at 
Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 
and 280.) 
Previous project: For details see page 325, Annual Report for 
1932. 
Existing project: This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 
400 feet wide in Delaware River the mouth and within the river to 
29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 
feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; 
thence 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles 
above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to 
University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including 
widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the 
project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low 
water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy 
winds, is about 14 feet. 
The cost for new work for the completed existing project was 
$7,440,000. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For 
details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter 
for acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter 
for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, 
imposed the condition that the City of Philadelphia agree to remove 
60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that 
portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer 
may designate until such time as adequate municipal 
sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective 
operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the 
completion of sewage-treatment works by the City of Philadelphia. All 
other requirements have been fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities: There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks 
within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for 
existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7, Revised 
1967, Corps of Engineers.) 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work 
included surveys, general maintenance, plans and specifications, BCR 
update, and supervision and administration. 
3-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
17. TOMS RIVER, NJ 
Location: This river rises in Ocean county, New Jersey, flows 
easterly 19 miles, and empties into Barnegat Bay about 1 1 miles north 
of Barnegat Inlet. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey chart No. 
1216.) 
Previous project: None. 
Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep to 
mean low water, 100 feet wide from the New Jersey Intercoastal 
Waterway in Barnegat Bay to the highway bridge over South Fork at 
Toms River, including a turning basin, and a channel 5 feet deep the 
full width in the North Fork to the highway bridge. The total length 
of the section included in the project is about 5 miles. The mean 
range of tide is about 0.5 feet; and extreme tidal range is about 1.8 
feet.
The estimate cost for new work, revised in 1950, is $295,050. 
The latest (1950) approved estimate for annual cost of maintenance 
is $12,500. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing 
existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for 
existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: The Act authorizing the 12-foot channel 
imposed the conditions that local interests agree to provide and 
maintain adequate wharf facility, suitable and adequate disposal areas 
when and as required for the initial work and subsequent 
maintenance, and give assurance satisfactory to the Secretary of War 
that the United States will be held and secured free from any claims 
for damage to natural or planted bed of oysters in Barnegat Bay that 
may arise as a result of work under the project. These conditions have 
not been fulfilled. 
Terminal facilities: There are numerous light timber piers 
landings and slips along the shores of the river. The bulkhead island 
at the head of navigation serves as a public dock. There are also three 
boatyards with facilities for overhauling boats up to 50 feet in length. 
The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included chemical and water testing. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, plans and 
specifications and supervision and administration. 
18. TUCKERTON CREEK, NJ 
Location: This creek rises in Ocean County, NJ flows southerly 
7 miles, and empties into Little Egg Harbor about 8 miles north of 
Little Egg Inlet. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 
825 and 1216.) 
Previous project: This provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet 
wide from the head of Marchelder Channel in Little Tuckerton Bay to 
the mouth; thence 75 feet wide to Parkers Landing, 1 mile above the 
mouth; thence 60 feet wide to West Tuckerton Landing, 1.75 miles 
abovethe mouth; thence a channel 5 feet deep and 60 feet wide to just 
above Scow Landing, 2 miles above the mouth; and thence a channel 
3 feet deep and 40 feet wide to the Mill Dam at Tuckerton 2.25 miles 
above the mouth. The total length of the section included in the 
project is about 3.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low 
water. Then mean tidal range is 2. 5 feet. The extreme tidal range is 
from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 1 foot above mean 
high water. 
The cost of new work for the complete project was $60,242. (See 
Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See 
Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 
30, 1995.) 
Existing project: Completed in 1925. 
Local cooperation: None required. 
Terminal facilities: There are a number of wharves and piers of 
pile-and timber-construction along the creek. There are also four 
boatyards with marine railways, and repair and storage facilities 
located at Tuckerton. One wharf at Tuckerton is publicly owned. The 
facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work 
included BCR update. 
19. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE 
Location: Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle 
County, DE, flows northeasterly 16 miles, passing through the City of 
Wilmington, DE, and.empties into Delaware River about 29 miles 
below Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 
294.) 
Previous project: For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 
1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project: This provides for a channel 38 feet deep and 
400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to 
Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 
250 feet wide for the distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine 
River, thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 
2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River 
ship channel; thence decreasing to a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 
750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No.4; and thence 7 feet deep 
and 100 feet wide for a distance of of about 5.6 miles to Newport, DE, 
approximately 9.9 miles above Delaware River ship channel, 
including a turning basin 38 feet deep opposite the Wilmington 
Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell 
Canal, 320 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel 
and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. 
It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of 
a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long 
on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet 
long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, 
and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of 
3-10

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 
Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of Brandywine and 
260 feet long on the Christina. Depths refer to the plane of mean low 
water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is 
about 13 feet. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details 
see page 222, Annual Report 1962.) Authority from Section 107 of 
the River and Harbor Act of July 1960 provide for channel and 
turning basin deepening from 35 to 38 feet and the turning basin 
widened from 200 to 320 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for 
Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for 
total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities: There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks 
within limits of the improvement. Facilities considered adequate for 
existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No.8, revised 
1966-Corps of Engineers.) 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included environmental monitoring, lease of equipment, wetland 
mitigation, monitoring of artificial reefs, removal of sheet pile 
bulkhead and lease of equipment. There was maintenance dredging 
by C.J. Langenfelder from June 7, 1995 to September 30, 1995 
removing 348,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $313,200. 
Dredging was also done by Norfolk Dredging Company from October 
19, 1994 to November 23, 1994 removing 570,394 cubic yards of 
material at a cost of $513,355. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, 
environmental monitoring, surveys on maintenance dredging, wetland 
mitigation, removal of dredged material, disposal area ditching, 
bulkhead replacement, removal of sheet pile, construction of dikes 
and sluices, plans and specificatons, drainage of disposal area, 
engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 
Beach Erosion Control: 
20. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK 
UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public 
Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). 
Name of Project 
Seaside Park, NJ 
Cost to 30 Sept. 1995 
Reconnaissance Reports
$ 8,093 
21. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TWP., NJ 
Location: The proposed project is located in Cape May County 
and extends along the beach front from the northern side of Cape May 
Inlet to the boundary of Lower Township, and Cape May City. 
Existing project: The plan, as presented in HD 94-641, was 
authorized for the Phase I Design Memorandum Stage of Advance 
Engineering and Design by Section 101a of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1976, proposes the following features: 
breakwater on the updrift side of Cape May Inlet; beachfill from Cape 
May Inlet to Cape May Point; provision of a dune with sand fence and 
grass from Cape May Inlet to Wilmington Avenue; construction of 
two groins in Cape May City and seven groins in Lower Township; 
inclusion of all groins comprising the existing project; and periodic 
nourishment of the beaches and maintenance of the dune and dikes. 
The Phase I GDM, completed in August 1980 and approved by the 
Chief of Engineers in December 1981, determined that only beach 
erosion control measures in Cape May City are warranted. The plan 
proposed in that document consists of modifying the existing 
navigation project for Cape May Inlet to provide; a weir-breakwater 
at Cape May Inlet with construction being deferred pending 
demonstration of need; two new groins at Trenton and Baltimore 
Avenues in Cape May City; placement ofbeachfill between Cape May 
Inlet and the terminal groin at Third Avenue in Cape May City; 
maintenance of two new groins and existing groins in Cape May; 
periodic beach maintenance with material obtained from deposition 
basin on the northeast side of Cape May Inlet; and institution of a 
beach monitoring program in Lower Township area. Work for the 
initial beachfill was accomplished as follows; USGS feeder beach 
fiscal year 1989, Cape May City groin fiscal year 1990, and Beachfill 
Cape May City fiscal year 1991. Project estimate costs (October 
1993) is Federal, $163,680,000, which includes $58,380,000 of 
Coast Guard contributions non-Federal costs are $11,200,000. 
The existing authority is for Phase I studies as provided by Section 
101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in 
accordance with the provision of House Document 94-641. 
Continuation of planning and engineering for this proposed project 
was initiated in October 1977. The Phase I GDM was completed in 
August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 
1981. Phase II AE&D studies were completed in July 1983. The 
project was authorized for separable elements under Section 501(a) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. (See 
Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See 
Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 
30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: The State of New Jersey furnished a letter of 
intent on 6 May 1981 regarding their willingness to comply with the 
above items of local cooperation. In addition, a draft Section 221 
local cooperation agreement has been coordinated with letter of intent 
on May 31, 1983 regarding compliance with the items of local 
cooperation. 
Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work 
included periodic nourishment, monitoring, aerial photography, 
rehabilitation of inlet, plans and specification of beachfill groin, and 
supervision and adminstration on construction. There was 
maintenance dredging done by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company 
from October 14, 1994 to April 12 1995 removing 330,683 cubic 
yards of material at a cost $1,812,142. 
New Work, hired labor: Work included inlet monitoring, 
supervision and administraton and engineering and design. 
3-11

REPORT OF TIHE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
22. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE 
Location: The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on 
the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay 
extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick 
Island on the Delaware-Maryland border. 
Previous Project: The previous project, adopted as HD 85-216 
in 1958 and modified by P.L. 87-874 in 1962, provided for Federal 
participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic 
nourishment, and the initial periodic nourishment was completed in 
1957 by local interests. The second increment of beach 
replenishment by local interest was completed in 1963. 
Existing project: Provides a plan of improvement which consists 
of the construction of a sand bypass system and periodic nourishment 
until 2027. (For details, see S. Doc. 90,90th Cong. 2d Sess.) 
Estimated cost of project (October 1993) is $30,800,000 of which 
$12,600,000 are federal costs and $18,200,000 are required 
non-Federal costs. The construction of the feeder beach north of 
Indian River Inlet was completed in 1973 and nourished in 1978, and 
1984 Section 869 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
deauthorized the unshceduled portion of the project. (See Table 3-B 
at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A 
at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: Assurances of local cooperation were 
provided by the State of Delaware, January 13, 1981. 
Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work 
included monitoring and sand bypassing. 
New work, hired labor: Work included sand bypassing, 
monitoring, supervision and administration, and engineering and 
design. 
23. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK 
BEACH, NJ 
Location: The project is located in Cape May and Atlantic 
Counties, New Jersey. Great Egg Harbor Inlet, an unimproved inlet, 
is about 1.1 miles wide at its narrowest point and provides a tidal 
connection between the Atlantic Ocean, Great Egg Harbor Bay, the 
New Jersey Intercoastal Waterway, and Great Egg Harbor River. 
Peck Beach is occupied in its entirety by the City of Ocean City and 
extends fiom Great Egg Harbor Inlet southward to Corson Inlet. The 
ocean frontage is about eight miles in length. 
Existing project: The recommended plan consists of providing 
initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a 
minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean 
low water. The beachfill will extend from Surf Road southwest to 
34th Street with a 1000 foot taper south of 34th Street. This plan will 
require the initial placement of 4,118,000 cubic yards of material and 
subsequent periodic nourishment of approximately 1,072,000 cubic 
vard.s eve3y three years. The material for the initial construction, and 
periodic nourishment will be taken from the ebb shoal area located 
approximately 5,000 feet offshore of the Great Egg Harbor Inlet. 
Additionally, the construction of the project will require the extension 
of 38 storm drain pipes. All work is programmed. Estimated cost for 
new work (October 1993) Federal share is $449,000,000 and 
non-Federal is $242,000,000. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for 
Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for 
total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local Cooperation: Federal participation in the proposed project 
is recommended and contingent on the local sponsor signing the Local 
Cooperation Agreement which identifies the required items of 
cooperation. In a letter dated 28 September 1990, the State of New 
Jersey identified a funding source for their costs and indicated that 
they were prepared to proceed with the final negotiations to sign the 
Local Cooperation Agreement as required by Section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-61 1, 42 U.S.C. 196d-5b) and by 
the Water Resource Development ACT of 1986 (Public Law 
99-662).The Local Cooperation agreement was executed in 
September 1991. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included surveys, periodic nourishment, and supervision and 
administration . There was maintenance dredging Great Lakes 
Dredge & Dock Company from October 14, 1994 to September 27, 
1995 removing 605,700 cubic yards of material at a cost of 
$1,665,675. There was also maintenance dredging done by 
Bean/Weeks from May 15, 1995 to September 22, 1995 removing 
1,400,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $4,588,000. 
Maintenance hired labor: Work included monitoring, aerial 
photography, prepartory work, engineering and design, and 
supervision and adminstration. 
Flood Control: 
24. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA 
Location: Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles 
upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of 
Lehighton, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for 
Lehighton, PA-1960.) 
Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project 
providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of 
improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,200 feet long 
rising 170 feet above creekbed; a spillway around the north end of 
dam; and gate control outlet works discharging through a conduit on 
rock along right abutment The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for 
flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a 
reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 
1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 39,830 acre-feet for water supply 
and recreation, and 27,030 acre-feet for flood control. The cost of 
project was $22,931,400 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal 
reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life 
of project. The construction of the dam and appurtenances was 
completed in 1971. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts 
authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total 
3-12

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 
costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1995.) 
Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain 
requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved 
House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission 
providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution 
control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of 
water supply costs was signed October 16,1966. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included maintenance of stream gauge, water quality testing and 
monitoring, sedmintation surveys, computer maintenance, 
management of historical property, lease of equipment, repair of 
water control device, replacement of fuel tanks, USGS Storm Gage 
Program, snow surveys and bridge inspections. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and 
maintenance of reservoir, monitoring of water contral devices, 
relocation of highway power unit sedimintation survey, maintenance 
of stream gage, plans and specifications on access road, periodic 
inspections, water quality testing and monitoring, engineering and 
design, and supervision and administration. 
25. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA 
Location: Dam site is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles 
upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles 
northwest of Reading, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, 
Bernville, PA) 
Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project 
providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Construction 
started in 1974 and was completed in 1980. The dam is 1,775 feet 
long and rises 98 feet above creekbed, with spillway about 1,500 feet 
south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a 
conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of 
comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware 
River Basin, has a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, 
with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water 
supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control.(For 
details see H.Doc 533 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) Cost of project 
$63,163,791. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control 
Act. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing 
project See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing 
project to Sept. 30, 1995.) (H. Doc. 533, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., 
contains latest published maps.) 
Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain 
requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document 
cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 
1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of 
water supply costs. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included well maintenance, visitor center maintenance, installation of 
\\water control device, computer maintenance, bridge inspection, 
surveys by USGS, work on stilling basin, maintenance of collection 
booth services, snow surveys and NOAA Weather Service 
Cooperation. Work also included maintenance of boat launch dry 
brooks and day use area and emergency gate repair. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and 
maintenance of resevoir and recreation area, installation of water and 
sewege devices, lease of equipment, installation of roof and 
communication equipment, maintenance of sewage treatment plant, 
water quality testing, archeaology study, bridge inspections, survey 
monitoring, recreation safety program, and repair of trash racks. 
There was work on joint use of water facilities, stilling basin, boat 
launch, day use area, installation of siding on storage barn, 
engineering and design and supervision and administration. Also 
incurred were costs for maintenance of visitors center. 
26. EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION 
Emergency Bank Protection Section 14, Public Law 79-526. 
Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept 1995 
Feasibility Reports 
Stoney Creek East Norriton, PA 
27. 
$31,402 
FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 
80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). 
Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept 1995 
Reconnaissance Reports 
Darby Creek, Colwny Borough, PA 
Martins Creek, Tullytown, PA 
Mill Creek, Upper Moreland, PA 
North Branch, Rancocas Creek, NJ 
Naylor's Run , Cobbs Creek, PA 
West Branch Delaware River, 
Stamford, NY 
$9,400 
$8,377 
$65,328 
$58,863 
$27,841 
$13,055 
Feasibility Reports 
Little Mill Creek, New Castle City, DE 
North Branch Newton Creek, 
Woodlynne, NJ 
$61,609 
$25,070 
Construction 
Delaware River, Port Jervis 
Palmerton, PA 
$808,555 
$31,952 
Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and 
rescue work (Public Law 99; 84th Congress, and 
3-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
supervision and administration. 
Fiscal year costs were $355,213 for disaster preparedness. 
28. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA 
Location: Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh 
River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 
mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of 
Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, PA(See Geological 
Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, PA) 
Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1946 Flood 
Control Act (H. Doc. 587,79th Cong.,2d Sess.) provided for a 
single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, 
authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc.522,87th Cong., 2d 
Sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply 
and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control 
project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway, increasing 
height of dam, constructing a new intake tower, extending outlet 
tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes 
and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 264 feet above 
riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of 
comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware 
River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 181,000 acre-feet 
spillway crest level with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 
acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for 
flood control. Total cost is $186,000,000, Estimated Federal cost of 
new work (October 1993) is $30,000,000 including $156,000,000 
required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water 
supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is 
initiated. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was 
completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 
1962. The advance engineering and design for the modified project is 
completed. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing 
existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for 
existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. 
Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to 
certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 
522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission expressed 
its support by a resolution dated 23 April 1980 and reiterated its 
sponsorship for the modified project in August 1985, October 1985, 
and July 1988. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included USGS Stream Gage repair, water quality monitoring, 
maintanence of water control devices, lease of equipment, replace of 
piezometer, replace guardrail, services by NOAA Weather Service. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and 
maintenance of reservoir, repair access road and roof, installation leak 
detection devices, repair of piezometer and general maintenance. 
There was also, rehabilitation of operations building, maintenance on 
recreational facility, data collection, plans and specifications, water 
quality testing and monitoring, engineering and design, and 
29. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND 
RESERVOIR, PA 
Location: In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne 
County, PA, between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners 
Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek and 
Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of 
Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey 
Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) 
Existing project: A single-purpose flood control reservoir with 
a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 
1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creek bed. It also 
has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a 
stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a 
drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of 
Dybeny Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above 
Honesdale, PA. Construction of project was authorized by 1948 
Flood Control Act (H.Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Project 
completed in June 1960. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts 
authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total 
costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: Assurances of Compliance with requirements 
of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 1956. For details see page 
251, Annual Report for 1962. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included surveys, USGS Stream Gaging, and NOAA Weather 
Service, repair of water control device. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and 
maintenance of the reservoir, historical property management, repair 
of water control devices, engineering and design, and supervision and 
administration. 
30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and 
operating completed projects as required, inspections were made as 
follows: 
PROJECT INSPECTION DATES 
Bethlehem, PA 
Darby Creek, PA 
Shellpot Creek, PA 
June 1995 
August 1995 
September 1995 
Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in 
accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $15,477. 
3-14 
legislation).

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICr 
31. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL 
LEVEES 
Inspection ofnon-federal levees were conducted at the following sites: 
Name of Project 
Construction 
Wilmington Harbor, DE 
cost to30 Sept. 1995 
$44,827 
PROJECT INSPECTION 
Honesdale, PA 
Hawley, PA 
Stoudsburg/East Stroudsburg, PA 
DATES 
July 1995 
July 1995 
July 1995 
32. MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NJ 
Location: Approximately 12 miles northwest of New York City, 
is located in Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, New Jersey along 
Molly Ann's Brook from the mouth below Totowa Avenue in Paterson 
upstream to Church Street in Haledon. 
Previous project: None. 
Existing project: The recommended plan is modified channel 
with a total length of 2.5 miles. The channel includes both trapezoidal 
channel sections and walled sections. Five bridges will be replaced 
and one building will be removed. Estimated cost of project (October 
1993) is $ 340,000,000 of which $ 238,000,000 are federal costs and 
$ 102,000,000 are required non-federal costs. Cost are in accordance 
with Section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act (Public 
Law 99-662), dated November 17, 1986. (See Table 3-B at end of 
chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end 
of chapter for total costs for existing Project to Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A Project Cooperation 
Agreement was executed on December 16, 1993. The State of New 
Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy, the 
non-federal sponsor, provided their support thru the Intermodal 
Surface Transportation Act of 1991 with appropriated state funds. 
Terminal facilities: None. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included mitigation, pragmitis, and environmental monitoring. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included bank stabilization, 
maintenance of utility lines, and engineering and design. 
33. NATIONAL EMERGENCY 
PREPAREDNESS 
[he total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to S97,646. 
34. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. 
35. PROMPTON LAKE, PA. 
Location: In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne 
County, PA, between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. 
Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from 
Honesdale, PA, and approximately 30 miles above confluence of 
Lackawaxen and Delaware River. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle 
Sheet, Honesdale, PA) 
Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood 
Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., Ist Sess.) provides for a 
single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of projeo, 
authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.Doc 522, 87th Cong,~a2d� 
Sess.) provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply 
and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control 
project. Plan of improvement requires construction of control tower 
with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley 
walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing 
land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 
Flood Control Act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and 
rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right 
abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works 
discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, and will be 
provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a 
unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of 
Delaware River basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet: 3,500 
acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and 
recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal 
cost of new work (October 1993) is $3,400,000 including 
$49,980,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated 
to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage 
is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act 
was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual 
Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control 
Act was preconstruction engineering and design. (See Table 3-B at 
end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See table 3-A at 
end of chapter for total cost for existing project to-Sept. 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation: Project modification was approved subject to 
certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 
522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act 
of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 
18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply was not 
urgent at that time. However recent studies conducted by DRBC have 
determined that there is now a need for water supply. In August 1983, 
DRBC expressed their strong support for the project modification. 
Preconstruction engineering and design was initiated in 1966, 
suspended in 1968 and again suspended in and resumed in 1986. 
Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work 
included lease of equipment, USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging, 
National Weather Service Report Network, and water quality testing. 
3-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON ~WIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and 
maintenance of reservoir, dam surveys, maintenance of operations 
building,, instrumentation and surveillance, maintenance of relief well, 
water quality monitoring and testing, engineering and design, and 
supervision and administration. 
36. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION 
SURVEYS 
General ~Investigations: 
37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC 
DATA 
Cost and expenditures during the period for flood plain information 
studies were $320,550. 
Condition Surveys 
Broadkill, DE 
Maurice River, NJ 
Mispillion River, DE 
Murderkill River, DE 
Oyster Creek, NJ 
Tuckerton, NJ 
Toms River, NJ 
Survey Conducted 
March 1995 
February 1995 
October 1995 
October 1995 
May 1995 
March-April 1995 
February 1995 
38. PRECONSTRUCTION 
AND DESIGN O 
ENGINEERING 
Cost and expenditures during the period totaled $2,927,382. 
39. SURVEYS 
Cost for the period were $264,011 for navigation studies: $83,339 for 
flood control studies, $2,374,163 for shoreline protection studies, 
$98,839 for special studies: a total of $2,820,352 
3-16

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 
TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section 
in Text Projects Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 SEPT. 30, 1995 
1 . Barnegat Inlet, NJ 
(Regular 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
2. Chesapeake & Delaware 
Canal, St. George's 
Bridge Replacement 
3 Cohansey River, 
NJ 
(Regular 
Funds) 
4 Cold Spring 
Inlet, NJ 
(Regular 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
5 Delaware River 
between Philadelphia, 
PA and 
Trenton, NJ 
(Regular 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
6 Delaware River, 
PA, NJ, AND DE 
Philadelphia 
to the Sea 
(Regular 
Funds) 
Rehab. 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
3,236,000 
6,718,919 
727,000 
721,945 
1,500,000 
2,985,298 
-34,853 20,024 -98,076 
31,083,849 
30,970,474 
989,000 1,103,000 754,000 17,146,933 
988,164 1,113,179 751,511 17,133,145 
-74,417 6,199 -30,698 6,l99 -30,698 
13,917,000 
13,793,926 
14,000,000 14,000,000 14,000,000 14,000,000 63,000,000 
13,979,822 14,010,861 14,008,924 13,997,231 62,997,017 
146,756' 
146,7462' 
563,000 
561,463 
- - 12,300 3,754,712 
- - 12,241 3,749,983 
- - - 879,275 
- - - 879,275 
249,000 140,000 135,000 5,903,651 
247,889 142,029 123,431 5,891,456 
-- - - 1,134,346 
S- - - 1,134,346 
- .- - 150,00010 
S- - - 150,000 '0 
S- - - 72,147,8003 
-- - - 72,147,800' 
612,000 1,567,000 371,000 1,925,000 45,009,037' 
611,586 1,563,786 371,630 1,922,127 45,000,081' 
15,000 
15,000 
57,879,872' 
57,879,872 s 
Approp. 15,369,767 17,374,000 12,744,500 11,563,500 446,576,56819 
Cost 15,371,772 17,030,417 12,631,415 11,649,045 446,175,906 9 
3-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section 
in Text Projects Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 SEPT. 30, 1995 
Approp. 
Cost 
508,324 
508,324 
7. Delaware River 
Vincinity of Camden 
(Regular 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
8 Indian River 
Inlet and Bay, DE 
(Regular 
Funds) 
Rehab. 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
9 Inland Waterway 
from Delaware River 
to Chesapeake 3ay, 
DE, and MD 
(Regular 
Funds) 
10. Inland Waterway, 
Rehoboth Bay to 
Delaware Bay, DE 
and MD) 
(Regular 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
1 1 Maurice River, NJ 
(Regular 
Funds) 
12 Mispillion River, DE 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
3,930,000 -350,000 -300,000 -180,000 
3,364,363 161,141 -395,362 -85,104 
-- -- 2,035,000 -7,400 
-- - 2,030,685 -3,125 
1,720,000 
1,145,122 
79,000 
78,624 
-164,299 
1,931 
2,555 
23,739 
250,000 
243,074 
4,986,906' 
5,045,814' 
2,390,562 
2,390,359 
-- 2,705,000 
93,111 2,056,928 
70,000 
74,999 
511,210" 
511,210' 
4,260,974 
4,258,326 
1,323,775 
1,323,775 
-- 210,000 
- 210,000 
- 132,535,591' 
- 132,532,598' 
8,913,000 
8,809,414 
-278,151 
-265,000 
86,000 
87,828 
9,652,000 11,763,000 12,054,600 261,385,965' 
9,609,681 11,725,894 12,101,644 261,175,6849 
-20,000 
-3,449 -2,652 
-- 17,356,718 
- 17,357,915 
158,000 1,897,000 283,000 
153,604 1,903,205 276,019 
- 52,600 
- 52,200 
160,000 
160,001 
561,514 
561,514 
4,658,228 
4,649,228 
60,000 
60,000 
I110,000 
110,000 
282,600 
282,201 
3-18

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 
TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section 
in Text Projects Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 SEPT. 30, 1995 
(Regular 
Funds) 
13. Murderkill 
River, DE 
(Regular 
Funds) 
14 New Jersey 
Intracoastal 
Waterway 
(Regular 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
15 Salem River, NJ 
(Regular 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
16 Schuylkill 
River, PA 
(Regular 
Funds) 
17 Toms River, NJ 
(Regular 
Funds) 
18 Tuckerton River, NJ 
New Work 
(Regular 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
176,000 
151,782 
40,000 
33,052 
3,196,000 
3,185,888 
390,000 
389,000 
73,000 1,795,000 183,200 
72,774 1,825,184 187,093 
34,000 45,000 200,300 
31,120 54,712 202,761 
738,839 
738,83925 
4,119,00726 
4,205,1832 
37,630 
37,630 
2,312,414 
2,314,759 
71,549" 
71,549" 
1,662,000 250,000 2,831,000 42,949,31612 
1,683,587 243,074 2,829,579 42,934,98312 
1,196,581 
1,196,581 
99,000 
99,000 
1,800,000 3,560,000 3,750,6342 
- 409 3,701,461 3,809,5042 
80,000 
76,781 176 
26,000 
25,587 
2,873,1736 
2,869,6776 
1,399,000 1,450,825 
119,509 171,334 
- - 3,334,007" 
- - 3,334,007" 
965,000 
961,697 
155,000 1,533,000 25,000 31,720,549 
142,299 1,538,273 25,387 31,709,701 
- 32,000 228,000 
--- 195.185 
Approp. 
10,050 
10,050" 
293,311 
260,800 
60,242 
3-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 3-A 
See 
Section 
in Text Projects 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
FY92 FY93 
Funds) 
19. Wilmington 
Harbor, DE 
(Regular 
Funds) 
Contributed 
Funds) 
21. Cape May Inlet 
to Lower Twp., NJ 
(Regular 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
22. Delaware Coast 
Protection 
(Regular 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
23. Great Egg Harbor 
Inlet & Peck 
Beach, NJ 
(Regular 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
24. Beltzville 
Lake, PA 
(Regular 
Funds) 
24. Blue Marsh 
Lake, PA 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
NewWork 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
- 29,000 
15,384 
60,242 
667,917 
654,244 
S1,954,72514�' 
- - - 1,954,725"' 
2,611,000 2,375,000 2,575,000 3,092,000 80,611,725 
2,610,850 2,281,273 2,569,553 3,079,009 80,562,862 
60,000"7 
60,000"7 
-3,805,000 
136,785 2,276,995 
839,258 
107,986 
165,000 
96,789 
14,008 
-1,260,000 14,284,176 
65,012 1,973,616 13,671,534 
-250,000 150,000 
271,795 31,292 191,164 
158,000 159,000 64,000 
-47,560 149,863 163,006 
2,574,758 
2,773,313 
4,879,95320 
4,257,30720 
215,350 
215,350 
1,268,6712l 
4,339 1,259,00221 
New Work 
Approp. 8,317,000 12,967,000 
Cost 6,352,622 14,024,986 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
6,000,000 4,850,000 
4,978,243 7,272,965 
686,000 
676,836 
-4,801,000 26,994,000 
-511,375 6,163,478 26,622,305 
-461,261 
3,275,000 15,625,000 
3,229,367 15,480,575 
22,931,831 
22,931,831 
661,000 750,000 740,500 
661,568 747,904 738,073 
10,997,589 
10,961,387 
63,180,300 
3-20 
FY94 FY95 SEPT. 30, 1995 
- r 1, I - - -: 
Funding _

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 
TABLE 3-A 
Sec 
Section 
in Text _ Projects 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 
(Regular 
Funds) 
28 Francis E. 
Walter Dam, PA 
(Regular 
Funds) 
29. General Edgar 
Jadwin Dam and 
Reservoir, PA 
(Regular 
Funds) 
32 Molly Ann's Brook, NJ 
(Regular 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
35 Prompton Lake 
(Regular 
Funds) 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
296 1,053 63,180,299 
2,093,800 1,786,600 1,799,100 2,155,000 21,441,294 
2,050,013 1,742,141 1,726,066 2,252,557 21,347,012 
-47,000 
13,427 
12,449,682" 
909 12,352,753's 
1,448,000 623,000 680,000 973,000 11,455,949 
1,450,336 602,670 683,032 995,803 11,449,078 
259,000 
235,652 
340,000 
264,137 
160,000 308,300 196,000 
182,404 310,648 194,570 
4,073,105 
4,073,105 
3,322,364 
3,288,930 
568,000 1,432,000 1,557,000 4,901,000 
385,196 130,609 323,470 2,165,207 
-220,000 
- 137,705 
730,000 
714,452 
489,000 410,000 517,000 
493,814 388,534 519,392 
220,00022 
137,48322 
4,609,4831" 
4,609,4831" 
7,920,641 
4,540,908 
* Total adjusted to correct discrepancies in prior years. 
1 Includes $1,950,906 for 30 and 37 foot projects. 
2 Includes $55,809 for new work flnds expended on previous project. 
3 Includes $2,489,173 for new work for previous projects, 
$105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 
adjustment new work toDelaware River, Philadelphia to Sea 
project from this project under 1954 modification. 
4 Includes $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects, 
and $685,0OOJobs Bill Funds. 
Excludes $12,976,054 for new work for previous projects 
and $142,015 adjustment from Delaware River, Philadelphia 
to Trenton, NJ under 1954 modification. 
6. Includes $1,285 for reconnaissance and condition 
surveys in FY 1957, $1,792 Operations and Maintenance 
cost incurred for preperation of enviroumental impact 
statement, and $48,000 expended for maintenance on 
previous projects. 
7. Excludes $4 12,400 spent for Continueing Authority 
project. 
8 Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous projects. 
9. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects. 
and $9,500 Job Bill Funds. 
10 Includes $50,000 Navy Department Funds. 
I 1. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds. 
12. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department Funds expended for 
maintenance. 
13. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 
14. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project, and 
$206,177 emergency relief funds. 
15. Includes $40,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under 
Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 
16. Includes $63,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under 
Code 710 Recreation Facilities, excluded $23,600 
preauthorization studies under 1948 modification. 
17. Excludes $213,336 spent on Continuing Authority project. 
18. Excluded $10,000 for previous projects. 
19. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects, and 
$8,000 Jobs Bill funds. 
20. Includes $704,000 AE&D. 
21. Excludes $85,000 cash and $130,000 services furnished 
during preconstruction planning. 
22. Includes $112,000 for work done for the State of New Jersey. 
23. Includes $757 new work funds expended on previous project. 
24. Includes $36,000 for new work for previous projects. 
25. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 
26. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previouse projects. 
3-21 
SEPT. 30. 1995 - -r - -- L =.,.,

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 3-B 
Acts 
Aug 30, 1935 
Aug 26, 1937 
July 24, 1946 
July 2, 1985 
Oct 27, 1990 
Mar 2, 1907 
Aug 26, 1937 
print 
Mar 2, 1907 
Mar 2, 1945 
July 3, 1930 
Aug 30, 1935 
Aug 30, 19352 
Aug 26,1937 
July 24, 1946 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Work Authorized 
BARNEGAT INLET, NJ (See Section 1 of Text) 
An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek 
Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through 
outer bar and for jetties. 
A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from 
gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep 
water in bay. 
Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet 
channel with Barnegat City Harbor. 
Construction of a parallel, 4270 foot rubble mound 
south jetty and dredging a channel 10 feet deep, 300 
feet wide, and 11,300 feet long. 
CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL 
ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE 
(See Section 2 of Text) 
The replacement of the U.S. Route 13 
bridge near St. Georges, DE, and the state may be 
reimbursed if it carries out the work 
COHANSEY RIVER, NJ (See Section 3 of Text) 
Channel 7 feet deep over entire project. 
Channel 12 feet deep to Glass Street, thence 8 feet 
to Commerce Street turning basin. 
COLD SPRING INLET, NJ (See Section 4 of Text) 
An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. 
A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor 
DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, 
PA AND TRENTON, NJ (See Section 5 of Text) 
A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between 
Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA and Delair Bridge 
Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, 
NJ, and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper 
end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge 
at Ferry St., Trenton. 
Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington 
Island. 
A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, NJ 
Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek 
Documents 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 19, 
73d Con.,2d seass.' 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc.85, 
74th Con.,2d sess.' 
H. Doc.358,79th Cong 
2d sess. 
H. Doc.236,99th Cong 
2d sess. 
WRDA 1990 
H. Doc.645, 59th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Senate Committee 
75th Cong., Ist sess. 
H. Doc.388,59th Cong., 
2nd sess. 
H. Doc.262,77th Cong., 
Ist sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 3, 
71st Cong., Ist sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 1 1, 
73d Cong., Ist sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 66, 
74th Cong., 1st sess' 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 90, 
74th Cong.,2d sess. 
H. Doc. 679, 79th 
3-22 
rS rr sirNNj 
...

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 
TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Wnrt AithnrrnmtI lnsm.ente 
Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 358, 83d 
Cong., 2d sess.' 
A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between 
Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA, and upstream end 
of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton 
Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. 
Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and 
suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary 
bank protection works; and eliminate authorized 
anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, PA 
June 25, 1910 
July 3, 1930 
Aug 30, 19353 
June 20, 1938' 
Mar 2, 1945' 
Mar 2, 1945' 
Mar 2, 1945' 
Sept 3, 1954 
July 3, 1958 
March 2, 1919 
July 3, 1930 
March 2, 1945 
DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA 
TO THE SEA (See Section 6 of Text) 
Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., 
Philadelphia, PA to Delaware Bay. 
Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantua 
Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, NJ and 
extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to 
Horseshoe Bend. 
An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, PA 
A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia - Camden 
Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep 
water in Delaware Bay. 
A 37-foot depth channel from Allegheny Ave., 
Philadelphia, PA to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge 
A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near 
Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. 
Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia 
Navy Yard. 
A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet 
deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel 
through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through 
Horseshoe Bend. 
Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus 
Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet 
wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200,13,650 and 
1 1,500 feet respectively. 
DELAWARE RIVER VICINITY OF CAMDEN, NJ 
(See Section 7 of Text) 
A depth of 30 feet from Newton Creek 
to Kaighn Point, thence 18 feet to Cooper Point. 
Extending the 30-foot depth upstream to Berkely Street 
terminal. 
A depth of 37 feet in front of the Camden Marine terminal 
Doe. 733, 61st 
Cong, 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 304, 71st Cong. 
2d sess.' 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc.5, 73d 
Cong., Ist sess. 
S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong. 
3d sess.' 
H. Doec. 580,76th Cong. 
Ist sess. 1 
H. Doec. 340, 77th Cong. 
1st sess. 1 
Specified in Act. 
H. Doe. 358, 83rd Cong. 
2d sess.' 
H. Doec. 185, 85th Cong. 
Ist sess. 
74th Cong., 1st sess.' 
H. Doc. 1120, 63d 
Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 111, 70th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doec. 353, 77th Cong., 
3-23 
Sept 3, 1954 
11 W VT vI n [1UII 1I 1g W1 v a IcW 

TABLE 3-B 
Acts 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Work Authorized Documents 
Oct 20, 1988 
Aug 26, 1937 
Mar 2, 1945 
Aug 30, 1935 
A depth of 40 feet in front of the Camden Marine terminal 
INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE (See Section 8 of Text) 
A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 
6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep 
water in the bay and authority to modify interior 
inlet channel. 
A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including 
basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at 
Millsboro. 
INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER 
TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD (See Section 9 of Text) 
A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from 
Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down 
Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or 
near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over 
canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 
feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth 
and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; 
enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 
400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; 
extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. 
Aug 7, 1939 
Sept 3, 1954 
Aug 30, 1935 
July 25, 1912 
Aug 30, 1935 
Mar 2, 1945 
June 25, 1910 
August 30, 1935 
Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge 
at or near St. Georges. 
A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from 
Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay. 
For an 8-foot depth and width increased to 150 feet 
in Delaware Bay. 
INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY 
TO DELAWARE BAY, DE 
(See Section 10 of text) 
For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and 
Delaware Bay. 
For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, 
for widening the canal from Broadkill River to 
Lewes and basin. 
For a 10-foot depth from Delaware Bay to Lewes and 
in basin, and for extending jetties. 10 
MAURICE RIVER, NJ (See Section 11 of Text) 
A 7-foot depth over entire project, with turning basin. 
An 8 foot depth, and width increased to 150 feet in Delaware Bay. 
Public Law 310, 76th 
Cong., Ist sess. 
S. Doc. 123, 83d Cong. 
2d sess.' 
H.Doc.275,73d Cong. 
2d sess.'. 
H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong. 
1st sess. and Rivers 
and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 51, 
61st Cong., 3d sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 56, 
75th Cong., 2st sess.' 
H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., 
1st sess.' 
H. Doc. 664, 59th Cong. 
1st sess.' 
H.Doc 275, 
73dCong., 2d sess.' 
3-24 
Ist CesS. 
WRDA 1988 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 41, 
75th Cong. Ist sess. 
H. Doc. 330,76th 
Cong., Ist sess.' 
H. Doc. 201, 72d Cong., 
I st sess. and Rivers 
and Harbors 
Committee Does. 18 
and 24, 736 Cong., 
2d sess.' 
-- 
a v- v

TABLE 3-B 
Acts 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Work Authorized 
Mar 2, 1912 
Aug 26, 1937 
Sept 3, 1954 
July 13, 1982 
July 1, 1945 
To increase the depth of the 2,000, foot reach of the 
Waterway in Cape May County to 15 feet. 
MISPILLION RIVER, DE (See Section 12 of Text) 
A 6-foot depth and extention of south. 
Extention of north jetty. 
A channel 9 feet deep, 80 feet wide from like depth in Delaware Bay to 
the landward end of the jetties and thence 60 feet wide to Milford, including 
3 cutoffs, with a turning basin at Milford. 
MURDERKILL RIVER, DE (See Section 13 of Text) 
A channel 7 feet deep at low water from Frederica 
to the 7 foot curve in Delaware Bay, 80 feet wide 
down to the mouth, and 150 feet wide at bottom and 
250 feet wide at top from the mouth to the 7 foot 
curve in the bay. Embankment of dredged material 
on each side to a height of at least 2 feet above high spring tides. 
NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY 
(See Section 14 of Text) 
A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 
generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic 
Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above 
Cape May, NJ. Construction of a canal of similar 
dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via 
the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at 
the Delaware Bay entrance. 
WRDA of 1986 
July 3, 1930 
Aug 30, 1935 
Nov 17, 1986 
Aug 8, 1917 
July 3, 1930 
July 24, 1946 
SALEM RIVER, NJ (See Section 15 of Text) 
A channel of 10-foot depth from Delaware River Masters Sand Plant 
Extention of project to Clements Bridge. 
A channel of 20-foot depth 
SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA (See Section 16 of Text) 
Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point 
thence 30 feet, 26, and 22 feet to University 
Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. 
A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the 
mouth and the conditional restoration and 
maintenance of the channel belowPassyunk Ave., 
channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and' 
by the United States. 
A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware 
River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project 
channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and 
University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire 
project. 
H. Doc. 217, 70th 
Cong. 
Ist Sess.' 
Rivers and Harbors Comm. 
Doc. 15 73d Cong., 
1st sess.' 
WRDA of 1986" 
H. Doc. 1270, 64th 
Cong., Ist sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 40, 
71st Cong., 2d sess' 
H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., 
2d Sess' 
3-25 
flnuu m s. t 
H. Doc. 678, 62d Cong. 
2d sess." 
Rivers and Harbor 
Comm., Doc. 83 
S.Doc 229, 81st 
Cong., 2d sess." 
H.Ex.Doc. 21, 52d Cong., 
Ist Sess. (See page 981 
Annual Report of 1892.) 
H.Doc. 133,76th Cong., 
Ist Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc.525 
79th Cong., 2d sess. 
Nov 17, 1986 
-- _ 
.UUL...i. i

TABLE 3-B 
A , 
CTLs 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Work Authorized 
June 25,1910 
Mar 2, 1945 
June 13,1902 
Mar 3, 1905 
June 3,1896 
July 25,1912 
Sep 22,1922 
July 3,1930 
Aug 30, 19358 
Oct 17, 1940 
July 14, 1960 
Nov 17, 1986 
TOMS RIVER, NJ (See Section 17 of Text) 
For 5-foot depth in river and forks 
For 12-foot depth in river and South Fork, including 
a turning basin, and 5 foot depth in North Fork 
TUCKERTON RIVER, NJ (See Section 18 of Text) 
For depths of 6,5 and 3 feet. 
Substitution of channel as across Little Tuckerton Bay. 
WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE (See Section 19 of Text) 
Depths of 21,10 and 7 feet and jetties. 
Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries 
including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of 
project. 
Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and 
construction by local interests of new south jetty. 
A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell 
Canal and modification or removal of a portion of 
north jetty. 
Completion of new south jetty by the United States 
subject to provision that city of Wilmington 
reimburse the United States for cost, without 
interest, of any part of structure that may 
subsequently be occupied and utilized for city 
activities. 
Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington 
of any part of south jetty for city activities 
under revocable license, provided occupied portion 
of jetty is properly maintained without expense to 
the United States. 
A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel 
and Lobdell Canal including turning basin of same 
depth, opposite Wilmington Marine Terminal, 200 feet 
wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 
2,000 feet long on north side of basin. 
CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ 
(See Section 21 of Text) 
Consists of beach fill; dune fill; new groins; main 
tenance of existing groins; rehabilitation of an 
existing seawall; and a breakwater with weir and 
deposition basin at Cape May Inlet. 
Project may be constructed separately or in combination 
with any other feature of the project. 
H. Doc. 346, 60th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 393, 7th Cong., 
1st sess. 
(Contains latest pulbished 
maps) 
H. Doec. 274, 56th Cong., 
Ist sess. 
Specified in act. 
(H. Doc. 1040, 
64th Cong., Ist sess.) 
H. Doc. 66, 54th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Annual Report, 1897 
p. 12501 
H. Doc. 359, 62d Cong., 
2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 
Ist sess. and S. 
Committee Print, 68th 
Cong., Ist sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 20, 
71st Cong. 2d sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 32 
73d Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., 
3rd sess. 
H. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., 
2d sess. 
Rivers & Harbors 
Act of 1968 
WRDA of 1986 
3-26 
_ - " a- v Documents-

TABLE 3-B 
Acts 
Nov 17, 1986 
Nov 17, 1986 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Work Authorized 
DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION (See Section 22 of Text) 
Provides for Federal participation in the cost 
of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, 
not to exceed 10 years, of the shore from Rehoboth 
Beach to Indian River Inlet. 
Project is modified to authorized the construction 
of sand bypass facilities and stone revetment erosion 
control measures at Indian River Inlet, DE. 9 
GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ 
(See Section 23 of Text) 
Project may be constructed separately or in 
combination with any other feature of the project. 
Documents 
H. Doc.90, 90th Cong 
2nd sess. 
WRDA of 1986 
Sec. 869 
River and Harbor Act of 
1965. WRDA of 1986. 
Consists of providing initial beachfill, with 
subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum 
berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet 
above mean low water. 
BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA (See Section 24 of Text) 
Provides for multiple-purpose development for water 
supply flood control and recreation 
BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA (See Section 25 of Text) 
Provides for multiple purpose development for water 
supply, flood, control, and recreation. Site is 
located on Tulpehocken Creek about 1 1/2 miles upstream 
from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 
six miles northwest of Reading, PA. 
FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA (See Section 28 of Text) 
Provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir 
Provides for a multiple-purpose development for 
water supply and recreation. 
GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA 
(See Section 29 of Text) 
A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a 
capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth 
embankment. 
MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NJ (See Section 32 of Text) 
Modify Channel with a total length of 2.5 miles miles. 
Channel will include both trapezoidal channel sections and walled 
sections. Five bridges will be replaced and one building will removed. 
PROMPTON LAKE, PA (See Section 35 of Text) 
Provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. 
Provides for multiple-purpose development for water 
supply and recreation in addition to present singlepurpose 
flood control project. 
H. Doc.522, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc 587, 79th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc 522,87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc 113, 80th Cong., 
1st sess. 
WRDA of 1986 
H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 
Ist sess. 
H. Doc 522, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
3-27 
Nov 17, 1986 
w

TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Wonrk Aulthnrized 
i. Contains latest published maps. 
2. Also Public Works AdministrationSeptember 6,1933, and Emergency 
Relief Administration,May 28, 1935 
3. Also Public Works Administration 
4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Naval Base to 
Philadelphia-Camden Bridge,deferred for restudy. 
5. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide fromPhiladelphia-Camden Bridge 
to Allegheny Ave. deferred for restudy. 
6. Extension of jetties considered to be active. 
7. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 
8. Also May 28,1935, under Emergency Relief Administration. 
9. Deauthorized the remaining portion of the project. 
10. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 
11. Contains latest published maps. 
3-28 
fniunenusI513 
I - 
f T~uvis � r LUIL yi Ai % iFv ,l u 
Arts

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 
TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Cost to September 30, 1995 
See Annual Operation and 
Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Absecon Creek, NJ 
Absecon Inlet, NJ 
Alloway Creek, NJ 
Appoquinimink River,DE 
Big Timber Creek, NJ 
Broadkill River, DE 
Cedar Creek, Sussex City, DE 
Cooper River, NJ' 
Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ 
Double Creek, NJ' 
Harbor of Refuge 
Inland Waterway from Chincoteague 
Bay to Delaware Bay 
Little River, DE 
Manasquan River, NJ20 
Mantua Creek, NJ 
Delaware Bay to Millville 
Millville fixed bridge to upper 
end of project 
**Neshaminy State Park 
Harbor, PA 
Oldmans Creek, NJ 
**Pepper Creek, DE 
Raccoon Creek, NJ 
St. Jones River, DE 
Delaware Bay to Lebanon'" 
Jetties and entrance at mouth 
Schuylkill River above 
Fairmount Dam, PAl 
Smyma River, DE 
Delaware River to Wharf at 
Smyrna Landing" 
Wharf at Smyrna Landing to 
fixed bridge. 
Waterway from Indian River Inlet 
to Rehoboth Bay, DE 
Woodbury Creek, NJ' 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
SEE TABLE 3-F 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
SEE TABLE 3-F 
COMPLETED 
COMPLETED 
1989 
1990 
1989 
1934 
1989 
1976 
1993 
1989 
1912 
1912 
1981 
1980 
1994 
1966 
1968 
1941 
1989 
1994 
1961 
1955 
1949 
1991 
1940 
11,935 
534,20916 
21,398 
36,973 
58,6652 
68,228 
256,100 
33,102 
256,624 
7,800 
5,162,230's 
168,412" 
12,016 
169,687 
143,98413 
128,20314 
31,188 
138,094's 
83,66522 
207,102 
4,291,810 
198,844 
27,09310 
84,186 
5 ,9 8 5 17 3 'z 
55,117 
41,270 
71,925' 
243,641 
310,738 
396,528* 
5 
1,169,01419 
98,36012 
288,310 
4,027,834 
339,340* 
161,913 
54,601 
32,125 
38,988' 
368,001 
66,093 
4 
197,327 
328,634 
56,474 
3-29

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Cost to September 30, 1995 
See Annual Operation and 
Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Alloway Creek' INACTIVE 1931 21,398 35,761 
Aquatic Plant Control INACTIVE 1975 87,594 - 
Dennis Creek, NJ' INACTIVE 1897 4,701 - 
Goshen Creek, NJ' INACTIVE 1905 15,359 870 
Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA"6 INACTIVE 1928 208,964 14,336 
Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE",6 INACTIVE 1898 224,704 - 
Leipsic River, DE' INACTIVE 1931 36,956 32,345 
Little Egg Harbor, NJ'"
3 INACTIVE _-' 15,048 - 
Maurice River, NJ-Channel 8 feet 
deep, Delaware Bay to mouth INACTIVE 1948 - - 
For Last 
Full Report Cost to September 30, 1995 
See Annual Operation and 
Deferred Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
St. Jones River, DE 1961 -- 
Delaware Bay to Lebanon" 8 - 207,102 66,093 
Jetties and new entrance at 
mouth 9 DEFERRED - - 
Toms River, NJ SEE TABLE 3-F - - 
Channel 12 feet deep DEFERRED - - 
1. Completed. 
2. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 
3. Abandonment recommended in House Doc. 467, 69th Congress, lst Sess. 
4. Maintenance assumed by local interests. 
5. Harbor not now required by commerce. 
6. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand 
relative to work done. 
7. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. 
8. Includes $54,590 new work and $28,935 maintenance funds expended on 
previous projects. 
9. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on 
previous projects. 
10. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. 
11. Entire amount expended on previous projects repealed in 1905. 
12. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for maintenance 
for previous project. 
13. Includes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 
14. Excludes $327,957 contributed funds allotted expended for new work. 
15. Excludes $38,988 non-Federal funds. 
16. Includes $116,497 for new work on previous projects. 
17. Includes $2,489,173 for maintenance for previous projects. 
18. Includes $2,749,452 for new work for previous projects. 
19. Excludes $1,089 for reconnaissance and condition surveys fiscal year 1963. 
20. 9 foot turning basin is considered inactive. 
22. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. 
23. Includes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 
24. Includes $555,600 for previous project. 
25. 10 & 12 foot anchorages are considered deauthorized. 
* Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of 
environmental impact statements. 
** Projects authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 
3-30

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 
OTHER AUTHORIZED 
TABLE 3-D BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Cost to September 30,1995 
See Annual Operation and 
Projieect Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Brigantine Island INACTIVE* -- - - 
Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ INACTIVE* 1978 314,400 - 
Long Beach Island INACTIVE* - - - 
Townsends Inlet and Seven Mile 
Beach, NJ INACTIVE* - - - 
* NO CURRENT YEAR FUNDS. 
OTHER AUTHORIZED 
TABLE 3-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Cost to September 30, 1995 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Allentown, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1961 1,615,581 -1 
Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1966 4,520,995 -- 
Mt. Holly, NJ COMPLETED 1946 283,655 -1 
Pottstown, PA ACTIVE 1984 487,366 - 
Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA INACTIVE 1984 335,299 - 
Tamaqua, PA ACTIVE 1990 628,4672 - 
1. Maintenance assumed by local interest as required by authorizing project. 
2. Transferred from Baltimore District in FY 1989. 
3-31

REPORT OF THE SECRECTARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 3-F DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last Full Date Federal Contributed 
Report See Annual And Funds Funds 
Navigation Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended 
Appoquinimink River, DE' 1931 3 Oct 78 
HD 95-351 $78,243 - 
Atlantic City, NJ 1972 HD 538 
918 $2,083,289 - 
Barnegat Light, NJ 1964 HD 208 
918 $70,908 - 
Cape May City, NJ 1961 3 Sep 54 
HD 206 
918 $22,9578 - 
Delaware County, PA 1931 PL 99-662 52 Stat. 
323 $7,139 - 
Long Beach Island, NJ 1964 14 Jul 60 
HD 208 
918 $40,665 - 
Ocean City, NJ 1969 HD 184 
918 $395,831 to 
Rehoboth Beach to Indian River 1965 HD 216 
Inlet, DE 918 $326,116 - 
For Last Full Date Federal Contributed 
Report See Annual And Funds Funds 
Beach Erosion Projects Report For 
Herefolbrd Inlet 
Maurice River, NJ.I 
Millville fixed bridge to upper 
end of project2 
Oldmans Creek, NJ 
Rancocas River, NJ4 
Smyrna River, DE 5 
Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed 
bridge. 
Flood Control Projects 
1978 
1948 
1941 
1942 
1949 
For Last Full 
Report See Annual 
Report For 
Section 12 PL 93-251 
Section 12 PL 93-251 
2 Nov 79 
Section 12 PL 93-251 
2 Nov 79 
Section 12 PL 93-251 
2 Nov 79 
HD 95-157 
Date 
And 
Authority 
$314,400 
$63,313 
$57,590 
$396,169 
Federal 
Funds 
Expended 
Aquashicola Reservoir, PA 
Delaware River, Mouth of 
Neversink 
Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA' 
1963 
1917 
1966 
17 Nov 86 
PL 99-662 46 Stat. 
918 
Chester River, 
5 Aug 77 
HD 94-192 
2 Nov 79 
Section 12 PL 93-251 
3-32 
Authority Expended Expended 
Contributed 
Funds 
Expended 
17 Nov 86 
17 Nov 86 
$4,520,995

PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 
DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last Full Date 
Flood Control Projects 
Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA 
Tocks Island, PA,NJ,and NY 9 
Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. 
Route 209 only) IPA9 
Trexler Lake, PA 
Report See Annual 
Report For 
1963 
1979 
1979 
1981 
And 
Authority 
17 Nov 86 
PL 99-662 46 Stat. 
918 
23 Oct 62 
PL 87-874 
23 Oct 62 
PL 87-874 
17 Nov 86 
Federal 
Funds 
Expended 
Contributed 
Funds 
Expended 
65,106,26010 
$195,223 
PL 99-662 76 Stat. 
1180 - - 
I. Includes $36,973 new work, and $41,270 for maintenance. 
2. There is no need now for this portion of the project. 
3 Includes $31,188 new work, and $32,125 for maintenance. 
4. Includes $44.500 new work, and $13,090 for maintenance. 
5 Includes $143,759 new \work, $55,085 previous project, $174,602 for 
maintenance, and S22,723 maintenance, previous project. 
6 Maintenance assumed by local interest. 
7. Excludes $58 585 accelera:ted Public 11 May 1964. Work funds expended 
for extension. 
8. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public 11 May 1964. Work funds 
expended for extention. 
9. National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 terminated Corps authority to 
proceed with project. Legislation would be required to proceed with 
the project. 
10. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests and $272,766 Federal 
participation expended under extention of five existing groins completed 
11 May 1964. 
3-33 
TABLE 3-F 
--- ..

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT *
This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna 
River and its tributaries from headwaters in south 
central New York State through central Pennsylvania 
to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the 
Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in 
Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and Northern Virginia 
to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; 
and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that 
portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of 
Smith Point, MD, on western shore of the bay, and 
includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake 
Bay and Atlantic Ocean. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, 
MD and VA..................................... ...... 4-3 
2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, 
Collection and Removal of Drift.....................4-4 
3. Broad Creek, MD ....................................... 4-4 
4. Chester River, MD ....................................... 4-4 
5. Crisfield Harbor, MD..................................... 4-5 
6. Fishing Creek, MD.................................. .... 4-5 
7. Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, MD...............4-5 
8. Herring Creek, Tall Timbers, MD ........................ 4-5 
9. Honga River and Tar Bay, MD ............................ 4-6 
10. Island Creek, MD................................... ..... 4-6 
11. Knapps Narrows, MD..................................... 4-6 
12. Little Wicomico River, VA......................... .............. 4-7 
13. Nanticoke River, MD ..................................... 4-7 
14. Nanticoke River, DEL and MD ............................. 4-7 
15. Neabsco Creek, VA ..................................... 4-8 
16. Northeast River, MD ..................................... 4-8 
17. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and 
Sinepuxent Bay, MD................................... 4-8 
18. Pocomoke River, MD.................................... 4-9 
19. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection 
and Removal of Drift ........................................ 4-9 
20. Potomac River - Aquatic 
Plant Control, MD, VA, and DC ........................ 4-9 
21. Prevention of Obstructions 
and Injurious Deposits, MD ............................ 4-10 
22. Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD.............................4-10 
23. Tilghman Island Harbor, MD ............................. 4-10 
24. Washington Harbor, DC......................................4-10 
25. Wicomico River, MD ..................................... 4-11 
26. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............. 4-11 
27. Navigation Work under Special 
Authorization ................................................. 4-11 
Beach Erosion Control 
28. Beach Erosion Control Work 
under Special Authorization ........................... 4-12 
29. Atlantic Coast of Maryland ................................. 4-12 
30. Colonial Beach, VA ..................................... 4-12 
31. Town of North Beach, VA....................................4-12 
32. 
33. 
34. 
35. 
36. 
37. 
37A. 
38. 
39. 
40. 
41. 
42. 
43. 
44. 
45. 
46. 
46A. 
46B. 
46C. 
46D. 
46E. 
46F. 
46G. 
46H. 
461. 
46J. 
46K. 
46L. 
46M. 
46N. 
47. 
Flood Control Page 
Anacostia River and Tributaries, 
Flood Protection and Navigation 
Improvements, DC & MD...............................4-13 
Broad Top Region, PA................................. 4-13 
Chesapeake Bay Oyster 
Recovery, MD ....................................... 4-13 
Cumberland MD, and Ridgeley, WV...................4-13 
Jennings Randolph Lake, 
M D and W V......................................................4-14 
Lackawanna River Basin, PA ............................. 4-14 
Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA................................4-14 
Lock Haven, PA ........................................ 4-14 
Moorefield, WV ......................................... 4-15 
Olyphant, Lackawanna River, PA ...................... 4-15 
Paxton Creek, Harrisburg, PA............................4-15 
Petersburg, WV................................... ..... 4-16 
Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, 
Juniata River, PA .......................................... 4-16 
Scranton, Lackawanna River, PA......................4-16 
South Central Environmental 
Restoration Infrastructure and 
Resource Protection Development 
Pilot, PA ..................................... ....... 4-16 
Southern New York Flood 
Control Projects ...................................... 4-17 
Addison, NY ..................................... ....... 4-17 
Almond Lake, NY......................................4-17 
Arkport Dam, NY...............................................4-17 
Avoca, NY............................................ ........... 4-17 
Binghamton, NY ........................................ 4-18 
Canisteo, NY ..................................... ...... 4-18 
Corning, NY ..................................... ..... 4-18 
East Sidney Lake, NY .......................... 4-19 
Elmira, NY ...................................... ...... 4-19 
Hornell, NY ..................................... ..... 4-19 
Lisle, N Y ............................................................. 4-20 
Oxford, NY ....................................... ...... 4-20 
Whitney Point Lake, NY ..................................... 4-20 
Whitney Point Village, NY .................................. 4-20 
Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna 
River, PA ............................ 4-20 
4-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Flood Control (cont'd) Page 
48. Susquehanna River Flood Control 
Projects, NY and PA ..................................... 4-21 
48A. Cowanesque Lake, PA........................................4-21 
48B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA ................................ 4-21 
49. West Branch of Susquehanna 
R iver, PA .............................. ...................... .4-22 
49A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA .................................... 4-22 
49B. Curwensville Lake, PA.......................................4-22 
49C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA...........................4-22 
50. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising) .............. 4-23 
51. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA........4-23 
52. Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects ............................................. 4-23 
53. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir 
Operations ....................................................... 4-23 
54. Flood Control Work under Special 
Authorization .................................................. 4-23 
Water Supply 
55. Washington Aqueduct ....................................... 4-24 
56. 
57. 
58. 
General Investigations Page 
Surveys................... ........... ............................. 4-24 
Collection and Study of Basic Data....................4-24 
Pre-construction Engineering and 
Design .......... ........ ...................... 4-24 
Tables 
Table 4-A Cost and Financial Statement...............4-25 
Table 4-B Authorizing Legislation ........................... 4-32 
Table 4-C Other Authorized 
Navigation Projects .............................. 4-40 
Table 4-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion 
Control Projects ..................................... 4-42 
Table 4-E Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects .................................. 4-42 
Table 4-F Not Applicable 
Table 4-G Deauthorized Projects .............................. 4-44 
Table 4-H Reconnaissance and 
Condition Surveys ............................. 4-46 
Table 4-I Inspection of 
Completed Projects.......................... 4-47 
4-2

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
Navigation 
L BALTIMORE HARBOR AND 
CHANNELS, MD AND VA 
Location. Baltimore Harbor is at the head of the navigable 
portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from 
Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near the town 
of Westminster in Carroll County, MD, and flows generally 
southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake 
Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278.) 
Existing project. 
a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between 
Cape Charles, VA, and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, MD, 
with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 
feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve 
in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a 
distance of 3.0 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep 
and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in 
Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.4 miles; 
(3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 
feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the 
Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance 
of 10.3 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach 
Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, 
widened at the approach and bends, from the 50-foot 
depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the 
Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a 
distance of 20.2 miles. 
b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) 
Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal 
Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 15.6 
miles long from the Cutoff Angle in the main channel to 
the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the 
east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland 
waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The 
channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan 
Point and Tolchester Channels; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet 
deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main 
channel to and including a turning basin at the head of 
Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep 
and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in 
Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington 
Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 
200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the 
marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) 
an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, 
adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 
15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22-foot 
channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a 
channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22-foot 
channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge 
to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, 
thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 
2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent 
to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the 
Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch; 
Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 
feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to 
Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.5 miles; and (5) Northwest 
Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep 
channels after either depth has been provided by local 
interests: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 
feet wide, and 1.0 mile long with a turning basin at the 
head of the channel from that depth existing at the time 
of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet 
deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.3 miles long with a turning 
basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing 
at the time of construction. 
c. The following anchorages: (1) Riverview Anchorage 
No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2,400 feet long, and 1,200 feet wide; 
(2) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet 
long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (3) Fort McHenry 
Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet 
wide. 
The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry 
Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the 
Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill 
Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort 
McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper 
Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. 
Estimated cost for new work is $361,581,000 which 
includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the 
River and Harbor Act of 1945; $38,411,000 for work 
completed under the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of 
which $33,991,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. 
Coast Guard and $4,360,000 is non-Federal; and 
$314,840,000 (October 1989 prices) for work authorized by 
the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $460,000 is 
U.S. Coast Guard and $314,380,000 is Corps of Engineers 
and non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full 
on page 4-3 of Fiscal Year 1982 Annual Report. 
Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 
miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially 
developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers 
for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 
general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk 
cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 
53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general 
merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of 
storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage 
space. Eight ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling 
yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The 
two grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 8 
million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities 
is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1991)" on Port of 
Baltimore, MD, (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers 
and Harbors). 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work, Baltimore District: Studies for completing the 
remaining new work under the River and Harbor Act of 
1958, widening the Connecting Channel (Brewerton 
Channel Eastern Extension) from 450 to 600 feet wide, 
were initiated and in progress at the end of the fiscal year. 
New Work, Norfolk District: None. 
Maintenance, Baltimore District: Condition surveys 
of the project channels were made. Maintenance dredging, 
by contract, of the Cutoff Angle, Brewerton Channel, 
Brewerton Angle, Ft. McHenry Channel, and Curtis 
Creek Channel commenced on October 18, 1994 and was 
completed on January 12, 1995. Approximately 1,905,100 
cubic yards of material were dredged and deposited in the 
4-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
approved Hart-Miller Island containment facility in the 
Cheapeake Bay at a cost of $9,391,972. A contract in the 
amount of $10,799,250 was awarded on August 10, 1995, 
to dredge an estimated $2.3 million cubic yards of material 
from the Craighill Channel and Brewerton Channel 
Eastern Extension and deposit the material in the 
approved Hart-Miller Island containment facility in the 
Chesapeake Bay. Work was in progress at the end of the 
fiscal year. 
Maintenance, Norfolk District: Condition surveys of 
the York Spit and Rappahannock Shoal Channels were 
made. Maintenance dredging, by contract of the Cape 
Henry Channel commenced on February 20, 1995 and was 
completed on May 17, 1995. A total of 678,366 cubic yards 
of material were dredged from the Cape Henry Channel 
and deposited in the approved Dam Neck Ocean Placement 
Area in the Atlantic Ocean at a cost of $2,137,231. 
2. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD, 
COLLECTION AND REMOVAL 
OF DRIFT 
Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, MD, 
and its tributaries. 
Existing project. Provides for collection and removal 
of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, 
and authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot such 
amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations 
for maintenance and improvement of existing river 
and harbor works or other available appropriations, and 
that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct 
project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of 
work is to afford relief from variable conditions of 
obstruction. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. See Section 1 of this text. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection 
and disposal of 17,280 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging 
from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 
3. BROAD CREEK, MD 
Location. This is a tidal waterway, connecting 
Pocomoke Sound and Little Annemessex River, MD. The 
north end of Broad Creek is 1.8 miles south of Crisfield. It 
lies north and south, is about 2 1/2 miles in length, and 
traverses a low, marshy region, the level of which is only 
slightly above high water. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic 
Survey Chart No. 1224.) 
Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 
6 feet deep at mean low water, 100 feet wide in the 
straight reaches, and 130 feet wide at the bends from the 
6-foot contour in Pocomoke Sound through Broad Creek to 
the 6-foot contour in Little Annemessex River, a distance 
of about 3 miles. The mean range of tide is 1.9 feet and 
the extreme tidal range is 3 feet under ordinary conditions. 
The Federal cost of new work for the completed 
project was $28,227. 
Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests 
are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance 
dredging. 
Terminal facilities. None. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
A maintenance dredging contract was awarded 
on September 25, 1995 to remove 21,000 cubic yards of 
material. 
4. CHESTER RIVER, MD 
Location. Rises in Kent County, DE, and flows 50 miles 
generally southwesterly and empties into the Chesapeake 
Bay. Kent Island Narrows is a passage connecting Chester 
River and Eastern Bay. Wells Cove is an indentation on 
the easterly side of Kent Island Narrows about 0.4 mile 
south of the highway bridge crossing the Narrows. (See 
Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 12266 and 12270.) 
Previous project. For details see page 262 of the 1960 
Annual Report. 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep at 
mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones 
Landing, section included in project is about 5.5 miles 
long with the lower end of the section being about 37 
miles above mouth of river; for a channel 7 feet deep at 
mean low water and 75 feet wide from Chester River to 
Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows; and a channel 
7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending 
from 7-foot deep curve in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet 
into Wells Cove with a basin of same depth and 300 feet 
square at head of channel. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. 
Cost of new work for completed project was $32,454, 
exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. 
Widening 7-foot deep channel from 75 to 100 feet from 
Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island 
Narrows was deauthorized and is excluded from the foregoing 
estimate. 
Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests 
are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance. 
Terminal facilities. There are two bulkhead wharves 
on Chester River section. Facilities on the Kent Island 
Narrows section of the existing project consist of about 
10,000 linear feet of timber pile bulkheaded wharf. About 
1,350 linear feet of the wharf is owned and operated by 
the Queen Anne's County; the remainder is privately 
owned. The privately owned bulkheaded wharf is operated 
mostly by the seven marinas located on the Narrows with 
the remainder being owned and operated by the seafood 
packing houses in the area. In addition to the slips of the 
marinas, there are marine railways, launching ramps, 
and travel-lifts. All of these facilities are in good condition 
and are located adjacent to the proposed improvements. 
In Wells Cove there is a small wharf, a small marine railway, 
and a public landing. All facilities are privately 
owned except the public landing on Wells Cove. Facilities 
are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
A maintenance dredging contract was solicited 
for bids. Excessive bid for the dredging resulted in cancellation 
of the solicitation. 
4-4

BALITIMORE, Mt) M STRt(If 
_ T BALTIMORIE, MD IST-CT . 
.r~~~L~11 ~r~ s tlrsAI~TPr. ._ar 
5.Lgig)t0l@Fl town of Crified 
o gL east bank f Little nn m sex ivr, an r 'I alno catOn. Aong west rn im i (Qe town ns f ole bo;inq, o'. .GasI sioeof f"(, ap. Re sati. ee 
on est e nme 1es iyver, an estuary of 
'Iangier ~und on east sine oIunesapeake Bay.. (SeS 
c Ef~f He uy42ge 279 o niin1ua 
iE.' cortr iob ru s19 6p2.r 9 ject. For details see page 279 of Annual 
gReg ect. A channel 12 feet ceep at mean low 
S 425 - fee.w 1 jf 4' o1 tde it curve in 
oc er eve enI uet on e eurv n 
an ler S ns tee0h. o nsnoc( 
ch onmen eice rouo oiCC,SLCJXer 
anl er und; to on in . eteet 
e wi0e e o ethu tnee w 't of l 
~e.(n &{41reet wce 0 a oo " a t ebth re ine 
a Oc . It rc ala ,J~ nn em xe a moo):- 
Annemesse a lavn er V nc or o" awan ~n. oau ct ce t 
a,6nr ouIi ar1 n 1c'elt o 1,0 1 ffltbadwi eD)<a 1 
Sn a er(1 U tr I a eron l 1jO( 0, ea (Jer am 
fet il ro in e te ae n nnt r o 
r ne te e w e ",rse a-. e aurvIn n Li ls 
{TreS tix:t11 ( i i'r nor 
nn emesse t er vi rreem crn e 
ac a o n er ooet mC fm'ee wiefro 
he rf er t wi r u nr i lnemss esswex ir 
wn. 1?n5 m0n to na s wer as ti 
thrge en te present ent rie a c t rn es om t oo 
O e.e c aVi cor fTm in tel cnc d reV 
buil u e i egm1i~ aa v erefn ' ol r s eicalri t 
eriesse r rs ar es arae pno tv io 
cove 10 ee , R bO 0 feet l wi n0afeetongr t 
n i oI e in1rItm r le 4 F m lV s e 
inpco cn forfuturanne i ntee na n e redgi . eela 
sn akes av os e e i is o o B t 
are aen t d m seLt n messex River 
o nsno p b Ris e -a 
rei 1hge aiepresent entra ceo noer cso Mean 
Ura.i. Su fu i4 @aeas tied i val v1 e n tor x t i iintl 
in con ftinfotur muture mntnnce dr 
Local cooeration Local r ' furnshed diposal 
st.e ii )(0_.El iir uar is 
h eqata c m ese. a eront or xri narlf ao 
oand reasAony) >tre 
an dt l in ,areae oSt whares are ivaL er ly. ined utc 
are oenh oeoe pu ticfor tra cton o Dusiness wit te 
ownersaFew or e tewrmlsl es u ioft Bacisaf reihmhandervices 
aut most outhrl nSpal ise . ( 
hand. T erngneerg t-e airegn WKar waemnIisna 
are adenuate for frese t and reasona r eg ng. l Callon, or trInli 14g1 l(l stream1 1 n e rs' 
an on omers ove for construction of auddition lter- 
S -erauo;n ara _ 'esu t s ": rin is al , ear., .. ntenance: 
ng2neering ana esign wor was accompished 
pleted project was $111,242. 
Eo ! inr, re ts arc h: ii' r b ispaS; ea. a: aeedef ,i 
,Loea colerauon, Cully complied with except that 
Iocal interests are to furnish disposal areas as needed for 
funii ets nfutsi osa a a a n ' 0 iii 
Sar are nva r oreote' t f ?9 i nra c 
c n~ari nnmg west rom ay snore, ana the .. Navy 
ep artmeni constructed a pile-and-timber wharf on west 
sijlt ns and results during fiscal yco Mr Mto 
encee. nineeri- and aes" wo.wa accm ld 
n a iu i uLr t " . .ear Mamntenance: 
ngineerinng ana aesign work ws accomplished 
in connection for future maintenance dredging. 
7. HERRIN( BAY AND 
7. flA#fifWH AFR 
o n�b e : 1. st d : i" i . ' I, .. " I--, ,_ t 3,,. ... . , , 
Locaton r ay s a wds - a n ut 1 a tiI 
on golj west s'det 4 ,of 'he ea a ao n, ep",e 
An a 11 ,It; S adot ni ,nxn l"P9 
o ring Bay, (See U.S. Coast and Gdetic. Survey 
roect. Provides for channel eet lep ani 
t)(, t e f.. a fro f mo cto int tmerrIlq~,2 v icinit' 
C Iounr oo ,r o o}h tQt ,n tI.ree pw i ytr g [pii 
same dept1ti u I Oeti 1I "nt riOee0 o n heao 
nhinl, d a synne bye9 watier m t 90, 
on# est fentrance ,chaneI Mean aisabout 
. feet and extreme tidrange about 4 et.Te Federal 
l cooperation. Fully met except locai interests 
ar to furni h disposal areas for future maintenance as 
e n t a.... .. . ..Q , ggtga 
penfftp a jt, oer with a fe pryat p g1 g a. 
fre igt-handling devices are instaled on any of 
the wharves which are considered ad .quate for exi ting 
co eraton and results during iscaf year. Maintenance:
napayment was made for fiscal year 1994 
maintenance dredging contract. 
8. I N CREEK 
shape 6 feet deep adjacent to the proposed public wharf, 
4-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
and riprap-stone jetties on the upstream and downstream 
sides of the entrance channel 770 and 650 feet long, 
respectively. The plane of reference is mean low water. 
The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.6 feet; irregular, 1.9 feet; 
and extreme, approximately 7 feet. The project was modified 
in 1986 under Section 111 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1968. The modification consists of constructing 250 
feet of beachfill, 2,187 linear feet of stone revetment and 
upgrading 350 linear feet of existing revetment along the 
Tall Timbers waterfront south of the project inlet to preclude 
shoreline erosion induced by the project jetties. 
Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement 
(LCA) includes the following provisions: 
1. Compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance 
and Real Property Acquisitions Policies Act of 1970. 
2. Provide without cost to the United States, when and as 
required all lands, easements, rights-of-way and soildisposal 
areas necessary for the construction and subsequent 
maintenance of the project. 
3. Hold and save the United States free from damages to 
other property resulting from the improvement. 
Terminal facilities. There are a number of small 
wharves and landings within the creek, all privately 
owned. The facilities are considered adequate for present 
commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Initiated study for project modification to more 
effectively prevent erosion downdrift of jetties. 
9. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD 
Location. Honga River is a tidal estuary of Chesapeake 
Bay and penetrates Dorchester County on Eastern 
Shore of Maryland between Hooper Island and the mainland; 
Tar Bay lies between Barren Island and the mainland 
and Hooper Island. Fishing Creek connects Tar Bay 
and Honga River. Back Creek is a branch of Honga River 
extending into Hooper Island; the mouth is about 2 miles 
south of Fishing Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey 
Chart 1224.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide 
and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot contour 
in Chesapeake Bay, through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek 
to the 7-foot contour in Honga River, 25,300 feet long, and 
a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from 
the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the 
head of Back Creek with a turning basin of the same 
depth 150 feet long and 200 feet wide at the head of channel, 
about 5,500 feet long. Mean range of tide is about 1.4 
feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project 
was $66,119. 
Local cooperation. Local interests furnished placement 
areas for future maintenance dredging. 
Terminal facilities. Numerous small private wharves 
are scattered along Fishing Creek and Back Creek. A 
public wharf is on Fishing Creek. A public wharf, four 
oyster houses, and a marine railway are on Back Creek. 
Facilities are adequate for existing and reasonable 
prospective commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
A maintenance dredging contract was awarded 
on September 19, 1995 to remove 164,000 cubic yards of 
material. 
10. ISLAND CREEK, MD 
Location. Island Creek in St. Marys County, MD, is a 
tidal estuary three-fourths of a mile long, flowing in a 
southeasterly direction and entering the right bank of St. 
Marys River at its junction with the Potomac River, 11 
miles upstream of the Chesapeake Bay and 97 miles 
downstream from Washington, DC. It lies entirely within 
the lower half of St. Georges Island. (See U.S. Coast and 
Geodetic Survey Chart 557.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep, 
50 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long from the St. Marys River 
through the entrance to Island Creek and a turning basin 
5 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long within the 
creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal 
ranges are: Mean, 1.5 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and 
extreme, approximately 7 feet. Costs of Federal new work 
for the completed project were $6,230. 
Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement 
was signed on May 10, 1995, with St. Mary's County, MD, 
which requires the local sponsor to provide all lands, easements, 
relocations, and rights-of-way necessary for construction 
of the project; hold and save the U.S. from 
potential damages; assure public ownership; and provide 
a 10 percent contribution toward the cost of construction. 
At the completion of construction, an additional 10 percent 
contribution must be provided by the local sponsor, 
however, any credits for lands, easements, relocations and 
rights-of-way may be applied against this contribution. 
Local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future 
maintenance as needed. 
Terminal facilities. On Island Creek there are five 
small private landings or stagings which are considered 
adequate for present commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: A contract for construction of the jetty was 
awarded August 29, 1995. Construction is proceeding on 
schedule and should be completed by February 1996. 
Operation and maintenance of the project will be a Federal 
responsibility. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging 
contract was completed on April 25, 1995. A total of 9,796 
cubic yards of material was removed. 
11. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD 
Location. A small channel separating Tilghman Island 
from mainland of eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay about 
40 miles south of Baltimore, MD. (See Coast and Geodetic 
Survey Chart 1225.) 
Existing project. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low 
water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends from deep 
water in Chesapeake Bay to deep water in Harris Creek, 
MD. Mean range of tide is 1.4 feet. Cost of new work for 
completed project was $46,121. Existing project channel 
4-6

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
was authorized by the Public Works Administration, September 
16, 1933, and later adopted by 1935 River and 
Harbor Act. 
Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests 
must furnish disposal areas as needed for future 
maintenance. 
Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf exists on each 
side of the southerly abutment of the bridge across the 
Narrows. There are several small-boat landings within 
the Narrows and several marine railways for repairing 
boats of a few feet in draft. A bulkhead landing is available 
for public use at the turning basin. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Engineering and design work was accomplished 
in connection for future maintenance dredging. 
12. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA 
Location. A tidal estuary 6 miles long in Northumberland 
County, VA, flowing southeasterly to Potomac River, 
which it enters on the right bank one-half mile upstream 
of its mouth and about 108 miles downstream from Washington, 
DC. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 
12233.) 
Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide, 
and 4,800 feet long, extending from deep water in the 
Potomac River to deep water in the Little Wicomico River; 
two stone jetties, extending to the 8-foot contour in 
Potomac River; and bulkhead walls from the inner ends 
thereof extending sufficiently into Little Wicomico River 
to stabilize the dredged inner channel. Plane of reference 
is mean low water. Tidal ranges in Potomac River at the 
entrance are: Mean 1.2 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and 
extreme, about 7 feet. Mean tidal range within the river is 
about 1 foot. Federal cost of new work for the completed 
project was $81,885, exclusive of $5,000 contributed by 
local interests. 
Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests 
are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance 
dredging. 
Terminal facilities. Two wharves open to the public 
and numerous small wharves and stagings for private 
use, an oyster shucking, and packing plant, and a marine 
railway and boat-building yard. Facilities are considered 
adequate for present commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
A maintenance dredging contract was completed 
on May 16, 1995. A total of 16,585 cubic yards of material 
was removed. 
13. NANTICOKE RIVER, MD 
Location. The Nanticoke River flows in a southwesterly 
direction to Tangier Sound, Chesapeake Bay, 
and is about 50 miles long. The town of Nanticoke, Md., is 
on the east side of the river, about 3 miles from the 
mouth, just north of Roaring Point. (See Coast and Geodetic 
Survey Chart 567.) 
Existing project. Provides for a small-boat harbor 7 
feet deep, 120 feet wide, and 400 feet long in the marsh at 
Nanticoke, with an entrance channel of the same depth 
and 60 feet wide, protected by twin stone jetties in the 
river, the north jetty being about 870 feet long and the 
south jetty being about 770 feet long. The mean range of 
tide is about 2.6 feet. The cost of new work for the completed 
project was $73,243. 
Local cooperation. Fully met except that local interests 
are to furnish placement sites as required for subsequent 
maintenance and guarantee the United States and 
its contractors against claims for damages to oyster beds 
attributable to subsequent maintenance. 
Terminal facilities. There are three privately owned 
wharves open to the general public. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Contract modification issued to settle Appeals 
Board ruling. 
14. NANTICOKE RIVER, DE AND MD 
Location. Headwaters of Nanticoke River consist of 
numerous branches rising mainly in the northern portion 
of Sussex County, DE. The river is about 50 miles long 
and flows southwesterly from its source to Tangier Sound. 
Northwest Fork is a branch of Nanticoke River which 
rises in Kent County, DE, and flows past Federalsburg, 
MD, generally southerly through Dorchester County, MD, 
to its junction with the main river opposite Riverton, MD. 
It is about 30 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey 
Chart 77.) 
Existing project. Nanticoke River: Channel 12 feet 
deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot depth curve in 
Tangier Sound to the highway bridge at Seaford, DE, with 
a turning basin at the upper end. Disjointed sections 
included in the project is about 4 miles long, extending 
over 32 miles of river; lower end of the first section of the 
project is about 8 miles above the mouth of the river. 
Mean range of tide is 3.4 feet, and the extreme tidal range 
is 4.3 feet. 
Northwest Fork: Dredging a channel 6 feet deep and 60 
feet wide at mean low water from upper Browns wharf to 
within one-half mile of the southern boundary of town of 
Federalsburg, with a turning basin at the upper end. Section 
included in the project is about 4 miles long, and its 
lower end is 11.75 miles above the mouth of the river. 
Mean range of tide is 2.6 feet. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish disposal 
areas for future maintenance dredging. 
Terminal facilities. Waterfront at Seaford consists 
largely of unconnected pile-and-timber bulkhead wharves 
with earthfills. One public wharf is used as a launching 
ramp. Remaining wharves are privately owned. A rail siding 
extends along a considerable portion of waterfront and 
offers facilities for interchange of rail and water traffic, 
Existing terminals are reasonably adequate for present 
and prospective commerce. 
Terminal facilities on Northwest Fork are all privately 
owned and open to general public use. They consist of one 
solid bulkhead wharf of 80-foot frontage and three land- 
4-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
ings each with 60-foot frontages. Depths of water are from 
2 to 8 feet. Landings are log revetments backed by earthfill 
and are in poor condition. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Engineering and design work was accomplished 
in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 
Surveys revealed shoaling was not sufficient to warrant 
dredging. 
15. NEABSCO CREEK, VA 
Location. A tidal estuary approximately three miles 
long, enters the west side of the Potomac River about 83 
miles above its mouth and about 27 miles south of Washington, 
D.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 560.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep 
and 50 feet wide from the Potomac River to the anchorage 
basin. The project was classified as inactive for many 
years. On September 2, 1966, Chief of Engineers reclassified 
the following portion from the inactive to the active 
category; a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep, from 
the Potomac River to the Richmond, Fredericksburg, and 
Potomac Railroad Bridge over Neabsco Creek and a channel 
upstream from the railroad bridge 60 feet wide and 6 
feet deep to an anchorage basin of the same depth 140 
feet wide and 150 feet long. On January 3, 1978, the Chief 
of Engineers reclassified this portion of the project to inactive 
category as local cooperation was lacking. The 1986 
Water Resource Development Act deauthorized the 
unconstructed 7 foot channel from the Potomac River to 
the Upper Landing. 
Local cooperation. The local interests must provide a 
suitable placement site for future maintenance dredging. 
Terminal Facilities. There are numerous privately 
owned piers along the waterway open to the public. 
Several repair facilities provide services to navigational 
interests. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Engineering and design work was accomplished 
in connection for future maintenance dredging. 
16. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD 
Location. A tidal waterway extending southwestward 
5.5 miles from the junction of its branches in the town of 
North East to the head of Chesapeake Bay, 6 miles north 
of entrance to the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. (See 
Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1226.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide 
and 7 feet deep at mean low water from that depth in 
river to foot of Church Street in the town of North East, 
enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide 
and 300 feet long. Mean range of tide is 2.25 feet. 
Local cooperation. Fully met except that local interests 
are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance 
as required. 
Terminal facilities. There are a few lightly constructed 
landings for small boats scattered along the waterfront in 
the town of North East. There are two fish-packing 
plants, two marine railways, several bulkhead wharves, 
11 marinas, and a number of small boathouses along the 
length of the waterway. Facilities are considered adequate 
for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Engineering and design work was accomplished 
in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 
17. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND 
INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD 
Location. Ocean City is on a barrier island between 
Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south 
of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic 
Survey Chart 12211.) 
Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 
200 feet wide and 10 feet deep through the inlet to the 
channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south 
side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 8.8 feet above 
mean low water and a top width of 18 feet, and on the 
north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet 
above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 
feet, thence generally 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep to the 
project harbor; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in 
Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 
100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 
feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a 
point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 
75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. The modification 
authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized 
in December 1989. This work included 16 and 
14 foot depth channels with widths from 300 to 100 feet 
from the Atlantic Ocean to the head of the harbor. Depths 
in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. 
Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. 
The elevation of mean low water in the bays above 
mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from 
about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their 
heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The 
extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to 
about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. 
In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 
2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. 
Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. 
Federal cost of new work for the completed project was 
$1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local 
interests and exclusive of $3,700,000 for rehabilitating the 
south jetty. 
Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests 
must furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as 
needed. 
Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two 
storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, 
and numerous privately owned pile-and-timber piers and 
bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing 
about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed 
bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of 
business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a 
marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 
4-8

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. 
Port facilities have been expanded to include all available 
space in the Fish Harbor. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
A maintenance dredging contract was completed 
on March 30, 1995. A total of 62,116 cubic yards of material 
was removed. 
18. POCOMOKE RIVER, MD 
Location. Pocomoke River is a tributary of Pocomoke 
Sound, a tidal estuary on the east side of Chesapeake Bay 
about 40 miles north of Cape Charles, VA. 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 11 feet deep 
at mean low water and 150 feet wide from the 11-foot 
depth in Pocomoke Sound to Tulls Point, thence 100 feet 
wide to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams 
Point, and for construction of a dike along the offshore 
side of channel between Tulls Point and the end of the 
existing dike; and a channel 9 feet deep at mean low 
water and 100 to 130 feet wide from Shad Landing to the 
bridge at Snow Hill. Length of project is about 8.7 miles 
from Pocomoke Sound to Williams Point, and about 4.5 
miles from Shad Landing to Snow Hill, MD. Shad Landing 
is about 25.7 miles above the mouth of the river. 
Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet in Pocomoke Sound and 
2.5 feet in the river at Snow Hill. Prolonged high winds on 
Chesapeake Bay frequently cause greater fluctuations. 
Estimated cost (1969) for new work is $1,071,458 exclusive 
of amounts expended under previous projects. Extension 
of channel above the bridge at Snow Hill, 100 feet 
wide, 9 feet deep and widened to 150 feet to form a turning 
basin at upper end was deauthorized and is excluded 
from the foregoing estimate. 
Local cooperation. Complied with for section of project 
from Pocomoke Sound to Pocomoke River and from 
Shad Landing to the highway bridge at Snow Hill, authorized 
by acts of June 3, 1986, and August 30, 1935, except 
local interests must furnish releases from damage to oyster 
beds and spoil disposal areas as required for future 
maintenance. Terms for the section of the project above 
the highway bridge at Snow Hill, authorized by act of 
March 2, 1945, required local interests to furnish all 
lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas 
for initial work and future maintenance, hold the United 
States free from damages resulting from the improvement; 
and contribute one-half the initial cost of that portion 
of project, but not to exceed $4,250. This portion was 
deauthorized. Terms for the 11-foot depth channel from 
Pocomoke Sound to deep water in Pocomoke River above 
Williams Point, authorized by act of September 3, 1954, 
and deauthorized in December 1989 required local interests 
to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and 
spoil disposal areas for construction and future maintenance 
of the project; and hold the United States free 
from damages due to construction and maintenance, 
including such damages as may occur to the public or 
leased oyster beds. 
Terminal facilities. Waterfronts at Pocomoke City 
and Snow Hill are built up principally with earthfilled 
timber bulkheads, the majority of which are privately 
owned. A few of the warehouses and factories on the river 
at these communities have railroad sidings and mechanical 
freight-handling facilities. Any appreciable increase in 
commerce at Pocomoke City or Snow Hill would necessitate 
construction of new facilities and repair of existing 
structures. Adequate space is available for development of 
additional terminals. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
A maintenance dredging contract was completed 
on March 24, 1995. A total of 121,590 cubic yards of 
material was removed. 
19. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA 
RIVERS, DC, COLLECTION AND 
REMOVAL OF DRIFT 
Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia 
Rivers, Washington, DC, and their tributaries. 
Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from 
the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their 
tributaries in the Washington area from the head of tidewater 
to Mount Vernon, VA. Total length of project, considering 
both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. See Section 22 of this text. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Operations by hired labor consisted of collection 
and disposal of 112,320 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging 
from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 
20. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT 
CONTROL, MD, VA, AND DC 
Location. The project is located in the Potomac River 
and its tributaries with the northern boundary at Chain 
Bridge in Washington, DC, extending southward to the 
U.S. Route 301 Bridge (see U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart 
12289). 
Existing project. On July 2, 1986 the Chief of 
Engineers under the authority of Section 302 of the 1965 
River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized the control 
of hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical 
harvesting to clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting 
channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. 
Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement 
(LCA) was signed on June 6, 1986 between the Corps, MD, 
VA, DC, and Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. 
The LCA, which must be reexecuted annually, 
initially expired on September 30, 1991 and included the 
following provisions: 1. Local sponsors share 50 percent of 
the program cost; 2. Local sponsors provide lands, easements, 
and rights-of-way; and 3. Metropolitan Washington 
Council of Governments is responsible for coordinating 
local interests and issuing work orders for the program. 
Terminal facilities. There are 75 marina activities 
between DC and the U.S. Route 50 Bridge providing 
4-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
approximately 3,400 commercial and recreational boat 
slips and 50 boat ramps. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Due to the extremely wet year, hydrilla got a late 
start in the growing season. Although topping out in historical 
locations and continuing to spread southward, it 
did not become a problem to watermen until early August. 
Based on the limited budgets of the States, the harvesting 
was postponed until 1996. Shoreline surveys and aerial 
photography continued to be performed. 
21. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS 
AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, MD 
Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor 
of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters and to 
all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and in Maryland. 
Existing project. Patrol and inspection throughout the 
project location to detect violations of sections 13 and 15 
of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 and to 
investigate obstructions to navigation pursuant to Federal 
regulations (33 CFR 209.109). 
Local cooperation. None required.. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Operations, by Supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore 
included inspections of approximately 75 Federal navigation 
channels within the project location to insure channels 
are not obstructed to general navigation by debris, 
sunken vessels/wrecks, and fishing appurtenances. There 
were 21 detailed investigations of obstructions or sunken 
vessels/wrecks. 
22. RHODES POINT TO TYLERTON, MD 
Location. Rhodes Point and Tylerton are two settlements 
about 1.5 miles apart on Smith Island, between 
Chesapeake Bay and Tangier Sound, about 60 miles north 
of Virginia Capes, and about 110 miles south of Baltimore. 
(See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) 
Existing project. Channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide 
from that depth in Tyler Creek to and including an 
anchorage basin of the same depth 150 feet wide and 400 
feet long at Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide 
from that depth in Big Thorofare River to Tylerton; and 
channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from Rhodes Point to 
Tylerton. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet. On January 22, 
1982, the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 
107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, 
authorized a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide a distance 
of about one mile from the anchorage basin at 
Rhodes Point through Sheep Pen Gut to deep water in the 
Chesapeake Bay. 
Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests 
must furnish placement sites for future maintenance 
dredging. 
Terminal facilities. There are numerous pile-and-timber 
wharves along waterfronts at Rhodes Point and Tylerton. 
Facilities are privately owned, open to the public 
without charge when not in use by the owners, and are 
adequate for existing commerce. Sufficient space for construction 
of additional facilities is available, if required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
A maintenance dredging contract was completed 
on July 29, 1995. A total of 115,876 cubic yards of material 
was removed. 
23. TILGHMAN ISLAND HARBOR, MD 
Location. This harbor (also called Dogwood Harbor) 
is about 60 miles southeast of Baltimore Harbor on the 
eastern side of Tilghman Island, which lies between 
Chesapeake Bay and Choptank River. (See Coast and 
Geodetic Survey Chart 78.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide 
and 6 feet deep from that depth in Harris Creek to and 
including an anchorage basin of irregular shape 500 feet 
long by 200 feet wide, with a 6-foot depth. On October 20, 
1980, the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 
107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized 
construction of a breakwater at the harbor 
entrance. The estimated first cost of this work is 
$249,000, of which $245,000 is Federal cost and $4,000 is 
required local cash contribution. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work 
authorized May 13, 1966, except that local interests must 
furnish all lands, and rights-of-way for future maintenance 
as needed and maintain a suitable public landing 
as needed with adequate approaches thereto. For work 
authorized by the Chief of Engineers October 20, 1980, 
local interests have fully complied (excluding furnishment 
of lands and right-of-ways for future maintenance). For 
details of requirements see section 23 of the 1982 Annual 
Report. 
Terminal facilities. Consists of one pier operated by a 
local seafood packer for transfer of seafood to processing 
plant. Local interests will construct a public landing and 
approach road thereto in accordance with terms of local 
cooperation as part of the project development. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Engineering and design work was accomplished 
in connection for future maintenance dredging. 
24. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC 
Location. Within the District of Columbia at junction 
of the Anacostia River with the Potomac River which 
flows southeasterly 108 miles to the Chesapeake Bay. It is 
southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, MD, and 
northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and 
Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) 
Existing projects. The Washington Harbor project 
provides for a channel in the Potomac River from Giesboro 
Point to Key Bridge, a second channel from Giesboro 
Point to the end of Washington Channel, and a third 
channel from the mouth of the Anacostia River to the foot 
of 15th Street, SE, with turning basins opposite the Naval 
Weapons Plant (800 feet wide and 2,400 feet long) and at 
4-10

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
the head of the Anacostia Channel (400 feet square). 
Channel dimensions are 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide 
except upstream from Anacostia Bridge where the width 
is reduced to 200 feet and from Giesboro Point to a point 
3,000 feet downstream of Arlington Memorial Bridge and 
above Easby Point where channel dimensions are 20 feet 
deep and 200 feet wide. Channel lengths including turning 
basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet Washington 
Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; 
and operation and maintenance of the inlet gates and lock 
and the outlet gates of the Tidal Basin constructed under 
a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of 
reference is low-water datum which is 0.35 foot below 
mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal 
ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and 
extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed 
project was $162,006. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally 
of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately 
owned and not open to the public except by special 
arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four 
piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of 
which are open to the public and one open to the public by 
special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four 
privately owned piers and eight governmental piers and 
slips. None of the piers is open to the public except by special 
arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate 
for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
The tidal basin gates were inspected and maintained 
by hired labor. 
25. WICOMICO RIVER, MD 
Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern 
part of Wicomico County, MD, and flows generally southwardly 
emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier 
Sound on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles 
southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is the site of an 
improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico 
River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and 
Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) 
Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet 
wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, about 37 miles 
long, including about 12 miles from the mouth of river to 
Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning 
basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 
100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide 
extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and 
including a basin in Webster Cove of the same depth, 100 
feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 
feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference 
is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 
feet, and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work 
for the completed project was $421,609, exclusive of 
amounts expended on the previous project. 
as needed and hold the United States free from such 
damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. 
Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury 
consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. 
Some wharves have warehouses and factories with 
mechanical freight-handling facilities and rail sidings. All 
terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two 
marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, 
respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas 
for development of new terminals on north prong are 
limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal 
facilities are available on main river. There is a pile-andtimber 
wharf about 4 miles above mouth of river at Mount 
Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White 
Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in 
Webster Cove, a pile-and-timber pier at oyster house on 
southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-and-timber pier 
at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber 
piers on walkways that local interests constructed 
around the basin. Fueling facilities are available at the Tshaped 
pier. Sufficient areas are available for construction 
of additional facilities when required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Engineering and design work was accomplished 
in connection for future maintenance dredging. 
26. RECONNAISSANCE AND 
CONDITION SURVEYS 
(See Table 4-H at end of chapter.) 
27. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public 
Law 86-645 (preauthorization). 
Fiscal year costs were $63,370 for Neale Sound, MD; 
$30,208 for Pleasure Island Channel, MD; $1,446 for Coan 
River, VA; $4,700 for Deal Island Harbor, MD; $5,891 for 
Kent Narrows, MD; $100 for Lower Thorofare, MD; 
$38,385 for Shallow Creek Spur Channel, MD; $34 for 
Solomon, MD; and $63,125 for Tedious Creek, MD. Non- 
Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $51,519 
for Neale Sound, MD; $31,668 for Shallow Creek Spur 
Channel, MD; $34 for Solomon, MD; and $11,884 for 
Tedious Creek, MD. 
Local cooperation. Fully met, except that local interests 
are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance
4-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Beach Erosion Control 
28. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 
WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
Beach Erosion Control pursuant to Sec. 103 of Public 
Law 727, as amended (preauthorization). None. 
29. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND 
Location. The project is located on Fenwick Island at 
Ocean City, MD, which is about 35 miles south of the 
entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic 
Survey Charts 1220.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
steel sheetpile bulkhead along the oceanward edge of the 
boardwalk from about 4th Street to 27th Street and a 
sand dune from 27th Street to about 0.3 mile across the 
Delaware line. The bulkhead is fronted by a 165-foot wide 
beach, and the dune is fronted by a 100-foot wide beach. 
The project also provides for periodic nourishment over 
the 50-year project life. The current estimated total project 
cost is $540,000,000 (including a future inflation 
allowance through the project completion) which includes 
$46,000,000 for initial construction and $494,000,000 for 
periodic nourishment. 
Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the 
project sponsor and the Local Cooperation Agreement was 
executed March 30, 1990. The sponsor is required to: 
provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or 
relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges and other 
facilities; pay 35% of the first costs and 47% of periodic 
nourishment costs; and bear all costs of operation maintenance, 
replacement and major rehabilitation of storm 
damage reduction facilities. To date the sponsor has fully 
met these requirements. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: A construction contract to fully restore the project 
(1,300,000 cubic yards) which was awarded March 30, 
1994 was completed December 22, 1994. The project was 
transferred to the sponsor for operation and maintenance 
on that date. Work also continued on beach monitoring 
throughout the fiscal year. 
30. COLONIAL BEACH, VA 
Location. Colonial Beach, Westmoreiand County, VA, 
is located on the right bank of the Potomac River 40 miles 
upstream from its mouth at Chesapeake Bay and 69 miles 
downstream from Washington, DC. (See U.S. Coast and 
Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12286.) 
Existing project. On May 29, 1980, the Chief of 
Engineers under authority of Section 103 of the River and 
and beach at Castlewood Park; off shore breakwaters; and 
one terminal groin at Castlewood Park. The Central Beach 
extension begins downstream from Hawthorne Street and 
continues southward for 1,570 feet, with a maximum 
width of 120 feet, and provides 107,200 square feet of area, 
stabilized with vegetation about 200 feet of embankment 
behind the beachfill. There are four 200-foot breakwaters 
to stabilize this beach area. At Castlewood Park there are: 
a 59,300 square foot beach area; three breakwaters; and 
one 100-foot terminal groin to reduce shoaling to the 
entrance channel to Monroe Creek. The breakwaters are 
two each at 200 feet in length and one at 300 feet. The 
beach will have periodic nourishment when needed. 
Local cooperation. The May 4, 1981 Local Cooperation 
Agreement with the Town of Colonial Beach, in brief, 
requires the local sponsor to: provide all lands, easements, 
and rights-of-way; hold and save U.S. from damages; 
assure public ownership; assure maintenance and repair 
of the breakwaters; provide 50 percent of the initial construction 
cost; provide 50 percent of the cost of periodic 
beach nourishment. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Nourishment of the existing project at Castlewood 
Park was completed in Spring 1994. Future nourishment 
will be completed as necessary. 
31. TOWN OF NORTH BEACH, MD 
Location. Town of North Beach, Calvert County, MD, 
is located 32 miles east of Washington, DC, 52 miles south 
of Baltimore, MD, and 25 miles south of Annapolis, MD. 
Existing project. On October 27, 1992 the Chief of 
Engineers under the authority of Section 103 of the River 
and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of 
1,250 feet of stone revetment constructed adjacent to a 
failing steel bulkhead. The project will provide protection 
along Bay Avenue between First and Third Streets. The 
project also provided for construction around timber pilings 
that were installed by the town for construction of 
a boardwalk. 
Local cooperation. The December 14, 1992 Local 
Cooperation Agreement with the Maryland State Highway 
Administration, in brief, requires the local sponsor to 
provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold and 
save the U.S. from damages; assure public ownership; 
assure maintenance and repair of the breakwaters; and 
provide 35% of the cost of construction. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Construction of the revetment was completed in 
April 1993. The project has been closed out. 
Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of the 
following work: extending the existing Central Beach area
4-12

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
Flood Control 
32. ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, 
FLOOD PROTECTION 
AND NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, 
DC and MD 
Location. Project is on the Anacostia River at the confluence 
of the northeast and northwest branches at Bladensburg, 
MD, about 9 miles above the mouth at Washington, 
D.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 560.) 
Existing project. Channel improvements of Anacostia 
River from foot of 15th Street SE in District of Columbia, 
to junction of Northeast and Northwest Branches at 
Bladensburg, MD; channel improvement in Northeast 
Branch from mouth upstream to near Longfellow Street 
in Riverdale, MD; channel improvement in Northwest 
Branch from mouth upstream to near 38th Street in 
Brentwood, MD; levees along both banks of the streams to 
protect Bladensburg, Edmonston, Riverdale, Cottage City, 
and Colmar Manor, MD; interior drainage facilities in 
these communities, including four pumping stations and 
necessary intercepting sewers and alterations and reconstruction 
of highway and railroad bridges. A portion of 
channel improvement of Anacostia River, from vicinity of 
15th Street SE in District of Columbia to near Defense 
Highway Bridge on U.S. Route 50, provides for navigation 
channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide with a commercial 
boat basin, and a recreational boat basin having a capacity 
of 150 boats, both on the east bank of river near Bladensburg, 
MD. Federal cost for new work for the completed 
project was $6,042,325. Estimated cost to local interests 
for construction, lands, and damages is $6,275,000. 
Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests 
must furnish placement sites for future maintenance 
dredging. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service monitored completed 
project at Kenilworth Marsh. 
33. BROAD TOP REGION, PA 
Location. The project is located in South Central Pennsylvania, 
and includes portions of Bedford, Fulton, and 
Huntingdon Counties. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle 
sheets Saltillo, PA, and Saxton, PA.) 
Existing project. Provides for a pilot project to develop 
and carry out a watershed reclamation and protection, 
and wetlands creation and restoration project using innovative 
reclamation technologies for the purposes of restoring, 
maintaining and protecting surface and ground 
water, including municipal water supplies, from adverse 
impacts related to acid mine drainage and other runoff. 
The current estimated total project cost is $7,200,000 
which includes $400,000 for preparation of a master plan 
and which includes a future inflation allowance through 
project completion. 
Local cooperation. The Wood-Broad Top-Wells Joint 
Municipal Authority is the potential sponsor for the initial 
pilot project. The local sponsor is required to provide 25% 
of the cost of the project. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: The master plan was completed in March 1995 and 
coordination continued to identify a potential sponsor for 
the initial pilot project. 
34. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER 
RECOVERY, MD 
Location. The project is located in the Maryland portion 
of the Chesapeake Bay. 
Existing project. The authorized project will contribute 
to multi-agency and private efforts to restore 
oyster populations in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake 
Bay. Project elements include: construction or rehabilitation 
of oyster habitat; construction of hatchery and 
seed bar facilities for production and collection of diseasefree 
oyster seed or "spat"; planting of disease-free spat in 
locations which best foster oyster production and health; 
and monitoring of project performance to increase oyster 
populations. The current estimated total project cost is 
$3,334,000 which includes a future inflation allowance 
through project completion. 
Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the sponsor 
for the project. The local sponsor is required to pay 
25% of the cost allocated to fish and wildlife restoration 
and to bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, 
rehabilitation and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities 
after construction. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Planning, engineering and design was initiated 
including coordination with potential sponsors and initiation 
of the project report. The overall project is scheduled 
for completion in September 2000. 
35. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND 
RIDGELEY, WV 
Location. On the North Branch of the Potomac River, 
21 miles upstream from its junction with the South 
Branch of the Potomac River and 197 miles upstream 
from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, 
Frostburg and Flintstone, MD, WV, and PA.) 
Existing project. Channel improvements on the North 
Branch of Potomac River from the Western Maryland 
Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to the 
mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along the left 
bank and levees along the right bank from downstream 
corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV, to a point about 150 feet 
above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements 
along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in 
the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from the highway 
bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and flood wall in West 
Cumberland, MD, on the left bank of the North Branch of 
the Potomac River from the mouth of Wills Creek 
upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and flood wall in 
4-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Ridgeley, WV, on the right bank of the North Branch of 
the Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to 
Patapsco Street near the upstream corporate limits of 
Ridgeley, WV; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland 
and West Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV; removal of 
the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of 
a new industrial dam on the North Branch of the Potomac 
River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration 
and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. 
Federal cost of new work for the completed project is 
$15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief 
funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration 
funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 
of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 
is for lands and damages. 
Local cooperation. Fully met. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
36. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, 
MD AND WV 
Location. Project is located on the North Branch 
Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, 
MD, and Mineral County, WV. The damsite is located 
approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence 
with Savage River at Bloomington, MD. It is also about 5 
air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, 
MD, and Piedmont, WV. (See Geological Survey 
quadrangle sheets, Kitzmiller and Westernport, MD.) 
Existing project. The improvement consists of a rolled 
earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 
800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam is 296 feet 
above streambed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When 
filled to spillway crest, the reservoir will extend about 6.6 
miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control 
storage of 36,200 acre-feet is provided. Storage available 
for low flow augmentation for water supply and water 
quality improvement is 92,000 acre-feet. The reservoir 
controls a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation 
facilities are provided for picnicking, camping and boating. 
Final project cost is $176,325,300. 
Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of the 1977 Annual 
Report for requirements. A water supply contract between 
the Federal Government and the Washington Suburban 
Sanitary Commission in concert with the Fairfax County 
Water Authority, VA, and the District of Columbia was 
executed for repayment of all water supply costs. The first 
of 50 annual payments began in July 1981. Federally 
approved water quality standards put into effect by 
Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of 
Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent 
to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been 
received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that 
they will protect downstream channels from encroachment 
that would adversely affect operation of the project. 
Local interests operate a white water access area below 
the dam. The State of Maryland is building a recreation 
area on the Maryland side of the lake. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
37. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA 
Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of 
Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection 
works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA, substantially 
as recommended by the Chief of Engineers (S. 
Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.). The Basin includes an 
area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. 
37A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA 
Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on 
Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence 
with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East 
Jermyn, PA. 
Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a 
maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top 
length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the 
left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a 
concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter 
uncontrolled conduit. Project controls a drainage area of 
6.2 square miles and provides flood control storage of 
1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the 
drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and 
inundate 87 acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation 
facilities constructed by local interests include a bathing 
beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new 
work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction 
and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition 
$52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were 
expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under 
the recreation facilities for completed projects program. 
Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth 
Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the 
Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain 
limited day use facilities including a small beach. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
38. LOCK HAVEN, PA 
Location. On the West Branch Susquehanna River in 
the City of Lock Haven, PA, about 194 miles above the 
mouth of the Susquehanna River in Clinton County, PA. 
(See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Lock Haven 
and Mile Hall, PA.) 
Existing project. Provides for 36,600 feet of levee and 
1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along the West Branch 
and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, five ponding 
areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type 
drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, 
non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison 
Townships, and minor recreation facilities. The current 
estimated total project cost is $82,500,000. 
4-14

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
Local cooperation. The Lock Haven Area Flood Protection 
Authority, a municipal authority created by the 
City of Lock Haven and Woodward Township, is the 
sponsor for the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement 
was signed March 14, 1991. The local sponsor is required 
to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify or 
relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other 
facilities, pay 5% of structural flood control costs during 
construction; pay 50% of separable recreation costs; and 
bear all operation maintenance and replacement costs for 
the project after construction. To date the sponsor has 
fully met these requirements. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Construction was completed on the third major 
construction contract (remaining Susquehanna River 
levees). The overall project was completed June 15, 1995 
and was transferred to the local sponsor for operation and 
maintenance on that date. 
39. MOOREFIELD, WV 
Location. Moorefield, WV, is located at the junction of 
the South Fork (Moorefield River) of the South Branch of 
the Potomac River, 57 miles upstream from the mouth of 
the South Branch of the Potomac River, and 233 miles 
upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey 
Quadrangle sheets, Moorefield, WV). 
Existing project. Provides for a flood warning system, 
21,600 feet of earth levee, 1,360 linear feet of floodwall, 
highway bridge replacement of one span of a railroad 
bridge, environmental mitigation, and appurtenant project 
features such as ramps, closures, riprap, relocations, 
and ponding areas for local drainage. The current estimated 
total project cost is $21,700,000 which includes a 
future inflation allowance through project completion. 
Local cooperation. The Town of Moorefield is the 
sponsor for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement 
was signed May 12, 1994. The local sponsor is 
required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify 
or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and 
other facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; 
and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and 
replacement of flood control facilities after construction. 
(The cash contribution is deemed satisfied in consideration 
of the transfer of Grandview State Park to the Federal 
Government.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Engineering and design and real estate acquisition 
continued. Bids were opened September 6, 1995 for the 
levee construction contract and award is pending. The 
overall project is scheduled for completion in September 
1997. 
40. LACKAWANNA RIVER, 
OLYPHANT, PA 
Location. The project is located along the Lackawanna 
River in the northeastern portion of the Commonwealth of 
Pennsylvania in Lackawanna County. (See Geological 
Survey Quadrangle sheets, Olyphant, PA.) 
Existing project. Provides for 3,800 feet of earth levee, 
1,400 feet of concrete floodwall, a closure structure, interior 
drainage facilities, 1,500 feet of gabion slope protection 
and associated cultural mitigation and environmental 
restoration. The current estimated total project cost is 
$15,400,000 which includes a future inflation allowance 
through project completion. 
Local cooperation. The Borough of Olyphant is the 
sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to: 
provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or 
relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other 
facilities; pay 5% of the costs allocated to flood control; 
and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement 
of flood control facilities after construction. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Engineering and design continued. The overall 
project is scheduled for completion in November 1999. 
41. PAXTON CREEK, HARRISBURG, PA 
Location. Harrisburg is located in Dauphin County, 
PA, on the eastern bank of the Susquehanna River. Paxton 
Creek, a tributary of the Susquehanna River, flows southwesterly 
through the City. 
Existing project. On June 16, 1993 the Director of 
Civil Works under continuing authority of Section 205 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended, authorized 
construction of an improved flood warning system for Paxton 
Creek in Harrisburg, PA. The project included the 
installation of a base station (comprised of antennae, 
receiver/decoder, personal computer, and appurtenant 
equipment) within Dauphin County, the utilization of a 
flood warning dissemination service, a flood forecast 
model, the installation of an additional rain gauge, and 
the installation of solar panels on two existing rain 
gauges and one existing stream gauge. The improved system 
provides the City of Harrisburg with greater access to 
real time precipitation and stream data, a flood forecast 
capability, improved flood warning dissemination, and 
greater system reliability. 
Local cooperation. The July 19, 1993 Local Cooperation 
Agreement between Baltimore District and the City 
of Harrisburg, in brief, required the local sponsor to provide 
all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold and 
save the U.S. from damages; operate, maintain, repair, 
replace, and rehabilitate the completed project in accordance 
with regulations or directions prescribed by the 
Government; contribute 25% of the total project costs; 
participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood 
plain management and flood insurance programs; and 
develop and adopt a comprehensive, detailed plan for use 
in conjunction with the flood warning system. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: A contract modification to continue providing a 
flood warning dissemination service through September 
30, 1996 was issued on September 18, 1995. 
4-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
42. PETERSBURG, WV 
Location. On the South Branch of the Potomac River 
in eastern Grant County, WV. (See Geological Survey 
Quadrangle sheets, Petersburg, East, WV; Petersburg, 
West, WV; Maysville, WV; and Rig, WV.). 
Existing project. Provides for 18,460 feet of levee and 
900 feet of concrete floodwall along the South Branch, 
raising of U.S. Route 220 highway bridge, 61,000 cubic 
yards of channel excavation, ramps, closures, slope protection, 
relocations, ponding areas for interior drainage, and 
flood warning system improvements. The current estimated 
total project cost is $24,200,000 which includes a 
future inflation allowance through project completion. 
Local cooperation. Grant County is the sponsor for 
the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was 
signed July 13, 1993. The local sponsor is required to: provide 
lands, easements, rights-of-way, modify or relocate 
buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 
5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs 
of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control 
facilities after construction. (The cash contribution is 
deemed satisfied in consideration of the transfer of 
Grandview State Park to the Federal Government.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Engineering and design and real estate acquisition 
continued. Bids were opened August 18, 1995 for the levee 
construction contract and award is pending. The overall 
project is scheduled for completion in August 1997. 
43. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN 
BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA 
Location. Dam site is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 
miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. 
Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, PA. (See 
Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. 
Union, Broad Top and Everett, PA.) 
Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 
feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and 
auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir 
has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 
248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet 
for recreation and water quality control, and the balance 
for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, 
the reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 
miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for 
boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, hiking, 
and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was 
$77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction 
and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including 
relocations. Construction of a private hydroelectric plant 
at Raystown Lake was completed May 1988. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. The fiscal year 1995 Appropriations Act included 
$2.5 million to improve recreation facilities as 
described in the Raystown Lake master plan. All engineering 
and design work has been completed and construction 
began during the 4th quarter of FY 1995. Construction 
is scheduled to be completed in FY 96. 
44. LACKAWANNA RIVER, 
SCRANTON, PA 
Location. The project is located along the Lackawanna 
River in the northeastern portion of the Commonwealth of 
Pennsylvania in Lackawanna County. (See Geological 
Survey Quadrangle sheets, Scranton, PA.) 
Existing project. Provides for 5,800 feet of earth levee, 
1,700 feet of concrete floodwall, 3 closure structures, interior 
drainage facilities, 2,700 feet of gabion slope protection, 
an improved flood warning system, removal of a 
railroad bridge, access ramps, and associated cultural 
mitigation. The current estimated total project cost is 
$20,500,000 which includes a future inflation allowance 
through project completion. 
Local cooperation. The City of Scranton is the 
sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to: 
provide lands, easements and rights-of-way; modify or 
relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other 
facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and 
bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement 
of flood control facilities after construction. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Engineering and design continued. The overall 
project is scheduled for completion in September 2000. 
45. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA 
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION 
Location. The south central Pennsylvania area 
includes the counties of Blair, Bedford, Cambria, Somerset, 
Huntingdon and Fulton. The program area within the 
Baltimore District consists of the Chesapeake Bay watershed 
portion of south central Pennsylvania including 
Blair, Bedford, Huntingdon and Fulton Counties. 
Existing project. A pilot program for providing environmental 
assistance to non-Federal interests in south 
central Pennsylvania. Such assistance may be in the form 
of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and 
development projects, including projects for waste water 
treatment and related facilities, water supply, storage 
treatment, distribution facilities, and surface water 
resource protection and development. Section 313 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 authorized the 
project at a cost of $17 million including $8.5 million within 
the Chesapeake Bay watershed area. 
Local cooperation. The Altoona City Authority is the 
sponsor for the Mill Run water treatment plant. Other 
sponsors are being identified for the Chestnut Ridge 
Municipal Water Authority and Broad Top Township/
Coaldale Borough projects. The local sponsors will be 
required to provide 25% of project costs including lands, 
easements, rights-of-way, and relocations. 
4-16

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Completed planning, engineering and design work 
for the Mill Run water treatment plant at Altoona, and 
completed the master plan to identify additional projects 
and initiated coordination with potential sponsors on 
Chestnut Ridge and Broad Top/Coaldale projects. 
46. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs 
and related flood control works for protection of towns in 
New York and Pennsylvania. The improvements are 
located in the upper watershed of the Susquehanna River 
to and including the Chemung River. 
46A. ADDISON, NY 
Location. At confluence of Tuscarora Creek and 
Canisteo River in the City of Addison, NY. (See Geological 
Survey map for Addison, NY.) 
Existing project. Provides for construction of about 
3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete flood wall 
on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from 
high ground on Steuben Street near the Baltimore & Ohio 
Railroad to the mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of 
existing dam, mill, and raceway from the channel; construction 
of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on the left 
bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora 
Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of 
earth levee on the right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending 
from high ground at the southwest edge of the village 
to high ground at the southeast edge of the village; and 
appurtenant drainage structures. 
Local cooperation. Fully met. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
46B. ALMOND LAKE, NY 
Location. Dam is located two miles upstream from 
Hornell, NY, on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of 
the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for 
Hornell, NY.) 
Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 
1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a 
concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left 
abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10- 
foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same 
size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acrefeet 
at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area 
of 56 square miles, 36' percent of the watershed of the 
Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, NY. Recreation 
facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing 
beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. 
Local cooperation. None required. Local interests 
have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction 
with the Federal Government. These facilities 
are operated and maintained by the Steuben County 
Board of Supervisors. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of project 
continued. 
46C. ARKPORT DAM, NY 
Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from 
Hornell, NY, on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the 
Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. 
(See Geological Survey map for Arkport, NY.) 
Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 
1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above 
the streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated 
outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists 
of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 
660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle is placed in the lower end 
of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. 
The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at 
spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 
square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo 
River upstream from Hornell. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
46D. AVOCA, NY 
Location. On the Cohocton River at the Village of 
Avoca, NY, about 30 miles Upstream from the confluence 
of the Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological 
Survey map for Avoca, NY.) 
Existing project. Provides for improvement and realignment 
of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, 
extending from above the Erie Railroad to below the 
junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction 
of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of the 
Cohocton River, extending from high ground above 
Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below the junction 
of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of 
earth levee on the right bank of Salmon Creek, extending 
from high ground above Alexander Avenue to the Erie 
Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over 
Cohocton River, raising of the Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; 
and appurtenant drainage structures. 
Local cooperation. Fully met. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
4-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
46E. BINGHAMTON, NY 
Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and 
Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, NY. (See 
Geological Survey map for Binghamton, NY.) 
Existing project. Provides for construction of earth 
levees, concrete flood walls, and appurtenant drainage 
structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation 
and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps 
Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on the 
right bank of the Chenango River, extending downstream 
from high ground near the city limits to an existing flood 
wall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; 
about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; 
about 180 feet of concrete wall at the pumphouse near 
McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on the 
right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler 
Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of 
earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River north of 
the city limits in the Village of Port Dickinson, extending 
from Church Street to high ground just north of the city 
line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on the left bank of 
Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to 
Cutler Dam; new concrete flood walls and riverbank 
revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on the left bank 
of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to the junction with 
the Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete 
flood wall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete flood 
wall on the right bank of the Susquehanna River, extending 
from the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad 
downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet 
of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete flood wall and 
capping about 125 feet of concrete flood wall, on the right 
bank of the Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to 
mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, 
about 2,180 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising 
about 125 feet of existing flood wall on the left bank of the 
Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high 
ground at State Highway 17, a debris dam and flume 
between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete 
pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park 
Creek from Vestal Avenue to the Susquehanna River; 
about 665 feet of levee extending from the Erie Railroad 
to high ground along the right bank of Chamberlain 
Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad 
and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 
1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, 
about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, 
about 470 feet of existing concrete flood wall, and about 
200 feet of new concrete flood wall for improvement of 
Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet above 
Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. 
Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control 
dams above the area, will provide protection for the City 
of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent 
greater than the maximum flood of record, which occurred 
in July 1935 on the Chenango River and in March 1936 on 
the Susquehanna River. 
Local cooperation. Fully met. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
46F. CANISTEO, NY 
Location. On Purdy and Bonnets Creeks in the Town 
of Canisteo, NY, situated along the south side of the 
Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bonnets Creek and 
the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for 
Canisteo, NY.) 
Existing project. Provides for construction of about 
8,000 feet of earth levees on the right bank of the 
Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet 
west of State Highway Route 21 above the Town to a 
point at the intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main 
Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on the left bank of 
Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from the Main 
Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street 
1,000 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Bennetts 
Creek extending upstream from the Main Street Bridge; a 
concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood 
Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; alterations 
to existing timber check dams in Bennetts Creek; 
channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and 
appurtenant drainage structures. 
Local cooperation. Fully met. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
46G. CORNING, NY 
Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Corning, 
NY, about 44 miles upstream from the confluence of 
Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. 
(See Geological Survey map for Corning, NY.) 
Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for 
construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete 
flood walls, consisting of: about 4,300 feet of earth 
levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth 
levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the 
right bank of the Chemung River, extending from the Erie 
Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below the 
City; about 200 feet of concrete flood walls, about 2,500 
feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet 
of existing earth levee on the left bank of the Chemung 
and Cohocton Rivers, extending from the Erie Railroad 
Bridge over Cohocton River to the mouth of Post Creek; 
about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 
4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post 
Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realignment of 
about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth 
levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure 
conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir 
for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its 
mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby 
Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection 
on Monkey Run was authorized by the Flood Control 
Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction 
of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2,320 feet of pressure conduit 
storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between the 
existing improved channel above Sixth Street and the 
Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street 
4-18

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
East. Modified improvement will provide protection for 
the City of Corning against a flood discharge in Chemung 
River approximately equal to the maximum flood of 
record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary 
streams against floods of greater magnitude than known 
to date. 
Local cooperation. Fully met. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
46H. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY 
Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, NY, on the 
Ouleout Creek, about five miles above the confluence of 
the creek with the Susquehanna River. (See Geological 
Survey map for Franklin, NY.) 
Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete 
structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 
feet above the streambed and consists of a concrete 
gravity-type section with a compacted earth-dike section 
at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular 
conduits each 3.5 feet by 5.85 feet and 105 feet 
long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acrefeet 
at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area 
of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout 
Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of 
the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, NY, 
exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. 
Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and 
camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. 
Local cooperation. None required. The Town of 
Sidney, NY, cooperated in the development of recreation 
facilities and operates and maintains all the facilities with 
the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility 
of the Federal Government. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
46I. ELMIRA, NY 
Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Elmira, 
NY, about 27 miles upstream from the confluence of the 
Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. 
(See Geological Survey map for Elmira, NY.) 
Existing project. Provides for about 17,700 feet of 
earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete flood wall on 
the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from 
South Hoffman Street to a point below the city near the 
upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee 
and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on the left bank of 
the Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to 
the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at the 
mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee 
on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about the 
intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad 
and East Church Street to high ground near intersection 
of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of 
earth levee on the right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 
feet of concrete conduit enclosing Hoffman Brook from 
West Second Street to the Chemung River; clearing 
islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 
miles in the Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth 
levee on the left bank of Seely Creek, extending from the 
Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet 
northwest of the intersection of South Broadway and 
Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of 
interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet 
long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and 
appurtenant structures. 
Local cooperation. Fully met. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
46J. HORNELL, NY 
Location. On the Canisteo River in the City of Hornell, 
NY, about 42 miles upstream from the confluence of the 
Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map 
for Canisteo, NY.) 
Existing project. Provides for channel realignment 
and earth levees, concrete flood walls, and check dams 
consisting of: realignment of about 4,600 feet of the Canisteo 
River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on 
its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to 
the junction of the Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad 
and the Erie Railroad; about 4,500 feet of earth 
levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from the 
Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and the junction of 
Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; about 7,200 feet of 
earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete flood wall, and 
raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete flood wall, on 
the right bank of the Canisteo River, and about 12,000 
feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca 
Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth 
levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the left 
bank of the Canisteo River extending from a point opposite 
Walnut Street to the Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee 
about 2,800 feet long around the sewage-disposal plant on 
the left bank of the Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of 
realignment and improvement of the Canisteo River 
Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right 
bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 
1,400 feet above East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel 
paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet 
of concrete flood wall, and construction of one check dam 
on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving 
and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run 
with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; 
a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 
4,800 feet of flood walls and levees, and related work on 
existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, 
erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 
3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures 
and small stream control works. Improvement, supple- 
4-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
mented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the 
area, provides protection for the City of Hornell against a 
flood discharge approximately double the maximum flood 
of record, which occurred in July 1935. 
Local cooperation. Fully met. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
46K. LISLE, NY 
Location. On the Tioughnioga River in the Village of 
Lisle, NY, about 12 miles upstream from the confluence of 
the Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological 
Survey map for Lisle, NY.) 
Existing project. Provides for channel realignment 
and construction of earth levees and concrete flood walls, 
consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley 
Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of the 
intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to the confluence 
with Tioughnioga River, realignment of some 5,700 
feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of the Village; 
about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete 
wall on the right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga 
River; realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga 
Street to the railroad crossing on River Street; raising 
about 1,860 feet of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western 
single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 
1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated 
Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. 
Local cooperation. Fully met. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
46L. OXFORD, NY 
Location. On the Chenango River in the Village of 
Oxford, NY, about 40 miles upstream from the confluence 
of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological 
Survey map for Oxford, NY.) 
Existing project. Provides for earth levees and clearing 
of Chenango River Channel, consisting of about 2,100 
feet of earth levees on the left bank of the Chenango 
River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive 
and running mostly along the railroad to high ground 
near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main 
Street; raising the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western 
Railroad over the levee; and appurtenant closure and 
drainage structures. Improvement provides protection for 
the Village of Oxford on the left bank against a flood discharge 
substantially larger than the maximum flood of 
record, which occurred in July 1935. 
Local cooperation. Fully met. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
46M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY 
Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, NY, on 
the Otselic River about 0.7 mile upstream from its confluence 
with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map 
for Whitney Point and Willet, NY.) 
Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 
4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above 
the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet 
in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5- 
foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same 
size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acrefeet 
at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area 
of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, 
or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream 
from Binghamton, NY. Recreation facilities, constructed 
in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, 
picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. 
Local cooperation. None required. Local interests 
operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. During a high water event in March-April 
1993, a significant seepage condition occurred at a location 
of the project where it had not been previously 
observed. A contract to install additional filter drains was 
awarded for $465,000 on June 30, 1994. The construction 
was completed in October 1994. A contract to construct a 
slurry cutoff wall was awarded in July 1995 which will 
complete seepage remediation repairs. A contract was 
awarded in September 1995 to stablize the east spillway 
wall. 
46N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, NY 
Location. On the Tioughnioga River at the confluence 
of the Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of the 
Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for 
Whitney Point, NY.) 
Existing project. Provides for channel realignment 
and earth levees, consisting of realignment of about 1,800 
feet of Tioughnioga River Channel, above the confluence 
with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along 
the right bank of the Tioughnioga River, extending from 
high ground on Main Street above the village to Collins 
Street just below the Village; and appurtenant drainage 
structures. 
Local cooperation. Fully met. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
47. STILLWATER LAKE, 
LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA 
Location. Dam is on the Lackawanna River, 39 miles 
from the mouth of the stream and about 4 miles upstream 
from Forest City, Susquehanna County, PA (See Geological 
Survey Quadrangle sheet, Honesdale, PA.) 
4-20

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet 
above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and 
side channel spillway in the left abutment. Reservoir 
capacity is 12,000 acre-feet, of which 11,600 acre-feet is 
flood control storage and the remainder is used to maintain 
the existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, 
PA, at this site. Reservoir area is 422 acres, and the pool 
extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 
percent of the watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent 
above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal 
cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of 
which $4,500,500 was for construction and $1,225,200 
was for lands and damages. 
Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood 
Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of project 
continued. 
48. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA 
Plan of improvement authorized by the 1958 Flood 
Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque 
Lake, PA, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA, local protection 
works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY, and channel 
improvements at Cortland, NY. This project plan supplemented 
the comprehensive flood control program for 
Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which 
included the Southern New York flood control project and 
Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. 
48A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA 
Location. Dam is on the Cowanesque River about 2.2 
miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, 
PA. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) 
Existing project. The project provides for an earthfill 
dam 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above the 
streambed, an uncontrolled spillway in the right abutment, 
a gated conduit in the Valley floor, and flood control 
storage is 82,000 acre-feet. Relocation of the Town of Nelson 
to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. The Federal 
cost of this new work was $106,030,700 of which 
$61,743,600 was for construction and $44,287,100 was for 
lands and damages and relocations (which includes 
$5,755,000 for relocation of the Town of Nelson). Within 
the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers the 
project was modified in March 1983 in accordance with 
the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Flood 
Control Act of 1944, as amended. The modification provides 
for reallocating 25,600 acre-feet of present flood control 
storage for water supply storage by raising the permanent 
pool from-elevation 1,045 to 1,080 mean sea level. 
Other features include modifying the existing intake 
tower and two access ramps, stabilizing the reservoir 
slope near the relocated Town of Nelson, replacing existing 
day-use recreation facilities, and expanding both dayand 
overnight-use recreation facilities to accommodate an 
expected increase in annual visitation due to the larger 
pool. Estimated cost (October 1991) of the modification is 
$55,198,000 of which $1,257,000 is Federal (for expanded 
recreation facilities) and $53,941,000 is non-Federal 
(which includes $39,414,000 for reimbursement of the cost 
of existing flood control storage reallocated to water 
supply storage, $13,270,000 cash contribution for the 
water supply modification, and $1,257,000 cash contribution 
for expanded recreation facilities). 
Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development 
Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town 
of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army 
acquires any real estate property for the new townsite, 
appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding 
contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite 
will be either occupied when available, replacements for 
open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be 
purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market 
value. The required contractual agreement for local cooperation 
was executed with Nelson Township on August 
25, 1977. The March 1983 project modification (discussed 
above) requires non-Federal interests repay 100 percent of 
the investment cost of project modifications allocated to 
water supply, to terrestrial wildlife habitat mitigation, 
and to in-kind replacement recreation, plus the allocated 
share of the project's original cost (escalated to current 
price levels). Additionally, they are required to pay annual 
costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacements 
allocated to water supply and to provide 50 percent 
of the cost of expanded recreation facilities, as well as, all 
operation, maintenance, and replacement costs for the expanded 
facilities. Water supply and recreation contracts 
were executed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army 
(Civil Works) and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission 
on June 30, 1986. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. Design of replacement of sewage treatment 
plant in the Tompkins Recreation Area was completed. 
Construction began in late FY 95 and is scheduled to be 
completed in May 1996. 
48B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA 
Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, PA, 
upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and 
Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River 
and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately 
opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its 
mouth and less than one mile from the Village of 
Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) 
Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 
140 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet 
conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, and has a 
maximum height of 121.5 feet above the streambed, with 
a concrete spillway. Both dams are of earth and rockfill 
construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls 
4-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
a total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam 
controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and 
Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the 
Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided 
for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. 
Federal cost of completed work was $185,620,000 of which 
$125,029,000 is for completed construction and 
$60,591,000 is for lands and damages and relocations. 
Estimated Federal cost (October 1988) of Mill Creek 
recreation facilities (inactive) is $7,500,000. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. Contracts were awarded to repair streambank 
along Ellen Run in Mansfield, PA, and to repair the Day 
Use Access Road Bridge in the Ives Run Recreation Area. 
49. WEST BRANCH OF 
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA 
A system of three flood control reservoirs, in the headwaters 
of the West Branch Susquehanna River, PA, are 
known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush (formerly known 
as Kettle Creek), and Foster Joseph Sayers (formerly 
known as Blanchard). 
In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the 
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances 
that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson 
Reservoir (formerly known as First Fork Reservoir) with 
operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster 
Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control 
benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson 
Reservoir on the First fork Sinnemahoning Creek in 
Cameron and Potter Counties, PA, was constructed by the 
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of 
$12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation 
and maintenance. 
49A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA 
Location. Alvin R. Bush Dam (formerly Kettle Creek 
Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the 
mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, PA. (See Geological 
Survey map for Keating, PA.) 
Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 
1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with 
an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the 
right abutment, and has a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel 
with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity 
of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a 
drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of 
the Kettle Creek watershed. Recreation facilities are provided 
for camping, fishing, boating, picnicking, hiking, 
winter sports, hunting, and swimming by the State of 
Pennsylvania at Kettle Creek State Park. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
49B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA 
Location. Dam is on the West Branch of the Susquehanna 
River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from 
Curwensville, Clearfield County, PA. (See Geological 
Survey map for Curwensville, PA.) 
Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 
1,850 feet long, rises 131 feet above the streambed, and 
has an open-cut concrete sill 1,750 feet from the left abutment. 
The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist 
of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with 3 
slide control gates 5.5 feet wide and 12 feet high. The 
reservoir has a storage capacity of 124,200 acre-feet at 
spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 365 
square miles, or about 98 percent of the- West Branch 
Susquehanna River at Curwensville and about 75 percent 
at Clearfield. Clearfield County provides recreation 
including boating, fishing, picnicking, and swimming. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
49C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA 
Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in 
Centre County, PA, about one mile upstream from 
Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of 
Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna 
River at Lock Haven, PA. (See Geological Survey map for 
Howard, PA.) 
Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 
6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, and 
has an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete 
weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to 
the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left 
abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet 
conduit with two hydraulically-operated wheel gates 7 
feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage 
capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project 
controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent 
of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of 
the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities 
are provided for boating, camping, fishing, picnicking, 
hunting, swimming, hiking, and winter sports by the 
State of Pennsylvania at Bald Eagle State Park. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. 
4-22

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
50. WYOMING VALLEY, PA 
(LEVEE RAISING) 
Location. The project is located in northeastern Pennsylvania 
and extends from Duryea on the Lackawanna 
River southwestward to Nanticoke on the Susquehanna 
River. The Wyoming Valley flood control projects are 
located on the Susquehanna River in Luzerne County and 
are the four contiguous existing Federal flood control projects 
at Plymouth, Kingston-Edwardsville, Swoyersville- 
Forty Fort, and Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Township, 
which together function as a flood control system within 
the Valley. 
Existing project. The proposed modification provides 
for raising existing levees and floodwalls between 3 and 5 
feet, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities and 
providing some new floodwalls and levees to maintain the 
integrity of the existing flood control system. The proposed 
project also includes a mitigation plan to reduce 
project-related adverse impacts. The current estimated 
total project is $147,000,000 which includes a future inflation 
allowance through project completion. 
Local cooperation. The Luzerne County Flood Protection 
Authority is the sponsor for the project. The local 
sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements and 
rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, 
roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 17% of costs allocated 
to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share 
of flood control costs to 25%; pay one-half of the separable 
costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, 
maintenance, and replacement of flood control and 
recreation facilities after construction. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Continued engineering and design including completion 
of the Final Phase II General Design Memorandum, 
completion of plans and specifications for Exeter 
levees and initiation of plans and specifications for levee 
work at Swoyersville-Forty Fort, Kingston-Edwardsville, 
and Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Township. The overall 
project is scheduled for completion in September 2001. 
51. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA 
Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence 
with the Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek has 
tributary branches in York County in the south and 
central parts of Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey 
Quadrangle sheets for York and Hanover, PA.) 
Existing project. Indian Rock Dam is an earth and 
rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at the top, rising 83 feet 
above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for control 
storage of 28,000 acre-feet. The dam is on the main 
branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet 
works are in the right abutment, and the uncontrolled 
spillway is on the right bank. The reservoir will control 
the entire drainage area of the main branch of Codorus 
Creek and 41 percent of the drainage area above York. 
Improvements in Codorus Creek in the vicinity of and 
through the City of York provide for 22,969 feet of channel 
extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point 
downstream from the Pennsylvania Railroad crossing 
known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will 
increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, 
include widening and deepening the channel, bank protection, 
removal of York Roller Mill Dam, and a low water 
channel about 3,900 feet long in the vicinity of York Roller 
Mill Dam. Cost of new work for the completed project was 
$5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and 
$11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction 
and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
June 28, 1938, applies. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Normal operation and maintenance of the project 
continued. Engineering and design for repair of concrete 
was initiated in FY 1995 and scheduled to be completed in 
early FY 1996. A construction contract for concrete repair 
is scheduled to be awarded in FY 1996. 
52. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District 
of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period 
by hired labor. See table 4-1. 
53. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL 
RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 
Operations and results during fiscal year. The 
operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, PA, was coordinated 
with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, 
and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch 
Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum 
flood control benefits from the system operation. Costs 
during the period were $45,210. 
Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage 
River Dam, MD, were provided, during periods of high 
water, to insure maximum protection for downstream 
localities. Costs during the period were $62,695. 
54. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, 
and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and 
antecedent legislation). 
Cost for the period was $234,179 for the Disaster Preparedness 
Program. 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public 
Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). 
Federal year costs were $48 for Bloomsburg, PA; 
$30,751 for Flat Branch, VA; $51,408 for Gwynns Falls, 
Baltimore, MD; and $2,291 for Neabsco Creek, VA. 
Non-Federal contributed costs were $19,570 for Flat 
Branch, VA; and $67 for Gwynns Falls, Baltimore, MD. 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public 
Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). 
Fiscal year costs were $56,525 for Rooster Island, MD; 
$54 for North Beach, MD; and $14,628 for Punch Island 
Road, MD. 
Non-Federal contributed costs were $148,389 for 
Rooster Island, MD. 
4-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Water Supply 
55. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT 
Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply 
intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of 
Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station 
and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are 
located in Maryland. All other structures of the water 
supply system including parts of the raw water collecting 
system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage 
reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of 
Columbia. Federal owned water mains are maintained in 
Virginia and Maryland. 
Existing project. Control of the water supply system is 
vested in the Chief of Engineers (see Acts of March 3, 1859, 
and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of 
Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; 
operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, 
pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the 
water supply system; engineering; and construction of 
major water system additions and improvements. 
Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City 
of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is 
contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved 
April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 
26, 1947. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full 
on page 4-19 of the Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Purified 
water was furnished to the District of Columbia; 
Arlington County, and Falls Church, VA; and to the - 
Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, 
Arlington County, VA, and Montgomery County, Maryland. 
Total consumption for Fiscal Year 1995 was 66.5 
billion gallons. The average amount furnished Arlington 
County and Falls Church, VA was 39.3 million gallons per 
day. The Corps of Engineers was reimbursed $7,080,932 
for water furnished Washington Aqueduct to the Virginia 
Communities. 
The treated water delivered by Washington Aqueduct to 
approximately one million consumers met or surpassed all 
water quality standards promulgated by the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency under the Safe Water Act 
(P.L. 93-523). 
General Investigations 
56. SURVEYS 
Federal costs for the fiscal year were $4,128,552 of 
which $678,445 was for navigation studies, $1,783,266 for 
flood damage prevention studies, $649,473 for special 
studies, $234,502 for review of completed projects, 
$553,617 for special investigations, $28,302 for interagency 
water resource development, $852 for North American 
waterfowl management plan, $8,852 for National 
Marine Fisheries Service, and $191,243 for coordination 
with other agencies and non-Federal interests. 
Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were 
$692,157 of which $482,230 was for navigation studies, 
$18,817 for flood damage prevention studies, $34,094 for 
review of completed projects, and $157,016 for coordination 
with other agencies and non-Federal interest. 
57. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
BASIC DATA 
Costs for flood plain management activities and general 
planning guidance during the period was $198,604. Providing 
assistance and guidance to local interests on 
methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood 
damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. 
58. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 
AND DESIGN 
Curwensville Lake, PA-Reallocation-The authorized 
project includes modification of project features to allow 
reallocating an estimated 5,360 acre-feet of storage from 
conservation to water supply. Negotiations for a water 
supply contract were completed, and the contract was executed 
September 30, 1994. Estimated planning and engineering 
cost is $547,000 which is being repaid by the 
sponsor. Total costs during the fiscal year were -$97,441 
based on reimbursement of planning and design costs by 
the local sponsor. 
Washington, DC & Vicinity-The authorized project 
would provide for raising the grade of a portion of P 
Street, filling an area near the Lincoln Memorial (along 
23rd Street) regrading the area adjacent to 17th Street 
and constructing a removable closure structure across 
17th Street. These measures were authorized to restore 
the design level of protection of the existing project and to 
reduce the need for emergency closure in the event of a 
flood. Total costs during the fiscal year were $78,996. 
Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,837,000. 
4-24

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
TABLE 4A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total 
Section to 
in Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
1. Baltimore Harbor 
and Channels, 
MD and VA 
2. Baltimore Harbor, 
MD, Collection and 
Removal of Drift 
3. Broad Creek, MD 
4. Chester River, MD 
5. Crisfield Harbor, MD 
6. Fishing Creek, MD 
7. Herring Bay & 
Rockhold Creek, MD 
8. Herring Creek. 
Tall Timbers, MD 
9. Honga River and 
Tar Bay, MD 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
(50,818) 
15,983,4622 
15,993,6003 
(94,300) 
270,795 
329,000 
330,551 
60,000 
48,284 
1,950,000 
1,077,138 
5,739,0004 
5,992,4895 
1,338 
1,339 
348,000 
347,778 
7,296 
957,600 
966,339 
441,000 
953,709 
13,710,000 
13,826,410 
1,373,000 
1,382,751 
413,600 
402,593 
45,000 
38,728 
40,800 
43,156 
200,000 
503,107 
12,736,000 
12,840,978 
144,821,7121 
144,576,0081 
151,613,6696 
151,907,5766 
- 67,033,938 
13,712 66,179,530 
390,000 
400,686 
154,000 
155,627 
6,213,599 
6,212,880 
199,000 
194,355 
- 70,4957 
- 77,7917 
(16,000) 2,786,324 
(15,356) 2,786,323 
35,100 
28,261 
35,000 
35,000 
121,650 
25,865 
25,000 
25,000 
58,500 
58,500 
249,000 
248,999 
(6,000) 
(6,099) 
20,000 
18,669 
384,2548 
377,4158 
1,807,433 
1,842,275 
121,650 
25,865 
111,242 
111,242 
1,869,880 
1,884,227 
50,591 
50,591 
1,105,148 
1,105,048 
1,506,259 
1,504,297 
168,329 
166,998 
10,306 
10,306 
44,600 
77,600 
43,600 
33,600 
673,300 
675,377 
66,1199 
66,1199 
4,909,935 
4,934,744 
4-25

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL ORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AN FINANCIAL SATEMENT 
See Total 
Section to 
in Text Project Funding FY92 FY93a FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
10. Island Creek, MD 
11. Knapps Narrows, 
MD 
12. Little Wicomico 
River, MD 
13. Nanticoke River, MD 
14. Nanticoke River, 
DEL and MD 
15. Neabsco Creek, VA 
16. Northeast River, 
MD 
17. Ocean City Harbor 
and Inlet and 
Sinepuxent Bay, MD 
18. Pocomoke River, MD 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
- 1,301,300 
- 96,343 
45,000 193,000 
33,163 203,933 
- 198,420 
- 39,157 
458,200 
464,230 
(24,000) 
(23,999) 
40,300 
40,300 
519,000 
517,723 
8,600 
(123) 
31,000 
30,995 
280,000 
256,435 
2,000 
10,845 
50,900 
50,443 
46,000 
43,907 
58,300 
28,300 
11,966 
71,700 
76,879 
59,500 
59,500 
55,000 
55,000 
67,000 
65,455 
165,000 
100,215 
223,000 
246,064 
25,000 
26,155 
8,000 
8,457 
(1,500) 
75 
100,000 
842,869 
20,000 
17,525 
594,000 
595,716 
1,163,000 
1,227,218 
4-26 
1,325,136 
120,179 
716,010 
715,105 
198,420 
39,157 
46,12110 
46,12110 
2,558,775 
2,588,884 
81,88511 
81,88511 
2,291,477 
2,290,278 
73,243 
73,242 
604,441 
604,441 
143,13412 
143,13412 
1,156,417 
1,156,399 
13,100 
14,675 
100,000 
842,869 
28,48913 
28,48913 
1,038,344 
1,005,869 
350,19314 
362,15914 
11,109,080 
11,108,251 
4,335,900 
4,335,900 
191,72615 
191,72615 
3,433,973 
3,432,325

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total 
Section to 
in Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
19. Potomac and 
Anacostia Rivers, 
DC, Collection & 
Removal of Drift 
20. Potomac River- 
Aquatic Plant 
Control, MD, 
VA, and DC 
21. Prevention of 
Obstructions & 
Injurious Deposits, 
Baltimore, Harbor MD 
22. Rhodes Point to 
Tylerton, MD 
23. Tilhgman Island 
Harbor, MD 
24. Washington 
Harbor, DC 
25. Wicomico River, 
MD 
29. Atlantic Coast of 
Maryland 
30. Colonial Beach, 
MD 
31. Town of North 
Beach, MD 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed 
Approp. 
Cost 
596,000 
597,207 
130,000 
116,331 
365,000 
365,170 
786,000 
781,115 
158,000 
52,442 
510,000 
509,960 
62,100 
62,100 
68,600 
71,262 
153,000 
156,332 
25,000 
24,328 
609,000 
569,013 
810,600 
805,998 
49,196 
431,000 
428,340 
171,000 
157,603 
30,000 
28,672 
633,000 
617,134 
3,400,000 1,325,000 5,389,000 
5,213,051 1,288,040 3,262,817 
3,127,797 
3,214,978 
1,409 
21,810 
3,219 
786,808 
832,338 
142,000 
106,963 
114,000 
668 
287,292 
37,892 
2,515,000 
2,699,622 
2,118 
330,300 
444,918 
241,999 
730,000 11,829,375 
734,580 11,824,212 
20,000 
165,355 
10,000 
2,301,065 
2,224,780 
301,866 
291,865 
510,000 8,091,045 
507,555 8,085,900 
- 304,000 
- 304,000 
1,154,000 2,369,894 
1,166,450 2,368,946 
- 424,800 
- 424,800 
20,000 388,306 
17,672 422,836 
- 16,409 
-- 16,409 
- 3,191,07716 
- 3,191,07716 
32,000 5,112,78317,18 
32,950 5,111,73317,18 
- 471,60919 
- 471,60919 
59,000 9,652,999 
84,108 9,622,243 
100,000 27,290,000 
2,298,704 27,052,300 
1,409,907 16,472,212 
1,861,518 16,321,250 
9,320 
677,260 
649,957 
- 414,977 
- 414,977 
(15,500) 450,610 
1,805 450,610 
(4,138) 283,154 
3,263 245,262 
4-27

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1985 
TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total 
Section to 
in Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30,1995 
32. Anacostia River & New Work 
Tribs, Flood Prot. & 
Navigation Improve. 
ments, DC and MD 
33. Broad Top Region, 
PA 
34. Chesapeake Bay 
Oyster Recovery, MD 
35. Cumberland, MD, 
and Ridgeley, WV 
36. Jennings Randolph 
Lake, MD and WV 
37A. Aylesworth Creek 
Lake, PA 
38. Lock Haven, PA 
39. Moorefield, WV 
40. Olyphant, 
Lackawanna River, 
PA 
41. Paxton Creek, 
Harrisburg, PA 
42. Petersburg, WV 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed 
Approp, 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
140,000 2,046,324 
129,242 2,085,918 
82,000 
84,735 
2,310 
64,000 
64,001 
9,539 
1,332,000 1,326,000 
1,384,577 1,321,568 
169,000 
169,541 
146,000 
145,164 
17,000 
100,000 
69,963 
421,000 
149,180 
76,000 
75,528 
1,740,800 
1,707,001 
172,000 
168,871 
16,212,000 20,328,000 12,438,000 
15,090,644 22,101,874 10,844,124 
1,996,495 1,856,505 
2,237,274 2,049,826 
37,500 
370,000 
312,699 
1,256,975 
1,158,201 
461,000 
410,849 
84,900 
44,647 
11,649 
532,000 
578,433 
6,042,325 
6,042,325 
3,691,97920 
3,735,97920 
100,000 
69,963 
421,000 
149,180 
- 15,633,970 
- 15,633,970 
75,000 1,286,413 
71,774 1,282,715 
- 176,325,300 
- 176,333,632 
1,555,000 
1,578,993 
147,000 
147,984 
1,772,709 
694,091 
739,000 
667,330 
118,116 
118,116 
1,100,000 
588,996 
(3,433) 
3,435,000 
3,206,453 
17,724,922 
17,699,261 
2,320,400 
2,320,400 
2,249,523 
2,245,392 
55,523,000 
55,267,692 
17,746,975 
6,139,392 
1,200,000 
1,078,179 
118,116 
118,116 
1,100,000 
588,996 
84,900 
41,214 
37,500 
11,649 
4,337,000 
4,097,585 
4-28

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total 
Section to 
in Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
43. Raystown Lake, 
Raystown Branch, 
Juniata River, PA 
44. Scranton, 
Lackawanna River, PA 
45. South Central 
Environmental Infrastructure 
and Resource 
Protection Development 
Pilot, PA 
46A. Addison, NY 
46B. Almond Lake, NY 
46C. Arkport Dam, NY 
46D. Avoca, NY 
46E. Binghamton, NY 
46F. Canisteo, NY 
46G. Comrning, NY 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
3,056,000 3,288,600 2,651,800 
3,098,539 3,133,998 2,764,198 
- 5,000,000 
- 320,682 
11,100 
11,588 
351,000 
351,775 
171,000 
170,494 
13,200 
13,377 
5,000 
5,000 
405,000 
400,330 
182,000 
180,621 
9,000 
9,000 
27,300 
26,616 
346,000 
338,686 
168,000 
168,156 
44,300 
43,731 
- 77,408,770 
- 77,408,770 
5,465,000 44,391,615 
3,699,834 42,573,235 
1,000,000 
739,993 
3,500,000 
409,832 
43,300 
23,040 
8,000 
7,748 
1,000,000 
739,993 
8,500,000 
730,514 
43,300 
23,040 
827,050 
827,050 
293,055 
292,118 
- 5,760,211 
- 5,760,211 
388,000 6,081,681 
370,920 6,051,867 
- 1,910,00021 
- 1,910,00021 
179,000 3,060,712 
172,508 3,051,999 
16,000 
16,065 
436,37422 
436,37422 
525,061 
524,556 
- 3,460,00023 
- 3,460,00023 
38,200 
36,542 
40,000 
40,001 
68,300 
54,067 
44,000 
52,282 
722,281 
716,330 
- 1,183,11124 
- 1,183,11124 
45,900 
50,331 
16,000 
15,825 
110,000 
108,316 
22,900 
24,390 
992,035 
991,630 
- 3,322,00025 
- 3,322,00025 
53,000 
53,189 
41,000 
40,469 
61,400 
62,019 
45,100 
45,001 
1,061,388 
1,061,289 
4-29

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total 
Section to 
in Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
46H. East Sidney Lake, 
NY 
461. Elmira, NY 
46J. Hornell, NY 
46K. Lisle, NY 
46L. Oxford, NY 
46M. Whitney Point 
Lake, NY 
46N. Whitney Point 
Village, NY 
47. Stillwater Lake, 
Lackawanna River, 
PA 
48A. Cowanesque Lake, 
PA 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed 
Approp. 
Cost 
374,000 
372,058 
19,000 
19,075 
578,900 
573,242 
34,200 
34,456 
13,000 
13,867 
3,939 
1,166,139 
18,000 
18,215 
292,000 
283,740 
(170,000) 
240 
1,425,000 
1,427,617 
190,682 
148,389 
387,000 
379,282 
9,000 
9,000 
928,000 
924,304 
29,000 
29,000 
14,000 
14,000 
417,000 
414,021 
14,000 
14,000 
251,000 
253,118 
1,471,000 
1,464,262 
(9,483) 
120 
401,000 
394,280 
23,300 
16,005 
150,300 
159,773 
52,300 
51,661 
31,700 
29,982 
993,000 
1,007,822 
43,100 
42,495 
295,000 
292,202 
1,499,800 
1,479,342 
447,000 
423,181 
5,000 
11,270 
135,000 
121,600 
24,000 
23,775 
13,000 
12,112 
1,410,000 
917,201 
19,000 
18,903 
313,000 
304,405 
6,049,504 
6,049,504 
7,962,771 
8,010,741 
6,883,305 
6,883,305 
392,549 
391,524 
4,558,69826 
4,558,69826 
9,334,576 
9,319,574 
661,19927 
661,19927 
927,022 
926,158 
131,00028 
131,00028 
319,632 
317,026 
5,421,539 
5,421,539 
10,237,296 
9,897,053 
424,096 
424,096 
499,381 
498,680 
5.725.700 
5,725,700 
4,648,590 
4.630,102 
(106,000) 107,470,700 
(106,542) 107,468,081 
2,071,000 16,609,381 
1,604,961 16,097,953 
106,542 
13,495,276 
13,495,275 
4-30

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total 
Section to 
in Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
48B. Tioga-Hammond New Work 
Lakes, PA Approp. - - - - 186,244,800 
Cost 8,575 - - - 186,244,800 
Maint. 
Approp. 1,786,400 2,062,000 1,719,800 2,070,000 23,840,043 
Cost 1,786,728 2,042,698 1,675,247 2,039,394 23,739,907 
49A. Alvin R. Bush New Work 
Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 7,103,001 
Cost - - - - 7,103,001 
Maint. 
Approp. 436,000 558,000 490,000 569,000 9,896,076 
Cost 445,696 544,881 484,650 549,091 9,867,065 
49B. Curwensville Lake, New Work 
PA Approp. - - - - 20,396,060 
Cost - - - - 20,396,060 
Maint. 
Approp. 461,000 537,000 497,000 606,000 11,954,576 
Cost 459,947 534,874 479,803 592,908 11,918,092 
49C. Foster Joseph Sayers New Work 
Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 30,887,06329 
Cost - - - 30,887,06329 
Maint. 
Approp. 563,000 735,000 664,000 689,000 11,801,108 
Cost 557,431 734,105 650,934 654,352 11,745,267 
50. Wyoming Valley, PA New Work 
Approp. - - - 2,000,000 2,000,000 
Cost - - - 1,833,599 1,833,599 
51. York, Indian Rock New Work 
Dam, PA Approp. - - - f- 5,601,16730 
Cost - - - - 5,601,16730 
Maint. 
Approp. 525,300 582,000 494,000 596,000 12,318,28031 
Cost 520,719 571,843 495,471 518,946 12,230,03031 
1. Includes $8,467,003 for previous projects. 
2. Includes $1,955,262 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 
3. Includes $1,961,340 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 
4. Includes $5,793,000 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 
5. Includes $5,992,489 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 
6. Includes $399,802 for previous projects. 
7. Includes $38,041 for previous projects. 
8. Includes $87,740 for previous projects. 
9. Includes $2,200 contributed funds and includes $27,668 
emergency relief funds 
10. Includes $46,121 public works funds. 
11. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 
12. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 
13 Includes $20,640 for previous projects. 
14 Includes $283,008 public works funds and $67,185 
emergency relief funds: excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 
15. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. Includes 
$20,500 for previous projects. 
16 Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. 
: 7 Includes $1.831,609 for previous project. 
18. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under 
provisions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. 
19. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes 
$14,000 contributed funds. 
20. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. 
21. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. 
22. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. 
23. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 
24. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. 
25. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. 
26. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and excludes 
$15,000 contributed funds. 
27. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 
28. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. 
29. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance with 
Tri-party Agreement for construction of a sanitary system 
for public use. 
30. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. 
31. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. 
4-31

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 4-B 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Project and Work Authorized 
Aug. 8, BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD and VA 
1917 Branch channel 35 feet deep to head of Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and 
400 feet wide Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, thence 150 
feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover 
Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near 
entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for 
Baltimore Harbor.1 
H. Doc. 799, 
64th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Jan. 21, 
1927 
Jul. 3, 
1930 
Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. 
Increased anchorage facilities. 
Jul. 3, For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot 
1930 depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen 
angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar section; and for width of 400 feet 
in Curtis Bay section. 
Oct. 17, For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below 
1940 Pennington Avenue Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordinance 
Depot. 
Mar. 2, Uniform main channel 39 feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section 
1945 and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 feet 
long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 400 feet wide and 
27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland 
Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 
200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel 
in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington 
Avenue Bridge. 
Mar. 2, A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of 
1945 Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, 
thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage 
basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast 
Guard wharf. 
Jul. 3, Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at 
1958 entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 
feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore 
Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance 
and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry 
Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide 
from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; 
and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in 
Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide 
Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged 
to that depth by local interests. 
Dec. 31, Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 
1970 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the 
existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the 
Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; 
deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to 
a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and 
at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 
50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide 
and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; 
deepening of the Northwest Branch-East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from 
the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening 
of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the 
channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest 
Branch--West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the 
time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped 
turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long 
with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 11, 
70th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 86, 
85th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Adopted as a national 
defense project. (No 
printed Report.) 
H. Doc. 741, 
79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 
In accordance with 
plans on file in the 
Office, Chief of 
Engineers 
H. Doc. 86, 
85th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 181, 
94th Cong., 1st Sess. 
4-32 
1. 
Documents r -- -- -- r vv w v v 
r i 
r

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Jun. 30, 
1948 
BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT 
Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters. 
BROAD CREEK, MD 
Jul. 25, A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in the straight 
1912 reaches and 130 feet wide at the bends from the 6-foot contour in Pocomoke 
Sound through Broad Creek to the 6-foot contour in Little Annemessex River, 
a distance of about 3 miles. 
4, 
Mar. 3, 
1873 
Sep. 19, 
1980 
Jun. 30, 
1948 
Mar. 3, 
1925 
Aug. 26, 
1937 
Aug. 26, 
1937 
CHESTER RIVER, MD 
A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from Chester River 
to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows. 
A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to 
Jones Landing. 
A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from the 7- 
foot depth in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of the 
same depth and 300 feet square at the head of the channel. 
CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD 
A 12-foot channel of varying widths to opposite Consumers Ice Co., thence 10 
feet deep and 100 feet wide from ice plant to Hop Point. 
7-foot channel 100 feet wide from opposite Hop Point to an anchorage parallel to 
Brick Kiln Road. 
For the 7 foot x 60 foot channel in Little Annemessex River... 
Mar. 3, A mooring basin 7 feet deep, 160 feet wide, and about 875 feet long roughly 
1945 parallel to Brick Kiln Rd., with a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide leading 
from there to the 7-foot project channel connecting Little Annemessex and Big 
Annemessex Rivers. 
Sep. 3, An anchorage basin in Somers Cove 10 feet by 600 feet by 1,000 feet with an 
1954 approach channel 10 feet by 100 feet from 10-foot depth in Little Annemessex 
River through a land cut in Jersey Island to south side of basin. 
Aug. 14, Change location and dimensions of approach channel to Somers Cove to plan 
1958 No. 2 through the present entrance, at no increase in Federal cost of modification. 
FISHING CREEK, MD 
Aug. 26, A channel 7 feet deep with widths of 100 feet and 60 feet from deep water in 
1937 Chesapeake Bay to an anchorage of the same depth, 120 feet wide and 400 feet 
long, located in the marsh 500 feet above the mouth of the creek and twin 
stone jetties at the entrance. 
HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD 
Jul. 3, A channel 60 feet wide, 5 feet deep, from the 6-foot contour in Herring Bay to 
1930 the 3-foot contour in Rockhold Creek. 
Jun. 20, For the present project channel dimensions, 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide, the 
1938 turning basin 7 feet deep, and a stone breakwater 900 feet long. 
HEtRING CREEK, TALL TIMBERS, MD 
Jul. 3, Provides for an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a turning 
1950 basin of irregular shape and 6 feet deep, and riprap stone jetties on the 
upstream and downstream sides of the entrance channel 770 and 650 feet 
-long, respectively. The project length is 1,630 feet. 
Mar. 7, Constructing 250 feet of beachfill, 2,187 linear feet of stone revetment, and 
1986 upgrading 350 feet of existing revetment along the Tall Timbers waterfront. 
Sec. 111 
2. 
3. 
4-33 
River and Harbor Act 
of 1948 
H. Doc. 269, 
62d Cong., 2d Sess.2 
H. Doc. 381, 
80th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Ex. Doc. 65, 
51st Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 380, 
80th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 
H. Doc. 355, 
68th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 2, 
75th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 72, 
75th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 457, 
76th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 435, 
81st Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 435, 
81st Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 241, 
75th Cong., 1st. Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 34, 
71st Cong., 2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 595, 
75th Cong., 3rd 
Sess. 2 
H. Doc. 159 
84th Cong., 1st Sess.2 
Detailed Project Report 
July 18, 1985

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD 
Aug. 30, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay 
1935 through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River. 
Jun. 30, Modification provoding for a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide 
1948 from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back 
Creek, with a turning basin of the same depth, 150 feet long and 200 feet wide. 
10. 
Mar. 2, 
1945 
Sep. 19, 
1980 
ISLAND CREEK, MD 
A channel 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide through the entrance to Island Creek 
with an anchorage basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long in 
the creek. 
KNAPPS NARROWS, MD 
Aug. 30, A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends 
1935 from deep water in Chesapeake Bay in deep water in Harris Creek, MD with a 
turning basin west of the drawbridge, 7 feet deep at mean low water, about 
320 feet long and 120 feet wide. Project channel was authorized by the Public 
Works Administration September 16, 1933 and later adopted by 1935 River 
and Harbor Act. 
LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA 
Aug. 30, A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Potomac River to deep water in 
1935 Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet long at the 
entrance; and 1,004 linear feet of timber bulkhead to stabilize the dredged 
inner channel. 
NANTICOKE RIVER, MD 
Aug. 26, A small boat harbor 7 feet deep, 120 feet wide, and 400 feet long in the marsh at 
1937 Nanticoke with an entrance channel of the same depth and 60 feet wide protected 
on either side by stone jetties in the river. 
Jun. 3, NANTICOKE RIVER, DE AND MD 
1896 A 9-foot channel, 100 feet wide up to Seaford, DE, with a turning basin. 
Jun. 25, 
1910 
Jun. 25, 
1910 
Mar. 2, 
1945 
Slight widening between bridges in harbor at Seaford, DE. 
A channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide in Northwest Fork, together with turning 
basin. 
A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Tangier Sound to 
highway bridge at Seaford, DE. 
NEABSCO CREEK, VA 
Mar. 3, Channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the Potomac River to 
1881 Atkinson's Upper Landing and Willis' Wharf. 
NORTHEAST RIVER, MD 
Aug. 26, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the river to the foot of 
1937 Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a 
basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 35, 
74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 580, 
80th Cong., 2nd Sess. 2 
H. Doc. 99, 
75th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 
H. Doc. 308, 
72nd Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 24, 
72nd Cong., 1st. Sess. 
H. Doc. 242, 
75th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 
H. Doc. 323, 
53rd Cong., 3rd Sess., 
and Annual Report, 
1985, p. 1165. 
H. Doc. 674, 
61st Cong., 2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 869, 
60th Cong., 1st Sess.2 
S. Doc. 69. 
77th Cong.. 1st Sess. 
H. Ex. Doc. 41, 46th 
Cong., 3d Sess. 
H. Doc. 248, 
75th Cong., 1st Sess. 
4-34 
9. 
11. 
12. 
13. 
14. 
15. 
16.

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD 
Aug. 30, Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 10 
19353 feet deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 
feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green 
Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. 
Aug. 30, Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the west 
19354 side of the bay with two turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet 
wide from the inlet channel to opposite North 8th Street, Ocean City, and 75 
feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. 
Sep. 3, Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet above 
19455 mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean 
through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay Channel, thence 200 feet to the project 
harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer 
to project datum. 
18. 
Jun. 3, 
1896 
POCOMOKE RIVER, MD 
A 9-foot channel from Shad Landing to Snow Hill. 
Aug. 30, A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Pocomoke Sound to Pocomoke 
1935 River. 
Mar. 2, 
1945 
Sep. 3 
1954 
Extend channel above bridge at Snow Hill, 100 feet wide, 9 feet deep, widened 
to 150 feet to form a turning basin at upper end. 
Channel 11 feet deep by 150 feet wide from Pocomoke Sound to Tulls Point, 
thence a channel of the same depth and 100 feet wide to deep water in 
Pocomoke River above Williams Point, and dike construction along south side 
of channel from existing dike to Tulls Point. 
POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC, COLLECTION & REMOVAL 
OF DRIFT 
Oct. 27,, Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers 
1965 and their tributaries in the Washington, DC area from the head of the tidewater 
to Mount Vernon, VA. 
POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, AND DC 
Jul. 2, Control of Hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting to 
1986 clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible 
public use areas. 
PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, 
BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD 
Aug. 30, Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, and its 
1935 tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for 
transporting and depositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project 
is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie 
within the State of Maryland.) 
22. 
Jan. 22, 
1982 
Sec. 107 
Jul. 14, 
1960 
Sep. 3, 
1954 
Aug. 1, 
1968 
Sec. 107 
Jul. 14, 
1960 
RHODES POINT TO TYLERTON, MD 
A channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide at mean low water from the northern 
limit of existing Rhodes Point to Tylerton Federal navigation channel, a distance 
of about one mile, through Sheep Pen Gut to deep water in the Chesapeake 
Bay. 
A channel 4 feet deep at mean low water and 50 feet wide from Tylerton to 
Rhodes Point via Rhodes Point Gut. 
Modification providing for a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that 
depth in Tyler Creek to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth 
150 feet wide and 400 feet long at Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet 
wide from that depth in Shanks Creek to and including an anchorage basin of 
the same depth 100 feet wide and 400 feet long at Rhodes Point; channel 6 feet 
deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Big Thorofare River to Tylerton; 
channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from Rhodes Point to Tylerton. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 38, 
72nd Cong., 1st. Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 60, 
74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 444, 
82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. 
Annual Report for 
1895, p. 1167. 
H. Doc. 227, 
74th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 
H. Doc. 429, 
76th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 
H. Doc. 486, 
81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 2 
H. Doc. 286, 
89th Cong., 1st Sess. 
State Design 
memorandum 
July 2, 1986 
River and Harbor Act, 
June 29, 1888 as 
amended by Public 
Law 85-802, dated 
August 28, 1959 
Detailed Project 
Report, 
June 1981 
H. Doc. 51, 
82nd Cong., 1st Sess. 2 
Detailed Project 
Report, 
February 1968 
4-35 
17. 
19. 
20. 
21.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
May 13, 
1966 
Sec. 107 
Jul. 14, 
1960 
Oct. 20, 
1980 
Sec. 107 
Jul. 14, 
1960 
TILGHMAN ISLAND HARBOR, MD 
A channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in Harris Creek to and 
including two anchorage basins of the same depth, 300 feet by 70 feet and 500 
feet by an average width of 110 feet. 
Modification to provide for construction of a breakwater at the harbor entrance. 
WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC 
Aug. 30, Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 
1935 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington 
Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from 
Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with 
turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite 
Naval Weapons Plant, (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep 
and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 
15th Street SE Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia 
Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 
15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet 
gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush 
Washington Channel. 
25. 
Sep. 19, 
1890 
Jun. 25, 
1910 
Mar. 2, 
1919 
Jul. 3, 
1930 
WICOMICO RIVER, MD 
Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. 
Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the Salisbury 
Dam and turning basin. 
Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell Street, 
including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie 
Bay. 
A 12-foot channel below the Main Street Bridge. 
Aug. 26, A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and south prongs 
1937 and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the 
same depth. 
Sep. 3, Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet deep, 
1954 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a Tshaped 
harbor. 
ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND 
Nov. 17, Consists of a dune beginning at 27th Street extending north to the Delaware 
1986 line; a steel sheetpile bulkhead from 27th Street south to Fourth Street; and 
widened and raised beach from Third Street to just beyond the Delaware line. 
COLONIAL BEACH, VA 
Sep. 15, Extending and widening the existing Central Beach area, stabilizing the bank 
1980 behind the beachfill with vegetation, and constructing four segments of offshore 
breakwater; and extending and widening of the existing Castle Beach 
area, constructing three segments of offshore breakwater, removing debris in 
the beachfill area, and constructing a 100-foot long terminal groin at the 
southern end of Castlewood Park beachfill. 
Detailed Project 
Report, 
August 1965. 
Detailed Project 
Report, 
July 1980. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 22, 
74th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 
H. Doc. 20, 
51st Cong., 1st Sess., 
and Annual Report 
1890, p. 947 
H. Doc. 569, 
61st Cong., 2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 1509, 
63rd Cong., 3rd Sess. 
Senate Committee 
Print, 75th Cong., 
3rd Sess. 2 
H. Doc. 619, 
81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 2 
Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated 
Sept. 29, 1981 
Detailed Project 
Report, May 1980 
4-36 
23. 
24. 
29. 
30.

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
TOWN OF NORTH BEACH, MD 
Oct. 27, Construction of 1,200 linear feet of stone revetment adjacent to a failing sheet- 
1992 pile bulkhead. Project protects the roadway from storm damage. 
ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FLOOD PROTECTION AND 
NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, DC, AND MD 
May 17, Channel improvements, levees, pumping stations with connecting storm sewers, 
1950 pressure conduit and relocation and reconstruction of 4 highway bridges and 1 
railroad bridge. 
BROAD TOP REGION, PA 
Oct. 31, Pilot program to develop and carry out a watershed reclamation and protection, 
1992 and wetlands creation and restoration project using innovative reclamation 
technologies for the purposes of restoring, maintaining and protecting surface 
and ground water, including municipal water supplies, from adverse impacts 
related to acid mine drainage and other runoff. 
CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD 
Nov. 17, Contributes to multi-agency and private efforts to restore oyster populations in 
1986 the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay. 
Jun. 22, 
1936 
Jul. 24, 
1946 
Oct. 23, 
1962 
CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV 
Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, 
West Cumberland and South Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV. 
Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam 
and construct new industrial dam. 
JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD AND WV 
Construction of Bloomington Lake project. 
LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA 
Oct. 23, Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection 
1962 works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania. 
LOCK HAVEN, PA 
Nov. 17, Consists of 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along the 
1986 West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, seven ponding 
areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, 
necessary road and utility relocations, non-structural measures for Woodward 
and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. 
MOOREFIELD, WV 
Nov. 28. Levee, floodwall, closures, relocations and improvements to the flood warning 
1990 system. 
OLYPHANT, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA 
Oct. 31, Provides for 3,800 feet of earth levee, 1,400 feet of concrete floodwall, a closure 
1992 structure, interior drainage facilities, 1,500 feet of gabion slope protection and 
associated cultural mitigation and environmental restoration. 
Detailed Project 
Report, January 1989 
H. Doc. 202, 81st 
Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 101, 
73rd Cong., 1st Sess. 
Report on file in 
Office, Chief of 
Engineers. 
H. Doc. 469, 
87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 
S. Doc. 141, 
87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 187, 
98th Cong. 
Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated 
July 23, 1990 
Report of the Chief 
of Engineers dated 
June 29, 1992 
4-37 
31. 
32. 
33. 
34. 
35. 
36. 
37. 
38. 
39. 
40.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Jun. 4, 
1993 
PAXTON CREEK, PA 
Provides for an improved flood warning system. 
PETERSBURG, WV 
Nov. 28, Channel improvements, levee and floodwall, closures, relocations, and improve- 
1990 ments to the flood warning system. 
Oct. 23, 
1962 
RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA 
Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. 
SCRANTON, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA 
Oct. 31, Provides for 5,800 feet of earth levee, 1,700 feet of concrete floodwall, 3 closure 
1992 structures, interior drainage facilities, 2,700 feet of gabion slope protection, an 
improved flood warning system, removal of a railroad bridge, access ramp, and 
associated cultural mitigation. 
SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL 
RESORTATION 
Oct. 31, Pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests 
1992 in South Central Pennsylvania. 
SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Jun. 22, 
1936 
modified 
by Acts 
of Jun. 
28, 1938 
Aug. 18, 
1941; 
Dec. 22, 
1944; 
May 17, 
1950; and 
Jul. 3, 
1959 
Aug. 18, 
1941 
Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection 
of Binghamton, Hornell, Corning and other towns in New York and 
Pennsylvania. 
Detailed Project 
Report, March 1991 
Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated 
June 29, 1990 
H. Doc. 565, 
87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 
Report of the Chief 
of Engineers dated 
June 29, 1992 
H. Doc. 702, 
77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 
STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA 
Construction of a flood control reservoir. 
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA 
Jul. 3, Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hammond reservoirs, local flood pro- 
1958 tection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY and channel improvement at 
Cortland, NY. 
Oct. 22, Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to relo- 
1976 cate the Town of Nelson, PA, to a new townsite. 
Mar. 1, 
1983 
Sep. 3, 
1954 
Modification of Cowanesque Lake to include water supply as provided by Section 
4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (PL 78-534) and Section 301 of Water 
Supply Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). 
WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA 
Construction of three flood control reservoirs. 
H. Doc. 702, 
77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 394, 
84th Cong., 2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 29. 
84th Cong., 1st Sess. 
4-38 
41. 
42. 
43. 
44. 
45. 
46. 
47. 
48. 
49.

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
50. WYOMING VALLEY, PA (LEVEE RAISING) 
Nov. 17, Modification provides for raising existing levees and floodwalls between 3 and Report of the Chief 
1986 5 feet, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities and providing some of Engineers dated 
new floodwalls and levees to maintain the integrity of the existing flood con- October 19, 1983 
trol system. 
51. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA 
Jun. 22, Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on Codorus Creek. H. Doc. 702, 
1936 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 
1. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive portion is 
widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet from Port 
Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 
150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 
27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway 
Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at the upper end. 
2. Contains latest published maps. 
3. Included in Public Works Administration program September 
16, 1993. The site chosen for the inlet under this authorization 
was that opened just south of Ocean City by natural 
forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This eliminated the 
necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to Ocean City. 
4. Included in Emergency Relief Program 1935. 
5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above 
mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in 
1956. 
4-39

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 4-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
Cost to September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report Construction Maintenance 
Accotink Creek, VA1 Completed 1878 $ 5,000 $ - 
Anacostia River and Flats2 Deferred 1953 3,910,582 - 
Annapolis Harbor, MD Completed 1993 34,2503 51,366 
Aquia Creek, VA Inactive 1928 52,4654 11,770 
Back Creek, MD Completed 1946 23,061 41,378 
Black Walnut Harbor, MD Completed 1982 32,631 431,478 
Bonum Creek, VA Completed 1993 202,0005 456,576 
Branson Cove, 
Lower Machodoc River, VA Completed 1950 15,755 35,684 
Breton Bay, MD6 Completed 1950 47,9246 47,593 
Broad Creek River, DE Completed 1964 64,5107 163,482 
Cambridge Harbor, MD Completed 1993 195,9748 946,934 
Choptank River, MD9 Completed 1979 96,796 94,095 
Claiborne Harbor, MD1 Deferred 1987 42,974 709,047 
Corsica River, MD Completed 1948 39,07110 106,565 
Cypress Creek, MD Completed 1947 3,057 14,729 
Duck Point Cove, MD Completed 1982 25,289 338,038 
Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD11 Completed 1932 90,12112 53,80813 
Fishing Bay, MD Completed 1990 33,87414 1,606,876 
Goose Creek, MD15 Completed 1973 75,900 19,072 
Herring Creek, MD Completed 1989 1,506,259 168,436 
La Trappe, MD Completed 1980 8,06416 40,475 
Little Creek, Kent Island, MD Completed 1958 23,000 7,327 
Lowes Wharf, MD Completed 1986 2,100 322,080 
Lower Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1904 9,916 25,143 
Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD Completed 1988 1,787,15817 653,864 
Madison Bay, MD15 Completed 1977 125,550 33,353 
Manokin River, MD18 Completed 1919 34,78819 43,534 
Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD Completed 1947 38,71520 61,383 
Monroe Bay and Creek, VA Completed 1994 22,434 483,685 
Muddy Hood and Tyler Coves, MD Completed 1990 64,001 677,362 
Nan Cove, MD4 Completed 1965 34,86121 22,498 
Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD Completed 1983 240,817 142,131 
Neale Sound, MD Completed 1991 12,60022 923,373 
Neavitt Harbor, MD 15 Completed 1968 36,500 34,533 
Nomini Bay and Creek, VA23 Completed 1946 78,446 42,063 
Occoquan Creek, VA11 Completed 1971 66,25324 203,198 
Parish Creek, MD Completed 1988 19,17025 525,886 
Patuxent River, MD11 Completed 1905 14,00026 - 
Potomac River at Alexandria, VA Completed 1994 95,214 658,157 
Potomac River at Mount Vernon, MD27 Completed 1993 17,000 343,465 
Potomac River Below Washington, DC Completed 1993 153,836 2,281,294 
Potomac River and Tributaries at and 
below Washington, DC, Elimination 
of Waterchestnut Completed 1977 - 184,394 
Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD Completed 1920 10,234 6,216 
Potomac River North Side 
of Washington Channel, DC 1 Completed 1956 1,744,69228 27,46129 
Queenstown Harbor, MD Completed 1985 72,85830 321,803 
Rock Hall Harbor, MD Completed 1982 1,072,50031 73,430 
Shad Landing State Park, MD Completed 1966 33,53132 19,198 
Shallow Creek, MD 15 Completed 1989 278,100 - 
Slaughter Creek, MD Completed 1994 4,140 671,262 
St. Catherines Sound, MD Completed 1989 29,94733 659,369 
St. Georges Creek, MD Completed 1985 147,650 - 
St. Jeromes Creek, MD Completed 1991 44,35734 741,188 
St. Michaels Harbor, MD15 Completed 1964 16,72335 14,403 
St. Patricks Creek, MD Completed 1987 15,752 151,849 
St. Peters Creek, MD15 Completed 1963 46,74036 39,964 
4-40

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
TABLE 4-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
Cost to September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report Construction Maintenance 
Smith Creek, MD Completed 1936 5,252 16,448 
Susquehanna River 
above and below Havre De Grace, MD Completed 1985 293,57037 849,350 
Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA15 Completed 1974 57,03138 41,437 
Town Creek, MD Completed 1950 43,220 41,959 
Tred Avon River, MD Completed 1994 523,310 914,243 
Tuckahoe River, MD Completed 1980 9,727 23,489 
Twitch Cove and 
Big Thorofare, MD Completed 1992 193,175 3,372,892 
Tyaskin Creek, MD Completed 1923 16,29739 54,302 
Upper Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1971 20,281 34,777 
Upper Thorofare, MD Completed 1987 62,446 814,657 
Warwick River, MD Completed 1984 22,04140 148,728 
1. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 
August 5, 1977. 
2. Project deferred for restudy. 
3. Includes $8,476 for previous projects. 
4. Includes $31,065 for previous project. 
5. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. 
6. Includes $37,500 for previous project. 
7. Includes $50,000 for previous project. 
8. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds and includes 
$61,321 for previous projects. 
9. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the 
project was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 
1979.
10. Includes $30,000 for previous project. 
11. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 
November 2, 1979. 
12. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes 
$8,414 contributed funds. 
13. Includes $24,321 for previous project. 
14. Includes $2,839 for previous project. 
15. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 
16. Excludes $1,100 contributed funds. 
17. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 
18. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. doc. 467, 69th 
Cong., 1st Sess.) 
19. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. 
20. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department and 
$52,000 from contributed funds. 
21. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 
22. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 
23. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 
November 6, 1977. 
24. Includes $25,000 for previous project. 
25. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration 
funds. 
26. Includes $10,617 for previous project. 
27. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 
November 2, 1979. 
28. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 
29. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds 
expended for waterchestnut removal. 
30. Includes $19,000 for previous project. 
31. Excludes $672,880 contributed funds. 
32. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. 
33. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 
34. Includes $26,500 for previous project. 
35. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 
36. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 
37. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 
November 6, 1977. Includes $22,905 Works Progress funds and 
$97,390 for previous project. 
38. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. 
39. Excludes $10,158 contributed funds. 
40. Includes $6,000 for previous project. 
4-41

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH 
EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
Cost to September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report Construction Maintenance 
Oxford, MD1 Completed 1978 $ 97,7502 
1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 
2. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. 
TABLE 4-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Cost to September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report Construction Maintenance 
Anacostia River and Tributaries, 
Prince Georges Co., MD1 
Bainbridge, NY2 ,3 
Bath, NY 4 
Bayard, WV3 
Black Walnut Point, MD 
Bridgewater, VA3 
Bull Run, PA 
Chesapeake Bay at Hoopersville Road, MD 
Conklin-Kirkwood, NY3 
Cortland, NY 7 
Elkland, PA 
Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY 
Forest Heights, MD3 
Fourmile Run, VA 
Hills Point Road, Dorchester Co., MD2 
Greene, NY3 
Kingston-Edwardsville, PA 
Kitzmiller, MD3 
Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD3 
Latta Brook Rd., NY 
McCready's Point Road, MD 
Middle Hooper Island, MD 
Nichols, NY 
Norwich, NY3 
Painted Post, NY4 
Plymouth, PA 
Savage River Dam, MD 
Scranton, PA16 
Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA 
Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Luzerne County, PA 
Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD 
Sunbury, PA 
Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA 
Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock, PA 
Tyrone, PA22 
Unadilla, NY 
Upper Marlboro, MD3 
Verona Lake, VA24 
Washington, DC and Vicinity 
Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA 
Williamsport, PA 
Wyoming Valley, PA 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Deferred 
Completed 
Completed 
Deferred 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
1977 
1959 
1970 
1965 
1985 
1953 
1984 
1993 
1955 
1970 
1971 
1979 
1964 
1987 
1989 
1951 
1979 
1965 
1992 
1984 
1993 
1993 
1974 
1950 
1970 
1958 
1954 
1971 
1993 
1993 
1993 
1953 
1968 
1991 
1980 
1970 
1965 
1978 
1953 
1958 
1979 
1987 
$ 1,000,0002 
382,000 
638,332 
55,2185 
200,500 
136,500 
2,742,000 
156,4916 
71,000 
324,486 
1,297,850 
7,034,5348 
430,0009 
52,480,000 
186,077 
37,000 
4,731,39410 
501,50011 
972,988 
115,500 
74,01912 
327,16513 
1,487,800 
94,500 
414,181 
1,911,68914 
2,271,93915 
2,006,800 
425,96017 
70,44118 
126,04919 
6,063,00020 
2,728,113 
174,49121 
6,401,016 
1,000,00023 
590,013 
992,000 
331,92725 
3,853,45726 
12,964,89327 
25,549,098 
4-42 
TABLE 4-D 
33,999
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 
33,999

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
TABLE 4-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Cost to September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report Construction Maintenance 
1. Local interests will not accept operation and maintenance 
responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and 
sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is 
corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 
2. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 
3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 
4. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 
5. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds 
and $4,290 contributed funds. 
6. Excludes $67,954 Contributed funds. 
7. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 
8. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. 
9. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. 
10. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and 
excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to 
adoption of project. 
11. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. 
12. Excludes $42,081 contributed funds. 
13. Excludes $137,900 contributed funds. 
14. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. 
15. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. 
16. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 
17. Excludes $126,225 contributed funds. 
18. Excludes $25,014 contributed funds. 
19. Excludes $51,666 contributed funds. 
20. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. 
21. Excludes $53,383 contributed funds. 
22. The unconstructed portion of the project was reclassified 
to the deferred category January 8, 1981. 
23. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 
24. Authorized for the design memorandum state of 
advanced engineering and design. 
25. Cost of previous project. Includes $106,500 emergency 
relief funds. 
26. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes 
$36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work before 
adoption of project. 
27. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes 
$110,835 contributed funds. 
4-43

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 4-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Date Federal Contributed 
See Annual and Funds Funds 
Project Report For Authority Expended Expended 
Almond Village, NY1 ,2 
Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD 
(Ferry Bar & Spring Garden Channel) 
Betterton Harbor, MD 
Breton Bay, MD 
(1902 River & Harbor Act) 
Broadwater Creek, MD 
Cadle Creek, MD2 
Cambridge Harbor, MD 
(1948 River & Harbor Act) 
Channel Connecting Plain 
Dealing Creek and Oak 
Chester River, MD 
(1873 River & Harbor Act) 
Coan River, VA 
1970 
1920 
1960 
1950 
1949 
1949 
1989 
1940 
1988 
1937 
1970 
1978 
1977 
Copes Corner Lakes, NY2 
Cuckold Creek, MD4 
Cunninghill Cove, MD4 
Curwensville Lake (WaterLine), PA5 
Davenport Center Lake, NY2 1970 
Endicott, Johnson City, and Vestal (Remedial), NY5 
Fall Brook Lake, PA6 
Genegantslet Lake, NY 
Governors Run, MD 
Harpers Ferry, WV 
1970 
1954 
1950 
1937 
May 26, 1953 $ 24,6228 
1941 Flood 
Control Act 
Nov. 17, 1986 787,710 
1966 Water 
Reg. Dev. Act 
Dec. 31, 1989 3,482 
1986 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Dec. 31, 1989 10,424 
1986 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Nov. 6, 1977 212 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Nov. 6, 1977 - 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Dec. 31, 1989 - 
1986 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Aug. 5, 1977 112 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Dec. 31, 1989 25,419 
1986 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Aug. 5, 1977 - 
1914 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
May 6, 1981 106,7000 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Jan. 22, 1979 5,720 
1960 River 
and Harbor Act 
Jan 22, 1979 11,200 
1960 River 
and Harbor Act 
Nov. 18, 1991 - 
1986 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
May 6, 1981 286,4003 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Nov. 18, 1991- 
1986 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
May 6, 1981 46,100 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
May 6, 1981 214,5788 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Aug. 5, 1977 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Aug. 5, 1977 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
4-44

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
TABLE 4-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Date Federal Contributed 
See Annual and Funds Funds 
Project Report For Authority Expended Expended 
Hellens Creek, MD 
Lake Ogleton, MD 
1950 
1950 
Marsh Creek Bridge, Foster Joseph Sayers 
Dam, PA5 
Mill Creek, MD 
Moorefield, WV 
Neabsco Creek, VA 
(1881 River & Harbor Act) 
Ocean City Harbor and Inlet 
and Sinepuxent Bay, MD 
(1954 River & Harbor Act) 
Pocomoke River, MD 
(1945 River & Harbor Act) 
Pocomoke River, MD & VA 
(1954 River & Harbor Act) 
Saint Georges Creek, MD 
Sixes Bridge Lake, MD & PA7 
South Plymouth Lake, NY 
1949 
1941 
1978 
1989 
1989 
1989 
1971 
1974 
1953 
Susquehanna River, Sunbury Closure Structure, PA5 
Waterway from Little Choptank River to 
Choptank River, MD 
West Oneonta Lake, NY2 
1939 
1970 
Nov. 6, 1977 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Nov. 6, 1977 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Nov. 18, 1991 
1986 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Nov. 6, 1977 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Oct. 3, 1978 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Dec. 31, 1989 
1986 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Dec. 31, 1989 
1986 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Dec. 31, 1989 
1986 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Dec. 31, 1989 
1986 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Sep. 23, 1986 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Dec. 29, 1981 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
May 6, 1981 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Nov. 18, 1991 
1986 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
Aug. 5, 1977 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
May 6, 1981 
1974 Water 
Res. Dev. Act 
1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization 
expired May 26, 1958. 
2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 
3. Cost for preliminary work only. 
4. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief 
of Engineers. 
5. Project deauthorized by Section 1001(A) of Public 
Law 99-662. 
6. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 
7. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of 
advanced engineering and design. 
4-45 
7,9283 
14,600 
100,0363 
305 
189,1003

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 4-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS 
Date Survey 
Project Completed 
MARYLAND 
Breton Bay 
Fishing Bay 
Herring Creek 
Neale Sound 
Rock Hall Harbor 
Slaughter Creek 
St. Jerome Creek 
VIRGINIA 
Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River 
May 1995 
July 1995 
July 1995 
December 1994 
September 1995 
October 1994 
July 1995 
November 1994 
4-46

BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 
TABLE 4-I 
Project 
MARYLAND 
Anacostia River Basin 
Cumberland 
Forest Heights 
Kitzmiller 
Upper Marlboro 
NEW YORK 
Bainbridge-Newton Creek 
Bath-Cohocton River 
Cincinnatus 
Conklin-Kirkwood 
Coming-Monkey Run 
Cortland 
Endicott-Johnson City & Vestal 
Greene 
Nichols 
Norwich 
Owego 
Painted Post 
Port Dickinson 
Sherburne 
Unadilla 
PENNSYLVANIA 
Elkland 
Kingston-Edwardsville 
Milton 
Plymouth 
Scranton 
Sunbury 
Swoyersville-Forty Fort 
Tyrone 
Wilkes-Barre-Hanover Twp. 
Williamsport 
VIRGINIA 
Bridgewater 
Fourmile Run 
District of Columbia & MD Proejcts 
Anacostia River 
Washngton, DC & Vicinity 
WEST VIRGINIA 
Bayard 
Ridgeley 
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS 
Date Inspected 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
October 1994 
4-47 
1 _

NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT *
NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 
This district comprises the State of Virginia, 
except the Potomac, Roanoke, and Ohio River Basins; 
the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for 
the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. 
On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways 
south of Smith Point, VA, at the mouth of the Potomac 
River except. the project for Little Wicomico River, VA. 
North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to 
and including the mouth of the Meherin River, and the Dismal 
Swamp Canal Route. of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to 
the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River 
Basin. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
NAVIGATION PA 
1 Appomattox River, VA 
2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, 
VA and St. Johns River, FL 
3. Atlantic Intracoastal Bridge at Great Bridge, VA 
4. Channel to Newport News, VA 
5. Chincoteague Inlet, VA 
6. Greenvale Creek VA 
7. Hampton Roads, VA 
(Collection and Removal of Drift) 
8. James River, VA 
9. Lynnhaven Inlet, VA 
10. Norfolk Harbor and Channels, VA 
11. Pagen River, VA 
12. Quinby Creek, VA 
13. Rudee Inlet, VA 
14. Supervisor of the Harbor of lampton Roads 
(Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) 
15. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA 
16. Waterway on the Coast of VA 
17. Willoughby Channel, VA 
18. Navigation Work Under Special 
Authorization 
GE BEACH EROSION CONTROL 
5-2 19. Virginia Beach, VA (Hurricane Protection) 
20. Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement) 
5-2 FLOOD CONTROL 
5-3 21. James R. Olin Flood Control Project 
5-3 22. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA 
5-3 23. Richmond Local Flood Protection, VA 
5-4 24. Richmond Filtration Plant 
Flood Protection 
5-4 25. Emergency Flood Control Activities 
5-4 GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
5-5 26. Surveys 
5-5 27. Collection and Study of Basic Data 
5-6 TA B LES 
5-7 TABLE 5-A Cost and Financial Statement 
5-7 TABLE 5-B Authorizing Legislation 
5-7 TABLE 5-C Data Relative to the Completed 
5-8 
5-8 
5-8 
5-6 
5-9 
Locks 
TABLE 5-D Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects 
TABLE 5-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion 
Control Projects 
TABLE 5-F Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects 
TABLE 5-G Reconnaissance and Condition 
Surveys 
5-1 
PAGE 
5-9 
5-9 
5-10 
5-10 
5-10 
5-11 
5-11 
5-11 
5-11 
5-11 
5-12 
5-16 
5-20 
5-21 
5-23 
5-23 
5-24 
A\

NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 
Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
Navigation 
1. APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA 
Location. This river rises in Appomattox County, 
VA, flows northeasterly 137 miles, and empties into the 
James River at Hopewell, VA. The portion under 
improvement extends from its mouth to Petersburg, VA, a 
distance of 11 miles, which is the length of the tidal and 
navigable reach. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 
12251.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 469 of 
Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project. This provides for a channel 80 
feet wide and 10 feet deep from the mouth of the river to a 
point 400 feet above Lieutenant Run; thence 80 feet wide 
and of such depth, not exceeding 10 feet, as can be obtained 
without rock excavation to the head of navigation at 
Petersburg; including a basin at the mouth of Poes Run 200 
feet long, 150 feet wide, and 20 feet deep; and a turning 
basin at the mouth of Lieutenant Run 500 feet long, 140 to 
160 feet wide, and 12 feet deep in the upper 300 feet, the 
removal of rock to a depth of 18 feet in the north half of the 
lower 200 feet, and removal of soft material to rock in the 
south half of the lower 200 feet of this basin. All depths 
are referred to mean low water. 
The project also provides for a dam at Petersburg 
and the excavation for a width of from 200 to 300 feet of a 
diversion channel connecting the river above the dam with 
the river at a point 2.5 miles below; for about 1.7 miles of 
levees on the low grounds between the navigable and the 
diversion channels; for a highway bridge and a railway 
bridge across the diversion channel; and for other work 
incidental to the diversion channel. 
Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 
2.9 feet and the extremes 2.4 and 2.3 feet. There are no 
records available of the heights of stage due to ordinary 
floods. These are estimated at 6 to 8 feet above mean low 
water at Petersburg, where the extremes are from 15.6 feet 
to 17.1 feet. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For 
details see page 212 of Annual Report for 1969. 
5-2 
Terminal facilities. There are about 2,500 feet of 
wooden bulkhead and a shore landing in Petersburg Harbor. 
These facilities are in an abandoned, dilapidated condition 
and have not been used by commercial traffic on the river 
since 1950. There are two large recreational facilities now 
in operation on the Appomattox River. One is located about 
2 miles downstream from Petersburg, VA and the other is at 
Hopewell, VA near the confluence of the Appomattox and 
the James. 
Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of 
continuing the engineering studies of contaminated dredged 
material, with completion of these studies scheduled for FY 
1996. 
2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL 
WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, 
VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL 
(NORFOLK DISTRICT) 
Location. Two inland water routes approximately 
paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, VA between a 
point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, VA 2,500 feet 
upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia- 
North Carolina state line in North Landing River, a distance 
of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, 
VA and mouth of Pasquotank River, NC. These routes are 
shown on National Ocean Service Chart 12206. 
Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at m,: a low 
water and 90 to 250 feet wide following southern Branch of 
Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and 
North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of tidal 
guard lock at Great Bridge, VA. It also provides channels 10 
feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 100 feet wide in Deep 
Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles and Pasquotank River, 
35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to 
about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; 
protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and 
cutting curtain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its 
course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to 
Completed Locks included in Project.)

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams 
and bridges. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep 
Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being 
about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. 
Remaining sections are non-tidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 
feet in level due to winds. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered 
adequate. See Annual Report for FY 1970. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work 
consisted of operation and ordinary maintenance of the project 
consisting of real estate management services, condition and 
operation studies. Operation and care of locks, bridges, 
spillways, wharves, canal equipment, grounds, roads, 
buildings, etc. performed by contract. In addition, a contract 
for maintenance dredging the Lower Northlanding River 
segment of the waterway was awarded in November 1994 and 
completed in February 1995; a total of 350,784 cubic yards of 
material was removed. 
3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL 
WATERWAY BRIDGE AT GREAT 
BRIDGE, VA 
Location. The project is located in the City of 
Chesapeake, in the southeastern portion of Virginia. The 
City is bordered by the city of Suffolk on the west, the 
cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth on the North, the city of 
Virginia Beach on the east, and North Carolina on the south. 
The Federally owned Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 
highway bridge crosses the Albermarle and Chesapeake 
Canal in the community of Great Bridge. 
Existing project. The plan of improvement includes 
replacement of the existing 53-year old, U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers, 2-lane swing bridge with a 5-lane, double-leaf, 
rolling-lift bascule bridge, 2000 LF of approach roadway, 
utility relocations, and removal of the existing bridge. 
Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of 
Chesapeake)is required to assume OMRR&R responsibility 
on project completion in accordance with the provisions 
described in Section 339 of the National Highway System 
Designation Act of 1995. 
Operations during fiscal year. The Feasibility report 
was approved in Jul 94. Preconstruction engineering and 
design was initiated and in progress during FY 95. 
4. 
VA 
CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, 
Location. West of north entrance to Norfolk Harbor 
Channel, connects deep water in James River with Hampton 
Roads. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12245.) 
Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existing project. Dredging a channel 55 feet deep at 
mean low water and 800 feet wide from Norfolk Harbor 
Channel in Hampton Roads to Newport News, a distance of 
about 4.5 miles, and two deep-draft anchorage berths opposite 
Newport News 45 feet deep over a 1,200-foot swinging radius. 
Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and 
extremes 2.1 and 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations 
due to combined wind and tides, referred to mean low water, 
are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the 
channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was 
completed December 2, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia 
Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in 
accordance with the provisions described in the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, for 
additional deepening. 
Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11. (Revised 
1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water 
Resources Support Center. 
Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of 
condition surveys of the project, and preparation of plans for 
dredging the 40-Ft. Anchorages Opposite Newport News 
during Fiscal Year 1996. 
5. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA 
Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of 
Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from 
the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, VA. (See 
National Ocean Service Chart 12211.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep 
and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean 
and to the mouth of the inlet, a channel 9 feet deep and 1 00 
feet wide from the inlet through the canal, and then along 
Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet 
north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteague, a distance 
of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All 
depths are referred to mean low water. 
5-3

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
Local cooperation. For details see Annual Report for 
1974. 
Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague 
are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to 
dredge the entrance channel was awarded in March and 
completed in April; a total of 120,000 cubic yards of material 
was removed. 
6. GREENVALE CREEK, VA 
Location: A tidal estuary that enters the north side of 
Rappahannock River about 20 miles above its mouth. It is 
wholly in Lancaster County, Virginia about 60 miles north of 
Norfolk, Virginia. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 
12237.) 
Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low 
water and 60 feet wide from that depth in Rappahannock River 
about 950 feet to the mouth of Greenvale Creek, then 6 feet 
deep and 60 feet wide from the mouth into the creek for 
about 2,400 feet. 
Local cooperation: Fully complied with. For details 
see Annual Report for 1965. 
Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered 
adequate. For details see page 215 of Annual Report for 1969. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
dredging contract was awarded in February and completed in 
March 1995; a total of 13,621 cubic yards of material was 
removed. 
7. HAMPTON ROADS, VA 
COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF 
DRIFT
Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 
miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, 
D.C. Its principal tributaries are James River, affording a 
natural deep harbor at Newport News, VA: Elizabeth River, 
with its Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing 
harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, VA; and Hampton Creek, 
serving the harbor at Hampton, VA. (See National Ocean 
Service Chart Nos. 12248,12245 and 12253.) 
Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in 
Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the 
Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work 
from appropriations for main-other available appropriations 
and that this work shall be carded on as a separate and distinct 
project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of 
work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstr:tion. 
No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor. VA and 
Channel to Newport News, VA. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Operation of the project resulted in collection and disposal of 
a variety of floating refuse. Operations were performed using 
government plant and hired labor. 
8. JAMES RIVER, VA 
Location. The river is formed by the junction of 
the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, 
VA, flows east 340 miles and empties into Hampton Roads 
at Newport News, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 
Nos. 12248 and 12251.) 
Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 300 
feet wide from the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, 
and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the 
Deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock, a mooing basin 35 
feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,1 00 feet long 
alongside the channel opposite waterfront at HIlopewell; 
enlargement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater 
Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep; 
a turning basin in Richmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 
feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and 
training dikes. Depth of channels are referred to main low 
water. Total length of channel included in the project is 87 
miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges 
under ordinary conditions for different parts of the ri',er are: 
mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and 
Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary 
conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; 
Jamestown, 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. 
Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, due to floods 
are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme 
fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below 
Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to 
available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 
14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. 
For previous projects, see Annual Report for 1938. 
local cooperation. Fully complied with for 
conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1962. 
However, the local sponsor (Richmond Port Authority) is 
required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the 
provisions described in the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986, as amended. Deepening the project from 25 
feet to 35 feet, and the widening, authorized by the River 
5-4

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
and Harbor Act of 1962 has not been started. 
Terminal facilities. River commerce at Richmond 
is handled by city-owned wharves within or in the 
immediate vicinity of Richmond Harbor. The city's Upper 
Terminal, located on the north bank within the 
manufacturing section of Richmond, provides for 750 feet of 
concrete wharf and 80,000 square feet of warehouse and 
transit shed. The other terminal is located approximately 4 
miles downstream from the Upper Terminal which provides 
about 1,250 feet of wharf and 2 concrete warehouses with 
about 1 90,000 square feet of floor space. This deepwater 
terminal at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel 
serves oceangoing vessels and larger ships engaged in coastwide 
trading. Below the deepwater terminals the 
improvement is served by 42 wharves. Richmond terminals 
and wharves together with wharves between Richmond and 
the river's mouth are adequate for river's commerce. (See 
National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248 and 12251.) 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
contract was awarded in October 1994 and completed in 
November 1994 for dredging a total of 33,427 cubic yards 
of material from Turkey Island Cutoff; a contract was 
awarded November 1994 and completed December 1994 for 
dredging a total of 712,902 cubic yards of material from 
Dancing Point - Swann Point Shoal Channel; and a contract 
was awarded in August 1995 and will be completed in FY 
1996 for dredging Richmond Harbor, Richmond Deepwater 
Terminal, and Turkey Island Cutoff. In addition to 
maintenance dredging, work also included condition surveys, 
environmental and archaeological studies, and engineering 
and design for FY 96 dredging. 
9. LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA 
Location. On the south shore of the Chesapeake 
Bay, 5 miles west of Cape Henry, and 10 miles east of 
Norfolk, VA, the inlet connects Lynnhaven Roads, a part of 
the Chesapeake Bay, with a network of inland waters in the 
northern half of the city of VA Beach. (See National Ocean 
Survey Chart 12254.) 
Existing project. An entrance channel from 
Chesapeake Bay through Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep and 
150 feet wide; a mooring and turning basin inside of 
Lynnhavcn Inlet, 10 feet deep, 1,100 feet long, and 750 feet 
wide; a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide to extend from 
the mooring and turning basin into Broad Bay via Long 
Creek-Broad Bay Canal and a channel through the Narrows 
connecting Broad and Linkhorn Bays, 6 feet deep and 90 
feet wide. Depths are referred to mean low water. Mean 
range of tide in Lynnhaven Inlet is about 2 feet with 
extreme fluctuations of 1.5 feet below and 9.5 feet above 
mean low water. Range in Lynnhaven Bay is a little more 
than 2 feet, in Broad and Linkhom Bays, fluctuations in 
water level are caused by local winds. (See Table 5-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Complied with, except local 
interest must furnish spoil-disposal areas as needed for 
future maintenance. For details see page 308 of Annual 
Report for 1965. 
Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are 
considered adequate. For details see page 308 of Annual 
Report for 1970 
Operations during fiscal year. Cultural resource 
investigations of a submerged shipwreck were conducted 
within the entrance channel, and determined that the wreck 
has historic value. The channel will be realigned during a 
future fiscal year. 
10. NORFOLK HARBOR AND 
CHANNELS, VA. 
Location. Norfolk, VA is 187 miles south of 
Baltimore, MD and 30 miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay 
at Cape Charles and Cap Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles 
from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet 
above Norfolk and Western Railway bridge over a Southern 
Branch of Elizabeth River. (See National Ocean Service Chart 
Nos. 12245 and 12253.) 
Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 
1938.
Existing project. For details see Annual Report for 1993. 
HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER: A 
channel 55 feet deep and 1,500 feet wide from that depth in 
Hampton Roads to a point approximately 6.3 miles upstream 
from the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel; thence 55 feet deep 
and 800 feet wide to Lamberts Point; thence 45 feet deep and 
750 feet wide to the junction of Southern Branch and Eastern 
Branch. 
EASTERN BRANCH: A channel 25 feet deep and 
500 feet wide from the junction of the branches to Norfolk and 
Western Railway Bridge, from the Norfolk and Western 
Railway Bridge a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to 
the Campostella Bridge, channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet 
wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge (formerly 
Virginian), including a turning basin 25 feet deep and 
approximately 5.5 acres in size located at the upstream end of 
the project. 
5-5

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
WESTERN BRANCH: A channel 24 feet deep and 
300 feet wide to a point 0.78 mile from the 40-foot channel, 
thence 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for a distance of 0.38 
mile; thence 18 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 0.57 mile to 
a point 0.34 mile above the West Norfolk Bridge. 
SCOTTS CREEK: A channel 12 feet deep at mean 
low water and 100 feet wide from the 40-foot channel for a 
distance of 0.73 mile. 
ANCHORAGE, SEWELLS POINT: Three fixed 
mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each 
capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; 
two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a 
swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of 
the 55-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 
acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet 
deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one 
space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and 
45-acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. 
SOUTHERN BRANCH: The southern branch of the 
Elizabeth River generally oriented and flows south to north, 
and in the vicinity of this project is bordered on the east bank 
by the City of Chesapeake. The Southern Branch 40 Foot 
Deepening element will deepen a 2.5 mile section of the 
Elizabeth River from its current depth of 35 feet to 40 feet 
between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge at mile 15, 
upstream to the U.S. Routes 460 and 13 highway bridge (also 
known as Gilmerton Bridge) at mile 17.5. This reach of the 
channel ranges in width between 250 and 500 feet, with an 
average width of 300 feet. The channel will be widened at 
selected points to permit vessels to safely negotiate bends. At 
mile 17.5, in the vicinity of the Gilmerton Bridge, an 800 foot 
turning basin with a depth of 40 feet will be constructed. In 
addition, the possible need for modifying the Gilmerton Bridge 
will be explored as part of this project. 
Operations during fiscal year. Planning, engineering and 
design continued. A draft Limited Re-evaluation Report (LRR) 
was submitted for approval. Coordination continued with the 
local sponsor and other agencies regarding scheduling of 
additional deepening 
Anchorages: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities 
with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two 
large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells 
Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; 
anchorage area on the west side of the 55-foot channel 
opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of 
open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 
1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet 
long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and a 45-acre 
anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. 
Operations during fiscal year. The District forwarded 
recommendations for pursuing the engineering and design, 
plans and specifications, and construction of the proposed 50- 
foot anchorage improvements. Coordination continued with 
the sponsor and other agencies regarding dredge material 
management alternatives. 
Disposal area: A disposal area of about 2,500 acres 
adjacent to and north of Craney Island, enclosed by stonefaced 
levee of sand; rehandling basin, approach and exit 
channels connecting rehandling basin and Norfolk Harbor 55- 
foot channel and hopper dredge unloading facility. 
Operations during fiscal year. Lower Bay Beneficial 
Uses Study was completed in August 1994. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging 
the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was 
completed December 15, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia 
Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in 
accordance with the provisions described in the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended for 
additional deepening. 
Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11 (revised 
1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water 
Resources Support Center. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
contract to dredge the Norfolk HIlarbor Channel in Hampton 
Roads and the Elizabeth River was awarded in FY 1994 and 
completed in February 1995; a total of 1,538,153 cub; yards 
of material was removed, including an estimated 400,000 
removed during FY 1994. A contract was awarded in August 
1995 and completed in October 1995 for the dredging of the 
Norfolk Harbor Channel and the Sewells Point Anchorage; a 
total of 1,205,190 cubic yards of material were removed. A 
contract to dredge the Southern Branch 35-Ft. Channel was 
awarded in August and will be completed in FY 1996. In 
addition to maintenance dredging, work also included 
condition surveys, environmental studies, and engineering and 
design for FY 96 dredging. 
11. PAGAN RIVER, VA 
Location. This river, a tidal stream uses in Isle of Wight 
County, Va., flows northeast 1 0 miles, and empties into the 
James River. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12248.) 
Previous projects. For further details see page 1798 of 
Annual Report for 1915, page 442 of Annual Report for 1937, 
and page 526 of Annual Report for 1940. 
Existing project. This provides for a channel having a width 
of 80 feet and a depth of 1 0 feet at mean low water between 
the wharf of the Smithfield, Newport News & Norfolk 
5-6

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
Steamship Co. (formerly the Old Dominion Steamship Co.) at 
Smithfield, and the 10-foot contour in James River, a distance 
of about 6 2/3 miles. Under ordinary conditions the mean 
tidal range is 2.7 feet. No data for extreme ranges of tides are 
available. 
Terminal facilities. There are 16 wharves or landings 
on this river, of which 14 are at Smithfield, Va., and 2 at 
Battery ark, about I mile above the rivers mouth. The length 
of dockage available at Smithfield is about 1, I 00 feet. At 
Battery Park the length of dockage is about 85 feet. The 
facilities are considered adequate for present and prospective 
requirements. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging 
contract was awarded in Aug. 94 and completed in November 
1994; a total of 60,289 cubic yards of material was removed. 
12. QUINBY CREEK 
Location: A natural channel on Atlantic Ocean 
side of Delmarva Peninsula about 32 miles north of Cape 
Charles; and about 33 miles south of Chincoteague, VA, Creek 
extends in a generally southeasterly direction between Quinby 
Landing at Quinby, VA and head of the Tony Rock Drain, in 
Upshur Bay, a distance of 6,900 feet (see National Ocean 
Service Chart No. 12210.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep in 
Upshur Bay to a point 600 feet bayward from Quinby 
Landing, thence 60 feet wide to Quinby Landing, a total 
distance of about 6,900 feet and turning and mooring basin of 
the same depth, 200 feet wide and 400 feet long opposite 
public terminal and landing. Mean range of tide is 4.4 feet. 
Existing project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of 
1950. (I. Doc. 241, 81st Cong., 1st sess. which contains 
latest published map.) Project is complete, for details see 
Annual Report for 1964. 
Local cooperation: Fully complied with for initial 
construction. Local interests provide spoil areas for 
maintenance. 
Terminal facilities. There are two open-pile wooden 
wharves and about 125 feet of wooden bulkhead at Quinby, 
VA, which are privately owned. In addition, a number of 
berthing spaces, a wooden dock and launching ramp were 
constructed and open to all on equal terms. These facilities 
were connected to the State Highway system by a suitable 
access road and are considered adequate. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging 
contract was awarded in March and completed in May 1995; 
a total of 85,024 cubic yards of material was removed. 
13. RUDEE INLET, VA 
Location. Rudee Inlet is located on the Atlantic 
Ocean at Virginia Beach in an area where boating is a major 
activity. It provides a gateway to a variety of oceanic pursuits 
varying from pleasure cruising to commercial deep sea fishing. 
Existing project. An entrance channel 10-ft deep, 10 
to 72-ft wide and 1605-ft long; an inner channel 7-ft deep, 72 
to 53-ft wide and 2,495-ft long including a safety area 7-ft 
deep, and approximately 1.9 acres in size and a turning basin 
7-ft deep, 175-ft wide and 1,570-ft long; a sand trap 18-ft deep 
and approximately 3.3 acres in size; and a weir and jetty 
system at the mouth of the inlet. 
Local cooperation. Complied with for initial dredging 
as a Federal project in fiscal year 1991. Local interests are to 
financially participate in continued annual maintenance as 
described in the Local Cooperation Agreement. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
contract to dredge the entrance channel and sand trap was 
awarded in March and completed in May 1995; a total of 
73,545 cubic yards of material was removed. 
14. SUPERVISOR OF NORFOLK 
HARBOR (PREVENTION OF 
OBSTRUCTIVE AND I N J U RIOU S 
DEPOSITS) 
The District Engineer, Norfolk District, was 
designated Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads under 
the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 
(33 U.S.C. 441-451) as amended July 12,1952. Under this 
Act, the Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads is 
charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of 
obstructive and injurious materials in the tidal waters of the 
harbors of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Newport News, Hampton 
Roads, and their adjacent and tributary waters, so much of the 
Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the State of 
Virginia, and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries 
as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States within or to 
the east of the State of Virginia. The River and Harbor Act of 
March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403,407,409) as amended prohibits 
obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized 
structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and sinking of 
vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of Norfolk 
Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, The 
Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the 
5-7

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife 
Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National 
Historic Prevention Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act 
of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic 
Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. 
Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of 
the Norfolk District was accomplished by means of two patrol 
vessels performing inspections, removing debris and 
investigating navigational hazards and sunken abandoned 
vessels. A derrick boat and crane barge performed removal of 
sunken vessels and navigational hazards and supported Federal 
dredging projects. In addition, surveillance of the harbor was 
performed regarding the Corps' regulatory program, using 
alsotwo small outboard craft, motor vehicles from land and 
occasional chartered aerial reconnaissance. This regulatory 
surveillance involved compliance surveys of permitted 
activities and evaluation of navigational impacts of proposed 
piers and other structures. 
15. THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA 
Location. In lower portion of Chesapeake Bay between 
Hampton Roads and the ocean, 20 miles northeast of center of 
Norfolk harbor, extending southeasterly 12 milesfrom a point 
1.25 miles cast of Thimble Shoal lighthouse toward entrance 
to Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 
12222.) 
Existing pmroject. Provides for dredging a channel 12 
miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 55 feet deep at mean low 
water. To date the 650-ft. wide outbound lane has been 
deepened and maintained to a depth of 50 feet, and the 
remaining 350-ft. width is maintained at a 45-ft. depth under 
the previous project. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal 
range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular 
fluctuation, due to combined wind and tides referred to mean 
low water, and minus 3 feet and plus 7 feet. For details of 
previous projects see Annual Report for 1932. (See Table 5-B 
or Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Project serves as an entrance channel 
to Hampton Roads. "See Norfolk Harbor, Va.' 'Channel to 
N wport News, VA.,' etc. 
Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Work consisted 
of condition surveys and monitoring of the ocean dump 
site required by the EPA, and engineering and design in 
preparation for FY 1996 maintenance dredging. 
16. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF 
VIRGINIA 
Location. Between barrier beach along Atlantic 
Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula 
on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of 
Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, thoroughfares 
and bays to enter Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman 
Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the 
peninsula. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12210, 
12211, and 12221.) 
Existing projects. An inland waterway 6 feet deep at 
mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to 
Chincoteague Bay, VA. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. 
Greater fluctuations in water level are caused by high winds 
and storms. A modification of the project approved during 
170 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 
authorized relocation of portions of the waterway and 
widening of 100 feet. 
Local cooperation. Complied with except that local 
interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future 
maintenance. 
Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered 
adequate.Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
dredging contract was awarded in May 1995 and completed in 
June 1995 to dredge Gull Marsh, North, Sloop, and Eckichy 
Marsh Channels; a total of 230,385 cubic yards of material 
was removed from these channels. 
17. WILLOUGHBY CHANNEL, VA 
Location. This channel is located in Hampton Roads 
and extends from deep water, in Hampton Roads to the 
entrance to Willoughby Bay. (See National Ocean Service 
Chart No. 12245.) 
Existing project. This provides for dredging a 
channel 10 feet deep at mean low water, over a bottom width 
of 300 feet, from deep water in Hampton Roads to a point 
opposite the extreme tip of Willoughby Spit. Under ordinary 
conditions the mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and the extremes -2 
and +9.5 feet. 
Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Willoughby 
Bay are considered adequate for current and prospective 
traffic. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
dredging contract was awarded in August 1994 and completed 
in December 1994; a total of 20,679 cubic yards of material 
was removed. 
5-8

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
18. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
The District continued work on four section 107 
(navigation) studies: Hunting/Guilford Creeks, VA. (initiation 
of plans and specs has been delayed until the local sponsor 
obtains funds to provide their portion of implementation 
costs); Newport News Creek, VA (Draft Feasibility Report was 
submitted for review); York and Pamunkey Rivers, VA (study 
progressed to plans and specifications phase); and Back River, 
Poquoson, VA (Reconnaissance Report was approved and 
negotiations with the local sponsor for a Federal Cost Sharing 
Agreement (FCSA) are underway. One new Section 107 
project. Tangier Island, North Channel Breakwater, Accomack 
Co. VA was initiated. Three Section 1135 (modifications for 
improvement to the environment) studies were initiated. 
James River Oyster Restoration, VA (Initial Appraisal Report 
IAR) was submitted for approval); Gathright Waterfowl and 
Bat Habitat, VA and Gathright Fish Habitat, VA were both 
terminated due to a lack of local support. One section 205 
(Flood Control) Study, James River, Buchanan, Botetouk Co, 
VA was initiated and is currently in the reconnaissance phase. 
19. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 
(HURRICANE PROTECTION) 
Location. The city of Virginia Beach is located on 
the south eastern coast of Virginia bordered by the Atlantic 
Ocean on the east, Chesapeake Bay on the north, the cities of 
Norfolk and Chesapeake on the west, and North Carolina on 
the south (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) 
Existing project. The plan of improvement includes 
construction of a vertical steel sheet-pile wall with concrete 
cap extending from Rudee Inlet to 58th Street, enhancement of 
the existing dune system between 58th Street and 89th Street, 
construction and periodic renourishment of a widened and 
raised beach berm between Rudee Inlet and 89th Street, a new 
boardwalk integrated with the vertical wall which will be 
placed seaward of the existing boardwalk extending from 
Rudee Inlet to approximately 40th Street, a storm water runoff 
system consisting of the offshore discharge by pumped flow 
through submarine pipelines, appropriate beach access structures 
consisting of ramps and stairs and dune crossover 
facilities.
Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of 
Virginia Beach) is required to furnish cost sharing in 
accordance with the provisions described in The Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986. 
Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction 
engineering and design were in progress. The General Reevaluation 
Report, which incorporates the locally preferred 
plan, was approved in Jul 94. 
20. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, 
(REIMBURSEMENT) 
Location. The city of Virginia Beach is located on 
the southeastern coast of Virginia bordered by the Atlantic 
Ocean on the east, Chesapeake Bay on the north, the cities of 
Norfolk and Chesapeake on the west, and North Carolina on 
the south. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) 
Existing project. The periodic nourishment program 
is a modification of the original project adopted by the 1954 
River and Harbor Act, which provided for beach restoration 
and the deferred construction of a system of drains. 
Comparative cost studies of groin construction versus periodic 
nourishment indicate that the later is the more suitaluie and 
economical method for maintaining share stability, protecting 
property, and insuring maximum recreation benefits from use 
of the publicly-owned shores. The current project includes 
periodic nourishment of approximately 3.3 miles of beach 
between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street with maintenance of the 
berm to a minimum width of approximately 100 feet of 
elevation 7 feet above mean low water. 
Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor is the 
city of Virginia Beach. The original Project Cooperation 
Agreement (PCA) expired 6 February 1987. Consistent with 
Section 934 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, 
a new PCA was required. Ten additional years of Federal 
participation in periodic nourishment cost sharing were 
approved on 10 March 1988 by the Assistant Secretary of the 
Army for Civil Works. A PCA for the extension of periodic 
nourishment was executed on 9 August 1993. Article VII of 
the 9 August 1993 PCA states The Government shall not be 
obligated to budget for appropriations to reimburse the Local 
Sponsor for, and costs incurred by the Local Sponsor for 
periodic nourishment after February 6, 1987, and before 
execution of this agreement. The Government shall reimburse 
the Local Sponsor for such'costs only when specifically 
directed by Congress in legislation and when appropriations 
are made available for such purpose.' 
Operations during fiscal year. The Federal shares 
(65%) of the 1994 renourishment cost was reimbursed to the 
city of Virginia Beach. Total cost was $759,402. 
5-9

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
21. JAMES R. OLIN FLOOD CONTROL 
PROJECT, VA. 
Location. The city of Buena Vista is on the left 
bank of the Maury River, 40 miles below the rivers origin and 
about 11 miles upstream of its juncture with the main stem of 
the James River at the community of Glasgow. The Maury 
River Basin above Buena Vista contains a drainage area of 
about 840 square miles. 
Existing projects. The project will provide a system 
of floodwalls and levees on the left bank and channel 
modifications to provide flood protection against a flood equal 
to the August 1969 event which is the maximum flood of 
recent record. The programmed portion of the project (lower 
element) consists of a combination levee/floodwall with 
controlled channelized flow of interior drainage and channel 
refinement to the Maury River. The unprogrammed portion of 
the project (upper element) consists of a concrete ringwall 
around the Georgia Bonded Fibers plant. 
Local cooperation. The local sponsor(city'of Buena 
Vista) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with 
the provisions described in the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986, as amended, for project construction, and 
maintain and operate all works after completion. The Project 
Cooperation Agreement (PCA) for the programmed portion of 
the project was executed on February 17, 1994. 
Operations during fiscal year. The programmed lower 
element will be constructed in two phases; Phase I consists of 
channel refinements to the Maury River; Phase 11 consists of 
the levee, floodwall, closures and interior drainage canal. 
Construction bfor Phase I is 85 percent complete and Phase II 
is 10 percent complete. 
22. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE 
MOOMAW, VA 
Location. Gathright Dam is on the Jackson River, a 
tributary of James River at mile 43.4 in Allegheny County. 
Gathright Dam site is in the reach of the Jackson River known 
as the Gorge, about 19 miles upstream from Covington, VA. 
At the elevation of the top of the conservation pool, the lake 
extends upstream about 9 miles. (See Falling Spring and 
Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virginia quadrangles of 
geological survey.) 
Existing project. Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172- 
foot long, rolled-rock-fill dam with an impervious core, with 
the top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a 
concrete intake structure located in the right bank 500 feet 
upstream from the axis of the dam: a 1,075-foot long outlet 
tunnel through the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 
2,450-foot long fixed-crest emergency spillway excavated in 
a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch about 2.5 miles 
south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation 
poot elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality 
control. The reservoir adea at elevation 1,582 will be 2,530 
acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between 
elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will 
be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the 
reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Care of service and 
recreational facilities, water control management, testing and 
monitoring, supervision and administration and engineering 
and design. 
23. RICHMOND LOCAL FLOOD 
PROTECTION, VA 
Location. The city of Richmond, the capital of 
Virginia, is located in the Piedmont Plateau and is bordered on 
the north by 1-lenrico County and on the south by Chesterfield 
County. The James River flows directly through Richmond 
separating its business district into two areas, the Shockoe 
Creek area on the north. 
Previous project. None. 
Existing project. The project will provide a system 
of floodwalls and levees on both sides of the river in the 
downtown area which would protect against a flood higher 
than that which occurred in June 1972 which is the maximum 
flood of recent record. The project to be constructed is that 
generally described in house Document 98-178, 98th Congress, 
2nd Session with modifications recommended by the Assistant 
Secretary of the Army on February 21, 1984. The present 
construction cost of the project is now estimated at 
$140,204,000. 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
was signed with the city of Richmond on June 16,1986. For 
details see Annual Report for 1986. 
Operations during fiscal year. Construction was 
initiated November 1988. The final contract to remove 
contaminated soil and construct the remaining 800 feet of 
floodwall on the south side of the project area was awarded 
November 1993. Contract completion and physical completion 
of the project is scheduled for February 1995. 
5-10

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
24. RICHMOND FILTRATION PLANT, 
VA 
Location: The Richmond Water filtration Plant is 
located in the city of Richmond, VA bordered on the north by 
Henrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. 
Existing project: As a result of Tropical Storm 
Agnes in June 1972, the water filtration plant was flooded and 
the estimated 400,000 population served was without potable 
water supply for over five days and without fire protection for 
over three days. The project will provide flood protection of 
the municipal water supply treatment plant from a flood 
having a recurrence of 360 years. The project will provide 
Hlood protection by enclosing three sides of the water filtration 
plant with a floodwall and tying into high ground. The wall 
will have an average height of about nine feet with a top 
elevation of 117 feet MSL. The project will be built through 
one contract over two years. 
Local cooperation: The city of Richmond, Virginia 
is the local sponsor, a Project Cooperation Agreement was 
executed on October 21, 1994. 
Operation during the fiscal year: In FY 95, Congress 
added $2,000 000 for construction of the project. The 
Administration does not support funding for the project 
because the lack of flood protection at the filtration plant is 
considered a design deficiency and should be undertaken by 
local interests. A construction contract was awarded on July 
31, 1995. 
26. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL 
ACTIVITIES 
During FY 95, $204,876 was spent on the National 
Emergency Preparedness Program, and $277,544 on the 
Disaster Preparedness Program. 
27. GENERAL INVESTIGATION 
SURVEYS 
Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted 
to $690,359. The work performed consiste Navigation 
Studies, $17,357; Flood Damage Prevention Studies, 5,518; a 
Shoreline Protection Study of the Chesapeake Bay Shoreline, 
Hampton, VA., $185,924; Special Studies, $325,438; review 
of the AIWW Bridge Replacement, $10,766; special 
investigations, $30,127; Intragency Water Resources 
Development, $47,367; National Marine Fisheries Services, 
$8,8 19; and Coordination with Other Agencies and 
Cooperation with States, $59,041. 
28. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
BASIC DATA 
During the fiscal year, cost of collection and study 
of basic data was $190,288 consisting of flood plan 
management studies including Quick Responses, Management 
Service Unit, Technical Services and Environmental Data 
Studies. 
5-11

NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 
TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
Total Cost 
Section Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 To 30 Sep 1995 
In Text 
1. Appommattox River. VA 
(Regular Funds) 
2. Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway. between 
Norfolk, VA and the 
St. John's River, FL 
(Norfolk District) 
(Regular Funds) 
3. Broad Creek. VA 
(Contributed Funds) 
4. Channel to 
Newport News, VA 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
5. Chincoteague Inlet, VA 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint
Approp 
Cost 
Major-Rehab 
Approp 
Cost 
Recreation 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
870.341 
870.341 
1,673,600 
1.670.788 
777.234 213,234 254,240 6,053.576 
743,971 255.811 253.492 6,046.939 
3.866.32 
3,688.372 
3.562.589 
3,590,029 
181, 168 2.236,223 3,439.227 66.776,151 
244,056 2.199.532 3.423.908 70,080.089 
479.94- 
479.94- 
59.8-1 
59.S1 
276.868 
276.868 
771.14- 
771.14- 
500 
500 
4,097.11 
4,097.1 1" 
1,270,326 
1,271.031 
2864,6 48.518 40.311 7.541.695 
286.282 286.282 40.311 7.541.695 
- - - 4,918.544 
4.695.105 
227.0 
227.00 
1,412,747 
1.412,571 
906,104 663,017 958.169 12,799.8- 
906.950 663.651 958.169 12.798.8"'- 
3.850 
3 850 
5-12 
1/ 
2/
4/

TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
Total Cost 
Section Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY.94 FY 95 To 30 Sep 1"Y5 
In Text 
6. Hampton Roads. VA 
(Collection and 
Removal of Drift) 
7. James River. VA 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
8. Lynnhaven River, VA 
9. Nansemond River. VA 
10. Norfolk Harbor. VA 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
11. Pagan River. VA 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint
Approp 
Cost 
Maint
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
496,000 
485,169 
615,000 615,000 
621,892 618,673 
610.000 6.341.384 
604,751 6.335.869 
7.639.904 
7.639.904 
1,517,949 960,566 3.074.552 
1,518,707 521,945 3.113,527 
1.884.077 41.42.843 
1.878,870 41.017.593 
- - 8,000 
- 124.767 
- 672.504 
- 681.842 
504.559 
504.559 
445.354 
445.354 
4.356.370 
342.205 
167.477 
167.477 
579.891 
5-9.891 
- 322,415 
- 322.415 
100,000 250,000 1.100,000 
290,672 247,459 625,800 
425.,000 8.570.632 
632.230 8.098.815 
3,354,059 5,623.170 6.027,725 1.829.748 110.091.326 
3,360,293 5.614.531 6.064,496 1.829,748 110.089.815 
- - - - 1.805,451 
-- - - 1.762,697 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
- 34,230 446,169 
- 134,229 446,170 
30.754 
30.754 
836,813 
836.813 
5-13 
4/ 
4/

TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
Total Cost 
Section Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 To 30 Sep 1995 
In Text 
12. Ruddee Inlet, VA 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
13. Supervision of the 
Harbor of Hampton 
Roads. VA (Prevention 
of Obstructive and 
Injurious Deposits) 
14. Thimble Shoal 
Channel, VA 
(Regular Funds) 
15. Waterway on the 
Coast of VA 
(Regular Funds) 
16. Whitings Creek. VA 
(Contributed Funds) 
17. Willoughby Channel, VA 
18. Navigation Work 
Under Special 
Authorization 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
Cost 
- 446,169 
7,866 - 446,170 
723.243 
725.502 
210.000 
254.668 
308.000 
306.574 
836.813 
836.813 
528,303 514.218 420.557 2.256.321 
526.725 515.780 415.735 2.251.465 
47,000 200.000 250,000 
47,045 281.768 212,217 
753.644 
880.861 
283,694 250,000 270,000 8.584.018 
282,038 250.919 270.570 8.582.158 
- - - 13.534.967 
- - - 13,534.967 
1.696.041 153.365 181.006 12.891.706 
1,696.413 153.993 177.819 12.665.542 
850.498 
850.498 
1.271.274 
1.218.254 
1.201.589 1.155.605 380.112 19.460.139 
1.256.600 741.148 379.207 19.042.996 
- 218.796 
- 218.796 
- . 
- 351,441 
- 351,440 
140,830 
21.630 
21.630 
584.222 
583.394 
500 
500 
8.500 
8.500 
9,100 
9,100 
146,415 163,009 
367.911 
367.910 
450.254 
5-14

TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
Total Cost 
Section Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94� FY 95 To 30 Sep 1995 
In Text 
19. Virginia Beach, VA 
(Hurrican Protection) 
20. Virginia Beach. VA 
(Reimbursement) 
21. James R. Olin Flood 
Control Project. VA 
(Regular Funds) 
22. Gathright Dam and 
Lake Moomaw. VA 
(Regular Funds) 
23. Richmond. VA 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
24 Richmond Filtration Plant 
Flood Protection 
Richmond. VA 
(Contributed Funds) 
25. Emergency Flood 
Control Activities 
26. Surveys 
27 Collection and 
Study of Basic Data 
1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Cost 
Cost 
Cost 
900,000 
716,366 
1,831.000 
1.244.937 
1.357.721 
1.362,875 
26,813,000 
27,533.293 
5,515.000 
6.105,961 
850,000 1,990.000 1,505,208 13,093.403 
983.318 877,403 1.451.624 11.840.463 
- 732.000 433,000., 1.165.000 
- 513.595 653.823 1.167.418 
300.000 3.500.000 1.656.000 9.456.644 
214.006 874.245 4.034.559 8.276.208 
74.400 1.212.897 1.261.256 
74.400 1.214.6601 1.165.324 
15.742.000 
14.810.626 
1,816.000 
192,607 
1 1.172.000 1,450,000 
10.658.497 2.999.594 
0 975,000 
1.327.104 1.751,154 
80.970.527 
80.970.527 
6.333.711 
6.287.934 
105.406.000 
105.131.806 
16.810.326 
16.467.557 
950,000 1.000.000 2.000,000 4.428.224 
318,112 498,252 2.240.817 1.535,405 
11.000 500.000 
11.000 - 
407,392 
492,259 
150.078 
511,000 
11,000 
481,152 439,929 484,876 
609,714 328,022 690,359 
197,956 186,396 198,437 
Includes $292.096 for previous projects. 
Includes $52.804 for previous projects. 
Includes $763.000 for previous projects. 
Excludes previous projects. See Annual Report for FY 1986. 
5-15

NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 
Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1995 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 03, 1871 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Mar. 03, 1909 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Mar. 02. 1945 
Mar. 03. 1899 
Jul. 25, 1912 
Jul. 25. 1912 
Mar. 03. 1925 
Jul. 03, 1930 
Jun. 26. 1934 
Mar. 02, 1945 
Mar. 02, 1945 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Aug. 08, 1917 
Jan. 21,1927 
Oct. 27,1965 
Oct. 17,1986 
Jul. 14, 1960 
May 17, 1950 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Mar. 02, 1945 
APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA (See Section 1 of Text) 
Channel 12 feet deep at mean high water and 60 feet wide. 
Diversion channel and work incidental thereto. 
Increasing channel to width of 80 feet and maintenance of 
diversion works. 
Channel 80 feet wide and 1 0 feet deep at mean low water 
between mouth and Petersburg. 
Existing project dimensions. 
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN 
NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL 
(NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 2 of Text) 
Existing project dimensions and original route, waterway 
from Norfolk, VA to sounds of North Carolina 
Original route to Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section 
Purchase of Albemarle & Chesapeake Co. Canal 
Purchase of Lake Drummond Canal (Dismal Swamp Canal) 
Construct a tidal lock at Great Bridge at a cost not to exceed 
$500,000 
Operating and care of works of improvement provided for with 
funds from War Department-appropriations for rivers and 
harbors 
Construct dikes for protection of canal property against 
flood tides 
BROAD CREEK, VA (See Section 3 of Text) 
Channel 7 feet deep. I 00 feet wide 
CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA. (See Section 4 of Text) 
Channel 35 feet deep. 400 feet wide 
Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide 
Channel 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide 
Channel 40- feet deep, 800 feet wide, two deep-draft anchorage 
Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet 
CHINCUTEAGUE INLET, VA (See Section 5 of Text) 
Existing Project 
(Sec. 107) 
HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND 
NEWPORT NEWS, VA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL 
OF DRIFT (See Section 6 of Text) 
Collection and removal of floating debris in Hampton Roads 
and specified in Act its tributary waters 
Removal of Trigg cofferdam 
Turning basin at Richmond Harbor 
Annual Report 1874, pt. Ii p. 54 
H. Doc. 139, 56 Cong. 2nd sess. 
and Annual Report 1901, p. 1467 
H. Doc. 952. 60th Cong. 1st sess 
H. Doc. 215, 69th Cong. 1st sess. 
H. Doc223, 76th Cong. Ist sess. 1/ 
H. Doc. 317. 54th Cong. 1st sess. 
AR 1896 
H. Doc. 391. 62nd Cong. 2nd sess. 
II. Doc. 589. 62nd Cong. 2nd sess. 
Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 
67th Cong.. 2nd sess. 
S. Doc. 23, 61st Cong.. 1st sess. 
Not available 
H. Doc 117. 76th Cong.. 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 117. 76th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 550. 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 486. 67th Cong.. 4th sess. 
H. Doc. 143. 89th Cong.. 2nd sess 
Approved in 1972 
Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc 68 
74th Cong., 1st sess . 1/ 
H. Doc. 738, 77th Cong., 2nd sess 
5-16 
TABLE 5-B

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1995 
TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Woik Authtodzed 
Maintaining turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal 
Channel depth increased to 35 feet to Richmond Deepwater 
Terminal 
LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA (See Section 8 of Test) 
Existing project. 
Long Creek, Lynnhaven Inlet modification 
(Sec. 107) 
NANSEMOND RIV'ER, VA. (See Section 9 of Text) 
Channel 12 feet deep, 400 to 200 feet wide. Town Point 
to mouth of Western Branch: thence, 12 feet deep. 100 
feet wide to Suffolk: turning basin 200 feet square at 
Suffolk: and spur dikes and training walls at mouth of 
Western Branch 
Existing project dimensions 
H. Doc. 191, 81st Cong., Ist sess. 
H. Doc. 586. 87th Cong., 2nd sess 
H. Doc. 580, .87th Cong., 2nd sess. 
Approved in 1982 
Annual report for 1887, p. 1001. 
H. Doc. 1 84, 70th Co ng., I st sess. 
NORFOLK HARBOR CHANNEL. 'VA 
(See Section 10 of Text) 
HAMPTON ROADS AND EI.IZABETII RIVER 
Channel 30 feet deep to Navy Yard 
Depth of 35 feet to Navy Yard 
Depth of 40 feet and width of 750 feet to mouth of Southern 
Branch 
Widen 40-foot channel to 1.500 feet from 40-foot contour in 
Hampton Roads to a point just south of Norfolk 
International Terminal 
45 feet deep Ft. Wool to Lambert Point. 800 feet wide Norfolk 
International Terminal to Lambert Point 
Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet deep 
SOUTHERN B RAN CII 
Channel with a depth of 22 and 25 feet 
Depth of 40 feet and width of 450 feet from mouth to Belt Line 
RR Bridge 
Channel 30 feet deep and 375 feet wide to Virginia RR bridge: 
thence 25 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide to Norfolk & 
Western RR bridge 
Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western 
RR bridge to a point 2.500 feet above with a turning basin 500 
feet square 
Approach and turning area 40 feet deep and a maximum width 
of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard: thence a channel 
35 feet deep and 375 and 250 feet wide to a point 1900 feet 
above Norfolk & Western RR bridge and a turning basin 35 
feet deep and 600 feet at upstream end 
45 feet deep Belt Line bridge to Old Virginia bridge. 35-foot 
deep turning basin opposite St. Jullans Creek 
11. Doc. 381. 59th Cong.. I st ses 
11. Doc 551. 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 
11. Doc 140. 65th Cong., 1st sess 
S. Doc. 122. 83rd Cong.. 2nd sess. 
11. Doc. 187. 89th Cong.. I st sess 
H. Doc. 101 3. 99th Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 551, 61 st Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 140. 65th Cong., I st sess. 
H. Doc. 226. 68th Cong., I1sts ess. 
H. Doc. 182. 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 545. 80th Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 187. 89th Cong., 1 st sess. 
5-17 
Acts Documents 
May 17. 1950 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Oct. 23. 1962 
Jul. 14. 1960 
Aug. 11. 1888 
Jul 03. 1930 
Mar. 0?. 1907 
Jun 25. 1910 
Aug. 08.1917 
Sep. 03, 1954 
Oct 27. 1965 
Oct 17. 1986 
Jun. 25. 1910 
Aug 08, 1917 
Mar 30. 1925 
Aug 30. 1935 
Jun 30. 1948 
Oct 27. 1965 
.. . .. . .. . w. . .. . .. . .. . .. r .. .r-" w. r rr r .. ~ ." .r-. .r . r. . .. r .. r r~ . .. . .. r~ r ~ . r r. . rr r wr ~ .. r .. . r . .r . .. . .. " .. . .. . .. . .: . .w . .. . .. . 
.. .. .. ... . .. r. .. .. ." w. .. .. . .w .. ". .w ". ". ." ." ." .w "w ww . w. w" w. ." .wwr"" .w .w ". w. ". . ." .. .w .w .w .. ". .. ". .wwr.. . w" .. .. ". .. ". .. ." .. .. .. ". .

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1995 
TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Extend existing 35-foot project to a channel 35 feet deep and H. Doc. 355, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. 
250 feet wide upstream 1.5 miles to the Norfolk and 
Portsmouth Belt Line RR bridge and a turning basin at the 
mouth of Mains Creek 35 feet deep and 800 feet square 
Oct. 17, 1986 Deepen existing 40-feet of portions to 45-feet deep H. Doc. 101 3, 99th Cong., 2nd ses. 
Deepen portion of the 35-foot, from mile point 15 
to Gilmerton Bridge, to 40 feet deep 
EASTERN BRANCH 
Width of 500 feet and depth of 25 and 22 feet 
Removal of shoals at mouth 
Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western 
RR bridge to Virginia RR bridge 
30-foot channel to a point opposite terminal of Imperial 
Tobacco Co. in Berkley 
Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from Norfolk & Western 
RR bridge to Campostella bridge 
WESTERN BRANCH 
Channel 24 feet deep and 300 & 400 feet wide to W\Vest 
Norfolk highway bridge 
For 18-foot channel to a point about 3.000 feet above West 
Norfolk highway bridge 
SCOTTS CREEK 
Channel 12 feet deep and I 00 feet wide to a point I 00 feet above 
the Atlantic Coast Line RR bridge. 
AN CIIORAGES 
30-foot anchorage at Lambert Point 
12-foot anchorage at Pinner Point 
An anchorage 38 feet deep and 1.500 feet square: anchorage 
35 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: and an anchorage 20 
feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long 
Two anchorages opposite Seweils Point 45 feet deep with 
1,200-foot swinging radius 
Construct a 55-foot anchorage and increase the radius 
to 1500 feet for an existing 45-foot anchorage 
PAGAN RIVER, VA (See Section 1 1 of Text) 
Channel widening at Sends 
Present project dimensions 
Mar. 02, 1907 
Mar. 03, 1925 
Jul. 03. 1930 
Mar. 02. 1945 
Mar. 04. 1913 
Jul. 03. 1930 
Jul. 03, 1930 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Aug. 08, 1917 
Sep. 3.1954 
Oct. 27; 1965 
Oct. 17. 1986 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Mar. 02, 1919 
Jul. 14, 1960 
5-18 
Oct. 22, 1976 
H. Doc 373. 59th Cong., I st sess 
Specified in act. 
H11D. oc. 226. 68th Cong.. I st sess 
H. Doc 37. 71 st Cong.. I st sess 
11. Doc 224. 76th Cong., 1 st sess 
H. Doc 556, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess 
H. Doc. 265, 70th Cong.. 1 st sess 
H1. Doc. 189. 70th Cong.. 1st sess 
H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess 
H. Doc. 605, 63rd Cong.. 2nd sess 
S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess 
H. Doc. 397. 60th Cong.. 1st Sess 
H1. Doc. 1013. 99th Cong.. 2nd secs. 
H. Doc. 397, 60th Cong., 1st sess 
H. Doc. 591. 64th Cong., 1st sess 
RUDEE INLET, VA (See Section 12 of Text) 
Project Authorized (Sec.107) 
Existing Project Approved in 1986

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1995 
TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
ANCHORAGES 
Aug. 08, 1917 
Sep. 03, 1954 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Jun. 25. 1910 
Mar. 02. 1945 
Sep. 03. 1954 
Oct 23. 1962 
Mar. 07. 1974 
Oct. 17. 1986 
Nov. 28. 1990 
Oct. 05. 1992 
THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 14 of Text) 
A channel 40 feet deep and 750 feet wide. 
Channel width increased to 1,000 feet with side channel on 
either side 32 feet deep and 450 feet wide. 
Channel 45 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. 
WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA 
(See Section 15 of Text) 
Existing project adopted 
Project modified 
WILLOUGHBY CHANNEL, VA (See Section 17 of Text) 
Project authorized 
VIRGINIA BEACH. V'A (Hurricane Protection) 
(See Section 19 of Text) 
Project authorized 
Project modified 
Project modification authorized for Phase I Advanced 
Engineering and Design 
Project Modified 
Participation after Feb 6.1987 
Cost Sharing 
V'IRGLN IA BEACH. V'A. (Reimbursement) 
(See Section 20 of Text) 
Project authorized 
JAMES R. OLLN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT. VA 
(See Section 21 of Text) 
(Fonrmerly BUENA VISTA. VA) 
Project authorized 
Name of Project Changed 
GATHRIGIIT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA 
(See Section 22 of Text) 
Project authorized 
RICIIMOND LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION. VA 
(see Section 23 of Text) 
Existing project 
WHITINGS CREEK (See Section 16 of Text) 
Existing Project 
Nov. 28. 1990 
Oct. 05. 1992 
Jul. 24. 1946 
Aug. 15, 1985 
Mar 02, 1945 
H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. 
S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong.. 1st sess. 
H. Doc 957. 60th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 268, 76th Cong., 1st sess 
H. Doc 507. 70th Cong.. 2nd sess 
H. Doc. 186. 83rd. Cong. 1st sess 
H. Doc 382. 87th Cong. 2nd sess 
11. Doc. 365. 92nd Cong. 2nd sess 
11. Doe. 216. 89th Cong.. 2nd sess 
Chief of Engrs Report dated 
July 27,1990 
H. Doc. 325, 61st Cong., 2nd ses. 
H. Doc. 178, 98th Cong., 2nd ess 
H. Doc. 582. 76th Cong.. 3rd sess 
5-19

NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 
TABLE 5-C ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN 
NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA: 
DATA RELATIVE TO THE COMPLETED LOCKS 
(See Section 2 of Text) 
Dimensions 
Greatest 
Length Depth on 
Miles Width Available Miter Sills Year 
From of forFull Character Opened Construction 
Norfolk, Location Chamber Width Lift Upper Lower of to Cost 
VA feet (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Navigation 
12.4 Albemarle and 75 600 2.7 1 1 Piles in sand 1932 $499.913 
Chesapeake Canal and shells 
(Great Bridge, VA) 
10.7 Dismal Swamp 52 300 12 12 12 Natural earth 1940 S348.879 
Canal (Deep Creek) with cutoff 
walls 
33.1 Dismal Swamp 52 300 12 12 1 3 Natural earth 1941 S373.226 
Canal with cutoff walls 
(South Mills. NC) 
I 1 6 feet at mean low water. 
5-20

NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 
Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1995 
TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1995 Additional Expenditure 
Project Report, See For New Work 
Annual Report Expended From 
For 1992 Construction Maintenance 'Contributed Funds 
Aberdeen Creek. VA 2/ 1975 109,643 221,827- 
Appomattox River, VA 1/ 1992 870,341 4,794,436 
Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA 1991 608,255- 
Bennett Creek, VA 1992 442,602 - 104.621 
Slackwater River, VA 
Active portion 2/10/ 1975 342,118 185,577 19.300 
Broad Creek. VA 2/ 1986 27,888 697,108 500 
Cape Charles, VA 1989 622,644 2,511,748- 
Carters Creek. VA 
Active portion 2/ 3/ 1951 28.398 29,127 
Channel to Newport News, VA 1992 4.097.117 7.145.456 4.965.108 
Channel from Phoebus. VA 
to deepwater in Hampton Roads 2' 1944 11.500 64.919 1.200 
Channel connecting York River. VA 
Back Creek to Sleights Wharf 2' 1950 14.855 38.634 2.500 
Chesconessex Creek. VA 2' 1968 25.516 43,775- 
Chincoteague Bay. VA 1984 25.126 513,005 
Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge. VA 1985 49.396 242.237 
Chowan River, NC 2/ 1975 107.220 14,416 5.700 
Cockrelis Creek. VA 4/ 1949 - - 
Cranes Creek. VA 1992 6.274 685.124- 
Davis Creek. VA 2/ 1971 97.612 213.105 4.000 
Deep Creek. Accomack Co.. VA 1974 83.000 197.259- 
Deep Creek. Newport News. VA 2/ 1991 288.278 3.318.501- 
Dymers Creek. VA 2/ 1953 5,582 7.658- 
Finney Creek at Wachapreague. VA 1988 68,656 6.278 7.763 
Greenvale Creek. VA 2/ 1991 20,003 775.614 
Hampton Creek. VA 1989 186,237 1.270,204 62.969 
Hom Harbor. VA 2/ 1990 13,987 351.590 
Hoskins Creek. VA 2/ 1990 44,100 1.881,736 500 
Jackson Creek . VA 2/ 1971 8.500 50.844 
Jarvis Creek. VA 4/ 1979 39.259- 
Kings Creek. VA 4/ 1957 5,593 - - 
Lafayette River. VA 2/ 1982 242,047 371,384 188.962 
Lttle Machiponoo River. VA 1990 0 0 1.211 
L.ttle River (Creek). VA 2/ 12/ 1966 168.623 566,521 
Locklies (Creek .VA 2/ 1928 11,581 68.506 
Lynnhaven Inlet, VA 1991 459,612 3.018,333 
Mattaponi River. VA 1971 83,836 215,927 
Meherrin River. VA 1987 47,734 54,764 
Miliford Haven. VA 2/ 1950 24,568 33,688 
Mill Creek, VA 2/ 1937 5,445 21,536 
Mulberry (reek, 2/ 1950 2,393 2,458 
Nandua ('reek 2/ 1950 6,988 138,700 
Nansemond River. VA 6/ 1978 167,477 508,401 
Newport News Creek, VA 2/ 1992 261,697 449,516 
Nottoway River, VA 2/ 1986 44.295 8.734 43.000 
5-21

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1995 
TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30. 1995 Additional Expenditure 
Project Report. See For New Work 
Annual Report Expended From 
For. 1992 Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds 
Occohannock Creek. VA 
Active portion 2/ 1951 13,859 92.044 
Onancock River, VA 2/ 5/ 1963 187,914 525.952 
Oyster Channel, VA 2/ 1991 119,117 788.122 
Pagan River, VA 2/ 6/ 1950 51.425 825.104 
Pamunkey River, VA 
Active portion 2/ 1964 31.376 161.183 
Parker Creek, VA 1991 15.530 583.325 
Parrotts Creek, VA 2/ 1957 37.045 69.132 
Portsmouth Harbor, VA Channel to 
Nansemond Ordnance Depot 2/ 1947 165,566 66.162 
Oueens Creek 2/ 1991 26,949 442.606 
Quinby Creek. VA 1991 104,176 1.788,503 
Rappahannock River, VA 8/ 9/ 11/ 1983 414,633 1.969.242 
Rappahannock River at 
Bowlers Wharf. VA 4/ 1950 
Starlings Creek, VA 1991 66,242 1.143.236 
Tangier Channels. VA 1992 146.138 3 506.001 
Taskinas Creek. VA 1975 7,479 135 
Thimble Shoal Channel. VA 13/ 1991 17.934.772 14.967.074 3.459.868 
Totuskey Creek. VA 1970 167,869 451.293 2,000 
Tylers Beach Harbor. VA 2/ 1982 311.201 804,713 
Urbanna Creek. VA 2/ 7/ 1963 55.724 116.433 
Whitings Creek. VA 1990 21,630 431.506 500 
Winter Harbor 2/ 1981 171.334 340.837 2.973 
Willoughby Channel. VA 2/ 1953 8.500 128.188 
Wishart Point Channel, VA 2/ 1975 118,762 151,892 30.625 
York River, VA 
Active portion 1986 265.694 361.616 
1/ Includes $22,500 for previous projects. 
2/ Completed. 
3/ Inaddition, S700 for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. 
4/ Inactive. 
5/ Includes $33.549 for new work and $24,754 for maintenance for previous projects. 
6/ Includes S20,671 for new work for previous projects. 
7/ In addition. $61,087 was expended for rehabilitation. 
8/In addition, $168,091 was expended for rehabilitation. 
9/ Includes $197,146 for previous new work projects. 
10/ Includes $15,000 for new work for previous projects. 
11/ Includes $1 13,500 for previousmaintenance projects. 
12/ Federal funds expended by the U.S. Navy for new work. 
13/ In addition, $143,00o for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. 
5-22

NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 
Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1995 
TABLE 5-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1995 Additional Expenditure 
Project Report, See For Now Work 
Annual Report Expended From 
For Construction Maintence Contributed Funds 
Anderson Park, Newport News, VA 1979 471,474 1,254 176.671 
Hampton Institute, VA 1976 156,906 1,589 175,845 
Rapidan River, Orange, VA 1984 45,000 - 
Saxis Island, VA 1987 273,600 3.145 
Tangier Island Shore Protection, VA 1990 2.481,815 2,008 1,379,371 
TABLE 5-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30,1995 Additional Expenditure 
Project Report, See For New Work 
Annual Report Expended From 
For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds 
Newmarket Creek. VA 1970 1,000.000 47,562 550,097 
Norfolk Floodwall. VA 1973 1.851.933 51.827 516.256 
Scottsville, VA 1989 3,431,746 19.010 32.954 
Virginia Beach Canal No. 2. VA 1990 4.708,587 54,380 216.596 
5-23

NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 
TABLE 5-G 
Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS 
PROJECT NAME MONTH/YEAR TYPE OF SURVEY 
Aberdeen Creek 
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway: 
Deep Creek 
Dismal Swamp Canal 
Atlantic Ocean Channel 
Baltimore Harbor and Channels: 
Rappahannock Shoal Channel 
Bennetts Creek 
Blackwater River 
Channel Connecting York River to Back Creek at Slaights Wharf 
Channel to Newport News 
Chincoteague Bay Channel 
Chincoteague Inlet and Inner Channel 
Davis Creek 
Deep Creek Accomack County 
Elizabeth River: 
Scotts Creek 
Southern Branch 40 Foot Channel 
Southern Branch 35 Foot Channel 
Western Branch Channel 
Hloskins Creek 
James River: 
City Point Shoal 
Goose Hill Channel 
Richmond Deepwater Terminal to Hopewell 
Rocklanding Shoal Channel 
Lynnhaven Inlet, Bay and Connecting Waters: 
Inlet, Bay and Long Cree 
The Narrows 
Aug 95 
Jun 95 
Jan 95 
Dec 94 
Sep 95 
Sep 95 
Jun 95 
Jul 95 
Jun 95 
Jun 95 
Jun 95 
Aug 95 
Aug 95 
Jun 95 
Apr 95 
Feb 95 
Feb 95 
Sep 95 
Mar 95 
Jul 95 
Nov 94 
Mar 95 
Aug 95 
Aug 95 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Reconnaissance 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
5-24

TABLE 5-G 
Report of the Secretary of the Army on Ciyil Works Activities for FY 1995 
RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS 
PROJECT NAME MONTH/YEAR TYPE OF SURVEY 
Norfolk Harbor: 
40 foot Channel 
Oyster Channel 
Pagan River 
Rappahannock River: 
Mangoright Bar 
Thimble Shoal Channel 
Tylers Beach Channel 
Waterway on the Coast of VA: 
Burtons Bay 
Cedar Island Bay 
Lewis Creek 
Magothy Bay 
Swash Bay 
White Trout Creek 
Apr 95 
Jul 95 
Dec 94 
'.ug 95 
Jul 95 
Jul 95 
Jan 95 
Jul 95 
Jun 95 
Jan 95 
Sep 95 
Sep 95 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
Condition 
5-25

WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT *
This district comprises central and eastern North 
Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, 
embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic 
Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the 
Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin 
River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River 
Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and 
Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its 
tributaries for navigation only. Also included are those 
portions of theYadkin-Pee-Dee and Catawba River basins 
within the state of N. C. as well as a portion of the Atlantic 
Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of 
North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the 
waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North 
Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. Aquatic Plant Control ...................................... 6-2 
(R & H Act of 1965) 
2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 
Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns 
River, Fla, (Wilmington District) ................ :..... 6-2 
3. Cape Fear River, N.C. 
Above W ilm ington ...................... .. ................ 6-4 
4. Drum Inlet, N.C ................. .................. 6-4 
5. Lockwoods Folly River, N.C .............................. 6-4 
6. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C ....................... 6-5 
7. Morehead City Harbor, N.C ............................ 6-6 
8. Rollinson Channel, N.C .................................... 6-7 
9. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C.................................. 6-7 
10. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound 
and Beaufort Harbor, N.C.................................6-7 
11. Wilmington Harbor, N.C ................................. 6-8 
Beach Erosion Control 
12. Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N.C. .................. 6-9 
Flood Control 
13. Cape Fear River Basin, N.C ........................... 6-9 
13-A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N.C ............ 6-9 
14. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C ................. 6-10 
15. Danville (Southside Wastewater 
Treatment Plant), Va ...................................... 6-10 
16. Hamlet City Lake, N.C ................................. 6-11 
17. King (Water Plant), N.C ............................... 6-11 
18. Lower Creek, Lenoir, N.C ............................. 6-12 
19. N.C. Aquarium, Dare County, N.C .................. 6-12 
20. Neuse River Basin, N.C .................................. 6-12 
20-A. Falls Lake, N.C................................................6-12 
21. Oriental (South Avenue), N.C ...................... 6-13 
22 Roanoke River Upper Basin, 
Va.-Headwaters Area...................................... 6-14 
23. Thomasville (Walnut Street), N.C .................. 6-14 
24. Wrightsville Beach, N.C ................................ 6-14 
25. Yadkin River Basin, N.C. and S.C .................. 6-15 
Page 
25-A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and 
Reservoir, N.C .................. .................... 6-15 
26. Inspection of Completed 
Flood Control Projects .................................... 6-15 
27. Flood Control Work Under 
Special Authorization .................................... 6-15 
Multiple-Purpose Projects, 
Including Power 
28. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C ............... 6-16 
28-A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, 
Va. and N .C ....................................... 6-16 
28-B. Philpott Lake, Va ....................... .................. 6-16 
29. Scheduling Flood Control 
Reservoir Operations .................................... 6-16 
General Investigations 
30. Surveys .............................. ......... 6-18 
31. Collection and Study of Basic Data .............. 6-18 
32. Preconstruction Engineering 
and D esign ......................................... 6-18 
Tables 
Table 6-A Cost and Financial Statement ............ 6-19 
Table 6-B Authorizing Legislation ...................... 6-24 
Table 6-C Other Authorized 
Navigation Projects ............................ 6-27 
Table 6-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion 
Control Projects .................................. 6-28 
Table 6-E Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects ......................... .................... 6-29 
Table 6-F Not Applicable 
Table 6-G Deauthorized Projects ........................ 6-30 
Table 6-H Reconnaissance and 
Condition Surveys .............................. 6-31 
Table 6-I Navigation Work Under 
Special Authorization.......................... 6-31 
Table 6-J Dams and Reservoirs .......................... 6-32 
Table 6-K Flood Control Work Under 
Special Authorization .......................... 6-33 
6-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Navigation 
1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER 
AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) 
Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, 
connecting channels, and other allied waters in 
Wilmington District. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for 
control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, 
alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other 
obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, 
tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied 
waters of the United States, in the combined interest of 
navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and 
wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, 
including continued research for development of the most 
effective and economic control measures in cooperation 
with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with 
the report of the Chief of Engineers, House Document 
251,89th Congress, 1st session. The project was authorized 
by Section 302, 1965 River and HarborAct (H.D. 25, 89th 
Congr., 1st sess.). The Act provides that research and 
planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold 
the United States free from damages that may occur from 
operations performed in connection with this project, and 
participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the 
program. Recon studies are 100 percent Federal. 
Requirements are being met. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Operations for FY 95 included chemical control on 
about 83 river miles of alligator weed (about 28 treatment 
acres) and 3 acres of hydrilla, biological control of hydrilla 
at 5 lakes (125 acres of hydrilla), and monitoring of 
biological control of hydrilla at 12 sites stocked with 
triploid grass carp in previous years. 
All alligator weed control in FY 95 was by the application 
of rodeo herbicide. All treatment sites are under 
maintenance control. Control areas include the 
Scuppernong River Basin, Little River Basin, Pasquotank 
River Basin, Alligator River Basin and Lumber River 
Basin. No new alligatorweed treatment areas were added 
to the program in FY 95. Five hydrilla biological control 
sites, Holt and Reedy Creek Reserviors, Big Lake, Lake 
Wheeler and Lake Rogers were restocked with triploid 
grass carp and hydrilla, and Lake Crabtree was treated 
with aquatic herbicide in FY 95. 
Monitoring of hydrilla control sites previously stocked 
with triploid grass carp to determine the effectiveness of 
the stocking and predict future control needs continued 
in FY 95. 
Program activities also included investigations of aquatic 
weed problems, in response to requests by the State of 
North Carolina, which may result in the addition of new 
treatment sites and species in future years. 
The Aquatic Plant Control Program activities were 
accomplished at a Federal cost of $41,679. State and local 
governments implemented an ongoing chemical hydrilla 
control plan at Lake Gaston in 1991. Federal involvement 
in the implementation of a program to control nuisance 
vegetation in Lake Gaston, Virginia and North Carolina, 
was authorized by Section 339 of Public Law 102-580. 
Funding was provided via the Conference Report for the 
Energy and Water DevelopmentAppropriationAct,1994. 
Funds in the amount of $172,000 were received in 1994 
and $28,000 in 1995. Aquatic weed herbicide treatments 
of approximately 187 acres at Lake Gaston were 
accomplished at a Federal cost of $47,412. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. All alligatorweed 
treatment sites under maintenance control in FY 95 are 
expected to remain under maintenance control. A 
biennial treatment schedule in some maintenance level 
alligatorweed control sites implemented in FY 93 will 
continue in FY 96. 
Monitoring of hydrilla control sites previously stocked 
with triploid grass carp indicates that overall our 
biological control efforts have been effective. 
Supplemental stocking has been required to achieve 
control in some sites. Restocking on at least a once every 
5-year basis is expected to be required to maintain weed 
control in these sites. 
2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY 
BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS 
RIVER, FLA. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) 
Location. The project is located on the east coast of 
the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns 
River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District 
begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and 
extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to 
Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast 
and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) 
Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports 
for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 
feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the 
construction, operation and maintenance of suitable 
bridges; saltwater intrusion preventive measures in the 
vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 
feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal 
Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in 
Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet 
long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the 
Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet, then 
8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar; a 
channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 
200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 
6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a 
connecting channel of the same dimensions to the 
Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a 
channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, 
between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard 
Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel 
through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide 
and a channel from NewTopsail Inlet to the Intracoastal 
Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 
80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in 
Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the 
barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a 
channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean 
6-2

WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT 
bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the 
entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the 
channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville 
Beach by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning 
basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on 
the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, 
with three 15-pile dolphins therein; a channel, 8 feet deep 
and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar at Carolina Beach 
Inlet to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 6 
feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and 
including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide 
and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 
feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of 
Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable 
channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the 
general navigation features of the North Carolina State 
Ports Authority Small-Boat Harbor at Southport, 
consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 
feet long, an eastern harbor-access channel, 70 feet wide 
and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 
feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet 
wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. A 
modification providing for the replacement of five 
Federally owned and operated highway bridges was 
authorized in December 1970. A modification providing 
for 100 percent Federal funding for Walter B. Jones 
(formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Joseph P. Knapp 
(formerly Coinjock) bridges was authorized in October 
1976. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal 
funding at Core Creek, Hobucken, and Fairfield Bridges 
was authorized in November 1986. Estimated Federal 
cost is $75,644,000 (1995). The tidal lock at Snow's Cut 
was deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority 
of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. The 12-foot-deep channel in Peltier 
Creek was deauthorized by the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986. The 12-foot deep channel 
modification to New River was deauthorized January 1, 
1990, under Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. The jetties at 
Masonboro Inlet are complete except for the training wall. 
The training wall has an estimated Federal cost of 
$3,470,000 (1992). The wall was reclassified to the 
"inactive" category on August 14,1992. A Section 111 
project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty 
was authorized in October 1980 and was completed in 
April 1981. Length of channels and basins total 347.7 
miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. 
In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in 
water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or 
below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear 
River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets 
to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 
feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just 
inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 
3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes 
and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape 
Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range 
varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at 
the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway 
between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane 
Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 
17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except 
for the uncompleted modifications. The State of North 
Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon 
completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, 
replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. 
They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent 
of the first cost. The Water Resources Acts of 1976 and 
1986 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete 
the non-Federal cost-sharing requirement for all five 
bridges. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Core Creek Bridge was completed at a cost of 
$49,721. Design of Hobucken Bridge was completed and 
construction started at a cost of $2,815,395. Plans and 
specifications were started for Fairfield Bridge at a cost 
of $386,335. Work in connection with the completion of 
Joseph P. Knapp Bridge cost $3,955. Maintenance: 
Through Channel - During intermittent periods the 
U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging 
operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring 
facilities at a cost of $141,924. Between November 11, 
1994, and January 22, 1995 and March 26 and 28, 1995, 
the contract dredge Enterprise dredged 442,719 cubic 
yards from shoals from Norfolk, VA, to SC State Line at a 
cost of $1,680,174. Engineering and design in connection 
with future year maintenance dredging from Norfolk, VA, 
to SC State Line cost $201,014. Engineering and design 
in connection with future year pipeline dredging in the 
Neuse River cost $37,816. Work in connection with prior 
year pipeline dredging cost $60,905. Mosquito control in 
disposal areas cost $123,288. Archeological investigations 
of sounds and inlets cost $11. Condition and operation 
studies cost $530,564. Interim inspection of the two 
remaining bridges cost $8,993. Long-term environmental 
dredging and monitoring study cost $122,272. Master 
Plan supplement for Snow's Cut cost $11. Two highway 
bridges and utilities were operated and maintained at a 
cost of $444,686. Impacts of beach disposal/nourishment 
on beaches study cost $28,828. Update Colonial Nesting 
Waterbirds data base inventory cost $5,886. Exploratory 
drilling of nine disposal sites along the AIWW cost 
$25,617. Investigation of encroachments, leases and 
signage at Snows Cut cost $20. Seabeach Ameranth, 
Piping Plover and SeaTurtles studies cost $26,484. Initial 
appraisal for Section 204 cost $1,230. Bogue Inlet - 
During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge 
Fry removed 62,720 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue 
Inlet at a cost of $154,428. During intermittent periods 
the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 82,066 cubic 
yards from shoals in Bogue inlet at a cost of $251,814. 
Condition and operation studies cost $10,301. Carolina 
Beach Inlet - Adjustments in cost for prior year work 
resulted in a reduction in cost for the debris boat Snell of 
$74. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting 
dredge Merritt removed 31,913 cubic yards from shoals 
in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $306,000. During 
intermittent periods the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck 
removed 86,475 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach 
Inlet at a cost of $428,155. During intermittent periods 
the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 56,700 cubic 
yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of 
$252,358. Monitoring of Carolina Beach Inlet cost 
$12,030. Condition and operation studies cost $37,759. 
6-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Masonboro Inlet -Condition and operation studies cost 
$9,804. Rehabilitation report and plans and specifications 
for the north jetty at Masonboro Inlet cost $64,822. 
Monitoring at Masonboro Inlet cost $7,502. 
Investigations to determine navigational servitude cost 
$40,428. Work in conjunction with prior year 
renourishment of Masonboro Island cost $3,650 New 
River Inlet - During intermittent periods the U.S. 
sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 194,596 cubic yards 
from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $592,189. 
During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge 
Fry removed 42,370 cubic yards from shoals in New River 
Inlet at a cost of $82,800. Condition and operation studies 
cost $36,515. New Topsail Inlet - Between February 
21 and March 8, 1995, the contract dredge Richmond 
removed 38,833 cubic yards from shoals in Topsail Inlet 
at a cost of $174,751. During intermittent periods the 
U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 70,245 cubic 
yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of 
$238,000. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris 
boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations 
and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities 
at a cost of $28,114. Condition and operation studies 
cost $18,657. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 
completed in November 1986 except for three tie-up 
dolphins at Masonboro Inlet and the three remaining 
bridges. The construction contract for Core Creek Bridge 
was awarded September 27, 1991, and completed March 
1994. Core Creek Bridge was opened to traffic in October 
1993. The construction contract for Hobucken Bridge was 
awarded April 10, 1995 with completion scheduled for 
January 1998. Design of Fairfield Bridge is scheduled 
for completion inAugust 1996. The construction contract 
is scheduled to be awarded in February 1997 with 
completion scheduled for December 1999. Total cost of 
existing project to September 30, 1995, was $200,415,067, 
of which $61,294,929 was for new work including $86,851 
in contributed funds and $139,120,138 was for 
maintenance, including $667,300 in contributed funds. 
3. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE 
WILMINGTON 
Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep 
and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and 
empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the 
southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic 
Survey Chart 426.) 
Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 
1915 and 1938. 
Existing projects. The authorized project provides for 
a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington 
to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at 
Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet 
wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five 
channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to 
eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from 
mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks 
and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational 
facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project 
channels is 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by 
River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; 
August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and 
Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details 
see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront 
facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. debris 
boat Snell snagged and cleared and maintained the buoy 
systems at the locks at a cost of $329,376. Periodic 
inspections of locks and dams cost $35,273. Repairing 
and rehabilitation of recreation facitilies of the three lock 
and dams cost $8,118. Repairs to miter gates at William 
0. Huske Lock and Dam cost $9,428. Updating site plans 
and future development and landscape plan cost $2,332. 
Preparation of environmental documentation for future 
maintenance dredging cost $25,620. Condition and 
operation studies cost $44,029. operation and 
maintenance of three locks and dams cost $260,330. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 
completed in June 1970. Total costs of existing project to 
September 30, 1995, were $25,182,086 of which 
$4,324,960 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for 
new work and $20,857,126 for maintenance. 
4. DRUM INLET, N.C. 
Location. Drum Inlet is an opening through the 
barrier beach which separates Core Sound from the 
Atlantic Ocean. It is about 1,100 feet wide and is about 
35 miles northeast of Beaufort and opposite the village 
ofAtlantic. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1233 
and 419.) 
Existing project. The project provides for a channel 
12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from 
the gorge in the inlet to the Federally improved channel 
in Core Sound, about 1 mile. The mean range tide is 3.8 
feet in the ocean and 0.3 foot in Core Sound at Atlantic. 
The project also provides for a channel 150 feet wide and 
9 feet deep from the gorge in the inlet to deep water in 
the Atlantic Ocean. The Core Sound portion of the project 
was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of June 20, 
1938. (H.D. 414, 75th Cong., 2nd sess.)The channel from 
the inlet to the Atlantic Ocean was authorized under 
Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for limited 
reevaluation report cost $54,468. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 
completed in February 1972. The Limited Reevaluation 
Report was completed in September 1994. It determined 
that resumption of Federal maintenance is economically 
justified and is environmentally acceptable. The plans 
and specifications were suspended due to insufficient 
funds to complete the work. 
5. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. 
Location. The project is located on the south coast of 
North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. 
6-4

WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT 
(See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and 
Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water 
from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, 
to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and 
mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above 
the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 
1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 
4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation 
at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 
1890 River and HarborAct. (See Annual Report for 1887, 
page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 
to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the 
ocean bar for a distance of 4,700 feet was approved by 
the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 
107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. During dredging 
operations it became apparent that establishment of the 
12-foot project would not be possible with currently 
available equipment. Therefore, the Chief of Engineers, 
on December 20, 1983, approved the District's 
recommendation that further construction activity for the 
Lockwoods Folly Inlet project be suspended until suitable 
equipment becomes available and that the project be 
maintained at an 8-foot project depth in the interim. 
Local cooperation. For the new modification local 
interests must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with 
interest, one-half of the first costs of construction allocated 
to recreational boating; (b) hold and save the United 
States free from damages resulting from changes in 
ground water levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action 
due to the construction works, except damages due to 
the fault or negligence of the United States or its 
contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States 
all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the 
construction and subsequent maintenance of the project 
and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief 
of Engineers, and (d) provide depths in berthing areas 
commensurate with the project depths, and provide 
service facilities. 
Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on 
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, 
about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a 
total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons 
Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are 
five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous 
natural landings are used for loading and unloading small 
boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly 
Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered 
adequate for present commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Adjustments in cost for prior year clearing 
and snagging operations and maintaining dredging 
ranges and mooring facilities by the U.S. debris boat Snell 
resulted in a reduction in cost of $74. During intermittent 
periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 67,400 
cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly River at a 
cost of $92,328. During intermittent periods the U.S. 
hopper dredge Currituck removed 26,265 cubic yards 
from shoals in Lockwoods Folly River at a cost of $87,859. 
During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge 
Merritt removed 32,925 cubic yards from shoals in 
Lockwoods Folly River at a cost of $123,282. Archeological 
investigations in Lockwoods Folly River cost $5. 
Condition and operation studies cost $15,999. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of 
the project was completed in June 1965 except for the 
latest modification. Work was initiated on the latest 
modification on September 23, 1982, with a depth of 8 
feet being reached in October 1982. The project will be 
maintained at the 8-foot depth until suitable equipment 
for deepening to 12 feet becomes available. 
6. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. 
Location. The project is located on the northeastern 
side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and 
Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from theAtlantic 
Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot 
channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and 
Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide 
connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with 
Albemarle Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A 
newly authorized modification provides for stabilization 
of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, 
including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach; 
a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the 
ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 
120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and 
through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin 
of the same depth at Wanchese; and a channel 10 feet 
deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot-deep channel in 
Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay through Roanoke and 
Albemarle Sounds to deep water near the northern end 
of Croatan Sound. The 12-foot Croatan Sound channel 
has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. 
The estimated Federal cost for the modification is 
$82,619,000 (1995). The project was authorized by River 
and Harbor Acts of June 25,1910; October 17, 1940; May 
17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 
of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. 
Local cooperation. For the new modification, local 
interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and 
rights-of-way for construction and subsequent 
maintenance of the project, including suitable areas 
required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and 
also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and 
embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining 
works; (b) hold and save the United States free from 
damages due to the construction works and subsequent 
maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain 
adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on 
equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the 
Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary 
mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, 
open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans 
approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and 
maintain depths in berthing areas and local access 
channels serving the terminals commensurate with 
depths provided in the related project areas; (f) 
accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water 
supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, 
6-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
or other utility facilities as well as their maintenance; (g) 
establish a competent and properly constituted public 
body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free 
development of the harbor facilities, with the 
understanding that said facilities will be open to all on 
equal terms; (h) establish regulations prohibiting the 
discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other 
pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, 
which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable 
laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities 
responsible for pollution prevention and control; (i) pay 
one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to 
recreational navigation presently estimated at 
$9,430,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance 
and replacement of recreational navigation facilities 
presently estimated at $1,125,000 annually; (j) pay 10 
percent of the costs allocated to navigation during 
construction presently estimated at $9,011,000; (k) pay 
an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to 
navigation within a period of 30 years following 
completion of construction offset by a credit allowed for 
the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations 
(except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal 
areas presently estimated at $8,000,000. Reasonable 
assurances have been received. The State of N. C. has 
constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was 
reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483. 
Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 
waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. 
Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with 
the enlarged basin at Wanchese. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Reanalysis of sand bypassing study cost $199,449. 
Additional engineering and design work is being 
accomplished under preconstruction engineering and 
design. Maintenance: Between January 27 and 30 
September 1995, the contract dredge Cherokee removed 
457,862 cubic yards from shoals in old House Channel 
and Channel to Wanchese at a cost of $1,623,008. 
Between August 16 and September 30, 1995, the contract 
dredge Atchafalaya removed 250,000 cubic yards from 
shoals in Oregon Inlet and the vicinity of the bridge at a 
cost of $1,674,992. Work in connection with prior year 
dredging of the ocean bar and the vicinity of the bridge 
cost $45,447. During intermittent periods the U.S. 
sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed 577,891 cubic 
yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $948,770. 
During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge 
Fry removed 245,540 from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a 
cost of $582,837. Work in connection with prior year 
dredging in Oregon Inlet by the U.S. sidecasting dredge 
Merritt cost $6,800. During intermittent periods the U.S. 
debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging 
operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring 
facilities at a cost of $73,561. Expansion and mitigation 
of disposal island cost $407. Repair of Island H and 
construction of a new sand bag disposal area was 
accomplished at a contributed funds cost of $46,237. 
Diking work in connection with contract dredging in Old 
House Channel and Channel to Wanchese was 
accomplished at a contributed funds cost of $283,373. 
Adjustments for prior year environmental dredging 
studies and monitoring activities in connection with sea 
turtle research resulted in a reduction in cost of $700. 
Project monitoring cost $77,337. National Ocean Tidal 
Datum Determination cost $12,382. Dredged material 
management plan preliminary assessment cost $17,004. 
Condition and operation studies cost $109,456. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 
complete except for the latest modification. (For further 
detail, see Annual Report of 1962.) 
7. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. 
Location. The project is located on the northern shore 
of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast 
and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) 
Previous project. For details see page 470 of Annual 
Report for 1935. 
Existing project. A channel 47 feet deep and 450 feet 
wide from deep water in the Atlantic Ocean through the 
ocean bar at Beaufort Inlet with three wideners; a cutoff 
channel 400 feet wide; and a depth of 45 feet in the east 
leg of the basin, including a 1,350 foot diameter turning 
area; a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from the 
turning basin to Sixth Street, Morehead City, then 12 
feet deep, 200 to 400 feet wide to Tenth Street; then 6 
feet deep, 75 feet wide, to Bogue Sound. Project also 
includes assumption of maintenance in the northwest 
leg and the east leg extension. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet 
were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 
1972. The jetties were deauthorized by the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986. The project was 
authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 
84th Cong., 1st Sess.), the River and Harbor Act of 
December 31, 1970 and the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992. For further details see Annual 
Report for 1962. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities 
serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine 
terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a 
depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of 
cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements 
to facilities were completed in 1969. For further details 
see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: No cost were incurred but adjustments in final 
cost resulted in a reduction in the work allowance of 
$176,346. Return of contributed funds resulted in a 
reduction in work allowance of $155. Maintenance: 
Between February 7 and April 19, 1995, the contract 
dredge Eagle removed 815,579 cubic yards from shoals 
in the inner harbor at a cost of $1,429,616. Ocean 
dumping monitoring cost $14,356. Benthic survey in 
conjunction with maintenance dredging of the bar 
channel cost $24,397. Monitoring at Morehead City 
Harbor cost $15,825. Environmental and permitting 
activities associated with sea turtle research cost $12,027. 
Condition and operation studies cost $272,681. Return 
of contributed funds resulted in a reduction in work 
allowance of $57,518. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 
complete with the latest modification being physically 
6-6

WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT 
complete in April 1994. (For further details, see Annual 
Report of 1962.) Total cost of the project to September 
30, 1995, was $77,220,442of which $15,892,219 was for 
new work, including $2,731,996 contributed funds 
(including $553,477 public works funds) and $61,328,203 
for maintenance, including $1,747,812 contributed funds. 
8. ROLLINSON CHANNEL, N. C. 
Location. The project is located about 3.5 miles 
northeast of Hatteras Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic 
Survey Chart 1232.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 5.1 miles 
long from deep water in Pamlico Sound to and including 
a basin of the same depth, 80 to 150 feet wide, and 1,450 
feet long at Hatteras; a rubble-mound breakwater on each 
side of the channel at the entrance to the basin; and a 
channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from that depth 
in Hatteras Inlet gorge to Rollinson Channel, in the 
vicinity of the basin at Hatteras. The project was 
authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 
1935; March 2, 1945; September 3,1954; and October 23, 
1962. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 
Local cooperation. Complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. Six waterfront facilities serve the 
channel, with a total frontage of 926 feet. Existing 
facilities are adequate for present commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Engineering and design for future year 
maintenance dredging cost $26,827. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 
completed August 22, 1966. (For further details see 
Annual Report for 1961.) 
9. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. 
Location. The project is located at the southwest end 
of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the 
southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico 
Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic 
Survey Chart No. 1232. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance 
channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to 
Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 
feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot 
Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a 
channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance 
channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in 
Ocracoke Inlet, a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, 
across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls 
on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 
300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges 
are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at 
Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico 
Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 
or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have 
raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal 
water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing 
Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve 
the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Between October 19 and November 11, 
1994, the contract dredgeEnterprise dredged 44,305 cubic 
yards from shoals in Silver Lake Harbor at a cost of 
$145,135. Repairs to the south jetty cost $8,613. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 
completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual 
Report for 1961.) 
10. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO 
SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. 
Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of 
the outer banks of eastern North Carolina. (See Coast 
and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet 
wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an 
alternative route of the same dimensions through Back 
Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of 
Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide 
from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar 
Island, including the authorized passage and future 
maintenance of a channel through the existing private 
basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide 
and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 
feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide 
from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet 
deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, 
the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 5 feet deep and 75 
feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, the same depth, 
at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a 
basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at 
Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 
feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet 
by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west 
end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 
feet wide, from the existing side channel atAtlantic, N.C., 
to the mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 
50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 
feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning 
at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and 
White Point, running along the channel approximately 
2,000 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The 
length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles. 
(See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully compiled with to date for 
completed portion. 
Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the 
waterway. Additional facilities are needed along Core 
Sound. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Preparation of environmental 
docmentation for future maintenance dredging cost 
$23,430. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 
completed in September 1972. (For further details, see 
Annual Report for 1961.) 
6-7

OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
11. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. 
Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, 
on southeast coast of North Carolina, between theAtlantic 
Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and 
Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) 
Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of 
Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report 
for 1938. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from theAtlantic 
Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to 
Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the 
upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) 
at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to 
Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River; a 38-foot 
deep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-foot-deep 
turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 
12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in 
Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet 
wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River 
to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of 
the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a 
point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was 
authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; 
March 2,1945; May 17,1950; October 23,1962; and March 
10, 1964; under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor 
Act. A modification to widen the existing anchorage basin 
by 100 feet was authorized on July 13, 1982, under Sec. 5 
of the Cong. Appro. Act of March 4, 1915. A modification 
to widen the 38-foot by 400-foot Fourth East Jetty 
Channel to 500 feet; deepen the 32-foot by 400-foot 
channel between Castle Street and the N. C. 133 bridge 
to 35 feet; widen the 32-foot by 1000-foot by 800-foot 
turning basin just above the mouth of the Northeast Cape 
Fear River by 50 feet on the west side and deepen to 35 
feet; and environmental improvements to include 
acquiring, by easements or fee title, about 2,800 acres of 
wetlands, river bluffs and ecotones and provision for a 
minimum number of specially designed corridors across 
the wetlands for industrial access to the river was 
authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 
November 17, 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated Federal 
cost is $26,430,000. (For further details of authorization, 
see 1962 Annual Report.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except 
for latest modification. In accordance with the costsharing 
and financing concepts reflected in the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal 
sponsor must (1) provide all lands, easements, rights-ofway, 
and dredged material disposal areas including 
necessary retaining dikes presently estimated at 
$1,307,000, and bear all operation and maintenance costs 
for dikes presently estimated at $6,000 annually; (2) 
modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges 
(except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where 
necessary in the construction of the project, presently 
estimated at $17,059,000; (3) pay 25 percent of the costs 
allocated to deep draft navigation during construction 
presently estimated at $7,220,000 and reimburse an 
additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft 
navigation within a period of 30 years following 
completion of construction (which is entirely offset by a 
credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rightsof-
way, relocations (except utility relocations), and 
dredged material disposal areas; and (4) pay 25 percent 
of the first costs allocated to fish and wildlife 
enhancement presently estimated at $1,484,000, and pay 
25 percent of the costs of operation, maintenance, and 
replacement of fish and wildlife facilities presently 
estimated at $15,000 annually. 
Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, 
piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing 
space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These 
facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. 
(For further details, see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, 
Corps of Engineers.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Between October 1, 1994 and September 30, 1995, 
the contract dredges R.S. Weeks, R.N. Weeks and Padre 
Island removed 945,000 cubic yards from shoals in the 
ocean bar at a Federal cost of $4,288,343 and 637,543 
cubic yards at a contributed funds cost of $1,579,539. 
Maintenance: Between October 1, 1994 and September 
30,1995, the contract dredgesR.S. Weeks,R.N. Weeks and 
Padre Island removed 409,780 cubic yards from shoals 
in the ocean bar at a cost of $2,007,995. Between October 
14, 1994 and January 19, 1995, the contract dredge 
Arlington removed 822,528 cubic yards from shaols in 
the anchorage basin at a Federal cost of $1,261,719 and 
112,782 cubic yards at the state Ports at a contributed 
funds cost of $231,203. Between December 5, 1994, and 
September 30, 1995, the contract dredge Bill Johnson 
DW 668 removed 543,263 cubic yards from shoals in the 
river channel at a cost of $1,877,674. Between August 
29 and September 30, 1995, the contract dredgeArlington 
removed 105,476 cubic yards from shoals in the river 
channel at a cost of $1,063,527. Repairs at Eagle Island 
were performed at a contributed funds cost of $59,858. 
During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell 
conducted clearing and snagging operations and 
maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a 
cost of $149,700. Engineering and design for future year 
dredging of the anchorage basin cost $31,311. 
Engineering and design for future year dredging of Smith 
Island Channel cost $47,880. Engineering and design 
for future year dredging of the widener to the anchorage 
basin cost $2,916. Work in connection with prior year 
dredging of the river channel cost $54,057. Hilton Wreck 
damage assessment site documentation cost $6,359. 
Ocean dumping monitoring cost $64,719. Environmental 
and permitting activities for sea turtle research project 
cost $20,479. Study distribution of endangered species, 
Shortnose Sturgeon, cost $7,431. Condition and 
operation studies cost $630,108. Disposal of dredged 
material (Section 933) study at Bald Head Island cost 
$85,007. Dredged material management plan 
preliminary assessment cost $8,525. Improvement study 
of maintenance dredging processes cost $19,642. 
Sedimentation reevaluation of ocean disposal cost $8,776. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion 
of the project was completed October 1982 except for 
latest modification. (For further details, see Annual 
Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to 
September 30, 1995, was $124,267,018 of which 
6-8 
REPORT ON~I CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995

WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 
$22,594,741 was for new work, including $2,363,161 
contributed funds and $101,672,277 was for maintenance, 
including $7,121,017 contributed funds. The remaining 
uncompleted portion of the work authorized under the 
River and HarborAct of March 2, 1945, was deauthorized 
in accordance with Section 1001(b) (1), PL 99-662. 
Beach Erosion Control 
12. FORT FISHER AND VICINITY, N.C. 
Location. The project is located in New Hanover 
County, approximately 20 miles south ofWilmington, N.C., 
on the peninsula which separates the lower Cape Fear 
River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See quadrangle sheet, 
Kure Beach, N.C.) 
Existing project. The authorized project consists of 
the construction of a rubble mound revetment, 3,040 feet 
in length with a maximum crest elevation of 15 feet above 
mean sea level. In addition, the project includes the 
construction of a walking path, overlooks, and steps for 
beach access at both ends of the revetment to provide for 
public safety. The estimated Federal cost of the project is 
$4,170,000 (1995). The project was authorized by Section 
201 of the River and Harbor Flood Control Act of 1965. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must pay one-half 
of the separable cost allocated to recreation (partially 
offset by a credit for land, easement, rights of way and 
relocations), estimated at $4,170,000, and bear all costs 
of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation 
facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to 
make all required payments concurrently with project 
construction. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Preconstruction engineering and design was 
completed at a cost of $19,646. Construction was initiated 
at a Federal cost of $264,093 and a contributed funds 
cost of $1,439,928. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The contract was 
awarded in April 1995. Completion of construction is 
scheduled for August 31, 1996. 
Flood Control 
13. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. 
Location. Work covered by this project consists of a 
series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape 
Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles 
from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey 
Map of North Carolina.) 
Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved 
December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and 
reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries 
of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the 
comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th 
Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the 
appropriate agencies of the Departments oftheArmy and 
Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys 
and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape 
Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and 
flood prevention, and the conservation, development, 
utilization, and disposal of water. The report was prepared 
in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87-639. The 
study was unfavorable and has been submitted to 
Congress. No further action will be taken. A list of the 
dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan 
follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 
Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, 
except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake 
and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1990, and 
Howards Mill Lake in 1980. These three projects have 
been authorized for construction in accordance with the 
above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was 
deauthorized in July 1995 due to the current lack of 
economic justification. Randleman Lake was reclassified 
to the "deferred" category inApril 1992 due to the current 
lack of economic justification. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the 
individual project reports. 
13A. B. EVERETI' JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. 
Location. The project is located on the Haw River, 
N. C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of 
Moncure, N. C. 
Existing project. The project provides for an earth 
dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet 
above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute 
spillway, and a controlled 19-foot diameter outlet 
structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the 
spillway. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 
753,500 acre-feet, of which 538,400 acre-feet is for flood 
control and a conservation pool of 215,100 acre-feet for 
water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. 
The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated 
system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin 
and for water supply, water-quality control, and other 
purposes. Estimated Federal cost for new work is 
$147,600,000 (1995), consisting of $89,186,000 for 
construction, and $58,414,000 for lands and damages, 
including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The 
existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 
approved December 30,1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d 
sess.). 
Local cooperation. Local interests must protect 
downstream channels from encroachments and 
obstructions which would adversely affect operation of 
the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all 
costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, 
presently estimated at $3,700,000 and bear all annual 
costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements 
allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an 
amount presently estimated at $46,000 annually; and 
contribute toward the cost of the ranger security 
buildings, an amount presently estimated at $44,000. A 
contract between the State of N. C. and the United States 
for water supply storage space was executed byASA (CW) 
on April 10, 1988. In addition, the State of N. C. has leased 
the project for public park, recreational, fish, wildlife, and 
6-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
other natural resource management purposes and the 
estimated cost to the State for O&M under this lease is 
$806,000 annually. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Wilderness Island O&M Roads was initiated at a 
cost of $57,257. Rivers End O&M roads was initiated at 
a cost of $20,715. Parkers Creek recreation area 
modification was continued at a cost of $135,620. 
Crosswinds Marina sewer continued at a cost of $165,245. 
Seaforth recreation area claim completed at a cost of 
$71,674. Crosswinds Breakwater was completed at a cost 
of $5,276. Total Federal expenditures were $933,105, 
including above items. Status of plans and specs: 
Crosswinds Breakwater, 10 percent. Maintenance: 
Operation of Poes Ridge Recreation area cost $24,143. 
Paving improvement Poes Ridge access road and parking 
cost $5,169. Replacement of the waterline at the 
management center cost $24,553. Normal operation and 
maintenance cost $890,361. Maintenance and operation 
of dams cost $153,900. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. All facilities are 
basically complete except for recreation facilities, cultural 
resources and project operations facilities. Impoundment 
was completed in February 1982 with dedication on May 
1, 1982. Project completion is scheduled for February 
1997. 
14. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. 
Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 
15 miles southeast ofWilmington, N. C., on the peninsula 
which separates lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic 
Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) 
Existing project. The authorized project consists of 
two separable elements, the Carolina Beach Portion and 
Area South of Carolina Beach and provides for 
construction of a dune with a crown width of 25 feet at 
elevation 13.5 feet National geodetic vertical datum 
(NGVD), a berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 
10.5 feet NGVD for Carolina Beach and 9 feet NGVD for 
the Area South, a rock revetment at elevation 10.5 feet 
NGVD along the northern 2,050 feet fronted by a 130 
feet wide berm at elevation 6.5 feet NGVD, extending 
about 32,000 feet from the northern limits of Carolina 
Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach and Federal 
participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period 
not to exceed 50 years from year of initial placement. 
The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the 
active category, June 1985. Approved estimated Federal 
cost for new work is $177,580,000. The project was 
authorized by the 1962 Flood ControlAct (H.D. 418, 87th 
Cong. 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future 
nourishment for 50 years. 
Local cooperation. For the Carolina Beach portion, 
local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and 
rights-of-way for construction; (b) make required 
relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or 
structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first 
cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United 
States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after 
completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of 
the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances 
to provide for preservation of improvement and its 
protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent 
necessary to safeguaird health of bathers; and (i) at least 
annually inform interests affected that project will not 
provide any substantial protection from ocean surges 
higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 
15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for 
the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project only. 
For the Area South portion, local interests must: (a) 
provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including borrow 
areas; (b) pay 35 percent of the first costs of operation, 
maintenance and replacement of hurricane and storm 
damage reduction facilities; (c) contribute, in cash, 35 
percent of the total project cost; (d) inform affected 
interests of the limitation of the protection afforded by 
the project no less than once each year; (e) assure that 
water pollution which would endanger the health of 
bathers will not be permitted to the extent of its power; 
(f) assure the continued public ownership of the above 
shore and its administration for public use during the 
50 year economic life of the project; (g) to the extent of 
its powers, prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent 
obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would 
reduce the level of protection it affords or that would 
hinder operation or maintenance; and (h) provide and 
maintain necessary access roads, parking areas and other 
public use facilities open and available to all on equal 
terms. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Plans and specifications for the Carolina Beach 
portion cost $48,768. The reevaluation report for the 
Carolina Beach portion cost $14,279. The General Design 
Memorandum and plans and specifications for the Area 
South portion cost $243,094. Between February 27, and 
March 30, 1995, the contract dredge Alaska/144 
excavated 643,522 cubic yards to renourish the Carolina 
Beach portion of the project at a Federal cost of $1,893,867 
and 465,889 cubic yards at a contributed funds cost of 
$1,239,973. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction 
was completedAugust 12,1982, except for grassing which 
was completed in September 1983. The latest increment 
of renourishment for the Carolina Beach portion was 
completed in May 1995. The contract for initial 
renourishment of the Area South portion is scheduled 
for award in June 1996 with completion scheduled for 
December 1996. 
15. DANVILLE (SOUTHSIDE WASTEWATER 
TREATMENT PLANT), VA. 
Location. The project area is located in the City of 
Danville in Pittsylvania County in south-centralVirginia, 
approximately 50 miles northeast of Greensboro, N.C. 
(See USGS quadrangle sheet, Ringgold, Va. - N.C.) 
Existing project. The project will consist of a dike 
system around approximately one quarter of the 
Southside Sewage Treatment Plant. The dike will be 
constructed at an elevation equivalent to 3 feet above 
the 100-year frequency flood. This project will protect 
the control buildings which house electrical motors and 
6-10

WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT 
pumps for the Treatment Plant. The utility road located 
to the back of the control building and the existing dike 
will be raised to the designed elevation while a completely 
new dike section will be constructed connecting the 
existing dike and the entrance road at the designated 
elevation. 
Local cooperation. Local interest shall contribute a 
minimum of 25 percent, but not to exceed 50 percent, 
total project costs, estimated at $195,000; provide a cash 
contribution equal to 5 percent of total project costs; 
provide all lands, easements, rights-of way, including 
suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, as 
may be determined by the Government to be necessary 
for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the 
project; shall provide or pay to the Government the cost 
of providing all retaining dikes, wasteweirs, bulkheads, 
and embankments, including all monitoring features and 
stilling basins, that may be required at any dredged 
material disposal area necessary for the construction of 
the project; shall accomplish or arrange for 
accomplishment at no cost to the Government all 
relocations (excluding railroad bridges and approaches 
thereto) determined necessary for construction of the 
project; shall hold and save the Government free from 
all damages arising from the construction, operation, 
maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of 
the project and any project-related betterments, except 
for damages due to the fault or negligence of the 
Government and its contractors; and assume financial 
responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, 
as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is 
necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be 
considered part of the project costs, nor will the sponsor 
receive credit for such costs it incurs. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans 
and specifications were completed at a cost of $17,806. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and 
specifications were completed in June 1995. Construction 
is scheduled for 1997. 
16. HAMLET CITY LAKE, HAMLET, N. C. 
Location. The project is located on Marks Creek within 
the city limits of Hamlet, N. C. (See USGS quadrangle 
sheet, Hamlet, N. C.) 
Existing project. A small earth dam constructed in 
the 1930's under theWPA Program impounds the shallow 
50-acre lake. Much of the City's storm runoff empties 
into the lake and has contributed significantly to a 
sediment problem. Local interests desire removal of 
accumulated sediment and debris including construction 
of sediment traps and providing other devices or 
equipment to prevent and abate the further deposit of 
sediment. Results from the bottom sampling and testing 
program show that contaminants are much more 
widespread than originally estimated. The final scope of 
the project is being negotiated with the project sponsor. 
Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is 
$3,200,000 (1995). The project was authorized by the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Sec. 206, PL 
99-662). 
Local cooperation. Local interests must pay 25 
percent of the total cost of the project estimated at 
$1,070,000. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Planning, engineering, and design was continued 
at a cost of $137,982. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. A letter dated October 
16, 1992, was received from the sponsor supporting a 
project smaller in scope than the original project. City 
began design on disposal area. The Design Memorandum 
and Environmental Assessment are scheduled for 
completion in April 1996. Plans and specifications are 
scheduled for completion in June 1996 with contract 
award scheduled for August 1996. Project is scheduled 
for completion in March 1997. 
17. KING (WATER PLANT), NC 
Location. The project is located along theYadkin River, 
about 10 miles northwest of Winston-Salem, N.C. (See 
USGS quadrangle sheet, King, N.C.) 
Existing project. The project will consist of 
approximately 300 linear feet of riprap protection 
beginning at the north side of the water plant intake and 
extending 300 feet upstream along the east river bank. 
The toe of the bank protection will be keyed into the 
stream bed and extend to the top of the bank, 
approximately 18 feet. Approved estimated Federal cost 
for construction is $227,000 (1995). The project was 
approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on 
September 7, 1994, under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood 
Control Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all 
lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable 
borrow and disposal areas necessary for construction and 
subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; 
accomplish without cost to the United States all relocation 
and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, 
storm drains, utilities and other structures and 
improvements made necessary by the construction; 
provide, during the period of construction, an amount 
equal to not less than 25 percent of total project costs, 
estimated at $75,000, at least 5 percent of which will be 
cash; hold and save the United States free from damages 
due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, 
except damages due to the fault or negligence of the 
United States or its contractors; maintain and operate 
the project after completion without cost to the United 
States; assume full responsibility for all project costs in 
excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000 and 
assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous 
and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability 
Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will 
not be considered part of the total project costs, nor will 
the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans 
and specifications were completed at a cost of $42,439. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and 
specifications completed April 1995. Advertisment of 
contract is scheduled forApril 1996 with award scheduled 
for June 1996 and completion for June 1997. 
6-11 
C 
Ns

itEPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
18. LOWER CREEK, LENOIR, N. C. 
Location. The project is located in northwest North 
Carolina near the city of Lenoir in Caldwell County and 
is approximately 60 miles northwest of Charlotte and 
approximately 60 miles northeast ofAsheville. (See USGS 
quadrangle sheet, Lenoir, N. C.) 
Existing project. The authorized project involves 
about 1.4 miles of Lower Creek and .4 mile of Zacks Fort 
Creek of channel widening with a combination of 
trapezoidal and bench channel design. The improved 
channel bottom widths range from 50 to 75 feet, roughly 
doubling the size of the existing channel. Approved 
estimated Federal cost for construction is $2,010,000 
(1995). The project was approved by the Assistant 
Secretary of the Army on September 4, 1991, under 
Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all 
lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable 
disposal areas as may be determined by the Chief of 
Engineers to be necessary for construction and 
subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; 
accomplish without cost to the United States all 
relocations and alterations of buildings, transportation 
facilities, and other structures and improvements made 
necessary by the construction; provide, during the process 
of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 
percent of total project cost, estimated at $693,000, at 
least 5 percent of which will be cash. The amount to be 
provided shall include the value of cost of all lands, 
easements, rights-of-way, and facility and utility 
alterations and relocations necessary for construction and 
subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable 
excavated material disposal areas, as may be determined 
by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States 
free from damages due to the construction and 
subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault 
or negligence of the United States or its contractors; 
maintain and operate the project after completion without 
cost to the United States in accordance with regulations 
prescribed by the Secretary oftheArmy; at least annually 
inform affected interests that the channel will not provide 
complete flood protection and assume full responsibility 
for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation 
of $5,000,000. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Work in connection with resolution of real estate 
problems cost $385. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and 
specifications are substantially complete. The Local 
CooperationAgreement (LCA) was executed in November 
1991. Work has been suspended due to non-resolution of 
local sponsor real estate issues. 
19. N.C. AQUARIUM, DARE COUNTY, N.C. 
Location. The project area is located on the west side 
of Roanoke Island in eastern North Carolina near Manteo. 
(See quadrangle sheet, Manteo, N.C.) 
Existing project. The project consists of replacing 
approximately 760 linear feet of dilapidated timber 
bulkhead. The existing bulkhead will be demolished, the 
shoreline will be graded to a 3.OH:1.OV slope and armor 
stone will be placed on the slope. Approved estimated 
Federal cost for the project is $485,000 (1995). The project 
was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on 
August 3, 1995, under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood 
Control Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. Local interest shall contribute a 
minimum of 25 percent, but not to exceed 50 percent, 
total project costs, estimated at $191,000; provide a cash 
contribution equal to 5 percent of total project costs; 
provide all lands, easements, rights-of way, and suitable 
borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas 
that the Government determines for the construction, 
operation, and maintenance of the project; shall perform 
or ensure performance of all relocations that the 
Government determines to be necessary for the 
construction, operation and maintenance of the project; 
shall hold and save the Government free from all 
damages arising from the construction, operation, 
maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of 
the project and any project-related betterments, except 
for damages due to the fault or negligence of the 
Government and its contractors; assume full 
responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal 
cost limitation of $500,000; and assume financial 
responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, 
as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is 
necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be 
considered part of the project costs, nor will the sponsor 
receive credit for such costs it incurs. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans 
and specifications were completed at a cost of $25,637. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and 
specifications completed in August 1995. Construction 
scheduled for 1997. 
20. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. 
Location. Works covered by this project consist of a 
series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin 
in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from 
Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of 
North Carolina.) 
Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 
authorized construction of the Falls project as the key 
project in the recommended general plan of development 
of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide 
for immediate and future development of the basin's 
water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th 
Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the 
general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-J on 
Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based 
on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was 
revised in 1989. 
20A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. 
Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 
miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
an earth dam 1,915 feet long with a maximum height of 
95 feet above streambed. The dam has a 30-foot top 
6-12

WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT 
width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100 feet wide, is 
located in the east abutment. The reservoir has a gross 
storage capacity of 374,450 acre-feet, of which 243,050 
acre-feet is for flood control, 45,000 acre-feet for water 
supply for the city of Raleigh, 61,330 acre-feet for water 
quality control, and 25,070 acre-feet for sediment storage. 
The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a 
coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River 
Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, 
and other purposes. Estimated cost of new work is 
$183,000,000 (1995) consisting of $91,334,000 for 
construction and $91,666,000 for lands and damages, 
including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The 
project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act 
(H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent 
encroachment on downstream channels that would 
interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the 
United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act 
of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction 
cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at 
$13,637,000 and entire amount of operation, 
maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water 
supply, presently estimated at $116,000 annually, the final 
amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; 
administer project land and water areas for recreation 
and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in 
kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with 
interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project 
allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable 
cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the 
amount involved currently being estimated at 
$21,595,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, 
and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands 
and facilities, the amount involved currently being 
estimated at $1,544,000 on an average annual basis. 
Formal assurances have been received. The N. C. 
Department of Natural and Economic Resources has been 
authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of 
all non-Federal costs allocable to water supply in all 
Federal projects as required bylaw. The State will require 
repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract 
between the city of Raleigh and the United States for 
water-supply storage space was approved by the 
Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract 
agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and 
facilities in accordance with P.L. 89-72 was approved by 
the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A 
contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of P.L. 
91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Highway 50 Road modification was completed at a 
cost of $60,525. Tailrace Access recreation area 
modification was completed at a cost of $2,406. Sandling 
Beach modification was completed at a cost $6,145. 
Rollingview recreation area modification was continued 
at a cost of $206,212. B.W. Wells and Shinleaf recreation 
areas were continued at a cost of $89,060. Holly Point 
Recreation area was continued at a cost of $652,437. 
Wildlife Subimpoundments Maintenance Building was 
initiated at a cost Of $163,583. The Dam and Spillway 
modification was initiated at a Federal cost of $228,513 
and a contributed funds cost of $115,321. Total Federal 
expenditures were $2,244,996, including the above items. 
Status of plans and specs: Miscellaneous Improvements 
to Subimpoundments, 100 percent; Wildlife 
Subimpoundments Maintenance Building, 100 percent; 
Miscellaneous Paving at Highway 50 and Sandling Beach 
recreation areas, 100 percent. Maintenance: Flood gate 
indication and control system cost $9,948. Normal 
operation and maintenance cost $895,917. Maintenance 
and operations of dams cost $153,900. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Reservoir filling was 
completed on December 7, 1983. Dedication ceremonies 
were held on April 30,1983. All facilities are basically 
complete except for fish and wildlife facilities, recreation 
facilities, O & M facilities and project modifications due 
to the water storage shortage. Project completion is 
scheduled for August 1996. 
21. ORIENTAL(SOUTH AVENUE) N.C. 
Location. The project is located on the north bank of 
the Neuse River in Pamlico County, N.C., about 140 miles 
east of Raleigh (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Oriental, 
N.C.) 
Existing project. The recommended project will 
consist of approximately 990 linear feet of structural 
sheetpile protection of Neuse River shoreline at South 
Avenue between Vandermere and Freemason Streets. 
The sheetpile will be about 8 feet long and driven to the 
point of resistance. Approved estimated Federal cost for 
the project is $410,000 (1995). The project was approved 
by the Assistant Secretary of theArmy on September 23, 
1994, under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as 
amended. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all 
lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable 
borrow and disposal areas necessary for construction and 
subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; 
accomplish without cost to the United States all relocation 
and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, 
storm drains, utilities and other structures and 
improvements made necessary by the construction; 
provide, during the period of construction, an amount 
equal to not less than 25 percent of total project costs, 
estimated at $137,000, at least 5 percent of which will be 
cash; hold and save the United States free from damages 
due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, 
except damages due to the fault or negligence of the 
United States or its contractors; maintain and operate 
the project after completion without cost to the United 
States; assume full responsibility for all project costs in 
excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000 and 
assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous 
and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability 
Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will 
not be considered part of the total project costs, nor will 
the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. The 
plans and specifications were completed at a cost of 
$34,007. Construction was initiated at a cost of $210,000. 
6-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and 
specifications were completed and contract was 
advertisied in March 1995. Contract was awarded in July 
1995 with completeion scheduled for March 1996. 
22. ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, 
VIRGINIA, HEADWATERS AREA 
Location. The project is located on the Roanoke River 
in the City of Roanoke, Va. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, 
Roanoke, Va.) 
Existing project. The authorized plan includes about 
6.4 miles of channel widening along the 10-mile project 
reach through the City of Roanoke, Va. Channel widening 
will be accomplished with the construction of a benched 
channel above the elevation of the average streamflow. 
Other flood damage reduction features include 
floodproofing at one location, training walls to prevent 
floodwater intrusion into low areas along the river (total 
length 7,200 feet), replacement of two low-level bridges 
with constrict streamflows and a flood warning system. 
Recreation facilities consist of a 5-mile recreation trail 
along the project reach and access and parking areas. 
Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is 
$23,500,000. The project was authorized by the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (H.R. 6, PL 99-662). 
Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all 
lands, easements, and rights-of-way including spoil 
disposal areas presently estimated at $8,456,000; modify 
or relocate buildings, utilities, roads and other facilities 
except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction 
of the project presently estimated at $2,814,000; pay 25 
percent of the cost of flood warning system (partially offset 
by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way, and 
relocations) presently estimated at $11,000; pay 5 percent 
of the total cost allocated to flood control in cash in 
addition to all lands, easements, rights-of-way and 
relocations presently estimated at $1,539,000, and bear 
all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of 
flood control facilities presently estimated at $101,000, 
annually; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to 
recreation presently estimated at $1,514,000, (partially 
offset by a credit for land, easements, rights-of-way and 
relocations) and bear all costs of operation, maintenance 
and replacement of recreation facilities presently 
estimated at $9,000, annually; and pay 25 percent of the 
cost of non-structural floodproofing (partially offset by a 
credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations) 
presently estimated at $366,000. Fully complied with to 
date. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: HTW assessments and investigations were 
accomplished at a cost of $27,192. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The contract for the 
flood warning system was completed in January 1991. 
The contract for the sewage treatment plant floodproofing 
was awarded in August 1991 and completed in February 
1993. EPA identified two areas requiring HTW removal 
with clean up to occur in 1996. Construction contract for 
channel improvements is scheduled for award in July 
1997. Project completion is scheduled for July 2000. 
23. THOMASVILLE (WALNUT STREET), N.C. 
Location. The project area is located on North Hamby 
Creek in the City of Thomasville in Davidson County. 
Thomasville is in the Yadkin River basin in the central 
piedmont region of North Carolina about 20 miles south 
of Winston-Salem. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Fair 
Grove, N.C.) 
Existing project. The project will consist of replacing 
a failed retaining wall 25 feet long by 8 feet high. Riprap 
will be placed at the toe of the wall. New, well-drained 
backfill will be placed back of the wall. Pavement 
damaged due to erosion or construction activities will be 
replaced. Temporary berm silt fence, etc., will be used to 
control sediment during construction. Approved 
estimated Federal cost for construction is $20,900. The 
project was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the 
Army on February 1, 1995 under Section 14 of the 1946 
Flood Control Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. Local interest shall contribute a 
minimum of 25 percent, but not to exceed 50 percent, 
total project costs, estimated at $27,800; provide a cash 
contribution equal to 5 percent of total project costs; 
provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable 
borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas 
that the Government determines for the construction, 
operation, and maintenance of the project; shall perform 
or ensure performance of all relocations that the 
Government determines to be necessary for the 
construction, operation and maintenance of the project; 
shall hold and save the Government free from all 
damages arising from the construction, operation, 
maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of 
the project and any project-related betterments, except 
for damages due to the fault or negligence of the 
Government and its contractors; assume full 
responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal 
cost limitation of $500,000; and assume financial 
responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, 
as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is 
necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be 
considered part of the project costs, nor will the sponsor 
receive credit for such costs it incurs. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Construction was initiated and completed at a Federal 
cost of $30,972 and a contributed funds cost of $4,480. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and 
specifications were completed and project was advertised 
in March 29, 1995. Contract was awarded May 31, 1995, 
and construction was completed in September 1995. 
24. WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, N. C. 
Location. A small island 10 miles east of Wilmington, 
N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map p.834) 
Existing project. Construct a dune with a base 
bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width 
of 25 feet at elevation 15 feet above mean low water, 
together with integral construction of a beach berm with 
a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 
14,000 feet from Moores Inlet on the north to Masonboro 
6-14

WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT 
Inlet on the south. Existing project was authorized by 
1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 511, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). 
The Water Resources DevelopmentAct of 1986 authorized 
Federal participation in future nourishment for the life 
of the project. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Work in connection with prior year beach 
renourishment cost $23,450. The Alternate Material 
Source Study cost $16,167. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. All work under the 
initial authorization has been completed. The first 
renourishment under WRDA 86 was completed in May 
1991. The second renourishment was completed in June 
1994. The next renourishment is scheduled for 1998. 
25. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S. C. 
Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the 
Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows 
generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of 
Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles 
to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North 
Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. 
(See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) 
Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 
24,1946, authorized construction of four flood control 
dams in the UpperYadkin River Basin, two on theYadkin 
River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on 
Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made 
subsequent to authorization established the economic 
advantage of providing needed flood-control storage in 
only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the 
Yadkin. Present planning considers only the tworeservoir 
plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir 
constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott 
was transferred to the Wilmington District from 
Charleston in fiscal year 1980. Any future work on 
Reddies River will also be done by the Wilmington 
District. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 
25A .W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. 
Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on 
Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream 
from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 
feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles 
upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. 
Existing project. The project consists of a rolled 
earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 
1,107.5 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above 
streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment 
of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and 
outlet works consisting of an intake structure, control 
tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in 
diameter through the base of the dam near the south 
abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 
acre-feet of which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood 
control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water 
supply, and 8,000 acre-feet being contained in the 
minimum pool. Estimated cost is $9,110,000 (1983) for 
new work. The existing project was authorized by the 
1946 Flood Control Act. 
Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For 
details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance:Installation of underground fuel tanks cost 
$923. Replacement of management center was continued 
at a cost $316,685. Indication and control system/flood 
gates cost $9,692. Conversion of package plants to septic 
tile fields cost $279,004. Road paving and repaving cost 
$311. Periodic inspection cost $760. Investigation and 
repairs of stilling basin cost $12,029. Normal operation 
and maintenance cost $1,372,471. Maintenance and 
operation of dams cost $153,900. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 
commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for 
flood control and water storage purposes inAugust 1962. 
26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
To determine the extent of compliance with approved 
regulations for maintenance and operation, review and 
inspections were made for the following projects during 
fiscal year 1995: Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.; 
Gapway Swamp, Columbus County, N. C.; Old Field 
Swamp, Robeson County, N. C.; Gardners Creek, Martin 
County, N. C.; New River, Onslow County, N. C.; Pungo 
Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; South Creek, Beaufort 
County, N. C.; Pungo River, Beaufort County, N. C.; Filberts 
Creek, Edenton, N.C.; Pantego and Cucklers Creek, 
Beaufort County, N.C.; White Oak Dike, Bladen and 
Pender Counties, N. C.; Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, 
N. C.; Pasquotank Dike, Pasquotank County, N. C.; 
Perquimans River, Perquimans County, N. C.; Core Creek, 
Craven County, N. C.; Princeville Dike, Edgecombe 
County, N. C.; Swift Creek, Pitt County, N. C.; Carolina 
Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Wrightsville Beach, 
New Hanover County, N. C.; Goldsboro, Neuse River, 
Wayne County, N. C.; Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. 
C.; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.; Black River, 
Harnett County, N. C.; Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.; Deep 
Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Joyce Creek, Camden 
County, N. C.; Ararat River, Surry County, N. C.; South 
Mayo River, Stuart, Va; and Leith Creek, Scotland County, 
N. C. Responsible local officials were advised of 
inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood 
protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period 
was $6,501. Total cost to September 30, 1995, was 
$516,488, charged to operations. 
27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public 
Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). 
(See Table 6-K.) 
Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood 
and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized 
projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent 
legislation). 
6-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
National Emergency Preparedness Program cost 
$112,238. Disaster Preparedness Program cost $188,850. 
Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 
28. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N. C. 
Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its 
tributaries in Virginia and North Carolina within a radius 
of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. 
Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 
approved a general plan for the comprehensive 
development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control 
and other purposes, and authorized construction of John 
H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Table 6-J for a list 
of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive 
plan.) 
Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and 
Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the 
comprehensive plan that have been authorized for 
construction. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 
28A. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, 
VA. AND N. C. 
Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 
river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, 
Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, 
Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke 
River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on 
the right and left banks, with a total length of about 
22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a 
coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River 
Basin for control of floods, generation of hydroelectric 
power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other 
purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. 
(For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) 
Estimated cost is $67,529,000 (1983) for construction and 
$24,521,000 for lands and damages, including relocation 
of highways, railroads, and utilities, a total of $92,050,000 
for new work. The existing project was authorized by 
the 1944 Flood Control Act. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: The removal of flood debris cost $54,125. 
Periodic inspection of the dam bridge cost $231. Road 
paving and repaving cost $47,870. Mapping and land 
allocation classification for master plan cost $8,866. 
Stripped Bass Recruitment Study cost $2,716. 
Replacement and installation of wicket gates cost 
$146,725. Island Creek Pumping Station Abandonment 
Study cost $906. Locating the borrow area and initiating 
the General Design Memorandum for the earth dike 
modification cost $58,617. North Bend Park waste water 
treatment plant monitoring wells cost $28,458. 
Archeological documentation and National Register 
evaluation of Long Grass Plantation barn cost $3,228. 
Renovation of Rudds Creek recreation area cost of 
$14,448. Painting of the gantry crane cost $123,376. 
Preparation of preliminary assessment for DDT and 
Dioxin sites cost $1,713. Investigations and inspection 
of headgates, tail gates and stop logs cost $907. 
Replacement of sump structure in powerhouse cost 
$5,191. Surge arrestors for the powerhouse cost $37,870. 
Rehab study of seven main units in powerhouse cost 
$9,325. Preparation and update of Water Control Plan 
and Reservoir Regulation Manual cost $43,616. Repairs 
to headgate lifting chains cost $17,222. Replacement of 
general cooling water piping in the powerhouse cost 
$3,454. Painting switchyard structure in powerhouse 
cost $26,915. Cultural Resources Survey of Rochichi 
Wildlife Management Center cost $21,410. Normal 
operation and maintenance cost $6,485,874. Maintenance 
and operation of dams cost $153,900. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete 
except for additional recreational facilities. Production 
of power and protection from floods are provided by 
project. 
28B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. 
Location. The project is located on Smith River, 
Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, 
and 35 miles upstream from Virginia-North Carolina 
State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum 
height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a 
coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the 
Roanoke River Basin, generation of hydroelectric power, 
regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The 
powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. 
(For further details seeAnnual Report for 1962.) Federal 
cost estimate is $13,933,000 (1983) for construction and 
$1,157,000 for lands and damages, a total of $15,090,000. 
Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control 
Act. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Replacing powerhouse roof cost $16,585. 
Investigations and repairs of riverbank erosion at the 
dam/tailrace cost $23,213. Normal operation and 
maintenance cost $1,862,985. Maintenance and operation 
of dams cost $153,900. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 
complete except for additional recreational facilities, and 
is providing power and flood protection. 
29. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL 
RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 
B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, located in the Cape 
Fear River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1995 
at elevation 215.38 feet, mean sea level (m.s.1.) or 0.62 
foot below guide curve. Below normal rainfall early in 
October produced the minimum elevation of the fiscal 
year of 214.75 feet, m.s.l. or 1.25 feet below guide curve 
6-16

BHHTT 'iO TLOI[ 
WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 
on October 13. A severe thunderstorm with heavy rainfall 
helped Jordan Lake to recover to just below the guide 
curve on October 16. Jordan Lake stayed just below the 
guide curve through early January when heavy rains 
pushed Jordan Lake to 219.76 feet, m.s.l. or 3.76 feet above 
the guide curve. Jordan Lake returned to the guide curve 
until a significant five day rainfall event caused the lake 
to rise to 224.07 feet, m.s.l. or 8.07 feet above guide curve 
on February 20. After two minor flood events in early 
March, Jordan Lake returned to and remained near guide 
curve through mid-June. A heavy rainfall event then 
caused Jordan Lake to rise to the maximum elevation of 
the fiscal year at 224.14 feet, m.s.l. or 8.14 feet above 
guide curve. Jordan Lake returned to guide curve in mid- 
July and dropped to elevation 214.86 on August 27 due 
to dry conditions. A small flood event then pushed Jordan 
up to elevation 219.26 feet, m.s.l. or 3.26 feet above the 
guide curve on August 29. Jordan Lake ended the fiscal 
year at elevation 215.21 feet, m.s.l. or 0.79 foot below guide 
curve. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the 
fiscal year was 25 percent and conservation pool storage 
remaining during the low elevation was 88 percent. Flood 
damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1995 were 
$9,180,000 raising the cumulative total since inception 
of the project in 1981 to $28,339,900. Total cost of 
functional operation for the period was $120,536. 
Falls Lake, located in the Neuse River Basin, North 
Carolina, began FiscalYear 1995 at elevation 248.16 feet, 
m.s.l. or 2.84 feet below guide curve. Due to below average 
inflow, the Falls Lake level gradually dropped through 
early January 1995 to the minimum elevation of the fiscal 
year at elevation 247.18 feet, m.s.l. or 2.92 feet below guide 
curve on January 6. Additional rainfall helped the lake 
level to recover back to guide curve by mid-January. Falls 
Lake remained near guide curve through mid-February 
when heavy rains produced a flood peak of 254.04 feet, 
m.s.l. or 3.94 feet above the guide curve on February 19. 
Falls Lake then remained near guide curve through the 
end of March except for two minor flood peaks of 252.44 
and 252.88 feet, m.s.l. on March 3 and 10, respectively. 
Below average rainfall and inflows caused Falls Lake to 
drop below guide curve through the end of May 1995. 
Falls Lake was at elevation 249.74 feet, m.s.l. or 1.26 feet 
below the guide curve on May 27 when rainfall helped 
the lake to recover to near guide curve. The maximum 
elevation of the fiscal year occurred on July 1, when Falls 
Lake peaked at 255.99 feet, m.s.l. or 4.99 feet above the 
guide curve. After returning to guide curve, dry conditions 
caused the level of Falls Lake to drop below guide curve. 
Falls Lake dropped to 249.78 feet, m.s.1. or 2.22 feet below 
the guide curve onAugust 24, recovered about a foot with 
rainfall and then continued to drop downwards again. 
Below normal rainfall and inflows continued for the 
remainder of the fiscal year caused the lake level to fall 
to 249.38 feet, m.s.1. or 1.62 feet below the guide curve by 
the end of September. The maximum flood pool storage 
utilized during the year was 36 percent, and the lowest 
conservation pool storage remaining was 67 percent. 
Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1995 were 
$8,777,000 making the cumulative total since inception 
of the project in 1983 of $63,777,000. Total cost of 
t 8.E o .La.m ,,9'I 
functional operation for the period was $77,4 1 91 fT .aI 
John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, located in the 
Roanoke River Basin Virginia and North Carolina, began 
Fiscal Year 1995 at elevation 298.39 feet, m.s.l. or 1.11 
feet below the guide curve. The reservoir level intersected 
a dropping guide curve on October 19, and fluctuated 
slightly near the guide curve through mid-January 1995. 
The minimum elevation for the fiscal year of 295.22 feet, 
m.s.l. or 0.28 foot below the guide curve occurred on 
January 6, 1995. Several storm events produced three 
minor flood peaks of 301.20 feet, m.s.l. on January 22, 
298.45 feet, m.s.l. on February 21, and 302.44 feet, m.s.1. 
on March 13. Drier conditions prevailed in the latter half 
of March and continued through April. As a result, the 
level of Kerr Reservoir dropped to as much as 2.5 feet 
below the guide curve about mid-April and fluctuated 
between one to two feet below guide curve through the 
end of May. Excessive wet conditions began in early June 
with the level of Kerr Reservoir rising above the guide 
curve. The month of June had an average rainfall of 11.21 
inches over the Kerr watershed. This was the most rainfall 
of any June since records began in 1891.A heavy rainfall 
in the latter part of June produced the maximum 
elevation of the fiscal year of 313.37 feet, m.s.l. or 13.87 
feet above the guide curve. Kerr Reservoir was pulled 
down to guide curve in earlyAugust. Extra releases were 
made through mid-August with Kerr Reservoir being 
drawn down to elevation 296.69 feet, m.s.l. or 2.81 feet 
below the guide curve. Below normal rainfall through 
September caused the level of Kerr Reservoir to remain 
one to two feet below guide curve for the remainder of 
the fiscal year. Kerr Reservoir ended the fiscal year at 
298.36 feet, m.s.l. or 1.14 feet below guide curve. In 
cooperation with State and Federal fish and wildlife 
agencies, the Wilmington District continued the operation 
of a trial fish flow regime started in Fiscal Year 1989 in 
the lower Roanoke River to enhance the striped bass 
spawning from April 1 to June 15. Maximum flood pool 
storage utilized during the year was 60.2 percent. The 
contractual power pool storage remaining at the lowest 
elevation during the year was 30 percent. Gross 
generation for the fiscal year amounted to 390,622,300 
kilowatt-hours or 8 percent below normal and net 
marketed power revenue was $6,162,650, making a 
cumulative total of $171,918,064 since inception of the 
project in 1952. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal 
Year 1995 were $2,751,600, making a cumulative total of 
$173,668,500 since 1952. Total cost of functional operation 
for the period was $332,740. 
Philpott Lake, located on the Smith River in the Dan 
River Basin, Virginia, began FiscalYear 1995 at elevation 
971.17 feet, m.s.1. or 0.33 foot below guide curve. Due to 
dry conditions, the level of Philpott Lake continuously 
fell more below guide curve through the months of 
October and November and was near elevation 970 feet, 
m.s.1. in early December. Heavy rainfall helped Philpott 
Lake to recover to the guide curve by mid-December. The 
lake level remained near guide curve through mid- 
January when heavy rains pushed Philpott Lake to the 
maximum elevation of the fiscal year at elevation 975.30 
6-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
feet, m.s.l. or 3.8 feet above the guide curve on January 
16. The late level was gradually drawn down to the guide 
curve by mid-February and remained near the guide curve 
through early May. A minor flood event occurred in mid- 
May when Philpott Lake rose to elevation 974.34 feet, 
m.s.l. or 0.84 foot above the guide curve. A significant 
rainfall event caused Philpott Lake to rise to elevation 
975.13 feet, m.s.l. or 1.63 feet above the guide curve on 
June 29. Extreme dry conditions then prevailed for the 
remainder of the fiscal year in the drainage area above 
Philpott Dam. Philpott Lake fell below guide curve on 
July 11. The minimum elevation of the fiscal year at 966.05 
feet, m.s.l.or 5.45 feet below guide curve occurred on 
Septmeber 29. The lake level ended for the fiscal year at 
966.07 feet, m.s.l. or 5.43 feet below guide curve. Maximum 
flood pool storage utilized during the year was 11.1 
percent. The contractual power pool storage remaining 
at the lowest elevation during the year was 62 percent. 
Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 
22,432,708 kilowatt hours or 14 percent below normal and 
net marketed power revenue was $669,375 making a 
cumulative total since inception of the project in 1953 of 
$24,864,769. Flood damages prevented during FiscalYear 
1995 were $1,437,000 making the cumulative total of 
$291,442,000. Total cost of functional operation for the 
period was $108,596. 
W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, located in the 
Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal 
Year 1995 at elevation 1030.11 feet, m.s.l. or 0.11 foot 
above the guide curve. W. Kerr Scott Reservoir fluctuated 
slightly above the guide curve through October and 
November. A minor flood peak of 1033.64 fee, m.s.l. or 
3.64 feet above guide curve occurred on December 5, 1994. 
The reservoir level returned to guide curve and remained 
there until mid-January when heavy rainfall caused the 
maximum elevation for the fiscal year of 1049.73 feet, 
m.s.l. or 19.73 feet above the guide curve on January 16, 
1995. After dropping back to the guide curve, drier 
conditions prevailed and produced the minimum elevation 
for the fiscal year on March 11, when W. Kerr Scott 
Reservoir fell to 1029.90 feet, m.s.l. or 0.10 foot below guide 
curve. W. Kerr Scott remained near guide curve through 
April except for two minor flood peaks of 1031.94 and 
1031.63 feet, m.s.l. on March 9 and April 21, respectively. 
W. Kerr Scott remained near the guide curve through the 
remainder of the fiscal year except for two more minor 
flood peaks of 1033.11 and 1032.01 feet, m.s.l. on June 3 
andAugust 28, respectively. The reservoir ended the fiscal 
year at elevation 1030.05 feet, m.s.1. or 0.05 foot above 
guide curve. Maximum flood pool storage utilized durig 
the fiscal year was 32 percent, and the conservation pool 
storage remaining was 99 percent at the minimum 
elevation. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 
1995 were $6,096,300 raising the cumulative total since 
inception of the project in 1963 to $139,202,100. Total cost 
of functional operation for the period was $87,234. 
General Investigations 
30. SURVEYS 
Cost for the period was $1,022,115 of which $484,682 
was for navigation studies, $439 was for flood control 
studies, $315,556 was for beach erosion studies, $38,565 
for Environmental Services Partnerships, $58,433 for 
Special Investigations, $1,773 for FERC licenses review, 
$23,000 for interagency water resources development, 
$8,000 for National Estuary studies, $5,826 for the North 
American Waterfowl Management Plan, $6,087 for 
cooperation with other Water Resource Agencies, $17,698 
for National Marine Fisheries Services, and $62,934 for 
cooperation with states. Contributed funds in the amount 
of $370,225 were expended for navigation studies, 
$220,485 for beach erosion studies and $50,525 for 
cooperation with states. 
31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 
Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 
206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise 
compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a 
State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on 
floods and flood damages, including identification of areas 
subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes 
and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of 
Federal and non-Federal interests and agencies in the 
use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other 
Federal agencies and local interests for their use in 
planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for 
the period were $330,198. Total costs to September 30, 
1995 were $6,418,743. Contributed funds in the amount 
of $7,765 were expended for flood plain information 
studies. 
32. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 
AND DESIGN 
Precontruction engineering and design (PED) for 
Wilmington Harbor, Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C., 
was continued at a cost of $39,143. PED was continued 
on Brunswick County Beaches, N. C., at a cost of $601,219. 
PED was accomplished on Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, 
N.C., at a cost of $15,601. PED was continued for 
Wilmington Harbor, Ocean Bar, N. C., at a cost of $14,030. 
PED was accomplished on Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. 
C., at a cost of $19,646. PED was continued on Wilmington 
Harbor channel widening, N.C., at a cost of $350,011. 
6-18

WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 
TABLE 6-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept. 30, 1995 
1. Aquatic Plant Control 
(R&H Act of 1965) 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
2. Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway between 
Norfolk, Va. & St. 
John River, Fla. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
3. Cape Fear River, 
N.C. above 
Wilmington 
4. Drum Inlet, N.C. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
5. Lockwoods Folly 
River, N.C. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
6. Manteo (Shallowbag) 
Bay, N.C. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
20,000 
47,230 
24,000 
31,944 
215,000 
184,383 
60,000 
89,091 
920,400 
914,693 
- 31,809 
- 31,8091 
5,465,000 5,480,000 
5,885,226 5,042,624 
7,555,800 9,682,140 
8,011,687 9,578,230 
1,715,500 
2,038,622 
8,852,694 
8,720,817 
3,079,000 
3,255,406 
5,951,622 
6,189,726 
61,524,4732 
61,406,7852 
138,600,0713 
138,560,4723 
- 86,851 
- 86,8514 
- 667,300 
- 667,300 
- 3,759,5735 
- 3,759,5735 
754,900 1,512,616 
896,066 1,510,351 
1,373,000 
1,368,629 
722,313 20,881,1506 
714,506 20,865,3046 
152,619 
152,619 
683 
92,000 
89,870 
139,200 
140,504 
54,153 1,351,932 
54,468 1,351,421 
- 13,500 
- 13,500 
- 241,272' 
- 241,2728 
663,000 2,143,800 
663,454 2,143,800 
688,100 
688,100 
319,399 9,548,192 
319,399 9,548,192 
- 92,650 
- 92,6509 
152,879 
6,080,310 
6,100,398 
-27,781 
18,736 
6,489,100 
6,437,259 
181,046 
28,338 
75,000 
11,123 
2,012,800 
2,063,400 
140,000 
239,964 
175,000 8.856,94510 
199,448 8,809,90010 
5,178,676 
5,171,301 
281,888 
329,610 
80,505,492 
80,425,751 
2,494,368 
2,489,346 
6-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept. 30, 1995 
7. Morehead City 
Harbor, N.C. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
8. Rollinson Channel, 
N.C. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
9. Silver Lake 
Harbor, N.C. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
10. Waterway connecting 
Pamlico Sound and 
Beaufort Harbor, N.C. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
11. Wilmington Harbor, N.C. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
12. Fort Fisher and 
Vicinity, N.C. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
- 90,000 
- 9,863 
1,973,000 3,502,600 
,971,000 3,362,252 
- 370,000 
-730 398,000 
18,355 - 
184,640 4,244 
184,640 2,836 
- - 
681,000 15,000 
681,000 10,568 
486,500 - 
486,500 - 
8,155,000 2,614,000 
8,256,978 2,683,797 
895,614 
776,142 
250,000 
217,124 
522,402 
683,337 
323,000 
160,629 
6,745,000 
6,648,791 
5,413,000 
5,555,166 
2,516,000 
2,731,996 
34,000 
374,482 
15,500 
16,908 
308,200 
312,408 
-176,346 13,204,70711 
- 13,204,70711 
1,785,181 59,881,40912 
1,768,902 59,864,94812 
-155 2,731,996 
- 2,731,996 
-57,518 1,749,812 
- 1,747,812 
- 589,105 
- 589,105 
26,827 1,948,434 
26,827 1,948,434 
- 41,142 
- 41,142 
- 184,284 
- 184,284 
153,524 7,842,598 
153,748 7,842,598 
- - 75,000 
- - 75,000 
- - 502,567 
- - 502,567 
41,964 23,649 3,499,282 
41,964 23,430 3,499,063 
- - 2,452 
- - 2,452 
5,266,000 7,333,000 31,314,22613 
1,853,625 4,288,343 24,857,19413 
5,854,900 
5,595,287 
1,350,000 
783,622 
273,839 
248,693 
107,000 
191,601 
7,291,556 95,413,52314 
7,347,825 95,153,87414 
1,050,000 
1,579,539 
249,225 
291,061 
900,000 
283,739 
1,520,000 
1,439,928 
2,400,000 
2,363,161 
7,300,21015 
7,300,06815 
2,076,00016 
1,440,093"17 
1,520,00018 
1,439,92818 
6-20

WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 
TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept. 30, 1995 
13. B. Everett Jordon 
Dam and Lake, N.C. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
14. Carolina Beach and 
Vicinity, N.C. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
15. Danville (Southside Wastewater 
Treatment Plant), Va. 
16. Hamlet City 
Lake, N.C. 
17. King (Waterplant), N.C. 
18. Lower Creek, 
Lenoir, N.C. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
19. N.C. Aquarium, 
Dare County, N.C. 
20A. Falls Lake, N.C. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
21. Oriental (South 
Avenue), N.C. 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Aprop. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
2,300,000 
1,902,208 
1,047,000 
1,066,026 
-56,654 
5,567 
678,000 
553,602 
-12,357 
42,947 
27,643 
210,354 
30,495 
2,891,000 
3,041,505 
1,050,000 
1,024,153 
400,000 
338,970 
25,000 
8,287 
52,399 
25,000 
20,077 
15,000 
7,138 
1,300,000 
359,712 
1,101,800 
1,078,502 
75,346 
933,105 
1,067,000 
1,100,006 
334,000 2,760,000 
516,295 2,200,009 
- 1,239,973 
- 1,239,973 
1,000 
24,646 
2,355,000 
90,633 
20,000 
19,877 
29,000 
46,879 
19,000 
17,806 
137,982 
43,200 
42,439 
-14,000 
385 
146,710,987 
146,074,820 
13,488,64319 
13,399,36620 
1,764,735 
1,764,735 
14,966,533 
14,349,655 
9,165,07021 
9,165,07021 
85,00022 
83,76723 
3,155,000 
959,672 
88,20024 
82,39325 
530,50026 
524,37827 
- 114,00028 
- 114,00028 
- 10,000 
- 5,601 
4,434,000 7,175,000 
4,490,985 5,184,215 
1,015,700 1,104,000 
1,077,207 945,624 
- 25,000 
- 15,368 
5,000 
9,399 
3,700,000 
4,051,304 
40,000 
25,637 
1,205,000 
2,244,996 
961,200 1,015,000 
1,056,414 1,057,765 
- 251,268 
- 115,321 
20,000 251,000 
29,539 244,007 
- 137,000 
- 70,000 
55,00029 
40,63730 
180,799,996 
179,782,634 
13,757,56119 
13,730,40120 
251,268 
115,321 
296,00031 
288,91432 
137,000 
70,000 
22. Roanoke River Upper Basin New Work: 
Va. - Headwaters Area Approp. 
(Regular Funds) Cost 
(Contributed Funds) New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
745,000 
880,321 
17,286 
122,389 
841,000 
815,174 
26,561 
46,586 
-14,000 2,181,000 
27,192 2,147,588 
626,586 
580,855 
6-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept. 30, 1995 
23. Thomasville New Work: 
(Walnut Street), N.C. Approp. - - 31,000 25,500 56,5003 
(Regular Funds) Cost - - 24,367 31,972 55,33934 
New Work: 
(Contributed Funds) Contrib. - - - 5,300 5,30035 
Cost - - - 4,480 4,480 
24. Wrightsville Beach, New Work: 
N.C. Approp. - 170,000 850,000 -106,000 3,529,100 
(Regular Funds) Cost - 135,573 672,467 39,617 3,462,757 
(Contributed Funds) New Work: 
Contrib. - - 398,545 - 2,620,7296 
Cost - - 398,545 - 2,620,72936 
25A. W Kerr Scott Dam New Work: 
and Reservoir, N.C. Approp. - - - - 8,841,326 
Cost - - - - 8,841,326 
Maint: 
Approp. 1,774,400 1,785,600 2,023,800 2,011,000 27,272,90437 
Cost 1,961,125 1,621,288 1,949,634 2,145,775 27,121,26338 
28A. John H. Kerr Dam New Work: 
and Reservoir, Va. & N.C. Aprop. - - - - 94,402,927 
(Regular Funds) Cost - - - - 94,402,927 
Maint: 
Approp. 7,116,000 7,732,500 6,608,300 7,057,099 117,524,68839 
Cost 7,161,602 7,092,732 6,798,175 7,296,963 116,872,63440 
(Contributed Funds) Maint: 
Contrib. - 7,000 - - 7,000 
Cost - 7,000 - - 7,000 
28B. Philpott Lake, Va. New Work: 
Approp. - - - - 14,796,384 
Cost - - - - 14,796,384 
Maint: 
Approp. 1,913,300 1,989,000 2,171,800 1,977,000 36,136,49641 
Cost 1,957,479 1,908,300 2,146,993 2,056,683 36,009,00642 
1. Includes $2,369 refund to local interests in FY 82. 
2. Includes $198,707 for previous projects. 
3. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. 
4. Includes $13,934 refund to local interests. 
5. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. 
6. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. 
7. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; 
FY 65, -$2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 
75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; 
FY 79, $3,000; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning 
funds: FY 80, $15,000 and FY 81, $19,320. 
8. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; 
FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, 
$9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; 
FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction 
planning costs: FY 80, $5,686 and FY 81, $1,471. 
9. Includes $69,145 refund to local interests. 
10. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual costs. 
11. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 
12. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 
13. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 
14. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 
15. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 78, $92,374; FY 
79, $8,000; FY 80, $14,007; FY 81, $1,847; FY 82, $2,823; FY 
85, $60,000. 
16. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 93, $10,000; 
FY 84, $5,000 and preconstruction planning and construction 
funds: FY 95, $40,000. 
17. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 93, $5,601; 
FY 94, $9,399 and preconstruction planning and construction 
costs: FY 95, $25,637. 
18. All contributed funds and costs thru FY 95 are for 
construction. 
19. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams funds: 
FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; 
FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; 
FY 95, $153,900. 
20. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams costs: 
FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; 
FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; 
FY 95, $153,900. 
6-22

WILMINGTON, N, C., DISTRICT 
TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
21. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 83, $400,000; 
FY 84, $128,345; FY 85, $82,600. 
22. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 91, $40,000; 
FY 93, $25,000; and preconstruction planning and construction 
funds: FY 94, $1,000 and FY 95, $19,000. 
23. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 91, $5,385; 
FY 92, $27,643; FY 93, $7,562; and preconstruction planning 
and construction costs: FY 93, $725; FY 94, $24,646 and FY 95, 
$17,806. 
24. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 93, $25,000 
and FY 94, $20,000; and preconstruction planning and 
construction funds: FY 95, $43,200. 
25. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 93, $20,077 
and FY 94, $19,877; and preceonstruction planning and 
construction costs: FY 95, $42,439. 
26. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 84, $42,500; 
FY 85, $25,000; FY 86, $20,000; FY 87, $85,000; FY 88, $67,000; 
FY 89, $17,000; and preconstruction planning and construction 
funds: FY 90, $125,000; FY 91, $119,000; FY 93, $15,000; FY 
94, $29,000; and FY 95, -$14,000. 
27. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 84, $32,715; 
FY 85, $18,492; FY 86, $31,355; FY 87, $67,544; FY 88, $86,581; 
FY 89, $17,876 and FY 90, $1,937; and preconstruction planning 
and construction costs: FY 91, $182,981; FY 92, $30,495; FY 93, 
$7,138; FY 94, $46,878; and FY 95, $385. 
28. All contributed funds and cost thru FY 91 are for 
preauthorization study. 
29. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 93, $10,000; 
FY 94, $5,000; and preconstruction planning and construction 
funds: FY 95, $40,000. 
30. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 93, $5,601; 
FY 94, $9,300; and preconstruction planning and construction 
costs: FY 95, $25,637. 
31. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 93, $25,000; 
FY 94, $20,000; and preconstruction planning and construction 
funds: FY 95, $251,000. 
32. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 93, $15,368; 
FY 94, $29,539; and preconstruction planning and construction 
costs: FY 95, $244,007. 
33. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 94, $31,000; 
and preconstruction planning and construction funds: FY 95, 
$25,500. 
34. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 94, $24,367; 
FY 95, $2; and preconstruction planning and construction costs: 
FY 95, $30,972. 
35. All contributed funds and cost thru FY 95 are for 
construction. 
36. Includes $61,585 refund to local interests. 
37. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, 
$4,000; FY 75, $5,500; FY 76 & 76 T, $3,600; FY 77, $5,800; FY 
78, $7,200; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $10,000; FY 81, $10,000; FY 
82, $11,040; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $9,000; and maintenance 
and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; 
FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,200; 
FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 
38. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 74, 
$4,000; FY 75, $4,400; FY 76 & 76T, $4,666; FY 77, $5,193; FY 
78, $6,824; FY 79, $7,506; FY 80, $11,312; FY 81, $9,688; FY 
82, $9,727; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $8,444; FY 85, $2,379; and 
maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 
88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; 
FY 92, $79,200; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, 
$153,900. 
39. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, 
$35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $48,000; FY 77, $51,400; FY 78, $115,100; 
FY 79, $63,000; FY 80, $60,000; FY 81, $80,000; FY 82, $67,160; 
FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $73,000; and maintenance and operation 
of Dams funds: FY 79, $167,646; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; 
FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; 
FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 
40. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, 
$35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $13,606; FY 77, $85,692; FY 78, $114,604; 
FY 79, $1,120; FY 80, $118,718; FY 81, $83,760; FY 82, $67,160; 
FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $67,850; FY 85, $5,149; and maintenance 
and operation of Dams costs: FY 79, $167,350; FY 80, $296; FY 
87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; 
FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; 
FY 95, $153,900. 
41. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 75, 
$47,000; FY 78, $40,400; FY 79, $22,000; FY 80, $25,000; FY 
81, $20,000; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; 
and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; 
FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; 
FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, 
$153,900. 
42. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, 
$13,741; FY 76 & 76T, $31,666; FY 77, $1,593; FY 78, $39,771; 
FY 79, $22,629; FY 80, $24,619; FY 81, $20,381; FY 82, $20,240; 
FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation 
of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; 
FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; 
FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 
6-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 6-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
July 25, 1912 
July 25, 1912 
August 8, 1917 
July 18, 1918 
January 21, 1927 
July 3, 1930 
March 4,19332 
June 26, 19343 
August 26, 1937 
August 26, 1937 
June 20, 1938 
June 20, 1938 
March 2, 1945 
June 30, 1948 
May 17, 1950 
May 17, 1950 
September 3, 1954 
November 29, 1963, 
Sec. 107 
July 14, 1960 
April 7, 1966, 
Sec. 107 
July 14, 1960 
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY 
BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS RIVER, 
FLA. (See Section 2 of text) 
Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. 
Purchase of canal. 
Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary 
of War, April 14, 1919: 
Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from 
"Alligator River-Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River- Pungo 
River route." Pamlico Sound-Neuse River section: Changed 
from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to 
"Goose Creek-Bay River route." 
Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting 
the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line 
approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. 
A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear 
River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock. 4 
An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to 
Winyah Bay, S. C. 
Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. 
Operating and care of works of improvements provided 
for with funds from War Department appropriations for 
rivers and harbors. 
Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 
feet wide. 
A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. 
A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, 
and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. 
A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to 
Inland Waterway. 
Six mooring basins. s 
A 12-foot channel in New River. 6, 11 
Vicinity of Fairfield - drainage. 
Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties 
at the inlet.7 
A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek8 
A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue 
Inlet gorge. 
An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence 
a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of 
Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks 
Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to 
Intracoastal Waterway. 
H.D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. 
H.D.589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. 
H.D. 1478,63d Cong., 3d sess. and 
H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess.' 
Approved by Secretary of War, 
May 15, 1919. 
H.D. 450,69th Cong., 1st sess. 
H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee, 
Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 16, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 1 
H.D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess.1 
H.D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' 
H.D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d sess. 1 
H.D. 421, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' 
H.D. 723, 80th Cong., 2d sess. 1 
H.D. 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' 
H.D. 379, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 1 
Detailed Project Report 
April 1963. 
Detailed Project Report 
July 1965 
6-24

WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 
TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
November 7, 1966 
November 7, 1966 
December 31, 1970 
October 22, 1976 
August 13, 1968 
February 18, 1982, 
Sec. 107 
July 14, 1960 
September 7, 1983, 
Sec. 107 
July 14, 1960 
November 17, 1986 
July 3, 1930 
October 17, 1940 
February 7, 1967, 
Sec. 107 
July 14, 1960 
August 30, 19359 
August 26, 1937 
March 2, 1945 
March 2, 1945 
Maintenance of a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet 
long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a 
basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina 
Beach. 
Maintenance of general navigation features of N.C. State 
Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. 
Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway 
bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken 
and Core Creek. 
Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full 
Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. 
Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro 
Inlet. 
An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through Carolina Beach 
Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway. 
An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide from the gorge in Bogue 
Inlet through the ocean bar. 
Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full 
Federal funding of Core Creek, Hobucken and Fairfield 
Bridges. 
SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 9 of text) 
Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from 
Pamlico Sound to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and 
training wall at entrance. 
Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, 
100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in 
entrance. 
Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake harbor; channels 12 
feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big Foot 
Slough Channels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance channel, 
same depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side 
of entrance channel. 
WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUNDAND 
BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 10 of text) 
A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to 
Beaufort Harbor via Wainright Channel. 
A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide to Atlantic. 
Channels, 7 feet deep, 75 feet wide, at east and west ends 
of Harkers Island and side channel 5 feet deep, 75 feet 
wide, with basin 150 by 130 feet, same depth, at Davis. 
A 7-foot side channel 75 feet wide, with basin 200 feet by 
500 feet, same depth, at Sealevel. 
H.D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' 
H.D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' 
H.D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. 
H.D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 
Approved by OCE Oct. 2, 1980 
Detailed Project Report 
June 1980 
Detailed Project Report 
May 1983 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. 
H.D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess.1 
Detailed Project Report 
July 9, 1965 
H.D. 485, 72d Cong., 2d sess.1 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 92, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' 
H.D. 99, 77th Cong., 1st sess.1 
S.D. 247, 77th Cong., 2d sess.' 
6-25

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
May 17, 1950 A 6-foot side channel 60 feet wide, with basin 100 feet by H.D. 68, 81st Cong., 1st sess.1 
about 600 feet, same depth, at Marshallberg. 
July 11, 1963, A side channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide to local harbor at Detailed Project Report 
Sec. 107 Cedar Island and an access channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet Dec. 12, 1962 
July 14, 1960 wide and about 400 feet long to a basin same depth, 60 by 
100 feet. 
September 22, 1967, An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, from Back Detailed Project Report 
Sec. 107 Sound to harbor of refuge 120 by 250 feet, same depth, at March 13, 1967 
July 14, 1960 west end of Harkers Island in Brook Creek. 
February 17, 1969, A channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide, from existing side Detailed Project Report 
Sec. 107 channel at Atlantic to a basin 600 by 180 feet, same depth, Dec. 21, 1967 
July 14, 1960 with a breakwater, between mouth of Little Port Brook 
and White Point. 
April 3, 1975, Deepening the existing 5-foot channel and basin at Davis Detailed Project Report 
Sec. 107 to 7 feet. Feb. 8, 1974 
July 14, 19601� 
1. Contains latest published maps. 
2. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. 
3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 
4. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape 
Fear River, deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of 
Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 
5. Deauthorized August 5, 1977, under authority of Sec. 
12, PL 93-251. 
6. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from 
Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, 
N.C. 
7. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 
8. A 6-foot by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, 
River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12-foot by 90-foot project 
deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, 
PL 99-662. 
9. Included in the Public Works Administration Program, 
Jan. 3, 1934. 
10. Deauthorized by the Chief of Engineers March 31, 1982. 
11. Deauthorized January 1, 1990, under authority of Sec. 
1001(b)(1), PL 99-662. 
6-26

WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 
TABLE 6-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Report for Construction Maintenance 
Aquatic Plant Control' 
(R & H Act of 1958 and 1962) 1969 70,664 
Atlantic Beach Channels, N. C. 1990 18,501 232,019 
Avon Harbor, N. C.' 1986 74,096 453,122 
Bay River, N. C.1 1950 44,382 49,627 
Beaufort Harbor, N.C.' 1994 852,040 4,154,591 
Belhaven Harbor, N. C.' 1989 126,687 376,401 
Black River, N.C. 1969 12,358 124,846 
Cashie River, N. C. 1950 40,403 15,905 
Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay 
with Cedar Bay, N. C.' 1975 69,610 25,615 
Channel from Back Sound to Lookout 
Bight, N.C.' 1994 88,328 2,929,895 
Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N. C.' 1975 42,029 6,415 
Chowan River, N. C. 1950 
Contentnea Creek, N. C.' 1941 64,395 32,247 
Edenton Harbor, N. C.' 1960 73,750 47,642 
Far Creek, N. C.' 1992 164,642 1,774,217 
Fishing Creek, N. C.' 1922 22,715 8,633 
Knobb's Creek, N. C.' ,2 19613 80,500 48,969 
Mackay Creek, N. C.' 19383 13,375 6,273 
Neuse River, N. C.' 1982 477,223' 338,209 
Newbegun Creek, N. C. 19283 4,802 247 
Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.1 1950 10,688 61,139 
Oracoke Inlet, N. C. 1991 346,240 946,110 
Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C.' 1993 674,651 1,069,205 
Pembroke Creek, N. C. 1976 60,000 
Perquimans River, N. C.' 19103 13,750 414 
Roanoke River, N.C.' 1994 404,584 626,009 
Scuppernong River, N. C.' 1950 81,164 87,282 
Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), N. C.' 1989 113,273 52,945 
Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.1 1950 8,507 18 
South River, N. C.' 1936 12,452 23,686 
Stumpy Point Bay, N. C.' 1993 268,381 1,400,266 
Swift Creek, N. C.' 1940 1,600 5,422 
Trent River, N. C.' 4 1968 115,199 143,579 
Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C. 1965 132,834 85,299 
Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. 1976 751,196 2,893,812 
Waterway Connecting Swanquarter 
Bay with Deep Bay, N.C. 1984 911,099 182,725 
Wrights Creek, N. C.' 1984 68,325 166,602 
1. Completed. 4. 8-foot modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, 
2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970); Meherrin under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 
River, N. C., transferred to Norfolk District. 5. Includes $1,959 refund to local interests on Dawson 
3. Report of Norfolk District. Creek, N. C. 
6-27

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 6-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to Septemmber 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Report For Construction Maintenance 
Fort Macon Park, N. C.1 1973 620,000 - 
1. Uncompleted portion of project was deauthorized 
November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 
6-28

WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 
TABLE 6-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Project 
Ararat River, Mount Airy, N. C.' 
Black River, Harnett County, N. C. 1 
Blackberry Creek, Henry Country, Va.' 
Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.1 
Brunswick County Beaches, N. C. 
(Cape Fear to North Carolina - 
South Carolina State Line)'o 
Conetoe Creek, N. C.' 
Contentnea Creek, N. C.' 
Core Creek, N. C.' 
Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plant, 
N.C.1 ' 
Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.' 
Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.' 
Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.' 
Filberts Creek, N. C.' 
Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C.' 9 
Gardners Creek, N. C.' 
Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N. C.' 
Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. 
Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.' 
Leesville, Va.' 
Leith's Creek, Scotland County, N. C." 
Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.' 
Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.' 
Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C. ',9 
Neuse River, Oriental, N. C. 
New River, N. C.' 
New River, Onslow County, N. C.' 
Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' 
Old Field Swamp, N. C.",9 
Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. 
Pasquotank River, N. C. 
Perquimans River, N. C.' 
Pungo Creek, N. C.' 
Pungo River, N. C.' 
Randleman Lake, N.C. 
Reddies River Lake, N. C."1 
Roaring River Lake, N. C." 
Simmons Bay, N. C.9 
South Creek, N. C.' 
Stuart, Va.' 
Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C.' 
Tar River, N. C. 
Tar River, N. C.' 
Tar River and tributaries, N. C.'1 
Tar River, Princeville, N. C. 
Trent River, N. C.' 
Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N. C. & S. C.",9 
White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender 
Counties, N.C.' 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual 
Report For 
1987 
1984 
1994 
1972 
1939-1943 & 
1976 
1960 
1958 
1965 
1989 
1984 
1963 
1971 
1970 
1969 
1972 
1985 
1984 
1984 
1989 
1982 
1974 
1978 
1979 
1992 
1950 & 1956 
1972 
1961 
1969 
1963 
1960 
1961 
1972 
1971 
1994 
1980 
1978 
1963 
1971 
1989 
1966 
1964 
1947 
1943 
1967 
1953 
1961 
1963 
Cost to September 30, 1995 
Construction 
4,901,854 
475,574 
22,870 
283,846 
Operation and 
Maintenance 
572,1144 
29,867 
50,889 
236,2238 
175,315 
394,055 
223,413 
138,1175 
37,7773 
374,005 
54,5977 
167,800 
50,430 
606,18912 
367,755 
430,951 
1,280,317 
113,657 
763,022 
370,446 
51,896 
580,977 
95,873 
86,600 
517,948 
80,931 
6,366 
582,270 
296,6022,3 
4,786,088 
985,800 
370,000 
186,435 
194,3676 
2,220,440 
611,096 
81,266 
18,624 
22,660 
390,249 
64,769 
67,821 
- 
623,687 
61,473 
214,286 
1. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under special 
continuing authority. 
2. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. 
3. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. 
4. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests. 
5. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. 
6. Includes $387 refund to local interests. 
6-29 
7. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 
8. Adjusted $3,000 to include preauthorization cost prior to 
FY 1960. 
9. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980. 
10. Reclassified to inactive category February 3, 1976. 
11. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1984. 
12. Includes $1,057 refund to local interests.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 6-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Report Date Funds Funds 
Project For Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Adkin Branch, N. C. 
AIWW - Mooring Basins 
AIWW - New River Onslow 
County, N. C. 
AIWW - Peltier Creek, N. C. 
12-foot project 
AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut 
Bodie Island, N. C. 
Brunswick County Beaches - 
Long Beach Portion, N. C. - Berm 
Cape Lookout, N. C. 
Conoho Creek, N. C. 
Contentnea Creek, N. C. 
Davis, N. C. 
Fort Macon State Park, 
N. C., Remaining Work 
Harbor of Refuge, N. C. 
Hominy Swamp, N. C. 
Howards Mill Lake, N.C. 
Hyde County Dike, N. C. 
MacKay Creek, N.C. 
Mann's Harbor, N. C. 
Mill Creek, N. C. 
Mocassin Swamp, N. C. 
Morehead City Harbor, N. C. 
Jetties at Beaufort Inlet 
Moyock Creek, N. C. 
Nahunta Swamp, N. C. 
Neuse River, N. C. 
Neuse River Barrier, N. C. 
Neuse River, 300 ft.-wide 
channel in front of New Bern, N. C. 
North River Dike, N. C. 
Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, N. C. 
Ocracoke Island, N. C. 
Roanoke River, 50 mile long 
Channel from Palmyra 
Landing to Weldon, N. C. 
Rockfish Creek, N. C. 
Scuppernong River, N. C. 
Six Runs Creek, N. C. 
Sweetwater Creek, N. C. 
Thoroughfare Swamp, N. C. 
Topsail Beach and 
Surf City, N. C. 
Tranters Creek, N. C. 
Trent River, Basins and 
Access Channels at New Bern, N. C. 
Wilmington Harbor Widening 
and Deepening, N. C. 
1982 
None 
1990 
None 
None 
None 
1990 
None 
1974 
1972 
1982 
1973 
1934 
1973 
1980 
None 
1976 
1973 
1973 
1973 
1986 
1973 
1973 
None 
None 
None 
None 
1986 
1975 
1983 
1976 
1987 
1971 
1973 
1976 
None 
1974 
None 
1990 
8 Sept. 812 
5 Aug. 771 
1 Jan. 906 
17 Nov. 865 
23 Sept. 861 
5 Aug. 771 
1 Jan. 906 
5 Aug. 771 
31 Mar. 78 2 
31 Mar. 783 
31 Mar. 824 
17 Nov. 865 
1 Nov. 811 
31 Mar. 782 
9 Jul. 958 
5 Aug. 771 
31 Mar. 782 
31 Mar. 784 
31 Mar. 782 
31 Mar. 782 
17 Nov. 865 
31 Mar. 782 
31 Mar. 782 
31 Mar. 784 
5 Aug. 771 
5 Aug. 771 
5 Aug. 771 
17 Nov. 865 
17 Nov. 865 
17 Nov. 865 
31 Mar. 782 
20 Apr. 882 
31 Mar. 782 
31 Mar. 782 
31 Mar. 782 
5 Aug. 771 
11 Jan. 852 
5 Aug. 771 
219,477 - 
79,782 
4,250 
25,419 
1,396,653 
107,472 
698,400 
130,900 
7,265 
116,395 
36,680 
64,416 
65,673 
30,911 
129,592 
157,721 
234, 032 
64,977 
64,584 
132,767 
139,339 
1 Jan. 906 
1. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 107 of the R&H 
2. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority Act of 1960, as amended. 
provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 205 of the 1948 FC Act, 5. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 
as amended. 6. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1001(bXl), PL 99- 
3. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority 662. 
provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood 7. Cost-to-date included in remaining authorized portion 
Control Act. of project (Engineering and Design only). 
4. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority 8. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1001(b)(2), PL 
99-662. 
6-30

WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 
TABLE 6-H 
Project 
RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS 
Date Survey Conducted 
Avon Harbor, N. C. 
Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C. 
Neuse River at New Bern, N.C. 
February 1995 
February 1995 
May 1995 
NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) 
TABLE 6-I 
Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost 
Crows Nest Channel, N. C. 6,099 
Harkers Island, Carteret County, N. C. 2,563 
Morehead Harbor, West Turning Basin Expansion, N. C. 69,262 
Styrons Creek, Carteret County, N. C. 2,140 
Tarklin Creek, Beaufort County, N.C. 4,900 
Whalehead Club, Corolla, N. C. 30,824 
Wilmington Harbor, N. C., Passing Lane 1 441 
1. Combined with Wilmington Harbor, Channel 
Widening, N. C., project. 
6-31 
---- 11~

TABLE 6-J DAMS AND RESERVOIRS 
See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated 
Section Project Name Nearest City River Above of Type Capacity Development Construe- Cost Lands Total 
in Text Mouth Dam (Pt) (acre-feet) (kilowatts) tion and Damages' 
13. Cape Fear B. Everett Jordan2 Moncure, N.C. 
River Basin, Howards Mill 
= 
4 Carthage, N.C. 
N.C. Randleman
2 Randleman, N.C. 
Small reservoirs 
20. Neuse River Falls
2 
Falls, N.C. 
Basin, N.C. Wilson Mills Wilson Mills, N.C. 
Beulahtown Kenly, N.C. 
Bakers Mills Princeton, N.C. 
Little Buffalo Kenly, N.C. 
Buckhorn Wilson, NC. 
Wiggins Mill Wilson, N.C. 
Stantonsburg Stantonsburg, N.C. 
Great Swamp Fremont, N.C. 
Black Creek Wilson, N.C. 
Aycock Swamp Fremont, N.C. 
Hilisboro Durham, N.C. 
Orange Durham, N.C. 
25. Yadkin River W Kerr Scott, N.C. Wilkesboro, N.C. 
Basin, N.C.& S.C. 
28. Roanoke River John H. Kerr, Va., and Boydton, Va. 
Basin, Va. and N.C.
2 
N.C. Philpott, Va.
2 
Bassett, Va. 
Gaston, Va. and N.C." Roanoke Rapids, N.C. 
Roanoke Rapids, N.C.' Roanoke Rapids, N.C. 
Smith Mountain, Va." Altavista, Va. 
SLeesville, Va." Altavista, Va. 
Taber, Va. Altavista, Va. 
Melrose, Va. Bookneal, Va. 
Randolph, Va. Chase City,Va. 
Stuart, Va. and N.C. Spray, NC 
Schoolfield, Va. and N.C. Danville, Va. 
Haw 4.3 
Deep 55.0 
Deep 85.0 
Various- 
Neuse- 
Neuse - 
Little- 
Little - 
Little Buffalo Creek - 
Contentnea Creek - 
Contentnea Creek - 
Tisnot Swamp - 
Great Swamp- 
Black Creek - 
Aycock Swamp - 
Eno - 
Little- 
Yadkin-Pee Dee 404.0 
Roanoke 
Roanoke 
Roanoke 
Roanoke 
Roanoke 
Roanoke 
Roanoke 
Roanoke 
Roanoke 
Roanoke 
Roanoke 
178.7 
336.2 
144.9 
137.0 
314.2 
293.7 
275.0 
262.9 
227.8 
297.2 
265.9 
112 E 
106 E 
110 E 
20 to 70 + E 
92 E 
81 CG,E 
50 E 
53 E 
51 E 
63 E 
42 E 
36 E 
39 E 
33 E 
37 E 
136 E 
107 E 
148 E 
753,500 
233,000 
108,000 
923,000 
374,450 
201,000 
81,000 
36,000 
13,000 
119,000 
35,000 
48,000 
18,000 
17,000 
7,000 
123,000 
57,000 
153,000 
89,186,000 58,414,000 147,600,00(0' 
18,874,000 14,726,000 33,600,00012 
62,300,000 61,700,000 124,000,000' 
- - 38,454,000 
91,334,000 91,666,000 183,000,000' 
- - 13,000,000 
- - 9,300,000 
- - 6,600,000 
- - 1,100,000 
- - 17,300,000 
- - 6,700,000 
- - 5,100,000 
- - 1,800,000 
- - 1,500,000 
- - 550,000 
- - 8,100,000 
- - 3,500,000 
5,749,343 3,360,657 9,110,000 
144 CG,E 2,808,000 204,000 67,529,000 24,521,000 92,050,000' 
220 CG" 
108 CG,E 
75 CG 
244 CG 
95 CG,E 
54 CG 
110 CG,E 
147 CG,E 
138 E 
126 CG,E 
249,800 
432,000 
59,300 
825,000 
76,900 
34,000 
120,000 
350,000 
163,000 
248,000 
14,000 
54,000 
83,000 
41,000 
20,000 
12,000 
43,000 
48,000 
15,000 
80,000 
13,933,000 
27,000,000 
31,300,000 
28,000,000 
9,100,000 
8,000,000 
17,700,000 
22,100,000 
9,000,000 
27,800,000 
1,157,000 15,090,000 
3,500,000 30,500,000 
800,000 32,100,000 
3,800,000 31,800,000 
1,000,000 10,100,000 
1,700,000 9,700,000 
6,000,000 23,700,000 
" 
4,700,000 26,800,000 
1,100,000 10,100,000 
6,400,000 36,000,000 
1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 
2. For details, see individual report. 
3. Includes $3,700,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the 
future by local interests and $44,000 cash contribution for construction of ranger security 
buildings. 
4. Includes $13,637,000 presently allocated to water supply and $21,595,000 recreation 
and fish and wildlife to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. 
5. Exclusive of transmission lines. 
6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 
7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949. Construction completed June 
1955 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 
8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. 
9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 
10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 
11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam constructed. 
12. Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 
13. Includes $74,058,000 presently allocated to water supply, $8,646,000 allocated to recreation 
and $8,296,000 to flood control to be paid by local intersts during construction. 
14. Deauthorized July 1995. 
Key 
E ............................ E arth 
CG ......................... Concrete-Gravity 
0
H
' 
Ixi 
CTJ 
0
0
Cg) 
(0

WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT 
FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, 
Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended 
(Preauthorization) 
TABLE 6-K 
Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost 
Adkin Branch, Kinston, N. C. 1,205 
Corolla (Whalehead Center), N. C.2 30,824 
Great Coharie Creek, N. C. 70,987 
Hominy Swamp, Wilson, N. C. 20,4721 
Little Rockfish Creek, N. C. 7,000 
Moravian Creek, Wilkesboro, N. C. 13,311 
Town Creek, Edgecombe County, N.C. 14,226 
Trent River, Jones County, N. C. 40,280 
West River Road Near Wabun, Roanoke County, Va. 10,048 
West Roanoke County, Va.2 10,045 
1. Includes $10,250 contributed funds. 
2. Section 14 project. 
3. Section 103 project. 
6-33

CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT* 
This district comprises all of South Carolina (except local 
watersheds draining into the Savannah River). It 
embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean 
between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except 
watersheds of Mackey and Skull Creeks, and excluding 
Hilton Head Island. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation 
1. Aquatic Plant Control, SC .............. 7-1 
2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between 
Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ....... .7-2 
3. Charleston Harbor, SC ................. .7-2 
4. Charleston Harbor Rediversion 
(Fish Lift), SC ........................ 7-3 
5. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC ...... 7-3 
6. Folly River, SC ....................... 7-4 
7. Georgetown Harbor, SC ................ 7-4 
8. Jeremy Creek, SC ..................... 7-5 
9. Little River Inlet, NC and SC ............. 7-5 
10. Murrells Inlet, SC ..................... 7-6 
11. Port Royal Harbor, SC ................. 7-6 
12. Shipyard River, SC .................... 7-6 
13. Town Creek, SC ...................... 7-7 
14. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ...... 7-7 
15. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....... 7-7 
16. Navigation Work Under Special 
Authorization ........................ 7-7 
Beach Erosion Control 
17. Folly Beach, SC ....................... 7-7 
18. Myrtle Beach, SC ..................... 7-8 
19. Battery Pringle, SC .................... 7-8 
20. Other Authorized Beach Erosion 
Control Projects ...................... 7-9 
21. Beach Erosion Work Under Special 
Authorization ........................ 7-9 
Flood Control 
22. Socastee Creek, SC .................... 7-9 
23. Pinopolis Dam, SC ..................... 7-9 
24. Santee Dam, SC ...................... 7-9 
25. Inspection of Completed Works .......... 7-10 
26. Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects ............................ 7-10 
Navigation 
1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC 
Location. The project includes all public waters in the 
State of South Carolina. 
27. Flood Control Work Under Special 
Authorization ....................... 7-10 
Shore Protection 
28. Streambank Erosion Under Special 
Authorization ....................... 
Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 
29. Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power.. 7-10 
Miscellaneous 
30. Project Modifications For Improvement of 
Environment .............. ......... 7-10 
General Investigations 
31. Active Investigations .................. 7-10 
Tables 
Table 7-A Cost and Financial Statement ........ 7-11 
Table 7-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 7-15 
Table 7-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .. 7-20 
Table 7-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion 
Control Projects ................. 7-20 
Table 7-E Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects ........................ 7-21 
Table 7-F Multiple Purpose Projects 
Including Power .................. 7-21 
Table 7-G Deauthorized Projects.............. 7-22 
Table 7-H Streambank Erosion Under Special 
Authorization ................... 7-22 
Table 7-I Active General Investigations ........ 7-23 
Table 7-J Flood Control Work Under Special 
Authorization ................... 7-24 
Table 7-K Inspection of Completed Works ...... 7-24 
*All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at 
the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in 
text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 
Existing Project. The project provides for the control 
of noxious aquatic plant growths from public waters in the 
combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, 
agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, and public health. 
7-1 
7-10

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Local Cooperation. Local interests must agree to 
hold the United States free from damages that may occur 
from operations performed in connection with this project 
and contribute 50 percent of the total cost. The South 
Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources 
Division, is designated as the State's lead agency for aquatic 
plant management and meets local interest requirements. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Aquatic plants now infest approximately 40,000 acres, with 
the worst infestations occurring in Lake Marion and Lake 
Moultrie. During FY 95, 19,042 acres of aquatic plants in 31 
water bodies were treated with herbicides. Grass carp 
(90,000) were purchased and stocked in Lake Moultrie to 
control aquatic plants in approximately 10,000 acres. 
The total cost of work performed in FY 95 was $1,477,677. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 
ongoing. Federal costs for the project to date have been 
$10,350,555 for new work. 
2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY 
BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND 
ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL 
(CHARLESTON DISTRICT) 
Location. The project starts near Little River at the 
North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends 
generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to 
Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 
miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 
miles. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 
11521, 11531, 11534, and 11535.) 
Previous projects. For further details see page 613 
of Annual Report for 1932. 
Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 
twelve feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch 
channel of the same dimensions to McClellanville and 
construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry 
County, South Carolina. (See table at end of chapter for acts 
authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at 
Georgetown, Charleston and Port Royal and numerous 
open-pile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products, 
fish, oysters, pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum 
products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along 
the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are 
available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and 
recreation requirements. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was 
performed a) by Eastern Dredging Company using a pipeline 
dredge in the AIWW from Charleston to St. Helena Sound 
during September 1994 - November 1994, removing 7,404 
cubic yards of material, at a cost of $5,258, (b) by Wright 
Dredging Company using a pipeline dredge in the AlWW 
during January 1995 - May 1995, removing 274,684 cubic 
yards of material, at a cost of $554,758, and (c) by Cottrell 
Engineering Corporation using a pipeline dredge in the 
AIWW from Winyah Bay to Charleston during August 1995 - 
September 1995, removing 90,000 cubic yards of material, at 
a cost of $446,475. Total contract costs were $1,006,491. 
The mosquito abatement control contract costs were $66,916. 
The cost of operating the Snagboat Snell in the Myrtle Beach 
Canal area during April 1995 - June 1995 was $312,351. 
Costs of $434,346 were incurred for contract dike 
maintenance. Condition and operation studies, natural 
resource management, project operations management, lands 
and damages, water control management, planning, 
engineering and design and supervision and administrative 
costs were $918,973. Federal costs for the project were 
$2,739,077. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project 
was completed in 1940; three bridges were completed in 
1936. Federal costs of existing project to date have been 
$7,345,888 for new work and $64,144,028 for maintenance, for 
a total of $71,489,916. 
3. CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC 
Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South 
Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the 
coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, SC, and 80 
miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See 
National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) 
Previous projects. For further details see page 425 of 
the Annual Report for 1962; page 1808 of the Annual Report 
for 1915; page 579 of the Annual Report for 1926; and page 
562 of the Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project. The project as authorized by the 
1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for 
deepening of the 35-foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the 
ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42-foot ocean 
contour to Goose Creek, a total distance of 27.1 miles, 
construction of one turning basin, modification of existing 
turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage 
basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, and deepening of 
the Wando River Channel to 40 feet. (See table at end of 
chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. 
7-2

CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT 
Terminal facilities. The SC State Ports Authority 
owns and operates four public terminals and a grain elevator 
in Charleston Harbor. These terminals offer more than two 
miles of berthing space, room enough for seventeen vessels 
at one time. The Ports Authority operates fifteen custombuilt 
container cranes and a variety of gantry and mobile 
cranes for breakbulk applications. On the land side, 
Charleston has extensive interstate and rail connections and 
is served by over 100 motor carriers. Modemrn facilities are 
also at wharves of seven major petroleum companies 
including storage tank farms. Modern facilities for marine 
repairs and servicing are available at Detyens Shipyard, 
located approximately ten miles northeast of Charleston on 
the Wando River. The Charleston Naval Complex 
Redevelopment Authority is currently marketing the former 
naval facilities to private industry and businesses. For further 
details see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: All new work is cost shared 75/25, 
Federal/non-Federal respectively. Accruals in FY 94 were 
overstated which resulted in adjustments to Federal costs for 
the project of $-17,753. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging 
was performed (a) by Southern Dredging Company using a 
pipeline dredge in the upper and lower harbor during 
September 1994 - February 1995, removing 624,595 cubic 
yards of material, at a cost of $574,843, and (b) by NATCO 
Limited Partnership using a hopper dredge in the entrance 
channel during December 1994 - March 1995, removing 
1,583,677 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $2,010,807. 
Accruals in FY 94 were overstated which resulted in 
adjustments to Federal costs for the project of $-4,997 which 
had been paid to Southern Dredging for work performed in 
Charleston Harbor in FY 94. Claim costs of $150,000 were 
paid to The M Operating Company for settlement relating to 
dredging conducted in FY 94. Total contract costs were 
$2,730,653. Costs to CEWES for maintenance of the tide 
gauge on Folly Beach were $131,317. The cost of operating 
the Snagboat Snell in the harbor during September 1995 was 
$201,040. Condition and operation studies, water control 
management, natural resource management, project 
operations management, lands and damages, planning, 
engineering and design, and construction management costs 
were $1,174,866. Federal costs for maintenance were 
$4,237,876. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. At the end of FY 
95, physical construction of the programmed work on the 40' 
project was 99% complete. Federal costs through FY 95 for 
the existing 40' project have been $37,119,770 (including 
PED) for new work and $121,765,142 for maintenance. 
4. CHARLESTON HARBOR 
REDIVERSION (FISH LIF'), SC 
Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and 
Berkeley Counties, SC, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 
at Charleston, SC. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 
11521 and 11524.) All works of improvement are in Berkeley 
County about 45 miles from Charleston, SC. 
Existing Project. The completed Cooper River, 
Charleston Harbor project (See Section 5) resulted in 
significant reduction in the transfer of blueback herring into 
the Santee Cooper Lakes. The landlocked striped bass 
fishery, a major tourist attraction, is dependent on these fish 
for forage. A model study, completed in March 1992 at 
CEWES, was conducted to determine how the turbine 
discharge could be prevented from overwhelming the 
attractant flow through the fish lift, plus testing various 
operational and structural modifications to determine how 
best to improve fish passage. Construction of Phase I was 
100% complete in FY 95. Phase II work will consist of 
installation of adjustable weirs and control equipment on the 
newly installed concrete walls. Construction will be 
completed by Oct 96. Phase IIB work will consist of 
installation of three 42 inch siphon pipes, intake structure 
and outfall structure to increase flow to attract fish. Phase 
IIB is scheduled for completion in 1997. Monitoring of the 
fish lift operation for two years after construction will be 
required to gather and analyze data to be used to refine the 
operation of the fish lift and to ensure its effectiveness. 
Total estimated cost of the project is $4,825,000, all Federal. 
(See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing 
project.) 
Local Cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Installation of a series of reinforced concrete walls (wing 
walls) was completed on 30 November 1994 by Brantley 
Construction Company, Inc. Contract costs were $366,150. 
Completion of Phase I produced the highest number of fish 
passage since completion of the dam in 1985. Costs to 
CEWES for model studies was $146,929. Costs for 
engineering and design, and construction management were 
$243,450 and $30,858, respectively. Federal costs for the 
project were $787,387. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. At the end of FY 95, 
construction of Phase I was 100% complete. Federal costs 
through FY 95 for the project have been $1,633,150. 
5. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON 
HARBOR, SC 
Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and 
Berkeley Counties, SC, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 
at Charleston (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 
and 11524.) 
Existing project. The major cause of the shoaling 
problem in Charleston Harbor was the diversion of fresh 
7-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the 
salt water of Charleston Harbor, which caused density 
currents which trapped sediments resulting in a phenomenal 
rate of deposition. The most practical solution of the shoaling 
problem was to redivert most of the Santee River waters 
above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River 
through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to 
the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South 
Carolina. The project for Cooper River, as authorized by the 
1968 River and Harbor Act, provided that the discharge 
through the existing Pinopolis Hydroplant be reduced to a 
flow which would not establish a density current in the 
harbor. This flow was estimated at 3,000 cubic feet per 
second (cfs) during the design phase of the project, but after 
operational tests this flow is estimated at 4,500 cfs. The 
excess water impounded in Lake Moultrie is being directed 
through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to 
enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake 
Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroelectric facility 
was constructed on the new canal at the edge of the swamp 
adjacent to the Santee River. This plant replaces those 
features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment 
of flows. The average flow of 11,000 cfs at the new 
powerplant, plus the 4,500 cfs average release planned for 
Pinopolis, approximates the historical average flow at 
Pinopolis. The three generators at the new plant are rated 
at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In 
the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the 
project includes a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and 
a relocated fish hatchery. (See table at end of chapter for 
acts authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Costs during FY 95 were $778 for contract 
administration. Maintenance: Funds of $5,096,380 were 
spent for maintenance of completed work. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was 
initiated March 1977. The power-on-line date was March 
1985. The power plant, channels and canals, and attendant 
work was completed in FY 85. The Corps has an open letter 
of credit with the SC Highway Department until they exercise 
option to initiate construction to widen the existing Highway 
52 bridge over the tailrace canal or until 28 May 2001. 
Federal costs for the existing project to date have been 
$196,888,562 for new work and $38,546,839 for maintenance, 
a total of $235,435,401. 
6. FOLLY RIVER, SC 
Location. The project begins in Folly River and Folly 
Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a 
southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National 
Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) 
Existing project. The project provides for an entrance 
channel, eleven feet deep by 100 feet wide extending from 
the Stono River one mile through the ocean bar; a channel 
within Folly River nine feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending 
three miles downstream from U. S. Highway 171 to the 
confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within 
Folly Creek nine feet deep by 80 feet wide extending three 
miles downstream from Highway 171 to the confluence with 
the Folly River. (See table at end of chapter for acts 
authorizing existing project.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: None. Maintenance: The government-owned 
sidecaster dredge Fry removed 25,783 cubic yards of material 
at a cost of $404,238 during May 1995 - June 1995. 
Condition and operations studies, planning, engineering and 
design and supervision and administrative costs were $42,776. 
Federal costs for the project were $447,014. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing 
project was completed in FY 79. Federal costs for the 
existing project to date have been $337,736 for new work and 
$3,900,249 for maintenance, a total of $4,237,985. 
7. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC 
Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South 
Carolina 50 miles northeast of Charleston Harbor and 90 
miles southwest of the entrance to Cape Fear River, North 
Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532) 
Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 
of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report for 
1938; and page 442 of Annual Report for 1944. 
Existing project. The authorizations provide for a 
channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 
feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin 
at the U. S. Highway 17 bridge over Sampit River, with a 
side channel 2,400 feet long and not less than 200 feet wide 
leading to a turning basin at the upper end of the built-up 
portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The 
project also provides for the continued maintenance to a 
depth of 18 feet and a width of 400 feet for the bypassed 
portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. 
(See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing 
project.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of 
Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one 
500 foot concrete pier with creosote-timber fenders and one 
700 foot concrete and steel bulkhead, both of which are 
7-4

CHARIESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTLRCT 
backed up by 25 acres of paved area. Since 1984 
approximately $8.5 million has been spent on structures and 
improvements by the SC State Ports Authority and private 
interests. Other than the 700 foot bulkhead, recent 
improvements include a 43,000 foot warehouse, salt dome, 
cement dome, three lumber sheds, plus acquisition of ten 
additional acres of land. For further details, see Port Series 
No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was 
performed by Southern Dredging in the Sampit River and 
Upper Winyah Bay by pipeline dredge during May 1995 - 
September 1995, removing 1,024,150 cubic yards of material, 
at a cost of $1,254,000. Costs of $-45,597 and -3,469 cubic 
yards of material reflects adjustments made to earnings for 
work performed in FY 94 by Southern Dredging Company. 
Contract dike maintenance costs were $978,833. Water 
control management, natural resource management, 
condition and operation studies, project operations 
management, easement acquisition, planning, engineering and 
design and supervision and administrative costs were 
$677,614. Applied a credit of -$16,230 for funds received for 
disposal area user fees. Federal costs for the project were 
$2,848,620. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing 
project was completed in 1951. The jetties were completed 
in 1903 - 1904. Federal costs for the existing project to date 
have been $4,615,903 for new work and $67,173,681 for 
maintenance, a total of $71,789,584. 
8. JEREMY CREEK, SC 
Location. Jeremy Creek is located at McClellanville, 
SC approximately 40 miles northeast of Charleston and 20 
miles southwest of Georgetown. (See National Ocean Survey 
Charts Nos. 11531 and 11518.) 
Existing project. The project provides for a turning 
basin twelve feet deep and 150 feet in diameter at the head 
of the previously existing Jeremy Creek navigation channel. 
The dredging of Jeremy Creek or "Side Channel to 
McClellanville" was authorized as a part of the channel from 
Charleston to McClellanville (or part of what is now the 
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway) by the River and Harbor Act 
of 2 March 1907. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. There are three shrimping 
facilities, one oyster packing shed, a crabbing operation, two 
icehouses, three fuel docks and a public launching ramp 
located on Jeremy Creek. The commercial facilities are 
privately owned, but are considered adequate for present and 
near future commerce. There are areas along the east bluff 
shore available for the expansion of existing facilities or the 
construction of new ones. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was 
performed by Wright Dredging Company in Jeremy Creek 
and the vicinity of McClellanville by pipeline dredge during 
January 1995 - March 1995, removing 5,200 cubic yards of 
material, at a cost of $10,160. Project operations, planning, 
engineering and design and supervision and administrative 
costs were $6,348. Federal costs for the project were 
$16,508. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Federal costs of 
existing project to date have been $49,987 for new work and 
$116,158 for maintenance, a total of $166,145. 
9. LIT'LE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC 
Location. The project is located near the North 
Carolina-South Carolina state line. Little River enters the 
Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and 
affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from 
Shallotte, N. C. to Georgetown, S. C. (See National Ocean 
Survey Chart No. 11535.) 
Existing project. The project provides for an entrance 
channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence 
a ten by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway. The entrance channel is stabilized by jetties 
extending seaward 3,284 feet and 3,830 feet long on the east 
and west sides of the inlet, respectively. 
The current project was authorized by the Water 
Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the 
authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, 
P.L. 79-14. 
Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. 
Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, 
numerous private docks, and several public boat ramps 
located in or near Little River. It is expected that existing 
facilities will expand and new ones will be added as demands 
for services exceed current capacity. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: None. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies, 
water control management, and supervision and 
administrative costs were $41,293. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 
completed in FY 84. Federal costs for the existing project 
have been $17,037,428 for new work and $2,920,238 for 
maintenance, a total of $19,957,666. 
7-5

EPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
10. MURRELLS INLET, SC 
Location. The project is located on the coast of 
South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles 
southwest of the City of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the 
ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal 
streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. 
(See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) 
Existing project. The project provides for an 
entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward 
bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin 
at the old Army crashboat dock. The entrance channel is 
stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 
3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, 
respectively. The recreational project includes a walkway on 
the south jetty with access road and parking area. The 
current project was authorized by the Water Resources Act 
of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. 
Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. 
Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and 
numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet 
Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. 
Facilities are expected to be expanded and new ones added 
as demands for services outstrip capacity. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New Work: None. Maintenance: Condition and operations 
studies, water control management costs, mapping, and 
supervision and administrative costs were $76,641. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing 
project was completed in 1981. Federal costs for the existing 
project to date have been $15,502,240 for new work and 
$3,901,441 for maintenance, a total of $19,403,681. 
11. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC 
Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South 
Carolina 57 miles southwest of Charleston Harbor and 23 
miles northeast of the mouth of the Savannah River. (See 
National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11516.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
a channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port 
Royal, South Carolina, 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across 
the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 
12.7 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort 
River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and 
including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide 
opposite the wharf of the South Carolina State Ports 
Authority. (See the table at the end of the chapter for acts 
authorizing the existing project.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities include one 565 foot 
concrete wharf and one 50 ton gantry crane. Since the late 
1980's improvements to the port facilities consist of two large 
cargo tanks for storage of clay, a freezer for exports, 
additional warehouse space and the dock has been 
reinforced. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was 
performed by Weeks Marine, Inc. in Battery Creek and the 
turning basin by clamshell dredge during September 1995, 
removing 144,734 cubic yards of material at a cost of 
$417,230. Condition and operation studies, water control 
management, project operations, natural resource 
management, planning, engineering and design, and 
supervision and administration costs were $164,379. Federal 
costs for the project were $581,609. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing 
project was completed in 1959. Federal costs for the existing 
project to date have been $1,786,100 for new work and 
$12,347,424 for maintenance, a total of $14,133,524. 
12. SHIPYARD RIVER, SC 
Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of 
Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about 
one-half mile below the U. S. Naval Base, whence it flows 
southerly about one and one-half miles and empties into the 
Cooper River, about three-fourths miles above Drum Island. 
(See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11524.) 
Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of 
Annual Report for 1932 and page 463 of Annual Report for 
1944.
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
a channel 30 feet deep from Cooper River to MacAlloy 
Corporation's plant, including two turning basins, one 
opposite Chevron USA Products Company and another at 
the upper end of the project. (See table at end of chapter 
for acts authorizing existing project.) The 1986 Water 
Resources Development Act authorized deepening to 38 feet 
and enlarging the lower turning basin to 1000 ft. as part of 
the Charleston Harbor, SC improvement. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Located in the lower 
three-quarters of a mile of the channel are wharves operated 
by the Chevron USA Products Company and the Shipyard 
River Coal Terminal Company. These wharves 
accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling 
petroleum products, coal and miscellaneous dry bulk 
materials. Located mid-channel are Salmons Dredging 
7-6

CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT 
Corporation, Detyens Shipyard, and Pre-Stress Concrete 
Company. Situated in the upper channel is MacAlloy 
Corporation's wharf used for handling ores. For further 
details see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was 
performed by Southern Dredging Company using a pipeline 
dredge during September 1994 - February 1995, removing 
208,775 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $226,373. Costs 
of $4,997 to Southern Dredging reflect adjustments made to 
earnings for work performed in FY 94. Water control 
management, project operations management, planning, 
engineering and design and supervision and administrative 
costs were $58,007. Federal costs for the project were 
$289,377. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing 
project was completed in 1951. New work dredging was 
accomplished in 1989 under the Charleston Harbor, SC 
improvement. The entrance channel and a portion of the 
lower turning basin have been deepened to 38 feet. Cost for 
that work is reflected in the cost for the Charleston Harbor 
improvement. Federal costs under the existing project to 
date have been $487,824 for new work and $10,451,165 for 
maintenance for a total of $10,938,989. 
13. TOWN CREEK, SC 
Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW 
directly south of the Town of McClellanville in Charleston 
County, SC. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a 
southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National 
Ocean Survey Chart No. 11531.) 
Existing project. The project provides a channel ten 
feet deep by 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of 
Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The project 
includes an entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet 
wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. (See table 
at end of the chapter for acts authorizing existing projects.) 
Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was 
performed by the government-owned sidecaster dredge 
Schweizer during May 1995 - June 1995, removing 41,189 
cubic yards of material, at a cost of $645,847. Condition and 
operations studies, water control management, project 
operations, natural resource management, planning, 
engineering and design and supervision and administrative 
costs were $46,474. Federal costs for the project were 
$692,321. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing 
project was completed in 1975. Federal costs under the 
existing project to date have been $219,521 for new work and 
$6,529,774 for maintenance, a total of $6,749,295. 
14. RECONNAISSANCE AND 
CONDITION SURVEYS 
Costs of $11,017 were incurred for a survey of the Ashley 
River conducted during April 1995; and $378 for the Edisto 
River, for a total of $11,395. 
15. OTHER AUTHORIZED 
NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(See Table 7-C.) 
16. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 
86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). 
Fiscal year costs for Beaufort - AIWW, SC, $100; 
Calabash Creek, NC, $49,946. 
Snagging and Clearing for Navigation (Section 3, Public 
Law 79-14.) 
No costs incurred. 
Beach Erosion 
17. FOLLY BEACH, SC 
Location. The municipality of Folly Beach, SC is 
located along the Atlantic shoreline of Folly Island, 
approximately 12 miles south of the City of Charleston, SC. 
Folly Island is the second island south of the Charleston 
Harbor entrance channel. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 
No. 11521.) 
Existing project. The plan of improvement provided 
for protection from a 5-year storm event and placed about 
2.48 million cubic yards of sand over a total project reach of 
28,200 feet of beach. The project has an initial berm with a 
top width of 15 feet at an elevation of 9.0 feet above the 
national geodetic vertical datum. Nine groins constructed of 
wooden piles, timbers, and large rocks which extend 
perpendicular into the surf for an average distance of 
approximately 250 linear feet were rehabilitated. The 
rehabilitated groins were built of steel sheet pile with a 
concrete cap and tied into only the wooden sections of 
existing groins which are deemed salvageable. Mean tidal 
range is 2.8 feet. 
Periodic nourishment is required approximately every eight 
years with a total volume of 1.74 million cubic yards each 
cycle. Estimated cost (October 1992 price levels) of initial 
7-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
construction is $14,290,000 Federal and $2,522,000 non- 
Federal for a total of $16,812,000. Estimated cost of periodic 
nourishment is $84,399,000 Federal and $14,893,000 non- 
Federal for a total project cost of $116,104,000. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full 
on pg 7-8 of the FY 1994 Annual Report. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Federal share of contract costs were $278,049. Review of 
local sponsor acquisitions, engineering and design and 
construction management costs were $1,151, $58,411 and 
$15,731, respectively. Sponsor's credit for LERRD's was 
$359,981. Federal costs for the project were $353,342. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The initial 
construction was completed in 1993. Federal costs for the 
existing project to date have been $10,553,765 (including 
PED). 
18. MYRTLE BEACH, SC 
Location. Myrtle Beach is located along the northern 
coast of SC. The area is commonly referred to as the Grand 
Strand. The Grand Strand extends from Little River Inlet at 
the NC border, in a southerly direction, to Murrells Inlet, SC 
for a total distance of approximately 37 miles. This project 
includes the developed area along the coast of Horry County, 
SC and a portion of the coastal area of Georgetown County, 
SC. Major municipalities in the project area include the 
cities of Myrtle Beach and North Myrtle Beach, Garden City, 
and the Town of Surfside Beach. 
Existing project. The plan of improvement would 
place about 5.1 million cubic yards of sand over a total 
project reach of 25.4 miles of beach encompassing three 
separable reaches. This material will come from offshore 
borrow sites. Periodic nourishment will be required once 
every 8 to 10 years throughout the project life of 50 years. 
All work is programmed. Estimated cost (October 1995 
price levels) of initial construction is $35,188,000 Federal and 
$18,947,000 non-Federal for a total of $54,135,000. 
Estimated cost of periodic nourishment is $105,347,000 
Federal and $56,725,000 non-Federal for a total project cost 
of $216,207,000. The non-Federal sponsors on Reach 1 and 
Reach 2 are acquiring necessary real estate easements. 
Initial beach nourishment is scheduled for both reaches in 
the summer and fall of 1996. Reach 3 initial construction is 
scheduled for the spring and summer of 1997. 
Local cooperation. This project has three non-Federal 
sponsors, one for each reach. The non-Federal sponsor for 
Reach 1 is the City of North Myrtle Beach. The non-Federal 
sponsor for Reach 2 is the City of Myrtle Beach. Reach 3 
lies within the jurisdictional boundaries of Georgetown 
County, Horry County, and the Town of Surfside Beach. 
Horry County has agreed to be the non-Federal sponsor for 
Reach 3; they entered into a separate agreement with 
Georgetown County and the Town of Surfside Beach for the 
cost sharing of their respective portions. Local interests must 
contribute 35 percent of the costs allocated to hurricane and 
storm damage reduction, and bear all costs of operation, 
maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of 
hurricane and storm damage reduction facilities; provide 
lands, easements, rights of way, and borrow and excavated or 
dredged material disposal areas; and modify or relocate 
utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities, where necessary 
for the construction of the project. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Review of local sponsor acquisitions, engineering and design 
and construction management costs were $38,497, $261,747, 
and $187,687, respectively. Federal costs for the project were 
$487,931. 
Condition at end of Fiscal Year. Federal costs 
through FY 95 for the existing project have been $3,153,931 
(including PED). 
19. BATTERY PRINGLE, SC 
Location. Battery Pringle is located along the Stono 
River on James Island, SC. 
Existing project. Battery Pringle is a Civil War 
earthen fortification constructed along the Stono River by 
Confederate forces in 1863. It is listed on the National 
Register of Historic Places and is widely considered to be 
one of the most well preserved earthen mound fortifications 
of the Civil War era. The west rampart is experiencing 
erosion from the Stono River at the estimated rate of 1.3 feet 
per year. The plan of improvement consists of a 24-inch 
thick layer of graded riprap placed on a 9-inch prepared 
gravel bed and a layer of geotextile filter fabric. Prior to 
placement of the riprap and bedding material, compacted fill 
will be placed against the existing bank to provide a sloped 
surface of 1 foot vertical to 2 feet horizontal. The riprap 
revetment will be 253 feet in length and extend from 
elevation 5.0 feet NGVD to elevation 0.0 feet NGVD. 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required to 
provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations, 
and alterations required for construction and future 
maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States 
free from damages due to the construction works, except 
damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States 
or its contractors; provide during the period of construction, 
a cash contribution of 5 percent of the total project costs; if 
the value of allowable contributions represents less than 25 
percent of the total project costs, the local project sponsor 
shall provide, during the period of construction, an additional 
cash contribution in the amount necessary to make its total 
contribution equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; 
and operate and maintain the project after completion in 
7-8

CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of 
Army. The non-Federal partner is the Charleston Soil and 
Water Conservation District. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. The 
construction contract was awarded on 19 July 1995 to Tri 
State Consultants of Greensboro, NC. Contractor mobilized 
on 5 September 1995 and physical construction began on 18 
September 1995. Total contract payments were $20,000. 
Federal share of contract costs was $13,000. Engineering and 
design and construction management costs in FY 95 were 
$11,184 and $4,695, respectively. Federal costs for the 
project were $28,879. 
Condition at end of Fiscal Year. Federal costs 
through FY 95 for the existing project have been $28,879 for 
new work. 
20. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH 
EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Table 7-D.) 
21. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Beach Erosion Control Activities Pursuant to Section 
103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) consisted of 
Arcadian Shores, SC, $61,867; Litchfield Beach, SC, $39; and 
39th Avenue North, N. Myrtle Beach, SC, $19,684. 
Flood Control 
22. SOCASTEE CREEK, SC 
Location. Socastee Creek is a small coastal stream 
located 5 miles inland and adjacent to Myrtle Beach, Horry 
County, SC. The creek originates in Big Bay Swamp and 
flows in a southwesterly direction for approximately eight 
miles to its confluence with the Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway (AIWW). The total drainage area of the creek 
above the AIWW is 22.5 square miles. 
Existing project. The plan of improvement consisted 
of clearing and enlarging approximately 2.1 miles of the 
existing creek channel with the inclusion of two low flow 
weirs to protect the quality of the existing natural 
environment. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full 
on page 7-8 of FY 1992 Annual Report. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. No 
expenditures in FY 95. The project was accepted by the 
sponsor on 21 April 1995. 
Condition at end of Fiscal Year. The existing 
project was completed in 1993. Federal costs through FY 95 
for the existing project have been $1,093,710 for new work. 
23. PINOPOLIS DAM, SC 
Location. The Pinopolis Dam is on Lake Moultrie, 
SC, which is located approximately 30 miles north of 
Charleston, SC. 
Existing project. The existing embankment erosion 
protection at the Pinopolis Dam experienced erosion and 
riprap washout during the winter storm of March 1993, 
leaving the original porous concrete facing of the 
embankments exposed at many locations. The facing was 
generally cracked and had been undermined and broken in 
some locations. The recommended plan consisted of 
placement of riprap along approximately 2,061 linear feet of 
dam. Of this amount, 1,976 linear feet was placed along the 
East Dam and 85 linear feet placed along the West Dam. A 
12-inch bedding layer with a maximum stone size of five 
inches was placed for a distance of 1,200 linear feet along the 
East Dam only. No bedding material was required for the 
West Dam because existing bedding material at this location 
conformed to required standards. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described in 
full on page 7-9 of FY 1994 Annual Report. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. The 
construction contract was awarded on 22 July 1994 to Walco, 
Inc., of Robbinsville, NC. Contractor mobilized on 4 
October 1994. Final inspection was conducted on 20 January 
1995; project was accepted by the sponsor on 22 June 1995. 
Total contract payments were $499,723. Federal share of 
contract costs was $362,439. Fish and wildlife studies, real 
estate activity, engineering and design and construction 
management costs were $43,046. Total Federal costs for FY 
95 were $405,485. 
Condition at end of Fiscal Year. The existing 
project was completed in 1995. Federal costs through FY 95 
for the existing project have been $435,787. 
24. SANTEE DAM, SC 
Location. The Santee Dam is located on Lake 
Marion, SC, which is approximately 40 miles north-northwest 
of Charleston, SC. 
Existing project. The existing embankment erosion 
protection at the Santee Dam experienced erosion and riprap 
washout during the winter storm of March 1993, leaving the 
original porous concrete facing of the embankments exposed 
at many locations. This facing was generally cracked and 
showed signs of fatigue. The project consisted of placement 
of riprap on the upstream face of the dam. Approximately 
7-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIViTIES FOR FY 1995 
2,688 linear feet of riprap was placed along the Santee North 
Dam and 115 linear feet of riprap was placed along the 
Santee South Dam. A 12" bedding layer with a maximum 
stone size of 8" in diameter was placed for a distance of 2,576 
linear feet along the North Dam. Approximately 115 linear 
feet of 6" thick bedding material was placed on the South 
Dam. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described in 
full on page 7-9 of FY 1994 Annual Report. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. The 
construction contract was awarded on 22 July 1994 to Walco, 
Inc., of Robbinsville, NC. Contractor mobilized on 4 
October 1994. Final inspection was conducted on 20 January 
1995; project was accepted by the sponsor on 22 June 1995. 
Total contract payments were $495,145. Federal share of 
contract costs was $371,359. Fish and wildlife studies, 
engineering and design and construction management costs 
were $10,972. Total Federal costs for FY 95 were $382,331. 
Condition at end of Fiscal Year. The existing 
project was completed in 1995. Federal costs through FY 95 
for the existing project have been $417,855. 
25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
WORKS 
Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts 
require local interests to maintain and operate local 
protection projects after completion in accordance with 
regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections 
were made to determine extent of compliance and 
responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in 
maintenance and operation on local flood protection works 
when appropriate. Cost for the period was $25,014. For 
project inspection data see Table 7-K. 
26. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Table 7-E.) 
27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public 
Law 80-858, as amended (Preauthorization). 
(See Table 7-J) 
Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood 
Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 84-99, and 
Antecedent Legislation). 
Federal costs for FY 95 were $200,828 for Flood Control 
and Coastal Emergencies and $122,800 for the National 
Emergency Preparedness Program. 
Emergency Work for Others. 
No costs were incurred in FY 95. 
28. STREAMBANK EROSION UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 
Activities Pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 as 
amended (Preauthorization). 
Fiscal year costs were Charlestowne Landing, SC, $63; 
Middleton Place - Levee, SC, $48; 39th Avenue North, 
Myrtle Beach, SC, $2,696; 48th Avenue South Bridge, Myrtle 
Beach, SC, $3,857; Battery Pringle, James Island, SC, 
$14,389; Indian Bluff Park, Eutawville, SC, $21,387; SC DOT 
Bridges, SC, $20,203; and Shore Drive, Singleton Swash, 
Myrtle Beach, SC, $46,003. 
(See Table 7-H for previous projects in this category.) 
Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and 
Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public 
Law 83-780. 
No costs were incurred in FY 95. 
29. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS 
INCLUDING POWER 
(See Table 7-F.) 
Miscellaneous 
30. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR 
IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT 
Project modifications accomplished under the authority 
of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, 
as amended. 
Fiscal year costs were Murphy Island, Santee Wildlife 
Refuge, SC, $36,348; Initial Appraisal Reports, $9,435; and 
Coordination Account, $2,588. 
General Investigations 
31. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS 
See Table 7-I which covers: Surveys, Collections, and 
Study of Basic Data, and Research and Development 
Activities. 
7-10

TABLE 7-A 
CHARIEISON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Sect 
in Total Cost to 
Teat Project Fundiag FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept. 30, 1995 
1 Aquatic Plant 
Control, SC 
(Contributed Funds) 
2 Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway 
Between Norfolk, 
Va. and the St. 
Johns River, FL 
3 Charleston Harbor, 
SC 
(Contributed Funds) 
4 Charleston Harbor 
Rediversion (Fish 
Lift), SC 
5 Cooper River, 
Charleston Harbor, 
SC 
6 Folly River, SC 
7 Georgetown Harbor, 
SC 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
1,060,000 
1,078,222
00 
0
0 
1,054,000 
1,046,144
00 
1,695,000 
1,500,186
00 
1,270,000 
1,477,677
0
0 
0
0 
0
0 
10,351,605 
10,350,555 
52,028 
52,028 
7,455,378 
7,455,378 
2,764,000 1,976,982 3,167,000 2,888,000 64,513,668 
3,059,744 1,967,937 3,069,567 2,739,077 64,213,450 
9,051,000 -107,000 2,145,000 -360,000 47,301,564 
9,586,388 326,413 1,903,437 -17,753 47,285,334 
3,984,000 3,511,689 3,291,000 4,177,000 122,227,118 
3,990,871 3,251,269 3,564,696 4,237,876 122,167,731 
3,215,000 250,000 
3,195,463 442,963 
250,000 
213,182
0 
163 
50,000 
86,206
0 
3,491 
530,000 
541,134 
0 12,425,000 
-5,956 12,363,211 
575,000 950,000 1,825,000 
546,375 787,387 1,633,150 
0 
10,159 
0 198,681,191 
778 196,888,562 
2,692,000 4,112,054 4,072,000 4,978,000 38,663,513 
2,455,864 4,214,687 4,074,487 5,096,380 38,546,839 
0
0 
266,000 
267,158 
0
0 
46,292 
47,108
0
0 
0
0 
337,736 
337,736 
275,000 446,000 3,914,999 
259,236 447,014 3,900,249 
00 
00
7,061,755 
7,061,755 
2,261,000 3,327,721 3,286,000 2,828,000 67,362,638 
2,259,120 3,338,568 3,241,437 2,848,620 67,288,237 
7-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Sect. 
in Total Cost to 
Test Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept. 30, 1995 
8 Jeremy Creek, SC 
9 Little River Inlet, 
NC and SC 
(Contributed Funds) 
10 Murrells Inlet, SC 
(Contributed Funds) 
11 Port Royal Harbor, 
SC 
12 Shipyard River, SC 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
00 
12,000 
12,839
0
0 
71,000 
80,840
00 
00 
70,000 
76,925
0
0
0
0 
1,625,000 
1,632,268
00 
1,000 
844 
0
0 
1,000 
1,463 
00 
42,638 
46,268
0. 
0
0
0 
62,554 
65,821 
16,500 
16,508 
00 
52,000 
44,305
0
0
0
0 
56,000 
46,746 
0 
852
00 
49,987 
49,987 
116,175 
116,158 
17,037,428 
17,037,428 
39,000 2,925,640 
41,293 2,920,238 
1,521,920 
1,521,920 
15,502,240 
15,502,240 
90,000 3,991,054 
76,641 3,968,441 
00 
00 
1,536,893 
1,536,893 
1,786,100 
1,786,100 
55,483 717,000 581,500 12,348,643 
56,184 723,532 581,609 12,347,424 
00 
33,000 340,342 
29,523 347,803 
0
0 
491,974 
491,974 
37,000 290,000 10,458,554 
30,901 289,377 10,451,165 
7-12

TABLE 7-A 
CHARIFS'IDN, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Sect. 
in Total Cost to 
Text Project Fuding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept. 30, 1995 
13 Town Creek, SC 
(Contributed Funds) 
17 Folly Beach, SC 
(Contributed Funds) 
18 Myrtle Beach, SC 
(Contributed Funds) 
19 Battery Pringle, SC 
(Contributed Funds) 
22 Socastee Creek, SC 
(Contributed Funds) 
23 Pinopolis Dam, SC 
(Contributed Funds) 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
00 
444,000 
436,368
00 
00 
00 
00
219,521 
219,521 
528,246 504,000 679,989 6,535,286 
529,316 499,231 692,321 6,529,774 
0
0 
300,000 8,744,000 
219,709 7,713,298 
00 
00 
00 
00 
00 
741,000 
261,296
0 
53,931 
00 
0 
681,418 
0
0 
8,600 
8,600 
0 10,630,000 
353,342 10,553,765 
1,300,000 100,000 -225,000 1,175,000 
1,288,750 101,712 -273,721 1,116,742 
00 
00 
150,000 
641,755 
50,000 
176,610 
85,700 
73,114 
24,600 
22,248 
625,000 3,291,000 
487,931 3,153,931 
5,000
0 
76,900 
28,879 
54,000 
7,000 
9
9 
10 
10 
11 
11 
5,000
0 
76,900 
28,879 
54,000 
7,000 
-10,000 1,099,700 
0 1,093,710 
0 261,600 
0 255,101 
31,500 410,000 
30,302 405,485 
00
139,000 
3,075 
0 
135,925 
441,500 
435,787 
139,000 
139,000 
7-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Sect. 
sn Total Cost to 
Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept. 30, 1995 
24 Santee Dam, SC New Work: 
Approp. 0 0 62,500 360,500 423,000 
Cost 0 0 35,524 382,331 417,855 
(Contributed Funds) New Work: 
Approp. 0 0 147,000 0 147,000 
Cost 0 0 4,583 135,061 139,644 
1 Includes $109,490 for new work for previous 
projects. 
2 Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous 
projects. 
3 Includes $10,165,564 for previous projects and 
$752,000 for Preconstruction, Engineering and 
Design. 
4 Includes $401,989 for maintenance of previous 
projects and $600 for maintenance expended from 
contributed funds for the existing project. 
5 Includes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. 
6 Includes $114,556 for maintenance of previous projects. 
7 Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P.L. 79-11 incurred 
through FY 73. 
8 Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 
9 Includes $1,586,000 for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design. 
10 Excludes $752,761 credit for LERRD's. 
11 Includes $2,666,000 for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design. 
7-14

CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See 
Sect. 
in Dae of Project and Work 
Text Authriing Act Authorized Documents 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Sep. 19, 1890 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Mar. 3, 1925 
Mar. 3, 1925 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 19351 
Aug. 30, 1935 2 
Aug. 30, 1935 2 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jun. 18, 1878 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Jul. 18, 1918 
Jan. 21, 1927 
1. H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 
P.L. 89-298 
AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC 
Provides for control and progressive eradication of 
water hyacinth, alligatorweed Eurasian 
water-milfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant 
growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, 
connecting channels, and other allied waters of the 
U.S., in combined interest of navigation, flood 
control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife 
conservation, public health and related purposes 
including continued research for development of 
most effective and economic control measures in 
cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. 
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY 
BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS 
RIVER, FL 
Channel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bay. 
Channel from Charleston to a point opposite 
McClellanville. 
Branch channel to McClellanville. 
Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence 
through the Esterville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. 
Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. 
Widening and deepening the waterway from 
Charleston to Beaufort. 
A waterway eight feet deep and 75 feet wide from 
Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay. 
Construction of bridges across the waterway in 
Horry County, SC. 
Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers. 
Enlarging the channel from Winyah Bay to 
Charleston including the branch channel to 
McClellanville, to depth of ten feet and bottom 
width of 90 feet. 
Increasing dimensions of waterway to twelve 
feet deep and 90 feet wide. 
Anchorage Basin 125 feet wide, 335 feet long, 
twelve feet deep, near Myrtle Beach, SC. 
(Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) 
CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC 
2 jetties. s 
Increase in depth to 30 feet with width of 500 feet 
between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. 
The 40-foot channel to the Naval Base. 
Act provided that the 40-foot channel should not be 
undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at 
this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water 
over the blocks, has been authorized." This dock 
was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act 
approved July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. L. 725). 
A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via 
Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel 
through Town Creek for commercial purposes. 
The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be 
prosecuted only as found necessary for national 
defense. 
Annual Report 1878, pp. 
553-572. 
H.D. 288, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. 
H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2nd sess, 
pt.1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58, and 64-68. 
H.D. 249, 69th Cong. 1st sess. 
7-15 
TABLE 7-B 
Annual Report, 1889, p. 1184. 
H.D. 84, 56th Cong., 1st sess. 
and Annual Report 1900, p.1 90 8 
Annual Report 1903, p. 1133 
H.D. 178, 63rd Cong., 1st. sess. 
H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. 
S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. 
H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 14, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. 
H.D. 129, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 11, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee, 
Doc 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 
H.D. 327, 76th Con., 1st sess. 
2.

REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See 
Sect. 
nll Date o Project and Work 
Text Authoriing Act Anthorised Documents 
Oct. 17, 1940 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Jul. 14, 1960 
as amended 
Oct. 22, 1976 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Aug. 13, 1968 
Aug. 17, 1991 
Aug. 13, 1968 
Jul. 14, 1960 
as amended 
Aug. 5, 1886 
The 35-foot channel depth from the sea to the head 
of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, 
also a channel in Shem Creek to Mount Pleasant, 
110 feet wide and ten feet deep, including a turning 
basin at the upper end. 
An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area 
between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. 6 
(Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) 
Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum 
Island to 35 feet. 
Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 
1,150 feet upstream and downstream from 
mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. 
Project authorized for the Phase I design 
memorandum stage of Advanced Engineering and 
DDeeseipgenn. ing 35 foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the 
ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42 foot 
ocean contour to Goose Creek: a distance of 27.1 
miles construction of one turmning basin, modification 
of existing turning basins, deepemng and 
modification of the anchorage basin, deepening 
Shipyard River to 38 feet, mamntain the Wando River 
Channel to 35 feet at Federal expense and the 
deepening of this channel to 40 feet if economically 
justified. 
CHARLESTON HARBOR REDIVERSION 
(FISH LIFT), SC 
See Cooper River Charleston Harbor. 
Modify the fish lift at the Cooper River, Charleston 
Harbor, SC (Rediversion Project) and monitor 
operation of the fish lift for two years following such 
modifications. 
COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC 
(ST. STEPHEN PROJECT) 
Redivert most of the Santee River waters Pinopolis 
Dam into the lower Santee River through a canal 
beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the 
Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South 
Carolina. 
FOLLY RIVER, SC 
Consists of stable all-tide channel nine feet deep and 
80 feet wide in Folly River and Folly Creek and an 
entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and 
eleven feet deep. 
GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC 
Jetties and earthen dike to protect 
south jetty. 
H.D. 259, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 
H.D. 156, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 
S.D. 136, 83rd Cong., 2nd 
sess. 
H.D. 35, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 
H.D. 94-436, 94th Cong., 2nd 
sess. 
99th Cong. 2nd sess., 
P.L. 96-662 
S.D. 88, 90th Cong.,P.L. 90-483 
P.L. 102-104 
S.D. 88, 90th Cong.,P.L. 90-483 
Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers, Dec. 23, 1977. 
H. Ex. Doc. 258 48th Cong., 
2nd sess., and Annual 
Report 1885, pp. 1154-1170, 
andH. Ex. Doc. 117 50th 
Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual 
Report 1889, pp. 1110-1111. 
7-16 
4. 
6. 
7.

CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT 
TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See 
Sect. 
in Date of PqJectd ad Work 
Text Authoriz dg Act Authorimed D r. 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jun. 30, 1948 
Jul. 14, 1960 
as amended 
Mar 2. 1945 
Auth. by Senate 
Public Works 
Comm. and the 
House Public 
Works Comm. 
on Oct. 12, 1972, 
under auth. of 
Sec. 201, P.L. 
89-298, 1965 FC 
Act. 
Mar. 7, 1974 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Auth. by the 
House Comm. on 
Public Works on 
Nov. 10, 1971, 
and the Senate 
Comm. on Public 
Works on Nov 18, 
1971, under auth. 
of Sec. 201, 
P.L. 89-298, 1965 
FC Act. 
Mar. 7, 1974 
Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. 
27-foot channel from ocean, including a turning basin 
in Sampit River. 
Cutoff and side channel in Sampit River. 
JEREMY CREEK, SC 
To provide a turning basin twelve feet deep and 150 
feet in diameter at the head of the previously existing 
Jeremy Creek. 
LITTLE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC 
Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 
feet across the ocean bar; thence ten feet by 90-foot 
inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. 
Authorized emergency dredging operations as the 
Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain 
channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe 
movement of vessels until such time as the 
authorized project is constructed. 
MURRELLS INLET, SC 
Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 
feet across the seaward bar, thence ten by 90-foot 
inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army 
crash boat dock. 
Authorized emergency dredging operations as the 
Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain 
channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe 
movement of vessels until such time as the 
authorized project is constructed. 
H.D. 398, 58th Cong., 2nd 
sess. and Annual Report 
1904, pp. 1591-1605. 
H.D. 211, 76th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H.D. 21, 81st Cong., 1st 
sess. 
Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers, Jan. 11, 1982. 
Sec. 3, P.L. 79-14 
H.D. 362, 92nd Cong. 
H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd 
sess., P.L. 93-251 
Sec. 3, P.L. 79-14 
H.D. 137, 92nd Cong. 
H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd 
sess., P.L. 93-251 
7-17 
9. 
10.

REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See 
Sect. 
In Date o Prqject and Work 
Text Authori ing Act Authorized Documents 
11. Sep. 3, 1954 
12. Jul. 25, 1912 
Mar. 3, 1925 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 26, 1937 2 
Mar. 2, 1945 
13. Jul. 14, 1960 
as amended 
17. Nov. 17, 1986 
Aug. 17, 1991 
18. Nov. 28, 1990 
19. Jul. 24, 1946 
22. Jun. 30, 1948 
PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC 
A channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound 
to Port Royal, SC.; 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide 
across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for 
approximately 12.7 miles thence 24 feet deep and 300 
feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for 
approximately 83 miles to and indcluding a turning 
basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite wharf 
of the SC State Ports Authority. 
SHIPYARD RIVER, SC 
Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet. 
Deepening of channel to 18 feet from deep water in 
Cooper River upstream 1-1/16 miles. 
Channel depths of twelve to twenty feet. 
28-feet from Cooper River to Gulf Oil Corp's 
terminal, and the deepening of the channel above 
that point to twenty feet from the depth of twelve 
feet previously authorized without local cooperation. 
Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and 
a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp's 
terminal, with a turning basin 30 feet deep at the 
latter point. 
Extension of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity 
of the Pittsburgh Metallurgical Co. Plant, with a 
turning basin at the upper end. 
TOWN CREEK, SC 
An entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet 
wide across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles 
and a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from 
the mouth of Five Fathom Creek to the Atlantic 
Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 6.2 miles. 
FOLLY BEACH, SC 
Shoreline protection. 
Construct hurricane and storm protection measures. 
MYRTLE BEACH, SC 
Storm damage reduction for period nourishment 
over the 50-year life of the project. 
BATTERY PRINGLE, SC 
Provide shoreline and streambank erosion 
protection to Battery Pringle. 
SOCASTEE CREEK, SC 
Clearing and enlarging approximately 2.1 miles of 
the existing creek channel with the inclusion of two 
low flow weirs. 
H.D. 469, 81st Cong., 2nd 
sess. 
S.D. 350, 62nd Cong., 2nd 
sess. 
H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
Rivers & Harbors Committee 
Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. 
Rivers & Harbors Committee 
Doc. 43, 73th Cong., 2nd sess. 
Rivers & Harbors Committee 
Doc. 38, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 
H.D. 93, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 
Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers, Feb. 12, 1974. 
P.L. 99-662 
99th Cong., 2nd sess. 
P.L. 102-104, 102nd Cong. 
P.L. 101-640, 101st Cong. 
Sec. 14, P.L. 526. Authorized 
by Chief of Engineers, 
Mar. 15, 1995. 
Sec. 205 P.L. 858. Authorized 
by Chiel of Engineers, 
Apr. 26, 1989. 
7-18

TABLE 7-B 
CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See 
Sect. 
In Date of Prqlect and Work 
Teat Authorizing Act Authorized Documents 
PINOPOLIS DAM, SC 
23. Jul. 24, 1946 Prevent streambank erosion at selected locations Sec. 14, P.L. 526. Authorized 
along the upstream face of the Pinopolis Dam, to by Chief of Engineers, 
include areas on the East Dam and West Dam. Jun. 15, 1994. 
SANTEE DAM, SC 
24. Jul. 24, 1946 Prevent streambank erosion at selected locations Sec. 14, P.L. 526. Authorized 
along the upstream face of the Santee Dam, to by Chief of Engineers, 
include areas on the North Dam and South Dam. Jun. 15, 1994. 
1/Included in Public Works Administration 
Program September 6, 1933. 
2/Included in Emergency Relief Administration 
Program May 28, 1935. 
3/ Contains latest published maps. 
4/ Inactive. 
5/ Completed under previous projects. 
6/ For national defense. 
7-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 7-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(See Section 15 of Text) 
For Last Full 
Report See Cost to Sep. 30, 1995 
Annual Report Oeratio & 
Project Status For Construction intenance 
Adams Creek, SC Completed 1978 $125,697 $29,143 
Aquatic Plant Control, NC and SC 1 Completed 1968 379,680 -- 
Archers Creek, SC Completed 1914 20,646 -- 
Ashley River, SC Completed 1955 260,996 589,436 
Brookgreen Gardens, SC Completed 1992 94,700 3,994 
Edisto River, SC Completed 1938 33,103 2,887 
Great Pee Dee River, SC Completed 1950 183,712 271,098 
Mingo Creek, SC Completed 1950 29,050 8,575 
Lynches River and Clark Creek, SC Completed 1982 9,500 85,595 
Salkahatchie River, SC Completed 1896 15,841 1,936 
Santee River NC & SC Completed 1950 99,750 182,469 
Village Creef SC Completed 1985 26,500 111,314 
Waccamaw River, NC and SC Completed 1978 262,814 284,347 
Wateree River, SC Completed 1940 60,000 154,559 
1 Pilot Program 
2 Excludes $7,800 contributed funds 
OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH 
TABLE 7-D EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 20 of the Text) 
For last Full 
Report See Cost to Sep. 30, 1995 
Annual Report Operation & 
Project Status For Construction Maintenance 
Hunting Island Beach, SC Completed 1984 $2,872,717 1-- 
1 Excludes $1,249,336 contributed funds 
7-20

CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT 
TABLE 7-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Sectimon 26 of Text) 
For Last 
Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1995 
See Annual Operation & 
Project Status Report for Coastruction Maintenance 
Buck Creek, NC 7 SC 1 Completed 1970 $298,167 -- 
Cow Castle Creek, SC 1 Completed 1985 250,000 -- 
Cowpen Swamp, SC1 Completed 1960 18,679 -- 
Crabtree Swamp, SC 1 Completed 1969 97,000 -- 
Eagle Creek, SC Completed 1986 1,245,063 -- 
Edisto River, SC Discontinued 1947 6,379 -- 
Edisto River, North Fork, SC S Completed 1969 127,660 -- 
Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing,SC Completed 1958 3,160 -- 
Gapway Swamp, SC Completed 1969 339,197 -- 
Kingstree Branch. Williamsburg County, SC 1 Completed 1978 247,242 -- 
Leith CreeNk,C 1 Completed 1982 430,951 -- 
Little Sugar Creek, NC 1 2 Completed 1969 86,600 -- 
Old Field Swamp, NC123Completed 1979 763,022 -- 
Reddies River Lake, NC 3 Completed 1980 985,800 -- 
Reedy River, SC 1 Discontinued 1974 4,500 -- 
RoaringRiver, Wilkes County, NC 1 3 Phase I Only 1978 370,000 -- 
Saluda River, SC" Completed 1963 99,000 -- 
Sawmill Branch, QC Completed 1971 248,605 -- 
Scotts Creek, SC Completed 1988 545,000 -- 
Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter Co., SC 1 Completed 1971 77,400 -- 
Simmons Bay Creek NC Completed 1963 186,435 -- 
Simpson Creek, SC Completed 1957 81,000 -- 
Todd Swamp, SC Completed 1964 29,000 -- 
Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC 2 Completed 1974 319,669 -- 
Waccamaw R. & Seven Creeks, NC & SC 1 2 Completed 1961 67,821 -- 
Wilson Branch, Sumter County, SC 1 Completed 1985 277,111 -- 
1 Authorized by Chief of Engineers 
2 Transferred to Wilmington District in 1980 
3 Transferred to Wilmington District in 1984 
MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS 
TABLE 7-F INCLUDING POWER 
(See Section 29 of the Text) 
For Last 
Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1995 
See AnnualO& 
Project Status Report for Construction tenance 
Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC Completed 1992 $29,400,000- 
1 Excludes $770,000 for credits to Santee Cooper 
7-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVTIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 7-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last Full 
Report See Date Federal Contributed 
Amnumal Report and Funds Funds 
Project for Authority Expended Expended 
Abbapoola Creek, SC -- 5 Aug 77 -- 
Section 12, 
P.L. 93-251 
Beresford Creek, SC -- 5 Aug 77 ---- 
Section 12, 
P.L. 93-251 
Charleston Hbr (Anchorage Basin), SC 1954 17 Nov 86 $1,330,000-- 
Section 1002, 
P.L. 99-662 
Congaree River, SC -- 5 Aug 77 ---- 
Section 12, 
P.L. 93-251 
Little Pee Dee River, SC -- 5 Aug 77 ---- 
Section 12, 
P.L. 93-251 
Lumber River, SC & NC -- 5 Aug 77 ---- 
Section 12, 
P.L. 93-251 
Myrtle Beach (Anchorage Basin), SC 1954 17 Nov 86 ---- 
Section 1002, 
P.L. 99-662 
Reedy River, Greenville, SC 1971 17 Nov 86 4,500-- 
Section 1002, 
P.L. 99-662 
Russell Creek, SC -- 5 Aug 77 ---- 
Section 12, 
P.L. 93-251 
STEAMBANK EROSION 
TABLE 7-H UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
(See Section 28 of the Text) 
For last 
Faull Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1995 
See Amal & 
Prject Status Report for Construction tene 
Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC Completed 1987 $185,000 1 -- 
Drayton Hall, SC Completed 1994 $187,800 -- 
1 Previous reports included $26,100 in study costs. Actual construction costs were $185,000. 
7-22

CHARIESThN, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT 
ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
(See Seedim 31 of Test) 
IrEM 
SURVEYS (CATEGORY 100) 
NAVIGATION STUDIES (CATEGORY 110) 
Charleston Harbor Deepening/Widening 
FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 120) 
Charleston Storm Damage Reduction 
SPECIAL STUDIES (CATEGORY 140) 
Environmental Services Partnerships 
Pocotaligo River and Swamp, SC 
MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES (CATEGORY 170) 
Special Investigations 
FERC Licensing Activities 
Interagency Water Resources Development 
North American Waterfowl 
National Marine Fisheries 
COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES (CATEGORY 180) 
Cooperation With Other Water Resource Agencies 
Planning Assistance to States 
SC-Basic HEC-2 Workshop 
FISCAL YEAR COSTS 
$ 487,345 
263,954 
30,729 
145,418 
$ 43,462 
3,000 
20,000 
2,133 
8,038 
4,900 
2,000 
5,271 
TOTAL (CATEGORY 100) $1,016,249 
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (CATEGORY 200) 
FLOOD PLAIN MGMT SERVICES (CATEGORY 250) 
HYDROLOGIC STUDIES (CATEGORY 260) 
Hydrologic Studies 
ADVANCE ENGINEERING & DESIGN (CATEGORY 600) 
Myrtle Beach, SC 
TOTAL (CATEGORY 200) 
TOTAL (CATEGORY 600) 
TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
$ 219,035 
5,000 
$ 224,035 
43,752 
$ 43,752 
$1,284,036 
7-23 
TABLE 7-I

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 7-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
(See Section 27 of Text) 
Study Identification Section Fiscal Year Costs 
Camden Creek, Kershaw County, SC 205 $ 9,150 
Eagle Creek, Dorchester County, SC 205 26 
Hanahan Water Treatment Plant, Charleston County, SC 205 16 
Hillside Drainage, Myrtle Beach, SC 205 14,565 
Lawson Fork Branch, Spartanburg, SC 205 21,159 
Plum Island Waste Water Treatment Plant, Charleston County, SC 205 1,487 
Sanders Branch & Crook Creek, Hampton, SC 205 9,871 
Sellers Branch, Sellers, SC 205 29,710 
Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC 205 43,767 
TABLE 7-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS 
(See Section 25 of Text) 
Project Date of Inspection 
Cow Castle Creek, SC March 1995 
Eagle Creek, SC March 1995 
Drayton Hall, SC February 1995 
Kingstree Branch, SC February 1995 
Pompion Hill February 1995 
Sawmill Branch, SC March 1995 
Scotts Creek, SC March 1995 
Turkey Creek, SC February 1995 
Wilson Branch, SC February 1995 
7-24

SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT *
The District comprises drainage basins that flow into the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, SC, 
and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL, and includes the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between these 
points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah river in southwestern North Carolina, eastern 
Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation 
1. Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee 
Rivers .................... 8-2 
2. Aquatic Plant Control ........ 8-2 
3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 
Between Norfolk, VA, and St. Johns 
River, FL (Savannah District) ... 8-3 
4. Brunswick Harbor, GA ....... 8-3 
5. Savannah Harbor, GA ........ 8-4 
6. Savannah River Below 
Augusta, GA .............. 8-6 
7. Reconnaissance and Condition 
Surveys ................. 8-6 
8. Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects ................. 8-6 
9. Navigation Work Under Special 
Authorization .............. 8-6 
Beach Erosion Control 
10. Beach Erosion Control Work Under 
Special Authorization ........ 8-7 
11. Tybee Island, GA ........... 8-7 
Flood Control 
12. Oates Creek, Richmond County, G18-8 
13. Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects ............ 8-8 
14. Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects . ................. 8-8 
15. Flood Control Work Under Special 
Authorization .............. 8-8 
Emergency Streambank and Shoreline 
Protection 
16. Emergency Stream bank and Shoreline 
Protection Under Special 
Authorization .............. 8-8 
Project Modifications for Improvement of 
Environment 
17. Project Modifications for Improvement 
of Environment Under Special 
Authorization .............. 8-9 
18. Lower Savannah River ....... 8-9 
Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 
19. Savannah River Basin, GA and 
SC ..................... 8-9 
19A. J. Storm Thurmond Dam and Lake, 
GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill 
Lake, GA and SC) ......... 8-9 
19B. Hartwell Dam and Lake, GA 
and SC ................. 8-10 
19C. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, 
GA and SC (Formerly Trotters 
Shoals Lake, GA and SC) . . . . 8-10 
20. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee 
River Basin, GA and FL ...... 8-11 
General Investigations 
21. Planning Assistance to States 8-12 
22. Surveys ................. 8-12 
23. Collection and Study of Basic 
Data 8-12 
24. Research and Development . . . 8-12 
Miscellaneous 
25. Flood Control and Coastal 
Emergency ............... 8-12 
26. National Emergency 
Preparedness ............. 8-12 
27. Regulatory Functions ........ 8-12 
Tables 
Table 8-A Cost and Financial 
Statement ........... 8-13 
Table 8-B Authorizing Legislation .. 8-16 
Table 8-C Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects ............ 8-22 
Table 8-D Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects ........ 8-23 
Table 8-E Savannah River Basin, GA 
and SC Dams and Lakes . 8-24 
8-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Navigation 
1. ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND OCMULGEE 
RIVERS, GA 
Location. These rivers are entirely within the 
State of Georgia. (See National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration Survey Map of 
Georgia, formerly U.S. Geological Survey Map 
of Georgia.) For a full description of these 
rivers, see page 636, Annual Report for 1932. 
Previous projects. Prior projects for the Altamaha 
River have been adopted, and expenditures 
made under them, by the River and Harbor Acts 
of March 3, 1881, and September 19, 1890; 
for the Oconee River by the River and Harbor 
Acts of June 18, 1878, September 19, 1890, 
and March 3, 1905; for the Ocmulgee River, by 
the River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876, 
and September 19, 1890. 
For Further Details, see page 1815, Annual 
Report for 1915, and page 589, Annual Report 
for 1938. 
Existing project. This project covers the entire 
Altamaha River (including a channel between 
the river and Darien, GA), a length of 137 miles. 
The lower 139 miles of the Oconee River has a 
mean tidal range of 6.4 feet at its mouth which 
gradually decreases to mile 33, where there is 
no perceptible tidal effect. At Doctortown, mile 
59, ordinary floods attain a height of about 10 
feet above low water, and at extreme floods, a 
height of about 15 feet above low water. 
On the Oconee River at Dublin the ordinary 
fluctuations attain a height of 22 feet, and the 
extreme fluctuations a height of 32 feet above 
low water. On the Ocmulgee River at Macon 
the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 15 
feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 
25 feet above low water. There is no approved 
estimated cost for improvement or for maintenance. 
Published maps of these rivers are in the following 
documents: Altamaha River, HED 282, 51st 
Cong., 2d sess., Oconee River, HED 211, 51st 
Cong., 1st sess., Ocmulgee River, HED 215, 
51st Cong., 1st sess., and Lower Altamaha 
River and Darien Harbor, GA, HD 610, 77th 
Cong., 2d sess. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing 
Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Along these rivers there are 
numerous natural shore landings which are 
considered ample for existing commerce. Facilities 
for recreational boats have been constructed 
at several points. 
Operations and results during FY. Maintenance: 
There were no maintenance costs this FY. 
Condition at end of FY. The existing project is 
such that the percentage of completion cannot 
be stated. Channel depths have been increased 
by excavating rock shoals and sandbars, by constructing 
contraction and bank-protection 
works, and by closing cutoffs. Navigation has 
been rendered safer by removing obstructions. 
Many of the closing dams and contractions and 
bank-protection works need repairs. The notice 
of availability on the Final Environmental Impact 
Statement appeared in the Federal Register 
October 21, 1977. 
2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL 
Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, 
connecting channels, and other allied waters in 
Savannah District. 
Existing project. The project provides for control 
of water-hyacinth, lyngbya, alligator weed, 
Eurasian water milfoil, and other noxious aquatic 
plants from navigable waters, tributary steams, 
connecting channels, and other allied waters of 
the United States, in the combined interests of 
navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, 
fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and 
related purposes. The project provides for 
continued research for developing the most 
effective and economic control measures in 
cooperation with other Federal and State agencies 
in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, 
H. S. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. The 
authorizing act provides that research costs 
shall be borne fully by the United States. (See 
Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
The Final Environmental Impact Statement was 
filed with EPA on August 6, 1979, and its 
notice of availability appeared in the Federal 
Register August 17, 1979. (See Table 8-A for 
Cost and Financial Statement.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must agree 
to hold the United States free from damages 
that may occur from operations performed in 
connection with this project and participate to 
the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the 
8-2

SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 
planning and actual control operations of the 
program. Requirements are being met. 
Operations and results during FY. The Georgia 
Game and Fish Division, Department of Natural 
Resources, who maintain surveillance of potential 
aquatic plant problem areas, reported nuisance 
aquatic plant infestation in Lakes Juliette, 
Oliver, Jackson, Blackshear, Worth, and in 
Ebenezer Creek. Also in Little Ocmulgee and 
George L. Smith State Parks. Total projects 
cost of the FY-95 program was $160,796 of 
which the portion contributed by the Federal 
government was $80,398. FY-95 treatments 
include introduction of biological control agents 
and chemical applications. 
3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY 
BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND THE ST. JOHNS 
RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) 
Location. This 161-miles section of waterway 
connects Port Royal Sound, SC, with Cumberland 
Sound, GA and FL. (See NOAA charts 
11489-11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic 
Survey Charts 838-841, inclusive.) 
Previous project. (Between Savannah, GA, and 
Fernandina, FL) For details see pages 1814, 
1821-1823 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 
585 of Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project. The project provides for a 
waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and 
not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal 
Sound, SC, and Savannah, GA; 12 feet deep at 
mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land 
cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open 
waters between Savannah, GA, and Cumberland 
Sound, GA and FL; and a suitable anchorage 
basin at Isle of Hope, GA. Mean tidal range 
between Port Royal, SC, and Cumberland 
Sound, GA and FL is from 6 to 8 feet with 
fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet due to winds 
and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing 
Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Exclusive or adequate terminal 
facilities at port of entry, this improvement 
serves numerous wharves, some of which are 
open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are 
considered ample for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during FY. 
Maintenance: The District used Cottrell Engineering 
Company to dredge the waterway 
during FY-95. They removed 2,029,522 cubic 
yards of material at a cost of $1,707,618. 
Condition at end of FY. The main channel of 
the existing project, completed in 1941, is maintained 
at 12 feet. The former main channel, 
now an alternate route through the westerly end 
of the south channel and northerly end of 
Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth 
of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north 
and south of Savannah Harbor. Relocation of 
the main channel from the Frederica to Mackay 
Rivers near St. Simons Island, GA, was accomplished 
under Section 107 of the Continuing 
Authorities Program after construction of a new 
bridge for the Torras Causeway. The notice on 
the final Environmental Impact Statement appeared 
in the Federal Register October 29, 
1976. Total expenditures for the FY are 
$2,342,397 (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial 
Statement.) 
4. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA 
Location. The harbor entrance is 70 statute 
miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, 
GA, and 25 statute miles north of the entrance 
to Fernandina Harbor, FL. (See NOAA Chart 
11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey 
Chart 447.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1818 of 
Annual Report for 1915 and page 591 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. The project provides for a 
stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to 
East River and the following channels: 32 feet 
deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet 
deep and 400 feet wide through St. Simons 
Sound, Brunswick River, and East River to the 
foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 
feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical 
Company wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining 
Company; 30 feet deep and 400 feet in South 
Brunswick River; 30 feet deep and 400 feet 
wide in East River from Second Avenue to its 
confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep 
and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to 
the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry 
Creek 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. 
Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and 
a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 
feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately 
above the wharf of the former Glynn Canning 
Company. All depths refer to mean low water. 
8-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at the 
City of Brunswick 7.3, and 7.6 feet at the upper 
end of the harbor. For further details see Annual 
Report for 1962. 
Local cooperation. Complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. Eighteen wharves and piers, 
almost all privately owned, have a berthing 
space of 7,530 linear feet. The Port of Brunswick 
and the State of Georgia have a transit 
shed and modem docks with 1,640 feet of 
berthing space (three general cargo berths) on 
East River. For further details see Port Series 
No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1990). 
Operations and results during FY. 
Maintenance: The District used Southern 
Dredging Company to dredge the East River 
during the first quarter of the FY. Their dredge, 
the "Cherokee", removed a total of 506,742 
cubic yards of material at a total cost of $582,- 
918. The District used NATCO Limited Partnership 
during the first quarter in FY-95 to dredge 
the Bar Channel using Dredges "Dodge Island" 
and "Ouachita". The dredges removed 426,768 
cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,620,302. 
The District prepared plans and specifications 
for the FY-96 Brunswick Entrance Channel 
contract. 
Total operation and maintenance cost amounted 
to $3,175,711 for FY-95. (See Table 8-A for 
Cost and Financial Statement.) 
Condition at end of FY. The existing project 
was completed in December 1960. General 
condition of the harbor works is satisfactory, 
providing maintenance dredging continues. The 
notice on the Final Environmental Impact statement 
appeared in the Federal Register October 
3, 1975. Authorized depths were maintained 
throughout the FY. 
Costs for existing completed project thru September 
30, 1995, were $87,691,381 of which 
$135,398 was for new work and $3,175,711 
was for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost 
and Financial Statement.) 
Feasibility Study: Savannah District is preparing 
and negotiating a Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement 
(FCSA) with the Georgia Ports Authority 
to determine the feasibility of deepening the 
harbor to 34 feet. 
5. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA 
Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles 
south of Charleston, SC, and 70 miles north of 
Brunswick Harbor, GA. (See NOAA Chart 
11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey 
Chart 440.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1810 of 
Annual Report for 1915 and page 578 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. The project provides for a 
channel 44 feet deep and 600 feet wide across 
the ocean bar about 7.0 miles long; 42 feet 
deep and 500 feet wide to the vicinity of Garden 
City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal) and 
36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity 
of the Savannah Sugar Refinery of Savannah 
Foods and Industries, Inc., about 22.6 miles; 
and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 
1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway 
Bridge, about 1.5 miles, a total length of 31.1 
miles; Fig Island and Marsh Island Turning 
Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 
feet long in the vicinity of the Seaboard Coast 
Line terminal, and American Oil Company terminal; 
Kings island Turning Basin 42 feet deep by 
1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the 
vicinity of the Garden City terminal of the Georgia 
Ports Authority; Argyle Island and Port 
Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 
feet long near Savannah Refinery terminal and 
at the extreme upper limit of the project near 
the Continental Can Company terminal; and a 
1,200 foot long by 1,050 foot wide by 40 foot 
deep Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the 
vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority's LASH 
facility. The project also provides for sediment 
control works consisting of a tide gate structure 
across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet 
deep, 600 feet wide; about 2 miles long, with 
an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 
300 feet wide; a drainage canal across Argyle 
Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control 
works and canals for supplying fresh water to 
the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and 
facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved 
areas other than refuge lands. Mean 
range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the 
harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme 
ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7 feet, respectively. 
The tide gate structure across Back River was 
taken out of operation as of March 1991 to decrease 
salinity levels in the wildlife refuge. The 
8-4

SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 
drainage canal across Argyle Island, which was 
part of the original tide gate project, was closed 
as of April 1992 by the New Cut closure contract 
done by a Section 1135 program. The 
cost of this contract was $1,531,847. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must provide 
suitable disposal areas and retaining dikes for 
construction and future maintenance of the 
project. The Chatham County Board of Commissioners, 
as local assurers, have met all 
requirements to date. 
Terminal facilities. Sixty-one piers and wharves 
adequately serve existing waterborne commerce 
of the port. These facilities, with use of dolphins, 
have a combined berthing space of 
46,930 linear feet at mean low water. Included 
in the berthing space are six container berths 
with 271 acres of handling area. All have 
railway and highway connections. LASH facilities 
are located at the entrance to the harbor 
and have depth ranging up to 38 feet mean low 
water. The berthing space of LASH facilities is 
included in the above combined berthing space. 
For further details, see Port Series No. 14, 
Corps of Engineers (revised 1982) and Annual 
Report for 1990. 
Savannah Harbor Widening. The Savannah 
Harbor Widening project was awarded on 28 
September 1990 for $7,735,512. The scope of 
work included widening of 5.6 miles of channel 
from 400-500 feet with 1.8 million cubic yards 
of material dredged after demolition and removal 
of structures in the riverbank. Chatham County, 
the local assurer, completed real estate acquisition 
prior to award expending $3,688,000 in 
providing LERRD's as required by the LCA. 
Construction was completed on April 10, 1992. 
Significant difficulty was experienced by the 
contractor in removing debris and obstructions, 
the quantity of which was only partially quantified 
before construction. Six additional parcels 
of real estate had to be acquired during the 
project due to greater than anticipated amounts 
of bank sloughing. One parcel required deletion 
from the contract of 1,000 feet of the widened 
channel due to impacts to an existing radio 
tower. This work has been completed under the 
Savannah Harbor Deepening Contract. A final 
modification of approximately $2.7 million for 
excessive dredge downtime was awarded in 
order to close the contract. The total Federal 
Cost exclusive of contract claims and additional 
real estate costs was $8,270,000 and the Non- 
Federal cost was $6,441,000. 
Savannah Harbor Deepening. The Savannah 
Harbor Deepening project was authorized by 
WRDA 92 on October 31, 1992. The LCA was 
signed with the local sponsor, the Georgia Ports 
Authority, on March 2, 1993. Because Federal 
appropriations would be no earlier than FY-95, 
the LCA was written and negotiated to allow 
the local sponsor to up-front the construction 
funds upon project authorization and the signing 
of the LCA. 
The first phase contracts for the Savannah 
Harbor Deepening project was awarded in 
March 1993 for the outer bar channel from 
Station 0+000 to -60 + 000 and the lower inner 
harbor channel from Station 0+000 to 70+000 
for $7,298,876 and $8,748,883, respectively. 
The second phase, that requiring significant real 
estate acquisition, was awarded in July 1993 
from Station 70+000 to 103+000, for 
$4,675,376. The total project scope entails the 
deepening of the harbor by 4 feet, from -38 ft 
mlw to -42 ft mlw in the inner harbor and from - 
40 ft mlw to -44 ft mlw in the bar channel, for 
a total of 31 miles of harbor improvement. 
Construction was initiated with the Inner Harbor 
contract (0 +000 to 70 +000) on May 1, 1993, 
and was completed on April 21, 1994. The 
authorized cost for the Savannah Harbor Deepening 
project is $50,050,000. The current 
estimated cost for the project is $33,000,000. 
In the FY-95 appropriations bill, Congress provided 
$11,585,000 as reimbursement to the 
local sponsor for the Federal share of the NED 
plan. The appropriations bill also provided the 
$2,083,000 of those funds be provided for the 
cost shared Savannah Riverwalk Extension. The 
PCA for the Savannah Riverwalk Extension 
Project was executed on July 21, 1995. The 
current estimate for the project is $3,487,000, 
of which the Federal share is fixed at $2,083,- 
000 and the City of Savannah's share is $1,40- 
4,000. Work is nearing completion, scheduled 
for May 24, 1996. 
Maintenance. The District dredged the Sediment 
Basin during the first quarter of FY-94 
using Eastern Dredging Company dredge "Arlington", 
removing 1,286,371 cubic yards of 
material at a cost of $719,110. The District 
dredged from station 0+000 to 112+500 
using "M" Operating Company dredge "Stuart" 
and Wright Dredging Company dredge "Enter- 
8-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
prise" removing 3,521,566 cubic yards of 
material at a cost of $4,735,602. The District 
used NATCO Limited Partnership to dredge the 
Bar Channel in FY-95 using the dredge "Dodge 
Island". The dredge removed 1,993,062 cubic 
yards of material at a cost of $2,487,306. 
Total costs for operation and maintenance for 
the FY was $8,238,169 which included such 
items as salinity monitoring, surveying, cultural 
resources. The Tidegate was taken out of 
operation in 1991 because of increase in salinity 
levels in wildlife refuge. $240,000 was provided 
to continue the Long Term Management 
Study for dredged material disposal in Savannah 
Harbor. 
Condition at the end of the FY. Training walls, 
jetties, and other structures are in fair condition. 
Authorized channels are maintained by a 
planned dredging program with work at critical 
areas when necessary. The notice on the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement appeared in 
the Federal Register June 25, 1976. Notices of 
availability on two Final Supplements to the 
Environmental Impact Statement appeared in 
the Federal Register September 25, 1978, and 
January 8, 1980. 
6. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA 
Location. Savannah River is formed by the 
confluence of the Tugaloo and Seneca Rivers on 
the boundary line between South Carolina and 
Georgia. It flows southeast 314 miles, forming 
the boundary line between two states, and empties 
into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below 
Savannah, GA. (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 
11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of 
South Carolina and Georgia.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1813 of 
Annual Report 1915 and page 581 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides 
for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet 
wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 secondfeet 
at Augusta, GA) from the upper end of the 
Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at 
Augusta, above the 13th Street Bridge (R.M. 
202.6), a total distance of about 181 miles. A 
lock and dam is located approximately 1 5 miles 
below the upper limit of the project at New 
Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained 
by construction of contraction works, closure of 
cutoffs, bank protection, dredging, removal of 
snags, over hanging trees and wrecks, and 
open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at 
the mouth of the river is 7 feet. Freshet variation 
above the normal pool level (elevation 
114.5 mean sea level) of New Savannah Bluff 
Lock and Dam at mile 187 is ordinarily about 13 
feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Due to lack of 
commercial use, the river has not been dredged 
since FY-79. 
Local cooperation. Complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. The only water terminals 
served by this improvement are at Augusta, 
Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta 
provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 
and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a state 
port at Augusta, GA, costing about $418,000. 
These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an 
additional cost of about $250,000. These are 
supplemented by natural landings along the river 
and extensive facilities at Savannah. 
Operations and results during FY. In general, 
open-channel works are in good condition. The 
notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement 
appeared in the Federal Register February 
18, 1977. The total cost for the year was 
$637,975. There were no dredging projects 
during this FY. 
7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS 
Survey Section performed condition surveys on 
the following active O&M navigation projects: 
AIWW 
Brunswick Harbor 
Savannah Harbor 
Savannah River Below Augusta 
8. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(See Table 8-C.) 
9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
Under Section 107 of the Continuing Authorities 
Program for small navigation a Reconnaisance 
Report was completed with funds received of 
$15,000, recommending the need for deepening 
the Port Wentworth channel of upper Savannah 
Harbor. Negotiating with local sponsor to enter 
into the Feasibility Phase. 
8-6

SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 
Beach Erosion Control 
10. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
11. TYBEE ISLAND, GA 
Location. Tybee island is located directly south 
of the Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles 
east of the City of Savannah, GA. (See NOAA 
11512, 11513, and 11509, formerly U. S. 
Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Numbers 
440, 1240, and 1241, and on maps included in 
HD 92-105, 92nd Cong.) The only portion of 
the island that has developed is bounded on the 
north by the south channel of the Savannah 
River, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and on 
the south and west by Tybee Creek and other 
small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter 
referred to as "Tybee Island," is occupied by the 
City of Tybee Island. The ocean face of this 
area has a wide sandy beach. Tybee Island is 
about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the 
mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of 
about 0.5 miles. Behind the beach lies a line of 
sand dunes, a number of which have been 
removed during the years to make room for 
improvements and for various other reasons. 
Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. 
The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 
10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt 
marsh. 
Existing project. The approved project plan of 
improvement provides for an 800-foot rock 
groin at the north end of the island, with a 225- 
foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200- 
foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are 
two additional intermediate groins (480 feet 
long); these will be added at a later date, if 
needed. The plan also provides for the initial 
restoration of approximately 13,300 feet of 
beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the 
terminal groin located at the northern end of the 
island. Periodic nourishment will be provided as 
needed to maintain suitable beach dimensions. 
In 1981, the plan was modified and now calls 
for the addition of a groin at the south end and 
modification and rehabilitation of the north rock 
groin and renourishment. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) 
contribute in cash the required percentage of 
the first cost (including costs for construction, 
engineering and design, and administration; and 
excluding the cost of lands, easements, rightsof-
way and relocation) of all items of work to be 
provided by the Corps of Engineers. The local 
contribution is presently estimated at 51.0 
percent to be paid in a lump sum prior to start 
of construction or in installments prior to the 
start of pertinent work items in accordance with 
construction schedules as required by the Chief 
of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to 
be made after the actual costs have been determined; 
(b) provide maintenance and repair of the 
groins, and provide (after the first 10 years of 
project life) periodic nourishment of the restored 
beach as may be required to serve the intended 
purpose during the life of the project; (c) provide 
without cost to the United States all lands, 
easements rights-of-way, and relocations required 
for construction and subsequent nourishment 
of the project; (e) control water pollution 
to the extent necessary to safeguard the health 
of bathers; and (f) provide without cost to the 
United States access and facilities necessary for 
realization of the public benefits upon which 
Federal participation is based, and maintain 
continued public use of the beach and administer 
it for public use during the life of the project, 
and provide further the construction on the 
project shall not be started until local interests 
furnish lands for beach access and parking, 
satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the 
reach from First Street to the terminal groin. To 
date, local cooperation is being provided as 
required. 
Condition at the end of the FY. In January 
1987, the South Groin contract was completed 
at a cost of $607,392. In February 1987, the 
first periodic renourishment contract was awarded, 
calling for the placement of approximately 1 
million cubic yards of sand on two reaches of 
the island; the south end from the mouth of 
Tybee Creek to 14th Street, and the north end 
from the North terminal groin to about 6th 
Street. The contract was completed in May 
1987, at a contract cost of $1,988,843. A 
Beach monitoring program was performed for 
three years to monitor the performance of the 
design. The Local Sponsor has invested over 
$200,000 in additional funds for the implementation 
of a dune building program for the 
North and South ends of the islands. FY costs 
were $27,143. A reevaluation study under 
Section 934 WRDA 86 was initiated in 1990 for 
the Tybee Island Beach Erosion Control Project. 
The purpose of the study is to determine if the 
authorized Tybee Island Beach Erosion Control 
Project should be extended to a project life of 
50 years, and determine if the Federal Government 
should continue to participate in the 
8-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
project. The study is using current Federal 
policy and economic guidelines to evaluate the 
economic and environmental feasibility of additional 
periodic beach nourishment. The study is 
scheduled for completion in March 1995. 
FLOOD CONTROL 
12. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN AT OATES 
CREEK, GA 
Oates Creek is a major drainage outlet for flood 
water from an urban area of Augusta, GA. A 
flood control study of Oates Creek was authorized 
and completed as part of the Savannah 
River Basin study. The Oates Creek study area 
is located just south of Augusta, in Richmond 
County. 
The recommended plan is a channel and bridge 
modification flood control plan and has received 
support from Federal, State, and local governmental 
agencies with no environmental opposition. 
In 1987, the local sponsor, Richmond 
County, expressed support for the project and 
intent to participate financially. The plan consists 
of improvements to approximately 12,300 
feet of channel and consists of concrete-lined 
channels, grass-lined channels, a low levee, 
modifications of bridges and culverts, and 
relocation of utilities. The CP&E effort began in 
October 1983 and consisted of the preparation 
of a General Design Memorandum. Upon the 
completion and approval of the General Design 
Memorandum (Sep 1986), negotiations were 
initiated with the local sponsor to develop a 
Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA). The LCA 
was signed by Richmond County and the Assistant 
Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) on 
March 10, 1988. FY expenditures were $157,- 
252. Conditions at end of FY-95: During FY- 
93, the final audits were completed for both the 
Federal and non-Federal costs, which revised 
downward the total project cost from $14,000,- 
000 to $12,565,000. The revised FEMA mapping 
has been prepared in order to reduce the 
flood insurance costs of the inhabitants of the 
Oates Creek Basin. The Operation and Maintenance 
manual was completed in December 
1993 and the project was turned over to Richmond 
County for long term maintenance. 
13. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
Expenditures for inspections of completed flood 
control projects amounted to $48,747. (See 
Table 8-A&D.) 
14. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL 
PROJECTS 
(See Table 8-D) 
15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
These Flood Damage Reduction activities are 
accomplished under the authority of Section 
205, Flood Control Act of 1948 (Public Law 
858, 80th Congress) as amended. During FY- 
95 a total of $108,036 was spent on preauthorization 
flood damage reduction studies. 
Study efforts during the FY were as follows: 
Cranes Creek, Richmond County, GA, Reconnaissance 
Phase - $48,036; Ohoopee River, 
Emanuel County, GA, completed Reconnaissance 
Phase - $52,500; Swift Creek, Toombs 
County, GA, Reconnaissance Phase - $7,500. 
Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 
16. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE 
PROTECTION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
During FY-95, meetings were held with representatives 
from Fort Jackson to discuss conducting 
erosion and protection studies at Fort 
Jackson, along the Savannah River in Chatham 
County, Georgia under Section 103 of the River 
and Harbor Act of 1962. Letter requesting 
assistance received from local officials during 
FY-95. 
During FY-95, a Feasibility study of streambank 
erosion and protection for the city of Baldwin, 
Georgia was started at a cost of $10,000. If 
Federal interest is found, the study will continue 
to Plans and Specifications at an additional cost 
of $70,000. The study will be completed in FY- 
96 and is being conducted under Section 14 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 
8-8

SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 
Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 
17. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT 
OF ENVIRONMENT UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
These project modifications are accomplished 
under the authority of Section 1135, Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 
99-662) as amended. Environmental modification 
study efforts during FY-95 were as follows: 
Savannah Harbor, Chatham County, GA - Jasper 
County, SC, monitored post construction environmental 
and cultural effects - cost shared 
funding, $72,016 (Federal) and $21,982 (non- 
Federal). Latham River/Jekyll Creek completed 
Initial Appraisal at a cost of $2,500. 
18. LOWER SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL 
RESTORATION STUDY 
The feasibility phase was initiated June 1993. 
The cost sharing plan requires a 50% cost share 
with the non-Federal sponsor (City of Savannah). 
Of this non-Federal 50%, up to 25% can 
be from in-kind services. The feasibility study is 
concentrating on restoring the flow through 
cutoff bends #3 and #4, and consequentially, 
restoring flow and water quality to the surrounding 
wetlands. The alternatives include 
reopening of Mill Creek and complete and partial 
closure of Cuts #3 and #4. Cost-shared expenditures 
for FY-95 were $172,392 (Federal), 
$144,192 (non-Federal). 
Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 
19. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC 
Location. Works covered by this project consist 
of a series of eleven dams and lakes on the 
Savannah River and its tributaries in GA and SC. 
(See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) 
Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 
approved the general plan for comprehensive 
development of the Savannah River basin for 
flood control and other purposes (HD/657, 78th 
Cong., 2d sess.) and authorized construction of 
the J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir 
Project on the Savannah River in Georgia and 
South Carolina as the initial step of this development. 
The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized 
construction of the Hartwell Lake under 
the general plan. Richard B. Russell (formerly 
Trotters Shoals) was authorized for construction 
by the Flood control Act of 1966 at an estimated 
cost of $84,900,000. J. Strom Thurmond 
Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell Lake, and Richard 
B. Russell Dam and Lake are the only projects in 
the comprehensive plan that have been constructed. 
(See Table 8-E on Dams and Lakes.) 
Duke Power company has completed construction 
on the Keowee-Toxaway power complex on 
the Keowee River in the headwaters of Hartwell 
Lake and construction of the Jacassee pumpstorage 
power project in the headwaters of the 
Keowee-Toxaway project. The Keowee-Toxaway 
power complex is located on the Newry- 
Old Pickens site identified in the approved 
comprehensive plan. Individual reports on J. 
Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell, 
and Richard B. Russell Lakes follow. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
19A. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND LAKE 
GA AND SC, (formerly Clarks Hill Lake) 
Location. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Lake 
is located at mile 237.7 on the Savannah River 
about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, GA. 
(See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides 
for construction of J. Strom Thurmond 
Dam and Reservoir, the final cost of which was 
$79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 
2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 
feet and a controlled spillway 1,096 feet long. 
The concrete section is flanked on the west side 
by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet and 
on the east side by a similar embankment of 
1,329 feet. 
The total length of the dam is 5,680 feet. The 
lake covers 71,100 acres at maximum power 
pool elevation 330 msl. It provides a total 
storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated 
as follows: flood control 390,000 acre-feet; 
hydropower 1,045,000 acre-feet; dead storage 
1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000-kilowatt 
generators have a combined generating capacity 
of 282,000 kilowatts with an average annual 
output of 700 million kilowatt-hours of electrical 
energy. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
8-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Operations and results during FY. Net generations 
of electric energy for the period was 
834,578 kilowatt-hours, most of which was 
delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. 
Cumulative flood damage prevented 
through FY-95 was $27,679,098. 
Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs 
during the FY amounted to $8,231,618. The 
notice of availability on the Final Environmental 
Impact Statement on J. Strom Thurmond Dam 
and Reservoir Operation and Maintenance appeared 
in the December 18, 1981 Federal Register. 
In FY-95 7,544,767 persons visited the 
facility. 
Condition at the end of the FY. Construction is 
complete except for providing additional recreational 
development. (See Table 8-A for Cost 
and Financial Statement.) 
Major Rehabilitation. The J. Strom Thurmond 
Powerplant has been identified as a project for 
the Major Rehabilitation Program. An Evaluation 
Report was approved in July 1994. FY-96 
Appropriations were provided in the FY-96 
Energy and Water Bill in November 1996. 
Design is underway with RFP scheduled to be 
issued September 1996. Current estimate is 
$69,000,000. Project is to be complete April 
2003. Scope includes replacement of the seven 
turbines, the rewinding the generators, and the 
replacement of key electrical/mechanical peripheral 
equipment. 
19B. HARTWELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC 
Location. Hartwell Dam and Lake is on the 
Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 
89 miles upstream from Augusta, GA (See 
Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) 
Existing project. The dam is a concrete gravitytype 
structure 1,900 feet long with a maximum 
height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 568 
feet in length. The concrete section is flanked 
on the east and west abutments by earth embankments 
totaling 13,390 feet in length and by 
a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west 
side. Total length of the dam is 17,880 feet. 
At maximum conservation pool elevation of 660 
feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity 
of the lake is 2,843,000 acre-feet of storage 
allocated as follows: flood control - 293,000 
acre-feet; hydropower - 1,416,000 acre-feet; 
dead storage - 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 
66,000 kilowatt generators having a generating 
capacity of 264,000 kilowatts were installed 
initially with provisions for a future unit. A fifth 
80,000 kilowatt generating unit has been installed 
which increased the rated capacity to 
344,000 kilowatts. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during the FY. Net 
generation of electrical energy for the period 
amounted to 524,056,600 kilowatt-hours, most 
of which was delivered to the Southeastern 
Power Administration. Cumulative flood damage 
prevented through FY-95 is $12,590,652. 
Maintenance. Operation and maintenance costs 
during the FY amounted to $8,803,009. The 
notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement 
on the operation and maintenance of 
Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal 
Register on August 21, 1978. Approximately 
12,748,707 persons visited the lake in FY-95. 
During FY-95 funds were expended for the E&D 
phase of the major rehabilitation of the four 
original units at the Hartwell power facility. 
Major Rehabilitation. The Hartwell Powerplant 
Major Rehabilitation project was approved by 
HQUSACE, and was included in the FY-96 
budget. The project scope includes the rewinding 
of the first four generators, the refurbishment 
of the turbine water passageways, and the 
replacement of key electrical/mechanical peripheral 
equipment. The fully funded cost for the 
recommended plan is $17,700,000. Award of 
the main rewind and turbine refurbishment 
contract is scheduled for May 1996. The award 
of the circuit breaker contract is scheduled for 
June 1996. 
19C. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, 
GA AND SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA 
and SC) 
Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is located on 
the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its 
mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam, and 
about 37.4 miles above J. Strom Thurmond 
Dam (formerly Clarks Hill Dam). (See NOAA 
Survey maps of GA and SC.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides 
for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam 
and Lake substantially in accordance with the 
recommendations. The latest approved (FY-95) 
costs estimate for the project is $576,800,000 
of which $441,455,000 is for construction; 
8-10

SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 
$28,657,000 for lands and damages; $4,857,- 
000 for cultural resources; and $108,299,000 
for engineering/design, supervision/administration, 
and all project studies including 
environmental. Approval was received in January 
1977 to include minimum provisions for 
pumped storage. 
A Feasibility Report and Final Environmental 
Impact Statement to address the installation and 
operation of four 75 MW reversible pump-turbines 
were prepared in 1979 with the Record of 
Decision signed in August 1980. The Richard 
B. Russell Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Plan was 
completed in 1981, approved by the Assistant 
Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) in September 
1982, and the provisions are being implemented. 
Since 1986, the District has conducted comprehensive 
fishery studies in the Russell tailrace 
and J. Strom Thurmond Lake (formerly Clarks 
Hill Lake) downstream. In addition, the District 
conducted water quality studies, hydraulic 
modeling, and an evaluation of various fish 
protection measures associated with hydroelectric 
projects. The results of these study efforts 
have been used to evaluate the need to develop 
fish protection at the Richard B. Russell Project 
associated with pumped storage operations. 
This evaluation is presented in a supplement to 
the Final Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) 
on pumped storage. The record-of-decision 
(ROD) was signed September 1991. Installation 
of pumped storage is complete; final Phase Ill 
environmental testing is scheduled through 
October 1995. 
Additional Lake Russell camping is being built in 
the Calhoun Falls, South Carolina cost-shared 
State Park. The District will also construct 
additional Georgia cost-shared camping in FY 
95/96. 
Local Cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation 
Act. Public Law 89-72; 79 stat. 213C 
(for Legislative history of Act see page 1864). 
Operations and Results During FY. Net generations 
of electric energy for the period was 
547,476 megawatt-hours. 
Maintenance. The operation and maintenance 
cost for the FY amounted to $5,852,098. 
These funds were for management of lake and 
power activities. Approximately 1,021,290 
persons visited the lake in FY-95. 
Condition at the end of FY. The project is 99 
percent complete. 
Costs of project to September 30, 1995, were 
$623,607,589 of which $574,141,631 was 
used for new work and $49,465,958 for maintenance. 
(See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial 
Statement.) 
During FY-95, CG funds were used to complete 
acquisition of Georgia and South Carolina lands 
as R.B. Russell mitigation lands to compensate 
for wildlife habitat lost from construction of 
Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake. In accordance 
with the 1982 R.B. Russell mitigation 
plan as authorized by Section 601(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL. 
99-662), approximately 10,100 acres would be 
acquired in South Carolina and an additional 
11,400 acres acquired in Georgia. The District 
worked closely with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, the South Carolina Wildlife and Marine 
Resources Department, and the Georgia Department 
of Natural Resources to locate, study and 
acquire suitable tracts. Acquisition of land in 
FY-92 in South Carolina consisted of the 3,408 
acre Donnelly Wildlife Management Area in 
Colleton County. In Georgia, the 1,153 acre R. 
E. Towns Tract in Screven County was acquired 
along with the 8,046 acre Di-Lane Plantation in 
Burke county. Also in Georgia, the 2,424 acre 
Spring Lake Tract was purchased from Thompson 
Oak Flooring Company. Total project funding 
through FY-95 is $34,737,191. The acquired 
tracts are being managed for wildlife by 
the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources 
and the Georgia Department of Natural 
Resources respectively. 
Acquisition of land in FY-95 in South Carolina 
consisted of the 5,878 acre Palachucola Tract 
from Westvaco Cooperation in Jasper/Hampton 
Counties, and 297 acre Manor Tract, and 582 
acre Treadwell Tract, both in Hampton County. 
20. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE 
RIVER 
Location. The West Point Lake is located on the 
Chattahoochee River, 2.8 miles upstream from 
West Point, GA, and was authorized by the 
Flood Control Act of 1962 (H.D. 570, 87th 
Cong., 2d sess.). The project was designed and 
constructed for flood control, power, recreation, 
fish and wildlife development, and stream flow 
regulation for downstream navigation. Design 
and construction was accomplished by the 
8-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Savannah District, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers 
for the Mobile District, U.S. Army Corps 
of Engineers. For more detail, see the Mobile, 
Alabama District's Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
U. S. Army 1987. 
General Investigation 
21. PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES 
Planning Assistance to States activities are accomplished 
under the authority of Section 22, 
Water Resources Development Act of 1974, as 
amended. During FY-95, a total of $1,976 was 
expended on the Planning Assistance to States 
study. 
22. SURVEYS 
During FY-95, costs of $503,019 were incurred 
as follows: $365,123 for Navigation studies; 
$38,157 for Special studies - Partnerships; 
$97,763 for Miscellaneous activities. $1,976 
for Coordinating Studies with Other Agencies. 
23. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC 
DATA 
During FY-95, under the Flood Plain Management 
Services Program, flood hazard related 
information and assistance were provided to 
state and local governments on a nonreimbursable 
basis and to other Federal agencies and 
private persons on a cost recovery basis. Total 
FY-95 expenditures were $46,239 for General 
Flood Plain Management Services; $93,937 for 
Technical Services; $53,060 for six Special 
Studies; $47 for National Flood Proofing Committee; 
$6,805 for Quick Responses; and $16,- 
424 for Hydrologic Studies. 
24. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 
No funds were expended for research and development 
during the fiscal year. 
Miscellaneous. 
25. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCY 
Disaster Preparedness............ 282,000 
Emergency Work for Others: 
Hurricane Marilyn............. $130,000 
Support to CESAD.............$315,Q0 
Total FC&CE................ $427,000 
26. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 
(NEPP) 
National Preparedness...........$2.14,000 
27. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS 
Permit Evaluation .......... 
Enforcement .............. 
Studies .................. 
Other Navigation Regulations .. . 
EIS . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 
.$2,015,02D 
S. $552,000 
... $38,476 
... $18,255 
...... .$0 
Total Regulatory ........... $2,623,7.5.1 
8-12

SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY-92 FY-93 FY-94 FY-95 Sep 30, 1995 
1. Altamaha, Oconee, 
& Ocmulgee Rivers, 
GA 
2. Aquatic Plant Control 
(1965 R&H 
Act) 
3. Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway between 
Norfolk, 
VA, and the St. 
John's River, FL 
4. Brunswick Harbor, 
GA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
5. Savannah Harbor, 
GA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
6. Savannah River 
below Augusta, 
GA 
11. Tybee Island, GA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost: 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
-- 821,457(1) 
-- 821,457(1) 
-- 1,917,982(2,3) 
-- 1,917,982(2,3) 
50,000 
97,055 
77,000 70,000 
27,864 67,282 
-- 958,096 
-- 958,096 
2,326,000 1,665,000 
2,285,093 1,637,630 
32,000 
24,366 
375,000 2,334,000 
423,007 2,342,397 
-- -- 15,000 
-- -- 36,137 
2,260,000 4,012,000 3,690,000 
2,234,587 4,013,393 3,718,944 
132,000 
135,398 
3,160,000 
3,175,711 
1,040,159 
943,736 
958,096(4) 
958,096(4) 
28,438,507(5) 
28,422,552(5) 
4,720,608(6) 
4,977,256(6) 
82,856,928(7) 
82,714,125(7) 
-- 450,000 
-- 100,000 
2,851,000 
2,539,625 
4,458,000 
4,679,913 
2,141,000 
2,149,835 
8,935,000 
9,051,556 
-825,000 
56,312 
7,263,000 
7,285,916 
11,787,000 
8,055,639 
8,444,000 
8,580,793 
1,457,460 24,700,350 4,244,267 -7,390,400 
1,677,801 6,207,674 20,108,977 -6,468,694 
66,511,721(8) 
64,047,901(8) 
198,828,693(9) 
198,868,023(9) 
25,011,677 
21,525,758 
-- 6,790,031(10) 
-- 6,790,031(10) 
86,000 137,000 228,000 
67,028 138,602 200,008 
30,000 
53,953 
20,430 
15,100 
50,000 100,000 
50,641 104,290 
600,000 
637,975 
25,000 
27,143 
-- 4,842 
19,161,771 
19,129,937 
4,685,249(11) 
4,681,944(11) 
20,430 
19,942 
8-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY-92 FY-93 FY-94 FY-95 Sep 30, 1995 
12. Oates Creek, Richmond 
County, GA 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
13. Inspection of Completed 
Flood Control 
Works 
17A. J. Strom Thurmond 
Dam and 
Reservoir, GA and 
SC 
17B. Hartwell Lake, GA 
and SC 
17C. Richard B. Russell 
Dam and Lake, GA 
and SC (Formerly 
Trotters Shoals) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
2,568,000 
2,486,766 
296,534 
227,914 
16,000 
19,725 
18,595 
7,256,000 
7,319,291 
-3,000 
-114 
7,524,900 
7,372,891 
20,000 
10,284 
26,111,000 
25,249,166 
4,643,900 
4,784,343 
50,000 
-- 149,000 
157,253 179,344 
10,932 
9,173,000 
9,159,144 
296,534 
265,828 
442,064 
440,801 
26,982 
35,000 39,000 
35,090 28,638 
-- -3,500 
-- -3,500 
8,067,000 8,254,000 
8,113,071 8,206,679 
-- -1,940 
8,551,000 8,379,000 
8,918,215 8,309,056 
23,838,000 
14,679,960 
4,847,000 
4,838,432 
22,232 
50,000 
12,259,500 
21,281,065 
5,828,000 
5,775,506 
19,496 
39,000 
48,747
-- 84,880,940(12) 
-- 84,876,004(12) 
8,161,100 141,948,345(13) 
8,231,618 141,579,167(13) 
-- 115,874,985(14,15) 
-- 115,876,925(14,15) 
8,540,100 132,656,627(16) 
8,803,009 133,296,114(16) 
18,545,000 
19,398,075 
5,820,100 
5,852,098 
6,666,950 
6,640,536 
600,786,000 
598,781,946 
40,406,991 
49,465,958 
1,109 
4,109 
73,341 
73,605 
1. Includes $760,610 for previous projects. 
2. Includes $111,950 for previous projects. 
3. Does not include $69,356 contributed funds. 
4. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. 
5. Includes $134,789 for previous projects. Does 
not include $35,000 appropriated but unexpended 
of contributed funds in FY's 86 and 87. 
6. Includes $643,456 for previous projects and 
$97,521 expended from Public Works Funds for 
existing project. Does not include $10,000 
contributed funds. 
7. Includes $54,414 for previous projects, $4,995 
expended from Public Works Funds for existing 
project, and $2,150,000 under 1983 Job Bill Act. 
Does not include contributed funds by Brunswick and 
Georgia Port Authority. 
8. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does 
not include $46,847 for removal of sunken vessels 
or contributed funds. 
9. Includes $298,894 for previous projects and 
$62,727 contributed funds. 
8-14

SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 
10. Includes $93,480 for previous projects and 
$1,634,562 from Public Works Fund. 
11. Does not include $61,856.45 contributed 
funds. 
12. Does not include $395,634 accelerated Public 
Works Funds. Includes $4,558,613 appropriated 
under Code 710. Also includes 
$1,000,000 expended under the 1983 Job 
Bill Act. 
13. Includes $576,665 under special recreation 
use fees and $736,000 under the 1983 Job 
Bill Act. 
14. Includes $17,515,000 appropriated for construction 
of 5th Unit of which $17,469,002 
has been expended. 
15. Does not include $276,200 accelerated Public 
Works Funds. Includes $4,861,000 appropriated 
under Code 710 of which $4,851,306 
has been expended and $545,000 expended 
under the 
1983 Job Bill Act. 
16. Includes $797,558 expended special recreation 
use fees. 
8-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorized 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
1. July 25, 1912 
& March 2, 1945 
2. Oct. 27, 1965 
Section 302 
3. 
June 3, 1896 
Mar. 3, 1899 
July 13, 1892 
Mar. 3, 1905 
July 25, 1912 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Mar. 3, 1925 
July 3, 1930 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Aug. 26, 1937 
June 20, 1938 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Oct. 15, 1981 
ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND OCMULGEE 
RIVERS, GA 
Channel 3 feet deep and 60 to 100 feet wide. 
AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT 1962) 
Provides for control and progressive eradication of 
noxious aquatic plant growths. 
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN 
NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL 
(SAVANNAH DISTRICT) 
Section from Beaufort, SC, to Savannah, GA 
Route No. 2 adopted. 
Route No. 1 adopted. 
Section from Savannah, GA, to Fernandina, FL. 
Original 7-foot channel. 
Provided for Skidaway Narrows. 
Incorporated alternative routes previously improved 
as separate projects and the auxiliary channels. 
Section from Cumberland Sound, GA and FL to 
St. Johns River, FL. Consolidation of the 3 sections 
shown above, into "Waterway between 
Beaufort SC, and St. Johns River, FL." 
Section from Beaufort, SC to Cumberland Sound 
GA and FL. Removing logs and snags from Generals 
Cut. 
Improving Back River to provide a channel 7 feet 
deep and 150 wide. 
Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, SC, and 
Savannah, GA. 
Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek. 
A 7-foot protected channel around St. Andrews 
Sound. 
A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, 
GA, via Beaufort River and Port Royal 
Sound. 
A 12-foot channel between Savannah, GA, and 
Fernandina, FL, various cutoffs; and anchorage 
basin at Thunderbolt, GA. 
An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide 
in that part of Frederica River, GA, not now traversed 
by the main route, at no additional cost to 
the United States. 
Main channel relocated from Frederica River to 
Mackay River in the vicinity of Torras Causeway. 
Navigation Project. 
HD443, 62D Cong., 2d sess. 
HD610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. 
HD251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 
HD295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. 
HD295, 53d, Cong., 3d sess. 
HD41, 52d Cong., 1st sess. 
HD450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. 
HD1236, 60th, Cong., 2d 
sess. 
HD581, 63d Cong., 2d sess. 
HD1391, 62d Cong., 3d sess. 
SD178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. 
SD43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 
Senate committee print, 74th 
Cong., 1st sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee, 
Doc 6, 75th Cong.,3d sess. 
HD618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. 
HD114, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 
Project authorized by Chief of 
Engineers under the Small 
Navigation Project Authority, 
Sec. 107, PL 86-645 as amended. 
8-16

SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorized 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
4. Mar. 3, 1879 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Mar 2, 1919 
July 3, 1930 
July 3, 1930 
June 20, 1938 
May 17, 1950 
Oct. 22, 1976 
July 14, 1981 
July 13, 1983 
Oct. 17, 1986 
BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA 
Construction of East River jetty. 
Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot 
depth at mean high water, with widths varying 
from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet 
across the outer bar, extension of training wall in 
East River and construction of two spur dikes. 
Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over 
the bar and at Brunswick point; and 24 feet deep 
at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides 
for a cut from Academy Creek to Turtle 
River, if deemed advisable. 
A channel in Back River 230 feet deep and 150 
feet wide. 
Increased Channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick 
Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given 
in the then existing project. 
A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek. 
Increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. 
Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and 
Turtle River, as given in the existing project. 
Provides for Phase I AE&D studies for deepening 
portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance 
Channel) and for provision of a navigation 
channel to Colonels Island. 
Enlargement of the maneuvering area of the entrance 
to East River and dredging Brunswick and 
Turtle Rivers to obtain depths authorized by the 
Rivers and Harbors Act of May 17, 1950. 
Enlargement of the East River Turning Basin to a 
length of 1,000 feet and a width of 750 feet. 
Incorporated Georgia Port Authority's 30 foot 
deep by 300 foot wide by 8000 foot channel in 
South Brunswick River serving Colonel's Island 
into Brunswick Harbor Navigation Project. 
Annual Report, 1980, p.959. 
HD407, 59th Cong., 1st sess. 
HD393, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 
SD57, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 
SD132, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 
HD690, 75th Cong., 3d sess. 
HD110, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 
Report of Chief of Engineers 
dated Aug. 18, 1976. 
HD177, 97th Cong., 1st sess. 
PL 98-360 
HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess., 
Section 846 
8-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorized 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
5. Mar. 2, 1907 
June 25, 1910 
July 25, 1912 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Jan. 21, 1927 
July 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Nov. 7, 1945 
July 24, 1946 
SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA 
Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from 
the Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line 
Railway Bridge. 
Definite provision for the 26-foot channel. 
A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line 
Railway Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. 
A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine 
Station. 
A 21-foot channel above Kings Island. 
Channel 30 feet deep, with general width 50 feet, 
from the ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 
26 feet deep, general width 400 feet, to the Seaboard 
Air Line Rho. Bridge, thence 21 feet deep 
and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at 
West Broad and Barnard Streets; anchorage basin; 
mooring dolphins; regulating dam across South 
Channel; relocation of the Inland Waterway; dredging 
Drakes Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at 
Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, 
and jetties. Consolidation of projects 
relating to Savannah Harbor. 
Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the 
Seaboard Air Line Rho. Bridge to the foot of Kings 
Island. 
Authorized the 30-foot project and eliminated 
from the project (a) the relating dam across South 
Channel; (b) the relocation of the Inland waterway; 
and (c) the further extension of training 
walls, revetments, and jetties. 
Deepening the channel and turning basin above 
the Seaboard Air Line Rho. Bridge from 26 to 30 
feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic 
Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 
feet for a length of 5,000 feet. 
Deepening the channels to 36 feet deep and 500 
feet wide across the ocean bar; 34 feet deep and 
generally 400 feet wide increased to 550 feet 
opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a 
turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum 
Corp. Refinery; and with such modifications 
thereof as the Secretary of War and the Chief of 
Engineers may consider desirable. 
Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide 
upstream from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a 
point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway 
Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet 
deep at upper end. 
HD181, 59th Cong., 1st sess. 
HD563, 62d, Cong., 2d sess. 
HD1471, 64th Cong., 2d sess. 
HD261,69th Cong., 1st sess. 
HD262,69th Cong., 1st sess. 
SD39, 71st Cong., 1st sess. 
HD276, 73d Cong., 2d sess. 
HD283, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 
HD227, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 
HD678, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 
8-18

SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorized 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Oct 27, 1965 
SPCW Resolution 
June 15, 1976 
and HPWTC of 
June 9, 1976 
under authority of 
Sec. 201 of Flood 
Control Act of 
1965 
Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 
400 feet from the upper end of the presently 
authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the 
American Oil Company Refinery wharf, to the 
Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp. with a turning 
basin at the upper end of the proposed improvement 
made by widening the channel to 600 
feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. 
Enlargement of turning basin near Kings Island to 
a width of 900 feet and a length of 1,000 feet, 
with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. 
Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 
feet, the channel between the bar channel and 
Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet, and 
the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the 
vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., 
from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel 
from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between 
Fort Pulaski and the Atlantic Coast Line Terminal 
from 400 feet to 500 feet, and the channel between 
Garden City Terminal and the Savannah 
Sugar Refinery Corp., from 200 feet to 400 feet; 
providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing 
a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 
1,000 feet long by 34 feet deep opposite the 
Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of 
existing turning basin at the American Oil Company 
Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long 
to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. 
Providing sediment control works consisting of 
tide gate structure across Back River; sediment 
basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide about 2 miles 
long, with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep 
and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for 
supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildlife 
Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to 
presently improved areas other than refuge lands. 
Provided for modification of the existing project to 
include (1) incorporation of the LASH Turning 
Basin as an element of the existing Federal navigation 
project for maintenance purposes, (2) enlargement 
of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 
feet by 38 feet. 
HD110, 83d Cong., 1st sess. 
SD115, 87th Cong., 1st sess. 
HD226, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 
HD223, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 
HD94-520, 94th Cong. dated 
June 8, 1976. 
8-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorized 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
July 16,1984 
Oct. 17, 1986 
Oct. 31, 1992 
6. Sep. 13, 1891 
June 25, 1910 
July 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 26, 1937 
May 17, 1950 
11. SPWC Resolution 
June 22, 1971, 
HPWC of June 
23, 1972 under 
authority of Sec. 
201 of FC Act of 
1965 
Oct. 17, 1986 
12. Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1986, Oct. 17, 
1986 
Construction of three new work curve wideners in 
the inner harbor channel. Curve Widener #1 is 
between mile 11.1 and 11.9. Curve widener #2 
is between mile 13.2 and 13.8 and curve widener 
#3 is between mile 14.0 and 14.8. The Wideners 
are located on the north side of the channel. 
Savannah Harbor Widening as described in Report 
of Chief of Engineers date Dec. 19, 1978. Widen 
channel from 400 feet to 500 feet between Kings 
Island turning Basin and Fig Island Turning Basin. 
Allows planning, engineering and design to remove 
drift and debris as part of operations and 
maintenance. 
Savannah Harbor Deepening deepened harbor 
from -38 feet to -42 feet mlw in Inner Harbor and 
from -40 feet to -44 feet mlw in the Bar Channel 
for a total of 31 miles of harbor improvements. 
SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA 
For a 5-foot channel 
Special improvement by bank protection work of 
20 to 25 miles of the river immediately below 
Augusta. 
The present 6-foot channel project and Lock and 
Dam, GA. 
Provision made for locating the lock and dam at 
New Savannah Bluff. 
Conditions of local cooperation modified. 
Provides for a 9-foot channel. 
TYBEE ISLAND, GA 
Project will provide for beach erosion control, consisting 
of beach restoration, groin nourishment. 
Extends authority for renourishment with Federal 
participation from 15 to 50 years. 
OATES CREEK, GA 
Provided for construction of the Oates Creek 
Project. 
PL 98-360 
HD6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 
201 
Section 867 
WRDA 1992 
HD255, 51st Cong., 2d sess. 
HD962, 60th Cong., 1st sess. 
HD101, 70th Cong., 1st sess. 
Senate Committee Print, 73d 
Cong., 2d sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Com., Doc. 
39, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 
SD6, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 
HD105, 92d Cong. 
HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 
867 
HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 
dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 
401 
8-20

SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorized 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
19A. Flood Control Act 
of Dec. 22, 1944 
Oct. 17, 1986 
Jan. 1988 
19B. Flood Control Act 
of May 17, 1950. 
J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND LAKE, GA&SC 
Approved the general plan for the comprehensive 
development of the Savannah River Basin and provided 
for construction of the Project. 
Recreation and fish and wildlife added as name 
changed. (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake.) 
HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC 
Provided for construction of Hartwell Project. 
Flood Control Act Provided for the completion of the Hartwell Proof 
July 3, 1958. ject. 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1976. 
19C. Flood Control Act 
of Nov. 7, 1966. 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1986 
Provides for installation of 5th unit. 
RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC 
Provided for construction of the Trotters Shoals 
Project. 
Authorized mitigation plan. 
HD657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 
HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Section 864, HJR 376 
HD657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 
PL516, 82st Cong., 2d sess. 
PL85-500, 87th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
PL94-587, Sec. 182b., 
85th Cong. 
SD52, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 
HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 
dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 
601 
8-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 8-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(See Section 8 in text) 
Cost to September 30, 1994 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance 
BelIville Point, GA 
Cedar Point, GA 
Darien Harbor, GA 
Fancy Bluff Creek, GA 1 
St. Mary's River, GA and FL, 
and North River, GA 
Sapelo Harbor, GA 2, 3 
Satilla River, GA 1, 5, 6 
Savannah River above Augusta, 
GA 2, 3, 4 
Savannah River at Augusta, GA 
2,3, 5 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
See Notes 
See Notes 
1986 
1982 
1975 
1935 
1951 
1929 
1951 
1929 
1929 
599,379 
656,233 
199,723 
8,000 
15,688 
17,906 
9,452 
69,600 
200,556 
185,433 
7,200 
69,936 
19,594 
57,172 
85,944 
17,444 
1. Channel adequate for commerce. 
2. Project recommended for abandonment in H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st session. 
3. No commerce reported. 
4. About 84 percent completed. Owing to construction of two power dams which submerged much of the work 
under the present and former projects, this improvement cannot be completed as originally planned. 
5. Excludes $185,000 contributed funds ($172,151 for construction and $12,849 for operation and 
maintenance). 
6. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized demonstration project on the Umbrella Creek - Dover 
Creek for the purpose of reducing shoaling. Monitor for 10 years, develop a hydrodynamic model. 
8-22

SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 8-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 14 in text) 
Cost to September 30, 1994 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance 
Augusta, Savannah River, GA 
Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA 
(1) 
Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden 
County, GA 
Macon, GA 
Oates Creek, GA (2) 
Peacock Creek, Liberty County, 
GA 
Completed 
See Note 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
1941 
1974 
1977 
1955 
1993 
1976 
$ 643,016 
132,640 
380,043 
12,565,000 
582,163 
1. Feasibility report completed. Project not authorized for construction. 
2. Authorized by HR 6, Water Resource Development Act of 1986 dated October 17, 1986. First Federal cost 
of $9,600,000 and non-federal cost of $4,100,000. 
8-23 
$38,242 
5,219 
38,243 
5,219

R~EPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 8-E SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC 
DAMS AND LAKES 
(See Section 19 In text) 
Estimated Cost 
Name River Federal Non-Federal Total 
J. Strom Thurmond Dam & 
Reservoir, GA and SC 
Hartwell, GA and SC 
Goat Island, GA and SC(5) 
Middleton Shoals, GA and SC(5) 
iAttooga Units(4), GA and SC 
Talow Hill, GA 
Anthony Shoals, GA 
Newry-Old Pickens, SC(S3) 
Savannah 
Savannah 
Savannah 
Savannah 
Chattooga 
Broad 
Broad 
Cowee 
$79,156,000(4) 
89,240,000 
36,400,000 
16,500,000 
41,700,000 
39,000,000 
18,100,000 
29,500,000 
$79,156,000(1,4) 
89,240,000(2) 
36,400,000(3) 
16,500,000(3) 
41,700,000(3) 
39,000,000(3) 
18,100,000(3) 
29,500,000(3) 
1. Final Cost. (Excludas $127,000 for preauthorization study.) 
2. Approved August 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for preauthorization study.) 
3. Approved July 1954. 
4. Excludes Code 710 funds. 
5. Replaced by Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake (formerly Trotters Shoals Lake). 
6. Site of Due Power Company, Keowee - Toxaway Project. 
8-24 
~i--7

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT* 
With the exception of a small area in the northeastern 
section of Florida, this district comprises a 
portion of south-central Georgia and all of peninsular 
Florida, embracing the watersheds tributary to the 
Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico from, and 
including the harbor at Fernandina, Florida, to and 
including the Aucilla River. It also includes Puerto Rico 
and the U.S. Virgin Islands. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) . . 2 
2. Arecibo Harbor, PR ................ 2 
3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between 
Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ..... 2 
4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL ............ 2 
5. Canaveral Harbor, FL ................ 2 
6. Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass . .. 3 
7. Charlotte Harbor, FL ................. 3 
8. Cross Florida Barge Canal ............ 4 
9. Eau Gallie Harbor, FL ................ 4 
10. Fernandina Harbor, FL .............. 4 
11. Fort Myers Beach, FL ................. 5 
12. Fort Pierce Harbor, FL ..... . . ...... . 5 
13. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee 
River to Anclote River, FL ............ 5 
14. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to 
M iam i, FL ............. .......... 6 
15. Jacksonville Harbor, FL .............. 6 
16. Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), FL ...... 7 
17. John's Pass, FL .... .............. 8 
18. Longboat Pass, FL . ................ 8 
19. Manatee Harbor, FL ................. 8 
20. Mayaguez Harbor, PR .............. 9 
21. Melbourne Harbor, FL ............... 9 
22. Miami Harbor, FL .................. 9 
23. New Pass, Sarasota, FL ........... . 10 
24. Okeechobee Waterway, FL ............. 10 
25. Oklawaha River, FL .......... ...... 10 
26. Palm Beach Harbor, FL . . . . . . . . . . ... 11 
27. Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL .............. 11 
28. Ponce Harbor, PR ... .............. 11 
29. Port Everglades Harbor, FL .. . . . . . . ... 12 
30. Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable 
Waters in the State of Florida ......... 12 
31. St. Augustine Harbor, FL ... .......... 13 
32. St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake 
Harney, FL ... ........ ........... 13 
33. St. Lucie Inlet, FL ................... 13 
34. San Juan Harbor, PR 14 
35. Tampa Harbor, FL 14 
36. Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance 
and Condition Surveys only were Conducted 
during Period .... ................ 15 
37. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ... . 15 
38. Navigation Work under Special Authorization 15 
Beach Erosion Control 
39. Brevard County, FL 
40. Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control 
and Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project . . 
15 
16 
Beach Erosion Control (cont.) P 
41. Duval County, FL ............... . . 
42. Ft. Pierce Beach, FL 
43. Indian River County, FL ............. 
44. Lee County, FL ................... 
45. Manatee County, FL. 
46. Martin County, FL. 
47. Nassau County, FL ................. 
48. Palm Beach County, FL ............. 
49. Palm Beach Island, FL ............... 
50. Pinellas County, FL ................ 
51. St. Johns County, FL................. 
52. Sarasota County, FL ............... 
53. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control 
Projects . ... . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 
54. Beach Erosion Control Activities under 
Special Authorization ............ . . . 
age 
16 
17 
17 
17 
18 
18 
19 
19 
20 
20 
21 
21 
22 
22 
Flood Control 
55. Central and Southern Florida .......... 22 
56. Dade County, FL .................. 23 
57. Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, FL . . 23 
58. Four River Basins, FL ................ 24 
59. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR ........ 24 
60. Rio De La Plata, PR ................. 25 
61. Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR ................ 25 
62. Inspection of Completed Flood Control 
Projects ......................... 25 
63. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects . . 26 
64. Flood Control Work under Special 
Authorization .................... 26 
General Investigations 
65. Surveys .................... . . . 26 
66. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 26 
67. Continuation of Planning and Engineering . . 26 
68. Advance Engineering and Design . . .. . . . 26 
General Regulatory 
69. Permit Evaluation ............... . . . 
70. Enforcement ...................... 
71. Other Navigation Regs ........... . . . 
Project Modifications 
72. Kissimmee River Restoration ..... . . . . . 
26 
27 
27 
27 
*AII cost and financial statements for projects are 
listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are 
referenced in text and also appear at the end of the 
chapter. 
9-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Navigation 
1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL 
(R&H ACT OF 1965) 
Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, 
connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, 
alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil, and other noxious 
aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary 
streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters 
of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, 
flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife 
conservation, public health, and related purposes, 
including continued research for development of most 
effective and economical control measures in 
cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in 
accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H 
251/89/1. The Water Resource Development Act of 
1986 amended the River and Harbor Act of 1965 
requiring the local sponsor to share 50 percent of 
planning costs and 50 percent of research costs that 
are local in nature. The cost of research that is regional 
or national in scope shall be borne fully by the United 
States. 
Local cooperation. Florida Department of Natural 
Resources holds the United States free from damages 
that may occur from operations performed in connection 
with this project and contributes 50 percent of cost of 
operations. Compliance with requirements of local 
cooperation is on schedule. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
There were 10,456 acres of hyacinth and/or water 
lettuce, 3,399 acres of hydrilla and 202 acres of minor 
plant controlled during the period. Costs incurred for 
engineering and design and construction management 
were $96,684 and $52,889 respectively, and 
$3,654,829 for operations. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the 
Corps and the State of Florida are in progress, water 
hyacinths within Florida are under maintenance control. 
Hydrilla is continuing to spread throughout the state 
and is causing major problems in some areas. 
2. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR 
Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of 
Puerto Rico about 40 miles west of San Juan Harbor. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25668.) 
Previous project. For details see page 504 of 1956 
Annual Report. 
Existing project. The project provides for a channel 25 
feet deep by 400 feet wide, with flare at entrance and 
widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area, and 
a stone breakwater 1,200 feet long. Plane of reference 
is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See 
Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf 688 by 220 feet 
providing a deep water berthing space of approximately 
500 feet, and a 300 by 100 foot transit shed. Facilities 
are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. None. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed 
in 1944. Breakwater was repaired in 1952. Wave action 
has since caused damage. 
3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL 
WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA 
AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL 
(JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) 
Location. That part of Intracoastal Waterway between 
southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, FL, at junction of 
Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St. Johns River, 
FL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11489.) 
Previous project. For details see page 605 of 1938 
Annual Report. 
Existing project. Channel 12, 90 to 1 50 feet wide from 
Fernandina Harbor to St. Johns River, about 22 miles 
long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal 
range is 6 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns 
River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor 
Acts of 1913 (H 898/62/2) and 1938 (H 618/75/3). 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina 
located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along 
this section of the waterway and none are currently 
required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Condition, environmental and operation 
studies costs $13,206. Contract cost for environmental 
dredging was $8,075. Engineering and design and 
construction management costs were $195,469 and 
$18,394 respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed 
in 1941. 
4. BAKERS HAULOVER INLET, FL 
Location. The inlet connects the Intracoastal Waterway 
and the Atlantic Ocean and is located 2 miles north of 
Miami Beach in Dade County, Florida. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for an 
entrance channel 11 by 200 feet, thence 8 by 100 feet 
to the Intracoastal Waterway, and a marina basin 8 by 
200 feet. The length of the project is 1.02 miles. Plane 
of reference is mean low water. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. None. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 
completed in December 1964. 
5. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL 
Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of 
Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the 
entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of 
9-2

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical 
Chart Nos. 11478 and 11484.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
37 foot deep entrance channel and maintenance of the 
44 foot deep Navy channel in the 37 foot channel 
reach; and 35 foot depth turning basin; construction 
and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the 
perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and 
extension of the harbor westward; south entrance jetty 
1,100 feet long and the entrance jetty 1,150 feet long; 
a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near 
the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet 
from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water 
(Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 
11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the 
entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian 
Rivers. (See Table 9-I for Data Relative to Lock.) 
Estimated cost (October 1993 price levels) for 
Canaveral Harbor Deepening project is $4,138,000 
Federal and $5,374,000 non-Federal and project cost 
for Canaveral Harbor Sand Transfer System is 
$23,022,000 Federal and $4,885,000 non-Federal. 
(See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must; provide all 
lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining 
dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from 
damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and 
roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent 
of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of 
constructing roadway; provide public terminal and 
transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in 
berthing facilities. For further details see Senate 
Document 140, 87th Congress, 2nd session. Non- 
Federal contribution for new work is $2,567,441. 
Terminal facilities. Canaveral Harbor has 27 commercial 
waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities consist 
of 1,900 feet of usable berthing space capacity of 
168,000 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities operate 
with 3,760 feet of usable berthing space and 
1,41 3,000 barrels of tank storage. Available warehouse 
storage includes 28,000 square feet of dry storage and 
2,500,000 cubic feet of cold storage. Open storage is 
189 acres. 
Three cruise ship berths totaling 1,400 feet long by 34 
foot depth and three 8,800 square foot cruise terminals 
are also located on the south side. The western cruise 
ship berth is equipped with a roll on/off ramp and is 
adjacent to 20 acres of trailer storage area. 
Hoisting facilities consist of one 45 ton floating crane 
and crawler and mobile cranes, with capacities from 70 
to 200 tons, available from local crane rental services. 
There are 2 waterfront marine repair facilities with the 
nearest drydock facilities located at Port Everglades and 
Jacksonville. Two tugs with ratings of 1,600 and 2,250 
horsepower are also available. There is no rail service 
available at the port. The nearest rail service is the 
Florida East Coast Railway located 9 miles away. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Real estate cost was $1,247. Construction costs 
$10,013,670. Engineering and design and construction 
management costs were $453,171 and $597,338 
respectively. 
Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of lock and 
dam amounted to $269,972 for the fiscal year. 
Operation of service utilities costs $35,469. Condition 
and operation studies cost $36,552. Real estate 
management was $9,051. Project operations 
management cost was $46,889. Lands and damages 
cost $8,003. Contract for lock maintenance cost 
$757,543. Contract for channel and canal maintenance 
$1,663,960. Engineering and design and construction 
management cost $472,218 and $259,622 
respectively. Unapplied advances for accrued cost was 
$62. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract for the jetty 
extension and sand-tightening was awarded in June 
1994 was completed in September 1995. Sand bypass 
contract was awarded in November 1994 completed in 
May 1995. 
6. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG 
MARCO PASS, FL 
Location. Naples Bay is on the southwestern side of 
the Florida peninsula about 35 miles south of the mouth 
of the Caloosahatchee River and approximately 1 mile 
inland and parallel to the Gulf of Mexico coastline. (See 
NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11430.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for an 
interior channel 6 by 70 feet from Naples to Big Marco 
Pass; a channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf of Mexico 
to Gordon Pass, thence 10 by 100-70 feet to a 10 foot 
depth turning basin in the upper Naples Bay; and an 8 
foot depth turning basin at the municipal yacht basin. 
Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range 
is 2.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
For further details see Annual Report of 1962. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 
Contributed funds for new work were $159,975. 
Terminal facilities. Four seafood packing houses; 4 
marine repair yards; a municipal pier and basin for use 
by recreational boats; and numerous private piers and 
slips for both commercial and recreational craft are 
available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Project and condition studies cost $1,103. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 
7. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL 
Location. The Harbor is located on the west coast of 
Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa 
Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart No. 11429.) 
Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 
Annual Report. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
channel 32 by 300 feet, increased to 700 feet at the 
bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande to 
and including a turning basin at 200 feet square at the 
municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference 
9-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles 
long. 
Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 
1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet 
at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. 
Strong southwesterly winds raise water levels about 
1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower 
water levels about one foot. (See Table 9-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied 
with to date. 
Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a 
phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal 
earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda, both 
open to the public. Railway connections are available at 
Port Boca Grande, and highway and railway connections 
are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at 
Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker 
fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area 
for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are 
considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition, environmental and operation studies cost 
$39,717. Lands and damages cost was $316. 
Engineering and design and construction management 
costs were $126,838 and -$257 respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 
completed in 1959. (See Table 9-A for total project 
costs.) In addition, $15,563 was expended from 
contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande 
entrance channel. 
8. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL 
Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns 
River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the 
Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and 
down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf 
of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum 
bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth 
dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns 
River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9-J for Locks and 
Dams.) 
WRDA 92 authorizes and directs ASA(CW) to offer to 
enter into a contract to operate and maintain the project 
at a level necessary to ensure safe operating conditions 
and to prevent deterioration of the structures. (See 
Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands 
and rights-of-way for construction of canal; hold the 
United States free from damages; and operate and 
maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in 
connection with project. 
Terminal facilities. None. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
(See Table 9-K for work accomplished.) 
Regulation. 
a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period, the lake 
continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, NGVD by 
discharging through the Rodman spillway. 
b. Lake Rousseau. During the period, the lake 
continued to be regulated at 27.5 feet, NGVD by 
discharging through the Inglis Main and Bypass 
Spillways. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project 
commenced February 25, 1964, and is 36 percent 
completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman 
Dam and Spillway; Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; 
Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake 
Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of 
Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. 
Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 
1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and 
environmental impact statement were completed in 
February 1977. 
Project was deauthorized in Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) and 
$5,000,000 of prior appropriations were withdrawn. 
9. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL 
Location. The Harbor is located on Indian River about 
midway of the State of Florida, 176 miles south of 
Jacksonville Harbor and 174 miles north of Miami 
Harbor. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to and 
including a 300 by 600 foot turning basin in Eau Gallie. 
The project is about 2,700 feet long. Plane of reference 
is mean low water. The harbor is almost nontidal. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. A privately owned boatyard in Eau 
Gallie Harbor provides more than 600 feet of docking 
space used chiefly by pleasure boats. There are also 2 
marine railways and repair and storage facilities 
available. The facilities are considered adequate for the 
present needs of navigation. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition survey cost was $16,974. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 
completed in 1939. In December 1982, the controlling 
depth of the channel was 5 feet. 
10. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL 
Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the 
northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the 
entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles 
north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11 503.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
32 foot depth channel (maximum channel in active 
status: 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep 
water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek 
with Amelia River; an 800 foot wide turning basin at 
the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and 2 jetties, 
19,150 and 11,200 feet long. The project is 7 miles 
long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal 
range is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner 
9-4

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- 
Federal contribution for new work was $935,000. 
Terminal facilities. There are 2 large wharves operated 
by industrial plants; 12 wharves serving fishing boats, 
recreational craft, and other vessels; 3 oil handling 
wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marina and 
Sportsman's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. 
Total berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most 
terminals are served by rail, and all have highway 
access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (See Port Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition, environmental and operation studies cost 
$198,305. Real estate management cost was $1,038. 
Lands and damages cost was $2,447. Engineering and 
design and construction management cost was 
$154,254 and $52,056 respectively. Maintenance 
dredging by contract was $1,379,968. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of 
the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor 
condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining 
work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning 
basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 
1950 authorization is reactivated. The entrance channel 
has been deepened to 46 feet for the Kings Bay project. 
Authorized depths were restored as of March 1991. 
11. FORT MYERS BEACH, FL 
Location. Fort Myers Beach is on Estero Island near 
the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, about 20 miles 
below Fort Myers and 110 miles south of Tampa, 
Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11427.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
channel 12 by 150 feet from that depth in San Carlos 
Bay into Matanzas Pass, thence 11 by 125 feet in 
Matanzas Pass to and including a turning basin 2,000 
feet upstream from the upper shrimp terminals. Plane of 
reference is mean low water. Project is 2.5 miles long. 
Mean tidal range is 1.7 feet. Spring range is about 
2.3 feet. Strong northerly winds lower the water 
surface 1 to 2 feet; strong southerly winds have an 
opposite effect. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing 
Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. There are 3 shrimp-packing houses 
and several fish-packing houses, 2 marine railways, a 
fuel terminal and an ice manufacturing plant in the area. 
There are several commercial facilities for servicing 
shrimp boats. Recreational craft facilities include 9 
marinas, a boat motor testing laboratory which is 
closed, and numerous privately owned piers and 
wharves. All terminals have highway access. Facilities 
are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Project condition survey cost $19,738. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 
12. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL 
Location. On east coast of Florida, about 218 miles 
south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 
miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart No. 11475.) 
Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27 
foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 
feet at Station 100+00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 
30+00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet 
wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130 +00 
and thence 25 feet deep to and including the turning 
basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties 
and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is 
about 3.5 miles. 
Plan of improvement consists of enlarging the existing 
entrance channel to 400 feet wide and 30 feet deep , 
the interior channel to 250 feet wide and 28 feet deep, 
the existing turning basin to 1,100 feet square and 28 
feet deep, and providing an access channel 1,250 feet 
long, 250 feet wide and 28 feet deep north of the main 
turning basin. 
Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet at the entrance and 0.7 
feet at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing 
Legislation.) 
For further details see 1961 Annual Report. 
Estimated cost of new work (October 1994 price 
levels) $6,696,000 Federal and $2,603,000 non- 
Federal. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- 
Federal contribution for new work was $2,009,574. A 
25% contribution and an additional 10% reimbursement 
over 30 years from locals is required. 
Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 
200 by 300 feet, with bulkhead wharf at inner end, 
affording berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south 
pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. 
Facilities also include a cooling plant, a warehouse and 
a fruit packing house. The north pier is served by 
railway and both piers by highway connections. North 
of the turning basin local interests have provided deepdraft 
berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a 
bulkhead wharf with a depth of 25 feet with ample 
room for open storage and with tank storage for 
petroleum in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate 
for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Construction dredging cost was $3,689,544. 
Engineering and design and construction management 
cost was $266,673 and $213,769 respectively. 
Maintenance: Lands and damages cost $1,930. Real 
estate management cost was $539. Maintenance 
dredging costs were $556,420. Engineering and design 
and construction management cost was -$3,601 and 
$20,538. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. A PCA was executed 
in October 1994. Plans and specifications are underway 
and were submitted for approval in December 1994. 
Construction dredging contract is completed. Mitigation 
contract ongoing and should be completed in May 
1996. 
13. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, 
CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO 
9-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
ANCLOTE RIVER, FL 
Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth of 
the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to 
the mouth of Anclote River, Florida, following in general 
an almost continuous series of protected inside 
waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart Nos. 11411, 11425 and 11427.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 
Annual Report. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to 
Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Caseys 
Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point 
Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay 
past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of 
bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties built at Caseys 
Pass under previous project; and improvement and 
maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Plane of 
reference is mean low water. The project includes about 
160 miles of channels. 
Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, 1 
foot at Port Boca Grande, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at 
Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. 
Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, 
about 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grande and Corey 
Causeway over Boca Ciega Bay, and about 5.5 feet at 
entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the 
area generally raise water levels by 1 to 1.5 feet; 
northerly winds lower water levels by 1 to 2 feet. (See 
Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one 
municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight 
wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal 
island, and 11 privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. 
Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. 
All piers have highway connections. There are 6 
wharves along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small 
privately owned piers and wharves at various points 
along waterway for use by commercial fishing boats 
and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate 
for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys cost $58,876. Real estate audits and 
administration costs were $13,969. Lands and damages 
cost was $8,443. Maintenance of levees and floodwalls 
cost was $30,501. Engineering and design cost was 
$18,376. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is 
complete. A contract to maintain the jetties at Caseys 
Pass was completed in 1983. 
14. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, 
JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL 
Location. The Waterway extends from Jacksonville to 
Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the 
mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general 
an almost continuous series of protected inside 
waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11489, 11485, 11472 
and 11467.) 
Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 
1938 Annual Report. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, 
modified by Chief of Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; 
side channels at Sebastian and Daytona Beach and 
turning basins at Sebastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8 
foot depth, and operation and maintenance of Palm 
Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, 
including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range 
of tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in Indian 
River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of 
Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades 
terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme 
range is about 7 feet at St. Johns River, 1.5 feet at 
Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of 
reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is 
imperceptible at points along waterway distant from 
inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately 
owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points 
along waterway. Terminals with railway connections 
are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm 
Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or 
wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, 
Melbourne, and Vero Beach for handling general freight 
and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna 
Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Fort 
Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. 
Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided 
at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau 
Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort 
Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are 
considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further 
details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 
15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and 
Miami, see Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Operation of service facilities was $64,105. Condition, 
environmental and operation studies cost $49,611. 
Project operations cost was $4,776. Real estate 
management cost $50,582. Lands and damages cost 
was $49,282. Maintenance cost of roads, railroads and 
bridges was $359,294. Utilities, supplies and 
maintenance cost was $1,755. Contract dredging costs 
were $111,763. Engineering and design and 
construction management cost $454,209 and $149,265 
respectively. Income and credits to operations was - 
$7,155 and funds returned to the Treasury was $555. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project as 
modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete. 
(Construction of the channel and turning basin at 
Sebastian, Florida, was deauthorized by W.R.D.A. of 
1988, P.L. 100-676.) (See Table 9-A for total project 
costs.) In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended 
from public works funds for new work. 
15. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL 
Location. The authorized project comprises the lower 
24.9 miles of St. Johns River which empties into the 
Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the 
9-6

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 
11491.) 
Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual 
Report, 1938. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
channel 38 feet deep by 400-1,200 feet wide from 
ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 
34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep 
to the FEC railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 
30 foot channel in Arlington cut in the old Dames Point- 
Fulton channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40 
foot depth entrance channel; widening of channel by 
100 feet near mile 5 and by 200 feet near mile 7; 
maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; construction 
of training walls and revetments; a navigation and 
floodway channel 26 by 200 feet along south side of 
Commodore Point; on approach and mooring basin 20 
feet deep, 1,300 feet long at 20 foot depth contour and 
600 feet long at pierhead line near Naval Reserve 
Armory in south Jacksonville; a depth of 24 feet 
between that depth contour and the pierhead line from 
Hogan Creek to the foot of Laura Street; and a depth of 
28 feet to within 60 feet of pierhead line between foot 
of Laura Street and St. Elmo W. Acosta (formerly Upper 
State) bridge. Length of project is about 26.8 miles. In 
addition the Navy has provided funds for a deeper 
Jacksonville Harbor entrance channel 42 feet deep and 
800 feet long, intersecting with the Navy's Mayport 
entrance channel to the Mayport turning basin; also an 
extension of the existing project to provide 38 foot 
depth for the Navy fuel depot, at Drummond Creek. 
Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at 
Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and 1.1 feet at 
Jacksonville. The extreme range varies from about 9 
feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville. Strong 
northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at 
Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds 
lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and one foot 
at Jacksonville. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing 
Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied 
with requirements of local cooperation for work 
performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 
River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to 
contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus 
supervision and administration for work provided by the 
Corps; provide all lands and rights-of-way; save the 
United States free from damages; and provide and 
maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. 
Assurances of local cooperation for this work were 
accepted February 11, 1966. Non-Federal contribution 
for new work was $927,654. 
Terminal facilities. Jacksonville Harbor has 84 
waterfront facilities. Available at the General Cargo 
Facilities are 11,140 feet of usable berthing space and 
1 2 transit sheds with a total storage space of 
1 ,009,800 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities 
consist of 7,843 feet of usable berthing space and 179 
storage tanks providing a total of 8,478,900 barrels of 
tank storage. Warehouse storage at the port includes 
3,266,900 square feet of dry storage and 4,071,100 
cubic feet of cold storage. Available open storage is 
233 acres. 
Four fixed cranes with capacities from 40 to 100 tons 
are located at the port. Available locally are crawler and 
truck cranes with capacities up to 100 tons. Various 
phases of marine repair work are accomplished by 7 
waterfront repair facilities and numerous other 
companies located offwater. Drydock facilities consist 
of 6 floating drydocks with capacities from 800 to 
33,000 tons. Floating equipment includes 25 tugs with 
up to 3,300 horsepower and 16 tank barges with 
capacities up to 20,700 barrels. Three major railroads 
furnish rail service from port docks to all points outside 
of Jacksonville. Facilities are considered adequate for 
existing commerce (See Port Series No. 15, Rev. 1978.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Operation of service facilities cost was $1,800. 
Condition, environmental and operation studies cost 
$83,682. Real estate management cost $40,460. Lands 
and damages cost was $14,686. Channel and canal 
contract maintenance cost was $3,556,540. 
Engineering and design and construction management 
cost $353,175 and $263,448 respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
modification to the project, authorized by 1965 River 
and Harbor Act, is completed. The north jetty is in fair 
condition and partially submerged at high tide. The 
south jetty was repaired in FY 1985 to prevent further 
damage to the Mayport Naval Station. Revetments and 
retaining walls were in poor condition. Authorized 
project depths were restored as of January 1991. 
(See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, 
$290,013 has been expended from public works funds 
for new work. 
16. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL 
COVE), FL 
Location. The authorized Mill Cove project comprises 
a 6 square mile body of shallow water on the St. Johns 
River approximately 10 miles from the Atlantic Ocean 
near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) 
Previous project. None. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides 
improved flow and circulation through Mill Cove to 
eliminate further shoaling. This large shallow area 
averages about 2 to 4 feet deep, is about 5.5 miles 
long, and varies from 0.5 to 2.0 miles wide. It is 
situated along the St. Johns River near the Dame Point- 
Fulton Cutoff portion of the Jacksonville Harbor 
navigation project. The Mill Cove project includes 
dredging a 650 foot by 3,600 foot flow channel at the 
west end to -12 feet MSL; enlarging the weir opening 
at the eastern end to 1,300 feet wide and -12 feet 
MSL; and instainLg flow diversion features at the west 
and east ends of the cove. 
Mean tidal range is 4.9 feet at entrance, 4.5 feet at 
Mayport, 3.0 feet at Dame Point, and 1.2 feet at 
Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water 
level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong 
southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at 
Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville (See Table 9-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. In conformance with Section 221, 
Public Law 91-611, and prior to commencement of 
construction, the Jacksonville Port Authority, as local 
sponsor, must provide written agreement to the 
following local cooperation requirements: provide 
9-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
without cost to the United States all lands, easements, 
and rights-of-way required for construction and 
subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save 
the United States free from damages that result due to 
construction and maintenance other than damages due 
to the fault or negligence of the United States or its 
contractors; accomplish without cost to the United 
States such utility and other relocations or alterations as 
necessary for construction. 
Terminal facilities. None. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. None. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed 
in 1990. 
17. JOHNS PASS, FL 
Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida 
connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The 
pass is located about 8 miles northwest of lower Tampa 
Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, 
Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) 
Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the Gulf, 
thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 feet to 
the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective 
measures over a frontage of approximately 1,000 linear 
feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. 
Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of 
tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. 
Project was authorized December 2, 1964 by the Chief 
of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and 
Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 River and 
Harbor Act. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair yards 
for recreational craft are in the general vicinity. Facilities 
are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Engineering and design cost was $77,015. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed 
in 1968. Authorized project depths were restored as of 
June 1991. 
18. LONGBOAT PASS, FL 
Location. Longboat Pass is located on the west coast 
of Florida about 11 miles northwest of Sarasota and 23 
miles south of St. Petersburg. Located in Manatee 
County, it is one of several natural inlets connecting 
Sarasota Bay, a tidal estuary, with the Gulf of Mexico. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for an 
entrance channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf to 
Longboat Pass Bridge, thence a channel 10 by 100 feet 
from Longboat Pass Bridge along a north to 
northeasterly alignment to the Intracoastal Waterway to 
Cortez Bridge. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet and the 
maximum tidal range is about 5 feet. Currents are 
predominantly tidal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing 
Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 
1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation 
requirements. Contributed funds for new work were 
$172,324. 
Terminal facilities. From Sarasota north to Tampa Bay 
there are about 28 small craft facilities including 
marinas, boat repair yards, and boat basins along the 
Intracoastal Waterway. Nine of them are located within 
2 miles of Longboat Pass. Numerous private mooring 
piers and wharves also exist in the area. The marina 
and repair facilities appear adequate for the general 
boating needs of the area. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Engineering and design cost was $81,170. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
project is complete. Authorized project depths were 
restored as of June 1991. 
19. MANATEE HARBOR, FL 
Location. The project is located in Manatee County on 
the east side of Tampa Bay 10 miles from the Gulf of 
Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11414.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
maintenance of the existing 40 foot deep draft 
navigation channel and turning basin which extends 
from Tampa Bay Channel to berthing facilities at Port 
Manatee. Also provide initial construction for a widener 
at the northwest end of the Manatee Harbor Channel 
and initial construction to deepen approximately 6.6 
acres adjacent to the southern berthing area to provide 
a larger turning basin. All material from the project will 
be placed on upland sites west and northeast of the 
port slip. 
Estimated cost of new work (October 1995 price 
levels) $18,700,000 Federal and $14,300,000 non- 
Federal. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. A 25 
percent contribution and an additional 10 percent 
reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. 
Non-Federal contribution for new work was $25,000. 
Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Port Manatee 
consist of 675 acres of port operational lands, a ship 
basin 1,500 feet long by 788 feet wide; and an 
approximately 3 mile access channel, with a design 
width of 400 feet, which connects with the Federally 
authorized Tampa Bay Channel. The Manatee project 
was constructed between August 1968 and February 
1970. The required design depth was 40 feet, and the 
dredging contractor was allowed a pay overdepth of 2 
feet. Port Manatee also operates its own terminal 
railroad, which is licensed under the Interstate 
Commerce Commission, and publishes a switching tariff 
as a Class III railroad. It also maintains and operates 2 
switch engines and about 30,000 feet of track which 
connects with the CSX Railroad. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: 
Engineering and design and construction management 
cost was $108,203 and $32,932 respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I contract was 
awarded in August 1995 and is scheduled for 
completion in May 1996. Phase II contract is scheduled 
for award in February 1997. Mitigation contract to be 
awarded in August 1997. Contract award is scheduled 
9-8

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
for award in April 1995. 
20. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR 
Location. The Project is on the west coast of Puerto 
Rico, about 110 miles by water from San Juan Harbor. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25673.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
30 by 1,000 foot approach channel to the deep water 
terminal, decreasing to a 500 foot width opposite the 
westerly end of terminal, thence the same width to the 
easterly end of terminal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing 
Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. A modern deep water terminal is 
located in the northeast section of the harbor consisting 
of a bulkhead wharf about 1,270 feet long with a 
storage transit shed 800 by 60 feet immediately 
shoreward. The Puerto Rico Industrial Development 
Company, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto 
Rico, owns a bulkhead wharf of about 200 feet in line 
with the existing deep water terminal plant located 
within the industrial harbor area. In addition, Bumble 
Bee Packing Company, Inc., owns and operates a dock 
of about 200 feet for docking tuna fish boats. Facilities 
are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. None. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed 
in 1934. 
21. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL 
Location. The project is on Indian River about midway 
of the State of Florida, 179 miles south of Jacksonville 
Harbor and 171 miles north of Miami Harbor. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to a 400 by 
800 foot turning basin in Crane Creek. Project is about 
3,150 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. 
The harbor is almost non-tidal. 
Terminal facilities. The Municipal Marina on the north 
end of the turning basin has a 350 foot steel bulkhead 
with 11 finger piers, each about 40 feet long. There 
are also 2 privately owned storage and repair facilities 
and several privately owned boathouses and docks. The 
facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. None. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 
completed in 1938. As of September 1984 channel 
depths as authorized were available throughout the 
project. 
22. MIAMI HARBOR, FL 
Location. Miami is near the northern end of Biscayne 
Bay, about 71 miles south of the entrance to Palm 
Beach Harbor. Miami River has its source in the 
Everglades and flows southeasterly to enter Biscayne 
Bay at Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11468.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
38 by 500 foot channel from the ocean to the outer 
end of the north jetty, thence 36 by 400 feet through 
the entrance and across Biscayne Bay to and including 
a turning basin at the municipal terminals; a 36 foot 
depth turning basin at Fisher Island; 2 rubblestone 
jetties at the entrance; and a channel 15 feet deep in 
Miami River varying in width from 250 feet at mouth to 
90 feet 5.5 miles inland. Plane of reference is mean low 
water, except for 15 foot channel in Miami River where 
depths are based on flood conditions. Total length of 
the project is about 13 miles. 
Mean tidal variation is 2.5 feet at entrance and 2 feet 
in the bay. Extreme variation is about 4.5 feet at 
entrance and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Strong easterly 
winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet at entrance 
and 1 foot in the bay. Strong westerly winds lower 
water level about 1 foot at entrance and about 0.5 foot 
in the bay. Estimated cost (October 1995 price levels) 
for Miami Harbor Channel is $51,200,000 Federal cost 
and $32,500,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 
1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation 
requirements. Non-Federal contribution for new work 
was $2,300,710. Assurances of local cooperation for 
the 1968 modification to the project were accepted 
December 18, 1968. 
Terminal facilities. There are 91 commercial waterfront 
facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities 
include 21,373 feet of usable berthing space, 13 transit 
sheds with a total capacity of 474,300 square feet, and 
9 freight stations with a total storage capacity of 
270,400 square feet. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 
2,714 feet of usable berthing space and 36 storage 
tanks with a total storage capacity of 744,475 barrels. 
Available sharehouse storage includes dry storage of 
1,450,500 square feet and cold storage of 11,204,000 
cubic feet. There are 117.1 acres of open storage at 
the port. 
Hoisting Facilities located at the port include two 40 
ton cranes and cranes with capacities up to 200 tons 
available through local rental. Twelve waterfront repair 
yards and 2 offwater yards serve the port. Drydock 
facilities available include 7 marine railways and 4 boat 
lifts with haulout capacities ranging from 40 to 1,000 
tons and lifting capacities ranging from 79 to 500 tons. 
Nine tugs, with ratings up to 3,000 horsepower, and 
13 tank barges, with capacities up to 35,000 barrels, 
are also available. Rail Facilities at the port are served 
by the CSX and the Florida East Coast Railway. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Contract cost was $918,644. Engineering 
and design cost $930,991. Construction management 
cost was $1,200. 
Maintenance: Condition, operation and environmental 
studies cost $28,495. Real estate management cost 
was $4,235. Lands and damages cost was $2,497. 
Engineering and design cost $17,654. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract II is underway 
and is scheduled for completion in December 1997. 
9-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
23. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL 
Location. Sarasota Bay is a tidal lagoon along the west 
coast of Florida immediately south of Tampa Bay. New 
Pass is a gulf inlet across the bay from Sarasota, 
Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for an 
entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the 
Gulf of Mexico diminishing to 8 by 100 feet through 
New Pass and extending across Sarasota Bay to the 
Intracoastal Waterway with side channels to, and 
turning basins at, Payne Terminal and city pier. Plane of 
reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.3 
feet in Sarasota Bay; mean spring range is 1.7 feet. 
Project is about 4 miles long. (See Table 9-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. Consist of Payne Terminal, a slip 
200 by 650 feet, and city pier, 400 feet long with 2 
finger piers equipped with adequate facilities at each 
location. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Engineering and design cost was $123,803. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed 
in 1964. Authorized project depths were restored as of 
April 1991. 
24. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL 
Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of 
the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, Lake 
Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Canal, connecting coastal 
waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See 
NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11428.) 
Previous project. For details, see page 785 of 1949 
Annual Report. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
replacing the old locks on the St. Lucie Canal by a 
single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. 
Myers for about 5 miles upstream, thence 8 by 80-100 
feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to 
Miami, near Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; 
operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and maintenance 
of features completed under previous projects as 
follows: a 12 by 200 foot channel from the Gulf of 
Mexico to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Ft. 
Myers with a 10 foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6 by 
80 foot channel along the south shore of Lake 
Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6 by 
60 foot channel in Taylor Creek from the town of 
Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of 
Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) 
For further details see 1962 Annual Report. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted 
to $503,700. 
Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, one 
municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and 
a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River 
near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, 
launching ramp, and a 120 foot wharf on the 
Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile below 
Ortona Lock. There are tie-up dolphins above and below 
all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on 
the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about 
halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and 
about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/municipal 
yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. 
Lucie Canal at Indiantown. 
There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along 
the Caloosahatchee River, St Lucie Canal, and on the 
St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, 
municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum 
products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have 
been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek 
immediately landward of Hurricane Gate No. 6 and 150 
feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has 
been provided on the west side of the creek 
immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The 
installations on Taylor Creek are privately owned, but 
are open to the public. A breakwater protected harbor 
is available at Pahokee. There is a 440 foot marginal 
wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125 foot 
wharf at LaBelle; a 150 foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 
125 foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50 foot wharf at 
Alva; and a 30 foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town 
of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar 
was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near 
Belle Glade. All have highway and/or railway 
connections. Facilities are considered adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 
9-L for work accomplished.) 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 
(The 8 foot depth basin at Stuart was deauthorized by 
W.R.D.A. of 1988, P.L. 100-676.) 
25. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL 
Location. The river has its source in a system of large 
lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and 
flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into 
St. Johns River 22 miles upstream from Palatka. The 
extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake 
Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. 
Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 
Annual Report. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to 
obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg 
and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The 
project length is about 85.7 miles. (See Table 9-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. Several private and public landings 
and boat-launching ramps are located along the river. 
Public recreation craft basins and boat launching ramps 
are near Silver Springs and State Roads 40 and 316 
bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffin at 
Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 
acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through 
Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; 
Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing, 
9-10

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the dam is 
at the Ocklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 
19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Real estate management cost was $1,046. Channel 
maintenance cost $98,752. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 
(A 6 foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to 
the head of Silver Springs Run was deauthorized.) The 
Moss Bluff lock and dam structure was replaced under 
the Four River Basins, Florida flood control project. 
26. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL 
Location. The authorized project is located on the east 
coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance 
to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly 
from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart No. 11472.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for an 
entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner 
channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; 
tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference 
is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. 
Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 
feet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range 
of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the 
terminals. Seven foot tidal ranges have occurred during 
storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 
9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. For 
requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. 
Terminal facilities. The port has 13 commercial 
waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities include 
5,156 feet of usable berthing space and 6 transit sheds 
with a total of 118,030 square feet of storage capacity. 
The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 10 storage tanks 
with a total capacity of 2,029,600 barrels. Usable 
berthing space is not available at the Oil Handling 
Facilities. Dry storage is available at 150,500 square 
feet, cold storage at 19,200 cubic feet and open 
storage at 27.1 acres. Seven cranes with capacities 
from 15 to 230 tons are located at the port. There are 
no floating cranes, repair facilities or drydock facilities 
located at the port. A 100 ton vertical boat lift is 
located on the Intracoastal Waterway south of the port 
for heavy lifts. Two tugs with ratings of 900 and 1,000 
horsepower are available. The Palm Beach Belt Line 
which connects with the Florida East Coast Railway 
serves the port. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (See Port Series No.16, Rev. 1982.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition, operation and environmental studies for the 
project totaled $9,480. Real estate management cost 
$3,200. Lands and damages cost was $7,387. Channel 
maintenance cost $1,954,447. Engineering and design 
and construction management cost $247,640 and 
$95,534 respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 
completed in 1967. Jetties and revetment are in need 
of repair. The south jetty was completed in FY 1986. 
Authorized project depths were restored as of 
November 1990. 
27. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL 
Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast 
of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor 
and 57 miles north of Canaveral Harbor. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart No. 11485.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for an 
entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, 
thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the 
inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 
100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, 
each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean 
jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 
2,700 feet long respectively, and weir in the north jetty 
with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of 
reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 
feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet, the 
project is about 5 miles long. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- 
Federal contribution for new work was $2,415,600. 
Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys cost was $2,298. Real estate 
management and audits cost $4,686. Lands and 
damages cost $750. Engineering and design cost 
$40,213. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
project is complete. Repair of the north jetty was 
completed in FY 1986. Authorized project depths were 
restored as of January 1990. 
28. PONCE HARBOR, PR 
Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway 
on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of 
the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25677.) 
Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual 
Report for 1975. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
seawall 362 feet long extending northwesterly across 
the rock reef from near the landward end of the 
municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 
acres; a breakwater 2,400 feet long extending 
southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a channel 36 feet 
deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean 
Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a 
channel 400 feet wide by 36 feet deep into the harbor, 
and a 36 foot deep, irregularly shaped turning basin 
with a diameter of 959 feet. Plane of reference is mean 
low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies 
between about 1 foot below and 2 feet above mean 
low water. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements 
and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense 
depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold 
United States free from any damages resulting from 
construction and maintenance of the project; relocate 
without cost to the United States all cables, sewer 
mains, water supply, drainage and other utility 
9-1 1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
installations as required; provide adequate public 
terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal 
terms. A letter has been received from mayor of Ponce, 
assuring compliance with local requirements and to cost 
share the project. Non-Federal contribution for new 
work was $717,304. A 25 percent contribution is 
required and an additional 10 percent reimbursement 
over 30 years from locals. 
Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and 
operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce 
Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long 
and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 3,811 feet 
long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of 
freight. A 40 ton container lift shore crane is available 
for the handling of loaded containers. The municipal 
pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The 
bulkhead wharf has 4 steel transit sheds totaling over 
103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel 
warehouses are available providing 800,000 square feet 
for general storage. Open storage areas for structural 
steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities 
are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded 
into cement cargo ships by the use of a private pipeline 
loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning 
factory is located on the premises, with direct access to 
the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the 
public. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. None. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
project is complete. South and north jetties are in fair 
condition. 
29. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL 
Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida 
about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles 
south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart No. 11470.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for an 
ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an 
ocean bar tapering to 42 by 450 feet between 
rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that 
depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin 
of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 
feet for distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of 
the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 36 
feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths 
of 200 to 150 feet; construction of a south jetty fishing 
walkway; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of 
reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 
miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the 
entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range 
is aibout 4.5 feet with storm tidesr of about 6.5 feet. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work 
completed to date. For work under H 144/93/1, local 
interests must: provide all lands, easements and rightsof 
-way; save United States free from damages; 
accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; 
provide depths in berthing areas and local access 
channels serving the terminals commensurate with 
depths provided in the related project areas; establish 
regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into 
waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection 
of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as 
authorized at time of construction; provide and maintain 
public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 
percent of total first costs of recreational jetty fishing 
facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. 
Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 
authorization have been furnished by the local sponsor. 
Terminal facilities. There are 22 commercial waterfront 
facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities 
include 13,807 feet of usable berthing space, 7 transit 
sheds with a total capacity of 393,870 square feet, and 
6 container yards with space for 3,965 containers. Oil 
Handling Facilities consist of 232 storage tanks with a 
total storage capacity of 9,564,800 barrels. There is no 
usable berthing space located at the Oil Handling 
Facilities. Dry storage is available at 225,000 cubic feet 
and open storage at 100.3 acres. 
Hoisting facilities available from a local firm include 5 
cranes with capacities from 20 to 155 tons. No floating 
cranes or derricks for heavy lifts are available at the 
port. There are 2 marine repair yards. Drydock facilities 
include 2 drydocks with capacities of 2,200 and 3,200 
tons and a 4,270 ton vertical boat lift. Three tugs with 
ratings up to 4,290 horsepower serve the port. The Port 
Everglades Belt Line connects with the CSX railroad to 
serve the port. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Lands and damages cost was $10,031. Maintenance: 
Condition survey cost was $279. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to 
complete the project is construction authorized in H 
144/93/1. 
30. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH 
FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN 
THE STATE OF FLORIDA. 
Location. Water hyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce are 
found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts 
of the district. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable 
waters of the State so far as they constitute an 
obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any 
mechanical, chemical or other means not injurious to 
cattle, and use of log booms to close sloughs and 
backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the 
final cost of work has been made. (See Table 9-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) 
For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Operations continued during the year. (See Table 9-B 
for Authorizing Legislation and Table 9-M for spraying 
operations.) 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is for 
maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 
24,556 acres of floating vegetation (water hyacinth 
9-12

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
and/or water lettuce), and 2,136 acres of hydrilla were 
controlled in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. 
Hyacinth in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River 
Watershed is under maintenance control. 
31. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL 
Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, 
about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River 
and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See 
NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) 
Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual 
Report for 1958. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
channel 16 by 200 feet along the best natural new inlet 
bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; 
a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending 
seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sandtight 
jetty on the south side of the channel extending 
seaward from the shore of Conch Island parallel to and 
coextensive with the groin; future landward extension 
of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in 
San Sebastian River from the Intracoastal Waterway to 
King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper 
end. Length of the inlet channel is about 1.5 miles, and 
length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 
miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean 
tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine 
Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong 
northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water 
surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing 
Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. There are several timber docks on 
the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area 
of the harbor is a concrete dock which serves as a 
municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and 
accommodates boats up to 60 feet in length. A large 
public boat ramp is also available. The principal 
terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San 
Sebastian River which flows southward through the city 
into the Matanzas River south of the bridge. These 
consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated 
iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for 
small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and 
several boat yards. The present terminals have highway 
connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail 
connections. They are considered adequate for existing 
commerce and recreational craft. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Engineering and design cost was $246,065. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete 
except for the North Jetty which is in a deferred status. 
The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet 
which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean 
low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is 
submerged at high tide. 
32. ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, 
JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE 
HARNEY 
Location. Rises in marshes of Brevard County, Florida, 
near east coast, and flows northwesterly to 
Jacksonville, thence easterly into the Atlantic Ocean, 
122 miles south of Savannah River. River is about 285 
miles long, of which 161.5 miles are included in project. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11492.) 
Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts 
of June 14, 1880 and July 5, 1884. For further details 
see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. 
Existing project. Channel is 13 by 200 feet from Florida 
East Coast Railway bridge at Jacksonville to Palatka, 
thence 12 by 100 feet to Sanford, and thence 5 by 100 
feet to Lake Harney, with side channel to Enterprise and 
maintenance of two jetties. 
Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor 
Acts of March 2, 1945 (H 445/78/2) and July 24, 
1946 (SD 208/79/2). For further details see Annual 
Report for 1962. 
Terminal facilities. There are 36 piers and wharves 
along project, including municipal piers and wharves at 
Green Cove Springs and Palatka, 12 Navy piers at 
Green Cove Springs, a municipal recreational pier at 
Sanford, and 19 privately owned piers, 5 of which have 
nearby tank storage facilities for petroleum projects. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. None. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion is 
complete. Condition of project as a whole is adequate 
for present needs of navigation. (For more detailed 
information refer to 1963 Annual Report.) 
33. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL 
Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 
19 miles south of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor, 
Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance to Miami 
Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) 
Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual 
Report for 1949. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying 
existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section 
about 500 feet long; excavation of a sand impoundment 
basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; 
construction of a south jetty consisting of a 
rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with a 
walkway for recreational fishing; channel between 
existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 
500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet 
through the inlet, and 7 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal 
Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of 
material to the south beach during each two year 
maintenance period. Total project length is about 1.9 
miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal 
range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about one foot 
on the land side of the inlet. (See Table 9-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 
19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to 
navigation in the combined project, 23.1 percent 
allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of 
construction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 39.8 
percent of the annual maintenance cost allocated to 
navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for 
9-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control 
for periodic beach nourishment and 100 percent of the 
annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach 
erosion control; maintain jetty fishing walkway; agree 
that each 5 years the amount of local cost sharing for 
maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, 
easements, and rights-of-way; hold United States free 
from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities 
and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing 
area and local access and feeder channels 
commensurate with the depths provided in the project; 
accomplish such alterations as required to sewer, water 
supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take 
action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations 
which will protect water quality for the authorized uses 
of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 
1974 modification were signed by the local sponsor on 
August 24, 1978. Non-Federal contribution for new 
work was $3,743,199. 
Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities 
for docking and servicing charter fishing and small 
recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling 
bulk petroleum products and several marinas which 
provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair 
of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and operations studies cost $45,343. Real 
estate management cost $62,337. Maintenance 
dredging cost was $1,736,840. Maintenance of bank 
stabilization, revetments, and dikes cost was $7,711. 
Engineering and design and construction management 
cost was $174,442 and $164,598 respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to 
complete the project is construction authorized in HD 
294/93/1. Authorized project depths were restored as 
of July 1991. 
34. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR 
Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of 
Puerto Rico and about 35 miles from the east end of 
the island and 1,100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25670.) 
Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 
1915, 1916, and 1938. 
Existing project. Modification of the authorized project 
to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet 
and shifting its alinement 350 feet west; deepening 
Anegado and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening 
Graving Dock Channel, the Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto 
Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; 
and deepening Anchorage Area E to 38 feet while 
reducing its size and constructing 6 mooring dolphins 
within its limits. A 1,500 foot long extension to San 
Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project 
and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. Estimated 
cost of new work (October 1995 levels) $44,500,000 
Federal and $17,500,000 non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements 
and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any 
damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas 
and local access and feeder channels; provide 
alterations as required to sewer, water supply, and 
other utility facilities. It is further recommended that 
local interests be reimbursed for work performed by 
them on the project subsequent to project authorization. 
A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent 
reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. 
Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and bulkhead 
wharves in the harbor capable of docking deep-draft 
vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of 
about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and bulkhead wharves 
are on the north shore, 2 piers and a three-level ramp 
facility for roll-on/roll-off operations at Front Graving 
Dock turning basin and channel, 9 at the eastern side 
and 3 at the western side of the Army Terminal basin 
and channel, and 3 on the south shore of San Antonio 
Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately 
owned, 7 are U.S. Government property, and 24 are 
owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty 
piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical crane 
transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a 
special crane for handling loaded containers. Twentyfour 
are open to the general public. Pier No. 6 was 
repaired and improved in 1985. 
There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet of 
berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small 
vessels within the 18 foot draft range. This space is 
also open to the public. In addition, there are 10 piers 
and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of 
berthing space owned and operated by different 
agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not 
open to the public. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Maintenance contract cost was $729,142. Engineering 
and design and construction management cost $3,762 
and $152,762 respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The PED phase was 
completed in September 1995. Revisions to the plans 
and specifications are being accomplished in FY 97. 
Work on the PCA package is pending new construction 
start approval. 
Existing project includes the entrance channel and 
turning basin to Army Terminal which cost $1,543,712 
(this expenditure was made from military appropriations 
and is not included in Table 9-A costs). 
35. TAMPA HARBOR, FL 
Location. Tampa Harbor is in a large natural indentation 
of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast 
of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key 
West and about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola. (See 
NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11413 and 11414.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 
Annual Report. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and 
Tampa; 46 by 700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to 
Mullet Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 
44 by 500 feet in Tampa Bay from Mullet Key Cut to 
Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44 by 500 
feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay 
and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port 
Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the 
9-14

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 
feet in Port Sutton entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in 
Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 
by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 
feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in 
East Bay approach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon 
and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Alafia River; 
9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 
feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater; a 43 
by 200 foot Port Sutton Terminal Channel 3,700 feet 
long; turning basins at Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East 
Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River; 
and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in 
Hillsborough River, a 43 by 200 feet by 3,700 feet long 
in Port Sutton Terminal Channel, and 34 by 300 feet in 
East Bay Channel. (The 46 foot and 44 foot depth 
portions of the project include a 5 foot underkeel 
clearance. Special studies on the project concluded that 
4 feet underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a one foot 
overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, 
resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet 
respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The 
project is about 67 miles long, including 10 miles in 
Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. 
Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the 
bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. 
Extreme range is about 3.8 feet at the lower end of the 
bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds 
raise the water level about 1.5 feet. Strong northerly 
winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the 
water level about 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing 
Legislation.) 
For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. 
Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully 
complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 
Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by 
the River and Harbor Act of 1970, H 401/91/2 and H 
150/91/1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1970 
authorization were approved by the Secretary of the 
Army on January 10, 1973. The LCA for branch 
channels was signed June 20, 1986. An amendment to 
the LCA reflecting cost sharing requirements of WRDA 
of 1986 for section 6 was signed August 31, 1987. 
Non-Federal contribution for new work was 
$1,853,161. A 25 percent contribution and an 
additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years is 
required from locals. 
Terminal facilities. There are 102 commercial 
waterfront facilities serving Tampa Harbor. The General 
Cargo Facilities consist of 7,226 feet of usable berthing 
space and 15 transit sheds with a total of 585,200 
square feet of storage space. The Oil Handling Facilities 
include 16,440 feet of usable berthing space and 316 
storage tanks for a total capacity of 11,610,350 
barrels. Dry storage is available at 1,904,750 square 
feet, cold storage at 14,309,000 cubic feet, and open 
storage at 59.4 acres. There are 2 wharves available for 
coal storage at 750,000 tons total storage and grain 
elevators with a 3,400,000 bushel total capacity. One 
elevator on Ybor Channel has a 1,000,000 bushel 
capacity. 
Hoisting Facilities include 13 cranes, fixed and mobile, 
with capacities from 45 to 150 tons and other crawler 
and mobile cranes available locally. Marine repair yards 
include 9 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other 
offwater companies engaged in various phases of 
marine repair. There are 4 floating and 4 graving docks 
available at the port with capacities ranging from 548 
to 5,400 long tons. Floating equipment includes 24 tugs 
with up to 3,350 horsepower and 4 companies with 
tank barges of capacities up to 14,000 barrels. The 
CSX Railroad serves the port. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (See Port Series No. 17, Rev. 1979.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and operation studies cost $139,306. Real 
estate management cost $2,742. Lands and damages 
cost $664. Maintenance dredging cost -$1,394. 
Engineering and design and construction management 
cost $153,847 and $13,841 respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Alafia River portion of 
feasibility study to be started in FY 96. SOW completed 
for that study. Amendment to existing FCSA on Big 
Bend Channel study submitted for approval in November 
1994 to include Alafia River being revised per 
Washington level comments. Upon approval, 
amendment will be executed. completed in August 
1994 on Big Bend Channel. Revised draft feasibility 
report completed December 1995 on Big Bend Channel. 
Report recommends improvements. 
36. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON 
WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND 
CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY 
WERE CONDUCTED DURING 
PERIOD. 
Total cost was $370,179. 
37. OTHER AUTHORIZED 
NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(See Table 9-C.) 
38. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public 
Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) 
Fiscal year costs for Aquadilla Harbor, PR, $873,628; 
Arroyo Harbor, PR, $1,013; Bayport Harbor, FL, $29; 
Buena Vista, Humacao, PR, -$10,022; Cedar Key Back 
Channel, FI, $3,231; Fernandina Harbor, FL, $233,062; 
Island of Vieques, PR, $534; Limetree Bay, St. Croix, 
VI, $330; Playa de Ponce, PR, $55,551; Port 
Everglades, FL, $9,339; Salt Run,St. Augustine, FL, 
$45,833. 
Snagging and clearing for navigation (Section 3 of 
1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th 
Congress.) 
No costs incurred. 
Beach Erosion Control 
39. BREVARD COUNTY, FL 
Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at 
approximately the midpoint of the peninsula. (See 
NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11484 and 11476.) 
9-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Existing project. The authorization provides for a 
protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet 
wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and 
a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave 
action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape 
Canaveral and 10,600 feet of beach at Indialantic and 
Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the 
restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach 
limited initially to a period of 10 years. Nourishment of 
the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would 
be provided by the authorized sand-transfer plant for 
construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also 
provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores 
for beach erosion control or hurricane protection to be 
accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject 
to their own determination of economic justification. 
The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at 
Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air 
Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base. 
Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. (See Table 9- 
B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 
percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of 
the nourishment cost at Indialantic and Melbourne 
beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide 
lands and rights-of-way; provide, after the first 10 years 
of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored 
beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach during project 
life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore 
upon which the amount of Federal participation is 
based; control water pollution; and hold the United 
States free from damages. Assurances of local 
cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the 
Army on July 9, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for 
new work was $2,262,000. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Engineering and design cost $8,911. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Feasibility effort is 
scheduled to be completed in June 1996. Anticipated 
WRDA 1996 authorization. Date of DE notice May 96. 
40. BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH 
EROSION CONTROL AND 
HILLSBORO INLET, FL 
NAVIGATION PROJECT 
Location. Broward County is on the lower east coast 
of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 
30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet is in the 
northern part of Broward County. (See NOAA Nautical 
Chart No. 11466.) 
Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal 
participation toward cost of a shore restoration and 
protection project and a project to maintain a channel 
adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for 
restoration of a shoreline protection and recreational 
beach at 4 locations generally 100 feet wide with berm 
elevation of 10 feet above mean low water; a 
navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal 
Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro 
Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on 
north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently 
based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestlemounted 
sand-transfer plant, if needed. Navigation 
portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean 
range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is 
mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (October 
1994 price levels) is $38,106,000 Federal and 
$37,239,000 non-Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B 
for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 
percent of the first cost beach restoration in the reach 
between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 
percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 
50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach 
between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 
percent of beach restoration in reach between Port 
Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and 
rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of 
plans and specifications if local interests construct 
beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that 
they will hold the United States free from damages; 
provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf 
at Hillsboro Inlet; establish a public body to cooperate 
financially and to provide and operate local facilities for 
navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership 
of publicly owned shores, and maintain all project works 
except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert 
to the United States if sand-transfer plant is 
constructed). Assurances of local cooperation were 
accepted November 22, 1968. Non-Federal contribution 
for new work was $3,460,990. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Renourishment contract cost was $29,360. Engineering 
and design cost $48,222. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was constructed 
by local interests and is complete. 
41. DUVAL COUNTY, FL 
Location. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 
miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 
16 miles long. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11488.) 
Existing project. Provides for Federal participation 
toward cost of construction with artificial fill, a beach 
60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low 
water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic 
nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 
100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable 
to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the 
other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic 
nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Mean 
tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. 
Estimated cost of new work (October 1995 price 
levels) $139,100,000 Federal and $90,300,000 non- 
Federal. 
Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 
1965 (H 273/89/1). 
Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 
percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly 
owned shores; contribute 44.5 percent of periodic 
nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; 
provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold 
the United states free from damages; control water 
pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain 
continued public ownership of the shore upon which the 
amount of federal participation is based during economic 
life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were 
accepted on November 29, 1973. Non-Federal 
9-16

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
contribution for new work was $13,200,096. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Construction cost was $4,543,482.Engineering and 
design and construction management cost $181,258 
and $298,498 respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract to renourish 
the project was awarded in September 1994 and is 
expected to be completed in October 1995. 
Approximately 1.5 million cubic yards of material from 
a borrow area 7 miles offshore will be placed along 7.5 
miles of shorefront. 
42. FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL 
Location. Fort Pierce Beach Erosion Control Project 
extends 1.3 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet, on the east 
coast of Florida about 120 miles north of Miami. 
Existing project. The project fill was initially completed 
by local interests in 1971, using offshore borrow 
material. Prior to the nourishment, severe shorefront 
recession had destroyed a private residence and 
threatened other residences and a state road. Local 
interests were reimbursed the federal share of the initial 
project construction cost. Federal participation in 
renourishment was authorized for an initial 10-year 
period and subsequently extended five years under the 
discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers until 
1985. The project is also periodically nourished with 
suitable material obtained from operational maintenance 
of the nearby Fort Pierce Harbor federal navigation 
project. The project was renourished in the summer of 
1980. 
A Section 111 project authorized in 1982 provides that 
60 percent of the cost of material required to nourish 
1.2 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet should be reallocated 
to the navigation project. A reevaluation report is being 
conducted to determine whether extension of federal 
participation in cost sharing to 50 years is warranted. 
Estimated cost (October 1995 price levels) is 
$11,700,000 Federal and $12,800,000 non-Federal. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Engineering and design cost was $123,951. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The Section 934 report 
recommending extension of Federal participation was 
approved in June 1995 by ASA(CW). However, current 
Administration policy is to not extend Federal 
participation at this time. Therefore, the district is 
awaiting authority to initiate preparation of plans and 
specifications and execution of a PCA. 
43. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL 
Location. Indian River County is on the east coast of 
Florida, midway between Jacksonville and Miami. The 
authorized project comprises 2.65 miles of beach along 
the ocean shore of Vero Beach and 1.7 miles along the 
Sebastian Inlet State Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
Nos. 11474 and 11476.) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides 
nourishment for 8,870 feet (1.68) miles) of the State 
Park, south of Sebastian inlet. The initial beach fill 
would consist of 202,000 cubic yards of nourishment 
material. An estimated 202,000 cubic yards of periodic 
nourishment at 5-year intervals would be required. The 
Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 65 
percent of this segment. 
The plan also provided for nourishment of 9,180 feet 
(1.74 miles) of Vero Beach. The initial beach fill 
consisted of 572,000 cubic yards of material, including 
advance nourishment. The restored beach would have 
a 20 foot wide level berm at an elevation of 15 feet 
above mean low water. The beach fill as designed 
would provide protection against a 10 year return 
interval storm. An estimated 120,000 cubic yards of 
periodic nourishment would be required at 5 year 
intervals. In addition to the beach fill a "Sabecon" reef 
breakwater was recommended. The structure would be 
placed 500 feet offshore of the new beach and would 
be 400 feet in length, with a zero mean low water crest 
elevation. The Federal share of the first cost was 
estimated to be 43.7 percent for this segment. 
The project was authorized on November 17, 1986 
(Public Law 99-662) by the 1986 Water Resource 
Development Act. 
Local cooperation. The authorization of a beach erosion 
control project for Indian River County, Florida was 
made with the provision that the State and local 
interests will, in addition to the general requirements, 
agree to comply with the following requirements: 
provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of 
way; including borrow areas and disposal areas for 
excavated material, and relocations; hold and save the 
United States free from claims for damages; assure 
continued conditions of public ownership and public use 
of the shore; assure maintenance and repair during the 
economic life of the project; provide and maintain as 
necessary access roads, parking areas and other public 
use facilities; provide a cash contribution for periodic 
nourishments for the life of the project; provide an 
additional cash contribution for the Sebastian Inlet State 
Park Beach. The project, as authorized, provides that 
the work may be accomplished in separate units or 
features and that the written agreement with non- 
Federal interests be obtained. The Indian River County 
Board of Commissioners, by letters dated December 21, 
1984 and January 15, 1987, affirmed their support for 
the project and their willingness and ability to share in 
project costs. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Engineering and design cost was $360. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. No work is currently 
scheduled. 
44. LEE COUNTY, FL 
Location. Lee County is on the lower Gulf coast of 
Florida, about 90 miles south of the entrance to Tampa 
Bay and 130 miles north of Key West. 
Existing project. The project provides for the Federal 
participation in restoration and protection of Lee 
County, Florida, as follows: On Gasparilla Island, restore 
beach along 2.7 miles of shore and provide revetment 
along 2,400 feet of shore and a 500-foot terminal groin; 
on Captiva Island, restore beach along 4.7 miles of 
shore; and on Estero Island, restore beach along 4.6 
and provide a 5-year advance supply of beach 
nourishment material and periodic nourishment of the 
restored beaches, as needed, with Federal aid for 
9-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
nourishment limited to the first 10 years of project life 
after completion of the initial fill placement on each 
island. 
Estimated cost (October 1995 price levels) is 
$8,200,000 Federal cost and $29,700,000 non-Federal 
cost. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local Cooperation. Local interest must: contribute in 
cash )including contract price, engineering and design, 
and supervision and administration) 65.8 percent of first 
cost at Gasparilla Island, 91.3 percent of first cost at 
Captiva Island, and 87.5 percent of first coast at Estero 
Island; contribute toward beach nourishment for the 
first 10 years of project life, 95.5 percent for Gasparilla 
Island; 91.3 percent for Captiva Island, and 96.9 
percent for Estero Island; and contribute 50.9 percent 
of the annual maintenance costs of the terminal groin 
on Estero Island; provide after 10 years of project life 
periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; provide 
lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations; assure 
continued public ownership for public use of the shore 
upon which the amount of Federal participation is 
based; control water pollution; save the United States 
free from damages; and provide an adequate width of 
beach with acceptable access and other facilities 
necessary for public use. 
Operations during the year. New work: Construction 
contract cost was $1,792,942. Engineering and design 
cost -$1,343,925. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. A GRR was initiated in 
FY 95 for Estero and Gasparilla Islands. The review of 
a design memorandum for the local renourishment of 
Captiva Island in FY 96 is underway. Reimbursement of 
this work will require the negotiation of another Section 
215 agreement for the balance of the $3 million ceiling, 
or negotiation of an agreement under the authority of 
Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992. 
45. MANATEE COUNTY, FL 
Location. Manatee County is on the west coast of 
Florida, just south of the entrance to Tampa Bay. The 
county's 14 mile gulf shoreline consists of 2 barrier 
islands, Anna Maria Key and the northern half of 
Longboat Key, separated from the mainland by Tampa 
and Sarasota Bays and from each other by Longboat 
Pass. Project consists of about 7.5 miles of gulf 
shoreline. 
Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the 
shore protection project for Manatee County which 
includes the entire 7.5 mile gulf shoreline of Anna Maria 
Key. The project consists of restoration of 3.2 miles of 
gulf shore beach to an elevation 6 feet above mean low 
water with a level berm 50 feet wide and a natural 
slope seaward as would be shaped by wave action. The 
project also provides for periodic nourishment of the 
restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be 
and justified for the project life. Mean tidal range is 2.3 
feet. 
Estimated cost (October 1994 price levels) is 
$24,515,000 Federal and $20,199,000 non-Federal. 
(See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore 
protection project for Manatee County, Florida was 
made with the provision that Federal cost sharing would 
be in accordance with policy established by existing 
law, and the percentages based on conditions of shore 
ownership and use existing at the time of construction: 
Provided that, prior to construction, local interests 
furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the 
Army that they will: (a) Provide without cost to the 
United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, 
including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for 
construction of the improvements; (b) Provide a cash 
contribution equal to 47 percent of the first cost of 
construction, subject to any credit for eligible 
construction costs incurred by local interests, and 
exclusive of costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
relocations, and alterations, and exclusive of the cost of 
fill placed behind the Corps construction line, the final 
percentage to be based on shore ownership and use 
existing at the time of construction; (c) Provide all costs 
of construction for nourishment landward of the Corps 
construction line; (d) Provide a cash contribution for 
periodic nourishment equal to 41 percent of the cost of 
each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to 
each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to 
be based on shore ownership and use existing at the 
time of construction; (e) Hold and save the United 
States free from damage due to the construction works, 
except for damages due to the fault or negligence of 
the United States or its contractors; (f) Assure 
continued public ownership and administration of the 
shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is 
based; (g) Provide without cost to the United States 
appropriate access and facilities, including parking and 
sanitation, necessary for realization of the public 
benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) 
Adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, 
to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) 
Control water pollution to the extent necessary to 
safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) Agree to pay 
100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and 
replacement and rehabilitations costs of the project, or 
functional element thereof. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Beach nourishment contract cost was $1,048,232. 
Engineering and design and construction management 
cost was $34,187 and -$94 respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. No new work 
scheduled. 
46. MARTIN COUNTY, FL 
Location. Martin County is located on the east coast 
of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 
miles north of Miami. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing 
Legislation.) 
Existing project. The recommended plan of improvement 
for Martin County provides for restoration of a 
protective beach along 3.75 miles of shoreline. The 
plan includes restoration of the primary dune as needed 
and a 35 foot wide protective berm. The recommended 
plan was designed to reduce environmental impacts. Of 
primary importance is the impact of project construction 
on sea turtle nesting. In order to avoid these impacts, 
project construction has to occur between November 
1st and April 15th. Only one island segment is 
authorized for this project which is located on 
Hutchinson Island in Martin County. The project begins 
at the St. Lucie/Martin County line and proceeds south 
4 miles. The actual project to be constructed is 3.75 
9-18

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
miles. The project was shortened 0.25 miles to avoid 
impacting sensitive hardgrounds. The borrow area is 
approximately 3,000 feet offshore of the southern end 
of the project area. Estimated cost of new work 
(October 1995 price levels) is $26,000,000 Federal and 
$29,900,000 non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. Martin County Board of 
Commissioners is the local sponsor. Non-Federal funds 
will be requested from the sponsor following execution 
of the PCA. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: 
Engineering and design cost was $174,576. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
project is currently underway with completion to occur 
April 15, 1996. In accordance with the GDM and EA as 
well as the State of Florida Department of 
Environmental Protection permit (WQC), postconstruction 
monitoring will occur. This monitoring is 
for project performance, sea turtles, and adjacent hard 
grounds. 
47. NASSAU COUNTY, FL 
Location. Nassau County is on the east coast of 
Florida, north of Jacksonville and adjoins the state of 
Georgia. The authorized project comprises 4.3 miles of 
beach along the ocean shore of northern Amelia Island, 
and tightening 1,500 feet of the shoreward end of the 
existing south jetty at the entrance to Fernandina 
Harbor. 
Existing project. The authorized project would provide 
initial restoration of 3.6 miles of eroded beach, starting 
at a point about .7 mile south of the Fernandina Harbor 
south jetty and extending south to Sadler Road; sand 
tightening about 1,500 feet of the shoreward end of the 
south jetty; and periodic nourishment of 4.3 miles of 
shore between the south jetty and Sadler Road. The 
restored beach would have a 20 foot wide level berm at 
an elevation of 13 feet above mean low water. The 
initial beach fill would consist of an estimated 
1,100,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An 
estimated 240,000 cubic yards of nourishment at 2- 
year intervals would be required. Sand tightening would 
require about 16,700 tons of stone. The Federal share 
of the first cost was estimated to be 77%. (Sand 
tightening, accomplished as part of the Navy's effort to 
deepen and widen the navigation channel, was deleted 
from the plan.) 
Estimated cost of new work (October 1995 price levels) 
$11,622,000 Federal and $3,121,000 non-Federal 
contributed funds. 
Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore 
protection project for Nassau County, Florida was made 
with the provision that the State and local interests will, 
in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply 
with the following requirements: provide without cost 
to the United States all necessary lands, easements, 
and rights-of-way , including borrow areas and disposal 
areas for excavated material and relocations required for 
construction of the project, including that required for 
periodic nourishment; hold and save the United States 
free from claims for damages which may result from 
construction and subsequent maintenance, operation 
and public use of the project, except damages due to 
the fault or negligence of the United States or its 
contractors; assure continued conditions of public 
ownership and public use of the shore upon which the 
amount of Federal participation is based during the 
useful life of the project; assure maintenance and repair 
during the useful life of the project as required to serve 
the project's intended purpose; provide and maintain 
clearly marked beach access, nearby parking areas, and 
other public use facilities, open to all on equal terms, 
and as required to realize the benefits upon which 
Federal participation is based; provide a cash 
contribution for beach erosion control equal to the 
appropriate percentage of the final construction cost 
allocated to this function, exclusive of lands, 
easements, rights-of-way, alterations, and relocations, 
the percentage to be in accordance with existing law 
and based on shore ownership at the time of 
implementation; provide a cash contribution for periodic 
nourishment during the useful life of the project, such 
contribution to be made prior to each nourishment, with 
the actual amount to be based on existing law and 
conditions of ownership at the time of each 
nourishment; and at least annually inform affected 
interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by 
the project. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Engineering and design cost $282,011. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of the GRR 
has been delayed two years due to Mineral Management 
Service (MMS) impact on currently identified borrow 
area. The District is currently preparing letter to request 
additional funds in FY 96 to locate new borrow area. 
Schedule may slip further if funds are not received in FY 
96. A SACCR is forthcoming. Approval of the GRR is 
anticipated April 1998. 
48. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL 
Location. Palm Beach County is on the east coast of 
Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 
miles north of Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 
11466.) 
Existing project. Project authorization, the River and 
Harbor Act of 1962, provides for Federal participation 
toward the cost of local shore project for restoration of 
beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm 
elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and 
periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of 
initial nourishment, as follows: 62.1 percent of the cost 
for Martin County line-Jupiter Inlet segment; 55.8 
percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet-Lake Worth Inlet 
segment; and 50 percent for south Lake Worth Inlet- 
Delray Beach; and 53 percent of cost for Delray Beach- 
Boca Raton inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 
feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet 
at Boca Raton Inlet. 
Estimated cost (October 1995 price levels) for 
Beach County is $34,100,000 Federal 
$83,300,000 non-Federal cash contributions. 
Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Palm 
and 
(See 
Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to 
the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) 
obtain approval by the Chief of Engineers, prior to 
commencement of work on the project, of detailed 
plans and specifications and arrangements for 
prosecution of the work on the project; (b) provide at 
their own expense all necessary lands, easements, and 
9-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
rights-of-way; (c) furnish assurances satisfactory to the 
Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) assure 
maintenance of the protective measures during their 
economic life as may be required to serve their intended 
purpose, and periodic nourishment of the protective 
beach at suitable intervals; (2) control water pollution to 
the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; 
and (3) maintain continued public ownership of the 
publicly owned shores upon which a part of the 
recommended Federal participation is based and their 
administration for public use during the economic life of 
the project. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Reimbursable contract cost $69,308. Engineering and 
design and construction management cost was $47,761 
and $2,091 respectively. Work-in-kind $12,970. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The sponsor completed 
initial construction of the 1.1 mile initial beach fill at the 
Jupiter/Carlin portion of the project in May 1995. This 
project was authorized for construction by the sponsor 
with subsequent reimbursement of the Federal share of 
eligible costs. Following receipt of financial information 
from the sponsor, an audit will be conducted to 
determine the Federal reimbursement amount. 
49. PALM BEACH ISLAND, FL 
Location. Palm Beach Island is on the east coast of 
Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 
miles north of Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 
11466). 
Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 
authorization provides for Federal participation in the 
costs of a plan for protection of the shore of the Palm 
Beach Island, comprising restoration of a protective 
beach with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean high 
water from Lake Worth Inlet to a point about 1,000 feet 
south of Southern Boulevard extended, thence with a 
general width of 100 feet to South Lake Worth Inlet, 
construction and operation of a sand-transfer plant at 
Lake Worth Inlet, and additional periodic nourishment 
from Lake Worth or other suitable source, substantially 
in accordance with the plan developed by the district 
engineer, with such modifications thereof as may be 
considered advisable by the Chief of Engineers. Federal 
assistance would entail contribution of funds in the 
amount of 4.7 percent of the initial construction cost of 
the beach restoration and appurtenant drainage work, 
and of the expenditures for periodic nourishment from 
Lake Worth for a period of 10 years from the year of 
the initial placement, plus 19.3 percent of the 
expenditures for construction, and for operation, 
maintenance, and current replacements of parts of the 
sand-transfer plant for the same period. Mean tidal 
range is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach 
and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. 
Estimated cost (October 1994 price levels) for Palm 
Beach Island is $13,066,000 Federal and $93,202,000 
non-Federal cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the 
conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) 
obtain approval of the Chief of Engineers, prior to 
commencement of work on the project (except the 
sand-transfer plant already under contract), of detailed 
plans and specifications and arrangements for 
prosecution of the work on the project; (b) make 
appropriate modification of the location of the end of 
the discharge line of the sand-transfer plant to 
accomplish satisfactory dispersion of bypassed material; 
(c) provide at their own expense all necessary lands, 
easements, and rights-of-way; (d) furnish assurances 
satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: 
(1) assure maintenance of the protective measures 
during their economic as may be required to serve their 
intended purpose, and periodic nourishment of the 
protective beach at suitable intervals, including 
operation of the sand-transfer plant; (2) control water 
pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the 
health of bathers; and (3) maintain continued public 
ownership of the publicly owned shores upon which a 
part of the recommended Federal participation is based 
and their administration for public use during the 
economic life of the project. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Engineering and design cost was $12,760. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. No work scheduled. 
50. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL 
Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of 
Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends 
northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to 
Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote 
River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) 
Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual 
Report for 1965. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
Federal participation in preserving and protecting the 
shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 
5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; 
restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; 
restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; 
construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key; and 
advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic 
nourishment of each island. Estimated cost (October 
1995 price levels) is $129,000,000 Federal and 
$96,100,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute 
in cash the required percentages of the first costs of 
work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the 
percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 
94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at 
Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the 
improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the 
improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the 
first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute 
in cash an amount computed in accordance with the 
cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th 
Congress as amended by P.L. 87-874, for beach 
nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project 
life; (c) provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (d) 
assure maintenance and repair of the stone revetment 
of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the 
restored beaches; (f) assure public ownership of 
beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the 
United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach 
for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were 
accepted March 22, 1967. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
9-20

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
Engineering and design and construction management 
cost $904,250 and $21,504 respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Long 
Key (Upham Beach) 3rd renourishment underway. 
Completion is expected to be April 1996. Design 
memorandum for Long Key 4th renourishment, Treasure 
Island 6th renourishment, and Sand Key Phase IV (1st 
renourishment) is underway. At sponsor's request, 
construction of Long Key 4th renourishment and 
Treasure Island 6th renourishment postponed until FY 
98. Construction of Sand Key Phase IV on schedule for 
construction in FY 97. Contract award for Sand Key is 
anticipated December 1996. 
51. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL 
Location. St. John's County is located about 100 miles 
south of the Florida/Georgia border. 
Existing project. The project consists of restoration of 
2.5 miles of shoreline, beginning approximately 2.7 
miles south of St. Augustine Inlet, and including the 
City of St. Augustine Beach. The authorized project 
provides for initial restoration of the beach to a width of 
80 feet + 12 feet elevation relative to mean low water. 
The initial fill would consist of placement of #,580,000 
cubic yards of beach quality sand, includes six years of 
advanced nourishment. The project would replace sand 
lost due to frequent northeasters and provide storm 
protection to upland development. The borrow area is 
located at the ebb tidal shoal south of St. Augustine. 
The project was authorized with a 50 year project life 
from the start of construction. (See Table 9-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) 
Estimated cost is $161,800,000 Federal and 
$30,600,000 Non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. The sponsor of this project is the St. 
John's County Board of Commissioners. Cost sharing 
for this project is 76.4 percent Federal and 23.6 percent 
Non-Federal. The cost sharing reflects the higher Federal 
percentage required to mitigate for erosion caused by 
the Federal navigation project at St. Augustine Harbor. 
PCA will be executed following completion and approval 
of the General Reevaluation Report. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Engineering and design cost was $288,178. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The economic update to 
evaluate the economic justification for the project has 
been approved and recommendations were made for 
further design. The General Reevaluation Report is 
currently underway. 
52. SARASOTA COUNTY, FL 
Location. Sarasota County is on the Gulf coast of 
Florida about 30 miles south of Tampa Bay. The 
northern most portion of the project adjoins the 
Manatee County Beach Erosion Control Project on 
Longboat Key. The total project consists of about 5.7 
miles of gulf shoreline on Longboat Key and Venice 
Beach. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
Federal participation in the construction of a protective 
beach 1 2,600 feet long at Long boat Key and a 
protective beach 29,400 feet long at Manasota Key at 
the City of Venice, Florida. Two borrow areas will be 
required. The first is located within 2 shoal areas 
located between 1 to 2 miles offshore of Manasota Key 
south of the project area. This borrow area will be 
. supplemented by material located within the ebb tidal 
shoal of Big Sarasota Pass which is about 13 nautical 
miles north of the project beach at Venice. The project 
also provides periodic nourishment of the restored beach 
and such adjacent shoreline as may be needed and 
justified for life of the project. The mean tidal range is 
2.1 feet. 
Estimated cost (October 1994 price levels) is 
$31,291,000 Federal and $18,956,000 non-Federal. 
The Federal share of each periodic nourishment is 72.55 
percent for Venice, and 15.4 percent for Longboat, of 
applicable nourishment costs. 
Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to 
the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) 
provide without cost to the United States all lands, 
easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, 
and relocations necessary for construction of the 
improvements; (b)provide a cash contribution equal to 
29.3 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to 
any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by 
local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, 
easements, and rights-of-way, relocations, and 
alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed 
behind the Erosion Control Line (ECL), the final 
percentage to be based on shore ownership and use 
existing at the time of construction; (c) provide all costs 
of construction for nourishment of private lands and 
share in the costs of construction for public lands 
landward of the Erosion Control Line (ECL); (d) provide 
a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 
29.3 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such 
contribution to be made prior to each nourishment 
operation, and the final percentage to be based on 
shore ownership and use existing at the time of 
construction; (e) hold and save the United States free 
from damage due to the construction works, except for 
damages due to the fault or negligence of the United 
States or its contractors;(f) assure continued public 
ownership and administration of the shore upon which 
the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) provide 
without cost to the United States appropriate access 
and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary 
for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal 
participation is based; (h) adopt appropriate ordinances, 
or provide other means, to insure the intended use of 
the beach fill areas; (i) control water pollution to the 
extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; 
and (j) agrees to pay 100 percent of the operation, 
maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation costs 
of the project, or functional element thereof. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Contract cost was $4,889,958. Engineering and design 
and supervision and administration cost was 
$615,897 and $326,628 respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial construction 
began in July 1994 along 1 .3 miles long the northern 
end of the project. A second contract was awarded in 
August 1995 to complete the remaining 1.9 miles of 
initial fill at Venice Beach. The project was divided into 
two contracts due to concerns about the use of borrow 
area at Big Sarasota Pass by the State of Florida. The 
sponsor has identified an alternative borrow area. 
Coordination is underway to secure the Water Quality 
9-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Permit modification and NEPA documentation. 
51. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH 
EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
Key West, FL; Lido Key, FL; Mullet Key, FL; Virginia 
Key and Key Biscayne, FL were deauthorized January 1, 
1990 by the W.R.D.A. of 1988, P.L. 100-676. (See 
Table 9-D.) 
52. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 
ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, 
Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization) 
Reports incurring costs during the fiscal year were 
Little Talbot Island, FL $50,828; Hwy 187, Pinones, PR 
$81,467. 
Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section III, 
Public Law 90-433, Mitigation of Shore Damages 
Attributable to Navigation Projects. 
No costs were incurred under the above authorization. 
Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline 
Erosion Control Act of 1074, Public Law 93-251. 
No costs were incurred under the above authorization. 
Flood Control 
55. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA 
Location. The project is generally located within the 
southeastern 18 counties of Florida covering an area of 
about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper 
St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of 
project, Kissimmee River basin in central section north 
of the Lake Okeechobee-Everglades area in the central 
and southwestern section, and the east coast 
Everglades area in southeastern section. 
Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake 
Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the 
navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, FL 
(formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee 
drainage area, FL) and under provisions of River and 
Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930 and August 30, 1935. For 
further information, see Annual Reports for 1948 and 
1949. 
Existing project. The authorized project is for flood 
relief and water conservation and provides principally 
for: an east coast protective levee extending from the 
Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake 
Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three 
conservation areas for water impoundment in the 
Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee 
with control structures to effect transfer of water as 
necessary; local protective works along the lower east 
coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural 
area by levees and canals; enlargement of portions of 
Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm 
Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake 
Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on 
the northeast and northwest shores of the lake; 
increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake 
Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River 
basin, with suitable control structures to prevent overdrainage; 
an interrelated system of canals, levees, 
pumping stations, and structures in southwest Dade 
County to control water levels; and facilities for 
regulating floods in Upper St. Johns River basin; a 
system of canals and control structures for gravity 
drainage of Martin County and distribution of available 
water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie 
Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, 
and conservation of water resources in central and 
southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee 
agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other 
related areas. The project will provide water control and 
protection from recurrence of the devastating 
floodwaters from the Everglades and local sources, for 
the highly developed urban area along the lower east 
coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural areas 
around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around the 
lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee River 
basins, and in South Dade County. 
The project includes a total of 990 miles of levees, 
978 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 212 floodway 
control and diversion structures, 56 railroad bridge 
relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. 
The project also provides that upon completion, local 
interests assume operation and maintenance of all 
completed works except levees, channels, locks, and 
control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and 
the main control structures of conservation areas, which 
will be operated and maintained by the United States. 
The principal features of the hurricane gates, 
constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee 
Waterway and maintained under existing project since 
July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-Q. Also, see 
Table 9-N for principal features of locks and dams. 
Estimated cost for new work (October 1995 price 
levels) is $1,366,000,000 Federal and $680,000,000 
Non-Federal, exclusive of river and harbor funds 
expended on previous projects.(See Table 9-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. (See Table 9-R for local cash 
contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, 
rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United 
States free from damages; bear the cost of maintenance 
and operation of all works except those having to do 
with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main 
control structures of conservation areas; construct and 
maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit 
encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the 
improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway 
bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to 
utilities incident to construction of the project. In 
addition, for small boat navigation channels, local 
interests must provide, maintain, and operate adequate 
public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and 
establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants 
into the waters of the locks and channels by users 
thereof. 
Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by 
the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to 
date. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9- 
S for work accomplished.) 
9-22

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
Operations and care. a. Features completed under 
previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway 
and being maintained under this project are: a levee 
about 70 miles long following in general the south shore 
of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles 
long; spillways at Ortona and St. Lucie Locks; 5 
hurricane gates; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. 
b. Features completed under existing project that are 
to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds 
are: (1) Levees 47, 48, 49 and 50 -- total length 63 
miles and enlargement of existing levees L-D1, L-D2, LD3, 
L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S-10, S- 
11, S-12, S-18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Section 4 
(Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W.P. Franklin Lock and 
Dam. 
In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is 
necessary under operation and maintenance to continue 
meteorological studies, water level records, stream 
gaging stations, etc., for proper regulation of the level 
of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in 
Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. 
Corps of Engineers - The Corps of Engineers operates 
and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee 
and Water Conservation Area Nos. 1, 2A and 3A in 
central and southern Florida. 
South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is 
responsible for operation and maintenance of the project 
facilities, including major pumping stations, spillways, 
locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and 
culverts. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of the 
Comprehensive Review Study including Water Preserve 
Areas has been initiated and the PSP for the Indian 
River Lagoon Study is scheduled for completion in May 
1996. Engineering and design is underway for South 
Dade County, Bolles and Cross Canal GRR, C-51 Flood 
Control Project, Lake Istokpoga GRR, Herbert Hoover 
Dike Stability Analysis, East Cape and Homestead Canal 
Plug Repairs, and C-7, 8, and 9 GRR. Construction of 
the Upper St. Johns Project is underway. (For status of 
work under construction at the end of the fiscal year 
see Table 9-P.) 
56. DADE COUNTY, FL 
Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of 
Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic 
shoreline of the county from Government Cut north to 
Bakers Haulover Inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See 
NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) 
Existing project. Project provides for a protective and 
recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet 
and a level berm 50 feet wide at elevation 9 feet, mean 
low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane 
protection between Government Cut and Bakers 
Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with 
a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at 
Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the 
initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both 
the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. 
Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of 
tide in the area is 2.5 feet. 
Estimated cost of the project (October 1995 price 
levels) is $170,400,000 Federal cost and 
$154,600,000 non-Federal cost. 
Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 
(H 335/90/2). 
Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute 
for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut 
and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 
percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit 
with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of 
the cost of fill required landward of the project limit; 
and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 
21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for 
lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and 
preproject work, but including credit for preproject 
work; (b) contribute in cash for the first 10 years of 
project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the 
nourishment cost for the beach, with existing 
ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownership, and 
the entire maintenance cost for dune, all between 
Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide 
all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free 
from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership 
and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal 
participation is based; (f) assure maintenance of the 
groin, and after 10 years of project life, periodic 
nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance 
of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) 
assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) 
prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from the 
beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of 
barriers to the littoral movement of material that would 
interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain 
at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal 
participation a zone that excludes permanent human 
habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected 
that the project will not provide complete protection 
from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in 
elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; 
and (1) establish in public ownership for public use the 
beaches within project limits as a requirement for 
Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion 
control costs of improvement of shores presently in 
private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation were 
accepted January 16, 1973. A supplemental agreement 
for Bal Harbour portion was approved June 30, 1976. 
Non-Federal contribution for new work was 
$31,857,335. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Contract cost $2,370,597. Engineering and design and 
construction management cost $824,253 and $67,143 
respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project sponsor 
desires renourishment of 5 areas of the 13 mile project 
in FY 96. Contract #1 for renourishment of 2 areas was 
terminated in FY 94 due to a temporary Federal 
injunction. Coordination of a NEPA document was 
reinitiated to comply with the Federal judge's desire to 
complete the EA process. This will allow 
readvertisement in the winter of 1995. Contract 2 
which will renourish two additional areas is scheduled 
for summer 1996. A new offshore borrow area is being 
developed for renourishment of the 5th area, scheduled 
for FY 97. Construction of an offshore breakwater at 
Sunny Isles with a transition in the beach fill along 
Golden Beach is scheduled for FY 97. 
57. DADE COUNTY, NORTH OF 
HAULOVER BEACH, FL 
9-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Location. On the southeast coast of Florida. Project 
area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline 
extending 2.5 miles north of Haulover Beach Park. (See 
NOAA Nautical chart No. 11466.) 
Existing project. The existing shore protection project 
for Dade County provides for Federal participation in the 
cost of construction of a beach fill for the purpose of 
erosion control and hurricane protection along 9.3 miles 
of shore between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover 
inlet and for the construction of a beach fill for the 
purpose of erosion control along the 1.2 miles of shore 
fronting Haulover Beach Park and provides for 
protection and nourishment of 2.5 miles of beach shore 
north of Haulover Beach Park and for extension of the 
period of Federal participation from 10 years to the life 
of the project. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing 
Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Consistent with the cost-sharing and 
financing concepts agreed to by the administration and 
Senate Majority Leadership, local interests will be 
required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway 
and relocations; pay 50 percent of the separable 
and joint costs allocated to recreation; pay 35 percent 
of the cost allocated to storm damage prevention; hold 
the United States free from damages; control water 
pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain 
continued public ownership of the shore upon which the 
amount of Federal participation is based during 
economic life of project. Assurances of local 
cooperation have been requested from local sponsors. 
Non-federal contribution for new work was $8,082,927. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. None. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. No new work 
scheduled. 
58. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL 
Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 
6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and 
southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part 
of the four main stream basins -- the Hillsborough, 
Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers -- and all 
of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, 
drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and 
Lake Tarpon. 
Existing project. The authorized project provided for 
improvements for control of floods and drainage, and 
for conservation through construction of necessary 
canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More 
specifically, the project provided for: Green Swamp 
Area -- a conservation area and 3 storage reservoirs 
with necessary canals and control structures; 
Hillsborough River -- 4 flood-storage reservoirs, with 
necessary channels, control structures and levees; 
Oklawaha River -- a levee on the north shore of Lake 
Apopka, improvement of parts of the river channel and 
a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and 
replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River 
-- one flood-storage reservoir with outlet canals and 
control structures; Peace River -- Peace Creek canal and 
control structures and improvements to the existing 
water control and drainage features; Gulf Coastal Areas- 
Lake Tarpon; outlet canal and control structure; 
Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and 
control structures. (See Table 9-T on Moss Bluff Lock.) 
Estimated cost for new work (October 1995 price 
level) is $181,000,000 Federal and $155,500,000 non- 
Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all 
lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or 
replacements of public and private utilities, roads, 
bridges (except railroad bridges), etc.; hold the United 
States free from damages; operate and maintain all 
project works after completion; construct and maintain 
such associated works as are necessary to realize 
benefits made available by the project works; and 
contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of 
construction and 50 percent of recreation costs. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Real estate administration cost $8,018. Recreation 
contract cost was $375,734. Engineering and design 
and construction management cost $159,152 and 
$57,292 respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
project commenced April 18, 1966 and the scheduled 
work is 98 percent complete. Construction is underway 
on recreation. The remaining scheduled work is along 
the Tampa Bypass Canal (C-135). Pending a 
determination of need, 58% of project is 
unprogrammed. 
59. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, 
PR 
(This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, Lago de 
Portugues, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) 
Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the 
southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto 
Rico and flow from this central ridge of the island to the 
Caribbean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22.6 and 31.4 
square miles, respectively. Ponce, the second largest 
city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area 
along Portugues River and is the only urban community 
in the two basins. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 2 
multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water 
supply, general recreation, and fish and wildlife 
enhancement -- one on Portugues River and the other 
on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; 
enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River, 
with an additional 0.2 mile long tieback levee at the 
upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 
2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 
mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the 
improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel 
connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. 
Estimated cost of the project (October 1995 price 
levels) is $416,500,000 Federal and $143,100,000 
non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all 
lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold the United 
States free from damages; operate and maintain all 
project works after completion; repay construction cost 
allocated to water supply in accordance with Water 
Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost 
allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife 
enhancement; prohibit discharge of inadequately treated 
sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and 
prevent encroachment on downstream channels. 
Assurances of local cooperation have not been 
9-24

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
completed, except for Cerrillos Reservoir which was 
signed March 15, 1982. Non-Federal contribution for 
new work was $3,002,087. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Lands and damages cost was $1,240. Construction 
contract for dams cost was $4,648,961. Cost for 
roads, railroads, and bridges was $1,984,304. Cost for 
channels and canals was $2,375,471. Cultural resource 
preservation cost was $41,779. Permanent operating 
equipment cost was $152,905. Engineering and design 
and construction management cost $3,447,540 and 
$820,719 respectively. Engineering during construction 
cost was $19,003. Transfer of property cost $93,775. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Cerrillos Dam filling and 
monitoring operations are underway. Construction of the 
recreation feature will be initiated this year. Portugues 
Dam right abutment foundation contract will be initiated 
in FY 96 and test grouting will be completed. A 
contract for removal of shoals in the Portugues channel 
will also be initiated. 
60. RIO DE LA PLATA, PR 
Location. The Rio de La Plata basin is located about 11 
miles west of the San Juan metropolitan area along the 
north coast of Puerto Rico. The Rio de la Plata basin 
drains an area of 240 square miles through several 
towns and villages into the Atlantic Ocean. 
Existing project. The project was authorized by the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1990. It would 
provide 100 year protection upstream of PR Highway 2 
and SPF protection down stream and calls for 
construction of 7.6 miles of levees. The plan includes 
the replacement of 3 bridges, recreation facilities, and 
mitigation for the loss of environmental habitats. The 
benefit-cost ratio is 1.6. 
Estimated cost (October 1995 price levels) is 
$62,400,000 Federal and $31,500,000 Non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. The project cooperation agreement 
was executed on 7 June 1995. The Commonwealth of 
Puerto Rico, Department of Natural and Environmental 
Resources, is the body authorized to represent the local 
interest and is responsible for complying with the 
following requirements: (1) provide a cash contribution 
equal to five percent of total project costs; (2) provide 
all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and 
dredged material disposal areas; (3) provide an 
additional cash payment when the sum of both items 
(1) and (2) are less than 25 percent of total project 
costs; (4) operate and maintain the project after 
completion, including accomplishment of any needed 
repairs or rehabilitations of any of its components; (5) 
hold and save the United States free from damages due 
to the construction or subsequent maintenance of the 
project, expect due to damages due to the fault or 
negligence of the United States or its contractors; (6) 
prevent future encroachments which might interfere 
with proper functioning of the project; (7) participate in 
and comply with applicable Federal flood plain 
management and flood insurance programs; and (8) (a) 
provide guidance and leadership to prevent unwise 
lfouctualr ec doeovpeelroaptmionen tr eqinu itrheem felnootsd: p(l1a)in ;p raonvdid (eb ) onreec-hreaalft ioonf 
the separable first cost of post authorization planning 
and construction of recreation facilities and provide all 
land required for recreation; and (2) all costs and full 
responsibility for the operation, maintenance, 
replacement, and management of recreation lands and 
facilities. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Lands and damages cost was $47,660. Engineering and 
design cost was $292,339. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Acquisition of real estate 
required for the first construction contract is ongoing. 
Award of first contract is scheduled for October 1997. 
61. RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR 
Location. The Rio Puerto Nuevo drainage basin is 
located within the San Juan Metropolitan Area along the 
northern coast of Puerto Rico. The basin joins the 
southeast side of San Juan Harbor and extends south 
and up into the foothills of the central mountains of 
Puerto Rico. The basin is traversed by the Rio Piedras, 
Rio Puerto Nuevo, Quebrada Margarita, Quebrada 
Josefina, Quebrada Dona Ana, Quebrada Vista, and 
Quebrada Guaracanal. 
Existing project. The authorized project for flood 
control includes improvements to 11.2 miles of the 
existing channel of Rio Puerto Nuevo and Rio Piedras 
and five tributaries of the Rio Puerto Nuevo drainage 
basin. The 25 square mile drainage basin drains into 
San Juan Harbor. Estimated cost of the project (October 
1995 price levels) is $322,100,000 Federal and 
$107,600,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must provide cash 
contribution equal to five percent of the total project 
costs; provide LERRD (except railroad bridge 
alterations);provide an additional cash payment when 
the sum of cash and LERRD are less than 25 percent of 
the total project costs; operate and maintain project 
works after completion; hold and save the United States 
free from damages; prevent future encroachments; 
participate and comply with Federal flood plain 
management and flood insurance programs; provide 
guidance and leadership to prevent unwise future 
development in the flood plain; provide one-half of the 
separable first cost of post authorization planning and 
construction of recreation facilities; and all costs and 
full responsibility for operations, maintenance, 
replacement, and management of the recreation lands 
and facilities. Non-Federal contribution for new work 
was $850,000. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Engineering and design and construction management 
cost was $1,744,558 and 820 respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract No.1 was 
awarded for $30 million and construction is underway. 
Detailed design work continues for Phase No. 2. Award 
of a second contract is planned in November 1997 
when contract No. 1 is completed. 
62. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
FFloeoadt urCeso ntrtraonls feDrirsetdri ctot tahned CeSnotruatlh waneds tS oFultohreidran FWloartiedra 
Management District were inspected quarterly during 
the fiscal year at a total cost of $12,063. 
9-25

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
63. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Table 9-E.) 
64. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public 
Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended 
(preauthorization). 
(See Table 9-V.) 
Emergency flood control activities -- repair, flood 
fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th 
Congress, and antecedent legislation). 
Federal costs for the fiscal year were $502,197 for the 
Disaster Preparedness Program. Emergency Operations 
cost was $513,287. Rehabilitation cost was 
$1,141,814. National Emergency Preparedness Program 
cost was $146,752. 
Emergency streambank and shoreline protection 
activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th 
Congress as amended (preauthorization). 
Federal cost for the fiscal year was Bradenton Beach, 
FL $259,831; and Juan Mendez Channel, PR $49,801. 
General Investigations 
65. SURVEYS 
Hired labor costs during the fiscal year were: 
navigation studies $939,302; flood damage prevention 
studies $1,159,958; shoreline protection studies 
$196,006; special studies $94,603; review of 
authorized projects $127,944; special investigations 
$103,830; and coordination with other agencies and 
non-Federal interests $407,771; for a total cost of 
$3,028,874. 
66. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC 
DATA 
The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain 
information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that 
deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. 
Cedar Keys Hurricane Evacuation $93,781; Florida 
Statewide Evacuation $5,454; FPMS Unit Jacksonville, 
FL $35,955; HES Palm Beach $29; Hurricane 
Evacuation Study VI $9,201; Indian Workshops $8,500; 
Puerto Rico East Coast HES $98,833; Quick Responses 
$7,758; SE Florida HES Reanalysis $1,818; E. Central 
FL - HES $13,262; San Juan HES Update $25,000; 
Seminole TRibal Floodway $35,803; Technical Services 
General $96,317; for a total cost of $431,712. 
67. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND 
ENGINEERING 
Navigation cost was Palm Valley Bridge $583,378. 
Beach erosion cost was Monroe County, FL $27,861. 
Local protection cost was Arecibo River, PR $481,914, 
Rio De La Plata, PR $ 25,194 and Rio Grande De Loiza, 
PR $756,274. Total cost for Continuation of Planning 
and Engineering was $1,874,620. 
68. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
Navigation cost was Miami River Sediments, FL 
$333,753; and San Juan Harbor, PR $375,419. Beach 
erosion control cost was Martin County, FL $172,240; 
Nassau County, FL $282,011 and St. Johns County, FL 
$50,523. Local protection cost for Puerto Nuevo River, 
PR was $547. Total cost for Advance Engineering and 
Design was $1,214,493. 
General Regulatory 
69. PERMIT EVALUATION 
(R&H ACT of 1899; CWA of 1977; 
MPRSA of 1972) 
Location. Navigable waters of the United States, 
including tributary systems, headwaters and isolated 
waters, and ocean waters to the limits of the territorial 
seas. 
Existing Program. The program evaluates permit 
applications for work in navigable waters (dredging, 
filling, and other structures) of the United States, and 
the transportation of dredged material to the oceans for 
ocean disposal. Geographic coverage includes Florida, 
Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Decision 
making criteria consist of the public interest review, 
Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines, and ocean dumping 
criteria. 
Local Cooperation. Joint application agreement with the 
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) 
and the regional Water Management Districts (WMD) 
has been agreed to in principle and will be signed early 
in FY 1996. Some problems are being encountered with 
differing application forms for the WMD's. Have started 
joint processing (team permitting) on selected larger 
applications, which is expected to improve coordination 
amongst agencies and streamline the permitting process 
for the public. Have developed a Programmatic General 
Permit with FDEP, and proposing more PGP's with 
county governments. Expect to expand Florida PGP to 
Statewide by end of calendar year 1996. Have worked 
closely with FDEP on initiating watershed/ecosystem 
management in the State. Regularly scheduled 
interagency meetings helping reduce duplication and 
provide faster feedback to regulated public. Joint 
application booklet with the Virgin Islands Department 
of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) is finished, 
but publication delays encountered by DPNR. Talks 
ongoing with Puerto Rican regulatory agencies about 
developing joint application process. Expect to finalize 
process this FY. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. A total of 
8,769 applications were received during the fiscal year, 
up slightly from 8,071 received in FY 1994. Of these, 
1,470 were individual or letters of permission 
(compared to 1,776 in FY 1994), 2,795 were requests 
for nationwide permit verification (versus 2,351 in FY 
1994), and 4,504 were for regional general permits 
(versus 3,944 in FY 1994). FY 1995 cost for permit 
evaluation was $6,111,619. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. A total of 396 
individual or letters of permission permit applications 
were carried forward into FY 1996. 
9-26

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
70. ENFORCEMENT 
(R&H ACT of 1899; CWA of 1977; 
MPRSA of 1972) 
Existing program. The program takes appropriate 
enforcement action against both unauthorized work 
requiring a permit and noncompliance findings on issued 
permits. Operation of the program is continuing to make 
increased use of alternative dispute resolution processes 
to remediate violations. Close coordination with and 
cooperation of Department of Justice continues, with 
development of consent orders and fines as appropriate. 
Local cooperation. The enforcement agreement with 
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IV 
has been revised and improved to further clarify agency 
roles. Discussions are underway to develop a similar 
agreement with EPA Region II to cover Puerto Rico and 
the Virgin Islands. This should be finished in FY 1996. 
The local operating agreement with FDEP and the 
WMD's contains provisions for cooperative 
enforcement, within the limits of State and Federal law. 
A PGP has been developed with EPA Region IV which 
would authorize fill remaining after EPA (as lead agency) 
complete enforcement actions. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. A total of 72 
unauthorized activities were reported during the fiscal 
year, and 30 noncompliance cases were resolved. 
Compliance inspections were performed on 326 permits, 
highlighting the District's shift in emphasis to 
compliance. Approximately 85 percent were found in 
compliance. Five (5) cases were transferred to the EPA 
under the enforcement MOA. Cost incurred this fiscal 
year for enforcement was $747,209. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Six (6) consent orders 
were finalized after ADR negotiations and entered in 
Federal Court, with total penalties of $426,000; 
restoration of approximately 4 acres of wetlands 
required; NW-32 used for fill placed in approximately 26 
acres; and 210 acres of wetlands preserved as 
compensatory mitigation associated with permit 
violations. These actions assessed a total of $42,500 in 
fines of which $27,500 was successfully collected. 
71. OTHER NAVIGATION REGS 
(R&H Act of 1899) 
Location. Navigable waters of the United States in 
Florida, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. 
Existing program. This program conducts studies to 
determine geographic extent of navigable waters of the 
United States, and establishment of danger or restricted 
zones in these waters. 
Local cooperation. This program is carried out with 
informal cooperation with the State of Florida and 
cooperation of other Department of Defense agencies 
needing restricted zones in which to conduct their 
defense related missions. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. No tributary 
system navigability studies were conducted during the 
fiscal year. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The district has 
conducted 14 navigability studies of State tributary 
systems. State assumption of the Section 404 program 
may occur in the next three years. Additional 
navigability studies will be programmed to help delineate 
nonassumable waters as funds permit. 
Project Modification 
72. KISSIMMEE RIVER, FLORIDA 
Location. The Kissimmee River Basin comprises 3,013 
square miles, and extends from Orlando southward to 
Lake Okeechobee, the second largest freshwater lake in 
the United States. The area is bounded on the north by 
the lakes of the Orlando area, on the west by the Peace 
River Basin, on the south by Lake Okeechobee, and in 
the east by the Upper St. John's and the Taylor Creek- 
Nuddin Slough Basins. The watershed is about 105 
miles long and has a maximum width of 35 miles. 
Existing Project. The purpose of this study is to 
determine the extent of Federal participation in the Level 
II Backfilling Plan, as developed by the South Florida 
Water Management District, for restoration of the 
Kissimmee River and flood plain ecosystem. It is 
expected that restoration will restore the ecological 
integrity of the river system. Environmental 
improvements through modification of operations for 
Lake Kissimmee, Cypress, and Hatchineha. The project 
will include canal and/or structure improvements and 
real estate acquisition. The recommended plan consists 
of backfilling approximately 29 miles of C-38. This will 
result in the restoration of almost 29,000 acres in the 
floodplain. Three structures will be removed and two 
bridges and associated utilities will be relocated. Real 
estate interests will be acquired for effected portions of 
the floodplain. Estimated cost of the project (October 
1995 price level) for Kissimmee River (Upper and Lower 
Basins) $255,600,000 Federal and $414,400,000 non- 
Federal. 
Local Cooperation. The South Florida Water 
Management District, an agency of the State of Florida, 
is the feasibility study cost sharing partner, and has 
expressed its intent to be the project sponsor. Local 
cost for the Headwater Revitalization is to be credited 
towards the total project cost. The authorization calls 
for the restoration to be cost-shared 50%-50% and that 
the lands be credited toward the total cost of the 
Kissimmee River Restoration. A draft Local Cooperation 
Agreement (LCA) has been reviewed by the sponsor and 
a letter of intent has been provided for the Headwaters 
Revitalization. LCA for the River Restoration project is 
scheduled for execution in May 1994. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Engineering and Design cost was $2,663,570. 
Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Engineering and 
design is underway. Preparation of a Project 
Modification Report (FDM scope) for the work in the 
upper basin is ongoing and will contain documentation 
to justify the project on the basis of environmental 
benefits. It was submitted in March 1995. In the lower 
basin portion, feature designs are underway for the 
restoration of the Kissimmee River. Test backfilling to 
verify design criteria and methodology was completed 
in September 1994. 
9-27

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost To 
Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
1. Aquatic Plant 
Control (R&H 
Act of 1965) 
(Federal Funds) 
2. Arecibo Harbor, 
PR 
(Federal Funds) 
3. Atlantic 
Intracoastal 
Waterway 
between 
Norfolk, VA and 
St.Johns River, 
FL 
(Federal Funds) 
4. Bakers Haulover 
Inlet, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
5. Canaveral 
Harbor, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
6. Channel from 
Naples to Big 
Marco Pass, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
7. Charlotte 
Harbor, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
2,180,000 2,523,000 2,569,000 2,604,000 
2,166,960 2,419,492 1,432,302 3,804,402 
38,660,500 
38,465,953 
- 1,128,075 
- 1,128,075' 
- 4,301,431 
- 4.301,431 
9,700 
9,700 
826,300 247,000 744,000 301,301 
826,123 247,944 731,405 308,143 
25,000 
973,477 
3,887,000 
3,878,661 
4,500 
14,530 
1,204,000 
517,232 
3,080,000 
3,086,700 
235,000 
1,795 
69,000 508,000 
60,472 516,417 
271,000 2,828,000 
272,654 2,826,792 
5,941,000 
2,598,377 
4,003,000 
3,984,095 
1,050,000 
662,032 
2,000 
857 
6,862,8( 
10,369,6 
3,599,00 
3,559,34 
171,94 
695,78 
1,10 
93,000 165,000 
91,248 166,614 
361,225 ' 
361,225 2 
7,614,042 
7,608,324 
243,235 3 
243,235 
185,688 
185,688 
00 29,206,710 
38 28,649,845 
0 66,138,240 
11 66,072,487 
11 2,567,441 
38 2,466,398 
- 305,290 
- 305,290 
- 2,243,535 
)3 2,243,372 
- 159,975 
- 159,975 
533,1695 
533,169' 
15,603,644 
15,602,260 
9-28

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost To 
Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
8. Cross-Florida 
Barge Canal 
(Federal Funds) 
9. Eau Gallie 
Harbor, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
10. Fernandina 
Harbor, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
11. Fort Myers Beach 
Channel, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
12. Fort Pierce 
Harbor, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
13. Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway 
Caloosahatchee 
River to Anclote 
River, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
14. Intracoastal 
Waterway 
Jacksonville to 
Miami, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
73,036 
1,841,000 
1,892,291 
3,973 
1,062,000 
991,403 
115,000 
191,348 
- 2,000 
- 1,929 
235,000 
119,754 
1,234,700 
1,228,341 
(776) 
1,718,150 1,796,000 
1,711,069 1,768,672 
20,000 
(6) 
- 
20,000 
16,974
0
0 
1,768,000 
1,788,068 
10,345
- 13,000 
- 7,893 
468,000 
487,934 
163,000 
159,143 
45,000 
47,568 
2,788,500 
2,738,650 
450,000 
356,433 
1,114,850 
1,087,463 
82,000 
79,225 
1,327,000 
1,351,314 
10,000 20,000 
14,870 19,738 
470,000 3,080,500 
512,751 2,856,790 
855,100 572,000 
893,400 575,826 
- 1,991,000 
- 1,352,897 
294,000 128,000 
294,888 130,165 
3,620,000 1,343,000 
3,638,630 1,288,042 
9-29 
63,647,473 
63,647,442 
33,181,1766 
33,146,819 6 
9,627 
9,627 
732,900 
729,803 
4,639,040 
4,639,040 ' 
33,049,438 
33,038,463 
935,000 
934,054 
158,140 
158,140 K 
1,227,091 
1,226,591 
4,718,500 
4,370,622 
8,490,636 
8,485,462 
2,009,574 
1,371,471 
8,112,557y 
8,112,557y 
8,627,959 o 
8,627,787 o 
19,251,598 11 
19,251,598 " 
44,995,028 ' 
44,927,871 ' 
61,000 
61,000

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-A (Continued) .COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost To 
Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
15. Jacksonville 
Harbor, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
16. Jacksonville Hbr. 
(Mill Cove), FL 
(Federal Funds) 
17. Johns Pass, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
18. Long Boat 
Pass, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
19. Manatee 
Harbor, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
20. Mayaguez 
Harbor, PR 
(Federal Funds) 
21. Melbourne 
Harbor, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp.. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
293,200 
290,775 
53,045
- 50,000 
- 48,543 
(600) 
(426) 
32,000 
27,983 
4,822,000 2,904,000 
4,803,221 2,888,513 
4,288,000 
4,313,791 
2,202 
61,500 75,000 
60,718 77,015 
47,596,278 13 
47,596,278 "13 
86,482,068 14 
86,470,393 " 
102,813 
102,813 
927,654 15 
927,654,5 
25,000 
25,000 
4,104,000 
4,093,977 
82,098 
82,098 6 
546,275 
546,051 
- - 1,020,233 
- - 1,020,233 
80,000 75,000 2,623,191 
77,566 81,170 2,622,909 
- - 172,324 
- - 172,324 
(137,000) 250,000 1,285,000 (920,000) 
33,037 134,126 111,841 141,135 
- - - 25,000 
1,693,000 
1,459,615 
25,000 
- 168,187 
- 168,187 
- 1,061,561 
- 1,061,561 
8,700 
8,700 
17,696 
17,696 
634,864 
634,863 
9-30

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost To 
Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
22. Miami 
Harbor, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
23. New Pass 
Sarasota, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
24. Okeechobee 
Waterway, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
25. Oklawaha 
River, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
26. Palm Beach 
Harbor, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
27. Ponce de Leon 
Inlet, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
28. Ponce Harbor, 
PR 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work: 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
341,000 
211,015 
690,000 
683,850 
302,000 
251,409 
206,000 
211,940 
11,110,923 
10,518,179 
125,000 
127,319 
(2,400) 60,000 302,000 
21 54,406 305,806 
1,017,000 45,406,989 17 
1,850,835 45,381,064 17 
112,000 5,482,517 
52,881 5,422,563 
- 2,300,710 18 
- 2,274,595 18 
125,000 
123,803 
45,811 19 
45,811 19 
4,905,926 
4,902,941 
- - - - 21,756,418 "2 
- - - - 21,756,418 21 
4,544,250 3,061,550 5,540,000 3,518,000 59,384,521 21 
4,537,698 2,996,492 5,451,019 3,302,685 58,984,374 2 
40,000 
36,431 
83,000 
86,693 
1,017,000 423,000 
1,016,978 417,280 
37,600 
40,134 
34,000 
33,662 
- (32,198) 
- 1,400 
- 1,400 
67,000 104,000 
66,780 99,798 
2,039,000 
2,030,105 
2,305,000 
2,317,688 
315,264 22 
315,264 22 
2,595,576 23 
2,590,901 23 
6,924,021 4 
6,911,204 24 
19,640,946 25 
19,637,982 25 
- - 1,953,276 
- - 1,953,276 
81,000 50,000 19,439,938 
77,510 47,947 19,434,057 
- - 2,415,600 
- - 2,415,600 
- - 1,379,000 
- - 1,112,663 
(15,072) (32,000) 
- - 
- 10,697 
2,227,928 26 
2,227,260 '6 
1,779,270 
1,779,270 
717,304 
717,304 
9-31

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost To 
Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
29. Port Everglades 
Harbor, FIl 
(Federal Funds) 
30. Removal of 
Aquatic Growth 
(Federal Funds) 
31. St. Augustine 
Harbor, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
32. St. Johns 
River, FL 
Jacksonville to 
Lake Harney 
(Federal Funds) 
33. St. Lucie 
Inlet, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
34. San Juan 
Harbor, PR 
(Federal Funds) 
35. Tampa Harbor, FL 
(Main Channel) 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
35. Tampa Harbor, FL 
(Cont) (East Bay - 
Branch Channels) 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
- 10.031 
- 45,000 
- 44,632 279 
2,692,000 2,654,000 3,289,000 3,806,000 
2,721,820 2,642,895 3,292,416 3,795,707 
1,393 
54,426,773 27 
54,426,666 27 
1,849,878 
1,849,789 
54,719,137 
54,696,041 
- - - 1,476,4342x 
- - - 1,476,434 '" 
15,000 107,000 255,000 5,918,107 
12,098 108,038 246,065 5,907,265 
- 1,171.243 "29 
- 1,171,243 9 
- 1,300,299 
- 1,300,299 3" 
102,000 
102,746 
430,000 
43,241 
836,000 453,000 
838,603 450,648 
- (234,222) 
145,161 (18,314) 
2,046,000 
2,047,289 
461,395 
143,981 
7,766,689 31 
7,766,489 3 
9,579,485 
9.577,197 
3,743,199 
3,389,087 
- - - - 13,744,968 3" 
- - - - 13,744,968 32 
1,862,000 477,000 1,375,000 860,000 21,502,135 33 
1,874,848 473,469 1,341,441 885,666 21,490,571 33 
- 1,250 
4,656,000 4,557,000 
4,598,064 2,158 
(100,000) 
60,804 
16,855 
(96) 
268 
- - 173,767,490 3* 
- - 173,767,440* 
1,910,000 296,000 40,506,095 3 
1,896,810 309,006 40,503,753 " 
- - 1,038,711 
- - 1,038,711 
- (10,000) 
-_- 
1,690,000 
1,689,190 
814,450 
718,674 
9-32

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost To 
Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
35. Tampa Harbor, FL 
(Port Sutton) 
(Federal Funds) 
39. Brevard County, 
FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
40. Broward County, 
FL Beach Erosion 
Control & Hillsboro 
Inlet, FL 
Navigation Proj. 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
41. Duval County, 
FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
42. Ft. Pierce Beach, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
43. Indian River 
County, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
44. Lee County, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
45. Manatee County, 
FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
46. Martin County, 
FL 
(Federal Funds) 
47. Nassau County, 
FL 
(Federal Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
70,000 
58,849 
10,574 
3,916,000 
3,916,000 
1,702,149 
1,702,149 
250,000 
219,827 
(490,000) 
652,615 
- 350,000 (15,000) 
6,037 - - 
2,863 
27,897 
- (7,00 
187 8,91 
- 15,00 
14,538 62,03 
443,000 673,000 
457,550 102,303 
- 1,321,500 
52,667 129,083 
- 300,000 
122,858 197,075 
- 114 
3,226,00 
3,412,85 
3,964,50 
1,610,38 
- 85,00 
120,106 123,95 
- (15,000 
- 36 
- 1,816,000 491,00 
- 1,803,381 449,01 
2,100,000 
186,661 
1,800,000 
141,766 
3,298,000 
3,467,449 
2,000,000 
2,492,607 
(1,700,000) 920,00 
(113,223) 1,082,32 
- (462,652 
702,975 
- - - 246,30 
- - - 174,57 
270,000 275,000 283,000 239,50 
217,713 294,970 266,107 282,01 
555,000 
204,582 
0) 2,339,492 
1 2,336,128 
- 29,001 
- 29,001 
- 2,262,000 
- 2,257,081 
0 19,360,100 
6 19,355,795 
- 26,884 
- 26,884 
- 3,460,990 
- 3,460,990 
)0 18,805,900 
3 18,174,481 
0 16,895,567 
5 13,200,096 
10 1,810,448 
1 1,759,443 
- 908,000 
- 904,411 
)) 386,000 
0 385,682 
0 2,307,000 
7 2,252,398 
0 5,760,600 
5 5,728,174 
z) 3,337,348 
- 3,337,348 
0 246,300 
6 174,576 
0 1,067,500 
1 1,060,802 
9-33

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost To 
Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
48. Palm Beach 
County, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
49. Palm Beach 
Island, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
50. Pinellas County, 
FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
51. St. Johns County, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
52. Sarasota County, 
FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
55. Central and 
Southern Florida 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
56. Dade County, 
FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
57. Dade County, 
N. of Haulover 
Beach, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
58. Four River 
Basins, FL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
93,000 25,000 2,972,000 (49,400) 
101,160 61,421 2,792,171 145,718 
- (12,000) 
12,620 8,935 - 12,760 
4,098,000 (300,000) 837,000 630,00 
3,265,479 2,108,529 399,324 925,75 
1,501,462 
3,623,575 1,794,102 
- 327,500 
- 288,178 
269,000 100,000 1,500,000 
262,057 182,483 305,622 
- - 1,812,726 
- - 690,059 
7,775,000 8,806,000 17,850,000 
7,942,357 8,830,836 7,130,872 
6,049,750 7,987,000 10,717,900 
6,035,778 7,926,650 10,657,195 
- - 263,200 
83,983 12,290 (72) 
489,000 542,000 2,413,000 
661,611 568,363 (23,224) 
- - 4,000,000 
492,252 - 837,382 
523 7,003 (133,737) 
- - 133,737 
(59,000) 
38,536 
202,145 
4,000,000 
4,316,776 
1,671,274 
1,515,707 
8,624,000 
8,503,319 
12,423,000 
12,219,827 
199,560 
55,561 
100,000 
2,455,294 
875,958 
(139,000)
-_ 
181,000 1,723,000 (887,000) 
210,764 555,828 393,944 
(104,333) 115,144 
9,020,434 
8,980,719 
13,621 
13,621 
1,793,000 
1,792,940 
J0 20,852,693 
54 20,404,830 
- 5,625 
- 5,625 
- 20,160,345 
- 18,915,729 
327,500 
288,178 
6,469,000 
5,573,534 
3,484,000 
2,205,766 
412,780,398 37 
400,629,691 37 
113,242,940 
112,849,754 
58,010,809 
57,568,070 
41,851,564 3 
41,644,429 
31,857,335 3 
29,207,904 3 
6,802,000 
6,801,611 
8,082,927 
7,736,208 
75,350,095 
75,305,865 
13,909,201 
13,895,806 
9-34

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost to 
Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep.30, 1995 
59. Portugues and New Work: 
Bucana Rivers, Approp. 19,380,000 17,001,000 10,356,000 11,536,400 343,514,968 
PR Cost 19,558,294 17,478,472 8,613,221 13,093,152 340,640,692 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) New Work: 
Approp. 900,000 208,912 1,040,000 493,175 3,002,087 
Cost (11,738) 967,870 612,477 492,544 2,420,466 
60. Rio De La Plata, New Work: 
PR Approp. - - - 450,000 450,000 
(Federal Funds) Cost - - - 340,000 340,000 
61. Rio Puerto Nuevo, New Work: 
PR Approp. - - 1,292,000 1,747,900 3,039,900 
(Federal Funds) Cost - - 933,799 1,745,378 2,679,177 
(Contrib. Funds) New Work: 
Approp. - - - 850,000 850,000 
Cost - - - - - 
69. General Regulatory New Work: 
(Federal Funds) Approp. 5,240,000 5,508,000 5,960,000 7,115,000 40,774,200 41 
Cost 5,010,334 5,639,314 5,989,891 6,995,379 40,475,372 41 
72. Kissimmee River, FL New Work: 
(Federal Funds) Approp. 600,000 3,000,000 22,179,000 4,000,000 32,079,000 
Cost 590,501 2,179,618 6,821,112 2,663,570 14,302,423 
' Excludes $288,000 for contributed funds for new work. 
2 Includes $97,566 for previous project. 
s Excludes $243,235 contributed funds for new work. 
' Excludes $700,000 contributed by NASA in connection with 
construction of lock. 
SIncludes $113,000 for new work on previous project; excludes 
$15,563 expended for new work on existing project in Boca Grande 
entrance channel from contributed funds. 
6 Excludes $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. 
SIncludes $905,221 expended for recreation facilities. 
SIncludes $10,128 cost for reconnaissance and detailed project report 
prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. Excludes 
$1,095 contributed funds for new work. 
SIncludes $515,479 for new work for previous projects: $8,472 for 
new work on Sunshine Skyway Channel; and $9,707 for new work 
for Cats Point Channel. Excludes $14,473 contributed funds for new 
work for Sunshine Skyway and Boca Ciega Bay channels. 
SIncludes $450,749 for maintenance for previous project. 
" Includes $94,776 for work for previous projects. 
Excludes $2,199,842 expended from public works funds for new 
work. 
' Includes $213,222 for maintenance on previous projects and $3,179 
operating and care under provisions of permanent indefinite 
appropriation. 
13 Includes $3,520,137 new work on previous project and $290,013 
for new work expended from public works funds. 
14 Includes $543,399 maintenance on previous projects. 
'S Includes unused contributed funds of $64,136 returned to local 
interests. 
16 Project authorized December 2, 1964, by Chief of Engineers under 
Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 R&H 
Act. Cost of new work excludes $53,732 contributed funds. 
17 Includes $5,502,126 expended from public work funds for new 
work. Includes costs of $6,777,906 for recreation facilities. 
'8 Includes $381,479 work-in-kind and $172,314 in costs for north 
jetty recreation facility. 
'9 Excludes $45,811 contributed funds for new work. 
20 Includes $21,101,919 for new work under previous project, 
$626,925 for recreational facilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for 
reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 
107 modification to the project. 
21 Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes 
$1,000 for maintenance from contributed funds on previous projects, 
$67,558 which represents services rendered without reimbursement, 
and $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. 
22 Includes $3,912 for new work for previous projects. 
23 Includes $11,414 for operating and care under provisions for 
permanent indefinite appropriation. 
24 Includes $80,000 new work from public works funds. Excludes 
$509,506 contributed funds. 
2s Includes $30,000 for maintenance from public works funds. 
26 Includes $11,588 expended for restudy, but excludes $21,960 
expended for new work from contributed funds. 
27 Excludes $1,033,069 contributed funds. 
28 Includes $71,303 for new work on previous project. Excludes 
$137,500 contributed funds. 
29 Baresford cutoff and completion of cutoffs and easing of bends in 
Putnam Lake and Volusia Counties in inactive status were 
deauthorized by Public Law 93-251 section 12. Includes $29,566 
for new work under previous project. 
9-35

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
* Includes $25,838 under previous project. 
, Includes $26,689 for new work under previous project. 
n Includes $747,684 for new work under previous project. Excludes 
$100,000 expended for new work from contributed funds. 
" Includes $44,730 for maintenance from public works funds under 
previous project. 
SIncludes $853,050 for new work from public works funds under 
previous project& $1,463,000 from emergency relief funds. Excludes 
$270,466 for new work for Hillsborough River and $13,939 for new 
work from contributed funds. 
' Includes $17,107 for maintenance under previous project. 
SExcludes work-in-kind. 
* Excludes $15,543 for property received without reimbursement and 
R&H Funds, expended on previous projects (see cost and financial 
statement for Okeechobee Waterway, FL, project for these costs). 
Excludes $100,000 advanced by local interests toward federal costs. 
Includes $175,000 appropriation and $175,000 cost for new work at 
C&SF St. Johns Water Management District. 
SIncludes $2,294,134 for reimbursement costs to Bal Harbor. 
SExcludes unused contributed funds of $17,969 returned to local 
interests. 
* Includes costs of $89,691 for recreation facilities at Moss Bluff and 
$2,638,272 at Lake Tarpon. 
" Funds appropriated under General Regulatory Functions 96X3126. 
9-36

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
October 27, 1965 
NAVIGATION 
PROJECTS 
August 26, 1937 
March 4, 1913 
June 20, 1939 
July 14, 1960 
March 2, 1945 
October 23, 1962 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
October 1985 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
July 24, 1991 
June 20, 1938 
July 14, 1960 
July 25, 1912 
March 3, 1925 
July 3, 1930 
AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) 
Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, 
and continued research to develop best method of control. 
ARECIBO HARBOR, PR (See Section 2 of Text) 
Construction of breakwater 1,200 feet long and dredging channel 
25 feet deep and 400 feet wide with flare at entrance and 
widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area. 
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN 
NORFOLK, VA AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL 
(See Section 3 of Text) 
Channel 7 x 100 feet. 
Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cutoffs. 
BAKERS HAULOVER (See Section 4 of Text) 
Channel 11 x 200 feet in ocean entrance, thence 8 x 100 feet to 
Intracoastal Waterway; Marina basin 8 x 200 feet; reconstruction 
of jetties and protection of inlet shores. 
CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL (See Section 5 of Text) 
Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, 
and a barge canal with a lock. 
Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel 
and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west 
of 35-foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant. 
Mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at Port Canaveral West 
Turning Basin Project. 
Project for navigation, Canaveral Harbor, FL, 
as modified by the letter of the Secretary 
dated October 10, 1991 
CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL 
(See Section 6 of Text) 
Interior channel 6 x 70 feet. 
Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 
feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 
10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins. 
CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL (See Section 7 of Text) 
Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance. 
Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at bend. 
Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin. 
H.Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 43, 75th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 898, 62nd Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 618, 75th Cong., 
3d sess. 
H.Doc. 189, 86th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 367, 77th Cong., 
1st sess. 
S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
P.L. 102-580, 31 Oct. 1992 
102nd Cong., 2d sess. 
H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong., 
3d sess. 
H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee, Doc. 1, 
70th Cong., 1st sess. 
9-37

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
August 26, 1937 
May 17, 1950 
P.O. 675/77 
July 23, 1942 
W.R.D.A. 
November 17, 1986 
W.R.D.A. 
November 28, 1990 
W.R.D.A. 
October 31, 1992 
June 20, 1938 
June 14, 1880 
July 13, 1892 
March 2, 1907 
June 25, 1910 
March 3, 1925 
June 20, 1938 
March 2, 1945 
May 17, 1950 
Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend. Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc.95, 
74thCong.,2dsess. 
Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel. H.Doc. 186, 81st Cong., 
1st sess. 
CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL (See Section 8 of Text) 
Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet. H.Doc. 109, 79th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Establishment of the Cross Florida National Conservation Area. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Deauthorized project purposes in the Act of July 23, 1942, transferred P.L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990, 
lands and completed facilities to the state, and required state payments to 101st Cong., 2d sess. 
Citrus, Clay, Duval, Levy, Marion and Putnam counties. 
During the period November 28, 1992 and September 30, 1993, authorized P.L. 102-580,31 Oct. 1992, 
and directed to enter into a contract with the St. Johns River Water 102nd Cong., 2d sess. 
Management District and the Southwest Florida Water Management District 
of the State of Florida for the continued operation and maintenance 
of the project. The maintenance shall be performed at a level of service 
that is necessary to ensure safe operating conditions and to prevent 
deterioration of the structures. No major rehabilitations or renovations 
shall be performed in such portions of the project during such period. 
Funding for the continued operation and maintenance of the barge canal 
project, shall not exceed $300,000 federal and the State of Florida shall 
pay a non-federal share of $600,000 to fund the continued maintenance. 
EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL (See Section 9 of Text) 
Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. H.Doc. 497. 75th Cong., 
3d sess. 
FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL (See Section 10 of Text) 
Entrance jetties. Annual Report 1879 
Raising and extending jetties to provide a 19-foot depth. Annual Report 1891 & 1896 
Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20 to 24-foot depth and 400 to H.Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 
600-foot channel width. 1st sess. 
Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland 
Sound under the general heading of Fernandina Harbor. 
Provided for a 26-foot channel. 
Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin. 
Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from 
1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity 
vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized 
project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. 
Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin. 
W.R.D.A. Redesignated location of turning basin until Section 107 (R&H Act of 
November 28, 1990 1960) study is completed and the resulting project constructed. 
H.Doc. 227, 68th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 548, 75th Cong., 
3d sess. 
H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 662, 80th Cong., 
2d sess. 
P.L. 101-640, 28 Nov. 1990 
101st Cong., ?? sess. 
9-38

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
July 14, 1960 
Auth. by Chief of 
Engineers 
December 6, 1968 
under Sec. 107 of 
1960 R&H Act 
Def. Act of 
March 4, 1931 
War Dept. Approp. 
Act, March 4, 1933 
August 30, 1935 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
December 14, 1987 
March 2, 1945 
June 30, 1948 
May 17, 1950 
September 3, 1954 
May 10-16, 1957 
Auth. March 1, 1962 
FORT MYERS BEACH, FL (See Section 11 of Text) 
12 x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in 
Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals. 
Extension of 11 x 125 foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and 
including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in 
Matanzas Pass. 
FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL (See Section 12 of Text) 
Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local 
interests. 
Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel. 
Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging 
channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions. 
Deepening and enlarging channels and turning basin. 
Total cost of $6,742,000. 
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER 
TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL (See Section 13 of Text) 
9 x 100 foot channel; deepening channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet 
and construction of highway bridge at Venice. 
Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U.S. 
Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used. 
Use of alternate Route C-1 in Venice-Lemon Bay area. 
Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and 
any other necessary crossing over Route C-1. 
Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to 9 x 100 feet. 
by Senate and House 
Public Works Comm. 
Auth. by Chief of 6 x 80 foot channel in Boca Ciega Bay. 
Engineers, March 
1, 1963, under Sec. 
107 of 1960 R&H Act 
H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong. 
1st sess. 
Specified in Act 
Specified in Act 
H.Doc. 252, 72nd Cong., 
1st sess. and Rivers 
and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 21, 74th Cong., 
1st sess. 
P.L. 100-676,17 Nov. 1988, 
100th Cong., 2d sess. 
H.Doc. 371, 76th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Specified in Act 
Specified in Act 
Specified in Act 
H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong., 
1st sess. 
January 21, 1927 
July 3, 1930 
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL 
(See Section 14 of Text) 
Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami. I 
Channel width of 100 feet. 5 
PARA June 26, 1934 Operation and care of Palm Valley Bridge. S
IH.Doc. 586, 69th Cong., 
2d sess. 
.Doc. 71, 71st Cong., 
2d sess. 
pecified in Act 
9-39

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Turning basin at Jacksonville Beach. 
Channel 12 x 125 feet. 
Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian (deauthorized). 
Turning basin at Vero Beach. 
July 3, 1958 Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach. 
Chief of Engineers Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami. 
Report of July 22, 1960, 
Mod. 12-foot channel 
March 2, 1907 
November 17, 1986 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
12 Feb. 1982 
Auth. by Chief of 
Engineers Dec. 2, 
1964 under Sec. 
107 of 1960 R&H 
Act and Sec. 110 
of 1966 R&H Act 
H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 740, 79th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 261, 76th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., 
1st sess. 
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL (See Section 15 of Text) 
ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL OPPOSITE THE CITY OF 
JACKSONVILLE 
The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad H.Doc 663, 59th Cong., 
bridge. 1st sess. 
Deauthorized the 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast P.L. 99-662, 28 Nov. 1986, 
Railroad bridge. 99th Cong., 2d sess. 
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL 
(See Section 16 of Text) 
Enlarge weir structure and west opening controlling flow into Mill P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 
Cove, to reduce shoaling and improve navigation as well as 99th Cong., 2d sess. 
circulation. 
JOHN'S PASS, FL (See Section 17 of Text) 
Channel 10 x 100 feet in gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, 
6 x 100 feet to IWW, 2.6 miles long. 
LONGBOAT PASS, FL (See Section 18 of Text) 
Auth. by Chief of 12 x 150 foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mexico to Longboat 
Engineers, April Bridge; 10 x 100 foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly 
20, 1976 under to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge. 
Sec. 107 of 1960 
R&H Act, as amended 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
12 May 1980 
W.R.D.A. 
November 28, 1990 
MANATEE HARBOR, FL (See Section 19 of Text) 
Provide for maintenance of the existing 40-foot deep draft navigation 
channel and turning basin from Tampa Bay to Port Manatee. Initial 
construction of a widener at Manatee Harbor and deepen area adjacent 
to berthing area. 
Modified the project for navigation authorized by the W.R.D.A. of 1986 
to construct substantially in accordance with the post authorization 
change report dated April 1990. 
P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
P.L. 101-640, 28 Nov. 1990, 
101st Cong., ?? sess. 
9-40 
August 26, 1937 
March 2, 1945 
March 2, 1945 
March 2, 1945

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
August 30, 1935 
August 26, 1937 
July 3, 1930 
PWA Program 
Sept. 6, 1933 
June 13, 1902 
March 2, 1907 
March 4, 1913 
March 3, 1925 
July 3, 1930 
August 30, 1935 
August 26, 1937 
March 2, 1945 
March 2, 1945 
July 14, 1960 
MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR (See Section 20 of Text) 
Approach channel 30 feet deep to and along deep water terminal. 
MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL (See Section 21 of Text) 
Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. 
MIAMI HARBOR, FL (See Section 22 of Text) 
MIAMI RIVER 
The 15-foot channel in Miami River, 150 feet wide at the mouth. 
The channel at Dinner Key Airport. 
An 18-foot channel in a land cut across the peninsula and 
construction of the north jetty. 
Construction of the south jetty and increase of channel width 
to 100 feet. 
Modification of local cooperation requirements imposed by the 
Act of July 25, 1912. 
A channel 25 feet deep with present widths from the ocean to Biscayne 
Bay, thence 200 feet wide across the bay to but not including the 
municipal turning basin, and extension of both jetties. 
A channel width of 300 feet across the bay and enlarging the municipal 
turning basin, with expenditures thereon limited to $200,000. 
A depth of 30 feet from the ocean to and in the turning basin, 
with the existing authorized project widths, including the 
300-foot width in the channel across the bay. 
Extending the turning basin 200 feet to the southward. 
The Virginia Key improvement. 
For incorporation of the project for Miami River in that for Miami 
Harbor, the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project 
widths; the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin 
and to Government Cut; and the channel from Miami River to the harbor of 
refuge, provided that local interests contribute one-third of the cost. 
Deletion of Virginia Key development and the Dinner Key approach channel, 
widening the existing ship channel by easing the ocean bend and 
increasing the width of the 300-foot wide section to 500 feet, 
enlarging the existing turning basin 300 feet along both the south and 
northeasterly sides, and dredging a turning basin along the north side 
of Fisher Island about 39 acres in extent and 30 feet in depth. 
H.Doc. 215, 72nd Cong., 
1st sess. & River and 
Harbor Committee Doc. 1, 
73rd Cong., 1st sess. 
H.Doc. 390, 74th Cong., 
2d sess. 
Specified in Act 
S.Doc. 95, 72nd Cong., 
1st sess. and 
Specified in Act 
H.Doc. 622, 56th Cong., 
1st sess. (Annual 
Report 1900, p. 1987) 
Specified in Act 
Specified in Act 
H.Doc. 516, 67th Cong., 
4th sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 15, 
71st Cong., 2d sess. 
Sen. Comm. Print. 
73rd Cong., 2d sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 86, 
74th Cong., 2d sess. 
S.Doc. 251, 79th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 91, 79th Cong.. 
1st sess. 
S.Doc. 71, 85th Cong., 
2d sess. 
9-41

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
August 13, 1968 
W.R.D.A. 
November 17, 1986 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
25 September 1989 
Auth. by Chief 
of Engineers 
April 20, 1964 
under Sec. 107 
of 1960 R&H Act 
PARA June 26, 
August 26, 1937 
March 2, 1945 
March 2, 1945 
W.R.D.A. 
November 17, 
Auth. by Chief 
of Engineers 
Nov. 5, 1968, 
under Sec. 107 
of 1960 R&H 
September 19, 1890 
March 2, 1907 
June 25, 1910 
July 25, 1912 
July 27, 1916 
PARA June 26, 1934 
W.R.D.A. 
November 17, 1986 
Enlarging existing entrance channel to 38 x 500 feet, deepening existing 
400-foot wide channel across Biscayne Bay to 36 feet; deepening existing 
turning basins at Biscayne Boulevard terminal and Fisher Island to 36 feet. 
Deauthorized the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project 
widths; and the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin, 
to Government Cut, and to a harbor of refuge in Palmer Lake. 
The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel. 
NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL (See Section 23 of Text) 
10 x 150 foot entrance channel; 8 x 100 foot inner channels; and 
8-foot deep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier. 
OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL (See Section 24 of Text) 
1934 Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from 
R&H appropriations. 
7 New lock and weir structure in St. Lucie Canal. 
Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway 
near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston. 
Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart. 
Deauthorized basin at Stuart. 
1986 
Enlarge existing 8 x 90 foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for 
about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet. 
Act 
OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL (See Section 25 of Text) 
Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg. 
Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run. 
Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river. 
Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of 
natural river bed. 
Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from 
appropriations for rivers and harbors. 
Deauthorized channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run. 
S.Doc. 93, 90th Cong., 
2d sess. 
P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
P.L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990, 
101st Cong, ?? sess. 
Specified in Act 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 28, 
75th Cong., 1st sess. 
H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 
3d sess. 
H.Doc. 736, 79th Cong., 
2d sess. 
P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Annual Report 1889, p. 1360 
H.Doc. 782, 59th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Specified in Acts 
Specified in Act 
Specified in Act 
P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
9-42

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
March 13, 1934 
December 10, 1934 
August 30, 1935 
March 2, 1945 
May 17, 1950 
July 14, 1960 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
10 Dec. 1985 
October 27, 1965 
March 3, 1925 
August 30, 1935 
March 2, 1945 
H.R. September 23, 
1976, S.R. 
October 1, 1976 
PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL (See Section 26 of Text) 
Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local 
interests. 
Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local 
interests, to 20 feet. 
Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration, 
and widening the channels to existing project dimensions, enlarging the 
700-foot square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point 
on south side of the inlet, revetting the banks of the inlet, and 
restoring existing jetties. 
Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet. 
H.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., 
2d sess. 
Recommended by Chief of 
Engineers to Public 
Works Administration 
October 17, 1934 
H.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., 
2d sess. and Rivers 
and Harbors Comm. 
Doc. 42, 74th 
Cong., 1st sess. 
H.Doc. 530, 78th Cong., 
2d sess. 
Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a H.Doc. 704, 80th Cong., 
flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed not to exceed 2d sess. 
$305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1, 1949. 
An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., 
merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.3 1st sess. (contains 
mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet latest published map) 
north-south by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west. 
Assume maintenance of locally expanded turning basin to a depth of P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 
25 feet on north side of existing basin. 99th Cong., 2d sess. 
PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL (See Section 27 of Text) 
Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south sides of inlet; H.Doc. 74, 89th Cong., 
a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment basin inside the weir. 1st sess. 
PONCE HARBOR, PR (See Section 28 of Text) 
Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 
feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local 
interests. 
Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. 
undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds 
previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the 
improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests. 
Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided 
for dredging 30-foot depth area and 18 acres off the municipal 
pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero. 
Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot 
project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion adjacent to the 
municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to 
harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin. 
H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., 
Cong., 4th sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 18, 
72nd Cong., 1st sess. 
H.Doc. 745, 79th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., 
2d sess. 
PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL (See Section 29 of Text) 
Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests. H.Doc. 357, 71st Cong., 
2d sess. 
9-43 
July 3, 1930

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
August 30, 1935 
June 20, 1938 
July 24, 1946 
July 3, 1958 
H.R. May 9, 1974 
SR. May 31, 1974 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
September 23, 1991 
March 3, 1899 
June 13, 1902 
March 3, 1905 
June 20, 1938 
May 17, 1950 
March 3, 1899 
March 2, 1919 
June 14, 1880 
June 25, 1910 
July 3, 1930 
Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet Rivers and Harbors 
square. Committee Doc. 25, 
74th Cong., 1st sess. 
Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side. H.Doc. 545, 75th Cong., 
3d sess. 
Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side H.Doc. 768, 78th Cong., 
and enlarge flare at entrance channel. 2d sess. 
Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alinement and increase H.Doc. 346, 85th Cong., 
turning basin in size and depth. 2d sess. 
Deepen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen H.Doc. 144, 93rd Cong., 
Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning 1st sess. 
for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent 
upon need as developed by detailed post authorization studies. 
Project for navigation. P.L. 102-580, 31 Oct. 1992 
102nd Cong., 2d sess. 
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE 
WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section 30 of Text) 
Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms Annual Report 1899 
for removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State. 
Extermination and removal of water hyacinths by any mechanical, Specified in Act 
chemical or other means. 
Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle. Specified in Act 
ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL (See Section 31 of Text) 
Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin. H.Doc. 555, 75th Cong., 
3d sess. 
Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to Intracoastal H.Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 
Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward extension of 1st sess. 
groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River. 
ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE 
HARNEY (See Section 32 of Text) 
A channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Jacksonville to H.Doc. 523, 55th Cong.. 
Palatka. 2d sess. and Annual 
Report 1899 p. 1343 
The improvement of Deep Creek. H.Doc. 699, 63rd Cong., 
2d sess. 
Two jetties at Volusia Bar (Maintenance only; new work completed Annual Report for 1879, 
under previous project). pp. 795-798 
A channel 100 feet wide, 8 feet deep from Palatka to Sanford with a H.Doc. 1111, 60th 
side channel to Enterprise, and thence 5 feet deep to Lake Harney. Cong., 2d sess. 
Cutoffs at Butcher Bend, Shake Creek, and Starks Landing, and H.Doc. 691, 69th Cong., 
easing bends at other points. 2d sess. 
9-44

JACISONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
March 2, 1945 
March 2, 1945 
July 24, 1946 
March 2, 1945 
November 7, 1966 
H.R. May 9, 1974 
S.R. May 31, 1974 
August 8, 1917 
September 22, 1922 
July 3, 1930 
August 30, 1935 
August 26, 1937 
October 17, 1940 
March 2, 1945 
July 3, 1958 
A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, 
with a side channel to Enterprise and with cutoffs and easing of 
bends. (Cutoffs deauthorized) 
Combining the two projects above into a single project for St. Johns 
River, FL, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, and for a cutoff 5 feet 
deep and 75 feet wide between Lake Monroe and the vicinity of 
Osteen Bridge (Woodruff Creek Cutoff). 
A channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, 
and in the branch to Enterprise. 
ST. LUCIE INLET, FL (See Section 33 of Text) 
Channel 10 x 200 feet. 
Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet. 
Extending north jetty and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand 
bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; 
construction of south jetty with a walkway for recreational 
fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet through bar cut, tapering to 150 
feet through the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the 
Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of 
material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period. 
SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR (See Section 34 of Text) 
Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel 
to 30-foot depth. 
Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of 
anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth 
extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel. 
Modified condition of local cooperation. 
Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence 
across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 
feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth. 
Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage area to 329 acres. 
Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and 
dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to 
the Graving Dock. 
Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin 
to the Army Terminal. 
Deepening portions of entrance and approach channels and basins to 
Army Terminal and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32- 
foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage. 
H.Doc. 603, 76th Cong., 
3d sess. 
H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 
2d sess. 
S.Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 391, 77th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 508, 89th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 865, 63rd Cong., 
2d sess. 
Specified in Act 
H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 
2d sess. 
R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 
74th Cong., 1st sess. 
R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 
75th Cong., 1st sess. 
H.Doc. 364, 76th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Specified in Act 
H.Doc. 38, 85th Cong., 
1st sess. 
9-45

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
August 4, 1976 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
23 December 1982 
March 3, 1899 
March 3, 1905 
June 25, 1910 
August 8, 1917 
March 3, 1899 
September 22, 1922 
July 3, 1930 
A bar channel 48 x 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening H.Doc. 574, 94th Cong., 
Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing width to 800 2d sess. 
feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while 
widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet 
and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at 
existing 400-foot width; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying 
widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an 
irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 x 250 feet; 
provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six 
mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. 
Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar P.L. 99-662 17 Nov 1986 
Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alinement 350 feet to the west; 99th Cong., 2d sess. 
deepening Anegado, and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock 
Channel, and Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio 
Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area "E" to 38 feet while 
reducing its size and constructing six mooring dolphins within its 
limits. A 1,500-foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be 
added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. 
TAMPA HARBOR, FL (See Section 35 of Text) 
TAMPA BAY 
For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 
500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay. 3d sess. (Also 
printed in Annual 
Report 1899, p. 1640) 
Channel dimensions 
specified in Act 
For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the Gulf Specified in Act 
of Mexico to Port Tampa. 
TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS 
For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay. H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 
2d sess. 
For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 
channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the 1st sess. 
bar, 300 feet in Tampa Bay, Ybor, and Garrison Channels, and 200 
feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with 
turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary. 
HILLSBOROUGH RIVER 
For a 12 x 200 foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. H.Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 
highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a 2d sess. and Annual Report 
previous project under title Improving Hillsborough Bay, FL) 1998, pp 1357-1360 
TAMPA HARBOR 
Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tampa Harbor. Specified in Act 
Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of 
Sparkman Channel to 300 feet. 
H.Doc. 100, 70th Cong., 
1st sess. 
9-46

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth 
of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth 
of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in 
Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading 
to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet 
in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals. 
S.Doc. 22, 72nd Cong., 
1st sess. 
For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough S.Doc. 164, 75th Cong., 
Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending 3d sess. 
the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough 
River) easterly for 300 feet. 
June 20, 1938 
March 2, 1945 
March 2, 1945 
March 2, 1945 
May 17, 1950 
September 3, 1954 
October 23, 1962 
December 31, 1970 
For construction of a breakwater at Peter O. Knight Field, Davis 
Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest. 
For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and Ybor Channel to 500 feet; 
widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 
250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly; and widening the bend 
between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet 
previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly. 
For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for 
about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, 
and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge. 
For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough 
Bay channel to and including a turning basin in the Alafia River. 
(Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950). 
For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa 
Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port 
Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman 
Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 
200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and including a turning 
basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long (in lieu of 
the improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at 
entrance, bends, and turns. 
Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works 
Dam. Maintenance of cleared channel to be assumed by local interests. 
Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel 
34 x 400 feet. 
For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and 
an irregularly shaped turning basin both to a depth of 34 feet. 
Sen. Comm. Print. 
76th Cong., 1st sess. 
S.Doc. 183, 78th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 
1st sess. 
S.Doc. 16, 77th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 258, 81st Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 567, 81st Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 529, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 150, 91st Cong., 
1st sess. 
Enlarge entrance channel across Egmont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the H.Doc. 401, 91st Cong., 
Gulf to Mullet Key. 2d sess. 
Enlarge Mullet Key Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet. Do. 
Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut through Do. 
Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels. 
Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction with Do. 
Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton 
entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the 
existing width of 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Sparkman Channels. 
Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet. Do. 
9-47 
August 30, 1935 
June 20, 1938 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
August 15, 1985 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
28 March 1988 
W.R.D.A. 
November 28, 1990 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
25 January 1979 
W.R.D.A. 
17 Nov. 1986 
Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a 
turning diameter of 1,200 feet. 
Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet. 
Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet. 
Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 feet and 
an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin. 
Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the 
junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin. 
Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing 
length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet. 
An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from 
the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet. 
A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning 
diameter of 1,200 feet. 
An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East 
Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet. 
Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a 
distance of 4,000 feet. 
Maintenance of East Bay channel to 34 x 300 feet for a distance of 
5,500 feet. 
Port Sutton Channel deepening to 43 feet for a distance of 3,700 
feet and a width of 200 feet. 
Maintenance of Alafia Channel to a depth of 34 feet, if a Non-Federal 
Sponsor agrees to reimburse the Secretary 
TAMPA HARBOR BRANCH CHANNELS 
Enlarging Hillsborough Bay Cut D, Sparkman Channel, Port Tampa Channel 
and existing turning basins at the entrance to Ybor Channel and 
at Port Tampa, all to a depth of 41 feet with varying lengths and 
widths and deepening Ybor Channel to a depth of 39 feet. This work 
will be associated with the Main Channel deepening. 
TAMPA HARBOR EAST BAY CHANNEL 
Maintenance dredging at an average annual cost of $471,000. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 
1st sess. 
P.L. 100-676, 17 Nov. 1988, 
100th Cong., 2d sess. 
P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
BEACH EROSION 
CONTROL PROJECTS BREVARD COUNTY, FL (See Section 39 of Text) 
August 13, 1968 Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong., 
2d sess. 
9-48

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
October 27, 1965 
W.R.D.A. 
November 17, 1986 
W.R.D.A. 
November 28, 1990 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
2 April 1982 
August 13, 1968 
August 15, 1985 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
27 December 1983 
October 27, 1965 
River and Harbor 
Act of 1965 
W.R.D.A. 
17 Nov. 1986 
December 31, 1970 
SR. 31 May 1974 
and H.R. 20 Nov. 
1975 
W.R.D.A. 1990 
November 28, 1990 
BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH EROSION CONTROL 
AND HILLSBORO INLET, FL, NAVIGATION PROJECT 
(See Section 40 of Text) 
Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, FL and a 
combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to 
Hillsboro Inlet and the shore south thereof to Port Everglades. 
Deauthorized navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet. 
Continued authorization for Hillsboro Inlet dredging for 5 years. 
CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FL 
Shoreline protection. 
DADE COUNTY, FL (See Section 56 of Text) 
Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood 
control project. 
DADE COUNTY-NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL 
(See Section 57 of Text) 
Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood 
control project. 
Extending of existing shore protection project for Dade County to 
provide for protective beach fill and subsequent nourishment 
along 2.5 miles of shore north of Haulover Beach Park. 
DUVAL COUNTY, FL (See Section 41 of Text) 
Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project. 
FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL (See Section 42 of Text) 
Project for beach erosion control. 
H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., 
1st sess. 
P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
P.L. 101-640, 28 Nov. 1990, 
101st Cong., 2d sess. 
P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 
1st sess. 
P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 
1st sess. 
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL (See Section 43 of Text) 
The plans provide for a 2.65 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 
Vero Beach, a 1.7 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of Sebastian 99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Inlet State Park and for periodic nourishment of the new beaches. 
LEE COUNTY, FL (See Section 44 of Text) 
Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. H.Doc. 395, 91st Cong.,2d 
sess. 
MANATEE COUNTY, FL (See Section 45 of Text) 
The plan provides for a level berm 50 feet wide at an elevation 6 feet S.Doc. 37, 93rd Cong., 
(MLW) along 3.2 miles of shore on Anna Maria Island and nourishment 1st sess. 
of entire Gulf shore of that island as needed throughout project life. 
MARTIN COUNTY (See Section 46 of Text) 
Periodic nourishment over the 50 year life of the project. P.L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990, 
101st Cong., 2d sess. 
9-49

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
22 April 1984 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
May 19, 1986 
October 23, 1962 
May 17, 1950 
July 3, 1958 
November 7, 1966 
Report of the Board 
of Engineers for 
Rivers and Harbors 
23 April 1985 
MONROE COUNTY, FL 
Modification of existing project from 6,200-foot long to 8,770-foot 
long beach fill stabilized with 2 groins and periodic nourishment. 
NASSAU COUNTY, FL(See Section 47 of Text) 
Improvement for beach erosion control on Amelia Island. 
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM MARTIN COUNTY 
LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH 
LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE 
(See Section 48 of Text) 
Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and 
sand-transfer plant. 
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM LAKE WORTH 
INLET TO SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET, FL 
(See Section 49 of Text) 
Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project on 
Palm Beach Island. 
Federal participation in cost of local sand-transfer plant at Lake 
Worth Inlet and shore protection project. 
PINELLAS COUNTY, FL (See Section 50 of Text) 
Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. 
Restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island, 
49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key, 92,000 feet of beach at Treasure 
Island, and construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key. 
Also, renourishment of each island. 
P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
P.L. 100-676,17 Nov. 1988, 
100th Cong., 2d sess. 
H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 772, 80th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 342, 85th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 
2d sess. 
P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
SARASOTA COUNTY, FL (See Section 52 of Text) 
Report of the Shoreline protection along 12,600 feet of shoreline on central 
Chief of Engineers Longboat and 21,100 feet on Manasota Key in the vicinity of 
28 February 1986 Venice, Florida and periodic nourishment of these areas. 
ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL (See Section 51 of Text) 
Report of the Shoreline protection along 2.5 miles of problem area in the St. 
Chief of Engineers Augustine Beach and Coquina Gables area and periodic nourishment. 
26 February 1980 
FLOOD CONTROL 
PROJECTS CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA (See Section 55 
June 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other 
purposes. 
September 3, 1954 Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire 
comprehensive plan of improvement. 
July 14, 1960 Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the 
Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County. 
P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
of Text) 
H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 
2d sess. (Contains 
latest published map) 
H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 
2d sess. 
S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong., 
1st sess. 
9-50

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
October 23, 1962 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
October 27, 1965 
Do. 
August 13, 1968 
Do. 
Approved 
under the provisions 
of Section 201 of 
the Flood Control 
Act of 1965 
W.R.D.A. 
November 17, 1986 
W.R.D.A 
November 17, 1988 
Everglades National 
Park Protection and 
Expansion Act of 
1989 
October 23, 1962 
W.R.D.A. 
November 17, 1986 
Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando. 
Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami. 
Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County. 
Project Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tohopekaliga for flood 
control and major drainage, including development of Reedy Creek Swamp. 
Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood 
control and major drainage. 
Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest 
Dade County. 
Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry 
County. 
Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available 
water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties. 
Improvement of supply, distribution and conservation of water resources 
in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee 
agricultural area, Everglades National Park and other related areas. 
Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. 
December 17, 1970 
Deauthorized flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando; primary works 
for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County; and 
navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. 
Extended modified water delivery schedules to Everglades National Park to 
January 1, 1992. 
Construct modifications to the Central and Southern Florida Project to 
improve water deliveries into the park and shall, to the extent practicable, 
take steps to restore the natural hydrological conditions within the park. 
FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL (See Section 58 of Text) 
Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water 
conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, 
reservoirs, and control structures. 
Deauthorized Anclote River control structure and channel improvement. 
S.Doc. 125, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
S.Doc. 123, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
S.Doc 138, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
S.Doc. 20, 89th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., 
1st sess. 
S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., 
2d sess. 
P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
P.L. 100-676, 17 Nov. 1988, 
P.L. 101-229, 13 Dec. 1989, 
101st Cong., 2d sess. 
H.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
9-51

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR 
(See Section 59 of Text) 
December 31, 1970 
LAGO de CERRILLOS, PR 
Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and 
recreation. 
H.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 
2d sess. 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
March 5, 1992 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
25 April 1986 
Report of the 
Chief Engineers 
January 1989 
Sec. 205 of the 
Flood Control 
Act of 1948 
LAGO de PORTUGUES, PR 
Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation. 
PONCE, PR 
Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control. 
RIO GRANDE DE LOIZA, PR 
Project for flood control. P.L. 102-580, 31 Oct. 1992 
102nd Cong., 2d sess. 
RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR (See Section 61 of Text) 
Project for flood control. 
RIO DE LA PLATA, PR (See Section 60 of Text) 
Project for flood control. 
SAVAN GUT, ST. THOMAS, VI 
Project for flood control. Increased maximum allotment to 
$100,000. 
W.R.D.A. Set maximum amount allotted under Section 205 of the Flood 
November 28, 1990 Control Act of 1948 at $10,000,000. 
W.R.D.A. 
October 31, 1992 
W.R.D.A. 
November 28, 1990 
Report of the 
Chief of Engineers 
March 17, 1992 
TURPENTINE RUN, ST. THOMAS, VIRGIN ISLANDS 
Project for flood control. 
KISSIMMEE RIVER RESTORATION, FL (See Section 72 
Conduct a feasibility study for the purpose of determining modifications of 
the flood control project for central and southern Florida, authorized by 
section 203 of Flood Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1176), which are 
necessary to provide a comprehensive plan for the environmental restoration. 
Project for the ecosystem restoration, to construct the headwaters 
revitalization project, and any modifications for the environmental 
restoration of the Kissimme River Basin, ensuring that implementation 
of the project to restore the Kissimmee River will maintain the same level 
of flood protection as is provided by the current flood control project. 
P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
P.L. 858, 30 Jun. 1948, 
80th Cong, 2d sess. 
P.L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990, 
101st Cong., 2d sess. 
P.L. 102-580, 31 Oct. 1992 
102nd Cong., 2d sess. 
of Text) 
P.L. 101-640, 28 Nov 1990, 
101st Cong., 2d sess. 
P.L. 102-580,31 Oct. 1992, 
102nd Cong., 2d sess. 
9-52

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(See Section 37 of Text) 
For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Report For Construction Maintenance 
Anclote River, FL 1974 $ 267,427 $ 911,160 
Aquatic Plant Control, FL 
(R&H Acts of 1958 & 1962) 1968 1,640,997 2_ 
Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, FL 1939 5,099,153 
Bayport, FL3 1972 58,524 4- 
Cedar Island, Keaton Beach, FL - - 54,969 
Cedar Keys Harbor, FL 1977 168,569 S 76,023 
Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, VI6 1964 303,317 58,595 
Clearwater Pass, FL2' 1980 46,349 ' 1,568,252 
Courtnay Channel, FL' 1940 22,846 26,779 
Crystal River, FL' 1941 25,000 152,208 
Everglades Harbor, FL' 1964 221,509 g 51,034 
Fajardo Harbor, PR3 1945 - - 
Guayanes Harbor, PR3 1945 - - 
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 
St. Marks to Tam a Bay, FL3 1974 38,850- 
Hillsboro Inlet, FL2 1965 - - 
Homosassa River, FL' 1937 3,999 9 26,454 
Horseshoe Cove, FL 1977 347,521 290,632 
Hudson River, FL3 1974 9,889- 
Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, FL3 1963 243,079 28,046 
Key West Harbor, FL 1972 1,548,892 'o 534,623 
Kissimmee River, FL' 1931 23,479 112,954 
Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, FL" 1931 10,276 9,035 
Largo Sound Channel, FL"' 1966 117,443 '3 51,149 
Little Manatee River, FL3" 1949 11,903 '4- 
Manatee River, FL15 1970 123,350 194,516 
New River, FL' 1956 36,518 31,296 
Orange River, FL' 1962 2,000 24,918 
Ozona, FL, channel and turning basin' 1963 105,527 15,089 
Palm Beach, FL, side channel and basin3 1946 - - 
Pass-A-Grille Pass, FL' 6 1966 41,297 " 60,686 
Pithlachascotee River, FL 1973 400,000 ' 261,401 
Rice Creek, FL' 1957 85,208 'y 18,814 
St. Petersburg Harbor, FL 1983 255,608 20 1,699,222 
St. Thomas Harbor, VI3 1949 1,989- 
Steinhatchee River, FL' 1940 135,053 63,473 
Suwannee River, FL'5 1977 76,418 22 256,731 
Withlacoochee River, FL'5 1969 614,912 3 520,462 
Complete. 
2 Excludes $1,640,997 contributed funds. 
3 Inactive. 
4 Includes $41,222 for reconnaissance and detailed project reports 
under Section 107 of the R&H Act of 1960. 
5 Includes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes 
$1,473 contributed funds. 
SProject as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 
1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in 
inactive status. 
SExcludes $42,783 contributed funds. 
g Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. 
9 In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. 
"o Includes $27,500 for new work under previous project. 
Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. 
" Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 
12 Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 
107 of 1960 R&H Act. 
3 Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes 
$86,716 expended from contributed funds. 
4 Expended on restudy. 
5 Inactive portion of project deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, 
Section 12. 
16 Authorized November 19, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under 
Section 107 of R&H Act of 1960. 
"7 Excludes $41,297 contributed funds. 
" Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. 
' Excludes $93,000 contributed funds. 
20 Includes $32,689 under previous project. 
~ Includes $20,532 under previous project. 
22 Includes $10,154 expended under previous project. 
4 Includes $30,000 expended under previous project. 
24 Authorized by Section 301, R&H Act of 1965 and Section 
107 of P.L. 101-640. 
9-53

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS 
(See Section 53 of Text) 
For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Report For Construction Maintenance 
Cape Florida State Park, FL 1969 $34,862 $ - 
El Tuque Beach, Ponce, PR 1985 1,396,730 
Lee County, FL 1971 
Punta Salinas, PR 1984 855,511 
Palm Beach County, FL, from Lake Worth Inlet to 
South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,140 6,257 
San Juan, PR 1965 
TABLE 9-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 63 of Text) 
For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Report For Construction Maintenance 
Arch Creek, Dade County, FL 1960 $66,485 ' 
Biscayne Bay, FL, Hurricane Protection 2 1966 - 
Hillsborough Bay, FL 2 1969 - 
Phillippi Creek Basin, FL 2 1966 - 
Excludes $11,734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project was authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under Section 
205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as modified by P.L. 685, 84th Congress. 
2 Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 
9-54

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-I CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL PROJECT 
DATA RELATIVE TO LOCK 
(See Section 5 of Text) 
Distance to nearest town 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and 
Intracoastal Waterway 
Name of nearest town Cocoa, FL 
Distance from Intracoastal Waterway 6.5 miles 
Lock dimensions 909 wide; 6009 long' 
Lift Varies with tide 
Depth of Sills (mlw, ocean) 14 feet 
Character of foundation Piles in sand 
Year completed and opened to navigation 1965 
Contract cost $2,979,670 
' 56x400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was with increased width. Operation and maintenance of lock is a 
constructed 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost Federal responsibility. 
($700,000). Length increased to 600 feet to be compatible 
TABLE 9-J CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT 
LOCKS AND DAMS 
(See Section 8 of Text) 
R.N. 
Henry H. Buckman Eureka Lock Bert Dosh Dunellon Inglis Lock 
Lock and Dam Lock Lock and Dam 
Nearest town Palatka, Sparr, Ocala, Dunnellon, Inglis, 
(miles) 11.2 15.8 8.9 2.5 3.2 
Miles from Atlantic 
Intracoastal 
Waterway 90.4 111.4 127.7 156.5 168.6 
Lock dimensions (ft.)' 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 
Normal lift (ft.) 20 20 0-15' 12-27 28 
Depth over sills at 
normal pool levels: 
Upper (ft.) 14 17 16-31' 16-31' 18 
Character of Piles in Piles in Piles in Rock Rock 
foundation sand sand sand 
Kind of dam Movable Movable None None Movable 
Type construction Earth3 Earth3 - - Earth3 
Percent complete 100 100 0 0 100 
Estimated contract 
cost $6,094,000 $7,975,000 $7,430,000 $9,500,000 $7,800,000 
Clear width and greatest available length. 
2 Pool level varies with natural ground water profile from 
minimum elevation of 40 feet to maximum elevation of 55 
feet. 
3 With concrete spillway and movable gates. 
9-55

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-K CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL 
OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 
(See Section 8 of Text) 
Work Performed 
Operation and Maintenance: 
Operations of service utilities 
Recreation management 
Water quality management 
Construction Management 
Sub-Total 
Maintenance: 
Maintenance of levees and floodwalls 
Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent 
operating equipment 
Construction Management 
Income Credits 
Sub-Total 
Grand Total 
9-56 
Cost 
$ -4,159 
-3,789 
-2,699 
-9,561 
$ -20,208 
16,614 
3,588
0 
$ 20,202 
$ (6)

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9 -L OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY 
OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 
(See Section 24 of Text) 
~WokPromdr 
Operations and Maintenance: 
Operations: 
Operations of locks, dams, and reservoirs 
Operation of service utilities 
Natural resource management 
Recreation management 
Condition and operation studies and activities 
Real estate management 
Construction Management 
Sub-Total 
Maintenance: 
Lands and damages 
Maintenance of locks 
Maintenance of levees and floodwalls 
Maintenance of recreational facilities 
Maintenance of permanent operating equipment 
non-recreational 
Channel and canal maintenance 
Engineering and Design 
Construction Management 
Income Credits 
Sub-Total 
Total 
$ 983,422 
223,744 
155,728 
341,299 
21,068 
42,175 
268,807 
2,036,243 
25,883 
618,361 
1,566 
79,880 
287,298 
18,570 
123,622 
116,354 
-5,092 
1,266,442 
$ 3,302,685 
9-57 
Work Performed Cost

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-M REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS 
IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA 
CONTROL OPERATIONS 
(See Section 30 of Text) 
Locality Cost 
Channel and canal maintenance 
Operation of service facilities 
OSHA medical exams 
Lands and damages 
Maintenance of non-recreational permanent operating equipment 
Engineering and Design 
Construction Management 
Total 
$ 3,048,587 
49,925 
-212,220 
244 
199,023 
350,185 
359,963 
$ 3,795,707 
9-58

TABLE 9-N CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT 
PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF LOCKS AND DAMS 
(See Section 55 of Text) 
Miles Elevation 
From Lock Normal of Normal Depth Character Kind Kind 
Nearest Nearest Dimensions lift Pool of sills of of of Percent Contract 
Town Town (ft.) (ft.) surface (ft.) (ft.) foundation Dam Construction Complete Cost 
W.P. � Fr__a _n_ _1k._1 lT i-n, _ At Olga 0 56 x 400 2.5 3.0 14 Piles in Movable Reinforced 100 $3,803,655 ~ I! . .. . .,. 
LOCK and Dam 
S-65 Lock 
S-65A Lock 
S-65B Lock 
S-65C Lock 
S-65D Lock 
S-65E Lock 
Moore Haven 
Lock (HGS-1 
Mod.) 
S-310 
(HGS-2 Mod.) 
S-193 
(HGS-6 Mod.) 
S-308B 
(Port Mayaca) 
S-57 
S-58 
S-59 
S-60 
S-61 
S-62 
S-63 
S-63A 
S-96 
S-96A 
S-53 
S-55 
S-157 
S-158 
Frostproof 
Avon Park 
Sebring 
Sebring 
Okeechobee 
Okeechobee 
Moore Haven 
Clewiston 
Okeechobee 
Pahokee 
Ashton 
Ashton 
Kissimmee 
Ashton 
St. Cloud 
Ashton 
Ashton 
Ashton 
Sebastian 
Sebastian 
Eau Gallie 
Christmas 
Sebastian 
Titusville 
23 
26 
20 
25 
14 
10 
0.5 
0.5 
0.5 
11 
9
5666 
10 
12 
14 
14 
16 
8 
12 
4 
15 
30 x 90 
30 x 90 
30 x 90 
30 x 90 
30 x 90 
30 x 90 
50 x 250 
50 x 60 
50 x 60 
56 x 400 
20 x 90 
20 x 90 
20 x 90 
20 x 90 
20 x 90 
20 x 90 
20 x 90 
20 x 90 
20 x 60 
20 x 60 
20 x 60 
20 x 60 
20 x 60 
20 x 60 
4.2 
6.3 
6.0 
7.2 
5.8 
4.6 
9.4 
5.0 
7.5 
4.0 
1.0 
2.0 
3.0 
2.0 
2.0 
3.0 
5.0 
4.5 
4.0 
7.5 
3.5 
10.0 
20.0 
4.5 
48.5 - 52.3 3 
46.3 
40.0 
34.0 
26.8 
21.0 
15.5 - 17.5 3 
15.5 - 17.5 3 
15.5 - 17.5 3 
15.5 - 17.5 3 
62.0 
64.0 
58.0 
64.0 
55.0 
61.0 
62.0 
57.0 
24.0 
25.0 
17.5 
14.0 
20.0 
4.0 
Operation and care of W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam (-79) is a Federal responsibility. 
Estimated (Oct 1990). 
u'0 
1) 
6
6
6
6
6
6 
11 
12.9 
7.5 
18 
6 
clay 
Earth 
foundation, 
sand 
Earth 
foundation, 
sand 
Earth 
foundation, 
sand 
Earth 
foundation, 
sand 
Earth 
foundation, 
sand 
Earth 
foundation, 
sand 
Piles in 
sand 
lockwalls 
Slab on 
sand 
Piles in 
sand and 
slab on sand 
Slab on 
sand 
Earth 
foundation, 
sand 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
Fixed 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
None 
concrete 
Reinforced 
concrete 
rigid frame 
Reinforced 
concrete 
rigid frame 
Reinforced 
concrete 
rigid frame 
Reinforced 
concrete 
rigid frame 
Reinforced 
concrete 
rigid frame 
Reinforced 
concrete 
Steel 
sheet pile 
Reinforced 
concrete 
Reinforced 
concrete 
Reinforced 
concrete 
Concrete and 
steel sheet 
pile 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
0 
100 
0 
100 
0
00 
10 
100 
000000000 
0
H
H
HH
H) 
H 3 
$1,211,465 
$1,531,490 
$1,068,397 
$1,357,246 
$1,242,909 
$1,320,040 
$433,000 
$3,448,406 
$615,000 2 
$8,308,700 
$2,355,000 2 
$2,355,000 
$2,349,000 2 
$2,355,000 2 
$2,355,000 2 
$689,217 ' 
$2,355,000 2 
$2,305,000 2 
$2,063,000 2 
$1,965,000 ' 
$1,908,000 ' 
$1,955,000 2 
$2,486,000 2 
$2,247,000 2

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT 
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
(See Section 55 of Text) 
Date transferred to 
Flood Control District 
Construction for Operation and 
Feature Period Maintenance 
Channels and Canals: 
Upper St. Johns S-254 Flowway October 1991 - September 1993 
Levees: 
Upper St. Johns L-74N (Part) September 1992 - September 1995 
Upper St. Johns Recreation September 1992 - September 1995 
Upper St. Johns L-74W September 1991 - September 1995 
Upper St. Johns L-75 (Remainder) September 1992 - September 1995 
Structures: 
Upper St. Johns S-250A, S-250B, 
S-250C & S-250D September 1991 - September 1994- 
Upper St. Johns S-256 & S-259 September 1992 - September 1994- 
TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT 
STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1995 
(See Section 55 of Text) 
Construction Approx. % 
Feature Started Complete 
Levees: 
Upper St. Johns L-74N (Part) September 1992 9 
Upper St. Johns L-75 January 1990 99 
Upper St. Johns L-79 (Flowway) September 1995 0 
Upper St. Johns L-75 Erosion Protection February 1995 80 
Upper St. Johns Site F - Malabar Rd. (Rec) September 1995 0 
9-60

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-Q CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT 
PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES 
(See Section 55 of Text) 
Depth Character 
Over of Year 
Gate1 Nearest Town Distance Sills Founda- Com- Actual 
No. Name (miles) (feet) tion pleted Cost 
2. Clewiston, FL 0.5 10 Pile 1935 $309,748 
3. Lake Harbor, FL 0.5 10 Rock 1935 316,938 
4. Belle Glade, FL 4.0 10 Rock 1935 350,025 
5. Canal Point, FL 0.0 10 Rock 1935 262,465 
6. Okeechobee, FL 0.5 7 Pile 1936 373,273 
'All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are constructed of concrete with steel sector gates and have no lift. 
Gate No. 6 has an auxiliary culvert spillway with automatic control. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. 
TABLE 9-R CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT 
LOCAL COOPERATION 
(See Section 55 of Text) 
Flood Control Act Work Authorized Cash Contribution1 
Jun. 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan 15.0 
Sep. 3, 1954 Second phase of comprehensive plan 20.0 
Jul. 14, 1960 Nicodemus Slough area 31.5 
Oct. 23, 1962 West Palm Beach Canal 66.3 
Boggy Creek Basin 29.7 
Shingle Creek Basin 25.9 
South Dade County area 19.2 
Reedy Creek Swamp 50.0 
Oct. 27, 1965 Southwest Dade County 46.0 
Hendry County area 19.5 
Aug. 13, 1968 Martin County 
Flood Control Features 34.0 
Irrigation Features 49.0 
Backflow Features 20.0 
P.L. 89-72 Recreation Features 50.0 
Water Resources - St. Lucie 20.0 
Recreation Features 50.0 
Approved Dec. 17, 1970 Navigation improvements suitable for 
under provisions of recreational craft 50.0 
Section 201 of 1965 
Flood Control Act 
(Deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990 
by P.L. 99-662) 
P.L. 99-662 Upper St. Johns River Basin - 
non-structural flood protection 25.0 
' Computed on total contract cost and supervision and 
administration except for Reedy Creek Swamp and Recreation 
Features which are computed on all costs, including engineering 
and design and land. 
9-61

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-S CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT 
OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 
(See Section 55 of Text) 
Work Performed 
New Work: 
Lands and damages 
Construction of 
Railroad bridges 
Channels and canals 
Breakwaters and Seawalls 
Levees 
Recreation 
Floodway control and diversion structures 
Pumping plants 
Buildings, grounds and utilities 
Permanent Operating Equipment 
Cultural Resource Preservation 
Feasibility 
Depreciation 
Engineering and Design 
Construction Management 
Total cost 
Operations: 
Operation of locks, dams, reservoirs and performance system 
Maintenance, buildings and grounds, operation of District 
communications network, repair and replacement of project signs 
Operation of levees and floodwalls 
Natural resource management 
Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, service 
and maintenance of traffic counters, master planning 
Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections, 
dam safety studies 
Water quality/water control studies, data collection, 
regulation of Lake Okeechobee and three conservation areas 
Energy conservation 
Real estate outgranting 
OSHA inspections 
Construction Management 
Sub-Total 
Maintenance: 
Maintenance of dams 
Maintenance of locks 
Natural resource facilities 
Maintenance of roads, railroads, and bridges 
Maintenance of levees and floodwalls 
Maintenance of recreational facilities 
Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent 
operating equipment 
Bank stabilization 
Utilities, supplies, and maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds 
Engineering and Design 
Construction Management 
Income credits 
Sub-Total 
Total 
Special recreation user fees 
$ 0
0 
48,010 
403,265 
1,798,912
0 
86,903
0000 
28,215
0 
6,023,451 
168,327 
$ 8,557,083 
1,316,163 
353,663 
465,938 
226,661 
253,900 
278,644 
1,359,763 
996 
2,062
0 
396,120 
$ 4,653,911 
53,329 
402,646
5 
4,441 
2,292,425 
1,443,853 
894,585 
57,113 
12,362 
1,813,017 
592,140
0 
$ 7,565,916 
$ 12,219,827 
$ 0 
9-62 
Cost

JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 
TABLE 9-T FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT 
CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1995 
(See Section 58 of Text) 
Date transferred to 
Construction Southwest Florida 
Feature Period for Operation and Maintenance 
Bridges: 
B-194 
Alteration of Facilities B-195 
B-594 
Alteration of Facilities B-196 
SCL RR Bridge, B-196 
Channels and Canals: 
C-135 
C-135, Sec. 1A 
C-135, Sec. 1B 
C-135, Sec. 1C & 2 
C-135, Sec. 3A 
C-135, Sec. 3B 
C-135, Sec. 4A 
C-136 
C-231, Phase I 
C-231, Phase II 
C-331 
C-531 
C-534 
C-135 
Structures: 
S-160 
S-161 
S-162 
S-353 
Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway 
S-551 
Levees: 
L-212, Sec. 1 
L-212, Sec. 2 
L-112 
L-112 & Floodway 
S-155 
S-163 
S-159 Middle & Lower 
S-159 Upper 
Recreation: 
Morris Bridge & 
Flint Creek Sites 
Dead River Sites 
Jul 1968 - Mar 1970 
May 1971 - Jan 1973 
Jan 1973 - Jan 1974 
Oct 1972 - Jan 1975 
Dec 1972 - Jul 1975 
May 1967 - Dec 1968 
Jul 1966 - Aug 1967 
May 1968 - Sep 1972 
Jan 1971 - Dec 1973 
Dec 1972 - Apr 1975 
Feb 1975 - Aug 1977 
Apr 1976 - Jan 1979 
Aug 1975 - May 1977 
Jul 1973 - Apr 1975 
Jul 1973 - Jan 1974 
Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 
Apr 1966 - Jan 1969 
Jun 1979 - Jul 1971 
Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 
May 1967 - Dec 1968 
Aug 1975 - May 1977 
Apr 1975 - Jun 1977 
Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 
Apr 1967 - Mar 1969 
Jul 1970 - Feb 1972 
Jun 1968 - Jul 1970 
Jul 1970 - Sep 1971 
Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 
May 1978 - Jul 1981 
May 1978 - Jul 1981 
May 1978 - Jul 1981 
Apr 1979 - Aug 1981 
Jun 1979 - Sep 1981 
Dec 1982 - Aug 1984 
Mar 1985 - Jul 1986 
Not transferred 
Do. 
Do. 
Do. 
Jul 1975 
Dec 1968 
Oct 1967 
Not transferred 
Not transferred 
Oct 1977 
Not transferred 
Not transferred 
Nov 1977 
Dec 1975 
Dec 1975 
Sep 1968 
Apr 1969 
Nov 1971 
Dec 1968 
Nov 1977 
Apr 1977 
Nov 1968 
Dec 1975 
Not transferred 
Dec 1975 
Dec 1975 
Oct 1980 
Jan 1983 
Jan 1983 
Jan 1983 
Oct 1981 
Jan 1985 
Dec 1986 
9-63

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 9-U FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT 
MOSS BLUFF LOCK 
(See Section 58 of Text) 
Nearest town 
Name of nearest town 
Distance above mouth of river 
Lock dimensions 
Normal lift 
Elevation of normal pool surface 
Depth of sills 
Character of foundation 
Kind of dam 
Type of construction 
Percent complete 
Estimated cost (including dam and spillway) 
20 miles 
Ocala, FL 
65.5 miles 
30 x 125 feet 
18.0 feet 
58 feet 
12 feet 
Piles in sand 
None 
Reinforced concrete 
100 
$1,990,138 
TABLE 9-V FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, 
(PREAUTHORIZATION) 
(See Section 64 of Text) 
Study Identification Period Costs 
Detailed Project Report: 
Bradenton Beach, FL 
Cedar Creek, Jax, FL 
Cedar Hammock, Bradenton, FL 
Cyril E. King Road, St. Thomas, VI 
Estate Mon Bijou, St. Croix, VI 
Goodbys Creek, Jax, FL 
Government Center - N. Miami Bch, FL 
Hwy 187, El Terraplen 
Itchapackasassa Creek, Polk Co., FL 
LaGrange Gut,Frederiksted, St. Croix, VI 
Juan Mendez Channel, PR 
Ortega River, FL 
Pottsburg Creek, Jax, FL 
Quebrada Blasinia, PR 
Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta, Santiago, PR 
Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR 
Rio Coamo, Parcelas Valezquez, PR 
Rio Cidra, La Playita, PR 
Rio Culebrinas, Aguada, PR 
Rio Culebras, Aguada, PR 
Rio Descalabrada, Santa Isabel, PR 
Rio El Ojo De Agua, PR 
Rio Fajardo, PR 
Rio Guamani, Guayama, PR 
Rio Jacaguas at Juana Dizz, PR 
Rio Loco, Guanica, PR 
Rio Manati, Barceloneta, PR 
Rio Nigua, Arroyo, PR 
Rio Patillas, PR 
Rio Yauco, Yauco, PR 
Sabana Grande, PR 
Savan Gut, St. Thomas, VI 
Soto Town, St. Thomas, VI 
Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, VI 
W. Maule Lake - N. Miami Bch, FL 
Wahneta Canal, Polk Co., FL 
West Palm Beach, M-Canal, FL 
Whitaker Bayou, FL 
259,831 
69,745 
(7,726) 
9,483 
22,433 
141 
7,862 
861 
57,738 
200,351 
49,801 
20 
252 
29,741 
240,526 
1,399,819 
13,113 
646 
73,786 
7,843 
57,838 
125,231 
22,156 
87,259 
40,045 
23,092 
108,599 
242 
17,699 
4,969 
3,106 
68,245 
14,138 
68,761 
13,477 
6,893 
4,986 
3,823 
9-64

MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT *
This district comprises a small portion of southeastern 
Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of 
Alabama south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern 
Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern 
Louisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the 
Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River Basin, to and 
including the Pascagoula River Basin. The Pearl River 
IMPROVI 
Navigation Page 
1. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA .............. 10-3 
1A. Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL ..................... 10-3 
1 B. Coosa River, Montgomery to 
Gadsden, AL ................................................ 10-4 
2. Apalachicola Bay, FL.................................... 10-4 
3. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and 
Flint Rivers, AL, FL & GA........................... 10-4 
3A. George W. Andrews Lock and 
Dam, AL & GA ........................................... 10-5 
4. Aquatic Plant Control 
(R & H Act of 1965)....................................10-6 
5. Bayou Coden, AL ........................................ 10-6 
6. Bayou La Batre, AL ..................................... 10-7 
7. Biloxi Harbor, M S ....................................... 10-7 
8. Black Warrior and Tombigbee 
Rivers, AL ................................................... 10-8 
8A. Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL ......... 10-9 
8B. Oliver Lock and Dam 
(Replacement), AL ....................................... 10-9 
9. Bon Secour River, AL ............................... 10-10 
10. Dauphin Island, AL ................................... 10-10 
11. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL........................... 10-10 
12. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico 
into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL .................... 10-11 
13. Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL ............................ 10-11 
14. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between 
Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border .... 10-11 
15. Gulfport Harbor, MS.... ............ 10-12 
16. Mobile Harbor, AL .................................. 10-13 
17. Panama City Harbor, FL .......................... 10-13 
18. Pascagoula Harbor, MS ........................... 10-14 
19. Pensacola Harbor, FL..................... 10-15 
20. Perdido Pass Channel, AL ....................... 10-15 
21. Tennessee-Tombigbee 
Waterway, AL & MS ............................... 10-15 
Basin, Mississippi was included as part of the Mobile 
District until October 1, 1981, when responsibilities were 
transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi 
Valley Division. A section of the Gulf Intracoastal Water 
from St. Marks, Florida, to Lake Borgne Light No. 29, 
Louisiana is also within Mobile District. 
EMENTS 
Page 
21A. Tennessee-Tombigbee 
Wildlife Mitigation, AL & MS .................. 10-16 
22. Other Authorized 
Navigation Projects ..................................... 10-17 
23. Other Authorized Beach Erosion 
Control Project............................................ 10-17 
24. Other Authorized Flood 
Control Project............................................ 10-17 
25. Navigation Work Under 
Special Authorization ................................ 10-17 
26. Flood Control Work Under 
Special Authorization ................................ 10-17 
27. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ..... 10-17 
Flood Control 
28. Bayview Court, 
Bay St. Louis, M S ...................................... 10-17 
29. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers 
Elba and Geneva, AL.................................. 10-17 
30. County Road 55 
Etowah Co., AL ......................................... 1 0-18 
31. Dauphin Island Shoreline, AL ................... 1 0-18 
32. East End 
Dauphin Island, AL ................................... 10-18 
33. Eslava Creek, 
Mobile, AL ................................................. 10-18 
34. Gadsden-Water Treatment Plant 
Gadsden, AL ............................................ 10-19 
35. Hancock County Seawall, 
Hancock County, MS ............................... 10-19 
36. North Beach Boulevard, 
Bay St. Louis, MS .................................... 1 0-19 
37. Okatibbee Lake, MS ................................ 10-19 
38. Portersville Bay-East, 
M obile Co., AL ........................................... 10-20

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Flood Control Page 
39. Portersville Bay-West, 
Mobile Co., AL ........................................... 10-20 
40. Sowashee Creek, 
M eridian, M S ............................................. 10-20 
41. Tallahalla Creek, 
Laurel, M S ................................................. 10-21 
42. Threemile Creek, 
M obile, AL ................................................ 10-21 
43. Tombigbee River Bridge #6, 
M onroe Co., M S ........................................ 10-21 
44. Tombigbee River 
(East Fork), MS & AL...........................10-22 
45. Tombigbee River and 
Tributaries, MS & AL ................................. 10-22 
46. Upper Gordon Creek, 
Hattiesburg, M S ......................................... 10-22 
47. Village Creek, 
Birmingham, AL .................................... 10-23 
48. Waveland Seawall 
W aveland, M S ........................................... 10-23 
49. Flood Control Work 
Under Special Authorization ..................... 10-23 
50. Inspection of Completed 
Flood Control Projects ............................... 10-23 
51. Other Authorized 
Flood Control Projects ............................... 10-24 
Multiple Purpose Power Projects 
52. Allatoona Dam 
Coosa River Basin, GA ............................. 10-24 
53. Buford Dam, 
Lake Sidney Lanier, GA ............................ 10-24 
54. Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA ................ 10-25 
55. Jim Woodruff Lock and 
Dam, FL & GA .......................................... 10-25 
56. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL ............ 10-26 
57. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL......... 10-26 
58. Walter F. George Lock and 
Dam, AL & GA ....................................... 10-27 
Miscellaneous 
Miscellaneous ...................................................... Page 
60. Scheduling Flood Control 
Reservoir Operations .................................. 10-28 
61. Flood Control and Coastal 
Emergencies (FC&CE) .............................. 10-28 
62. National Emergency Preparedness 
Program (NEPP) ........................................ 10-28 
63. Regulatory Functions Program .................. 10-28 
General Investigations 
64. 
65. 
66. 
67. 
Surveys ...................................................... 10-28 
Collection and Study of Basic Data............10-28 
Preconstruction Engineering and Design .... 10-28 
Rivers and Harbors 
Contributed Funds ..................................... 10-29 
Tables 
Table 10-A 
Table 10-B 
Table 10-C 
Table 10-D 
Table 10-E 
Table 10-G 
Table 10-H 
Table 10-J 
Table 10-K 
Table 10-L 
Table 10-M 
Table 10-N 
Table 10-0 
Table 10-P 
59. West Point Lake, 
Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & GA ...... 10-27 
10-2 
Cost & Financial Statement ........... 10-30 
Authorizing Legislation ................. 10-37 
Other Authorized 
Navigation Projects ......................... 10-48 
Other Authorized Beach Control 
Erosion Control Project ................. 10-48 
Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects ............................. 10-49 
Deauthorized Projects .................... 10-50 
Navigation Work Under 
Special Authorization .................... 10-50 
Flood Control Work Under 
Special Authorization .................... 10-51 
Reconnaisssance and Condition 
Surveys .......................................... 10-52 
Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA 
Development Proposed Under 
Existing Project............................... 10-52 
Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint 
Rivers, AL, GA, & FL, Locks and Dams 
and Multiple-Purpose Development 
Included in Existing Projects ......... 10-53 
Black Warrior and Tombigbee 
Rivers, AL ..................................... 10-54 
Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, 
AL & M S ....................................... 10-55 
Completed Flood Insurance Studies 
And Flood Hazard Information Reports 
For FY 1985 Thru FY 1995 ........... 10-56

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
Navigation 
1. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, 
AL AND GA 
Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above 
Montgomery, Alabama, by the junctions of the Coosa and 
Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through 
Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River 
about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestern Alabama, to 
form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for 
central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed 
at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of 
the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources 
in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome 
the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and 
Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near 
Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to 
form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for 
northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest 
Georgia.) 
Previous project. Projects for Alabama River: for details 
see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual 
Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. 
Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual 
Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 
594, Annual Report for 1944. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for full 
development of the Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries 
for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other 
purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief 
of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be 
advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. 
(See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 
83rd Congress, suspended authorization of the comprehensive 
plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric 
power for Coosa River, to permit non-Federal interests to 
develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams 
in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to 
Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other 
provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public 
law. The plan was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to 
authorize planning, engineering and design for the project 
generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design 
Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. The 
present phase of improvement includes the construction of 
Robert F. Henry and Millers Ferry multiple-purpose 
improvements, Claiborne Lock and Dam, and supplemental 
channel work providing for a nine-foot deep navigation 
channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, 
Alabama, and construction of Carters Dam, a multiplepurpose 
improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. 
Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will 
be determined as formulation of plans for development of 
projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation 
has been initiated. 
Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the river a natural 
landing connects with city streets at Montgomery. Wofford 
Oil Company has a small wharf about 10 miles below 
Montgomery equipped for handling petroleum products. There 
are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities 
and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate 
for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging of the river 
system at a cost of $3,022,719. General charges for water 
control management, condition surveys, engineering and 
design, supervision and administration amounted to 
$1,003,731. Claiborne Lock and Dam charges were $791,891 
with recreation and resource management costs of $474,725. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated 
on Carters Dam in April 1962, on Millers Ferry Lock and 
Dam in April 1962, on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 
1963, Claiborne Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Robert F. 
Henry Lock and Dam in March 1966. Carters Dam was 
completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation 
channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in 
January 1972. Overall construction is complete in Millers Ferry 
Lock and Dam. Construction of Robert F. Henry Lock and 
Dam is complete. Total Federal cost of the existing project as 
of September 30, 1995 is $98,259,133, including $3,245,400 
for new work and $95,013,733 for maintenance. (See Table 
10-L.) 
1A. CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, AL 
Location. The site is in Monroe County at mile 81.8 on 
the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroeville and 
5.7 miles upstream from the U.S. Highway 84 bridge. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a short 
earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest 
and gated spillway extending across the river channel and 
into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left 
bank, and an earth dike extending across the left overbank to 
high ground. Normal upper pool is elevation 35 and the 
minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for 
reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60- 
mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume 
of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description of 
Alabama-Coosa projects. 
10-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the lock and 
dam totaled $742,563. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of 
$27,997,450. Recreation attendance during FY 1995 totaled 
216,000 visits. 
lB. COOSA RIVER, MONTGOMERY 
TO GADSDEN, AL 
Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major 
tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles 
northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the 
juncture of the Etowah and Ooostanaula Rivers in northwest 
Georgia, it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with 
the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. 
Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama-Coosa 
River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by 
Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in 
House Document 320, transmitted to Congress on January 
27, 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the 
Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished 
after the waterway to Montgomery was assured. The plan of 
improvement identified in House Document 320 provided 
for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to 
Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The 
waterway to Montgomery has essentially been completed. 
The plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway 
between Montgomery and Gadsden was further modified by 
the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and 
design for the project generally in accordance with the plans 
contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, 
dated May 1982. Total Federal cost of the existing project as 
of September 30, 1995 is $14,986,400 for new work. 
2. APALACHICOLA BAY, FL 
Location. The project is on the coast of northwest Florida 
160 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic 
Survey Chart 11401.) 
Previous project. For details, see page 1833, Annual 
Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 
channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth 
in Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 
feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width 
to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 
10-foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties 
extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; 
(b) an inner bar channel, 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, in 
Apalachicola Bay; (c) a boat basin 200 feet by 880 feet and 9 
feet deep at Apalachicola, Florida, with a connecting channel 
9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to 
Apalachicola River; (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 
10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a 
channel generally parallel to the shore at Eastpoint, Florida, 
6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, and a 
connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at 
the same depth in St. George Sound, with twin breakwaters 
on either side parallel to the shore and having a total length 
of 5,300 feet; (f) a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide 
through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with 
St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about 
one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, 
Florida, with a 6-foot by 100-foot connecting channel to water 
of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. Mean range of tide 
throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except 
during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean 
low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully 
complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pile-and-timber 
wharves which are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Jetty maintenance $420,341, dredging 
$91,682 and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $39,766. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, 
authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed 
in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for 
approved work, as authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor 
Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications 
authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. 
Construction of the breakwater and channel improvements 
authorized in 1975 at Two Mile was completed in September 
1977. Construction of breakwaters at Eastpoint authorized 
in 1983 was completed in March 1984. Total Federal cost 
under existing project as of September 30, 1995 is $2,033,461 
for new work and $5,035,361 for maintenance, a total of 
$7,068,822. 
3. APALACHICOLA, 
CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT 
RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL 
Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the 
southwest corner of the State of Georgia by the junction of 
the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers and flows south 108 miles 
emptying into Apalachicola Bay. Florida River enters the 
Apalachicola from the east at mile 45.4 and the River Styx 
also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters 
10-4

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
rom the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey 
Thart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises 
n northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, 
md thence southerly to join the Flint River at the southwest 
:orner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See 
3eological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint 
liver, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows 
;enerally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to 
he southwest corner of the State, where it joins the 
Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See 
3eological Survey maps for southwest Georgia. 
Previous project. For details see page 484 of Annual 
Zeport for 1963. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for 
Ievelopment of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint 
livers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and 
recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist 
f a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola 
liver from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 
:o the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, 104 
miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee 
diver, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint 
river, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the Flint 
river from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence 
i channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage to 
MVontezuma, Georgia, 79 miles to be accomplished by 
Iredging, contract works, and construction of three locks and 
Jams (Jim Woodruff, George W. Andrews, and Walter F. 
3eorge) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose 
Jams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River. 
Three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer 
Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the Flint River were 
Jeauthorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986. The project also provides for minor improvements of 
:ertain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River, including 
a 9-foot by 100-foot side channel, approximately 2,000 feet 
long, from Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River 
Industrial Park at Blountstown, Fla. Plane side of reference 
is mean low water. Hydropower and flood control storage 
are provided at Sidney Lanier, Walter F. George, and West 
Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. For 
further details see Annual Report for 1962. The project was 
originally authorized in section 2 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1945, was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 
(P.L. 99-662). (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 
1.6 feet. At the point where the river is formed the variation 
between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the 
Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high 
water is about 20 feet, and extreme fluctuation is 65.3 feet at 
Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage 
due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low 
and high water is about 21.5 feet. A Comprehensive Basin 
Study is currently being conducted on the Apalachicola, 
Chattahoochee, Flint (ACF), and Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa 
(ACT) River Systems. 
Local cooperation. The six Florida Counties that originally 
served as local sponsors for the Florida portion of the 
waterway have all informed the District in writing that they 
no longer wish to serve as local sponsors. The State of Florida 
has also declined assumption of responsibilities of local 
sponsorship. At this time no items of local cooperation are 
being complied with. No local sponsors are required for the 
Alabama and Georgia portions of the waterway. 
Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in 
addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, 
Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings 
along the entire system for launching small craft. For details 
of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for 
existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See 
also Table 10-M on locks and dams and multiple-purpose 
development included in existing project. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system cost 
$2,234,159. George W. Andrews Lake recreational and 
resource management costs totaled $313,128. Operation and 
maintenance of George W. Andrews Lock and Dam cost 
$739,187. All other costs for the project amounted to 
$1,788,366. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Improvement of 
Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide project 
dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction 
on Lake Sidney Lanier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and 
Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Walter F. George Lock 
and Dam and West Point are complete. Channel rectification 
in Apalachicola River was completed December 1970. More 
detailed information concerning condition at the end of fiscal 
year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose 
developments comprising the system is presented under their 
respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Total Federal 
cost under existing project as of September 30, 1995 is 
$4,452,162 for new work and $109,132,591 for maintenance, 
a total of $113,584,753. (See Tables 10-A and 10-M for fiscal 
year costs and summaries of overall project.) 
3A. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND 
DAM, AL AND GA 
Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 
46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town 
10-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff 
Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast 
Alabama). The pool extends up the navigation channel about 
28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. 
Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for 
a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into 
the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national 
geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 
280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic 
datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 
82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 
13 feet over the lower sill and 19 over the upper sill at normal 
pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The 
project provides for maintenance and care. The House 
Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 
1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers 
for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the 
Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, 
construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and 
Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of 
the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, 
Chattahoochee, and Flint River system. (See Table 10-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all 
movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and 
hold the United States free from damages. These conditions 
are being complied with. 
Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a 
public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo 
and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading dock. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock and dam 
cost $673,378. Maintenance cost included under overall 
Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint project. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock 
and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in 
November 1963 at a total cost of $13,038,427. (See also Table 
10-M). 
4. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER 
AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) 
Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting 
channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for 
management and control of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, 
Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic 
plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, 
connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United 
States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, 
drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public 
health, and related purposes, including continued research 
for development of the most effective and economical control 
measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under 
the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation 
with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning 
cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United 
States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation). 
Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and 
save the United States free from claims that may occur from 
control operations and to participate to the extent of 50 percent 
of such operations. Requirements are being met in the state 
of Alabama by the Department of Conservation and Natural 
Resources. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Water quality 
studies and overhead amounted to $4,114. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under 
the exiting project as of September 30, 1995 is $845,887. 
Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 
5. BAYOU CODEN, AL 
Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on 
the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into 
Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, 
the southern tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. 
(See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) 
Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, 
page 843. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for a 
channel 8 feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle 
Avenue bridge south for about 3,000 feet through the bayou 
to Portersville Bay, thence 8 feet deep by 100 feet wide 
extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay 
to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a turning 
basin 8 feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west 
side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle 
Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, 
except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean 
low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned timber dock 
piles used in connection with fishing industry in this locality 
are adequate for existing commerce. A small ship building 
facility is located near the upper limits of the channel. The 
marina which will accommodate about 12 small 
10-6

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster 
shells are located near the mouth of the bayou, and are 
maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Water Control Management, survey and other 
miscellaneous cost amounted to $51,620. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. That portion of the project 
authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 
1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated March 
31, 1975 and completed March 26, 1976. Total Federal cost 
under existing project as of September 30, 1995 is $330,701 
for new work and $1,225,895 for maintenance, a total of 
$1,556,596. Contributed funds expended for new work 
amount to $100,000 and $50,000 for maintenance. 
6. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL 
Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles 
long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southern coast 
of Mobile County, AL., about 10 miles northwest of Cedar 
Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of 
Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) 
Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, 
page 844. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for a 18- 
foot by 120-foot channel from Pascagoula Ship channel, 
connecting with the GIWW, along the GIWW alignment, 
connecting with an extension of the previous 12-foot channel 
alignment, through Mississippi Sound to the mouth of the 
bayou, a total distance of approximately 20 miles; then 
provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel to a point about 
2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 
feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, with the channel 
widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a 
turning basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. 
Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990, 
the plan of improvement is to deepen channel to 18-foot by 
100-foot from the mouth through the turning basin, a distance 
of about 1.8 miles; deepen channel from turning basin to 0.29 
miles above highway 188 bridge to 14-feet by 75-feet, a 
distance of about 0.89 miles; extend a 14-foot by 50-foot 
channel from turning basin into Snake Bayou for about 730 
feet and a 12-foot by 50-foot channel within Snake Bayou 
about 790 feet. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, 
except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean 
low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided 
at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are 
available. Several boatways for construction of small seagoing 
vessels are also available. Facilities are adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Engineering and design cost $62,193; and 
supervision and administration amounted to $12,413. A total 
Federal cost of $74,606 for new work. 
Maintenance: Condition Surveys and miscellaneous cost 
$10,175. Dredging cost $16,988. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was 
modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority 
of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The 
project was completed in March 1967. The contract for 
deepening the Sound Channel was completed in May 1994. 
The construction of the Bayou Channel is scheduled for 
completion in September 1997. Total Federal cost under 
existing project as of September 30, 1995 is $3,882,924 for 
new work and $4,076,590 for maintenance, a total of 
$7,959,514. Contributed funds from local interests for new 
work amount to $461,230. 
7. BILOXI HARBOR, MS 
Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in 
southeastern Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of 
Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport 
Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 
11373.) 
Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report 
for 1962. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for a 
continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles 
long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Mississippi 
Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes 
Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport lake, including a 500-foot 
by 2,600-foot basin in the lake, thence a 12-foot deep by 100- 
foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the 
west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot 
basin; a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the main channel 
in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil 
terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12-foot by 150-foot spur channel 
from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, 
terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot turning basin opposite 
Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12-by 150- 
foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south 
waterfront; a 10-foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi 
Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects 
to the 12-foot by 150-foot lateral channel at Biloxi's south 
waterfront. Construction for the modifications lateral channel 
authorized by River and Harbor Act of November 7, 1966 
10-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in February 1975. 
Further modifications to the project were authorized by the 
Chief of Engineers on March 28, 1979, which provided for a 
channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long 
extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and 
into a rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet, for 
use by commercial small craft, and an East Harrison County 
Canal project which provides for a 12-foot project depth, 130- 
feet wide and about 2,100 feet long, and a 300 by 300 foot 
turning basin also to a 12-foot project depth. This work was 
completed in April 1980. 
Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and 
Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the project 
providing for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, 
and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized 
by the 1945 River and Harbor Act, is inactive. Estimated cost 
(1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-andtimber 
piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline 
terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are 
available. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Dredging cost $1,301,931 and condition 
surveys cost $81,354. Water Quality Studies, and 
miscellaneous costs totaled $28,611. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior 
to the modification authorized in 1966, was commenced in 
1931 and completed in 1962. The 1966 modification was 
completed in FY 1975. The 1979 modification was completed 
in 1980. Total Federal cost under existing project as of 
September 30, 1995 is $1,431,919 for new work and 
$12,931,189 for maintenance, a total of $14,363,108. 
Contributed funds for new work amount to $102,600. 
Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $238,640. 
8. BLACK WARRIOR AND 
TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL 
Location. Black Warrior River rises in northern Alabama 
above Birmingham and flows generally southwesterly to unite 
with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence 
the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River 
to form the Mobile River 45 miles above the head of Mobile 
Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to vicinity of 
Birmingham is about 430 miles. 
Previous project. For details see page 732, Annual Report 
for 1938. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for a 
channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the 
Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of 
Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, 
to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork 
and mile 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by 
snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw 
Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The 
total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. 
The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams and 
18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original 
structures with new 110-by 600-foot locks and dams, under 
the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon 
Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Armistead I. Selden 
replaced locks 8 and 9; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 
7; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks 1, 2, and 3; and Holt 
replaced locks 13, 14, 15, and 16. Thus, 16 of the original 
locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock 
and Dam (Lock 17) rehabilitation to replace the original 
double lift lock with a single lift lock was completed in 1980. 
The Coffeeville Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 
1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along 
its boundaries. A replacement lock for the old Oliver Lock 
located 2,300 feet downstream has been completed. The 
replacement lock has dimensions of 110 feet by 600 feet. A 
fixed crest spillway extends 800 feet across the river. 
Minimum provision was provided to allow construction of a 
hydropower plant. (See Table 10-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles 
to Coffeeville Lock and Dam, where tidal effect is apparent 
only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and 
extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These 
are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The 
greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the 
maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other 
points are 40 feet at old lock 1, which is 100.6 miles from 
Mobile; 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 
13 feet at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet 
at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations 
at these points are at old lock 1, 20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 
feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at 
Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the 
amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. 
Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation 
have been fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling 
equipment have been provided as required at most loading 
and unloading points along the waterway. These include 
facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, 
10-8

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufacturers, and various 
other commodities. While most terminal facilities are 
privately owned, many are available for use by the general 
public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Contract dredging of the river system cost 
$6,643,330. Condition surveys cost $1,299,299. Engineering 
and design cost $759,809. Supervision, administration and 
other general charges for the overall river project totaled 
$1,607,198. Natural Resources Management and Recreation 
cost $2,594,497. Recreation attendance FY 1995 totaled 
3,644,000 visits. 
Other O&M costs for the system include: Coffeeville Lock 
and Dam, $1,930,370; Demopolis Lock and Dam, $599,579; 
Selden Lock and Dam, $864,142; Oliver Lock and Dam, 
$744,010; Bankhead Lock and Dam, $1,261,224; Holt Lock 
and Dam, $713,478. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the project, 
commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since 
then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11 and 12) 
were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Lock 
and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; 
four original lock and dams (4, 5, 6 and 7) were replaced by 
Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation 
in August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were 
replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to 
navigation in October 1957; three original locks and dams 
(1,2 and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville Lock and Dam which 
was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original 
locks and dams (13, 14, 15 and 16) were replaced by Holt 
Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. 
Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock 
and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed 
February 6, 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a 
single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam 
commenced in April 1970 and was completed in 1980. The 
power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam and Holt 
Lock and Dam, was built and is operated by the Alabama 
Power Co. Construction of the new Oliver Lock and Dam is 
completed with the new lock open to traffic as of July 1991. 
Project construction began in November 1986 and is 
scheduled for completion in January 1996. Total Federal cost 
under existing project as of September 30, 1995 is 
$88,461,935 for new work and $320,266,684 for maintenance, 
and $52,292,880 and major rehabilitation, a total of 
$461,021,499. 
8A. JACKSON PORT, JACKSON, AL 
Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River 
in Clarke County in southwest Alabama in the city of Jackson, 
Alabama, approximately 90 miles north of Mobile, Alabama. 
Existing project. None. The authorized Port would be 
located on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System, which 
is a federally authorized 9 by 300 feet navigation project 
connecting Birmingham, Alabama with the Port of Mobile. 
In conjunction with the realignment project on the existing 
navigation project, the district has been directed to construct 
a spur canal to serve as a port at Jackson. 
Local cooperation. Local Cooperation Agreement 
requirements have not been determined. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Engineering and design $149,972; and 
supervision and administration $25,121. A total Federal cost 
of $175,093 for new work. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of the Design 
Memorandum is currently underway and is scheduled to be 
approved in October 1998. Design (P&S) is scheduled for 
completion in January 1999. Total Federal cost under existing 
project to September 30, 1995 is $1,079,069. 
8B. OLIVER LOCK AND DAM 
(REPLACEMENT), AL 
Location. The project is located at mile 337.7 on the Black 
Warrior-Tombigbee River System at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 
Existing project. The existing navigation facilities on the 
Black Warrior and Tombigbee include six (6) locks having a 
total lift of 255 feet. Each of the locks have chamber 
dimensions of 110 by 600 feet. Original work on the waterway 
was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1884. The 17 
original locks have been replaced by the existing six (6) locks. 
Prior to this year, Oliver Lock was the only lock in the system 
with chamber dimensions of 95 by 460 feet. 
Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986, the plan of improvement was to replace Oliver Lock 
and Dam at a new location 2,300 feet downstream. The 
replacement lock with chamber dimensions by 110 by 600 
feet was opened to traffic in July 1991. The fixed crest 
spillway, extends 800 feet across the river. Minimum 
provisions are being provided to allow construction of a 
hydropower plant. Land Acquisition is complete. 
Construction was initiated in November 1986 with the award 
of the Alabama Power Company relocation contract. The first 
stage cofferdam and river diversion contract was awarded in 
February 1987 and the lock and dam construction contract 
was awarded in March 1988. For other information see 
description of Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers project. 
Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not 
required. One-half of the total cost of construction of the 
10-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
navigation lock and dam will be paid by amounts appropriated 
from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Real Estate activities $104,297; construction 
contracts $1,548,402; engineering and design $78,773; and 
$98,474 for supervision and administration and miscellaneous 
expenditures. A total Federal cost of $1,829,946 for new work. 
Contributed funds expended in FY 1995 totaled $1,807,852. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 99% 
complete and scheduled completion date for the entire project 
is January 1996, at an estimated cost of $125,000,000. Total 
Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost under existing project to 
September 30, 1995 is $60,607,330 for new work. Contributed 
funds (Inland Waterways Trust) expended total $61,557,044. 
9. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL 
Location. Rises 2 miles south of Foley, Ala., and flows 
southerly about 8 miles, emptying into Bon Secour Bay, an 
arm of Mobile Bay in southwest Alabama. 
Existing project. A 10- by 80-foot channel from Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of 
Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swifts 
Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point about 600 
feet above Oak Landing with two turning and maneuvering 
areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite 
Swifts Landing and ice loading dock. Also a 10 by 80 foot 
South Fork channel from the intersection with the Bon Secour 
channel, 1.14 miles to a 150 x 150 foot turning basin. Plane 
of reference is mean low water. Overall length of improvement 
is about 4.7 miles. Mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and 
extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project 
was authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 16, 1963, under 
authority in Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. A number of pile-and-timber marginal 
wharves used by the seafood industry and a marine ways are 
located along the existing project. These, together with 
numerous privately owned piers, are considered adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: None. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced 
in July and completed in October 1964. Total Federal cost 
under existing project as of September 30, 1995 is $150,615 
for new work and $1,364,445 for maintenance, a total of 
$1,515,060. Contributed funds for new work amounted to 
$9,700. 
10. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL 
Location. The project is located between Dauphin and 
Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to 
Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 
55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic 
Survey Chart 11376.) 
Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 
channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an 
anchorage basin of the same depth, and about 7 acres in area, 
in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a 
channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage 
basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to 
protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 
feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with 
an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 
8,300 feet long, extending to the 7-foot hydrographic contour 
in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and 
extreme, except during storms is about 4 feet. Plane of 
reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation 
have been fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for 
handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier 
for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A 
marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers 
are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous cost 
$7,607. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed 
in July 1959. Total Federal cost under existing project as of 
September 30, 1995 is $292,864 for new work and $2,466,045 
for maintenance, a total of $2,758,909. 
11. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL 
Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams 
emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, 
respectively, south of central Mobile (See Coast and Geodetic 
Survey Chart 11376.) 
Existing project. The Dog River project provides for a 7 
by 100-foot channel with a total length of 4.5 miles to provide 
access to the Mobile ship channel. 
The Fowl River project provides for a channel 8 feet deep 
and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River 
10-10

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
to deep water about 6,700 feet above its mouth. Total length 
of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean 
low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. 
Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment 
of the project was completed in November 1973. (See Table 
10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a boatyard 
for fabricating steel vessel hulls, nine marinas, four marine 
ways, a yacht basin on Dog River; two marinas on Fowl River, 
and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities 
are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Water Control Management and 
miscellaneous cost $9,724. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing Fowl River 
portion of the project was commenced in August 1973 and 
completed in November 1973. Work on the Dog River channel 
realignment was initiated and completed during FY 1986. 
Total Federal cost on the existing project as of September 
30, 1995 is $3,350,352; $391,354 for new work and 
$2,958,998 for maintenance. Contributed funds for new work 
amounted to $195,250. 
12. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM 
GULF OF MEXICO INTO 
CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL 
Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance 
from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of 
Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola 
Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews 
Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11388.) 
Previous project For details see page 672 of Annual 
Report for 1937. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for a 12- 
foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into 
Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 10-foot channel from 
East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists 
also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the 
seaward end. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, 
except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean 
low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation 
have been complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-and-timber 
piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this 
locality are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Jetty maintenance was $389,524 and 
dredging cost amounted to $18,170. Condition surveys, 
supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs 
totaled $233,975. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1965 
modification was commenced October 1967 and completed 
January 1969. Total Federal cost under existing project as of 
September 30, 1995 is $916,715 for new work and 
$10,980,739 for maintenance, a total of $11,897,454. 
Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount 
to $398,000. 
13. FLY CREEK, AL 
Location. Fly Creek (Volanta Bayou) is a small stream 
about 4.5 miles long rising in Baldwin County, Alabama, 3 
miles east of town of Fairhope, from whence it flows northerly, 
thence westerly and southerly, to form an estuary on eastern 
shore of Mobile Bay just north of Fairhope and about 13 
miles southeast of Mobile, Alabama. (See U.S. Coast and 
Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11376.) 
Existing project Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 
feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in 
Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide 
and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. Mean tidal range in vicinity 
of project is about 1.3 feet, and extreme, except during storms, 
is 3.5 feet. 
Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor 
Act of May 17, 1950, (H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., I1st Sess.). 
The project document contains the latest published map. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Fairhope Yacht Club has facilities for 
small recreational craft on the south bank near mouth of creek, 
consisting of a pile-and-timber service wharves, several sheet 
metal boat sheds, boat slips, and other mooring facilities. 
There is also a commercial marina on north bank of creek. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: None. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced 
in August and completed in October, 1957. Total project costs 
as of September 30, 1995 amounted to $692,882 of which 
$29,000 was for new work and $663,882 for maintenance. 
14. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY 
BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL 
AND MEXICAN BORDER 
(MOBILE DISTRICT) 
Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee 
Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, 
10-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land cuts. (For 
further details see Annual Report for 1962.) 
Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report 
for 1930. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for a 
waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water 
from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 
12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama to 
Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a 
tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet 
wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal 
Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The 
waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee 
Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 
miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. None. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use 
at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, 
Florida; Mobile and Bayou La Batre, Alabama; and 
Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christian, and Bay St. 
Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Dredging navigation channel maintenance cost 
$2,086,218. Condition surveys, water quality studies, 
supervision and administration totaled $1,328,563. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is 
completed except for the portion between Apalachicola Bay 
and St. Marks, Florida, which has been deauthorized. 
Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12-foot 
by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed 
June 1969. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 
1995 is $78,953,676, of which $6,480,299 was for new work 
and $72,473,377 for maintenance. 
15. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS 
Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in 
southeastern Mississippi, about 35 miles west of Pascagoula, 
Mississippi, and 60 miles east of New Orleans. (See Coast 
and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) 
Previous project. For details see page 747. Annual Report 
for 1938, and page 995, Annual Report for 1948. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 
channel 32 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about eight miles 
long across Ship Island Bar, a channel 30 feet deep, 220 feet 
wide, and about 11 miles long through Mississippi Sound, 
and an anchorage basin at Gulfport 30 feet deep, 1,320 feet 
wide, and 2,640 feet long; and (b) maintenance of the existing 
commercial smallboat harbor about 26 acres in area, and a 
straight-approach channel, 100 feet wide and about 4,300 feet 
long, from deep water in Mississippi Sound to a smallboat 
basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Under ordinary conditions mean 
tidal range is about 1.75 feet, and extreme range, except during 
storms, is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. 
The project is authorized in the Water Resources Development 
Act (WRDA) 1986, and further amended by WRDA 1988 to 
modify the existing ship channel to 36 by 300 feet in 
Mississippi Sound, and 38 by 400 feet across the bar, with 
changes in the channel alignment and the turning basin for 
safe and unrestricted navigation. The FY 91 construction 
appropriation provided for constructing an increment of the 
authorized project and provide a 36 by 220 feet channel in 
Mississippi Sound and 38 by 300 feet across the bar. (See 
Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation have 
been fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. Existing modern rail-connected 
terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for 
existing commerce. (See Port Series 19, revised in 1979.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Thin-layer monitoring activities cost $144,808: 
Engineering and design cost $49,620; and supervision and 
administration cost $10,585. A total Federal cost of $205,013. 
Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $1,847,993. 
Condition surveys, supervision and administration and 
miscellaneous costs amounted to $359,290. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The main harbor was 
commenced 1932 and completed April 1950. Maintenance for 
small boat harbor and approach channel, constructed by local 
interests in 1950, was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor 
Act. Awarded thin-layer monitoring contract in June 1991 
under the authority of WRDA 1986 and 1988. The channel 
contract was awarded in April 1992, thin-layer monitoring 
program is continuing. Total Federal cost under existing project 
as of September 30, 1995 is $24,005,610 for new work and 
$49,404,434 for maintenance, a total of $73,410,044. 
Contributed funds for new work amounted to $8,844,049. 
16. MOBILE HARBOR, AL 
Location. The project is located along the lower 5 miles of 
Mobile River, and channel extends thru Mobile Bay and into 
Gulf of Mexico, in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water 
west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles east of Gulfport 
Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 miles by water northeast of mouth 
of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 
11376.) 
10-12

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report 
for 1963. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 
47-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile 
Bar; (b) a 45-foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth 
of Mobile River; (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile River to 
highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25- 
foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek 
to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths 
being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet in Chickasaw 
Creek; (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 
800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a 
turning basin 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet 
long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 27-foot by 150-foot 
channel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a 
turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley 
Complex ocean terminal, and continuing thence a turning basin 
250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, thence a 
22-foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie 
Island to the mainland; (h) a channel serving the Theodore 
Industrial Park 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main 
ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for 
about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an 
anchorage basin near the shoreline, thence a land cut 40 feet 
deep, 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 
acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 
12-by 100-feet, extending 6,500 feet and terminating in a 300- 
by 300-foot turning basin; and (i) maintenance of Three Mile 
Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal 
to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage 
area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long opposite 
site formerly occupied by the U.S. Quarantine Station at 
McDuffie (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay 
Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station 
anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. 
Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across 
Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the 
mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total 
length of the bay and river channel is about 41.7 miles. Plane 
of reference is mean low water. Under ordinary conditions 
mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 
feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 
feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. 
Further authorization provides for future development to 
deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 feet by 
700 feet about 7.4 miles long, deepen and widen bay channel 
to 55 feet by 550 feet about 27.0 miles long, deepen and widen 
an additional 3.6 miles of bay channel to 55 feet by 650 feet 
and provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in 
vicinity of Little Sand Island. All dredged material will be 
placed in an approved disposal area in the Gulf of Mexico. 
(See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was 
signed by the local sponsor to construct the project for the 
first increment of work. 
Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal 
facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Model Study, $42,758; Engineering and Design 
$10,445; Supervision and Administration $9,466. 
Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $15,517,149. 
Condition surveys cost $1,213,678. Water quality studies, 
engineering and design and supervision and administration cost 
$826,810. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I of the project 
modification was completed in June 1990. Current estimated 
Federal cost is $218,548,000, and non-Federal cost is 
$178,452,000. Total Federal cost under existing project as of 
September 30, 1995 is $96,205,279 for new work and 
$196,545,798 for maintenance, a total of $292,751,077. 
Contributed funds expended amounted to $18,452,500 for new 
work. 
17. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL 
Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of 
Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See 
Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11389.) 
Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report 
for 1938. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 
about 3.5 miles long, extending from deep water in St. Andrew 
bay through barrier peninsula, known as Lands End, to the 
Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 32 feet deep in the bay 
through Lands End; and 450 feet wide and 34 feet deep in the 
gulf, protected by east, west jetties, extending 2,075 feet and 
2,896 feet respectively; a channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet 
deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State 
Highway 392 Bridge, with branches to serve terminal facilities; 
and the maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou, an arm of 
St. Andrew Bay, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that 
depth in bay to highway bridge. 
Authorized modifications includes branch channels 38 feet 
deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main 
entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at 
Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 
3.4 and 3.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and 
maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers 
10-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 
38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type 
intermodal carriers, 40 feet deep and containing about 177 
acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance 
channel. Mean tidal range is about normally 1.3 feet and 3.0 
feet extreme. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are 
considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 
No. 19.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $35,696; Engineering 
and design, water quality studies, and miscellaneous costs 
totaled $47,431. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior 
to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs 
to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed 
October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon 
were completed in January 1972. Total Federal cost under 
existing project as of September 30, 1995 is $1,638,045 for 
new work and $9,589,213 for maintenance, a total of 
$11,227,258. Contributed funds expended for new work 
amount to $80,000. 
18. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS 
Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of 
Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in 
Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of 
Pascagoula River), and through Mississippi Sound into the 
Gulf of Mexico, in southeastern Mississippi, about 38 miles 
west of Mobile, Alabama, and about 100 miles east of New 
Orleans, Louisiana. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 
11373.) 
Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report 
for 1938. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for (a) An 
entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf 
of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impounding 
area for littoral drift, 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 
1,500 feet long adjacent to the channel at the west end of Petit 
Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in 
Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge 
at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 
950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the 
river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 
225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to 
the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 feet deep and 300 feet 
wide for about one mile to a turning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 
feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot deep by 150-foot 
wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to 
the mouth of Escatawpa (or Dog) River, then up Escatawpa 
River to Highway 613 (formerly 63) bridge; (e) a 12-foot by 
125-foot channel from the highway bridge; via Robertson and 
Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Escatawpa River; and (f) a 12- 
foot by 80-foot channel extending from deep water in the 
Pascagoula River (about one-half mile north of the railroad 
bridge) to a turning basin in Krebs Lake a distance of about 
1,500 feet, then along the south bank of the lake a channel 10- 
foot by 60-foot and terminating at a second turning basin, a 
distance of 2,700 feet from the first. Under ordinary conditions 
mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3.75 feet. 
Plane of reference is mean low water. 
Further authorization provides for deepening and widening 
gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Horn Island 
channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet 
westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet; 
widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 by 350 feet and 
construct turning basin. Disposal of all new work material in 
Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities 
at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
(See Port Series No. 19.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New Work: Construction Contract cost $4,550,766; 
Engineering and Design cost $139,121; supervision and 
administration cost $121,362. A total Federal cost of 
$4,811,249 for new work. 
Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $2,416,604. 
Condition surveys cost $173,673. Water quality studies, 
supervision and administration, and miscellaneous costs totaled 
$180,824. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was 
completed in August 1965 and the Krebs Lake project was 
completed in November 1983. The General Design 
Memorandum (GDM) was approved in June 1992 for 
deepening and widening channels. Preconstruction Engineering 
and Design is complete. The channel dredging contract was 
awarded in September 1994. Total Federal cost of existing 
project to September 30, 1995 is $11,636,714 for new work 
and $58,679,798 for maintenance, a total of $70,316,512. 
Contributed funds expended for maintenance amounted to 
$4,257,750. 
19. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL 
Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the 
coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance 
to Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 
and 11382.) 
10-14

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 
35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, 
from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) a 33- 
foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33-foot by 300-foot 
parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner harbor 
channel; (d) an inner harbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet 
deep, and 3,950 feet long; (e) a 30-foot by 250-foot approach 
channel to the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf; and 
(f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, 
thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4,400 
feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. 
Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet 
near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme 
tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane 
of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou 
Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel 
to 21 by 100 feet, the bayou channel to 20 feet by 100 feet, 
and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred 
for restudy. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal 
facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Condition surveys, dredging studies and 
miscellaneous costs totaled $60,396. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed 
except for features which are deferred for restudy. The 
modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in march 
and completed in May 1965. Total Federal cost of the existing 
project to September 30, 1995 is $1,469,693 for new work 
and $8,374,758 for maintenance, a total of $9,844,451. 
Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $297,587. 
20. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL 
Location. The project is located about midway between 
Pensacola, Florida, and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and 
Geodetic Chart 11378.) 
Existing project. The existing project provides for a 
channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet 
from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence 9 feet deep 
and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, 
where the channel branches into two arms, each having 
dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 
3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into 
the southern arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides 
for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The 
east jetty has a low weir section, 1000 feet long to permit 
passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 
feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the 
navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet and extreme 
is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation 
have been fully complied with to date. 
Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber piers, 
docks, and several launching ramps are available. These 
facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Maintenance dredging, $855,271 and 
condition surveys and miscellaneous costs totaled $71,592. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was 
commenced in May 1968 and completed in May 1969. Total 
Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1995 is 
$629,860 for new work and $8,765,741 for maintenance, a 
total of $9,395,601. Contributions from local interest amount 
to $510,000 for new work and $10,325 for maintenance. 
21. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE 
WATERWAY, AL AND MS 
Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in 
Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through 
northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 234 
miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee 
Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. 
Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1953. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for a 
waterway 234 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and 
Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and 
Mackeys and Yellow Creeks and consists of three sections as 
follows: (1) the river section, a 9-foot by 300-foot channel 
for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; 
(2) the canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 46 miles from 
Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot 
by 300-foot channel (except in the 27 mile long divide cut in 
which the bottom width is 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay 
Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River. 
The total life of 341 feet is accomplished by 10 locks (See 
Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests have made and are 
maintaining alterations in highways and highway bridges and 
in sewer, water-supply, and drainage facilities and provide 
and maintain suitable and adequate river and canal terminals. 
Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these 
requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials of the State 
10-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation 
enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties 
concerned to enter into agreements with the United States 
relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of 
Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of 
Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky and Florida has 
been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The 
name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee 
Waterway Development Authority. 
During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature 
authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water 
Management District. The District was organized in 
accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered 
to fulfill the requirements of local cooperation for the portion 
of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has 
been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama 
Legislature authorized the formation of a public corporation 
to be named the Tombigbee Valley Development Authority 
for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee 
River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in 
accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum 
held December 5, 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a 
bond issue not to exceed $10,000,000 of finance participation 
in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries 
project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. 
Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities and handling 
equipment are still being developed along this new waterway. 
As of September 30,1995, twelve such facilities were 
operational, while five were under construction, and five more 
are planned. The operational facilities are handling grain, 
wood chips, and logs. When all facilities are complete, about 
half will be publicly owned and operated. Additional ports 
and terminals must be completed before the waterway can 
achieve its full potential. (See Table 10-N for existing locks 
and dams.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Grounds and utilities cost $163,134; relocations 
cost $1,302; recreation facilities $2,438,952; real estate 
$4,626; engineering and design cost $144,203 and supervision 
and administration cost $416,606, a total of $3,168,823 for 
new work. 
Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system cost 
$2,807,847. Total cost for operation and maintenance of the 
project for FY 95 amounted to $20,920,787, which included 
general charges of $6,321,745; Gainesville Lock and Dam, 
$467,433; Tom Bevill Lock and Dam, $521,824; Columbus 
Lock and Dam, $513,723; Aberdeen Lock and Dam, 
$625,562; Lock A, $396,586; Lock B, $440,347; Lock C, 
$402,425; Lock D, $726,708; Lock E, $227,546; Bay Springs 
Lock and Dam, $322,042. Recreation costs totaled 
$7,146,999. Recreation attendance for FY 1995 totaled 
2,605,000 visits. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under 
the existing project as of September 30, 1995 is 
$1,050,940,326 for new work, and $222,773,165 for 
maintenance for a total of $1,273,713,491. Construction 
formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is 
essentially complete. There is currently one (1) recreational 
contract underway on the project. The waterway was opened 
for navigation in January 1985. 
21A. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE 
WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION 
PROJECT, AL AND MS 
Location. This project is in Alabama and Mississippi at 
the following locations: 
(1) Existing Project Lands - Approximately 72,500 acres 
of Tennessee-Tombigbee Project Lands have been designated 
for mitigation purposes. An additional 20,100 acres have also 
been designated at Coffeeville Lake, Demopolis Lake, 
Claiborne Lake and Dannelly Lakes in Alabama and at 
Okatibbee Lake in Mississippi. 
(2) Separable Lands - Acquisition and management of 
88,000 separable lands in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta, Alabama 
(not less than 20,000 acres); the Pascagoula, Pearl, and 
Mississippi Delta Basins in Mississippi (not less than 25,000 
acres); and the balance at any location in the two states. 
Previous project. None. This project was a new 
construction start in Fiscal year 1990. It was authorized by 
Section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 
Existing project. The authorized project calls for the 
acquisition of separable lands at the above named locations. 
The Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural 
Resources, Mississippi Department of Wildlife Fisheries and 
Parks, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) will 
assist in the selection of separable lands. The selected lands 
will be purchased from willing sellers at fair market value. 
Emphasis will be placed on forested wetlands, with a 
minimum of 34,000 acres of bottomland hardwoods being 
purchased. 
The separable lands and the existing project lands 
designated for mitigation purposes will be managed for 
wildlife. The States will be primarily responsible for managing 
these lands in accordance with a management plan jointly 
developed by the States, Corps and the FWS. However, due 
to operational constraints it will be necessary for the Corps 
10-16

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
to retain management responsibility for some of the existing 
project lands included in the mitigation program. 
Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not 
required since the cost of this project is a 100% Federal 
responsibility. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. Land 
acquisition cost $10,269,849. Wildlife facilities $1,456,986; 
Equipment and miscellaneous $2,864,211; Engineering and 
Design $496,846. Supervision and administration, $510,624. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial funding for the 
project was received in January 1990. At the end of September 
1995, 20,209 acres had been acquired in the Mobile-Tensaw 
Delta; 13,433 acres in the Pascagoula Basin; 18,542 acres in 
the Mississippi Delta; 5,966 acres in the Pearl Basin; 14,298 
acres in northeast Mississippi; and 8,517 acres in other areas 
of Alabama. Evaluation of tracts offered for consideration 
are nearing completion. A variety of activities also continued 
to intensively manage the 92,600 acres of existing project 
lands included in the Mitigation Program. Scheduled 
completion date is September 1997. The total project cost is 
estimated to be $87,300,000. Total Federal cost of the project 
to September 30, 1995 is $68,647,814. 
22. OTHER AUTHORIZED 
NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(See Table 10-C.) 
23. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH 
EROSION CONTROL PROJECT 
(See Table 10-D.) 
24. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Table 10-E.) 
25. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 
86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Studies conducted 
under this authority amounted to $52,700 in FY 1994. (See 
Table 10-H.) 
26. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
(See Table 10-J.) 
27. RECONNAISSANCE AND 
CONDITION SURVEYS 
(See Table 10-K.) 
FLOOD CONTROL 
BAYVIEW COURT, 
BAY ST. LOUIS, MS 
Location. Bayview Court is located in the City of Bay St. 
Louis, Mississippi. The project is on Mississippi Sound about 
95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 50 
miles from New Orleans, Louisiana, on the west. 
Existing project. This beach erosion project provides for 
construction of a 700 linear-foot concrete block revetment. 
The scarped project will be filled with clean sand, sloped, 
compacted, and covered with geotextile fabric. Interlocking 
concrete blocks, connected with cable to form a block mat 
system, will then be placed over the prepared surface. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Feasibility studies cost $70,898; and $14,806 
for Supervision and administration. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated 
in November 1995, and is scheduled to be completed in May 
1996. Total Federal cost to date is $85,704, and no contributed 
funds expended to date. 
29. CHOCTAWHATCHEE/PEA RIVERS, 
ELBA AND GENEVA, AL 
Location. The Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins are 
located in southeast, Alabama. The damage center of Elba is 
located approximately 68 miles southwest from the head water 
of the Pea River. The damage center of Geneva is located 
approximately 48 miles south from the head water of the 
Choctawhatchee River. 
Existing project. The project consists of the installation 
of 14 combination rain and stream gages within the 
Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins. The base stations are 
located at Elba and Geneva, Alabama. The flood warning 
system provides early warning time ranging between 18 to 
36 hours. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Reconnaissance studies cost $370; Planning 
cost was $198,000 with engineering and design cost being 
10-17
28.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
$100,000; Engineering and Design cost $23,314; and 
Supervision and administration cost $4,296.. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated 
in September 1995. Total Federal cost to date is $27,980 for 
new work. No contributed funds expended to date. 
30. COUNTY ROAD 55, 
ETOWAH CO., AL 
Location. The project is located in northern Alabama, 
approximately 65 miles northeast of Birmingham, Alabama. 
Existing project. The project consists of excavation of 
1,800 cubic yards of loose roadway embankment, cutting the 
bank back to a stable slope, backfill with 1,600 cubic yards 
of compacted material, placement of riprap along 
approximately 130 linear feet of the bank, and installation of 
a French drain to facilitate drainage down the slope and 
through the project; and provision of a guardrail to maintain 
the engineering integrity of the Federal project. 
Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Construction contract award activities cost $521; and 
supervision and administration cost $8,442. 
Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction was 
initiated in June 1994, and completed in August 1994. Total 
Federal cost to date is $241,743 for new work. Contributed 
funds expended for new work amounted to $40,000. 
31. DAUPHIN ISLAND 
SHORELINE, AL 
Location. The project protects the public fishing pier in 
the Main Beach Park, about 3 miles from the east end of 
Dauphin Island, Alabama, a barrier island on the west side of 
the mouth of Mobile Bay about 30 miles south of Mobile, 
Alabama. 
Existing project. The project provides about 400 feet of 
stone protection along the shoreline at the end of the pier and 
a 30-foot wide by 3-foot thick stone blanket beneath the pier 
for its full length, about 800 feet, all placed on geotech filter 
fabric. Protection for the balance of the park was found to be 
uneconomical. 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with 
the Dauphin Island Park and Beach Board was signed on 
October 4, 1993. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Supervision and administration cost $2,500. 
Conditions at end of fiscal year. Invitations for bids 
was issued on September 28, 1993. Construction was 
completed in March 1994. Total Federal cost to date is 
$352,479 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new 
work amounted to $102,000. 
32. EAST END 
DAUPHIN ISLAND, AL 
Location. The project is on the extreme east end of Dauphin 
Island, Alabama, a barrier island on the west side of the mouth 
of Mobile Bay about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama. 
The project provides erosion protection for historic Fort 
Gaines, one of the forts which guarded the mouth of Mobile 
Bay. 
Existing project. The Corps of Engineers began erosion 
control works around Fort Gaines late in the 1800's and the 
existing works were completed around 1909. The project 
restores the existing shore protection in the immediate vicinity 
of Fort Gaines to the original 1909 configuration utilizing 
modern geotech filter fabric and stone in the same size range 
as the existing structure. 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with 
the Dauphin Island Park and Beach Board was signed on 
September 3, 1993. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. 
New work: No expenditures for FY 1995. 
Conditions at end of fiscal year. Invitation for bids was 
issued on September 28, 1993. Construction was completed 
in March 1994. Total Federal cost to date is $318,580 for 
new work. Contributed funds expended for new work 
amounted to $81,200. 
33. ESLAVA CREEK, 
MOBILE, AL 
Location. The city of Mobile, Alabama, which is located 
on the Gulf Coast of Alabama. The project begins at Pine 
Hill Drive and ends 2.1 miles upstream at Emogene Street. 
Existing project. None. The plan of improvement consists 
of channel enlargement, bank stabilization measures, and 
increasing the size of the box culvert at Airport Boulevard 
by adding an additional barrel. (See Table 10-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with 
the city of Mobile was signed on September 14, 1987. The 
local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments 
concurrently with project construction. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Construction contract $1,031,745; engineering 
and design $37,854; and supervision and administration 
$26,029. 
10-18

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was 
completed in December 1994. Total Federal cost under 
existing project to September 30, 1995 is $4,669,411. 
Contributed funds expended $334,004. 
34. GADSDEN-WATER TREATMENT 
PLANT, GADSDEN, AL 
Location. The project is located in Gadsden, Alabama. 
Existing project. The project provides riprapped slope 
protection for 80 feet upstream, and 80 feet downstream of 
an intake structure. Downstream the project transitions into 
a trapezoidal riprapped section which constitutes the 
riverward side of the project. The riprap slope protection 
extends downstream for an additional 180 feet where it 
terminates just upstream of an existing 20-inch discharge pipe. 
The riverbank section is at 1 vertical on 2 horizontal side 
slope with a flow depth of 47 feet. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Construction contract award activities cost $21,657; and 
Supervision and administration cost $13,904. 
Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
project was started in July 1994, and completed in October 
1994. Total Federal cost to date is $370,359 for new work. 
Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to 
$95,034. 
35. HANCOCK COUNTY SEAWALL, 
HANCOCK COUNTY, MS 
Location. Hancock County is located on Mississippi Sound 
about 95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 
50 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana, on the west 
Existing project. The shoreline protection project for 
Hancock County consists of a 990-foot timber bulkhead, two 
feet in front of an existing concrete seawall. The project 
consists of 12-inch diameter timber face piling 5-foot on 
center. Attached to the piling is 4 x 8-inch timber walls which 
support 3 x 8-inch treated timber sheeting. The sheeting is 
backed by filter fabric, and earth fill is placed between the 
bulkhead and the seawall and sodded. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New Work: Construction contract cost $179,184; Plans and 
Specifications cost $707; and Supervision and administration 
costs amounted to $41,128. 
Conditions at end of fiscal year. A construction contract 
was awarded April 1995, and was completed in August 1995. 
Total Federal cost to date is $221,019 for new work. 
Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to 
$85,083. 
36. NORTH BEACH BOULEVARD, 
BAY ST. LOUIS, MS 
Location. The project is located in the city of Bay St. 
Louis, Mississippi. It is on St. Louis Bay about 95 miles from 
Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 50 miles from New 
Orleans, Louisiana, on the west. 
Existing project. The beach erosion project provides for 
construction of a 700 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall 
constructed in front of an existing concrete seawall. Concrete 
will be placed between the new sheetpile walls and the bottom 
step of the existing concrete seawall. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Feasibility studies cost $63,451; and 
Supervision and Administration cost $12,641. 
Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction was 
initiated in November 1995, and is scheduled to be completed 
in May 1996. Total Federal cost to date is $76,092 and no 
contributed funds expended to date. 
37. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS 
Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 
miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, 
seven miles northwest of Meridian. 
Existing project. The project provides for a dam and 
reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, 
fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists of a 
compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 
369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 
18 feet. The spillway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the 
east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type, 1,500 
feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake 
structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter 
concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water 
quality control varies seasonally from 21,400 acre-feet to 
34,300 acre-feet between a minimum elevation of 328 and 
10-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
top-of-conservation-pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. 
Storage varying from 46,500 to 59,500 acre-feet between the 
top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been 
reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 
10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Complied with to date. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Costs for the year for ordinary maintenance 
and recreational management amount to $1,569,897. 
Recreation attendance at the reservoir during FY 1995 totaled 
972,000 visits. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total 
Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1995 
is $9,739,528 for new work and $20,083,557 for maintenance, 
a total of $29,823,085. 
38. PORTERSVILLE BAY - EAST, 
MOBILE COUNTY, AL 
Location. The project is located in the town of Coden, in 
south Mobile County, Alabama. Portersville Bay, an arm of 
Mississippi Sound, is about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar 
Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of 
Mobile Bay. 
Existing project. The project provides shoreline bank 
protection along 5,600 feet of Shell Belt Road. The protective 
works consists of a timber bulkhead constructed of 12-inch 
diameter and 12-foot long vertical piles. Treated timber 
sheeting penetrates 3 feet below the dredged line to prevent 
scour at the toe. The sheeting is backed by non-woven filter 
fabric and backfilled. 
Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement 
with Mobile County, Alabama was signed on March 24, 1992. 
The non-Federal sponsor has made all required cash 
payments, and all other items of local cooperation have been 
fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work: No expenditures for FY 1995. 
Conditions at end of fiscal year. The construction contract 
was awarded on August 11, 1992, and construction of the 
shoreline protection project was commenced in September 
1992. All work on the project was completed in May 1993. 
A total Federal cost of $516,157. Contributed funds expended 
for new work amounted to $327,900. 
39. PORTERSVILLE BAY - WEST 
MOBILE COUNTY, AL 
Location. The project is located in the town of Coden, in 
south Mobile County, Alabama. Portersville Bay, an arm of 
Mississippi Sound, is about 7.0 miles northwest of Cedar 
Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of 
Mobile Bay. 
Existing project. The project provides shoreline bank 
protection along 3,500 feet of Coden Belt Road. The 
protective works consist of a timber bulkhead constructed of 
12-inch diameter and 12-foot long vertical piles. Treated 
timber sheeting penetrates 3 feet below the dredged line to 
prevent scour at the toe. The sheeting is backed by non-woven 
filter fabric and backfilled. 
Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement 
with Mobile County, Alabama was signed on March 24, 1992. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work: No expenditures for FY 1995. 
Conditions at end of fiscal year. The construction contract 
was awarded on August 11, 1992, and construction of the 
shoreline protection project was commenced in September 
1992. All work on the project was completed in May 1993. 
A total Federal cost of $426,966. Contributed funds expended 
for new work amounted to $162,700. 
40. SOWASHEE CREEK, 
MERIDIAN, MS 
Location. The project is located in East Central 
Mississippi, Lauderdale County, in the city of Meridian, which 
is approximately 90 miles east of Jackson, Mississippi. 
Existing project. In 1955, the Corps of Engineers 
completed channel improvement on the lower 10.5 miles of 
Sowashee Creek. This work was accomplished under the 
authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as 
amended. The plan of improvement consists of a combination 
of channel enlargement (3.9 miles), and clearing and snagging 
(6.6 miles) over a reach of 10.5 miles. One (1) railroad bridge 
and several highway roads and bridges and utilities will 
require modification for the channel improvement. (See Table 
10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with 
the Pat Harrison Waterway District was completed on 
September 23, 1987. The local sponsor has also agreed to 
make all required payments concurrently with project 
construction. 
10-20

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
Operation and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Engineering and design $245,569; and 
supervision and administration $21,169. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. All contracts have been 
completed except for the recreation contract. Plans and 
specifications for the expanded recreation were initiated in 
FY 1993. Construction contract award is unscheduled. An 
Operation and Maintenance Manual was provided to the city. 
Current estimated Federal cost is $19,718,000; and the non- 
Federal portion is $12,782,000. Total Federal cost under 
existing project to September 30, 1995 is $15,766,315 for 
new work. Contributed funds expended $1,146,493. 
41. TALLAHALLA CREEK, 
LAUREL, MS 
Location. The project is located in the city of Laurel, 
Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin in southeastern 
Mississippi. 
Existing project. None. The project along Tallahalla Creek 
consists of channel clearing and snagging with overbank 
clearing of brush and trees less than 4 inches diameter for a 
distance of 30 feet on each bank. The project begins about 
1.5 miles below Queensburg Avenue Bridge and extends 
upstream 7.25 miles to U.S. Highway 84. Also, a flood 
warning system was installed in the Tallahalla Creek Basin 
to relay data to a base station. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Engineering and design cost $60,998. 
Supervision and administration costs amounted to $13,501. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The advertisement for 
bids for clearing and snagging portion of the project was 
cancelled in August, 1989 due to erosion at two sites along 
Masonites Lagoon Dikes. A flood warning system for the 
Tallahala Creek basin was awarded in January 1990 and 
completed in May 1990. The construction contract was 
awarded in September 1992 and completed in September 
1993. Total Federal cost to date is $624,091 for new work. 
Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to 
$40,000. 
42. THREEMILE CREEK, 
MOBILE, AL 
Location. The project is located near the Gulf of Mexico in 
the southwest corner of the state of Alabama and in the city of 
Mobile, approximately 180 miles southwest of Montgomery, 
Alabama. Threemile Creek originates in the western part of 
Mobile and flows easterly about 14 miles to enter Mobile River 
near the Alabama State Docks. The drainage area of the basin 
consists of 39 square miles of urbanized area. 
Existing project. None. The authorized flood control 
project will consist of channel widening and deepening from 
about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 
6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 
miles. The plan also includes development of certain 
recreational facilities of the type associated with urban parks. 
(See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with 
the city of Mobile, Alabama was completed on September 
30, 1987. The local sponsor has agreed to make all payments 
concurrently with project construction. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Real Estate acquisitions, $4,000; reimbursement 
to sponsor, $-325,728. Construction contracts $-105,254; 
engineering and design cost $5,538; and supervision and 
administration cost $1,484. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete 
and has been turned over to the local sponsor. Total Federal 
cost under existing project to September 30, 1995 is 
$16,928,278 for new work. Contributed funds expended 
$1,154,516. 
43. TOMBIGBEE RIVER BRIDGE #6, 
MONROE COUNTY, MS 
Location. The project is located in about 2.4 miles northwest 
of Amory in Monroe County, Mississippi, 0.2 miles upstream 
from St. Louis-San Francisco Railway bridge. 
Existing Project. The project will consist of a rock training 
dike, riprap revetment blankets, and an overbank drainage 
structure. The rock training dike will begin at State Highway 
6 bridge and extends 300 feet upstream. From that point, the 
bank will be graded and riprapped to a 1 vertical on 3 
horizontal slope for a distance of 220 feet. Included also is an 
overbank drainage structure to accommodate runoff from the 
highway. Riprap protection is afforded a pier for a distance of 
40 feet upstream and 40 downstream of the centerline of the 
bridge. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 
Construction contract cost $199,032; Engineering and design 
cost $6,569. Supervision and administration cost $27,217. 
Conditions at end of fiscal year. The estimated costs of 
the project is $440,000 of which $330,000 would be Federal 
10-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
and $110,000 would be non-Federal. Construction of the 
project was started in September 1994, and completed in 
March 1995. Total Federal cost to date is $309,203 for new 
work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $109,219. 
44. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), 
MS AND AL 
Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River 
and its tributaries between the junction of the Browns and 
Mackeys Creek in Itawamba County, Mississippi, for a 
distance of 53 miles along the East Fork of the Tombigbee 
River, from Walkers Bridge at the junction of Browns and 
Mackeys Creeks to the Monroe County line. 
Existing project. Provides for alleviation of floods from 
the Tombigbee River by clearing and snagging and excavation 
of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel 
improvements. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with on work done 
under the 1963 Flood Control Act. Work to be done under 
authority of the 1941 Flood Control Act requires local interest 
to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project 
construction; hold and save the United States free from 
damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and 
operate all the works after completion in accordance with 
regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance of channels cost 
$116,275. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project for Itawamba 
County, as authorized in the 1936 Flood Control Act, was 
completed during fiscal year 1940. No work has been done 
on the extension of the project authorized in the 1941 Flood 
Control Act. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of 
September 30, 1995 is $134,801 for new work and $3,429,148 
for maintenance, a total of $3,563,949. 
45. TOMBIGBEE RIVER 
TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL 
Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast 
Mississippi and flows southerly through eastern Mississippi 
and western Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 
45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to 
be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi 
and northwest Alabama. Luxapalila Creek project consists 
of 2.1 miles of completed channel modifications. The 
remaining effort consists of approximately 26 miles of various 
channel work. Approved estimate of cost for new work is 
$42,108,000; consisting of $37,743,000 Federal funds, and 
$4,365,000 non-Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and 
rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway 
bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and 
relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States 
free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the 
improved channels; maintain all works after completion, with 
the exception of Twenty Mile Creek from mile 11.7 to mile 
22.0. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Real estate cost $10,819; Contract cost 
$3,690,600; engineering and design $152,848, and 
supervision and administration cost $427,580. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced 
in July 1965, and is proceeding stream by stream as funds are 
made available. Total project is 90% complete. Luxapalila 
Creek is the only remaining work scheduled to be 
accomplished. The main construction contract was awarded 
in June 1994, and is 70% complete. All work is scheduled to 
be completed by September 1996. Total Federal cost of 
existing project as of September 30, 1995 is $30,395,003 for 
new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to 
$143,467. 
46. UPPER GORDON CREEK, 
HATTIESBURG, MS 
Location. The proposed project on Gordons Creek is 
located in Hattiesburg, MS. 
Existing project. A Federal project on the lower 2.5 miles 
was constructed in 1979 under the Section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948. The project consisted of clearing and 
snagging from the creek's confluence with the Leaf River 
upstream to Bay Street and channel widening to a 40-foot 
bottom width between Bay and Broad Streets. 
The work will consist of real estate acquisition of eight (8) 
residences and removal from floodplain; habitat mitigation 
and channel enlargement for 1.1 miles between Broad and 
Hardy Streets; and flood damages mitigation downstream of 
Broad Street. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New Work: Real Estate cost $441,816; Construction 
contract $1,217,509; Engineering and design cost $36,510. 
Supervision and administration costs amounted to $121,314. 
10-22

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract 
was awarded in April 1994, and construction was completed 
in April 1995. Necessary right-of-ways for channel 
improvement are available and necessary relocations 
performed by non-federal sponsors. Also, acquisition of 
twenty-one (21) residences for mitigation is underway. 
Estimated Federal cost is $3,238,000; and the non-Federal 
portion is $1,289,000. Total Federal cost to date is $3,556,910 
for new work. Contributed funds expended $130,639. 
47. VILLAGE CREEK, 
BIRMINGHAM, AL 
Location. The project is located in central Alabama, 
Jefferson County, in the city of Birmingham, Alabama. 
Existing project. None. The project is basically nonstructural 
and includes evacuating 642 structures, in six (6) 
separate neighborhoods, from the floodplain; enlarging 2 
miles of the stream channel in the vicinity of the Municipal 
Airport which also involves modification of three (3) bridges, 
demolishing two (2) unused bridges, and relocating two (2) 
waterlines and other utilities, installing three (3) emergency 
floodwarning devices; and creating an area of 210 acres which 
can be utilized for future recreation development. Channel 
enlargements (2 miles) will reduce annual damages near 
Municipal Airport by 82 percent and evacuation of 642 
structures will reduce annual damages in residential areas by 
61 percent. 
Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement 
with the city of Birmingham, Alabama was executed on 
December 14, 1988. The local sponsor has also agreed to 
make all required payments concurrently with the project 
construction. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Real Estate cost $293,758; engineering and 
design, $55,061; and supervision and administration $74,792. 
Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to 
$192,008. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate design 
memorandum completed February 1988. Real Estate 
acquisition started January 1989. The project is 99% 
complete. Acquisition of 633 tracts out of a total of 634 tracts 
have been completed through September 30, 1995. Project 
scheduled to be completed September 1996. Current estimated 
Federal cost is $26,912,000; and the non-Federal portion is 
$10,388,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to 
September 30, 1995 is $22,092,529 for new work. Contributed 
funds for new work amounted to $7,200,091. 
48. WAVELAND SEAWALL, 
WAVELAND, MS 
Location. The city of Waveland is in the southern portion 
of Hancock County, Mississippi. It is located on Mississippi 
Sound about 95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east 
and about 50 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana, on the west. 
Existing project. The shoreline protection project for 
Waveland, Mississippi, consists of a 1,008 linear-foot 
concrete/sheetpile wall segment, and a 500 linear-foot 
concrete/sheetpile wall segment constructed in front of an 
existing concrete seawall. Concrete was placed between the 
new sheetpile walls and the bottom step of the existing 
concrete seawalls. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work: Construction contract cost $273,526; Feasibility 
cost $483; Plans and Specifications cost $4,033; and 
Supervision and administration cost $64,933. 
Conditions at end of fiscal year. A construction contract 
was awarded in April 1995, and completed in June 1995. 
Total Federal costs to date are $342,975, and contributed funds 
expended for new work amounted to $133,000. 
FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public 
Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). 
Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 
208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 
Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant 
to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 
(See Table 10-J) 
Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, 
and rescue work under Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and 
antecedent legislation, and disaster relief and assistance under 
Public law 288, 93d Congress. (See Table 10-J) 
50. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Local flood protection works for which inspection is 
performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West 
Point, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River; Beaver Creek at 
Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and 
Geneva, Alabama in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, 
Georgia, and Little Wills Creek at Collinsville, Alabama, in 
the Alabama-Coosa River Basin. Channel rectification 
10-23 
49.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
projects include Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama and 
Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama in the Alabama-Coosa River 
Basin; Big Brown Creek, Donivan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek 
and Mantachie Creek, near Fulton, Mississippi, Burketts 
Creek and Stanifer Creek near Amory, Mississippi, Houlka 
Creek and Sakatonchee Creek in Chickasaw and Clay 
Counties, Mississippi, James Creek in Monroe County, 
Mississippi, and Luxapalila Creek, Lowndes County, 
Mississippi, all in the Tombigbee River Basin; Sowashee 
Creek, Meridian, Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin; 
Burnt Corn and Murder Creeks, Brewton, Alabama in the 
Conecuh River Basin; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; 
Poley Bridge, Goose Pone and Walnut Creeks, Clanton, 
Alabama; Pinchgut Creek, and Cahaba River, Trussville, 
Alabama; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas 
in Bainbridge, Georgia. Shore protection and erosion control 
projects include Harrison County, Mississippi; Leaf River, 
Mahned, Mississippi; Chattahoochee River at La Grange, 
Troup County, Georgia; Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, 
Georgia; and Chickasawbogue Creek, US Highway 43 Bridge, 
Linden, Alabama. The project at Rome and Montezuma, 
Georgia and Collinsville, Alabama include pumping stations. 
Inspections were made during FY 91 to determine the extent 
of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and 
operation of the project. Responsible local officials were 
advised of inadequacies in the maintenance and operation of 
the local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where 
appropriate. Followup for compliance of the deficient projects 
continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $20,819. 
Total cost to September 30, 1995 is $726,477 charged to 
maintenance. 
51. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Table 10-E.) Multiple-Purpose Projects Including 
Power 
Multiple Purpose Power Projects 
52. ALLATOONA DAM, COOSA 
RIVER BASIN, GA 
Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, 
Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about 
five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 
feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir 
extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum 
power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of streamflow 
for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height 
above the river bottom of the concrete, gravity-type dam is 
about 190 feet, from elevation 690 feet to 880 feet national 
geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is 
controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twenty-six 
feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twenty-six 
feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 
cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3. 
One 48-inch diameter sluicing conduit with a free discharge 
valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, 
are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of 
two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a 
total of 74,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres 
at elevation 860, has a storage capacity of 670,000 acre-feet. 
The initial construction cost was $31,424,738, excluding the 
addition of recreation facilities at the completed project. (See 
Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. (Sec. 2, Flood Control 
Act of June 28, 1938, applies). 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, 
reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and 
administration totaled $5,895,074. Gross power generation 
amounted to 127,840,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1995 of 
which 125,383,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to 
Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at 
Allatoona Lake during FY 1995 totaled 4,623,000 visits. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in 
October 1955. Total Federal cost under existing project as of 
September 30, 1995 is $35,709,085 for new work and 
$107,746,361 for maintenance, a total of $143,455,446. 
53. BUFORD DAM, 
LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA 
Location. Buford Dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 
348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five 
miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir, Lake Sidney 
Lanier, extends about 47 miles upstream along the 
Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the Chestatee 
River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above 
the dam. 
Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 
rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest elevation 1,106 
feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed 
elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 
feet; a chute spillway with crest at elevation 1,085; a 
10-24

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
powerhouse in a deep cut with steel penstocks in tunnels, and 
concrete intake structure at the upstream end of the tunnels; 
and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power tunnels. 
The Lake Sidney Lanier reservoir has a gross capacity of 
2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is 
reserved for flood control storage. The power installations 
consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units 
of 40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. (See 
Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $8,545,555. 
Gross power generation amounted to 202,359,000 kilowatt 
hours during FY 1995, of which 199,328,000 kilowatt hours 
were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. 
Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during FY 1995 
totaled 6,865,000 visits. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced 
in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir 
was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. 
The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 
19, 1957; the second on July 26, 1957; and the third on October 
10, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of 
September 30, 1995 is $53,030,038 for new work and 
$133,684,532 for maintenance, a total of $186,714,570. (See 
also Table 10-M.) 
54. CARTERS DAM AND 
RESERVOIR, GA 
Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on 
the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with 
Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the 
Alabama-Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near 
the town of Oakman, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray 
and Gilmer Counties. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 1,950- 
foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on 
the left bank, a 258-foot long high-level, gated spillway on the 
left bank, a powerhouse on the right bank having two 
conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 
kilowatts each and two pump-generating units of the same 
size, and a regulating dam 2,855 feet long with a gated spillway 
208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The 
lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum pool power 
elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 
134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acre-feet 
reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage. 
For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa 
project. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, 
reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities and 
administration totaled $4,614,226. Gross power generation 
amounted to 395,507,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1995, of 
which 93,051,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power 
Administration. Recreation attendance during FY 1995 
totaled 571,000 visits. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which 
commenced in April 1962 and completed in September 1980. 
Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 
1995 is $175,844,542, including $111,140,340 for new work 
and $64,704,202 for maintenance. 
55. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, 
GA AND FL 
Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola River 
107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence 
of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest 
of Chattahoochee, Florida. Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles 
upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of 
Columbia, Alabama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint 
River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological 
Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) 
Existing project. The existing project provides for a 
concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 feet long on the right bank, 
with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a 
single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 
constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet 
feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 
feet; a gated spillway 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 
107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the 
streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section 
constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet 
long to accommodate the switchyard and substation; and an 
overflow dike section 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a 
crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. 
At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total 
capacity of 406,160 acre-feet. The power installation consists 
of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 
kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. 
Easements for rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas were 
provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate 
public terminals were constructed by local interests at 
Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, and at Columbia, 
Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being 
planned for other localities on the project. 
10-25

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck for 
handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, 
a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, 
Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $5,627,012. 
Gross power generation, Jim Woodruff Powerhouse, amounted 
to 211,873,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1995, of which 
209,491,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern 
Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake 
Seminole during FY 1995 totaled 2,631,000 visits. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock 
was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957. The pool 
was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was 
raised to project level in January 1957. The first powergenerating 
unit was placed on-the-line on February 1, the 
second on March 1, and the third April 26, 1957. Total Federal 
cost under existing project as of September 30, 1995 is 
$47,978,858 for new work and $92,929,229 for maintenance, 
a total of $140,908,087. (See also Table 10-M.) 
56. MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND 
DAM, AL 
Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on 
the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, 
and 30 miles southwest of Selma. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth 
dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravity-gated spillway in 
the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth 
dike extending downstream paralleling the lock, to the 
powerhouse intake structure; a powerhouse, and an earth dike 
extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool 
is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains three 25,000 
kilowatt units. The 103-mile long reservoir has an area of 
17,200 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 
331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 
13-foot depth over the miter sills. For other information see 
description of Alabama-Coosa project. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, 
powerhouse, reservoir, and administration cost $3,101,776. 
Gross power generation amounted to 301,836,000 kilowatt 
hours during FY 1995, of which 298,199,000 kilowatt hours 
were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. 
Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir 
during FY 1995 totaled 1,470,000 visits. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operations in 
June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The 
powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 
1970. The project was completed in 1980. Total Federal cost 
of the project as of September 30, 1995 is $63,125,300 for 
new work and $59,959,924 for maintenance, a total of 
$123,085,224. 
57. ROBERT F. HENRY LOCK AND 
DAM, AL 
Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at 
mile 281.2 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of 
Montgomery. 
Existing project. The existing project provides for a 
navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located 
at mile 281.2. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 
and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry Lock 
and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth 
dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in 
the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, and an 
earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway 
of Alabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 
feet with maximum height above the foundation at the power 
plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four 
17,000-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 
12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 
234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 
600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower 
miter sill. For other information see description of Alabama- 
Coosa project. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs amounted 
to $4,663,796. Gross power generation amounted to 
227,175,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1995, of which 
223,340,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern 
Power Administration. Recreation attendance during FY 1995 
totaled 1,584,000 visits. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
March 1966 and is complete. The first powerhouse unit was 
placed in operation in June 1975, with the last unit on line in 
November 1975. Total Federal cost of the project as of 
September 30, 1995 is $127,557,803, including $83,360,800 
for new work and $44,197,003 for maintenance. 
10-26

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
58. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND 
DAM, AL AND GA 
Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 
75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort 
Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest 
Georgia.) 
Existing project. The existing project provides for a 
concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth 
embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the 
dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated 
spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 
feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, of 
almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a 
crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 
feet. The nonoverflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet 
long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 
208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 
450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal upper pool 
elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 18 
feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying 
foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 
acre-feet, with 244,000 acre-feet reserved for power. The power 
installation consists of four units of 32,500 kilowatts each, or 
a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project provides for 
maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B 
for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and 
operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated 
or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide 
suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States 
free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations 
have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. 
Terminal facilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix 
City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered 
adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost for FY 1995 
was $6,939,755. Gross power generation amounted to 
461,967,000 kilowatt hours, of which 455,213,000 kilowatt 
hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. 
Recreational attendance during FY 1995 totaled 4,496,000 
visits. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was 
completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in 
June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed onthe-
line in March, the second in May, the third in September, 
and the fourth in November 1963. Total Federal cost under 
existing project as of September 30, 1995 is $88,330,669 for 
new work, major rehabilitation cost $10,618,000 and 
$126,815,951 for maintenance, a total cost of $225,764,620. 
(See also Table 10-M.) 
59. WEST POINT LAKE, 
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, 
GA AND AL 
Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 
miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles above 
the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 309.2 miles above 
the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool 
elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the 
reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, 
and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See 
Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) 
Existing project. The existing project provides for flood 
control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and 
streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project 
provides for a gravity-type concrete dam 896 feet long with 
earth embankments at either end 1,111 feet long on the east 
end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of 
the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of 
a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west 
side and an earth embankment retaining wall on the east side; 
a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and 
abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A 
monolith intake-powerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet 
long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. 
At the full power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides 
a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acrefeet 
is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is 
operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to 
provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The 
initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 
1,2 and 3 were placed in operation in March and April, 1975. 
The current installation is 108,375 kilowatts. (See Table 10- 
B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the project 
totaled $5,577,985. Gross power generation amounted to 
221,244,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1995, of which 
213,126,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern 
Power Administration. Recreational attendance during FY 
1995 totaled 2,160,000 visits. 
10-27

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, 
which was initiated in June 1966, and completed at the end of 
FY 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of 
September 30, 1995 is $131,565,760 for new work and 
$77,028,097 for maintenance, a total of $208,593,857 (See 
also Table 10-M.) 
60. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL 
RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 
Mobile District monitors flood control operations of 
Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and 
Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their 
Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black 
Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation 
plans prepared in accordance with Public Law 436, 83rd 
Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal 
year cost for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, 
and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and 
maintenance costs for the Alabama-Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year 
cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall 
operation and maintenance costs for the Black Warrior- 
Tombigbee Rivers System. 
61. FLOOD CONTROL AND 
COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) 
Disaster Preparedness Program ............................ $636,783 
Emergency Operations ............................................ 285,617 
Rehabilitation .................................................. 143,502 
Total FC & CE $1,065,902 
62. NATIONAL EMERGENCY 
PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) 
Mobilization Preparedness ....................................... $50,476 
Government Preparedness.......................................136,843 
Emergency Facilities ................................................. 28,607 
Total NEPP $215,926 
63. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS 
PROGRAM 
Permit Evaluation ............................................ $1,953,161 
Enforcement .......................................................... 480,876 
Studies..........................................................................615 
Other Navigational Regulations ................................ 3,449 
Total Regulatory $2,438,101 
General Investigations 
64. SURVEYS 
During FY 1995, costs of $838,814 were incurred as shown 
below: 
Flood Damage Preventive Studies......................... $252,877 
Navigation Studies................................................ 122,106 
Review of Completed Projects ...................................... 712 
Special Studies ....................................................... 130,167 
Coordination with Other Agencies, 
and non-Federal Interests ........................................ 152,922 
Miscellaneous Activities ......................................... 180,030 
Total Surveys 
65. 
$838,814 
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
BASIC DATA 
Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal 
year with the initiation of Flood Insurance studies, the cost of 
which was reimbursable by FEMA. In addition, Flood Plain 
Management Services were performed at a cost of $267,298 
and $6,526 expended for Hydrologic Studies. (See Table 10- 
P for listings of studies completed during FY 1995.) 
66. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 
AND DESIGN 
Panama City Beaches, FL. The authorized plan consists 
of the placement of a protective beach to elevation 4', with a 
storm berm to elevation 7' with an artificial dune system 
having a top width of 30 feet at elevation 15 and stabilized 
by vegetation. 
A comprehensive damage survey was completed during FY 
1989 as part of the reevaluation effort. Preconstruction, 
Engineering and Design (PED) is currently 78% complete. 
A General Reevaluation Report (GRR) was completed in 
September 1994 and is scheduled for ASA (CW) approval in 
January 1996. After approval of the GRR, remaining PED 
efforts will be terminated and completion of PED 
unscheduled. Fiscal year 1995 expenditures were $582,461. 
Panama City Harbor. The authorized plan of 
improvements are the same as described in existing project 
(see Section 15 in text). Preconstruction Engineering and 
Design (PED) is currently 75% complete. A General 
Reevaluation Report (GRR) was approved in August 1995. 
PED is scheduled to be complete in September 1996. Fiscal 
year 1995 expenditures were $381,159. 
10-28

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
Total FY 1995 expenditures for Preconstruction, 
Engineering and Design (PED) were $967,107; which 
includes $3,487 expended for environmental infrastructure 
at Nancy Creek Basin, Georgia.. 
67. RIVERS AND HARBORS 
CONTRIBUTED FUNDS 
Contributed funds expended for authorized Federal studies 
included: 
Jackson County Water Supply .................................. $-1,605 
Flood Plain M anagement............................................... 840 
Planning Assistance to States .................................. 118,515 
Total Contributed Funds $117,750
10-29

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 10-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
Navigation 
1. Alabama-Coosa 
Rivers, AL and GA 
IA. Claibomrne Lock and 
Dam, AL 
I B. Coosa River, 
Montgomery to 
Gadsden, AL 
2. Apalachicola Bay, 
FL 
3. Apalachicola, 
Chattahoochee 
and Flint Rivers, 
AL and GA 
3A. George W. Andrews 
Lock and Dam, 
AL and GA 
4. Aquatic Plant 
Control 
(Contributed Funds) 
5. Bayou Coden, AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
6. Bayou La Batre, AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
7. Biloxi Harbor, MS 
3,245,400 
3,245,400 
5,258,000 
5,293,066 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
5,121,000 
5,074,840 
7,427,234 
7,568,519 
23,000 
34,558 
5,183,000 
5,150,973
30 
30 
25,000 
5,877 
10,000 
420 
95,341,88824 
95,013,73324 
27,997,450 
27,997,450 
14,986,40023 
14,986,4002" 
2,033,461' 
2,033,461' 
5,046,0582 
5,035,3612 
4,452,16226 
4,452,16226 
109,335,26427 
109,132,59127 
13,038,42729 
13,038,42729 
5,890,000 
5,748,435 
174,000 
152,980 
3,831,300 
3,991,325
30 
30 
38,000 
37,059 
-5,000 
1,532 
4,808,700 
4,865,758 
325,000 
317,814 
7,319,000 
7,292,366
30 
30 
70,000 
77,126 
15,000 
22,176 
534,000 
551,789 
50,000 
4,114 
939,187 
845,887 
21,225 
21,225 
330,701 - 
330,701 
1,228,758 
1,225,895 
100,000 
100,000 
54,000 
51,620 
50,000 
50,000 
326,000 
225,523 
10,000 
10,024 
950,000 
930,720 
1,447,000 
713,191 
20,000 
11,141 
377,000 
81,000 
102,676 
1,752,000 
2,558,508 
380,000 
388,549 
139,000 
450,730 
915,000 
585,628 
50,000 
74,606 
31,000 
27,163 
71,000 
1,053,000 
1,411,896 
3,886,095 
3,882,924 
4,080,746 
4,076,590 
597,500^ 
461,230^ 
1,431,9195 
1,431,9195 
12,947,1956 
12,931,1896 
10-30

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
(Contributed Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
8. Black Warrior & 
Tombigbee Rivers, 
AL 
8A. Jackson Port 
Jackson, AL 
8B. Oliver Lock & Dam 
(Replacement), AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
9. Bon Secour River, 
AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
10. Dauphin Island, 
Bay, AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
11. Dog and Fowl 
Rivers, AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
12. East Pass Channel 
From Gulf of 
Mexico into Choctwhatchee 
Bay, FL 
(Contributed Funds) 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
102,600 
102,600 
16,430,000 
16,229,632 
148,000 
104,401 
4,887,000 
4,405,068 
4,887,000 
4,393,130 
-8,000 
18,595 
1,755 
15,491,000 
15,324,273 
271,000 
179,524 
2,302,000 
1,395,759 
2,302,000 
1,187,825 
13,405 
2,682 
18,693,100 
18,507,566 
165,000 
276,520 
2,500,000 
1,642,866 
2,500,000 
1,687,594 
-4,012 
19,596,000 
19,016,936 
156,000 
175,093 
1,829,946 
1,807,852 
15,000 
-12,917 
238,640 
238,640 
88,461,935' 
88,461,935' 
321,617,0948 
320,266,6848 
52,292,880 
52,292,880 
1,106,000 
1,079,069 
61,409,000 
60,607,330 
62,500,000 
61,557,044 
150,615 
150,615 
1,401,258 
1,364,445 
9,700 
9,700 
292,864 
292,864 
50,000 
43,379 
43,200 
39,235 
850 
100,000 
90,686 
63,200 
295,000 
201,890 
16,246 
-63,200 
243,000 
289,659 
10,000 
7,607 
-1,778 
2,187 
2,468,626 
2,466,045 
41,422 
41,422 
391,354 
391,354 
2,970,686 
2,958,998 
-26,000 
9,724 
197,450 
195,250 
916,715 
916,715 
155,000 
106,016 
161,000 
236,690 
1,650,000 
1,632,360 
681,000 
641,669 
11,045,11 1 
10,980,739 
398,000 
398,000 
10-31

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
13. Fly Creek, AL 
14. Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway between 
Apalachee Bay, FL 
and Mexican Border 
15. Gulfport Harbor, 
MS 
(Contributed Funds) 
16. Mobile Harbor, AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
17. Panama City 
Harbor, FL 
(Contributed Funds) 
18. Pascagoula Harbor, 
MS 
(Contributed Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
19. Pensacola Harbor, 
FL 
(Contributed Funds) 
20. Perdido Pass 
Channel, AL 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
1,000 
1,960,000 
1,994,862 
10,697,000 
10,291,666 
2,881,000 
2,801,508 
3,880,000 
3,833,647 
468,000 
629,610 
20,497,000 
20,425,295 
301,000 
20,000 
67,000 
97,885 
3,194,000 
3,152,528 
253,000 
458,131 
60,000 
72,239 
95,000 
87,641 
3,499,000 
3,477,983 
9,042,000 
9,132,900 
3,407,000 
3,527,809 
5,085,000 
3,266,252 
-48,028 
9,965,000 
9,668,584 
251,878 
73,000 
70,905 
3,368,000 
3,405,837 
66,435 
11,153 
10,000 
17,933 
2,340,000 
2,360,084 
3,281,000 
3,338,907 
1,436,000 
1,414,047 
1,363,082 
57,000 
113,438 
15,565,000 
15,986,627 
29,000 
29,000 
666,721 
-1.599 663,882 
-1.599 
3,414,000 
3,414,781 
205,013 
2,250,000 
2,207,283 
144,999 
73,000 
62,669 
18,251,000 
17,557,637 
29,762 
321,000 
314,006 
289,000 
252,481 
2,281,000 
2,166,315 
840,000 
80,623 
586,000 
57,056 
2,753 
176,000 
138,189 
5,044,000 
4,811,249 
2,643,00 
2,771,101 
2,400,000 
1,206,566 
345,994 
62,000 
60,396 
6,480,2999 
6,480,2999 
72,567,24610 
72,473,37710 
24,079,0001" 
24,005,610" 
49,480,5022 
49404434 ' 
9,495,000 
8,844,049 
96,231,935' 
96,205,279' 
197,327,340's 
I 96,545,798' 
18,452,500 
18,452,500 
1,638,045' S 
1,638,045' 
9,638.013'6 
9,589,213 
' 
80.000 
80,000 
11,905,985" 
I 1,636,714 
58,706.5921" 
58,679,7981" 
3,240,000 
1,287. 1 89 
4,456,884 
4,257,750 
1,469.693" 
1,469,693"9 
8,378,35820 
8,374,7582) 
312.350 
297,587 
629,860 
629,860 
10-32

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
(Contributed Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
21. Tennessee- 
Tombigbee 
Waterway, 
AL and MS 
21A. Tenn-Tom Wildlife 
Mitigation 
Flood Control 
28. Bayview Court 
Bay St. Louis, MS 
(Contributed Funds) 
29. Choctawhatchee and 
Pea Rivers, Elba' 
and Geneva, AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
30. County Road 55, 
Etowah Co., AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
31. Dauphin Island, 
Shoreline, AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
32. East End, 
Dauphin Island, AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
33. Eslava Creek, 
Mobile, AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
34. Gadsden Water 
Treatment Plant 
Gadsden, AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
1,008,000 
988,999 
4,081,000 
12,976,662 
20,660,000 
21,229,316 
17,319,000 
16,342,226 
25,000 
10,213 
25,000 
12,115 
-938,900 
72,463 
10,000 
14,220 
10,327,000 
9,804,160 
19,946,000 
19,363,766 
8,642,000 
8,620,483 
60,000 
51,045 
65,000 
51,854 
65,000 
55,327 
60,000 
93,889 
25,000 
35,662 
6,085,000 
7,880,115 
21,449,350 
21,764,047 
17,024,000 
9,514,923 
133,000 
141,760 
40,000 
1,611 
284,000 
287,911 
102,000 
102,000 
229,000 
251,138 
81,200 
81,200 
475,000 
490,834 
99,200 
133,997 
386,000 
335,608 
116,000 
8,575 
927,000 
926,863 
980,000 
3,168,823 
21,351,000 
20,920,787 
11,081,000 
15,598,516 
264,400 
85,704 
120,800 
239,800 
27,980 
97,300 
10,000 
8,963 
38,389 
-15,000 
2,500 
1,131,000 
1,095,628 
4,003 
34,751 
86,460 
8,770,217 
8,765,741 
510,000 
510,000 
10,325 
10,325 
1,052,594,20021 
1,050,940,3262 
223,710,18522 
222,773,16522 
73,747,000 
68,647,814 
264,400 
85,704 
120,800 
239,800 
27,980 
97,300 
243,000 
241,743 
40,000 
40,000 
359,000 
352,479 
102,000 
102,000 
319,000 
3 18,580 
81,200 
81,200 
4,706,221 
4,669,411 
335,000 
334,004 
386,000 
370,359 
116,000 
95,034 
10-33

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 10-A (Continued) 
S
in
e
ection 
a Text Project 
Hancock Co. School, 
Hancock County, MS 
(Contributed Funds) 
36. North Beach Boulevard 
Bay St. Louis, MS 
37. Okatibbee Dam, 
MS 
38. Portersville Bay-East 
Mobile Co., AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
39. Portersville Bay-West 
Mobile Co., AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
40. Sowashee Creek, 
Meridian, MS 
(Contributed Funds) 
41. Tallahalla Creek, 
Laurel, MS 
(Contributed Funds) 
42. Three Mile Creek, 
Mobile, AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
43. Tombigbee River 
Bridge #6 
Monroe Co., MS 
(Contributed Funds) 
44. Tombigbee River 
(East Fork) 
MS and AL 
45. Tombigbee River 
Tributaries, 
MS and AL 
35. 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
Total Cost to 
FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
67,000 
34,799 
1,806,100 
1,840,500 
213,000 
221,019 
88,000 
85,083 
244,400 
76,092 
110,079 
1,605,000 
1,569,897 
Funding 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
10,000 
1,159 
1,356,000 
1,397,215 
30,000 
18,839 
327,900 
15,000 
30,000 
9,674 
162,700 
3,459,000 
3,048,651 
-116,711 
-355,000 
52,525 
7,808,000 
7,271,007 
516,000 
348,668 
40,000 
37,894
- 
15,000 
16,062 
331,000 
362,221 
30,000 
38,658
- 
1,321,000 
1,400,454 
404,000 
425,658 
312,900 
421,000 
408,676 
162,700 
1,554,000 
1,204,838 
215,000 
205,000 
198,034 
1,029,000 
2,451,626 
61,089 
1,897 
82,000 
92,467 
421,000 
371,237 
320,000 
295,635 
88,000 
85,083 
244,400 
76,092 
110,079 
9,739,528 
9,739,528 
20,185,835 
20,083,557 
519,000 
516,157 
327,900 
327,900 
441,000 
426,966 
162,700 
162,700 
19,281,000 
15,766,315 
1,599,000 
1,146,493 
644,000 
624,091 
40.000 
40,000 
17,085,000 
16,928,278 
1,216,000 
1,154,516 
336,323 
309,203 
109,300 
109,219 
134,801 
134,801 
3,457,201 
3,429,148 
30,423,825 
30,395,003 
10-34 
3,052
- 
-10,000 
8,616
-
- 
3,240,000 
636,445 
-106,000 
110,193 
1,150,000 
1,092,561 
63,000 
36,594 
109,300 
298,000 
276,521 
4,308,000 
631,173 
266,733
- 
81,000 
74,499 
98,207 
120,000 
233,323 
232,818 
109,219 
114,000 
116,275 
510,000 
4,281,847

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
(Contributed Funds) 
46. Upper Gordon Creek 
Hattiesburg, MS 
(Contributed Funds) 
47. Village Creek, 
Birmingham, AL 
(Contributed Funds) 
48. Waveland Seawall 
Waveland, MS 
(Contributed Funds) 
Multiple Purpose Power Projects 
52. Allatoona Dam, 
Coosa River Basin, 
GA 
53. Buford Dam, 
Lake Sidney 
Lanier, GA 
54. Carters Dam and 
Reservoir, GA 
55. Jim Wxoodruff Lock 
and Dam, GA and 
FL 
56. Millers Ferry Lock 
and Dam, AL 
57. Robert F. Henry 
Lock and Dam, AL 
1
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
40,000 
15,035 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
40,000 
53,444 
3,204,000 
2,326,287 
1,028,000 
704,659 
40,000 
28,307 
8,261,100 
8,291,901 
300,000 
35,875 
950,000 
898,560 
130,720 
130,700 
142,000 
1,240,561 
392,783 
84,000 
80,702
- 
8,223,600 
8,452,826 
29,215 
1,823,000 
1,817,149 
-61 
423,611 
192,008 
336,000 
342,975 
133,000 
133,000 
6,173,000 
5,895,074 
434,700 
143,467 
3,640,000 
3,556,910 
130,720 
130,639 
22,207,000 
22,092,529 
7,199,710 
7,200,091 
460,000 
451,984 
133,000 
133,000 
35,709,08525 
35,709,08525 
108,246,524 
107,746,361 
1,620 
6,933,000 
7,053,258 
5,430,000 
5,412,945 
-39,000 
4,345,000 
4,390,701 
3,481,333 
3,681,102 
3,150,333 
2,947,285 
7,216,000 
7,124,458 
3,526,900 
3,643,537 
107 
5,167,900 
5,143,809 
4,211,000 
4,118,803 
3,363,000 
3,472,223 
8,127,400 
8,182,544 
3,998,500 
3,886,696 
6,459,000 
6,558,195 
3,541,000 
3,638,758 
4,141,000 
4,034, 1 50 
8,783,000 
8,545,555 
4,585,000 
4,614,226 
6,001,000 
5,627,012 
3,172,000 
3,101,776 
4,606,000 
4,663,796 
134,169,022 
133,684,532 
111,140,340 
111,140,340 
64,889,984 
64,704,202 
47,978,858 -' 
47,978,858' 
93,515,297 
92,929,229 
63,125,300 
63,125,300 
60,169,211 
59,959,924 
83,360,800 
83,360,800 
44,394,861 
44,197,003 
10-35 
60,000 
75,935 
5,933,000 
5,558,379 
2,045,000 
1,902,299 
6,305,000 
6,281, 198

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
58. Walter F. George New Work: 
Lock and Dam, Approp. -12,111 - - - 88,330,669 2 
AL and GA Cost 3,983 - - - 88,330,6692 
Maint.: 
Approp. 6,228,000 6,432,800 8,427,000 6,968,000 127,195,397 
Cost 6,198,975 6,334,258 8,349,043 6,939,755 126,815,951 
Major Rehab.: 
Approp. - - 24,000 - 10,618,000 
Cost - - 920 - 10,618,000 
59. West Point Lake, New Work: 
Chattahoochee River Approp. - - -3,000 - 131,565,760"- 
Basin, GA and AL Cost - - 473 - 131,565,760 
Maint.: 
Approp. 4,658,200 5,004,000 4,727,000 5,870,000 77,482,908 
Cost 4,504,052 5,210,059 4,776,323 5,577,985 77,028,097 
1. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR 
on Two-Mile. 
2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 
3. Includes $5,650 for previous projects. 
4. Cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by 1965 
River and Harbor Act. 
5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was 
contributed funds. 
6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10,200 was 
contributed funds. 
7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $1,243,661 for 
recreational facilities on completed projects. 
8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 
9. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 
10. Includes $65,137 for previous projects. 
I1. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 
12. Includes $2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 
Special O and M Funds. 
13. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects, $14,000 Public 
Work Funds, and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 
14. Includes $4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 
Special O and M funds. 
15. Includes $203,560 for previous projects, $581,959 Public 
Works Funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing 
project and $48,001 for Grand Lagoon modification. 
16. Includes $513,604 for previous projects. 
17. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 
18. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124,565 Special O 
and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 
19. Includes $594,688 for previous projects. 
20. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 
21. Includes $1,993,000 transferred to National Park Service; 
$210,249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thru FY 1961. 
Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 
22. Includes $234,331 for previous projects. 
23. Includes $3,692,483 for previous projects. 
24. Includes $2,978,050 for previous projects. 
25. Includes $3,347,489 for recreational facilities. 
26. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds, $1,924contributed funds 
for previous projects; and $809,553 for Lazer Creek design and 
$301,310 for Rysco Channel. 
27. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 
28. Includes $8,233,325 for recreational facilities. 
29. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 
30. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, 
Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers projects. 
31. Includes $1,515,822 for recreational facilities. 
32. Includes $2,441,029 for recreational facilities. 
33. Includes $35,045 for previous project costs. 
10-36

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Nov. 21, 1963' 
Feb. 5, 1975' 
Aug. 11, 1983' 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jun. 2, 1969' 
Oct. 27, 1965 
APALACHICOLA BAY, FL (See Section 2 of Text) 
Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels. 
10 feet deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep 
through Bulkhead Shoals. 
Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth 
of inner bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, 
and 10-foot depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel. 
At Eastpoint, FL., a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 
6,000 feet long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 
feet deep and 100 feet wide to St. George Sound, and at 
Apalachicola, FL., a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, 
with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through 
Scipio Creek to the Apalachicola River. 
Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 
feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across 
St. George Island to within 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence 
increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and 
continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf, with 
two jetties extending from the dune line on St. George Island 
to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass 
Channel upon completion of channel through St. George Island. 
Modify improvement of Apalachicola Bay, FL, authorized 
by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide 
that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests 
for such approved work as they may have done based upon 
the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be 
removed to provide project dimensions at such time as 
Federal dredging of the channel is undertaken. 
A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about I mile long, parallel 
to shore at Two Mile, FL, with a 6-by 100-foot connecting 
channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. 
A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern 
end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling 
the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect 
with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south 
of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to 
elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward 
side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. 
The total length of the breakwater of about 6,150 feet, includes 
two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. 
Modify Eastpoint project to include breakwaters with a 
total length of 5,300 feet. 
AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 4 of Text) 
Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., Fl., Al., Ms., 
and La. 
Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. 
Provided for continued research. 
Increased non-federal cost-sharing from 30% to 50%. 
BAYOU CODEN, AL (See Section 5 of Text) 
Channel 4 by 40 feet. 
Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre 
channel. 
BAYOU LA BATRE, AL (See Section 6 of Text) 
A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound 
to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, 
thence a channel 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall 
distance of about 33,500 feet. 
10-37 
H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 106, 69th Cong., 
Ist Sess. 
H. Doc. 156, 82d Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., 
2d Sess. 
DPR (Sec. 107) 
DPR (Sec. 107) 
DPR (Sec. 107) 
H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Public law 87-874 
87th Cong. 
H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 
Ist Sess. 
Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) 
H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
DPR (Sec. 107) 
H. Doc. 327, 88th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
TABLE 10-B

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Nov. 28, 1990 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Jun. 20, 1938 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
May 17, 1950 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Nov. 7, 1966 
Mar. 28, 1979' 
Aug. 15, 1985 
Jul. 5, 1884 
Mar. 3, 1899 
Sep. 19, 1890 
Sep. 19, 1890 
Deepen existing channel to 18 feet to the bridge; to 14 feet 
above bridge, and into Snake Bayou at a depth of 12 feet. 
BILOXI HARBOR, MS (See Section 7 of Text) 
Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi 
Sound west and north of Deer Island to deep water in 
Back Bay of Biloxi. 
Relocation of channel. 
Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old 
Fort Bayou. 
Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through 
Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. 
Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi 
Harbor to Ott Bayou. 
Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound 
the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Back Bay 
and Cranes Neck. 
A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet 
wide from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through: 
Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island), Back Bay, 
Big Lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500 
by 2,600-foot turning basin in the lake, thence, a channel 
12 by 100 feet from the western end of Gulfport lake for 
about 2 miles to a 300- by 500- foot turning basin; adoption 
for maintenance of a 12- by 150 foot spur channel from the 
main channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about I mile to a 
400- by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and 
abandonment of the existing 6- by 40- foot channel into 
Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150- 
foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main 
channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; continuation 
of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. 
A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending 
northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel and, into a rectangular 
basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. 
A channel 12-feet deep; 130-feet wide and 2,100-feet long, and a 
300 by 300 foot turning basin also to a 12-foot depth. 
BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL 
(See Section 8 of Text) 
Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. 
Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by 
Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887 
Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. 
(Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below 
lock 1 to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) 
Construction of locks and dams, 1, 2, and 3. Merging of 
the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior 
Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopolis 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) 
H. Doc. 754, 69th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 639, 75th Cong., 
3d Sess. 
H. Doc. 258, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 326, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 256, 81st Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
DPR (Sec. 107) 
DPR (Sec. 107) 
Annual Report, 1887, 
pt. 2, p. 1302. 
H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 
2d Sess., and Annual 
Report, 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858 
H. Doc. 165, 57th Cong., 
Ist Sess., and Annual 
Report, 1902, p. 1293 
10-38

TABLE 10-B (Continued) 
MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Mar. 3, 1909 
Aug. 22, 1911 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Jun. 26, 1934 
Dec. 22, 1944 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Dec. 21, 1982 
Jul. 30, 1983 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Construction of locks and dams 14, 15, 16, and 17. 
Provides for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified 
in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical 
maintenance and operation. 
Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet, and construction of locks 
and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project. 
Extension of slack-water improvement on Sanders Ferry 
on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. 
Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 
feet at lock I to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at 
low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where 
practicable. 
For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw 
Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers. 
Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct 
crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all 
dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. 
Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace 
original locks and dams 10, 11, and 12. 
Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with 
funds from War Department appropriations for rivers harbors. 
Recreation facilities. 
Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace 
existing dams 4, 5, 6, and 7. 
Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. 
Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. 
Provides for a wider navigation opening at the Franklin 
Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. 
Authorized to widen, as necessary for safe passage, 
the navigation opening of Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. 
Conduct a feasibility study of protection from 
erosion problems on the southern bank from 
river mile 253 to river mile 255. 
JACKSON PORT, AL (See Section 8A of Text) 
Construct a spur canal 9 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 1000 
feet long in conjunction with the realignment project on 
the existing navigation proejct. (Jackson Port) 
OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL 
(See Section 8B of Text) 
Construction and land acquisition for Oliver Lock 
Replacement 
Construction of a lock and dam to replace the 
William Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam. 
10-39 
Public law 317 
H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Annual Report, 1918, 
P. 876 
H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 
3d Sess. 
H. Doc. 56, 73d Cong., 
1st Sess., and Rivers 
and Harbors and Committee 
Doc. 45 73d Cong. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 26. 
74th Cong., I1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Public Law 97, 377 
Public Law 98-63 
Water Resource Development 
Act of 1986 
(P.L. 99-662) 
Energy and Water 
Development Appropriation 
Act of 1987 
(P.L. 99-591) 
The Supplemental 
Appropriations Act, 1985 
(P.L. 99-88) 
Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 
(P.L. 99-662) 
Oct. 18, 1986 
Aug. 15, 1985 
Nov. 17, 1986

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts . Work Authorized Documents 
May 16, 1963' 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Aug. 16, 1991 
Jun. 23, 1993 
May 19, 1969' 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Oct. 24, 1951 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Oct. 1, 1980 
May 17, 1950 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Jun. 25, 1910 
BON SECOUR RIVER, AL (See Section 9 of Text) 
A 10- by 100-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through 
Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up 
river to vicinity of Swift's Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a 
point 600 feet above Oak Landing, with two turning and maneuvering 
areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 and 1,200 feet long opposite Swift's 
Landing and ice loading dock. Overall length of improvement is about 
4.7 miles. 
DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL (See Section 10 of Text) 
A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to 
an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in 
marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a 
channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin 
to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect 
entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 
feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel 
of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, 
extending to 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. 
Deepen existing 4-foot channel to 7-feet and 40-feet wide from 
anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay. 
Provides 400 feet of stone protection along the shoreline near the 
pier and erosion protection for shoreline in the immediate 
vicinity of Fort Gaines. 
DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL (See Section 11 of Text) 
To provide small craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. 
EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO 
CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL (See Section 12 of Text) 
Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from 
Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. 
Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay 
into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. 
Construction of twin jetties. 
(Present project dimensions.) 
Modifications to provide a channel length of approximately 3,800 
feet in lieu of 2,000 feet from the East Pass Channel into 
Old Pass Lagoon, with no changes in width and depth. 
FLY CREEK, FAIRHOPE, AL (See Section 13 of Text) 
A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 
feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning 
basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. 
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN 
APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER 
(Mobile District) (See Section 14 of Text) 
APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FL 
A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet 
wide at the bottom. 
A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet 
wide at the bottom. 
CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FL 
A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide 
at the bottom. 
A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no 
reference to width. 
10-40 
DPR (Sec. 107) 
H. Doc. 333, 76th Cong., 
Ist Sess. 
H. Doc. 394, 82d Cong., 
2d Sess. 
DPR (Sec. 107) 
DPR (Sec. 14) 
DPR (Sec. 107) 
H. Doc. 209, 70th Congress 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 194, 88th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
Energy and Water Development 
Appropriation 
H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 
Ist Sess. 
H. Doc. 670, 61st Cong., 
2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 52. 
72d Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong.. 
i st Sess. 
H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong.. 
2d Sess.

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 10-B (Continued) 
Acts 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Work Authorized 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Jul. 23, 1942 
Jun. 17, 1943 
Mar. 2, 1945 
May 17, 1950 
Nov. 7, 1966 
Mar. 3, 1899 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Feb. 27, 1911 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Jul. 23, 1930 
Jun. 30, 1948 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Aug. 15, 1985 
CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FL 
A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet 
wide at the bottom. 
PENSACOLA BAY, FL, TO MOBILE BAY, AL 
A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet 
wide at the bottom. 
MOBILE BAY, AL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA 
A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 
foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour 
in Mississippi Sound. 
A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake 
Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. 
APALACHEE BAY, FL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA 
A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low 
water, except in the section between Mobile, Al., 
and New Orleans, La., where the width is to be 
150 feet. 
Conditional acquisition of Gulf County Canal, Fl. 
and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 
feet wide. 
Construction of a movable span in the Georgia, Florida 
& Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River. 
Abandonment and closure of original channel between 
Big Lagoon and Pensacola Bay and construction of a 
new channel to enter the bay north of original entrance. 
Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by 
125 feet. 
GULFPORT HARBOR, MS (See Section 15 of Text) 
A channel 19 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the 
anchorage basin at Ship Island to Gulfport, Ms., and an 
anchorage basin next to the shore end 19 feet deep and not 
less than 2,640 feet by 1,320 feet in area. 
Combined Ship Island Pass with Gulfport Harbor project. 
Increased depth to 26 feet and width to 300 feet across 
Ship Island Bar and depth to 19 feet in channel from 
anchorage basin at Ship Island to anchorage basin at Gulfport. 
Authorized relocation of channel across Ship Island Bar. 
Increased depth to 27 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship 
Island Bar, 26 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. 
Sound and depth of 26 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. 
Increased depth of 32 feet and width to 30 feet across Ship 
Island Bar, 30 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound 
and a depth of 30 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. 
Maintenance of the existing commercial small-boat harbor 
and an approach channel 100 feet wide and 4,300 feet 
long, from deep water in Ms. Sound to the small-boat 
basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. 
Modify the existing Ship Channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi 
Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in 
the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage 
basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. 
10-41 
Documents 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 42, 
73d Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 4, 
71st Cong., I1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 
2d Sess. 
Public Law 675, 77th 
Cong., 2d Sess., and 
H. Doc. 96, 79th 
Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess., and Public 
Law 75, 78th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., 
Ist Sess. 
Public Law 89-789, 89th 
Cong. 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 120, 55th Cong., 
3d Sess. 
H. Doc. 2, 60th Cong., 
Ist Sess. 
H. Doc. 692, 69th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 112, 81st Cong., 
Ist Sess. 
S. Doc. 123, 84th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
The Supplemental 
Appropriations 
Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88)

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 17, 1988 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Jul. 26, 1970 (SR) 
Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) 
Aug. 15, 1985 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. 
Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in 
open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all 
provisions of Federal law. 
Modify of WRDA of 1986 and authorize 
disposal of dredged material in open waters 
of the Gulf of Mexico; and by Thin-layer disposal 
in Mississippi Sound under a demonstration program. 
MOBILE HARBOR, AL (See Section 16 of Text) 
For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from 
Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. 
Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from 
Choctaw Point in Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet 
wide, with 2 turning basins. Adoption of the existing 
channel alongside Arlington pier from the of Garrows 
Bend Channel, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 
25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River 
from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, 
then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to 
a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. 
Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 42 by 600 feet. 
Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. 
Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridge to 
40 feet over present widths, including existing turning 
basin and anchorage areas. Widening river channel 
opposite Mazagine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 
1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further 
modified for maintenance by SAD letter of November 27, 
1973 under authority contained in ER-1130-2-307 to 
increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' by 1600'. 
Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and 
operation of an earth-filled causeway across said channel 
(work to be done by local interests). 
To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from 
the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending 
northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile 
Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the 
shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 
about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning 
basin 40 feet deep and approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; 
a barge channel 12- by 100-feet extending 6500-feet and 
and terminating in a 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin. 
Deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 by 
700 feet, a distance of about 7.4 miles, deepen and widen 
Mobile Bay Channel from mouth of bay to south of Mobile 
River, 55 by 550 feet, a distance of about 27.0 miles, deepen 
and widen an additional 4.2 miles of Mobile Bay Channel to 
55 by 650 feet, provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning 
basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island, and construct a 1710 
acre disposal area adjacent to the Brookley Industrial Complex. 
Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. 
Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open 
water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions 
of Federal law. 
10-42 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1986 
(P.L. 99-662) 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1988 
(P.L. 100-676) 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 69, 
74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 74, 83d Congress, 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 
2d Sess. 
(Under provision of 
Section 201 of the 
1965 Flood Control) 
The Supplemental 
Appropriations Act. 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1986 
(P.L. 99-662)

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 10-B (Continued) 
Acts 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Work Authorized 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jun. 30, 1948 
Mar. 23, 1967' 
Jun. 14, 1972 
Mar. 4, 1913 
Mar. 4, 1915 
May 17, 1950 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Jul. 14, 1967 
Oct. 23, 1962 
PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL 
Shoreline protection to provide a 110-foot wide beach with an 
artificial dune system and stabilization of vegetation. 
PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL (See Section 17 of Text) 
Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted 
by act of June 25, 1910. 
Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide 
and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew bay to 
the highway bridge. 
Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. 
A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagoon from St. Andrew 
Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 
392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities 
which terminate at the bridge. 
Channels 38, 40, 42 feet deep. 
PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS (See Section 18 of Text) 
Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on 
Dog River, 25 by 300 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 
22 by 225 feet across Mississippi Sound and up 150 feet 
in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 
4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. 
Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests. 
Cutoff channel, 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge 
to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. 
Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 
feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet 
across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the 
railroad bridge, and a turning basin just below the bridge. 
Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River 
cutoff ($44,000). 
Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot 
channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30-by 
225-foot side channel from main ship channel in 
Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 
30 by 300 feet in Bayou Casotte to a turning basin of the 
same depth 1 mile above the mouth. 
Deepening the Horn Island Pass channel to 38 feet and 
deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound, 
the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning 
basin all to 33 feet. 
Enlarging Horn Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet 
provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of 
channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet 
long, enlarging main channel in Mississippi Sound and 
river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and 
deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte 
channels and basin to 38 feet. 
Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 
(PL. 99-662) 
H. Doc. 33, 73d Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 555, 76th Cong., 
3d Sess. 
H. Doc. 559, 80th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
DPR (Sec. 107) 
H. Doc. 196, 92d Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., 
River and Harbor 
Committee Doc. 12, 
63d Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 188, 81st Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 98, 96th Cong., 
H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., 
Ist Sess. 
Chief of Engineers Report 
dated Nov. 3, 1960. 
H. Doc. 560, 87th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
10-43 
Documents

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Jul. 11, 1983' 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Aug. 27, 1962 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Jul. 24, 1946 
Modification to provide for channel dimensions 12 by 80 feet 
extending abut 2,750 feet from deep waters in the 
Pascagoula River into Krebs Lake to a turning basin, thence, 
along the south bank of the lake a channel with dimensions 
of 10 x 60 feet terminating at a second turning basin, a 
distance of about 2,750 feet. The project was constructed 
by hydraulic dredging with the disposal placed in an 
upland diked area. 
Deepen and widen gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; 
widen Horn Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that 
channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi 
Sound portion to 42 feet; widen and deepen Bayou Casotte 
to 42 by 350 feet and construct turning basin. Disposal of all 
new work material in Gulf of Mexico. 
PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL (See Section 19 of Text) 
A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide 
from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of 
the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may 
be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. 
Modified the existing project for the present inner channels 
and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. 
Improvements of Bayou Chico. 
Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico 
to lower Pensacola Bay, a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions 
of 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along 
the south side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of 
about 2.5 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a 
bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; 
parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor 
channel, about 1.3 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 300 
feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor 
channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor 
channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet. 
PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL (See Section 20 of Text) 
A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemount 
jetties, from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 
9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the 
same dimensions into Terry Cove. 
TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS 
(See Section 21 of Text) 
A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via 
East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. 
Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section, 
9- by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis 
and Amory, Ms.; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for 46 miles 
from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section, 12 by 300 feet 
(except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width 
be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through dividing 
ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished 
by 10 locks. Total length of project is 234 miles. 
10-44 
DPR (Sec. 107) 
Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 
(P.L. 99-662) 
H. Doc. 253, 72d Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 96, 
74th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 528, 87th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 94, 88th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 
2d Sess.

TABLE 10-B (Continued) 
MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 8, 1995 
Sep. 11, 1995 
Mar. 23, 1994 " 
Sep. 10, 19872 
Jul. 21, 1994 " 
Aug. 5, 1995 
Nov. 8, 1995 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Sep. 27, 1990' 
Sep. 27, 19901 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Sep. 30. 19882 
TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WILDLIFE MITIGATION 
(See Section 21A of Text) 
Acquire from willing sellers in a timely manner at fair 
market value 88,000 acres of land for mitigation of wildlife 
losses resulting from construction and operation of the 
project for the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. 
BAYVIEW COURT, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS (See Section 28 of Text) 
Provide a 700 linear-foot concrete block revetment 
for beach erosion protection. 
CHOCTAWHATCHEE/PEA RIVERS, ELBA 
AND GENEVA, AL (See Section 29 of Text) 
Install fourteen (14) combination rain and stream gages 
within Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins. 
COUNTY ROAD 55, ETOWAH CO., AL 
(See Section 30 of Text) 
Excavation of loose roadway embankment, placement of riprap, 
and installation of a French drain. 
ESLAVA CREEK, MOBILE, AL (See Section 33 of Text) 
Channel enlargement, bank stabilization measures, and increasing 
the size of the box culvert at Airport Boulevard by adding 
an additional barrel. 
GADSDEN-WATER TREATMENT PLANT, AL 
(See Section 34 of Text) 
Provides riprapped slope protection for 80 feet upstream, and 
80 feet downstream of an intake structure. 
HANCOCK COUNTY SEAWALL, HANCOCK CO, MS 
(See Section 35 of Text) 
Provide a 990-foot timber bulkhead, two (2) feet in front of an 
existing concrete seawall for shoreline protection. 
NORTH BEACH BOULEVARD, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS 
(See Section 36 of Text) 
Provide a 700 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall in front of an 
existing concrete seawall for beach erosion protection. 
OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS (See Section 37 of Text) 
Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water 
supply, water quality control, and recreation. 
PORTERSVILLE BAY - EAST, MOBILE CO., AL 
(See Section 38 of Text) 
Provide shoreline bank protection along 5,600 feet of Shell Belt Road. 
PORTERSVILLE BAY - WEST, MOBILE CO., AL 
(See Section 39 of Text) 
Provide shoreline bank protection along 3,500 feet of Shell Belt Road. 
SOWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MS (See Section 40 of Text) 
Channel enlargement, and clearing and snagging over a reach of 10.5 miles. 
One railroad bridge and several highway roads and bridges and utilities 
will require modification for the channel improvement. Development 
of recreation facilities. 
TALLAHALLA CREEK, LAUREL, MS 
(See Section 41 of Text) 
Channel clearing and snagging with overbank clearing of brush and 
trees less than 4 inches diameter for a distance of 30 feet on each bank. 
Water Resource Development 
Act of 1986 
(P.L. 99-662) 
DPR (Sec. 103) 
DPR (Sec. 205) 
DPR (Sec. 14) 
DPR (Sec. 205) 
DPR (Sec. 14) 
DPR (Sec. 14) 
DPR (Sec. 103) 
H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
DPR (Sec. 14) 
DPR (Sec. 14) 
Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 
(P.L. 99-662) 
DPR (Sec. 205) 
10-45

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Jun. 30, 19944 
Aug. 18, 1941 
Jul. 23, 1958 
Jul. 8, 1980 
Oct. 13, 19882 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 28, 1990 
Apr. 12, 1995 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jun. 28, 1954 
May 25, 1982 
THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL (See Section 42 of Text) 
Channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream 
of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 
or a total distance of 5.6 miles. Development of recreational facilities. 
TOMBIGBEE RIVER BRIDGE #6, MONROE CO., MS 
(See Section 43 of Text) 
Provides a rock training dike, riprap revetment blankets, and an 
overbank drainage structure. 
TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL 
(See Section 44 of Text) 
Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River 
by clearing, snagging, and excavation of 13 cut-off 
channels, and other related channel improvements. 
TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL 
(See Section 45 of Text) 
Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee 
River. 
Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and 
eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. 
UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS 
(See Section 46 of Text) 
Real Estate acquisition of nine (9) residences; habitat mitigation 
and channel enlargement. 
VILLAGE CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, 
BIRMINGHAM, AL (See Section 47 of Text) 
Basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures in six 
separate neighborhoods from floodplain; enlarge 2 miles of channel 
and relocate necessary facilities; Install flood warning devices. 
Authorized the Secretary to acquire private vacant lands within the 
definite project boundaries established in the Real Estate Design 
Memorandum as a nonstructural element of the project. 
WAVELAND SEAWALL, WAVELAND, MS 
(See Section 48 of Text) 
Provide a 1,008 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall segment, and a 500 
linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall in front of an existing 
concrete seawall. 
MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 
ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and 
tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, 
and other purposes. 
Authorized construction of Carters Lake, GA, Claiborne Lock 
and Dam, AL, Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, AL, and Millers 
Ferry Lock and Dam, AL. 
Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests 
to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. 
Designated change of name from Jones Bluff to 
Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam 
10-46 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) 
DPR (Sec. 14) 
Special Report on Record 
in Oct. (P.L. 222) 
77th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 167, 84th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Supplemental Appropriations 
and Recession Act 
DPR (Sec. 205) 
1980 (P.L. 96-304) 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) 
DPR (Sec. 14) 
H. Doc. 414, 77th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Public Law 436, 83rd 
Cong. 
S.2034 97th 
Cong., 2d Sess.

TABLE 10-B (Continued) 
MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Aug. 18, 1941 
Dec. 22, 1944 
Modification to the plan for the Coosa River segment of the 
waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden, AL to carry 
out planning, engineering, and design in accordance with 
the Montgomery to Gadsden, Coosa River Channel, AL 
Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. 
ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA 
(See Section 52 of Text) 
Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation 
of stream flow for navigation, development of hydroelectric 
power and recreation. 
APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT 
RIVERS, AL, GA AND FL (See Section 3 of Text) 
Development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint 
Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. 
Modified general plan for full development of Apalachicola, 
Chattahoochee, and Flint River System and authorized 
construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. 
Authorized recreation facilities. 
Modified the existing project to provide for 9- foot 
deep by 100-foot wide side channel into the Apalachicola 
River Industrial Park, Blountstown, Fl. 
APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT 
Modified Rivers and Harbors Act of 1945 to restore and 
maintain access to bendways and interconnecting waterways 
in the course of routine maintenance dredging; and 
to acquire lands for and to construct, operate, and 
maintain water-related public use and access facilities. 
LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA (See Section 53 of Text) 
Provision of recreation facilities. 
GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA 
(See Section 3A of Text) 
Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site 
and low dam at George W. Andrews site. 
Provided recreation facilities. 
JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL 
(See Section 55 of Text) 
Provided for recreation facilities. 
WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA 
(See Section 58 of Text) 
Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George 
site and low dam at Columbia site. 
WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER 
BASIN, GA AND AL (See Section 59 of Text) 
Authorized construction for flood control, power, 
recreation, fish and wildlife development, and 
streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. 
1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 River 
and Harbor Act, as amended. 
2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood 
Control Act of 1948, as amended. 
3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 of Flood 
Control Act of 1954, as amended. 
4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 14 of Flood 
Control Act of 1946, as amended. 
10-47 
Water Resources 
Develoment Act 
of 1986 
(P.L. 99-662) 
Public Law 228, 77th 
Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 674, 76 Cong., 
3d Sess. 
H. Doc. 342, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., 
Ist Sess. 
DPR (Sec. 107) 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1986 
(P.L. 99-662) 
H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Comm. on 
Public Works 
H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 24, 1946 
Dec. 22, 1944 
Jan. 27, 1981' 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Jul. 24, 1944 
Jul. 24, 1946 
Dec. 22, 1944 
Dec. 22, 1944 
May 19, 1953 
Oct. 23, 1963

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 10-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation 
Report For Construction Maintenance 
Blackwater River, FL 1981 $41,650 $330,433 
Bluff Creek, MS' 1963 1,000 6,883 
Cadet Bayou, MS 1984 87,921 1,160,580 
Cahaba River, AL2 1894 45,000- 
Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, FL 1979 481,627 434,706 
Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL 1973 171,885 291,694 
Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL 1981 208,499 1,168,660 
Holmes Creek, FL 1931 8,562 36,800 
LaGrange Bayou, FL 1972 289,496 150,635 
Leaf and Chickasawhay River, MS 2 1919 23,090 42,676 
Noxubee River, MS' 1902 47,528 14,472 
Ochlockonee (Ochlockney) River, GA and FL' 2 1900 5,000- 
Old Town Creek' 2 1887 3,000- 
Oostanaula and Coosawattee River, GA 2 1907 32,656- 
Panacea Harbor, FL 1979 122,383 106,446 
Pascagoula River, MS 1956 15,000 179,535 
Pass Christian Harbor, MS 1976 59,313 776,972 
Port St. Joe Harbor, FL 1984 1,960,862 2,965,283 
Removing Water Hyacinths 1984 - 1,100,471 
St. Marks River, FL 1965 1,710,809 87,379 
Tallapoosa River, AL2 1893 43,972 
Tombigbee River at Columbus Port, MS 1988 500,500 
Upper Chipola River, FL 
from Marianna to its' mouth' 2 1941 36,781 63,193 
Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS 1979 29,195 481,515 
1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 
2. Uncompleted portion of project deauthorized by H. Doc. 96-157, 
I st Session. 
TABLE 10-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation 
Report For Construction Maintenance 2 
Harrison County, MS, shore protection' 1953 $1,133.000 
I. Completed. 
2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local 
interests. 
10-48

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
Alabama River at Montgomery, AL s ' 
Armuchee Creek, GA 
Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA 
Big Brown Creek, Prentiss Co., MS 
Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, MS 
Black Creek, Gadsden, AL 
Black Warrior River, U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL 
Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL 
Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL 
Burketts Creek, Amory, MS 
Chattahxoochee River, Eufaula, AL 
Chickasaw Bogue Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, AL 
Clanton, AL 
Collinsville, AL 
County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS 
Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL 
Fort Toulouse, Wetumpka, AL 
Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw Co., MS 
Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS 
Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa Co., FL 
Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, AL 
Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry Co., MS 
Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties, MS 
Houston Schxool Rd. Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS 
Hurricane Creek, Prentiss Co., MS 
Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL 
Lake Douglas, Decatur County, GA 
Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS 
Leaf River, County Road Bridge, Mahned, MS 
Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL 
Magby Creek, Columbus, MS 
Martin Creek, Prentiss County, MS 
Mill Creek, Dalton, GA 
Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS 
Mound State Park, Moundville, AL 
Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL 
Murder Creek, Brewton, AL 
Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL 
Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS 
Old Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS 
Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 
Prattville, Autauga Creek, AL 
Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA 
Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, GA 
Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA 
Rome. Coxosa River, GA 
Sewerline Protection, Valley, AL 
Silver Creek, Rome, GA 
Sope Creek, Marietta, GA 
Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS 
Sun Creek, Okibbeha County, MS 
Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw County, MS 
Tallahala Creek, Pascagoula River, MS 
Town Creek, Americus, GA 
Trim Cane Creek, Okibbeha County, MS 
Trussville, AL 
Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, MS 
West Point, Chattahoxchee River, GA 
Whorton's Bend Road, Etowah Co., AL 
Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 
Wolf Creek, U.S. Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 
Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, GA 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual 
Report For 
1965 
1966 
1958 
1987 
1985 
1953 
1986 
1994 
1987 
1984 
1988 
1985 
1964 
1940 
1992 
1994 
1994 
1988 
1985 
1991 
1990 
1991 
1982 
1988 
1992 
1987 
1970 
1990 
1986 
1991 
1991 
1988 
1992 
1994 
1994 
1980 
1994 
1986 
1988 
1987 
1985 
1946 
1994 
1985 
1994 
1955 
1989 
1992 
1990 
1956 
1984 
1988 
1988 
1965 
1984 
1965 
1986 
1955 
1991 
1985 
1986 
1966 
1. Engineering, design, supervision, and administration (no construction work 
has been done. Includes $17,000 for pre-authorization studies.) 
2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 
10-49 
TABLE 10-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Cost to September 30,1995 
Operation 
Construction Maintenance= 
$144,194 
115,547 
149,815 
137,500 
132,174 
125,389 
181,500 
147,200 
178,600 
1,366,454 
206,600 
121,718 
274,024 
71,119 
116,800 
1,848,327 
368,000 
91,500 
802,026 
147,432 
71,000 
268,691 
238,219 
59,300 
52,803 
155,200 
164,998 
1,585,000 
231,618 
144,047 
156,508 
78,500 
474,065 
157,340 
789,000 
190,974 
1,215,000 
903,474 
119,500 
143,936 
250,000 
649,280 
870,000 
85,029 
385,300 
384,550 
180,937 
604,719 
1,538,555 
142,637 
55,569 
81,000 
3,945,757 
340,409 
145,519 
141,334 
215,860 
599,637 
448,956 
114,753 
154,641 
330,734

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 10-G 
Project 
Bayou Galere, MS' 
Buttahatchee Creek, MS 2 
(Auth. P.L. 96-304) 
GIWW; Apalachicola Bay to 
St. Marks River, FL 
Lazer Creek Lake, GA 
Little Browns Creek, AL 2 
(Auth. P.L. 96-304) 
Lower Auchumpkee Creek, 
GA 
Noxubee River, MS 2 
(Auth. P.L. 96-304) 
Pensacola Harxbor Modification, FL 
Sipsey River, AL2 
(Auth. P.L. 96-304) 
Tombigbee River, AL & MS2 
(Auth. 1941 Act) 
Westfork, MS
2 
(Auth. P.L. 96-304) 
Type 
Navigation 
Flood Control 
Navigation 
Hydroelectric pow 
Flood Control 
Hydroelectric potw 
Fkxx Control 
Navigation 
Flxood Control 
Fkl(xd Control 
Flood Control 
DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
Year of Last Deauthorization 
Full Report Document 
1946 H. Doc. 192, 94th Cong., 
1st Sess., as amended. 
1989 Public Law 99-662 
99th Congress 
1986 Public Law 99-662, 
99th Congress 
ver 1986 Public Law 99-662, 
99th Congress 
1989 Public Law 99-662 
99th Congress 
ver 1986 Public Law 99-662, 
99th Congress 
1989 Public Law 99-662 
99th Congress 
1986 Public Law 99-662 
99th Congress 
1989 Public Law 99-662 
99th Congress 
n/a Public Law 99-662 
99th Congress 
1989 Public Law 99-662 
99th Congress 
1. H. Doc. 96-157 deauthorized uncompleted portions of certain 
projects as shown in Table 10-C. 
2. Deauthorized tributaries of Tombigbee River improvements. 
TABLE 10-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION
Fiscal year 
Study Authority 1995 Costs 
Ocean Springs Harbor, MS 107 0 
Ochlockonee Bay, Wakulla Co., FL 107 0 
Oostanaula and Cxoosa Rivers, GA 107 47,926 
Total $47,926 
10-50 
Date 
Date 
Deauthorized 
Aug. 5, 1977 
Jul. 9, 1995 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Jul. 9, 1995 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Jan. 1,1990 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Jan. 1,1990 
Jan. 1,1990 
Jan. 1,1990 
.

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 10-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Fiscal year 
Study Authority 1995 Costs 
Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA 205 36,000 
Big Escambia Creek, Escambia, AL 205 4,961 
Black Warrior River, North Port, AL 205 99,523 
Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, AL & FL 205 29,404 
Flint River, Albany, GA 205 37,244 
Flint River, Newton, GA 205 24,878 
Kinchafoone Creek, GA 205 37,076 
Mill Creek, McGee, MS 205 12,795 
Muckalee Creek, GA 205 23,420 
North Shore, Santa Rosa Island, FL 205 2,632 
Peachtree Creek, Basin, Atlanta, GA 205 19,566 
Pensacola Beach, FL 205 
Silver Creek Tributary, Rome, GA 205 7,612 
Sweetwater Creek, Austell, GA 205 57,753 
Town Creek Tributary, Jasper, AL 205 32,481 
Kings Creek, MS 14 87,694 
Round Island, MS 14 12,351 
Total $525,390 
10-51

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 10-K 
Project 
RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS 
Cost During 
Fiscal Year 
Apalachicola Bay, FL 
Bayou La Batre, AL 
Biloxi Harbor, MS 
Blackwater River, FL 
Bon Secour, AL 
Cadet Bayou, MS 
Carrabelle Harbor, FL 
East Pass Channel, FL 
Fly Creek, AL 
La Grange Bayou, FL 
Panacea, FL 
Panama City, FL 
Pascagoula, MS 
Pensacola Harbor, FL 
St. Marks River, FL 
Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS 
Total 
$26,728 
1,572 
29,500 
17,064 
11,250 
4,375 
23,269 
19,583 
2,500 
7,110 
5,575 
2,122 
25,254 
17,236 
9,421 
6,875 
$138,868 
TABLE 10-L ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA 
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
Claiborne Millers Ferry Robert F. Henry Carters Allatoona 
Proposed Structures Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lake Dam3 Dam 
Miles above mouth of river 81.1' 42.2' 245.4' 26.82 47.84 
Nearest town Claiborne, AL Camden, AL Benton, AL Carters, GA Cartersville, GA 
Distance (miles) 7 10 3 2 4 
Greatest lock length available 
for full width (feet) 600 600 600 - - 
Width of lock chamber (feet) 84 84 84 - - 
Maximum lift (feet) 30 48 47 - - 
Elevation of normal pool surface 
(mean sea level) 35 80 125 1072 840 
Depth over sills at low water 
(feet) 13 Upper 15 Upper 15- 
Lower 13 Lower 12 
Character of foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock 
Kind of spillway Gated and Gated Gated Gated Gated 
Fixed Crest 
Height of dam (feet) 95.5 99.5 94 451 190 
Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Rock-fill Concrete 
Earth Core 
Total reservoir capacity 
(acre-feet) 96,360 331,800 234,200 472,800 670,050 
Power development (kw) - 75,000 68,000 500,000 74,000 
Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 
Cost to date:5 $27,997,450 $63,125,300 $83,360,800 $111,140,340 $35,709,085 
1. Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles). 
2. Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). 
3. Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 
4. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). 
5. Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 10A. 
10-52

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 10-M 
APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL, 
LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE 
DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT 
(See Section 3 of Text) 
Existing Projects 
Jim George W. Walter F. Buford Dam 
Woodruff Andrews George Lake 
Lock Lock Lock West Point Sidney 
and Dam and Dam and Dam Lake Lanier 
Miles above mouth 107.6' 46.52 75.02 201.42 348.32 
Nearest town Chattahoochee, FL Columbia, AL Ft. Gaines, GA West Point, GA Buford, GA 
Distance (miles) 1 1 2 2.8 5 
Greatest lock length 450 450 450 - - 
and available for full width (feet) 
Width of chamber (feet) 82 82 82 - - 
Maximum lift (feet) 33 25 88 - - 
Elevation of normal pool 77 102 190(Summer) 635(Summer) 1071(Summer) 
surface (msl) 185(Winter) 625(Winter) 1070(Winter) 
Depth over sills at low 14 13 13 - - 
water (feet) 
Character of foundation Limestone Limestone Limestone Rock Rock 
Kind of spillway Fixed-gated Fixed-gated Gated Gated Fixed 
Height of dam (feet) 67 72 114 95 192 
Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Earth 
and Earth and Earth and Earth 
Total reservoir capacity 367,300 18,180 934,400 604,500 2,554,000 
(acre-feet) 
Power-development 30,000 - 130,000 73,375 86,000 
(kilowatts) 
Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 
Year opened to navigation 1954 1962 1963 - - 
Cost to date: 3 $47,978,858 $13,038,427 $98,948,6694 $131,565,760 $53,030,038 
1. Above mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). 
2. Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). 
3. Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown in Table 
10-A. 
4. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge and $10,617,080 
for major rehabilitation. 
10-53

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 10-N BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL 
(See Section 8 of Text) 
Armistead William John Hollis 
Coffeeville Demopolis Selden Bacon Oliver Holt Bankhead 
Lock Lock Lock Lock & Dam Lock Lock 
and Dam and Dam and Dam (Replacement) and Dam and Dam' 
Miles above Mobile2 116.7 213.2 261.1I 337.7 347.0 365.5 
Nearest town (Alabama) Coffeeville Demopolis Eutaw Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa 
Distance (miles) 3 (within city) 6 15 (within city) 6 30 
Lock:
Grestest length available 
for full width (feet) 600 600 600 600 600 600 
Width of chamber (feet) 110 110 110 110 110 110 
Maximum lift (feet) 34 40 22 28 64 68 
Depth over sills at low 
water (feet) 13.0 13.0 13.2 18.0 13.0 14.0 
Character of foundation Rock Rock Sand, clay Hard shale Shale, Sandstone 
sandstone 
Kind of spillway Fixed-Gated Fixed Gated Fixed Gated Gated 
Type of construction 
Lock Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete 
Dam Concrete Concrete Earth-Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete 
Year completed 1965 1962 1962 1934 1969 1985 
Year opened to navigation 1960 1954 1957 1991 1966 1975 
Actual cost of lock and dam3 $21,597,264 $19,774,583 $13,295,553 $122,164,374 $28,100,000 $52,292,880 
I. Single lift lock. 
2. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, Ala. 
3. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. 
4. Scheduled. 
10-54

MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 10-0 
TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI 
(See Section 21 of Text) 
Existing Projects 
Gainesville Aliceville Columbus Aberdeen Lock A Lock B Lock C Lock D Lock E 
Lock Lock Lock Lock and and and and and 
and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway a 
Miles above mouth' 266 307 335 358 371 376 39 398 407 
Nearest town Gainesville, AL Aliceville, AL Columbus, MS Aberdeen, MS Amory, MS Smithville, MS Fulton, MS Fulton, MS Belmont, MS 
Greatest lock length 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 
available for full 
width (feet) 
Width of Chamber (feet) 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 
Maximum lift (feet) 36 27 27 27 30 25 25 30 30 
Elevation of normal 109 136 163 190 220 245 270 300 330 ( 
pool surface (msl) ( 
Depth over sills at 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 
low water (feet) 
Character of foundation Mooreville Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. 
Chalk Sand & Clay Sand & Clay Sand Lam. Sand Sand & Clay Clay Sand Clay 
Kind of spillway Fixed & Fixed & Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated 
Gated Gated 
Height of dam (feet) 56 57 57 57 46 48 53 52 44.5 
Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete 
& Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth 
Total reservoir capacity 45,290 655 59,483 31,564 4,400 19,000 13,300 24,900 6,900 ( 
(acre-feet) ( 
Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 
Yearopenedto 1978 1979 1981 1984 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 
navigation 
Estimated Cost $103,214,000 151,255,000 182,650,000 128,262,000 102,685,000 96,905,000 71,375,000 98,205,000 88,173,000 
Cost to Date $100,010,600 143,190,800 174,620,500 112,620,200 92,190,500 93,106,700 62,197,000 89,610,800 76,917,700 
1. Miles above Mobile, Alabama (Mile 0.00 is at Bankhead Tunnel on U.S. Highway 90). 
Bay Springs 
Lock 
and Dam 
412 
Tupelo, MS 
600 
110 
84 
(Summer) 414 
Winter) 409 
18 
Sandstone 
and Shale 
N/A 
103 
Concrete 
& Earth 
Summer) 180,000 
Winter) 143,000 
100 
1985 
147,000,000 
130,398,000 
10-55

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 10-P COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD 
HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1985 THRU FY 1995' 
Date Federal 
Study Requesting Agency Completed Cost 
Flood Insurance Studies 
Floyd County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Dec 84 $230,000 
Columbus, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 85 36,000 
Lowndes County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 85 229,000 
Aberdeen, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 85 35,000 
Amory, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 85 50,000 
Cherokee County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) July 85 168,000 
Monroe County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Oct 85 140,000 
Dale County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Dec 86 82,000 
Lauderdale County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mar 87 144,000 
Houston County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 87 114,000 
St. Clair County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 87 43,000 
Marengo County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 87 36,000 
Greene County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mar 88 18,550 
Covington County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 88 35,000 
Pickens County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 88 50,000 
Fulton County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 88 180,000 
Monroe County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 88 33,000 
Colquitt County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 88 48,000 
Murray County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 88 68,000 
Coffee County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 89 48,500 
Montgomery County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jul 89 175,000 
Clayton County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 89 250,000 
Jefferson County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 91 397,000 
Calhoun County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 91 200,000 
Fayette County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 93 264,000 
Tupelo, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 94 157,965 
Mobile, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 94 254,531 
Special Flood Hazard Information 
Percosin Creek & Tribs., GA City of Albany, GA Nov 84 $14,000 
Coosawattee, Ellijay and Cartecay City of Ellijay, GA Jul 86 22,000 
Rivers, Vicinity of Ellijay, GA 
Rocky Creek and Basie Branch, MS Ellisville, MS Jan 87 19,000 
Springers Branch, MS Starkville, MS May 87 13,000 
Dixie Creek, GA La Grange, GA Jun 87 15,000 
Little Scooba Creek, MS Scooba, MS Jun 87 18,000 
Fishpond Drain & Trib., GA Donalsonville, GA Dec 87 18,000 
Dearmenville & Golden Springs, AL Anniston, AL Mar 88 9,000 
Chickasawhay River, MS Quitman, MS Jun 89 19,000 
Archusa Creek, MS Quitman, MS Jun 89 9,000 
Leaf River, MS New Augusta, MS Sep 89 27,000 
Shades Creek, AL Jefferson County, AL Sep 90 45,000 
Turkey Creek, AL Jefferson County, AL Sep 91 7,000 
Leaf River, MS Taylorsville, MS Sep 91 25,000 
Oostanaula River, GA City of Rome, GA Jan 92 10,000 
Coosa River, GA City of Rome, GA Jul 92 10,000 
Big Wills Creek, AL Fort Payne, AL Aug 93 41,800 
Dry Creek, AL Oneonta, AL Dec 93 25,000 
Big Wills Creek, AL Valley Head, AL Nov 93 34,800 
Coosa River, AL Wilsonville, AL May 95 35,000 
Choctawhatchee River, FL Holmes County, FL Aug 95 3,000 
1. For list of reports completed by Mobile District for FY 1965 thru FY 1974, see FY 1974 Annual Report, page 10-50; reports completed in FY 
1975 see FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-44; and for reports completed in FY 1976 and FY 1977, see FY 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. See page 
10-48 FY 1978 Annual Report for FY 1978 reports, and see page 10-43 FY 1984 Annual Report for FY 1979 through FY 1984 reports. 
10-56

NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT *
District comprises a portion of Louisiana, 
embraced in drainage basins tributary to Mississippi 
River and Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River 
above mile 325.5 above Head of Passes (AHP), drainage 
area of Ouachita-Black River Basin, and small 
eastern and western portions of Louisiana tributary 
to Pearl River and Sabine River and Lake. The New 
Orleans District territory encompasses 30,000 
square miles. 
It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth 
of Pearl River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the 
Mississippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood 
control work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 
AHP to Gulf of Mexico; Atchafalaya River; and in 
Atchafalaya Basin; and maintenance of project navigation 
channel of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 
AHP, under supervision of President, Mississippi 
River Commission (MRC), and Division Engineer, 
Lower Mississippi Valley Division. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Page Flood Control (cont.) 
Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA...... 11-2 
Mississippi River Ship Channel, 
Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA ............. 11-2 
North-Pass-Pass Manchac, LA ........ 11-3 
Navigation work under 
special authorization ................ 11-3 
Flood Control 
5. Comite River, LA (Diversion).......... 11-3 
6. Grand Isle and vicinity, LA ........... 11-4 
7. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, 
LA, (hurricane protection)............ 11-5 
8. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA 
(hurricane protection)................ 11-5 
9. Mermentau River, Grand Chenier, LA.. 11-6 
10. New Orleans to Venice, LA 
(hurricane protection)................ 11-6 
11. Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA 
(hurricane protection)................ 11-7 
Page 
12. Inspection of completed flood 
control projects ..................... 11-7 
13. Flood control work under special 
authorization................. ..... 11-7 
14. Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, 
and Restoration Act ................ 11-7 
15. Environmental Work Under Special 
Authorization ...................... 11-8 
Tables 
Table 11-A 
Table 11-B 
Table 11-C 
Table 11-D 
Table 11-E 
Table 11-F 
Cost and Financial 
Statement................. 11-9 
Authorizing Legislation .... 11-11 
Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects.................. 11-15 
Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects .......... 11-17 
Deauthorized Projects ...... 11-18 
Active General 
Investigations ............ 11-19 
11-1 
Navigation 
1. 
2. 
3. 
4.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
1. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, 
LA 
Location. In State of Louisiana and the territorial 
waters of the United States and extends from 
existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 
7,500 feet north of existing IHNC lock and about 
11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning 
basin south of Michoud, LA, and then as a land and 
water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, LA, 
southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake 
Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur 
Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. 
(Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340, 11360, 
11363, 11369, 11371, and 11373. Also see MRC 1989 
(57th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, 
IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA.) 
Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 
36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and 
water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along 
south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur 
Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually 
to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective 
jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike 
through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along 
islands as required. It also provides for an inner 
tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000-foot 
turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway 
canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet 
wide extending easterly along Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway from turning basin, including construction 
of a suitable highway bridge with approaches to 
carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over 
channel. Plan further provides for future construction 
of a channel and lock in the vicinity of the existing 
lock to furnish an additional connection between 
tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. Estimated 
cost for new work (October 1993) is $584,000,000 
Federal and $333,000,000 non-Federal. This does 
not include modification for Mississippi River-Gulf 
Outlet, Michoud Canal, which is reported separately. 
The Federal cost excludes $45,000 for aids to 
navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. 
Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation 
are fully described on page 11-4 of FY 1986 
Annual Report. 
Terminal facilities. A public facility on the 
waterway is the Public Bulk Terminal of New 
Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, 
Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at 
Mile 63. Two container ship berths are in operation 
at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work by hired labor: Engineering and economic 
studies were completed for the new lock and connecting 
channels feature. Plans and specifications 
for foreshore protection along the south bank of the 
MRGO from Bayou Bienvenue to the intersection of 
the MRGO and GIWW were completed. 
Two dredging contracts for removal of 6,198,000 
cubic yards of material from the channel at a cost of 
$4,568,000 were awarded in FY 95, and one contract 
to maintain rock foreshore protection at a cost of 
$1,038,500, and one contract to repair the south jetties 
at a cost of $3,590,000. The Government hopper 
dredge McFarland also excavated 1,564,800 cu. yds. 
at a cost of $2,296,000. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was 
initiated March 1958. The channel unit is 90 percent 
complete and the shiplock unit is 0 percent complete. 
The total project is 75 percent complete. The 
channel was opened to navigation Jul. 25, 1963, and 
completed Jan. 20, 1968. Paris Road Bridge was 
opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 
1967. Approximately 3 miles of first- and second-lift 
stone jetties have been constructed on north side of 
channel and approximately 8.27 miles of first-lift 
and 7.34 miles of second-lift stone jetties have been 
constructed on south side of channel in Breton 
Sound. The foreshore protection, south bank, Chalmette 
Area, Station 367+00 to Station 1007+00 is 
complete. Principal work required to complete the 
new lock, raising and extending jetties as required 
and foreshore protection. Inner Harbor Navigation 
Canal to the intersection of the MRGO and GIWW is 
in a deferred status. The portion between station 
342+00 and Station 368+00 is scheduled for a Dec. 
95 award. The site for the lock remained the major 
problem. The Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 authorized the Corps to look at both the IHNC 
and the Violet site. The Corps established an Open 
Planning Process working directly with the local 
affected people at the IHNC site. The aim was to 
develop a comprehensive solution that will benefit 
both the neighborhoods and navigation interests. A 
Site in the Industrial Canal between Claiborne and 
Florida Avenues, north of the existing lock, has been 
tentatively identified as the location that could be 
the only "win-win" solution. All studies were focused 
on this site. The tentatively selected plan is a 36 ft. 
deep by 110 ft. wide by 1200 ft. long deep draft lock. 
An Evaluation Report is scheduled for completion in 
FY 1996. A draft report was submitted for review in 
Sep. 95. 
2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP 
CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON 
ROUGE, LA 
Location. The project is located in the southeastern 
portion of Louisiana below Baton Rouge, and 
consists of the Mississippi River and its major outlet 
to the Gulf of Mexico, Southwest Pass. 
Existing project. Provides more efficient deepdraft 
navigation access to the New Orleans and 
Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via 
Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to 
a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent 
channel along the left descending bank in New 
11-2

NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 
Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin 
at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to 
reduce maintenance. 
Estimated cost of existing project (Oct. 1, 1994) is 
$161,000,000 Federal and $390,000,000 non- 
Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation 
aids at an estimated cost of $1,200,000. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described 
in full on pages 11-2 and 11-3 of the FY 92 Annual 
Report. 
A third supplement to the LCA addressing the 
Permanent Saltwater Intrusion Mitigation Plan was 
executed on May 28, 1993. 
A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between 
the Government and the State of Louisiana was executed 
on Sep. 3, 1993 which provides for the dredging 
of a 45-foot channel from Mile 181 AHP to Baton 
Rouge. 
Terminal facilities. See Mississippi River, 
Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Construction is underway on the permanent mitigation 
plan. The permanent mitigation plan consists of 
the Government constructing an underwater sill, 
when needed, at Mile 64 AHP to prevent the intrusion 
of saltwater into water supplies of the metropolitan 
New Orleans area. The plan also provides for 
upgrading the Plaquemines Parish water distribution 
system to provide fresh water to water treatment 
plants impacted by increased saltwater intrusion 
caused by the deeper channel. The first three 
contracts for the improvement of Plaquemines Parish 
water distribution system have been completed 
and two others are underway. A supplemental LCA 
for this work was executed on May 28, 1993. 
We have initiated work on the General Design 
Memorandum for the remaining authorized features 
of the project. This includes the deepening of the 
Mississippi River to 55 feet from the Gulf of Mexico 
to Baton Rouge. Construction of the 45-foot channel 
between mile 181 AHP and Baton Rouge began on 
Aug. 1, 1994, and was completed on December 10, 
1994. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. The 45-foot channel is 
completed from the Gulf to Baton Rouge. Construction 
of the permanent mitatigation plan is underway. 
Work on the General Design Memorandum for the 
remaining authorized features is underway. 
3. NORTH PASS-PASS MANCHAC, LA 
Location. The project is located in Tangipahoa 
and St. John the Baptist Parishes in southeastern 
Louisiana, in the south entrance channel of Pass 
Manchac along the western shore of Lake 
Pontchartrain. 
Existing project. The project will alleviate the 
occasional shallow water conditions in the south 
entrance channel which hinders tow operators in 
their efforts to efficiently move cargo into and out of 
Port Manchac. This condition was of sufficient magnitude 
to force operators to either light-load barges, 
or wait for sufficient depth to allow passage. The 
authorized project consists of dredging the south 
entrance channel to dimensions of -9 feet NGVD by 
130 feet with 2 feet of advanced maintenance (-11 
feet NGVD) for a distance of approximately 7,000 
feet. The dredged material was placed along the 
western shore of Lake Pontchartrain to slow erosion 
in this area. Total cost at this time is $420,052. 
Local Cooperation. Local cooperation for this 
project is being supplied in accordance with the provisions 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986. This act requires that the local interest shall: 
(a) Provide to the Government all lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, 
and perform the necessary relocations required for 
construction, operation and maintenance of the project 
(Current estimate is $0); (b) Bear 20 of the first 
cost of the project (10 percent up front, 10 percent 
after completion, or repaid over 30 years). The South 
Tangipahoa Parish Port Commission has signed the 
Project Cooperation Agreement and is the local 
sponsor for this project. 
Operations and results during the fiscal 
year. In FY 95 construction was initiated and completed 
on this project. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. The project was 
accepted on Aug. 29, 1995 as of May 29, 1995. The 
final audit is the only remaining work on this 
project. 
4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public 
Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). 
Preauthorization studies costs for FY 95 were 
Vermilion River, LA, $25,020; Bayou Teche above 
Mile 50 for $399; GIWW Alternate Route at Bayou 
Sorrel Lock, LA, for $5,661; the Port of Iberia for 
$4,917; Taylor Point Cut for $5,385. Preconstruction 
Engineering and design work costs for 
the Bayou Dularge, LA, project were $19,086. 
Flood Control 
5. COMITE RIVER (DIVERSION), LA 
Location. In East Baton Rouge Parish, LA, 
between the Comite River and the Profit Island 
Chute of the Mississippi River, north of the town of 
Baker, LA, and south of the town of Zachary, LA. 
11-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Existing project. The project will provide protection 
for residents of the Comite River Basin by 
reducing stages in the river below the diversion 
point for events up to the 100-year flood event,and 
containing within banks events up to the 10-year 
flood event. The authorized project consists of construction 
of an eight-mile diversion channel from the 
Comite River to an outfall into Lilly Bayou, and then 
a four-mile diversion along Lilly and Cooper Bayous 
to the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River. 
The project also includes a stage control structure in 
the Comite River at the diversion point, a diversion 
structure in the new channel near the diversion 
point, a stage control structure and an outfall structure 
near and at the outfall into Lilly Bayou, and 
four control structures at the intersections of 
Whites, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous, the 
fourth near McHugh Road. A levee will be constructed 
of disposed material on the lower south 
bank of the new channel to assure against induced 
flooding on the south side, and a bike path for recreation 
is planned on the north side of the channel 
from U.S. Highway 67 to just west of LA State Highway 
19 (about 3.25 miles). Mitigation for the project 
includes the planting of trees on cleared land near 
the diversion point and on portions of the disposal 
area, the protection and management of existing forested 
lands near the diversion point, and the acquisition 
of lands in an oxbow area of the Amite River 
between Denham Springs, LA and Port Vincent, LA, 
with construction of a weir to retain water on this 
land. Upgrading two gauging stations and installing 
six new gauging stations to assist in flood prediction 
is also included in the project. The current approved 
cost of the project is $87,600,000, including 
$43,800,000 Federal cost and $43,800,000 non- 
Federal cost. 
Local Cooperation. The cost sharing provisions 
contained in the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 require that local interests shall: (a) Provide 
to the Federal Government all lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, 
and perform the necessary relocations required for 
construction, operation, and maintenance of the 
project (Current estimate is $39,265,000); (b) Bear 
50 percent of the first cost of recreation (Current 
estimate is $175,000); and (c) Provide to the Federal 
Government a cash contribution equal to 5 percent 
of the total cost of the project, excluding recreation 
(Current estimate is $4,360,000);. The total cost of 
items (a), (c) and (d) mentioned above is limited to 
50 percent of the total cost of the project. Upon completion 
of the Feasibility Study, the Louisiana 
Department of Transportation and Development 
signed a letter of intent to sponsor the project. 
Operations and results during the fiscal 
year. In FY 95 Preconstruction Engineering and 
Design (PED) efforts continued on the Design 
Memorandum, which was submitted on Aug. 15, 
1995. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Significant design 
changes have occurred as a result of field investigations 
and the hydraulic modeling done at WES. The 
draft Design Memorandum incorporating those 
changes was submitted on Aug. 15, 1995. 
Flood Control 
6. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA 
Location. In south Jefferson Parish, LA, along 
the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New 
Orleans and 45 miles northwest of Southwest Pass 
(Mississippi River). 
Existing project. The project provides protection 
from waves driven by hurricanes that have a 
frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 
years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated 
dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore 
and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island 
at Caminada Pass. The dune has a 10-foot-wide 
crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet NGVD, 1 on 5 side 
slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm 
slopes from an elevation of 8.5 feet NGVD at the toe 
of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 
feet NGVD and, from this point, assumes its natural 
slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by 
the plan has a top width of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 
feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side slopes, and extends 
approximately 3,600 feet along the western end of 
the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of project 
(October 1991) is $20,933,000 Federal and 
$12,567,000 non-Federal, including $7,157,484 contributed 
funds. The repair and restoration of Grand 
Isle were accomplished by two separate contracts. 
The jetty extensions and sand bar removal contract 
(partial fix), was completed in early 1988. The dune 
repair and structural reinforcement contract was 
physically completed Sep. 4, 1991. An O&M Manual 
has been approved. The project has been turned over 
to the State of Louisiana for operation and 
maintenance. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are 
described in full on page 11-4 of the FY 92 Annual 
Report. An additional $4,750,000 was deposited in 
escrow to complete restoration of the dune which 
was completed on Sep. 4, 1991. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Two contracts were 
awarded to repair damages caused by Hurricane 
Andrew. The first contract to restore the beach and 
dune was completed in March 1994. The second contract 
which involved construction of 23 offshore 
breakwaters to reinforce the project at critical locations 
was completed on Apr. 25, 1995. 
11-4

NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 
7. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND 
VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE 
PROTECTION) 
Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of 
New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson, Orleans, St. 
Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising 
lower land and water area between Mississippi 
River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment 
to north and west. The dominant topographic feature 
is Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow tidal basin, 
about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 
feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to 
the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi 
Sound to the Gulf to the east. The lake drains about 
4,700 square miles of tributary area. (Refer to Geological 
Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and 
Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake 
Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake 
Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles 
Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield, Denham 
Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet 
Carre', Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. 
Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast 
and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116. 
Existing project. Provides protection to the 
greater New Orleans area and other communities 
bordering Lake Pontchartrain from the effects of 
hurricane-generated floods. The project is comprised 
of two major features: The Chalmette Area Plan 
and the High Level Plan. The Chalmette Area Plan 
consists of a levee and floodwall system around the 
Chalmette area and along the Mississippi River-Gulf 
Outlet, with connections to the Mississippi River 
levees. The High Level Plan provides for heightening 
and strengthening the existing hurricane protection 
levee systems in Orleans Parish and the east 
bank of Jefferson Parish, repairing and rehabilitating 
the Mandeville Seawall in St. Tammany Parish; 
building a new mainline hurricane levee on the east 
bank of the St. Charles Parish just north of U.S. 
Highway 61 (Airline Highway); raising and 
strengthening the existing levee which extends 
along the Jefferson-St. Charles Parish boundary 
between Lake Pontchartrain and Airline Highway; 
and deferring construction of the proposed Seabrook 
lock until its feasibility as a feature of the Mississippi 
River-Gulf Outlet navigation project can be 
determined. Areas which will be enclosed by the 
levee and floodwall construction will be provided 
protection against tidal surge resulting from the 
Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The estimated 
project cost for work (October 1995) is $504,000,000 
Federal and $203,000,000 non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described 
in full on page 11-5 of the FY 92 Annual Report. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Preparation of design memorandums and plans and 
specifications continued by hired labor, Architect- 
Engineer Contractors, and the local sponsors. 
A change from the original Barrier Plan to the 
current high level plan was approved in February 
1985 by the Office, Chief of Engineers. 
A draft mitigation report with corresponding EIS 
was prepared and distributed for public review on 
Mar. 16, 1988, and subsequently approved. The 
Louisiana Department of Natural Resources has 
agreed to fund the Local Sponsor's share of mitigation. 
Construction will start in February 1996. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started 
May 1967 and is 85 percent complete. 
In FY 96, we will initiate award of five construction 
contracts, continue four ongoing construction 
contracts, complete four construction contracts and 
initiate and complete four construction contracts. In 
FY 97, we will initiate award for five construction 
contracts, continue two ongoing contracts and initiate 
and complete five construction contracts. 
8. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA 
(HURRICANE PROTECTION) 
Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along 
Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks 
of the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden 
Meadow. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles 
Cutoff, Lake Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow 
Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, 
Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet 
Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, 
Hahnville, Point a la Hache, Barataria, and Fort 
Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 
Nos. 1115 and 1116. 
Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 
40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche 
from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement 
of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden 
Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane 
protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower 
bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees 
to regulate intercepted drainage. Estimated 
cost for new work (October 1995) is $79,100,000 
Federal and $33,900,000 non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described 
in full on page 11-6 of the FY 92 Annual Report. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Construction contract work continued on two contracts 
in FY 95 and will be complete in FY 95. Three 
contracts are scheduled for award in FY 1996. Planning, 
engineering, and design activities will continue 
in FY 96 for future construction work. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction 
commenced in February 1972 and is 83 percent 
complete. 
11-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
9. MERMENTAU RIVER, GRAND 
CHENIER, LA 
Location. Along the right descending bank of 
the Mermentau River near the town of Grand 
Chenier, Sections 3 and 4, Township 15 South, 
Range 6 West, Cameron Parish, Louisiana. 
Existing project. The authorized project consists 
of construction of approximately 2,000 feet of 
rock dike parallel to Parish Road 218 about 15 feet 
riverside of the road centerline. Fill material would 
be placed between the existing roadway tow and the 
newly constructed dike to replace the eroded shoreline. 
Both fill and stone material would be imported 
to the site. 
Local Cooperation. Local cooperation for this 
project is being supplied in accordance with the provisions 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986. This act requires that the local interest shall: 
(a) Provide to the Government all lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, 
and perform the necessary relocations required for 
construction, operation and maintenance of the project 
(current estimate is $0); (b) Bear 25 of the first 
cost of the project (12.5 percent up front, 12.5 percent 
after completion, or repaid over 30 years). The 
Cameron Parish Police Jury has signed the Project 
Cooperation Agreement and is the local sponsor for 
this project. 
Operations and results during the fiscal 
year. In FY 95 construction was initiated on this 
project. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction is underway 
on this project. Estimated cost is currently 
$146,000. 
10. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, 
HURRICANE PROTECTION 
Location. Includes land subject to inundation by 
hurricane tides extending along both banks of the 
Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity 
of Phoenix to Venice, LA. 
Existing project. Provides for improvements 
along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for 
prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by 
increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying 
existing drainage facilities where necessary in 
three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank 
from St. Jude to Tropical Bend, 18 miles, 4,340 acres 
protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Tropical 
Bend to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and 
Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia 
16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and raising the river 
levee on the west bank (MR&T levee) from St. Jude 
to Venice, to a grade high enough to prevent overtopping 
by tidal surges from the east, generally 
called the West Bank River Plan. Reach B was later 
divided into two units, Reach B-1 from Tropical 
Bend to Fort Jackson and Reach B-2 from Fort Jackson 
to Venice, LA, as a result of a request made by 
the local agency. 
Estimated cost of new work (October 1995) is 
$166,000,000 Federal and $71,000,000 non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements, 
and rights-of-way including borrow areas 
and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction 
of the project, at costs presently estimated at 
$8,124,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and 
relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and 
other facilities required by the construction of the 
project at costs presently estimated at $6,200,000; 
bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently 
estimated at $71,000,000, and cash contribution or 
equivalent work presently estimated at $56,667,000 
to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of 
construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent 
work items. 
The local sponsor has requested that an area 
extending from the upstream limits of Reach A at 
City Price to St. Jude, Louisiana be incorporated 
into the project. This work involves upgrading 3.3 
miles of existing non-Federal levees to project standards. 
The local sponsor has elected to pay all of the 
costs of this reach of levee. While the sponsor will 
not receive credit for these costs, the increased protected 
area would be eligible for Federally subsidized 
flood insurance. Savings to the project 
achieved by a portion of levee no longer being 
required at the upstream end of Reach A, will be 
creditable to the local sponsor. A Post Authorization 
Change report was prepared for this reach and was 
approved by the Lower Mississippi Valley Division 
on Mar. 6, 1992. Supplemental assurances for the 
City Price to St. Jude reach were accepted on Feb. 
18, 1993. 
Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Government. 
Assurances for all reaches of the project have 
been furnished. 
Requirements are described in full on page 11-7 of 
the FY 92 Annual Report. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Construction during FY 95 was initiated on one 
contract and completed on two others. 
Work continued on the mitigation work required 
for the project. The mitigation plan developed for 
Reach B consists of the construction of five crevasses 
in the bank at Main Pass to promote marsh creation. 
One crevasse was constructed in 1986 and the four 
remaining crevasses were constructed in May 1995. 
A supplemental Mitigation Plan is being developed 
to readdress impacts on Reach A and also determine 
mitigation requirements for Reach C and the West 
Bank River levee. Approval of this supplemental 
plan is expected during 1995 and this remaining 
mitigation work is scheduled for construction in 
FY 96. 
11-6

NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on 
the project in September 1968 and the total project 
is approximately 70 percent complete. 
11. WESTWEGO TO HARVEY CANAL, 
LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) 
Location. The project includes the Urban area 
within Jefferson parish between Westwego and the 
Harvey Canal on the west bank of the Mississippi 
River in the vicinity of New Orleans, Louisiana. 
The project area is generally bounded by the 
Harvey Canal to the east, Lakes Cataouatche and 
Salvador to the west, the Mississippi River to the 
north, and Barataria Bay to the south. 
Existing project. The project will provide protection 
for the area between the City of Westwego 
and the Harvey Canal within Jefferson Parish, 
Louisiana, on the west bank of the Mississippi 
River. The plan of protection consists of about 22 
miles of floodwalls and new and enlarged levees 
designed to protect against tidal floodwaters resulting 
from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The 
SPH has a frequency of recurrence of once in about 
500 years. The elevation of the SPH floodwalls and 
levees varies from 9 feet NGVD to 17 feet NGVD. 
The project plan includes mitigation which consists 
of the construction of a timber pile and tire breakwater 
on the west bank of Lake Cataouatche adjacent 
to the Salvador Wildlife Management Area and the 
acquisition and management of 1,024 acres of 
wooded wetlands. 
The estimated project cost (October 1995) is 
$95,000,000 ($61,800,000 Federal and $33,200,000 
non-Federal). 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described 
in full on page 11-8 of the FY 92 Annual Report. 
(2) Accomplish all necessary alteration and relocations 
to roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, 
wharves, and other facilities required by the construction 
of the project. (The current estimate is 
$8,108,000.) 
(4) Bear 35 percent of the first cost of construction. 
(The current estimate is $33,200,000.) Funds 
provided by non-Federal interests for interim hurricane 
protection may be considered beneficial expenditures 
and may be credited as a part of the non- 
Federal contribution of the project pursuant to the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and subsequent 
policies. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
The following construction contracts were awarded: 
V-Levee Floodwall and Hwy. 45 levee closures (Dec 
94); Old to New Westwego Pumping Station Floodwall 
(Jul 95); and Estelle Pumping Station to LP&L 
Powerline First Lift Levee (Sep 95). 
Conditions as of Sep. 30. Project construction 
began in Feb 1991 and is 20 percent complete. Completion 
is scheduled in 2005. 
12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Various hurricane protection projects, as well as 
small flood control projects, were inspected during 
FY 1995. Also, periodic inspection and continuing 
evaluation of completed civil works structures was 
conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at 
various times during the year on an as needed basis. 
Fiscal year costs for the period were $274,532. 
Total costs to Sep. 30, 1995 were $4,449,757. 
13. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Emergency flood control activities-repair, 
flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 
99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) 
Disaster preparedness, fiscal year costs for the 
period were $251,759. 
Rehabilitation costs for FY 95 were $1,708,674 for 
Mandeville Seawall and $2,642,621 for Grand Isle 
and $300,000 for Wine Island. 
Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, 
Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended 
(preauthorization). 
Detailed studies cost for FY 95 were W14, Canal 
Basin, Slidell, LA, $14,584; W15, Canal Basin, 
Slidell, LA, $11,083; and Jean Lafitte, La (Fisher 
School Basin) $15,769. 
Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 14, 
Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended 
(preauthorization). 
Detailed studies costs for FY 95 were on Highway 
16, Tangipahoa, $706; Highway 3066, Iberville, 
$8,158; Bayou des Glaises, Moreauville, LA, $4,536. 
14. COASTAL WETLANDS PLANNING, 
PROTECTION AND RESTORATION 
ACT (TITLE III OF PUBLIC LAW 
101-646, DATED NOV. 29, 1990) 
Location. The coastal parishes of Louisiana. 
Authority. Activities were authorized by the 
Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration 
Act (CWPPRA) (Title III of Public Law 101-646, 
dated Nov. 29, 1990), which established the Louisiana 
Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration 
Task Force. The Task Force consists of the Secretary 
of the Army (chairman); the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency; the Governor of 
the State of Louisiana; the Secretary of the Interior; 
11-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
the Secretary of Agriculture; and the Secretary of 
Commerce. 
Local Cooperation. The conditions of local 
cooperation are established by this act. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. The first Priority Project 
List was submitted on Nov. 29, 1991. Eighteen 
projects were named on the list; four of these were 
deferred for future consideration. Funds in the 
amount of $37.5 million ($28.1 million Federal, $9.4 
million State) are available for construction of these 
projects. Engineering and design on several of the 
projects has been completed, and the Task Force has 
given final approval for construction of nine projects. 
Construction has been completed on the following 
projects: the Bayou La Branche Wetland Creation 
project, April 1994; Cameron Prairie Wildlife Refuge 
Bank Erosion Control, August 1994; and Vegetative 
Plantings, West Hackberry and Dewitt/Rollover, 
March 1994 and August 1994, respectively. 
The Task Force submitted the 2nd Priority Project 
List on Nov. 24, 1992. Nineteen projects were 
named, with four of the projects in a deferred status, 
to be constructed should one of the other projects 
prove to be not implementable within the five-year 
limit imposed by the CWPPRA. Funds in the 
amount of $37.6 million ($28.2 million Federal, $9.4 
million State) are available for construction of these 
projects. Engineering and design has begun on many 
of these projects, and preliminary construction 
schedules are presently being verified. 
The Task Force submitted the 3rd Priority Project 
List in December 1993. The list consists of 17 projects, 
plus two additional projects in a deferred 
status. The total fully funded cost of the 17 projects 
is $40,625,000; the deferred projects represent an 
additional $2,050,000 in fully funded cost. 
The Task Force submitted the 4th Priority Project 
List on Mar. 5, 1995. The list contains 17 projects, 
including four demonstration projects. The State of 
Louisiana has advised the Task Force that it is presently 
unable to cost share in more than $20 million 
worth of projects. The state has therefore selected 
six projects, in addition to the demonstration projects, 
which it is willing to support. Those are the 
only projects for which engineering and design funds 
will be released to the lead agencies. The total fully 
funded cost of the 17 projects is $47,651,000. 
In response to Section 303(b) of the CWPPRA, the 
Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Restoration Plan report 
was published in November 1993. Following public 
review of the final report, a Record of Decision was 
prepared, signed by the Task Force chairman, and 
submitted to HQUSACE for transmittal to the 
ASA(CW). The report is currently being reviewed by 
the Office of Management and Budget prior to transmittal 
to the Congress. 
The State of Louisiana has expressed its intention 
(by letter of Jan. 5, 1993) to develop a Conservation 
Plan in accordance with provisions of the CWPPRA. 
Once such a plan has been approved (by the Administrator 
of the EPA, the Director of the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, and the Secretary of the Army), the 
State's share in project construction will be reduced 
from 25 percent to 15 percent. A Memorandum of 
Agreement and grant application for the first of the 
Conservation Plan development is currently being 
reviewed by the participating agencies. 
The Task Force approved a planning budget of 
$2,672,000 for program management and preparation 
of the 5th Priority Project List. In addition, 
$1,007,000 and $920,000 were budgeted for the Barrier 
Shoreline Protection and the Mississippi River 
Sediment, Nutrient, and Freshwater Redistribution 
feasibility studies, respectively. 
15. ENVIRONMENTAL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Environmental Activities pursuant to Section 
204 of Public Law 580, 102nd Congress 
(pre-authorization). 
Preauthorization study costs for FY 95 were Mississippi 
River-Gulf Outlet, LA, at a cost of $2,519; 
Barataria Bay Waterway, Grand Terre Island, 
Jefferson Parish, LA, at a cost of $55,856; Brown 
Lake, Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, LA, at a 
cost of $57,551; Sabine National Wildlife Refuge, 
LA, at a cost of $41,696; and Houma Navigation 
Canal, Cat Island Pass, LA, at a cost of $42,971. 
11-8

NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Funds 
Section to Sep. 30, 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 1995 
1. Mississippi 
River-Gulf 
Outlet, LA 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
2. Mississippi 
River Ship 
Channel-Gulf 
to Baton Rouge 
(Contrib. Funds) 
3. North Pass 
Pass Manchac, 
LA 
(Contrib. Funds) 
5. Comite River, 
LA 
(Diversion) 
6. Grand Isle 
and Vicinity, 
LA 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
(Contrib. Funds) New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
7. Lake Pontchartrain 
and Vicinity, 
LA (Hurricane 
Protection) 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
1,619,000 2,600,000 2,100,000 1,000,000 
1,897,964 2,482,560 2,215,848 993,639 
13,269,000 11,079,000 12,023,000 8,911,000 
11,720,482 12,780,749 12,025,900 9,025,191 
101,696,200 
101,519,021 
181,765,476 
181,690,529 
-- -- -- -- 1,240,4771 
-- -- -- -- 1,196,4771 
61,000 1,285,000 8,563,000 1,130,000 22,677,000 
331,875 965,449 4,207,897 2,480,533 19,947,081 
275,000 80,000 1,000,000 535,000 
247,622 143,400 415,241 1,120,479 
4,772,000 
4,737,057 
-- 10,740,776 
-- 10,732,538 
1,182
0
00 
0 112,000 347,000 
952 111,502 343,100 
95,100 
77,517 
460,128 
455,554 
95,100 
77,517 
-- 900,000 1,355,641 1,190,000 3,445,641 
-- 726,962 1,405,498 1,078,838 3,211,298 
0 
319,518
0 
185,990 
0 
74,557
0 
-2,000 
0 
149,526 
0 18,708,500 
140,114 18,497,732 
0 
166 
9,852,000 19,160,000 28,619,000 13,300,000 
11,257,484 13,102,927 22,279,917 20,694,000 
7,157,484 
7,157,484 
316,149,000 
310,170,692 
1,200,000 1,214,537 2,179,000 2,200,000 10,514,337 
269,246 2,351,488 745,084 814,000 6,974,572 
11-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 11-A 
(Continued) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Funds 
Section to Sep. 30, 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 1995 
8. Larose to Golden 
Meadow, LA 
(Hurricane 
Protection) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
9. Mermentau River, 
Grand Chenier, 
LA 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
747,000 1,455,000 2,565,000 2,200,000 68,203,000 
1,102,724 1,299,629 2,302,671 2,577,891 68,127,915 
-- 500,000 129,000 
-- 500,000 129,000 
New Work (Fed) 
Approp. 
Cost 
20 
20 
170 
140 
629,000 
629,000 
190 
160 
New Work (Non-Fed) 
Approp. 
Cost 
10. New Orleans to 
Venice, LA 
(Hurricane 
Protection) 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
11. Westwego to 
Harvey Canal, 
LA (Hurricane 
Protection) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
14,006,000 2,842,000 1,062,000 1,135,000 134,370,000 
15,250,568 2,775,423 1,719,241 1,572,112 134,278,655 
2,791,000 3,009,000 
4,401,640 2,001,663 
0 
1,502,052 
175,000 13,974,197 
0 13,597,486 
723,000 2,961,000 6,264,000 3,693,000 20,117,000 
1,974,712 2,705,253 2,333,189 4,013,899 16,108,028 
1. Contributed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, for providing fill for future industrial sites 
adjacent to turning basin and for dredging cable and pipeline crossings. 
11-10 
00
55
0 
55
0

TABLE 11-B 
NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Water 
Resources 
Development 
Act, 1986 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Mar. 29, 1956 
Oct. 22, 1976 
Water 
Resources 
Development 
Act, 1986 
Approp. Act of 
1985, dated 
Jul. 2, 1986 
(PL 99-88) 
LAKE CHARLES, LA 
The project for deepening of the project for navigation, Lake 
Charles, Louisiana, to a depth of 45 feet, at a total cost 
of $1,070,000. 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF 
MEXICO, LA 
Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New 
Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass, and Southwest 
Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River from New 
Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, 
"Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," 
with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New 
Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 
1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet; 
Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar 
Channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South 
Pass Bar Channel, 30 by 600 feet. 
Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide 
from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission 
bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New 
Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet within presently 
authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New 
Orleans. 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA (See Sec. 1 of 
Text) 
Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from 
Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater 
harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 
36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 
500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and 
provides, when economically justified, for construction of a 
lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, LA. 
Amends above Act making the construction of bridge 
relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the 
the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet 
channel. 
The Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet feature is modified to 
provide that the replacement and expansion of the existing 
industrial canal lock and connecting channels or the 
construction of an additional lock and connecting channels 
shall be in the area of the existing lock or at the Violet 
site. 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO 
BATON ROUGE, LA (See Sec. 2 of Text) 
Will provide more efficient deep-draft navigation access to the 
New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi 
River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel 
to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent 
channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans 
Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, 
and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. 
Public Law 99-662, 
Nov. 17, 1986 
H. Doc. 215, 
76th Cong., 1st sess. 
S. Doc. 36, 
87th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 245, 
82d Cong., 1st sess. 
Sec. 186, Water 
Resources Development 
Act of 1976 
(PL 94-587) 2d sess. 
Public Law 99-662, 
Nov. 17, 1986 
H. Doc. 2577, 
99th Cong., 1st sess. 
11-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1996 
TABLE 11-B 
(Continued) 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Nov. 17, 1986 
(PL 99-662) 
Aug. 30, 1985 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Water 
Resources 
Development 
Act, 1986 
Water 
Resources 
Development 
Act, 1992 
Adopted by 
Committee 
Resolutions 
Sep. 23, 1976, 
and Oct. 1, 
19762 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Formalizes the cost sharing provisions of the project, permits Water Resources 
the State of Louisiana to enact user fees to defray their Development Act of 
portion of the project costs, and implements harbor 1986, 99th Cong., 
maintenance fees to help pay for the Federal cost of the 2d sess. 
project. It also provides an option to the local sponsor to 
defer their initial payment for one year following initiation 
of construction. In terms of channel depths up to 45 feet, 
the cost sharing requirements are 75 percent Federal and 
25 percent non-Federal for construction and 100 percent 
Federal for maintenance. For channels deeper than 45 feet, 
the cost sharing requirements are 50 percent Federal and 
50 percent non-Federal for both construction and 
maintenance. 
WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO 
BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, 
LA) 
Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Houma H. Doc. 206, 
through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand 72d Cong., 1st sess. 
Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16.3 miles. 
Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway to Houma navigation canal. 
BAYOU RIGOLETTE, LA 
A project to construct six additional floodgates at Bayou Public Law 99-662, 
Rigolette, LA, adjacent to the existing drainage structure, Nov. 17, 1986 
at a total cost of $2,300,000. 
COMITE RIVER, LA (Diversion) (See Sec. 4 of Text) 
Construct an eight-mile diversion channel from the Comite H. Doc. 419, 
River to an oiutfall into Lilly Bayou, and then a four-mile 84th Cong 
diversion along Lilly and Cooper Bayous to the Profit Island 
Chute of the Mississippi River. Also included is a stage 
control structure in the Comite River at the diversion point, 
a diversion structure in the new channel near the diversion 
point, a stage control structure and an outfall structure near 
and at the outfall into Lilly Bayou, and three control structures 
at the intersections of Whites, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous. 
GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA (See Sec. 5 of Text) 
To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and H. Doc. 639, 
vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf 94th Cong., 2d sess. 
shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island 
at Caminada Pass. 
LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA 
(HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 6 of Text) 
Control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent H. Doc. 231, 
units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the 89th Cong., 1st sess. 
Chalmette Area plan. 
11-12

TABLE 11-B 
(Continued) 
NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Section 107, 
Rivers and 
Harbors Act 
of 1960, as 
amended 
Water 
Resources 
Development 
Act, 1986 
Nov. 17, 1988 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Section 14, 
Flood Control 
Act of 1946 
Oct. 23, 1962 
NORTH PASS - PASS MANCHAC, LA (See Sec. 3 of Text) 
The Corps of Engineers may construct small river and harbor 
improvement projects not specifically authorized by Congress 
when they will result in substantial benefits to navigation. 
LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, NORTH SHORE, LA 
The project for navigation, Lake Pontchartrain North Shore, 
LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated February 14, 
1979, at a total cost of $1,310,000, with an estimated first 
Federal cost of $655,000 and an estimated first non-Federal 
cost of $655,000. 
LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE 
PROTECTION) (See Sec. 7 of Text) 
A loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou 
Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 
3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for 
navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at 
upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low 
interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven 
multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. 
MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA, HURRICANE 
PROTECTION 
Construction of new levees along Lake Palourde and Bayou 
Ramos, levee to tie-in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee and three 
gravity drainage structures in Morgan City unit and 
enlargement of bank levee, construction of new levee, and 
construction of one floodgate and five gravity drainage 
structures in Franklin and vicinity unit. The Franklin Area 
reparable element is currently under review for 
deauthorization in accordance with WRDA 1990. 
MERMENATU RIVER - GRAND CHENIER, LA 
(See Sec. 9 of Text) 
Construction of emergency bank-protection works to prevent 
flood damage to highways, bridge approaches and public works. 
NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE 
PROTECTION (See Sec. 8 of Text) 
Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, 
LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by 
increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying 
existing drainage facilities where necessary in five separate 
reaches. 
Public Law 86-645 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Public Law 99-662, 
Nov. 17, 1986, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 184, 
89th Cong., 1st sess.1 
H. Doc. 167, 
89th Cong., 1st sess. 
Public Law 526, 
79th Cong, 2d sess. 
Jul. 24, 1946 
H. Doc. 550, 
87th Cong., 2d sess. 
11-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 11-B 
(Continued) 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
WEST BANK HURRICANE PROTECTION LEVEE, 
JEFFERSON PARISH, LA, Westwego to Havery Canal 
(See Sec. 9 of Text) 
Water Structural and nonstructural measures to prevent flood Public Law 99-662, 
Resources damage to those areas identified in the Feb. 1984 draft Nov. 17, 1986 
Development Environmental Impact Statement for the West Bank 
Act, 1986 Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, LA, at a total 
cost of $61,500,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of 
$40,000,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of 
$21,500,000. Funds provided by non-Federal interest for 
interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial 
expenditures and may be credited as part of the non- 
Federal contribution of the project pursuant to Section 104 
of this Act. 
1. Contains latest published map. 
2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 
11-14

NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
Cost to Sep. 1996 
For Last Mo. and Yr. 
Full Report Operation Completed 
See Annual and Deauthorized 
Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified 
Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge1 
Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA 
Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA 
Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene 
Boeuf, and Black, LA 
Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf 
of Mexico, LA 
Barataria Bay Waterway, LA 
Bayou Bonfouca, LA 
Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and 
Lake Bisteneau, LA 3,4,'o 
Bayou Dupre, LA 
Bayou Lacombe, LA 
Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump 
Waterway, LA 
Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and 
Yscolskey, LA 
Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA 
Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA 
Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA 
Bayou Teche, LA 
Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, LA 
Bayou Terrebonne, LA3 ,7 
Bayou Vermilion, LA3 
Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA 
Calcasieu River and Pass, LA 
Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA8 
Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA 
Cascasieu River Salt Water 
Barrier, LA9 
Cane River, LA2 ,5 
Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA 
Cypress Bayou and Waterway between 
Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA10 
Freshwater Bayou, LA 
Grand Bayou Pass, LA 
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between 
Apalachee Bay, FL, & Mexican Border 
Houma Navigation Canal, LA 
Inland Waterway from Franklin 
to Mermentau River, LA1 ,'11 
Intracoastal Waterway from the 
Mississippi River to 
Bayou Teche, LA12 
Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA13 
Leland Bowman Lock, LA 
Little Caillou Bayou, LA 
Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, 
and Bay Des Cannes, LA 
Mermentau River, LA 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
1967 
1978 
1984 
1984 
1981 
1984 
1974 
1887 
1968 
1967 
1984 
1970 
1950 
1970 
1958 
1984 
1983 
1961 
1947 
1936 
1984 
1976 
1981 
1973 
1910 
1967 
1971 
1984 
1950 
1985 
1984 
1960 
1956 
1950 
1987 
1973 
1977 
1985 
$ -- 
28,234 
16,962,246 
69,087 
30,356,691 100,258,217 
501,963 
1,572,685 
30,997 
5,000 
38,915 
4,716 
1,624,424 
96,916 
33,410 
33,355 
238,828 
754,330 
2,891,822 
120,089 
34,900 
27,830,835 
1,015,81410 
5,856,200 
4,197,262 
2,500 
58,342 
202,817 
7,116,224 
7,676 
25,734,501 
320,758 
104,187 
119,191 
2,181,718 
223,616 
36,780 
28,315 
654,956 
8,570,779 
1,849,679 
251,691 
200,169 
37,169 
148,978,311 
2,000 
463,401 
452,611 
28,679,708 
14,48010 
1914 
Nov. 1963 
1931 
1939 
1938 
May 1956 
1915 
Mar. 1923 
Mar. 1957 
1916 
1896 
2 
Oct. 1968 
Apr. 1974 
Sep. 1978 
Jan. 1968 
1959 
Dec. 1914 
Aug. 1968 
1939 
63,284,470 481,565,440 
-- 28,265,097 
249,052 
32,200,010 
77,761 
5,197,97514 
4,672,579 
552,780 
11,699 
241,896 
751,485 
114,519 
33,059,985 
2 
Mar. 1985 
1929 
JJuul.l . 11959252 
11-15 
1928

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 11-C 
(Continued) 
OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
Cost to Sep. 1995 
For Last Mo. and Yr. 
Full Report Operation Completed 
See Annual and Deauthorized 
Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified 
Mississippi River Baton Rouge to 
Gulf of Mexico, LA -- 1991 84,568,12816 846,011,95617 -- 
Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, 
Michoud Canal, LA Complete 1976 2,499,555 911,252 Nov. 1974 
Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA Complete 1986 10,014,012 25,451,707 Complete 
Navigation work under special 
authorization (Calcasieu Pass 
channel in Old River Bend 
at Cameron, LA)15 -- 1957 -- 139,755 -- 
Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1950 79,845 124,681 1912 
Petite Anse, Tigre, and 
Carlin Bayous, LA Complete 1981 -- 1,453,172 Nov. 1980 
Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA 1984 -- 38,303,445 
Sulphur River, AR and TX2'5 -- 1919 45,989 -- -- 
Tangipahoa River, LA -- 1985 -- 1,461,201 -- 
Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, 
and Blood Rivers, LA3 Complete 1973 8,115 92,163 1921 
Waterway from White Lake to 
Pecan Island, LA" -- 1948 10,904 0,742 -- 
Waterway from Empire, 
LA, to Gulf of Mexico Complete 1981 1,068,142 1,593,610 Jun. 1950 
Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway 
to Bayou Dulac, LA Complete 1990 641,608 1,774,459 Aug. 1964 
1. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized under Truman-Hobbs Act. 
2. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. 
3. 
4. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
9. 
10. 
11. 
12. 
13. 
14. 
15. 
16. 
17. 
18. 
19. 
Includes previous project costs. 
No commerce reported. 
Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 
Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 providing for widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is inactive. 
By Public Law 88404, that portion of Bayou Terrebonne between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream and a 
line determined by prolonging and extending eastern right-of-way line of New Orleans Boulevard southerly to south bank 
of said stream was declared nonnavigable. 
Includes $66,000 contributed funds. 
Operation and maintenance of the structure reported under project "Calcasieu River and Pass, LA." 
Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 
Not completed; incorporated in navigation project "Mermentau River, LA." 
Not completed; superseded for most of it length by present 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which coincides 
with or parallels it. 
Maintenance project; no future work schedules. 
Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public Works funds) for new work on previous project. Includes $114,519 for 
maintenance of previous project. 
Work is under continuing authority. 
Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. 
Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). 
Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). 
Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. 
11-16

NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 
OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
TABLE 11-D 
Cost to Sep. 1995 
For Last 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual and Mo. and Yr. 
Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed 
Amite River and Tributaries, LA 1964 3,034,2551 -- Feb. 1964 
Bayou Choupique, LA2 1954 129,930 -- Mar. 1954 
Bayou Rapides, LA2 1952 95,179 -- Dec. 1951 
Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA 1979 1,018,005 -- -- 
Morgan City and Vicinity, LA 1992 1,975,628 -- -- 
1. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: 
Amite River and tributaries ..................... $ 430 
Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA .......... 425,209 
2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended) 
11-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 11-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last Full Date Federal Contributed 
Report See Annual and Funds Funds 
Project Report for Authority Expended Expended 
Baton Rouge Harbor 1946 Nov. 2, 1979 -- -- 
Segment Between Section 12, 
Mi 2.5 and 5.0 Public Law 93-251 
(WRDA 74) 
Bayou Grosse Tete, 1969 May 6, 1981 -- -- 
LA DAEN-CWP-A Letter 
Subj: Completed 
Action on 5th 
Deauthorization Rpt, 
dated Jun. 17, 1981 
Lake Borgne and 1942 Nov 1979 -- -- 
Chef Menteur 
Bulkheads and Jetties 
Vinton Waterway, LA 1950 Nov. 2, 1979 
Section 12, 
Public Law 93-251 
(WRDA of 1974) 
11-18

NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 11-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
(96X3121) 
Federal Cost Totals by 
Item and CWIS Number FY 96 Categories 
SURVEYS (Category 100) 
Navigation(110) 
Bayou Lafourche & Lafourche-Jump Waterway, LA-10009 $ 5,157 
Intracoastal Waterway Locks, LA-81289 328,354 
Lake Charles Ship Channel (By Pass and General Anchorage 
Area) LA-99298 172,896 
Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, St. Bernard Parish, LA 
(Bank Erosion)-10241 2,330 
508,737 
Flood Control Studies(120) 
Amite River & Tributaries, LA-50100 106,210 
Bayou Tigre, Erath, LA-13291 44,129 
Black Bayou, Diversion, LA-13290 178,425 
Jefferson Parish, LA-13236 752,070 
Lafayette Parish, LA Flood Control-13251 437,916 
Lake Dauterive/Lake Pausse Pt., LA-13292 39,623 
Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Land Loss & Marsh Creation-12348 -40,277 
Mermentau, Vermilion & Calcasieu Rivers & Bayou Teche, LA-34014 198 
Orleans Parish, LA-13237 294,905 
St. Tammary Parish, LA-13155 115,389 
West Bank of Mississippi River-Vicinity of New Orleans, LA-59360 16,459 
1,945,097 
Special Studies(140) 
Environmental Services Partnerships-14190 302,138 
302,138 
Miscellaneous Activities(170) 
Gulf of Mexico Program-17251 15,008 
Interagency Water Resources Development-14713 72,283 
National Estuary Program-53903 27,817 
National Marine Fisheries Service-53906 7,382 
North American Waterfowl Management-53904 5,380 
Special Investigations-17250 51,667 
179,538 
Planning Assistance to States(186) 
Baker Canal & Tributaries Erosion Study-22014 3,763 
Chitimacha Indian Tribe Hydrologic & Hydraulic-71501 19,512 
Design Multi-Use Transportation Corridor, Orleans Parish-2210 6,059 
E. Baton Rouge Parish Drainage Maintenance 
& Construction Program-22013 436 
E. Baton Rouge Parish Structural Acquisition 
& Relocation Study-22012 4,003 
Flood Warning/Preparation Regional Plan-022021 16,166 
Louisiana State Hazard Mitigation Plan-022019 8,386 
Marsh Restoration - Barataria Unit-022017 1,540 
Negotiation Funds-014800 18,500 
Planning Assistance to States, LA-014822 482 
Regional Flood Warning Preparedness Regulations-022023 5,701 
Stephenville Flood Warning/Flood Protection System-022022 38,721 
Tangipahoa Parish Digitized Mapping-022025 1,022 
124,291 
TOTAL (Category 100) $ 3,059,802 
11-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 11-F 
(Continued) 
ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
(96X3121) 
Federal Cost Totals by 
Item and CWIS Number FY 96 Categories 
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) 
Flood Plain Management Services(250) 
Flood Plain Management-82030 
Quick Responses-82045 
Flood Plain Management Services-82040 
Special Studies, Chitimach GIS Mapping, LA-083011 
South East Louisiana Hurricane Evacuation - 83001 
Special Studies Computer Automation of Flood 
Hazard Data - 83005 
Killian, LA-83008 
Special Studies - Breaux Bridge, LA-083009 
Southwest, LA. Hurrican Evacuation - 083010 
24,827 
7,969 
122,910 
11,255 
19,151 
3,000 
16,413 
48,925 
50,378 
304,828 
TOTAL (Category 200) 
PROJECTS NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION (Category 400) 
Navigation Projects (421) 
Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA-(421) 10009 
Flood Control Projects (450) 
West Bank, East of Harvey Canal, LA-059360 
TOTAL (Category 400) 
ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) 
Flood Control Projects (650) 
Comite River, LA-77059 
TOTAL (Category 600) 
$ 12,498 
$ 822,731 
$ 1,078,839 
GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
$ 1,078,839 
$5,266,200 
11-20 
$ 304,828

VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT *
This district comprises western and central 
Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northern Louisiana, 
and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, 
embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries 
of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to 
and including Buffalo River; Pearl River Basin in 
Mississippi; independent tributaries of the Gulf of 
Mexico south of the Buffalo River Basin to the 
Mississippi-Louisiana state line; western tributaries 
of Mississippi River between White and Atchafalaya 
Rivers including Arkansas River Basin below a point 
3 miles upstream from Pine Bluff and Arkansas 
River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton, AR; Ouachita 
and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana; and 
Red River in Louisiana and Arkansas to the Texas- 
Arkansas state line. The Vicksburg District territory 
encompasses 68,000 square miles. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation 
1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below 
Camden, AR ................ 
2. Red River emergency bank 
protection.................... 
3. Red River Waterway-Mississippi 
River to Shreveport, La ........ 
4. Navigation work under special 
authorization................. 
Page Flood Control (cont.) 
...... 12-2 
...... 12-2 
...... 12-2 
...... 12-3 
Flood Control 
5. Aloha Rigolette, LA ................. 12-3 
6. Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, 
AR and LA....................... . 12-4 
7. Canal 43, AR....................... 12-4 
8. Chauvin Bayou, LA ................. 12-5 
9. Ouachita River Levees, LA ........... 12-5 
10. Ouachita River and tributaries 
AR and LA......................... 12-5 
11. Pearl River Basin, MS and LA......... 12-6 
12. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany 
Parish, LA......................... 12-7 
13. Porter Bayou, MS ................... 12-7 
14. Red River below Denison Dam 
(Vicksburg Dist.).................... 12-7 
15. Red River below Denison Dam, levees 
and bank stabilization (Vicksburg 
District)........................... 12-8 
16. Inspection of completed Flood 
Control Projects .................... 12-8 
Page 
17. Flood control work under 
special authorization ............ 
18. Ecosystem Restoration Work Under 
Special Authorization............. 
Tables 
Table 12-A 
Table 12-B 
Table 12-C 
Table 12-D 
Table 12-E 
Table 12-F 
Table 12-G 
Table 12-H 
Table 12-I 
Table 12-J 
... 12-8 
... 12-8 
Cost and Financial 
Statement................. 12-9 
Authorizing Legislation .... 12-11 
Ouachita and Black Rivers, 
AR and LA (9-Foot Project), 
Locks and Dams........... 12-14 
Other Authorized Navigation 
Project................... 12-15 
Ouachita River and 
Tributaries-Existing 
Project.................. .12-17 
Red River Below Denison 
Dam (Vicksburg District) 
New Projects ............. 12-18 
Red River Below Denison 
Dam (Vicksburg District) 
Incorporated Projects ...... 12-19 
Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects ........... 12-20 
Deauthorized Projects ...... 12-22 
Active General 
Investigations ............ 12-23 
12-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Navigation 
1. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS 
BELOW CAMDEN, AR 
Location. Ouachita River rises in Polk County, 
AR, and flows southeasterly and southerly about 
600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and 
Little Rivers at Jonesville, LA, it is called Black 
River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the 
Mississippi River. 
Previous projects. See page 683 of Annual 
Report for 1962 for details. 
Existing project. See page 684 of Annual 
Report for 1962 for details of the old 6.5-foot navigation 
project. Modified project and project for 
Red River below Fulton, AR, provide for a channel 
.9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between 
Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black 
and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to 
Camden, AR. Authorized features for the modified 
project include four new locks and dams, in-river 
construction dredging to achieve a 9-foot navigation 
channel depth, and channel realignment. All 
4 locks and dams are complete and in operation 
and initial channel dredging is complete providing 
9-foot navigation depth. Remaining work consists 
of realignment of 25 restricted bendway sites 
between river miles 195 at Sterlington, LA, and 
river mile 335 at Camden, AR, on the Ouachita 
River. With these improvements in place the river 
system will be navigable by a four-barge tow (two 
abreast) to Crossett, AR, river mile 237, and a twobarge 
tow (abreast) to Camden, AR. Mitigation 
features include the 65,000-acre Felsenthal 
National Wildlife Refuge in Arkansas, the 18,000- 
acre D'Arbonne National Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana, 
a series of recreation facilities along the 
* waterway, and improvements to Catahoula Lake 
to preserve it for migratory waterfowl. Estimated 
total cost for the nine-foot navigation project is 
$279,754,000, which includes $262,000,000 Federal 
costs and $17,754,000 non-Federal costs. 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required 
to furnish the construction rights-of-way for the 
realignment work. Seven of the 25 sites are within 
the Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge and are 
already owned by the Federal Government. However, 
there have been no indications that the land 
for the remaining 18 sites will be forthcoming 
because of strong opposition to the realignment 
work by local environmental groups. The six 
remaining recreation facilities are unscheduled at 
this time due to the lack of required cost sharing 
agreements. 
Terminal facilities. Public loading docks are at 
Columbia, LA, and Camden and Crossett, AR. Privately 
owned docks and loading and unloading 
facilities are at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington, 
LA, and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, AR. Two 
grain-handling facilities and a petroleum-loading 
facility are in the vicinity of Jonesville, LA, a grainhandling 
facility is in the vicinity of Acme, LA, and a 
petroleum-loading facility is in the vicinity of 
Smackover, AR. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
In FY 95, maintenance dredging was performed 
from Camden, AR, to the mouth of the Black River 
by the contract Dredge Gopher. 790,000 cubic yards 
of material were moved from the navigation 
channel. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 92 percent 
complete and provides limited navigation as far 
north as Camden, AR. All four locks and dams associated 
with the project are complete and in operation. 
Design and construction of the remaining features 
is on hold pending a consensus between the 
states of Arkansas and Louisiana concerning the 
type of development desired or the additional studies 
needed to reach a decision. 
2. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK 
PROTECTION 
Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest 
Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and 
Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the 
head of the levee system above Index, AR. 
Existing project. Provides for realigning the 
banks by means of cutoffs and training works and 
for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, 
and other methods as emergency conditions may 
require in advance of developing the design for the 
entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost 
for this work (October 1995) is $114,800,000 Federal 
and $2,182,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution 
of $7,000. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For 
details see pages 11-19 to 11-20, Annual Report 
FY 80. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Work 
by hired labor consisted of preparing plans and 
specifications, surveys, and general engineering. 
Construction was continued on Finn Phase I Revetment 
and initiated on Mays Lake and Sulfur 
Revetment. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated 
in October 1972 and is 99 percent complete. 
3. RED RIVER WATERWAY-PROJECT 
Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA Reach 
Location. From east central to northwest 
Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the 
Mississippi River and Shreveport, LA. 
12-2

VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 
Existing project. Provide a navigation route 
from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old 
River via Old and Red River to Shreveport, LA, 
developing a channel approximately 236 miles long, 
9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development will 
include five locks and dams, realignment and contraction 
of the river as necessary to develop an efficient 
channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to 
hold the newly developed channel in position. 
Facilities to provide and acquisition of wildlife mitigation 
lands opportunities for recreation and for fish 
and wildlife development and acquisition of wildlife 
mitigation lands are an integral part of the project. 
Estimated cost for new work is $1,998,300,000 Federal 
and $111,046,000 non-Federal, including 
$63,609,000 contributed funds. The Federal cost 
includes $374,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. 
Coast Guard. 
Local cooperation. For details see page 11-21, 
Annual Report FY 80. 
The Red River Waterway Commission, governing 
body of the Red River Waterway District, executed 
an act of assurance for all project features in 
Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution 
dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were 
accepted for and on behalf of the United States on 
Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished 
amended assurances covering the provisions of 
Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 on May 
23, 1973, for the portion of the project within 
Louisiana. These were accepted for and on behalf 
of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. A Local 
Cooperation Agreement between the Department 
of the Army and the Red River Waterway Commission 
for the acquisition of mitigation lands in the 
vicinity of Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management 
Area was executed on Jun. 16, 1993. 
Terminal facilities. Local interests are to provide 
adequate terminal facilities along the waterway. 
The Corps entered into an agreement with the 
City of Alexandria, LA, whereby material excavated 
from the Philip Bayou Realignment could be used as 
fill for port construction at mile 109. Construction of 
the realignment and port fill are complete. Construction 
of the Caddo-Bossier port by local interests 
is underway. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
The following contracts were initiated in FY 95: 
L&A Bridge Trackwork, St. Maurice Capout, Kadish 
Capout, Piermont Closure Repair, Coushatta Boat 
Ramp, McDade, Elm Grove, Cecile, Moss and Curtis 
Capouts and Shreveport-Bossier Boat Ramp. 
The following contracts were completed in FY 95: 
Lamb Dikes, O&A Pineville Grading and Drainage, 
L&A Bridge Superstructure, L&D 3 Channel Repair, 
L&D 4 DIS ACS Ph I, USS Easteport IDIX, Central 
Maintenance Facility, O&D 4 Ph II, Piermont 
Capout, Piermont Closure Repair, Westdale Capout, 
L&D 4 UIS Dikes, L&D #5 DIS ACS, L&D 5 Ph II, 
Elm Grove Revetment, Moss Capout and Sunny 
Point Capout. 
The following contracts continued in FY 95: Central 
Maintenance Crane Barge and Eagle Bend 
Revetment. 
In addition, acquisition of mitigation lands in the 
Loggy Bayou area was continued. 
Maintenance dredging was performed along the 
entire length of the waterway by the Contract 
Dredge Butcher, during Fiscal Year 1995. 1,800,000 
cubic yards of material were removed from the navigation 
channel. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated 
in July 1973, and project is 92 percent 
complete. 
A Reconnaissance Study was initiated in FY 95 to 
determine the feasibility of extending navigation on 
the Red River from the vicinity of Shreveport, LA to 
the vicinity of Index, AR, or to any justifiable 
interim point. The study is scheduled for completion 
in November 1995. 
4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, 
Public Law 87-645, as amended. 
No activity for FY 94. 
Flood Control 
5. Aloha-Rigolette Area, LA 
Location. The project is located in north-central 
Louisiana between the towns of Winnfield and 
Pineville on the left descending bank of the Red 
River. 
Authorized Project. The recommended plan 
consists of a three-barrel floodgate structure 
installed at the mouth of Bayou Darrow to reopen it 
to the Red River, 8.2 miles of clearing and snagging 
on Bayou Darrow from its mouth upstream to Bayou 
Rigolette, construction of a closure and low-flow 
structure on Bayou Rigolette just below its junction 
with Bayou Darrow, and realignment of Sam's 
Bayou and appropriate mitigation features. 
Local Cooperation. The City of Colfax, LA, has 
agreed to cost share this project. The Project Cooperation 
Agreement was signed on Sept. 19, 1994. 
Operations And Results During Fiscal Year. 
Right-of-way acquired for first item of work. Completed 
work on plans and specification for the second 
item of work. Continued work on plans and specifications 
for Items 3 and 4. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Design work is 
continuing. 
12-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
6. BAYOU BODCAU AND 
TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA 
Location. In east bank flood plain of Red River. 
Bayou Bodcau rises in vicinity of Hope, AR, and 
flows southerly through Bayou Bodcau Reservoir 
and Bodcau Lake to join Cypress Bayou and form 
Red Chute Bayou, continues through Red Chute 
Bayou, Flat River, and Loggy Bayou to Red River, 
about 40 miles below Shreveport, LA. 
Authorized project. Cypress Bayou-Red Chute 
Bayou levee: Extend existing levee from about 8 
miles southeast of Benton, LA, proceeding southerly 
to junction of Cross and Red Chute Bayous, and 
then parallel to Red Chute Bayou on the right 
descending bank to its junction with Cutoff Bayou 
for a total distance of approximately 25 miles; construct 
landside drainage channel and several culverts 
with flap gates to Red Chute Bayou; construct 
approximately 5 miles of levee on left descending 
bank of Red Chute Bayou extending south from 
Louisiana Highway 612, and relocate utility lines as 
needed. 
Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee: Extend from lower 
end of existing Red River levee in vicinity of Ninock, 
LA, along high (left descending) bank of Red River to 
a point on right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, 
about 1 mile above its mouth, thence generally along 
right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, Red Chute, 
Cutoff Bayou, and Flat River to Taylortown to tie 
into existing Red River levee; close Flat River near 
its junction with Cutoff Bayou and install one 36- 
inch round corrugated metal pipe with automatic 
flap gate to drain isolated pockets and provide uninterrupted 
drainage; construct drainage structures on 
Flat River near its junction with Red Chute Bayou 
and along alignment of the Loggy Bayou in the 
vicinity of Grassy Lake; and make necessary utility 
relocations. 
Flat River channel improvement: Enlarge to 
average bottom width of 50 feet with flat side slopes 
and deepen by 2 to 6 feet from the confluence with 
Cutoff Bayou to junction with Cooper Bayou, 11.6 
miles, including required relocations and modifications 
of utilities. 
The subject project was one of the Water 
Resources projects reviewed in March 1977 in 
accordance with the President request. As a result 
of this review, the President recommended that project 
construction be halted and the project be 
deauthorized. Congress subsequently directed the 
Corps to take the following two actions: Construct 
levees on Red Chute Bayou below Cutoff Bayou that 
are required to prevent induced flood damage that 
would otherwise result from the abandonment of 
partly completed project. Initiate studies to determine 
if modifications to the authorized project would 
permit its completion in a form consistent with the 
current executive policy. 
Engineering and design work for the induced 
flood prevention plan below Cutoff Bayou and project 
modification studies were being conducted when 
President Reagan signed, on Dec. 4, 1981, the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill 
of 1982, which contained language that "reconfirmed 
without further study and analysis" the plan for 
flood control for the project as approved by the Flood 
Control Act of 1965. 
Resumption of construction was scheduled to 
begin in 1984. The project sponsor, however, 
requested that construction be delayed while a 
reevaluation of the project was made. 
The reevaluation study has been completed. A 
summary of study results was submitted in January 
1987 which recommended no further Federal action. 
The Lower Mississippi Valley Division approved the 
report and a notice of study termination was disseminated 
in June 1987. 
Local cooperation. For details see pages 11-24 
and 11-25, Annual Report for FY 80. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Red Chute Bayou Levee crevassed during the May- 
June 1991 flooding and was repaired under contract 
with PL 84-99 funding. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated 
in October 1974 and is 17 percent complete. 
Reconnaissance Studies of Flood Control Alternatives 
along Red Chute Bayou were initiated in 
November 1991, as part of the Bossier Parish, LA, 
study. Reconnaissance phase studies, completed in 
May 1993, recommended that the study effort not 
progress into the feasibility phase since none of the 
alternative plans were found to be economically justified. 
No further investigations are planned at this 
time. 
7. CANAL 43, AR 
Location. Canal 43 drains into Lake Chicot and 
is located in Lincoln and Desha Counties, AR. 
Existing project. The plan of improvement provides 
for enlarging the channel beginning approximately 
1500 feet downstream of State Highway 165 
and extending approximately 11.2 miles upstream; 
and provides a 1-year frequency protection to adjacent 
agricultural lands. Total estimated Federal 
cost is $878,000. 
Local cooperation. The Cummins Drainage 
District has provided the necessary rights-of-way for 
project construction plus cash requirements totaling 
five percent of the total project costs. In addition, 
the drainage district is accomplishing all required 
relocations. Operation and maintenance of the 
channel features have been turned over to Cummins 
Drainage District. 
12-4

VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 
Condition as of Sep 30. The construction contract 
was awarded Sep. 12, 1989, and construction 
was essentially completed on Aug. 17, 1990. 
8. CHAUVIN BAYOU, LA 
Location. The Chauvin Bayou area is located 
immediately north of the city of Monroe, Louisiana. 
It is bounded on the west by the Ouachita River, on 
the north by Bayou Bartholomew, and on the east by 
Bayou DeSiard. 
Existing Project. The plan of improvement consists 
of a 250-cfs pumping plant located adjacent to 
Chauvin Bayou at the Ouachita River levee and a 
water control structure in Canal L-11. The project 
provides the Chauvin Bayou area with improved 
flood protection. The total Federal cost of the project 
was $4,240,410.13. 
Local cooperation. The city of Monroe, 
Louisiana, and the Ouachita Parish Police Jury 
were the local sponsors for the project. They provided 
the necessary rights-of-way and relocations 
for project construction plus cash requirements 
totaling twenty-five percent of the total project 
costs. In addition, they will operate and maintain 
the project. 
Condition as of Sep 30. The construction contract 
for the Canal L-11 control structure was 
awarded Jun. 29, 1991 and is physically complete. 
The construction contract for the pumping plant was 
awarded in November 1991 and is complete. Both 
structures have been transferred to the local sponsors 
for operation and maintenance. 
9. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA 
Location. East bank of Ouachita River between 
Bastrop, LA, and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the 
west bank at West Monroe, Columbia, and 
Bawcomville. 
Existing project. There are 105.8 miles of levee 
on the east bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three 
loops on the west bank. A Summary Report authorized 
gravel surfacing 117.4 miles of levee, and 
enlarging 36.6 miles of levee. In addition, Congress 
added $2,500,000 in FY 94 for design and construction 
of bank stabilization work to protect the levee 
around Columbia, LA. Estimated Federal cost if 
$29,500,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is 
$5,404,000. 
Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances 
of local cooperation are fully described on page 
12-6 of FY 80 Annual Report. A supplemental 
agreement for the Bawcomville segment was executed 
in FY 90. 
The 1991 Water and Energy Appropriations Act 
gave the Federal government responsibility for the 
repair and/or replacement of the deteriorated drainage 
structures. The Assurances Agreement for Local 
Cooperation was supplemented to reflect this change 
in responsibility. The supplemental agreement covered 
work performed in Fiscal Years 1992, 1993, and 
1994. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Item 1 of the Monroe 
to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed 
Jul. 7, 1978. Additional work was deferred 
pending results of a comprehensive study of the 
entire Ouachita River Levee System. A summary 
report indicating that it is economically feasible to 
raise portions of the existing levee to authorized 
grade and that complete rehabilitation of the levee 
system is necessary was approved by LMVD on Oct. 
1, 1986. The study results were disseminated to the 
project sponsor and interested parties in October 
1986. The Project was reclassified as an active project 
on May 7, 1987. The final summary report was 
sent to the Office of the Chief of Engineers in July 
1988 and design was initiated on the Bawcomville 
segment of the Ouachita River levees. A construction 
contract for the Bawcomville levee enlargement 
was awarded in FY 90, and is complete. In FY 95 we 
lined six deteriorated culverts, replaced five deteriorated 
drainage structures, and completed the bank 
stabilization work to protect the levee at Columbia, 
LA. We also awarded a contract to replace the headwalls 
and gates at ten drainage structures. 
10. OUACHITA RIVER AND 
TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA 
Location. Improvements comprising comprehensive 
projects are on main stem Ouachita River, AR 
and LA, on its tributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri 
Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, AR. Description of 
Ouachita River Basin is presented in greater detail 
on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. 
Existing project. The authorized general plan 
for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita 
River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 
12-E. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the 
Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA, 
project to include 10 water-retention lakes in the 
western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in 
Arkansas and 6 local levee units along the main 
stem of the bayou in Louisiana. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for 
completed features of comprehensive project. (See 
individual statements for further details.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, 
DeGray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou 
Bartholomew and Tributaries, and Ouachita River 
Levees are shown in individual reports in 1985. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on 
those features which are complete or not started 
are in Table 12-E. Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam- 
Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows 
12-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the individual 
reports in 1985 report. 
Reconnaissance studies of flooding problems in 
Ouachita Parish, LA, were initiated in January 
1994. Study efforts are concentrating on the developing 
urban area around Monroe, LA. The reconnaissance 
report, completed in January 1995, recommended 
a feasibility study be conducted on flood 
reduction for the River Styx Bayou area under 
authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
1948, as amended. The study will address alternative 
sized pumping stations. The final Detailed Project 
Report will be completed in November 1995. 
Planning and design for the Youngs Bayou Project 
are still on hold due to the Sponsor's inability to 
participate in the project. 
11. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MS AND LA 
Location. The basin comprises most of the 
South-central portion of Mississippi and a small part 
of southeast Louisiana. The Pearl River begins in 
Neshoba County, MS, and flows southwesterly 113 
miles to the vicinity of Jackson, MS, then southeasterly 
233 miles to the vicinity of Bogalusa, LA. At 
that point, the Pearl River splits into the East and 
West Pearl Rivers, and flows southerly 44 and 48 
miles, respectively, before entering the Rigolets and 
Lake Borgne. 
Existing projects. The Jackson-East Jackson 
Flood Control Project provides for improvements of 
the Pearl River at Jackson, MS. This project 
includes two levee systems totaling 13.1 miles in 
length, with two pumping stations, four gated outlets, 
and 5.34 miles of channel rectification including 
three cutoffs with a total length of 2.2 miles in the 
Pearl River. This project was authorized by the 
Flood Control Act of Jul. 14, 1960. Construction 
began in July 1964 and work was completed in 
FY 68. Total Federal cost of the project was 
$7,190,200. The FY 83 Jobs Bill authorized extension 
of the Jackson-East Jackson West Bank levee 
system along the Fortification Street 1-55 exit. This 
extension was initiated and completed in FY 84. 
Public Law 98-63, dated Jul. 29, 1983, authorized 
the vicinity of Jackson project. This authority provided 
for additional measures to prevent recurring 
flood damages along the Pearl River at Jackson and 
included 3.3 miles of floodway clearing and enlarging 
the opening at the Highway 25 Bridge. This 
work has been completed. Mitigation lands for the 
clearing were purchased by the local sponsor in May 
1985 and the Corps has reimbursed the local sponsor 
to cover the cost of these lands. Total Federal 
cost of this project is $1,800,000. 
Authorized projects. Public Law 99-88, dated 
Aug. 15, 1985, authorized planning, design, engineering, 
and construction of a levee system in 
Slidell, LA, to protect 3,265 residential and commercial 
structures from floods in the West Pearl. Public 
Law 99-662, dated Nov. 17, 1986, authorized construction 
of Shoccoe Dam and various flood control 
measures for Carthage-Leake County, MS. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described 
in full on page 12-6 of the FY 92 report. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. An overall basin study 
is essentially complete, except for alternative studies 
to Shoccoe Dry Dam as discussed below. Flood control 
feasibility studies for Jackson, MS, recommending 
Shoccoe Dam, and for Slidell, LA, recommending 
a 15-mile levee system, have been completed. 
Detailed engineering and design studies were on 
hold for the Slidell levee system, due to the failure of 
a local funding referendum. The local sponsor is now 
seeking alternative funding sources. As a result of 
upstream opposition, Shoccoe Dam is not implementable. 
In response to a request by the local 
sponsor, the Pearl River Basin Development District, 
reconnaissance studies to evaluate alternatives 
to Shoccoe for flood damage reduction in the Jackson 
Metropolitan Area have been completed and a 
potentially feasible levee plan identified. A Feasibility 
Cost Sharing Agreement was signed with the 
Local Sponsor on Sep. 25, 1991, and feasibility studies 
are nearing completion. The feasibility studies 
are focusing on a comprehensive levee system and 
are scheduled for completion in February 1996. 
Studies of various flood control measures for 
Carthage-Leake County, Columbia and Picayune, 
MS; Bogalusa, LA, and the Bogue Chitto Subbasin 
have been completed. None were found economically 
feasible. Navigation studies have been conducted 
on the East and West Pearl Rivers. Results of 
these studies indicate that maintenance necessary 
to reopen the existing West Pearl River navigation 
project is economically justified. The final EIS was 
filed with EPA in March 1994. Studies indicate that 
the West Pearl River Navigation Project is economically 
justified, engineeringly feasible, and in the 
overall public interest. Maintenance dredging was to 
resume in the spring of 1995; however, the Corps 
was enjoined from dredging until a trial could be 
held in Federal court. At present, additional environmental 
studies are being performed to address 
the impact on a threatened species of mussel. Maintenance 
dredging is scheduled to resume in April 
1997. Studies also indicate that the East Pearl 
River does not have sufficient existing flows to support 
a 7- to 9-foot-deep navigation channel. The 
navigation study for Port Bienville, MS, has been 
terminated due to withdrawal of the Hancock 
County Port and Harbor Commission as local sponsor. 
Reconnaissance studies of flow distribution 
between the West Pearl River and the East Pearl 
River (boundary between the States of Louisiana 
and Mississippi) in the Lower Basin have been completed. 
A water resources development plan for flow 
redistribution in the Lower Basin was found economically 
feasible. However, the primary benefit of 
12-6

VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 
the plan would accrue to recreation. Reconnaissance 
studies did not find any problem that would be 
solved by a Federal project, given the current policies 
and priorities of the Administration. Investigations 
of low flow conditions in the Walkiah Bluff 
area were initiated in FY 95 under authority of Section 
307(d) of WRDA 90. A detailed project report is 
scheduled for completion in September 1996. Reconnaissance 
studies of flood damage prevention and 
erosion control along Caney Creek in Jackson, MS, 
have been completed. These studies indicated that 
flood damages attributable to headwater flooding 
from Caney Creek are relatively insignificant and 
will not economically justify a water resource 
improvement plan under current conditions. Studies 
also found that most of the more serious streambank 
erosion problems along the creek have been corrected 
through actions undertaken by other public 
entities and agencies. 
12. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, 
ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA 
Location. The project is located in the southeastern 
portion of the State of Louisiana and consists of 
the area bounded by the West Pearl River on the 
east, Interstate 10 on the west, and Lake Pontchartrain 
on the south. 
Authorized project. The project is broken into 
two segments of levees. The segment north of 1-10 
will consist of 4.0 miles of levee, a pumping station, 
a floodgate structure, and minor drainage structures. 
This levee will protect the Slidell area north 
of 1-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year 
hydrological event on the Pearl River. The segment 
south of 1-10 will consist of 9.0 miles of levees, three 
pumping stations, floodgates, and minor drainage 
structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area 
south of 1-10 from flooding associated with a 200- 
year hydrological event on the Pearl River and provides 
the same level of protection against hurricane 
surges. These two levee segments total 13 miles of 
levee and would protect some 3,029 homes. Estimated 
Federal cost is $29,867,000. Estimated non- 
Federal cost is $9,956,000. 
Local cooperation. The project sponsor, St. 
Tammany Levee Board, and the Assistant Secretary 
of the Army (Civil Works), in an agreement consistent 
with the Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriation 
Act Public Law 99-88) and Senate Report 
1567, signed the Local Cooperation Agreement Jun. 
30, 1986. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Coordinated with project sponsor, providing necessary 
assistance. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Completed resolution 
of comments on the General Design Memorandum 
for north levee only. Preparation of plans and specifications 
is on hold pending identification of a source 
of funding for the project by locals. No construction 
has taken place. 
13. PORTER BAYOU, MS 
Location. Porter Bayou is located in Bolivar and 
Sunflower Counties, MS. It lies approximately 25 
miles east of the Mississippi River, is approximately 
5 miles south of Cleveland, MS, and runs through 
the town of Shaw, MS. 
Existing project. The plan of improvement 
called for selective snagging and clearing of Porter 
Bayou from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3. This plan provides 
a 0.5-year frequency protection for the Porter 
Bayou area. All construction was performed from 
one side of the stream, leaving the other side undisturbed. 
The total estimated Federal cost of the project 
is $860,000. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. The 2.55-mile reach 
which contained a growth of aquatic weed was successfully 
treated in FY 93 and this one remaining 
portion of the project was turned over to the local 
sponsor for operation and maintenance on Sep. 30, 
1993. 
14. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM 
(VICKSBURG DISTRICT) 
Location. On Red River and its tributaries 
below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, 
and Louisiana. (Refer to Geological Survey State 
maps and folio "Maps of Red River" - 1958 edition.) 
Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1946 
approved general plan for flood control on Red River 
below Denison Dam, TX and OK, which provides for 
construction of six flood control reservoirs in combination 
with existing or authorized Federal and non- 
Federal levee improvements, modified as required, 
and channel stabilization at locations where levee 
setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act 
further authorized incorporation of several separate 
existing projects for flood damage prevention along 
Red River below Denison, above jurisdiction of the 
MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83rd 
Cong., 2nd sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 
84th Cong., 1st sess., and Public Law 645, 86th 
Cong., 1st sess., plan of improvement was amended 
to include additional projects as indicated in following 
lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered 
in general flood control plan for the Red 
River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control 
projects incorporated into project in Vicksburg District. 
(See Table 12-F for new projects and Table 
12-G for incorporated projects.) 
Local cooperation. See individual reports 
herein. 
12-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
15. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON 
DAM, LEVEES AND BANK 
STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG 
DISTRICT) 
Location. Along the main stem of the Red River 
from the head of the levee system immediately 
above Index, AR, through the southwest corner of 
Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, LA, on the right 
bank, and Pineville, LA. on the left bank. 
Existing project. Raising and strengthening 
existing and authorized Red River levees to provide 
protection against flooding and bank protection 
works at locations where levee setbacks are impossible 
or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and 
strengthening existing and authorized Red River 
levees to provide against a flood approximately 20 
percent greater than the flood of 1945, the flood of 
record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank 
protection works are to be constructed at locations 
where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. 
Estimated cost for new work (October 1995) is 
$82,636,000 Federal and $5,386,000 non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation 
are fully described on page 12-10 of FY 1984 
Annual Report. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, 
and preparation of plans and specifications. Rehabilitation 
of Levee item No. 1 in Arkansas was completed. 
A report on rehabilitation of the levee 
system within Arkansas was submitted to higher 
authority and approved. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated 
in February 1948 and the levee and bank stabilization 
are complete with the exception of levee 
rehabilitation within the state of Arkansas. 
16. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Inspection of completed work was accomplished at 
a cost of $304,699 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of 
Sep. 30, 1995, is $4,014,704. 
17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Emergency flood control activities-repair, 
flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 
99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) 
FY 95 costs for the period were $303,548 for disaster 
preparedness. 
Total Public Law 99 cost during FY 95 was 
$303,548. 
Snagging and clearing of navigable streams 
and tributaries in the interest of flood control 
(Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 
780, 83rd Cong.) 
No activity during the period. 
18. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION 
WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1956 
Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) 
Total FY costs for emergency bank protection 
work was $455,407. This included work on Highway 
119, Derry, LA, $5,210; Highway 495, Natchitoches 
Parish, LA, $12,623; and Culley-Brashear Ditch, 
Madison County, MS, $15,121. U.S. Highway 65, 
East Carroll Parish, LA, $15,597. Hwy 80 Clear 
Creek, $379,118; and Dillons Bridge Bogue Chitto, 
$27,738. 
Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, 
Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended 
(preauthorization). 
Boeuf-Tensas Basin, $184,270; Black Pond Slough 
$33,622; Canal 43, AR $20,161; Ouachita Parish 
River Styx $114,275; Tensas Parish, LA $22,700; 
and Cocodrie Bayou, LA, $5,605. 
Project modifications for improvement of 
environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 
99-662, as amended (preauthorization). 
During the FY, $1,137 was expended on initial 
appraisals; $142,041 on Lake Whittington Weir, MS; 
and $77,007 on Narrows Dam, Lake Greeson, AR. 
Project modifications for improvement of 
environmental pursuant to Section 307(d), 
Public Law 102-580. 
During the FY, $176,327 was expended on Pearl 
River, Walkiah Bluff, MS and LA. 
12-8

VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 
TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Funds 
Section to Sep. 30, 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 1995 
Ouachita and 
Black Rivers 
below Camden, 
AR (6.5-foot 
navigation 
project) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
-- $ 5,248,6191 
-- 5,248,6191 
1. Ouachita and 
Black Rivers 
below Camden, 
AR (9-foot 
navigation 
project) 
2. Red River 
Emergency Bank 
Protection 
(Contrib. Funds) 
3. Red River 
Waterway 
Mississippi 
River to 
Shreveport, LA 
(Contrib. Funds) 
5. Aloha- 
Rigolette, LA 
6. Bayou Bodcau 
and Tributaries, 
AR and LA 
7. Canal 43, AR 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
100,000 
195,727 
0 605,000 
27,291 75,503 
0 230,579,251 
453,099 229,999,158 
5,322,000 4,707,000 6,617,598 6,722,000 116,925,103 
5,341,565 4,671,819 6,426,981 6,968,452 116,692,521 
7,300,000 
4,211,400 
0 3,500,000 6,000,000 52,408,000 
7,168,247 586,791 2,700,965 45,658,500 
6,825 
6,825 
123,681,000 146,625,000 145,000,000 
135,607,493 159,131,906 124,656,309 
24,219,000 1,262,950,000 
60,679,112 1,262,203,525 
6,221,000 5,689,000 6,189,000 7,096,000 52,183,791 
5,423,654 5,985,700 6,650,038 7,267,016 51,091,129 
21,716 406,231 
-- 237,736 
0 1,265,077 5,067,552 
30,558 674,929 4,292,615 
399,000 301,000 450,000 168,000 2,249,000 
393,637 264,174 342,951 265,775 2,198,502 
-- 1,038,000 
-- 1,037,952 
372,000 281,000 317,962 221,000 1,822,962 
400,856 235,979 351,344 240,675 1,600,919 
0 
348
0 
25 
-14,000 
7,574
0 
80 
24,000 902,000 
20,161 898,061 
32,553 
12-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 12-A 
(Continued) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Funds 
Section to Sep. 80, 
in Text Project Funding FT 92 FY 98 FY 94 FY 96 1996 
8. Chauvin Bayou New Work 
Approp. 700,000 987,000 0 0 4,248,000 
Cost 1,721,264 1,066,450 30,633 0 4,245,863 
9. Ouachita River New Work 
Levees, LA Approp. 2,429,758 4,400,000 6,300,000 4,500,000 22,068,758 
Cost 628,042 1,928,358 3,679,603 5,456,388 15,604,951 
11. Pearl River New Work 
Vicinity of Approp. -- 0 0 2,080,000 
Jackson, MS Cost -- 0 0 2,079,999 
Maint. 
Approp. 480,000 395,000 231,000 748,000 1,951,500 
Cost 390,516 342,372 333,596 791,623 1,858,107 
12. Pearl River, New Work 
Slidell, St. Approp. 100,000 150,000 0 0 3,606,000 
Tammany Parish, Cost 193,639 40,250 77,520 14,356 3,581,315 
LA 
13. Porter Bayou, New Work 
MS Approp. 0 14,000 0 1,049,278 
Cost 555,000 19,052 0 1,049,278 
14. Red River New Work 
below Denison Approp. 2,300,000 1,356,000 3,500,000 1,500,000 73,461,000 
Dam Levees and Cost 3,408,656 2,821,865 1,250,675 2,206,193 70,996,285 
Bank Stabilization 
(Vicksburg District) 
1. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 
2. Includes $3,312,000 PL 98-8 Jobs Bill. Excludes $47,854,000 previously allocated to New Orleans District. 
3. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. 
12-10

VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 
TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
May 17, 1950 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Dec. 31, 1970 
Aug. 13, 1968 
Aug. 13, 1968 
Nov. 28, 1990 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Jun. 30, 1948 
Nov. 17,1986 
OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, 
AR (See Section 1 of Text) 
Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel 
and deepening canal to Felsenthal, AR. 
Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and 
dams and channel improvements. 
Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D'Arbonne in 
connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam 
and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam. 
RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See 
Section 2 of Text). 
Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works 
and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. 
RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO 
SHREVEPORT, LA (See Section 3 of Text) 
Develop a 9 by 200 feet, approximately 236 miles long from 
Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River 
and Red River to Shreveport, LA, consisting of realinement, 
bank stabilization, and construction five locks and dams. 
ALOHA-RIGOLETTE AREA, LA (See Section 5 of Text) 
BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA 
(See Section 6 of Text) 
Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee, construct 
stream closure landside drainage channel and three 
culverts on Red Chute Bayou and clearing and snagging 
channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat 
River near junction with Cutoff Bayou, and construct 
control structures on Flat River near junction with Red 
Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 
feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. 
CANAL 43, AR (See Section 7 of Text) 
Channel enlargement 
CANEY CREEK, MS 
Authorizes construction of such bank stabilization measures 
for Caney Creek in the vicinity of Jackson, MS, between 
McDowell Road and Raymond Road as the Secretary 
determines necessary for flood damage prevention and 
erosion control along approximately 3,000 feet of the creek. 
12-11 
S. Doc. 117, 
81st Cong., 1st sess. 
S. Doc. 112, 
86th Cong., 2d sess. 
Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated 
Nov. 25, 1970, and 
H. Doc. 92-109, 
92d Cong., 1st seas. 
H. Doc. 304, 
90th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 304, 
90th Cong., 2d sess. 
Public Law 101- 
101 Cong., 2nd seass. 
H. Doc. 203, 
89th Cong., 1st sess. 
Sec. 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948, 
as amended 
Authorized by Chief 
of Engineers, 
October 31, 1988. 
Public Law 99-662, 
99th Cong., 2d sess.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 12-B 
(Continued) 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Jun. 30, 1948 
as amended 
Jun. 30, 1948, 
as amended 
Nov. 17, 1986 
May 17, 1950 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Jun. 13, 1983 
Jul. 29, 1983 
Aug. 15, 1985 
CHAUVIN BAYOU, LA (See Section 8 of Text) 
Construction of a 250-cfs pumping plant located adjacent to 
Chauvin Bayou at the Ouachita River levee and a water 
control structure in Canal L-11. 
LEAD BAYOU, MS 
Channel enlargement. 
MONROE AND WEST MONROE, LA, AND OUACHITA 
PARISH, LA 
Authorizes such structural and nonstructural measures as 
the Secretary deems feasible to prevent flood damage to 
the cities of Monroe and West Monroe, LA, and Ouachita 
Parish, LA. 
OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA 
(See Section 10 of Text) 
Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of 
floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; 
local protection at Bawcomville, LA (subsequently 
constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local 
interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew 
channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow 
Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at 
Calion, AR; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and 
Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions 
thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on 
the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief 
of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work 
on the levees. 
PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA (See Section 11 of Text) 
Construction of levee system and channel rectification, Pearl 
River, vicinity of Jackson, MS 
Accomplish the clearing and channel improvements at 
Hwy 25 bridge on the Pearl River in the vicinity of 
Jackson, MS. 
Design and construct protection to prevent flooding along 
the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS 
Planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee 
system for Slidell, LA, pending binding cost-sharing 
arrangements acceptable to the Secretary of the Army or 
under terms and conditions provided in subsequent 
legislation when enacted into law. 
Sec. 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948, 
as amended. 
Authorized by the 
Chief of Engineers 
Feb. 6, 1990. 
Sec. 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948, 
as amended. 
Authorized by Chief 
of Engineers 
Jun. 10, 1980. 
Public Law 99-662, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
S. Doc. 117, 
81st Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 441, 
86th Cong., 1st sess. 
S. Doc. 153, 
98th Cong., 1st sess. 
Public Law 98-63, 
98th Cong., 1st sess. 
Public Law 99-88, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
12-12

VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 
TABLE 12-B 
(Continued) 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Document. 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Jun. 30, 1948, 
as amended 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 28, 1990 
Jul. 24, 1946 
Aug. 13, 1968 
Aug. 13, 1968 
Authorizes the Pearl River Basin, including Shoccoe, MS, for 
the construction of the Shoccoe Dam plus upstream flood 
control measures at east-central Leake County, south part 
of Carthage, MS, Highway 35 vicinity, upstream reservoirs 
on the Pearl River and upstream channels on the Pearl 
River and elsewhere in Leake County. 
PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA 
(See Section 12 of Text) 
Authorizes flood control improvements for Pearl River Basin, 
St. Tammany, LA, subject to a favorable Chiefs report and 
approval by the Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. 
PORTER BAYOU, MS (See Section 13 of Text) 
Selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou, MS, from 
mile 12.5 to mile 32.3 
RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA (See Section 14 of Text) 
Water Resources Development of 1986 authorized for 
construction the project for mitigation of wildlife losses, 
Red River Waterway, LA, which may include all or such 
portion of any land adjacent to the Loggy Bayou Wildlife 
Management Area. 
Water Resources Development Act of 1990 modified the 
mitigation project to authorize the Secretary to acquire 
an additional 12,000 acres adjacent to or close to the 
Bayou Bodcau Wildlife Management Area. 
RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM LEVEES AND 
BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DIST.) (See 
Section 15 of Text) 
Levee and bank stabilization. 
Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on 
Cypress Creek; realining and stabilizing the banks of the 
Red River; and recreational facilities from the Mississippi 
River to Denison Dam, OK and TX. 
RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA, TO 
INDEX, AR (See Section 16 of Text) 
Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River 
from Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR. 
Public Law 99-662, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Public Law 99-662 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Sec. 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948, 
as amended. 
Authorized by Chief 
of Engineers, 
Feb. 18, 1982. 
Public Law 99-662, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Public Law 101-640, 
101st Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 602, 
79th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 304, 
90th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 304, 
90th Cong., 2d sess. 
12-13

TABLE 12-C OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA 
(9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
Mmin 
Depth 
Greatest on 
Available Lower 
Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter 
Above Width for Full Lift Normal Still at 
Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal Per- Total 
from of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Character cent Estimated 
Nearest Black Chamber Location Chamber Water (feet Level or Kind of Type of Com- Project Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost 
Jonesville, LA 10 25 84 600 30 34 14 Piling Moving Tainter gated dam; 1002 $ 43,499,000 
bascule gated 
navigation pass; 
steel mitering lock 
gates 
Columbia, LA 5 117 84 600 18 52 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 952 45,801,000 
fixed crest 
navigation pass; 
steel mitering lock 
gates 
Felsenthal, AR 1 227 84 600 18 701 13 Earth do Tainter gated dam; 882 101,946,000 
hinged crest gated 
navigation pass; 
steel mitering lock 
gates. 
Calion, AR 7 283 84 600 12 77 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 882 70,754,000 
(H. K. hinged crest gated 
Thatcher) navigation pass; 
steel mitering lock 
gates. 
Estimated Federal Cost $262,000,000 
Estimated Non-Federal Cost 17,754,000 
Total Estimated Cost 279,754,000 
1. Fish and wildlife impoundment level. Navigation pool elevation 65. 
2. The percent complete reflects all work within the pool. 
I
0I 
a
0

VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 
TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
Cost to Sep. 1995 
For Last 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual and Mo. and Yr. 
Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed 
Bayou Bartholomew, LA and AR1,2,3,4 -- 1931 $ 45,874 $ 42,857 1 
Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA1,2, 4 -- 1941 19,000 37,804 1 
Big Black River, MS 1,4',5 -- 1895 15,000 -- 1 
Big Sunflower River, MS 1,4'6 '7 -- 1942 560,027 459,328 1 
Boeuf River, LA1 ,3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ,9 -- 1949 30,000 103,737 1 
Claiborne County Port, MS -- 1985 2,000,000 279,718 Dec. 1983 
Cypress Bayou and Waterway between 
Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA15 Complete 1971 202,817 452,611 Dec. 1914 
Homochitto River, MS4 -- 1910 15,482 8,5181 
Lake Providence Harbor, LA -- 1985 208,537 4,458,575 Nov. 1963 
Little Missouri River, AR1,4 '5 -- 1873 19,992 -- 1 
Little River, LA1,4 ,5 ,10 -- 1890 1,500 -- 1 
Little Tallahatchie River, MS" 7 -- 1913 19,000 -- 1 
Madison Parish Port, LA -- 1985 656,000 770,070 Dec. 1980 
Mouth of Yazoo River, MS1 , 7 "' -- 1953 1,179,211 692,790 1 
Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA, 
Felsenthal Canal -- 193712 -- 4,387,192 1 
Overton-Red River Waterway, LA -- 1985 -- -- 1 
Pearl River, MS -- 1985 8,562,908 3,345,408 1956 
Red River below Fulton, AR1,16 , 17 ,18 -- 1978 1,963,806 2,147,8901 
Red River Waterway 
LA, AR, OK, and TX'1, 17 , 18 -- 1969 -- -- 1 
Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA 
to Daingerfield, TX -- 1976 150,800 -- 
Removings snags and wrecks from 
Mississippi River below mouth of 
Missouri River and from Old and 
Atchafalaya Rivers1 1 -- 1948 -- 272,5001 
Rosedale Harbor, MS -- 1985 2,000,000 4,235,574 Sep. 1978 
Saline River, AR1 ,3,4 ,5 -- 1931 26,900 12,792 1 
Tallahatchie and Coldwater 
Rivers, MS1 4'5 
-- 1939 43,481 173,066 
Tensas River and Bayou 
Macon, LA1 8 "3 
-- 1949 38,367 85,352 
12-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(Continued) 
Cost to Sep. 1995 
For Last 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual and Mo. and Yr. 
Project Status Report For. Construction Maintenance Completed 
Yalobusha River, MS1 ,4,5,14 -- 1937 7,000 15,936 1 
Yazoo River, MS -- 1987 9,341,826 1,209,895 
Yellow Bend Port, AR Complete 1991 3,793,069 354,121 Aug. 1991 
1. Status and Date unavailable. 
2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 1962, 64th Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 
3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 
4. Inactive project. No commerce. 
5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 
6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. 
(Abandonment of entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 
7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin. 
8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 
9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work above Girard, LA. (Abandonment of entire project recommended 
erroneously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 
10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 
11. No additional funds available under this project. Work is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi 
River and tributaries. 
12. Year authorized. 
13. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 
14. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control project including 
channel clearing and rectification and Grenada Lake on Yalobusha River. 
15. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 
16. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. 
17. Incorporated in the project "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River Shreveport, LA" Sept. 30, 1976. 
18. Emergency bank protection on this project is reported separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection." Two 
reaches, "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA" and "Red River Waterway-Shreveport, LA, 
Daingerfield, TX," are also reported separately. 
12-16

VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 
TABLE 12-E OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: 
EXISTING PROJECT 
(See Section 10 of Text) 
For Last Estimated 
Full Report Federal 
See Annual New Work 
Project Report for: Cost 
Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR 1985 $ 44,100,000 
DeGray Lake, AR 1985 72,034,0002 
Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR 1985 20,900,000 
Calion, AR 1960 970,9963 
Columbia, LA 1941 204,740 
Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA, to mouth 
of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, LA 1961 3,025,1813 
Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR 1957 354,8023 
Ozan Creek, AR 1957 57,7423 
Terre Noire Creek, AR 1948 123,7003 
Pine Bluff, AR, local protection 1954 172,5823 
Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) 1984 2,561,0003 
Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (1) 9,400,000 
Total $153,904,7434 
1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
See individual reports herein. 
Includes $5,800,000 for water supply to be reimbursed by local interests. 
Actual cost of completed project. 
Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, AR, project, which is inactive. The latest estimated cost 
(1954)was $4,190,000. 
12-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 12-F RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM 
(VICKSBURG DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS 
(See Sec. 14 of Text) 
Drainage Conserva- Flood 
Area tion Control Estimated 
(square Storage (acre- Federal 
Project Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost 
Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR2 and LA -- 1,158 -- -- $25,100,000 
Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA -- -- -- -- 70,717 
Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA5 -- -- -- -- 243,3363 
Caddo Lake, LA' Caddo Lake -- -- -- 3,586,000 
Campti-Clarence Area in 
Natchitoches Parish, LA Red River -- -- -- 1,950,0003 
Garland City, AR1 '6 -- -- -- -- 1,450,000 
Maniece Bayou, AR -- -- -- -- 970,032 
McKinney Bayou, AR7 ' 8 -- -- -- -- 5,610,000 
Posten Bayou, AR and LA2 '6 '9 -- -- -- -- 560,000 
Red River below Denison Dam levees 
and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA"3 -- -- -- -- 66,775,000 
Total 99,191,885 
1. Details presented in individual report herein. 
2. Construction on this project not started. 
3. In addition, non-Federal funds are: 
Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ................................................... $5,300,000 
Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA (cash contribution)..................................... 89,047 
Caddo Lake, LA ....................................................................... 28,000 
Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA ............................................. ... 480,000 
East Point ............................................................................. 67,000 
Garland City, AR ....................................................................... 6,000 
Maniece Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ...................................................... 18,000 
McKinney Bayou, AR (cash contribution)..................................................... 508,000 
Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, TX,AR, and LA ........................ .1,560,000 
4. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. 
5. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. 
6. Inactive. 
7. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. 
8. Joint-use pool (sediment). 
9. Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, AR," under provision of 
Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 
12-18

VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 
TABLE 12-G RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM 
(VICKSBURG DISTRICT): INCORPORATED 
PROJECTS (See Sec. 14 of Text) 
For Last 
Flood Estimated Full Report 
Control Federal See Annual 
Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For: 
Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and 
Rapides Parishes, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 $ 1,653,2371 1956 
Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA2 Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,7401 4 
Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and 
Loggy Bayou, LA Channel improvement 1941 319,2001 1948 
Bayou Pierre, LA Channel enlargement 1936 255,5291 4 
Black Bayou Lake, LA5'6 Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 
Colfax, Grant Parish, LA Cutoff 1938 70,3481,7 1938 
Grant Parish, below Colfax, LA Levees 1938 38,8091 1941 
Hempstead County levee district 
No.1, AR Levee enlargement 1938 88,0061 1941 
Natchitoches Parish, LA Levee and appurtenances 1936 1,529,9271,8 1956 
Pineville, Red River, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,4261 1953 
Red River in vicinity of 
Shreveport, LA Bank protection 1944 3,908,0001 1953 
Red River Parish, LA Levee enlargement 1936 149,4351 1939 
Saline Point, LA Cutoff 1936 124,1111 1945 
Wallace Lake, LA Flood-control reservoir 1936 1,219,3711,3 4 
Total $15,467,134 
1. Actual cost. 
2. Project transferred to Vicksburg District, August 1982. 
3. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA, 
$1,027,000; Wallace Lake, LA, $17,164. 
4. Included in this report. 
5. Work not started. 
6. Inactive. 
7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control 
Act of 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 
8. In addition, $25,000 was expended from contributed funds. 
12-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 12-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS
Cost to Sep. 1995 
For Last 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual and Mo. and Yr. 
Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed 
Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and 
Rapides Parishes, LA3 1956 $ 1,896,826 $ -- Apr. 1955 
Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and 
Loggy Bayou, LA' 1948 319,200 -- Jan. 1948 
Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA 1985 -- 5,064,213 Apr. 1961 
Bayou Pierre, LA 1985 -- 278,255 FY 1939 
Bayou Pierre in vicinity of 
Shreveport, LA1"
2 1951 243,3362 -- Jun. 1939 
Big Black River, MS3 1956 910,185 670,7503 
Big Choctaw Bayou, LA3 '4 1966 248,823 -- 
Black Bayou Reservoir, LA1,5 ,6 1945 -- -- -- 
Blakely Mt. Dam - Lake 
Ouachita, Ouachita River, AR 1985 34,023,108 80,733,582 Oct. 1955 
Caddo Lake Dam, LA 1986 -- 1,487,523 -- 
Campti-Clarence Area in 
Natchitoches Parish, LA 1978 1,655,700 -- Jul. 1978 
Colfax, Grant Parish, LA1 7 1938 70,348 -- -- 
DeGray Lake 
Caddo River, AR 1985 72,033,992 55,750,772 Dec. 1971 
East Point, LA 1969 286,069 3,051,536 Aug. 1968 
Garland City, AR 1976 1,335,841 -- Jul. 1974 
Grant Parish below Colfax, LA1 '3 1941 38,809 -- 3 
Hempstead County Levee District 
No. 1, AR1 '3 1941 88,006 -- 
Homochitto River, MS3 1956 205,000 144,650 
Maniece Bayou, AR1 ,2 1970 970,9322 -- Aug. 1969 
Monroe Floodwall, LA 1984 2,560,000 -- -- 
Murfreesboro Dam and Lake4 1951 -- -- -- 
Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, 
Little Missouri River, AR 1985 16,516,689 56,145,580 May 1950 
Natchez Port Area, MS3,4 1969 538,000 -- 5 
Natchitoches Parish, LA1 2 1956 1,529,478 -- Aug. 1955 
Pearl River, Jackson-East 
Jackson, MS 1986 290,000 -- -- 
Pineville, Red River, LA3 ,4 1953 232,426 -- Dec. 1951 
Lead Bayou, MS 1991 1,961,089 -- Nov. 1988 
12-20

VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 
TABLE 12-H 
(Continued) 
OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS
Cost to Sep. 1995 
For Last 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual and Mo. and Yr. 
Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed 
Posten Bayou, AR8 1973 -- -- -- 
Poverty Point, LA 1986 250,000 -- Oct. 1985 
Red River Parish, LA1 '3 1939 149,435 -- 
Red River in vicinity of 
Shreveport, LA' 1953 3,908,000 -- Mar. 1953 
Red River Waterway, 1994 855,497 -- -- 
Shreveport, LA to Index, LA9 
Saline Point, LA1'3 1945 124,111 -- -- 
Twelvemile Bayou, LA4 1966 335,433 -- May 1965 
Wallace Lake, LA 1985 -- 1,610,247 Dec. 1946 
1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 
2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: 
Amite River and tributaries ................................................................ $ 430 
Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA ..................................................... 89,047 
Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA .......................................................... 170,799 
Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ..................................................... 425,209 
M aniece Bayou, AR ....................................................................... 39,293 
Natchitoches Parish, LA ................................................................... 250,000 
3. Completion Date Unavailable. 
4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 
5. Construction not initiated. 
6. Inactive. 
7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control 
Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 
8. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by 
the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 
9. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. 
12-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 12-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Date Federal Contrib 
See Annual And Funds Funds 
Project Report For Authority Extended Exp 
Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA 1990 May 17, 1950 974,000 -- 
S. Doc. 117, 
81st Cong., 
1st sess. 
Buffalo River, MS' 1940 Nov 1986 -- -- 
McKinney Bayou, Finn 19632 Aug 1977 -- -- 
Bayou Segment, AR 
1. Deauthorized by Sec. 1002, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 
2. Date Authorized. 
12-22

VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 
TABLE 12-J ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
(96X3121) 
Federal Cost Totals by 
Item and CWIS Number FY 96 Categories 
SURVEYS (Category 100) 
Navigation Studies (110) 
Natchez Bluff, MS-12675 3,172 
Red River Navigation Study SNAKK (111)-10436273,616 
Subtotal 276,788 
Flood Damage Prevention (120) 
Hot Springs, Garland Co., AR -12737 35,984 
Jackson Metro Area, MS -12742 130,970" 
Ouachita Parish, LA-13263 203,766 
Ouachita River Basin, LA -13168 293391 
Subtotal 664,111 
Environmental SVCS/Partnership (140) 
Environmental SVC Partnership (140)-14190 4,084 
Miscellaneous Activities (170) 
Interagency Water Resources (173) -14713 57,548 
Special Investigations (171) -17250 14,767 
North American Waterfowl Management Plan (175) -53904 3,506 
Review of FERC Licenses (172)-598572,232 
Subtotal 78,054 
TOTAL (Category 100) 1,023,037 
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) 
Flood Plain Management Services (250) 
Claiborne Parish -83003 48,848 
Flood Plain Management Services -82030 18,365 
Quick Response -82045 5,982 
Special Studies Camp Robinson-83002 12,000 
Technical Services -82040 85,814 
171,009 
Hydrologic Studies (260) 
Hydrologic Studies (260) -53820 11,983 
TOTAL (Category 200)182992 
GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $ 1,206,029 
12-23

MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT *
This district comprises a portion of southeastern 
Missouri and southern illinois, western portions of 
Kentucky and Tennessee, a small portion of northern 
Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of 
Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage 
basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River 
south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn 
Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries 
south of Little River diversion channel and 
Commerce, MO, including St. Francis River Basin 
and White River and tributaries below Peach 
Orchard Bluff, AR, on the right bank and below 
Augusta, AR, on the left bank; also includes left 
bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of 
Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank 
levees from Cape Girardeau, MO, to about mile 605. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Page Tables 
1. Mayfield Creek, KY ................. 13-1 
2. Millington, TN .................... 13-2 
3. Inspection of completed flood control 
projects ........................... 13-2 
4. Flood control work under special 
authorization....................... 13-2 
5. Ecosystem Restoration work under 
special authorization ................ 13-2 
Table 13-A 
Table 13-B 
Table 13-C 
Table 13-D 
Table 13-E 
Table 13-F 
Page 
Cost & Financial 
Statement................. 13-3 
Authorizing Legislation ..... .13-3 
Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects.................. .13-4 
Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects ............ 13-5 
Deauthorized Projects ....... 13-6 
Active General 
Investigations ............. 13-7 
Flood Control 
1. MAYFIELD CREEK, KENTUCKY 
Location. Mayfield Creek is located in West 
Kentucky in Ballard, Carlisle and McCracken Counties. 
Project limits extend from the confluence of 
Mayfield Creek with the Mississippi River upstream 
25 miles to near the Graves-McCracken County line. 
Existing project. The project was approved for 
construction on Sept. 26, 1991, under the authority 
of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as 
amended. The project consists of selective clearing 
and snagging of debris and excavation of sediment 
deposits according to provisions contained in the 
"Stream Obstruction Removal Guidelines." The 
project would provide a level of protection less than 
1 year. However, positive drainage would be established 
and reduction in flood duration is accomplished. 
The estimated construction cost for the 
project is $3,367,000. 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
was executed with the Sponsor Chairman for 
The Mayfield Creek Coalition on Sept. 27, 1991. 
The sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, and relocations required for 
project construction and cash contribution sufficient 
to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of the 
total project cost. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction is completed 
up to 17.4 miles. Remaining work is scheduled 
for completion December 1995. 
13-1 
Flood Control

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
2. MILLINGTON, TN 
Location. Millington is located in north Shelby 
County, TN. 
Existing project. The project was approved for 
construction on May 14, 1990, under the authority of 
Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as 
amended. The project consists of 5,600 feet of levee 
along the right (north) bank of Big Creek in the 
reach between U.S. Highway 51 and the I.C. Railroad. 
The levee is designed to provide a 100-year 
frequency level of protection to the leveed area from 
backwater flooding. The estimated construction cost 
for the project is $890,000. A contract for project 
construction was awarded in August 1990. 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
was executed with the city of Millington on 
May 15, 1990. The sponsor is required to provide 
the lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations 
required for project construction and a cash contribution 
sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 
25 percent of total project cost. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Project flood protection 
was provided in February 1991. Remaining project 
related drainage modifications are scheduled to be 
completed early in calendar year 1995. 
3. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Inspected completed projects at a cost of $171,664 in 
the period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1995, was 
$2,371,234. This included in-depth inspection of 
projects. 
4. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, 
Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended 
(preauthorization). 
During this period $17,054 was expended on Raft 
Creek, AR; $23,568 on Dails Creek, Holly Grove, AR; 
$873 on Tar Creek, Chester County, TN; $8,036 on 
Main Ditch #8, Pemiscot Co. MO; and $66,489 on 
Arlington, KY. 
Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant 
to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as 
amended. 
During FY 1995, $376,626 was expended on Wolf 
River at U.S. Highway 51, Memphis, TN; $78,730 on 
Bartlett Road, Harrington Creek, Memphis, TN; $39 
on Royster Creek at Biloxi Street, Millington, TN. 
Emergency flood control activities, Public 
Law 99, 84th Cong. 
Federal cost was $303,609 for disaster preparedness 
and $124,872 for emergency operations in 
FY 95. 
Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 208, 
Public Law 780, 83rd Cong., as amended. 
During FY 1995, $33,317 was expended on 
Hatchie River in Alcorn and Tippah Counties, MS. 
5. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK 
UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Project Modifications for improvement of 
environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 
99-662, as amended (preauthorization). 
During this period $155 was expended on Ditch 
28 Control Structures and Levee, Mississippi 
County, AR; $61,907 on Simmons Field Control 
Structure, Mississippi County, AR; and $1,497 on 
Tunica Cutoff Weir, MS, AR. 
13-2

MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT 
TABLE 13-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Funds 
Section to Sep. 30, 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 1995 
1. Mayfield Creek, New Work 
TN Approp. $670,000 497,000 470,000 971,400 2,768,400 
Cost 662,814 483,843 445,944 944,601 2,609,332 
2. Millington, TN New Work 
Approp. 0 26,000 0 14,000 849,500 
Cost 1,074 21,793 6,112 5,896 836,677 
TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Jul. 24, 1946 Mayfield Creek, KY (See Sec. 1 of Text) Approved Sept. 26, 19911 
as amended 
Jun. 30, 1948 Millington, TN (See Sec. 2 of Text), Levee in City 
as amended of Millington. Approved May 14, 19901 
1. Authorized under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 
2. Authorized under authority of Sec. 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. 
13-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 13-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
Cost to Sep. 1995 
For Last 
Full Report Operation 
Be. Annual and Mo. and Yr. 
Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed 
Caruthersville Harbor, MO 1984 $768,992 $3,625,697 Dec. 1980 
Helena Harbor, AR 1984 90,847 6,785,482 Sep. 1963 
Elvis Stahr Harbor, KY 1984 149,827 6,623,924 Jan. 1963 
New Madrid Harbor, MO6 1984 196,373 1,282,733 Oct. 1970 
Obion River, TN1'3 1911 28,716-- 
Osceola Harbor, AR 1984 269,115 9,322,363 Nov. 1974 
Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River 
below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and 
Atchafalaya Rivers4'5 1948 -- 318,833 
White River, AR (below Newport) 1984 169,994 33,614,985 -- 
Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN 1984 586,500 12,519,319 1959 
1. No commerce. 
2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 
3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 
4. Completion date not available. 
5. No funds available under this project. Work being carried on under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi River and 
Tributaries." 
6. WRDA 92 (Section 102) modified authorization by directing the Secretary to assume responsibility for maintenance of 
New Madrid County Harbor constructed by non-Federal interest. 
13-4

MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT 
TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
Cost to Sep. 1996 
For Last 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual and Mo. and Yr. 
Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed 
Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN 
Bradford, TN 
Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL 1 
Drinkwater Sewer, MO 
Dyersburg, TN1 
Dyersburg, TN (SW) 
Fletcher Creek at Memphis, TN 
Grays Creek Canal Shelby Co., TN 
Hatchie River, Alcorn Co., MS 
Humboldt, TN 
Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN 
Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL3 
Nixon Creek, TN1 
Nonconnah Blvd. Nonconnah Creek, TN 
Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN 
Nonconnah Creek at Perkins Street, Memphis, TN 
N. Second St., Memphis, TN (Wolf River Bridge) 
N. Second St. at Wolf River, Memphis, TN 
Plainview Road Bridge, Chester County, TN 
Quince Road Bridge, Memphis, TN 
Sandy Creek Jackson, TN 
St. Francis River Highway No. 90, AR 
Treasure Island, MO 
Turner Creek, Corinth, MS 
US Hwy 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN 
W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY 
1977 
1984 
1964 
1984 
1962 
1981 
1993 
1985 
1987 
1989 
1960 
1955 
1952 
1983 
1987 
1993 
1983 
1991 
1991 
1993 
1985 
1985 
1981 
1987 
1984 
1983 
$ 70,363 
95,061 
147,000 
1,494,828 
229,6492 
1,820,869 
421,898 
155,280 
85,200 
1,141,407 
11,141,199 
1,132,704 
62,821 
249,999 
259,000 
830,781 
249,999 
367,012 
124,954 
156,565 
238,000 
161,000 
861,528 
100,600 
369,200 
1,674,180 
$ 
-- Dec. 1983 
-- Feb. 1964 
-- Jun. 1980 
-- Jun. 1962 
-- Oct. 1976 
-- Sept. 1991 
-- Aug. 1985 
-- Feb. 1986 
-- Apr. 1988 
-- May 1959 
-- Oct. 19594 
-- Dec. 1951 
-- Nov. 1981 
-- Dec. 1986 
-- Feb. 1992 
-- Sep. 1980 
-- Jan. 1990 
-- Sep. 1990 
-- Jul. 1991 
-- Dec. 1984 
-- Sep. 1985 
-- Mar. 1978 
-- Mar. 1987 
-- Mar. 1983 
-- Oct. 1976 
13-5 
1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 
2. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. 
3. Work being completed under Mississippi River and Tributaries project. 
4. Exclusive of Cache River Pumping Station.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 13-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Date Funds Funds 
Project Report For: Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River 
Basin, AR 1977 May 6, 81 -- -- 
Clarendon to Laconia Circle White River 
Basin, AR 1937 May 6, 81 -- -- 
Huntingdon, TN 1983 Sep 80 2,900,281 -- 
Long Lake Area, Helena, AR 1983 Jul 83 61,281 -- 
13-6

MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT 
TABLE 13-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
(96X3121) 
Federal Cost Totals by 
Item and CWIS Number FY 96 Categories 
SURVEYS (Category 100) 
Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) 
Hickman Bluff, KY - 77067 $158 
158 
Environmental Services Partnership (140) 
Environmental Services Partnership $118,012 
$118,012 
Miscellaneous Activities (170) 
Special Investigations (171) -17250 $12,159 
Intra Agency Water Resources Development-14713 41,537 
North American Waterfowl Mgmt (176) - 5390416217 
69,913 
Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) 
Dept. of Agriculture (181) - 77067$1178 
$1,178 
TOTAL (Category (100) $189,261 
COLLECTIONS AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) 
Flood Plain Management Services (250) 
Flood Plain Management Services134909 
134,909 
TOTAL (Category 200) $134,909 
GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $324,170 
13-7

ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT *
This district comprises those portions of southwestern 
Illinois and eastern Missouri embraced in 
drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western 
tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the 
mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern 
tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on left 
bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway 
upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at 
mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and 
Mississippi Rivers. The St. Louis District territory 
encompasses 27,000 square miles. District also 
includes drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the 
Little River diversion channel. Report on the Mississippi 
River between the Missouri River and mile 300 
is included in separate report on the Mississippi 
River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, 
MN. Report on the portion of the Illinois River 
downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is 
included in report of the Chicago District on the 
Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. Illinois Waterway, IL 
(St. Louis Dist.)..................... 14-2 
2. Mississippi River between 
Missouri and Minneapolis, MN 
(St. Louis Dist.) (Includes Melvin 
Price Locks & Dam) ................. 14-2 
3. Mississippi River between Ohio and 
Missouri Rivers, MO and IL .......... 14-2 
4. St. Louis Harbor, MO and IL.......... 14-2 
5. Navigation work under special 
authorization....................... 14-3 
Flood Control 
6. Alton to Gale Organized Levee 
Districts, IL & MO .................. 14-3 
7. Cape Girardeau-Jackson,MO.......... 14-3 
8. Coldwater Creek, MO................ 14-3 
9. East St. Louis and vicinity, IL......... 14-4 
10. Kaskaskia Island Drainage and 
Levee District, IL .................. 14-4 
11. Maline Creek, MO .................. 14-5 
12. Meramec River Basin Valley 
Park, MO.......................... 14-5 
13. Pine Ford Lake, MO................. 14-5 
14. River des Peres, MO................. 14-6 
Flood Control (cont) Page 
15. Inspection of completed flood control 
projects............................ 14-6 
16. Flood control work under special 
authorization ...................... 14-6 
17. Ecosystem restoration work under 
special authorization ................ 14-6 
Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 
18. Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark 
Twain Lake Salt River, MO ........... 14-6 
19. Upper Mississippi River Environmental 
Management Program ............... 14-7 
Tables 
Table 14-A 
Table 14-B 
Table 14-C 
Table 14-D 
Table 14-E 
Table 14-F 
Cost and Financial 
Statement................. 14-8 
Authorizing Legislation .... 14-10 
Other Authorized 
Navigation Projects ........ 14-14 
Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects........... 14-15 
Deauthorized Projects ...... 14-17 
Active General Investigations 
(96X3121)................14-18 
14-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Navigation 
1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL 
(ST. LOUIS DIST.) 
See report on Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, under 
Rock Island District. 
2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN 
MISSOURI RIVER AND 
MINNEAPOLIS, MN (ST. LOUIS 
DIST.) (INCLUDES MELVIN PRICE 
LOCKS & DAM) 
See separate section entitled "Mississippi River 
between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN," 
printed in the Annual Report of the Chief of 
Engineers. 
3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN 
OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO 
AND IL 
Location. Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, 
MN, and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 
miles and empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Portion 
included in this report embraces the 195-mile section 
known as middle Mississippi, between tributary 
Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles 
from the gulf. See folder by Corps of Engineers of 
Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi 
River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN. 
Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. The existing project provides 
for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel 
depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of 
not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional 
widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 
974 miles from gulf) to northern boundary of city of 
St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional 
width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, 
mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for 
closing secondary channels, contracting river by 
building new banks where river width is excessive 
and protecting new and old banks from erosion 
where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated 
total Federal cost (Oct 1994 price level) of 
$210,000,000; (2) by dredging to maintain project 
channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for 
Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, 
which approved a comprehensive plan for development 
of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for 
construction of a lateral canal at a cost of 
$59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixed-crest 
rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chain of Rocks 
Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at 
cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast 
Guard for aids to navigation. A small boat harbor 
opposite Chester, IL, was deauthorized and excluded 
from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th 
Cong., 3rd sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers 
dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for 
improvement of Mississippi River between Coon 
Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of 
navigation, power development, flood control, and 
needs of irrigation. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered 
adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Regulating Works: contracts continue on stone 
dike and revetment construction; as well as engineering 
bendway weir design, supervision and 
administration. Construction on existing project 
began in 1881 and project has been in beneficial 
use practically from its inception. Projects on 
Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete. Work 
on the project is about 82 percent complete. Channel 
as a whole has been greatly improved by the 
work completed to date. Dredging is required at 
low stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain 
required channel depths. River is generally 
above 10-foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter 
part of February to the latter part of August, during 
which time project channel depths generally 
prevail without dredging. During FY 1988 
through FY 1990 low water conditions (drought) 
increased maintenance dredging. To improve navigation 
depths a rock removal contract began Oct. 
1988 and was completed in July 1991. 
Maintenance. Work consists of approximately 
2,000 feet of dike repair and 5,000 feet of revetment 
repair yearly. U.S. plant and hired labor plus contract 
dredging perform channel dredging removing 
5,000,000 to 10,000,000 cubic yards of material 
(average year) from main channel. Condition and 
operation studies, recreation planning, engineering 
and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock 
and Dam 27 continued. 
4. ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO AND IL 
Location. The project area includes both sides of 
the Mississippi River from miles 138.8 to 208.8 
above the Ohio River (generally, the limits of the 
Port of Metropolitan St. Louis). 
Existing project. The project was authorized by 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 
The authorized project includes improvements in 
two areas: the North Riverfront area in Missouri 
(which is served by the St. Louis Municipal Docks) 
and the Tri-City Port area along the east bank of 
the Chain of Rocks Canal in Illinois. The principal 
project at the St. Louis Municipal Docks is an 
L-dike sediment control structure in the river to 
provide reliable water access to the dock when the 
14-2

ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT 
river is low. The principal project at the Tri-City 
Port area is a 210 ft. wide harbor along 6,900 ft. of 
the Chain of Rocks Canal. The North Riverfront 
project and half the Tri-City harbor (3.450 ft.) would 
be constructed in Phase 1, and the second half of the 
Tri-City harbor in Phase 2 approximately 10 years 
later. Estimated cost of the project (1993) is 
$13,200,000 Federal and $26,135,000 Non-Federal. 
A March 1986 Reevaluation Report described model 
tests which showed that the L-dike sediment control 
structure recommended for the St. Louis Municipal 
Docks would not be effective but that appropriate 
configuration of a new outer wall for the docks, 
referred to as the Prototype River Access Improvement 
Structure (PRAIS), would divert currents so as 
to control scour and sedimentation and maintain 
sufficient water depths for the needs of the harbor. 
Local cooperation. The District coordinated 
with the two local sponsors and found that (1) the 
city of St. Louis Port Authority supports the PRAIS 
project and (2) the Tri-City Regional Port Authority 
wants the Corps to consider the possibility of reducing 
the length of their Phase I harbor to 1,800 ft. 
and shifting its location so that it is a northern 
extension of the existing Tri-City harbor (the 
authorized project length of 6,900 ft. would be maintained 
by increasing the length of the Phase 2 harbor 
to 5,100 ft.). 
Operations and results during the fiscal 
year. In January 1992 District completed a letter 
report that documented a preliminary analysis of 
the costs and benefits of the PRAIS and the Tri-City 
harbor projects. Headquarters reviewed the letter 
report and directed that new economic studies and 
other work be accomplished and documented in a 
General Reevaluation Report with an Initial Project 
Management Plan which will describe how the 
reevaluation studies will be accomplished. Work on 
the project in FY 94 was delayed primarily due to 
district resources being directed to recovery work 
from the 1993 flood. 
5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public 
Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). 
During FY 95, $109,537 was expended on 
Batchtown; $184,522 on Calhoun Point, IL; and 
$46,409 on Cuivre, IL. 
Flood Control 
6. ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED 
LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO 
Location. The levee system is located adjacent 
to the Mississippi River between Alton and Gale, 
Illinois. 
Existing Project. The project is authorized by 
the Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1946. 
Construction of the Alton to Gale levee system was 
completed in 1977. Some reaches of this levee system 
have, for many years, been experiencing a significant 
number of slides associated with design 
deficiencies increasing the probability of levee failure 
during flood events. The recommended plan 
will correct these slides by a lime stabilization procedure. 
Estimated cost (1994) is $18,316,000 Federal 
and $3,961,000 non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. The cost sharing applicable 
for the Alton to Gale Levee Slide repairs is in accordance 
with policies established for the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, the 
Local sponsor is required to operate and maintain 
all works after completion. Supplemental assurances 
have been executed for the portion of the 
remedial work that is 100% federally funded. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Repair of levee slides in two cost-shared levee districts 
was completed. 
7. CAPE GIRARDEAU-JACKSON, MO 
Location. The project is located in Cape 
Girardeau County, Missouri, along the right bank of 
the Mississippi River between River Miles 50 and 55 
above the Ohio River. 
Existing Project. The project includes a 157 
acre dry detention reservoir; approximately one mile 
of channel improvements on Cape La Croix Creek 
and two miles of channel improvements on Walker 
Branch, eight bridge replacements; recreational/ 
environmental features and non structural features 
which are not going to be implemented at this time. 
The project is authorized by the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated 
Federal project cost (1995) is $33,300,000. Non- 
Federal cost is $12,500,000. 
Local Cooperation. The city of Cape Girardeau, 
MO, local sponsor, is strongly supportive of the project. 
The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was 
executed on May 25, 1990 with a modification to the 
LCA executed on Oct. 27, 1992. Requirements of 
local cooperation are fully described in the FY 1991 
Annual Report. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Construction continued on the Walker Branch #1 
contract which was awarded in FY 93. Contracts 
were awarded in Feb. 1995 and Aug. 1995 for the 
Walker Branch 2A and 2B channel construction. 
Design continued on the remainder of the project. 
8. COLDWATER CREEK, MO 
Location. The 47 square mile Coldwater Creek 
watershed is located in St. Louis County, Missouri, 
and had a 1980 population of 158,000 residents. 
14-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
The stream flows through Overland, Breckenridge 
Hills, and St. Ann; under Lambert-St. Louis International 
Airport; and through Hazelwood, Florissant, 
and other communities and empties into the 
Missouri River. 
Existing Project. The project was authorized by 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 and 
would afford protection to the area. About 1,400 
structures or units would be flooded by a 100-year 
flood. Significant flood damages occurred in the area 
in 1957, 1978, 1979, 1982, and 1986. The problems 
addressed by the Feasibility Study included flood 
damages, outdoor recreation needs, and environmental 
degradation. The authorized project includes 
ten miles of channel widening, five tunnels through 
a downstream railroad embankment, two small levees, 
a flood forecasting and warning system, and recreation 
features along the channel widening project. 
Estimated cost of the project (1994) is $19,200,000 
Federal and $8,365,000 Non-Federal. Because of 
radioactive material in channel sediments downstream 
from a Superfund site at Lambert Airport, 
the Corps of Engineers and the Metropolitan Sewer 
District (MSD), divided the Coldwater Creek project 
into two parts and will implement it in two phases. 
The first phase is channel widening upstream of 
Lambert Airport in St. Ann and Breckenridge Hills. 
The St. Louis Airport Authority is studying major 
expansion plans which could effect the project 
design. 
Local cooperation. The Metropolitan St. 
Louis Sewer District, in a letter dated Mar. 31, 
1995, indicated that they "cannot commit" to any 
financial responsibilities as required of the local 
sponsor. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. In 
FY 95 the project was placed in a deferred status 
and design efforts were brought to a conclusion. 
9. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL 
Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison 
Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Mississippi 
River between river miles 175 and 195 above the 
Ohio River. Project includes all bottom lands 
between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and 
Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from 
Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie 
du Pont Creek on the south. (See Corps of Engineers 
Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi 
River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) 
Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act 
authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems 
by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles 
of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together 
with necessary appurtenant works consisting of 
gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad 
closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of 
existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad 
bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service 
roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. 
Work under this authorization provides the area 
protection against a flood of about 200-year frequency. 
The completed 10 miles of levee along 
Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection 
on the landward side integral with and to the 
same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Final cost 
of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. 
The Flood Control Act of 1965 modified existing project 
to provide for channel improvements, diversion 
ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on 
Little Canteen Creek, and a pumping plant to considerably 
reduce damages resulting from interior 
flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of 
a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion 
channel to provide protection to adjacent levees 
and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Post 
authorization studies have indicated that flood plain 
detention areas, the reservoir on Little Canteen 
Creek and other related flood control measures in 
the Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area are not economically 
feasible. Also, further studies of the channel 
stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel 
have been deferred due to lack of support from 
the local sponsor of the project. Estimated total Federal 
project cost of work under this authorization is 
$33,600,000 (1985), $22,020,000 for Cahokia- 
Harding Ditch Area, and $11,580,000 for Blue 
Waters Ditch. Non-Federal cost is $20,770,000. The 
1988 Energy and Water Development Appropriations 
Act authorized repair and rehabilitation of 
pump stations and appurtenant works, channels 
and bridge structures. The estimated total cost of 
this work (1995) is $28,336,000 Federal and 
$12,292,000 Non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. For work under the Energy 
and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1988, 
PL 100-202, local interests have entered into three 
Local Cooperation Agreements (LCA) which cover 
all of the work in the Flood Protection Rehabilitation 
project. Construction work under the first LCA is 
complete, and construction work under the remaining 
two LCA's is under way. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Rehabilitation work has continued on closure structures, 
pump stations, relief wells, and Cahokia low 
dam. Contracts were awarded for additional closure 
structures and floodwall and levee work. Contracts 
are scheduled for award in the near future for 
mechanical and electrical rehabilitation at four 
small pump stations, and structural and architectural 
repairs for pump stations. 
10. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE 
AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL 
Location. In Randolph County, IL, on the right bank 
of the Mississippi River between miles 111 and 116 
above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, KY, 
14-4

ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT 
IL, MO, IN, map published by Army Map Service, 
scale 1:250,000.) 
Previous project. For details, see page 1375 of 
Annual Report for 1950. 
Existing project. Project area contains about 
9,460 acres only partially protected against flood 
stage of 38.5 feet on the Chester, IL, gage. Flooding 
occurs about once in every 7.3 years with an average 
duration of 26 days, causing substantial damage. 
The 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 519, 87th 
Cong., 2nd sess.) provides for enlarging and raising 
the existing levee about 8 feet to provide protection 
against a flood having a frequency of once in 50 
years. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is 
$14,100,000. Non- Federal cost is $2,100,000. 
Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation 
are fully described on page 14-6 of Fiscal 
Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances from 
the Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District 
were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jan. 
23, 1980. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
All construction of gravity drains, levee embankment 
and installation of wildlife plantings is complete. 
Project is complete. 
11. MALINECREEK, MO 
Location. Maline Creek is located in a small 
northern part of the City of St. Louis, portions of 
incorporated St. Louis County and all or part of 22 
municipalities. The 25 square mile Maline Creek 
watershed originates near Lambert Airport and 
flows in an easterly direction through Berkeley, Kinloch, 
Ferguson, Moline Acres, Bellefontaine Neighbors, 
and other communities and empties into the 
Mississippi River. The Maline Creek flood plain 
encompasses approximately 1600 acres of mostly 
urban development. This highly urbanized area had 
a population of 126,000 people in 1980. 
Existing project. The project was authorized by 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 
99-662) and would afford protection to the area. The 
present plan includes approximately 2.95 miles of 
channel widening, 3.35 miles of clearing, replacement 
or modification of 7 bridges, 14.4 acres of open 
space, a flood forecasting and warning plan and 2.64 
miles of recreation trails. At October 1994 price levels, 
including an allowance for inflation, estimated 
cost of the project is $7,800,000 Federal and 
$2,766,000 Non-Federal. (Authorized but not funded 
for construction.) 
Local cooperation. The Metropolitan Sewer 
District of St. Louis is the present local sponsor of 
the project. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. 
Steps were taken to place this project in a deferred 
status until the local sponsor indicates financial 
capability to proceed. 
12. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN(VALLEY 
PARK), MISSOURI 
Location. The project is located in St. Louis 
County, Missouri, adjacent to the left bank of the 
Meramec River between miles 20.7 and 22.1 above 
the confluence with the Mississippi River. 
Existing project. The project was authorized for 
construction by Section 2(h), Public Law 97-128, 
Dec. 29, 1981, and Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 and would afford partial flood protection 
to the area. The project provides for construction of 
3.2 miles of earthen levee with six gravity drains, 
three closure structures, interior ponding areas and 
33 relief wells required for under-seepage control. 
Recreational features include standard play equipment, 
multi-user courts, play field areas, picnic 
tables, comfort stations, parking areas and hiking/ 
biking trails. Estimated total project cost is 
$421,649,000; $16,147,000 Federal, and $5,622,000 
non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. The Board of Alderman for 
the City of Valley Park, Missouri, authorized the 
mayor to issue a Letter of Intent to sponsor the project. 
The letter dated Feb. 18, 1987, acknowledged 
that city officials were aware of cost sharing requirements 
and of the items of local cooperation and 
favored construction of the project. A Local Cooperation 
Agreement was executed on August 12, 1992. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. A 
Plan Formulation Report and General Design 
Memorandum was issued in March 1987. A feature 
design memorandum was approved in Dec. 1993. A 
first construction contract was awarded in Jan. 
1994. 
13. PINE FORD LAKE, MO 
Location. Proposed dam is on Big River at mile 
43.8, about 45 miles southwest of St. Louis. The Big 
River is a tributary of the Meramec. Lake would 
extend about 34 miles up Big River. (See St. Louis, 
MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published 
by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) 
Existing project. Project provides for construction 
of a compacted earth-fill dam with a concrete 
chute spillway. Dam will be 141 feet high and 2,070 
feet long. Construction of new roads, improvements 
of existing roads, alterations to pipeline, power and 
telephone lines, and construction of recreational 
facilities are included. Maximum storage capacity 
will be 285,000 acre-feet. Estimated total project 
cost (1984) is $147,000,000, of which $8,173,200 and 
$22,900,000 are local reimbursements for water supply 
and recreation and fish and wildlife respectively. 
14-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 
toward cost of project for storage allocation 
to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply 
Act of 1958. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Preconstruction planning previously funded but not 
completed. 
14. RIVER DES PERES, MISSOURI 
Location. The 111 square mile River des Peres 
watershed includes all or part of 42 municipalities 
within St. Louis County plus the city of St. Louis, 
Missouri. 
Existing project. The project was authorized by 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 and 
would afford protection to the area. The authorized 
project includes channel modifications in the Deer 
Creek and University City Branch of River des 
Peres. The Deer Creek segment of the project would 
reduce flood damages in the cities of Rock Hill, 
Brentwood, Webster Groves and Maplewood, Missouri, 
by providing channel enlargement and stabilization 
along approximately 2.5 miles of Deer Creek. 
The University City Branch segment of the project 
would reduce flood damages in the city of University 
City, Missouri, by providing channel enlargement 
and bank stabilization. The authorized project also 
includes: flood proofing along the Kirkwood Branch 
of Gravois Creek; a flood forecasting/warning plan; 
and complementary outdoor recreation features. At 
October 1993 price levels, the estimated cost of the 
project is $17,800,000 Federal and $6,229,000 
Non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. The Metropolitan St. Louis 
Sewer District (MSD) is the local sponsor. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. 
The Preconstruction Engineering Design (PED) 
work was initiated in FY 89 and has been put into a 
deferred status until such time as the local sponsor 
will be able to finance initiation of this project. It is 
currently unclear as to when the sponsor will be able 
to meet the non-Federal share of costs. 
15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Inspection of completed work was accomplished at 
a cost of $415,166 for the Fiscal Year 1995. Total 
cost as of end of fiscal year is $9,194,813. 
16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, 
Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended 
(preauthorization). 
Preauthorization study costs for Fiscal Year 1995 
were $516,194 for St. Peters, MO; $34,145 for Modoc 
L&D District, Prairie, IL; $3,622 for Prairie Dupont 
L&SD; and $5,185 for Wood River D&LD, IL. 
Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant 
to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as 
amended. 
During FY 1995, $2,071 was expended on Len 
Small L&DD, Alexandria, IL; $215 for North Fork 
Salt River; $958 for Parkway School District; 
$32,197 for South Senior High School; $3,371 for 
Fayette County Highway 23; $14,866 for Lincoln 
City Road 729; $5,442 for Lincoln County Road 725; 
$53,591 for McKelvey School; $6,627 for Lincoln City 
Road 528; and $1,060 for Lincoln County Road. 
Emergency flood control activities--repair, 
flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 
84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). 
Federal costs for the fiscal year were $283,746 for 
Disaster Preparedness, $2,018,310 for Emergency 
Operations, and $18,059,500 for Rehabilitation. 
17. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION 
WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
Project Modifications for improvement of 
environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 
99-662, as amended (preauthorization). 
During this period $20,934 was expended on 
Lower Cache River; $291 on Mississippi River Levees; 
$5,463 on Habitat Rest. Boise Brule; $339 on 
Illinois River Levees; and $262,634 on Carlyle Lake 
Wildlife Management. 
Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 
18. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND 
RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO 
Location. Salt River rises in Schuyler County, 
about 12 miles south of Missouri-Iowa State line. It 
flows southeasterly about 192 miles and empties 
into Mississippi River about 2 miles above Louisiana, 
MO, or about 284 miles above mouth of Ohio 
River. (See Kansas City and Quincy sheets of maps 
of United States published by Army Map Service, 
scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle 
maps, 1:250,000.) 
Previous project. For details, see page 645 of 
Annual Report for 1968. 
Existing project. Project provides for construction 
of a multiple-purpose reservoir, including 
power, flood control, water supply, navigation storage, 
pollution abatement, fish and wildlife conservation, 
and recreation. Dam consists of a compacted 
earth embankment with a concrete spillway controlled 
by tainter gates. Dam and spillway are about 
14-6

ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT 
1,700 feet long. Spillway structure consists of an 
ogee overflow section surmounted by four 50- by 
30-foot tainter gates. Reservoir will have a storage 
capacity of 1,428,000 acre-feet for use of flood control, 
future domestic and industrial water supply, 
sediment storage, and power generation. Project 
plan provides for installation of one 27,000 KW conventional 
unit and one 31,000 KW reversible unit for 
pumped storage operations. Total Federal project 
cost estimate (1984) is $330,000,000 of which 
$22,420,000 is for lands and damages; $14,300,000 for 
water supply; $76,000,000 for hydropower. 
Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation 
are fully described on page 14-13 of Fiscal 
Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurances have been 
received from the state of Missouri and approved by 
the Chief of Engineers. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Work is complete on all major items. Lands 
acquired to date are 55,277 acres in fee and 10,068 
acres in easements. Project is essentially complete. 
19. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER 
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
PROGRAM 
Location. The portion of the Upper Mississippi 
River within the boundaries of the St. Louis District 
extends from the mouth of the Ohio River (river mile 
0) to river mile 300, downstream of Lock and 
Dam 22. 
Existing project. The project is composed of five 
elements: Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement 
Projects, Long-term Resource Monitoring, Recreation 
Projects, Studies of Recreation Impacts and 
Navigation Traffic Monitoring. (The St. Louis District's 
involvement has been limited to Habitat 
Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects and Long 
Term Resource Monitoring.) The overall program, 
involving five states, three engineer districts and 
two Corps of Engineers Divisions, is administered by 
the North Central Division. In the St. Louis District, 
three habitat rehabilitation projects have been 
constructed. These are Clarksville Management 
Area, Missouri, Dresser Island, Missouri, and 
Pharrs Island, Missouri. All projects are being operated 
and maintained by the state of Missouri. 
Through FY 1995, funds allocated to the St. Louis 
District have amounted to $14,470,000 for design 
and construction of Habitat Rehabilitation and 
Enhancement Projects (HREP), $851,000 for Long 
Term Resource Monitoring (LTRM) and $1,069,000 
for Program Management. The authorization limit 
for the overall program projected over a 10-year 
period is $191,415,000. 
Local cooperation. The terms of local cooperation, 
as established by Public Law 99-662, will vary 
according to the nature of the project, land ownership 
and pre-existing management responsibilities. 
The Local Sponsor for Habitat Rehabilitation and 
Enhancement projects is usually the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service in coordination with the state of 
Missouri or the state of Illinois. 
Operations and results during the fiscal 
year. During FY 1995 construction activities proceeded 
on all three construction contracts for the 
Stump Lake project (although some delays were 
encountered due to flooding); two construction contracts 
for the Swan Lake, Illinois, project were 
advertised and awarded; the Cuivre Island, Missouri 
project was approved for initiation of Plans and 
Specifications and Plans and Specifications were 
initiated; the final Definite Project Report was completed 
for the Calhoun Point, Illinois, project; and 
the draft Definite Project Report was completed for 
the Batchtown, Illinois, project. Habitat and biological 
response monitoring activities continued at the 
Dresser Island, Missouri, Clarksville Refuge, Missouri, 
and Pharrs Island, Missouri, projects. 
14-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Funds 
Section to Sep. 30, 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 96 1995 
3. Mississippi River 
Between Ohio and 
Missouri Rivers 
(Includes Chain 
of Rocks) 
4. Southeast 
Missouri Port, 
MO 
(Contrib. Funds) 
6. Alton to Gale 
Organized Levee 
Districts, IL & 
MO 
7. Cape Girardeau 
Jackson, MO 
(Contrib. Funds) 
9. East St. Louis 
and Vicinity, IL 
(Contrib. Funds) 
10. Kaskaskia Island 
Drainage & Levee 
District, IL 
12. Meramee R. Basin 
Valley Park, MO 
(Contrib. Funds) 
13. Pine Ford 
Lake, MO 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
$5,949,000 5,244,000 4,666,000 7,087,000 $240,197,6001 
4,233,884 5,104,933 3,944,585 9,262,508 239,489,1621 
10,480,600 8,300,000 9,559,523 13,089,626 340,181,9792 
8,932,078 7,042,810 12,287,956 13,060,229 339,873,9802 
76,000 137,000 247,257 
75,777 125,279 244,186 
0 
5,600 
-11,045 
-6,825 
40,362 
55,439
00 
927,022 
927,011 
1,868,060 
1,868,060 
1,235,000 280,000 231,000 -294,000 8,688,000 
1,208,634 117,302 178,757 115,154 8,687,134 
5,149,000 4,847,000 6,700,000 1,400,000 21,012,000 
6,327,460 2,538,776 5,232,639 4,376,843 19,979,191 
831,200 409,700 
774,685 408,111 
39,737 233,860 1,965,697 
259,576 213,401 1,866,519 
1,999,000 2,349,000 7,660,000 2,451,000 35,730,3263 
1,815,004 1,860,154 4,709,554 5,914,756 35,440,0624 
510,000 1,420,000 2,238,000 1,382,000 5,647,600 
409,999 463,763 2,854,353 1,473,320 5,287,135 
00
0
0 
16,188,000 
16,188,000 
650,000 1,303,000 2,940,000 -257,000 5,092,000 
664,921 772,718 672,181 1,898,392 4,400,819 
00 
00 
00 
247,100 115,000 
246,399 21,285 
00 
00 
362,100 
267,684 
3,644,000 
3,644,000 
14-8

ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT 
TABLE 14-A 
(Continued) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Funds 
Section to Sep. 3), 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 96 1995 
18. Clarence Cannon New Work 
Dam and Approp. 141,000 300,000 -36,900 0 313,180,1285 
Reservoir, Salt Cost 129,094 155,335 176,253 2,224 313,180,1295 
River, MO 
Maint. 
Approp. 4,807,600 5,730,600 4,500,778 5,697,404 59,393,910 
Cost 4,653,410 4,627,614 5,945,803 5,759,163 59,339,832 
(Contrib. Funds) New Work 
Approp. 0 80,403 101,600 523,696 705,699 
Cost 0 0 16,772 0 16,772 
1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. 
Excludes previous project cost of $1,416,620. 
In addition $3,109 was expended for rehabilitation. 
Includes $8,072,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 
Includes $7,921,939 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 
Includes $216,628 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. 
14-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorised Documents 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Jun. 3, 1896 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Mar. 3, 19051 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Sep. 3, 19542 
Jul. 3, 19583 
Oct. 21, 1978 
Dec. 29, 1981 
Aug. 15, 1985 
and Nov. 17, 
1986 
Nov. 28, 1990 
Oct. 31, 1992 
KASKASKIA RIVER, IL 
Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation 
channel from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI 
RIVERS (See Section 3 of Text) 
Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum 
depth of 8 feet.) 
Dredging introduced as part of the project. 
These acts practically abrogated that part of project for 
middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. 
Regulating works restored to project and appropriations 
begun with a view to completion of improvement between 
Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated 
cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously 
expended. 
For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern 
Rivers and Harbors boundary of city of St. Louis. 
Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton 
(mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 
9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional 
width around bends. 
Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock 
at Chain of Rocks. 
Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor 
opposite Chester, IL. 
Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 
900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. 
MELVIN PRICE LOCKS & DAM (FORMERLY LOCK 
AND DAM NO.26 (REPLACEMENT)) 
Construct new dam and a 1,200-foot lock approximately 
2 miles downstream of the existing structure. 
Change name from "Lock and Dam No. 26" to "Melvin Price 
Lock and Dam" upon termination of service in 
U.S. Congress. 
Construct a second lock, 600 feet long at the Lock and Dam 
No. 26. (Replacement) Project. 
Modified to provide construction of cost-shared recreation 
facilities within the state of Illinois 
Modified to allow cost-shared recreation with "other 
non-Federal interests and authorized a 24,000 square foot 
visitor center. 
S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Annual Report, 1881, 
p. 1536. 
Committee Doc. 9, 
69th Cong., 2d sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 12, 
70th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 231, 
76th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 230, 
83d Cong., 1st sess. 
Public Law 95-502, 
95th Cong. 
Public Law 97-118, 
97th Cong. 
Public Law 99-88 and 
Public Law 99-662, 
99th Cong. 
Public Law 101-640, 
101st Cong. 
Public Law 102-580, 
102nd Cong. 
1960 River and 
Harbor Act as 
amended. 
Section 107 
SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO 
Construct harbor channel with adjacent landfill. 
14-10

ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT 
TABLE 14-B 
(CONTINUED) 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Nov. 26, 1986 
Jun. 22, 1936 
Jun. 28, 1938 
1946 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 28, 1990 
Jun. 22, 1936 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Oct. 22, 1976 
Dec. 22, 1987 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Oct. 23, 1962 
ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO & IL (See Section 4 of Text) 
As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
dated Apr. 30, 1984, the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 authorizes navigation 
improvements. 
ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, 
IL & MO (See Section 6 of Text) 
Authorized construction of levees to protect area from 
flooding from the Mississippi River. 
CAPE GIRARDEAU, JACKSON METROPOLITAN 
AREA, MO (See Section 7 of Text) 
As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
Dec. 8, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
authorizes flood control and related recreational 
improvements in the Cape La Croix Creek Watershed. 
COLDWATER CREEK, MO (See Section 8 of Text) 
As outlined in the report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
Aug 9, 1988, the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
authorizes flood control. 
EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL (See Section 9 
of Text) 
Raise and enlarge existing levee. 
Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce 
interior flooding. 
Construct Blue Waters Ditch as independent section. 
Repair and rehabilitate pump stations and appurtenant 
works, channels, and bridges. 
ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE 
DISTRICT, IL 
Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. 
HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL 
Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. 
HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL 
Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. 
KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE 
DISTRICT, IL (See Section 10 of Text) 
Raise and enlarge existing levee. 
Public Law 99-662 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Special report on 
record in OCE 
Flood Control 
Committee Doc. 1, 
75th Cong., 1st sess. 
Public Law 99-662, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Public Law 101-640 
101st Cong. 
Special report on 
record in OCE. 
H. Doc 329, 
88th Cong., 2d sess. 
Public Law 94-587, 
94th Cong. 
Public Law 100-202, 
100th Cong. 
H. Doc. 472, 
87th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 472, 
87th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 472, 
87th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 519, 
87th Cong., 2d sess. 
14-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 14.B 
(CONTINUED) 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Jul. 14, 1984 
Jun. 28, 1938 
Nov. 7, 1966 
Dec. 29, 1981 
Nov. 28, 1990 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Nov. 17, 1986 
MALINE CREEK, MO (See Section 11 of Text) 
As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
Nov. 2, 1982, the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 authorizes flood control, recreation, and environmental 
improvements. 
MAUVAISE TERRE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE 
DISTRICT, IL 
Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. 
MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO (See Section 12 of Text) 
Construct reservoirs and local protection project. 
Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 dams and 
19 Angler-use sites. (See Section 13 of Text) 
Undertake structural and nonstructural flood control 
measures. 
RIVER DES PERES, MO (See Section 14 of Text) 
As outlined in the report of the Chief Engineers 
dated May 23, 1989, the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1990 authorizes flood control. 
MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL 
Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to 
reduce flooding. 
MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE 
AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL 
Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. 
NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL 
Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. 
REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL 
Construct dam at Benton, IL, and subimpoundment dams on 
upper arms of reservoir. 
STE. GENEVIEVE, MO 
As outlined in the Report of the Board of Engineers for 
Rivers and Harbors dated Apr. 16, 1985, the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes construction 
of a levee and a pumping plant to protect the city from 
Mississippi River and Gabouri Creek floods. 
Public Law 99-662, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Energy and Water 
Development Approp. 
Act of 1985, 
98th Cong., 2nd sess. 
Flood Control 
Committee, Doc. 1, 
75th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 525, 
89th Cong., 2d sess. 
Public Law 97-128, 
97th Cong. Amended 
Section 1128, 
Public Law 99-662, 
99th Cong. 
Public Law 101-640 
101st Cong. 
H. Doc. 472, 
87th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 472, 
87th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 472, 
87th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc 541, 
87th Cong., 2d sess. 
Public Law 99-662, 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
14-12

ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT 
TABLE 14-B 
(CONTINUED) 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL 
Jun. 28, 1938 Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. Flood Control 
Committee Doc. 1, 
75th Cong., 1st sess. 
CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT 
RIVER, MO (See Section 18 of Text) 
Oct. 23, 1962 Modified act of Jun. 28, 1938 by deleting the reservoir H. Doc. 507, 
therefrom and reauthorizing it as a separate multiple- 87th Cong., 2d sess. 
purpose project. 
Oct. 27, 1965 Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to present Public Law 89-298, 
designation. 89th Cong. 
1. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. 
2. Inactive. 
3. All work completed. 
14-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1905 
TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
Cost to Sep. 1995 
For Last 
PFull Report Operation 
See Annual and Mo. and Yr. 
Project Report For. Construction Maintenance Completed 
Cuivre River, MO1 1883 $ 12,000 $ - -- 
Moccasin Springs, MO 1969 76,4362 - -- 
Southeast Missouri Port, MO 1993 3,466,522 871,572 Apr. 89 
Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, 
Meredosia, and Valley City, IL 1961 2,653,194 1961 -- 
1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 23, 1900. 
2. Excludes $56,605 contributed funds. 
14-14

ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT 
TABLE 14-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS
Cost to Sep. 1995 
For Last 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual and Mo. and Yr. 
Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed 
Cache River Diversion, IL 
Cape Girardeau, MO, No. 2 
Carlyle Lake, IL 
Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage 
and Levee District, IL 
Columbia Drainage and Levee 
District No. 3, IL 
Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and 
Drainage District, IL 
Dively Drainage & Levee District, IL 
Emergency bank protection for certain 
highway and railroad facilities at Price 
Landing, MO (see Flood Control 
Act of 1944)1 
Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, 
Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood 
fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood 
Control Act of 1941, as amended)1 
Emergency protection for certain highway 
and railroad facilities at Chester, IL, 
bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) 
Emergency protection for Illinois approach, 
Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood 
Control Act of 1944) 
Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage 
District No. 5, IL 
Grand Tower Drainage and 
Levee District, IL 
Harrisonville Levee and 
Drainage District, IL 
Kaskaskia Island Drainage and 
Levee District, IL 
Kaskaskia River, IL2 
Lake Shelbyville, IL 
Mauvaise Terre Drainage 
and Levee District, IL 
McGee Creek Drainage 
and Levee District, IL 
Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage 
and Levee District, IL 
Miller Pond Drainage District, IL 
Mississippi River Agricultural 
Area 8, MO 
Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO 
Mississippi River Agricultural Area 
No. 12, MO 
Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL, 
underseepage measures 
North Alexander Drainage and 
Levee District, IL 
1953 
1965 
1981 
1955 
1981 
1959 
1976 
71,068,400 
2,837,114 
5,157,805 
42,819,400 
185,700 
2,818,000 
5,889,500 
1,720,000 
1953 
1964 
Oct. 1976 
1955 
Aug. 1981 
1950 
1959 
1976 
55,415 Oct. 1949 
1951 
50,000 
25,000 
Jan. 1952 
Aug. 1945 
1958 
1959 
Mar. 1981 
1949 
1988 
Sep. 1978 
1953 
1952 
1946 
1970 
1959 
1981 
1959 
1989 
1981 
1989 
1989 
1944 
1955 
1987 
1980 
1967 
1957 
1,154,800 
4,677,900 
6,829,069 
297,460 
147,387,000 
44,000,000 
589,000 
25,043,300 
249,738 
164,183 
2,137,000 
79,265,166 
22,422,116 
75,212,748 
1988 
1989 
1944 
1955 
Jan. 1980 
85,422 Oct. 1962 
939,569 
14-15 
1957

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 14-D 
(Continued) 
OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS
Cost to Sep. 1995 
For Last 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual and Mo. and Yr. 
Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed 
Nutwood Drainage and 
Levee District, IL 1989 670,000 -- 1984 
Perry County Drainage and Levee3 
District Nos. 1, 2, and 3, MO 1987 7,968,700 -- 1986 
Prairie du Pont Levee and 
Sanitary District, IL4 1970 6,005,127 -- 1970 
Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, IL 1959 3,882,600 -- 1959 
Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 1,866,910 -- 1959 
Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL5 ,6 1989 43,700,900 55,601,775 1988 
Strington, Ft. Chartres, and Ivy 
Landing, IL 1957 2,123,700 -- Aug. 1956 
Urban areas at Alton, IL 1960 192,000 -- -- 
Village of New Athens, IL 1981 1,983,000 -- Sep. 1981 
Valley City Drainage & Levee District, IL7 1967 91,952 -- 1967 
Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL8 1989 17,163,821 -- 1988 
1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. 
Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. 
Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. 
Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. 
Excludes $550,000 Area Development Administration Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs 
of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds 
allotted to the Corps. 
Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended). 
Funds are for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. 
14-16

ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT 
TABLE 14-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Date Federal Contrib 
See Annual And Funds Funds 
Project Report For Authority Extended Exp 
Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO 
Big Swan D&L District Illinois River, IL 
Cape Girardeau, MO Reaches Nos 1, 3, and 4 
Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 
East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek D&L 
District, IL 
Eldred, IL 
Fort Chartres & Ivy Landing D&L District No. 5 
and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District 
No. 4, IL 
Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL 
1-38 Lake, MO 
1967 
1959 
1964 
1963 
1962 
1971 
19621 
Indian Creek Area Illinois River, IL 
Irondale Lake, MO 
Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, 
IL, Nos. 2, 5, 6 and 7 
Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, 
IL Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10 and 13 
Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, IL 
Meramec Park Lake, MO 
Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO 
Mississippi River at Alton, IL 
Small Boat Harbor 
Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Richland Creek, IL 
Riverland Levee District, MO 
Scott County D&L District Illinois River, IL 
Small Boat Harbor opposite 
Chester, IL 
Small Boat Harbor opposite 
Hamburg, IL 
Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District 
No. 1, MO 
St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District 
No. 1, MO 
Union Lake, MO 
Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee 
District, MO 
1979 
1979 
1978 
1967 
19581 
1959 
1969 
1936 
19541 
19501 
1936 
1936 
1979 
1936 
Oct 86 
Oct 86 
Oct 78 
PL100-676 
Jan 90 
PL100-676 
Jan 90 
Nov 79 
Oct 86 
Nov 77 
PL100-676 
1 Jan 1990 
Nov 81 
PL100-676 
1 Jan 1990 
Oct 86 
Nov 79 
Nov 79 
Oct 78 
Dec 81 
Nov 79 
Nov 77 
PL100-676 
1 Jan 1990 
PL100-676 
10 Aug 89 
Aug 77 
Oct 86 
Nov 77 
Nov 77 
Nov 77 
Nov 77 
Jan 90 
Nov 77 
1 Year authorized. 
14-17 
N 
$ 22,000 
4,984,500 
1,920,600 
496,000 
37,682,514 
-- 
1,866,910 
401,000 
4,931,154

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 14-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
(96X3121) 
Federal Cost Totals by 
Item and CWIS Number FY 95 Categories 
SURVEYS (Category 100) 
Navigation Studies (110) 
Miss. River, Vicinity St. Louis-10400 
Subtotal 
Flood Damage Prevention Studies(120) 
St. Louis Region, MO-13246 
Alexander and Pulaski Counties, IL-12217 
Kaskaskia River Basin, IL-99192 
St. Louis Metropolitan Area, MO and IL-55040 
Flood Plain Management Upper Miss-13245 
Subtotal 
Special Studies (140) 
Environmental Ser. Partnership-14190 
Subtotal 
Miscellaneous Activities(170) 
Dam Safety Criteria Studies-14713 
Review of FERC Licenses-53857 
Special Investigations-17250 
Waterfowl Management Plan-53904 
Subtotal 
Coordination Studies with Other Agencies(180) 
Madison County-17007 
St. Claire-17008 
Planning Assit to State-MO 
Subtotal 
TOTAL (Category 100) 
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) 
Flood Plain Management Services (250)-82030, and -82040 
Hydrology Studies (260)-53820 
TOTAL (Category 200) 
ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) 
Coldwater Creek, MO-12252 
Maline Creek, MO-12297 
Nutwood D&LD 
River Des Peres, MO-12638 
St. Louis Harbor, MO & IL-10184 
Ste. Genevieve, MO-75453 
TOTAL (Category 600) 
GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
14-18 
$31,234 
31,234 
840,813 
$179,716 
341
4 
413,859 
1,434,733 
982 
982 
55,874 
3,472 
15,403 
13,209 
87,958 
54 
5,357 
675 
6,086 
$1,560,993 
106,728 
96,419 
203,147 
50,207 
587 
381 
11,670 
25,845 
1,661,940 
1,750,630 
$3,514,770

NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT *
This district comprises portions of southern western portion, and embraces drainage basins of 
Kentucky, southwestern Virginia, western North Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers and their tribu- 
Carolina, northern Georgia and Alabama, northeastern taries. 
Mississippi and practically all of Tennessee except 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. Cumberland River, TN and KY.....................15-2 
2. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY.................15-3 
3. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL 
and M S .......................................................... 15-3 
4. Navigation Work Under Special 
Authorization ............................................... 15-4 
Alteration of Bridges 
5. Authorized Alteration of Bridges .................. 15-4 
Flood Control 
6. Big South Fork National River and 
Recreation Area, KY and TN......................15-4 
7. Martins Fork Lake, KY ................................. 15-4 
8. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY ..15-5 
9. Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy 
River and Cumberland River, W VA, 
VA and KY .......................................... .......... 15-5 
10. Ohio River Basin (Nashville Dist.)................15-5 
11. Inspection of completed flood control 
projects ..................... ...................... . 15-5 
12. Flood control work under special 
authorization..................................................15-6 
Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 
13. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN ....... 15-6 
14. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, 
TN and KY ..................................................... 15-6 
15. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio 
River Basin, TN ............................................. 15-6 
16. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY.....15-7 
17. Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland, Ohio 
River Basin, KY ............................................. 15-7 
Dam Safety Program............................................15-7 
Tables Page 
Table 15-A Cost & Financial Statement............15-9 
Table 15-B Authorizing Legislation..................15-11 
Table 15-C Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects............................................ 15-13 
Table 15-D Not Applicable.......................................... 
Table 15-E Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects ............................................ 15-13 
Table 15-F Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose 
Projects, Including Power...............15-14 
Table 15-G Deauthorized Projects .................... 15-14 
Table 15-H Cumberland River, TN & KY, 
Principal Features .......................... 15-15 
Table 15-I Tennessee River Lock Dimensions .15-16 
Table 15-J Tennessee River Total Cost of 
Existing Project...............................15-17 
Table 15-K Ohio River Basin (Nashville 
District) Local Protection ............... 15-17 
Table 15-L Reservoirs........................................15-17 
Table 15-M Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects .............................. 15-18 
Table 15-N Flood Control Work Under Special 
Authorization .................................. 15-18 
General Investigations 
19. Surveys............................................................15-8 
20. Collection and study of basic data ................ 15-8 
21. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .... 15-8 
15-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1995 
Navigation 
L CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY 
Location. Formed by junction of Poor and Clover 
Forks in Harlan County, KY, about 694.2 miles above 
its mouth, and flows west to Burnside, KY, from 
whence it makes a loop southwestward into Tennessee, 
passes Nashville, and returns northwestward to 
Kentucky, emptying into Ohio River near Smithland, 
KY (See Geological Survey base maps of Tennessee and 
Kentucky.) 
Previous projects. For details see pages 1898 and 
1901 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1208 of 
Annual Report for 1938, and pages 1069 and 1070 of 
Annual Report for 1962. 
Existing project. Below Nashville: Improvement 
of Cumberland River between mouth and Nashville 
was authorized for 9-foot navigation; increased project 
depth to be obtained by construction of three moderate 
height dams with lockage facilities, designated as 
Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham, to replace 
existing locks A to F inclusive below Nashville and lock 
1 above Nashville. (See table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Subsequent authorities provide for construction 
of hydroelectric power-generating facilities at 
Cheatham Dam, rivermile 148.7, and modification of 
project for navigation on Cumberland River, TN and 
KY, to provide, in lieu of previously authorized works 
at Kuttawa, mile 32.2, and Dover, mile 100.1, for construction 
of a multiple-purpose improvement consisting 
of a dam, lock, and powerplant near mile 30.6 on lower 
Cumberland River and a canal for navigation and other 
purposes connecting this reservoir with reservoir 
formed by Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The 
project is known as Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley. 
Provision of interconnecting canal, involving excavation 
of a channel through narrow watershed divide 
about 2.5 miles upstream from damsite, permits alternatives 
routes available for navigation between either 
Cumberland or Tennessee Rivers and Ohio River, and 
affords integrated operation of Barkley and Kentucky 
Reservoirs through diversion of flows in interests of 
flood control and power production. Cost of modified 
project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose 
development is $178,181,406 Federal funds and 
$102,966 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities 
under the completed projects program. (See table 15-H 
for listing of principal features.) 
Under flood conditions as regulated by upstream 
reservoirs, extreme fluctuation in stage of river below 
Nashville, TN, varies at different localities from about 
16 to 55 feet above minimum pool levels. Ordinary 
fluctuations vary with power flows from as much as the 
allowable 3-foot drawdown below normal pool elevation 
385 at Cheatham Lock and Dam to a range of about 7 
feet at Nashville. Seasonal variation in normal headwater 
levels at Lake Barkley is 5 feet, which in combination 
with power flows produces fluctuations up to 10 
feet below Cheatham Lock and Dam. 
Above Nashville: See pages 1693 thru 1696 of 
Annual Report for 1950 for information including statistical 
data on locks and dams 1 to 17 and 21. 
Completion information is shown on pages 1454 of the 
report for 1951. See Table 15-B for Authorizing 
Legislation. Construction of Old Hickory, Carthage, 
and Celina Dams above Nashville was also authorized 
for navigation and power. The dam and reservoir 
authorized for construction on Cumberland River near 
Carthage, TN, has been redesignated as Cordell Hull 
Dam and Reservoir. Cost of Old Hickory and Cordell 
Hull projects, including locks, is $132,140,900. 
Estimated cost of Celina Dam (1985) is $213,000,000. 
(See table 15-H at end of chapter for listing of principal 
features.) 
Under flood conditions as presently regulated, 
including effect of surcharge operation of Old Hickory 
project, extreme fluctuations of stage in this section of 
river vary from a range of 35 feet at Nashville (mile 
191) to a maximum of 46 feet immediately below Old 
Hickory Dam (mile 216.2), and from an 8-foot variation 
in headwater at dam to 36 feet in vicinity of Carthage, 
TN, (mile 313.5), present head of navigation; with variations 
up to 35 feet at Celina, TN (mile 380.8) and 29 
feet in tail water at Wolf Creek Dam (mile 460.9). 
Maximum fluctuations under ordinary conditions from 
power flows vary from about 7 feet at Nashville to 14 
and 3 feet, respectively, in tailwater and headwater of 
Old Hickory Dam, and at other key points as follows: 
13 feet at Carthage; 18 feet at Celina; and 19 feet at 
Wolf Creek Dam. 
Further details on project authorization for river 
sections below and above Nashville as shown on Table 
15-B. 
Local cooperation. Under modified project for 9- 
foot navigation and multiple-purpose development, 
recreation features of reservoir components are subject 
to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under 
Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. 
Terminal facilities. There are 42 terminals on the 
Cumberland River (5 Municipally owned and open for 
public use; 5 government owned facilities and 32 privately 
owned facilities). A total of 18 terminals have 
railroad connections. Principal commodities handled 
are petroleum products, stone, sands, gravel, coal, 
coke, iron, steel, chemicals and grain. Facilities considered 
adequate for existing commerce. For further information 
see page 695 of Annual Report for 1969. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Barkley, Cheatham, Cordell Hull, 
and Old Hickory locks and dams were operated as 
required. Operation and Maintenance improvements 
included repairs to lock operations buildings at 
Barkley, Cheatham and Old Hickory Locks, rewedging 
generator windings at Barkley Power Plant, and purchase 
of a replacement tow haulage unit at Barkley 
Lock. A contract was awarded for replacement of the 
alarm system at Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old 
15-2

NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT 
Hickory Power Plants. Approximately 4,3000 cubic 
yards of material was removed by hired labor channel 
maintenance dredging on the Cumberland River. An 
estimated 15 million tons of commodities wer locked 
through the Cumberland River locks. Commercial 
lockages were approximately 3,300 and 6,400 recreational 
craft were also locked through. 
Total net energy generated at Barkley Dam 
(648,273,321kw-hr) was made available through 
Department of the Interior to the Tennessee Valley 
Authority. Southern Illinois power Cooperative, Big 
Rivers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation, and 
Indianan a Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc, 
Hosier energy Division. Total net energy generated at 
Cheatham Dam (187,844,015 kw-hr), Cordell Hull 
(348,043,169 kw-hr), and Old Hickory (460,201,970 kwhr) 
was made available for distribution. Activities 
under reservoir management program comprising 
malaria control, shoreline sanitation, land management 
and disposal, and maintenance of public-use facilities 
continued. 
2. TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL AND KY 
Location. Formed by junction of French Broad and 
Holston Rivers in eastern Tennessee, 4.4 miles above 
Gay Street Bridge at Knoxville, flows southwest into 
northern Alabama, thence in a generally westerly 
course across north Alabama, to northeast boundary of 
Mississippi, thence nearly due north across Tennessee 
and Kentucky, entering Ohio River at Paducah, 652.1 
miles from junction of French Broad and Holston 
Rivers. (See Geological survey base map of Tennessee 
River Basin.) 
Previous projects. For details see pages 1902- 
1906, Annual Report for 1915; pages 1190-1194, 1196- 
1216, and 1220-1222, Annual Report for 1929; and 
page 1216, Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project. Originally provided for permanent 
improvement of river for a navigable depth of 9 
feet at low water from mouth about 650 miles to 
Knoxville, TN. Only work performed by the Corps was 
construction of lock at General Joe Wheeler Dam and 
miscellaneous appurtenant improvements at a new 
work cost of $2,244,236. Tennessee Valley Authority 
program provided for obtaining authorized 9-foot project 
by construction of high dams and locks and utilization 
of certain locks and dams previously constructed 
under jurisdiction of the Corps. (See Table 15-B for 
Authorizing Legislation.) Subsequent construction by 
the TVA of Melton Hill Dam extends navigable channel 
of Tennessee River system up the Clinch River about 
38 miles above damsite (mile 23.1) to vicinity of 
Clinton, TN. (See table 15-I on Tennessee River.) 
In accordance with general navigation laws placing 
control and supervision over navigable waters under 
direction of Secretary of the Army, the Corps of 
Engineers operates and maintains all locks, and maintains 
navigation channels and safety harbors by performing 
all necessary maintenance dredging and snagging 
operations. For information concerning other 
functions of the Corps under division of responsibilities 
for Tennessee River since adoption of Tennessee Valley 
Authority Act of 1933, see page 1084 of Annual Report 
for 1962. 
Local cooperation. Authorization requires no local 
cooperation in construction of alternate system of low 
dams. It does, however, provide that if high dams are 
built before the United States builds projected locks 
and low dams which are to be replaced, the United 
States shall contribute to cost of substituted structures 
an amount equal to estimated cost of works of navigation 
for which substitution is made. 
Terminal facilities. There are 150 terminals on 
the Tennessee River (13 municipally owned, 15 government 
owned facilities and 122 privately owned facilities). 
A total of 79 terminals have railroad connections. 
Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, 
stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, grain, chemicals, iron, 
and steel. Facilities considered adequate for existing 
commerce. A list of terminals is revised annually and 
can be obtained from Division Engineer, Ohio River 
Division, Corps of Engineers, Cincinnati, Ohio. For 
further information see page 698 of Annual Report for 
1969. 
Operations during fiscal year. Channel work by 
government plant and hired labor consisted of dredging 
and snagging at various locations, and maintenance of 
mooring facilities and safety harbors. Cost of channel 
maintenance was $1,144,891. Maintenance: All locks 
were operated and lock appurtenances and standby 
plant maintained as required. Major maintenance 
included dewatering and repairs to Watts Bar and 
Wheeler Auxiliary Locks, additional painting of miscellaneous 
metals at Fort Loudoun, Melton Hill, Watts 
Bar, Wheeler, Guntersville, Nickajack and 
Chickamauga Locks, installation of replacement culvert 
valves at Chickamauga, Watts Bar and Fort 
Loudoun Locks, instllation of replacement gate 
machinery at Wheeler Auxiliary, purchase of elecrical 
control system for replacement at Wilson Main Lock, 
and replacement of a mooring cell at Tennessee River 
Mile 259.9. Approximately 210,000 cubic yards of 
materials was removed by hired labor channel maintenance 
dredging on the Tennessee River and tributaries. 
An estimated 50 million tons of commodities were 
locked through the Tennessee River Locks. 
Commerical locakges were approximately 3,3000 and 
6,400 recreational craft were also locked through. 
3. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE 
WATERWAY, AL AND MS 
Location. West Central Alabama and Northeastern 
Mississippi; in Marengo, Sumter, Greene and Pickens 
Counties, Alabama, and Noxubee, Lowndes, Clay, 
Monroe, Itawamba, Prentiss and Tishomingo Counties, 
Mississippi. 
15-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1995 
Existing project. Provides for a waterway 234 
miles in length, connecting the Tombigbee and 
Tennessee Rivers by way of the East Fork of 
Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks, affording 
a channel not less than 9 feet deep and 280 feet in 
bottom width, with 10 locks each having clear chamber 
dimensions of 110 x 600 feet. Construction for the 
divide section, including Bay Springs lock and dam, is 
assigned to the Nashville District; whereas, the prosecution 
of work on the river and canal sections is under 
the jurisdiction of the Mobile District. Only activities 
of the Nashville District are reported herein. 
Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction 
of the Nashville District is $751,000,000. (See 15-B for 
authorizing legislation). 
Local cooperation. Authorization requires local 
interests to construct, maintain and operate all highway 
bridges, construct and maintain all highway relocations 
or alterations, make and maintain alterations 
as required to sewer, water supply and drainage facilities, 
assume cost of operation and maintenance of utility 
crossings, provide and maintain as required suitable 
and adequate river and canal terminals in accordance 
with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army and 
the Chief of Engineers. 
Operations during fiscal year. The Mobile 
District is responsible for operation and maintenance 
of the entire Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. The 
project is 100% complete. 
4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public 
Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). 
During the period $391,706 was expended for a construction 
of an access channel to Port of Florence, Al. 
Alteration of Bridges 
5. AUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF 
BRIDGES 
Work on Woodland Street bridge, under Truman- 
Hobbs Act, was initiated in 1965 and completed in 
1966. Costs were $987,632. For details see page 922 of 
Annual Report for 1967. 
Flood Control 
6. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER 
AND RECREATIONAL AREA, KY 
AND TN 
Location. The project is located in Northeastern 
Tennessee and Southeastern Kentucky along the Big 
South Fork River and its tributaries in Pickett, Scott, 
Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee, and 
McCreary County, Kentucky. 
Existing project. A National Recreation Area was 
established in accordance with the concept included in 
the interagency report prepared pursuant to section 
208 of Flood Control Act of 1968. Total acreage was 
not to exceed 125,000 acres. The act specifically established 
the National Area for the purpose of preserving 
and interpreting the scenic, biological, archeological 
and historical resources of the river gorge area and 
developing the natural recreational potential of the 
area. The project was authorized by the Water 
Resource Development Act of 1974, 1976 and Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986. (See table 15B for 
authorizing legislation). The authorized cost (ceiling) 
for the project was $156,122,000. $112,863,920 was 
appropriated to The Corp of Engineers for design and 
construction of park facilities. The first construction 
contract was awarded in June 1981. 72% of the authorized 
project is complete. By Memorandum of 
Agreement dated 1 October 1990 jurisdiction of the 
area was transferred to The Department of Interior 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operation during fiscal year. The Memorandum 
of Agreement between the Department of Army and 
the Department of Interior, transferring jurisdiction of 
the Big South Fork National River and Recreation 
Area, itemized activities to be completed by the Army. 
In accordance with this agreement, miscellaneous 
minor construction items were completed. 
7. MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY 
Location. Dam located at mile 15.6 on Martins 
Fork of Clover Fork, Cumberland River, about 10 miles 
southeast of city of Harlan, with reservoir extending 
about 6 miles upstream within Harlan County, southeastern 
Kentucky. 
Existing project. Multiple-purpose improvement 
combining flood control with water quality control and 
recreation development adopted by 1965 Flood Control 
Act (H. Doc.244, 89th Cong.), in general accordance 
with recommendations. Dam is concrete type, 504 feet 
long and rising 97 feet above streambed. Outlet works 
provide for release of water from reservoir at varying 
levels. Drainage area above damsite is 55.7 square 
miles. At full pool level, spillway crest at elevation 
1341 above mean sea level, reservoir will cover 578 
acres and contain 21,120 acre-feet of storage capacity. 
Provision is made for 17,450 acre-feet of reservoir 
capacity between elevations 1341 and 1300 for control 
of floods in winter and spring season, and 14,360 acrefeet 
(El. 1341-1310) during summer and fall, in conjunction 
with which storage of 3,090 acre-feet would be 
available on a seasonal basis to meet streamflow 
requirements for water quality control and fish life 
below the dam. A minimum permanent pool of 3,670 
acre-feet, 274 acres in extent, is available during the 
potential flood seasons; and during late spring and 
summer when flood storage can be reduced, the lake is 
15-4

NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT 
operated generally at a higher level (El. 1310) to maintain 
a larger surface area of 340 acres for recreation 
and provide the required seasonal storage for releases 
of water during critical low-flow periods. Project prevents 
a major portion of average annual flood losses at 
Harlan and results in significant stage reductions with 
related benefits along rural reaches and to other urban 
areas downstream. Actual cost of project including 
$95,000 code 710 funds is $20,479,911. First construction 
contract awarded in December 1972. Project completed 
for beneficial use in September 1978. 
Local cooperation. Federal Water Project 
Recreation Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-72) applies in regard to 
non-Federal participation in recreation development, 
in addition to which local interests are to provide certain 
safeguards to ensure functioning of reservoir as 
intended. In May 1981 a final recreation cost-sharing 
contract with Harlan County was approved and certain 
recreation facilities have been jointly developed by the 
Corps and the County. These facilities, consisting of a 
swimming beach and a picnic area are now operated 
and maintained by Harlan County. Recreation investment 
to date (Corps and Local) is about $100,000. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures operated 
as required. A utility contract was awarded for 
additional water supply. 
8. MIDDLESBORO, CUMBERLAND 
RIVER BASIN, KY 
Location. At Middlesboro, Ky., on Yellow Creek, a 
tributary entering Cumberland River about 660 miles 
above its mouth. 
Existing project. A system of canals and levees 
around one side of town, arranged so as to divert most 
headwaters of Yellow Creek away form present channel 
through heart of city. Protection is thus afforded in 
large measure to life and property within business district 
and a large part of residential section. For project 
details, see page 1088 of Annual Report for 1962. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Work on levees, canals, and appurtenances was accomplished 
by hired labor. 
9. TUG AND LEVISA FORKS OF THE 
BIG SANDY RIVER AND UPPER 
CUMBERLAND, WV, VA AND KY 
Location. The project is located in the State of West 
Virginia and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and 
Virginia. The Cumberland portion consists of the 
Upper Cumberland River Basin, above Cumberland 
Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in 
length, averaging 30 miles in width at the lower portion 
and 10 miles in width upstream at Harlan KY. 
The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District 
and the Cumberland within the Nashville District. 
Existing project. Provides for flood control measures 
for communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and 
Upper Cumberland River Basins. The Cumberland 
portion has been assigned to the Nashville District. 
Only activities of the Nashville District are reported 
herein. Estimated Federal cost of new work under 
jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $347,000,000. 
The project was authorized by the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriation Act of 1981, Section 202 of 
PL 96-367. 
Local cooperation. Authorizing legislation 
requires that non-Federal interests shall hold and save 
the United States free from damages due to construction 
works and maintain and operate all such works 
after their completion in accordance with regulations 
by the Secretary of the Army. 
Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and 
design continued. Acquired 22.18 acres fee and8.47 
acres easement. Construction of a levee/floodwall at 
Harlan continued. Various relocation contracts associated 
with the flood protection project were awarded. A 
contract for a cutoff and levee at Loyall/Rio Vista continued, 
and a contract for a levee at Loyall/Rio Vista 
was awarded. Real estate acquisition and design of the 
final phase of work continued. At Barbourville a contract 
for construction of the floodwall and closure 
sturctures continued. Nonstructural evacuations and 
floodproofings continued at Harlan and Barbourville. 
10. OHIO RIVER BASIN 
(NASHVILLE DISTRICT) 
Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel 
improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin 
within Nashville District. 
Existing project. The general comprehensive plans 
approved for flood control and other purposes in Ohio 
River Basin is set forth in legislation listed in Table 15- 
B. Individual projects, local protection projects and 
lakes, considered in comprehensive plan within 
Nashville District are listed in Table 15-K. 
11. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent 
acts, requires local interests furnish assurances they 
will maintain and operate certain local protection projects 
after completion in accordance with regulations 
prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District 
Engineers are responsible for administration of these 
regulations within their respective districts. 
Maintenance inspections were made during fiscal year 
of completed protective works in localities transferred 
to local interests for maintenance and operation. Local 
interests were advised, as necessary, of measures 
required to maintain projects in accordance with standards 
prescribed by regulations. Fiscal year cost was 
$20,657. Total cost to September 30, 1995 was 
$425,003. For project inspection data see table 15-M. 
15-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1995 
12. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 
99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). 
Actual Federal cost for the fiscal year was $176,354 
for disaster preparedness. 
Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including 
Power 
13. CENTER HILL LAKE, OHIO 
RIVER BASIN, TN 
Location. Dam is on Caney Fork River, 26.6 miles 
above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 
309.2) at Carthage, TN. It is in DeKalb County, TN., 
about 55 miles east of Nashville, and 14 miles southeast 
of Carthage, TN. Reservoir extends about 64 
miles up main stream and about 10 miles up Falling 
Water River and lies within DeKalb, Putnam, White, 
and Warren Counties, TN. 
Existing project. A combination earth and concrete 
gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir 
for primary purposes of flood control and power 
production, with a permanent pool for public use and 
conservation purposes. In addition to main dam structure, 
provision was made for a rolled-earth dike to 
close a saddle in reservoir rim near damsite. For further 
details, see page 1099 of 1962 Annual Report. 
Actual cost of project including $8,940,642 code 710 
funds is $53,412,022. 
Local cooperation. None required on completed 
project. Recreation development subject to certain conditions 
of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal 
Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Dam was operated and structure and its 
appurtenance maintained as required. Operation of 
powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions 
and necessary shutdowns for inspection and 
maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated 
(265,795,300 kw-hr) was made available through 
Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley 
Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir 
management involved land management, public relations, 
and maintenance of public use facilities. Major 
maintenance included a contract for remedial work. It 
included drilling and grouting of the right abutment 
and left reservoir rim to control leakage. A contract 
was awarded for replacement of the power plant 
alarm system. 
14. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, OHIO 
RIVER BASIN, TN AND KY 
Location. Dam is on Obey River, 7.3 miles above its 
confluence with Cumberland River (mile 380.9) at 
Celina, TN. It is in Clay County, TN, and about 80 
miles northeast of Nashville, TN 28 miles north of 
Cookeville, TN, and 3 miles east of Celina, TN. 
Reservoir extends about 51 miles up main stream, 10 
miles up East Fork, and 6 miles up West Fork of Obey 
River, and lies within Cumberland and Clinton 
Counties, KY, and Clay, Pickett, Overton, and Fentress 
Counties, TN. 
Existing project. A concrete gravity-type dam, 
hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary 
purposes of flood control and power production with a 
permanent pool for public use an conservation purposes. 
See page 1096 of 1962 Annual Report for project 
details. Cost of project including $2,195,600 code 710 
funds and $150,000 non-Federal funds recreation facilities 
under the completed projects program is 
$28,317,746. 
Local cooperation. None required on completed 
project; future recreation development subject to certain 
conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under 
Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and 
appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of 
powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions 
and necessary shutdowns for inspection and 
maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated 
(86,221,000 kw-hr) was made available through 
Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley 
Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir 
management program involved public relations, and 
management and maintenance of public-use facilities. 
A contract was awarded for replacement of the power 
plant alarm system. 
15. J. 'PERCY PRIEST DAM AND 
RESERVOIR, OHIO, RIVER 
BASIN, TN 
Location. Damsite is on Stones River, 6.8 miles 
above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 
205.9); in Davidson County, TN.; and about 7 miles 
east of Nashville, TN. Reservoir extends southeasterly 
from dam about 32 miles along main stream, 10 miles 
up East Fork, 6.5 miles up West Fork, and for shorter 
distances up other tributaries of Stones River; and lies 
within Davidson, Rutherford, and Wilson Counties, 
TN. 
Existing project. A combination earth and concrete 
gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir 
for primary purposes of flood control, power production 
and recreation. For further details see page 
703 of 1969 Annual Report. Cost of project including 
$3,260,400 under code 710 funds and $46,000 non- 
Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed 
projects program is $56,914,039. 
Local cooperation. Recreation development subject 
to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing 
under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. 
15-6

NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and 
appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy 
generated (48,651,900 kw-hr) was made available 
through Department of the Interior to Tennessee 
Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under 
reservoir management program involved public relations, 
fish and wildlife management,and maintenance 
of public-use facilities. A contract was awarded for 
installation of a generator vibration monitoring system. 
16. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO 
RIVER BASIN, KY 
Location. Damsite is at mile 2.3 on Laurel River, a 
tributary of Cumberland River, in southcentral 
Kentucky. The two streams meet about 9 miles below 
Cumberland Falls, a prominent physiographic feature 
at head of Lake Cumberland which is formed by Wolf 
Creek Dam. Reservoir extends 19.2 miles upstream to 
site of Corbin, KY water-supply dam and lies within 
Laurel and Whitley Counties. 
Existing project. Project approved in general 
accordance with recommendations of House Document 
413, 86th Congress, by 1960 Flood Control Act, as 
amended by Public Law 88-253, was designed for purposes 
of flood control, power, and recreation as an integral 
unit of a coordinated plan for development of 
water resources of Cumberland River Basin. With the 
view of net gain in power potential on a system basis, 
the plan of improvement incorporated appropriate flood 
control storage in the proposed project and corresponding 
adjustment in operations of Wolf Creek Dam - Lake 
Cumberland for flood control and power, which in effect 
constituted a transfer of reservoir capacity without 
entailing a change in flood control benefits. Further 
detailed study giving full consideration to power capabilities 
and marketing arrangements indicated the 
advantage of maintaining present storage allocation at 
Wolf Creek and use of all available storage capacity of 
Laurel River Lake for power. The power plant is complete. 
Recreation was completed in FY 1986. Total 
cost is $56,741,232. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and 
appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy 
generated (56,523,000 kw-hr) was made available 
through Department of the Interior for distribution. 
Major maintenance included construction of an office 
and warehouse at Laurel Power Plant. 
17. WOLF CREEK DAM - LAKE 
CUMBERLAND, OHIO RIVER 
BASIN, KY 
Location. Wolf Creek Dam is on Cumberland River 
at mile 460.0 (above mouth) in Russell County, KY, 
about 10 miles southwest of Jamestown and 12 miles 
north of Albany, KY. Lake Cumberland extends 101 
miles up main stream, 48 miles up South Fork of 
Cumberland River, in Russell, Clinton, Wayne, 
Pulaski, McCreary, Laurel, and Whitley Counties, KY. 
Existing project. A combination earth and concrete 
gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir 
for primary purposes of flood control and power 
production, with a permanent pool for public-use and 
conservation purposes. See page 1094 of 1962 Annual 
Report for project details. Cost of project is 
$188,267,195. This cost includes $3,259,3472 code 710 
funds, $880,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities 
under the completed program, and $104,999,237 
for major rehabilitation. 
Local cooperation. None required on completed 
project; future recreation development subject to certain 
conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under 
Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: 
Activity involving the integrity of the structure began 
in 1968 when a leak or seepage developed in the 
embankment. The major rehab embankment contract 
was physically completed in September 1982. 
Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and 
appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of 
powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions 
and necessary shutdowns for inspection and 
maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated 
(766,855,000 kw-hr) was made available through 
Department of the Interior for distribution. Activities 
under reservoir management program involved land 
management activities, public relations, and maintenance 
of public-use facilities. Contracts were awarded 
for installation of additional uplift cells, and replacement 
of the power plant alarm system. 
Navigation 
18. CENTER HILL DAM SAFETY 
PROGRAM 
$7,818,129 was expended in FY 95 to continue remedial 
measures for the main dam and increased spillway 
capacity at Center Hill Dam. The work is to prevent 
sudden failure of the dam as a result of catastrophic 
flooding on the Caney Fork and Cumberland Rivers. 
Work will consist of securing six monoliths with tension 
anchors to raise reservoir elevation 1.4 feet, and 
construction of a 600 foot wide by 38 foot deep weir in 
the saddle dam with an erodible fuse plug embankment. 
This will allow normal operation of the project 
up to a 75 percent probable maximum flood (PMP). 
15-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1995 
General Investigations 
19. SURVEYS 
Costs for this period were $1,058,247 for which $446 
was for navigation studies $924,454 for flood damage 
prevention studies, $-1.171 for special environmental 
studies, $67,855 for special investigations, $36,861 for 
dam safety criteria studies and $6,479 for North 
American Waterfowl Management Plan, and $12,356 
for Planning Assistance to States, and $10,967 for 
Cooperation with Water Resources Agencies. 
20.COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
BASIC DATA 
Costs for this period were $168,779 for which 
$138,779 was for floodplain management services, and 
$30,000 was for an environmental data study in 
Tennessee. 
21. PRECONSTRUCTION 
ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
Costs this fiscal for the Kentucky Lock Addition 
were $1,843,065. 
15-8

NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT 
TABLE 15-A 
See 
Section 
in Text 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 
1. Cumberland River 
TN and KY 
2. Tennessee River, 
TN, AL, and KY 
3. Tenn.-Tombigbee 
Waterway, AL and MS 
Cost 
5. Big South Fork National 
River and Rec. Area, 
KY and TN 
6 Martins Fork Lake, KY 
Cost 
7. Middlesboro, Cumberland 
River Basin, KY 
8. Tug & Levisa Forks of 
the Big Sandy & Cumberland 
River, WV, VA and KY 
11. Cumberland, KY 
12 Center Hill Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, TN 
13. Dale Hollow Lake 
Ohio River Basin, 
TN and KY 
14. J. Percy Priest Dam and 
Reservoir, Ohio River 
Basin, TN 
15. Laurel RiverLake, 
Ohio River Basin, KY 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
1,999,758 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
560,045 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
- - - - 320,252,240 1,2,3 
- - - - 320,252,240 1,2,3 
23,482,000 20,682,000 20,912,900 23,203,955 375,429,118 4 
22,865,774 20,797,222 21,014,184 23,412,171 374,560,831 5 
- - - - 16,251,428 6 
- - - - 16,251,428 6 
12,110,000 10,415,000 12,132,000 12,840,000 237,136,048 7 
11,407,949 10,510,016 12,496,695 12,983,789 236,831,363 8 
-- - - 400,000 
- - - - 400,000 
-500,000 
5,997,359
0 
204,073 
575,000 
597,510 
60,000 
69,123 
22,387,000 
22,129,538 
-700,000 
498,581 
740,000 
635,957 
581,000 
542,803 
38,000 
44,021 
23,824,000 
19,695,774 
39,993
0 
19,098 
575,000 
613,810 
42,000 
23,237 
21,637,000 
22,688,568 
-100,00 
61,759 
-200,000 
6,912 
714,000 
601,498 
30,000 
53,525 
24,768,000 
26,534,666 
749,013,050 
748,995,346 
112,663,920 9 
112,406,804 10 
20,479,911 
20,479,911 
8,699,340 
8,546,856 
817,830 11 
817,830 11 
2,209,166 
2,207,836 
243,883,500 12 
228,226,532 13 
- - - - 66,642 
- - - - 66,642 
- - - - 53,412,022 14 
- - - - 53,412,022 15 
5,174,000 6,245,000 5,482,900 4,812,000 79,969,876 16 
4,570,127 6,759,874 5,539,713 4,815,135 79,805,271 17 
- - - - 28,317,746 18 
- - - - 28,317,746 19 
4,078,000 3,589,000 3,992,400 3,943,000 71,271,027 20 
4,017,319 3,749,473 3,974,955 3,949,667 71,141,52221 
- - - - 56,914,039 22 
- - - - 56,914,039 23 
3,253,000 3,044,000 3,399,400 3,739,000 53,495,651 24 
3,241,627 3,017,596 3,207,786 3,977,040 53,340,866 25 
1,210,000 1,214,000 1,266,500 
1,212,062 1,186,420 1,295,454 
1,649,000 
1,620,747 
56,741,232 
56,741,232 
16,824,943 26 
16,739,098 26 
15-9 
FY95 
Total to 
Sep 30, 1995 
_ _1_1_1______ 
___ __ 
_ ___

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1995 
TABLE 15-A 
(Continued) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep 30, 1995 
16. Wolf Creek Dam and New Work 
Lake Cumberland, Approp. - - - - 83,267,958 27 
Ohio River Basin, KY Cost - - - - 83,267,958 27 
Maint. 
Approp. 5,268,000 5,615,000 4,709,500 4,944,000 98,499,733 28 
Cost 4,910,334 5,788,814 4,783,364 4,965,926 98,313,567 29 
Rehab. 
Approp. - - - - 104,999,237 30 
Cost - - - - 104,999,237 30 
1. Includes $9,707,354 for abandoned and/or replaced works 
under the old Cumberland River system. (Amount includes 
$826,253 for new work and $3,266,706 for maintenance on previous 
project.) 
2. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and 
$102,966 contriubted by the State of Kentucky and $6,750 contributed 
by metropolitan Nashville, TN. 
3. Includes $298,000 funds provided from the Productive 
Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 
4. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and 
$2,628,257 for maintenance and operation of dams and other 
improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided 
from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 
98-8) of 1983. 
5. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and 
$2,628,257 for maintenance and operation of dams and other 
improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided 
from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 
98-8) of 1983. 
6. Includes $14,007,193 for new work and $4,005,175 for 
maintenance on previous projects. 
7. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of 
dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and 
$764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 
8. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of 
dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and 
$764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 
9. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive 
Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 
10. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive 
Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 
11. Includes $33,876 Emergency Relief Funds. 
12. Includes $19,430,000 contributed by the State of 
Kentucky. 
13. Includes $18,631,972 contributed by the State of 
Kentucky. 
14. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and 
$148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 
15. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and 
$148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriation Act 
(PL 98-8) of 1983. 
16. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, 
and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and 
other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds 
provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act 
(PL 98-8) of 1983. 
17. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, 
and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and 
other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds 
provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act 
(PL 98-8) of 1983. 
18. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed 
by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided 
from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98- 
8) of 1983. 
19. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed 
by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided 
from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98- 
8) of 1983. 
20. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, 
and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and 
other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds 
provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act 
(PL 98-8) of 1983. 
21. Includes $1,083,678 funds for special recreation use 
fees, and $884,178 for maintenance and operation of dams and 
other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds 
provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act 
(PL 98-8) of 1983. 
22. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan 
Government, Nashville, TN. 
23. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan 
Government, Nashville, TN. 
24. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and 
$1,026,978 for maintenance and operations of dams and other 
improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided 
from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) 
of 1983. 
25. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and 
$1,026,978 for maintenance and operations of dams and other 
improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided 
from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) 
of 1983. 
26. Includes $66,678 for maintenance and operations of 
dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 
27. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and 
$880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 
28. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and 
$198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other 
improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special 
recreation use fees, and $293,000 fund provided from the 
Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 
29. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and 
$198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other 
improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special 
recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the 
Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 
30. Includes $203,757 for claim paid on initial construction 
of switchyard. 
15-10

NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT 
TABLE 15-B " AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorized Project and Work Authorized Documents 
in Text Act 
Jul 13, 1892 
Jun 25, 1910 
Aug 30, 1935 
Jul 24, 1946 
Jun 19, 1952 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Jul 14, 1960 
Aug. 5, 1886 
Mar 2, 1907 
Mar 2, 1919 
Jun 5, 1920 
Jul 3, 1930 
Jun 26, 19342 
Jul 24, 1946 
Oct 1, 1980 
Jul 3, 1930 
May 18, 1933 
CUMBERLAND RIVER BELOW NASHVILLE 
Provision made for lock A 
Provision made for locks B to F, and for dredging 
below lock F. 
Repairing dams A to F, inclusive, and surmounting 
same with movable crests 
Provision of 9-foot channel by the construction 
of 3 moderate height dams below Nashville, via, 
Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham. 
Provision for hydroelectric power production as a 
function of Cheatham Dam. 
Construction of Barkley (Lower Cumberland) dam 
and reservoir project for navigation, flood control, 
hydroelectric power, and related purposes in lieu of 
Kuttawa and Dover navigation-only structures. 
Authorized change in alignment of Illinois Central 
Railroad. 
CUMBERLAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVILLE 
Provision made for locks and dams; the Secretary of 
War to determine the final plan of improvement. 
Dimensions of the locks fixed in accordance with 
reports of Mar. 30, 1887, and Nov. 25, 1890. 
Adoption of the report of the Board of Engineers, 
dated Feb. 26, 1906, limiting the lock and dam 
construction to locks and dams 1 to 7, and 21. 
Provision made for locks and dams 8 to 17. 
Authorizes work to proceed in Tennessee without 
waiting for action of local interests in Kentucky. 
Raising dam 1, 3 feet. 
Annual Report, 1890, p. 2151 
H. Docs. 758, 60th Cong., 1st sess.; 
and 1481, 60th Cong., 2d sess. 1 
H. Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 
2d sess. 
S. Doc 81, 83d Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc. 56, 86th Cong., 
2d sess. 
Annual Report 1884, p. 1663 
Annual Report 1888, p. 
1622, and Annual Report 
1892, p. 1933. 
H. Doc. 699, 59th Cong., 1st sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 10, 63d Cong., 2d sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 26, 70th Cong., 2d sess. 
Operation and care of locks and dams provided for 
with funds from War Department appropriations 
for rivers and harbors. 
Construction of Old Hickory, Cordell Hull (Carthage), 
and Celina Dams above Nashville for navigation and 
the development of power resources. 
Design and construct flood control measures for 
communities in the Upper Cumberland River basins. 
TENNESSEE RIVER 
Authorized navigable depth of 9 feet from mouth about 
650 miles to Knoxville, Tennessee to be obtained by 
construction of low dams. 
Authorized TVA to construct such dams in the 
Tennessee River as will provide a 9 foot channel. 
H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 
Sec. 202, PL 96367 
H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess 
15-11 
2. 
-- - I

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1995 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Section Date of 
in Text Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Aug 28, 1937 
Jun 28, 1938 
Aug 18, 1941 
Dec 22, 1944 
Jul 24, 1946 
May 17, 1950 
Dec 30, 1963 
Jun 18, 1965 
Aug 13, 1968 
Jun 19, 1970 
Mar 7, 1974 
Mar 7, 1974 
Jul 24, 1946 
9. 
Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 
75th Cong., 1st sess. 
Flood Control Committee Doc. 761, 
75th Cong., 3d sess. 
OHIO RIVER BASIN, NASHVILLE DISTRICT 
Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures 
for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. 
Project to be selected by Chief of Engineers with 
approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed 
$24,877,000 for construction. 
Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control 
and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be 
advisable at discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of 
Engineers and for initiation and partial accomplishment 
of plan, authorized $75million for reservoirs and 
$50,300,000 for local flood protection works. 
Additional $45.million for prosecution of comprehensive 
plan for Ohio River Basin. 
Additional $70 million for further prosecution of 
comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. 
Additional $125 million for further prosecution of 
comprehensive plan. 
Additional $100 million for prosecution of 
comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. 
Additional $150 million for further prosecution of 
comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes 
in Ohio River Basin. 
Additional $89 million for further prosecution of 
comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. 
Additional $35 million for further prosecution of 
comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. 
Additional $69 million for further prosecution of 
comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. 
AuthorizedBig South Fork National 
River and Recreation Area, KY and TN. 
Total area not to exceed 125,000 acres. 
Additional $120 million for further prosecution of 
comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. 
TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY 
Construction of waterway to connect above rivers 
and provide a 9 foot channel and minimum bottom 
width of 170 feet in river and canal sections and 
150 feet in the divide cut, with locks 110 by 600 
feet clear inside dimensions. 
Subsequent studies determined most practical 
plan consists of channel with bottom width of 
300 feet (280 feet in divide cut), fewer locks with 
higher lifts resulted in reducing number of lifts from 
18 to 10 and reduced length from 260 to 253 miles. 
H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 
S. 3710, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. R. 15166 91st Cong., 2d sess 
H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. Water 
Resources Develop. Act of 1974 
Amended by PL 94-587, 94th Cong. 
H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. River 
Basin Monetary Authorization 
Act of 1974. 
H. Doc, 486, 79th Cong. 2d sess. 
Page 1343, Part I, FY 1968 
House Hearings 
1. Contains latest published maps. Included in Public 
Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 
2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 
15-12 
TABLE 15-B 
(continued) 
H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess 
3.

NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT 
TABLE 15-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) 
For last Full Cost to Spt, 1995 
Report see Operation and 
Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance 
Caney Fork River, TN abandoned 1895 $ 27,828 
Clinch River, TN and VA abandoned 1923 53,949 $ 7,873 
Duck River, TN abandoned 1887 13,000 
Elk River, AL and TN abandoned 1904 4,000 
French Broad and Little 
Pigeon Rivers, TN abandoned 1931 249,605 33,554 
Holston River, TN abandoned 1911 5,714 
Little Tennessee River, TN abandoned 1888 5,510 
Obey River, TN abandoned 1887 11,500 
Red River, TN abandoned 1884 5,000 
South Fork of Cumberland 
River, KY abandoned 1892 11,967 
TABLE 15-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) 
For last Full Cost to Sept, 1995 
Report see Operation and 
Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance 
Barbourville, KY completed 1963 $2,088,147 
Coal Creek and Tributaries 
(Lake City), TN completed 1962 460,134 
Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), 
KY completed 1969 567,703 
Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), 
KY completed 1949 26,309 
Paint Rock River, AL completed 1967 544,173 
Pineville, KY completed 1963 1,679,126- 
1. Includes $9,950 contributed funds. 
15-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1995 
OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS 
(Including Power) 
For last Full Cost to S 
Report see 
epeat1995 
Operation and 
Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance 
Barkley Dam and Lake beneficial use - $146,498,644 $121,348,662 1 
Barkley, KY and TN 
Celina Dam, KY inactive -222,575- 
Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 31,682,762 90,428,043 1 
Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 79,874,492 60,651,1921 
Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 52,266,412 102,132,9341 
1. Details given under "Cumberland River, TN and KY" See Table 15-H 
TABLE 15-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For last Full Federal Contributed 
Report see Funds Funds 
Project Annual Report Date and Authority Expended Expended 
Three Islands Reservoir, 1970 Authorized: FC Act 1938, PL 761, $111,855 
Ohio River Basin, TfN 75 Cong., 3rd sess.; FC Act 1946, 
PL 525, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 
Deauthorized: 5 Aug 1977. 
Middlesboro, Yellow Creek - Authorized: FC Act, Dec 22, 
Bell County, KY 1944, PL 534, 78th Congress. 
Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986, 
PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Cumberland River above - Authorized: River & Harbor Act,- 
Nashville, TN Aug 5, 1886. 
Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986, 
PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Hiwassee River, Polk and 1923 Authorized: River & Harbor Act 123,065 
Bradley Counties, TN Aug 14, 1876. 
Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986, 
PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Rossview Lake, Tennessee - Authorized: FC Act, Jan 28, 1938, 6,779 
and Kentucky PL 76175th Congress. 
Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986, 
PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 
15-14 
TABLE 15-F

NASHVIILE, TN, DISTRICT 
TABLE 15-H CUMBE 
Dam and Reservoir 
Nearest town 
Miles above mouth of river 
Lock dimensions (feet) 
Lift at normal pool levels (feet) 
Depths on guard-sills at 
minimum pool levels (feet) 
Character of foundation 
Dam: 
Type 
Height 
Length, exclusive of lock 
section (feet) 
Spillway: 
Gross length (feet) 
Net length opening (feet) 
Crest gates: 
Type 
Number 
Size (feet) 
Operating levels at dam 
(feet, mean sea level): 
Maximum regulated 
Normal operation: 
Full pool 
Minimum pool 
Minimum pool in advance 
of floods 
Reservoir area (acres) 
Reservoir capacity (acre-feet): 
Flood control 
Power drawdown 
Dead storage 
Total 
Canel: 
Length (mile) 
Bottom width (feet) 
Depth a minimum pool 
level (feet) 
Power development: 
Number of units 
Generator rating (kilowatts) 
Total installation (kilowatts) 
Percent of project completion 
Year opened to navigation 
CostS 
RLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPAL FEATURES 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
Barkley Cheatham Old Hickory Cordell Hull Celina 
Kuttawa, KY Ashland City, Old Hickory Carthage, TN Celina, TN 
11 miles. TN, 9 miles TN, 3 miles 5 miles 5 miles 
30.6 148.7 216.2 313.5 385.4 
110 by 800 110 by 800 84 by 400 84 by 400 - 
57 26 60 59 
11, upper, 14, upper; 14, upper, 14, upper, - 
13, lower 17, lower 13, lower 13, lower 
Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock 
Concrete 
gravi and 
157 
9,959 
804 
660 
Tainter 
12 
55 by 60 
375 
359 
354 
346 
93,430 
1,213,0003,4 
259,000 
610,000 
2,082,00 
Concrete 
gravity 
75 
800 
480 
420 
Tainter 
7
60 by 27 
Concrete 
grawt and 
98 
3,6052 
325 
270 
Tainter 
6
45 by 41 
4503 
385 
382 
7,450 
19,8007 
84,200 
104,000 
442 
27,450 
125,0005 
63,000 
357,000 
545,000 
Concrete 
larnitd 
93 
1,1382 
291 
225 
Tainter 
5
45 by41 
5083 
508 
501 
499 
13,920 
85,6005,6 
20,500 
204,800 
310,900 
Concrete 
gravity and 
earthfill 
86 
2,298 
290 
250 
Tainter 
5
50 by 37 
5643 
560 
559 
559 
16,960 
55,9505 
14,700 
287,300 
357,950 
1.75 
400 
11 
4
32,500 
130,000 
8
1964 
$146,5000,000 
3
12,000 
36,000 
$213,000,000 
4
25,000 , 
100,000 
8
1952 
$31,700,000 
3
33,333 
100,000 
8
1973 
$79,874,500 
3
36,000 
108,000 
8
1954 
$52,266,000 
1. Clear width and length available for full width. 
2. Exclusive of lock section. 
3. Surcharge. 
4. Normal operation (elev. 375-359) during nonflood season; 
flood control allowance to be increased to 1,472,000 acre-feet 
(elev. 375-354) during season of major floodflows. 
5. Surcharge storage 
6. During flood season (elev. 508-501); minimum 51,800 
acre-feet (elev. 508-504) with nornil operation during non-flood 
season. 
7. Daily pondage allowance; run-of-river project. 
8. Completed for full beneficial use. 
9. Includes recreation facility costs. 
15-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY OF CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1995 
TABLE 15-I 
Project1 
Kentucky 
Pickwick Landing: 
Auxiliary lock 
Main lock 
Wilson: 
Auxiliary lock 
Main lock 
General Joe 
Wheeler: 
Auxiliary lock 
Main lock 
Guntersville: 
Auxiliary lock 
Main lock 
Nickaack: 
Auxiliary lock 
Main lock 
Chickamauga 
Watts Bar 
TENNESSEE RIVER 
(SEE SECTION 2 OF TEXT) 
Lock Dimension 
Length Minimum Depth 
Width Avail- Lift on Guard Sills 
of able for 
Miles Chain- Full Nor- Maxi- 
Above Miles from ber Width mal mum Lower Upper Ch 
Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) F 
22.4 0.5 above Gilbertsville, KY 110 600 56 73.3 12.7 11.0 L 
206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, TN 
206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, TN 
259.4 2.9 above Florence, AL 
259.4 2.9 above Florence, AL 
274.9 18.4 above Florence, AL 
274.9 18.4 above Florence, AL 
349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL 60 360 
349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL 110 600 
424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 110 600 
424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 110 800 
471.0 6.9 above Chattanooga, TN 60 360 
529.9 6.8 above Breedenton, TN 60 360 
I
I 
110 600 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 
110 1000 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 
60 292 94 100.0 11.04 11.2 
300 
110 600 94 100.0 13.0 13.0 
60 400 48 51.5 13.2 14.7 
110 600 48 51.5 13.0 13.0 
39 45.0 11.8 13.0 
39 45.0 12.7 13.0 
39 41.0 13.0 13.0 
39 41.0 13.0 13.0 
49 53.0 13.0 10.0 
58 70.0 11.8 12.0 
Year 
Opened 
haracter of Navi- Kind 
oundation gation of Dam 
Limestone 1942 Fixed 
imestone 1937 Fixed 
imestone 1984 Fixed 
Limestone 
Limestone 
1927 
1959 
Cost of 
Type of Each Lock 
Construction and Dam 
Concrete and 2 
earthfill 
Concrete and 3 
earthfill 
Concrete and 3 
earthfill 
Fixed Concrete and $46,973,5405 
earthfill 7 
Limestone 1934 Fixed Concrete and 1,796,2956 
earthfill 
Limestone 1963 Fixed Concrete and 7 
earthfill 
Limestone 1937 Fixed 
Limestone 1965 Fixed 
Limestone 
Limestone 
Limestone 
Shale 
1967 Fixed 
Fixed 
1939 Fixed 
1941 Fixed 
Concrete and 
earthfill 
Concrete 
Concrete 
Concrete and 
earthfill 
3&7 
7
7
7 
3&7 
3 
602.3 1.3 above Lenoir City, TN 
23.1 22.1 above Kingston, TN 
60 360 72 80.0 11.8 12.0 
75 400 54 60.0 13.0 13.0 
Limestone 1943 Fixed Concrete and 
earthfill 
Limestone 1963 Fixed Concrete 
15-16 
Fort Loudon 
Melton Hill 
(Clinch R.) 
1. H. Doc. 328, 71 Cong., 2d sess, contains table, pp. 98 and 99, giving pertinent information concerning low dams contemplated 5. Constructed by the Corps under authority of sec. 124, National Defense Act of June 3, 1916, (H. Doc. 126 
under 1930 project. Annual Report for 1938, pp. 1218 and 1219, contains similar information pertaining to low dams in addition to sess.). Actual cost of lock and dam. 
existing locks and dams, including those constructed or under construction by Tennessee Valley Authority. 6. Actual cost of lock only as constructed by the Corps; dams constructed by Tennessee Valey Authority. 
2. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 7. Constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 
3. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. Design for lock prepared with Corps forces and funds. 
4. Tailwater in canal; flight of 2 locks. 
2, 64th Cong., 1st

NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT 
TABLE 154 TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL, AND KY 
TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEP 30, 1995 
(See Section 2 of Text) 
Channel Operation & 
Funds New Work Maintenance Maintenance Total 
Regular $2,244,236 $13,385,211 $219,429,307 $222,074,965 1,2 
Maintenance - 11,665 11,665 
Increase of compen- 5 - 5 
sation, rivers and 
harbors, 1919 
(certified claims) 
Total $2,244,236 $13,385,216 $219,440,972 $235,070,4241,2 
1. In addition, surplus property valued at $54,336 was ation and care of works of improvement under provisions of 
transferred from the project without reimbursement. Excludes appropriation for such purposes. 
$4,005,175 expended betweenl890 and June 30, 1935, on oper- 2. Excludes $14,007,192 previous construction cost. 
TABLE 15-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) 
LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 
Type of Estimated Cost 
Location Protection Federal Non-Federal Total 
Cumberland, KY Channel Improvement 520,000 240,000 760,000 1 
1. Deferred 
TABLE 15-L RESERVOIRS 
Tributary Basin and Reservoir 
Center Hill Lake, TN 
Dale Hollow Lake, TN and KY 
J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN 
Laurel River Lake, KY 
Martins Fork Lake, KY 
1. Details of this project are in individual report. 
2. Formerly Stewarts Ferry Reservoir. 
Total 
Federal 
Steam Cost 
Caney Fork River $53,412,022 1 
Obey River 28,167,7461 
Stones River 56,868,039 1,2 
Laurel River 56,741,232 3 
Martins Fork 20,479,911 
3. See "Other authorized multiple-purpose projects." 
15-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1995 
TABLE 15-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 10 of Text) 
Project Date of Inspection 
Barbourville, KY Apr 1995 
Corbin, KY Apr 1995 
Lake City, TN Apr 1995 
Middlesboro, KY (Yellow Creek) Apr 1995 
Middlesboro, KY (Diversion Canal) Apr 1995 
Pineville, KY Apr 1995 
Spring City, TN Apr 1995 
Sunbright, TN (Whiteoak Creek) Apr 1995 
TABLE 15-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 
P.L. 858, 80th Congress, as amended 
Project FY95 Cost 
Little Limestone Creek, TN $ 139,558 
Sinking Creek, Lebanon, TN 12,685 
Loves Creek, Knoxville, TN 14,826 
Clark Spring Branch, Decatur, AL 68,361 
Hills Creek, Warren County, TN 9,660 
Richland Creek, Morgantown, TN 42,245 
Sinking Creek,Murfreesboro, TN 23,972 
Sequatchie River, Marion Co, TN 6,257 
Clear Fork River, TN 12,431 
Dallas Branch, Huntsville, AL 13,583 
Elk Ceek, , TN 13,182 
Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 
Project F-- 9V ot 
Emory River, Harriman, TN 
Duck River, Hickman Co., TN 
McGregor Park, Montgomery Co., TN 
South Holston River, Kingsport, TN 
Sequoyah Hills Park Phase II, Knoxville, TN 
Clinch River, Kingston, TN 
Ditto Landing, Huntsville, AL 
Tennessee River, UT Experiment Station, Knoxville, TN 
Cumberland River, Ted Rhodes Golf Course, Nashville, TN 
$ 49,085 
29,819 
30,193 
63,805 
38,668 
51,874 
7,503 
7,097 
432,579 
15-18 
- - --

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT *
This district encompasses southwestern Ohio, all of 
Central Kentucky and portions of western and eastern 
Kentucky, the southern 3/4 of Indiana, and southeastern 
Illinois , all included in the drainage basin of the 
Ohio River and its tributaries (exclusive of Tennessee 
and Cumberland Rivers) from mile 438 (below Pittsburgh) 
immediately upstream from Foster, KY., to the 
mouth of the Ohio. 
All cost and financial statements for projects are 
listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are 
referenced in text and also appear at the end of this 
chapter. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation - Channels and Habors Page 
1. Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY ..... 16-2 
Navigation - Locks and Dams 
2. Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio 
R iver .............................................................. 16-2 
3. Green and Barren Rivers, KY ................... 16-2 
4. Kentucky River, KY ................................... 16-2 
5. Open Channel Work, Ohio River .............. 16-3 
6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 16-3 
7. Navigation Work Under Special 
Authorization .............................................. 16-3 
Flood Control - Local Protection 
8. Evansville, IN ............................................... 16-3 
9. Frankfort, South Frankfort, KY................... 16-3 
10. M ill Creek, OH ............................................ 16-4 
11. Salyersville, KY .... ........................... 16-4 
12. Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ........... 16-4 
Flood Control - Reservoirs 
13. Barren River Lake, KY ................................ 16-5 
14. Brookville Lake, KY ...................................... 16-5 
15. Buckhorn Lake, KY ....................................... 16-5 
16. Caesar Creek Lake, OH ................................ 16-6 
17. Cagles M ill Lake, IN .................................... 16-6 
18. Carr Fork Lake, KY ...................................... 16-6 
19. Cave Run Lake, KY ....................................... 16-7 
20. Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN............................. 16-7 
21. Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH ... 16-7 
22. Green River Lake, KY ................................... 16-8 
23. Huntington Lake, IN..................................... 16-8 
24. Mississinewa Lake, IN .................................. 16-8 
25. M onroe Lake, IN ............................................ 16-9 
26. Nolin Lake, KY ............................................. 16-9 
27. Ohio River Basin (Louisville District).......... 16-9 
28. Patoka Lake, IN ........................................... 16-10 
29. Rough River Lake and Channel 
Improvement, KY ........................................ 16-10 
Page 
30. Salamonie Lake, IN ..................................... 16-10 
31. Taylorsville Lake, KY.................................. 16-11 
32. Wabash River Basin .................................... 16-11 
33. West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH ............ 16-11 
34. William H. Harsha Lake, OH ..................... 16-12 
35. Inspection of Completed 
Flood Control Projects ................................. 16-12 
36. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.. 16-13 
37. Flood Control Works Under Special 
Authorization ............................................. 16-13 
General Investigations 
38. Surveys ...................................................... 16-13 
39. Precontruction Engineering and Design ... 16-13 
40. Coordinattion with other Agencies ............ 16-13 
41. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............ 16-13 
Tables 
Table 16-A 
Table 16-B 
Table 16-C 
Table 16-D 
Table 16-E 
Table 16-F 
Table 16-G 
Table 16-H 
Table 16-I 
Table 16-J 
Table 16-K 
Table 16-L 
Table 16-M 
Cost and Financial Statement.... 16-14 
Authorizing Legislation ............. 16-19 
Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects ........................................ 16-22 
Not applicable 
Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects ........................................ 16-23 
Not applicable 
Deauthorized Projects ................. 16-25 
Principal Features of Green 
and Barren Rivers and Kentucky 
River Navigation Systems .......... 16-27 
Ohio River Basin - Total Cost 
of Basin Plan................................ 16-28 
Wabash River Basin - Total 
Cost of Basin Plan ....................... 16-32 
Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects ........................... 16-32 
Flood Control Work Under Special 
Authorization............................... 16-35 
General Investigations................ 16-36 
16-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Navigation - Channels and Harbors 
1. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, LICKING 
RIVER, KY 
Location. The Licking River originates in southeast 
ern Kentucky and flows generally northwesterly to its 
confluence with the Ohio River at Covington, KY, mile 
470.2 below Pittsburgh, PA. The Licking River Basin 
includes the drainage area of the Licking River, and all 
other left bank tributaries of the Ohio River from 
Markland Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 531.5) 
upstream to Meldahl Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 
436.2). 
Existing project. There are no locks and dams on 
the Licking River. However, a navigable depth of 9 feet 
is maintained up to mile 7.0 on the Licking River. 
Local cooperation. None. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities, 
oil products, and coal are considered adequate for 
existing traffic. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. 
Maintenance: Dredging was done where required to 
provide an adequate and dependable channel. 
Navigation - Locks and Dams 
2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND 
DAMS, OHIO RIVER 
For report on this improvement, see the heading 
under Ohio River. 
3. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY 
Location. Green River rises in Casey County, KY, 
flows northwesterly 370 miles, and empties into the 
Ohio River about 8 miles above Evansville, IN. Barren 
River rises in Monroe County, KY, flows northwesterly 
130 miles, and empties into Green River 1/2 mile above 
Lock 4 and 149.5 miles above the mouth of Green River. 
Existing project. Six locks and dams on Green 
River and one on Barren River to provide, with channel 
work in pools of dams, a navigable depth of 9 feet and 
width of 200 feet from the Ohio River to mile 103 Green 
River, 3.2 miles upstream from Paradise, KY; a navigable 
depth of 5.5 feet from mile 103 Green River to 
Mammoth Cave, KY, mile 197.8 Green River, and from 
mouth of Barren River mile 149.5 Green River, to 
Bowling Green, KY, mile 30.1, Barren River. 
Fluctuations in stage vary considerably at different 
locks. At Lock 3, Green River, ordinary high stages are 
from 12 to 15 feet above pool level, and at Lock 1, Barren 
River, from 7 to 10 feet above pool. Maximum stages of 
record are 34 feet above normal pool stage at Lock 3, 
Green River, and 29 feet at Lock 1, Barren River, 
obtained during floods of 1937 and 1913, respectively. 
(See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation and Table 16- 
H for principal features of the locks and dams.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Coal handling facilities located 
on the Green River between miles 81.5 and 108.1 near 
South Carrollton, Rockport, Paradise and Rochester, 
Kentucky, are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. 
Maintenance: Consisted of operation and maintenance 
of Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, and removal 
of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain 
adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of 
Green River to mile 103 Green River. Routine maintenance 
was performed. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Locks and Dams 1 
and 2, Green River, are in good condition. Lock and Dam 
3, Green River, and Lock and Dam 1, Barren River are 
in fair condition, and Lock 4, Green River, is in poor 
condition. Dam 4, Green River, failed May 24, 1965, 
when 120 feet washed out. Breach later widened, and 
repairs have been permanently deferred. Pool of Dam 
1, Barren River, is maintained for local small boat use, 
but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss 
of lower pool. Operation activity was discontinued at 
Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River 
in January 1974 and at Lock 3, Green River in September 
1981. The residences and associated buildings and 
certain real estate at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and 
Dam 1 Barren River were disposed of in January 1975. 
Operation of Locks 5 and 6, Green River, was discontinued 
August 1951, as they were no longer used by river 
traffic. Controlling project depth in lower 103 miles of 
Green River is 9 feet; controlling depth from mile 103 to 
Bowling Green, KY, is 5.5 feet. Under permit issued by 
District Engineer on August 20, 1963, private interests 
dredged channel of Green River to extend 9-foot-depth 
to coal loading terminal at mile 108.1. Channel of Green 
River above Lock 3 is no longer maintained. 
4. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY 
Location. Formed by confluence of its North and 
Middle Forks about 4 miles east of Beattyville in east 
central Kentucky, (South Fork joins the main stream at 
that location), flows northwesterly and empties into 
Ohio River at Carrollton, KY, mile 545.8 below Pittsburgh, 
PA. 
Existing project. Provides for 14 locks and fixed 
dams to give, in connection with improvement of Ohio 
River, slack water navigation of 6 feet minimum depth 
from Ohio River to places on the three forks that are 
short distances above Beattyville, KY. Length of 6-footdepth 
project on main stem of Kentucky River is 258.6 
miles to confluence of Middle and North Forks. Cost of 
completed new work is $4,176,749. River frequently 
rises to 35 feet or higher. Extreme height at Lock 1 due 
to flood backwater from Ohio River is 60.3 feet, while 
extreme floods reach height of 47.6 feet at Lock 4, and 
35.5 feet at Lock 14. At some intermediate locks 
extreme height of floods exceeds 40 feet. All flood 
heights refer to upper pool gages. Existing project was 
adopted by 1879 River and Harbor Act (H. Ex. Doc. 47, 
45th Cong., 3d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 1398). 
Operation and care of locks and dams were included in 
project July 1, 1935, under provision of Permanent 
16-2

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. (See Table 
16-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) 
On December 19, 1976, the lock operation schedules 
for commercial traffic and recreational craft on the 
Kentucky River System were reduced from continuous 
24-hour year-round operation to two-shift year-round 
operation of Locks 1 through 4, intermittent daily 
operation of Locks 5 through 10, and intermittent 
operation five days weekly of Locks 11 through 14. 
Since that time the hours for operation of Locks 5 
through 14 have been reduced in several increments. 
On October 1, 1981, Locks 5 through 14 were closed to 
traffic and placed in caretaker status. Locks 5, 6, 8, 9, 
and 10 were in operation for 15 weekends during fiscal 
year 1982 and closed at the end of this period. Locks 5 
through 14 were leased to the State of Kentucky on May 
21, 1985. The State of Kentucky operated these locks on 
weekends during the summer boating seasons through 
the Fiscal Year. The lease expired on October 15, 1989, 
and Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed 
in caretaker status. During the fiscal year Locks 1 
through 4 continued a two-shift, year-round operation. 
Licenses. Federal Regulatory Commission License 
No. 539, to Kentucky Utilities Co., at Dam 7, Kentucky 
River, Annual charge, $4,400; total collections through 
September 30, 1995, $319,605. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities 
are considered adequate for existing traffic. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. 
Maintenance: Consisted of operation and maintenance 
of Locks and Dams 1 through 4 and removal of shoals, 
snags, and slides as required to maintain an adequate 
channel for existing traffic between mouth of river and 
Dam 5 at mile 82.2 Kentucky River. Maintenance: 
Routine maintenance was performed. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project 
was completed in 1917. Work accomplished was rehabilitation 
of the five old State locks and dams and 
construction of new Locks and Dams 6 to 14 inclusive. 
Repairs have been made to deteriorated locks and dams 
as required to keep locks in operation and maintain pool 
levels above dams except in extreme dry weather, when 
some pools fall below normal levels, details in Annual 
Reports for 1963, 1964, and 1965. Channel work was 
performed as required to provide for existing river 
traffic. Controlling navigable depth in length of river 
covered by existing project was 6 feet at end of fiscal 
year. 
5. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO 
RIVER 
For report on this improvement, see this heading 
under Ohio River. 
6. OTHER AUTHORIZED 
NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
See Table 16-C. 
7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
None. 
Flood Control - Local Protection 
8. EVANSVILLE, IN 
Location. In Vanderburgh County, IN, on right bank 
of Ohio River, 792.2 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. (See 
U.S. Geological Survey map of Evansville-South, IN.) 
Existing project. Construction of a system of levees 
and concrete floodwalls, together with pumping plants 
for disposal of interior drainage, at Evansville. For 
further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1127. 
Project will provide protection for City of Evansville, IN, 
against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood (maximum 
of record), with a 3-foot freeboard. Estimated total cost 
ofnew work(1995) is $44,654,000 Federal, and $5,500,000 
non-Federal. Existing project selected for construction 
under general authorization for Ohio River Basin 1937 
Flood Control Act. 
Local cooperation. Section 3 of Flood Control Act of 
June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with 
for Howell Unit 1, Knight Township sections, and Pigeon 
Creek Section, Unit 1 and Unit 2, Parts 1, 2, 3, and 
4. 
Operations during fiscal year. During the 1995 
flood season estimated damages of $511,000 were prevented. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Howell Unit 1, 
Knight Township, Pigeon Creek Unit 1, and Pigeon 
Creek Unit 2, Parts 1, 2, 3, and 4 have been completed. 
Howell Section, Unit 2 was reclassified from the "active" 
category to the "inactive" category July 7, 1977 based on 
studies that indicated this part of the project is not 
economically justified. This part was deauthorized by 
Congress under authority of Public Law 99-662, effective 
July 1992. Project is 100 percent complete overall. 
9. FRANKFORT, SOUTH 
FRANKFORT, KY 
Location. The project area of South Frankfort lies 
along the south bank of the Kentucky River in Frankfort, 
KY, Franklin County in the Bluegrass Region of 
central Kentucky. 
Existing Project. The project consists of approximately 
3,880 feet of concrete floodwall and earthen 
levee, interior pumping facilities, and bank protection; 
and, will provide protection to 390 properties in South 
Frankfort. The Kentucky River drains an area of about 
6,966 square miles in the central part of Kentucky and 
empties into the Ohio River at mile 545.8. Estimated cost 
of new work (1995) is $11,510,000, of which $8,630,000 
is Federal, and $2,880,000 is non-Federal. The project 
was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1938, as 
modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 
1990. 
16-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Local Cooperation. The non-Federal cost sharing 
partner is the City of Frankfort, Kentucky. To meet its 
financial requirements, the city has received an amount 
not to exceed one half of the non-Federal cost or $2.4 
million, whichever is less, in the form of an allocation 
contained in the March 30, 1990, Kentucky House Bill 
No. 799. They have allocated $1,271,000 from the City's 
General Fund and Public Transit Accounts and have set 
aside some $$1,225,000 in additional bonding capability 
with either the Kentucky League of Cities Bond Pool or 
First Kentucky Securities Corps. A Project Cooperation 
Agreement (PCA) was executed in July 1993 and the 
City has completed all necessary real estate acquisition. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Work 
on the second construction contract for 1,250 feet of 
floodwall and the 150 cfs pump station continued in FY 
95 and final contract was awarded in May 1995. The 
Project is 57 percent complete. Maintenance: During 
the 1995 flood season estimated damages of $848,000 
were prevented. 
10. MILL CREEK, OH 
Location. Project is located along the 18-mile length 
of Mill Creek and three-fourths mile length of East Fork 
in Hamilton County, OH. Lower Mill Creek is in the 
commercial and industrial heart of the Cincinnati metropolitan 
area in the southwestern portion of the State. 
Existing project. Eighteen miles of channel improvement, 
2 miles of levees, two pumping plants, 
modification of 29 bridges, and the addition of two 
pumping units at the present Mill Creek Barrier Dam, 
located near the Ohio River, are included in the project. 
Acquisition and development with appropriate landscaping 
of 620 acres along the creek will be provided for 
high-density urban oriented recreational use. 
Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 
1936 as amended, applies. In addition, local interests 
must provide without cost to the United States all 
modifications and relocations of buildings, utilities, 
street and foot bridges, sewers, and related and special 
facilities as necessary for construction of project; prevent 
encroachment on improved channels and on ponding 
areas which would impair capacities; at least annually 
inform interests affected as to degree of protection 
afforded by project, and provide guidance and leadership 
in preventing unwise and uneconomical development 
of flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of 
floodproofing, land regulation planning, or other flood 
plain management techniques to reduce flood losses. 
Further, with respect to the recreational aspects of the 
project, local interests are required to furnish assurances 
that they will, if necessary, pay or contribute in 
kind, a portion of the cost of recreational facilities 
which, when added to the cost of recreation land, would 
amount to at least 50 percent of the total first cost of the 
recreation land and recreational facilities, and assure 
access to the recreation facilities to all on equal terms. 
An assurance agreement covering local cooperation 
requirements for the project consistent with Section 221 
of the 1970 Flood Control Act and the Uniform Relocation 
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies 
Act of 1970 was executed by the Millcreek Valley Conservancy 
District February 6, 1975, and for the Secretary 
of the Army March 28, 1975. A recreation cost 
sharing contract was executed by the Conservancy 
District February 25, 1975, and approved by the Secretary 
of the Army May 28, 1975. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction 
of Section 1 is complete. At the direction of the 
Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, the 
Corps has initiated a study to evaluate the consequences 
of terminating further Federal activity on the 
project. All further design and construction activities 
are unprogrammed. Maintenance: During the 1995 
flood season estimated damages of $417,000 were prevented. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. DM #1, Hydrology 
& Hydraulics; DM #2, Phase 1, Plan Formulation; DM 
#3, Phase II, General Project; DM #4, Construction 
Materials; DM #5, Railroad Relocations, and DM #6, 
Barrier Dam Pumps are complete. DM#7, Public Use 
was completed in FY 1992. Construction channel and 
levee-Sections 2,3,4A, and 7A, Phase 1, are complete. 
Project is about 52 percent complete overall. 
11. SALYERSVILLE, KY 
Location. Project is located along the banks of the 
Licking River from approximately mile 266 and 271 in 
Magoffin County, Kentucky along the Mountain Parkway 
about 75 miles southeast of Lexington, Kentucky. 
Existing project. The most cost-effective and feasible 
plan to provide the authorized level of protection 
(1978 flood protection) is called the "Cut-Thru Plan" and 
includes two channel cut-thrus, a barrier dam at the 
upstream cut-thru, and an 0.8 mile reach of channel 
improvement connecting the two cut-thrus. Estimated 
total cost of new work (1995) is $10,330,000 of which 
$9,348,600 is Federal and $981,400 is non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. The local sponsor qualifies for 
an "ability to pay" reduction pursuant to Section 103(m) 
of the 1986 Water Resource Development Act. Based on 
current costs and economics, the local sponsor share 
would be 9.5 percent of the total project cost. The Project 
Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in August 
1995 and physical construction will be initiated in FY 
1996. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Engineering 
& Design continues. 
Conditions at the end of fiscal year. Project is 
about 15 percent complete overall with design approximately 
95percent complete. 
12. SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON 
COUNTY, KY 
Location. In Jefferson County, KY, on left bank of 
Ohio River from mile 616 to 628.6. 
Existing project. Construction of 68,500 feet of 
levee, 1,550 feet of concrete wall, four pumping plants, 
and other necessary appurtenances. Project provides 
protection for 24,100 acres against Ohio River floods 
equal to 1937 flood of record with 3-foot freeboard. 
16-4

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
Estimated cost of new work (1995) is $70,075,083, of 
which $60,216,083 is Federal, and $9,859,000 is non- 
Federal. Project was authorized under Flood Control 
Act of August 1968. Recreation as a project purpose has 
been deferred until such time as a water quality problem 
on Pond Creek is corrected. 
Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 
1936 as amended applies. In addition, local interests 
agree to administer project land and water areas for 
recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and to 
pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through 
user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first 
cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and 
wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, 
maintenance and replacement of lands and facilities for 
recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Jefferson 
County Fiscal Court expressed intent to fulfill requirements 
by resolution dated April 4, 1967. Formal assurances 
of local cooperation for the flood protection portion 
of the project was executed by resolution of Jefferson 
County Fiscal Court, adopted September 17, 1971, and 
assurances for the recreation portion of the project were 
executed by similar resolution, adopted September 14, 
1971. Authorization-of-entry for levee and floodwall 
sections 1,2,3,4,4A,5 and Pond Creek Pump Plant have 
been furnished. Project was transferred to local interest 
on September 8, 1989. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Trial 
expenses to settle claims against a contractor to install 
pumps and motors at the Pond Creek Pumping Station 
continued. Project is 99 percent complete overall. 
During the 1995 flood season no benefits were accomplished. 
Flood Control - Reservoirs 
13. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY 
Location. Dam is on Barren River, 79.5 miles above 
its confluence with Green River and 10 miles northeast 
of Scottsville, KY. At flood control pool reservoir extends 
upstream about 40 miles in Barren and Allen 
Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of 
Lucas, KY.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and 
allied purposes. Dam is rolled earth and rockfill, 146 
feet high and 3,970 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet 
works and uncontrolled open-cut spillway. Total storage 
capacity is 815,200 acre-feet (768,000 for flood 
control and 46,600 for water supply storage). For 
further details, see page 1125 of Annual Report for 1962. 
Cost of the completed project is $27,479,717 including 
$2,335,055 Federal funds and $108,418 non-Federal 
funds for construction of recreation facilities under the 
completed projects program. Project was authorized by 
Flood Control Act of 1938. 
Local cooperation. None required by authorizing 
act. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, 
contract with City of Glasgow for water supply storage 
was approved by Secretary of Army on October 4, 1965. 
Terms require City to pay $23,433, which is project cost 
allocated to water storage plus capitalized prepayment 
of proportionate share of operation, maintenance, and 
major replacement costs. A contract, with the Common 
wealth of Kentucky for development of additional campsites, 
shoreline protection and breakwater extension at 
Barren River Lake State Park under the cost-sharing 
category of the completed projects program was approved 
by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
During the 1995 flood season estimated damages of 
$4,985,000 were prevented. Recreational benefits were 
$38,374,319. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction 
started in March 1960 and all major construction and 
relocation items were completed in October 1964. Project 
was placed in operation in March 1964. Land acquisition 
is complete. 
14. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN 
Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Whitewater 
River, 2.4 miles above confluence with West Fork, and 
about 1-1/2 miles north of Brookville, Indiana. The 
reservoir lies in Franklin and Union Counties, Indiana. 
(See U.S. Geological Survey map of Brookville, IN.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and 
allied purposes. Dam is earthfill, 182 feet high and 
3,004 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works, and 
uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 
359,600 acre-feet (214,700 for flood control, 89,300 for 
water supply, and 35,500 for conservation). A minimum 
pool of 20,100 acre-feet is maintained. Cost of completed 
new work is $45,402,565 of which $37,905,073 is Federal 
cost and $7,497,492 is non-Federal contribution for 
water supply storage. Project was authorized by 1938 
Flood Control Act. 
Local cooperation. None required by authorizing 
act. Contract with State of Indiana for water supply 
storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958 
was approved by Secretary of Army, August 5, 1965. 
Under terms of contract, State paid initial costs allocated 
to water supply feature of project plus capitalized 
prepayment of proportionate share of operation and 
maintenance costs. 
Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: During 1995 flood season estimated 
damages of $87,000 were prevented. Routine maintenance 
was performed. Recreational benefits were 
$20,472,328 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was 
started in November 1965 and project was placed in 
operation January 1974. Construction and land acquisition 
are complete. 
15. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY 
Location. Dam is on Middle Fork of Kentucky River, 
43.4 miles above mouth, and 0.5 mile upstream from 
Buckhorn, Perry County, KY. Reservoir extends upstream 
about 34 miles and lies in Leslie and Perry 
Counties, Kentucky. (See U.S. Geological Survey map 
of Buckhorn, KY.) 
16-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and 
recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill type, with gate 
controlled outlet works. Total storage capacity is 168,000 
acre-feet, of which 157,600 is for flood control. For 
further details, see page 1120 of Annual Report for 1962. 
Cost of completed new work is $11,766,206 including 
$386,707 for construction of recreation facilities under 
the completed projects program. Existing project was 
authorized by general authorization for Ohio River 
Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. 
Local cooperation. Department of Parks of the 
Commonwealth of Kentucky has undertaken management 
of lands and recreational facilities in accordance 
with license granted by Secretary of the Army on June 
29, 1962. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
Operation for flood control during 1995 flood season 
prevented damages of $1,714,000. Recreational benefits 
were $6,916,870. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction 
started in September 1956 and project was placed in 
operation in August 1960. All construction and land 
acquisition is complete. 
16. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH 
Location. Damsite is on Caesar Creek, about 3.0 
miles above its confluence with Little Miami River, in 
Warren County, OH, about 3.5 miles southeast of 
Waynesville, OH, and 10.5 miles northeast of Lebanon, 
OH. Reservoir lies in Warren, Clinton, and Green 
Counties, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of 
Oregonia, OH.) 
Existing project. Provides for construction of a 
reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes 
an earth and rockfill dam, four saddle dams, 
outlet works and an uncontrolled saddle spillway. Total 
storage capacity of reservoir is 242,200 acre-feet, of 
which 148,500 acre-feet is reserved for flood control 
storage. Estimated cost of new work(1995) is $62,893,882 
and $5,037,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water 
supply storage. Existing project was authorized by 
general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1983 
Flood Control Act. 
Local cooperation. None required. However, the 
State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of 
storage for future municipal and industrial water supply 
uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply 
storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as 
amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 
20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse 
the Federal Government for costs allocated to water 
supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after 
use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual 
amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major 
capital replacements required for the water supply 
facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
Flood damages estimated at $2,589,000 were prevented 
during the 1995 flood season. Recreational benefits 
were $29,027,369. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was 
started in January 1968 and the project was placed in 
operation January 1978. Land acquisition is complete. 
All relocation and construction features are complete. 
Project is about 99 percent complete overall. 
17. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN 
Location. Dam is on Mill Creek, 2.8 miles above its 
confluence with Eel River, in Putnam County, IN, and 
about 25 miles east of Terre Haute, IN. Reservoir 
extends upstream about 11 miles and is in Putnam and 
Owen Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of 
Poland, IN.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and 
recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill embankment. 
Total storage capacity is 228,100 acre-feet, of which 
201,000 acre-feet are for flood control. For details, see 
Annual Report for 1962, page 1136. Estimated project 
cost of new work (1995) is $4,369,997 including $155,416 
Federal funds, $113,094 contributed funds for construction 
of recreation facilities under the completed projects 
program. Existing project was selected for construction 
under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 
1938 Flood Control Act. 
Local cooperation. None required. State of Indiana 
has undertaken development and management of 
recreation facilities for use of the public in reservoir area 
in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the 
Army on January 17, 1952. A contract with the Indiana 
Department of Natural Resources for expanding the 
boat ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park, 
under the cost sharing category of the completed projects 
program was signed by the State of Indiana on August 
26,1981 and approved by the Deputy Chief of Engineers 
on March 26, 1982. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
Operation for flood control during the 1995 flood season 
prevented damages of$3,858,000. Recreational benefits 
were $8,823,168. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction 
started in July 1948 and completed in June 1953. 
Recreation facilities constructed under the cost sharing 
category of the completed projects program are completed 
except for administrative action to financially 
closeout the project. 
18. CARR FORK LAKE, KY 
Location. Damsite is 8.8 miles above mouth of Carr 
Fork, a tributary of North Fork of Kentucky River, 16 
miles upstream from Hazard, KY. The reservoir lies 
entirely within Knott County. (See U.S. Geological 
Survey maps of Carrie and Vicco, KY.) 
Existing project. Provides for construction of a 
reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is 
rock and earth fill with impervious core, 720 feet long 
and 130 feet high, with uncontrolled open cut spillway 
through left abutment. Outlet works has two control 
gates and 8-foot diameter conduit to stilling basin. Total 
16-6

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
storage capacity is 47,700 acre-feet (31,600 for flood 
control and 4,300 for water quality control). A higher 
level seasonal pool for recreation is provided. Cost of 
completed work is $50,854,826 including $76,724 for 
recreation facilities under the completed projects program. 
Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control 
Act. 
Local cooperation. None required for reservoir 
project. Division of Flood Control and Water Usage of 
Commonwealth of Kentucky gave assurance that encroachments 
on downstream channel capacity will be 
prevented. Under the terms of a new lease, the State of 
Kentucky will assume operation of the Irishman Creek 
Beach and Campground in 1996. This establishes a 
State Park at this lake also providing the impetus for 
additional resort development. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
Operation for flood control during the 1995 flood season 
prevented damages of $815,000. Recreational benefits 
were $13,522,880. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed 
in operation January 1976. Construction started in 
January 1966 is complete. 
19. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY 
Location. Damsite is on Licking River, about 4 miles 
upstream from U.S. Highway 60 near Farmers, KY, and 
7 miles southwest of Morehead, KY. Reservoir will be 
in Rowan, Bath, Morgan, and Menifee Counties, KY. 
(See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Salt Lick and 
Morehead, KY.) 
Existing project. Plan provides for construction of 
a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is 
rolled earthfill, with gate controlled outlet works and 
uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 
614,700 acre-feet (438,500 for flood control and 28,300 
for water quality control). Estimated Federal cost of 
new work (1995) is $81,162,282 of which $6,900,000 is 
U.S. Forest Service cost. Project was authorized by 
Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936 and June 28, 1938. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: An 
audit to close out the project continued. Maintenance: 
Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for 
flood control during the 1995 flood season prevented 
damages of $4,336,000. Recreation benefits were 
$10,511,247. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been in 
operation since February 1974. Constructionwas started 
in June 1965 and is about 99 percent complete. Land 
acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction 
features are complete. Administrative procedures to 
financially closeout the project are in progress. 
20. CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN 
Location. Dam is on Raccoon Creek, 32.4 miles 
above its confluence with Wabash River, and 25 miles 
northeast of Terre Haute, IN. At flood control pool, 
reservoir extends upstream about 15 miles in Parke and 
Putnam Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey 
Map of Mansfield, IN.) 
Existing project. A rolled earth dam and reservoir, 
for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage 
capacity is 132,800 acre-feet of which 116,600 acre-feet 
area for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 
1962, page 1132. Cost of completed new work is 
$6,987,807 made up of $6,260,134 for the initial project 
and $373,678 Federal cost and $353,995 non-Federal 
contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the 
completed projects program. Project was selected for 
construction under general authorization for Ohio River 
Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was 
changed from Mansfield Lake to Cecil M. Harden Lake 
by Public Law 93-521, December 14, 1974. 
Local cooperation. State of Indiana has undertaken 
management of lands and recreational facilities 
in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the 
Army on April 19, 1961. A contract with the Indiana 
Department of Natural Resources, approved by the 
Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that 
agency to design and construct certain additional recreation 
facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, 
Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the 
cost sharing category of the completed projects program. 
Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
Flood damages of $1,612,000 were prevented during the 
1995 flood season. Recreational benefits were 
$27,403,332. In 1995 5,600 tons ofriprap were placed on 
the shoreline essentially completing a 4 year project 
totalling 50,000 tons to stabilize highly eroded sections 
of the shoreline. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction 
started in October 1956 and all major items of work were 
completed December 1961. Land acquisition is complete. 
Project has been in operation since August 1960. 
Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the 
State of Indiana under the completed projects program 
are completed. 
21. CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM & 
RESERVOIR, OH 
Location. Damsite is just east of Springfield, Clark 
County, OH, at mile 7.3 of Buck Creek, a tributary of 
Mad River. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of New 
Moorefield and Springfield, OH.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and 
allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, 6,620 feet 
long and 72 feet high, with gated outlet works and open 
cut spillway with concrete chute through right abutment. 
Total storage capacity of reservoir is 63,700 acrefeet 
(32,900 for flood control and 20,800 for water 
quality control). Federal cost of completed project is 
$22,083,660. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood 
Control Act. Project name was changed from Buck 
Creek Dam and Reservoir to Clarence J. Brown Dam 
and Reservoir by Public Law 90-46, July 4, 1967. 
16-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Local cooperation. Assurances from City of Springfield, 
Springfield Conservancy District, and Clark 
County, Ohio, covering protection against detrimental 
channel encroachment below dam to mouth of Buck 
Creek, were accepted March 5, 1964. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
Flood damages of $17,000 were prevented during the 
1995 flood season. Recreation benefits were $22,807,585. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction 
started in September 1966. Land acquisition and all 
major project features were completed in November 
1973. The project was placed in operation in January 
1974. 
22. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY 
Location. Damsite is 305.7 miles above mouth of 
Green River in Taylor County, KY, about 8 miles south 
of Campbellsville. Reservoir lies in Taylor and Adair 
Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Cane 
Valley, KY.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and 
allied purposes. Dam is earth and rockfill, 141 feet high 
and 2,350 feet long. Outlet works is slide gate-controlled 
and spillway open and uncontrolled. Total 
storage capacity is 723,200 acre-feet (560,600 for flood 
control and 64,500 for low-flow augmentation). Cost of 
completed new work is $33,462,330, consisting of 
$33,105,184 initial project funds, $40,001 for water 
supply, and $317,145 Federal funds for construction of 
recreation facilities under the completed projects program. 
Existing project was authorized under general 
authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control 
Act. 
Local cooperation. None required by authorizing 
act. Taylor County, by lease approved by Secretary of 
Army February 15, 1968, undertook operation and 
maintenance of Smith Ridge public access area. In May 
1980, the lease was amended to turn back responsibility 
for maintenance and operation of 99 percent of the site 
to the Corps, with the County retaining responsibility 
for the marina area. Under provision of Water Supply 
Act of 1958, contract with City of Campbellsville for 
water supply storage was approved by Secretary of 
Army April 23, 1969. Terms require city to repay, with 
interest and annual charges for operation, maintenance 
and major replacement, the investment cost of $85,765 
allocated to its water supply storage space. Total 
payments receivedthrough fiscalyear 1984was $21,504. 
The Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of 
Kentucky, by lease approved by Secretary of Army, 
October 4, 1971, has undertaken the management of the 
Lone Valley public access area. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: A contract to remove underground storage 
tanks was completed. Routine maintenance was 
performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages 
estimated at $1,451,000 during 1995 flood season. 
Recreational benefits were $23,176,812. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction 
began in August 1965 and all major construction and 
relocation items were completed in 1972. Project has 
been in operation since February 1969. Project including 
all land acquisition complete in 1973. Construction 
of sanitary dump station for boats at Dam Site in 
conformance with EPA and State standards and rehabilitation 
of sewage treatment facilities, washhouses 
and restrooms at Smith Ridge site is complete. 
23. HUNTINGTON LAKE, IN 
Location. Damsite is on Wabash River, about 2 
miles from Huntington, IN, and 411.4 miles above 
mouth. Reservoir is in Huntington and Wells Counties, 
IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Majenica and 
Mt. Etna, IN.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and 
recreation. Dam consists of a rolled earth embankment 
4,700 feet long and 89 feet high, a concrete spillway and 
outlet section 155 feet long, and a concrete gravity 
section 310 feet long. Spillway is controlled by three 
gates, and outlet works by six sluices. Project also 
provides local flood protection for Markle, IN. Total 
storage capacity of reservoir is 153,100 acre-feet, of 
which 149,000 acre-feet is reserved for flood control 
storage. Estimated cost for new work (1995) is 
$19,622,258 made up of $19,273,001 Federal cost for the 
initial project and $193,903 non-Federal contributed 
funds for low flow augmentation storage, and $155,354 
non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities 
under the completed projects program. Project was 
authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 
in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first 
cost. State of Indiana has met this obligation. Contract 
with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, 
approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974, 
provided for that agency to design and construct certain 
additional recreational facilities at Cecil M. Harden, 
Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes 
under the cost shared category of the completed projects 
program. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated 
at $973,000 during 1995 flood control season. 
Recreation benefits were$10,251,867. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition 
and all major construction complete. Project was placed 
in operation January 9, 1969. Cost shared recreation 
facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the 
completed projects program are complete. 
24. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN 
Location. Damsite is 7.1 miles above mouth of 
Mississinewa River, which flows into Wabash River 
about 2 miles upstream from Peru, IN. At flood control 
pool level, reservoir extends upstream about 28 miles, in 
Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, IN. (See U.S. 
Geological Survey map of Peoria, IN.) 
16-8

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
Existing project. Provides for construction of a 
reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes 
an earthfill dam 137 feet high and 8,100 feet long, 
gate-controlled outlet works, and an uncontrolled open 
spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity 
of reservoir is 368,400 acre-feet, of which 345,100 
acre-feet are reserved for flood control storage. Cost for 
completed new work is $24,379,800 made up of 
$23,791,816 Federal cost for the initial project, $239,200 
non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation 
storage. $174,392 Federal cost and $174,392 non- 
Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities 
under the completed projects program. Project was 
authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 
in cash an amount equal to 1 percent of project first cost. 
State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract 
with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, 
approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, 
provided for that agency to design and construct certain 
additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, 
Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes 
under the cost sharing category of the completed projects 
program. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
Operation for flood control prevented damages of 
$1,716,000 during 1995 flood season. Recreation benefits 
were $21,140,372. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction and 
land acquisition is complete. Project was placed in 
operation in May 1968. Cost shared recreation facilities 
constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed 
projects program are complete. 
25. MONROE LAKE, IN 
Location. Dam is on Salt Creek, a tributary of White 
River, 25.9 miles above mouth, and 2 miles each of 
Harrodsburg, Monroe County, IN. At flood control pool 
level, reservoir will extend upstream 44 miles in Monroe, 
Brown, and Jackson Counties. (See U.S. Geological 
Survey map of Clear Creek, IN.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and 
allied purposes. Dam is earth core and rock shell, with 
gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open 
spillway. Total storage capacity is 441,000 acre-feet 
(258,800 for flood control arid 159,900 for low flow 
augmentation.) Cost of completed new work is 
$16,570,774 consisting of $7,032,484 Federal funds, 
$7,797,604 non-Federal contributed funds for low-flow 
regulation storage and $870,343 Federal cost and 
$870,343 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation 
facilities under the completed projects program. 
Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, 
modifying comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. 
Local cooperation. Section 3, 1944 Flood Control 
Act applies. Local interests must contribute 54.1 percent 
of project cost, this being the proportion allocated 
to low-flow regulation feature, plus a capitalized amount 
representing that part of average annual maintenance 
and operation cost allocated to low-flow regulation. 
State of Indiana assumed this cost sharing obligation. A 
contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, 
approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 
1974, provided for that agency to design and construct 
certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, 
Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes 
under the cost sharing category of the completed projects 
program. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work. None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
Operation for flood control prevented damages of 
$2,794,000 during 1995 flood season. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete 
and was placed in operation in February 1965. Cost 
shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of 
Indiana under the completed projects program are 
complete. 
26. NOLIN LAKE, KY 
Location. Dam is on Nolin River 7.8 miles above its 
confluence with Green River, about 70 air miles southwest 
of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream 
about 57 miles and is in Edmonson, Grayson, Hart, and 
Hardin Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey 
maps of Nolin Reservoir and Dickeys Mill, KY.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and 
allied purposes. Dam is rockfill-earth core type with 
gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open 
spillway. Total storage capacity is 609,400 acre-feet, of 
which 545,600 acre-feet is for flood control. For further 
details of project, see Annual Report for 1962, page 
1124. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1995) is 
$17,193,278 including $2,594,274 for construction of 
recreation facilities. Project was selected for construction 
under general authorization for Ohio River Basin 
in 1938 Flood Control Act. 
Local cooperation. None required for authorized 
project. State of Kentucky contributed $18,195 for 
increased width of dam for public road. Kentucky has 
assumed responsibility of the Brier Creek site to establish 
a State Park in 1996. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
During the 1995 flood season estimated damages of 
$2,388,000 were prevented. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction 
started in January 1959. Project was completed and 
placed in operation in March 1963. 
27. OHIO RIVER BASIN 
(Louisville District) 
Location. Works covered by this project are a series 
of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs 
in Ohio River Basin within Louisville District. 
Existing project. Individual projects considered in 
comprehensive plan within the Louisville District. (See 
Table 16-B for authorizing legislation and Table 16-I for 
cost and listing of projects in the basin plan.) 
16-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Operations during fiscal year. No costs were 
incurred except for these projects for which individual 
reports are given. 
28. PATOKA LAKE, IN 
Location. Damsite is in Dubois County, IN, 118.3 
miles above mouth of Patoka River, and 50 miles westnorthwest 
of New Albany, IN. Reservoir extends into 
Dubois, Orange, and Crawford Counties. (See Geological 
Survey map of Cuzco, IN.) 
Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and 
allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock fill, 1,550 feet 
long and 85 feet high, with gate-controlled outlet works 
and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity 
is 301,600 acre-feet (121,000 for flood control and 167,500 
for water supply and water quality control). Estimated 
cost of new work (1995) is $73,664,159 of which 
$53,095,790 is Federal cost for other construction, and 
$20,568,369 is non-Federal contribution for water supply 
storage and recreation facilities. Project was authorized 
by 1965 Flood Control Act, and emergency measures 
and snagging and clearing the Patoka River 
downstream of Patoka Lake to ensure effective operation 
of the project for flood control was directed by 1981 
Appropriation Act for Energy and Water Development. 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required to 
reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated 
to water supply storage is initiated, presently estimated 
at 29.316 percent of the joint-use facilities cost, exclusive 
of interests, plus $287,000 for the cost of operating 
and maintaining water supply storage for a period of 50 
years, plus $42,000 for the cost of major capital replacements 
required for water supply storage space for a 
period of 50 years. Local interests are also required to 
pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through 
user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first 
cost of the project allocated to recreation. Present laws 
of the State of Indiana require that agency to make cash 
contributions during construction of the project. Local 
interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on 
channel of Patoka River from dam to mouth, and to pay 
allocated initial and annual maintenance and operation 
costs for water supply storage. Formal assurances of 
local cooperation, executed by the Indiana Natural 
Resources Commission, were accepted August 27, 1970. 
Contracts with State of Indiana for water supply and 
recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army 
November 2, 1970. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
Operation for flood control during the 1995 flood season 
prevented damage estimated at $1,887,000. Recreational 
benefits were $20,741,103. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was 
started in July 1972. Engineering studies are complete. 
Real Estate relocation work is about 99 percent complete. 
All major features are complete. Permanent 
impoundment was started in February 1978 and the 
project was placed in operation about August 1980. The 
project is about 99 percent complete overall. 
29. ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND 
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KY 
Location. Dam is on Rough River, 89.3 miles above 
its confluence with Green River, 160.3 miles above Ohio 
River, and about 60 miles southwest of Louisville, KY. 
Reservoir extends upstream about 30 miles and is in 
Breckinridge, Hardin, and Grayson Counties, KY. 
Channel improvement work is on Rough River, Barnett 
Creek, and West Fork of Barnett Creek. (See U.S. 
Geological Survey maps of McDaniels and Falls of 
Rough, KY.) 
Existing project. Reservoir is for flood control and 
allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill type, with gatecontrolled 
outlet works. Storage capacity is 334,380 
acre-feet, of which 314,210 acre-feet is for flood control. 
Project also includes channel clearing of lower Rough 
River, and channel improvement on Barnett Creek, a 
tributary of Rough River. For further details, see page 
1126 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new 
work is $10,643,001 including $890,008 Federal funds 
and $22,612 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation 
facilities under the completed projects program. 
Existing project was selected for construction under 
general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 
Flood Control Act. Modification of previously approved 
plan to include channel improvement items was authorized 
by the 1944 Flood Control Act. 
Local cooperation. None required for construction 
of reservoir unit. Provisions of Section 3, Flood Control 
Act of 1936, are applicable to channel improvements. 
Assurances were obtained from Ohio County for channel 
improvement. Department of Parks, Commonwealth 
of Kentucky, has undertaken management of 
certain lands and recreation facilities in accordance 
with license granted by Secretary of the Army on 
August 18, 1961. A contract with the Commonwealth of 
Kentucky to improve and pave road at the Below Dam 
Area - State Park under the cost sharing category of the 
completed projects program was approved by the Secretary 
of the Army November 4, 1977. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
Operation for flood control during the 1995 flood season 
prevented damages estimated at $3,949,000. Recreational 
benefits were $60,825,175. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction 
started in November 1955 and reservoir was placed in 
operation in June 1959. Land acquisition and all major 
items of construction and relocation are complete. 
30. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN 
Location. Damsite is 3.1 miles above mouth of 
Salamonie River which enters Wabash River about 6 
miles upstream from Wabash, IN. Reservoir extends 
upstream about 27 miles at flood control pool and lies in 
Wabash and Huntington Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological 
Survey maps of Lagro and Majenica, IN.) 
Existing project. Provides for construction of a 
reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It in- 
16-10

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
cludes an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 133 
feet and length of 6,100 feet, gate-controlled outlet 
works with a 16-foot-diameter conduit and an uncontrolled 
open spillway through right abutment. Total 
storage capacity of reservoir is 263,600 acre-feet, of 
which 250,500 acre-feet is for flood control storage. 
Estimated project cost for new work (1995) is $17,046,151 
made up of $16,244,356 Federal cost for the initial 
project and $170,697 non-Federal contributed funds for 
low-flow augmentation storage and $315,549 Federal 
cost and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for 
recreation facilities under the completed projects program. 
Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 
1958. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 
in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first 
cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A 
contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, 
approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 
1974, provided for that agency to design and construct 
certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, 
Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe, and Salamonie 
Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed 
projects program. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
During the 1995 flood season, operation for flood control 
prevented damages of $1,042,000. Recreation benefits 
were $16,671,063. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition 
and all major construction and relocation contracts are 
complete. Reservoir was placed in operation in spring 
1967. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by 
the State of Indiana under the completed projects program 
are complete. 
31. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY 
Location. Damsite is in Spencer County, KY, 60.0 
miles above the confluence of Salt River and Ohio River, 
4 river miles above Taylorsville and 36.9 river miles 
above Shepherdsville, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey 
map of Taylorsville, KY.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and 
allied purposes. Dam will be an earth and rock fill 
structure, 164 feet high and 1,280 feet long. Outlet 
works will be slide gate controlled and spillway will be 
uncontrolled open cut. Total storage capacity will be 
291,670 acre-feet (211,230 for flood control, winter 
months), and 52,245 for water quality and fish and 
wildlife. Estimated cost of new work (1995) is 
$122,090,000 made up of $92,980,000 Federal cost for 
the initial project and $17,020,000 non-Federal contributed 
funds for initial recreation facilities and $6,045,000 
Federal cost and $6,045,000 non-Federal contributed 
funds for recreation facilities under the completed 
projects program. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood 
Control Act. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to 
administer project land and water areas for recreation; 
pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through 
user fees) with interest one-half of the separable first 
costs of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs 
of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation 
lands and facilities. Local interests must also 
agree to prevent encroachments on flow-carrying capacities 
of stream channels below the reservoir to the 
extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir 
operation. Commonwealth of Kentucky has indicated 
intent to fulfill requirements for recreation cost sharing 
and has assumed responsibility for channel encroachments 
and pollution control. The Commonwealth furnished 
assurance agreements covering prevention of 
encroachment on capacity of stream channels in April 
and May 1973 and executed the recreation cost sharing 
contract in April 1973. On April 2, 1980, the U.S. 
District Court for the Western District of Kentucky 
ruled that the 1973 recreation cost sharing contract 
between the Commonwealth and the United States that 
provided for repayment after completion was invalid 
under the Kentucky Constitution which prohibits one 
General Assembly from obligating future appropriations 
that would be binding on a subsequent legislature. 
In response to the Court's ruling, the Commonwealth 
and the United States entered into a new contract 
providing for cash contributions. Contract was approved 
by the Secretary ofthe Army June 11, 1980. The 
contract was found to be valid and enforceable by the 
Court July 14, 1980. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: A 
contract to remove debris from Taylorsville Lake was 
completed. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was 
performed. During the 1995 flood season operation for 
flood control prevented damages of $2,534,000. Recreation 
benefits were $13,049,662. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Engineering and 
design studies are complete except for design of a 
comfort station. Land acquisition is 100 percent complete. 
Construction was started in June 1974. All major 
construction items are complete except recreation facilities. 
The dam gates were closed in January 1983 for 
permanent impoundment. Dedication ceremony was 
May 28, 1983. Contracts were awarded to fix two 
washed out sections of County roadway on project 
property. The culverts will be replaced and the road bed 
rebuilt in those areas.The project is about 99 percent 
complete overall. 
32. WABASH RIVER BASIN 
Location. Works covered by this project are located 
in the Wabash River Basin, a drainage area of 33,100 
square miles, covering parts of Indiana, Illinois, and 
Ohio. 
Existing project. One local protection project and 
five reservoir projects were authorized for this basin 
plan. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation and 
Table 16-J for project list and total cost of basin plan.) 
33. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK 
LAKE, OH 
Location. Dam is on West Fork of Mill Creek 6.5 miles 
16-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
above its junction with Mill Creek and 2 miles northeast 
of Mount Health, OH, and 10 miles north of downtown 
Cincinnati. Reservoir extends upstream about 3 miles 
and is in Hamilton County, OH. (See U. S. Geological 
Survey map of Glendale, OH.) 
Existing project. An earth embankment dam and 
a reservoir for flood control, recreation, and reduction of 
pumping requirements at Mill Creek barrier dam in 
Cincinnati. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 11,300 
acre-feet, of which 9,850 acre-feet is for flood control. 
For further details, see page 1119 of Annual Report for 
1962. Cost of completed new work is $4,722,463 made 
up of $3,092,941 Federal cost for the initial project, 
$520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and 
dam, $50,000 non-Federal contributed funds in fulfillment 
of project authorization and $529,361 Federal cost 
and $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation 
facilities under the completed projects program. 
Existing project selected for construction under additional 
authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1946 Flood 
Control Act. 
Local cooperation. Local interests were to release 
necessary land under their control and give assurance 
that future channel encroachment below damsite would 
be prevented. For enlargement of reservoir to include 
a conservation pool, local interests would contribute 
one-half additional cost of such pool, including one-half 
cost of relocation of sanitary sewer, and agree to hold the 
United States free from damages resulting from its 
provision. Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton 
County, Ohio, adopted a resolution October 8, 1947, 
signifying willingness to fulfill requirements including 
provision of conservation pool. Assurances were executed 
on same date. A contract with the United States 
for relocation of sanitary sewer outside reservoir area in 
order to include conservation pool in project was accepted 
by Hamilton County, in which the United States 
paid one-half cost of such relocation work. Hamilton 
County Commissioners furnished $50,000, required as 
a local contribution toward additional cost of providing 
conservation pool. Hamilton County Park District has 
undertaken development and management of recreation 
facilities in reservoir area for use of the public in 
accordance with the license granted by Secretary of the 
Army on October 31, 1951. Contract for cost shared 
recreation development under the completed works 
program was executed by the Board of Park Commissioners, 
Hamilton County Park District, Ohio, in September 
1975 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in 
December 1975. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. 
Operation for flood control during 1995 flood season 
prevented damages estimated at $1,451,000. The 
Hamilton County Park District began a major water 
quality project for West Fork in 1995. The lake is being 
dredged to restore areas filled with sediment from 
upstream runoff. The project should be completed in 
1996. Recreation benefits were $18,237,711. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction 
started in March 1949 and reservoir was placed in 
operation in December 1952. Project is complete. Cost 
shared recreation development under the completed 
projects program is complete. 
34. WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH 
Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Miami 
River between Batavia and Williamsburg, OH, about 
6.0 miles above Batavia and 32.6 miles above mouth of 
the Little Miami River. Entire project lies in Clermont 
County, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of 
Batavia,OH.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and 
allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, outlet 
works, an uncontrolled saddle spillway, and a dike to 
close a saddle north of spillway. Total storage capacity 
of reservoir is 294,800 acre-feet, of which 210,600 acrefeet 
is reserved for flood control storage. Cost of complete 
new workis $52,023,157 and a estimated $3,485,840 
non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. 
Existing project was authorized by general authorization 
for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. 
Project name was changed from East Fork Lake to 
William H. Harsha Lake effective January 4, 1981, by 
Public Law 96-383, October 6, 1980. 
Local cooperation. None required. However, the 
State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of 
storage for future municipal and industrial water supply 
uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply 
storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as 
amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 
20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse 
the Federal Government for costs allocated to water 
supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after 
use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual 
amount for cost of operation, maintenance, and major 
capital replacements required for the water supply 
facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 
Maintenance: A new water intake structure was completed 
in 1995 to support a regional public water supply 
system. Operation for flood control during 1995 flood 
season prevented damages estimated at $739,000. Recreation 
benefits were $35,346,900. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was 
started in May 1970. Project is complete and reservoir 
was placed in operation in February 1978. 
35. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent 
acts require local interests to maintain and operate local 
protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed 
by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were 
made to determine extent of compliance and to advise 
interests as necessary to measures required to correct 
deficiencies. (See Table 16-K for the latest dates of 
inspection performed on the local protection projects, 
channel improvements, and bank revetments). 
Fiscal year costs were $182,217. Total costs to September 
30, 1995, were $4,145,411. 
16-12

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
36. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
See Table 16-E. 
37. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public 
Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. 
Costs for fiscal year were $450,832 for disaster preparedness 
and $7,294 for emergency operations. 
Small navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, 
1960 River and Harbor and Flood Control Act, Public 
Law 86-645, 86th Congress, as amended. Costs for fiscal 
year were $15,011. 
See Table 16-L. 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 
Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as 
amended. Costs for fiscal year were $8,441,180 for for 
nine feasibility repors, $134,980 for Plans & Specifications 
on four projects, $1,113,224 for two projects under 
construction, and $67,477 for five studies that were 
terminated. 
See Table 16-L. 
Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood 
Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress. Costs for 
fiscal year were $69,675 for Planning and Design Analysis 
on five projects, $548,383 for three projects under 
construction, $422,548 on projects completing construction, 
and $5,670 for one study which was terminated. 
See Table 16-L. 
General Investigations 
38. SURVEYS 
Fiscal year costs was $1,818,538 for two Navigation 
Studies; $1,662,278 for nineteen Flood Damage Prevention 
Studies; $3,290 for one Special Studies; and $130,283 
for four Miscellaneous Activities. 
Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 16-M, 
page 16-36. 
39. PRECONSTRUCTION 
ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
Fiscal year costs were $3,763,416 for four Navigation 
Projects; $3,514,744for fourFlood Control Projects; and 
$83,935 for one Environmental Infrastructure Project. 
Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 16-M, 
page 16-36. 
40. COORDINATION WITH OTHER 
AGENCIES 
Fiscal year total cost was $12,444 for Coordination 
With Other Agencies; and $16,154 for Planning Assistance 
to States. 
Refleects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 16- 
M, page 16-36. 
41. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
BASIC DATA 
Fiscal year total cost was $152,462 for seven Flood 
Plain Management Services; and $10,097 for Hydologic 
Studies. 
Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 16-m, 
page 16-36. 
16-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total to 
in Text Project Fundng 1992 1993 1994 1995 Sep 30,1995 
Navigation - Channels and Harbors 
1 Open Channel Work, New Work 
Licking River Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Navigation - Locks and Dams 
3 Green and Barren New Work 
Rivers, KY Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
4 Kentucky River, KY New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Minor Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Flood Control, Local Protection 
8 Evansville, IN 
9 Frankfort, South 
Frankfort, KY 
Levee Unit 5, 
Wabash River, IN 
10 Mill Creek, OH 
11 Salyersville, KY 
12 Southwestern 
Jefferson County, 
KY 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
$ 
14,700 17,000 19,000 
14,700 17,000 19,000 
7,700 
6,991 
126,711 
126,002 
- - - - 13,808,222 1 
- - - - 13,808,222 1 
1,088,367 1,244,000 1,670,500 1,957,800 40,439,050 2,3 
1,246,490 1,215,283 1,440,566 2,128,204 40,339,435 
- - - - 4,176,749 
- - - - 4,176,749 
725,500 4,902,000 3,633,000 4,188,950 68,741,291 4.s 
873,149 2,194,906 5,169,130 4,307,266 67,672,011 4, s 
- - - - 556,956 
- - - - 556,956 
305,000 319,000 209,204 (11,000) 44,011,247 6 
652,605 601,289 136,012 33,407 43,839,946 ' 
- 702,000 2,328,000 3,224,579 6,254,579 8 
- 175,595 1,763,555 2,419,779 4,358,929 
100,000 
3,538 
4,000 
78,205 
0 (27,523) 7,517,464 
22,234 (27,500) 7,517,464 
6,396,000 1,950,000 1,331,000 (25,000) 97,100,742 
6,715,773 1,293,951 898,196 382,865 96,323,127 
280,000 244,000 1,156,000 
317,890 205,620 226,818 
0 2,080,000 
459,544 1,407,355 
1,300,000 160,000 15,000 88,900 60,181,083 
2,293,877 427,592 49,796 134,807 60,144,617 
16-14

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
TABLE 16-A 
CONTINUED 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total to 
in Text Project Fundng 1992 1993 1994 1995 Sep 30,1995 
Flood Control- Reservoirs 
13 Barren River Lake, KY New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
14 Brookville Lake, IN 
15 Buckhorn Lake, KY 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
16 Caesar Creek Lake, OH New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
17 Cagles Mill Lake, IN 
18 Carr Fork Lake, KY 
19 Cave Run Lake, KY 
20 Cecil M. Hardin Lake, 
IN 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
dost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
$ - $ - $ - $ - $27,479,717 9 
- - - - 27,479,717 9 
1,284,757 1,485,000 1,871,300 1,713,600 26,693,621 10,11,12 
1,302,491 1,472,992 1,801,474 1,846,773 26,643,153 10,11,12 
- 45,402,565 13 
- 45,402,565 13 
599,227 606,000 683,700 641,500 8,955,724 
815,199 597,583 649,935 669,835 8,924,677 
- - - - 11,766,206 14 
- - - - 11,766,206 14 
972,780 994,000 1,184,900 1,210,700 16,793,923 15 
966,271 973,391 1,055,918 1,309,564 16,668,078 15 
- - - - 62,893,882 
- - - - 62,881,010 
736,474 849,600 1,135,900 1,101,100 11,240,008 
713,160 856,955 1,132,741 1,100,820 11,189,321 
(6,281) - 4,369,997 16 
- 4,369,997 17 
400,200 496,800 603,000 568,850 9,026,667 
440,382 467,261 589,054 608,793 9,015,958 
- - - - 50,854,826 18 
- - - - 50,854,826 18 
928,118 1,043,500 1,174,200 1,228,300 15,327,785 19 
998,174 1,045,586 1,140,762 1,251,995 15,269,545 19 
- 81,162,282 20 
- 81,159,541 20 
612,188 656,000 816,400 793,900 9,816,221 
616,762 642,959 745,670 848,873 9,774,163 
- - - - 6,987,807 21 
- - - - 6,987,807 21 
609,800 777,000 911,500 656,300 11,528,640 
633,745 748,549 889,173 672,147 11,489,144 
16-15 
7,885

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 16-A 
CONTINUED 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total to 
in Text Project Fundng 1992 1993 1994 1995 Sep 30,1995 
21 Clarence J. Brown 
Dam & Reservoir, 
OH 
22 Green River Lake, KY 
23 Huntington Lake, IN 
24 Mississinewa Lake, IN 
25 Monroe Lake, IN 
26 Nolin Lake, KY 
27 Ohio River Basin 
Louisville District 
28 Patoka Lake, IN 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
$ 22,083,660 
22,083,660 
425,331 567,000 691,000 745,700 8,291,345 
448,396 554,885 677,985 748,984 8,250,806 
- - - - 33,462,330 22 
- - - - 33,462,330 22 
1,105,383 1,197,500 1,589,000 1,571,600 22,297,394 23 
1,161,530 1,218,313 1,414,932 1,722,253 22,202,962 23 
- (251) 
-.- 
- 19,622,258 24 
- 19,621,777 25 
445,848 556,000 589,500 621,400 9,753,288 
462,027 556,052 590,916 619,904 9,735,221 
(1,329) - 24,379,800 26 
- 24,379,800 26 
635,777 825,000 903,800 596,250 9,600,343 
644,908 856,845 873,995 569,460 9,533,673 
- - - - 16,570,774 27 
- - - - 16,570,774 27 
688,250 664,000 793,000 639,900 10,869,318 28 
662,999 702,023 780,242 654,247 10,849,574 28 
(103) - 17,193,275 29 
- 17,193,278 30 
1,614,400 1,507,500 1,820,900 1,962,000 30,559,974 31 
1,678,145 1,499,192 1,794,697 1,982,479 30,435,518 31 
- 1,526,142 
- 1,526,142 
- 73,664,159 32 
- 148 - 73,316,892 3 
398,861 481,000 506,889 476,600 6,414,846 
443,840 479,151 482,217 499,318 6,393,615 
16-16

TABLE 16-A 
CONTINUED 
LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total to 
in Text Project Fundng 1992 1993 1994 1995 Sep 30,1995 
29 Rough River Lake & New Work 
Channel Improvment, Approp. $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,643,001 34 
KY Cost - - - - 10,643,001 34 
Maint. 
Approp. 1,090,955 1,320,800 1,713,500 1,758,450 28,106,417 35 
Cost 1,284,058 1,289,222 1,435,547 1,911,576 27,899,739 35 
30 Salamonie Lake, IN New Work 
Approp. - - - - 17,046,151 36 
Cost - - - - 17,039,321 37 
Maint. 
Approp. 497,300 522,000 711,000 548,400 8,961,720 
Cost 515,770 516,391 688,567 550,204 8,915,942 
31 Taylorsville Lake, KY New Work 
Approp. 160,000 60,000 (13,715) 292,000 87,092,594 38 
Cost 634,371 89,737 (624) 76,381 86,648,259 3 
Maint. 
Approp. 664,903 823,500 1,286,750 1,507,550 8,950,674 
Cost 672,843 810,081 1,028,646 1,475,546 8,614,707 
33 West Fork of Mill New Work 
Creek Lake, OH Approp. - - - - 4,722,463 40 
Cost - - - - 4,722,463 40 
Maint. 
Approp. 292,967 380,000 504,500 469,500 7,025,403 
Cost 311,550 384,168 475,741 477,211 6,989,560 
34 William H. Harsha New Work 
Lake, OH Approp. - - - - 52,023,157 41 
Cost - - - - 52,023,157 41 
Maint. 
Approp. 592,500 656,000 678,350 734,850 8,195,637 
Cost 604,544 667,899 659,975 704,208 8,114,940 
1 Includes $85,000 public works funds. 
2 Includes $2,000 emergency relief funds, $204,444 
"maintenance and operation of dams and improvements of 
navigable waters" and $3,842,667 expended from 1888 to 
30 June 1936, for operation and care from permanent 
indefinite appropriation. 
3 Includes $725,715 from Productive Employment 
Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 
4 Includes $316,871 under maintenance and 
operation of dams and other improvements of navigable 
waters", and $6,405,372 expended between July 5, 1885 
and June 30, 1937 on operation and care from permanent 
indefinite appropriation. 
6 Includes $149,700 from Productive Employment 
Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 
6 Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds and 
$63,187 contributed funds. 
7 Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds and 
$63,169 contributed funds. 
8 Includes $1,180,579 in contributed non-Federal 
funds. 
s Includes $2,224,948 Code 711 funds, $110,107 Code 
713 Federal funds and $108,418 Code 713 non-Federal 
funds. 
10 Includes $100,000 Supplemental funds. 
11 Includes $326,900 Special Recreation Use Fees. 
12 Includes $668,025 "maintenance & operation of 
dams and other improvements of navigable water". 
13 Includes $7,497,492 contributed funds and $100,706 
Code 711 funds. 
14 Includes $61,451 public work acceleration executive 
1963 funds, $143,088 Code 711 funds, and $243,619 Code 
712 funds. 
15 Includes $52,240 Special Recreation Use Fees. 
16-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
CONTINUED 
16 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $113,321 Code 
713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 
17 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $113,321 Code 
713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 
18 Includes $76,724 Code 711 funds. 
19 Includes $51,854 Special Recreation Use Fees. 
20 Includes $6,900,000 of U.S. Forest Service Funds. 
21 Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds, $353,995 Code 
713 funds, & 353,995 non-Federal contributions in kind 
for recreation facilities. 
22 Includes $133,413 Code 711 funds, $183,732 Code 
713 funds, and $40,001 contributed funds. 
23 Includes $114,280 Special Recreation Use Fees and 
$664,025 under "maintenance and operation of dams and 
other improvements of navigable water". 
24 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,903 
contributed funds. 
25 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,422 
contributed funds. 
26 Includes $215,000 Code 711 funds, $174,392 Code 
713 funds, $239,200 contributed funds and $174,392 non- 
Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 
27 Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds, $869,158 Code 713 
funds, $7,797,604 contributed funds and $870,343 non- 
Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 
28 Includes $54,460 from Productive Employment 
Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 
29 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration 
executive 1963 funds and $2,594,274 Code 711 funds. 
3o Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 
1963 funds and $2,594,274 Code 711 funds. 
31 Includes $204,920 Special Recreation Use Fees, 
$52,000 Supplement Funds, and $527,225 "maintenance 
and operation of dams and other improvements of 
navigable water". 
32 Includes $20,568,369 contributed funds. 
*3 Includes $20,266,598 contributed funds. 
34 Includes $196,306 public works acceleration 
executive 1963 funds, $867,396 Code 711 funds, $22,612 
Code 713 funds, and $22,612 contributed funds. 
35 Includes $236,640 Special Recreation Use Fees and 
$668,025 under "maintenance and operation of dams and 
other improvements of navigable water". 
36 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $170,697 
contributed funds and $315,549 non-Federal contribution 
in kind for recreation facilities. 
37 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $163,867 
contributed funds and $315,549 non-Federal contribution 
in kind for recreation facilities. 
38 Includes $4,115,116 contributed funds. 
9 Includes $4,001,726 contributed funds. 
40 Includes $529,361 Code 713 funds, $50,000 
contributed funds, $529,361 non-Federal contribution in 
kind for recreation facilities, and $520,800 non-Federal 
cost for sewer relocation and dam. 
41 Includes $58,571 for preconstruction planning, 
engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 
16-18

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Aug 11, 1888 
Mar 3, 1893 1 
Jul 13, 1892 
Jul 13, 1902 
Mar 3, 1905 2 
Mar 3, 1909 
Jul 3, 19302 
Jun 26, 1934 3 
Aug 30, 1935 2 
Sep 3, 1954 
Aug 28, 1937 
Jun 28, 1938 
Aug 18, 1941 
Dec 22, 1944 
Jul 24, 1946 
May 17, 1950 
Jul 3, 1958 
GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) 
Purchase of original improvement H. 
Con2s,t rucGtiorn een Rivoefr Lock A 
Construction of Lock 5, Green RiverA 
Construction of Lock 6, Green River A 
Construction of Lock 6, Green River A 
Appropriated $5,000 for continuing improvements of Green River 
above mouth of Big Barren River, with provision "That the Secretary 
of War may, in his discretion, expend such portion of said amount as 
may be necessary for removal of snags in Nolin River." 
Construct new Lock 1 and new Lock and Dam 2, Green River S. 
Construct new locks at Dam 5, Green River and Dam 1, Ri 
Barren River; modification of Dam 5, Green River, 
widens bends in Bear Creek, KY 
2 
Operation and care of locks and dams with War 
Department Appropriations for rivers and harbors 
Improvement of Nolin River H. 
Channel enlargement of lower 103 miles of Green River revocation of S.] 
authorities for improvement of Bear Creek and Nolin River 
OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (See Section 27 of Text) 
Construct levee, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection 
of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin, projects to be selected 
by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War, at a cost 
not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction 
Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes I 
in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary 
of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial 
accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50.3 
million for local protection works, individual projects to be selected and 
approved by Chief of Engineers, subject to provision that authorization 
shall include diversion of Cache River above Cairo, Illinois, and protection 
of area north of Cairo drainage district by levees at an estimated cost 
of $2 million 
Additional $45 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan 
for Ohio River Basin 
Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan 
for Ohio River Basin, including plan of improvement for flood control 
and other purposes in Kentucky River Basin 
Flood protection wqrks at Taylorsville, KY at an estimated cost of $129,350 
Channel improvement of lower Rough River and Barnett Creek at an 
estimated cost of $360,000 
Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan, 
including plan of improvement for flood control in Wabash River 
Basin, Illinois, and Indiana, at an estimated cost of $9,629,000 
Also, West Fork of Mill Creek at an estimated cost of $1,527,000. 
Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio 
River Basin, including necessary bank stabilization measures at New 
Harmony Bridge, Indiana, at an estimated cost of $500,000. 
Flood control Act of 1958 modified comprehensive plan to provide for 
Monroe Reservoir on Salt Creek, White River Basin, Indiana, at an 
estimated cost to the United States of $4,350,000; cost to local 
interests, $5,141,000. 
Doc 
Sess., 
mnual 
111, 49th Cong., 2d 
Ann. Rept. 1887, p. 190 3 
Report, 1891, p. 2439 
mnual Report, 1891, p. 2478 
Doc. 82, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 
vers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 2, 71st Cong., 1st Sess., 
mand H. Doc. 685, 69th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
D. 480, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. 
D. 82, 83d Congress, 2d Sess. 
Flood Control Committee 
Document 1, 75th Congress, 
1st Session 
Flood Control Committee 
Document 1, 75th Congress, 
1st Session 
H. Doc. 504, 78th Congress, 
2d Session 
S.D. 105, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H.D. 535, 78th Congress 
2d Session 
H.D. 197, 80th Congress 
1st Session 
H.D. 198, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H.D. 192, 85th Congress, 
1st Session 
16-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
CONTINUED 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Oct 23, 1962 
Dec 30, 1963 
Jun 18, 1965 
May 12, 1967 
Aug 13, 1968 
Jun 19, 1970 
Mar 7, 1974 
Aug 13, 1968 
Dec 29, 1981 
Nov 17, 1986 
Nov 17, 1988 
Nov 28, 1990 
Nov 17, 1986 
Flood Control Act of 1962 deleted Jessamine Creek Reservoir on H.D. 423, 87th Congress, 
Kentucky River, Kentucky, from comprehensive plan for 2d Session 
Ohio River Basin 
Additional $150 million for further prosecution of Pub. Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 
comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 1st Session 
Additional $89 million for further prosecution of Public Law 89-42, 89th Cong., 
comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 1st Session 
Additional $38 million for further prosecution of Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., 
comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 1st Session 
Additional $35 million for further prosecution of Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 
comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 2d Session 
Additional $69 million for further prosecution of Public Law 91-282, 91st Cong., 
comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 2d Session 
Additional $120 million for further prosecution of Public Law 93-251, 93rd 
comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Congress, 2d Session 
Fifty-four local protection projects and one reservoir project in 
comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized 
August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources 
Development Act of 1974 
Two additional local protection projects in comprehensive plan for 
Ohio River Basin were deauthorized November 6, 1977, under 
Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 
WABASH RIVER BASIN (See Section 32 of Text) 
Construction of five multipurpose reservoirs and one local protection S.D. 96, 90th Congress, 
project in Wabash River Basin, IL & IN, with provision that construction 2d Session 
of Big Walnut Lake, IN, project must be approved by the President. 
Authorization of $50 million for initiation of partial accomplishment 
of project 
Two multiple purpose reservoirs in Wabash River were deauthorized. Public Law 97-128, 97th 
Congress, 2d Session 
MIAMI RIVER BASIN, PLEASANT RUN, VICINITY 
FAIRFIELD, OH 
Three dry bed reservoirs and a channel improvement were authorized Public Law 99-662, 99th 
in Section 401 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. Congress, 2d Session 
HAZARD, KENTUCKY 
Approximately 6 miles of channel improvement were authorized in Public Law 100-676, 100th 
Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Congress, 2d Session 
Flood control measures to prevent a January 1957 flood reoccurrance in Public Law 101-640, 101st 
the vicinity of Hazard, Kentucky at a total cost of $30,000,000 was 2nd Session 
authorized for design and construction in Section 108 of the Water 
Resource Development Act of 1990. 
SALYERSVILLE, KENTUCKY 
Flood control measures to prevent a December 1978 flood reoccurrence Public Law 99-662, 
in the vicinity of Salyersville, Kentucky at a total project cost of 99th Congress, 2d Session 
$7,000,000 wasauthorized for design and construction in section 401(e)(1) 
of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. With respect to the 
project, Congress has determined that the benefits exceed the cost of 
such flood control measures. 
16-20

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
TABLE 16-B 
CONTINUED 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Provided $400,000 to construct the Salyersville, Kentucky cut-through as 
authorized by PL 99-662 401(e)(1) in accordance with the Special Project 
Report for Salyersville, Kentucky, concurred in by the Ohio River Division 
Engineer on or about July 26, 1989. 
Provided $600,000 to continue construction of the Salyersville, Kentucky 
cut-through as authorized by PL 99-662 section 401(e)(1) in accordance 
with the Special Project Report for Salyersville, Kentucky, concurred in 
by the Ohio River Division Engineer on or about July 26, 1989. 
Public Law 101-514, 101st 
Congress, 2d Session 
Public Law 102-104, 102nd 
Congress, 1st Session 
FRANKFORT, SOUTH FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY 
Nov 28, 1990 Flood protection in accordance with Plan R-1 of the Louisville District Public Law 101-640, 101th 
Commander's Re-evaluation Report, dated June 1990 and a executed LCA Congress, 2nd Session 
no later than October 1991 was authorized in Section 102 of the Water 
Resource Development Act of 1990. 
1Deficiency act. 
2Authorization for Nolin River and Bear Creek revoked 
by Act of Sep. 3, 1954 
3Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 
16-21 
Nov 5, 1990 
Aug 17, 1991

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 16-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(See Section 6) 
For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Name of Project Status Report Construction Maintenance 
Licking River 
Rough River, KY 
Tradewater River, KY 
White River, IN 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
1901 
1951 
1858 
1909 
$ 13,045 
105,500 
18,568 
119,312 
$ 126,002 
101,196 
33,331 
16-22

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project and Status 1 Report Construction Maintenance 
Local Protection: 
Completed: 
Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) 
Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) 
Brookport, IL 
Cannelton, IN 
Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY 2 
Chaplin River, Perryville, KY 2 
Cincinnati, OH 
Covington, KY 
Dayton, KY 
Delphi, IN (Wabash River) 
England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) 
English, IN (Little Blue River) 2 
Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort) (Kentucky River) 3 8 
Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) 
Golconda, IL 
Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN (Muscatatuck River) 2 
Harrisburg, IL 
Hawesville, KY 
Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section) (White River) 
Indian Creek, Corydon, IN 2 
Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) 
Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN 
Lawrenceburg, IN 
Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River) 2 
Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN 
Levee Unit No. 8, White River, IN 
Louisville, KY 4 
Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) 
Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River) 5 
Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY 2 
Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) 
Muncie, IN (White River) 
Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) 
New Albany, IN 
New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 27 
Newburgh, IN (Ohio River) 6 
Newport, KY 
Paducah, KY 
Panther Creek, KY (Green River) 2 
Portland, IN (Salamonie River) 2 
Reevesville, IL (Cache River) 
Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) 
Rosiclaire, IL 
Saline River & Tributaries, IL 
Shawneetown, IL7 
Sturgis, KY 
Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) 
Tell City, IN 
Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River) 7 
Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY 2 
Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River) 2 
Uniontown, KY 
Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) 7 
West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) 
1977 
1954 
1958 
1959 
1957 
1965 
1987 
1953 
1972 
1965 
1979 
1948 
1960 
1953 
1959 
1955 
1953 
1964 
1957 
1959 
1953 
1967 
1987 
1952 
1975 
1944 
1987 
1973 
1972 
1956 
1963 
1957 
1959 
1974 
1959 
1959 
1970 
1962 
1954 
1972 
1954 
1981 
1972 
1952 
1956 
1965 
1967 
1972 
1956 
1964 
1977 
$ 392,443 
1,240,299 
597,493 
2,068,391 
1,206,852 
832,700 
10,150,935 
7,862,937 
13,177,345 
144,563 
734,498 
372,353 
2,960,970 
561,200 
565,333 
70,304 
870,015 
969,318 
1,788,840 
300,143 
130,952 
4,226,361 
2,473,414 
130,417 
7,517,464 
700,534 
26,721,438 
267,391 
4,337,617 
292,710 
1,980,675 
887,835 
86,532 
5,375,471 
297,624 
52,061 
7,512,987 
4,761,551 
254,031 
237,657 
600,300 
1,079,236 
622,544 
7,826,219 
91,000 
1,826,778 
378,050 
932,229 
14,913 
56,505 
893,094 
1,070,926 
3,308,941 
1,095,704 
16-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
CONTINUED 
For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project and Status 1 Report Construction Maintenance 
Local Protection: 
Active: 
Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort) (Kentucky River) 8 9 
Hazard, KY9 
Holes Creek, West Carrollton, Ohio (Great Miami River)9 
Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section) (White River) 
Louisville, KY9 
Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, OH 9 
(Great Miami River) 
West Fork Mill Creek, OH (Winton Road) 9 
Inactive: 
Blue River, Salem, IN 
Cache River, Upper Basin, Ill 
Columbus, IN 
Greenfield Bayou, IN (Wabash River) 
Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) 
Kentucky River National Recreation Area 
Licking River, KY 
Mount Vernon, IN 
Southwest Ohio Urban Waterfront Development 
Vincennes, IL (Wabash River) 
Wabash River, York Township, Clark County, IL 
West Fork Drakes Creek, TN & KY 
West Point, KY 
Whitewater River & Tributaries, IN & OH 
Deferred: 
Grayville, IL 
Reservoirs: 
Active: 
Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) 
Inactive: 
Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) 
Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) 
Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 
Eagle Creek Lake, KY 
Falmouth Lake, KY (Licking River) 
Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) 
Louisville Lake, IL (Wabash River) 
Mining City Lake, KY (Green River) 
Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 
1979 
1976 
1964 
1983 
1977 
1980 
1976 
1975 
1981 
1977 
1983 
1976 
$ 1,068,606 
491,768 
493,846 
153,410 
415,000 
514,964 
477,649 
15,000 
44,000 
283,000 
157,935 
355,963 
30,000 
58,000 
4,490 
112,000 
235,615 
1,270,590 
1,009,188 
1,038,595 
702,471 
944,386 
1,200,920 
2,355,395 
350,474 
1,794,308- 
1All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 
2 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 1984 Flood Control Act, as amended. 
s Cost includes $161,098 cash contribution consisting IN. 
of $105,118 from the City of Frankfort, KY and $55,980 7 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining 
from the Commonwealth of Kentucky. portions of project inactive. 
SCost includes $1,716,301 cash contributions from the 8 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining 
City of Louisville, KY. portions of project are active and inactive. 
6 Cost shown are for levee and pump plants. 9 Advance Engineering and Design funded with General 
6 The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Investigations Appropriation. 
modified the Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include 
the bank protection works at Newburgh Locks & Dam 
project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh,
16-24

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
TABLE 16-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Date Funds Funds 
Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Flood Control - Local Protection: 
Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) - 1978 $ - - 
Alton, IN - 1977 - - 
Anderson, IN (White River) 1940 1986 5,724 - 
Aurora, IN - 1977 35,420 - 
Bellevue, KY - 1977 19,023 - 
Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) - 1981 - - 
Bromley, KY - 1977 - - 
California (Cincinnati), OH - 1977 16,465 - 
Carrollton, KY - 1977 9,713 - 
Caseyville, KY - 1986 - - 
Cave-in-Rock, IL - 1977 - - 
Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) - 1977 - - 
Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) - 1977 - - 
Cleves, OH - 1977 6,343 - 
Clinton, IN - 1977 6,848 - 
Cloverport, KY - 1986 - - 
Concordia, KY - 1986 - - 
Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN - 1977 - - 
Derby, IN - 1977 - - 
Elizabethtown, IL - 1977 - - 
Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN - 1977 3,361 - 
Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek) (Kentucky River) 1979 1992 - - 
Grandview, IN - 1977 8,497 - 
Honey Creek Levee, IN - 1977 - - 
Leavenworth, IN - 1977 - - 
Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - 
Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - 
Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN - 1977 - - 
Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN 1938 1977 275 - 
Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) 1973 1986 60,000 - 
Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - 
Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - 
Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - 
Levee Units 3 and 4, Wabash River, IL 1938 1977 216 - 
Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL - 1977 9,922 - 
Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN - 1977 - - 
Levee Unit 1, White River, IN - 1977 - - 
Levee Unit 7, White River, IN - 1977 - - 
Levee Unit 9, White River, IN - 1977 - - 
Levee Unit 10, White River, IN - 1977 - - 
Lewisport, KY - 1990 - - 
Louisville, KY (Partial) - 1986 
Ludlow, KY - 1977 14,503 
Madison, IN - 1977 - - 
Mauckport, IN - 1977 - - 
Marion, IN (Wabash River) 1979 1986 209,975 - 
McGinnis Levee, IN 1950 1977 71,049 - 
Metropolis, IL - 1986 10,575 - 
Milton, KY 1977 - - 
Moscow, OH - 1977 - - 
New Amsterdam, IN - 1977 - - 
New Harmony, IN - 1977 - - 
16-25

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 16-G 
CONTINUED 
DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Date Funds Funds 
Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Flood Control - Local Protection (Cont'd.) 
New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 
New Richmond, OH 
Newport-Wilder, KY 
Orleans, IN 
Owensboro, KY 
Patriot, IN 
Prestonville, KY 
Raccoon Creek Levee, IN 
Rising Sun, IN 
Rockport, IN 
Rome, IN 
Russell and Allison, IL 
Shawneetown, IL 
Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) 
Shuffiebarger Levee, IN 
Smithland, KY 
Sugar Creek Levee, IN 
Terre Haute, IN 
Tolu, KY 
Tri Pond Levee, IL 
Troy, IN 
Utica, IN 
Vevay, IN 
Vincennes, IN (Partial) 
Westport, KY 
Wilders, KY 
Flood Control - Reservoirs 
Big Blue Lake, IN 
Clifty Creek Lake, IN 
Downeyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) 
Helm Lake, IL 
Lincoln Lake, IL 
Metomora Lake, IN 
$ 
7,104 
13,158 
52,088 
25,367 
64,487 
28,061 
65,510 
1959 
1972 
1938 
1950 
1961 
1972 
1964 
1980 
1979 
1976 
1979 
1992 
1977 
1990 
1977 
1990 
1977 
1977 
1977 
1977 
1977 
1977 
1992 
1986 
1977 
1977 
1990 
1977 
1977 
1986 
1977 
1977 
1978 
1977 
1986 
1977 
1990 
1981 
1981 
1977 
1981 
1981 
1977 
1,079,867 
1,016,358 
41,616 
1,331,844 
16-26

TABLE 16-H NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS 
PRINCIPAL FEATURES - GREEN & BARREN RIVERS 
AND KENTUCKY RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEMS 
Lock Dimensions 
Miles Greatest Length 
Lock above Available Upper Depth of Year 
and Mouth of Distance from Width of For Full Normal Pool Miter Sills Character of Percent Opened to Cost 
Dam River Nearest Town Chamber Width Lift Elevation Upper Lower Foundation Complete Navigation Lock 
(feet) (feet) (feet msl) (feet) (feet) 
CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER- For report on this improvement see this heading under Ohio River. 
GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) 
GreenRiver 
New 1 9.1 Spottaville, KY 84.0 600.0 11.8 349.1 12.1 11.3 Shale and Coal 100 1956 2 $5,101,9 
New 2 63.1 0.3 miles below Calhoun, KY 84.0 600.0 14.3 363.4 15.0 11.7 Shale 100 1956 4,799,2 
3 108.5 0.3 miles below Rochester, KY 35.8 137.5 17.0 380.4 7.3 5.6 Rock 100 1836 6 121, 
4 149.0 Woodbury, KY 35.8 138.0 16.4 396.8 7.1 6.5 Rock 100 1839 125, 
5 168.1 0.3 miles below Glenmore, KY 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 8 12.0 9.3 Piles and Rock 100 1934 1,020, 
6 181.7 2.8 miles above Brownsville, KY 36.0 145.0 9.2 421.1 8.0 8.8 Gravel 100 1905 168, 
Barren River 
1 15.0 11 0.3 miles above Greencastle, KY 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 12.0 9.3 Gravel 100 1841 u 871,5 
KENTUCKY RIVER, KY (See Section 4 of Text) 
Kentucky River 
1 4.0 3.8 miles above Carrolton, KY 38.0 145.0 8.2 14 430.0 8.2 4.8 Rock and Clay 100 1839 15 - 
2 31.0 Lockport, KY 38.0 145.0 13.9 443.9 7.6 6.1 Rock 100 1839 1s 
3 42.0 Gest, KY 38.0 145.0 13.2 457.1 8.6 6.5 Rock 100 1844 1 1,350,3 
4 65.0 1.0 mile below Frankfort, KY 38.0 145.0 13.2 470.3 6.4 6.3 Rock 100 1844 * . 
5 82.2 2.8 miles below Tyrone, KY 38.0 145.0 15.0 485.3 10.0 6.4 Rock 100 1844 1s 1 
6 96.2 21.6 miles below High Bridge, KY 52.0 147.0 14.0 499.3 9.4 6.4 Rock and Piles 100 1894 1 314,8 
7 117.0 0.8 mile below High Bridge, KY 52.0 147.0 15.3 514.6 9.1 6.8 Rock 100 1897 17 290,7 
8 139.9 4.7 miles above Camp Nelson, KY 52.0 146.0 18.7 533.6 10.6 6.0 Rock 100 1900 n 275,4 
9 157.5 Valley View, KY 52.0 148.0 17.3 550.6 10.0 6.6 Rock 100 1907 7 237,6 
10 176.4 1.0 mile below Ford, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 567.6 9.0 6.0 Rock 100 1907 n 221,5 
11 201.0 17.2 miles below Irvine, KY 52.0 148.0 18.0 585.6 10.0 6.0 Rock 100 1906 7 296,5 
12 220.0 Ravenna, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 602.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1910 1 425,6 
13 239.9 2.2 miles below Willow, KY 52.0 148.0 18.0 620.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1915 7 461,4 
14 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 637.6 8.6 6.0 Rock 100 1971 7 392,9 
'At normal pool Dam 48, Ohio River, Elev. 337.3, Green River datum (Elev. 338.0 Ohio River datum) 
2New Lock 1 placed in operation May 25, 1956, old Dam 1, completed 1835-40, replaced with new cellular concrete masonry dam constructed 1970-71 with O&M funds at cost of $ 
3Does not include $179,110 cost of old Lock and Dam 1. 
4New Lock and Dam 2, placed in operation June 18, 1956. 
5 Does not include $295,696 cost of old Lock and Dam 2. 
6Operation discontinued September 30, 1981. 
SBreaching of dam on May 24, 1965, stopped through traffic to Bowling Green, KY. 
8 With moveable A-frame crest 3 feet high. 
9Operation discontinued August 1, 1951. 
to Does not include $179,434 cost of old Lock and Dam 5. 
11 Distance from mouth of Green River is 164.5 miles. Lock closed to navigation as the result of loss of pool at Green River Lock and Dam 4 on May 24, 1965. 
12 Piles in old gravel dam completed in 1934. 
tof 
and Dam 
378 s 
271 s 
377 
718 
368 to 
415 
565 1 
85 1o 
47 
88 
63 
46 
00 
93 
93 
76 
02 
X822,000.
IU

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 16-I OHIO RIVER BASIN 
TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN 
(See Section 27 of Text) 
LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost 
Type of 
Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total 
Completed: 
Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River)3 4 Channel improvement 
Boone County, KY Bank Protection 
Brookport, IL 5 6 Wall and levee 
Cannelton, IN 5 ' Wall and levee 
Cincinnati, OH 5 s Wall and barrier dam 
Covington, KY 6 9 Wall and levee 
Dayton, KY Wall and levee 
Delphi, IN (Wabash River) 5 10 Levee 
England Pond Levee, IL 
(Wabash River) 11 Levee 
Frankfort, KY,North Frankfort 
(Kentucky River) s Wall and levee 
Golconda, IL 5 12 Wall and levee 
Harrisburg, IL s 10 Wall and levee 
Hawesville, KY s 13 Levee 
Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) s 8 Cutoff channel 
Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN ' Wall and levee 
Lawrenceburg, IN 6 Wall and levee 
Louisville, KY s 14 Wall and levee 
Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN 
(Wabash River) 4s Levee and pump plants 
New Albany, IN s 8 Wall and levee 
New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN 
(Wabash River) s ' Bank Protection 
Newport, KY s ' Wall and levee 
Paducah, KY s ' Wall and levee 
Perryville, KY, Chapin River Channel Improvement 
Reevesville, IL (Cache River) s 1s Levee 
Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL 
(Wabash River) 11 Levee 
Rough River, KY 3 4 Channel improvement 
Southwest Jefferson County Wall and Levee 
Sturgis, KY (Tradewater River) 11 Levee 
Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) s 16 Levee 
Tell City, IN 5 14 Wall and levee 
Uniontown, KY Levee 
Vincennes, IN s 17 
(Wabash River)(completed portion) s Wall and levee 
West Terre Haute, IN 
(Wabash River) Levee 
Active: 
Evansville, IN 4 
Frankfort, KY 
(Kentucky River) South Frankfort b 
Hazard, KY 
Salyersville, KY 
Wall and levee 
Wall 
Channel Improvement 
Channel Improvement 
$ 144,000 
392,443 
597,493 
2,068,391 
10,150,935 
7,862,937 
13,117,345 
144,563 
734,498 
2,960,970 
565,333 
870,015 
969,318 
130,952 
4,226,361 
2,473,689 
25,005,137 
4,337,617 
5,375,471 
297,624 
7,512,987 
4,761,551 
823,700 
600,300 
1,079,236 
654,000 
60,077,183 
1,826,778 
378,050 
932,229 
1,070,926 
3,308,941 
1,095,704 
44,654,000 
8,630,000 
9,348,600 
$ 18,000 
83,000 
8,500 
29,105 
1,309,146 
1,051,102 
2,013,000 
17,164 
107,000 
272,100 
10,900 
20,000 
42,593 
3,000 
590,888 
284,725 
1,716,301 
$ 162,000 
475,443 
605,993 
2,097,496 
11,460,081 
8,914,039 
15,130,345 
161,727 
841,498 
3,233,070 
576,233 
890,015 
1,011,911 
133,952 
4,817,249 
2,758,414 
26,721,438 
109,200 4,446,817 
740,000 6,115,471 
298,506 
232,000 
11,000 
40,000 
100,000 
5,000 
9,917,000 
93,000 
63,309 
32,707 
72,153 
285,000 
150,000 
297,624 
7,811,493 
4,993,551 
834,700 
640,300 
1,179,236 
659,000 
69,994,183 
1,919,778 
441,359 
964,936 
1,143,079 
3,593,941 
1,245,704 
5,500,000 50,154,000 36 
2,880,000 
981,400 
11,510,000 36 
10,330,000 
Inactive: 
None 
16-28

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
TABLE 16-I 
CONTINUED 
OHIO RIVER BASIN 
TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN 
(See Section 27 of Text) 
LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost 
Type of 
Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total 
Deauthorized: 
Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) 32 
Alton, IN so30 
Aurora, IN 31 
Bellevue, KY so30 
Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) s 33 
Bromley, KY 30 
California (Cincinnati), OH 31 
Carrollton, KY so30 
Caseyville, KY 5 34 
Cave-in-Rock, IL 30 
Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) 30 
Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) 30 
Cleves, OH 30 
Clinton, IN (Wabash River) 30 
Cloverport, KY 5 34 
Concordia, KY 5 34 
Deer Creek Prairie Levee, IN 
(Wabash River) 30 
Derby, IN 30 
Elizabethtown, IL 30 
Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, 
IN (Wabash River) 30 
Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) 
Benson Creek 6 
Grandview, IN 30 
Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN 
(Wabash River) 6 s5 
Honey Creek Levee, IN 30 
Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) 5 s5 
Leavenworth, IN 30 
Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN 30 
Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River,IL 30 
Levee Unit 1, White River, IN so30 
Levee Unit 17, IN 30 
Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN so30 
Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL so30 
Levee Unit 2, White River, IN so30 
Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL 30 
Levee Unit 7, White River, IN s
30 
Lewisport, KY 5 35 
Ludlow, KY so30 
Madison, IN so30 
Mauckport, IN so30 
McGinnis Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 
Metropolis, IL s3 
Milton, KY so3 
Moscow, OH so30 
New Amsterdam, IN 30 
New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN 
(Wabash River) 6' 
New Harmony, IN (Wabash River) so 
Levee 
Levee 
Wall and levee 
Wall and levee 
Channel Improvement 
Wall and levee 
Wall and levee 
Wall and levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Wall and levee 
Wall 
Levee 
Levee 
Wall and levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Wall and levee 
Wall and levee 
Levee 
Wall and Levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Wall and levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Wall and levee 
Wall and levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Wall and levee 
Wall 
Levee 
Levee 
Bank Protection 
Levee 
$ 292,000 
255,000 
4,300,000 
1,570,000 
1,080,000 
1,250,000 
1,750,000 
2,220,000 
396,000 
661,000 
16,800,000 
14,900,000 
1,240,000 
77,000 
728,000 
590,000 
213,000 
553,000 
559,000 
548,000 
3,340,000 
580,000 
4,600,000 
653,000 
4,630,000 
1,470,000 
204,000 
2,850,000 
2,180,000 
1,580,000 
2,090,000 
3,410,000 
724,000 
1,160,000 
1,490,000 
610,000 
2,540,000 
3,820,000 
506,000 
1,820,000 
3,070,000 
2,480,000 
1,170,000 
476,000 
664,376 
616,000 
$ 14,000 
40,000 
1,190,000 
400,000 
630,000 
925,000 
720,000 
97,000 
35,000 
125,000 
2,900,000 
621,000 
67,000 
9,000 
193,000 
55,000 
10,000 
67,000 
153,000 
26,000 
1,150,000 
133,000 
1,087,000 
32,000 
528,000 
266,000 
40,000 
164,000 
116,000 
118,000 
715,000 
136,000 
73,000 
56,000 
88,000 
243,000 
745,000 
360,000 
105,000 
104,000 
431,000 
41,000 
372,000 
13,000 
99,000 
25,000 
$ 306,000 27 
295,000 
5,490,000 
1,970,000 
1,710,000 28 
2,175,000 
2,470,000 
2,317,000 
431,000 
786,000 
19,700,000 
15,521,000 
1,307,000 
86,000 
921,000 
645,000 
223,000 24 
620,000 
712,000 
574,000 24 
4,490,000 22 
713,000 
5,687,000 23 
685,000 
5,158,000 23 
1,736,000 
244,000 
3,014,000 27 
2,296,000 27 
1,698,000 28 
2,805,000 
3,546,000 28 
797,000 27 
1,216,000 
1,578,000 27 
853,000 24 
3,285,000 
4,180,000 
611,000 
1,924,000 
3,501,000 
2,521,000 
1,542,000 
489,000 
763,376 25 
641,000 
16-29

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 16-I 
CONTINUED 
OHIO RIVER BASIN 
TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN 
(See Section 27 of Text) 
LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost 
Type of 
Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total 
New Richmond, OH 30 
Owensboro, KY 5 35 
Patriot, IN 30 
Prestonville, KY 30 
Raccoon Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 
Rising Sun, IN 30 
Rockport, IN 30 
Rome, IN 30 
Russell and Allison Levee, IN 
(Wabash River) 937 
Shawneetown, IL 5 34 
Shufflebarger Levee, IN 
(Wabash River) 30 
Smithland, KY 5 35 
Sugar Creek Levee, IN 
(Wabash River) 30 
Tolu, KY 5 34 
Tri-Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) 30 
Troy, IN 30 
Utica, IN 5 32 
Vevay, IN 30 
Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) 
(Uncompleted Portion) 6 34 
West Point, KY 5 34 
Westport, KY 30 
Wilder, KY 35 
Wall and levee 
Wall and levee 
Levee 
Wall and levee 
Levee 
Wall and levee 
Wall and levee 
Levee 
Wall and levee 
Levee 
Wall and levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Wall and levee 
Levee 
Levee 
Wall and levee 
Wall and levee 
Wall 
Wall and levee 
$ 3,200,000 
886,000 
753,000 
1,710,000 
426,000 
896,000 
466,000 
359,000 
1,810,000 
2,380,000 
864,000 
418,000 
303,000 
2,050,000 
502,000 
1,570,000 
1,170,000 
3,340,000 
3,283,000 
1,610,000 
10,800,000 
$ 720,000 
195,000 
372,000 
55,000 
37,000 
280,000 
133,000 
67,000 
361,000 
$ 3,920,000 
1,081,000 
1,125,000 
1,765,000 
463,000 24 
1,176,000 
599,000 
426,000 
2,171,000 
90,000 2,470,000 
414,000 1,278,000 
29,000 
35,000 
191,000 
133,000 
120,000 
146,000 
447,000 24 
338,000 
2,241,000 25 
635,000 
1,690,000 
1,316,000 
3,340,000 28 
400,000 3,683,000 24 
41,000 1,651,00 
959,000 11,759,000 26 
1All projects are on an Ohio River unless otherwise 
noted. 
2 Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise 
noted. 
3 Part of Rough River Reservoir and Channel 
Improvement Project, KY. 
4 Details of this project are in individual report. 
s Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 
6 See Annual Report for 1958 for details. 
7 See Annual Report for 1959 for details. 
8 See Annual Report for 1957 for details. 
9 See Annual Report for 1965 for details. 
10 See Annual Report for 1953 for details. 
11 See Annual Report for 1972 for details. 
12 See Annual Report for 1960 for details. 
13 See Annual Report for 1955 for details. 
14 See Annual Report for 1962 for details. 
15 Substitute project for Belknap, Karnak, and Ullin, 
IL, complete. See Annual Report for 1954 for details. 
16 See Annual Report for 1952 for details. 
17 See Annual Report for 1956 for details. 
18 Latest cost estimate revision 1988. 
19 Latest cost estimate revision 1986. 
20 Latest cost estimate revision 1984. 
21 Latest cost estimate revision 1983. 
22 Latest cost estimate revision 1976. 
23 Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 
24 Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 
25 Latest cost estimate revision 1971. 
26 Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 
27 Latest cost estimate revision 1961. 
28 Latest cost estimate revision 1973. 
29 Latest cost estimate revision 1989. 
30 Deauthorized Aug 05, 1977 under Section 12, Water 
Resources Development Act of 1971 (P.L. 93-251). 
31 Deauthorized Nov 06, 1977 under Section 12, Water 
Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 
32 Deauthorized Oct 03, 1978 under Section 12, Water 
Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 
33 Deauthorized May 06, 1981 under Section 12, Water 
Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 
34 Deauthorized Nov 17, 1986 under Section 12, Water 
Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 
35 Deauthorized Jan 01, 1990 under Section 1001 
(b)(1), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 
99-662). 
36 Latest cost estimate revision 1992. 
37 Deauthorized Jul 19, 1992. 
16-30

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
TABLE 16-I 
CONTINUED 
OHIO RIVER BASIN 
TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN 
(See Section 27 of Text) 
RESERVOIRS 
Estimated Cost 
Tributary Basin 
Reservoirs Status Stream Federal Non-Federal Total 
Great Miami River: 
Brookville Lake, IN 2 
Metamora Lake, IN 
Green River: 
Barren River Lake, KY 2 
Green River Lake, KY 2 
Mining City Lake, KY 
Nolin Lake, KY 2 
Rough River Kentucky 2 
Kentucky River: 
Booneville Lake, KY 
Buckhorn Lake, KY 2 
Carr Fork Lake, KY 2 
Eagle Creek Lake, KY 
Red River Lake, KY 
Licking River: 
Cave Run Lake, KY 2 
Falmouth Lake, KY 
Little Miami River: 
Caesar Creek Lake, OH 2 
William H. Harsha 
Lake, OH 2 
Mill Creek: 
West Fork of 
Mill Creek Lake, OH 2 
Wabash River: 
Cagles Mill Lake, IN 2 
Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN 2 
Monroe Lake, IN 2 
Patoka Lake, IN 2 
Complete 
Deauthorized 
Complete 
Complete 
Inactive 
Complete 
Complete 
Inactive 
Complete 
Complete 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Complete 
Inactive 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
Complete 
East Fork of Whitewater 
River 
West Fork of Whitewater 
River 
Barren River 
Green River 
Green River 
Nolin River 
Rough River 
South Fork of Kentucky 
River 
Middle Fork of Kentucky 
River 
North Fork of Kentucky 
River 
Eagle Creek 
Red River 
Licking River 
Licking River 
Caesar Creek 
East Fork of Little Miami 
River 
$ 37,905,073 
35,300,000 
27,371,299 
33,238,597 
69,100,000 
17,193,278 
10,620,389 
60,700,000 
11,766,206 
50,854,826 
27,800,000 
38,551,692 
81,162,282 
125,000,000 
$ 7,497,492 3 $ 45,402,565 
35,300,000 4 
108,418 6 27,479,717 
223,733 13 33,462,330 
69,100,000 4 
17,193,278 
22,612 10,643,001 
60,700,000 8 
11,766,206 
50,854,826 
- 27,800,000 14 
1,794,308 40,346,000 
81,162,282 7 
125,000,000 8 
62,893,882 5,037,000 67,930,882 
52,023,157 3,485,840 9 55,508,997 
West Fork of Mill Creek 3,622,302 
Mill Creek 
Raccoon Creek 
Salt Creek 
Patoka River 
4,256,903 
6,633,812 
7,902,827 
53,095,790 
1,100,161 10 4,722,463 
113,094 
353,995 
8,667,947 
20,568,369 
4,369,997 
6,987,807 
16,570,774 
73,664,159 
1Latest cost estimate revision 1989 unless otherwise 
noted. 
2Details of this project given in individual report. 
3Cash contributions for water supply storage. 
4Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 
5For Code 713 recreaton development. 
6Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 
'Includes $6,900,000 United States Forest Service cost. 
8Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 
9Reimbursement for water supply storage. 
10 Includes $520,800 for non-Federal cost for sewer 
relocation and dam, $50,000 for contributed funds in 
fulfillment of project authorization, and $529,361 for Code 
713 recreation development. 
11 Includes $7,797,604 cash contribution for storage 
for low-flow regulation and $870,343 non-Federal 
contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 
12 Includes $14,180,677 cash contribution for water 
supply storage, and $6,387,692 for initial recreation 
development. 
13 For $183,732 Code 713 recreation development and 
$40,001 contributed funds. 
14 Latest cost estimate 1974 
16-31

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 16-J WABASH RIVER BASIN 
TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN 
(FLOOD CONTROL) 
(See Section 32 of Text) 
Type of Estimated Cost 
Construction 
Project. or Stream Status Federal Non-Federal Total 
LOCAL PROTECTION 
Marion, IN Wall and Levee Inactive $ 3,900,000 $ 854,000 $ 4,754,000 2 
RESERVOIRS 
Big Blue Lake, IN Big Blue River Deauthorized 87,200,000 53,836,000 3 141,036,000 4 
Big Walnut Lake, IN Big Walnut Creek Inactive 81,800,000 45,069,000 s 126,869,000 ' 
Downeyville Lake, IN Flatrock and Little 
Flatrock Rivers Inactive 74,200,000 64,448,000 6 138,648,000 ' 
Helm Lake, IN Skillet Fork Deauthorized 25,171,000 14,829,000 ' 40,000,000 8 
Louisville Lake, IL Little Wabash River Inactive 113,000,000 14,435,000 9 127,435,000 10 
1Latest cost revision 1984 unless otherwise noted. interests for water supply, $8,749,000 reimbursable for 
2Latest cost estimate revision 1977. initial recreation facilities. 
3Includes $38,190,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 'Includes $12,696,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 
interests for water supply and $15,656,000 reimbursable interests for water supply and $2,133,000 reimbursable for 
for initial recreation facilities, initial recreation facilities. 
4Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 8Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 
5Includes $26,663,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 9lncludes $8,402,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 
interests for water supply and $18,406,000 reimbursable interests for water supply and $6,033,000 reimbursable for 
for initial recreation facilities, initial recreation facilities. 
6Includes $53,084,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 10 Latest cost estimate revision 1982. 
TABLE 16-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 35 of Text) 
Date of 
Projects Inspection 
Local Protection Projects 
Brevoort Levee, IN 
Brookport, IL 
Cache River Levee, IL 
Cannelton, IN 
Cincinnati, OH 
Covington, KY 
Dayton, KY 
Delphi, IN 
England Pond Levee, IL 
Evansville, IN 
Frankfort, KY, North Frankfort 
Gill Township Levee, IN 
Golconda, IL 
Harrisburg, IL 
Hagerstown, IN 
Hawesville, KY 
Indianapolis, IN 
Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN 
Lawrenceburg, IN 
Lebanon Junction, KY 
Jul 1995 
Jul 1995 
Jul 1995 
Feb 1995 
Aug 1995 
Aug 1995 
Apr 1995 
Apr 1995 
Jul 1995 
Jan 1995 
Sep 1995 
Jun 1995 
Feb 1995 
Feb 1995 
Mar 1995 
Feb 1995 
Mar 1995 
Sep 1995 
Apr 1995 
Mar 1995 
16-32

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
TABLE 16-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 35 of Text) 
Date of 
Projects Inspection 
Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Feb 1995 
Levee Unit No. 8, Wabash River, IN Jun 1995 
Louisville, KY Aug 1995 
Lyford Levee, IN Apr 1995 
Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN Jul 1995 
Mount Carmel, IL Feb 1995 
Muncie, IN Mar 1995 
New Albany, IN Sep 1995 
Newport, KY Apr 1995 
Paducah, KY Jul 1995 
Perryville, KY Sep 1995 
Reevesville, IL Jul 1995 
Rochester-McClearys Bluff Levee, IL Jul 1995 
Rosiclare, IL Feb 1995 
Shawneetown, IL Feb 1995 
Southwestern Jefferson County, KY Aug 1995 
Sturgis, KY May 1995 
Taylorsville, KY Apr 1995 
Tell City, IN Jan 1995 
Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN Jun 1995 
Uniontown, KY May 1995 
Vincennes, IN Jul 1995 
West Terre Haute, IN Apr 1995 
Channel Improvements 
Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY May 1995 
Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY Sep 1995 
Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN Apr 1995 
English, IN (Little Blue River) Jun 1994 
Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN Sep 1995 
Harrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) Sep 1995 
Indian Creek, Corydon, IN Jun 1994 
Jackson, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Sep 1995 
Lick Creek, Hartford City (Blackford County), IN Mar 1995 
Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1988 
Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN Jul 1990 
Neon-Fleming, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Sep 1995 
Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY Sep 1995 
Panther Creek, Curdsville, KY Oct 1995 
Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY Mar 1993 
Portland, IN (Salamonie River) Mar 1995 
Rough River, Hartford, Ohio County, KY Sep 1995 
Salamonie River, Wells County, IN Mar 1995 
Saline River and Tributaries, IL Feb 1995 
Tripplett Creek, Morehead, KY Sep 1995 
Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY Sep 1995 
Wabash River, Adams County, IN Mar 1995 
Whitesburg, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Sep 1995 
Bank Revetments 
Crooked Creek, City Garage, Madison, IN Aug 1995 
Crooked Creek, John Paul Park, Madison, IN Aug 1995 
East Fork White River, Brownstown, (Jackson County), IN Jun 1993 
Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham County, KY Jun 1993 
16-33

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 16-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 35 of Text) 
Date of 
Projects Inspection 
Great Miami River, Ice Jam Flooding, Port Jefferson, OH Aug 1995 
Great Miami River, Sidney, OH Aug 1995 
Green River, Calhoun, KY (River Mile 63.6) Sep 1995 
Green River, Calhoun, KY (River Mile 63.4) Sep 1995 
Indian Creek, Burton Lane, Morgan County, IN Apr 1995 
Licking River, Butler, KY Aug 1995 
Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL Feb 1995 
Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH Apr 1995 
Little Miami River, Milford, OH Apr 1995 
Nameless Creek, Warren County, IN Jun 1995 
Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY Jun 1993 
Ohio River, Cloverport, KY Oct 1995 
Ohio River, Daviess County, KY Oct 1995 
Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL Jul 1995 
Ohio River, Hawesville, KY Oct 1995 
Ohio River, Lewisport, KY Aug 1995 
Ohio River, Madison, IN Aug 1995 
Ohio River, Moscow, OH Aug 1995 
Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN May 1995 
Ohio River, Newburgh, IN Jul 1994 
Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN Jul 1994 
Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY Jun 1993 
Ohio River, Owensboro, KY Oct 1995 
Ohio River, Owensboro Riverport Authority, KY Feb 1995 
Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone County, KY Apr 1995 
Ohio River, RockportlRockport Landing, IN May 1995 
Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN Sep 1986 
Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN Dec 1993 
Ohio River, Troy, IN May 1995 
Ohio River, Upper River Road, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1991 
Ohio River, Vanderburg County, IN Jul 1994 
Patoka River, Jasper, IN Oct 1993 
Patoka River, Winslow, IN Jul 1995 
South Fork of Wildcat Creek, County Road 7 East, Tippecanoe County, IN Apr 1995 
Stoner Creek, North Middletown, KY Jul 1994 
Wabash River, near Merom, IN Jun 1995 
Wabash River, New Harmony, IN Feb 1995 
Wabash River, Terre Haute STP Outfall Jun 1995 
Wabash River, Vigo County, County Road 83 West Jun 1995 
Wabash River, Vigo County, Little Road Jun 1995 
White River, Morgan County, Blue Bluff Road, IN Apr 1995 
White River, Petersburg (Pike County), IN Jul 1995 
Whitewater River, Levee Road, near Brookville, IN Apr 1995 
Wastewater Treatment Plant, Great Miami River, Ross, OH Apr 1995 
16-34

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
TABLE 16-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK 
UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
(See Section 37 of Text) 
Fiscal Year Cost 
Federal Non-Fed Total 
Small Navigation (Section 107) 
Southwind Maritime Center, Mt. Vernon 2 15,000 0 15,000 
U Miss R System Environmental Management Program b 11 0 11 
Flood Control (Section 205) 
Bailey Creek, Indianapolis, IN 6 120 (120) 0 
Beech Fork, Bardstown, KY 2 27,407 - 27,407 
Buck Ditch, Ft. Recovery 6 45,479 9,726 55,205 
City Ditch, Brevoort Levee, IN s 4,526 - 4,526 
Crooked Creek, Madison, IN 2 43,256 - 43,256 
Deshee River, Brevoort Levee, IN s 26,048 - 26,048 
Duck Creek, Elwood, IN 2 14,069 1,704 15,773 
Feather Creek, Clinton, IN 3 99,253 - 99,253 
Flatrock River, Rushville, IN 2 71,504 28,822 100,326 
Great Miami River, Port Jeff, OH 5 -12,672 12,672 0 
Jack's Defeat Creek, IN 6 7,103 - 7,103 
Lancassange Creek, Clark Co., IN 4 384,883 33,219 418,102 
N. Fork, KY River, Jackson, KY 2 62,150 52,314 114,464 
Penitentiary Jones Run, KY 4 530,701 164,421 695,122 
Pigeon Roost Creek 2 13,043 - 13,043 
Pipe Creek, Alexandria, IN 2 2,306 - 2,306 
Pleasant Creek, Greenwood, IN 2 53,513 - 53,513 
Salt Creek, Nashville, IN 2 13,602 - 13,602 
Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH 3 5,153 - 5,153 
West Fork, Blue River, Salem, IN 6 5,000 - 5,000 
White River, Petersburg, IN 6 169 - 169 
Whitewater River, Hagerstown, IN 5 -5 5 0 
Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14) 
Crooked Creek, City Garage, Madison, IN 5 513 (513) 0 
Eagle Creek, Indianapolis, IN 1 21,154 - 21,154 
Embarrass River, St. Marie, IL 5 123,142 43,353 166,495 
Green River, Calhoun, KY s 42,389 20,568 42,389 
Little Blue River, Shelby County, IN 6 5,670 - 5,670 
Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY s (1,738) 1,738 0 
Ohio River, Carollton, KY 1 8,504 - 8,504 
Ohio River, City Park, West Point, KYs 122,718 45,259 167,977 
Ohio River, Daviess County, KY 6 30,644 15,043 45,687 
Ohio River, New Richmond, OH ' 4,512 - 4,512 
Wabash River, Russell & Allispn Levee, IL 23,973 - 23,973 
White Lick Creek, Bottom Rd., IN " 145,195 37,986 183,181 
White Lick Creek, Henderson 4 83,637 16,636 100,273 
White River, Blue Bluff Rd., Morgan, IN" 206,657 58,272 264,929 
Whitewater River, Brooksville 1 11,532 - 11,532 
Snagging & Clearing 
Salamonie River, Montpelier, IN s -49 49 0 
1 Planning and Design Analysis (PDA) 
2 Feasibility Report 
3 Plans and Specification 
4 Construction Funds Received or Construction Underway 
5 Construction Completed 
6 Study Terminated 
16-35

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 16-M GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
(See Sections 38, 39, 40, & 41 of Text) 
Fiscal Year 1995 Cost 
Projects Federal Non-Fed Total 
SURVEYS 
Navigation Studies 
Ohio River Greenway Corridor, IN $ 5,501 $ - $ 5,501 
Ohio River Mainstem, Uniontown, KY, IL, IN 1,813,037 - 1,813,037 
Flood Damage Prevention Studies 
Metropolitan Cincinnati, OH 69,878 - 69,878 
Metropolitan Louisville Beargrass Creek, KY 274,325 127,325 401,650 
Clinton, Ohio (27,618) - (27,618) 
Dayton, Miami River Basin, OH 30,818 - 30,818 
Green and Barren River, KY 7,730 - 7,730 
Indianapolis, IN 208,438 174,465 382,903 
Indianapolis, IN 2,617 - 2,617 
McLean County, KY 120,797 - 120,797 
Metropolitan Region, Cincinnati, Duck Creek, OH 624 (624) 0 
Metropolitan Louisville, Pond Creek, KY (6,377) (3,807) (10,184) 
Ohio River & Trib 307,401 - 307,401 
Ohio River Flood Protection 126,570 - 126,570 
Orange County, Lost River, IN 7 - 7 
Salt River Basin, KY 19,107 - 19,107 
Upper Tippecanoe River Basin 243,515 - 243,515 
Wabash River Basin Comprehensive, IN, IL 60,508 - 60,508 
Wabash River, Brevoort Levee 95,943 - 95,943 
Wabash River, New Harmony, IN 53,419 - 53,419 
Wabash Scenic Corridor, IN 74,576 19,765 94,341 
Special Studies 
Environmental Services Partnership 3,290 - 3,290 
Miscellaneous Activities 
Special Investigation, KY 75,520 - 75,520 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 13,371 - 13,371 
Intra-Agency Water Resources Development 36,599 - 36,599 
North American Waterfowl Management Plan 4,793 - 4,793 
PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
Navigation Project - Lock and Dams 
McAlpine Locks and Dam, IN & KY 1,616,180 - 1,616,180 
Metro Region, Duck Creek, OH 691,456 - 691,456 
Metro Louisville, Pond Creek, KY 577,501 - 577,501 
Ohio River Greenway, In 478,245 - 478,245 
Flood Control Projects - Local Protection 
Holes Creek, West Carrollton, OH 23,699 - 23,699 
Hazard, KY 27,255 - 27,255 
South Frankfort, KY 91 - 91 
White River, Central Waterfront 3,463,699 - 3,463,699 
Environmental Infra-Structure 
Hazard, KY 83,935 30,073 114,008 
16-36

LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 
TABLE 16-M GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
(See Sections 38, 39, 40, & 41 of Text) 
Fiscal Year 1995 Cost 
Projects Federal Non-Fed Total 
COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES 
Coordination with other Agencies and Non-Federal Interest 
Water Resources Agencies $ 12,444 $ - $ 12,444 
Planning Assistance to States 
Planning Assistance to States 3,006 0 3,006 
PAS Pigeon Creek Floodway 0 687 687 
Dam Safety Plan 13,148 2,769 15,917 
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 
Flood Plain Management Services 
Flood Plain Management - Louisville, KY 22,081 - 22,081 
Technical Service, General 69,191 - 69,191 
Quick Responses 5,780 - 5,780 
Special Studies - Patton Lake, Morgan Co, IN 20,076 - 20,076 
Special Studies - Tippecanoe River, Carrol Co 1,760 - 1,760 
Lake Laramie, OH 14,841 - 14,841 
Speical Studies - Hopkins County 18,733 - 18,733 
Hydrologic Studies 
Hydrologic Studies 10,097 - 10,097 
16-37

HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT *
All cost and financial statements for projects are 
listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are 
referenced in the text and also appear at the end of 
this chapter. 
The Huntington District includes central and southeastern 
Ohio, all of West Virginia except the northern 
panhandle and northeastern portion, the eastern portion 
of Kentucky, a portion of midwestern Virginia, a very 
small portion of northwestern North Carolina, embraced 
in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries 
from approximate river mile 127 (below Pittsburgh, PA) 
to approximate river mile 438, immediately upstream 
from Foster, KY. The drainage area of the Huntington 
District is approximately 44,914 square miles. 
Improvements 
Page 
Navigation 
1. Construction of Locks and Dams 
on O hio River ................................................... 17-2 
2. Kanawha River, WV ......................................... 17-2 
3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River ..................... 17-2 
4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects..............17-2 
Flood Control 
5. Alum Creek Lake, OH ...................................... 17-2 
6. Beech Fork Lake, WV ...................................... 17-3 
7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ........... 17-3 
8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ............ 17-3 
9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH .......... 17-3 
10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH.............17-4 
11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ................. 17-4 
12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ................... 17-4 
13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ........... 17-5 
14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ............... 17-5 
15. Grayson Lake, KY ............................................ 17-5 
16. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, 
Ohio River Basin, VA ....................................... 17-6 
17. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and 
Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA ............... 17-6 
18. M assillon, O H .................................................. 17-6 
19. Muskingum River Lakes, OH ........................... 17-7 
20. Newark, OH ..................................................... 17-7 
21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH ....... 17-8 
22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA................17-8 
23. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) ............. 17-8 
Page 
24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH .......... 17-8 
25. Paintsville Lake, KY ......................................... 17-9 
26. R.D. Bailey Lake, WV ...................................... 17-9 
27. Roseville, O H ................................................... 17-9 
28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ....... 17-9 
29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ................ 17-10 
30. Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH.........17-10 
31. West Columbus, OH ........................................ 17-10 
32. Yatesville Lake, KY .......................................... 17-10 
33. Inspection of Completed 
Flood Control Projects ...................................... 17-11 
34. Flood Control Work Under 
Special Authorization ....................................... 17-11 
General Investigations 
35. Surveys ........................................................... 17-11 
36. Collection and Study of Basic Data...................17-11 
Tables 
Table 17-A Cost & Financial Statement ............... 17-12 
Table 17-B Authorization Legislation .................... 17-17 
Table 17-C Other Authorized 
Navigation Projects ............................ 17-20 
Table 17-D Not Applicable 
Table 17-E Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects ................................. 17-21 
Table 17-F Not Applicable 
Table 17-G Deauthorized Projects.........................17-22 
Table 17-H Inspection of Flood Control Projects ... 17-24 
17-1

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
1. Construction of Locks and Dams on the Ohio River 
See this heading under Chapter 19- Ohio River. 
2. Kanawha River, WV 
Location. The Kanawha River is approximately 97 
miles in length and is formed by the junction of the New 
and Gauley Rivers, a short distance above Kanawha 
Falls, WV, and flows generally northwesterly to the 
confluence with the Ohio River at Point Pleasant, WV. 
Previous projects. For details of previous projects 
see the Annual Reports for 1875, 1915 and 1938. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of 
three navigation structures on the Kanawha River. 
London Locks and Dam are located approximately 83 
miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River and 
approximatelytwomilesdownstreamfromMontgomery, 
WV. Marmet Locks and Dam are located approximately 
68 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at 
Marmet, WV. Winfield Locks and Dam are located 
approximately 31 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha 
River at Winfield, WV. Each structure has twin locks 
with usable dimensions of 56 feet by 360 feet. Another 
structure, Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, is located on 
the Ohio River at approximate river mile 279 and 
approximately nine miles below Gallipolis, OH. This 
structure has two parallel locks, the main lock is 110 feet 
by 1,200 feet. This system of locks and dams provides a 
navigable depth of nine feet from the mouth of the 
Kanawha River to a point approximately 91 miles 
upstream. The existing project was completed at a cost 
of $27,853,699. Construction was initiated in 1931 and 
completed in 1937. For further cost details see Table 17- 
B, see also, Appendix C. Public Law 99-88 authorized the 
initiation of Engineering and Design and Real Estate 
Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam Replacement. 
Feasibility studies for modernization have been 
completed. The plan includes construction of an additional 
lock chamber (800'x110') adjacent to the existing locks 
and continued use of the riverward lock chamber and the 
navigation dam. The contract for Lock Replacement - 
Phase I was awarded in April 1990 and is complete. The 
contract for Construction of Additional Lock and Gate 
Bay, Phase IIA, was awarded in May 1993 and is complete. 
The contract for lock replacement, Phase IIB, was 
awarded in January 1994 and is 38% complete. The full 
funding estimate for new work is $372,000,000, which is 
50 percent Federal cost and 50 percent Inland Water 
Ways Trust Fund cost. Preconstruction engineering and 
design work is underway for Marmet Locks and Dam 
: :. 
., 
,4;{.,"' \{\i\' "C\{\ i{ i$\: : ".K},""t~}v,:i:}\ : 
5. Alum Creek Lake, OH 
Location. The damsite is located in Delaware County, 
OH, on Alum Creek, a tributary of Big Walnut Creek, 
approximately 26 miles above the mouth of Alum Creek 
and 15 miles north of Columbus, OH, and approximately 
157 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
rolled earthfill dam 93 feet in height and 10,000 feet in 
length with a gate controlled spillway located in the right 
abutment. The reservoir provides a total storage of 
134,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 
approximately 123 square miles. See also Appendix A. 
Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was 
initiated in August 1970 and completed in July 1974. 
The 405 tracts of land required for the project have been 
acquired. The Federal cost ofthe project was $56,267,422. 
The Sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated 
$27,880,000, exclusive of interest, for cost allocated to 
water supply. 
17-2
and is scheduled for completion in September 1996. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. There are 79 terminals along the 
Kanawha River located from the mouth of the river to 30 
miles east of Charleston, WV. These terminals are 
constructed principally of steel and wood mooring piles 
and steel pile mooring cells. Seventeen of these terminals 
have railroad connections. One terminal, a paved wharf, 
is owned by the City of Charleston, WV. The remaining 
terminals are privately owned. The principal commodities 
handled are coal, chemicals, acids, cement, gasoline and 
oil, and sand and gravel. For further details see the 1962 
Annual Report. 
Operations during the fiscal year. The Locks and 
Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs 
and improvements were made to the locks and dams as 
well as to the appurtenant structures and grounds. 
Channel inspections were conducted periodically. There 
was no dredging by hired labor on the Kanawha River in 
FY 95. Dredging by contract on the Kanawha River 
including Elk River was 76,270 cubic yards at $298,413. 
3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River 
See this heading under Chapter 19 - Ohio River. 
4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects 
See Table 17-C.

Huntington, WV, District 
Local cooperation. For details of required local 
cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. 
Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is 
complete. The project was operated for the benefit of 
flood control as required, and necessary repairs were 
made to the structure and appurtenances. During the 
fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated 
to be $4,643,000. To date, the project has prevented an 
estimated $67,237,000 in flood damages. 
6. Beech Fork Lake, WV 
Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, 
WV, on Beech Fork Creek, a tributary of Twelvepole 
Creek, approximately four miles above the mouth of 
Beech Fork Creek and 20 miles above the confluence of 
Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
rolled earth-fill dam 86 feet in height and 1,080 feet in 
length, an uncontrolled spillway landward of the left 
abutment of the dam with a control structure at the 
upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 
37,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 
approximately 78 square miles. Construction of the dam 
was initiated in December 1972 and completed in 
February 1977. See also AppendixA. Atotalof 485 tracts 
of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the 
project was $41,987,500. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and maintenance. The entire project is 
complete. The project was operated for flood control as 
required and necessary repairs were made to the structure 
and appurtenances. To date the project has prevented 
an estimated $4,486,000 in flood damages. 
7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 
Location. The damsite is located on the New River 
in Summers County, WV, approximately three miles 
above Hinton, WV, and one mile from the confluence of 
the New and Greenbrier Rivers. The reservoir is located 
in Summers County, WV, and Giles County, VA. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
concrete gravity dam 180 feet in height and 2,048 feet in 
length. Appurtenant structures consist of a gated spillway 
790 feet in length located in the channel section of the 
dam. The stilling pool is formed by a 23-foot-high weir 
located 364 feet downstream of 16 gated sluices through 
the spillway section and discharging into the stilling 
pool. Penstocks were installed at the time of construction 
to permit the future installation of hydropower. The 
reservoir provides for a total storage of 631,000 acre-feet. 
See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was 
initiated in January 1942 and completed in April 1952. 
A total of 338 tracts of land was acquired for the project. 
The Federal cost of the project was $29,458,652, which 
includes expenditures under the recreation at completed 
projects program. For further details see the 1939 and 
1962 Annual Reports. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and 
Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The 
reservoir was operated for flood control as required and 
necessary repairs were made to the structure and 
appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project 
prevented flood damages estimated to be $116,848,000. 
To date, the project has prevented an estimated 
$781,948,000 in flood damages. 
8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 
Location. The damsite is located in Braxton County, 
WV, on the Little Kanawha River, approximately two 
miles above Burnsville, WV, and 124 miles above the 
confluence of the Little Kanawha River and the Ohio 
River. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of an 
earth embankment dam 80 feet in height and 1,000 feet 
in length with a gated spillway in the left abutment. The 
outlet works is an integral part of the spillway, consisting 
of five sluice gates and one low flow sluice. The reservoir 
provides for a total storage of 65,400 acre-feet and controls 
a drainage area of approximately 165 square miles. 
Construction of the dam was initiated in June 1973 and 
completed in February 1976. See also Appendix A. The 
357 tracts of land required for the project have been 
acquired. The Federal cost of the project to date has been 
$57,166,839. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during the fiscal year. The project is 
completed. The project was operated for flood control as 
required and necessary repairs were made to the structure 
and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project 
prevented flood damages estimated to be $145,000. To 
date, the project has prevented an estimated $34,488,000 
in flood damage. 
9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 
Location. The damsite is located in Pickaway County, 
approximately seven miles south of Mount Sterling, OH, 
on Deer Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, 
17-3

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
approximately 21 miles above the mouth of Deer Creek 
and approximately 106 miles above the mouth of the 
Scioto River. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet in height and 3,880 feet in 
length, a 741-foot concrete gravity channel section 
controlled by three tainter gates, an outlet works 
consisting offive gated sluices through a concrete spillway 
section discharging into a stilling basin and an earth dike 
15 feet by 4,600 feet in a saddle located approximately 
four miles southwest of the damsite. The reservoir 
provides a total storage of 102,540 acre-feet and controls 
a drainage area of approximately 278 square miles. 
Construction of the dam was completed in May 1968. 
The 138 tracts of land required for the project have been 
acquired. For further project details see the 1965 Annual 
Report. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost of the 
project is $20,406,545, including expenditures under the 
recreation at completed projects program. 
Local cooperation. For details of required local 
cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and 
Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The 
reservoir was operated for flood control as required and 
necessary repairs were made to the structure and 
appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated 
$360,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To 
date, the project has prevented an estimated $23,552,000 
in flood damages. 
10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 
Location. The damsite is located on the Olentangy 
River, approximately six miles above and north of 
Delaware, OH, and approximately 32 miles above the 
confluence of the Olentangy and Scioto Rivers at 
Columbus, OH. The reservoir is located in Delaware, 
Marion and Morrow Counties, OH. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
rolled earth-fill dam with a gate controlled ogee type 
spillway and five outlet conduits in the channel. The dam 
is 18,600 feet in length and 92 feet in height. The project 
provides for storage of 132,800 acre-feet and controls a 
drainage area of approximately 381 square miles. 
Construction of the dam was initiated in April 1946 and 
completed in July 1948. For further details see the 1962 
Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate 
requirements of 7,703 acres of fee acquisition and 2,428 
acres of flowage easements have been completed. The 
Federal cost for the project was $7,631,821. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and 
Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The 
reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as 
required, and necessary repairs were made to the 
structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an 
estimated $1,603,000 in flood damages during the fiscal 
year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated 
$68,257,000 in flood damages. 
11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 
Location. The damsite is located on Johns Creek, 
approximately seven miles southeast of Paintsville, KY, 
and approximately six miles above the confluence of 
Johns Creek and the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of an 
earthfill dam 118 feet in height and 913 feet in length, a 
controlled outlet works discharging through a channel 
excavated in the left abutment, and a rolled earth-fill 
dike blocking a low divide to Brandykeg Creek and the 
Levisa Fork. The reservoir provides a total storage of 
93,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 
approximately 207 square miles. Construction of the 
dam was initiated in March 1946 and completed in July 
1949. For further project detail see the 1965 Annual 
Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate 
requirements for the project were 12,458 acres in fee and 
1,170 acres in flowage easements. The Federal cost of the 
project was $7,845,547, including expenditures for 
recreation under the completed project program. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and 
Maintenance. All construction activities are complete. 
The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control 
as required and necessary repairs were made to the 
structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the 
project prevented flood damages estimated to be 
$1,127,000. To date, the project has prevented an 
estimated $56,349,000 in flood damages. 
12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 
Location. The damsite is located on the Licking 
River, approximately six miles above the confluence of 
the Licking and Muskingum Rivers at Zanesville, Ohio. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
rolled earth-fill dam 118 feet in height and 1,400 feet in 
length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 
20-foot conduit in the right abutment, and an ungated 
280-foot spillway adjacent to the left abutment of the 
dam, and two rolled earthfll dikes. The reservoir provides 
17-4

Huntington, WV, District 
for a total storage of 261,110 acre-feet and controls a 
drainage area of approximately 748 square miles. 
Construction of the dam was completed in July 1959. For 
further project details see the 1962 Annual Report. See 
also Appendix A. Total real estate required for the 
project consists of 8,232 acres in fee and 5,380 acres of 
flowage easements. See also Appendix A. Federal cost of 
the project was $30,218,135. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and 
Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The 
project was operated as required for flood control, and 
necessary repairs were made to the structure and 
appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project 
prevented flood damages estimated to be $6,768,000. To 
date, theprojecthas prevented an estimated $224,981,000 
in flood damages. 
13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 
Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, 
WV, approximately six miles southeast of Wayne, WV, 
10 miles above the mouth of East Fork and 42 miles above 
the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of an 
earth-fill dam 113 feet in height and 638 feet in length, 
an uncontrolled spillway near the left abutment of the 
dam, and a 13-foot reinforced concrete tunnel in the right 
abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. 
The reservoir provides for a total storage of 82,500 acrefeet 
and controls a drainage area of approximately 133 
square miles. The required 552 tracts of land have been 
acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs of the 
project was $85,872,963. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and 
Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The 
project was operated for flood control as required and 
necessary repairs were made to the structure and 
appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project 
prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,020,000. To 
date, the project has prevented an estimated $49,767,000 
in flood damages. 
14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 
Location. The damsite is located in Pike County, KY, 
on the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately 
15 miles upstream from Pikeville, KY, approximately 
three miles above the confluence of Levisa and Russell 
Forks and 103 miles above the mouth of the Levisa Fork. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
rock-fill dam 195 feet in height and 1,100 feet in length, 
a controlled spillway containing four tainter gates located 
in the valley wall adjacent to the left abutment of the 
dam, the outlet works consists of an intake structure 
with three conduits controlled by slide gates and 
discharging into a horseshoe shaped tunnel. The reservoir 
provides for a total storage of 164,360 acre-feet and 
controls a drainage area of approximately 395 square 
miles. The dam was completed in February 1969. The 
1,301 tracts of land required for the project have been 
acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the 
project was $54,754,126, which includes expenditures 
under the recreation at completed projects program. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and 
Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The 
project was operated for flood control as required, and 
necessary repairs were made to the structure and 
appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project 
prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,261,000. To 
date, the project has prevented an estimated $279,448,000 
in flood damages. 
15. Grayson Lake, KY 
Location. The damsite is located in Carter County, 
KY, on the Little Sandy River approximately 49 miles 
above the confluence with the Ohio River, and 11 miles 
upstream from Grayson, KY. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
random earthfill dam 120 feet in height and 1,460 feet in 
length, a controlled outlet works discharging though a 
14-foot spillway beyond the left abutment. The reservoir 
provides for a total storage of 119,000 acre-feet and 
controls a drainage area of approximately 196 square 
miles. The dam was completed in January 1968. The 484 
tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. 
See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project was 
$19,162,741, which includes expenditures for recreation 
facilities under the completed projects program. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and 
Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The 
reservoir was operated for flood control as required and 
necessary repairs were made to the structure and 
appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project 
prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,377,000. To 
date, the project has prevented an estimated $50,997,000 
in flood damages. 
17-5

Report of the Seoretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
16. John W. Flannagan Dam and Rerservoir, 
Ohio River Basin, VA 
Location. The damsite is located in Dickenson 
County, VA, approximately four miles northwest of Haysi, 
VA, on the Pound River approximately two miles above 
the confluence of the Pound River and Russell Fork and 
approximately 150 miles above the mouth of the Big 
Sandy River. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
rock-fill dam 252 feet in height and 970 feet in length, an 
outlet tunnel located near the left abutment of the dam 
with a control structure at the upstream end, a spillway 
controlled by six tainter gates located in a saddle just 
upstream from the damsite. The reservoir provides for a 
total storage of 145,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage 
area of approximately 222 square miles. The project was 
modified to include water quality control by adding 
control gates to the previously uncontrolled spillway, 
which increased the total storage capacity by 39,000 
acre-feet. The dam was completed in December 1963. 
The 382 tracts of land required for the project have been 
acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the 
project was $20,444,383, which includes expenditures 
for recreation under the completed projects program. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and 
Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The 
project was operated for flood control as required and 
necessary repairs were made to the structure and 
apputenances. During the fiscal year the project 
prevented flood damages estimated to be $116,000. To 
date, the project has prevented an estimated $147,595,000 
in flood damages. 
17. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy 
and Cumberland Rivers, WV, VA, and KY 
Location. The Levisa and Tug Forks form the Big 
Sandy River at Louisa, KY. The Cumberland portion is 
the Upper Cumberland River Basin above Cumberland 
Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in 
length and averages approximately 30 miles in width in 
the lower portion and approximately 10 miles in width 
above Harlan, KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the 
Huntington District, and the Cumberland Basin is within 
the Nashville District. This report covers that portion of 
the project located in the Huntington District. 
Existing project. The authorization language directs 
the Corps of Engineers to design and construct, at full 
Federal expense, such flood control measures as are 
determined to be necesssary and advisable for the 
communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper 
Cumberland River basins. The authorization further 
states that such flood control measures would be located 
at or in the vicinity of Pikeville, KY, and Grundy, VA, on 
the Levisa Fork; Pineville, KY, on the Cumberland 
River; and Williamson and Matewan on the Tug Fork, 
in order to afford the named communities and other 
flood damaged locations and their immediate environs a 
level of protection against flooding at least sufficient to 
prevent any future losses from the likelihood of flooding 
such as occurred in April 1977. The full funding estimate 
for the project is $733,200,000, which includes 
$39,100,000 non-Federal contributions. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Additional 
engineering studies are now underway to determine what 
is necessary and advisable to address the floodingproblems 
in both the Levisa Fork Basin and in the Tug Fork 
tributary stream areas. The contract for construction of 
the Pump Station at West Williamson, WV, was awarded 
inApri 11983 and is complete. The contract for construction 
of the floodwall at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in 
July 1986 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson 
Area Snagging and Clearing was awarded in September 
1987 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson 
Housing Development, Valley View Site, was awarded in 
September 1987 and is complete. The contract for the 
Floodwall and Pump Stations for the Williamson Central 
BusinessDistrictwasawardedinJune 1988 andiscomplete. 
The contract for South Williamson Housing 
Development, Pond Creek Site, was awarded in September 
1990 and is complete. The contract for Replacement 
Cafeteria, South Williamson, was awarded in June 1991 
and is complete. The contract for Construction of Local 
Protection Project, South Williamson, Kentucky, was 
awarded in December 1991 and is complete. The contract 
for Construction of Local Protection Project, Matewan, 
West Virginia, was awarded in August 1992 and is 76% 
complete. 
18. Massillon, OH 
Location. The project is located in Stark County, on 
the Tuscarawas River, approximately 200 miles above the 
mouth of the Muskingum River. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of 
channel improvement to the Tuscarawas River, combined 
with the construction of drainage facilities, levees and 
pump stations. For further details see the 1962 Annual 
Report. Construction was initiated in July 1940 and 
completed in October 1951. 
17-6

Huntington, WV, District 
Local cooperation. None required. See the 1962 
Annual Report for details of local contribution of work 
beyond the scope of the project. To date, the system has 
prevented an estimated $5,711,000 in flood damages. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections 
were conducted to determine that the improved channel 
was maintained in satisfactory condition. 
19. Muskingum River Lakes, OH 
Location. The Muskingum River lies in Southeast 
Ohio and including tributaries, drains approximately 
8,000 square miles. The headwaters rise about 25 miles 
south of Lake Erie and flow into the Ohio River at 
Marietta, OH, 172 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of the 
construction and operations and maintenance of 14 
reservoirs and appurtenant works in the Muskingum 
River Basin. The existing project originally authorized 
by the Public Works Administration in February 1934. 
Construction of the system was initiated in January 
1935 and completed in November 1938. The system was 
initially operated and maintained by the Muskingum 
Watershed Conservancy District of Ohio, the sponsoring 
agency, from July 1938 to August 1939 when operation 
and maintenance became the responsibility of the Corps 
of Engineers in accordance with the provisions of the 
1939 Flood Control Act. For further project details, see 
the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The cost 
of the project was $41,247,815, which includes 
expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed 
project program. A significant Major Rehabilitation 
program was approved in December 1977 in order to 
assure the integrity of the existing 14 structures under 
the originally designed maximum pool conditions. 
Underseepage and abutment seepage problems are being 
corrected through the installation of downstream blankets 
and/or relief wells and grouting. The estimated full 
funding cost of the rehabilitation program is $39,100,000 
in total, with $25,500,000 from the Construction, General 
Appropriation and $13,600,000 from the Operations and 
Maintenance, General Appropriation. A related but 
separate program entitled Dam Safety Assurance has 
beeninitiated. Undercurrent hydrologic design standards, 
deficiencies exist in the spillvays at all the 14 projects in 
the system. Correctivemeasuresinclude widening present 
spillways, constructing new spillways and installing 
parapet walls on top of the dams. The full funding estimate 
for the Dam Safety Assurance Program is $60,870,000. 
Local cooperation. All requirements for local 
cooperation have been met. For further details see the 
1942 Annual Report. 
Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: The 
Major Rehabilitation is continuing as scheduled. Thus 
far, twenty-one contracts have been awarded and the 
program is 65% complete. The Dam Safety Assurance 
program was initiated during FY 1982. Thus far ten 
contracts have been awarded and the Dam Safety 
Assurance program is 53% complete. 
Operations and Maintenance. The reservoirs were 
operated for flood control as required, and the necessary 
repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. 
The system prevented an estimated $17,145,000 in flood 
damages during the fiscal year. To date, the system has 
prevented an estimated $1,620,575,000 in flood damages. 
20. Newark, OH 
Location. The project is located in Licking County at 
the junction of the North and South Forks of the Licking 
River, approximately 29 miles above the confluence with 
the Muskingum River at Zanesville, OH. 
Existing project. For details of the existing project 
see the 1981 Annual Report. Construction of the existing 
project was initiated in July 1940 and completed in 
November 1941. As a result of the 1968 Flood Control Act 
the existingproject was modified to include improvement 
of the interior drainage facilities, construction of Log 
Pond Run diversion channel and modification of the 
North Fork Channel. Construction of the Log Pond Run 
diversion channel was awarded in September 1980 and 
completed in December 1981. The full funding estimate 
for the project is $11,455,000 Federal cost and $4,215,000 
non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. For details of required and 
completed local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. 
Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: North 
Fork Channel - As a result of withdrawal of State 
support for the Utica Lake project (now inactive) and the 
interdependency of the operation of Utica with the North 
Fork Channel, the North Fork Channel portion of the 
project required re-formulation. Areanalysis is complete. 
Engineering studies continued. The contract for 
construction ofNorth ForkChannel (Phase I) was awarded 
in September 1986 and is complete. The contract for 
construction of the remaining portion of North Fork 
Channel was awarded in February 1988 is complete. The 
contract for Remedial Treatment for Erosion was awarded 
in September 1991 and is 99% complete. 
Operations and Maintenance: Routine inspections 
were conducted to determine that the improved channel 
was maintained in satisfactory condition. 
17-7

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH 
Location. The damsite is located in Knox County, OH, 
on the North Branch of Kokosing River, approximately 
nine miles above the confluence of the Kokosing and North 
Branch Rivers, and two miles northwest of Fredericktown, 
OH.
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
rolled-earth dam, 70 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length 
with an uncontrolled spillway adjacent to the right 
abutment, and an uncontrolled, reinforced concrete outlet 
work located in the right abutment of the dam. The 
reservoir provides for a total storage of 14,885 acre-feet 
and controls a drainage area of approximately 45 square 
miles. The 56 tracts of land required for the project have 
been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in 
May 1972. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the 
project was $6,665,985, which includes expendituresunder 
the recreation at completed projects program. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and 
Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The 
reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the 
necessary repairs were made to the structure and 
appurtenances. 
22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA 
Location. The damsite is located in Wise County, VA, 
on the North Fork of Pound River, approximately one mile 
upstream from the confluence of the North and South 
Forks which form the Pound River and approximately 
three miles upstream from Pound, VA. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
rockfill dam, 130 feet in height and 600 feet in length, an 
uncontrolled spillway in a saddle upstream from the dam, 
and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control 
structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a 
total storage of 11,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage 
area of approximately 17 square miles. The 127 tracts of 
land required for the project have been acquired. 
Construction of the dam was completed in January 1966. 
See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was 
$6,186,901, which includes expenditures for recreation 
under the completed projects program. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and 
Maintenance. All construction is complete. The project 
wasoperatedasrequiredforfloodcontrolandthenecessary 
repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. 
The project prevented an estimated $1,000 in flood damages 
during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented 
an estimated $5,027,000 in flood damages. 
23. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) 
Location. The work covered by this project consists of 
a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements and 
dams and lakes in the Ohio River Basin within the 
Huntington District. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of the 
individual projects considered in the Ohio River Basin 
comprehensive plan within the Huntington District. 
Operations during the fiscal year. The completed 
localprotectionprojects, which areoperatedandmaintained 
by local interests, except for those local protection projects 
for which individual reports have been included. To date 
the project has prevented flood damages of an estimated 
cumulative total of $708,753,000. 
24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 
Location. The damsite is located in Ross County, OH, 
on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, 
approximately 37 miles above the mouth of Paint Creek 
and 100 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River and 
approximately four miles east of New Parkersburg, OH. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
rock and random earth fill dam, 118 feet in height and 700 
feet in length, a gate controlled spillway located near the 
right abutment, an outlet tunnel located in the right 
abutment with a control structure at the upstream end, 
and a random rockfill dike located at the right abutment 
of the spillway. The reservoir provides for a total storage 
of 145,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 
approximately 576 square miles. Construction of the dam 
was completed in July 1973. The 257 tracts of land 
required for the project have been acquired. See also 
Appendix A. Federal cost for the project was $26,969,962, 
which includes expenditures under the recreation at 
completed projects program. 
Local cooperation. For details of required local 
cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and 
Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The 
reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the 
necessary repairs were made to the structure and 
appurtenances. Duringthefiscalyeartheprojectprevented 
an estimated $579,000 in flood damages. To date, the 
project has prevented flood damages estimated to be 
$43,737,000. 
17-8

Huntington, WV, District 
25. Paintsville Lake, KY 
Location. The damsite is located in Johnson County, 
KY, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Levisa Fork of the 
Big Sandy River, approximately eight miles above the 
mouth of Paint Creek, and four miles west of Paintsville, 
KY. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
rockfill dam 153 feet in height and 1,560 feet in length, an 
uncontrolled spillway located southwest of the right 
abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right 
abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. 
The reservoir provides for a total storage of 76,642 acrefeet 
and controls a drainage area of approximately 93 
square miles. The 635 tracts of land required for the 
project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was 
initiated in September 1976 and was completed in 
September 1980. See also Appendix A. The full funding 
estimate for new work is $66,478,000, which includes 
$3,028,000 non-Federal Costs. The local sponsor has 
reimbursed the Government $377,000 for the cost sharing 
portion of recreation development. 
Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: 
Construction of the project is complete. 
Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was 
operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs 
were made to the structure and appurtenances. During 
the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages 
estimatedtobe $418,000. Todate, theprojecthasprevented 
flood damages estimated to be $6,521,000. 
26. R. D. Bailey Lake, WV 
Existing project. The damsite is located in Wyoming 
County, WV, on the Guyandotte River approximately 108 
miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and one 
mile east of Justice, WV. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
rolled rockfill dam with a concrete face, 305 feet in height 
and 1,330 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located 
in a saddle in the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet 
tunnel in the left abutment with a control structure 
located at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a 
total storage of 203,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage 
area of approximately 540 square miles. Construction of 
the dam was initiated in November 1973 and completed in 
December 1979. See also Appendix A. A total of 2,109 
tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost 
of the project to date has been $261,317,233. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was 
operatedforfloodcontrolasrequiredandnecessaryrepairs 
were made to the structure and appurtenances. During 
the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages 
estimated to be $644,000. To date, the project has 
prevented flood damages estimated to be $77,082,000. 
27. Roseville, OH 
Location. The project is located in Muskingum and 
Perry Counties, on Moxahala Creek, approximately six 
miles the confluence with Jonathan Creek, a tributary of 
the Muskingum River. 
Existing project. The existingproject consists of 7,291 
feet of channel improvement; 6,400 feet of levee and 
railroad embankment enlargements; and the necessary 
appurtenances for interior drainage. Total Federal cost of 
the project was $910,785. Construction was initiated in 
August 1959 and completed in October 1960. 
Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation 
have been completed. See also the 1962 Annual 
Report. Total costs of local requirements were $62,000. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Routineinspections 
of the improved portion of the project were conducted to 
determine that the project was maintained in satisfactory 
condition. During the fiscal year the project prevented 
flood damages estimated to be $15,000. To date, the project 
has prevented an estimated $1,167,000 in flood damages. 
28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 
Location. The damsite is located at Ruckers Bend in 
Nicholas County on the Gauley River approximately 35 
miles above the confluence of the Gauley and New River at 
Gauley Bridge, WV. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
rockfill dam having a height of 357 feet and a length of 
2,280 feet, an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a 
control structure located at the upstream end, an 
uncontrolled spillway located west of the right abutment 
and two earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total 
storage of 413,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area 
of 803 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of 
the dam was initiated in March 1960 and completed in 
March 1966. A total of 9,346 acres of land were acquired 
for the project. The Federal costs of the project was 
$48,375,884, which includes expenditures under the 
recreation at completed projects program. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during the fiscal year. All construction 
work is complete. The project was operated for flood 
control as required and necesssary repairs were made to 
17-9

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
the structures and appurtenances. During the fiscal year 
the project prevented flood damages estimated to be 
$6,663,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated 
$300,925,000 in flood damages. 
29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 
Location. The damsite is located on the Elk River in 
Braxton County approximately one mile above Sutton, 
WV, and 101 miles above the mouth of the Elk River. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
concrete gravity dam having a height of 220 feet and a 
length of 1,178 feet, a gated spillway in the channel section 
of the dam, comprised of six tainter gates supported by 
piers, an outlet works comprised of five gate sluices 
through the spillway section. The reservoir provides for a 
storage of 265,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area 
of 537 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of 
the dam was initiated in 1949 and completed in June 1960. 
The total cost of the project was $37,029,585. 
Local cooperation. None required. See the 1981 
Annual Report for contributed funds. 
Operations during the fiscal year. All construction 
work is complete. The project was operated for flood 
control as required and necessary repairs were made to the 
structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the 
projectpreventedflooddamagesestimatedtobe$1,040,000. 
To date, the project has prevented an estimated 
$211,597,000 in flood damages. 
30. Tom Jenkins Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH 
Location. The damsite is located in Athens County, on 
the East Branch of Sunday Creek, a tributary of the 
HockingRiver, approximatelythreemilesnorthofGlouster, 
OH, and 57 miles above the mouth of the Hocking River. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of a 
rolled-earth dam, 84 feet in height and 944 feet in length, 
a controlled works discharging through a tunnel in the left 
abutment, and an uncontrolled spillway in the ridge 
running south from the damsite. The reservoir, known as 
Burr Oak Lake, provides for a total storage of 26,900 acrefeet 
and controls a drainage area of approximately 33 
square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the 
project was initiated in March 1948 and completed in 
February 1950. A total of 100 acres of land were acquired 
for the project. The Federal costs of the project were 
$2,086,503, which includes expenditure for recreation at 
completed project. 
Local cooperation. All requirements of local 
cooperation have been met. See also the 1962 Annual 
Report. Contributed funds in the amount of $575,000 have 
been received from the State of Ohio. 
Operations during the fiscal year. All construction 
work is complete. The project was operated for flood 
control as required and necessary repairs were made to the 
structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the 
project prevented flood damages estimated to be $107,000. 
To date, the project has prevented an estimated $12,398,000 
in flood damages. 
31. West Columbus, OH 
Location. The project is located in Columbus, OH, 
along the Scioto River, adjacent to the downtown area in 
Franklin County, OH. 
Existing project. The project under construction 
consists of a 5.2-mile system including levee, floodwall and 
high ground: Fourteen gate closures, interior drainage 
facilities and construction of two new pump stations and 
reworking two existing pump stations. The protected area 
contains about 1,200 acres and is completely urban with a 
mixofresidential, industrial andcommercial development. 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required to 
provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; to verify 
orrelocatebuildings;utilities, roads,bridges (exceptrailroad 
bridges), and other facilities where necessary. Pay a cash 
contribution of at least 5%, as required by the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986, of the costs allocated 
to floodcontrol, andbearallcostsof operation, maintenance, 
and replacement of flood control facilities. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Funds to initiate 
preconstruction engineering and design were appropriated 
in Fiscal Year 1989 and funds to initiate construction were 
appropriated in FiscalYear 1993. The total estimated cost 
of the project is $107,000,000 of which $26,750,000 is non- 
Federal. The contract for Construction of Dry Run Levee 
Phase IA) was awarded in September 1993 and is 99% 
complete. The contract for construction of Dry Run Levee 
Phase [B was awarded in April 1995 and is 33% complete. 
32. Yatesville Lake, KY 
Location. The damsite is located in Lawrence County, 
on Blaine Creek, a tributary of the Big Sandy River, 
approximately five miles west of Louisa, KY, and 18 miles 
above the mouth of Blaine Creek. 
Existing project. The existing project consists of an 
earth and rockfill dam, 104 feet in height and 760 feet in 
length, an uncontrolled spillway located one-half mile 
southeast of the right abutment of the dam. The outlet 
works consists of a 13-foot diameter tunnel through the left 
17-10

Huntington, WV, District 
dam abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage 
of 86,951 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 
approximately 208 square miles. The 778 tracts of land 
required for the project have been acquired. Construction 
is scheduled for completion in December 1994. See also 
Appendix A. The full funding estimate for new work is 
$116,000,000, which includes $7,505,000 non-Federal costs 
for the cost sharing portion of recreation development. 
Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: All 
contracts for construction have been completed with the 
exception of the contract for Construction of Buildings, 
Grounds and Utilities was awarded in November 1992 and 
is complete. 
Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was 
operatedforfloodcontrolasrequiredandnecessaryrepairs 
were made to the structure and appurtenances. 
33. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 
TheFlood ControlActofJune 22,1936, andsubsequent 
acts require local interest to furnish assurances that they 
will operate and maintain certain local protection projects 
after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed 
by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are 
responsible for the administration of these regulations 
within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections 
were made during the fiscal year of those completed units 
transferredtolocalinterestsforoperationandmaintenance. 
Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures 
required to maintain the projects in accordance with the 
standards prescribed by regulations. Total costs for fiscal 
year 1995 were $106,779. Total cost to September 30, 
1995, were $2,038,891. The flood control works inspected 
and the dates of inspection are tabulated in Table H. 
34. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 
Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to 
Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 
79th Congress are tabulated as follows: 
Location FY 1995 Cost 
Cheshire, OH 
Kanawha River, Rt. 60, South Charleston, WV 
Kanawha River, Saint Albans, WV 
Mud River, Barboursville, WV 
Muskingum River, Marietta Harbor, OH 
Ohio River, Boat Levee, Marietta, OH 
Ohio River, Route 2, Near Pt. Pleasant, WV 
Twelvepole Creek, Wayne County, WV 
Riverside Drive, Saint Marys, WV 
Russell, KY 
Sewerline, Marietta, OH 
$ 3 
10,260 
374,836 
430,128 
3,244 
945 
10,605 
2,896 
-6,841 
20,976 
20,925 
Sewerline, Sistersville, WV 
State Route 62, Buffalo, WV 
Ohio River, Sewage Plant, Mason, WV 
889 
-7,715 
57 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 
1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 853, 80th Congress are 
tabulated as follows: 
Location 
Hargus Creek, Circleville, OH 
Spring Creek, Spencer, WV 
FY 1995 Cost 
$ 19,547 
177,212 
There were no snagging and clearing activities 
pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, 
Public Law 780, 83rd Congress during FY 1995. 
Work performed under special legislation pursuant to 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 as follows: 
Location FY 1995 Cost 
Environmental Restoration, WV $165,612 
Kanawha River, St. Albans, WV 18,728 
The costs for miscellaneous activities during FY 1995 
were $11,573. 
Flood control and coastal emergency activities pursuant 
to Public Law 99, 84th Congress were conducted as required 
during FY 1995 at a cost of $245,428. 
National emergency management activities were 
accomplished by the district as required. The costs for 
these activities during FY 1995 were $119,246. 
35. Surveys 
Fiscal year 1995 costs were $5,304,149 itemized as 
follows: 
Location 
Navigation Studies 
Flood Damage Prevention Studies 
Special Studies 
Comprehensive Basin Studies 
Review of Authorized Projects 
Miscellaneous Activities 
Coordination Studies 
Preconstruction Engineering and Design 
Advance Engineering and Design 
36. Collection and Study of Basic Data 
Fiscal year costs were $91,618. 
FY 1995 Cost 
$ 677,386 
467,523 
409,944 
28,531 
162,242 
106,562 
14,513 
3,345,830
0 
17-11

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
Table 17-A Cost and Financial Statement 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
2. Kanawha River, 
WV 
(Existing Project) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
9,277,000 9,051,000 
9,265,713 8,836,463 
11,021,000 8,185,000 
10,447,961 8,542,729 
27,853,699 ' 
27,853,699 1 
140,129,468 2 
139,633,591 2 
130,984 3 
130,984 3 
2. Winfield L&D 
5. Alum Creek Lake, 
OH 
6. Beech Fork Lake, 
WV 
7. Bluestone Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, 
WV 
8. Burnsville Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, 
WV 
9. Deer Creek Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, 
OH 
10. Delaware Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, 
OH 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
8,214,000 11,770,000 74,768,000 19,352,000 156,672,000 4 
8,014,027 8,614,131 18,973,754 42,407,008 118,755,624 5 
56,267,442 
56,267,442 
617,000 557,000 702,000 663,000 
630,933 568,610 672,158 678,260 
791,200 871,000 1,187,500 1,092,000 
810,092 858,278 1,187,719 1,074,138 
1,189,700 1,244,000 2,338,000 3,495,000 
1,204,816 1,200,143 2,265,346 2,607,353 
15,913 3,700 
1,392,700 1,365,000 
1,377,257 1,262,956 
1,244,000 1,402,000 
1,335,460 1,416,959 
510,100 568,000 732,000 1,075,000 
502,300 561,467 742,055 950,335 
9,579,973 
9,549,358 
41,987,500 
41,987,500 
12,154,549 
12,113,499 
29,458,652 6 
29,458,652 6 
24,676,716 
23,643,501 
57,166,839 
57,166,839 
17,169,947 
17,135,707 ' 
20,406,545 8 
20,406,545 8 
10,696,182 9 
10,556,463 9 
7,631,821 
7,631,821 
921,800 2,025,000 1,550,700 699,000 
1,007,063 1,902,903 1,529,360 795,834 
15,424,95810 
15,344,34710 
17-12

Huntington, WV, District 
Table 17-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
11. Dewey Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, 
KY 
12. Dillon Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, 
OH 
13. East Lynn Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, 
WV 
14. Fishtrap Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, 
KY 
15. Grayson Lake, 
KY 
16. John W. Flannagan 
Dam & Reservoir, 
Ohio River Basin, 
VA 
17. Levisa & Tug Forks 
of the Big Sandy & 
Cumberland Rivers, 
KY, WV, & VA 
18. Massillon, OH 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Dam Safety 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
1,242,000 1,442,000 1,301,800 1,563,000 
1,277,492 1,441,241 1,305,633 1,501,082 
335,000 
307,026 
404,300 510,000 455,000 636,500 
393,360 518,874 470,770 583,538 
47,987,000 
47,993,348 
1,344,800 
1,311,440 
1,340,000 1,730,000 1,523,000 
1,367,742 1,650,770 1,565,442 
50,000 100,000 
83,791 
1,201,200 1,422,000 
1,202,034 1,399,017 
-66,000 
209 
2,097,000 1,604,000 
2,115,933 1,565,705 
894,600 967,000 918,700 1,021,500 
901,028 974,264 926,715 1,003,257 
1,419,000 1,217,000 1,483,400 1,595,000 
1,413,607 1,191,052 1,469,849 1,596,951 
7,845,54711 
7,845,54711 
23,131,22312 
23,069,04812 
440,000 
308,211 
30,218,13513 
30,218,13513 
8,804,655 
8,748,966 
85,872,963 
85,872,963 
20,479,55114 
20,410,96914 
54,754,12615 
54,754,12615 
17,233,26016 
17,141,51016 
19,162,74117 
19,162,74117 
15,028,642 
14,999,557 
20,444,383 18s 
20,444,28318 
20,017,83219 
19,924,82719 
17,654,000 40,788,000 37,339,000 24,490,000 316,873,000 20 
14,736,411 21,717,066 25,986,852 28,892,121 281,534,92220 
800 
2,984 2,278 
5,000 
1,492 
-2,000 
532 
8,139,40621 
8,139,40621 
349,248 
348,151 
17-13

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
Table 17-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
19. Muskingum River 
Dams & Lakes, 
OH 
Newark, OH 
(Previous Project) 
(Existing Project) 
21. North Branch of 
Kokosing River 
Lake, OH 
22. North Fork of 
Pound River Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, 
VA 
23. Ohio River Basin 
24. Paint Creek Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, 
OH 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
(Rehab.) 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Dam Safety 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
- - - - 41,247,8152 
- 41,247,81522 
5,003,800 5,249,000 6,740,300 7,484,000 101,571,70323 
4,925,831 4,980,716 6,857,419 6,239,207 99,948,4983 
145 
-42,000 
11,683 
849,000 
1,639,648 
1,577 
10,000 
156,035 
-64,000 
9,073 
26,000 
0 
982,300 
982,300 
22,172,94524 
22,172,94524 
27,230,000 
27,204,000 
845,916 
845,916 
-90,000 
271,308 
-10,000 
31,350 33,450 8,641 
265,000 179,000 224,000 164,000 
492,144 176,901 220,209 162,153 
342,200 251,000 306,000 395,000 
338,307 251,485 314,233 364,950 
598,100 537,000 638,200 675,000 
600,810 536,865 630,010 675,240 
758,673 
758,673 
10,869,512 
10,846,006 
6,665,985" 
6,665,98525 
3,165,042 
3,153,975 
6,186,90126 
6,186,90126 
7,482,04627 
7,447,89127 
355,86128 
355,86128 
26,969,962" 
26,969,962w 
9,834,9843 
9,778,1623 
17-14 
20.

Huntington, WV, District 
Table 17-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
25. Paintsville Lake, 
KY 
26. R. D. Bailey Lake, 
WV 
27. Roseville, OH 
28. Summersville Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, 
WV 
29. Sutton Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, 
WV 
30. Tom Jenkins Dam, 
OH 
31. West Columbus, 
OH 
32. Yatesville Lake, 
KY 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
10,000 
137,508 8,013 
50,000 
763,300 781,000 954,000 1,092,000 
757,973 737,391 989,180 1,068,291 
225,000 
1,069 
1,289,800 
1,310,489 
-1,200 
4,419 
-225,000 
6,834 
1,428,000 
1,428,163 
5,000 
1,528 
1,461,300 1,566,000 
1,459,313 1,536,372 
-1,700 
3,094 
4,000 
1,342 
1,310,200 1,274,000 1,470,000 1,613,000 
1,312,501 1,222,676 1,484,739 1,578,347 
1,465,100 1,700,000 2,437,000 1,784,000 
1,440,660 1,694,003 2,439,695 1,796,001 
218,000 277,000 368,000 378,000 
226,249 264,079 371,280 358,797 
3,340,000 10,000,000 6,734,000 
1,958,156 3,769,160 4,013,541 
1,749,000 
1,442,034 
906,300 
898,495 
1,395,000 
1,944,591 
976,000 
970,431 
1,206,000 
1,301,727 
1,172,000 1,177,000 
1,121,282 1,150,118 
60,251,147 
60,194,986 
9,481,632 
9,429,417 
261,317,23331 
261,317,23331 
20,571,30732 
20,490,03732 
910,785 
910,785 
243,577 
240,842 
48,375,8843 
48,375,88433 
26,621,16634 
26,524,37434 
37,029,58535 
37,029,58535 
31,352,14536 
31,301,541 
2,086,50337 
2,086,50337 
6,130,339 
6,093,015 
20,074,00038 
9,740,8573 
99,229,500 
98,765,784 
4,861,450 
4,763,835 
See page 17-16 for footnotes. 
17-15

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
1Includes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects, 
$4,498,636 Emergency Relief funds, $9,004,800 Public Works 
funds and $686,317 Code 713 funds. 
2lncludes $3,883,513 for maintenance of previous projects 
and $546,090 Maintenance and Operation funds. 
3Public Works Acceleration funds. 
4lncludes $78,336,000 Inland Waterways Trust funds. 
5Includes $57,822,237 Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 
6lncludes $543,960 Emergency Relief funds, $9,698 Public 
WorksAcceleration funds, $211,850 Code 711 funds and $75,000 
Code 713 funds. 
'Includes $747,028 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 
8Excludes $225,090 contributed funds. Includes $590,000 
Code 711 funds. 
9Includes $130,000 providedbytheProductive Employment 
Act of 1983. 
'l�Includes $240,000 providedbythe Productive Employment 
Act of 1983. 
"Includes $23,087 Public Works Acceleration funds, 
$1,089,940 Code 711 funds and $231,105 Code 713 funds. 
12Includes $82,900 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and 
$747,028 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 
13lIncludes $100,000 provided from the Productive 
Employment Act of 1983. 
"4Includes $209,918 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds 
and $747,028 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 
15Includes $362,649 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 
funds. 
'6Includes $38,000 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and 
$47,129 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 
'?7Includes $406,919 Code 711funds and $2,317 Code 713 funds. 
'8Includes $422,983 Code 711 funds. 
t'Includes $88,710 special recreation use fees. 
2Includes Cost from Ohio River Division of $696,000. 
21lIncludes $477,813 contributed funds. 
"Includes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovery funds 
and $528,288 Code 711 funds. 
"Includes $198,578 Maintenance and Operations funds. 
2'Includes $61,945 Public Works Acceleration funds. 
*Includes $45,177 Code 711 funds. 
26Includes $64,233 Code 711 funds. 
27Includes $68,200 special recreation use fees. 
"Includes $10,920 Emergency Relief funds. 
29 lIncludes $14,153 Code 711 funds. 
�Includes $31,496 special recreation use fee funds. 
31Includes $5,534 Consolidated Army funds. 
32Includes $60,000 provided from the Productive 
Employment Act of 1983, and $66,678 Maintenance and 
Operations Funds. 
33Includes $300,062 Code 711 funds. 
"Includes $214,112 special recreation use fee funds, 
$300,000 provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriations Act of 1983, and $66,678 Maintenance and 
Operation Funds. 
35Includes $1,837,337 Code 711 funds and $287,843 
Accelerated Public Works funds. Excludes $62,800 contributed 
funds. 
36Includes $267,634 special recreation use fee funds, 
$215,000 provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriations Act of 1983, and $142,078 Maintenance and 
Operations Funds. 
"'Includes $8,064 Code 711 funds and $30,000 Public Works 
Acceleration funds. Excludes $575,000 contributed funds. 
"Excludes $2,167,533 contributed funds. 
17-16

Huntington, WV, District 
Table 17-B Authorizing Legislation 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
2. Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 15, 1985 
5. Oct. 23, 1962 
6. Oct. 23, 1962 
7. Jun. 28, 1938 
Dec. 22, 1944 
8. Jun. 28, 1938 
Dec. 22, 1944 
Jun. 28, 1938 
10. Jun. 28, 1938 
Dec. 22, 1944 
11. Jun. 28, 1938 
Dec. 22, 1944 
12. Jun. 28, 1938 
Dec. 22, 1944 
KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV 
Construction of three locks and dams on the Kanawha 
River and one on the Ohio River. 
Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition for 
Winfield Locks and Dam. 
ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
BEECH FORK LAKE, WV 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
Added Recreation 
Deleted Power 
BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
Added Recreation 
DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
Added Recreation 
DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
Added Recreation 
DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
Added Recreation 
H. Doc. 31, 73rd Cong., 
1st Sess. 
P.L. 88, 99th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 587, 87th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 520, 87th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 91, 74th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Flood Control Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
P.L. 534 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Flood Control Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Flood Control Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Flood Cotrol Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Flood Control Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
17-17

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
Table 17-B (cont'd) Authorizing Legislation 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
13. Jun. 28, 1938 
Dec. 22, 1944 
14. Jun. 28, 1938 
Dec. 22, 1944 
Jul. 14, 1960 
16. Jun. 28, 1938 
Dec. 22, 1944 
17. Oct. 1, 1980 
18. Jun. 28, 1938 
19. Feb. 20, 1934 
Jun. 28, 1938 
Aug. 11, 1939 
20. Jun. 28, 1938 
Aug. 13, 1968 
21. Oct. 23, 1962 
EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
Added Recreation. 
FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
Added Recreation. 
GRAYSON LAKE, KY 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, 
OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
Added Recreation. 
LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY 
RIVER, AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, KY, WV 
Construction of such Flood Control Measures as deemed 
Necessary and Advisable. 
MASSILLON, OHIO 
Construction of Channel Improvement Project. 
MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH 
Construction of 14 Flood Control Reservoirs. 
Reimbursement to the Muskingum Conservancy 
District a sum not to exceed actual expenditures 
for project construction. 
Operations and Maintenance assigned to 
the Corps of Engineers. 
NEWARK, OHIO 
Construction of Channel Improvement Project. 
Modification to Existing Project and Additional 
Channel Improvement and Drainage Facilities. 
NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
Flood Control Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Flood Control Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 440, 86th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Flood Control Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Sect. 202, P.L. 367, 
96th Cong., 2nd Sess. 
Flood Control Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Public Works Admin. 
Flood Control Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
P.L. 396, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Flood Control Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 337, 90th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 220, 87th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
17-18 
15.

Huntington, WV, District 
Table 17-B (cont'd) Authorizing Legislation 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
22. Jul. 14, 1960 
24. Jun. 28, 1938 
Dec. 22, 1944 
25. Oct. 27, 1965 
26. Oct. 23, 1962 
27. Jun. 28, 1938 
28. Jun. 28, 1938 
Dec. 22, 1944 
29. Jun. 28, 1938 
Dec. 22, 1944 
30. Dec. 22, 1944 
31. Nov. 17, 1986 
32. Oct. 27, 1965 
33. Jun. 22, 1936 
NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
Added Recreation 
PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
ROSEVILLE, OH 
Construction of Channel Improvement Project. 
SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
Added Recreation 
SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
Added Recreation 
TOM JENKINS DAM, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
WEST COLUMBUS, OH 
Construction of Local Protection Project. 
YATESVILLE LAKE, KY 
Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 
INSPECTIONS OF COMPLETED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
Inspection of Local Maintenance of Federally 
Constructed Local Protection Projects. 
H. Doc. 645, 86th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Flood Control Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 569, 87th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Flood Control Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Flood Control Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Flood Control Comm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 762, 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
P.L. 662, 99th Congr. 
H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
P.L. 738, 74th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
17-19

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
Table 17-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 
For Last 
Full Report Operation Contributed 
See Annual and Funds 
Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended 
Big Sandy River 
WV and KY including 
Levisa and Tug Forks2 1952 1,586,236 1,569,811' 131,473 
Elk River, WV 1903 30,259 
Gauley River, WV4 1903 14,761 
Guyandotte River, WV6 1915 27,500 
Little Kanawha River, WV6 1960 470,536 1,023,854 
Muskingum River, OH7 1955 301,912 6,171,897 6,041 
New River, WA and VA5 1899 109,691 
Scioto River at Portsmouth, OH8 1953 10,951 16,593 
'in addition, $140,068 expended from funds transferred 
from Department of Commerce, under acceleratedpublic works 
program, for repairs of eroded bank at lock 3 on Big Sandy 
River, at Louisa, KY. 
2Operation and Maintenance suspended June 30, 1952. 
3Work closed September 1902. Property transferred to 
Kanawha River improvements. 
4Work closed September 1902. Abandonment recommended 
in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress. 
5Work suspended. 
6Operation and maintenance suspended June 30, 1951. 
7Collections from license non-Federal hydroelectricutilities 
for use of dams on Muskingum River for fiscal years 1923-1953 
were $79,154. 
8Private Law 954, August 31,1954, authorized Secretary of 
Treasury to pay Portsmouth Sand and Gravel Co. $75,000 in 
full settlement of claims against Government for damages 
resulting from change in Scioto River Channel. 
17-20

Huntington, WV, District 
Table 17-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 
For Last 
Full Report Operation Contributed 
See Annual and Funds 
Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended 
Completed Local Protection Projects 
Ashland, KY 1954 3,718,839 --- --- 
Athens, OH 1979 5,313,700 --- --- 
Cattletsburg, KY 1963 3,854,361 --- --- 
Ceredo-Kenova, WV 1955 2,753,551 --- --- 
Chillicothe, OH 1986 20,373,314 ---.-- 
East Rainelle, WV 1962 614,598 --- --- 
Galax, VA 1953 480,536 --- --- 
Huntington, WV 1956 7,172,840 --- --- 
Ironton, OH 1952 2,604,646 --- --- 
Maysville, KY 1959 6,493,747 --- --- 
Parkersburg, WV 1955 6,652,827 --- --- 
Pt. Pleasant, WV 1955 2,919,578 --- --- 
Portsmouth-New Boston, OH 1956 9,806,424 --- --- 
Princeton, WV 1962 808,750 --- --- 
Russell, KY 1953 552,493 --- --- 
Williamson, WV 1964 1,056,166 --- --- 
Inactive Local Protection Projects 
Augusta, KY --- 11,577 --- --- 
Coal River, WV 1979 472,229 --- --- 
Vanceburg, KY ---...-. 
Deferred Local Protection Projects 
Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) 1983 --- --- --- 
Oceana, WV 1981 611,000 --- --- 
Inactive Reservoirs and Lakes 
Haysi, VA --- 2,656 --- --- 
Deferred Reservoir and Lakes 
Kehoe Lake, KY 1981 1,272,740 --- --- 
Active Authorized Projects with no current year expenditures. 
Martin, KY 1983 212,048 --- --- 
17-21

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
Table 17-G Deauthorized Projects 
All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Funds Funds 
Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended 
Aberdeen, OH --- May 1981 1,334 --- 
Athalia, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Belpre, OH --- Nov 1977 ------ 
Brooklyn, WV --- Nov 1979 --- --- 
Buena Vista, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Chambersburg, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Chesapeake, OH --- Nov 1986 --- --- 
Cheshire, OH --- Nov 1977 --- --- 
Chilo, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Clifton, WV --- Aug 1977 11,237 --- 
Coal Grove, OH --- Jan 1990 3,389 --- 
Columbus, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Dover, KY --- Jan 1990 --- --- 
Friendly, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Fullerton, KY --- Jan 1990 --- --- 
Gallipolis, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Greenup, KY --- Jan 1990 4,962 --- 
Hanging Rock, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Hartford, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Henderson, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Higginsport, OH --- Oct 1978 --- --- 
Hockingport, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Letart, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Letart Falls, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV --- Nov 1986 17,721 --- 
Manchester, OH --- May 1981 ------ 
Mapleshade, OH --- Oct 1978 --- --- 
Marietta, OH --- Nov 1981 ------ 
Mason, WV --- Aug 1977 ------ 
Middleport, OH --- May 1981 9,783 --- 
Miller, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Millwood, WV --- Aug 1977 ---.-- 
New Martinsville, WV --- Nov 1979 --- --- 
New Matamoras, OH --- Aug 1977 ---.-- 
Newport, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Normal, KY --- Jan 1990 --- --- 
Pomeroy, OH --- Aug 1977 ------ 
Portland, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Proctorville, OH --- Nov 1986 --- --- 
Racine, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Ripley, OH --- Oct 1978 7,523 --- 
Riverview, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
St. Mary's, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Sardis, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Sciotoville, OH --- Aug 1977 ---.-- 
Sistersville, OH --- Aug 1977 ---.-- 
South Point, OH --- Nov 1986 ---.-- 
South Portsmouth, KY --- Jan 1990 ---.-- 
Syracuse, OH --- Aug 1977 ---.-- 
Waverley, WV --- Aug 1977 ---.-- 
Williamstown, WV --- Nov 1979 ---.-- 
Zanesville, OH --- May 1981 ---.-- 
17-22

Huntington, WV, District 
Table 17-G (cont'd) Deauthorized Projects 
All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Funds Funds 
Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended 
Reservoirs and Lakes 
Big Bend, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- 
Big Darby, OH 1969 Nov 1979 3,349,568 --- 
Birch, WV --- Nov 1986 --- -- 
Frazeysburg, OH --- May 1981 5,000--- 
Leading Creek, WV 1974 Jan 1990 272,880 --- 
Logan, OH --- Oct 1985 --- --- 
Millersburg, OH --- May 1981 --- --- 
Mill Creek, OH 1981 Nov 1981 1,602,702 --- 
Moores Ferry, VA --- Nov 1986 22,879 --- 
Mud River, WV --- Nov 1979 --- --- 
Panther Creek, WV 1976 Nov 1986 --- --- 
Poca, WV --- May 1981 --- --- 
Rocy Fork, OH 1950 Aug 1977 91,321 --- 
Salt Creek, OH 1975 Nov 1986 1,089,943 --- 
Utica, OH 1975 Jan 1990 757,550 --- 
West Fork, WV 1974 Jan 1990 663,192 --- 
White Oak Creek, OH --- Nov 1981 --- --- 
17-23

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
Table 17-H Inspection of Flood Control Projects (See Section 33 of Text) 
Flood Control Works Inspected Dates of Inspection 
Ashland, KY 
Athens, OH 
Berwind, WV 
Bramwell, WV 
Cairo, WV 
Canton (Nimishillen), OH 
Catlettsburg, KY 
Ceredo-Kenova, WV 
Chillicothe, OH 
East Rainelle, WV 
Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV 
Fourpole Creek, WV 
Galax, VA 
Grahn, KY 
Griffithsville-Yawkey, WV 
Hitchins, KY 
Huntington, WV 
Inez, KY 
Ironton, OH 
Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, WV 
Maysville, KY 
Montcalm, WV 
Mount Vernon, OH 
Newark, OH 
Olive Hill, KY 
Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH 
Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH 
Parkersburg, WV 
Pax, WV 
Point Pleasant, WV 
Portsmouth-New Boston, OH 
Prestonsburg, KY 
Princeton, WV 
Richwood and Fenwick, WV 
Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY 
Ripley, WV 
Roseville, OH 
Russell, KY 
Smithfield, WV 
South Williamson, KY 
Utica, OH 
West Union, Middle Island, WV 
West Williamson, WV 
Williamson, WV 
May 95 Oct 95 
May 95 
Aug 95 
Aug 95 
Sep 95 
Sep 95 
May 95 Oct 95 
Apr 95 Sep 95 
Apr 95 Oct 95 
Sep 95 
Sep 95 
Dec 95 
Aug 95 
Oct 95 
NOT INSPECTED 
NOT INSPECTED 
Apr 95 Aug 95 
Oct 95 
Apr 95 Sep 95 
Sep 94 
May 95 Nov 95 
Aug 95 
Sep 95 
Jun 95 Oct 95 
Oct 95 
Oct 95 
Oct 95 
May 95 Nov 95 
Oct 95 
May 95 Nov 95 
May 95 Oct 95 
Mar 95 Oct 95 
Aug 95 
Sep 95 
NOT INSPECTED 
Sep 95 
Jun 95 
Apr 95 Sep 95 
Sep 95 
May 95 Oct 95 
Aug 95 
Sep 95 
May 95 Oct 95 
May 95 Oct 95 
17-24

PITTSBURGH, PA DISTRICT *
This District comprises part of eastern Ohio, western 
Pennsylvania, southwestern New York, northern 
West Virginia, and northwestern Maryland embraced in 
drainage basin of Ohio River and Tributaries above mile 
127 (below Pittsburgh), immediately upstream from New 
Martinsville, W. Va. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation - Locks and Dams... . ... Page 
1. Allegheny River, PA.... . . . . . . . . . . . 18-2 
2. Construction of locks and dams,Ohio River... . 18-2 
3. Monongahela River, PA and WV... . . . . . . . 18-2 
4. Open-channel work, Ohio River... . . . . . . . 18-3 
5. Tygart Lake, WV... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-3 
6. Other authorized navigation projects ...... 18-4 
Flood Control - Local Protection 
7. Chartiers Creek, PA... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
8. Elkins, WV... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
9. Johnstown, PA................... 
10. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA... . . . . 
11. South Central, PA Environmental Restoration 
12. Turtle Creek, PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
18-4 
18-4 
18-5 
18-5 
18-5 
18-6 
Flood Control - Reservoirs 
13. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH... . . . . . 18-6 
14. Conemaugh River Lake,Ohio River Basin, PA. 18-6 
15. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.. . 18-7 
16. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, PA...............18-7 
17. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, 
Ohio River Basin, PA and NY . . . . . . . . . 18-7 
18. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA...... 18-8 
19. Mahoning Creek Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, PA .............. 18-8 
20. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, 
Ohio River Basin, OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-8 
21. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH . 18-9 
22. Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) . . . . . 18-9 
23. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 
and OH ..................... 18-9 
24. Stonewall Jackson Lake, 
Ohio River Basin, WV... . . . . . . . . . . . 18-10 
25. 
26. 
27. 
28. 
29. 
30. 
31. 
Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ..... 18-10 
Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA. . . . 18-11 
Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA. 18-11 
Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 
and MD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-11 
Inspection of completed flood control projects. 18-12 
Other authorized flood control projects . . . . 18-12 
Flood control work under special 
authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-12 
General Investigations 
32. Surveys..................... 
33. Collection and study of basic data... . . . 
34. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design... 
35. Research and development... . . . . . . . 
36. Project Modifications for Improvement 
of Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
18-12 
18-12 
18-12 
18-12 
18-12 
Tables 
Table 18-A Cost & Financial Statement. . . . . 18-13 
Table 18-B Authorizing Legislation . . . . . . . 18-17 
Table 18-C Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects ................ 18-21 
Table 18-D Not Applicable. 
Table 18-E Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-22 
Table 18-F Not Applicable. 
Table 18-G Deauthorized Projects . . . . . . . . 18-24 
Table 18-H Allegheny River Statistics . . . . . 18-25 
Table 18-I Monongahela River Statistics . . . . 18-26 
Table 18-J Monongahela River Total Costs. . . 18,28 
Table 18-K Ohio River Basin Reservoirs ..... 18-28 
Table 18-L Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects ............ 18-29 
Table 18-M Flood Control Work Under Special 
Authorization.... . . . . . . . . . . . 18-30 
18-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Navigation - Locks and Dams 
L ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA 
Location. The Allegheny River is 321 miles long. It 
rises in northern Pennsylvania, flows northwestward 
into New York, thence generally southwestward to Pittsburgh, 
PA, where it joins with Monongahela River to form 
the Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for western 
Pennsylvania and southwestern New York.) 
Existing project. The project consists of eight locks 
and dams to afford slack-water navigation for a length of 
72 miles from Pittsburgh, PA to above East Brady, PA. 
Controlling depth through canalized portion is 9 feet at 
normal pool level. Channel width varies from a minimum 
of 200 feet to full width of river at mouth. Existing project 
is complete, the last lock, No. 9, was placed in service in 
1938. All locks and dams are in fair condition. Navigation 
channel has been widened at certain points and, in general, 
maintained to project depth, thus affording adequate 
depth for passage of commercial tows. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a 
modern wharf for river freight. There are numerous 
privately maintained terminals and docks, consisting of 
tipples, various types of hoists, chutes, and pipelines for 
use in loading and unloading coal, stone, sand, gravel, 
petroleum products, steel products, and other commodities. 
Transshipment of freight between river and railroads 
is handled at privately owned river-to-rail 
terminals. Existing private terminals are adequate for 
shipments and receipt in Pittsburgh District of type of 
commerce now in existence. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operations & 
Maiantenance, General: During FY 95 major maintenance 
and repair contracts were continued at Lock and 
Dam 4 and begun at Lock and Dam 2 on the Allegheny 
River. The major work at Lock and Dam 4 included 
replacing deteriorated horizontal and vertical concrete 
surfaces; rehabilitation of the electrical and mechanical 
systems; replacement of antiquated lock gates and valve 
operating machineries; and installation of a tow haulage 
and retriever system. Costs for Lock 4 repairs were 
$4,582,000. Work accomplished by contract at Lock and 
Dam 2 included the installation of scour protection 
around the dam at a cost through FY 95 of $1,261,000. 
Major work accomplished by Government hired labor 
on the Allegheny River included dewatering the single 
56'x360' lock chamber at Lock and Dam 3 to repair the 
gate sill and gate machinery, and install a bubbler system 
for $870,000; installation of renovated upstream lock 
gates and renovating gate anchorages at Lock and Dam 
3 for $250,000; and dewatering the lock chamber twice 
for contracted major renovation work at Lock and Dam 4 
for $296,000. 
2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND 
DAMS, OHIO RIVER 
See this heading under Ohio River portion. 
3. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA 
AND WV 
Location. Formed by junction of Tygart and West 
Fork Rivers about 1 mile south of Fairmont, WV, and 
flows northerly for 128.7 miles to its junction with Allegheny 
River, forming Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA (See 
Geological Survey Charts for southwestern Pennsylvania 
and northern West Virginia.) 
Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 
1963, page 1070. 
Existing project. Provides for improvement of river 
by 9 locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for 
its entire length from Pittsburgh to above Fairmont, WV. 
Original locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by new 
locks and dams 7 and 8 in 1925. Increased traffic necessitated 
enlargement and improvement of locks and dams 
1 to 6 between Pittsburgh and Rices Landing, PA, by 
building two parallel chambers and fixed concrete dams 
during 1905 and 1932. Locks and dam 1 were eliminated 
in 1938 by raising Emsworth Dam, Ohio River. Reconstruction 
of lock 2 was completed in 1953 to provide two 
modern navigation chambers. The existing locks and dam 
2 were originally completed in 1907; major modifications 
were made in 1923 and 1924, and in 1926 the upper guard 
and guide walls were extended. Construction of Maxwell 
locks and dam and the reconstruction of dam 4 have 
allowed for removal of obsolete locks and dams 5 and 6. 
Small and antiquated original locks and dams 10 to 15, 
inclusive, have been replaced by three modern structures. 
Morgantown lock and dam, initial step in replacement 
program, was completed in 1950 replacing locks 
and dams 10 and 11. Hildebrand lock and dam, next 
upstream, was completed in 1959 replacing locks and 
dams 12 and 13. Raising, crest of dam 8 was also completed 
in 1959 as part of upper river improvement and 
eliminates restricted depth in upper reach of pool. Opekiska 
lock and dam was completed in 1967 replacing locks 
and dams 14 and 15. Completion of this link in upper 
river replacement program provides for entire river 
length of minimum channel depth of 9 feet, varying in 
width from a minimum of 250 feet to practically full width 
at mouth. 
Locks and dam 3 showed advanced stages of deterioration 
and, because of its strategic location and its importance 
to industry throughout the Greater Pittsburgh area 
and the nation, emergency remedial work had to be done 
in 1977. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 was 
completed on Oct. 27, 1980. 
The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized 
the replacement of Lock and Dam 7 with Grays 
Landing Lock and Dam and the construction of a new lock 
landward of the existing lock at Lock and Dam 8 (renamed 
Point Marion Lock and Dam). In accordance with 
the provisions of this act, 50% of the total cost of construction 
for the Grays Landing and Point Marion projects will 
be derived from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Construction 
of a new lock at Point Marion was completed 
and put into service in December 1993. Construction of 
a new lock at Grays Landing was completed and put into 
service in May 1993. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
18-2

PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 
Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed 
a modern wharf for freight. Boat landings are maintained 
by some municipalities along the river. A large number 
of tipples at mines and various types of hoists at manufacturing 
plants and sand and gravel supply companies 
are maintained for private use in loading and unloading 
coal, coke, billets, steel products, sand, gravel, and other 
commodities. These terminals and docks are not available 
for general commerce. A number of docks and pipelines 
are also privately maintained for petroleum and 
acid products. Marine ways are maintained by some of 
the larger industries. These are also several terminals for 
rail-to-river and river-to-rail transfer. Facilities are considered 
adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction 
of the new Grays Landing dam continued 
through FY 95 and was completed in December 1995 at 
an approximate cost of $25,000,000. Construction of the 
lock was completed in May, 1993 at a contract cost of 
approximately $80,000,000. Removal of the old fixed 
crest dam and river lock wall at Lock and Dam 7 was 
nearly completed in FY 95 at a cost of $2,800,000. Work 
continues on cultural resources andthe acquisition of real 
estate for the remainder of the project. The present 
project consists of 84 acres of fee land and 403.3 acres of 
easement. The estimated total cost of the project, which 
is scheduled to be complete in December 1997, is 
$173,960,000. 
Construction of the new lock for the Point Marion 
Project was completed in December, 1993 at a cost of 
$78,800,000. Land acquired for the project consists of 58 
acres of fee land and 77.4 acres of easement. The estimated 
total cost of the Point Marion project, which is 
scheduled to be complete in September 1996 is 
$111,700,000. 
The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 authorized 
the District to proceed with navigation improvements 
on the Lower Monongahela River. The project 
includes replacement of the fixed crest dam at Locks and 
Dam 2 with a gated dam; raising the existing pool 2 by 5 
feet, construction of twin 84' x 720' locks at Locks and 
Dam 4, and the elimination of Locks and Dam 3; lowering 
the existing pool 3 by 3.2 feet. The changes in pool 
elevations will adversely affect numerous municipallyowned 
facilities, which the Corps will adjust at project 
cost. 
The FY 95 Energy and Water Development Appropriations 
Act provided $8 million for the project. Modifications 
to the Locks 2 auxiliary chamber floodway bulkhead 
began in December 1994; this work was essentially completed 
in FY 95. Construction activity is scheduled to 
extend uninterrupted through Fiscal Year 2004. Work 
continued during FY 95 on hydraulic modeling; design 
memoranda for the new gated Dam 2, relocations, project 
dredging and disposal and riverbank stabilization in 
Pools 2 and 3, and NEPA and real estate planning activites. 
The total estimated fully funded cost of the project 
has been reduced from $750M to $645M. The $105M 
reduction consists of cost savings for innovative design 
for new Dam 2 and L/D 3 removal, reduced contingencies 
and lowered inflation forecasts. 
sion granted a license to the City of Grafton for construction 
of a non-Federal hydropower facility at this project 
18-3 
Operations and Maintenance, General: Major 
work accomplished by contract and substantially completed 
in FY 95 included painting of the dam gates at 
Point Marion Lock and Dam at a cost of $724,000; guidewall 
lighting installation at Morgantown L/D at a cost of 
$126,000; and installation of safety critical waterway 
signs at Grays Landing and Point Marion Locks and 
Dams at a cost of $580,000. A contract for the construction 
of a mooring cell at L/D 2 was completed for 
$228,700. 
Major work accomplished by hired labor in FY 95 
included dewatering the 56' x 360' lock chamber at Locks 
and Dam 2 to install renovated upstream and downstream 
lock gates, renovate sills, bubbler system and 
downstream gate machinery for $1,202,000; and dewatering 
the 84' x 720' river chamber at Maxwell Locks and 
Dam to repair the gates, anchorages, seals and cathodic 
protection, and to install a new bubbler system for 
$1,342,000. 
4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, 
OHIO RIVER 
See this heading under Ohio River portion. 
5. TYGART LAKE, WV 
Location. Tygart Lake is located on the Tygart River 
in Taylor and Barbour Counties, northcentral WV. The 
lake is approximately 26 road miles due east of 
Clarksburg, WV and 30 road miles south of Morgantown. 
The dam is situated 22.7 river miles above the mouth of 
the Tygart River at Fairmont, or 2.25 miles upstream 
from Grafton, WV, and about 78 miles south of Pittsburgh, 
PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Fairmont, 
Thornton, and Belington, WV.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for low water regulation 
and flood control. Dam is concrete gravity type with an 
uncontrolled center spillway flanked by abutment sections 
joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Public 
Works Administration January 11, 1934, and adopted 
by 1935 River and Harbor Act. For further project description 
see Annual Report for 1962. Authorized project 
is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low water control 
in Monongahela River and for purpose of flood protection 
in Monongahela and Ohio Valleys. Construction 
of dam was started in 1935 and placed in operation in 
1938. Present project lands consist of 2,662.9 acres in fee, 
flowage easements over 1,216.9 acres and 1,731.9 acres 
of other easements. 
Local cooperation. The State of West Virginia has 
assumed responsibility for the development and operation 
of hunting and fishing areas as well as the Tygart 
Lake State Park. Controlled releases for downstream 
navigation and recreation are also coordinated with others 
to the extent feasible. No local cooperation is required 
at completed project; however, future recreational developments 
are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal 
cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act 
of 1965. A cost-sharing agreement was executed with the 
West Virginia Department of Recreation in May 1981. 
Licenses. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commis

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
(FERC license 7307). Details of the design and other 
issues are still being finalized. The deadline for the start 
of project construction expired on April 15, 1995; however, 
the developer has requested an extension. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operations and 
Maintenance, General: A contract for foundation drilling 
and piezometer installation was completed during FY 95 
for $100,000. A contract for replacement of 24" and 16" 
water lines and operating valves was awarded in FY 94 
for $478,240 and was 34% complete at the end of FY 95. 
Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low 
water regulation, as required, and project structures 
were operated and maintained in a serviceable condition 
throughout the year. Estimated flood control benefits 
achieved by this reservoir for FY 95 were $2,240,00; total 
benefits through September 30, 1995, revised to reflect 
damages prevented in downstream districts as well as 
Pittsburgh District, were $586,924,000. Activities under 
reservoir management program comprising sanitation 
measures, conservation, land management, and operation 
and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 
This work was limited in scope as the State of West 
Virginia has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in 
the reservoir area. 
Tygart Dam is being evaluated as a candidate for the 
Dam Safety Program. An Evaluation Report was initiated 
in March 1994 to address spillway capacity and 
structural stability in relation to the probable maximum 
flood event. The report was submitted for review in 
March 95. Findings of the report concluded that under 
present conditions, the probable maximum flood would 
overtop the dam and cause failure. The report recommends 
protecting the dam from failure to include downstream 
erosion protection and stilling basin 
modifications. After the evaluation report is approved a 
Design Memorandum will be prepared. Estimated cost 
of the project is $29.5 million. 
6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION 
PROJECTS 
See Table 18-C on other authorized navigation projects. 
Flood Control - Local Protection 
7. CHARTIERS CREEK, PA 
Location. Within Washington and Allegheny Counties, 
southwestern Pennsylvania, a tributary of Ohio 
River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Carnegie, PA) 
Existing project. Project was authorized by Flood 
Control Act of 1965 and provides for channel widening, 
deepening and realignment, construction of a major 
channel cutoff, and relocations in two separate and independent 
reaches. James G. Fulton project in Allegheny 
County would be about 13.4 miles long and Canonsburg- 
Houston reach in Washington County about 4.7 miles 
long. Completed improvements would contain within 
banks, all floods up to the 1912 maximum of record, but 
with some residual damage, and would greatly reduce 
flood stages and damages resulting from higher floods. 
James G. Fulton Flood Control Project-Construction of 
Unit 1 was started in July 1968, completed in September 
1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and 
in May 1946 and completed in May 1949. Completed 
works, except that portion of.channel maintained by Fed- 
18-4
maintenance on June 25, 1971. Construction of Unit 2 
was started in April 1970, completed in April 1973, and 
turned over to local interests on November 22, 1974. 
Construction of Unit 3 was started in July 1971 and was 
completed in December 1974. Construction of Unit 5 was 
started in June 1972 and was completed in December 
1973. Construction of Unit 4 channel improvement was 
started in July 1978, completed in June 1981 and turned 
over to local interests on 18 November 1981. A contract 
for Environmental Improvement, Unit 4, James G. Fulton, 
was awarded in Sep 1981 and completed in Dec 1981. 
Canonsburg-Houston Reach-Construction of Unit 1 was 
started in December of 1968, completed in March 1970, 
and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance 
on August 10, 1970. Construction of Unit 2A was 
started January 17, 1976, completed December 16, 1976, 
and turned over to local interests on June 9, 1977. Construction 
plans and specifications for Unit 2B, the remaining 
unit of the reach, are 99% complete. Remaining 
work on project has been delayed due to the inability of 
local cooperating agency to provide the necessary rightsof-
way. Major flooding in Houston, PA in September, 
1990 has generated renewed interest in completion of the 
project. 
Estimated cost for new work (1985) is $41,850,000 of 
which $32,750,000 is Federal cost and $9,100,000 non- 
Federal cost. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described in 
full on page 26-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperating 
agency (Washington County) has been unable to 
provide the necessary rights-of-way for the remaining 
Unit 2B. Direct non-Federal contributions have been 
made in the amount of $4,225,188. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The 
district re-evaluated the previously designed channel 
improvement project and determined that the project, as 
originally designed, was no longer economically feasible. 
After consideration of alternative plans, the district determined 
that the erection of floodwalls around the areas 
most susceptible to damages was an economically feasible 
option. A General Reevaluation Report is being finalized 
based on this alternative and will be completed in 
November 1996. 
Regular inspections were made at completed units. 
Estimated flood control benefits achieved in FY 95 were 
$32,241,000. 
8. ELKINS, WV 
Location. On Tygart River in north-central Randolph 
County, WV, about 155 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. It 
is at downstream end of a long, broad reach of upper 
Tygart Valley, about 75 miles above mouth of river. (See 
Geological Survey Chart for Elkins, WV). 
Existing project. Provides flood protection by diverting 
flood discharges from upstream arm of loop of natural 
river channel into an artificial cutoff channel, thereby 
bypassing City of Elkins. Improvement is designed to 
accommodate discharges equivalent to maximum flood of 
reasonable expectancy. Project construction was started

PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 
eral Government, has been operated and maintained by 
City of Elkins since March 31, 1949. Present project 
lands consist of 32.04 acres in fee and 526.01 acres in 
easements. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control 
Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 
1962, page 1222. Federal cost of completed project was 
$1,772,627; estimated non-Federal cost for lands, easements, 
and rights-of-way was $40,000. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operation and 
maintenance, general: Routine investigations and inspections 
were made. Project was last inspected in September 
1992. Flood damages prevented through FY 95 
were $15,373,000. 
9. JOHNSTOWN, PA 
Location. Project is located in southwestern Cambria 
County, PA, about 58 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. It is 
in a deep and comparatively narrow valley at junction of 
Stoney Creek and Little Conemaugh River, which unite 
to form Conemaugh River. (See Geological Survey Chart 
for Johnstown, PA.) 
Existing project. Provides for increased channel capacity 
by enlarging and realigning channels and protecting 
banks with concrete pavement. Improvement 
designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to those 
of March 1936 flood, maximum natural flow of record, 
minimum of overbank flow and to practically eliminate 
damages therefrom. Project construction began in August 
1938 and was completed in November 1943. Footer 
protection for Unit 4 was completed in November 1949. 
Present project lands consist of easements over 192 acres. 
Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 
1937. For further project description see Annual Report 
for 1962, page 1215. 
Local cooperation. The rules of local cooperation for 
the rehabilitation of the existing project are governed by 
the FY 91 Energy and Water Resources Appropriations 
Act. Pursuant to this Act, the City of Johnstown will have 
a limited role in securing the needed rights of access to 
non-federal structures included in the line of protection 
and will hold and save the United States from damages 
due to construction or operation and maintenance of the 
work on the non-federal structures, except for damages 
due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its 
contractors. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operations and 
maintenance, general: The FY 1991 Energy and Water 
Resources Development Appropriations Act authorized 
and directed the Corps to undertake a major rehabilitation 
of the existing project. The Project Design Memorandum 
was approved in June 1995. The major 
rehabilitation work is to be accomplished under the Construction, 
General appropriation at an estimate cost of 
$35.5 million. Contract plans and specifications were 
initiated in July 1995 for Units 5 and 6. Award of the first 
construction contract is scheduled for June 1997. The 
project is scheduled to be physically complete in September 
2000. The work consists of the repair of 54 existing 
wall sections, slope paving and replacement of balustrade 
(safety) wall. Also included in the major rehabilitation is 
PPITAT.,S BURGH, 
DISTRICT 
Local Cooperation. Legislation requires the project 
to be cost shared at 75% Federal funds and 25% non-Fed- 
18-5
the acquisition of necessary real estate rights for construction 
and future operation and maintenance of the 
non-Federally owned walls. 
A $366,934 contract for channel maintenance at Units 
2 and 3 was completed in FY 95. Two contracts for 
channel maintenance at Units 1 and 2 ($183,884) and at 
Unit 5 ($228,428) were awarded in August 1995. 
Flood damages prevented by the project were estimated 
to be $423,220,000 through September 30, 1995. 
10. PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA 
Location. Borough of Punxsutawney is on Mahoning 
Creek in Jefferson County, PA, about 85 miles northeast 
of Pittsburgh, PA. It is on a comparatively wide, alluvial 
flood plain about 52 miles above mouth of stream and 30 
miles above Mahoning Creek flood control dam. (See 
Geological Survey Charts for Punxsutawney and 
Smicksburg, PA.) 
Existing project. Provides flood protection by channel 
enlargement, dikes, and walls. Improvement is designed 
to accommodate discharges 20% greater than that 
of maximum flood of record. Construction was accomplished 
by construction of four units. Construction 
started in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. 
Present project lands consist of perpetual easements over 
72.6 acres. Completed works, except that portion of channel 
maintained by the Federal Government have been 
operated and maintained by Borough of Punxsutawney 
since July 31, 1950. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood 
Control Act. For further project description see Annual 
Report for 1962, page 1209. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operation and 
maintenance, general: operation activities continued and 
routine investigations and inspections were made. Total 
flood damages prevented through FY 95 were 
$29,986,000. 
11. SOUTH CENTRAL, PA 
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION 
Location. Project is located at the confluence of the 
Little Conemaugh and South Fork Rivers in Cambria 
County approximately 60 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. 
Existing Project. The proposed project was authorized 
under Section 313 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992. Section 313 authorizes the Secretary 
of the Army to establish a pilot program to provide design 
and construction assistance to non-Federal interests in 
south central Pennsylvania. The Forest Hills Municipal 
Authority (FHMA) was identified by Congress as a non- 
Federal interest to receive high priority under the program. 
The Forest Hills project consists of the fast track 
planning, design and construction of a wastewater treatment 
plan, pump stations, interceptor lines and collection 
systems. The treatment system will provide service to 
four boroughs and five townships that currently are not 
serviced. Total project cost is estimated at $33,000,000 
($8,250,000 Federal cost; $24,750,000 non-Federal cost).

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
eral funds. Project Cooperation Agreements between the 
Corps of Engineers and the Forest Hills Municipal 
Authority are required prior to design and construction 
efforts. Operation and maintenance of the project will be 
at 100% non-Federal cost. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: In FY 
95 the District executed PCAs with the Forest Hills 
Municipal Authority for aerial photography and for the 
preparation of plans and specifications. The District 
continued with negotiations with the A/E selected to 
prepare the plans and specifications. The contract is 
scheduled to be awarded in December 1995. The District 
will continue to coordinate with the Forest Hills Municipal 
Authority and other Federal, state and local interests 
in executing this program. 
12. TURTLE CREEK, PA 
Location. In Allegheny and Westmoreland Counties, 
adjacent to Pittsburgh, PA, along lower reaches of Turtle 
Creek and Thompson Run, a tributary of Turtle Creek. 
(See Geological Survey Chart for Pittsburgh, PA). 
Existing project. The existing channel improvement 
project was constructed during the period 1962-1967 and 
provided for flood protection by widening, deepening, and 
streamlining channel of lower Turtle Creek for about 6.3 
miles and channel of Thompson Run for about 1 mile 
above its mouth. Appurtenant work consists of channel 
streambed and side slope protection where required, retaining 
walls, drop structures, floodgates, alteration, removal 
or reconstruction of restrictive structures and 
adjustments of affected utilities. Project was designed to 
accommodate a design flood corresponding to an estimated 
100 year frequency. Project was authorized by 
Flood Control Act of 1958. Federal cost for completed 
project was $15,350,000; non-Federal cost was 
$1,840,000. The Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriations 
Act specified that the Secretary of the Army, 
acting through the Chief of Engineers, is authorized and 
directed to repair and restore the Turtle Creek, Pennsylvania, 
local protection project. Estimated Federal cost for 
repair and restoration work is $7,050,000; non-federal 
cost is $2,350,000. 
Local Cooperation. The Turtle Creek Flood Control 
Authority was the local sponsor for the existing project. 
However, they were not financially able to sponsor the 
project restoration, nor to subsequently perform any required 
project maintenance. 
Allegheny County is the local sponsor for the project 
rehabilitation and all other requirements for local cooperation 
for the future maintenance of the project. A local 
cooperation agreement was executed with the county on 
August 4, 1992. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: The 
project consists of debris and sediment removal from the 
Turtle Creek and Thompson Run channels and debris 
basin; clearing trees and brush from channel side slopes, 
restoration of channel side slopes, repairs to concrete 
retaining walls, debris dams, trashracks, spalled concrete 
joints and drainage appurtenances; and removal of 
vegetative growth from weepholes. 
A contract for repair and restoration was awarded in 
May, 1995, for $6,699,750 and was approximately 40% 
complete at the end of FY 95. Construction is scheduled 
to be completed in August 1996. 
Total estimated flood damages prevented by the project 
through FY 95 were $84,334,000. 
Flood Control - Reservoirs 
13. BERLIN LAKE, OH 
Location. Dam is on Mahoning River about 73 miles 
above its confluence with Shenango River. It is about 10 
miles above existing Milton Reservoir Dam and 35 miles 
upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage, 
Mahoning and Stark Counties, OH. (See Geological Survey 
charts for Warren, Ravenna, and Alliance, OH.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and 
water supply. Dam consists of a partially controlled, 
concrete gravity, center spillway flanked by rolled-earthfill 
abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized 
project is complete and in operation for flood control and 
low water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning 
Valley below. Construction of dam was started in 
January 1942 and completed in June 1943. Present project 
lands consists of 6,885.3 acres in fee and 1,098.7 acres 
in easements. For further project description, see Annual 
Report for 1962, page 1233. 
Local cooperation. None required at completed project; 
however, future recreational developments are subject 
to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing 
under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operations and 
maintenance, general: A contract for $404,112 for Service 
Bridge concrete repairs was awarded and was 10% 
complete at the end of FY 95. Reservoir was operated as 
required and necessary repairs were made to structures 
and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits 
achieved in FY 95 were $2,011,000; total benefits through 
September 1995, revised to reflect damages prevented in 
downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were 
$304,895,000. Activities under reservoir management 
program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, 
land management, and operation and maintenance of 
public-use facilities continued. 
14. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA 
Location. Dam is on Conemaugh River in Indiana and 
Westmoreland Counties, PA, 7.5 miles above junction of 
Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek, which form 
the head of the Kiskiminetas River. It is about 2 miles 
northeast of Tunnelton, PA, and about 42 miles east of 
Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland and Indiana 
Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for 
Latrobe, New Florence, and Elders Ridge, PA.) 
Existing Project. A flood control reservoir dam of 
concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway 
flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides 
and an earth embankment ending in right abutment. 
Authorized project is complete. Reservoir system is designed 
for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood 
heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Present project 
lands consist of 7608.7 acres in fee and 522.8 acres in 
18-6

PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 
easements. Project authorized by Flood Control Acts of 
1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual 
Report for 1962, page 1217. 
Local cooperation. None required by law. 
Licenses. A non-Federal hydropower project utilizing 
Conemaugh Lake was constructed downstream of the 
dam under FERC Licenses 3207. The 15-megawatt project 
began commercial operation on February 6, 1989. It 
is owned by Pennsylvania Renewable Resources, Inc. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operation and 
maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit 
of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were 
made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood 
control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 95 were 
$9,000; total flood control benefits through September 
1995, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream 
districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were 
$616,352,000. Activities under reservoir management 
program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, 
land management and operation and maintenance of 
public use facilities were continued. 
15. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA 
Location. Dam is on Crooked Creek 6.7 miles above 
junction of creek with Allegheny River near Ford City, 
PA, and about 32 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. (See 
Geological Survey Charts for Freeport and Elders Ridge, 
PA.) 
Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of 
earth-fill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway 
and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. 
Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir 
system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and 
reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. 
Construction of dam was started in March 1938 and 
completed in October 1940. Present project lands consist 
of 2,561.7 acres in fee and 100.22 acres in easements. 
Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 
1938. For further project description see Annual Report 
for 1962, page 1213. 
Local cooperation. None required by law. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operations and 
maintenance, general: A contract for Phase II Roadway 
Rehabilitation was awarded for $399,591 and was essentially 
complete at the end of FY 95. Reservoir was operated 
for benefit of flood control, as required, and 
necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. 
Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this 
reservoir for FY 95 were $3,000; total benefits achieved 
through September 1995, revised to reflect damages prevented 
in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh 
District, were $138,599,000. Activities under reservoir 
management program comprising sanitation measures, 
conservation, land management, and operation and 
maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 
16. EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER 
LAKE, PA 
Location. Dam is in Elk County, PA on East Branch 
of Clarion River above Middle Fork, 7.3 miles above 
junction of East and West branches of Clarion River at 
PPIAT.T, SBURGH, 
DISTRICT 
Electric Illuminating Company on December 28, 1965, for 
the joint construction, operation and maintenance of a 
18-7 
Johnsonburg, PA, and about 105 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, 
PA. Reservoir is in Elk County, PA. (See Geological 
Survey Chart for Mount Jewett, PA.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and 
low-water regulation. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with 
gate-controlled concrete tunnel under right abutment 
and a paved uncontrolled spillway on left abutment slope. 
Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation 
for low-water regulation purposes in Clarion River Valley 
below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated 
reservoir system for protection of Pittsburgh and upper 
Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started 
in June 1947 and completed in July 1952. Present project 
lands consist of 287.2 acres in fee and 1,296.7 acres in 
easements. Project was selected for construction under 
general authorization for Ohio River Basin in Flood Control 
Acts of 1938 and 1944. For further project description 
see Annual Report for 1962, page 1206. 
Local Cooperation. None required by law. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operations and 
maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for flood 
control and low-water regulation, as required; and necessary 
repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. 
Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir 
through September 30, 1995 revised to include damages 
prevented in downstream districts as well as 
Pittsburgh District were $34,676,000. Some reservoir 
management activity was performed throughout the year 
comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land 
management and operation of public-use facilities. Work 
was limited in scope as bulk of reservoir lands are owned 
by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 
17. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY 
RESERVOIR, PA AND NY 
Location. Dam site is on Allegheny River 9 miles 
above Warren, PA, and 198 miles above mouth of river at 
Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Warren and McKean 
Counties, PA., and Cattaraugus County, NY. (See Geological 
Survey Charts for Warren and Kinzua, PA-NY, 
and Randolph and Salamanca, NY.) 
Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, 
low water regulation, and recreation. Dam consists of a 
combination concrete gravity structure and rolled earth 
embankment with gate-controlled spillway and discharge 
conduits controlled by slide-gates in gravity section. 
Construction of project, initiated in February 1960, 
is complete. Construction of dam was started in September 
1960 and completed in December 1965. Development 
of recreation area at Onoville under a cost-sharing agreement 
with Cattaragus County was completed in June 
1978. Present project lands consist of 2,646 acres in fee 
and easements over 22,420.0 acres. For further details 
see Annual Report for 1962, page 1202. Project was 
authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1941. 
Local cooperation. None required by law. 
Licenses. The Federal Power Commission granted a 
license to Pennsylvania Electric Company and Cleveland

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
325-megawatt pumped-storage installation (FPC Project 
No. 2280). The project is complete. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operations and 
maintenance, general: A contract for Boat Launching 
Improvements, Kinzua Tailwater Area, was awarded for 
$148,780. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood 
control and low water regulation, as required, and necessary 
repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. 
Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir 
through September 30, 1995, revised to include damages 
prevented in downstream districts as well as 
Pittsburgh District, were $367,995,000. Activities under 
reservoir management program comprising sanitation 
measures, conservation, land management, and operation 
and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 
18. LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA 
Location. Dam is on Loyalhanna Creek, 4.5 miles 
above junction of creek with Conemaugh River at 
Saltsburg, PA, and about 29 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. 
Reservoir is in Westmoreland County PA. (See Geological 
Survey Chart for Latrobe, PA). 
Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of 
concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway 
flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides, 
and an earth embankment section ending in left abutment. 
Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in 
operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system 
designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of 
flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction 
of dam was started in October 1939 and completed 
in June 1942. Present project lands consist of 3,330.8 
acres in fee and easements over 86.7 acres. Project was 
authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For 
further project description see Annual Report for 1962, 
page 1219. 
Local cooperation. None required by law. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operations and 
maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit 
of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs 
were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated 
flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 95 
were $$4,000; total benefits through September 1995, 
revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts 
as well as Pittsburgh District, were $179,092,000. 
Activities under reservoir management program comprising 
sanitation measures, conservation, land management 
and operation and maintenance of public-use 
facilities continued. 
19. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA 
Location. Dam is on Mahoning Creek in Armstrong 
County, PA, 22.9 miles above junction of creek with 
Allegheny River. It is about 6.50 miles southeast of New 
Bethlehem, PA, and about 51 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, 
PA. Reservoir is in Armstrong, Indiana, and Jefferson 
Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for 
Rural Valley and Smicksburg, PA). 
Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of 
concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway 
flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. 
Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation 
as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for 
protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in 
upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam 
started in February 1939 and was completed in June 
1941. Present project lands consist of 2,519.36 acres in 
fee and easements over 83.5 acres. Project was authorized 
by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further 
project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 
1210. 
Local cooperation. None required at completed project. 
On November 4, 1977 a contract for Wildlife development 
at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between 
the U.S. Government and the Pennsylvania Game Commission. 
Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of 
the first cost of initial wildlife development. Cost-sharing 
for construction of fishing access area awarded in September 
1980 was completed in July 1981 for $335,405.75. 
On June 7, 1979, a contract for fishing and boating 
development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between 
the U.S. Government and Pennsylvania Fish Commission. 
Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of 
the first costs of initial fishing and boating development. 
Each cooperation authority is responsible for operation, 
maintenance and replacement without cost to the Government 
of all facilities developed with their support. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operations and 
maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit 
of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs 
were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated 
flood damages prevented by this project for FY 95 were 
$2,000; total benefits through September 30, 1995, revised 
to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts 
as well as Pittsburgh District, were $174,458. 
Activities under reservoir management and maintenance 
for public-use facilities continued. 
20. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM 
AND RESERVOIR, OH 
Location. Dam site is on West Branch of Mahoning 
River which joins Mahoning River at Newton Falls, OH. 
It is 11 miles above mouth of branch and about 15 miles 
upstream from Warren, OH. Reservoir is in Portage 
County, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Ravenna, 
Garrettsville, Chagrin Falls, and Kent, OH.) 
Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, 
low-water regulation and recreation. Dam consists of a 
rolled-earth embankment structure with gate-controlled 
outlet works and an uncontrolled side-hill spillway 
through left abutment. Authorized project is completed 
and in operation for flood control and low water regulation 
purposes. Present project lands consist of 6,298.9 
acres fee and easements over 27.9 acres. For further 
description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1231 (West 
Branch Reservoir, Mahoning River, Ohio). Project was 
authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 191, 85th 
Cong. 1st sess.), with local contribution requirements 
modified by Flood Control Act of 1960. Federal costs of 
completed project is $17,370,000. Local interests contributed 
$3,230,000 during period of construction bringing 
initial project cost to $20,600,000. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 
$5,200,000 for water pollution abatement and for munici- 
18-8

PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 
pal and industrial water supply purposes, of which 
$3,230,000 was paid in cash during construction. Unpaid 
balance at time project is placed in operation, $1,970,000, 
will be paid in cash at that time or on an annual basis. Of 
the unpaid balance of contributed funds due and payable, 
payment in full of Trumbull County's share in the amount 
of $663,040 has been received. Mahoning County elected 
to pay their share ($1,306,960) in 50 annual installments 
of $50,323.32, including interest, and has paid 
$747,398.24 toward principal to date. Local interests 
have now contributed $4,635,453.96 towards total of 
$5,200,000 non-Federal costs. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operations and 
Maintenance, general: A contract for pavement rehabilitation, 
dam area roads, was awarded for $103,000. Reservoir 
was operated for benefit of flood control and 
low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs 
were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated 
flood control benefits achieved by this project for 
this FY 95 were $1,338,000. Total benefits for this reservoir 
through September 30, 1995 were $107,842,000. 
Activities under reservoir management program comprising 
sanitation measures, conservation, land management, 
and operation and maintenance of public-use 
facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as 
state of Ohio has jurisdiction over most of the recreation 
in reservoir area. 
21L MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH 
Location. Dam is on Mosquito Creek, 12.6 miles 
above junction of creek with Mahoning River at Niles, 
OH, and about 18 miles northwest of Youngstown, OH. 
(See Geological Survey Charts for Bristolville and Kinsman, 
OH, and Pennsylvania.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowwater 
regulation and water supply storage. Dam is 
rolled-earthfill type with outlet facilities through dam, 
and an uncontrolled natural wasteway to discharge overflow 
from reservoir. Authorized project is complete and 
in operation for flood control and low-water regulation 
purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys 
below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and 
was ready for beneficial use in January 1944. Present 
project lands consist of 11,180.4 acres in fees and easements 
over 276.0 acres. State of Ohio has a license from 
Secretary of the Army for development and operation of 
recreation facilities in reservoir area. Project was selected 
for construction under general authorization for 
Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further 
project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 
1228. 
Local cooperation. None required at completed project; 
however, future recreational developments are subject 
to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing 
under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operation and 
maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit 
of flood control and low-flow regulation as required, 
and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. 
Estimated flood control benefits achieved 
by this project for this fiscal year were $979,000. Total 
flood control benefits for this reservoir through Septem- 
PITTSBURGH, 
PA., 
DISTRICT 
Pittsburgh District, were $40,774,000. Activities under 
reservoir management program comprising sanitation 
18-9
ber 30, 1995 were $78,115,000. Activities under reservoir 
management program comprising sanitation measures, 
conservation, land management and operation and maintenance 
of certain public-use facilities continued. This 
work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction 
over most of the recreation in reservoir area. 
22. OHIO RIVER BASIN 
(PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) 
Location. A series of dikes, floodwalls, channel improvements, 
and reservoirs/lakes in Ohio River Basin 
within Pittsburgh District. 
Existing project. Individual projects considered in 
comprehensive plan within Pittsburgh District. (See Tables 
18-B, 18-E and 18-K on Acts authorizing existing 
projects, local protection projects and reservoirs.) 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: None by 
the United States except as stated in individual projects. 
Completed local protection projects operated and maintained 
by local interests, including those projects for 
which individual reports have been included, prevented 
flood damages of an estimated $264,000 during this fiscal 
year. Total flood damages prevented through September 
30, 1995 were $791,630,000. 
23. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, 
PA AND OH 
Location. Dam is on Shenango River about 0.8 mile 
above Sharpsville, PA, and about 33 miles above junction 
of river with Mahoning River, which unite near New 
Castle, PA, to form Beaver River. Reservoir is in Mercer 
County, PA and Trumbull County, Ohio. (See Geological 
Survey Chart for Kinsman, Ohio, and Shenango, PA.) 
Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowflow 
augmentation and recreation. Dam consists of a 
concrete gravity structure with gate-controlled outlet 
works and an uncontrolled center spillway section. 
Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation 
for low-water regulation purposes in Shenango River 
valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated 
reservoir system for protection o1 Shenango River 
valley and the Beaver and upper Ohio River Valley, 
generally. Construction of dam was started in March 
1963 and completed in May 1965. Present project lands 
consists of 14,420 acres in fee and easements over 198 
acres. Future work consists of completion of project lands 
of any additional recreation facilities as required to serve 
the public needs. For further project description, see 
Annual Report for 1962, page 1230. Project was authorized 
by 1938 Flood Control Act. 
Local cooperation. None required by law. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operations and 
maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit 
of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, 
and necessary repairs were made to structures 
and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits 
achieved through September 30, 1995, revised to reflect 
damages prevented in downstream districts as well as

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
measures, conservation, land management and operation 
and maintenance continued. 
24. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV 
Location. In Lewis County, North Central West Virginia, 
on the West Fork River, which joins the Tygart 
River at Fairmont, West Virginia to form the Monongahela 
River. Damsite is located at Brownsville, West Virginia, 
about 4 miles south of Weston and 72 miles above 
mouth of West Fork River at Fairmont, WV. (See Geological 
Survey Charts for Weston and Crawford, WV.) 
Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir 
for flood control, water supply, water quality control, 
area redevelopment and recreation. Dam is concrete 
gravity type, 95 feet high and 620 feet long. Outlet works 
consist of five multi-level sluices, spillway is uncontrolled. 
Storage capacity is 74,650 acre-feet controlling an 
area of 102 square miles. Project was authorized by 1966 
Flood Control Act. Estimated initial Federal cost for new 
work (1991) is $231,000,000 (includes an estimated 
$24,900,000 reimbursement by non-Federal interests.) 
Present project lands consist of 20,451 acres in fee and 
easements over 398 acres. 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required to 
make arrangements for repayment, under the provisions 
of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, of that part 
of the construction cost and annual operation, maintenance 
and replacement costs allocated to municipal and 
industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated 
at $4,350,000 for construction; and $15,000 annually for 
operations, maintenance and replacements. Also, in accordance 
with Federal Water Project Recreation Act, 
local interests are required to administer project land and 
water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, 
pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be 
through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable 
first costs of the reservoir project allocated to recreation 
and fish and wildlife enhancement, an amount presently 
estimated at $24,810,000, bear all costs of operation, 
maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and 
wildlife land and facilities, the amount involved being 
currently estimated on an average annual basis to be 
$457,000, exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, 
control against removal of streamflow made available 
for water quality control; and contribute to the control of 
pollution of streams subject to low-flow augmentation by 
adequate treatment or other methods of controlling 
wastes at their source. The requirements of Section 221 
were amended in 1971 to exempt assurances for future 
demands for water supply pursuant to the Water Supply 
Act of 1958 from the contractual requirements of the Act. 
Accordingly, the city of Weston, West Virginia, has provided 
assurances that it will enter into a water supply 
contract with the Department of the Army within a period 
of time which will permit paying out the costs allocated 
to the water supply storage within the life of the project. 
A recreation cost-sharing contract, in accordance with 
the requirements of the Federal Water Project Recreation 
Act, P.L. 89-72, was executed by the State of West Virginia 
on March 27, 1977. Local cooperation assurances 
for recreation cost-sharing were executed by the Governor 
and Attorney General of West Virginia on May 29, 
1973. In this connection, Section 8 of P.L. 92-222 deleted 
the requirement that the State of West Virginia "hold and 
save the United States free from damages resulting from 
water rights claims due to construction and operation of 
the project." Legislation relieving Stonewall Jackson 
Lake, WV, project of the requirements of Section 221, P.L. 
96-611 was contained in Water Resources Development 
Act of 1974 signed by the President on March 7, 1974. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The 
Corps is working with the State of WV to revise the 
Master Plan to incorporate higher revenue producing 
recreation facilities, including a lodge, golf course, cabins 
and camping. The revised Master Plan was approved by 
the Corps in June 1992, but with the stipulation that a 
cost-sharing contract amendment must be executed prior 
to the award of a construction contract for the granting 
of any cost-sharing credits. The FY 1992 Energy and 
Water Development Appropriations Act allows the State 
cost-sharing credits for all of these facilities except the 
golf course. In March, 1994, the State and the Assistant 
Secretary of the Army for Civil Works ASA(CW) executed 
an amendment to the 1977 Stonewall Jackson Lake Recreation 
Cost-Sharing Contract to reflect these credits. 
The State of West Virginia now must design and build 
the approved remaining recreation facilities within ten 
years of the executed amendment, or March 2004, in 
accordance with the timeframes and conditions set forth 
in the amended contract. The WV State Supreme Court 
has ruled that the sale of $6 million in revenue bonds for 
the design and construction of the lodge, additional camping 
and golf course may not proceed. 
During FY 95 a station hydropower plant was installed 
in the dam structure and was placed into service. The 
plant supplies power to the dam and administration 
building with the excess power being sold to an electric 
utility company. 
Estimated flood control benefits achieved for this project 
for FY 95 were $1,348,000; total flood control benefits 
through September 30, 1995, revised to include downstream 
districts, were $51,077,000. 
25. TIONESTA LAKE, PA 
Location. Dam is on Tionesta Creek, 1.25 miles above 
junction of creek with Allegheny River at Tionesta, PA, 
and about 78 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir 
is entirely in Forest County, PA. (See Geological 
Survey Charts for Tionesta, Tidioute and Sheffield, PA.) 
Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of 
earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway 
and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. 
Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir 
system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and 
reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. 
Construction of dam was started in May 1938 and completed 
in January 1941. Present project lands consist of 
2,797.3 acres in fee and easements over 13.1 acres. Future 
work consists of provision on project lands of additional 
recreational facilities as required to serve public 
needs. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 
1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual 
Report for 1962, page 1203. 
18-10

PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 
Local cooperation. None required by law. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operation and 
maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit 
of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, 
and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. 
Estimated flood control benefits achieved 
by this project through September 30, 1995, revised to 
include downstream districts, were $184,460,000. Activities 
under reservoir management program comprising 
sanitation measures, conservation, land management 
and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities 
continued. 
26. UNION CITY DAM, PA 
Location. In Erie County, northwestern Pennsylvania, 
on French Creek, a tributary of Allegheny River. 
Damsite is 24 miles upstream from Cambridge Springs, 
PA, and 41 miles upstream from Meadville, PA. (See 
Geological Survey Chart for Union City, PA - NY.) 
Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of 
earth embankment non-gated type with uncontrolled 
side-channel spillway. Outlet works consist of a lower 
outlet located in valley floor constructed of reinforced 
concrete conduit 8 feet by 4.5 feet and an upper outlet 
consisting of an uncontrolled slot 9.5 feet wide through 
the north end of the ogee weir in the spillway. Dam is 
1,420 feet long at top rising 88 feet above streambed and 
provides gross capacity of 47,640 acre-feet from a drainage 
area of 222 square miles. Project authorization was 
modified to provide for a conservation pool and addition 
of recreation facilities. On November 5, 1974, a referendum 
proposal was defeated by the constituents of Erie 
County in regard to the cost-sharing for construction of 
recreation facilities. In view of the foregoing, all action 
toward implementation of the authorized project modification 
was discontinued. Reservoir is operated as one of 
a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in 
French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny 
River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, 
and upper Ohio River Valley. Initial highway 
relocations were completed in October 1968 and remaining 
highway relocations were completed in May 1972. 
Construction of the dam was started in July 1968 and 
completed in September 1971. Present project lands consist 
of 161.4 acres in fee and easements over 2,410.29 
acres. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood 
Control Act. 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required to 
inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least 
annually, that the system of reservoirs of which Union 
City Dam is a part, will not provide protection against 
maximum floods. On November 10, 1964 the Department 
of Forests and Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 
furnished formal assurances of local cooperation in 
respect to notifying local interests at least annually that 
the system of reservoirs will not provide protection 
against maximum floods. A referendum on the ballot 
during the November 1974 election regarding the approval 
to cost-share the maintenance of a summer pool 
was defeated by the local voters. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operation and 
maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and 
appurtenances was performed as required. This dam 
acted as an uncontrolled detention type dam during the 
fiscal year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for 
this project for FY 95 were $43,000. Total flood control 
benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1995, 
revised to include downstream districts, were 
$22,793,000. 
27. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA 
Location. In Crawford County, northwestern Pennsylvania, 
on Woodcock Creek, a tributary of French 
Creek. Damsite is about 4.1 miles above mouth of Woodcock 
Creek and about 5 miles northeast of Meadville, PA. 
(See Geological Survey Chart for Meadville, PA.) 
Existing project. A flood-control reservoir dam of 
rolled-earth embankment type, gate-controlled outlet 
works with a 6 foot-wide by 7.75 foot-high conduit and 
uncontrolled saddle spillway on the left abutment. Dam 
is 4,650 feet long at top rising 90 feet above streambed 
and provides for gross capacity of 20,000 acre-feet from a 
drainage area of 46 square miles. Reservoir is operated 
as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood 
stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and 
mouth. Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, 
PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. 
Authorized project is complete. Construction of dam was 
started in July 1970 and completed in July 1973. Land 
acquired for project consists of 1,731.5 acres in fee and 
easements over .56 acres. Project was authorized for flood 
control and recreation by 1962 Flood Control Act. Storage 
for water quality control was added to the project during 
the preconstruction planning stage. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must inforntari 
fected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, 
in a manner satisfactory to District Engineer, that a 
system of reservoirs of which Woodcock Creek is a part, 
will not provide protection against maximum floods. 
Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters assumed 
responsibility of local cooperation for project. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operation and 
maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and 
appurtenances was performed as required. Estimated 
flood control benefits achieved by this project for FY 94 
were $7,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this 
reservoir through September 30, 1995, revised to include 
downstream districts, were $4,065,000. Activities under 
reservoir management program comprising sanitation 
measures, conservation, land management and operation 
and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 
28. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, 
PA AND MD 
Location. Dam is on Youghiogheny River about 74.2 
miles above its junction with Monongahela River at 
McKeesport, PA. It is 1.2 miles upstream from Confluence, 
PA, and about 57 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, PA. 
Reservoir is in Fayette and Somerset Counties, PA, and 
Garrett County, MD. (See Geological Survey Charts for 
Confluence, PA, Accident, MD, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.) 
18-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Existing project. Reservoir for flood control, low-flow 
augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. Dam 
is rolled-earthfill type with separate uncontrolled side 
channel spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized 
project is complete. For flood control, reservoir is operated 
as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed 
for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights 
in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was 
started in June 1940 and completed in May 1944. Present 
project lands consist of 3,914.9 acres in fee and easements 
over 0.62 acre. A license was issued to the Commonwealth 
of Pennsylvania covering fish conservation and 
management in Pennsylvania portion of reservoir. Future 
work consists of provision on project lands of additional 
recreational and sanitary facilities as required to 
serve the public needs. 
Project was selected for construction under general 
authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control 
Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 
1962, page 1223. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Licenses. A non-Federal hydropower project utilizing 
releases from Youghiogheny River Lake was constructed 
in accordance with FERC License 3623. D/R 
Hydro Company is the authorized representative of the 
Licensee, Youghiogheny Hydroelectric Authority, and is 
responsible for operation of the plant. It has a 10-megawatt 
capacity. The plant began commercial operation on 
December 7, 1989. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operations and 
maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit 
of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were 
made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood 
control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period 
were $129,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by 
this project through September 30, 1995 revised to include 
damages prevented in downstream districts, were 
$176,306,000. Activities under reservoir management 
program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, 
land management and operation and maintenance of 
public use facilities continued. 
29. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent 
acts require local interests to furnish assurances that 
they will maintain and operate certain local protection 
projects after completion in accordance with regulations 
prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers 
are responsible for administration of these regulations 
within boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections 
were made of completed units transferred to local 
interests for maintenance and operation and local interests 
were advised, as necessary, of measures required to 
maintain these projects in accordance with standards 
prescribed by regulations. (See Table 18-L for dates of 
inspections.) 
Costs for this fiscal year, $101,020. Total cost to September 
30, 1995 was $1,696,653. 
Corps Statutory Authorities 
Activities in Support of Others 
Facilities 
Inspections 
Total Cost for Fiscal Year: 
General Investigations 
32. SURVEYS 
Navigation Studies 
Flood Control Studies 
Special Studies 
Comprehensive Studies 
Special Investigations 
Federal Regulatory Commission 
Dam Safety Criteria Study 
Coordination Studies with Other Agencies 
Total cost for fiscal year 
33. COLLECTION AND STUDY 
OF BASIC DATA 
Costs this fiscal year were $204,030 for flood plain 
management services and $8,134 for related hydrologic 
studies. 
34. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 
AND DESIGN 
Locks and Dams 2, 3 and 4, 
Monongahela River 
Chartiers Creek, PA 
Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, PA 
Total cost for fiscal year 
35. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 
None. 
36. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR 
IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT 
Kinzua Cr., Subimpoundment 
Tyart River Lake Wetland 
Coordination Acct Funds 
Initial Appraisals, General 
Total Cost this FY 
18-12 
$185,025 
58,071 
15,859 
70,344 
$329,300 
$608,311 
1,088,093 
101,101 
93,180 
106,557 
11,250 
44,265 
72,413 
$2,125,170 
$3,760,388 
103,649 
225,736 
$4,089,773 
$9,436 
2,622 
1,526 
15,998 
$29,582 
30. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
See Table 18-E on other authorized flood control projects. 
31 FLOOD CONTROL WORKS 
UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
For flood control activities pursuant to Section 
205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended 
(preauthorization) 
See Table 18-M. 
For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 
Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) 
See Table 18-M. 
Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public 
Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.)

PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 
TABLE 18-A ( 
See 
Section 
In Text Project 
Navigation- Locks and Dams 
1. Allegheny River 
PA 
3. Monongahela 
River, A and 
WV 
5. T~art Lake, 
Flood Control - Local Protection 
7. Chartiers 
Creek, PA 
8. Elkins, WV 
9. Johnstown, PA 
10. Punxsutawney, 
Ohio River 
Basin, PA 
11. South Central, PA 
Environmental Restoration 
12. Turtle Creek, 
PA 
Flood Control - Reservoirs 
13. Berlin Lake 
Ohio River 
Basin, OH 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
Total Cost to 
Sept. 30, 
Funding FY 92 FY93 FY94 FY95 1995 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. (O&M) 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. (O&M) 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
7,902,900 
7,982,512 
72,408,000 
72,331,548 
12,298,200 
12,195,303 
784,100 
777,643 
60,000 
19,820 
10,329 
4,800 
944 
780,800 
741,749 
552,000 
925,729 
209,800 
203,412 
212,000 
214,121 
9,309,000 
9,036,321 
33,709,000 
32,918,449 
13,025,000 
12,935,281 
11,254,000 
10,928,523 
40,134,000 
26,408,403 
16,228,700 
15,815,627 
- - 
866,000 1,564,000 
827,514 1,133,769 
- 29,000 
39,695 28,055 
15,000 
30,549 - 
72,000 21,000 
22,907 35,376 
304,000 
126,330 
1,130,000 
1,141,007 
144,000 
347,023 
1,200,000 
1,135,923 
32,000 22,000 
23,858 22,551 
- 5,000,000 
- 248,197 
347,000 925,000 
149,901 184,867 
- 18,157,8601 
- 18,157,860 
13,119,000 135,664,5232 
13,643,805 135,562,314 
19,107,000 407,232,5353 
27,833,368 404,782,163 
12,502,000 258,471,2576 
12,855,234 258,189,675 
- 15,857,000 
- 15,857,000 
- 19,077,9327 
- 19,077,932 
918,000 16,690,4518 
1,303,153 16,596,716 
- 89,000 
1,146 88,716 
- 30,818,1534i 
27 30,818,153 
7,c 
31, 
477,( 
438, 
1,070,( 
994, 
200,( 
67,' 
3,585,( 
442,] 
2,331,( 
622,E
- 1,772,627 
- 1,772,627 
000 369,192 
971 355,540 
- 8,865,388 9 
- 8,865,388 
000 6,365,190 
477 6,312,518 
000 4,852,000 
725 4,694,900 
- 3,586,107 10 
- 3,586,107 10 
000 1,566,59711 
494 1,419,99711 
000 8,585,000 42 
182 690,379 
000 20,129,35238 
426 17,482,808 
- - - 8,739,98712 
- - - 8,739,987 
1,829,500 1,704,000 1,693,800 1,834,000 29,322,9153 
1,734,360 1,671,501 1,796,224 1,641,919 29,089,94713 
18-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TARTBLE 18-A 
See 
Section 
In Text Project 
14. Conemaugh 
River Lake, Ohio 
River Basin, PA 
15. Crooked Creek 
Lake, Ohio 
River Basin, PA 
16. East Branch, 
Clarion River 
Lake, Ohio 
River Basin, PA 
17. Kinzua Dam and 
Allegheny 
Reservoir, Ohio 
River Basin, PA 
S and NY 
18. Loyalhanna 
Lake, Ohio River 
Basin, PA 
19. Mahoning Creek 
Lake, Ohio 
River Basin, PA 
20. Michael J. Kirwan 
Dam and 
Reservoir, Ohio 
River Basin, OH 
21. Mosquito Creek 
Lake, Ohio River 
.Basin, OH 
22. Ohio River Basin 
Pittsburgh, PA 
District Consolidated 
23. Shenango River 
Lake, Ohio River 
Basin, PA 
24. Stonewall Jackson 
Lake, Ohio 
River Basin, WV 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Minor Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
FY 92 FY 93 FY94 FY95 
Total Cost to 
Sept. 30, 
1995 
- - - 46,012,41114 
- - - 46,012,41114 
1,147,700 1,027,000 1,044,800 1,155,000 16,402,97639 
1,144,476 1,003,805 1,059,766 1,154,657 16,380,4949 
Funding 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
- 4,482,93315 
- 4,482,93315 
1,783,000 26,990,55816 
1,362,632 26,945,49316 
9,539,58617 
- 9,539,586 
908,000 15,290,98418 
897,943 15,251,19418 
- - - 109,305,07619 
- - - 109,305,07619 
1,495,000 1,505,800 1,531,000 26,348,943 39 
1,489,521 1,476,699 1,407,143 26,167,2619 
- - - 2,921,000 
- - - 2,921,000 
- - - 5,727,53120 
- - - 5,727,53120 
1,041,700 1,017,000 1,039,900 1,098,000 19,273,29321 
1,031,255 974,357 1,078,660 1,087,599 19,238,284 
782,000 
775,977 
- - - 7,144,97322 
- - - 7,144,973 
845,000 933,000 833,000 14,419,962 40 
774,938 974,295 850,031 14,400,4504 
- - - 47,033 
- - - 47,033 
- - - 17,376,097 24 
745,700 842,000 1,013,000 803,000 13,759,23425 
756,177 802,743 880,297 932,871 13,702,065 25 
-- - - 4,253,02926 
- .- 4,253,0226 - 4,253,029 
1,121,400 1,076,000 1,119,000 
985,943 1,034,842 1,268,968 
-10,000 
1,662 
2,163,300 
1,999,087 
14,000 
432,797 
909,900 
882,370 
785,000 14,602,571 
778,965 14,564,782 
- 985,19727 
- 985,197 2 
- 40,217,20128 
- 40,217,20128 
2,432,000 
2,450,107 
285,000 
409,050 
845,000 
828,077 
2,295,700 
2,320,923 
1,486,000 
1,125,981 
858,000 
886,640 
2,191,000 
2,194,229 
122,800 
185,468 
35,221,34729 
35,065,178 
29 
211,063,434 
210,328,653 
877,000 6,469,813 
883,849 6,458,348 
18-14 
... ... .r 1,. i i+i i 
- 
10,184 
1,621,400 
1,597,259 
860,900 
854,531 
-4,000 
686 
1,384,500 
1,397,443 
- -- 
1,341,000 1,367,800 
1,359,677 1,361,958 
978,000 898,700 
965,265 914,340

PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 
TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) 
See Total Cost to 
Section Sept. 30, 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY94 FY95 1995 
25. Tionesta Lake, New Work 
Ohio River Approp. - - - - 7792,3783 
Basin, PA Cost - - - - 7,792,37831 
Maint. 
Approp. 1,106,900 1,152,000 1,623,100 1,708,000 22,568,02832 
Cost 1,137,445 1,118,850 1,551,553 1,776,999 22,523,89232 
26. Union City New Work 
Dam, Ohio Approp. - - - - 14,559,800 
River Basin, PA Cost - - - - 14,559,800 
Maint. 
Approp. 260,000 236,000 331,000 382,000 5,622,668 
Cost 254,276 227,969 303,173 354,424 5,550,796 
27. Woodcock Creek New Work33 
Lake, Ohio Approp. -8,409 - - - 20,545,065 
River Basin, PA Cost - - - - 20,545,065 
Maint. 
Approp. 655,100 776,000 903,000 911,000 11,877,157 3 5 
Cost 647,790 757,015 903,892 826,851 11,762,609 
28. Youghiogheny New Work3 
River Lake Approp. - - - - 12,521,16736 
Ohio River Cost - - - - 12,521,16736 
Basin, PA and Maint.37 
MD Approp. 1,696,700 1,902,000 1,879,000 1,691,000 31,956,16337 
Cost 1,671,995 1,838,446 1,944,786 1,690,894 31,911,422 3 
1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and 
$1,250,049 from public works funds. 
2. Includes $64,365 public works acceleration, executive 
funds (1963) and $191,400 provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes 
$995,000 appropriated and expended for major 
maintenance at L/D's 2, 3 and 4. 
3. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects; 
$111,064,400 appropriated to date for Point Marion, LID 8, PA 
($55,389,400 - CG funds, $55,675,000 from the Inland Waterways 
Trust Fund); $166,585,600 appropriated to date for 
Gray's Landing, L/D 7, PA ($84,803,600- CG funds, $81,782,000 
from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund); and $$3,491,000 appropriated 
to date for LID 2, 3 and 4, Monongahela River, from 
the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Also includes AE & D costs 
for Gray's Landing ($803,000) and Point Marion ($618,758). 
4. Includes $109,552,616 expended to date on new lock at 
Point Marion LID, PA ($54,707,533 - CG funds, $54,845,083 
from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund); $166,026,462 expended 
to date for Gray's Landing, LID 7, PA ($82,755,079 - CG 
funds, $83,271,383 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund) 
and $3,111,550 expended to date on L/D 2, 3 and 4, Monongahela 
River, from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Also includes 
AE & D costs for Gray's Landing ($803,000) and Point 
Marion ($618,758). 
5. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive 
funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and 
$582,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations 
Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 
6. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive 
funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and 
$464,508 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations 
Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 
7. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 
public work funds, $234,000 Code 711 funds and $412,088 Code 
713 funds; excludes $409,622 contributed by local interest. 
8. Includes $89,000 provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriations, Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes 
$427,000 appropriated to and $383,691 expended on the Dam 
Safety Assurance Program. 
9. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. 
10. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from contributed 
funds. 
11. Includes $283,988 provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 
12. Includes $1,542,500 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 
funds and $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed 
by local interest. 
13. Includes $40,000 provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriations Act (PL 98-8 1983 funds. Includes 
$102,600 appropriated to and expended from M&O of dams in 
FY 95 and $695,728 expended to date on M&O of dams. 
14. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and 
$328,000 Code 711 funds. 
15. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds. Also 
includes $278,044 Code 711 funds. 
16. Includes $45,000 provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Includes 
$102,600 appropriated to and expended from M&O of dams in 
FY 95 and $695,728 expended to date on M&O of dams. 
17. Includes $156,812 Code 711 funds. 
18. Includes $322,000 provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 
19. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 
Code 711 funds and $568,265 Code 713 funds; excludes 
$389,370 contributed by local interest. 
20. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and 
$274,669 Code 711 funds. 
21. Includes $256,000 provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes 
$102,600 appropriated to and expended on M&O of 
dams. 
22. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 
711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $500,086 
contributed by local interests. 
18-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) 
23. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 
711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $456,611 
contributed by local interests. 
24. Includes $74,900 Code 711 funds; excludes 
$4,585,627.29 for new work contributed by local interest. 
25. Includes $315,500 provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 
26. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 
funds. 
27. Includes $8,914 from emergency relief funds. 
28. Includes $1,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 
Code 713 funds. 
29. Includes $152,000 provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 
30. Includes $2,303,076 Code 711 funds ($256,760 provided 
from the Productive Employment Appropriations ActPL 98-8, 
1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency 
relief funds. 
31. Includes $2,303,077 Code 711 funds, ($256,531 provided 
from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 
1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency 
relief funds. 
32. Includes $203,000 provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 
33. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 
34. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 
35. Includes $85,000 provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 
36. Includes $2,846,263 Code 711 funds ($293,000 provided 
from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 
1983 funds). 
37. Includes $591,000 provided from the Productive Employment 
Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 
38. Includes $1,840,000 (non-Federal) original construction 
cost and an additional $2,300,000 (non-Federal) contributed 
and $400,214 (non-Federal) expended in FY 95. 
39. Includes $102,600 appropriated to and expended from 
M&O of dams in FY 95, and $695,728 expended to date on M&O 
of dams. 
40. Includes $102,600 appropriated to and expended from 
M&O of dams in FY 95. 
41. Includes $4,219,967 (non-Federal funds) contributed 
and expended to date. 
42. Includes $85,000 (non-Federal) contributed funds in 
FY 95. 
18-16

PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 
TABLE 18-B 
See Dal 
Section Author 
in Text Ac 
AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION 
te 
rizing 
t Project and Work Authorized 
Aug 5, 1886 
June 3, 1896 
July 25, 1912 
July 3, 1930 
Aug 30, 19351 
Aug 30, 19351 
June 26, 19342 
3. 
Mar 3, 1899 
June 13, 1902 
Mar 3, 1905 
Mar 3, 1905 
Mar 2, 1907 
Mar 4, 1913 
Sep 22, 1922 
July 3, 1930 
Jan 31, 19313 
June 26, 19342 
ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (See Section 1 of Text) 
For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sep 29, 1891 
Secretary of War authorized change to a moveable dam.) 
For locks and dams 2 and 3. 
For locks and dams 4 to 8 inclusive. 
For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. 
Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 
200 feet wide up to lock 2, and construct new locks and 
dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. 
Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging 
a navigable channel to head of pool 8. 
Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds 
from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. 
MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV 
Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 
3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; 
all at an estimated cost of $185,556. 
Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate 
increased in 1910 to $698,961.) 
Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at 
a cost of $7,850. 
Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. 
Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. 
Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. 
(Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) 
Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: 
Guide walls and guard walls, 1 to 6, $1,255,130; 
Lengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; 
New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; 
Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; 
Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; 
Lock and dam 8 (second chamber), $504,465; 
Reconstruction dam 4, $397,211; Marine ways, repair 
plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total 
of $6,640,439. 
Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing structure, 
at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work authorized 
at old lock and dam 4. 
Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 
above existing structure and on such site as they may deem 
most desirable. 
Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds 
from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. 
Annual Report 1886, 
p.1545, 
nnual Report 1891, 
p. 2366 
H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 
1st Sess., and Annual 
Report 1896, p. 2212 
H. Doc. 540, 62d Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong., 
2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee, Doc. 16, 
72d Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 
3d Sess., and Rivers and 
Harbors Committee, Doc. 
27,73d Cong., 2d Sess. 
Annual Report 1897, 
p. 2423 
Annual Report 1909, 
p. 1756 
Annual Report 1904, 
p. 460 
H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 1217, 62d Cong., 
3d Sess. 
H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee, Doc. 22, 
70th Cong., 2d Sess. 
18-17 
Documents

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
May 17, 1950 
Nov 17, 1986 
Oct 31, 1992 
PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA 
For construction of local flood protection projects. 
Modification of existing project as follows: 
Provide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock 
and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15 inclusive. 
Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing 
pool-full elevation 4 feet. 
Provide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom 
width and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. 
Provide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela 
River, into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a 
maximum bottom width of 200 feet and a 9-foot project 
depth. 
Construct new lock and dam 7 (Grays Landing Lock and Dam) 
as follows: 
The Grays Landing Lock and Dam will be located 3.0 miles 
downriver from existing Lock and Dam 7. It will consist of a 
single lock chamber, 84 feet wide by 720 feet long, with a 
fixed crest dam 576 feet in length. The existing Maxwell 
Pool at elevation 763.0 will be shortened three miles and 
the existing Pool 7 at elevation 778.0 will be extended downriver 
to the new dam. There will be no change in pool elevation 
above existing Dam 7. Upon completion of the new 
replacement lock and dam, existing Lock and Dam 7 will be 
removed. Total authorized cost is $123,000,000. 
Replace existing 56'x360' lock chamber at Point Marion Lock 
and Dam (Lock and Dam 8) with new 84'x720' chamber. Existing 
movable crest dam to remain; no change in pool elevations. 
Total authorized cost is $82,900,000. 
Navigation improvements as follows: The project replaces the 
fixed crest dam at Locks and Dam 2 with a gated dam; 
raises the existing pool 2 by 5', constructs twin 84'x720' 
locks at Locks and Dam 4, and eliminates Locks and Dam 3; 
lowering the existing pool 3 by 3.2 feet. Authorized cost is 
$556,400,000. Cost of construction is to be paid equally from 
the general fund of the Treasury and the Inland Waterways 
Trust Fund. 
TYGART RIVER LAKE, WV 
Construction of a dam and reservoir for low water regulation 
and flood control 
ELKINS, WV 
For construction of local flood protection projects. 
JOHNSTOWN, PA 
For construction of local flood protection projects. 
18-18 
S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong., 
1st Sess. 3. 
Supplemental Appropriations 
Act of 1985 for Engineering 
and Design 
and Land Acquisition 
and Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986; 
Public Law 99-662 Sec. 
301(a). 
Supplemental Appropriations 
Act of 1985 for Engineering 
and Design 
and Land Acquisition 
and Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986; 
Public Law 99-662 Sec. 
301(a). 
Water Resources 
Development Act of 
1992; PL 102-580 Sec 101 
H. Doc. 1792, 64th Cong. 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 106, 76th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th 
Cong. 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st 
Sess. 
FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th 
Cong. 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th 
Cong. 1st Sess. 
5. 
8. 
Jan 11, 1934 
Aug 30, 1935 
Jun 28, 1938 
9. 
Jun 28, 1938 
10. 
Jun 28, 1938 
--

PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 
TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
14. 
13. 
Jun 28, 1938 
Dec 22, 1944 
as amended 
Jun 22, 1936 
amended by 
Jun 28, 1938 
Dec 22, 1944 
as amended 
Jun 22, 1936 
amended by 
Jun 28, 1938 
Dec 22, 1944 
as amended 
Jun 28, 1938 
Dec 22, 1944 
as amended 
Jun 22, 1936 
amended by 
Jun 28, 1938 
modified by 
Aug 18, 1941 
Dec 22, 1944 
as amended 
Jun 22, 1936 
amended by 
Jun 28, 1938 
Dec 22, 1944 
as amended 
Jun 22, 1936 
amended by 
Jun 28, 1938 
Dec 22, 1944 
as amended 
18-19 
BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH 
Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low 
water regulation. 
Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. 
CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA 
Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. 
Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. 
CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA 
Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. 
Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. 
EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, 
OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA 
Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low 
water regulation. 
Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. 
KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, 
OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY 
Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low 
water regulation and recreation. 
Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, pollution 
abatement, low water regulation and recreation. 
Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. 
LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA 
Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. 
Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. 
MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA 
Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. 
Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. 
H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th 
Cong. 1st Sess. 
Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 
1944 
H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th 
Cong. 1st Sess. 
Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 
1944 
H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th 
Cong. 1st Sess. 
Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 
1944. 
H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th 
Cong. 1st Sess. 
Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 
1944 
H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 
1st Sess 
FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th 
Cong. 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 
1944 
H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th 
Cong. 1st Sess. 
Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 
1944 
H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th 
Cong. 1st Sess. 
Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 
1944 
15. 
16. 
17. 
18. 
19.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
21 
20. 
Jul 3, 1958 
Jul 14, 1960 
Jun 28, 1938 
Dec 22, 1944 
as amended 
Aug 28, 1937 
Jun 28, 1938 
Aug 18, 1941 
Dec 22, 1944 
Jul 24, 1946 
May 17, 1950 
Dec 30, 1963 
Jun 18, 1965 
May 12, 1967 
Aug 13, 1968 
Jun 19, 1970 
Mar 7, 1974 
Oct 22, 1976 
18-20 
MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH 
Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water 
supply, low water regulation and recreation. 
To define cost-sharing arrangement for municipal & industrial 
water supply & water for pollution abatement purposes. 
MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH 
Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low 
water regulation and water supply storage. 
Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. 
OHIO RIVER BASIN - Pittsburgh District 
Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection 
of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to 
be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary 
of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. 
Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and 
other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in 
discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and 
for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized 
$75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local 
flood protection works. 
Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan 
for Ohio River Basin. 
Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive 
plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects 
in tributary basins. 
Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive 
plan including additional projects in tributary basins. 
Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan 
for Ohio River Basin. 
Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive 
plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River 
Basin. 
Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive 
plan for Ohio River Basin. 
Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive 
plan for Ohio River Basin. 
Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive 
plan for Ohio River Basin. 
Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive 
plan for Ohio River Basin. 
Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive 
plan for Ohio River Basin. 
Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering 
and design of the project for abatement of acid 
mine drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. 
H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
Pub. Law 86-645 
H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th 
Cong. 1st Sess. 
Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 
1944 
Flood Control Committee, 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Flood Control Committee, 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong. 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
S. Doc. 20, 81st Cong. 
1st Sess. 
Public Law 88-253, 
88th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 
90th Cong. 1st Sess. 
Public Law 90-17. 
90th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Public Law 90-483, 
90th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong. 
River Basin Monetary 
Authorization Act of 
1974. 
Water Resources Development 
Act of 1976; Public 
Law 94-587, Sec. 101(a). 
22.

PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 
TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
23. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA 
AND OH 
Jun 28, 1938 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 
water regulation and recreation. 1st Sess. 
FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th 
Cong. 1st Sess. 
Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 
as amended 1944 
24. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV 
Nov 7, 1966 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water S. Doc. 109, 89th Cong. 
supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and rec- 2nd Sess. 
reation. 
25. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA 
Jun 22, 1936 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 
amended by water regulation. 1st Sess. 
Jun 28, 1938 FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th 
Cong. 1st Sess. 
Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 
as amended 1944 
26. UNION CITY DAM, PA 
Oct 23, 1962 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 
2nd Sess. 
27. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA 
Oct 23, 1962 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, recrea- S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 
tion and storage for water quality control. 2nd Sess. 
28. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, 
PA AND MD 
Jun 28, 1938 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low-flow H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 
augmentation, and pollution abatement, purposes. 1st Sess. 
FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th 
Cong. 1st Sess. 
Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 
as amended 1944 
1. Included in the Emergency Relief program April 8, 1935. 
2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 
3. Public Res. 117, 71st. Cong., 3d Sess. 
TABLE 18-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(See Section 6 of Text) 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operations and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Allegheny River, PA, open-channel work Completed 1934 197,000 133,940 
Buckhannon River, 2 1 Completed 1893 5,500 - 
Cheat River, WV 12 Completed 1895 12,997 - 
Pittsburgh Harbor, PA Completed 1922 110,663 81,613 
1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th 
Cong., 1st Sess. 
2. No Commerce reported. 
18-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Construction Non-Federal Operation and 
Project and Status Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Maintenance 
Flood Protection 
Specifically Authorized Projects 
Completed: 
Bradford, PA 1962 7,601,763 1,895,000 - 
Brookville, PA 1963 964,976 289,000 - 
Buckhannon, WV 1972 1,568,661 75,000 - 
Butler, PA 1970 1,556,181 534,000 - 
DuBois, PA 1979 4,464,607 910,000 - 
Elkins, WV 4 - 1,772,627 40,000 - 
Johnsonburg, PA 1958 674,664 130,000 - 
Johnstown, PA4 - 8,865,388 - - 
Kittanning, PA, Part I 1949 130,317 2,000 - 
Latrobe, PA 1951 207,659 44,400 - 
Latrobe, PA 1970 2,556,652 698,000 - 
Olean, NY 1954 3,217,531 597,000 - 
Portage, PA 1965 150,386 14,900 - 
Portville, NY 1954 2,070,484 353,000 - 
Punxsutawney, PA4 - 3,586,107 180,485 - 
Reynoldsville, PA 1959 385,494 26,000 - 
Ridgeway, PA (Elk Creek) 1964 628,888 72,000 - 
Salamanca, NY 1972 2,880,535 465,000 - 
Turtle Creek, PA3 1972 15,242,594 2,240,214 - 
Washington, PA 1964 789,093 323,000 - 
Wellsville, OH, Section I 1956 483,910 113,000 - 
Wellsville, OH, Section II 1956 157,633 - - 
Youngstown, OH 1976 3,621,134 152,200 - 
Active: 
Saw Mill Run, PA - - - - 
Deferred: 
Benwood, WV 1954 81,028 - - 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers 
Completed: 
Amsterdam, OH 1964 183,072 22,500 - 
Big Run, PA 1965 364,208 35,900 - 
Burgettstown, PA - 83,129 - - 
Friendsville, MD - 41,529 2,200 - 
Girty's Run, Millvale, PA 1986 2,655,934 701,722 - 
Granville, PA - 75,908 3,000 - 
Leetonia, OH - 89,299 17,200 - 
Oil City, PA - 43,595 - - 
Oil City Ice Control Structures 1987 3,927,792 25,000 - 
Root Creek, Bolivar, NY 1986 1,591,436 - - 
Slovan, PA - 57,811 - - 
Sykesville, PA - 184,246 9,000 - 
Tarentum, PA 1964 136,591 24,600 - 
Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA 1981 1,554,428 - - 
West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA - 2,021,852 86,200 - 
Wilmore, PA - 96,853 1,300 - 
18-22

PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 
TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(Continued) 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Construction Non-Federal Operation and 
Project and Status Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Maintenance 
Active: 
Ridgeway & Vicinity (on Clarion River)2 1979 132,464 - - 
Inactive: 
Black Fork at Hendricks, WV 1972 6,800 - - 
Oakdale, PA - 14,127 - - 
Rouseville, PA - 1,642 - - 
Wallace, WV1 - 11,035 - - 
Weston Mills, Olean, NY - 50,100 - - 
Weston Mills, Portville, NY - 52,100 - - 
Reservoirs 
Other: 
Rowlesburg Lake, WV 1977 2,857,575 - - 
1. Lacks local support. 
2. No longer economically justified. 
3. Includes $13,510,352 (Federal) and $1,840,000 (Non- 
Federal) original construction cost. 
4. Reported in detail in an individual report. 
18-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 18-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Date Funds Funds 
Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Adena, OH Short Creek) 
Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River)1 
Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area)' 
Bellaire, OH 
Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA' 
Brilliant, OH 
Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) 
Clarington, OH 
Coraopolis, PA 
Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) 
Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH 
Empire-Stratton, OH 
Follansbee, WV 
Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) 
Industry, PA 
Kittanning, PA, part II (Allegheny River) 
Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY2 
Lake Erie-Ohip Canal, OH and PA - 1935 Act 
Leetsdale, PA 1 
Martins Ferry, OH 1 
McKees Rocks, PA 
Mingo Junction, QH - 
Moundsville, WV 
Muddy Creek Dan, PA' 
Neville Island, PA 
New Cumberland, WV 
New Kensington and Parnassus, PA' 
PPiittttssbbuurrgghh,, PA (Golden Triangle) PA (North Side) 
Pittsburgh, PA (The 1trip) 
Powhaten Pjint, OH 
Proctor, WV 
Redbank Creec Lake, PA 
Rochester, PA 
St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) 
Smith Ferry, PA 
Uniontown, P4 
Warwood, WV 
Wellsburg, WV 
West Bridgew ter, PA 
Wheeling, WV 
Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling)' 
Wheeling, V (Wheeling Island) 
Wilcox, PA� 
Woodlands, WV' 
Youghiogheny River, PA and MD (Canalization)1 4 
1975 
1965 
1972 
1941 
1977 
1956 
1954 
1971 
Aug 5, 1977 
Nov 17, 1986 
Nov 17, 1986 
May 6, 1981 
Nov 17, 1986 
Aug 5, 1977 
Aug 5, 1977 
Aug 5, 1977 
Aug 5, 1977 
Aug 5, 1977 
Jan 1, 1990 
Nov 17, 1986 
Aug 5, 1977 
Aug 5, 1977 
Aug 5, 1977 
Nov 6, 1977 
Mar 2, 1970 
May 6, 1981 
Nov 17, 1986 
Nov 17, 1986 
Oct 3, 1978 
Aug 5, 1977 
Nov 17, 1986 
Nov 17, 1986 
Nov 17, 1986 
Aug 5, 1977 
Nov 17,1986 
Oct 3, 1978 
Oct 3, 1978 
Oct 3, 1978 
Nov 17 ,1986 
Nov 17, 1986 
Aug 5, 1977 
Nov 17, 1986 
Aug 5, 1977 
Aug 5, 1977 
Jan 1, 1990 
Nov 17 ,1986 
Aug 5, 1977 
Aug 5, 1977 
Nov 17, 1986 
Nov 17, 1986 
Nov 17, 1986 
Mar 5, 1955 
Nov 17, 1986 
Nov 17, 1986 
1. Deauthorized under Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (PL99-662). 
2. Local Interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, 
authority for project expired Mar. 2, 1970. 
3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, 
authority for project expired Mar. 5, 1955. 
4. Includes $47,195 construction costs expended under 
previous project and $1,700 O&M costs expended under previous 
project. 
18-24 
13,452 
4,100 
64,851 
76,487 
194 
16,884 
100,000 
33,031 
190,722 
1,342,000 
25,164 
402,459 
156,377 
13,529 
6,387 
189,067 
21,700 
16,761 
232,863

TABLE 18-H ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
Dimensions Upper Depths on Mi- 
Avail- Normal ter Sills 
Width able Lift at Pool Ele- at Normal Character of Type of Year 
of LengthNormal vation Pool Level1 Foundation Construction Per- Opened 
Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to 
Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind Com- Naviga- 
No Mouth Nearest Town (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) level). (Feet) (Feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete tion Actual Cost 
2 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 
3 14.5 Cheswick, PA 
4 24.2 Natrona, PA 
5 30.4 Freeport, PA 
6 36.3 Clinton, PA 
7 45.7 Kittanning, PA 
8 52.6 Templeton, PA 
9 62.2 Rimer, PA 
Total 
Abandoned lock and dam 1 
Abandoned lock and dam 2 
Abandoned lock and dam 3 
o Demolishing old dam 1 
t Dredging channel 
mTotal 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
360 11.0 721.0 12.0 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 
360 13.5 731.8 10.8 11.8 Rock Pile-Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 
360 10.5 745.8 10.0 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 
360 11.8 757.0 10.5 10.3 Piling Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 
360 12.2 769.4 10.6 10.8 Rock Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1928 
360 13.1 782.4 9.8 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1930 
Piling 
360 17.9 800.2 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1931 
360 22.0 822.2 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1938 
$ 1,763,485 
1,875,665 
1,707,690 
1,940,537 
1,523,959 
1,460,008 
2,848,920 
2,510,373 
$15,630,637 
591,187 
544,929 
310,103 
26,001 
1,055,003 
$18,157,860 
H 
y 
W
^
x 
v
'V^ 
V
y
t
y 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 
2. Dates shown represent replacement structures.

TABLE 18-I 
Miles 
Above Nearest 
No Mouth Town 
MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS 
(see Section 3 of Text) 
Dimensions NPoromolal 
Avail- Eleva- Depths on Miable 
Lift at tion ter Sills at 
Width Length Normal (feet, Normal Tool Character of Type of Perof 
Cham- to Full Pool mean Level Foundation Construction cent Year 
ber Width Level sea Lower Upper Kind Comn- Opened to Actual 
(feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete Navigation Cost 
2 11.2 Braddock, PA 56 
1103 
3 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 56 
4 41.5 Monessen, PA 563 
- 61.2 Maxwell locks 843 
and dam, 
Maxwell, PA 
- 82.2 Grays Landing 84 
lock and dam, 
Grays Landing, PA 
- 90.8 Point Marion 84 
lock and dam, 
Point Marion, PA 
- 102.0 Morgantown lock 84 
and dam, 
Morgantown, WV 
- 108.0 Hildebrand lock 84 
and dam, 6 
miles above 
Morgantown, WV 
- 115.4 Opekiska lock 842 
and dam, 13.4 
miles above 
Morgantown, WV 
N 
360 8.7 718.7 
720 
360 8.2 726.9 
720 
360 16.6 743.5 
720 
720 19.5 763.0 
720 15.0 778.0 
720 19.0 797.0 
600 17.0 814.0 
600 21.0 835.0 
600 22.0 857.0 
16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19532 $ 17,872,2125 7 
16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19532 17,538,5365 8 
10.7 20.0 Piles Piles Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1932 17,254,0715 6 
15.0 20.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1964 30,110,8895 
18.0 26.0 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 83 1994 166,829,4629 
0
0
O
CI) 
0 
17.0 16.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19932 115,579,8694 5 
14.5 17.8 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19502 8,778,0005 
15.0 14.0 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19592 12,506,8295 O
M17o.v7a5b lRe ck CRocnkc rete Concrete 100 19642 25,179,6225 Z14.0 
14.0 17.75 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19642 25,179,622 r 
Marine ways, etc 
Abandoned lock and dam 1 
Abandoned lock and dam 4 
Abandoned lock and dam 5 
Abandoned lock and dam 6 
Abandoned lock and dam 7 
Abandoned lock and dam 8 
Abandoned lock and dam 9 
Abandoned lock and dam 10 
Abandoned lock and dam 11 
Abandoned lock and dam 12 
Abandoned lock and dam 13 
Abandoned lock and dam 14 
Abandoned lock and dam 15 
Dredging 
Total 
250,0o0oo0 5 
1,019,9075 
780,8165 
1,074,8125 
770,4495 
2,853,58010 
245,90Qs 
191,0005 
210,4455 
227,6685 
200,5505 
190,6915 
210,1275 
175,829 5 
587,8995 
$420,639,1635 
O
0
t-A 
Co) 
co 
�jI 
-

TABLE 18-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS 
(see Section 3 of Text) 
1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depths. 6. Includes $2,173,767 for original reconstruction (1931-2), and $15,080,304 
2. Dates shown for locks and dams No. 2 to 8 inclusive, represent reconstruc- for reconstruction of dam (1963-1967). 
tion. 7. Includes $16,967,114 for reconstruction of locks. 
3. 2 Chambers 8. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation. 
4. Includes $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam, (1958-9), $2,086,438 for 9. Includes AE&D costs for proposed lock ($803,000) and $83,271,383 exoriginal 
reconstruction (1923-1926), $618,758 AE&D costs for replacement of pended from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 
lock, and $109,552,616 for replacement of lock ($54,707,533 CG funds; 10. Includes $213,776 original project and $2,639,804 for reconstruction 
$54,845,083 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund).. (1925). 
5. Actual cost: may include estimated costs which have been footnoted as 
necessary. 
I-'

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 18-J MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV: 
TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR 
(See Section 3 of Text) 
Operation and 
Maintenance, 
Funds New Work General Total 
Regular $420,639,16313 $257,714,5032 $678,353,66612 3 
Maintenance and operation 452,623 452,623 
Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) 13 22,549 22,549 
Total $420,639,16313 $258,189,6752 $678,828,8381 23 
1. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous pro- 3. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation of 
jects. LID 3; $166,026,462 for replacement of LD 7 ($83,271,383 
2. Includes $20,446,587 expended between July 7, 1897 provided by Inland Waterways Trust Fund); and $109,552,616 
and June 30, 1937, on operation and care of works of improve- or replacement of the lock at Point Marion Lock and Dam 
ment under provisions of permanent appropriation for such ($54,845,083 provided by Inland Waterways Trust Fund). 
purposes and excludes $742 for maintenance of previous projects. 
TABLE 18-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS 
(See Section 22 of Text) 
Total 
Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost 
Allegheny: 
Conemaugh River, PA Conemaugh River $46,012,411 
Crooked Creek, PA Crooked Creek 4,482,933 
East Branch Clarion River, PA Clarion River 9,539,586 
Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA and NY Allegheny River 112,226,076 
Loyalhanna, PA Loyalhanna Creek 5,727,531 
Mahoning Creek, PA Mahoning Creek 7,144,973 
Tionesta, PA Tionesta Creek 7,792,378 
Union City, PA French Creek 14,559,800 
Woodcock Creek, PA Woodcock Creek 20,545,065 
Beaver: 
Berlin, OH Mahoning River 8,739,987 
Michael J. Kirwan, OH Mahoning River 17,376,097 
Mosquito Creek, OH Mosquito Creek 4,253,029 
Shenango River, PA and OH Shenango River 40,217,201 
Monongahela: 
Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV West Fork River $210,328,6532 
Youghiogheny River, PA and MD Youghiogheny River 12,521,167 
1. Includes $2,921,000 for dam rehabilitation. 
2. Actual cost. Latest cost estimate (1991) is $231,000,000. 
18-28

PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 
TABLE 18-L INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 29 of Text) 
Project 
Amsterdam, OH 
Big Run, PA 
Bolivar, NY 
Bradford, PA 
Brookville, PA 
Buckhannon, WV 
Burgettstown-Slovan, PA 
Butler, PA 
Chartiers Creek, PA 
Cannonsburg-Houston Reach 
James G. Fulton Reach 
Colliers, WV 
DuBois, PA 
Eldred, PA 
Etna, PA 
Friendsville, MD 
Granville, PA 
Johnsonburg, PA 
Kittaning, PA 
Latrobe, PA 
Leetonia, OH 
Dates of Inspection 
Jul 1995 
Aug 1995 
Oct 1994 
Jul 1995 
Mar 1995 
Sep 1994 
Dec 1994 
Mar 1995 
Dec 1994 
Jul 1995 
Sep 1994 
Aug 1995 
Apr 1987 
Feb 1995 
Apr 1995 
Dec 1994 
Nov 1994 
Jul 1995 
Sep 1994 
May 1994 
Project 
Marianna, PA 
Millvale, PA 
Oil City 
Ice Control Structure, 
Allegheny River, PA 
Oil City LPP-(Dike), PA 
Olean, NY 
Portage, PA 
Portville, NY 
Reynoldsville, PA 
Ridgway, PA 
Salamanca, NY 
Stonewood-Nutter Fort, WV 
Sykesville, PA 
Tarentum, PA 
Turtle Creek, PA 
Washington, PA 
Wellsville, OH 
Weston, WV 
Wilmore, PA 
Youngstown, PA 
Dates of Inspection 
Apr 1995 
Mar 1995 
Feb 1995 
Feb 1995 
Oct 1994 
Oct 1994 
Oct 1994 
Aug 1995 
Nov 1994 
Oct 1994 
Jun 1992 
Aug 1995 
Nov 1994 
Sep 1987 
Dec 1994 
Sep 1995 
Aug 1994 
Oct 1994 
May 1994 
18-29

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 18-M FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
(See Section 31 of Text) 
Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, 
Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) 
Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs 
Clarion River, Ridgeway, PA (terminated) $ 65 
Connellsville, PA (initial appraisal) 1,433 
Belington, WV (terminated) 57 
Little Yankee Creek, Hubbard, OH (terminated) 63 
Hickman Run, Little Tyrone Twp (terminated) 13 
McGary Hollow Run, Weston, WV (terminated) 52 
Dunlap Creek, Redstone Twp, PA (reconnaissance) 4A.044 
Total Cost for Current Fiscal Year $45,727 
Emergency Streambank Protection - Section 14 of the 
1846 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress 
Project/Study Identification 
Brush Creek, Jeannette, PA (planning & design analysis) 
Buffalo Creek, Freeport, PA (planning & design analysis) 
Chadakoin River, Jamestown, NY (completed) 
Chubb Run, Franklin, PA (completed) 
Conneaut Lake, PA (awaiting construction approval) 
Cox Run, Wellsburg, WV (completed) 
Downers Run, Fayette City, PA (terminated) 
French Creek, Wattsburg, PA (awaiting construction approval) 
Mahoning River, Warren, OH (completed) 
Main Street, Wellsburg, WV (completed) 
Middle School, Wellsburg, WV (completed) 
Mill Run, Sinclairville, NY (completed) 
Millers Run, Cecil Twp, PA (completed) 
Nelson Run, Ross Twp. PA (completed) 
Ohio River, Chester, WV (planning & design analysis) 
Plum Creek, Oakmont, PA (completed) 
Saw Mill Run RD, Salamanca, NY (completed) 
Sewer Outfall, Glendale, WV (terminated) 
Short Creek, Ohio County, WV (terminated) 
Shupe Run, Mt. Pleasant, PA (completed) 
Water Works, Park & Pool, Wellsburg, WV (completed) 
West Fork River, Clarksburg, WV (terminated) 
Total Cost for Current Fiscal Year: 
Fiscal Year Costs 
$ 2,516 
2,309 
67,286 
9,894 
14,938 
2,309 
116 
8,094 
21,183 
17 
40 
98,068 
91,352 
109,405 
1,302 
58,383 
66 
45 
2,021
19 
38 
$487,20469 
$487,204 
18-30

OHIO RIVER 
For actual construction of locks and dams, and operation 
and care of completed structures, river is divided 
into three sections under immediate supervision and 
direction of District Engineers at Pittsburgh, Huntington, 
and Louisville. Pittsburgh section extends 127 
miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to a point 
immediately upstream from New Martinsville, WV, and 
includes Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, New 
Cumberland, Pike Island, and Hannibal Locks and 
Dams. Huntington section extends 311 miles from mile 
127 to 438 immediately upstream from Foster, KY, and 
includes Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Robert C. 
Byrd, Greenup, and Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks 
and Dams. Louisville section extends 543 miles from 
mile 438 to mouth of river, and includes Markland and 
McAlpine Locks and Dams (with Louisville and Portland 
Canal), Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown, and 
Smithland Locks and Dams, and Locks and Dams 52 
and 53. 
Improvements 
Navigation 
1. Construction of locks and dams on 
O hio R iver...................................................... 19-1 
2. Open channel work, Ohio River .................... 19-3 
Tables 
Table 19-A 
Table 19-B 
Table 19-C 
Table 19-D 
Table 19-E 
Cost and Financial Statement..... 19-5 
Authorizing Legislation ............... 19-6 
Not Applicable 
Not Applicable 
Not Applicable 
Table 19-F Not Applicable 
Table 19-G Not Applicable 
Table 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams on 
Ohio River, Total Cost of Existing 
Project............................. ............. 19-7 
Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission Licenses of Locks 
and Dams, Ohio River ................. 19-7 
Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams 
Statistics ...................................... 19-8 
Navigation 
1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND 
DAMS ON OHIO RIVER 
Location. Ohio River is formed by junction of 
Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers at Pittsburgh, PA, 
and flows generally southwesterly for 981 miles to join 
Mississippi River near Cairo, IL. For description of river 
see page 1227, 1932 Annual Report. 
Previous Projects. For details see page 1907 of 
Annual Report for 1915. 
Existing project. Provides for improvement of entire 
river by construction of locks and dams to provide 
channel depth of 9 feet and for widening Louisville and 
Portland Canal at Louisville, KY. Project provides for a 
lock with usable dimensions of 110 by 600 feet at each of 
the dams and, in addition, an auxiliary lock 56 by 360 
feet is available at Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, 
and McAlpine Locks and Dams with an auxiliary lock at 
Robert C. Byrd being 110 by 1,200 feet. Dashields is a 
fixed dam, while Emsworth, Montgomery, and Robert 
C. Byrd are fixed dams with movable crests. Remaining 
dams are movable type, with navigable pass varying in 
width from 600 to 1,248 feet. In addition to navigable 
pass, movable-type dams are also provided with one or 
more regulating weirs. At McAlpine Locks and Dam, a 
canal (Louisville and Portland) extends along left bank 
for 2 miles, with locks at lower end. Modifications to 
existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 
1909 Act, provide for fixed dams with movable crests 
with two locks (110 by 1,200 feet and 110 by 600 feet) at 
New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, 
Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony 
Meldahl, Markland, Cannelton, Newburgh, and 
Uniontown; two locks 110 by 1,200 feet at Smithland; 
110- by 1,200-foot temporary locks in addition to the 
existing locks at Locks and Dams 52 and 53, and reconstruction 
to provide a 110- by 1,200-foot lock in addition 
to existing locks and a fixed dam with two section of 
movable crest at McAlpine Locks and Damn; widening 
Louisville and Portland Canal to 500 feet. Auxiliary lock 
56 by 360 feet at McAlpine Locks and Dam has been 
inoperative since failure of downstream lock gates in 
December 1972. Rehabilitation of existing Locks and 
Dams 52 and 53 was started in September 1979 under 
the purview of Section 6, March 1909 Act. Mound City 
was also considered authorized under purview of 1909 
Act, and preconstruction planning was performed in the 
period 1965 to 1972. The ruling of the U.S. District 
Court, District of Columbia, on September 6, 1974, with 
reference to Lock and Dam 26, Mississippi River, would 
also apply to this project. Consequently, it is no longer 
considered authorized. Operation and care of locks and 
dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under 
provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of 
June 26, 1934. Estimated Federal cost of new work 
(existing project, 1983), is $1,728,688,694; estimated 
19-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
non-Federal cost is $14,999,000. Foregoing estimate 
does not include expenditures on previous projects. 
Various items previously included in this project are 
considered inactive or unnecessary and are excluded 
from foregoing cost estimate. See page 693, Annual 
Report, 1968, for items and estimated cost. Under 
authority of 1910 River and Harbor Act, Louisville and 
Portland Canal was widened to 200 feet; Locks and 
Dams 40 and 42 eliminated; Locks and Dams 1 and 2 
replaced by Emsworth Locks and Dam; Lock and Dam 
3 replaced by Dashields Locks and Dam; and Locks and 
Dams 4, 5, and 6 replaced by Montgomery Locks and 
Dam. Locks and Dams 24, 25, and 26 were replaced by 
Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam authorized by August 
30, 1935, Act, and constructed under project for improving 
lower Kanawha River. Locks and Dams 7, 8, and 9 
were replaced by New Cumberland Locks and Dam; 
Locks and Dams 10 and 11 were replaced by Pike Island 
Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 12, 13, and 14 were 
replaced by Hannibal Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 
15, 16, and 17 were replaced by Willow Island Locks and 
Dam; Locks and Dams 18, 19, and 20 were replaced by 
Belleville Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 21, 22, and 
23 were replaced by Racine Locks and Dam; Locks and 
Dams 27, 28, 29, and 30 were replaced by Greenup 
Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 31, 32, 33, and 34 were 
replaced by Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam; 
Locks and Dams 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39 were replaced by 
Markland Locks and Dam; the Louisville and Portland 
Canal at McAlpine Locks and Dam were widened to 500 
feet. Locks and Dams 43, 44, and 45 were replaced by 
Cannelton Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 46 and 47 
were replaced by Newburgh Locks and Dam; Locks and 
Dams 48 and 49 were replaced by Uniontown Locks and 
Dam, and Locks and Dams 50 and 51 were replaced by 
Smithland Locks and Dam, as modifications to existing 
project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, 
reducing total number of structures to 20. The Water 
Resources Development Act of 1974 combined the 
Newburgh Bank Protection Works project with the 
Newburgh Locks and Dam project. A December 1981 
Act established the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife 
Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks and Dam to 
protect and preserve existing fossilized coral and a 
diversity of wildlife. A November 17, 1988 Act authorized 
a replacement structure for Locks & Dams 52 & 53 
at Olmsted, IL. A November 28, 1990 Act authorized an 
interpretive center at the Falls of the Ohio National 
Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks & 
Dam and a replacement of the existing 110 foot x 600 
foot lock at McAlpine Locks & Dam, IN & KY. Table 19- 
J contains data relative to various features of locks and 
dams included in existing project. For list of principal 
towns and cities along Ohio River with their mileage 
below Pittsburgh, PA, see page 1060, 1962 Annual 
Report. See Table 19-I for licenses. 
Navigation system of 21 locks and dams is in operation 
and 9-foot navigation throughout length of river is 
generally available at all times. At certain unstable bars 
project depth is maintained by dredging, supplemented 
by contraction works. (See "Open Channel Work, Ohio 
River.") Table 19-J shows cost and year completion of 
locks and dams now in operation. Existing project does 
not provide adequate facilities for present day navigation 
due to obsolescence of structures. Since repair and 
modernization of these facilities would be extremely 
costly, replacement and reconstruction is being accomplished 
as rapidly as funds are made available for the 
purpose. Construction of lock and dam replacement 
program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1955. New Cumberland, 
Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, 
Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, 
McAlpine, Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown, 
and Smithland replacement locks and dams are in 
operation, replacing 39 old low-lift locks and dams. For 
total cost of existing project, see Table 19-H. 
Terminal facilities. Modern public terminals, with 
warehouses, equipped with operating machinery for 
transferring materials, have been constructed by private 
interests at some of the larger cities and towns. A 
list of terminals on Ohio River is revised annually and 
can be obtained from Division Engineer, U.S. Army 
Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work by 
contract and hired labor: 
Willow Island Locks and Dam: Construction was 
initiated in January 1967. All work is complete. 
Belleville Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated 
in May 1962. All work is complete. 
Racine Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in 
June 1964 is complete. 
Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam: The existing project, 
constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha 
River, was placed in operation in August 1937. The 
dimensions of the existing locks chambers and poor 
approach conditions, particularly to downstream traffic, 
have created a higher than normal accident rate to 
the structure with corresponding hazards and delays to 
traffic. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 
authorized Phase I studies for 1,200-foot locks in a 
bypass canal. These studies are complete. 
Initial Construction, General funds for the continuation 
of Engineering activities were received in September 
1985. Real estate acquisition is complete. The 
contract for the Locks was awarded in October 1987 and 
is complete. The contract for the Dam Rehabilitation 
was awarded in June 1993 and is 71 percent complete. 
The total estimated cost of the project is $384 million, 
which is 50 percent federal cost and 50 percent Inland 
Waterways Trust Fund cost. 
Greenup Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated 
in October 1954. All work is complete. 
Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam: Construction 
work complete. 
Markland Locks and Dam: Project is complete including 
a public highway bridge across the navigation 
structure, as authorized by the Federal Aid Highway 
Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-606). For details of bridge see 
page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1978. 
Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area 
was authorized by Public Law 97-137 on December 29, 
19-2

OHIO RIVER 
1981 and modified by Public Law 101-640 on November 
28, 1990 to design and construct an interpretive center. 
The Conservation Area will protect 1,000 acres which 
consists of birdlife and other wildlife. Planning consisted 
of efforts to define facilities to be cost shared with 
local interests. All Real Estate tracts have been acquired 
and condemnation trials continue. A construction 
contract to construct the cost-shared recreation 
facilities was awarded on 30 September 1993, and 
completed in February 1995, $80,664. 
McAlpine Locks and Dam: Project is complete except 
for alteration of lift section of railroad bridge that spans 
the upper end of the Louisville and Portland Canal 
which work is presently deferred. A replacement of the 
existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock with a new 110 foot x 
1,200 foot lock was authorized by Public Law 101-640. 
Advanced Engineering and Design was continued. 
$2,494,459. 
Cannelton Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in 
October 1960 is complete. 
Newburgh Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in 
October 1962 is complete. 
Uniontown Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in 
October 1961 is complete. 
Smithland Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in 
1966 is complete. 
Locks and Dam No. 52 (New Lock): Construction 
initiated in December 1967 is complete. 
Locks and Dam No. 53 (Temporary Lock): Construction 
initiated in December 1972 is complete. 
Locks and Dam No. 52 (Rehabilitation): Construction 
initiated in June 1979 is complete. 
Locks and Dam No. 53 (Rehabilitation): Construction 
initiated in June 1979 is complete. 
Olmsted Locks & Dam: A replacement structure for 
Locks and Dams 52 & 53 was authorized by the WRDA 
of 1988 in Public Law 100-676 on 17 November 1988. 
Advanced Engineering and Design continued. A contract 
to construct the Access Road, Resident Engineers 
Office, and Visitor Center was awarded in December 
1992 and advanced to 97 percent completion. A contract 
to begin construction on the Stage 1 Cofferdam and the 
Slide Repair was awarded in May 1993 and advanced to 
88 percent completion. A dam prototype construction 
contract was awarded 18 March 1994 and advanced to 
78 percent completion, $45,522,814. 
Operation and maintenance, general. Locks and 
dams operated as required and necessary repairs and 
improvements made thereto and to operator's quarters, 
grounds and esplanades. Costs were $15,237,381 for 
Huntington District, $23,549,975 for Louisville District, 
and $15,082,116 for Pittsburgh District. 
2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, 
OHIO RIVER 
Location. Under jurisdiction of district engineer in 
whose district work is located. Portion of river included 
in project extends 974.7 miles from head of river at 
Pittsburgh, PA, to mouth of Cache River (Mound City, 
IL). Open channel improvement from mouth of Cache 
River to mouth of Ohio River is under jurisdiction of 
Mississippi River Commission. 
Existing Projects. Before completion of canalization 
project, no project depth had been fixed by Congress 
under project for open channel work; but, in order to 
properly aid packet and barge navigation, it was necessary 
to secure a low-water channel with a minimum 
depth of 4 to 6 feet, and a width, depending upon 
difficulty of running channel, of 400-600 feet; also, to 
permit movement of large coal tows, which movement 
occurred at stages of water exceeding 10 feet, it was 
necessary to remove points of projecting bars which 
formed at various locations along river. Accomplishment 
of this purpose involved concentration of current 
by closing back channels at islands with low dams, 
contraction and straightening wide open channels by 
low dikes, dredging bars and shoals, and removal of 
snags and wrecks. Incidental to direct improvement of 
Ohio River is construction and maintenance of ice piers 
as required for protection of river craft. Stage of 
extreme high water on Ohio River varies from 46 feet at 
Pittsburgh, PA, to 80 feet at Cincinnati OH, with 57.2 
feet at Louisville, KY (head of falls, 53.8 feet at Evansville, 
IN, and 59.5 feet at Cairo, IL (mouth of river). 
Estimated cost of new work (1960) is $16.16 million, 
exclusive of following items which are considered inactive: 
Ice piers authorized by 1927 River and Harbor Act; 
reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula near 
Evansville, IN, authorized by 1930 River and Harbor 
Act; dredging to widen channel at certain points; and 
placing revetment at various points. Estimated cost of 
these items (1954 is $6,565,000. Operation of snag boats 
on Ohio River below Pennsylvania State line was included 
in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of 
Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. 
See Table 19-B for authorizing legislation. 
New work under this project is substantially complete, 
since it is not anticipated that work on inactive 
portion of project will be accomplished. In addition to 
dredging, local stabilization of channel has been effected 
at various points by construction-of dikes and revetment. 
Work which remains consists of dredging to 
widen channels at certain points to project depth. 
Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of January 
21, 1927, authorizing construction of ice piers for 
general open channel work, imposes condition that 
before work is begun on any pier, local interests convey 
to the United States free of cost such riparian rights as 
may be deemed necessary in connection with the improvements 
at locality (H. Doc. 187, 67th Congr., 2nd 
Sess.). Existing ice piers are adequate for present 
purposes and local cooperation is not needed since no 
additional construction is under consideration. River 
and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930, provides for reforestation 
of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula and bank protection 
and that no expense shall be incurred by the United 
States for acquiring lands required for purpose of this 
improvement (H. Doc. 409, 69th Congr., 1st Sess.). 
However, since no serious overbank erosion has oc- 
19-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
curred since bank revetment in 1933-34, reforestation is 
not considered justifiable at this time and no local 
cooperation is required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operation and 
maintenance, general: Dredging was done where required 
to provide an adequate and dependable channel 
of project depth at minimum pool conditions. Dikes and 
revetments were maintained and routine work of 
maintaining navigation aids, removing snags, making 
channel studies, hydrographic surveys and mapping 
was performed as required. Channel soundings, hydrographic 
surveys, stream gaging operations, channel 
inspections and aids to navigation, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports cost $1,933,442. There was no 
dredging by hired labor on the Ohio River in FY 95. 
Dredging by contract: Huntington District, 740,130 
cubic yards at $1,802,734. Louisville District 857,000 
cubic yards at $2,096,300. 
19-4

OHIO RIVER 
Table 19-A Cost and Financial Statement 
See 
Section Total Cost To 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep 30, 1995 (footnotes) 
1. Construction of 
Locks and Dams 
on Ohio River 
2. Open Channel 
Work, Ohio River 
New Work 
Approp. $2 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 4 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. (O&M) 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
35,770,000 $42,527,000 $108,849,000 
38,822,023 30,089,360 59,712,979 
$19,501,436 $1,837,040,028 1 3 5 10 17 21 
62,302,133 1,816,412,852 1 3 6 11 12 15 16 18 22 
39,641,315 44,200,500 52,090,500 54,116,000 953,207,613 2 4 19 
0,210,217 41,352,798 52,213,210 53,869,472 949,146,804 2 13 14 19 20 
0 
1,801
0 
84 
82,972,138 
82,972,138 
33,914,252 
33,914,252 
15,962,260 8 
15,962,260 8 
4,826,500 4,715,000 5,328,100 5,656,100 151,344,981 ' " 
4,898,751 3,228,916 5,833,128 5,832,476 150,393,163 ' 9 
- - - - 944,649 
- - - - 944,649 
1 Includes $17,003,761 for previous 6-foot canalization project. 
2 Includes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 on operation 
and care of work of improvement under provisions of permanent 
indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 
3 Includes $215,812 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 
4 Includes $38,766 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 
s Excludes $251,769 contributed funds for new work. 
6 Excludes $250,102 contributed funds for new work. 
' Excludes $1,621,349 expended in operation ofsnagboats under 
provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes, 
and $267 transferred to project without reimbursement. 
8 Includes $1,040,236 Public Works funds. 
s Includes $1,000 for removal of obstructions in Licking River 
under authority of Section 3, R&H Act of 1930. 
o1I0n cludes $100,000 placed in Fiscal Year 1971 Budget Reserve. 
11 Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without 
reimbursement. 
12 Surplus propertyvalued at $3,553 transferred to project without 
reimbursement. 
13 Excludes $2,140 transferred to projectwithout reimbursement. 
14 Excludes surplus property valued at $73,832 transferred to 
projectwithout reimbursement. 
15 Includes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. 
16 Excludes surplus property valued at $297,385 transferred to 
projectwithout reimbursement. 
17 Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $572,162 Code 711 Funds, 
$532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,759,812 Code 713 funds. 
18 Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $342,162 Code 711 Funds, 
$532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,989,812 Code 713 Funds. 
19 Includes $2,158,073 Funds provided from The Productive 
Employment Appropriations Act of 1983 (PL 98-8). 
3o Includes $920,945 cost for operations and care of previous 
projects. 
21 Includes $223,259,000 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 
22 Includes $213,734,453 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 
19-5 
22 
34

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 19-B Authorizing Legislation 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
2. Open Channel Work, Ohio River 
March 3, 1827 
January 21, 1927 
July 3, 1930 
July 3, 1958 
Project adopted by this act originally 
covered entire length of Ohio River 
from its mouth near Cairo to 
Pittsburgh, a distance of 981 miles. 
It provided for removal of all 
obstructions which tend to endanger 
steamboat navigation. 
Construct ice piers as a part of 
allotted from appropriations for 
general open channel work. 
Reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky 
Peninsula near Evansville, IN, and 
a 200-foot strip along bank and for 
bank protection, at an estimated cost 
of $200,000. 
Act of March 3, 1827, modified to 
include maintenance of existing 
Licking River Channel within lower 
3-mile limit of river slack water, 
at an estimated increase of $1,000 
in cost of average annual maintenance. 
Locks and Dams, Ohio River 
H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 434, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. 
December 29, 1981 
November 17, 1988 
November 28, 1990 
November 28, 1990 
October 31, 1992 
Act of December 29, 1981, established H.R. 2241, PL97-137, Title II, 
the 1,000-acre Falls of the Ohio 95 Stat. 1710 
National Wildlife Conservation Area, 
at a cost not to exceed $300,000. 
Act of November 17, 1988 authorized PL 100-676, 100th Cong., 
a replacement structure for Locks and 2nd Sess. 
Dams 52 and 53 at Olmsted, Illinois. 
Act of November 28, 1990, modified PL 101-640, 101st Cong., 
PL 97-137 by authorizing an 2nd Sess. 
interpretive center at Falls of the 
Ohio National Wildlife Conservation 
Area, at a estimated total cost of 
$3,200,000. 
Act of November 28, 1990 authorized PL 101-640, 101st Cong., 
a modernization of the existing 110 2nd Sess. 
foot x 600 foot lock at McAlpine Locks 
and Dam, Indiana and Kentucky at a total 
cost of $219,600,000 with one-half 
appropriated from the Treasury and 
one-half from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 
Act of October 31, 1992 PL 102-580, 102nd Cong., 
renamed the Gallipolis Locks and Dam 2nd Sess. 
to the Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam. 
19-6

OHIO RIVER 
TABLE 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River 
Total Cost of Existing Project to September 30, 1995 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
Operations and 
Maintenance 
Funds New Work General Rehabilitation Total 
Regular $1,724,015,677 $908,185,087 $116,886,390 $2,749,087,154 
Public Works 3,258,368 0 0 3,258,368 
Emergency Relief 1,198,837 19,000 1,217,837 
Maintenance & Operation 3,039,789 3,039,789 
Public Works Acceleration 215,812 38,766 254,578 
Executive 1963 0 
Total $1,728,688,694 3 $911,282,642 12 $116,886,390 4 $2,756,857,726 
1Excludes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 under 3Excludes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. 
permanentindefinite appropriation. 4Includes $33,914,252 cost for O & M Rehabilitation. 
2Excludes $920,945 cost for operation and care ofprevious projects. Note: All other costvariations arelisted in the Footnotes ofTable 19-A. 
Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses 
At Locks and Dams, Ohio River 
Markland Dam McAlpine Dam Racine Dam Greenup Dam Hannibal Dam 
F.E.R.C License 2,211 289:1,000 2,570 2,614 3,206 
License 
Annual Charge 
Collections to end 
of Fiscal Year 1995 
Public Service Co. 
of Indiana 
$ 45,950.00 
$1,330,661.64 
Louisville Gas 
and Electric Co. 
$ 95,000.00 
$8,910,353.84 
Ohio Power Co. 
$ 64,232.00 
$871,486.00 
City of Vanceburg, City of New 
Kentucky Martinsville, WV 
$ 261,103.00 
$3,324,710.00 
-0- 
$197,589.03 
19-7

Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
Lock Dimensions Upper 
Normal 
Greatest Pool 
Length Elevation Depth on 
Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual 
Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Dat 
and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each L 
Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and D
Cost 
e of 
ock 
am 
1 - Replaced 
6.2 Emsworth Locks 
and Dam, 
Emsworth, PA 
2 - Replaced 
3 - Replaced 
13.3 Dashields Locks 
and Dam 
1.6 miles below 
Sewickley, PA 
4 - Replaced 
5 - Replaced 
6 - Replaced 
31.7 Montgomery 
Locks and Dam, 
1.4 miles above 
Industry, PA 
7 - Replaced 
8 - Replaced 
54.4 New Cumberland 
Locks and Dam, 
Stratton, OH 
9 - Replaced 
10 - Replaced 
11 - Replaced 
84.3 Pike Island Locks 
and Dam, 2 miles 
upstream from 
Warwood, WV 
12 - Replaced 
13 - Replaced 
14 - Replaced 
126.4 Hannibal Locks 
and Dam, 1.6 miles 
upstream from New 
Martinsville, WV 
15 - Replaced 
16 - Replaced 
161.7 Willow Island 
Locks and Dam, 
2.7 miles above 
Waverly, WV 
17 - Replaced 
110 
56 
110 
56 
110 
56 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
600 
360 
600 
360 
600 
360 
1,200 
600 
1,200 
600 
1,200 
600 
110 1,200 
110 600 
18.0 710.0 17.014 12.9 s Rock 
15.51 12.9 3 
10.0 692.0 13.41 17.53 Rock 
Rock 
and 
Piles 
Rock 
- - $ 870,034 
100 1921 $ 43,347,635 2 14 
- - 976,767 
- - 1,144,588 
100 1929 37,447,328 1
5 
1,071,472 
1,080,132 
1,123,442 
17.5 
20.5 
21.0 
21.0 
20.0 
682.0 
664.5 
644.0 
623.0 
602.0 
16.01 14.63 Rock Rock 
and and 
Piles Piles 
7.01 14.83 Rock 
17.01 
38.0 
18.01 Rock 
17.0 Rock 
35.0 15.0 Rock 
and 
Piles 
Rock 
Rock 
Rock 
Rock 
100 1936 37,754,307 16 
- - 1,075,000 
- - 1,167,456 
100 1959 39,099,688 
- - 1,177,100 
- - 1,138,000 
- - 1,162,165 
100 1968 56,623,946 
- - 1,166,104 
- - 1,222,389 
- - 1,133,371 
99 1972 87,902,000 
100 1972 
1,180,478 
1,275,532 
78,173,881 
1,362,591 
O
0O
0
0
IO 
O1 
zI 
0

Table 19-J 
(Continued) 
Ohio River Locks and Dams 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
Lock Dimensions Upper 
Normal 
Greatest Pool 
Length Elevation Depth on 
Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual C 
Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date 
and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to EachLo 
Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Da
ost 
of 
ck 
mun 
- Replaced 
- Replaced 
- Replaced 
103.9 Belleville 
Locks and Dam, 
0.3 mile below 
Reedsville, OH 
- Replaced 
- Replaced 
- Replaced 
237.5 Racine Locks 
and Dam, 1.5 
miles below 
Letart Falls, OH 
- Replaced 
- Replaced 
- Replaced 
279.2 Robert C. Byrd 
Locks and Dam, 
0.7 mile below' 
Hogsett, WV 
Robert C. Byrd 
Modernization 
27 Rehab Dam and New Lock 
27 - Replaced 
28 - Replaced 
29 - Replaced 
30 - Replaced 
341.0 Greenup Locks 
and Dam, 4.9 
miles below 
Greenup, KY 
31 - Replaced 
32 - Replaced 
33 - Replaced 
34 - Replaced 
436.2 Captain Anthony 
Meldabl Locks 
and Dam,2.2 miles 
above Foster, KY 
110 
110 
110 
110 
1,200 
600 
1,200 
600 
110 1,200 
110 1,200 
110 600 
110 
110 
110 
111100o 
1,200 
600 
1,200 
600 
22.0 
22.0 
582.0 
560.0 
23.0 538.0 
37.0 15.03 Rock 
and Piles 
18.0 15.0 Rock 
and Piles 
18.0 15.0 Rock 
Rock 
Rock 
Rock 
- - $ 927,091 
- - 1,213,848 
- - 936,696 
100 1968 62,591,255 
- - 1,484,562 
- - 1,218,798 
- - 1,851,488 
100 1971 64,922,680 
- - 1,187,542 
- - 1,925,205 
- - 1,307,241 
- 3,452,066 
100 1992 303,880,908 
" 
- - 1,063,133 
- - 1,088,802 
- - 1,579,618 
30.0 515.0 18.0' 13.0 Rock Rock 100 1959 57,464,191 
. 1,359,231 
- - 2,951,216 
. - 1,937,166 
- . ,437,057 
30.0 485.0 18.01 15.0 Rock Rock 100 1962 74,188216 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
S 24 
25 
26 
O
0

Table 19-J 
(Continued) 
Ohio River Locks and Dams 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
LockDimensions Upper 
Normal 
Greatest Pool 
Length Elevation Depth on 
Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual 
Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Dal 
and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each 
Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and D
SCost 
te of 
Lock 
)am 
35 
36 
37 
38 
39 
40 
41 
42 
43 
44 
45 
46 
47 
48 
49 
$ 1,894,942 
3,704,535 
1,297,924 
2,857,040 
110 
110 
N/A 
110 
110 
56
- 
110 
110 
110 
1,200 
600 
N/A 
200 
600 
360 
1,200 
600 
35.0 
N/A 
37.0 
455.0 
N/A 
49.0 
420.0 
- Replaced 
- Replaced 
- Replaced 
- Replaced 
531.5 Markland Locks 
and Dam, 1 mile 
above Markland, IN 
- Replaced 
- Eliminated 
Falls of the 
Ohio, 1 mile 
above McAlpine 
604.0 McAlpine Locks 
and Dam 
(Reconstruction 
of Locks and 
Dam 41) 
- Eliminated 
- Replaced 
- Replaced 
- Replaced 
720.7 Cannelton Locks 
and Dam, 
3 miles above 
Cannelton, IN 
- Replaced 
776.1 Newburgh Locks 
and Dam, 16 
miles above 
Evansville, IN 
- Replaced 
- Replaced 
- Replaced 
846.0 Uniontown 
Locks and Dam, 
3.5 miles below 
Uniontown, KY 
- Replaced 
50.0 15.0 Rock Piles 
N/A N/A N/A N/A 
12.0 
19.0 
19.0 
11.0 
11.0 
Rock Rock 
38.0 13.0 Rock Rock 
100 1963 63,019,403 
- - 2,222,448 
- - 7,658,134 ' 
0 N/A 2,353,580 
100 1961 45,726,189 ' 
- - 2,592,242 
- - 2,819,930 
- - 3,202,890 
100 1972 99,032,866 1o 
3,129,028 
110 1,200 
110 600 16.0 358.0 32.0 16.0 Rock Pile 99 1975 104,496,840 
4,415,526 
3,062,710 
3,325,964 
110 
110 
1,200 
600 22.0 342.0 34.0 12.0 Rock Rock 99 1975 100,326,373 
25.0 383.0 
0
0
C
0
0
0I
0
A
OI 
0c 
50 3,571,762

Table 19-J 
(Continued) 
Ohio River Locks and Dams 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
Lock Dimensions Upper 
Normal 
Greatest Pool 
Length Elevation Depth on 
Width Available (feet, Miter ills Actual Cos 
Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date of 
and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock 
Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 
51 - Replaced 
918.5 Smithland Locks 
and Dam, 2 
miles above 
Smithland, KY 
52 938 9 1.4 miles below 
Brookport, IL 
938.9 1.4 miles below 
Brookport, IL 
(New lock) 
964.4 Olmsted Locks & 
Dam at Olmsted, IL 
53 62.6 10.8 miles 
above Mound 
City, IL 
962.6 10.8 miles 
above Mound 
City, IL 
(New lock) 
974.2 Mound City 
Lock and Dam, 
1 mile below 
Mound City, IL 
110 
110 
110 
1,200 
1,200 
600 
110 1,200 
110 1,200 
110 600 
110 1,200 
$ 4,370,566 
22.0 324.0 
12.0 302.0 
12.0 302.0 
21.0 300.0 
13.4 290.0 
13.4 290.0 
34.0 12.0 Rock Rock 99 1980 273,725,471 
15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1928 13,337,747 11 
15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1969 10,197,516 
18.0 18.0 Pile Pile 12 2007 122,025,335 18 
15.4 9.69 Pile Pile 100 1929 10,004,240 12 
15.4 9.6 Pile 100 1982 38,570,920 
1,539,470 13 
$1,933,318,412 'i 
' Depths are on emergency dam foundation and recontrolling depths. 
Change from fixed dam to lift-gate dam completed in 1938. 
' Depths are on poiree dam foundation and are controlling depths. 
SLand chamber. 
s River chamber. 
' Roller-gate dam. Cost not included in total. Constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. 7Lock and Dam 41 completed with 110- by 600-foot lock in 1921. Completed with new dam and raised canal 
and lock wall in 1928. Auxiliary 56- by 360-foot lock constructed in 1929-30. Reconstruction and modernization 
began 1956, renamed McAlpine Locks and Dam in 1960. Operation of auxiliary lock suspended in 1971. 8 Existing structures are complete except for deferred alteration of railroad bridge. Construction of the new 
110 foot x 1,200 foot lock has not yet begun. 
' Dam below not yet constructed. Depth on lower miter sill at lower water. 
'�Excludes $2,219,975 payment for settlement of damage to dam caused by barge accident in April 1978. 
"Major rehabilitation ($8,876,000) initiated in FY 79 is complete. 
" Major rehabilitation ($4,593,572) initiated in FY 79 is complete. 
" For preconstruction planning 1965 to 1972. No longer considered authorized. (See Section 1 of Text.) 
4 Includes $37,485,870 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 84 
" Includes $33,914,252 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 90 (O&M funds). 
" Includes $33,016,696 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 89. 
'7 Includes $152,821,969 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 
18Includes $60,912,484 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 
Excluos ive of $7,013,405 details below. 
Additional Features Entering into Cost of Project 
Louisville and Portland Canal and Indiana chute 
(under previous project) 
Examinations, survey contingencies, plants, and miscellaneous 
Waterfront Development at Huntington, WV (Greenup Pool). 
Recreation facilities, pool area, Gallipolis Locks and Dam 
TOTAL 
GRAND TOTAL 
$ 5,359,203 
966,232 
19,170 
668,800 
7,013,405 
$1,940,331,817 
t 
TOTAL 
O
0

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT *
The District comprises Ohio, Northwestern 
Pennsylvania and western and northern New York, 
embracing U.S. waters of Lake Erie exclusive of small 
portion of western end, Lake Ontario, and St. 
Lawrence River, with their tributary drainage basins 
from boundary between the states of Ohio and 
Michigan to international boundary line east of 
Frontier, New York. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation 
1. Ashtabula Harbor, OH 
2. Black Rock Channel and 
Tonawanda Harbor, NY 
3. Buffalo Harbor, NY 
4. Cattaraugus Harbor, NY 
5. Cleveland Harbor, OH 
6. Conneaut Harbor, OH 
7. Dunkirk Harbor, NY 
8. Erie Harbor, PA 
9. Fairport Harbor, OH 
10. Huron Harbor, OH 
11. Irondequoit Bay, NY 
12. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 
13. Lorain Harbor, OH 
14. Olcott Harbor, NY 
15. Oswego Harbor, NY 
16. Port Ontario Harbor, NY 
17. Rochester Harbor, NY 
18. Rocky River, OH 
19. Sandusky Harbor, OH 
20. Toledo Harbor, OH 
21. Vermilion Harbor, OH 
22. Environmental Review Guide for 
Operations 
23. Reconnaissance and condition surveys 
24. Other authorized navigation projects 
25. Navigation work under special 
authorization 
26. Sturgeon Point, Evans, NY 
Beach Erosion Control 
27. Maumee Bay State Park, Ohio 
28. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA 
29. Other authorized beach erosion 
control projects 
Page 
20-2 
20-2 
20-3 
20-4 
20-4 
20-5 
20-6 
20-6 
20-7 
20-7 
20-8 
20-8 
20-9 
20-9 
20-10 
20-10 
20-11 
20-11 
20-12 
20-12 
20-13 
20-13 
20-13 
20-13 
20-13 
20-14 
Page 
20-14 
20-14 
20-15 
Flood Control 
30. Mount Morris Lake, NY 
Genesee River 
31. Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, 
OH 
32. Inspection of completed flood 
control projects 
33. National Emergency 
Preparedness 
34. Other authorized flood control 
projects 
35. Flood control work under 
special authorization 
Urban Storm Water Management 
36. Onondaga Storm Water Discharge 
20-15 
20-15 
20-16 
20-16 
20-16 
20-16 
20-17 
Miscellaneous 
37. Project modifications for improvement of the 
environment pursuant to Section 1135, 
Public Law 99-66240 20-17 
Deauthorized projects 
38. Deauthorized Projects 
General Investigations 
39. Surveys 
40. Collection and study of basic data 
41. Preconstruction Engineering 
42. Advance Engineering and Design 
20-18 
20-18 
20-18 
20-18 
20-18 
20-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Navigation 
1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH 
Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth 
of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, 
Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1593 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. For description see pages 1297- 99 
of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed 
project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of 
$5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were 
for construction of access roads, docks, storage and 
handling facilities and dockside dredging. See Table 
20-B for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local 
interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 
1936 and 1970 acts. 
Terminal facilities. There are 16 piers and wharves. 
One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Ten facilities 
are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on 
south side of outer harbor. Eleven terminals have 
railroad connections and six have mechanical handling 
facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for 
existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 
1972, Corps of Engineers.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and 
harbor surveys using government plant and hired labor 
cost $56,538. Environmental activities by contract 
cost $14,000 and by hired labor cost $52,000. Real 
Estate activities cost $10,800. Contract dredging 
downstream of the 5th Street Bridge, initiated in FY 
94, was finalized at a cost of $243,577. Engineering 
and design cost $9,548. Supervision and 
administration cost $38,100. Involvement with 
Ashtabula River Partnership, comprised of local, 
private and government agencies to address 
remediation of contaminated sediments in the lower 
river and Ashtabula River system, and continuing 
investigation for Letter Report regarding construction 
of a new Confined Disposal Facility for outer harbor 
sediment cost $120,500. 
2. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL 
TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY 
AND 
Location. Improvement is essentially that of upper 
13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake 
Erie, Buffalo, NY, to and including Tonawanda 
Harbor, NY. It comprises improvements formerly 
designated by three titles; viz, Lake Erie entrance to 
Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, NY, Black Rock 
Harbor and Channel, NY and Tonawanda Harbor and 
Niagara River, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14832.) 
Previous projects. For details see item 5 and 7, 
page 1970 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1612 
of Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project. For description of existing project 
and Federally owned Black Rock ship lock, see page 
1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of 
guide pier at Black Rock Lock, as authorized by 1935 
act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 
Cost for completed portion of new work is 
$10,457,093. Enlarging of existing 21-foot turning 
basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda 
Inner Harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 
1954 act, was deauthorized by Congress in May 1981, 
and is excluded from foregoing cost. Non-Federal 
costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by 
New York State for construction of Erie Basin and 
protecting breakwater, and construction and extension 
of Bird Island Pier, and by other local interest for 
relocation of utilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing 
legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for 
existing project. Contract for cost-shared recreation 
development at completed projects (Code 713 
program) was executed by the New York State 
Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, 
NY on April 16, 1985, and was approved by the 
20-2

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
Assistant Secretary of the Army and Chief of 
Engineers on May 3, 1985. 
Terminal facilities. Two facilities are along 
upstream end of channel. Below Black Rock Lock and 
at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned 
terminals. There are two State-owned barge canal 
terminals at Tonawanda, NY, and several marine 
service and supply docks for recreational and other 
small craft. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black 
Rock Lock which is private. Ten terminals have 
railroad connections and six mechanical-handling 
facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of 
Engineers.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Operation and care (Black Rock Lock): 
Lock was in operation 283 days and closed for annual 
winter maintenance from January 6, 1995 through 
April 16, 1995. Ordinary maintenance and repair of 
structures and grounds was accomplished throughout 
the year by the U.S. derrickboat McCauley. Total 
costs of $1,791,596 were distributed as follows: 
Operation and care of lock, ordinary maintenance and 
repair and environmental compliance cost $585,500. 
Maintenance of grounds cost $81,200. Real estate 
activities, project condition sediment surveys, and 
support of Water Control Center $93,400. $91,000 
was expended for repairs to the underwater operating 
equipment and dewatering the lock. $19,596 was 
expended for snagging and clearing by the U.S. 
derrickboat McCauley. $159,600 was expended for 
supervision and administration. 
3. BUFFALO HARBOR, NY 
Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of 
Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, 
Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1967 of 
Annual Report for 1915 and page 1606 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. For description see page 1368 of 
Annual Report for 1963. In addition, on December 15, 
1980, OCE authorized the removal of bridge 
abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge. New 
work for completed project cost $18,837,601. 
Estimated non-Federal costs were $9,188,000 for 
deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River 
and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and 
dikes and performing dock-side dredging. See Table 
20-B for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are 27 piers, wharves 
and docks of which five are on the Outer Harbor, nine 
are on the Lackawanna, Union, and Buffalo Ship 
Canals, and thirteen are located along the deep-draft 
section of the Buffalo River. Gateway Metroport, 
Division of Gateway Trade Center, Inc., owns and 
operates for the former Bethlehem Steel Corp. 
wharves at Lackawanna for the receipt and shipment 
of general cargo and bulk commodities. Buildings of 
the former steel plant are utilized for transit and longterm 
storage of cargo as required. The Niagara 
Frontier Transportation Authority owns Terminals A 
and B in the Outer Harbor used for handling general 
cargo. Twenty terminals have railroad connections. 
The city of Buffalo owns a slip on the right bank of 
Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge 
for mooring the city fireboat. Coast Guard facilities 
are at the mouth of Buffalo River along the left bank. 
(See Port Series No. 41, revised 1991, U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, 
condition sediment surveys, water control 
management and real estate activities cost $217,445. 
Repairs to the Bird Island Pier and approximately 75 
l.f. of the south breakwater and 20 l.f of CDF repairs 
by the U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $215,900. 
Environmental activities at Times Beach, by contract 
and hired labor, cost $75,700. Snagging and clearing 
in the Buffalo River by the derrickboat McCauley 
cost $51,900. Engineering and design cost $10,717. 
20-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
4. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, NY 
Location. At mouth of Cattaraugus Creek on south 
shore of Lake Erie about 12 miles northeasterly from 
Dunkirk Harbor, NY and 24 miles southwesterly from 
Buffalo Harbor, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14823.) 
Existing project. For details of the existing project, 
see page 32-4 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction 
was completed in January 1983. Total Federal cost for 
new work was $4,804,060. Total non-Federal cost for 
new work was $2,566,529, excluding $20,000 for 
lands. Existing project was authorized by 1968 River 
and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess.) 
Local cooperation. See page 32-5 of Annual Report 
for 1976 for details of requirements of local 
cooperation. The cash contribution paid was 
$2,566,529. The State of New York executed local 
cooperation agreement in July 1981. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private 
docks for recreational craft and privately owned 
servicing and storage handling facilities for 
recreational and other small craft. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Harbor surveys, real estate activities and 
engineering and design cost $2,038. 
5. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH 
Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of 
Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, NY 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839). 
Previous projects. For details see page 1962, 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1585, Annual 
Report for 1938 
Existing Project. For description of existing project, 
as authorized through the 1966 modification, see page 
1269 of Annual Report for 1967. Further 
improvements in the interest of commercial navigation 
and recreational navigation were authorized in the 
1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL 99-88), at 
a cost not to exceed $36,000,000. The commercial 
navigation portion of the overall project consists of: 
(a) enlarging and deepening to 31 feet LWD the east 
entrance channel; (b) deepening the east basin 
channel to 27 feet LWD; and (c) expanding the 
capacity of Dike Site 14 to contain the polluted 
dredged material resulting from the project. This 
portion of the project is currently on hold as the local 
sponsor has assigned this aspect a lower priority. For 
details of the recreational navigation portion of the 
project, see page 20-3 of Annual Report for 1994. 
The recreational navigation project was also 
authorized by the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (PL 99-662) and the FY 88 Energy and Water 
Appropriations Act (PL 100-202). These acts also 
authorized additional undefined improvements to 
Cleveland Harbor. A portion of the project was 
deauthorized by the Intermodal Surface 
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Estimated 
total Federal cost of the existing project is 
$33,852,100 (Oct.1991) exclusive of undefined, 
inactive and deferred portions of the project. The 
amount of $29,315,100 is for completed work and the 
balance of $4,537,000 is for new work. Estimated 
non-Federal cost is $13,740,000 (Oct. 1991) of which 
$9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and the 
balance of $4,537,000 is required for work authorized 
by PL 99-88, PL 99-662, and PL 100-202. Remaining 
work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act, 
consisting of widening and deepening the right bank 
of Cuyahoga River at the downstream end of Cut 4, is 
considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost 
estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this portion 
is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) $5,000,000. 
Remaining work authorized by 1958 R&H Act, 
consisting of planning and replacement of bridges 
number 19 (E.L.R.R.) and 32 (B. & O.R.R.) and 
widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels, and 
remaining work authorized by the 1960 R&H Act, 
consisting of deepening the remainder of Cuyahoga 
River from bridge number 1 to and including the Old 
River to a depth of 27 feet, has been classified as 
deferred and is also excluded from foregoing 
estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1976) of this 
portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost 
20-4

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
(Oct. 1976) is $21,251,000. The 1989 Energy and 
Water Development Appropriations Act (PL 101-101) 
authorized the Corps to begin a Reconnaissance study 
of the Cuyahoga River, to address the concerns of boat 
traffic congestion and related risks, accidents and 
safety of the public. Preliminary plans were studied to 
alleviate the commercial navigation problem and 
inadequate width and depth, in the Old and Cuyahoga 
Rivers. The cost of this Reconnaissance study was 
$250,000. The Reconnaissance Report recommended 
a feasibility study for one plan which has three 
structural features and the potential for yielding 
commercial (priority) outputs. The non-Federal 
sponsor did not commit to provide its total share of the 
cost of the feasibility phase of the study. Therefore, 
the study was reclassified as "inactive". See Table 
32-B for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. The city of Cleveland has been 
requested to provide assurances regarding items of 
local cooperation required for the construction of the 
new CDF. For details of local cooperation, see page 
32-4 of FY 87 Annual Report. 
Terminal facilities. Fifty-one piers, wharves, and 
docks are situated in the Port of Cleveland. Eleven are 
located in the east and west basins of the outer harbor; 
7 along the banks of the Old River and 17 and 16 
along the right and left banks of the Cuyahoga river, 
respectively. Twenty-two terminals have both railroad 
connections and mechanical-handling facilities. The 
Corps owns a wharf at the foot of East 9th Street. The 
city of Cleveland owns and operates a wharf for 
mooring the city fireboat. U.S. Coast Guard vessels 
are moored east of the foot of 9th Street in the east 
basin. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1989, U.S. 
Army Corps of Engineers.) , 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, 
condition sediment surveys, environmental activities, 
and real estate activities cost $223,600. Repairs to 
approximately 275 1.f of east arrowhead and the east 
breakwater, and minor repairs to the CDF, using the 
derrickboat Simonsen cost $700,400. Snagging and 
clearing cost $187,800. Approximately 206,000 cubic 
yards of shoaled material were removed from the 
Maumee Bay, by contract, cost $532,556. 
Approximately 712,000 cubic yards of shoaled 
material were removed from the Maumee River, by 
contract, cost $1,545,677. Dredging contract cost 
paid in FY 95 was $1,615,740 with balance to be paid 
in FY 96. Related engineering and design cost 
$130,460. Modifications to Dike 14 cost $53,900. 
Costs for the new CDF were $81,000. Supervision 
and administration cost $224,608. 
6. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH 
Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at 
mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from 
Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1964, 
Annual Report for 1915. 
Existing project. For description see page 1274 of 
Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work 
for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. 
See page 1274, Annual Report for 1967, for complete 
description of project modification authorized by 
1966 R&H Act. Authorization of this modification 
was continued by the 1990 Water Resources 
Development Act. Estimated cost (1970) for this 
modification is $717,000. For completed work, 
non-Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside 
dredging and removal of existing dolphins. Estimated 
non-Federal cost of $2,877,000 (1970) includes cash 
contribution of $717,000 and the remainder is for 
construction of service facilities for the 1966 project 
modification. See Table 20-B for authorizing 
legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for 
completed portion of project. See page 32-6 of 
Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of local 
cooperation for project modification as authorized by 
the River and Harbor Act of 1966. 
Terminal facilities. There are seven piers and 
wharves. Six are privately owned and operated and 
located in inner harbor. Remaining facility is city 
owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals 
have railroad connections and four 
20-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
mechanical-handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 
42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: $15,585 was expended for harbor 
surveys. Economic studies, real estate and supervision 
and administration cost $3,207. Engineering and 
design cost $16,873. $964,458 was expended to repair 
approximately 350 1.f of the west breakwater using 
the U.S. derrickboat McCauley. 
7. DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY 
Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 37 miles 
southwesterly from Buffalo, NY (See NOAA Nautical 
Chart 14823.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1966 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1604 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
portion of existing project see page 32-8 of Annual 
Report for 1976. For description of small boat harbor 
project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood 
Control Act of 1965, see page 32-8 of Annual Report 
for 1978. Actual costs for completed work are 
$3,010,024. Actual non-Federal costs are $1,961,000. 
See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private 
docks for recreational craft and privately owned 
servicing and storage handling facilities for 
recreational and other small craft. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $23,898. $261,093 
was expended to dredge 25,451 cubic yards of shoaled 
material. Environmental testing in support of dredging 
cost $3,659. Real estate activities cost $825. 
Engineering and design cost $24,210. $27,386 was 
expended to repair 20 1.f of the west end breakwater 
using the derrickboat McCauley. $18,213 was 
expended for supervision and administration. 
8. ERIE HARBOR, PA 
Location. On southerly side of bay formed by 
Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 
78 miles westerly from Buffalo, NY. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14835.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1965 of 
Annual Report for 1915 and page 1600 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing projects. For description see pages 
1363-64 of Annual Report for 1963. The FY 93 
Appropriations Act (PL102-377) authorized the 
planning, design and dredging of an access channel 
and berthing area. Entire project modification 
authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing 
for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to 
Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of 
harbor, was deauthorized by Congress in August 
1977. Actual costs for new work for completed 
portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of 
north pier portion, authorized by 1899 Act was 
deauthorized in November 1981. A portion of work 
authorized by 1960 Act, deepening strips adjacent to 
north and south piers, was deauthorized in August 
1982. Non- Federal costs for completed work were 
$51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip 
adjacent thereto. See Table 20-B for authorizing 
legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of 
which 12 are privately owned and operated. Erie 
International Marine Terminal No. 1 owned by Port 
Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on 
southside of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard 
facilities are on north side. Two offshore oil docks are 
on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railroad 
connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (See port Series No. 42, revised 1972, 
Corps of Engineers.) 
20-6

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
Operations and result during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $29,134. 
Environmental activities cost $3,567. Real estate 
activity, breakwater inspections and miscellaneous 
dredging cost $7,169. Engineering and design cost 
$7,884. Supervision and administration cost $4,162. 
Completion of design memorandum and initiation of 
plans and specifications regarding construction of an 
access channel and berthing area for the vessel 
Niagara cost $467,923. 
9. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH 
Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of 
Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1590 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. For description of existing project 
as authorized through the 1960 modifications, see page 
1526 of Annual Report for 1962; for description of 
small boat harbor as authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 
Flood Control Act, see page 32-10 of Annual Report 
for 1977. Authorization of this modification was 
continued by the 1990 Water Resources Development 
Act. Estimated total Federal cost of new work is 
$4,931,000 (Oct. 1980) of which $2,591,000 is actual 
cost for completed portion of project and the balance 
of $2,340,000 is for proposed work authorized by See. 
201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act, which is deferred. 
Entire project modification authorized by 1960 River 
and Harbor Act, providing for deepening lake 
approach channel, 800-foot wide channel through 
outer harbor and channel in Grand River, and 
enlargement of turning basin, is classified inactive and 
is excluded from foregoing cost. This authorization 
was also continued by the 1990 Water Resources 
Development Act. Estimated Federal cost of this 
modification is $7,870,000 (Mar. 1991). Estimated 
non-Federal cost is $4,991,000, of which $101,000 
was for bulkheads and dockside dredging for 
completed portion of project and $2,560,000 which 
includes cash contribution of $2,330,000, is for work 
authorized by Sec. 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act. 
For the inactive 1960 project modification, estimated 
non-Federal cost of $26,400,000 (Mar. 1991) is for 
lands, relocations, utility changes, dock dredging and 
bulkhead modifications. See Table 20-B for 
authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1976 
Annual Report regarding assurances of local 
cooperation for work authorized by R&H Acts of 
1927 and 1960 and page 32-11 of 1977 Annual 
Report for requirements of local cooperation for work 
authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. 
Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all 
along banks of Grand River. One facility is owned by 
Coast Guard. Nine terminals have railroad 
connections and ten mechanical-handling facilities. 
Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. 
(See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of 
Engineers.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $21,676. Real 
estate and environmental activity cost $480. 
Engineering and design cost $8,038. Finalization of 
the FY 94 dredging contract cost $19,071. 
Supervision and administration cost $2,021. 
10. HURON HARBOR, OH 
Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of 
Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, 
Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14843.) 
Previous project. For details, see page 1961 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1576 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. For description, see page 1347 of 
Annual Report for 1963 and page 32-12 of Annual 
Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of 
existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of 
detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H Act 
was deauthorized January 1, 1990. Non-Federal costs 
of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 
for dockside dredging of areas between Federal 
20-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 20-B 
for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Six privately owned wharves 
and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and 
remainder along right bank. Four terminals have 
railroad connections and four mechanical-handling 
facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for 
existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 
1972, Corps of Engineers.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $35,872. 
Environmental assessments, real estate activity, and 
economic studies cost $32,098. Approximately 50 1.f. 
of the east breakwater was repaired using the U.S. 
derrickboat Simonsen at a cost of $112,835. 
Finalization of the FY 94 dredging contract cost 
$9,076. Engineering and design cost $9,763. 
Supervision and administration cost $23,456. 
11. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY 
Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, 4 miles 
east of Rochester, NY at mouth of Irondequoit Creek, 
Monroe County, NY (See NOAA Nautical Charts 
14804 and 14815). 
Existing project. For details of existing project, see 
page 32-7 of Annual Report for FY 87. Total estimated 
project cost is $15,363,000 (Oct. 1984) including 
$3,582,000 Federal (which includes the COE 
$3,536,000 and the USCG $46,000) and $11,781,000 
non-Federal, including a cash contribution of 
$2,661,000, lands and damages $290,000 and the cost 
of a movable highway bridge $8,830,000. Existing 
project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act 
(H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2d sess.). 
Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a Local 
Cooperation Agreement with New York State, 
executed April 20, 1983. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private 
docks for recreational craft and privately owned 
servicing and storage handling facilities for 
recreational and other small craft. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Engineering and design cost $148. 
Harbor surveys cost $2,642. 
12. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY 
Location. Little Sodus Bay, on south shore of Lake 
Ontario, 15 miles west of Oswego, NY (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14803.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1628 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. For description see page 1378 of 
Annual Report for 1958. New work for completed 
project cost $69,066. Non-Federal costs of $6,000 
were incurred for channel dredging. See Table 20-B 
for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. Not required. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private 
docks for recreational craft and privately owned 
servicing and storage handling facilities for 
recreational and other small craft. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $30,984. Costs to 
perform design analysis, plans and specifications and 
subsurface investigation for the east breakwater were 
$51,237. $216,664 was expended to finalize the FY 
94 dredging contract. Approximately 20,000 cubic 
yards of material were removed. Engineering and 
design cost $6,252. Environmental and real estate 
activities cost $7,640. Supervision and administration 
cost $49,183. 
20-8

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
13. LORAIN HARBOR, OH 
Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of 
Black River, 25 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) 
Previous projects. For details, see page 1961 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1580 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. For description see pages 1319-22 
of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of new work 
is $20,475,000. Deepening and widening remainder of 
Black River Channel at Cut 1 and construction of bank 
stabilization, authorized by 1960 Act and modified by 
1965 Act was deauthorized January 1, 1990. A portion 
of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15-to-25 
foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West 
piers were also deauthorized January 1, 1990. Total 
non-Federal cost is $3,000 contributed by local 
interests towards construction of west shorearm. See 
Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The Water 
Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (PL 
99-662) authorized construction of commercial 
navigation improvements consisting of two bend cuts 
on the Black River to widen and straighten the channel 
between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and 
the 21st Street Bridge. These cuts are to be excavated 
to the existing channel depth of 27 feet. The 
authorized plan also includes widening the Upper 
Turning Basin at the existing depth of 21 feet. 
Estimated costs for this work are $2,290,000 Federal 
and $1,510,000 non-Federal (Oct. 1989). This portion 
of the project has been classified deferred. On March 
12, 1986, the Chief of Engineers under authority of 
Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as 
amended, authorized construction of a small boat 
harbor which was completed in July 1987. The project 
consists of a 225-foot detached rubblemound 
breakwater and an 800-foot long rubblemound 
breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in 
the east basin of the outer harbor. Construction costs 
for this project, including supervision and 
administration, were $775,025 Federal and $775,025 
non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. For completed work, local 
interests contributed $3,000. Work authorized by 
1960 Act (and modified by 1965 Act) is deauthorized. 
All other conditions fully complied with. On March 
25, 1986, the city of Lorain, Ohio signed the Local 
Cooperation Agreement (LCA), for the Section 107 
project. For details see page 32-7 of Annual Report 
for 1986. For details of LCA for deferred project 
authorized by the 1986 WRDA, see page 32-9 of 
Annual Report for FY 87. 
Terminal facilities. There are 23 piers and 
wharves, of which three are on outer harbor and 
remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are 
owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad 
connections and 15 mechanical-handling facilities. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, 
Corps of Engineers.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: In-house engineering and design costs to 
finalize Advance Engineering and Design were 
$4,444. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $66,537. 
Environmental activities and economic studies cost 
$17,008. Real estate activity cost $4,350. 
Approximately 130 l.f of west breakwater and CDF 
repairs were completed using the U.S. derrickboat 
Simonsen at a cost of $356,443. Plans and 
specifications for the Phase II repairs to the Lorain 
Lighthouse cost $137,226. $987,565 was expended 
for contract dredging to remove approximately 
179,540 cubic yards of shoaled material. Engineering 
and design cost $47,004. Supervision and 
administration cost $68,088. 
14. OLCOTT HARBOR, NY 
Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth 
of Eighteen Mile Creek, about 18 miles east of mouth 
of Niagara River and 63 miles by water west of 
Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1971 of 
Annual Report for 1915 and page 1621 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
20-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Existing project. For description, see page 1555 of 
Annual Report for 1962. Cost of new work for 
completed project was $1,500 exclusive of amount 
expended on previous projects, all of which was 
contributed by local interests. See Table 20-B for 
authorizing legislation. The authorized modification to 
the existing project consists of breakwaters to provide 
optimum harbor protection, a stone jetty and 
recreational fishing facilities including a foot bridge, 
walkways and guardrail, access facilities, sanitary 
facilities and parking areas. The estimated cost of the 
authorized modification is $17,300,000 (Oct. 1991) of 
which $8,860,000 is Federal and $8,440,000 is 
non-Federal. Modification of the existing project was 
authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development 
Act (WRDA) (PL 99-662) and is classified deferred. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for 
completed project. Local interests contributed $1,500. 
Modifications authorized by the 1986 WRDA will 
require local interests to pay 50% of project cost 
including lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredge 
disposal areas. They are also responsible for 
construction of necessary docks and berthing spaces, 
construction of launching ramp, parking areas, sanitary 
facilities, and necessary access roads. After 
construction, non-Federal responsibilities would 
include fishing facility maintenance, except for the 
aids to navigation. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private 
docks for recreational craft and privately owned 
servicing and storage handling facilities for 
recreational and other small craft. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $8,968. 
Environmental compliance assessments and related 
activities cost $4,784. Real estate activity cost $4,125. 
Supervision and administration cost $232. 
15. OSWEGO HARBOR, NY 
Locations. On South shore of Lake Ontario, at 
mouth of Oswego river, 59 miles easterly from 
Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14813.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1630 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. For description see pages 
1383-84 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed 
portion of project cost $7,242,039 and non-Federal 
costs for completed work were $4,440,000 for lands, 
dockside dredging, construction of terminal wharves, 
and cargo handling facilities. Deepening a 200-foot 
wide strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego 
River, remaining feature of work authorized by the 
1930 Act, was deauthorized January 1, 1990. 
Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip along 
harbor line in west outer harbor, remaining feature of 
work authorized by 1940 Act, was deauthorized in 
May 1981. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are seven piers and 
wharves in the harbor and along the river channel. 
The Port of Oswego owns and operates a general 
cargo terminal at the mouth of the Oswego River. The 
Port Authority also operates a grain elevator west of 
the mouth of the river. The U.S. Coast Guard moors 
patrol and environmental research vessels west of the 
mouth of the river. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Environmental activities cost $7,018. 
Supervision and administration cost $1,962. Harbor 
surveys cost $8,469. 
16. PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, NY 
Location. On southeasterly end of Lake Ontario, 
19 miles northeasterly of Oswego, NY and 32 miles 
southerly of Sackets Harbor, NY. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14803.) 
Previous projects. Adopted by the River and 
Harbor Act July 4, 1836. Only information available 
is the index to the report of the Chief of Engineers. 
20-10

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
Existing project. For description see page 32-17 of 
Annual Report for 1978 and page 32-16 of Annual 
report for 1976. Non-Federal cost for new work was 
$1,467,132 including cash contribution of $1,431,507. 
Existing project was authorized by the River and 
Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc 446, 78th 
Cong., 2d sess.). 
Local cooperation. See page 32-16 of Annual 
Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local 
cooperation. Assurances were received from the New 
York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic 
Preservation. The LCA was executed on June 24, 
1986. 
Terminal facilities. The only commercial navigation 
at Port Ontario is charter boat fishing. Terminal 
facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. 
Actual construction of the project was completed in 
October 1987. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Balancing of Federal and non-Federal costs 
resulted in a net Federal credit of $20,814 and a nonfederal 
expenditure of $20,814. Maintenance: Harbor 
surveys cost $1,402. 
17. ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY 
Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth 
of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, 
NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1471 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1623 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. For description see page 1556 of 
Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for 
completed project is $2,191,514. Non-Federal costs 
are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 1960 Act, for 
lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, 
relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside 
dredging, structure modifications, and replacement of 
Baltimore & Ohio coal loader. See Table 20-B for 
authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. Complied with except provision 
for replacement of coal loading facility as required by 
River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. 
Terminal facilities. There are 3 docks at Rochester 
Harbor. The city of Rochester owns an 830-foot long 
wharf at the entrance to the Genesee River. Three 
storage buildings at the terminal, formerly used as 
transit sheds, have approximately 100,000 square feet 
of storage space. Approximately 3 acres of open 
storage area is located at the upper end of the facility. 
The facility has not been used for handling cargo for 
over 10 years. The U.S. Coast Guard moors search 
and rescue vessels at the mouth of the Genesee River. 
Another private facility is located 1.6 miles above the 
Stutson Street Bridge. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $99,635. 
Environmental testing, by contract cost $9,780. Other 
environmental work cost $43,701. Economic studies 
and real estate cost $5,590. Removal of 233,314 
cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, from the 
Genesee River and entrance channel cost $749,942. 
Engineering and design cost $29,164. Supervision 
and administration cost $61,147. 
18. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OH 
Location. At mouth of Rocky River which empties 
into Lake Erie 7 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) 
Existing project. For description see page 1329 of 
Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost for completed 
project was $343,494 and non-Federal cost was a cash 
contribution of $249,346. See Table 20-B for 
authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local 
interests contributed $249,346 for new work. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private 
docks for recreational craft and privately-owned 
servicing and storage handling facilities for 
recreational and other small craft. 
20-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $16,517. 
Environmental activities and real estate cost $3,054. 
$270,777 was expended to remove 32,121 cubic yards 
of material by contract. Engineering and design cost 
$16,924. supervision and administration cost $44,186. 
19. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH 
Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, in 
southeastern portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles 
westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical 
Chart 14845.) 
Previous project. For description see pages 1511-12 
of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work 
for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding 
$325,000 contributed by local interests. Non-Federal 
costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000, 
including $325,000 cash contribution and the 
remaining $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent 
to deepening channels authorized by 1960 Act. See 
Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local 
interests contributed $325,000 for new work. 
Terminal facilities. Fourteen piers and wharves, 
three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock 
channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research 
and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately 
owned used for mooring fishing boats and recreational 
craft and for ferry service. Five terminals have railroad 
connections and five mechanical-handling facilities. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, 
Corps of Engineers.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $154,548. 
Environmental activities, economic studies, and real 
estate cost $17,642. $441,103 was expended to 
finalize the FY 94 dredging contract. Removal of 
350,000 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, 
cost $1,088,998. Engineering and design cost 
$35,506. Supervision and administration cost $104,906. 
20. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH 
Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee 
River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. 
Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and 
empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at the westerly end 
of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1959 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1565 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. For description of existing 
project see pages 32-18 and -19 of Annual Report for 
1978. Cost of completed existing project was 
$15,567,147. See table 20-B for authorizing 
legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Thirty-five piers, wharves and 
docks are located in the Port of Toledo. Seven are 
located on Maumee river; and 28 are equally divided 
along the right and left banks of the lower 7 miles of 
the Maumee river. The Toledo-Lucas County Port 
Authority Facility No. 1 Wharf handles conventional 
and containerized general cargo as well as an 
increasing amount of miscellaneous bulk materials. 
Fifteen of the terminals have railroad connections and 
mechanical handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 
44, revised 1989, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Harbor surveys and inspections cost 
$354,474. $97,895 was expended for in-house 
environmental and economic studies $28,113 was 
expended for economic studies and biological testing 
by contract. Real estate cost $8,404. Costs to 
continue the Long-Term Management Strategy were 
$464,650. CDF maintenance and repairs by contract 
cost $185,667. In-house costs for repairs to the 
existing CDF, pipeline, and pump-out platform, 
including engineering and design cost $113,670. 
Finalization of the FY 94 dredging contract for the 
Maumee River channel cost $967,714. Removal of 
20-12

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
205,979 cubic yards of shoaled material from the 
Maumee Bay Channel cost $532,556. Removal of 
712,043 cubic yards of shoaled material from the 
Maumee River Channel cost $1,498,400; contract to 
be finalized in FY 96. Engineering and design related 
to dredging cost $80,072. Supervision and 
administration cost $173,566. 
21. VERMILION HARBOR, OH 
Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of 
Vermilion River, 37 miles westerly from Cleveland, 
Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) 
Existing project. For description of existing project 
see pages 32-17 and 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. 
Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project 
was $1,156,118. Estimated non-Federal cost for new 
work is $754,679 including cash contribution of 
$740,679 and remainder for relocation of submarine 
cable and construction of public wharf See Table 20- 
B for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local 
interests contributed $740,679. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private 
docks for recreational craft and privately owned 
servicing and storage handling facilities for 
recreational and other small craft. A reconnaissance 
study to alleviate the ice-jam and free-flow flooding of 
the river was completed in 1986 at a cost of $180,000. 
The proposed project was an ice-retention structure. 
The non-Federal sponsor did not commit to provide its 
total share of the cost of the feasibility study; the 
project was therefore reclassified as "inactive". 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $16,995. 
Environmental activities cost $7,717. Removal of 
30,000 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract 
cost $137,000. Engineering and design cost $11,713. 
Supervision and administration cost $18,078. 
22. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW GUIDE FOR 
OPERATIONS 
$35,926 was expended to complete environmental 
compliance assessments and associated corrective 
action plans for the Buffalo District. 
23. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION 
SURVEYS 
Condition surveys were performed by the Buffalo 
District at a cost of $135,734. Miscellaneous costs 
and real estate costs were $4,271. Remaining costs 
for reconnaissance and condition surveys are reported 
in individual project writeups. 
Project 
Barcelona, NY 
Great Sodus, NY 
Niagara River, NY 
Oak Orchard, NY 
Ogdensburg, NY 
Port Clinton 
Wilson, NY 
West Harbor, NY 
Date of 
Survey 
Aug 1995 
Sep 1995 
Oct-Nov 1995 
Jun 1995 
Sep 1995 
Aug 1995 
Aug 1995 
Jul1995 
24. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION 
PROJECTS 
See Table 20-C. 
25. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
See Table 20-G. 
Investigation and removal of sunken vessels and 
other obstructions to navigation under authority of 
Section 19 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899. 
Balancing of the account for the removal of sunken 
Barge No. 45, pinned against the upstream face of the 
Peace Bridge Pier 4, on the Niagara River resulted in 
an expenditure of $3,174. 
20-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
26. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, NY 
Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 17 miles 
southwest of Buffalo, NY and 22 miles northeast of 
Dunkirk, NY (See Geological Survey map of Angola, 
NY.) 
Existing project. For description of existing project, 
see page 20-11 of Annual Report for FY 91. Federal 
project cost is $1,460,000. Non-Federal project cost is 
$1,475,000. In addition, the local sponsor provided 
associated costs for upland development of 
$1,000,000. 
Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a 
properly executed Local Cooperation Agreement with 
the Town of Evans, NY, signed October 26, 1987. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Balancing Federal and non-Federal shares 
resulted in a net Federal expenditure of $53,955 and a 
non-Federal credit of $53,955. Maintenance: Cost to 
complete study on sand by-passing procedures was 
$223. Reimbursement to the Town of Evans, NY, for 
Federal share of maintenance dredging cost $10,051.. 
Beach Erosion Control 
27. MAUMEE BAY STATE PARK, OH 
Location. Maumee Bay State Park is located in 
Lucas County, OH approximately 5 miles east of 
Toledo. The 1,855 acre park has 11,000 feet of 
shoreline along the southerly end of Maumee Bay 
(Lake Erie). (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, 
Oregon, OH.) 
Existing project. For description of existing project, 
see page 20-12 of Annual Report for FY 1991 and 
page 20-11 of Annual Report for FY 92. 
Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation 
see page 32-14 of FY 87 Annual Report. A Local 
Cooperation Agreement was negotiated with the local 
sponsor (ONDR) and executed August 8, 1990 by the 
Assistant Secretary of the Army. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Balancing Federal and non-Federal shares 
resulted in a net Federal credit of $4,412 and a non- 
Federal expenditure of $4,412. 
28. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA 
Location. At Erie, Pa., on south shore of Lake Erie, 
78 miles southwest of Buffalo, NY and 102 miles 
east-northeast of Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA 
Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835.) 
Existing project. For description of completed 
portion of existing project see page 1393 of Annual 
Report for 1963. For details of project authorized by 
the 1974 Water Resources Development Act 
(WRDA), 1976 WRDA and 1986 WRDA, see page 
32-14 of Annual Report for FY 87. Actual Federal 
cost for the authorized beach nourishment project 
modifications through FY 92 is $16,879,000 which 
includes $5,646,000 for completed work authorized 
by the 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act 
and $11,233,000 for completed work authorized by 
the 1976 WRD Act. Actual non-Federal cost for the 
authorized project and modifications through FY 92 
is $8,798,000 which includes $3,983,000 for 
completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H 
Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $4,815,000 for 
completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. 
Beach nourishment as authorized by the 1976 WRDA 
was completed in FY 91. The estimated Federal cost 
(Oct. 1995) for the 55 breakwater project is 
$63,035,000. This estimate includes $13,435,000 for 
the initial construction and $49,600,000 for 50 years 
of post-construction beach nourishment. The 
estimated non-Federal cost (Oct 1995) for the 
breakwater project is also $63,035,000. See Table 32- 
B for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for 
completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 
R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act. An agreement 
between the United States of America and the 
20-14

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through the 
Department of Environmental Resources was entered 
into on February 21, 1979 for the annual nourishment 
which was extended by the 1976 WRD Act. A Local 
Cooperation Agreement between the United Stated of 
America and the local sponsor for construction of the 
58 breakwater project was executed by the Secretary 
of the Army on June 22, 1989. See page 20-10 of 
Annual Report for FY 89 for details of local 
cooperation. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Annual nourishment for a fifty-year period, 
beginning in FY 93, continued in FY 95 for the third 
year of this fifty-year period. Federal expenditures 
were $349,820 for the nourishment contract, $16,910 
for contract supervision and administration and 
$61,566 for in-house engineering and design. Non- 
Federal costs were $349,820 for the nourishment 
contract, $16,950 for contract supervision and 
administration, $59,011 for in-house engineering and 
design and a credit of $678 toward initial construction. 
29. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
See Table 20-D. 
Flood Control 
30. MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, NY 
Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles 
above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of 
Rochester, NY. Reservoir is in Livingston and 
Wyoming Counties, NY (See ecological Survey maps 
of Nunda and Portage, NY). 
Existing project. For description of existing 
project, as authorized by 1944 Flood control Act, see 
page 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New work for 
completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition, 
$5,000 contributed funds were expended for new 
work. 
Local cooperation. None required. Local interests 
contributed $5,000 for new work. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of 
dam, reservoir and service facilities, condition and 
operation studies, real estate activities and 
miscellaneous reports, were accomplished by hired 
labor at a cost of $818,490. $123,451 was expended 
for the U.S. Geological Survey and National Weather 
Service reporting and hydroclimatic network. 
Operation of the Water Control Center cost $172,018. 
$119,966 was expended to continue converting an 
existing building to a Visitor Center. Finalization of 
the FY 94 electrical contract cost $62,524. Related 
engineering and design cost $15,789. Debris 
removal, by contract, cost $189,355. Related 
engineering and design cost $26,792. Removal of 
underground storage tanks, by contact, cost $8,000. 
Finalization of the FY 94 elevator repair contract 
resulted in a credit of $2,255. $45,292 was expended 
to continue replacement of the gallery stairs. $19,379 
was expended for an A/E contract for an observation 
deck. Funds in the amount of $43,371 were expended 
to facilitate compliance with local, state, and federal 
laws and regulations. In-house engineering and 
design cost $196,132. Supervision and administration 
cost $212,722. 
31. RENO BEACH-HOWARD 
FARMS AREA, OH 
Location. Area is located in Lucas County, on the 
south shore of Lake Erie about 15 miles east of 
Toledo, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey map for 
Reno Beach and Metzger Marsh, OH.) 
Existing project. For description of existing 
project, see page 20-14 of Annual Report for 1991. 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation 
Agreement (LCA) was executed with the local 
Sponsor on July 22, 1988 and by the Assistant 
Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on September 
30, 1988. Availability of lands, easements, and rightsof-
way was received on June 5, 1990 from the local 
sponsors. Discussions continue with the local 
sponsors on credit for LERRD's based on independent 
appraisals and the amount of cash contribution. 
20-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Construction is 100% complete. Non-Federal 
costs were $7,865 for continued investigation 
regarding resolution of real estate and associated costs. 
32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
Inspection of completed flood control works for 
compliance with Federal requirements were made 
during the period at a cost of $168,041. This includes 
updating the hydraulics and hydrology of various local 
flood control projects. Total cost to September 30, 
1995 is $2,394,201. 
33. NATIONAL EMERGENCY 
PREPAREDNESS 
FY 95 costs were $101,986. 
34. OTHER AUTHORIZED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
See Table 20-E. 
35. FLOOD CONTROL WORK 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
UNDER 
KEUKA LAKE, PENN YAN, NY 
Location. Keuka Lake is located in the southwestern 
part of New York State in the Oswego River Basin 
between Canandaigua Lake and Seneca Lake in the 
village of Penn Yan in Yates County. (See U.S. 
Geological Survey Map, Penn Yan, NY.) 
Existing Project. Project was approved for 
construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to 
Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as 
amended, on January 25, 1991. The recommended 
plan of improvement consists of removal of an existing 
earthen and masonry dam located just upstream of the 
Main Street Bridge. In order to provide additional 
capacity and to aid in regulating lake levels, additional 
slide gates will be constructed in its place. The project 
will consist of a sheetpile structure with three slide 
gates, each 7 feet high and 6 feet wide. The new 
control structure will tie into the existing races 
located on each side of the stream. The operational 
policy will be to make releases through the dam to 
1,000 CFS or the control structure's capacity, 
whichever is less. This policy will not induce 
additional adverse downstream flood impacts. Total 
Federal cost of the project is $369,800. Total non- 
Federal cost is $123,200. 
Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation 
Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, New 
York State Department of Environmental 
Conservation, on October 11, 1991. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: FY 95 Federal costs were $1,688 for real 
estate activities. A credit, due to account balancing, 
of $1,708 for contract supervision and administration 
and $5,371 for in-house engineering effort. Non- 
Federal costs were $33,118 for real estate activities, 
$1,708 for contract supervision and administration, a 
credit, due to account balancing of $1,208 for inhouse 
engineering effort, and a refund to the local 
sponsor of $34,805. 
Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (Public 
Law 89, 84th Congress, as amended by Sec. 206 of 
Flood Control Act of 1962). 
FY 95 costs for the Disaster Preparedness Program 
were $379,553. Costs to support Emergency 
Operations totaled $123,767 for activities related to 
Winter and Spring flood fighting in Central and 
Northern New York and Northern Ohio. These 
activities included flood reconnaissance, liaison 
activities and providing technical advice to local 
response agencies in flood flight operations. Program 
activities included in-house program administration, 
project inspection activities and the purchase and 
transportation of flood protection materials. FY 95 
costs for the Emergency Rehabilitation Program 
resulted in a Federal credit of $41,090 and a non- 
Federal expenditure of $1,090. This is a result of 
20-16

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
balancing the Euclid Creek, Cleveland, OH project. 
Advance Measures Self-help Assistance resulted in a 
credit of $1,054. 
SWAN CREEK, TOLEDO, OH 
Location. Swan Creek is located at Toledo, Ohio, at 
the westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from 
Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847). 
Existing Project. Project was approved for 
construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to 
Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as 
amended, on May 15, 1991. The project provides for 
construction of approximately 3,100 feet of a 
combination levee and floodwall system along the left 
bank of Swan Creek, extending from the Detroit 
Avenue Bridge, downstream to the South Avenue 
Bridge. In addition, a 540-foot long section of the 
Creek will be relocated about 75 feet. Total estimated 
Federal cost of the project is $1,950,000. Total 
estimated non-Federal cost is $650,000. 
Local Cooperation. The Local Cooperation 
Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, the 
City of Toledo, on August 30, 1991 and requires the 
local sponsor to provide all lands, easements, rightsof-
way, including suitable borrow and dredged 
material disposal areas and relocations and make 
contributions up to 25% of the total project cost. 
Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New 
Work: FY 95 Federal costs were $37 for land 
acquisition, $60,209 for in-house engineering and 
design effort, $1,123,777 for construction contract and 
$194,391 for contract supervision and administration. 
Non-Federal costs were $188 for land acquisition, 
$15,394 for in-house engineering effort, $367,926 for 
construction contract and $63,762 for contract 
supervision and administration. 
URBAN STORM WATER MANAGEMENT 
36. ONONDAGA 
DISCHARGE, NY 
STORM WATER 
Location. Onondaga Lake is located in Central 
New York State, northwest of the city of Syracuse, 
within the Oswego River Basin, which is tributary to 
Lake Ontario. It is also part of the New York State 
Barge Canal System. (See Geological Survey map of 
Syracuse, NY.) 
Existing Project. Existing project is authorized 
under Section 307 of the Waters Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-580) and will 
demonstrate the effectiveness of using swirl 
concentrator system technology for combined Sewer 
Overflow abatement at Hiawatha Boulevard to 
improve water quality in Onondaga Lake. The project 
has three separate components: interceptor sewers; 
a treatment and storage facility; and outfall pipe and 
force main which will be designed and constructed by 
others. Federal cost will $4,000,000. Non-Federal 
cost is estimated to be $3,300,000. 
Local Cooperation. The project will be costshared 
75% Federal, 25% non-Federal up to the 
maximum Federal contribution ($4,000,000). 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: FY 95 costs were $600 for real estate 
activities and $59,692 for in-house engineering effort. 
MISCELLANEOUS 
37. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR 
IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1135, PUBLIC LAW 
99-66240. 
Cleveland Harbor (Fish Habitat), OH - Costs of $206 
for preauthorization studies. 
Coordination Account Funds - Costs of $1,826 for 
preauthorization studies. 
20-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
38. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
See Table 20-I. 
GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
39. SURVEYS 
During FY 95, $478,129 was expended for surveys. 
These costs are shown below: 
Navigation Studies $ 2,938' 
Flood Damage Prevention Studies 121,954 
Shoreline Protection Studies 64,385 
Special Studies 122,151 
Miscellaneous Investigations 94,554 
Coordination Studies 72,1472 
'Does not include $46,028 contributed funds. 2Does 
not include $78,498 contributed funds. 
40. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC 
DATA 
During the period, costs of $209,733 were incurred 
in connection with International Water Studies under 
the General Investigations appropriation and $782,120 
incurred under the Operations and Maintenance 
appropriation for a total cost of $991,853. Flood plain 
management services were performed during the year 
at a cost of $217,046. During the year, flood hazard 
elevation studies were performed for Breakneck 
Creek, NY, East Branch of Eighteen Mile Creek, NY, 
East Syracuse, NY, Sardinia, NY and Skaneateles 
Creek, NY. The results of these studies will enable 
local officials to encourage and enforce prudent use of 
the identified flood plains. Also hundreds of technical 
assistance requests regarding flood plain matters were 
completed during the year responding to individuals, 
corporations, real estate companies, insurance agents, 
engineering firms and local agencies. Costs for 
General Hydrologic Studies were $1,856. 
41. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND 
DESIGN (NOT FULLY AUTHORIZED) 
FY 95 Federal costs were $135,624 for PED effort 
on the Onondaga Lake, NY demonstration project. 
These demonstration projects will be constructed by 
others. Non-Federal costs were $55,586 for in-house 
engineering effort. 
42. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
Costs during the period were $8,176 for Advance 
Engineering and Design projects. For details of 
individual projects, see sections 14 and 46 in text. 
ERIE COUNTY SEWER DISTRICT NO. 5, 
SLUDGE TREATMENT FACILITY, 
AMHERST, NY 
Section 219 of WRDA 1992 authorized the Corps 
to provide technical and engineering services to Erie 
County Sewer District No. 5 for the 
installation/integration of a sludge treatment process 
into the existing wastewater treatment facility located 
in Amherst, NY. The cost sharing required under this 
Section is 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal and will 
be accomplished by an A/E contract as required in 
Section 219. $3,731 has been expended during FY 
95 for coordinating the agreement with the locals. 
20-18

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept 30, 1995 
Project 
1. Ashtabula 
Harbor, OH 
2. Black Rock 
Channel and 
Tonawanda 
Harbor, NY 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib.Funds) 
3. Buffalo 
Harbor, NY 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
542,500 
599,355 
3,567,500 
3,664,062 
2,089,000 
1,900,758 
1,082,762 
987,569 
1,382,503 
1,348,051 
505,178 
645,803 
981,850 
876,691 
1,450,400 
1,432,794 
1,095,750 
1,101,812 
340,138 
545,063 
1,805,000 
1,791,596 
510,000 
571,662 
12,805,3391 
12,805,339' 
16,100,175 
16,420,411 
6,077,000 
6,077,000 
11,135,1202 
11,135,1202 
49,211,3883 
49,114,9283 
620,000 
620,000 
23,115,1874 
23,1 5,1874 
61,638,6935 
61,619,0315 
295,457 
295,457 
20-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept 30, 1995 
Project 
4. Cattaraugus 
Harbor, NY 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib.Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
5. Cleveland 
Harbor, OH 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
250,000 
42,185 
5,678,500 
5,732,808 
1,351,000 
325,676 
484,000 
728,664 
3,201,274 
3,359,135 
-81,000 
22,342 
3,280,250 
3,429,017 
- -267,822 
735,179 22,323 
3,351,000 
3,217,508 
150,000 
119,360 
36,300,2996 
36,300,0496 
175,510,5837 
175,374,0307 
16,404,903 
16,404,903 
1,233,178 
1,202,538 
6. Conneaut 
Harbor, OH New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
375,000 
386,734 
1,155,000 
1,077,377 
864,374 
912,654 
1,005,000 
1,000,123 
8,346,6418 
8,346,6418 
13,511,8579 
13,476,9839 
651,850 
651,850 
20-20 
9,707 
10,424 
47,014 
48,238 
47,178 
47,894 
2,625 
2,039 
4,804,060 
4,804,060 
280,537 
279,931 
2,566,529 
2,566,529

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept 30, 1995 
Project 
7. Dunkirk 
Harbor, NY 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib.Funds) 
8. Erie Harbor, PA 
9. Fairport 
Harbor, NY 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
125,793 
132,617 
99,000 
94,679 
948,917 
805,990 
538,804 
491,799 
455,819 
459,659 
-100,957 
-75,159 
149,877 
197,839 
157,840 
76,216 
803,200 
803,248 
364,229 
359,284 
878,208 
519,839 
51,440 
51,286 
3,010,02410 
3,010,02410 
3,824,775 
3,819,451 
1,950,00011 
1,950,00011 
3,597,85312 
3,597,87312 
18,555,27013' 
18,110,54013 
1,154 
1,154 
2,959,61114 
2,959,61114 
17,581,319 
17,580,640 
20-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept 30, 1995 
Project 
10. Huron Harbor, 
OH 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
1,070,000 
1,059,587 
-18,045 
-2,321 
1,097,100 
1,055,488 
211,000 
223,101 
5,103,79515 
5,103,79515 
19,471,404 
19,441,695 
247,030 
247,030 
63,079 
63,079 
11. Irondequoit 
Bay, NY 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
-149 
-61 
35,271 
37,111 
159,783 
160,937 
- -2,109 
- -1,962 
12. Little Sodus 
Bay Harbor, NY New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
307 
2,642 
2,790 
3,535,651 
3,535,651 
627,806 
627,700 
2,718,077 
2,718,077 
11,500 
11,860 
33,001 
34,524 
310,362 
143,642 
196,000 
361,960 
301,39416 
301,39416 
3,889,860 
3,889,091 
742,822 
742,822 
20-22

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept 30, 1995 
Project 
13. Lorain Harbor, 
OH 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
14. Olcott Harbor, 
NY 
(Federal Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
92 
1,481,500 
1,487,178 
- -4,000 
1,426,900 
1,096,934 
970,100 
1,298,324 
600 
4,444 
1,682,400 
1,684,221 
22,240,67317 
22,240,21417 
33,169,293 
33,117,779 
845,551 
845,551 
425,000 
101,882 
7,755 
7,861 
28,669 22,067 
14,270 
14,270 
15,465 
15,465 
19,968 
18,109 
2,025,21018 
1,750,76418 
675,66119 
673,79919 
14,47720 
14,47720 
15. Oswego 
Harbor. NY New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
17,196 
56,086 
298,459 
187,197 
-77,746 
33,915 
55,469 
17,450 
8,430,01621 
8,430,01621 
7,864,41922 
7,826,35022 
20-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept 30, 1995 
Project 
16. Port Ontario 
Harbor, NY 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
-9,379 
4,656 
5,607 
5,607 
6,577 
855 
855 
- -21,000 
2,979 -20,814 
7,138 
7,138 
- 11,335 
- 4,930 
1,402 
1,402 
20,814 
2,369,62123 
2,368,98923 
33,261 
33,261 
1,361,335 
1,361,335 
17. Rochester 
Harbor, NY New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
663,500 
678,609 
647,725 
596,891 
165,189 
214,149 
1,626,925 
998,959 
2,439,30824 
2,439,30824 
23,028,66425 
23,023,24225 
18. Rocky River 
Harbor, OH New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
41,942 
43,690 
33,000 
32,844 
22,020 
22,195 
391,533 
351,458 
343,494 
343,494 
3,046,443 
3,006,365 
20-24

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept 30, 1995 
Project 
19. Sandusky 
Harbor, OH 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
20. Toledo 
Harbor, OH 
21. Vermilion 
Harbor, OH 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
973,200 
958,069 
4,581,000 
3,591,797 
78,052 
89,841 
794,833 
837,862 
7,683,000 
8,427,973 
4,942 
6,739 
307,500 
104,499 
2,797,617 
2,940,126 
6.993 
6,728 
1,643,000 
1,842,703 
5,142,000 
4,505,181 
210,086 
191,503 
6,727,27026 
6,727,27026 
20,986,817 
20,983,243 
675,606 
675,606 
15,445 
15,445 
17,191,84227 
17,191,84227 
110,894,89328 
110,154,55828 
1,156,11829 
1,156,11829 
2,659,635 
2,640,752 
139,775 
139,775 
20-25

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept 30, 1995 
Project 
26. Lake Erie 
Sturgeon Pt., NY 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds). 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
- 1,763 
13,500 
12,590 
7,754 
9,162 
11,250 
11,437 
56,000 
53,955 
10,360 
10,273 
- - -57,850 
- -1,763 -53,955 
1,742,90030 
1,718,54030 
50,864 
50,775 
1,299,008 
1,299,008 
27. Maumee Bay 
State Park, OH 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
39,379 
26,388 
-34,000 
22,608 
- 20,000 
19,721 6,816 
2,174 
55 
1,125 
28. Presque Isle 
Peninsula, Erie, 
PA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
30. Mt. Morris 
Lake, NY 
Genesee River 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
4,177,000 
4,794,605 
1,561,000 
1,455,003 
320,000 
336,580 
313,451 
428,295 
31,478,013 
31,464,970 
4,978 
4,978 
3,952,000 
4,789,383 
1,561,000 
1,433,422 
410,000 
548,132 
420,583 
426,458 
22,280,867 
22,267,788 
- 23,365,55931 
- 23,365,55931 
1,177,283 
1,048,530 
1,160,980 
1,244,168 
1,938,961 
1,833,294 
2,014,628 
2,055,536 
22,826,871 
22,663,154 
20-26 
-20,000 
-4,412 
170 
4,412 
2,786,379 
2,780,975 
199,845 
199,845

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept 30, 1995 
Project 
31. Reno Beach- 
Howard Farms 
Area, OH 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
35. Keuka Lake, 
NY 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
1,864,000 
1,769,880 
57,500 
105,272 
1,034 
92,031 
432,500 
410,321 
- 299,036 
-15,288 117,196 
20,000 
17,493 
90,000 
36,964 
35. Swan Creek 
Toledo, OH 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
36. Onondaga 
Storm Water 
Discharge, NY New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
- 1,723,000 
- 11,462 
1. Includes $565,192 for previous projects. Excludes 
$47,000 contributed funds. 
2 Includes $58,027 for previous projects. 
3. Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority 
administrative costs transferred for new work to 
maintenance upon conversion to programming and 
budgeting system July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, 
20-27 
13,292 
3,948 
186,798 
55,407 
50,000 
7,865 
5,350 
-1,188 
5,532,594 
5,532,551 
482,500 
422,134 
486,03432 
480,97732 
110,000 
108,676 
38,000 
41,794 75,015 
70,652 
480,000 
40,260 
513,500 
49,078 
1,176,600 
1,378,414 
447,269 
1,949,615 
1,707,243 
513,500 
496,347 
1,683,000 
60,292 
3,406,000 
71,754

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations and 
costs under appropriation titles 96X3123 Operations 
and Maintenance and 96X5125 Maintenance and 
Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of 
Navigable Waters. 
4. Includes $4,277,586 for previous projects. 
Excludes expenditures 
of $239,305 for work authorized by Section 107. 
5. Includes $1,883,647 for previous projects. 
Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 
6. Includes $1,564,154 for previous project and 
appropriations and costs of $16,596 for modification 
authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 
107, 1960 R&H Act. 
7. Includes appropriations and costs under 
appropriation titles 96x3123 Operations and 
Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and 
Operations of Dams and Other Improvements of 
Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed 
funds. 
8. Includes $805,272 for previous projects. 
9. Includes $39,784 for previous projects. 
10. Includes $811,250 for previous projects. 
Excludes $11,000 contributed funds. 
11. Includes $176,520 for previous projects. 
12. Includes $736,967 for previous projects. 
13. Includes $104,900 for previous projects. 
Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 
14. Includes $368,940 for previous projects. 
15. Includes $269,789 for previous projects. 
16. Includes $232,328 for previous projects. 
17. Includes $292,203 for new work for previous 
projects. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also 
excludes appropriation and cost of $29,570 under 
authority of Section 107, 1960 R&H Act. 18. Excludes 
$224,702 contributed funds. 
18. Includes $140,210 for previous projects. Excludes 
$1,500 contributed funds. 
19. Includes $38,959 for previous projects. Excludes 
$5,000 contributed funds. 
20. Excludes $186,000 Public Works Acceleration 
Act. 
21. Includes $1,187,977 for previous projects. 
22. Includes $945,684 for previous projects. 
23. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 
24. Includes $247,794 for previous projects. 
25. Includes $617,529 for previous projects and $478 
emergency relief authority administration costs 
transferred from new work to maintenance upon 
conversion to programming and budgeting system, 
July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of 
Engineers. 
26. 27. Includes $1,624,695 for previous projects. 
28. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 
29. Excludes $740,679 contributed funds. 
30. Includes$341,900 study funds under authority 
Section 107, 1960 R&H Act. 
31. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 
32. Includes study costs of $117,000 under authority 
Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. Excludes 
$17,493 in contributed costs. 
20-28

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH (See Section 1 of Text) 
June 3, 1896 
Mar. 3, 1905 
June 25, 1910 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Sept. 3, 1954 
July 14, 1960 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Construction of breakwater. 
Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and 
constructing new east breakwater pierheads on lakeward 
ends of breakwaters; and remove part of old east 
breakwater. 
Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a 
depth of 20 feet. 
Remove portion of east breakwater to, extend breakwaters 
to present dimensions and dredging restrictions in 
portion of west basin. 
Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to 
Penn Central Co. slip, channel Ashtabula River, to and in 
turning basin all to present project dimensions; remove 
portion of old east inner breakwater and maintenance to 
24-foot depth of portion of outer harbor. 
Extend river channel to present project limit. 
Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outer 
harbor 25-foot depth. 
A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in 
entrance channel to just inside outer ends of breakwaters, 
thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a 
channel to inner breakwater, thence 27 feet in soft and 28 
feet in hard materials in a channel extending to Penn Central 
Co. slip and extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River, 22 feet 
in hard material in turning area; and 28 feet in soft and 29 
feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of 
inner breakwater when that section is removed as now 
authorized. 
Dredging approach, channel and turning basin in east outer 
harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. 
Annual Report,1895, p.2132 
H. Doc. 654. 61st Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 997, 64th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 1st 
sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 78, 74th 
Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 321, 77th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
486, 83rd Cong., 2d 
148, 86th Cong., 1st 
H. Doc. 
sess. 
H. Doc. 
sess. 
H. Doc. 269, 89th cong., 1st 
sess.4 
20-29

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Aug 11, 1888 
June 3, 1896 
June 13, 1902 
June 13, 1902 
Aug 8, 1917 
Mar. 3, 1905 
July 27, 1916 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Sept. 22, 1922 
Mar. 3, 1925 
June 26, 19345 
Aug. 30, 19356 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Sept. 3, 1954 
BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, 
NY (See Section 2 of Text). 
Dredging channel through horseshoe reef at outlet of Lake 
Erie and Tonawanda Inner Harbor to 16 feet. 
Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. 
Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of 
Maryland St., Buffalo, to 21 feet. 
Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to 
natural deep water pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 
21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair 
of Bird Island pier towpath wall. 
Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin 
at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. 
Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north 
entrance channel. 
Widening channel at foot of Maryland St., Buffalo. 
Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of 
westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. 
Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds 
from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. 
Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in 
canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; enlargement of 
North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island Pier 
improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of 
upper 150 feet of Tonawanda Creek channel from the 
project. 7 
Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. 
Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and 
enlarge turning basin. 
H. Ex. Doc. 83, 50th 
Cong., 1st sess. Annual 
Report, 1888, p.2066, 
and Annual Report, 
1897, pp. 3116-3120. 
H. Doc. 143, 56th Cong., 1st 
sess. and Annual Report, 
1900 p. 4 15 2 . 
H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2d 
sess., and Annual Report 
1901, p.3343 . 
H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 658, 63rd Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong., 
2d sess. and H. Doc. 92, 
79th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc.289, 68th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 28, 73rd Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st 
sess.4 
H. Doc. 423, 83rd Cong., 2d 
sess. 4 ,8 
20-30

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
May 20, 1826 
June 23, 1866 
June 23, 1874 
June 3, 1896 
Mar. 3, 1899 
Mar. 3, 1909 
June 6, 1900 
June 13, 1902 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Mar. 2, 190710 
June 25, 1910 
July 25, 1912 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Jan. 21, 1927 
July 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935" 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Mar. 2, 1945" 
July 14, 1960 
BUFFALO HARBOR, NY (See Section 3 of Text) 
Construction of south pier (extended in 1868) 9. 
Construction of old breakwater. 9 
Extension of old breakwater. 9 
Stony Point and south breakwater. 9 
North breakwater. 9 
Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing 
rock shoal therein. 
Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer 
harbor. 
South entrance breakwater. 9 
Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and removal 
of Watson elevator site. 9 
Deepening areas A, B, D, in outer harbor to 21 feet, C in 
north entrance to 23 feet. 
Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to 21 feet. 
Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River 
and Erie Basin to 21 feet. 
Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor 21 feet. 
Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, 
deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, 
and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. 
Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship 
canal to 21 feet in cooperation with city of Buffalo. 
Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, 
and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and 
Buffalo ship canal to present project dimensions. 
Deepening approach to south entrance channels, and deepen 
to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of 
southerly part of outer harbor. 
Annual Report, 1868, pp. 
222 and 232. 
Annual Report, 1868, pp. 
232 and 236. 
Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, 
pp. 569 and 573. 
Annual Report, 1895, p. 
3153. 
H. Doc. 72, 55th Cong., 1st 
sess., and Annual Report, 
1897, p. 3245. 
Specified in acts. 
Specified in act. 
H. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 298, Rivers and 
Harbors Committee Doc. 
2, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 550, 62d Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong. 
1st sess. 
H.Doc. 481, 68th Cong.,2d 
sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 1, 71st 
Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 46, 73d Cong., 1st 
sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 54, 74th 
Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 352, 78th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 151, 86th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
20-31

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Oct. 23, 1962 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
Aug. 13, 1968 
CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH (See Section 5 of Text). 
Mar. 3, 1875 West breakwater. 
Aug. 5, 1886 
Aug. 11, 1888 
June 3, 1896 
Mar. 3, 1899 
June 13, 1902 
Mar. 2, 1907 
June 25, 1910 
July 25, 1916 
Part of east breakwater. 9 
Extension of east breakwater. 
Reconstruction of piers. 9 
Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 
19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor 
in disretion of Secretary of War. 
Arrowhead breakwater and extension of east breakwater. 
Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and closure 
of gap between old and new east breakwaters. 
Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. 
Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a 
width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet northward from 
28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to 
limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet 
from harbor line and continuing within these limits for 
7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between 
presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging 
limits. Elimination of easterly 50-foot wide undredged 
strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending 
northerly from 27-foot depth to Buffalo River entrance 
channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions 
of work authorized by 1935 act, combined within this 
act as a single improvement. 
Removal of abandoned abutments of South Michigan bridge. 
CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, N Y (See Section 4 of Text). 
Construction of arrowhead breakwaters at mouth of Creek 
entrance channel 200 feet wide at lakeward end, 100 feet 
wide and 8 feet deep from that depth in lake to point 
1,575 feet upstream; channel 100 feet wide, 6 feet deep 
an additional 3,425 feet upstream; and recreational 
fishing facilities at mouth. 
20-32 
H. Doc. 451, 87th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
Sec. 107, PL 86-645. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers Dec. 15, 1980. 
H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
Annual Report,1876, p.558. 
H. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th 
Cong., 2d sess, and 
Annual Report, 1886, p. 
1865.H. Ex. Doc. 189, 
50th Cong., 2d sess., and 
Annual Report, 1888, p. 
2005. 
H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., 1st 
sess., and Annual Report, 
1896, p. 2949. 
H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 2d 
sess., and Annual Report 
1899, p. 3 0 75 and 3078. 
H. Doc. 118, 56th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
No printed report. 
H. Doc. 891, 63d cong., 2d 
sess.

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Aug. 29, 1937 
Aug. 30, 193512 
Aug. 30, 193511 
Mar. 2, 194514 
July 24, 1946 
July 3, 1958 
July 14, 1960 
Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga and Old 
Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet upstream 
from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. 
Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to present 
project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur breakwater 
at gap in shore arm of west breakwater, removal of easterly 
150 feet of west breakwater, elimination from project of a 
298-foot southerly extension on west pier, and abandonment 
of inner 932 feet of shore arm of west breakwater. 
Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as 
an emergency measure. 
Maintenance of extension of Cuyahoga River channel. 
Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 
feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit. 15,"
6 
Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet 
and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad bridges. 2 
Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; 
replacement of Erie-Lackawanna Railroad bridge over 
Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that 
point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge 
as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore and 
Ohio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and 
Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth 
and widening channel at four locations along lower, 2,000 
feet of river. 3 
Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in 
entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of 
Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its 
junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit 
of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within 
existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular 
area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to and 
75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet in westerly 800 feet of 
east basin. 24 
H. Doc. 707, 63d Cong., 2d 
sess., and Rivers and 
Harbors Committee Doc. 
84, 74th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 477, 72d Cong., 2d 
sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 39, 74th 
Cong., 1st sess. 
Specified in act. 
H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
20-33

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Oct. 23, 1962 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
Oct. 22, 1976 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Dec. 21, 1987 
H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2d 
sess. 4 
Sec. 107, PL 86-645. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers Dec. 6, 1966. 
Sec. 175, PL 94-587 
An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending 3,800 feet easterly 
of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from east 
breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet 
lakeward of and parallel to harbor line. A dock channel to 
Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at easterly end of 
east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of 
pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared 
toward the lake. 
Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 to 27 feet. 
Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements 
consisting of removal of portions of entrance breakwater; 
construction of breakwater; construction of breakwater 
extension of east entrance; deepening approach and entrance 
channels; construction of diked disposal area; and, installation 
of recreational fishing facilities on west breakwater. 
Deepening and widening east entrance and approach channels, 
channels, deepening the east basin channel and disposing of 
dredge material in an existing disposal site, as described in 
the Report to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and 
Harbors January 22, 1985, including bulkheading and other 
necessary repairs at Pier 34 and approach channels and 
necessary protective structures for mooring basins for 
transient vessels in the area south of Pier 34 and including 
such modifications as may be recommended by the Chief 
of Engineers at a cost not to exceed $36,000,000. 
Bulkheading and other necessary repairs at Pier 34 and 
approach channels and necessary protective structures for 
mooring basins for transient wells in the area south of Pier 
34. 
Appropriates and directs the Secretary of the Army to use the 
sum of $11,000,000 which is to remain available until 
expended to carry out the provisions for the harbor 
modifications contained in PL 99-662. 
Sec. 202, PL 99-662. 
PL 100-202. 
20-34 
Aug. 15, 1985 PL 99-88

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH (See Section 6 of Text) 
June 25, 1910 
Aug. 8, 1917 
17 
Aug. 30, 1935" 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Nov. 7, 19668 
Nov. 28, 1990 
Mar. 2, 1827 
Mar. 2, 1867 
June 3, 1896 
June 25, 1910 
June 30, 1948 
Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west 
breakwater, removal of portion of old west breakwater, 
and dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. 
Realignment of west breakwater, removal of remainder of old 
west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. 
Removal of Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet 
of west pier. 17 
Removal of portion of west breakwater, extension of 
breakwaters to present project dimensions, construction of 
pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters, deepening outer 
harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions 
of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255-foot 
shoreward extension of west breakwater. 
Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft 
material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining 
triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft material 
and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 
2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in 
soft material and 28 feet in hard material; removal of east 
pier, extension of east breakwater to shore; and an access 
channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. 
Previously authorized, but uncompleted portion of work 
authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act 
for accomplishment as a single improvement. 
Recreational small boat harbor provided by: a stone dike about 
2,200 feet long; access channels 6 feet deep, 2,800 feet 
long and 100 feet wide; closing of 100-foot gap in existing 
west breakwater, and personnel guardrail on west 
breakwater. 
Continuation of 1966 authorization. 
DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY (See Section 7 of Text). 
Construction of west pier.9" 8 
Breakwater and evacuation of entrance channel to 13 feet. 9 
Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a depth of 
suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. 
Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. 
Deepening outer entrance channel to present project depths; 
removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance 
channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the 
inner entrance channel and basin to present project 
dimensions. 
Doc. 653, 61st Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 983, 64th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 48, 73d Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 415, 87th Cong.,2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 484, 89th Cong., 2d 
sess. 4 
Sec. 107, PL 101-640. 
S.Ex.Doc.42, 35th Cong., 
1st sess. and Annual 
Report 1866 pt. IV, p.155 
Annual Report,1871, p. 214 
H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 720, 61st Cong. 2d 
sess. 4 
H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
20-35

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Dec. 15, 1970 
(House Public Works 
Committee) 
June 22, 1971 
(Senate Public Works 
Committee) 
Sec. 201 of F.C. Act 
of 1965 
May 26, 1824 
Mar. 3, 1899 
June 15, 1910 
Nov. 28, 192020 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Sept. 3, 1954 
July 14, 1960 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Construction of small-boat harbor. 
ERIE HARBOR, PA (See Section 8 of Text). 
Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and 
brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle peninsula. 9 
Deepening channel and harbor basin too 18 feet; repair and 
extension of piers; and plant growth and emergency 
protection of work on peninsula. 
Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet. 
Reconveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of 
Pennsylvania for park purposes. 
Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, 
dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, all to 
present project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater 
from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length 
of 1,200 feet. 
Protection of the peninsula south of the waterworks settling 
basin. 
Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. 
Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the 
inner end of the north pier, thence 28 feet in soft material 
and 29 feet in hard material in the remainder of the 
entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot 
basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as 
modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area 
along the easterly side; and a depth of 28 feet over 300- 
foot westward extension of the 25-foot basin. 26 
Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material 
in approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously 
authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 
1935 act is combined with this act as a single 
improvement. 
H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 
2d sess. 
Annual Report, 1915, p. 
1965. 
H.Doc.70, 55th Cong.,lst 
sess. and Annual Report, 
1896, p. 32 3 7 .19 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 26, 61st 
Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 52, 73d Cong., 1st 
sess. 
Specified in act. 
H. Doc. 345, 83d Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 199, 86th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2d 
sess. 4 
20-36

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 3, 182521 
June 3, 1896 
Mar. 3, 1905 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Jan. 21, 1927 
July 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 193522 
Aug. 26, 1937 
July 24, 1946 
July 14, 196032 
May 10, 1977 
(House Public Works 
Comm.) Oct. 1, 1976 
(Senate Public Works 
Comm.) Sec. 201 of 
F.C. Act of 1965 
Nov. 28, 1990 
FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH (See Section 9 of Text). 
Construction of piers. 
Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. 
1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project 
dimension of east pier, and deepening of to 19 feet. 
4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to the 
United States of $715,000. 
Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present 
dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present 
project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal 
of west pier, and construction of bulkhead on west side of 
river channel. 
Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turning basin 
in Grand River to present project dimensions. 
Dredging of 8-foot river channel. 
Depth of 29 feet in the approach channel from the lake; a 
depth of 28 feet over a width of 800 feet in outer harbor; a 
depth of 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in 
Grand River, over a width of 200 feet to upstream limit of 
the turning basin, with suitable widening at the bends, 
thence over widths reducing from 200 to 100 feet to the 
upstream limit of the existing Federal project, except in the 
8-foot channel; enlargement of the turning basin, including 
deepening of the entire basin to 21 feet; and minor 
modification of the existing project limits in the outer 
harbor. 
Construction of a small boat harbor. 
Annual Report, 1889, pp. 
2147-2153. 
H .Doc. 347, 54th Cong.,lst 
sess. and Annual Reports, 
1896, p.2956; 1903, p. 
2084; 1905, p. 2349. 
H. Doc. 206, 63d Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2d 
sess., Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 13, 70th 
Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 472, 72d Cong., 2d 
sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 79, 74th 
Cong., 2d sess.4 
H. Doc. 706, 79th Cong., 2d 
sess. 4 
H. Doc. 347, 86th Cong., 2d 
4 
sess. 
H. Doc. 627, 94th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
Continuation of 1960 and 1965 authorizations. Sec. 107, PL 101-640 
20-37

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar 2, 1905 
Mar 2, 1919 
Aug. 30, 193522 
Oct. 23, 1962 
July 3, 1958 
Aug. 30, 1852 
June 23, 1866 
Mar. 3, 1871 
Mar. 3, 1881 
June 13, 1902 
Mar. 3, 1899 
HURON HARBOR, OH (See Section 10 of Text). 
Extension of west pier, construction of east breakwater, 
removal of part of old east pier; deepening of channel to 
19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. 
Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east 
pier, construction of new spur pier, enlargement of 
sheltered area; and closure of beach at shore end of west 
pier. 
Extension of west pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer 
end of east breakwater and construction pierhead on new 
outer end; widening and deepening channel to present 
project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of 
channel; shore protection west of west pier, and 
elimination from project construction of spur pier and 
dredging sheltered area outside channel limits. 
Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance 
channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin 
and abandonment of lakeward end of existing approach 
channel. 
IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY (See Section 11 of Text). 
Construction of entrance channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet 
wide, extending from 9-foot depth in Lake Ontario to 
junction with inner bay channels, a distance of about 
1,300 feet; inner channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, 
from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of 
about 3,035 feet, access channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet 
wide and 500 feet in length from the inner bay channel to 
the west; two stone rubblemound structures 1,350 feet and 
750 in length at the natural entrance; and recreational 
facilities. 
LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY 
(See Section 12 of Text). 
West entrance pier. 9 
Extension of west pier and construction of west breakwater, 
and dredging channel to 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide. 9 
East pier and east breakwater. 9 
Extension of piers lakeward to 15.5-foot contour, and dredging 
channel to 15.5 feet. 
Extension of east pier 300 feet lakeward. 
LORAIN HARBOR, OH (See Section 13 of Text). 
Breakwaters and extension of piers to present dimensions. 
H. Doc. 
sess. 
H. Doc. 
sess. 
122, 58th Cong., 2d 
5, 63d Cong., 1st 
H. Doc. 478, 72d Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
Annual Report, 1874, p.2 5 6 
Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. 
Annual Report, 1871, p.2 3 4 
Annual Report, 1881, pp. 
2444 and 2446. 
Annual Report, 1901, p. 
3364. 
H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 2d 
sess., and Annual Report 
1898, p. 2718. 
20-38

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
A 11+ nT _, i~niIc n 
I u LBU -toUIz g asVII DILcIu 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 2, 1907 
June 25, 1910 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Aug. 8, 1917 
July 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue 
Bridge. 
Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in outer 
harbor. 
Extend breakwaters to present dimensions. 
Deepen outer harbor and river channel of Erie Avenue Bridge 
to 20 feet. 
Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. 
drydock. 
Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite 
National Tube Co. dock. 12 
Approach channel to municipal pier. 
Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American 
Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 present project dimensions and 
extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube 
Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. 
Maintenance dredging in Black River from American 
Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2. Upper end of National Tube 
Co. dock was authorized Apr. 7, 1934, by Public Works 
Administration. 
H. Doc. 560, 60th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 644, 
sess. 
H. Doc. 980, 
61st Cong., 2d 
64th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 985, 64th Cong., 1s 
sess. 
H. Doc. 587, 69th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 469, 72d Cong., 2d 
sess. 
Senate Committee print, 73d 
Cong., 2d sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 51, 74th 
Cong., 1st sess. 
Enlarging turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock to 
present project dimensions. 
Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream 
Mar. 2, 1945 from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. 
July 14, 1960 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a 
vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead 
breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct 
extension of east breakwater, to shore; remove 300 feet of 
lakeward end of west breakwater; remove outer 1,100 feet 
east pier; deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide 
outer harbor channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at 
bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near 
upstream limit of existing project. 27 
Construction of a 225 foot detached rubblemound breakwater 
and an 800 foot long rubblemound breakwater attached to 
the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer 
harbor. 
Two bed cuts on Black River between the Norfolk and 
Western Railroad Bridge and 21st Street Bridge, excavated 
to existing channel depth of 27 feet. Widening Upper 
Turning Basin at existing authorized depth of 21 feet. 8 
Specified in act. 
H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 
1st. sess. 
Sec. 107, PL 86-645. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers Mar 12, 1986 
H. Doc. 124, 99th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
20-39 
t
1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 20-B 
Acts 
Mar. 2, 1867 
Mar. 4, 1913 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Authorizing Legislation 
Work Authorized 
OLCOTT HARBOR, NY (See Section 14 of Text). 
Dredging a channel 11 feed deep between parallel piers. 9 
Deepening channel to 12 feet and maintenance of west pier. 
Construct the project for Navigation, Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated June 11, 1980. 
Documents 
Annual Report, 1866, pt. III, 
p. 15 pt. IV, p. 158. 
H. Doc. 780, 62d Cong., 2d 
sess. 
4 
Sec. 601, PL 99-662 
20-40

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Nov 16, 1990 
Nov 28, 1990 
Oct 31, 1992 
ONONDAGA LAKE, NY (See Section 36 of Text) 
The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and 
the Governor of the State of New York, acting jointly, shall 
convene a management conference for the restoration and 
management of Onondaga Lake. The purpose of the 
conference shall include the development, in the 2-year 
period beginning on the date of enactment of this fact, for a 
comprehensive restoration, conservation, and management 
plan for Onondaga Lake that recommends priority 
corrective actions and compliance scheduled for the cleanup 
of the Lake and the coordination of the implementation of 
the plan by the State of New York, the U.S. Army Corps 
of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency and all 
local agencies, governments and other groups participating 
in the management conference. 
Not later than 120 days after the completion of the plan, and 
after providing for public review and comment, the 
Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works and the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall 
approve the plan if it meets the requirements of this section 
and if the Governor of the State of New York concurs in 
such approval. 
Upon approval of the plan, the plan shall be implemented. 
The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works and 
the Administrator of the environmental Protection Agency 
are authorized to make grants to the State of New York to 
perform activities authorized under this section or to 
contract for such performance, provided that such grants 
shall not exceed 70% of the costs of such activities and that 
the non-Federal share of such costs are provided from non- 
Federal sources. The Governor of the State of New York 
may, using funds provided above, make grants for research, 
surveys, administrative services and studies approved by the 
management conference, and gathering data and retaining 
expert consultants in support of litigation undertaken by the 
State of New York to compel cleanup or obtain cleanup and 
damage costs from parties responsible for the pollution of 
Onondaga Lake, including administrative services. 
Reaffirmation of PL 101-596. 
The Secretary is authorized to design and construct projects to 
address water quality problems associated with storm water 
discharges from large storm events for...the watershed areas 
of Onondaga County and Syracuse, New York, from which 
waters discharge into Onondaga Lake, New York... 
The design of projects shall ensure the development of 
effective Federal and non-Federal actions which will 
contribute toward compliance with the Federal Water 
20-41 
PL 101-596 
PL 101-640 
PL 102-580

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Total project costs shall be shared at 75% Federal and 25% 
non-Federal. Operation and maintenance cost shall be 100% 
non-Federal. 
July 11, 1870 
Mar. 2, 1907 
July 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Oct 17, 1940 
June 30, 1948 
Sept. 3, 1954 
Oct. 23, 1962 
OSWEGO HARBOR, NY (See Section 15 of Text) 
Construction of outer west breakwater. 9 
Repair of outer west breakwater under Plan (A). 3 
Construction of arrowhead breakwaters; deepening outer harbor 
between arrowhead breakwaters; west outer harbor east of 
Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, and Oswego River north of 
Seneca St., to 21 feet; and deepening west outer harbor, west 
of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to 16 feet. 29 
Widening channel to harbor line in Oswego River north of 
Seneca Street. 
Closing gap in west breakwater; deepening west outer harbor, 
west of east line of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to project 
depth.30 
Construction of east outer breakwater; removal of the inner end 
of east arrowhead breakwater; and dredging channel and 
basin in east outer harbor.31 
Construction of detached breakwater at harbor entrance and 
removal of shoals in approach to harbor entrance to 25 feet 
deep. 
Depth of 27 feet in lake approach channel; 25 feet deep in 
outer harbor channel 800 feet wide from entrance gap to a 
turning basin 25 feet deep about 750 by 1,100 feet, at mouth 
of Oswego River; depth of 24 feet in earth and 25 feet in 
hard material in river channel from turning basin to upstream 
end of Port of Oswego Authority's east side terminal, a 
distance of about 1,600 feet; relocation of Federal project 
limits in Oswego River upstream of 24-foot channel to 
Federal project limit at north line of West Seneca St., on 
lines parallel to 50 feet channel ward of established harbor 
lines; elimination of maintenance of inner west breakwater 
and elimination of maintenance of inner west breakwater and 
elimination of modification authorized by River and Harbor 
Act of 1948. 
Annual Report, 1870, pp. 54, 
220 and 221. 
H. Doc. 55, 58th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 24, 71st 
Cong., 2nd sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 7, 74th 
Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 96, 76th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 
sess. 
H. Doc. 
sess. 
722, 80th Cong., 2d 
487, 81st Cong., 2d 
H. Doc. 471, 87th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
PORT ONTARIO, NY (See Section 16 of Text). 
Mar. 2, 1945 Construct harbor of refuge. 
Nov. 17, 1986 Maintain harbor of refuge. 
H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
Sec. 615, PL 99-662. 
20-42

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 2, 1829 
Aug. 2, 1882 
June 25, 1910 
Aug. 30, 19356 
Mar. 2, 1945 
July 14, 1960 
July 14, 1960 
June 10, 1872 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Mar. 3, 1899 
June 13, 1902 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Aug. 30, 1935" 
ROCHESTER, HARBOR, NY (See Section 17 of Text) 
Construction of piers.9 
Extension of piers to 15 foot contour in the lake. 
Concrete superstructure on piers.9 
Deepening channel to 20 feet. 
Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the 
elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to 
present project dimensions. 
Maintenance of existing channel upstream of the Penn Central 
Co. bridge. 
Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west pier, 
a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to 
the Penn Central Co. bridge, including the existing turning 
basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream 
project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, 
upstream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feet wide 
adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring 
dolphins. 
Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west pier, 
a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to 
the Penn Central Co. bridge, including the existing turning 
basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream 
project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, 
upstream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feet wide 
adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring 
dolphins. 
ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OH (See Section 18 of Text). 
East pier and dredging of channel. 
Extension of east pier and deepening channel to present project 
dimensions. 
Realign and extend channel and construct an anchorage basin. 
SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH (See Section 19 of Text). 
Construction of channel protection works. 
Widening of Straight and Dock channels and deepening to 19 
feet. 
Extension of east jetty to total length of 6,000 feet, with 
pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and 
easterly portion of Dock channel to 20 feet. 
Deepening of Dock Channel to 22 feet. 
Enlargement of turning basin and construction of rock 
dike. 
Annual Report, 1874, p. 247 
Annual Report, 1881, p. 2437 
Annual Report, 1905, p. 
2383. 
H. Doc. 
sess. 
H. Doc. 
sess. 
H. Doc. 
sess. 
H. Doc. 
sess. 
4 
342, 61st Cong., 2d 
484, 72d Cong., 2d 
139, 76th cong., 1st 
409, 86th Cong., 2d 
H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2d 
sess. 4 
Annual Report 1871, p. 2 1 1 
H. Doc. 70, 75th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 352, 88th Cong., 2d 
sess.4 
H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2d 
sess. and Annual Report 
1898, p. 2708. 
H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 2, 73d 
Cong, 1st sess. 
20-43

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Maintenance of Bay Channel to 22 feet; and elimination 
from project of portion of turning basin and rock 
dike. 
Mar. 2, 1945 
July 14, 1960 
Mar. 3, 1899 
June 25, 1910 
Aug. 30, 1935 
May 17, 1950 
Sept. 3, 1954 
July 3, 1958 
July 14, 1960 
H. Doc. 
sess. 
Extending Moseley Channel and deepening that channel and the H. Doc. 
outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in sess. 4 
the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the 
bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels to 
25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to junction Bay 
channel; deepening the Bay channel from the junction with 
the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania 
Coal dock No. 3 to 24 feet, thence from outer end of the 
coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 
25 in hard, with no Federal dredging within 50 feet of the 
dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of 
approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 
feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. 
TOLEDO HARBOR, OH (See Section 20 of Text). 
A channel 400 feet wide and 21 feet deep from 25-foot contour 
in Maumee Bay to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide and 
19 feet deep above that point and a 500 -foot turning basin at 
Upper End. A stone revetted earth dike in Maumee Bay 
Channel. 
Act 1899 modified to insure a navigable channel to 21 feet 
from Fassett Street Bridge to Lake. 
Channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from 25-foot contour 
to mouth of Maumee River (300 feet wide on each side of 
center dike in Bay Channel), thence 400 feet wide to Fassett 
Street Bridge, 200 feet wide above that point and a turning 
basin at Upper end 18 feet deep. 
Widening at bend of mouth of River opposite Chesapeake and 
Ohio Railway Dock. 
Removal of center dike in Maumee Bay Channel. 
Enlarge widening at bend opposite Chesapeake and Ohio dock 
and turning basin opposite American Shipbuilding Co. dock. 
Deepening Bay Channel including widening to 28 feet, deepen 
River channels to New York Central Railroad Bridge to 27 
feet and construct new turning basin below Anthony Wayne 
Bridge. 28 
VERMILION HARBOR, OH (See Section 21 of Text). 
July 4, 1836 Parallel piers and dredging channel to 8 feet deep. 
328, 76th Cong., 1st 
144, 86th Cong., 1st 
H. Doc. 198, 55th Cong., 2d 
sess. and Annual Report 
1898, p. 2693. 
H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
River and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 21, 72d Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 189, 81st Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doc. 620, 81st Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 436, 84th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 153, 86th Cong., 1st 
sess. 4 
Annual Report, 1880. 
20-44

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 3, 1875 
Mar. 3, 1905 
July 3, 1958 
July 14, 1960 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Sept. 3, 1954 
July 14, 1960 
Mar. 7, 1974 
Oct. 22, 1976 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Dec 22, 1944 
June 30, 1948 
Deepening of channel to 12 feet . 
Reconstruction of piers. 
New entrance formed by two overlapping arrowhead 
breakwaters and extension of existing river channel upstream 
to Liberty St. Bridge. 
STURGEON POINT, EVANS, NY (See Section 26 of Text). 
Rehabilitate existing breakwater, construct rubblemound west 
breakwater extension, construct rubblemound east 
breakwater, a shore revetment and dredging. 
MAUMEE BAY STATE PARK BAY, OH (See Section 27 
of Text). 
Protective sand beach stabilized by rubblemound offshore 
breakwaters and jetties along the west half of park shoreline 
and rubblemound revetment at the east end of the park. 
PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA (See Section 28 
of Text). 
Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of 
beach material at waterworks reservation and along 
remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing 
structures. 
Periodic nourishment of shores for a 10-year period. 
Periodic nourishment of shore for a 5-year period. 
Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements 
consisting of construction of five sections of spaced offshore 
breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sand fill. 
Construct offshore breakwaters and restore beaches. 
MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, NY 
See Section 30 of Text). 
Construction of a concrete gravity dam and reservoir. 
Construct a visitor center at Mt. Morris Dam to be known as 
the "William B. Hoyt II Visitor Center". 
RENO BEACH - HOWARD FARMS AREA, OHIO (See 
Section 31 of Text). 
Construction of dike and levees. 
Annual Report, 1874, p.219 
H. Doc. 252, 58th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 231, 85th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
Sec. 107, PL86-645. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers Oct. 21, 1987 
Sec. 501, PL 99-662. 
H. Doc. 231, 81st Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H.Doc. 397, 86th Cong.,2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 796, 93d Cong., 2d 
sess. 
Sec. 101, PL 94-587 
Sec. 501, PL 99-662. 
H. Doc 615, 78th Cong.,2d 
sess. 
Sec. 103, PL 102-580 
H. Doc 554, 80th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
20-45

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 20-B 
June 30, 1948 
as amended 
June 30, 1948 
Authorizing Legislation 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
KEUKA LAKE, PENN YAN, NY (See Section 35 of Text). 
Removal of an existing earthen and masonry dam located just 
upstream of the Main Street Bridge and replace with 
additional slide gates tied into existing races located on each 
side of the stream. 
SWAN CREEK, TOLEDO, OH (See Section 35 of Text). 
Construction of levee and floodwall system. 
Relocate 540 foot section of creek. 
Sec 205, PL 80-858. 
Authorized by Chief of 
Engineers Jan. 25, 1991. 
Sec 205, PL 80-858 
authorized by Chief of 
Engineers May 15, 1991. 
1. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 
1933. 
2. Widening Cuyahoga River downstream at end of Cut 4 
classified inactive. 
3. Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening 
Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. 
4. Contains latest published map. 
5. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 
6. Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief 
Administration Act of 1935. 
7. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock was 
deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 
8. Classified deferred. 
9. Completed under previous projects. 
10. Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar. 3, 1905. 
11. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, 
Sept. 6, 1933. 
12. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 
1933. 
13. Previously authorized by Public Works Administration. 
14. First Deficiency Appropriations Act approved April 1, 
1944. 
15. Authorized by Defense Plant Corp., May 19, 1942. 
16. Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated 
from project by 1962 R&H Act. 
17. Permit of Secretary of War, Aug. 5, 1927. 
18. Modified 1828 and 1852. 
19. Extension of north pier portion of this modification was 
deauthorized Nov. 1981. 
20. Public Law 366. 
21. Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed 
under previous projects. 
22. Partly included in Public Works Administration program, 
Nov. 15, 1933. 
23. First Supplemental National Defense Appropriation Act, 
1944 approved Dec. 23, 1943. 
24. Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge 1 
to and including Old River, classified deferred. 
25. Included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 
15, 1933. 
26. Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers was 
deauthorized Aug. 1982. 
27. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River 
channel at Cut 1 has been deauthorized. 
28. The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet an turning basin 
relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. 
29. Deepening a 200-foot strip along harbor line east of 
mouth of Oswego River is deauthorized. 
30. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip in west outer 
harbor deauthorized in May 1981. 
31. Modification eliminated by River and Harbor Act of Oct. 
26, 1962. 
32. Modification classified inactive. 
20-46

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
TABLE 20-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(See Section 29 of Text) 
For Last Cost to 
Full Report September 30,1995 
See Annual Operations and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Barcelona Harbor, NY Completed 1989 $ 1,185,85316 $ 1,938,409 
Big (Cunningham) Creek, OH' Completed - 2 19,7633- 
Black River Harbor, NY 4 _ _ 2 42,401- 
Buffalo Small Boat Harbor, NY Completed 1994 602,01619 - 
Cape Vincent Harbor, NY Completed 1962 275,082 1,566,059 
Cattaraugus Creek, NY5 - - 2 57,410- 
Geneva-on-the-Lake, OH Completed 1990 3,145,176' 9,627 
Grasse River (Massena),NY - 1891 9,0003 - 
Great Sodus Bay, NY - 1992 1,324,503 2,626,54118 
Kelleys Island, OH Active 197412 129,874- 
Little River at Cayuga Island, NY Completed 1969 46,8047 6,580 
Morristown Harbor, NY Completed 1949 6,221 12,671 
Niagara Remedial Works, NY8 Completed 1966 6,069,395 510,819 
Niagara River, NY 13 Completed 1964 559,4579 283,733 
Ogdensburg Harbor, NY Completed 1987 1,720,46614 1,400,782 5 
Pultneyville Harbor, NY" - 1934 68,219 20,087 
Put in Bay, OH Completed 195112 51,609 14,357 
Sackets Harbor, OH Completed 1982 25,010 28,477 
Sandusky River, OH 4 - 1894 58,0003 557 
1. No commerce reported. 
2. Only information available is in index to reports of Chief of 
Engineers. 
3. Amount includes maintenance; not separable. 
4. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
5. Abandonment recommended in Ex. Doc. 16, 35th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
6. Channel improved by local interests. 
7. Includes local interests contribution of $25,742. 
8. Costs of operation and maintenance of this project will be settled 
directly by concerned power agencies. No further appropriations 
will be made to this project. 
9. Includes local interest contribution of $27,563. 
10. Includes local interests contribution of $5,000. 
11. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 375, 64th Cong. 
1st sess. 
12. Annual Report for Detroit District. 
13. Construction of compensating works as authorized by 193 
R&H Act was authorized by Congress in August 1977. 
14. Includes $271,380 for previous projects. Excludes $57,00 
contributed funds. 
15. Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 
16. Includes $56,616 for previous projects. Excludes $181,50 
contributed funds. 
17. Excludes $3,261,375 contributed funds. 
18. Includes $361,772 for previous projects. 
19. Excludes $593,216 contributed funds. 
20-47

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 20-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 33 of Text) 
For Last Cost to 
Full Report September 30, 1995 
See Annual Operations and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Hamlin Beach State Park, NY Completed 1976 $ 1,769,600 
Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH Completed 1987 1,741,1252 
Selkirk Shore State Park, 
Lake Ontario, NY' Completed 1963 58,978 $ 307 
1. Federal participation was limited to one-third of first cost when 2. Does not include $739,700 contributed funds. 
project was authorized by 1954 River and harbor Act. Federal 
participation was changed from one-third to 70 percent of 
remaining work under Public Law 87-874. 
20-48

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
TABLE 20-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 40 of Text) 
For Last Cost to 
Full Report September 30, 1995 
See Annual Operations and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Auburn, NY, Owasco Outlet Completed 1962 $ 371,9853 
Batavia and vicinity, 
Tonawanda Creek, NY Completed 1957 335,385 
Camp Perry, OH Completed 19678 275,0007 
Cayuga Creek, 
Cheektowaga, NY2 Completed 1984 1,404,500 
Cuyahoga River Basin, OH Active 1985 1,117,000 
Dansville and vicinity, 
Canaseraga Creek, NY Active 1985 490,300 
Fremont, OH, Sandusky River Completed 1976 8,589,8246 
Ithaca, Cayuga Inlet, NY Completed 1978 3,929,3009 
Lackawanna, NY, Smokes Creek Completed 1971 3,542,0684 
Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, NY Completed 1954 797,300 
Marsh Creek, Geneva, NY Completed - 226,429 
Montour Falls, 
Oswego River Basin, NY Completed 1954 1,681,785 
Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, NY 2 Completed 1964 330,231 
Ottawa, OH Deferred 1989 374,000 
Owasco Inlet and Outlet, 
Montville and Dry Creek, 
State Ditch and Crane Inactive 
Brook, NY' Deferred 1950 281,559 
Point Place, Toledo, OH Completed 1990 9,885,733" 
Scajaquada Creek, NY Completed 1985 4,944,852 
Syracuse, Oswego River 
Basin, NY Completed 1954 3,349,248 
Warsaw, NY, Oatka Creek 2 Completed 1969 558,3175 
Wellsville, NY, Genesee River Completed 1978 3,145,30310 
1. In-active portion of work for State Ditch has been done by local 
interest and work on Crane Brook has been deferred at the request 
of local interests. 
2. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 
3. Excludes costs of $188,732 under Public Law 88-99, Flood 
Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for 
project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, 
June 1972. 
4. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. 
5. Excludes costs of $26,807 under Public Law 84-99, Flood 
Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for 
project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, 
June 1972. 
6. Includes local interests contribution of $6,944. Excludes cost of 
$383,786 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastal 
Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency 
restoration of levees damaged during 1973. 
7. Includes local interest contribution of $125,000. 
8. Annual Report for Detroit District. 
9. Includes local interests contribution of $99,000. 
Excludes costs of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99. 
Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies 
Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a 
result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 
10. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. 
Excludes costs of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, 
Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies 
Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a 
result of damages due to storms. 
11. Excludes $1,871,631 in contributed funds. 
20-49

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 20-G NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
(See Section 30 of Text) 
Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 
(Preauthorization) 
Fiscal Year 
Study Identification Cost $ 
Lake Erie, Cooley Canal, Lucas, OH 54,8601 
Rochester Harbor, NY 634,872 
'Does not include $51,482 contributed funds. 
TABLE 20-H FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
(See Section 41 of Text) 
Flood Control Activities pursuant to Sec. 205 
Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) 
Study Identification Fiscal Year 
Cost $ 
Chagrin River, Gates Mills, OH 6,500 
Cross Lake, NY 154,236' 
Grand River, Fairport, OH 13,445 
Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, NY 129,674 
Mill Creek, Garfield Heights, OH 9,863 
Pepper Creek, Pepper Pike, OH 10,000 
West Branch, Limestone Creek, Manlius, NY 150 
1. Does not include $85,966 in contributed funds. 
20-50

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
TABLE 20-H(Cont.)FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
(See Section 41 of Text) 
Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1986 Flood Control Act, 
Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) 
Fiscal Year 
Study Identification Cost $ 
Auglaize River, Paulding County, OH 6,022 
Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY 13,858' 
Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY 4,027 
Canaseraga Creek, Dansville, NY 1,437 
Cattaraugus Creek, Village of Arcade, NY 32132 
Chagrin River, East Branch, Sperry Rd., OH -1433 
Cuyahoga River, Brecksville Rd. OH 3374 
Domonkas Library, Sheffield, OH 79,2405 
Eighteenmile Creek, Boston, NY 567 
Ganargua Creek, Plasermill Rd., NY 3,420 
Genesee River., Back River Rd., Amity, NY 1,932 
Genesee River, Caneadea, NY 3,664 
Honeoye Creek, Mendon, NY 2,236 
Lake Erie, Hamburg, NY 3,318 
Lake Erie, Geneva Park, OH 934 
Lake Ontario, Sodus Point, Wayne County, NY 2,306 
Maumee River, Toledo, Oh 50 
Niagara Riverwalk, Buffalo, NY 3,548 
Route 531, Lake Erie, Ashtabula, City, OH 238 
Seneca Falls, NY 137,2296 
Tonawanda Creek, Niagara Co., NY 617 
Tonawanda Creek Road, Minnick, NY 2,150 
Tonawanda Creek, Niagara County, NY 477 
4. Does not include $-337 contributed funds. 
1. Does not include $-13,858 contributed funds. 5. Does not include $-11,282 in contributed funds. 
2. Does not include $-129 contributed funds. 6. Does not include $55,621 in contributed funds. 
3. Does not include $143 contributed funds. 
20-51

BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 
TABLE 20-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
(See Section 42 of Text) 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Date Funds Funds 
Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 
1935 R&H Act' 1962 Aug 1977- 
Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 
1954 R&H Act 1962 May 1981 - 
Buffalo Harbor Drift Removal, NY - Dec 1992 - 
Buffalo Ship Canal, Buffalo, NY - Dec 1992 - 
Caledonia, Genesee River, NY 1950 FC Act 1950 Jan 1990 - 
Cape Vincent Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1962 Nov 1986 - 
Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, NY 1944 FC Act 1948 Jan 1990 $ 12,464 
Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&H Act 19683 Nov 1979 - 
Dunkirk Harbor, NY WRDA 1986 Dec 1992 
Eastlake, Chagrin River, OH 1965 FC Act 1976 Jan 1990 506,344 
Edgewater Park, OH 1954 R&H Act - Jan 1990 - 
Elk Creek Harbor, PA 1966 R&H Act 1978 Dec 1992 101,500 
Erie Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act 1963 Nov 1981 -- 
Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1977 -- 
Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1982 -- 
Fairhaven Beach State Park, NY 1958 R&H Act - Jan 1990 -- 
Fort Niagara State Park, NY, Sec. 201 1965 FC Act - Jan 1990 -- 
Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 Aug 1977 1,524- 
Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1941 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1977 -- 
Hamlin Beach Harbor, NY 1968 R&H Act 1973 Jan 1990 72,052- 
Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 
1941 FC Act 1951 Nov 1983 29,000- 
Huron Harbor, OH 1962 R&H Act6 1963 Jan 1990 - 
Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug 1977 8,159- 
Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug 1977 12,300- 
Lorain Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act, modified by 1966 Jan 1990 -- 
1965 R&H Act4 
Maumee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act . 19713 Nov 1977 12,000- 
Niagara River, Compensating Works, 
1930 R&H Act 1964 Aug 1977 -- 
Ogdensburg Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act 1986 Nov 1986 -- 
Oswego Harbor, NY 1930 R&H Act 1963 Jan 1990 -- 
Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act4 1963 May 1981 - 
Port Bay, NY 1950 R&H Act - Jan 1990 - 
Red Creek, NY 1966 FC Act 1975 Nov 1986 361,241 
Sackets Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 May 1981 19,010 
Selkirk Shores State Park, OH 1954 R&H Act5 1963 Jan 1990 - 
Sheffield Lake Community Park, OH 1962 R&H Act - Aug 1977 - 
Watkins Glenn, NY 1941 FC Act 1958 Aug 1977 43,182 
White City Park, OH 1954 R&H Act - Jan 1990 - 
20-52

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
1. Extension of guide pier only; other improvements completed. 
2. Deepening of west outer harbor, other improvements 
completed. 
3. Annual Report for Detroit District. 
4. Uncompleted portion. 
5. Breakwater. 
20-53

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT *
The district is composed of the upper and lower 
peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin 
and Minnesota, which border the lakes. It includes U.S. 
waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and 
western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated, all depths 
stated in this report are referred to low water datum as 
follows: Lake Superior, 601.1 feet; Lake Michigan- 
Huron, 577.5 feet; Lake Erie, 569.2 feet; and Lake St. 
Clair, 572.3 feet. These elevations are in feet above the 
mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec - International 
Great Lakes Datum, 1985 (IGLD 1985). The IGLD 1985 
is a datum or reference system used to define water levels 
within the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River system. This 
datum was implemented in January 1992, officially 
replacing IGLD 1955. At the time IGLD 1955 was 
established, it was recognized that this datum would have 
to be periodically revised due to isostatic rebound. 
Isostatic rebound is the gradual rising or bouncing back of 
the earth's crust from the weight of the glaciers that 
covered the Great Lakes region during the last ice age. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation 
1. Algoma Harbor, WI .... 
2. Arcadia Harbor, MI .... 
3. Ashland Harbor, WI .... 
4. Bayport Harbor, MI... 
5. Big Bay Harbor, MI... 
6. Big Suamico River, WI . 
7. Black River, (Port Huron) 
8. Black River Harbor, (U.P. 
9. Bolles Harbor, MI .... 
10. Caseville Harbor, MI .. 
11. Cedar River Harbor, MI 
12. Charlevoix Harbor, MI . 
13. Cheboygan Harbor, MI . 
14. Clinton River, MI .... 
15. Cornucopia Harbor, WI. 
16. Detroit River, MI .... 
17. 
18. 
19. 
Duluth-Superior Harbor, M 
Fox River, WI ...... 
Frankfort Harbor, MI ... 
20. Grand Haven Harbor and t 
21. Grand Marais Harbor, MN 
22. Grand Traverse Bay Harbc 
23. Green Bay Harbor, WI . 
24. Greilickville Harbor, MI 
25. Hammond Bay Harbor, M 
26. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI 
27. Harrisville Harbor, MI . 
28. Holland Harbor, MI ... 
29. The Inland Route, MI .. 
30. Kenosha Harbor, WI .. 
31. Kewaunee Harbor, WI . 
32. Keweenaw Waterway, MI 
33. Lac La Belle Harbor, MI 
34. Lake St. Clair, Channels i 
Page 
............. 21-2 
............. 21-3 
............. 21-3 
............ 21-3 
............ 21-4 
........... 21-4 
MI .......... 21-4 
)MI ......... 21-5 
............. 21-5 
............. 21-6 
.............. 21-6 
............. 21-6 
............. 21-7 
............. 21-8 
............. 21-8 
............. 21-8 
4N and WI ..... .21-9 
............ 21-10 
............ 21-11 
Grand River, MI. 21-12 
S.......... 21-13 
)r, MI ........ 21-13 
............ 21-13 
............ 21-14 
I .......... 21-15 
........... 21-15 
............ 21-15 
............ 21-15 
............ 21-16 
............ 21-17 
............ 21-17 
........... 21-18 
............ 21-19 
n .......... 21-19 
Navigation (Continued) 
35. Leland Harbor, MI ...... 
36. Lexington Harbor, MI .... 
37. Little Lake Harbor, MI .... 
38. Ludington Harbor, MI .... 
39. Manistee Harbor, MI..... 
40. Manitowoc Harbor, WI .... 
41. Marquette Harbor, MI .... 
42. Menominee Harbor and River, 
43. Milwaukee Harbor, WI .... 
44. Monroe Harbor, MI .... 
45. Muskegon Harbor, MI ... 
46. New Buffalo Harbor, MI ... 
47. Oconto Harbor, WI ...... 
48. Ontonagon Harbor,MI .... 
49. Pensaukee Harbor, WI .... 
50. Pentwater Harbor, MI..... 
51. Point Lookout Harbor, MI .. 
52. Port Austin Harbor, MI.... 
53. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI ... 
54. Port Washington Harbor, WI 
55. Port Wing Harbor, WI .... 
56. Portage Lake Harbor, MI .. 
57. Presque Isle Harbor, MI ... 
58. Rouge River, MI ........ 
59. Saginaw River, MI....... 
60. St. Clair River, MI ...... 
61. St. Joseph Harbor, MI .... 
62. St. Marys River, MI...... 
63. Saugatuck Harbor and 
Kalamazoo River, MI .... 
64. Saxon Harbor, WI ....... 
65. Sheboygan Harbor, WI .... 
66. Silver Bay Harbor, MN .... 
67. South Haven Harbor, MI .. . 
Page 
......... 21-19 
......... 21-20 
......... 21-20 
.......... 21-21 
......... 21-21 
......... 21-22 
......... 21-23 
MI and WI . 21-23 
......... 21-24 
......... 21-25 
......... 21-26 
......... 21-26 
......... 21-27 
......... 21-27 
.......... 21-27 
......... 21-28 
......... 21-28 
......... 21-29 
......... 21-29 
......... 21-29 
......... 21-30 
......... 21-30 
......... 21-30 
......... 21-31 
......... 21-32 
......... 21-32 
......... 21-33 
......... 21-34 
......... 21-36 
......... 21-37 
......... 21-37 
......... 21-37 
......... 21-38 
21-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
Navigation (Continued) Page 
68. Sturgeon Bay and Lake 
Michigan Ship Canal, WI ........... 21-38 
69. Two Harbors, MN ................ 21-39 
70. Two Rivers Harbor, WI ............ 21-39 
71. White Lake Harbor, MI ............ 21-40 
72. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ... 21-40 
73. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... 21-40 
74. Navigation Work Under Special 
Authorization................... 21-40 
Beach Erosion Control 
75. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects. 21-41 
76. Emergency Shore Protection ......... 21-41 
77. Beach Erosion Work Under Special 
Authorization .................. 21-41 
78. Mitigation of Shore Damages ......... 21-41 
79. Project Modification for Improving the 
Quality of the Environment ......... 21-41 
Flood Control 
80. Clinton River Spillway, MI .......... 21-42 
81. Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN .......... 21-42 
82. Saginaw River, MI................ 21-43 
83. Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI ........ 21-45 
84. Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects ................ 21-45 
Navigation 
1. ALGOMA HARBOR, WI 
Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 68 
miles from Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal and about 
115 miles northerly from Milwaukee (See NOAA Nautical 
Chart 14910). 
Previous project. For details see page 1199 of Annual 
Report for 1958. 
Existing project. Provides for (a) a north pier 1,102 
feet long; (b) a south breakwater 1,530 feet long; (c) an 
entrance channel 14 feet deep and 200 feet wide from that 
depth in Lake Michigan and extending 800 feet landward; 
(d) a channel 14 feet deep in the Ahnapee River 80 to 175 
feet wide for 1,200 feet up to the Second Street Bridge; 
Flood Control (Continued) 
85. Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects ............... 
86. Flood Control Under Special 
Authorization ................. 
87. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters 
and International Water Studies ...... 
General Investigations 
88. Surveys....................... 
89. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .. 
90. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 
.
. 
. 
Tables 
Table 21-A Cost & Financial Statement ..... 21-51 
Table 21-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 21-75 
Table 21-C Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects.................. 21-91 
Table 21-D Not Applicable ................ 
Table 21-E Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects.................. 21-92 
Table 21-F Multiple Purpose Projects, including 
Power, St. Marys River, MI: 
Existing Project ............. 21-92 
Table 21-G Deauthorized Projects ......... .21-93 
Table 21-H Features of Existing Project ..... 21-95 
Table 21l-I Fox River, WI: Locks & Dams ... 21-96 
Table 21-J Reconnaissance & Condition 
Surveys.................. 21-97 
(e) an outer basin 14 feet deep, 600 feet long and 100 to 
500 feet wide. For a more detailed description see page 
1200 of Annual Report for 1958. 
Section 52(c) of the Water Resources Development Act 
(WRDA) of 1988 deauthorized the outer harbor basin 
feature of the navigation project. (See Table 21-B for 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal faciities. Consists of several fishing 
wharves. This harbor has one of the largest charter 
fishing fleets on the Great Lakes. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
21-2 
Page 
21-45 
21-45 
21-45 
21-49 
21-49 
21-50

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $13,403. 
Existing project was completed in 1909. Ahnapee River 
is navigable for about two miles from the mouth at a depth 
of four feet. Total cost of the existing project to end of 
FY was $1,661,630, of which $305,413 was for new 
work and $1,356,217 for maintenance. 
2. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI 
Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles 
northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 15 miles northerly 
from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907). 
Existing project. Provided for maintenance dredging of 
the existing harbor built by private interests, for a period 
of five years. The five years covered by this project were 
the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were 
also appropriated and maintenance was performed in 
calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915, inclusive. 
There is at present no approved project for the 
improvement of this harbor. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Dock facilities are considered 
adequate for existing recreational traffic. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces at a cost of $5,231. Safety maintenance performed 
by hired labor cost $2,307. A contract was awarded and 
completed this FY for maintenance dredging, removing 
3,896 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $26,480. 
Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision 
and administration cost $43,302. 
Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths 
of 5-12 feet exist in the channel at present. Maintenance 
of the harbor is based on providing a 9-foot depth. Piers 
and revetments are in excellent condition. Total cost of 
the existing project to end of FY was $4,610,084. 
3. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI 
Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south 
shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, 
MtN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) 
Existing project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep 
and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both all protected 
by an 8,000-foot breakwater. For dditional details see 
page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B 
for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet of 
waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling 
coal, ore, limestone, logs and pulpwood are served by 
railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been 
discontinued for the present. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $95,460. 
Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 
1950. Work authorized by 1960 Act was completed in 
November 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end 
of FY was $5,849,010, of which $1,695,645 was for new 
work and $4,153,365 was for maintenance. 
4. BAY PORT HARBOR, MI 
Location. On Wild Fowl Bay on east shore of Saginaw 
Bay about 10 miles south of Caseville, MI. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14863.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep 
and 50 feet wide extending 5,750 feet from 6-foot contour 
in Saginaw Bay to intersection of private service channels 
to be dredged by local interests. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Several small wharves used 
primarily by commercial fishermen. Facilities are 
considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys were performed by contract at a cost of 
$7,997. 
Existing project was completed in 1967. Total cost of 
the existing project to end of FY was $656,209, of which 
21-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
$93,597 was for new work and $562,612 for maintenance 
(which includes $137,399 contributed funds). 
5. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI 
Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 33 miles 
northwesterly from Marquette, MI, and 38 miles easterly 
from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14964.) 
Existing project. Provides for two converging piers 
extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers 
and rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet 
in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. For 
details see page 1009 of Annual Report for 1965 and page 
1261 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. A State-owned launching ramp and 
dock for small craft. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces and contract at a cost of $4,799. 
A contract was awarded and completed this FY for 
maintenance dredging, removing 9,977 cubic yards of 
shoal niaterial at a cost of $46,101. Engineering, design, 
surveys, and supervision and administration cost $38,964. 
Project was completed in June 1961 except for 
protection at inner end of east breakwater, completed in 
November 1961. Total cost of the existing project to end 
of FY was $1,870,586, of which $390,433 was for new 
work and $1,480,153 for maintenance. The new work 
cost does not include $56,500 contributed funds. 
6. BIG SUAMICO RIVER, WI 
Location. A small stream which flows easterly into 
Green Bay, an arm of Lake Michigan. Mouth of the river 
is about 8 miles north of Green Bay Harbor, and about 44 
miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) 
Existing project. An entrance channel 8 feet deep 
which extends from that depth in Green Bay to 1,800 feet 
above the river mouth, with widths of 100 feet in bay and 
60 feet in river; total length of channel is about 3,700 
feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Small private wharves along lower 
1.5 miles of river, used by'ocal fishing interests. Ample 
space is available for additional fishing wharves when 
required. Facilities considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and 
reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of 
$14,969. An adjustment in the amount of -$10,751 was 
made in supervision and administration cost for FY 93 
maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. 
Existing project was completed in 1938. Dredging 
channel was started in September 1938 and completed in 
November 1938. Total cost of the existing project to end 
of FY was $1,214,561, of which $20,243 was for new 
work and $1,194,318 for maintenance. 
7. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI 
Location. This river has its source in the northern part 
of Sanilac County, MI, is about 60 miles long, and flows 
in a southeasterly direction into the St. Clair River. (See 
NOAA Nautical chart 14852.) 
9 S 
Previous project. For details see page 1441 of Annual 
Report for 1916, and page 1554 of Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 20 feet deep 
from deep water in St. Clair River to the Grand Trunk 
Western Railroad Bridge, 160 feet wide at the mouth, 
decreasing to 100 feet, about 800 feet from the mouth, 
thence 100 feet wide for 2,600 feet, decreasing to 75 feet 
for a distance of 4,800 feet; widening two bends to 100 
feet, one at the foot of 12th Street, and the other below 
the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge; for a settling 
basin 75 feet wide and 20 feet deep, beginning at the 
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge in Port Huron and 
extending upstream a distance of about 2,300 feet; and 
then for a distance of 2.6 miles as a 100-foot wide river 
channel, 8 feet deep to the 1-94 bridge where it decreases 
to 6 feet deep and continues to the vicinity of the Black 
River Drainage Canal with suitable widening where 
required at bends in the channel. The project modification 
21-4

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
authorized by the Act of Aug. 30, 1935, is considered to 
be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost for 
new work. The cost of this modification was last revised 
in 1954 and was estimated to be $194,000 exclusive of 
$194,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 
21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are docks on both sides of 
Black River near its mouth, and between these docks and 
the upper limit of improvement there are 5 other docks 
varying in length from 100 to 500 feet. All docks are 
privately owned and are restricted to the use of the 
owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. Public recreational boating facilities 
constructed by the State and local agencies are available, 
as are privately owned and operated marinas. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and 
reports performed by Government forces and contract cost 
$86,291. 
All work, except that authorized by Act of August 30, 
1935, and the latest modification, has been completed. 
Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$2,274,820, of which $830,165 was for new work 
(includes $349,921 contributed funds) and $1,444,655 for 
maintenance. 
8. BLACK RIVER HARBOR (UPPER 
PENINSULA), MI 
Location. At mouth of Black River on south shore of 
Lake Superior 39 miles westerly from Ontonagon, MI, 
and 47 miles easterly from Ashland, WI. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14965.) 
Existing project. Two converging breakwaters, an 
entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, 
and an irregular harbor basin. For additional details see 
page 1092 of Annual Report for 1966. Project depths are 
12 feet in the approach channel and 8 feet in the river 
channel and basin. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local 
interests furnished easements on 0.85 acre of land. 
Terminal facilities. Wharves constructed on both sides 
of river. Wharf on east bank has frontage of 400 feet; on 
west bank, a frontage of 750 feet. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces and contract at a cost of $29,978. 
A contract was awarded and completed this FY, removing 
5,208 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $47,089. 
Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and 
administration cost $59,656. 
Project was completed in June 1958. Total cost of the 
existing project to end of FY was $1,377,899, of which 
$383,350 was for new work and $994,549 was for 
maintenance. The new work cost does not include 
$30,000 contributed funds. 
9. BOLLES HARBOR, MI 
Location. On west shore of Lake Erie at mouth of La 
Plaisance Creek 7 miles southwest of Monroe, MI. (See 
NOAA Nautical Chart 14846.) 
Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel in 
Lake Erie, 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from deep water 
to a point opposite the outer end of existing jetty, thence 
widening to 100 feet at creek mouth; an access channel in 
La Plaisance Creek, 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide at the 
mouth widening to 120 feet and extending to the first 
bend, thence narrowing to 50 feet wide and continuing at 
that width to the La Plaisance Road bridge; a steel sheet 
pile revetment, about 200 feet long, located along 
Michigan State Conservation Department property on west 
side of channel at creek mouth. Project also provides for 
inclusion of existing 400-foot long steel sheet pile jetty 
constructed by Michigan State Waterways Commission at 
the mouth of La Plaisance Creek. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. The Monroe Boat Club and three 
marinas provide facilities adequate for existing recreational 
boat traffic. There is also a public launching ramp and 
parking area at the Conservation Department fishing site 
at creek mouth. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys, confined disposal facility monitoring, 
21-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces and contract at a cost of $31,533. 
A contract was awarded and completed this FY, removing 
30,060 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of 
$219,987. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision 
and administration cost $73,920. 
The existing project was completed in 1970. Total cost 
of the existing project to end of FY was $4,063,349, of 
which $472,916 was for new work (includes $255,000 
contributed funds) and $3,590,433 for maintenance. 
10. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI 
Location. At mouth of Pigeon River on south shore of 
Saginaw Bay about 17 miles southwest of Port Austin, 
MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14860.) 
Existing project. A small craft harbor of refuge 
consisting of a breakwater protected channel extending 
from the 10-foot contour in Saginaw Bay into Pigeon 
River. ,Project depths are 10 and 8 feet. For additional 
details see page 1320 of Annual Report for 1963. 
Widening river channel from 50 to 60 feet for about 1,000 
feet, with widening to 80 feet in upper 300-foot reach, is 
considered inactive. Estimated (1963) cost of this portion 
of project is $30,000 (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Complete public boating facilities 
constructed by State and local agencies are available in 
addition to privately owned and operated marinas. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys, environmental studies, and 
miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by 
Government forces and contract at a cost of $59,923. A 
contract for maintenance dredging was awarded this FY in 
the amount of $179,766. Dredging will begin next FY. 
Engineering and design cost $81,294. 
The existing project was completed in 1964 except for 
the inactive portion of the project. Total cost of the 
existing project to end of FY was $2,078,478, of which 
$587,314 was for new work (including $293,657 
contributed funds) and $1,491,164 for maintenance. 
11. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI 
Location. At mouth of Cedar River on west shore of 
Green Bay, an arm of Northern Lake Michigan, about 68 
miles north of City of Green Bay. Nearest harbors are 
Menominee, MI, 27 miles southwest and at Escanaba, MI, 
20 miles northeast. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14909.) 
Existing project. Two parallel entrance piers, a west 
pier 230 feet long and a rubblemound east pier 875 feet 
long with a sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel 
100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Green 
Bay to mouth of Cedar River about 900 feet long; and 
inner channel in Cedar River 1,400 feet long, 80 feet 
wide, and 8 feet deep upstream to about 150 below State 
Route 35 bridge; and a turning basin 150 feet wide near 
upstream end of inner bridge channel. (See Table 21-B 
for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. No local sponsor has been 
identified. The State of Michigan is awaiting completion 
of the limited Re-evaluation Report. 
Terminal facilities. There are no permanent docking, 
mooring or handling facilities. 
Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: A 
total of $172,339 was expended this FY to initiate a 
limited Re-evaluation Report to re-evaluate project cost 
and economic justification, and to initiate identification of 
a local sponsor. 
Total cost to end of FY were $387,339. 
12. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI 
Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 276 miles 
northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 75 miles northerly 
from Frankfort, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) 
Existing project. A channel 24 feet deep in Lake 
Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower 
and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake 
Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected 
where needed by piers and revetments. For additional 
details see page 1476 of Annual Report for 1962. (See 
Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Section 25 of the 
WRDA of 1988 provides authorization pertaining to the 
South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor. It states, "The 
Secretary shall take such action as may be necessary to 
restore recreational uses established prior to May 1, 1988, 
or provide comparable recreation uses at the South Pier to 
Charlevoix Harbor project, Charlevoix, Michigan in order 
21-6

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
to mitigate any adverse impact on recreational uses 
resulting from reconstruction of the South Pier..." 
Local cooperation. None required except the latest 
project modification is subject to the following: Provide 
without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and 
rights-of-ways required for construction and subsequent 
maintenance of the modified project upon the request of 
the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas 
determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the 
general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal 
of ekcavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, 
bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such 
retaining works; hold and save the United States free from 
damages due to the constructing and maintenance of the 
modified project, except for damages due to the fault or 
negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide 
and maintain without cost to the United States depths in 
berthing areas and local access channels serving the 
terminal commensurate with the depths provided in the 
related project areas; accomplish, without cost to the 
United States, such alterations of submarine utility 
crossing as are required by the modified project; establish 
regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the 
waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations 
shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations 
of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for 
pollution prevention and control; if acquiring lands, 
easements and rights-of-ways for construction of the 
project, local interests will comply with the applicable 
provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real 
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1971; PL 91-646, 
approved January 2, 1971; contribute all costs in excess of 
$1,000,000 should the total cost of construction of the 
general navigation facilities exceed that amount, in 
accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 
River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of 
construction (1975) is estimated at $625,000. 
Terminal facilities. Several small landing places in 
Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish and 
miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum 
products at west end of Lake Charlevoix, and coal 
wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne 
City, and East Jordan provide public docks for small craft. 
Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations 
Condition and 
inspections and 
during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
reports were performed by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $42,180. Safety 
maintenance performed by hired labor cost $6,485. 
Entrance channel obstruction removal was performed 
using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of 
$195,860. Supervision and administration cost $1,297. 
Existing project was completed in 1939 except for the 
latest modification. Total cost of the existing project to 
end of FY was $10,820,040, of which $180,623 was for 
new work, $9,510,021 for maintenance (Bank Stabilization 
$46,352), and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation. 
13. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI 
Location. At mouth of Cheboygan River which empties 
into Western Lake Huron about 16 miles southeast of the 
Straits of Mackinac Bridge. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 
14881 and 14886.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1956 of Annual 
Report for 1915, and page 1546 of Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existing project. A channel 21 feet deep and 200 feet 
wide from 21-foot contour in Lake Huron to outer end of 
west pier; thence, between lines parallel to and 25 feet 
from the docks, 21 feet deep from this point to East First 
Street and thence 18.5 feet deep and 60 feet wide from 
this bridge to the lock Cheboygan River; a turning basin 
21 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 420 to 770 feet long on 
east side of existing project channel just below East First 
Street; and rubblemound breakwater about 775 feet long 
on the site of existing west pier at mouth of river. Project 
is 12,000 feet long, of which about 6,000 feet are in 
Straits of Mackinac. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves 
used for receiving coal, stone and petroleum products. 
Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the 
Sate and local agencies are available. These facilities 
satisfy existing commerce and vessel traffic. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and 
reports were performed by Government forces and 
contract at a cost of $57,112. 
21-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
Total costs to end of FY were $1,492,529 of which 
$504,236 was for new work and $988,293 for 
maintenance. 
14. cLINTON RIVER, MI 
Location. Has its sources in Oakland County, MI, 
flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay 
in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14850.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual 
Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existing project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 
8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in the 
bay, gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 
feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of 
about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide 
in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel 
upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old 
channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing 
Catfish Channel; construction of revetments as needed in 
the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in 
area at entrance along bay channel, protected by 
breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 21-B 
for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. River is used exclusively by 
recreational craft. There are numerous public and private 
wharves along the river below the city. They are 
considered adequate. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and 
reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of 
$28,677. Maintenance of the disposal area performed by 
hired labor cost $13,766. 
Existing project was completed in 1966. Total cost of 
the existing project to end of FY was $7,851,949, of 
which $549,798 was for new work (includes $289,752 
contributed funds) and $7,302,151 for maintenance. 
15. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI 
Location. At mouth of Siskiwit River on south shore of 
Lake Superior, 49 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See 
NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) 
Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 
between piers; an irregular-shaped turning basin; two 
inner channels, and reconstruction and Federal 
maintenance of deflection dike and entrance piers 
constructed by local interests. Project depths are 10 feet 
between piers and 8 feet in turning basin and inner 
channels. For additional details see page 1010 of Annual 
Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. About 1,000 linear feet of privately 
owned docking space is available. 
Operations during fiscal year. o Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces at a cost of $50,368. 
Work authorized by earlier Act was completed in 1939. 
Work authorized in 1954 was completed in 1963. Total 
cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,520,910, 
of which $462,653 was for new work and $1,058,257 for 
maintenance. 
16. DETROIT RIVER, MI 
Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 
31 miles long, flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake 
Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual 
Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existing project. Improving Detroit River main 
channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving 
certain auxiliary and side channels; and construction of 
various water level and crosscurrent control structures. 
Details are in accompanying Table 21-H. Project depths 
are referred to local low water datum planes which 
correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and 
Erie, 572.3 and 569.2 feet above mean water level at 
Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
21-8

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. No local 
. operation is required for modifications authorized by 
Acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The uncompleted 
portion of the project authorized by the 1946 and the 1956 
R & H Acts, construction of the Compensating Works, 
with the uncompleted portion of the Trenton Channel 
modification approved Aug. 13, 1968, were deauthorized 
Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the 
WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). 
Terminal facilities. Numerous commercial installations 
used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, 
petroleum products, and other items such as overseas 
general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities 
is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and 
published by the Water Resources Support Center. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, environmental studies, 
confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water 
control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were 
performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of 
$1,770,108. Location and removal of obstructions was 
performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge HURON and the 
U.S. Cranebarge VELER at a cost of $1,417,484. 
Maintenance of disposal area performed by hired labor 
cost $65,982. Engineering and design for expansion of 
the confined disposal facility, cell #3, continued at a cost 
of $39,392. An adjustment of $42,097 was made in 
contract cost for the FY93 maintenance dredging of Pointe 
Mouillee channel completed last FY. A contract for 
maintenance dredging Pointe Mouillee channel was 
awarded this FY in the amount of $464,000. The contract 
was 94% complete at the end of FY, removing 71,679 
cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $429,734. 
Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and 
administration cost $258,028. 
Latest modification of connecting channels project in the 
Detroit River is complete except for compensating works. 
Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at 
end of FY are set forth in Table 21-H. Total cost of the 
existing project to end of FY was $229,732,901, of which 
$76,877,357 was for new work ($75,346,669 regular 
funds and $1,530,688 Public Works Funds) and 
$152,855,544 (includes $361,235 Section 150 contributed 
funds) for maintenance. 
17. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN 
AND WI 
Location. At extreme western end of Lake Superior. 
Cities of Duluth, MN, and Superior, WI, are on north and 
south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14975.) 
Previous projects. See page 1246 of Annual Report for 
1962. 
Existing project. Provides for rebuilding canal piers at 
Duluth entry, replacement or construction of piers and 
breakwater at Superior entry and dredging approaches and 
channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis 
River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in 
entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and 
are from 20 to 23 feet deep in inner channels. (See Table 
21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
For details of authorized channel dimensions and 
dimensions of structures, see pages 1246 and 1247 of 
Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report 
for 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first 
Avenue West channel was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in 
accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 
99-662). 
The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to the 
project to deepen the western portions of North and South 
Channels, the entire Upper Channel and the Minnesota 
Channel to 27 feet LWD; widen the Cross Channel to 
provide a minimum turning basin of 1,500 feet; widen the 
bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet; and 
construct an upland confined disposal facility. The current 
recommended plan involves only the mechanical dredging 
of the Cross Channel Turning Basin with disposal at the 
Erie Pier CDF. The remainder of the project is now 
unscheduled. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly 
authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are 
as described in House Document 150, 86th Congress, 1st 
Session and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, 
construction cost sharing. 
Terminal facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals 
including some 54 major ones; all but one privately 
owned. Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, 
petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, 
and grain are believed adequate for most existing 
commerce. 
21-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: An 
adjustment of 2,759 cubic yards and $274,325 was made 
in contract cost for widening the Cross Channel completed 
last FY. Engineering, design, and supervision and 
administration cost $29,457. Of the funds expended, 
$218,357 was contributed by the Seaway Port Authority 
of Duluth. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of 
the museum was performed by Government forces and 
contract at a cost of $449,196. Operation and 
maintenance of service facilities and park pier performed 
by hired labor cost $214,672. Condition surveys, 
environmental studies, confined disposal facility 
monitoring, support of water control center, and 
miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by 
Government forces and contract at a cost of $371,788. 
Development of dredged material management plans 
continued at a cost of $217,871. Duluth and Superior 
Entry Breakwater repairs were performed using the U.S. 
Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $600,953. Safety 
maintenance performed by hired labor cost $95,705. 
Obstruction removal performed by hired labor cost $409. 
Maintenance of the disposal area cost $6,782. 
Engineering and design for expansion of the existing 
confined disposal facility continued at a cost of $16. An 
adjustment of -83,935 cubic yards and -$103,952 was 
made in contract cost for maintenance dredging and 
widening of the navigation channel completed last FY. A 
contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and 
completed this FY, removing approximately 84,435 cubic 
yards of shoal material at a cost of $623,610. 
Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and 
administration cost $424,536. 
Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 
June 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer 
harbor, included in House Document 150, was completed 
in June 1965. Work in the inner harbor, included in 
House Document 196, started in May 1963, was 
completed in November 1968 except for 21st Avenue 
West channel portion which was deauthorized December 
31, 1989. Of the work authorized in WRDA 1986, only 
the Cross Channel dredging has been completed 
(September 1994). All other authorized improvements are 
unscheduled. 
The United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in 
Minnesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for 
a vessel yard. Totalost of the existing project to end of 
FY was $92,319,496, of which $17,226,343 was for new 
work (includes $331,685 contributed funds), $63,537,743 
for maintenance, and $11,555,410 for rehabilitation. 
18. FOX RIVER, WI 
Location. Rises in Columbia County, WI, and flows 
about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, 
physically a main river but by designation a tributary of 
Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, WI and 
flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for 
Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) 
Previous projects. See page 1368 of Annual Report for 
1962. 
Existing project. Deepening and widening channel of 
Fox River from DePere 7 miles above mouth to 
confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to 6 
feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below DePere lock and 7 
feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha 
lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 
dams; a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction 
and maintenance of harbors having depths of 6 feet on 
Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, 
with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, 
snagging, and otherwise improving Wolf River 47 miles 
from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. 
Cost of completed portion of project is $513, 424 for the 
lower river exclusive of previous projects. The 
uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the River 
and Harbor Act of 1925, was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, 
in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 
(PL 99-662). Section 332 of the WRDA of 1992 
authorized the transfer of the navigation system to the 
State of WI subject to agreement; however, water 
regulation and dam operation will be continued by the 
Federal government. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are, in 
general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 21-I on 
locks and dams, Fox River, WI.) 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: An 
adjustment of $484 was made in cost for the 
archaeological study for disposal completed last FY. 
Condition surveys, environmental activities, safety 
training, miscellaneous inspections and reports, and plans 
for flood emergencies were performed at a cost of 
$667,567. Water control studies, monitoring and 
regulation of water levels were performed at a cost of 
21-10

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
$236,901. Real Estate activities were performed at a cost 
of $47,533. Federal canal banks at various locations were 
repaired at a cost of $119,750. The operation and 
maintenance of nine (9) dams and ten (10) overflow weirs 
and caretaker status maintenance of seventeen (17) locks 
and two (2) guard locks totaled $768,515. Major 
miscellaneous items of supply totaled $133,784. 
Engineering and design for new gate hoist and electrical 
rehabilitation at nine (9) dams continued at a cost of 
$132,293. Supervision and administration costs were 
$164,742. 
Existing project is complete except for the inactive 
portion. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams 
have been rebuilt. (See Table 21-I for year of completion 
of each). Structures and dredging in pools have increased 
original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining 
to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion 
of Wolf River, and rock removal and deepening of 
Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer 
consid- ered necessary. Existing dams are generally fair 
to good; but many of the locks are in extremely poor 
condition. Repairs are not scheduled because the project 
is in caretaker status. Total cost of the existing project to 
end of FY was $55,279,135, of which $3,753,334 was for 
new work and $51,525,801 for operation and 
maintenance. Funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were 
expended between July 5, 1884, and June 30, 1935, on 
operation and care of works of improvement under 
provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such 
purposes. 
19. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI 
Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles 
northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 28 miles northerly 
from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) 
Existing project. Provides for constructing an exterior 
basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 
feet apart at the outer ends, diverging at an angle of about 
90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north 
breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and 
the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 
1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 
feet of north pier and 1,172 feet of south pier; dredging 
basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, 
decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, 
dredging approach and entrance channel through outer 
basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake 
Michigan to a point500 feet landward of opening between 
breakwaters, over the entire width outside the 
breakwaters; thence to maximum width of 500 feet inside 
the breakwaters and to 23 feet deep through inner portion 
of outer basin to outer end of north pier, over widths 
decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet 
deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; 
dredging an 18-foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie 
from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and 
extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary 
and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north 
and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly 
boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 
feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward 
of the east limit of the interior basin, with its north side in 
line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and 
shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling 
capped with concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built 
of stonefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with 
concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which 
consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore 
and several docks along north shore of Lake Betsie. The 
City and State provide a recreational docking facility on 
north side of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal 
terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling 
small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces and contract at a cost of $80,339. 
Repairs to the North and South Breakwater, Sections A, 
B, and C, North Pier, Sections K1-M1, and South Pier, 
Sections P and C were completed using the U.S. 
Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $26,537. Safety 
maintenance performed by hired labor cost $7,883. The 
contract awarded last FY for repair of the South 
Connector, Sections C, F-I, was completed this FY at a 
cost of $644,116. Engineering and design during 
construction cost $13,515. Real estate and supervision 
and administration cost $66,338. 
Existing project was completed in 1939, with exception 
of the latest modification which was completed in 1969. 
Navigation structures are in fair condition and are 
programmed for major repairs. For additional details on 
21-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual 
Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end 
of FY was $13,249,549, of which $1,955,159 (includes 
$31,70. contributed funds) was for new work, 
$11,019,614 for maintenance, and $274,776 for 
rehabilitation. 
20. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND 
GRAND RIVER, MI 
Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 
108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles 
northerly from Holland, MI. River rises in Jackson 
County, MI, and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake 
Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and 
Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1949 of Annual 
Report for 1915, and page 1481 of Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existing project. An entrance channel protected by 
parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a 
deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a 
turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river 
extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project 
depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to 
turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and channel to 
Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. 
For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 
1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is 
considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) 
is $38,600. The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications 
to deepen the harbor entrance and river channels to 29 and 
27 feet, respectively; and provides for a new and larger 
turning basin. Estimated cost (Oct 90) is $20,400,000, 
which includes $11,754,000 Federal and $8,646,000 non- 
Federal. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
portions of project. Local cooperation items for the newly 
authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are 
as described in House Document 661, 76th Congress, 3d 
Session, and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, 
construction cost sharing requirements as follows: 
a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of 
construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of 
aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at 
$4,246,000. The estimated cash contribution of 
$4,246,000 to be paid in lump sum, prior to initiation of 
construction, or in annual installments during the 
construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed 
or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by 
the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement 
satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final 
apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have 
been determined; and 
b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years 
following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost 
of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount 
presently estimated at $2,040,000. The Secretary of the 
Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent 
repayment, the amount of the local contribution of lands, 
easements, rights-of-ways, dredged/demolition material 
disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs 
to count against the cash payment during construction, and 
in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of 
project cost. 
Terminal facilities. Several wharves exist for handling 
coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum products, fish, 
and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry 
slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies 
provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all 
on equal terms. Facilities are considered adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, confined disposal facility 
monitoring, environmental studies, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $281,231. Development 
of dredged material management plans continued at a cost 
of $100,050. Engineering and design for North 
Revetment, Section F, repairs continued at a cost of 
$24,218. Engineering and design was initiated for repair 
of the boardwalk at a cost of $1,532. Repairs to the 
North and South Pier, Sections H & Hi, were performed 
using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of 
$95,930. Minor structure repairs performed by hired 
labor cost $52,771. A contract was awarded and 
completed this FY for maintenance dredging the outer 
harbor, removing 23,858 cubic yards of shoal material at 
a cost of $107,089. This contract was also for Section 
111 beach nourishment. Another contract was awarded 
for maintenance dredging of the Grand River in the 
amount of $856,125. Dredging will begin next FY. 
Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision anA 
administration cost $229,376. Monitoring in connection 
with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost 
21-12

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
of $34,589. Miscellaneous inspections and reports cost 
$4,830. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above 
maintenance dredging outer harbor contract cost $26,772. 
Supervision and administration under Section 111 cost 
$432. 
Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. 
For additional details on completion of existing project see 
page 1463 of Annual Report for 1982. Structures are in 
a general state of deteriorating condition and are scheduled 
for repairs. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY 
was $33,220,075, of which $1,458,469 was for new 
work, $30,947,993 for maintenance (includes $15,585 
contributed funds), and $813,613 for rehabilitation. 
21. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN 
Location. On north shore of Lake Superior, 106 miles 
northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical 
Chart 14967.) 
Existing project. Provides breakwater piers to narrow 
the entrance; concrete seawalls across ledge at southeast 
corner of harbor; an anchorage area and a small-boat 
basin protected by a rubblemound breakwater. Project 
depths are 16 feet in anchorage area increasing to 20 feet 
near entrance and 8 feet in small-boat basin. For 
additional details see page 1014 of Annual Report for 
1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Two inactive pulpwood wharves 
and several fish wharves, all privately owned. Facilities 
are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $29,076. Repairs to West 
Breakwater, Section D, and East Breakwater, Section E, 
were completed using the U.S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN 
at a cost of $43,861. 
Existing project is complete. Total costs of the existing 
project to end of FY was $2,821,409, of which $450,972 
was for new work and $2,370,437 for maintenance. 
22. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, 
MN 
Location. At mouth of Traverse River on eastern shore 
of Keweenaw Peninsula about 20 miles northeasterly from 
Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14964.) 
Existing project. Provides two parallel piers, an 
entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. 
Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in 
basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. 
For additional details see page 1015 of Annual Report for 
1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
interests furnished easements on 5.1 acres of land. 
Local 
Terminal facilities. Several privately owned fishing 
wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $18,590. A contract was 
awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging, 
removing 9,248 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of 
$70,218. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision 
and administration cost $34,973. 
Existing project was completed in 1950 except for 
extension of north pier completed in 1964. Steel cells and 
piers are in good condition. Total cost of existing project 
to end of FY was $2,281,624, of which $261,299 was for 
new work and $2,020,325 for maintenance. 
23. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI 
Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green 
Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, WI, via Sturgeon 
Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee 
Harbor, MI and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14918.) 
Previous projects. See page 1366 of Annual Report for 
1962. 
Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual 
Report, Table 30-C, page 30-30. 
For more detailed description of project see page 1216 
of Annual Report for 1963. 
21-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
Cost of completed portion of project is $9,335,000 
Federal, and non-Federal cost is $490,000 including 
$100,000 contributed funds. Local interests requested that 
the inactive portion of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, 
consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet 
downstream of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway 
Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be 
reactivated and the authorization modified to include 
deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the 
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to provide 
increased horizontal clearance. Estimated cost of this 
portion (1990) is $6,130,000; $4,030,000 Federal and 
$2,100,000 non-Federal which includes $1,970,000 local 
contribution. Section 601c of the WRDA of 1986 
authorized deepening the Fox River Channel, Green Bay, 
WI, to 27 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing 
project. 
Terminal facilities. There are 16 wharves for handling 
coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general 
overseas cargo and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities 
are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $316,834. An adjustment 
of $202,791 was made in survey costs (for previous FYs) 
performed by the Survey Vessel David Boyd. An 
adjustment of -$2,578 was made in cost for maintenance 
of the disposal area performed last FY. A contract was 
awarded this FY for maintenance dredging the outer 
harbor in the amount of $724,300. The contract was 62% 
complete at the end of FY, removing approximately 
90,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of 
$448,399. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, 
supervision and administration cost $89,157. Engineering 
and design for construction of a confined disposal facility 
continued at a cost of $59,450. 
Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification 
was started in November 1966 and completed in 
September 1973, except for dredging the reach from 150 
feet downstream of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway 
Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge. Dredging of 
the turning basin above C & N.W. Railway Bridge was 
commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was 
enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the Rivers and 
Harbors Act of March 4, 1915, in order to provide 
sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work 
was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract 
in September and October 1973. East revetment at Grassy 
Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox 
River and entrance channel to Tail Point Light was 
completed in September 1967. Total cost of the existing 
project to end of FY was $51,353,337 ($50,412,538 
regular funds and $940,800 Public Works Funds), 
$9,946,395 for new work and $41,406,942 for 
maintenance. The new work cost does not include 
$100,000 contributed funds. 
24. GREILICKVILLE HARBOR, MI 
(formerly Traverse City Harbor) 
Location. On Lake Michigan at the south end of the 
West Arm of Grand Traverse Bay, about 45 miles 
southwesterly from Charlevoix and 29 miles northeasterly 
from Frankfort. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14913.) 
Existing project. Provides for dredging a basin 600 
feet wide and about 850 feet long with a depth of 14 feet 
in outer 350 feet of the area and a 10-foot depth in 
remainder, protected by a steel sheet pile breakwater about 
1,300 feet long with a 300-foot long rubblemound 
extension along a line bearing south 60 degrees west from 
outer end of steel structure and a detached rubblemound 
breakwater 420 feet long along south side of the basin. 
(See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. An existing public wharf (built in 
connection with the 1948 authorization), a boat launching 
ramp, and a small privately operated yacht harbor located 
beyond the limits of the existing project. The existing 
public wharf deteriorated from lack of maintenance and 
must be rebuilt. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys were performed by 
Government forces and contract at a cost of $8,761. 
Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $8,846. 
Existing project was completed in August 1951. The 
last modification was completed during FY 1967. 
Controlling depths are 14 feet in the outer basin and 10 
feet in the inner basin. Total cost of the existing project 
to end of FY was $643,120, of which $369,557 was for 
21-14

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
new work and $273,563 for maintenance. The new work 
does not include $121,000 contributed funds. 
25. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI 
Location. On northwest shore of Lake Huron, 35 miles 
southeast of Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical 
Chart 14881.) 
Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge, 
protected by breakwater structures, extending to 12-foot 
depth contour in the lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 
feet deep; and for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet 
deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Public facilities being planned by 
State and local agencies. Plans and specifications are 
complete, but construction has not started. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and 
reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of 
$6,593. An adjustment of -$2,099 was made in contract 
cost for the maintenance dredging completed last FY. 
Engineering, design, and supervision and administration 
cost $14,163. 
The existing project was completed in 1965. Total cost 
of the existing project to end of FY was $2,110,593, of 
which $1,092,366 was for new work, and $1,018,227 for 
maintenance. 
26. HARBORBEACHHARBOR,MI 
Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles 
north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14862.) 
Existing project. Harbor of refuge protected by three 
breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an 
anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see 
page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B 
for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Coal and limestone are received at 
a private wharf. In addition, there is a public recreational 
craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small 
installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft 
commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities 
satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and 
reports were performed by Government forces and 
contract at a cost of $35,679. 
Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional 
details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of 
Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project 
to end of FY was $16,364,479, of which $1,200,598 was 
for new work, $14,969,377 for maintenance, and 
$194,504 for rehabilitation. 
27. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI 
Location. On the west shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles 
north of Oscoda and 30 miles south of Alpena. (See 
NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) 
Existing project. A harbor of refuge protected by 
breakwater structures, and dredging an entrance channel 
12 feet deep and a harbor basin 10 feet deep. (See Table 
21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Dockage facilities built by State 
and local agencies for recreational craft; considered 
adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys, environmental studies, and 
miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by 
Government forces and contract at a cost of $15,179. An 
adjustment of $17,937 was made in contract cost for FY93 
maintenance dredging completed last FY. An adjustment 
of -$87 was made in supervision and administration cost 
for close-out of maintenance dredging contract. 
Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$4,006,719, of which $2,639,392 was for new work 
(includes $287,454 contributed funds) and $1,367,327 for 
maintenance. 
28. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI 
Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles 
northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles southerly 
21-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14932.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1948 of Annual 
Report for 1915, and page 1478 of Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existing project. An outer breakwater protected 
approach channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel 
to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a 
channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a 
turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion 
of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of 
inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in 
turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of 
Annual Report for 1962. 
The uncompleted portion of the project, widening bend 
of entrance channel into Lake Macatawa, was deauthorized 
Dec, 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the 
WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
portions of project. 
Terminal facilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake 
Macatawa and used for handling coal, building materials, 
petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. Two 
shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland 
provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are 
considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys, environmental studies, and 
miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by 
Governnent forces at a cost of $167,118. Development 
of dredged material management plans continued at a cost 
of $97,085. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor 
cost $12,284. A contract was awarded and completed for 
maintenance dredging the outer harbor, removing 
approximately 18,367 cubic yards of shoal material at a 
cost of $74,202. This contract was also for beach 
nourishment. Engineering, design, purveys, and 
supervision and administration cost $101,551. Monitoring 
in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was 
performed at a cost of $31,522. Miscellaneous inspections 
and reports cost $6,734. Beach nourishment in 
conjunction with the above maintenance dredging outer 
harbor contract cost $20,929. Supervision and 
administration under Section 111 cost $384. 
Existing project, with exception of widening bend in 
revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 
3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on 
completion of existing project, see page 1460 of Annual 
Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in fair to good 
condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY 
was $28,151,374, of which $1,392,827 was for new work 
($1,180,502 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project 
and $35,705 contributed funds), $26,256,095 for 
maintenance, and $502,452 for rehabilitation. 
29. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI 
Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams 
stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of 
Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan 
to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. 
Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the 
waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide 
and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, 
through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, 
and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of 
Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in 
Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. 
It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. 
The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief 
of Engineers on Sep. 2, 1964, to correct a design 
deficiency. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. None exist for commercial cargohandling 
along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous 
small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some 
equipped with covered boat wells for serving and storing 
recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings 
maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the 
public for transfer of passengers. Public docks are at 
Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the village of Indian 
River, Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett 
Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 highways dead end at 
water's edge, permitting public access for various marine 
activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for 
existing traffic. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The 
navigation lock was operated and maintained by the State 
of Michigan at no cost to the Government. In FY 95, the 
lock was operated from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. April 28- 
21-16

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
30, May 6, 7, 13, 14, 20 & 21, September 16-30. The 
lock was operated 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. May 26-29, 
June 1-30, September 1-15. The lock was operated from 
8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. July 1 - August 31. In October, 
the lock was open on weekends only from 9:00 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m. The lock closed at 5:00 p.m. on October 16. 
Water control activities at the lock and weir performed 
under cyntract by the State, of Michigan cost $7,000. 
Negotiations to turn over navigation portion of Crooked 
River Lock and Weir to the State of Michigan cost 
$14,805. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance 
dredging of Inland Route, Mullet Lake Entrance, 
Cheboygan Channel, Cheboygan, MI was completed 
removing approximately 976 cubic yards of shoal material 
at a cost of $24,999. Supervision and administration cost 
$1,873. Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections 
and reports were performed by Government forces at a 
cost of $80,398. 
The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock 
and dam was completed in FY 1968. For adjditional 
details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total 
cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,049,224, 
of which $918,222 was for new work (includes $148,000 
contributed funds) and $3,131,002 for maintenance. 
30. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI 
Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 
miles south of Milwaukee and about 54 �miles north of 
Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) 
Previous project. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 
1962. 
Existing project. For detailed description see page 
1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1986) Federal 
cost is $455,000 exclusive of amounts expended on 
previous projects, and $195,000 non-Federal which 
includes $155,000 local contribution. (See Table 21-B for 
authorization legislation.) 
The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 
1962 River and Harbor Act, dredging of 25-foot wide 
strips adjacent to the north and south piers, was 
deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 
1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Three wharves used for 
miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, 
and also several fish wharves. While these facilities are 
considered generally adequate for existing commerce, 
more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of 
available frontage for development of additional terminals 
should be made. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys, environmental studies, and 
miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by 
Government forces and contract at a cost of $32,278. 
Repairs to the North Detached Breakwater, Sections D&E, 
South Pier, Section N, and obstruction removal were 
performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at 
a cost of $105,136. Supervision and administration cost 
$4,621. 
Existing project is complete except for dredging 25-foot 
strips adjacent to the north and south piers which was 
deauthorized December 31, 1989. The north and south 
piers were completed in 1900 and the breakwater in 1909. 
Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$13,215,092 ($13,187,434 were regular funds and 
$27,658 Emergency Relief Funds), of which $988,969 
was for new work, $10,955,848 for maintenance, and 
$1,270,275 for rehabilitation. The new work cost does 
not include $3,000 contributed funds. 
31. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI 
Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 
miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 78 miles from 
Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth 
of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) 
Previous projects. See page 1375 of Annual Report for 
1962. 
Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual 
Report, Table 30-C, page 30-31. 
Costs of completed project are $603,021 Federal, and 
$9,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on 
previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated 
$200,000, July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is 
considered inactive, and excluded from present cost 
estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and 
Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B 
for authorizing legislation.) 
21-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum 
tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and 
several fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate 
for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces and contract at a cost of $75,948. 
Repairs to the North Detached Breakwater, Section H, 
were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge 
MANITOWOC at a cost of $86,102. An adjustment of 
$8,450 was made in survey costs (for previous FYs) 
performed by the Survey Vessel David Boyd. Safety 
maintenance performed by hired labor cost $6,113. 
Maintenance of the diked disposal facility was performed 
by hired labor and contract at a cost of $8,010. Real 
estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost 
$17,003. 
Active portion of existing project is complete. The 
north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining 
portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of 
the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction 
of north breakwater and shore connection, except for a 
gap of 150 feet about 830 feet from shoreward end, and 
removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier was 
commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 
1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in 
April/May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent 
channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck 
and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in October 1973 
and a 24-foot section at outlet end was subsequently 
removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 
feet. bredging entrance channel in interior basin to 
existing project depth was commenced in April and 
completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable 
to about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not 
more than 4 feet. Total cost of the existing project to end 
of FY was $11,163,283, of which $758,333 was for new 
work ($338,333 regular and $420,000 Emergency Relief 
Funds) $9,787,650 regular funds for maintenance and 
$617,300 regular funds for rehabilitation. 
32. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI 
Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula 
in upper peninsula of Michigan. The west entrance is 169 
miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14972.) 
Existing project. A navigable channel, minimum width 
300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially 
artificial, across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. 
For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. 
(See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
The uncompleted portion of the project for navigation at 
Keweenaw Waterway, Houghton County, MI, authorized 
by the River and Harbor Act of Aug. 30, 1935, PL 409, 
73rd Congress, which consists of extending the lower 
entrance breakwater by 2,000 feet, including the necessary 
alteration or replacement of structures due to channel 
deepening, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 
99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, 
and several general merchandise and miscellaneous 
wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered 
adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a 
government constructed recreational area with facilities to 
include a picnic area and small boat landing range. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, confined disposal facility 
monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports 
were performed by Government forces and contract at a 
cost of $42,015. Engineering and design for major repair 
of the East Breakwater, Lower Entry, continued at a cost 
of $18,525. Replacement of wood fenders at the Upper 
Entry Breakwater and Off Shore Breakwater repairs were 
performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a 
cost of $351,494. Repairs to the Lower Entry Breakwater 
performed by hired labor cost $147,508. Installation of a 
beacon for a differential global positioning system was 
perform by hired labor at a cost of $36,408. Safety 
maintenance performed by hired labor cost $630. An 
adjustment of $12,553 was made in contract cost for 
maintenance dredging completed last FY. Engineering, 
design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost 
$42,434. 
Active portion of the project is complete. Breakwaters 
are in generally good condition except for a weakness 
occurring in about 300 feet of substructure of breakwater 
at the lower entrance. The flared revetment at the upper 
entry should be modified to restrict wave action from the 
21-18

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
stilling basin entrance. Total cost of the existing project 
to end of FY was $33,335,385, of which $5,974,141 was 
for new work, and $27,361,244 for maintenance. 
33. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI 
Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior on the 
eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula, 41 miles 
northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. 
Lac La Belle, Bete Grise Bay, and Mendota Ship Canal 
combine to form the harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14964.) 
Existing project. Provides for construction of two 
parallel piers at the entrance having lengths of 484 and 
682 feet for north and south piers, respectively; for an 
entrance channel between the piers to feet wide and 12 
feet deep, about 820 feet long with a flared approach; and 
for an inner canal 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep, about 
730 feet long. For additional details see page 1039, 
Annual Report for 1964. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Several small, privately owned 
wharves are available in the harbor for use of small craft 
engaged in fishing and recreational activities. A State 
owried dock for small craft is located at the northwest 
corner of Lac La Belle Bay. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $23,295. Emergency 
repairs to secure steel sheet piling on the south side of the 
Breakwater were perform by hired labor at a cost of 
$18,660. An adjustment of -$2,474 was made in contract 
cost for maintenance dredging completed last FY. 
Surveys and supervision and administration cost $4,492. 
The existing project was completed in 1960. 
Controlling depths are about 11 feet in the approach 
channel and 10 feet in the inner channel. Total cost of the 
existing project to end of FY was $969,729, of which 
$269,270 was for new work and $700,459 for 
maintenance. The new work does not include $38,190 
contributed funds. 
34. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS IN 
Location. Lake St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes 
connecting channels, is an expansive shallow basin having 
a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. 
Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14850.) 
Previous project. For details see page 2882, Annual 
Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; 
and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project. An improved channel through Lake 
St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 
miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend 
cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head of 
Detroit River Channel. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. None. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined 
disposal facility monitoring, support of water control 
center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were 
performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of 
$107,875. Maintenance of the disposal area performed by 
hired labor cost $29,870. Audit support to analyze claim 
for maintenance dredging cost $1,532. Engineering and 
design for maintenance dredging to be performed in future 
years cost $22,804. Real estate and supervision and 
administration cost $15,038. 
Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$21,310,914, of which $7,675,357 was for new work 
($6,666,762 regular funds and $1,008,595 Public Works 
Funds) and $13,635,557 for maintenance. 
35. LELAND HARBOR, MI 
Location. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of Lake 
Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles north of 
Frankfort, MI, and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, MI. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912.) 
Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge 
consisting of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a 
protected anchorage and maneuver area about 3 acres in 
extent and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach 
channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south 
pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to 
21-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet 
wide extending to mouth of Carp River, and for 
elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves on each 
side of river below the dam which is 400 feet above the 
river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing 
interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are 
operated by the State and local agencies. All available 
dockage space is utilized. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and �miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces at a cost of $10,611. Repairs to the Outer 
Breakwater, Sections I & II, were performed using the 
U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $96,230. 
Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $5,875. 
A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance 
dredging, removing 13,803 cubic yards of shoal material 
at a cost of $67,311. Engineering, design, surveys, and 
supervision and administration cost $56,024. 
The existing project was completed in 1932 except for 
the 1962 authorization which was completed in 1967. 
Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$3,886,277, of which $1,027,089 was for new work 
(includes $354,139 contributed funds), $2,788,510 for 
maintenance and $70,678 for rehabilitation. 
36. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI 
Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles 
north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14862.) 
Existing project. Provides for two offshore 
breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 
2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on 
the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of 
about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared approach channel 
10 feet deep, decreasing to 160 feet in width through the 
breakwaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing 
facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost of new work is 
$1,647,306 excluding $1,088,888 to be contributed by 
local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation 
were furnished by the Michigan Department of Natural 
Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash 
contribution was $1,088,888. 
Terminal facilities. An existing public fishing pier of 
open pile construction is not adequate for existing and 
prospective commerce. Complete boating facilities are 
planned by State and local agencies in connection with the 
harbor construction. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys, environmental studies, and 
miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by 
Government forces and contract at a cost of $20,273. 
Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 
was performed at a cost of $62,043. Miscellaneous 
inspections and reports cost $564. Engineering, design, 
and supervision and administration for close-out of beach 
nourishment (trucking), completed last FY, under Section 
111 cost $6,432. 
The existing project was completed during FY 1977. 
Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$5,545,710, of which $3,107,192 (includes $1,088,888 
contributed funds) was for new work and $2,438,518 for 
maintenance. 
37. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI 
Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles 
west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand 
Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) 
Existing project. Provides for a small-craft harbor of 
refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep from 
Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by 
breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
ALocal cooperation. Fully compkied with. 
Terminal facilities. Only terminal facility at project 
consists of a public dock built by the State of Michigan for 
light-draft craft. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces at a cost of $26,429. An 
adjustment of $1,385 was made in contract cost for 
21-20

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
maintenance dredging completed last FY. A contract for 
maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this 
FY, removing approximately 8,097 cubic yards of shoal 
material at a cost of $56,315. Engineering, design, 
surveys, and supervision and administration cost $37,389. 
This project is considered complete; however, because 
of shifting sand, the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with 
the result that full project depth is not usually available. 
Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$4,828,774, of which $600,478 was for new work 
(includes $57,670 contributed funds) and $4,228,296 for 
maintenance. 
38. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI 
Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 156 miles 
northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 67 miles northerly 
from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14937.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1951 of Annual 
Report for 1915, page 1491 of Annual Report for 1938, 
and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. 
Existing project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake 
Michigan protected by north and south breakwaters, north 
breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 
feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an 
angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 
2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin 
to 18 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,500 feet; for 
a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake 
Michigan decreasing to 27 feet at the west end of the 
north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a 
channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 
230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette Lake; 
and for inner piers and revetments, 1,649 feet long on 
north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere 
Marquette Lake. The estimated (1977) Federal cost for 
new work is $8,250,000. Estimated total cost for local 
interests is $147,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. In addition to main terminal of 
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company consisting of three 
car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several 
wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous 
commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces at a cost of $101,010. The FY93 repair contract 
for the North Breakwater, Section A, was completed this 
FY at a cost of $358,470. The FY94 repair contract for 
the South Connector and Breakwater, Sections D & E, 
was also completed this FY at a cost of $679,315. 
Engineering and design during construction of the North 
& South Breakwater and Connector cost $18,480. Safety 
maintenance performed by hired labor cost $11,712. A 
contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and 
completed this FY, removing 29,085 cubic yards of shoal 
material at a cost of $179,569. Engineering, design, 
surveys, and supervision and administration cost 
$150,932. 
Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional 
details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of 
Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures range 
from fair to good condition and are programmed for 
repairs. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY 
was $26,332,028, of which $8,532,202 was for new 
work, $17,441,913 for maintenance, and $357,913 for 
rehabilitation. The maintenance cost does not include 
$136,286 contributed funds. 
39. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI 
Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 179 miles 
northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 26 miles northerly 
from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1952 of Annual 
Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existing project. An entrance channel in Lake 
Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revetment; 
a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; and 
Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street 
Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 
23 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 
1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Installations are on both sides of 
river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes 
coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is 
21-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
a Government wharf and a State and City owned 
recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These 
facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces and contract at a cost of $101,267. 
Engineering and design for repairs to the South Connector 
and South Pier were completed at a cost of $68,765. A 
contract was awarded for this work in the amount of 
$1,393,300. The contract was 90% complete at the end 
of the FY at a cost of $1,250,063. Engineering and 
design during construction for this work cost $12,383. 
Structure repairs performed by hired labor cost $31,288. 
Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $9,021. 
Supervision and administration cost $117,529. 
Existing project was completed in August 1967. For 
additional details on completion of existing project see 
page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation 
structures range from generally poor to good condition. 
Total cost for existing project to end of FY was 
$15,003,359, of which $2,696,522 was for new work, 
$10,932,673 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for 
rehabilitation. 
40. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI 
Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 
miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 106 miles from 
Green Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) 
Previous projects. See page 1379 of Annual Report for 
1962. 
Existing project. The total estimated (Oct. 1981) 
project cost is $3,080,000; the Federal cost is $1,085,000 
and non-Federal cost is $1,995,000, which is a cash 
contribution. See Chicago District Annual Report for 
1979, Table 30-C. 
For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report 
for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 
modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non-Federal 
which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on 
the 1968 modification was postponed until 1982. The 
portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was 
deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 
1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21- 
B for authorizing legislation.) 
Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing 
harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 
1979, and 720-foot channel extension affirmed in July 
1982, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and 
Harbor Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must 
make an annual cash contribution equivalent to 50% of the 
annual costs associated with construction and maintenance 
of the channel extension until such time that a second user 
utilizes the channel extension. Such a contribution is 
presently estimated at $9,206; additional assurances 
require that the sponsor provide without cost to the United 
States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for 
construction and subsequent maintenance, including 
suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be 
required in the general public interest for initial and 
subsequent disposal of dredged materials, and the 
necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments 
therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and 
save the United States free from damages due to the 
construction works and subsequent use, operation, and 
maintenance of the project, not including damages due to 
the fault or negligence of the United States or its 
contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the 
United States adequate berthing areas at the docks adjacent 
to the improvement; accomplish at no cost to the United 
States all relocations and alterations of utilities necessary 
for the project; assume full responsibility for all project 
first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of 
$2,000,000; and comply with the Uniform Relocation 
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 
1970. 
Terminal facilities. Three car-ferry slips, a grain 
elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves 
used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and 
miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are 
considered adequate for existing commerce, it is believed 
the city should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse 
and railway connection open to the general public. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces at a cost of $149,259. An 
adjustment of $17,446 was made in contract cost for 
repairs to South Breakwater, Section B, completed last 
FY. Engineering and design for this work cost $2,525. 
Extension Channel and South Breakwater, Section B, 
21-22

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
obstruction and stone removal, was performed using the 
U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $161,268. 
Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost 
$14,505. Confined disposal facility maintenance 
performed by hired labor and contract cost $1,131. A 
contract was awarded and completed for maintenance 
dredging, removing approximately 44,726 cubic yards of 
shoal material at a cost of $357,581. Engineering, design, 
real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration 
cost $89,656. Of the funds expended, $25,888 was 
contributed by The City of Manitowoc. 
Existing project is complete except for the 1962 and 
1968 modifications. The 1962 modification was 
deauthorized December 31, 1990. Work on the 1968 
modification was essentially completed in FY 83. The 
Federal modification, adopted July 15, 1985, included the 
expansion of the new entrance channel to the Section 107 
project and extension of the rubblemound breakwater. 
Dredging a channel through the outer basin to existing 
project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub 
pier at the river entrance were completed in December 
1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 
1942. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$15,353,825, of which $3,960,044 was for new work 
(includes $1,911,130 contributed funds) and $11,367,894 
for maintenance (includes $47,460 contributed funds). 
41. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI 
Location. In Marquette Bay on south shore of Lake 
Superior, 160 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 265 
miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14970.) 
Existing project. Provides for a breakwater, and a 
harbor basin 26.5 feet deep, giving a protected area of 350 
acres. Project was modified in 1960 to provide a 27-foot 
depth in harbor area. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required for earlier 
authorizations. Fully complied with for the 1960 Act. 
Terminal facilities. One ore dock, unused at present; 
two coal docks; one petroleum dock; and three other 
unused docks. There are also several small fish wharves 
without railroad connections. Facilities are considered 
adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $37,186. Repairs to the 
West Breakwater were performed using the Derrickbarge 
COLEMAN at a cost of $227,595. Real estate and 
supervision and administration cost $5,714 
Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$4,645,542, of which $1,282,893 was for new work, 
$2,896,892 for maintenance and $465,757 for 
rehabilitation. 
42. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, 
MI AND WI 
Location. On Lake Michigan at the mouth of 
Menominee River on the western shore of Green Bay, 16 
miles northwest of the mouth of Sturgeon Bay, and 49 
miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, about 155 miles 
from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. The river 
forms the boundary between the commercial harbors at 
Marinette, WI, and Menominee, MI. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14917.) 
Previous projects. See page 1361 of Annual Report for 
1962. 
Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 
for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. 
For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report 
for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and 
Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000 
Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. Costs of completed 
new work, exclusive of inactive work and amount 
expended on previous projects, are $221,053 Federal and 
$40,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution 
of $36,762. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. 
Terminal facilities. These are 9 wharves for handling 
coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous commodities. 
City of Marinette, WI, provided a public wharf. Facilities 
are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, 
except that there is need for a public wharf owned by city 
of Menominee, with warehouse and railway connection. 
21-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces and contract at a cost of $40,097. 
An adjustment of -$146 was made in cost for safety 
maintenance performed last FY. 
The project in effect prior to the modification of March 
2, 1945, was completed in 1938. No additional work was 
necessary under the modification of March 2, 1945, to 
provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension of the channel 
to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club, as project 
depth or more was available. The entrance piers were 
completed in 1884, were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are 
in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the 
Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the 
turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in 
May 1938. Modification of the project authorized by the 
1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive. Construction for 
the 1967 modifications was started August 17, 1968, and 
completed in October 1968. Total cost of the existing 
project to end of FY was $5,256,883, of which $570,238 
was for new work (includes $36,762 contributed funds), 
$3,334,793 for maintenance and $1,351,852 for 
rehabilitation. 
43. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI 
Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 
miles north of Chicago, IL, and about 83 miles. west of 
Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) 
Previous projects. See page 1385 of Annual Report for 
1962. 
Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 
for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed 
description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. 
Completed new work costs are $6,934,804 Federal and 
$478,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on 
previous projects. The uncompleted portion authorized by 
the 1935 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 
1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 
1986 (PL 99-662). Uncompleted portion of 1945 River 
and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21- 
B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Complied with for Acts of March 
2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14, 1960, except 
deauthorized portion of 1945 Act. Act of Aug. 30, 1935, 
provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be 
done by city of Milwaukee and city of Milwaukee be 
reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per 
cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done 
subsequent to authorization of work by Congress. 
Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary 
of War, Feb. 23, 1934, after this work was originally 
authorized as part of public works program. City was 
reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. 
Terminal facilities. There are 4 car-ferry slips, and 57 
other wharves, private and municipal, used for handling 
coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum 
products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in 
inner harbor were inadequate for existing commerce, 
Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constructed nine 
docks in the outer harbor for handling general cargo. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces and contract at a cost of $303,286. 
Development of dredged material management plans 
continued at a cost of $126,366. Engineering and design 
for repair of the South Breakwater, Section E, Riprap was 
initiated at a cost of $74,629. Engineering and design for 
repairs to the North Breakwater, Section D, was 
completed at a cost of $171,707. A contract was awarded 
for this work in the amount of $2,542,000. No work was 
performed this FY. However, the contractor was paid 
$25,000 to cover his cost of bonds. The repair contract 
awarded last FY for Spalling, South Breakwater, Section 
E, began at a cost of $1,639,999. The contract was 49% 
complete at the end of FY. Engineering and design 
during construction for this work cost $71,849. Repairs 
to the North Breakwater, Sections BL1, Cl & C were 
performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at 
a cost of $255,912. Safety maintenance performed by 
hired labor cost $33,490. Confined disposal facility 
maintenance was performed by hired labor and contract at 
a cost of $12,317. A contract was awarded for 
maintenance dredging in the amount of $162,086. 
Dredging will begin next FY. Engineering, design, real 
estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost 
$250,595. 
Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. 
The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. North 
breakwater and shore connection, 9,954 feet long, was 
completed in August 1925. North pier was completed in 
1905 and construction of south pier was completed in 
21-24

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and 
shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before 
modification of August 30, 1935, City of Milwaukee also 
dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of 
inner entrance piers and lakeward of pierhead line to more 
than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United 
States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the 
area of the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to 
provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto 
pier opposite East Claybourn Street. Work on the 1945 
modification was completed in August 1957, except for 
the uncompleted portion which consists of dredging the 
Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to upper limit of the 
project at Humboldt Avenue. The uncompleted portion of 
the project authorized by the 1945 Rivers and Harbors Act 
was deauthorized in 1977. Total cost of the existing 
project to end of FY was $64,451,056, of which 
$8,231,024 was for new work, $43,504,472 for 
maintenance (includes $322,471 contributed funds), and 
$12,715,560 for rehabilitation. 
44. MONROE HARBOR, MI 
Location. On lower reach of River Raisin, which 
empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, 
MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie 
and River Raisin to city of Monroe, for a turning basin, 
and for riprapping protecting dikes at river mouth. 
Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 18 feet in 
turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end of project. For 
additional details see page 1490 of Annual Report for 
1962. Project feature for riprapping protecting dikes is 
considered inactive. Estimated cost of this feature (1954) 
is $90,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen 
the River Raisin portion of the existing 200-foot 
navigation channel from 21 to 27 feet between existing 
turning basin and the river's mouth; deepen the lake 
channel from 21 to 28 feet, and widen the channel from 
200 to 500 feet, for a distance of approximately 47,000 
feet from the river's mouth to the Maumee Bay Entrance 
Channel; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, with a 
diameter of at least 1,600 feet, at the river's mouth; and 
construct a 190 acre confined disposal area in Plum Creek 
Bay behind which would enable the creation of a 700 acre 
marsh. Estimated total cost (Oct. 88) is $150,200,000; 
$59,000,000 Federal and $91,200,000 non-Federal, which 
includes a cash contribution of $19,650,000. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly 
authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are 
as described in the Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Document 22, 71st Congress, 1st Session; R & H Comm. 
Doc. 12, 72d Congress, 1st Session, and 45, 75th 
Congress, 1st Session, and also includes, as a result of PL 
99-662, construction cost sharing as follows: 
a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of 
construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of 
aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at 
$19,650,000. The estimated cash contribution of 
$19,650,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of 
construction, or in annual installments during the 
construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed 
or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by 
the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement 
satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final 
apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have 
been determined; 
b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years 
following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost 
of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount 
presently estimated at $7,860,000. The Secretary of the 
Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent 
repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, 
easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material 
disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs 
to count against the cash payment during construction, and 
in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of 
project cost; and 
c. The confined dike area construction is a non-Federal 
responsibility and is estimated to cost $70,156,000. 
Terminal facilities. Several privately owned docks and 
a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a 
steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin 
for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, environmental studies, 
confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $68,531. Maintenance of 
the confined disposal facility was performed by hired labor 
at a cost of $2,018. Engineering and design for 
21-25

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
maintenance dredging cost $6,875. Dredging will begin 
next FY. Supervision and administration cost $10,787. 
Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$59,204,073, of which $987,340 was for new work 
(includes $300,000 contributed by the Port Commission of 
Monroe) and $58,175,066 for maintenance (includes 
$166,667 contributed funds: $125,000 by Consolidated 
Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company). 
45. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI 
Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles 
northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 80 miles easterly 
from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical chart 19434.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1950 of Annual 
Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and 
page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project. A breakwater protected outer basin in 
Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake 
Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and 
revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the 
lakeward portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the 
channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For 
additional details see page 1303 of Annual Report for 
1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves 
primarily for commercial use. Details on actual port and 
harbor facilities are in Port Series, No. 48 (revised 1981) 
prepared and published by the Water Resources Support 
Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces at a cost of $103,406. Engineering 
and design for repairs to the North Breakwater, Sections 
A and B, was completed at a cost of $61,334. A contract 
for this work was awarded and completed this FY in the 
amount of $281,645. Safety maintenance performed by 
hired labor cost $21,529. Engineering and design for 
maintenance dredging cost $28,332. Dredging will begin 
next FY. Real estate, surveys, and supervision and 
administration cost $21,922. Monitoring in connection 
with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost 
of $85,729. Miscellaneous inspections and reports cost 
$2,977. The contract awarded last FY for beach 
nourishment (trucking) was completed this FY at a cost of 
$240,251. Engineering, design, and supervision and 
administration under Section 111 cost $3,310. 
Existing project, including latest project modification, 
was completed in 1965. For additional details on 
completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual 
Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end 
of FY was $28,872,972, of which $3,017,110 was for 
new work, $12,031,562 for maintenance, and 
$13,824,300 for rehabilitation. 
46. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI 
Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore 
of Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles 
easterly from Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14905.) 
Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 
feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of 
Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 
740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel 
to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet 
long. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. One village owned boat ramp and 
three privately operated marinas, and a private boat club 
facility. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces and contract at a cost of $18,563. 
Engineering and design for repairs to the North and South 
Breakwater, Sections B - E, continued at a cost of 
$20,209. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor 
cost $4,210. Engineering, design, and real estate for 
beach nourishment cost $52,430. A contract for this work 
was awarded in the amount of $277,200. Beach 
nourishment will begin next FY. 
Existing project is complete. Total cost of the existing 
project to end of FY was $7,290,985, of which 
$2,472,183 was for new work (includes $1,186,467 
contributed funds) and $4,818,802 for maintenance. 
21-26

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
47. OCONTO HARBOR, WI 
Location. On the west shore of Green Bay, about 31 
miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and 
about 25 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, 
MI and WI, at mouth of Oconto River. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14910.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1187 of Annual 
Report for 1958. 
Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 
for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed 
description see page 1187, Annual Report for 1958. (See 
Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Two municipally owned wharves 
of 400 and 100 feet frontage, respectively, for 
miscellaneous freight, open to general public use. 
Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and 
reports were performed by Government forces and 
contract at a cost of $29,825. An adjustment of -$4,869 
was made in cost for repairs to the South Pier, Sections D 
and E, performed last FY using the Cranebarge 
MANITOWOC. Safety maintenance was performed by 
hired labor at a cost of $707. Real estate and supervision 
and administration cost $7,872. 
Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$2,317,003, of which $130,754 was for new work and 
$2,186,249 for maintenance. 
48. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI 
Location. About 140 miles east of Duluth, MN, on 
south shore of Lake Superior, at mouth of Ontonagon 
River; provides the only refuge for small craft between the 
Keweenaw Waterway upper entrance and Black River 
Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1931 of Annual 
Report for 1915, and page 1406 of Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existing project. Provides for approach channel 16 feet 
depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenance of 
channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed project 
cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report for 1966 
for details. A modification authorized by 1962 River and 
Harbor Act provides for increasing depths of channels, 
construction of an inner basin and a sedimentation basin. 
(See Table 21-B for authorized legislation.) 
The turning basin feature of the project for navigation at 
Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, MI, authorized by 
the River and Harbor Act of 1962, was deauthorized by 
the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 (Section 1002) Nov. 17, 
1986, 99th Congress, Title X. The channel modification 
project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was 
deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 
1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. There are no publicly owned 
wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving 
facility, and a few small fish wharves. Facilities are 
considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces and contract at a cost of $62,742. 
Repairs to the East and West Piers, Section A, continued 
at a cost of $1,575,488. The contract was approximately 
97% complete at the end of the FY. Engineering and 
design during construction for this work cost $55,779. A 
contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in the 
amount of $258,000. The contract was 91% complete at 
the end of the FY, removing approximately 27,000 cubic 
yards of shoal material at a cost of $233,499. 
Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision 
and administration cost $198,267. 
All work authorized under previous Acts was completed 
in 1938. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY 
was $20,092,797, of which $953,903 was for new work 
and $19,138,894 for maintenance. 
49. PENSAUKEE HARBOR, WI 
Location. On west shore of Green Bay, about 22 miles 
northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, and about 33 miles 
southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. (See 
NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) 
deep, a channel between piers with 17- and 15-foot
21-27

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 
1899, page 2734, and Annual Report for 1938, page 
1429. 
Existing project. An entrance channel 100 feet wide 
and 8 feet deep at low water datum from the depth in 
Green Bay about 4,300 feet to mouth of Pensaukee River. 
Fluctuations of water level are seasonal changes of about 
one-half foot above or below the annual mean stage, and 
extreme fluctuations of a temporary nature, due to wind 
and barometric pressure, of about 2 feet above or below 
mean lake level prevailing at the time. New work for 
completed project cost $24,851, exclusive of amounts 
expended under previous projects. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Small private wharves along lower 
half mile of river, used by the local fishing interests. 
Ample space is available for additional fishing wharves 
when required. Facilities considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys, environmental studies, and 
miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by 
Government forces at a cost of $19,371. 
The existing project was complete in 1938. Total cost 
of the existing project to the end of FY was $705,653 of 
which $34,035 was for new work and $671,618 was for 
maintenance. 
50. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI 
Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 146 miles 
northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 14 miles southerly 
from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) 
Existing project. Provides for widening old entrance 
channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, 
channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, 
with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of 
stone filled timber cribs and piling and capped with 
concrete. The 200-foot extension to south pier portion of 
project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of 
this portion is $65,100. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned 
wharves on west end of Pentwater Lake. The City and 
Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a 
dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. 
Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces at a cost of $14,764. Engineering and design for 
repair of the South Pier and South Revetment, Sections B, 
F-H, J, continued at a cost of $69,826. Safety 
maintenance performed by hired labor cost $7,178. A 
contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and 
completed, removing 15,406 cubic yards of shoal material 
at a cost of $72,921. Engineering, design, surveys, and 
supervision and administration cost $49,492. 
Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 
200-foot extension to the south pier which is not 
considered necessary under present conditions. For 
additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 
1962. Navigation structures are in generally poor 
condition and are scheduled for repair. Total cost of the 
existing project to end of FY was $5,008,139, of which 
$179,899 was for new work, and $4,828,240 for 
maintenance. 
51. POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR 
(AU GRES RIVER), MI 
Location. At Au Gres River on westerly shore of Lake 
Huron at entrance to Saginaw Bay, about 17 miles 
northeast of mouth of Saginaw River. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14863.) 
Existing project. Provides for construction of a small 
boat harbor having a 12-foot deep, 100-foot wide, 2,800- 
foot long outer entrance channel; a 5,600-foot long, 100- 
foot wide inner entrance channel having a 10-foot depth; 
an 8,270-foot long, 6-foot deep river channel ending just 
downstream from U.S. 23 highway bridge and having a 
width of 60 feet; a 4,000-foot long north breakwater and 
a 3,800-foot long south breakwater. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully compfed with. 
Terminal facilities. Small boat marina facilities are 
under construction by the State of Michigan. 
21-28

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys and environmental studies were 
performed by Government forces at a cost of $12,907. 
Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract 
to be awarded next FY cost $214. 
Existing project was completed in 1974. Total cost of 
the existing project to end of FY was $6,622,146, of 
which $2,642,584 was for new work and $3,979,562 for 
maintenance (includes $9,257 contributed funds). 
52. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI 
Location. On west shore of Lake Huron at extreme 
southeastern limit of Saginaw Bay, and 29 miles south of 
AuSable River (Oscoda). (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14863.) 
Existing project. A harbor of refuge at the mouth of 
Bird Creek, consisting of a harbor basin dredged to a 
depthof 10 feet protected by a breakwater structure, and 
for dredging an entrance channel to the harbor basin to a 
depth of 12 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. 
Condition surveys, environmental 
miscellaneous reports were performed 
forces and contract at a cost of $33,190. 
Maintenance: 
studies, and 
by Government 
Total cost for existing project to end of FY was 
$5,342,266, of which $3,363,334 was for new work 
(includes $172,100 contributed funds) and $1,978,932 for 
maintenance. 
53. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI 
Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles 
north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14862.) 
Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge 
protected by breakwater structures extending to 12-foot 
depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet 
deep; for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep; a 70- 
foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm 
added to the north breakwater; and riprap placed at the 
akeward side of the breakwater addition. (See Table 21- 
B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned dock 
used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a 
municipally owned pier for recreational craft. Facilities 
are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys, environmental studies, and 
miscellaneous reports were performed by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $17,431. Safety repairs 
performed by hired labor cost $13,716. 
The project was completed in 1951 except for latest 
modification which was completed in FY 76. The 
breakwaters are in good condition. Total cost of the 
existing project to end of FY was $5,117,307, of which 
$1,733,071 was for new work (includes $487,108 
contributed funds) and $3,384,236 for maintenance 
(includes $115,000 contributed funds). 
54. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI 
Location. On the west shore of Lake Michigan, about 
53 miles south of Manitowoc and about 29 miles north of 
Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) 
Previous project. For details, see page 1938 of Annual 
Report for 1915, page 1459 of Annual Report for 1938, 
and pagg 30-14 of Chicago District Annual Report for 
1975. 
Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 
for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. 
Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing 
harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 12, 
1975, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and 
Harbor Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There is one coal wharf, a 
petroleum tank farm and several fishing wharves. City 
provided a wharf which is open to public use. Facilities 
are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $22,392. Repairs to the 
21-29

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
North Breakwater, Sections A,B,C and Small Boat Harbor 
Wave Attenuator, continued from last FY using the U.S. 
Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $81,145. Safety 
maintenance performed by hired labor cost $9,613. Real 
estate, and supervision and administration cost $8,917. 
The existing project was completed in 1936. The 1958 
modification was deauthorized in 1977. Total cost of the 
existing project to end of FY was $7,272,552, of which 
$4,206,204 was for new work (includes $1,624,000 
contributed funds) and $3,066,348 for maintenance. 
55. PORT WING HARBOR, WI 
Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 34 miles 
easterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14966.) 
Existing project. Provides for two parallel piers at 
entrance, 835 and 1,017 feet long, respectively, 200 feet 
apart; an entrance channel between piers 150 feet wide 
with 15-foot depth; an irregular-shaped turning basin 15 
feet deep at inner end of piers from which two inner 
channels with 8-foot depth extend. One of these is 60 feet 
wide extending southerly for 340 feet and one 70 feet 
wide extending easterly 1,170 feet. 
Portion of dredging of entrance channel to complete 
project width and depth is considered unnecessary to meet 
present navigation requirements. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are four privately owned 
fishing wharves which are considered adequate for existing 
conditions. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous and inspections and reports were 
performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of 
$31,495. 
Existing project is complete, except channel between 
piers, and has been dredged to only a 100-foot width. 
Widening the channel an additional 50 feet was considered 
unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. 
That work was classified inactive and deauthorized on 
August 5, 1977, under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. 
Land owned by the United States totals 7.80 acres. Total 
cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,221,111, 
of which $63,393 was for new work and $1,157,718 for 
maintenance. 
56. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI 
Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan about 186 
miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and about 37 miles 
northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical 
Chart 14939.) 
Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge with 
an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Portage Lake 
protected by piers and revetments. Project depth is 18 
feet. For additional details see page 1297 of Annual 
Report for 1958. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. There are landing places and 
marinas at inner end of Portage Lake. Facilities are 
considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces at a cost of $15,889. Safety maintenance 
performed by hired labor cost $4,345. An adjustment of 
$2,240 was made in contract cost for maintenance 
dredging completed last FY. Engineering, design, 
surveys, and supervision and administration cost $4,942. 
Existing project was substantially completed in 1912. 
For additional details on completion of existing project see 
page 1298 of Annual Report for 1958. Navigation 
structures are in agenerally poor condition and are 
scheduled for repair. Total cost of the existing project to 
end of FY was $2,531,379 of which $256,129 was for 
new work and $2,275,250 for maintenance. 
57. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI 
Location. On south shore of Lake Superior at 
Marquette, MI. It is an indentation about 1.5 miles long 
and one-half mile wide in shore behind Presque Isle Point. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) 
Existing project. A breakwater off Presque Isle Point 
and dredging harbor to depth of 28 feet at inner portion 
with 30 feet at entrance. For details see page 1021 of 
21-30

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
1965 Annual Report. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. One merchandise and petroleum 
receiving wharf and one ore dock. Facilities are 
considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $26,705. An adjustment 
of -$7,976 was made in contract cost for repair of 
Breakwater, Section B, completed in FY93. Supervision 
and administration cost $9,929. 
Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$3,099,436, of which $1,252,192 was for new work, 
$1,770,743 for maintenance and $76,500 for 
rehabilitation. 
58.. ROUGE RIVER, MI 
Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, 
MI, 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne 
County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of city of 
Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1530 of Annual 
Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existing project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from 
Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to 
upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. 
Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation channel, 21 
feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of 
project. (b) Old Channel from Detroit River extending to 
junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project 
depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details 
see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work 
authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was 
reclassified from the active to inactive category. 
Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except 
for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from 
mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in Act of Aug. 
30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of 
inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by Act of 
July 3, 1958, is considered inactive. Estimated cost 
(1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Act of Oct. 23, 1962, requires 
local interests to provide lands and rights-of-way for 
construction upon request of the Chief of Engineers; hold 
the United States free from damages; provide terminal 
facilities to accommodate prospective commerce 
considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and 
maintain areas between the Federal improvement and 
terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved 
Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and 
other structures, and take such other measures as may be 
necessary to assture stability of banks adjacent to channel; 
and provide bridge protection. The assurances of local 
cooperation for the River and Harbor Act of 1962 were 
furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Commission 
and accepted on Jan. 7, 1965. Fulfillment of all items of 
local cooperation has not been accomplished. 
Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks 
for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port 
and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 
45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water 
Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered 
adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys, confined disposal facility monitoring, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces and contract at a cost of $107,991. 
Engineering and design for expansion of the confined 
disposal facility, cell #3, continued at a cost of $30,557. 
An adjustment of -$4,360 was made in contract cost for 
the FY93 maintenance dredging completed last FY. A 
contract for maintenance dredging was awarded this FY in 
the amount of $302,000. The contract was 82% complete 
at the end of FY, removing approximately 33,592 cubic 
yards of shoal material at a cost of $249,959. 
Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and 
administration cost $52,388. 
Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete 
or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of 
existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total cost 
of the existing project to end of FY was $37,244,076, of 
which $675,251 was for new work ($29,563 was 
expended from Emergency Relief Act Funds) and 
$36,568,825 for maintenance. 
21-31

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
59. SAGINAW RIVER, M[I 
Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and 
Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into 
extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities 
of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14867.) 
Previous project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual 
Report for 1915; and page 1550 of Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 
feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27-foot contour in 
Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet 
deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad 
Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide 
to C&O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 16.5 feet 
deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Point. 
Project also provides for five turning basins; one 25 feet 
deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a maximum length 
of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel 
about 1 mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 
feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one 20 feet deep at 
Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and 900 feet long; one 20 
feet deep downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 
feet wide and 1,000 feet long; and one 15 feet deep 
between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central 
Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks 
for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual 
port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 45 
(revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water 
Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered 
adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined 
disposal facility monitoring, support of water control 
center and miscellaneous inspections and reports were 
performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of 
$469,959. Development of dredged material management 
plans continued at a cost of $172,987. The contract 
awarded last FY for maintenance dredging of the Bay and 
River Section was completed this FY, removing 9,433 
cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $28,772. A 
contract for maintenance dredging of the Bay and River 
was awarded this FY in the amount of $1,379,000. The 
contract was 87% complete at the end of FY, removing 
203,179 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of 
$1,197,430. Engiieering, design, real estate, surveys, 
and supervision and administration cost $158,476. 
Engineering, design, and real estate for construction of a 
diked disposal area for Upper Saginaw continued at a cost 
of $187,106. 
Existing project is complete except for small part of the 
work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section 
D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is 
complete except for the channel portion, which is pending 
modification. Total cost of the existing project to end of 
FY was $87,796,005, of which $14,930,727 was for new 
work and $72,865,278 for maintenance. 
60. ST. CLAIR RIVER, Ml 
Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes 
connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake 
Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14852.) 
Existing project. Provides for channels through St. 
Clair River, which, at low water datum, are suitable for 
vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for 
improvement of North Channel outlet, 100 feet wide and 
10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths are 
referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. 
Clair; 577.5 and 572.3 feet above mean water level at 
Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. (See Tables 21-B and 
21-H for dahithorizing legislation and features of existing 
project.) Act of July 24, 1946, provides for widening and 
deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet of 
north channel at an estimated cost (1986) of $870,000; 
$435,000 Federal and $435,000 non-Federal. On June 
16, 1969, the Director of Civil Works approved 
substitution of the middle channel of the St. Clair River 
for the authorized north channel. Subsequently, however, 
the work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 
24, 1946, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 
99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through 
commerce, between the upper and lower Great Lakes, and 
has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its 
route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves 
are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, 
21-32

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
MI, which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, 
wood-pulp, salt and general cargo. These installations 
satisfy present commerce requirements. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined 
disposal facility monitoring, support of water control 
center and miscellaneous inspections and reports were 
performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of 
$147,589. Location and removal of obstructions were 
performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge HURON at a cost 
of $406,137. Audit support to analyze claim for 
maintenance dredging cost $1,532. Maintenance of the 
disposal area cost $7,571. Engineering and design for 
maintenance dredging to be performed in future years cost 
$36,839. Real estate and supervision and administration 
cost $18,939. 
Existing project is complete. Total cost of the existing 
project to end of FY was $43,743,352, of which 
$19,213,246 was for new work and $24,530,106 for 
maintenance. 
61. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI 
Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 60 miles 
easterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles southerly from 
South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14930.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1945 of Annual 
Report for 1915, and page 1470 of Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existing project. Provides for protecting mouth of St. 
Joseph River by two piers, 250 to 325 feet apart at their 
inner and outer ends, respectively, having lengths of 2,758 
feetuon north side and 2,603 feet on south side; for a 
channel 21 feet deep from Lake Michigan to mouth of 
Benton Harbor Canal, a length of about 6,900 feet with 
widths of 265 feet at outer end of piers, 190 feet at inner 
end of piers and revetments, thence generally 215 feet to 
lower end of turning basin, increasing to 250 feet above 
the turning basin to mouth of Paw Paw River, thence 
generally 110 feet in Paw Paw River to mouth of Benton 
Harbor Canal; for dredging channel in Benton Harbor 
Canal up to west line of Riverview Drive extended 
northerly, to 18 feet deep and 80 feet wide; and a turning 
basin 18 feet deep on north side of channel above mouth 
of Morrison Channel and a turning basin 18 feet deep near 
mouth of Paw Paw River. Public Law 88-88 declared a 
portion of Benton Harbor Canal a non-navigable stream. 
(See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Several commercial wharves for 
handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and 
miscellaneous commodities. A package freight terminal 
and a public docking facility is also available. Facilities 
considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces at a cost of $84,415. Repairs to the North and 
South Breakwater, Sections A-C, were performed using 
the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of 
$125,600. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor 
cost $30,423. A contract for maintenance dredging the 
outer channel ovas awarded and completed this FY, 
removing 33,335 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of 
$132,417. This contract was also for beach nourishment. 
Maintenance of the disposal area performed by hired labor 
cost $225. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision 
and administration cost $65,251. Environmental activities 
for a disposal area and polluted dredged material 
continued at a cost of $93,560. Monitoring in connection 
with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 cost $39,800. 
Miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $2,137. Beach 
nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance 
dredging outer channel contract awarded and completed 
this FY cost $52,591. A contract was awarded for beach 
nourishment (trucking) in the amount of $308,080. 
Mobilization for beach nourishment began this FY at a 
cost of $3,999. Another contract was awarded for stone 
placement in the amount of $974;000. The contract was 
73% complete at the end of FY at a cost of $706,998. 
Engineering, design, and supervision and administration 
cost $215,400 under Section 111. 
Existing project was completed in 1956. The structures 
are in generally good condition. For additional details on 
completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual 
Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end 
of FY was $26972,577, of which $1,804,485 was for 
new work, $24,205,876 for maintenance and $962,216 for 
rehabilitation. 
21-33

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
62. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI 
Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 
miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan 
and Providence of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of 
Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See 
NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, and 14884.) At 
Sault Ste. Marie, MI, about 14 miles downstream from 
Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a 
hydroelectric powerplant. 
Previous project. For details see page 1955, Annual 
Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project. Channels permitting 25.5-foot draft 
navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake 
Huron approaches thereto; constructing and operating four 
locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 
14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate 
capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river above and 
below locks; and constructing various other works in 
conjunction with project. Subsequently, in 1932, the Unit 
10 powerhouse was installed raising the capacity to 18,400 
kilowatts (45,000 ultimate capacity). Original State Locks 
were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite 
appropriation from Jun. 9, 1881, to Nov. 2, 1886, after 
which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock 
in 1896. Weitzel Lock, destroyed in 1942 by excavation 
for the MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained 
under the same appropriation from Sep. 1, 1881, to Jun. 
30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and maintained under 
the same appropriation from Aug. 3, 1896, Davis Lock 
from Oct. 21, 1914, and Sabin Lock from Sep. 18, 1919, 
to end of FY 1935. The 1,200-foot by 110-foot new Poe 
Lock was authorized in 1962 and put into operation in 
1968. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 
21-F. 
Project depths are referred to low water datum 
corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: 
Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at 
elevation 601.1 feet and at upstream side of locks is 600.6 
feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 
1985. Below locks: When water surface at downstream 
side of locks is at elevation 578.4 feet and Lake Huron is 
577.5 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, 
IGLD 1985. Estimated (1974) cost for new work is 
$163,087,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
The WRDA of 1986 authorized construction of a second 
lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in 
depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock 
is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls 
Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing 
Davis and Sabin Locks. Material removed during 
construction of the replacement lock will be placed on the 
Northwest Pier to serve as a windbreak for downbound 
vessels approaching the lock. Estimated cost (Oct. 90) is 
$174,200,000 Federal and $93,800,000 non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly 
authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are 
as follows: 
(a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, 
easements, and rights-of-way necessary for implementation 
and later maintenance of the proposed project, and for aids 
to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, 
including suitable areas determined by the Chief of 
Engineers to be required in the general public interest for 
initial and later disposal of dredged/demolition material 
and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and 
embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining 
works; 
(b) Hold and save the United States free from damages 
due to the implementation and maintenance of the project, 
not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the 
United States or its contractors; 
(c) Accomplish witimut cost to the United States such 
alterations and relocations of pipelines, powerlines, cables, 
sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utilities, 
structures, and improvements made necessary by the 
project. (Any such costs of the items on Federal property 
at the locks, would be part of the total construction cost 
and not separable local sponsor cost.); 
(d) Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of 
construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of 
aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at 
$67,000,000. The estimated cash contribution of 
$67,000,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of 
construction, or in annual installments during the 
construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed 
or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by 
the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement 
satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final 
21-34

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have 
been determined; 
(e) Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years 
following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost 
of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount 
presently estimated at $26,800,000. The Secretary of the 
Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent 
repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, 
easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material 
disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs 
to count against the cash payment during construction, and 
in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of 
project cost; and 
(f) Any construction needed to prevent/mitigate for 
erosion or shoaling attributed to the lock would be cost 
shared in the same proportion as the project. 
Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through 
commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has 
not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities 
along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive 
coal and petroleum products. Limestone is shipped from 
a pier at Drummond Island. Vessel refueling stations are 
at Lime Island and village of DeTour; they receive coal 
and petroleum products. Present terminals satisfy current 
traffic requirements. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operations, 
maintenance, and care of locks: Two canals and three 
locks were operated (the fourth lock, Sabin, was out of 
service) as required. Necessary repairs and improvements 
were made thereto and to appurtenant structures and 
equipment. Canals were open to navigation 297 days 
during the period 1 October 1994 through 30 September 
1995. A total of 11,342 vessels, aggregating 88,783,913 
short tons of freight and 241,138 passengers passed 
through the MacArthur, Poe and Davis Locks. Total cost 
for operation, maintenance, and care of the locks during 
the FY was $8,532,387, which includes $6,382 to 
construct a building to house the generator; $42,327 for a 
stability analysis update of the MacArthur Lock; a contract 
awarded this FY to automate the Poe Lock operations 
(Phase I) in the amount of $227,000; $58,028 for 
preparation of plans and specifications for repair of the 
Sabin Lock dewatering gates; a contract awarded and 
completed for this work in the amount of $677,777 with 
supervision and administration at a cost of $34,813; 
$359,460 for extended season operation and maintenance, 
and $86,098 for operation and maintenance of the 
Gatelifter PAUL BUNYAN. 
Powerhouse and equipment: A total of 126,824,900 
kilowatt-hours of power was generated this FY. Income 
from the sale of power, sent to the U.S. Treasury, 
amounted to $1,431,365. Total cost of operation and 
maintenance for two hydroelectric powerhouses during the 
FY was $2,544,449, which includes a deduction of 
$72,922 for interdepartmental electricity sold but not paid 
for. Total cost also includes assistance from the 
Hydroelectric Design Center for continued benchmark 
testing of the generators and turbines, a powerhouse 
rehabilitation report, preparation of plans and 
specifications for generator rewind of Units 1,2,3, 3A 
runner, and Unit #10 shaft runner all at a cost of 
$288,214; FY 93 contract for generator rewind of Units 
1 thru 3 at a cost of $941,100 (75% complete) with 
supervision and administration of the contract at a cost of 
$59,907; contract awarded last FY for rehabilitation of 
hydroelectric Unit 3A cost $350,000 (21% complete) with 
supervision and administration of the contract at a cost of 
$23,597. Of the funds expended, $169,999 was 
contributed by the Edison Sault Electric Company. 
Other operation and care items: Buildings and grounds 
were operated and maintained, condition surveys, 
operations studies, environmental activities, real estate, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
at a cost of $2,114,348, which includes a custodial, snow 
removal and grounds upkeep contract for $317,371 and a 
service contract for security measures for $453,274. 
Supervision and administration to close the contract 
completed last FY for rewiring and relighting the 
administration building cost $45,425. A contract was 
awarded this FY in the amount of $147,000 for elevator 
upgrade in the administration building. No work was 
performed this FY. However, contractor was paid 
$25,999 to cover his cost of bonds. Engineering, design, 
supervision and administration cost $48,774. Winter and 
extended navigation season studies, ice measurements, and 
weather monitoring cost $146,603. 
Channels and canals: St. Marys River channels and 
canal approach depths were surveyed by sweeping. 
Removal of shoals in the St. Marys River channels and 
canal approaches was performed by hired labor using the 
U.S. Derrickbarge NICOLET and the U.S. Cranebarge 
HARVEY at a cost of $2,124,878. Work performed by 
hired labor on the Compensating Gates cost $16,660. 
Supervision and administration cost $151,547. An 
21-35

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
adjustment of -$106,216 was made in contract cost for 
maintenance dredging of courses 5, 6 and 8 of the West 
Neebish Channel completed last FY. Engineering, design, 
and supervision and administration to close-out the 
contract cost $20,159. 
Other miscellaneous items: An adjustment in the 
amount of $24,066 was made in contract cost for FY93 
switch gear assembly "A" replacement completed last FY. 
Supervision and administration to close the contract cost 
$9,188. The contract awarded last FY for repair of the 
Southwest Pier and West Center Pier Hole was completed 
this FY in the amount of $294,415. Engineering, design, 
and supervision and administration to close the contract 
cost $29,345. A contract was awarded this FY for 
emergency replacement of the steam plant in the amount 
of $1,329,696. The contract was 47% complete at the 
end of the FY at a cost of $626,000. Engineering, 
design, and supervision and administration cost $221,761. 
Another contract was awarded this FY for repair of Unit 
#10 closure south dike in the amount of $2,185,250. The 
contract was 64% complete at the end of the FY at a cost 
of $1,399,999. Engineering, design, and supervision and 
administration cost $135,514. Engineering and design for 
the master plans of the facility were performed by hired 
labor and contract at a cost of $4,280. Review of plans 
and specifications, and supervision and administration in 
support of Edison Soo construction contract for repair of 
compensating works cost $101,286. Plans and 
specifi4ations for various repair contracts to be awarded 
next FY cost $73,907. 
Recreational facilities: Information center, visitors 
center, comfort stations, park fountain, and observation 
and overlook platforms were operated and maintained at 
a cost of $209,864 which includes a custodial contract for 
the Information Center at a cost of $27,112. The contract 
awarded last FY for the expansion and renovation of the 
visitors center was completed this FY at a cost of 
$600,299. Engineering, design, and supervision and 
administration of the contract cost $157,056. Visitors 
entering the Soo Locks Visitors Center numbered 
509,809. Visitors to the observation platforms 
overlooking the locks numbered 552,710. Total visitors 
to the Soo Locks park numbered 751,685. A grand total 
of 852,112 people (includes tour boat visitors of 191,476) 
visitedethe Soo Locks. 
Total project costs in FY 95 amounted to $19,551,993. 
Project in effect prior to modification of March 21, 
1956, is complete and work authorized by 1956 
modification to provide a safe draft of 25.5 feet for both 
upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. Public 
Works Acceleration Funds used for maintenance were 
$118,000. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY 
was $459,055,757, of which $160,657,071 was for new 
work and $298,398,686 for maintenance. 
63. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND 
KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI 
Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 
90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 22 miles 
northerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical 
Chart 14906.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual 
Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existing project. Entrance channel protected by parallel 
piers at mouth of Kalamazoo River and a river channel to 
village of Saugatuck, MI. Project depths: 16 feet in 
entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional 
details on page 1456 of 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 
21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. At village of Saugatuck, MI, there 
are several landing places for recreational craft and one 
for small commercial vessels. At village of Douglas, MI, 
there is a landing pier. Facilities are considered adequate 
for present traffic. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces at a cost of $41,522. Safety repairs performed by 
hired labor cost $8,336. Engineering and design was 
initiated for repair of the North and South Pier, Sections 
A - G, at a cost of $90,454. Supervision and 
administration cost $2,808. 
Existing project was completed in 1903. Navigation 
structures are in generally poor condition and are 
scheduled for repair. Total cost of the existing project to 
end of FY was $4,237,036, of which $364,527 was for 
new work and $3,872,509 for maintenance. 
21-36

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
64. SAXON HARBOR, WI 
Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior in 
Wisconsin at the mouth of Oronto Creek, 27 miles 
southeast of the harbor at Bayfield, WI, and 21 miles 
westerly of the harbor at Black River, MI; 99 miles east 
of Duluth-Superior Harbor and 60 miles west of 
Ontonagon Harbor, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
14965.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1254 of Annual 
Report for 1962. 
Existing project. Provides for east and west 
breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin 
and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto 
Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel 
excavation and a levee. For detailed dimensions of 
features see pate 1025 of Annual Report for 1965. (See 
Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. One wharf 300 feet long on the 
east side of present harbor basin constructed by local 
interests. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces and contract at a cost of $15,573. 
Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract 
to be awarded next FY cost $5,665. 
The project was completed in March 1968. A 
reconnaissance report was completed in August 1971 
concerning erosion of the shoreline west of the harbor. 
Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$1,554,015, of which $711,777 was for new work and 
$842,238 for maintenance. The new work cost does not 
include $50,193 contributed funds. 
65. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI 
Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 
miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of 
Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) 
Previous project. See page 1381.of Annual Report for 
1962. 
Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 
for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. 
For detailed description see page 1230 of Annual Report 
for 1963. New work for project as completed cost 
$648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous 
projects. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, 
petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City 
provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate 
for existing commerce. 
0 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces at a cost of $45,137. Engineering 
and design for repair of the North Pier, Sections A & B, 
was completed at a cost of $42,462. A contract for this 
work was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of 
$204,563. Engineering and design during construction 
cost $7,451. Repairs to the South Pier, Sections 
N,M,L,K,J&I, North Breakwater, Sections D&E, were 
performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at 
a cost of $44,251. Safety repairs performed by hired 
labor cost $15,241. Real estate, and supervision and 
administration cost $38,294. 
Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction 
of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 and 
completed in October 1915. Dredging entrance channel 
to existing project depth was commenced in June and 
completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was 
completed in December 1956. Navigation structures range 
from fair to good condition. Inner 260 feet of south pier 
was replaced with a revetment by private interests under 
permit granted July 16, 1931, by the Secretary of War. 
Piers, therefore, are maintained only for a length of about 
2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is navigable about 2.4 miles 
above its mouth for craft drawing not more than 2 feet. 
Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$10,539,122, of which $1,136,088 was for new work, 
$8,794,006 for maintenance and $609,028 for 
rehabilitation. 
66. SILVER BAY HARBOR, MN 
Location. The city of Silver Bay, MN is situated on the 
north shore of Lake Superior about 50 miles northeast of 
21-37

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
Duluth, MN. The proposed harbor of refuge is located 
between the Northshore Mining taconite processing facility 
and the city's water intake plant. The project site includes 
approximately 21.5 acres and includes over 2,000 feet of 
shoreline. 
Existing Project. The project was authorized under the 
River & Harbor Act 1945, House Document 446-78-2. 
The project is a Harbor of Refuge for small boats 
navigating the north shore of Lake Superior. This harbor 
will be part of a system of small craft harbors of refuge at 
30 to 40 mile intervals between Duluth and Grand Marais, 
Minnesota. The 1994 Appropriations Act for Energy and 
Water Development provided $2.6 Million Federal funds 
for the project: $100,000 for review of the non-Federal 
harbor design and $2.5 Million for the Federal share of 
harbor construction. The State of Minnesota has provided 
the funds for the non-Federal share. The project will 
repair/improve an existing breakwater and construct and 
additional adjacent breakwater. 
Local cooperation. The State of Minnesota is the non- 
Federal sponsor, acting through the Minnesota Department 
of Natural Resources. The state will provide all the 
required documentation and plans and specifications to the 
Detroit District for review, and the district will award and 
manage the construction. The construction contract is 
scheduled for award in FY-96. 
Operations during fiscal year. In FY-95, the Corps 
coordinated the Project Cooperation Agreement, required 
technical documentation and real estate requirements with 
the sponsor. The state finalized the project location 
initiated real estate acquisition from the mining company. 
Total cost to end of FY was $120,311. 
67. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI 
Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77 miles 
northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles northerly 
from St. Joseph, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual 
Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existing project. An entrance channel protected by 
parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a 
river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 
feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and 
turning basin. For additional details see page 1455 of 
Annual Report for 1962. The turning basin feature was 
subsequently deauthorized by Section 116 of the WRDA 
of 1992 (PL 102-580). (See Table 21-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Several wharves for handling coal, 
building materials, wood-pulp, fish, and miscellaneous 
commodities; two have warehouses. Facilities satisfy 
current commerce requirements. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, 
and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed 
by Government forces and contract at a cost of $78,527. 
The contract awarded last FY for repairs to the South Pier 
and Revetment, Sections A, L, N & G was completed this 
FY at a cost of $357,399. Engineering and design during 
construction cost $14,670. Safety maintenance performed 
by hired labor cost $15,935. Supervision and 
administration cost $72,032. Monitoring in connection 
with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost 
of $1,756. The contract for beach nourishment (trucking) 
awarded last FY was completed this FY at a cost of 
$252,001. Engineering, design, and supervision and 
administration under Section 111 cost $23,354. 
Existing project was completed in 1960. Project now 
being maintained to 14-foot and 12-foot depths, 
respectively (in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized), 
which is adequate for current usage. For additional details 
on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual 
Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end 
of FY was $10,201,422, of which $984,426 was for new 
work, $7,584,920 for maintenance and $1,632,076 for 
rehabilitation. 
68. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE 
MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI 
Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 
miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north 
of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) 
Previous project. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 
1962. 
Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 
for 1979, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed 
21-38

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
decitosepg 23 Ana eotfr16.(e 
description, see page 1223, Annual Report for;:1963. (See 
Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. As the canal and connecting 
channel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are 
in city of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of revetted 
portion of canal. These facilities consist of two wharves 
for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous 
commodities, and four shipbuilding yards. City of 
Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf about 5 miles 
northwesterly from city of Sturgeon Bay. Two major 
shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair 
facilities are available including dry docks, marine 
railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces at a cost of $125,405. Engineering and design was 
completed for repair of the South Detached Breakwater, 
Sections D & E and South Revetment, Section N, at a cost 
of $27,791. A contract was awarded and completed for 
this work in the amount of $180,770. Engineering and 
design during construction cost $9,546. Repairs to the 
South Revetment, Section H and North Detached 
Breakwater, Sections D & F, were performed using the 
U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $79,301. 
Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost 
$10,712. A contract was awarded for maintenance 
dredging in the amount of $309,600. The contract was 
99% complete at the end of FY, removing approximately 
56,560 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of 
$307,290. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and 
supervision and administration cost $82,689. 
Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$12,110,795, of which $1,059,722 was for new work, 
$10,166,174 for maintenance and $884,899 for 
rehabilitation. In addition, $235,940 was expended 
between April 25, 1893, and June 30, 1917, on operating 
and care of works of improvements under provision of 
permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 
69. TWO HARBORS, MN 
Location. Harbor is on north shore of Lake Superior, 
27 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart 14966.) 
Existing project. Narrowing natural entrance by 
construction of two breakwaters, 1,628 and 900 feet long, 
from eastern and western points of bay, respectively; and 
dredging a maneuvering area on north side of harbor to 28 
and 30 feet deep. A walkway on east breakwater is 
provided for public recreational use. For details see page 
1026 of Annual Report for 1965. Dredging to deepen 
areas along easterly and northerly edges of channel was 
completed in 1980. This portion of project was 
reclassified from the "inactive" to "active" category in 
1973. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. A section 
221 Local Cooperation Agreement was entered into with 
the city of Two Harbors on Aug. 14, 1978. 
Terminal facilities. No publicly owned wharves. 
Three ore docks, tug wharf, an unused coal dock, and 
merchandise wharf are privately owned. Facilities 
considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $68,319. 
The existing project is complete. Total cost of the 
existing project to end of FY was $9,405,390, of which 
$4,170,710 was for new work and $5,234,680 for 
maintenance. 
70. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI 
Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 
miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from Green 
Bay, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical 
Chart 14903.) 
Previous project. See page 1377, Annual Report for 
1962. 
Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 
for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. 
For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report 
for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463, exclusive of 
the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 
River and Harbor Act portion of project is essentially 
complete, except for dredging a 10-foot width along each 
side of the entrance channel between the piers. The 
uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 
21-39

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
R & H Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in 
accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 
99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing 
wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum 
products and public use. Facilities considered adequate 
for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were performed by Government 
forces a cost of $56,187. Safety maintenance 
performed by hired labor cost $2,635. Engineering and 
design continued for repair of the South Pier and 
Revetment, Sections E and F, at a cost of $109,992. 
Repairs to the North and South Pier, Sections C & D, 
were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge 
MANITOWOC at a cost of $39,460. Real estate, and 
supervision and administration cost $9,946. 
Existing project is complete except for portion 
deauthorized in December 1989. Present width of channel 
is considered adequate for present and reasonably 
prospective commerce. South Pier was completed in 1883 
and is in poor condition. The South Pier and South 
Revetment are scheduled for repairs. North Pier was 
completed in 1908. North Revetment, completed in 1917, 
was rebuilt in May to August 1962. Dredging entrance 
channel and inner basin to existing project depth was 
commenced in March and substantially completed in May 
1937. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$7,936,355, of which $360,320 was for new work, 
$7,517,978 for maintenance, and $58,057 for minor 
rehabilitation. 
71. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI 
Location. On the east shore of Lake Michigan 120 
miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 45 miles 
southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical 
Chart 14935.) 
Existing project. Parallel piers, revetments, and a 
channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, 1,950 feet long, 
extending from Lake Michigan to White Lake. For 
additional details see page 1465 of Annual Report for 
1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. A privately owned chemical 
shipping dock on the north side of the lake about 3 miles 
from the inner end of revetted entrance channel. Across 
the lake, at village of Whitehall, there are several 
installations serving light draft vessels. These terminals 
satisfy present recreational and commercial traffic 
requirements. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were perform by Government 
forces and contract at a cost of $27,306. Engineering and 
design continued for repair of the North & South Pier and 
Revetment, Sections C-H & J, at a cost of $42,264. 
Engineering and design continued for repair of the North 
& South Piers, Sections A-D, at a cost of $43,470. 
Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $9,643. 
A contract for beach nourishment (trucking) under Section 
111 of P.L. 90-483 was awarded in the amount of 
$198,400. Mobilization for beach nourishment began this 
FY at a cost of $3,500. Engineering, design, and surveys 
cost $29,814. 
Existing project was completed in 1908. Stone was 
placed on the north and south revetments in FY 1972. 
The structures are in generally poor condition and are 
scheduled for repairs. Project now being maintained to 
14-foot depth authorized, which is adequate for current 
usage. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was 
$4,242,848, of which $457,562 was for new work and 
$3,785,286 for maintenance. 
72. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION 
SURVEYS 
See Table 21-J. 
73. OTHER AUTHORIZED 
NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
See Table 21-C. 
74. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation activities pursuant to section 107. Public 
Law 86-645 (pre-authorization.) None. 
21-40

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
Beach Erosion Control 
75. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended, Beach 
Erosion Control. None. 
76. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION 
Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline 
protection of public works and non-profit services 
(Section 14 Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended). 
Fair Haven, MI - Due to real estate problems, the 
project was divided into two contracts. The first contract 
provided for construction of a stone revetment to protect 
222 feet of shoreline adjacent to State Highway M-29. 
The project was completed and its facilities turned over to 
the State on April 17, 1992. The second construction 
contract was awarded in July 1994. The second contract 
provides for 571 feet of protection of shoreline westward 
of State Highway M-29. Construction was completed on 
September 19, 1994 and financial close-out was completed 
in June 1995 at a federal cost of $24,959 and an 
adjustment of -$19,721 in non-federal. Total funds 
expended in FY 95 was $5,238. 
Memorial Drive, Muskegon, MI- In FY 95, a funding 
adjustment of -$6,372 was made to financially close the 
project. The project involved providing shoreline erosion 
protection along the eastern shoreline of Lake Michigan 
for approximately 1,050 feet of erosion of Scenic Drive at 
Memorial Drive, Muskegon County, Michigan. 
Oconto River, Oconto, WI - Funds in the amount of 
$47,030 were used in FY 95 to construct approximately 
400 feet of stone streambank protection along the Oconto 
River, in the City of Oconto, Wisconsin. Construction 
was completed in September 1995 at a federal cost of 
$78,903 and non-federal cost of $19,950. Closeout 
activities are underway. Total funds expended in FY 95 
was $98,853. 
River Raisin, Monroe County, East Lloyd Road, MIFunds 
in the amount of $51,595 were expended in FY 95 
to complete the construction of approximately 450 feet of 
stone revetment along the River Raisin in Monroe County, 
MI. for protection of East Lloyd Road from further 
erosion. Construction was completed in September 1995. 
Financial closeout activities are underway. 
River Raisin, Monroe County, Pumpkinhook Road, 
MI - Planning and design activities to determine the 
Federal interest in protecting streambank erosion along the 
River Raisin adjacent to Pumpkinhook Road in Monroe 
County, MI, resulted in a recommendation to terminate 
the study due to lack of economic justification. The study 
was terminated 13 March 1995. Funds in the amount of 
$2,103 were expended in FY 95. 
St. Joseph River, Buchanan Township, MI - 
Construction to provide streambank erosion protection to 
1,600 feet of Red Bud Trail was completed in June 1995 
at a federal cost of $194,125 and non-federal cost of 
$84,529. Total funds expended in FY 95 were $278,655. 
77. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of the 
1962 River and Harbor Act. None. 
78. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES 
Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111 
of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. None. 
79. PROJECT MODIFICATION FOR 
IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF 
THE ENVIRONMENT 
Project modification activities -ursuant to Section 
1135(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986, as amended. Planning and design analysis is 
underway for construction of 6 temporary sea lamprey 
traps at the hydroelectric plant, Unit 10 Complex, Sault 
Ste. Marie, MI. Total funds expended in FY 95 for 
completing an initial appraisal report and initiating design 
activities were $26,900. 
Coordination Account. Funds in the amount of $2,032 
were expended in FY 95 to coordinate and attend meetings 
related to Section 1135(b) authority. 
21-41

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
Flood Control 
80. CLINTON RIVER SPILLWAY, MI 
Location. Clinton River Basin including its 
tributaries drains an area of 760 square miles in 
southeastern Michigan and empties into Lake St. Clair. 
Existing Project. The project consists of a two-mile 
long spillway channel connecting the Clinton River with 
Lake St. Clair and a fixed crest weir at the upstream end 
of the project, about 9 miles upstream of the river's 
mouth, in Mount Clemens, MI. (See Table 21-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local Cooperation. Clinton River Spillway Inter- 
County Drainage Board operates and maintains the 
project. 
Operations during fiscal year. The Corps initiated 
plans and specifications to correct a Congressionally 
determined design deficiency at the fixed crest weir. The 
purpose of this project modification is to improve the 
overall environment and associated beneficial uses of the 
lower Clinton River. Expenditures during FY 95 totaled 
$155,684 and resulted in a completed Design Analysis 
Report. 
81. FORT WAYNE METRO AREA, IN 
Location. Fort Wayne, which is located in northeastern 
Indiana in Allen County, is in the Maumee River drainage 
basin. In all, the Maumee basin covers an area of 6,586 
square miles. Of this area, 4,856 square miles are in 
northwest Ohio, 1,260 are in northeast Indiana and 470 
are in southeast Michigan. This basin is one of the largest 
and most important tributaries in the Great Lakes-St. 
Lawrence River system. There are four main tributary 
streams to the Maumee River: the Auglaize, Tiffin, St. 
Joseph and St. Marys Rivers. The St. Joseph and Tiffin 
Rivers originate in the hills of southern Michigan and flow 
southerly to the Maumee. The St. Marys and Auglaize 
originate in Ohio and flow northward. In the City of Fort 
Wayne, the St. Joseph and St. Marys Rivers join to form 
the headwaters of the Maumee River. From this point, 
the Maumee flows northeasterly and empties into Lake 
Erie at Toledo, Ohio. The central business district is 
located immediately on the south side of the Maumee and 
the St. Marys Rivers. The St. Joseph River bisects 
primarily residential areas on the north side of the central 
business district. While some portions of the central 
business district are prone to flooding in the immediate 
vicinity of the St. Marys River, the majority of the 
business district is sufficiently elevated to avoid flood 
damages. The residential areas, however, are generally 
low lying and are prone to frequent flooding. 
Existing Project. The Fort Wayne and Vicinity, 
Indiana, Flood Control Study was authorized by resolution 
of the Committee on Public Works, House of 
Representatives on October 12, 1972. The authorization 
requested that the Corps determine the advisability of 
providing improvements for flood control and allied 
purposes at and in the vicinity of Fort Wayne, Indiana. 
The study authorization resulted in completion of a Final 
Feasibility Report entitled "Fort Wayne and Vicinity, 
Indiana Flood Control Study," dated September 1987, and 
revised in April 1988, which identified and evaluated a 
number of different alternatives to flood control in the 
Fort Wayne area. The Final Feasibility Report also 
contained the "Final Environmental Impact Statement" for 
this project. Preparation of the General Design 
Memorandum began in August 1989 and was approved in 
December 1993. Construction was authorized in Section 
101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(Title 1 Public Law 101-640). This project was a 
Congressionally added new construction start in FY 1994. 
The Project Cooperative Agreement (PCA) was executed 
in August 1994 and construction was initiated in 
September 1995. The project will provide a 100-year 
level of flood protection to a large part of the central area 
of the City of Fort Wayne, Indiana which has experienced 
numerous flooding events in the past. The project is 
located along the north side of the St. Marys River, the 
east and west banks of the St. Joseph River, and the north 
bank of the Maumee River. Junk Ditch and Spy Run 
Creek which are tributary to the St. Marys River will also 
have protection installed or improved along their north and 
east banks respectively. The project area has been broken 
into four (4) segments which provide flood protection to 
various areas within the project limits. The West Segment 
is located along the St. Marys River and the Junk Ditch 
Tributary. The Central Segment is located along the Spy 
Run Tributary to the St. Marys River, a short section of 
the St. Marys River itself (at the confluence with the St. 
Joseph River), and along the west bank of the St. Joseph 
River. The East-North Segment is located along the east 
bank of the St. Joseph River and the East-South Segment 
is located along the north bank of the Maumee River. 
The total project length is approximately 54,000 feet. The 
project consists of several types of flood protection 
improvements. The most common type of flood 
21-42

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
protection improvements proposed are earth levees. The 
levees proposed are to have turf or rock protected slopes 
depending on the available space for their construction. 
Levees account for approximately 63 percent of the total 
project length. Concrete floodwails are proposed in those 
areas where insufficient space exists to construct levees 
due to site constraints. Concrete flood walls account for 
20 percent of the project length. An additional eight 
percent of the project length consists of a combination of 
a 1/2 Reduced levee and concrete L-Wall. The remaining 
length is composed of various types of road closures 
(stoplogs, clay dikes and high curbs), and 3,000 feet in 
several areas which do not require improvements due to 
adequate existing surface grades. The fully funded total 
project cost estimate is $44,738,000. The Federal cost is 
$33,866,000 and the non-Federal cost is $10,872,000. 
local Cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors for the 
project are the City of Fort Wayne and Allen County. A 
Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed with 
the Major of Fort Wayne and the Allen County Board of 
Commissioners on 22 August 1994. Under the terms of 
the PCA, the non-Federal sponsors shall contribute a 
minimum of 25 perdent, but not to exceed 50 percent, of 
the total project costs attributed to flood control purposes. 
This shall consist of all required lands, easements, rightsof-
way and relocations for the project; and a cash 
contribution equal to a minimum of five percent of the 
total project flood control cost. The Assistant Secretary 
of the Army (CW) has approved a credit in the amount of 
$1,123,500 under Section 104 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986. This will be applied to the 
non-Federal share of the project flood control cost. In 
addition to the above, the non-federal sponsor shall 
provide 50 percent of the total project recreation costs, 
100 percent of all betterment costs, and shall operate and 
maintain all works after completion. An initial cash 
contribution of $271,000 was provided on 22 June 1995, 
and an additional $564,000 was deposited inot an escrow 
account on 30 August 1995. Real estate requirements for 
the East-South Segment were completed on 27 July 1995, 
and acquisition activities for the East-North Segment were 
initiated. A Pastnering agreement for the East-South 
contract will be set up between the non-Federal sponsors, 
the Detroit District and the East-South Contractor. 
Operations during fiscal year. Expenditures of 
$1,506,972 were made to complete the Design 
Memorandum and plans and specifications, award a 
construction contract and initiate construction for the East- 
South Segment, and initiate preparation of a Design 
Menmorandum and plans and specifications for the 
East-North Segment. 
82. SAGINAW RIVER, MI 
Location. Saginaw River Basin including its tributaries, 
Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains 
an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of 
Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake 
Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 
miles upstream from mouth, are on Federally improved 
deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel (See Saginaw 
and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical 
Chart 14867). 
Existing project. Provides for improvements in 
Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: 
(a) at Sanilac Flats, MI, Middle Branch and South Branch, 
Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements 
by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, 
including a short reach of East Branch. This feature of 
the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, 
authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was 
deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 - Nov. 
17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (b) at Vassar on Cass 
River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north 
and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee 
construction floodwalls, modifications of Moore Drain, 
and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of 
$8,620,000 and non-Federal cost of $579,000 for 
construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to 
provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river 
by channel improvement, levee construction, and related 
work, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1974) of $410,900 
for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for 
flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of 
Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks 
by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and 
levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. 
cost (Oct. 1984) of $18,251,600 and non-Federal cost of 
$2,580,000 for construction; provided local interests 
contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, 
exclusive of colt of rights-of-ways; (e) at Corunna on 
Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by 
channel improvement, levee construction, and related 
work. This feature of the project for flood control, 
21-43

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act 
of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99- 
662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (f) at 
Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood 
protection by channel improvement. This feature of the 
project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized 
by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by 
the WRDA of 1986, PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th 
Congress, Title X; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, 
to provide for flood protection through non-structural 
(permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. cost 
(Apr. 1982) of $5,125,000 and non-Federal cost of 
$1,611,500 for implementation; however, project was 
reclassified to the "inactive" category on Dec.15, 1982; 
(h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four 
principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood 
protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel 
improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control 
structures and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 
1984) of $23,417,500 Federal and non-Federal cost of 
$2,705,000 which includes a cash contribution of 
$1,237,000; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 
percent of cost of rights-of-way for flood control and other 
work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half 
of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that 
the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed 
amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for 
Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom one-half 
cost of lands for conservation; and provided further that 
before starting work for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, 
Chief of Engineers and Director, Fish and Wildlife 
Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary 
of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of 
fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled 
storage of flood waters while preserving the maximum fish 
and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, 
for active portion (1984) is $50,700,000 Federal and 
$1,421,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total 
estimated cost (1984) to local interests is $5,870,000. 
Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must 
make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, 
and rights-of-way, including removal of buildings, for 
construction; hold the United States free from damage; 
maintain and operate all works after completion; establish 
and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments 
in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing 
highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge 
approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and 
existing highway bridges (except underpinning and bridge 
raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint 
River at Flint were furnished by city of Flint and accepted 
by the United States on Nov. 23, 1962. Estimated 
required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was 
furnished Feb. 20, 1963. An additional $117,000 was 
furnished by the City to cover increased construction 
costs. Required assurances for Cass River at 
Frankenmuth were accepted on Sep. 8, 1964. All 
necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been 
provided. The Midland City Council adopted a resolution 
on Jun. 7, 1982, declaring its intent not to sponsor the 
Flood Control project on the Tittabawassee River at 
Midland. The Vassar City Council, in a letter dated Jan. 
26, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide 
the assurances of local cooperation for the Vassar Flood 
Control Project. Saginaw County, in a resolution dated 
Aug. 11, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to 
provide the assurances of local cooperation for the 
Shiawassee Flats Flood Control Project. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: An 
adjustment of -$3,816 was made in contract cost for FY93 
South Bank, Section A repairs completed last FY. 
Engineering and design for repair of heaved concrete slabs 
near the Stevenson Bridge and in Section A was completed 
at a cost of $39,723. A contract was awarded for this 
work in the amount of $1,195,000. The contract was 
94% complete at the end of FY at a cost of $1,129,998. 
Engineering and design during construction cost $14,448. 
Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract 
at Hamilton Dam to be awarded next FY cost $66,117. 
Engineering and design for all remaining repairs cost 
$249,540. Supervision and administration cost $138,957. 
The Frankenmuth and Flint portions of the project are 
complete. The Flint River Segment at Flint, MI, was 
originally authorized under the Flood Control Act of 1958 
(PL 85-500). The flood protection project was completed 
September 5, 1979. In accordance with the 1962 Local 
Cooperation Agreement, the city of Flint is responsible to 
operate and maintain the project. Due to the lack of 
maintenance, the project requires extensive repairs. 
Revised total cost of repairs is estimated at $5.2 million. 
A total of $5.5 million has been authorized under the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Acts of 
1992, 1993 & 1994 ($1 million, $2 million and $2.5 
million respectively). These authorizations were intended 
to provide funds for a one-time repair and rehabilitation of 
this project to restore the project to original design 
dimensions. 
21-44

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
Total cost of the existing project to the end of FY was 
$28,415,297, of which $24,928,359 was for new work 
(includes $173,000 contributed funds) and $3,486,938 for 
maintenance. 
83.. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, 
.MI 
Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 105 
square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on the 
westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of 
Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of 
Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw 
River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of River. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) 
Existing project. Enlarging present channel of 
Sebewaing River through village of Sebewaing, MI, to a 
capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junction of 
Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward 
from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge 
and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; 
and removal of present dike on south side of channel 
lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to 
provide protection for village of Sebewaing from floods 
with a frequency of once in 15 years and with a magnitude 
greater than the maximum flood of record. (See Table 21- 
B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Complied with 
furnishing easements and rights-of-way for 
remaining portion of dike on south side 
lakeward from railroad bridge. 
except for 
removal of 
of channel 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and 
reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of 
$1,238. Total costs to the end of FY were $804,237. 
84. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
NAME OF PROJECT 
Battle Creek, Kalamazoo River, MI 
Burr Oak, Prairie River, MI 
Fort Wayne, IN 
Kawkawlin River, MI 
Mt. Clemens, MI, Clinton River Spillway 
DATE OF 
INSPECTION 
Jul. 
Sep. 
Oct. 
Dec. 
May 
1995 
1994 
1995 
1993 
1995 
NAME OF PROJECT 
Red Run, Clinton River, MI 
River Rouge, MI 
Saginaw River & Tributaries 
Frankenmuth 
Flint River 
Paw Paw Lake & River, Watervliet, MI 
Sebewaing River, MI 
DATE OF 
INSPECTION 
May 1995 
Sep. 1994 
Oct. 
Jan. 
Oct. 
Oct. 
1995 
1990 
1995 
1995 
85. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
See Table 21-E. 
86. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting 
(Public Law 84-99 and PL 93-288 and Antecedent 
Legislation). 
Project and Location FY Costs to Sep. 30. 1995 
Disaster Preparedness $ 263,457 
Emergency Operations $ -0- 
Rehabilitation $ -0- 
Advance Measures $ -0- 
Advance Measures (Contributed Funds) $ -0- 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 
1948 Flood Control Act. None. 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 
1954 Flood Control Act. None. 
Aquatic plant control activities pursuant to Section 
302 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (PL 89-298). 
None. 
87. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN 
BOUNDARY WATERS AND 
INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES 
Field Operations. As a continuing and ongoing 
mission, the Detroit District conducts hydraulic flow 
measurement surveys throughout the Great Lakes 
Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River system. 
These capabilities are unique within the Corps Districts 
(and other U.S. federal agencies) on the Great Lakes. 
21-45

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
During FY 95, the Detroit District conducted current 
velocity and discharge measurements on the St. Lawrence 
and Detroit Rivers. 
During spring 1995, the District collected conventional 
and Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) 
measurements on the Niagara River as part of the periodic 
verification of the Ashland Avenue, American Falls and 
Buffalo/Fort Erie stage-discharge rating curves for the 
International Niagara Board of Control. Between June 
and September 1995, the District continued gathering 
hydraulic data using the ADCP instrumentation at the 
sections established during FY 94 on the upper Detroit 
River; in addition, hydraulic measurements were initiated 
at seventeen new sections on the lower Detroit River. 
These hydraulic data sets are currently being used to 
develop one- and two-dimensional flow models of the 
river system, and to help refine the flow retardation 
estimates for weed conditions through the growing season. 
The District also collected ground truth data on a regular 
basis throughout the summer and fall on the extent and 
types of aquatic vegetation in the Detroit River system. 
As an adjunct to the aforementioned study, the District 
supported WES personnel in a hydro-acoustic survey of 
submerged vegetation in Lake St. Clair during August. 
Finally, the District has started a field program for 
verification of sediment transport in the Ashtabula River 
in support of Buffalo District and the Waterways 
Experiment Station using the ADCP technology to 
measure high flow events. 
The District plans to continue their efforts during FY 96 
in acquiring hydraulic data in the Detroit River, and to 
start hydraulic and hydrographic surveys in the St. Marys 
and St. Clair Rivers for development of flow models for 
those systems. Additionally, further measurements on the 
Ashtabula River in support of NCB and WES may result 
if the desired flow conditions occur. 
As an ongoing mission, during the winter months the 
District monitors the extent of ice in the St. Marys, St. 
Clair, and Detroit Rivers. Water levels are monitored 
continuously at key gages in these rivers to detect possible 
ice jams and potential flooding. This information can be 
used to provide advance warning to area residents and to 
trigger emergency actions by the Corps and other 
governmental agencies, including the National Weather 
Service and the Coast Guard. Currently, data are obtained 
through phone line interrogation of these gages or from a 
satellite downlink station using portable lap-top personal 
computers. These systems provide water level 
information to the District office within minutes of data 
collection. 
International Activities. The Detroit District has 
successfully supported the International Joint Commission 
(IJC) for many years. This has included numerous 
engineering and scientific assignments supporting the 
Commission's boards of control, working committees, and 
study boards. 
The following activities were conducted by the Detroit 
District, specifically for the IJC Boards and Committees: 
a. Members of the Detroit District staff attended the 
semi-annual meetings of the three Great Lakes Boards of 
Control. They also attended the spring appearances of the 
Boards before the UIJC, in Washington, D.C. in April 
1995, and the fall appearances, in Ottawa, Ontario in 
October 1995. 
b. IJC Levels Reference Study. As a result of record 
high Great Lakes water levels in 1985-86, the 
governments of the United States and Canada issued a 
Reference to the UIJC, on August 1, 1986, to initiate a new 
study to examine various methods of alleviating the 
adverse consequences of fluctuating water levels in the 
Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin. 
The Detroit District played a crucial role throughout the 
study. The District's contribution to these efforts 
included: identifying possible crises measures for 
alleviating adverse impacts of water level extremes; 
reviewing and proposing improvements to the existing 
operating plan for the regulation of Lake Superior; 
developing and testing hypothetical regulation plans to 
manage all or additional parts of the Great Lakes system; 
assessing and improving water level forecasts and 
statistics; preparing an inventory of coastal land uses and 
trends; identifying existing land use management practices 
and assessing their relative effectiveness to problem 
resolution; mapping shoreline geomorphology and offshore 
conditions, as well as the existing extent of 
structural protection; cataloging long-term coastal erosion 
and recession measurements; and estimating potential 
damages caused by existing lake gvels and potential future 
extremes. 
The Levels Reference Study Board sent their report to 
the IJC in March 1993. The report contained a set of 42 
recommendations. Most of these recommendations were 
endorsed by the UC, with slight modification, and 
21-46

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
forwarded in December 1993 to the governments of the 
United States and Canada for review and action. Many of 
these recommendations, if carried out to the extent 
outlined, would affect the way the Detroit District 
provides support to the nation under the Surveillance of 
Northern Boundary Waters and International Water 
Studies appropriations. 
C. International Lake Superior Board of Control. 
The Detroit District Engineer is the United States 
Regulation Representative of this Board. In support of the 
U.S. section of the Board, the District provided monthly 
Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a 
review of the hydrologic factors which influence the future 
regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations 
were based upon the use of probability forecasts of water 
supplies routed through the lakes using the approved 
operating rule, Plan 1977-A. Plan 1977-A has been in 
operational use since June 1990. Further proposed 
modifications of the regulation plan were explored by the 
Detroit District under the UIJC Levels Reference Study. In 
response to recommendations from this study, the IJC has 
requested that the Superior Board formally review the 
Orders of Approval and the regulation plan. This review 
is expected to begin in FY 96. 
During FY 95, ongoing repair work at the U.S. 
hydropower plants on the St. Marys River reduced their 
flow capacity. Several times during this period the 
outflow recommendations to the Board took into 
consideration this reduced capacity, and minor deviations 
from the Plan 1977-A prescribed outflows were authorized 
by the IJC. 
In FY 95, the District began a program to perform 
repairs on the U.S. portion of the Compensating Works in 
the St. Marys River. The repairs include repainting of the 
gates, concrete repairs to the piers, and replacement of 
gate sills and seals. This program is expected to take four 
years to complete. The District's continuing program to 
evaluate the hydraulic rating of the Compensating Works 
in the St. Marys River has been temporarily postponed, 
pending completion of this work. 
d. International Niagara Board of Control and 
International Niagara Working Committee. The 
District provides direct technical support and consulting 
engineering services to this Board and Committee. The 
Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology 
Branch is a member of the Committee. Under the 
auspices of the Committee, the Detroit District, with 
Canada, computes, coordinates, and publishes the monthly 
flows in the Niagara River. 
During FY 95, the Detroit District and the Water Survey 
of Canada conducted a series of discharge measurements 
in the upper Niagara River at the International Railway 
Bridge Section for verification of Lake Erie outflow 
equations. Information to date indicates that the existing 
equations are adequate during average flow ranges, but 
still require verification at the very high and very low 
extremes. Future measurements are scheduled for this 
section in FY 98, in accordance with the Board's 
recommendation to continue making them every three 
years. Based upon the results of the FY 98 measurements, 
the equations may be reevaluated. 
Due to the dynamic nature of the Niagara River at the 
Falls, the District is involved with periodic verification of 
the rating curves for the Ashland Avenue and American 
Falls gages. The Ashland Avenue relationship measures 
the total flow over the American and Canadian Falls to 
ensure that the Board operates within the terms of the 
Niagara Treaty. Discharge measurements for the Ashland 
Avenue rating curve are scheduled every three years. 
Measurements were made in FY 95, and the next series is 
scheduled for FY 98. Based upon the analysis of these 
data, the 1981 relationship will be reviewed. 
The American Falls Channel relationship provides a 
measure of the flow over the American Falls. 
Measurements are taken in the American Falls Channel 
every five years. Measurements were made in FY 95, 
and the next series is scheduled for FY 00. 
e. International St. Lawrence River Board of 
Control. In May, June, and November 1993, the Detroit 
District conducted current velocity measurements in the 
St. Lawrence River for this Board and the St. Lawrence 
Seaway Development Corporation. The May/June 
measurements were made when flows in the river were at 
record highs. Measurements were conducted at several 
critical locations in the river, using conventional 
techniques and also with new acoustic Doppler current 
profilers. Additional measurements were made, in 
November 1993, at a much lower flow rate. The data 
gathered have been used to calibrate a computer model 
developed for a critical section of the river, near the 
Copeland Cut. Further flow distribution measurements 
are scheduled, to recalibrate the mathematical model of the 
river, whenever flows are at very high or very low 
extremes. 
21-47

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
f. International Great Lakes Diversions and 
Consumptive Uses Study Board. The UIJC submitted its 
recommendations in 1985, to the governments of the 
United States and Canada, based upon the Board's 1981 
report and subsequent public hearings. The District 
expects to continue to provide support to the IJC relative 
to the evaluation of consumptive uses. 
g. International Great Lakes Technical Information 
Network Board. This Board is inactive at this time. The 
Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology 
Branch was the last Secretary to the U.S. Section, as well 
as a member of both the Hydraulics and Hydrology 
Committees. In 1984, the Board provided a report of its 
findings and recommendations to the UIJC. The IJC 
subsequently passed these on to the governments of the 
United States and Canada. 
Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic 
Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data. In FY 95, the Chief of 
the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch was 
the U.S. Secretary to this Committee, as well as a member 
of several subcommittees. Other Branch personnel also 
held membership on various subcommittees. 
During FY 95, the Coordinating Committee completed 
a review of its original mandates, realigned its 
subcommittees, and made changes to their Terms of 
Reference. There are now three subcommittees, down 
from four. They are Vertical Control-Water Levels, 
Hydraulics, and Hydrology. 
The District continued its support of Committee 
operations pertaining to the coordination of basic hydraulic 
and hydrologic data with Canada. District efforts have 
also continued to closely coordinate the formats of the 
U.S. and Canadian water level bulletins and to produce a 
coordinated "Users Guide", in order to avoid confusion 
and to better inform the public. 
In FY 94, District personnel finalized a Coordinating 
Committee report which documents all U.S. and Canadian 
discharge measurements made on the Great Lakes 
Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River during the 
period 1860 to 1993; Appendix B, "Chronologic 
Summaries of Construction and Dredging," to the report 
is pending, and is expected to be completed in FY 96. 
NCD Master Plan for the Water Control Data 
System. In FY 95, the Water Control Data System 
consisted of a network of Unix workstations and DOS 
based PCS. Presently, a PC collects water level data from 
the District's own Data Collection Platforms (DCPs). It 
also collects data from NOS/NOAA and Canadian MEDS 
computer systems. In FY 95 The Detroit District's 
homepage made Great Lakes information widely available 
across the Internet. 
Weather information and meteorological data are 
currently received and processed using a 486-PC and 
Windows software. The Detroit District has been 
designated the NCD retrieval site for NEXRAD data. The 
Detroit District has procured a Principal User Processor 
Interactive Emulator (PUPIE) to collect NEXRAD data on 
behalf of Detroit, Rock Island, Chicago, Buffalo, and St. 
Paul Districts, as well as North Central Division. The 
District currently collects data from available radar sites 
throughout NCD. As the quality of NEXRAD data 
improves it should provide significantly better estimates of 
precipitation on the Great Lakes surfaces and their 
drainage basins. 
The District has 30 active DCPs and plans to upgrade 
and possibly expand the network, based upon an on-going 
reviews of its water level gaging program. 
Great Lakes Information Management. The District 
has continued the development of a Geographic 
Information System (GIS) for the U.S. portion of the 
Great Lakes. The GIS is being generated to contain 
multiple information layers on the physiographic, 
economic, sociologic, environmental, and hydrologic 
characteristics of the Great Lakes region. The GIS is 
designed to create a "corporate data base" to support 
various District operations and studies. The District has 
completed a comprehensive assessment of current U.S. 
shoreline land uses, under the UC Levels Reference 
Study. Historical recession rate data, shore-type 
classification, shore protection and sub-aqueous material 
profiles were generated to support shoreline stage damage 
estimates and erosion loss modeling. In support of the 
USEPA/USACE Interagency Agreement for the Southeast 
Michigan Initiative (SEMI), the District has developed a 
desktop GIS to provide a multi-agency decision support 
system for environmental planning and restoration. To 
date the SEMI GIS covers eight major watersheds, and 
contains all contaminated sediment data sets collected by 
all U.S. and Canadian agencies for the last 20 years. 
Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes. Water 
supply forecasts are used routinely by the Great Lakes 
21-48

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch in forecasting water 
levels and regulating the outflows from Lakes Superior 
and Ontario. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes 
water level forecasting system, including investigations 
into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance 
relationship (i.e., runoff, over-water precipitation, 
evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use of real-time 
hydrologic data were continued by the staff of the Branch. 
Levels of the Great Lakes. The Great Lakes 
Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch continued to make 
routine short-term (15 days to one month) and long-term 
(six months) Great Lakes still water level forecasts. These 
forecasts are distributed in the form of weekly, bimonthly 
and monthly news releases and bulletins. The Monthly 
Bulletin of Lake Levels for the Great Lakes, containing a 
six month projection of Great Lakes water levels, has a 
circulation of about 12,000 copies per month. Included 
with the monthly bulletin was an informational enclosure 
entitled "Great Lakes Update," which consists of various 
topics of interest pertaining to the Great Lakes, 
information on possible storm induced water level rises at 
key locations on the Great Lakes, and incidental 
information on Great Lakes hydrology. 
Branch personnel provided technical information and 
expertise regarding recorded lake levels and still water 
lake level forecasts to many interested parties, such as 
members of Congress, State and local officials, news 
media, navigation and power interests, concerned property 
owners, and recreational boaters. Upon request, water 
level information was supplied to the public in the form of 
telephonic and written responses to inquiries, personal 
addresses to various civic groups, and interviews with the 
news media. Daily reports on present water levels, 
precipitation and significant events on the Great Lakes 
basin, are currently being made available on the District's 
water control data system. Forecasted and historical water 
level data are also available on this system. Interested 
agencies and individuals can retrieve this information at 
any time via communication devices, such as a computer 
modem or a network board. As previously mentioned, the 
District now has a homepage on the Internet, and much of 
the above information is also available through this 
source. 
The total cost for FY 95 under the Surveillance of 
Northern Boundary Waters was $2,466,743, and under the 
International Water Studies, $240,332. 
General Investigations 
88. SURVEYS 
Federal funds in the amount of $35,065 were used to 
complete the Reconnaissance study at Lower Kinnickinnic 
River in Milwaukee, WI. Due to lack of economic 
justification, no further action was recommended at Lower 
Kinnickinnic. FY 95 funds in the amount of $47,116 
were used to complete the study of contaminated 
sediments in Milwaukee Harbor, WI. Federal funds in the 
amount of $688 were used to complete a Master Plan 
Study for flood control for St. Joseph, South Bend, IN. 
FY 95 funds in the amount of $33 were used to complete 
the Reconnaissance study at Clinton River Spillway, MI. 
The Clinton River Spillway was a FY 94 Congressional 
Add which provided funds for construction. Funds in the 
amount of $173,421 were expended to continue the 
Section 216 restudy of Federal interest for Fox River, WI. 
Environmental Services for FY 95 amounted to $3,544. 
Coordination Studies with other Agencies include: 
Special Investigations, $51,528; FERC Licensing, $1,895; 
Interagency Water Resource Development, $15,606; 
National Estuary Study, $8,244; North American Water 
Fowl, $3,776; Cooperation with Other Water Resource 
Agencies, $5,432; Great Lakes Remedial Action, $9,890; 
and Section 22, Planning Assistance to States and Tribes 
include: Indian Workshops - $1,193; Oneida Tribe, GIS, 
WI - $68,003; Oneida Tribe, Watershed, WI - $38,485; 
Menominee Tribe, WI - $33,531; Delta Twp, Eaton 
County, MI - $4,964; Lake St. Clair Aquatic Vegetation 
Study, MI - $47,458; Mole Lake Tribe, WI - $4,930; 
Potawatomi Tribe, WI - $9,415; Lake Trout Spawning, 
WI - $8,460; PAS General, IN - $3,887; and PAS 
General - $23,511. 
89. PRECONSTRUCTION 
ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
ST. JOSEPH RIVER, SOUTH BEND, IN 
Funds in the amount of $220,972 were expended in FY 
95 to initiate the Preconstruction Engineering and Design 
(PED) work activities. 
The project involves bank stabilization along the north 
and south banks of the St. Joseph River at and adjacent to 
21-49

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
the Indiana University South Bend campus, development 
of athletic facilities on the south side of the river, 
development of a multi-use trail on the north side of the 
river and construction of a pedestrian bridge to link the 
main campus with the south side expansion. The work 
was authorized by a Congressional Add to the 1995 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 
which provided $300,000 toward PED activities. 
GREAT LAKES CONNECTING CHANNELS 
AND HARBORS, REPLACEMENT LOCK 
Funds in the amount of $200,937 were expended in FY 
95 to initiate preconstruction engineering and design work 
activities. 
The project, as authorized in the WRDA of 1986 and the 
WRDA of 1990, calls for constructing a second lock able 
to accommodate the largest vessels engaged in Great 
Lakes commerce. The authorized dimensions are 1,294 
feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth. 
The authorized cost (1985) is $227,428,000. The new 
lock would replace two existing locks that are only 80 feet 
in width and 23 feet in depth. The project had not been 
funded earlier due to lack of a local sponsor. Given the 
delay in initiating preconstruction engineering and design, 
the initial work effort is preparing a limited re-evaluation 
report to assure that the project remains economically 
justified. 
90. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
BASIC DATA 
Flood Plain Management Services. Fiscal Year 95 
costs in the amount of $275,500 were associated with the 
following tasks under the Flood Plain Management 
Services Program; Unit - $58,687, Technical Services - 
$50,736, National Flood Proofing Committee - $5,945, 
Quick Responses - $6,529, Guides, Pamphlets and 
Supporting Studies - $14,900, Native American 
Workshops - $1,355, Specials Studies for; Wisconsin 
Dam Break and Wave Runup Workshops - $4,408, Little 
Rice Lake Wisconsin Dam Break Analysis $14,840, 
Midland County Michigan Flood Profile Study - $44,853, 
Flood Proofing Workshop, Fort Wayne, Indiana - $5,000, 
HEC II Advanced Workshops in Indiana - $15,626, HEC 
I and HEC II Advanced Workshops in Michigan - 
$15,001, Duluth area Minnesota Highwater Marker 
Placement Study - $12,451, St. Louis County Minnesota 
Chain of Lakes Flood Profile Study - $14,847, and the 
continuation of the Flood Plain Geographical Information 
System Data Base for Michigan - $10,067, and Germania 
Marsh Wisconsin Dam Break Analysis - $255. 
Flood Insurance Studies. Three Flood Insurance Studies 
were completed in FY 95 for Ozaukee County, Wisconsin; 
and the Michigan entities of Fork Township, Mecosta 
County; and Delta County. The FY 95 costs for the three 
studies were $34,206, $25,068, and $2,008, respectively. 
A Wave Runup Sensitivity Special study for $1,336 was 
closed out in FY 95. Three Michigan Flood Insurance 
Studies for Oakland County, Cannon Township, Kent 
County, and Delta Township Eaton County were initiated 
in FY 95. The FY 95 costs associated with these studies 
were $56,100, $58,268 and $34,787, respectively. FY 95 
ongoing coordination costs for completed Michigan studies 
at Farmington Hills, Oakland County, and Saginaw River 
Basin, and the Wisconsin studies at Sheboygan County, 
and New Berlin, Waukesha County, were $22,356, $187, 
$184, and $147, respectively. A final coordination 
meeting was held on a completed Michigan Flood 
Insurance Study for Isabella County. The FY 95 costs for 
this activity was $794. 
Costs in FY 95 in support of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency's Community Assistance and Limited 
Map Maintenance Programs, were $801 and $1,241. In 
FY 95, Hydrologic Studies cost $3,796, and International 
Water Studies, $79,559. 
21-50

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
1. Algoma Harbor, WI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
34,981 305,526 
34,981 299,839 
38,582 
.38,650 
0
0 
292,010' 
292,0101 
11,526 1,373,362 
13,403 1,369,620 
Arcadia Harbor, MI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost, 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
62,000 
64,063 
78,000 
78,576 
0
0 
98,000 
101,136 
0
0 
76,000 4,611,029 
77,320 4,610,084 
3. Ashland Harbor, WI 
4. Bayport Harbor, MI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Contribution 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
42,000 411,000 320,000 
33,788 400,391 338,894 
1,695,645 
1,695,645 
100,431 4,158,336 
95,460 4,153,365 
0
0 
201,000 (28,769) 
213,620 (16,882) 
20,000 
97,117 
6,954 
8,476 
(7,601) 
17,113 
93,597 
93,597 
7,975 424,853 
7,997 424,421 
0
0
0
0 
137,399 
137,399 
792 
792 
Big Bay Harbor, MI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
0
0 
21-51 
390,4332 
390,4332

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
5. Big Bay Harbor, MI 
(Continued) 
6. Big Suamico River, WI 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0 
5,103 
(901) 23,574 
2,200 21,429 
91,000 1,483,807 
89,864 1,480,153 
0
0 
20,243 
20,243 
9,030 167,667 227,446 
9,030 164,558 225,622 
1,287 1,196,318 
4,218 1,194,318 
7. Black River Harbor, MI 
(P.H.) 
Contributed Funds 
8. Black River Harbor, MI 
(U.P.) 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0 
15,000 
11,641 
0
0
0
0 
(3,122) 
2,662 
480,2443 
480,2443 
349,921 
349,921 
45,972 
36,718 
85,000 1,453,094' 
86,291 1,444,655' 
0
0 
106,759 
89,398 
1,117 
13,251 
383,350' 
383,350Q5 
39,000 
40,011 
134,012 996,054 
136,723 994,549 
9. Bolles Harbor, MI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0 
5,447 
7,561 
0
0
0
0 
66,079 
35,847 
25,957 
54,125 
217,916 
217,916 
255,000 
255,000 
343,000 2,421,462 
325,440 2,399,883 
21-52

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
9. Bolles Harbor, MI 
(Continued) 
10. Caseville Harbor, MI 
Contributed Funds 
11. Cedar River Harbor, MI 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0
0
0 
11,000 
5,716 
0
0
0
0
0
0 
314 
5,435 
0
0 
1,190,550 
1,190,550 
293,657 
293,657 
293,657 
293,657 
0
0
0
0 
11,608 
12,156 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
179,665 1,529,884 
141,217 1,491,164 
178,000 393,000 
172,339 387,339 
12. Charlevoix Harbor, MI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
436,000 497,000 
394,739 512,180 
0
0 
82,000 
106,938 
0
0 
180,623 
180,623 
247,051 9,513,619 
245,822 9,510,021 
0
0 
1,129,396 
1,129,396 
13. Cheboygan Harbor, MI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
540,236 
504,236 
65,047 996,228 
57,112 988,293 
21-53

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
14. Clinton River, MI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0 
0
0
0
0 
1,208,000 335,000 
1,118,347 448,770 
48,000 
47,771 
0
0
0
0 
260,0466 
260,0466 
289,752 
289,752 
40,000 3,508,381 
42,443 3,505,971 
3,796,180 
3,796,180 
15. Cornucopia Harbor, WI 
16. Detroit River, MI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Contribution 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
00 
60,458 
63,196 
(871) 
2,810 
462,653 
462,653 
22,305 
22,350 
58,000 1,065,889 
50,368 1,058,257 
0
0 
76,877,3577 
76,877,357' 
6,118,390 4,796,000 3,227,000 3,999,000 110,052,899 
5,940,222 4,808,815 3,421,098 4,022,825 110,023,724 
361,235 
361,235 
0
0 
00
42,470,585 
42,470,585 
17. Duluth-Superior Harbor, 
MN & WI 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
60,000 152,000 340,000 
69,902 152,022 337,990 
83,400 16,894,658' 
85,425 16,894,658' 
21-54

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
17. Duluth-Superior Harbor, 
MN & WI 
Contributed Funds 
(Continued) 
18. Fox River, WI 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0 298,000 
0 113,328 
34,000 332,000 
218,357 331,685 
3,188,000 2,753,000 2,936,000 2,794,500 62,027,442 
3,227,459 2,722,490 2,835,586 2,901,586 61,981,494 
0
0
0 
8,235 
(1,000) 
(94) 
0 
143 
0 1,556,249 
0 1,556,249 
0 11,555,410 
0 11,555,410 
00
3,753,3349 
3,753,3349 
1,655,000 1,684,000 1,772,000 2,240,000 51,600,72610 
1,681,004 1,583,242 1,792,894 2,271,569 51,525,80110 
19. Frankfort Harbor, MI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
1,923,450 
1,923,450 
31,709 
31,709 
401,000 436,000 1,278,000 
352,122 465,215 1,251,635 
00 
0
0 
791,000 9,816,832 
838,728 9,815,114 
0
0
0
0 
1,204,500 
1,204,500 
274,776 
274,776 
20. Grand Haven Harbor, MI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
21-55 
00
1,283,469" 
1,283,469"

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
20. Grand Haven Harbor, MI 
(Continued) 
Section 111 
Contributed Funds 
Section 111 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Contribution 
Cost, 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
0
0 
1,071,000 1,137,000 907,000 
996,141 1,202,282 836,806 
(11,615) 
0 
87,000 
82,125 
175,000 
175,000 
835,000 27,827,909 
892,197 27,798,75312 
15,585 
15,585 
780,400 
780,400 
58,000 
60,150 
72,000 
73,875 
64,000 2,354,861 
66,623 2,353,255 
813,613 
813,613 
21. Grand Marais Harbor, MN New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
209,274 
204,118 
450,972 
450,972 
(3,347) 150,227 
982 105,622 
30,172 2,373,105 
72,937 2,370,437 
22. Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, 
MI 
Section 111 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0 
(2,722) 
2,560 
7,253 
7,253 
0
0
0
0 
266,037 
266,037 
63,528 
63,528 
966 127,354 2,023,898 
966 123,781 2,020,325 
21-56

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
23. Green Bay Harbor, WI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
9 ,9 4 6 ,3 9 513.14,1 
9,946,39513.14.15
s 
1,485,000 3,351,000 2,429,000 1,037,000 33,726,69216 
1,474,891 3,319,926 2,437,809 1,054,603 33,704,85016 
187,000 125,000 
233,418 135,987 
47,000 
47,686 
60,000 7,704,747 
59,450 7,702,092 
24. Greilickville Harbor, MI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
3,249 
3,249 
3,450 
3,450 
96,239 
92,867 
369,55717 
369,557" 
17,901 277,229 
17,607 273,563 
25. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI 
Section 111 
Section 111 
26. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
1,015,366 
1,015,366 
77,000 
77,000 
50,572 141,520 307,750 
48,420 137,699 307,287 
0
0 
0
0 
12,507 968,513 
18,657 968,227 
50,000 
50,000 
0
0 
2,360,610 400,000 
2,355,758 397,234 
0
0 
15,000 
29,563 
1,200,598 
1,200,598 
37,073 14,730,312 
35,679 14,726,277 
0
0 
243,100 
243,100 
21-57

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
26. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI 
(Continued) 
27. Harrisville Harbor, MI 
Contributed Funds 
Section 111 
Section 111 
28. Holland Harbor, MI 
Contributed Funds 
Section 111 
Section 111 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0 
5,026 188,000 
5,026 174,683 
78,861 
88,081 
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 
0
0
0
0
0
0 
898,000 463,000 426,000 
863,373 521,865 426,674 
194,504 
194,504 
1,849,938 
1,849,938 
287,454 
287,454 
502,000 
502,000 
29,225 1,279,620 
33,029 1,279,327 
88,000 
88,000 
736,12218 
736,12218 
35,705 
35,705 
621,000 
621,000 
465,000 22,607,10419 
452,240 22,585,48419 
0
0 
61,000 
58,048 
53,000 
52,855 
91,000 
89,314 
1,663,300 
1,663,300 
58,000 2,012,916 
59,569 2,007,311 
21-58

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
28. Holland Harbor, MI 
(Continued) 
29. Inland Route, MI 
Contributed Funds 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0
0
0 
42,000 
45,196 
0
0
0
0
0
0 
31,000 
24,207 
77,000 
57,884
0
0 
502,452 
502,452 
770,222 
770,222 
148,000 
148,000 
102,000 2,727,116 
129,075 2,726,702 
0
0 
404,300 
404,300 
30. Kenosha Harbor, WI 
31. Kewaunee Harbor, WI 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
38,000 
31,462 
2,362 
11,688 
46,723 
46,970 
0
0 
988,969~.21 
988,9692021 
143,587 6,578,800" 
142,035 6,577,248n 
0
0
0
0
0
0 
651,000 171,000 126,000 
659,256 157,210 138,042 
4,378,600 
4,378,600 
1,270,275 
1,270,275 
758,333"' 
758,333" 
206,000 6,833,168u 
201,626 6,826,18924 
2,961,461 
2,961,461 
617,300 
617,300 
21-59

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
32. Keweenaw Waterway, MI 
33. Lac La Belle Harbor, MI 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
a 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
0
0 
5,974,141 
5,974,141 
531,000 889,000 1,243,000 644,000 25,857,215" 
556,970 922,122 1,240,744 651,567 25,837,744 
0
0
0
0 
1,355 
1,355 
3,762 
3,762 
95,286 
93,698 
1,523,500 
1,523,500 
269,27026 
269,2706 
42,955 701,029 
43,973 700,459 
34. Lake St. Clair, MI, 
Channels 
35. Leland Harbor, MI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
250,000 239,000 161,000 
251,463 239,225 157,838 
0
0 
7 ,6 75 ,3 5 7 ' 
7 ,67 5 ,35 7 ' 
193,000 8,534,870 
177,119 8,515,757 
0
0 
0
0
0
0 
0
0
0
0 
127,000 120,000 108,000 
133,719 114,690 109,348 
0
0 
0
0 
5,119,800 
5,119,800 
672,950 
672,950 
354,139 
354,139 
233,974 2,790,496 
236,051 2,788,510 
70,678 
70,678 
21-60

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
36. Lexington Harbor, MI 
Contributed Funds 
Section 111 
Section 111 
37. Little Lake Harbor, MI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0
0
0 
20,165 
12,747 
27,000 
19,605 
(6,181) 
3,453 
0
0
0
0 
5,152 
5,479 
(6,000) 526,000 
2,079 518,964 
0
0
0
0 
1,646,304 
1,646,304 
1,088,888 
1,088,888 
372,000 
372,000 
22,900 599,211 
20,273 596,584 
67,000 1,846,986 
69,039 1,841,934 
0
0
0
0 
259,000 
232,309 
542,808 
542,808 
57,670 
57,670 
88,000 141,000 
112,629 141,141 
123,000 4,235,972 
121,518 4,228,296 
38. Ludington Harbor, MI 
Section 111 
Section 111 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
7,912,202" 
7,912,202" 
620,000 
620,000 
237,000 651,000 2,093,000 1,499,000 16,728,7483 
172,589 720,717 2,090,122 1,499,488 16,724,5733 
0
0 
717,340 
717,340 
21-61

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
38. Ludington Harbor MI 
(Continued) 
39. Manistee Harbor, MI 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0 
0
0 
o 0
0 
357,913 
357,913 
2,696,52231 
2,696,52231 
0
0 
746,000 552,000 1,051,000 1,593,000 10,938,69132 
699,314 559,317 1,090,603 1,590,316 10,932,67332 
0
0 
1,374,164 
1,374,164 
40. Manitowoc Harbor, WI 
Contributed Funds 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Contribution 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
2,048,91433 
2,048,91433 
1,911,130 
1,911,130 
C 
335,000 198,000 546,000 
292,048 224,532 563,129 
3,700
0 
3,700
0 
3,700 
21,572 
800,000 8,273,664 
793,371 8,264,565" 
3,700 
25,888
0
0 
48,095 
47,460 
3,081,756 
3,081,756 
41. Marquette Harbor, MI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriationi 
Cost 
0
0 
415,000 
393,520 
(9,962) 
14,178
0
0 
2,602 
2,677 
0
0 
1,282,893" 
1,282,893"s 
278,141 2,904,538" 
270,495 2,896,892' 
465,757 
465,757 
21-62

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
42. Menominee Harbor & 
River, MI & WI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0 
125,000 
126,922
0
0
0
0 
0
0
0
0 
533,476" 
533,47637 
36,762 
36,762 
27,049 130,000 
21,633 135,544 
39,459 2,741,177" 
39,951 2,741,133" 
0
0
0
0 
593,660 
593,660 
1,351,852 
1,351,852 
43. Milwaukee Harbor, WI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Contribution 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0 8,231,024w 
0 8,231,024w 
664,000 1,666,000 
628,124 1,657,587 
0 
2,486 
772,000 2,985,000 36,859,313" 
788,697 2,965,150 36,801,076 ' 
(2,549) 
48,176 
322,471 
322,471 
0
0
0
0 
0
0
0
0 
6,380,925 
6,380,925 
12,715,560 
12,715,560 
44. Monroe Harbor, MI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
0
0
0
0 
0
0
0
0 
687,340 
687,340 
300,000 
300,000 
21-63

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
44. Monroe Harbor, MI 
(Continued) 
Contributed Funds 
Contributed Funds 
45. Muskegon Harbor, MI 
Section 111 
Section 111 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Contribution 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Contribution 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
1,177,000 218,000 783,000 
1,179,928 176,576 799,882 
(8,000) 
(8,027) 
0 
27 
0
0
0
0
0
0 
112,000 257,000 869,000 
124,105 252,329 872,681 
0
0
0
0 
80,000 200,000 
0 269,336 
68,000 19,369,151 
88,211 19,360,484 
0
0
0
0
0
0 
166,667 
166,667 
38,606,400 
38,606,400 
83,182 
83,182 
2,912,110" 
2,912,110" 
105,000 
105,000 
540,000 9,121,44142 
518,168 9,095,25942 
324,000 2,938,700 
332,267 2,936,303 
13,824,300 
13,824,300 
46. New Buffalo Harbor, MI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
1,285,716 
1,285,716 
1,186,467 
1,186,467 
180,000 
182,350 
14,757 537,000 
19,209 534,022 
130,000 4,674,894 
95,412 4,637,302 
21-64

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
46. New Buffalo Harbor, MI 
(Continued) 
47. Oconto Harbor, WI 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0 
308,000 563,000 
282,570 583,877 
0
0 
58,000 
60,941 
0
0 
181,500 
181,500 
130,7540 
130,754 
32,326 2,187,506" 
33,536 2,186,249" 
48. Ontonagon Harbor, MI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
953,9O3's 
953,903 s 
2,119,000 1,756,000 2,510,000 1,922,000 19,187,884" 
2,100,709 1,846,577 2,246,034 2,125,775 19,117,894" 
0
0 
21,000 
21,000 
49. Pcnsaukee Harbor, WI 
50. Pcntwater Harbor, MI 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
147,227 253,880 
134,528 261,399 
34,035 
34,035 
246 
667 
0
0 
17,444 674,450 
19,371 671,618 
0
0 
155,000 111,000 299,000 
157,522 108,522 293,860 
179,899 
179,899 
212,000 4,834,268 
214,181 4,828,240 
21-65

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
51. Point Lookout Harbor, MI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Contribution 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
26,962 488,016 
26,962 459,310 
13,000 
37,546 
2,642,584 
2,642,584 
10,984 3,850,728 
13,121 3,848,705 
0
0
0
0 
9,257 
9,257 
121,600 
121,600 
52. Port Austin Harbor, MI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
3,191,234 
3,191,234 
172,100 
172,000 
37,792 1,812,314 
33,190 1,807,712 
159,000 
159,000 
53. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI 
Contributed Funds 
Section 111 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0
0
0 
5,000 
(1,058) 
8,241 
16,399 
0
0 
6,949 
6,959 
909,963 
909,963 
487,108 
487,108 
336,000 
336,000 
36,811 2,191,491 
31,147 2,185,827 
21-66

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
53. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI 
(Continued) 
Contributed Funds 
Section 111 
Maintenance 
Contribution 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
54. Port Washington Harbor, 
WI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0 
211,945 
207,152 
15,844 
20,166
0
0 
2,582,20447 
2,582,204 47 
1,624,000 
1,624,000 
73,789 
61,888
0
0 
111,000 3,057,103" 
122,067 3,055,727 a 
10,621 
10,621 
55. Port Wing Harbor, WI 
56. Portage Lake Harbor, MI 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
0
0 
5,298 122,057 
6,428 120,191 
0
0 
0
0 
13,000 
14,884 
63,393 
63,393 
27,775 1,158,752 
31,495 1,157,718 
0
0 
38,127 107,171 140,749 
38,127 89,467 157,302 
256,129 
256,129 
29,903 2,253,841 
27,416 2,250,204 
21-67 
0
0
0
0 
0
0 
28,000 
22,216 
0
0
0 
5,643 
0
0
0
0
0
0 
115,000 
115,000 
9,158 
9,158 
1,074,251 
1,074,251 
0 
838

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
57. Presque Isle Harbor, MI 
Section 111 
58. Rouge River, MI 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0 
126,000 612,000 
120,845 599,877 
14,000 
24,013 
0
0
0
0 
0
0 
1,190,492 
1,190,492 
61,700 
61,700 
25,000 1,757,997 
28,658 1,754,243 
0
0
0
0 
16,500 
16,500 
76,500 
76,500 
675,251" 
675,25149 
214,000 664,000 191,000 
175,858 675,007 196,116 
418,000 21,670,9415 
436,535 21,661,50750 
0
0 
14,907,318 
14,907,318 
59. Saginaw River, MI 
(Federal Funds) 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0 
14,917,127x1 
14,917,12731 
13,600 
13,600 
1,142,000 3,300,000 1,474,000 2,032,000 51,942,363 
1,097,782 3,291,316 1,529,323 2,027,624 51,922,110 
283,000 281,000 227,000 
292,307 282,813 236,413 
195,000 20,951,890$2 
187,106 20,943,168x2 
21-68

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
o 
60. St. Clair River, MI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
0
0 
1,438,000 1,103,000 866,000 
1,424,512 1,092,663 866,269 
19,213,246 
19,213,246 
593,000 24,546,109 
618,607 24,530,106 
61. St. Joseph Harbor, MI 
Section 111 
Section 111 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0
0
0 
0
0
0
0 
865,000 435,000 720,000 
839,689 447,859 753,469 
976,485" 
976,48553 
828,000 
82800 
540,000 16,961,738 
531,891 16,949,665 
0
0 
638,076 
638,076 
55,000 241,000 268,000 1,024,000 6,635,450 
84,028 233,928 264,576 1,020,925 6,618,135 
0
0 
962,216 
962,216 
62. St. Marys River, MI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Contribution 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
160,657,071' 
160,657,071 ' 
13,402,000 13,398,000 17,837,000 19,287,800 298,569,221 
13,358,322 13,803,035 17,809,409 19,381,994 298,215,587 
340,000
0 
0 340,000 
169,999 169,999 
13,100 
13,100 
21-69

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
63. Saugatuck Harbor & 
Kalamazoo River, MI 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
156,950 118,000 
156,641 111,879 
67,000 
69,782 
364,527" 
364,527 ss 
149,000 3,882,178" 
143,120 3,872,509 
64. Saxon Harbor, WI 
Section 111 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
507,50757 
507,50757 
204,270 
204,270 
1,717 
1,717 
14,539 
14,539 
83,296 
78,596 
19,730 845,430 
21,238 842,238 
65. Sheboygan Harbor, WI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
222,000 709,000 289,000 
228,238 676,445 314,633 
0
0
0
0 
1,136,088" 
1,136,088" 
393,000 7,892,878" 
397,399 7,886,214" 
0
0
0
0 
907,792 
907,792 
609,028 
609,028 
66. Silver Bay Harbor, MN New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
2,600,000 
43,780 
0 2,600,000 
76,530 120,310 
67. South Haven Harbor, MI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
21-70 
0
0 
452,4266 
452,4266

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
67. South Haven Harbor, MI 
(Continued) 
Section 111 
Section 111 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
154,556 152,759 1,199,000 
142,608 132,774 1,226,670 
0 
404 
0
0
0
0
0
0 
185,000 
178,969 
532,000 
532,000 
536,000 5,929,22661 
538,563 5,927,5261 
42,381 
42,381 
273,000 1,616,933 
277,111 1,615,013 
1,632,076 
1,632,076 
68. Sturgeon Bay, WI, and 
Lake Michigan Ship 
Canal, WI 
69. Two Harbors, MN 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
436,000 198,000 272,000 
394,906 204,130 276,233 
0
0
0
0 
1,059,7220 
1,059,722a 
793,000 9,860,451e 
823,504 9,855,0553 
311,119 
311,119 
884,899 
884,899 
0
0 
1,371,000 100,000 
1,373,352 101,884 
11,479 
14,901 
71,787 5,238,148 
68,319 5,234,680 
70. Two Rivers Harbor, WI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
21-71 
0
0 
360,320' 
360,320 
4,170,710

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
70. Two Rivers Harbor, WI 
(Continued) 
71. White Lake Harbor, MI 
Section 111 
Section 111 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Diked Disposal 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Rehabilitation 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
164,000 
161,622 
45,457 
41,162 
27,000 
32,202 
0
0
0
0 
0
0 
221,000 6,334,757# 
218,220 6,330,506" 
1,187,472 
1,187,472 
58,057 
58,057 
0
0
0
0 
17,567 
17,567 
1,000 
4,827 
13,372 
13,372 
139,863 
98,016
0 
200 
207,862 
207,862 
249,700 
249,700 
84,333 2,828,854 
122,683 2,825,357 
57,000 983,615 
33,314 959,929 
80. Clinton River Spillway, MI New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
2,000,000 
229,978 
0 3,136,008 
155,684 1,521,671 
81. Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
666,000 640,000 
483,054 822,108 
0 1,138,000 4,885,000 
1,313 1,168,633 4,872,972 
82. Saginaw River-1958 Act 
Flint, MI 
Contributed Funds 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Contribution 
Cost 
00 
0
0 
21-72 
24,755,359 
24,755,359 
173,000 
173,000

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
1,000,000 
505,883 
420,000 474,000 2,606,000 4,500,000 
821,207 524,881 1,634,967 3,486,938 
83. Sebewaing River, MI 
87. Surveillance of Northern 
Boundary Waters 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropriation 
Cost 
Maintenance 
Appropriation 
Cost 
0
0 
(2,000) 
(266) 
6,000 
4,079 
5,000 
6,894 
0
0 
365,642 
365,642 
4,000 441,455 
1,238 438,595 
0
0 
1,988,000 2,280,000 2,505,000 2,662,500 57,096,334 
2,025,027 2,139,231 2,596,064 2,707,075 57,013,87967 
21-73

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
1lncludes $92,774 for previous projects. 
Excludes $56,500 contributed funds. 
3Includes $85,849 for previous projects. 
4Includes $12,008 for maintenance of previous 
projects. 
SExcludes $30,000 contributed funds. 
6Includes $25,500 for previous projects. 
Includes $2,097,254 for previous projects. 
Includes $1,547,195 for new work for 
previous projects. 
9Includes $3,239,910 for previous projects. 
10lIncludes $89,309 for previous projects. 
"Includes $311,329 for previous projects. 
'Includes $13,437 for previous projects.; 
13Includes $396,974 for previous projects. 
14Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 
"Excludes $100,000 contributed funds. 
16Includes $8,918 for previous projects. 
17Excludes $121,000 contributed funds. 
1 lncludes $176,620 for previous projects. 
'9lncludes $127,598 for previous projects. 
2Includes $453,839 for previous projects. 
21Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 
"Includes $21,818 for previous projects. 
3Includes $149,312 for previous projects. 
Includes $88,364 for previous projects. 
2 lncludes $402,242 for previous projects. 
26Excludes $38,190 contributed funds. 
27Includes $656,000 for previous projects. 
"Includes $235,346 for previous projects. 
~Includes $491,416 for previous projects. 
"Excludes $136,286 contributed funds. 
31lncludes $354,999 for previous projects. 
32Includes $150,910 for previous projects. 
33Includes $400,126 for previous projects. 
Includes $54,288 for previous projects. 
3sIncludes $312,423 for previous projects. 
"Includes $36,194 for previous projects. 
"37Includes $312,423 for previous projects. 
"Includes $36,194 for previous projects. 
"39Includes $1,293,220 for previous projects. 
~Includes $459,305 for previous projects. 
41Includes $613,408 for previous projects. 
42lncludes $446,183 for previous projects. 
Includes $84,569 for previous projects. 
"Includes $8,161 for previous projects. 
45lIncludes $284,802 for previous projects. 
4Includes $113,326 for previous projects. 
47Includes $188,495 for previous projects. 
4 lncludes $15,123 for previous projects. 
49lncludes $50,084 for previous projects. 
'Includes $56,608 for previous projects. 
51lncludes $962,556 for previous projects. 
S2Includes $1,671,660 public works funds and 
$49,419 emergency relief funds. 
53Includes $503,113 for previous projects. 
'Includes $2,904,807 for previous projects. 
"Ilncludes $90,232 for previous projects. 
"Includes $117,554 for previous projects. 
57Excludes $50,193 contributed funds. 
"Includes $487,817 for previous projects. 
59lncludes $87,131 for previous projects. 
6Includes $187,233 for previous projects. 
61lIncludes $131,239 for previous projects. 
~Includes $323,419 for previous projects. 
nIncludes $219,730 for previous projects. 
"Includes $48,404 National Recovery Act for 
new work funds. 
cIncludes $212,857 for previous projects. 
"Includes $33,113 for previous projects. 
"Includes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 
21-74

TABLE 21-B (Continued) 
DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 3, 1871 
Nov. 17, 1988 
Mar. 3, 1905 
Aug. 5, 1886 
Aug. 11, 1888 
Mar. 3, 1899 
Jun. 6, 1990 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 14, 1960 
May 20, 1965 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Sep. 19, 1890 
Jul. 13, 1892 
Sep. 22, 1922 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Apr. 23, 1970 
ALGOMA HARBOR, WI (See Section 1 of Text) 
Outer basin enclosed by a north pier 1,102 feet long and a south breakwater 
1,530 feet long, a 2,100 foot entrance channel and outer basin. 
Deauthorization of the outer harbor basin feature of the navigation project. 
ARCADIA HARBOR, MI (See Section 2 of Text) 
Maintenance of existing 12-foot channel. 
ASHLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 3 of Text) 
Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a shoal. 
Appropriation of $60,000 for 'Continuing improvements on enlarged 
project' (On completion of Poe Lock in 1896, with available depth of 
20 feet, dredging at Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) 
Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from shore at a point 
2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. 
Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth 
and extent of channel to be dredged. 
Widening part of present channel for entrance channel and for basin 
in eastern part of harbor. 
Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far as 8th Ave. 
West, extended to 21 feet. 
Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end. 
Deepening portions of east basin and west channel to 27 and 21 feet, 
respectively. 
BAY PORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 4 of Text) 
Channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide. 
BIG BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 5 of Text) 
Provides for converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel 
between piers and a rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 
12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. 
BIG SUAMICO RIVER, WI (See Section 6 of Text) 
Channel from Green Bay to 1,800 feet above the river mouth 
BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI (See Section 7 of Text) 
Channel from mouth of Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. 
Channel from Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge to Washington Ave. 
Consolidation of projects for Black River at Port Huron and 
Mouth of Black River. 
Settling Basin. 
Deepening channel and settling basin to 20 feet, and widening to 100 feet 
2 bends; 1 at the foot of 12th St., the other below the Grand Trunk R.R. 
Bridge. 
Extension of existing channel. 
River and Harbor Act 
H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong. 2d Sess., 
Sec. 52(c) of the WRDA of 1988. 
H. Doc. 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 
1887, p. 1966. 
H. Doc. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 
S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 46, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 337, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 165, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
Section 107, 1960 Rivers and 
Harbors Act. 
H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. l 
H. Doc. 498, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.- 
Annual Report, 1889, p. 2291. 
No Printed Report. 
H. Doc. 436, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 162, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 
54, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. 
Section 107, 1960 Rivers and 
Harbors Act. 
21-75

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 6, 1965 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Aug. 2, 1882 
Oct. 28, 1965 
Aug. 14, 1876 
Aug. 2. 1882 
Jun 13, 1902 
Jun. 20, 1938 
Nov. 17, 1988 
Mar. 29, 1977 
Jun. 2, 1896 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Aug. 26, 1937 
May 17, 1950 
Oct. 21, 1964 
Aug. 5, 1886 
Jul. 19, 1963 
BLACK RIVER HARBOR, MI (UPPER PENINSULA) 
(See Section 8 of Text) 
Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, 
an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. Project depths 12 feet 
in approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. 
BOLLES HARBOR, MI (See Section 9 of Text) 
Entrance channel in Lake Erie, Access channel in LaPlaisance Creek, 
Steel sheet pile revetment. 
CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 10 of Text) 
Channel 10 to 8 feet deep protected by Breakwater. 
CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI (See Section 11 of Text) 
Dredge an entrance channel (datum at 580.69 feet above mean tide at 
New York) and construct two parallel piers extending lakeward from 
mouth of Cedar River. 
Modification of project to provide for two parallel entrance piers 
including a new rubblemound east pier with a sport fishing walkway; 
an entrance channel from Green Bay to mouth of Cedar River, and 
a turning basin. 
CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI (See Section 12 of Text) 
Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake protected where needed 
by piers and revetments. 
Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. 
Project depth increased to 15 feet. 
Project depth increased to 18 feet. 
Restore recreational uses or provide comparable recreational uses at the 
South Pier. 
Project depth increased to 24 and 23 feet, and construction of revetment 
upstream of Highway Bridge. 
CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI (See Section 13 of Text) 
18 1/2 foot channel. 
8 1/2 foot channel. 
Turning Basin. 
21-foot channel to East 1st St., Enlarge Turning Basin 
deepen to 21 feet. 
Breakwater. 
CLINTON RIVER, MI (See Section 14 of Text) 
Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing channels and 
making Cutoff, and revetments as needed. 
Widening entrance channel and constructing protected harbor basin. 
H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
Section 107, 1960 Rivers and 
Harbors Act. 
H. Doc. 64, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
S. Ex. Doc. 12, 47th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 248, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 
S. Ex. Doc. 16, 44th Cong., 1st Sess. 
and Annual Report 1876, p. 523. 
No Prior Survey of Estimates. 
No Prior Survey of Estimates. 
S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' 
H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess., 
Sec. 25 of the WRDA of 1988. 
Section 107, 1960 Rivers and 
Harbors Act. 
Annual Report, 1895, p. 2823 
H. Doc. 357, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 134, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 269, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 
Section 107, 1960 River and 
Harbor Act. 
S. Doc. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Annual Report, 1880, p. 2062, and 
H. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess., 
and Annual Report, 1886, p. 219. 
Section 107, 1960 Rivers and 
Harbors Act. 
21-76

TABLE 21-B (Continued) 
DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Mar. 3, 1905 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Mar. 4, 1913 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935' 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 24, 1946 2 
May 17, 1950 
Mar. 21, 1956 " 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Aug. 13, 1968 " 
CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI (See Section 15 of Text) 
Entrance channel 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep between existing piers 
from bay to a turning basin 200 feet long, 8 feet deep, with maximum 
width of 180 feet, with 150- and 300-ffot inner channels each 50 feet 
wide and 8 feet deep. 
Reconstruction and Federal maintenance of ease and west entrance piers, 
a 25-foot extension of west pier and a 300-foot extension of existing 
westerly inner channel at a depth of 8 feet and a width of 50 feet. 
DETROIT RIVER, MI (See Section 16 of Text) 
Amherstburg Channel and removal of Grosse Ile Shoal. 
Fighting Island Channel. 
Livingstone Channel. 
Channel Depths of 26 and 25 feet. 
Channel to Wyandotte 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide through Middle 
Ground opposite Head of Fighting Island. 
Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse Ile). 
American Channel North of Belle Isle between Windmill Point and 
Fairway Slip, Detroit. 
Deepen Westerly 300 feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef 
Channel below Livingstone Channel to 27 feet to provide depths 
adequate for 24-foot draft navigation when governing Lakes are at 
Datum, with necessary widening at approaches and bends and 
construction of necessary compensating works, Detroit River. 
Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 feet. Dredge through 
East Draw of lower Grosse Ile Bridge and extend 300-foot width of 
Channel North of lower Grosse Ile Bridge. 
Channel Depth of 28.5 feet throughout downbound and Two-Way 
Channels, except in upper (27.7-foot depth) and lower (29-foot depth), 
Livingstone Channel, and in upbound Channel; 27-foot depth in Ballards 
Reef Channel below junction with Livingstone Channel, 27.5-foot depth 
in westerly 300-foot width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg 
Reaches, and 28.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Hackett 
Beach, with necessary compensation works. Also 28.5-foot depth in 
Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal, inclusive. 
Trenton Channel: Deepen to 25 feet, where necessary, Wyandotte Reach 
from Detroit River to Upper Grosse Ile Bridge, about 5.5 miles, deepen 
to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet below Upper Grosse Ile Bridge to and 
including a Turning Basin 28 feet deep and 15 feet across in area outside 
project limits. 
Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet from Upper 
Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 feet from downstream: 
Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a depth of 28 feet, 
width of 830 feet, and length of 1,500 feet: Build compensating works 
to maintain water levels. 
S. Committee, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 434, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' 
H. Doc. 712, 56th Cong., 1st. Sess. 
and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. 
H. Doc. 17, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 266, 59th Cong., 1st Sess.; 
676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess.; and 
322, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st. Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 
1, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' 
H. Doc. 205, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. 
S. Doc. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' 
S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
H. Doe. 338, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
21-77

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Jun. 3, 1896 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Mar. 2, 1907 
May 28, 1908 s 
Jul. 27, 1916 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Jul. 30, 1930 3 
Aug. 30, 1930 3 
Jul. 16, 1952 4.6 
Jul. 14, 1960 ** 
Oct. 4, 1961 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Aug. 5, 1886 
Sep. 19, 1890 
Jun. 3, 1896 
Jun. 3, 1896 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Mar. 3, 1925 ' " 
Jun. 26, 1934 '9 
Jul. 3, 1958 to 
Oct. 31, 1992 
Jun. 23, 1866 " 
Mar. 3, 1925 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Oct. 27, 1965 
DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI 
(See Section 17 of Text) 
Dredging. 
Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. 
Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw 
span of Burlington Northern railway bridge. 
Dredging additional area of basin inside Duluth entrance to 22-foot 
depth. 
Enlarging Superior Harbor Basin. 
Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. 
Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. 
Deepening and widening channels and basins. 
Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 
25 feet. 
Present project dimensions of channels and basin. 
Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. 
Deepen portions of the North and South Channels, the entire Upper 
Channel and Minnesota Channel to 27 feet; widen the Cross Channel 
turning basin to 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule 
Bridge to 600 feet, and construct an upland CDF. 
FOX RIVER, WI (See Section 18 of Text) 
Improvement of Fox River. 
Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. 
Improvement of Wolf River. 
Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calumet and Miller Bay, and of 
Brothertown Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. 
Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and 
a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. 
Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War 
Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. 
Sec. 108, that Federal project structure, appurtenances, and real property 
of Upper Fox River, WI, be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. 
Sec. 332 authorized transfer of navigation system to Wisconsin subject to 
agreement, Federal government to continue water regulation/dam 
operation. 
FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 19 of Text) 
A New Outlet 12 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. 
Exterior Breakwaters, removal of portions of Piers, Project 
Dimensions of Outer Basin. 
Dredge the area in Lake Betsie. 
Deepen approach and entrance channels. Extend Inner Basin and 
Dredge recreational anchorage area. 
H.Ex. Doc. 59, 53d Cong., 3rd Seas. 
and Annual Report, 1895, p. 2538. 
H. Doe. 82, 59th Cong., 2d Seas. 
H. Doe. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 651, 64th Cong., 1st Seas. 
H. Doc. 1018, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doe. 145, 69th Cong., 1st Seas., 
and Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doe. 32, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 482, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 374, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 150, 86th Cong., 1st Seas.; 
H. Doc. 196, 86th Cong., 1st Seas. 
H. Doc. 204, 99th Cong., 2d Seas. 
Sec. 202a of WRDA of 1986. 
Annual Report, 1885, pp. 2041-2045 
(plan of a board approach Dec. 10, 
1884, as modified by Corps of 
Engineers, May 14, 1886). 
H. Ex. Doe. 24, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. 
Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. 
No prior survey or estimates. 
No prior survey or estimates. 
No prior survey or estimates. 
H. Doe. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. t 
S. Bill 3910, 85th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Public Law 102-580 (WRDA of 
1992). 
H. Doe. 482, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doe. 208, 68th Cong., 1st Seas. 
H. Doc. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Seas., 
S. Doe 16, 89th Cong., 1st Seas.' 
21-78

TABLE 21-B (Continued) 
DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Jun. 23, 1866 
Jun. 14, 1880 
Sep. 19, 1890 
Jul. 13, 1892 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Mar. 3, 1879 
Aug. 30, 1935 
May 17, 1950 
Mar 2, 1945 
Jun. 23, 1866 
Jul. 13, 1892 
Jun. 26, 1910 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Mar. 3, 1925 
Aug. 30, 1935 2 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Nov. 17, 1986 
GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 20 of Text) 
Piers and Revetments. 
Piers and Revetments. 
Piers and Revetments. 
Piers and Revetments. 
Present Project dimensions of Harbor channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry 
Slip and River Channel. Eliminating all of that portion of Grand River 
above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and River. 
Channel to Spring Lake. 
Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to 
Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin. 
Deepen the harbor entrance channel and harbor river channel to 29 and 
27 feet, respectively; provide a new and larger turning basin, 
trapezoidal in shape, 1,200 feet long at the channel, 300 feet long at 
the shore, 800 feet at a right angle to the channel, and 18 feet deep. 
GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN (See Section 21 of Text) 
Breakwaters and dredging of anchorage area of 26 acres to 16 feet. 
Seawalls across ledge in southeast corner of harbor, enlarging anchorage 
basin and deepening of entrance. 
Small-boat basin with breakwater. 
GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 22 of Text) 
Two parallel piers, an entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. 
Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project 
area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. 
GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI (See Section 23 of Text) 
Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Island.' 2 
Inner channel.13 
Turning basin at DePere. 
Maintenance of turning basin at DePere. 
Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. 
Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside 
of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through city of Green 
Bay to 22 feet. 
Turning basin above Chicago & North Western R.R. Bridge. 
Turning basin at mouth of East River. 
Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to'26 by 500 feet; 
3.6 miles of entrance channel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of 
existing Fox River to 24 feet deep. 
Deepen the Fox River channel at Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. 
S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess 
S. Ex. Doe 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess 
S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess 
S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess 
S. Doc. 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 
1, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' 
H. Doc. 661, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.' 
H. Doc. 227, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Sec. 202a of WRDA of 1986. 
H. Ex. Doc. 75, 43rd Cong., 2d 
Sess.; Annual Report, 1875, p. 184 . 
Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 
22, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' 
H. Doc. 187, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' 
H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong. 2d Sess. 
Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. 
Unpublished report approved 
Aug. 3, 1892. 
H. Doc. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doe. 1017, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doe. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 
40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 
73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doe. 95, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doe. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th 
Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986, 
Sec. 601c). 
21-79

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
1948 
Jun. 26, 1964 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 3, 1871 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Jul. 16, 1984 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Aug. 30, 1852 
Mar. 2, 1867 
Mar. 3, 1899 
Mar. 3, 1905 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Sep. 3, 1954 " 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Sep. 2, 1964 
Mar. 3, 1899 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Aug. 30, 1935 2 
May 17, 1950 
Oct. 23, 1962 " 
GREILICKVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 24 of Text) 
Basin 600-foot wide, 850-foot long with a depth of 14 feet in outer 
350 feet of the area and a 10-foot depth in remainder. Breakwater 
1,300 feet long. 
Attached Rubblemound Breakwater and Breakwater extension. 
HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 25 of Text) 
Harbor of Refuge, breakwaters, 10-foot depth in harbor basin, 12-foot 
depth in entrance channel. 
HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MI (See Section 26 of Text) 
Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. Closing North Entrance and 
dredging Main Entrance and Anchorage Area. 
Removal of portion of Breakwater in interest of sanitation. 
Deepen the waterway within the Marina facility. 
HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 27 of Text) 
Harbor of Refuge, Breakwaters; 12-foot depth entrance channel 
10-foot depth in harbor basin. 
Extend north end of south breakwater 100 feet; extend southeast end 
of north breakwater 145 feet; install two navigation light structures. 
HOLLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 28 of Text) 
Artificial channel between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan. 12 
Piers and Revetments.1 2 
Extending Inner Piers. 
Converging Breakwater. 
Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland. 
Present Project Dimensions of Channels at Turning Basin. 
Widen Bend in Revetted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, 
Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. 
THE INLAND ROUTE, MI (See Section 29 of Text) 
Channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep through Lakes and Rivers with 
suitable jetties. 
Lock and Dam. 
KENOSHA HARBOR, WI (See Section 30 of Text) 
Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater.12 
Extending Breakwater 200 feet. 
Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. 
Channel northwesterly from basin. 
Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen 
approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. 
River and Harbor Act. 
H. Doc. 546, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. 
River and Harbor Act. 
H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Annual Report, 1873, p. 282; 
H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess.; 
P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 105. 
H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor 
Act. 
S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Annual Report, 1866, p. 106. 
H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess.; 
and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950. 
Annual Report, 1905, p. 2176; 
H. Doc. 588, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 
48, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 142, 82d Cong., 1st Sess.' 
Chief of Engineers. 
H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess.; 
Annual Report, 1897, p. 2772; 
H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3rd Sess.; 
Annual Report, 1899, p. 1817. 
H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 3, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.1 
21-80

TABLE 21-B (Continued) 
DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 3, 1881 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Aug. 30, 1935 214 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Sep. 19, 1890 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Aug. 30, 1935 is 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Aug. 5, 1886 
Jul. 13, 1892 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1933 3 
Mar. 21, 1956 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Oct. 23, 1962 
KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 31 of Text) 
Entrance piers. 
Turning basin. 
North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance 
channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. 
Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, 
and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a maximum width of 
500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. 
KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (See Section 32 of Text) 
Acquision of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, 
renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance 
to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel 
depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase 
in width and depth of channel approved May 15, 1898). 
Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about one-half mile long, 
800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, 
and for purchase of necessary land. 
Princess Point Cutoff channel. 
General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins 
to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at entrances, extend 
lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of 
structures due to deepening channels. 
Deauthorization of the uncompleted portion of the project authorized by 
the 1935 Rivers and Harbors Act. 
LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 33 of Text) 
Two parallel piers at the entrance, 584 and 682 feet; an entrance channel 
between the piers 50 feet wide and 12 feet deep, 820 feet long with a 
flared approach and inner canal 50 feet wide, 10 feet deep, and 730 feet 
long. 
LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS (See Section 34 of Text) 
Two Dikes. 
Deepening Canal and dredging Channel at Grosse Pointe. 
Second Canal for downbound vessels. 
21-foot depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for about 5.25 miles. 
25-foot depth through Canals and Channel through Lake St. Clair. 
Removal of Center Dike and widening Channel to 700 feet. 
Deepening Channel to 27.5 feet and abandonment of Channel above 
mouth of Southeast bend cutoff Channel. 
LELAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 35 of Text) 
Entrance Channel protected by Piers. 
Outer Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Approach Channel and removal 
of North Pier. 
Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082. 
H. Doc. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' 
S. Doc. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
H. Ex. Doc. 105, 49th Cong., 2d 
Sess.; and Annual Report, 1887, 
p. 1977. 
H. Doc. 325, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' 
H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th 
Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). 
H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Annual Report, 1961, p. 1039. 
Annual Report, 1885, p. 2150. 
H. Doc. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 188, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 3, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 
S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 23, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 
21-81

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1867 
Mar. 3, 1899 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Dec. 31, 1970 
Mar. 2, 1867 
Sep. 19, 1890 
Jul. 25, 1912 
Jul. 3, 1920 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Aug. 30, 1935 17 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Oct. 23, 1962 * 
Dec. 31, 1968 
(Sec. 107 of 
1960 R & H) 
Jun. 26, 1979 
LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 36 of Text) 
Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.' 
LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 37 of Text) 
12-foot deep Channel from Lake Superior into Little Lake Breakwaters 
and Revetments. 
LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 38 of Text) 
Entrance Piers. 
Pier Extension, Reconstruction and repairs to existing structures 
and present project dimensions of Channel. 
Breakwaters, Shore Connections, and Removal of outer ends of the 
two inner piers. 
Deepen Channels and widen opening between breakwaters. 
MANISTEE HARBOR, MI (See Section 39 of Text) 
Entrance Piers. 
Extending Channel 8,000 feet to connect with Manistee Lake, and 
further Pier extension. 
Depth of 20 feet in Outer Harbor 570 feet wide to Outer end of South 
Pier 18 feet deep in river, South Breakwater with shore connection, 
and extend North Pier if required. 
23-foot depths in entrance channel and 21-foot depths in River Channel. 
Remove old South Revetment, Construct new South Pier and Revetment, 
and widen river entrance Channel. 
Present project dimensions of Channel through Outer Basin and River, 
and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. 
MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI (See Section 40 of Text) 
Breakwaters. 
Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of 
old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal 
south of shore end of south breakwater. 
Channel in river. 
Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor 
to 25 feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th Street, and Upper River 
Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. 
Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream. 
Construct 765-foot long stone Breakwater, and rubblemound bulkhead; 
construct 360-foot long entrance Breakwater; dredge 16,500 cubic 
yards for entrance channel. 
H. Doc. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Seas.' 
H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Seas.' 
Annual Report, 1867, p. 114.16 
H. Doc. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess.; 
and Annual Report, 1897, p. 2951. 
H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Seas.; 
and Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess.' 6 
H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Seas.' 
Annual Report, 1867, p. 115. 
Annual Report, 1891, P. 2678. 
H. Doc. 599, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. 
S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., as 
modified by Rivers and Harbors 
Comm. Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 39, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 80, 74th Cong., 2d Seas. 
H. Doc. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Seas. 
Jun. 1967 Detailed Project Report 
Apr. 1982 Supplement.' 
Sec. 107, 1960 Rivers and 
Harbors Act. 
21-82

TABLE 21-B (Continued) 
DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 2, 1867 
Aug. 11, 1888 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Aug. 30, 1935' 
Jul. 11, 1960 
Mar. 3, 1871 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Mar. 4, 1913 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Jun. 27, 1967 
(Sec. 107) 
Aug. 30, 1852 
Mar. 3, 1883 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Sep. 22, 1922 
Aug. 30, 1935 * 
Mar. 2, 1945 'g 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Feb. 24, 1835 '9 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Jul. 14, 1932 21 
Nov. 17 1986 
MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI (See Section 41 of Text) 
Breakwaters, 2,000 feet long. 
Extending the breakwater 1,000 feet. 
Additional 1,500-foot extension to breakwater and removing a shoal 
in northerly part of harbor. 
Deepening harbor to 25 feet. 
Deepening harbor to 27 feet. 
MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI 
(See Section 42 of Text) 
Entrance piers. 
Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. 
Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by 
Act of May 3, 1905. 
20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. 
21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge turning basin. 
Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. 
Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels 
to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. 
Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. 
facilities to 19 feet. 
MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 43 of Text) 
North Pier.12 
Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater.' 2 
South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. 
Extend north breakwater; a south breakwater; present project 
dimensions of inner entrance channel. 
Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21-foot depth. 
Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. 
Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. 
Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide 
through breakwater; deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, 
outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 
27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo Street, and in Kinnickinnic River 
to Chicago & North Western R.R. bridges. 
MONROE HARBOR, MI (See Section 44 of Text) 
9-foot channel, protecting Revetments and Piers. 
21-foot channel, dikes and turning basin." 
Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation imposed by Act of 
Jul. 3, 1930. 
Deepen portion of existing navigation channel to 27 feet; deepen lake 
channel to 28 feet; widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet; dredge a 
new turning basin 24 feet deep, 1,600 feet wide at river's mouth; and 
H. Ex. Doc. 56, 39th Cong., 2d 
Sess., pts. 1 and 2; and Annual 
Report, 1866, pp. 8 and 77. 
Annual Report, 1889, pp. 272 
and 2021. 
H. Doc. 573, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doe. 20, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 154, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 
Annual Report, 1867, p. 132. 
H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 171, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doe. 28, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doe. 228, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doe. 113, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Detailed Project Report, Dec. 1966.' 
S. Doe. 175, 25th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Annual Report, 1881, p. 2122. 
Annual Report, 1906, p. 1752 (No 
prior survey or estimate affecting 
breakwater extensions). 
H. Doe. 804, 66th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 289, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 
S. Doc. 29, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 134, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
Annual Report, 1872, p. 237. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 22, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doe. 12, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.; 
45, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th 
Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). 
21-83

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Mar. 3, 1925 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Aug. 2, 1882 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Oct. 23, 1962 " 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Aug. 2, 1882 
1883 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Jun. 27, 1967 
Sec. 107 
Mar. 2, 1945 
construct a 190 acre CDF in Plum Creek Bay to enable creation of a 
700 acre marsh behind the CDF. 
MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 45 of Text) 
Piers and Revetments. 
Breakwaters. 
Repairing Revetments around Car Ferry Slip. 
Channel deepening and present project dimensions of channel. Piers 
and Revetments. 
NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI (See Section 46 of Text) 
Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long 
to mouth of Galien River, new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 
740 feet, respectively, deepening inner channel to Galien River to 
8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. 
OCONTO HARBOR, WI (See Section 47 of Text) 
Piers, except for inner 300 feet of south pier and 250 feet north pier 
built by city.2 
Present project dimensions of channel and turning basin. 
ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 48 of Text) 
Channel 17 feet deep and 150 feet wide through bar and 15 feet deep 
and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. 
Modified project widths and provide inner basin. 
Enlarging and deepening the existing harbor basin. 
Deauthorization of the turning basin feature of the project authorized 
by the 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act. 
PENSAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 49 of Text) 
Construction of slab pier 2,500 feet long on the north side of the 
channel and dredging a channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep. 
Extending pier to 10-foot contour (2,700 feet) and dredging to 
10 feet below Datum. 
Dredging entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. 
PENTWATER HARBOR, MI (See Section 50 of Text) 
Piers and revetments, dredging. 
Piers and revetments, dredging. 
Piers and revetments, dredging. 
Piers and revetments, dredging. 
Present project depth of channel. 
POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR, (AU GRES RIVER), MI 
(See Section 51 of Text) 
Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Channel Dredging. 
H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doe. 494, 67th Cong., 4th Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doe. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
H. Doe. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Annual Report, 1881, p. 2066. 
H. Doc. 538, 61st Cong., 
2d Sess., Plan C.' 
H. Doc. 602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. 
S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 287, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th 
Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). 
H. Doe. 153, 42d Cong., 3rd Sess. 
R & H Act, Aug. 2, 1882 Modified. 
H. Doc. 478, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 181, 39th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 
21-84

TABLE 21-B (Continued) 
DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 16, 1984 
Jul. 11, 1987 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 11, 1870 
Aug. 14, 1876 
Aug. 30, 1935 * 
Jul. 3, 1958 " 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Jun. 30, 1948 
Aug. 5, 1977 
Mar. 3, 1879 
Jun. 3, 1896 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Aug. 30, 1 9 3 5 224 
Jul. 3, 1958 2 
Oct. 23, 19622 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Jul. 3, 1930 
PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI (See Section 52 of Text) 
Breakwater, Anchorage Basin, Channel Dredging. 
Construct a breakwater access for recreation purposes. 
H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Seas. 
H. R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Seas. 
P. L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 106 
P. L. 100-71. 
Breakwater. 
PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI (See Section 53 of Text) 
Entrance Channel 12 feet deep, Anchorage Basin, Breakwater. 
PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI (See Section 54 of Text) 
North pier and south basin. n '2 
North basin. 
North breakwater, removal of 650 feet of north pier, outer turning 
basin, present project dimensions of channel and basin and extension 
of south breakwater. 
Extending and raising of north breakwater and placing rubble along 
sides; removing 456 feet of south breakwater and dredging in outer basin. 
PORT WING HARBOR, WI (See Section 55 of Text) 
Construction of parallel piers and dredging. 
Dredging inner channels and abandonment of certain revetments 
and channels. 
Deauthorization of 50 feet of entrance channel widening. 
PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 56 of Text) 
Entrance channel 18 feet deep protected by piers and revetments. 
PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 57 of Text) 
Breakwater, 1,000 feet long. 
Shore extension, 216 feet long. 
For dredging and rubblemound extension to breakwater 1,600 feet 
long; Changed designation of project. 
Deepening harbor from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. 
ROUGE RIVER, MI (See Section 58 of Text) 
21-foot channel via the Shortcut Canal. 
25-foot channel at mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 feet long and adjacent 
to latter; 21-foot channel extending from junction of Old Channel and 
Shortcut Canal into Old Channel to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. 
Bridge. 
Old Channel; 100 feet wide from Peerless Cement Corp. to Junction with 
Shortcut Canal widened to 150 feet at 2 bends. 
25-foot channel over modified limits from Detroit River to Jefferson 
Avenue (via Shortcut Canal). 
SAGINAW RIVER, MI (See Section 59 of Text) 
Channel 200 feet wide, with depth of 18.5 feet in Bay and 16.5 feet 
in River. 
Project Depth of 18.5 feet extended up River to Saginaw. 
H. Doe. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Ex. Doe. 28, 41st Cong., 2d Sess. 
and Annual Report, 1879, p. 119. 
Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, p. 379. 
H. Doe. 168, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 
and Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 41, 74th Cong., 1st Seas. 
H. Doc. 446, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' 
H. Doc. 114, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doe. 668, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Annual Report 1879, p. 1634 30 
H. Doe. 318, 54th Cong., 1st. Sess.; 
Annual Report, 1903, pp. 474, 1823 
H. Doe. 473, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doe. 145, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doe. 1063, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 23 
H. Doe. 125, 85th Cong., 1st. Sess. 
H. Doe. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Seas. l 
H. Doe. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doe. 30, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. 
21-85

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Jun. 20, 1938 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Jul. 13, 1892 
Jul. 8,.1930 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 24, 1946 * 
Mar. 21, 1956 2 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Mar. 3, 1875 
Jun. 14, 1880 
Mar. 3, 1899 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Jun. 2, 1937 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Jul. 11, 1870 
Aug. 5, 1886 
Jul. 13, 1892 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Turning Basin. 
Present project channel dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge 
in Saginaw. 
New Channel in Bay, 350 feet wide and 24 feet deep from 24-foot 
contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 feet in River Channel 
up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 feet 
in River Channel up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at 
Essexville and Carrollton, and elimination of present Channel in Bay. 
Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac 
Bridge, Extend 22-foot project above Sixth Street Bridge, Deepen 
Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 new Turning Basins.' 
Deepen River Channel to 25 feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge 
to New York Central Railroad Bridge. o 
ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (See Section 60 of Text) 
20-foot Channel in the River. 
Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 feet, and Compensating Works. 
Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 feet. 
Widen and deepen Southeast Bend and improve Outlet of North 
Channel, St. Clair River. 
Deepen and further improve Channels in St. Clair River between limits 
of 27.1 to 30 feet to provide safe navigation by vessels with drafts 
of 25.5 feet. A cutoff Channel in Canada at Southeast Bend and 
abandon old Southeast Bend Channels. 
Deauthorization of the work authorized by the Rivers and harbors Act 
of Jul. 24, 1946. 
ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI (See Section 61 of Text) 
Interior Revetments.26 
Benton Harbor Canal.26 
Present project dimensions of piers and a turning basin. 
Present project dimensions of the channel and turning basin near 
mouth of Paw Paw River. 
Abandon easterly 1,000 feet of canal above west line of 9th Street. 
Turning basin above mouth of Morrison Channel and eliminate turning 
basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. 
Maintenance of turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. 
ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (See Section 62 of Text) 
Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by MacArthur Lock), widen and 
deepen existing State Channel.26 
Poe Lock.1 
Dredging through shoals above falls and shoals below falls between 
lower end of Canal and upper entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet 
(formerly Hay Lake). 
Enlarging the Old Channel. 
Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels work in that section of River 
below Locks. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 21, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. 
H. Doc. 500, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 240, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
H. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 309, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. 
S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th 
Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). 
H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d 
Sess., and Annual Report, 1875, 
pt. 1, p. 162. 
Annual Report, 1880, pp. 2030, 
2031, 2049, and 2055. 
H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., 
and Annual Report, 1898, p. 2496. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 52, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 
S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
Report by Maj. O.M. Poe, Corps of 
Engineers, not published. 
H. Ex. Doc. 72, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Ex. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d 
Sess., and Annual Report, 1891, 
p. 2810. 
H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Seas., 
and 215, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. 
H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. 
21-86

TABLE 21-B (Continued) 
DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 3, 1907 
Mar. 3, 1909 
Jul. 25, 1912 
Mar. 4, 1915 
Sep. 22, 1922 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Jun. 26, 1934 9 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Mar. 7, 1942 
Jun. 15, 1943 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 24, 1946 
Mar. 21, 1956 
Jul. 9, 1956 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Jun. 3. 1896 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Davis Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. 
Lease of Waterpower at Falls, Lease entered into with Michigan Northern 
Power Company provided for construction of remedial and compensating 
works. 
Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). 
Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. 
Widen upper approach to Canals through Vidal Shoals, extend 
anchorage and maneuver area below locks. 
Remove Round Island, middle ground extension of Northwest Canal 
Pier, and widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. 
Deepen Channels throughout downbound Route. 
Operation and Care of Canal and Locks provided from War Department 
Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. 
Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. 
Construct new (MacArthur) Lock on site of former Weitzel Lock, deepen 
approach Channels to 27 feet, and reconstruct approach Piers. 
Name 'MacArthur' Lock and changed name of 'Fourth' Lock to 
'Sabin' Lock. 
Remove Bridge Island and construct new Hydroelectric Power Plant. 
Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a new structure 800 feet 
long, 100 feet wide and 32 feet deep with necessary construction of 
Nose and Center Piers, and widen and deepen Channel across Point 
Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to provide wider anchorage and 
maneuver areas in St. Marys River. 
Deepen to provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 feet over full width to 
downbound and 2-way Channels (including anchorage areas) and over 
Westerly 300-foot width of upbound Middle Neebish Channel, when 
levels of Lakes Superior and Huron are at their respective LWD's. 
Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a part of Project, authorize alteration 
with cost to be apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, 
Jun. 21, 1940. 
Construct a second large lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, 
and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement 
lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal 
at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin 
Locks. 
SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI 
(See Section 63 of Text) 
Entrance Chanel, Piers and Revetments. 
Deepening entrance to 16 feet. 
Deepening Channel in River to 14 feet. 
SAXON HARBOR, WI (See Section 64 of Text) 
Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an 
inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek 
to Parkers Creek by 3 short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. 
H.Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. 
(Plan 3). 
H. Doc. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. 
District Engineer Report, Oct. 
29, 1920. 
H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess., 
and 339, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. 
S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. t 
None. 
H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th 
Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). 
H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., 1st Sess.; 
Annual Report, 1896, Vol. 2, Pt. 5, 
p. 2739. 
Annual Report, 1907, p. 6416. 
H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. 
River and Harbors Act, H. Doc. 169, 
85th Cong., 1st Sess.,' Annual Report 
for 1965, p. 1025. 
21-87

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Oct. 28, 1993 
Aug. 11, 1888 
Mar. 3, 1905 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Oct. 31, 1992 
Mar. 3, 1873 
Jul. 13, 1892 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Aug. 5, 1886 
Aug. 5, 1886 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Nov. 7, 1945 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Mar. 3, 1871 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Aug. 30, 1935 * 
SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI (See Section 65 of Text) 
North breakwater. 
Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and 
elimination of proposed south breakwaters. 
Present project dimensions of channel. 
Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and 
deepen river channel from present project limit to north side of 
Jefferson Avenue. 
SILVER BAY HARBOR, MN (See Section 66 Text) 
Provides for a Harbor of Refuge for small craft. 
Provided Federal funds for the project. 
SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 67 of Text) 
Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge. 12 
Present dimensions of Piers and for a Turning Basin. 
Present project dimensions of Channel and Turning Basin. 
Turning Basin deauthorized. 
STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI 
(See Section 68 of Text) 
Breakwaters.' 2 
Acquision of the canal. 
Canal revetments and consolidation of canal and harbor works. 
Present project dimensions of channels and elimination of turning 
basin immediately west of revetted canal. 
Turning basin between city and Bushman wharves. 
TWO HARBORS, MN (See Section 69 of Text) 
Breakwater and dredging. 
Construction of two breakwater piers. 
Shore connection to east breakwater and dredging maneuvering area. 
Construct new east breakwater and enlargement of maneuvering basin. 
Deepen harbor project depths from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, 
respectively. 
TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI (See Section 70 of Text) 
South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north 
revetment.'2 
Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. 
Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. 
H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.' 
H. Doe. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 
1994 Appropriations Act for Energy 
and Water Development. 
No Prior Survey or Estimate. 
H. Doc. 119, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 9, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. t and 
Unpublished review Report of Chief 
of Engineers, dated Dec. 21, 1934. 
Public Law 102-580 (Section 116 of 
WRDA of 1992). 
H. Ex. Doe. 34, 42d Cong., 2d Sess.; 
Annual Report, 1872, p. 171. 
H. Ex. Doe. 106, 49th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 117, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 9, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 421, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Ex. Doc. 94, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Annual Report, 1887, p. 1952. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 17, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 805, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doe. 146, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 (as 
modified by Chief of Engineers, 
Feb. 27, 1897). 
H. Doc. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., 
Modification of Plan A. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 25, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. 
21-88 
Acts

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Mar. 2, 1867 
Mar. 3, 1873 
Jul. 5, 1884 
Jul. 13, 1892 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Jul. 24, 1946 
Nov. 5, 1990 
Oct. 30, 1990 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Aug. 17, 1991 
Oct. 8, 1992 
Aug. 18, 1941 
Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in 
East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22nd Street Bridge. 
WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 71 of Text) 
New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. 
New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. 
New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. 
New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. 
Present project depth of Channel. 
CLINTON RIVER SPILLWAY, MI (See Section 80 of Text) 
Construction of a cutoff canal with control weirs. 
Completed project review due to significantly changed physical 
conditions. 
FORT WAYNE METRO AREA, IN (See Section 81 of Text) 
Provides 100-year level of flood protection to part of 
central area of city of Fort Wayne, IN. 
SAGINAW RIVER, MI, FLOOD CONTROL 
(See Section 82 of Text) 
Flood control improvements to Saginaw River and its tributaries 
including Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. 
One-time O&M repairs at Flint Unit to restore project to original 
dimensions. 
Provides funding for continuing O&M repairs at Flint Unit. 
SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 83 of Text) 
Enlarging present Channel of Sebewaing River, altering Railroad and 
Highway Bridges, removal of Dike. 
H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 
Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. 
Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. 
Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. 
No Prior Survey or Estimate.s 
H. Doc. 694, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
Section 216 Reconnaissance Report, 
September 1991. 
Public Law 101-640 (Section 101 of 
WRDA of 1990) 
H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
Energy and Water Development 
Appropriation Act of 1992, 
(P.L. 102-104). 
Energy and Water Resources 
Appropriation Act of 1993, 
H.R. 5373, (P.L. 102-377). 
H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
'Contains latest published map. 
'Including Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized 
May 28, 1935. 
'Included in Public Works Administration Program September 
6, 1933. 
'This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 
12, Public Law 93-251. 
'Administrative Act, Section 4. 
'Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 
7Public Law 388, 87th Congress. 
'This portion inactive. 
'Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 
'Transfer completed June 1962. 
"Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. 
nCompleted under previous project. 
slIncluded in Public Works Administration Program January 
3, 1934. 
'Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging 
Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street Bridge to North 
Humboldt Avenue Bridge). 
"Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. 
Riprapping of protecting dikes portion of project is inactive. 
2'War Depaitment Appropriations Act. 
VUncompleted portion deauthorized December 31, 1989, under 
Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. 
nContains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and 
Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 
24Except for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of 
mouth of old channel, work authorized in this Act is considered 
inactive. 
This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 
12, Public Law 93-251. 
26Completed under previous projects. Public Law 130, 75th 
Cong., 1st Seas. 
21-89

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
"Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, 
widcning inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and 
closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. 
$SLatest published map is in Annual Report, 1914, p. 2974. 
6Latest published map in Annual Report, 1914, p. 2914. 
"7Supcrseded by Act of October 23, 1962. 
"Work recommended in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Deauthorized in 1977. 
2 his modification deauthorized December 31, 1989, under 
Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. 
"Latest published map is in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 
31Latest published map is in H. Doc. 2053, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 
21-90

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
Cost to Sep. 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation & 
Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance 
Alpena Harbor, MI Completed 1994 337,3941 1,060,277 
Ausable Harbor, MI Completed 1994 209,7762 2,829,592 
Bayfield Harbor, WI Completed 1979 183,855 142,492 
Bell River, MI Completed 1980 24,301 130,552 
Beaver Bay, MN Active 1982 293,000 2,818 
Black River (Icona Co), MI Inactive 1907 0 878 
Channels in Straits of 
Mackinac, MI Completed 1991 2,832,629 237,339 
Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, MI Completed 1959 125,629 13,528 
Cross Village, MI Active 1983 364,000 0 
DeTour Harbor, MI Conpleted 1989 2,559,346 159,899 
Eagle Harbor, MI Completed 1990 205,164' 99,233 
Graus Reef Passage, MI Completed 1970 190,521 826,431 
Grand Marais Harbor, MI Completed 1994 1,055,871 2,589,470 
Knife River Harbor, MN Active 1986 412,945 298,276 
LaPointe Harbor, MI Completed 1994 139,874 149,516 
Lea Cheneaux Island Channels, MI Completed 1980 399,478 340,803 
Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, MI Completed 1966 332;832 105,634 
Lutsen Harbor, MN Active 1982 357,000 0 
Mackinac Island Harbor, MI Completed 1989 334,089 1,816,565 
Mackinaw City Harbor, MI Completed 1986 136,286' 91,939 
Manistique Harbor, MI Completed 1994 1,299,355 2,267,955 
Northport Harbor, WI Inactive -- 0 0 
Pctoskey Harbor, MI Completed 1986 123,839 569,688 
Pine River, MI Completed 1980 13,649 95,517 
St. James, Beaver Island, MI Completed 1957 49,1716 120,338 
St. Joseph River, MI Completed 1975 54,555 19,185 
Scbewaing River, MI Completed 1994 35,5737 3,543,700 
Tawas Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1994 2,110,745 63,033 
Washington Island, WI Completed 1950 62,838 93,645 
Whitefish Point Harbor, MI Completed 1991 771,639 420,955 
'Includes $18,889 for previous projects. 
2Includes $114,786 for previous projects. 
'Excludes $27,800 for previous projects. 
'Excludes $210,500 Contributed Funds. 
'Includes $3,955 for previous projects. 
'Excludes $7,500 Contributed Funds. 
7Includes $15,000 for previous projects. 
21-91

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Cost to Sep. 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation & 
Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance 
Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) MI' ' Deferred 1975 4,471,235 - 
Kawkawlin River, MI Completed 1991 469,663' 
Paw Paw Lake, MI Completed 1989 3,589,000 - 
Upper River Rouge, MI' Inactive 1968 7,935 - 
River Rouge, MI Completed 1981 31,960,332 - 
'Includes $108,335 Contributed Funds. sIncludes $113,963 Contributed Funds. 
'Uncompleted portion deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with 'Planning indefinitely suspended due to lack of 
Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (PL 99-662). local cooperation. 
TABLE 21-F MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER 
ST. MARYS RIVER, MI: EXISTING PROJECT 
(SEE SECTION 62 OF TEXT) 
Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe 
Miles Above Mouth 47 47 47 47 
Clear Width of Chamber Feet 80 80 80 110 
Length Between Gate Quoins Feet 1,350 1,350 800 1,200 
Lifts Feet 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 
Depth Over Upper Breast Wails' Pest 24.3 24.3 31 32 
Depth Over Lower Braseat Walls' Feet 23.1 23.1 31 32 
Foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock 
Type of Coasstuction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete 
Estimated Cost $6,200,0002 $3,275,000' $12,909,440 $39,000,000 
Actual Cost $2,200,000s $1,750,000' $12,718806 ' ' $34,813,066 
Completed (Open to Commerce) Oct. 21, 1914 Sep. 18, 1919 Jul. 11, 1943 Jun. 26, 1969 
Emergency Dam for South Canal North Canal 
Miles Above Mouth 47 47 
Estimated Cost -' $300,000 
Type St:e1. ecessed 
Cost Completed -' $169,224s 
Year Completed 143 1922 (Modified 1963) 
'At low water d,,,atu m aven a 5785 l El A00.6 dcsa...e. I E.I . . .................... . .. 
=Includes cost of North Canal. 
'Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches 
to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 
'Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, 
$1,653,378. 
'Excludes cost of North Canal, $2,572,611. 
Nte: Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls. 
rxcwoes cil or canal excavtiuonr provide necessary approaches to lock, 
canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 
7Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. 
=Including engineering office, and inspection. 
'Not separate from cost of locks. 
21-92 
el. w Inl v s n. ./o"Q. OGIVowW. .

TABLE 21-G 
DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
Project 
Berrien County, MI 
(St. Joseph Shore) beach erosion 
control (1958 Flood Control Act) 
Black River Harbor, Alcona County, 
MI (Authorized Dec. 17, 1979, 
under Section 201 of the 1965 
Flood Control Act) 
Black River Harbor, MI 
(Aug. 30, 1936 R&H Act) 
Detroit River, Trenton Chal., MI 
(May 17, 1950 R&H Act) 
Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI 
(Uncompleted portion) 
(Aug. 13, 1968 R&H Act) 
Duluth-Superior Inner Harbor, 
MN and WI (Jul. 14, 1960 R&H Act) 
Forestville Harbor, MI (1968 R&H Act) 
Grand Haven Harbor, MI 
(Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) 
Grand River at Grandville, MI 
(Oct. 27, 1965 Flood Control Act) 
Great Lakes Connecting Channels, MI' 
(Uncompleted portion) 
(R&H Acts of 1946 and 1956) 
Harbors of Washington Island, WI 
(R&H Act of 1937) 
Holland Harbor Entrance Channel, MI 
(Uncompleted portion) 
(Sep. 3, 1954 R&H Act) 
Kalamazoo River, Battle Creek, MI 
(Uncompleted portion) 
(1954 Flood Control Act) 
Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo, MI 
(Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) 
Kenosha Harbor, WI 
(Uncompleted portion) 
(Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) 
Kewaunee River, WI 
(1960 R&H Aqt) 
Lansing (Grand River), MI 
(Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual 
Report For 
1963 
1971 
1976 
1976 
1976 
1990 
1969 
1976 
1966 
1990 
1950 
1962 
1975 
1975 
1990 
1976 
1971 
21-93 
.. 
Contributed 
Funds 
Expended 
0
0
0
0 
Date 
Deauthorized 
Nov 1986 
Dec 1989 
Nov 1977 
Aug 1977 
Dec 1989 
Dec 1989 
Nov 1986 
Nov 1977 
Nov 1977 
Dec 1989 
Dec 1989 
Dec 1989 
Dec 1989 
Dec 1989 
Dec 1989 
Aug 1977 
Jun 1981 
. . 
Federal 
Funds 
Expended 
0
0
0
0 
159,300,000 
14,562,100 
0
0
0 
93,993,349 
62,838 
0 
6,656,668 
416,822 
552,000 
0
7,000 
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 
108,332 
0
43,000 
0
0

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Date Funds Funds 
Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Lower Fox River, WI 1990 Dec 1989 3,753,334 0 
(Uncompleted portion) 
(Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act) 
Manitowoc Harbor, WI 990 Dec 1989 0 0 
(Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) 
Milwaukee Outer Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 6,937,804 478,000 
(Uncompleted portion) 
(R&H Act of 1935) 
Northport Harbor, WI -Dec 1989 132,000 0 
(Authorized in 1972 under Section 201 
of the 1965 Flood Control Act) 
Ontonagon Harbor, MI 1990 Dec 1989 27,482 0 
(R&H Act of 1962) 
Pentwater Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 
(Jul. 13, 1892 R&H Act) 
Racine Harbor, WI 1963 May 1986 9,441,554 0 
(Mar. 2, 1907; Aug. 26, 1937; and 
Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Acts, and 
Section 107 of the 1960 R&H Act) 
r 
Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI 1983 Nov 1986 3,823,000 0 
(1970 Flood Control Act) 
Rogers City Harbor, MI 1926 Aug 1977 5,892 0 
(Jun. 25, 1910 R&H Act) 
Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 22,000 0 
(Oct 23, 1962 R&H Act) 
Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 12,000 0 
(Jul. 3, 1958 R&H Act) 
Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 
(Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) 
St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 
(Jul. 3, 1930 R&H Act) 
South Milwaukee Harbor, WI 1906 Aug 1977 0 0 
(1836 Flood Control Act) 
St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard 1977 Oct 1978 0 0 
Gates), MI (Mar. 7, 1942 R&H Act) 
Two Rivers Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 147,463 0 
(Uncompleted portion) 
(Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) 
21-94 
'Includes Detroit and St. Clair Rivers.

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-H FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT 
Length Miles Upbound Project 
of from or Down- Project Project Datum Planes Year 
Channel River bound Width Depth IGLD 1985 Comn- 
Name of Channel (Feet) Mouth Vessels (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) plete 
DETROIT RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 16 OF TEXT) 
Channel north of Belle Isle' 
Channel at head of Detroit River 
Misc. shoals and obstructions 
Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel 
Fighting Island Channel 
Ballards Reef Channel north of 
junction with Livingstone Channel 
Livingstone Channel Upper 
Livingstone Channel Lower: 
CS 260+00 to 368+87 
CS 368+87 to 492+00 
East Outer Channel 
Misc. shoals and obstructions, 
Detroit River to Pelee Passage 
Pelec Passage Shoal 
Amherstberg Channel: 
Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel 
Middle Section 
Lower Section, Hackett Range 
West Outer Channel 
Trenton Channel: 
Wyandotte Reach 
Trenton Channel (Upper) 
Trenton Reach (Lower) 
Grosse lie Shoal 
s 
38,800 
44,500 
30 
32 
25 
Both 200 
Both 800 
Both - 
24,800 17 Both 800 
12,200 12 Both 600 
26,000 10 Down 450 
10,887 
12,313 
42,000 
i 5
-. 
Down 
Both 
Both 
Both 
- - Both 
6,500 
12,000 
24,000 
21,000 
31,500 
5,100 
600 
600 
10 
17 
14 
Up 
Up 
Up 
Down 
Local 
Local 
Local 
Local 
450-800 
800-1,200 
1,200 
.-
600 
600 
600 
800 
300 
300 
250-300 
ST. CLRIR RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 60 OF TEXT) 
Channel at foot of Lake Huron 
Channel north of Blue Water Bridge 
Port Huron to Stag Island: 
Widening at Upper and Lower 
Ends of Stag Island 
St. Clair to Russell Island 
Russell Island to Southeast Bend 
Southeast Bend: 
CS 324+00 to 250+00 
Cutoff Channel 
North Channel Outlet 
26,500 44 
4,100 39 
38,000 
37,600 
77,000 
20,600 
7,400 
30,300 
8,000 
38 
31 
24 
11 
5 
'This is a side channel. 
?Extends from deep water near Windmill Point to a point 
opposite Fairview Slip, about 3,000 feet. 
'Project depth 29.5 feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 feet 
over other than Rock Shoals. 
'Project depth 21 feet in easterly 300-foot width of 
channel and 27.5 feet in westerly 300-foot width. 
5Project depth 21 feet in easterly 300-foot width of 
channel and 28.5 feet in westerly 300-foot width. 
'Project complete except for work authorized by 
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1950. 
21-95 
21.0 
28.5 
28.5 
28.5 
28.5 
27.7 
29.0 
29.0 
28.5 
28.5-29.5' 
29.5 
27.5 
21-27.5' 
21-28.5 s 
22.0 
27.0 
28.0 
28.0 
20.0 
571.9 
572.1-571.5 
571.5-570.9 
570.4 
570.4 
570.4-569.2 
569.2 
569.2 
569.2 
569.2 
569.2 
570.4-570.1 
570.1-569.5 
569.5-569.2 
569.2 
570.3-570.2 
570.2-569.4 
570.4 
1964 
1964 
1964 
1962 
1964 
1964 
1961 
1961 
1964 
1964 
1960 
1960 
1960 
1929 
19646 
1964 
1941 
1904 
Both 800 
Both 800 
Both 
Both 
Both 
Both 
Both 
Both 
Small 
Craft 
30.0 
30.0 
27.4 
27.3 
27.3 
27.2 
27.1 
27.1 
10.0 
1,000-1,400 
900-1,000 
1,000 
700-1,000 
700 
700 
100 
577.5-577.1 
577.1-576.5 
577.1-575.3 
575.3-574.3 
574.3-572.6 
572.6-572.3 
572.3-572.2 
572.2 
572.2 
1961 
1962 
1961 
1962 
1962 
1962 
1962 
1962

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 21-I FOX RIVER, WI: LOCKS AND DAMS 
(SEE SECTION 18 OF TEXT) 
Depth at 
Normal Pool 
Miles Avail- Lower 
from Dis- Clear able Breast Miter 
Green Nearest tance Width Lemgth Lift Wall' Sil Character of Kind of Type of 
Name of Lock and Dam Bay Town (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction 
DePere lock2 7.1 DePere - 36.0 146.0 8.9 10.3 12.0 Rock - Concrete 
DePere dam2 7.2 DePere - - - - - - Rock Fixeds Concrete 
Little Kaukauna lock? 13.0 DePere 6 36.0 146.0 7.2 8.0 9.5 Clay - Concrete 
Little Kaukauna dam' 13.1 DePere 6 - - - - - Clay and gravel Fixeds" Piers and concrete 
Rapide Croche lock? 19.2 Wrightstown 2 36.0 146.0 8.3 8.8 9.3 Rock - Concrete 
Rapide Croche dam' 19.3 Wrightstown 2 - - - - - Rock Fixeds" Concrete 
Kaukauna fifth lock? 22.8 Kaukauna - 35.6 144.0 9.1 6.7 9.3 Rock - Composite 
Kaukauna fourth lock? 23.1 Kaukauna - 36.6 144.1 10.2 6.9 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 
Kaukauna third lock? 23.3 Kaukauna - 30.6 144.0 10.2 6.9 6.3 Rock - Stone masonry 
Kaukauna second lock? 23.4 Kaukauna - 35.0 144.0 9.6 6.0 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 
Kaukauna first lock? 23.6 Kaukauna - 35.1 144.4 11.0 6.9 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 
Kaukauna dam' 24.0 Kaukauna - - - - - - Rock Fixeds Concrete 
Kaukauna guard lock 24.0 Kaukauna - 40.0 -- - 9.4 - Rock - Stone masonry 
Little Chute combined lock: 
Lower 24.4 Little Chute 1 35.4 146.5 10.9 6.0 8.6 Rock - Stone masonry 
Upper 25.4 Little Chute 1 36.3 144.1 10.6 7.6 6.0 Hardpan - Stone masonry 
Little Chute second lock 26.4 Little Chute - 35.0 144.2 13.8 8.0 6.1 Rock - Stone masonry 
Luttle Chute first (guard) lock' 26.5 Little Chute - 35.4 - - 6.6 - Rock - Stone masonry 
Little Chute dam' 26.6 Little Chute - - -- - - Rock Fixeds" Concrete 
Cedars lock 27.3 Little Chute 1 35.0 144.0 9.8 6.8 7.3 Rock - Stone masonry 
Cedars dam s 27.4 Little Chute 1 - - - - - Rock Fixeds" Concrete 
Appleton fourth lock 30.7 Appelton 1 35.0 144.0 7.6 8.1 7.9 Rock - Stone masonry 
Appleton lower dam 30.9 Appleton 1 - - - - - Rock Fixeds Concrete 
Appleton third lock 31.3 Appleton - 35.0 144.0 8.7 6.0 8.6 Rock - Stone masonry 
Appleton second lock= 31.6 Appleton - 35.1 144.6 9.6 6.9 6.0 Clay - Stone masonry 
Appelton first lock? 31.9 Appleton - 35.0 144.7 10.0 6.6 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 
Appleton upper dam 32.2 Appleton - - - - - - Rock Fixeds Concrete 
Menasha lock? 37.0 Menasha - 35.4 144.0 8.5 7.2 8.0 Clay - Composite 
Menasha dam, 37.8 Menasha - - - - - - Hardpan Fixeds Concrete 
Year 
Com- Actual 
plete Cost 
1936 $229,308 
1929 209,536 
1938 362,427 
1926 179,398 
1934 228,738 
1930 118,975 
1898 13,310' 
1879 37,536 
1879 39,948 
1903 24,313 
1883 38,704 
1931 123,763 
1891 12,630 
1879 102,304 
1879 - 
1881 48,555 
1904 7,817 s 
1932 82,554 
1888 34,972 
1933 84,973 
1907 40,893 
1934 73,903 
1900 32,238 
1901 22,940 
1884 36,004 
1940 151,558 
1899 19,326s 
1937 84,686 
'Depth shown is on breast wall, which is controlling depth for 
upper pool. 
'Original structure built prior to assumption of control by 
United States on Sep. 18, 1872. 
'Provided with sluices. 
'Flash boards used. 
sPartially rebuilt. 
21-96

DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 
TABLE 21-J RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS 
ALPENA HARBOR, MI AUGUST 1995 
BELLE RIVER, MI 
CEDARS RIVER, MI 
EAGLE HARBOR, MI 
KNIFE RIVER, MN 
LES CHENEAUX HARBOR, MI 
MACKINAW CITY HARBOR, MI 
MACKINAW ISLAND HARBOR, MI 
PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI 
PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI 
SEBEWAING RIVER, MI 
ST. JAMES HARBOR, MI 
WASHINGTON ISLAND, WI 
WHITEFISH POINTE HARBOR MI 
SEPTEMBER 1995 
SEPTEMBER 1995 
JULY 1995 
JUNE 1995 
JUNE 1995 
JULY 1995 
NOVEMBER 1994 
JUNE 1995 
MAY 1995 
SEPTEMBER 1995 
AUGUST 1995 
JUNE 1995 
JULY 1995 
21-97 
Name of Project Date Survey Conducted

DETROIT DISTRICT'S FY 1995 
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEY EXPENDITURES 
Algoma Harbor, WI 
Alpena Harbor, MI 
Ashland Harbor, WI 
Bayfield Harbor, WI 
Bay Port Harbor, MI 
Belle River, MI 
Big Suamico Harbor, WI 
Black River UP, MI 
Caseville Harbor, MI 
Cedar River, MI 
Charlevoix, MI 
Cheboygan Harbor, MI 
Detour Harbor, MI 
Eagle Harbor, MI 
Grand Marais Harbor, MI 
Grand Marais Harbor, MN 
Grand Traverse Harbor, MI . 
Grays Reef Passage, MI 
Grellickville Harbor, MI 
Hammond Bay Harbor, MI 
Harbor Beach, MI 
Harrisville Harbor, MI 
Kenosha Harbor, WI 
Knife River, MN. 
La Pointe Harbor, WI 
Lac La Belle Harbor, MI 
Leland Harbor, MI 
Les Cheneaux Harbor, MI 
Lexington Harbor, MI 
Mackinaw City, MI 
Mackinac Island, MI 
Mackinaw City Harbor, MI 
Manisitque Harbor, MI 
Marquette Harbor, MI 
Menominee Harbor, MI 
Oconto Harbor, WI. 
Pensaukee Harbor, WI 
Pine River, MI. 
Pointe Lookout, MI 
Port Austin Harbor, MI 
Port Sanilac Harbor, MI 
Port Wing, MN. 
Portage Lake Harbor, MI 
Saxon Harbor, WI. 
Sebewaing River, MI 
St. James Harbor, MI 
Straits of Mackinac, MI 
Tawas Bay Harbor, MI 
Two Harbors Harbor, MN 
Washington Island Harbor, WI. 
White Lake Harbor, MI 
Whitefish Pointe Harbor, MI . 
TOTAL PCS EXPENDITURES 
"
"
" 
" 
"
"
" 
"
"
" 
" 
"
" 
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" 
"
" 
21-98 
"
"
" 
" 
" 
CDP49. 
CDPO2. 
CDP75. 
CDP55. 
CDPO4. 
CDPO6. 
CDP56. 
CDP72. 
CDP10. 
CDP71. 
CDP80. 
CDP12. 
CDP73. 
CDP18. 
CDP45. 
CDP32. 
CDP77. 
CDP14. 
CDP40. 
CDP15. 
CDP16. 
CDP17. 
CDP78. 
CDP59. 
CDP61. 
CDP23. 
CDP19. 
CDP20. 
CDP21. 
CDP24. 
CDP22. 
CDP25. 
CDP26. 
CDP46. 
CDP62. 
CDP64. 
CDP66. 
CDP28. 
CDP29. 
CDP30. 
CDP33. 
CDP52. 
CDP27. 
CDP63. 
CDP36. 
CDP34. 
CDP38. 
CDP41. 
CDP65. 
CDP70. 
CDP43. 
CDP42. 
. . 
" ,,o" 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
.. .. 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. . 
. .� 
. . 
. . 
.". 
. ." 
"
" 
"
"
"
"
" 
"
" 
"
"
"
"
"
" 
"
"
"
"
"
" 
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" 
" 
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" 
02-Mar-96 
$1,526.26 
$33,255.40 
$5,431.27 
$19,182.33 
$7,975.00 
$14,006.43 
$6,286.56 
$1,012.48 
$2,665.38 
$2,365.47 
$42,051.01 
$10,047.40 
$10,900.87 
$2,854.01 
$3,159.36 
$171.57 
$18,354.27 
$2,020.75 
$900.98 
$2,506.58 
$4,073.08 
$14,225.15 
$586.76 
$3,147.25 
$17,218.75 
$1,954.94 
$973.90 
$4,451.12 
$7,900.00 
$2,071.35 
$621.00 
$1,976.67 
$10,972.15 
$4,141.25 
$39,459.27 
$326.10 
$5,443.99 
$16,175.00 
$984.36 
$22,791.94 
$21,811.47 
$775.45 
$4,902.59 
$4,729.73 
$33,654.29 
$9,978.63 
$2,000.00 
$437.34 
$1,786.89 
$15,853.28 
$332.79 
$9,946.70 
$452,376.57

CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT *
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT 
The district comprises Cook, Mc Henry, Lake, Kane, Du Page, and Will Counties in Illinois, and Lake and Porter 
Counties in Indiana, and a portion of La Porte County along Lake Michigan in Indiana. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation 
1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 
2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 
3. Burns Waterway Harbor (Maj. Rehab), IN 
4. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 
5. Chicago Harbor, IL 
6. Chicago River, IL 
7. Indiana Harbor, IN 
8. Lake Michigan Diversion 
9. Michigan City Harbor, IN 
10. Waukegan Harbor, IL 
11. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 
12. National Emergency Preparedness 
Alterations of Bridges 
13. Other Authorized Bridge Alterations 
Beach Erosion Control 
14. Casino Beach, IL 
15. Chicago Shoreline, IL 
16. Illinois Beach State Park, IL 
17. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Bank 
Protection, Beverly Shores, IN 
18. Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN 
19. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects 
20. Beach Erosion Control Under 
Special Authorization 
Page 
22-2 
22-2 
22-3 
22-3 
22-3 
22-4 
22-5 
22-5 
22-5 
22-6 
22-6 
22-6 
Flood Control 
21. Chicago River, IL 
(North Branch) 
22. Kankakee River Ice Management, IL 
23. Lake George, Hobart, IN 
24. Little Calumet River, IN 
25. Little Calumet River Basin, 
Cady Marsh Ditch, IN 
26. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL 
27. North Branch, Chicago River, IL 
28. O'Hare Reservoir, IL 
29. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 
30. Flood Control Work Under Special 
Authorization 
22-6 General Investigations 
31. Surveys 
32. Collection and Study of Basic Data 
22-6 
22-7 
22-7 
22-8 
22-8 
22-8 
22-8 
Title 
Cost and Financial Statement 
Authorizing Legislation 
Existing Projects 
Other Authorized Bridge Alterations 
Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects 
Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 
Deauthorized Projects 
TABLES
Table 
Numbers 
22-A 
22-B 
22-C 
22-D 
22-E 
22-F 
22-G 
Pages 
22-14 Thru 17 
22-18 Thru 21 
22-22 
22-23 
22-23 
22-23 
22-24 
22-1 
Page 
22-8 
22-9 
22-9 
22-9 
22-10 
22-10 
22-11 
22-12 
22-12 
22-12 
22-13 
22-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Navigation 
1. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN 
Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southern 
shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 28 
miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) 
Existing Project. Provides for (a) a 
rubblemound north breakwater 4,630 feet long 
and a rubblemound breakwater west arm 1,200 
feet long, for a total breakwater length of 5,830 
feet; (b) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 
400 feet wide; (c) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; 
(d) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet 
wide; and (e) a west harbor arm 27 feet deep 
and 620 feet wide. The project was authorized 
by the River and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965 
(Public Law 89-298; House Document Number 
160, 88th Congress, 1st Session). The authorizing 
act also provided the Secretary of the Army 
with the authority to reimburse the State of 
Indiana for expenditure of funds used to 
construct such portions of the project as approved 
by the Chief of Engineers and constructed 
under supervision of the Chief of Engineers (See 
table 22-C). 
Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal Facilities. Eleven berths are available 
at the facilities owned and administered by 
the Indiana Port Commission. One berth, committed 
to grain, is located on the outer harbor. 
Four berths on the East Harbor Arm are 
dedicated to handling dry and liquid bulk 
commodities. The East Harbor Arm also includes 
a small-boat harbor designed to accommodate 
working tugs for vessel assistance and barge 
movement. On the West Arm there are six 
berths. Although one berth is available for dry 
bulk cargoes, these berths are primarily used for 
the shipment and receipt of general cargo. 
Additionally, the Indiana Port Commission, 
through a lease, administers the west side of the 
West Harbor Arm for barge fleeting. The 
remaining available harbor berthing on the east 
side of the East Harbor Arm is privately owned. 
Operations and Results During Period. 
Maintenance: Surveys and studies were performed 
at a cost of $103,322. Major Rehabilitation 
Reports were continued at a cost of $1,676. 
Engineering and design costs associated with the 
West leg of the north breakwater were $89,221 and 
$19,976 respectively. Stones were placed at a cost 
of $728,272. Contract administration cost was 
$57,370. Engineering and design costs associated 
with dredging the Inner Harbor were $63,187. Construction 
cost was $329,000 and contract administration 
cost was $19,559. Project administration and 
real estate costs were $82,488 and $12,976, respectively. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing 
project is complete. Total costs to September 30, 
1995 were $22,643,716 of which $13,599,900 was 
for new work ($13,584,000 federal and $15,900 nonfederal) 
and $9,043,816 for maintenance. 
2. BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN 
Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southeast 
shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, at the 
mouth of the Burns Waterway, approximately 35 
miles southeast of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical 
Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) 
Previous Projects. None 
Existing Project. Provides for (a) a rubblemound 
west breakwater 1,003 feet long; (b) a rubblemound 
north breakwater 678 feet long; and (c) channel 
improvements of 5,200 linear feet with 145,000 cubic 
yards of dredged material used for beach nourishment 
(See table 22-C). 
Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas 
located along Burns Waterway and Burns Ditch. 
The commodities handled at this harbor are fresh 
fish caught as a result of charter boat fishing. 
Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: 
Beach monitoring analysis and surveys were 
performed by hired labor at a cost of $12,605. Stones 
were purchased for repair of the North breakwater 
at a cost of $47,648. Engineering and design costs 
were $10,931. Stones were placed by other Corps of 
Engineers at a cost of $800. Project management 
and real estate costs were $9,550 and $260, respectively. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of 
the existing project to September 30, 1995 were 
$4,900,685 of which $3,770,558 was for new work 
($2,000,000 federal and $1,770,558 non-federal), and 
$1,130,127 for maintenance. 
22-2

CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT 
3. BURNS WATERWAY HABOR 
(MAJOR REHAB), IN 
Location. The project is located in northwestern 
Indiana on the southern shore of Lake 
Michigan in Porter County. 
Existing Project. The rehabilitation project 
consists of constrtucting a segmented reef breakwater 
system, 75 feet lakeward of the northern section 
of the existing rubblemound breakwater. The project 
provides for seven reef segments, one 1,575 feet long 
and six 375 feet long with 25 feet spacing between 
segments. Estimated federal cost (1995) for new 
work is $13,600,000. 
Local Cooperation. None required. 
Operations and Results During the Period. 
New Work: construction contract was initiated at a 
cost of $1,748,327. Engineering and design costs 
were $164,786. Construction management costs 
were $63,580 and $16,130 was for Programs and 
Project Management. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Initiated 
construction in May 1995. The total cost of the 
existing project to September 30, 1995 was 
$1,992,823. 
4. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, 
IL AND IN 
Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest 
shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, 15 
miles south of Chicago Harbor, within the corporate 
limits of the City of Chicago, except for breakwaters, 
and approach channel and an anchorage area 
which are in Illinois and Indiana. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) 
Previous Projects. For details see page 1400 of 
Annual Report for 1962. 
Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled 
timber crib breakwater 6,714 feet long; (b) a stonefilled 
double-row steel sheet pile detached breakwater 
5,007 feet long; (c) an approach channel 29 feet 
deep and 3,200 feet wide; (d) an outer harbor 
anchorage area 28 feet deep and 3,000 feet wide; (e) 
an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 230 to 290 feet 
wide; (f) a channel in the Calumet River 27 feet 
deep and at least 200 feet wide to the north side of 
130th Street; (g) three turning basins designated 
as numbers, 1, 3, and 5; and (h) a channel extending 
into Lake Calumet at a width of about 1,000 feet. 
The project was authorized by the River and Harbor 
Act of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, August 30, 
1935, July 14, 1960, October 23, 1962, and October 
27, 1965 (See table 22-C). 
Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal Facilities. Thirty six docks, wharves, 
and terminals are available. The Illinois International 
Port District owns four wharves, two grain 
elevators, one dock, and one terminal. The United 
States Government owns one stone dock. The most 
important cargoes handled are iron ore and concentrates, 
coal, and lignite. 
Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: 
Garage repairs were performed by contract 
at a cost of $9,819. Sediment surveys and 
studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of 
$11,519, by other Corps of Engineers at a cost of 
$5,699, and by contract at a cost of $560. Water 
quality studies were continued at a cost of $154,781. 
Stones purchased for Reach C breakwater were 
$127,801. The stones were placed by other Corps of 
Engineers at a cost of $159,800. Other costs associated 
with the breakwater were $52,224. Engineering 
and design costs associated with dredging were 
$88,924. The FY 1994 dredging contract was continued 
at a cost of $574,585. Supervision and administration 
costs were $66,354. Maintenance of the 
confined disposal facility was performed by contract 
at a cost of $20,640. The Keno claim was $1,980. 
Project management and real estate costs were 
$145,387 and $4,608 respectively. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing 
project is 100 percent complete pursuant to Section 
100 (b), Public Law 99-662, approved January 1990. 
Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 
1995, were $60,246,256 of which $22,578,567 was 
for new work ($19,541,964 regular funds and 
$3,036,603 public works funds), $31,403,021 regular 
funds for maintenance, $836,667 non-federal 
funds for maintenance, and $5,428,001 regular funds 
for rehabilitation. 
5. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL 
Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest 
shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within 
the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See 
NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, and 
14928.) 
Previous Projects. See page 1396 of Annual 
Report for 1962. 
Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled 
timber crib shore and extension breakwater 2,250 
feet long; (b) a stone-filled timber crib exterior 
breakwater 5,421 feet long; (c) a rubblemound and 
stone-filled concrete caisson southerly extension to 
22-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
the exterior breakwater 4,944 feet long, exclusive 
of a 582 foot entrance gap enclosing an outer basin 
of about 970 acres; (d) a stone-filled timber crib 
north pier 960 feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber 
crib north inner breakwater 4,034 feet long with a 
304-foot shore return and a 754-foot gap; (f) a 
stonefilled timber crib south inner breakwater 2,544 
feet long, enclosing an inner basin of approximately 
224 acres; (g) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep 
and 800 feet wide; (h) a channel and maneuver area 
inside the exterior breakwater and southerly extension 
breakwater 28 feet deep with a maximum width 
of 1,300 feet; and (i) an entrance channel 21 feet 
deep. The project was authorized by the River and 
Harbor Acts of July 11, 1870, June 14, 1880, March 
3, 1899, July 25, 1912, March 2, 1919 and October 
23, 1962 (See table 22-C). 
The Chicago Lock was constructed in 1938 by the 
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater 
Chicago. The deep-draft lock is 600 feet long, 80 
feet wide, and 23 feet deep over the sill and is of 
steel cellular design. Operation and maintenance 
responsibilities in the interest of navigation were 
transferred to the Federal Government pursuant to 
Public Law 98-63 approved July 30, 1983, Section 
107 of the Public 97-88, and Memorandum of Agreement 
between the Department of Army and the 
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater 
Chicago. 
Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal Facilities. There are three docks, two 
for passenger excursion boats and one for cargo. 
The most important cargoes handled are sugar and 
non-metallic minerals. 
Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: 
Sediment surveys and other studies were 
performed by hired labor at a cost of $9,263, and by 
other Corps of Engineers at a cost of $63,719. International 
Research and Development Inc. operated 
the lock from October 1, 1994 through June 1995 at 
a cost of $466,181. The lock was operated by OMNI 
Corp from July 1995 through September 1995 at a 
cost of $176,662. Analyses and reports of a dewatering 
system consisting of lock bulkhead and slots 
were performed by hired labor at a cost of $457,182 
and by contract at a cost of $29,808. Engineering 
and design costs of the lock bulkhead slots were 
$54,536. Construction cost was $45,000. Other 
costs associated with lock operations were $97,674. 
Repairs to the Southerly breakwater were performed 
by hired labor at a cost of $46,034, by other Corps of 
Engineers at a cost of $96,164 and by contract at a 
cost of $32,067. Supervision and administration 
costs were $7,801. Project management and real 
estate costs were $182,752 and $19,101, respectively. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing 
project is complete. Total costs to September 30, 
1995 were $30,873,776 of which $4,788,827 was for 
new work, $24,758,349 was for maintenance and 
$1,326,600 for rehabilitation. 
6. CHICAGO RIVER, IL 
Location. Northeastern Illinois, in Cook County 
within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927 
and 14928.) 
Previous Projects. See page 1394 of Annual 
Report for 1962. 
Existing Project. Provides for (a) a channel 21 
feet deep in the main river from its mouth at Rush 
Street to the junction of the North and South 
Branches (0.7 miles); (b) a channel 21 feet deep in 
the North Branch from the junction to North Avenue 
(2.22 miles); (c) a channel 21 feet deep on the North 
Branch Canal (1.04 miles); (d) a 21-foot deep North 
Branch Turning Basin just south of North Avenue; 
and (e) a channel 9 feet deep in the North Branch 
from North Avenue to Addison Street. The project 
was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 
March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, March 2, 1907, and 
July 24, 1946 (See table 22-C). The portion of 
project authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1946 
is presently being restudied to confirm economic 
feasibility. 
Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for 
completed modifications. River and Harbor Act of 
July 24, 1946, which provided the improvement of 
the channel, is subject to condition that local interests 
furnish assurances that they will hold the United 
States free from damages which may result from 
construction and maintenance of the improvement. 
Requirement has not been complied with. 
Terminal Facilities. Six docks are available. 
The most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel 
and crushed rock. 
Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: 
Sediment surveys and other studies were 
performed by hired labor at a cost of $22,928. Water 
quality activities were performed by hired labor at a 
cost of $71,716, and by other federal agency at a cost 
of $125,000. Program management cost was 
$147,266. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The project is 
complete except for dredging the channel between 
North Avenue and Addison Street as authorized by 
the 1946 River and Harbor Act. Head of navigation 
for deep-draft vessels is North Avenue, 5.97 miles 
from the Michigan Avenue bridge. Total costs of the 
22-4

CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT 
existing project to September 30, 1995 were 
$16,318,448 of which $1,500,565 was for new work 
and $14,817,883 was for maintenance. 
7. INDIANA HARBOR, IN 
Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southwest 
shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 19 
miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) 
Previous Projects. For details see page 1943 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly 
rubblemound breakwater 1,120 feet long; (b) an 
easterly concrete capped caisson breakwater 201 
feet long with a rubblemound extension 2,324 feet 
long; (c) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 
800 feet wide; (d) an anchorage and maneuver basin 
28 feet deep; (e) a main canal entrance channel 27 
feet deep and 280 feet wide; (f) a main canal 22 feet 
deep; (g) a turning basin 22 feet deep; (h) the Forks 
Turning Basin 22 feet deep; (i) the Lake George 
Branch 22 feet deep; and (j) the Calumet River 
Branch 22 feet deep. The project was authorized by 
the River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, March 
2, 1919, March 20, 1922, July 3, 1930, August 30, 
1935, August 28, 1937, and July 14, 1960 (See table 
22-C). 
Local Cooperation. Substantially complied with. 
See FY 1986 Annual Report for full requirements. 
Terminal Facilities. Fifteen docks and wharves 
are available. Six docks handle iron ore and limestone. 
Six docks are for handling petroleum products 
and three docks for handling gypsum, scrap 
metal and steel, and bulk products. However, not 
all docks are presently being used for the shipment 
or receipt of waterborne commodities. 
Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: 
Environmental studies and surveys were 
performed by hired labor at a cost of $190,200. 
Ground water monitoring of the confined disposal 
facility was perfomed by other Corps of Engineers at 
a cost of $32,294 and by contract at a cost of $142,000. 
Program management and real estate costs were 
$12,282 and $1,175, respectively. 
Condition at End of Fiscal year. The existing 
project is complete. Total costs of the existing 
project to September 30, 1995 were $16,606,870 of 
which $4,909,648 was for new work and $11,697,222 
was for maintenance. 
8. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION 
Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest 
shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, 
within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, 
and 14928. ) 
Previous Projects. 
Report for 1988. 
See page 22-3 of Annual 
Operations and Results During Period. 
Maintenance: Studies and preparation of reports 
were performed by hired labor at a cost of $217,780, 
by other federal agency at a cost of $75,894, and by 
contract at a cost of $157,352. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of 
the existing project to September 30, 1995 was 
$2,177,039. 
9. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN 
Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast 
shore of Lake Michigan in La Porte County, 38 
miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA 
Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926. ) 
Previous Projects. See page 1407 of Annual 
Report for 1992. 
Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled 
timber crib detached breakwater 1,304 feet long; (b) 
a pile and steel sheeting west pier 835 feet long; (c) 
a stone-filled timber crib, pile and steel sheeting 
east pier 2,276 feet long; (d) a stone-filled timber 
crib east breakwater 1,000 feet long; (e) an entrance 
channel 18 feet deep and 425 feet wide; (f) a 
turning basin No. 1, 18 feet deep; (g) a channel in 
Trail Creek 18 feet deep; (h) a turning basin No. 2, 
18 feet deep (i) an outer basin 12 feet deep in the 
northerly portion and 8 feet deep in the southerly 
portion; and (j) a channel in Trail Creek 6 feet deep 
and 50 feet wide from turning basin No. 2 to the E 
Street bridge. The project was authorized by the 
Rivers and Harbors Acts of March 3, 1899, March 3, 
1905, January 21, 1927, August 30, 1935, and 
Section 107 of July 14, 1960, Rivers and Harbors 
Acts approved on September 30, 1966 (See table 22- 
C).
Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas 
in the lower mile of Trail Creek. The commodity 
handled at this harbor is fresh fish. 
Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: 
Sediment surveys and studies were continued 
by hired labor at a cost of $35,727, by other 
22-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Corps of Engineers at a cost of $19,981, and by 
contract at a cost of $5,393. The East Pier contract 
cost was credited $2,000. Supervision and 
administation costs were $382. Other costs associated 
with the breakwater were $133,436. Engineering 
and design costs for dredging Trail Creek were 
$14,446. Program management and real estate costs 
were $37,198 and $2,152, respectively. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of 
the existing project to September 30, 1995 were 
$14,343,782 of which $1,574,158 was for new work 
($1,543,646 federal and $30,512 non-federal funds), 
$11,095,954 for maintenance, and $1,618,670 for 
rehabilitation and $55,000 contributed. 
10. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL 
Location. Northeastern Illinois on the west 
shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 38 miles 
north of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical 
Chart Numbers 14904 and 14905.) 
Previous Projects. See page 1392 of Annual 
Report for 1962. 
Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly 
stone-filled timber crib breakwater 588 feet long; 
(b) a stone-filled reinforced concrete caisson shore 
connection 270 feet long; (c) a stone-filled doublerow 
steel sheeting shore connection 640 feet long; 
(d) a single-row steel sheeting shore connection 398 
feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber crib north pier 
998 feet long; (f) a single-row steel sheet piling 
north pier 444 feet long; (g) a steel piling revetment 
632 feet long; (h) a stone-filled timber crib pier 
1,399 feet long; (i) a stone-filled double-row pile 
and sheeting south pier 1,712 feet long; (j) an 
entrance channel 22 feet deep and 390 feet wide; (k) 
a channel between the piers 18 feet deep and 200 
feet wide; (1) an inner basin 13 feet deep; and (m) an 
anchorage area in the southwest corner of the inner 
basin 8 feet deep. The project was authorized by 
the River and Harbor Acts of June 3, 1902, July 13, 
1930, and March 2, 1945 (See table 22 -C). 
Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal Facilities. Four docks are available. 
The commodities handled at this harbor are gypsum 
and building cement. 
Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: 
Environmental studies and monitoring 
activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of 
$17,468, by contract at a cost of $22,025, and by 
other Corps of Engineers at a cost of $16,159. Water 
quality costs were $3,487, and real estate costs 
were $2,847. Construction costs associated with 
resurfacing the South Pier were $366,066. Other 
costs associated with the breakwater were $29,407. 
Supervision and administration costs were $44,868. 
Engineering and design costs associated with resurfacing 
the South Pier and dredging the outer harbor 
were $56,249. Construction cost for dredging the 
outer harbor was $46,269. Project management cost 
was $56,944. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing 
project is complete except for the 1970 modification 
which is being restudied. Total costs of existing 
project to September 30, 1995 were $13,353,656 of 
which $823,026 was for new work and $12,530,630 
was for maintenance. 
11. RECONNAISSANCE AND 
CONDITION SURVEYS 
Work on the Illinois and Michigan Canal reconnaissance 
report was performed at a cost of $31,855. 
12. NATIONAL EMERGENCY 
PREPAREDNESS 
Fiscal Year 1995 costs of $115,000 were for: 
Training and Exercises $ 100,502 
Management and Mobilization Planning 14,498 
Alteration of Bridges 
13. OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE 
ALTERATIONS, 
See table 22-D. 
Beach Erosion Control 
14. CASINO BEACH, IL 
Location. Casino Beach is located along the 
Lake Michigan shoreline at Jackson Park in Chicago, 
Illinois. 
Existing Project. The Casino Beach project was 
authorized by Section 501 (a) of the 1986 Water 
Resources Development Act. The project consists of 
rehabilitating 1,800 feet of the Casino jetty by encasing 
the existing timber pile and stone structure 
in steel sheet piling and a concrete cap. The 
estimated cost (1995) for new work is $7,430,000 of 
which $3,650,000 is federal and $3,780,000 is nonfederal. 
Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor is 
the Chicago Park District. The local sponsor is 
required to provide all lands, easements and rightsof-
way; complete all necessary relocations; hold and 
save the United States free from damages due to 
construction or operation of the project; operate and 
22-6

CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT 
maintain the completed project; and make cash contribution 
toward the cost of construction. 
Operations and Results During Period. 
New Work: Construction activities were initiated 
in June 1995 on the base bid plus two options for 800 
feet of the breakwater at a construction cost of 
$2,229,866 of which $1,089.216 was Federal and 
$1,140,650 non-federal. Total of $2,046,703 was 
expended on the construction contract in FY 1995 of 
which $1,220,020 was federal and $826,683 was 
non-federal. Real estate management costs were 
$4,836 ($4,836 federal and $0 non-federal). Engineering 
and design costs were $92,201 (-$190,690 
federal and $282,891 non-federal). Construction 
management costs were $76,366 ($48,352 federal 
and $28,014 non-federal). Program and project 
managment costs were $9,760 ($6,698 federal and 
$3,062 non-federal). 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. 
Preconstruction engineering and design was completed. 
The total cost of the existing project to 
September 30, 1995 was $2,966,798 of which is 
$1,826,148 federal and $1,140,650 non-federal. 
15. CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL 
Location. The project area includes 24 miles of publicly 
owned shoreline along Lake Michigan in Chicago, 
Illinois. 
Existing Project. The Chicago Shoreline project is not 
authorized. The Federally supportable plan consists of 
constructing rubblemound revetments along 16,500 and 
21,500 feet of the shoreline in the Lincoln Park and 
Burnham Park areas, respectively. Other project features 
include: revetments near the Adler Planetarium 
and at Meigs Field; a low concrete floodwall with detachable 
flashboards along Lake Shore Drive in the Oak 
Street Beach area; a breakwater to protect the South 
Purification Plant near 78th Street; and nourishment of 
a short reach of shoreline near Fullerton Avenue and 31st 
Street. The estimated fully funded project cost for this 
plan(1995) is $211,000,000. The local sponsor prefers to 
substitute steel sheet pile step stone revetments for the 
rubblemound revetments in the Lincoln and Burnham 
Park areas. They have agreed to pay the incremental cost 
above the federally supportable plan. The estimated fully 
funded project cost of the locally preferred plan is 
$254,000,0000 (1995). 
Local Cooperation. By letters dated February 2, 
1993 and March 1, 1993, the Chicago Park District and 
the City of Chicago, respectively indicated their willingness 
to be the local project sponsors. The local sponsor is 
required to provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway; 
complete all necessary relocations; hold and save the 
United States free from damages due to construction or 
operation of the project; operate and maintain the completed 
project; and make cash contribution toward the 
cost of construction. 
Operations and Results Durin Period. 
New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design 
activites were continued at a cost of $953,778. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction 
engineering and design is in progress. The total cost of the 
existing project to September 30, 1995 was $1,613,163. 
16. ILLINOIS BEACH 
STATE PARK, IL 
Location. Northeastern Illinois on the west shore 
of Lake Michigan along the 9-mile reach of shoreline 
immediately south of the Illinois-Wisconsin State 
line. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14901 
and 14904.) 
Previous Projects. None. 
Existing Project. Provides for (a) construction 
of 46 rubblemound, offshore breakwaters approximately 
150 feet long and spaced about 300 feet 
apart; (b) initial beach nourishment consisting of 
placement of 100,000 cubic yards of coarse graded 
beach material; and (c) periodic renourishment of 
100,000 cubic yards approximately every five years. 
The project was conditionally authorized in Section 
501 (b) of the 1986 Water Resources Development 
Act subject to a report by the Corps of Engineers and 
approval by the Secretary of the Army. A Feasibility 
Review Conference was held in April 1991. As a 
result, the District Engineer was directed to terminate 
work on this project and to submit a letter 
report to the Congress summarizing the feasibility 
study and the results of the Washington level 
review. Preconstruction engineering and design 
funds in the amount of $10,548 were expended in 
connection with the Feasibility Review Conference. 
Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor 
would be required to provide all lands, easements 
and rights-of-way; accomplish all required relocations; 
hold and save the United States free from 
damages; and provide a cash contribution. 
Operations and Results During Period. Work 
on the feasibility report was resumed in FY 1994 as 
directed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for 
Civil Works in response to a letter from Congressman 
John Porter, 10th Congressional District of 
Illinois, at a cost of $812. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of 
the existing project to September 30, 1995 was 
$11,908. 
22-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
17. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL 
LAKESHORE BANK PROTECTION, 
BEVERLY SHORES, IN 
Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast 
shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, approximately 
35 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. 
(See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 
14926. ) 
Existing Project. Provides for placement 13,000 
feet of stone revetment and periodic repair of riprap 
to maintain the full length of beach front at Beverly 
Shores, Indiana. The current project was authorized 
by Public Law 97-88 and Public Law 98-63. 
Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and Results During Period. 
Maintenance: Topogrpahic survey of the revetment 
was performed by hired labor at a cost of 
$50,867. Project management and real estate costs 
were $6,840 and $617, respectively. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of 
existing project to September 30, 1995 were 
$1,226,553 of which $660,000 was for new work and 
$566,553 was for maintenance. 
18. INDIANA SHORELINE 
EROSION, IN 
Location. On the south end of Lake Michigan 
along a two mile reach of shore west of Michigan 
City Harbor, Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 
Numbers 14095 and 14926.) 
Existing Project. The project consists of beach 
nourishment along approximately two miles of beach 
between Michigan City Harbor and Beverly Shores, 
Indiana, requiring an initial placement of 264,500 
cubic yards of sand. Periodic replenishment of 
about 264,500 cubic yards of sand at five year intervals 
would be required throughout the life of the 
project. The project was authorized for construction 
by Section 501 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986. Estimated federal cost (1994) 
for new work is $196,000,000, including future beach 
nourishments. 
Local Cooperation. None required. 
Operations and Results During Period. 
New Work: Advance engineering and design was 
completed at a cost of $56,672. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. 
Preconstruction planning and engineering was initiated 
in fiscal year 1984. Total cost of the existing 
project to September 30, 1995 is $423,514. 
19. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH 
EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
See table 22-E. 
20. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 
UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 
103 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1962, as 
amended. None. 
Flood Control 
21. CHICAGO RIVER, IL 
(NORTH BRANCH) 
Location. Northern Illinois, in Cook and Lake 
Counties. 
Existing Project. Provides for clearing the 
channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River of 
fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects 
which contribute to the flooding, unsightliness, and 
pollution of the river. The project extends from 
Wolf Point in Chicago, Illinois, to its source just 
south of Rockland Road east of Libertyville, Illinois. 
The project was authorized by the River and 
Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 (Section 116) and 
amended by the River and Harbor Act of March 7, 
1974 and the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986. 
Local Cooperation. The 1970 Act provided that 
local interests furnish without cost to the United 
States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal 
areas necessary for construction of the project; 
hold and save the United States free from damages 
due to construction; maintain and operate all works 
after completion without cost to the United States; 
and agree to bear all costs in excess of $200,000 for 
completing construction. The 1974 Act provided that 
the United States will maintain the channel free of 
trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed 
$150,000 per year with non-federal interests paying 
25 percent of the cost of maintenance. The 1986 
Water Resources Development Act changed the cost 
sharing to require that non-federal interests pay 50 
percent of the cost of maintenance plus cost of disposal. 
Operations and Results During Period. 
Maintenance: FY 94-95 contract costs were 
$53,750. Supervision and administration costs were 
$2,532. Real estate and engineering and design 
22-8

CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT 
costs were $708, and $28,980, respectively. Program 
management cost was $926. The total FY 1995 
federal and non-federal expenditures were $86,896 
and $185,038, respectively. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of 
existing project to September 30, 1995 was 
$4,349,359 of which $231,884 was for new work 
($191,884 regular funds and $40,000 contributed 
funds), and $4,117,475 was for maintenance 
($2,592,755 federal funds and $1,524,720 non-federal 
contributed funds). 
22. KANKAKEE RIVER 
ICE MANAGEMENT 
Location: Northern Illinois in Will County about 3 
miles downstream of the City of Wilmington. 
Existing Project. The project consists of over 1000 
lineal feet of triple pipeline running from a cooling pond 
at the Dresden Island Nuclear Power Station to the 
Kankakee River; a trailer mounted siphon system consisting 
of a gas engine and a vacuum pump; a fish screen 
support structure at the location of the pipe inlets within 
the cooling pond; and a fish screen. The siphon system is 
designed to withdraw warm water from the cooling pond 
and discharge it into the Kankakee River to prevent the 
build up of ice which results in ice jams that cause flooding 
of residential property. The demonstration project construction 
was completed in October 1987 at a construction 
cost of $517,116. Engineering and design costs were 
$146,467, including $69,467 for A/E contracts and $77,000 
for hired labor. These funds were provided by CRREL 
from the River Ice Management Demonstration R & D 
funds. Construction of a permanent fish screen converted 
the RIM demonstration project into a permanent project. 
Local Cooperation. Will County is the local sponsor, 
having signed the Project Cooperation Agreement in FY 
1993. The local sponsor is required to pay twenty-five 
percent of the cost of the installation of the permanent fish 
screen. All items of local cooperation have been complied 
with. 
Operations and Results During Period. 
None. The project was turned over to local interests in 
FY 1994. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The project is 100 
percent complete. Total costs of existing project to September 
30, 1995 were $59,679 ($45,000 federal funds and 
$14,679 non-federal ) for maintenance. 
23. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN 
Location. Lake George in Hobart, Indiana and 
Deep River watershed upstream of the lake through 
Lake Station, Indiana. 
Existing Project. The project consists of the 
removal of silt, aquatic growth and other material 
and the construction of silt traps or other devices to 
prevent and abate the deposition of sediment. Estimated 
cost (1994) for new work is $7,440,000 
includes $5,580,000 federal and $1,860,000 to be 
contributed by local interests. Project was authorized 
by Section 602 of the Water Resources Development 
Act (WRDA) of 1986. 
Local Cooperation. Section 602 (b), Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. By 
letter dated March 9, 1987 the City of Hobart, Indiana 
indicated that it was a potential local project 
sponsor and applied for credit for previous work 
applicable to the project under the provisions of 
Section 104 (d) of the 1986 WRDA. 
Operations and Results During Period. 
New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design 
was continued at a cost of $179,312. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. 
Preconstruction engineering and design is in 
progress. Total cost of the existing project to 
September 30, 1995 is $653,567. 
24. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN 
Location. Little Calumet River is located in 
northwest Indiana between the Illinois-Indiana 
State line and the Conrail Railroad in east Gary, 
Indiana. 
Existing Project. The project consists of replacing 
9.5 miles of existing spoil bank levees with 12.2 
miles of new levees, floodwalls, closure and 
appurtant structures between the Illinois-Indiana 
State line and Cline Avenue; construction of 9.7 
miles of set-back levees in Gary; a diversion structure 
at Hart Ditch; permanent evacuation of 29 
structures in the Black Oak area of Gary; flood 
proofing 38 residential structures in Gary; modifying 
7 miles of channel and 3 accompanying bridge 
culvert modifications; modifying 1 highway bridge; 
construction of 16.8 miles of hiking trails and accompanying 
recreation support facilities; and preservation 
of 788 acres of wetlands with wildlife 
mitigation measures. Estimated federal cost (1995) 
for new work is $151,000,000; $109,000,000 federal 
and $42,000,000 is to be contributed by local interests. 
The project was authorized by Section 401 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 
Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Little 
Calumet River Basin Development Commission. The 
local cooperation agreement was signed on August 
16, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide 
all lands, easements and rights-of-ways; provide all 
required relocations; and hold and save the United 
States from any damages due to construction or 
22-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
operation of the project. In addition, the local 
sponsor is required to pay a five percent cash contribution 
for structural flood control measures, fifty 
percent for recreation features and twenty-five percent 
for fish and wildlife enhancements. A memorandum 
of agreement with the local sponsor to 
design non-federal improvements was signed on 
May 20, 1992. 
Operations and Results During Period. Levee 
construction contracts for Stages II-3B (south) between 
Harrison and Broadway Streets, II-4 from 
Broadway Street to Martin Luther King Drive, and 
IV-2A between Burr and Chase Streets; the trench 
contract for Stage II-3C and a landscaping contract 
on the completed levee work (Stages II-1 between 
Harrison and Broadway, II-2 from Grant to Harrison 
Streets, II-3A from Georgia Street to Martin Luther 
King Drive, III from Chase to Grant Streets and V- 
1 Wicker Park) were awarded in FY 1995. The 
construction for the Stage I-4 demolition contract 
was completed in FY 1995. The construction contract 
for Stages II-3A, III and V-1 levee segment 
were completed in FY 1995. Real estate management 
costs were $363,609 ($344,497 federal and 
$19,112 non-federal). Engineering and design costs 
were $3,837,429 ($3,653,293 federal and $184,136 
non-federal) which includes $2,933,947 hired labor, 
($2,778,683 federal and $155,264 non-federal), 
$573,195 performed by other Corps of Engineers, 
($552,918 federal and $20,277 non-federal), $68,439 
performed by other federal agency, U.S. Geological 
Survey and $261,849 by contract ($253,254 federal 
and $8,595 non-federal). Construction contract costs 
were $1,691,716 ($1,554,258 federal and $137,458 
non-federal). Construction management costs were 
$294,271 ($280,594 federal and $13,677 non-federal). 
The road relocation cost for Stage II-3A from 
Georgia Street to Martin Luther King Drive was 
$35,454. Total federal and non-federal costs were 
$5,868,097 and $354,383, respectively. The design 
work for the non-federal improvements was continued 
at a cost of $51,355. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction 
is in progress. Total cost of existing project to 
September 30, 1995 was $34,057,823 for new work. 
Federal costs total $31,765,200; required non-federal 
costs total $2,146,076; non-federal improvements 
costs total $146,547. 
25. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER 
BASIN, CADY MARSH DITCH, IN 
Location. Cady Marsh is located in Lake County, 
Indiana. The Ditch is a tributary of the Little Calumet 
River system in northwest Indiana and flows 
through the Towns of Griffith and Highland. 
Existing Project. The Cady Marsh Ditch flood 
control project was authorized by Section 401 (a) of 
the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The 
project provides for diverting flood flows from Cady 
Marsh Ditch to the Little Calumet River through a 
diversion system under Arbogast Avenue in Griffith. 
Specifically, the project consists of improving 1,290 
feet of Cady Marsh Ditch between Colfax and 
Arbogast Avenues in Griffith, constructing approximately 
5,000 feet of large conduct pipes under 
Arbogast Avenue, excavating an open channel approximately 
2,850 feet long from the north end of 
Arbogast Avenue to the Little Calumet River, and 
constructing interior drainage improvements. The 
estimated cost (1995) for new work is $10,200,000 
of which $6,770,000 is federal and $3,430,000 is nonfederal. 
Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor is 
the Town of Griffith, IN. The local sponsor is 
required to provide all lands, easements and rightsof-
way; complete all required utility relocations; hold 
and save the United States free from damages due to 
construction or operation of the project; provide the 
required interior drainage improvements; operate 
and maintain the completed project; and make a 
cash contribution toward the cost of construction. 
Operations and Results During Period. 
New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design 
was continued at a cost of $207,811. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. 
Preconstruction engineering and design is in 
progress. The total cost of the existing project to 
September 30, 1995 was $551,768. 
26. McCOOK AND THORNTON 
RESERVOIRS, IL 
Location. The McCook Reservoir will be located 
within the communities of McCook and Hodgkins, 
Illinois at the existing McCook Quarry. The Thornton 
Reservoir will be located in the community of 
Thornton, Illinois at the existing Thornton Quarry. 
Existing Project. The project consists of converting 
two quarries into flood storage reservoirs. 
The McCook Reservoir will have a storage volume of 
32,100 acre-feet (9.8 billion gallons); the Thornton 
Reservoir will have a volume of 14,600 acre-feet (4.8 
billion gallons). The reservoirs will store floodwater 
from tunnels constructed or under construction by 
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the 
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater 
Chicago as part of the Tunnel and Reservoir Project 
(TARP). Estimated project cost (1995) is 
$598,000,000, including a federal cost for new work 
of $450,000,000, and $148,000,000 to be contributed 
by non-federal interests. Project was authorized by 
Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1988. 
22-10

CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT 
Local Cooperation. The Metropolitan Water 
Reclamation District of Greater Chicago will be the 
local sponsor and provide the required local cooperation. 
The local sponsor is required to provide all 
lands, easements and rights-of-ways; provide all 
required relocations; and hold and save the United 
States government free from any damages due to 
construction or operation of the project. In addition, 
local sponsors are required to pay a cash contribution 
to bring the total non-federal share of the flood 
control improvements to twenty-five percent of the 
total project cost. 
Operations and Results During Period. 
New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design 
was continued at a cost of$1,336,903, including 
$1,135,389 in hired labor including $34,180 for real 
estate activities and $80,547 for Program and Project 
Management; $5,222 for A-E contracts; $166,338 
performed by other Corps of Engineers; and $29,954 
performed by other federal agency. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. 
Preconstruction planning, engineering and design 
was in progress. Total costs of the existing project 
to September 30, 1995 were $13,647,560. 
27. NORTH BRANCH, 
CHICAGO RIVER, IL 
Location. The North Branch Chicago River 
Basin is located north of the City of Chicago in 
suburban Cook and Lake Counties. 
Existing Project. The project was authorized by 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and 
consists of constructing two excavated floodwater 
storage reservoirs on the West Fork and one excavated 
reservoir on the Middle Fork. Section 401 of 
the 1986 Act also included authorization to reimburse 
non-federal interests 50 percent of the costs of 
planning and construction for three existing reservoirs 
on the West Fork, known as Techny Reservoirs, 
and the existing Mid Fork Reservoir on the 
Middle Fork. In July 1990, the federal government 
reimbursed the non-federal interests $4,467,298 for 
the Techny and mid Fork Reservoirs. The total 
federal cost was $4,537,435 for these reservoirs. 
Reservoir 27 in the Village of Bannockburn, is 
located on the West Fork, 12.7 miles above its 
confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. It 
has a floodwater storage capacity of 525 acre-feet. 
Reservoir 29A is located 9.6 miles above the mouth 
of the West Fork and 3.1 miles south of Reservoir 27. 
The floodwater storage capacity is 575 acre-feet. 
Two project features, channel relocation and constrution 
of two bridges, are a non-federal responsibility. 
Reservoir 15 is located near the City of Green 
Oaks on the Middle Fork, 22.1 miles above its 
confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. 
The floodwater storage capacity is 500 acre-feet. 
The reservoir is approximately 42 feet deep except 
in the sedimentation pool area which is about 15 
feet deeper. Estimated federal cost (1994) for new 
work is $20,774,000. An additional $14,026,000 
will be the required contribution by local interests. 
The local sponsor has contributed $550,100 for the 
non-federal improvements for Reservoir 29A. The 
non-federal clean-up of soils contaminated with lead 
shot pellets at Reservoir 29A may cost between $5.0 
and $8.0 million. 
Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is required 
to provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway; 
provide all required relocations; and hold and 
save the United States government free from any 
damages due to construction or operation of the 
project. In addition, local sponsors are required to 
pay a cash contribution to bring the total non-federal 
share of the flood control improvements to 
twenty-five percent of the total project cost. 
Operations and Results During Period. 
New Work: The total FY 1995 authorized project 
cost for all three reservoirs was $58,744 ($53,220 
federal and $5,516 non-federal). Construction of 
Reservoir 15 was completed in May 1992. The FY 
1995 cost for Reservoir 15 was $0 (-$2,497 federal 
and $2,497 non-federal) for construction. The FY 
1995 cost for Reservoir 27, completed in June 1990, 
was $0 (-$3,025 federal; $3,025 non-federal). The 
total FY 1995 cost for Reservoir 29A, which was 
completed in September 1994, was $301,509 ($58,750 
federal; -$6 non-federal cash; $8,196 non-federal 
improvements; and $234,569 for non-federal cleanup 
of soils contaminated with lead shot pellets). The 
$301,509 Reservoir 29A FY 1995 total is itemized as 
follows: authorized project cost of $58,744 which 
included $52,294 for the construction contract, 
$3,306 for construction management, and $3,144 for 
engineering and design; non-federal bridge and channel 
improvmeents cost of $8,196 for construction 
management; and the lead shot clean-up cost totalling 
$234,569 of which $120,326 was for construction, 
$55,516 was performed by other Corps, $24,114 
for construction management and $34,613 for engineering 
and design. A Post Authorization Change 
report was completed for submittal to Congress 
because the new cost estimate exceeds the maximum 
cost set by Section 902 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing 
project is 99 percent complete. Construction of 
Reservoir 27 is complete, except for some limited 
reservoir side slope stabilization which will be completed 
once the Post Authorization Change report is 
approved by the Congress. Reservoir 15 is complete. 
Reservoir 29A construction is complete. 
Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 
1995 were $22,489,645, of which $20,192,417 was 
22-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
federal and $2,297,228 was non- federal, excluding 
the $4,493,298 non-federal cost for the Techny and 
Mid Fork Reservoirs. A total $549,022 in nonfederal 
funds has been expended on bridge and 
channel betterments at Reservoir 29A. An additional 
$5,933,272 in non-federal funds has been 
expended on investigations in connection with the 
clean-up of soils contaminated with lead shot pellets 
at Reservoir 29A. 
28. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL 
Location. The reservoir will be located in an 
unincorporated portion of Elk Grove Township in 
northwestern Cook County, Illinois about 1 mile 
northwest of Chicago O'Hare International Airport. 
Existing Project. The project consists of a 1,050 
acre-foot capacity reservoir, excavated to a depth of 
80 feet. The reservoir would be constructed at the 
terminus of the existing system of 6.6 miles of deep 
tunnels, constructed under the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation 
District of Greater Chicago Tunnel and 
Reservoir Project (TARP). Estimated project cost 
(1995) is $33,300,000 including a federal cost for 
new work of $24,600,000 and $8,700,000 to be contributed 
by local interests. The project was authorized 
by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986. 
Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the 
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater 
Chicago. The local cooperation agreement for the 
first construction contract, creek relocation, was 
signed on July 31, 1990. The local sponsor is 
required to provide all lands, easements and rightsof-
way; provide all required relocations; and hold 
and save the United States government free from 
any damages due to construction or operation of the 
project. In addition, the local sponsor is required to 
pay a cash contribution of five percent of the total 
project costs. The local cooperation agreement for 
the second construction contract, reservoir excavation 
and lining, was signed July 29, 1991. 
Operations and Results During Period. Construction 
was continued at a cost of $3,918,370 
($3,865,983 federal and $52,387 non-federal). Real 
estate management costs were $12,325 ($11,672 
federal and $653 non-federal). Non-Federal utility 
relocation costs were -$735,980. Engineering and 
design costs were $1,189,444 ($1,112,192 federal 
and $77,252 non-federal) which included $68,798 
performed by other Corps of Engineers and $117,939 
($102,768 federal and $15,171 non-federal) for A-E 
contract, and $1,002,707 ($940,626 federal and 
$62,081 non-federal) for hired labor. Construction 
management costs were $308,303; and $13,251 for 
project management hired labor. Total federal and 
non-federal costs were $5,311,401 and -$605,688, 
respectively. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. 
Preconstruction planning and engineering is completed. 
Construction is in progress. Total costs of 
the existing project to September 30, 1995 were 
$20,357,957 for new work. Federal costs total 
$17,080,312; nonfederal costs total $3,277,645. 
29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
See table 22-F. 
30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Emergency flood control activities, repair, flood 
fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congressional 
antecedent legislation). 
Program 
Fiscal Year Costs 
to September 30, 1995 
Disaster Preparedness 
Disaster Assistance (FEMA) 
$ 112,627 
13,603 
Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to 
Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, Public 
Law 526, 79th Congress. 
Fiscal year 1995 costs were $160 federal and $0. 
Work on the project Development Analysis was terminated 
for the Kankakee River Ramsey's Landing, 
IN project ($160); the project did not meet the criteria 
for Corps participation. 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of 
Flood Control Act of 1965, as amended. 
Fiscal year costs were $78,227 federal and $35,429 
non-federal for flood control activities. The reconnaissance 
report for Little Calumet River South 
Holland, IL ($6,386) was terminated; study cost 
was equal to or greater than the cost of project 
implementation. The reconnaissance report for the 
Village of Palos Park, Cook County, IL ($805) was 
terminated because the project was not economically 
feasible. The reconnaissance report for Tinley 
Creek, IL was completed at a cost of $6,909; the 
project has been terminated for lack of a local sponsor. 
The feasibility phase was completed for North 
Libertyville Estates at a cost of $20,036 federal and 
$35,422 non-federal. The feasibility phase was 
continued for Valley View, IL at a cost of $43,996 
federal and $7 non-federal. The feasibility phase 
was completed for Fox River, McHenry County ($95). 
22-12

CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT 
General Investigations 
31. SURVEYS 
Fiscal Year 1995 costs were $930,920 federal and 
$140,465 non-federal itemized as follows: 
Federal Non-federal 
Flood Damage 
Prevention Studies $ 507,932 $108,034 
Shoreline 
Protection Studies 185,957 0 
Special Studies 17,694 0 
Review of Authorized 
Projects 74,172 0 
Miscellaneous Activities 82,918 0 
Coordination Studies 62,247 32,431 
32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
BASIC DATA 
Fiscal Year 1995 costs of $76,527 federal and $578 
non-federal itemized as follows: 
Federal Non-federal 
Flood Plain 
Management Services $ 72,527 $578 
Hydrologic Studies 4,000 0 
22-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
1. Burns Waterway New Work: 
Harbor, IN Approp. 0 0 0 0 13,584,000 
(Federal Funds) Cost 0 0 0 0 13,584,000 
Maint: 
Approp. 310,000 868,000 797,000 1,628,000 9,204,104 
Cost 272,584 846,233 819,056 1,507,047 9,043,816 
(Contributed New Work: 
Funds) Contrib. 0 0 0 0 15,900 
Cost 0 0 0 0 15,900 
2. Burns Waterway New Work: 
Small Boat Approp. 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 
Harbor, IN Cost 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 
(Federal Funds) Maint: 
Approp. 118,000 125,000 205,555 80,000 1,130,935 
Cost 112,614 114,401 221,703 81,794 1,130,127 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds) Contrib. 0 0 0 0 1,770,558 
Cost 0 0 0 0 1,770,558 
3. Burns Waterway New Work: 
Harbor (Major Rehab), IN Approp. 0 0 0 2,747,000 2,747,000 
(Federal Funds) Cost 0 0 0 1,992,823 1,992,823 
Maint: 
Approp. 0 0 0 0 0 
Cost 0 0 0 0 0 
(Contributed New Work: 
Funds) Contrib. 0 0 0 0 0 
Cost 0 0 0 0 0 
4. Calumet Harbor New Work: 
and River, IL Approp. 0 0 0 0 22,578,567' 
and IN Cost 0 0 0 0 22,578,567 1' 
(Federal Funds) Maint: 
Approp. 710,500 734,000 1,015,562 1,400,000 31,425,799 2 
Cost 559,663 881,444 1,005,599 1,424,681 31,403,021 2 
Rehab: 
Approp. 0 0 0 0 5,428,001 
Cost 0 0 0 0 5,428,001: 
(Contributed Maint: 
Funds) Contib. 0 0 0 0 836,667 
Cost 0 0 0 0 836,667 
5. Chicago Harbor, New Work: 
IL Approp. 0 0 0 0 4,788,827 
(Federal Funds) Cost 0 0 0 0 4,788,827 
Maint: 
Approp. 1,506,500 2,481,000 2,035,000 1,815,000 24,861,546 
Cost 1,573,400 2,597,340 2,075,188 1,783,944 24,758,349 
Rehab: 
Approp. 0 0 0 0 1,326,600 
Cost 0 0 0 0 1,326,600 
22-14

CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT 
TABLE 22-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
6. Chicago River, IL 
7. Indiana Harbor, IN 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
8. Lake Michigan 
Diversion 
9. Michigan City 
Harbor, IN 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
10. Waukegan 
Harbor. IL 
14. Casino Beach, IL 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
0
0 
0
0 
480,000 405,000 287,000 365,000 
457,511 442,969 298,930 366,910 
0
0 
408,000 302,000 359,000 402,000 
393,599 305,158 357,931 377,951 
0
0 
0
0 
530,000 771,000 434,000 469,000 
489,502 793,672 442,839 451,026 
0
0 
1,749,000 395,000 792,000 226,000 
1,481,169 779,824 784,221 246,715 
0
0
0
0 
55,000 
55,000 
0
0 
0
0 
456,000 889,000 2,030,000 502,000 
483,245 923,906 1,892,577 661,789 
375,000 110,000 820,000 1,000,000 
152,230 199,068 291,476 1,089,216 
0
0 
0 1,970,000 
0 1,140,650 
22-15 
1,500,565 5 
1,500,565 
14,823,394 6 
14,817,883 6 
4,897,148 ' 
4,897,148 7 
11,738,988 8 
11,697,2228 
12,500 
12,500 
2,204,000 
2,177,039 
1,543,646 9 
1,543,646 9 
11,098,054 
11,095,954 
1,618,670 
1,618,670 
30,512 
30,512 
55,000 
55,000 
823,026 10o 
823,026 10o 
12,544,76811 
12,530,650 11 
2,525,000 
1,826,148 
1,970,000 
1,140,650

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 22-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
15. Chicago 
Shoreline, IL 
16. Illinois Beach 
State Park, IL 
17. Indiana Dunes 
Nat'l Lakeshore 
Beverly Shores, 
IN 
18. Indiana Shoreline 
Erosion, IN 
21. Chicago River, IL 
(North Branch) 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
22. Kankakee River 
Ice Management 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
23. Lake George, 
Hobart, IN 
24. Little Calumet 
River, IN 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
(Non-Federal 
Improvements) 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
750,000 291,000 612,000 
42,642 616,743 953,778 
0
0
0
0 
21,000 
21,193 
(15,000)
0 
0 
548 
8,000 43,000 
8,000 33,229 
0 20,000 
1,160 2,903 
0 
10,665 
(12,800) 
812
0
0 
51,000 
58,324 
12,800 
56,672
0
0 
145,000 450,000 147,000 92,000 
113,243 176,173 179,647 86,896 
0
0 
175,000 175,000 175,000 165,362 
118,720 246,753 180,196 185,038 
0
0
0
0 
45,000 
43,675 
15,000 
14,996 
0 
1,322 
(321) 
(317) 
330,000 260,000 200,000 200,000 
98,645 131,333 148,425 179,312 
3,013,000 10,146,000 
2,911,261 9,776,804 
13,842,700 1,569,600 
6,314,587 5,868,097 
304,000 750,000 380,000 420,000 
684,794 684,765 331,028 354,383 
50,000 140,000 50,000 
10,759 84,443 51,355 
1,653,000 
1,613,163 
22,200 
11,908 
660,000 
660,000 
569,000 
566,553 
431,800 12 
423,514 12 
191,884 
191,884 
2,607,350 
2,592,755 
40,000 
40,000 
1,737,441 
1,524,720 
45,000 
44,997 
14,679 
14,679 
1,204,000 
653,567 
35,652,300 13 
31,765,200 13 
2,358,000 
2,146,076 
240,000 
146,557 
22-16

CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT 
TABLE 22-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
25. Little Calumet New Work: 
River Basin, Cady Approp. 170,000 170,000 310,000 150,000 1,020,000 
Marsh Ditch, IN Cost 160,368 87,075 43,575 207,811 551,768 
26. McCook and New Work: 
Thornton Reservoirs, Approp. 2,000,000 3,500,000 13,000,000 0 22,374,000 
IL Cost 2,227,749 3,523,779 3,659,467 1,336,903 13,647,560 
27. North Branch New Work: 
Chicago River, IL Approp. 0 0 199,000 0 20,252,500 14 
(Federal Funds) Cost 1,321,052 595,862 200,450 53,228 20,192,417 14 
(Contributed New Work: 
Funds Required) Contrib. 159,017 0 207,987 0 2,297,254 
Cost 545,125 150,244 251,779 5,516 2,297,228 
(Non-Federal New Work: 
Improvements) Contrib. 0 49,348 0 0 550,100 
Cost 59,491 63,926 7,320 8,196 549,022 
(Non-Federal New Work: 
Lead shot Contrib. 1,071,967 2,250,000 2,354,303 200,000 6,335,170 
Clean-up) Cost 275,044 2,387,752 2,622,451 234,569 5,933,272 
28. O'Hare Reservoir, New Work: 
IL Approp. 4,000,000 3,000,000 5,000,000 0 18,882,000 
Cost 1,474,354 3,907,338 3,310,947 5,311,401 17,080,312 
(Contributed New Work: 
Funds) Contrib. 3,640,700 0 100,000 150,000 4,191,200 
Cost 1,267,885 2,204,093 352,689 (605,688) 3,277,645 
1 Includes $855,973 for previous projects. 
2 Excludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant 
to decree (No. 54-C-1608) regarding removal of flue dust 
and includes $45,230 for previous projects. 
3 Includes $689,001 in settlement pursuant to decree 
regarding removal of flue dust. 
4 Includes $446,005 for previous projects. 
5 Includes $955,886 for previous projects. 
6 Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 
7 Includes $60,668 for previous projects. 
8 Includes $2,509 for previous projects. 
9 Includes $287,389 for previous projects. 
10 Includes $218,233 for previous projects. 
11 Includes $15,711 for previous projects. 
12 Includes $107,000 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 
1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 
1105-2-159 dated 25 Sept 1985. 
13 Includes $670,529 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 
1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 
1105-2-159 dated 25 Sept 1985. 
14 Includes $489,310 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 
1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 
1105-2-159 dated 25 Sept 1985. 
22-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Section 107 
Mar. 3, 1899 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Mar. 3, 1905 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Sept. 22, 1922 
Aug. 30, 19351.2 
Aug. 30, 19351.2 
Mar. 2, 19453 
Jul. 14, 196013 
Oct. 23, 196213 
Oct. 27, 196513 
Jul. 11, 1870 
Jun. 14, 1880 
Mar. 3, 1899 
Jul. 25, 1912 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Mar. 3, 1931 
BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN 
(See Section 1 and 3 of Text) 
Provides for breakwater and channel to present dimensions and depths, a 
north breakwater, west bulkhead, approach channel and outer harbor, 
east and west harbor arms. 
BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN 
(See Section 2 of Text) 
Provides for a 700-foot north breakwater, a 950-foot west breakwater, an 
entrance channel 11-feet deep, a harbor-of-refuge area 10 feet deep, and 
a channel in Burns Waterway 6 feet deep. 
CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN 
(See Section 4 of Text) 
Outer harbor protected by breakwaters. 
Five turning basins. 
Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins. 
Consolidated the 2 projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. 
Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth and 
dimensions; deepen river-entrance channel and river to existing project 
depths; widen and straighten river channel; 5 turning basins to same 
depth as adjacent channel. 
Dredging area A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance 
channel 300 feet wide and 21 feet deep. 
An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep through 
shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between breakwaters. 
Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in 
river entrance up to E.J. & E. Ry. Bridge 
Deepen, widen, and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J. and E. 
Ry. Bridge, to and including turning basins 1, 3, and 5 to 27 feet; enlarge 
turning basins 3 and 5; a channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 
3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 
from project. 
Modification of Act of Oct. 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and Eastern 
Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to full 
width of the south draw to depth of 27 feet, and temporary protection for 
center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago, and St. Louis 
Railroad Bridge (Nickle Plate) to permit dredging of full width of south 
bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. 
CHICAGO HARBOR, IL 
(See Section 5 of Text) 
Inner breakwaters and inner basin. 
Exterior Breakwater. 
Present project depth in basin, and entrance to Chicago River. 
Shore-arm and southerly extension of exterior breakwater 
Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. 
Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park 
Commissioners. 
Public Law, 89-298, H Doc. 
160. 88th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Detailed Project Report 
dated February 1983. 
Annual Report, 1896, pp. 
2584 et Seq. and H. Doc 277, 
54th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 172, 54th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 346, 60th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc.494, 72d Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc., 180. 73rd Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 233, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc.,149, 86th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc., 87th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Report No. 973, 89th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Ex. Doc. 114, 41st Cong.,2d 
Sess. and Annual Report 1879, 
pp. 1562-1567 
Annual Report, 1870 pp 
1562-1567 
Annual Report, 1897, pp 
2790-2791 
H. Doc. 710, Cong., 2d Sess. 
H.Doc.1303, 64th Cong., 1st 
Sess. 
Public Law 797, 71st Cong. 
22-18

CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT 
TABLE 22-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Dec. 4, 1981 
Jul. 30, 1983 
Mar. 3, 1899 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Jul. 24, 1946 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Mar. 4, 1913 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Mar. 20, 1922 
Mar. 3, 1925 
Mar. 2, 1929 
July 3, 193010 
Jul. 30, 1932 
Aug. 30, 193511 
Aug. 28, 1937 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Oct. 27, 19652 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over 
certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern 
part of outer harbor. 
Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; and 
deepen a channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 
1,300 feet wide. 
Provides for lock operations and maintenance responsibilities in the 
interests of navigation 
CHICAGO RIVER, IL 
(See Section 6 of Text) 
For project depth of 21 feet in lieu of that fixed by act of June 3, 1896. 
Turning basins. 
Interpreted by Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908 as adopting new work of 
the then existing project for 21-foot depth. 
Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. 
Dredging channel 9 feet deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and 
river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 
50 feet wide to Addison St. 
INDIANA HARBOR, IN 
(See Section 7 of Text) 
Maintenance of outer harbor. Maintenance of inner harbor channel 
when deeded free of cost to and accepted by the United States. 
Breakwaters. 
Lighthouse crib, present length and alignment easterly and northerly 
breakwaters. 
Reduce length of channel to be maintained in extension to Lake George. 
Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length 
and alignment of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Steel and Tube Co. 
about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. 
Accept 2.3 acres of land for construction of the Forks Turning Basin. 
Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and 
turning basin at the Forks. 
Authorized Secretary of War to sell Inland Steel Co., about 1,903 linear 
feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. 
Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer harbor, 
deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of canal and 
portion of Calumet River Branch to 141st St. 
Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement of 
Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. 
Increase authorized depths of 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel; 28 
feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E.J. & 
E. Ry, Bridge. 
Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point 
lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 
feet, except through bridge openings. 
LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION 
(See Section 8 of Text) 
Responsible for monitoring of Laka Michigan Diversion 
Public Law 14, 79th Cong. 
H. Doc. 485, 87th Cong., 
2d Sess 4 
Section 107 of Public Law 
97-88 Public Law 98-63. 
Specified in act. 
Specified in act. 
H. Doc. 95, 56th Cong. 
1st Sess. (Annual Report, 
1900 p. 3863 and Annual 
Report 1909, p. 709) 
H.Doc.,1294, 64th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H.Doc. 767, 78th Cong., 
2d Sess.' ,7 
H. Doc. 1113, 60th Cong., 
2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 690, 62d Cong., 
2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 6, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Public Law 176, 67th Cong. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 21, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. 
Public Law 219, 72d Cong. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 29, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 13, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc., 195, 86th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc 227, 89th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Section 1142, Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 
-22 -19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 22-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN 
(See Section 9 of Text) 
East breakwater and old east pier inclosing the outer basin. 
Extension of east pier. 
Mar. 3, 1889 
Mar. 3, 1905 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Sec. 107 
Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. 
Lower turning basin. 
Rebuild west pier as at present located. 
Present project dimensions of entrance channel. 
Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, 
eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and 
uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east 
breakwater and old east pier inclosing outer basin. 
Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, dredging outer 
basin, and enlarging entrance to basin through east pier. 
Recommendations of a Board 
of Engineers. Annual Report 
1870. p. 123. 
Reports of Boards of Engineers. 
Annual Report 1851, 
pp 218 7-2189; Annual Report 
1882. p. 2264-2266. 
Annual Report 1897, pp. 
2903-2904. 
Joint Resolution of Congress 
approved May 13, 1908. 
Public Law 23. 
H. Doc. 279, 69th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 34, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper turning basin Detailed Project Report dated 
to E. Street Bridge. June 19658 
WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL 
(See Section 10 of Text) 
Jun. 14, 1880 Parallel piers and basins. 
Aug. 3, 1882 Modified location of harbor entrance. 
Jun. 13, 1902 Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at inner end 
of north pier, and dredge channel and basin to depth of 20 feet. 
Jul. 3, 1930 Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of north piers 
and enlarging inner basin. 
Mar. 2, 1945 Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from outer end 
of north pier to project depth in lake, and dredge an anchorage area in 
southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of 
Dec. 17, 1970 
Sec. 201 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Annual Report 1880, p. 142 
Annual Report,1882, 
pp. 277, 2162. 
H. Doc. 343, 56th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 27, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 116, 77th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. 
Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer harbor to H. Doc. 368, 90th Cong., 
25 feet and extending to the depth in Lake Michigan, at widths varying 2d Sess. 
from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth 
to 23 feet at a width of 180 feet, and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet 
and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. 
CASINO BEACH, IL 
(See Section 14 of Text) 
Provides for encasing approximately 1,800 feet of the existing 
Casino Beach jetty in steel sheet piling and a concrete cap, and 
replacing beach fill. 
ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK, IL 
(See Section 16 of Text) 
Provides for 46 offshore breakwaters approximately 150 feet long, 
initial beach nourishment of 100,000 cubic yards, and periodic 
nourishment of 100,000 cubic yards at 5-year intervals. 
Feasibility Report 
dated February 1983. 
Draft Feasibility Report 
dated June 1982. 
22-20 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 17, 1986

CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT 
TABLE 22-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized, Documents 
Dec. 4, 1981 
Jul. 30, 1983 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 17, 1988 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Dec. 31, 1970 
Nov. 17, 1986 
INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, 
BEVERLY SHORES, IN 
(See Section 17 of Text) 
Provides for emergency shore protection repairs to stone revetment initially 
constructed in 1973. 
Provides for operations and maintenance of the shore protection measures. 
INDIANA SHORELINE EROSION, IN 
(See Section 18 of Text) 
Provides for beach nourishment along a two-mile reach of shore west of 
Michigan City Harbor, Indiana. 
LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN 
(See Section 23 of Text) 
Provides for removal of silt, aquatic growth and construction of silt traps. 
LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN 
(See Section 24 of Text) 
Provides for levee construction, a diversion control structure at the mouth 
of Hart Ditch. Permanent evacuation of a portion of the Black Oak area 
of Gary and non-structural flood proofing measures in Gary. 
LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, 
CADY MARSH DITCH, IN 
(See Section 25 of Text) 
Provides for widening and deepening 1,250 feet of Cady Marsh Ditch, 
installing 4,880 feet of pipe, and excavating 2,850 feet of open channel. 
McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL 
(See Section 26 of Text) 
Provides for construction of two floodwater storage reservoirs in the 
quarries of the same name. 
NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO RIVER, IL 
(See Section 21 and 27 of Text) 
Construction of three reservoirs and reimbursement to locals for 50 percent 
of the costs of Techny and Mid-Fork Reservoirs. 
Clearing fallen trees, roots and other debris and objects which contribute 
flooding. 
O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL 
(See Section 28 of Text) 
Provides for a 1,050 acre-foot excavated reservoir. 
Public Law 97-88 
Public Law 98-63 
Sec. 501, Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986. 
Sec. 602. Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986. 
Sec. 401. Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 
Feasibility Report 
dated April 1984. 
Sec. 3 Water Resources 
Development Act of 1988. 
H. Doc. 100-72, 100th Cong. 
1st Sess., Sec. 401, Water 
Resources Development Act 
of 1986. 
River and Harbor Act.(Sec.116) 
Sec. 401, Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986. 
1. Included in Public Works Administrative Program 
September 6, 1943, and Dec. 16, 1933. 
2. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 
(dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.) 
3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 
(breakwater closure). 
4. Contains latest map of harbor. Uncompleted portion is 
inactive. 
5. Contains latest map of river. 
6. Latest published map is an Annual Report for 1914, 
opposite p. 2928. 
7. Contains latest published map of North Branch 
above North Ave. 
8. Contains latest published map. 
9. Completed under previous project. 
10. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 
(widen and deepen Lake George Branch). 
11. Included in Public Works Administration Program Sept. 
6, 1933, and July 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was 
deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen main canal and the 
Calumet River Branch). 
12. Project deauthorized in 1977. 
13. Project deauthorized in 1989. 
22-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 22-C EXISTING NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
See 
Section Length Width Depth 
in Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 
1. Burns Waterway 
Harbor, IN 
2. Burns Waterway 
SBH, IN 
4. Calumet Harbor 
and River, IL 
and IN 
5. Chicago Harbor, 
IL 
6. Chicago River, 
IL 
7. Indiana Harbor, 
IN 
9. Michigan City 
Harbor. IN 
10. Waukegan Harbor, 
IL 
North Breakwater 
West Breakwater 
Approach Channel 
Outer Harbor 
East Harbor Arm 
West Harbor Arm 
4,630 
1,200 
2,200 
3,700 
2,100 
3,800 
678 
1,043 
1,200 
5,593 
North Breakwater 
West Breakwater 
Approach Channel 
Burns Waterway 
Northerly Crib Breakwater 
Southerly Steel Breakwater 
North Pier 
Chicago Confined Disposal Facility 
Approach Channel 
Outer Harbor 
River Entrance 
Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge 
to turning basin No. 3 
Turning Basin No. 3 to Turning Basin No. 5 
Approach into Lake Calumet 
Extension in Lake Calumet 
Turning Basins 1, 3, and 5 
Shore arm extension 
Exterior breakwater 
Exterior breakwater southerly ext. 
North inner breakwater 
South inner breakwater 
North Pier 
Approach Channel 
Channel and maneuver 
Lock 
Inner Basin 
Entrance Channel 
Main Branch of Chicago River 
North Branch of Chicago River 
North Branch Canal 
North Branch Turning Basin 
Northerly Breakwater 
Easterly Breakwater 
Approach Channel 
Outer Harbor 
Entrance Channel 
Main Channel 
Turning Basin 
Lake George Branch 
Calumet River Branch 
Detached Breakwater 
West Pier 
East Pier 
East Breakwater 
Entrance Channel 
Main Channel 
Outer Basin 
Trail Creek 
Trail Creek 
North Breakwater and Shore Connection 
North Pier and North Revetment 
South Pier 
Entrance Channel 
Channel to Inner Basin 
Inner Basin 
Anchorage Area 
400 
Varies 
620 
620 
200 
100 
6,714 
5,007 
2,450 
2,979 
9,700 3,200 
10,500 2,000 
3,000 290 
21,100 200 
and variable 
8,000 
4,000 
3,000 
2,250 
5,421 
4,944 
4,034 
2,544 
960 
6,600 
2,200 
600 
1,270 
7,300 
3,800 
11,100 
5,500 
1,120 
2,525 
7,200 
4,200 
3,600 
7,400 
3,700 
2,500 
1,304 
835 
1,276 
1,000 
1,900 
2,400 
900 
3,000 
2,300 
1,896 
2,074 
3,111 
3,250 
1,700 
1,650 
'I 
Variable 
400 
1,000 
800 
1,300 
80 
740 
190-470 
190-390 
91-390 
56-210 
800 
Varies 
65-280 
61-210 
64-160 
160-260 
150-425 
120-150 
900 
50-100 
50 
390 
200 
375-500
' 
'Area of about 6 acres. 
22-22 
30 
28 
27 
27 
11 
9 
29 
28 
27 
27 
earth 
28 
rock 
27 
27 
27 
27 
29 
28 
23 
21 
21 
21 
21 
21 
21 
29 
28 
27 
22 
22 
22 
22 
18 
18 
8-12
86 
22 
18 
18
8

CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT 
TABLE 22-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION 
(See Section 13 of Text) 
Cost to September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Report For Construction Maintenance 
Calumet River Bridges' 1967 $ 1,625,068 
'Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6(g) of the Act of October 16, 1966, 
P.L. 89-670 
TABLE 22-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS 
Cost to September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Report For Construction Maintenance 
Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National 
Lakeshore, IN 1984 $1,500,000 
Hollywood-Ardmore Beach, Chicago, IL 1982 237,271 
Evanston, IL 1979 766,052 
Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL 1976 244,889 
Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL' 1975 65,611 
Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Kenilworth, IL2 1975 5,200 
'Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1954. 
2Uncompleted portion deauthorized in 1977. 
TABLE 22-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Cost to September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Report For Construction Maintenance 
Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park 
Communities, Chicago, IL 1989 $2,062,347 
Little Calumet River, IL 1984 583,000 
22-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 22-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Date Funds Funds 
Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Winnetka, IL 1975 1977 
Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Chicago, IL 1975 1977 
Kankakee River, IL and IN 
Levee between Shelby Bridge and 
Baum's Bridge in IN 1938 Nov. 17, 1986 
Little Calumet River, IL and IN 
Little Calumet River and Tributaries, 
IL and IN 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 53,136 
Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 
Widening and straightening the Calumet 
River in the vicinity of 106th Street 
and closing the gap between breakwaters, 
and dredging minor shoals in the outer 
harbor. 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 
Wilmington Ice Control Demonstration Nov. 18, 1991 
Des Plaines River Wetland Demonstration Nov. 18, 1993 
22-24

ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT* 
This district comprises most of the northern half of 
Illinois, portions of southern Wisconsin, southern and 
southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and 
northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin of 
Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries 
between mile 300 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and 
of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at 
mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois 
Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage 
basins. The section of the Mississippi River between river 
miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi 
River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL............. 23-2 
2. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN.................. 23-2 
3. Mississippi River between Missouri River 
and Minneapolis, MN.......................23-3 
4. Upper Mississippi River - Illinois 
Navigation Study ............................ 23-3 
5. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental 
Management Program (UMRS-EMP), 
IL, IA, MN, MO, WI.......................23-3 
6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects......... 23-4 
Flood Control 
7. Coralville Lake, IA ....... .................... 23-4 
8. Des Moines Recreational River and 
Greenbelt, IA ............................... 23-4 
9. Farm Creek, IL.............................23-4 
10. Loves Park, IL ...................... ..... 23-4 
11. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA ........ 23-5 
12. Saylorville Lake, IA .......................... 23-5 
13. West Des Moines, IA ......................... 23-5 
14. Muscatine Island, IA........................23-6 
15. Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects............................23-6 
16. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects....... 23-6 
17. Flood Control Work Under Special 
Authorization...............................23-6 
General Investigations 
18. Surveys....................................23-6 
19. Collection and Study of Basic Data............ 23-6 
20. Preconstruction Engineering and Design........ 23-6 
Tables Page 
Table 23-A Cost and Financial Statement........ 23-7 
Table 23-B Authorizing Legislation............... 23-8 
Table 23-C Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects ...................... 23-11 
Table 23-D Not Applicable 
Table 23-E Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects.................... 23-11 
Table 23-F Not Applicable 
Table 23-G Deauthorized Projects..............23-13 
Table 23-H Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects...................23-14 
Table 23-I Flood Control Work Under Special 
Authorization .................... . 23-15 
Table 23-J Illinois Waterway: Existing 
Locks and Dams.................... 23-17 
Table 23-K Illinois Waterway: Lock and Dam 
Construction, Foundations, Cost.....23-17 
Table 23-L Illinois Waterway: Additional 
Features Entering into Cost.......... 23-18 
Table 23-M Illinois Waterway: Existing Project... 23-19 
Table 23-N Illinois Waterway: Total Cost of 
Existing Project...................23-20 
23-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Navigation 
1. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI 
CANAL, IL 
Location. This canal extends for 75 miles from the Illinois 
River near LaSalle, IL, to the Mississippi River at Rock 
Island, IL. A feeder canal, 29 miles in length, extends from 
the summit level of the canal to the Rock River at Rock Falls, 
IL.
Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report 
for 1962 for details regarding project. The canal was constructed 
in the period 1892-1918. The canal has not been 
operated for navigation since June 1951 in accordance with 
Corps policy to discontinue operation of waterways affording 
little or no benefit to navigation. The River and Harbor 
Act of 1958 authorized the appropriation of $2,000,000 for 
the purpose of placing the canal in proper condition for public 
recreational use and to convey and transfer the canal to the 
State of Illinois as part of the State park system. 
The repair and modification program was initiated in 1961, 
and a number of canal features have been repaired or 
modified. In connection with this program, fee title to 1,062 
acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of 
land in Rock River at Rock Falls, formerly under navigation 
flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois 
accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River 
and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the additional appropriation 
of $6,528,000 to be expended for the repair, modification, 
and maintenance of bridges, title transfer, modification 
or rehabilitation of hydraulic structures, fencing, clearing auxiliary 
ditches, and for the repair and modification of other 
canal property appurtenances. 
The repair and modification work was underway until a 
suit was filed by three Illinois counties and their Commissioners 
of Highway against the Federal Government and the 
State in 1974 over maintenance of highway bridges crossing 
the canal. After the lawsuit was filed, further rehabilitation 
work by the Federal Government on the canal was suspended. 
On November 4, 1981, the Corp of Engineers deposited 
$3,722,572 with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court in 
Chicago in full satisfaction of the Court's judgment. These 
funds were used by the counties to complete bridge rehabilitation 
work as directed in the court order. Rehabilitation work 
by the Federal Government in coordination with the state was 
resumed in 1984 with the remaining authorization expended 
in 1987. 
The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized 
an additional appropriation of $8,472,000 to accomplish 
the work described in the 1970 River and Harbor Act. 
The State of Illinois filed an additional lawsuit against the 
United States on July 6, 1987 in the U.S. Claims Court in 
the amount of $8,472,572. In a preliminary decision on 
September 22, 1988, the court dismissed the claim for 
$3,722,572. A settlement agreement between the State of Illinois 
and the United States was signed on November 14, 1991. 
The agreement provided that Illinois release all claims against 
the United States as stipulated in the claims court and that 
the United States provide $4,750,000 to Illinois as reimbursement 
for previous repair work performed upon the canal 
bridges by Illinois. On December 16, 1991, the U. S. Claims 
Court entered a judgment for $4,750,000 in favor of the State 
of Illinois. This judgment was paid in FY92. 
Once funds are received, principal work features to restore 
the canal to acceptable conditions consist of the repair or 
resonstruction of retaining walls, embankmenets, portions of 
the lock and dam structures, culverts, drainage ditches, and 
other related work features which the United States has maintained 
or has been obligated to maintain under previous 
agreements. These features are consistent with a Master 
Management Plan prepared by the Illinois Department of 
Conservation. NEPA documentation to assess remaining 
work items must be completed prior to initiation of 
construction. 
Local cooperation. A revised Supplemental Agreement with 
all work items remaining was coordinated in FY 93. Additional 
funding is needed prior to the District continuing design 
and construction on the canal. 
Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design work 
was performed for a total cost of $173,433. 
2. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN 
Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), 
formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, 
flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, IL, 
about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises 
Illinois River from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and 
Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles), Des Plaines River to Lockport 
(18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South 
Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). 
Also from a point 12.4 miles above Lockport, Ii, waterway 
comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and 
Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near entrance to Lake 
Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction 
to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and 
to Clark Street, Gary, IN (4.2 miles). 
Previous projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual 
Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. 
Existing project. See table 23-K and page 1255 of Annual 
Report for 1963. Cost of new work was $124,041,436 and includes 
$445,000 for Recreation Facilities under Code 711. 
Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferredfor-
restudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 
1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non Federal; is excluded 
from present cost estimate. See Table 23-B for 
authorizing legislation. 
(See Table 23-J through 23-N on existing locks and dams; 
lock and dam construction, foundations, cost; additional 
features entering into cost of project; existing project and total 
cost of existing project.) 
Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications 
and Part I of Calumet-Sag Modification. 
All pools above Alton Pool: 
Maintenance: Channel dredging by the government dredge 
AMERICA (St. Louis) and contract cutterhead pipeline 
dredge was performed in LaGrange, Peoria, Starved Rock 
and Marseilles at various locations at a cost of $1,555,500 
23-2

ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT 
with a total of 327,049 cubic yards of material being removed. 
Dredging inspection and reports were completed at a cost 
of $108,900. Strike removal and snagging and clearing was 
accomplished in various locations by hired labor at a cost of 
$284,200. Maintenance of the Lucas-Berg Disposal Facility 
cost $6,800. Structural repairs to locks and dams were performed 
by hired labor at a cost of $2,426,300. Repairs to 
Lockport Approach Dike, canal side was continued at a cost 
of $1,533,500. Starved Rock boiler replacement was completed 
at a cost of $18,800. Replace air compressors at Starved 
Rock was initiated at a cost of $89,000. Repair bulkheads at 
a cost of $150,000. Repair of Starved Rock lower long wall 
was continued at a cost of $58,000. Repair control station 
and roof at Brandon Road at a cost of $32,800, and install 
city water line at Peoria was completed at a cost of $60,100. 
Dredged material disposal activities and other environmental 
concerns in connection with dredging cost $2,900. Real 
Estate support of maintenance activities cost $58,600. 
Buildings, grounds, and utility maintenance at the locks and 
dams and Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria totaled 
$7,700. Environmental compliance work continued at a cost 
of $32,500. Replacement of data collection platform cost 
$13,900. Permanent operating equipment costs were $268,300. 
Engineering and design work cost $552,900 and supervision, 
administration, and inspection for the maintenance features 
totaled $511,200. As built drawing continued at a cost of 
$5,000. Total maintenance costs were $7,777,700. Net credits 
to the project were $2,900. 
Operation and Care: Operation of the locks and dams and 
routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were made at 
a cost of $7,625,400. Illinois Waterway Project Office at 
Peoria was continued at a cost of $728,700. Real Estate 
management services were provided at a cost of $64,900. 
Visitors' Center at Starved Rock Lock and Dam was operated 
at a cost of $253,200. OSHA inspections and medical examinations 
were accomplished at a cost of $21,300. Surveys, 
studies, and other inspections were performed at a cost of 
$1,057,600; natural and cultural resource costs were $79,100; 
water control management costs were $852,500; and the 
amount of $4,800 was expended on master plans. Supervision 
and administration for the operation features totaled 
$229,700. Total operation costs were $10,917,200. 
Rehabilitation: Major Rehabilitation continued on the Illinois 
Waterway, Four Locks for a cost of $11,141,732. Total 
costs incurred were $11,141,732. 
Illinois Waterway Pool Operation: Costs for the year were 
$35,508 for natural resource management; $131,248 for condition 
and operation studies; $97,947 for water control 
management, and $151,487 for supervision and administration. 
Total costs were $416,190. 
Illinois Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $558,599 
for dredging. Supervision and administration costs were 
$51,157. Total maintenance cost were $639,756. 
Total operation and maintenance costs for all pools above 
Alton Pool were $18,692,000. Rehabilitation costs were 
$11,141,732. Alton Pool operation and maintenance costs 
were $1,055,946. Total costs incurred $30,889,678. 
3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN 
MISSOURI RIVER AND 
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 
For report on this improvement, see chapter on "Mississippi 
River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN." 
4. UPPER MISSISSIPPI - ILLINOIS 
NAVIGATION STUDY 
Location. The study includes both the Upper Mississippi 
River and the Illinois Waterway. The study area covers over 
850 miles of navigable waterways and 29 locks and dams of 
the Upper Mississippi River from the headwaters at St. Anthony 
Falls near Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota; 
downstream to the mouth of the Ohio River at Cairo; and 
the Illinois Waterway (eight locks and dams) from Lake 
Michigan in Chicago, Illinois, southwest to where the waterway 
joins with the Mississippi River at Grafton, Illinois, 348 
miles long. The Upper Mississippi River system meanders 
through the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, 
and Missouri, and over 40 counties. The Illinois Waterway 
is located entirely within the State of Illinois. 
Existing project. The project consists of addressing the need 
for navigation improvement on the river system. Undertaken 
by three Corps Districts (St. Paul, Rock Island, and St. 
Louis), the purpose of the study is to examine information 
related to the existing condition of the structures and investigate 
system congestion (lockage delays, inadequate 
capacity, and recreation/commercial locking conflicts). The 
review of this completed project is authorized by Section 216, 
Flood Control Act of 1970, PL 91-611. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. The Feasibility Phase was 
continued during FY 1995 at a cost of $9,547,350. 
5. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM 
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
PROGRAM (UMRS-EMP), 
IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 
Location. The project is authorized for those river reaches 
having commercial navigation channels on the Upper 
Mississippi River, Illinois River, Minnesota River, St. Croix 
River, and Kaskaskia River in the states of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, 
Missouri, and Wisconsin. 
Existing project. The purpose of the UMRS-EMP as stated 
in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the coordinated 
development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River 
system, recognizing its several purposes. The program includes 
habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects to 
counteract the effects of backwater sedimentation. Long Term 
Resource Monitoring will provide the means for more informed 
management of the UMRS. Also authorized was a study 
of the economic impacts of completed recreation, completed 
navigation traffic monitoring, and recreation projects (currently 
unfunded). The program was initiated in 1986 utilizing 
funds provided by PL 99-88, FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriation 
Act. PL 99-662, Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986, further defined the program and provided for 
23-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
a 10 year implementiation period. The implementation period 
was extended to 15 years by PL 101-640, Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990. 
Local Cooperation: Local cooperation agreements are obtained 
for habitat projects for such projects not located on 
lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, within the meaning 
of Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. 
Operations During Fiscal Year. Costs during the year totaled 
$20,608,000. The majority of funds was expended on two 
primary program elements: habitat projects and long term 
resource monitoring. General design was initiated on one project 
and continued on 16 projects; construction was initiated 
on two projects, continued on nine projects, and completed 
on five projects. Construction has essentially been completed 
on a total of 20 projects since the program was initiated. Data 
analysis and production of technical and special reports continued 
by the Environmental Management Technical Center 
in Lake Onalaska, WI. 
6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION 
PROJECTS 
See Table 23-C 
Flood Control 
7. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA 
Location. Coralville Lake is formed by the Coralville Dam 
on the Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, 
Johnson County, IA, about 83 miles above the confluence 
of the Iowa River with the Mississippi River. 
Existing project. See page 28-4, Annual Report for 1981, 
for project details. Construction began in July 1949 and the 
project has been in operation since February 1958. About 
24,406 acres of land were acquired in fee and flowage 
easements obtained for 24,427 acres. The project was 
modified to provide for construction of a highway bridge 
crossing the lake at the Mehaffey site, which was begun in 
June 1964 and completed in October 1966. See Table 23-B 
for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. None required, except in connection 
with the Mehaffey Bridge which has been fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. No new work was performed 
during FY 95. Operation and Maintenance: Routine 
maintenance activities continued at a cost of $3,059,707. 
Reservoir maintenance and operation cost $142,500. Expenditures 
from return of recreation use fees were $17,583. 
8. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL 
RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA 
Location. The greenbelt area is located along both banks 
of the Des Moines River in central IA and extends from a 
point at which relocated U.S. Highway 92 crosses the Des 
. Moines River near Harvey, upstream approximately 169 river 
miles to U.S. Highway 20, and includes portions of Fort 
Dodge, IA. It also includes the Corps' operated Lake Red 
Rock and Saylorville Lake projects. 
Existing project. The project will include, but not be limited 
to: (1) the construction, operation, and maintenance of recreational 
facilities and streambank stabilization structures; (2) 
maintenance of all structures constructed before the date of 
authorization of this project (other than any such structure 
operated and maintained by any person under a permit or 
agreement with the Secretary); (3) such tree plantings, trails, 
vegetation, and wildlife protection and development for 
recreational purposes; and (4) the prohibition or limitation 
by the Secretary of the killing, wounding, or capturing at any 
time of any wild bird or animal in such areas as may be 
directed by the Secretary. In carrying out the project the 
Secretary may acquire by purchase, donation, exchange, or 
otherwise, land and interests therein, as the Secretary determines 
are necessary to complete the project. 
The authorization requires that an Advisory Committee be 
established for consultation with the Department of the 
Army consisting of 47 members: three Corps of Engineers 
appointees, one person from the city of Des Moines, and one 
from each other incorporated municipality within the 
greenbelt, two from each of the nine counties in the greenbelt, 
and five from the State of Iowa. See Table 23-B for authorizing 
legislation. 
Local Cooperation. Letters of assurance have been received 
for 14 separable elements. Local cooperation Agreements 
have been executed for five separable elements. 
Operations during fiscal year. Coordination was maintained 
with the Advisory Committee in accordance with Public Law 
99-88. Construction continued on the Red Rock Trails Segment 
IIB, IIIA, and IIIB and the Downtown Riverfront 
Plaza/Amphitheater. A construction contract was awarded 
for Red Rock Trails Segment IVA. Work was halted on the 
Feature Design Memoranda for Botanical Center Park; 
Johnston Trails/Canoe Access; Raccoon River Trail; Raccoon 
River Regional Park; Polk City - Big Creek Trail; Webster 
City - Briggs Wood Trail; Dayton - Stratford Trail, Knoxville 
- Segment Trail; Riverview Park; and Saylorville Barrier 
Dam Trail. Costs incurred were $1,528,222. 
9. FARM CREEK, IL 
Location. Farm Creek watershed in Tazewell County, IL, 
is 60 square miles in extent. Stream empties into Illinois 
Waterway at mile 162 above mouth. 
Existing project. See page 28-5, Annual Report for 1983 
for description of project. See Table 23-B for authorizing 
legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine 
maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $275,657. 
10. LOVES PARK, IL 
Location. The Loves Park project is located in Winnebago 
County, IL on the northeast boundary of the city of 
Rockford, IL. Loves Park is 17 miles south of the Illinois- 
Wisconsin state line. 
23-4

ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT 
Existing project. The project provides 100-year level of protection 
against flooding along Loves Park Creek. Protection 
measures consist of 17,900 feet of channel improvements, a 
16,300 GPM pump plant, and ponding. The estimated project 
cost is $29,000,000 including $10,700,000 non-federal 
costs. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation: The local cooperation agreement was 
executed on March 26, 1991. 
Operation during fiscal year. Planning, Engineering, and 
Design was continued to develop Plans and Specifications 
relative to Stage I. Construction was initiated on Stages IIA-2 
and IIB. Total costs incurred were $2,347,835. 
11. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED 
ROCK, IA 
Location. The site of this project is on the Des Moines 
River, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, 
Warren, and Polk Counties. The dam is 142.9 miles above 
the mouth of the Des Moines River, which empties into the 
Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above the mouth of the Ohio 
River. The city of Des Moines lies northwesterly from the site, 
about 60 miles upstream. 
Existing project. See page 28-6, Annual Report for 1981 
for description of the project. Construction began in May 
1960, and the dam was placed in beneficial use for storage 
of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for the project 
consisted of 50,326 acres in fee and 26,706 acres in 
flowage easement. Landowner complaints, that lake operation 
have flooded their lands more frequently than what they 
were told to expect when flowage easements were initially acquired, 
led Congress to modify the project authorization. 
Language in PL 99-190 authorizes acquisition from willing 
sellers fee simple title in real property, which is subject to 
periodic flooding in connection with the operation of the project. 
Potentially there are approximately 1,000 tracts consisting 
of about 30,000 acres. Estimated Federal cost is 
$43,500,000. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. 
Local Cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Land Acquisition 
costs were $900,952. The last REDM 5B was approved 
December 1992. Operation and maintenance activities were 
continued at a cost $4,671,960. Flood control reservoir 
maintenance and operation cost $142,500. Expenditures from 
the return of recreation use fees were $34,276. 
12. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA 
Location. The project site is chiefly in Polk County, IA, 
but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Counties. The dam 
is about 213.7 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River 
and about 5 miles upstream from the city of Des Moines, IA. 
Existing project. The dam is an earth embankment 6,750 
feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are 
a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located 
at the toe of the west bluff. Control structure is at upstream 
end ,f conduit and uses three gates. A stilling basin is provideo 
to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. 
Spillway is in west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing 
over the spillway weir discharges into a paved chute and 
thence into an excavated earth channel to the Des Moines 
River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth 
embankment secton, and flow over weir is uncontrolled when 
water in reservoir reaches its crest. Watershed area above dam 
site is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, 
lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 
acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control 
and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum 
flows at downstream points). Lake supplements capacity of 
downstream Lake Red Rock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes 
provide a high degree of flood protection to the lower Des- 
Moines River Valley. Reaches along the Mississippi River 
downstream from the mouth of the Des Moines River are also 
benefited. 
A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental 
effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream 
from the dam, was authorized in 1976. The project modification 
included relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition 
of additional park land, and the development of a floodway 
corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam 
downstream to Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Improvements 
to Highway 415, the main access road to existing facilities 
on the east side of the reservoir, were added to the project 
by Congress in 1984. Segments A and B of Highway 415 have 
been completed. Segment C of Highway 415 was completed 
in 1994. 
Construction began in June 1965, and the dam was placed 
in operation for the storage of flood water in April 1977. 
Remedial work in Big Creek Valley, consisting of diversion 
dam and channel and a barrier dam, for the protection of 
the town of Polk City was completed in December 1974. The 
land acquisition program involved 26,626 acres acquired in 
fee and flowage easements for 1,950 acres. The estimated project 
cost is $116,470,000 including $2,820,000 in non-Federal 
costs from the State of Iowa and the City of Des Moines, 
for recreational development. See Table 23-B for authorizing 
legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: continued on 
transferring project right-of-way to Iowa Department of 
Transportation, the project sponsor. Highway 415 construction 
contracts were completed for a gasoline relocation and 
intersection lighting. Planning, Engineering, and Design efforts 
continued on the 86th Street Imporvements and Extension 
project. This project will provide improved access to the 
western portion of Saylorville Lake. Costs incurred were 
$470,909. Operation and Maintenance activities were continued 
at a cost of $4,671,960. Reservoir maintenance and 
operation cost $142,500. Expenditures from the return of 
recreation use fees were $107,692. The project is about 97 percent 
completed, excluding deferred work. 
13. WEST DES MOINES, IA 
Location. The city is located in Polk County in central 
Iowa. 
Existing project. The project will provide flood protection 
from the Raccoon River and Walnut Creek. The project 
23-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
consists of four stages: Stage I, 3,100 feet of levees and floodwalls 
along Walnut Creek north of Ashworth Road; Stage 
II, 9,000 feet of levees along the Raccoon River from Jordan 
Creek to 63rd Street, with pump station; Stage IIIA, 4,500 
feet of levees along the lower end of Walnut Creek; and Stage 
IIIB, 5,800 feet of levees and flood walls tieing Stages I and 
IIlIA together along Walnut Creek with pump station and 
Stages II and liIA along the Raccoon river. The project will 
provide 100-year protection and will prevent 4.387 million 
dollars in average annual damages. See Table 23-B for 
authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction is 
continuing on Stage I and Stage IIIB. Total costs incurred 
during FY 95 were $4,147,502. 
14. MUSCATINE ISLAND, IA 
Location. Muscatine Island lies on the west bank of the 
Mississippi River in Muscatine and Louisa Counties, Iowa, 
adjacent and in the city of Muscatine, IA. The flood protection 
area of 30,800 acres is protected by 15.6 miles of existing 
sand and clay levees. The protected area consists of residential, 
commercial, industrial and agricultural areas and also 
includes U.S. Highway 61 and the Muscatine Municipal 
Airport. 
Existing Project. The existing levee will be raised to increase 
the level of protection from less than a 100-year flood to a 
200-year flood and associated closure and utility improvements. 
The 200-year protection level is achieved by improving 
and raising approximately 6.6 miles of the existing 
levee system. Also included in the project is construction of 
an upstream railroad closure structure, improving drainage 
facilities, concrete I-wall sections and relocating existing 
utilities. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. 
Local Cooperation. The city of Muscatine and Muscatine 
Island Levee District are co-sponsors for the project. The Project 
Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed on 21 
September 1995. 
Operations during fiscal year. The PCA document was 
drafted, coordinated through higher authority approvals and 
executed with the local co-sponsors. Right-of-way drawings 
for the Stage I construction work were developed and provided 
to the city. Preliminary Stage I and Stage II plan and 
specification work efforts were initiated. Total costs incurred 
during FY 95 were $143,342. 
15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Federal flood control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code 
of Federal Regulations) provide that the structures and 
facilities constructed by the United States for local flood protection 
shall be continuously maintained in such a manner 
and operated at such times and for such periods as may be 
necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Costs during the 
period for inspections of projects turned over to local interests 
to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were 
$234,016. (See Table 23-H for list of completed flood control 
projects inspected.) 
16. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
See Table 23-E. 
17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood Control Activities, Section 205, Public Law 84-685. 
See Table 23-I 
Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and 
Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public 
Law 83-780. See Table 23-I. 
Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood 
Control Act, Public Law 526.) See Table 23-1. 
Emergency Flood Control Activities, Public Law 99, 84th 
Congress. See Table 23-I. 
General Investigations 
18. SURVEYS 
There were two flood prevention studies in progress during 
FY 95 at a cost of $531,232. There was one restudy of 
deferred projects in progress in FY 95 at a cost of $71,772. 
There were two studies reviewed for deauthorization at a cost 
of $250,431. Environmental Services Partnerships, Special Investigations, 
FERC, Dam Safety Criteria Studies, Coordination 
Studies with Other Agencies, and Planning Assistance 
to States efforts totaled $118,125. Total cost of surveys was 
$971,560. 
19. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
BASIC DATA 
Flood plain management services cost $189,673. Sedimentation 
and streamgaging studies were completed during FY 
95 at a cost of $88,580. Total cost for collection and study 
of basic data was $278,253. 
20. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 
AND DESIGN 
The Green Bay Levee and Drainage District flood protection 
project was authorized by the Water Resources Development 
of 1986, deauthorized in November 1991, and 
reauthorized in Water Resources Development of 1992. The 
Levee and Drainage District is located along the Mississippi 
River downstream from the City of Burlington in Lee County, 
Iowa. The mainstream levee is located between approximate 
river miles 386 and 397. The 17.2 miles of existing levee 
was originally constructed by local interests and improved by 
the Corps of Engineers in 1948 and 1966. The existing levee 
provides an approximate 50-year level of protection with a 
2-feet-6 freeboard. Work was initiated on hte General 
Reevaluation Report (GRR). The GRR was the last document 
containing project formulation and economic justification in 
October 1979 feasibility report. The current estimated cost 
of PED $1,000,000. See Table 23-B for authorizing 
legislation. 
Total costs incurred during FY 95 for Green Bay Levee and 
Drainage District were $139,888. 
23-6

ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT 
TABLE 23-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project 
1. Illinois and 
Mississippi Canal, 
IL 
2. Illinois Waterway 
IL and IN 
4. Upper Mississippi 
-Illinois Navigation 
Study 
5. Upper Mississippi 
River System Environmental 
Management 
Program, IL, IA, MN, 
MO, WI 
7. Coralville Lake, IA 
8. Des Moines 
Recreational River 
and Greenbelt, IA 
9. Farm Creek, IL 
10. Loves Park, IL 
11. Red Rock Dam and 
Lake Red Rock, IA 
12. Saylorville Lake 
IA 
Funding 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed Funds: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed Funds: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed Funds: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed Funds: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed Funds: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed Funds: 
Approp. 
Cost 
FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 September 1995 
3,000,000 
2,979,556 
17,226,000 
16,749,997 
(30,000) 
106,434 
1,962,000 
1,596,549 
13,672,000 
15,476,800 
5,293 
2,727,600 
2,665,670 
750,000 
1,533,701 
20,025 
148,364 
214,000 
218,992 
370,307 
420,609 
698,111 
3,527,800 
3,388,964 
19,850 
18,422 
900,000 
6,866,504 
3,580,800 
3,458,691 
168,033 
39,426 
2,540 
14,384,000 
15,046,615 
653,000 
391,167 
3,340,000 
2,339,577 
17,590,000 
8,144,000 
2,549 
2,711,000 
2,594,568 
2,150,000 
1,187,262 
19,287 
206,000 
206,070 
1,408,000 
759,146 
279,000 
180,101 
811,000 
1,270,023 
3,090,000 
3,160,803 
450 
300,000 
3,015,678 
4,029,000 
4,029,262 
168,033 
275,612 
108,000 
15,807 
16,045,664 
15,218,077 
1,240,000 
258,113 
1,240,000 
257,136 
7,563,000 
7,180,365 
20,501,000 
14,914,000 
686,000 
593,905 
2,953,100 
2,867,986 
3,050,000 
1,549,024 
8,046 
279,000 
299,978 
1,447,048 
1,097,338 
91,666 
671,000 
1,029,347 
4,183,300 
3,710,461 
50,000 
339,070 
4,316,800 
4,015,295 
139,956 
238,592 
67,000 
173,433 
17,983,000 
18,692,026 
10,289,508 
11,141,732 
7,890,600 
9,547,350 
15,498,000 
20,608,000 
365,000 
348,821 
2,910,500 
3,059,707 
4,000,000 
1,528,222 
1,065,037 
709,118 
278,000 
275,657 
3,232,000 
2,347,835 
290,000 
292,049 
900,952 
4,223,500 
4,671,960 
450,000 
470,909 
3,375,082 
3,569,385 
33,821 
7,605,143' 
7,605,143' 
21,377,2482 
21,355,5852 
126,707,751' 
126,706,419' 
363,838,237' 
360,668,756' 
150,422,432 
148,780,708 
1,240,000 
257,136 
22,670,600 
22,479,086 
113,5574,000 
104,103,000 
1,051,000 
942,726 
30,179,488' 
30,173,702' 
46,650,274 
44,433,877 
13,646,000 
8,453,131 
1,457,849 
1,093,019 
9,859,0206 
9,859,020' 
4,396,541 
4,285,010 
7,073,355 
5,816,952 
569,000 
563,816 
99,720,484 
98,908,404 
49,930,487 
47,257,596 
19,850 
18,422 
128,027,887 
127,129,648' 
51,744,323 
48,364,948 
3,398,097 
2,938,577 
23-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 23-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 September 1995 
13. West Des Moines, IA New Work: 
Approp. 286,000 473,000 2,804,000 3,318,000 3,794,000 
Cost 315,473 383,472 1,917,397 4,147,502 7,892,422 
Contributed Funds: 
Approp. - - 779,000 945,000 1,724,000 
Cost - - 568,543 877,607 1,446,150 
14. Muscatine Island, IA New Work: 
Approp. 55,000 85,000 2,000 200,000 889,000 
Cost 69,159 52,731 34,309 143,196 832,049 
20. Green Bay L&DD, IA New Work: 
Approp. - - 245,000 71,000 316,000 
Cost - - 176,113 139,887 316,000 
1. Includes $25,000 Emergency Relief Funds. 
2. Includes $4,143,282 for Operating and Care under the "Permanent 
Indefinite Appropriation." 
3. Includes $2,569,102 for previous projects. 
4. Includes $1,028,468 for previous projects. 
TABLE 23-B 
See 
Section 
in Text 
5. Includes cost of Mehaffey Bridge, $1,365,074 (excluding $100,000 contributed 
funds). 
6. Excludes $161,813 contributed funds. 
7. Excludes $950,000 non-Federal cost. 
Date 
Authorizing 
Act Project and Work Authorized 
January 21, 1927 
July 3, 1930 
June 26, 1934' 
August 30, 1935 
August 30, 19353 
June 14, 1937 
June 20, 1938 
October 23, 1943 
ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN 
Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth 
of Illinois River to Utica, 231 miles, modification 
of 2 U.S. locks and dams, removal of 2 State 
dams. (Act authorized appropriation of not to exceed 
$3,500,000 for carrying on work.) 
Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, IL, to heads of 
present Federal projects on Chicago and Calumet 
Rivers 94.6 miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to 
turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means 
of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging 
begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with 
present plans of State for that work. Act adopting 
project authorized anpropriation of not to exceed 
$7,500,000 for or. ,ng on work. 
Operation and care of locks and dams provided for 
with funds from War Department appropriation for 
rivers and harbors. 
Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and 
Peoria and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide 
below Lockport, exact location and details of design 
of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of 
Engineers, and, for time being, that no change be 
made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois 
River by act of July 3, 1930. 
Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag 
Channel and authorized channel in Calumet-Sag 
route to turning basin 5, and dredging at entrance of 
Lake Calumet. 
Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment 
of bypassed section of Calumet River. 
Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. 
Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to 
seepage and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 69th Cong., 
1st sess., and S. Doc. 130, 
69th Cong., 1st sess. 
S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 
2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., 
2nd sess.2 
H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 
2nd sess. 
Rivers and I larbors Committee 
Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., 
2nd sess. 
23-8 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
2. 
Documents 
--' -- '

ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT 
TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See 
Section 
in Text 
Date 
Authorizing 
Act Project and Work Authorized 
March 2, 1945 
(Continued) 
July 24, 1946 
July 24, 1946 
July 17, 1953 
July 3, 1958 
August 18, 1968 
November 17, 1986 
Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and 
a usable depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 
feet wide with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand 
Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana 
Harbor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., 
East Chicago, IN. Construct in Little Calumet River 
a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. 
Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all 
obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag 
Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand 
Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to 
provide suitable clearance, except that no Federal 
funds shall be expended fior removal or alteration 
of Illinois Central RR bridge at mile 11.20 of Little 
Calumet River. 
Substitute following work for that authorized by act 
of March 2, 1945; replace emergency dam in Chicago 
Sanitary and Ship Canal; enlargement of t hat canal 
thence to Sag Junction and of Calumet Sag Channel 
to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 
9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet 
to 225 feet wide between Little Calumet River and 
junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide 
thence to Clark St., Gary, IN, with a turning basin at 
Clark St., enlarge Indiana harbor Canal to 225 feet 
wide and usable depth of 9 feet between Grand 
Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; 
remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control 
works in Calumet River near its head, and 
similar structures in proposed Grand Calumet 
Channel west of Indiana Harbor Canal; alter or eliminate 
railroad bridges across three channels lakeward 
of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct 
new railroad bridges to provide suitable 
clearance. 
A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, IL, by 
construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged to 
7 feet deep. 
$48,933 to reimburse Nutwood Drainage and Levee 
District for additional pumping operation; supplementing 
$58,750 authorized in October 1943 act. 
Federal participation in alteration of highway 
bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which 
constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in 
accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as 
amended. 
Federal participation in alteration of highway 
bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which 
constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, 
in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as 
amended. 
Illinois River at Peoria, IL modification of navigation 
project to include an adjacent downstream water 
area. 
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM 
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
PROGRAM, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 
23-9 
Documents 
H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 677, 79th Cong.. 
2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 698, 79th Cong., 
2nd sess. 
H. Doc. 144, 81st Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 
1st sess.4 
Specified in Act. Also 
IH. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Sec. 857, II.R.6, Water 
Resources Development 
Act of 1986.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
August 15, 1985 
(P.L. 99-88) 
November 17, 1986 
7. June 28, 1938 
July 14, 1960 
8. August 15, 1985 
(P.L. 99-88) 
November 17, 1986 
9. 1944 Flood Control 
Act 
10. November 17, 1986 
11. June 28, 1938 
December 19, 1985 
12. July 3, 1958 
October 22, 1976 
13. November 17, 1986 
19. November 17, 1986 
October 31, 1992 
Provide for a 10-year environmental program to 
include habitat rehabilitation and enhancement; longterm 
resource monitoring with computerized inventory 
and analysis; recreational development; assessment 
of economic benefits from recreational activities; 
and navigation system traffic monitotring. 
Approves 1982 Upper Mississippi River Master Plan, 
authorizes interstate agreements between Upper 
Mississippi River states, directs Secretary to implement 
GREAT II recommendations for disposal of 
dredged material and facilitate the productive use of 
dredge material, directs and interagency agreement 
with the Department of Interior for its participation in 
the plan, authorizes second lock at Lock and Dam No. 6. 
CORALVILLE LAKE, IA 
Reservoir for flood control and recreation. 
Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the 
Mehaffey site. 
DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND 
GREENBELT, IA 
Recreational development; environmental enhancement; 
and related streambank stabilization. 
Defines area of work. 
FARM CREEK, IL 
Two flood detention dams and channel improvements. 
LOVES PARK, IL 
Improved channel, pumping plant and pond storage. 
RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA 
Reservoir for flood control and recreation. 
Land Acquisition 
SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA 
Reservoir for flood control and recreation. 
Modification to minimize adverse project impact on 
Ledges State Park. 
WEST DES MOINES, IA 
Construct levees and floodwall. 
MUSCATINE ISLAND LEVEE DISTRICT 
AND MUSCATINE-LOUISA COUNTY 
DRAINAGE DISTRICT, NO.13, IA 
Raise existing levees 
GREEN BAY LEVEE AND DRAINAGE 
DISTRICT, IA 
Raise existing levees 
H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Sec. 1103, H.R.6, Water 
Resources Development 
Act of 1986. 
Flood Control Committee 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 
None 
H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Sec. 604, H.R.6, Water 
Resources Development 
Act of 1986. 
H. Doc. 802, 78th Cong., 
2nd sess. 
Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water 
Resources Development 
Act of 1986. 
Flood Control Committee 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 
PL 99-190 
S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., 
2nd sess. 
Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water 
Resources Development 
Act of 1986 
Sec. 401, H.R.6, 
Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986. 
Sec. 200(j) 
Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992. 
23-10 
1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act 
2. Contains latest published map of Illinois and Des Plaines Rivers. 
3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administratiove Program October 31, 1934, and February 28, 1935. 
4. Contains lataest published maps of Calumet - Sy portion.

ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT 
TABLE 23-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
(See Section 6 of Text) 
Cost To September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Hannibal SBH, MO Completed 1958 $ 108,700' $130,319 
Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL Completed 1967 70,979' 9,345 
Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL Completed 1985 265,4993 171,000 
Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel Completed 1970 35,4772 37,700 
Muscatine Harbor, IA Completed 1964 353,000 340,061 
1. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $137,869 contributed funds. 
2. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $20,300 contributed funds. 
TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 16 of Text) 
Cost To September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report Operation Contributed 
See Annual and Funds 
Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended 
Completed Projects 
Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL 
Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, MO) 
Bettendorf, IA 
Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Canton, MO' 
Clinton, IA 
Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District 
No. 1, MO 
Des Moines, IA 
Drury Drainage District, IL 
D~ibuque, IA 
East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 
1943 
1962 
1987 
1943 
1964 
1991 
1954 
1941 
1969 
1972 
1964 
1974 
1941 
$ 247,822 
1,679,056 
14,930,085 
144,910 
1,496,555 
26,237,690 
1,923,145 
68,898 
1,492,016 
4,993,224 
1,144,875 
10,861,170 
207,826 
- 
$ 228,073 
839,615 
23,323 
145,415 
23-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(Continued) (See Section 16 of Text)
Cost To September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report Operation Contributed 
See Annual and Funds 
Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended 
Completed Projects 
East Moline, IL 1984 9,692,097 - - 
East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL 1946 279,963 - - 
Elkport, IA 1951 34,200 - - 
Evansdale, IA 1983 4,409,088 - - 
Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1941 60,500 - - 
Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1963 1,621,841 - - 
Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL 1942 155,562 - - 
Fulton, IL 1984 18,017,200 - - 
Galena, IL 1952 844,100 - 118,000 
Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1949 299,000 - - 
Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1967 1,727,711 - - 
Gregory Drainage District, MO 1940 77,100 - - 
Gregory Drainage District, MO 1972 1,538,963 - 20,626 
Hannibal, MO 1993 6,036,318 - 600,000 
Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL 1968 1,453,217 - - 
Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL 1968 1,043,902 - - 
Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL 1949 42,700 - - 
Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 109,593 - - 
Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage 
District, IL 1972 4,772,498 - - 
Indian Grave Drainage District, IL 1972 3,551,961 - - 
Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA 1972 6,044,693 - - 
Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL' 1957 123,300 - - 
Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton 
Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,290,000 - - 
Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 117,731 - - 
Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1938 152,000 -- 
Marengo, IA' 1981 2,447,001 - - 
Marion County Drainage District, MO 1967 873,748 - - 
Marshalltown, IA 1978 8,437,511 - 252,136 
Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL 1940 93,808 - - 
Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL' 1977 1,995,322 - 269,739 
Milan, IL 1988 13,437,663 - 213,554 
Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA' 1983 1,129,800 -- 
Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine- 
Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, IA 1970 3,293,276 - 220,000 
Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL 1941 - - - 
Oakford Special Drainage District, IL 1940 38,417 - - 
Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN' 1957 72,432 - - 
Ottumwa, IA 1977 233,145 - - 
Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee 
District, IL 1955 158,383 - - 
Penny Slough, Rock River, IL 1940 85,800 - - 
Rock Island, IL 1979 7,582,373 - - 
Rockford, IL 1989 10,032,496 - 514,188 
Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 108,797 - - 
Sabula, IA 1958 411,915 - - 
Sangamon River (Mouth), IL 1980 1,048,990 272,848 15,122 
Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL 1945 32,281 - - 
Sid Simpson Project, IL 1968 5,789,800 - - 
Sny Basin, IL 1972 14,003,560 - - 
Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1942 61,400 - - 
Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1968 4,956,749 - - 
23-12

ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT 
TABLE 23-E 
(Continued) 
OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 16 of Text)
Cost To September 30, 1995 
For Last 
Full Report Operation Contributed 
See Annual and Funds 
Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended 
South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and 
Levee District, IL 1942 220,729 -- 
South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 171,839 - - 
South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 61,200 -- 
South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1968 1,231,243 -- 
South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1991 7,204,952 - 2,056,960 
South River Drainage District, MO 1941 55,300 - - 
South River Drainage District, MO 1966 1,106,056 -- 
Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 185,980 -- 
Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay 
Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL 1967 3,306,695 - - 
Union Township Drainage District, MO 1947 116,576 -- 
Van Meter, IA' 1965 113,842 - - 
Waterloo, IA 1987 48,620,099 - 83,300 
Waterloo Bridges, IA 1991 1,125,000 - 1,108,787 
Authorized Projects Not Constructed 
Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA 1987 1,400,800 --- 
Davenport, IA 1987 - - 
Moline, IL 2 1987 - - 
Peoria, IL 1973 534,580 -- 
Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL 1984 858,000 -- 
1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act). 
2. FY 89 funds of $5,639 were expended to close out project. 
TABLE 23-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual DI)ate Funds Funds 
Project Report For I)eauthorized Expended Expended 
Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II 
Illinois Waterway, IL and IN 
Campbells Island 
Mississippi River, IL 
Carroll County Levee 
and Drainage District, IL 
Central City Lake, 
Wapsipinicon River, IA 
Farmers Drainage and Levee 
District (Sangamon River), IL 
Green Island Levee and 
Drainage District, IA 
Henderson River, IL 
Illinois Waterway, IL and IN 
Duplicate Locks 
Illinois Waterway 
Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) 
Janesville and Indian 
Ford Dams, WI 
1986 
1969 
1938 
1970 
1942 
1938 
1964 
1982 
1986 
1938 
1986 
1979 
1977 
1977 
1986 
1977 
1977 
1981 
1986 
1977 
$ 76,664 
55,664 
102,310 
1.02,310 
23-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 23-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Date Funds Funds 
Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Keithsburg Drainage 
District, IL 1938 1977 - - 
Pecatonica River at 
Darlington, WI - 1977 - - 
Rochester Lake, 
Cedar River, IA - 1977 - - 
South Beloit, IL 1979 1986 270,000- 
William L. Springer Lake 
Decatur, IL 1979 1986 - - 
Illinois Waterway, 
Marseilles Canal, IL 1989 1990 - - 
Peoria Levees, IL - 1990 - - 
TABLE 23-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 15 of Text) 
Date 
Project Inspected 
Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL 
Banner Special Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Bear Creek Reservoir, Hannibal, MO 
Bettendorf, IA 
Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Burlington, IA 
Canton, MO 
Clinton, IA 
Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 
DeKalb, IL 
Des Moines, IA 
Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO 
Drury Drainage District, IL 
Dubuque, IA 
East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 
East Moline, IL 
East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL 
East Peoria Sanitary District, IL 
Elkport, IA 
Evansdale, IA 
Fabius River Drainage District, MO 
Farmers Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Fulton, IL 
Galena, IL 
Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 
Gregory Drainage District, MO 
Hannibal, MO 
Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL 
Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL 
Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Herget Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Hunt Drainage District & Lima Lake Drainage District, IL 
Indian Grave Drainage District, IL 
October 1994 
February 1995 
April 1994 
October 1994 
January 1995 
December 1994 
October 1993 
November 1994 
February 1995 
February 1995 
October 1994 
October 1995 
February 1993 
December 1994 
November 1994 
February 1995 
October 1994 
March 1995 
June 1995 
November 1994 
October 1993 
December 1994 
January 1995 
November 1994 
November 1994 
December 1994 
February 1993 
November 1993 
February 1993 
February 1993 
March 1995 
March 1995 
February 1993 
February 1993 
23-14

ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT 
TABLE 23-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(Continued) (See Section 15 of Text) 
Date 
Project Inspected 
Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA 
Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA 
Marengo, IA 
Marion County Drainage District, MO 
Marshalltown, IA 
Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL 
Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL 
Milan, IL 
Muscatine Island, L&DD, & Louisa DD No. 13, IA 
Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Rock Island, IL 
Sabula, IA 
Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL 
Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 
South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL 
South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 
South River Drainage District, MO 
Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage District Union No. 1 
and Bay Island Levee and Drainage District No. 1, IL 
The Sny Basin, IL 
Valley Drainage and Levee District IL 
Van Meter, IA 
Volga, IA 
Waterloo, IA 
West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL 
Worthington, MN 
December 1992 
January 1995 
January 1995 
January 1995 
February 1995 
February 1995 
November 1993 
December 1994 
February 1993 
December 1994 
March 1995 
October 1993 
October 1994 
December 1994 
March 1995 
April 1995 
October 1994 
October 1994 
September 1994 
February 1995 
January 1995 
June 1993 
January 1995 
March 1995 
February 1993 
February 1995 
December 1994 
June 1993 
February 1995 
October 1995 
December 1994 
May 1995 
January 1995 
September 1995 
TABLE 23-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 
858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) 
(See Section 17 of Text) 
Study Identification 
Cedar River, Cedar River City, IA 
East Peoria, IL 
Illinois River, Liverpool, IL 
Fiscal Year Costs 
$ 175,905 
52,804 
43,218 
23-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 23-I 
(Continued) 
FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 
858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) 
(See Section 17 of Text) 
Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs 
Minnow Branch, Hannibal, MO $ 477 
Oelwein, Fayette County, IA 64,763 
Ottawa, IL 42,908 
Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA 1,586,650 
Stevens Creek, Village of Forsyth, IL 29,044 
Tama, IA 180,755 
TABLE 23-I Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and 
Tributaries in the Interest of Flood Control (Preauthorization) 
(Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) 
(See Section 17 of Text) 
Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs 
NONE 
TABLE 23-I Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of 
the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) 
(See Section 17 of Text) 
Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs 
Clayton County Bridge, Osterdock, IA $ 38 
Fox River, Bridge Site #7, Davis Co., IA 43,002 
Highway 23/14, Jackson County, MN 7,932 
Highway 23/8, Jackson County, MN 59,778 
Mazon River, Goose Lake, Grundy County, IL 19,226 
MS Riverview St., Bellevue, IA 10,583 
South Raccoon River, Dexter, IA 58,997 
West Fork, Des Moines River, MN 55,871 
23-16

ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT 
TABLE 23-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
(Continued) Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and 
Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation) 
(See Section 17 of Text) 
Project and Location Federal Cost 
Advance Preparation: $ 242,868 
Emergency Operations: 294,301 
Rehabilitation: 6,289,337 
Flood Control of '93 
Rehabilitation: 3,033,797 
O&M Emergency Supplement: 3,741,094 
TABLE 23-J ILLINOIS WATERWAY: 
EXISTING LOCKS AND DAMS 
(See Section 2 of Text) 
Depth on 
Dimensions Miter Sills 
at Low Water 
Available Lift at 
Miles Width of Length for Low 
Above Chamber Full Width Water' Lower Upper 
Lock Mouth Miles to Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) 
l(Grange Iock 80.2 7.8 below lleardstown, IL 110 600 10.0 13.0 15.5 
Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, IL 110 600 11.0 12.0 15.5 
Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Utica, IL 110 600 18.5 14.0 16.8 
Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 600 24.45 14.0 18.6 
Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Morris, IL 110 600 21.75 12.25 16.85 
Brandon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, IL 110 600 34.0 13.8 17.85 
Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 30.5-39.52 15.0 11.0-20.0' 
T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1,000 - 14.0 14.0 
1. Lifts and depth on nliter sills are those obtained with 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at 
flat pools. Lockport is d(lue to fluctuation of water surface in the sanitary 
district canal. 
TABLE 23-K ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN 
LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST 
(See Section 2 of Text) 
Lock Dam Estimated 
Federal Cost 
Under 
Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing 
Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project 
Illinois River, $ 2,733,499' 
mouth to Utica; 
channel improvement 
by dredging 
in Illinois River 
below Starved Rock 
modification of two 
U.S. locks and 
dams, and removal 
of two State dams. 
23-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 23-K 
(Continued) 
ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN 
LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST 
(See Section 2 of Text) 
Lock Dam Estimated 
Federal Cost 
Under 
Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing 
Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project 
Concrete Piles in sand 
Concrete Piles in sand 
Starved Rock 
Marseilles 
Dresden Island 
Brandon Road 
Liockport 
T''.J. O'Brien 
Lock and dam 
equipment 
''otal locks 
and dams 
Concrete Rock 
Concrete Rock 
Concrete Rock 
Concrete Rock 
Concrete Rock 
Concrete 
and sheet 
piling 
Piles in clay Fixed 
1,250,304' 
- $ 24,471,832 
1. Actual cost. 
TABLE 23-L ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN 
ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST 
(See Section 2 of Text) 
Dredging: 
Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers 
Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places 
Starved Rock to Lockport 
Starved Rock to Grafton 
Calumet-Sag Channel 
Peoria small boat harbor 
$ 2,135,358' 
813,318' 
6,007,335 
2,917,607 
19,238,200 
24,937' 
23-18 
LaGrange 
Peoria 
Movable 
(wicket 
with Aframe-
crest) 
Movable 
(wicket 
type) 
Movable 
(tainter 
gates) 
Movable 
(tainter 
gates) 
Movable 
(tainter 
gates) 
Movable 
(tainter 
gates) 
Movable 
(Bear trap) 
(Bear trap) 
Concrete 
and timber 
Concrete 
and timber 
Concrete 
and 
structural 
steel 
Concrete 
and 
structural 
steel 
Concrete 
and 
structural 
steel 
Concrete 
and 
structural 
steel 
Concrete 
and 
structural 
steel 
Concrete 
and sheet 
piling 
Piles in sand 
Piles in sand 
Rock 
Rock 
Rock 
Rock 
Rock 
Piles in clay 
1939 
1939 
1933 
1933 
1933 
1933 
1933 
1960 
$ 2.744,592' 
3,381,030' 
885,315' 
1,853,725' 
2,503,376' 
2,031,683' 
1313,608' 
6,954,700'

ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT 
'ITA BLE 23-L 
(Continued) 
ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN 
ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST 
(See Section 2 of Text) 
Protection piers at all locks 
Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design 
Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration 
Rebuild highway bridges 
Rebuild railway bridges: 
Calumet-Sag Channel 
Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers 
Recreation Facilities, Code 711 
Removal of Blue Island lock 
Grand Calumet River controlling works 2 
St. Louis District 
Total additional features 
Total existing project 
1. Actual cost. 
TABLE 23-M 
77,613' 
5,141,474 
5,466,804 
19,327,850 
20,828,435' 
18,362,041' 
445,000 
288,600' 
1,081,600' 
$100,442,142 
$124,913,974 
2. Placed in inactive status November 19, 1974. 
EXISTING PROJECT 
See 
Section 
in Text Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) 
2. Illinois Waterway, Nine locks and six dams - - - 
IL and IN 
Grafton to Lockport, IL 291.1 miles 300 9 
Lockport to controlling works 2.0 miles 200-300 9 
Controlling works to junction with 10.0 miles 225 9 
Calumet-Sag Channel 
Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue 16.0 miles 225 9 
Island 
Calumet and Little Calumet Channel, 7.7 miles 300 9 
from Blue Island to turning basin 5 
Grand Calumet River Channel from 9.0 miles 9- 
junction with Little Calumet River 
to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 
141st, East Chicago, IN 
Also, Grand Calumet River Channel 4.2 miles 160 9 
from junction of Indiana Harbor 
Canal and Grand Calumet River to 
Clark St. in Gary, IN, with a turning 
basin at Clark St. 
A channel in Chicago Sanitary and 22.1 miles 175-300 9 
Ship Canal and South Branch 
Chicago River from Sag-Junction to 
Lake St. in Chicago, IL 
23-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 23-N ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN 
TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT 
TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
(See Section 2 of Text) 
New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total 
Regular Funds $120,886,748 $363,208,644 $148,393,588 $632,488,980 
Public Works Funds 3,960,735 - - 3,960,735 
Emergency Relief Funds 1,858,936 - - 1,858,936 
Total $126,706,419 $363,208,644 $148,393,588 $638,308,651' 
1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 on the of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 
operation and care of the works of improvement under the provisions
23-20

ST. PAUL, MN DISTRICT *
District comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, 
northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of 
northeastern South Dakota and northern and northeastern Iowa 
embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries 
from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River; Red 
River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of 
Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake 
of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi 
River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River 
between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. Minnesota River, MN ................... 24-2 
2. Mississippi River between Missouri River 
and Minneapolis, MN .................. 24-2 
3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi 
River, MN .......................... 24-2 
4. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental 
Management Program (UMRS-EMP)........ 24-3 
5. Warroad Harbor and River, MN .......... 24-3 
6. Zipple Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN. . . 24-4 
Beach Erosion Control 
7. St. Croix River, Stillwater, MN ........... 24-4 
Flood Control 
8. Bassett Creek, MN.................... 24-4 
9. Big Fork River, MN ................... 24-5 
10. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN 
andSD .......................... 24-6 
11. Chaska, MN ....................... 24-6 
12. EauGalleRiver, WI ................... 24-6 
13. Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN ............ 24-7 
14. Homme Lake and Dam, ND ............. 24-7 
15. Houston, MN ...................... 24-8 
16. Lac qui Parle Lakes, Minnesota River, MN .... 24-9 
17. La Farge Lake and Channel Improvement, WI . . 24-9 
18. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, 
Sheyenne River, ND .................. 24-10 
19. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, 
SD and MN ........................ 24-10 
20. Mankato and North Mankato, MN ........ 24-11 
21. Marshall, MN ....................... 24-11 
22. Minnesota River, Belgrade Township, MN . . . 24-11 
23. Minnesota River at Henderson, MN ....... 24-11 
24. Portage, WI ...................... 24-12 
25. Red Lake River, MN including Clearwater 
River, MN........................ 24-12 
26. Red Lake River, Polk County, Crookston .... 24-13 
27. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, 
MN, SD, and ND .................. 24-13 
28. Rochester, MN ...................... 24-14 
29. Roseau River, MN ................... 24-14 
30. Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI ........... 24-15 
31. Sheyenne River, ND.................. 24-15 
32. Snake River at Alvarado, MN ............. 24-16 
Page 
33. Sogn, MN ........................ 24-16 
34. Souris River, Basin, ND ................ 24-17 
35. State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI ......... 24-18 
36. Sterling Center, Maple River, MN .......... 24-18 
37. St. Hilaire, Riverside Cemetery, MN ........ 24-18 
38. St. Paul, MN ........................ 24-19 
39. Wabasha County, County Hwy 11, MN ...... 24-19 
40. Wild Rice River, Hendrum/Lee Townships, 
Norman County, MN .................. 24-19 
41. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects . 24-20 
Miscellaneous 
42. Other Work Under Special Authority ........ 24-20 
43. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies 
(FC &CE) ........................ 24-20 
44. National Emergency Preparedness (NEPP) ..... 24-20 
45. Regulatory Functions Program ............ 24-20 
General Investigations 
46. Surveys .................. 
47. Collection and Study of Basic Data . 
48. Advance Engineering and Design . . 
........ 24-20 
........ 24-20 
........ 24-20 
Tables 
Table 24-A Cost and Financial Statement ........ 24-21 
Table 24-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 24-25 
Table 24-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .. 24-26 
Table 24-D Not Applicable 
Table 24-E Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects ............... 24-27 
Table 24-F Not Applicable 
Table 24-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 24-29 
Table 24-H Reservoirs at Headwaters of 
Mississippi River ............... 24-30 
Table 24-I Red River of the North Drainage 
Basin: Active Units in 
Comprehensive Basin Plan ......... 24-31 
Table 24-J Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects ............... 24-32 
Table 24-K Flood Control Work Under 
Special Authorization ............ 24-33 
Table 24-L Project Modifications for Improvement 
of Environment ................ 24-34 
Table 24-M General Investigations ............ 24-35 
24-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Navigation 
1. MINNESOTA RIVER, MN 
Location. Rises in Big Stone Lake, MN and SD, and 
flows southeasterly about 224 miles to Mankato, MN, thence 
northeasterly about 106 miles to join the Mississippi River 
opposite St. Paul, MN. (For general location see Geological 
Survey map of Minnesota.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1890 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1105 of Annual Report 
for 1938. 
Existing project. Provides 9-foot depth below flat 
pool level of Mississippi River lock and dam 2 from mouth 
to mile 14.7, one-half mile above the railway bridge at 
Savage, MN, and 4-foot depth from mile 14.7 to 25.6 at 
Shakopee, MN. For details see page 1018 of Annual Report 
for 1965. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See also 
page 1074 of Annual Report for 1967. 
Terminal facilities. There are privately-owned 
terminals at miles 9, 13.1, 14.5, and two at mile 14.7. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Snagging and clearing cost $2,275 by contract. Land 
acquisition and supervision and inspection cost $511 and 
$179, respectively. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on project for 
4-foot depth was completed in 1931. The United States 
owns 10 acres of land in fee 2 miles east of Savage, MN, 
and easements on 123.08 acres of land. 46.20 acres have 
been transferred from the Department of the Army and 
Department of the Air Force to the project. Navigation from 
mouth to Shakopee was practicable for drafts not in excess 
of 3 feet. A contract for work under 1958 authorization for 
a 9-foot channel started in May 1966 and was terminated in 
January 1967 when 56 percent complete. A channel 
dredging contract awarded in June 1967 was completed in 
August 1968. Total costs for existing project to September 
30, 1995, were $4,743,183 of which $1,940,180 was for 
new work and $2,803,003 for maintenance. In addition, cost 
from contributed funds was $139,671 for dredging to 9-foot 
depth under provisions of Section 4, River and Harbor Act 
of 1915, and $219,531 for work done for the State of 
Minnesota relative to modification of the project. 
2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN 
MISSOURI RIVER AND 
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 
For report on this improvement see chapter on 
Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, 
Minnesota. 
3. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN 
Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and 
several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, 
Cass and Crow Wing Counties, MN. (See Table 24-H on 
reservoirs.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1888 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1098 of Annual Report 
for 1938. 
Existing project. Provides for reconstruction from 
timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, 
Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and 
construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was 
built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A 
portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was 
replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at 
Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 
16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet 
long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a 
depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was 
converted to use as a spillway. (See Table 24-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. None. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Reservoirs 
were operated as required, recreation facilities and equipment 
maintained, and surveys, repairs, and reports were made by 
hired labor at a cost of $1,541,040 and $668,613 by 
contract. Periodic inspection and dam safety costs were 
$73,887 by hired labor and $2 by other Corps. A dike at 
Sandy Lake cost $304,105 by contract. Cultural resource 
management cost $11,604 by hired labor and $34,382 by 
contract. Environmental review cost $8,759. Hired labor 
for a toe drain at Pine River cost $2,163 and a construction 
contract, $112,577. Data collection cost $74,474 by hired 
24-2

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
labor, $2,228 by contract and $22,305 by U. S. Geological 
Survey. Water quality and water control analysis cost 
$24,044 and $84,048, respectively. Real estate was 
managed at a cost of $85,612. There was a credit for 
$-4,036 for lands and damages by contract and costs of 
$31,483 by hired labor. Supervision and inspection costs 
were $230,403 by hired labor and $17,541 by contract. 
Other miscellaneous costs were $11. Miscellaneous 
engineering and design cost $76,701 by hired labor and 
$1,269 by contract. Dam Safety: Engineering and design 
cost $12,901 by hired labor. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was 
completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all 
lands affected by construction, maintenance, and operation 
of reservoirs. A total of 1,672.26 acres in fee are owned by 
the United States. The United States has easements, flowage 
rights, and other rights of use on another 296,334.44 acres. 
Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for 
public use are being constructed intermittently at all reservoir 
areas. (See Table 24-H for capacities and costs by 
reservoir.) 
4. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM 
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
PROGRAM (UMRS-EMP) 
Location. The program is authorized for the 
commercially navigable portions of the Upper Mississippi 
River System. In the St. Paul District, this includes the 
Mississippi, Minnesota, Black, and St. Croix Rivers in the 
states of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa. 
Existing project. The purpose of the UMRS-EMP as 
stated in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the 
coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper 
Mississippi River System, recognizing its several purposes. 
It is intended to protect and/or enhance the river resources 
and guide future river management. The primary emphasis 
of the program is on habitat rehabilitation and enhancement 
projects. Long term resource monitoring will provide the 
means for more informed management of the UMRS. Also 
authorized, was a study of the economic impacts of 
recreation, navigation traffic monitoring, and recreation 
projects (currently unfunded). The program was initiated in 
FY 1986 utilizing funds provided by the FY 1985 
Supplemental Appropriations Act. The execution of the 
program is being closely coordinated with the Upper 
Mississippi River Basin Association, the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, and the three affected states in the St. Paul 
District. See Rock Island District Tables 23-A and 23-B for 
total program costs and authorizing legislation. 
In the St. Paul District, eleven habitat projects have 
been completed. These are the Guttenberg Waterfowl Ponds 
(IA), Island 42 (MN), Lake Onalaska (WI), Blackhawk Park 
(WI), Pool 8 Islands (WI), Indian Slough (WI), Finger Lakes 
(MN), Lansing Big Lake (IA), Cold Springs (WI), Pool 9 
Islands (WI), and Spring Lake Peninsula (WI). The projects 
are being operated and maintained by the U. S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, except for Blackhawk Park which is 
managed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 
Through FY 1995, funds expended for the St. Paul District 
have amounted to $18,426,000 for planning, design, and 
construction and monitoring of habitat rehabilitation and 
enhancement projects, $443,000 for long term resource 
monitoring, $768,000 for economic impacts of recreation 
study, and $1,306,000 for program management. Baseline 
monitoring, project evaluation and biological monitoring 
cost $253,000, $312,000, and $855,000, respectively. The 
allocations for the overall program projected over a 15-year 
period for the St. Paul District are almost $60 million. 
Local cooperation. Local cooperation agreements are 
obtained for habitat projects for such projects not located on 
lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, within the 
meaning of Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. 
Operations during fiscal year. In the St. Paul 
District, costs during the year totaled $4,415,173 Federal and 
$17,390 non-Federal. The majority of funds were expended 
on the planning, design, construction and monitoring of 
habitat projects. Design was initiated on four projects and 
continued on six; construction was initiated on four projects, 
continued on two, and was completed on two projects. 
5. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MN 
Location. At Southwestern extremity of Lake of the 
Woods, 36 miles west of mouth of Rainy River. (See 
NOAA Nautical chart 14999.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep 
from landing at Warroad to deep water in lake, channel 
being 9,200 feet long, 200 feet wide within harbor, and 300 
feet wide out in lake; for a turning basin 500 by 900 feet to 
a depth of 8 feet; and for a pile-brush stone jetty on north 
side of channel extending from shore 700 feet into the lake. 
For additional details see page 1027 of Annual Report of 
1965. Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning 
basin to complete project width and depth was considered 
unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements, and 
classified inactive was deauthorized on August 5, 1977, 
under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. (See Table 24-B for 
authorization legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. There is one publicly owned 
wharf. There are two commercial fish wharves, one of 
which is served by a spur track, and a number of minor 
24-3

REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Engineering and design cost $1,604. Supervision 
and inspection costs were $475. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 
Prospective jetty completed in 1910 and reconstructed as a 
rubble mound in 1929 is in good condition. Turning basin 
at Warroad wharves was completed in 1911, and a channel 
200 feet wide and 8 feet deep in 1915. Controlling depth in 
river channel and lake approach channel was 6 feet below 
low-water datum for a minimum width of 100 feet. A 
walkway on the jetty is provided for public use. Portions of 
a revetment wall, constructed under Section 2 of Public Law 
269, 69th Congress, in accordance with Article VIII of the 
Lake of the Woods Treaty, were repaired in 1994. 
6. ZIPPEL BAY, LAKE OF THE WOODS 
COUNTY, MN 
Location. Zippel Bay is a natural harbor located in 
northwestern Minnesota on the south shore of Lake of the 
Woods near Williams, Minnesota. The navigation project is 
located in Zippel Bay State Park. 
Existing Project. Boats based at a state park, resort, 
marina, and a number of private residences use Zippel Bay 
to provide access to the lake. However, the natural channel 
between the bay and Lake of the Woods varied in depth and 
width and restricted navigation. The plan of improvement 
provides a small-boat access channel 50-70 feet wide and 
approximately 1,800 feet long between Zippel Bay and Lake 
of the Woods. Jetties have been constructed on both sides of 
the channel to minimize the amount of maintenance 
dredging. The project was approved by the Chief of 
Engineers for construction in October 1985 under the 
authority contained in Section 107 of the Rivers and Harbors 
Act of 1960, as amended. 
Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: 
Channel dredging cost $24,939 by contract. 
Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction of the 
small boat navigation project is completed. Responsibility 
for the project was transferred to the local sponsor, the State 
of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, in July 
1988. 
Beach Erosion Control 
7. ST. CROIX RIVER, 
STILLWATER, MN 
Location. In Washington County in eastern Minnesota 
along the St. Croix River about 18 miles northeast of St. 
Paul, Minnesota. (For general location, see Geological 
survey map of Minnesota.) 
Existing project. The proposed plan provides for 
repair of the existing 1000-foot retaining wall system, 
constructIon of a 1300-foot extension to the wall and 
expansion of the wall system to include a new secondary 
landward seepage wall to aid in flood protection for the 
downtown area. Estimated Federal cost for new work is 
$2,400,000 and $800,000 is to be contributed by local 
interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-580.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required to 
provide the entire costs of lands, easements, and rights-ofway 
necessary for construction of the project and make a 
cash contribution to increase their share to 25 percent of total 
project costs for flood control. By letter dated March 23, 
1993, the city of Stillwater indicated a willingness and 
intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation for 
flood control. Formal assurances will be requested prior to 
initiation of construction. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was 
continued at a cost of $489,875. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. 
engineering and design is in progress. 
Preconstruction 
Flood Control 
8. BASSETT CREEK, MN 
Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, 
Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi 
River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of 
Minnesota.) 
Existing project. The project consists of nonstructural 
and structural flood control measures. Nonstructural 
measures include continuation of existing floodplain 
regulations, flood insurance and forecasting, and flood 
24-4

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
warning. Principal structural measures consist of six small 
control structures in the upper watershed to temporarily 
impound floodwaters and a new tunnel (part of which was 
constructed on a cooperative basis with the Minnesota 
Department of Transportation) in a highly urbanized area of 
Minneapolis to replace the existing tunnel outletting Bassett 
Creek to the Mississippi River. Also included in the project 
are a limited reach of channel widening, bridge removals, 
culvert replacements, a weir structure, a flood storage area, 
and a railroad bridge replacement. Estimated Federal cost 
(1995) for new work is $29,339,000 and $11,361,000 is to 
be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by 
the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for 
requirements. Under current cost sharing policies, when the 
costs of lands, easements, rights- of-way, relocations and 
disposal areas (LERRD) are less than 20 percent of total 
project costs, local interests are required to furnish the 
standard local cooperation requirements plus a cash 
contribution, the total of the two to amount to a minimum of 
25 percent of the total project costs. On June 27, 1986, the 
City of Minneapolis entered into a local cooperation 
agreement with the Department of the Army. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Miscellaneous real estate costs were $19,581. Stage 
2C2, Stage 4, and Stage 2C3 construction contracts cost 
$6,075, $44,828, and $543,271, respectively. Engineering 
and design cost $957 by contract, and $230,815 by hired 
labor. Construction management cost $18,503 by hired 
labor. Total Federal costs were $767,958 and non-Federal, 
$96,072. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has 
been completed on all but three components. Of the three 
remaining components, one, the Medicine Lake Outlet 
Structure, is scheduled to be done by the local sponsor; 
another, the Highway 100 embankment and control 
structure,will be completed by the Corps of Engineers, and 
the third, the Fruen Mill channel work and railroad bridge 
replacement, was deleted from the project. 
9. BIG FORK RIVER, MN 
Location. Along the left bank of the Big Fork River, 
Koochiching County, about 300 miles north of Minneapolis- 
St. Paul, Minnesota. 
Existing project. The emergency streambank 
protection project on the Big Fork River involves 
approximately 500 feet of riverbank and consists of rockfill 
toe protection laid on geotextile and associated earthwork. 
The project was approved by the Engineering and Planning 
Directorate of the North Central Division for construction on 
18 May 1995 under the authority contained in Section 14 of 
the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement 
executed between the Federal Government and Koochiching 
County on 23 June 1995 required the county to provide, 
during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at 
least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds 
needed to make its total contribution, including the value of 
all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the 
total project costs; provide without cost to the United States 
all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable 
borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for 
construction, operation and maintenance of the project; 
perform all relocations and alterations of building utilities 
(other than those portions which pass under or through the 
project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than 
railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers and related 
and special facilities determined by the Government to be 
necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in 
excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold 
and save the United States free from all damages arising 
from construction, operation and maintenance of the 
completed project, except for damages due to the fault or 
negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with 
the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real 
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91- 
646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, 
easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent 
operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all 
affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and 
procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, 
replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in 
accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the 
Government; give the Government a right to enter, at 
reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land 
which it owns or controls for access to the project for the 
purpose of inspection and if necessary, for the purpose of 
completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, 
or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable 
Federal and State laws and regulations, including Section 601 
of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88- 
352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued 
pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code 
of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, 
entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in 
Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the 
Department of the Army." 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Engineering and design cost $46,903 by hired labor, 
all Federal. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for the 
emergency streambank protection project on the Big Fork 
24-5

REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
River in Koochiching County, Minnesota was awarded in 
September 1995. 
10. BIG STONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE 
RIVER, MN AND SD 
Location. On Minnesota River near Ortonville and 
Odessa, MN, and Big Stone City, SD, at the outlet of Big 
Stone Lake and in Big Stone and Lac qui Parle Counties, 
MN, and Grant County, SD. (For general location, see 
Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) 
Existing project. Provides for a dam and reservoir on 
Minnesota River above U.S. Highway 75, modification of 
Big Stone Lake outlet dam and silt barrier, bank stabilization 
along lower reach of Whetstone River, channel improvement 
on Minnesota River for 3 miles below outlet control dam at 
Big Stone Lake along with necessary relocations and 
acquisition of lands. These improvements would be made 
for wildlife conservation and development, flood control, and 
recreation. For additional details see Annual Report for 
1970. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act 
(H. Doc. 579, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest map; and 
H. Doc. 193, 88th Cong., 2d sess.). 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: The project was closed out with an overall 
adjustment of $-671. Total Federal costs were $-915 and 
non-Federal, $244. Maintenance: Structure was operated 
and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at 
a cost of $84,241 by hired labor and $3,489 by contract. 
Data collection, water control and water quality analysis cost 
$41,610 by hired labor. Data collection by other 
government agencies cost $26,400. Real estate management 
cost $5,000 by hired labor. A contract for dam stabilization 
cost $170,918. Water control equipment cost $13,140. 
Engineering and design costs were $15,387 by hired labor 
and $10,175 by contract. Supervision and inspection costs 
were $19,642. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
project is complete. A general plan between the Secretary 
of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior for 
administrating the use of waters, land, or interests therein 
has been consummated, and a cooperative agreement between 
the Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service was approved. On March 31, 1975, the Secretary 
of the Army transferred lands in the project not required for 
Corps of Engineers operation and maintenance to the 
Department of Interior. The transfer of property was 
accepted by the Department of the Interior on May 21, 1975. 
With the exception of the operation, maintenance, repair, and 
rehabilitation of the embankment, spillway, instrumentation, 
and related structures at the Highway 75, the project has 
been transferred to the Upper Minnesota River Watershed 
District. 
11. CHASKA, MN 
Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota 
on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see 
Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) 
Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of 
a levee and interior drainage works along the Minnesota 
River, flood diversion channels on Chaska Creek and East 
Creek, and appropriate floodplain regulation measures. 
Principal project features include: approximately 1.1 miles 
of upgraded levee, 1.5 miles of new levee, and one pumping 
station on the Minnesota River; 1.1 miles of diversion 
channel on Chaska Creek; and 1.0 mile of diversion channel 
on East Creek. Approximately 2.9 miles of paved recreation 
trails on top of the levee and around Courthouse Lake are 
also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost 
(1995) for new work is $29,300,000 and $12,500,000 is to 
be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by 
the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Dec. 644, 
94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for 
requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed 
on September 12, 1988. The agreement included cost 
sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water 
Resources Development Act. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Real estate activities cost $41,227 by hired labor. A 
moist soil construction contract cost $222,561. Stage 3 
construction relocations cost $29,936. Stage 3 construction 
channels contract cost $1,470,104. Stage 4 construction 
levee contract cost $3,618,941. Cultural resources by hired 
labor cost $3,175. Engineering and design cost $208,047 
by contract and $213,116 by hired labor. Supervision and 
inspection cost $262,924 by hired labor and $10,567 by 
contract. Total Federal costs were $5,261,425 and non- 
Federal, $819,173. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Stage 1 and Stage 2 
construction is complete. Stage 3 and Stage 4 construction 
contracts are underway 
12. EAU GALLE RIVER, WI 
Location. At and in vicinity of Spring Valley, WI, on 
Eau Galle River 30 miles above its mouth at Chippewa 
River, and its tributary, Mines Creek, which flows through 
the village. Spring Valley is about 45 miles east of St. Paul, 
MN, and 36 miles west of Eau Claire, WI. (See Geological 
Survey map for Wisconsin for general location.) 
24-6

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
Existing project. Authorized plan of improvement as 
modified by further studies includes a retarding dam and 
reservoir on Eau Galle River immediately upstream from 
Spring Valley, and remedial works on Mines Creek including 
channel enlargement, a low levee, and a drop structure. 
Project provides for earth and rock-fill dam, an uncontrolled 
outlet and an uncontrolled spillway emerging above Mines 
Creek. See page 1030 of Annual Report for 1965 for further 
details. Proposed improvements on Burghardt Creek were 
eliminated. Improvements provide complete protection near 
Spring Valley for standard project flood, and below that 
point in decreasing value in proportion to distance from 
reservoir. Permanent conservation pool will serve a local 
need for a recreational area. Project was authorized by 1958 
Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 52, 84th Cong., 1st Sess., 
contains latest published map.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 
1083 of Annual Report for 1967. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Structure and recreation facilities were operated and 
maintained, and inspections, investigations and evaluations 
were performed at a cost of $323,240 by hired labor and 
$109,504 by contract. Data collection cost $2,107 by hired 
labor and $7,790 by other government agencies. Water 
control cost $15,086. Water quality analysis by hired labor, 
contract, and water quality by other Corps of Engineer 
districts cost $-232, $-3,000, and $6,022, respectively. 
Equipment replacement cost $8,384 by hired labor and $937 
by contract. Engineering and design cost $7,380. 
Supervision and inspection costs were $9,278. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Mines Creek 
improvements were substantially completed in 1964; minor 
work was accomplished in 1966. A contract for dam, 
spillway, and discharge channel, started July 1, 1965, was 
completed in October 1968. Recreational facilities have been 
provided. Remedial work to repair eroded gutters and road 
ditches was completed in September 1973. Repair of failing 
discharge conduit by installing a steel liner was completed in 
April 1982. 
13. GILMORE CREEK, WINONA, 
MN 
Location. Gilmore Creek is located in southwestern 
portion of the city of Winona, Minnesota. Winona is the 
County Seat of Winona County and is located along the west 
bank of the Mississippi River about 120 miles south of St. 
Paul, Minnesota. 
Existing project. The flood damage reduction project 
at Gilmore Creek is designed to provide protection from an 
estimated Gilmore Creek flood having a 1 percent chance of 
occurring during any one year (100-year flood.) The project 
involves raising the right bank levee along Gilmore Creek 
from Boilers Lake upstream to high ground, removing the 
Gilmore Avenue bridge and left bank approach and an 
existing left bank levee, reconstructing an existing earth 
levee along Ditch No. 3 between U.S. Highway 14 and 44th 
Avenue in Goodview, and constructing a continuous flood 
barrier from near 44th Avenue westerly to high ground west 
of Bollers Lake. The flood barrier would consist of a raise 
of the southbound lanes of Highway 61 east of 54th Avenue 
and an earth levee adjacent to Highway 61 west of 54th 
Avenue. Also, the project would involve modifications to 
the Bollers Lake outlet including replacement of the existing 
box culvert and construction of a weir at the head of the new 
box culvert. The project was approved by the Chief of 
Engineers for construction 13 July 1993 under the authority 
contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as 
amended. 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
was executed between the Federal Government and the city 
of Winona on 20 July 1993. See Annual Report for 1994 for 
requirements. 
Operations and results during the fiscal year. 
Miscellaneous Real Estate costs were $22,627. A highway 
raise contract cost $180,625. A Stage 1 construction 
contract cost $1,047,224. Engineering and Design cost was 
$37,774. There was a credit, $-200,000, for contributions in 
the aid of construction. Supervision and inspection cost 
$62,460 by hired labor and $804 by contract. Federal costs 
were $1,145,265 and non-Federal $6,249. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for the 
flood damage reduction project at Gilmore Creek was 
awarded in September 1994. Construction of the project is 
essentially complete. 
14. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND 
Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River 
about 4 miles upstream from Park River, ND, and 62.1 
miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, and North 
Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier 
County in northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an 
almost common confluence near Grafton, ND, forming main 
stream which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of 
the North about 35 miles south of the international boundary. 
(For general location, see Geological Survey map of North 
Dakota.) 
Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. 
Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 
Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.), and 
redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 
80th Congress, 2d session. Project restoration of wetland 
habitat conditions is taking place under the authority 
24-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
contained in Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources 
Development Act, as amended. Latest published map is in 
project document. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total costs 
for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of 
project authorization, including required non-Federal 
contributions, were $62,800. In addition, local interests 
contributed $16,220 for construction of a water supply outlet 
through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. The 
North Dakota Game and Fish Department has agreed to 
serve as the non-Federal sponsor for the environment 
improvement to the project. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Engineering and design cost $642. Federal costs 
were $642. Maintenance: Structure was operated, 
maintained, inspected and evaluations were performed at a 
cost of $206,995. Dam Safety: Engineering and design cost 
$27,405 by contract and $263,260 by hired labor. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in 
June 1956 except for additional recreational facilities which 
have been done intermittently since that time. Construction 
began in April 1948 and major structures completed in May 
1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has 
acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 
acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land 
have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 
acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the 
project. Construction of a habitat improvement project 
(under Section 1135 authority) was completed and the project 
was turned over to the local sponsor, the North Dakota Fish 
and Game Department. 
15. HOUSTON, MN 
Location. The project is located in the city of 
Houston, in Houston County, in southeastern Minnesota. 
The city of Houston is adjacent to the Root River, which is 
a tributary to the Mississippi River. The city is bounded by 
floodplain agricultural land to the west and east, and by steep 
bluffs to the south and by the Root River to the north. 
Existing project. The flood control project is designed 
to provide protection to the city of Houston against the 100- 
year flood on the Root River. There are currently two levee 
systems in the vicinity of Houston; neither of which provides 
adequate protection against the 100-year flood. 
Proposed measures to provide 100 year flood protection 
to the city of Houston include: A levee system, two fullheight 
road raises; and a sandbag closure. 
To ease the constriction at the Hwy 76 bridge, an 
existing portion of the MnDoT levee will be removed, and 
a high-flow channel will be constructed on the north bank of 
the Root River. 
The project also includes construction of two ponding 
areas to supplement existing interior ponding, three interior 
gravity outlets, one exterior gravity outlet and an ditch 
constructed between the levee and the Root River to carry 
gravity flow from outlet A-1. 
The project was approved for construction under 
Section 401 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act 
(PL 99-662), as amended; and is also authorized under 
Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; 
and Section 4 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1988, as amended. 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement, 
executed between the Federal Government and the city of 
Houston required the city to provide, during the period of 
construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of total 
project costs and any additional funds needed to make its 
total contribution, including the value of all required local 
responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; 
provide without cost to the United States all lands, 
easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and 
dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, 
operation and maintenance of the project; perform all 
relocations and alterations of buildings utilities (other than 
those portions which pass under or through the project 
structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad 
bridges and approaches thereto), sewers and related and 
special facilities determined by the Government to be 
necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in 
excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $5,000,000; hold 
and save the United States free from all damages arising 
from construction, operation and maintenance of the 
completed project, except for damages due to the fault or 
negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with 
the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real 
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91- 
646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, 
easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent 
operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all 
affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and 
procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, 
replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in 
accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the 
Government; give the Government a right to enter, at 
reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land 
which it owns or controls for access to the project for the 
purpose of inspection, and if necessary, for the purpose of 
completing operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, 
or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable 
Federal and State laws and regulations, including Section 601 
of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88- 
352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued 
pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code 
of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, 
entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in 
Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the 
24-8

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
Department of the Army" as well as Army Regulation 600-7, 
entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in 
Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the 
Department of the Army." The current Federal cost is 
estimated to be $4,764,000. the local share is estimated to 
be $1,588,000. The total project cost is estimated to be 
$6,352,000. By a resolution dated April 8, 1991, the city of 
Houston expressed its commitment to the financial 
requirements of the project. The city reaffirmed its 
commitment by letter dated May 6, 1992. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Preconstruction engineering and design continued at 
a cost of $20,755. Real estate costs were $75,748. 
Engineering and design cost $159,863. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. 
engineering and design is in progress. 
Preconstruction 
16. LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA 
RIVER, MN 
Location. Works covered by this project lie along 
Marsh Lake and Lac qui Parle and the Minnesota River 
between head of Marsh Lake and Granite Falls, MN. (For 
general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) 
Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Project was operated, maintained, inspected and 
evaluations were performed at a cost of $245,447 by hired 
labor and $20,531 by contract. Data collection cost $10,286 
by hired labor, $1,105 by contract, and $47,800 by U.S. 
Geological Survey. Water control analysis cost $21,101. 
Water control planning cost $68,597 by hired labor and an 
adjustment was made for $-1,563 with other Corps offices. 
Water quality analysis cost $32,855 by hired labor, $-110 by 
other Corps offices and $2,862 by contract. Real estate cost 
$11,405. Clearing and snagging along the Minnesota River 
cost $25,943 and $245 by contract. Water control equipment 
cost $17,146. Supeivision and inspection cost $30,851 by 
hired labor and $224 by contract.. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been 
operated by the Government since transfer from State of 
Minnesota to the United States in September 1950. The 
United States owns fee title to 517.62 acres of land and 
easements on 19,859.47 acres of land. In 1957, 60.1 acres 
were withdrawn from public lands for use by the Department 
of the Army. Land acquisition is complete. Construction 
under present plan of improvement was started in September 
1941 and completed in December 1951 except for 
recreational facilities. All structures are in good condition. 
17. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL 
IMPROVEMENT, WI 
Location. On the Kickapoo River which rises in 
Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south 
and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and Crawford 
Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles 
above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For 
general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) 
Existing project. Provides for a dam and 
impoundment of the Kickapoo River about 1 mile upstream 
from village of La Farge, operated for flood control, fish 
and wildlife conservation, general recreation, and a reduction 
of aggradation downstream from the dam, and supplemental 
protection at Soldiers Grove and at Gays Mills by means of 
levees, supplementary channel improvement, and interior 
drainage facilities. See Annual Report for 1975 for details. 
Estimated Federal cost (1976) for new work is 
$55,400,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control 
Act (H. Doc. 557, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest 
published map.) 
Local cooperation. None required for construction of 
La Farge Lake. See Annual Report for 1967 for 
requirements for local protection works. Local interests have 
not been requested to furnish assurances. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Project was operated and maintained at a cost of 
$40,106. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. General and Real 
Estate design memorandums and detailed plans for the La 
Farge Dam and spillway and for relocations have been 
completed. Land acquisition negotiations began in December 
1968. The first land payment was made on January 15, 
1969, and the land acquisition program is 80 percent 
complete. Contracts for excavation of the left abutment, for 
test wells, and for construction of the outlet works and right 
abutment have been completed. A study of alternatives has 
been completed. All further construction has been 
indefinitely suspended. Work has been accomplished to 
provide for completion of relocation work left partially 
completed when construction was suspended. Soldiers Grove 
has relocated out of the floodplain area after receiving funds 
from other agencies. A study of a modified dry dam was 
24-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
completed in early FY 1985. On the basis of the study 
results, it was recommended that no further work be done to 
establish the economic feasibility of a dry or wet dam at La 
Farge and that the La Farge Lake and channel improvement 
project be deauthorized. 
18. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL 
DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, ND 
Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 
miles upstream from Valley City, ND, and about 271 miles 
above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota 
and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River 
of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, ND. (For 
general location see Geological Survey map of North 
Dakota.) 
Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. 
Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. 
Doc. 193, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published 
map). Estimated cost (1995) to the United States for Major 
Rehabilitation is $6,040,000. Estimated cost (1995) to the 
United States for new Dam Safety Assurance work is 
$17,380,000 and $309,000 is to be contributed by local 
interests. Reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as 
Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d 
session. 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1962. 
Complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Major 
Rehabilitation: Stage 1 and Stage 2 construction contracts 
cost $1,068,637 and $425,009, respectively. Engineering 
and design by hired labor cost $199,581 and $200,252 by 
contract. Supervision and inspection cost $7,812 by contract 
and $137,400 by hired labor. Total Federal costs were 
$3,806,561. Dam Safety: Stage 1 utility relocation cost 
$86,742. Stage 1 and Stage 2 construction contracts cost 
$618,585 and $2,616,363, respectively. Stage 2 dam safety 
instrumentation installation cost $11,002. Engineering and 
design cost $168,031 by contract and $171,901 by hired 
labor. Supervision and inspection cost $5,497 by contract 
and $178,440 by hired labor. Total Federal costs were 
$3,806,561 and non-Federal costs, $50,000. Maintenance: 
Project was operated, maintained, inspected, investigated, 
monitored and evaluations were performed at a cost of 
$509,853 by hired labor and $201,137 by contract. Real 
estate management cost $142,717. Data collection cost 
$19,133 by hired labor, and $79,555 by other government 
agencies. A law enforcement contract cost $6,800. Water 
quality and water control analysis by hired labor cost 
$38,825 and $24,138, respectively. Spurge control cost 
$12,522 by contract and $12,549 by hired labor. 
Engineering and design cost $46,009 by hired labor and $204 
by contract. Supervision and inspection and other costs were 
$51,360. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in 
March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities 
which is being accomplished intermittently. United States 
owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 
acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features 
completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in 
permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in 
good condition. Baldhill Dam has been classified as a large, 
high hazard dam under the National Program for the 
inspection of dams. A risk assessment report prepared in 
June 1986 indicated a serious spillway discharge capacity 
deficiency. In July 1994, the first stage of construction of 
the Dam Safety modifications was started. Construction is 
currently underway. 
19. LAKE TRAVERSE AND BOIS DE SK)IOUX 
RIVER, SD AND MN 
Location. Works covered by this project lie along 
Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River between upper end 
of Lake Traverse at Browns Valley, MN, and the mouth of 
Bois de Sioux River at Breckenridge, MN. The project 
terminates six miles south of Breckenridge (six miles 
upstream of the Bois de Sioux River mouth). Lake drains 
through river to Red River of the North, and two waters 
form a portion of boundary between State of Minnesota and 
States of North and South Dakota. (For general location, see 
Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) 
Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. 
Existing project was authorized by Flood Control Act of June 
22, 1936. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Project and related facilities were operated and 
maintained, and inspected and evaluations were performed at 
a cost of $555,258. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. bxisting project was 
completed in June 1948, except for minor recreational 
facilities. Fee title to 1,144.13 acres and easements on 
6,172.25 acres of land have been acquired. White Rock 
Dam and Reservation control structures are in operation, the 
structures and appurtenances are in good condition. 
Remedial work for repair of apron at White Rock Dam was 
completed in November 1968. Roadways across structure 
are open to public travel. 
24-10

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
20. MANKATO AND NORTH MANKATO, 
MN 
Location. Along Minnesota River between miles 103.5 
and 109.5 near Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier, in 
south-central Minnesota. (For general location see 
Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) 
Existing project. As modified as a result of severe 
1965 flood, provides for protection of communities of 
Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier by means of levees 
and floodwalls with pumping plants and interior drainage 
facilities. See page 1090 of Annual Report for 1967 for 
further details. Additional channel improvement, levees, 
pumping, and interior drainage features have been included 
in the Mankato unit of the project for protection from the 
high flows of Indian Creek. Expansion of Indian Creek 
improvements were made during detailed studies as a result 
of updated hydrologic data. Highway bridge relocations 
made necessary by the project have been authorized at 
Federal expense. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood 
Control Act (H. Doc. 437, 84th Cong., 2d sess., contains 
latest published map.) Project was modified by 1965 Flood 
Control Act, and by the Water Resources Development Acts 
of 1974 and 1976. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Administration, 
audit and other miscellaneous costs were $3,134. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
project is complete. 
21. MARSHALL, MN 
Location. In Lyon County in southwestern Minnesota 
along the Redwood River about 68 miles above its 
confluence with the Minnesota River at the city of Marshall, 
Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map 
for Minnesota.) 
Existing project. See page 1059 of Annual Report for 
1964 for completed channel improvement project authorized 
by 1960 Flood Control Act. Federal costs amounted to 
$1,802,866. The existing flood control project was 
completed in 1963. In response to a need for additional 
flood control, a feasibility study was completed in 1979. 
The project recommended in the feasibility report was 
authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986, Public Law 99-662, Section 401(a) and reauthorized 
by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public 
Law 100-676. Improvements include 4.7 miles of additional 
levees, 3.8 miles of bank protection, 0.3 mile of new 
high-flow diversion channel, an interbasin overflow 
structures, and a recreation plan. The recreation plan 
consists of 2.5 miles of biking/walking trail, five miles of 
cross-country skiing/hiking trail, and related picnic and rest 
area facilities. The project would provide protection against 
a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 115 
years. Estimated Federal cost (1995) for new work is 
$6,340,000 and $2,460,000 is to be contributed by local 
interests. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. Project was transferred to local interests on 
December 23, 1963. 
For new work, see Annual Report for 1985 for 
requirements. By letter dated June 26, 1989, the city of 
Marshall indicated its willingness to participate financially in 
construction of a project consistent with the cost sharing and 
financing concepts reflected in the 1986 Water Resources 
Development Act. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was 
continued at a cost of $4,893. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of 
completed work was initiated August 1962 and completed 
December 1963. Preconstruction engineering and design is 
complete. Plans and specifications for the first stage of 
construction are complete. 
22. MINNESOTA RIVER, BELGRADE 
TOWNSHIP, MN 
Location. Along the left bank of the Minnesota River, 
Belgrade Township, Nicollet County, about 85 miles 
southwest of St. Paul, Minnesota. 
Existing project. Provide for erosion control along the 
north bank of the Minnesota River to protect County State 
Aid Highway 41. The project involves clearing and 
placement of rock protection along 700 feet of riverbank. 
The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for 
construction in July 1993 under the authority contained in 
Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. Nicollet County Minnesota has 
agreed to serve as the non-Federal sponsor for this project. 
A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of 
the Army and Nicollet County was fully executed on 6 
August 1993. See Annual Report for 1993 for requirements. 
Operations and results during the fiscal year. New 
Work: Engineering and design costs were $108. 
Miscellaneous project management costs were $2,270. 
Federal costs were $-10,790 while non-Federal were 
$13,168. 
structure, modifications to the existing diversion and drop
24-11

REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 
complete. 
23. MINNESOTA RIVER AT HENDERSON, 
MN 
Location. In Sibley County in southeastern Minnesota 
about 50 miles southwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota. (For 
general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) 
Existing project. The project at Henderson involves 
a system of levees to protect the flood prone areas of the city 
from floods on the Minnesota River. The proposed levee is 
about 1.6 miles long and has an average height of 12 feet. 
Appurtenant interior flood control facilities include a system 
of interceptor storm sewers and ditches, and two ponding 
areas each with a gravity outlet and a pumping station 
designed to discharge impounded storm water during flood 
periods when exterior flood levels would require the gravity 
outlets to be closed. Provisions for the temporary closure of 
two state highways and a county highway are also included 
as project features. The project was approved by the Chief 
of Engineers for construction June 26, 1987, under the 
authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control 
Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for 
requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by 
the City of Henderson, the local sponsor, in May 1988. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Construction and seeding contracts cost $24,900 and 
$8,720, respectively. Engineering and design cost $18,199 
by hired labor and $55 by contract. Construction 
management cost $5,284. Federal costs were $57,158. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
project was substantially complete at the end of the fiscal 
year. 
24. PORTAGE, WI 
Location. In Columbia County in central Wisconsin 
along the Wisconsin River about 35 miles north of Madison, 
Wisconsin. (For general location see Geological Survey map 
for Wisconsin.) 
Existing project. The recommended plan provides for 
improvement to the existing levee system along the left bank 
of the Wisconsin River at Portage. The plan includes 1.2 
miles of existing levee improvement; 1.6 miles of new levee; 
one highway and one railroad closure; cultural mitigation; 
and recreation features. The project would protect against a 
flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 100 
years. Estimated Federal cost (1995) for new work is 
$6,040,000 and $2,220,000 is to be contributed by local 
interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662). 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1989 for 
requirements. By Council Resolution dated June 25, 1992, 
the city of Portage indicated a willingness and intention to 
meet the requirements of local cooperation for flood control 
and recreation, subject to reaching agreement with the state 
of Wisconsin on cost-sharing responsibilities. A draft project 
cooperation agreement will be negotiated and finalized prior 
to initiation of construction. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was 
continued at a cost of $13,683. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction 
engineering and design is in progress. 
25. RED LAKE RIVER, MN, INCLUDING 
CLEARWATER RIVER, MN 
Location. Works covered by this project lie along 
upper reach of Red Lake River and also along Clearwater 
River, a tributary of Red Lake River, between a point near 
Plummer, MN, and a point just above the mouth of Ruffy 
Brook. Red Lake River, principal tributary of the Red River 
of the North, has its source at the outlet of Lower Red Lake 
in northwestern portion of Minnesota and flows westerly 
about 196 miles to its junction with Red River of the North 
at East Grand Forks, MN. Clearwater River has a general 
westerly course from its source near Ebro, MN, about 205 
miles to its junction with Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, 
MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of 
Minnesota.) 
Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. 
Project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 
345, 78th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Structures were operated and maintained and 
inspections, evaluations and engineering and design was 
performed at a cost of $800,129. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of 
major improvements on Red Lake River and the Clearwater 
River was completed in June 1956. Replacement of rock and 
brush dam on Red Lake River at Indian boundary with a 
concrete structure and appurtenant work was completed in 
June 1959 to restore marshes in the area to better wildlife 
conditions. Construction of a bridge on Clearwater Road 
was completed by the Indian Service in July 1965. A 
contract for improvements on Red Lake River was completed 
24-12

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
in November 1966, and a contract for restoration of water 
levels in Red Lake River marshes was completed in 
vember 1968. Operation of Red Lake Dam was assumed 
by the Corps on April 1, 1951. Channels are in good 
condition and indicate effectiveness of project as a flood 
control measure. 
26. RED LAKE RIVER, POLK COUNTY, 
CROOKSTON, MN 
Location. Along the left bank of the Red Lake River 
at the City of Crookston municipal sewage ponds 
approximately one river mile downstream of the Highway 75 
bridge in Crookston, Polk County, Minnesota. The area is 
about 26 miles east of Grand Forks, North Dakota. 
Existing project. The emergency streambank 
protection project on the Red Lake River involves 
approximately 600 feet of riverbank and consists of rockfill 
toe protection laid on bedding material. The project was 
approved by the Engineering and Planning Directorate of the 
North Central Division for construction on 30 June 1994 
under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood 
Control Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement 
executed between the Federal Government and the City of 
Crookston on 6 July 1995 required the county to provide, 
during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at 
least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds 
needed to make its total contribution, including the value of 
all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the 
total project costs; provide without cost to the United States 
all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable 
borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for 
construction, operation and maintenance of the project; 
perform all relocations and alterations of building utilities 
(other than those portions which pass under or through the 
project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than 
railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers and related 
and special facilities determined by the Government to be 
necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in 
excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold 
and save the United States free from all damages arising 
from construction, operation and maintenance of the 
completed project, except for damages due to the fault or 
negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with 
the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real 
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91- 
646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, 
easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent 
operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all 
affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and 
procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, 
replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in 
accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the 
Government; give the Government a right to enter, at 
reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land 
which it owns or controls for access to the project for the 
purpose of inspection and if necessary, for the purpose of 
completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, 
or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable 
Federal and State laws and regulations, including Section 601 
of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88- 
352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued 
pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code 
of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, 
entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in 
Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the 
Department of the Army." 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Engineering and design cost $27,916 by hired labor, 
all Federal costs. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for the 
emergency streambank protection project on the Red River 
in Polk County, Minnesota was awarded in September of 
1995. 
27. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH 
DRAINAGE BASIN, MN, SD & ND 
Location. Red River of the North Basin, within the 
United States, includes northeastern corner of South Dakota 
and much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern 
Minnesota. Red River of the North, formed by confluence 
of Otter Tail and Bois de Sioux Rivers, flows northward 
through this region, forming boundary between North Dakota 
and Minnesota. (For general location of basin, see 
Geological Survey maps of Minnesota and South Dakota.) 
Previous project. See Annual Report for 1962 for 
navigation and flood control projects in the basin, not part of 
this project. 
Existing project. Project includes improvements for 
local protection in interests of flood control and major 
drainage accomplished by channel improvement, levees, etc., 
in addition to construction of a multiple purpose reservoir on 
Otter Tail River to control floods and, in conjunction with 
previously authorized Federal reservoir project at Baldhill 
site of Sheyenne River and at Red Lake, to increase low 
flows for water supply and pollution abatement. (See Table 
24-I for active units in comprehensive basin plan and Table 
24-E for projects completed under separate authorities.) 
Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1948 
and 1950. Public Works Authorization Act, 1957, 
authorized Chief of Engineers to acquire such lands as were 
beyond legal authority of the city of Grand Forks to acquire. 
Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 provided for 
extension of the expiration date for the East Grand Forks 
24-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
project. Authorization of the Sheyenne River (Kindred Lake) 
project by the 1970 Flood Control Act provided for the 
deletion of channel improvement on the lower 48.8 miles of 
the Sheyenne River authorized under the Flood Control Acts 
of 1948 and 1950. Latest published map is in House 
Document 185, 81st Congress, 1st session. 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1965. 
Following the flood of 1965, the city of East Grand Forks 
requested reactivation of the project and furnished a 
resolution adopted May 11, 1965, indicating its willingness 
to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Expiration 
date for the East Grand Forks project was extended to April 
17, 1975, permitting local interests additional time to furnish 
assurances of local cooperation. A local assurance 
agreement was passed by the city on March 27, 1975, and 
accepted by the acting Director of Real Estate, OCE for the 
Secretary of the Army on April 9, 1975. In a July 9, 1986 
letter, the city of East Grand Forks withdrew support for the 
project presented in the General Design Memorandum. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: A construction contract credit adjustment totalled 
$-569. Phase 2 construction contract cost $26,779, and by 
hired labor, $154. Engineering and design cost $8,557. 
Supervision and inspection cost $561. Federal costs were 
$22,120 while non-Federal were $13,362. Maintenance: 
Orwell Lake and Dam were operated as required and 
miscellaneous inspections, reports, and repairs were made at 
a cost of $104,299 by hired labor and $157,909 by contract. 
Real estate management cost $1,678. Data collection cost 
$9,216 by hired labor and $21,600 by U.S. Geological 
Survey. Water control cost $14,828. Water quality analysis 
cost $3,982 by hired labor and $684 by contract. 
Engineering and design cost $324,972 by hired labor and 
$11,580 by contract. Supervision and inspection costs were 
$12,345. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Major construction 
for all active units except for East Grand Forks, MN, is 
complete. The East Grand Forks project was reclassified 
from active to inactive status on August 19, 1988. A total 
of 1,985 acres of land for Orwell Lake and Dam is owned in 
fee by the United States. See page 1281 of Annual Report 
for 1962 for periods of completion at active units of project 
other than Fargo. Work at Fargo, ND, started in May 1959, 
was completed in July 1963. Construction of a habitat 
improvement project (under Section 1135 authority) was 
completed at Orwell Lake and Dam and plans and 
specifications for another habitat improvement project were 
completed. The local sponsor is the Minnesota Department 
of Natural Resources. (See Table 24-I at end of chapter for 
total costs of new work to date.) 
28. ROCHESTER, MN 
Location. In Olmsted County in southeastern 
Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For 
general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) 
Existing project. Provides for stream channel 
modifications and levees functioning in combination with a 
system of seven headwaters reservoirs. Principal features, 
in addition to the reservoirs, include 5.7 miles of riprapped 
or gabion-lined channels, 0.7 mile of architecturally-treated 
concrete channels, 0.5 mile of dredged channel, three drop 
structures, 1.3 miles of levee, and 6.5 miles of hiking and 
biking trails and non-structural features. Project was 
authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., 1st sess., contains latest 
published map.) 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for 
requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed 
August 27, 1987 by the city of Rochester. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Construction contracts for Stage 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B 
and 4 cost $714,175, $57,002, $1,385,424, $74,202 and 
$1,466,923, respectively. Miscellaneous construction costs 
totalled $5,709. A payment to the local sponsor for excess 
contributions amounted to $1,297,842. Engineering and 
design cost $428,285. Construction management cost 
$541,935. Real estate costs totalled $52,559. Audit costs 
were $9,680. Total Federal costs were $4,455,595 and non- 
Federal costs were $1,578,141. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is 
substantially complete. 
29. ROSEAU RIVER, MN 
Location. In Roseau County on the Roseau River in 
northwestern Minnesota near the city of Duxby. (For 
general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) 
Existing project. See Annual Report for 1988 for 
description of project as authorized by the Flood Control Act 
of 1965. The project, as modified by the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1988, provided for construction of about 
24-14

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
6 miles of flood control levee approximately 3 feet high in 
the vicinity of Duxby, Minnesota. 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for 
requirements of project as authorized by the Flood Control 
Act of 1965. See Annual Report for 1991 for requirements 
of modified project. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Engineering costs for a reevaluation of flood control 
alternatives at Roseau totaled $8,663. Total Federal costs 
were $3,190 and non-Federal costs were $5,473. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction 
contract for the Duxby levee project was awarded in July 
1991. Construction is complete. 
30. SANDERS CREEK, 
BOSCOBEL, WI 
Location. Boscobel is located in north central Grant 
County in southwestern Wisconsin, approximately 70 miles 
west of Madison, Wisconsin. This project addresses 
flooding problems from Sanders Creek, which flows through 
the center of Boscobel and enters the Wisconsin River about 
one mile west of the city. 
Existing project. The project is designed to increase 
flow capacity to protect against a one percent flood event on 
Sanders Creek. Major features of the project include 
regrading about 1/2 mile of the existing overflow channel, 
replacement of the Kansas Street bridge, demolition of the 
Bluff Street bridge, with a drop structure constructed at the 
old Bluff Street bridge site, and replacement of the railroad 
bridge timber piers with concrete monoliths. The project 
was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in 
October 1991 under the authority contained in Section 205 of 
the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. In addition, at 
100 percent non-Federal expense, a new bridge deck and 
approaches were added to the Bluff Street drop structure 
design. 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report of 1993 for 
requirements. The City of Boscobel agreed to serve as the 
non-Federal sponsor for this project. A Local Cooperation 
Agreement between the Department of the Army and City of 
Boscobel was fully executed on 19 December 1991. 
Operations and results during the fiscal year. New 
Work: Construction contracts cost $15,636. Engineering 
and design cost $14,653 by hired labor. Construction 
management cost $3,635 by hired labor. Total Federal costs 
were $36,103 non-Federal costs $-2,179. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for 
construction of the project was awarded in December 1992. 
Construction of the project is essentially complete. 
31. SHEYENNE RIVER, ND 
Location. The Sheyenne River Basin is included in 16 
counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and 
drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of 
the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area of 
flood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within 
Cass County and the city of West Fargo. (For general 
location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) 
Existing project. The project as authorized by the 
1986 Water Resources Development Act consists of three 
major components for Federal implementation: 1) 11.9 
miles of levee and a 6.7 mile flood diversion channel at West 
Fargo; 2) 7.5 miles of flood diversion channel from Horace 
to West Fargo; and 3) a five-foot raise of the Baldhill Dam 
flood control pool. The Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 stipulated that the project shall also include a dam 
and reservoir of approximately 35,000 acre-feet of storage 
for the purpose of flood protection on the Maple River. 
There are several items of local cooperation required to 
implement the plan, and several components identified for 
non-Federal implementation which would supplement the 
recommended plan. Estimated cost (1994) to the United 
States for new work is $32,050,000 and $16,350,000 is to be 
contributed by local interests. 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for 
requirements. Project consists of three separable components 
each requiring a local cooperation agreement. The Southeast 
Cass Water Resource District is the local sponsor for the 
West Fargo Unit and the Horace to West Fargo Unit. The 
local cooperation agreement for the West Fargo Unit was 
executed on July 25, 1988, and for the Horace to West 
Fargo unit on March 6, 1990. The Sheyenne River Joint 
Water Resource District has been formed to serve as the 
sponsor for the Baldhill Dam flood control pool raise unit. 
The Maple River Reservoir Unit has been deleted from the 
project. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Real estate review of LEERD credit cost $3,723. 
Construction contracts at West Fargo cost $45,263. 
Engineering and design cost $28,306 by hired labor. 
Construction management cost $6,034. A channel 
construction contract at Horace cost $216,894. Engineering 
and design cost $44,289 by hired labor and $1,750 by 
contract. Construction management cost $12,611. For 
Baldhill Dam, engineering and design cost $188,368 by hired 
24-15

REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
labor, $906 by contract while real estate planning costs were 
$75,034. Total Federal costs were $623,164 and non- 
Federal costs were $14. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of both 
the West Fargo and Horace to West Fargo Units are 
essentially complete. Both of these units were operated 
during the spring and summer floods of 1993 and the spring 
floods in 1994 and 1995 and performed very well. 
Evaluation of real estate needs, design of the structural 
modifications and coordination with the Sheyenne River Joint 
Water Resource District, for the raise of the flood pool at 
Baldhill Dam, is ongoing. The Maple River Reservoir unit 
has been deleted from the project due to lack of economic 
justification. 
32. SNAKE RIVER AT ALVARADO, MN 
Location. Alvarado is located in Marshall County in 
northwestern Minnesota approximately 20 miles north of 
Grand Forks, North Dakota. For general location see 
Geological Survey map of Minnesota. 
Existing project. The flood control project at 
Alvarado is designed to protect the city from a Snake River 
flood having an estimated one percent chance of occurring 
during any one year (100-year flood). The project involves 
the construction of about 1.4 miles of earth levees and 600 
feet of concrete floodwall, and interior flood control 
facilities involving four ponding areas with gated outlet 
pipes, a pumping station and interceptor ditches and 
conduits. With the project the city would be required to 
provide temporary sandbag closures of two roadway 
locations and two railroad relocations during extreme flood 
events. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers 
for construction 21 April 1992 under the authority contained 
in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1993 for 
requirements. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed 
between the Federal Government and the city of Alvarado on 
27 April 1992. 
Operations and results during the fiscal year. New 
Work: A credit adjustment of $-74 was made on a 
construction contract. Engineering and design by hired labor 
cost $7,395. Construction management cost $14,853 by 
hired labor. Total costs, all Federal, were $22,174. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for the 
flood control project at Alvarado was awarded in May 1993. 
Construction of the project was 95 percent complete at the 
end of the fiscal year. 
33. SOGN, MN 
Location. Along the right bank of the Little Cannon 
River, at the Sogn Valley Trail Township road bridge, in 
Goodhue County, Minnesota. The area is about 45 miles 
south of Minneapolis, Minnesota. 
Existing project. The emergency streambank 
protection project is on the Little Cannon River and involves 
approximately 90 feet of riverbank and consists of rockfill 
toe protection laid on geotextile. The project was approved 
by the Engineering and Planning Directorate of the North 
Central Division for construction on 14 October 1994 under 
the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood 
Control Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
executed between the Federal Government and the Warsaw 
Township Board on 24 January 1995 required the county to 
provide, during the period of construction, a cash 
contribution of at least 5 percent of total project costs and 
any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, 
including the value of all required local responsibilities, 
equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provide without 
cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, 
including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal 
areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance 
of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of 
building utilities (other than those portions which pass under 
or through the project structures), highways, railroads, 
bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), 
sewers and related and special facilities determined by the 
Government to be necessary for construction of the project; 
pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of 
$500,000; hold and save the United States free from all 
damages arising from construction, operation and 
maintenance of the completed project, except for damages 
due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its 
contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform 
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies 
Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, 
in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for 
construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the 
project, and inform all affected persons of applicable 
benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said 
Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project 
upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions 
prescribed by the Government; give the Government a right 
to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, 
upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project 
for the purpose of inspection and if necessary, for the 
purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, 
rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with all 
24-16

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, including 
Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 
(Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 
5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of 
Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army 
Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis 
of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or 
Conducted by the Department of the Army." 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Engineering and design cost $5,770 by hired labor, 
all Federal cost. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for the 
emergency streambank protection project on the Little 
Cannon River in Goodhue County, Minnesota was awarded 
in May of 1995. 
34. SOURIS RIVER BASIN, ND 
Location. On the Souris River in Ward, Renville, 
McHenry, and Bottineau Counties in northwestern North 
Dakota. The existing Lake Darling Dam is located about 20 
miles northwest of Minot, North Dakota. The project also 
includes features at the communities of Sawyer and Velva 
and at various locations along the 358-mile U.S. portion of 
the Souris River. (For general location see Geological 
Survey map of North Dakota.) 
Existing project. The current plan of improvement 
authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
is the one-time purchase of 377,800 acre-feet of flood 
storage in Rafferty and Alameda Dams in Saskatchewan, 
Canada and the operation of these dams with the existing 
Boundary Dam and Lake Darling Dam to provide 100-year 
flood protection at Minot, North Dakota. The Act also 
authorizes those flood control measures upstream and 
downstream of the dam which are necessary for effective 
operation of the project. The 4-foot raise of the Lake 
Darling design pool (authorized by Section III of the Energy 
and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1982, PL 97- 
88) and the construction of Burlington Dam (authorized by 
PL 91-611) was deauthorized 13 September 1994 with the 
completion of the structure(s) in Canada. An International 
Agreement between Canada and the United States was signed 
in October 1989. 
The work under the current plan authorized by PL 99- 
662, consists of either one or two reservoirs in 
Saskatchewan, Canada (known as the Rafferty and Alameda 
projects); a modified outflow structure at Lake Darling Dam; 
a flood warning system for Minot; levee and channel 
improvements at Sawyer and six subdivisions from 
Burlington to Minot; levee and diversion channel at Renville 
County Park; flood proofing of about 90 rural homes in the 
basin and the purchase of flowage easements; modifications 
to dams 87 and 96 in the Upper Souris National Wildlife 
Refuge; and modifications to dams 320, 326, 332, 341 and 
357 in the J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge. 
Estimated Federal cost (1995) for new work is $109,260,000 
and $8,180,000 is to be contributed by local interests. 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for 
requirements. Representatives of the water resource districts 
from Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties area 
agreed to become members of a Souris River Joint Board for 
flood control, which would serve as local sponsor for the 
project. A local cooperation agreement for construction at 
Velva was signed in November 1984. A local cooperation 
agreement for the remainder of the project as authorized by 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was signed 
in October 1989. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Respective costs for the applicable sub-projects are 
as follows: Engineering and design of project features 
continued at a cost of $147,601 by hired labor and $59,214 
by contract. Supervision and inspection cost $5,292. For 
Burlington to Minot, engineering and design cost $3,490 by 
hired labor and $9,277 by contract. Supervision and 
inspection cost $2,365. Flood insurance study costs were 
$1,840 by hired labor. Rural improvement costs were $4,833 
by hired labor and $358,930 by contract. Refuge structures 
costs were $104,277 by hired labor and $3,639 by contract. 
Renville county park operation and maintenance manuals cost 
$455 by hired labor. Canadian dams construction review 
costs were $2,022. Lake Darling Dam improvement costs 
included an adjusted decrease of $-5,371,887 by contract 
and costs of $10,022,310 by hired labor. Flood warning 
systems costs were $56,670 by hired labor and $240,155 by 
contract. Study management costs were $513 by hired labor. 
Rural flowage easements costs were $2,528 by hired labor. 
Total costs, all Federal, were $5,653,524. Maintenance: 
Water quality analysis cost $19,275 by hired labor and water 
quality data collection analysis by other government agency 
cost $84,277. Supervision and inspection cost $9,823. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
channel and levee improvement work at Velva, Sawyer, 
Renville County Park and Burlington to Minot Stages 1, 2, 
and 3 is complete. Construction at Rafferty Dam is 
complete. Construction at Alameda Dam is complete. 
Construction on rural improvements Stage 1, road raises and 
acquisitions, is complete. Construction on improvements to 
Fish and Wildlife Service refuge dams is complete. Lake 
Darling Dam Stage 1 construction is complete. Lake Darling 
Dam Stage 2 construction is underway. 
24-17

REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
35. STATE ROAD AND EBNER COULEES, 
WI 
Location. In La Crosse County in west-central 
Wisconsin, on the south side of the City of La Crosse. (For 
general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) 
Existing project. The plan of improvement for local 
protection (flood control) consists of channel deepening and 
enlarging downstream from Hagen Bridge to the mouth of 
Pammel Creek and includes 13,600 feet of concrete-lined 
rectangular channel, a drop chute inlet structure, a side 
channel inlet structure, a stilling basin, a terminus structure, 
and three new street bridges. The upper 4,000 feet of 
rectangular channel is designed for supercritical flow and the 
remaining 9,600 feet of channel is designed for subcritical 
flow. The project provides Standard Project Flood (SPF) 
protection. The city replaced a fourth bridge in 1980 that 
was previously included in the authorized plan. The city also 
replaced a railroad bridge in 1985 that was also included in 
the authorized plan. In 1986, the city constructed 450 feet 
of rectangular channel in the downstream reach to SPF 
protection. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control 
Act (H. Doc. 360, 90th Cong., 2d sess., contains published 
map.) The 1992 Water Resources Development Act 
(WRDA) authorized a $1,467,000 reimbursement to the City 
of LaCrosse, Wisconsin for prior work. 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1969 for 
requirements. The local sponsor withdrew support for the 
project in 1976 citing increased non-Federal costs and lack 
of agreement on local cost sharing between three local units 
of government located within the project area. The project 
was reclassified as inactive on April 7, 1977, but was 
reactivated on November 8, 1978, after the La Crosse 
County Board of Supervisors, the La Crosse City Council, 
and the Town of Shelby passed separate resolutions on 
September 17, 1978, July 13, 1978, and July 10, 1978, 
respectively, which requested continuance of the project. A 
local cooperation agreement between the Department of the 
Army and the City of La Crosse, Wisconsin, for the 
construction of the State Road flood control project was 
entered into August 11, 1988. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Real estate costs were $8,355. Stage 3 construction 
contracts cost $13,825. Cultural resources cost $6,392 by 
hired labor and $21,399 by contract. Engineering and design 
cost $54,265 by hired labor. Construction management costs 
were $2,491 by hired labor. Total Federal costs were 
$92,295, non-Federal $14,432.: 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is 
complete. 
36. STERLING CENTER, MAPLE RIVER, 
MN 
Location. Along the left bank of the Maple River, Blue 
Earth County, about 85 miles southwest of Minneapolis, 
Minnesota. 
Existing project. Provide for erosion control along 
the west bank of the Maple River to protect County State Aid 
Highway No. 1. The project involves constructing a 
steepened slope and placing riprap along 160 feet of 
riverbank, the project was approved for construction in July 
1994, under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 
Flood Control Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1994 for 
requirements. The local cooperation agreement was executed 
between the Department of the Army and Blue Earth County 
on August 4, 1994. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: A construction contract cost $124,509. Study 
management cost $307. Engineering and design cost $2,865. 
Supervision and inspection cost $10,554 by hired labor and 
$574 by contract. Total Federal costs were $103,003, non- 
Federal, $35,806. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
project is essentially complete. 
37. ST. HILAIRE, RIVERSIDE CEMETERY, 
MN 
Location. Riverside Cemetery is located along the 
right bankline of the Red Lake River in Pennington County, 
Minnesota, approximately 2 miles north of St. Hilaire, 
Minnesota. St. Hilaire is approximately 40 miles east of 
East Grand Forks, Minnesota, and 315 miles northwest of 
Minneapolis, Minnesota. 
Existing project. The emergency streambank 
protection project at Riverside Cemetery involves placing 
approximately 1,600 cubic yards of rock fill along a 450-foot 
reach of the right bankline of the Red Lake River. The rock 
fill cross section would have a minimum thickness of 2.5 feet 
and would include a bench. There would be a 1 vertical to 
2 horizontal slope above the bench and a 1 vertical to 1.25 
horizontal slope below the bench to existing ground. The 
project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for 
construction 23 April 1993 under the authority contained in 
Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
was executed between the Federal Government and the Red 
24-18

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
Lake Watershed District on 10 June 1993. See Annual 
Report for 1994 for requirements. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: A construction contract cost $12,189. Miscellaneous 
project management costs were $675. Engineering and 
design cost $2,067 by hired labor. Supervision and 
inspection cost $802. Federal costs were $11,275 and non- 
Federal, $4,458. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for the 
emergency streambank protection project at Riverside 
Cemetery on the Red Lake River near St. Hilaire, Minnesota 
was awarded in February 1994. Construction of the project 
is complete. 
38. ST. PAUL, MN 
Location. In Ramsey County at St. Paul, Minnesota, 
on the Mississippi River. (For general location see 
Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) 
Previous project. For details see page 27-20 of 
Annual Report for 1974. 
Existing project. Since completion of the St. Paul and 
South St. Paul flood control project in 1964, the protected 
area has experienced two floods greater than the previous 
flood of record. The plan of protection provides for a 
nominal 4-foot barrier raise along the existing project 
alignment. Project was authorized by the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) and 
reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 
1990 (Public Law 101-640). 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for 
requirements. The local cooperation agreement was executed 
on August 22, 1991. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: Construction contract costs were $1,983,947. 
Engineering by hired labor cost $95,703 and by contract, 
$12,003. Construction management by contract cost $4,899 
and by hired labor, $256,260. Total Federal costs were 
$1,161,832 and non-Federal costs were $1,190,980. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of 
Stage 1 and Stage 2 is complete. Stage 3 is substantially 
complete. 
39. WABASHA COUNTY, COUNTY 
HIGHWAY 11, MN 
Location. Along the left bank of the Zumbro River, 
Wabasha County, about 65 miles southeast of Minneapolis, 
Existing project. Provide for erosion control along the 
north bank of the Zumbro River to protect County State Aid 
Highway 11. The project involves clearing and shaping the 
bank and placement of rock protection along 2,750 feet of 
riverbank. The project was approved by the Chief of 
Engineers for construction in April 1993 under the authority 
contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as 
amended. 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1993 for 
requirements. Wabasha County, Minnesota has agreed to 
serve as the non-Federal sponsor for this project. A Local 
Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army 
and the city of Wabasha was fully executed on 12 May 1993. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
Work: An adjustment was made on a construction contract 
for $-39,456. Construction management cost $990 by hired 
labor. Total Federal costs were $-32,625, non-Federal, 
$-5,841. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. 
complete. 
The project is 
40. WILD RICE RIVER, HENDRUM / LEE 
TOWNSHIPS, NORMAN COUNTY, MN 
Location. Along a 16-mile reach of the Wild Rice 
River in Norman County, Minnesota, about 200 miles 
northwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota. 
Existing project. Provide for flood damage reduction 
along the Wild Rice River. The project involves snagging 
and clearing the Wild Rice River from its confluence with 
the Red River of the North to a point 16 miles upstream. 
The project was approved for construction in April 1993, 
under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 
Flood Control Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1994 for 
requirements. The Wild Rice Watershed District agreed to 
serve as the non-Federal sponsor for this project. A Local 
Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army 
and Wild Rice Watershed District was executed on 3 August 
1993.
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Real estate cost $3,469. A construction contract cost 
$82,706. Construction management cost $15,132 by hired 
labor. Total Federal costs were $80,912, non-Federal, 
$20,395. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for the 
flood control project at Hendrum and Lee Townships was 
Minnesota. 
24-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
awarded in December, 1993. The project was 95 percent 
complete at the end of the fiscal year. 
41. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
Flood control projects turned over to local interests 
were inspected to determine that project channels are kept 
clean and unobstructed, dikes and revetments are in good 
condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. 
Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted. (See Table 
24-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) 
Cost for the period was $94,760. Total cost to 
September 30, 1995, is $1,595,260. 
Miscellaneous 
42. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORITY 
In the Aquatic Plant Control program (Section 302, 
Public Law 298, 89th Congress) study and program 
management cost $250,513 by hired labor. Contract for 
aquatic plant control operations at Buffalo Lake, Wisconsin 
cost $90,666. 
Condition and operation studies for removal of silt and 
aquatic growth in Sauk Lake, Minnesota (Section 602, Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986) cost $106 by hired 
labor. Total Federal costs for the Sauk Lake project were 
$106. 
Emergency work performed in response to the 1993 
Midwest flooding (FY 1993 Emergency Supplemental 
Appropriations Act, Public Law 103-75) included riprap 
repair at Mississippi River locks and dams and bank erosion 
repair at the Lake City small boat harbor. An adjustment 
was made for work carried out under this authority that 
amounted to $-21,736. 
43. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL 
EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) 
Disaster Preparedness 
Emergency Operations 
Rehabilitation 
Total FC & CE 
44. NATIONAL EMERGENCY 
PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) 
Mobilization Preparedness 
Continuity of Government Preparedness 
Emergency Facilities 
Total NEPP 
$ 24,885 
42,976 
10.000 
$77,861 
45. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM 
Permit Evaluation 
Enforcement 
Environmental Impact Statements 
Total Regulatory 
$2,440,101 
1,077,519 
482,933, 
$4,000,553 
General Investigations 
46. SURVEYS 
Fiscal year cost was $2,191,435 which included four 
flood damage prevention studies, two special studies, 
miscellaneous activities, and coordination with both Federal 
and non-Federal agencies. Table 24-M provides a specific 
list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 
47. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC 
DATA 
Fiscal year cost was $223,072 which included the items 
concerning international water studies, flood plain 
management services and hydrologic studies. Table 24-M 
provides a specific list and respective fiscal year 
expenditures. 
48. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
Fiscal year cost was $39,331 which included three local 
protection projects. Table 24-M provides a specific list and 
respective fiscal year expenditures. For details of the 
individual projects see Sections 15, 21, and 24. 
$255,383 
170,034 
122,163' 
$547,580 
'Excludes $42,643 contributed funds for maintenance. 
24-20

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost to 
Section September 30, 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 1995 
Minnesota River, MN 
Reservoirs at Headwaters 
of Mississippi River, MN 
5. Warroad Harbor 
and River, MN 
6. Zipple Bay, Lake of the 
Woods County, MN 
7. St. Croix River, 
Stillwater, MN 
8. Bassett Creek, MN 
9. Big Fork River, MN 
10. Big Stone Lake and 
Whetstone River, MN 
and SD 
11. Chaska, MN 
12. Eau Galle River, WI 
1. 
3. 
11,000 28,000 
10,841 21,669 
13,941 
20,826 
- $2,057,722 
- 2,057,7221 
3,000 2,800,038 
2,965 2,800,038 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maj. Rehab: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Dam Safety: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
- 323,000 
- 70,421 
-1,100 
435 56 
36,330 
281,537 
-5,000 1,575,779 
2,079 1,575,488 
- 515,000 
- 515,000 � 
- 25,000 
- 24,939 
- 2,400,000 
- 285,152 
60,941 
60,880 
- 2,400,000 
489,875 775,027 
1,654,000 1,321,000 905,000 617,000 29,339,000 
1,841,549 711,848 1,120,823 767,958 29,089,935 s 
15,000 
4,828 
15,000 
4,260 
-8,000 
7,369 
63,000 
46,903 
85,000 
63,360 
- - - -1,000 12,174,000 
- - - -915 12,174,0006 
157,000 189,000 274,000 474,000 4,015,954 
144,152 204,986 260,061 390,002 3,910,867 
916,000 3,898,000 4,785,000 2,104,000 24,061,000 
950,558 1,436,192 3,575,644 5,261,425 23,545,371' 
- - - - 9,039,250 
- - - - 9,039,250 
627,000 433,000 485,150 479,500 9,660,240 
567,097 491,360 499,734 486,496 9,658,237 
24-21
- - - - 4,398,628 
- - - - 4,398,6282 
2,536,000 2,771,000 3,529,305 3,071,000 46,856,660 
2,576,153 2,586,893 3,332,614 3,403,215 46,749,6143 
- - - - 425,000 
- - - - 425,000 
- - - 300,000 300,000 
- - - 12,901 12,901 
- - - - 86,105 
- - - - 86,105

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 24-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost to 
Section September 30, 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 1995 
13. Gilmore Creek, 
Winona, MN 
14. Homme Lake and 
Dam, ND 
15. Houston, MN 
16. Lac qui Parle Lakes, MN 
17. La Farge Lake and Channel 
Imp., WI 
18. Lake Ashtabula and 
Baldhill Dam, 
Sheyenne River, ND 
19. Lake Traverse and Bois 
de Sioux River, SD 
and MN 
20. Mankato and North 
Mankato, MN 
21. Marshall, MN 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Dam Safety: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Dam Safety: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
- 280,000 102,000 1,225,000 2,252,000 
158,742 176,079 167,204 1,145,265 2,133,5068 
25,000 
8,939 394 5,863 
-10,000 1,419,097 
642 1,419,0979 
105,000 188,000 350,000 190,000 3,448,556 
106,578 175,989 351,592 206,995 3,446,408 
- - - 300,000 300,000 
- - - 290,665 290,665 
340,000 217,000 
338,239 199,752 
- 264,768 2,064,768 
13,029 256,366 2,037,350 
- - - - 964,873 
- - - - 964,873 
443,000 526,000 667,000 525,000 9,454,908 
474,521 503,419 681,448 534,725 9,447,037 
- - - - 18,642,000 
- - - - 18,642,000 
79,000 35,000 114,000 
81,092 30,781 116,079 
36,000 603,457 
40,106 602,192 
3,325,638 
3,325,638 10 
1,151,000 1,184,000 771,000 1,126,000 21,586,531 
1,171,241 1,029,052 945,320 1,144,802 21,581,859 
- - 689,000 2,429,000 3,118,000 
- - 589,309 2,038,691 2,628,000 
100,000 500,000 1,145,000 6,692,000 10,718,000 
-9,424 509,201 661,346 3,806,561 7,245,902" 
- - - - 1,339,727 
- - - - 1,339,727 
413,000 489,000 378,000 531,000 6,776,032 
399,599 402,936 444,600 555,258 6,763,842 
- -15,000 
-321,510 93,741 
25,000 182,000 
24,292 179,450 
-290,000 
5,727 
25,000 
21,612 
20,000 96,985,500 
3,134 96,954,23912 
- 2,777,866 
4,893 2,776,0791s 
24-22

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
TABLE 24-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost to 
Section September 30, 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 1995 
22. Minnesota River at 
Belgrade, MN 
23. Minnesota River at 
Henderson, MN 
24. Portage, WI 
25. Red Lake River, MN, 
including Clearwater 
River, MN 
26. Red Lake River, 
Polk County, Crookston, MN 
27. Red River of the North 
Drainage Basin, MN, 
SD and ND 
28. Rochester, MN 
29. Roseau River, MN 
30. Sanders Creek, 
Boscobel, WI 
31. Sheyenne River, ND 
32. Snake River, 
Alvarado, MN 
33. Sogn, MN 
34. Souris River Basin, ND 
35. State Road & Ebner 
Coulees, WI 
36. Sterling Center, MN 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
30,000 53,000 228,000 -60,000 261,000 
25,216 63,803 181,472 -10,790 261,000' 
10,248 
60,000 
933 9,754 
481,000 506,000 162,000 
480,801 388,629 254,928 
75,000 1,982,500 
57,158 1,914,304's 
-9,000 1,919,000 
13,683 1,915,943 
- - - - 3,120,079 
- - - - 3,120,07916 
93,000 100,000 417,000 590,000 2,544,627 
85,482 70,610 235,336 800,129 2,532,517 
- 14,000 
- 13,479 
3,000 55,000 
6,006 37,334 
25,000 
21,644 
69,000 
92,853 
101,000 
27,916 
140,000 
63,039 
29,000 8,324,984 
22,120 8,316,51717 
433,000 457,000 580,000 513,000 7,261,386 
426,183 458,237 445,127 663,093 7,258,182 
9,445,000 11,153,000 22,709,000 -3,115,451 69,064,549 
9,426,457 11,070,197 13,652,648 4,455,595 67,474,88318 
- 15,000 
61,799 24,084 
- 1,004,000 
41,546 770,281 
2,491 
35,000 
232,742 
1,000 2,341,000 
3,190 2,339,77319 
- 1,411,500 
36,103 1,411,46620 
3,018,000 676,000 345,000 546,000 21,774,000 
3,050,300 494,219 443,253 623,164 21,698,77821 
- 888,000 280,000 
265,130 761,453 334,616 
- - 33,000 
- - 28,766 
-35,000 1,738,000 
22,174 1,720,001 2 
21,000 
5,770 
54,000 
34,536 
22,500,000 6,225,000 13,212,000 846,000 101,787,000 
22,613,290 5,018,050 2,581,107 5,653,524 94,574,7332 
67,000 70,000 96,000 113,000 346,000 
59,896 74,358 97,412 113,375 345,041 
4,608,000 2,698,000 1,467,000 -200,000 21,617,000 
4,630,130 2,132,653 1,797,678 92,295 21,608,02224 
- 20,000 46,000 100,000 166,000 
- 10,339 50,840 103,003 164,182 
24-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 24-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost to 
Section September 30, 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 1995 
37. St. Hilaire, MN New Work: 
Approp. - 38,000 73,000 - 146,000 
Cost 25,828 27,963 71,395 11,275 145,2146 
38. St. Paul, MN New Work: 
Approp. 1,714,000 3,797,000 4,985,000 400,000 13,034,000 
Cost 1,740,367 3,304,632 4,686,200 1,161,832 12,940,19127 
39. Wabasha, County New Work: 
Hwy 11, MN Approp. 20,000 40,000 274,000 -76,000 273,000 
Cost 20,986 37,397 234,602 -32,625 273,000" 
40. Wild Rice River, New Work: 
Hendrum/Lee, MN Approp. - 37,200 269,000 -15,000 303,200 
Cost 2,678 26,758 176,579 80,912 296,1509 
'Includes $117,542 for new work for previous project. Excludes 
$359,202 contributed funds. 
2Includes $681,805 for new work for previous projects. 
3Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. 
4Excludes $307,556 contributed funds. 
5Excludes $2,035,274 contributed funds. In addition, $487,157 in 
other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. 
6Excludes $152,492 contributed funds. In addition, $487,491 in 
other contributed funds have been expended for work under 
Government contract paid for by the Ottertail Power Company. 
7Excludes $3,528,247 contributed funds. In addition, $159,547 in 
other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. 
8Excludes $8,220 contributed funds. 
9Excludes $56,220 contributed funds. Includes $23,000 expended 
during FY 91 - FY 95 under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 
authority. Excludes also $7,453 contributed funds under Section 
1135 authority. 
"oExcludes $208,000 contributed funds. 
"Excludes $119,000 contributed funds. 
12Excludes $79,537 contributed funds. 
13Excludes $1,802,866 for new work for previous project. 
14Excludes $68,421 contributed funds. 
'SExcludes $284,726 contributed funds. 
16Excludes $30,020 contributed funds. 
7"Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit $11,239, which 
is classed as "deferred" and the units on which authorization has 
expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorhead, $27,700; Sheyenne, 
$37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 
in other contributed funds have been expended for work under 
Government contract paid for by local interests. Excludes $57,214 
contributed funds for work under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 
authority. 
8Excludes $6,577,908 contributed funds. In addition, $786,444 in 
other contributed funds have been expended for betterments and 
$4,198,430 for relocations accomplished under a government 
contract but which are a non-Federal responsibility. 
19Excludes $65,902 contributed funds. 
2"Excludes $169,385 contributed funds. In addition, $52,643 in 
other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. 
21Excludes $1,150,000 sunk costs for deauthorized Kindred Lake 
unit (see Table 24-G.) Excludes $419,318 contributed funds for 
Horace to West Fargo unit and $1,002,872 for West Fargo unit. 
2Excludes $93,891 contributed funds. 
23Excludes $4,919,000 sunk costs for deferred Lake Darling Dam 
unit (see Table 24-E) and $5,679,113 contributed funds. 
24Excludes $225,000 sunk costs for inactive Ebner Coulee unit (see 
Table 24-E) and $4,142,828 contributed funds. 
2Excludes $35,806 contributed funds. 
26Excludes $26,869 contributed funds. 
7Excludes $3,884,350 contributed funds. In addition, $248,476 in 
other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. 
2Excludes $73,619 contributed funds. 
29Excludes $65,395 contributed funds. 
24-24

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Sec. Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
1. MINNESOTA RIVER, MN 
July 13, 1892 Open-channel improvement from mouth to Shakopee to obtain a Annual Report 1891. 
channel of 4-foot depth to accommodate vessels with 3-foot draft. P. 2209 
July 3, 1958 Dredging to provide channel of 9-foot depth from mouth to S. Doc. 144. 84th. 
mile 14.7 Cong., 2nd sess. 1 
3. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN 
March 3, 1899 Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine 
extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. 
March 2, 1907 Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. 
June 25, 1910 Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech H. Doc. 363, 61st 
Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project Cong., 2nd sess. 
abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915.) 
July 27, 1916 Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and H Doc. 413, 64th 
Gull Lake. Cong., 1 sess. 
June 26, 19342 Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War 
Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. 
5. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MN 
March 3, 1899 Dredging bar at mouth of Warroad River. Specified in Act. 
June 6, 1900 Entrance channel 300 feet wide and 7 feet deep. H. Doc. 92, 56th 
Cong., 2d sess.4 
June 13, 19023 
March 3, 1905 Enlarging turning basin. H. Doc. 703, 61st 
Cong., 2d sess. 4 
June 25, 1910 
July 25, 1912 Deepening to 8 feet 
August 5, 1977 Deauthorized portion of entrance channel and turning basin to Public Law 93-251 
complete project width and depth. 
'Contains latest published map. 
2Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 
3Appropriation 
4Latest published map is opposite p. 1984 in Annual Report for 
1911. 
24-25

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 24-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to September 30. 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation 
Project Status Report for Construction and Maintenance 
Baudette Harbor, MN Completed 1961 $36,415 $57,768 
Black River, WI 1 1950 67,585- 
Lake Traverse, MN and SD '' 1921 92- 
Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN Completed3 1929 277,615 40,251 
Mississippi River between Brainerd 
and Grand Rapids, MN S 1925 47,794 3,891 
Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN Completed 1978 38,700 102,196 
Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN Completed3 1923 9,070- 
Red River of the North, MN and ND 3,6 1921 293,344 76,209 
St. Croix River, MN and WI Completed 1991 150,410 1,183,355 
Wisconsin River, WI 2,3 1888 - - 
Zippel Bay Harbor, MN Inactive 1928 27,941 11,139 
'Existing channel adequate for commerce (see Table 24-G for 
deauthorized portion of project.) 
2Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin River, WI'. 
Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin River by channel 
contraction works recommended in 1886 and 1887 (H. Doc. 65, 
49th Cong., 2nd sess.) Expenditures included under 'Fox and 
Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. No breakdown available. 
3No commerce reported. 
4Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, 64th Cong., 
1st sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong 1st sess.) 
5Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th 
Cong. 1st sess.) 
6Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, 63d Cong., 
3d sess.) 
7Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc., 69th Cong. 
1st Sess.) 
24-26

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
TABLE 24-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation 
Project Status Report for Construction and Maintenance 
Black Bear & Miller Lakes, Crow Wing Cty, MN2 
Black River at North Bend, WI' 
Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND' 
Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND 
Cannon River at Faribault, MN' 
Cochrane Drainage Ditch, WI 
Devils Lake, ND2 
Dry Run, IA 
Elk River, MN 
Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, MN2 
Enderlin, Maple River, ND2 
Grafton Pumping Station, ND' 
Grand Mound, State Historic Site, MN' 
Guttenberg, IA 
Hanover, Hennepin County, MN' 
Irving Township, Jackson County, WI' 
Irving Township at Nicols Road, 
Jackson County, WI' 
Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI' 
Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN' 
Lake Darling Dam, ND 
Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN 2 
Lost River, MN 
Lower Branch Rush River, ND2 
Mahnomen, Wild Rice River, MN' 
Middle River at Argyle, MN2 
Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN' 
Minneota, MN 2 
Minot, ND 
Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN 
Pembina River, ND 
Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI' 
Plum Creek, New Haven Township, MN3 
Prairie du Chien, WI 
Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN 
Red Lake River at Huot, MN' 
Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN' 
Red Lake River, State Hwy 32, MN' 
Red River of the North at Argusville, ND2 
Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN' 
Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN' 
Red River of the North at Fargo, ND-Moorhead, 
MN3 
Red River of the North at Halstad, MN2 
Red River of the North at Oslo, MN 2 
Red River of the North at Pembina, ND2 
Redwood River below Marshall, MN2 
Root River at Hokah, MN' 
Rushford, MN 
Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN' 
Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND' 
Souris River, Velva, ND' 
St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Deferred 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Deferred 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Active 4 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
1988 
1985 
1983 
1991 
1992 
1966 
1970 
1992 
1990 
1990 
1992 
1974 
1988 
1984 
1986 
1987 
1989 
1987 
1991 
1967 
1974 
1993 
1986 
1963 
1983 
1957 
1983 
1989 
1991 
1991 
1984 
1984 
1993 
1990 
1990 
1992 
1986 
1984 
1979 
1960 
1992 
1980 
1985 
1988 
1988 
1974 
$471,000 
74,000 
58,500 
5,568,600 s 
62,5856 
37,182 
2,732,000 
1,790,759 
259,700 ' 
343,000 9 
4,000,00010 
92,8651" 
242,00012 
2,361,915 
259,500 
189,600 
158,500 
33,000 
61,326is 
4,919,00014 
1,353,478 Is 
517,51916 
1,000,00017 
85,400 
2,360,000 
250,000"8 
161,545 
21,479,50019 
1,675,835 
62,7622 
31,100 
3,529,000 
311,00021 
64,500 
131,000 
151,66522 
1,534,000 
85,665 2s 
27,500 
226,50024 
2,012,000 
1,960,200 
2,000,000 
202,400 
239,6272 
3,192,333 
250,00026 
111,000 
137,500 
8,476,01227 
24-27

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 24-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation 
Project Status Report for Construction and Maintenance 
Twin Valley Lake, MN Inactive 1988 2,115,700 - 
Upper Iowa River, IA Completed 1964 888,445 - 
Velva, ND2 Completed 1970 334,628 - 
Vermillion River, Hastings, MN2 Completed 1980 999,900 - 
Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Completed 1985 182,000 - 
Hastings, MN' 
Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN' Completed 1993 113,7002 - 
Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN' Completed 1987 250,000 - 
Warner Road, Sibley Street, Mississippi River, Completed 1992 500,000 - 
St. Paul, MN 
Wild Rice River, Mahnomen County, MN' Completed 1986 58500 
Wild Rice River, Mahnomen, MN3 Completed - 86,568 
Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN Completed 1989 5,620,700 - 
Winona, MN Completed 1989 32,741,1313" - 
Zumbro River at Genoa, MN' Completed 1992 34,50031 - 
Zumbro River, MN Completed 1975 1,284,100 - 
Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN' Completed 1990 141,44032 - 
'Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project 
authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 
2Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project 
authority, Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 
3Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project 
authority, Section 208, Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 
4Preconstruction planning has not started. Phase I completed under 
General Investigations. 
5Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with 
authorization of Lake Darling project. Additional authorization 
required for implementation of recommended plan. The Senate 
Report 97-256 states that the Corps is to take no further action to 
construct Burlington Dam until directed to do so by Congress. 
6Excludes $18,362 contributed funds. 
7Excludes $42,766 contributed funds. 
8In addition $87,878 was expended from Public Law 99 funds in 
the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and incorporation into 
the permanent project. 
9Excludes $201,544 contributed funds. 
0Excludes $150,191 contributed funds. 
"Excludes $27,583 contributed funds. 
2Excludes $77,290 contributed funds. 
13Excludes $20,441 contributed funds. 
'4Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with 
authorization of Souris River Basin Project (see Section 31 and 
Table 24-A for costs for active project). 
'5Excludes $74,225 contributed funds. 
16Excludes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which 
authorization expired in April 1966 (see Table 24-G). Excludes 
$246,911 contributed funds. 
"7Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. 
'8Excludes $130,300 contributed funds. 
'9Excludes $4,167 contributed funds. 
20Excludes $20,920 contributed funds. 
21Excludes $92,402 contributed funds. 
2Excludes $35,430 contributed funds. 
3Excludes $26,055 contributed funds. 
24Excludes $61,895 contributed funds. 
SExcludes $67,014 contributed funds. 
"Excludes $62,620 contributed funds. 
27Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new work and $38,000 
expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of required cash 
contribution. Excludes an additional $206,629 expended for work 
done at request of local interests. 
"Excludes $37,631 contributed funds. 
29Excludes $184,709 contributed funds. 
3Excludes $589,316 contributed funds. In addition, $717,809 in 
other contributed funds have been expended for work under 
Government contract paid for by local interests. 
31Excludes $11,066 contributed funds. 
32Excludes $38,173 contributed funds. 
24-28

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
TABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Date Funds Funds 
Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Black River, WI' 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 -- 
Black River Lake, WI 1950 Aug. 5 1977 -- 
Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND 1983 Sep. 13, 1994 $5,568,6002 - 
Grafton, ND 1983 Nov. 18, 1991 -- 
Hudson Harbor, WI3 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 -- 
Kindred Lake, ND4 1987 Nov. 17, 1986 1,150,000- 
La Crosse, WI5 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 -- 
Lake Darling Dam, ND 1987 Sep. 13, 1994 4,919,000 6 - 
Maple River, ND7 1981 Oct. 6, 1961 1,241- 
Moorhead, MN7 1981 Oct. 30, 1961 27,700- 
Pembina River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 50,000- 
Ruffy Brook, MN 1967 Apr. 1966 46,034- 
Sheyenne River, ND7 1981 Dec. 31, 1970 37,956- 
State Road and Ebner Coulees 1981 Jul. 9, 1995 225,000- 
(Ebner Coulee Unit) 
Tongue River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 23,695- 
Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, MN 1974 Nov. 17, 1986 182,000- 
Warroad Harbor and River, MN 8 1981 Aug. 5, 1977 -- 
'Portion of project for removal of obstructions at various points 
outside the dredged area to clear channel to full project width (see 
Table 24-C for costs for completed portion of the project). 
2Advance engineering and design costs only. The Senate Report 
97-256 states that the Corps is to take no further action to construct 
Burlington Dam until directed to do so by Congress. 
3Part of the St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin project. 
;Previously part of Sheyenne River, ND project (see Section 31 and 
Table 24-A for costs for active project). 
5Authorized for further study by a House Committee on Public 
Works Resolution dated March 15, 1988. 
6Advance engineering and design costs only. (See Section 34 and 
Table 24-A for costs for active project). 
'Part of Red River of the North Drainage Basin (see Section 27 in 
text and Table 24-I for costs for active units of project). 
8Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to 
complete project width and depth (see Table 24-C for costs for 
completed portion of project). 
24-29

TABLE 24-H RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 
(See Section 3 of Text) 
Outlet Watershed Area (Square miles) Capacity Previous Projects Existing Projects 
at 
Minimum Above Watershed Maximum 
Stages St. Paul (Square Original Stage Total 
Reservoir (feet) ' River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) Completed Cost Completed Cost Cost 
Winnibigoshish 6 Mississippi 408 1442 117 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387,470 
Leech Lake 0 Leech 410 1163 173 205.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,380 256,185 
Pokegama 6 Mississippi 344 6602 24 35.0 120,750 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211,030 
Sandy Lake 7 Sandy 267 421 8 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231,020 
Pine River 9 Pine 199 562 18 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230,320 
Gull Lake 5 Gull 168 287 20 20.5 70,820 - - 1913 86,826 86,826 
Surveys and flowage rights - - - - 160,939 160,939 
Recreational facilities - - - - 2,834,838 2,834,838 
Total new work - - 681,805 - 3,716,823 4,398,628 
Total operating and care - - 100,857 - 45,681,560 45,782,417 
Permanent indefinite - - - - 967,197 967,197 
appropriation for operation 
and care, Feb. 1, 1895 to end of 
fiscal year 1936 
Rehabilitation .... 425,000 425,000 
Total 2,152,840 - $782,662 - $49,084,775 $51,573,242 
'Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29, 1944. 
2Exclusive of area controlled by Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. 
0 
70 
O
0
t2 
n
77 
-I 
0
0O
0
"2 
0
a

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
TABLE 24-I RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: 
ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN 
(See Section 27 of Text) 
Cost to Total 
September 30, Estimated 
State Type 1995 Federal Cost 
Orwell River (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,7001 
Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 
Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,700 
Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 
Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,788 440,800 
Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 
Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and floodwall 948,895 948,900 
Red River at East Grand Forks Minnesota Levees, floodwall, 1,698,200 17,500,0002 
pumping plants 
Red River at Fargo North Dakota Channel improvement 1,639,924 1,639,9003 
Total Cost to Date $8,060,848* 
Total Estimate Cost $23,862,7005 
'Includes $181,713 for lands and $25,045 for recreation facilities. 
2The East Grand Forks unit was reclassified from active to inactive 
on August 19, 1988. The cost of this unit was last revised in 1987. 
3lncludes $67,900 for lands. 
Costs of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridgedeferred unit not 
included. Authorization of the Sheyenne River, Moorhead, and 
Maple River units has expired. Cost of these units also not 
included total $66,897. 
sThe Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is classed as 
'deferred' and is excluded from the estimate. The cost of this unit, 
last revised in 1955, was estimated to be $666,000. The Flood 
Control Act approved December 31, 1970 (H. Doc. 330-91-2) 
provided for deletion of the Sheyenne River unit, and authorization 
of the Maple River and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 
5-year period within which local interests were required to furnish 
assurances of local cooperation. Authorization of these units, not 
included, expired on the dates indicated in Table 24-G. In FY 89, 
the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit was included as part of the 
General Investigation program under Restudy of Deferred projects. 
24-31

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 24-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 41 of Text) 
Project 
Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD ......................................... 
Black Bear and Miller Lakes, Crow Wing County, MN ..................................... 
Black River, (North Bend), W I .................................................... 
Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND ....................................................... 
Cannon River at Faribault, M N..................................................... 
Dry Run, IA ............................................... .. .............. 
Emerson, Manitoba- Noyes, MN .................................................. 
Enderlin, M aple River, ND ...................................................... 
Grafton, N D .......................................................... ..... 
Grand Mound, State Historic Site, MN ............................................... 
Guttenberg, IA .............................................................. 
Irving Township, Jackson County, WI................................................ 
Irving Township at Nicols Road, Jackson County, WI ...................................... 
Kickapoo River, Gays M ills, W I ................................................... 
Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN ..................... . ..... . .................... 
Mahnomen, Wild Rice River, MN .............. ................... .................. 
Middle River at Argyle, MN ............................................... ......... 
M inneota,M N .............................................................. 
Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN................................................... 
Pettibone Park, La Crosse, W I .................................................... 
Prairie du Chien, W I ...................................... ................... 
Red Lake River, Gentilly, M N .................................................... 
Red Lake River at Huot, M N ..................................................... 
Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN................................................ 
Red Lake River, State Hwy 32, MN.................................................. 
Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN ........................................... 
Red River of the North at Argusville, ND ............................................. 
Red River of the North at Fargo, ND-Moorhead, MN ...................................... 
Red River of the North at Halstad, ND ............................................... 
Red River of the North at Oslo, MN ................ ................................ 
Red River of the North at Pembina, ND ..................................... ......... 
Redwood River below Marshall, MN ................................................ 
Root River at Hokah, M N ......................................................... 
Rushford,M N ... ............................................ ............... 
Shepard Road, Mississippi River, MN................................................. 
Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND .................................................. 
Snake River at Alvarado, M N ..................................................... 
Souris River, Velva, ND ......................................................... 
Upper Iowa River, M N .............................................. ........... 
V elva,N D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .. . . ... . .. ... ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . 
Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN .................................. 
Vermillion River, Hastings, MN ................... ................................ 
Wabasha County, County Hwy 11, MN................................................ 
Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN .......................................... 
Warner Road, Sibley Street, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN ................................. 
W inona, M N. ............................................................... 
Zumbro River, M N ........................................................... 
Zumbro River at Genoa, M N ..................................................... 
Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN.............................................. 
November 1994 
September 1995 
September 1995 
October 1994 
September 1995 
November 1994 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
November 1994 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
November 1994 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
November 1994 
September 1995 
November 1994 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
October 1994 
September 1995 
October 1994 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
November 1994 
September 1995 
September 1995 
September 1995 
24-32 
Date Inspected 
1~

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
TABLE 24-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 
80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) 
Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs 
Avoca, WI ....... ........... .... ................................................ . $2,202 
Chippewa River, Montevideo, MN ........................... ................. .............. 70 
Crow River, Rockford, MN ........ ..... ............................................... . 7,628 
Elk River, Lake Orono, MN .................... ........................................... 12,255 
Garvin Brook, Stockton, MN .......... ...... ............................ .................. 3,525 
Grand Rapids, WI.................. ........................................... ........ 1,690 
Kawishiwi River, MN ............................... ............................ ............. 1,502 
Lac Qui Parle, MN ....... ......... ......... .......................................... 30 
Morais River, ND ........................................................................ 5,886 
Perley, M N ........................ ......... . ..... ............................. 39,089 
Red River of the North, Grand Marais Outlet, MN.......................................... 18,063 
Wild Rice, Marsh Rivers, MN ................... ..................................... 5,765 
Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 
the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) 
Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs 
Big Fork River, M N ........................................................... $46,903 
Clayton, IA ... ............... .................................................. 1,526 
Hennepin County, CSAH 116, MN ......................... ............................ 14,320 
Kingston Township, M N ........ ................................................... 3,356 
Mankato Township, MN ....................... .................................... 36,772 
Manvel,ND .......... . ................ ... ................................... 3,315 
M elrose, W I .... ........................ ..................................... 17,561 
Orwell Lake and Vernon Center, MN.................................................. 12,190 
Red Lake River, Polk County, Crookston, MN ............................................ 27,916 
Red River of the North, Oxbow, ND .................................................... 985 
Roseau River, M N .............................................................. 3,332 
St. Clair, M N .................................. ................................. 65 
24-33

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 24-K (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood 
control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) 
Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs 
Lemonweor River, W I ................................ .......................... $11,898 
SouthTwoRiver,M N .............................................. ............. $1,161 
Snake River, Vega / Sandsville, MN ................................................... 6,172 
Snake River, W arren, M N ............................ . ................................ 213 
TABLE 24-L PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT 
OF ENVIRONMENT 
Modifications of projects for the purpose of improving the 
quality of the environment in the public interest 
(Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, as amended) 
Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs 
Coordination account funds ..................................................................... 2,270 
Initial appraisals, general .................................. ..... ............................... 7,125 
HommeLake, ND .................................................. . ............ $642 
Reservoirs at Headwaters, Mississippi River, MN 
Lake W innibigoshish ........................................................... 33,032 
OrwellLake,M N .............................................................. 22,120 
24-34

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 
TABLE 24-M GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
(See Sections 46, 47 and 48 of Text) 
Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs 
SURVEYS 
Flood Damage Prevention Studies 
Crookston,MN....................................................................... $151,425' 
Grand Forks, ND . ................ ....................................... 245,3302 
La Crosse, W I . .............................................................. 92 
Flood Plain Management Assessment, Upper Mississippi and Lower Missouri Rivers, 
IL, IA, KS, MN, MO, NE and WI.............................................. 820,890 
Special Studies 
Devils Lake, ND .................. ....................................... 172,169 
Environmental Services Partners ................................................ 58,252 
Miscellaneous Activities 
Special Investigations .... ....................................... ........ .. 81,989 
FERC Licensing Activities .... .............. ........... ........................... 7,585 
Intra Agency Water Resources Development ..................... ................... 38,827 
North American Waterfowl Management Plan ................... ...................... 5,107 
Coordination with Other Agencies 
Cooperation with Other Water Resource Agencies ...................................... 16,785 
Planning Assistance to States3: 
Minnesota ............................................................. 424,240 
North Dakota ............................................................. 35,306 
Wisconsin ........... ............................................. . ..... 133,438 
TOTAL SURVEYS ............................... ........................... $2,191,435 
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 
International W ater Studies ..................................................... $95,2074 
Flood Plain Management Services s 
Flood Plain Management Services Unit ............................................ 37,199 
Technical Services, General ................................................... 61,372 
Quick Responses ............................................................ 7,183 
Special Studies .. ......................................................... 59,962 
Hydrologic Studies 
Stream Flow Data ....... .......... . ........................ ................ 44,811 
TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA ................................... $223,072 
ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
Houston, M N ............................................................. $20,755 
M arshall, M N ............................................................... 4,893 
Portage, W I ............................................................... 13,683 
TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ....................................... $39,331 
'Excludes $146,974 contributed funds. 'Includes $82,662 for International Water Studies under O&M 
2Excludes $214,000 contributed funds. Appropriation. 
3Excludes $355,447 contributed funds 
24-35

MISSISSIPPI RIVER 
BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER 
AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN 
Section of river covered in this report is divided into three 
reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers 
at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis 
District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Missouri River to 
Location. Mississippi River rises in northern Minnesota, 
flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of 
Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 
miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad 
bridge, Minneapolis. The latest map and profile showing this 
section of river are in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 
3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 
511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis 
to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 
2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts 
(Bellevue, Iowa, to Missouri River) is in River and Harbors 
Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, 1st session. 
Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 
1963. 
Existing project. Provides for a channel of 9-foot depth 
and adequate width between mouth of Missouri River (1,179 
miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, 
by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented 
by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements 
at St. Paul to provide a 2.7 mile basin extending downstream 
from Robert Street Bridge, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate 
terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements 
and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, 
harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost 
of project, and authorizing legislation are given in Tables 
25-C, 25-D, 25-E and 25-G. All dams are concrete. Three 
dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, I and 19) are fixed, remainder 
are movable. See House Document 669, 76th Congress, 
3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers dated 
February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement 
of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and 
mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power 
development, flood control, and irrigation needs. 
Local cooperation. Small-boat harbors authorized in the 
River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that 
local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction 
(except in case of Quincy Harbor which involves 
maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and 
rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance; hold 
the United States free from damages; provide and maintain 
mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for 
transient small boats; accomplish all necessary relocations and 
alterations; and establish public bodies empowered to regulate 
use, growth and development of the harbors. 
Rectification of seepage damages to privately owned lands 
in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, was contingent 
upon the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, 
easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and 
Upper Mississippi River mile 300 above Ohio River; Rock 
Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; 
and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 
to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis (mile 857.6). 
maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions 
of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition 
Policies Act of 1970; accept, operate, and maintain 
the project upon its completion; and hold and save the United 
States free from damages arising from the construction and 
operation of the completed project; provided further that the 
local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in 
the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real 
estate and for payments required under Public Law 91-646 
if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved 
by the Government. 
Local cooperation requirements have been complied with 
for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; for 
improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; 
and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors 
at Rock Island, IL; Hannibal, MO; Fort Madison, IA; 
Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA (including 
freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, 
IL; Moline, IL; Clinton, IA; and Savanna, IL. 
Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects 
from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the 
United States for use of government dams for generation of 
hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. 
Treasury. (See Table 25-F for license fees collected through 
the end of the fiscal year.) 
St. Paul District. New Work: Studies were continued under 
Section 107, small navigation project authority for establishment 
of a small boat harbor at Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin 
at a cost of $25. 
Maintenance: Channel dredging to remove shoal areas was 
performed. Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. 
THOMPSON removed 632,504 cubic yards of material at 16 
locations at a cost of $2,766,284. Government derrick barge 
HAUSER/WADE removed 63,034 cubic yards of material 
at four locations at a cost of $257,057. Mechanical dredging 
contractors removed 618,432 cubic yards of material at 25 
locations at a cost of $2,045,732. Dredging surveys cost 
$741,501. The monitoring program at Weaver Bottoms cost 
$85,233. Hired labor work at McMillan Island totaled 
$410,474. Dredge material relocation at Indian Slough, 
disposal site restoration, and a contract for excavation at 
Reed's Landing cost $20,735, $99,869, and $1,084,998, 
respectively. A modification to the channel control structure 
at Dakota cost $233,204. Other dredging and snagging cost 
$238,701. 
Dam maintenance contracts totaled $122,067 and lock 
maintenance contracts cost $42,580. Contract costs for 
25-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
dewatering of locks totaled $592,422. A herbicide service contract 
cost $26,723. Contracts for aeration culverts at French 
Lake and Finger Lakes totaled $174,099. Contracts for boundary 
surveys, sandblasting and painting at Lock and Dam 7 
and machinery installation at Lock and Dam 5 cost $33,248, 
$353,007, and $1,169,999, respectively. Supply contracts for 
tainter gate machinery at Locks and Dams 4 and 10 totaled 
$1,612,640. Contracts for structural repair at Dam 5A, 
spillway repair at Onalaska and for crane carriers cost 
$26,534, $2,272,165, and $820,000, respectively. Contracts 
for dam apron rock protection at Lock and Dam 3, buss bar 
replacement at Lower St. Anthony Falls, and electrical correction 
at Lock and Dam 1 cost $127,140, $89,707, and 
$401,594, respectively. An engineering contract for the fixed 
crest at Lock and Dam 10 cost $1,200,033. A gate hoist 
machinery supply contract cost $69,550. A contract for controls 
at Lock and Dam 2 cost $2,524,786. Contracts for the 
Red Oak Island project, Lower St. Anthony Falls crane 
replacement, and equipment replacement cost $216,399, 
$244,999, and $58,826, respectively. Recreation renovation 
and maintenance contracts totaled $685,011. Engineering 
work and miscellaneous surveys, reports, and other work were 
carried on by hired labor for $3,318,013 and by contract for 
$317,880. Other miscellaneous hired labor, payments, supplies 
and equipment cost $9,257,000. The total cost of 
maintenance was $33,740,219. 
Rehabilitation: Contracts for machinery installation at 
Lock and Dam 8, lock machinery installation at Lock and 
Dam 9, construction at Lock and Dam 3, electrical rehabilitation 
for Lock and Dam 5A, and electrical rehabilitation at 
Lock and Dam 8 cost $1,024,167, $354,999, $27,844, $30,049 
and $207,546, respectively. Supply contracts for valve 
machinery at Lock and Dam 1, crane pickup booms, and for 
crane carriers cost $3,040, $107,999, and $1,431,999, respectively. 
A contract for dewatering at Lock and Dam 7 cost 
$447,893. Engineering, administration and other work were 
accomplished by hired labor for $789,044 and by contract for 
$15,836. Total rehabilitation costs were $4,040,416. 
Operating and care: Locks and dams were operated as required 
and necessary repairs were made thereto. Other studies, 
reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. 
Total cost of operating and care was $12,246,708. 
Costs to St. Paul were $25 for new work; $45,986,927 for 
operation and maintenance; and $4,040,416 for rehabilitation; 
for a total cost of $50,027,368. 
Rock Island District. New Work: None. 
Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government cutterhead 
pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed 
at various locations in Pools 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 
and 22 at a cost of $1,970,800 with 564,487 cubic yards of 
material being removed. Dredging inspection and reports were 
completed at a cost of $59,300. Snagging, clearing, and excavation 
was performed by hired labor at various locations 
at a cost of $188,300. Dredge material disposal activities and 
other environmental concerns in connection with dredging and 
channel maintenance activities cost $154,400. Repair of channel 
regulating works structures was performed at a cost of 
$3,723,000. Structural repairs, including sandblasting and 
painting were performed by hired labor at locks and dams 
at a cost of $4,553,500. Repairs to spillways and dikes cost 
$378,700. The Stage I contract for major maintenance to the 
dams at Lock and Dam 20 was initiated at a cost of $168,700. 
The work includes repairs to the structural compnents of the 
dams, placement of additional rock fill upstream and 
downstream of the gated sections of the dams, repairs to the 
spillways and removal of silt from the auxiliary lock bays. 
The Stage III major maintenance contract to the dam at Lock 
and Dam 16 was completed at a cost of $371,900. The Stage 
III major maintenance contract for electrical/mechanical 
system replacement at Lock and Dam 18 was completed at 
a cost of $65,800. The Stage III major maintenance contract 
for electrical/mechanical system replacement at Lock and 
Dam 16 was completed at a cost of $8,600. The replacement 
of gate of chains at Locks and Dams 21 and 22 was continued 
at a cost of $2,987,900. Sandblast, paint, and repairs to Dams 
13 and 15 continued at a cost of $925,300. Replace bridge 
decking at Locks and Dams 21 and 22 at a cost of $118,700. 
Replacement of air compressors at Locks and Dams 16-18, 
and 22 was initiated at a cost of $706,300. Replacing mooring 
buoys at the Locks and Dams cost $70,800. Repair concrete 
wall at upper Lock 19 at a cost of $533,300. Replacement 
of tow haulage units was continued at a cost of 
$349,800. Construction of Pleasant Creek boat ramp was 
completed at a cost fo $23,900. Electrical repairs at Thompson 
Causeway Campground were performed at a cost $25,400. 
The rehab at Fisherman's Corner Campground was continued 
at a cost of $47,600. Replacement of Fisherman's Corner 
valve vault cost $7,600. Replacement of fencing and water 
well at Lock and Dam 13 cost $23,700. Installation of lawn 
sprinkler system at Lock and Dam 15 cost $14,100. 
Maintenance of roads and bridges, buildings, grounds, and 
utilities cost $371,400. Maintenance of public use areas was 
performed at a cost of $669,800 and maintenance and purchase 
of permanent operating equipment cost $333,000. 
Maintenance of levees cost $25,600. Data collection platform 
equipment cost $13,900. Environmental compliance continued 
at a cost of $18,500. Water quality monitoring continued at 
a cost of $29,500. Real estate activities relating to maintenance 
were performed at a cost of $94,900. Engineering and design 
work was performed at a cost of $571,200, and as-built drawings 
continued at a cost of $43,700. Supervision, administration, 
and inspection for the maintenance features cost 
$903,200. Total maintenance costs were $20,552,100. Net 
credits to the project were $242,300, primarily as a result of 
collection from towboat companies for damages to lock and 
dam structures. 
Operation and care: Operation of the locks and dams and 
routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were performed 
at a cost of $11,662,600. Real estate management services 
were performed at a cost of $288,800. Natural and cultural 
resource activities were performed at a cost of $458,700. 
Public use areas and Mississippi River Visitors' Center were 
operated at a cost of $1,728,900 with contract law enforcement 
provided at a cost of $43,900. OSHA inspections and 
medical examinations were accomplished at a cost of $4,300. 
Surveys, various condition and operation studies and structural 
inspections cost $1,559,300. Water control management 
costs were $981,700 and the amount of $21,400 was expended 
on the Master Plans. Supervision and administration for 
operations features cost $576,600. Total operation costs were 
$17,326,200. 
25-2

MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN *
Total Operation and maintenance costs were $37,636,000. 
Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation was continued at Locks and 
Dams 13 and 15 for a cost of $3,675,006 and $5,481,987, 
respectively. Total rehabilitation costs were $12,541,993. 
Costs to the Rock Island District were $37,636,000 for 
operation and maintenance and $4,838,201 for major 
rehabilitation for a total cost of $42,474,201. 
St. Louis District. New Work: Costs incurred for Melvin 
Price Locks and Dam, formerly Lock and Dam 26 Replacement, 
were $78,246 for real estate acquistion; $7,095 for 
relocations; $649,294 for reservoirs; $907,926 for the dam; 
$4,090,174 for the lock; $2,150,001 for channels; $378,237 
for recreation; $2,898,865 for buildings, grounds and utilities; 
$141,396 for permanent operating equipment; $1,411,295 for 
engineering; and, $674,276 for supervision and administration. 
Costs incurred for the second lock were $824,880 for 
the lock, $91,415 for channels, $47,188 for permanent 
operating equipment, $280,513 for engineering, and $400,429 
for supervision and administration. Total cost of new work 
was $15,031,230. 
Rehabilitation: Major rehabilitation continued in FY 1995 
at Lock and Dam 25 with construction contracts and the 
preparation of contract documents at a cost of $7,486 for 
realestate acquisition, $509,813 on the dam, $400,000 for a 
bridge, $1,063,897 for engineering, and $30,143 for supervision 
and administration. Total rehabilitation cost $2,011,339. 
Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as 
required and necessary repairs were made thereto. Other work 
accomplished was management of natural resources, operation 
of recreation areas, condition and operation studies, 
water control management, and other studies and reports for 
a cost of $6,130,146. 
Maintenance: Total maintenance cost $3,609,840. 
Costs to the St. Louis District were $15,031,229 for new 
work on the Melvin Price Locks and Dam; $2,011,339 for 
major rehabilitation, $9,739,986 for operation and 
maintenance for a total cost of $26,782,554. 
Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling 
depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths 
suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained 
in all pools. 
St. Paul District. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. 
Anthony Falls and 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively 
minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels 
and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; commercial harbors 
at Lake City, Red Wing, and Winona, MN; and Prairie 
du Chien, WI; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red 
Wing, Wabasha, Lake City and Winona, MN; Lansing, IA; 
and Bay City, Pepin, and Prairie du Chien, WI; a remedial 
drainage ditch at Cochrane, WI; miscellaneous channel dredging 
and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction 
of various facilities for recreation use. Seepage 
damages totaling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. 
Status of land and flowage acquisition; Approximately 
50,293.54 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used 
by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a 
cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of 
15,549.63 acres of land are owned or controlled in pools 1 
to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. In addition, fee title 
to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 2.98 acres of land 
for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 
acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department 
of the Army holds special rights over 62,954.74 acres owned 
by the Department of the Interior in pool Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. 
Land acquisition is complete. 
Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul 
District: None. 
Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling 
depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths for 
long haul common carrier service were maintained in all 
pools. 
Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction 
items including all locks and dams, are completed and in 
operation. The following related work has also been completed: 
construction of small-boat harbors at Rock Island, 
IL; Moline, IL; Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Fort Madison, 
IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA; Clinton, 
IA; and Hanibal, MO; improvement of Beaver Slough at 
Clinton, IA, for navigation; improvement of commercial harbor 
at Dubuque, IA; rehabilitation of old auxiliary lock at 
Lock and Dam 14; permanent closure of old Lock 19 and 
drydock; rock and conglomerate excavation in Pools 15 and 
16; rectification of seepage damage in the Sny Island Levee 
Drainage District, IL; recreational facilities; and construction 
of visitor center at Lock and Dam 15. 
Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisition of land 
in Pools 11 to 22, inclusive consisting of 93,601 acres in fee 
and 10,541 acres in flowage easement, has been completed. 
Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling 
depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths 
suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained 
in all pools. 
Work remaining to complete portion of project in Rock 
Island District: None. 
St. Louis District. Work completed: Locks and Dams 24, 
25, and Melvin Price Locks and Dam, except for guidewall 
extensions at Locks 24 and 25, have been completed as have 
recreation facilities at the three pools. Payments for rectification 
of damages have been completed. Other work remaining 
consists of constructing guidewall extensions at Locks 24 
and 25. Melvin Price Locks and Dam is under construction. 
Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisitions of land 
in Pools 24, 25, and 26, involving 4,448 acres of land in fee 
and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total 
of 4,201 acres has been acquired for the Melvin Price Locks 
and Dam project. 
Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling 
depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable 
widths for long-haul common carrier services were maintained 
in all pools and between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and 
Missouri River. 
25-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Louis 
District: Work remaining on the Melvin Price Locks and Dam 
project includes completion of the third stage, (600 foot lock 
and 1 gatebays of the dam). Other work includes construction 
of miscellaneous alterations to the lock and administration/
maintenance building, a visitor center, minimum 
facilities for public health and safety and West Alton Access 
Area rehabilitation, removal of a lockwall at old Locks and 
Dam No. 26 and construction of recreation facilities at Alton, 
IL. Approximately 3 acres remain to be acquired for project 
TABLE 25-A COST AND FINAN 
navigation purposes. 
Total Federal Costs of existing project to the end of fiscal 
year 1995 for the three Districts were $126,987,915; 
$15,031,254 for new work; $93,362,913 regular funds for 
operation and maintenance; and $18,593,748 regular funds 
for rehabilitation. 
ICIAL STATEMENT 
Total Cost to 
Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 September 1995 
Mississippi River New Work' 
between Missouri River Approp. 2 $62,790,000 $43,010,000 $21,611,108 $ 7,433,000 $1,176,965,629 
and Minneapolis, Cost3 62,789,022 2,780,487 11,611,108 15,031,229 1,134,312,293 
Minnesota (Federal Maint.' 
Funds) Approp. 88,146,700 79,249,243 86,092,674 91,103,358 1,395,458,957 
Cost 86,711,806 79,636,104 90,511,256 93,362,913 1,380,276,887 
Rehab. 
Approp. 4,981,000 7,604,000 19,140,256 5,803,889 175,736,202 
Cost 5,453,847 7,791,302 18,392,607 4,863,768 173,688,046 
(Contributed Funds) New Work:' 
Approp. 0 2,665,000 9,861,000 6,517,000 12,463,140 
Cost 0 1,847,795 9,705,891 9,457,785 12,603,856 
1. Includes $118,905,974 for new work on previous projects. 
2. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $927,294,200. 
3. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $924,399,582. 
4. Includes $18,250,531 for maintenance on previous project. 
5. Funding from Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 
TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT 
TABLE 25-B TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Regular Public Work Emergency 
District Cost Funds Funds Relief Funds Total 
St. Paul New Work' $ 60,184,2472 24,210,071 $9,071,214 $93,465,532 
Maintenance3 616,246,760 - - 616,246,760 
Rehabilitation 73,901,378 - - 73,901,378 
Total 750,332,385 24,210,071 9,071,214 783,613,670 
Rock Island New Work' 71,307,945' 17,403,322 11,338,865 100,050,132 
Maintenance6 539,639,786 - - 539,639,786 
Rehabilitation 111,064,053 - - 111,064,053 
Total 722,011,784 17,403,322 11,338,865 750,753,971 
St. Louis New Works 943,504,424' 10,282,566 2,440,266 956,227,256 
Maintenance 260,623,170 - - 260,623,170 
Rehabilitation 2,452,595 - - 2,452,595 
Total 1,206,580,189 688,931,922 161,057,556 1,219,303,021 
1. Excludes $2,041,140 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 
expended in pool No. 11. 
2. Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island District 
covering pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 
3. Includes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on 
operating and care of works of improvement under provisions 
of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 
Excludes $797,670 contributed funds. 
4. Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. 
5. $687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal year 
1958. 
Excludes $201,167 transferred to St. Paul and St. Louis Districts covering 
their pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 
6. Costs subsequent to FY 1953 included with operating and care. Includes 
the sum of $395,442, expended between 1930 and 1934 on the 
operating and care of the works of improvement under the provisions 
of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 
7. Includes $47,800 transferred from Rock Island District covering 
pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and $687,709 transferred from 
Rock Island District. 
8. Includes $897,758,208 for Melvin Price Locks and Dam. 
25-4

TABLE 25-C LOCKS AND DAMS 
Lock Dimensions 
Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent 
Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete 
Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of 
Above Chainm- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and 
Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including 
Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool 
St. Anthony 853.9 In city of 56 400 49.2 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some lime- Limestone. 100 - S 18.203,00( 
Falls. upper 
Lock 
St. Anthony 
Falls, lower 
Lock and dam 
Lock and dam 
1 
Lock and dam 
2 
Lock and dam 
3 
Lock and dam 
4 
Lock and dam 
5 
Lock and dam 
t 5A 
Lock and dam 
6 
Lock and dam 
7 
Lock and dam 
8 
Lock and dam 
9 
Lock and dam 
10 
Lock and dam 
11 
Lock and dam 
12 
Lock and dam 
13 
Lock and dam 
14 
Le Claire Lock 
(Canal 
Lock and dam 
15 
Lock and dam 
16 
Minneapolis, 
MN 
853.3 In city of 
Minneapolis, 
MN 
847.6 Minneapolis- 
St. Paul, MN 
815.2 1.3 above 
Hastings, MN 
796.9 6.1 above Red 
Wing, MN 
752.8 Alma, WI 
738.1 Minneiska, MN 
728.5 3 above 
Winona, MN 
714.3 Trempealeau, 
WI 
702.5 Dresbach, MN 
679.2 Genoa. WI 
647.9 3.3 below 
Lynxville, WI 
615.1 Guttenberg, IA 
583.0 3.7 above 
Dubuque, IA 
556.7 Bellevue. IA 
522.5 4.3 above 
Clinton. IA 
493.3 3.7 below 
Le Claire. IA 
493.1 3.9 below 
Le Claire. IA 
482.9 Foot of Arsenal 
Island, Rock 
Island, IL 
457.2 1.8 above 
Muscatine, IA 
stone, mainly 
sandstone. 
No piles. 
56 400 26.9 750.0 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No Sandstone. 
piles. 
56 400 35.94 725.1 13.5� 10.1 Rock and piles Piles in gravel. 
56 400 35.9 - 12.5' 7.6 in gravel. 
L10 500 12.2 - 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, Piles in sand, 
1108 600' 12.2 687.2 22.2 13.0 silt and clay. silt and clay. 
110 600 8.0 675.0 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. 
silt and clay. 
110 600 7.0 667.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 
and gravel, and gravel. 
110 600 9.0 660.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 
and gravel. 
L10 600 5.5 651.0 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 
110 60') 6.5 645.5 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand 
gravel and and clay. 
silt. 
110 600 K.0 639.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 
and gravel. 
110 600 11.0 631.0 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand 
gravel and and gravel. 
broken rock. 
110 600 9.0 620.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 
110 600 8.0 611.0 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 
110 600 11.0 603.0 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. 
gravel and 
silt. 
110 600 9.0 592.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 
and gravel, and gravel. 
110 600 11.0 583.0 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand 
clay and and gravel. 
gravel. 
110 600 11.0 527.0 20.5 13.5 Rock. Rock. 
80 320 11.0 - 17.6 10.9 Rock. Rock. 
110 600 16.0 561.0 24.0" 11.0 Rock. Rock. 
110 360 16.0 - 17.0"1 11.0 
110 600 9.0 545.0 17.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 
and gravel, and gravel. 
100 1959 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
99 
99 
100 
92 
100 
100 
1917 
1930 
1948 
1938 
1935 
1935 
1936 
1936 
1937 
1937 
1938 
1936 
1937 
1938 
1938 
1939 
1922 
1934 
] 
1
1
l
7 
12.382.000s 
2,358,000' 
6,492.000' 
5.596,000 
4.865,000 
5.081,000 
4.549,000 Z 
4,874,000 
C, 
5.574,000 
6.061.000 Z 
6,539,000. 
4,750,000 
7,428,000 0 
5,580,000 
7,502,000 27,502,000 
6,284,000 
10 
14,201,000 
98 1937 9,788,000

TABLE 25-C (Cont'd) LOCKS AND DAMS 
Lock Dimensions 
Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent 
Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete 
Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost 
Above Chain- for Full Pool Ohio Dams, and Opened Each Lock an Miles from her Width Lift Eleva. Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Includin 
Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool 
Lock and dam 437.1 4.2 above New 110 600 8.0 536.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 99 1939 $ 5,843,0( 
17 Boston, IL and gravel. 
Lock and dam 410.5 6.5 above 110 600 9.8 528.0 16.5 13.7 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 90 1937 10,308,00 
18 Burlington, 
IA 
Lock and dam 364.2 Keokuk, IA 110 358 38.2 518.2 4.5 9.2 Rock. Rock. 100 1913 
19 110 1,200 5.0 13.0 99 1957 14,813,0 
Lock and dam 343.2 0.9 above 110 600 10.0 480.0 15.0 12.0 Rock. Rock and 97 1936 6,281,0 
20 Canton, MO piles in 
sand and 
gravel. 
Lock and dam 324.9 2.1 below 110 600 10.5 470.0 16.5 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 95 1938 8,065,0 
21 Quincy, IL and gravel. and gravel. 
Lock and dam 301.2 1.5 below 110 600 10.2 459.5 18.0 13.8 Rock. Rock. 99 1938 5,275,0 
22 Saverton, MO 
Lock and dam 273.4 Clarksville, MO 110 600 15.0 449.0 19.0 12.0 Rock and piles. Piles in sand. 9914 1940 10,337,0 
24 
Lock and dam 241.4 Cap Au Gris, 110 600 15.0 434.0 19.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 99" 1939 13,694,0 
25 MO and gravel. and gravel. 
Lock and dam 202.9 Alton, IL 110 600 24.0 419.0 19.0 10.0 Piles in sand. Piles and 100 1938 12,824,0 
26 (Henry T. 110 360 24.0 - 16.0 10.0 sand. 
Rainey Dam)" 
Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 1,200 24.0 419.0 23.0 18.0 Piles to Piles to 96 1990 743,600,0 
Locks and Dam bedrock. bedrock. 
Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 600 24.0 419.0 42.0 18.0 Piles to Piles to 93 - 226,000,0 
Locks and Dam bedrock. bedrock. 
(2nd Lock) 
Total, Locks 
and dams $ 1,195,147,0 
LI1 
of 
d
g
0
DO 
00 2 
00 
00 
DO 
D0 
00 
D0 
00 
00 
D0 
1. Elevation of pools I to 22 and at St. Anthony Falls are mean sea 
level 1912 adjustment: pools 24, 26 are mean sea level 1929 
adjustment. 
2. Includes existing dam, owned by Northern States Power Co. 
3. Includes dredging above upper lock. (Federal cost only.) 
4. Based on pool elevation 723.1 in pool 1 which is crest of dam. 
Pool is normally maintained at elevation 725.1 by flashboards. 
5. Includes lower approach dredging and dredging between upper and 
lower rock. (Federal cost only.) 
6. In addition $1,948,000 expended from previous projects and 
$1,349,600 from O & M appropriation for first of twin locks. Excludes 
lock and dam rehabilitation program. 
7. Old upper guard sill. 
8. Landward lock. 
9. In addition, $1,965,300 expended from previous projects. 
10. Existing Le Claire Canal lock is used as auxiliary to lock 14; 
previous project cost $540,000. 
11. Depth over upper poiree sill. Depth over upper miter sill is 27 feet, 
at lock 15. 
12. $640,868 for first lock was reported by Mississippi River Power 
Company, transferred to Government free in lieu of improvements 
destroyed. (Annual Report, 1928, pp. 1118-1119.) Present estimate 
includes $13,132,600 for main lock and appurtenant work. 
13. Includes cash contribution of $4,900,000. 
14. Complete except for guidewall extensions. 
15. Lock and Dam 26 has been replaced by the Melvin Price Locks 
and Dam at which full pool was raised 1 February 1990. Lock and 
Dam 26 has been removed. 
0
0
0
0
0
PC 
x
0
an 
y
t

TABLE 2F-D HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS
Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or 
Name Miles above Location Type depth Percent Estimated 
eOhRioi ver (feet) Width Length Complete Cost 
St. Paul Harbor, MN 
Hastings Harbor, MN 
Red Wing Harbor, MN 
Red Wing Harbor, MN 
Bay City Harbor, WI 
Lake City Harbor, MN 
Pepin Harbor, WI 
Wabasha Harbor, MN 
Alma Harbor, WI 
Winona Harbors, MN 
Lansing Harbor, IA 
Prairie du Chien 
Harbor, WI 
Dubuque Harbor, IA 
Savanna Harbor, IL 
Clinton Harbor, IA 
Moline Harbor, IL 
Davenport Harbor, IA 
(Lindsay Park) 
Rock Island Harbor, IL 
Andalusia Harbor, IL 
Muscatine Harbor, IA 
Fort Madison Harbor, 
IA 
836.5-839.2 In city of St. Paul, MN 
839.7 Channel improvement, 
Small-boat harbor and 
channel enlargement. 
813.2 Lower end of city of 
Hastings, MN 
791.4 In city of Red Wing, MN 
791.1 In city of Red Wing, MN 
785.9 Upper end of Bay City, 
WI 
773.0 In city of Lake City, MN 
767.1 
760.0 
751.3 
726.0 
726.2 
663.3 
635.5 
635.0 
579.4 
537.3 
519.0 
488.0 
484.2 
479.8 
473.0 
455.5 
455.6 
In city of Pepin, WI 
Upper end of city of 
Wabasha, MN 
Upper end of Alma, WI 
In city of Winona, MN 
Latsch Island 
Crooked Slough 
Upper end of city of 
Lansing, IA 
Upper end of city of 
Prairie du Chien, WI 
In Marais de St. Friol 
East Channel below 
Hwy bridges. 
At Dubuque, IA 
At Savanna, IL 
At Clinton, IA 
At Moline, IL 
At Lindsay Park 
At Rock Island, IL 
Andalusia Slough 
At Muscatine, IA 
383.7 At Fort Madison, IA 
Commercial 
Small-boat 
Small-boat 
Commercial 
Small-boat 
Small-boat 
Small-boat 
Commercial' 
Small-boat' 
Small-boat 
Small-boat 
Small-boat 
Small-boat 
Commercial 
Small-boat 
Small-boat 
Commercial 
Commercial 
Small-boat 
Small-boat 
Small-boat 
Small-boat 
Entrance channel 
small-boat harbor 
Small-boat 
Small-boat 
Freight terminal 
approach channel 
Small-boat 
9 400-1,000 
5 300 
200 
300 
450 
50-100 
400 
500 
500 
50 
175-400 
300 
200 
200 
170 
400 
12
5555 
340 
280 
400 
230 
200 
100 
40 
150 
200 
250 
1,100 100 
435 100 
950 100 
1,890 100 
900 100 184,200 
2.7(mile) 
400 
100 
100 
500 100 
1,200 
800 
5,990 
600 
1,000 
850 
600 
800 
500 
1,000 
6,000 
500 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
$ 217,100 
230,200 
74,300 
146,800' 
8,700 
39,4002 
93,500 
1,077,000' 
205,500' 
41,700 
56,300 
89,800 
84,700 
95,300 
85,500 
93,100 
55,200 
310,000 
101,912 
110,328 
262,100 
31,000 
21,000 
353,000 
800 100 
1,000 
frontage 
M1 
w
2
(I' 
2
.m
C0 
z
ci 
0
z
d
z
z. 
100 
100
0 
78 
100 
1,500 
910 
1,400 
660 
1,150

Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or 
Name Miles above Location Type Depth Percent Estimated 
Ohio River (feet) Width Length Complete Cost 
Warsaw Harbor, IL 359.1 At Warsaw, IL Small-boat 5 100 600 100 $ 73,000 
Quincy Harbor, IL 327.3 In Quincy Bay, IL Small-boat 5 200-300 9,000 0 
Hannibal Harbor, MO 308.8 At Hannibal, MO Small-boat 5 180-260 600 100 129,000 
Total $4,269,640 
1. In addition, local interests contributed $3,455. 
2. In addition, local interests contributed $9,533. 
3. Commercial harbor converted to small-boat harbor under authority 
of Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Primary 
use is small-boat, although some commercial activity exists. 
4. In addition, local interests contributed $812,599. 
5. In addition, local interests contributed $32,344. 
6. Maintenance only, estimated at $5,000 annually. 
0
0
CI) 
0
0
0
C
70 
-]) 
-n 
Cl) 
-O 
70 
< 
TABLE 25-D (Cont'd) HARBOR IMPR~OVEMENTS

TABLE 25-E 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN 
ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO 
COST OF PROJECT 
Facilities for public use, convenience and safety 
Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater 
Regulating works between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River 
Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, lowa, for navigation 
Miscellaneous 
Total additional features 
Total existing project (new work) 
1. Includes a lump-sum payment of $2,146,800 (O&M appropriation) paid 
to the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, for rectification of seepage 
damages. Also includes $140,000 Construction General funds for project 
studies, evaluation, and report preparation. 
2. Includes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch Bridge, Minneapolis, MN. 
(F Y 1969) 
3. Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy 
Slough, MO. 
TABLE 25-F 
LICENSE FEES COLLECTED 
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1995
Annual Collections to 
Dam Licensee Charge Sept. 30, 1995 
St. Anthony Falls Lower Nothern States Power $ 3,300 $ 109,777 
Lock and Dam Co. (No. 2056) 
Lock and Dam No. 1 Ford Motor Co. 95,400 6,680,040 
Lock and Dam No. 2 City of Hastings, MN. 24,163 180,862 
TOTAL $ 6,970,679 
25-9 
$ 18,842,200 
8,900,400' 
545,000 
193,600 
9,404,9002 
18,705,900' 
$ 516,183,512

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
FTABLE 25-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Acts Work Authorized I)ocuments 
Sep. 22, 1922 
.July 3, 1930 as 
amended by P.R. 
No. 10, Feb. 24, 
1932 
June 26, 1934 
Aug. 30. 1935 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 26, 1937 
)ec. 22, 19141 
Mar. 2, 1915 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
None 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
July 2.1, 1916 
July 24, 1946 
July 24, 1946 
July 24, 1946 
July 24, 19146 
June 30, 1948 
May 17, 1950 
May 17, 1950 
May 17, 1950 
May 17, 1950 
May 17, 1950 
May 17, 1950 
May 17, 1950) 
May 17, 1950 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Sep. 3, 1954 
July 3, 1958 
July 3, 1958 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER ANDI) 
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 
Dredging channels to landing places. 
Project adopted from Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of 
Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such 
modification in plan as may be deemed advisable.' 
Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams 
to be provided for with funds from Department of the Army 
appropriations for rivers and harbors. 
Missouri River established as lower limit of project. 
Extension of 9-foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, MN, 
including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, MN 
St. Paul, MN harbor. 
DI)etermine damages to drainage and levee districts caused l)y 
seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof. 
Public park and recreational facilities. 
Red Wing, MN harbor. 
Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and 
backwater at Cochrane, WI 
Such changes or additions to payments, remedial works, or land 
acquisitions authorized by River and Harbor Act of Aug. 26, 
1937 (River and Harbor Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st 
sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. 
St. Paul, MN channel enlargements, small boat harbor, and 
roadwIy. 
Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above 
estimated stage for discharge of 40,000 c.f.s. 
Winona, MN basin. 
Future modification of lock and dam No. 2 ir power 
development. 
Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of 
alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. 
Anthony Falls project. 
Lake City, MN harbor. 
Wabasha, MN harbor. 
Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, pools 3 
to 11. 
Hastings, MN harbor. 
Lansing, IA harbor. 
Fort Madison, IA harbor. 
Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, IA. 
Davenport, IA harbor. 
Muscatine, IA harbor. 
Alma, WI harbor. 
Hannibal, MO harbor. 
Prairie du Chien, WI harbors. 
Opposite Ilamburg, IL, harbor.' 
Permits such change in location of Winona, MN small boat basin 
authorized by River and Harbor Act of Mar. 2, 1945 (II. Doc. 
263, 77th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. 
Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, MN, in lieu 
of previously authorized commercial harbor. 
Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, MO. 
Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes 
completion of St. Anthony Falls project. 
Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, IL.2 
None 
H. Doe. 290, 71st Cong., 2(d sess. 
None 
II. Doc. 137. 72nd Cong.. 1st sess. 
IH.D oc. 137, 72nd Cong. 1st 
sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Do. 44, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 
Rivers and II arbors Committ(ee 
Doe. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 
None 
II. I)oc. 103, 7tIh o( g., Ist 
ses.. 
11. Doc. 137, 76th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
None 
II.D oc. 547, 76th Cong., 3rd 
sess. 
S. D)oc. 54, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 
11. Doc. 263, 77th Cong.. 1st 
sess. 
II. Doc. 432, 771 It(hng .. Ist 
sess. 
II. Doe. 449, 78th Cong., 2(1 sess. 
If. Doc. 511, 79th Cong., 2d( sess. 
H. Doe. 514, 79th Cong.. 2(1 sess. 
H. Doe. 515, 79th Cong., 2(1 sess. 
H. Doe. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 
S. Doe. 192, 79th Cong., 2(d s ess. 
II. Doe. 661, 80th Cong. 2(1 sess. 
S. Doe. 197, 80th Cong., 2(1 sess. 
H. Doe. 642, 80th Cong., 2(1 sess. 
H. Doe. 733, 80th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doe. 66, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 67, 81st Cong., I1st sess. 
II. Doc. 71, 81st Cong., 1st. sess. 
11.D )oc. 254, 81st Cong., Istss.s . 
None 
H. Doe. 347, 83rd Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H. Doc. 251, 82nd Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H. Doe. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 
H. Doe. 136, 84th Cong., 1st sess. 
25-10

MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN 
TABUR E ! I25~G A IITTAJIbDI7TNIE I ICIQ ATIhN 
1. Deauthorized FY 75. 
2. Inactive. 
3. Deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 
4. Guidewalls at Locks 3, 4, 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9, and 10 deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 
5. Deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 
6. Guidewall extensions at Locks 16, 18, and 21; construction of mooring facilities at Locks and Dams 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18; 
upper approach improvement at Lock 19 and Lock and Dam 20; and rock and/or conglomerate excavation in Pools 14, 18, and 21 
deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 
� �)La45kJ IJ (r-'U.& UI UJ ~J�AZAV ZIL ~ l\Vi�Li.I JZiC� ��1F 
Acts Work Authorized Documents 
July 3, 1958 Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., 1st sess. 
districts caused by operation of navigation pools. 
July 3, 1958 Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. 
Mar. 3, 1959 Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide None 
adequate facilities for existing navigation. 
July 14, 1960 Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing, MN. H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 
Oct. 23, 1962 Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna 2, Moline, H. Doc. 513, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 
Andalusia, New Boston5, Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, IL; 
Bellevue', Clinton, Davenport, and Keokuk3, IA; St. Paul 
(Harriet Island), MNS; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville5, WI. 
Oct. 23, 1962 Payment of damages caused by pool 24 at Clarksville, MO. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 
Oct. 23, 1962 Remedial works at Sandy Slough, MO. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 
Nov. 7, 1966 Repair of Stone Arch Bridge at Minneapolis, MN. None 
Oct. 21, 1978 Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 Public Law 95-502 
Dec. 29, 1981 Change name of Lock and Dam 26 to Melvin Price Locks and Dam Public Law 97-118 
effective on the date of Melvin Price's death. 
(Apr. 22, 1988 - date of death)

OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT *
This district comprises portions of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, 
Colorado, Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri, all embraced in the drainage basin of the Missouri River along the 
main stem and tributaries to Rulo, NE. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation 
1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA 
to Rulo, NE 
2. Navigation Work Under Special 
Authorization 
Page 
26-3 
26-3 
Flood Control 
3. Bear Creek Lake, CO 
4. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 
5. Chatfield Lake, CO 
6. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 
7. Fall River Basin, SD 
8. Lost Creek at Columbus, NE 
9. Missouri National Recreational 
River, NE and SD 
10. Missouri River Between Ft. Peck 
Dam, MT and Gavins Point Dam, 
SD & NE 
11. Missouri River Fish & Wildlife 
Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, & ND 
12. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, 
NE to Sioux City, IA 
13. Papillion Creek and Tributaries 
Lakes, NE 
14. Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE 
15. Perry Creek, IA 
16. Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin 
Program (Omaha District) 
17. Pipestem Lake, ND 
18. Salt Creek & Tributaries, NE 
19. South Platte River Basin, CO 
20. Thurman to Hamburg, IA 
21. Westerly Creek, CO 
22. Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Works 
23. Scheduling Flood Control 
Reservoir Operations 
26-3 
26-3 
26-4 
26-4 
26-4 
26-5 
26-5 
26-5 
26-6 
26-6 
26-6 
26-7 
26-7 
26-7 
26-8 
26-8 
26-8 
26-8 
26-8 
26-9 
26-9 
24. Flood Control Activities Under 
Special Authorization 
Project Modifications for Improvement 
of Environment 
25. Project Modifications for 
Improvement of Environment 
Under Special Authorization 
26. Boyer Chute, NE 
27. California Bend, NE 
28. Deroin Bend, MO 
29. Hidden Lake/Great Marsh, NE 
Multiple Purpose Projects 
Including Power 
30. Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, 
Missouri River Basin, SD 
31. Fort Peck Lake, MT 
32. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis 
Case, Missouri River Basin, SD 
33. Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, 
Missouri River Basin, ND 
34. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and 
Clark Lake, Missouri River 
Basin, NE and SD 
35. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri 
River Basin, SD and ND 
36. Missouri River Master Water 
Control Manual Review and 
Update 
Miscellaneous 
37. National Emergency Preparedness 
(NEPP) 
26-1 
Page 
26-9 
26-10 
26-10 
26-10 
26-11 
26-11 
26-11 
26-11 
26-12 
26-12 
26-13 
26-13 
26-13 
26-14

Page 
38. Flood Control and Costal 
Emergency (FC&CE) 26-14 
39. General Regulatory Functions 26-14 
40. General Investigations 
(See Table 26-K) 26-14 
Tables 
26-A Cost and Financial Statement 26-15 
26-B Authorizing Legislation 26-21 
26-C Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects 26-26 
26-D Not Applicable 26- 
26-E Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects 26-27 
26-F Other Multiple Purpose Projects 
Including Power 26-29 
26-G Deauthorized Projects 26-30 
26-H Missouri River Levee System, 
Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 26-31 
26-I Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin 
Program 26-32 
26-J Inspection of Completed Local 
Protection Projects 26-33 
26-K Active General Investigations 26-37 
26-L Flood Control Activities 
Under Special Authorization 26-39 
26-M Project Modifications for 
Improvement of Environment 26-40 
26-2

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
NAVIGATION 
1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA 
TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA 
TO RULO, NE) 
Location. Channel of the Missouri River extending 
from Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE. 
Previous projects. For details see page 1893, 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1175, Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. A navigation channel of 9-foot 
depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by 
revetment of banks, rock dikes to contract and 
stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, 
closing minor channels, and removal of snags and 
dredging as required. Construction was initiated on 
this section of the project (Sioux City to Rulo) in FY 
1928, the bank stabilization work was completed in 
April 1979, and the navigation feature was completed 
in September 1980. A reliable channel suitable for 
navigation is available through this section. Controlling 
depth at ordinary stages of the river is 9 feet, 
with additional depths available during high stages. 
Commercial navigation was inaugurated on this section 
in May 1939, and common carrier transportation 
service was inaugurated in October 1946. Seven riverside 
recreation sites are complete and in operation. 
(See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described 
in full on page 26-2 of FY 1988 Annual Report. 
Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities for loading 
and unloading grain, liquids and dry bulk products are 
maintained by private interests at various locations on 
this section of the river. A complete list of terminal 
facilities is included in the Missouri River navigation 
maps and can be obtained from the Omaha District 
for a small fee. 
Operations during FY. Two structural maintenance 
contracts were completed on the dikes and 
revetments damaged by the 1993 flood from the 
mouth of the Platte River to Rulo, NE. A total of 
121,000 tons of rock was placed by the contractor 
and government forces. District personnel accomplished 
other work items: channel reconnaissance, 
surveys and mapping, engineering and design, surveys and 
layouts of construction, and supervision and administration. 
Local interests operate and maintain the recreation 
sites. 
2. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized 
by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). 
No work during the period. 
FLOOD CONTROL 
3. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO 
Location. A dam site is on Bear Creek in Jefferson 
County, CO, about 8 miles above the confluence of Bear 
Creek with the South Platte River at Denver. 
Existing project. Earthfill dam 180 feet high, with a 
crest length of about 5,300 feet; and a supplementary 
earthfill dike with a height of 65 feet and a crest length 
of 2,100 feet, to the south of the main dam, and an 
uncontrolled earth and rock-cut emergency spillway. The 
lake provides storage capacity of 28,831 acre-feet for 
flood control and 1,979 acre-feet for sediment and 
recreation. Construction of the project was initiated in 
October 1973 and was completed in September 1982, 
exclusive of recreation facilities. (See Table 26-A for 
total cost of construction.) 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described in 
full on page 21-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. 
Operations during FY. Maintenance: Continued 
routine operation and maintenance activities. 
4. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND 
Location. A dam site is on North Fork of Grand 
River in southwestern North Dakota, about 6 miles 
above Haley, ND. 
26-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
Existing project. An earth-fill dam 79 feet high, 
with a crest length of 5,730 feet, and a reservoir with 
a flood storage capacity of about 72,700 acre-feet, 
plus 19,780 acre-feet for sediment storage, fish and 
wildlife conservation, recreation, and future water 
supply for communities of Bowman, Reeder, 
Scranton, and Gascoyne, ND. Construction was 
initiated in July 1964, and the project was completed 
in 1970. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described 
in full on page 26-2 of FY 1988 Annual Report. 
Operations during FY. Maintenance: Continued 
routine operation and maintenance activities. 
5. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO 
Location. A dam site on the South Platte River, 
just below the mouth of Plum Creek, about eight 
miles upstream from Denver, CO. 
Existing project. Consists of rolled earth-fill 
dam with a maximum height of 148 feet and a crest 
length of 12,500 feet; a reservoir with flood control 
capacity of 204,737 acre-feet and sediment capacity of 
26,692 acre-feet, which will be used for recreation; 
and an enlarged channel from the dam downstream 
to Denver to accommodate reservoir flood releases. 
The Corps participated with local interests in acquisition 
of lands and development of recreation facilities 
immediately downstream of the Chatfield Dam 
in lieu of a portion of the channel improvement. 
Construction of the project was initiated in August 
1967 and was physically completed in 1992. (See 
Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described 
in full on page 26-3 of FY 1993 Annual Report. 
Operations during FY. Maintenance: Continued 
routine operation and maintenance activities. 
6. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO 
Location. A dam site on Cherry Creek in 
Arapahoe County, CO, approximately 6 miles southeast 
of Denver, CO, just outside of city limits. Cherry Creek 
joins South Platte River within city limits of Denver, 
Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum 
height of 141 feet above streambed and a crest 
length of 14,300 feet. Project includes a reinforced 
concrete outlet works and an uncontrolled side channel 
spillway canal discharging into adjacent Toll Gate Creek. 
Cherry Creek project provides reservoir storage capacity 
of 93,920 acre-feet below spillway canal invert and, in 
addition, a surcharge storage of 134,470 acre-feet. Plan 
of operation in ultimate development for multiplepurpose 
uses includes 13,960 acre-feet for sediment 
storage and 79,960 acre-feet for conservation purposes. 
Construction began in FY 1946 and was completed in 
June 1961, exclusive of recreation facilities. (See Table 
26-A for total cost of construction.) 
Local cooperation. None required except for recreation 
cost-sharing. 
Operations during FY. Maintenance: Continued 
routine operation and maintenance activities. 
7. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD 
Location. In Custer and Fall River Counties, in and 
near the town of Hot Springs, SD. Hot Springs unit is in 
the town of Hot Springs, immediately south of the 
junction of Cold Brook and Hot Brook which combine to 
form the Fall River. Cold Brook Lake unit is approximately 
1.25 miles north of the town of Hot Springs on 
Cold Brook, and Cottonwood Springs Lake unit is 
approximately 4.5 miles west of the town of Hot Springs 
on Cottonwood Springs Creek, one-half mile upstream 
from its confluence with Hot Brook. 
Existing project. The general plan of improvement 
provides flood protection for Hot Springs, SD. The Hot 
Springs channel improvement unit consisted of widening, 
deepening and straightening 6,000 feet of channel of Fall 
River. The Cold Brook Lake unit, an earth-fill dam with 
appurtenant structures, controls an area of 70.5 square 
miles. The Cottonwood Springs Lake unit consists of an 
earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures and controls an 
area of 26 square miles. Construction of Hot Springs 
unit was completed during FY 1951. Construction of 
Cold Brook unit dam and appurtenances was completed 
26-4

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
in FY 1953 with the exception of a road and parking 
area, which were completed in FY 1955. Construction 
of the Cottonwood Springs Dam was completed 
in FY 1970, with the exception of the recreation 
facilities, which were completed in FY 1972. (See 
Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) 
Local cooperation. Local cooperation requirements 
have been fully complied with. 
Operations during FY. Maintenance: Routine 
operation and maintenance activities were continued 
on the Cottonwood Springs and Cold Brook Dams 
and structures. 
8. LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE 
Location. On Lost Creek just north of the city of 
Columbus in Platte County, NE. 
Existing project. This project provides levee and 
channel improvements on the north side of Columbus 
and provides protection to commercial and residential 
areas. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) 
Local cooperation. A contract with the city of 
Columbus to sponsor the project was approved on 
February 18, 1982. 
Operations during FY. A contractor's claim was 
denied in July 1990 by the contracting officer. Subsequently, 
the contractor appealed this decision to the 
U.S. Claims Court. On July 29, 1994, a meeting was 
held with the contractor in which a settlement in the 
amount of $1,283,665 plus interest was agreed upon. 
Payment, including interest, was made December 27, 
1994 in the amount of $1,835,832.18. 
9. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL 
RIVER, NE AND SD 
Location. On the Missouri River between Gavins 
Point Dam and Ponca State Park, NE. This includes 
Cedar and Dixon Counties in Nebraska, and 
Yankton, Clay, and Union Counties in South Dakota. 
Existing project. The designation as a National 
Recreational River will preserve outstanding and important 
scenic values and will provide additional opportunities 
for river access and recreation use. The project 
provides erosion control, consisting of bank stabilization 
and river management techniques designed to preserve 
the existing environment, and at the same time preserves 
high bank flood plain lands. Estimated total cost of 
construction is $21,640,000 (1995) of which $21,000,000 
is the Federal cost of construction and $640,000 is the 
non-Federal contributed funds - other costs. 
Local cooperation. All recreational construction on 
this project will be done in accordance with the costsharing 
and financing concepts reflected in the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986. A cost-sharing 
contract with the state of South Dakota for the Myron 
Grove access site was signed on June 24, 1986; and the 
Yankton-Riverside Park Section 215 Agreement was 
signed on April 24, 1989. Construction was completed in 
June 1987 and June 1991, respectively. 
Operations during FY. Efforts to protect Federally 
listed threatened and endangered species and the drafting 
of a new General Management Plan (GMP) for this area 
continued. The GMP, and an accompanying EIS, is 
scheduled for public release in a draft form in late spring 
1996. The Corps and the National Park Service (NPS) 
are co-leads for the EIS; the NPS is writing the GMP 
with assistance from the Corps and other agencies on the 
Planning Team. 
10. MISSOURI RIVER, BETWEEN FlT. PECK DAM, 
MT AND GAVINS POINT DAM, SD, NE 
Location. The project is located along the Missouri 
River between Fort Peck Dam, MT, and a point 58 miles 
downstream of Gavins Point Dam, SD and NE. 
Existing project. Consists of undertaking measures, 
including maintenance and rehabilitation of existing 
structures, to alleviate bank erosion and related problems 
associated with releases from the six Missouri River main 
stem dams that the Secretary determines will be needed. 
In lieu of structural measures, lands may be acquired in 
affected areas from willing sellers. The costs of the measures 
shall be apportioned among project purposes as a 
joint-use operation and maintenance expense. Estimated 
Federal cost of the project is between $70 and $110 
million for construction or $10 million for the land 
26-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
requisition alternative. Cost is limited to no more 
than $3 million per FY. 
Local cooperation. Non-federal funds are not 
required for this project. One reach, the Missouri 
National Recreational River downstream from Gavins 
Point Dam, requires, under its separate authorization, 
that the landowners make available appropriate land 
interests to maintain the recreational and scenic 
qualities of the river and adjacent lands. In the other 
river reaches, lands can be acquired on a willingseller 
basis if land acquisition is the recommended 
measure for erosion control at a given river site. 
Operations during FY. Completed the Real 
Estate Design Memorandum and the required maintenance 
at the Garrison Dam site and below Fort 
Randall Dam site. Completed Initial Design Reports 
for two non-traditional erosion control sites. Plans 
and Specs were started for both non-traditional 
erosion control sites and coordination continued with 
landowners and other interested parties. 
11. MISSOURI RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE 
MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, & MO 
Location. The project extends along the Missouri 
River from Sioux City, IA, to the mouth near St. 
Louis, Mo. 
Existing project. To mitigate a portion of the 
fish and wildlife habitat losses resulting from the 
construction and operation of the Missouri River 
Bank Stabilization and Navigation project. 
Local cooperation. This project has no costsharing 
sponsor. The entire project is being borne by 
the Federal government with no cost to either local 
governments or the affected states. Therefore, is no 
Project Cooperation Agreement is required. Although 
the four affected states are not participating 
financially in the project, the states are very actively 
involved in the planning and design of the project. 
The states also are participating in the project by 
furnishing perpetual easements for construction and 
operation on existing state-owned lands. The states 
of Missouri and Iowa are the primary donors of such 
easements. 
Operations during FY. Efforts continued on acquiring 
land rights on 29,900 acres of land and agreements 
with the states for development on 18,200 acres of stateowned 
land. 
12. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO 
SIOUX CITY, IA 
Location. Project is along Missouri River between 
Ponca Bend, NE, and combination bridge at Sioux City, 
IA. 
Existing project. Construction of dikes, revetments 
and channel improvement along Missouri River from 
Miners Bend and vicinity, SD and NE, to Sioux City, IA. 
Project was started in June 1946 and completed in June 
1961. (See Table 26-A for total costs.) 
Operations during FY. Routine operation and 
maintenance activities continued. 
13. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, 
NE 
Location. The Papillion Creek basin is located in 
Washington, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties, NE. Big 
Papillion Creek rises west of Blair and flows southeasterly 
through metropolitan Omaha. It is joined by the 
Little Papillion Creek just above Offutt AFB, forming 
Papillion Creek. The combined creeks flow along the 
side of Offutt AFB to its confluence with the Missouri 
River. 
Existing project. The active project consists of a 
series of four dams and reservoirs, channel improvements, 
an effluent storage facility, and a flood warning 
system on tributaries of Papillion Creek. Construction 
was initiated in FY 1972. Completed projects include 
Standing Bear Lake, Glenn Cunningham Lake, and 
Wehrspann Lake. Estimated total costs for the project 
is $68,659,000 consisting of $64,334,000 in Federal funds 
($1,367,000 to be reimbursed by the non-Federal sponsor) 
and $2,958,000 non-Federal other costs and cash 
contributions. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described in 
full on page 21-6 of FY 1981 Annual Report. 
26-6

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
Operations during FY. Construction was completed 
on recreation facilities at Ed Zorinsky Lake, 
and on the Big Papillion Creek Channel flood control 
project. Both projects have been transferred to the 
appropriate local sponsor for operations and maintenance. 
14. PEBBLE CREEK SCRIBNER, NE 
Location. Scribner, NE, is located in Dodge 
County about 47 miles northwest of Omaha. Pebble 
Creek is a right-bank tributary to the Elkhorn River. 
Existing project. The project includes a 3.6 milelong 
levee with an average height of about eight feet, 
plus three feet of freeboard, providing 100-year flood 
protection from Pebble Creek; a closure structure at 
U.S. Highway 275 at the northern edge of Scribner; 
four road ramps over the levee; an automated flood 
warning system; and appropriate land use zoning and 
continued flood insurance for unprotected areas. 
Construction on the Pebble Creek levee was completed 
in October 1989. In the process of providing 
Federal Emergency Management Association 
(FEMA) the necessary data to revise the flood insurance 
rate maps to reflect the Pebble Creek levee, it 
was determined that Scribner is subject to greater 
residual flooding from the Elkhorn River than was 
previously determined. Additional studies concluded 
that it would be feasible to construct the Elkhorn 
River levee, which is 2.1 miles long with an average 
height of 4 feet and provides 100-year level of 
protection with 3 feet of freeboard. 
Local cooperation. The city of Scribner strongly 
supported the entire project, including the Elkhorn 
River levee modification. The City obtained costsharing 
assistance from the Nebraska Natural Resources 
Commission and the Lower Elkhorn Natural 
Resources District. 
Operations during FY. Construction of the 
Elkhorn River levee modification was initiated in 
March 1994 and completed in December 1995. The 
total estimated cost of the project is $3,232,000. The 
non-Federal portion of this estimate is $807,000 
which includes $363,000 for lands, easements, and 
rights-of-ways. 
15. PERRY CREEK IA 
Location. The Perry Creek basin is located in 
Woodbury and Plymouth Counties in northwestern Iowa. 
The downstream five miles of the basin lie within the 
corporate limits of Sioux City, IA, and drain the central 
portion of the city. 
Existing project. The project consists of 14,800 
linear feet of grass and rock lined channel, 1,500 linear 
feet of new conduit, modification of 710 linear feet of 
existing conduit, and a concrete stilling basin, to provide 
capacity for the 100-year event. Also included are 4.25 
miles of hiking/biking trail and a basin-wide flood warning 
system. Estimated project cost is $65,700,000, of which 
$41,427,000 is Federal cost and $24,273,000 is non- 
Federal cost. 
Local cooperation. The project is authorized under 
the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The City 
of Sioux City, IA, is the local sponsor. 
Operations during FY. The Project Cooperation 
Agreement was signed in March 1995. The Phase I 
construction contract was awarded in September 1995. 
The Phase II Feature Design Memorandum was completed, 
and the Plans and Specifications were initiated. 
Rights-of-Way have been developed for Phase II, Phase 
III, and 50 percent of Phase IV. 
16. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM 
(OMAHA DISTRICT) 
Location. Flood control improvements in this project 
are along the Missouri River and several of its principal 
tributaries and in states comprising the Missouri River 
Basin. 
Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for 
flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River 
Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between 
Sioux City, IA, and mouth and reservoirs on the Missouri 
River main stem and tributaries. See individual reports 
and Table 26-I for projects in the Omaha District 
included in the program. 
26-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
17. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND 
Location. On Pipestem Creek in Stutsman 
County, ND, three miles upstream from where 
Pipestem Creek joins the James River at Jamestown, 
ND.
Existing project. The project consists of a rolled 
earthfill dam approximately 108 feet high with a crest 
length of 4,000 feet and outlet works of a gated reinforced 
concrete conduit. The reservoir provides 
146,880 acre-feet of storage. The multipurpose pool 
provides space for silt storage and 885 acres of water 
surface for fish, wildlife and recreation needs. 
Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1970 
and completed in FY 1977. (See Table 26-A for total 
construction costs.) 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described 
in full on page 26-6 of FY 1988 Annual Report. 
Operations during FY. Routine operation and 
maintenance activities continued. 
18. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE 
Location. Salt Creek Basin comprises an area of 
about 1,627 square miles in and around Lincoln in 
southeastern Nebraska. 
Existing project. The authorized project consists 
of a system of 10 dams and reservoirs, channel 
clearing, enlarging and realignment, levees and 
necessary bridge alternations. Pursuant to Senate 
Resolution adopted August 7, 1964, which authorized 
a review of the Salt Creek survey report, additional 
units were placed in "inactive" classification. Construction 
of the project began in the spring of 1962. 
All work under the active portion of the project, 
consisting of the 10 dams and reservoirs and the 
channel improvements and levees through Lincoln, 
was completed in 1969. Funds were transferred to 
the project in FY 1980 with concurrence of Congressional 
Committees. These funds were used to determine 
an effective method of correction for the 
dispersive clay problem in the completed downstream 
levees through Lincoln. (See Table 26-A for total 
construction costs.) 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described in 
full on page 26-6 of FY 1988 Annual Report. 
Operations during FY. Maintenance: Routine 
operation and maintenance activities continued. 
19. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO 
Location. Flood control improvements in this project 
are along the South Platte River and its tributaries in 
Colorado. 
Existing project. General plan for flood control and 
other purposes to provide for construction of Chatfield 
Lake on the South Platte River, Bear Creek Lake on 
Bear Creek, and levee and channel improvements on the 
South Platte River. (See individual reports and Table 
26-B for authorizing legislation). 
20. THURMAN TO HAMBURG, IA 
Location. The project area is approximately 110 
square miles. It extends from Thurman, IA, on the north 
to the mouth of the Nishnabotna River on the south and 
from the Missouri River on the west to the bluffs on the 
east.
Existing project. The flood problem is caused by 
flood waters backing up behind the existing levees when 
drainage structures are closed during high flows on these 
rivers. Two pump stations have been designed to 
alleviate this flooding in the southern half of the study 
area. Estimated cost through construction is $853,000 
Federal and $284,000 non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. Fremont County, IA and five 
drainage districts are the cost-sharing sponsors. 
Operations during FY. During FY 95 the PCA was 
signed and a supply contract for pumps was awarded. 
21. WESTERLY CREEK, CO 
Location. Westerly Creek Dam impounds the 
Westerly Creek on Lowry Air Force Base, CO. Lowry 
Air Force Base is just east of Denver, CO. 
26-8

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
Existing project. The project consists of two 
major Phases and a minor follow-on contract. Phase 
I involved construction of four new buildings and 
associated utilities. Phase II is the embankment and 
spillway contract, which included demolishing existing 
buildings, utility relocations, construction of an 
embankment and spillway, relocation of four golf 
course greens, relocation of one tee box, construction 
of channels adjacent to the golf course, and repair of 
the existing 48 inch conduit. A follow-on contract 
corrected some erosion to the collector channel 
system. 
Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor is 
the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District 
(UDFCD) of the Metropolitan Denver area. 
UDFCD requested credit for $6,353,000 in downstream 
channel improvements, which were constructed 
between January 1, 1978 and August 6, 1984. The 
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) on 
March 14, 1988 approved credit for the construction 
accomplished by the local sponsor in an amount 
equivalent to the cost of the relocations and collector 
channels. Appropriate adjustments have been made 
to the Federal and non-Federal costs. The Local 
Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 2, 
1988. 
Operations during FY. Project is financially 
complete. 
22. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD 
CONTROL WORKS 
Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent 
acts require local interests to furnish assurances 
that they will maintain and operate certain local 
protection projects after completion, in accordance 
with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. 
District Engineers are responsible for administration 
of these regulations within the boundaries of their 
respective districts. 
Inspections of completed local protection projects 
which have been turned over to local interests for 
maintenance and operation during the FY are set 
forth in Table 26-J, Inspections of Completed Local 
Protection Projects. FY costs were $364,757. 
23. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL 
RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 
Under Sections 7 and 9, Flood Control Act of December 
22, 1944, Corps of Engineers is responsible for 
detailed scheduling of operations involving storage 
capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in 
reservoirs constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation as 
well as those constructed by the Corps of Engineers. 
Costs for FY 1995 were $382,945; and total costs to 
September 30, 1995 were $7,842,092. 
24. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood 
Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., 
and antecedent legislation.) 
Federal costs for FY 1995 were $443,511 for disaster 
preparedness, $419,728 for emergency operations, 
$27,119 for rehabilitation and $15,986 for advance 
measures. 
Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically 
Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control 
Act as amended, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 
1948). 
Federal costs for FY 1995 were $104,818 for reconnaissance 
studies, $122,409 for feasibility studies, 
$180,449 for plans and specifications and construction 
measures, and $935 for litigation on a completed project. 
See Table 26-L for detailed breakdown by project. 
Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood 
Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946.) 
Operations under this heading were as follows: 
Federal costs for FY 1995 were $7,136 for projects in the 
feasibility phase and $5,487 for projects in the plans and 
specifications and construction phase. See Table 26-L 
for detailed breakdown by project. 
26-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT 
OF ENVIRONMENT 
25. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR 
IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
These project modifications are accomplished 
under the authority of Section 1135, Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) as 
amended. Environmental modification study efforts 
during FY 1995 were as follows: California Bend, 
NE, project cost (Feasibility Phase) $89,200; Hidden 
Lake, NE, project cost (Feasibility Phase and completion 
and Plans and Specs Phase initiation) $98,300; 
Boyer Chute, NE, project cost (Post-Construction 
Monitoring) $63,800; Deroin Bend, MO project cost 
(Feasibility Phase) $70,900. 
26. BOYER CHUTE, NE 
Location. The side channel connecting river mile 
633.5 to 637.7 on the Missouri River in Washington 
County, NE, about 7 miles north of Omaha, NE. 
Existing project. The project was constructed 
from October 1992 to April 1993. Its purpose is to 
restore flows from the Missouri River into an old 
river channel, Boyer Chute. This has restored fish 
breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, 
and will benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. 
The part of the old channel that was filled with 
sediment and grown up in young trees was cleared of 
vegetation, and a pilot channel for new inflows was 
excavated through it. Soil excavated from the pilot 
channel was placed along the channel, and will be 
washed away by restored chute flows over time. A 
180-foot wide notch in the upstream river bank was 
constructed for new inflows, and the chute's old 
outlet at the downstream end was widened. The 
culvert crossing of a road across the chute was replaced 
by a bridge, which passes adequate flows to 
prevent backwater effects and sedimentation. The 
total cost of about $2.3 million was 25 percent costshared 
by a non-Federal sponsor. 
Local cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRD \ 
applies. The Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources 
District provided all needed cost-sharing, including real 
estate interests valued at approximately $527,000 and 
cash of about $56,000. 
Operations during FY. A final project inspection 
was performed on May 3, 1995; and the project was 
turned over to the local sponsor. The channel restoration 
restored three miles and 50 acres of flowing water 
area for river fish spawning, rearing, feeding, and resting. 
The restored chute is providing a restored waterfowl and 
wading bird habitat as well as a turtle and furbearer 
habitat. The adjacent lands are being restored into forest 
and prairie. 
27. CALIFORNIA BEND, NE 
Location. The remnant river channel and floodplain 
land along river miles 648.5 - 650.0 along the Missouri 
River, in Washington County, about one mile east of 
Blair, NE. 
Project. The project to be modified is the Missouri 
River Navigation and Bank Stabilization Project. The 
California Bend modification would restore river flows 
through the historic river channel adjacent to the navigation 
channel, to restore fish breeding, brood rearing, 
resting and feeding habitat, and to benefit the riverine 
ecosystem as a whole. The downstream end of a 1.5-mile 
long remnant channel would be enlarged to provide a 
permanent connection to the navigation channel, and 
about 1 mile of excavation would connect its upstream 
end to the river. This would create permanent flows 
through about 1.5 miles of channels. Some of the 
surrounding farmland would be restored to floodplain 
forest. Also several of the spur dikes along the 
navigation channel would be lowered to enable navigation 
flows to create shallow margins along the river. 
Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA 
applies. The Papio-Missouri Natural Resources District 
would provide all needed cost-sharing, including real 
estate interests valued at approximately $255,000, and 
cash of about $240,000. 
Operations during FY. Feasibility Studies were initiated 
and remain underway. 
26-10

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
28. DEROIN BEND, MO 
Location. The floodplain land and watered areas 
riverward of Levee L-536, river mile 516.5 to 521.0 
along the Missouri River, in Holt and Atchison 
Counties, about 2.5 miles west of Corning, MO. 
Project. The project to be modified is the Missouri 
River Navigation and Bank Stabilization Project. 
The Deroin Bend modification would restore a 
diversity of river flows along this reach of the Missouri 
River floodplain, to restore fish breeding, brood 
rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and to benefit 
the riverine ecosystem as a whole. A one mile long 
lake would be connected to the river at its upstream 
end, and its downstream end would be connected to 
small channels in the floodplain that would be 
excavated to the river. This would create permanent 
flows through about five miles of channels. The surrounding 
lands would be restored to floodplain forest. 
Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA 
applies. The Missouri Department of Conservation 
would provide all needed cost-sharing, including real 
estate interests valued at approximately $400,000 and 
cash about $155,000. The sponsor has already purchased 
some of the necessary tracts. 
Operations during FY. Feasibility Studies were 
initiated and remain underway. The sponsor pursued 
land acquisitions on its own initiative. 
29. HIDDEN LAKE/GREAT MARSH, NE 
Location. A historic backwater adjacent to 
Missouri River miles 602.5-603.5, and a nearby marsh, 
in Sarpy County, about 1 mile south of Omaha and 
adjacent to Bellevue, NE. 
Project. The project to be modified is the 
Missouri River Navigation and Bank Stabilization 
Project. The Hidden Lake modification would 
restore a historic backwater of the river to restore 
fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding 
habitat, and to benefit the riverine ecosystem as a 
whole. A one mile long backwater lake which was 
filled with sediment in a rare flood event would be 
excavated and be reconnected at its downstream end 
to the river. The Great marsh modification would 
remove sediment and encroaching plants to deepen and 
expand a marshy wetland, extending its life and benefiting 
the aquatic community. The wetland, would be excavated 
at an average of two feet deeper and increased in an 
area by 44 percent. Total project costs are $3,300,000 
million, with a Federal share of $2,500,000. 
MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING 
POWER 
30. BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARPE, 
MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD 
Location. On the Missouri River, 987.4 miles above 
the mouth, near Fort Thompson, SD, and approximately 
20 miles upstream from Chamberlain, SD. Dam is 
located in the upstream reach of Fort Randall reservoir 
(Lake Francis Case). Big Bend reservoir (Lake Sharpe) 
extends upstream to Pierre, SD. 
Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam 95 feet high, 
with a crest length of 10,570 feet, a hydroelectric generating 
plant consisting of five 58,500 kilowatt units, three 
67,276 kilowatt units, and a chute-type gated spillway. 
Reservoir provides gross storage of 1,859,000 acre-feet. 
Federal cost of the project was $107,498,000. Construction 
began in September 1959 and was completed in 
September 1977, except for Code 710 recreation facilities.
Local cooperation. None required except for recreation 
cost-sharing. 
Operation during FY. Maintenance: Project was 
operated in conjunction with other Missouri River 
reservoirs for flood control, power production and other 
multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance 
procedures were accomplished during the FY. 
During the period, 892,635,000 net kilowatt-hours of 
electricity were produced. 
31. FORT PECK DAM AND LAKE,MT 
Location. The reservoir is in the Missouri River 
Valley in McCone, Valley, Garfield, Phillips, Petroleum, 
and Fergus Counties, MT. Dam is approximately 1,771.6 
miles above the mouth of the Missouri River. Nearest 
26-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
towns are Glasgow, 17 miles northwest; and Nashua, 
nine miles north. 
Existing project. A hydraulic earthfill dam with 
a maximum height of 251 feet, with a crest length of 
21,026 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, 
navigation, hydroelectric power, and other 
purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 18,688,000 
acre-feet at maximum operating pool. Work started 
on the original project in October 1933 and on the 
second power plant in August 1956. The project was 
completed in 1965. The power installations at the 
project were uprated in FY 1979. The five generators 
have a total output of 185,250 KW: two generators 
at 40,000 KW each, two generators at 43,500 
KW each and one generator at 18,250 KW. See 
page 818 of 1965 Annual Report and page 905 of 
1958 Annual Report for project details. Federal cost 
of the project was $158,428,000, 
Local cooperation. None required except for 
recreation cost-sharing. 
Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project 
was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri 
River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power 
production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal 
operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished 
during the FY. Generating facilities produced 
943,391,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 
32. FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS 
CASE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD 
Location. Located on the Missouri River in 
Charles Mix and Gregory Counties, SD, about 82 
miles above Yankton, SD. Site is 880 miles above 
the mouth of the Missouri River and 148 miles above 
Sioux City, IA. 
Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with a 
maximum height of 165 feet; a crest length of 10,700 
feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, 
navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, 
with a gross storage capacity of 5,494,000 acre-feet at 
maximum operating pool. The power installation 
consists of eight units rated at 40,000 kilowatts each. 
Construction began in May 1946 and was completed 
in 1969, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. 
Federal cost of the project was $199,066,000. Non- 
Federal contribution for constructing approaches to the 
Platte-Winner Bridge was $720,000. 
Local cooperation. None required except for 
recreation cost-sharing and bridge approaches. 
Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project was 
operated in conjunction with other Missouri River 
reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, 
and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and 
maintenance procedures were accomplished during the 
FY. Generating facilities produced 1,756,949,000 net 
kilowatt-hours of electricity. 
33. GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, 
MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND 
Location. Located on the Missouri River in McLean 
and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of 
Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND. 
1,389.9 miles above the mouth and 75 miles above 
Bismarck, ND. 
Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam 11,300 feet 
long with a maximum height of 210 feet, and a reservoir 
for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric 
power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity 
of 23,821,000 acre-feet. It provides five power units 
(three units rated at 109,250 kilowatts each and two units 
rated at 95,000 kilowatts each), three flood control 
tunnels, and a gated spillway. Federal cost of the project 
was $299,938,000, including $4,208,000 for major rehabilitation. 
Non-Federal contribution in connection with 
widening Snake Creek Embankment was $687,000. 
Construction of the project was initiated in April 1946 
and completed in 1966, except for recreational development 
using Code 710 funds. 
Local cooperation. None required except costsharing 
with the state of North Dakota for widening the 
Snake Creek Embankment and recreation cost-sharing. 
Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project was 
operated in conjunction with other Missouri River 
reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, 
and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and 
maintenance procedures were accomplished during the 
26-12

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
FY. Generating facilities produced 2,053,897,000 net 
kilowatt-hours of electricity. 
34. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK 
LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD 
Location. On the Missouri River in Yankton 
County, SD, and Knox County, NE, about four miles 
upstream from Yankton, SD, and 811.1 miles above 
the mouth. 
Existing project. A concrete and rolled earth-fill 
dam with a maximum height of 74 feet, and a reservoir 
for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric 
power, and other purposes, with a gross 
storage capacity of 492,000 acre-feet at maximum 
operating pool. The power installation consists of 
three units rated at 44,099 kilowatts each. Federal 
cost of the project was $49,617,000. Construction of 
the original project was initiated in March 1952 and 
completed in 1964. 
Local cooperation. None required except for recreation 
cost-sharing. 
Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project was 
operated in conjunction with other Missouri River 
reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, 
and other multiple purpose uses. Normal 
operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished 
during the FY. Generating facilities produced 
748,355,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity 
during FY. 
35. OAHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI 
RIVER BASIN, SD AND ND 
Location. Dam is on the Missouri River in 
Hughes and Stanley Counties, SD, about six miles 
northwest of Pierre, SD, and 1,072.3 miles above the 
mouth. 
Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with 
maximum height of 245 feet; a crest length of 9,300 
feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, 
navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, 
with a gross storage capacity of 23,137,000 acre-feet 
at maximum operating pool. It contains seven power 
units rated at 112,290 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the 
project was $346,521,000. Construction was initiated in 
August 1948 and the project was placed in operation in 
June 1963. 
Local cooperation. None required except for recreation 
cost-sharing. 
Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project was 
operated in conjunction with other Missouri River 
reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, 
and other multiple purposes uses. Normal operation and 
maintenance procedures were accomplished during the 
FY. Generating facilities produced 2,488,756,000 net 
kilowatt-hours of electricity. 
36. MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER 
CONTROL MANUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE 
Location. The area being studied is the Missouri 
River basin, to include the Missouri River main stem 
system. States included in the study area include Nebraska, 
Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, 
Kansas, and Missouri. 
Existing project. During 1987 through 1992, the 
Missouri River basin experienced a moderate to severe 
drought, impacting upon the Missouri River main stem 
projects for the first time since filled in 1967. The 
drought has had severe impacts on people and industries 
who use the Missouri River and the main stem reservoirs 
for navigation, hydropower, water supply, and recreation. 
Some of the people impacted by the drought have stated 
that the current Master Water Control Manual for the 
Missouri River main stem system of reservoirs does not 
adequately take into consideration the contemporary 
needs of the basin. The purpose of the Missouri River 
Master Water Control Manual Review and Update study 
is to determine the water control plan that best meets 
the needs of the Missouri River basin. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations/Activities during FY. A draft Environmental 
Impact Statement (EIS) for the Missouri River 
Master Water Control Manual Review and Update was 
released for public review in September 1994. A public 
comment period was initiated with the release of the 
Draft EIS and was completed on March 1, 1995. Public 
26-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 
workshops and hearings were held at 21 locations in 
the Missouri River basin, as well as in Memphis, 
Tennessee; Quincy, Illinois; and New Orleans, Louisiana. 
At the completion of the public comment 
period, all comments were evaluated to determine 
the scope of studies required to respond to the 
numerous Draft EIS comments. As a result of this 
evaluation, it was determined that additional or 
revised analyses were necessary for interior drainage 
and groundwater impacts landward of levees, Missouri 
and Mississippi River navigation, and Missouri 
River native river fish. These additional analyses 
were initiated during FY 95. 
MISCELLANEOUS 
37. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 
PROGRAM (NEPP) AND SUPPORT FOR FEMA 
P.L. 93-288 (and Antecedent Legislation) 
Mobilization Preparedness 
Continuity of Government Preparedness 
Facilities Preparedness 
Total NEPP 
40. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
FY 1995 costs totaled $2,511,461 for all General 
Investigation activities. See Table 26-K which covers 
Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, Research 
and Development, Preconstruction Engineering and 
Design (projects not fully authorized), Planning and 
Engineering under Proposed Program Legislation, and 
Preconstruction Engineering and Design (fully authorized 
projects). 
$ 72,848 
94,457 
16,970 
$ 184,275 
38. FLOOD CONTROL AND COSTAL EMERGENCIES 
(FC&CE) 
Flood control work under Authorization Emergency 
Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting. P.L. 84-99. 
Disaster Preparedness 
Emergency Operations 
Rehabilitation 
Flood Flight and Rescue Operations 
Total FC&CE 
$ 443,511 
27,119 
186,720 
4,407 
$ 661,757 
39. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS 
Permit Evaluation 
Enforcement 
Studies 
Environmental Impact Studies 
Total Regulatory 
$2,882,026 
604,331 
9,972 
89,812 
$3,586,147 
26-14

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost to 
Section September 30, 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 1995 
1. Missouri River, 
Sioux City, IA 
to Mouth (Sioux 
City, IA to Rulo 
NE) 
3. Bear Creek Lake, 
CO 
4. Bowman-Haley 
Lake, ND 
5. Chatfield Lake, 
CO 
(Required 
Contributed 
Funds) 
(Consolidated 
Summary) 
6. Cherry Creek 
Lake, CO 
7. Fall River 
Basin, SD 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
1,600,000 
1,590,134 
-9,992 
272,000 
313,839 
142,000 
169,372 
15,000 
87,021 
15,000 
87,021 
1,358,000 
1,360,634 
477,000 
472,666 
308,200 
377,049 
1,755,000 
1,590,008 
322,000 
277,154 
187,000 
193,200 
10,382 
10,382 
1,384,000 
1,271,198 
502,000 
395,177 
561,000 
490,675 
1,288,000 
1,505,651 
293,000 
342,890 
221,000 
231,368 
300,000 
-9,927 
-32,286 
2,802 
990,000 
915,234 
506,000 
602,318 
468,000 
510,420 
1,571,000 
1,745,893 
320,000 
334,567 
160,000 
171,298 
-28,690 
---- N 
-3,596% 
12,729 
988,000 
1,058,269 
984,000 
485,003 
392,000 
434,549 
189,225,991 1 
189,225,991 1 
119,932,450 
119,896,523 
62,018,608 
62,018,608 
4,198,609 
4,197,871 
4,372,174 
4,372,174 
3,360,270 
3,359,289 
95,444,010 
95,444,010 
1,315,328 
1,315,328 
96,759,338 
96,759,338 
10,540,230 
10,419,700 
15,220,364 
15,220,364 
11,058,474 
11,055,795 
--- 5,538,432 
---- 5,538,432 
6,359,201 
6,392,084 
/ Includes $18,325,581 National Industrial Recovery Act funds, $8,625,718 Emergency Relief Funds, and $1,181,125 for previous project. 
26-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost to 
Section September 30, 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 1995 
8. Lost Creek, 
Columbus, NE 
(Required 
Contributed 
Funds) 
(Consolidated 
Summary) 
9. Missouri National 
Recreational River 
NE& SD 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
10. Missouri River Maint. 
Between Ft. Peck Approp. 
Dam MT & Gavins Cost. 
Point Dam, SD and NE 
11. Missouri River New Work: 
Fish & Wildlife Approp. 
Mitigation, IA, Cost. 
NE, KS, MO 
12. Missouri River New Work: 
Kenslers Bend, Approp. 
NE, to Sioux Cost. 
City, IA Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
13. Papillion Creek New Work: 
and Tributaries Approp. 
Lakes, NE Cost. 
Required New Work: 
Contributed Approp. 
Funds Cost. 
Consolidated New Work: 
Summary Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
-40,000 
15,475 
-35,385 
20,090 
52,123 
193,000 
261,733 
150,000 
71,546 
455,000 
239,970 
49,000 
51,378 
1,802,000 
1,716,285 
---- N 
120,000 
1,802,000 
1,836,285 
598,000 
619,452 
10,000 
10,207 
4,615 
4,615 
10,000 
10,207 
51,000 
36,577 
193,000 
160,055 
55,000 
113,026 
2,100,000 
1,927,838 
51,000 
53,917 
3,654,000 
1,822,792 
400,000 
53,350 
4,054,000 
1,876,142 
743,000 
734,505 
15,000 
16,986 
-14,200 
935 
3,590,318 
3,589,780 
151,915 
151,915 
15,000 
16,986 
107,000 
84,626 
45,000 
172,845 
350,000 
202,702 
6,133,000 
4,008,041 
54,000 
46,829 
5,351,453 
5,876,663 
250,000 
446,198 
5,601,453 
6,322,861 
612,000 
628,210 
377,800 
435,484 
84,000 
106,653 
346,000 
36,312 
559,281 
484,314 
3,510,000 
4,807,055 
1,000 
10,621 
N---- 
2,507,51 
120,000 
221,611 
120,000 
2,729,180 
556,000 
583,738 
4,134,283 
4,176,243 
1,955,800 
1,934,089 
2,045,000 
1,710,270 
1,114,281 
871,588 
12,198,000 
10,982,904 
11,294,414 
11,294,414 
4,777,419 
4,776,884 
66,612,215 2 
66,252,878 2 
955,000 
841,209 
67,567,215 
67,094,087 
7,355,440 
7,338,250 
/ Does not include $1,854,338 cost of inactive sites. 
26-16

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost to 
Section September 30, 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 1995 
14. Pebble Creek 
Seribner, NE 
Required 
Contributed 
Funds 
Consolidated 
Summary 
15. Perry Creek, IA 
17. Pipestem Lake, 
ND 
18. Salt Creek and 
Tributaries, NE 
20. Thurman to 
Hamburg, IA 
21. Westerly 
Creek, CO 
Required 
Contributed 
Funds 
Consolidated 
Summary 
22. Inspections of 
Completed Local 
Protection Projects 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
30,000 
55,408 
30,000 
55,408 
429,000 
416,390 
426,000 
568,760 
183,000 
647,106 
189,890 
100,000 
372,890 
747,165 
218,000 
223,432 
45,000 
38,891 
42 
45,000 
38,933 
564,000 
445,823 
354,000 
327,755 
644,000 
564,354 
10,184 
---- 
87,465 
97,649 
223,000 
200,224 
534,000 
486,314 
144,500 
136,135 
678,500 
622,449 
905,547 
573,904 
324,000 
333,125 
743,000 
782,635 
711,000 
171,076 
12,586 
--- N 
5,690 
M- 
18,276 
216,000 
237,014 
273,000 
135,041 
126,400 
81,221 
399,400 
216,262 
4,398,700 
388,253 
494,000 
535,194 
664,000 
706,138 
40,357 
-66,700 
-66,700 
-26,634 
66,660 
-93,334 
-- 
364,000 
364,757 
2,790,728 
2,596,840 
435,656 
380,159 
3,226,384 
2,977,008 
5,868,248 
1,407,980 
9,277,545 
9,277,545 
5,985,404 
5,981,706 
12,197,621 3 
12,197,621 3 
13,002,270 
12,994,576 
711,000 
211,434 
8,575,757 
8,575,757 
773,250 
773,250 
9,349,014 
9,349,014 
4,554,476 
4,552,465 
y Includes $123,000 of government cost applicable to that portion of the project which is currently being carried in a deferred status. 
26-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost to 
Section September 30, 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 1995 
23. Scheduling Flood 
Control Reservoir 
Operations 
26. Boyer Chute, NE 
Required 
Contributed 
Funds 
Consolidated 
Summary 
California Bend, 
Required 
Contributed 
Funds 
Consolidated 
Summary 
Deroin Bend, MO 
Required 
Contributed 
Funds 
Consolidated 
Summary 
Funds 
Hidden Lake/Great 
Marsh, NE 
Required 
Contributed 
Consolidated 
Summary 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
353,000 
375,595 
1,345,000 
147,263 
N---- 
1,345,000 
147,000 
369,000 
350,362 
231,000 
1,296,297 
--- 
231,000 
1,296,297 
390,000 
357,059 
-33,000 
109,590 
1--- 
-33,000 
109,590 
2,500 
2,256 
2,500 
2,256 
2,500 
2,491 
15,000 
5,526 
97,000 
100,092 
2,500 
2,491 
67,000 
73,333 
365,000 
382,945 
85,000 
64,388 
9,377 
85,000 
64,388 
90,000 
89,229 
90,000 
89,229 
77,000 
70,856 
77,000 
70,856 
118,000 
77,218 
7,863,684 
7,861,861 
1,729,500 
1,617,448 
9,377 
1,729,500 
1,617,448 
92,500 
91,485 
92,500 
91,485 
79,500 
73,348 
79,500 
73,348 
297,000 
277,218 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
15,000 
5,526 
97,000 
100,092 
67,000 
73,333 
18,000 
98,267 
97,000 
277,218 
26-18 
27. 
28. 
29.

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost to 
Section September 30, 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 1995 
30. Big Bend Dam- 
Lake Sharpe, 
Missouri River 
Basin, SD 
31. Fort Peck Lake, 
MT 
32. Fort Randall 
Dam-Lake Francis 
Case, Missouri 
River Basin, SD 
Garrison Dam 
Lake Sakakawea, 
Missouri River 
Basin, ND 
Federal Funds 
Contributed 
Funds 
34. Gavins Point 
Dam-Lewis & 
Clark Lake, 
Missouri River 
Basin, 
NE and SD 
New Work: 
Approp 
Cost. 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Major Rehab: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Major Rehab: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
6,605,000 
6,051,036 
3,458,000 
3,136,266 
6,822,500 
6,723,347 
7,466,725 
7,519,345 
5,204,000 
5,337,876 
5,822,400 
5,452,454 
3,209,000 
3,461,889 
7,945,000 
7,255,826 
8,217,000 
7,835,759 
4,404,000 
4,359,645 
5,601,000 
5,183,660 
3,722,411 
3,807,697 
7,591,035 
7,892,167 
8,226,915 
8,401,057 
5,070,657 
4,754,001 
5,818,169 
6,641,604 
3,897,000 
3,931,300 
107,497,597 
107,497,597 
91,260,273 4 
91,233,510 4 
158,428,080 
158,428,080 
83,952,834 4 
83,899,363 4 
199,065,883 
199,065,883 
7,354,000 144,043,634 4 
8,218,957 143,923,228 4 
295,729,613 
295,729,613 
9,115,000 160,107,673 4 
9,606,252 159,992,448 4 
4,208,310 
4,208,310 
686,961 
686,961 
49,617,239 
49,617,239 
8,560,000 106,486,912 4 
9,124,583 106,436,177 4 
4 Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. 
26-19 
33.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost to 
Section September 30, 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 1995 
35. Oahe Dam-Lake 
Oahe, Missouri 
River Basin, 
SD & ND 
36. Missouri River 
Section 33 
37. Missouri River 
Master Water 
Control Manual 
Review and Update 
New Work: 
Approp. ----- ----- 
Cost. ----- ----- 
Maint: 
Approp. 8,365,000 9,348,000 
Cost. 8,369,210 8,569,562 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost. 
2,939,000 
2,946,307 
159,333 
172,918 
1,967,000 
1,684,704 
----- 346,520,603 
----- 346,520,603 
10,033,904 
10,275,626 
202,702 
362,869 
979,000 
1,406,113 
9,010,000 158,410,500 4 
9,587,527 158,234,859 4 
484,313 
847,339 
3,240,000 
3,242,717 
2,622,076 
1,159,663 
15,064,000 
14,777,870 
4/ Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. 
26-20

OMAHIA, NE DISTRICT 
TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing Project and Work 
in Text Act Authorized Documents 
1. 
Jan 12, 1927 
July 3, 1930 
Aug 30, 1935 
Mar 2, 1945 
3. 
Aug 13, 1968 
Flood Control 
Act of 1962 
Flood control 
Act of 1950 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1986 
6. 
Aug 18, 1941 
Dec 22, 1944 
Dec 22, 1944 
Aug 18, 1941 
June 30, 1948 
MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH 
(SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) 
Appropriation of $12 million authorized for 
securing a 6 foot depth from Quindaro Bend 
(Kansas City, MO to Sioux City, IA). 
Appropriation of $15 million additional allotments 
totaling $29,153,108 made by Public Works 
Administration under provisions of National 
Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 
allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief 
Appropriations Act of 1935. 
For completion of project from mouth to Sioux City, IA. 
For a channel of 9-foot depth and 300-foot width. 
BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO 
A flood control reservoir for protection of 
metropolitan Denver, CO. 
BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND 
Flood Control reservoir and water supply. 
CHATFIELD LAKE, CO 
Flood control reservoir and channel improvements 
to provide downstream protection for Denver, CO. 
Modified 1950 Flood Control Act to operate dam 
and other Federal improvements to achieve 
authorized level of protection, beginning at dam 
and ending 82 miles downstream. Reassigns a 
portion of the storage space in the lake project to 
joint flood control-conservation purposes. Modified 
1974 WRDA to exempt prohibition of encroachment 
for Mineral Ave/ Ken Caryl Rd. ext & 
transmission line. 
CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO 
Initiation and partial accomplishment of project. 
Completion of plan approved in Act of Aug 18, 1941. 
General comprehensive plan, Missouri River Basin. 
FALL RIVER BASIN, SD 
Provide flood control to the town of Hot Springs, SD. 
LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE 
Levee and channel improvement for local 
protection - Section 205. 
H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong. 
PL 71-520 
PL 73-67 
H. Doc 238, 73rd Cong. 
PL 74-409 
H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong. 
PL 79-14 
S. Doc. 87, 90th Cong. 
PL 90-483 
H. Doc. 574, 87th Cong. 
PL 87-874 
H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. 
PL 81-516 
H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. 
PL 99-662 
H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. 
PL 77-228 
H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. 
PL 78-534 
H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 
191 and 247, 78th Cong. 
PL 78-534 
H. Doc. 655, 76th Cong. 
PL 77-228 
PL 858, 80th Cong. 
26-21 
5. 
&

REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing Project and Work 
in Text Act Authorized Documents 
National parks 
and Recreation 
Act of 1978 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1988 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
Of 1986 
Aug 18, 1941 
June 30, 1948 
Flood Control 
Act of 1968 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1986 
June 30, 1948 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1986 
June 28, 1938 
Aug 18, 1941 
Dec 22, 1944 
July 24, 1946 
May 17, 1950 
MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD 
Preservation and enhancement of the Missouri 
River between the reaches from Gavins Point 
Dam, NE & SD to Ponca State Park, NE. 
MISSOURI RIVER BETWEEN FT. PECK DAM ,MT & 
GAVINS POINT DAM, SD & NE 
Undertake measures to alleviate bank erosion and related 
problems associated with releases along the Missouri 
River from the six main stem dams. 
PL 95-625 
Section 33, 
PL 100-676 
MISSOURI RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, MO 
Mitigate fish and wildlife losses resulting from the con- Section 601, 
struction and operation of the Missouri River Bank PL 99-662 
Stabilization and Navigation project. 
MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA 
Construction of dike, revetments. H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. 
PL 77-228 
PL 80-858 
PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE 
Series of flood control reservoirs, providing protection 
for the metropolitan areas of Omaha, NE. 
Authorized additional $4.8 million for channel 
improvement on Big Papillon Creek, and to 
Union Pacific RR bridge, rec trail and flood 
warning system. 
PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE 
Levee and channel improvement for local 
protection - Section 205. 
PERRY CREEK, IA 
Provide flood protection for Perry Creek, Iowa. 
PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) 
Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River basin and authorized $9 million for 
initiation and partial accomplishment. 
Modified general comprehensive plan to include 
Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican 
River, NE and authorized additional $7 million. 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River 
Basin and authorized additional $200 million. 
Authorized additional $150 million for prosecution 
of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 
Authorized additional $250 million for prosecution 
of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 
H. Doc. 349, 90th Cong. 
PL 90-485 
H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. 
PL 99-662 
858, 80th Cong. 
Section 401, 
PL 99-662 
Flood Control Committee 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong. 
PL 75-761 
H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong. 
PL 77-228 
H. Doc. 475, and S. Does. 191 
and 247, 78th Cong. 
PL 78-534 
PL 79-526 
PL 81-516 
26-22 
9. 
10. 
11. 
12. 
13. 
14. 
15. 
16.

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing Project and Work 
in Text Act Authorized Documents 
16. 
Flood Control Act 
of 27 Oct 1965 
July 3, 1958 
(continued) PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) 
Sep 3, 1954 
Sep 3, 1954 
May2, 1956 
July 3, 1958 
July 14, 1960 
Dec 30, 1963 
June 18, 1965 
Aug 13, 1968 
June 19, 1970 
Dec 24, 1970 
Dec 31, 1970 
Dec 23, 1971 
Mar 7, 1974 
July 8, 1976 
Nov 16, 1977 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized additional $217,710,000. 
Authorized $5,384,014 to compensate Sioux Indians for 
reservation lands required for Oahe, South Dakota project. 
Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin by deletion of construction of Red 
Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of 
construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. 
Authorized additional $207 million for prosecution 
of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 
Authorized additional $80 million for prosecution 
of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin 
and modified the plan to include work protection 
and rectification works below Garrison Dam. 
Authorized additional $116 million for prosecution 
of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 
Authorized additional $38 million for prosecution 
of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 
Authorized additional $109 million for prosecution 
of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 
Changed comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan 
Missouri Basin Program. 
Oahe Dam and Reservoir, ND. 
Authorized additional $101 million for prosecution 
of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. 
Authorized additional $72 million for prosecution 
of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. 
Authorized additional $85 million for prosecution 
of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. 
Authorized additional $59 million for prosecution 
of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. 
PIPESTEM LAKE, ND 
Provide flood control for Jamestown, ND and 
downstream areas. 
SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE 
Series of dams and channel improvements for flood 
control around Lincoln, NE. 
26-23 
H. Docs. 549 and 642, 81st 
Cong. 
PL 83-780 
PL 83-776 
PL 84-505 
H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. 
P. L 85-500 
P. L 86-645 
P. L 88-253 
P. L 89-042 
P. L 90-483 
H. Doc. 91-748 and 
S. Doc. 91-895 
P. L 91-282 
S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. 
P. L 91-576 
H. Doc. 91-23 and 
P. L 91-611 
P. L 92-222 
P.L 93-251 
P. L 94-347 
P. L 95-189 
H. Doc. 266, 89th Cong. 
P. L 89-298 
H. Doc. 396, 84th Cong. 
P. L . 85-500 
17. 
1I.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing Project and Work 
in Text Act Authorized Documents 
May 17, 1950 
May 12, 1967 
Aug 13, 1968 
June 19, 1970 
Dec 23, 1971 
Mar 7, 1974 
July 8, 1976 
Nov 16, 1977 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1986 
Nov 17, 1986 
Nov 17, 1986 
Nov 17, 1986 
Nov 17, 1986 
Nov 17, 1986 
Dec. 22, 1944 
June 16, 1933 
Aug 30, 1935 
May 18, 1938 
19. 
26-24 
SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO 
Adopted plan of improvement for South Platte H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. 
River Basin and authorized $26.3 million for P. L. 81-516 
initiation and partial accomplishment. 
Authorized additional $2 million for prosecution of plan. P. L 90-17 
Authorized additional $12 million for prosecution of plan. P. L. 90-843 
Authorized additional $21 million for prosecution of plan. P. L . 91-282 
Authorized additional $37 million for prosecution of plan. P. L . 92-222 
Authorized additional $15 million for prosecution of plan. P. L 93-251 
Authorized additional $22 million for prosecution of plan. P. L 94-347 
Authorized additional $3 million for prosecution of plan. P. L 95-189 
THURMAN TO HAMBURG, IA 
Install pumping facilities to prevent flooding in the Thurman Section 1152 
to Hamburg area of the Missouri River in western Fremont P. L. 99-662 
County, IA. 
WESTERLY CREEK, CO 
Provide flood control for metropolitan Denver, CO P. L 99-662 
BOYER CHUTE, NE P .L 99-662 
Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 
1986, as amended; environmental improvement 
CALIFORNIA BEND, NE 
Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of P. L 99-662 
1986, as amended; environmental improvement 
DEROIN BEND, MO 
Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of P. L 99-662 
1986, as amended; environmental improvement 
HIDDEN ILAKF/GREAT MARSH 
Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of P. L 99-662 
1986, as amended; environmental improvement 
BIG BEND DAM - LAKE SHARPE, SD 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475 and S. Doc. 247, 
and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 78th Cong. PL 78-534 
FORT PECK LAKE, MT 
Construction of earth dam, as recommended by Chief of H. Doc. 238, 73rd Cong. 
Engineers Sep 30, 1933, was approved by Executive Order P .L 74-409 
by the President and included in Public Works Administration 
program, Oct 14, 1933 as authorized by the National Industrial 
Recovery Act of 1933 and adopted by the River and Harbor 
Act of 1935 (PL 74-409). 
Completion, maintenance, and operation of a hydroelectric P. L 75-529 
power plant, subject to certain provisions in act respecting 
transmission and sale of electric energy. Also authorizes 
installation of additional power-generating facilities by 
Secretary of War when deemed necessary in judgment of 
Bureau of Reclamation. 
20. 
21. 
26. 
27. 
28. 
29. 
30. 
31.

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing Project and Work 
in Text Act Authorized Documents 
31. (continued) FORT PECK LAKE, MT 
Dec 22, 1944 
June 3, 1948 
Water Resources 
Development Act 
of 1986 
Dec 22, 1944 
Dec. 22, 1944 
PWA 1968 
Dec. 22, 1944 
Modified authorization to provide for full multiple purpose 
operation. 
Payments to be made to school districts serving project as 
reimbursement for educational facilities (including transportation 
to and from school) for pupils who are dependents 
of persons engaged in construction, operation, and maintenance 
of projects 
Modified authorization to include recreation as a 
project purpose. 
FORT RANDALL DAM - LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control 
and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 
GARRISON DAM - LAKE SAKAKAWEA, 
MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control 
and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 
GAVINS POINT DAM - LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, 
MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control 
and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 
OAHE DAM - LAKE OAHE, 
MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD & ND 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control 
and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 
MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER CONTROL 
MANUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control 
and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 
H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 
and 247, 78th Cong. 
P .L 78-534 
P. L 80-586 
H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. 
P. L 99-662 
H. Doe. 475 and S. Docs. 191 
and 247, 78th Cong. 
P .L 78-534 
H. Doc. 475 and S. Doc. 247, 
78th Cong. PL 78-534 
H. Doc. 475 and S. Doc. 247, 
78th Cong. P. L 78-534 
H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 
and 247, 78th Cong. 
P. L .78-534 
H. Doec. 475 and S. Docs. 191 
and 247, 78th Cong. 
P. L 78-534 
26-25 
32. 
33. 
34. 
35. 
Dec. 22, 1944 
36. 
Dec 22, 1944

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 26-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Cost Cost to September 30,1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to 
Fort Benton, MT Complete 1948 3,123,141 644,863 
Small Navigation Project at 
Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 43,582 88,716 
26-26

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
TABLE 26-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SDu' Complete 1940 37,410 
Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA Complete 1982 7,458,934 - 
Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE2 Complete 1970 262,479 - 
Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, NE2 Complete 1974 293,016- 
Buffalo Creek, Scranton, ND2 Complete 1960 102,980 - 
Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD Complete 1960 120,482 - 
City of Aurora, 
Westerly Creek, CO Complete 1955 150,000 - 
Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek Complete 1967 191,282- 
Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) Complete 1939 - 
Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) Complete 1954 2,557,680 - 
Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD Complete 1981 3,000,000- 
Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA Complete 1964 400,000- 
East Nishnabotna River 
at Red Oak, IAY Complete 1986 2,154,016 - 
Floyd River, Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 11,556,667 
Forsyth, MT Complete 1950 255,177- 
Frazer-Wolf Point, MT Complete 1982 435,000- 
Gering Valley, NE Complete 1971 5,989,663- 
Glasgow, MT Complete 1939 16,832- 
Great Falls, MT Complete 1991 11,905,000- 
Greybull, WY Complete 1960 248,507- 
Havre, MT Complete 1958 1,825,881 - 
Herreid, Spring Creek, SD Complete 1954 50,216 
Hooper, NE2 Complete 1968 326,667 
Ida Grove, IA2 Complete 1972 522,344- 
Indian Creek at Emerson, IAA Complete 1986 333,000- 
Jamestown Reservoir, ND Complete 1950 -- 
Linton, ND 2 Inactive 1973 - 
Little Papillion Creek, NE Complete 1976 3,643,111- 
Little Sioux River, IA Complete 1992 20,630,000 - 
Loup River, Columbus, NE2 Complete 1973 1,000,000 - 
Lower Heart River, ND Complete 1964 1,961,173 - 
Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND2 Complete 1991 1,153,430 - 
Madison, NE, Union and 
Taylor Creeks2 Complete 1967 234,839- 
Mandan, Heart River, ND Complete 1960 676,916- 
Marmarth, ND Complete 1960 169,498- 
McCook Lake, SD Complete 1958 147,627 
Miles City, MT Inactive 1956 - 
Missouri River, Aten, NE Complete 1951 578,791 
1/ Completed as a Public Works Administration project. 
2/ Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 
26-27

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 26-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Missouri River Levee System, 
IA, NE, KS and MO Complete 1993 37,964,177 
Missouri River, Niobrara, NE Complete 1945 99,370 
Mott, ND Deferred - - - 
Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NEV Complete 1976 1,000,000 
Nishnabotna River at 
Hamburg, IA Complete 1948 236,000- 
Norfolk, NE Complete 1971 3,400,504- 
Omaha, NE Complete 1954 5,903,640- 
Pierce, NE Complete 1967 296,597- 
Platte River Near Schuyler, NEV Complete 1948 74,940- 
Platte River and Lost Creek, 
Schuyler, NE Complete 1971 257,398- 
Platte River and Tributaries, NE Inactive - 1,538,269- 
Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD Complete 1980 1,004,000- 
Saco, MT Complete 1958 67,793- 
Sacred Heart Hospital, 
Yankton, SD Complete 1978 184,380- 
Sheridan, WYE Complete 1976 2,618,809- 
Shields River, 
Near Clyde Park, MTV Complete 1951 25,747- 
Sioux Falls, SD Complete 1966 5,288,707- 
Vaughn, MT, Sun Rivera Complete 1971 457,582- 
Waterloo, NE Complete 1970 237,883- 
West Point, NE Complete 1966 149,596- 
Yellowstone River, 
W. Glendive, MT Complete 1960 230,294- 
2/ Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 
/ Includes inactive segment. 
26-28

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
TABLE 26-F OTHER MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Gavins Point Dam - Lewis and Clark Lake, 
Relocation of Niobrara, NE Complete 1980 13,516,459 
Modification of Land Purchase Plan 
for Oahe Dam and Reservoir, Missouri 
River, ND 1/ Active - - - 
Springfield, SD Water Intake 2/ Active - - 
Williston, ND Water Intake Complete 1981 988,583 
1 Reported to Congress October 31, 1994. Project will be deauthorized 1 May 1997 unless federal funds are obligated for planning, design 
or construction. 
2] Project was reported to the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate by ASA(CW) on 8 Jan 1993 as meeting the 
deauthorization eligibility criteria of Sec 1001(b)(2) as of 30 Sep 91. Project will be deauthorized 9 July 1995 unless federal funds are 
obligated for planning, design, or construction. 
26-29

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 26-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Deauthorization Funds Funds 
Project Report For Document Expended Expended 
Billings, MT (Western Unit) 
Boulder, CO 
Buffalo, Johnson County 
Diversion Channel, WY 
Castlewood Lake, 
Douglas County, CO 
Davids Creek Lake, IA 
Dayton, WY 
Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE 
Indian Creek Lake, IA 
Lake Herman 
(Dredging), SD 
Little Nemaha River, 
Nemaha County, NE 
Milk River, 
Havre, MT 
Morrison, Bear Creek, CO 
Redwater River and 
Hay Creek, Bell Fourche, SD 
Shell Creek, NE 
1976 
1976 
1961 
1943 
1972 
1956 
1952 
1969 
N/A 
1973 
N/A 
1950 
1966 
1962 
Upper Missouri River, SD N/A 
Streambank Erosion Control Project 
Vermillion River and Tribs, SD 1968 
Sec. 201, FC Act 1950 
23 Mar 81 
FC Act 1950 
WRDA of 1986 
17 Oct 86 
FC Act 1950 
WRDA of 1986 
17 Oct 86 
PL 77-228 
WRDA of 1986 
17 Oct86 
Sec. 203, PL 90-483 
WRDA of 1986 
17 Oct 86 
Sec. 12, PL 93-251 
WRDA of 1974 
5 Aug 77 
Sec. 12, PL 93-251 
WRDA of 1974 
6 Nov 77 
Sec. 12, PL 93-251 
WRDA of 1974 
4 Jan 74 
Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 
WRDA of 1986 
17 Oct86 
Sec. 204, PL 89-298 
WRDA of 1986 
17 Oct 86 
Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 
WRDA of 1986 
17 Oct 86 
Sec. 12, PL 93-251 
WRDA of 1974 
5 Aug 77 
Sec. 12, PL 93-251 
WRDA of 1974 
4 Jan 74 
Sec. 12, PL 93-25 1 
WRDA of 1974 
3 Oct 78 
Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 
WRDA of 1986 
17 Oct 86 
Sec. 12 PL 93-251 
WRDA of 1974 
4 Jan 74 
The following investigations for flood control called for by Flood Control Acts and committee resolutions were deauthorized by WRDA of 1986, 17 Oct 86; Aowa & South 
Creek, NE; Bow Creek, NE; Cannonball River, ND; James River, ND & SD,Judith River Basin, MT; Niobrara River Basin, NE, SD & WY; Omaha Creek, NE; South Dakota 
Lakes, SD; Weeping Water Creek, NE; Windpower at Ft Peck Lake, MT; Yellowstone River below Billings, MT; South Platte River, Denver-Ft Lupton-Ft. Morgan, CO; 
Lower Big Sioux River IA & SD; Eagle Bay Highway Bridge, Missouri River Basin, ND; Sheridan, WY (Stage III); Missouri River Levee System Units: R531, R540, R553, 
R555, R577, R589, R603, R610, R623, R644, R645, R652, R661, R669, R676, R682, R686, R703, R717, R719, R725, R728, R742, R750. 
26-30 
75,000 
142,666 
135,000 
30,000 
1,000 
71,000 
208,000

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE 
TABLE 26-H 
Miles of 
Unit Levee Status 
L627-624 
L601 
L594 
R580 
L575 
R573 
R562 
L561-550 
R548 
L536 
R520 
R613 
R616 
L611-614 
L627, L624, 
L561-550 
Comprehensive 
Mosquito Creek Levee 
Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees 
Pleasant Valley Levee 
Nebraska City Levee 
Thurman-Hamburg Levee 
Otto County Drainage District No. 2 
Peru Dike 
Atchison County Levee District No. 1 
Brownville-Nemaha Levee 
Mill Creek Levee 
Richardson County Drainage District No. 8 
Papillion Creek-Platte River Levee 
Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees 
Mosquito-Keg Creek Levees 
Remedial Studies on Completed Units 
Restudy of Levee System 
14.2 
15.0 
11.4 
0.2 
45.8 
5.9 
7.6 
41.3 
19.5 
13.6 
6.3 
14.0 
4.5 
22.0 
Complete 1950 
Complete 1966 
Complete 1964 
Complete 1950 
Complete 1950 
Complete 1950 
Complete 1950 
Complete 1952 
Complete 1952 
Complete 1952 
Complete 1960 
Complete 1971 
Complete 1987 
Complete 1988 
Studies Complete 
Studies Complete 
26-31

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM 
TABLE 26-I (See Section 16 of Text) 
Estimated Estimated 
Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost 
Fort Peck Lake, MT1'2 
158,428,000 1,103,000 
Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND1'2 299,938,000 1,516,000 
Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO 
(Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE)1'3 37,931,000 4,618,000 
Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, SD and ND1'2 346,521,000 2,320,000 
Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, SD 1,2 107,498,000 302,000 
Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD 1,2 199,066,000 1,609,000 
Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE 1'2 49,617,000 137,000 
Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD 
& NE-Relocation of Niobrara, NE2 13,516,000- 
Omaha, NE2 5,904,000 362,000 
Council Bluffs, IA2 2,558,000 146,000 
Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND2 9,413,000 270,000 
Cherry Creek Lake, CO1'2 15,220,000 285,000 
1 Details presented on individual report. 2 Completed. 
3 Active portion of project 
26-32

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
INSPFCTION OF COMPT FTFT) IOCAI. PROTECTION PRO JFCTS 
TABLE 26-J (See Section 22 of Text) 
Location Month Inspected 
Montana 
Beaver Creek, Saco May 95 
Clyde Park, Shields River Aug 92 
Glasgow, Milk River Sep 92 
Havre, Milk River May 95 
Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam May 95 
Three Forks, Lower Madison River Sep 92 
Forsythe, Yellowstone River May 95 
West Glendive, Yellowstone River Sep 92 
Sun River,Vaughn May 95 
* Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston Aug 92 
Sun River, Great Falls May 95 
* Yellowstone River, Near Miles City 
Water Intake & Sewage Lagoon Inactive 
* Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings Inactive 
* Yellowstone River, Livingston (Interstate Bridge) Jun 93 
* Milk River, Chinook (Finley Bridge) Sep 92 
* Battle Creek, Chinook Sep 92 
* East Gallatin, Near Bozeman Jun 93 
* Yellowstone River, Near Livingston (Hwy 89 - 7 Miles East of Livingston) Jun 92 
* Shields River, Near Livingston (Hwy 89) Jun 92 
* Teton River, Near Choteau (Hwy 89) Sep 93 
* Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin Inactive 
* Yellowstone River, Glendive Sep 92 
Madison River, Quake Lake Sep 94 
Milk River, Malta Sep 94 
Missouri River, Bank Stabilization Project, Frazer Sep 94 
Dearborn River - Hwy 287, Wolf Creek Jun 94 
Muddy Creek - Int Hwy 15 - Frontage Road, Vaughn Jun 94 
Badger Creek - Hwy 89, Browning Jun 94 
Wyoming 
* Baldwin Creek, Leader Aug 92 
Greybull, Big Horn River May 95 
Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks May 95 
* Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell Aug 92 
* Shoshone River, Byron Aug 92 
* Powder River, Arvada Aug 92 
* Medicine Bow River, Elk Mountain Dec 91 
North Dakota 
Mandan, Lower Heart River Sep 95 
Marmarth, Little Missouri River May 95 
Scranton, Buffalo Sep 95 
26-33

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 
TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 22 of Text) 
Location Month Inspected 
South Dakota 
Big Sioux River, Union County Jul 95 
Big Sioux River, North Sioux City Jul 95 
Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River Jul 95 
Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River May 95 
Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam Jun 95 
Hot Springs, Fall River Channel Oct 95 
Herreid, Spring Creek Sep 95 
* Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood Sep 93 
* Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre Sep 92 
* Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau Jun 93 
* Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, Near Flandreau Jun 93 
Rapid Creek, Rapid City Oct 95 
Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton Jun 95 
* Vermillion River, Vermillion Jun 95 
* Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh Jun 95 
* Big Sioux River, Jefferson Jul 95 
Deadman Gulch, Sturgis Nov 95 
* Marne Creek, Yankton Jun 95 
* White River, Winner Sep 93 
* James River, Yankton Jun 95 
Colorado 
Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam Jul 95 
* Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora Sep 92 
* Cache La Poudre River, Windsor Sep 92 
* South Platte River, Kersey Aug 95 
* South Platte River, Merino Aug 95 
* South Platte River, Iliff Aug 95 
* South Platte River, Platteville Aug 95 
* Big Thompson River, Johnstown Sep 92 
Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment Plant) Sep 92 
South Platte River, Adams County, No. Washington St. 
Water and Sanitary District Sep 92 
* South Platte River, Fort Lupton Hwy 85 Sep 93 
* South Platte River, Logan County (Bridges 175A & 173) Aug 95 
Nebraska 
* Blackbird Creek, Decatur Apr 95 
Omaha, Missouri River Nov 95 
Waterloo, Elkhorn River May 95 
West Point, Elkhorn River Aug 95 
Pierce, Elkhorn River Jun 95. 
Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek Aug 95 
Hooper, Elkhorn River May 95 
Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River Apr 95 
Madison, Union & Taylor Creeks Jul 95 
* Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island Feb 92 
* Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville Feb 92 
* Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, Near Gretna Aug 92 
* Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, Near Norfolk Mar 92 
26-34

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 
TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 22 of Text) 
Location Month Inspected 
Nebraska (continued) 
* North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare Oct 92 
* Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft Mar 92 
* Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek Feb 92 
Schuyler, Lost Creek & Platte River Aug 95 
Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek Jun 95 
Gering Valley, Gering Drain & Tributaries Sep 93 
Macy, Blackbird Creek May 95 
Lincoln, Salt Creek & Tributaries Nov 95 
Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek Apr 95 
Columbus, Loup River Aug 95 
Broken Bow, Mud Creek Sep 95 
* Little Nemaha River, Tangeman Mar 92 
* Julian, Rock Creek Inactive 
* Muddy Creek Near Syracuse Mar 92 
* Platte River, Hansen-Chris Lakes, Bellevue Feb 92 
* Platte River, Brady Feb 95 
* Elm Creek, Decatur Apr 95 
* R.B. West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern Mar 92 
* Nebraska City South Table Creek Aug 94 
* Wiggle Creek, Homer Jul 95 
South Ekhorn River, near Ewing, NE Apr 95 
* Elk Creek, Jackson Jul 95 
* South Creek, Martinburg Apr 92 
* Elk Creek, Willis Jul 95 
Columbus Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus Aug 95 
* Shell Creek, County Road Near Columbus Mar 92 
* Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder Jun 95 
* Elm Creek, Burt County Apr 95 
* Redbird Creek, O'Neill Sep 93 
* Salt Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, Lincoln Jan 92 
* Platte River, Camp Ashland Sep 95 
* West Branch Papillion Creek, Omaha, NE May 95 
* Niobrara River, Bassett, NE Jul 95 
* Niobrara River-Camrs Bridge, Bassett, NE Sep 95 
* Elkhorn River Bridge, Norfolk Jul 95 
* West Branch Papillion Creek, Omaha Aug 92 
* Logan Creek, Near Bancroft Mar 92 
* Platte River, Near North Bend Apr 92 
* Platte River, Ginger Cove Near Valley Sep 92 
* Elkhorn River, Near Beemer Mar 92 
* Elkhom River, Ewing, Holt County Sep 91 
Lodgepole Creek, Sidney, NE Sep 94 
Pebble Creek, Scribner Sep 92 
* East Bow Creek, Wynot Jun 93 
Nine Mile Drain, Scotts Bluff County Sep 93 
* Plum Creek, Johnstown Sep 93 
Cedar River, Spalding Nov 95 
Ames Diking District near Ames Sep 94 
26-35

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 
TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 22 of Text) 
Location Month Inspected 
Iowa 
Council Bluffs, Missouri River Nov 95 
Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek Aug 95 
Sioux City, Floyd River Aug 95 
Hawarden, Dry Creek Aug 95 
Hamburg L575, Nishnabotna River Jun 95 
Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 95 
Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 95 
Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River Jul 95 
* West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern Jun 95 
* West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Hastings Mar 92 
* East Nisbnabotna River, Page County Bridge, Near Essex May 95 
* Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City Sep 92 
* West Nisbnabotna River, Near Hancock Jan 92 
* East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold Jan 92 
East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak Jun 95 
Big Sioux River, Sioux City Jul 93 
* Mucky Creek, Mapleton, IA Sep 95 
Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County Aug 95 
* East Fork of Boyer River, Near Vail Feb 92 
Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County Sep 95 
* Little Sioux River, Anthon Jul 95 
* Big Sioux River, Plymouth County Jun 93 
* Keg Creek, Minden Feb 92 
* Waterman Creek, Near Sutherland Mar 92 
* Soldier River, Near Ute Sep 95 
* West Nishnabotna River, Near Oakland Jan 92 
Missouri River Levees 
L624 & L627, Mosquito Creek & Sieck Levees Nov 95 
L601, Watkins Levee District Sep 95 
L601, Miller-Sturgeon Levee District Sep 95 
L601, Missouri River Levee District #1 Sep 95 
L594, Waubansie Drainage District Aug 95 
L594, Pleasant Valley Levee District Aug 95 
L575, Benton-Washington Levee District Mar 95 
L575, Northwest Atchison Levee District Nov 95 
L575, McMssock Island Levee District Nov95 
L575, Bucbannan Levee District Nov 95 
L561, L550, L536, Atchison County Levee District Sep 95 
L611-614, & P Missouri River Levee District Apr 95 
R613, Papio Natural Resources District Nov 95 
R562, Peru Levee District Nov 95 
R548, Brownville-Nemaha Levee District Sep 95 
R548, Little Nemaha Levee District Sep 95 
R520, Richardson Co. Levee Dist. #8 Sep 95 
R573, Otoe County Drainage Dist. #2 Sep 95 
R616, Sarpy County Papio Natural Resources District Nov 95 
26-36

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
TABLE 26-K (See Section 35 of Text) 
Federal Cost Totals By 
Item Fiscal Year 95 Subtotal and Category 
SURVEYS (Category 100) 
Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) 
Antelope Creek, Lincoln, NE 132,780 
Big Sioux River, Sioux Falls, SD 2,428 
Thurman to Hamburg, IA - 16,267 
Wood River, Grand Island, NE 1,962 
Lower Platte River and Tribs., NE 153,396 
Ft. Collins, CO 267 
Flood Plain Management Assessment 336,000 
Burt-Washington Counties, NE 818 
Subtotal 611,384 
Special Studies (140) 
Big Bend Wildlife Restoration, SD 3,517 
James River Environmental, SD 4,215 
Oahe Wildlife Restoration, SD 5,220 
Lewis & Clark, NE & Lake Sakakawea, ND 60,270 
Environmental Service Partner 3,746 
Subtotal 76,968 
Review of Authorized Projects (160) 
Oahe Dam to Lake Sharpe, SD 153,541 
Subtotal 153,541 
Miscellaneous Activities (170) 
Special Investigations (171) 185,917 
FERC Licensing(172) 207 
Interagency Water Resources Development(173) 33,697 
North American Waterfowl Management Plan(176) 8,058 
Subtotal 227,879 
Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) 
Cooperation With Other Water Resources Agencies (181) 27,247 
Cooperation with States (186) 213,099 
Subtotal 240,345 
100) TOTAL (Category -1--,-3--10,118 
TOTAL (Category 100) 1,310,118 
26-37

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
TABLE 26-K (Continued) (See Section 35 of Text) 
Federal Cost Totals By 
Item Fiscal Year 95 Categories 
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) 
Flood Plain Management Services (250) 50,010 
SS - Simons Creek, NE 8 
SS - Snyder, CO 25 
Newcastle, WY (250) 2,318 
NFPC (250) 5,032 
Quick Responses (250) 9,970 
Indian Workshops (250) 6,996 
SS - Yankton, SD (250) 5,199 
SS - Bottineau, ND (250) 24,954 
White Earth, ND (250) 6,491 
Technical Services, General (250) 77,771 
Hydrologic Studies (260) 94,161 
SS - White River, Crawford, NE 8 
SS - Columbus, NE 2 
SS - Lincoln, CO., SD (250) 22,254 
SS - Denison, IA 7 
SS - Shell Creek, Platte Co., NE (250) 31,811 
SS - Stevens Creek, Lincoln, NE (250) 748 
SS - Dry Creek, CO (250) 12,091 
TOTAL (Category 200) 356,593 
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) 
None 
PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - 
PROJECTS NOT FULLY AUTHORIZED (Category 400) 
Wood River, Grand Island, NE (451) 254,272 
Big Sioux River, Sioux Falls, SD (451) 555,812 
Watertown and Vicinity, SD (451) 34,666 
TOTAL (Category 400) 844,750 
PLANNING AND ENGINEERING UNDER PROPOSED 
LEGISLATION (Category 500) None 
PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - 
FULLY AUTHORIZED PROJECTS (Category 600) 
None 
TOTAL (Category 600) 
GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 2,511,461 
26-38

OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 
FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
TABLE 26-L (See Section 24 of Text) 
Fiscal Year 95 
Project Name Stage Cost 
Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies 
Disaster Preparedness (100) - 344,511 
Emergency Operations (200) - 27,119 
Rehabilitation (300) - 15,986 
Total (FCCE) 486,616 
Section 205: 
Deadman's Run, NE R 25,205 
Lodgepole Creek, Sidney, NE C 129,293 
Logan Creek, Pender, NE F 46,931 
Lost Creek at Columbus, NE L 935 
Maple Creek East Fork, Howells, NE C 320,483 
Milk River, Malta, MT P 147,492 
Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA F 59,448 
Oak Creek at Wakpala, SD F 72,409 
Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE C 135,041 
Pipestone Creek at Pipestone, MN R 98,256 
Rock River at Rock Rapids, IA R 25,395 
Salt Creek, Levees, Lincoln, NE F 16,030 
Van Bibber Creek, Arvada, CO F 3,679 
Aberdeen & Vicinity, SD P 32,957 
Platte River, Cedar Creek, NE F -523 
West Nishnabotna River, Aroca, IA R 79,613 
Total (Section 205's) 1,264,516 
Section 14: 
Badger Creek, Glacier City, MT C -886 
Dearborn River, Lewis-Clark County, MT C 530 
East Nishnabotna River, Page County Brdg, IA C -1,322 
Four-Mile Creek, Cass County, NE C 9,034 
Muddy Creek, Cascade, Vaughn, MT C -744 
Teton River, Hwy Bridge 89, Chateau, MT C -529 
Teton River, Hwy Bridge 223, Chateau, MT F 5,642 
Tongue River, WY C -592 
West Nishnobotna River, Oakland, IA F 1,494 
Total (Section 14's) 12,623 
Total Flood Control Activities 1,277,139 
L = Litigation 
R = Recon 
P = Plans & Specs 
C = Construction 
F = Feasibility 
- = Does Not Apply 
26-39

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 26-M PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT 
Modifications of projects for the purpose of improving 
the quality of the environment in the public interest. 
(Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, as amended.) 
Fiscal Year 95 Fiscal Year 95 
Study/Project and Location Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended 
Bullard Bend Chute Restoration, NE 31 
California Bend, NE 89,229 
Hidden Lake Restoration, NE 98,266 
Lower Decatur Bend, NE 273 
Missouri River Dike Lowering, NE 672 
Boyer Chute, NE 64,388 9,377 
Missouri River Levee Unit L536 
Deroin Bend, MO 70,857 
26-40

1995 
KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT *
The district comprises a portion of southwestern Iowa; 
northwestern, central, and western Missouri; northern 
Kansas; southern Nebraska; and a portion of northeastern 
Colorado embraced in drainage basin of the Missouri 
River and tributaries from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth. 
Report on navigation project for section of Missouri River 
from Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebraska, is in report of 
Omaha District. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to 
Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth)................27-2 
2. Missouri River Fish and Wildlife 
Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, and MO ............. 27-2 
Flood Control 
3. Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO ........ 27-2 
4. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO ............. 27-3 
5. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS ........... 27-3 
6. Harlan County Lake, Republican 
River, NE .............................. 27-3 
7. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS ........... 27-3 
8. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS ........ 274 
9. Little Blue River Lakes, MO ............... 27-4 
10. Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton 
River, M O ........................... . .27-4 
11. Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes 
(Osage) River, KS ........................ 27-5 
12. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS .......... 27-5 
13. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, 
KS, and MO (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) ............ 27-5 
14. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS ............. 27-5 
15. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program 
(Kansas City Dist.) ...................... .27-6 
16. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre 
River, MO .............................. 27-6 
17. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile 
Creek, KS .............................. 27-6 
18. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA ........... 27-6 
19. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO ...... 27-6 
20. Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS ....... 27-7 
21. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS .............. 27-7 
22. Scheduling of Flood Control 
Reservoir Operations ...................... 27-7 
23. Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects .......................... 27-7 
Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power Page 
24. Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, 
Osage River, MO ........................ 27-7 
25. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO .............. 27-8 
Work Under Special Authorities 
26. Continuing Authorities Program ............. 27-8 
27. Emergency Response Activities .............. 27-9 
General Investigations 
28. General Investigations .................... 27-9 
Other Activities 
29. Regulatory Program......................27-9 
30. National Emergency Preparedness .......... 27-10 
Tables 
Table 27-A Cost & Financial Statement .......... 27-11 
Table 27-B Authorizing Legislation ............. 27-14 
Table 27-C Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects .......................... 27-17 
Table 27-D Not Applicable 
Table 27-E Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects ........................ .27-18 
Table 27-F Not Applicable 
Table 27-G Deauthorized Projects .............. 27-19 
Table 27-H'Missouri River Levee System ......... 27-21 
Table 27-I Kansas City District Projects 
Included in Pick-Sloan Missouri 
Basin Program.....................27-22 
Table 27-J Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects....................27-22 
Table 27-K Work Under Special Authorities 
Continuing Authorities Program ...... 27-23 
Emergency Response Activities ....... 27-24 
Table 27-L Active General Investigations ......... 27-25 
Table 27-M Regulatory Program ............... 27-26 
27-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Navigation 
1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, 
TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) 
Location. Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers conjoin 
at Three Forks, Montana, to form the Missouri River, 
which flows southeasterly 2,315 miles (1960 mileage) across 
or along seven states to the Mississippi River, 
17 miles above St. Louis. For description see page 1149, 
Annual Report for 1932. The river is commercially navigable 
from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, a distance of 732 
miles. The portion of project in Kansas City District 
extends from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, a distance 
of 498 miles. 
Previous Projects. For details see page 1891 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and pages 1153 and 1175 of 
Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing Project. A channel of 9-foot depth and width 
not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, construction 
of permeable dikes to contract and stabilize the 
waterways, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor 
channels, removal of snags, and dredging as required. The 
improved reach within the Kansas City District extends from 
the mouth to Rulo, Nebraska, a distance of 498.4 miles. The 
Bank Stabilization and Navigation features of the project 
were completed in September 1980. For the reach from Rulo, 
Nebraska, to the mouth, the total construction cost was 
$237,942,190 including $8,665,594 for previous project. River 
access sites have been completed at 11 locations. Ordinary 
and extreme stage fluctuations are 16 and 38 feet, 
respectively. 
Local cooperation. Cooperation from benefited localities 
may be required where any improvement may confer special 
benefit. The receipt of contributions from private parties are 
to be expended along with Government funds upon authorized 
work where such work would be in the interest of navigation, 
as authorized by 1915 Rivers and Harbors Act. 
Secretary of the Army approved general principle of cooperative 
construction on Missouri River below Kansas City on 
basis that 25 percent of cost of any special installation shall 
be paid by the United States and 75 percent by local interests. 
Tbtal contributed by local interests in cooperation with the 
United States from 1918 to June 30, 1964, was $675,663, of 
which $8,647 was returned to contributors. Local interests 
must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with 
provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. 
Local interests have contributed $171,816 for cost sharing on 
construction of recreation in addition to constructing portions 
of the facilities. 
Terminal facilities. A listing of terminal facilities 
are included in Missouri River Navigation Charts and can 
be obtained from Kansas City District Engineer for a small 
fee. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance of the 1993 
flood damage to the dikes and revetments was the principle 
item of work accomplished by contract. Field hired labor 
accomplished construction of environmental gaps and emergency 
structure repair of dikes and revetments. District personnel 
also accomplished other work items: channel 
reconnaissance, stream gauging condition studies, surveys 
and mapping, engineering and design, surveys and layouts 
of construction, and supervision and administration. Project 
tonnage on the river for CY 1995 is estimated at 1.5 million 
tons, excluding sand, gravel, and waterway improvement 
materials. District estimates the recreation use on the 
Missouri River (MRK) at 1.2 million recreation days annually. 
2. MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND 
WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, 
KS, and MO 
Location. This project extends along the Missouri River 
from Sioux City, Iowa, to the Mouth near St. Louis, a river 
distance of 732 miles. This location is coincident with the 
Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project on the river. 
Existing project. The project is to mitigate losses of fish 
and wildlife habitat resulting from construction and 
operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation 
Project. The four major components of the plan are 
restoration of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands 
(2,500 acres), preservation of aquatic habitat on public and 
non-public lands subject to the effects of riverbed degradation 
(700 acres), acquisition and development of existing undeveloped 
habitat on private lands (28,000 acres), and development 
of terrestrial wildlife habitat on existing undeveloped 
public lands (16,900 acres). Estimated fully funded cost of the 
project (1995) is $75,700,000, all Federal. Both the Kansas 
City and Omaha Districts are involved in the implementation 
of the project, with Kansas City District involvement directed 
mainly to sites in Kansas and Missouri. 
Local cooperation. There is no non-Federal sponsor 
for the project. The states of Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and Missouri 
are voluntarily serving on a coordinating team which 
is actively involved in ongoing project activities. 
Operations during fiscal year. Funding was continued 
for land acquisition and construction of mitigation features. 
Land was purchased at the following sites: Hamburg Bend, 
Langdon Bend, Kansas Bend, Tbacco Island, Middle Decatur 
Bend, Nebraska; Auldon Bar, Copeland Bend, and Nottleman 
Island, Iowa; and Lower Hamburg, Berger Bend and Overton 
Bottoms, Missouri. Construction activities took place at 
Hamburg Bend, Nebraska, and Benedictine Bottoms, 
Kansas. Construction was completed at Louisville Bend, 
Iowa. Design activities were also carried out at Hamburg 
Bend, Nebraska; Winnebago Bend, and California Bend, 
Iowa; Blackbird-Tieville-Decatur, Iowa and Nebraska; 
Benedictine Bottoms, Kansas; and Weldon Spring, Missouri. 
Flood Control 
3. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, 
KANSAS CITY, MO 
Location. Along the Blue River and tributaries in Jackson 
County, Missouri. 
Existing project. Preliminary plans consist of 12.5 miles 
of improved channel along the Blue River within Kansas City, 
Missouri. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the 
project (1995) is $194,000,000, and estimated non-Federal 
cost of lands, damages and relocations is $32,000,000. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
June 22, 1936 applies. The City of Kansas City, Missouri, 
passed a resolution of intent on December 9, 1975 to 
27-2

KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 
provide the required assurances of local cooperation when 
requested. The Section 221 agreement was signed by the 
Kansas City District Engineer on September 8, 1983. 
Operations during fiscal yeah Preconstruction planning 
is complete and final designs are underway. The first and 
second channel contracts, the pile stabilization, contaminated 
sediments, and the paved reach contracts are complete. Railroad 
relocations are completed in the reach of Stages 1 and 
2. Plans and specifications for the 12th-19th Streets contract 
are complete, and construction has been initiated. Preparation 
of plans and specifications for the 19th Street to Stadium 
Drive and Stadium Drive to Brush Creek contracts have been 
initiated. The railroad relocation contracts with the Kansas 
City Southern, the Missouri Pacific, and the Burlington 
Northern Railroad Companies have been awarded. Construction 
of the Kansas City Southern Railroad Bridge has 
been initiated. 
4. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO 
Location. A major tributary of the Blue River in Kansas 
City, Missouri, and Johnson County, Kansas, draining a 
highly urbanized 29-square-mile area in the two states. 
Existing project. The authorized project consists of 
improving about 7,500 feet of the channel from near Roanoke 
Parkway downstream to near Troost Avenue in Kansas City. 
At the request of the sponsor, Kansas City, Missouri, a modified 
project will be built which provides identical flood protection, 
but which also accommodates park and recreation 
development in the authorized reach. Estimated fully funded 
Federal cost of the modified project (1994) is $14,464,000; and 
estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, relocations, and 
cash is $19,526,000. 
Local cooperation. The City of Kansas City and the Corps 
of Engineers entered into a Local Cooperation Agreement 
(LCA) on the project in March 1991. 
Operations during fiscal year. The Stage 2 contract, 
which will complete all remaining structural features, was 
awarded and notice to proceed issued in November 1992. This 
contract is essentially complete with only landscaping 
remaining. Procurement of equipment for the Flood Warning 
System is complete. All city bridges have been completed 
and are open to traffic. 
The project is scheduled to be turned over to the local 
sponsor in FY 1996. The dedication of the project was in 
June 1995. 
5. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA 
RIVER, KS 
Location. Damsite is on Wakarusa River about 4 miles 
southwest of Lawrence, in Douglas County, Kansas. The lake 
extends into Shawnee and Osage Counties, Kansas. 
Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,250 feet long 
constructed to a height of about 114 feet with an uncontrolled 
spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 
397,200 acre-feet (258,300 for flood control, 28,500 for sediment 
reserve, and 110,400 of multipurpose storage for 
municipal and industrial waste supply and recreation). 
Cost of constructing the completed project was $57,415,433. 
Construction was initiated in January 1972, and the project 
was placed in operation in November 1977. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement in the estimated 
amount of $6,768,000 is required for water supply storage in 
accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was 
signed by the State on September 6, 1978 and was approved 
by the Secretary of the Army on October 30, 1978. Utilization 
of storage was initiated in December 1979. Repayment 
also began at that time. 
Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1995 
was 7,180,000 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted 
of ordinary operation and maintenance. 
6. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, 
REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE 
Location. Dam is on main stem of Republican River about 
235 miles above confluence of stream with Smoky Hill River. 
Site is in Harlan County, 11/2 miles south of Republican City 
and 13 miles west of Franklin, Nebraska. 
Existing project. An earthfill dam about 107 feet above 
streambed with a total length of 11,827 feet, including agatecontrolled, 
concrete, gravity-type spillway section near the 
center of dam. Reservoir provides storage capacity of 850,000 
acre-feet (500,000 for flood control and 350,000 for irrigation 
and sedimentation allowance). Initial cost of constructing the 
project was $45,279,532. Total Federal cost of project, including 
$1,017,623 for major rehabilitation work and $1,832,394 
supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is 
$48,129,549. Construction of the project was initiated in 
August 1946. The project was placed in operation in 
December 1952. Major rehabilitation work was completed 
in FY 1968. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, 
applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1995 
was 7,379,800 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted 
of ordinary operation and maintenance. 
Study of future operation. The Study of Future Operation 
at Harlan County Lake was delayed in FY 1995 pending 
receipt of Bureau of Reclamation's basin-wide hydrology 
and revised Harlan County Lake analyses. The purpose ofthe 
study is to develop an operating plan to serve the best public 
interest for Harlan County Lake under depleted inflow 
conditions. 
7. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL 
CREEK, KS 
Location. The project is located approximately 12 miles 
above the mouth of Big Bull Creek, a tributary of the Marais 
des Cygnes River and about 2/2 miles west of Hillsdale, in 
Miami County, Kansas. 
Existing project. An earthfill embankment about 11,600 
feet long (including approximately 3,300 feet of dike section) 
about 75 feet above rising valley flood plain. The spillway is 
gravity type uncontrolled and the outlet works are controlled. 
The total reservoir storage capacity is 160,000 acre-feet 
(81,000 for flood control, 11,000 for sediment reserve, and 
27-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
68,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality 
control, and recreation). Construction was initiated in 
December 1974, and the project was placed in operation in 
October 1981. Federal cost of construction was $64,161,400. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act 1938, 
applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of 
$21,145,338 for water supply storage in accordance with 
Water Supply Act of 1958. The Kansas Water Resources Board 
signed a contract in January 1974, approved by the Secretary 
of the Army in April 1974, for the entire 53,000 acre-feet of 
water supply storage. The Kansas Department of Wildlife and 
Parks has a 50-year lease on 12,880 acres for management 
of land and water areas for public park, recreational, and fish 
and wildlife purposes. 
Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1995 
was 577,500 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted 
of ordinary operation and maintenance. 
8. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY 
HILL RIVER, KS 
Location. The dam is on the Smoky Hill River about 184 
river miles above the mouth of the stream, and about 11 miles 
northwest of Marquette, Kansas. 
Existing project. An earthfill dam about 131 feet above 
streambed, having a total length of 15,360 feet, including 
4,070 feet of dike section on the left abutment and 2,550 feet 
of dike section on right abutment. The reservoir provides 
storage capacity of 450,000 acre-feet, (400,000 for flood control 
and 50,000 for recreation and streamflow regulation). 
Outlet works and spillway are in right abutment. Initial cost 
of constructing the project was $12,327,735. Total Federal cost 
of project, including $249,492, supplemental recreational 
development (Code 710), was $12,577,227. Construction was 
initiated in June 1940, and project was placed in operation 
in May 1948. 
,.Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, 
applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1995 
was 1,962,200 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted 
of ordinary operation and maintenance. 
9. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO 
Location. This project consists of two lakes in Jackson 
County, Missouri, located in Kansas City, Missouri, and 
suburban communities. The Blue Springs Lake site is on the 
East Fork of the Little Blue River about /2 mile south of U.S. 
Highway 40, and the Longview Lake site is on the main stem 
at approximately 109th Street. 
Existing project. The Blue Springs dam is an earthfill 
embankment about 2,500 feet long and rising about 78 feet 
above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway 
and uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage 
capacity is 26,600 acre-feet (15,700 for flood control, 10,600 
for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 
300 for sedimentation). 
The Longview dam is an earthfill embankment about 1,900 
feet long and rising about 120 feet above the streambed, with 
an uncontrolled service spillway and an uncontrolled outlet 
conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 46,900 acrefeet 
(24,300 for flood control and 20,600 for multipurpose 
storage for water quality and recreation, and 2,000 for 
sedimentation). Federal cost (1992) for both lakes through construction 
of the project was $140,809,200. Construction was 
initiated in September 1977, and the project became operational 
in September 1988. 
Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 
June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must share in separable 
cost allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal 
Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Jackson County 
Legislature approved a recreation cost-sharing contract on 
July 5, 1974 which was approved by the Secretary of the Army 
on June 24, 1976. A supplemental agreement, signed by Jackson 
County officials on June 5, 1978, and approved by the 
Secretary of the Army January 10, 1979, revised the existing 
contract to include additional costs involved in raising the 
multipurpose pool elevation at the Blue Springs Lake. Reimbursement 
for recreation was $15,047,000 of which $450,000 
was accomplished during construction by local interests. 
Operations during fiscal year. Project is complete. Land 
acquisition is complete. Visitation for FY 1995 was 4,189,500 
visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary 
operation and maintenance. 
10. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE 
CHARITON RIVER, MO 
Location. The damsite is on the East Fork Little Chariton 
River in north-central Missouri about 2 miles west of 
Macon in Macon County. 
Existing project. An earthfill dam about 3,800 feet long 
and about 71 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet conduit 
and an uncontrolled service spillway in the right abutment. 
Total reservoir storage capacity is 65,000 acre-feet (29,000 for 
flood control, 4,000 for sediment reserve, and 32,000 of multipurpose 
storage for water supply, water quality control, fish 
and wildlife, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1995) 
is $20,170,000, and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,517,000. 
Construction was initiated in March 1973. The project was 
placed in useful operation for flood control on September 
1, 1980. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement 
of $5,567,000 for water supply storage in accordance 
with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost 
of $3,589,000 allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal 
Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. On September 15, 
1972 the Secretary of the Army approved a contract signed 
by the City of Macon, Missouri, for water supply and recreation 
development. Missouri state agencies indicated their 
intent to sponsor future water supply and signed a contract 
on June 17, 1977 to sponsor recreational development in lieu 
of the City of Macon. After review by the Office of the Secretary 
of the Army, the state signed the contract in December 
1979, and it was approved by the Secretary of the Army on 
April 18, 1980. Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to this contract 
was approved December 28, 1993 and will provide for 
additional recreational facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1995 
was 1,654,100 visitor hours. Project is 100 percent complete 
on scheduled work. The remaining unscheduled work is 
27-4

KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 
construction of recreation facilities. Maintenance: Activities 
consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and design 
of additional recreational facilities to be constructed with 
cost-share funds. 
11. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES 
CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS 
Location. Damsite is on Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River 
in Osage County, Kansas, about 4 miles west of Melvern, 
Kansas. 
Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,700 feet long 
and about 98 feet high with an uncontrolled chute-type spillway 
in the left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 
363,000 acre-feet (200,000 for flood control, 26,000 for sediment 
reserve, and 137,000 of multipurpose storage for water 
quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed 
project was $37,436,530. Construction was initiated in 
July 1967, and the project was placed in operation in August 
1972. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 
applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1995 
was 6,079,900 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted 
of ordinary operation and maintenance and repair of 
1995 flood damaged recreation facilities. 
12. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN 
RIVER, KS 
Location. The damsite is on the Republican River near the 
village of Alida about 10 miles above confluence of Republican 
and Smoky Hill Rivers which form Kansas River; and 
about 4 miles northwest of Junction City, Kansas. 
Existing project. An earthfill dam about 6,300 feet long 
and 126 feet high with an uncontrolled service-chute spillway 
in a saddle on right abutment. Total reservoir storage 
capacity is 1,160,000 acre-feet (700,000 for flood control, 
160,000 for sediment reserve and 300,000 of multipurpose 
storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). 
Water supply storage is included in the project at the 
request of the Governor of Kansas under provisions of the Federal 
Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the 
completed project was $48,268,843. Total Federal cost of 
project, including $1,297,649 supplemental recreational 
development (Code 710), was $49,566,492. Construction was 
initiated in July 1961. The project was placed in operation 
in June 1965. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 
applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of 
$12,162,134 for water supply storage in accordance with 
Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage for water supply 
was initiated in October 1984. Reimbursement was 
initiated, at the option of the State, in September 1976. 
Operations during fiscal year. The lake project 
experienced record flooding during 1993 that required large 
flood releases through the outlet works and several days of 
uncontrolled flows over the spillway. Design for repairs to the 
damaged outlet channel and spillway was continued with 
Emergency Supplemental funds. Visitation for FY 1995 was 
5,626,500 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included 
ordinary operation and maintenance and repair of 1993 
and 1995 flood damaged recreation facilities. 
13. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE 
SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO 
(RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) 
Location. On both banks of the Missouri River from Sioux 
City, Iowa, about 760 miles to the mouth near St. Louis, 
Missouri. The portion of the project in Kansas City District 
extends from Rulo, Nebraska, 498 miles to mouth. 
Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant 
works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, 
Iowa, to the mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and 
small communities against floods. Estimated fully funded 
cost (1995) for the active portion of the project from Rulo, 
Nebraska, to mouth is $129,684,000, including $88,759,000 
Federal and $29,613,000 non-Federal contributions. Costs of 
$11,312,000 for lands and damages are to be borne by local 
interests. Remaining portion of project consists of units on 
which planning and construction are being delayed pending 
completion of restudy to assure that additional levee construction 
is economically justified. Current cost estimate for 
deferred, inactive, and deauthorized portion of project Rulo, 
Nebraska, to mouth is $255,259,000 (1964, 1986, and 1987 
price levels), of which $231,233,000 is Federal cost for construction 
and $24,026,000 for lands and damages to be borne 
by local interests. Construction of the project was initiated in 
June 1948. 
Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 
applies. Fully complied with for all completed units and units 
under construction. Local sponsors provide all operation and 
maintenance. 
Operations during fiscal year. Status of individual units 
of active portion of project at end of fiscal year is shown in 
Table 27-H on Missouri River Levee System. Unit L385 was 
approved for construction in FY 1994, and planning on 
Unit L142 continued. 
14. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE 
RIVER, KS 
Location. The damsite is on the Delaware River about 5 
miles above the mouth in Jefferson County, and about 3 miles 
northwest of Perry, Kansas. 
Existing project. An earthfill dam about 7,750 feet long 
constructed to an elevation about 95 feet above valley floor 
with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled spillway in left 
abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 770,000 acrefeet 
(480,000 for flood control, including 140,000 for sediment 
reserve and 150,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, 
water quality control, and recreation). Water supply 
storage is included in the project plan at the request of the 
State of Kansas under provisions of the Federal Water Supply 
Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed 
project was $48,371,706. Total Federal cost of project, including 
$724,212 supplemental recreational development 
(Code 710), is $49,095,918. Construction was initiated in 
March 1964, and the project was placed in operation in 
January 1969. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 
applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of 
$9,208,342 for water supply storage in accordance with Water 
Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been 
initiated. Reimbursement was initiated at the option of the 
State in September 1978. 
27-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1995 
was 6,355,000 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included 
ordinary operation and maintenance and repair of 1993 
and 1995 flood damaged recreation facilities. 
15. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN 
PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) 
Location. Flood control improvements included in this 
project are on and along the Missouri River and several of its 
principle tributaries, in states comprising the Missouri River 
Basin. 
Existing project. The Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program 
for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin 
provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, 
Iowa, and the mouth, flood-protection works at certain municipalities, 
and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and 
on tributaries for control of flooding. (See Table 27-B for 
authorizing legislation and Table 27-I on Kansas City District 
projects included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program.) 
See individual project reports. 
16. POMME DE TERRE LAKE 
POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO 
Location. The dam is on the main stem Pomme de Terre 
River, about 44 miles above the mouth in Hickory County, 
Missouri. The lake extends upstream into Polk County, 
Missouri. The site is about 4 miles south of Hermitage, 
Missouri, and 20 miles north of Bolivar, Missouri. 
Existing project. An earth and rockfill dam about 4,630 
feet long constructed to about 155 feet above riverbed and a 
dike section on left abutment about 2,790 feet long, providing 
storage capacity of 650,000 acre-feet (407,000 for flood control 
and 243,000 for sedimentation and multi-purpose). Initial 
cost of constructing the completed project was $14,946,784. 
Total Federal cost of project, including $329,140 area 
redevelopment and $2,089,529 supplemental recreational 
development (Code 710), is $17,365,453. Construction was 
initiated in January 1957, and the project was placed in useful 
operation in October 1961. 
Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1995 
was 11,918,700 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted 
of ordinary operation and maintenance. 
17. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED 
TEN MILE CREEK, KS 
Location. The dam is on One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, a 
tributary of Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, 7 miles above 
mouth of stream in Osage County, Kansas, about 8 miles 
northwest of Pomona, Kansas, and 34 miles upstream from 
Ottawa, Kansas. 
Existing project. An earthfill dam 7,750 feet long constructed 
to an average height of about 85 feet above 
streambed, with gated-outlet works and an ungated chutetype 
spillway near left abutment. Total reservoir storage 
capacity is 230,000 acre-feet (160,000 for flood control, 14,000 
for sediment reserve, and 56,000 of multipurpose storage for 
water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing 
the completed project was $13,272,108. Total Federal cost 
of project, including $731,130 supplemental recreational 
development (Code 710), was $14,003,238. Construction 
began in July 1959, and the project was placed in operation 
in October 1963. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 
applies. Pomona has water supply reimbursement under 
Water Supply Act of 1958 totaling $862,923. 
Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1995 
was 3,695,900 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted 
of ordinary operation and maintenance and repair 
of 1995 flood damaged recreation facilities. 
18. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON 
RIVER, IA 
Location. The damsite is on the Chariton River about 7 
miles north of Centerville and 1 mile north of Rathbun, 
Appanoose County, Iowa. 
Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long constructed 
to an elevation about 86 feet above valley floor, with 
gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled service chute with 
paved sill spillway about a mile upstream from left abutment. 
Total reservoir storage capacity is 552,000 acre-feet (339,000 
for flood control, 24,000 for sediment reserve and 189,000 of 
multipurpose storage for navigation, water quality control, 
and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the project was 
$27,033,210. Total Federal cost of project, including $588,948 
supplemental recreation development (Code 710), was 
$27,622,158. Construction of the project was initiated in September 
1964 and completed in November 1969. The operating 
plan for this project was revised to reduce flood control 
releases during critical times of the year to allow local farmers 
better access during planting and harvesting and to facilitate 
field drainage and drying out. The revised plan has resulted 
in more frequent high pool elevations than anticipated, which 
has inundated roads and recreation facilities. A shoreline erosion 
study was accomplished; and a supplement to the master 
plan was approved, which resulted in relocation of recreation 
facilities and bank stabilization work to compensate for the 
higher lake levels. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 
applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1995 
was 5,696,900 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included 
ordinary operation and maintenance, acquisition 
of emergency rock stockpile, and construction of stabilization 
ponds. 
19. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE 
PLATTE RIVER, MO 
Location. The damsite is on the Little Platte River about 
1 mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of 
Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. 
Existing project. Earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long and 
95 feet high with an uncontrolled service spillway. A dike 
about 2,400 feet long crosses a saddle in the left abutment. 
Total reservoir storage capacity is 246,500 acre-feet (92,000 
for flood control, 52,300 for sediment reserve, and 102,200 of 
multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, 
and recreation). Cost of constructing the project was 
$87,685,314. Construction was initiated in November 1973, 
and the project was placed in operation in March 1982. 
27-6

KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement of $24,000,000 will 
be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water 
Supply Act of 1958, and reimbursement of $7,500,000 will 
be required for recreation development in accordance with 
Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Additional non- 
Federal contribution for recreation amounts to $737,000. All 
contracts for local cooperation were approved by the Secretary 
of the Army on November 27, 1972. 
Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1995 
was 6,516,300 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities 
consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and renovation 
of relief wells. 
20. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, 
BIG BLUE RIVER, KS 
Location. The dam is on the main stem of the Big Blue 
River, about 12 miles above the stream mouth in Riley and 
Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas. Site is about 5 miles north 
of Manhattan, Kansas. 
Existing project. An earth and rock dam 7,500 feet long 
and 157 feet high. Total reservoir storage capacity is 2,346,000 
acre-feet (1,933,000 for flood control, 228,000 for sediment 
reserve and 185,000 for multipurpose storage, for low-flow 
regulation, navigation, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing 
the completed project was $80,051,031. Total Federal 
cost of project, including $533,048 supplemental 
recreational development (Code 710), was $80,584,079. Construction 
began in October 1952. Project was placed in operation 
in July 1962. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 
applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Tuttle Creek Lake 
experienced record flooding in 1993 at the same time as 
Milford Lake. Prolonged flows (for the first time in the project's 
history) through the spillway produced a new project visitor 
attraction, the Tuttle Creek "Grand Canyon." An analysis of 
damages to the spillway area was continued with Emergency 
Supplemental funds. Visitation for FY 1995 was 2,345,600 
visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary 
operation and maintenance. 
21. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS 
Location. The dam is on the Saline River about 130 miles 
above its mouth, near the eastern edge of Russell County, 
Kansas, about 50 miles west of Salina, 10 miles north of Wilson, 
and 20 miles east of Russell, Kansas. 
Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,600 feet long 
and 160 feet high with a gated-outlet works, chute spillway, 
storage capacity is 776,000 acre-feet (511,000 for flood control, 
40,000 for sediment reserve and 225,000 multipurpose 
storage for irrigation, navigation, and low-flow regulation). 
Initial cost of constructing the project was $20,015,023. Total 
Federal cost of project, including $448,344 supplemental 
recreational development (Code 710), was $20,463,367. Construction 
began in April 1961, and the project was placed in 
operation in December 1964. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, 
applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1995 
was 2,554,000 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activity included 
ordinary operation and maintenance. 
22. SCHEDULING OF FLOOD CONTROL 
RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 
Under sections 7 and 9, 1944 Flood Control Act, the Corps 
is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations concerning 
storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control 
in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well 
as those constructed by the Corps. 
23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, P.L. 738, and subsequent 
acts require local interests to furnish assurances that 
they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects 
after completion in accordance with regulations 
prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers 
are responsible for administration of these regulations within 
boundaries of their respective district. (See Table 27-J on 
inspection of completed flood control projects.) 
Multiple Purpose Projects 
Including Power 
24. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND 
RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO 
Location. The damsite is on the main stem of the Osage 
River about 1.5 miles northwest of Warsaw, Benton County, 
Missouri. Reservoir extends into Bates, Henry, Hickory, St. 
Clair, and Vernon Counties, Missouri. 
Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,000 feet long 
constructed to an average height of about 96 feet above 
streambed, including a gate-controlled overfall spillway and 
a power installation consisting of six inclined pumpgenerating 
units with a combined generating capability of 
160,000 kilowatts. Total reservoir storage capacity is 
5,202,000 acre-feet (3,918,000 for flood control, 244,000 for 
sediment reserve, and 1,040,000 multipurpose storage for 
power, low-flow regulation, and recreation). Public Law 91- 
267, approved May 26, 1970, authorized a change in project 
name from Kaysinger Bluff Dam and Reservoir, Osage River 
Basin, Missouri, to the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir. 
Estimated cost (1995) through construction of the project is 
$550,910,000. Construction of relocated Missouri Highway 
M-13 was initiated September 1964 and completed 
May 1966. Construction of the dam and reservoir was 
initiated in October 1964. The embankment has been completed 
including the paved roadway on top of the dam. The 
spillway was completed in October 1979. The Southwestern 
Power Administration powerline needed for final testing and 
commercial operation of the generators was completed in 
December 1979. The first power unit was placed on line 
27-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
on December 22, 1979. Subsequent problems with the 
turbine bearings required remedial design on the bearings. 
Restricted commercial power production began in April 1982. 
Through September 1995, power generation totaled 
4,102,055,000 kilowatt hours. Of the gross income from the 
sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, 
$90,686,684 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project 
power operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 
applies. 
Operation during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1995 was 
12,469,900 visitor hours. Work was continued on real estate 
activities and construction of powerplant features. Project is 
99 percent complete. During FY 1995, 254,732,000 kilowatt-
hours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance 
activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance, 
replacement of bridge crane controls, and replacement of 
powerplant sewage treatment plant with lagoon. 
25. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO 
Location. The damsite is on the Sac River about 49.5 miles 
above its confluence with the Osage River, and about 1 mile 
east of Stockton, Cedar County, Missouri. The lake extends 
into Dade and Polk Counties. 
Existing project. A rock-shell dam with impervious core 
about 5,100 feet long constructed to an average height of 
about 128 feet, with a gated overfall spillway and a 45,200- 
kilowatt power installation. Total reservoir storage capacity 
is 1,674,000 acre-feet (774,000 for flood control, 25,000 for sediment 
reserve and 875,000 multipurpose storage for power and 
recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project 
was $75,715,300. Cost of the project, including $3,758,000 for 
downstream channel work and $502,057 for supplemental 
recreational development (Code 710), was $79,975,357. Construction 
was initiated in October 1963, and the project was 
placed in operation in December 1969. Power operation problems 
were encountered with the initial operation in March 
1973 because the downstream channel did not have the capacity 
which earlier observations and computations indicated. 
As a result, it has been necessary to restrict the power operation 
to about the 30,000 kilowatt level. Right-of-way for construction 
of a channel cutoff and bridge at Horseshoe Bend 
were acquired, and construction completed. Sloughing easements 
downstream to Caplinger Mills were acquired. Completion 
assured downstream channel capacity to Caplinger 
Mills of 8,000 c.f.s. for powerplant operation. Discharge in this 
range will accommodate power operations at a 39,500- 
kilowatt level. Through September 1995, power generation 
totaled 1,465,120,000 kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income 
from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, 
$27,423,589 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for 
project operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, 
applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1995 
was 8,580,200 visitor hours. The project is complete and in 
operational status. During FY 1995, 96,757,000 kilowatthours 
of electrical power were generated. Maintenance: 
Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance, 
initiation of cavitation inlay, and upgrade of Orleans Trail 
Access Road. 
WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES 
26. CONTINUING AUTHORITIES 
Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized 
by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, 
Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30,1948, as amended). 
Each project selected must be complete in itself, economically 
and environmentally justified, and limited to a Federal 
cost of not more than $5 million. The local sponsoring agency 
must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the 
Army, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including highway, 
highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations; 
hold and save the Department of the Army free from 
damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; 
assume all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit; and 
prevent future encroachments on improved channels. 
The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 requires the 
non-Federal sponsors of Section 205 projects to pay 50 percent 
of the cost of the feasibility study. For structural flood control 
projects, the sponsor must pay in cash during the construction 
at least 5 percent of the construction cost. The sponsor's 
cash and other contributions must equal 25 percent of the 
total construction cost, but will not be required to exceed 50 
percent. 
There were no Section 205 projects under construction 
in Fiscal Year 1995. 
See Table K for expenditures under Section 205 during 
Fiscal Year 1995. 
Emergency Streambank Protection (Section 14,1946 
Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 
1946) as amended. 
Each project selected must be complete in itself, engineering 
feasible, economically justifiable, environmentally acceptable, 
and limited to a Federal statutory cost of not more than 
$500,000. The local sponsoring entity must agree to provide 
without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, 
and rights-of-way, including highway, highway bridge, 
and utility relocations and alterations required for project construction; 
provide over the period of construction, an amount 
equal to not less than 25 percent or more than 50 percent of 
total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; operate, 
maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project 
upon completion; hold and save the Department of the Army 
free from damages arising from the construction, operation, 
and maintenance of the completed project; and assume all 
project costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limit. 
Construction was completed in September 1994 on Hinkson 
Creek, Columbia, MO, Sewerline. Project was completed 
financially in FY 1995. 
No Section 14 projects completed construction during FY 
1995. 
See Thble 27-K for Emergency Streambank Protection 
expenditures during FY 1995. 
Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 
(Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986, Public Law 662, 99th Cong., November 17,1986). 
Section 1135 authorizes review of the operation of completed 
water resources projects to determine need for modifications 
for the purpose of improving environmental quality. 
No projects were completed in FY 1995. 
See Table 27-K for Section 1135 studies status and expenditures 
for FY 1995. 
27-8

KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 
27. EMERGENCY RESPONSE 
ACTIVITIES 
A. Disaster Preparedness Program. The Disaster Preparedness 
Program (DPP) involves planning, training, inspection, 
supplies and equipment, and personnel. Planning 
activities involve development of district response and recovery 
plans in support of natural disasters. During the 1995 
flood event, the district again implemented CEMRK OPLAN 
500-1-1. This plan was developed to support our levee rehabilitation 
program. This plan supplements our other current 
plans including the district's Response Plan, Emergency 
Operations Center Plan, Emergency Operations and Disaster 
Assistance-Deployment Plan, as well as our district Corrective 
Action Plan. 
Training activities to support disaster preparedness 
included both internal district employee training on maintaining 
our flood fighting expertise and the Corps' role under 
the Federal Response Plan, as well as training and conferences 
with state and local officials. During this fiscal year we 
conducted in-house district training in preparation for potential 
flood fighting efforts during the spring 1996. We also conducted 
flood fight training with state and local officials and 
levee sponsors from Nebraska, Iowa, Missouri, and Kansas. 
Additional training was provided to the Levee Survey Inspections 
Teams during 1995. 
In addition to flood fight training at the field level, Emergency 
Operations Center (EOC) training for the district personnel 
who would be mobilized during activation of the EOC 
for disaster response was conducted during the second quarter 
of FY 95. Among the training topics covered were responsibilities 
of the Duty Officer, procedures and duties of the in/outprocessing 
teams and financial management teams. 
Disaster preparedness includes maintaining the necessary 
supplies and equipment to support disaster response. To support 
flood fighting preparedness efforts, we provided technical 
assistance to the state and local officials and maintained 
an inventory of over 1.5 million sandbags and over 40 flood 
fighting pumps. 
B. Public Law 84-99. 
Rehabilitation of Flood Control Works. Flooding 
occurred along the Missouri River from 8 May to 15 July 1995 
as a result of severe thunderstorms that began in early May. 
The EOC was activated on 8 May and operated on extended 
hours until early July. During the course of this event, the 
Kansas City District issued 753,000 sandbags, loaned 37 flood 
pumps and provided technical assistance to levee sponsors, 
both Federal and non-Federal units. Approximately $1.5 million 
of Flood Control and Coastal Emergency funds (FC&CE) 
were expended during the flood event. P.L. 84-99 rehabilitation 
assistance was requested to repair damage resulting from 
the 1995 flooding at 7 Federal and 50 non-Federal levee units. 
Of 57 requests for assistance, 7 levee units were determined 
to be ineligible for P.L. 84-99 assistance due to poor benefitto-
cost ratios or minor damage. The remaining 50 projects 
(6 Federal and 44 non-Federal) are being repaired. 
The 1995 flood also caused damage to 12 Kansas City District 
lake projects. High water levels at the projects caused 
$1.5 million in damage to roads, riprap, beaches, shorelines, 
and sanitary facilities. Priority repairs have been completed. 
Remaining items will be accomplished as funds become 
available. 
The Missouri River Bank Stabilization project was also 
damaged by the 1995 flood. High river levels since the flood 
have prevented a detailed analysis of the damage, so an estimate 
of the repair costs for the bank stabilization and navigation 
structures is unavailable at this time. Additional 
Operation and Maintenance, General funds to repair the 
damage will be required over the next several years. 
Emergency Operations. Once again, the weather proved 
to be an excellent instructor, as well as tester of our Disaster 
Response Plan and training. Severe flooding occurred along 
the Missouri River from 8 May to 15 July 1995. Flood fighting 
costs for this event were approximately $1.5 million. Many 
of the newly repaired and larger levee projects still under construction 
along the Missouri River sustained extensive 
damage resultant of this flood event. During FY 95 additional 
FC&CE funds of slightly more than $6.6 million were 
received to accomplish investigation and repair of levees 
damaged by the spring 95 flood on the Missouri River. The 
1995 rehabilitation effort is more thoroughly described in 
paragraph B. 
TDY Support. Resultant of the 1995 flood event 22 persons 
from other Corps districts and from the Bureau of Reclamation, 
were brought into the district to supplement the levee 
rehabilitation effort. Funds in the amount of $350,000 were 
available to pay for those services. 
FEMA Missions. Following the Oklahoma City bombing, 
this district's Systems to Locate Survivors (STOLS) team was 
deployed to Oklahoma to assist with recovery efforts. This was 
the first mission assignment the team had received since their 
formulation in 1993. 
See Table 27-K for listing by category of Emergency 
Response Activities expenditures during FY 1995. Fiscal year 
expenditures for Disaster Preparedness Program - Inspections, 
previously shown on Table 27-A, are included in Table 
27-K under Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies. 
General Investigations 
28. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
Fiscal year 1995 costs totaled $1,607,050 for all General 
Investigations activities. See Table 27-L which covers Surveys, 
Collection and Study of Basic Data. There were no Preconstruction 
Engineering and Design expenditures in 
FY 1995. 
Other Activities 
29. REGULATORY PROGRAM 
Statutes. The Corps of Engineers is charged with protecting 
the public interest in all waters of the United States, 
including wetlands. This is accomplished through a Department 
of the Army permit program pursuant to � 10 of the 
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and � 404 of the Clean 
Water Act. 
Operations during Fiscal Year 1995. Kansas City District 
completed 1,871 permit actions during the year. Of 56 
violations reported and evaluated, 46 were resolved by permits 
or voluntary restoration. Special projects or emphases 
during the year included Endangered Species Consultation 
27-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
affecting 6 gravel excavators and 17 watershed proposals 
(6-200 structures in each watershed) in Kansas; issuance 
of a Regional General Permit for gravel excavation in 
Missouri; evaluation and issuance of 3 permits for structures 
associated with casino gambling on the Missouri 
River; a public hearing on Kansas River dredging proposals; 
and substantial coordination on the highly controversial 
South Lawrence Trafficway in Kansas and the Page Avenue 
proposal in Missouri. Fiscal year 1995 costs totaled 
$2,531,415 for all regulatory activities. See Table M which 
shows expenditures for Permit Evaluation, Enforcement, 
Studies, and Other Navigation Regulations. 
30. NATIONAL EMERGENCY 
PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM 
FY 1995 expenditures of $182,000 provided for activities 
required for Mobilization Preparedness, Continuity of 
Government Preparedness, and Emergency Water Planning. 
27-10

KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
i FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 
Total Cost to 
n Text Project Funding Sept. 30, 1995 
1. Missouri River, New Work: 
Sioux City, IA Approp. 
to Mouth (Rubo, Cost 
NE, to Mouth) Maint. 
(Federal Funds) Approp. 
Cost 
Contributed Funds New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Consolidated New Work: 
Summary Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
2. Missouri River Fish New Work: 
& Wildlife Mitigation, Approp. 
IA, NE, KS & MO Cost 
3. Blue River Channel New Work: 
Kansas City, MO Approp. 
(Federal Funds) Cost 
Contributed Funds New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Consolidated New Work: 
Summary Approp. 
Cost 
4. Brush Creek, New Work: 
Kansas City, MO Approp. 
(Federal Funds) Cost 
Contributed Funds New Work: 
Authorized Project Approp. 
Cost 
Expanded Project" New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Consolidated New Work: 
Summary Approp. 
Cost 
5. Clinton Lake, New Work: 
Wakarusa Approp. 
River, KS Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
6. Harlan County New Work: 
Lake, Republican Approp. 
River, NE Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
7. Hillsdale Lake, New Work: 
Big Bull Approp. 
Creek, KS Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
27-11 
TABLE 27-A 
See 
Section 
- - - - 237,942,190' 
- - - - 237,942,1901 
4,355,000 4,121,000 9,891,000 5,491,000 317,278,7742 3 
4,355,000 2,648,025 10,419,287 5,185,248 316,028,3342 4 
- - - - 816,190 
- - - - 816,190 
- - - - 22,642 
- - - - 22,642 
- - - - 238,758,380' 
- - - - 238,758,380' 
4,355,000 4,121,000 9,891,00 5,491,000 317,301,4162 : 
4,355,000 2,648,025 10,419,287 5,185,248 316,050,9762 4 
572,000 4,140,000 1,159,000 4,991,000 11,304,000 
580,300 2,285,844 2,894,174 3,082,885 9,274,457 
14,703,000 4,711,000 4,155,000 2,807,000 74,622,171 
14,703,356 4,295,997 1,446,862 1,772,387 70,463,419 
- 339,750 - 330,891 703,041 
12,381 116,105 121,085 32,887 302,458^ 
14,703,000 5,050,750 4,155,000 3,137,891 75,325,212 
14,715,737 4,412,102 1,567,947 1,805,274 70,765,877" 
1,078,000 4,100,000 4,480,000 1,711,000 14,264,000 
1,077,856 4,095,991 4,016,538 2,150,100 14,235,443 
- 1,000,000 - - 1,342,000 
328,936 124,923 684,077 5,655 1,155,312 
2,867,000 -1,000,000 1,350,000 - 6,662,000 
536,721 1,150,344 3,350,444 704,522 5,872,8316 
3,945,000 4,100,000 5,830,000 1,711,000 22,268,000 
1,943,513 5,371,258 8,051,059 2,860,277 21,263,586 
- - -- 57,415,433 
- - - - 57,415,433 
1,342,000 1,401,000 1,347,400 1,409,000 19,878,000 
1,374,063 1,401,000 1,347,400 1,397,900 19,866,900 
- - - - 47,111,926 
- - - - 47,111,9268 
1,810,000 1,474,000 1,423,300 1,534,000 29,576,984 
1,810,000 1,474,000 1,377,918 1,563,550 29,561,152 
- - - - 1,017,623 
- - - - 1,017,623 
- - - - 64,161,400 
- - - - 64,161,400 
1,310,500 702,000 628,000 730,000 9,486,870 
1,310,500 688,071 641,929 730,000 9,486,870

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept. 30, 1995 
8. Kanopolis Lake, 
Smoky Hill 
River, KS 
9. Little Blue River 
Lakes, Little Blue 
River, MO 
10. Long Branch Lake 
Little Chariton 
River, MO 
Contributed 
Funds 
Consolidated 
Summary 
11. Melvern Lake 
Osage (Marais des 
Cygnes) River, KS 
12. Milford Lake, 
Republican River, 
KS 
13. Missouri River 
Levee System 
IA, NE, KS 
and MO 
14. Perry Lake, 
Delaware River, KS 
16. Pomme de Terre 
Lake, Pomme de 
Terre River, MO 
17. Pomona Lake, One 
Hundred Ten Mile 
Creek, KS 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
1,239,300 1,248,000 1,612,4003 1,189,700 
1,206,465 1,263,445 1,587,801 1,214,524 
-26,000 
88,066 
793,000 836,000 
793,000 836,000 
623,000 602,000 
623,000 602,000 
- 18,655 
- 18,655 
739,000 755,000 
739,000 749,555 
859,000 778,000 
720,321 910,044 
- 31,380 
- 41,905 
- 31,380 
- 41,905 
1,682,000 1,780,000 1,495,100 1,782,000 
1,582,000 1,873,400 1,482,197 1,799,057 
1,517,800 1,771,000 2,363,500' 1,983,000 
1,517,800 1,747,547 1,939,775' 2,318,324 
1,270,000 1,639,000 
1,260,993 1,526,995 
275,000 421,000 
291,109 308,814 
2,178,000 1,495,000 1,493,170 1,792,000 
1,789,990 1,829,124 1,513,056 1,823,555 
1,710,000 1,502,000 1,602,360 2,227,000 
1,684,494 1,522,059 1,561,307 2,273,500 
1,540,000 1,513,000 1,523,1503 2,127,500 
1,542,407 1,498,975 1,509,7514 2,153,924 
12,577,227 
12,577,227" 
28,580,3123 
28,563,147 
140,809,200 
140,809,200 '" 
6,590,784 
6,585,339 
18,216,177 
18,216,177 
8,857,112 
8,850,477 
1,139,455 
1,093,277" 
19,355,632 
19,309,454 
37,436,530 
37.436,530 
24,788,154 
24,785,708 
49,566,492 
49,566,492 
31,794,440' 
31,682,586' 
64,965,851 
64,748,478 
49,095,918 
49,095,918 
32,663,343 
32,660,898 
17,365,452 
17,365,452 
30,589,461 
30,589,461 
14,003,238 
14,003,238 
26,845,070' 
26,844,0704 
27-12

KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 
TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept. 30, 1995 
18. Rathbun Lake, 
Chariton River, 
IA 
19. Smithville Lake, 
Little Platte 
River, MO 
20. Tuttle Creek Lake 
Blg Blue 
River. KS 
21. Wilson Lake. 
Saline River, 
KS 
22. Scheduling Flood 
Control Reservoir 
Operations 
23. Inspection of 
Completed Flood 
Control Projects 
24. Harry S. Truman 
Dam & Reservoir 
Osage River, MO 
25. Stockton Lake. 
Sac River, MO 
30. National Emergency- 
Preparedness 
Program 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
1,923,000 2,386,000 5,306,000; 2,369,000 
1,923,000 2,354,982 4,787,486' 2,825,988 
983,000 952,000 
950,500 984,500 
984,000' 1,171,400 
951,051 1,204,270 
1,527,000 1,774,000 1,866,000 1,813,800 
1,527,000 1,761,517 1,662,050 1,912,339 
2,034,000 1,907,000 1,490,500; 1,507,600 
1,838,084 1,714,621 1,867,355 1,518,460 
242,000 255,000 
242,000 255,000 
427,000 456,000 
427,000 456,000 
2,526,000 3,268,000 
2,724,080 1,928,058 
247,000 266,000 
247,000 266,000 
397,000 531,000 
397,000 531,000 
27,622,159 
27,622,159 
35,793,7113 
35,701,1674 
87,685,314 
87,685,314 
14,106,848; 
14,106,7694 
80,584,079 
80,584,079 
33,118,232; 
33,000,338 
20,463,367 
20,463,367 
25,346,604; 
25,346,0243 
56,014,452 
56,014,452 
7,495,431 
7,495,431 
300,000 2,900,000 550,909,900 
1,485,853 2,350,806 550,196,458 
7,810,800 7,987,000 9,236,000 8,027,000 
7,464,704 7,884,859 9,572,781 8,039,973 
3,666,800 3,593,000 3,336,488 3,545,000 
3,639,973 2,598,785 3,818,636 4,063,067 
223,200 182,000 
223,200 182,000 
182,000 182,000 
182,000 182,000 
92,363,162 
92,258,559 
79,975,357 
79,975,357 
48,649,159 
48,628,159 
3,349,850 
3,349,850 
1. Includes $8,665,595 costs of new work for previous project. 
2. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project. 
3. Includes funds appropriated under FY 1993 Emergency 
Flood Supplemental Appropriation, 963/73123: Missouri River, 
Rulo, NE to Mouth, $2,199,000; Kanopolis Lake, KS, $-30,300; Long 
Branch Lake, MO, $16,000; Milford Lake, KS, $308,000; Pomona 
Lake, KS, $-3,500; Tuttle Creek Lake, KS, $175,800; Wilson Lake, 
KS, $-2,400; and Smithville Lake, MO, $-9,600. 
4. Includes funds expended under FY 1993 Emergency Flood 
Supplemental Appropriation, 963/73123: Missouri River, Rulo, NE 
to Mouth, $1,893,248; Kanopolis Lake, KS, $689; Long Branch Lake, 
MO, $15,401: Milford Lake, KS, $618,391; Pomona Lake, KS, $-254; 
Tuttle Creek Lake, KS, $302,892; Wilson Lake, KS, $-40; and Smithville 
Lake, MO, $23,270. 
5. Excludes $35,296 non-Federal contribution not required for 
authorized Blue River Channel project (Blue River Channel Mobay 
Chemical 1984-1987). 
6. Corps is building Brush Creek Expanded Project requested 
by sponsor, City of Kansas City, MO, with all costs of betterments 
and enhancements not required by Authorized Project funded 
by sponsor. Excludes sponsor's contributions of $2,196,646 during 
Preconstruction Engineering and Design; $2,109,429 for Park Features 
Design; $1,185,202 for Water Polution Control during construction; 
and $1,359,866 for Public Works Department. 
7. Excludes $118,805 non-Federal contribution not required 
for authorized Clinton Lake project (1973-1979). 
8. Excludes cost of materials furnished Harlan County project 
without charge in the amount of $24,198. 
9. Excludes cost of materials furnished Kanopolis Lake project 
without charge in the amount of $7,885. 
10. Excludes $2,732,554 thru FY 1990 non-Federal contributions 
not required for authorized Little Blue River Lakes project. 
11. Corrected total. Excludes $42,149 interest during 
construction at Long Branch Lake project, and $500,000 workin-
kind. 
27-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 27-B 
See Section 
in Text 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Date of 
Act Project and Work Authorized 
Jul. 25, 1912 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Mar. 3, 1925 
Jan. 12, 1927 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Dec. 31, 1970 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 28, 1990 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Jun. 28, 1938 
Aug. 18, 1941 
Dec. 22, 1944 
MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO 
MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) 
Project adopted for securing a permanent navigable 
channel of 6-foot depth from Kansas City, MO to 
mouth. 
Fixed upstream limit of improvement at upper end of 
Quindaro Bend (374.8 miles from mouth) and provided 
for dredging. 
For a mimimum width of 200 feet and depth of 6 feet. 
with a reasonable additional width around bends, 
mouth to upper end of Quindaro Bend, Kansas City, 
MO. 
Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 
6-foot channel depth between Kansas City, MO. 
Quindaro bend, and Sioux City. IA. 
Appropriation of $15 million additional authorized: 
additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 were 
made by Public Works Administration under 
provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 
1933. and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of 
Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. 
Completion of improvement from mouth to Sioux City. 
IA. 
Securing a navigable channel of 9-foot depth and a 
minimum width of 300 feet. 
MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE 
MITIGATION MO, KS, IA, & NE 
Project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses 
Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation 
Project, MO, KS. IA. & NE: April 24, 1984. Report 
of Chief of Engineers, authorized at estimated cost 
of $51,900,000. 
BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO 
Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized 
$40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. 
BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO 
Project for flood control on Brush Creek, a tributary 
of the Blue Rive;r, Kansas City, MO, authorized at 
estimated total cost of $16,100,000. 
Modified to authorize the Secretary of the A:rmy to 
construct the project substantially in accordance 
with the Post Authorization Change Report, dated 
April 1989 (revised January 1990), at a total cost of 
$26,200,000. 
CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS 
The project for the Kansas Rivelr, KS, NE, and CO is 
authorized at an estimated cost of $88,070,000. 
HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN 
RIVER, NE 
Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation 
and partial accomplishment. 
Modified general comprehensive plan to include 
Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican 
River, NE, other supplemental flood control works 
on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million 
additional expenditure. 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 
expenditure. 
H. Doc. 1287, 61st Cong., 
(contains latest published 
map). P.L. 241-62. 
H. Doc. 463, 64th Cong., 
(contains latest published 
map). 
P.L. 585-68. 
H. Doc. 1120. 60th Cong.. 
P.L. 560-70. 
P.L. 67-73 
H.R.11781 
P.L. 520-71 
H. Doc. 238. 73d Cong.. icontains 
latest published 
map.. PL. 409-73 
H. Doc. 214. 76th Cong., 
icontains latest published 
map. P.L. 14-79. 
Title VI. Section 6011a . 
Water Resources D)evelopment 
Act of 1986. P.L. 
99-662. 
H. Doc. 91-332. 91st Cong. 
Sec. 401a). Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986. 
P.L. 99-662 
Water Resources I)evelopment 
Act of 1990. 
PL. 101-640. 
1962 Flood Control Act 
S. Doc 122, H. Doc. 578, 
87th Cong., P.L. 87-874. 
Flood Control Committee 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
P.L. 761. 
H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 
77-228. 
H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 
191 and 247, 78th Cong., 
PL. 534. 
27-14 
Documents 
2. 
3.

KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 
TABLE 27-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Section Date of 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Jun. 28. 1938 
Aug. 18. 1941 
)ec. 22. 1944 
\ug. 13. 1968 
(ct. 27. 1965 
Sep :. 1954 
Sep. 3. 19541 
Aug. l. 1941 
l)ec. 22. 1944 
St)p. 3. 1954 
Jun. 28. 1938 
Aug. 18. 1941 
Dec. 22. 1944 
Jul. 24, 1946 
HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS 
The comprehensive plan for the Missouri River Basin, 
approved by the Act of June 28, 1938, and as 
amended and supplemented is further modified to include 
the project for flood protection on the Kansas 
River and tributaries. It is further modified to include 
the project for flood protection on the Osage 
River and tributaries. 
KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS 
Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation 
and partial accomplishment. 
Modified general comprehensive plan to include 
Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican 
River, NE, other supplemental flood control works 
on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million 
additional expenditure. 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 
expenditure. 
LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO 
Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general 
comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 
LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON 
RIVER, MO 
The project fbor flood protection on the Chariton and 
Little Chariton Rivers and tributaries, IA and MO, 
is authorized at an estimated cost of $9,167,000. 
MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES 
(OSAGE) RIVER, KS 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $217.710.000 additional 
expenditure. 
MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $217.710,000 additional 
expenditure. 
MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, 
KS, AND MO 
Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City to 
Kansas City. 
Extended project from Kansas City to the mouth and 
provided fbr increased protection. 
PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional 
expenditure. 
PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM 
(KANSAS CITY DIST.) 
Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $9 million for 
initiation and partial accomplishment. 
Modified general comprehensive plan to include 
Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican 
River, NE, other supplemental flood control works 
on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million 
additional expenditure. 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 
expenditure. 
Additional expenditure of $150 million for prosecution 
of general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin. 
P.L. 780, 83rd Cong., 
H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong. 
Flood Control Committee 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
P.L. 761. 
H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; 
P.L. 77-228. 
H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 
191 and 247, 78th Cong.. 
P.L. 534. 
P.L. 90-483 (H. Doc. 169, 
90th Cong. 
1965 Flood Control Act, 
P.L. 89-298, (H. Doc. 238, 
89th Cong. 
H. Docs. 642, 549'. and 
561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 
H. Doc. 549'. 83rd Cong., 
P.L. 780 
H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. 
H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 
191 and 247, 78th Cong. 
H. Docs. 642, 549'. and 
561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. 
Flood Control Committee 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong. 
H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; 
P.L. 77-228 
H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 
191 and 247, 78th Cong. 
27-15 
10 
12 
I 1 
15.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 27-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Section Date of 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
May 17, 1950 
Sep. 3, 1954 
May 2, 1956 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Dec. 30, 1963 
Jun. 18, 1965 
May 12, 1967 
Aug. 13, 1968 
Dec. 24, 1970 
Dec. 23, 1971 
Mar. 7, 1974 
Jun. 28, 1938 
Dec. 22, 1944 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Additional expenditure of $250 million for prosecution 
of general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin. 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional 
expenditure. 
Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin by deletion of construction of Red 
Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of 
construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 
expenditure. 
Additional expenditure of $207 million for 
prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin. 
Additional expenditure of $80 million for prosecution 
of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin 
and modified plan to include bank protection or 
rectification works below Garrison Dam. 
Additional $116 million for prosecution on general 
comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 
Additional $20 million for prosecution of general 
comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 
Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general 
comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 
Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan 
Missouri River Basin program. 
Additional $101,000,000 for prosecution of general 
comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri 
Basin Program. 
Additional $72,000,000 for prosecution of general 
comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri 
Basin Program. 
POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE 
TERRE RIVER, MO 
Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation 
and partial accomplishment. 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 
expenditure. 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $217,000,000 additional 
expenditure. 
POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE 
CREEK, KS 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional 
expenditure. 
RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA 
Expanded general comprehenssive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional 
expenditure. 
SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE 
RIVER, MO 
The project for flood protection on the Platte River 
and tributaries, MO and IA, is authorized at an 
estimated cost of $26,889,000. 
H. Docs. 642 and 5491, 
83rd Cong. 
H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. 
S. Doc. 91-1100. 91st Cong. 
S. Doc. 92-222. 92nd Cong. 
Flood Control Committee 
Doc. 1. 75th Cong.. 
P.L. 761. 
H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 
191 and 247. 78th Cong.. 
P.L. 534. 
HI. Docs. 642, 549'. and 
561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. 
H. Doc. 549'. 561, 83rd 
Cong., P.L. 780. 
H. Doc. 561, 83rd Cong., 
P.L. 780. 
1965 Flood Control Act, 
P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 262, 
89th Cong.) 
27-16 
16. 
17. 
18. 
19.

KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 
TABLE 27-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Date of 
Act Project and Work Authorized 
Jun. 28, 1938 
Aug. 18. 1941 
Dec. 22, 1944 
Dec. 22. 1944 
.Jul. 14. 1960 
Sep. 3. 1954 
Oct. 2:3. 1962 
Sep. :3. 195-1 
20. 
TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS 
Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiatiion 
and partial accomplishment. 
Modified general comprehensive plan to include 
Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican 
River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on 
upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million 
additional expenditure. 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 
expenditure. 
WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 
expenditure. 
Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution 
of general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin. 
HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, 
OSAGE RIVER, MO 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional 
expenditure. 
The Kaysinger Bluff Reservoir is hereby modified in 
accordance with recommendations of the Chief of Engineers 
in H. Doc. 578. 87th Cong., at an estimated 
additional cost of $43,245,000; provided, that nothing 
in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the acquisition 
of additional lands for the establishment of 
a national wildlife refuge at the reservoir. 
STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO 
Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri 
River Basin and authorized $217.710.000 additional 
expenditure. 
H. Doc. 549'. 83rd Cong.. 
P.L. 780. 
I ( oains latest pullished maps of Miss(ouri Rive'r. 
TABLE 27-C OTHER AUTHORIZE 
2. Report of Chief of Engineers on justification of Wilson 
Dam and Reservoir, submitted in compliance with Public Law 
505, 84th Congress, published as Senate Document 96, 86th Congress, 
was approved July 14, 1960 (Public Law 645). 
:D NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Fort Leavenwvorth Bridge removal Complete 1965 270,393 - 
(;asconade River. MO '-' Complete 1931 139,003 85,077 
1. Improvement adequate for existing needs. Project for 
maintenance only. Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th 
CO 11;.. 
2. Inactive portion of project deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990 in 
accordance with Section 1001(bX 1) of Water Resources Development 
Act (WRDA) of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 
27-17 
See Section 
in Text 
Flood Control Committee 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
P.L. 761. 
H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; 
P.L. 77-228. 
H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 
191 & 247, 78th Cong., 
P.L. 534. 
H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 
191 & 247, 78th Cong., 
P.L. 534. 
S. Doc. 96, 86th Cong., 
P.L. 645. 
H. Doc. 549'. 83rd Cong., 
P.L. 780. 
1962 Flood Control Act, 
H. Doc. 578. 87th Cong., 
P.L. 87-874. 
Documents 
21. 
2

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Abilene, KS 
Atchison, KS 
Barnard, KS' 
Bartley, NE 
Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA' 
Big Blue River, Seward, NE' 
Big Stranger Creek, KS' 
Blue River Basin, Overland Park, KS, 
Indian Creek Channel Modification' 
Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO' 
Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO' 
Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act)4 
Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) 
East Muddy Creek, MO' 
Elk Creek, Clyde, KS' 
Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE 
Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS 
Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS 
Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS' 
Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO 
(Downstream Fish and Wildlife Mitigation) 
Indianola, NE 
Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod) 
Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, 
MO and KS 
Lawrence, Kansas River, KS 
Little Blue River Channel Improvement, 
Little Blue River, MO 
Lower Grand River, MO' 
Manhattan, Kansas River, KS 
Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO' 
Missouri River at New Haven, MO 
(Sec 212, 1950 Act) 
Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS 
Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 
Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO" 
Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS 
Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement 
Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery 
Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS 
Seward, NE' 
Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO 
Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., KS' 
Topeka, Kansas River, KS 
Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO:, 
Trimble Wildlife Area, Smithville Lake, MO 
Upper Grand River, MO' 
1. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 
Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 
2. Required non-Federal contributions $129,680. 
3. Grand River Basin reconnaissance study (authorized by 
resolution of Committee on Public Works and Transportation, 
U.S. House of Representatives on July 3, 1987) reviewed and 
updated costs for these projects authorized in the Flood Control 
Act of 1965, and found no economically feasible plan. 
4. Inactive units Little Chariton River (East and Middle 
Fork) and Mussell Fork were deauthorized 1 Jan. 1990 by Section 
1001(bX1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, 
P.L. 99-662. Construction cost includes $481,106 cost of completed 
Shoal Creek Unit and $211,600 cost of deauthorized 
Little Chariton River and Mussell Fork units. 
5. Includes $130,841 non-Federal contributions. 
6. Inactive units Kansas Avenue Bridge and Approach, and 
Lower Argentine Units were deauthorized July 9, 1995 in accordance 
with Section 1001(bX2) of WRDA of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 
Construction cost above includes $67,500 for deauthorized 
Bridge and Approach Unit; does not include $1,181,000 non- 
Federal contributions. 
7. Includes $619,787 non-Federal contributions for work 
desired by local interests, but not required under the project. 
The project as a whole is complete except for Turkey Creek 
facilities in Central Industrial District Unit. 
8. Includes $153,377 non-Federal contributions. 
9. Pattonsburg Lake Highway Relocation and Town 
Relocation portions of the project were deauthorized 1 Jan. 1990 
in accordance with Section 1001(bX1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 
27-18 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Completed 
Completed 
Inactive 
Completed 
Completed 
Inactive 
Completed 
Completed 
Inactive 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Inactive 
Completed 
Inactive 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Inactive 
Completed 
Deferred 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Deferred 
Completed 
Completed 
Inactive 
Completed 
Inactive 
1965 
1973 
1953 
1974 
1994 
1966 
1976 
1977 
1973 
1966 
1984 
1973 
1976 
1966 
1984 
1950 
1984 
1980 
1985 
1989 
1966 
1967 
1976 
1973 
1966 
1976 
1982 
1973 
1975 
1967 
1973 
1972 
1974 
1966 
1990 
1966 
1,099,350 
4,099,590 
127,860 
118,269 
652,414 
126,887 
337,131 
269,2882 
451,400 
692,706 
8,052,990 
989,015 
726,966 
757,500 
1,271,025 
2,782,793 
67,275 
25,010,500 
42,434,197w 
8,773,488 
25,530,083 
2,488,585 
432,245 
139,883 
2,036,624 
4,462,661 
5,315,168 
222,193 
700,000 
3,878,668 
126,887 
6,896 
246,995 
21,174,593 
1,570,000

KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 
TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
Project 
Arlington Lake, MO 
Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE 
Chariton-Little Chariton 
Basin, MO (1965 Act) - 
Inactive Units Little 
Chariton River (East and 
Middle Fork) and Mussell 
Fork Units only' 
DryiFvo rk and East Fork 
Lakes. Fishing River. MO 
Garnett Lake. Pottawatomie 
Creek. KS 
Gasconade River Navigation,. 
MO 
Grove Lake. Soldier Creek. KS 
Hackleman Corners Lake., 
Cedar Creek. MO 
iavs. Big Creek. KS 
Indian Lake. Blue River. KS 
Kansas City. Kansas River, 
KS X62 Mod' - Inactive Units 
Kansas Avenue Bridge 
Approach. and Lower 
\Argentine Units Only 
Kan-as River Navigation 
Marysville. KS 
Mlelvern Lake and Pomona 
Lake Road Improvements' 
KS X1974 Act' 
Merriam. Turkey Creek. KS 
Mill Lake. Blue River. MO 
Mlissour'i Riverl" Levee System. 
IA. KS. MO. and NE 
Deauthorized by Section 1002 
Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986. P.L. 99-662, 
Section 1002: Units R402: 
R393-395: and R414 
Deauthorized in accordance 
with WRDA Section 1001(bx1): 
Units L36: R42; L51; R55-59-61; 
L68-92: R70; L78; R87; L94; 
L99: L103; R104: R107; R112; 
L117; L121; L124; L129; L134; 
L137-139; L145; R150; L154; 
L157; R161; L164; R169; L175; 
R179-184; L191-196; L205; 
L217; R226; R240; R251; 
L256; R259; R263-270; R272; 
R284; R302; R336; L353; L357; 
R361; L362; L392; L419-426; 
L435; R512-513, Section III 
()naga Lake, Vermillion Creek, 
KS 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual 
Report For Date and Authority 
1948 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 
1938, as modified by Flood Control 
Act approved August 18, 1941, and 
expanded by Flood Control Act 
approved December 22, 1944 
1965 Flood Control Act approved 
September 3, 1954 
1977 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 
(H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 
1974 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 
(H. Doc. 281, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 
1973 Flood Control Act approved 
September 3, 1954 
1931 Curtailment of project in H. Doc 467, 
69th Cong. 1928 
1977 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 122, 
87th Cong. 2d sess.) 
- Authorized by Flood Control Act 
approved September 3, 1954 
1974 Flood Control Act of 1965 approved 
October 27, 1965 
1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 
91st Cong., 2d sess.) 
1984 1962 Flood Control Act, S. Doc 122, 
87th Cong., P.L. 87-874 
1980 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, 
Sec. 201 
- Flood Control Act of September 3, 
1954 
-- Water Resources Development Act of 
1974, Section 17 
1970 Flood Control Act approved September 
3, 1954 
1971 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 
91st Cong., 2d sess.) 
- Flood Control Act of August 18, 
1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. 
- Flood Control Act of August 18, 
1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. 
Flood Control Act of 1962, 
October 23, 1962 (P.L. 87-874) 
Contributed 
Funds 
Expended 
Date 
Deauthorized 
27-19 
__ 
Federal 
Funds 
Expended 
$8,651 
16,317 
211,600 
51,989 
71,466 
1,754,019 
499,200 
127,297 
67,500 
259,900 
133,682 
39,708 
57,500 
1,631,700 
2,178,261 
- Aug. 5, 1977 
- May 6, 1981 
- Jan. 1, 1990 
- Jan. 1, 1990 
- Nov. 17, 1986 
- Jan. 1, 1990 
- Nov. 17, 1986 
- Aug. 5, 1977 
- Jan. 18, 1978 
- Nov. 17, 1986 
- Jul. 9, 1995 
- Nov. 17, 1986 
- Jan. 1967 
- Jan. 1, 1990 
- Nov. 27, 1973 
- Nov. 17, 1986 
- Nov. 17, 1986 
- Jan. 1, 1990 
- Nov. 17, 1986

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 27-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
Project 
Osage River Navigation. MO. 
lock and dam 
Pattonsburg Lake, Grand 
River, MO" 
1-35 Highway Relocation 
Town Relocation 
Pioneer Lake, KS 
Pomme de Terre Lake 
(Power Addition), MO 
Richland Lake, MO 
Tomahawk Lake, 
Blue River, KS 
Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (Road 
Improvement - 1974 Mod.) 
Tuttle Creek Lake, KS 
Road and Bridge (1976 Act) 
Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, 
KS 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual 
Report For Date and Authority 
1952 Original lock and dam authorized 
Mar. 3, 1899; improvement autho- 658,076' 
rized in 1928; placed in standby 
status Jul. 1952 and operation and 
maintenance discontinued 
1976 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 393,623 
1976 (H. Doc. 241, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 91,929 
1952 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 95,692 
1938, as modified by Flood Control 
Act of August 18, 1941, and 
expanded by Flood Control Act 
approved December 22, 1944 
1954 Flood Control Act of 1954- 
1974 (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.) 
1948 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 8,548 
1938, as modified by Flood Control 
Act approved August 18, 1941, and 
expanded by Flood Control Act 
approved December 2, 1944 
1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 77,189 
91st Cong., 2d sess.) 
1977 Sec. 18 of Water Resources 3,000 
Development Act of 1974 
- Water Resources Development Act of - 
1976, Section 189, P.L. 94-587 
1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 1,095,020 
91st Cong., 2d sess.) 
Date 
Deauthorized 
- Jan. 1, 1990 
Jan. 1, 1990 
Jan. 1, 1990 
Aug. 5, 1977 
- Nov. 17, 1986 
- Aug. 5, 1977 
- Nov. 17, 1986 
- Nov. 17, 1986 
- Jan. 1, 1990 
- Nov. 17, 1986 
1. For completed Shoal Creek unit of Chariton-Little 
Chariton Basin, MO, see Table 27-E. 
2. For completed project see Table 27-C. Deauthorized under 
Sec. 1001(b)(1) WRDA of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 
3. Hays, Lincoln Draw, KS, Section 205 feasibility study 
terminated in March 1991 due to lack of identifiable project that 
would meet dam safety concerns. 
4. For completed Argentine, Amourdale, and Central Industrial 
Units of project, see Table 27-E. 
5. Operation and maintenance costs $850,495. Deauthorized 
under Sec. 1001(bX1) of WRDA, P.L. 99-662. 
6. Pattonsburg Lake portion of project is inactive. See Table 
27-E. 
27-20 
Federal Contributed 
Funds Funds 
Expended Expended

TABLE 27-H 
KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 
MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM 
(See Section 13 of Text) 
Miles of 
Unit Levee Status 
R512-513 Richardson Co. Drainage Dist #71 19.1 Complete-1958 
R500 Iowa Point Drainage Dist #4 4.1 Complete-1954 
Kimsey Holly Creek 4.4 Complete-1970 
L497 Forest City Levee Dist 16.0 Complete-1962 
L488 Holt Co. Drainage Dist #7 11.5 Complete-1955 
R482 Burr Oak Drainage Dist #3 8.2 Complete-1954 
L476 Amazonia Levee Dist 10.8 Complete- 1956 
R460-471 Elwood-Gladden Levee Dist 13.8 Complete-1968 
L455 S. St. Joseph Levee Dist 15.6 Complete-1967 
L443-448 Halls Levee Dist 17.3 Complete-1957 
R440 Atchison & Doniphan Co. Drainage Dist 10.7 Complete-1959 
L408 Farley-Beverly Drainage Dist 12.2 Complete (Levee raise modification)-1972 
L400 Waldron Levee Dist 7.6 Complete-1957 
R351 Atherton Levee Dist 15.9 Complete-1966 
L246 Brunswick-Dalton Drainage Dist 20.0 Complete-1983 (Restudy initiated Feb 92) 
434.5 Atchison, KS, Railroad Bridge Inactive 
408.2 Leavenworth, KS, Railroad Bridge Inactive 
R331 Inactive 
L330-345 Orrick Levee Dist 43.4 Inactive 
R328 Inactive 
L319-325 Henrietta-Crooked River Drainage Dist 35.0 Inactive 
L100 Inactive 
R30 Inactive 
L15 North County Levee Dist 40.0 Inactive 
L504-512-519 Deferred 
L294 Wakenda Creek Area Deferred 
L385 Riverside-Quindaro Drainage Dist 6.5 Approved for construction start in FY 94 
L142 Jefferson City, MO Reclassified to Active May 91, planning continues 
Remaining units Detailed planning not initiated 
1. Section III of R512-513 was not constructed and was 
deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990. 
27-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 27-I KANSAS CITY DISTRICT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN 
PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM 
(See Section 15 of Text) 
Federal Non-Federal Non-Federal 
Project Status' Cost" Costa Reimbursable4 
Abilene, Smoky Hill River, KS C $1,099,350 $287,000 
Bartley, Republican River, NE C 118,269 9,500 
Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS I 71,186,000 19,314,000 $44,800,00" 
Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS D 71,466 - 
Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE C 48,129,549 - 
Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO C 550,910,000 - 138,385,000" 
Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS C 64,161,400 - 21,145,338 
Indianola, Republican River, NE C 67,275 7,592 
Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS C 12,577,227 - 
Lawrence, Kansas River, KS C 8,620,111 2,130,000 
Manhattan, Kansas River, KS C 2,488,585 265,000 
Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 37,436,530 - 4,460,106 
Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), 
KS (1974 Authorization) D - - 
Milford Lake, Republican River, KS C 49,566,492 - 12,162,134 
Missouri River Levee System, Rulo to the Mouth7 A 88,759,000 40,925,000 
Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 2,036,624 348,300 
Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 4,462,661 876,000 
Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS C 49,095,918 - 8,551,805 
Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO C 17,365,453 - 
Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, KS C 14,003,238 - 862,923 
Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS C 3,878,668 1,960,000 
Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO C 79,975,357 - 24,206,593 
Topeka, Kansas River, KS C 21,174,593 10,383,492 
Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS C 80,584,079 - 2,333,916 
Tuttle Creek Lake, KS-Road and Bridge (1976 Act) D - - 
Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), KS 
(1974 Modification) D 3,000 - 
Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS C 20,463,367 - 
1. Status: A = Active; C = Completed; D = Deauthorized; I = 5. Estimated reimbursement costs allocated to water supply. 
Inactive. 6. Estimated reimbursement costs allocated to power. 
2. Actual appropriations for completed and deauthorized projects; 7. Active portion of project. Currently estimated cost (1995): Deferred 
estimated appropriation requirements for active and inactive projects. portion of project - $46,753,000 Federal and $4,336,000 non-Federal; 
3. Estimated cost during construction. Inactive portion of project - $182,791,000 Federal and $19,690,000 non- 
4. Future reimbursement of initial Federal cost. Federal. Actual cost of deauthorized units (1990) is $1.689,200 Federal. 
8. Includes $22,116,864 estimated reimbursement costs allocated 
to power, and $2,089,729 estimated reimbursement costs allocated to 
water supply. 
TABLE 27-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 23 of Text) 
Location Month Inspected 
Missouri River Main Stem 
Missouri River Levees: R512-513, R500, Kimsey Holly Creek, L497, L488, 
R482, L476, R460-471, L455, L443-448, R440, L408, L400 and R351, L246 
Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas: Argentine, Armourdale, 
Birmingham, CID (Mo & Kans), East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey 
Creek, North Kansas City Units, and GSA Federal Complex 
Osage River, Kansas and Missouri 
Ottawa, Kansas 
Osawatomie, Kansas 
Kansas River and Minor Tributaries 
Topeka, Kansas; Auburndale, North Topeka, Oakland, Soldier 
Creek, South Topeka, and Waterworks Units 
Republican River, Nebraska and Kansas 
Bartley, Nebraska 
Smoky Hill, Saline, and Solomon Rivers 
Abilene, Kansas 
Mar/Sep 95 
Apr/Oct 95 
Sep 95 
May 95 
Apr 95 
Mar/Oct 93 
Apr 95 
27-22

KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 
TABLE 27-K FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES 
WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES 
CONTINUING AUTHORITIES 
(See Section 26 of Text) 
Fiscal Year 
Study Status' Cost 
Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, 
Public Law 858, 80th Congress, June 30, 1948, as Amended 
Cross Creek, Rossville, KS P $1,693 
Mill Creek, Olathe, KS F 60,278 
Mitchell and Pearson Creeks, Waynesville, MO R 79,401 
TOTAL FOR 3 ACTIVE PROJECTS: $141,372 
2 Section 205 studies were terminated in FY 1995, total 5,697 
TOTAL ALL SECTION 205 PROJECTS $147,069 
Emergency Streambank Protection - Sec. 14, 1946 Flood 
Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress 
July 24, 1946, as Amended 
Hinkson Creek, Columbia, MO, Sewerline O $4,401 
Blue River, Gregory Boulevard, Kansas City, MO C 372,610 
Bear Creek, Warrensburg, MO, 24-Inch Sewerline P 1,100 
Delaware River Water Intake, Kickapoo Reservation, KS P 6,528 
Marmaton River, Vernon County, MO P 1,637 
One Hundred Two River, Nodaway County, MO, Hopkins Bridge P 1,854 
Grand River, Chariton County, MO, Salt Creek Bridge D 14,126 
One Hundred Two River, Pickering, MO, Nodaway County Bridge D 6,755 
Osage River, City of Lake Ozark, MO, Sewermain D 22,428 
TOTAL FOR 9 ACTIVE PROJECTS: $431,439 
2 Section 14 studies were terminated in FY 1995, total 4,272 
TOTAL ALL SECTION 14 PROJECTS $435,711 
Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment, 
Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
Public Law 662, 99th Congress, November 17, 1986 
Initial Appraisals, General I $97 
Missouri River Levee System, Unit L246, Chariton County, MO F 13,598 
Milford Lake Habitat Restoration, KS F 20,976 
Rathbun Lake Habitat Restoration, IA F 17,218 
TOTAL ALL SECTION 1135 ACTIVITIES $51,889 
1. Status: R = Recon; F = Feasibility; P = P&S; C = Construction; O = Operational; I = Initial 
D = Planning and Design Analysis 
27-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 27-K 
(Continued) 
FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES 
WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES 
Emergency Response Activities 
(See Section 27 of Text) 
Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, 
and Rescue Work - Public Law 99 
84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation 
Emergency Supplemental 
Approp 96X3125 Approp 963/73125 
Activity FY 95 Expenditure FY 95 Expenditure 
FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES 
Disaster Preparedness Program - 100 
Corps Statutory Activities 
Activities in Support of Others 
Facilities 
Inspections 
Total Disaster Preparedness Program 
Emergency Operations - 200 
Flood Response - 210 
Emergency Operations - Flooding 
Missouri River and Tributaries - July '93 Flood 
Major Sanders - Midwest Flood 
September 1993 Flood 
May 1995 Flood 
Total Emergency Operations 
Rehabilitation - 300 
Rehab Management 95-96 
Federal Flood Control Works 
Non-Federal Flood Control Works 
Field Investigation 
Total Rehabilitation 
FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES 
TOTAL FEDERAL NON-REIMBURSABLE ACTIVITIES 
SPONSOR'S CONTRIBUTED FUNDS 
Maintenance - 300 
Non-Federal Flood Control Works - 320 
River and Harbors 
Contributed Funds 
Approp 96X8862 
Expenditures 
$488,531 
TOTAL ALL EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES EXPENDITURES 
27-24 
$125,772 
100,000 
100,000 
100,000 
$425,772 
$14,389
0 
2,330
0 
447,429 
$464,148 
$0 
2,753,778 
3,250,019 
886,211 
$6,890,008 
$7,779,928 
$0
000 
$0 
$0 
307
0 
15,188 
414,327 
$429,822 
$76,342 
3,935,119 
792,204 
151,015 
$4,954,680 
$5,384,502 
$13,652,961

KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 
TABLE 27-L ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
(See Section 28 of Text) 
Federal Cost Item and CWIS Number Total By FY 95 Category 
SURVEYS (Category 100) 
Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) 
Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO - 12563 $342 
Flood Plan Mgmt/Upper Mississippi- 
Lower Missouri Rivs - 13245 396,000 
Marysville, KS - 12820 4,530 
Turkey Creek Basin, KS & MO - 12381 317,373 
Swope Park Industrial Area, Kansas City, MO - 12821 90,100 
Subtotal $808,345 
Special Studies (140) 
Environmental Services Partnership - 14190 $66 
Review of Authorized Projects (160) 
Kanopolis Lake, KS - 08730 134,036 
MRLS, Units L455 and R460-471 - 13267 224,872 
Subtotal $358,908 
Miscellaneous Activities (170) 
Special Investigations - 17250 $109,078 
Interagency Water Resources Development - 14713 13,422 
North American Waterfowl Mgmt - 53904 9,682 
Subtotal $132,182 
Coordinate Studies with Other Agencies (180) 
Coop Water Resource Agencies (181) - 53907 $51,108 
Cooperation with States (186) 
Indian Workshops - 79901 1,000 
Negotiation Funds, KS - 14800 1,163 
Negotiation Funds, MO - 14880 85 
Planning Assistance to States 
KS State Historical Water Mgmt - 20002 44,976 
MO Perche Creek Water Quality - 29003 2,426 
Planning Assistance to States KS - 14820 2,000 
Planning Assistance to States MO - 14829 2,000 
Subtotal $104,758 
TOTAL (Category 100) $1,404,259 
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) 
Flood Plain Management Services (250) 
Special Studies - Bartley, NE - 83030 $13,189 
Flood Plain Management Service Unit - 82030 35,142 
Indian Workshops - 82075 1,000 
Overland Park, KS - 83020 6,000 
Quick Responses - 82045 6,006 
Special Studies 
Jefferson City, MO - 83015 74 
Paola, KS - 83035 12,000 
Tri-County Levee District - 83025 10,052 
Technical Services, General - 82040 
Subtotal $119,346 
Hydrologic Studies (260) 
General Hydrology Studies - 53820 $83 445 
TOTAL (Category 200) $202,791 
GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,607,050 
27-25

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 27-M REGULATORY PROGRAM 
(See Section 29 of Text) 
Federal Cost 
Item and CWIS Number FY 95 
PERMIT EVALUATION (100) 
REG - Permit Evaluation (FE101) - 08204 
ENFORCEMENT (200) 
REG - Enforcement (FE201) - 08205 
STUDIES (300) 
Playa Lakes - Wetland Study (FE301) - 88890 
Endangered Mussel Survey (FE303 - 88892 
Total Studies 
OTHER NAVIGATION REGULATIONS (400) 
Review Section 402 Applications (FE401) - 08207 
GRAND TOTAL REGULATORY PROGRAM 
$1,766,346 
749,000 
10,000 
-1,931 
8,069 
8,000 
$2,531,415 
27-26

LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS DISTRICT *
The civil works boundary of this District includes an area of 
approximately 36,414 square miles in northern, western, 
and southwestern Arkansas and a portion of Missouri within 
the Arkansas River, Little River, and White River basins. In 
Arkansas River Basin, the District is responsible for those 
areas included in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River 
and its tributaries above and exclusive of Pine Bluff, AR, and 
below the mouth of the Poteau River, near Fort Smith, AR. 
The District has responsibility for planning, design, construction, 
and operation and maintenance of the navigation 
portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation 
System in the State of Arkansas (including that portion 
below Pine Bluff). In Little River Basin, the District is 
responsible for those portions of the drainage basin of the 
Arkansas portion of Little River and its tributaries above its 
mouth near Fulton, AR. In White River Basin, the District 
is responsible for those portions in southern Missouri and 
northern and eastern Arkansas included in the White River 
drainage basin and its tributaries above Peach Orchard 
Bluff, AR. The Memphis District is responsible for navigation 
maintenance on the White River below Newport, AR, to 
the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou, in Arkansas County, AR. 
The White River downstream from the mouth of Wild Goose 
Bayou is part of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation 
System. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigatlon 
1. AR River Basin, AR, OK, and KS........................28-2 
2. Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No.9), AR ....... 28-2 
3. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, AR....28-3 
4. David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No.6), AR ............ 28-3 
5. Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No.4)..............28-3 
6. James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No.13) ........... 28-3 
7. Lock No. 2 and Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No.2), AR ..28-3 
8. Joe Hardin Lock and Dam (No.3), AR ................. 28-3 
9. Lock and Dam No.5, AR ...................................... 28-4 
10. Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine 
Terminals, AR .................................................... 28-4 
11. Murray Lock and Dam (No.7), AR........................28-4 
12. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization......28-4 
13. Norrell Lock and Dam (No.1) and Entrance 
Channel, AR ....................................................... 28-4 
14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................. 28-4 
15. Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No.8), AR ......... 28-4 
Flood Control 
16. Black River Obstruction Removal, 
Butler Co., MO .............................................. 28-5 
17. Blue Mountain Lake, AR......................................28-5 
18. Cato Springs Branch and Town Branch, 
Fayetteville, AR ................................................... 28-5 
19. Clearwater Lake, MO...........................................28-5 
20. Crooked Creek, Harrison, AR ............................... 28-6 
21. DeQueen Lake, AR...............................................28-6 
22. Dierks Lake, AR...................................................28-6 
23. Dry Jordan Creek, Harrison, AR ........................ 28-6 
24. Flood Control Work Under Special 
Authorization ..................................................... 28-7 
25. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR ................. 28-7 
26. Gillham Lake, AR ................................................ 28-7 
27. Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects...................................................28-7 
28. Little River Basin, AR ......................................... 28-7 
29. 
30. 
31. 
32. 
33. 
34. 
Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR .................................. 28-8 
Millwood Lake, AR...............................................28-8 
Nimrod Lake, AR ................................................. 28-8 
Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ 28-8 
White River Basin (Little Rock Dist, AR & MO)...28-8 
White River, Batesville, AR.................................28-9 
Multiple-Purpose Projects Includlng Power 
35. Beaver Lake, AR ................................................ 28-9 
36. Bull Shoals Lake, AR ........................................ 28-10 
37. Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No.10), AR................. 28-10 
38. Greers Ferry Lake, AR......................................... 28-11 
39. Norfork Lake, AR .............................................. 28-11 
40. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No.13), AR ...28-11 
41. Table Rock Lake, MO ...................................... 28-12 
General Investigations 
42. Surveys ........................................................... 28-12 
43. Collection and Study of Basic Data .................. 28-12 
Environmental Restoration (Section 1135) 
44 Nimrod Waterfowl Levee .................................... 28-13 
45. Morgan Point Bendway Closure Structure ........28-13 
Tables 
Table 28-A, Cost and Financial Statement..................28-14 
Table 28-B, Authorizing Legislation............................ 28-19 
Table 28-C, Other Authorized Navigation Projects....... 28-22 
Table 28-E, Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects....................................................28-23 
Table 28-G, Deauthorized Projects............................ 28-24 
Table 28-H, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: 
Navigation ........................................................... 28-25 
Table 28-1, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: 
Lakes.................................................................. 28-29 
Table 28-J, Little River Basin, AR: Lakes.................... 28-30 
Table 28-K, White River Basin, AR & Mo: Lakes......... 28-31 
28-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Navigation 
1. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, AND KS 
Location. Arkansas River rises in Rocky Mountains near 
Leadville, CO, and flows southeastward 1,396 miles through 
Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join Mississippi 
River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA. (See U.S. 
Geological Survey state maps, 1:24,000, and flood control 
and navigation maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulf 
of Mexico, 1970 edition scale 1:62,500.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1066, Annual 
Report for 1932, and pages 744, 864, and 881, Annual 
Report for 1943. 
Existing project. Provides for improvement of Arkansas 
River Basin by construction of coordinated developments for 
navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, 
sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. 
McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System 
provides a channel 9 feet deep and 444.8 miles long, 
beginning at mouth of White River, which enters Mississippi 
River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA, thence 9.8 
miles upstream to mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 
miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to 
mile42 (1943 survey) on Arkansas River, thence 376.0 miles 
along channel of latter stream to mouth of Verdigris River at 
navigation mile 395.0; thence 49.8 miles up Verdigris River 
to head of navigation at Catoosa, OK. 
The waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 
locks and dams with total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark- 
Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiplepurpose 
projects including power. Lock chambers are 11O0 by 
600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided 
for Verdigris River, 225 feet for San Bois Creek, 250 feet for 
Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and 
White River Entrance Channel. 
Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of 
which 13 are in Tulsa District, Kansas and Oklahoma, and 
two in Little Rock District. Pertinent data and estimated 
Federal cost are summarized in tables 28-H and 28-I, Arkansas 
River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation and Arkansas 
River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Lakes, respectively. (See 
table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. For the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas 
River Navigation System, local interests must provide adequate 
terminal and transfer facilities and bear the increased 
costs of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and 
highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, 
and other existing improvements, other than federally 
owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. 
Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation 
at Pine Bluff (Jefferson County), Little Rock, and Fort Smith, 
AR, and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa-Rogers County), 
OK. Port authorities have been organized to develop public 
facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, 
Morrilton, Clarksville, Ozark, and Van Buren, AR, and 
Sallisaw, OK. Terminal facilities are in operation or being 
built at 35 locations in Arkansas and at 25 locations in 
Oklahoma along the improved waterways. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. (See tables 28-H and 28-I for 
navigation and lake listings.) For details of McClellan-Kerr 
Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Oklahoma 
and Kansas, see the Tulsa District report. 
Flood damages prevented by Little Rock District projects 
in the Arkansas River Basin during FY 95 are estimated at 
$98,617,000; flood losses prevented through FY 95 are 
estimated $663,843,990. 
Preliminary estimates on navigation activities in calendar 
year 1995 report about 11.14 million tons of commerce were 
moved on the Arkansas portion of the McClellan-Kerr 
ArkansasRiverNavigation System. DetailsoftheMcClellan- 
Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Arkansas 
are shown on the following pages. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. (See tables 28-H and28- 
I, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation/ 
Lakes, respectively, for status for individual items, navigation 
project, lakes, and basin plan.) Work continues on the 
Arkansas River project in this District including construction 
of a meander cutoff levee between the Arkansas and 
White Rivers, extension of the stilling basin at Wilbur D. 
Mills Dam (No. 2) and land acquisition studies. 
Installation of tow haulage equipment was completed at 
David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Lock and Dam No. 
5, Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4), and Joe Hardin 
Lock and Dam (No. 3) in 1994. 
The district is proceeding with the completion of plans 
and specifications for the access facilities construction 
contract and the Feature Design Memorandum for Montgomery 
Point Lock and Dam. The FDM was submitted for 
review in late FY 95. Land acquisition began in December 
1994 and was essentially completed in 1995. 
2. ARTHUR V. ORMOND LOCK & DAM 
(NO. 9), AR 
Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal 
facilities. (See section 1.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. Construction of a non-Federal 
hydropower project, under the authority provided by the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, was completed and 
placed into operation in August 1993. Overall completion 
completed in May 1994. Rockefeller Lake (pool 9) has four 
developed parks which in FY 95 experienced public visitation 
exceeding 1.3 million visitor-hours. 
28-2

LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
April 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in 
July 1969. Construction of Holla Bend closure structure 
(fish and wildlife mitigation) began in July 1986 and was 
completed in September 1987. 
3. McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER 
NAVIGATION SYSTEM, BANK STABILIZATION & 
CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, AR 
Location. Several bank stabilization and channel rectification 
projects are laid out in various reaches extending from 
fixed point to fixed point on Arkansas River from 33.7 to 362 
miles above mouth and across the Arkansas-White cutoff, a 
4- to 5-mile natural channel joining Arkansas and White 
rivers about 18 and 12 miles above their respective mouths. 
Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification 
is apart of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation 
System. For a complete description of reach and 
location of each bank stabilization and channel rectification 
project, see the FY 81 Annual Report. Total Federal cost to 
date is $119,300,184 for existing project in Little Rock 
District. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) 
4. DAVID D. TERRY LOCK AND DAM 
(NO. 6), AR 
Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal 
facilities. (See section 1.) 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
January 1965 and lock and dam project was placed in 
operation in August 1968. Tow haulage equipment was 
added in June 1993. Currently, the project has two developed 
parks which in FY 95 experienced public visitation 
exceeding 1.7 million visitor-hours. 
5. EMMETT SANDERS LOCK AND DAM 
(NO. 4), AR 
Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal 
facilities. (See section 1.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. Pool 4 has two developed parks 
which in FY 95 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.07 
million visitor-hours. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
May 1964 and lock and dam project was placed in operation 
in December 1968. Construction of a 40-foot wide, 9,600 
long highway bridge crossing the lock and dam began 
February 1992 and was completed late 1994. The Corps of 
Engineers, as the Federal agency, has jurisdiction and 
custody of the dam (23 U.S.C. 320 [Public Law 85-67]). The 
project is 100 percent funded by the Arkansas State Highway 
and Transportation Department and the Federal Highway 
Administration. Tow haulage equipment was placed into 
operation in June 1993. 
6. JAMES W. TRIMBLE LOCK AND DAM 
(NO. 13), AR 
SLocation, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal 
facilities. (See section 1.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. In FY 95, the project's three 
developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 
3.02 million visitor-hours. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
October 1965 and lock and dam were placed in operation in 
April 1969. Bridge across dam was completed in July 1968. 
Construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility at the 
project was completed in November 1988 under the authority 
provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 
7. LOCK NO.2 AND WILBUR D. MILLS DAM 
(NO. 2), AR 
Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal 
facilities. (See section 1.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation 
and maintenance continued. Wilbur D. Mills has four developed 
parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation 
exceeding 3.3 million visitor-hours that resulted in $85,314 
fee revenue. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
May 1963. Lock was placed in operation in March 1968. 
Emergency repairs to the scour protection features and 
tainter gates at the dam that resulted from a barge accident 
in December 1982 were completed in FY 85. The barges that 
clogged the dam gates during the December 1982 flood 
showed that, with a certain set of circumstances (higher than 
normal head combined with the clogged gates resulted in 
high current velocity that caused both upstream and downstream 
scouring), the structure could fail. This condition 
exists primarily because the structure was constructed on 
piling and designed for all of the gates to operate in unison. 
A model study by the Waterways Experiment Station 
determined the most feasible solution to this problem is to 
extend the stilling basin downstream. A contract to extend 
the stilling basin was awarded in June 1990 and completed 
in FY 1994. Project costs are estimated at $21.6 million. A 
contract was awarded in September 1995 to add tow haulage 
equipment at Lock No. 2. 
8. JOE HARDIN LOCK AND DAM (NO. 3), AR 
Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal 
facilities. (See section 1.) 
28-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. Pool 3 has three developed 
parks which in FY 95 experienced public visitation exceeding 
481,541 visitor-hours. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
May 1963 and lock and dam were placed in operation in 
December 1968. Tow haulage equipment was installed and 
operational in 1993. 
9. LOCK AND DAM NO.5, AR 
Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal 
facilities. (See section 1.) 
Operation and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. Pool 5 has two developed 
parks which in FY 95 experienced public visitation exceeding 
704,642 visitor-hours. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
November 1964 and lock and dam were placed in operation 
in December 1968. Tow haulage equipment was installed in 
June 1993. 
10. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET 
AND MARINE TERMINALS, AR 
Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal 
facilities. (See section 1.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation 
and maintenance continued. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Pine 
Bluff Marine Terminal began March 1968 and was placed in 
operation in April 1969. Construction of Dardanelle Marine 
Terminal began June 1968 and was placed in operation in 
November 1969. 
11. MURRAY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 7), AR 
Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal 
facilities. (See section 1.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation 
and maintenance continued. Murray has five developed 
parks which in FY 95 experienced public visitation exceeding 
4.1 million visitor-hours. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation 
in October 1969. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower 
facility at the project was completed in May 1988 under the 
authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 
12. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
Preauthorization studies under the small project continuing 
authorities program, navigation activities, Section 107, 
Public Law 86-645, as amended. No activity during this 
fiscal year. 
13. NORRELL LOCK AND DAM (NO. 1) 
AND ENTRANCE CHANNEL, AR 
Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal 
facilities. (See section 1.) 
Recommended modification. The White River Entrance 
Channel is the first reach in the McClellan-Kerr 
Arkansas River Navigation System project. The water 
surface elevation in the entrance channel is controlled by the 
elevation of the Mississippi River. Increased fluctations in 
the Mississippi River have resulted in low water flows and 
reduced tow traffic due to constricted channel. 
A lock and dam at mile 0.6 in the White River entrance 
channel was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 
24,1946, but was not construction because it was not needed 
at the time. Low water conditions in the entrance channel 
have since then disrupted navigation to the extent that 
Montgomery Point Lock and Dam is needed to eliminated 
the tow restrictions. The District is proceeding with award 
of a construction contract for the access road. Purchase of 
real estate began in December 1994 and is complete. The 
construction contract is scheduled for award in June 1997. 
(See 1. Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation 
and maintenance continued. The project currently has one 
developed park which in FY 95 experienced public visitation 
exceeding 85,764 visitor-hours. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
May 1963, and lock and dam were placed in operation in 
June 1967. A contract was awarded in September 1995 to 
add tow haulage equipment to the lock. 
14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION 
PROJECTS 
(See table 28-C for other authorized navigation projects.) 
15. TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK AND DAM 
(NO. 8), AR 
Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal 
facilities. (See section 1.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. In FY 95, the project's 
five developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 
1.65 million visitor-hours. 
28-4

LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
July 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in 
November 1969. Conway water supply project was completed 
and transferred to the city for operation and maintenance 
in July 1983. 
Flood Control 
16. BLACK RIVER OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL, 
BUTLER COUNTY, MO 
Location. The project area begins approximately 6 miles 
south of Poplar Bluff, MO, and extends to Arkansas State 
line. This area is about 160 miles south of St. Louis, MO. 
Existing project. The Detailed Project Report recommends 
removing all major blockages from the channel just 
upstream of the Hargrove Bridge (R.M. 198.4) to the Arkansas 
State line (R.M. 170.9). The plan also involves the 
cutting of dead, dying or damaged rooted trees which are 
leaning over the channel at an angle greater than 30 degrees 
and in danger of falling and creating a blockage to flows. 
Local cooperation. The local cooperation agreement 
was signed May 15, 1992, by the Butler County Commission, 
the project sponsor, in accordance with Section 3 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1936, and amendments thereto. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. The project 
was completed in late 1993 and turned over to the local 
sponsor. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project contract was 
awarded in June 1993, and construction was completed in 
November 1993. Project construction was authorized under 
Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The 
project cost was $364,000; $273,000, Federal; $91,000 non- 
Federal. 
17. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR 
Location. (See Table 28-I: Arkansas River Basin, AR, 
OK, and KS: Lakes.) 
Existing project. Construction cost was approximately 
$5.1 million. For further information see pages 906 and 907 
of 1962 Annual Report. (For authorization see table 28-B.) 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 
applies. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation 
and maintenance of project continued. Flood damages 
prevented during FY 95 are estimated at $91,400; cumulative 
benefits through September 30, 1994, are estimated at 
$25,345,540. The project's seven developed parks experienced 
public visitation exceeding 1.7 million visitor-hours. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete 
except for additional recreational sanitary facilities. Construction 
of the project began in May 1940 and was placed in 
operation in March 1947. 
18. CATO SPRINGS BRANCH AND TOWN BRANCH, 
FAYETTEVILLE, AR 
Location. This project is located on the southside of 
Fayetteville, in Washington County (Northwestern Arkansas). 
Existing Project. Plans consist of clearing and grubbing 
along Cato Springs Branch and Town Branch and removing 
a horseshoe shaped bend along Cato Springs Branch by 
excavating 300 feet of new channel. 
Construction is authorized under the Continuing Authorities 
Program, Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as 
amended. 
Local cooperation. The city of Fayetteville signed a local 
cooperation agreement on Aug. 9, 1994, and contributed its 
share, $12,400, of the project cost. The total project cost is 
$304,600, with the Federal share amounting to $190,000. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans and 
specifications were completed. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction award is 
scheduled for January 1996. 
19. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO 
Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin, AR & 
MO: Lakes.) 
Existing project. Construction cost, including the cost of 
modifying the project, is estimated at $22.4 million. For 
further information see pages 897 and 898 of 1962 Annual 
Report. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Major rehabilitation. Construction began in November 
1987 on a seepage berm on the upstream face of the dam, a 
grout curtain on the right abutment, and a parapet wall along 
the dam. 
An additional 9 acres of land was acquired to widen the 
spillway from 190 feet to 370 feet The widened spillway 
will pass about 90 percent of the probable maximum flood 
with water surface at the top of existing dam and parapet 
wall, preventing waves from overtopping dam. 
The cost of the modification is estimated at $11 million. 
Construction was essentially complete in September 1989. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 
applies. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation 
28-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented 
during FY 95 are estimated at $2,937,000; cumulative benefits 
through September 1995 are estimated at $123,537,550. 
Project currently has seven developed parks which in FY 95 
experienced public visitation exceeding 4.95 million visitor-
hours. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete 
except for additional and improvement to sanitary facilities 
in recreation areas. Construction of project began in 
June 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in March 1948. 
20. CROOKED CREEK, HARRISON, AR 
Location. Crooked Creek is located within the city limits 
of Harrison, Boone County, Ark. 
Existing Project. The Definite Project Report (DPR) 
recommended clearing and grubbing Crooked Creek for 
flood control and placement of a low flow concrete weir as a 
fishery mitigation feature under Section 205 of the 1948 
Flood Control Act. The report was approved in September 
1991. Plans and specifications were completed and construction 
initiated in October 1993. The estimated cost is $1.245 
million and the Federal share is $933,000. 
Local cooperation. The city of Harrison cost-shared the 
feasibility study, plans and specifications and construction 
of the project according to Section 103, Water Resources 
Development Act, 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 
Operations and results during the fiscal year. Completed 
project construction. Financial completion pending 
sponsor's submission of final credity requests for relocations. 
21. DEQUEEN LAKE, AR 
Location. On Rolling Fork River, river mile 22.8, a 
tributary of Little River, in Sevier County, about 4 miles 
northwest of DeQueen, AR. (See Geological Survey map for 
Chapel Hill, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,360 feet long, 
constructed to 160 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled 
spillway, 200 feet wide, is about 1,400 feet east of main 
embankment Outlet works consist of a gated conduit, 
12 feet in diameter. 
The lake controls 169 square miles of drainage area and 
provides a total storage of 136,100 acre-feet (101,200 for 
flood control storage and 34,900 for conservation and sedimentation 
reserve). Federal cost of project is estimated at 
$19,623,752. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, 
and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, 
apply. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine 
operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages 
prevented during FY 95 are estimated at $421,000; cumulative 
benefits through September 30, 1995, are estimated at 
$7,154,020. In FY 95, the project's seven developed parks 
experienced public visitation exceeding 784,664 visitorhours. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began 
April 1966. Project was placed in useful operation in 
August 1977. 
22. DIERKS LAKE, AR 
Location. On Saline River, river mile 56.6, a tributary of 
Little River, about 5 miles northwest of Dierks, Howard 
County, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Dierks Dam, 
AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,760 feet long, 
about 153 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 
800 feet wide is in a saddle at west end of dam. Outlet works 
consisting of a gated 6- by 9-foot oblong conduit, one 24- 
inch low-flow pipe, and one 30-inch water supply pipe are 
provided. The lake controls a drainage area of 114 square 
miles and provides for storage of 67,100 acre-feet for flood 
control and 29,700 acre-feet for water supply, conservation, 
and sedimentation reserve, a total of 96,800 acre-feet. Federal 
cost of project is estimated at $16,002,781. (See table 
28-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Actof 1938, 
and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented 
during FY 95 are estimated at $189,200; cumulative benefits 
through September 30, 1995, are estimated at $4,769,240. 
During the year, more than 270 acre-feet of water supply 
storage were withdrawn by Tri-Lakes Water District Currently 
has four developed parks which in FY 95 experienced 
1.3 million visitor- hours. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
June 1968. In May 1975, the embankment closure was 
completed and the project placed in useful operation. 
23. DRY JORDAN CREEK, HARRISON, AR 
Location. Dry Jordan Creek is within the city limits of 
Harrison, Boone County, Ark. 
Existing Project. The Definite Project (DPR) recommended 
clearing and grubbing with some bank stabilization 
on 2.5 miles of Dry Jordon Creek, under Section 205 of the 
1948 Flood Control Act. The estimated cost is $1.3 million 
and the Federal share is $845,000. 
28-6

LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 
Local cooperation. The city of Harrison, the local 
cosponsor and the Federal government cost-shared the feasibility 
study. The city has signed a letter of intent to cost 
share construction of the project, according to Section 103 of 
the Water Resources Development Act, 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 
Operations and results during the fiscal year. Initiated 
plans and specifications with expenditures of $69,300. 
24. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
(1) Emergency bank protection, Section 14, 1946 Flood 
Control Act. Fiscal year costs: State Hwy. #211, Current 
River, Clay Co., $66,864.58 Federal, $6,132.16, non-Federal; 
and Sewage Lagoon, Little Red River, Judsonia, Ark., 
$78,931.22, Federal and $33,250 non-Federal. 
(2) Snagging and clearing, Section 208, 1954 Flood 
Control Act. Fiscal year costs: None. 
(3) Flood control activities, Section 205, 1948 Flood 
Control Act. Fiscal year costs: Black River, Poplar Bluff, 
Mo., $46,200 Federal, and $46,200 non-Federal; Bull Creek, 
Taney Co., Mo., $17,543.13; East Fork of Cadron Creek, 
Ark., $4,208.80; and Gar Creek, Franklin Co., Ark., 
$19,434.14. 
25. FOURCHE BAYOU BASIN, LITTLE ROCK, AR 
Location. On Fourche, Rock and Grassy Flat Creeks in 
vicinity of Little Rock, Pulaski County, AR. 
Existing project. The project, authorized by the Water 
Resources Development Actof 1986 (PL 99-662), consists of 
widening, clearing and snagging with alteration of highway 
and railroad bridges. The estimated project cost is $29 million: 
Federal, $19.1 million; non-Federal, $9.9 million. 
Local cooperation. The city of Little Rock, the project 
sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement in August 
1987. 
Operations and results during the fiscal year. Construction 
continued on the remaining two channel improvement 
contracts. The final construction contract was awarded 
on June 28, 1991. The overall project is 98 percent completed. 
Expenditures in FY 95 were $838,542.17 Federal, 
and $38,496.32 non-Federal. 
26. GILLHAM LAKE, AR 
Location. Damsite is on Cossatot River, river mile 49.0, 
in Howard County, about 5 miles northeast of Gillham in 
Sevier County, AR.(See Geological Survey quadrangle map 
for Gillham Dam, AR, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement, 
see pages 19-12 of Annual Report for 1977 (Tulsa 
District). Federal cost of project is estimated at $17,826,703. 
(See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, 
and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, 
apply. Tri-Lakes Water District furnished a resolution of 
intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during 
FY 95 are estimated at $627,400; total cumulative flood 
damages prevented are estimated at $9,730,170. During the 
year, Tri-Lakes Water District withdrew 787 acre-feet of 
water supply storage. In FY 95, the project's five developed 
parks experienced public visitation exceeding 872,247 visitor-
hours that resulted in $37,999 fee revenue. 
Condition at end of rfiscal year. Construction began in 
June 1968. The embankment closure was completed in 
May 1975, and the project was placed in useful operation. 
27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of 
flood control works, Part 208 of Title 33, Code of Federal 
Regulations, provide for periodic inspection of completed 
projects transferred to local interests for operation and 
maintenance. Inspections of local flood protection projects 
were made to determine extent of compliance with approved 
regulations for maintenance and operation of these projects. 
Responsible officials of improvement districts concerned 
were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation 
of local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where 
appropriate. Costs for FY 95 were $102,970. Total accumulative 
cost through September 30, 1995, was $1,749,469. 
28. LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR 
Location. Improvements are on Little River and tributaries 
in Arkansas. More definite location of individual items is 
shown in table 28-J. 
Existing project. Part of a six-lake system for flood 
control and other purposes in the Little River Basin. The 
system consists of four lakes in Arkansas: Millwood on the 
main stem, Dierks on the Saline River, DeQueen on the 
Rolling Fork River, and Gillham on the Cossatot River, and, 
two lakes in Oklahoma: Broken Bow on the Mountain Fork 
River and Pine Creek on the Little River. Under a District 
boundarychange,effectivein October 1980,thefourprojects 
in this system in Arkansas were reassigned from the Tulsa 
District to the Little Rock District. 
28-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, 
and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, 
apply. Tri-Lakes Water District (DeQueen, Gillham, and 
Dierks) furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs 
allocated to water supply storage. The Southwest Arkansas 
Water District is currently repaying costs allocated to water 
supply storage at Millwood Lake. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation 
and maintenance ofprojects continued. See individual projects 
for details. Flood damages prevented by the Little River 
Basin reservoirs during FY 95 are estimated at $1,679,500; 
cumulative benefits through September 30, 1995, are estimated 
at $33,091,840. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Millwood, DeQueen, 
Gillham, and Dierks Lakes are complete and in operation. 
29. MILL CREEK, FORT SMITH, AR 
Location. In southwest Fort Smith, Sebastian County, 
AR. 
Existing project. The project was constructed under 
Section 205 of the Continuing Authorities Program. The 
project included improvements on 3.9 miles of the Mill 
Creek channel and modifications on three bridges. The 
estimated project cost is $8,942,000: $4,838,000, Federal; 
$4,104,000, non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. The city of Fort Smith, the local 
sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement in November 
1988. 
Conditions at end of fiscal year.The Engineers Board of 
Claims and Appeals awarded the contractor $200,000 in 
claims. The contractor has appealed $1.2 million. The 
contract for channel construction was awarded in August 
1990. Project construction was completed in November 
1992 and turned over to the city of Fort Smith for 
operation and maintenance. 
30. MILLWOOD LAKE, AR 
Location. On Little River, river mile 16.0, approximately 
7 miles east of Ashdown, Little River County, AR, 
and about2 miles northeastof Millwood, Little RiverCounty, 
AR. (See Geological Survey quadrangle map for Red Bluff, 
AR, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For description of completed improvement 
and authorizing legislation see the 1969 Annual 
Report (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is $46,100,082. 
(See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 
applies. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine 
operation and maintenance continued. More than 
66,000 acre-feet of water was released from the lake for 
water supply to Southwest Arkansas Water District Flood 
damages prevented during FY 95 are estimated at $441,900, 
cumulative benefits through September 30, 1995, are estimated 
at $11,438,410 Millwood Lake has 12 developed 
parks which in FY 95 experienced public visitation exceeding 
3.3 million visitor-hours. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
September 1961 and the project was placed in full floodcontrol 
operation in August 1966. Remaining work consists 
of additional recreational facilities. 
31. NIMROD LAKE, AR 
Location. (See Table 28-1: Arkansas River Basin, AR, 
OK, and KS: Lakes.) 
Existing project. Estimated cost is $4,005,627. For 
further information see pages 908 and 909 of 1962 Annual 
Report. See table 28-B for authorizing legislation. 
Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control 
Act applies. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation 
and maintenance of project continued. Addition and improvement 
to existing recreation sanitary facilities continued. 
In FY 95, seven parks experienced public visitation 
exceeding 2.65 million visitor-hours. During FY 95, flood 
damages prevented on an average of 2,000 acres of improved 
land are estimated at $360,400; cumulative benefits through 
September 30, 1995, are estimated at $17,695,790. More 
than 90 acre-feet of water was withdrawn by the city of 
Plainview, AR. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete 
except for addition of and improvement to sanitary recreation 
facilities. A vault rest room was converted to waterborne 
with shower at Sunlight Bay Park. 
Construction of project began in January 1940 and was 
ready for beneficial use in January 1942. 
32. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL 
PROJECTS 
(See Table 28-E: Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects.) 
33. WHITE RIVER BASIN 
(LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT), AR & MO 
Location. Improvements are on White River and tribu- 
28-8

LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 
taries, Arkansas and Missouri. More definite location of 
individual items is shown in Table 28-K: White River Basin. 
Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for 
flood control and other purposes in White River Basin. The 
plan includes seven lakes; two are flood control only projects 
and five are multiple-purpose projects. Beaver, Table Rock, 
Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, Greers Ferry and Bell 
Foley lakes were selected and approved for construction by 
Chief of Engineers, and individual reports on six of these 
seven lakes are presented on subsequent pages. The Bell 
Foley project, the remaining unbuilt authorized project, was 
reevaluated in FY 89; the project continues to have a favorable 
benefit-to-cost ratio since its formulation in 1968. The 
lakes in the plan are listed in Table 28-K: White River Basin. 
(For authorization see Table 28-B.) 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 
applies, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies to 
Beaver, Greers Ferry, and Norfork projects. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation 
and maintenance of projects continued. Flood damages 
prevented by the White River Basin lakes during FY95 are 
estimated at $22,088,300; cumulative benefits through September 
30, 1995, are estimated at $438,337,720. Flood 
damages prevented by the White River Basin levees during 
FY 95 are estimated at $2,261,100; cumulative benefits 
through September 30, 1995, are estimated at $77,042,810 
Electric energy delivered to Southwestern Power Administration 
for marketing during FY 95 totaled 2.7 billion 
kilowatt-hours. 
Water releases for fish hatcheries were: 28,960 acre-feet 
from Norfork Lake for Fish and Wildlife Service trout 
hatchery; 14,480 acre-feet from Table Rock Lake for Missouri 
Conservation Commission trout hatchery; and, 
14,480 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake for U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service trout hatchery. 
Withdrawals for water supply purposes were: Beaver 
Water District, AR, 31,460 acre-feet, and Carroll-Boone 
Water District, AR, 4,972 acre-feet, from Beaver Lake; 
Marion County Regional Water District, AR, 724 acre-feet 
from Bull Shoals Lake; Water and Sewer Improvement 
District No. 3 of Mountain Home, AR, 3,322 acre-feet from 
Norfork Lake; the city of Clinton, AR, 1,153 acre-feet, and 
the Community Water Treatment System, Cleburne County, 
AR, 946 acre-feet, from Greers Ferry Lake. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull 
Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, and Greers Ferry lakes are 
complete and in operation. Progress on these lakes is shown 
in individual reports. Bell Foley lake project is in a deferred 
status. Water Valley and Lone Rock lakes have been 
deauthorized. 
34. WHITE RIVER, BATESVILLE, AR 
Location. On White River, within the city of Batesville, 
Independence County, AR. 
Existing project. The Definite Project Report, recommending 
construction of a levee and floodwall to protect the 
industrial area, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control 
Act, was approved in June 1988. Estimated cost is $3.2 
million. The federal share is $2.4 million. 
Local cooperation. The city of Batesville signed a local 
cooperation agreement in January 1994 with the U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers. The city's share is $811,000. 
Operations and results during the fiscal year. Acquisition 
of real estate was completed in May 1995. The levee/ 
floodwall construction contract was awarded in July 1995. 
Construction is scheduled for completion in September 
1996. 
Multiple-Purpose Projects 
Including Power 
35. BEAVER LAKE, AR 
Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin.) 
Existing project. Estimated cost is $50,797,000. For 
further information see 788 and 789 of 1966 Annual Report. 
(For authorization see table 28-B.) 
Major rehabilitation. Since the dam was constructed 
there has been a seepage problem below Dike No. 1. Based 
on detailed investigation, it was determined that the limestone 
foundation under dike 1 and 200 feet of the north end 
of the main dam embankment is the main problem. The plan 
of improvement was a concrete seepage cutoff in dike 1 and 
the north end of the main dam. A $16.9-million contract to 
construct a concrete cutoff wall was awarded in June 1989; 
the notice to proceed was issued in October 1989. The 
contract period was estimated to be 760 days. However, the 
contractor ceased productive work due to inability to excavate 
rock and was been placed in default. An $18.8 
reprocurement contract was awarded in April 1992, and 
work began in May 1992 to complete the work. Project cost 
is estimated at $26.2 million; $11.7 million in FY 94. 
Water Quality Enhancement. Congress directed the 
Corps to implement best management practices (BMP's) in 
the Beaver Lake watershed and monitor the effects of these 
practices on water quality. A study was completed and a 
project report was approved in July 1989. The BMP's and 
water quality monitoring are being concurrently implemented 
over a 5-year period which began in May 1991 with 
a project completion date of June 1996. 
28-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
The BMP's are being implemented under the terms of a 
memorandum of agreement between the Corps and the Soil 
Conservation Service (SCS) with the assistance of the Agricultural 
Stabilization and Conservation Service. The local 
cost sharing for the BMP's are being obtained from the non- 
Federal participants (farmers) primarily by work-in-kind 
credit. The water quality monitoring is being implemented 
under terms of a local cost-sharing agreement with the 
Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission 
(AS&WCC). Water quality monitoring is being performed 
in consultation with the Environmental Protection Agency 
by a Corps administered contract. Project agreements were 
signed on May 11, 1991, at Rogers, AR. BMP's are being 
implemented by SCS and AS&WCC obtained leases of the 
real estate for the water quality monitoring sites November 
6,1991. The water quality monitoring contract was awarded 
on January 29, 1992. Water quality sampling began in May 
1992. BMP implementation was completed August 31, 
1995. Cost in FY 95 was $835,389.26 Federal, and $42,067.27 
non-Federal. 
Local Cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control 
Act,and Section 301 the 1958 Water Supply Act, asamended, 
apply. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented 
during FY 95 are estimated at $2,300,800; cumulative benefits 
are estimated at $32,017,540. During the year, 
180,946,800 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered 
to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. 
Water supply storage withdrawn during the year was 
36,433 acre-feet. The project has 9 developed parks which 
in FY 95 experienced public visitation exceeding 17.66 
million visitor-hours that resulted in $602,653 fee revenue. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete 
except for modifications to existing recreation and sanitary 
facilities. Alterations to existing parks to enhance fee collections, 
improve efficiency, and reduce the maintenance effort 
or rehabilitate the 25-year old park operation through operation 
and maintenance and Special Rercreation User Fee 
funds, as appropriate. Construction of project began in 
October 1959 and was placed in operation for flood control 
in December 1963, hydroelectric power generation with 
both units in May 1965, and water supply in January 1966. 
Work on a dam seepage problem is described above. 
36. BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR 
Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin, AR & 
MO.) 
Existing project. Estimated cost with eight generating 
units is $96,356,000. For further information see pages 725 
and 726 of 1965 Annual Report. For authorization see 
table 28-B. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 
applies. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during 
FY 95 are estimated at $7,887,000; total cumulative 
flood damages prevented are estimated at $130,944,170. 
During the year, more than 1 billion kilowatt-hours of 
electrical energy were delivered to Southwestern Power 
Administration for marketing. Water supply storage withdrawn 
during the year was 724 acre-feet. The project has 
18 developed parks which in FY 95 experienced public 
visitation exceeding 20.9 million visitor-hours. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete 
except for modifications to existing recreation and sanitary 
facilities. Alterations are needed to existing parks to enhance 
fee collections, to improve efficiency, to reduce maintenance 
effort or to rehabilitate 36-year-old park facilities through 
operations and maintenance or SRUF funds, as appropriate. 
Low dissolved oxygen readings in the downstream area of 
Bull Shoals Dam in October 1990 have resulted in ongoing 
studies to be undertaken to minimize harmful effects on the 
trout fishing of the White River. 
Unguaranteed short-term solutions to the problem, consisting 
of limiting generation, will sustain the existing 
fishery, but long-term guaranteed changes will require congressional 
authorization. Construction of project began in 
April 1946 and was ready for beneficial flood control use in 
June 1951 and generation of electrical energy in September 
1952. Units 1 through 8 were placed in operation September 
1952, December 1952, June 1953, January 1962, 
February 1962, August 1963, September 1963, and January 
1964, respectively. 
Major rehabilitation. A major rehabilitation study 
was initiated in October 1995. The study will investigate a 
solution to the environmentally induced reliability problem 
(low dissolved oxygen) of units 1 through 8 and the mismatch 
between turbines and generators of units 1 through 4. 
37. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 10), AR 
Location. (See Table 28-H: Arkansas River Basin; AR, 
OK, and KS: Navigation.) 
Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr 
Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,683 feet long 
and 68 feet high. It has a spillway with 20 tainter gates 
50 feet long and 39 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 
600 feet with a lift of 54 feet. Powerhouse contains four 
31,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 
486,200 acre-feet. Estimated cost is $86,507,000. (See table 
28-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. (See section 1.) 
28-10

LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. Pool fluctuated within 2-ft. 
power pondage, elevation 336.0 to 338.0. Power generation 
continued. During FY 95, about 670 million kilowatthours 
of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern 
Power Administration for marketing. In FY 95, the project's 
15 developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 
6.7 million visitor-hours. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete 
except for addition and improvement to existing recreation 
sanitary facilities. The hydraulic turbines at the Dardanelle 
powerplant will require extensive rehabilitation in the near 
future. Complete disassembly of the turbines will be required 
to replace the turbine blade bearings and oil seals. 
Several repair alternatives are being examined including 
replacement of the turbines to increase the available power 
output of the generating units. Index testing to determine 
new turbine design is underway. Construction began 
June 1957. Power units were placed on line in April, May, 
and September 1965, and January 1966. Lock became 
operable in December 1969. Visitors Center and resident 
office were completed in May 1985. 
Major Rehabilitation. The feasibility report, completed 
in 1991, recommended replacing the existing four units at 
Dardanelle with new "state-of-the-art" generating units. The 
Design Memorandum was approved in 1993. The project is 
scheduled to be completed in December 1998. 
38. GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR 
Location. (See Table 28-K: White River, AR & MO.) 
Existing project. Estimated cost is $55,125,000. For further 
information see page 740 of 1964 Annual Report. (See 
table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Section 2,1938 Flood Control Act and 
1988 Water Supply Act, as amended, apply. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during 
FY 95 are estimated at $914,200; total cumulative flood 
damages prevented are estimated at $26,769,830. In FY 95, 
17.5 billion kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered 
to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. 
In FY 95, more than 2,000 acre-feet of water supply 
storage was withdrawn. The project has 18 developed parks 
which in FY 95 experienced public visitation exceeding 
31.2 million visitor-hours. The project's operational management 
plan provides means by which the natural resources, 
including water quality, aesthetic value, forestry, 
fish and wildlife are managed and protected for future 
generations. An all-volunteer environmental program (annual 
cleanup) has been most successful and serves as a model 
for the Nation. During the past 26 years the program has won 
more than 26 national awards. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete 
except for addition and improvement to existing recreation 
sanitary facilities. Constructionofprojectbeganin June 1957 
and was ready for beneficial flood control use in January 
1962. Power units 1 and 2 were operable in March and 
May 1964, and water supply was operable in April 1971. 
The Visitors Center was completed in June 1983 at a cost of 
$813,000. 
39. NORFORK LAKE, AR 
Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin, AR & 
MO.) 
Existing project. Total estimated cost is $111,624,000, 
including $38,700,000 for addition of power units 3 and 4, 
and $40,000,000 for highway bridge construction. For further 
information see page 896 of 1962 Aninual Report. (See 
table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 
and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during 
FY 95 are estimated at $2,417,900; total cumulative 
flood damages prevented through September 30, 1995, are 
estimated at $43,756,830. During the year, more than 340 
million kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to 
the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water 
supply withdrawn by the city of Mountain Home, AR, totaled 
more than 3,000 acre-feet. The project's 18 developed parks 
experienced public visitation exceeding 16.2 million visitor-
hours during FY 95. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete 
except for addition and improvement to existing recreation 
sanitary facilities, and addition of power units 3 and 4. 
Construction of project began in October 1940, ready for 
beneficial flood control use in June 1943, and for generation 
of electrical energy with one unit in June 1944. Second unit 
was added in February 1950. Water supply was added as a 
purpose in December 1969. Construction of two highway 
bridges over Norfork Lake to replace ferries was completed 
in November 1982. The bridges were transferred to the 
Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department for operation 
and maintenance in July 1984. 
40. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM 
(No. 12), AR 
Location. (See Table 28-H: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, 
and KS: Navigation.) 
Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr 
28-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Arkansas River Navigation System. The dam is 2,480 feet 
long and 58 feet above streambed; spillway has 15 tainter 
gates 50 feet long and 46 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 
by 600 feet with a lift of 34 feet. Powerhouse contains five 
20,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 
148,400 acre-feet. In addition, 1 foot of power pondage is 
provided in pool 13 between elevations 391.0 and 392.0. 
Estimated cost is $86,167,000. (For authorization see 
table 28-B.) 
Local cooperation. (See section 1.) 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. Delivered 324,561,450 kilowatt-
hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration 
for marketing. Ozark Lake has 10 developed 
parks which in FY 95 experienced public visitation exceeding 
1.6-million-visitor-hours. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 
December 1964. Project is complete except for addition and 
improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Lock 
and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Power 
units were placed on line as follows: unit 1, November 1972; 
unit 2, August 1973; unit 3, October 1973; unit 4, December 
1973; and unit 5, May 1974. Remaining work consists 
principally of modifications to the powerplant. 
41. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO 
Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin, AR & 
MO.) 
Existing project. Estimated cost is $71,233,000. For 
further information see page 893 of 1962 Annual Report. 
(For authorization see table 28-B.) 
Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control 
Act applies. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued 
operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented 
during FY 95 are estimated at $5,631,400; total cumulative 
flood damages prevented are estimated at $81,311,780. 
During the year, about 820 million kilowatt-hours of electrical 
energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration 
for marketing. The District and the Waterways 
Experiment Station are investigating the possibilities of 
improving the quality of Table Rock releases with a 
hypolimnetic oxygenation system. Table Rock Lake has 
16 developed parks which in FY 95 experienced public 
visitation exceeding 34.9 million visitor-hours. This project's 
operational management plan provides means by which the 
natural resources, including forestry, fish and wildlife, are 
managed and protected for future generations. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete 
except for addition and improvement to existing recreational 
sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 
1954. The project was ready for beneficial flood control 
use in November 1958, and for generation of electrical 
energy with units 1 and 2 in May 1959. Units 3 and 4 were 
added in April and June 1961. 
General Investigations 
42. SURVEYS 
Expenditures for surveys in FY 95 totaled $380,011.83: 
Flood damage prevention studies. Arkansas River 
Tucker Creek, $271,817.01: Arkansas River Levees, 
$295,520.33; Arkansas River Wetlands and Flood Control, 
$6,904.53; and White River Wetlands, $13,501.14. 
Review of completed projects. Clearwater Lake Restudy, 
$15,062.33. 
Miscellaneous activities. Special investigations, 
$27,611.35; review of FERC licenses, $4,741.99; Interagency 
Water Resource Development, $15,649.59; North 
American Waterfowl Management Plan, $1,704.25. 
Coordination studies with other agencies. Department 
of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, $4,720.72; Environmental 
Services Partnerships, $18,298.92. 
43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 
Flood plain management services (FPMS). The authority 
for the Flood Plain Management Services program is 
Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as 
amended. Under the authority of Section 321 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990, PL 101-640, technical 
services and planning assistance are (1) provided to states 
and local governments without charge and (2) offered to 
Federal agencies and private persons on a cost recovery 
basis. Through these technical services and planning guidance, 
the program encourages comprehensive flood plain 
management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for 
losses to life and property from floods. 
Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector 
are assisted with planning and development information for 
flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local 
flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, 
and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance 
may include factual flood information (available or 
determined) and interpretation of flood frequencies, extent 
of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and 
floodway limits. 
Hydrologic studies. During FY 95, 131 stations were 
operated; 78 cooperatively with USGS, 39 by the Corps, and 
15 by the National Weather Service. The total cost for 
28-12

LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 
streamflow and some sediment data from all sources of 
funding was $807,740, of which $579,000 was transferred to 
USGS. 
The District also participated in a cooperative program 
with National Weather Service for rainfall and/or river 
reporting stations for use in forecasting streamflow for flood 
warning and operation of lake projects. Records were also 
collected at certain hydroclimate rainfall stations under a 
cooperative program between the two agencies. For these 
services, $52,600 was transferred to the National Weather 
Service. 
Environmental Restoration (Section 1135) 
44.NIMROD WATERFOWL LEVEE,NIMROD LAKE, 
ARKANSAS 
Location. Nimrod Lake is located on the Fourche LaFave 
Rive at river mile 62.6. The project area consists of a 2,400- 
acre green tree reservoir located within the flood control pool 
of the lake. 
Existing project. The proposed modification consists of 
construction a new 7-foot by 7-foot by 13.6-foot gate well 
structure including a 36-inch canal gate with a headwheel 
and 68 feet of 36-inch reinforced concrete pipe on the 
existing levee. 
Construction is authorized under the Continuing Authority 
Program, Section 1135(b) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986, as amended: Environmental Restoration. 
Local cooperation. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission 
requested the study in a letter dated Jan. 11, 1995,and 
the commission has its 25 percent share of the project costs. 
Operations and results during the fiscal year. An 
initial appraisal report was submitted April 11, 1995, to 
Corps of Engineers headquarters for review. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Work has begun on the 
feasibility phase. 
45. MORGAN POINT BENDWAY 
CLOSURE STRUCTURE, DESHA COUNTY, AR 
Location. This project is located immediately downstream 
of the non-overflow embankment of the Wilbur D. 
Mills Dam of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation 
System, in Desha County (Southeastern Arkansas). 
Existing project. The project modification report was 
approved in September 1995 under Section 1135(b) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended: 
Environmental Restoration. The report recommended construction 
of a closure structure at the downstream end of the 
bendway, placement of a water intake structure, cypress tree 
plantings and placement of fish shelters. The project is 
intended to restore about 7 miles of riverine and wetland 
habitat damaged by the constructiom and operation of the 
Wilbur D. Mills Dam. 
Local cooperation. The state of Arkansas is the sponsor 
with a cost share of 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non- 
Federal. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans and 
specifications were initiated in September 1995. 
28-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1',2 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY94 FY95 Sept.30,1995* 
Arkansas River 
Basin, AR 
OK & KS 
3. McClellan-Kerr 
Arkansas River 
Bank Stabilization 
& Channel 
Rectification, 
AR 
2,4-9, McClellan-Kerr 
11,13,15 Arkansas River 
Navigation 
Locks & Dams, 
AR 
16. Black River, Obstruc. 
Removal, 
Butler Co., MO 
17. Blue Mountain 
Lake, AR 
New Work 
Approp. 
Dams 
Navigation 
Cost 
Dams 
Navigation 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Dams 
Navigation 
Cost 
Dams 
Navigation 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Special Funds 
Cost 
Other 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Other 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Other 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
$13,161,000 
13,161,000 
4,852,926 
13,041,996 
13,041,996 
63,710,984 
15,498,300 
48,212,684 
62,773,752 
15,194,861 
47,578,891 
$ 670,000 $11,629,060 
29,905 
57,766,113 
15,415,400 
42,340,713 
59,679,646 
17,695,243 
41,984,403 
84,439 
7,883,563 
51,274,602 
22,138,031 
29,136,571 
51,219,208 
23,295,395 
27,923,813 
$2,488 
56,035,960 
11,968,850 
44,067,110 
59,936,450 
12,040,914 
47,895,536 
$1,504,715,803 
163,479,533 
1,328,937,210 
1,495,826,619 
163,321,500 
1,324,587,651 
1,097,342,214 2 
253,053,676 
844,278,538 
1,100,340,321 2 
255,398,4012 
844,941,920 
291,106 
- 378,033 
--- 1,609,842 
.-- 1,609,842 
.-. 19,926,755 
.-. 19,926,755 
- - - 531,336 
. 531,336 
-... 119,300,184 
...- 119,300,184 
-- - 4,561,666 
-..- - 4,561,666 
13,161,000 12,226,000 10,098,218 5,886,000 493,260,690 
13,041,996 12,235,536 7,177,025 8,876,261 493,310,419 
20,817,284 20,729,000 22,138,031 21,127,900 383,046,535 2 
20,269,430 19,690,882 23,295,395 21,013,171 381,580,881 2 
2,171,734 4,769,009 
997,656 3,642,132 
8,000 
18,824 
239,000 
231,768 
86,900 
67,932 
- 247,625 
- 494,725 
917 
9,344 
5,723,348 
6,312,969 
- 531,336 
531,336 
- 313,817 
- 312,900 
86,900 
67,932 
5,069,974 
5,069,974 
28-14

LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 
TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1'2 
(Continued) 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
nlTae at Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept.O,1995 
18. Cato Spring, 
Fayetteville, AR 
19. Clearwater 
Lake, MO 
20. Crooked Creek, 
Harrison, AR 
DeQueen Lake, 
Little River 
Basin, AR 
Dierks Lake, 
Little River 
Basin, AR 
Dry Jordon Ck., 
Harrison, AR 
25. Fourche Bayou 
Basin, 
Little Rock, AR 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
958,200 
903,965 
1,010,000 
1,103,613 
972,225 1,059,275 17,633,323 2 
969,653 1,083,819 17,642,981 2 
18,305 
14,646 
15,960 
15,769 
34,265 
30,415 
- 11,132,503 1 
- 11,123,277 1 
1,943,600 
1,763,943 
60,000 
64,553 
1,810,800 2,078,019 1,753,400 35,794,719 
1,916,004 1,960,593 1,930,001 36,005,526 
11,467,910 
11,468,164 
2
2 
- 933,000 
S- 933,000 
_ 312,000 312,000 
312,000 312,000 
19,629,753 
19,623,752 
946,300 
952,856 
949,300 
1,001,592 
2,417,000 
4,543,525 
1,015,000 1,103,515 
953,532 1,162,626 
1,020,000 
871,176 
1,113,000 
2,101,900 
1,018,549 
974,656 
949,642 
730,921 
400,000 
916,139 13,050,855 2 
900,066 13,011,692 l 
16,002,904 
16,002,781 
1,046,380 
1,208,048 
13,465972 
13,385,842 
- 20,829,642 
20,714,724 
- 1.731.678 
28-15 
22. 
23. 
21.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT1'2 
(Continued) 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept.30,1995 
26. Gillham Lake, 
Little River 
Basin, AR 
29. Mill Creek, Fort 
Smith, AR 
30. Millwood Lake, 
Little River 
Basin, AR 
31. Nimrod Lake, 
AR 
33. White River 
Basin, AR &MO 
(Little Rock 
District) 
34. White River 
Batesville, AR 
35. Beaver Lake, 
AR 
-- Beaver Lake 
Water Quality 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Appropr. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib.. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
359,064 
904,400 
970,716 
1,113,425 
178,223 
989,000 
904,179 
43,210 
1,703,868 
S 17,827,111 
S 17,826,703 
949,357 
963,402 
54,672 
50,668 
79,360 
15,055 
745,339 12,385,339 2 
815,125 12,336,786 2 
257,029 4,603,001 2 
252,235 4,462,625 2 
4,003 
13,301 
S. 87,900 
_-_. 87,900 
1,668,300 1,775,800 1,954,432 
1,845,500 1,592,130 1,989,532 
1,285,000 1,310,000 
1,146,947 1,301,542 
1,411,325 
1,502,194 
584,655 
512,276 
_ 46,175,218 
46,179,148 
1,842,133 34,315,543 2 
1,935,814 34,483,879 2 
_ 4,092,826 
4,005,627 
1,238,333 21,828,875 
1,302,071 21,836,374 
S_ 435,000 347,330,302 
-. 2,408,684 346,376,821 
23,286,600 22,073,200 11,678,429 22,544,564 407,730,815' 
22,575,704 21,752,243 10,998,155 24,257,381 409,783,820 
85,000 
47,302 
35,000 
50,193 
13,257 
24,997 
238,907 
128,928 
184,472 
_ 33,524 
_ 9,653,000 
_ 9,542,098 12,505 
3,657,000 4,145,000 4,384,797 
3,841,602 3,114,427 4,828,265 
2,092,000 
1,834,472 
- 12,835,941 
841,972 11,671,238 
1,000,000 1,582,000 
1,025,263 1,015,847 
315,369 
315,369 
387,881 
387,881 
547,427 
648,939 
261,077 
261,077 
718,864 
598,123 
184,472 
33,524 
1,702,700 55,836,033 
2,086,195 55,666,678 
3,985,576 64,469,071 
3,924,452 63,036,507 
4,301,316 24,152,977 
5,304,009 23,951,461 
S 4,485,427 
1,167,202 4,066,856 
378,685 1,673,000 
378,685 1,673,000 
28-16

LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 
TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT, 2 
(Continued) 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept.30,1995 
-- Beaver Lake 
Infrastructure 
36. Bull Shoals 
Lake, AR 
37. Dardanelle Lock 
& Dam (No. 10) 
AR 
38. Greers Ferry 
Lake, AR 
39. Norfork Lake, 
AR 
40. Ozark-Jeta Taylor 
Lock & Dam 
(No.12), AR 
41. Table Rock 
Lake, MO 
44. Nimrod Waterfowl 
Levee 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
- 3,000,000 
- 10,280 
4,299,000 4,913,000 
4,287,539 4,479,216 
2,989,720 
11,817 
3,000,000 
22,097 
- - 88,858,711 
- - 88,858,707 
5,710,009 4,506,498 99,213,816 a 
5,368,532 4,323,288 98,653,322 2 
- 84,270,124 
- 84,261,240 
6,132,000 4,804,000 
6,021,095 5,251,657 
S 540,000 
S 358,259 
5,122,000 4,691,000 
4,920,459 5,127,157 
3,094,000 3,242,000 
3,191,017 3,126,440 
3,577,000 3,449,000 
3,350,848 3,586,114 
5,171,000 5,082,200 
4,571,144 5,063,031 
5,921,892 5,480,498 88,293,1492 
5,626,836 5,765,881 88,296,086 2 
1,279,741 888,303 2,708,044 
332,238 1,375,065 2,058,562 
- -- 48,865,512 
- -- 48,865,512 
5,010,074 4,770,080 83,855,3492 
5,175,303 4,622,640 83,299,537 
S- 70,701,628 
S- 70,701,628 
2 4,012,349 3,897,027 69,154,480 2 
3,584,566 4,383,323 69,138,423 2 
- 85,629,412 
- 85,629,412 
3,944,092 3,344,348 68,949,837 
3,906,943 3,491.398 68,729,152 
_ - 67,224,000 
_ - 67,224,000 
6,252,102 5,385,384 
5,785,817 6,241,137 
- 37,000 
- 17,153 
2 94,843,266 
94,325,5382 
37,000 
17,153 
28-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1'2 
(Continued) 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept.30,1995i 
45. Morgan Point 
Bendway Closure 
Structure, 
Arkansas River 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
10,000 
10,000 
5,000 5,000 
15,000 
1. For more details on project funds, see text for Individual projects. 
2. Beginning data shown In Table 28-A Includes special recreation use fees. 
3. Includes funds for plans and specifications. 
4. Includes total project cost, Includng study cost. 
28-18

LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 
TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Date of 
Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
June 28, 1938 
August 18, 1941 
July 24, 1946 
July 24, 1946 
June 30, 1948 
May 17, 1950 
ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, & KS 
(See Section 1 of text) 
Approved General comprehensive plan: 
Mannford Reservoir, OK 
Oologah Lake, OK 
Canton Lake, OK 
Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK 
Wister Lake, OK 
Blue Mountain Lake, AR 
Nimrod Lake, AR 
Modified comprehensive plan to include reservoirs in 
Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK, and Mo, and in 
Verdigris River Basin: 
Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK 
Fort Gibson Lake, OK 
Pensacola Reservoir Lake O' The Cherokees, OK 
Fall River Lake, KS 
Elk City Lake, KS 
Toronto Lake, KS 
Neodosha Lake, KS 
Authorized Chief of Engineers to provide in the Canton 
Lake 69,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage, subject to 
certain conditions. 
Approved multiple-purpose plan: 
Oologah Lake, OK 
Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK 
Fort Gibson Lake, OK 
Blackburn Reservoir, OK 
Mannford Reservoir, OK 
Taft Reservoir, OK 
Bank stabilization 
Dardanelle Lock and Dam, AR 
Eufaula Lake, OK 
Navigation locks and dams 
Ozark Lock and Dam, AR 
Short Mountain Lock and Dam, OK 
Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK 
Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK 
Modified Arkansas River navigation comprehensive plan to 
include bank protection works at Bradens Bend, OK. 
Modified comprehensive plan authorized in 1938 Flood 
Control Act and multiple-purpose plan authorized in 
River and Harbor Act of 1946 to provide for substituting 
Keystone Lake for Mannford, Blackburn and Taft 
Reservoirs. 
28-19 
Flood Control Conm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 107 and 440, 
76th Cong. 1st sess. 
H. Doc 758, 79th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc 758, 79th Cong., 
2d sess. 
S. Doc 107, 81st Cong., 
1st sess.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 28-B 
(Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Date of 
Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
July 14, 1960 
July 14, 1960 
Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood 
Control plans into a single plan of development and made 
Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood 
Control plans into a single plan of development and made 
all pervious authorizations applicable to combined 
plan of development. 
November 17, 1986 
June 10, 1948 
July 24, 1946 
July 3, 1958 
July 24, 1946 
July 24, 1946 
Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR 
(See Section 22 of text.) 
Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR 
(See Section 27 of text.) 
RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM INCLUDING 
LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OK AND AR 
(See Section 26 of text) 
Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank 
Stabilization. 
Modified Millwood: Construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, 
Broken Bow, DeQueen, Gillham, Dierks Lakes 
Emergency streambank erosion protection, Red River, Little River 
Co., AR 
Emergency streambank erosion protection, Red River, Little River 
Co., AR 
Water Resources 
Development Act of 
1986, P.L. 99-662, 
Sec. 401. 
Section 205, P.L. 80-858. 
Authorized by Asst. Sec. of 
the Army (CW), 10/14/88. 
H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc. 170, 85th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Section 14, PL 79-526 
Section 14, PL 79-526 
WHITE RIVER BASIN 
(LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) 
(See Section 33 of text) 
June 28, 1938 
August 18, 1941 
September 3, 1954 
October 23, 1962 
Approved comprehensive plan for White River Basin: 
Lone Rock Lake, AR, Norfork Lake, AR, 
Clearwater Lake, MO, Water Valley Lake, AR, 
Bell Foley Lake, AR, Greers Ferry Lake, AR, 
and White River emergency. 
Modified comprehensive plan to include Bull Shoals 
Lake, AR, and MO, Table Rock Lake, MO, and 
AR, and Norfork Lake, AR, and MO (power). 
Authorized power in Greers Ferry Reservoir and added 
Beaver Lake to the plan. 
Authorizing clearing and straightening of channel for 
Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties. 
Flood Control Cornm. 
Doc 1, 75th Cong.,lst sess. 
H. Doc. 917, 76th Cong., 
3d sess. 
H. Doc. 290, 77th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 499, 83d Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc 352, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
28-20

LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 
TABLE 28-B 
(Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Date of 
Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
March 1, 1974 
May 11, 1962 
October 22, 1976 
June 30, 1948 
Authorizing highway bridge construction across 
Norfork Lake. 
Environmental restoration of wetlands and fish and wildlife 
resources in the White River Basin, AR and MO. (See Section 33 
of text.) 
White River Fish Hatchery, Arkansas provides for 
trout production facilities downstream from 
Beaver Dam. 
White River, Batesville, AR. 
(See Section 34 of text.) 
Flood Control Cornm. 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st sess. 
SenateReport 102-344;Energyand 
Water Development Appropriations 
Act, 1993, PL 102-377. 
WaterResources DevelopmentAct 
of 1976, P.L. 94-587, Sec. 105. 
Section 205, PL. 80-858, construction 
to be approved by ASA 
(CW). 
28-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 28-c OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Federal Cost thru Sept. 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Report For Construction Maintenance 
Arkansas River, Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, AR ' 1988 $736,869 
Black River, AR and MO 2 1950 80,000 $ 930,324 
Current River, AR and MO 2 1964 17,000' 132,178 
Upper White River, AR 4' 1952 813,197 1,788,374 
White River, AR (above Peach Orchard Bluff) 2 1950 _ 785,666 
1984 43,110 
White River, Jacksonpo AR 
1. Completed. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 
107,1960 R& H Act, as amended, (P.L86-645). 
2. Channel adequate for existing commerce; completion not contemplated. 
3. Includes $7,000 for previous project. 
4. Federal operation and maintenance terminated June 30,1952, due to 
lack of commerce. Facilities at Locks and Dams Nos. 1,2, and 3 dsposed 
of in accordance with authority in Public Law 996, 84th Congress. 
5. Completed. 
6. Responsibility for maintenance of project downstream from Newport, AR; 
transferred to Memphis District in FY 62. 
28-22

LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 
TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operations and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Bell Foley Lake, White River, AR' 
Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO 
Black River, Poplar Bluff, MO, to 
Knobel, AR 
Butler County Drainage District 3, MO 
Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, 
Arkansas River, AR 
Cato Springs, Fayetteville, AR 
Clarksville, AR 
Conway County Drainage and Levee District 
District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR 
Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 
2, and 8, Arkansas River, AR 
Conway County Levee District No. 6, 
Arkansas River, AR 
Crawford County Levee District, AR 
Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas 
River, AR 
Crooked Creek, Harrison, AR 
Curia Creek Drainage District, 
Independence County, AR 
East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO 
Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, 
Arkansas River, AR 
Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR 
From North Little Rock to Gillett, AR 
(above Plum Bayou) 
Fourche Creek, Little Rock, ARC 
Jackson Couinty Levee District 2, 
White River, AR 
Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR 
Little Red River District 1, AR 
Little Red River, White County Road 
Bridge, Judsonia, AR 
Little Rock Levee, AR, East End 
Fourche Bayou, AR 
McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, 
Arkansas River, AR 
Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR 
Newport, White River, AR 
North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR 
Otter Creek and Tributaries, 
Shannon Hills, AR 
Petit Jean River, AR 
Petit Jean River, AR 
Pine Mountain Lake, AR' 
Point Remove Levee and Drainage 
District, Conway County, AR 
Red River, !-30, Little River Co., AR 
Red River, Hwy. 31, Little River Co., AR 
Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, AR 
Rolling Fork River, Sevier Coiunty, AR 
aCulet 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Under Const. 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Cancelled 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Inactive 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed
28-23 
171, 
1985 
1958 
1983 
1951 
1995 
1962 
1959 
1952 
1952 
1983 
1954 
1995 
1983 
.1958 
1941 
1951 
1954 
1973 
1986 
1983 
1988 
1983 
1975 
1950 
1953 
1941 
1958 
1987 
1966 
1991 
1985 
1983 
1992 
1992 
1950 
1983 
44,500 
84,315 
42,172 
919,955 
426,000 
271,717 
187,440 
1,018,840 
390,952 
53,506 
2,001,820 
1,245,000 
117,898 
304,699 
99,511 
1,077,546 
845,300 
22,890 
131,699 
198,096 
28,968 
63,355 
1,901,899 
422,549 
198,069 
314,276 
512,001 
162,204 
84,350 
88,379 
1,432,331 
86,943 
119,897 
144,828 
269,907 
64,500 
Tn anti vP 1 7 t1 )1 
28-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 28-E 
(Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operations and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR Completed 1941 81,023 - 
South Bank, Arkansas River (Head Fourche 
Island to Pennington Bayou), AR Completed 1964 1,404,852 - 
South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to 
Pine Bluff, AR, Tucker Lakes Completed 1961 409,115 - 
Swan Creek Bank Stab., Taney County, MO Completed 1986 76,800 - 
Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 438,222 - 
Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry 
Levee Districts, AR4 Completed 1972 1,567,156 - 
Village Creek, Jackson and 
Lawrence Counties, AR5 Inactive 1977 510,217 - 
West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1962 1,269,959 - 
White River, at Hwy 14, 1/4 mile east 
of Oil Trough, AR Completed 1981 214,308 - 
White River Bank Stab., Batesville, AR Completed 1986 101,100 - 
White River, Jacksonport, AR' Completed 1987 293,567 - 
White River, Newport, AR Completed 1989 93,929 - 
White River, St. Paul, AR Completed 1990 22,400 - 
1. Reclassified asinactiveinJun '77; reviewed & deferred in May'85; 4. See H Doc 577,87th Cong for description. 
funded for reevaluation (draft report dated Sep '89). 5. Reclassified in Jun '77; local Interests unable to meet local coop- 
2. Construction of project cancelled because local nterests failed to eration requirements; funded for reevaluation in FY 89; recommended 
provide right-of-way for construction and maintenance, to be placed in the Inactive status. 
3. Reclassified as inactive in Jul '85. 6. Design deficiency correction to be completed 30 December 1996. 
TABLE 28-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last Funds Expended 
Full Report 
See Annual Date Federal Contributed 
Project Report For Authority Deauthorized Funds Funds 
Crooked Creek Lake 
& Levee, AR 1969 1990 
Lone Rock, Buffalo 
River, AR 1959 1977 $130,653 
Prosperity Lake, MO 1989 864,000 
Water Valley, Eleven 
Point River, AR & MO 1959 1977 414,011 
28-24

TABLE 28-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
NAVIGATION 
Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year 
Up- Upper Miter Sill acter Opened 
stream Lock Pool of to 
from Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- Kind of Type of Naviga- 
Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion Dam Construction tion 
LITTLE ROCK 
DISTRICT 
Norrell Lock and 
Dam No.l1 
Entrance Channel 
8 east of Arkansas 
Post, AR 
110 by 600 30 max 142 16 15 
Total 
Estimated 
Cost 
1967 $22,472,000 
_ 43,649,000 
1967 70,266,000 
First 10.3 miles of system 
Lock No.2 6 east of Arkansas 
Post, AR 
Wilbur D. Mills Dam 
(No. 2) 
110 by 600 20nom 
28 max 
162 18 14 
3 southeast Arkansas 
Post, AR 
1968 
Joe Hardin Lock and 
Dam No. 3 
Emmett Sanders Lock 
and Dam (No. 4) 
Lock and Dam No. 5 
David D. Terry Lock 
and Dam (No. 6) 
5 north of Grady, AR 
7 east of Pine Bluff, 
AR 
4 southeast of 
Redfield, AR 
12 southeast of Little 
Rock, AR 
110 by 600 20 182 
110 by 600 14 196 
110 by 600 17 213 
llO by 600 18 231 
18 14 
18 14 
18 14 
18 14 
1968 38,040,000 
1968 45,246,000 
1968 31,710,000 
1968 69,086,000 
N% 
00 
NA 
0
0
d~I

TABLE 28-H 
(Continued) 
ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year 
Up- Upper Miter Sill acter Opened 
stream Lock Pool of to 
from Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- Kind of Type of Naviga- 
Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion Dam Construction tion 
Murray Lock and Dam 
(No.7) 
Toad Suck Ferry 
Lock and Dam 
(No. 8) 
Arthur V. Ormond 
Lock and Dam 
(No. 9) 
Dardanelle 
Lock and Dam 
(No. 10) 
Lock and Dam No. 11 
Ozark-Jeta Taylor 
Lock and Dam 
(No. 12) 
James W. Trimble 
Lock and Dam 
(No. 13) 
6 northwest of Little 
Rock, AR 
6 west of Conway, AR 
3 southwest of 
Morrilton, AR 
2 northwest of 
Dardanelle, AR 
110 by 600 
110 by 600 
18 249 
16 265 
110 by 600 19 284 
110 by 600 54 338 
18 14 
18 
1969 $46,076,000 
14 1969 57,831,000 
18 14 1969 37,798,000 
18 14 1969 84,270,124 
Deleted 
1 east of Ozark, AR 
7 east of Fort Smith, 
AR 
110 by 600 34 372 
110 by 600 20 392 
18 
18 
15 1969 85,629,412 
14 1969 58,816,000 
Total 
Estimated 
Cost 
b
C
C
xT 
x
z
C
r
0
xT 
'T0

TABLE 28-H 
(Continued) 
ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
NAVIGATION 
Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year 
Up- Upper Miter Sill acter Opened 
stream Lock Pool of to 
from Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- Kind of Type of Naviga- 
Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion Dam Construction tion 
TULSA DISTRICT3 
James W. Trimble 
Lock and Dam 
(No. 13) (part) 
W.D. Mayo Lock 
and Dam (No. 14) 
Robert S. Kerr Lock 
and Dam (No. 15) 
Webbers Falls Lock 
and Dam (No. 16) 
Chouteau Lock and 
Dam (No. 17) 
Newt Graham Lock 
and Dam (No. 18) 
1970 $6,858,000 
4 east of Redland, 
OK 
1 north of Cowlington, 
OK 
1 northwest of Gore, 
OK 
4 northwest of Okay, 
OK 
8 southwest of Inola, 
OK 
110 by 600 20 412 
110 by 600 48 460 
110 by 600 30 490 
14 15 
18 14 
19 16 
110 by 600 21 511 15 14 
110 by 600 21 532 
1970 32,655,000 
1970 94,578,237 
1970 83,738,277 
1970 31,619,000 
15 14 1970 44,355,000 
Total 
Estimated 
Cost 
0 
N
04 
N
J

TABLE 28-H 
(Continued) 
ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
Additional features entering into cost of project 
Little Rock District: 
Bank stabilization and channel rectification, mile 33.7 to 362 and 
Arkansas-White Cutoff, 100 percent complete ............ $119,300,184 
Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, 
complete................................ 10,247,000 
Total, Little Rock District........................ 814,362,720 
Navigation aids (U.S. Coast Guard) ....................... 2,268,000 
Tulsa District: 
Bank stabilization and channel rectification, Short Mountain 
to Fort Smith, complete............................. 12,700,038 
Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, 
complete....................................... 2,750,000 
Subtotal........................................ $309,253,552 
Upstream Lakes:2 
Oologah, 90.2 miles upstream from mouth, Verdigris River 
complete ..................................... $ 46,722,329 
Keystone, 638.8 miles upstream from mouth, Arkansas River, 
complete.........................................123,170,773 
Eufaula, 27 miles upstream from mouth, Canadian River, 
complete........................................ 124,130,747 
Subtotal ....................................... 294,023,849 
Total, Tulsa District.......................... 603,277,401 
Total Project Cost 96 percent complete..........$1,419,908,121 
1. Navigation mileage from mouth of White River. except Dam No. 2. is 40.5 miles above mouth of Arkansas River. 
2. Details In Tulsa District report. 
0
C
-I1 
'TI. 
0
'I 
0

(See Section 1 of Text) 
Miles Drainage Height Reservoir Power Year or 
Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Percent 
Lake and State River Month Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Complete 
Blue Mountain, AR Petit Jean 74.4 Paris, AR 488 115 Earthfill 257,900 - 1947 $ 
Canton, OK North Canadian 384.3 Canton, OK 12,483 68 Earthfill 383,300 - 1948 1 
Elk City, KS Elk 8.7 Independence, KS 634 107 Earthfill 284,300 - 1966 1 
(Table Mound) 
Eufaula, OK 12 Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK 47,522 114 Earthfill 3,798,000 90,000 1964 12 
Fall River, KS Fall 54.2 Fall River, KS 585 94 Earthfill 256,400 - 1949 1 
Fort Gibson, OK' Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK 12,492 110 Concrete- 1,284,400 45,000 1953 4 
Keystone, OK '" Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK 74,506 121 gravity 1,836,500 70,000 1964 12 
Markham Ferry, OK" Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Pryor, OK 11,533 90 Eartfill 444,500 100,000 1968 
Neodesha, KS' Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS 1,152 74 Earthfill 90,000 - 0 
Nimrod, AR Fourche La Fave 62.6 Plainview, AR 680 103 Earthfill 336,010 _ 1942 
Oologah, OK' Verdigris 90.2 Claremore, OK 4,339 137 Concrete- 1,519,000 1974 
Pensacola, OK' Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK 10,298 147 gravity 2,197,000 86,400 1940 
Tenkiller Ferry, OK" Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK 1,610 197 Earthfill 1.230,800 34,000 1953 
Toronto, KS Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS 730 90 Concrete arch 199,700 - 1960 
Wister, OK Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK 993 99 Earthfill 427,900 _ 1949 
Subtotal, exclusive of Eufaula, Keystone, and Oologah. 1 
Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK and KS: Navigation (Table 28-H). 1,4 
Total, Arkansas River Basin, 96 percent complete. 1, 
Total 
Estimated 
Cost 
5,069,974 
.1,209,834 
9,052,990 
23,350,791 
10,550,873 
12,591,298 
13,171,173 
6,908,756 
97,910 
4,092,826 
16,722,329 
52,126 
24,017,724 
13,896,324 
10,501,226 
148,041,861 
119,908,121 
567,949,982 
1. Project Includes faocNtes for production of hydroelectric power. 
2. Cost Included In navigation project. 
3. Detals In Tulsa District report. 
4. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name of Robert S. Kerr Dam (Lake Hudson). Estimate shown Is for Federal participatilon 
5. Inactive. Estimate b based on 1954 price levels. 
6. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name Grand River Dam (Lake OThe Cherokees). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 
N) 
00 
N) 
I 
Table 28-1 ARKANSAS RIVER BABSIN; AR, OK, AND S: LAKES

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 28-J LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR: LAKES 
(See Section 26 of Text) 
Project River Site' Nearest Town 
DeQueen Lake' Rolling Fork River 22.8 DeQueen, AR 
Gillham Lake' Cossatot River 49.0 Gillham, AR 
Dierks Lake' Saline River 56.6 Dierks, AR 
Millwood Lake' Little River 16.0 Millwood, AR 
1. Project is reported separately herein. 
28-30

WHITE RIVER BASIN; AR, AND MO: LAKES 
TABLE 28-K (See Section 34 of text) 
Miles Drainage Reservoir Power 
Above Area Height of Dam Above Streambed Capacity Development 
Lake River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) and Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) 
Beaver' White 609.0 Eureka Springs, AR 1,186 228 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 1,952,000 112,000 
Bell Foley2 Strawberry 27.2 Poughkeepsie, AR 519 136 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 518,000 
Bull Shoals' White 418.6 Mountain Home, AR 6,036 258 feet concrete-gravity 5,408,000 340,000 
Clearwater' Black 257.4 Piedmont, MO 898 154 feet earthfill 413,000 
Greers Ferry' Little Red 79.0 Heber Springs, AR 1,146 243 feet concrete-gravity 1,844,000 96,000 
Norfork' North Fork 4.8 Norfork, AR 1,806 216 feet concrete-gravity 1,983,000 80,550 
Table Rock' White 523.8 Branson, MO 4,020 252 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 3,462,000 200.000 
Total 15,580,000 828,550 
1. For details see individual reports. 
2. Inactive--placed in a deferred status in May 1985. Estimate based on 1983 price levels. 
Total 
Estimated 
Cost' 
$ 52,631,472 
93,700,000 
96,356,000 
22,462,553 
55,125,000 
111,624,000 
71,233,000 
503,069,472 
E" 
t" 
O
7b 
3
yb 
y) 
r3

TULSA, OKLAHOMA,DISTRICT *
TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 
The civil works boundry of the Tulsa District includes 
an area of approximately 160,000 square miles covering 
Oklahoma and parts of Kansas and Texas within 
the Arkansas and Red River Basins. The District's 
responsibilities within the Arkansas River Basin cover 
southern Kansas, northern Oklahoma, and the Texas 
Panhandle. These areas are included in the drainage 
basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above 
the mouth of the Poteau River, extending to the Kansas- 
Colorado State line, exclusive of that portion of the South 
Canadian River Basin and its tributaries west of the 
Texas-New Mexico State line. The District's responsibilities 
within the Red River Basin cover the northern 
portion of Texas, and the southern portion of Oklahoma. 
These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the 
Red River and its tributaries above Index, Arkansas. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River 
Navigation System, OK 
2. Other Authorized Navigation Projects 
Flood Control 
3. Arcadia Lake, OK 
4. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride 
Control Projects, KS, OK, and TX 
4a. Area V, Estelline Springs, TX 
4b. Area VIII, TX 
4c. Red River Basin Chloride 
Control, TX & OK 
5. Birch Lake, OK 
6. Candy Lake, OK 
7. Canton Lake, OK 
8. Copan Lake, OK 
9. Council Grove Lake, KS 
10. El Dorado Lake, KS 
11. Elk CityLake, KS 
12. Fall River Lake, KS 
13. Fort Supply Lake, OK 
14. Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK 
15. Great Bend, KS 
16. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK 
17. Halstead, KS 
18. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK 
19. Hugo Lake, OK 
20. Hulah Lake, OK 
29-2 21. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS 
29-2 22. Kaw Lake, OK 
23. Lake Kemp, TX 
24. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX 
25. Marion Reservoir, KS 
29-2 26. McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX 
27. Mingo Creek, OK 
29-3 28. Oologah Lake, OK 
29-3 29. Optima Lake, OK 
29-3 30. Parker Lake, OK 
31. Pat Mayse Lake, TX 
29-4 32. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 
29-4 33. Pine Creek Lake, TX 
29-4 34. Sardis Lake, OK 
29-4 35. Skiatook Lake, OK 
29-4 36. Toronto Lake, KS 
29-5 87. Tulsa & West Tulsa, OK 
29-5 38. Waurika Lake, OK 
29-5 39. Wister Lake, OK 
29-5 40. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 
29-5 41. Inspection of Completed Local 
29.5 Flood Protection Projects 
29-6 42. Scheduling Flood Control 
29-6 Reservoir Operations 
29-6 43. Emergency Flood Control Activities 
29-6 44. Flood Control Work Under 
29-7 SpecialAuthorization 
29-1 
29-7 
29-7 
29-7 
29-7 
29-7 
29-8 
29-8 
29-8 
29-8 
29-9 
29-9 
29-9 
29-9 
29-9 
29-9 
29-10 
29-10 
29-10 
29-10 
29-11 
29-11 
29-11 
29-11 
29-11 
29-11 
29-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FORFY 1995 
Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Tables 
Broken Bow Lake, OK 
Eufaula Lake, OK 
Fort Gibson Lake, OK 
Keystone Lake, OK 
Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK & TX 
Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam 
and Reservoir, OK 
Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK 
Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK 
29-11 
29-11 
29-12 
29-12 
29-12 
29-12 
29-12 
29-12 
General Investigations 
Surveys 
Collection and Study of Basic Data 
Preconstruction Engineering and Design 
29-13 
29-13 
29-13 
29-A Cost and Financial Statement 
29-B Authorizing Legislation 
29-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 
29-D Not Applicable 
29-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 
29-F Not Applicable 
29-G Deauthorized Projects 
29-HArkansas River Basin 
Multiple-Purpose Plan 
29-I Inspection of Completed Local 
Flood Protection Projects 
29-J Flood Control Work Under 
Special Authorization 
29-K General Investigations 
Navigation 
1. McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS 
RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM 
(Tulsa District Portion), OK. 
Location. The Tulsa District portion of the 
McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System 
provides a navigation route up the Arkansas River 
from the Oklahoma-Arkansas State line to the head of 
navigation at Catoosa, OK, near Tulsa, OK. The total 
length of the Tulsa District portion of the system is 
137 navigation miles. Descriptions and costs for 
the entire navigation system can be found in Little 
Rock District's entry in this Annual Report. 
Existing projects. The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas 
River navigation project is a component of the multiplepurpose 
plan for the Arkansas River Basin which provides 
for the improvement of the basin through the 
construction of coordinated developments for navigation, 
hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, 
water quality control, sediment control, recreation, and 
fish and wildlife propagation. The McClellan-Kerr project 
also includes of bank stabilization, channel straightening, 
and cutoffs as required. The navigation channel has 
a minimum depth of 9 feet and minimum widths of 250 
feet on the Arkansas River and 150 feet on the Verdigris 
River. The Tulsa District portion of the navigation 
system consists of Arkansas River Bank Stabilization 
and Channel Rectification, Chouteau Lock and Dam, 
Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Robert S. Kerr Lock and 
Dam and Reservoir, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, 
Sans Bois Navigation Channel, W.D. Mayo Lock and 
Dam, Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, and the pool in 
Oklahoma which was created by Lock and Dam 13 in 
Arkansas. The other parts of the multiple-purpose plan 
for the Arkansas River Basin are listed in Table 29-H. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in 
operation at Muskogee and Catoosa, OK, and at Fort 
Smith, AR. At Sallisaw, OK, a port authority has been 
active in seeking development of public facilities at that 
location. Other private commercial port facilities are 
complete and in operation at eight Oklahoma locations. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
2. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION 
PROJECTS. 
See Table 29-C. 
Flood Control 
3. ARCADIA LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the Deep Fork River, at river 
mile 218.3, in the metropolitan area of Oklahoma 
City and Edmond, OK, about 1.5 miles west of 
Arcadia, in Oklahoma County, OK. (See Arcadia, OK, 
Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. The plan of improvement 
provides for flood control, water supply, and recreation 
by construction of an earthfill dam approximately 
102 feet high and 5,250 feet long with a high-level 
29-2 
45. 
46. 
47. 
48. 
49. 
50. 
51. 
52. 
53. 
54. 
55. 
29-14 
29-23 
29-25 
29-26 
29-27 
29-27 
29-28 
29-28 
29-29

TULSA,OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 
uncontrolled spillway. Outlet works consist of a 
gated tower and conduit. The lake has a total capacity 
of 92,000 acre-feet (27,380 for conservation, 64,430 
for flood control, and 190 for sedimentation reserve), 
and controls a 105-square-mile drainage area. Construction 
began in October 1980, and the project became 
operational for flood control in November 1986. 
Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, the Federal 
Water Project Recreation Act of 1965, and Section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. The United 
States filed suit to seek enforcement of the 
local cooperation requirements and the issue was mutually 
resolved by a Consent Decree entered into 
CIV 89-1507-A in United States District Court for 
the Western District of Oklahoma on February 10, 1992. 
The decree was for the City of Edmond and the 
Edmond Public Works Authority to reimburse the Government 
$7,207,636 over a period of 40 years for 
the Recreation contract and $16,253,644 for the water 
supply contract over a period of 43 years. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
4. ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS 
CHLORIDE CONTROL PROJECTS, 
KS, OK, AND TX. 
Location. On certain tributary streams of the Arkansas 
and Red Rivers in the western half of the Tulsa 
District. 
Existing project. The project was initiated as 
a result of studies involving the control of water 
pollution caused by 15 natural salt sources identified 
in 1957 by the U.S. Public Health Service. The 
Arkansas and Red Rivers are major national and 
regional water resources which are severely limited 
due to poor water quality primarily caused by the 
natural pollutant, sodium chloride. The Arkansas 
River is polluted by five naturally occurring salt 
sources located in northwestern Oklahoma and 
southwestern Kansas. The Red River Basin is polluted 
by 10 naturally occurring salt sources located in 
northwestern Texas, and southwestern Oklahoma. 
Preliminary Feasibility Studies included the construction 
and subsequent maintenance of an injection 
well and a ring dike used for data collection. 
Preauthorization studies completed in 1966 and 
1970 recommended construction of project features 
at 13 of the 15 chloride emission areas. For a detailed 
discussion of the chloride control projects, see 
page 19-4 of the Annual Report for 1983. The 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) 
authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas 
River Basin as separate projects with separate authority 
under Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966. 
The Arkansas River portion of the project was 
deferred in 1982 (not economically justified). 
4a. AREA V, ESTELLINE SPRINGS, TX. 
Location. Chloride Control Area V is located 
about 0.5 mile east of Estelline, TX, on the Prairie Dog 
Town Fork of the Red River. 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see the AnnualReportfor 1987. Construction 
started in 1963, and the structure was completed 
in 1964. 
Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local 
cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of 
the Annual Report for 1983. 
4b. AREA VIII, TX. 
Location. Chloride Control Area VIII is located at 
river mile 74.9, of the South Fork of the Wichita River, in 
King County, TX, about 5 miles east of Guthrie, TX. 
Existing project. The plan of improvement consists 
of a low-flow brine collection dam (the Bateman Low 
Flow Dam) with attendant pumping station and pipeline 
facilities. The collected brine is pumped to the storage 
reservoir behind the Truscott Brine Dam. This brine 
dam, located at river mile 3.6 on Bluff Creek (a tributary 
of the North Fork of the Wichita River) about 3 miles 
northwest of Truscott, TX, contains collected brine from 
Area VIII and will contain brine collected in the future 
from Area X. Construction was initiated at Area VIII and 
Truscott Brine Dam in 1976. The Bateman low-flow dam 
was completed and put into full operation in May 1987. 
Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning 
local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 
of the Annual Report for 1983. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized 
construction of the remaining components of 
the Red River Chloride Control project pending report 
ofa favorable finding of the effectiveness of the operation 
of Area VIII. Public Law 99-662 established a panel 
to assess the improvement in water quality downstream 
of Area VIII as a measure of its effectiveness. 
A favorable report was submitted by the panel to 
the Secretary of the Army (CW) and to the Public Works 
Committees of the House and Senate in August 1988. 
29-3

REPORT OFTHESECRETARYOFTHEARMYONCIVILWORKSACTIVITIESFORFY1995 
4c. RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE 
CONTROL, TX & OK. 
Location. The project is located in Cottle, Hall, 
and King Counties, TX, and Harmon County, OK, 
along the Wichita and Red Rivers. Area VI is located 
on the Elm Fork of the Red River in Harmon County, 
OK; Area VII is on the North Fork of the Wichita 
River, Cottle County, TX; Crowell Brine Dam is on Canal 
Creek, a tributary of the Pease River; Area IX is on 
the Middle Pease River, Cottle County, TX; Area X is 
on the Middle Fork of the Wichita River, King County, 
TX; and Areas XIII-XIV are on the Jonah and Salt 
Creeks of Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River, Hall 
County, TX. 
Existing project. The plan of improvement consists 
of one deep-well injection system, 3 brine storage 
reservoirs, 4 low-flow brine collection dams, 2 well collection 
facilities, 6 pumping plants, and 56.3 miles of pipeline. 
Construction was completed at the Area X, low-flow 
dam, pump station and access road in March 1994. A 
Limited Reevaluation Report containing a project economic 
reevaluation was approved in November 1993. 
Local Cooperation. Section 1107 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the project 
at full Federal expense. The Red River Authority of 
Texas has signed a 221 Agreement as the non-Federal 
sponsor. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. 
Estimated cost of the project is $225,000,000 (October 
1995 price level base). Design is underway for all 
Areas. A supplement to the Final Environmental Impact 
Study is being prepared. 
5. BIRCH LAKE, OK. 
Location. On Birch Creek at river mile 0.8, about 1.5 
miles south of Barnsdall, in Osage County, OK. (See 
Barnsdall, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see the Annual Report for 1979. Construction 
began in November 1973, and the project was placed 
in useful operation in March 1977. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
6. CANDY LAKE, OK. 
Location. On Candy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek 
in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 1.9. The 
damsite is about 1.5 miles northeast of Avant in 
Osage County, OK. (See Avant, OK, Geological Survey 
map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. The plan of improvement provides 
for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long; including 
an uncontrolled concrete spillway, with a maximum 
height of 103 feet above the streambed. Outlet works 
will consist of a gated intake structure, a 10x11.25-foot 
conduit, and a stilling basin. An 18x24-inch low-flow 
pipe and an 18-inch water supply pipe will be 
provided. The lake will have a total capacity of 75,420 
acre-feet (44,160 for conservation and sediment 
reserve and 31,260 for flood control). The drainage 
area above the damsite is 43 square miles. Candy 
Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system 
for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in 
Oklahoma. Construction began in September 1976. 
Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, and 
Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, apply. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. The 
project was about 13 percent complete when construction 
was delayed because the U.S. Justice Department 
decided to withdraw condemnation proceedings to acquire 
mineral rights. Estimated cost of the project was 
$38,300,000 (October 1984 price level base). The project 
was deferred in January 1984. Project land has been 
made available for low intensity recreation use. Routine 
operation and maintenance continued. 
7. CANTON LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the North Canadian River at river 
mile 394, about 2 miles north of Canton in Blaine 
County, OK. (See Canton, OK, Geological Survey map, 
scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 590 of the Annual Report 
for 1969. Construction began in December 1940, 
and the project was placed in useful operation in April 
1948. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
8. COPAN LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the Little Caney River, a tributary 
of the Caney River, in the Verdigris River Basin, at 
river mile 7.4, about 2 miles west of Copan in 
Washington County, OK. (See Copan, KS, Geological 
Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
29-4

TULSA,OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report 
for 1983. Copan Lake is operated as a unit of a sevenlake 
system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin 
in Oklahoma. Construction began in November 1972, 
and the project was placed in useful operation in April 
1983. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
9. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS. 
Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 
450, about 1.5 miles northwest of Council Grove, in 
Morris County, KS. (See Council Grove Lake, KS, 
Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 519 of the Annual Report 
for 1969. Construction began in June 1959, and the 
project was placed in useful operation in July 1964. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
10. EL DORADO LAKE, KS. 
Location. On the Walnut River, a tributary of 
the Arkansas River, at river mile 100.2, about 4 miles 
northeast of El Dorado in Butler County, KS. (See 
El Dorado, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report 
for 1983. El Dorado Lake was authorized as a unit of a 
three-lake system for flood control in the Walnut 
River Basin. Construction began in October 1973, and 
impoundment began in June 1981. Project is complete. 
Local cooperation. Negotiations are currently 
underway with the Kansas Department of Wildlife and 
Parks to initiate payment to meet their obligation 
for recreation development. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
11. ELK CITY LAKE, KS. 
Location. On the Elk River at river mile 8.7, about 
7 miles northwest of Independence, in Montgomery 
County, KS. (See Table Mound, KS, Geological 
Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 593 of the Annual Report 
for 1969. Construction began in February 1962, and 
the project was placed in useful operation in March 1966. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
12. FALL RIVER LAKE, KS. 
Location. On the Fall River at river mile 54.2, 
about 4 miles northwest of Fall River, in Greenwood 
County, KS. (See Severy, KS, Geological Survey 
map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 953 of the Annual Report 
for 1969. Construction began in May 1946, and 
the project was placed in full operation in April 1949. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
13. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK. 
Location. On Wolf Creek, a tributary of the North 
Canadian River, at river mile 5.5, about 12 miles 
northwest of Woodward, in Woodward County, OK. 
(See Fort Supply, OK, Geological Survey Map, 
scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report 
for 1969. Construction began in October 1938, and 
the project was placed in full flood control operation 
in May 1942. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
14. FRY CREEKS, BIXBY, OK. 
Location. In the northern part of the city of Bixby, 
in Tulsa County, OK. 
Existing project. The project consists of enlarging 
both Fry Creeks, diverting Fry Creek 1 into 
29-5

REPORT OFTHE SECRETARYOFTHIEARMYONCIVIL, WORKSACTIVITIESFORFY 1995 
Fry Creek 2 and then diverting the combined 
creeks into the Arkansas River. The total length of 
the modified channels would total 4.3 miles, with 
bottom widths of 30 to 225 feet and depths of 6 to 12 
feet. Three bridges will be constructed and 20 
acres of land will be acquired for mitigation of fish 
and wildlife losses. 
Local Cooperation. The Project Cooperation 
Agreement was signed in January 1995. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Estimated cost of the project is $18,200,000 (October 
1995 price level base). Funds provided in FY 95 
were used to continue plans and specifications and 
complete Project Cooperation Agreement negotiations. 
15. GREAT BEND, KS. 
Location. In Barton County, KS, on the north bank 
of the Arkansas River about 4.5 miles above its 
confluence with Walnut Creek. (See Great Bend, 
KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. The plan, authorized by the 
Flood Control Act of 1965, provides for 6.2 miles of 
leveed channel to divert Walnut Creek flood flow around 
Great Bend into the Arkansas River upstream from 
the city; a 1.5-mile leveed channel to divert Little 
Walnut Creek flood flew into the Walnut Creek 
diversion levees along the Arkansas River; a tieback 
levee 4.3 miles long eon the Arkansas River left 
bank upstream from the junction of the Walnut 
diversion channel; and appurtenant facilities. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Estimated cost of the project is $36,350,000 (October 
1994 price level base). Work on Phase III was 
completed in June 1994. 
16. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the Salt Fork of the Arkansas River 
at river mile 103.3, about 12 miles east of Cherokee, 
in Alfalfa County, OK. (See Jet, OK, Geological 
Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completeed 
improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report 
for 1969. Construction of the project began in 
September 1938, and was completed in July 1941. The 
project was placed in full flood control operation in 
May 1941. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
17. HALSTEAD, KS. 
Location. In the city of Halstead, in Harvey 
County, KS, along the Arkansas River. (See Halstead, 
KS, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. Provides for channel modification 
and construction of about 4 miles of levee 
in combination with straightening and widening 
approximately 3.6 miles of the Little Arkansas River 
channel to a 50-foot-bottom width in the vicinity 
of Halstead. Channel modification will be restricted 
to one side of the channel except in transition 
areas. Tree planting and revegetation will be done 
and ten pool riffle areas will be established to minimize 
environmental impacts. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Funds provided in FY 93 were used to continue 
construction. Estimated project cost is $11,100,000 
(October 1993 price level base). The project was 
functionally complete in November 1994. 
18. HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT 
CREEK, OK. 
Location. On Polecat Creek, a minor tributary of the 
Arkansas River, at river mile 48.6, about 11 miles 
west of Sapulpa, in Creek County, OK. (See Lake 
Heyburn, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 599 of the Annual Report 
for 1969. Construction started in March 1948, and the 
project was placed in useful operation in October 
1950. Channel improvements below the lake were 
completed in September 1952. 
Local cooperation. The channel improvement 
project below the lake was never maintained by 
the sponsor, Joint Drainage District No. 1, Tulsa and 
Creek Counties, OK. For this reason, the channel 
returned to its pre-project condition and does not 
provide flood protection for the affected area. The 
Corps of Engineers discontinued maintenance 
inspections of the channel project in 1982, due 
to the condition of the project and lack of cooperation 
on the part of the sponsor. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
29-6

TULSA,OKLAHOMA,DISTRICT 
19. HUGO LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the Kiamichi River at river mile 
17.6, about 7 miles east of Hugo, in Choctaw County, 
OK. (See Hugo Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, 
scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report 
for 1977. Construction began in October 1967, and 
the project was placed in useful operation in 
January 1974. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
20. HULAH LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the Caney River at river mile 96.2, 
about 15 miles northwest of Bartlesville, near Hulah, 
in Osage County, OK. (See Bowring, OK, Geological 
Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 595 of the Annual Report 
for 1969. Construction began in May 1946, and was 
completed in June 1950. The project was placed in 
full flood control operation in September 1951. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
21. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND 
RESERVOIR, KS. 
Location. The dam is located on the Grand (Neosho) 
River at river mile 343.7, about 2 miles northwest 
of Burlington, in Coffey County, KS. (See John 
Redmond Dam, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 
1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 581 of the Annual Report for 
1970. Construction was initiated in July 1959, and 
was completed in December 1965. The project 
was placed in flood control operation in July 1964. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Construction completed on Embankment Roadway 
Repair Projects. Routine operation and maintenance 
continued. 
22. KAW LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 653.7, 
about 8 miles east ofPonca City, in Kay County, OK. (See 
Charley Creek West, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 
1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 19-13 of the Annual Report for 
1977. Construction began in June 1966, and the project 
was placed in operation in May 1976. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
23. LAKE KEMP, TX. 
Location. On the Wichita River at river mile 126.7, 
about 40 miles southwest of Wichita Falls, TX. (See 
Northeast Lake Kemp, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 
1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 19-14 of the Annual Report for 
1977. Construction began in May 1970, and the project 
was placed in useful operation in October 1972. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
24. LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY 
CREEK, TX. 
Location. The project is located in Wichita andArcher 
Counties, TX. The Lake Wichita dam and the Holliday 
Creek channel are located in the city ofWichita Falls, TX. 
(See Wichita Falls, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 
1:24,000.) 
Existing project. The existing Lake Wichita dam 
was replaced with an earthen dam approximately 16,000 
feet long with a concrete spillway, an auxiliary spillway, 
andlow-flow outlet works. Channelimprovements along 
Holliday Creek from the new spillway to the Wichita 
River, a distance of 9.3 miles, were also constructed. 
Local cooperation. Fully compiled with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
The project is fully operational. A repair and correction 
contract was awarded in February 1996, to 
correct deficiencies prior to transferring the project 
29-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THEARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIES FORFY 1995 
to the local sponsor. Estimated project cost is 
$48,789,000 (October 1995 price level base). 
25. MARION RESERVOIR, KS. 
Location. On the Cottonwood River at river mile 
126.7, about 3 miles northwest of Marion, in 
Marion County, KS. (See Pilson, KS, Geological 
Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 597 of the Annual Report 
for 1969. Construction began in June 1964, and the 
project was placed in flood control operation in 
February 1968. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
26. MCGRATH CREEK, WICHITA 
FALLS, TX. 
Location. The project is located in the northern 
central portion of Texas, in the city of Wichita Falls. 
Existing project. McGrath Creek is approximately 
3,900 feet long and connects Sikes Lake 
and the recently constructed Holliday Creek project. 
The project involves realigning and concrete 
lining the McGrath Creek Channel, and constructing 
a new spillway to pass flows through Sikes Lake. 
Local cooperation. The city of Wichita Falls, TX, 
is the non-Federal sponsor. The Project Cooperation 
Agreement was executed in November 1994. In 
accordance with the cost sharing and financing 
concepts reflected in the Water Resources Act of 
1986, the non-Federal sponsor must provide lands, 
easements, rights-of-way and dredged material 
disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, 
bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, 
where necessary for the construction of the project; 
and pay five percent of the costs allocated to flood 
control and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, 
repair, rehabilitation and replacement of flood 
control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also 
agreed to make all required payments concurrently 
with project construction. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Contract plans are complete. The Project Cooperation 
Agreement was executed in November 1994. The FY96 
funds will be used to monitor real estate activities and 
to initiate the channel construction, which is scheduled 
for a March 1996 award. The FY97 funds will be 
used to continue the channel construction. 
27. MINGO CREEK, OK. 
Location. On the right-bank tributary of Bird 
Creek in the city of Tulsa, in Tulsa County, OK. 
(See Tulsa, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. The recommended plan will 
consist of 23 detention sites, which would capture 
peak flows and hold them temporarily until downstream 
flows subside. There would be about 9.4 miles 
of channelization in selected locations on the tributaries 
and main stem of Mingo Creek. 
Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost 
sharing and financing concepts reflected in the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non- 
Federal sponsor must provide lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; 
modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges 
(except railroad bridges), and other facilities where 
necessary in the construction of the project; pay five 
percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear 
all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement 
of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has 
also agreed to make all required payments concurrently 
with project construction. The local sponsor 
is the city of Tulsa, OK. On August 26, 1983, the city 
of Tulsa adopted a Resolution of Assurance to 
provide a minimum share equal to 35 percent or the 
traditional lands, easements, and rights-of-way, 
whichever is greater, and will be required to assist in 
the actual financing of construction. The city has 
constructed 4.75 miles of channel and placed two 
excavated detention facilities into flood control operation 
prior to initiation of Federal construction in 
September 1988. The project is currently 65% complete. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Reimbursement to date for work completed by the 
City of Tulsa is $15,000,000. Estimated project cost 
is $138,000,000 (October 1995 price level base). 
28. OOLOGAH LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 
90.2, about 2 miles southeast of Oologah, in Rogers 
County, OK. (See Oologah, OK, Geological Survey 
map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 19-15 of the Annual Report 
for 1972. Construction began in July 1950, but the 
project was placed in standby status in October 
29-8

TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 
1951. Construction resumed in December 1955, and 
was completed in May 1963 for initial development. 
Construction for ultimate (second stage) development 
was initiated in July 1967, and was completed in 
1974. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
29. OPTIMA LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the North Canadian River at river 
mile 623.2, about 4.5 miles northeast of Hardesty, 
in Texas County, OK. (See Optima Dam, OK, Geological 
Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the existing 
improvement, see page 19-16 of the Annual Report for 
1979. Construction began in March 1966, and impoundment 
began in October 1978. Construction was 
completed in 1981. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
30. PARKER LAKE, OK. 
Location. On Muddy Boggy Creek, a tributary of 
the Red River, about 23 miles east of Ada, in Coal 
County, OK. (See Parker, OK, Geological Survey 
map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. Parker Lake, when constructed, 
will be a multipurpose element in a plan of improvement 
for the Upper Muddy Boggy Creek Basin, OK. 
The project consists of an earthfill dam about 2,200 
feet long, a gated outlet works for flood control and 
water supply, and a 100-foot-wide spillway. The lake 
created would have a total storage capacity of 
220,240 acre-feet and would yield 42 million gallons 
per day for municipal and industrial water supply. 
The project was authorized by the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986. 
Local cooperation. The Oklahoma Water Resources 
Board, the sponsor, has agreed to cost share in the 
flood control portion of the project and the water 
supply provided enough interested users for the water 
supply can be identified. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. Estimated 
project cost is $71,400,000 (October 1992 price 
level base). 
31. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX. 
Location. On Sanders Creek, a tributary of the Red 
River, at river mile 4.6, about 12 miles north of Paris, in 
Lamar County, TX. (See Grant, TX, Geological Survey 
map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 
1970. Construction began in March 1965, and the project 
was placed in full flood control operation in September 
1967. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
32. PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL 
LAKE, KS. 
Location. On Big Hill Creek at river mile 33.3, about 
4.5 miles east of Cherryvale, KS. (See Dennis, KS, 
Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 
1983. Construction began in April 1974, and impoundment 
began in March 1981. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
33. PINE CREEK LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the Little River at river mile 145.3, 
about 5 miles northwest of Wright City, in McCurtain 
County, OK. (See Wright City, OK, Geological Survey 
map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 
1970. Construction began in February 1963, and the 
project was placed in useful operation in June 1969. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
34. SARDIS LAKE, OK. 
Location. On Jackfork Creek, a tributary of 
the Kiamichi River, at river mile 2.8, about 2.5 
miles north of Clayton, in Pushmataha County, OK. 
29-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKSACTIVITIES FOR FPY 196 
(See Yanush, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 
1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report 
for 1983. Sardis Lake is operated as a unit of a twolake 
system for flood control in the Kiamichi River 
Basin. (The other lake in the system is Hugo Lake). 
Construction began in August 1975, and the 
project became operational in January 1983. 
Local cooperation. Negotiations are currently 
underway with the Oklahoma Water Resources 
Board to initiate payment for water supply storage. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
35. SKIATOOK LAKE, OK. 
Location. On Hominy Creek, a tributary of Bird 
Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 14.3, 
about 5 miles west of Skiatook, in Osage County, OK. 
(See Avant S.E., OK, Geological Survey map, scale 
1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see Page19-8 of the Annual Report 
for 1987. Construction began in January 1974, impoundment 
began in October 1984, and the project became 
operational in November 1984. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
36. TORONTO LAKE, KS. 
Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 271.5, 
about 4 miles southeast of Toronto, in Woodson County, 
KS. (See Fredonia, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 
1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 600 of the Annual Report 
for 1969. Construction began in November 1954, and 
the project was placed in full operation in March 1960. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
37. TULSA AND WEST TULSA, OK. 
Location. On the banks of the Arkansas River near 
Tulsa, OK. On the left bank, the levee extends from 
river mile 531.0 near Sand Springs, OK, downstream 
to river mile 521.4 at Tulsa. On the right bank, the 
levee extends from near river mile 526.7 downstream 
to river mile 521.3 and is adjacent to the major portion 
of the business and residential districts in West 
Tulsa, Tulsa County, OK. 
Existing project. The Tulsa and West Tulsa levees 
were completed by the Tulsa District in 1945. The 
project was turned over to the Tulsa County Drainage 
District No. 12 for operations and maintenance. The 
project consists of 3 levees with a total length of about 
20 miles and an average height of 10 feet. The levees 
provide protection from flooding to property valued 
at approximately $1 billion dollars. Many of the pipes 
that pass under the levee have deteriorated and levee 
material has eroded into the pipes leaving small 
cavities in the embankment. The Tulsa District completed 
an evaluation of the levees in September 1989, 
which determined that rehabilitation would be required 
for the levees to operate as designed. Funds to repair 
the levee were provided in FY 91 and FY 94 by the 
U.S. Congress. 
Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation 
Agreement was executed in March 1992, and Tulsa 
County and Levee District No. 12, the non-Federal 
sponsors, provided funds of $325,000 in March 1992. 
Approximately one-half of the project repairs have 
been completed to date. The sponsors will be required 
to sign a supplement to the LCA and provide and 
additional $150,000 as a result of funding and authority 
included in the FY 94 Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act by the U.S. Congress. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Phase I contract for repair of 23 of the 48 deficient 
pipes was awarded July 30, 1992, and completed in 
July 1993. Phase II construction is scheduled to be 
initiated in August 1996, pending execution of a supplement 
to the LCA. 
38. WAURIKA LAKE, OK. 
Location. On Beaver Creek, a tributary of the Red 
River, at river mile 27.0, about 6 miles northwest 
of Waurika, in Jefferson County, OK. (See Hastings, 
OK-TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report 
for 1983. Waurika Lake is operated as a unit of a 
coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red 
River Basin. Construction began in July 1971, and 
impoundment began in August 1977. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
29-10

TUQLAE]OMA, DSTRICT 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operations and maintenance continued. 
39. WISTER LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the Poteau River at river mile 
60.9, about 2 miles south of Wister, in LeFlore County, 
OK. (See Wister, OK, Geological Survey map, 
scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 601 of the Annual Report 
for 1969. Construction began in April 1946, and was 
completed in May 1949. The project was placed in 
full flood control operation in October 1949. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Per Congressional direction, in the FY 96 Energy 
and Water Development Appropriations Act, the pool 
elevation was held to a minimum of 475.5 feet, NGVD. 
The current seasonal pool plan was suspended from 
July 15 to September 30. 
40. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS. 
See Table 29-E. 
41. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION 
PROJECTS. 
Inspections of completed, Federally constructed 
local flood protection projects which are owned, 
operated, and maintained by local interests are made 
to determine the extent of compliance with approved 
regulations for operations and maintenance. The 
inspections assist the Corps of Engineers in determining 
if the project provides the flood protection for 
which it was constructed. See Table 29-I for a list of 
projectsinspectedin FY95. Fiscal year cost was $147,111. 
42. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL 
RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. ' 
The Tulsa District Corps of Engineers is responsible 
for flood control operations at 12 non-Corps 
projects. These include nine Bureau of Reclamation 
lakes, two Grand River Dam Authority lakes, and 
one city-county owned lake. All of these projects were 
constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds. 
Routine flood control releases were required at several 
of the projects. Fiscal year costs for scheduling 
flood control reservoir operations totaled $550,075. 
43. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL 
ACTIVITIES. 
Fiscal year cost for national emergency preparedness 
was $104,478 and for advance preparation was 
$119,903. 
44. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. 
See Table 29-J for FY 95 expenditures for Small 
Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized 
by Congress (Section 205); Emergency Streambank 
and Shoreline Projects (Section 14). 
Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 
45. BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the Mountain Fork River at river 
mile 20.3, about 9 miles northeast of Broken Bow, 
in McCurtain County, OK. (See Broken Bow, OK, 
Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvements, see page 29-17 of the Annual Report 
for 1971. Construction began in November 1961, and 
the project was placed in useful operation in October 
1969. Power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation 
in January and June 1970, respectively. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
46. EUFAULA LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the Canadian River at river mile 27.0, 
about 12 miles east of Eufaula, in McIntosh County, OK. 
(See Porum, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 588 of the Annual Report 
for 1970. Construction began in December 1956, and. 
the project was placed in full flood control operation 
in February 1964. 
*Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
29-11

REPORT OFTHE SECRETARYOFTHEARMYONCIVIL WORKSACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
47. FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 
7.7, about 5 miles north of Fort Gibson, in Muskogee 
County, OK. (See Fort Gibson Dam, OK, Geological 
Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 604 of the Annual Report 
for 1969. Construction began in March 1942, but 
was held in abeyance during World War II. Construction 
resumed in May 1946, and was completed in June 
1950. The fourth generator was installed and the 
project placed in full operation in September 1953. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
48. KEYSTONE LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 538.8, 
near Sand Springs, OK, and about 15 miles west 
of Tulsa, OK. (See Keystone Dam, OK, Geological 
Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 589 of the Annual Report 
for 1970. Construction began in January 1957, and 
the project was placed in flood control operation in 
September 1964. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
49. LAKE TEXOMA(DENISON DAM), OK 
ANDTX 
Location. On the Red River at river mile 725.9, 
about 5 miles northwest of Denison, TX. (See Denison 
Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 603 of the Annual Report 
for 1969. Lake Texoma is operated as a unit of 
a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red 
River Basin. Construction started in August 1939, and 
was completed in February 1944. Cozhmercial 
power generation was started in March 1945. Authorized 
work is complete except for installation of the 
third, fourth, and fifth power units. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
50. ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM 
AND RESERVOIR, OK. 
Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation 
mile 336.2, about 8 miles south of Sallisaw, in LeFlore 
County, OK. (See Robert S. Kerr, OK, Geological 
Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 19-21 of the Annual Report 
for 1972. The Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir 
is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas 
River Navigation System. Construction began in April 
1964, and closure was completed in October 1970. The 
lock and dam became operational for navigation in 
December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 
placed in operation in October, July, September, and 
November 1971, respectively. 
Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. 
Terminal facilities. Five sites have been developed 
for handling coal, grain, construction aggregates, and 
miscellaneous cargo. The facilities are considered 
adequate for present traffic. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
51. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK. 
Location. On the Illinois River at river mile 12.8, 
7 miles northeast of Gore, in Sequoyah County, OK. 
(See Gore, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 606 of the Annual Report 
for 1969. Construction began in June 1947, and was 
completed in July 1953. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. Aproject 
to build an auxiliary spillway and to modify the existing 
spillway was authorized 22 February 1994, by the Acting 
Assistant Secretary of the Army, under the Dam Safety 
Assurance Program. 
52. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK. 
Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation 
mile 366.6, about 5 miles northwest of Webbers Falls, 
29-12

TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 
in Muskogee County, OK. (See Webbers Falls, OK, 
Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. For a description of the completed 
improvement, see page 19-23 of the Annual Report 
for 1977. The Webbers Falls Lock and Dam is a unit 
of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. 
Construction began in January 1965, and the 
project was placed in useful operation in November 1970. 
The lock and dam became operational for navigation 
in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, and 3 
were placed in operation in August, September, and 
November 1973, respectively. 
Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities at the Port of 
Muskogee include: a cargo pier, mooring dolphins, 
warehouse, terminal building, and fuel facility built 
by the Muskogee City-County Port Authority; a liquid 
cargo loading facility and a steel unloading facility built 
by Frontier Steel Company; grain holding facilities built 
by Conagra, Inc.; and a general-purpose private dock 
built by the Fort Howard Paper Company. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
General Investigations 
53. SURVEYS. 
Fiscal year cost was $410,705, which included 5 flood 
damage prevention studies; 1 special study; miscellaneous 
activities-special investigations, review of FERC 
licenses, intragency water resources development, and 
North American Waterfowl Management; and coordination 
with other Federal agencies, States, and non- 
Federal interests, including 6 Planning Assistance to 
States Studies, and 2 Native American Workshops. Table 
29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year 
expenditures. 
54. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
BASIC DATA. 
Fiscal year cost was $400,440, which includes 
floodplain management services and hydrologic studies. 
Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective 
fiscal year expenditures. 
55. PRECONSTRUCTION 
ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 
Fiscal year cost was $764,844, which includes four 
local protection projects. Table 29-K provides a specific 
list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 
29-13.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1996 
Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total to 
inText Pro et I(mding FY9Z FY98 FY94 FY95 Sep 80,1995' 
1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas 
River Navigation System, 
OK, (Tulsa District Portion) 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
- 130,936,6382 
- 130,936,6382 
3,461,500 3,189,400 3,413,250 4,525,000 153,680,962 
3,559,308 3,118,662 3,206,865 4,573,329 148,549,547 
3. Arcadia Lake, OK 
21,276 -8,472 
-28,000 85,311,289 
14,512 85,298,327 
379,000 320,800 295,000 
373,861 325,308 298,818 
4. Arkansas-Red River 
Basins Chloride Control, 
KS, OK, and TX 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
- 25,705,208 
- 25,705,068 
- 3,533,506 
- 3,646,832 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
4a. Area V, 
Estelline Springs, TX 
4b. Area VIII, TX 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
3,000 
1,987 
23,649 
570 
1,656 
2,204 
- 46,682,000 
- 46,681,960 
4c. Red River Basin Chloride 
Control, TX & OK 
5. Birch Lake, OK 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
840,500 987,300 892,000 
823,381 972,741 914,559 
978,000 
964,210 
2,450,000 3,000,000 10,000,000 11,468,000 
2,649,908 2,945,617 5,353,915 4,848,027 
6,970,448 
6,931,519 
29,468,000 
16,554,051 
- 13,549,170 
- 13,549,296 
685,000 653,340 657,200 
681,326 648,355 666,319 
29-14 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
1,000,000 
169,161 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
301,000 
257,686 
2,797,782 
2,752,868 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
3,000 
1,443 
300,028 
300,028 
187,669 
200,221 
7,000 
6,461 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
648,000 
619,845 
10,997,740 
14,246,387

TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 
Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
(Continued) 
See 
Seion Totalto 
inText Pkoject Funding FYFY FY 9 FY94 FY95 Sep 30, 1995' 
6. Candy Lake, OK New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
4,927,922 
209 4,927,923 
33,000 
33,431 
16,570 
12,745 
24,000 
27,726 
25,000 
19,770 
181,270 
175,541 
7. Canton Lake, OK 
- 11,209,834 
- 10,918,727 
3,825,800 1,427,000 1,419,100 
3,934,771 1,455,190 1,362,442 
1,731,000 31,334,726 
1,756,383 31,388,198 
- -44,000 88,465,751 
- - 92,035,258 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
9. Council Grove Lake, KS 
884,000 889,000 935,300 
878,128 846,853 882,083 
835,000 
917,655 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
10. El Dorado Lake, KS New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
1,017,000 917,500 1,058,200 1,040,000 
850,373 1,080,975 1,053,649 1,002,187 
- 6,763 3,210 
419,500 430,000 420,000 
422,471 430,835 413,261 
2,064 
406,000 
372,675 
11. Elk City Lake, KS 
- 19,052,990 
- 19,052,990 
733,400 765,030 749,000 
714,407 744,015 777,848 
29-15 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
8. Copan Lake, OK New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
-2,248 
873 
8,793,079 
8,745,669 
11,810,509 
11,810,509 
17,373,343 
17,293,396 
92,505,068 
92,388,388 
5,463,988 
5,421,286 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
631,000 
527,936 
15,033,562 
14,985,257

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
(Continued) 
See 
Sedion Totalto 
inText Prce ding FY92 FY98 FY94 FY95 Sep80,19951 
12. Fall River Lake, KS New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
13. Fort Supply Lake, OK 
956,800 1,162,000 900,000 
996,806 1,211,715 821,770 
981,000 
1,038,375 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
14. Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK 
15. Great Bend, KS 
(Federal) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
16. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK 
17. Halstead, KS 
(Federal) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
18. Heyburn Lake and 
Polecat Creek, OK 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
737,500 758,700 717,000 
727,659 766,603 720,621 
90,000 231,000 
- 77,520 155,545 
4,786,000 3,444,000 
5,548,146 1,569,026 783,727 
2,733,000 242,000 
2,034,480 580,072 
789,000 
764,216 
842,000 
136,987 
-400,000 
646,387 
176,956 
337,000 352,000 386,600 
326,261 356,411 397,650 
2,828,000 3,204,000 905,000 
2,808,865 2,536,569 1,591,289 
390,000 
311,848 
- 4,081,000 
- 3,888,107 
- 4,626,270 
- 4,626,270 
303,000 
285,870 
-46,684 
400,000 
-58,019 
10,550,873 
10,550,873 
16,864,691 
17,015,887 
7,724,134 
7,723,127 
15,261,398 
15,204,287 
1,163,000 
370,052 
21,073,400 
20,244,469 
9,221,386 
9,189,719 
8,283,000 
8,152,579 
800,000 
253,829 
2,560,572 
2,560,572 
29-16

TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 
Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
(Continued) 
See 
Sedian Totalto 
inText EPmiudnegt ~ FY92 FY98 FY94 FY95 Sep 0,19951 
Heyburn Lake (cont'd) 
19. Hugo Lake, OK 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
683,000 673,130 741,000 
665,157 692,616 653,511 
709,000 
748,671 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
12,815,603 
12,863,385 
- 41,216,442 
- 41,180,456 
1,410,500 1,607,000 1,567,283 
1,307,664 1,684,980 1,484,063 
1,362,000 25,163,827 
1,339,108 24,952,720 
20. Hulah Lake, OK New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
21. John Redmond Dam 
and Reservoir, KS 
306,000 343,100 361,000 
317,347 343,974 280,721 
210,000 
268,215 
Minor Rehab 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
11,388,150 
11,182,433 
13,110,000 
13,058,099 
135,718 
135,718 
1,022,000 1,020,280 1,030,000 
1,021,250 1,014,293 993,779 
2,048,000 25,962,080 
1,920,624 25,897,836 
22. Kaw Lake, OK 
- 109,430,750 
876 109,430,150 
1,775,200 1,600,000 1,539,400 
1,724,787 1,669,082 1,564,402 
1,685,000 29,000,323 
1,635,730 28,939,018 
23. Lake Kemp, TX New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
137,000 184,720 157,000 
125,281 188,149 157,928 
29-17 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
- 28,151,515 
- 28,151,515 
New Work 
Approp- 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cos 
7,637,702 
7,637,702 
2,907,612 
2,865,986 
145,000 
116,038

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
(Continued) 
See 
Sedon Totalto 
inTezt Project Ftzidng FY92 FY98 FY94 FY95 Sep30,1995' 
1,894,00 
24. Lake Wichita, 
Holliday Creek, TX 
(Contrib. Funds) 
25. Marion Reservoir, KS 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
349,000 3,074,000 3,446,000 
890,417 1,682,488 2,462,180 
2,000,000 
370,000 
- 1,500,000 
1,1000,000 2,014,046 
1,894,000 
4,030,735 
476,659 
32,994,000 
32,453,256 
7,260,000 
7,260,001 
13,420,817 
- 13,420,817 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
26. McGrath Creek 
Wichita Falls, TX 
(Federal) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
27. Mingo Creek, OK 
(Federal) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
28. Oologah Lake, OK 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
907,600 949,000 1,008,800 
907,012 959,555 996,250 
- 86,000 
63,102 
12,183,000 5,395,000 11,500,000 
12,359,164 3,125,564 7,250,412 
1,800,000 
410,147 778,055 382,267 
- 46,722,3298 
- 46,721,556 s 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
29. Optima Lake, OK 
1,427,500 1,546,000 1,617,150 
1,423,709 1,558,987 1,604,516 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
429,500 488,700 400,000 
427,111 468,849 424,560 
29-18 
1,033,000 
1,009,661 
1,431,000 
117,413 
187,500 
7,764,000 
5,915,342 
1,750,000 
684,498 
17,743,518 
17,671,285 
1,517,000 
180,515 
187,500
0 
55,124,000 
45,810,033 
8,038,000 
6,423,107 
1,564,000 
1,554,425 
28,488,363 
28,443,808 
47,173,438 
47,173,438 
7,170,050 
7,182,176 
195,000 
169,839

TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 
Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
(Continued) 
See 
Sedain Totalto 
inTezt Pqject lding FY92 FY98 FY94 FY95 Sep 0,1995' 
30. Parker Lake, OK 
31. Pat Mayse Lake, TX 
32. Pearson-Skubitz 
Big Hill Lake, KS 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
2,258 - - 
939,400 813,700 846,200 
965,137 817,264 841,146 
-12,000 
991 
776,000 
774,479
- 16,879,166 
- 16,879,165 
937,000 846,000 
925,070 874,204 
33. Pine Creek Lake, OK 
- 20,628,049 
32 - 20,627,879 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
34. Sardis Lake, OK New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
35. Skiatook Lake, OK New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
1,162,600 1,112,520 1,233,000 
1,137,726 1,138,385 1,219,309 
-169,000 
4,068 5,562 -104,314 
926,000 930,100 946,000 
862,618 949,340 941,081 
1,130,000 
1,078,109 
106,090 
894,000 
833,195 
-8,000 106,193,282 
141 - 106,268,739 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
35. Toronto Lake, KS 
1,256,000 858,800 1,183,500 
1,076,141 989,018 1,097,303 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
29-19 
510,000 
510,000 
9,310,661 
9,310,661 
16,253,350 
16,225,567 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
841,210 
815,567 
893,000 
911,799 
10,942,828 
10,946,837 
17,671,073 
17,561,723 
68,799,479 
68,624,267 
9,614,490 
9,492,462 
1,165,000 
1,304,943 
9,972,238 
9,925,212 
13,896,324 
13,896,324

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
(Continued) 
See 
Sectiun Totalto 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 98 FY 94 FY 95 Sep 80, 19951 
Toronto Lake (cont'd) 
37. Tulsa & West Tulsa, OK 
(Federal) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
38. Waurika Lake, OK 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
263,000 319,110 295,000 
264,871 319,746 292,371 
840,000 
153,044 
325,000 
-323,752 
-313,970 
- 450,000 
498,057 90,558 
- - 
100,000 
-8,340 
1,235,600 1,206,410 1,210,000 
1,261,658 1,224,948 1,207,690 
327,000 
314,665 
10,416 
1,353,000 
1,334,822 
39. Wister Lake, OK 
45. Broken Bow Lake, OK 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
Major Rehab 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
720,000 781,000 916,000 
716,466 793,560 798,671 
3,996,000 
4,095,199 270,394 84,439 
- 10,501,226 
- 10,501,226 
709,000 
670,741 
2,488 
15,438,653 
15,269,546 
11,131,529 
11,131,529 
- 41,222,692 
- 41,222,692 
1,752,200 2,171,200 1,728,000 1,769,000 
1,860,381 2,161,510 1,726,921 1,462,774 
46. Eufaula Lake, OK 
- 670,000 
29,905 660,763 
- 124,020,7474 
32,946 123,802,5434 
(Contrib. Funds) 
7,007,216 
6,990,128 
1,425,000 
817,778 
325,000 
100,000 
69,740,298 
69,731,529 
16,191,963 
15,165,785 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Contrib. 
Cost 
29,321,721 
28,980,578 
330,000 
212,318 
330,000 
212,318 
29-20

TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 
Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
(Continued) 
Sm 
Seeion Totalto 
in Text .. Project Funding FY 92 FY 98 FY 94 FY 95 Sep 80, 1995' 
Eufaula Lake (cont'd) 
47. Fort Gibson Lake, OK 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
4,038,400 3,573,473 4,487,430 71,207,463 75,148,463 
3,923,005 3,795,793 4,063,353 67,663,049 72,087,165 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
3,734,000 3,542,700 3,392,100 
3,533,649 3,801,859 3,339,648 
3,325,000 
3,352,223 
42,591,2986 
43,497,791' 
65,607,802 
66,945,659 
48. Keystone Lake, OK New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
49. Lake Texoma 
(Denison Dam),OK and TX 
- 123,171,1736 
- 123,170,6756 
3,022,685 3,109,000 3,306,542 
3,050,124 2,977,460 3,250,637 
3,452,000 
3,545,721 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
58,093,277 
58,062,795 
68,168,960' 
68,019,109' 
Maint 
Approp 6,265,000 5,434,700 5,744,100 
Cost 6,303,084 5,503,214 5,758,102 
5,283,000 116,858,786 
5,221,818 116,716,644 
Minor Rehab 
Approp 
Cost 
46,237 
46,237 
50. Robert S. Kerr Lock and 
Dam and Reservoir, OK 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
51. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK 
- - - - 94,578,237 
- - - 94,578,237 
2,900,500 3,019,520 2,935,950 3,184,000 61,663,003 
3,104,279 3,004,368 2,839,011 3,169,736 61,144,951 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
870,000 
45,775 
- 24,887,7208 
556,414 24,659,9078 
29-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
(Continued) 
See 
Seaton Totalto 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep 80, 199' 
Maint 
Approp 3,005,000 3,064,000 3,098,550 3,350,000 57,313,697 
Cost 2,965,843 3,114,736 3,060,313 3,302,805 57,229,342 
52. Webbers Falls New Work 
Lock & Dam, OK Approp - - - - 86,107,967 
Cost - - - 86,108,391 
Maint 
Approp 2,809,000 2,457,500 2,672,250 2,677,000 54,905,241 
Cost 2,875,685 2,456,339 2,572,133 2,734,587 54,959,569 
1. Includes $2,077,900 expended by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8 dated, March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Tables 29-M of the FY 86 Annual 
Report. 
2. Includes $12,700,038 for Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification. 
3. Excludes $81,460 contributed funds and $1,348,816 special funds. 
4. Excludes $299,803 contributed funds and $13,211,728 special funds. 
5. Exdudes $134,919 contributed funds. Includes $49,581 Public Works aoeleration funds. 
6. Excludes $5,366,231 special funds. 
7. Includes $433,549 Emergency Relief funds. Exchange $1,256,068 from special contributed funds. 
8. Excludes $946 contributed funds. Includes $39,999 Public Works acoeleration funds. 
9. The cost for Grand Lake O' the Cherokees has been added to the amount reported in paragraph 42, Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir 
Operations. 
29-22

TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 29-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Dateof Project 
Sedon Autodinig andWork 
InTezt Act Authed Iun 
1. 
3. 
HD 79-758 
PL 79-525 
PL 94-587 
PL 99-662 
HD 91-299 
PL 94-587 
July 24, 1946 
October 22, 1976 
November 17, 1986 
December 31, 1970 
October 22, 1976 
October 23, 1962 
November 7, 1966 
December 31, 1970 
November 17, 1986 
October 23, 1962 
October 23, 1962 
June 28, 1938 
July 24, 1946 
June 30, 1948 
October 23, 1962 
May 17, 1950 
October 27, 1965 
August 18, 1941 
August 18, 1941 
June 22, 1936 
November 17, 1986 
November 17, 1986 
June 22, 1936 
November 17, 1986 
July 24, 1946 
29-23 
McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS 
RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM 
Big and Little Sallisaw 
Creeks Navigation Project 
W.D. Mayo Hydropwer 
ARCADIA LAKE 
Changed water quality to 
water supply 
ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS 
CHLORIDE CONTROL 
Authorized Area V 
(Estelline Springs) 
Authorized Areas VII, VIII, and X P 
Authorized Areas I, II-III, 
VI, IX, XIII, XIV, and XV 
Authorized the Red River Basin 
and the Arkansas River Basin as 
separate projects with separate 
authority. 
BIRCH LAKE 
CANDY LAKE 
CANTON LAKE 
Approved Irrigation Storage 
Approved Water Supply Storage 
COPAN LAKE 
COUNCIL GROVE LAKE 
EL DORADO LAKE 
ELK CITY LAKE 
FALL RIVER LAKE 
FORT SUPPLY LAKE 
FRY CREEKS 
GREAT BEND 
GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE 
HALSTEAD 
HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK 
SD 87-107 
L 89-789, SD 110 
PL 91-611 
PL 99-662 
HD 87-563 
HD 87-564 
HD 75-569 
HD 87-563 
HD 80-442 
HD 89-232 
HD 76-440 
HD 76-440 
HD 74-308 
PL 99-662 
PL 99-662 
HD 74-308 
PL 99-662 
HD 80-290 
4. 
4a. 
4b.&4c. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
9. 
10. 
11. 
12. 
13. 
14. 
15. 
16. 
17. 
18.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 29-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
(Continued) 
See Dateof Proje 
Senm Authoriiing andWork 
InText Act Authoized DoIbameni 
19. July 24, 1946 
20. 
21. 
22. 
23. 
24. 
25. 
26. 
27. 
28. 
29. 
30. 
31. 
32. 
33. 
34. 
35. 
36. 
37. 
38. 
39. 
HUGO LAKE HD 79-602 
June 22, 1936 
May 17, 1950 
February 15, 1958 
October 23, 1962 
October 23, 1962 
November 17, 1986 
May 17, 1950 
March 14, 1990 
November 17, 1988 
November 17, 1986 
June 28, 1938 
June 22, 1936 
November 17, 1986 
October 23, 1962 
October 23, 1962 
November 10, 1978 
July 3, 1958 
October 23, 1962 
December 4, 1981 
October 23, 1962 
August 18, 1941 
August 18, 1941 
December 30, 1963 
June 28, 1938 
29-24 
HULAH LAKE HD 74-308 
JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR HD 80-442 
Authorized name change PL 85-327 
KAW LAKE HD 87-143 
LAKE KEMP HD 87-144 
LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK PL 99-662 
MARION RESERVOIR HD 80-442 
Authorized name change PL 101-253 
MCGARTH CREEK WICHITA FALLS, TX PL 100-676 
MINGO CREEK PL 99-662 
OOLOGAH LAKE Committee Doc. 
No. 1, 75th 
Cong., 1st Session 
OPTIMA LAKE HD 74-308 
PARKER LAKE PL 99-662 
PAT MAYSE LAKE HD 88-71 
PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE HD 87-472 
Authorized name change PL 95-265 
PINE CREEK LAKE HD 85-170 
SARDIS LAKE SD 87-145 
Authorized name change PL 97-88 
SKIATOOK LAKE HD 87-563 
TORONTO LAKE HD 76-440 
PL 77-228 
TULSA & WEST TULSA, OK PL 77-228 
WAURIKA LAKE SD 88-33 
PL 88-253 
WISTER LAKE Committee Doc. 
No. 1, 75th 
Cong., 1st Session

TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 29-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
(Continued) 
see Dated Po 
Aut -SewZn andWork 
InTe t Act Authoiaed Ibammen 
44. (cont'd) July 30, 1983 
45. July 3, 1958 
October 23, 1962 
46. July 24, 1946 
July 16,1984 
November 17, 1986 
47. August 18, 1941 
July 24, 1946 
November 17, 1986 
48. May 17, 1950 
49. 
June 28, 1938 
October 17, 1940 
Sepember 30, 1944 
August 14, 1953 
November 17, 1986 
50. July 24, 1946 
July 8, 1963 
Changed conservation pool 
elevation 
BROKEN BOW LAKE 
EUFAULA LAKE 
Authorized Piney Creek and 
Muddy Creek bridge replacement 
Authorized cost sharing 
FORT GIBSON LAKE 
Incorporated into the multiple-purpose plan 
for the Arkansas River Basin 
Added hydropower units 5 & 6 
KEYSTONE LAKE 
LAKE TEXOMA (Denison Dam) 
Flood control and power 
Navigation and regulating flows 
Authorized name 
Water supply 
Recreation 
ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND 
DAM AND RESERVOIR 
Authorized name change 
June 28, 1938 
June 24, 1946 
July 24, 1946 
TENKILLER FERRY LAKE 
Power 
Committee Doc. 
No. 1, 75th 
Cong., 1st Sess. 
HD 79-758 
WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM HD 79-758 
TABLE 29-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Cost to September 30, 1995 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status report for Construction Maintnenace 
Big and Little Sallisaw Inactive - - 
Navigation Project 
Poteau River Navigation Project, Complete 1983 536,952 
OK and AR 
Red River from Fulton, AR, Complete 1924 378,574 182,157 
to Mouth of Washita River 
29-25 
PL 98-63 
HD 85-170 
SD 87-137 
HD 79-758 
PL 98-360 
PL99-662 
HD 76-107 
PL 76-228 
PL 99-662 
SD 81-07 
HD 75-541 
PL 76-868 
PL 78-454 
PL 83-273 
PL 99-662 
HD 79-758 
PL 88-62 
51. 
52.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 29-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Cost to September 80, 1995 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Report For Construction Maintepance 
Augusta LPP, KS' 2 1938 84,217 
Big Pine Lake, TXs 1984 1,701,670 
Boswell Lake, OKs 1952 
Cherry and Red Fork Creeks LPP, OK' 1970 261,448 
Crutcho Creek LPP, OK8 1972 213,016 - 
Dodge City LPP, KSEnid 
LPP, OK' 1963 743,612 14,599 
Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks LPP, 1975 1,741,000 - 
Tulsa, OK', 4 
Florence LPP, KS* 1965 369,782 - 
Hutchinson LPP, KS 1956 3,497,718 - 
Iola LPP, KS= 1939 22,290 
Jenks LPP, OKs 1950 344,797 
Joe Creek LPP, OK= - 308,041 - 
Lamed LPP, KSs - - 
Lukfata Lake, OKs 1983 1,424,685 
Marion, KS 1988 5,488,618 
Oklahoma City LPP, OKs 1960 8,047,512 
Red River Bank Stabilization Below Denison, 1953 222,105 - 
OK and TX2 
Sand Creek LPP, KSs 1968 545,996 - 
Sand Lake, OKs 1963 - - 
Shidler Lake, OKs 1983 568,191 - 
Tulsa and West Tulsa LPP, OK' 1954 3,592,432 
Turtle Creek LPP, Yukon, OKs 1975 144,853 
Tuskahoma Lake, OKs 1963 - - 
West Branch Chisholm Creek LPP, KS' 1965 364,200 - 
Wichita and Valley Center LPP, KS' 1960 12,247,379 - 
Winfield LPP, KS', 2 1937 - - 
LPP - Local Protection Project. 
1. Completed by Kansas Works Progress Administration. 
2. Complete. 
3. Deferred. 
4. Federal cost limited to $1,000,000. 
5. Active with no current year expenditures. 
29-26

TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 29-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Day Federal Contributed 
See Annual and Funds Funds 
Project Report for Authority Expended Expended 
Cedar Point Lake, Ks 1980 November 17, 1986 0 0 
Public Law 99-662 
Cow Creek, Hutchinson, Ks 1971 November 17, 1986 363,720 0 
Public Law 99-662 
El Dorado, West Branch, 1977 November 17, 1986 92,319 0 
Walnut River, KS Public Law 99-662 
Neodesha Lake, KS 1952 November 17, 1986 97,910 0 
Public Law 99-662 
Towanda Lake, KS 1981 November 17, 1986 393,361 0 
Public Law 99-662 
TABLE 29-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN MULTIPLE-PUPOSE PLAN 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
Feature River River Mile' Nearest Town 
LAKES 
Canton North Canadian 394.3 Canton, OK 
Elk City Elk River 8.7 Elk City, KS 
Eufaula Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK 
Fall River Fall River 54.2 Fall River, KS 
Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK 
Grand Lake O' the Cherokees Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK 
Keystone Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK 
Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Locust Grove, OK 
Neodesha Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS 
Oologah Verdigris 90.2 Oologah, OK 
Tenkiller Ferry Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK 
Toronto Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS 
Wister Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK 
McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK 
(Tulsa District Portion) 
Bank Stabilization and Verdigris and N/As Fort Smith, AR, 
Channel Rectification Arkansas to Catoosa, OK 
Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK Verdigris 401.5 Okay, OK 
Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK Verdigris 421.6 Inola, OK 
Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (15), OK Arkansas 339.0 Sallisaw, OK 
Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, OK Arkansas 336.2 Cowlington, OK 
Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK Sans Bois Creek 341.0 Keota, OK 
W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK Arkansas 319.6 Redland, OK 
Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK Arkansas 366.6 Gore, OK 
1. On the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, these are navigation miles. 
2. As required for a channel 9 feet deep. 
29-27

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 29-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD 
PROTECTION PROJECTS 
(See Section 41 of Text) 
Projects Inspected in Fiscal Year Inspection Date 
South Deer Creek,OK October 1994 
Dodge City, KS November 1994 
Florence, KS November 1994 
Great Bend, KS November 1994 
Hutchinson, KS April 1995 
Iola, KS December 1994 
Lamed, KS November 1994 
Marion, KS November 1994 
Mingo Creek, Audubon Creek, OK October 1994 
Mingo Creek, 36th Street North, OK October 1994 
Sand Creek, City of Newton, KS November 1994 
Cherry/Red Fork Creeks, OK October 1994 
Flat Rock/Valley View Cks, OK October 1994 
Haikey Creek, OK October 1994 
Jenks, OK October 1994 
Joe Creek, OK October 1994 
Tulsa/West Tulsa Levees, OK October 1994 
Enid Diversion Channel, OK October 1994 
Oklahoma City Floodway, OK May 1995 
Park City, KS May 1995 
West Branch Chisholm Creek, KS May 1995 
Wichita/Valley Center, KS May 1995 
TABLE 29-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK 
UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
(See Section 44 of Text) 
Fiscal Year 
Study Identification/Name Cost 
SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY 
AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS (Section 205) 
Coody Creek, Muskogee, OK 
East Boomer Creek, Stillwater, OK 
Liberal KS 
Rock Hollow Creek, Chichasha, OK 
Wichita Falls, TX, Plum Creek 
Wolf Creek, Lawton, OK 
TOTAL SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (Section 14) 
Arkansas River,Sand Springs, OK 
Chikaskia River, Ft Oakland, OK 
City Dam, Fall River, KS 
City Dam, Little Caney River, KS 
County Bridge, Arkansas River, Ralston, OK 
County Bridge, Washita River, Garvin County, OK 
7,665 
10,330 
3,768 
867 
74,026 
42,706 
139,542 
121,422 
126,933 
21,730 
4,764 
17,042 
8,408 
29-28

TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 29-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK 
(Continued) UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
(See Section 44 of Text) 
Fiscal Year 
Study Identification/Name Cost 
County Road, Neosho River, Lyon County, KS 15 
Kiowa Tribe Housing Developement, Andarko, OK 110,223 
Levee, Arkansas River, Tulsa, OK 123,295 
North Canadian River, Okfuskee County, OK 2,904 
Route 418, Lyon County, KS 72 
Sewage Lagoons, Washita River, OK 14,234 
Walnut River, Cowley County, KS 7325 
TOTAL EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION 558,367 
TABLE 29-K GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
(See Sections 53, 54, and 55 of Text) 
Fiscal Year 
Study Identification/Name Cost 
SURVEYS 
Flood Damage Prevention Studies 
Bird Creek Basin, OK 
Bird Creek-Pawhuska FIeld Study, OK 
Bowie County Levee, TX 
Lake Texoma, OK & TX 
Pecan Bayou, TX 
Special Studies 
Environmental Services Partners 
Miscellaneous Activities 
Special Investigations 
Review of FERC Licenses 
Intragency Water Resources Development 
North American Water Fowl Management 
Coordination with Other Federal Agencies, States, and Non-Federal Interests 
Soil Conservation Service 
Coop with Other Water Resource Development Agencies 
Planning Assistance to States 
Indian Workshops 
Kansas, Neosho River, Basin Yield 
Oklahoma, Comprehensive Water Plan 
Oklahoma, Mangum Lake 
Oklahoma, Mangum Lake - Phase II 
175,387 
55,143 
270 
256 
618 
12,232 
22,578 
7,453 
13,765 
828 
14,303 
4,332 
2,175 
24,677 
400 
47,922 
29-29

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 29-K GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
(Continued) (See Sections 52, 53, and 54 of Text) 
Fiscal Year 
Study Identification/Name Cost 
Oklahoma, Paloduro Creek 21,400 
Oklahoma, Poteau Valley Improvement Authority 2,274 
Negotiation Funds 4,692 
TOTAL SURVEYS 410,705 
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 
Flood Plain Management Services 
Eastgate, Ottawa County, OK 18,172 
Flood Plain Management Services 133,884 
Indian Workshops 4,652 
NFPC 1,237 
Quick Responses 8,537 
SS-Bixby, OK FPP 11,978 
SS-Cache Creek, OK 2,884 
SS-Haysville, KS 45,044 
SS-South Hutchinson, KS 29,227 
SS-Shawnee, OK 20 
Technical Services General 143,814 
Hydrologic Studies 
Storm Studies 991 
.TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 400,440 
PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
Flood Control Projects 
Local Protection 
Arkansas City, KS 354,615 
McGrath Creek, TX 482 
Upper Little Arkansas River, Watershed, KS 331 
Winfield, KS 409.416 
TOTAL PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 764,844 
29-30

FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT *
District includes that portion of Texas south of Red 
River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio 
Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River, 
exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising 
in coastal plain of'lTexas and flowing into the GulfofMexico, 
including entirebasins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San 
Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas 
Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing 
into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, 
downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, 
Texas; Neches River downstream from 'lbwn Bluff gaging 
station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State 
Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River. 
downstream from confluence with Navasota River; 
Colorado River downstream from gaging station at 
Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence 
with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream 
from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River 
downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa 
Rivers; and exclusive of Agua Dulce, San Fernando, 
and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffin Bay; coastal 
area south thereof to Rio Grande and south to the 
northern boundaries of Newton, Jasper, Tyler, Polk, 
Trinity, Walker, Waller, Austin, Fayette, Gonzales, 
Karnes, Live Oak, Jim Hogg, Zapata; the northern and 
western boundaries of McMullan; and the western 
boundaries of Montgomery and Duval Counties, Texas. 
District also includes those portions of the Sulphur 
River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State 
of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River 
drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing 
at Bon Wier, Texas. 
30-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. Trinity River Project, TX .................. 30-2 
Flood Control 
2. AquillaLake,TX ........................ 30-3 
3. Bardwell Lake, TX ....................... 30-3 
4. Beals Creek, Big Spring, TX ............... 30-3 
5. BeltonLake,TX ........................ 30-4 
6. Benbrook Lake, TX ...................... 30-4 
7. Canyon Lake, TX. ...................... 30-4 
8. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX............. 30-4 
9. Ferrells Bridge Dam- 
Lake O' The Pines, TX .................. 30-6 
10. Grapevine Lake, TX .................. ... 30-6 
11. Hords Creek Lake, TX ..................... 30-6 
12. Joe Pool Lake, TX ....................... 30-6 
13. Lavon Lake, TX.......................... 30-7 
14. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork 
Channel Improvement, TX................ 30-7 
15. Lewisville Dam, TX. ...................... 30-7 
16. Navarro Mills Lake, TX ................... 30-8 
17. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX............. 30-8 
18. Proctor Lake, TX ........................ 30-8 
19. Ray Roberts Lake, TX. ................ . 30-8 
20. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX ..... 30-9 
21. San Gabriel River, TX. ................. . 30-9 
22. Somerville Lake, TX.................... 30-10 
23. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX ............... 30-10 
24. Waco Lake, TX......................... 30-10 
25. Waco Lake, TX (Dam Safety).............. 30-11 
26. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX ........ 30-11 
Navigation 
1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX 
The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act 
of 1965 (H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) consists of five 
major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tennessee 
Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork 
Floodway, and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last 
full report on the project as authorized, see Annual 
Report of 1978. The project information present herein is 
based on the tentatively selected project plan presented 
in the Draf General Design Memorandum. The plan consists 
of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, 
Tennessee Colony Lake, and Channel to Liberty in the lower 
basin. The estimated cost of the improvements is 
$1,060,000,000 including $44,000,000 non-Federal cost 
for land acquisition and relocation required for the local 
protection features (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). 
Operations during fiscal year. Channel to Liberty 
and Tennessee Colony Lake have been dormant for 
several years due to lack of local support. The Dallas 
Floodway Extension has advanced to the Preconstruction 
Flood Control (Cont) Page 
27. Inspection of Completed 
Flood Control Projects .................. 30-11 
28. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir 
Operations ............................ 30-11 
29. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.... 30-12 
30. Work Under Special Authorization......... 30-12 
Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 
31. Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX . ... 30-12 
32. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX ...... 30-12 
33. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, 
TX (Dam Safety) ....................... 30-12 
34. Town BluffDam- 
B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX ............... 30-13 
35. Whitney Lake, TX...................... 30-13 
General Investigations 
36. Surveys................................ 30-13 
37. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ... 30-13 
38. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 30-13 
Tables 
Table 30-A Cost and Financial Statement ..... 30-15 
Table 30-B Authorizing Legislation......... 30-19 
Table 30-C Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects ..................... 30-22 
Table 30-D Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects ............... 30-23 
Table 30-E Work Under Special 
Authorization .................. 30-24 
Engineering and Design stage and is described in 
Preconstruction Engineering and Design section. 
CHANNEL TO LIBERTY: 
Location. The Channel to Liberty begins at the 
Houston Ship Channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly 
direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou Channel 
turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake 
and then continues northward through the lake area 
along the course of the Trinity River to River Mile 45 above 
Liberty, Texas. 
Existing project. See Galveston,Texas District 
Annual Report writeup for existing project. 
Proposed project. The navigation portion of the 
channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 
feet and will extend from the Houston Ship Channel in 
Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Txas. The flood control 
portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 200 feet 
with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville 
Lake to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Estimated 
Federal cost of the improvements is $147,000,000 and 
estimated non-Federal cost is $44,000,000 for a total 
estimated cost of $191,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). 
30-2

FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: 
(a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all 
lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, 
operation and maintenance of the project, (b) accomplish, 
without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations 
and alterations to existing improvements, other than 
highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges 
required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain 
and operate the flood control portion of the channel 
upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d) reimburse the Federal 
Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated 
to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This 
reimbursement is presently estimated at $34,000, exclusive 
of interest. 
TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: 
Location. The Tennessee Colony dam site is located 
at River Mile 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles 
west of Palestine, Texas. The lake would extend into 
Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties, 
and would control a drainage area of 12,302 square 
miles.
Existing project. The plan of improvement provides 
for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum 
height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total 
embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete 
spillway. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 
3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 
acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres 
at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage 
includes 2,269,500 acre-feet for flood control, 1,040,000 
acre-feet for conservation, and 145,500 acre-feet for 
sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the improvement 
is $913,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required to 
reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to 
water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost 
allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. 
This reimbursement is presently estimated at $461,754,000 
for water supply and $9,533,000 for recreation (excluding 
future recreation facilities), for a total cost of $471,287,000, 
exclusive of interest. 
Flood Control 
2. AQUILLA LAKE, TX 
Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Texas, 
with the dam at River Mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest 
of Hillsboro, Texas, and about 24.0 miles north of Waco, 
ITexas. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvements and authorizing Acts see Annual Report 
for 1984. Construction was started March 1977, and 
project was ready for beneficial use April 29, 1983. 
Estimated cost is $46,100,000. 
Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, 
as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act 
of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. 
A contract with the Brazos RiverAuthority for water supply 
storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, June 
29,1976. To date, the Authority has paid $749,295 toward 
principal and $49,426 to operation and maintenance. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continue. 
Benefits accrued to Aquilla Lake project: Accumulated 
flood damages prevented through FY 1995 were $17,490,200. 
3. BARDWELL LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek, 5 river miles 
upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a 
tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of 
Ennis, Ellis County, Texas. 
Existing project. For a description of completed 
improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 
1969. Construction of project was started August 1963 and 
completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Estimated 
cost of project is $12,941,000. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse 
the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased 
water supply storage under the terms of the Water 
Supply Act of 1958. A contract was approved by the 
Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1963, and the Trinity 
River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all 
requirements of local cooperation. To date the authority 
has paid $1,164,345 toward principal and $1,509,633 
toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of 
project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
Benefits accrued to Bardwell Lake pmject: Accumulated 
flood damages prevented through FY 1995 were $10,952,500. 
4. BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRING, TX 
Location. Beals Creek, Big Spring, Texas is located 
in the city of Big Spring, Howard County, Texas on Beals 
Creek, a tributary of the Colorado River. 
Existing project. The Beals Creek Section 205 
Flood Control Project consists of construction of a channel 
to the north of and within a portion of the existing Beals 
Creek channel. The channel extends approximately 7,200 
feet from a point south of Channing Street and ends at 
the Benton Street Bridge. The channel is a trapezoidal grasslined 
channel with an average depth of 11 feet, a bottom 
width of 20 feet, and side slopes of 1 vertical to 3 horizontal. 
A grade control structure will be constructed at the 
eastern edge of Onelake to allow the proper drainage 
gradient while preserving the existing wetland environment 
in the Onemile Lake area. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 
1, 1995 base price) is $4,396,000; non-Federal cost for real 
estate and relocation of utilities is $1,550,000. Project is 
scheduled for completion in July 1997. 
Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation 
Agreement with the city of Big Spring was signed by the 
Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW) on March 10, 
1994. 
30-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Operations during fiscal year. The city has 
purchased the lands, easements and rights-of-way. A 
relocation contract was signed with the Union Pacific 
Railroad in May 1994 for the relocation of a spur bridge. 
Plans and specifications are continuing. 
5. BELTON LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles 
above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and 
about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. 
Existing project. For a description of completed 
improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 
1962. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready 
for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water supply pool: 
Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is 
complete. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a 
State agency, for remaining water supply storage in 
reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on 
January 15, 1958, at an estimated cost of $5,125,003. To 
date $1,619,780 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos 
River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of 
actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To 
date $2,551,620 has been paid. An interim contract with 
Brazos River Authority for emergency use of water supply 
storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Army 
on January 2,1957. Amount of $433,083 paid by authority 
on March 21, 1957 for use of these facilities was credited 
to interest and principal payable under formal water 
supply contract. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
Benefits accrued to Belton Lake project: Accumulated 
flood damages prevented through FY 1995 were 
$133,675,500. 
6. BENBROOK LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on 
Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from 
its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 
miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Texas. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 
1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and 
ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Estimated cost 
of project is $14,544,000. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. 
In 1956, Congress passed legislation enabling the city of 
Fort Worth to purchase conservation storage space in 
Benbrook Lake. Contracts have been negotiated with 
the city of Fort Worth and the Benbrook Water and 
Sewer Authority for the use of portions of the navigation 
storage for water supply purposes until such storage is 
required for Trinity River Navigation. To date $456,672 
has been paid by the city of Fort Worth and $151,617 by 
Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority. A cost sharing 
contract with the city of Benbrook for Recreation 
Development was approved by the Secretary of the Army 
May 20, 1977. To date, $19,888 has been paid. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook 
Lake, Clear Fork and West Fork Floodways: Accumulated 
flood damages prevented through FY 1995 are estimated 
at $2,396,052,500. 
7. CANYON LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is on Guadalupe River, 303 miles above 
its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, 
Comal County, Texas. 
Existing project. For a description of completed 
improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 
1969. Construction started April 1958 and project 
completed for beneficial use June 1964. Estimated cost of 
project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed 
by local interests. 
Hydropower. The Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority 
(GBRA) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission to construct a 6,070 kilowatt plant which is 
located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The 
project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no 
change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. 
GBRA has an agreement with the Pedernales Electric 
Cooperative for sale of power. Construction of the 
hydropower was completed in 1989 with non-Federal 
funds.
Local cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe-Blanco 
River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water 
supply and streamflow regulation for development of 
electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of 
Engineers on October 24, 1957, Guadalupe-Blanco River 
Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local 
cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was 
made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. The 
estimated cost of the water storage contract is about 
$9,000,000. To date $2,703,792 has been paid. In addition, 
$22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of 
reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority 
must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation 
and maintenance. To date $1,753,757 has been paid. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
Benefits accrued to Canyon Lake project: Accumulated 
flood damages prevented through FY 1995 were 
$100,730,600. 
8. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX 
Location. Cooper Dam is located in northeast 
Texas about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13.0 miles 
north of Sulphur Springs, and is at river mile 23.3 on the 
South Sulphur River. The South Sulphur River rises in 
Fannin County, Texas, and flows generally east for about 
30-4

FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 
80 miles to its confluence with the North Sulphur River 
to form the Sulphur River. 
Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement 
consists of a multipurpose reservoir with levee and 
channel improvements on the Sulphur River. The reservoir 
consists of a rolled earthfill dam with a maximum height 
of about 79 feet, 28,070 feet long at its crest, a single conduit 
10.5 feet in diameter, 530 feet long, two 10.5 foot by 4.75 
foot sluices, and a 700 foot wide uncontrolled concrete 
spillway. The reservoir surface area will be 22,740 acres 
at the top of the flood control pool, 19,305 acres at the top 
of the water supply pool, and 5,084 acres at the top of the 
sediment pool. The reservoir will contain 131,400 acrefeet 
of flood control storage, 273,000 acre-feet of municipal 
and industrial water supply storage, and 37,000 acre-feet 
of sediment storage. 
Construction of the project began in July 1958 and, 
to date, approximately 99 percent of the lands required 
for project construction have been acquired and 100 
percent of the levees and 100 percent of the channel 
work have been completed. Approximately 14.8 miles of 
the South Sulphur River and 6.3 miles of the Middle Sulphur 
River channels have been excavated. Approximately 3.4. 
miles of levee embankment on the South Sulphur River 
and 7.3 miles on the Middle Sulphur River have been 
constructed upstream of the Cooper Lake. About 10.5 miles 
of levee on the North Sulphur River, 8.2 miles of levee on 
the Sulphur River, 14 miles of levee on Cuthand Creek, 
and 4.2 miles of levee on Brushy Creek were strengthened; 
0.5 mile of levee on Kickapoo Creek was enlarged; and 15.3 
miles of new channel in Cuthand Creek, 0.8 mile of new 
channel in Brushy Creek, and 0.2 mile of cutoff channel 
in Kickapoo Creek were excavated; all downstream from 
Cooper Lake. 
Lack of funds and spending limitations prevented 
construction of the levees and channel work between 
April 1964 and February 1971. Construction was started 
again, however, in May 1971. The Texas Committee on 
Natural Resources, et. al., secured an injunction to halt 
construction on the project pending preparation of an 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), required by the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. A statement 
was prepared and filed on June 24, 1977. The plan 
recommended, in the Final EIS, minimized further 
construction of the authorized channels and provided for 
construction of the lake and downstream levees. The 
sufficiency of the Final EIS was challenged in the court 
and in December 1978 the U.S. District Court for the Eastern 
District of Texas ruled the statement inadequate, citing 
five deficiencies and halting all further construction. A 
Supplemental EIS to comply with the court's decision was 
prepared and filed with the Environmental ProtectionAgency 
in March 1981. The recommended plan of improvement 
consists of the multipurpose lake, 48.2 miles of levee, and 
the acquisition of 24,724 acres of wildlife mitigation 
lands. All remaining channel and levee work was deleted 
from the recommended plan. The Supplemental EIS 
was filed with the court in July 1981 and numerous 
motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were subsequently 
filed. ARfter the Supplemental EIS was filed in July 1981, 
numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs 
were filed through October 1982. On December 30, 1982, 
the U.S. District Court issued a 95-page order continuing 
the permanent injunction. On March 22, 1983, the order 
was revised and Judge William Wayne Justice issued an 
Amended Memorandum Opinion and a Permanent 
Injunction against the construction of Cooper Lake. The 
Government filed a Notice ofAppeal with the court in May 
1983. On July 16, 1984, litigation was resolved and the 
injunction was released. The project was transferred to 
the Fort Worth District at the end of Fiscal Year 1979. Public 
Law 101-101, H. R 101-235, approved September 29, 1989, 
authorized $5 million for additional recreation. Estimated 
Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1994 base price) is $143,000,000, non- 
Federal cost for land for the levees is $227,000 and in addition 
$54,600,000 is to be reimbursed by water supply users over 
a 50-year period. 
Local cooperation. Local interests (North Texas 
Municipal Water District, Sulphur River Municipal Water 
District, city of Irving) will utilize water impounded for 
present and future water supply. The total cost allocated 
to water supply to be reimbursed is $54,590,000. North 
Texas Municipal Water District, NTMWD, has contracted 
for 36.859 percent of the water supplystorage for future 
use with deferred payments for ten years. Under the contract 
NTMWD must pay 13.803 percent of actual annual cost 
of operation and maintenance. Sulphur River Municipal 
Water District, SRMWD, has contracted for 6.5 percent 
of the water supply storage for initial use and 19.78 
percent for future use for a total of 26.282 percent of the 
water supply storage.' T date $118,204 has been paid. Under 
the contract SRMWD must pay 2.435 percent of actual 
annual operation and maintenance. To date $20,683 has 
been paid. The city of Irving has contracted for 16.923 percent 
of the water supply storage for initial use and 19.936 for 
future use for a total of 36.859 of the water supply 
storage. To date $312,836 has been paid. Under the 
contract Irving must pay 6.337 percent of actual annual 
operation and maintenance. Tb date $73,123 has been paid. 
The Texas Parks and Wildlife and the Corps of 
Engineers have entered into or have agreed to formal 
Operation and Maintenance contracts for recreation 
facilities and wildlife conservation and management. Under 
the contracts for recreation facilities dated 7 November 
1988 and 11 September 1990, Texas Parks and Wildlife 
will be responsible for 100 percent of the operations 
and maintenance of two state parks that are being 
constructed with Federal funds. Under the contracts 
for wildlife conservation and management the state will 
be responsible for 24.14 percent of the operations, 
maintenance and replacement annual costs for areas 
totaling approximately 35,500 acres. The remaining 
balance will be the responsibility of the Project Sponsors 
and the Government. 
Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1995 
the State of Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 
awarded recreation contracts. Cooper Lake and Channels 
is approximately 96 percent complete overall. Major 
items completed through FY 1995 are Relocations of 
Railroads, 100 percent; Channels and Canals, 100 percent; 
30-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Levees and Floodwalls, 100 percent; and Lands and 
Damages, 99 percent. Land Acquisition, Engineering 
and Design and construction continues. Cooper Perimeter 
Wetland Contract was awarded in May 1995. Deliberate 
Impoundment began 29 September 1991 and project 
completion is scheduled for September 1996. 
Benefits accrued to Cooper Lake and Channels 
project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through 
FY 1995 are estimated at $3,065,700. 
9. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAMLAKE 
O' THE PINES, TX 
Location. Dam is on Cypress Creek in Marion, 
Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties,T'Ixas, 
8 miles west of Jefferson, Texas. 
Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet 
long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a 
capacity of 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls 
runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has 
a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet including 587200 
acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation 
storage, and 251,000 acre-feet for municipal and industrial 
water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. 
Project affords substantial flood protection of Cypress Creek 
Valley from damsite to confluence with Red River and, 
together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red 
River Basin, will provide flood protection along main 
stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Construction 
commenced in January 1955 and was completed June 1960. 
Estimated Federal cost of project is $17,231,700 (Oct. 1, 
1983, base price), including $4,349,200 for Code 711 and 
$399,739 accelerated Public Works fund. This project 
transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 
1979.
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
Benefits accrued to Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The 
Pines project: Accumulated flood damages prevented 
through FY 1995 were $12,367,800. 
10. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on 
Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its 
confluence with Elm Fork of Trinity River and about 20 
miles northwest of city of Dallas, Texas. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 
1962. Construction of project was started December 1947 
and ready for beneficial use in July 1952. Estimated 
cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 
contributed by local interests. A contract for modification 
of Embankment and Spillway was awarded September 
30, 1983 and completed Fiscal Year 1990. The improvements 
provided for spillway modification by construction of 
spillway chute and stilling basin and a berm on the 
downstream side of the main embankment. 
Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County 
Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District 
No. 2 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was 
approved by Secretary of the Army on March 21, 1955. Park 
Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with city of 
Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was 
approved by Secretary of the Army on March 17,. 1954. Dallas 
paid the required $1,433,026. A contract with city of 
Grapevine, Texas, for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply 
storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on 
September 14, 1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. A 
contract for Interim Use of Navigation Storage with city 
of Grapevine was approved by Secretary of the Army on 
February 27, 1981, at an estimated cost of $684,000. To 
date, $129,283 has been paid. Above contracts include 
payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: 
Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement 
District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, 
which part is to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3 ,000; 
Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, 
its pro rata part of actual annual cost (estimated at 
$79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). 
Following operation and maintenance payments have been 
made: Park Cities, $127,231; Dallas, $673,929; and 
Grapevine, $259,724. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continue. 
Benefits accrued to system comprised of Grapevine 
Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages 
prevented through FY 1995 were $3,716,381,900. 
11. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX 
Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan 
Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman, 'ITxas, and about 
27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hords Creek. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 
1962. Construction of project was started January 1947 
and completed for beneficial use in April 1948. Estimated 
cost of project is $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed 
by local interests. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
Benefits accrued to Hords Creek project: Accumulated 
flood damages prevented through FY 1995 were $937,000. 
12. JOE POOL LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam site is located at River Mile 11.2 on 
Mountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West 
Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city 
limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Thxas, which is one 
of the rapid growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth 
Metropolitan area. 
Existing project. The project provides for construction 
ofan earthfill dam with a maximum height of 108.5 feet 
above the streambed and a total length of 22,360 feet, 
30-6

FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 
including 50-foot type spillway, which will control 232 square 
miles of drainage area. The reservoir will have a total 
controlled storage of 304,000 acre-feet and a water surface 
area of 10,940 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 
7,470 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total 
storage includes 123,100 acre-feet for flood control, 
142,900 acre-feet for conservation and 38,000 acre-feet for 
sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the project 
$215,540,000 (Oct. 1, 1993 base price) including $11,350,000 
non-Federal first cost. Project is a unit in the general 
comprehensive plan for development and control of the 
water resources of the Trinity River Basin. 
Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 
as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act 
of 1965 apply. Contracts for water supply storage and 
recreation with the Trinity River Authority were approved 
by the Acting Secretary of the Army, June 15, 1977. The 
recreation contract with Trinity Valley Authority was 
modified March 28, 1979, to allow the Corps to participate 
with the State of Texas and approved by the Assistant 
Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Recreation 
development contract with the State of Texas was approved 
by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. 
Reimbursement is currently estimated at $57,240,000 for 
water supply and $19,840,000 for recreation (excluding 
future recreation facilities) for a total of $76,790,000 
exclusive of interest. To date $56,910 has been paid. Of 
the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, $16,803 
has been paid. 
Operations during fiscal year. The project has been 
under construction since FY 1975 and through FY 1995 
is approximately 99 percent complete overall. All major 
items are complete thru FY 1995 except for the state park 
recreation. Deliberate Impoundment began January 
1986. Project completion is scheduled for March 1996. Public 
Law 97-400, H.R. 7377, 97th Congress, effective December 
31, 1982, changed the name of Lakeview Lake to Joe Pool 
Lake.
Benefits accrued to Joe Pool Lake project: Accumulated 
flood damages prevented through FY 1995 were 
$510,735,200. 
13. LAVON LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East 
Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its confluence 
with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, 
Texas. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 
1962. Construction of project was started January 1948 
and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project 
is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake 
Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement 
authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. Estimated cost 
of project is $15,470,000. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water 
District for water supply storage, including cost of intake 
structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army July 8, 
1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was 
revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is 
$1,445,261.67. To date North Texas Municipal Water 
District has paid $4,075,556. Under the contract North 
Texas Municipal Water District must pay annually 13.6 
percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, 
and to date has paid $903,115. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
Benefits accrued to Lavon Lake project: Accumulated 
flood damages prevented through FY 1995 were 
$177,651,400. 
14. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND 
EAST FORK CHANNEL 
IMPROVEMENT, TX 
Location. Existing dam is in Collin County, Texas, 
on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its 
confluence with Trinity River and about 22.0 miles 
northeast of Dallas, Texas. Channel improvement of 
East Fork extends from its mouth to River Miles 31.8 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 
1988. Construction of project was initiated in May 1970 
and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Estimated 
Federal cost of the modification and improvement is 
$69,750,000 and $220,000 local interests, a total 'C 
$69,970,000. Project is complete. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse 
the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased 
water supply storage under the terms of the Water 
Supply Act of 1958. The North Texas Municipal Water 
District has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply 
(approved September 22, 1967, by the Secretary of the Army) 
and to date $233,420 has been paid. North Texas Municipal 
Water Supply District has submitted assurance to contract 
for 57 percent of future water supply. Reimbursement is 
currently estimated at $37,825,004. 
Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 
miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements 
as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
on January 28, 1972 and have furnished all necessary 
construction easements. 
Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise 
the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have 
declined to provide the necessary assurances. On December 
8, 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from 
"active" to "inactive" category. 
Operations during fiscal year. Improvement of 
the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel and Levees 
and total project are 100 percent complete. 
15. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX 
Loction. Dam is in Denton County, Texas, on Elm 
Fork of Trinity River 30 river miles above its confluence 
with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of city 
of Dallas, Texas at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. 
30-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 
1962. Construction of project was started November 
1948 and ready for beneficial use in November 1954. 
Estimated cost of project is $25,902,000, including 
$3,677,000 contributed by local interests. 
Hydropower: The city of Denton, Texas (COD) 
was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
to construct a 2,000 kilowatt plant which is located 
adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project 
operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change 
from the present operating regiment is anticipated. COD 
Utilities Department utilizes this power for its local 
customers. Construction of the hydropower was completed 
in 1991 with non-Federal funds. 
Local cooperation. A contract with city of Dallas 
for 415,000 acre-feet of water supply storage land rights 
and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved 
by the Secretary of the Army on July 16, 1953. Local 
contributions have been made in full. A contract with city 
of Denton, Texas, for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of water 
supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the 
Army on May 20, 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. 
Local contributions have been paid in full. Under above 
contracts, cities of Dallas and Denison must pay annually 
21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of 
operation and maintenance. To date Dallas has paid 
$3,788,438 and Denison $160,730. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville 
Lake; this inlcudes Ray Roberts Lake and Dallas Floodway 
Systems. Accumulated flood damages prevented through 
FY 1995 were $12,965,778,700. 
16. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Texas, at 
River Mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary of Trinity 
River, about 16.0 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report 
for 1965. Construction started December 1959 and project 
completed for beneficial use March 1963. Estimated cost 
of project $13,154,000 including $300,000 contributed by 
local interests. 
Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, 
as amended applies. A formal contract with the Tinity River 
Authority was approved March 3, 1966, by the Secretary 
of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. To date 
the Authority has paid $1,163,991 for water supply and 
$1,270,369 for operation and maintenance. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills Lake project: 
Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1995 
were $38,179,200. 
17. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary 
of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North 
Concho River near city of San Angelo, Texas. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 
1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and 
Reservoir to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake January 3, 1975 
by Public Law 93-634. Construction of project was started 
May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. 
Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938, applies. A water supply contract with Upper 
Colorado River Authority for water supply storage in 
reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on 
October 11, 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 
toward cost of project and $64,336 toward operation and 
maintenance for a 50-year period. The Authority must pay 
additional contributions of $1 a year for useful life of project, 
beginning January 1, 1965. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
Benefits accrued to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake 
project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through 
FY 1995 were $2,376,000. 
18. PROCTOR LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is at River Mile 238.9 on Leon 
River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8.0 miles 
northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Texas. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvement and authorization act see Annual Report of 
1969. Construction of project was started July 1960 and 
completed for beneficial use 1963. Estimated cost of 
project is $16,249,000. 
Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 
applies. A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, 
a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, 
July 1, 1960, and was modified and approved May 9, 1966, 
at an estimated cost of $1,707,900. Ib date the Authority 
has paid $504,407 for water supply and $508,880 for 
operation and maintenance. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance were continued. 
Benefits accrued to Proctor Lake project: Accumulated 
flood damages prevented through FY 1995 were $38,064,400. 
19. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX 
Location. Damsite is located at River Mile 60.0 on 
the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between 
Sanger and Aubrey, Texas and 30 miles upstream from 
Lewisville Dam. 
Existing project. The plan of improvement provides 
for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum 
height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 
feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 
30-8

FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 
100 feet long, controlling 682 square miles of drainage area. 
The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 
acre-feet, with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The 
total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for flood control, 
749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet 
for sediment reserve. The Water Resource Development 
Act of 1990 authorized the Greenbelt Corridor between 
Lewisville and Ray Roberts Lakes. Estimated Federal cost 
of the project is $317,300,000 (Oct. 1, 1995 base price). Public 
Law 96-384, 96th Congress, H.R. 8094, effective January 
4, 1981, changed the name ofAubrey Lake to Ray Roberts 
Lake.
Hydropower: At the request of the city of Denton 
and the approval of the Secretary of the Army, the 
penstock was added to the embankment as a minimum 
facility for future hydropower. The city of Denton, Texas 
(COD) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission to construct a 1,000 kilowatt plant which is 
located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The 
project operates izigonservai releases, ie., no change 
from the present operating regiment is anticipated. COD 
Utilities Department utilizes this power for its local 
customers. Construction of the hydropower was completed 
in 1991 with non-Federal funds. 
Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 
as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act 
of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. 
Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for 
water supply storage and recreation were approved by the 
Secretary of the Army September 16, 1980. To date the 
city of Dallas has paid $6,580,920 and the city of Denton 
has paid $2,325,790 toward principal. Dallas has paid 
$249,922 and Denton has paid $87,808 toward annual cost 
of operation and maintenance of project. 
Operations during fiscal year. The project is 
about 98 percent complete overall. Through FY 1995 
about 99 percent of the land acquisition, the road and utility 
relocations and the embankment, spillway and outlet works 
have been completed. Major work items remaining to be 
completed are fencing at Lewisville Lake, seepage control, 
recreational facilities, and the Greenbelt. Deliberate 
Impoundment began 30 June 1987 at Ray Roberts Lake, 
the pool raise at Lewisville Lake was 30 November 1988. 
The project is scheduled to be completed in July 1997. 
Benefits accrued to Ray Roberts Lake project: 
Accumulated flood damage prevented is shown in with 
Lewisville Dam, Tx. 
20. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL 
IMPROVEMENT, TX 
Location. Floodway is in city of San Antonio, Bexar 
County, Texas, on San Antonio River and San Pedro, 
Apache, Alazan, Martinez Creeks, and Espada Aqueduct 
located in vicinity of Six Mile Creek. 
Existing project. The project consists of 30.7 miles 
of channel and associated improvements on six separate 
streams. Completion of detailed engineering and design 
studies revealed that the least costly alternative for the 
remaining channel improvements would consist of two 
tunnels 120 feet below the surface each having an inside 
diameter of 24 feet and vertical intake, outlet and access 
shafts. The San Pedro Creek tunnel would be 6,040 feet 
in length and the San Antonio River tunnel would be 16,360 
feet in length. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications 
is $146,300,000 (Oct. 1, 1995 base price), and estimated 
cost to local interests is $65,200,000 which includes 
$3,800,000 cash contributions and $61,400,000 for lands, 
damages, and construction, a total of $210,400,000. 
Existing project was authorized by 1954 Flood ControlAct. 
The Water Resources Act of 1976 added authorization to 
the existing project for construction of flood control 
measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada 
Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. 
Construction was started in October 1957 and the project 
is about 99 percent complete. The Federal portion of the 
project is scheduled to be completed in March 1997. 
Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish 
lands and rights-of-way for construction, including 
purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or 
reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), 
channel dams where applicable, and utility lines; hold the 
United States free from damages; maintain and operate 
all works after completion; and provide a cash contribution 
for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal 
construction cost. San Antonio RiverAuthority furnished 
assurances that it will comply with all requirements of 
local cooperation. These assurances were accepted by the 
District Engineer on April 15, 1957. To date $6,811,330 
has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In 
addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, 
under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act 
of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio 
Channel. 
Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1995 
funds were used to continue construction and engineering 
and design studies. 
Benefits accrued to San Antonio project: Accumulated 
damages prevented through FY 1995 were $117,515,000. 
21. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TX 
Location. Project is a system of three reservoirs in 
Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River 
Basin, which consists of Granger Dam at River Mile 
31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7.0 miles east of Granger, 
Texas; North San Gabriel Dam at River Mile 4.3 on 
North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest 
of Georgetown, Texas; and South Fork Dam at River 
Mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.0 miles 
southwest of Georgetown, Texas. 
Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 
1954 Flood Control Act, and North (North San Gabriel Dam 
and Lake Georgetown) and South Fork Lakes were 
authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total 
Federal cost of project is $181,400,000 (Oct. 1, 1986, 
base price) and estimated non-Federal cost of $90,600,000 
for a project total of $272,000,000. Plan of improvement 
provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 
30-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
16,320 feet long, including spillway with maximum 
height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 
square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total 
storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acrefeet 
are for flood control, 37,900 acre-feet for water supply 
storage, and 44,100 acre-feet for sediment reserve. 
Estimated cost of project is $62,062,000. North San 
Gabriel Dam: A rockfill dam 6,700 feet long, including 
spillway with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, 
which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. 
Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acrefeet 
of which 87,600 acre-feet are for flood control, 29,200 
acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acre-feet 
for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is 
$38,765,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long, 
including spillway with maximum height of 152 feet 
above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of 
drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity 
of 82,600 acre-feet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water 
supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve). Estimated 
cost of project is $171,173,000. Public Law 96-575, 96th 
Congress, H.R. 4941 effective January 4, 1981, changed 
the name of North Fork Lake to North San Gabriel Dam 
and Lake Georgetown. 
Local cooperation. Construction is subject to 
condition that local interests reimburse the Federal 
Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, 
Lake Georgetown, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement 
currently estimated at $13,315,000 for Granger, $6,295,000 
for Lake Georgetown, and $50,563,000 for South Fork, for 
a total of $70,172,000 exclusive of interest. Brazos River 
Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor 
of project, and by letter dated April 18, 1966, indicated its 
acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its 
willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply 
in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply 
assurances for Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes 
were approved May 24, 1968 as satisfactory in accordanice 
with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as 
amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake 
will be deferred until the need for water supply develops 
and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. 
Operations during fiscal year. Through 1983 
all work has been completed. Deliberate impoundment of 
water commenced at Granger and Lake Georgetown 
Lakes on January 21, 1980 and March 3, 1980, respectively. 
In FY 1982, studies on South Fork Lake were resumed 
in preparation of General Design Memorandum to provide 
reaffirmation prior to construction. A Draft Reevaluation 
Report on South Fork Lake was submitted to headquarters 
in October 1986. The report recommended no Federal action 
and defer further studies indefinitely. Future water 
supply needs ofthe area would be addressed by reallocating 
storage at Granger Lake. The South Fork Lake project was 
placed on inactive status and would be eligible for 
deauthorization in FY 1997 if no funds are obligated by 
then.
Benefits accrued to project consisting of Granger and 
Lake Georgetown: Accumulated flood damages prevented 
through FY 1995 were $322,316,000. 
22. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream 
from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles 
south of Somerville, Texas. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 
1969. Construction started in June 1962 and the project 
was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Estimated 
cost of project is $30,227,000. 
Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, 
as amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River 
Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage 
approved May 10, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, has 
paid $1,981,937 to date. Also under the contract, the 
Authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual 
annual cost of operation and maintenance. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
Benefits accrued to Somerville Lake project: 
Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1995 
were $61,766,600. 
23. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX 
Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles 
upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary 
of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of 
Belton, Texas. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 
1969. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project 
was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Estimated 
cost of project is $23,670,000. 
Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 
applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State 
agency, for water supply storage was approved April 13, 
1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost 
of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $2,496,999. 
Also under the contract the Authority must pay annually 
27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation 
and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid 
$1,238,172. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Dam Project: 
Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through 
FY 1995 is $31,475,600. 
24. WACO LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles 
above its confluence with Brazos River, at city of Waco, 
McLennan County, Texas. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 
1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including 
$250,000 contributed by local interests and $2,500,000 other 
non-Federal cost. Construction was started in July 1958, 
30-10

FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 
and project was ready for beneficial use in February 
1965.
Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control 
Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos 
River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage 
and the contract with the city of Waco transferring the 
existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water 
storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 
15, 1958. lb date, the Authority for their portion of the water 
supply storage has paid $2,537,797. Also under the 
contract the Authority and the city must pay 14.706 and 
2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation 
and maintenance. 'Ib date the Authority has paid $1,220,408 
and the city has paid $186,701. A contract with the 
Brazos RiverAuthority, for additional storage for municipal 
and industrial water supply, was approved by the Acting 
Assistant Secretary of the Army, September 28, 1984. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations 
and maintenance continued. 
Benefits accrued to Waco Lake project: Accumulated 
flood damages prevented through FY 1995 were 
$117,421,200. 
25. WACO LAKE, TX (DAM SAFETY) 
Location. For location of completed dam see Waco 
Lake, Texas in this chapter. 
Existing project. The existing rolled earthfill 
embankment's top elevation of 510 feet National Geodetic 
Vertical Datum (NGVD), is hydrologically deficient. The 
original hydrologic design criteria used for Waco Dam design 
has been revised. Current hydrologic design criteria 
indicates the spillway and outlet works cannot pass the 
Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) without overtopping the 
dam by 1.0 foot, which could lead to failure of the 
embankment and catastrophic release of the reservoir. 
Adding required freeboard, Waco Dam crest height is 
hydrologically deficient by 5.1 feet. The proposed 
modification consists of raising the dam crest approximately 
by 5 feet to 515 feet NGVD utilizing a combination of 
compacted earthfill and reinforced cast-in-place concrete 
parapet wall for the full length of the dam. No major 
modification to the spillway, spillway service bridge, 
outlet works tower, or outlet works tower service bridge 
will be required. However, the spillway hoist mechanisms 
for the tainter gates will be waterproofed. The outlet 
works service bridge will be provided with a removeable 
bulkhead to be installed only during large flood events but 
would otherwise remain unchanged. Estimated Federal 
cost for raising the dam modification is $9,120,000 (Oct. 
1, 1995, base price) and $230,000 is to reimbursed by local 
sponsors. 
Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1995 
funds were used to initiate engineering and design under 
the Design Memorandum. The Design Memorandum is 
scheduled to be completed in November of 1996. Plans and 
Specifications scheduled to be completed in January 
1998 and project construction scheduled to be completed 
March 2001. 
26. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND 
LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is on Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie 
Counties, Texas. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur 
River, and about 8 miles southwest of Texarkana, Texas. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 
1984. Estimated cost of project is $51,945,000 which 
includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated 
public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by 
local interests, over a period not to exceed 50 years, for 
water supply storage, and including $2,092,040 for pro rata 
share of original reservoir cost. Construction was initiated 
in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real 
estate activities, construction under Code 711, and 
conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage 
after completion of Cooper Reservoir. This project 
transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 
1979.
Local cooperation. A contract with the city of 
Texarkana, Texas, for reserving water supply storage 
space was approved by the Secretary of the Army December 
17, 1968. ToIb date, the city has paid $673,877. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
Benefits accrued to Wright Patman Dam and Lake 
project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through 
FY 1995 were $13,859,000. 
27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Inspection of completed local flood protection projects 
is made periodically in compliance with Section 208.10, 
of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains 
regulations for operation and maintenance of local floodprotection 
works approved by the Secretary of the Army 
in accordance with authority in Section 3, Flood Control 
Act of June 22, 1936. See Table 30-D for inspections 
made this fiscal year. 
Inspection costs for FY 1995 from regular funds 
for maintenance were $73,972. Total costs to September 
30, 1995 were $1,231,910. 
28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL 
RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 
In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944, 
expenditures were made for scheduling flood control 
reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation 
manual for Marshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, 
near city ofAustin,'l Texas, and for preparation of reservoir 
regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and 
South Concho Rivers near city of San Angelo, Texas. 
Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and 
Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of 
Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was 
completed during FY 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was 
authorized for construction by Department of Interior by 
30-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated 
in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; 
deliberate impoundment was started January 23, 1963. 
Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford 
Reservoir through FY 1995 were $254,116,000 and by Twin 
Buttes through FY 1995 were $418,000. Twin Buttes 
Reservoir consists of two separate pools, one on South Concho 
River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring 
Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at 
elevation 1925.0. Costs for FY 1995 from regular funds 
for operation of both reservoirs were $100,495. 
29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Table 30-C.) 
30. WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
(See Table 30-E.) 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 
Public Law 585, 80th Congress, as amended 
(preauthorization); emergency streambank protection 
under Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as 
amended; Snagging and Clearing of navigable streams and 
tributaries in interest of flood control Section 208, Public 
Law 780, 83rd Congress, as amended. Emergency flood 
control, hurricane-flood, and shore protection activities 
(Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). 
Fiscal year costs were $15,510,302 for disaster 
preparedness; no levee repair. 
Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power 
31. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS 
HYDROPOWER, TX 
Location. For location of completed dam see Town 
BluffDam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas in this chapter. 
Existing project. Installation of hydroelectric 
power generating facilities at Town Bluff Dam was 
authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1945 (Public 
Law 79-14), March 2, 1945, but deferred in the original 
construction. Town BluffDam was completed and placed 
in operation in 1951. A Design Analysis Report completed 
in April 1982 and a Feasibility Report was approved 
September 9, 1983 indicated that installing hydropower 
at this project was economically feasible. The hydropower 
facilities include a 7,400 kilowatt power plant (two units 
at 3,700 kilowatts each), intake and outlet facilities, and 
necessary switchgear equipment is located in the main 
embankment at the old diversion channel. The plant is 
operated remotely from the Sam Rayburn project. The project 
produces an estimated 35,900 megawatt hours of energy 
per year. There is no Federal cost on this project. It is 
completely funded by non-Federal funds. The estimated 
non-Federal cost is $18,900,000. 101st Congress House 
Report 923, effective February 7, 1989, changed the 
name of Town Bluff Hydropower to Robert Douglas Willis 
Hydropower. 
Local cooperation. A contract with the Sam 
Rayburn Municipal Power Authority was approved by 
Secretary of the Army, June 28, 1985, relative to financing, 
escrow agreement, and power sales agreement. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
32. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND 
RESERVOIR, TX 
Location. Dam is on Angelina River 25.2 miles 
upstream from its confluence with Neches River and 
about 10.0 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report 1969. 
Construction was started August 1956 and project was ready 
for beneficial use in March 1965. Estimated cost of project 
is $68,683,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local 
interests. 
Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower 
Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute 
$3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional 
$200,000 annually for 50 years afer completion of the project 
was approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 
22, 1957. Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in full and 
annual payments to date of $4,800,000 have been made 
by the Authority. 
A contract with the city of Lufkin for water supply 
storage was approved May 27, 1969 by the Secretary of 
the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date the city 
has paid $196,358. Also under the contract the city of Lufkin 
must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of 
operation and maintenance. To date the city has paid 
$175,425. 
Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine 
operation and maintenance. 
Benefits accrued to Sam Rayburn project:Accumulated 
flood damages prevented through FY 1995 were 
$370,579,400. 
33. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND 
RESERVOIR, TX (DAM SAFETY) 
Location. For location of completed dam see Sam 
Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Texas in this chapter. 
Existing project. The existing 2200-foot wide 
uncontrolled spillway is constructed through erodible 
loose sand, shaley clay, and sandstone. Based on experience 
of significant erosion at other uncontrolled and unlined 
spillways constructed through less erodible material, 
the spillway at Sam Rayburn Dam would experience 
severe erosion damage and probably breach during 
passage of floods in excess of the 150-year flood frequency 
(25 percent of Probable Maximum Flood). The modification 
of the spillway consists of constructing a new reinforced 
concrete weir, stilling basin and outfall channel near 
the existing spillway structure. The proposed weir would 
have a width of 640 feet, an overall length of433 feet, an 
outfall channel approximately 5,000 feet long and a crest 
30-12

FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 
elevation of 176.0 feet NGVD. Estimated Federal cost for 
the spillway modification is $36,614,000 (Oct 1, 1995, base 
price) and $1,350,000 is to be reimbursed by hydropower 
sponsors. 
Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1995 
funds were used to continue construction on the spillway 
modification and parapet wall and engineering and 
design. The project is scheduled for completion in 
November 1996. 
34. TOWN BLUFF DAMB.
A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles 
below mouth of Angelina River, one-half mile north of Tobwn 
Bluff, Texas, and 93.0 river miles north of Beaumont, T'xas. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 
1962. Construction started March 1947 and project was 
ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Estimated cost of 
project is $9,888,000, including $2,000,000 contribution 
by local interests. 
Local cooperation. Completed as required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 
and maintenance continued. 
35. WHITNEY LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles 
above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest of Whitney, Texas, 
and about 38 miles upstream from city of Waco, Texas. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 
1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and 
ready for flood control use in December 1951. First power 
was placed on-the-line in June 1953. Raise power pool is 
complete. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. 
Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 
1938, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, 
a State agency, for water supply storage was approved by 
the Secretary of the Army November 3, 1982. Tb date, the 
Authority has paid $249,191. 
Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine 
operation and maintenance. 
Benefits accrued to Whitney Lake project: Accumulated 
flood damages prevented through FY 1995 were 
$232,831,600. 
General Investigations 
36. SURVEYS 
Fiscal year costs were $879,241 for flood damage 
prevention studies; $90,468 for coordination with other 
agencies; $37,640 for reviewed of deferred projects; $0 for 
review of completed projects; $1,490,491 for environmental 
services partnerships; $62,433 for miscellaneous activities; 
and for a total of $2,560,273. 
37. PRECONSTRUCTION 
ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TX; 
Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity 
River in the city of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. The plan 
of improvement provides for extending the existing 
Floodway downstream about 9 miles to the confluence of 
the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The plan consists 
of a leveed floodway and flood conveyance improvement 
(channel) along the main stem, Five Mile Creek and 
White Rock Creek. Maintained free of encroachments, the 
levees and channels would provide Standard Project 
Flood protection for approximately 7,300 acres of urban 
lands currently subject to flooding. The estimated planning 
and engineering estimate is $4,080,000. Planning and 
engineering studies were initiated in FY 1991. Fiscal year 
costs were $265,291. 
SHOAL CREEK (HANCOCK CREEK), AUSTIN, TX: 
Hancock Creek, a tributary to Shoal Creek, Austin, 
Texas, flows through a highly urbanized area of Austin. 
The authorized project will consist of approximately 
4,700 feet of grass-lined channel, concrete-lined channel, 
and selective clearing along Hancock Creek from Houston 
Street to its confluence with Shoal Creek with bottom widths 
varying between 25 and 50 feet. The project will also include 
alteration to or replacement of three highway bridges, 
construction of a 10-foot by 10-foot box culvert to divert 
flows around a shopping center, relocation of utility lines, 
and acquisition of approximately 4 acres of lands and 
easements for construction purposes. The estimated 
planning and engineering estimate is $780,000. Planning 
and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1992. Fiscal 
year costs were $10,802. The city of Austin, Texas has 
requested this project be put on hold until the city is able 
to secure necessary funds. 
38. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
BASIC DATA 
Work was continued under the Flood Plain 
Management Services on the compilation of information 
on floods and potential flood damages, including identification 
ofthose areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures 
for these activities totaled $237,314. Fiscal year costs were 
$29,772 for hydrologic studies. 
30-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
This page intentionally left blank. 
30-14

FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 
TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost To 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 19957 
1. Trinity River Project, 
TX Includes Channel to 
Liberty, Tennessee 
Colony Lake, and Dallas 
Floodway Extension 
2. Aquilla Lake, TX 
3. Bardwell Lake, TX 
4. Beals Creek, 
Big Spring, TX 
5. Belton Lake, TX 
6. Benbrook Lake, TX 
7. Canyon Lake, TX 
8. Cooper Lake and 
Channels, TX 
(Contributed Funds) 
9. Ferrells Bridge Dam- 
Lake O' The Pines, TX 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost: 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
- 22,574,865 
- 22,574,865 
544,000 
600,262 
551,000 
537,052 
943,000 
686,922 
- 45,506,300 
- 45,506,300 
581,500 6,257,607 
770,640 6,149,408 
- - - - 10,934,505 
- - - - 10,934,505 
1,964,000 1,205,500 1,797,000 1,150,300 23,568,62218 
1,977,376 1,181,948 1,825,524 1,118,165 22,347,835" 
- 430,000 
- 251,428 
470,000 
545,392 
900,000 
796,820 
- - - - 16,960,549 
- - - - 16,960,5491 
2,845,000 2,741,000 2,733,000 2,056,800 35,218,90918 
2,398,521 3,202,582 2,759,446 2,027,560 35,060,4801 
- - - - 13,130,463 
- - - - 13,069,9912 
1,495,000 1,439,000 2,122,000 1,526,200 30,503,53518 
1,557,277 1,413,343 2,134,845 1,457,542 28,985,07118 
- - - - 19,088,524g 
- - - - 19,088,524 
1,544,000 1,438,000 1,763,600 1,872,400 24,461,50418 
1,397,919 1,557,630 1,748,915 1,875,076 24,138,62318 
9,102,000 10,473,000 7,200,000 3,047,000 137,642,887 
11,132,249 9,518,230 8,562,318 3,456,602 135,357,988 
- - - - 227,000 
- - - - 227,000 
541,000 
520,741 
719,000 818,000 1,748,000 
704,853 799,893 1,648,229 
3,831,000 
3,673,716 
- 14,175,197' 
- 14,175,1975" 
2,276,000 2,072,000 2,798,000 2,054,500 
2,257,701 2,066,249 2,673,620 2,123,787 
39,614,52518 
39,467,29918 
30-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section 'Total Cost To 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 199517 
10. Grapevine Lake, TX 
11. Hords Creek Lake, TX 
12. Joe Pool Lake, TX 
13. Lavon Lake, TX 
14. Lavon Lake Modification 
and East Fork Channel 
Improvement, TX 
15. Lewisville Dam, TX 
16. Navarro Mills Lake, TX 
17. O.C. Fisher Dam and 
Lake, TX 
18. Proctor Lake, TX 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Aprop. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
- - - - 21,317,790 
- - - - 21,317,790 
1,665,600 1,720,800 1,981,600 1,687,000 35,252,33918 
1,625,900 1,712,282 2,048,010 1,597,687 35,123,19918 
928,000 
954,698 
426,000 
595,234 
555,000 
557,343 
2,721,000 
2,138,896 
- - - 2,731,0898 
- - - 2,731,089 
843,000 964,950 1,098,050 16,750,21718 
836,038 999,910 1,065,184 16,631,25418 
894,000 
641,036 
612,000 
588,344 
152,000 
320,401 
1,241,000 
988,169 
2,453,000 2,761,900 
3,090,418 2,657,652 
94,374 
706,800 
937,495 
2,049,400 
2,127,500 
188,960,000 
188,873,954 
5,722,408 
5,642,280 
12,864,796 
12,864,796 
40,080,23618 
40,017,266 18 
_ 69,796,862 
_ 69,796,862 
2,950,600 
2,889,361 
1,283,500 
1,246,410 
1,258,000 
1,230,446 
1,369,000 
1,294,068 
2,099,500 
2,126,866 
1,183,100 
1,255,897 
1,129,000 
1,109,503 
1,944,000 
1,808,845 
2,348,000 
2,261,609 
1,691,600 
1,685,954 
1,584,000 
1,485,677 
4,219,400 
4,458,311 
2,054,600 
2,173,121 
1,034,200 
982,783 
1,062,975 
1,113,091 
1,432,400 
1,404,795 
25,333,988 
25,333,988' 
50,957,18518 
48,254,01518 
9,846,759 
9,846,75911 
22,219,81318 
22,123,89118 
16,027,467 
16,027,467 
20,470,90018 
20,331,54018 
14,469,585 
14,469,585 
26,792,73918 
26,506,41718 
30-16

FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 
TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section lbtal Cost lb 
in Tlxt Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30,1995" 
19. Ray Roberts Lake, TX 
31. Robert Douglas Willis 
Hydropower, TX 
(Contributed Funds) 
32. Sam Rayburn Dam and 
Reservior, TX 
33. Sam Rayburn Dam and 
Reservoir, TX (Dam 
Safety) 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
20. San Antonio Channel 
Improvement, TX 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
21. San Gabriel River, TX 
Granger 
Lake Georgetown 
22. Somerville Lake, TX 
23. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, 
TX 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contri. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Aprop. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
4,534,000 
5,900,903 
601,000 
635,492 
1,255 
4,117,000 
4,328,933 
697,000 
712,744 
8,600,000 
9,519,329 
1,312,000 
976,883 
5,695,000 
5,334,718 
798,200 
1,094,670 
310,166,700 
309,383,494 
5,349,602 
5,283,122 
- 18,672,000 
- 18,628,463 
- 60,670,957 
- 60,670,957 12 
4,553,279 3,565,000 5,843,000 3,526,500 
4,502,139 3,051,502 5,889,066 3,687,148 
884,000 1,304,000 10,770,000 13,468,000 
1,049,007 1,331,960 8,183,421 11,699,241 
- '3,487 
- 56,235 
15,000,000 
16,762,775 
668,955 
668,955 
5,791,000 
5,772,925 
805,621 
564,911 
2 58 000 
2,),538 
67,204 
220,666 
107,639 
7,300,000 
7,487,355 
3,300,000 
3,272,970 
62,025,03318 
61,226,287 18 
27,026,000 
22,543,283 
181,126 
56,235 
139,803,048 
139,796,764 
6,811,330 
6,784,300 
- 101,796,100 
- 101,796,100 
1,774,000 
1,751,570 
1,141,000 
1,134,548 
1,247,000 
1,249,429 
1,134,000 
1,158,318 
1,457,000 
1,416,971 
1,299,500 
1,317,434 
1,184,850 
1,212,836 
1,211,300 
1,200,344 
17,075,80118 
17,011,487i 
15,759,62318 
15,719,69018 
- 27,790,438 
- 27,790,438 
2,127,500 1,966,800 2,479,000 1,911,350 
2,170,664 2,114,277 2,267,417 2,114,655 
35,961,488" 
33,403,42618 
- 20,522,0841 
- 20,522,084 
1,352,000 1,616,000 1,822,950 1,365,000 
1,278,094 1,654,630 1,875,237 1,345,714 
22,722,49718 
22,612,13018 
30-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost lbTo 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 199517 
34. Town Bluff Dam- New Work: 
B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Approp. - - - - 6,602,737 
TX Cost - - - - 6,602,73714 
Maint. 
Approp. 1,055,621 1,229,000 1,448,000 1,261,500 21,956,95718 
Cost 1,049,431 1,141,331 1,540,534 1,223,596 21,812,44218 
24. Waco Lake, TX New Work: 
Approp. - - - - 49,521,12115 
Cost - - - - 49,521,121 
Maint 
Approp. 1,815,000 1,980,000 3,205,500 2,125,250 35,544,26418 
Cost 1,813,450 2,037,952 2,766,048 2,457,946 35,306,78818 
25. Waco Lake, TX New Work: 
(Dam Safety) Approp. - - - 200,000 200,000 
Cost - - - 33,642 33,642 
35. Whitney Lake, TX New Work: 
Approp. - - - - 42,952,938 
Cost - - - - 42,952,93816 
Maint. 
Approp. 2,897,000 2,923,000 3,980,000 3,832,300 59,317,96418 
Cost 3,158,294 2,863,593 3,911,727 3,284,113 58,222,246 1 
26. Wright Patman Dam New Work: 
and Lake, TX Approp. - - - - 35,731,626 
Cost - - - - 35,731,626 
Maint. 
Approp. 1,577,000 1,779,000 3,740,200 2,185,625 38,496,77018 
Cost 1,728,512 1,847,306 3,317,209 2,515,359 38,329,88518 
' Excludes $47,309 receipts from reconveyance of land 
deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 
: Excludes $322,346 receipts from reconveyance of land 
deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 
s Excludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from 
contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" 
for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. 
'Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 
713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. 
Excludes $1,711,200 contributed funds. 
s Includes $1,376,322 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 
713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. 
Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1973. 
6 Claim Northeast Texas Municipal Water District 
$16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real estate charges 
of $1,325, making a total of $2,811 reimbursed in Fiscal 
Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1974. 
' Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land 
deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new 
work expended from contributed funds. 
8 Excludes $105,079 expended from contributed funds. 
9 Excludes receipts from reconveyance of land of $426,606 
which were deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $3,676,661 
for new work expended from contributed funds. 
10 Includes $130,000 under appropriation 96X5125. 
11E xcludes $300,000 expended from contributed funds. 
1 Excludes $3,000,000 expended from contributed funds. 
18 Includes receipts from disposals and revocation of 
funds related thereto. 1 Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. 
15 Excludes $2,750,000 expended for contributed funds. 
16 Excludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of lands 
deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 
'~ Includes funds provided by the Jobs Act (PL 98-8, 
dated March 24, 1983). 
18 Beginning Fiscal Year 1985 data shown on Table A includes 
Special Recreation Use Fees. Data for previous fiscal years 
have been changed to conform to the new procedure. 
30-18

FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 
TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. 
Aug. 13, 1968 
Mar. 31, 1960 
Oct. 12, 1972 
Jul. 24, 1946 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Aug. 3, 1955 
Jul. 24, 1946 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Aug. 18, 1941 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Mar. 2, 1945 
30-19 
AQUILLA LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek, about 6.8 miles 
southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north 
of Waco, Texas. 
BARDWELL LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 
miles south of Ennis, Texas. 
BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRING, TX 
Construction of a channel. 
BELTON LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 3 miles 
north of Belton, Texas. 
Modification of the dam to provide for generation of 
hydroelectric power. 
BENBROOK LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity 
River about 10 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. 
CANYON LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 
miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. 
COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX 
Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. 
FERRELLS BRIDGE DAMLAKE 
O' THE PINES, TX 
Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam and 
reservoir area. 
GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on Denton Creek, a tributary of 
the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas, 
Texas. 
HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on Hords Creek, a tributary of 
Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. 
JOE POOL LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to 
the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles 
above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. 
LAVON LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on the East Fork of the Trinity 
River, about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. 
S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc 424, 82nd Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 115, 92nd Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc, 247, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc 488, 83rd Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 370, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
9. 
10. 
11. 
12. 
13.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1996 
TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
14. Oct. 23, 1962 
Mar. 7, 1974 
15. Mar. 2, 1945 
16. Sep. 3, 1954 
17. 
Dec. 31, 1970 
Aug. 18, 1941 
18. Sep. 3, 1954 
19. Oct. 27, 1965 
32. Mar. 2, 1945 
33. Mar. 2, 1945 
20. Sep. 3, 1954 
21. Sep. 3, 1954 
Jan. 3, 1975 
22. Sep. 3, 1954 
LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK 
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX 
Enlarge Lavon Dam and enlargement and realignment of 
the lower 25 miles of the East Fork of the Trinity River, 
including rehabilitation of existing levees. 
Improvement of Collin County Road 115. 
LEWISVILLE DAM, TX 
Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River 
near the city of Lewisville, Texas. 
NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on Richland Creek, a tributary of 
the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of 
Corsicana, Texas. 
Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. 
O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just 
above San Angelo, Texas. 
PROCTOR LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 8 miles 
northeast of Comanche, Texas. 
RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity 
River between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas, about 30 
miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Dam. 
SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX 
Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 
miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. 
SAM RAYBURN SPILLWAY (DAM SAFETY 
ASSURANCE), TX 
Modification of the spillway and embankment. 
SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX 
Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and 
tributaries in and near the city of San Antonio, Texas. 
SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TX 
Construction of: (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on 
the San Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, 
Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the north Fork 
of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of 
Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on 
the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles 
southwest of Georgetown, Texas. 
SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on Yegua Creek about 2 miles 
south of Somerville, Texas. 
H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doe. 403, 77th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 498, 83rd Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., 
lst Sess. 
H. Doe. 35, 81st Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doe.276, 89th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 
2nd Sess. and 
H Doc. 591, 87th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
30-20

FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 
TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
23. 
34. 
31. 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Aug. 18, 1941 
Jul. 24, 1946 
STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX 
Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 
miles southwest of Belton, Texas. 
TOWN BLUFF DAM-B.A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, 
Texas. 
ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX 
Construction of two units at 3,000 kilowatts each of 
hydroelectric power generating facilities connected with 
'bwn Bluff-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas. 
TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX 
Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river 
mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of 
Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel from the 
Houston, Texas ship ohannel to Fort Worth, Texas; a 
distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the 
existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream 
approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and 
enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinty River from 
the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Fort Worth, 
Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; 
and water conveyance facilities involving construction 
of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony 
Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. 
WACO LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, 
Texas, below the confluence of the North, South, and 
Middle Bosque Rivers. 
WACO LAKE, TX (Dam Safety) 
Modification of raising the dam crest. 
WHITNEY LAKE, TX 
Construction of a dam on the Brazos River, about 19 miles 
southwest of Hillsboro, Texas. Raise the power pool 13.0 
feet. 
WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX 
Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir. 
30-21 
H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 
1st Sess., and 
H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc, 390, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc, 602, 79th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
1. 
24. 
25. 
35. 
26.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
TABLE 30-C (See Section 28 of Text) 
For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1995 
Report See 
Annual Report Operation and 
Project For Construction Maintenance 
Belton Lake Modification, TX3 1988 - - 
Big Fossil Creek, TX' 1969 - - 
Big Sandy Lake, TX6 1986 - - 
Big Spring, TX2 1979 - - 
Boggy Creek, Austin, TX' 1992 - - 
Brownwood Channel Improvment, TX5 - - - 
Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX' 1979 - - 
Dam "A" Lake, TX5 1987 - - 
Duck Creek Channel Improvment, TX' 1983 - - 
Elm Fork Floodway, TX5 1987 - - 
Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX' 1971 - - 
Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX' 1971 - - 
Grand Prairie, TX (Landfill)' 1987 - - 
Grand Prairie, TX (Meyers Road) 1989 - - 
Greenville, TX' 1983 - - 
Lake Brownwood Modification, TX' 1983 - - 
Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX5 - - 
Millican, TX' 1988 - - 
Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX5 - - - 
Roanoak Lake, TX' 1979 - - 
Rockland Lake, TX' 1988 - - 
Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, TX' 1969 - - 
Zacate Creek Channel, TX' 1983 - - 
Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX' 1986 - - 
'Recommended for Deauthorization 'Deauthorized 
30-22 
'Completed 2Inactive 3Deferred

FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
TABLE 30-D (See Section 26 of Text) 
Location Dates of Inspection 
Beltline Road Bridge, Richardson .......................................................... Oct. 25, 1995 
Big Fossil Creek ............................................................................ May 23, 1995 
Boggy Creek, Austin ........................................................... Apr. 21, 1995 
Calloway Branch, Hurst ...................................................................... Oct. 12, 1995 
Cat Claw Creek, Abilene ..................................................................... Sep. 7, 1995 
Dallas Floodway ............................ ........... ............... ................ Nov. 3, 1995 
East Fork ........................................................................ Jul.20 & Nov. 30, 1994 
Fort Worth Floodway ...................................................................................... Oct.4-5, 1995 
Grand Prairie Landfill ....................................................................... Feb., 22,1995 
Grand Prairie Meyers Road. ................... ................................... Feb. 25,1994 
Long Branch, Greenville ......................................................... .. Oct.19, 1995 
Lorean Branch, Hurst ......................................................................... Oct.12,1995 
Meyers Road, Grand Prairie .......................................................... Feb.22,1995 
Munday ....................................................... .. .......................... Nov.9,1995 
Park Row Bridge, Arlington .......................................................................... Nov. 1,1995 
Pleasanton ............................................................................................ Jun. 5,1995 
Poteet ....................... ............................................... Jun. 6,1995 
Ridglea C. C. Dr. Bridge, Fort Worth ........................................................ Jan. 24, 1995 
San Antonio Floodway ............................ :...................................... Jun. 12-13, 1995 
San Antonio Tunnels......................................................... Jul. 20,1995 
Singing Hills Creek, Watauga ....................................................... Dec. 6, 1995 
Walnut Creek, Seguin .................................................................. Nov. 16,1994 
Wheeler Creek, Gainsville ................. ...................................... Jun. 28, 1995 
Zacate Creek, Laredo ....................................................... . Dec. 20, 1994 
30-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 30-E 
Project 
WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
(See Section 29 of Text) 
Flood Control Activities - Section 205 Cost 
Arlington, Grand Prairie, TX ........................................................ ....... $ 
Browder Creek, Springton, TX ................................................................. 
Calloway Branch, Richland Hills, TX ......................................................... 
Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX............................ ..................... 
Dry Branch Creek, Grand Prairie, TX ......................................................... 
Duck Creek, Garland, TX ............................ ....................................... 
Farmers Branch, White Settlement, TX............................................ .. ....... 
Greentree, Subdiv., Midland Draw, TX............................................................... 
Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie, TX ................................................................................. 
Midland/Jal Draw, Midland, TX ................................................ .............. 
Oak St. Bridge, Midland, TX .................................................................. 
Perry Rd., Hutton Br., Carroll, TX.............................................................. 
Pole Cat Creeks, Lacoste, TX ............................................................... 
Rush Creek, Arlington, TX ................................................................ 
Singing Hills Creek, Watauga, TX.................. ........................................... 
South Pole Cat Creeks, Lacoste, TX ........................................................... 
Sulphur Branch, Euless, TX .................................................................. . 
Ten Mile Creek, De Soto, TX ....................................................... 
Ten Mile Creek, Lancaster, TX .......................................................................................................... 
Upper Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX ............................................................ 
131,104 
9,047 
845,657 
30,814 
40,281 
343,819 
9,741 
16,195 
1,021,684 
24,097 
24,147 
16,728 
27,737 
692,465 
129,714 
34,640 
2,345,173 
36,738 
20,595 
1,283,768 
Project Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 Cost 
Bear Creek, County Rd. 485, Collin, TX ........................................................ $ 45,879 
Bridge, Mary Creek, TX .................................. ...................... ...... (-) 10,386 
Dudley Branch, Hebron Parkway, Carroilton, TX........................................... .... 41,155 
Furneaux Creek, Carrollton, TX ............................................................... 3696 
Hutton Bridge, Reach H. Stream, TX ............. . ........... ................................... 26,626 
Roaring Springs Rd., Bridge, TX .................... . ................. ................. 251,876 
Washington on Brazos State Park, TX ........................................................................ 0 
Project Snagging and Clearing of Flood Control - Section 208 Cost 
Atascosa River, Pleasanton, FL............................................................. $ 1,967 
30-24

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT *
Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all 
short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and 
flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including the entire 
basin of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, 
Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It 
embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek 
Basins draining into Baffin Bay, and coastal area south 
thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary 
of Starr County, Texas. It includes lower basins of major 
streams flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, 
Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 
190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River 
downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity 
River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing 
at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from 
confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River 
downstream from northern boundary of Fayette County; 
Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San 
Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from 
confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River 
downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa 
River. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation 
1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern 
Division)........................ 
2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX ............ 
3. Cedar Bayou, TX .................. 
4. Channel to Part Bolivar, TX ........... 
5. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ....... 
6. Freeport Harbor, TX................ 
7. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX ..... 
8. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between 
Apalachee Bay, FL, and the Mexican 
Border.......................... 
9. Houston Ship Channel, TX ........... 
10. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX .......... 
11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX .......... 
12. Texas City Channel, TX............ . 
13. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX....... 
13A. Anahuac Channel, TX............... 
13B. Channel to Liberty, TX ............... 
13C. Wallisville Lake, TX ............... 
14. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .. 
15. Navigation Work Under Special 
Authorization .................... 
Beach &rosion Control 
16. Corpus Christi Beach, TX ........... 
Flood Control 
17. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX..... 
17A. Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, TX. .... 
17B. Brays Bayou, TX .................. 
17C. Greens Bayou, TX ................ 
17D. Halls Bayou, TX .................. 
17E. Hunting Bayou, TX ................ 
17F. Little White Oak Bayou, TX. ......... 
17G. Carpenters Bayou, TX .............. 
18. Buffalo Bayou at Lynchburg, TX ...... 
19. Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point Village, TX. 
20. Clear Creek, TX .................. 
21. Cypress Creek, TX ................ 
22. Falfurrias, TX ................... 
23. Guadalupe River at Victoria, TX....... 
Page Flood Control (cont.) 
24. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX ......... 
31.2 24A. Arroyo Colorado, TX ............... 
31-2 24B. South Main Channel, TX ............ 
31-2 24C. Raymondville Drain, TX ............ 
31-3 25. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX 
31-3 Hurricane-Flood Protection........... 
314 26. Sims Bayou, TX.................. 
31-5 27. State Highway 111 Bridge, 
Lake Texana, TX ................. 
28. Taylors Bayou, TX ................ 
31-5 29. Inspection of Completed Flood Control 
31-7 W orks......................... 
31-7 30. Flood Control Work Under Special 
31-8 Authorization .................... 
31-8 31. Emergency Stream Bank and Shareline 
31-9 Erosion Work and Snagging and Clearing 
31-9 Under Special Authorization ......... 
31-9 
31-10 Environmental Restoration 
31-11 32. Project Modifications for Improvement of 
Environment ..................... 
31-11 33. Laguna Madre Seagrass Restoration, TX. 
34. Salt Bayou, McFadden Ranch, TX...... 
31-11 General Investigations 
35. Surveys........................ 
36. Planning and Engineering ........... 
31-11 37. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 
31-12 
31-12 
31-12 
31-12 
31-13 
31-13 
31-13 
31-13 
31-13 
31-14 
31-14 
31-14 
31-14 
Tables 
31-A Cost and Financial Statement . 31-20 thru31-24 
31-B Authorizing Legislation ...... 31-25 thru 31-39 
31-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects . . . 31-40 
31-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects. 31-40 
31-E Total Cost of Existing Projects 31-41 thru 31-42 
31-F Channel Dimensions ....... 31- 43 thru 31-45 
31-G Channel Dimensions, GIWW 
Tributary Channels ....... 31-46 thru 31-47 
31-H Dredging Operations ....... 31-48 thru 31-49 
31-1 
Page 
31-15 
31-15 
31-15 
31-15 
31-15 
31-16 
31-16 
31-16 
31-17 
31-17 
31-17 
31-17 
31-17 
31-18 
31-18 
31-18 
31-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Navigation 
1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL 
(SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 
ACT 
Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, 
connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas. 
Previous project. For details see page 699 of Annual 
Report for 1963. 
Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide 
for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, 
alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other 
obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, 
tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied 
waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, 
flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife 
conservation, public health, and related purposes, including 
continued research for development of the most effective 
and economic control measures. Control of hydrilla, waterhyacinth 
and alligatorweed continues in the Nueces River 
Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine 
River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, 
Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto 
River Basin, Rio Grande Basin, Colorado River Basin 
and Brazos River Basin. 
Local cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor 
Act, amended by Water Resources Development Act of 
1986, applies. 
Operations during fiscal year. Control work by the 
State of Texas continued. The final option year of the 
cost-sharing, cost-reimbursable contract with the State 
of Texas was invoked and a new contract was successfully 
negotiated for implementation in FY 1996. Fiscal Year 
1995 was the final year for the Hydrellia fly introduction, 
a hydrilla biocontrol-program which successfully 
established a nursery at Sheldon and Coleto Creek 
reservoirs and Lake Raven. An additional 18 lakes and 
3 bayous were determined eligible for treatment of hydrilla 
and Eurasion watermilfoil in FY 1995. Contract costs 
for this fiscal year were $106,873 with a work-in-kind 
credit of $205,379 to the State of Texas. 
2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX 
Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, 
about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 
miles east of Brownsville, Texas. (See National Ocean 
Survey Chart 11301.) 
Previous project For details see page 1017 of Annual 
Report for 1932. 
Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in 
various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 31- 
F. 
Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf 
entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 
5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing 
north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor 
constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, 
mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is 
about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some 
extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and 
during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface 
in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet 
or more above mean low tide in the gulf. Estimated cost 
for new work is: Federal (Corps) $27,731,647, exclusive 
of amount expended on previous projects, and non-Federal 
$12,383,258, including $7,193,258 contributed funds, 
$1,400,000 lands, $796,000 relocations, and $2,994,000 
other costs, exclusive of amount expended on previous 
projects. (October 1, 1994 base price). 
Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to 
Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner 
of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in 
April 1980. The 1,000-foot extension to existing north 
jetty was deauthorized under Section 1001 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986. The entrance channel 
was enlarged from 38 feet by 300 feet to 44 feet by 300 
feet in FY 1992. Work remaining consists of construction 
of an environmental mitigation site consisting of the 
creation of a 16 acre tidal wetland which is to be 
planted with shoal grass and black mangroves. This 
construction will complete the project as authorized by 
Water Resource Development Act of 1986. (See Table 
31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 
1994.) 
Local cooperation. Complied with for the completed 
work. For the 42 foot project authorized by the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are 
required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and 
material disposal areas; levees and spillways for disposal 
areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other 
facilities, except railroad bridges; pay one-half of the 
separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and pay 
25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, 
during construction, and pay an additional 10 percent of 
the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 
years following completion if not offset by credit allowed 
for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged 
material disposal areas. 
Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for 
bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 
26, revised 1991.) Facilities are adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The 
construction contract for dredging the final reach, Inshore 
Reach #3 Stations 46+000 to 89+500, awarded March 
11, 1994 was completed May 5, 1995 at a cost of 
$4,328,302 
Maintenance: The construction contract for erosion 
protection for Disposal Area No. 3, awarded August 2, 
1994, was completed at a cost of $12,330 for FY 1995. 
(See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 
3. CEDAR BAYOU, TX 
Location. The bayou is about 30 miles long. It 
flows to the south and empties into northwest corner of 
upper Galveston Bay, about 1.5 miles below mouth of 
San Jacinto River and about 28.5 miles north of Galveston, 
Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) 
Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 
1938. 
31-2

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
Existing project. Project provides for a channel 10 
feet by 100 feet from Houston Ship Channel to Bayou 
Mile 11.0. Channel was completed from Houston Ship 
Channel to first bend in Cedar Bayou above the mouth 
in 1931. Channel from Mile -04).1 to Mile 3.0 was 
completed in March 1975. Channel from Mile 3.0 to 
Mile 11.0 was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of Public Law 
93-251. Project also includes jetties at mouth of bayou 
provided for under previous project. 
Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 
0.6 feet and extreme range 1.2feet. Height of tides is 
dependent largely on the wind, and during strong 
"northers" in the winter season water surface may be 
depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. (See Table 31-E 
for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. U.S. Steel Company has a 
barge dock at bayou mile 2.8, and there are a few small 
wharves, privately owned, for local use at various places 
along Cedar Bayou. Facilities are considered adequate 
for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine 
maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 
4. CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX - 
Location. Port Bolivar is at end of Bolivar Peninsula 
and 4 miles north of city of Galveston. Channel connects 
the port with channel in Galveston Harbor. (See National 
Ocean Survey Chart 11324.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1856 of 
Appendix to Annual Report for 1915. 
Existing project. Existing project dimensions for 
channel are shown in Table 31-F. (Also see Table 31-B 
for authorizing legislation.) 
Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 
1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet Height of tides 
is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong 
"northers" in the winter season water surface may be 
depressed as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. 
Enlargement of turning basin from 1,000 to 1,600 feet is 
inactive. A channel 14 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 
approximately 950 feet long is maintained across the 
east end of the turning basin to accommodate the 
Galveston-Port Bolivar ferry. Project is complete except 
for inactive portion. Project dimensions have not been 
maintained in the completed part since lesser dimensions 
are adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 31-E for 
total cost of existing project to September 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperatio~. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Terminals are privately owned 
and consist of 2 slips and 2 piers. The piers, 400 feet 
wide by 1,200 feet long and 210 feet wide by 1,200 feet 
long, are badly deteriorated and not in use. The slips are 
used as anchorage by shallow-draft vessels. A highway 
ferry landing owned by the State of Texas is located at 
south end of turning basin. Facilities are considered 
adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. No maintenance 
required for fiscal year. 
5. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP 
CHANNEL, TX 
Location. This project, formerly known as the Port 
Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, Texas, was changed 
to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, by 1968 River 
and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements 
of Port Aransas, Texas, and channel from Aransas Pass 
to Corpus Christi, Texas. Aransas Pass is on southern 
portion of Texas Coast, 180 miles southwest of Galveston 
and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas 
Pass connects Corpus Christi Bay with the gulf. 
Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through 
Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 
miles to and including a turning basin at Corpus Christi, 
thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to 
and including turning basin at Avery Point, thence 
westerly 4.25 miles to and including a turning basin 
near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and 
including a turning basin at Viola, Texas. (See National 
Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1861 of Annual 
Report for 1915. 
Existing project. (See Table 31-F for existing project 
dimensions provided for in various channels and basins 
comprising this waterway.) 
Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at 
Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. 
Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which 
are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further 
provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 
20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and 
extending up this island to prevent a channel being cut 
around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at 
the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, and for 
the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project 
channel to Port Aransas. The breakwater consists of two 
overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the 
realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and 
the second, located on the west side of the entrance 
channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port 
Aransas was relocated in the 300-foot clear distance 
between the overlapping sections. The portion of the 
channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened 
to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range 
at Aransas Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range 
about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 
foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are 
dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, 
and during strong "northers" in the winter season water 
surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below mean 
low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) 
$74,938,515, including $456,515 for Port Aransas 
Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous 
projects: and non-Federal $18,977,431 (includes $768 for 
Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $7,644,435 
contributed funds and value of useful work performed, 
$3,320,228 lands, $6,027,000 relocations and $1,985,000 
other cost. (October 1, 1992 base price.) 
The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was 
completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was completed 
31-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed 
in July 1973. Deepening deep-draft channels to 45 feet 
from Tule Lake Turning Basin through Viola Turning 
Basin was completed in 1989, and constructing a mooring 
area at Port Ingleside with dolphins has been deferred. 
Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged to project 
depth and width, and dredging of channel from Harbor 
Island to and through the Chemical Turning Basin at 
45-foot depth has been completed. Initial mooring dolphins 
were completed in May 1979. Disposal area levees, Area 
1 and Rincon were completed in August 1984. First 
stage disposal area levees, South Shore, were completed 
in September 1984. (See Table 31-E for total cost of 
existing project to September 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperatiaon. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities on Harbor 
Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, 
La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, are considered adequate 
for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 
1983, Corps of Engineers.) 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The 
construction contract to repair the North and South 
jetties, awarded September 22, 1993 and physically 
completed June 17, 1994, was financially completed 
at a cost of $1,400 in FY 1995. (See Table 31-H for 
dredging operations.) 
6. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX 
Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River, 
Texas, from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, 
Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 
11322.) 
Previoi prlojeats. For details see page 1860 of Annual 
Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 
1938. 
Existig pieject. Existing project dimensions for 
various channels and basins are shown in Table 31-F on 
channel dimensions at end of chapter. 
Existing project also provides for: Dual jetties and a 
diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a 
lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also 
provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the 
relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the 
northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty 
Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of 
the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper 
Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and 
public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 
30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer 
Chemical Plant, including the turning basin, was 
deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Construction of 
lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered 
inactive. 
The 38-36 foot project was completed in 1962. New 
work consists of realigning, deepening and widening the 
Outer Bar and Jetty Channels; relocating the northeast 
jetty; rehabilitating the southwest jetty; realigning and 
deepening the harbor channel between the jetty channel 
and the Upper Turning Basin; relocating and enlarging 
the Upper Turning Basin; constructing a turning point 
near the northwesterly end of the jetty channel; enlarging 
Brazosport Turning Basin; deepening Brazos Harbor 
Channel; and enlarging and deepening Brazos Harbor 
Turning Basin, as authorized by the R&H Act of 1970. 
The initial contract for the 45 foot project, construction 
of 3,700 feet of the North Jetty, was awarded in May 
1987. Project is essentially complete. Quintana 
Recreation area is under construction by the Local Sponsor. 
Navigation problems have been identified by the Local 
Sponsor and pilots, and studies are underway by 
Waterways Experiment Station and the District. These 
studies will recommend a solution to provide full utilization 
of the 45-foot channel. (See Table 31-E for total cost of 
existing project to September 30, 1995.) 
Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 
1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except 
under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion 
channel do not cause greater variations in water surface 
than those caused by tidal action. Estimated cost of new 
work is: $62,397,000 Federal (Corps); and $33,536,000 
non-Federal, including $21,018,303 contributed funds, 
$360,249 contributed work, $7,440,000 lands, $3,830,000 
levees and spillways, and $570,000 relocations. (October 
1, 1994 base price.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for 
Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970, modified by 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local 
Cooperation Agreement, executed June 26, 1986, along 
with Amendments 1, 2 and 3, executed March 19, 1987, 
June 19, 1991 and June 19, 1991, respectively, require 
that local interest provide lands, easements, rights-ofway, 
including land for recreation, and dredged material 
disposal areas, presently estimated at $11,270,000, modify 
or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except 
railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the 
project, presently estimated at $570,000, contribute in 
cash one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to 
recreation, presently estimated at $530,000; and, during 
construction, pay 25 percent of the construction costs 
allocated to deep-draft navigation, presently estimated at 
$19,730,000. 
Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, 
two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks 
and one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District 
has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail 
facilities permitting all-weather work. Facilities considered 
adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, 
revised 1991, for additional facilities.) 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The 
contract to contruct 3,700 feet of North Jetty and remove 
the existing jetty, awarded May 22, 1987 and physically 
completed March 13, 1991, was financially completed in 
FY 1995 with a settlement of $245,525 for a claim for 
the suspension of work on August 12, 1988 due to the 
discovery of a shipwreck. Construction contract for 
dredging the Brazos Harbor and Turning Basin and 
enlarging the Upper Turning Basin, awarded August 30, 
1989, was financially completed January 13, 1995 in the 
amount of $37,150 for the settlement in regards to 
damages to the cathodic protection system at the Port of 
Freeport. 
31-4

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H 
for dredging operations.) 
7. GALVESTON HARBOR AND 
CHANNE 4 TX 
Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements 
at Galveston, Texas, which includes projects formerly 
identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, 
Texas; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to 
Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern 
portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends 
from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar 
Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf front 
Galveston, Texas, and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 
feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual 
Report for 1915. 
Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in 
sections of the waterway shown in Table 31-F. 
Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south 
one extending from Galveston Island and the north one 
extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 
feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, into the Gulf of Mexico; 
a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and 
Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, 
and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a 
southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins 
along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; 
and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th 
Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary 
conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 
feet an outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme 
ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean range in 
Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range 
about 2 feet under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in 
both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely 
on the wind, and during strong "northers" water surface 
may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. 
Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston 
channel to 36 foot depth was completed in November 
1966. Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar 
Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation 
of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1970. 
Dredging of Galveston channel to 40 feet was completed 
in March 1976. See Section 12. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, 
TX regarding work authorized by Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986. (See Table 31-E for total cost 
of existing project to September 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation. Complied with, 
Terminal facilities. None on Galveston Harbor, which 
is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on 
Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels. 
Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south 
side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of 
Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port 
Series No. 23, revised 1979). A containership terminal 
equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers 
three units high on the deck of any normal containership 
has been completed and placed into operation by the city 
of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of 
Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed 
into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35-ton 
and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges 
on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and 
holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican 
Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. 
Present facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance 
included a landscaping contract for the Fort Point 
reservation, awarded in FY 1993, was completed in FY 
1995 at a cost of $44,093. (See Table 31-H for dredging 
operations.) 
8. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY 
BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, 
AND MEXICAN BORDER 
Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River 
about 3 miles below Orange, Texas, to Brownsville, 
Texas, about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 
miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, 
Texas, to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary channel in San 
Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway 
crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above 
crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending 
from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5 miles; a 
tributary channel extending about 14 miles from 
Intracoastal Waterway to Palacios, Texas; a tributary 
channel extending about 2 miles from Intracoastal 
Waterway to Rockport, Texas; a tributary channel 
extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway 
near Port Aransas, Texas, to town of Aransas Pass, 
Texas; a tributary channel about one-fourth mile long 
extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, 
Texas, into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending 
about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift 
to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, 
Texas; a harbor of refuge for small craft at Seadrift; a 
channel extending from gulf to Port Mansfield, Texas, 
about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo, 
Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a 
point near Harlingen, Texas, about 31 miles; side channels 
in vicinity of Port Isabel, Texas, and a small boat basin 
at Port Isabel, Texas, and a tributary channel extending 
from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in 
West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles 
with a west turnout (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 
125 feet wide between Offatts Bayou Channel and the 
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey 
Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 
11315, 11317, 11319, 11322, 11326, and 11331.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual 
Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River 
Canal, Texas.) 
Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided 
for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep 
31-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
(below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine 
River to Brownsville, Texas. Relocation of channel 12 
feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 
to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet 
wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage 
is west of Harvey Lock, Louisiana); and alternate channel, 
12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via 
Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston 
causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep 
by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between 
Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing 
places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, railway 
bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the 
tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized 
channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine 
River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. (See Table 
31-G on existing project dimensions provided for in 
tributary channels.) 
Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at 
Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the 
facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening 
the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel 
to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972, Offatts 
Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation 
of main channel across Corpus Christi Bay was completed 
in September 1976. The 14 foot by 175 foot Channel to 
Aransas Pass was completed in April 1979. Dredging 
Chocolate Bayou Channel was completed in January 
1981. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate 
Bayou was completed in February 1981. The 12 foot by 
125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has 
been deauthorized. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, 
Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. 
Construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River was 
completed in 1986. Construction of a navigation channel 
from the Gulf to the GIWW and an impoundment basin 
were fiscally completed in Fiscal Year 1991. Construction 
of Tiger Island Dam and recreation facilities were also 
completed in Fiscal Year 1991. Construction of, the 
recreation facilities is complete. Construction of the 
diversion dam and connecting channel was completed in 
FY 1993. Active authorized work remaining consists of 
the following: (1) Mouth of Colorado River, construction 
of an oyster cultch; (2) Work authorized by the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1988 for enlarging the 
existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and 
width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 
feet. (3) Sargent Beach, work authorized by the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 for construction of a 
cormrete-pile and concrete-block revetment structure which 
extends for an estimated 8 miles to protect the Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway. (4) Brazos River Floodgates, 
major rehabilitation of the East Floodgate Guidewalls. 
(See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to 
September 30, 1995.) 
Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at 
Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at 
Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio 
Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 
1.5 feet at Brownsville. Extreme ranges of tide under 
ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port 
Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 
feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at 
Corpus Christi, 2 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at 
Brownsville. Height of tides is dependent largely on 
wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface 
as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost 
for new work is: $139,833,000 (excluding $229,000 
Department of Transportation cost for Channel to Victoria) 
Federal (Corps), including $8,414 for Port Isabel Side 
Channel, $46,559 for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin, 
$356,466 for Offatts Bayou, and $658,573 for Channel to 
Aransas Pass and excluding expenditures on previous 
projects; non-Federal $25,568,174 ($395,000 voluntarily 
expended on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 
contributed funds for Port Isabel, $49,665 contributed 
funds for Offatts Bayou, $347,950 contributed funds for 
channel to Aransas Pass, $3,533,000 contributed funds 
for Mouth of Colorado River, $2,687,000 contributed funds 
for Channel to Victoria, $6,022,000 lands for Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway, $11,000 lands for Port Isabel, 
$4,291,000 relocations for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, 
and $5,556,000 other costs for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway; 
and Inland Waterways Trust Fund $35,667,000 
($32,836,000 for Sargent Beach and $2,831,000 for major 
rehabilitation of guidewalls for Brazos River Floodgates). 
(October 1, 1995 base prices.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for 
provisions of Section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act 
and Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Non- 
Federal contributions are $395,000 for Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway, $46,559 for Port Isabel, Texas, $49,665 for 
Offatts Bayou, Texas, $347,950 for Channel to Aransas 
Pass, Texas, and $3,533,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, 
Texas, and $2,707,000 for Channel to Victoria. The 
Project Cooperation Agreement for Channel to Victoria 
was executed November 17, 1994. 
Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities, at 
Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and 
Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1988), Port 
Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Port Series No. 25 (revised 
1983) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1991), Corps of 
Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities 
at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous 
privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. 
A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, 
a 770-foot private dock and a 760-foot private timber 
trestle have recently been completed at the upper end of 
the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work:- 
Mouth of Colarado River - The construction 
contract to construct the oyster cultch, awarded August 
10, 1994, was completed March 26, 1995 at a cost of 
$3068,980. 
Channel to Victaria - Engineering and design 
for disposal areas and channel construction on the land 
locked portion of the channel continued and real estate 
interests from the local sponsor are being coordinated. 
Sargent Beach - The contract to construct a 
concrete and rock barrier along an eight mile reach of 
the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Sargent, Texas was 
awarded April 21, 1995 and continued through FY 1995 
at a cost of $1,603,924. 
31-6

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
Brazos River Floodgates - The major rehabilitation 
contract to replace the guidewalls at the east gate was 
awarded August 10, 1994 and continued through FY 
1995 at a cost of $1,576,047 of which $1,260,244 were 
Corps of Engineers funds and $315,803 were Inland 
Waterways Trust funds. 
Maint nan e: - 
Channel to Harlinge~ - See Table 31-H for 
dredging operations. 
Main Channel and Tributaries - Contract to 
dewater Disposal Areas 35, 36, 42, 64, 65, 70, 71, and 
72, awarded July 29, 1994 was completed in January 
1995 at a fiscal year cost of $173,092. Construction 
contract for barge mooring facilities at Chocolate Bayou 
was awarded in October 1994 and completed in 1995 
for $633,500. A contract to construct barge mooring 
facilities at Port O'Connor and Matagorda Bay was 
awarded January 13, 1995 and continued through FY 
1995 at a cost of $1,713,670. A contract for construction 
of a barge mooring facilities at Port Arthur, awarded 
January 18, 1995 was completed this fiscal year at a 
cost of $599,900. A contract for barge mooring facilities 
at Channel to Victaria and Ingleside was awarded February 
24, 1995 and continued through FY 1995 at a cost of 
$1,073,500. The barge mooring facility contract at 
Atkinson Island, Pelican Island, and Bolivar Peninsula 
was financially completed this fiscal year at a cost of 
$1,693. 
Aransas National Wildlife Refuge - Contract 
awarded August 7, 1995, for erosion protection at Welder 
Flats along the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge in 
Aransas and Nueces County at Station 829+213 to Station 
811+460 was completed in October 1995 for a cost of 
$265,176. 
Brazos River Floodgates - The Brazos River 
Floodgates were operated and maintained at a cost of 
$1,666,121 including engineering and design, supervision 
and administration, and real estate activities. The 
construction contract for a new fence, erosion protection, 
boat dock, and repair access road at the west gate, 
awarded June 23,1994, was completed in FY 1995 at a 
cost of $495,370. 
Colorado River Locks - The Colorado River Locks 
were operated and maintained at a cost of $1,818,936. 
The contract to replace the guidewalls at the east lock - 
west gate awarded November 5, 1993, was completed in FY 
1995 at a fiscal year cost of $284,817. A contract for 
emergency repairs of the sector gate was awarded November 
9, 1994 and was completed December 9, 1994 for a cost of 
$164,771. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 
9. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX 
Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point 
opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, 
extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay 
through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a 
turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft 
channel 5 miles long from turning basin to Jensen 
Drive, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 
113245, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) 
Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual 
Report for 1915. 
Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in 
sections of the waterway shown in Table 31-F. 
Also provides for certain cut-offs, for easing sharp 
bends, an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey 
Bend, and for off-channel silting basins as deemed 
necessary by the Chief of Engineers. Construction of 
26,000 linear feet of pile dike to protect the channel in 
upper Galveston Bay was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 
93-251. The 40-foot project was completed in March 
1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou to Mile 1.57 
was completed in 1970. Dredging Greens Bayou, Mile 
1.57 to Mile 2.73, has been deauthorized. (See Table 31- 
E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 
1994.) 
Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 
foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 
1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San Jacinto 
River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary 
conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet and 1 foot, respectively. 
Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; 
however, this condition has not occurred since completion 
of Addicks and Barker Dams for flood control on upper 
watershed of Buffalo Bayou. Height of tides is dependent 
largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in 
winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet 
below mean low tide. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Houston 
Ship Channel. Local Cooperation Agreement for 
assumption of maintenance on Bayport Ship Channel 
was executed April 6, 1993. Local Cooperation Agreements 
were being developed for assumption of maintenance on 
Barbour Terminal Channel and Greens Bayou Channel. 
Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of 
Houston Authority operate modern terminals which 
supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, 
as described in Port Series No. 24 (revised 1989), Corps 
of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The 
contract to construct barge mooring facilities at Atkinson 
Island, Pelican Island and Bolivar Basin, awarded in 
April 1994 and physically completed in June 1994, was 
financially completed in FY 1995 at a fiscal year cost of 
$877. Routine maintenance included mosquito control 
spraying at a cost of $177,305. (See Table 31-H for 
dredging operations.) See Section 36, Planning and 
Engineering. 
10. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX 
Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft 
channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cavallo to 
Port Lavaca, Texas," and deep draft channel improvements 
authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas." Bar 
at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston 
entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects 
Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across 
Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca 
and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite 
31-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest 
from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 
11316.) 
Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided 
for in various channels and basins are listed in Table 
31-F on channel dimensions. 
Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, 
south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the 
gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24-foot 
depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 
about 1 foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of 
tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong 
"northers" in winter season the water surface may be 
depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. The costs for new 
work was $18,058,777 Federal (Corps), and $12,859,000 
non-Federal, including $12,259,619 contributed funds, 
$182,000 for lands, $220,000 for relocations, and $196,581 
other costs. The project was completed in March 1967. 
(See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to 
September 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port 
Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn 
bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at 
Point Comfort, Texas. These facilities are considered 
adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort 
consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock 
and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Company 
of America; and a wharf built by local interest at Point 
Comfort turning basin. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine 
maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 
11. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX 
Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements 
of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and 
"Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange 
and Neches River to Beaumont, Texas." Sabine Pass is 
on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 
280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It 
connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends 
7 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port 
Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper 
end, Sabine-Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of 
Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up 
Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to 
Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341, 11342, 
and 11343.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual 
Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, 
and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. 
Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided 
for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 
31-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for 
two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, 
western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 
25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of 
guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal, construction of suitable 
permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage 
owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material 
from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of 
material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, 
and relocation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal 
variation at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur 
about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 
foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have 
depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean 
low tide while tropical disturbances have caused heights 
as much as 8 feet above mean low tide. 
Existing project is complete. Removal of obstructive 
bridge at Port Arthur was completed May 1969. The 
high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was 
completed October 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet 
was completed April 1972. (See Table 31-E for total cost 
of existing project to September 30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation. Complied with. 
Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 
(revised 1988), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered 
adequate for present commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance 
included mosquito control spraying at a cost of $28,468. 
An equitable adjustment in the amount of $48,610 was 
paid in FY 1995 for the contract awarded in FY 1994 
for dredging the Port Arthur Turing Basin and Junction 
Area. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 
12. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX 
Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on 
west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of 
city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 
11324/5.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual 
Report for 1915. 
Existing project. Provides for channel 40 feet deep, 
400 feet wide and about 6.75 miles long, from Bolivar 
Roads to a turning basin at Texas City, 40 feet deep, 
1,000 feet to 1,200 feet wide and 4,253 feet long; and an 
Industrial Canal, 40 feet deep and 300-400 feet wide 
extending a distance of 1.7 miles southwestward from 
the south end of Texas City Turning Basin, and a 
turning basin, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,150 
feet long. 
Project also provides for easing the approach to the 
turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to 
and north of the channel; and a rubble-mound dike, 
27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. 
The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. 
Widening the Texas City Turning Basin; realigning the 
Texas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly 
from its present position; and enlargement through 
widening and deepening of the Industrial Canal and 
basins was initiated in July 1980 and completed in June 
1982. The only work remaining is deferred construction 
consisting of widening the Industrial Canal from 250 
feet to 300 feet at 40 foot depth. 
Work authorized by Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 would modify the project by providing for 
deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, 
31-8

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
enlarging the 6.7-mile long Texas City Channel to 50 
feet by 600 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide 
Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 
feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and 
Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52-foot depth for 4.1 
miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a 
width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of 
Mexico. Establishment of 600 acres of wetland and 
development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 
90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike are also 
proposed. At the request of local sponsor, City of Texas 
City, the project has been placed in the "deferred" 
category. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project 
to September 30, 1995.) 
Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 
1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide 
is dependent largely on the wind and during strong 
"northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below 
mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is 
$123,300,000 Federal (Corps), excluding expenditures on 
previous projects, and $74,393,700 non-Federal, including 
$62,027,741 contributed funds, $248,000 work contribution, 
$427,959 lands, $10,737,000 levees and spillways, $6,000 
for removal of barge mooring facilities from Shoal Point 
(formerly known as Snake Island), $561,000 for berthing 
areas, and $386,000 relocations. (October 1, 1988 base 
price.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed 
work. For work authorized by the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to 
provide levees for disposal areas and wetlands; relocate 
utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; 
provide berthing areas; pay one-half of the separable and 
joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of 
operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation 
facilities, and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the 
costs allocated to deep-draft navigation to a depth of 45 
feet plus 50 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft 
navigation deeper than 45 feet; pay an additional 10 
percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation 
within a period of 30 years following completion if not 
offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-ofway, 
relocations and disposal areas; and pay 50 percent 
of the costs incurred for operation and maintenance 
below the 45-foot depth. 
Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities 
are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and 
are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deepdraft 
channel and turning basin extend about 1.9 miles 
southwestward from south end of Texas City Turning 
Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port 
Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Corps of Engineers. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contract 
to dewater Snake Island, awarded July 29, 1994, was 
completed November 18, 1994 and an adjustment of cost 
was incurred for a credit of $398. The erosion protection 
contract for Snake Island, awarded August 24, 1994, 
was completed in FY 1995 at a fiscal year cost of 
$853,910. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 
13. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, 
TX 
Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is 
formed at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and 
the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5. The mouth of the 
Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. 
(See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) 
Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and 
dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 
1933. 
Existing project. See individual detailed reports on 
Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville 
Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project 
designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which 
was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to 
local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See 
Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 
30, 1995.) 
Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on 
Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. There is no 
local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. 
Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and 
piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, 
Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. 
13A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TX 
Location: Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston 
Bay to Anahuac, Texas, opposite mouth of Trinity River 
38 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean 
Survey Chart 11323.) 
Existing project. No project dimensions authorized 
by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6- by 80-foot channel, 
16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 
100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions 
tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent 
largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 
1.5 feet below mean sea level. Latest published map is in 
House Document 440, 56th Congress, 1st Session. Project 
was completed in 1911. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and 
piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: No work 
was incurred during the fiscal year. 
13B. CHANNEL IX) LBERTY, TX 
Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay 
and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological 
Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, 
Texas.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual 
Report for 1932. 
Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from 
Anahuac to Liberty which was completed in 1925. A 
navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near 
Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Texas, with 
depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along 
the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity 
River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a 
31-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
turning basin at Liberty, Texas, and a protective 
embankment along the west side of the channel in 
Trinity Bay. 
The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 
1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged 
from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one 
mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of 
dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below 
Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. 
local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of 
"Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and 
1 mile below Anahuac, Texas, as required by 1946 River 
and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess.), 
but not complied with for remaining portion of "Channel 
to Liberty" as required by River and Harbor Act of 1945 
(H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.) at an estimated 
total cost of $550,000, of which $460,000 is for lands and 
rights-of-way and $90,000 for pipeline relocations for 9- 
by 150-foot channel. 
Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and 
docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.'s 
slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine 
maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 
13C. WALLISVIL. E LAKE, TX 
Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles 
northwest of Anahuac, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey 
Chart 11323.) 
Existing project. Provides for construction of a dam 
and overflow spillway approximately 8 miles long to 
prevent salinity intrusion and create a 3,800 acre 
reservoir. The maximum pool elevation will be 2 feet 
above National Geodetic Vertical Datum. (The reservoir 
was reduced from 5600 acres with a maximum pool 
elevation of 4 feet N.G.V.D. by agreement to protect the 
endangered bald eagle.) Project provides for an 84 foot by 
600-foot navigation lock to facilitate navigation on Channel 
to Liberty. The sill has a depth of minus 16 feet below 
National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project also provides 
for two recreational areas. Dam controls a drainage area 
of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non-Federal 
project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity 
of 14,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal 
range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is 
dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds 
depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. 
Total estimated cost of authorized project is $68,421,000 
Federal (Corps). (October 1, 1995 base price.) 
A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog 
intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was 
completed in October 1968. Work started in July 1970 on 
construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, 
and navigation channel. Work was suspended in February 
1973 because of an injunction halting construction. 
Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and 
was completed in April 1973. An exception to the 
injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was 
completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court 
of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed in April 1973. 
In August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the 
judgment and remanded the case with directions that a 
revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged 
anew. Final supplement to the Environmental Impact 
Statement for the modified project authorized in the 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1983 (PL 98-63) was 
submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on 
September 21, 1983. 
In March 1986, the Court rendered its Memorandum 
of order continuing the injunction and directing the 
Corps to recommence the administrative process at the 
time when the first departure from standard NEPA 
procedures occurred prior to the 1983 legislative action. 
The Corps and local sponsors perfected an appeal to the 
U.S. Court of Appeals and on May 11, 1987, the Court of 
Appeals ruled in favor of the Corps and dismissed the 
suit in its entirety. 
The Energy and Water Development Appropriation 
Act of 1991 provided $9,200,000 for the project and 
directive language for continuation of construction. 
In the fall of 1989, a pair of bald eagles were 
discovered nesting at the project site which led to 
additional consultation under the Endangered Species 
Act. Solicitation of the contract for the non-overflow dam 
was postponed to allow for environmental coordination. 
An Environmental Assessment was prepared with a 
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) which was 
signed in September 1991. Environmental documents 
were approved and construction was resumed. 
Work remaining consist of design and construction 
of lock rehabilitation; gated navigation channel; controlled 
spillway and bridge; and two water control structures. 
Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute 
an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, onehalf 
of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated 
to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 
percent of total project cost. Local interest reimbursement 
is estimated at $10,263,000. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Contract 
for construction of non-overflow dam, awarded September 
20, 1991 and physically completed September 28, 1993, 
incurred a cost of $32,806 for a variation in quantities 
price adjustment on the borrow excavation. The 
construction contract to repair the lock access road, 
awarded March 8, 1994 and physically completed July 
19, 1994, was financially completed in February 195 
with a fiscal year cost of $8,169. An architecture/ 
engineering contract was awarded April 4, 1994 to prepare 
plans, specifications and cost estimates for: rehabilitation 
and completion of the navigation lock; completion of the 
North and South navigation channels; design of a new 
administratior/resident office building; and electrical and 
mechanical design of equipment controls for the controlled 
spillway structure. 1995 This contract was completed in FY at a costs of $781,560. 
Maintenance: Ranger surveillance, administration of 
project, and administration of duck blind permit program 
was conducted. Routine maintenance included mosquito 
control spaying at a cost of $5,893. 
31-10

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
14. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION 
SURVEYS 
Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys were conducted 
periodically on the following projects: 
Project 
Fiscal 
Year 
Cost 
Cedar Bayou $2,248 
Channel to Harlingen 18,448 
Clear Creek 1,269 
Galveston Harbor 1,361 
Sabine-Neches Waterway 5,473 
Dickinson Bayou 44 
Channel to Port Mansfield 20,088 
Double Bayou 100 
Texas City Channel 554 
$49,585- 
15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public 
Law 86-645 (preauthorization). 
An initial appraisal study for Cedar Bayou was 
initiated and later terminated as it was determined that 
is would be more appropriate to pursue navigation 
improvement through the regular Congressional 
authorization route. Fiscal Year 1995 costs were $7,000. 
Mitigation of shore damages attributable to navigation 
projects pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483. 
An initial appraisal study for mitigation of shore 
damages at Port Aransas was completed this fiscal year 
at a costs of $10,000. The study was terminated due to 
lack of economic justification. 
Beach Erosion Control 
16. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX 
(RESTORATION PROJECT) 
Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having 
a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of 
Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, 
Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 
11311.) 
Existing project. The plan of improvement provided 
for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi 
Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the 
easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic 
nourishment as required. Construction was completed in 
March 1978. Periodic nourishment and construction of 
sand retention groin was completed in November 1985. 
Estimated cost of new work is $2,150,000 Federal (Corps) 
and $2,265,000 non-Federal consisting of $2,150,000 
Contributed funds, $43,000 relocations, and $72,000 lands. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. Section 934 of Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 provides for extension 
of nourishment period to 50 years for beach nourishment 
projects. A study to determine the appropriateness of 
such an extended nourishment period for the Federal 
beach nourishment project was completed. The study 
indicated that there was no economic justification for 
continued Federal participation in the program. The 
responsibility for beach monitoring and maintenance was 
transferred to the City of Corpus Christi in July 1990. 
Flood Control 
17. BUFFALO BAYOU AND 
TRIBUTARIES, TX 
Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou 
watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in 
Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, 
Texas. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris 
County.) 
Existing project. Provides for improvements of Buffalo 
Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin of Houston 
Ship Channel to control floods for protection of city of 
Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin 
of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, 
enlargement and rectification of channels and construction 
of control works. Cost of new work is $127,000,000 
Federal (Corps) and $86,891,000 non-Federal for lands 
and relocations. (October 1, 1986 base price.) 
Channel rectification on Brays Bayou with an 
improved channel length 25.4 miles was completed in 
March 1971. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou 
was completed in 1976. Work remaining consists of 
rectification of approximately 22 miles of main stem of 
Buffalo Bayou. 
See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker 
Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little 
White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. 
Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control 
Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required 
local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. 
On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests 
that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel 
below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the 
remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local 
interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 
percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of 
the required bridge relocations have been accomplished. 
Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control 
District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 
86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, 
Houston and Henderson Railroad Company for bridge 
alterations at Brays Bayou. Non-Federal contributions 
totaled $63,661 for project betterment. Recreation 
development is subject to conditions of non-Federal costsharing 
under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 
1965. 
See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker 
Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little 
White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. 
31-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
17A. ADDICKS AND BARKER 
RESERVOIRS, TX 
Location. Reservoirs are located in and west of the 
City of Houston in Harris, Waller, and Fort Bend Counties, 
Texas. 
Existing project. Construction of Barker Dam was 
complete in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam 
and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from 
Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 
1948. Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams consisting 
of gating of two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was 
complete in 1969. Major rehabilitation of Addicks and 
Barker Dams to prevent seepage through the embankment 
was completed in 1982. Estimated cost of new work is 
$11,900,000 for recreational facilities at completed projects 
(Code 713 funds). Non-Federal funds consist of $11,900,000 
contributions for recreational facilities. (October 1991 
base price.) 
Work under the Dam Safety Assurance program was 
initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Work accomplished included 
raising approximately 32,400 feet of Addicks Dam 1 to 3 
feet and raising approximately 57,600 feet of Barker Dam 
3 to 5 feet and armor-plating low ends of both dams. A 
contract with the city of Houston for cost-sharing in the 
construction of recreation facilities was entered into in 
November 1981. The lease for approximately 10,534 acres 
of land and water areas was approved in February 1983. 
local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Recreation: Community 
Park West (Phase IB) and the velodrome were completed 
in November 1986. Grading and clearing for an archery 
range was performed by the City of Houston in March 
and April 1987. Work on Community Park West (Phase 
4) by the City of Houston was completed in 1992, as was 
the development of Community Park 2 (soccer fields, 
ball fields, and parking lots) by Harris County Precinct 
3 in Cullen-Barker Park. Maintenance and improvements 
of these recreation areas continues. 
Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance 
at Addicks and Barker Dams. Construction under a 
contract for new roads on the dams began in 1995 and 
is expected to finish by 1997. Development of plans and 
specifications for rehab of Barker Ditch and for rehab of 
flood control structures at both dams began in 1995. A 
contract for pest control was issued at a cost of $104,203. 
17B. BRAYS BAYOU, TX 
Location. The project is located in the south-central 
portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. 
Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement 
consists of 3 miles of stream improvements, 3 flood 
detention basins, and 7 miles of stream diversion 
channels. Aesthetic vegetation is included. Recreation 
facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, 
comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost 
for new work is $207,244,000 Federal (Corps) and 
$122,560,000 non-Federal consisting of $18,608,000 cash 
contributions, and $103,952,000 for lands and relocations 
(October 1995 base price). 
Location cooperation. Local sponsor for the project 
is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is 
required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; 
modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads 
and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a 
cash contribution presently estimated at $18,608,000 
and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and 
replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project 
was authorized for construction in the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). See Section 36, 
Planning and Engineering. 
170. GREENS BAYOU, TX 
Location. The project is located in the north-central 
portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX, and does 
not include the Halls Bayou tributary. 
Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement 
consists of 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of 
stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic 
vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities 
include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, 
ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated 
cost for new work is $137,853,000 Federal (Corps) and 
$89,749,000 non-Federal consisting of $13,373,000 cash 
contributions, and $75,376,000 for lands and relocations 
(October 1995 base price). 
Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is 
Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is 
required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; 
modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads 
and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a 
cash contribution presently estimated at $13,373,000 
and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and 
replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project 
was authorized for construction in the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). See Section 36, 
Planning and Engineering. 
17D. HALLS BAYOU, TX 
Location. Halls Bayou is a major tributary of Greens 
Bayou, located in the north-central portion of Buffalo 
Bayou, Harris County, TX. 
Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement 
consists of 18 miles of stream improvements. Recreation 
facilities include trails, picnic facilities, boat ramps, a 
comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost 
for new work is $60,565,000 Federal (Corps) and 
$47,333,000 non-Federal consisting of $6,840,000 cash 
contributions, and $40,493,000 for lands and relocations 
(October 1995 base price). 
Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is 
Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is 
required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; 
modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads 
and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a 
cash contribution presently estimated at $6,840,000 and 
bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement 
of flood control and recreation facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project 
was authorized for construction in the Water Resources 
31-12

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting 
Planning and Engineering funds. 
17E. HUNTING BAYOU, TX 
Location. Hunting Bayou is located in Houston, 
approximately 4 to 5 miles from the central business 
district. 
Existing project The authorized plan of improvement 
consists of 14.3 miles of stream improvements. Recreation 
facilities include trails, picnic facilities, a comfort station 
and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is 
$59,873,000 Federal (Corps) and $55,946,000 non-Federal 
consisting of $6,183,000 cash contributions, and 
$49,763,000 for lands and relocations (October 1995 base 
price). 
Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is 
Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is 
required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; 
modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads 
and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a 
cash contribution presently estimated at $6,183,000 and 
bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement 
of flood control and recreation facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project 
was authorized for construction in the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting 
Planning and Engineering funds. 
17F. ITTLE WHITE OAK BAYOU, TX 
Location. Little White Oak Bayou is a tributary of 
White Oak Bayou in north-central Houston. 
Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement 
consists of 6.0 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation 
facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated 
cost for new work is $17,958,000 Federal (Corps) and 
$17,957,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,996,000 cash 
contributions, and $15,961,000 for lands and relocations 
(October 1990 base price). 
Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is 
Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is 
required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; 
modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads 
and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a 
cash contribution presently estimated at $1,996,000 and 
bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement 
of flood control and recreation facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project 
was authorized for construction in the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting 
Planning and Engineering funds. 
17G. CARPENTERS BAYOU, TX 
Location. Carpenters Bayou is a tributary of Buffalo 
Bayou in northeastern Houston. 
Existing project The authorized plan of improvement 
consists of 9.7 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation 
facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated 
cost for new work is $3,900,000 Federal (Corps) and 
$1,950,000 non-Federal consisting of $370,000 cash 
contributions, and $2,320,000 for lands and relocations 
(October 1990 base price). 
Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is 
Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is 
required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; 
modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads 
and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a 
cash contribution presently estimated at $370,000 and 
bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement 
of flood control and recreation facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project 
was authorized for construction in the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting 
Planning and Engineering funds. 
18. BUFFALO BAYOU, TX (LYNCHBURG 
PUMP STATION) 
Location. The project is located 10 miles east of 
Houston, Texas near the entrance to the Houston Ship 
Channel. 
Existing project. The Lynchburg Pump Station is 
to be protected by a flod barrier encircling the facility. 
A plan consisting of a combination sheet pile wall and 
earth levee is recommended. Total barrier length is 
approximately 2000 feet. The Crosby-Lynchburg Road 
will be rerouted to the top of the levee. 
Local cooperation. The Coastal Water Authority, 
owned by the City of Houston, is the local sponsor of 
the project. 
Operation during the fiscal year. The Detailed 
Project Study was underway throughout FY 1995 and 
was nearing completion at the end of that period. An 
implementation plan in the amount of $5,985,000 has 
been tentatively agreed upon by the local sponsor, 
subject to approval by higher authority of the Corps of 
Engineers. Construction could be initiated in late FY 
1996 if funds are available. 
19. BUFFALO BAYOU AT 
PINEY POINT VILLAGE, TX 
Location. The project is located on Buffalo Bayou, 
within the city limits of Piney Point Village, an 
independent, incorporated community located 10 miles 
west of downtown Houston and entirely surrounded by 
the City of Houston. 
Existing project. The approved plan provides for 
erosion protection on 260 feet of the east bank of Buffalo 
Bayou adjacent to Farnham Park Drive. The protection 
consists of lightweight aggregate and granular fill covered 
by gabions, with riprap toe protection. The fill and 
gabions will be placed on a 2 horizontal on 1 vertical 
slope and will be filled with 4- to 8-inch stone. Estimated 
cost for the new work is $318,000 Federal (Corps) and 
$140,000 non-Federal, consisting of $107,000 cash and 
$33,000 for lands, easements and rights-of-way. 
Local cooperation. The City of Piney Point Village is 
the local sponsor for the project. A Project Cooperation 
31-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Agreement was executed August 15, 1994. 
Operations during fiscal year. The detailed project 
report was completed on October 1, 1992. Work on the 
plans and specifications began on April 1, 1993 and was 
completed in FY 1994. A construction contract for 
erosion protection was awarded September 29, 1994 and 
completed September 29, 1995 at a fiscal year cost of 
$409,819. 
20. CLEAR CREEK, TX 
Location. The project is located about midway between 
the two metropolitan centers of Houston, Texas, on the 
north and Galveston-Texas City on the south in Harris 
and Galveston Counties above and below existing Clear 
Lake. 
Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement 
consists of an improved channel from Mile 3.8 to Mile 
34.8 to contain within its banks all flood flows up to and 
including that of a 100-year flood. The selected plan 
provides channel enlargement and easing of bends within 
the existing stream from Mile 3.8 to Mile 26.05 to 
contain at least the 10-year frequency storm, and 
additional outlet with gated structure from Clear Lake to 
Galveston Bay, restriction of development in the residual 
100-year flood plain and measures to mitigate 
environmental effects. In 1986, at the request of Brazoria 
County Drainage District No. 4, that portion of the 
project upstream of the Brazoria/Galveston County line, 
approximate improved Mile 19.1, was placed in the 
"inactive" category. Estimated cost for new work, excluding 
"inactive" portion, is $66,009,000 Federal (Corps) and 
$52,255,000 non-Federal consisting of $5,917,000 cash 
contributions, $22,600,000 for lands, and $23,741,000 for 
relocations (October 1, 1995 base price). 
Local cooperation. Local sponsors for the project are 
Galveston and Harris counties. The Local Cooperation 
Agreement, executed June 30, 1986, requires local interests 
to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material 
disposal areas; modify or relocate building, pipelines, 
utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges, 
where necessary in the construction of the project; make 
a cash contribution for mitigation measures consistent 
with the non-Federal share of total project costs without 
mitigation measures; pay five percent of the total costs 
allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation 
and maintenance of flood control facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and 
Design is underway. 
21. CYPRESS CREEK, TX 
Location. The project is located north of Houston, 
Texas in Harris County. 
Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement 
consists of enlargement of. the lower 29.4 miles of the 
Cypress Creek Channel, incorporating grassed side slopes 
and channel bottom and appropriate erosion control 
measures; application of floodplain management techniques 
in the residual floodplain; construction of project-oriented 
recreation features, including 11.5 miles of hike-and-bike 
trails and related facilities for health, safety, and public 
access; and habitat management measures on 844 acres 
of Harris County Parkway land, creation of wooded and 
brush habitat along 100 acres of the project right-ofway, 
acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat along the 
creek, and creation of 35 acres of ponds and marshes. 
Estimated cost for new work is $104,874,000 Federal 
(Corps) and $41,616,000 non-Federal consisting of 
$18,434,000 cash contribution, $16,182,000 for lands, 
and $7,000,000 for relocations (October 1, 1995 base 
price). 
Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is 
Harris County. Local sponsor is required to provide 
lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate 
buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, 
except railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution 
presently estimated at $13,668,000; and bear all costs of 
operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control 
and recreation facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. See Section 36, 
Planning and Engineering. 
2. FRAS TX 
Location. The city of Falfurrias is located near the 
confluence of Palo Blanco and Cibolo Creeks, intermittent 
streams that drain a 600-square-mile area in south 
Texas. 
Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement 
consists of a 5.6 mile long diversion levee; a 1.8 mile 
long pilot channel; a flowage easement of 11,000 acres of 
land subject to overflows from the pilot channel; and a 
0.8 mile long ring levee around the sewage treatment 
plant. Estimated cost for new work is $16,870,000 Federal 
(Corps) and $16,870,000 non-Federal consisting of 
$1,687,000 cash contribution, $13,013,000 for lands, and 
$2,170,000 for relocations (October 1, 1991 base price). 
Project was placed in the "deferred" category pending 
Local Sponsor's ability to provide their share of costs. - 
Local cooperation. The local sponsor would be required 
to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or 
relocate buildings, pipeline, utilities, roads and other 
facilities, except railroad bridges; provide a cash 
contribution presently estimated at $1,687,000 and bear 
all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of 
flood control facilities. Project was placed in the "deferred" 
category pending Local Sponsor's ability to provide their 
share of costs. 
Operations during fiscal year. No work was incurred 
in FY 1995. 
23. GUADALUPE RIVER AT 
VICTORIA, TX 
Location. The project site is located along the east 
bank of the Guadalupe River at Victoria, Texas. 
Existing project. The recommended plan calls for 
incorporating and improving a portion of the existing 
levee, replacing a portion of an existing floodwall at 
the Central Power and Light Company plant, and 
extending both ends of the existing levee to tie to high 
ground by building new levees. The overall proposed 
plan length is $15,260 feet. 
Local Cooperation. The City of Victoria is the 
31-14

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
local sponsor for the project. 
Operations during the fiscal year. The Detailed 
Project Study was underway throughout FY 1995 and 
was nearing completion at the end of that period. An 
implementation plan in the amount of $9,348,000 has 
been tentatively agreed upon by the local sponsor, 
subject to approval by higher authority of the Corps of 
Engineers. Construction could be initiated in late FY 
1996 if funds are available. 
24. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX 
Location. The project is located in Willacy, Hidalgo, 
and Cameron Counties. The basin is bounded on the east 
by the Gulf of Mexico, on the south by the Rio Grande 
which forms the international boundary between the 
United States and Mexico, on the west by Starr County, 
and on the north by Brooks and Kenedy Counties. 
Existing project. See individual detailed reports on 
Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville 
Drain. 
Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on 
Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville 
Drain. 
24A. ARROYO COLORADO, TX 
Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and 
Cameron Counties, Texas. 
Existing project. The authorized project will provide 
flood protection along Highway 83 and erosion protection 
for the banks of the Arroyo Colorado in the city of 
Harlingen. The project consists of a gated water control 
structure, 1.4 miles of channel improvements, and stone 
armoring of selected reaches in Harlingen. The estimated 
cost for new work is $5,851,000 Federal (Corps) and 
$1,951,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,848,000 cash 
and $103,000 for lands and relocations (October 1, 1993 
base prices). 
Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is 
Hidalgo County Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is 
required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; 
modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads 
and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a 
cash contribution presently estimated at $1,848,000 and 
bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement 
of flood control facilities. 
Opeations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 
36, Planning and Engineering. 
24B. SOUT MAIN CHNE TX 
Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Willacy 
Counties, Texas. 
Existing project. The authorized project consists of 
channel improvements which will provide flood protection 
to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa 
and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and 
Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. The estimated 
cost for new work is $114,724,000 Federal (Corps) and 
$66,695,000 non-Federal consisting of $9,070,000 cash 
and $28,107,000 lands and $29,518,000 relocations 
(October 1, 1995 base prices). 
Local cooperation. Local sponsors for the project are 
Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County 
Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is required to provide 
lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate 
buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, 
except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution 
presently estimated at $9,070,000 and bear all costs of 
operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control 
facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 
36, Planning and Engineering funds. 
24C. RAYMONDVILLE DRAIN, TX 
Location. The project is located in northern Hidalgo 
and Willacy Counties, Texas. 
Existing project. The authorized project will provide 
a drainage outlet to the Laguna Madres for northern 
Hidalgo and Willacy Counties. The project consists of 
43.8 miles of channel work, including enlargement of 
existing channels and construction of new channels, a 
3.88-mile long levee, and diversion ditches along the 
west side of Raymondville. The estimated cost for new 
work is $52,951,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,651,000 
non-Federal consisting of $4,778,000 cash and $6,142,000 
lands and $6,731,000 relocations (October 1, 1995 base 
prices). 
Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is 
Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County 
Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is required to provide 
lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate 
buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, 
except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution 
presently estimated at $4,778,000 and bear all costs of 
operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control 
facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Project is 
awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 
25. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX 
(HURRICANE-FIDOD PROTECTION) 
Location. Port Arthur is on west shore of Sabine 
Lake in extreme southeast part of Texas, about 14 miles 
from the gulf. Area under consideration is comprised of 
about 38,500 acres, and includes cities of Port Arthur 
and Groves, towns of Griffin Park, Pearl Ridge, and 
Lakeview, and adjacent industrial areas. 
Existing project. Authorized plan provides for raising 
and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing concrete and 
steel sheet-pile seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new 
concrete and sheet-pile seawall; raising and improving 
3.0 miles of existing earth levees; constructing 20.3 
miles of new earth levees and constructing five interior 
drainage pumping plants. Raising and strengthening of 
levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water 
reservoir was placed in the "inactive" category in December 
1980. The project was initiated in March 1966 and the 
active portion of the project was completed in 1984. 
Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, 
is $62,350,000 Federal (Corps) and $27,150,000 non- 
Federal consisting of $17,342,000 cash contributions, 
$3,403,000 for lands, $6,405,000 for relocations, and 
31-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
$449,000 for pumping station betterments and levee 
realignment betterments. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operation during fiscal year. A severe settlement 
problem exists in the Chevron Sabine Road Tank Farm 
area. A contract to restore the embankment was awarded 
May 19,1994 and completed May 3, 1995. The Fiscal 
Year 1995 cost was $853,258. 
26. SIMS BAYOU, TX 
Location. The project is located in Harris County, in 
the southern portion of Houston, Texas. 
Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement 
provides for enlargement and rectification, with appropriate 
erosion control measures, of 19.3 miles of Sims Bayou to 
provide 25-year flood protection; environmental measures 
and riparian habitat improvement along the entire 
alignment; and recreational development to include 27 
miles of hike-and-bike trails connecting to existing public 
parks, together with picnic, playground, and other leisure 
facilities. Estimated cost for new work is $187,437,000 
Federal (Corps) and $96,440,000 non-Federal consisting 
of $16,677,000 cash contributions, $35,858,000 for lands, 
$43,625,000 for relocations and $280,000 for channels 
(October 1, 1995 base price). 
Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is 
Harris County Flood Control District. In accordance 
with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local 
interests are required to provide lands, easements, and 
rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, 
utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, 
where necessary for the construction of the project; pay 
one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to 
recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance 
and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 5 percent 
of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs 
of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control 
facilities. The Local Cooperation Agreement for flood 
control was executed on October 19, 1990. The recreation 
Local Cooperation Agreement is pending. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A 
construction contract for channel rectification from 
Interstate Highway 45 to Reveille Park was awarded 
January 28, 1994 and continued through FY 1995 at a 
fiscal year cost of $1,792,475. Construction contract 
for channel rectification from Hemingway Drive to 
Reveille Park was awarded December 22, 1994 and 
continued through FY 1995 at a cost of $2,414,454. An 
architect/engineering contract for preparing plans, 
technical specifications and quality estimates for 
construction of channel improvements between Mykawa 
Road and Hemingway Drive, approximately Stations 
391+00 to 316+71 was awarded February 22, 1995 and 
continued through FY 1995 at a cost of $423,672. 
27. STATE HIGHWAY 111 BRIDGE, LAKE 
TEXANA, TX 
Location. The project is located 8.5 miles Southeast 
of Edna, Texas and 31 miles Northeast of Victoria, 
Texas. 
Existing project. The plan of improvement requires 
placement of granular fill and stone protection along the 
embankment slope at the southwest end of the East 
Relief Bridge to form a slope of 1 on 4. Stone protection 
will consist of an 18-inch layer of riprap placed on a 6- 
inch layer of graded blanket stone. The work will require 
placement of 2400 tons of granular fill, 390 tons of 
blanket stone and 1170 tons of stone riprap. Estimated 
cost for new work is $276,000 Federal (Corps) and $92,000 
non-Federal consisting of $91,600 cash contribution and 
$400 for land. 
Local cooperation. The State of Texas is the local 
sponsor for the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement 
was executed on July 17, 1992. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans 
and specifications were completed in April 1992. A 
construction contract for embankment slope repairs, which 
consist of clearing, excavation, removal and disposal of 
material, and placement of stone protection, was awarded 
December 28, 1993 and completed February 18, 1994. 
The project was turned over to the State of Texas in 
May 31, 1994. 
28. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX 
Location. Watershed of Taylors Bayou is in extreme 
southeast corner of Texas adjoining basins of Neches 
River and Sabine Lake on the east. City of Port Arthur 
is about 8 miles from the main stream of Taylors Bayou. 
Existing project. Improvement consists of enlarging 
and rectifying approximately 53 miles of natural and 
artificial channels on Taylors Bayou and tributary water 
courses. Phase I consists of constructing a gated structure 
to prevent saltwater intrusion and 2.9 miles of new 
diversion channel and enlarging 1.8 miles of Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway and a 1.9 mile section of the 
Outfall Canal. Phase II consists of enlarging 6.0 miles of 
Taylors Bayou, 14.3 miles of Hillebrandt Bayou, 1.5 
miles of Pivitot Bayou, 2.3 miles of Bayou Din, and 3.5 
miles of Willow Marsh Bayou. Phase III consists of 
enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 
miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of 
Mayhaw Bayou. The Phase III portion of the project was 
placed in the "inactive" category in November 1980. 
Initial contract on the "active" portion of the project was 
awarded in August 1982. All work on authorized features 
has been completed with the exception of Phase III and 
minor work, which includes armoring a small reach of 
the Alligator Bayou effluent ditch. Estimated cost for 
new work, excluding inactive portion, is $39,100,000 
Federal (Corps) and $41,100,000 non-Federal, including 
$13,419 cash contribution, $3,662,000 lands, and 
$24,019,000 for relocations (October 1, 1993 base price). 
Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control 
Act, applies. 
Operation during fiscal year. Channel rectification 
contract for Hillebrandt Bayou Station 543+50 to Station 
751+00, awarded January 13, 1992 and physically 
completed March 19, 1993, was financially completed in 
March 1995 at a fiscal year cost of $97,235. The contract 
for channel rectification on Willow Marsh Bayou, Stations 
12+00 to 135+00, awarded December 12, 1991, and 
31-16

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
physically completed March 20, 1993, was financially 
completed December 15, 1994 at a cost of $67,854 for FY 
1995. A contract for channel rectification of Hillebrandt 
Bayou, Station 350+00 to Station 543+50, awarded 
January 13, 1993 and completed in September 1994, was 
financially completed in September 1994 with a credit 
adjustment of $2,708. The dredging contract for plug 
removal, drainage and flood control of Hillebrandt Bayou 
and Willow Marsh Bayou, awarded April 6, 1994 and 
physically completed October 24, 1994, was financially 
completed March 30, 1995 at a final cost of $328,274. A 
construction contract for erosion protection at Star Lake 
Water Control structure was awarded August 1, 1995 
and continued through FY 1995 at a cost of $114,980. 
(See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 
29. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLODOD CONTROL WORKS 
Inspections of completed projects operated and 
maintained by local interests were made on the following 
projects. Fiscal year cost was $95,355. 
DM IPf 
Project 
Texas City, TX - Hurricane 
Flood Protection 
Corpus Christi Beach, TX - Beach 
Restoration 
Clear Creek, TX - Second Outlet 
Gated Structure 
Taylors Bayou, TX - Star Lake 
Inspection 
March 1995 
June 1995 
June 1995 
June 1995 
30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to section 205 of 
1970 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, 
as amended: 
Construction of the flood protection project for Buffalo 
Bayou, Texas (Lynchburg Pump Station) is discussed in 
Section 18. 
Construction of the flood protection project for 
Guadalupe River at Victoria, Texas is discussed in Section 
23. 
Initial appraisal study for flood control on the Liberty 
Levee, Liberty, Texas was completed at a fiscal year cost 
of $10,000 and terminated due to lack of economic 
justificiation. 
A study for flood control for the Brazos Valley 
Subdivision at Simonton, Texas was completed at a fiscal 
year costs of $10,000 and is awaiting funds to continue 
the reconnaissance phase. 
Emergency flood control - repair, flood fighting, and 
rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent 
legislation): 
Disaster Preparedness cost for Fiscal Year 1995 was 
$310,398. National Emergency Preparedness Program 
fiscal year cost was $102,968. 
Emergency Operations for the fall floods of October 
1994 in Liberty County received reimbursement for 
response, field investigations, and post flood activities in 
the amounts of $64,707, $5,478, and $25,408 respectively 
for a total of $95,593 in Fiscal Year 1995. 
31. EMERGENCY STREAM BANK AND 
SHORELINE EROSION WORK AND 
SNAGGING AND CLEARING 
ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
Stream bank and shoreline erosion activities pursuant 
to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 
525, as amended: 
Construction of the erosion control project at State 
Highway Bridge 111, Lake Texana, Texas is discussed in 
Section 27. 
Construction of the steambank protection project at 
Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point Village, Texas is discussed 
in Section 19. 
Snagging and clearing activities for flood control 
pursuant to Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954, 
Public Law 780, as amended: 
No new feasibility studies of snagging and clearing 
activities for flood control improvements were performed 
in fiscal year 1995. 
Environmental Restoration 
32. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR 
IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT 
Project modifications for improvement of environment 
activities pursuant to Section 1135 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, as amended: 
Construction of the environmental restoration project 
at Laguna Madre, Texas is discussed in Section 33. 
Construction of the environmental restoration project 
at Salt Bayou, McFaddin Ranch, Texas is discussed in 
Section 34. 
Plans and specifications and environmental 
documentation was initiated for restoration of the wetlands 
at Barker Reservoir for a waterfowl habitat. Project title 
is Addicks and Barker Waterfowl Habitat Restoration, 
Texas. A total cost of $14,198 was incurred for FY 
1995. 
33. LAGUNA MADRE SEAGRASS 
PROJECT 
Locatio. The project is located in Laguna Madre 
about 7 miles north of Port Isabel, Texas in Cameron 
County. 
Existing project. The objective of the proposed project 
is to determine whether unconfined open-bay disposal 
operations can be modified to increase the seagrass 
colonization rate between dredging cycles and improve 
habitat value for estuarine fauna in the disposal area. 
The work consists of transplanting seagrass from nearby 
undisturbed seagrass meadows onto freshly deposited 
dredged maintenance material in two open-bay disposal 
31-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
areas near the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The 
transplanted seagrass and control sites will be sampled 
and monitored for various physical and biological 
parameters to determine the success of the demonstration 
project in restoring fish habitat in the disposal areas. 
Local cooperation. The local sponsor for this project 
is the Texas Department of Transportation. A Project 
Cocieration Agreement was executed on October 6, 1994. 
Operations during fiscal year. Two contracts to 
transplant seagrass were awarded in FY 95. Thefirst 
contract was awarded June 5, 1995 and completed June 
21, 1995 for a cost of $16,811. The second contract was 
awarded September 8, 1995 and completed October 3, 
1995 for a cost of $21,010. National Marine Fisheries 
continued to monitor the development of the seagrass 
and the associated marine community. 
34. SALT BAYOU WATER CONTROL 
STRUCTURE, PORT ARTHUR, TX 
Location. The project is located in the McFaddin 
National Wildlife Refuge, Sea Rim State Park, and J.D. 
Murphree Wildlife Management Area, near the City of 
Port Arthur, Jefferson County, Texas. 
Existing project. This project provides for the second 
of two water control structures needed to restore historical 
salinity conditions to a 60,000-acre wetland area. Prior 
to construction of the GIWW and Sabine-Neches Waterway, 
Salt Bayou consisted of fresh to brackish marshlands. 
Construction of the Sabine-Neches Waterway and GIWW 
disrupted natural drainage patterns and introduced salt 
water to the marsh. Increased salinity resulted in 
conversion of vegetated areas to open water and a 
reduction in wildlife habitat values. With this new 
structure at Salt Lake, historical estuarine conditions 
will be restored to the extent possible. Work consists of 
a Water Control Structure, 27,000 C.Y. of excavation, 
4,600 tons of riprap, and 1,428 LF. of precast prestressed 
concrete piles. A construction contract for the water 
control structure was awarded on 18 November 1994. 
The total estimated project cost is $2,264,500, of which 
$1,698,375 is Federal (Corps) and $566,125 is non-Federal. 
Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the Texas 
Parks and Wildlife Department. A Project Cooperation 
Agreement was executed on March 8, 1994. 
Operations during fiscal year. A construction 
contract for the water control structure was awarded 
November 18, 1994 and was physically compled October 
5, 1995. The cost for Fiscal Year 1995 was $1,621,663. 
General Investigations 
35. SURVEYS 
Fiscal year costs were $1,406,619 of which $174,640 
was for navigation studies; $115,995 was for flood damage 
prevention studies; $973,517 was for Review of Completed 
Projects; $6,973 was for coordination with other agencies; 
$112,424 was for Special Investigations; $8,017 for 
Interagency Water Resources; $14,066 was for National 
Estuary Studies; $444 for the American Waterfowl 
Management Plan;and $542 for the National Marine 
Fisheries Services. 
36. PLANNING AND ENGINEERING 
Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, Texas -The project 
will provide erosion protection and limited spill 
containment for the existing alignment of the Fulf 
Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW) along a 31-mile reach of 
the GIWW which crosses the critical wintering habitat 
of the rare and endangered whooping crane. The project 
includes a 13.25-mile reach within the boundary of the 
Aransas National Wildlife Refuge. The dredged material 
management plan includes marsh creation with the 
beneficial uses of dredged material. Estimated planning 
and engineering estimate is $1,860,000. Planning and 
engineering studies were initiated in FY 1995. Fiscal 
year costs were $133,429. 
Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas - The 
project will provide for enlargement of the Houston Ship 
Channel and Galveston Ship Channel. The recommended 
plan for the Houston Ship Channel consists of a 50-foot 
deep by 600-foot wide channel to the vicinity of the Shell 
Docks at Boggy Bayou in Houston with additional 
widening to the Clinton Island Turning Basin. The 
recommended plan for the Galveston Channel consists of 
a 50-foot deep by 450-foot wide channel within the existing 
1,125-foot channel. The 50-foot by 800-foot entrance 
channel, previously authorized with the Texas City 
Channel but unconstructed, is also incorporated into 
this project. The project was recommended to be 
constructed in two phases, with Phase I enlarging the 
Houston Ship Channel to 45 by 530 feet, the Galveston 
Ship Channel enlarged to 45 by 450 feet, and deepening 
the entrance channel to 45 feet. Phase II would deepen 
both channels to 50 feet and widen the Houston Ship 
Channel to 600 feet. A locally preferred dredged material 
disposal plan for Galveston Bay has been incorporated 
with the plan of improvement. The plan would utilize 
confined or beneficial uses of dredged material in the bay 
and/or offshore disposal for Phase I and Phase II 
construction activities and the operations and maintenance 
resulting from them. The 50-foot increment (Phase II) 
was found to not be economically justified and the local 
sponsors have agreed that the work on this increment be 
stopped. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is 
$19,600,000. Estimated planning and engineering studies 
were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were 
$2,363,701. 
Brays Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 3 
miles of stream improvements, 3 flood detention basins, 
and 7 miles of stream diversion channels. Aesthetic 
vegetation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, 
picnic facilities, sports fields, comfort stations and parking 
areas. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is 
$6,900,000. Planning and engineering studies were 
initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $478,923. 
Greens Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 
25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream 
clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation 
and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include 
trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, 
comfort stations and parking areas. Estimated planning 
31-18

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
and engineering estimate is $5,600,000. Planning and 
engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal 
year costs were $377,302 
Cypress Creek, Texas - The project will provide for 
enlargement of the lower 29.4 miles of the channel. 
Project-oriented recreation features include 11.5 miles of 
hike-and-bike trails and related recreation facilities, habitat 
management measures on 844 acres of Harris County 
Parkway project land, creation of wooded and brush 
habitat along 100 acres of project right-of-way, acquisition 
of 329 acres of wildlife habitat, and creation of 35 acres 
of ponds and marshes. Estimated planning and engineering 
estimate is $3,800,000. Planning and engineering studies 
were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $258,497 
and $235,257 was expended from sponsor contributed 
funds. 
Arroyo Colorado, Texas - The project will provide 
flood protection along Highway 83 and erosion protection 
for the banks of the Arroyo Colorado in the city of 
Harlingen. The project consists of a gated water control 
structure, 1.4 miles of channel improvements, and stone 
armoring of selected reaches in Harlingen. Estimated 
planning and engineering estimate is $974,000. Planning 
and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990 and 
completed in FY 1995. Fiscal year costs were $17,987. - 
South Main Channel, Texas - The project consists of 
channel improvements which will provide flood protection 
to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa 
and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and 
Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. Estimated 
planning and engineering estimate is $6,250,000. Planning 
and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal 
year costs were $1,681,008. 
Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier, 
Texas - The project consists of a tainter gated salt water 
barrier structure, a gated navigation bypass channel, an 
access road and levee, and an auxiliary dam across an 
associated canal. Estimated planning and engineering 
estimate is $3,000,000. A review of the project economics 
was completed in FY 1994. Fiscal year costs were $93,376. 
37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC 
DATA 
Flood plain management, technical services and quick 
responses were performed at a cost of $15,034, $33,100 
and $3,230, respectively. Contributed funds in the amount 
of $325 were expended in FY 1995 for technical services. 
Hydrologic studies cost $16,727. 
Flood plain management services were initiated for 
the Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribe at Big Sandy, Texas 
for a fiscal year cost of $6,274 and continued for Santa 
Monica for a fiscal year costs of $18,026. 
31-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost To 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995" 
1. Aquatic Plant Control 
(Southwestern Division) 
1965 Act 
2. Brazos Island 
Harbor, TX 
3. Cedar Bayou, TX 
4. Channel to Port 
Bolivar, TX 
5. Corpus Christi Ship 
Channel, TX 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
6. Freeport Harbor, TX 
7. Galveston Harbor and 
Channel, TX 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Minor Rehab: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab: 
Approp. 
Cost 
235,000 
209,979 
292000 
317,642 
275,000 
219,974 
1,971,000 4,973,000 5,913,000 
1,887,976 4,181,644 4,143,377 
2,267,000 
2,571,235 
224,000 
220,848 
479,000 
3,167,008 
4,472,6001 
4,329,525' 
27,343,5022 
27,290,2742 
70,000 2,123,000 1,980,000 51,913,4763 
8069,987 2,112,333 1,982,037 51,901,5953 
- - - 2,170,080 
- - - 2,170,080 
25,000 
24,892 
(10,400) 
28,046 
5,110,000 
5,481,015 
1,000 
593 
300,000 
78,065 
2,903,000 
2,786,618 
- 24,070 
13,534,000 5,128,000 
13,967,880 4,445,978 
1,095,000 4,299,500 
958,033 4,430,683 
279,000 4,664,200 3,184,000 
270,875 4,659,585 3,170,293 
(440) 
46 
300,000 
404,198 
5,000 
5,003 
21,919 
681,263' 
681,2634 
2,834,8166 
2,834,7086 
133,9256 
133,9256 
1,231,061 
1,231,0617 
77,135,3596 
77,004,0438 
6,194,000 5,241,800 111,705,5489 
6,247,886 4,873,769 111,255,4998 
- - 3,576,684 
- - 3,576,684 
- - 6,279,088 
- 10,033 5,993,265 
1,300,000 (800,000) 58,060,15210 
350,007 542,125 57,471,76510 
2,347,000 2,703,500 60,930,415" 
2,347,937 2,708,717 60,928,183" 
- - 8,935 
- - 8,935 
- 29,096,39212 
- 29,096,39212 
4,667,200 98,306,28813 
4,710,615 98,255,31413 
- 7,969,329 
- 7,969,329 
31-20

GALVESTON, TEXAS. DISTRICT 
TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost To 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 199580 
8. Gulf Intracoastal New Work: 
Waterway between 
Apalachee Bay, FL and 
the Mexican Border 
(Galveston District) 
(Regular Funds) 
(Inland Waterways 
Trust Fund) 
(Regular Funds) 
(Inland Waterways 
Trust Fund) 
(Regular Funds) 
9. Houston Ship 
Channel, TX 
(Regular Funds) 
10. Matagorda, Ship 
Channel, TX 
(Regular Funds) 
11. Sabine-Neches 
Waterway, TX 
(Regular Funds) 
12. Texas City Channel, TX 
13. Trinity River and 
Tributaries, TX 
(Includes Wallisville) 
16. Corpus Christi Beach, 
TX (Restoration Project) 
(Contributed Funds) 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint: 
Appr 
Cost 
Major Rehab 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab 
Approp. 
Cost 
Minor Rehab 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
3,157,000 1,950,000 5,786,000 3,704,194 90,235,49714 
3,082,996 1,644,840 1,774,646 6,717,663 88,629,15314 
- 2,544,000 3,751,000 
- 1,583,471 4,144,554 
6,295,000 
5,728,025 
23,287,700 17,130,800 24,871,000 27,826,450 364,766,492's 
23,794,094 17,844,147 24,261,481 28,655,473 364,655,56016 
- 1,000,000 
- 63,521 
- 1,000,000 
- 56,631 
1,946,000 
1,39,800 
1,946,000 
1,308,974 
3,380,638 
1,896,959 
2,946,000 
1,365,605 
- - - 835,873 
-.- - - 835,873 
-- - - 35,760,38217 
- - - 35,760,3821? 
2,380,500 9,805,000 4,050,900 11,912,050 157,495,72818 
2,311,819 9,856,764 3,990,130 11,989,150 157,485,85618 
-- - - 18,058,77719 
-- - - 18,058,77719 
2,379,200 
2,678,164 
4,952,000 
5,893,587 
201,000 
166,220 
2,257,188 
795,000 
819,140 
2,393,500 5,209,540 
2,272,781 5,355,402 
3,345,000 12,620,000 
3,574,422 12,543,607 
1,483,500 
1,521,052 
2,700,000 
3,114,931 
356,500 
403,226 
452,000 
424,763 
8,000,000 
2,719,171 
2,074,000 
2,040,590 
147,500 54,721,978 
13,491 54,575,79? 
- 56,136,81521 
- 56,136,81521 
3,304,000 190,104,540 
3,425,495 190,096,988 
- 15,131,972 
- 15,131,972m 
921,000 27,539,0114 
943,524 27,534,238 
- 726,158 
- 726,158 
1,000,000 44,923,678 
3,010,334 40,776,780 
1,654,000 19,306,514m 
1,661,395 19,260,811w 
- 2,120,641 
- 2,120,641 
- 2,038,345 
- 2,009,710 
31-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 31-A 
See 
Section 
in Text Project 
17. Buffalo Bayou and 
Tributaries, TX 
18. Buffalo Bayou at 
Lynchburg , TX 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
19. Buffalo Bayou at 
Piney Point, TX 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
20. Clear Creek, TX 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
21. Cypress Creek, TX 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
22. Falfurrias, TX 
23. Guadalupe River at 
Victoria, TX 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
24. Lower Rio Grande 
Basin, TX 
25. Port Arthur and 
Vicinity, TX Hurricane- 
Flood Protection 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
26. Sims Bayou, TX 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
Funding 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Recreation: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Dam Safety: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Total Cost To 
FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 19 9 5" 
1,249,100 
1,018,131 
11,500 
1,642,000 
1,678,401 
1,450,000 
1,449,168 
(14,500) 
2,450 
20,000 
15,921 
460,000 
758,300 
750,000 
216,496 
424 
13,000 
113,257 
118,725 
726,900 
626,365 
96,000 
77,157 
41,000 
32,850 
1,190,000 
1,301,424 
813,000 
1,210,570 
880,000 
885,410 
1,297,000 1,685,000 
1,357,827 1,668,586 
931 
20,000 
1,427 
182,750 
78,000 
72,592 
617,000 
453,258 
(456,000) 
228,779 
5,087 
5,423 
13,367 
516,000 
413,391 
170,000 
116,523 
45,800 
31,377 
1,514,000 
1,381,353 
2,730 
123,800 
100,358 
71,971 
35,000 
39,487 
140,000 
506,000 
282,821 
254,000 
195,497 
169,200 
105,426 
147,500 
97,349 
100,400 
76,056 
359,000 
518,116 
2,100,000 
713,344 
522,900 
302,813 
8,100,000 
5,132,752 
600,000 
84,592 
704,000 62,536,424 
856,225 62,520,36027 
- 377,804 
- 377,623 
2,292,000 30,178,115 
2,246,100 30,060,754 
- 12,475,000 
- 12,475,000 
(79,300) 12,693,700 
2,136 12,693,700 
66000 255,300 
87,634 234,738 
90,596 273,346 
62,275 134,246 
367,000 500,000 
295,366 423,366 
- 140,000 
139,338 139,338 
1,213,000 15,198,361 
1,178,005 14,586,805 
- 640,000 
- 618,596 
174,100 1,500,100 
258,497 1500,009 
175,000 344,200 
235,257 340,683 
(546) 103,454 
- 103,453 
40,000 535,787 
93,864 534,373 
92,100 483,970 
106,025 473,462 
1,631,500 3,749,400 
1,698,995 3,708,237 
(715,000) 61,553,509 
747,921 61,546,270 
75,000 
168,131 
5,080,000 
8,042,245 
400,000 
632,223 
16,976,675m 
16,824,957" 
22,479,000 
22,315,600 
1,000,000 
716,815 
31-22

GALVESTON, TEXAS. DISTRICT 
TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Section Total Cost To 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 19953 
27. State Highway 111i New Work: 
Bridge, Lake Texana, TX 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
28. Taylors Bayou, TX 
(Regular Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
33. Laguna Madre 
Seagrase 
(Contributed Funds) 
34. Salt Bayou, McFaddin 
Ranch Wetlands, TX 
(Contributed Funds) 
Approp. 
Cost. 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
9,000 
7,131 
2,903,000 
3,158,775 
1,491,000 
1,798,713 
15,000 
24,238 
70,000 
150,405 
21,155 
23,439 
155,000 
150,675 
- 95,000 
- 61.774 
3,477,000 2,010,000 
3,425,816 2,129,557 
2,470,600 
1,916,405 
105 
233,000 
173,653 
700,000 
652,181 
5,000 
303 
59,556 
(20,000) 
(9,525) 
(23,630) 
9,596 
300,000 
573,039 
24,721 
143,621 
103,000 
49,184 
44,000 
19,275 
1,456,900 
1,360,422 
- 608,97 
- 405416 
214,155 
214,155 
71,370 
71,370 
37,453,198 
37,320,944 
12,995,321 
12,412,447 
133,000 
74,220 
44,000 
19,275 
1,943,900 
1,847,410 
608,097 
405,416 
Excludes $1,637,270 credit for contributed work. 
2 Includes $675,855 for previous projects. In addition, 
$10,310,549 expended from contributed funds, of which 
$123,361 was for previous projects. Excludes $874,258 expended 
from contributed funds for dock removal for the local 
sponsor. 
s In addition, $1,352,092 expended from contributed 
funds and $34,000 expended from contributed funds for Port 
Isabel. 
' Includes $39,087 for previous projects. In addition 
$25,000 expended from contributed funds. 
$ Includes $69,784 for previous projects. 
6 Includes $48,711 for previous projects. 
' Includes $46,101 for previous projects. 
8 Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes 
$456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Pbrt Aransas Breakwaters. In 
addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port 
Aransas Breakwaters. 
9 Includes $62,452 for previous projects. In addition, 
$985,345 expended from contributed funds. 1 Includes $147,098 for previous projects. In addition, 
$19,355,952 expended from contributed funds. ($581,615 
on 45' project.) 
11 In addition, $229,311 expended from contributed 
funds. 
12 Includes $8,421,996 for previous projects. In addition, 
$3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. 
13 Includes $86,126 for previous projects. In addition, 
$2,322,583 expended from contributed funds. 
14 Includes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes 
Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); 
Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); 
and Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). In addition contributed 
funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin 
($46,559); Offatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass 
($347,950); Chocolate Bayou ($658,310); and Mouth of Colorado 
River ($3,340,601). 
15 Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition 
$22,672 expended from contributed funds. Includes 
following amounts for tributary channels separately funded 
starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $7,972,480. 
Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600. Chocolate Bayou Channel 
$2,208,000. Includes following amounts for tributary channels 
separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel 
to Harlingen $3,499,050. Channel to Port Mansfield 
$4,787,785. Also includes $5,220,000 for Mouth of Colorado 
River, separately funded beginning in fiscal year 1992. 
16 Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In 
addition $22,672 expended from contributed funds. Includes 
following amounts for tributary channels separately 
funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria 
$7,962,861, Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600, Chocolate 
Bayou Channel $2,207,172. In addition $955,574 was expended 
from contributed funds for Chocolate Bayou Channel. 
Also includes amounts for tributary channels separately 
funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to 
Harlingen $3,498,592. Channel to Port Mansfield $4,767,277. 
Also includes an expended amount of $5,216,332 for Mouth 
of Colorado River, separately funded in fiscal year 1992. 
17 Includes $4,105,157 for previous projects. In 
addition, $2,591,939 expended from contributed funds, of 
which $1,209,179 was for previous projects. 
18 Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects. In 
addition, $534,641 expended from contributed funds for 
Houston Ship Channel, of which $200,000 was for previous 
projects and $125,000 expended from contributed funds for 
Greens Bayou Channel. Includes appropriated funds for 
tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal 
year 1992 Greens Bayou Channel $562,000. Barbour Terminal 
Channel $951,400. Bayport Ship Channel $3,129,075. 
Expenditures for tributary channels separately funded 
starting in fiscal year 1992: Greens Bayou Channel $560,486. 
Barbour Terminal Channel $951,106. Bayport Ship Channel 
$3,129,028. 
19 In addition, $12,259,619 expended from contributed 
funds and $182,800 for contributed lands. 
31-23 
-Z V 'ii Ir[ _ 

TABLE 3:
REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost To 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995� 
2 Starting in fiscal year 1990 includes an appropriation 
of $2,324,740 and expenditures of $2,179,783 for Channel 
to Red Bluff. 
21 Includes $5,180,832 for previous projects. In addition, 
$2,680,942 expended from contributed funds, of which 
$577,507 was for previous projects. 
22 Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects. In addition, 
$4,490,297 expended from contributed funds and $5,793 
expended from contributed funds for real estate acquisition 
for the local sponsor. 
23 Includes $366,823 for previous projects. In addition, 
$1,023,819 expended from contributed funds, of which 
$99,000 was for mitigation measures. 
24 Includes $195,083 for previous projects. 
25 Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. In addition, 
$66,000 expended from contributed funds. 
26 Includes $543,662 for previous projects. 
27 Includes $4,400,000 of advanced funds repaid to 
Harris County Flood Control District. In addition, $63,661 
contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou and $12,900 
Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for 
enlargement of Clodine D)itch. 
2 Excludes $3,402,588 estimated value of contributed 
lands, $6,168,360 for relocations, and $217,000 credit given 
local sponsor for work-in-kind. 2 9 Excludes $146,400 expended from contributed funds 
for real estate acquisition for the local sponsor. 
30 Includes funds ($12,544,400) provided by the Jobs 
Act (P.L 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in 
Table 15-I of Annual Report for 1985. 
31-24

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
1. Oct. 27, 1965 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Jun. 3, 1930 
May 24, 1934 
(PWA) 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 24, 1946 
May 17, 1950 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Nov. 17, 1986 
2. 
TABLE 31-B 
AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL 
Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic 
plant growth from the navigable waters and streams 
in the U.S. 
Amended cost sharing requirements to provide for 50 
percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal participation 
in control operations. 
BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX 
Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. 
Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution 
of funds to cover cost of original dredging 
of all inside channels and basins. 
Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and 
Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. 
Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. 
Deepen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet 
channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet 
channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at 
Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; 
and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of 
Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre 
and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. 
Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and 
Brownsville channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels 
at Port Isabel to GIWW. 
Deepen to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in 
all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing 
turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; 
and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel 
next to Brownsville ship channel. 
Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 
feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning 
basin extension, thence at a width of 500 feet 
and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 
36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, 
maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a 
connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with 
necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island 
Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 
Enlargement of the entrance channel from deep water 
in the Gulf of Mexico to the Laguna Madre to a 
depth of 44 feet and a width of 400 feet; enlargement 
of the Turning Basin Extension to a point 800 feet 
beyond the grain elevator to a depth of 42 feet at 
widths varying from 325 to 400 feet; removal of 
Brownsville Navigation District Wharves 5, 6, and 9 
to permit widening of the adjacent portion of the 
Turning Basin to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet; 
construction of asphalt walkways with handrails on 
the crown of the North and South Jetties, and construction 
of park-type public use facilities at the 
inner end of the North Jetty. 
31-25 
H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Sec. 103(c), PL 99-662 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 16, 
71st Cong., 2nd Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 10, 
71st Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 32, 
75th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 335, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 347, 77th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 627, 't9th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 192, 81st Cong., 
1st Seas. 
H. Doc. 428, 86th Cong., 
2nd Sess.' 
Sec. 201, PL 99-662

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Date 
Authorizing 
Act Project and Work Authorized 
3. 
4. 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Jun. 25, 1910 
Mar. 4, 1919 
Mar. 3, 1899 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Mar. 3, 1905 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Feb. 27, 1911 
Mar. 4, 19132 
Sep. 23, 1922 
Jul. 3, 1930 ' 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 19354 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug 30, 1935 
31-26 
TABLE 
See 
Section 
in Text 
CEDAR BAYOU, TX 
Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Houston 
Ship Channel to a point on bayou 11 miles above 
mouth.9 
CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX 
A channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep 
water in Galveston Harbor extending to a turning 
basin 1,000 feet square and 30 feet deep.31 
Enlargement, extension and protection of turning basin.
31 
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX 
Acquisition of old curvey portion of north jetty previously 
constructed by private parties. 
Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. 
Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. 
Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct 
south jetty. 
Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep 
and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. 
Joseph Island. 
Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 
feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend dike on St. 
Joseph Island 9,100 feet, and dredge approach channel 
12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. 
Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 
25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom width. 
Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and 
provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced 
area but greater depth. 
Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel 
with depth 30 feet. 
Enlarge all channels from gulf to western end of basin 
dredge by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks 
on Harbor Island. 
Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater 
and western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. 
Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning 
basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning 
basin at Avery Point. 
Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep 
water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin 
at Corpus Christi. 
S. Doc 107, 71st Cong., 
2nd Sess.1 
H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 1122, 65th Cong., 
2nd Sess.' 
Specified in Act. 
Specified in Act. 
Specified in Act. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 5, 
59th Cong., 2nd Sees. 
H. Doc. 1094, 61st Cong., 
3rd Sess. 
H. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 
3rd Sess. 
H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 9, 
71st Cong., 1st Sess. 
Committee Docs. 35, 72nd 
Cong., 1st Sess., and 40, 
73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 130, 72nd Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 13, 
74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 63, 
74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Documents 
I

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
5. Jun. 20, 1938 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jun. 30, 1948 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Sep. 3, 19546 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Jul. 14, 1960 
(As amended by 
Dec. 31, 1970) 
Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 
2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen 
existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet 
and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and 
general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay 
shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 
feet long near Tule Lake. 
Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and 
basins from Port Aransas to and including Tule Lake 
turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port 
Aransas to breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width 
of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between 
Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and 
widen Avery Point turning basin to 1,000 feet. 
Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer 
end of jetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to 
station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep 
water channels and basins except 2,000-foot undredged 
part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 
400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering 
basin at Corpus Christi. 
An anchorage basin 12 feet deep, from 300 to 400 feet 
wide, and 900 feet long in Turtle Cove at Port Aransas, 
Texas. 
Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly 
from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along 
north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals 
Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet 
square near plant in general vicinity of LaQuinta, 
Texas. 
An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alignment 
from 400-foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, 
near Corpus Christi breakwater to flared approach 
channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. 
Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; 
enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 
feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at 
curves. 
Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gulf to outer 
end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels 
and basins except undredged northward extehsion to 
inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to 
LaQuinta; and widen Industrial Channel to 400 feet 
with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery 
Point turning basins. 
Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule 
Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 
700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. 
Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally 
dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel 
to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption 
of maintenance by United States. 
Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area 
at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot 
by 100-foot project channel. 
31-27 
TABLE 31-B 
H. Doc. 574, 75th Cong., 
3rd Sess. 
H. Doc. 544, 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 560, 80th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 654, 81st Cong., 
1st Seas. 
H. Doc. 89, 83rd Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 487, 83rd Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
S. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Sec. 107, PL 86-645

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
5. 
May 17, 1950 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Oct. 5, 1961 
Aug. 13, 1968 
Oct. 22, 1976 
Sep. 15, 1994 
Mar. 3, 1899 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Feb. 27, 1911 
Mar. 4, 1913 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Mar. 3, 19256 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935? 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing 
deep-draft channels and basins, for construction of a 
new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a 
deep draft mooring area and mooring facilities and 
for widening of the channels and basins at certain 
locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged 
northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island 
and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) 
between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel 
of the waterway. 
Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. 
Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and 
confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent 
Federal and 25 percent non-Federal responsibility. 
Assume maintenance of 17 foot by 100 foot Jewel Fulton 
Canal, after construction by local interest. 
FREEPORT HARBOR, TX 
Dredging and other work necessary in judgment of 
Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over 
jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. 
Examination authorized. Work later confined to maintenance 
of jetties. 
Repairs to jetties and dredging. 
Construct seagoing hopper dredge. 
Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, 
its operation of 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge 
one-half time for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. 
Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary 
works. 
Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local 
interest. 
Deepening channels and basins. 
Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels 
and basins at Federal expense. 
Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point 
within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels 
to and including upper turning basin. 
Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with 
jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance 
channel and turning basin (constructed by local 
interests). 
Modification of HD 1469. Revoking certain provisions of 
local cooperation. 
PL 394, 87th Cong. 
31-28 
S. Doc. 99, 90th. Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Sec. 124, PL 94-587 
Sec. 204, PL 99-662 as 
amended 
Specified in Act. 
H. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Specified in Act. 
Specified in Act. 
Specified in Act. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 10, 
68th Cong., 2nd Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 18, 
70th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 15, 
72nd Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Does. 15, 
72nd Cong., 1st Sess., 
and 29, 73rd Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
6.

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
TABLE 
See 
Section 
in Text 
Jun. 13, 1902 
Mar. 3, 1905 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Jun. 25, 1910P 
Jul. 27, 1916 
Jul. 18, 1918 
Sep. 22, 1922 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Aug. 30, 1935n 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 30, 1935 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Project and Work Authorised Documents 
6. 
31-29 
31-B 
Date 
Authorizing 
Act 
Dec. 31, 1970 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Aug. 5, 1886 
Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; 
enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of 
jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to 
45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the 
widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth 
of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; 
Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 
foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 
foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening 
Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; 
flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation 
of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. 
Modified local cooperation requirements for the 1970 
Act. 
GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX 
Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston 
Harbor. 
A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer 
end of old inner bar near Fort Point) at 51st Street.8 
Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. 
Extension of jetties to present project length and construction 
and operation of a dredge. 
Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., 
with depth of 30 feet and width of 700 feet. 
Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 
51st and 57th Sts., 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. 
Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St., and 
Broadway to vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. 
Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. 
Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction 
with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of 
Fort Crockett reservation. 
Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain 
Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet 
wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep in 
inner bar.1� 
Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to 
dimensions of 12 by 100 feet. 
Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st 
Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 
(10 groins constructed). 
Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 
43rd St.). 
7. 
H. Doc. 289, 93rd Cong., 2nd 
Sees.2 
Sec. 101, PL 99-662 
H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., 1st 
Sess., and Annual Report, 
1886, p. 1311. 
H. Doc. 264, 56th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Specified in Act. 
H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2nd 
Sess., and Rivers and 
Harbors Committee Doc. 
11, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 768, 59th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 
3rd Seas. 
H. Doc 758, 65th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., 
slet Ses. 
River and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 31, 
72nd Cong., 1st Sees. 
H. Doc. 400, 73rd Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 61, 
74th Cong., let Sees.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
7. Aug. 30, 1935 
Apr. 4, 1938 
Jun. 30, 1948 
May 17, 1950 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Jun. 23, 1971 
(House Res.) 
Nov. 18, 1971 
(Senate Res. 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Mar. 3, 1925 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Jun. 20, 193813 
Jun. 20, 1938 
Jun. 20, 1938 
Jun. 20, 1938 
Jun. 20, 1938 
Mar. 23, 1939 
Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. 
Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. 
Deepen Galveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 
2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 
feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance 
of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 
feet deep from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. 
Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point 
within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels 
to and including upper turning basin. 
Dredge to a depth of 42 feet over the authorized width 
of 800 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to a point 2 
miles west of the seawall and of the North jetty 
thence at a depth of 40 feet to the junction of the 
Houston Ship Channel, with widths of 800 feet to 
Bolivar Roads, thence decreasing to 400 feet at the 
junction with the Houston Ship Channel. 
Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar to 
43rd Street. 
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN 
APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER'2 
Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across 
Chocolate Bay to 4 feet of water in Chocolate Bay. 
Channel 9 by 100 feet, Sabine River to Galveston Bay, 
and a 20-inch pipeline dredge. Such passing places, 
widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway 
bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. 
Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. 
Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado 
River. 
Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. 
Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. 
Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios 
and Matagorda Bays. 
Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at 
Rockport and improve harbor to 9-foot depth. 
Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas 
Pass, Texas. 
Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 
125 feet from Sabine River to Corpus Christi. 
31-30 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 57, 
74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
PL 463, 75th Cong. 
H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 121, 92nd Cong. 
H. Doc 445, 56th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
S. Committee print, 
75th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 
3rd Sess. 
H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 
3rd Sess. 
H. Doc. 564, 75th Cong., 
3rd Sess. 
H. Doc. 641, 75th Cong., 
3rd Sess. 
H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 
3rd Sess. 
H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
8.

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Jul. 23, 1942 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 19459 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 194514 
Jul. 24, 1946 
Jul. 24, 1946 
May 17, 1950 
May 17, 1950 
May 17, 1950 
Jul. 12, 1952 
Sep. 3, 195415 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Sep. 9, 1959 
Construct waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity of 
Mexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and 
width of 125 feet throughout. 
Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate 
Bayou near Liverpool. 
Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel 
near Port O'Connor, Texas, in Barroom Bay. 
Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, 
Texas, providing a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 
feet. 
Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish 
Landing, Texas, with basin. 
Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main 
channel to vicinity of Harlingen, Texas, via Arroyo 
Colorado with basin. 
Fill a portion of shallow:draft channel adjacent to Port 
Isabel Turning Basin, construct a channel to connect 
shallow-draft channel with main channel near shoreline 
of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel 
west of this connection, all to 12-foot depth and 
bottom width of 125 feet. 
Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay 
between Aransas Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen 
tributary channel from Port Aransas to Aransas Pass, 
Texas, 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. 
Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou 
and reauthorized the 4 by 100-foot channel. 
Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between 
Port Bolivar and Galveston causeway. 
"Red Fish Landing" changed to "Port Mansfield, Texas." 
Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 
by 100 feet from main channel via Seadrift to point 
on Guadalupe River 3 miles above Victoria, Texas, 
authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. 
Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift 
with an entrance channel 9 by 100 feet. 
Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and 
Aransas Pass, Texas, to 125 feet; straighten and widen 
to 125 feet connecting channel to Conn Brown Harbor, 
and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal 
expense, all to 12 feet deep. 
Improve channels and basins comprising channel to Port 
Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government 
and in part by local interest; constructing turnout 
curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and 
bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct 
parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally 
dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance 
of small craft basin. 
PL 675, 77th Cong. 
H. Doc. 337, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 428, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 383, 77th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
S. Doc 248, 78th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 402, 77th Cong., 
1st Sess. (See PL 14, 
79th Cong.) 
H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 700, 79th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 768, 80th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 196, 81st Cong., 
1st Sess. 
PL 516, 81st Cong. 
PL 527, 82nd Cong, 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 478, 81st Cong, 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 376, 83rd Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong, 
1st Sess. 
31-31 
TABLE 31-B

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
8. Jul. 14, 1960 
Jul. 14, 1960 
(As amended 
Dec. 31, 1970) 
Jul. 14, 1960 
(As amended 
Dec. 31, 1970) 
Jul. 14, 1960 
(As amended 
Dec. 31, 1970) 
Oct. 23, 196216 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Oct. 27, 196517 
Aug. 13, 1968 
Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main 
channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port 
Isabel, Texas, an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet 
wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, 
and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep 
having a surface area of about 7 acres. 
Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 
feet and removing the submerged bars at each end of 
the island to a depth of -12 feet MLT. 
Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and 
extend southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into 
Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west 
turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts 
Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. 
Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet 
from mile 0 at Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city 
of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 feet between miles 
3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning 
basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown 
Harbor and turning basin. 
Improve main channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide 
from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel; with 
two relocations; relocate main channel in Matagorda 
Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing 
Lydia Ann Channel. 
Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two 
protective breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing 
basins; and deepen, enlarge and maintain existing 
approach channel to basin No. 2. 
Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct 
bridge at mile 29.2 turning basin at Victoria, and 
maintain turning basins at Victoria and Seadrift; 
provide: Federal construction of vertical-lift railroad 
bridge at Missouri-Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, 
mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of 
basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin 
constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Texas. 
Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a 
channel extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 
through Chocolate Bay and Chocolate Bayou to project 
channel mile 8.2, thence to a turning basin near 
channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate 
Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel 
mile 16.9). 
Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the 
mouth of Colorado River Channel protected by an 
east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth 
and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot 
contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf 
shore to Matagorda, including recreation facility, a 
turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet 
long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and 
varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a 
closure dam across the present river channel. 
Sec. 107, PL 645, 86th 
Cong. 
Sec. 107, PL 86-645 
Sec. 107, PL 86-645 
Sec. 107, PL 86-645 
H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 504, 87th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 288, 87th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 217, 89th Cong., 
1st Sees. 
S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
31-32

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
31-B 
Date 
Authorizing 
Act 
8. 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Project and Work Authorized 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 17, 1988 
Oct. 31, 1992 
Mar. 5, 1905 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Mar. 3, 1925 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 193511 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Mar. 2,1945 
Mar 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jun. 30, 1948 
Jul. 3, 1958" 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Nov. 17, 1986 
TABLE 
See 
Section 
in Test 
Modified 1968 authorization to provide that diversion 
features be constructed at Federal expense and operation 
and maintenance be shared 75 percent Federal 
and 25 percent non-Federal. 
Enlarge existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 
feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and 
width of 125 feet. 
Provide 8 miles of erosion protection for the existing 
waterway in the vicinity of Sargent, Texas. 
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX 
Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a 
pile dike.18 
A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and 
enlarge turning basin. 
A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White 
Oak Bayou.9 
Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 
4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. 
Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, 
and a 400-foot width through Galveston Bay. 
Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from 
Morgan Point to turning basin 
Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. 
Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of 
Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of 
Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. 
Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to 
Houston turning basin and dredge off-channel silting 
basins. 
Deepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including 
main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning 
points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. 
Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, 
construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 
125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallow-draft 
channel at Turkey Bend. 
Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. 
Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 
to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. 
channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou.2' 
Maintenance of Greens Bayou, Barbour Terminal Channel, 
and Bayport Ship Channel to forty-foot depths at 
Federal expense. 
31-33 
Documents 
Sec. 812, PL 99-662 
Sec. 3, PL 100-676 
Sec. 101 (20), PL 102-580 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 35, 
61st Cong., 2nd Sees. 
H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 
3rd Sess. 
H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., 
e1sSt ess. 
H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 28, 
72nd Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 58, 
74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 
e1sSt ess. 
H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 737, 79th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 
2nd Sess. i 
Sec. 107, PL 86-645 
H. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., 
1st Seas. 
Sec. 819, PL 99-662 
9.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
10. Jun. 25, 1910 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
10. Jul. 3, 1958 
Jul. 3, 1958 
11. Jul. 25, 1912 
Sep. 22, 1922 
Sep. 22, 1922 
Mar. 3, 1925 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Aug. 30, 193511 
MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX 
Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet 
bottom width. 
Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at 
mouth of Lynns Bayou. 
Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. 
Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via 
Lavaca Bay, Lavaca and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, 
a distance of 20 miles. 
A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an 
approach channel 100 feet wide and equal depth. 
Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca 
Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge; 
deepen to 12 feet Port Lavaca turning basin and 
basins at harbor of refuge. 
An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 
feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays 
to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep 
and 1,000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual 
jetties at entrance from gulf. 
SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX 
Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel 
through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port 
Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at 
Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine-Neches 
Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to 
Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. 
Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with 
increased widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine 
Pass. 
Deepen Port Arthur east and west turning basins and 
approach channel to 30 feet. Take over and deepen to 
30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with 
Taylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in 
channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in 
Sabine River near Orange. 
Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. 
Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, 
and Sabine-Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing 
places in Sabine-Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal 
and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, 
extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet 
above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin in 
Sabine Pass. 
A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont 
turning basin, including all turning basins at Port 
Arthur. 
H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 28, 
74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 37, 
75th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 314, 76th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 731, 79th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 773, 61 st Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 975, 66th Cong., 
3rd Sess. 
S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc 287, 69th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 27, 
72nd Cong., 1st Sess. 
31-34

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
11. Aug. 30, 193511 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Jun. 20, 19382 
Oct. 17, 1940 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 24, 1946' 
Jul. 24, 1946 
Jul. 24, 1946 
May 17, 1950 
Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from 
gulf to Beaumont turning basin. 
Construct suitable permanent protective works along 
Sabine Lake. Maintain Taylors Bayou turning basin. 
Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal 
wharf. 
Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island 
and abandonment of channel south and west of Harbor 
Island. 
Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont 
turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur 
west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin, 
deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning 
extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff 
from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. 
Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 
150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, 
and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. 
Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. 
Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. 
Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity 
of Pennsylvania Shipyard. 
Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine 
Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 
36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port 
Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou 
turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west 
turning basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen 
to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet Sabine-Neches Canal 
from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River 
except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches 
River channel from mouth to Beaumont turning basin 
to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to 
Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on 
Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; 
and widen Sabine-Neches Canal between Neches and 
Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. 
Improve Cow Bayou, Texas, by construction of a channel 
100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation 
channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile 
above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a 
turning basin. 
Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 
feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot 
depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge 
across bayou. 
Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine- 
Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct 
Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field 
office. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 12, 
74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Specified in Act. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 3, 
75th Cong., 1st Seas. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 20, 
75th Cong., 1st Seas. 
H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 
3rd Ses. 
S. Doc 14, 77th Cong., 
1st Ses. 
H. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 
3rd Ses. 
S. Doc 60, 77th Cong., 
1st Ses. 
S. Doc 158, 77th Cong. 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 702, 79th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., 
1st Seas. 
31-35 
TABLE 31-B

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
11. Sep. 3, 1954 
Oct. 23, 1962 
12. Mar. 4, 1913 
Jul. 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935" 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Jun. 30, 1948 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Oct. 12, 1972 
(Senate Res.) 
Oct. 12, 1972 
(House Res.) 
Rectification of certain reaches of existing Sabine Pass 
Channel, Sabine-Neches Canal, and Neches River and 
Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance 
channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at 
junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; 
relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 
34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine- 
Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth 
of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper 
end of existing project at Orange, except for channel 
around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet 
Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange 
municipal slip to upper end of project, except around 
Harbor Island; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange 
municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. 
Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland 
channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 
feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River 
Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in 
Neches River; a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in 
Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge 
at Port Arthur, Texas. Deauthorization of uncompleted 
portion of channel between Port Arthur west turning 
basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement 
of entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins. 
TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX 
A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 
28,200 feet long north to channel. 
A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a 
rubblemound dike. 
Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. 
Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. 
Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. 
Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. 
Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 
400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name 
of project to "TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS." 
Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 
16-foot Industrial Barge Canal. 
Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet 
including relocation of the basin 85 feet to the east; 
providing a 40-foot deep channel in the Industrial 
Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin 
at the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, 
and 1,000 feet wide, and easing of the bend at the 
entrance to the canal, and deauthorization of shallowdraft 
Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the 
plan of improvement above. 
S. Doc. 80, 83rd Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 
2nd Sess.' 
H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 
3rd Sess. 
H. Doc. 107, 71st Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 4, 
73rd Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 46, 
73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 62, 
74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 47, 
75th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 
2nd Sess.' 
H. Doc. 427, 86th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 199, 92nd Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
(Sec. 201, PL 89-298) 
31-36

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorising 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
12. Nov. 17, 1986 
13. Mar. 3, 1905 
Jul. 25, 1912 
Sep. 22, 1922 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Jul. 24, 1946 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Jul. 30, 1983 
16. Dec. 15, 1970 
(House Res.) 
Dec. 17, 1970 
(Senate Res.) 
Deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, 
enlarging the 6.7 mile long Texas City Channel to 50 
feet by 600 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide 
Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 
feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar 
and Galveston Entrance Channels to 52 feet; extending 
the Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52 foot 
depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an 
additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot 
contour in the Gulf of Mexico; and establishment of 
600 acres of wetland and development of wateroriented 
recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement 
of the Texas City Dike. 
TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX 
Anahuac Channel. 
Six-foot channel to Liberty. 
Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all 
improvements by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel 
from Liberty to mouth. 
Provides for a navigable channel from the Houston Ship 
Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity 
Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep 
and 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning 
basin at Liberty. 
Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 
feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship 
Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending 
along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth 
of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective 
spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in 
lieu of the 9 by 200-foot channel in Galveston and 
Trinity Bays. 
Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, 
including a navigation lock in the Wallisville Dam at 
Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel 
to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) 
to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel 
Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project 
Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River projects. 
Reevaluation of navigation benefits. 
Modified Wallisville Reservoir by reducing the size to 
5,600 acres and confining the reservoir to east side of 
Trinity River. 
CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION 
PROJECT) 
Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of 
beach. 
Sec. 201, PL 99-662 
H. Doc. 989, 66th Cong., 
3rd Sess. 
H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
PL 98-63 
H. Doc. 415, 91st Cong., 
2nd Sess. 
(Sec. 201, PL 89-298) 
31-37

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
17. Jun. 20, 1938 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Nov. 28, 1990 
20. Aug. 13, 1968 
Nov. 17, 1986 
21. Nov. 17, 1988 
22. Nov. 17, 1988 
24. Nov. 17, 1986 
25. Oct. 23, 1962 
26. Nov. 17. 1986 
BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX 
Barker and Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. 
Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo, 
Brays, and White Oak Bayous. 
Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 
2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. 
Flood damage reduction improvements and recreational 
development for the Houston, Texas urban area, divided 
into six separable elements - Brays, Greens, Hunting, 
Halls, Carpenters and Little White Oak Bayous. Flood 
control improvements consist of 75.3 miles of stream 
enlargement, 14 miles of stream clearing, 7 flood detention 
basins, 7 miles of diversion channels and environmental 
revegetation. Recreation features consist of 14.7 miles of 
trails, 502 picnic facilities, 12 group pavilions, 2 boat 
launching ramps, 10 restrooms, play-grounds, exercise 
stations and parking facilities. 
CLEAR CREEK, TX 
Channel enlargement and rectification from upper end of 
Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 34.8.0 
Modified local cooperation requirements of the 1968 
authorization. 
CYPRESS CREEK, TX 
Enlargement and rectification of lower 29.4 miles of Cypress 
Creek channel and recreational development. 
FALFURRIAS, TX 
Construction of a 5.6-mile long diversion levee west of 
Falfurrias; a 1.8-mile long pilot channel west of Falfurrias; 
a flowage easement;" and a 0.8-mile long ring levee 
around the sewage treatment plant. 
LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX 
Channel improvements to provide drainage protection for 
the area in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. 
Highway 83, and for the area between U.S. Highway 83 
and the Rio Grande in Hidalgo County; and to provide 
flood protection for the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, 
Raymondville, Edcouch, La Villa, and Lyford. 
PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANEFLOOD 
PROTECTION) 
Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing seawall; 
constructing 0.3 mile of new seawall, 20.3 miles new 
levees and five pumping plants; and raising and improving 
7.5 miles of existing levees.? 
SIMS BAYOU, TX 
Enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control 
measures of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou; environmental 
measures and riparian habitat along entire alignment, 
and recreational development. 
H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2nd 
Sess. 
H. Doc. 250, 83rd Cong., 2nd 
Sess. 
1 
H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., 1st 
Sess. 
Sec. 101, PL 101-640 
H. Doc. 351, 90th Cong., 2nd 
Sess. 
Sec. 1001, PL 99-662 
Sec. 3, PL 100-676 
Sec. 3, PL 100-676 
Sec. 401, PL 99-662 
H. Doc. 505, 87th Cong., 2nd 
Sess.
1 
Sec. 401, PL 99-662 
31-38

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
31-B 
Date 
Authorizing 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
in Text Act--- Project and Work Authorized Documents 
26. Sep. 29, 1989 Amended the Water Resources and Development Act (WRDA) Sec. 103, PL 101-101 
of 1986 authorization as project cost estimate had exceeded 
limit established in Section 902 of WRDA 1986. 
TAYLORS BAYOU, TX 
28. Oct. 27, 1965 Enlarging and rectifying channels; construction of diversion H. Doc. 206, 89th Cong., 1st 
channel; a salt water gate; enlargement of GIWW 1.3 Sess. 
miles and alteration of State Highway 87 bridge. 9 
1 Contains latest published maps. 
2 Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south 
jetty 1,265 feet considered inactive. 
SDredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of 
inner basin deauthorized. 
SIncluded in Public Works Administration program 
September 6, 1933 and February 16, 1935. 
6 West leg of Wye junction with main channel 
deauthorized. 
6 Construction of lock in diversion dam at local 
expense considered inactive. 
' Dredging upper .5 mile of channel to vicinity'of 
Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of 
PL 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program 
September 6, 1933. 
8 Dredging 43rd to 51st Streets was deauthorized 
under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 
9 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 
1o Deepening 43rd to 57th Streets was deauthorized 
under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 
11 Previously authorized September 6, 1933 by Public 
Works Administration. 
12 H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. and project 
documents contain latest published maps. 
13 Dredging upper 3.5 miles was deauthorized under 
Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 
14 Dredging upper 5 miles was deauthorized under 
Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 
15 Inactive. 
16 Portion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine 
River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. Relocation of 
channel in Matagorda Bay deauthorized under Sec. 12 of 
PL 93-251. 
17 The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to 
Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 
1001 of PL 99-662. 
18 Construction of pile dike was deauthorized under 
Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 
19 Hill Street Bridge to mouth of White Oak Bayou 
was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 
20 Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern 
Pacific Slip to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec. 
12 of PL 93-251. 
21 The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 
deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 22 Complete widening of channel between Port 
Arthur west turni basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin 
deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 
23 Complete deepening of channel between Port 
Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin 
deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 
24 Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin 
near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 
93-251. 
25 Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port 
Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 
26 The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange 
to Echo, Texas deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 
2 Jetty extension was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 
of PL 99-662. 
* Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding 
Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir is inactive. 
29 Enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 
7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of 
Mayhaw Bayou are inactive. 
30 Portion of project upstream of Brazoria/Galveston 
County line, approximately mile 18.5, in inactive category. 
31 Turning basin was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 
of PL 99-662. 
31-39 
TABLE 
See 
Section

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 31-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1995 
Report See 
Annual Report Operation and 
Project For Construction Maintenance 
Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and Harbor 
Acts)6 1967 38,252 - 
Bastrop Bayou, TX2 1931 9,920 27,129 
Brazos River, TX, Velasco to Old Washington3 1924 216,989' 223,010 
Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX 1982 66,934 537,139 
Corpus ChrCishtri,i sTTtXXi,, ,C hannel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal 
Peninsula 1968 1,194,344 26,467 
Dickinson Bayou, TX 1954 33,942 57,553 
Double Bayou, TX 1987 226,558 1,412,078 
East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX5 1922 2,476 847 
Greens Bayou Bridges, TX 1993 450,000 - 
Johnson Bayou, LA 1933 2,261 54,042 
Little Bay, TX7 1979 - 252,728 
Neches River and Trib., Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, 
TX (Advance Engineering & Design) 1984 1,503,843 - 
Oyster Creek, TX 1922 6,942 7,556 
Sabine River and Tributaries, TX (Echo to Morgan Bluff)3 1971 - - 
1 Excludes $1,672 work contribution. ' Aransas County Navigation District, Rockrt, TX, 
2ff aconstructed project as authorized by 1950 River and Harbor 
2Widening from 60 feet to 100 feet at 4-foot depth Act (H. Doc. 114, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.) i 1955 under 
was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 
eauthorized under Seco1. fD Aeprmartym penetr mit. 
3 Deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 8 In addition, $102,325 expended from contributed 
# Includes $123,676 for previous projects. funds. 
6 In inactive category for maintenance. 
6 Channel adequate for existing commerce. 
TABLE 31-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1995 
Report See 
Annual Report Operation and 
Project For Construction Maintenance 
Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, Texas 1986 201,300 - 
Baytown, Texas' 1980 245,400 - 
Colorado River, Matagorda, Texas2 1963 273,757 - 
Freeport and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection2 1984 29,285,0423 - 
Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Texas2 1978 505,749 - 
Highland Bayou, Texas2 1984 12,254,390 - 
Kirbyville, Texas2 1993 1,484,613 - 
Lavaca-Navidad River, Texas: 
Hallettsville Project 1961 256,043 - 
General channel project 1952 21,086 - 
Liberty Local Protection Project, Texas6 1971 98,517 - 
Mill Creek, Texas' 1952 24,753 - 
Peyton Creek, Texas4 1975 66,377 - 
San Diego Creek, Alice, Texas 2 1963 135,175 - 
Texas City and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection2 1993 38,882,400 - 
Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Texas2 1956 130,239 - 
Three Rivers, Texas5 
6 5,835,927 - 
Upper White Oak Bayou, Texas 1989 972,300 - 
U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, Louisianna' 1993 500,00(P - 
Vince and Little Vince Bayous, Texas2 1993 19,307,100 - 
1 Inactive. 
2 Completed. 
a In addition, $8,695,438 expended from contributed 
funds, $1,126,905 estimated value of contributed lands, and 
$2,726,446 for relocations by local interests. 
4 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 
b See Annual Report for 1983, Fort Worth District, 
page 16-12. 
6 Deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 
7In addition, $1,484,613 expended from contributed 
funds, estimated value of $200,096 for contributed lands, and 
S$202, 456 for relocations by local interests. 
8 In addition, $14,396,307 expended from contributed 
funds, estimated value of $1,224,219 for contributed lands, 
and contributed work in the amount of $1,070,806 by local 
interests. Work performed at 100% Local Sponsor expense 
was in the amount of $320,347. 
y In addition, $237,792 expended from contributed 
31-40

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
TABLE 31-E TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
in Test Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Sep. 30, 1995 
2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 
3. Cedar Bayou, TX 
4. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 
5. Crpus Christi Ship 
Channel, TX 
6. Freeport Harbor, TX 
7. Galveston Harbor and 
Channel, TX 
8. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 
between Apalachee Bay, FL 
and the Mexican Border 
9. Houston Ship Channel, TX 
11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 
Regular 23,765,859 
Public Works 2,848,560 
Contributed 10,187,188 
Total cost of project 36,801,607 
Regular 642,176 
Contributed 0 
Total cost of project 642,176 
Regular 85,214 
Total cost of project 85,214 
Regular 75,307,222 
Public Works 324,287 
Contributed 5,993,265 
Total 81,625,542 
Value of useful work 
performed 1,716,695 
Contributed land 276,720 
Total cost of project 83,618,957 
Regular 57,208,092 
Public Works 116,575 
Contributed 19,355,952 
Total 76,676,050 
Value of useful work 
performed 360,249 
Total cost of project 77,036,299 
Regular 
Channel 11,920,187 
Seawall 8,754,209 
Public Works 0 
Contributed 3,648,932 
Total cost of project 24,323,328 
Regular 87,455,967 
Public Works 466,477 
Inland WW. Trust Fund 5,728,025 
Contributed 4,443,085 
Total 98,093,554 
Value of useful work 
performed 395,000 
Contributed land 139,776 
Total cost of project 98,628,330 
Regular 29,042,293 
Public Works 2,612,932 
Contributed 1,382,760 
Total cost of project 33,037,985 
Regular 49,592,331 
Public Works 1,363,652 
Contributed 2,103,435 
Total 53,059,418 
Value of useful work 
performed 32,000 
Contributed land 116,760 
Total cost of project 53,208,178 
31-41 
51,901,595
0 
1,352,092 
53,253,687 
2,764,924
0 
2764,924 
1,184,960 
1,184,960 
111,193,047
0 
985,345 
112,178,392
0
0 
112,178,392 
60,928,182
0 
229,311 
61,157,493
0 
61,157,493 
102,354,519 
512,163 
13,121 
2,322,583 
105,202,386 
363,128,996
0
0 
978,246 
364,107,242
00 
364,107,242 
156,272,714
0 
334,641 
156,607,355 
187,717,311
0 
4,490,297 
192,207,608
0
0 
192,207,608 
2,170,080
0
0 
2,170,080
0
0
0
0
0 
3,576,684
0
0 
3,576,684
0
0 
3,576,684 
8,935
0
0 
8,935
0 
8,935 
7,373,356 
595,973
0
0 
7,969,329 
1,896,959
0 
1,365,605
0 
3,262,564
0
0 
3,262,564
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 
77,837,534 
2,848,560 
11,539,280 
92,225,374 
3,407,100
0 
3,407,100 
1,270,174 
1,270,174 
190,076,953 
324,287 
6,978,610 
197,380,618 
1,716,695 
276,720 
199,374,033 
118,145,209 
116,575 
19,585,263 
137,842,478 
360,249 
138,202,727 
121,648,062 
9,862,345 
13,121 
5,971,515 
137,495,043 
452,481,922 
466,477 
7,093,630 
5,421,331 
465,463,360 
395,000 
139,776 
465,998,136 
185,315,007 
2,612,932 
1,717,401 
189,645,340 
237,309,642 
1,363,652 
6,593,732 
245,267,026 
32,000 
116,760 
245,415,786

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 31-E 
See 
Section 
in Text Project 
TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS 
Funds 
12. Texas City Channel, TX 
13. Trinity River and 
Tributaries, TX 
Regular 
Public Works 
Contributed 
Total cost of project 
Regular 
Contributed 
Total cost of project 
Total Cost 
to 
New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Sep. 30, 1995 
14,628,853 
136,296 
1,023,819 
15,788,968 
38,810,474 
66,000 
38,876,474 
27,339,155
0
0 
27,339,155 
18,717,149
0 
18,717,149 
726,158
0
0 
726,158 
42,694,166 
136,296 
1,023,819 
43,854,281 
57,527,623 
66,000 
57,593,623 
31-42 
TOA OTO XITN R-ET

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS 
Adopted Project 
Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions 
Dethin Deptin 
See (Below (Below Bottom 
Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length 
in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 
2. Brazos Island Outer Bar and Jetty Channel 44-42 400 38-36 300 2.5 
Padre Island to Long Island 
Long Island to Goose Island 
Goose Island to Turning 
Basin Extension 
Turning Basin Extension 
Brownsville Turning Basin 
Port Isabel Channel via East 
Turnout 
West Wye, from Brownsville 
Channel 
Port Isabel Turning Basin 
Fishing Boat Harbor: 
West Basin 
Middle Basin 
East Basin 
Connecting Channel 
Entrance Channel 
42 250 
42 250 
42 300 
42 400 
36 1,200 
36 200 
36 200 
36 200-1,000 
15 370-305 
15 370-305 
15 370 
15 270 
15 100 
36 
36 
36 
36 
36 
36 
250 
250 
300 
400 
660-1,200 
200 
36 200 
36 200-1,000 
15 370-305 
15 370-305 
15 370 
15 265 
15 100 
2.1 
9.6 
3.2 
1.3 
2,670 0.5 
1,300 
1,470 
1,200 
1,470 
1,230 
770 
1.4 
0.8 
0.2 
0.3 
0.2 
0.3 
0.2 
0.1 
4. Channel to Port Bolivar Channel 
Port Bolivar Turning Basin 
5. Corpus Christi Aransas Pass Outer Bar 
Ship Channel, Channel 
TX Aransas Pass Jetty Channel 
Inner Basin at Harbor Island 
Channel to Port Aransas 
Port Aransas Turning Basin 
Anchorage Basin at Port 
Aransas 
Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 
Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta 
Junction 
LaQuinta Junction to Corpus 
Christi Turning Basin 
Corpus Christi Turning Basin 
Industrial Canal 
Avery Point Turning Basin 
Channel to Chemical 
Turning Basin 
Chemical Turning Basin 
Tule Lake Channel 
Tule Lake Turning Basin 
Viola Channel 
Viola Turning Basin 
Channel to LaQuinta 
LaQuinta Turning Basin 
Turning Point at LaQuinta 
Channel Junction 
Jewel Fulton Canal 
Jewel Fulton Turning Basin 
Mooring Area at Ingleside: 
Mooring Area (a) 
Mooring Area (b) 
6. Freeport Outer Bar Channel 
Harbor, TX Jetty Channel 
Quintana Turning Basin 
Channel to Brazosport 
Turning Basin 
Brazosport Turning Basin 
Channel to Upper Turning 
Basin 
TABLE 31-F 
Harbor, TX 
900 0.2 
30 
30 
47 
45 
45 
12 
12 
12 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
12 
12 
45 
45 
47 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
200 
7501 
700 
600-730 
730-1,720 
100-150 
200-4002 
300-400 
600-500 
500 
400 
800 
400 
975 
400 
1,200 
300 
1,200 
300-350 
1,200 
300-400 
1,200 
1,2503 
100 
200 
150 
150 
400 
400 
750' 
400 
1,000 
285-375 
30 
14 
47 
45 
45 
12 
12 
12 
45 
45 
40-45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
40 
40 
40 
40 
45 
45 
45 
12 
12 
45 
38 
36 
36 
36 
36 
1,550 
200 
900 
5,423 
1,150 
1,690 
1,000 
1,000 
800 
1,250 
400 
200 
200 
700 
600 
Irregular 
100 
2002 
300-400 
600-500 
500 
400 
1,000 
400 
1,000 
350 
1,0505 
200 
900 
200-250 
700-900 
300-400 
1,200 
1,2503 
100 
200 
150 
300 
200 
390 
1000 
285-375 
1.8 
1.0 
0.1 
0.2 
8.5 
3.6 
8.6 
1.0 
1.1 
0.2 
0.6 
0.3 
3.1 
0.2 
1.8 
0.2 
5.6 
0.1 
0.2 
0.8 
0.1 
0.8 
3.0 
0.8 
31-43 
- 1.2 
667 0.1 
- 1.4

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 31-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS 
Adopted Project 
Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions 
Det in Deet i n 
See (Below (Below Bottom 
Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length 
in Text Project 
7. Galveston 
Harbor and 
Channel, TX 
9. Houston Ship 
Channel, TX 
10. Matagorda Ship 
Channel, TX 
11. Sabine-Neches 
Waterway, TX 
6. 
Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 
(Continued) 
i
i 
Section of Waterway 
Brazos Harbor Turning 
Basin 
Entrance Channel 
Outer Bar Channel 
Inner Bar Channel 
Anchorage Basin 
Bolivar Roads Channel 
Bolivar Roads Channel to 
43rd St. 
Bolivar Roads to Morgan 
Point 
Morgan Point to Boggy 
Bayou 
Boggy Bayou to Greens 
Bayou 
Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou 
Hunting Bayou Turning 
Point 
Clinton Isuland Turning 
Basin 
Sims Bayou to Southern 
Pacific Slip 
Southern Pacific Slip to 
LHouston Turning Basin 
Houston Turning Basin 
Upper Turning Basin 
Brady Island Channel 
Barbour Terminal Channel 
Turning Basin 
Bayport Ship Channel 
Turning Basin 
Anchorage Area 
Five-Mile Cut Channel 
Light-Draft Channel: 
Upper Turning Basin to 
Jensen Drive 
Turkey Bend Channel 
Greens Bayou Channel: 
Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 
Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 
Outer Bar and Jetty Channel 
Channel to Point Comfort 
Approach Channel to 
Turning Basin 
Turning Basin 
Channel to Port Lavaca 
Lynn Bayou Turning Basin 
Channel to I lar or of Refuge 
North-South Basin 
East-West llBasin 
Channel to Red Bluff 
Sahine Hank Channel 
Salhine Paiss Outer liar 
Channel 
Sahine Pass Jetty Channel 
Sahine I 'ass Anchorage 
lIlasin 
Sahine l'ass (;hannel 
Port Arthur Canal 
Entrance to I Port Arthur 
Turning Busins 
I'ort Arthur East Turning 
lHusin 
36 
52 
52 
50 
36 
50 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
36 
36 
36 
10 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40
8 
10 
10 
40 
15 
38 
36 
36 
36 
12 
12 
12 
12 
12 
6 
42 
42 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
675 0.1 
- 4.7 
- 1.7 
- 3.2 
- 1.81 
- 1.0 
- 3.9 
- 26.2 
- 12.8 
- 2.4 
- 5.3 
1,375 - 
1,592 - 
- 0.6 
- 2.9 
3,100 0.6 
1,000 0.2 
- 0.9 
- 3.1 
2,000 0.4 
- 3.8 
1,000 0.3 
- 1.9 
750' 
800 
800 
800 
2,875' 
800 
1,125 
400 
400 
300 
300 
900-1 , 0 
800* 
3(X) 
3(X) 
400-1,0(X) 
150 
60 
300 
2,000 
300 
1,600 
150 
125 
60 
60 
175 
100 
300 
,300-200' 
200-300 
1,000 
125 
27-340 
125 
3(X) 
250 
1(X) 
8(X) 
8(X) 
800X)-5(X) 
1,5(X) 
5(X) 
5(X) 
275-678 
420) 
30 
42 
42 
40 
36 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
36 
36 
36 
10 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
8 
10 
10 
40 
15 
38 
36 
36 
36 
12 
12 
12 
12 
12 
6 
42 
42 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
3,000 - 
- 5.6 
- 6.2 
- 0.3 
1,765 0.3 
11 
300-2 
200-3 
1,0
1 
27-3
132 
1
8
8 
800-5 
1,5 
55 
275-6 
370-5 
31-44 
60 - 4.1 
60 - 0.8 
175 - 0.3 
100 - 1.3 
300 - 3.2 
2006 - 20.9 
300 - 1.1 
)00 1,000 0.2 
25 - 4.1 
340 532 0.1 
125 - 1.9 
300 1,682 0.3 
Z50 1,750 0.3 
00 - 20.2 
100 - 14.7 
(X) - 3.4 
;(X) - 4.1 
$00 
)0oo0) 
(X) 
78 
47 
750' 
800 
800 
800 
2,875 
800 
1,125 
400 
400 
300 
300 
948-1,0001 
965-1,0701 
300 
300 
400-1,000 
150 
60 
300 
2,000 
300 
1,600 
150 
125

GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
TABLE 31-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS 
Adopted Project 
Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions 
De t in Depet in 
Feetm Feet 
See (Below (Below Bottom 
Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length 
in Text Project Section ci Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 
11. (Continued) Port Arthur West Turning 
Basin 40 600 40 350-550 1,610 0.3 
Channel connecting Port 
Arthur West and Taylors 
Bayou Turning Basins 40 200-250 40 200-250 - 0.6 
Taylors Bayou Turning Basin 40 150-1,000 40 90-1,233 3,470 0.7 
Sabine-Neches Canal, Port 
Arthur Canal to Neches 
River 40 400 40 400 - 11.2 
Turning Point at Mile 19.5 40 900' 40 900' - 8 
Neches River, Mouth to 
Maneuvering Area Beaumont 
Turning Basin 40 400 40 400 - 18.3 
Turning Point, Mile 31.1 40 1,000' 40 1,000 700 8 
Turning Point, Mile 36.6 40 1,000' 40 1,000 930 8 
Turning Point, Mile 40.3 40 1,000' 40 1,300 1,530 8 
Channel Extension, Mile 
40.3 36 350 36 350 1,265 0.2 
Maneuvering Area at 
Beaumont Turning Basin 40 Irregular 40 Irregular 1,300 0.2 
Beaumont Turning Basin 34 500 34 160-535 1,500 0.3 
Beaumont Turning Basin 
Extension 34 350 34 300 - 0.4 
Beaumont Turning Basin 
Extension to End of Project 
Channel Vicinity 
Bethlehem Steel Company 30 200 30 200 - 0.7 
Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches 
River to Sabine River 30 200 30 200 - 4.4 
Sabine River Channel, Mouth 
to Foot of Green Ave. 30 200 30 200 - 9.5 
Orange Turning Basin 30 Irregular 30 Irregular 1,550 0.3 
Orange Municipal Slip 30 200 30 150-200 2,435 0.5 
Old Channel Around Harbor 
Island 25 150-200 25 150-200 - 2.4 
Channel to Echo7 12 125 - - - - 
Adams Bayou 12 100 12 100 - 1.7 
Cow Bayou 13 100 13 100 - 7.0 
Orangefield Turning Basin 13 300 13 300 500 0.1 
1 Average. 
4 Includes 100-foot channel width. 
s Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. 
' Diameter. 
' Includes 350-foot channel width. 
s 300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. 
' Deauthorized. 
8 Included in channel length. 
� Includes 300-foot channel width. 
31-45

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY 
APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER 
EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED 
TABLE 31-G FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS 
Adopted Project 
Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions 
Depth in Depth in 
Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below 
Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Length 
Tributary Channel 
Offats Bayou 
Main Channel 
West Wye 
Chocolate Bayou Channel 
12-Foot Channel via 
East Turnout 
West Turnout 
9-Foot Channel 
Turning Basin 
San Bernard River Channel 
Colorado River Channel 
Turning Basin 
Silting Basin 
Mouth of Colorado River 
Navigation Channel, GIWW to Gulf 
Turning Basin at Matagorda 
Channel to Palacios 
Turning Basin No. 1 
Turning Basin No. 2 
Connecting Channel 
Channel to Barroom Bay 
Channel to Victoria Main Channel via 
East Turnout 
Turning Basin 
West Turnout Channel 
Channel to Seadrift via South Turnout 
Turning Basin 
North Turnout Channel 
Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift Channel 
Basin 
Channel to Rockport 
Turning Basin 
Channel to Aransas Pass 
Turning Basin 
Channel to Conn Brown Harbor 
Conn Brown Harbor 
Channel to Port Mansfield 
Entrance Channel 
Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge 
Turning Basin 
Hopper Dredge Turning Basin 
Channel Across Padre Island and 
Laguna Madre 
Turnout Channels, East Side of Main 
Channel, GIWW 
North Turnout 
South Turnout 
Channel West Side of Main Channel, 
GIWW, to P.T. of Turnout Channels 
Turnout Channels, West Side of Main 
Channel, GIWW 
North Turnout 
South Turnout 
Channel from P.T. of Turnout Channels to 
Approach 
Channel to Main Turning lIasin 
Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin 
Main Turning Basin 
Turning Basin Extension 
Small Craft Basin 
Shrimp I Hlsin 
Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Feet) Feet Miles 
12 
12 
2 12 
S 12 
S 9
9 
s 9 
6 9
99 
7 
15-12 
12 
$ 12 
12 
12 
12 
y 12 
12 
12
9
99
999 
9
9 
14 
14 
14 
14 
x 
16 
16 
16 
14 
12 
12 
14 
12 
12 
14 
14 
14 
14
8 
12 
125 
125 
125 
125 
100 
600 
100 
100 
400 
150 
200-100 
350 
125 
200 
300 
150-480 
60 
100 
6 0 0 AVG) 
100 
100 
250 
100 
100 
200 
200 
475 
175 
300 
125 
300 
250 
100 
300 
100 
100 
100 
200 
200 
1.25 
2(O) 
400 
1,0(X) 
16() 
35O 
125 - 
125 2,200 
125 
125 
100 
100 
400 
150 
125 
200 
300 
130-400 
12 
12 
12 
12
99
99 
12 
12 
12 
12
9
99999 
99 
14 
14 
14 
14 
16 
16 
16 
14 
12 
12 
14 
12 
12 
14 
14 
14 
14 
12 
12 
2.3 
0.4 
8.2 
0.8 
26.0 
15.5 
0.1 
1.0 
16.1 
0.1 
0.2 
0.1 
500 
635 
1,130
- 34.8 
800Svo(VG) 
230 
1,225 
2,212 
125 
1,800 
0.1 
0.8 
2.0 
0.5 
2.1 
0.2 
6.1 
0.4 
0.3 
- 0.8 
- 0.4 
300 0.1 
- 7.7 
- 0.6 
- 0.6 
- 0.6 
- 0.6 
- 0.6 
1,250 
580 
860 
1,450 
0.6 
0.3 
0.2 
0.1 
0.2 
0.3 
100 
500vG) 
100 
100 
200 
100 
200 
3 42 svo) 
125-175 
300 
0.2 
300 
250 
100 
300 
100 
100 
100 
100 
2(X) 
2(X) 
125 
2(X) 
4(X) 
1,0(XX) 
160) 
35() 
31-46

GALVESTON, TEXAS. DISTRICT 
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY 
APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER 
EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED 
TABLE 31-G FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS 
Adopted Project 
Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions 
Depth in Depth in 
Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below 
Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Length 
Tributary Channel Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Feet) Feet Miles 
Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout 
from Main Channel, GIWW 12 125 12 12511 - 25.8 2 
Turning Basin near Rio Hondo 12 400 12 400 500 0.1 
North Turnout from Main Channel 12 200 12 200 - 0.7 
Port Isabel Side Channels 
Main Channel 12 125 12 125-90 - 0.6 
Main Channel 12 233-60 12 233-60 - 0.4 
South Leg 12 125 12 125 - 0.2 
Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor 
Entrance Channel 7 75 7 75 - 1.4 
Harbor Channel 6 50 6 50 - 0.3 
Boat Basin 6 Variable 6 72-501 1,308 0.2 
1 Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at 
Mile 16.9.
2 Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local 
interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. 
a Constructed by local interests. 
' Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 was 
deauthorized. 
b Authorized to Mile 31 above mouth (channmel mile 
29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Section 12 of PL 
93-251. 
6 Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, 
to the gulf which was dredged by local interests in 1939. 
(Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of improvements 
authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) 
' Authorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a 
dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot wide by 
20 to 23-feet deep discharge channel into Matagorda Bay, and a 
15-foot by 200-foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties 
from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East jetty to be 
3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long. 
8 Includes two protective breakwaters at entrance to 
turning basins. 
9 In the inactive category for maintenance. 
a Also provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance 
about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 feet long 
and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) 
n South turnout is 200 feet wide. 
2 Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to Mile 31 was 
deauthorized. 
31-47

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 31-H DREDGING OPERATIONS 

 

Brazos Island Harbor, TX 
(New Work) 

Dredging Inshore Reach No. 3, Station 46+000 to 89+500 

October 1, 1994 to April 21, 1995

2,910,973

$2,904,874

Brazos Island Harbor, TX 
(Maintenance) 

Dredging Entrance Channel 
Sta. -13+000 to Sta 0+000 

January 24, 1995 to February 26, 1995

755,301

$1,579,278

Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 
(Maintenance) 

Dredging Beacon 82 through Tule Lake Turning Basin 

October 1, 1994 to November 10, 1994

1,034,883

$1,235,514


Dredging Entrance Channel with U.S. Hopper Dredge Wheeler 

August 9, 1995 to September 18, 1995

724,339

$2,575,866

Dredging LaQuinta Junction to Beacon 82


September 15, 1995 to  November 10, 1995

241,464

$375,000 

Freeport Harbor, TX 
(Maintenance) 

Dredging Entrance Channel

 October 1, 1994 to November 27, 1994 

841,232

$1,308,405

Dredging Inside Channels, 
Turning Basins and Coast 
Guard Channel and Basins 

September 1, 1995 to September 30, 1995

357,452

$772,120


Dredging Entrance Channel

September 26, 1995 to September 30, 1995 

130,222

$300,000
 
Galveston Harbor and 
Channel, TX 
(Maintenance) 

Dredging Entrance Channel 
with U.S. Hopper Dredge Wheeler 

January 5, 1995 to February 3, 1995 

971,797

$1,866,739


Dredging Entrance Channel 
with U.S. Hlopper Dredge McFarland 

July 30, 1995 to September 21, 1995 

261,221

$2,600,000

Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, 
TX (Maintenance) 

  
Dredging High Island to 
Port Bolivar 

January 2, 1995 to September 30, 1995

1,228,954

43,477,162 

Dredging Port Isabel to 
Arroyo Colorado 

October 1, 1994 to November 19, 1994 

708,208

$569,521

Dredging Channel to Harlingen 

October 1, 1994 to November 19, 1994 

323,187

$320,700


Dredging Tributary Channel 
to Aransas Pass & Aransas Pass 


October 12, 1994 to January 11, 1995

604,506

$1,246,363 

Dredging Colorado River 
to Matagorda Bay 

November 27, 1994 to February 14, 1995 

1,778,562

$1,435,494

Dredging Corpus. Christi Bay 
to Mud Flats 

November 16, 1994 to March 4, 1995 

1,448,401

$1,416,977

Dredging Arroyo Colorado 
to Mud Flats 

January 17, 1995 to April 22, 1995 

3,005,680

$2,015,766

Dredging Channel to Harlingen 
and Turning Basin  

Janu;ary 17, 1995 to  April 22, 1995 

173,950

$268,122

Dredging Channel to Palacios 

April 20, 1995 to June 18, 1995 

1,977,512

$780,954


Dredging Turnstake Island to Live Oak Point

May 8, 1995 to July 18, 1995  

1,763,711

$1,063,763




GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 
TABLE 31-H DREDGING OPERATIONS 
See Cubic 
Section Yards of 
in Text Project Description Period Materials Cost 



Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX
(Maintenance)   


Dredging Main Channel across Aransas Bay

June 14, 1995 to August 28, 1995

918,005

$476,204

Dredging Main Channel 
to Matagorda Bay 

July 24, 1995 to August 8, 1995

105,087

$179,341

Dredging Navigation Channel 
and Impoundment Basin 
at Mouth of Colorado River

December 18, 1994 to February 10, 1995

496,459

$1,212,564

 Houston Ship Channel, TX 
(Maintenance) 

Dredging Houston Ship 
Channel 

March 7, 1995 to June 4, 1995

265,141

$259,930

Dredging Redfish Reef to 
Morgan Point 

October 1, 1994 to March 12, 1995

3,774,510

$3,264,970

Dredging Barbour .Terminal 
Channel 

November 8, 1994 to December 14, 1995

767,270

$903,471

Emergency Dredging Morgan 
Point to Carpenter Bayou 

December 29, 1994 to May 11, 1995

1,309,900

$1,917,796

Dredging Sims Bayou to 
Turning Basin 

October 24, 1994 to July 12, 1995

1,139,461

$2,131,776

Dredging Bayport Ship 
Channel 


March 7, 1995 to June 4, 1995

1,244,528

$1,212,051


Dredging Greens Bayou 
Channel 

October 24, 1994 to July 12, 1995

243,722

$531,444

Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 
(Maintenance) 

Dredging Port Arthur Turning 
Basin, Junction Area, and 
Port Arthur Canal 

October 1, 1994 to October 15, 1994

127,750

$48,610


Dredging Middle and Upper 
Reaches Neches River Channel 

October 1, 1994 to November 18, 1994

761,036

$1024,471


Dredging Sabine Pass Outer 
Bar Channel 

October 1, 1994 to October 30, 1994

1,015,219

$891,130

Trinity River and 
Tributaries, TX 
(Maintenance) 

Dredging Anahuac Channel and 
Channel to Liberty 

October 1, 1994 to October 24, 1994

426,296

$1,080,764





1 In addition $1,427,888 expended from contributed funds. 
2 In addition $21,234 expended from contributed funds. 
sIn addition $11,278 expended from contributed funds. 
4 In addition $125,000 expended from contributed funds. 
5 In addition $208,450 expended from contributed funds. 
31-49

ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* 
The district comprises the watershed of the Canadian River 
and its tributaries in New Mexico; the watershed of Arkansas 
River and its tributaries in Colorado; the watershed of Rio 
Grande and its tributaries including the Pecos River and its 
tributaries upstream of Amistad Lake; and the San Juan River 
Basin in New Mexico; and the watersheds of the Gila, San 
Francisco and Mimbres Rivers and its tributaries in New 
Mexico. 
Note: The district watershed boundaries were revised in June 
1986 to include the portion of New Mexico west of the 
Continental Divide. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Flood Control 
1. Acequias Irrigation System, NM ......... 
2. Alamogordo, NM .................. 
3. Alamosa, CO .................... 
4. Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM ..... 
5. Conchas Lake, NM .................. 
6. El Paso, TX ..................... 
7. John Martin Reservoir, CO ............. 
8. Rio Grande Basin, NM................ 
8A. Abiquiu Dam, NM ................. 
8B. Cochiti Lake, NM.................. 
8C. Galisteo Dam, NM ................. 
8D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM .............. 
8E. Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, 
Bernalillo to Belen, NM.............. 
8F. Rio Grande Floodway, NM ............ 
80. San Acacia to Bosque del Apache Unit, NM.. 
9. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM......... 
Page 
32-1 
32-2 
32-2 
32-2 
32-3 
32-3 
32-4 
32-4 
32-4 
32-5 
32-5 
32-6 
32-6 
32-6 
32-7 
32-7 
Flood Control (Continued) 
10. Trinidad Lake, CO .................. 
11. Two Rivers Dam, NM................. 
12. Inspection of completed flood 
control projects ..................... 
13. Scheduling flood control 
reservoir operations ................. 
14. Other authorized flood 
control projects.................... 
15. Flood control work under 
special authorizations ................ 
General Investigations 
16. Surveys ......................... 
17. Collection and study of basic data ......... 
18. Environmental Data Studies ............ 
19. Continuation of Planning and Engineering .... 
20. Advance Engineering and Design ......... 
Flood Control 
1. ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM 
Location. There are about one thousand acequias throughout 
the state of New Mexico, most of which are located in northcentral 
New Mexico. 
Proposed project. Authorized by the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986, Section 1113, the project consists of 
about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New 
Mexico. These community ditch systems provide irrigation 
water to about 160,000 acres on an estimated 12,000 farms. 
Acequias have been in existence since the early Spanish 
Colonization period of the 17th and 18th Centuries and represent 
one of the oldest forms of cooperative institutions in the United 
States. They are an integral part of the culture and heritage of 
New Mexico. Diversion structures, many of which are 
constructed of available materials such as rock and brush, are 
frequently destroyed by flows greater than normal resulting from 
spring runoff or summer thunderstorms. Disruption of the 
*All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 
32-1 
Page 
32-8 
32-8 
32-9 
32-9 
32-10 
32-10 
32-10 
32-10 
32-11 
32-11 
32-11

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
ditches usually occurs during peak irrigation season and 
severely impacts crop production. The Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 directs the U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers to undertake measures, without regard to economic 
analysis, as are necessary to protect and restore the river 
diversion structures and associated canals. 
Local Cooperation. The local sponsor, the State of New 
Mexico, has a law whereby the State of New Mexico provides 
17.5% of the project costs, and low interest loans to the local 
Acequias for the remaining 7.5%. The State of New Mexico 
has appropriated, and will appropriate on an annual basis, the 
funds necessary to meet the requirements of local sponsorship. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate 
construction were received in Fiscal Year 1988. Construction 
contracts have been awarded in every year since FY 1988. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated 
and completed on structures for three projects in FY 1995: 
Agua Caliente and Llano La Presa at San Jose, NM, Del Llano 
at Dixon, NM and Canada Ancha at Chimayo, NM. 
Proposed Project. The project consists of a levee system 
which will replace and augment the existing spoil bank levees. 
(See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 applies. 
Operation and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction, 
Engineering and Design activities were initiated in FY 1990 and 
continued through the fiscal year. 
Condition at the end of the fiscal year. The project 
cooperation agreement was signed in January 1995. Real estate 
acquisition was initiated in January 1996, and construction is 
scheduled to begin in May 1997. 
4. ALBUQUERQUE DIVERSION 
CHANNELS, NM 
Location. The project is located in an area which comprises 
watersheds of ephemeral streams entering a 15-mile reach of the 
Rio Grande from the east at Albuquerque, NM, and vicinity. 
2. ALAMOGORDO, NM 
Location. The project is located in south central New 
Mexico in Otero County, in and near Alamogordo, NM. The 
city is situated at the foot of the Sacramento Mountains near the 
eastern edge of the Tularosa (Closed) Basin. 
Proposed Project. The authorized project consists of a 
concrete and rip-rap lined diversion channel with a Standard 
Project Flood flow capacity, which will intercept flows from 
the Sacramento Mountains east of the City. For a description 
of the complete improvement and authorizing legislation see 
page 694 of Annual Report for 1966. 
Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 applies. 
Operation and Results during fiscal year. An Interim 
Letter Report, which addressed locally preferred alternatives 
for the 100-year flood protection, was prepared and submitted. 
The letter report was approved and a General Reevaluation 
Report is being prepared. 
Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Study efforts 
continued through FY 1995. 
3. ALAMOSA, CO 
Location. The project lies in south central Colorado along 
the Rio Grande, in the community of Alamosa, CO. 
Combined drainage area of the tributaries is about 276 square 
miles. The Sandia range of the Rocky Mountains, which is about 
12 miles east of the Rio Grande, forms the eastern border of the 
watersheds. The crest of this mountain range rises more than a 
mile over the river to an elevation of 10,692 feet above mean sea 
level. (See Geological Survey Map, Albuquerque, NM, 
quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.). 
Existing project. Improvements consist of north and south 
diversion channels on high ground east of and parallel to the 
valley. Channels are designed to carry floods equal in magnitude 
to standard project flood from all tributaries. For a description 
of the complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 
17-15 of Annual Report for FY 1973. 
Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 
1938 applies. For details of local cooperation requirements see 
page 17-2 of the Annual Report for FY 1973. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. The North 
Diversion Channel prevented $2,217,000 in flood damages 
during FY 1995. The estimated total accumulated flood damages 
prevented are $146,938,800. Peak flood flows recorded during 
FY 1995 were: North Diversion Channel near Alameda 6,350 
c.f.s.; South Diversion Channel 169 c.f.s. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the North 
and South Diversion Channels began in March 1965, and was 
32-2

ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT 
completed in March 1972. The South Diversion Channel is in 
good condition and well maintained by the local interests. The 
North Diversion Channel has experienced severe arching and 
cracking of the concrete lined portion. Construction to correct 
this problem was initiated and completed in FY 1987. 
Additionally, a hydraulic flow problem exists on the North 
Diversion Channel. A model study, completed in February 
1986, identified corrective measures. The local sponsor has 
constructed some the measures recommended by the model 
testing. Because of this, the remain measures no longer exhibit 
economic justification, and hence do not warrant additional 
Federal involvement. Therefore, the project was terminated in 
September 1995. 
5. CONCHAS LAKE, NM 
Location. The dam is in San Miguel County, NM, on the 
Canadian River, just below the confluence of the Canadian and 
Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State map of New 
Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic 
map, Tucumcari quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) 
Existing project. This dam consists of a concrete gravity 
main section 1,250 feet long with a maximum height of 200 
feet above streambed located in the Canadian River Canyon 
together with earth dikes on each side having an overall length 
of about 3.7 miles. The main section contains conduits in its 
base for the release of water from the reservoir, and an 
overflow, ungated spillway 300 feet long. The earth dikes vary 
in height up to 100 feet and the north dike contains a concrete 
ogee-type emergency spillway 3,000 feet long. The reservoir 
has a gross storage capacity of 513,900 acre-feet (198,170 for 
flood control, 254,200 for water conservation and irrigation, 
and 61,530 dead storage). The dam controls 7,409 square 
miles of drainage area. (See page 17-16 of Annual Report of 
1973 for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. None Required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. The reservoir 
was operated for storage of floodwater and releases for 
irrigation purposes. Sediment damages of $161,300 were 
prevented during FY 1995. There were no flood damages 
prevented in FY 1995. Estimated total accumulated flood and 
sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1995 
were $3,859,900. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1995 
were $146,100. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits 
through FY 1995 were $10,318,800. The pool elevationat the 
start of FY 1995 was 4,196.48 feet with corresponding storage 
of 274,595 acre-feet. Total releases for this reporting period 
were 172,927 acre-feet. Releases of 103,160 acre-feet were 
made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 2,784 acre-feet 
to Bell Ranch and 66,986 acre feet to the Canadian River 
Channel. The pool elevation on September 30, 1995 was 
4,200.69 feet with corresponding storage of 312,765 acre-feet. 
Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 1,440 acre-feet. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was 
essentially complete in 1939. Irrigation of some lands 
downstream from the project began in November 1945. A cost 
sharing agreement between the Government and the State of New 
Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake 
was completed in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 
percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction 
of recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978 and 
completed in FY 1983. Painting of the penstock was completed 
in 1995. The project structures are in good condition and in 
operation. 
6. EL PASO, TX 
Location. The project is located at El Paso, El Paso County, 
TX, which is on the left bank of the Rio Grande in the reach that 
forms part of the international boundary between the United 
States and the Republic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for 
El Paso, TX; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) 
Existing project. This project consists of a single-purpose 
flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes, conduits 
and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff into 
the Rio Grande. Runoff from the tributary arroyos on the 
eastern, southern, and western slopes of the adjacent Franklin 
Mountains often inundates sections of the city and its outlying 
suburban developments. The project is divided into three 
independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and 
Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and 
Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio 
Grande in El Paso, Texas. (See Table 32-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 
June 28, 1938 applied for the Northwest and Central areas. The 
Local Cooperation Agreement for the Southeast area reflects the 
cost sharing requirements contained in the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control 
dams in operation during FY 1992 and dates of completion of 
construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams 
(February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 
1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion 
Channel (November 1978); Oxidation Pond and Buena Vista 
Diversion and Oxidation Pond Outlet Conduit (November 1980); 
Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams (June 1982); Mesa Dam (Sep- 
32-3

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
tember 1982); McKelligon Canyon Dam (October 1982); 
Keystone Dam (September 1983); Keystone Outlet Conduit 
(March 1984); Highway Diversion Channel (May 1985); Dam 
Safety Assurance Program to the existing Range and Northgate 
Dams (May 1986); Borderland Diversion Channel (September 
1986); and Phelps Dodge Basin (January 1990). During FY 
1992 flood flows and flood control storage were minimal, 
however, damages which would have resulted from these flows 
were prevented. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The Pershing Dam, Dam 
Safety Assurance work was completed in December 1992. It 
was the only remaining work in the Central Area. The 
Northwest Area of the project for all practical purposes is 100 
percent complete. 
The General Design Memorandum for the Southeast Area 
was completed in September 1987. Construction was 
completed in January 1990 on the Phelps Dodge Basin, in June 
1992 on Phelps Dodge Channel, in March 1993 on Americas 
Basin, in January 1994 on Bluff Channel Phase I, January 1995 
for Phase II. 
7. JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO 
Location. The project is located on the Arkansas River, in 
Bent County, 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles 
downstream from its source, about 18 miles upstream from the 
city of Lamar, CO. (See Geological Survey maps for Lamar 
and Las Animas, CO quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) 
Existing project. The project consists of a concrete and 
earthfill structure about 2.6 miles long with a maximum height 
of 106 feet above streambed and an overflow, gated spillway 
1,174 feet long. Total capacity of the reservoir at the top of 
flood control is 605,115 acre-feet (259,417 for flood control 
and 345,698 for conservation and recreation storage). This 
reservoir controls a contributing drainage area of 18,130 square 
miles and is operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir 
system for flood control in the Arkansas River Basin. Public 
Law 89-298 modified the act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570) 
to authorize 10,000 acre-feet of reservoir flood control storage 
space for fish and wildlife and recreation purposes. For details 
of the completed improvement and authorizing legislation see 
page 17-16 of Annual Report for FY 1973. 
Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 
June 22, 1936, applies. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the 
dam and reservoir continued. Regulation of conservation 
storage continued under rules and regulations of the Arkansas 
River Compact. Sediment damages of $519,000 were 
prevented during FY 1995. Estimated total flood and sediment 
damages prevented by this project through FY 1995 were 
$93,004,600. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1995 were 
$419,000. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were 
$26,246,700. Maximum pool elevation of 3,853.78 feet with 
corresponding storage of 368,290 acre-feet occurred on July 25, 
1995. Total releases for FY 1995 were 362,076 acre-feet. 
Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 106,605 
acre-feet. Sediment deposition was 4,634 acre-feet in FY 1995. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of the 
reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. Painting of tainter 
gates was completed in 1995. The project structures are in good 
condition and operational. 
8. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM 
Location. Improvements are on the Rio Grande and tributaries 
in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of 
individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual 
reports by projects. 
Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized 
the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of 
development of water resources of the Rio Grande Basin in New 
Mexico (H. Doc 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) with the exception 
of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate structure at 
Chamita Dam. Although recommended, Chiflo Dam and 
Reservoir was deleted from the authorized plan. It was excluded 
without prejudice from future consideration by Congress. It was 
requested at that time, by the States of Colorado and Texas, that 
the project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and 
methods of operation. By the same act, Congress also authorized 
for the construction irrigation phase of the comprehensive plan 
as recommended by the Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 
81st Cong., 2nd sess.). The act also stipulated that work should 
be prosecuted in accordance with a joint agreement approved by 
the Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on 
November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement the 
Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, 
operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, and drainage 
rehabilitation and extension phases of the unified plan of 
improvement. Authority for the Chamita Dam and Reservoir 
was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. 
(See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation and Table 32-C for 
existing projects.) 
All operations and costs for projects contained in the authorized 
plan are reflected in individual reports on the following pages. 
8A. ABIQUIU DAM, NM 
Location. The project is one unit of the flood control plan for 
the Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is 
32-4

ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT 
on the Rio Chama near the town of Abiquiu, NM, about 32 
miles upstream from the confluence of Rio Chama and Rio 
Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of 
Rio Chama, NM, from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army 
Map Service, Aztec, NM; Colorado NJ 13-1, scale 1:250,000.) 
Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 
1,540 feet long, 325 feet high, with a 12-foot diameter 
controlled outlet, and an uncontrolled spillway in a natural 
saddle about one mile north of the left abutment. The reservoir 
provides 568,000 acre-feet of flood control and sediment 
storage. Total capacity at the spillway crest is 1,198,500 acrefeet. 
For a detailed description of the completed improvements 
and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1973. A 
major rehabilitation project was completed in September 1980 
and the recreation facilities were completed in FY 1981. A 
non-Federal hydropower plant was completed in 1990 by the 
County of Los Alamos. The capacity of this plant is 13.2 
MW. Drainage adits were completed in 1990 to alleviate 
seepage problems in the north and south abutments. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the 
dam and reservoir continued. Storage and flows were 
regulated in accordance with Section 203, Flood Control Act of 
1960. On October 1, 1994, the pool elevation was 6,212.94 
feet. The maximum pool (6,244.90 feet) and storage (305,944 
acre-feet) occurred on June 25, 1995. On September 30, 1995, 
the pool elevation was 6,237.54 feet with a corresponding 
storage of 268,093 acre-feet. There was 1,856 acre-feet of 
sediment deposition during FY 1995. 
There were $25,460,700 in flood damages prevented during 
FY 1995. 
Sediment damages prevented were $207,900. Accumulated 
flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since 
completion were $390,666,200 through FY 1995. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in 
operation in February 1963. Painting of the tower shaft was 
completed in 1995. The project structures are in good 
condition and operational. 
Emergency gates were not installed in the outlet conduit of 
Abiquiu Dam during its construction. A plan for the Abiquiu 
Dam emergency gates has been prepared in accordance with 
Section 1112 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986. Construction of the emergency gates is necessary to 
increase safety and enhance flood and sediment control. A 
Design Memorandum was prepared in FY 1991. 
8B. COCHITI LAKE, NM 
Location. The dam is at river mile 340 on the Rio Grand 
(river mile 0 being at the intersection of the New Mexico-Texa 
State line with international boundary at El Paso, TX), nea 
Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from 
Albuquerque, NM. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam 
NM, quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM, quadrangle 
scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 
about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above 
streambed. The project extends generally in an east-west lin 
across the Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of the Rit 
Grande and then southward across the Santa Fe River. Ai 
uncontrolled spillway with a 460-foot-long ogee-weir and a 160 
foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is part of the embankmen 
on the south side of the Santa Fe River. Operational releases foi 
flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gate 
conduit in the left abutment on the Rio Grande. The reservoi 
has a storage capacity of 589,159 acre-feet at the spillway crest, 
of which 86,514 acre-feet is dedicated for recreation anc 
sediment control. The project controls flood waters from a 
11,695 square mile drainage area. For more improvemen 
details see page 17-7 of Annual Report for 1980. See page 17. 
14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report for authorizing legislation 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the 
dam and reservoir continued. The project was completed in June 
1975. On October 1, 1994, the pool elevation was 5,337.75 feel 
with a corresponding storage of 53,179 acre-feet. The maximum 
pool elevation was 5,375.46 feet with a storage of 131,810 acrefeet 
on July 1, 1995. On September 30, 1995 the pool elevatiom 
was 5,339.33 feet with a corresponding storage of 55,328 acrefeet. 
There was 1,450 acre-feet of sediment deposition during 
FY 1995. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 
1995. Sediment damages prevented were $162,400. 
Accumulated total damages prevented are $399,261,000. 
Conditions at end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances 
were placed in operation in 1975. The Cochiti Recreation area 
was completed in 1976, with the Visitors Center completed in 
1977. The Tetilla Peak recreation area was completed in 1981. 
Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 
8C. GALISTEO DAM, NM 
Location. The dam is at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek, a 
tributary of the Rio Grande. The reservoir will extend upstream 
32-5

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
from the dam for about 4 miles, near the village of Waldo, 
NM. (See Geological Survey Map,. San Pedro 1, NM 
quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 
2,820 feet long with a maximum height of 158 feet above the 
streambed. The outlet works consist of a 10-foot diameter 
uncontrolled outlet with a discharge capacity of 4,980 cubic 
feet per second with a pool at the spillway crest elevation. The 
spillway is a broad crested weir 250 feet long in the right 
abutment. The project has 79,600 acre-feet of flood control 
storage and 9,868 acre-feet of sediment space. For more 
details of completed improvements and authorizing legislation 
see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the 
dam and reservoir continued. Operation of the project began 
on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 
1994. No storage occurred during FY 1995. Peak inflow was 
660 c.f.s. and maximum outflow was 660 c.f.s. There was 30 
acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the 
reservoir was empty on September 30, 1995. Sediment 
damages prevented during the FY were $2,200 totaling 
$147,500 through FY 1995. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in 
operation in October 1970. The project structures are in good 
condition and in operation. 
8D. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM 
Location. The project is located in Sandoval County, NM, 
on the Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from the confluence 
of the Jemez River and the Rio Grande, about 5 miles 
northwest of Bernalillo, NM. (See Geological Survey map for 
Bernalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) 
Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 
780 feet long with maximum height of 146.6 feet above 
streambed, and off-channel uncontrolled saddle spillway 400 
feet wide, and a 13-foot diameter gated outlet in the left 
abutment with discharge capacity of 8,340 cubic feet per 
second with a pool at spillway crest elevation. The dam was 
raised 14.1 feet and the spillway widened 28 feet in 1986 and 
1987 to provide adequate discharge capability to accommodate 
the revised probable maximum flood. The reservoir has a 
capacity of 100,485 acre-feet at spillway crest (73,000 acre-feet 
for flood control and 37,485 acre-feet for sediment control). 
For more detailed description of completed improvements and 
authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 
1973. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. On October 1, 
1994, the pool elevation was 5,192.24 feet with a corresponding 
storage of 21,585 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 
5,199.02 feet with a storage of 30,705 acre-feet on July 2, 1995. 
On September 30, 1995 the pool elevation was 5,199.90 feet 
with a corresponding storage of 23,688 acre-feet. The reservoir 
was regulated for sediment control during FY 1995. Sediment 
deposition during FY 1995 was 873 acre-feet. There were no 
flood damages prevented during FY 1995. Sediment benefits 
during FY 1995 were $97,800. Estimated total accumulated 
flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 
1995 were $17,655,000. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in 
operation in October 1953. Project structures are in good 
condition and all structures are in operation. 
8E. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD 
PROTECTION, BERNALILLO 
TO BELEN, NM 
Location. The project is composed of 45 square miles of 
floodplain lying along the Rio Grande from the vicinity of 
Corrales to Belen, New Mexico. 
Proposed project. The project is authorized by the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986. The project consists of 
raising and rehabilitating 51.5 miles of levees to provide the 270- 
year level of protection, and the creation of 75 acres of wetlands 
from borrow areas within the bosque, and acquisition of 200 
acres to satisfy fish and wildlife mitigation requirements. The 
proposed project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of 
$59,300,000 ($44,600,000 Federal and $14,700,000 non-Federal) 
1 Oct 92 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 applies. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. The Limited 
Reevaluation Report was completed in FY 94 and the Project 
Cooperation Agreement for the Corrales Unit of the project was 
executed in July 1995. Construction of The Corrales Unit is 
scheduled to begin in 1996. A Limited Reevaluation report is 
underway for the Belen Unit and is scheduled to be completed in 
1997. 
8F. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM 
Location. This project is one unit of the flood control phase 
of the comprehensive plan of improvement for the Rio Grande 
32-6

ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT 
Basin in New Mexico. It is on the Rio Grande and covers a 
section of the river commencing near Truth or Consequences 
(formerly Hot Springs) at about river mile 123 and extends 
upstream to Espanola, NM, about river mile 394. (See Table 
32-D on Rio Grande Floodway.) 
Existing project. This project consists of flood protection 
and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, 
levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work 
where 
needed to protect the levees. Construction of the project is a 
joint undertaking by the Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. 
Portions to be done by the Corps will consist of levee 
enlargement, construction, of bank protection work, with 
channel-rectification and drainage-rehabilitationwork being the 
responsibility of Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed 
by local interests exist throughout the reach of the river 
involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard 
of construction, and in many places are threatened by the 
meandering river. (See Table 32-D on existing project and 
Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. In addition to the usual requirements, 
local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and 
public utility relocations or replacements required in 
construction of the project. Local interests will also be 
required to comply with requirements of Section 221, 1970 
Flood Control Act, Section 401, 1986 Water Resource 
Development Act, and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation 
Assistance Act of 1970. Total costs for all requirements for 
the completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project 
authorization were $75,000. There were no non-Federal costs 
in connection with the construction of the Cochiti to Rio Puerco 
unit of floodway. The Espanola Valley unit is in the deferred 
category. Neither the city of Espafiola nor Santa Clara Pueblo 
have given any indication that they plan any positive action to 
solve the flooding problem. For more details see page 17-8 of 
Annual Report for 1980. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. There were 
$152,300 flood damages prevented by the completed floodway 
project during FY 1995. Estimated total accumulated flood 
damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 1995 
amounted to $48,471,700. The peak flow of the Rio Grande 
through the middle valley was 7,460 c.f.s. at Albuquerque on 
April 17, 1995. The peak at San Acacia was 5,670 c.f.s. on 
July 1, 1995. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
Albuquerque unit of the Rio Grande Floodway project is 
complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Bemalillo 
to Belen unit was completed in June 1986. The General 
Design Memorandum for the San Acacia to Bosque del Apache 
unit was approved in August 1990. Construction was initiated on 
the Truth or Consequences Unit in fiscal year 1989. The 
Espafiola Valley unit was reclassified to deferred category on 17 
October 1973. 
8G. SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE 
DEL APACHE UNIT, NM 
Location. The project is located along the Rio Grande, 
extending from the upper end of the Rio Grande low-flow 
conveyance channel at the San Acacia diversion works to the 
head of Elephant Butte Reservoir. 
Proposed project. The project was authorized by the Flood 
Control Act of 1948. The project consists of the reconstruction 
of 55 miles of existing spoil bank levee which separates the Rio 
Grande low-flow conveyance channel from the cleared floodway. 
The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated total 
cost of $57,600,000 ($50,400,000 Federal and $7,200,000 non- 
Federal) 1 Oct 93 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing 
legislation.) 
Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
apply. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 modified 
the Local Sponsor's required contribution. 
9. SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM 
Location. The project is located on a lake in Guadalupe 
County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 
7 miles north of Santa Rosa, NM. (See U.S. Geological Survey 
map, Corazon, NM, sheet, scale 1:125,000.) 
Existing project. Operation of the project began in November 
1979. It consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long 
and 212 feet maximum height above the streambed. The 
purposes of the project are flood control, irrigation and sediment 
retention. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from 
the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet 
works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, 
intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete lined 
tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipator. Storage 
capacity at the spillway crest is 439,860 acre-feet which includes 
72,860 acre-feet sediment reserve, 200,000 acre-feet irrigation 
and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. The surface area of 
the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,594 acres. The 
contributing drainage area at the dam site is 2,434 square miles. 
For a more detailed report of the authorized project including 
the modification to existing Sumner Lake see page 17-8 of fiscal 
32-7

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
year 1981 Annual Report. For authorizing legislation see page 
17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. 
Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and 
maintenance of both reservoirs is the responsibility of the 
Federal Government; however, the Carlsbad Irrigation District 
is required to contribute to operation and maintenance costs an 
equal amount to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. The 
Carlsbad Irrigation District also agreed to use Sumner Lake for 
flood control. Because they realize equivalent benefits from 
storage capacity in Santa Rosa Lake, they will continue to 
fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division 
of Parks manages the recreation facilities. Activities include 
camping, picnicking, boating and hiking. 
For more requirements and details on final approval in 1974 
for transfer of irrigation storage from Sumner Lake to Santa 
Rosa Dam and Lake (formerly Los Esteros Lake) see page 17-5 
of Annual Report for 1980. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the 
dam and reservoir continued. The project was completed in 
late 1979 and reservoir operation for irrigation was started in 
March 1980. Pool elevation at the start of the fiscal year was 
4,740.03 feet with storage of 80,093 acre-feet. Total releases 
for the fiscal year were 156,675 acre-feet. Pool elevation on 
September 30, 1995 was 4,735.52 acre-feet with a storage of 
66,404 acre-feet. The maximum elevation was 4,746.27 feet 
with a storage of 101,755 acre-feet on July 20, 1995. There 
was 1,609 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the fiscal 
year. There were $160,500 flood damages prevented in FY 
1995. Sediment damages prevented during the fiscal year were 
$180,200. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits were 
83,712 acre-feet. Irrigation benefits for the fiscal year were 
$293,000 with an accumulative total of $2,606,200 through FY 
1995. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 
recreation area was completed in October 1980. Design studies 
for spillway modification were initiated in FY 1979 and 
construction was completed in FY 1982. The project structures 
are in good condition and in operation. 
10. TRINIDAD LAKE, CO 
Location. This project is located on the Purgatorie River 
about 161 miles above its junction with the Arkansas River. 
The Project is about 4 miles upstream from the city of 
Trinidad, CO. (See Geological Survey map, Trinidad, CO, 
quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. The project consists of an earthfill dam 
6,610 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above the 
streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in the left 
abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gate-controlled conduit in the 
right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,800 c.f.s. with a 
water surface at top of the flood control pool. In 1985, a 3-foot 
high parapet wall on top of the upstream face of the dam and a 
supplemental 700-foot wide rock cut emergency spillway located 
on the right abutment were constructed to provide adequate discharge 
capability and freeboard allowance to accommodate the 
revised probable maximum flood. In 1989 the recreation pool 
was increased from 4,500 to 15,967, utilizing some originally 
unallocated space in the project. The reservoir provides for 
storage of 51,000 acre-feet for flood control, 36,284 acre-feet for 
sediment, 20,000 acre-feet for irrigation, and 15,967 acre-feet 
for recreation, a total of 124,463 acre-feet. The reservoir 
controls a drainage area of 671 square miles and is operated for 
flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. 
For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 
Annual Report. 
Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation received 
from City of Trinidad and Purgatorie River Water Conservancy 
District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of 
irrigation repayment contract. For complete details of 
requirements and costs pertaining to the execution of the 
irrigation repayment contract and the addition of permanent 
storage for recreation facilities see page 17-9 of fiscal year 1980 
Annual Report. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the 
dam and reservoir continued. On October 1, 1994 the pool 
elevation was 6,160.32 feet with a corresponding storage of 
10,976 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,201.83 
feet with a corresponding storage of 38,741 acre-feet on July 24, 
1995. On September 30, 1995 the pool elevation was 6,182.26 
feet with a corresponding storage of 22,554 acre-feet. Sediment 
deposition during FY 1995 was 195 acre-feet. Sediment damages 
prevented during FY 1995 was $72,900. Accrued sediment 
benefits are $2,411,100. Irrigation benefits for FY 1995 were 
$83,100. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 1995 were 
$1,761,200. Irrigation benefit releases for the year were 21,133 
acre-feet. 
Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in 
operation in 1977. The recreation facilities were completed in 
1980. The Dam Safety Assurance Contract was completed in 
May 1983. Painting of the service bridge structural steel was 
completed in 1995. The project structures are in good condition 
and in 
operation. 
11. TWO RIVERS DAM, NM 
Location. The project is located about 14 miles southwest of 
Roswell, NM on the Rio Hondo and the Rocky Arroyo. The Rio 
Hondo is formed at the confluence of the Rio Ruidoso and the 
32-8

ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT 
Rio Bonito, near the village of Hondo, NM, in the foothills 
region east of Sierra Blanca in the southeastern part of Lincoln 
County, NM, and flows generally easterly to its confluence 
with the Pecos River near Roswell, NM. (See Geological 
Survey map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. The Two Rivers project consists of two 
dams: Diamond "A" and Rocky. The Diamond "A" Dam is an 
earthfill structure, 4,885 feet long and 98 feet high, with a 
gated outlet. The Rocky Dam is an earthfill structure 2,940 
feet long and 118 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet. No 
provision is made for water storage, except for flood control. 
Flood releases will be controlled so that flows through Roswell 
will not exceed the Rio Hondo channel capacity which is about 
600 c.f.s. The capacity of the Two Rivers Reservoir at its 
spillway crest is 163,775 acre-feet, of which 13,775 acre-feet 
are provided for sediment reserve. Together these dams 
regulate runoff from 1,027 square miles of drainage area. For 
details of completed improvement and authorizing legislation 
see page 17-18 of Annual Report for 1973. 
Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 
applies and compliance is satisfactory. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the 
dam and reservoir continued. The reservoir was empty on 
October 1, 1994. There were no flood damages prevented 
during 1995. Sediment damages prevented were $9,100. 
Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages 
prevented through FY 1995 were $85,019,900. There were 81 
acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1995. The accrued 
sediment benefits through FY 1995 are $1,089,700. 
Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete and 
was placed in operation July 1963. The project structures are 
in good condition and in operation. 
12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood 
control projects transferred to local interests for operation and 
maintenance. The projects in Texas, Colorado, and New 
Mexico were inspected. Federal costs for fiscal year 1993 
were $137,288. 
13. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL 
RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 
Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, five 
projects are operated by others for flood control. These 
projects are Platoro, Pueblo, Sumner, Navajo, and Brantley 
Dams. 
Platoro Dam on the Conejos River above the town of Platoro, 
Conejos County, CO controls runoff from 40 square miles of 
high mountain area. The authorized purposes are irrigation 
storage and flood control. Platoro is operated by the Conejos 
Water Conservancy District. Total storage is 59,571 acre-feet 
with the top 6,000 acre-feet solely for flood control. The 53,571 
acre-feet is joint use storage with flood control on a forecast 
basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by the 
Interior Appropriation Act of 1941. (See H Doc 693, 76th 
Cong., 3rd Seas.) Construction of this project was completed by 
the Bureau of Reclamation in 1952. 
On October 1, 1994 storage in Platoro Reservoir was 40,090 
acre-feet at elevation 10,012.02 feet. Maximum storage of 
53,479 acre-feet at elevation 10,027.47 feet occurred on July 31, 
1995. On September 30, 1995, storage was 48,038 acre-feet at 
elevation 10,021.38 feet. Peak flow at Mogote gage was 2,310 
c.f.s. on June 18, 1995. There were $561,700 in flood damages 
prevented by the project during FY 1995. Total flood damages 
prevented to date are at $5,720,700. Total cost for activity, by 
the Corps of Engineers during FY 1995 was $16,635. 
Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which 
was authorized under Public Law 87-590, 87th Congress, HR 
2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 
1975. Pueblo is operated by the Bureau of Reclamation and is 
located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo 
County, Colorado. Pueblo Reservoir has a total capacity of 
349,940 acre-feet at top of the flood pool with 27,000 acre-feet 
exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint use space. 
Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. 
Storage on October 1, 1994 was 99,073 acre-feet, elevation 
4,835.03 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 261,491 
acre-feet at elevation 4,881.47 feet on July 3, 1995. Storage on 
September 30, 1995 was 253,552 acre-feet at elevation 4,879.75 
feet. There were $831,800 flood damages prevented in FY 
1995. Total flood damages prevented to date are $5,281,000. 
Total cost for FY 1995 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was 
$16,759. 
Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 710.8 
in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sumner Dam was authorized 
as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior under a 
Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 
6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The 
original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of 
raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the 
service spillway floor to 56,000 c.f.s. was completed in 1957. 
32-9

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
A twenty-four inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass 
flows less than 100 c.f.s. Sumner is operated by the Carlsbad 
Irrigations District. Storage on October 1, 1994 was 25,632 
acre-feet at elevation 4,253.47 feet. Maximum storage for FY 
1995 was 37,070 acre-feet at elevation 4,258.50 feet on July 
27, 1995. Storage on September 30, 1995 was 25,810 acrefeet 
at elevation 4,253.56 feet. Total cost for FY 1995 
activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $19,435. 
Navajo Dam and Reservoir is located on the San Juan River 
at river mile 298.6 in San Juan County, New Mexico. Navajo 
Dam was authorized as part of a Colorado River Storage 
Project by an act of 84th Congress, 11 April 1956 (PL 485). 
The Bureau of Reclamation constructed and is responsible for 
operation of the project. Construction was initiated in June 
1958 and the project was completed and placed in operation in 
March 1963. Total capacity at spillway crest is 1,708,600 
acre-feet. The project controls a drainage area of 3,230 square 
miles. Storage on October 1, 1994 was 1,400,600 acre-feet, 
elevation 6,064.43 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1995 was 
1,610,400 acre-feet, elevation 6,079.36 feet on July 28, 1995. 
Storage on September 30, 19954 was 1,555,600 acre-feet, 
elevation 6,075.64 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 
1995 activity was $15,678. 
Brantley Dam on the Pecos River above the town of Carlsbad 
in Eddy County, NM controls runoff from 13,208 square miles 
of uncontrolled area. The authorized purposes are irrigation, 
flood control, fish and wildlife and recreation and for the 
elimination of the hazards of failure of the McMillan and the 
Avalon Dams. The total storage is 348,544 acre-feet with 
189,700 acre-feet for flood control. The Brantley Dam was 
authorized for construction on 20 October 1972 by Public Law 
92-514 with the cost ceiling raised for the project in October 
1980 by Public Law 96-375. On September 6, 1988 the 
conduits were closed and Brantley Dam started its initial filling. 
On September 30, 1994, the storage was 24,946 acre-feet at 
elevation 3,246.85 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 
1994 activity was $18,290. 
14. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
See Table 32-E. 
15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public 
Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). 
Costs during FY 1995 were: Little Puerco River, Gallup, 
NM, $643; Zuni River at Zuni, NM, $69,471. 
Emergency flood control activities; repair, flood fighting, 
and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and 
antecedent legislation.) 
There were no Federal costs in FY 1995 for advance 
preparation, none for flood emergency operations, and there were 
no repair and restoration costs. 
Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood 
Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) 
Camino Alire Bridge, Santa Fe River, Santa Fe, NM, $1,230; 
Highway 62 Bridge, Santa Fe River, Santa Fe, NM, $218,105; 
Highway 75, Embudo Creek, Rio Arriba, NM, $8,512; Isidro 
Road, Santa Fe River, Santa Fe, NM, $9,428; Overton Road, 
Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO, $7,196; State Highway 194, Bents 
Old Fort, Arkansas Road, La Junta, CO, $113,787; State Road 
12, Starkweather Road, Reserve, NM, ($18,749); State Road 44 
at Rio Salado, San Ysidro, NM, $176,820; Madrid Fire Station, 
NM, $23,037; Mora Sewage Lagoons, NM, 4,352, and Southern 
Bld at Black Arroyo, 192,781. 
Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control (Section 208 of 
the 1954 Flood Control Act, 83rd Cong.) 
There were no costs during FY 1995. 
General Investigations 
16. SURVEYS 
Costs for the fiscal year were $850,859 for flood damage 
prevention studies, $148,561 for special studies (coordination 
studies with other agencies). 
17. COLLECTION AND STUDY 
OF BASIC DATA 
Fiscal year costs were $237,310 for flood plain management 
and technical services. 
Hydrologic studies involving collection and study of basic data, 
such as stream flow data, collection of suspended sediment 
samples, recording rain gage data, special study for Pikes Peak 
flood warning systems, hydrometeorological studies, 
sedimentation studies, and environmental data studies continued. 
Costs during the fiscal year were $6,965.90. 
32-10

ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT 
18. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES 
Environmental Data Study costs for FY 1994 were $1,684. 
19. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND 
ENGINEERING 
Continuation of Planning and Engineering costs in FY 1995 
were $10. 
TABLE 32-A 
20. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND 
DESIGN 
Advance Engineering and Design Costs for FY 1995 were 
$6,872. 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept. 30. 1995 
1. Acequias Irrigation New Work 
System, NM 
Alamogordo, NM 
Alamosa, CO 
Albuquerque 
Diversion Channels 
Project, NM 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
(Other Contributed 
Funds) 
Conchas Lake, NM 
Approp. 851,000 808,000 
Cost 1,245,399 1,054,199 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
241,000 
250,751 
270,000 
268,438 
95,000 
88,537 
202,000 
198,776 
205,000 
204,681 
81,669 
750,000 2,104,000 10,363,000' 
518,973 1,458,000 8,627,414' 
345,000 
343,800 
397,000 3,203,000 
361,948 3,132,049 
300,000 1,023,000 
75,658 319,160 
30,000 100,00( 
22,410 36,758 
12,057,0002 
1,110,7132 
0 17,975,450 
17,747,296 
518,356 
518,356 
854,664 
854,664 
13,821,4994 
13,821,4994 
1,044,000 827,000 1,194,000 
901,113 959,639 1,100,671 
1,245,000 21,143,519 
1,331,911 21,106,817 
32-11 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5.

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Proiect Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept. 30. 1995 
Rio Grande Basin, NM 
Abiquiu Dam, NM 
Cochiti Lake, NM 
8C. Galisteo Dam, NM 
Jemez Canyon 
Dam, NM 
Middle Rio Grande 
Flood Protection, 
Bemrnalillo to Belen, NM 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
6,095,000 3,590,000 6,830,000 3,788,000 85,881,294 s 
4,869,596 6,021,890 1,690,991 4,470,823 84,178,215 
- - - - 15,555,3586 
- - - 15,555,3586 
1,527,826 1,673,000 2,069,700 1,961,900 27,823,818 
1,460,533 1,648,419 1,968,115 2,140,246 27,874,157 
- - - 26,745,028 
- - - - 26,745,028 
1,550,000 1,302,000 2,510,951 1,232,400 32,693,604 
1,618,868 1,351,351 2,200,973 1,529,197 32,668,902 
- 128,000 
- 128,000 
- 96,956,559 
- 96,956,559 
1,791,900 1,604,000 1,926,000 1,619,200 23,087,167 
1,699,299 1,771,798 1,868,275 1,708,016 23,050,468 
171,000 
162,257 
723,000 
458,915 
200,000 
132,037 
202,000 
194,029 
554,000 
725,083 
422,000 
416,988 
184,000 166,400 
190,540 170,343 
14,275,053 
14,275,053 
2,924,324 
3,067,380 
6,293,972 
6,293,972 
566,500 402,600 9,506,732 
631,877 421,531 9,495,898 
1,816,000 3,199,000 5,058,000' 
778,852 670,703 2,447,425' 
32-12 
TABLE 32-A 
(Continued) 
6. 
7. 
El Paso, TX 
John Martin 
Reservoir 
8. 
8A. 
8B. 
8E. 
8D.

ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT 
TABLE 32-A 
(Continued) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section to 
In Text Project Fundin FY FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sept. 30, 1995 
Rio Grande Floodway 
Rio Grande Floodway, 
San Acacia to Bosque 
del Apache, NM 
Santa Rosa Dam 
& Lake, NM 
Trinidad Lake, CO 
12. Two Rivers Dam, 
NM 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
4,794,868$ 
4,794,868' 
450,000 
389,372 
225,000 
177,380 
6,100,000 -4,858,000 3,464,000 
216,173 369,005 2,809,930' 
41,039,741 
41,039,056 
769,000 770,000 
754,693 740,879 
807,000 739,000 9,576,136 
783,562 798,238 9,559,170 
55,774,758 
55,774,758 
557,000 
523,991 
Maint. 
Approp. 171,000 
Cost 237.213 
'Reflects PED funding appropriations beginning in FY 1986. 
include non-Federal contributions of $2,247,000. 
2PED activities were initiated in FY 1991. 
3lncludes $750,000 FY 88 Construction General Funds and 
$300,000 O&M funds, added in FY 1992. 
4 ncludes $3,492,696 maintenance and improvement costs and 
$869,978 for emergency relief, excludes $2,279,326, cost of 
initiating project under the authority of Emergency Relief Appropriation 
Act of 1935 and $222,669, the cost for work 
performed with funds transferred to the Corps under Public 
Works acceleration Act of 1962. 
5Does not include non-Federal contributions of $1,580,000. 
331,000 
346,159 
554,000 525,000 8,095,529 
513,897 584,930 8,090,516 
224,000 334,000 
217.110 337,611 
'Excludes $59,977 emergency 
Includes $30,000 for Code 710. 
177,000 
184,559 
relief funds 
4,847,244 
4,847,244 
4,220,722 
4 919 44 
for new work. 
'ncludes $1,177,000 PED funds. 
'Includes funds for preconstruction planning of Espafiola Valley 
unit. Excludes $1,000,011 appropriated funds transferred to 
Bureau of Reclamation under memorandum of agreement 
between that agency and the Corps. 
'Includes $1,658,000 PED funds. 
'0Starting in FY 1982, AE&D programs are funded through GI 
appropriations. 
"Does not include non-Federal contributions of $3,425,000. 
32-13 
8F. 
8G. 
9. 
10. 
... I

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See 
Section 
In i eAL 
32-14 
1. 
Date 
Authorizing 
Act 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Oct. 31, 1992 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Jun. 30, 1948 
May 17, 1950 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 17, 1986 
3. 
7. 
11. 
liE. 
Project and Work Authorized 
ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM 
An Irrigation System dating back to the eighteenth century with 
significant engineering works in the settlement and development of the 
western portion of the United States. Restoration and preservation of this 
system has cultural and historic values to the region. Measures are 
necessary to restore and protect the river division structures and 
associated canals. 
ALAMOSA, COLORADO 
Authorized a flood control project for Alamosa, Colorado. 
EL PASO, TX 
A single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion 
dikes and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff in the 
Rio Grande. Consists of four independent units (NW Area, Central 
Area, and two units, Copper System and Bluff Channel of the SE Area.) 
RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM 
Authorized to be appropriated $3,500,000 to be expended by the 
Dept. of the Army for partial accomplishment of approved general 
comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin in NM and Colorado. 
Authorized to be appropriated an additional $39,000,000 for 
Department of the Army for prosecution of comprehensive plan for the 
Rio Grande Basin. 
Authorized Cochiti Dam on Rio Grande and Galisteo Dam on 
Galisteo Creek as additions to authorized comprehensive plan for Rio 
Grande Basin (Cochiti Dam was authorized in lieu of Low Chamita 
Dam of Chamita Reservoir Project on Rio Chama under "substitute 
plan"). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $58,300,000 
for Dept. of the Army for this addition to comprehensive plan for the 
Rio Grande Basin. 
Authorized installation of the Abiquiu Dam Emergency Gates by 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) 
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, 
BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM 
Authorized project for flood control, Middle Rio Grande Flood 
Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM. Authorized increase of flood 
protection through the dredging of the bed of the Rio Grande in the 
vicinity of Albuquerque, NM to an elevation lower than existed on the 
date of enactment of this Act. The project shall include the 
establishment of 75 acres of wetlands for fish and wildlife habitat and 
the acquisition of 200 acres of land for mitigation of fish and wildlife 
losses. 
Documents 
Public Law 662, 
99th Cong., 2nd 
sess. (Sec. 1113) 
Public Law 102-580 
102d Congress 
(Sec. 101) 
H. Doc. 207, 89th 
Cong., 1st 
sess.' 
H. Doc. 243, 81st 
Cong.,1st sess. 
Public Law 516, 
81st Cong., 2nd 
sess. 
S. Doc. 94, 86th 
Cong. 
Public Law 662 
99th Cong., 2nd 
sess. 
Public Law 662, 
99th Cong., 2nd 
sess.

ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT 
TABLE 32-B 
(Continued) 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
11F. Jun. 30, 1948 RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Cong., 1st sess.' 
and Channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, May and and Public Law 17, 1950 bank stabilization on Rio Grande between river mile 123 and 394 (San 516, 81st Cong., 
AcaCia to Bosque Del Apache Unit.) 2nd sess. 
11G. Oct. 31, 1992 RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO Public Law 102-580 
BOSQUE DEL APACHE UNIT, NM 102d Congress 
Modified the cost sharing to more equitably reflect the non-Federal (Sec. 102(e)) 
contribution for the project by that percentage of benefits which 
is attributable to the Federal properties; except that, for purposes 
of this subsection, Federal property benefits may not exceed 50 percent 
of the total project benefits. 
RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM 
TABLE 32-C RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM: EXISTING PROJECT 
(See Section 8 of Text) 
Miles Drainage Total 
Above Nearest Area (square Estimated 
Project River Mouth Town mile) Description Cost 
Abiquiu Dam Rio Chama 32 Espaiola, 2,147 Earthfill 325 feet high, 30,397,0963 
NM 1,212,000 
acre feet capacity 
Jemez Canyon Jemez Dam 2 Bernalillo, 1,034 Earthfill 136 feet high, 106,100 4,217,206 
NM acre-feet capacity 
Rio Grande Rio Grande 123 - - Channel rectification, levee 25,744,0002 
Floodway to 394' enlargement and 
construction 
Cochiti Lake Rio Grande 340' Cochiti, NM 11,695 Earthfill 251 feet high, 596,300 96,900,000 
acre-feet capacity 
Galisteo Dam Galisteo Creek 8 Waldo, NM 596 Earthfill 158 feet high, 89,000 14,340,280 
acre-feet capacity 
'River mile 0 is at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State Line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 
2Does not include non-Federal costs. 
sIncludes $5,383,000 major rehabilitation, $138,900 for recreation facilities and $3,600,000 for emergency gates. 
32-15

TABLE 32-D 
Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995 
OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation & 
Project Report For Construction Maintenance 
Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico 1966 189,356- 
Alpine, Texass 1977 130,488- 
Cibolo Creek, Texas' 1983 829,500- 
Cochiti Wetfields, New Mexicxo' 1994 13,863,245- 
Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, Colorado 
(Templeton Gap Floodway)' 1959 881,262- 
Creede, Willow Creek, Colorado (floodway)' 1952 219,789- 
Fountain Creek, Pueblo, Colorado' 1993 6,564,399- 
Highway 12, Colorado' 1985 120,500- 
Holly, Colorado' 1985 2,021,400- 
Las Animas, Colorado' 1980 4,956,000- 
Las Cruces, New Mexico' 1980 4,815,236- 
Pecos, Texas' 1977 480,273- 
Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colorado (Sec.212)' - 130,678- 
Pueblo, Arkansas River, Colorado (floodway levee extension)' 1954 201,958- 
Puerco River, Gallup, New Mexico' 1993 4,678,239 
Rio Grande Floodway, T or C Unit, New Mexico' 1995 12,955,052- 
Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, New Mexicos 1983 1,123,900- 
Smith Creek, Colorado' 1985 219,000- 
Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mexico' 1965 2.259.328- 
'Completed. =Responsibility of local interests. 'Inactive. *Deferred. 
32-16

LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT *
This district (total area about 230,000 square miles) 
comprises those drainage basins tributary to the Pacific 
Ocean that are in California between the Mexican boundary 
and Cape San Martin (about 265 Miles north of the 
entrance to the Los Angeles Harbor). The lower Colorado 
River drainage basin (below Lee Ferry, AZ.) 
which is southeastern California, southeastern Nevada, 
southwestern Utah, and all of Arizona, except the northeastern 
corner; that part of the Great Basin that is in 
southern Nevada and southeastern California; and the 
southern Arizona that drain southward into Mexico. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation 
1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA 
2. LA-LBHarbor (LAHarbor), CA 
3. Marina Del Rey, CA 
4. Morro Bay Harbor, CA 
5. Newport Bay Harbor, CA 
6. Oceanside Harbor, CA 
7. Oceanside Harbor Sand By-Pass, CA 
8. Port Hueneme, CA 
9. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA 
10. San Diego Harbor, CA 
11. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA 
12. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA 
13. Surfside, Sunset and Newport Beach, CA 
14. Ventura Harbor, CA 
Flood Control 
15. Alamo Dam, AZ 
16. Clifton, AZ 
17. Hansen Dam (Recreation Development), CA 
18. Holbrook, AZ 
19. Lake Elsinore, CA 
20. Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA 
21. Los Angeles River Recreation Development, CA 
22. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA 
23. Nogales Wash, 
24. Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ 
25. Phoenix, AZ,and Vicinity (Stage 2) 
26. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dam, Colorado RB, NV 
27. Rillito River, CA 
28. Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA 
29. Santa Ana River Basin and Orange County, CA 
30. Santa Paula Creek, CA 
31. San Luis Rey River, CA 
32. Sepulveda Dam (Recreation Development), CA 
33. Sweetwater River, CA 
34. Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV 
35. Tucson Diversion Channel (Recreation Development), AZ 
36. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ 
37. Whitewater River and Floodwarning, San Bernardino 
and Riverside County, CA 
38. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 
39. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 
40. Flood Control work under Special Authorization 
Page 
33-02 
33-02 
33-02 
33-03 
33-03 
33-03 
33-04 
33-04 
33-04 
33-05 
33-05 
33-05 
33-05 
33-06 
General Investigations 
41. Surveys 
42. Collection and Study of Basic Data 
43. Preconstruction Engineering and Design 
43A. Carneros Creek, CA 
43B. Lower Santa Cruz, AZ 
Tables 
Table 33-A Cost and Financial Statement 
Table 33-B Authorizing Legislation 
Table 33-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 
Table 33-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project 
Table 33-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 
Table 33-G Deauthorized Projects 
33-06 
33-06 
33-06 
33-07 
33-07 
33-07 
33-07 
33-08 
33-08 
33-08 
33-08 
33-09 
33-09 
33-09 
33-09 
33-10 
33-10 
33-10 
33-11 
33-11 
33-11 
33-11 
33-11 
33-12 
33-12 
33-12
33-1 
Page 
33-12 
33-12 
33-12 
33-12 
33-13 
33-14 
33-21 
33-35 
33-36 
33-37 
33-40

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 1995 
NAVIGATION 
1. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA 
Location. On the coast of southern California about a 
mile northwest of Port Hueneme, 65 miles northwest of 
Los Angeles Harbor, and 345 miles south of San Francisco. 
(See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5007 and 
5202). 
Existing project. For details see page 33-2 of Annual 
Report for 1981. 
Location cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. For details see page 33-2 of Annual 
Report for 1989. 
Operations during fiscal year. Normal maintenance was 
performed. 
2. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH 
HARBORS (LA HARBOR), CA 
Location. On the coast of southern California in San 
Pedro bay about 25 miles south of the City of Los Angeles, 
about 96 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and 
about 410 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. 
Previous projects. For details see page 1977 of Annual 
Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report 1984. 
Existing project. The recommended Federal project will 
include project increments 2 through 5 for the Port of Los 
Angeles. 
Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation 
required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts 
have been fully complied with. See page 33-3 of Annual 
Report for 1981 for requirements under the terms of the 
1976 Water Resources Development act. The revised 
recommended project has changed due to the withdrawal 
of the Port of Long Beach on October 1, 1991. The Port 
of Los Angeles might receive credit, contingent upon the 
Secretary of the Army's approval for advance work 
performed per WRDA 1988. 
Terminal Facilities. In Los Angeles Harbor, 82,553 feet 
of wharves, of which 75,729 feet are owned by the city 
and 6,824 feet are owned by private interest, In Long 
Beach Harbor, 58,985 feet of wharves, of which 51,775 
feet are owned by the city and 7,210 feet are owned by 
private interests. In Long Beach Harbor, Federal Government 
owns 19,700 feet of waterfront inside the Navy Mole, 
exclusive of finger piers. The Final Report presented and 
recommended four project increments. Increment No. 2 
would deepen the existing Los Angeles Harbor approach 
and entrance channels to Pier 300 to provide better 
access to dry bulk facilities. Increment No. 3 would 
further deepen the Los Angeles approach and entrance 
channel to Pier 300 and part of Pier 400, and deepen a 
south channel to provide access to the eastern side of 
Pier 400 and liquid bulk facilities. Increments No. 4 and 
5 would extend Increment No. 3 of Los Angeles to provide 
access to container terminals that would be located on 
part of Pier 300 and pier 400. The material obtained from 
the dredging willbe used to create new landfill within the 
port and shallow water habitat for the least tern. 
Operations during fiscal year. Project condition is poor. 
Continued Comprehensive Condition Survey of the Los 
Angeles-Long Beach breakwaters; preliminary indication 
that structure elevations are below project design. 
Shoaling in Los Angeles River Estuary and Los Angeles 
Harbor (East Basin Channel) affecting navigability of these 
waterways. Extensive shoaling of Los Angeles River 
Estuary and downstream movement of shoal threatens 
closure of Queen's Way Marina. Last hydrosurvey of Los 
Angeles River Estuary was March 1993; last hydrosurvey 
of Los Angeles Harbor was April 1994. Initiated contract 
for sediment testing in Los Angeles Harbor and Los 
Angeles River Estuary. Maintenance dredging programmed 
for FY95. 
Record of decision was issued on January 21, 1994. The 
Port began advance construction of increments 2 and 4 in 
September 1994 with completion planned for May 1997. 
3. MARINADEL REY, CA. 
Location. Marina Del Rey is located on Santa Monica 
Bay, 15 miles west of downtown Los Angeles, 29 miles 
northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 390 miles southeast 
of San Francisco Bay. 
Existing project. For details see page 33-3 of Annual 
Report for 1981. Existing Federal navigation project 
consists of two jetties a breakwater and navigation 
channels. A severe shoaling problem in the harbor is 
complicated by contaminated materials, causing a poten- 
33-2

LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 
tial threat to navigation and costly maintenance. 
Local cooperations. Fully complied with. County of Los 
Angeles Department of Beaches and Harbors requested 
a new study, and local support expressed by letter to 
CESPL dated August 5, 1992. 
Terminal facilities. There are over 6,000 berths servicing 
recreational craft within the Harbor and 28 additional 
transient slips located at Chase Park. A Coast Guard 
Station with a permanently assigned 82-foot cutter; a fire 
fighting detachment with a fire boat, a pumper, a ladder 
truck; and a Sheriff's Harbor Patrol with five patrol boats 
and five auxiliary vessels are on 24-hour duty. A fuel dock 
is located on the west side of the main channel. A 10-lane 
public launching ramp with parking for 740 cars and 
trailers; dry storage for 396 trailer-borne boats; and 
several commercial hoists are in operation as well as two 
haul-out yards, one containing a 100-ton and a 60-ton 
marine travel lift. Six hotels, 14 public parking lots, 26 
restaurants, 19 apartment complexes, a ship chandlery, . a 
fisherman's village shopping and tourist center, 26 restaurants, 
several snack bars, five coffee shops, and eight 
yacht clubs called the marina home port. Also included 
are sailing instruction, boat rental, repair and storage, 
harbor tours, sport fishing, yacht clubs, and retail facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. There are elevated levels 
of contaminants contained within the Marina's sediments. 
Portion of the Marina's sediments unsuitable for unrestricted 
open disposal. Efforts are underway to identify suitable 
disposal areas for these sediments. 
4. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA 
Location. On coast of southern California 110 miles 
south of Monterey Bay 120 miles northwest of Santa 
Barbara Harbor, and nearly midway between San Francisco 
and Los Angeles. (see Coast and Geodetic Survey 
Chart 5387). 
Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual 
Report for 1980. 
Local cooperation . The City of Morro Bay signed a 
FCSA September 1, 1988. Letter of intent dated August 1, 
1991. PCA scheduled for execution in FY95. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities which are adequate for 
existing commerce, comprise 640 feet of existing piers 
and 150 feet of floating docks constructed by San Luis 
Obispo County; 263 feet of floating docks constructed by 
California Department on Parks and Recreation; 1,396 feet 
of floating docks constructed by the city of Morro Bay; 
1,398 feet of privately owned piers; and 5,435 feet of 
privately owned floating docks. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Project comprises 
dredging seaward of entrance to a depth of 40' and 
dredging a sand trap within the entrance to a depth of 30. 
Project scheduled was awarded in September 1995 and 
is scheduled for completion in March 1996. 
5. NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA. 
Location. Forty miles southeast of Los Angeles. 
Existing project. Provides rubblemound entrance jetties, 
920-foot deep and 500 foot wide entrance channel and 
main channel, inner channels, a turning basin, and 
anchorage areas. Upper Newport is a shallow 800 acre 
Marine Estuary. Navigation project maintained by SPL. 
Pursuant to Section 841 and subject to Section 903 (b) of 
WRDA, 1986 the project for navigation for the Harbor is 
modified to dredge and maintain a 250-foot wide channel 
in Upper Newport Bay to boundary of Upper Newport Bay 
State Ecological Preserve to a depth of 15-feet. 
Local cooperation. Orange County by letter dated 25 
March 1987. Letter of support dated March 3, 1993. 
Operation during fiscal year. Project condition is 
adequate. 
6. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA 
Location. On the coast of southern California at Oceanside, 
about 30 miles north of City of San Diego and 80 
miles south of Los Angeles. 
Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual 
Report for 1981. 
Local cooperation . Fully complied with. Oceanside 
Small Harbor Craft District sent letter of support dated 
April 1985 and Letter of intent in March 1989. Project 
Cooperation Agreement, executed in January 1993. 
Terminal Facilities. Berthing for 957 boats, single-tie 
slips, 38 double-tie slips and 136 side-ties, of which 54 are 
33-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 1995 
visitors' slips); 12 dry storage spaces at Oceanside Marine 
Center; a fuel dock; a boat hoist; a launching ramp, which 
can accommodate 4 launchings at the same time; parking 
for 1,732 cars; with temporary parking for about 141 boat 
trailers; a boat-repair facility; a pump-out facility; a Coast 
Guard cutter; restaurants; retail stores; yacht brokers; a 
hotel/motel; condominiums; and a sport-fishing facility. 
Navigation improvements include initialnew dredging and 
biannual dredging of expanded entrance channel area. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Maintenance and 
new work dredging of 480,000 cubic yards were completed. 
Hydro survey was performed in January 1994. Also, 
a three-year maintenance dredging contact was awarded 
in September 1994. The operations and maintenance 
manual was completed in August 1994. 
7. OCEANSIDE HARBOR SAND BYPASS, 
CA 
Location. On the coast of southern California along 
Oceanside Beach near jetty, about 30 miles north of city 
of San Diego and 80 miles south of Los Angeles. 
Existing project. Underwater experimental pumping 
system with the pumps, fluidizers, and submerged pipeline 
to remove sand from harbor entrance and deposit it to 
down coast beaches, on a continual basis. 
Phase I and Phase II have both been completed and 
successfully tested. The experiment is complete and we 
have determined the bypass technology can be installed 
with a successful operation but, not at Oceanside. 
Local cooperation . City of Oceanside officials are in full 
support of the closure of the experimental bypass project. 
Operation during fiscal year. Currently, the District is 
negotiating with the contractor to terminate the service 
contract and requested the contract to perform demobilization 
of equipment. 
8. PORT HUENEME, CA 
Location. On the coast of southern California about 65 
miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, 
about one mile southeast of Channel Islands Harbor, 
immediately west of the City of Port Hueneme, four miles 
southwest of the City of Oxnard, and 10 miles southeast 
of the City of Ventura. 
Existing project. Authorized in 1970 for restudy of 
completed project. The harbor serves both military and 
commercial uses with port facilities consisting of terminals, 
wharves, and warehouses servicing a wide variety of 
products. The existing Federal project consists of an 
approach channel, entrance channel, central basin, and 
two rubblemound jetties. The Navy has plans to utilize the 
harbor more extensively for vessel berthing and repair; 
effectively reducing maneuverability in the harbor. Harbor 
District would like to use deeper draft wood pulp carrier 
vessels and possibly tankers. 
Local cooperation . Requirements are described in full 
on page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1976. The Oxnard 
Harbor District reviewed and agreed to sign the Feasibility 
Cost Sharing Agreement in September 1995. 
Operations during the fiscal year. Project condition is 
fair. Hydro survey was performed in July 1995. Latest 
inspection indicated some damages at the East and West 
Jetties. Comprehensive condition survey was initiated in 
January 1995, completion is scheduled for December 
1995. 
9. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING 
HARBOR), CA 
Location. On the coast of southern California on the 
southern portion of Santa Monica Bay, about 17 miles 
southwest of Los Angeles. 
Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual 
Report for 1981. WRDAof 1986 (H.R. 6) Conference Bill, 
Title VIII- Project Modification, Section 809 - King Harbor, 
Redondo Beach, CA modifies the King Harbor project in 
order to carry out maintenance dredging and for breakwater 
construction, and authorized the Secretary to restore 
the breakwater to a height of 22 feet and maintain breakwater 
at such height to provide greater protection from 
heavy wave action. 
Local cooperation. City of Redondo Beach officials are 
in full support of the study and have indicated desire to 
construct improvements to reduce continued storm related 
damages. 
Operations during fiscal year. Project condition is 
good. Repairs to breakwater with modifications were 
completed in September 1992. 
33-4

LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 
10. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA 
Location. On the coast of southern California just north 
of the Mexican border, about 109 miles southeast of Los 
Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. (See Coast and 
Geodetic Survey Chart 5107). 
Previous projects. For details, see page 1976 of Annual 
Report for 1915 and page 1642 of Annual Report for 1938. 
Existing project. For details, see pages 33 and 34 of 
Annual Report for 1980. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full 
on pages 33 to 35 of Annual Report for 1980. 
Terminal facilities. Consist of 45,070 feet of wharves, 
exclusive of Government-owned and 24,000 feet are 
privately owned. Government-owned wharves at North 
Island are restricted to military use only. 
Operations during fiscal year. Project condition is fair 
and there is some minor shoaling of the entrance channel. 
Normal maintenance was performed. 
11. SAN DIEGO RIVERAND MISSION 
BAY, CA 
Location. The San Diego River has its source on the 
tableland in the Cuyamaca Mountains near Santa Ysabel, 
CA, and flows southwestward 52 miles to the Pacific 
Ocean, 6 miles northwest of San Diego. Mission Bay 
Harbor is adjacent to the outlet of the San Diego River, 77 
miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. 
The Bay has a perimeter of about 11 miles and area of 
about 2,400 acres. 
Existing project. For details, see page 33-3 of Annual 
Report for 1991. Authorized by the Flood Control Act of 
1944, the existing project consists of a leveed channel, 
entrance channel, main channel, altered railroad bridge, 
Anchorage Basins (West Anchorage and Quivira) and 
three jetties. Construction of a weir in the middle jetty has 
restored design conveyance capacity at the mouth of the 
San Diego River. Los Angeles District has recommended 
replacing the existing timber pile breakwater at Quivira 
Basin with a permanent rubble-mound breakwater. Our 
recommendation for the rubble-mound breakwater project 
be implemented under the authority of the existing project 
as continuing construction of an uncompleted feature. 
Local cooperation .The city desires Federal assistance 
for improvements to reduce storm damage potential and 
shore erosion in Mission Bay area. 
Operations during the fiscal year. The weir was 
completed on March 25, 1994 and was operating as 
planned. Repairs to revetment were completed with the 
rock that was removed from the weir with some additional 
stone being brought in from an external source. 
12. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA 
Location. On the coast of southern California, 90 miles 
northwest of Los Angeles Harbor. 
Existing Project. For details on original, see page 33-4 
Annual Report for 1983. For reevaluation details see 
WRDA,1986. The recommended plan includes acquiring 
a permanent dredge for the city and they willassume the 
operation and maintenance of the channel. 
Local cooperation . See page 1015 of Annual Report for 
1969, for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized 
modification of existing project. The city reaffirmed its 
support on August 3, 1993. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging of 
480,000 cubic yards completed and post-dredge hydrographic 
survey performed in April 1994. Also, maintenance 
dredging contract awarded. 
13. SURFSIDE, SUNSET AND NEWPORT 
BEACH, CA 
Location. Project extends along Orange County Coast, 
17 miles, from San Gabriel River mouth down coast to 
Newport Bay Harbor entrance. 
Existing project. Authorization Section 101 of Rivers and 
Harbors Act 1962. Project is a periodic continuing 
construction project. 
Local cooperation. State of California, Orange County, 
Cities of Newport and Huntington Beach, and Surfside 
Colony. Letter of intent dated December 1993 sent 
through coordinating sponsor State of California, Department 
of Boating and Waterways. 
Operations during f'isal year. Engineering and design 
is in progress for Stage 10. 
33-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 1995 
14. VENTURA HARBOR, CA 
Location. Located 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles 
and six miles northwest of Channel Island Harbor. 
Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of the 
Annual Report for 1981. Reevaluation under WRDA 1990 
consists of modification to the exiting harbor by constructing 
a separate South Beach groin, extending the offshore 
breakwater, adding a spur groin to the north jetty and 
detached breakwater, and deepening and extending the 
entrance channel and sand trap. 
Local cooperation. Ventura Port District executed 
Project Cooperation Agreement, in April 1993. 
Operations during fiscal year. Hydro survey performed 
in January 1996. Maintenance dredging of the harbor 
entrance scheduled for 1996 was commenced in November 
1995. The condition of the breakwater and jetties are 
fair. Emergency repair of the breakwater was performed in 
1995. Additional repairs are needed for the breakwater 
and jetties. 
FLOOD CONTROL 
15. ALAMODAM, AZ 
Location. About 70 miles southeast of Kingman, AZ on 
the Bill Williams River, AZ a tributary of the Colorado 
River. 
Existing project. For details, see page 33-7 of Annual 
Report 1981. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and 
maintenance were completed. Project condition is good, 
except for the downstream gage. Engineering and design 
efforts are completed. Repair is scheduled to occur in 
1996. 
16. CLIFTON, AZ 
Location. Clifton is in Greenlee County, AZ, about 170 
miles northeast of Tucson. 
Existing project. The project consists of both structural 
and nonstructural elements, including an earthfill levee 
about 3,000 feet long, with floodgates and bridge modifications. 
Implementation will involve flood proofing of 11 
businesses, flood plain evacuation plans, and recreation 
development. Estimated cost (October 1994) for existing 
project is $13,400,000 (includes $1,680,000 cash contribution 
and $2,520,000 other costs). 
Local cooperation. The State of Arizona, Division of 
Emergency Services, is the local sponsor. Project 
Cooperation Agreement executed on July 30, 1993. The 
project authorized under WRDAof 1990. 
Operations during fiscal year. Final GDM approved in 
April 1993. Real Estate acquisition initiated in July 1993. 
The levee contract was awarded in September 1994. 
17. HANSEN DAM, CA 
Location. In the San Fernando Valley area of the city of 
Los Angeles about 20 miles northwest of downtown Los 
Angeles. Recreation lake and facilities lie within flood 
control basin boundaries. 
Existing project. Original project authorized under Flood 
Control Act 1936, and modified by WRDA 1986, Section 
847 Energy and Water Development Act 1992 (PL 102- 
104). Proposed plan is to construct a 10.5-acre recreation 
lake, picnic facilities, access roads, and parking lots. 
Local cooperation. Project is 50/50 cost shared with 
the City of Los Angeles. 
Operations during fiscal year. Debris removal license 
has been extended through 1998. Master Plan for recreation 
is completed. Feature Design Memorandum is 
completed. Plans and specifications for first phase (8-A 
contract) complete. 
18. HOLBROOK, AZ 
Location. In the City of Holbrook, AZ, about 150 miles 
northeast of Phoenix. 
Existing project. The plan will provide 100-year-flood 
protection by raising and extending the existing Corps of 
Engineers levee on the north side of the Little Colorado 
River, building a ring levee around the McLaws area, 
relocating residents of the south bank flood plain east of 
the Apache Railroad, acquisition of ponding areas and 
wildlifemitigation. It is the NED plan. The authorized plan 
33-6

LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 
is a double levee offering SPF protection. Estimated cost 
(October 1994) for existing project is $14,600,00 (includes 
an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction 
period), of which $11,000,000 is Federal and $3,600,0- 
00 is non-Federal (includes $2,558,000 cash contribution 
and $1,342,000 other costs). 
Local cooperation. The City of Holbrook signed the 
Project Cooperation Agreement, on August 24, 1993. 
Operations during fiscal year. Real estate acquisition 
was initiated in October 1993 and relocation of southside 
residents continued. 
19. LAKEELSINORE, CA 
Location. In Riverside County, about 70 miles southeast 
of downtown Los Angeles, and 30 miles southeast of the 
city of Corona. 
Existing project. The project consists of an earthentrapezoid 
outlet channel about 2.5 miles long, with a 30- 
foot to 80-foot base and IVon 3H side slopes. The outlet 
channel will relieve flooding at the 100-year-flood level 
around the perimeter of the lake. The project included 
building six bridges and protecting an endangered species 
habitat. 
Local cooperation. Riverside County Flood Control and 
Water Conservation District signed a Local Cooperation 
Agreement on March 27, 1992. 
Operations during fiscal year. Construction contract 
closed out. 
20. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE 
AREA, CA 
Location. Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, 
Rio Hondo, and Compton Creek, CA. 
Previous Project. For Details, see pages 1768 to 1772 
of Annual Report for 1942; page 1602 of Annual Report for 
1942; and page 1535 of Annual Report for 1943. For 
details on units see Annual Report for 1991. Authorized 
WRDA 1990 Section 101.B; Chief of Engineers Report 4 
June 1992. 
Existing project. Project consists of channel improvement 
to lower Los Angeles, Rio Hondo Rivers, Compton 
Creek, and modification/replacement of as many as 27 
Sbridges necessitated by the channel improvements. A 
map of the rehabilitation plan is in "General Design 
Memorandum, Los Angeles River Rehabilitation under the 
Major Rehabilitation Program," dated January 1984 and 
revised in March 1984. 
Local cooperation. The Los Angeles County, Department 
of Public Works signed the Project aCooperation 
Agreement, fully executed August 7, 1995. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and 
maintenance were completed. Project condition of dams 
and channels is good. 
21. LOS ANGELES RIVER RECREATION 
DEVELOPMENTAL, CA 
Location. Upper Los Angeles River from Sepulveda 
Flood Control Basin (located 25 miles northwest of the city 
of Los Angeles) to the confluence of the Arroyo Seco 
channel, a distance of 20 miles. 
Existing project. The upper Los Angeles River consists 
primarily of a rectangular channel from the Sepulveda 
Basin to a point approximately four miles above the 
Arroyo Seco, thence as a trapezoidal channel of the 
Arroyo Seco. 
Local cooperation. Project is 50/50 cost shared with 
City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation. 
Operations during fiscal year. This project was created 
in FY94, funds in the amount of $400,000 were provided 
to initiate and complete a master plan (MP). 
22. MOJAVE RIVERDAM, MOJAVE 
RIVER BASIN, CA 
Location. On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream 
from the mouth of Deep Creek and about 14 miles 
upstream from Victorville,in Mojave River Basin, CA. 
Existing project. For details, see page 33-8 of Annual 
Report for 1983. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full 
on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and 
33-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 1995 
maintenance was completed. Project condition is good. 
Local agencies have indicated interest in operations and 
maintenance recreational development immediately 
upstream & downstream of the dam. This will help 
considerably in controlling access. There has been 
extensive de facto off road vehicle use both upstream and 
downstream sides of the dam. 
23. NOGALES WASH, AZ 
Location. At the Mexican Border, in extreme southern 
Arizona in central and northern portions of the city of 
Nogales, about 60 miles south of Tucson. 
Existing project. Plans include a lateral collector 
channel to capture Overland Street flow and divert in into 
the existing covered channels; a 3,300-foot-long grouted 
stone/concrete channel system in the Chula Vista community, 
and a flood warning system and recreation component 
associated with Chula Vista channels. Current plan 
includes a interceptor channel and levee at Chula Vista 
and a floodwarning system in Mexico and United States. 
Local cooperation. Project Cooperation Agreement 
scheduled for execution in May 1996. Sponsor expressed 
willingness to financially participate in the construction of 
the project at a level consistent with current cost-shared 
policy. 
Operation during fiscal year. Flood warning system 
installation not yet approved by Mexico; currently International 
Boundary and Water Commission is negotiating with 
Mexico to seek their permission in order for us. to install 
equipment in Mexico. Mexico considering improvements 
to East Channel lateral collector -Corps progress on hold. 
Repair of damages cause by spillway flow in January 1993 
were completed in January 1994. Contract has been 
awarded to repair the downstream gaging station and 
construct seepage control measures in FY95. 
25. PHOENIX, AZ, AND VICINITY 
(STAGE 2). 
Location. Project located in Maricopa County, AZ, 
adjacent to metropolitan Phoenix, AZ. 
Existing Project: For details see Annual Report FY91 
page 33-7. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum 
No. 3, General Design Memorandum Phase I, plan 
Formulation for New River and Phoenix City Streams, 
Arizona," Prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1981. 
Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2 
detention basins and recreation facilities; ACDC, 16.5 
miles long of which 4,300 linear feet (LF) is covered at 
Paradise Valley and Alta Vista (locals withdrew support for 
Central Ave), total levees about 4.0 miles, flowage easement 
about 19.5 miles long; 3.1 mile channel along new 
and Agua Fria River's; and bank stabilization about 2.2 
miles along Skunk Creek and New River. 
Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full 
on page 33-9 Annual Report for 1981. Project Cooperation 
Agreement relating to covered channel executed in 
July 8,1992 by Flood Control District of Maricopa County. 
Operations during fiscal year. Physically prepared an 
O&M Manual for the project. Project is complete. Project 
close out is in progress. 
26. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS 
24. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIV- DAMS, COLORADO RIVERBASIN, NV 
ER), AZ 
Location. About 20 miles northwest of Gila Bend, and 
120 miles southwest of Phoenix, AZ. 
Existing project. For details, see page 33-9 of Annual 
Report for 1981. 
Local cooperation . Requirements are described in full 
on 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and 
maintenance were completed. Project condition is fair. 
Location. In Lincoln County, NV, about 100 miles north 
of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, 
east of Caliente, NV. 
Existing project. For details, see page 33-13 of Annual 
Report for 1981. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and 
maintenance were completed. Project condition is good. 
33-8

LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 
27. RILLITORIVER,CA 
Location. The project is located in Tucson metropolitan 
area of Pima County, AZ. 
Existing project. Plan of improvement includes: building 
a soil cement bank for erosion control and gradecontrol 
structures in the channel bottom to prevent 
degradation along 13.2 miles of the river. Estimated cost 
(October 1993) for existing project is for $40,400,000 
includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the 
construction period), of which $30,200,000 is Federal and 
$10,200,000 is non-Federal (includes $8,077,000 cash 
contribution and $2,123,000 other costs). 
Local cooperation. Pima County Transportation and 
Flood Control District submitted letters of assurance on 
February 24, 1986 and May 6, 1987. PCA was executed 
in June 1994. 
Operation during fiscal year. Design completed in Apiril 
1994; construction for first increment from North Campbell 
to Shannon Road was completed in May 1995. 
28. SANTA ANA MAINSTEM,CA 
Location. Along a 75-mile reach of the Santa Ana River 
in San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange Counties, 
emptying into the Pacific Ocean between the cities of 
Newport Beach and Huntington Harbor, 50 miles south of 
Los Angeles, and 90 miles north of San Diego. 
Existing project. For details, please see page 33-9 of 
the Annual Report for 1987. Plan of improvement: Seven 
Oaks Dam, management of overflow area - Seven Oaks to 
Prado; raise MillCreek Levee; additional storage at Prado; 
improvements along: Oak Street Drain/Riverside Co., 
Santiago Creek/Orange Co., and Lower Santa Ana River; 
recreation development: mitigation and preservation; and 
San Timoteo. Estimated cost October 1994 for existing 
project is for $1,446,000,000 (includes an allowance for 
estimated inflation through the construction period, of 
which $920,000,000 is Federal and $526,000,000 is non- 
Federal includes $79,000,000 cash contribution and 
$447,000,000 other costs). 
Local cooperation. Counties of San Bernardino, Riverside, 
and Orange. Project Cooperation Agreement, signed 
on December 14, 1989. 
Operations during fiscal year. Delay in placement at 
Seven Oaks due to winter rains and rock slide on right 
abutment. Reduced placement on San Timoteo Creek 
Reach 1 due to differing site conditions. Late award of 
landscaping contracts for Reach 1 and 10, and Oak Street 
Drain resulted in low placement in FY95. Engineering and 
design continue on the Lower Santa Ana River, Prado 
Dam and San Timoteo Creek. 
Completed Construction: Upper Oaks St (Oct 94) Rch 2 
(Jan 94), Rch 3&4 (May 95). 
Continued Construction: Rch 5&6, 7 Oaks Emb/Spill, San 
Timoteo Creek Rch 1. 
Awarded Construction: 1&10 Landscaping (Mar 95), Oak 
St Landscaping (Aug 95). 
The San Timoteo Creek Reach 2 construction contract has 
been advertised, with bid opening indefinitely postponed 
pending the Sponsor's establishment of an assessment 
district to provide funding for the project. Currently, San 
Bernardino County is forecasting that the Board of 
Supervisor's will vote on the district sometime mid-Jan 
1996. 
29. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN AND 
ORANGE COUNTY, CA. 
tocation. On the Santa Ana River and tributaries and on 
other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino 
Counties, CA. 
Existing project. For details on units, see Annual Report 
for 1968. 
Local cooperation . Fully complied with. Orange County 
Water District advocated an increase in water conservation 
at Prado Dam up to elevation 505'. Prado Basin includes 
significant riparian wetlands, including nesting areas of the 
endangered least Bell's vireo. The Basin is currently 
under review as proposed critical habitat for the vireo. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and 
maintenance was completed. Project condition of dams 
and channels is good. 
30. SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA 
Location. Santa Paula Creek is a tributary of the Santa 
Clara River in the vicinity of the City of Santa Paula, 
Ventura County, about 16 miles from the ocean and 
33-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 1995 
approximately 60 miles northwest of downtown Los 
Angeles. 
Existing project. Authorized by Flood Control Act of 
1970, Public Law 91-611 (HD 443/80/1), for details see 
Annual Report FY91, page 33-10. Estimated cost (October 
1994) for existing project is $21,900,000 (includes an 
allowance for estimated inflation through the construction 
period), of which $20,300,000 is Federal and $1,600,000 is 
non-Federal (includes $0 cash contribution and $1,600,000 
other costs). 
Local cooperation. Ventura County Flood Control 
District. No authorization is required; therefor, the existing 
Sec 221 Agreement will be amended. Amend- ment 
scheduled to be executed May 96. 
Operations during fiscal year. Debris due to storms of 
1991-1992 and 1992-1993 caused damage to existing 
phase one channel. First channel repair completed in 
May 1993, second repair contract initiated in January 
1994. Conference held in May 1993 identified some 
justifiable alternatives for the reevaluation study regarding 
deteriorating reach of original project. 
31. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA 
Location. Along the lower 7.2 miles of the river, in and 
around the city of Oceanside, San Diego County, about 86 
miles south of Los Angeles. 
Existing project. A double levee, 5.4 miles long; stone 
protected channel with a soft bottom; 1,330 feet of 
parapet walls at the ocean on the north and south levees; 
six interior drainage ponds; and a five-mile bike trail. 
Estimated cost (October 1995) for existing project is 
$76,100,000 of which $55,700,000 is Federal and $20,400,- 
000 is non-Federal (includes $3,900,000 cash contribution 
$16,500,000 other costs). 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with the city of 
Oceanside. 
Operations during fiscal year. Levee construction in 
Reach 4 was completed September 1995. 
Location. The project is located between the communities 
of Encino and Van Nuys, 15 miles northwest of Los 
Angeles. Plan consists of 1.65 miles of trapezoidal 
grouted stone channel with fish ladder modification of the 
railroad bridge, and mitigation. 
Existing project. Flood Control Act 1936 and Public Law 
77-387 1941, and 1989-1972. Primary project purpose is 
flood control. Subsequent Act of Congress authorized a 
secondary project purpose for park and recreation. 
Local cooperation. Project is 50/50 cost shared with 
the City of Los Angeles. Federal funds willcomplete Lake 
Balboa and park with comfort station, trails, fencing, 
irrigation, childrens play area and revegetation and 
develop an additional wildlife area. The city willcontinue 
reclaimed water distribution and develop several park 
areas. 
Operations during fiscal year. Private conservation 
groups keep constant watch and desire that remaining 
agricultural areas be dedicated to wildlife. PCA and 
finance plan were submitted and approved by HQUSACE 
and OASA(CW). Construction scheduled to be initiated in 
winter 1996. 
33. SWEETWATERRIVER, CA 
Location. The project empties into San Diego Bay in the 
city of Chula Vista and National City and unincorporated 
San Diego County, four miles south of the city of San 
Diego, and eight miles north of the Mexican Border. 
Existing project. Construction of 3.2 miles of channel 
improvements along the Sweetwater River from Interstate 
805 to San Diego Bay, in combination with State Route 54 
and Interstate 5 construction; and construction of two 
railroad bridges and 188 acres of preservation and 
mitigation land. 
Local cooperation . San Diego County signed 221 
Agreement in December 1984. 
Operations during fiscal year. The required environmental 
monitoring is being performed and expected to 
continue for the next 3 years. 
32. SEPULVEDA DAM (RECREATION 34. TROOPPIICCAANAAN ADNDF LFALMAMININGGOO 
DEVELOPMENT), CA WASHES, NV 
33-10

LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 
Location. West of and through urbanized Las Vegas 
community along both washes. 
Existing project. The project consists of 4 detention 
basins in conjunction with 4 debris basins and approximately 
28 miles of interconnecting channels. 
Local cooperation. The Clark County Regional Flood 
Control District signed the Project Cooperation Agreement 
on February 7, 1995. 
Operations during fiscal year. The first contract, Red 
Rock Dam, was awarded May 30, 1995. Engineering and 
design effort is continuing on Tropicana Dam. 
35. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL 
(RECREATION DEVELOPMENT), AZ 
Location. The Tucson Detention Basin and Diversion 
Channel is in southeast Arizona. The project area initiates 
within the basin and proceeds approximately five miles 
downstream, until is meets Interstate 19. 
Existing project. The recreational development will 
consist of a bicycle and hiking trail; four rest areas at the 
basin's inlet and outlet areas, near the intersection of Park 
Ave. and Ajo Way, across the street from Wakefield Middle 
School and the near Interstate 19, where the project ends; 
four channel undercrossing areas at Ajo Way (near the 
basin's outlet), Interstate 10; Kino Parkway; and Benson 
Highway; a restroom facility and five to seven car parking 
area located near the end of the project area; lighting at 
rest areas; benches; pedestrian bridges; and landscaping. 
The flood control channel maintains a 30-40 foot width, 
with a average 30 foot right-of-way on each side of the 
channel. The trail system will primarily be located along 
the north bank of the channel. 
Local cooperation. Pima County is the local sponsor. 
Operations during fiscal year. Completed the master 
plan, public workshop, and Environmental Assessment. 
Initiated plans and specifications and PCA. Construction 
is scheduled to start in summer 1996. 
36. WHITLOWRANCH DAM, QUEEN 
CREEK, AZ 
Location. Fifty miles southeast of Phoenix, AZ in Pinal 
County, on Queen Creek, AZ a tributary of Gila River, 
about 10 miles west of Superior, AZ. 
Existing project. For details see page 33-10 of Annual 
Report 1981. Project element earthfill Dam, circular 
conduit outlet works and reservoir. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and 
maintenance was completed. Project condition is good. 
Project is ungated and requires little maintenance. 
37. WHITEWATEIRIVERBASIN FLOODWARNING 
SYSTEM, CA 
Location. The Coachella Valley area of San Bernardino 
and Riverside Counties, about 100 miles east of the city of 
Los Angeles. 
Existing project. Rain and stream gages have been 
installed in appropriate locations in the Whitewater River 
tributary basin. Receiving and processing stations are 
operational at two local emergency agency offices. 
Local cooperation . The Coachella Valley Water District 
signed the local cooperation agreement in August 1989. 
Operations during fiscal year. Installation of equipment 
complete. 
38. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Inspection of 22 completed and two partially completed 
local flood control projects consisting of the following: 375 
miles of channels, six dams, and appurtenances, and 23 
debris basins. Inspection costs for FY95 were $757,542. 
39. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL 
RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 
In accordance with Section seven, Flood Control Act of 
1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood control were 
conducted; and preparation of regulations for the use of 
storage allocated for flood control was continued. The 
flood control structures were Hoover, Twitchell, and Tat 
Momolikot Dams. Costs for FY95 were $151,111. 
33-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 1995 
40. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER BASIC DATA 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public 
Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization) 
See Table 33-J on flood control work under special 
authorization. 
Emergency bank protection (sec. 14 of 1946 Flood 
Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) 
Federal cost for fiscal year was $343,360. 
Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood 
fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., 
and antecedent legislation) 
Federal cost for fiscal year was $39,631 for advance 
mobilization preparation and no cost for disaster preparedness 
program. 
Flood insurance activities (sections 1301-1377, 1968 
Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90- 
448, as amended) 
In coordination with flood control activities, flood insurance 
studies were continued in accordance with Inter- 
Agency Agreements under Housing and Urban Development 
reimbursable order. Total reimbursable in FY95 was 
none. 
GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
41. SURVEYS 
Total fiscal year costs were $6,959,226 of which $869,7- 
50 was for navigation studies; $4,885,531 was for flood 
damage prevention studies; $525,370 was for shoreline 
protection studies; $1,300,711 for special studies; $49,030 
for review of completed projects; $78,325 for special 
investigations; $10,663 for FERC licensing activities; 
$3,312.86 for National Estuary Studies; $3,001 for North 
American Waterfowl Management Plan; $18,477 for 
coordination studies with other agencies; and $189,930 for 
Planning Assistance to States ($47,284 for Arizona and 
$136,727 for California). 
42. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
Technical assistance was performed for other Federal 
agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection 
with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal 
year costs of $319,983 and $5,332 for hydrologic studies. 
43. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 
AND DESIGN 
Fiscal year expenditures were $3,311,668 of which 
$895,134 was for projects not yet authorized for construction 
and $141,505 was for projects authorized for 
construction. 
43A. CARNEROS CREEK, CA 
Location. Located in Goleta Valley area, 6 miles west of 
Santa Barbara, and 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles. 
Description. Carneros Creek is one of several streams 
in the 48-square mile area of Goleta Valley which flow 
from southern slopes of Santa Ynez Mountains through 
residential, commercial and industrial areas of the Goleta 
into the Pacific Ocean at Goleta Beach property to be 
protected is primarily industrial. 
Local cooperation. Santa Barbara County, Flood 
Control and Water Conservation District. Under WRDAof 
1992 H.R.6167, the recommended project consists of an 
off-line excavated debris basin in combination with a diversion 
channel connecting to an existing borrow pit that will 
be modified slightly to become a detention basin north of 
U.S. Highway 101. 
Operations during fiscal year. Project reclassified to in 
active status. 
43B. LOWER SANTA CRUZ, AZ 
Location. Study area in lower reach of Santa Cruz River 
in Pinal County about 50 miles south Phoenix, AZ and lies 
between town of Red Rock and confluence of Gila River. 
Damage area is experiencing accelerated urbanization as 
a result of growth pressure from the Phoenix and Tucson 
metro areas. 
Local cooperation. Authorized under Flood Control Act 
33-12

LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 
28 June 1938 (Gila River and Tributaries). Local Sponsor 
Pinal County Flood Control District reaffirmed support in 
letter dared, 26 October 1993. 
Operations during fiscal year. Project is being closed 
out. 
33-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 95 
TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 30 Sep 95 
1. Channel Islands, 
CA 
- 5,123,345 
- 5,123,345 
2. Los Angeles and 
Long Beach 
Harbor, CA 
(Regular Funds) 
(Required Contrib. 
Funds) 
Model Study 
3. Marina del Rey, 
CA 
(Regular Funds) 
4. Morro Bay 
Harbor, CA 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
741,600 2,202,000 
760,456 2,203,111 
863 
510,000 
436,874 
987,000 
976,712 
485,000 
324,000 
2,391,000 
2,166,477 
9,839,842 
9,352,051 
- 29,749,000 
- 29,749,000 
- 1,219,655 
- 1,219,655 
482,000 
478,901 
150,000 
210,104 
152,000 
151,830 
156,000 
106,885 
141,390 1,182,500 
143,394 940,444 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
440,000 
642,760 
- 100,000 
- 38,371 
4,406,858 
4,431,939 
1,300,000 
100,995 
8,767,887 
8,727,012 
156,000 
106,885 
9,125,774 
9,100,334 
1,400,000 
139,366 
5. Newport Bay 
Harbor, CA 
Maint.: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
694,000 
757,969 
298,000 2,191,000 
283,011 2,157,041 
- 200,000 
- 165,197 1,580 
794,000 15,526,471 
827,115 15,478,457 
12,000 
12,014 
212,000 
209,292 
33-14 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
1,902,000 36,354,120 
1,912,234 36,337,757

LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 30 Sep 95 
6. Oceanside 
Harbor, CA 
7. Oceanside Harbor 
Sand By- 
Pass, CA 
8. Port Hueneme 
CA 
9. Redondo Beach 
(King Harbor) 
10. San Diego 
Harbor, CA 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Required: 
Cash 
Cost 
Navy 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
2,405,000 
848,281 
726,000 
738,007 
293,000 
1,562,849 - 261,162 
386,600 
177,115 
- 1,364,000 
876,615 1,536,676 
1,342,000 
1,010,685 
735,000 
452,850 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
852,000 
656,184 
(431,000) 
984,963 
(37,600) 
2,472 
39,000 
118,570 
409 
401 
3,088,000 
2,972,393 
- 1,187,500 
- 1,187,500 
- 1,599,547 
- 1,599,547 
595,000 11,022,787 
599,077 11,020,697 
4,730,000 24,035,900 
1,361,946 20,293,850 
155,000 
148,337 
129 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
1,885,000 
1,885,000 
1,411,165 
1,404,502 
5,235,343 
5,235,296 
- 18,501,990 
- 18,501,990 
Contrib. 
Cash 
Cost 
Contrib. 
Requited 
Cash 
Cost 
712,192 
712,192 
1,922,122 
1,922,122 
33-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 95 
TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 30 Sep 95 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
11. San Diego River 
and Mission 
Bay, CA 
12. Santa Barbara 
Harbor, CA 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
3,045 
80,000 825,000 
56,742 47,291
- 132,000 
- 131,289 
300,000 
715,450 
- 291,400 
16,212 8 285,963 
787,000 1,556,500 1,268,000 
886,582 1,403,594 1,395,554 
122,000 
116,966 
177,491 
4,488 
2,102,000 
2,136,128
- 376,000 
- 165,347 
209,500 
- 206,345 
13. Surfside, Sunset 
and Newport 
Beach, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Required 
(Contrib. Funds) 
14. Ventura Harbor 
(Ventura 
Marina), CA 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
46,862 24,187 
2,785,000 2,392,400 
1,888,498 3,375,893 
200,000 
167,224 
10,057 
440,006 
642,790 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
1,000,000 
369,830 
16,368,100 
15,664,898 
- 7,430,965 
- 7,220,222 
1,283,000 28,138,336 
1,277,364 28,080,460 
190,370 
715,819 
906,189 
33-16 
4,799,190 
4,672,931 
6,742,345 
6,534,174 
3,561,689 
3,560,726 
17,897,774 
17,853,930 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
16,000 
Contrib. 
Required 
Cash 
Cost 
360,000 
165,347

LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 30 Sep 95 
15. Alamo Dam, AZ 
Contrib. 
Required 
Cash 
Cost 
Other Con 
trib. 
Maint: 
Cash 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
1,552,000 3,417,836 
43,952 1,909,509 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
16. Clifton, AZ 
(Federal Funds) 
(Required 
(Contrib. Funds) 
(Required Funds, 
(Other) 
17. Hansen Dam, 
CA 
18. Holbrook, AZ 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Oth Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
863,000 
906,365 
300,000 
318,243 
700,000 
606,613 
864,000 
778,659 
782,000 
854,837 
300,000 2,092,000 
192,451 723,071 
142,000 
424,060 
285,000 
2,159 
1,209,000 
100,678 
204,000 2,079,000 5,250,000 
219,941 430,552 3,572,234 
916,000 13,522,859 
824,529 13,357,859 
4,141,000 
5,413,097 
165,000 
215,142 
1,159,000 
12,557 
4,505,000 
1,175,161 
3,900,000 
3,631,076 
8,833,000 
8,626,124 
450,000 
217,301 
2,368,000 
1,252,000 
1,248,512 
4,505,000 
1,175,161 
33-17 
947,463 
3,417,836 
3,145,679 
258,500 
242,273 
16,934,000 
16,934,000

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 95 
TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 30 Sep 95 
19. Lake Elsinore, 
CA 
20. Los Angeles 
County 
Drainage Area, 
CA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Required 
(Contrib. Funds) 
21. Los Angeles 
River, CA 
22. Mojave River 
Dam, Mojave 
River Basin, CA 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Other Contrib: 
Approp. 
Cost 
217,000 
184,785 
355,000 3,330,000 
168,465 3,389,114 
2,315,000 3,319,000 
1,812,395 3,440,228 
- 837,988 
- 628,118 
(333,000) 
46,849 7,432 
1,920,000 
2,163,630 
1,920,000 
1,997,516 
16,776 
2,496,100 1,832,800 3,091,000 
2,500,897 1,821,087 1,817.434 
235,000 
- 120,761 
215,000 
209,774 
241,000 
241,660 
115,000 
108,000 
183,000 
337,421 
2,896,000 
2,394,812 
1,860,000 
40,024 
800,000 
249,713 
5,000,500 
4,983,562 
9,811,067 
9,812;000 
1,860,000 
40,024 
3,557,988 
2,875,347 
- 34,223,000 
- 34,207,799 
2,645,400 75,259,702 
2,747,049 74,920,943 
165,000 
149,439 
254,000 
250,244 
400,000 
270,200 
5,322,536 
5,306,464 
- 17,838,198 
- 17,838,198 
- 932,848 
- 932,848 
33-18

LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 30 Sep 95 
Nogales Wash, 
AZ 
Painted Rock, 
AZ (Gila Rvr) 
Phoenix, AZ and 
Vicinity (Gila 
Rvr) 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
164,151 2,115 
744,000 2,204,400 2,673,000 
754,849 209,158 2,559,145 
New Work: 
Approp. 24,037,000 
Cost 25,543,262 
13,147,000 
13,291,791 
300,000 
3,034,663 
205,000 
107,419 
950,000 
1,146,833 
1,477,000 
1,376,789 
18,311,183 
18,177,676 
- 259,948,297 
160,872 259,777,835 
Pine & Mathews 
Canyons Dam, 
Colo River 
96,138 
96,138 
21,000 
16,956 
- 1,401,248 
- 1,401,248 
27. RillitoRiver, 
AZ 
28. Santa Ana River 
Mainstem, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Required 
(Contrib. Funds) 
29. Santa Ana River 
Basin OC, CA 
30. Santa Paula 
Creek, CA 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
1,105,000 
1,006,469 
1,156,000 4,200,000 
841,314 4,690,238 
59,089,000 73,828,000 
64,717,151 63,375,949 
2,448,248 2,866,669 
4,307,231 2,742,084 
Maint: 
Approp. 2,012,500 
Cost 1,995,217 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
711,000 
785,876 
1,832,000 
1,821,987 
904,000 
974,478 
8,081,000 16,106,000 
6,318,158 11,008,396 
96,113,000 60,978,000 361,016,000 
74,524,889 78,209,809 341,688,377 
3,214,000 
3,404,352 
1,861,000 
1,817,434 
1,041,000 
1,094,479 
5,844,100 20,075,100 
5,287,177 17,526,858 
1,938,400 39,348,494 
1,961,607 39,223,670 
800,000 
839,848 
8,489,000 
8,476,265 
33-19 
23. 
24. 
25. 
Other Contrib: 
Approp. 
Cost 
26. Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
250,060 
253,909 
20,788,062 
18,021,194 
2,126,329 
2,121,323 
254,000 
252,642

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 95 
TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 30 Sep 95 
31. San Luis Rey 
River, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
New Work: 
Approp. 16,992,000 
Cost 16,562,010 
6,624,000 11,052,000 
7,098,135 9,663,873 
6,270,000 54,700,000 
6,376,513 53,102,522 
(Required 
(Contrib. Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
(Other) 
Sepulveda Dam, 
CA 
33. Sweetwater 
River Basin, CA 
34. Tropicana/ 
Flamingo, NV 
(Federal Funds) 
(Required 
(Contrib. Funds) 
35. Tucson Diversion 
Channel 
(Recreation), AZ 
Whitlow Ranch 
Dam, Queen 
Creek, AZ 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
1,700,000 
1,820,000 
700,000 
299,900 
New Work: 
Oth Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Req Contr 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
335,927 
60,928 
458,620 
458,258 
6,140,000 1,121,000 
6,456,306 1,237,947 
106,000 
7,765 
(73,000) 
(7,851) 
400,000 
552,407 
60,558 
122,456 
441,484 
38,251 
1,475,000 4,615,000 2,585,000 
1,197,676 3,283,001 2,460,984 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
200,000 
120,761 
750,000 
581,620 
3,800,000 
3,218;380 
14,900 
14,900 
4,815,000 
277,954 
7,804,115 
2,971,842 
(18,000) 34,782,503 
139,346 34,615,721 
- 206,000 
- 168,836 
5,892,000 
3,410,634 
250,000 
92,875 
2,850,000 
343,088 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint: 
Approp. 
Cost 
67,200 
117,835 
81,000 
79,499 
47,000 
46,044 
107,000 
107,622 
15,651,000 
10,368,570 
250,000 
92,875 
3,050,000 
482,371 
1,867,963 
1,867,963 
1,433,850 
1,434,472 
33-20 
32. 
36.

LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 30 Sep 95 
37. Whitewater 
River Floodwarning 
System, CA 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 20,018 
400,000 
374,602 
PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
43A. Carneros Creek, 
CA 
New Work: 
Approp. 
Cost 
531,100 
334,977 
432,000 
516,462 
93,000 
193,900 
- 1,056,000 
10,364 1,055,703 
33-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 95 
TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 30 Sep 95 
Sep. 3, 1954 
June 3, 1988 
June 25,1896 
July 25, 1912 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Sep. 22, 1922 
Mar. 3, 1925 
July 3, 1930 
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA 
Harbor for light-draft vessels and shore protection 
works. 
LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, 
CA 
A breakwater 8,500 feet long, east of Point 
Fermin. 
Extend said breakwater to shore, making a 
total length of 11,152 feet from Point Fermin. 
Dredge Los Angeles outer harbor west of 
entrance channel. 
For silt-diversion works. 
Triangular area approach to Los Angeles inner 
harbor entrance channel. 
Dredge Los Angeles Harbor main channel and 
entrance 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; 
dredge inner harbor turning basin 35 feet 
deep; and reclamation of Reservation Point. 
A detached breakwater 12,500 feet long in 
prolongation of existing breakwater (authorized 
by act of 1896). 
H.Doc. 362,83d Cong., 2d 
sess. 
S.Doc.18, 55th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H.Doc. 969, 60th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc.8, 62d Cong., 
2d sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc.9, 64th 
Cong.,2d sess. 
H.Doc. 1013, 66th 
Cong.,3d sess. 
H. Doc.349, 68th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc.33, 71st 
Cong., 2d sess. 
33-22 
1. 
2.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZINGLEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Do. S.Doc.130, 71st Con.,2d 
sess. 
Widen fairway on east side of entrance to Los 
Angeles inner harbor; dredge a channel 35 
feet deep and 400 feet wide in Cerritos channel 
from U.S. station 406 to Long Beach turning 
basin; entrance channel to Long Beach 
Harbor 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; and 
maintenance of the Long Beach breakwater 
south of outer end pier A. This act provides 
that in no case shall dredging be done within 
50 feet of established pierhead lines of existing 
piers and wharves. 
Dredge 1,000-foot wide entrance channel to 
Los Angeles outer harbor to 40-foot depth 
and a turning basin 3,500 feet long and 1,500 
feet wide to same depth; and enlarge entrance 
to inner harbor by dredging to 35-foot 
depth a triangular area at its junction with 
turning basin. 
Dredge to a depth of 40 feet area A and B 
adjacent to 40-foot-depth entrance channel; 
construct and maintain a rubblemound breakwater 
of composite type 21,000 feet long in 
eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance 
dredging of A and B, and at mouth of 
Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject 
to such modifications as in discretion of 
the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to 
meet requirements of the Navy. 
33-23 
S.Committee print, 74th 
Cong., 1st sess. 
H.Doc.843, 76th Cong., 
3d sess. 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Oct. 17, 1940

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZINGLEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Sep. 3, 1954 
July 14, 1960 
Oct. 22, 1976 
H.Doc.161, 83d Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc.401,86th Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H.Doc.94-594, 94th 
Cong., 2d sess.1 
33-24 
Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin as 
a modification of existing project. This act 
provides that the Secretary of the Army is 
authorized to reimburse local interests for 
work they have done upon this project prior 
to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests 
so far as same shall be approved by 
Chief of Engineers and found to have been 
done in accordance with the project hereby 
adopted and that such reimbursement shall 
be subject to appropriations applicable thereto 
or funds available therefor and shall not 
take precedence over other pending projects 
of higher priority for harbor improvements; 
and that such payments shall not exceed 
$500,000. 
Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as 
a modification of existing project. 
Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 
45 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 
feet long; Los Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 
750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; 
inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 
feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East 
Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, 
and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet 
deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 
3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, 
from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 
feet long. This act provides that no dredging 
shall be done within 125 feet of established 
pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZINGLEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Nov. 17, 1988 If non-Federal interest carry out any work Public Law 100-676. 
associated with such project which is later 
recommended by the Chief of Engineers and 
approved by the Secretary, the Secretary may 
credit such non-Federal interest an amount 
equal to the Federal share of the cost of such 
work, without interest. In analyzing costs and 
benefits of such project, the Secretary shall 
consider the costs and benefits produced by 
any work which is carried out under the preceding 
sentence by non-Federal interests and 
which the Secretary determines is compatible 
with such project. The feasibility report for 
such project shall include consideration and 
evaluation of the following proposed project 
features: Long Beach Main Channel, Channel 
to Los Angeles Pier 300, Channels to Los 
Angeles Pier 400, Long Beach Pier "K"Channel, 
and Los Angeles Crude Transshipment 
Terminal Channel. 
Section 4(d) of WRDA 1988 (102 Stat. 4015) is 
amended by inserting after "approved by the 
Secretary" in the first sentence the following: 
"or which is carried out after approval of the 
final report by the Secretary and which is 
determined by the Secretary to be compatible 
with the project". 
MARINADEL REY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, 
CA 
Harbor for light-draft vessels. 
MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA 
Adoption and improvement of existing entrance 
channel to bay, a breakwater extending 
south by west from Morro Rock, and bay 
channels and basins at locations and of dimensions 
substantially as shown on the Navy 
Department map on file in the Office of the 
Chief of Engineers. 
33-25 
H.Doc.389, 83d Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H.Doc.283, 77th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Nov. 28, 1990 
3. Sep. 3, 1954 
Mar. 2, 1945 4.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZINGLEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
May 22, 1991 
Oct. 27, 1965 
May 22, 1991 
Aug. 13, 1968 
Mar. 21, 1950 
Mar. 3, 1875 
Sep. 19, 1890 
June 25,1910 
Mar. 4, 1913 
July 27, 1916 
S. Doc.PL99-662 (WRDA 
1986, Sec 
841). R&H Acts 1937 & 
1945 
S. Doc. 138 78th Cong. 
H.Doc.76, 89th Cong., 1st 
sess. 
EWDA Act 1992. 
6. 
33-26 
NEWPORT BAY HARBOR (& REVIEW),CA 
Maintenance and improvement of main and 
inner channels. 
OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA 
Maintenance of general navigation features of 
Del Mar Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. 
OCEANSIDE HARBOR SAND BY-PASS SYSTEM, 
CA 
Maintenance of general navigation features of 
Del Mar Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. 
PORT HUENEME, CA 
Adoption and maintenance of existing harbor 
for deep-draft vessels; dredged central basin 
to 35 feet deep, and extend southern-most 
interior channel. 
REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), 
CA 
Maintain harbor dredging and breakwaters. 
SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA 
Diversion dike. 
Jetty on Zuniga Shoal. 
Dredge channel through outer bar 30 feet 
deep and 600 feet wide, and a channel 
through middle ground to 30 feet deep. 
Dredge channel through outer bar 570 feet 
wide and 35 feet deep, and a channel through 
middle ground 32 feet deep. 
Widen approach (area B) to San Diego municipal 
pier by dredging area C (north of area 
B). 
H.Doc.362, 90th Cong., 
2d sess. 
R&H Act 1950 (H.Doc 303 
81st Cong.) PL99-662 
(WRDA 86, Sec 809), 
Amended in WRDA 1988. 
Annual Report. 1873; 
p.1142 
H.Ex.Doc.177, 50th 
Cong., 1st sess. (Annual 
Report, 1888; p.2114). 
H.Doc.961, 60th Cong., 
1st session. 
H.Doc.1309, 62d Cong., 
3d sess. 
H.Doc.648, 64th Cong., 
1st sess. 
7. 
8, 
9. 
10.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZINGLEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Sep. 22, 1922 
Mar. 3, 1925 
July 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935 2 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Oct. 17, 1940 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Aug. 13, 1968 
July 24, 1946 
Dredging area A (south of area B). 
Dredge 35-foot channel through middle 
ground. 
Dredging areas D and E. 
Widen approach (area C) to San Diego municipal 
pier 1 by dredging an portion of area F 
(north of area C). 
Deepen to 40 feet channel through outer bar; 
along south and north banks, main channel; 
dredge turning basin, widen area H, and 
dredge a channel to National City and Chula 
Vista 
Widen bay channel to 2,200 feet with depth of 
35 feet from the vicinity of Whalers Bight in 
lower bay to Naval Air Station opposite turning 
basin. 
Dredging areas Q.Q-1, M, N, and O. 
Dredge a seaplane basin (area S.) of about 
3,000 acres, 10 feet deep, and fillan area of 
about 110 acres adjacent to southern end of 
basin. 
Dredge triangular approaches to 26-and 35- 
foot anchorages, area M. 
Deepen and extend existing navigation channels, 
delete uncompleted parts, and extend 
maintenance. 
SAN DIEGO RIVERAND MISSION BAY, CA 
Modification of existing flood control project 
for San Diego River, CA, to include a multiplepurpose 
project for flood control on San Die- 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc.8, 64th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc.140, 65th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc.1000, 66th Cong., 
3d sess. 
River and Harbors Committee 
Doc.2, 68th Cong., 
1st sess. 
S.Doc.81, 71st Cong., 2d 
sess. 
H.Doc.223, 73d Cong., 2d 
sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc.89, 74th 
Cong., 2d sess. 
H.Doc.844, 76th Cong., 
3d sess. 
H.Doc.390, 77th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc.365, 90th Cong., 
2d sess. 1 
H.Doc.760, 79th Cong., 
2d sess. 1 
33-27 
11.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZINGLEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Dec. 31, 1970 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Aug. 13, 1968 
go River and small-boat navigation on Mission 
Bay. 
SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA 
Maintenance dredging present depths into 
harbor formed by breakwater constructed by 
local interests. 
Permits maintenance by means of a fixed 
sand-intercepting plant to be provided and 
operated by and at expense of local interests. 
United States to contribute to operating expense 
an amount not to exceed $30,000 annually, 
whenever funds are allotted therefor; 
funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual 
cost of harbor maintenance if and when 
intercepting plant has been installed. 
Modification of existing project. 
Dredging and maintenance by United States. 
SURFSIDE, SUNSET & NEWPORT BEACH, 
CA 
Beach erosion. 
VENTURAHARBOR (VENTURAMARINA), 
CA 
Adoption and maintenance of existing general 
navigation features of harbor, excluding interior 
basins; construction of an offshore breakwater; 
dredging a sand trap in lee of breakwater; 
repairing existing north and middle jetties; 
and construction of recreational fishing facilities 
on jetty crests. 
S.Committee Print, 73d 
Cong., 2d sess. 
H.Doc.348, 77th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc.518, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 1 
None. 
Sec 101 of R&H Act 1992. 
H.Doc.356, 90th Cong., 
2d sess. 
33-28 
12. 
13. 
14.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACT1VITIESFOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZINGLEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Nov. 17, 1988 
15. Dec. 22, 1944 
The Harbor commonly known as Ventura 
Marina, located in Ventura County, CA, and 
adopted and authorized by section 101 of 
Public Law 90-483, shall hereafter be known 
and designated as "Ventura Harbor". 
ALAMOLAKE,BILL WILLIAMSRIVER, AZ 
Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. 
Public Law 100-676. 
H.Doc.625, 78th Cong., 
2d sess. 
Jan. 23, 1990 
WRDA 1990, Sec 3a mod- 
CLIFTON, AZ ified WRDA 1998. 
Flood control. 
Oct 2, 1992 
May 22, 1991 
Feb. 24, 1948 
June 22, 1936 
May 15, 1992 
June 28, 1936 
HANSEN DAM, CA 
Develop water conservation on existing spreading 
grounds. 
HOLBROOK, AZ 
Flood prevention and protection. 
LAKEELSINORE, CA 
Flood Control in downtown area as well as 
around perimeter of lake. 
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, 
CA 
Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control 
and related purposes at an estimated 
construction cost not to exceed $70 million. 
Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and 
tributaries to project. 
Provision of lands, easements, and rights-ofway 
and relocations by Federal Government 
instead of by local interests. (Resultant Additional 
cost to the United States, $12,541,000). 
PL 102-377 Energy & 
Water Appropriation Act, 
1993. 
WRDAof 1986, PL 99- 
662. 
Sec 205, 1948 Flood 
Control Act (1). 
None. 
None. 
H.Doc. 838, 76th Cong., 
3d sess. 
Project extended to include additional flood 
33-29 
16. 
17. 
18. 
19. 
20.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZINGLEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Aug. 18, 1937 
Dec. 22, 1944 
July 24, 1946 
May 17, 1950 
Sep. 3. 1954 
July 3, 1958 
July 14, 1960 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Dec. 30, 1963 
control reservoirs, flood control channels, and 
debris basins for flood control and related 
purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated 
$25 million for further accomplishment of plan. 
Authorized to be appropriated an additional 
$25 million for prosecution of comprehensive 
plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug. 
18, 1941. 
Authorized to be appropriated an additional 
$25 million for further prosecution of comprehensive 
plan. 
Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier 
Narrows Reservoir to Los Angeles River (in 
lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San 
Gabriel River Downstream from reservoir). 
Also authorized to be appropriated an additional 
$40 million for further prosecution of 
comprehensive plan. 
Authorized to be appropriated an additional 
$12,500,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive 
plan. 
Authorized to be appropriated an additional 
$44 million for further prosecution of comprehensive 
plan. 
Authorized to be appropriated an additional 
$32 million for further prosecution of comprehensive 
plan. 
Authorized to be appropriated an additional 
$3,700,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive 
plan. 
Authorized to be appropriated an additional 
$30 million for further prosecution of comprehensive 
plan. 
In additional to all previous authorizations, 
33-30 
None. 
None. 
None. 
None. 
None. 
None. 
None. 
None. 
None.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZINGLEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
June 18, 1965 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 17, 1988 
July 14, 1960 
May 17, 1950 
Jul. 6, 1949 
completion of improvements under to comprehensive 
plan for flood control in the Los 
Angeles River Basin at a presently estimated 
cost of $31 million for completion. 
Authorized modification of Hansen Dam by 
removing and selling dredged material to 
facilitate flood control, recreation, and water 
conservation. 
The Secretary may convey to the city of 
South El Monte, CA, approximately 7.778 
acres of real property, together with improvements 
thereon, located within the Whittier Narrows 
Flood Control Basin. 
LOS ANGELES RIVER(SEPULVEDA DAM 
TO ARROYOSECO), CA 
Recreation development for bicycle/hiking 
trails along the upper Los Angeles River. 
MOJAVE RIVERDAM, MOJAVE RIVERBASIN, 
CA 
Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. 
PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILARIVER),GILA 
RIVERBASIN, AZ 
Dam and flood control basin. 
None. 
None. 
None. 
Flood Control Act 1936, 
PL 77-387 1941, PL 89-72 
and EWDA 199. 
H.Doc.164, 86th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc.331, 81st Cong., 
1st sess. 
33-31 
21. 
22. 
23.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZINGLEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Oct. 27,1965 
May 17, 1950 
June 20, 1989 
May 20, 1991 
June 22, 1936 
June 28, 1938 
Aug. 18, 1941 
Dec. 22, 1944 
24. 
25. 
H.Doc.216, 89th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H.Doc.530, 81st Cong., 
2d sess. 
Energy and Water Development 
Appropriation Act 
1990. 
WRDA 1986, PL 99-662, 
Energy and Water Appropriation 
Act 1988, and 
WRDA. 
PHOENIX, AZ., AND VICINITY(INCLUDING 
NEW RIVER),GILARIVERBASIN 
Detention basins, diversion channels, and 
channel improvements. 
PINE AND MATIHEWSCANYONS DAMS, 
COLORADO RIVERBASIN, NV 
Dams and flood control basins. 
RILLITCRIVER, AZ 
Bank erosion control and grade control structures 
in the channel bottom to prevent degradation. 
SANTA ANA RIVERMAINSTEM,CA 
Flood control along 75 miles reach of Santa 
Ana River, recreation development, and mitigation 
and preservation. 
SANTA ANA RIVERBASIN (AND ORANGE 
COUNTY), CA 
Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control 
and related purposes for protection of 
metropolitan area of Orange County, at an 
estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 
million. 
San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion 
of improvement. Authorized to be appropriated 
$6,500,000 for initiation and partial 
accomplishment of plans for those creeks. 
1936, providing that local interests pay for 
relocations, lands, easements, and rights-ofway. 
(Estimated resultant additional cost to 
United States. $3,500,000). 
Authorized to be appropriated an additional 
$2,500,000 for prosecution of projects approved 
in above flood control acts. 
Authorized to be appropriated an additional 
$10 million for prosecution of projects adopted 
in above-mentioned flood control acts, 
including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks 
for local flood protection at San Bernardino 
and Colton, CA. 
H.Doc.688, 75th Cong., 
3d sess. 
None. 
H.Doc.534, 78th Cong., 
2d sess.l 
33-32 
None. 
26. 
27. 
28.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESPOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZINGLEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
July 3, 1958 None. 
Oct. 17, 1940 
Sep. 3, 1954 
July 14, 1960 
Oct. 22, 1976 
33-33 
Authorized to be appropriated an additional 
$8 million for prosecution of projects approved 
in above-mentioned flood control acts. 
Dredge to a depth of 40 feet area A and B 
adjacent to 40-foot-depth entrance channel; 
construct and maintain a rubblemound breakwater 
of composite type 21,000 feet long in 
eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance 
dredging of A and B, and at mouth of 
Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject 
to such modifications as in discretion of 
the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to 
meet requirements of the Navy. 
Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin as 
a modification of existing project. This act 
provides that the Secretary of the Army is 
authorized to reimburse local interest for work 
they have done upon this project prior to July 
1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests for so 
far as same shall be approved by Chief of 
Engineers and found to have been done in 
accordance with the project hereby adopted 
and that such reimbursement shall be subject 
to appropriations applicable thereto or funds 
available therefor and shall not take precedence 
over other pending projects of higher 
priority for harbor improvements; and that 
such payments shall not exceed $500,000. 
Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as 
a modification faa existing project. 
Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 
45 feet depth, 1,000 feet wide, and about 
5,500 feet long; Los Angeles channel 45 feet 
deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet 
long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 
1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; 
East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet 
wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 
45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and 
about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet 
deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 
2,000 feet long. This act provides that no 
H.Doc.843, 76th Cong., 
3d sess. 
H.Doc.161, 83 Cong., 1st 
sess. 
H.Doc.401, 86th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H.Doc.94-594,94th Cong., 
2d sess.1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZINGLEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
dredging shall be done within 125 feet of 
established pierhead lines, wharves, or other 
structures. 
Oct. 22, 1976 
Dec. 17, 1970 3 
Nov. 28, 1990 
Oct. 22, 1976 
SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA 
Flood control improvements and prevention. 
SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER 
BASIN, CA Channel and levee, and beautification 
features. 
The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, 
including Santiago Creek, CA, is modified 
to authorized the Secretary to develop 
recreational trails and facilities on lands between 
Seven Oaks Dam and Prado Dam, 
including flood plain management areas. 
SEPULVEDA DAM, CA RECREATIONFACLITIES 
SWEETWATERRIVERBASIN, CA 
Channel improvement, as part of a combined 
flood control and highway project. 
TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL (RECREATIONALDEVELOPMENT),
AZ 
The project for recreational development 
along the Tucson Diversion channel. 
1948 Flood Control Act, 
H.Doc.443, 80th Cong., 
1st sess. 
S.Doc.91-106, 91st Cong., 
2d sess. 
FC ACT 1936, (Amended 
1937, 1941, 1950) and 
Fed Water Project Recreation 
Act of 1965. 
H.Doc.148, 90th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Flood Control Act 1936 
(amended 1937) 1941, 
1950 and Fed Water Project 
Recreation Act of 
1965. 
WIIHITLOWRANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, 
GILARIVERBASIN, AZ 
Dam and flood control basins. 
33-34 
29. 
30. 
31. 
32. 
33.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIESFOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZINGLEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
July 24, 1946 WHITEWATEIRIVER& FLOODWARNING, 
SAN BERNARDINO & RIVERSIDECOUNTY, 
CA 
Flood Control system for Coachella Valley. 
H.Doc.220, 80th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Aug. 3, 1989 HR.2330, adopted 3 Aug 
1989, House Committee 
on Public Works and 
Transportation. 
33-35 
34. 
35. 
1. Contains latest published map. 
2. Date approved by Chief of Engineers under provisions of section 205. Public Law 80-858, as amended. 
3. Final date of approval by House and Senate Public Works Committees resolution under provisions of 
Section 201, Public Law 89-298.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-C OTHER AUTHORIZEDNAVIGATIONPROJECTS 
For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1994 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Dana Point, Harbor, CA Completed 1984 $ 4,737,550 1 555,147 1 
Harbor office at Morro Bay, CA3 
Los Angeles and Long Beach 
Harbors, San Pedro Bay, CA3 
Newport Bay Harbor, CA3 Inactive and 1982 796,897 621,545 s 
Active (mod) 
Port San Luis, CA Completed and 1984 1,426,0506 1,042,352 
Active (mod) 
Redondo Beach Harbor Completed and 1984 4,766,898 91,765,252 10 
(King Harbor), CA8 Active (mod) 
Sunset Harbor (Bolsa Chica Bay), CA3 
1. Excludes $4,777,000 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 
2. Includes $45,147 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 
3. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986, subject to favorable report. 
4. Public Works Administration funds. Excludes $796,897 required contributed funds and $1,100 preauthorization costs. 
5. Includes $137,622 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY1958. Excludes $7,000 other contributed funds. 
6. Includes $568,417 for new work prior to modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act. Excludes Coast Guard costs. Includes 
$104,031 expended in FY1987. 
7. Includes $54,715 for maintenance for project prior to modification by 1965, River and Harbor Act, and $18,958 for reconnaissance 
and condition surveys. Includes $90,130 expended in FY87. 
8. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. 
9. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 
10. Includes $20,517 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY58. Includes $293,167 expended in FY87. 
33-36

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FF 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-D OTHER AUTHORIZEDBEACH EROSION 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1990 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Anaheim Bay Harbor Orange Completed 1967 $ 89,119 
County, CA' 
Bird Rock area, La Jolla Completed 1967 25,881 3 
San Diego County, CA2 
Coast of California, Point Mugu, Completed 1972 1,253,5944 
to San Pedro breakwater, CA 
Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny Completed 1968 578,717 s 
State Beach), CA 
Imperial Beach, CA Active 1986 2,194,367 6 
Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, CA Active 1976 107,484 
Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA7 Completed 1960 7,912 
Oceanside, San Diego County, CA Completed 1982 4,367,4428 
San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA Active 1979 365,0009 
San Gabriel River to Newport Bay Active 1985 9,722,100 10 
(Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), 
Orange County, CA 
Ventura-Pierpont area, CA Completed (part) 1969 715,819 1 
and Deferred (part) 
1. The project authorized by the Act of Congress of October 23, 1962, H.Doc.602, 87th Cong., 2d sess., in lieu of part of the original 
Anaheim Bay Harbor project is covered under San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA 
2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 103, Public Law 87-874. 
3. Excludes 475,614 required contributed funds. 
4. Excludes $1,238,418 required contributed funds. 
5. Excludes $431,260 required contributed funds. 
6. Excludes $919,437 required contributed funds; $66,124 other contributed funds; and Coast Guard costs. 
7. Plant in service. 
8. Excludes $604,817 other contributed funds. 
9. Excludes $180,438 required contributed funds. 
10. Excludes $4,626,638 for required contributed funds. Includes $10,772 expended in FY87. 
11. Excludes $1117,406 other contributed funds for beach-nourishment betterments and $618,949 required contributed funds. 
33-37

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FF 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZEDFLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1990 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Allenville, AZI' 
City Creek levee, San 
Bernardino County, CA' 
Clifton, San Francisco River, AZ 
Coyote and Berryessa Creeks CA 
Gila River Basin, AZ: 
Camelsback Dam (Gila River) 
Gila and Salt Rivers levee 
and channel improvements 
Indian Bend Wash 
Lower Gila River levee and 
channel improvements (Gila 
River and tributaries downstream 
from Painted Rock Dam) 
Middle Gila River channel 
improvements, upper end of Safford 
Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback 
damsite to Salt River) 
Pinal Creek channel improvements 
(Globe) 
Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot 
Dam and Lake St. Clair) 
Tucson diversion channel 
Goleta, CA, and vicinity 
Hansen Dam, Los Angeles County 
drainage area, CA (mod) 
Holbrook levee Little Colorado 
River, Colorado River Basin, AZ 
Little Colorado River at Holbrook 
Needles, San Bernardino Co. 
Nogales Wash and Tributaries, AZ 
Oceanside Harbor, CA 
Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, 
Mojave River Basin, CA' 
Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, 
San Bernardino Co. CA 
Ridgecrest, Kern County, CA' 
Rose Creek channel improvements, 
San Diego, CA' 
San Diego River (Mission Valley), 
San Diego River Basin, CA 
Santa Ana River Basin, CA: 
Devil, East Twin, and Warm 
Creeks channel improvements and 
Lytle Creek levee 
Mill Creek levees 
Riverside levees 
San Jacinto River levee and 
Bautista Creek channel 
Santa Clara River levee improvement, 
Santa Clara River Basin, CA 
Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa 
Maria River Basin, CA 
Completed 
Completed 
Active 
Active 
Deferred 
Active (part) and 
Deferred (part) 
Completed 
Inactive 
Active 
Deferred 
Completed 
Completed 
Active 
7 
Completed 
Completed 
Active 
Active 
Completed 
1985 
1973 
Completed 
Terminated 
Completed 
Inactive 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
1984 
1988 
1989 
1963 
1966 
1975 
1970 
1968 
1982 
1986 
1982 
1950 
1989 
1989 
1970 
1973 
1972 
1978 
1962 
1985 
Completed 
Completed 
1961 
1959 
1961 
1984 
$ 3000000 2 
400,000 2 
12,510,000 
56,300,000 
73,201 4 
31,809,294 5
2,413,051 
402,867 
121,5094 
10,218,900 
6,922,6336 
500,000 
335,000 
1,000,000 8
11,100,000 
5,100,000 
1,000,000 9 
212,745 
195,194 
982,432 'o 
1,708,437 
7,753,937 11
617,890 12 
2,104,478 
9,258,207 13 
2,126,672 
10,079,927 14 
33-38

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FF 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZEDFLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1990 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Santa Paula Creek channel and Active 1983 4,790,173 s15 
debris basins (including Mud 
Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, CA 
Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura Completed 1984 4,000,00016 
County, CA ' 
South Fork of the Santa Clara Active 1985 632,158 
River, Santa Clarita Valley, CA1 
Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Active 1985 844,73217 
Vista, CA' 
Tijuana River Basin, CA Completed 1979 1,703,031 18 
Ventura Harbor, CA Active 1990 6,455,000 
Ventura River Basin, CA: 
Stewart Canyon debris basin and Completed 1964 939,908 19 
channel 
Ventura River levee Completed 1950 1,349,638 
33-39

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZEDFLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1990 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Whitewater River, CA: 
Banning levee-San Gorgonio Completed 1966 97,868 
River, Riverside County I 
Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Completed 1973 819,878 21 
Springs I 
Tahchevah Creek detention basin Completed 1967 1,420,55222 
and channel improvements 
Tahquitz Creek Inactive 1974 1,063,600 
Winslow (tributaries of Little Completed (part) 1973 1,831,300 
Colorado River), Little Colorado and Deferred (part) 
River Basin, AZ 
1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority 
of Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 
2. Excludes $187,965 required contributed funds. 
3. Excludes $371,058 other contributed funds. 
4. Advance planning only. 
5. Excludes $304,720 required contributed funds and 
$3,130,762 other contributed funds. Includes $31,071 expanded 
6. Includes $1,158,006 Code 710 funds since FY77. 
Excludes $749,058 required contributed funds and $394,364 
contributed funds. 
7. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 
1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. 
8. Excludes $619,912 required contributed funds and 
$91,160 other contributed funds. 
9. Excludes $514,806 required contributed funds and 
$176,295 other contributed funds. 
10. Excludes $251,000 required contributed funds and 
$154,733 other contributed funds. 
other contributed funds. 
11. Excludes $200,000 required contributed 
funds and $1,641,668 other contributed funds. 
12. Excludes $35,830 other contributed funds. 
13. Excludes $712,000 other contributed funds. 
14. Excludes $106,364 other contributed funds. 
Includes $74 expended in FY87. 
15. Excludes non-Federal costs of $295,000 for 
local cooperation items for required and $49,458 
16. Excludes $559,525 required contributed other 
funds. 
17. Includes $3,846 expended in FY87. Excludes 
$104,941 other contributed funds. 
18. International Boundary & Water Commission 
funds. 
19. Excludes $179,148 other contributed funds. 
20. Includes $6,000 Code 710 funds since FY77. 
Excludes $17,006 other contributed funds. 
21. Excludes $8,718 required contributed funds $53,470 
22. Excludes $74,718 required contributed funds. 
33-40

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FF 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE33-G DEAUTHORIZEDPROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Date Federal Contributed 
See Annual and Funds Funds 
Project Report For Authority Expended Expended 
Hodges Dam, San Dieguito 
River Basin, CA 
Las Vegas Wash tributaries, 
Colorado River Basin, NV 
Santa Amna River Basin (and 
Orange County), CA: 
1958 
1964 
1978 
Sec. 12, Public 
Law 93-251 
1977 
Sec. 12, Public 
Law 93,251 
295,191 
Aliso Creek Dam 
San Juan Dam 
Trabuco Dam 
Villa Park Dam 
Sierra Madre Wash channel, 
Los Angeles County drainage 
area, CA 
Lower Mission Creek 
Santa Barbara, CA 
University Wash and Spring 
Brook, Riverside, CA 
1950 
1986 
Sec. 1002 Public 
Law 99-662 
1986 
Sec. 1002, Public 
Law 99-662 
1986 
Sec. 1002, Public 
Law 99-662 
1978 
Sec. 12, Public 
Law 93-251 
1986 
Sec. 1002, Public 
Law 99-662 
1988 
Sec. 1001(A), Public 
Law 99-662 
1986 
Sec. 1002, Public 
Law 99-662 
1986 
1988 
1975 
33-41 
67,361 
1,641,144 
213,313

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITIONSURVEYS 
(See Section 11 of Text) 
Project Date 
33-42

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 
TABLE 33-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 24 of Text) 
Project Date 
Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, CA 
San Diego River channel and levees, San Diego River Basin, CA 
July 1987 
July 1987 
33-43

SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT *
This district comprises the Klamath River 
Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern 
and western California consisting of drainage 
basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the 
Oregon-California State line on the north to Cape 
San Martin, CA, on the south, except for basins 
tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which 
lie east of the Benecia-Martinez Bridge. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. Oakland Harbor, CA .............. 34-1 
2. Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA .... 34-2 
3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA 
(John F. Baldwin and Stockton 
Ship Channels) .................. 34-3 
4. Sonoma Baylands Wetlands 
Demonstration Project, CA ......... 34-4 
5. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA 34-4 
6. San Francisco Bay Long Term 
Management Strategy (LTMS), CA ... 34-5 
7. Reconnaissance and Condition 
Surveys ...................... 34-6 
8. Navigation Work under Special 
Authorization .................... 34-6 
9. Beach Erosion Control Work under Special 
Authorization .................... 34-6 
Flood Control 
10. Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects ................... 34-6 
11. Flood Control Work under Special 
Authorization ................... 34-6 
Navigation 
1. OAKLAND HARBOR, CA 
Location. Oakland Harbor is located in the 
City of Oakland, California, on the eastern shore of 
central San Francisco Bay immediately south of 
San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. 
Existing project. Adopted by Acts of June 
23, 1874, June 25, 1910, September 22, 1922, 
January 21, 1927, April 28, 1928, July 3, 1930, 
March 2, 1945 and October 23, 1962. The project 
was completed February 1975, except for deepening 
the tidal canal to 35 feet from Fortman Basin to 
Park Street, and to 25 feet above Park Street 
which was deauthorized November 1977. 
Reconstruction of the Fruitvale Avenue Highway 
Bridge was completed in December 1973 and 
12. Miscellaneous Work under Special 
Authorization ................. . 34-7 
General Investigations Page 
13. Surveys ...................... 34-7 
14. Collection and Study of Basic Data ... 34-7 
15. Preconstruction Engineering 
and Design ..................... 34-7 
Tables 
Table 34-A 
Table 34-B 
Table 34-C 
Table 34-D 
Table 34-E 
Table 34-F 
Table 34-G 
Table 34-H 
Cost and Financial 
Statement .............. 34-9 
Authorizing 
Legislation .............. 3413 
Other Authorized 
Navigation Projects ....... 3415 
Not Applicable 
Not Applicable 
Not Applicable 
Deauthorized Projects ..... 3415 
Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects .......... 3416 
turned over to local interests for operation and 
maintenance. Project consists of entrance channel 
to Oakland Outer Harbor, 35 feet deep from deep 
water in San Francisco Bay and 800 feet wide 
across the shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island, 
narrowing to 600 feet at Oakland Mole; thence, a 
channel and turning basin 35 feet deep and from 
600 to 950 feet wide in outer harbor to the Army 
Base. Project also provides entrance channel to 
Oakland Inner Harbor, 38 feet deep and 600 feet 
wide to Howard Terminal and 35 feet deep to west 
end of Government Island, with additional 
widening to within 75 feet of the pierhead line in 
front of Grove and Market Street (formerly 
municipal) piers and along the south side of the 
channel from Harrison Street eastward to harbor 
line point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; a channel 35 feet 
deep and 500 feet wide through Brooklyn Basin; for 
a triangular area 35 feet deep about 2,700 feet long 
34-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of 
Brooklyn Basin; a channel along north side of 
Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep and 300 feet 
wide for 1,300 feet, thence 25 feet deep and 300 
feet wide for 3,700 feet to a turning basin at east 
end of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep, 500 
feet wide, and 1,200 feet long; a channel in the 
tidal canal 35 feet deep and 275 feet wide from 
Brooklyn Basin to Park Street, thence 18 feet deep 
to San Leandro Bay; a total channel length of 8-1/2 
miles from San Francisco Bay to San Leandro Bay. 
Project also includes parallel rubblemound jetties 
at entrance to inner harbor, north jetty 9,500 feet 
long and south jetty 12,000 feet long; three 
highway bridges across the tidal canal, two of 
which (at Park Street and High Street) have been 
replaced by local interests and the Fruitvale 
Avenue Bridge constructed by Federal Government 
has been transferred to Alameda County. The 
railroad bridge has been transferred to the County 
for operation and maintenance. The Federal 
Government will reimburse the County for the cost 
of operating and maintaining the railroad bridge. 
Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 
1986 authorized deepening the 4 mile Inner and 
3.4 mile Outer Harbors channels to 42 feet deep 
and widening the entrance channel to 1,000 feet; 
relocation of the Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 
feet westward; and widening the turning basin to 
1,800 feet and constructing a 1,200 foot turning 
basin in the Inner Harbor, 42 feet deep, at mile 
3.7. Present estimated total cost for the authorized 
improvements is $86,850,000 of which $48,665,000 
(including $7,485,000 non-Federal reimbursement) 
is Federal cost (includes $125,000 Coast Guard 
cost) and $38,185,000 is non-Federal cost. Under 
WRDA 1986, the Bar Channel and Inner Harbor 
were deepened in 1992 to 38 feet deep up to 
Howard Terminal as a separable element of the 
authorized 42-foot deep project. 
Local cooperation. The Port of Oakland 
signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on 
December 9, 1994 satisfying the requirements of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 
99-662. The agreement includes the following 
requirements: (1) provide lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; 
(2) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep 
draft navigation during construction; and (3) pay 
additional 10 percent plus interests of the costs 
allocated to deep draft navigation within a period 
of 30 years following completion of construction. 
Deepening to 42' MLLW is in progress and is 
scheduled to be completed in April 1997. 
Terminal facilities. The port occupies 19 
miles on the mainland shore of San Francisco Bay. 
There are 550 acres of marine terminal facilities, 
28 deepwater berths and 25 container cranes, 
including 5 of the post Panamax type. On-dock 
covered storage space exceeds 600,000 square feet. 
Three major railroads, Santa Fe, Southern Pacific 
and Union Pacific serve the port. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: 
Construction of the -42' MLLW was awarded in 
December 1994. Deepening at the Inner and Outer 
Harbors to -42' MLLW started in May 1995. 
1,713,000 cubic yards of dredged material was 
placed at Sonoma Bayland to restore a 348 acres of 
wetlands. Dredge material was also placed at a 
ocean site and at Galbraith Golf Course. 
Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of 
Fruitvale Avenue R.R. Bridge including 
engineering and design by hired labor, cost 
$78,399; and operation and maintenance Oakland 
Inner and Outer Harbors including engineering 
and design with contract dredge. Removed 75,000 
cubic yards of shoal material from the Inner 
Harbor at a cost of $599,018. 
2. RICHMOND HARBOR 
(DEEPENING), CA 
Location. Richmond Harbor is located in 
central San Francisco Bay, in Contra Costa County 
in the City of Richmond. 
Existing project. The existing navigation 
channel extends from deep water in San Francisco 
Bay into the Port of Richmond. The Southhampton 
Shoal Channel and Long Wharf Maneuvering Area, 
at the entrance to the harbor channels are 
maintained to -45 feet MLLW. The Entrance 
Channel, Potrero Reach Channel, Potrero Sharp 
Turn, Inner Harbor and about half of the Santa Fe 
Channel, to -35 feet and the remainder of the 
Santa Fe Channel to -30 feet. The width of the 
navigation channel is 600 feet for most of its length 
to Point Richmond with two maneuvering areas: 
one in front of the Long Wharf and the other at 
Point Richmond. At Potrero Reach, the 500 foot 
width flares to about 600 feet at Point Potrero with 
a turn at the point, 1,150 feet wide and 35 feet 
deep except for a depth of 30 feet at the southerly 
34-2

SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT 
apex of the bend. Thence, the channel continues 
into the inner harbor at a width of 850 feet in a 
northerly direction to the entrance of the Santa Fe 
Channel. The Santa Fe Channel extends 
northwesterly at a width of 200 feet into the upper 
basin terminus. A turning basin is provided at 
Point Richmond, and a rubble-mound training wall 
extending 10,000 feet westerly from Brooks Island 
is also provided in the Potrero Reach. For details, 
see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 
1646 of Annual Report for 1938. 
Proposed improvements consist of a 
construction plan involving four and one-half miles 
of channel between Richmond Long Wharf and the 
Santa Fe Channel. The project would deepen the 
existing 35-foot channels to 38 feet, and provide a 
turning basin of 1,200 feet near Point Potrero. 
Approximately 2,000,000 cubic yards of sediment 
are to be dredged and transported to aquatic and 
upland disposal sites, depending on the sediment 
quality. 
The estimated cost $33,050,000 of which 
$21,245,000 (including $3,230,000 non-Federal 
reimbursement) is Federal cost (includes $125,000 
Coast Guard costs) and $11,805,000 is non-Federal 
cost. 
The existing project was authorized on October 
27,1965. Previous projects were authorized by Acts 
adopted in 1917, 1930, 1935, 1938, 1945 and 1954. 
The proposed improvements are authorized by the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 
99-662. 
Local cooperation. In accordance with the 
cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the 
local sponsor must comply with the following 
requirements: (1) pay 10 percent of the costs to 20 
feet below mean lower low water and 25 percent of 
costs between 20 and 45 feet below mean lower low 
water and (2) reimburse an additional 10 percent 
with interest of the costs allocated to general 
navigation facility of the project within a period of 
30 years following completion of construction; and 
(3) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
relocation and dredged material disposal areas 
necessary for the projects. The value of lands, 
easements, rights-of-way and dredge disposal areas 
can be credited toward the payment required under 
item (2) above. 
Terminal activities. The Port of Richmond 
encompasses nine privately-owned terminals and 
seven terminals owned by the Port. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: 
Continued preconstruction planning and 
engineering. Maintenance: Operations and 
maintenance of Richmond Inner, Outer Harbors 
including engineering and design and U.S. Hopper 
dredge Essayons. Essayons removed 369,567 cubic 
yards of shoal material from Inner Harbor and 
72,065 cubic yards from the Outer Harbor, cost 
$2,501,554. 
3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO 
STOCKTON, CA 
(JOHN F. BALDWIN AND 
STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) 
Location. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel. 
Navigation channels extending from entrance to 
San Francisco Bay to Suisun Bay near Martinez 
through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and 
Solano Counties. (See National Ocean Service 
Charts 18649, 18654 and 18656 for respective 
areas.) 
Existing project. Project provides for 
modification of the existing San Francisco Harbor, 
Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay 
Channels to the vicinity of Pt. Avon to provide 
depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 
45 feet (currently 35 feet) for main internal bay 
channels upstream to the vicinity of Pt. Avon; 
enlargement and deepening to 45 feet (currently 35 
feet) of maneuvering areas adjacent to major 
petroleum refinery terminals along the channel 
route. San Francisco Harbor Main Channel was 
completed in February 1974. The South Hampton 
Shoal Channel and the Richmond Long Wharf 
maneuvering area was completed in December 
1986. For the approved cost estimate (1991) of 
Federal cost (Corps), see Sacramento District 
Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 
1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th 
Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). 
Estimated volume of dredged material is 9 million 
cubic yards. A new alternative initially proposed 
by the sponsor would create a pipeline terminal 
north of the Richmond/San Rafael Bridge. 
Dredging of less than 50k cy and a greatly 
shortened navigation channel 2 miles long by 600 
34-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
feet wide by 45-foot deep would eliminate or 
minimize the serious issues facing project 
construction including salinity intrusion, disposal 
site selection, air quality, and endangered species 
preservation. 
Local cooperation. See Sacramento District 
Annual Report. The local sponsor, Contra Costa 
County, supports the project. 
Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, 
revised 1991, No. 31, revised 1991, and No. 32, 
revised 1986, titled respectively: "The Ports of San 
Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, 
Calif."; "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, 
and the Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and 
"The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg, and 
Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate 
for existing commerce and will be adequate for 
future commerce upon completion of new terminal 
facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: 
Continued planning engineering and design 
activities. 
4. SONOMA BAYLANDS 
WETLANDS DEMONSTRATION 
PROJECT, CA 
Location. The Sonoma Baylands site is 
located in Sonoma County, CA, approximately 25 
miles north of San Francisco near the mouth of the 
Petaluma River, on the northern shoreline of San 
Pablo Bay. 
Existing project. Authorized by Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992. The project 
includes restoration of tidal wetlands on 348 acres 
of diked lands, including construction of 11,645 feet 
of replacement levee around the landward 
periphery of the site, fifteen internal peninsulas for 
wave protection, three weirs for the discharge of 
dredged material supernatant, and modification of 
three existing high voltage electrical towers. 
Project included placement of 207,000 cubic yards 
of maintenance-dredged material from the 
Petaluma River navigation channel in a pilot 
project area and placement of 1.7 million cubic 
yards of suitable dredged material from the 
Oakland Harbor deepening projects on the 
remainder of the site. The final phase of the 
project will be to restore the area to tidal influence 
in September 1996 and monitoring of project 
success and function and corrective action if 
necessary. 
The estimated project cost is $8,000,000, of 
which $6,000,000 is Federal cost and $2,000,000 is 
non-Federal cost. 
Local cooperation. The California State 
Coastal Conservancy signed a Project Cooperation 
Agreement on May 6, 1994 satisfying the 
requirements of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992, PL 102-580 and signed an amendment 
on December 9, 1994 to include the placement of 
Oakland Harbor dredged material. The local 
sponsor must comply with the following 
requirements: (1) provide lands, easement, and 
right of ways; (2) modify or relocate utilities, roads, 
bridges (except railroad bridges) and other 
facilities, where necessary in the construction of 
the project; (pay 25 percent of the total project cost 
in accordance with Section 106 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992. The local 
sponsor has also agreed to make all required 
payments concurrently with project construction. 
Terminal facilities. N/A 
Operations during fiscal year. Completion 
of Demonstration Project Report, Environmental 
Assessment, and construction plans and 
specifications. Placement of materials in the main 
unit continued in 1995 and will be completed by 
January 1996. 
5. SAN FRANCISCO BAY-DELTA 
MODEL STRUCTURE, CA 
Location. The model, including a Class A 
regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, CA, 
adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles 
north of the Golden Gate Bridge. 
Existing project. The San Francisco 
Bay/Delta Model, which covers 17 miles of the 
Pacific Ocean beyond the Golden Gate, all of San 
Francisco Bay proper, San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, 
and all of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta east 
of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the 
northeast and Stockton and Tracy on the south, 
was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at 
Sausalito, CA, as a part of the San Francisco Bay 
and Tributaries, CA, Study authorized by the River 
and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (PL 81- 516, 
Section 110). The model was authorized as an 
34-4

SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT 
operation and maintenance project in the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, 
Section 8). The model successfully reproduces to 
the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow 
and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and 
trends in disposition of sediments. It is a useful 
tool to examine forces existing in the bay and 
estuarine system and to predict results of proposed 
changes. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the 
model continues. 
Historical summary. Original model 
construction was initiated 1956 and completed 
1957. The addition of the Sacramento-San Joaquin 
Delta to the original model was initiated 1966 and 
completed 1969. Annual visitation to the model 
averages between 100,000 to 150,000 people. The 
central exhibits were completed in December 1981. 
Extensive exhibit upgrade for the Visitor Center 
and development of Cooperative Association 
completed September 30, 1989. The Cooperative 
Association provides financial and educational 
support to visitor center programming. An active 
volunteer program exists at the Visitor Center 
providing approximately 80 man-days of effort 
monthly. Continued testing of proposals affecting 
the environmental quality of the region including, 
but not limited to: salinity intrusion, dispersion of 
pollutants, water quality, improvements for 
navigation, dredging, bay fill, physical structures, 
and other shoreline changes. Total cost of regional 
visitor exhibits and model as of September 30, 
1995, was $27,232,333, of which $10,631,056 was 
for the regional visitor center, $1,346,351 for 
exhibits, and $15,254,926 for maintenance. 
6. SAN FRANCISCO BAY LONG 
TERM MANAGEMENT 
STRATEGY (LTMS), CA 
Location. The San Francisco Bay Long-Term 
Management Strategy (LTMS) for dredged material 
disposal covers deep and shallow draft navigation 
channels of the San Francisco Bay region including 
Central San Francisco Bay, South Bay, San Pablo 
Bay and Suisun Bay environs. 
Existing project. The San Francisco Bay 
region has an annual disposal requirement of 
approximately 6 million cubic yards (mcy) to 
maintain navigation channels. The Bay also has a 
one-time new civil works requirement of 
approximately 16 mcy for the Oakland Harbor, 
Richmond Harbor, and John F. Baldwin Phase III 
ship channel. In January 1990, the Army Corps of 
Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region IX, the San Francisco Bay Water Quality 
Control Board and the San Francisco Bay 
Conservation and Development Commission 
convened with approximately thirty interested 
agencies and organizations with concerns regarding 
dredged material disposal in San Francisco Bay. 
These four agencies have the responsibility for 
regulation of the waters of the US and California 
for disposal of dredged material. 
The four agencies and the concerned 
navigation interests formed the LTMS to develop 
technically feasible, economically prudent, and 
environmentally acceptable long range solutions to 
the dredging and disposal needs for the San 
Francisco Bay region over the next fifty years. In 
determining acceptable dredged material disposal 
locations, the LTMS is evaluating a broad array of 
potential ocean, in-Bay and non-aquatic beneficial 
uses disposal alternatives. 
Local cooperation. Pursuant to their 
regulatory responsibilities, the Division 
Commander of the South Pacific Division, Corps of 
Engineers; the Regional Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX; the 
Chair of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water 
Quality Board and the Chair of the San Francisco 
Bay Conservation and Development Commission 
agreed to jointly undertake the development and 
implementation of a Long Term Management 
Strategy (LTMS) for dredging and disposal of 
dredged materials from the region. Based on the 
outputs from the LTMS, the Regional Water 
Quality Control Board and the Bay Conservation 
and Development Commission will consider 
modifications to the dredging elements of their 
respective Basin and Bay Plans for San Francisco 
Bay. 
Regulatory Streamlining. Besides 
identifying implementable disposal options, the 
LTMS will: (1) develop coordinated regional 
disposal policies between federal and state 
agencies; (2) provide a local decision-making 
framework for dredging and disposal projects; (3) 
streamline existing permit and testing procedures; 
34-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
and (4) provide a long term site monitoring 
apparatus and feedback mechanism. 
Operations during fiscal year. 
Environmental Impact Report and Management 
Plan:
A. EPA is Federal lead on a Policy EIS for 
the LTMS. Work underway on the Draft EIS. 
B. The Interim Management Plan was 
released in August 1994. 
C. The LTMS Management Plan will be 
revised following completion of the Final EIS. 
7. RECONNAISSANCE AND 
CONDITION SURVEYS 
Reconnaissance and condition surveys of 
channels to be dredged in years other than Fiscal 
Year 1995 and jetty structures were conducted on 
the following projects: Bodega Bay; Crescent City 
Harbor; Gas House Cove; Islais Creek; Oakland 
Harbor; Petaluma River; Pillar Point; Redwood 
City; Richmond Harbor; San Francisco Harbor; San 
Leandro Marina; San Rafael; Santa Cruz; and 
Suisun Channel; all in California. Fiscal year costs 
were $699,632. 
8. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation activities pursuant to Section 
107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). 
None. 
Mitigation of shore damages activities 
pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 
(preauthorization). 
None. 
9. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 
WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
Beach erosion control activities pursuant 
to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 
(preauthorization). 
None. 
10. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, 
as amended and supplemented, included a 
requirement that local interests maintain and 
operate completed flood control works in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the 
Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the 
year to determine effectiveness of operation and 
maintenance by local interests of completed local 
protection projects and works constructed under 
emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 
and 208 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 
of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99, 
84th Congress. Fiscal year cost was $276,952. Total 
cost to September 30, 1995 was $2,282,163. See 
Table 34-H for inspections made this fiscal year. 
11. FLOOD CONTROL WORK 
UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
Flood Control activities pursuant to 
Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as 
amended (preauthorization). 
Fiscal year costs were $629,184 for 
preauthorization studies of which $445,131 was for 
Petaluma River, Sonoma County, CA; $180,064 for 
San Pedro Creek, Pacifica, CA; $3,927 for Soquel 
Creek, Santa Cruz County, CA; and $62 for White 
Slough, CA. 
Emergency flood control activities-repair, 
flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 
99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). 
Fiscal year cost incurred for emergency flood 
control activities was $3,787,442 of which $253,722 
was for disaster preparedness; $3,085,210 for 
Emergency Operation; and $448,510 for 
Rehabilitation. 
Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 
1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th 
Congress). 
Fiscal year total costs were $124,426 of which 
-$200 was for Salinas River, San Ardo, CA; and 
$124,626 for Shelter Cove, CA. 
34-6

SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT 
12. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Project Modification for Improvement of 
Environment (Section 1135, PL 99-662). 
Fiscal year total costs were $7,406 for San 
Lorenzo River Habitat Restoration, CA. 
General Investigations 
13. SURVEYS 
Fiscal year costs for surveys were $1,956,571, 
of which $395,314 was for navigation studies; 
$770,873 for flood damage prevention; $157,915 for 
miscellaneous activities; $411,434 for special 
studies; $211,263 for shoreline protection studies; 
and $9,772 for coordination studies with other 
agencies. 
14. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
BASIC DATA 
Fiscal year total costs of $60,245 were 
incurred, of which $32,245 was for Flood Plain 
Management Service Program, $25,000 for 
Hydrologic Studies and $3,000 for Environmental 
Data Studies. 
15. PRECONSTRUCTION 
ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
HUMBOLDT HARBOR & BAY 
(DEEPENING), CA 
The project is located in Humboldt Bay, about 
280 miles north of San Francisco. The existing 
channel depths in the North Bay do not allow for 
the efficient movement of deep draft vessel 
commerce. Channel widening and realignment is 
also needed to allow for safe transit of deep draft 
vessels entering and leaving the Bay. The harbor 
is a major forest products port and is the only deep 
draft port between San Francisco and Coos Bay. 
The Report of the Chief of Engineers will be signed 
on 30 October 1995. 
The recommended plan includes a limited 
widening of the Entrance Channel; deepening of 
the Bar and Entrance Channel, and Middle Ground 
of the North Bay from -40' to -48' MLLW; 
deepening of the remaining North Channels to -38'; 
and improving the Samoa Turning Basin. An 
estimated 5,600,000 c.y. would be disposed at the 
proposed designated ocean disposal site and 
approximately 26,000 c.y. would be disposed at a 
confined upland site. Pre-construction Engineering 
and Design (PED) was initiated in May 1995 and 
Plans & Specs is scheduled for completion in July 
1996. The project has not been authorized for 
construction. Total costs during the fiscal year 
were $119,652 with General Investigations funds. 
Project total cost is estimated at $16,100,000 of 
which $12,000,000 is Federal cost and $4,100,000 
is non-Federal cost. The local sponsor is the 
Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation and 
Conservation District. 
NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CA 
Noyo River rises in the Coast Range, flows 
westerly, and empties into Noyo Harbor. Noyo 
Harbor is a cove on the California Coast about 87 
miles south of Humboldt Bay and 135 miles 
northwest of San Francisco. The 1962 Rivers and 
Harbors Act, modified by the 1976 Water 
Resources Development Act, authorized up to two 
breakwaters as necessary to provide protection. 
The 1976 Water Resources Development Act, as 
modified by the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986, authorized construction of additional 
channel improvements. Recommended plans of 
improvement for the breakwater and channel 
improvement were previously considered as a 
single project. Due to significant differences in the 
time required for planning and construction, each 
part is now reported separately. 
The plan of improvement for Noyo River and 
Harbor (Breakwater), CA provides for one detached 
offshore 400-foot breakwater aligned in a 
north-south direction along the southern portion of 
Noyo Cove, west of the entrance channel in Noyo 
Harbor. Estimated preconstruction planning cost 
is $3,830,000. Total costs during the fiscal year 
were $359,898 with General Investigation funds. 
Planning is about 71 percent complete. A Project 
Management Plan has been prepared to outline the 
work remaining on this project. The breakwater 
has an estimated cost of $22,900,000 of which 
$18,320,000 is Federal cost and $4,580,000 is non- 
Federal cost. Due to sponsor's inability to fulfill its 
cost-sharing requirements, preparation of a final 
GDM was terminated. However, Conference 
Report on H.R. 1905, Energy and Water 
34-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Development Appropriation Act of 1996 directs the 
Corps to investigate the viability of a prefabricated 
steel structure in lieu of a rubble mound 
breakwater, including modeling. A special report 
which will document this evaluation effort is 
scheduled at the of fiscal year 1996. 
The plan of improvement for Noyo River and 
Harbor (Channel Extension), CA provides for a 
60-foot wide channel, 7 feet deep, for a distance of 
about 3,000 feet upstream from the end of the 
existing Federal project to the Dolphin Isle Marina. 
Estimated preconstruction planning cost is 
$580,000. This project has been put in an inactive 
category at the request of the sponsor. 
PAJARO RIVER AT 
WATSONVILLE, CA 
The Pajaro River is the dividing line between 
Santa Cruz and Monterey County located 
approximately 100 miles south of San Francisco on 
Monterey Bay. Flooding in the city of Watsonville, 
the town of Pajaro, and surrounding agricultural 
lands prompted a re-examination of flood damage 
prevention in the Pajaro basin. 
The project provides for modification of the 
existing levee system built by the Corps in 1949 
and includes 2.5 miles of flood control levees and/or 
floodwalls on Salsipuedes Creek and Corralitos 
Creek, tributaries of the Pajaro River, as well as 
pump systems located outside of existing levees on 
the Pajaro River. The tributaries are located 6 
miles from the river mouth. Since the only 
alternative with Federal interest was within the 
existing 1966 Rivers and Harbor Act construction 
authority, on completion of the reconnaissance 
study, PED was initiated in March 1995. Plans 
and Specs will be completed in June 1998. Total 
costs during the fiscal year were $346,274 with 
General Investigations funds. Project total cost is 
estimated at $13,620,000 of which $10,240,000 is 
Federal cost and $3,380,000 is non-Federal cost. 
The local sponsors are Santa Cruz and Monterey 
Counties. 
SAN RAFAEL CANAL, CA 
San Rafael Canal is located on the 
northwestern shoreline of San Francisco Bay in the 
city of San Rafael, about 17 miles north of the city 
of San Francisco. The Canal is surrounded by San 
Rafael's central business district and dense 
residential areas. The Study was authorized by a 
resolution adopted by the Committee on Public 
Works and Transportation of the United States 
House of Representatives on August 8, 1984, 
Section 142 of the Water Resources Development 
Act (WRDA) of 1976 (Public Law 94-587), as 
subsequently amended in Section 705 of WRDA of 
1986 (Public Lay 99-662). 
The Feasibility Study recommended the South 
Floodwall Plan. This plan consists of 
approximately 9,500 linear feet of floodwall 
constructed along the south bank of the canal and 
1,600 feet of sheet-pile floodwall along the crest of 
the Bayfront levee on the east side of the 
canalways tract. The South Floodwall Plan has a 
benefit-to-cost ratio of 2.0 to 1. Total costs during 
the fiscal year were $749,534 with General 
Investigations funds. The estimated project cost is 
$31,500,000 of which $20,475,000 is Federal cost 
and $11,025,000 is non-Federal cost. 
34-8

SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 34-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
Bodega Bay, CA New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
A~prop. 
Cost 
Major rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Crescent City New Work 
Harbor, CA Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp 
Cost 
Major rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Fisherman's Wharf New Work 
Areas, San Francisco Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp 
Cost 
Humboldt Harbor New Work 
and Bay, CA Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Moss Landing New Work 
Harbor, CA Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Napa River, CA New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Noyo River and New Work 
Harbor, CA Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Minor rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
1. Oakland Harbor, New Work 
CA Approp. 
Cost 
(Federal Funds) Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
(Contrib. Funds) New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
- - - $1,226,765 1 240 
.... 1,226,765 1340 
155,052 112,607 36,476 55,505 2,548,296 440 
253,491 146,333 78,795 55,505 2,548,296 440 
- - - - 397,779 5 
- - - - 397,779 5 
- - - - 9,454,972 640 
- - - - 9,454,972 640 
971,927 578,247 73,208 41,425 24,677,234 7 40 
984,935 452,869 213,956 41,427 24,677,233 74o 
- - - - 525,000 8 
- - - - 525,000 8 
- - - - 9,199,000 414850 
. - 9,199,000 414950 
382,007 (49,569) - - 387,318 51 
269,691 62,747 - - 387,318 51 
- - - 125,000 9,972,299 940 
- - - 119,652 9,966,951 940 
2,076,040 2,853,922 3,110,000 2,499,000 77,383,707 10o40 
2,917,775 2,745,180 3,108,880 2,528,563 77,292,956 10o40 
- - - - 338,215 1140o 
- - - - 338,215 1140 
41,472 692,918 11,138 - 5,869,630 1240 
41,596 634,892 69,164 - 5,869,630 1240 
- - - - 1,021,274 1340 
- - - - 1,021,274 1340 
227,360 2,737 491,648 10,000 4,879,673 13 1440 
227,360 2,737 445,354 11,310 4,834,689 131440 
354,000 761,000 - 307,000 510,000 151640 
238,490 518,826 - 359,000 857,215 151740 
33,000 498,438 84,254 485,700 8,912,084 18i1s 940 
24,862 488,365 108,603 478,652 8,905,036 181940 
- - 222,810 2040 
... 222,810 2040 
1,930,000 2,828,000 2,019,000 15854,000 48,018,684 21 
1,946,689 2,395,507 2,416,022 15118,783 47,085,053 21 
1,380,011 1,929,660 1,885,664 1,385,056 45,792,735 22 
1,451,690 1,652,430 2,089,303 1,406,861 45,738,840 2 
1,010,000 - - 6 807,295 7,817,295 
400,000 450,790 - ('120,495) 730,295 
34-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
Pajaro River at 
Watsonville, CA 
Petaluma River, CA 
Pillar Point 
Harbor, CA 
Redwood City 
Harbor, CA 
Removal of 
Sunken Vessels 
2. Richmond Harbor, 
CA 
3. San Francisco Bay 
to Stockton, CA 
(John F. Baldwin 
and Stockton Ship 
Channels) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
A P rop . 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Minor rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
A~prop. 
Cost 
389,100 389,100 
346,274 346,274 
- 297,146 2340 
- 297,146 234o 
1,046,000 32,000 1,007,108 1,763,825 
651,685 410,047 917,176 1,851,037 
367 
367 
17,918 8,429 
17,918 8,429 
790,142 1,937,677 
842,097 1,918,065 
- 283,068 
- 283,068 
831,000 801,000 
855,848 704,345 
2,392,165 2,133,977 
2,441,777 2,123,511 
70,445 
90,058 
1,250,000 
1,196,550 
1,999,408 
2,004,863 
14,287,644 24 40 
14,267,127 2440 
- 6,697,396 s44 
- 6,697,396 4344 
1,571 2,195,764 44 
1,571 2,195,764 4 
- 1,672,722 2540 
- 1,672,722 2so 
73,632 13,647,273 2640 
73,632 13,647,273 2640 
- 283,068 
- 283,068 
1,174,500 
1,159,989 
3,081,642 
3,042,026 
1,142,000 835,000 946,000 1,175,000 
1,277,722 745,449 836,146 876,848 
11,340,027 2728 
11,095,143 2728 
34,572,765 2940 
34,527,389 2940 
164,689 
164,689 
36,444,200 42 
35,910,162 42 
5. San Francisco Bay New Work 
and Delta Model, Approp. 
CA Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
6. San Francisco Bay Maint. 
Long Term Approp. 
Management Cost 
Strategy (LTMS), CA 
San Francisco New Work 
Harbor, CA Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
San Francisco New Work 
Harbor and Bay CA Approp. 
(Removal of Drift) Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
2,622,883 
2,623,639 
2,623,000 
2,408,495 
1,580,000 
1,795,590 
1,719,000 
1,724,960 
1,604,000 
1,590,169 
955,000 
1,550,260 
1,184,069 1,125,694 1,993,700 
1,191,122 1,107,238 1,952,625 
1,948,000 1,576,000 2,062,000 
1,902,153 1,484,351 2,089,876 
1,301,000 
1,433,339 
320,000 
783,067 
27,318,917 
27,232,333 
10,751,000 
10,628,036 
- 2,689,356 23s0o 40 
- 2,689,356 2 3040 
889,272 36,010,455 s3140o 
922,149 35,982,605 3140 
1,907,000 
1,682,577 
36,067,580 40 
35,692,990 40 
34-10

SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
San Leandro 
Marina, CA 
San Pablo Bay 
and Mare Island 
Strait, CA 
San Rafael 
Canal, CA 
San Rafael 
Creek, CA 
Santa Cruz 
Harbor, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
4. Sonoma Baylands 
Wetlands Demo 
Project, CA 
(Contrib. Funds) 
Suisun Bay 
Channel, CA 
Suisun Channel, CA 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Aprop. 
Costp 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Cost 
New Work Man. Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
66,617 1,009,500 100,099 
66,617 706,935 336,661 
1,031,000 2,114,700 
1,046,892 1,659,292 
- 585,000 
- 363,087 
557 666 
1,007,848 
583,000 
619,881 
21,099 3,663,839 32 
87,102 3,663,839 32 
- 1,369,372 2a 3340 
- 1,369,372 28 3340 
1,137,200 
1,132,458 
594,000 
749,534 
104,684 823,000 (412,942) (52,369) 
420,311 476,550 (66,492) (52,369) 
42,917,509 34 40 
42,899,943 3440o 
1,762,000 
1,732,502 
32,359 40o4 7 
32,359 40 47 
4,971,160 40o 46 
4,971,160 404o6 
- 4,126,808 52 
- 4,126,808 52 
- 160,000 3 
- 160,000 3 
5,527 17,918 
5,527 17,918 
- 375,000 
- 191,117 
63,062 
62,524 
4,000,000 
1,687,973 
538 
1,657,500 
1,756,545 
410,000 
396,222 
662,917 488,000 1,276,542 598,500 
623,374 508,037 826,455 1,048,062 
78,810 
85,028 
9,709,988 40o53 
9,709,988 4053 
6,032,500 
3,635,635 
410,000 
396,222 
200,928 36 
200,928 36 
7,787,204 3740 
7,760,568 3s40 
217,677 38 
217,677 38 
2,717,028 39 
2,717,028 9 
1. Includes $641 800 for jetties, bulkheads, 
main Bodega Bay dhannel and .turning basin 
completed in 1943. 
2. Includes $585,000 for Preconstruction 
Planning ($456,000 Construction, General funds 
and $129,000 General Investigation funds). 
3. Includes $585,000 Preconstruction Planning 
costs ($456,000 Construction General costs and 
$129,000 General Investigation costs). 
4. Includes $658 746 for reconnaissance and 
condition surveys, I'Y 1956-1995. Excludes 
contribution funds of $385,134. 
5. Excludes contribution funds of $2 000 
6. Excludes contributed funds of $271,116 and 
$2,138 surplus material from Corps military 
activities. 
7. Excludes contributed funds of $44,340. 
Includes $219,934 for reconnaissance and condition 
surveys FY 1956-1995. 
8. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds in lieu of 
royalty-free rock. 
9. Includes $2,261,371 for previous project. 
Excludes $95,000 contributed funds for existing 
project. 
34-11 
1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) 
10. Includes $98,206 for previous project and 
$26,457 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, 
FY 1956-1995. 
11. Excludes $5 337 previous project costs. 
12. Excludes $$,539 surplus material from 
Corps' military activities. Includes $240,236 for 
reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 
1956-1995. Excludes contributed funds of 
$180 200. 
13. Excludes previous project costs. 
14. Includes $845 247 for reconnaissance and 
condition surveys, PY 1956-1995. Excludes 
$492,788 contributed funds. 
15. Includes $11,985 for previous project. 
Excludes $7,180 contributed funds for previous 
project. 
16. Includes $3 678 000 for Preconstruction 
Planning ($3,098,060 for Breakwater of which 
$500,000 allocated under Construction, General 
and $2 598,000 under General Investigations); 
($580,060 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 
allocated under Construction, General and 
$415 000 under General Investigations). 
1'. Includes $3,667,531 Preconstruction cost 
($3 087 531 for Breakwater of which $500,000 was 
under donstruction, General and $2,587,531 under 
General Investigations); ($580 000 for Channel 
Extension of which $165 600 was under 
Construction, General and $415,000 under General 
Innv1es8t.ig Iantciloundse)s. $32,097 for previous project and 
$75,078 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, 
FY 1956-1995. Excludes contributed funds of $820 
for previous project. 
19. Excludes contributed funds of $4,000 in lieu 
of providing dike disposal areas on existing project. 
20. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 
21. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. 
Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on previous 
projects. 
22. Includes $684,028 for previous projects and 
$59,179 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, 
FY 1956-1995. 
23. Includes $212,083 for previous project. 
Excludes contributed funds of $15,559 for previous 
project. 
24. Includes $314,692 for previous project and 
$253,523 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, 
FY 1956-1995. Excludes contributed funds of 
$192,424. 
25. Includes previous project costs $31,443. 
Excludes $119,572 contributed funds for existing 
project. 
26. Includes $537 759 for reconnaissance and 
condition surveys, FY' 1956-1995. 
27. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. 
Includes $105,000 Public Works Administration 
funds. 
28. Excludes modification authorized October 
27, 1965, under project "San Francisco Bay to 
Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship 
Channels)." 
29. Excludes $34,800 contributed funds. 
Includes $109,727for reconnaissance and condition 
surveys, FY 1956-1995. 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
30. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. 
Excludes $134,591 contributed funds for existing 
project. Includes $193,000 Public Works 
Administration funds. 
31. Includes $475,321 for previous projects and 
$813,611 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, 
FY 1956-1995. 
32. Authorized by FC Act of 1965 (Sec. 201); 
Maintenance R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes 
$321,488 for reconnaissance and condition surveys 
FY 1979-1995. See FY 1977 Annual Report for last 
full report. Excludes contributed funds of 
$879 454. 
33. Includes $1,086,703 for previous projects. 
34. Includes $1,359,380 for previous projects 
and $32 832 for reconnaissance and condition 
surveys IY 1956-1995. 
35. Excludes $810,046 contributed funds on 
previous project. 
36. See Sacramento District FY 1974 Annual 
Report for detail. 
37. Project maintenance responsibility to Point 
Edith was transferred to San Francisco District 
January 1, 1974. Excludes Sacramento District's 
portion. Includes $48,735 for reconnaissance and 
project condition surveys, FY 1976-1995. 
38. Project maintenance assigned to San 
Francisco District from Sacramento District 
January 1, 1974. See Sacramento District 1972 
Annual Report for full report. 
39. Includes $461203 for reconnaissance and 
condition surveys, FY 1978-1995. Includes 
$727,510 for previous project. Excludes $121,386 
contributed funds. 
40. See FY 1981 Annual Report for last full 
report. 
41. Excludes Contributed Funds of $709,624. 
42. See Sacramento District FY 1985 Annual 
Report for full report. 
43. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds and 
$105,000 contributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. 
44. See FY 1979 Annual Report for last full 
report. 
45. Includes $128 964 for reconnaissance and 
condition surveys, FY 1970-1995. 
46. Includes $245 752 for reconnaissance and 
condition surveys, IfY 1970-1995. Excludes 
$93,500 contributed funds. 
47. Excludes $41,094 contributed funds. 
48. Includes $9,199,000 funds of which 
$8,499,000 was under Construction, General and 
700 000 under General Investigations. 
49. Includes $9,199,000 costs of which 
$8,499,000 was under Construction, General and 
700 000 under General Investigations. 
56. See FY 1987 Annual Report for last full 
report. 
51. Includes $64 288 for reconnaissance and 
condition surveys FV 1989-1995. 
52. See FY 1488 Annual Report for last full 
report. 
53. Includes $60 851 for reconnaissance and 
condition surveys, FY 1993-1995. 
34-12

SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 34-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
1 n A TrT AIL T S DIATT*T'b ti A 
1. JettiLesA.J2u3n,e 1874 
June 23, 1874 Jetties. 
June 25, 191( 
Sep. 22, 1922 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Apr. 28, 1928 
July 3, 1930 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Aug. 8, 1917 
July 3, 1930 
) North channel in Brooklyn Basin, 25 feet deep, 
and tidal canal to 18 feet. 
Channel across shoal southeast of Yerba Buena 
Island and thence to Webster St.; South 
channel in Brooklyn Basin; Turning Basin at 
east end of BrookIyn Basin; and channel in 
Tidal Canal from Brooklyn Basin to Park St., 
30 feet deep. 
2 Channel from Webster St. to Brooklyn Basin, 
maintain area to within 75 feet of pierhead 
line south of channel from Harrison St. to 
Harbor Line Point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; 
dredge a triangular strip about 2,700 feet long 
and maximum width of 300 feet at western 
end of Brooklyn Basin, 30 feet deep. 
Local cooperation requirements modified to 
provide alteration or replacement of bridges by 
local interests shall apply only to that feature of 
project covering deepenmng tidal canal to 25 feet. 
Drawbridges across Tidal Canal were required by 
1882 Decree of Court in condemnation proceedings 
whereby title was obtained to rightof-
way for tidal canal. 
Entrance channel to outer harbor, 800 to 600 
feet wide. 
Eliminated requirement that local interests contribute 
10 cents per cubic yard toward deepening 
tidal canal. 
Maintenance of 35-foot depth in channel to outer 
harbor and in outer harbor channel and turning 
basin. 
s Deepen inner harbor 35-foot channels and lower 
1,300 feet of north channel in Brooklyn Basin 
to 35 feet. 
Deepen Inner and Outer Harbor channels to 42 
feet. Widen entrance channel to 11000 feet; 
relocate Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet 
westward and widen turning basin to 1800 feet. 
Construct 1,200 foot turning basin in Inner 
Harbor. 
RICHMOND HARBOR CA 
Channel 24 feet deep and 600 feet wide from San Francisco Bay to Ellis Slough (Santa Fe Channel); 
a turning basin at Point Potrero; a training wall. 
A 30-foot channel with lessened widths; a turning 
basin at head of navigation. 
Aug. 30, 1935 4 Increase project widths in inner harbor, maintenance of Santa Fe channel to 30 feet; approach areas 
in outer harbor to 32 feet. 
Annual Report, Part II, 
1874, p. 378. 
H. Doc. 647, 61st 
Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 144, 67th 
Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 407, 69th 
Cong., 1st sess.1 
Public Res. 28, 
70th Cong. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 43, 
71st Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 466, 77d 
Cong., 1st sess. 
Report on File in Office, 
Chief of Engineers 
H. Doc. 353, 87th 
Cong., 2d sess. 1 
1986 WRDA Public 
Law 99-662 
H. Doc. 515, 63rd 
Cong., 2d sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 16, 
70th Cong. 1st sess. 
Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 7, 
73d Cong. 1st sess., 
and 10, 7th Cong., 
1st sess. 
34-13 
2.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
June 20, 1938 Widen channel at Point Potrero and north thereof; H. Doc 598, 75th Cong., 
enlarge and maintain to 30-foot depth turning 3d sess. 
basin at Terminal No. 1. 
Mar. 2, 1945 Channel 20 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in San Pablo H. Doc. 715, 76th 
Bay north of Point San Pablo. Cong., 3d sess. 
Sep. 3, 1954 Channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide adjacent H. Doc. 395, 83rd 
to Southampton Shoal enlarge and deepen to 35 Cong., 2d sess. 1 
feet approach area to Richmond Long Wharf; 
widen and deepen inner harbor and entrance 
channels; deepen turning basin at Point Richmond 
and southerly 2,000 feet of Santa Fe Channel. 
Eliminate restriction that widening north of 
Point Potrero will not be undertaken until local 
interests furnish assurances industries will avail 
themselves of improved navigation facilities. 
and reclamation of Reservation Point. 
Oct. 27, 1965 West Richmond channel 45 feet deep, 600 feet H. Doc. 208, 89th 
wide; enlarge and deepen to 45 feet maneuvering Cong., 1st sess. i 
area at Richmond Long Wharf (Sacramento Dist. 
'San Francisco Bay to Stockton Calif. (John 
F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship (hannels)"). 
Nov. 17, 1986 Deepen channel to 38 feet between Richmond 1986 WRDA, Public 
Long Wharf and Santa Fe Channel. Construct Law 99-662 
1,200 feet turning basin. 
4. SONOMA BAYLANDS WETLANDS DEMONSTRATION 
PROJECT, CA 
Oct. 5, 1992 Restoration of tidal wetland on a 348-acre site using Section 106 
dredged material and construction of a replacement 1992 WRI$A, 
levee around the landward periphery of the site. Public Law 102-580 
1. Contains latest published map. 
2. Included deepening of tidal canal above 
Park Street Bridge to 25 feet, which was 
deauthorized November 6 1977. 
3. Reconstruction of i'ruitvale Avenue 
Highway Bridge (S. Doc. 75, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) 
which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 
4. Included in part in Public Works 
Administration Program, September 6, 1933. 
34-14

SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 34-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to Sep. 30 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Berkeley Harbor, CA 1 Completed 1966 $ 155,550 2 $20,309 9 
Berkeley Marina, CA ' Completed 1979 505,201 3 
Monterey Harbor, CA Completed 1971 1,108,182 4 1,763,135 * 
San Francisco Harbor (Islais 
Creek), CA Completed 1976 848,227 7 74,778 1 
San Francisco Marina (Gas 
House Cove) CA Completed 1974 180,472 6 88,174 1o 
San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), 
CA' 1 Completed 1976 210,390 8 - 
Sausalito Canal, Richardson 
Bay, CA Inactive 1963 103,095 70,165 
1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107, 6. Includes preauthorization costs $26,855 and 
Public Law 86-645). excludes contributed funds $153,618. 
2. Excludes $155,551 contributed funds. 7. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. 
3. Excludes $378 989 contributed funds. 8. Includes $72000 preauthorization costs and 
4. Includes $207 800 Public Works excludes contributed funds $138,189. 
Administration funds and breakwater . 9. Includes $20,309 for jetty condition surveys 
modifications (1960 Act) placed inactive 1974. The for FY 1987-1995. 
barrier groin and sandtrap feature of the project 1Q. Includes $88 174 for reconnaissance and 
wofa 1s 9d8e6a. uthorized November 17, 1986, by WRDA condition survey for 'Y 1990-1995. 11. Includes $74 778 for reconnaissance and 
5. Includes $308 901 for reconnaissance and condition survey for ?Y 1994-1995. 
condition survey for FY 1956-1995. 
TABLE 34-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Date Funds Funds 
Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Humboldt Bay (Buhne Point), CA 1958 Jan. 1, 1990 $ 2,000 - 
Lower San Francisco Bay, CA 1935 Jan. 1, 1990 -- 
Knights Valley Lake, R.R. 
Basin, CA 1974 Aug. 5, 1977 -- 
Oakland Harbor, CA (Deepen 
Tidal Canal) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 -- 
Oakland Harbor, CA (Fruitvale 
Avenue Bridge) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 -- 
San Lorenzo Creek, CA 
(Upper Portion) 1962 Nov. 6, 1977 -- 
San Pablo Bay and Mare 
Island Strait, CA (Approaches 
to Vallejo and South Vallejo) 1982 Nov. 6, 1977 - 
Santa Cruz County, CA 1966 Jan. 1, 1990 245,639 - 
34-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 34-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(See Section 10 of Text) 
Location Dates of Inspection 
Corte Madera Creek Aug 1995 
Coyote Creek Aug 1995 
East Weaver Creek Sep 1995 
Eel River at Sandy Prairie Sep 1995 
Guadalupe River Sep 1995 
Klamath River Sep 1995 
Mad River at Blue Lake Mar 1995 
Pajaro River, Monterey County Jul 1995 
Pajaro River, Santa Cruz County Jul 1995 
Pinole Creek Sep 1995 
Redwood Creek Jul 1995 
Rheem Creek Jul 1995 
Rodeo Creek May 1995 
San Pablo Creek Aug 1995 
Uvas Creek Sep 1995 
Wildcat Creek Aug 1995 
34-16

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT *
This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and 
San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; 
Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake 
and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of 
Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, 
and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado 
River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, 
eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona, and western 
Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. Sacramento River, CA ............... 35-2 
2. Sacramento River Deep Water 
Ship Channel, CA...................35-3 
3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA 
(John F. Baldwin and Stockton 
Ship Channels) .................... 35-3 
4. San Joaquin River, CA ............... 35-4 
Flood Control 
5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, 
Chowchilla River, CA ................ 35-5 
6. Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA ........ 35-6 
7. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and 
tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and 
Farmington Dam, CA ................ 35-6 
8. Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO. . 35-7 
9. Corte Madera Creek, CA ............. 35-8 
10. Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, CA....... 35-9 
11. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA .......... 35-9 
12. Guadalupe River, CA ............... 35-10 
13. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno 
River, CA.......................35-11 
14. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA ........ 35-11 
15. Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including 
Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA. .. 35-13 
16. Little Dell Lake, UT............... . 35-14 
17. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, 
NV and CA ...................... 35-15 
18. Merced County Streams............. 35-15 
19. Merced County Stream Group, CA ..... 35-16 
20. Pajaro River, CA...................35-16 
21. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA. ... 35-17 
22. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA ..... 35-18 
23. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek 
(Warm Springs Lake) and Lake 
Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA.. 35-19 
24. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA 
from Collinsville to Shasta Dam ........ 35-20 
25. Walnut Creek, CA ................. 35-22 
26. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA ..... 35-22 
27. Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Projects..................35-23 
Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 
28. Flood Control Work under Special 
Authorization ..................... 35-24 
29. Scheduling Flood Control 
Reservoir Operations ............... 35-24 
Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 
30. New Melones Lake, CA.............. 35-24 
General Investigations 
31. Surveys......................... 35-25 
32. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 35-26 
33. Research and Development .......... 35-26 
34. Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 35-26 
35. Other Work under Special Authority... 35-26 
Tables Page 
Table 35-A Cost and Financial 
Statement...............35-28 
Table 35-B Authorizing 
Legislation..............35-36 
Table 35-C Other Authorized 
Navigation Projects ....... 35-38 
Table 35-D Not Applicable 
Table 35-E Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects .......... 35-39 
Table 35-F Not Applicable 
Table 35-G Deauthorized Projects ..... 35-41 
Table 35-H Sacramento River, CA: 
Tidal and Flood Conditions 
Prevailing...............35-41 
Table 35-I San Joaquin River, CA: 
Total Cost of New Work 
for Project .............. 35-42 
Table 35-J San Joaquin River, CA: 
Project Units (1950 Modification) 
Reclassified and Excluded from 
Project Cost ............. 35-42 
Table 35-K Merced County Stream Group, 
CA, Maximum Inflow, Storage, 
and Outflow for Projects . . .35-43 
Table 35-L Russian River Basin, CA: Estimated 
Cost for New Work ....... 35-43 ,t 
35-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
IMPROVEMENTS (Cont'd) 
Tables 
Table 35-M 
Table 35-N 
Table 35-0 
Page Tables 
Russian River Basin, CA: 
Project Features and 
Estimated Costs.......... 35-44 
Sacramento River and 
Tributaries, CA, Collinsville 
to Shasta Dam: Project Units 
Units Reclassified and Excluded 
from Cost Estimate ....... 35-44 
Sacramento River and 
Tributaries, CA, from Collinsville 
Table 35-P 
Table 35-Q 
Page 
to Shasta Dam: Construction 
Accomplished and Contract 
Costs.................. 35-45 
Flood Control Work Under 
Special Authorization Flood 
Control Activities Pursuant 
to Section 205, Public Law 
80-858, as Amended 
(Preauthorization) ........ 35-45 
Surveys ............... .35-46 
Navigation 
1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA 
Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in 
north-central California, flows generally southerly 
about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm 
of San Francisco Bay, at Collinsville, CA. (See 
Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento 
Valley, CA.) 
Previous projects. For details see page 1985 of 
Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual 
Report for 1938. 
Existing project. For description of Sacramento 
Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 
1969. Total first cost for completed portion was 
$43,932,558 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), 
$300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non-Federal 
for lands and damages, including relocations) 
and excludes local interests cost $10,741,000 (June 
1963) for 30-foot deep water ship channel and 
13-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal 
facilities required under terms of project authorization. 
Project also provided for a shallow-draft 
channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 
200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to 
Sacramento, CA, 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low 
water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a 
depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and 
Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as 
practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 
53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. However, 
shallow-draft channel feature Colusa to Red Bluff 
(including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 miles and 
Chico Landing to Red Bluff. 53 miles) was 
deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development 
Act on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662). 
(See table 35-H on tidal and flood conditions 
prevailing.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep 
water ship channel project. None required on 
shallow-draft feature. 
Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and docks at 
Port of Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are 
open-pile structures with timber decks, some of 
which are designed to meet extreme high waters of 
flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have 
rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned 
by city of Sacramento and remainder by private 
interests; all are privately operated. For full 
description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the 
Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and 
Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities 
comprise wharves and piers, administration and 
storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority 
of these facilities are owned and operated by 
Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are 
privately owned and operated. Facilities are 
considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work, Deep 
Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow 
Draft Channel: Maintenance and operation activities 
continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream 
to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: 
Maintenance and operation activities continued. 
Historical summary. Construction of 7-foot 
shallow-draft channel below Sacramento was initiated 
in September 1899 and completed in 1904. 
Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to 
Sacramento was initiated in FY 1928 and completed 
in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento 
was begun in April 1946 but new work was 
discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In 
February 1974, remaining work for shallow-draft 
portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth 
between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was 
reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all 
year; however, there is no regular navigation above 
Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. On November 
17, 1986, remaining shallow-draft feature, Colusa to 
35-2

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 
miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was 
deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development 
Act (Public Law 99-662). Construction of 30-foot 
deep water ship channel was initiated in July 1949; 
improvement dredging by continuing contracts 
resulted in provision of an operational facility for 
oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Bascule bridge 
was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August 
1961, barge canal in November 1961, and entire 
deep water ship channel in June 1970. 
2. SACRAMENTO RIVER DEEP WATER 
SHIP CHANNEL, CA 
Location. On the Sacramento River between 
Collinsville and the Port of Sacramento, a distance of 
about 43 miles, in the counties of Sacramento, 
Contra Costa, Solano, and Yolo, CA. 
Existing project. Project provides for deepening 
to 35 feet the Suisun Bay and Sacramento River Deep 
Water Ship Channels from New York Slough to the 
Port of Sacramento, and the Avon to New York. 
Slough reach to 35 feet which will be accomplished 
under the San Francisco Bay to Stockton (John F. 
Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, and 
widening the channel as necessary. 
Current selected plan also provides for a water 
quality monitoring program, and establishment of 
wetland habitat and upland habitat to mitigate for 
losses of such habitat. 
Project estimate (October 1994) is $50,000,000 
(includes an allowance for estimated inflation 
through the construction period) comprising Federal 
cost (Corps) of $24,900,000; Federal cost (Coast 
Guard) for navigation aids $300,000; and non-Federal 
cost of $24,800,000 for lands and damages, 
relocations, and spoil retention dikes, including the 
cash contribution ($8,300,000) that local interests 
must pay. Existing project was adopted by 
Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985, August 
15, 1985 (Public Law 99-88), 99th Cong., 1st sess. 
and modified by 1986 Water Resources Development 
Act, November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) 
99th Cong., 2d sess. 
Local cooperation. Local interests, through a 
public body legally authorized and financially 
capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, 
easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material 
disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, 
roads, and other facilities where necessary in the 
construction of the project; and provide retention 
dikes for dredged material disposal area; and pay 25 
percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation 
during construction, presently estimated at 
$8,300,000. Local interests have agreed to make all 
required payments concurrently with project 
construction. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
(LCA) (sec. 221) was executed June 27, 1986. 
Construction has been delayed until local interests 
develop a financial plan to obtain non-Federal cash 
contribution. An LCA modification necessitated by 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was 
executed December 6, 1988. 
Terminal facilities. All main wharves at 
Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above 
facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and 
remainder by private interests; all are privately 
operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal 
Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, 
Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water 
terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, 
administration and storage buildings, and belt 
railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are 
owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port 
District; remainder are privately owned and 
operated. Facilities are considered adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Project coordination was continued. 
Historical summary. General Design Memorandum 
was approved and Record of Decision was 
signed in May 1987. Local Cooperation Agreement 
(LCA) modification was approved and was signed by 
Port of Sacramento on August 19, 1987. LCA 
modification was executed December 6, 1988. First 
construction contract was awarded February 2, 1989 
and completed in July 1990; second contract was 
awarded September 12, 1990 and completed in 
August 1991. 
3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, 
CA, (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND 
STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) 
Location. On navigation channels extending from 
entrance to San Francisco Bay to Port of Stockton 
through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, 
Solano, Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties. 
(See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 
5532-5534 for respective areas.) 
Existing project. Project provides for modification 
of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond 
Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, 
Suisun Bay Channel, and San Joaquin River 
navigation projects to provide depths of 55 feet for 
San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet for main internal 
bay channels upstream to vicinity of Avon, and 35 
feet from Avon to Stockton; enlargement and 
deepening to 45 feet of maneuvering areas adjacent 
to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel 
route; widening Suisun Bay Channel; reclaiming 
shoreline marshes and inundated or low-lying areas 
by spoil deposit for public recreation and for 
industrial use; providing basic recreation facilities on 
some of the reclaimed areas for public use; and 
placing additional rock revetment on waterside of 
levees bordering channels. 
35-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Project estimate (October 1994) is $202,300,000 
(includes an allowance for estimated inflation 
through the construction period) comprising Federal 
cost (Corps) of $172,250,000, including basic 
recreation facilities; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for 
navigation aids $780.000; and non-Federal cost of 
$29,270,000 for lands and damages, relocations, 
berthing areas, and spoil retention dikes, including 
the cash contribution ($20,000) that local interests 
must make for land enhancement at time of 
construction. Local interests must also pay, 
contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of 
separable cost of project allocated to recreation. 
Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and 
Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., 
contains latest published map). 
Local cooperation. Local interests, through a 
public body legally authorized and financially 
capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, 
easements, and rights-of-way for construction and 
future maintenance of the project and for aids to 
navigation, including spoil-disposal areas designated 
by the Chief of Engineers; provide necessary spoil 
retention dikes, bulkheads, and embankments 
except as applicable to spoil-disposal areas designated 
as public recreation areas; make utility 
modifications and relocations required for construction, 
including new bridges or bridge alterations 
(except for railroad bridges), and absorb any 
increased annual maintenance and operation costs 
resulting there from; provide and maintain all 
necessary berthing areas, at a depth commensurate 
with project depth, at all terminals and wharves to be 
served by the deepened channels; and in recognition 
of the local land enhancement benefits to result from 
landfill during dredging, contribute to the United 
States 4 cents per cubic yard of all spoil material 
placed during initial construction for modification of 
Suisun Bay Channel project on areas not developed 
for public use. Local interests must also give 
satisfactory assurances, before starting construction 
of the affected units, that they will maintain and 
operate the Federally provided recreation areas and 
facilities, continue to maintain to adequate standards 
the levees altered, set back or provided revetment 
protection, and hold the U.S. Government free from 
damages due to deposition of spoil and construction 
of new levees or reconstruction of existing levees. 
Local interests, represented by Board of Supervisors 
of Contra Costa County and Stockton Port District, 
must, at time of construction, contribute $20,000 in 
cash for land enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, 
or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of 
project allocated to recreation; and maintain and 
operate basic recreation facilities after construction 
and install additional basic facilities required as 
demands on area expand. No work shall be 
undertaken on a modification of Suisun Bay Channel 
project unit to deepen the channel to more than 35 
feet between Avon and a proposed refinery or 
manufacturing plant, until local interests furnish 
formal assurances and definite plans for such 
installation within the Avon-Chipps Island reach of 
channel. Also, no work shall be undertaken on 
modification of San Joaquin River navigation project 
unit, regarding access channels in vicinity of Antioch, 
until local interests furnish formal assurances and 
definite plans for Port of Antioch. Formal assurances 
for deepening and otherwise improving the Stockton 
Deep Water Ship Channel from Pittsburg to Stockton 
were furnished by Stockton Port District April 9, 
1970. The Stockton Port District, in August 1980, 
formally provided their intent to sponsor the Avon to 
Pittsburg reach (Suisun Bay Channel) and recreational 
development on Roberts Island. The Port of 
Stockton, by letter of October 20, 1981, stated that 
they would furnish the necessary assurances for fish 
and wildlife mitigation and enhancement, and on 
April 13, 1982, provided formal updated assurances 
for the Avon to Stockton portion. A sec. 221 
agreement satisfying all requirements of local 
cooperation for Southampton Shoal and Richmond 
Long Wharf maneuvering area was obtained from 
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and 
signed by District Engineer July 31, 1984. On May 3, 
1988, Board passed a resolution of continued 
support for construction in West Richmond, Pinole 
Shoal, Carquinez Strait, and Suisun Bay Channels. 
A Memorandum of Agreement between the 
Department of the Army, San Francisco District and 
Contra Costa County to sample berthing areas of 
project was executed September 12, 1989. 
Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, 
revised 1991, and 31, revised 1991, titled respectively: 
"The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, 
and Humboldt Bay, Calif." and "The Ports of 
Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Ports on 
Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and Port Series No. 32, 
revised 198 6,"The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, 
Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered 
adequate for existing commerce and will be 
adequate for future commerce upon completion of 
new terminal facilities. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Reported on by the San Francisco District. 
Historical summary. Construction of project was 
initiated in June 1971 and is about 37 percent 
complete. Suisun Bay Channel (Martinez to Point 
Edith) portion of project which had been placed in 
"deferred" status on November 16, 1989, was 
reclassified as "active" on August 24, 1993. Only 
Bulls Head Channel portion will be included as part 
of John F. Baldwin Ship Channel project. 
4. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA 
Location. Rises in east central California and 
flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to 
its confluence with Sacramento River at head of 
Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. 
Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 
miles from its mouth in Suisun Bay at Pittsburg to city 
of Stockton. Waterborne access to city provided by 
35-4

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
Stockton Channel, an artificial cut extending from 
river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic 
Survey Sheet 5527.) 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, 
see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-I for total 
cost of new work for project completed in May 
1960.) 
Projects units (1950 modification) reclassifed and 
excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-J. 
Modification of existing project is included as one 
unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA, (John F. 
Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, 
authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 
209, 89th Cong., 1st sess.); this modification is 
reported in detail under Sacramento District, 
Improvement No. 3 and San Francisco District, 
Improvement No. 3. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for 
completed portion of project; for details of required 
cash contributions on completed, inactive and 
deferred portions of project, see Existing project 
paragraph, Annual Report for 1967. 
Terminal facilities. For description of harbor 
facilities at Port of Stockton, CA, see Port Series 32, 
"The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and 
Antioch, Calif.," revised 1986. Downstream from 
Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings 
and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, 
where there are wharves for shallow- and deep-draft 
vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean 
terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present 
and immediate future. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous 
inspections and reports were accomplished by hired 
labor. Dredging was initiated and completed at 
contract cost of $499,999. (Repair or restoration of 
wavewash protection is required by legislation 
authorized by Improvement No. 3.) 
Historical Summary. Active portion of existing 
project was completed in May 1960. Construction of 
project was initiated in December 1877. 
Flood Control 
5. BUCHANAN DAM-H.V. EASTMAN 
LAKE, CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CA 
Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles 
above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city 
of Chowchilla, CA. (See Geological Survey 
quadrangles for area.) 
Existing project. Provides for construction of a 
205-foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with 
gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood 
control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. 
In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for 
about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel 
construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a 
project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second 
within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel 
improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and 
maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility 
of the Federal Government. Total first cost for 
existing project is $28,919,597, of which 
$27,369,597 is Federal cost, including $4,580,000 
for basic recreation facilities, and $1,550,000 
non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including 
relocations for downstream levee and channel 
improvements. Local interests have contracted with 
the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For 
future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local 
cooperation paragraph. 
Local interests have also, over a period of years, 
expended about $500,000 for construction of low 
levees and clearing downstream channels to provide 
some local flood protection in project area. This 
work is inadequate during major floods. Existing 
project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. 
Doc. 98, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest 
published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on 
Chowchilla River was designated "H.V. Eastman 
Lake" by Public Law 93-217. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and 
operation activities were continued. Dam safety 
assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost 
of $101,547. Runoff of Chowchilla River above 
Buchanan Dam was above normal for the year. 
Maximum storage of 144,167 acre-feet occurred 
June 4, 1995. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir 
was 20,086 cubic feet per second on March 11, 
1995. Maximum release of 1,559 cubic feet per 
second on March 23, 1995, was below maximum 
permissible flood release. During the year, a total of 
47,038 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation 
and other purposes. 
Historical summary. Construction began in July 
1971 and was completed in May 1979. Construction 
of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances 
was combined under one contract. Project was 
completed in September 1983, except for installation 
of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely). Dam 
closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in 
January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary 
marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation 
structure was completed in February 1976. Channel 
improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was 
completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I 
was completed in January 1976; Phase II was 
completed in February 1978. Residences, administration 
building, and visitors center contract was 
completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed 
35-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in 
April 1979. A resources interpretive display and road 
relocation were completed in FY 1982. Dam safety 
assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. Solar 
heating was installed at Chowchilla recreation area in 
FY 1984. An hydrilla eradication (spraying) program 
was initiated in FY 1989. Final land audit was 
approved on December 3, 1985. 
6. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA (CACHE 
CREEK SETTLING BASIN) 
Location. At the mouth of Cache Creek in Yolo 
County where it enters the Yolo Bypass about 2 miles 
east of city of Woodland and about 15 miles 
northwest of city of Sacramento, CA. 
Existing project. Provides for raising the 
perimeter levees of the existing settling basin an 
average of 12 feet, extending the levees upstream to 
County Road 102 to provide 50-year sediment 
storage capacity, enlarging and reconstructing the 
cobble weir, and degrading existing training levees 
and rebuilding them adjacent to western perimeter 
levee to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity 
(340 acre-feet annually.). Estimated cost (October 
1993) for existing project is $20,130,000 (includes 
an allowance for estimated inflation through the 
construction period), of which $11,710,000 is 
Federal and $8,420,000 is non-Federal (which 
includes $1,010,000 cash contribution). For future 
non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation 
paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 
99-662, November 17, 1986 (HD 98-134, 98th 
Cong., 1st sess., contains published map.) Project as 
authorized included development of a national 
wildlife refuge within the settling basin; however, the 
Department of the Army determined that such refuge 
would be more appropriately funded and developed 
by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Refuge 
feature was reclassified to deferred category on 
April 11, 1988. 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required 
to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and 
dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate 
buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad 
bridges) and other facilities where necessary in 
construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost 
allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal 
share of flood control costs to 25 percent of which 
S 1,010,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of 
operation, maintenance and replacement of flood 
control facilities. Local interests have agreed to 
make all required payments concurrently with 
project construction. Local Cooperation Agreement 
was executed March 12, 1990. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Engineering activities were continued. Cache Creek 
Settling Basin work was transferred to local interests 
for operation and maintenance in December 1993. 
Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement 
was executed March 12, 1990. Cache Creek 
Settling Basin enlargement (multicomponent) construction 
contract was awarded August 5, 1991, 
completed in September 1993, and work was 
transferred to local interests for operation and 
maintenance on December 2, 1993. 
7. CALAVERAS RIVER AND 
LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND 
TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING 
NEW HOGAN LAKE AND 
FARMINGTON DAM, CA 
Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River 
and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada 
and its foothills, flow easterly across flatlands of San 
Joaquin Valley and empty into San Joaquin River 
directly, or through various sloughs, in vicinity of 
Stockton, CA. Littlejohn Creek is in Calaveras, 
Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three 
principal stream systems of the group are, from south 
to north, Lone Tree Creek, Littlejohn Creek, and 
Duck Creek. Calaveras River group is in Calaveras 
and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams 
of the groups are, from south to north, Calaveras 
River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley 
Springs quadrangle for New Hogan reservoir area 
and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for 
Farmington reservoir area.) 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New 
Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel 
improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual 
Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost 
(July 1955) for project was $3,995,684, of which 
$3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal 
for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New 
Hogan: Federal cost for project is $15,906,150, 
including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For 
future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local 
cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation 
facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is 
$897,742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is 
$6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, 
including reimbursement ($488,096) to local interests 
of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, 
rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated 
Federal construction cost in accordance with section 
3, Public Law 738, 74th Congress. Non-Federal cost 
included in above amount is $3,242,867 for 
relocations and lands and damages, exclusive of 
above Federal reimbursement. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New 
Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost 
and annual operation and maintenance costs 
allocated to conservation functions of project. These 
costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 
percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests 
contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of 
which was $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, 
an interim contract between the Bureau of 
35-6

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
Reclamation and local water users provided for 
storage and payment of irrigation water; a long-term 
contract between that agency and local water users 
was executed August 25, 1970. Local interests paid 
$4,204,660 through December 31, 1994. A 
concessionaire at New Hogan Marina provided 
public use facilities in accordance with lease 
agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an 
estimated cost to date of $234,000. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: New Hogan Lake, regular funds: None. Code 
710 funds: None. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: 
None. Maintenance: Farmington Dam-Maintenance 
and operation activities continued; structures 
were maintained in serviceable condition. During 
rainflood season, maximum flow of Duck Creek 
Diversion was 770 cubic feet per second on March 
10, 1995. Maximum flow of Littlejohn Creek at 
Farmington was 1,899 cubic feet per second on 
January 29, 1995. Maximum storage in reservoir was 
21,936 acre-feet on January 28, 1995, and 
maximum estimated inflow to reservoir was 12,281 
cubic feet per second on March 10, 1995. Maximum 
release of 1,962 cubic feet per second on January 29, 
1995, was below maximum permissible flood release. 
During the year, 115,112 acre-feet was released for 
flood control. New Hogan Lake--Maintenance and 
operation activities continued. Dam safety assurance 
studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of 
$57,775. Structures were maintained in serviceable 
condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New 
Hogan was above normal for the year. Maximum 
storage of 298,387 acre-feet occurred May 23, 1995. 
Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 19,616 
cubic feet per second on March 10, 1995. Maximum 
release of 2,160 cubic feet per second on March 25, 
1995, was below maximum permissible flood release. 
During the year, 117,444 acre-feet was released for 
irrigation and other purposes. Release for flood 
control purposes amounted to 40,997 acre-feet. 
Historical summary. Farmington Dam: Construction 
of Farmington project was initiated in July 
1949 and completed for beneficial flood control 
operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement 
was completed in November 1951; and channel 
improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was 
completed in May 1955. There are no recreation 
facilities or public-use areas. All work completed. 
Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 
1982. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated 
May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, 
project completed for operational use in June 1964, 
and all work completed October 1973. Recreation 
facilities have been provided from Code 710 
appropriations. Seepage measurement weir 
constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance 
studies were initiated in FY 1980. Bear Creek, San 
Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 
and was completed in June 1967. Final cash 
contribution was made to local interests December 
23, 1970. Solar heating was installed at recreation 
facilities in FY 1984. A cultural resources survey was 
completed in FY 1984. 
8. COLORADO RIVER AT GRAND 
JUNCTION, CO 
Location. On north bank of Colorado River from 
9th Street west to the Denver Rio Grande Western 
Railroad Bridge at city of Grand Junction, CO, in 
Mesa County. 
Existing project. Provides for construction of a 
3,200 foot levee located on north side of Colorado 
River, one road ramp over levee for accessing 
Watson Island, 3 detention basins, a relief well 
system and a 550-foot-long impermeable blanket to 
prevent seepage though railroad embankment. 
Estimated cost (September 1994) is $1,651,200, of 
which $1,086,700 is Federal cost and $564,500 is 
non-Federal cost for lands and damages and 
includes a cash contribution of $63,000. Existing 
project was approved by Chief of Engineers on 
February 28, 1994, under provisions of section 205, 
1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 
Local cooperation. Local sponsor shall furnish to 
the Government all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, 
including suitable borrow and dredged material 
disposal areas, as determined by the Government to 
be necessary for construction, operation, and 
maintenance of the project, and shall furnish to the 
Government evidence supporting local sponsor's 
legal authority to grant rights-of-entry to such lands. 
Necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way may 
be provided incrementally, but all lands, easements, 
and rights-of-way determined by the Government to 
be necessary for work to be performed under a 
construction contract must be furnished prior to 
advertisement of the construction contract. 
Local sponsor shall provide or pay to the 
Government the cost of providing all retaining dikes, 
wasteweirs, bulkheads, and embankments, including 
all monitoring features and stilling basins that may be 
required at any dredged material disposal areas 
necessary for project construction. 
Upon notification from the Government, local 
sponsor shall accomplish or arrange for accomplishment 
at no cost to the Government all relocations 
(excluding railroad bridges and approaches thereto) 
determined by the Government to be necessary for 
project construction. 
Local sponsor shall comply with all applicable 
provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and 
Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 
Public Law 91-646, as amended by Title IV of the 
Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation 
Assistance Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-17), and 
the Uniform Regulations contained in 49 CFR Part 
24, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way 
for construction and subsequent operation and 
35-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
maintenance of the project, and inform all affected 
persons of applicable benefits, policies, and 
procedures in connection with said Act. Local 
sponsor shall provide such documentation as 
contracting officer requires to demonstrate compliance. 
The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) between 
the Department of the Army and the City of 
Grand Junction, CO, was signed April 8, 1994. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans 
and specifications were completed in August 1994. 
Non-Federal cash contribution of $63,000 for 
construction was received September 27, 1994. First 
construction contract in amount of $575,830 was 
awarded September 30, 1994. 
Historical summary. First construction contract 
in amount of $575,830 was awarded September 30, 
1994. 
9. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA 
Location. Creek and tributaries drain an area of 
28 square miles in Marin County, CA, and flow into 
west side of San Francisco Bay about 9 miles north of 
Golden Gate. (See Geological Survey quadrangle 
San Rafael.) 
Existing project. Provided for about 11 miles of 
channel improvements, including realignment, enlargement, 
levees, riprap, rectangular concrete 
sections, interior drainage facilities, bridge relocations, 
and debris removal on Corte Madera Creek 
and lower reaches of its tributaries, and a continuous 
channel rights-of-way to deep water in San 
Francisco Bay reserved to assure channel outlet in 
the event of future tideland reclamation. Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 modified 
existing project to direct construction of Unit 4 from 
Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake 
Boulevard, and to include construction of 
floodproofing measures as necessary to individual 
properties and other necessary structural measures in 
vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper 
functioning of completed portions of authorized 
project. Portion of project upstream of Sir Francis 
Drake Boulevard previously classified inactive was 
modified on November 17, 1986 to eliminate any 
channel modification. Current project has 3 miles of 
channel enlargement and levees, about 1.8 miles of 
rectangular concrete channel improvements, and 
450,000 cubic yards of redredging on lower Corte 
Madera Creek. Approved estimated cost for new 
work in Unit 4 and previously constructed features 
(October 1991) is $33,660,000, of which 
S18.330.000 is Federal cost and $15,330,000 is 
non-Federal cost (includes $760,000 to be contributed 
by local interests.) (See table 35-B for 
authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests must provide 
lands and rights-of-way, including suitable areas for 
disposal of waste material, modify or relocate all 
bridges and utilities necessary for construction and 
maintenance; hold and save the United States free 
from damages due to the construction works; 
maintain and operate the project after completion in 
accordance with the regulations prescribed by the 
Secretary of the Army, and prevent encroachment 
on flood channels that would result in decreasing the 
effectiveness of project for flood control; adjust all 
claims regarding water rights that might be affected 
by the project; and contribute in cash 1.5 percent of 
Federal construction cost of Ross Valley units 1-3 
and tidal areas. Construction of Unit 4 and 
modifications to completed portions of the project, as 
authorized under WRDA 86, would be subject to 
cash contribution and 5 percent. Marin County 
Flood Control and Water Conservation District 
previously furnished resolution of local assurances 
dated March 29, 1966, March 28, 1967, August 15, 
1967, and July 8, 1969, and Marin County Board Qf 
Supervisors reaffirmed by letter dated September 28, 
1978. Project was authorized by the State of 
California by 1965 Statute, Chapter 1388. Board of 
Supervisors of Marin County Flood Control and 
Water Conservation District furnished assurances of 
willingness and ability to meet requirements for 
portion of project below Sir Francis Drake 
Boulevard. 
On December 13, 1983, Marin County Board of 
Supervisors reconfirmed assurances of local cooperation 
because a Superior Court Judgment ordered that 
county to take all steps required by law to complete 
channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard 
(Unit 4) and maintain entire project as agreed. A 
Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging the 
lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed on 
June 29, 1985. Marn County also provided support 
for Ross Valley Unit 4 by resolution on March 24, 
1987 and by the resolution on September 13, 1988. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Minor coordination on a future plan to 
complete the project. All other work was suspended 
pending coordination with local communities on 
selection of a plan to complete the project. 
Historical summary. Project responsibility was 
transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 
1982. Project is about 77 percent complete 
considering the portion being held in abeyance 
upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. Work 
remaining: Design construction of the remaining 
3,000 feet of channel downstream of Sir Francis 
Drake Boulevard and Ross Creek. In lieu of the 
authorized concrete channel, an alternative plan 
consisting of wing walls and individual house 
floodproofing is being recommended in the Significant 
Post-Authorization Change Report. The portion 
of Corte Madera Creek upstream of intersection of 
Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Corte Madera 
Creek in Ross, near the city of San Anselmo, was 
35-8

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
classified as "inactive" on July 11, 1984, due to lack 
of local support. A Local Cooperation Agreement for 
redredging lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was 
executed June 29, 1985. Construction on Lower 
Corte Madera Creek Channel was completed and 
transferred to Manin County Flood Control and 
Water Conservation District by letter of May 28, 
1987. San Francisco District monitors maintenance 
and operation of the project. 
10. COYOTE CREEK, CA (KNOWN AS 
COYOTE AND BERRYESSA CREEKS) 
Location. Project is located in the cities of San 
Jose and Milpitas immediately south of San 
Francisco Bay in Santa Clara County, CA. 
Existing project. Plan of improvement on Coyote 
Creek consists of overflow channels and offset 
levees. Improvement on Berryessa Creek includes 
two sedimentation basins at the upstream end of the 
concrete lined trapezoidal channel and offset levees. 
Combined plan would provide flood protection from 
Coyote and Berryessa Creeks to cities of San Jose 
and Milpitas, which include large industrial complexes 
and some residential development. Estimated 
cost (October 1995) for the Coyote Creek element of 
the existing project is $61,290,000 (includes an 
allowance for estimated inflation through the 
construction period), of which $30,800,000 is 
Federal and $30,490,000 is non-Federal (which 
includes $30,050,000 cash contribution). For future 
non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation 
paragraph. Estimated cost (October 1995) for 
the Berryessa Creek element of the existing project is 
$17,550,000 (includes an allowance for estimated 
inflation through the construction period), of which 
$13,200,000 is Federal and $4,350,000 is non-Federal 
(which includes $2,140,000 cash contribution). 
Existing project was authorized under Section 
101(a) (5) of WRDA 1990, Public Law 101-640 (HD 
101-126, 101st Cong., 2d sess.). 
Local cooperation. (Coyote Creek) Local 
interests are required to provide lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, and borrow and excavated or dredged 
material disposal areas, which may be reduced for 
credit allowed based on prior work (Sec. 104 of 
WRDA 86 ($8,633,000), Sec. 26 of WRDA 88 (not 
to exceed $3,000,000) and Sec. 215 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1968 (not to exceed $3,000,000) 
after reductions for such credit have been made in 
the required cash payments; modify or relocate 
utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and 
other facilities, and perform prior work under Sec. 
104 of WRDA 86, Sec. 26 of WRDA 88, and Sec. 
215 of the Flood Control Act of 1968, where 
necessary for the construction of the project; and pay 
5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control, and 
bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, 
rehabilitation and replacement of flood control 
facilities. Local interests will receive an estimated 
Federal reimbursement of $8,540,000 for one-half 
of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in 
excess of Federal costs (Sec. 103 of WRDA 86). 
(Berryessa Creek) Local interests are required to 
provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow 
and excavated or dredged material disposal areas; 
modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except 
railroad bridges), and other facilities, where 
necessary in the construction of the project; and pay 
12 percent of the costs allocated to flood control to 
bring the total non-Federal share of flood control 
costs to 25 percent, and bear all costs fo operation, 
maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement 
of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor 
has also agreed to make all required payments 
concurrently with project construction. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Levee and channel improvement Contract 3B, 
Coyote Creek continued at fiscal year cost of 
$1,363,899. Local sponsor applied and received 
credit payment of $3,000,000 for construction of 
Coyote Creek Reach 2 integral work under Sec. 26 of 
WRDA 88. Payment of $1,800,000 was made to 
local sponsor as partial reimbursement for one-half 
of the non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in 
excess of Federal costs. 
Historical summary. Separate General Design 
Memorandums were prepared forCoyote and 
Berryessa Creeks. General Design Memorandum for 
Coyote was submitted in May 1993. Local interests 
have completed construction of Reach 1 (sec 104, 
Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), Reach 
2 (sec 26, WRDA) and Reach 3A (sec 215, WRDA). 
National Defense Authorization Act for FY 1994 
directed the Secretary of the Army to construct 
project notwithstanding sec 902, WRDA. Project 
Cooperation Agreement was executed in September 
1994 and Coyote Creek Reach 3B construction 
contract was awarded September 27, 1994. 
Preconstruction engineering and design cost is 
$4,410,000. Total reimbursement of $1,800,000 for 
costs in excess of 50% maximum requirement and 
credit payments of $11,633,000 for prior integral 
work, have been made to the local sponsor as of 
September 30, 1995. 
11. FAIRFIELD VICINITY STREAMS, CA 
Location. On five streams in vicinity of cities of 
Fairfield and Suisun, Solano County, CA. 
Existing project. Provides for channel improvement 
on Ledgewood, Laurel, and McCoy Creeks and 
diversion of three creeks upstream from Fairfield 
(Pennsylvania Avenue Creek into Ledgewood Creek, 
Union Avenue Creek into Laurel Creek, and Laurel 
Creek into McCoy Creek). Project related recreation 
facilities such as access roads, parking areas, a 
boat-launching ramp and hiking, bicycle, and 
horseback trails would also be constructed. Estimated 
cost (October 1993) for existing project is 
$39,420,000 (includes an allowance for estimated 
inflation through the construction period), of which 
35-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
5 14.770,000 is Federal and 524.650,000 is 
non-Federal (includes S595,000 cash contribution). 
For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local 
cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted 
by sec. 201. 1965 Flood Control Act (1970 Senate 
and House Public Works Committee resolutions) and 
Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 
(Public Law 99-190). December 19, 1985, and 
Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1987. (HD 
91-159. 91st Cong.. 1st sess., contains published 
map). 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required 
to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and 
dredged material disposal areas, modify or relocate 
buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except 
railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction 
of the project flood control features; pay one-half of 
the separable costs allocated to recreation, presently 
estimated at $595,000 (cash contribution); and bear 
all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement 
of flood control facilities and recreation facilities. 
Local interests have agreed to make all required 
payments concurrently with project construction. 
Project had been in "deferred" status since 
September 15, 1977. due to lack of local assurances. 
In April 1982, the cities of Fairfield and Suisun 
affirmed their support and intent to provide 
necessary assurances of local cooperation for a 
modified version of the authorized project from 
200-year to 100-year flood protection. On June 23, 
1982. project was reclassified from "deferred" to 
"active" status. The State of California Reclamation 
Board has provided a letter of intent to the Assistant 
Secretary of the Army, November 8, 1982, to 
cooperate with the Federal Government to begin 
construction of the project. In accordance with FY 
1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 
99-88) and sec. 117 of the Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 
99-190). a Local Cooperation Agreement for flood 
control and recreation (sec. 221) was executed 
June 3, 1986. 
Sec. 117 of Further Continuing Appropriations 
Act for FY 1986 contained the following authorization 
language which will be reflected in any future 
modified agreements: "The Secretary shall include as 
part of the non-Federal contribution of the project 
for flood control, Fairfield Vicinity Streams, 
California, authorized in accordance with sec. 201 of 
Flood Control Act of 1965, the cost of any work 
carried out by non-Federal interests on the project 
after December 31. 1973, and before the date of the 
enactment of this joint resolution if the Secretary 
determines such work is reasonably compatible with 
the project. Costs and benefits resulting from such 
work shall continue to be included for purposes of 
determining economic feasibility of the project." 
Prior local expenditures of S6,600,000 have been 
reported by the sponsor. The Corps is evaluating 
costs and benefits of all completed works by 
non-Federal interests after December 31, 1973. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance inspections of mitigation planting on 
Ledgewood Creek and project close-out activities 
were on-going. 
Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement 
was executed on June 3, 1986. Construction 
was initiated in October 1986. Enlargement of 
McCoy Creek and construction of Laurel Creek 
Diversion Channel, Phase I, was transferred to local 
interests in July 1987; Laurel Creek Diversion 
Channel, Phase II, was transferred to local interests 
in November 1988; Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, 
Phase III, was transferred to local interests in April 
1990; and Laurel Creek Diversion , Phase IIA, was 
transferred to local interests in December 1990 for 
maintenance. Channel improvement contract for 
Ledgewood Creek Channel, Phase IV, was completed 
and transferred to local interests in December 
1991 for maintenance. Mitigation planting on 
Ledgewood Creek was completed in April 1993. 
Maintenance inspection is continuing. Construction 
of Laurel Creek pedestrian bridge overcrossing was 
completed and transferred to local interests on 
July 8, 1993. 
12. GUADALUPE RIVER, CA 
Location. On Guadalupe River in downtown area 
of city of San Jose, Santa Clara County, CA. 
Existing project. Authorized plan provides for 
widening and deepening one or more sides of 
Guadalupe River for 2.5 miles from Interstate 
Highway 280 to Interstate Highway 880 in downtown 
San Jose, CA, and channel modifications with 
provisions for fish and wildlife mitigation, as 
necessary. Non-Federal sponsor must pay 100 
percent of incremental construction cost of locally 
preferred plan. Project is an integral component of a 
much larger regional park plan being undertaken by 
the San Jose Redevelopment Agency. 
Estimated cost (October 1994) is $137,770,000 
(which includes an allowance for estimated inflation 
through the construction period) of which 
$63,300,000 is Federal and $74,470,000 is 
non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation 
paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 and Energy and 
Water Development Appropriation Act of 1990 
which directed the Secretary of the Army to 
construct the project notwithstanding sec. 902 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 regarding 
project cost limitations. 
Local cooperation. Local interests, through a 
public body legally authorized and financially 
capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, 
easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material 
disposal areas, which are partially offset by a credit 
35-10

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
($5,701,000) allowed for prior work (sec. 104, 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986); credit 
was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army; 
modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges 
(except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where 
necessary in the construction of the project; pay 5 
percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and 
bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and 
replacement of flood control facilities. Federal 
reimbursement will be made to non-Federal sponsor 
for one-half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood 
control in excess of Federal costs. Local interests 
have agreed to make all required payments 
concurrently with project construction. 
On June 2, 1989, the local sponsor, the Santa 
Clara Valley Water District, expressed intent to 
provide all needed cost sharing funds. On September 
21, 1990, the San Jose Redevelopment Agency 
requested modification of project to include 
recreation facilities and confirmed that they intend to 
participate as local sponsor for recreation. Local 
Cooperation Agreements for both flood control and 
recreation were executed March 30, 1992. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Construction contract No. 1 for channel improvement 
(Highway 880 to Hedding Street) was finalized 
at fiscal year cost of $49,753, and was transferred to 
local interests for maintenance and operation on 
August 11, 1994. Construction contract No. 2 
(Hedding Street to Coleman Avenue), continued 
with fiscal year cost of $2,728,933. 
Historical summary. Final General Design 
Memorandum (GDM) reflecting locally preferred 
plan, was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the 
Army on March 26, 1992, with comments. Revision 
of GDM to address comments was completed in July 
1993. Local Cooperation Agreements for both flood 
control and recreation were executed March 30, 
1992. Construction contract No. 1 for channel 
improvement (Highway 880 to Hedding Street) was 
awarded August 10, 1992; and was essentially 
completed and transferred to local interests for 
maintenance and operation on August 11, 1994. 
Construction contract No. 2 (Hedding Street to 
Coleman Avenue) was awarded July 8, 1994. 
13. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, 
FRESNO RIVER, CA 
Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above 
its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera, 
CA (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) 
Existing project. Provides for construction of a 
163-foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with 
gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood 
control, irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In 
conjunction with the dam, the project provides for 
about 13 miles of downstream levee and channel 
improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream 
of Chowchilla Canal crossing to accommodate 
project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. 
Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is 
the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total 
first cost for existing project is $31,785,426, of which 
$30,555,426 is Federal cost, including $3,564,168 
for basic recreation facilities, and estimated 
$1,230,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages 
including relocations for downstream levee and 
channel improvements. Local interests have contracted 
with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation 
service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see 
Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have 
also, over a period of years, expended about 
$300,000 for construction of low levees and clearing 
downstream channels to provide some local flood 
protection in the project area. This work is 
inadequate during major floods. Existing project was 
adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 
87th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). 
Lake created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno 
River was designated "Hensley Lake" by Public Law 
93-603. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work. None. Maintenance: Maintenance and 
operation activities were continued. Dam safety 
assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost 
of $200,977. Runoff of Fresno River below Hidden 
Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum 
storage of 86,200 acre-feet occurred May 30, 1995. 
Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 21,517 
cubic feet per second on March 10, 1995. Maximum 
release of 3,124 cubic feet per second on March 12, 
1995, was above maximum permissible flood release. 
During the year, 62,372 acre-feet was released for 
irrigation and other purposes and 75,705 acre-feet 
was released for flood control. 
Historical summary. Construction began in July 
1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam 
closure was in March 1975; dam was completed 
November 1975. Instrumentation was completed in 
January 1976. Downstream channel improvement, 
Fresno River, was completed April 1976. Recreation 
areas: Phase I was completed in March 1976; Phase 
II was completed in June 1978. Residences, 
administration building, grounds, and utilities 
contract was completed in February 1978. Landscaping 
was completed in December 1978 and erosion 
control was completed in January 1979. Project was 
completed in September 1980. Final land audit was 
approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance 
studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer 
installation was completed in September 1982. Solar 
heating was installed at recreation areas in FY 1984. 
14. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CA 
Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of 
Bakersfield, CA, near confluence of north and south 
35-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half 
mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey 
quadrangles of area.) In 1991, Isabella Lake and 
16,000 acres of surrounding land was transferred to 
the Forest Service in exchange for about 2,500 acres 
of Forest Service land near Pine Flat Lake. 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report 
for 1967. Federal cost for new work is $22,027,452. 
For future non-Federal reimbursement see Local 
cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost 
funded from Code 710 appropriations is $2,199,085. 
Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is 
Federal responsibility. 
Local cooperation. California officially adopted 
project by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of 
California. Local interests, represented by North 
Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water 
Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, 
were required to reimburse the Federal Government 
the portion of first cost and annual operation and 
maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of 
project. These costs, based on a cost allocation study 
completed in December 1955, are $4,573,000 of first 
cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and 
maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, 
an interim contract between the Bureau of 
Reclamation and local water users provided for 
storage and payment of irrigation water. Under 
provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid 
$1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A 
long-term contract between the Bureau and local 
water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance 
due on allocated first cost of $4,573,000 was paid by 
the water users on March 31, 1965. Kern County 
assumed administration of recreation and development 
and maintenance of public use areas at project 
in accordance with a 25-year license February 15, 
1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for 
joint operation and development by the Corps and 
Kern County including permits granted to concessionaires 
by the county to provide certain services. As 
of September 30, 1971, Kern County relinquished all 
administration of recreation and development and 
maintenance of public use areas at the project. A 
State law permitting the Department of Boating and 
Waterways (known as the Department of Navigation 
and Ocean Development prior to January 1979) to 
participate in inland water development with Federal 
agencies was signed by the Governor on August 11, 
1972. Isabella Lake and surrounding land, 16,000 
acres around the lake currently being used for park 
and recreation purposes, was turned over to the 
Forest Service by the Corps on May 15, 1991, in 
exchange for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest 
Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. This 
was accomplished by using a memorandum of 
understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the 
Army and the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest 
Service). The MOU requires an exchange of land 
between departments. Three Corps maintenance 
employees, under supervision of the Success Lake 
park manager, will stay at Isabella to operate the dam 
for flood control and water conservation purposes. 
Authority for new concessionaire operating permits 
to be issued, as well as those previously granted by 
the Corps, will be transferred to the Forest Service. 
Total cost to date of present recreation facilities 
developed by the county and the marina concessionaires 
is about $965,000; $235,000 of this was a grant 
from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and 
about $534,000 is investment by marina 
concessionaires. 
Licenses. In accordance with Federal Power 
Commission Docket No. E-6578, issued April 1, 
1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal 
Government by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. 
($108,352) and Southern California Edison Co. 
($269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream 
existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits 
from April 15, 1954, to December 31, 1962. 
Between 1962 and 1982, the power companies have 
in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 
for headwater benefits. That amount was to be paid 
each year until changes in operation, development, 
or costs indicated some modification to be advisable. 
Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578 was 
revised by Docket No. HBO7-75-4-000 (order 
issued July 11, 1983 under 24 FERC, paragraph 
62052) which modified cumulative use charges after 
1974, effective retroactively. Such charges will now 
vary each year. An adjustment (years 1974 through 
1984) was included in 1984 payment of $244,790. 
The 1985 payment was $52,747; 1986 payment was 
$51,905. No payment was received in 1987. The 
1988 payment was $58,187. No payment was 
received in 1989. Two payments ($60,894 and 
$55,443) were received in 1990; $60,983 was 
received in 1991; $65,975 in October 1991 (FY 
1992) $77,577 in October 1992 (FY 1993), and 
$62,231 in October 1993 (FY 1994). Cumulative 
use charges collected by the Federal Power 
Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission since January 9, 1978) and 
returned to the U. S. Treasury through period ending 
September 30, 1995, amounted to $2,150,458. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. 
Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. 
Structures were maintained in good condition. 
Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Dam was above 
normal for the year. Maximum storage of 552,032 
acre-feet occurred July 19, 1995. Maximum hourly 
inflow to the reservoir was 8,650 cubic feet per 
second on June 29, 1995, and maximum outflow of 
3,764 cubic feet per second occurred August 8, 
1995. During the year, 989,386 acre-feet was 
released for irrigation and other purposes and 25,952 
acre-feet was released for flood control purposes. 
Historical summary. Construction began in 
March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main 
35-12

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, 
and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. 
Storage impoundment began December 1952. 
Piezometer was installed in August 1982. Project is 
operating to provide flood protection and irrigation 
benefits for which it was designed. Recreation 
facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam 
safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A 
cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 
On May 15, 1991, Isabella Lake and surrounding 
land, 16,000 acres around the lake currently being 
used for park and recreational purposes, was turned 
over to the Forest Service by the Corps in exchange 
for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service 
recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. A memorandum 
of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary 
of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest 
Service) was used. The MOU requires an exchange 
of land between departments. Three Corps 
maintenance employees, under supervision of the 
Success Lake park manager, will stay at Isabella to 
operate the dam for flood control and water 
conservation purposes. 
15. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, 
INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM 
AND SUCCESS LAKE, CA 
Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River 
about 20 miles east of Visalia, CA. Success Lake is 
on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, CA. 
(See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) 
Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description 
of completed improvement and authorizing act, see 
Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is 
$19,302,957, including $242,605 for basic recreation 
facilities and excluding spreading works 
constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 
1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works 
portion of project has been deauthorized. The 
90-day Congressional project review period, required 
by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, 
ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization 
of that portion of project. Federal cost of 
recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations 
is $700,004. Success Lake: For description 
of completion improvement and authorizing act, see 
Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work 
for Success Lake is $14,247,221, including $253,697 
for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of 
recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations 
is $747,048. For future non-Federal 
reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. 
Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal 
responsibility. 
Local cooperation. California officially adopted 
projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of 
California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are 
represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation 
District. Local interests for Success Lake are 
considered to be represented by the Vandalia, 
Porterville, and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, 
the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and 
Pioneer Water Co., which represent over 90 percent 
of irrigated land and water-right holders along Tule 
River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse 
the Federal Government the portion of first cost and 
annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to 
irrigation functions of projects. These costs are 
estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for 
Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and annual costs 
for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they 
will continue to operate and maintain spreading 
works and downstream channel systems to provide 
required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local 
interests for Success stated they will'continue to 
maintain downstream channel systems to provide 
required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. 
Repayment contracts between the Bureau of 
Reclamation and local water users for irrigation 
supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were 
executed January 11, 1965, and April 30, 1965, 
respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for 
irrigation storage as well as flood control and 
incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired 
water for recreation pools at the projects. Local 
interests paid the following total amounts for 
irrigation services from the reservoirs through 
December 31, 1994: Terminus, $2,180,708 and 
Success, $1,044,904. Tulare County was granted a 
25-year license for planning, development, and 
management of public recreation areas at Success, 
July 10, 1960, and at Terminus, June 5, 1961. Basic 
public-use facilities constructed by Corps at the 
Success reservoir were transferred to jurisdiction of 
Tulare County on January 18, 1962; facilities at 
Terminus were transferred June 20, 1962. In March 
1967, an amendment to the license agreements was 
approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. 
Under these amended licenses, Tulare County 
retained administration of only specified land areas 
and operation and maintenance of recreation 
facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued 
their program of water safety, boat inspection, and 
law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took 
over the administration of the remainder of the 
project land areas and the operation and maintenance 
of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. 
Department of Fish and Game expended funds to 
improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. 
As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all 
planning, development, and management of public 
recreation areas at Terminus Dam. Tulare County by 
expenditure of county funds and by a lease to a 
marina concessionaire has aided in the development 
of recreation facilities at an estimated cost of 
$199,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game 
expended funds in conjunction with Tulare 
Sportsman's Council and developed a habitat for 
upland game birds at Success Lake. As of April 1, 
1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, 
development, and management of public recreation 
areas at Success Lake, except for the Bartlett Park 
recreation area. Tulare County has aided in 
35-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
development of recreation facilities. Total cost to 
date of present recreation facilities developed by the 
county ($360.000) and the marina concessionaires 
($373,000) is about $733,000. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 
710 funds: None. 
Success Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 
funds: None. 
Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance and 
operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies 
were continued at a fiscal year cost of $7,714. 
Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. 
Runoff of Kaweah River above Terminus Dam was 
above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 
143,652 acre-feet occurred on June 29,1995. 
Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir on March 
11, 1995, was about 12,741 cubic feet per second. 
Maximum outflow of 4,559 cubic feet per second 
occurred June 29, 1995. Irrigation and spreading 
releases totaled 833,903 acre-feet. Releases for flood 
control totaled 20,843 acre-feet. Success Lake: 
Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety 
assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost 
of $765,469. Structures were maintained in 
serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above 
Success Dam was above normal during the year. 
Maximum storage of 82,512 acre-feet occurred on 
June 12, 1995. Maximum hourly inflow to the 
reservoir was 8,425 cubic feet per second on March 
11, 1995, and maximum outflow of 808 feet per 
second occurred on March 15, 1995. Irrigation and 
spreading releases amounted to 194,868 acre-feet. 
Releases for flood control amounted to 23,612 
acre-feet. 
Historical summary. Terminus Dam: Construction 
of project began in July 1957 and was completed 
in June 1968. Final land audit was approved on April 
20, 1987. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, 
initiated in February 1959, was completed in 
June 1962. Dam has been operating since November 
1961 to provide flood protection for which it was 
designed; conservation impoundment was commenced 
May 1962. Appurtenances are in good 
condition. Recreation facilities were provided by 
Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were 
initiated in FY 1979 and completed in FY 1989. 
Piezometer installation and a cultural resources 
survey were completed in FY 1984. Success Lake: 
Construction of project began in November 1956, 
was completed in June 1968, and final audit of 
historical land record was approved December 17, 
1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, 
initiated in October 1958, was completed in May 
1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 
to provide flood protection for which it was designed; 
conservation impoundment was commenced March 
1962. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 
710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were 
initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was 
completed in FY 1984. 
16. LITTLE DELL LAKE, UT 
Location. On Dell Creek, a tributary of Parleys 
Creek, about 8 miles east of Salt Lake City upstream 
of Mountain Dell Reservoir in Salt Lake County, UT. 
Existing Project. Project providing for construction 
of a dam about 253 feet high to create a reservoir 
with a gross capacity of 30,000 acre-feet for flood 
control, municipal and industrial water supply, 
recreation and fish and wildlife was authorized by the 
1968 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 53, 90th Cong., 1st 
sess., contains published map) as modified by sec. 
170, Water Resources Development Act of 1976, 
Public Law 94-587, October 22, 1976. Facility 
would be operated in conjunction with existing 
downstream 3,200 acre-foot Mountain Dell Reservoir 
on Parleys Creek for flood control and water 
supply. 
Authorized project has been reexamined and 
scaled down to reflect local interests' ability to pay. 
Current plan of improvement includes only flood 
control and water supply purposes. Recreation was 
deferred as of May 30, 1986, and Emigration Creek 
Diversion was deleted and placed in an inactive 
status. Project includes an earthfill dam 224 feet 
high, a 20,500 acre-foot reservoir, and 10,035 feet 
of pipeline to divert water from Parleys Creek. 
Estimated project cost (October 1994) is 
$60,500,000 (includes an allowance for estimated 
inflation through the construction period) of which 
$34,900,000 is Federal and $25,600,000 is non- 
Federal for lands and damages and includes a cash 
contribution of $20,050,000. Project is included in 
FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public 
Law 99-88) August 15, 1985. 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required 
to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and 
dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate 
buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad 
bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the 
construction of the project; pay all costs allocated to 
municipal and industrial water supply; pay 13 percent 
of costs allocated to flood control to bring total 
non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 
percent, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, 
and replacement of flood control facilities; and pay a 
cash contribution presently estimated at 
$20,050,000. By letters of January 22, 1986, and 
January 24, 1986, the Metropolitan Water District of 
Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County indicated their 
support and willingness to proceed with a reduced 
scale project based on their "ability to pay." A Local 
Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed on 
June 10, 1986. Water Revenue Bonds were issued 
August 27, 1986, and proceeds from the sale in the 
amount of $14,300,000 have been deposited in the 
Little Dell Construction Fund Account. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Engineering activities continued. Award of an exit 
35-14

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
channel improvement contract has been scheduled 
for February 1995. 
Historical summary. A Local Cooperation 
Agreement (sec. 221) was executed June 10, 1986. 
Construction was initiated in April 1988. Construction 
of core trench and test fill was completed in 
February 1989. Main dam and appurtenances 
contract was awarded May 12, 1989 and completed 
in September 1993. Project was transferred to the 
local sponsor for maintenance and operation on 
March 26, 1993. Dam was dedicated on August 5, 
1993. 
17. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS 
CREEK, NV AND CA 
Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary 
of Truckee River, near Truckee, CA; intermittent 
channel improvements are on Truckee River in 
Reno, NV. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for 
areas.) 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report 
for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 
including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. 
Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from 
Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction 
of recreation facilities under Code 710 was 
determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance 
of reservoir is Federal responsibility. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and 
operation of project, including recreation facilities, 
was continued. Structures were maintained in 
serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek 
Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum 
storage of 16,891 acre-feet occurred on May 16, 
1995. Maximum inflow to the reservoir was 1,169 
cubic feet per second on March 10, 1995, and 
maximum outflow of 508 cubic feet per second 
occurred July 17, 1995. During the year, 10,248 
acre-feet was released for irrigation purposes and 
26,919 acre-feet was released for flood control 
purposes. 
Historical summary. Project construction began 
in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; 
dam completed in August 1972; basic recreation 
facilities were completed in December 1972; and 
project was completed in June 1974. Recreation 
facilities under Code 710 funding were considered 
infeasible. Dam safety assurance studies were 
initiated in FY 1981. 
18. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA 
Location. In vicinity of city of Merced, CA, on 
streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of 
the Sierra Nevada into Merced County. Streams lie 
easterly of and drain into the San Joaquin River 
between Chowchilla River on the south and Merced 
River on the north. Drainage area represents about 
1,000 square miles; nearly 700 square miles of 
foothills and mountains in Mariposa County and 
about 300 square miles of flood plain in Merced 
County. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for 
area.) 
Existing project. Project is a modification of 
Merced County Stream Group, Calif., Improvement 
No. 18, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. 
Doc. 473, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and completed in FY 
1957. Existing project provides for con truction of 
three new reservoirs-Castle, Haystack Mountain, 
and Marguerite on Canal, Black Rascal, and 
Deadman-Dutchman Creeks, respectively, and 
enlargement of four existing reservoirs-Burns, 
Bear, Owens, and Mariposa, providing a total 
capacity of 126,700 acre-feet for multipurpose 
storage; and about 52 miles of levee and channel 
improvements in lower reaches of Bear, Black 
- Rascal, Mariposa, and Deadman Creeks, thereby 
tying the existing project channels into Eastside 
Bypass of San Joaquin River flood control system. 
Haystack Mountain, Bear, and Owens projects 
would provide flood control only; Castle and Burns 
projects, flood control and recreation; Marguerite 
project, flood control and irrigation; and Mariposa 
project, all three purposes. Existing project was 
adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not 
yet printed.) 
Current plan of improvement would defer 
enlargement of existing Burns reservoir, Mariposa 
reservoir, construction of Marguerite Dam, and the 
irrigation function associated with the latter two 
facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir 
and about 32 miles of levee and channel 
improvement on Owens, Mariposa, and Deadman- 
Dutchman Creeks. Estimated total project cost 
(October 1994) is $124,500,000 (includes an 
allowance for estimated inflation through the 
construction period), of which $85,900,000 is 
Federal and $38,600,000 is non-Federal (which 
includes a $6,400,000 cash contribution). 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required 
to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way and 
dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate 
buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, where 
necessary in the construction of the project; pay 
one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to 
recreation, presently estimated at $270,000, of 
which $230,000 is a cash contribution and $40,000 is 
for lands; and bear all costs of operation, 
maintenance, and replacement of flood control 
facilities. Total non-Federal share of Castle Dam 
first cost is $5,000,000 and includes cash contribution 
of $530,000. 
The California Reclamation Board and the City of 
Merced are the local sponsors of the authorized 
35-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
project. The Reclamation Board will serve as sole 
sponsor for the Castle Dam Unit. Merced County 
Board of Supervisors reaffirmed their support for the 
project by letter of April 4, 1986. City of Merced by 
letter of March 13, 1986, reaffirmed its support for 
and intent to furnish assurances for recreation 
aspects of the project. California Reclamation Board 
reaffirmed its support for total project by letter of 
April 9, 1986. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 
221) was executed for Castle Dam Unit on June 27, 
1986. State of California legislation (AB3369) was 
enacted on September 14, 1986 which enabled the 
Reclamation Board to financially participate in the 
project. A new Local Cooperation Agreement 
(LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the 
Army November 30, 1988, in accordance with the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The 
California Reclamation Board, the Merced County 
Board of Supervisors and the city of Merced have 
indicated support for balance of the project by letters 
of intent dated August 29, 1991 and August 20, 
1991, respectively. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Engineering activities continued for Bear Creek Dam 
Unit. At Castle Dam there were several small 
contracts ($171,202) including the installation of a 
steel trashrack completed. The final pay estimate 
was processed with minimal cost for the Castle Main 
Dam contract. Castle was transferred to sponsor for 
maintenance and operation in April 1995. 
Historical summary. Castle Dam multicomponent 
construction contract was awarded February 26, 
1991, and construction was completed in March 
1993. Castle Dam check structure contract was 
initiated in April 1993 and completed in January 
1994. Castle Dam was transferred to the sponsor on 
April 12, 1995. 
19. MERCED COUNTY STREAM 
GROUP, CA 
Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements 
are on Bear, Burns, Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in 
foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of 
city of Merced, CA. (See Geological Survey 
Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian 
Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa 
areas.) 
Existing project. For description of completed 
improvements and authorizing act, see Annual 
Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs 
at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and 
diversions from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek 
and from Creek to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost 
for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was 
Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands 
including relocations and channel improvement. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation 
of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures 
were maintained in a serviceable condition. 
Runoff from drainage areas below Merced County 
stream group reservoirs was above normal for the 
year. See Table 35-K for maximum inflow storage 
and outflow for the projects. Outflows were less than 
channel capacity rates in the project streams. 
Historical summary. Construction was initiated 
March 1948, with construction of Mariposa project, 
which was completed in November 1948. Construction 
of Owens project, initiated in March, was 
completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated 
in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and 
Bear project initiated in April, was completed in 
December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek 
diversion channels and stream-gaging stations were 
completed in April 1956. Local interests completed 
channel enlargement and restoration of channel 
capacities of Miles, Burns, Owens, and Mariposa 
Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of 
Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their 
confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements 
downstream, outside limits of project. 
20. PAJARO RIVER, CA 
Location. In the Uvas-Carnadero and Llagas 
Creeks watersheds of the upper Pajaro River Basin in 
south Santa Clara County in vicinity of the city of 
Gilroy about 75 miles south of San Francisco, CA. 
Existing project. Provides for construction of a 
2-mile levee along the north side of Uvas Creek from 
a point about 2,000 feet downstream of Thomas 
Road to about 3,500 feet upstream of Miller Avenue. 
Project will also include a bikeway and hiking trail. 
Estimated cost (October 1993) for existing project is 
$13,814,000 (includes an allowance for estimated 
inflation through the construction period), of which 
$6,907,000 is Federal and $6,907,000 is non-Federal 
(which includes $750,000 cash contribution). 
For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local 
cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted 
by Flood Control Act of 1944, December 21, 1944 
(HD 505-78, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains 
published map.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required 
to provide lands, easements, right-of-way, and 
dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate 
buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad 
bridges) and other facilities where necessary in 
construction of project; pay one-half of separable 
costs allocated to recreation and bear all cost of 
operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation 
facilities; and pay 5 percent of cost allocated to 
flood control and bear all costs of operation, 
maintenance and replacement of flood control 
facilities. Local interests will receive an estimated 
Federal reimbursement of $5,649,000 for one half of 
non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in 
35-16

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
excess of Federal costs. Local interests have agreed 
to make all required payments concurrently with 
project construction. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. Final 
accounting is underway. 
Historical summary. Responsibility for remaining 
portions of advance engineering and design, plans 
and specifications, and construction was transferred 
to Sacramento District in April 1982. Local 
Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for flood control was 
executed with the Santa Clara Valley Water District 
on June 25, 1987, and LCA for recreation was 
executed with the City of Gilroy on July 27, 1987. 
Construction began in October 1987. Construction 
for the first contract (levee work and bike path 
upstream of Thomas Road Bridge), second contract 
(levee work and hiking trails), and third and final 
contract (landscaping) has been transferred to local 
interests for operation and maintenance. Total 
reimbursement of $5,068,994 has been made to the 
local sponsor as of September 30, 1994. 
21. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS 
RIVER, CA 
Location. Reservoir is on Kings River, about 25 
miles east of Fresno, CA, and channel improvements 
are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, 
about 25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological 
Survey quadrangles of area.) Project also includes 
2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near 
Pine Flat Lake. 
Existing project. Improvement is a unit in 
comprehensive plan for flood control and other 
related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin 
Basins. Project consists of a 429-foot high concrete 
gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a 
maximum discharge capacity of 391,000 cubic feet 
per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage 
capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, 
irrigation, and related purposes. Outlet provisions for 
future power development are included in dam, but 
Federal construction of power-generating facilities is 
not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and 
channel work on Kings River and its distributaries on 
valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno. Channel 
improvement work will enlarge channel capacities 
and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings 
River. There are nine public-use and recreation 
areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the 
Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and 
concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five 
boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps 
on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is 
$42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal 
(including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and 
$570,000 non-Federal for rights-of-way for downstream 
channel improvements. For future non-Federal 
reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. 
Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine 
Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is 
$1,595,100 exclusive of recreation facilities previously 
provided at a cost of $13,700. In addition, 
Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat 
Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration 
Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239,235 
(July 1963). Operation and maintenance of dam and 
reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing project 
was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 
630, 76th Cong., 3d sess., contains latest published 
map). 
Local cooperation. Local interests must 
reimburse the Federal Government for first costs 
allocated to irrigation functions of reservoir portion 
of project in accordance with reclamation law. Under 
provision of War Department Civil Appropriations 
Act of 1947, the Secretary of War, with concurrence 
of the Secretary of the Interior, determined 
allocation of cost to irrigation should be set at an 
amount not to exceed $14,250,000. In addition, 
local interests must pay 37.4 percent of annual 
maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of 
'dam and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. 
Repayment contracts between the Bureau of 
Reclamation and the local water users for the 
irrigation use of the reservoir were executed 
December 23, 1963. The Bureau is administering the 
contracts in accordance with reclamation law as 
amended by the Reclamation Reform Act of October 
12, 1982. That act generally exempts the limitations 
under the early reclamation laws as being applicable 
to projects constructed by the Corps with two 
exceptions; however, all existing contracts to share 
construction and maintenance costs remain in effect. 
Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Bureau 
provided conservation water to local interests under 
an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid 
$140,872 for irrigation services through December 
31, 1994. With respect to the downstream channel 
improvements, sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 
1936, applies. King River Conservation District 
represents local interests; assurances were accepted 
November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished 
all requirements for construction rights-of-way for 
construction of channel improvements required to 
date. Three concessionaires each at Lakeridge 
Marina (Deer Creek), Pine Flat Marina and 
Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in 
accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary 
of the Army. Estimated cost to date of facilities 
installed by these concessionaires is $1,727,000. 
Fresno County developed public-use facilities on an 
85-acre tract immediately downstream from dam for 
picnicking, camping, swimming, and playground 
activities, at an estimated cost of $476,000 under 
provisions of a license agreement. The U.S. Forest 
Service developed and operates a picnic area at the 
upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is 
about $37,500. Installation of a hydroelectric 
powerplant, located at the downstream toe of the 
Corps Pine Flat Dam, was completed in January 1984 
by Kings River Conservation District. Project consists 
35-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
of an outdoor-type powerhouse containing three 
generating units with capacities of 55 megawatts each 
for a total of 165 megawatts. Conservation District 
would make use of the three existing 13.5-foot 
diameter penstocks that were installed in Pine Flat 
Dam when constructed in 1954. 
Licenses. License No. 1988, effective April 1, 
1955, was issued by Federal Power Commission to 
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power 
development of North Fork Kings River by the 
company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. 
Under interim Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1182 
with the Department of the Army, Pacific Gas and 
Electric Co. paid for storage of power water in the 
Pine Flat reservoir May 15, 1954, through March 31, 
1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1328 
with the Department of the Army provides for storage 
of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot; 
the contract covers April 1, 1955, through March 31, 
2005. By an agreement of January 1972, supplementing 
the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas 
and Electric Co. transferred ownership of most of its 
Kings River system water to the Kings River Water 
Association. Accordingly, no further significant 
storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the 
reservoir at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment 
under these contracts through June 30, 1972, (last 
year of payment), amounts to $2,478,798; these 
funds were paid to Sacramento District and deposited 
for return to the Treasury. License No. 2741, 
effective September 25, 1979, was issued by the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to the Kings 
River Conservation District for hydropower development 
at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat 
Dam. Payment to the Department of the Army for 
construction and installation of the penstocks in the 
amount of $1,044,685 was made to Sacramento 
District and deposited for return to the Treasury in 
November 1985. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. 
Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities 
continued. Dam safety assurance studies were 
continued at a fiscal year cost of $124,621. Contract 
for water stop repair at Pine Flat Dam was 
completed. Structures were maintained in serviceable 
condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat 
Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum 
storage of 983,991 acre-feet occurred on July 10, 
1995. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 
40,868 cubic feet per second on March 10, 1995, 
and maximum outflow of 13,302 cubic feet per 
second occurred on July 11, 1995. During the year, 
2,236,682 acre-feet was released for irrigation and 
spreading. Releases for flood control amounted to 
482,372 acre-feet. 
Historical summary. Construction began in April 
1947 and project, including channel improvement, 
was completed in September 1977. Main dam was 
initiated in January 1950, completed in June 1954, 
and has been operating since February 1954 to 
provide flood protection for which it was designed. 
Total of 35.2 miles of new and reconstructed levees 
and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been 
transferred to the Kings River Conservation District 
for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various 
recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are 
complete. Completed preliminary design and cost 
estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by 
the State, but the State was unable to provide 
necessary assurances of local cooperation. Dam 
safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. A 
cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 
On May 15, 1991, Pine Flat Lake acquired 
additional acreage as part of a memorandum of 
understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the 
Army and Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service). 
The Corps exchanged Isabella Lake and the 16,000 
acres around that lake currently being used for park 
and recreational purposes for approximately 2,500 
acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat 
Lake. 
22. REDBANK AND FANCHER 
CREEKS, CA 
Location. Northeast and adjacent to the 
Fresno-Clovis Metropolitan Area in Fresno County 
about 170 miles southeast of Sacramento, CA. 
Existing project. Provides for flood control 
detention basins on Redbank Creek, Pup Creek, and 
Alluvial Drain; construction of a dam 45.5 feet high 
to create a reservoir with gross capacity of 10,300 
acre-feet for flood control on Fancher Creek; and 
enlargement of Big Dry Creek project to provide 
increased flood protection and recreational development. 
Since the local sponsor does not support 
recreational development at this time, the recreation 
feature of the project is considered to be inactive. 
The authorization Act states "measures determined 
appropriate by the Secretary of the Army to minimize 
benefits to groundwater recharge" shall be included 
in the project. Estimated cost (October 1994) for 
existing project is $70,850,000 (includes an 
allowance for estimated inflation through the 
construction period), of which $48,450,000 is 
Federal and $22,400,000 is non-Federal (which 
includes $3,510,000 cash contribution). For future 
non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation 
paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 401, 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public 
Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. (HD 98-147, 
98th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) 
Local cooperation. Local interests are required 
to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and 
dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate 
buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad 
bridges) and other facilities where necessary in 
construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost 
allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal 
share of flood control costs to 25 percent, of which 
$3,510,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of 
35-18

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
operation, maintenance and replacement of flood 
control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make 
all required payments concurrently with project 
construction. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Engineering activities, real estate crediting, and 
project auditing were continued. 
Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement 
was executed on August 1, 1987. Project 
construction was begun in September 1987 with 
initiation of archaeological work on Cultural 
Resources Preservation. Construction contract for 
Dry Creek Crossing was completed and transferred to 
local interests for operation and maintenance on 
January 10, 1989. Construction at Redbank Creek 
Detention Basin was completed and transferred to 
local interests for operation and maintenance on 
August 23, 1990. Construction contract for Fancher 
Creek Dam awarded May 23, 1990, was completed 
and transferred to local interests for operation and 
maintenance on March 13, 1992. Construction 
contract for Big Dry Dam, Pup and Alluvial detention 
basins was awarded March 18, 1992. Big Dry Creek 
Dam and Pup Creek Detention Basin were 
transferred to local interests on June 22, 1994. Last 
piece of completed work, Alluvial Drain Detention 
Basin, was transferred to local interests for 
maintenance and operation on July 18, 1994. 
23. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA 
Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in 
northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, 
and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific 
Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San 
Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological 
Survey map for California.) 
Existing project. Active authorized project 
provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of 
Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 
feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height 
of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on 
Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower 
reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek 
downstream from dam. Project also provides for 
expansion of fish hatchery capacity at Dry Creek, 
Warm Springs, to compensate for fish losses on 
Russian River attributed to operation of Coyote Dam 
component of project. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake 
Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and 
maintained by the United States. (See tables 35-L 
and 35-M for latest approved estimated costs.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for 
Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements 
accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, 
local interests are required by the authorizing act to 
comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for 
channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any 
encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which 
would interfere with proper functioning of the 
channel improvement works; adjust all claims 
concerning water rights arising from the construction 
and operation of the improvements, including 
acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of 
fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; 
and reimburse the United States in accordance with 
the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that 
part of the joint-use construction cost, (30.2 percent 
currently estimated at $103,760,000) and an 
ultimate 32.5 percent of the annual operation, 
maintenance, and replacement joint-use costs 
allocated to municipal and industrial water supply. 
The estimated annual cost to local interests for 
maintenance of channel improvement works is 
$80,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly 
Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation 
District) provided assurances of willingness and 
ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 
00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, 
December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759, August 5, 
1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and 
Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma 
County Flood Control and Water Conservation 
District further indicated their interest in optimization 
of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to 
provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement 
to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm 
Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 
212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified 
in a water supply contract with the local sponsor 
approved in October 1982. Local interests have 
expended approximately $1,000,000 to provide 
partial flood protection in project area and have 
constructed facilities at an approximate cost of 
$20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed 
Coyote Valley reservoir. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Coyote Valley Dam: None. Dry Creek (Warm 
Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities 
continued. The Gualala Redwoods claim that their 
access to Kelly Road was cut off by Corps project 
(Warm Springs) went to trial in October 1992. 
Judgement resulting was a cost of $3,162,000 to the 
Federal Government. Major items of contract work 
included: Completion of Liberty Glen wastewater 
system at fiscal year cost of $353,795 and initiation 
and completion of contaminated soil remediation, 
$83,000. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: 
Operation and maintenance continued. Dam safety 
assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost 
of $119,661. Structures were maintained in 
serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork Russian 
River at Coyote Dam was above normal for the year. 
Maximum storage of 111,863 acre-feet occurred on 
January 16, 1995. Maximum hourly inflow to 
reservoir was 10,409 cubic feet per second on 
January 8, 1995. Maximum release of 6,018 cubic 
feet per second occurred on January 19, 1995. 
During the year, 101,480 acre-feet was released for 
flood control, and 134,055 acre-feet was released 
for irrigation and other purposes. Dry Creek (Warm 
35-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and 
maintenance continued. Structures were maintained 
in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at 
Warm Springs Dam was above normal for the year. 
Maximum storage of 342,526 acre-feet occurred 
January 16, 1995. Maximum hourly inflow to 
reservoir was 23,964 cubic feet per second on March 
9, 1995. Maximum release of 5,.070 cubic feet per 
second occurred January 20, 1995. During the year, 
130,702 acre-feet was released for irrigation and 
other purposes. Releases for flood control amounted 
to 239,308 acre-feet. 
Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of 
recreation facilities at completed project (Lake 
Mendocino), is about 99 percent complete. Coyote 
Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed 
April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which 
$11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). 
Work, including removal of slides resulting 
from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. 
Bank stabilization work on Russian River near 
Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel 
improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River 
and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 
1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility 
was transferred to the Sacramento District. 
Warm Springs construction completions include 
fish hatchery in December 1980, project overlook in 
May 1981, reservoir clearing in July 1981, 
downstream stabilization sills in October 1981, dam 
closure in October 1982, spillway repair at Warm 
Springs Dam in September 1985, boat launching 
facilities, Phase I, in September 1985, Rockpile Road 
Upgrade, Yorty Creek Beach, and remedial work at 
Liberty Glen camping area in September 1990, fish 
hatchery expansion in September 1992, final control 
tower grouting, dam access road repair, spillway 
stabilization, fish hatchery emergency water supply in 
September 1993, and Liberty Glen wastewater 
system and contaminated soil remediation. Initial 
filling of Warm Springs reservoir was commenced on 
November 1, 1984. Responsibility for construction 
was transferred to Sacramento District in August 
1983. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at 
Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. 
24. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND 
TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM 
COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM 
Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in 
north-central California, flows generally southerly 
about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm 
of San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, CA. Works 
covered by this improvement are on Sacramento 
River and tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, 
about mile 312. Drainage area above Rio Vista is 
26,500 square miles (See Geological Survey 
quadrangles of area for Sacramento River and Upper 
Butte Basin: Flournoy and Fruto quadrangles for 
Black Butte Lake: and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, 
Redding, and Hooker quadrangles for Table 
Mountain Lake.) 
Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento 
River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam 
was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for 
flood control and other related purposes in 
Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and 
major and minor tributaries, for flood control 
purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on 
Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir 
and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from 
present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing; 
construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension 
of Moulton weir, and construction of a bypass 
through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new 
levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing 
levees in Sutter, Tisdale, Sacramento, and Yolo 
Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel 
enlargement on following minor tributaries of 
Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud 
Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico 
Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek 
(Tehama County); Thomes Creek; and Willow 
Creek. Improvement provides for about 155 miles of 
channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees 
with an average height of 12 feet and a freeboard of 3 
feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as 
required for protection of bypass levee slopes against 
erosion. Total first cost for project is $18,300,000 
(October 1988), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, 
and $6,400,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, 
including relocations. (See table 35-N on project 
units classified and excluded from cost estimate.) (b) 
Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA: 
An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood 
Control project which provides for construction of 
bank protection works and minor channel improvements 
as required on Sacramento River between 
Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control 
purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1987) for 
project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties 
is $31,000,000, of which $25,700,000 is Federal cost 
and $5,300,000 non-Federal cost for lands and 
damages including relocations and cash contribution 
of $3,435,000. (c) Sacramento River, CA, Bank 
Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 
430,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second 
phase covering 405,000 lineal feet of bank protection 
under a long range program of bank protection, 
erosion control works, and setback levees at critical 
locations within limits of authorized or existing levees 
included in the Sacramento River Flood Control 
project to protect integrity of levee system for flood 
control purposes. Total estimated (October 1995) 
first cost for project is $221,700,000, (includes an 
allowance for estimated inflation through the 
construction period) of which $159,100,000 is 
Federal and $62,600,000 non-Federal comprised of 
lands and damages including relocations and 
$40,250,000 required cash contribution toward first 
cost. Total estimated cost for recreation facilities, 
$2,585,000 (includes both Federal and non-Feder- 
35-20

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
al). Construction in (a), (b), and (c) above 
supplements program of levee improvements as 
accomplished pursuant to 1917 Flood Control Act, 
as amended by subsequent acts, including 1941 
Flood Control Act, and which are reported on page 
35-3A under Sacramento River, CA, flood control. 
(d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte 
Lake. For description of completed project see 
Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project 
is $14,508,820, including $475,507 for basic 
recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, 
see Local cooperation paragraph. 
Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from 
Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire 
at Black Butte Marina provided public use 
facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the 
Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of 
$87,000. (e) Authorization also provided for 
construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) 
project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 
3 miles north of Red Bluff, CA. This project unit was 
deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see 
Annual Report for 1978. 
Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and 
major and minor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control 
Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with 
for all work completed or under contract, and local 
interests indicated they will be able to fulfill 
requirements for remaining work as scheduled. 
Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for 
the "active" project has been completed, transferred 
to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, 
Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control 
Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must 
also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. 
Fully complied with for portions completed in 
Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; completed 
work, bank protection at 36 sites, was transferred to 
and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River 
Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act 
of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also 
contribute an amount in cash that, when added to 
costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility 
modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit 
of remedial work; this contribution is estimated 
(October 1995) at $40,2520,000. Local interests 
fully complied with requirements for all work 
completed or under contract, and indicated they will 
be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as 
scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local 
interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more 
feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute 
costs over and above costs of setbacks, and provide 
local contribution indicated above. Completed units 
transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black 
Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local 
interests must pay the portion of first cost and annual 
operation and maintenance costs allocated to the 
conservation functions of the project; these costs are 
estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 
percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to 
October 22, 1970, contract between the Bureau of 
Reclamation and the State of California provided for 
repayment of irrigation storage costs; Bureau 
administered contract in accordance with reclamation 
law. Local interests paid a total of $77,205 for 
irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 
91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided 
that Black Butte project be financially integrated with 
the Central Valley project, coordinated operationally 
with other Central Valley project storage units by the 
Bureau under the Secretary of the Interior, and that 
dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically 
operated and maintained by the Corps in a manner 
compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor 
tributaries-None. (b) Sacramento River Bank 
Protection Project--Engineering and design activities 
continued. (See table 35-0 for construction 
accomplished and contract costs.) (c) Sacramento 
River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff. None. (d) Black 
Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: 
None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation 
activities continued. Structures were maintained in 
serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte 
Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum 
storage of 149,259 acre-feet occurred March 11, 
1995. Maximum hourly inflow to Black Butte 
reservoir was 47,701 cubic feet per second on 
January 9, 1995, and maximum outflow of 15,323 
cubic feet per second occurred on January 9, 1995. 
During the year, 838,865 acre-feet was released for 
flood control and 281,158 acre-feet was released for 
irrigation and other purposes. (e) Table Mountain 
(Iron Canyon) Lake: None. 
Historical summary. (a) Sacramento River and 
major and minor tributaries (active portions): 
Construction was initiated in May 1949 on Deer 
Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder 
Creek, Chico and Mud Creeks, and Sandy Gulch 
units have been completed. Active portion of this 
improvement is about 99 percent complete. Work 
remaining is bypass levee revetment as required, 
which will accomplished under Sacramento River 
Bank Protection project. (b) Sacramento River Bank 
Protection Project: Construction of first unit was 
initiated in June 1963; initial phase of project was 
completed in November 1974. Phase II is underway, 
and overall project is about 91 percent complete. (c) 
Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: 
Active portion of project, bank protection in Tehama 
County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in 
March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to 
place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 
36 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn 
Counties as of September 1985 and transferred to 
State for maintenance. Bank protection on Sacramento 
River, Tehama County--one site, mile 215, 
(Unit 5), was completed November 1982, two sites, 
mile 209.5 and mile 217.5, (Unit 6), were completed 
in November 1983, and four sites, 241.0, 237.9, 
237.7, and 237.5 (Unit 7) were completed in 
February 1985. (d) Black Butte Lake: Construction 
35-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final 
land acquisition was completed in December 1966. 
Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 
and completed in December 1963. Dam has been 
operating since November 1962 to provide the flood 
protection for which it was designed. Final cost 
allocation approved May 3, 1977. Dam safety 
assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980 and 
completed in FY 1986. Piezometer installation and 
slope for protection at the dam were completed in FY 
1983. A cultural resources survey was completed in 
FY 1984. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: 
Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 
25. WALNUT CREEK, CA 
Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower 
reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, 
Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo, and 
Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, CA. Improvement 
will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project 
about 1 mile above southern limits of city of Walnut 
Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south 
of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles 
for area.) 
Existing project. Comprises extension of existing 
levees, construction of new levees and concrete 
channels, channel rectification and enlargement, and 
utilization of improvements constructed or planned 
by local interests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles 
of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete 
drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of 
levees. Cost estimate (October 1992) is $98,100,000 
(includes an allowance for estimated inflation 
through the construction period), of which 
$71,630,000 is Federal cost and $26,470,000 is 
non-Federal cost (includes $20,945,000 for lands 
and damages and relocations except railroad 
facilities, and $5,840,000 required cash contribution 
for land enhancement benefits provided by the 
project). Local interests have expended about $3 
million for flood control in the project area during 
the period 1955-1965, including the concrete 
conduits constructed through the city of Walnut 
Creek at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered 
a preproject condition to be incorporated in the 
Corps project. In addition, local developers have 
made channel improvements for Upper Pine Creek 
valued at $5,050,000. The cost thereof is not 
included in above costs of local cooperation. 
Improvement adopted by 1960 Flood Control Act 
(H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest 
published map). 
Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act 
of June 22. 1936. applies, except that relocation of 
railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In 
addition, local interests must make a cash contribution 
to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of 
cost of construction for land enhancement benefits 
provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated 
(October 1992) at S5,840.000. Local interests are 
represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control 
and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, 
including evidence of financial and legal ability to 
fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were 
accepted by the Sacramento District Engineer on 
November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District 
furnished all rights-of-way required to date and 
indicated that it will furnish all requirements as 
needed for future construction. The Flood Control 
District will arrange for highway bridge modifications 
and utility relocations before start of work by the 
Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed 
funds will be made in installments in amounts equal 
to 7.4 percent of the estimated construction 
expenditure for each fiscal year. Flood Control 
District and city of Walnut Creek have requested that 
recreation be added as a project purpose and will 
share costs in accordance with Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986. Post Authorization 
Change for recreation was approved July 27, 1987. 
In 1995, the city of Walnut Creek, decided not to 
proceed with the recreation project. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: None. 
Historical summary. Construction was initiated 
June 1964; project is about 98 percent complete. 
Total of 17.7 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 
miles of levee construction, part of channel 
improvement landscaping, Drop Structures No. 1 
and 2 and construction under San Ramon Bypass 
Contract No. 1, Contract No. 2 and Contract No. 3 
and Upper Pine Creek Channel contact have been 
transferred to local interests for operation and 
maintenance. Due to contractor difficulties with 
Contract No. 1 (Lionsgate claims and court action) 
part of the contract work was completed under 
Contract No. 1A with a different contractor. A 
contract for remedial work on San Ramon Bypass 
Contract No. 2 channel cover was completed in 
August 1993. The 9-acre mitigation contract was 
completed in June 1993. Work remaining consists of 
completion of erosion control mitigation (8-acre). 
Construction responsibility was transferred from 
San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. 
26. WILDCAT AND SAN PABLO 
CREEKS, CA 
Location. Project is located in vicinity of San 
Pablo and Richmond, Contra Costa County, CA, 
about 20 miles northeast of San Francisco, CA. 
Existing project. Current plan of improvement 
reflects only Reach 1, which is from San Pablo Bay to 
AT&SF Railroad tracks on both Wildcat and San 
Pablo Creeks; Reach 1 consists of 9,900 lineal feet of 
channel improvements on Wildcat Creek and 10,000 
lineal feet of channel improvements on San Pablo 
Creek. Improvements include channel deepening, 
levees, stilling basins, and flow control weirs. 
Additionally, about 20 acres will be planted for 
35-22

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
mitigation of fish and wildlife. Reach 2, which is 
upstream of AT&SF Railroad tracks and consists of 
9,400 lineal feet of channel and levee work on 
Wildcat Creek, 1,800 lineal feet of channel and levee 
work on San Pablo Creek, and mitigation for fish and 
wildlife on 8 acres, was determined to be 
economically infeasible, excluded from total project 
cost, and reclassified as inactive. Project also 
includes recreation features on Wildcat Creek. 
Approved estimated cost of new work (1995) is 
$35,700,000 (includes an allowance for estimated 
inflation through the construction period), of which 
$20,170,000 is Federal cost, and $15,530,000 is 
non-Federal cost (includes $1,624,000 cash contribution). 
Improvements adopted by House and 
Senate Public Works Committee Resolutions June 9 
and 15, 1976, respectively, under provisions of sec. 
201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 511, 94th 
Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map).For 
details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. 
Local cooperation. In accordance with cost 
sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests 
are required to provide lands, easements, rights of 
way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or 
relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except 
railroad bridges), and other facilities, where 
necessary in the construction of project; pay 
one-half of the separable costs allocated to 
recreation and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, 
and replacement of recreation facilities; pay 5 
percent of the costs allocated to flood control and 
bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and 
replacement of flood control facilities. Local 
interests have agreed to make all required payments 
concurrently with project construction. The Board of 
Supervisors of Contra Costa County by Resolution 
73-466, June 25, 1973, agreed to assume obligations 
of local cooperation. On November 9, 1976, the 
Board reaffirmed sponsorship by Resolution 76-960. 
Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water 
Conservation District Board of Supervisors formed 
an Assessment District, August 3, 1982, which 
assures availability of funds for local share of 
non-Federal portion of flood control project costs 
for a modified plan of improvement. A flood control 
Local Cooperation Agreement satisfying all requirements 
of sec. 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public 
Law 91-661) and consistent with the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 
99-662), was executed on June 20, 1986 between 
the Department of the Army and the Contra Costa 
County Flood Control and Water Conservation 
District. By Resolution No. 1985-12-351, adopted 
December 17, 1985, the East Bay Regional Park and 
Recreation District stated support for development of 
trail and recreational improvements for the project 
and indicated its intent to share in 50 percent of the 
cost of such improvements and perform operation 
and maintenance responsibility. A recreation Local 
Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the 
Assistant Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1992. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Engineering and construction continued. Channel 
improvement contract 3A, San Pablo Creek 
continued at fiscal year cost of $1,055,642. 
Historical summary. Local interests withdrew 
support of project in 1979. Project responsibility was 
transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 
1982. After 1982-1983 floods, local interests again 
indicated support of the project, and in October 
1983, project work was resumed by Sacramento 
District. A revised final environmental impact 
statement was filed March 28, 1986, and a General 
Design Memorandum was approved May 29, 1986. 
Flood Control Local Cooperation Agreement was 
executed June 20, 1986. Recreation Design 
Memorandum was approved on February 19, 1992, 
and the recreation LCA was signed on April 15, 
1992. Construction work under Contract No. 1 and 
Contract No. 2 for Reach No. 1 of Wildcat and San 
Pablo Creeks has been transferred to local sponsor 
for operation and maintenance. In March 1990, 
Reach 2 was declared infeasible and is now inactive. 
All costs have been deleted from project cost 
estimate. Flood control portion of the project is 
about 95 percent complete. Recreation features are 
50 percent complete. 
27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Approved regulations for operation and maintenance 
of flood control works, part 208, title 33, Code 
of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of 
completed projects transferred to local interests for 
operation and maintenance to determine status of 
project and insure compliance with regulations. 
During fiscal year, inspections were made of: 
Completed units of Fairfield Vicinity Streams; 
completed units of Sacramento River and major and 
minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento 
River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; completed units 
of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings 
River Channel Improvement (Pine Flat Lake 
project), and Walnut Creek project; American River 
levees; Merced County Stream group; Middle Creek 
(Lake County); Chester, North Fork Feather River; 
levee and channel improvements on Chowchilla 
River (Buchanan project) and Fresno River (Hidden 
project); Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, 
Littlejohn Creek, Mormon Slough, Bear Creek, 
Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North 
Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee 
River, CA and NV; completed units of lower San 
Joaquin River and tributaries, CA; completed units of 
Red Bank and Fancher Creeks including Big Dry 
Creek Dam and diversion, and Fancher Dam and 
Redbank, Alluvial Drain and Pup Creek detention 
basins, CA; Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV; 
Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan River, 
Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek, all in Utah; 
various emergency flood control works under 
authority of sec. 208, Flood Control Act of June 30, 
35-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 
28, 1955, and antecedent legislation; and sec. 14 of 
Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946. Maintenance 
inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements 
and regulations are being complied with on 
completed flood control works. Continuing effort is 
required to improve maintenance practices and 
active steps are being taken by responsible State and 
local agencies to achieve desired results. Local 
agencies were advised, as necessary, of measures 
required to maintain these projects in accordance 
with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost 
of inspection for fiscal year of $531,052 included 
continuation of dam safety assurance program for 
Folsom Lake, CA $309,172. 
28. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, 
Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended 
(Preauthorization). 
Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year 
were $633,402. See Table 35-P for list of studies. 
Emergency flood control activities-repair, 
flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 
84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). 
Federal cost for fiscal year was $208,046, all of 
which was for disaster preparedness. 
Emergency bank protection (sec. 14, 1946 
Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). 
Federal cost for fiscal year was $958,694 all of 
which was used for emergency operations. 
Snagging and clearing navigable streams and 
tributaries in interest of flood control (sec. 208, 
1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d 
Cong.). 
No snagging and clearing activities this fiscal year. 
Flood insurance activities (sec. 1301-1377, 
1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, 
Public Law 90-448 as amended). 
In coordination with flood control activities, two 
flood insurance studies were continued. Inter- 
Agency Agreements EMW-E-2226 and 2994, 
respectively, at a fiscal year cost of $11,221 under 
Federal Emergency Management Agency 
reimbursable order. 
29. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL 
RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 
In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 
1944, summaries of monthly reservoir operations at 
Big Dry Creek. Boca, Camanche, Del Valle, Folsom, 
Friant (Millerton Lake), Indian Valley, Los Banos 
Detention, New Bullards Bar, New Don Pedro, New 
Exchequer (Lake McClure), New Melones, Oroville, 
Prosser, Shasta, and Stampede, CA; East Canyon, 
Echo, Jordanelle, Little Dell, Lost Creek, Pineview, 
Red Fleet, Starvation, and Wanship, UT; and Blue 
Mesa, Lemon, Paonia, Ridgway, and Vallecito, CO, 
were prepared. No water control manual revisions 
were completed due to environmental issues. Corps 
personnel provided advice as requested during flood 
control operations at all sec. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year 
cost was $651,071. Total cost to September 30, 
1995, was $8,227,614. 
Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 
30. NEW MELONES LAKE, CA 
Location. On Stanislaus River about three-quarters 
mile downstream from existing Melones Dam 
and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. 
(See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.). 
Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) 
an earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to 
create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 
2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, 
power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and 
other purposes, and (b) a powerplant below the dam 
with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon 
completion of construction of dam and powerplant 
by the Corps, the project became an integral part of 
Central Valley project and is being operated and 
maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant 
to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood 
control operation of the project shall be in 
accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by 
the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of 
Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San 
Joaquin River to a capacity of at least 8,000 cubic 
feet per second will also be Corps responsibility. 
Approved estimated (October 1995) Federal cost is 
$401,200,000 (includes an allowance for estimated 
inflation through the construction period). For future 
non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation 
paragraph. In addition, local interests expended 
$300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus 
River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood 
Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., 
contains latest published map). This act modified 
original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood 
Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 
78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) 
The 1944 Flood Control act established $8 million 
monetary limitation for partial accomplishment of 
project. Further monetary authorizations of $2.5 
million, $5 million, $13 million, $2 million, $17 
million, $18 million, $44 million, $83 million, $46 
million, $6 million, and $61 million were provided 
for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d 
Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90-483, 91-282, 
92-222, 93-251, 94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, 
making a total monetary authorization of 
$305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising 
35-24

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including 
Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA. Since FY 
1979, appropriations have not been subject to the 
river basin monetary limitation. 
Local cooperation. Based on approved preliminary 
cost allocation studies (July 1965) local interests 
will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 
12.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance 
costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 31.1 percent 
of first cost and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be 
allocated to power. Local interests must also 
maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River 
from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River and 
prevent encroachment on channel and floodway 
between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity 
throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per 
second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and 
power will be the responsibility of the Bureau of 
Reclamation. Reimbursement of costs will be in 
accordance with Bureau policies and procedures for 
the Central Valley project. State of California 
officially adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes 
of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes 
authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish 
required assurances. The Board, by letter dated 
December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required 
assurances when formally requested to do so. 
Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 
1977. On October 2, 1979, the Board reaffirmed its 
intent to furnish the required assurances. On 
January 6, 1983, the Board provided formal 
assurances of local cooperation. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Engineering activities continued. Flowage 
easement acquisition along the Lower Stanislaus 
River and continuation of Tuttletown recreation 
area, campgrounds C&B construction contract. 
Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities 
continued on Lower Stanislaus River. 
Historical summary. Construction was initiated 
in August 1966. Main dam contract which was 
awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam 
dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. 
Cultural resources preservation, water intake facilities, 
flood control and irrigation tailrace modification, 
reservoir area clearing, Tuttletown Phase I 
recreation area, Oakdale recreation, Glory Hole 
Phase I and Phase II recreation area, and operations 
access road contracts have all been completed. Glory 
Hole minimal recreation facilities contract has been 
completed. Boundary fencing, Lower Stanislaus 
Phase I and Phase II minimal recreation facilities, 
Lower Stanislaus Corporation Yard, and Lower 
Stanislaus Administration Building contracts have 
been completed. Tuttletown minimal recreation 
facilities, McHenry recreation area, Tuttletown 
wastewater treatment, Knights Ferry recreation 
area,Knights Ferry Covered Bridge, Glory Hole 
recreation area sanitary system, Two-Mile Bar 
recreation, administration building, and Glory Hole 
recreation area force main contracts have been 
completed. Parrotts Ferry Bridge modification (Nov 
93), Widening Highway 49 Intersection (Aug 94); 
Tuttletown Recreation Campgrounds, and Tuttletown 
and Glory Hole Improvement (Jan 94) have 
been completed. Overall project is nearing 
completion except for Lower Stanislaus River 
recreation facilities. Remaining recreation facilities 
were unscheduled pending development of cost 
sharing agreements and/or specific Congressional 
appropriation of funds. A Memorandum of Understanding 
between the Department of the Interior and 
the Department of the Army transferring the New 
Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of 
Engineers to the Bureau of Reclamation was 
executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement 
provides that the Corps complete land acquisition 
actions and retain budgeting, design, and construction 
responsibility for reservoir clearing and recreation 
development; completion of cultural resources 
mitigation in project area was vested in the 
Department of the Interior. The California State 
Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of 
April 1973 established conditions which impacted on 
the planned filling and operation of the project by the 
Department of the Interior. As a result, the 
Department of Interior brought suit against the State 
of California claiming State limitations on project 
operation were contrary to Congressional intent and 
authority. The case was heard before the U.S. 
District Court in Fresno, CA, and in early March 
1981, a Federal judge ruled that the Federal 
Government could fill the New Melones reservoir for 
purpose of generating electrical power, but not for 
agricultural or other purposes. Both the Government 
and the California State Resources Control Board 
appealed this decision to the 9th Circuit Court of 
Appeals in San Francisco, CA. 
On December 20, 1982, the Court upheld all 25 
requirements placed on the Federal Government by 
the State Water Resources Control Board. The 
decision reversed the lower court's decision to permit 
filling of the reservoir for generating electrical power. 
The Bureau of Reclamation subsequently filed for a 
permit from the State Water Resources Control 
Board to fill the reservoir. Permit was approved. The 
Bureau had originally started generating power on a 
limited basis on July 1, 1979; however, after the 
filling of the reservoir in spring of 1983, full power 
generating benefits have been attained. Project is 
about 99.9 percent complete. 
General Investigations 
31. SURVEYS 
See Table 35-Q. 
32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
BASIC DATA 
Technical assistance was performed for other 
Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in 
35-25

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
connection with Flood Plain Management Services 
Program at fiscal year costs of $430,230. No Flood 
Plain Information Studies were prepared after FY 
1980. 
Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were 
$18,000. 
33. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 
The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated 
as a separate Field Operating Agency as of 
January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent 
orders 1-1, January 10, 1979, but Sacramento 
District is continuing to provide advisory and 
administrative support services to HEC as specified in 
local support agreement DACW05-79-A-0038 of 
March 1979. Fiscal year costs were $2,702,691, of 
which $66,400 was for collection and study of basic 
data (including flood plain management service), 
$1,284,945 was for research and development, and 
$1,351,346 was for operation and maintenance 
activities. 
34. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 
AND DESIGN 
TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV 
Project is located in metropolitan area of Reno and 
Sparks in Washoe County, NV. 
Current plan of improvement consists of about 7 
miles of levees, 5 miles of floodwalls, 3 bridge 
replacements along Truckee River and includes 
limited channel excavation, a detention dam on 
Steamboat Creek at Huffaker Narrows, and 
backwater levees along Steamboat Creek, Boynton 
Slough. and the North Truckee Drain just north of 
the Interstate Highway 80 crossing. Plan also 
includes recreation facilities with bicycle and 
pedestrian paths, river overlooks, and picnic sites; 
mitigation measures (31 acres of riparian plantings to 
replace vegetation losses); and fish and wildlife 
features. Project will provide flood protection from 
Truckee River to cities of Reno and Sparks and 
Truckee Meadows urban areas. 
Project has been deferred and preconstruction 
planning has been terminated as project is 
economically infeasible. Coordination with local 
agencies and sponsors was continued. Estimated 
preconstruction planning cost is $4,300,000. 
NAPA RIVER, CA 
Project is located in city and county of Napa, CA. 
Current plan of improvement consists of channel 
excavation, floodwalls, set-back levees, bypass 
channels, and related environmental mitigation 
measures. The improvements on Napa River would 
extend about 5.6 miles, from Trancas Street to 
Kennedy Park. Approximately 3,100 feet of Napa 
Creek, from Main Street to Earl Street, would also be 
improved. 
Project will provide 100-year level of flood 
protection from Napa River and Napa Creek to city 
of Napa. 
A hazardous, toxic and radioactive waste 
preliminary evaluation was continued. Drafts of a 
General Design Memorandum supplement and an 
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental 
Impact Report supplement were completed in March 
1995. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is 
$13,000,000. 
UPPER JORDAN RIVER, UT 
Project is located in Salt Lake County, UT, just 
south of Salt Lake City corporate limit. 
Project consists of a flood control diversion and 
sediment control structure on Mill Creek above 
Highland Drive and a 7,440 foot long, 96-inch 
diameter conduit from the diversion structure into a 
proposed Hillview Detention Basin south of Mill 
Creek. Project is designed to operate as a system that 
will be integrated into existing flood control system of 
Salt Lake County. Once in place, project will 
provide nearly 100-year level of flood protection on 
Mill Creek above State Street. 
A draft General Design Memorandum (GDM) 
and Project Authorization Change (PAC) were 
submitted in November 1993; final GDM and PAC 
were submitted in March 1994. PAC was submitted 
to obtain Congressional authorization for a new cost 
limit established by sec 902, WRDA 1986. Estimated 
preconstruction planning cost is $1,600,000. 
35. OTHER WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORITY 
YOLO BASIN WETLANDS, SACRAMENTO 
RIVER, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification 
for Improvement of Environment 
The Yolo Basin Wetlands area is primarily located 
within the boundaries of the Yolo Bypass, an 
operative feature of the Sacramento River Flood 
Control Project. Yolo Bypass extends 43 miles from 
Fremont Weir on the Sacramento River, south to the 
town of Rio Vista where it rejoins the river. 
Project will include restoration of wetlands, and 
contribute to a larger program now in the planning 
stage, proposed by an interagency group of state and 
local governments and organizations. Proposed work 
will include physical improvements to help create a 
mixture of native marsh, permanent and seasonal 
wetlands, and riparian forest through modification of 
existing drainage canals or construction of small 
dikes and weirs to redirect available water sources to 
proposed wetland areas. Also to be included is 
35-26

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
preparation of a flood plain hydraulic management 
model to assess hydraulic impacts of future wetland 
projects proposed in the Yolo Bypass and construction 
of an administrative and maintenance facility. 
Estimated project cost is $16,720,000. Project was 
authorized by the Water Resources Development Act 
(WRDA) of 1986, Public Law 99-662, sec. 1135(b), 
as amended by sec. 304 of WRDA 1990. 
The California State Department of Fish and 
Game is the project sponsor for 3,480 acres located 
within the Yolo Bypass. 
A Project Modification Report and an Environmental 
Assessment/Initial Study was completed in 
April 1992. Three existing sites have been identified 
for possible wetlands restoration: Putah Creek Sink 
(3,000 acres), Yolo Causeway (480 acres) and 
Willow Slough Bypass (345 acres). Willow Slough 
Bypass site was later withdrawn due to difficulty in 
acquiring lands. A flood plain hydraulic management 
model was continued. Local Cooperation 
Agreement (LCA) for Putah Creek Sink site was 
executed on December 23, 1993. 
Fiscal year costs were $1,675,007. 
YOLO WETLANDS BASIN, DAVIS SITE, SACRAMENTO, 
CA (Section 1135) Project Modification 
for Improvement of Environment 
Project is located contiguous to boundaries of Yolo 
Bypass and Willow Slough Bypass, which is a leveed 
tributary of Sacramento River on west side of Yolo 
Bypass. Yolo Bypass and Willow Slough Bypass are 
operative features of the Sacramento River Flood 
Control Project. 
Project will include a 396-acre site that consists of 
212 acres of permanent wetland, 64 acres of riparian 
woodland, 64 acres of grassland/upland, and 56 
acres of seasonal wetland, dikes, roads, gates, ponds 
and islands. Water for wetlands site is available from 
City of Davis waste water treatment plant and from its 
storm drain system. Estimated project cost is 
$6,000,000. 
A previous Davis site was included under Yolo 
Basin Wetlands, Sacramento River project, but was 
withdrawn for consideration by local sponsor due to 
difficulty in obtaining lands. Current project is 
proceeding under authority of sec. 1135(b) of Water 
Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986. 
Project Modification Report was completed at fiscal 
year cost of $38,435. 
SAN LORENZO RIVER, CA 
Project is located within the city limits of Santa 
Cruz, CA, in Santa Cruz County, about 70 miles 
south of city of San Francisco and includes the lower 
2.5 miles of San Lorenzo River which terminates at 
the Pacific Ocean. 
Current plan of improvement for environmental 
restoration includes construction of precast-concrete-
block and sheetpile floodwalls on top of the 
existing levees on both sides of San Lorenzo River 
from the Southern Pacific Railroad bridge to 
Highway 1 bridge, bridge modifications to increase 
flow capacity at Soquel Avenue and Water Street 
bridges, dredging, toe drains, floodproofing county 
buildings and a flood warning system. 
Original San Francisco District final Feasibility 
Cost Sharing Agreement (FCSA) was signed August 
18, 1989. Revised FCSA to complete feasibility 
study was executed on December 22, 1993. Local 
sponsor, city of Santa Cruz, expressed continued 
support for project by letter of January 21, 1994. 
Preconstruction planning was initiated on March 17, 
1994, by Sacramento District. 
Estimated preconstruction planning cost is 
$1,000,000. 
35-27

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
1. Sacramento River 
CA (Federal 
Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
2. Sacramento River 
Deep Water Ship 
Channel, CA 
(Required Contrib. 
Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
3. San Francisco Bay New Work 
to Stockton, CA Approp. 
(John F. Baldwin Cost 
and Stockton Ship 
Channels) 
4. San Joaquin New Work 
River, CA Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
5. Buchanan Dam- New Work 
H.V. Eastman Lake, Approp. 
Chowchilla River, Cost 
CA (Federal Maint. 
Funds) Approp. 
Cost 
(Contrib. Funds, New Work 
Other) Contrib. 
Cost 
6. Cache Creek New Work 
Settling Basin, CA Approp. 
(Federal Funds) Cost 
(Required Contrib. New Work 
Funds) Contrib. 
Cost 
(Contrib. Funds, New Work 
Other) Contrib. 
Cost 
7. Calaveras River New Work 
and Littlejohn Approp. 
Creek and Trib- Cost 
utaries including Maint. 
New Hogan Lake Approp. 
& Farmington Dam, Cost 
CA (Federal Funds) 
- - - - $40,331,192 1 
- - - - 40,331,192 1 
526,400 1,122,618 189,000 558,000 47,507,578 2 
443,966 1,144,951 238,875 520,153 47,414,002 s 
- - - - - 4 
119,443 
-15,000 
39,815 
15,000 
14,578 
2,136,000 
2,770,443 
- 86,000 - 
74,967 61,466 32,785 
- -185,000 -170,000 
1,573 - 22,270 
7,693,651 
2,580,000 
2,561,877 
15,000 
14,578 
835,000 1,026,000 1,300,000 64,649,000 8 
882,769 914,019 1,019,962 64,089,661 7 
- - - - 5,833,117 8 
- - - - 5,833,117 8 
1,096,000 130,000 1,377,245 1,162,000 17,191,382 s 
1,098,445 142,154 1,265,828 1,216,824 17,127,622 9 
- - - - 27,369,597 
- - - - 27,369,597 
1,196,000 1,377,000 1,583,000 1,525,000 18,059,393 
1,224,513 1,342,424 1,566,273 1,464,048 17,929,132 
- - - - 111,187 10 
- - - - 111,187 10 
5,379,000 
7,320,728 
415,000 
622,305 
353,000 
557,361 
500,000 
2,163,932 
164,000 
236,039 
-29,000 
102,592 
- -235,000 10,211,000 
115,825 -245,384 10,117,227 
- - 979,000 
38,169 6,389 943,236 
- - 724,000 11 
16,803 - 676,755 12 
- - - - 23,723,144 13 
- - - - 23,723,144 13 
1,613,000 1,857,000 1,855,400 1,766,000 28,387,111 14 
1.632,124 1,649,971 1,881,016 1,781,777 28,269,145 14 
35-28

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
8. Colorado River at 
Grand Junction, CO 
(Federal Funds) 
(Required Contrib. 
Funds) 
9. Corte Madera 
Creek, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
Required Contrib. 
Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
10. Fairfield Vicinity 
Streams, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Required Contrib. 
Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
11. Guadalupe River, 
CA 
(Required Contrib. 
Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
12. Hidden Dam - 
Hensley Lake, 
Fresno River, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
13. Isabella Lake, Kern 
River, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work: 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp.. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
1,398,251 15 168 17 
1,398,251 15 16 17 
- -25,0 
82,507 24,6 
771,000 
871,404 
475,370 
99,416 
85,000 
119,004 
1,798,000 
1,933,535 
430,000 
5,000 456,700 
- 373,358 
63,000 - 
)00 - - 
i90 -21,551 2,325 
4,260 - 
41 4,341 - 
17,840 - 
17,840 - 
461,700 
373,358 
63,000 
12,458,725 18 
12,439,494 18 
190,355 19 
190,213 19 
804,761 20 
804,761 20 
- -54,000 -35,000 14,744,000 
426,018 -75,768 -40,088 14,693,104 
- - 59,012 592,382 
377,400 - 59,016 592,381 
- - - 3,779,000 21 
30,670 124,997 -4,979 3,770,497 22 
6,026,000 
6,206,897 
-343,000 
86,556 
441,000 
344,491 
12,022,000 6,073,000 
7,804,439 2,499,041 
3,202,000 -291,080 
- 2,004,712 
189,000 3,147,640 
- 2,310,761 
30,250,000 
22,450,196 
2,997,920 
2,091,268 
3,777,640 23 
2,655,252 24 
- - - - 30,555,426 
- - - - 30,555,426 
1,306,000 1,388,000 1,355,700 1,624,000 18,845,518 
1,318,900 1,356,119 1,371,749 1,534,064 18,713,548 
- - - - 165,112 25 
- - - - 165,112 25 
673,000 
683,359 
2,500 
2,575 
931,000 599,000 
876,324 656,706 
- 7,500 
- 5,145 
- 24,450,537 * 
- 24,450,537 2 
673,000 38,333,062 27 28 
633,458 38,280,462 27 28 
- 753,000 
-2,122 747,449 3o 
35-29

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
14. Kaweah and Tule 
Rivers including 
Terminus Dam and 
Success Lake, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
15. Little Dell 
Lake. UT 
(Federal Funds) 
(Required Contrib. 
Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
16. Martis Creek Lake, 
Martis Creek, NV, 
and CA 
17. Merced County 
Streams, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Required Contrib. 
Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
18. Merced County 
Stream Group, CA 
19. Pajaro River Basin, 
CA (Federal Funds) 
(Required Contrib. 
Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
20. Pine Flat Lake and 
Kings River, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
2,583,853 2,811,795 
2,629,169 2,758,093 
- 5,000 
3,135 6,683 
5,884,000 
8,121,629 
4,400,000 
5,009,731 
1,841,000 
729,187 
2,400,000 
2,497,590 
1,259 
- - 34,997,230 31 
- - 34,997,230 31 
3,561,200 4,253,000 45,172,874 2 
3,487,774 3,831,247 44,555,895 = 
- - 198,000 33 34 
61 - 197,578 3 s 
-300,000 
415,779 
550,000 
545,564 
-20,318 
- 
500,000 
723,860 
480,000 
356,950 
36,099,900 
35,359,340 
19,480,000 
18,834,566 
4,300,147 36 
4,300,147 37 
- - - - 8,504,989 M 
- - - - 8,504,989 " 
291,500 359,000 422,000 629,000 6,853,383 
313,889 337,282 418,835 648,017 6,832,915 
2,100,000 
3,034,139 
430,000 
291,000 
707,125 
969,395 
1,356,000 
1,325,185 
80,000 
139,000 
115,496 
319,584 
1,348,000 
1,509,149 
80,000 
480,000 
1,275,048 
599,000 17,248,000 
463,374 17,035,289 
- 510,000 
- 510,000 
285,272 4,440,393 a 
65,590 4,113,349 " 
- - - - 2,571,259 4 
- - - - 2,571,259 40 
117,000 135,000 197,000 146,000 2,607,840 
135,193 118,923 162,155 176,222 2,577,314 
18,798 
989 
18,883 
6,046 
2,770 
960 
51 
- 8,206,968 41 
1,930 8,206,471 41 
- 610,000 
102 568,460 
- 37,250 42 
- 34,323 a 
- - - - 43,356,265 " 
- - - - 43,356,265 " 
1.916,000 1,917,000 1,928,900 4,125,764 36,651,046 45 
1,943,666 ' 1.929,273 1,869,514 3,996,316 36,428,031 46 
35-30

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
110,000 48 
110,000 4 
21. Redbank and New Work 
Fancher Creeks, CA Approp. 
(Federal Funds) Cost 
(Required Contrib. New Work 
Funds) Contrib. 
Cost 
(Contrib. Funds, New Work 
Other) Contrib. 
Cost 
10,471,000 
9,844,812 
425,000 
449,417 
135,000 
156,516 
6,878,000 800,000 
9,023,270 832,066 
247,000 -8,500 
285,420 2,796 
- 8,500 
38,618 23,134 
450,000 
549,457 
3,920 
-5,190 
-3,900 
47,056,065 47 
47,003,367 47 
3,254,920 
3,176,575 
759,600 48 
705,566 48 
22. Russian River Basin, 
CA, Coyote Valley 
Dam (Lake 
Mendocino) and 
Channel Improvements 
(Federal 
Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
Dry Creek (Warm 
Springs) Lake 
and Channel 
Improvements, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
23. Sacramento River 
and Tributaries, CA 
from Collinsville to 
Shasta Dam 
(Federal Funds) 
(Required Contrib. 
Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
24. Walnut Creek, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Required Contrib. 
Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, 
Other) 
25. Wildcat and San 
Pablo Creeks, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
- 14,435,869 49 
- 14,435,869 49 
2,175,000 2,487,000 
2,158,612 2,438,883 
12,386 329,114 
12,444 8,721 
5,217,000 
3,291,802 
2,579,000 
2,705,031 
12,400 
- 
1,234,000 
1,750,674 
1,402,000 
1,452,100 
-29,434 
156,109 
39,434 
62,949 
300,000 
839,262 
25,000 
52,958 
259,457 
31,614 
1,067,000 
893,311 
900,000 
3,148,408 
2,708,000 
2,636,918 
12,400 
2,201,000 
2,324,005 
1,580,000 
1,551,873 
63,000 
489,903 
15,000 
12,008 
2,318,500 2,516,000 42,336,924 so 
2,324,765 2,407,709 42,140,618 0s5o1 
313,695 
3,400,000 
3,877,691 
2,588,900 
2,599,714 
589,911 62 
570,774 63 
741,000 
889,811 
3,284,000 
2,236,709 
333,023,645 54 
332,957,191 64 
29,856,043 6s 
28,694,939 s6 
230,574 67 
228,732 68 
2,654,000 
2,603,331 
1,454,200 
1,487,843 
930,000 
387,030 
15,000 
24,468 
1,150,000 200,000 
1,192,099 195,629 
60,300 
18,112 
3,900,000 
3,434,929 
1,649,000 
1,623,025 
190,000 
707,149 
5,500 
5,533 
128,524,000 6 
127,684,653 o 
25,821,128 61 
25,761,148 81 
24,348,404 
24,104,152 
2,921,796 62 63 
2,921,770 62 63 64 
- 71,392,430 as 
-67,615 71,319,947 66 
- - 5,612,681 67 
5,173 -16,800 5,595,500 6 
- - 14,854,344 69 
- 212,900 14,783,553 6 
408,000 2,510,000 4,057,000 19,836,000 
614,839 2,477,730 2,978,994 18,704,539 
35-31

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
(Required Contrib. New Work 
Funds) Contrib. - - 40,000 485,000 1,384,662 
Cost 43,293 34,627 283,598 399,235 1,287,549 
(Contrib. Funds, New Work 
Other) Contrib. - - -40,000 170,000 1,796,000 70 
Cost - - - 65,000 1,647,383 71 
29. Lower San New Work 
Joaquin River Approp. 3,651,000 904,000 64,000 150,000 372,790,379 72 73 
and Tributaries, Cost 2,669,051 2,326,274 1,571,821 706,876 370,977,997 T3 
CA including Maint. 
Tuolumne and Approp. 798,000 845,000 841,000 1,079,000 9,687,316 
Stanislaus Rivers, Cost 827,141 776,081 859,828 1,087,982 9,626,384 
CA, New Melones 
Lake, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds, New Work 
Other) Contrib. - - - - 80,000 74 
Cost 67,415 - - - 80,000 74 
1. Includes the following amounts for new work: 
Regular Funds: Previous project, $185,198; existing 
project, $585,436 for shallow-draft and $39,560,558 
for deep-draft. 
2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: 
Regular Funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing 
project, ,$16,597,432 for shallow-draft and 
$30,286,426 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance 
funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 
3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: 
Regular Funds: Previous project, $552,720; existing 
project, $16,551,184 for shallow-draft and 
$30,239,098 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance 
funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 
4. Includes $85,000 contributed funds, other, from 
Sacramento-Yolo Port District for clearing and grubbing 
on dredged material deposit areas to be used on ship 
channel maintenance dredging work. 
5. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation 
of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of 
September 30, 1985 ($33,474) for Sacramento River 
Deep Water Ship Channel to be included in project cost 
(for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 
6. Includes $28,204,800 funds for Sacramento 
District and $35,444,200 for San Francisco District. 
7. Includes $28,179,500 costs for Sacramento 
District and $35,910,162 for San Francisco District. 
8. Includes $S1,158,348 public work funds, of which 
$207,198 was for work done along 30-foot channel in 
Suisun Bay Channel; excludes $19,000 expended for 
engineering for inactive portion of 1950 modification. 
In addition, $ 1.342.500 was expended from required 
contributed funds. 
9. In addition, S1,250 was expended from required 
contributed funds for maintenance. 
10. Contributed funds, other, from State of 
California for design and construction of downstream 
channel improvements on Ash and Berenda Sloughs 
below Buchanan Dam. 
11. Includes $724,000 contributed funds, other, 
from State of California for relocation activities 
including demolition or salvage of various pipes and 
facilities, construction of ramps, turnouts, pipe gates 
and bank protection at Cache Creek Settling Basin. 
12. Includes $676,755 contributed funds, other, 
costs for relocation activities for State of California. 
13. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation 
facilities at New Hogan Lake: total to date $897,742. 
14. Includes $99,000 special recreation use fees and 
costs at New Hogan Lake, and $826,600 maintenance 
and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at 
New Hogan Lake beginning in FY 1988. 
15. For miscellaneous construction under local 
cooperation requirements, primarily for Bear Creek, 
San Joaquin County; includes $10,056 as related to 
Duck and Littlejohn Creeks channel improvements as 
part of Farmington Dam project unit. 
16. Includes $393,195 contributed funds, other, 
from California Department of Boating and Waterways 
for design and construction of boat launching and 
related facilities, and $30,000 for design and 
construction of a boarding float at North Shore 
recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 
17. Includes $104,000 contributed funds, other, and 
costs from Calaveras County Water District for New 
Hogan hydropower studies. 
18. Includes $6,999,725 San Francisco District 
construction funds and costs for Corte Madera Creek. 
19. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to 
Sacramento District in FY 1983. Includes $97,400 San 
Francisco District required contributed funds and costs. 
20. Contributed funds, other, and costs, from Marin 
35-32

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
County including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge 
and road relocations and $267,840 for additional 
expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 
21. Includes $3,643,000 contributed funds, other, 
from the State of California for relocations (automotive 
type bridges) at Laurel Creek Diversion near Fairfield, 
$23,000 from City of Fairfield for Phase III contract for 
channel development on Laurel Creek, and $113,000 
from City of Suisun for Phase IIA contract for widening 
of Railroad Avenue. 
22. Includes $3,638,022 contributed funds, other, 
costs for relocations at Laurel Creek Diversion, $19,537 
contributed funds, other costs for Phase III contract, 
and $112,939 for Phase IIA contract. 
23. Includes contributed funds, other: $2,217,000 
for recreation betterment, $1,374,440 for NED 
relocations and $70,000 for incremental relocations at 
Guadalupe River. 
24. Includes contributed funds, other costs: 
$1,541,269 for recreation betterment, $1,113,983 for 
NED relocations and $0 for incremental relocations at 
Guadalupe River. 
25. Contributed funds, other from the State of 
California for miscellaneous design and construction at 
Hidden Dam. 
26. Includes $2,199,085 Code 710 funds and costs 
for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake and $224,000 
Code 713 funds and costs for improvement at Tillie 
Creek and Live Oak campgrounds. 
27. Includes $407,640 special recreation use fees 
and costs at Isabella Lake. 
28. Includes $131,900 maintenance and operation 
of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at Isabella Lake 
beginning in FY 1985. 
29. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, 
from California Department of Boating and Waterways 
for design and construction of boat launching and 
related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella 
Peninsula and $337,500 for Isabella Dam hydropower 
studies. 
30. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, 
costs for boat launching and related facilities at Old 
Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula, and $309,539 
costs for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 
31. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation 
facilities: Success Lake: Total to date $747,048. 
Terminus Dam: Total to date: $704,000. 
32. Includes $165,000 special recreation use fees 
and costs at Success Lake. 
33. Includes contributed funds, other, from State of 
California Department of Boating and Waterways and 
costs for acquisition of a boarding float at Success Lake, 
$30,000 and at Terminus Dam, $12,420. 
34. Includes contributed funds, other, from Kaweah 
River Power Authority, Visalia, California for Terminus 
Dam hydropower studies, $423,000; and from DIT', 
Inc., Paris, France, for Success Lake hydropower 
studies, $168,000. 
35. Includes contributed funds, other, costs for 
Terminus Dam hydropower studies, $422,344, and for 
Success Lake hydropower studies, $167,579. 
36. Includes $4,300,147 contributed funds, other 
from the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City 
for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 
37. Includes $4,300,147 contributed funds, other, 
costs for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell 
Lake, 
38. Includes $1,200 initiation of plans and 
specifications for Code 710 recreation facilities, for FY 
1978. Construction of recreation facilities at Martis 
Creek Lake under Code 720 was determined to be 
infeasible. 
39. Includes contributed funds, other, for lands, 
easements and rights-of-way for Castle Dam from State 
of California. 
40. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work 
from contributed funds, other, miscellaneous 
construction under local cooperation requirements as 
related to acquisition of right-of-way and utility 
alterations for Merced County Stream Group. 
41. Includes $1,949,968 San Francisco construction 
funds and costs and $260,000 Sacramento general 
investigation funds and costs for Pajaro River. 
42. Includes $37,250 contributed funds, other, from 
Santa Clara Valley Water District for bridge relocation 
at Pajaro River. 
43. Includes $34,323 contributed funds, other, costs 
for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 
44. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation 
facilities at Pine Flat Lake: Total to date: $1,595,100. 
Includes Public Work Acceleration, Executive (PL 
87-658) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 
funds and costs ($239,235) for recreation facilities and 
$19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish 
barrier. 
45. Includes' $158,300 special recreation fees and 
costs at Pine Flat Lake and $699,785 maintenance and 
operation of dam funds and costs at Pine Flat Dam. 
46. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and 
design services anon-project) accomplished at expense 
of State of "California under local cooperation 
requirements in connection with acquisition of 
rights-of-way and utility alterations at Pine Flat Lake. 
47. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation 
of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of 
September 30, 1985 ($29,065) and FY 1986 allocation 
for Redbank and Fancher Creeks to be included in 
project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 
1985. 
48. Includes contributed funds, other, from Fresno 
Metropolitan Flood Control District for road relocation 
and betterments (Nees Avenue) at Fancher Dam. 
49. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds; 
$400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects 
funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and 
$1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed 
projects funded under Code 711 at Coyote Valley Dam, 
Lake Mendocino. 
50. Includes $94,459 special recreation use fees and 
costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special 
recreation fees and cost for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake 
Mendocino. 
51. Includes $1,625,280 maintenance and operation 
of dam funds and costs at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake 
Mendocino for FY 1985 through FY 1995. 
52. Includes $251,911 contributed funds, other 
from City of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake 
Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $338,000 from 
35-33

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
California Department of Boating and Waterways for 
launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 
53. Includes $250,117 contributed funds, other, 
costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, 
hydropower studies; and $320,657 for California 
Department of Boating and Waterways for launching 
facility at Lake Mendocino. 
54. Includes $253,421,793 San Francisco construction 
funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry 
Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 
55. Includes $964,114 San Francisco maintenance 
funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, 
Warm Springs Dam. 
56. Includes $75,400 maintenance and operation of 
dam funds and costs at Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 
57. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, 
from Sonoma County for Dry Creek, Warm Springs, 
hydropower studies; and $22,500 from City of Ukiah 
for hatchery pump design at Lake Mendocino. 
58. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, 
costs for Dry Creek, Warm Springs hydropower studies; 
and $20,658 costs for hatchery pump design. 
59. Excludes $614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron 
Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5, 1977, and 
$531,000 for Sacramento River and Major and Minor 
Tributaries portions which are considered inactive and 
deferred. 
60. Includes Code 710 funds and cost for recreation 
facilities at Black Butte lake: Total to date $1,000,162. 
61. Includes $104,100 special recreation use fees 
and costs at Black Butte Lake. 
62. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and 
design services (non-project) accomplished at expense 
of State of California under local cooperation 
requirements in connection with acquisition of 
rights-of-way and utility alterations (primarily for 
Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries 
project). Includes State Highway Commission payment, 
$789,008, for use of excess excavation from Chico and 
Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and 
Major and Minor Tributaries) for freeway embankment 
through city of Chico. 
63. Includes $41,984 contributed funds, other, from 
State of California for required modification of existing 
private facilities and salmon rearing habitat, Sacramento 
River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; $15,977 contributed 
funds, other, from State of California Department of 
Boating and Waterways for replacing a boarding float at 
Orland Buttes boat launching ramp at Black Butte Lake; 
$380,500 contributed funds, other, from the City of 
Santa Clara for hydropower studies at Black Butte Lake; 
and $59,334 contributed funds, other from State of 
California for relocations. 
64. Includes $385,974 contributed funds, other, 
costs for Black Butte hydropower studies; and $59,334 
costs for relocations. 
65. Includes $8,849,825 San Francisco construction 
funds for Walnut Creek. 
66. Includes $9,049,609 San Francisco construction 
costs for Walnut Creek. 
67. Includes $450,268 San Francisco required funds 
for Walnut Creek. 
68. Includes $525,846 San Francisco required costs 
for Walnut Creek. 
69. Includes $400,348 San Francisco contributed 
funds, other, and contributed funds costs for Walnut 
Creek. 
70. Includes $1,796,000 contributed funds, other, 
from Contra Costa Flood Control and Water 
Conservation District for replacement of sewerline in 
Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 
71. Includes $1,647,383 contributed funds, other, 
costs for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for 
Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 
72. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this 
basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and 
Tributaries, and Tuolomne River Basin, California). 
(See Table 35-E). 
73. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 
1957 Economic Feasibility Report and of Revised 
Feasibility Report (FY 1960, 1961, and 1962) 
applicable to 1962 reauthorization of project. 
74. Includes $80,000 contributed funds, other, and 
costs, from the Bureau of Reclamation for visitors center 
at Mark Twain area, New Melones Lake. 
35-34

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep 30, 1995 1 2 
American River New Work 
Watershed CA, Approp. $1,600,000 2,542,000 4,850,000 3,780,000 $12,772,000 
Cost 1,177,627 2,952,122 4,834,610 3,500,283 12,464,642 
Caliente Creek, CA New Work 
Approp. - - - - 60,000 
Cost 9 - - - 60,000 
Coyote and Berryessa New Work 
Creeks, CA Approp. 885,000 1,016,000 - 0 4,410,000 
Cost 835,620 1,307,497 83,843 1 4,409,999 
Napa River, CA New Work 
Approp. 2,000,000 850,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 8,473,000 s 
Cost 1,933,885 1,119,968 1,422,351 1,432,375 8,296,766 s 
San Lorenzo River, New Work 
CA Approp. - 170,800 479,000 649,800 
Cost 169,928 454,285 624,213 
Truckee Meadows, New Work 
NV Approp. -307,000 -15,570 100 - 3,787,530 
Cost 67,736 7,121 7,439 - 3,787,530 
Upper Jordan New Work 
River, CA Approp. 375,000 - 50,000 292,000 1,442,000 
Cost 346,138 170,182 91,850 258,987 1,397,281 
West Sacramento, New Work 
CA Approp. - 525,000 1,040,000 252,000 1,817,000 4 
Cost - 496,395 1,035,889 284,343 1,816,627 4 
1. Beginning in FY 1982, Advance Engineering 
and Design (Preconstruction, Engineering and Design) 
programs are funded under General Investigations 
Appropriations. 
2. Includes FY 1985 unobligated carryover and 
FY 1986 allocation for CP&E funds and all AE&D 
funds to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) 
per TWX of September 9, 1985. 
3. Excludes $2,639,955 funds and costs for a 
previous flood control project on Napa River. (See 
Table 35-E.) 
4. Previously studied under Sacramento Metropolitan 
Area, Northern California Streams, CA. Funds 
transferred from American River Watershed. 
35-35

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 35-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 3, 1899 
July 25, 1912 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 26, 1937 
July 24, 1946 
Nov. 17, 1987 
9. 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Nov. 7, 1966 
Nov. 17, 1986 
23. 
May 17. 1950 
Feb. 10. 1956 
1. 
35-36 
SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA 
A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento. H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., 
works. 2d sess., and 48, 55th 
Cong., 3d sess. (Annual 
Report 1898, p. 2844 
and 1899, p. 3171). 
For work above Sacramento. H. Doc. 76, 62d Cong., 
1st sess. 1 
The 10-foot channel up to Sacramento. H. Doc. 123, 69th Cong., 
1st sess. 
A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa Rivers and Harbors 
and 5 feet between Colusa and Chico Landing Committee Doc. 35, 
at a cost of $390,000 provided flow of rivers 73d Cong., 2d sess. 
is increased to minimum flow of 5,000 cubic 
feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. 
Authority for a special direct participation of Rivers and Harbors 
Federal Government of $12 million in cost Committee Doc. 35, 
of Shasta Reservoir. 73d Cong., 2d sess. 
Transfer of authority for expenditure of above $12 
million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the 
Interior. 
Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 
River, CA, to provide for construction of a ship 2d sess. 
channel 30 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide 
from deep water in Suisun Bay to Washington Lake, 
including such works as may be necessary to compensate 
for or alleviate any detrimental salinity 
conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular 
basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 feet 
at Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet 
deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, 
thence to Sacramento River. 
Deauthorization of shallow-draft channel, Colusa Sec. 1002, 1986 WRDA 
to Red Bluff, feature of project for navigation, 
Sacramento River, California. 
CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA 
Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles H. Doc. 545, 87th Cong., 
of Corte Madera Creek and tributaries, as 2d sess. 
modified by Chief of Engineers. 
Local cooperation requirements modified to Sec. 204, 1966 Flood 
provide 1.5 percent cash contribution toward Control Act. 
cost of Ross Valley unit. 
Modify existing project to direct construction of Unit Sec. 823, 1986 WRDA 
4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake 
Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing 
measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road 
Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed 
portions of authorized project. Further modify 
project to eliminate any channel modifications 
upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. 
RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA 
Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel H. Doc. 585, 81st Cong., 
improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River 2d sess. 
and lower reaches of tributaries. 
Increased appropriation authorization for initial PL 404, 84th Cong., 
stage of project development. 2d sess.

TABLE 35-B (Cont'd) 
SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Mar. 7, 1974 
Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel 
Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. 
Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; 
compensate for fish losses on the Russian River 
which may be attributed to the operation of the 
Coyote Dam component of the project through 
measures such as possible expansion of the 
capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm 
Springs Dam component of the project. 
H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 
2d sess. 
Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA 
24. 
Dec. 22, 1944 
May 17, 1950 
July 3, 1958 
July 3, 1958 
July 14, 1960 
May 12, 1967 
Mar. 7, 1974 
June 19, 1975 
SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, 
CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA 
DAM 
Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., 
to provide for extensions in levees and other 2d sess. 2 
structures along Sacramento River and major 
and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte 
Dam and Reservoir; construct low-level Table 
Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power 
facilities; and provision of monetary authorization 
of $15 million for initiation of modification. 
Improvements for protection of Upper Butte Basin H. Doc. 367, 81st Cong., 
included full -monetary authorization). 1st sess. 2 
Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., 
Project to Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning 2d sess. 2 
area below dam and modification of project by 
construction of bank protection and incidental 
channel improvements between Chico Landing 
and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). 
Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive 
plan approved in act of December 22, 
1944. 
Further modification of Sacramento River Flood S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., 
Control Project by construction of initial 10- 
year phase of bank erosion control works and 
setback levees on Sacramento River and 
authorization of $14,240,000 for prosecution 
of modification. 
Additional authorization of $7 million for bank PL 90-17 
protection approved in act of July 14, 1960. 
Initiation of construction of second phase of bank PL 93-251 
erosion control works and setback levees on 
Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14, 
1960, and additional authorization of $16 
million for such purpose. ' 
Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and H. Doc. 94-192, 94th 
Reservoir. a Cong., 1st sess. 
1. Contains latest published map of section above 
Sacramento. For map of section below Sacramento, see 
H. Doc. 1123, 60th Cong., 2d sess. and S. Doc. 142, 
79th Cong., 2d sess. 
2. Contains latest published map. 
3. Total monetary authorization available, exclusive 
of preauthorization studies from general investigations 
appropriations, amounts to $72,740,000. 
4. The 90-day Congressional project review 
period, required by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by 
sec. 157, PL 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and 
resulted in deauthorization of project unit. 
35-37

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 35-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Feather River, CA 1951 - $ 5,7521 2 
Middle River and Connecting 
Channels, CA Completed 1974 $ 8,3543 93,4944 
Mokelumne River, CA Completed 1974 8,500 189,152 
Navajo Reservoir, NM Completed - 2,132s 8 - 
Old River, CA Completed 1970 23,185 7 631,128 
Stockton and Mormon 
Channels, CA Completed 1970 253,1518 218,854 
Suisun Bay Channel, CA Completed 1974 200,928 o1101 3,316,62212 13 
Suisun Channel, CA Completed 1973 217,677 733,48913 14 
Suisun Point Channel, CA Completed 1965 191,728 s 15 - 
1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for 
commerce. 
2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous 
project. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and 
$3,840 for existing project for maintenance expended 
from contributed funds. 
3. Includes $1,600 for previous project. 
4. Includes $790 for previous project. 
5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under 
authority of sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. 
6. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District 
in FY 1968. 
7. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,600 for 
lands, damages and public landings. Remaining portion 
of project, consisting of side channel at Orwood and 
completion of project channels from mouth of Old River 
to Lammers Ferry road and from Crocker Cut to Holly 
Sugar Factory was deauthorized November 17, 1986, by 
WRDA of 1986. 
8. Upon completion of Mormon Slough, 
Calaveras River, CA in February 1970, local interests 
accepted maintenance responsibility for Mormon 
Slough as well as for Stockton and Mormon Channels 
CA, and Federal maintenance was discontinued. No 
Federal maintenance costs have been incurred since FY 
1969. 
9. Includes $58,901 for previous project. 
10. Excludes $59,551 expended from required 
contributed funds for previous project. 
11. Excludes work accomplished under existing 
project at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works 
Administration funds allotted to San Joaquin River, CA. 
12. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. 
Excludes $5,449 expended from required contributed 
funds for previous project. 
13. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San 
Francisco District, January 1, 1974. 
14. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys 
of $5,496 and $483 for fiscal year 1963 and 1964, 
respectively. 
15. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was 
$12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. 
35-38

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 35-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Alameda Creek, CA Completed 
American River, CA Completed 
Aquatic Plant Control, CA Completed 
Big Dry Creek Dam and 
diversion, CA Completed 
Big Wash, Milford, Beaver 
County, UT Completed 
Burch Creek, Weber County, UT 
Cache Creek Basin, CA Active/no FY 95 
(Outlet Channel) expenditure 
Chester, CA Active/no FY 95 
expenditure 
Cottonwood Creek, CA Active/no FY 95 
expenditure 
Coyote Creek, CA Completed 
Duck Creek, San Joaquin 
County, CA Completed 
East Weaver Creek, CA Completed 
Folsom Lake, American River, CA Completed 
Green Valley Creek, Solano 
County, CA Completed 
Kays Creek, UT Completed 
Kern River-California Aqueduct 
Intertie, CA Completed 
Klamath River, CA Completed 
Lake Camanche, CA Completed 
Lake Oroville, CA Completed 
Lower San Joaquin River and 
Tributaries, including Tuolumne 
and Stanislaus Rivers, CA Completed 
Marysville Lake, CA Active/no FY 95 
expenditure 
Merced River, CA Completed 
Middle Creek, CA Completed 
Mormon Slough, CA Completed 
Napa River Basin, CA Active/no FY 95 
expenditure 
New Bullards Bar, CA Completed 
North Fork, Pit River at 
Alturas, CA Completed 
Pinole Creek, CA Completed 
Redwood Creek, Humboldt 
County, CA Completed 
Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV Completed 
Rheem Creek, CA Completed 
Rodeo Creek, CA Completed 
Salinas River, CA Inactive 
Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT Completed 
San Leandro Creek, CA Completed 
San Lorenzo Creek, CA Completed 
San Lorenzo River, CA Completed 
Sevier River near Redmond, UT Completed 
Sonoma Creek, CA Inactive 
Truckee River and tributaries, Active/no FY 95 
CA and NV expenditure 
1978 
1959 
1967 
1955 
1961 
1964 
1993 
1981 
1991 
1968 
1967 
1965 
1957 
1963 
1973 
1977 
1972 
1976 
1981 
1976 
1980 
1976 
1967 
1976 
1979 
1972 
1974 
1968 
1970 
1969 
1962 
1966 
1952 
1961 
1973 
1962 
1966 
1952 
1973 
1968 
$26,995,350 
2,125,8 18 3 
1,000 
1,369,9314 
217,879 6 6 
26,049s 
- 7 
3,570,0008 
15,765,000 
705,622 1 s 
664,825 9 
220,636 1 s5 10 
63,014,81011 
136,026 5 12 
407,989 s 13 
1,503,073 s 14 
4,838,000 1 
10,252,950 16 
70,425,470 18 
27,835,263 17 
- 18 
10,918,796 19 
2,643,49920 
2,965,40221 
2,639,955 122 
12,890,62523 
904,278 5 24 25 
885,750 1 5 
4,620,070 1 26 
133,339 s 27 
400,000 1 5 28 
974,100 1 5 
94,213 1 29 
1,227,570 o 
1,000,000 1 31 
5,130,8211 32 
4,314,406 1 33 
919,000 4 
781,500' 36 
1,038,960 
35-39 
$54,778 1 2

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 35-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
1. Project responsibility transferred from San 
Francisco District to Sacramento District April 1, 1982. 
2. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 
3. Excludes $54,919 other contributed funds for 
miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to 
requirements of local cooperation were $951,000 
(1959) for lands and relocations. 
4. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for 
construction in connection with bridge construction 
pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total 
cost to local interests for all requirements of local 
cooperation was $370,000 (1959) for lands and 
relocations. 
5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under 
authority of sec. 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 
6. Excludes $22,000 for preauthorization studies. 
7. Project not economically feasible; preconstruction 
planning was terminated in FY 1993. 
8. Excludes $69,262 other contributed funds from 
State of California for two low water crossings and 
appurtenances at Chester. A fish ladder modification 
project was continued under sec. 1135 in FY 1995 at 
fiscal year cost of $172,565. 
9. Excludes $50,000 for preauthorization studies. 
Estimated costs to local interests were $665,000 for 
lands and damages including relocations. 
10. Includes $174,938 Public Works Acceleration 
Program Funds. 
11. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 
1956 for operation and maintenance by that agency in 
conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. 
12. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies. 
13. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. 
Estimated costs (FY 1973) to local interests for all 
requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for 
lands and damages including relocations. 
14. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. 
Non-Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for 
road relocation was $18,260 (required contributed 
funds). 
15. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility 
District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made 
July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs 
$34,988,536. 
16. Constructed by State of California. Final 
Federal contribution of $64,186 was made on 
February 9, 1981 (total $69,994,105) for flood control 
reservation. 
17. Cherry Valley and New Don Pedro Reservoirs 
constructed by local interests. Federal contributions of 
$9,000,000 and $5,464,000, respectively, for flood 
control reservation. Final Federal contribution of 
$308.898 was made on January 18, 1972, for New Don 
Pedro. Excludes $3,004.946, contributed funds, other, 
for miscellaneous engineering and construction (nonproject) 
at local interest expense under local cooperation 
requirements for acquisition of rights-of-way for 
levee and channel improvements on Lower San Joaquin 
River and tributaries. Unconstructed portion of snagging 
and clearing project modification of Lower San Joaquin 
River and Tributraries) was classified as "deferred" on 
April 9, 1993. For full report see Annual Report for FY 
1993. 
18. Planning and any future development is 
uncertain awaiting State of California's position on 
support of Marysville project. 
19. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District, Final 
Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, 
1975 (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation. 
20. Estimated costs (FY 1967) to local interests for 
all requirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 
for lands and damages including relocations. 
21. Non-Federal cost $2,965,402 (FY 1976) for 
lands and relocations. Federal contribution of $599,336 
made to State Reclamation Board. 
22. This project was reclassified as "active" on 
August 3, 1987. 
23. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. 
Final Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in FY 
1972 (total $12,759,127) for flood control reservation. 
24. Includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. 
25. Excludes $146,000 other contributed funds for 
miscellaneous construction and engineering and design 
services under local cooperation requirements in 
connection with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation, 
and utility alterations. 
26. Includes $107,000 costs for remedial work to 
drainage system completed in FY 1977. 
27. Includes $19,000 for preauthorization studies. 
28. Excludes $52,549 contributed funds. 
29. Cost includes engineering and design prior to 
June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 (FY 1962 - 1963) to 
determine if project classification to an active category 
was justified. 
30. Estimated costs to local interests for all 
requirements of local cooperation were $463,000 (July 
1962) for lands and damages including relocations. 
Project prevented $4,544,000 in damages from the 
April-May 1994 snowmelt runoff. 
31. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 
32. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work 
performed in lieu of cash contribution. 
33. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 
34. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds 
toward first cost. Costs to local interests for all 
requirements of local cooperation, including required 
contributions, were $118,000 (1951). Project prevented 
$9,000 in damages from the April-May 1994 
snowmelt runoff. 
35. Placed inactive 1974. 
35-40

TABLE 35-G 
SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Date Funds Funds 
Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Alhambra Creek, CA 1981 1986 $ 300,000 - 
Bear River, CA 1980 1986 - - 
Eel River, CA 1971 1986 1,272,816 - 
Gleason Creek, NV 1977 1986 215,826 - 
Humboldt River and 
Tributaries, NV 1982 1986 1,532,932 - 
Lakeport Lake, CA 1 1976 1993 2,353,000 - 
Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT 1951 1977 - - 
Mad River Basin, CA 1973 1986 4,243,750 - 
Spanish Fork River, UT 1955 1977 20,000 - 
Weber River and Tributaries, UT 1974 1972 75,120 - 
(Morgan County) 
1. Lakeport Lake was deauthorized on 
November 17, 1986; reauthorized November 17, 1988; 
and deauthorized November 18, 1993. 
TABLE 35-H SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: 
TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING 
(See Section 1 of Text) 
Range in Feet 
Miles from Mean Extreme Ordinary Extreme 
Mouth of Tidal 1 Tidal 2 Flood a Flood 4 
Place River 
Collinsville 0 4.3 7 8 10 
Sacramento 59 2.0 2 3 20 28 
Verona (Mouth of Feather River) 80 - Trace 22 30 
Colusa 144 - - 26 32 
Chico Landing 193 - - 20 25 
Red Bluff 248 - - 24 30 
1. Mean lower low water to mean higher high 
water. 
2. Tide at low water season only. 
3. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 
4. Extreme low water to indicated flood condition. 
35-41

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 35-I SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: 
TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT 
(See Section 4 of Text) 
Federal Non-Federal 2 
Modification 
Corps of 
Engineers 
(Construction) 
Coast 
Guard 
(Construction) 
Required 
Cash 
Contribution 
Lands and 
Damages (including 
Relocations) 
Total Total 
Project 
Prior to 1950 
Modification $4,009,938 $80,000 $1,307,500 $1,042,000 $2,349,500 $6,439,438 
1950 Modification 1,823,179 - 35,000 135,000 170,000 1,993,170 
Total $5,833,117 $80,000 $1,342,500 $1,177,000 $2,519,500 $8,432,617 
1. Completed in May 1960. 
2. Excludes $5,865,000 (Feb. 1954) local interests 
costs for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal 
facilities required under terms of project authorization. 
TABLE 35-J SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: 
PROJECT UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND 
EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST 
(See Section 4 of Text) 
Non-Federal 
Federal Required Lands and 
Corps of Cash Damages (includ- Total 
Unit Engineers Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project 
Settling Basin above head 
of Burns Cutoff 1 $1,073,000 $ 30,000 $ 200,000 $ 230,000 $1,303,000 
Burns Cutoff improvement; 
new turning basin; dredging 
Mormon Channel 2 5 7,882,0003 431,000 1,455,000 1,886,000 9,768,000 
Upper Stockton Channel 
enlargement 4 s 535,000 34,000 15,000 49,000 584,000 
1. July 1959 price index. Deauthorized August 5, 
1977.
2. Deferred; July 1960 price index. 
3. For lands and construction. 
4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act 
authorization of San Francisco Bay to Stockton 
Channel, Sacramento District, Improvement No. 3. 
5. Deauthorized November 17, 1986. 
35-42 
~I I

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 35-K MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA, 
MAXIMUM INFLOW, STORAGE, AND OUTFLOW FOR PROJECTS 
(See Section 18 of Text) 
Maximum 
Inflow Maximum Maximum 
(c. f.s.) Storage Outflow 
Stream (hourly) (acre-feet) (c.f.s.) 
Burns 3,976 1,777 1,629 
Bear 5,611 4,648 1,743 
Owens 2,539 2,462 169 
Mariposa 9,074 13,473 1,090 
TABLE 35-L RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED 
COST FOR NEW WORK 
(See Section 22 of Text) 
Estimated Cost 
Non-Federal 
Project Feature Federal Contribution Total 
Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): 
Channel Improvements below Dam 
on lower 98 miles of Russian River $ 14,436,000 $ 5,598,000 $ 20,034,000 1 
Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and 
Channel Improvements below Dam 259,240,000 103,777,000 2 363,017,000 
Total $273,676,000 $109,375,000 $383,051,000 
1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities 
at completed projects. 
2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal 
Government for costs allocated to water supply storage 
to be paid over a period not to exceed 50 years after use 
of storage is initiated and inclusive of lands and 
damages. 
35-43

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 35-M RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: PROJECT 
FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS 
(See Section 22 of Text) 
Height of Reservoir 
Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated 
Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ft) Cost 
Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Ukiah Mile 0.8-East Fork 160 Feet- 122,500 $ 17,550,000 1 
Mendocino) of Russian River Earthfill 
Channel Improvements (East Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East - - 2,484,000 
Fork) Fork 
below Coyote Valley Dam Guerneville Mile 0 to 98, Russian - -- 
and lower 98 miles of River 
Russian River) 
Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek 319 Feet- 381,000 363,017,000 
Earthfill 
Channel Improvements (Dry Healdsburg Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry - - 2,864,000 
Creek) below Dry Creek Creek 
(Warm Springs Dam) 
1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities 
at completed projects. 
TABLE 35-N SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, 
COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: 
PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST ESTIMATE 
(See Section 23 of Text) 
Current Estimated Cost 
Unit Classification Federal Non-Federal 1 Total 
1944 Modification: 
Antelope Creek 2 Inactive $1,400,000 $ 340,000 $1,740,000 
Lower Butte Basin 3 Deferred 7,286,000 2,285,000 9,571,000 
Thomas Creek 2 Deferred 1,140,000 140,000 1,280,000 
Willow Creek 2 Inactive 1,290,000 120,000 1,410,000 
Bypass Levees a Deferred 7,100,000 940,000 8,040,000 
Bypass Levees a Inactive 3,010,000 - 3,010,000 
1950 Modification: 
Upper Butte Basin 2 Deferred 3,530,000 1,787,000 5,317,000 
1. For lands and damages, including relocations. 
2. July 1960 price level. 
3. Excludes work applicable to extension of 
Moulton weir (July 1954 price level). 
4. July 1961 price level. 
35-44

SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 35-0 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, 
FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: 
CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS 
(See Section 23 of Text) 
Required 
Contract Federal Contributed Total 
Contract 42A continuation (Bank protection, 
miles 88.8-143.3, Sacramento River, 
Sacramento, Colusa, Sutter and 
Yolo Counties) $1,080,000 $212,470 $1,292,470 
Emergency Repairs, County Road 29 
initiation and completion (Sacramento 
River Bank Protection Project, 
emergency bank protection Sacramento 
River, Glenn County river miles 186-188). 678,591 107,208 785,799 
TABLE 35-P FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, 
AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) 
(See Section 27 of Text) 
Fiscal Year 
Study Stage Cost 
(Federal) 
Burney Creek, Shasta County, CA Reconnaissance $ 66,749 
Churn Creek, Shasta County, CA Reconnaissance 63,585 
Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO 1 Plans and Specifications 373,358 
Magpie and Don Julio Creeks, CA Feasibility 42,446 
Battle Mountain, NV Reconnaissance 17,264 
White River at Rangely, CO Reconnaissance 70.000 
$633,402 
1. See Improvement No. 8 for construction 
information. 
35-45

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 35-Q SURVEYS 
(See Section 30 of Text) 
Fiscal year costs were as follows: 
Flood Damage Prevention Studies 
Required Cost Contributions 
Non-Federal Contributions (not required) 
Sacramento-San Joaquin Rivers Special Study 
Special Investigations 
Review of FERC Licenses 
Interagency Water Resources Development 
National Estuary Program 
American Waterfowl Management Plan 
Coordination with Other Water Resource Agencies 
Planning Assistance to States 
(Colorado - $0) 
(California - $19,236) 
National Marine Fisheries Service 
$3,669,428 
752,910
0 
53,618 
92,000 
30,120 
39,000
0 
-2,835 
20,900 
19,116 
TotaTlo tal$$ 44,6,6828,204,09749 
35-46 
I ; c 
__

PROJECTS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED UNDER THE 
FORMER CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION 
The California Debris Commission, consisting of 
three Corps officers appointed by the President with 
the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 
1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San 
Francisco, CA, on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction 
and duties extending over drainage area of 
Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great 
central valley of California and extending from crest 
of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast 
Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit 
River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on 
the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay 
ultimately discharging into the Pacific Ocean through 
connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. 
Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of 
hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and 
San Joaquin Rivers, CA, so that debris will not be 
carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause 
damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of 
water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and 
power development purposes; and direction of 
improvements for control of floods on Sacramento 
River. On November 19, 1986, the Commission was 
abolished by the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (PL 99-662) and all authorities, powers, 
functions, and duties were transferred to the 
Secretary of the Army. All acquired lands and other 
interests presently under jurisdiction of the 
Commission were authorized to be retained and 
administered under direction of the Secretary. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. Regulation of hydraulic mining and 
preparation of plans ................ 35-1A 
2. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA 
(debris control) ................... 35-2A 
3. Treatment of Yuba River debris 
situation-restraining barriers, CA ...... 35-2A 
Flood Control 
4. Sacramento River, CA ............... 35-3A 
Tables 
Table 35-AA Cost and Financial 
Table 35-BB 
Table 35-CC 
Page 
Statement ............... 35-6A 
Authorizing 
Legislation ...... . ....... 35-8A 
Sacramento River, CA: Total 
Cost of Existing Project. . . . 35-9A 
Navigation 
1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC 
MINING AND PREPARATION 
OF PLANS 
Location. Operations largely limited to territory 
between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite 
Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra 
Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 
25 in number.) 
Existing project. Provided for regulating 
hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement 
of conditions upon Sacramento and San Joaquin 
Rivers and their tributaries affected by such 
operations, and preparation of plans to enable 
hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage 
areas. In addition, the Secretary of the Army is 
authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage 
for water and use of outlet facilities- from 
debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation 
purposes and power development upon such 
conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may 
approve. Applications of prospective miners were 
fully investigated by the former California Debris 
Commission and permits to operate were issued to 
those who provide satisfactory debris-restraining 
basins by construction of suitable dams where 
necessary or agree to make payment for storage in 
Government-constructed debris-restraining reservoirs 
constructed under act of June 19, 1934, as set 
forth below. For location and description of 
Government-constructed, debris-restraining reservoirs 
for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 
2. 
Local cooperation. Mineowners bore all expenses 
incurred in complying with orders of the former 
Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of 
debris. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Minor administrative duties were accomplished. 
35-1A

. uIORT OF 1 IH SECRI'T.'ARY OF THiE ARMY ON CIVIL W\ORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 
3, and 4. hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. 
Historical summary. The former Commission 
received 1.292 applications for hydraulic mining 
licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage 
behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, 
in general, continuation of above or similar 
operations. 
2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND 
TRIBUTARIES, CA (DEBRIS 
CONTROL) 
Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed 
in watersheds of Yuba. Bear. and American Rivers, 
CA (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, 
seven in number.) 
Existing project. For description of completed 
North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and 
authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial 
recreation facilities were provided in FY 1959. 
Recreation areas at Harry L. Englebright Dam are 
maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North 
Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by 
Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but 
have been turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation 
(known as the Water and Power Resources Service 
between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) on a 
permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for 
construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, 
including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for 
basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and 
North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle 
Fork of American River and on Bear River have been 
deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 
90-day Congressional project review period, required 
by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended 
August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of 
that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that 
portion is $1,820,000 (1935). 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam 
by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District 
under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the 
Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an 
estimated cost of $46,000 since September 1953. On 
March 1, 1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dam 
were turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation on a 
5-year renewable basis. Permit No. 
DACW05-4-79-527 was renewed for 5 years on 
March 1. 1984, March 1, 1989, and on March 1, 
1994. Bureau will operate and maintain such use until 
Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will 
be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the 
recreation resource is being done by State of 
California by contract with the Bureau. 
Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. 
W-1105-eng-2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., 
(PG&E) (a 1941 contract which expired July 31. 
1991) payment was made to Federal Government of 
$ 18,000 per year for first 30 years and $48,000 per 
year for the next 20 years in return for use of head at 
Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric 
power. Total payment through September 30, 1995, 
amounts to S1,614,393; these funds are now paid to 
the Secretary of the Army and deposited for return to 
the Treasury. PG&E has obtained a new license, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission License No. 
1403-004, issued February 11, 1993, for continued 
operation of Narrows No. 1 Hydroelectric Project and 
has entered into a new storage agreement and an 
operation agreement with the Federal Government 
(Corps). Total payment of $66,070 was received in 
FY 1994, but only $48,000 was reallocated to the 
District. In FY 1995, $18,070 was reallocated to the 
District. Payments under new agreement are 
effective as of Fiscal Year 1993 and will be 8.2 
percent of previous fiscal year's total costs for 
operation and maintenance. License No. 2246, 
effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows 
powerplant was put in operation) was issued by 
Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 
1978) to Yuba County Water Agency for hydroelectric 
power development of Yuba River by the 
company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under 
provisions of Contract No. DA-04-167-CIVENG-
66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, 
payment is to be made to the Federal Government of 
$100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First 
payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1, 
1971; total payment through September 30, 1995, 
amounts to $2,437,151. These funds are paid to 
Sacramento District and deposited for return to the 
Treasury. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: Maintenance: Maintenance and operation 
activities continued at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a 
cost of $877,007, including recreation facilities. Dam 
safety assurance studies at Englebright Dam have 
been completed. 
Historical summary. Construction of dams was 
initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed 
and in use at end of FY 1939, and Harry L. 
Englebright project was completed in January 1941. 
The two debris-control structures are in good 
condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation 
areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. Dam safety 
assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam in 
FY 1981 and were completed in FY 1987. 
3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER 
DEBRIS SITUATION-RESTRAINING 
BARRIERS, CA 
Location. Works are on Yuba River between 
Marysville and where the river emerges from the 
foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly 
from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. 
35-2A

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT 
(See Geological Survey Topographic map of 
Sacramento Valley, CA) 
Existing project. For description of completed 
project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 
1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which 
$361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required 
contributed funds by State of California. (For details 
of project in its original form, see Annual Report, 
1917, p. 1810.) In February 1963, center section of 
dam failed and major rehabilitation of structure was 
completed in December 1964. Total cost for required 
rehabilitation was $1,660,000, of which $830,000 
was Federal cost and $830,000 required contribution 
by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. 
During the December 24, 1964, floodflows on the 
Yuba River, the rehabilitated Daguerre Point Dam 
sustained considerable damage. (See 1965 Annual 
Report, p. 1647 "Operations and results during fiscal 
year.") The reconstructed portion of the dam completed 
earlier in December 1964 was undamaged by 
the flood. Permanent repair of Daguerre Point Dam 
abutment and fish facilities was completed in October 
1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal and required 
State contributed funds on a matching basis. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new 
work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to 
local interests for new work was $361,777 (required 
contribution by State of California). In addition, 
training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre 
Point for 11,250 feet and just above Daguerre Point, 
on the south bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two 
gold-dredging companies in connection with their 
dredging operations. To build these training walls 
would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 
estimate). Flood channels were also built by 
gold-dredging companies within confines of project 
works. Cost to the United States of equally effective 
works to restrain debris movement would have been 
more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to 
local interests for initial and permanent major 
rehabilitation works were $830,000 and $223,904, 
respectively, (required contribution by State of 
California). State of California must contribute 
annually an amount equal to the Federal allotment 
for maintenance. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance: Operations consisted of condition and 
operation studies by hired labor on Yuba River. 
Historical summary. Construction of project 
works was initiated in November 1902. Construction 
of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; 
diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; 
training walls and dikes were completed in 1935. 
About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in 
lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and 
downstream end of training walls. About 20 million 
cubic feet, are confined in river channel by Daguerre 
Point Dam. Additional millions of yards of loose 
material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project 
training walls in upper 7-mile reach of project. Initial 
rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 
1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for 
permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in 
July and completed in October 1965. 
Flood Control 
4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA 
Location. Works covered by this improvement are 
on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central 
California from Collinsville to Ordbend, a distance of 
184 miles. 
Previous project. For details see page 1815 of 
Annual Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report 
for 1938, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. 
Existing project. Sacramento River flood control 
project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for 
Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal 
tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento 
River from Ordbend in Glenn County, CA, 184 miles 
downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end 
of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, 
overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood 
bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus 
floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. 
About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average 
height of 15 feet and 98 miles of bank protection 
are involved in project-.:For further details, see Annual 
Report for 1962, page 2115. (See table 35-BB 
for authorizing legislation.) 
Estimated (October 1987) cost for original project 
(exclusive of supplemental levee improvements), 
including new work and maintenance, is 
$163,925,000 of which $68,925,000 is Federal cost 
and $95 million non-Federal ($90,050,562 for lands 
and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 
required contributed funds for levee construction, 
bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this 
amount, $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 
for maintenance. Estimated October 1995 total 
project cost is $176,903,000, of which $79,855,000 is 
Federal and $97,048,000 is non-Federal. Total 
estimate now includes remedial levee work for Yolo 
Bypass and Cache Slough (Unit 109); Mid-Valley 
Area; Lower Sacramento Area; and Upper Sacramento 
Area (engineering and design only), but 
excludes Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction 
and Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction. 
Colusa Basin Drain and Knights Landing 
(West Levee) are not incrementally economically 
feasible, but these sites have been transferred to 
Upper Sacramento Area. Knights Landing (East 
Levee) has been included with Mid-Valley Area. In 
addition to project requirements, local interests 
constructed several pumping plants for drainage of 
agricultural and urban land protected by project 
levees. Some channel clearing work was 
accomplished by State of California and other local 
interests to supplement project levee construction. 
35-3A

REPORT OF T'1E SI:CRI::'ARY OF THIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of 
Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered 
deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. 
Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is 
S2,560.000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of 
$3,080,000 plus U.S. costs. for construction. 
Operation and maintenance of completed project will 
be responsibility of local interests; as units of project 
are completed, they are transferred to agencies of 
State of California for operation and maintenance. 
Existing project was adopted by 1917 Flood Control 
Act (H. Doc 81, 62d Cong., 1st sess., as modified by 
Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 
1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th 
Cong.. 1st sess.). River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. 
Committee print 75th Cong., 1st sess.). and 1941 
Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., 1st 
sess.). 
Phase I - Sacramento River Flood Control System 
Evaluation recommended reconstruction of 32 miles 
of Sacramento area levees. Report was approved and 
in March 1989, Sacramento Urban Area Levee 
Reconstruction project was established under authority 
of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. New 
project is located within boundaries of Sacramento 
River Flood Control System in highly urbanized area 
around city of Sacramento, near confluence of 
Sacramento and American Rivers. It includes 
Natomas area levees from Natomas Cross Canal 
Bypass through Reclamation District 900 and portions 
of the Yolo Bypass east levee in West Sacramento; 
and, in South Sacramento, the east bank of 
Sacramento River from Miller Park to town of 
Freeport. Estimated (October 1995) cost for 
Sacramento Urban project is $43,000,000 of which 
$27,835,000 is Federal and $15,165,000 is 
non-Federal (including a cash contribution of 
$3,530,000). 
Sacramento River Flood Control Project 
(Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District) (G.C.I.D.) is part 
of the fishery/irrigation enhancement project being 
developed by G.C.I.D. Project is located between 
River Mile 202 and 206 on Sacramento River near 
the Glenn-Tehama county line. The Corps riffle 
restoration project includes multiple sheet piles 
coupled with stone to replicate natural riffle and bank 
protection to restore river hydraulic gradient to 
pre-1970 conditions. This will stabilize river 
hydraulics. Estimated (October 1995) project cost is 
$14,200,000, of which $10,650,000 is Federal and 
$3,550.000 is non-Federal. Project was established 
under authority of the 1917 Sacramento River Flood 
Control Project (see Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act of 1990). 
Phase II - Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee 
Reconstruction. Project is located within boundaries 
of the Sacramento River Flood Control System in 
Butte, Sutter and Yuba counties in north-central 
California. Area includes Feather and Yuba Rivers 
and their tributaries. Sutter Bypass, cities of 
Marysville and Yuba City and communities of Linda 
and Olivehurst. An evaluation of about 134 miles of 
Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in 
Marysville/Yuba City area identified about 22 miles of 
levees as being structurally unstable. Project consists 
of reconstructing those levees by installing about 17 
miles of toe drains, installing about 4 miles of slurry 
cut-off walls and backfilling about 1 mile of a 
drainage ditch to rectify structural stability; also 
consists of raising about 10 miles of levees to restore 
design freeboard and developing about 76 acres for 
fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated October 1995 
project cost is $31,400,000, of which $23,600,000 is 
Federal and $7,800,000 is non-Federal (including a 
cash contribution of $1,760,000). Project was 
established under authority of Sacramento River 
Flood Control Project. 
Local cooperation. Local interests have fully 
complied with requirements for all work completed 
and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements 
for remaining work. Local interest costs from required 
contributed funds for project work total 
$4,949,438 for levee construction, bank protection 
works, and levee setbacks, of which $4,939,752 was 
for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. New 
work: (a) Sacramento Urban Area Levee 
Reconstruction: Construction is complete, however, 
final payment and contract close-out activities 
remain. (b) Sacramento River Flood Control Project 
(Glenn Colusa Irrigation District (G.C.I.D.): 
Engineering was continued on riffle restoration on 
Sacramento River including building of multiple sheet 
piles coupled with stone to replicate natural riffle and 
bank protection to restore river hydraulic gradient to 
pre-1970 conditions. (c) Marysville/Yuba City Area 
Levee Reconstruction: Engineering continued. 
Historical summary. Construction of existing 
project began in FY 1918 and is about 99 percent 
complete. Channel improvement to date has 
produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic 
feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache 
Slough. In addition, discharges up to 21,000 cubic 
feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento 
River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major 
project items include about 977 miles of levees; five 
weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 
cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of 
outfall gates; channel improvement and clearing in 
Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and 
Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main 
bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses at 
Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth 
Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and 
of Cache Creek settling basin; installation of gaging 
stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below 
Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between 
Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 
and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was 
completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale 
and Moulton weirs in 1932. and Colusa weir in 1933. 
35-4A

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT 
Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 
1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping 
plants on Sutter Bypass were completed in 1944. 
Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, 
rectification of channels, and bank protection on 
Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County 
and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by 1941 
Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 
1947, 1948, 1949, and 1951. Yolo Bypass and Cache 
Slouth (Unit 109) was completed in 1990. Work 
remaining comprises completion of levee stage 
construction-Marysville/Yuba City Area levees; 
Mid-Valley Area; Lower Sacramento Area; and 
Upper Sacramento Area. (See Table 35-CC for total 
cost of existing project to September 30, 1995.) 
35-5A

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 35-AA COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
1. Regulation of 
Hydraulic Mining 
and Preparation 
of Plans 
2. Sacramento River 
and Tributaries, 
CA (Debris 
Control) 
(Contributed 
Funds, Other) 
3. Treatment of 
Yuba River 
Debris Situation 
Restraining 
Barriers, CA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Required 
Contributed 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds, Other) 
4. Sacramento 
River, CA 
including 
Sacramento River 
Flood Control 
Project (Federal 
Funds) 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
Sacramento 
Urban Area Levee 
Reconstruction 
(Federal Funds) 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
$821,325 
821,325 
700,000 
725,921 
11,010 
2,000 
18,634 
12,000 
8,790 
830,000 
805,736 
299,990 
23,040 
7,000 
9,407 
- - 5,093,999 1 2 
- - 5,093,999 1 2 
1,064,800 952,741 13,936,474 3 
1,056,959 877,077 13,809,724 4 
280,317 - 
-1,000 
1,145 
27,500 
11,722 
2,000 
323,420 s 
315,7776 
361,482 
361,482 
29000 1,848,0317 
22,524 1,838,148 
1,053,904 
1,053,904 
361,777 
361,777 
1,841,338 
1,795,175 
1,053,904 
1,053,904 
36,000 8 
34,000 8 
1,221,000 484,000 567,000 3,700,000 80,442,835s 14 
1,515,322 398,056 631,372 1,329,635 78,043,516a 14 
- - - - 1,979,104 
- - - - 1,979,104 
- - - - 10,724,085 o10 
- - - - 10,724,085 o10 
- - - - 9,68611 
- - - - 9,68611 
3,371,000 5,406,000 -600,000 3,663,000 24,006,300 
8,823,196 6,203,394 842,439 3,760,711 27,113,212 
35-6A

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 35-AA (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost to 
in Text Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
(Required New Work 
Contributed Contrib. 514,900 134,800 - 247,327 2,287,327 
Funds) Cost 634,064 739,445 197,338 115,402 2,135,990 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds, Other) Contrib. 2,196,712 270,928 - 200,000 5,792,64012 
Cost 2,227,152 2,309,364 -10,217 -38,548 5,427,767 12 
Sacramento New Work 
River Flood Approp. 300,000 500,000 400,000 400,000 2,193,000 13 
Control Cost 662,724 578,432 209,066 241,207 2,129,064 13 
(G.C.I.D.), 
CA (Federal 
Funds) 
Sacramento New Work 
River Flood Approp. - 538,000 689,000 1,479,000 2,706,000 14 
Control Cost - 535,842 656,774 525,117 1,717,733 14 
(Marysville/Yuba 
City Area levees), 
CA (Federal Funds 
1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost 
on inactive portion of project. 
2. Includes $477,127 for recreational facilities at 
North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright 
($414,654), Code 710 appropriations and costs. 
3. Includes $12,319,651 from regular funds and 
$1,616,823 from Hydraulic Mining in California funds. 
4. Includes $12,297,643 from regular costs and 
$1,512,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California costs. 
5. Includes $12,420 contributed funds, other, 
from State of California Department of Navigation and 
Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float; 
and $311,000 funds from State of California 
Department of Boating and Waterways for refurbishing 
restrooms and launching facilities at Englebright Dam. 
6. Includes $12,420 costs for acquisition of 
boarding float and $280,317 costs for refurbishing 
restrooms and launching facilities at Englebright Dam. 
7. Includes deferred maintenance funds in 
amount of $207,500. 
8. Miscellaneous engineering and construction 
accomplished at expense of local interests in 
connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam 
necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. 
9. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 
for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 
public works funds for new work for existing project. 
10. Includes $680,000 required contribution for 
previous project; $4,939,752 required contributed 
funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary 
contribution for bank protection for existing project. 
11. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for 
existing project. 
12. Includes contributed funds, other, from the 
State of California for relocation of utilities, irrigation 
ditch, access ramps, and miscellaneous small structures 
in the Natomas, Greenhaven Pocket and West 
Sacramento areas. (Sacramento Urban Area). 
13. G.C.I.D. construction funds received in FY 
1991, but no costs were incurred. Includes $493,000 
total funds and costs under General Investigations for 
Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 
14. Not reflected in actual annual accounting 
records for Marysville/Yuba City are $1,710,000 costs 
for FY 91 and FY 92 incurred under Sacramento River 
Flood Control Project for design effort. These costs are 
considered part of Marysville/Yuba City cost-shared 
project. 
35-7A

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 35-BB AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
1. 
Ex. Doc. 267, 51st 
Cong., 2d sess., Ex. 
Doc. 98, 47th Cong., 
1st sess. 1 
(Amendment of sec. 13, 
Act of Mar. 1, 1893.)1 
Mar. 1, 1893 
Feb. 27, 1907 
35-8A 
REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING 
AND PREPARATION OF PLANS 
Created California Debris Commission and 
authorized: (a) Hydraulic mining under its 
regulation in drainage areas of Sacramento 
and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without 
injury to navigability of these river systems or 
to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation 
of plans by Commission for improvement 
of navigability of these river systems, and 
flood and debris-control therein. 
Authorized California Debris Commission to 
permit hydraulic mining without construction 
of impounding works, provided there is no 
injury to navigability of above river systems 
or lands adjacent thereto. 
Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides 
for construction of debris dams or other restraining 
works by California Debris Commission 
and collection of a 3-percent tax on 
gross proceeds of each mine using such 
facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and 
substitute an annual tax per cubic yard 
mined, obtained by dividing total capital 
cost of each dam, reservoir, and rightsof-
way, by total capacity of reservoir for 
restraint of debris; and authorized revocation 
of Commission orders permitting 
such mining, for failure to pay this annual 
tax within 30 days after its due date; and 
also authorized receipt of money advances, 
from mineowners to aid such construction, 
to be refunded later from annual payments 
of yardage taxes on material mined. 
Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision 
that the Secretary of the Army is 
authorized to enter into contracts to supply 
storage for water and use of outlet facilities 
from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic 
and irrigation purposes and power development, 
upon such conditions of delivery, use, 
and payment as he may approve, these payments 
are to be deposited to credit of such 
reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to 
be repaid by tax on mining operations. 
Abolished the California Debris Commission 
and transferred all authorities, powers, 
functions, and duties to the Secretary of 
the Army. Authorized all acquired land 
and other interests presently under jurisdiction 
of the Commission to be retained 
and administered under direction of the 
Secretary. 
Sec. 1001, 1986 WRDA 
June 19, 1934 
June 25, 1938 
Nov. 17, 1986

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT 
TABLE 35-BB (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date of 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA 
Dec. 22, 1944 Additional levee construction and reconstruction, H. Doc. 649, 78th 
and May 17, 1950 including levee protection of Upper Butte Basin, Cong., 2d sess., and 
and multipurpose reservoirs. 2 367, 81st Cong., 
1st sess. 
July 3, 1958 Bank protection and incidental channel improve- H. Doc. 272, 84th 
ments, Sacramento River from Chico Landing Cong., 2d sess. 
to Red Bluff, and local interests flood plain 
zoning above Chico Landing. 2 
July 14, 1960 Bank protection works at critical locations, S. Doc. 103, 86th 
Sacramento River. 2 Cong., 2d sess. 
1. For latest published map, see Annual Report 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail 
for 1913, p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 23. 
Document 50, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 
TABLE 35-CC SACRAMENTO RIVER CA: TOTAL COST OF 
EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
(See Section 4 of Text) 
Funds New Work Maintenance Total 
Regular $75,877,047 $1,979,104 $77,856,151 1 
Public Works 1,486,469 -- 1,486,469 
Total U.S. 77,363,516 1,979,104 79,342,620 
Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 
Contributed, Other 5,104,333 -- 5,104,333 
Total All Funds 87,407,601 1,988,790 89,396,391 2 
1. Includes $429,671 representing book value of 
plant purchased with previous project funds and 
transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 
2. Excludes financial information for Sacramento 
Urban Area Levee Reconstruction, Glenn-Colusa 
Irrigation District (G.C.I.D.) and Marysville/Yuba City 
Area Levee Reconstruction projects, all authorized 
under the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. 
(See Table 35-AA). 
35-9A

PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION 
The Pacific Ocean Division is an operating division with 
both district and division functions. Its civil works responsibilities 
encompass the State of Hawaii, the Territory 
of Guam, the Territory of American Samoa, and the 
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The 
division is unique in that its area of responsibility is 
totally comprised of islands dispersed over an ocean 
environment exceeding 6 million square miles. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation 
1. Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, 
Hawaii, Hawaii ....................... 
2. Maalaea Harbor, Maui, Hawaii ........... 
3. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .... 
4. Navigation Work Under Special 
Authorization ........................ 
Erosion Control 
5. Beach Erosion Work Under Special 
Authorization ....................... 
Flood Control 
6. Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii .......... 
7. Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii .......... 
8. Flood Control Work Under Special 
Authorization ........................ 
General Investigations 
9. Surveys ............................ 
Page General Investigations (Contd) 
10. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 
36-1 11. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ... 
36-2 
36-2 Tables 
Table 36-A 
36-2 Table 36-B 
Table 36-C 
Table 36-D 
Table 36-E 
Table 36-F 
36-2 
36-2 
36-3 
Table 36-G 
36-3 Table 36-H 
36-3 
Page 
36-3 
36-4 
Cost and Financial Statement .... 36-5 
Authorizing Legislation .......... 36-6 
Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects ...................... 36-7 
Other Authorized Beach 
Erosion Control Projects ......... 36-8 
Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects ................ 36-9 
Other Authorized Multiple Purpose 
Projects, Including Power ........ 36-9 
Deauthorized Projects ........... 36-10 
Emergency Streambank and 
Shoreline Protection Activities 
Pursuant to Section 14 .......... 36-11 
Navigation 
1. KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, 
HAWAII, HAWAII 
Location. Kawaihae Harbor is located on the west 
coast of the island of Hawaii, approximately 85 nautical 
miles northeast of Hilo, County of Hawaii. (See NOAA 
Chart 19320) 
Existing project. For a description of the existing 
project, see page 36-2 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See 
Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) 
Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement 
(PCA) was executed on August 17, 1995. The local 
sponsor has agreed to: a. request betterments in writing, 
describe the betterments requested to be accomplished, 
and be solely responsible for all costs due to the requested 
betterments; b. provide all lands, easements, rights-ofway, 
and suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material 
disposal areas that the Government determines the 
local sponsor must provide for the construction, opera- 
36-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
tion, and maintenance of the general navigation features, 
and shall perform or ensure performance of all relocations 
that the Government determines to be necessary for the 
construction, operation, and maintenance of the general 
navigation features; c. contribute a share of the total cost 
of construction of the general navigation features as 
follows: 10 percent of that portion of the total cost of 
construction of the general navigation features assigned 
to dredging to a depth not in excess of 20 feet and any overdepth 
dredging associated therewith; plus 25 percent of 
that portion of the total cost of construction of the general 
navigation features assigned to dredging to a depth in 
excess of 20 feet but not in excess of 45 feet and over-depth 
dredging associated therewith; d. provide a cash contribution 
in the amount necessary to meet its required 
share; e. pay an amount equal to the 10 percent amount, 
with interest, reduced by the credit for lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, relocations and suitable borrow and dredged 
or excavated material disposal areas provided before the 
end of the period of construction over a period not to 
exceed 30 years; f. construct the local service facilities and 
shall be responsible for taking all actions to enable such 
construction at no cost to the Government; g. operate and 
maintain the local service facilities at no cost to the 
Government; and h. not use Federal funds to meet its 
obligations for the Project unless the Federal granting 
agency verifies in writing that the expenditure of such 
funds is expressly authorized by statute. 
Terminal facilities. There is an 850-foot long breakwater 
constructed in 1970. 
Operations during fiscal year. Work during the 
Fiscal Year included continuation and finalization of 
plans and specifications, and environmental coordination. 
The Project Cooperation Agreement was executedin 
August 1995. The estimated completion date of construction 
is July 1997. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal 
Year were $209,677. 
2. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII 
Location. Maalaea Bay is situated on the southwest 
coast of Maui, approximately 7 miles south of Wailuku, 
the county seat of Maui. (See NOAA Chart 19350) 
Existing project. For a description of the existing 
project. see page 36-3 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See 
Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) 
Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement 
(PCA) is delayed due to resolution of environmental 
concerns as a result of the Supplemental Environmental 
Impact Statement. The PCA is being coordinated with 
the local sponsor for execution prior to construction. 
Terminal facilities. There is an existing 1,000-foot 
long south breakwater, a 870-foot long east breakwater, 
300-foot long wharf. 90-foot wide entrance channel, and 
a single lane launch ramp, all constructed by the State of 
Hawaii. 
Operations during fiscal year. Work during the 
Fiscal Year included continuation of plans and specifications, 
completion of a Limitied Reevaluation Report, 
continued coordination of environmental issues, and coordination 
with the local sponsor for continued support of 
the project. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year 
were $236,822. The plans and specifications phase was 
approximately 95% complete as of September 30, 1995. 
3. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION 
SURVEYS 
Condition surveys were conducted by the Portland 
District at Barbers Point Deep Draft Harbor, Oahu; 
Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu; Honokohau Small 
Boat Harbor, Oahu; Honolulu Harbor, Oahu; and Waianae 
Small Boat Harbor, Oahu between March and April 1995. 
Total cost to conduct the above surveys was $42,000. 
4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, 
Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). 
Fiscal Year costs were $75,892 for Kahului Small Boat 
Harbor, Maui; $50,000 for Kahului Harbor Modification, 
Maui; $10,000 for Rota Harbor, CNMI; and $30,000 for 
Western District, American Samoa. 
Beach Erosion Control 
5. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Emergency streambank and shoreline protection 
activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 
(Preauthorization). See Table 36-H. 
Beach Erosion control activities pursuant to Section 
103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). 
Fiscal Year costs were $6,178 for Agana Bayfront, 
Guam; $34,198 for Commercial Port Road, Guam; $15,007 
for East Agana Guam; and $36,724 for Micro Beach, 
CNMI. 
Flood Control 
6. ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HAWAII 
Location. The Alenaio watershed is located in the 
South Hilo District on the island of Hawaii. Hilo is the 
principal urban center in the South Hilo district and the 
County seat for the County of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 
81408) 
36-2

PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION 
Existing project. For a description of the existing 
project, see page 36-4 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See 
Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
was executed on April 27, 1992. Requirements are described 
in full on page 36-3 of the FY92 Annual Report. 
Terminal facilities. None 
Operations during fiscal year. Work during the 
Fiscal Year included award of the construction contract in 
November 1994 for $10,237,000 of which $7,506,800 is 
Federal cost and $2,730,200 is non-Federal cost. The 
estimated completion date of construction is in June 1997. 
Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were 
$3,286,358. 
7. KAWAINUI MARSH, OAHU, HAWAII 
Location. Kawainui Marsh is located in Kailua on 
the windward coast of the island of Oahu, Hawaii. It is 
bounded by the Mokapu Saddle Road on the north, Kailua 
Road on the south, and the community of Coconut Grove 
on the east. (See USGS Quadrangle for Mokapu, HI) 
Existing project. The authorized project provides a 
combination of concrete floodwalls on a raised levee. The 
floodwall would vary in height to a maximum of 4 feet 
along the total levee length of about 6,300 feet. A flood 
warning system is an integral part of this plan. The 
existing project is authorized under Section 205 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
(LCA) was executed on October 3, 1993 between the 
Department of the Army and the City and County of 
Honolulu. Requirements are described in full on page 36- 
2 of the FY92 Annual Report. 
Terminal facilities. None. 
Operations during fiscal year. Work during the 
Fiscal Year included initiation of construction. Construction 
was approximately 22% complete as of September 30, 
1995. The estimated completion date of construction is 
March 1997. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year 
were $1,642,695. 
8. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 
Public Law 80-858. (Preauthorization). 
Fiscal Year costs were $79,070 for Kahawainui Stream, 
Oahu; $25,471 for Palai Stream, Hawaii; $47,906 for 
Puna Area, Hawaii; and $43,748 for Waiakea Stream, 
Hawaii. 
Project Modifications for Improvements of Environment 
pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99- 
662, as amended. (Preauthorization) 
Fiscal Year costs were $3,349 for Kaunakakai Stream, 
Molokai, Hawaii; $64,212 for Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, 
Hawaii; and $1,866 for coordination with local agencies. 
Emergency flood control activities pursuant to 
Public Law 84-99. 
Federal cost during the fiscal year for Flood Control and 
Coastal Emergencies appropriation was $442,438 of which 
$308,182 was for disaster preparedness; and $134,256 for 
rehabilitation. 
General Investigations 
9. SURVEYS 
Fiscal year costs were $560,659 of which $138,920 was 
for navigation studies; $193,187 was for flood damage 
prevention studies; $146,460 for miscellaneous activities; 
and $82,092 for coordination with other agencies. In 
addition, $515 in non-Federal funds for coordination with 
other agencies and $114,329 for cost-shared studies. 
10. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 
BASIC DATA 
Flood plain management services. The Flood 
Plain Management Services Program is authorized and 
implemented under Section 206, PL 86-645, 1960 Flood 
Control Act, as amended. Through technical services and 
planning guidance, the programrprovides information on 
floods and flood related information to improve planning 
for the careful use of the nation's flood plains, thereby 
reducing the potential for losses to life and property from 
floods and wave actions. Non-Federal agencies are assisted 
with flood hazard evaluation and planning information 
for flood and coastal hazard areas without charge. 
Beginning November 21, 1991, Federal agencies and 
private entities were also offered these services on a cost 
recovery basis. This assistance is in the form of local flood 
plain regulations, National Flood Insurance requirements, 
and Executive Order 11988 requirements for federal 
agencies. Such assistance may include flood information 
and timing, floodwater velocity, extent of flooding, duration 
of flooding, flood frequency and regulatory floodway 
limits. 
Services accomplished during fiscal year. 
Requests and responses for technical services and planning 
assistance totaled 3,203, which included services to 
Federal agencies, state and local government agencies, 
individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, 
engineers, architects and other private parties. Costs for 
providing these services during the fiscal year were 
$266,052. 
Hydrologic Studies. Storm studies cost was $20,913. 
Total costs for collection and study of basic data during 
36-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
the fiscal year were $286,985. 
11. PRECONSTRUCTION 
ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
Kaumalapau Harbor, Lanai, HI- As directed by the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 
1993, preconstruction engineering and design studies 
were initiated in Fiscal Year 1993. The Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act of 1994 also directed the 
continuation of preconstruction engineering and design 
in Fiscal Year 1994. Work during the Fiscal Year consisted 
of continuation of a Special Report and Technical 
Appendices, and completion of physical and numerical 
modeling studies by the Coastal Engineering Research 
Center; selection of a preferred plan; and continuation of 
environmental documentation. Total costs incurred during 
the Fiscal Year were $383,851. 
Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI - The 
project was authorized by Section 101 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1968 (PL 90-483). A General Design 
Memorandum (GDM) and Final Environmental Impact 
Statement were completed in September 1980 and approved 
by the Director of Civil Works in September 1981. 
Work during the Fiscal Year consisted of compilation and 
analysis of a boater survey, completion of detailed economic 
analysis and initiation of an Environmental Assessment. 
Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year 
were $144,749. 
:36-4

PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION 
TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total Cost To 
In Text Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 Sept. 30, 1995 
1. Kawaihae Small New Work: 
Boat Harbor, Approp. 130,000 160,000 3,560,000 -578,000 3,940,200 
Hawaii, HI Cost 153,136 151,330 188,585 209,677 1,347,787 
(Federal Funds) 
2. Maalaea Harbor New Work: 
Maui, HI Approp. 119,000 235,000 3,575,000 -2,812,000 1,850,000 
(Federal Funds) Cost 233,505 196,273 260,194 236,822 1,525,081 
6. Alenaio Stream, New Work: 
Hawaii, HI Approp. 256,000 220,000 2,995,000 2,829,000 7,319,000 
(Federal Funds) Cost 344,714 194,946 223,821 3,286,398 4,955,193 
(Contributed Contrib. 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 
Funds) Cost 0 0 0 347 347 
7. Kawainui Marsh, New Work: 
Oahu, HI Approp. 0 191,000 74,000 2,039,000 2,629,000 
(Federal Funds) Cost 393 187,692 67,308 1,612,695 2,192,694 
(Contributed Contrib. 0 0. 0 585,000 835,000 
Funds) Cost 17,951 9 0 140,886 390,886 
36-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Oct. 27, 1965 
Aug. 3, 1968 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 28, 1990 
KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII 
An 850-foot long, 120-foot wide, and 12-foot deep 
entrance channel; a 1.2 acre and 12-foot deep existing 
turning basin; a 640-foot long, 80-foot wide, and 8-foot 
deep access channel; a 1,225-foot long west protective revetstructure; 
a 1,050-foot long east protective revetted structure 
a 400-foot long wave absorber; and a 2.5 acre, 650-foot long 
revetted offshore island. 
MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII 
A 620-foot long extension of the south breakwater, 
a new 610-foot length, 150 to 180-foot width, 12 to 
15-foot depth entrance channel, a 1.7 acre and 12-foot 
depth turning basin and a 720-foot length, 80-foot 
width and an 8-foot deep access channel. 
ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HAWAII 
Project consists of approximately 1,640-feet of 
concrete-lined channel; floodproofing five individual 
structures, relocation of one public and six residential 
structures and incorporating floodplain management 
regulations for undeveloped areas. 
Modified by the General Design Memorandum and 
Environmental Assessment dated March 1990, at a 
total cost of $12,060,000, with an estimated first Federal 
cost of $7,730,000 and an estimated first non-Federal 
cost of $4,330,000. 
Sec 301, PL 89-298 
Cong., 1st sess. 
Sec 101, PL 90-438 
Cong., 2nd sess. 
Sec 401, PL 99-662 
Sec 102, PL 101-640 
36-6 
2. 
6.

PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION 
TABLE 36-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operations and 
Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance 
Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam Completed 1978 $ 937,798 $ 52,555 
Agat Harbor, Guam Completed 1989 2,000,0002 --- 
Auasi Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,033,015 ; 76,197 
Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,783,1291 1,088,531 
Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1990 53,519,193 ' 623,115 
Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1978 527,047" 208,902 
Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1991 5,512,440 4,091,308 
Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1971 781,036' 63,693 
Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 16,044,095 " 3,426,214 
Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1976 751,867" --- 
Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1984 7,203,221 'o 7,287,654 
Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1968 157,997" 3,127 
Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Inactive 1990 171,400 --- 
Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1981 5,983,501" 61,800 
Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1956 3,348,000 2 41,857 
Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Active 1981 193,000 --- 
Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1990 3,623,450 " 
Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii Completed 1986 372,000 ' 495,256 
Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1987 2,127,724 '' 10,116,779 
Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1976 584,513'" 30,707 
Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1976 980,018 '' 5,054,285 
Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1979 432,523" --- 
Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1984 752,645 '8 2,794,411 
Rota Harbor, CNMI Completed 1985 2,000,000'" 436,200 
Saipan Small Boat Harbor, CNMI Deferred 1982 194,000--- 
Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1985 1,991,569 2" 546,600 
Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1979 1,940,011 21 92,900 
Welles Harbor, Midway Island Completed 1950 2,448,056 22 2,111 
'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed 
Funds of $282,474 for Construction. 
"In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,239,364 for Construction. 
;Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed 
Funds of $86,563 for Construction. 
4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed 
Funds of $231,437 for Construction. 
51n addition, Contributed Funds of $2,402,909 for Construction. 
"Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed 
Funds of $410,077 for Construction and $84,388 for Operation and 
Maintenance. 
'In addition, Contributed Funds of $630,568 for Construction. 
8In addition, Contributed Funds of $201,282 for Construction. 
"Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 
�In addition, Contributed Funds of $30,200 for Construction. 
"In addition, Contributed Funds of $62,102 for Construction. 
'"Abandonment authorized by R & H Act of 1965 (HD 98, 89th 
Congress, 1st Session). 
l';Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed 
Funds of $364,757 for Construction. 
41n addition, Contributed Funds of $370,845 for Construction. 
'5 1In addition, Contributed Funds of $223,261 for Construction. 
'"Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 
1974. In addition, Contributed Funds of $405,471 for Construction.
'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed 
Funds of $61,953 for Construction. 
'8In addition, Contributed Funds of $200,000 for Construction. 
"Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed 
Funds of $774,373 for Construction. 
20Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed 
Funds of $54,034 for Construction. 
211In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,791,068 for Construction. 
-"Completed in 1941 and Maintenance transferred to Department 
of Navy. 
36-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 36-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report 
See Annual 
Project Status Report for: 
Cost to September 30, 1995 
Construction 
Operations and 
Maintenance 
Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa 
Asquiroga Bay, Guam 
Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii 
Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii 
Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii 
Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii 
Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii 
Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii 
Lepua Area, American Samoa 
Masefau Bay, American Samoa 
Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa 
Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa 
Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa 
Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa 
Poloa Area, American Samoa 
Saipan Beach Road, CNMI 
Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii 
Sand Island Shore Protection, Oahu, Hawaii 
Vatia Area, American Samoa 
Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Terminated 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Deferred 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Deferred 
1978 
1986 
1967 
1976 
1977 
1981 
1972 
1982 
1992 
1992 
1984 
1987 
1984 
1978 
1978 
1992 
1981 
1992 
1978 
1979 
$ 254,015' 
227,181 2 
240,148 : 
176,488 
158,916 " 
999,996" 
154,313 
355,472 K 
1,706,225 
500,000 2 
225,0002 
189,500 
174,941 2 
394,187 "' 
136,040 " 
176,000 2 
301,879 12 
1,313,400 i: 
154,309 '1 
729,087 '. 
'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. $209,549 in 
Contributed Funds. 
2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 
'In addition. $160,098 in Contributed Funds. 
'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. $97,075 in 
('ontributed Funds. 
Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $56,916 in 
('ontributed Funds. 
''Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in 
('ontributed funds. 
Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in 
('ontributed Funds. 
"Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and terminated in April 
1980 as a ('ircuit ('ourt ruled sand mining to be illegal. In addition, 
$177.300 in ('ontributed Funds. 
"Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $485,371 in 
Constibuted Funds. 
"'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $312,480 in 
Contributed Funds. 
"Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $101,547 in 
Contributed Funds. 
iAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $255,728 in 
Contributed Funds. 
i';Authorized for construction by Public Law 100-71. In addition, 
$1,226,486 in Contributed Funds. 
i'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $132,075 in 
Contributed Funds 
'5In addition $82,000 in Advanced Funds and $17,640 in Contributed 
Funds. 
36-8 
183,000 
--- 
--- 
--- 
--- 
--- 
--- 
--- 
--- 
--- 
--- 
--- 
--- 
--- 
--- 
--- 
--- 
183,000

PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION 
TABLE 36-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operations and 
Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance 
Agana River, Guam Inactive 1989 $ 250,000 $ --- 
Asan Village, Guam Completed 1986 1,275,500 --- 
Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1967 784,867' --- 
lao Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1985 12,285,000 115,495 
Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1990 3,910,000 --- 
Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1990 10,723,172 --- 
Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 25,552,400 - 
Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1950 73,478 " --- 
Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 1,265,567 --- 
Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1971 1,000,000 --- 
Namo River, Guam Completed 1982 2,416,314 " --- 
Paauau Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1985 1,978,514 --- 
Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1966 1,044,888 --- 
'In addition, $11,953 in Contributed Funds. 4Includes Non-Federal reimbursement of recreation construction 
"Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $459,001 in cost of $5,668,300. In addition, $8,175 in Contributed Funds. 
Contributed Funds. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 
:In addition, $518,272 in Contributed Funds. "Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $540,335 in 
Contributed Funds. 
TABLE 36-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE 
PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER 
For Last Cost to September 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Operations and 
Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance 
Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, 
Federated States of Micronesia 
Completed 1994 $ 8,000,000 
36-9 
~" --

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 36-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Date Federal Contributed 
See Annual and Funds Funds 
Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended 
Ala Wai Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 November 1986 $ 40,117 
PL 99-662 
Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 1967 November 1977 --- 
HD #94-413 
Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii 1967 November 1981--- 
HD #97-59 
Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii 1965 November 1986--- 
PL 99-662 
Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1972 January 1990 1,481 
PL 99-662 
Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1967 January 1990--- 
PL 99-662 
Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, Hawaii 1975 July 1981 86,235 
Director of 
Civil Works 
Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, 1979 July 1981 221,500 
Molokai, Hawaii Director of 
Civil Works 
Kaunakakai Deep Draft Harbor, 1966 January 1990 133,188 292,441 
Molokai, Hawaii PL 99-662 
Kaunakakai Small Draft Harbor, --- January 1990--- 
Molokai, Hawaii PL 99-662 
Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 September 1975 98,800 
Director of 
Civil Works 
Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 1977 January 1990 186,937 
PL 99-662 
Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, 1972 January 1990 30,378 
Oahu, Hawaii PL 99-662 
Nawiliwili Deep Draft Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii --- January 1990 
PL 99-662 
Rainmaker Hotel. American Samoa --- November 1991 
PL 99-662 
Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii. Hawaii 1967 January 1990 
PL 99-662 
Saipan Harbor, Northern Narianas --- November 1991 
PL 99-662 
36-10

PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION 
TABLE 36-G (Contd) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Date Federal Contributed 
See Annual and Funds Funds 
Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended 
Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam --- August 1981 80,764 
Director of 
Civil Works 
Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii --- November 1986 
PL 99-662 
Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island 1950 November 1986--- 
PL 99-662 
TABLE 36-H EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE 
PROTECTION ACTIVITIES 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, 
PUBLIC LAW 79-526, AS AMENDED 
(PREAUTHORIZATION) 
Study Fiscal Year Costs 
Agat Shoreline, Guam 
Alii Drive, Hawaii, Hawaii 
Garapan Beach Road, CNMI 
Haaula Highway, Oahu, Hawaii 
Inarajan Shoreline, Guam 
Kaaawa Highway, Oahu, Hawaii 
Lauliifou Shoreline Protection, American Samoa 
Launiupoko, Maui, Hawaii 
Power Plant Road, Guam 
Punaluu Highway, Oahu, Hawaii 
South Agat (Route 2) Shoreline, Guam 
Umatac Shoreline, Guam 
TOTAL 
36-11 
$ 10,000 
29,340 
42,693 
58,999 
10,000 
50,999 
2,481 
981 
23,496 
48,915 
39,634 
10,000 
$327,538

PORTLAND, OR DISTRICT *
The territorial limits of the Portland District include 
the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, 
the portions of the States of Oregon and Washington 
which lie within the Columbia River watershed downstream 
of the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and 
south central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the 
Steens Mountains, but not including that part which 
drains into the Klamath Lake and River. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation Page 
1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, 
OR and W A ....................................................... 37-2 
2. Chetco River, OR ............................................... 37-2 
3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below 
Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ..................... 37-2 
4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA..................... 37-4 
5. Columbia River between Chinook, WA and 
Head of Sand Island .......................................... 37-4 
6. Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA ....... 37-4 
7. Columbia River between Vancouver, 
WA and The Dalles, OR .................................. 37-5 
8. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, 
Ham m ond, OR .................................................. 37-5 
9. Columbia River, Vancouver Deep Draft 
Anchorage, W A .................................................. 37-6 
10. Coos Bay, OR ..................................................... 37-6 
11. Coquille River, OR ............................................. 37-7 
12. Depoe Bay, OR ................................................... 37-7 
13. Navigation Work Under Special 
Authorization .................................................... 37-7 
14. Port Orford, OR ................................................. 37-8 
15. Project Condition Surveys .............................. 37-8 
16. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR ............ 37-8 
17. Siuslaw River, OR ............................................. 37-8 
18. Skipanon Channel, OR ...................................... 37-9 
19. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR ............................... 37-9 
20. Umpqua River, OR ............................................. 37-9 
21. Umpqua River, Winchester Bay, OR ................ 37-10 
22. Westport, OR - Puget Island, WA..................... 37-10 
23. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR ....... 37-11 
24. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR .......................... 37-11 
25. Yaquina River, OR ............................................ 37-12 
26. 7.5 MCY Standby Time .................................... 37-12 
Flood Control 
27. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ......... 37-12 
28. Blue River Lake, OR ........................................ 37-13 
29. Cottage Grove Lake, OR .................................. 37-13 
30. Dorena Lake, OR ............................................. 37-13 
31. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ......... 37-13 
32. Fall Creek Lake, OR .... ......................... 37-14 
33. Fern Ridge Lake, OR ........................................ 37-15 
Page 
34. Flood Control Work Under 
Special Authorization ....................................... 37-15 
35. Inspection of Completed Flood Control 
Projects ............................................................ 37-15 
36. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, 
OR and W A ...................................................... 37-16 
37. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA ............. 37-16 
38. Mount St. Helens and Vicininty, WA................ 37-16 
39. Rogue River, Grants Pass, OR.......................... 37-17 
40. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir 
O perations ....................................................... 37-17 
41. Willamette River Basin Bank 
Protection, OR ................................................. 37-17 
42. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR .................... 37-17 
Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 
43. Bonneville Lock and Dam - 
Lake Bonneville, OR and WA........................... 37-18 
44. Columbia River Fish Mitigation, 
O R and W A ..................................................... 37-19 
45. Columbia River Treaty Fishing Sites, 
OR and W A ..................................................... 37-19 
46. Cougar Lake, OR ............................................. 37-20 
47. Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR ........................... 37-20 
48. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR ......................... 37-20 
49. Hills Creek Lake, OR ....................................... 37-21 
50. John Day Lock and Dam - 
Lake Umatilla, OR and WA ............................. 37-21 
51. Lookout Point-Dexter Lakes, OR ..................... 37-22 
52. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ........ 37-22 
53. The Dalles Lock and Dam - 
Lake Celilo, WA and OR .................................. 37-23 
General Investigations 
54. Surveys ............................................................ 37-24 
55. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................. 37-24 
56. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ........ 37-24 
Tables 
Table 37-A Cost & Financial Statement ............... 37-25 
37-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Page 
Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation ...................... 37-32 
Table 37-C Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects .............................................. 37-38 
Table 37-D Not Applicable 
Table 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects ............................................... 37-39 
Table 37-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose 
Projects, Including Power .................... 37-41 
Table 37-G Deauthorized Projects ......................... 37-41 
Table 37-H Columbia and Lower Willamette River 
Below Vancouver, WA and 
Portland, OR ... ........................ 37-42 
Page 
Table 37-I Navigation Work Under Special 
Authorization ..................................... 37-42 
Table 37-J Project Condition Surveys ................... 37-42 
Table 37-K Willamette River at Willamette 
Falls, OR, Principal Features of 
Existing Canal and Locks ................... 37-43 
Table 37-L Flood Control Work Under Special 
Authorization ..................................... 37-43 
Table 37-M Flood Control Reservoir Operations ... 37-44 
Table 37-N Principal Data Concerning 
Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, 
and Powerplant ................................... 37-44 
Navigation 
1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, 
BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA 
Location. On Columbia River 40 miles east of Portland, 
OR about 146 miles above mouth of river. 
Existing project. The existing lock chamber is 76 feet 
wide and 500 feet long with 24.2 feet depth of water over 
the sill. Construction of a new navigation lock just south of 
the existing lock was authorized in the FY 1985 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 99-88,August 
15,1985. Inland Waterways Trust Fund will fund 50 percent 
of the project cost in accordance with the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 
17, 1986. The new lock chamber will be 86 feet wide and 
675 feet long with 19 feet depth of water over the sill. 
Estimated cost for construction of the new navigation lock 
is $348,100,000. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: 
Construction of the lock is completed. The lock opened to 
shipping on March 26, 1993. Restoration of the grounds 
and historic buildings is complete. 
2. CHETCO RIVER, OR 
Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range 
at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a 
circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at 
Brookings, OR, 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia 
River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 
18600 and 18203.) 
Existing project. Provides for two jetties at the mouth 
of the river. Modification of 1965 authorized an entrance 
channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning basin 
about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a 
small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. 
Also authorized was a 450-foot extension of north jetty with 
an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective 
dike about 1,800 feet long with a top elevation of 18 feet. 
Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range 
between mean lower low water and mean higher high water 
is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Construction of 
jetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock 
pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was 
accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification 
of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction 
of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was 
completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, 
turning basin and small boat access channel was completed 
in March 1970. The authorization was modified by WRDA 
92 to "direct the Secretary of the Army to assume 
maintenance of the approximately 200-foot long access 
channel to the south commercial boat basin consistent with 
authorized project depths". This channel will be maintained 
in lieu of the small boat access channel. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. The Port of Brookings has 
developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing 
boats and the other for sport boats, and a public boat 
launching ramp. There are four fish receiving docks and a 
sea-going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There 
is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total 
of 30,000 cubic yards of material was removed by contract 
hopper dredge. 
3. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILAME TE 
RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND 
PORTLAND, OR 
Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, 
through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United 
States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the 
Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 
160 miles south of Strait of Juan DeFuca. Total length of 
river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520,18521,18522, 
18523,18524,18526, and 18531; also Geological Survey Map 
of Washington.) Willamette River rises in Cascade Range 
in western Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into 
Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length 
from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project 
embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, 
37-2

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
WA, and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, 
OR. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, 
State of Oregon.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep 
and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the 
distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a 
channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, 
WA, River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River 
Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 40 feet deep, 800 
feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at 
Longview, WA, 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, 
and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in the 
Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet 
from the mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge (River 
Mile 11.6)which encompasses Portland Harbor area, subject 
to provisions that channel from mouth of Willamette River 
to turning basin at Vancouver, WA, be limited to 500 feet in 
width until need for additional width is demonstrated by 
developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary 
channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, 
WA; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens, (Oregon); 
and 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide connecting upper end of 
St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 
24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along frontage of town of 
Rainier, OR, extended to its upper and lower ends to deep 
water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from 
this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz 
River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present 
terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock 
downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser 
Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main 
ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 
feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and 
remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction 
of a small boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR, to include a 
sheet pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with 
a 30-foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore 
wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile 
dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from 
mouth of Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence 
to Portland and Vancouver, adopted low water. Tidal range 
between mean lower low water and mean higher high water 
at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and 
Vancouver, about 3 feet at low stage of rivers. Extreme tidal 
ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively.Annual freshets 
have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at 
Portland and Vancouver, they average about 12 feet, while 
highest know reached a stage of 33 feet above water at 
Portland. 
Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from 
Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA, to the sea was completed 
in 1976. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was 
completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz 
River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were 
completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year 
except for the period immediately following the annual 
freshet in May-June when shoaling occurs at several 
locations. Timing ofvessel movement with tidal fluctuations 
permit maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and 
Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge 
at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high 
tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between 
mouth ofWillamette river and Vancouver, WA, depths of 40 
and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable 
all year. (For details relating to previous project, see pages 
1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1746 of 
Annual Report for 1938.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements 
are described in full on page 37-3 of FY 1981Annual Report. 
Terminal facilities. At Portland, OR, there are six Port 
of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths equipped to 
handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lifton-
lift-off and roll-on-roll-off containers, and breakbulk 
vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major 
ship repair yard, which includes the west coast's largest, 
and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. Also 
available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities 
for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, 
grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement, and steel products. 
At Astoria, OR, there is a terminal with facilities for 
receiving and handling all types of general cargo. 
At Vancouver, WA, there are municipal facilities capable 
of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is 
completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for 
receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a 
low dock to handle roll-on-roll-off and side-port discharging 
vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 
4,500,000 bushels. 
Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia 
River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity 
of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, 
with a capacity of 600 tons. 
Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned 
and one private. 
At other locations on Columbia River between Portland 
and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private 
facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. 
These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered 
adequate for existing commerce. (For details, see Port Series 
Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 
1975 respectively.) 
A feasibility study for deepening the Columbia and Lower 
Willamette navigation channel is being conducted in 
cooperation with the Association of Lower Columbia River 
Ports. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular 
maintenance continued through the year. A total of 5.4 
million cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. 
hopper dredge Essayons removed 1,900,000 cubic yards, 
the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 762,000 cubic 
yards, the pipeline dredge Oregon removed 2,400,000 cubic 
yards, the contract hopper dredge Newport removed 150,000 
cubic yards, and the contract hopper dredge Westport 
removed 188,000 cubic yards. 
37-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA 
Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 
15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia 
River near its mouth. The bay is separated from the river 
by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above 
high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) 
Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet deep, 
about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and 
a west channel 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide for the first 
2000 feet, then 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the boat 
basin; a channel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a 
distance of about 4 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of 
reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and 
mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 
13 feet. 
Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand 
Island was completed in 1934. This portion of authorized 
project is not passable and is not maintained at the present 
time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished 
September 1948. Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and 
boat basin and breakwater construction at Ilwaco, WA, was 
finished December 1957, and again, deepening of the west 
channel to 16 feet completed in August 1985 under Section 
107, finished the project. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, 
for fishing craft, barges and tow-boats. Small-boat basin 
and protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous 
fishing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are 
considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: No 
dredging was required. Performed contract close-out 
activities. 
5. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN 
CHINOOK, WA, AND HEAD OF SAND 
ISLAND 
Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north 
side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic 
Survey Chart 6151.) 
Existing Project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet 
wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook; a 
turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet 
deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; 
reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; 
and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence 
northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, 
Chinook, WA. Tidal range between mean lower low water 
and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme 
about 13 feet. 
Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. 
The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished 
September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was 
completed September 1962. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns 
a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish 
buying company is located at Chinook. A portion of wharf 
is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel 
there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for 
mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate 
terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching 
ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply 
facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 115,000 
cubic yards of material was removed by contract dredge. 
6. COLUMBIA RiVER AT THE MOUTH, OR 
AND WA 
Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles 
north or San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles 
downstream of Portland, OR and Vancouver, WA. For 
description of Columbia River see Section 4. 
Existing project. Provides for a one-half-mile-wide 
channel across a bar 55 feet deep (mean lower low water) 
for the northernmost 2,000 feet, and 48 feet deep (mean 
lower low water) along the southern 640 feet, to be secured 
by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "A"on the north shore 
and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long 
and the south jetty about 6.6 miles long, spur jetty "A" is 
about 0.3 miles long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower 
low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and 
extreme about 13 feet. 
The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was 
completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north 
jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A") was completed in 1939 
(repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. 
Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging 
of the 48-foot bar channel started April 1956 was completed 
in September 1957. South jetty rehabilitation started June 
1962 was completed September 1964. North jetty 
rehabilitation started January 1965 was completed April 
1965. Additional rehabilitation of the south jetty was 
initiated in May 1982 and completed in September 1982. 
Deepening bar channel to 55 feet completed September 
1984. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. 
(For details relating to previous projects, see page 1999, 
Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report 
for 1938.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests 
contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty 
which was completed in 1917. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work was 
authorized under Section 1135 of the Water Resource 
Development Act of 1986, as amended. This authority 
allows modifications to structures and operations of 
constructed Corps projects to improve the quality of the 
environment. In fiscal year 1995, plans and specifications 
were prepared and construction completed for the Trestle 
Bay Restoration project. The modification is located at river 
mile 7 and consists of lowering (removal) of 500 foot section 
of the Columbia River South Jetty to -5.6 mean sea level. 
The lowered section allows for unimpeded access by 
37-4

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
fisheries resources to 603 acres of intertidal habitat and 
increases nutrient availability for the support populations 
of estuarine, marine, and anadromous fish stocks. 
Construction was completed on September 25,1995, except 
for post construction monitoring which is scheduled to 
continue through fiscal year 1998. The modifications will 
not increase the operation, maintenance, repair, 
replacement and rehabilitation cost for the Columbia River 
at the Mouth navigation project. The non-federal sponsor 
is the State of Oregon Parks and Recreation Department. 
The total cost for this modification, including all design and 
construction is estimated at $237,650, of which $178,240 is 
federal and $59,410 is non-federal. Excluded is the costs 
for the feasibility report which was prepared under the 
authority of Section 216 of the Rivers and Harbors Flood 
Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, and for which 
funding was provided in the Energy and Water 
Appropriations Act of 1994, Public Law 103-126. 
Maintenance: A total of 3 million cubic yards of material 
was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 
1.5 million cubic yards of material, and the contract hopper 
dredge Newport removed 1.5 million cubic yards. 
7. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN 
VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR 
Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate 
Bridge at Vancouver, WA, 106.5 miles above mouth and The 
Dalles, OR, mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description 
of Columbia River, See Section 3, "Columbia and Lower 
Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR." 
Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water 
and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, WA, and The Dalles, 
OR, 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 
200 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, OR; 
a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development 
in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, WA; a boat basin at 
Hood River, OR, 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal 
Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same 
depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly 
side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, WA, 10 feet 
deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and 
about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at 
normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 
feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near 
east end of channel; and construction of The Dalles small 
boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom 
protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 
8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. 
Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean 
higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at 
Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme 
tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. 
Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles 
small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredging 
at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. 
Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, 
OR, was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth 
between Vancouver, WA, and Bonneville, OR, was completed 
May 1938. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville 
Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present time, 
the channel is maintained to a depth of 16 feet, which is 
adequate for using traffic. Construction of a boat basin at 
Hood River, OR, and of Camas-Washougal, WA, turning 
basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a 
barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, WA, was 
completed September 1963. Small boat recreation channel 
100 feet wide 6 feet deep at South Channel Government 
Island completed 1985 under section 107. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, WA, upstream of 
Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of 
former shipyard are numerous ship-building facilities 
equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in 
this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, 
two boat building businesses, and a storage dock with gantry 
crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. 
At Camas, WA, about 13.5 miles upstream from 
Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of 
paper-mill supplies and paper to and from barges, and 
facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. 
At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is 
a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and 
barges. There is a one-story timber and corrugated iron 
warehouse, 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. A private elevator 
with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 
1,113,800-bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to barges 
are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and 
water connections. There is a port owned rail connection 
about three-fourths mile below municipal wharf where 
certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad 
cars and barges. 
At numerous locations along the entire waterway there 
are facilities for transfer of logs to water from trucks and 
public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered 
adequate for present commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveywas performed.A contract pipeline dredge 
removed 8,000 cubic yards of material from Government 
Island South Channel. 
8 COLUMBIA RiVER, SEAFARERS 
MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OR 
Location. The memorial will be located at Point Adams, 
in the City of Warrenton, OR, at River Mile 8.5 on the 
Columbia River approximately 50 yards off shore and 
adjacent to an existing Corps of Engineers pile dike. 
Existing project. None. 
Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
(LCA) with the local sponsor, City ofWarrenton, OR, is being 
developed. This LCA will require the sponsor to pay for all 
costs above the authorized $150,000 for engineering, design, 
acquisition and construction of a support structure to serve 
as the foundation for the Seafarers Memorial. In addition, 
37-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
the sponsor is providing the statue for which the foundation 
structure is being built. 
Operations during fiscal year. All work has been 
suspended until the LCA has been approved by all parties 
and the local sponsor has raised sufficient funds for 
purchase of the statue and any costs above the $150,000 
limit for the support structure. 
9. COLUMBIA RIVER, VANCOUVER DEEP 
DRAFT ANCHORAGE, WA 
Location. The deep draft anchorage, which includes the 
U.S. Coast Guard designed anchorage area near Hayden 
Island, is located on the Oregon side of the existing federally 
authorized 40-foot Columbia River channel, near Vancouver, 
Washington, between river miles 102 and 103. 
Existing project. Work was authorized under special 
continuing authority contained in Section 107 of the Rivers 
and HarborAct of 1960, as amended, for navigation projects. 
The existing procedure being used is for the Columbia River 
Pilots to decide where to anchor a vessel. The vessel drops 
either one or two bow anchors at the recommendation of 
the pilots. At the onset of anchoring, the vessel is outside of 
the boundary of the 40-foot navigation channel. As wind 
conditions change, the probability of a vessel tending to 
swing on its anchor increases. This then creates a hazardous 
condition for vessels navigating the main channel as they 
attempt to maneuver around anchored vessels that are 
partially in the channel. Safe anchoring in the Columbia 
River is dependent upon a combination of several factors: 
water and wind currents, tides, vessel size (overall length, 
draft, and cargo volume), and the level of congestion in the 
anchoring area. The project which was constructed, consists 
of two anchorage areas in the Columbia River by placement 
of two stern anchor buoys, one at each location. The 
downstream one is designated as a deep site for a loaded or 
fully laden vessel. A buoy was placed in the river 300 feet 
off the existing channel. The second buoy was placed 725 
feet off the existing channel, which would be designated 
for light laden vessels or empty vessels. The estimated 
cost for preparation of plans and specifications and the 
construction of the project is $384,000, of which $288,000 
is federal and $96,000 cash is non-federal. The non-federal 
sponsors, Port of Portland and Port of Vancouver, provided 
$55,500 and $40,500, respectively. 
Local cooperation. The Ports of Portland and 
Vancouver signed Project Cooperation Agreements on 
January 3, 1994. In accordance with cost sharing 
requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986, the federal government will initially provide 75 
percent of the costs associated with the general navigation 
features of the Project. The non-federal sponsors are 
required to provide 25 percent of the total construction cost 
of the general navigation features up front. The sponsors 
are also required to provide an additional 10 percent of the 
cost of the general navigation features of the project in cash 
over a period not to exceed 30 years. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Replaced 
two 8-foot diameter buoys with 11.5-foot diameter buoys 
for safety reasons. 
10. COOS BAY, OR 
Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of 
Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. 
It is about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at 
high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 
and 18587.) 
Existing project. Two rubblemound, high-tide jetties 
at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep 
and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 
300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about 
mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 
feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 
feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); 
turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and 
Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 
1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide 
from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 
17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, 
with a connecting channel, 16 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 
6,200 feet long, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction 
of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference 
is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower 
low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme 
is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. 
South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, 
and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored 
in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full 
length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep 
and generally 300 feet wide from entrance of Isthmus 
Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel 
to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock 
was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston 
Channel and small-boat basin was completed in September 
1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 
and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was 
completed in August 1989. Construction of the deeper and 
wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. Deepening 
of Charleston channel and turning basin completed in 1985 
under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, 
see page 1987 to Annual Report for 1915 and page 1728 of 
Annual Report for 1938.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements 
are described in full on page 37-5 of FY 1981Annual Report. 
Terminal facilities.At North Bend there is a municipal 
dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of 
privately owned mill docks, and three oil receiving terminals 
in vicinity. 
At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a 
frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; 
several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and 
three lumber docks with 1,300-foot, 576-foot and 500-foot 
frontages, respectively. 
In the North Spit industrial area, there is one woodchip 
loading facility having a frontage of 1200 feet and a smaller 
T-dock operated by the Port of Coos Bay. 
At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200-foot dock. 
37-6

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with 
frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, owned by Port of 
Coos Bay, for receipt of petroleum products by barge.Abarge 
slip also owned by the Port was completed in 1986. 
At Charleston there are wharves, for receipt of fresh fish 
and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing 
plant. There are also two municipally owned small-boat 
basins, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 
fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small 
craft are available at all facilities, and public launching 
ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private 
interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney 
Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. 
At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for 
wood chip ships. 
A feasibility study for deepening the Coos Bay navigation 
channel is being conducted in cooperation with the Oregon 
International Port of Coos Bay. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total 
of 1,273,000 cubic yards of material was removed. U.S. 
hopper dredge Yaquina removed 227,000 cubic yards, the 
contract dredge Newport removed 401,000 cubic yards, a 
contract dredge removed 546,000 cubic yards, and the U.S. 
hopper dredge Essayons removed 99,000 cubic yards. The 
sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced sand from shoal areas 
in Charleston entrance channel. 
11. COQUILLE RIVER, OR 
Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly 
for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at 
Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River 
and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA 
Charts 18580 and 18186.) 
Existing project. Two rubblemound high-tide jetties 
at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 
3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower 
low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 
mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to 
State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low 
water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower 
low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet 
and extreme about 10 feet. 
Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 
1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot 
extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South 
jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille 
Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. 
Port of Bandon constructed boat basin facility in conjunction 
with protective breakwater and entrance channel 
construction in 1985, under Section 107. (For details relating 
to previous projects, see page 1986 of Annual Report for 
1915 and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938.) 
A plan to deepen the entrance channel of the Coquille 
River from 13 feet to 18 feet was approved in May 1988. 
The economics were reevaluated in FY1993 and the project 
was not economically feasible at this time. 
Local cooperation. None required. However, 
restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation 
Facilities at Completed Projects, funding required 50 
percent cost sharing with non-Federal sponsor (Oregon 
State Parks). 
Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A publicly owned 
wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract 
hopper dredge Northerly Island removed 22,000 cubic yards 
of material from entrance channel. 
12. DEPOE BAY, OR 
Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of 
mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey 
Chart 5902.) 
Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; 
an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; an inner 
basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with 
retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending 
beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal 
range between mean lower low water and mean higher high 
water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as 
originally authorized was completed in 1939 and project 
modifications, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, 
were accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist 
of landings and floats to accommodate operators of 
excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities 
considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. A condition survey 
was performed. 
13. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTH ORIZATION 
Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, 
Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization): 
Construction of a deep draft anchorage at Columbia 
River, Vancouver is discussed in Section 9. Construction of 
a navigation channel at Westport, OR - Puget Island, WA 
is discussed in Section 21. 
Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See 
Table 37-I for expenditures under Section 107 during the 
fiscal year. 
Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 
111, Public Law 90-483 (preauthorization): 
Construction of a shoreline mitigation project at Umpqua 
River, Winchester Bay, OR is discussed in Section 21. 
Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See 
Table 37-I for expenditures under Section 111 during the 
fiscal year. 
37-7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
14. PORT ORFORD, OR 
Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia 
River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. 
(NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, 
Port Orford, OR) 
Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 55-foot 
extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and 
dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide 
and 16 feet deep. Breakwater was completed October, 1968. 
Turning basin was completed September 1971. The 
authorization was modified by WRDA 92 to allow the Corps 
to maintain the authorized navigation channel within 50 
feet of the port facility. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. A dock which is a timber piling 
structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic 
crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs 
and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. 
Expansion of the dock structure to 210 x 220 feet is complete. 
The installation of the second hydraulic crane was 
completed in FY 1986. About 150 fishing and private boats 
use this dock each year. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: During 
the summer months the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 
47 days. A contractor sub-pump dredged 6,000 cubic yards. 
15. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS 
Surveys were conducted during the fiscal year at a cost 
of $119,848; (See Table 37-J). 
16. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD 
BEACH, OR 
Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern 
Oregon; flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties 
into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia 
River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA 
Chart 18202.) 
Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 
13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point 
immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, 
including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below 
bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, 
and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin 
was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a 
point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to 
permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed 
adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane 
of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water 
and mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 
14 feet. 
Project as authorized has been completed. Construction 
of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. 
Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by 
government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty 
rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 
1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract 
awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished 
when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. 
Contract was terminated as further construction at that 
location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work 
at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A 
breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was 
completed during 1973. In 1985, three pile dikes, located 
on the south side of channel oceanward of the boat basin 
entrance, were completed. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are various landings for 
fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river 
from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion 
passengers and small freight items destined for various 
private landings between Wedderburn and Agness, OR. 
Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The 
contract hopper dredge Northerly Island removed 96,000 
cubic yards, contract pipeline removed 48,000 cubic yards, 
and the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 18 days. 
17. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR 
Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles 
westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles 
south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of 
San Francisco Bay, CA. (See NOAA Charts 19583 and 
18580.) 
Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound 
jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 
feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 
feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet 
wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside 
the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 16 
feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, 
and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 
feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Siuslaw dock at 
Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence 
to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet 
deep, 300 feet wide, and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water 
is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low 
water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 
feet and extreme about 11 feet. During low stages of river, 
tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles above mouth. 
(For details relating to previous project, see page 1988 of 
Annual Report for 1915.) 
A modification to the existing project was authorized by 
Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980. North and south jetty 
modifications were completed in FY 86. Modifications 
provide for extending the north and south jetties by 1,900 
and 2,300 feet respectively. The jetty extensions terminate 
at approximately the minus 25-foot contour. Spur jetties 
were constructed on each jetty extension to reduce longshore 
currents from transporting material around the heads of 
the jetties. Each spur jetty is 400 feet long and originates 
approximately 900 feet shoreward of the jetty head. The 
north jetty spur is oriented 45 degrees to the north of the 
existing jetty alignment and the south jetty spur 45 degrees 
to the south of the jetty alignment. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
37-8

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
Terminal facilities. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide 
and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance 
and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of 
wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies 
gasoline, oil and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence 
consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities 
for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock 
with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. 
Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with 
accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. 
Modern docks for loading ocean-going barges with 
packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton and owned by 
the Davison Lumber Company. 
There are also a number of private landings and log 
booms between Cushman and Mapleton to accommodate 
river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for 
existing traffic. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. 
hopper dredge Yaquina removed 187,000 cubic yards of 
material, and the sand bypasser Sandwick worked 11 
days. 
18. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR 
Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles 
from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters 
Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below 
Astoria, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) 
Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 
200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River 
to railroad bridge at Warrenton, OR, distance of 1.8 miles, 
turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at 
mean lower low water at Warrenton, OR, and channel 7 
feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at 
log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel 
above railroad bridge. Channel is maintained to 16 feet 
which is adequate for user traffic. Mean lower low water is 
plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low 
water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme 
is about 13 feet. 
Project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel 
and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of 
small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, OR, was completed 
October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished 
in August 1958. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. City ofWarrenton owns wharf with 
a 300-foot frontage open to pubic on equal terms. One 
privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is 
used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately 
owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use 
by a maximum of 80 small boats. Small-boat basin has 
facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft, and a 
privately owned lumber mill has a barge loading facility 
for chips and lumber. Facilities are considered adequate 
for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. 
hopper dredge Yaquina removed 13,000 cubic yards of 
material. 
19. TILLAMOOK BAYAND BAR, OR 
Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south 
of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 
18558.) 
Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet 
long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on 
south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such 
width as can be practically and economically obtained; for 
a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water 
in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet 
deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at 
Garibaldi, OR. Project also provides for improvement of 
Bayocean Peninsula, OR, by construction of sand and rockfill 
dike 1.4 miles long, on alignment extending between Pitcher 
Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane 
of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water 
and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 14 
feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. 
Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, 
classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north 
jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956 
and small-boat basin in 1958. The north jetty was 
rehabilitated in 1965 and again in 1991. South jetty 
construction was initiated in 1969, extended in 1974, and 
completed to the authorized 8,000 feet in 1978. 18 foot 
channel to Miami Cove is inactive due to mill closure. (For 
details relating to previous projects, see page 1989 ofAnnual 
Report for 1915 and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements 
are described in fullon page 37-9 of FY 1981Annual Report. 
Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facili'ty owned by 
the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, 
a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, 
towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate 
facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. A 
privately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for 
recreational craft. 
At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively 
for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered 
adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections 
performed. 
20. UMPQUA RIVER, OR 
Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 
120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south 
of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco 
Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) 
Existing project.Ajetty on north side of entrance about 
8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a 
37-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging 
to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a 
river channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth 
to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning 
basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 22 
feet deep; deepening of channel at Winchester Bay to 16 
feet deep by 100 feet wide for 3,100 feet, then adding 16 
feet deep by 100 feet wide for 500 feet, and 12 feet deep by 
75 feet wide for 950 feet beyond boat basin making up the 
East Boat Channel. A new West Boat Channel was added 
16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 4,300 feet and completed 
in 1984. Project was modified in 1951 to provide a channel 
in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently 
inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal 
range between mean lower low water and mean higher high 
water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 
11 feet. 
North jetty was completed in 1930. Extension to original 
south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot 
channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed 
in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was 
completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and 
mooring basin in 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was 
completed August, 1963. Extension of training jetty was 
completed October 9,1980. Deepening Winchester Bay East 
Channel and new West Channel completed 1984 under 
Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see 
page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898 and page 1732 of 
Annual Report for 1938.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet 
of wharf frontage. Also there is an oil unloading facility 
owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker 
barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of 
water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and 
another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not 
been used generally for commercial shipping. 
On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf 
was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage 
for lumber and available to all on equal terms. 
At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is 
a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities 
are considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. 
hopper dredge Yaquina removed 259,000 cubic yards of 
material, and the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 11 days 
at Winchester Bay. 
21. UMPQUA RIVER, WINCHESTER BAY, 
OR
Location. The project is located approximately 5 miles 
west of Reedsport, Oregon, in Winchester Bay on the left 
bank of the Umpqua River near its entrance to the Pacific 
Ocean at river mile 1. The Umpqua River entrance is 
located about 178 miles south of the Columbia River and 
467 miles north of San Francisco Bay. 
Existing project. New work: Work was authorized 
under the special continuing authority contained in Section 
111 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Flood Control Act of 
1968, as amended. This authority allows for mitigation of 
shoreline damages attributable to Federal navigation 
projects. Extending the training jetty to connect to the 
seaward end of the south jetty has allowed increased wave 
energy to reach farther into the Umpqua River estuary. 
This increased energy has caused damages to existing 
facilities and shoreline on both shores of the estuary. 
Damages on the north shore is relatively minor and consists 
of minor shoreline erosion along the inner portion of the 
north jetty. The most severe damages occurred along the 
West Spit which protects the Salmon Harbor small boat 
basin. Salmon Harbor is a very popular, well-developed 
boat harbor that provides for approximately 900 moorage 
slips. The project as constructed consists of 2,760 feet of 
stone revetment along the west face of the spit. Costs of 
$644,300 for all planning, design, and construction of the 
project was 100% Federal. 
Local cooperation. The Port of Umpqua, OR, the local 
non-federal sponsor, provided lands, easements, and rightsof-
way, and agreed to operate and maintain the project in 
accordance with the cost sharing requirements of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Plans and 
specifications were completed and a contract for 
construction of the project was awarded on January 12, 
1995. Construction was completed on March 22, 1995. 
22. WESTPORT, OR- PUGET ISLAND WA, 
(WAHKIAKUM FERRY) 
Location. The Wahkiakum Ferry route extends across 
the Columbia River at approximately River Mile 43, 
between Westport, in Clatsop County, Oregon and Puget 
Island, Wahkiakum County, Washington. These counties 
are located about 70 miles west of Portland, Oregon. 
Existing project. Work was authorized under special 
continuing authority contained in Section 107 of the Rivers 
and HarborAct of 1960, as amended, for navigation projects. 
Shoaling occurs directly offshore of the ferry dock at Puget 
Island and cannot be circumnavigated, causing delays and 
unsafe operation conditions for the ferry, especially at low 
tide. The ferry has been restricted to half capacity during 
part of the year. The project consists of a channel extending 
1,900 feet from the Wahkiakum County Ferry ramp at Puget 
Island to the existing federally authorized Columbia River 
navigation channel. This newly dredged channel is 9 feet 
deep (Columbia River Datum), 200 feet wide and 900 feet 
long: the remaining 1,000 feet extending to the existing 
authorized channel is in a naturally deep area and did not 
require dredging. The estimated cost for preparation of 
the plans and specifications and the construction of the 
project is $238,000, of which $214,200 is federal and $23,800 
cash is non-federal. 
Local cooperation. Wahkiakum County, Washington, 
the non-federal sponsor, executed a Project Cooperation 
Agreement (PCA) with the Corps of Engineers in October 
37-10

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
1993. In accordance with cost sharing requirements of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the federal 
government will initially provide 90 percent of the costs 
associated with the general navigation features of the 
project. The non-federal sponsor is required to provide 10 
percent of the total construction cost of the general 
navigation features up front. The sponsor is also required 
to provide an addition 10 percent of the cost of the general 
navigation features of the project in cash over a period not 
to exceed 30 years. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Post 
construction monitoring continued. 
23. WILAMETT RIVER AT 
WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR 
Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at 
Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon 
City, OR, about 26 miles above mouth of river. 
Existing project. Canal and locks were originally 
constructed by private interest in 1873 and were purchased 
by the United States inApril 1915 for $375,000. Final report 
on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in the 
Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 
percent complete. The project includes four locks a canal 
basin and an extra guard lock used to prevent flooding when 
river levels are high. The system acts as a fluid staircase 
between the upper and lower reaches of the Willamette 
River. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 
feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at 
Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 37-K. Ordinary 
fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and 
extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, 
ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. 
Until the 1940's, the gates were opened manually. Now, 
the gates are operated by hydraulic pumps controlled by 
switches in two control stations with the aid of closed-circuit 
television and radio communication.All the gates have been 
replaced under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks 
and grounds are in good condition and in continuous 
operation. New service building was completed in 1988 
costing $523,000. The project was placed on the National 
Register of Historic Places in 1974, and was established as 
an Oregon Civil Engineering Landmark in 1991. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. James River Paper has a timber 
wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by a 
concrete division wall built in lock canal by the United 
States. This wharf is used for receiving mill supplies and 
shipping paper and paper products. 
Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and 
maintenance performed. A contract to replace the overhead 
wiring was awarded. 
24. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR 
Location. Yaquina Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles 
south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 
and 18581.) 
Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties 
at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 
feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 
feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward 
from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width 
of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; 
a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin 
of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, 
and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot 
channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned 
railroad terminus at Yaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. 
Project also provides for two small boat mooring basins at 
Newport, OR. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. 
Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean 
higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. At 
mile 1.2 a 1,300 foot long breakwater protecting the Port of 
Newport South Beach Marina together with an entrance 
channel 8 feet long by 100 feet wide for a distance of 2,035 
feet. 
Project as originally authorized was completed in May 
1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and 
extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed 
in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and 
dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions 
were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north 
jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Under modification 
of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in 
September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30- 
foot river channel was completed in October 1968, and 
extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. The 
north jetty was rehabilitated in 1978 and again in 1988. 
(For details relating to previous projects see Annual Report 
for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annul Report for 1938, 
page 1736.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of 
bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Port of Newport has two 
berths capable of serving ocean-going vessels, one 435 feet 
long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth 
was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were 
constructed adjacent to deep water. There now is 40 acres 
of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 
acres were constructed in 1956-57. This facility has 
necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber 
cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open 
to all on equal terms. 
Port of Newport also has a public wharf with 300 feet of 
frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port of 
Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and 
sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies 
on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh 
fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily 
available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 
miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed 
South Beach Marina which can handle approximately 600 
pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public 
facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, 
boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. 
A dry boat moorage of 120 boats, is completed. A swing 
37-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
hoist with 3-ton capacity is currently available and one with 
60-ton capacity is planned. 
About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, 
subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a 
commercial fish farm facility 
About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, 
in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, 
maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small 
research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. 
Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and 
State of Oregon small boats. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. 
hopper dredge Yaquina removed 394,000 cubic yards. 
Continued MCCP study of deterioration of the north jetty 
and Major Maintenance Report. 
25. YAQUINA RIVER, OR 
Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows about 50 miles 
in a westerly direction, and empties into Yaquina Bay, on 
Oregon Coast. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 
Nos. 5802 and 6058.) 
Existing project. Provides for two controlling half-tide 
dikes of piling, brush, and stone, each about 1,100 feet long 
(constructed by local interests), and for a channel 10 feet 
deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 
200 feet wide in Depot Slough, extending from town of 
Yaquina near RM 4.0 to Toledo at RM 14.4. 
Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range 
between lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 
feet and extreme about 12 feet. Freshet heights are about 
12 feet at mouth of Depot Slough. Channel work authorized 
March 1913 was completed in 1914. Additional work 
authorized in 1960 was completed in 1969. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Near town of Yaquina at river 
mouth, which is also head ofYaquina Bay, there is a moorage 
for small vessels and a small-craft shipyard. The Port of 
Toledo has public-terminal facilities for accommodation of 
local craft. There are also privately owned facilities for 
loading lumber barges, receipt of bunker fuel, and log 
rollways for receipt of logs. These facilities are considered 
adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Condition surveys were performed. Contract clamshell 
dredge removed 36,000 cubic yards at Depot Slough. 
26. 7.5 MCY STANDBY TIME 
Existing Project. General Provisions of the FY 1995 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, PL 
103-316, state that "In fiscal year 1995 the Secretary (of 
the Army) shall advertise for competitive bid at least 
7,500,000 cubic yards of the hopper dredge volume 
accomplished with government-owned dredges in FY 1992. 
Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, the Secretary 
is authorized to use the dredge fleet of the Corps of 
Engineers to undertake projects when industry does not 
perform as required by the contract specifications or when 
the bids are more than 25 percent in excess of what the 
Secretary determines to be a fair and reasonable estimated 
cost of a well equipped contractor doing the work or to 
respond to emergency requirements." 
Operations during fiscal year. This requirement 
resulted in a 50 day reduction in scheduled work days for 
the Essayons and the Yaquina, and the contracting out of 
2.4 million cubic yards. The projects dredged were Columbia 
River at the Mouth, OR and WA; Columbia and Lower 
Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR; 
Coquille River, OR; Coos Bay, OR; Chetco River, OR; and 
Rogue River, OR. 
Flood Control 
27. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER 
BASIN, OR 
Location. In Jackson County, OR, on Upper Applegate 
River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 46, about 
23 airline miles southwest of Medford, OR. 
Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam, 242 
feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 
1,300 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chute-type spillway 
on the left abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and 
intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley 
floor. Lake, 5 miles long, provides 75,000 acre-feet of usable 
storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. 
Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square 
miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir is operated to 
provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water 
quality control, and recreation benefits. Recreation facilities 
were provided by the Corps of Engineers with operation 
and maintenance by the USFS under a memorandum of 
agreement. Project is complete and operating. 
Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State 
of Oregon insure maintenance of stream flow released for 
fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have 
to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with 
reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish 
and Wildlife made filing May 31,1962 with State Engineer 
for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows 
for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times 
specified in project authorization. The U.S. Bureau of 
Reclamation has made a feasibility study of Applegate 
Irrigation Division. The results of the study indicate that 
at present there does not appear to be a feasible Federal 
irrigation project for the Applegate River valley. Local 
interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by 
the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved 
by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine 
operation and maintenance was performed. Freshets 
regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue 
River are shown in Table 37-M. 
37-12

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
28. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR 
Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie 
River, 1.8 miles above confluence of the two streams at the 
confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 42 
miles easterly of Eugene, OR. 
Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 
feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the 
lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity 
chute-type spillway with two gates is located on left 
abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left shore 
of reservoir an earth-and-gravel fill embankment, about 
1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between 
Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from 
drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 
acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as 
a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette 
River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation 
and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by 
the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum ofAgreement. 
Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant 
works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for flood 
control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims 
was completed in May 1974. Eugene Water and Electric 
Board (EWEB) was granted a FERC license in November 
1989 to install two small hydropower units at Blue River 
Lake project. EWEB has delayed their plans for hydropower 
units pending the conclusion of a Corps proposal to add 
water temperature control to the regulating outlet tower. 
An EIS has been completed and is out for review. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Routine 
operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets 
regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major 
tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Table 37-M. 
29. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR 
Location. On Coast Fork of Willamette River, 29 miles 
from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, OR, on 
western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of 
Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with 
Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. 
Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at 
crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general 
foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 
feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity 
non-overflow section 96 feet long forming the right 
abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, 
consisting of three gate-controlled conduits, pass through 
spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of 
usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage 
area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of 
coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River 
Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for 
other purposes. Recreational development consists of day 
use and overnight facilities at five sites operated by the 
Corps of Engineers. Construction of project initiatedAugust 
1940 was completed April 1952. Dam and reservoir have 
been in continuous operation since September 1942. 
Local cooperation. Development of additional 
recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to 
cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of 
park facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine 
operation and maintenance work continued. Freshets 
regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette 
River are shown in Table 37-M. 
30. DORENA LAKE, OR 
Location. On Row River, OR, 7 miles from mouth. Row 
River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade 
Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork 
of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. 
Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 
feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the 
general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow spillway, 
200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five 
slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. 
Reservoir provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control 
storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles. The Project 
is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to 
protect Willamette RiverValley and increase low waterflows 
for navigational and other purposes. Construction of project 
initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for 
construction of additional recreation facilities that were 
funded under the Code 710 program. Future recreation 
facility construction will be accomplished in accordance with 
the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, OR. Dam and 
reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 
1949. 
Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing 
agreement has been in force with Lane County since Sept. 
1976. It includes 4 projects and 14 parks. At Dorena Lake, 
6 parks included in the agreement are managed by Lane 
County under a lease agreement. Future recreation 
development will require a supplement to the cost sharing 
agreement. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine 
operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated 
by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette 
Rivers are shown in Table 37-M. 
31. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER 
BASIN, OR 
Location. In Jackson County, OR at River Mile 1.7 on 
Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles 
northerly from Medford, OR. 
Existing project. Construction work for the 249-foot 
high roller compacted concrete gravity dam, 2,600 feet long 
at the crest, with a gate controlled concrete chute spillway, 
regulating outlet conduits, power penstock and multiple 
use intake tower attached to the upstream face of the dam 
has been stopped due to a court injunction. The project 
would control runoff from a drainage area of 135 square 
miles, and provide future municipal and industrial water 
37-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water 
quality control, and recreation benefits. 
Construction of the project was initiated in February 
1971. Work completed to date includes construction of roads 
and the main dam structure and outlet works to elevation 
1563 (approximately 1/3 proposed height). All lands for the 
project have been acquired with the exception of the clearing 
of water rights for a seemingly abandoned irrigation canal 
which originates within the project boundaries. 
Environmental statements were filed with Council of 
Environmental Quality June 15,1972 and Supplement No. 
1 addressing water quality and social/demographic 
information was filed with EPA on December 24, 1980. 
Estimated federal cost of project is $174,000,000. 
In October 1985, the Corps was advised by Oregon 
Natural Resources Council (ONRC), an environmental 
group, they intended to file suit against the government to 
halt construction of Elk Creek, on specific environmental 
issues. A hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction 
was scheduled before Oregon Federal District Court 
December 16,1986. On that date, the Court refused to grant 
the injunction to halt construction and bids were opened 
and the contract subsequently awarded to Ohbayashi Corp. 
An appeal was filed by ONRC in March, 1986 and heard by 
the 9th Circuit Court in July, 1986. 
On June 23,1987, the Circuit Court reversed the decision 
of the District Court and returned the case to the District' 
Court for appropriate injunctive relief. The resulting District 
court order issued in August and September 1987 allowed 
construction of the dam to El. 1563 ft. (approximately 1/3 
the height of the dam), backfilling of the foundation key 
trench, aggregate processing, quarry restoration, and other 
miscellaneous work. The construction of the main dam to 
elevation 1563 was reached in mid-January 1988. The 
Department of Justice petitioned the 9th Circuit Court for 
a rehearing. On December 10, 1987 the 9th Circuit Court 
rejected the petition for a rehearing, requiring the 
termination of the existing main dam and reservoir clearing 
contracts. The Department of Justice petitioned with the 
U.S. Supreme Court for a review of the decisions made by 
the 9th Circuit Court. The hearing before the U.S. Supreme 
Court was held May 1, 1989. The U.S. Supreme Court 
remanded the case back for injunctive relief. In September 
1989, the District Court was requested by the Corps to 
remand the case back to the Corps for preparation of a 
supplemental EIS. 
To lift the injunction against the dam a Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement (EISS) has been prepared 
to address cumulative effects. Additional studies have been 
conducted in water temperature and turbidity, and fish and 
wildlife. The EISS identified a preferred interim operating 
alternative of operating the project without a conservation 
pool. The reservoir would only temporarily store water 
during flood control operations. 
On July 22, 1992, the Department of Justice filed a 
motion with the court to remove the injunction. A hearing 
was held on May 20, 1993. The ONRC and Department of 
Justice filed appeals with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 
over the issues of the legal sufficiency of the EISS and on 
the authority of the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land 
Management to issue a determination of impacts under 
the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The Ninth Circuit Court of 
Appeals ruled on the two cases on April 21, 1995. In a 
unanimous decision, the Court ruled that the U.S. Forest 
Service and Bureau of Land Management do not have a 
veto authority over purely Federal projects under the Wild 
and Scenic Rivers Act where Congress makes the decision 
to authorize and fund their development. In a 2-1 decision, 
the Court also reversed the District Court decision that 
EISS #2 met the requirements of the earlier Ninth Circuit 
opinion and awarded attorney fees to the plaintiffs. The 
case was remanded with instructions to prepare a third 
supplement adequately addressing all issues raised under 
the NEPA process. In FY 1993, Congress added $2,500,000 
for design necessary to complete the project pending 
removal of the injunction. 
Localcooperation.Authorizing act requires that State 
of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure 
maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In 
addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid 
in a manner and to an extent consistent with the U.S. 
Bureau of Reclamation laws and policies. On February 24, 
1966, State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for 
withdrawal rights of 25 cubic feet per second to maintain a 
minimum flow for fish. Development of recreation facilities 
require a local sponsor willing to cost share in recreation 
development and assume operations and maintenance of 
park facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Operation 
and maintenance during the construction phase of the 
project, fishery evaluation studies, and water quality 
analysis. 
32. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR 
Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork 
Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the 
streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, OR. 
Existingproject.An earth-and-gravel fill embankment 
about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest 
point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity 
spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. 
Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control 
storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir 
system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low 
waterflows for navigation and other purposes. 
Construction of project began May 1962 and was 
essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for 
flood control was effective October 1965. Sky Camp Lodge 
was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities 
will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract 
with Bethel School District. Bethel School District has a 
sub-agreement with the Springfield Kiwanis Club for 
management of this facility. The Corps manages one park 
at the project. 
Local cooperation. Fall Creek Lake is included in the 
Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Two 
37-14

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. 
Future development will require a supplement to the cost 
sharing agreement. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. Freshets 
regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a 
tributary of the Middle Fork, Willamette River are shown 
in Table 37-M. 
33. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR 
Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the 
mouth. LongTom River rises in Lane county, OR, on eastern 
slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters 
Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. 
Existing project. A main dam 6,624 feet long at crest 
and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation 
and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along 
northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an 
earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete 
gravity spillway near left abutment with a non-overflow 
structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an 
overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic 
gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom 
River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acrefeet 
of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 
tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir 
Sprotects Long Tom River Valley and is operated as a unit of 
coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River 
Valley generally and to increase low water-flows for 
navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally 
constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. Provision of 
additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 
by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point 
of the general foundation. 
Construction of project initiated April 1940 was 
completed August 1951, except for provision of additional 
storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed 
April 1965, and construction of additional recreation 
facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Dam and 
reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 
1941. Development of future recreation facilities will be in 
accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane county, 
and requires a 50 percent contribution by the county. 
Development is subject to availability of funds by the 
Government and the county. 
Work was authorized under the special continuing 
authority contained in Section 1135 of the Water Resource 
Development Act of 1986, as amended. In fiscal year 1993, 
plans and specifications were prepared and construction 
for the Fern Ridge, Long Tom River, Fisher Butte waterfowl 
impoundments was initiated. The modification consists of 
three impoundments (totaling 115 acres) by constructing 
levees and ditches, installing an irrigation water supply 
pump and 8-inch diameter water supply pipeline, 
construction of overflow spillways, and installation of 
drainage culverts with positive closure gates. This 
modification was constructed under a cooperative 
agreement with the Bureau of Land Management and was 
completed on May 6, 1994. The non-federal sponsor was 
the State of Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Total 
cost for this modification, including all planning, design, 
and construction was $210,664, of which $157,998 is federal 
and $52,666 is non-federal. 
Local cooperation. Fern Ridge Lake is included in the 
Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Three 
parks are managed by Lane County under lease 
agreements. Future development will require a supplement 
to the cost sharing agreement. The Oregon Department of 
Fish and Wildlife manages 5,000 acres of land and water 
for migratory waterfowl under a lease agreement. 
Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Routine 
operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated 
by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown 
in Table 37-M. 
34. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 
of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th 
Congress, as amended (preauthorization): 
Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See 
Table 37-L for expenditures under Section 205 during the 
fiscal year. 
Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to 
Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 
526, 79th Congress, as amended (preauthorization): 
Construction of a bank protection project on Rogue River 
Grants Pass, OR is discussed in Section 39. 
Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See 
Table 37-L for expenditures under Section 14 during the 
fiscal year. 
Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood 
fighting, and rescue work pursuant to Public Law 
99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation: 
Federal costs for the fiscal year were: $356,574 for 
disaster preparedness; and $8,561 for field investigations. 
National Emergency Preparedness Program fiscal year 
costs were $186,172. 
Project modification for the improvement of the 
environment pursuant to Section 1135 (b), Public 
Law 99-362 as amended: 
Construction of the Trestle Bay environmental 
restoration project is discussed in Section 6. Feasibility and 
reconnaissance studies continued. 
35. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood 
protection works are used to determine maintenance 
condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those 
works are being properly maintained by local interests. A 
37-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
total of 56 leveed areas and 209 bank protection works are 
inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower 
Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, 
in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette 
River Basin. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette 
River Basin are supplemented by an onsite inspection at 
locations requiring maintenance. A representative of 
sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District 
representatives performing the levee inspections. 
Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were 
discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a 
report was made to each sponsor with recommendations 
for improving maintenance. The program to improve 
maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by 
House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was 
continued. Fiscal year costs were $164,526. 
36. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN 
BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA 
Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between 
Sandy River, OR, and mouth of Columbia River. 
Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,000 
linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along 
Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along 
principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing 
improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands 
from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general 
comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other 
purposes in Columbia River Basin. Construction of project 
began in July 1961 and is 88 percent complete. A total of 
191,000 linear feet of bank protection work at 84 locations 
has been completed. Estimated Federal cost is $25,600,000. 
Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides 
local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make 
necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; 
hold the United States free from damages; and maintain 
and operate completed works. Under Section 103 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Local Interests 
will also be required to make a cash contribution for 
construction of each site. Estimated costs for all 
requirements of local cooperation are $1,500,000. 
Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of 
coordination with sponsors and evaluation of local erosion 
problems continued. 
37. MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT 
CONTROL, WA 
Location. On the North Fork Toutle River, 2 miles 
upstream from its confluence with the Green River, in 
Cowlitz County, southwest Washington. The river systems 
impacted by the project include Toutle, Cowlitz and 
Columbia Rivers. Most of the population affected by the 
problems reside in the communities of Longview, Kelso, 
Lexington, and Castle Rock, Washington. 
Existing project. The project was authorized by the 
Supplement Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 88,99th 
Congress, August 15, 1985). The Act includes authorization 
"... to construct, operate and maintain a sediment retention 
structure near the confluence of the Toutle and Green River, 
Washington, with such design features and associated 
downstream actions as are necessary, in accordance with 
the Feasibility Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
December 1984." The project will provide a permanent 
solution to potential flooding on the Cowlitz River from 
sedimentation problems created by the eruption of Mt. St. 
Helens. The Decision document recommended construction 
of a single sediment retention structure (SRS) with a 125- 
foot high spillway at the Green River site on the North 
Fork Toutle River, improvements to the levee system at 
Kelso, Washington, and dredging downstream from the SRS. 
Local cooperation. Local interests were responsible 
for provision of all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for 
the sediment retention structure, dredging disposal areas, 
and levee improvements. Local interests were also 
responsible for all alterations and relocations of buildings, 
roads, bridges and other structures or utilities made 
necessary by implementation of the project. In addition, 
operation and maintenance of fish facilities, the levee 
system at Kelso and dredged material disposal sites are 
the responsibility of local interests. Cowlitz County offers 
visitor services in their viewpoint area. Non-federal cash 
contribution is $3,690,000 and the estimated non-federal 
land, easements, right-of-ways, and relocations costs are 
$21,000,000. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Fish and 
wildlife mitigation studies, real estate activities and 
preparation of as-built drawings continued. 
Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance 
performed. 
38. MOUNT ST. HELENS AND VICINITY, 
WA
Location. Along the Cowlitz and Toutle rivers from 
Spirit Lake at the base of Mount St. Helens to the confluence 
of the Cowlitz with the Columbia River (River Mile 68) 
approximately 55 miles downstream of Portland, OR. 
Existing project. The May 18, 1980 eruption of Mount 
St. Helens dramatically altered the hydraulic and 
hydrographic regimes of the Cowlitz and Toutle River 
valleys. Mudflows triggered by the eruption carried large 
volumes of sediment from the debris avalanche into these 
river valleys, reducing hydraulic capacity to the point where 
major flooding could be expected even with normal runoff. 
Storm runoff and surface drainage continue to deliver 
sediment from the debris avalanche into the rivers. Funds 
allocated under Public Law 84-99 were used for major 
recovery work on the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers. 
In late FY 1983, interim flood control measures were 
implemented under the authority of Public Law 98-63 to 
assure 100-year flood protection to developed areas along 
the Cowlitz River. Measures implemented are primarily 
dredging on the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers, temporary levee 
improvements on the Cowlitz River and a monitoring 
program. 
37-16

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
Local cooperation. Local sponsors are responsible for 
obtaining any additional lands, easements, and rights-ofway. 
The State of Washington has agreed to act as the local 
sponsor.. State funds have been appropriated for acquisition 
of lands and related expenses for Mount St. Helens recovery 
operations. The State of Washington has spent over 
$4,500,000 to procure disposal sites for dredged material. 
Operations during fiscal year. The settlement of 
contract claims was the only activity in the fiscal year. 
39. ROUGE RIVER, GRANTS PASS, OR 
Location. The project is located in the southeastern 
portion of the city limits of Grants Pass, Oregon, on the 
right bank of the Rogue River at river mile 101.8 and is 
situated immediately downstream of the State Highway 
199 bridge. 
Existing project. New work: Work was authorized 
under the special continuing authority contained in Section 
14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. This 
authority allows construction of emergency bank protection 
to prevent flood damage to public works. The project as 
constructed consists of supporting the river bank by placing 
a concrete plug in an erosion pocket, located in the face of a 
nearly vertical 40 foot high bank. The erosion area was 
approximately 40 feet wide, 10 feet high and 15 feet deep 
tapering to zero feet deep and zero feet high at each end. 
The erosion threatened the Grants Pass water treatment 
plants static mixer, transmission piping and an access road. 
Loss of the access road would have rendered the chlorine 
storage room useless. Concrete was placed in successive 
lifts until the erosion pocket was filled. Included in this 
project was a drainage layer to relieve groundwater seepage 
from the slope. Costs for all planning, design, and 
construction of the project was $148,727, of which $121,545 
is federal and $27,182 is non-federal. 
Local cooperation. The City of Grants Pass, OR, the 
local non-federal sponsor, provided lands, easements and 
rights-of-way at no cost. In addition, the City of Grants 
Pass participated financially in accordance with the cost 
sharing requirements of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Plans and 
specifications were prepared and a contract for construction 
of the project was awarded on June 30,1995. Construction 
was completed on August 11, 1995. 
40. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL 
RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 
Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations 
at four Bureau of Reclamation projects (Prineville, Ochoco, 
Emigrant, and Scoggins), one local project operated by 
Douglas County (Galesville), and one municipal power 
project operated by Tacoma City Light (Mossyrock). The 
projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, 
thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the 
Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 
1944. 
The four Bureau of Reclamation projects, Douglas County 
project and Mossyrock project were operated during the 
fiscal year within the flood control regulations specified for 
each project. Total cost of monitoring the six projects during 
the fiscal year was $48,943. 
41. WILLAMEITE RIVER BASIN BANK 
PROTECTION, OR 
Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between 
Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south of 
Eugene to Portland, OR. 
Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and 
reveting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber 
bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; 
and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and 
prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette 
River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is 
a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection at 236 
locations. Estimated Federal cost is $30,700,000. 
Construction of project began in 1938 and is 96 percent 
complete. A total of 489,795 linear feet of bank protection 
work at 230 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, 
pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel 
improvements, have been completed on Willamette River 
and tributaries. 
Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood ControlAct of 1936 
and Section 103, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local 
cooperation under terms of project authorization were 
$2,300,000. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
continued coordination and evaluation of local erosion 
problems. 
42. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR 
Location. On Willow Creek immediately upstream from 
Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork 
and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 
26 East, Willamette Meridian. 
Existing project. Project provides flood protection to 
the city of Heppner and downstream area by controlling 
runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam is 
a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest 
elevation 2,130. Ancillary features include a center 
uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 
93,300 cfs (cubic feet per second), an outlet works with a 
capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. 
Gross storage capacity of the project is 13,250 acre-feet, 
consisting of 7,750 acre-feet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 
acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acrefeet 
exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage 
for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and 
aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities are being provided. 
Willow Creek Parks and Recreation District has leased 
recreation facilities at Willow Creek Lake. A courtesy 
handling dock was constructed by the Recreation District 
37-17

REPSOERTC ROEF TTAHREY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
utilizing Oregon State Marine Board funds.A playfield area 
below the dam has been leased to the City of Heppner. 
The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed 
with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 
20, 1979. The provisions of the Clear Water Act were met 
by a Section 404(bX1) Evaluation and a public notice issued 
January 12, 1980, and a section 401 certification from the 
State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is 
about 99 percent complete. 
Local cooperation. The Willow Creek Parks and 
Recreation District has withdrawn sponsorship. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine 
operation and maintenance performed. 
Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including 
Power 
43. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE 
BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA 
Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of 
Portland, OR, about 146 miles above mouth of river. For 
description of Columbia River, see Section 3. 
Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power 
and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel 
from Cascade island shore to Bradford Island. Overflow 
crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 
vertical-lift steel gates, 10 with remote control hoists placed 
between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a 
service roadway provides access, and two 350-ton gantry 
cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse No. 1 extending 
across Bradford Slough to the Oregon shore has an 
installation of 10 units, consisting of one unit of 48,000 
kilowatts, one unit of 59,500 kilowatts, and eight units of 
60,000 kilowatts each, totaling 587,500 kilowatts. Ordinary 
and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are 
about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish 
ladders to serve both main channel, Bradford Slough 
Channel, and Powerhouse II channel. Navigation lock and 
powerhouses are founded on andesite, and main dam rests 
on solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. The pool 
created by dam provides a navigable channel 27 feet deep 
between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 
river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock, 
spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 37-N. 
Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating 
installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds 
cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation 
facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 
for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildings 
and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, 
cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake 
facilities. 
In response to flow regulations and peakings from 
upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian 
storage and Pacific Northwest-Southwest Intertie, two 
modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. 
The modification for peaking project was undertaken to 
minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly 
changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project 
was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second 
modification provided for increased power installation by 
building a second powerhouse located on the Washington 
shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new 
powerhouse contains eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each 
and two fish attraction turbine generator units of 13,100 
kilowatts each for a combined capacity of 558,200 kilowatts, 
bringing the entire Bonneville capacity to 1,145.7 
megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the 
powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the 
Washington shore, transportation channel connecting the 
Cascade Island fish ladder with new exit control section, 
and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens 
in both the powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated 
increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. 
Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 
1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to 
North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested 
construction of a second powerhouse. 
Construction of project started October 1933, was 
completed February 1943. Modification of powerhouse 
control equipment started March 1957, was completed 
September 1958. First two power units were placed in 
operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with 
complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 
1943. 
Construction of modification for peaking work 
commenced in September 1970 and was completed in 
September 1978. 
Construction of second powerhouse is near completion. 
Final environmental impact statement was filed with 
Council on Environmental Quality in April 1972. In 
response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 
a year at the dam site itself and 2,700,000 project wide, a 
visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-seat 
theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Units 
11 through 18 were on-line by October, 1982. The visitor 
facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require 
cost-sharing) is an integral part of tbat structure. The total 
cost for construction of the second powerhouse is estimated 
at $678,714,000. 
In June 1993 work began on the rehabilitation of the 
First Powerhouse. In the first phase the existing circuit 
breakers and ten transformers will be replaced and the 
switchyard will be rehabilitated. Circuit breaker work was 
completed in 1995. The remaining work is scheduled for 
completion in 1996. Phase I will cost an estimated 
$27,100,000. The second phase consists of replacing the 
windings of five generators and replacing ten turbines. 
Second phase work was contracted in 1994 and is scheduled 
to be completed in 2002. Phase II will cost an estimated 
$84,300,000. 
The first powerhouse, spillway, navigation lock and 
associated facilities have been designated as a National 
Historic District. 
37-18 
REPORT OF THE SECRETARY FY 1995

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
A cost sharing agreement between the Corps and 
Skamania County has been finalized. Development of 
recreation facilities at Home Valley was completed in FY 
1989. 
Through September 1995, power generation totaled 
233.8 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale 
of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $608.2 
million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover 
Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 
Local cooperation. None required, except for nonfederal 
cost-sharing for development of recreational 
facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work 
continued for purchase of a crane to handle trash. On May 
25, 1995, the Hamilton Island disposal site was removed 
from EPA's National Priorities List, with no clean-up action 
necessary. Real estate actions regarding highway, railroad, 
and City of North Bonneville relocations continued. 
Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance 
the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. 
Routine operation and maintenance was performed with 
enhanced maintenance on the turbines. During the fiscal 
year 4,874,196,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy 
were generated, of which 4,840,208,000 kilowatt-hours were 
delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the 
marketing agency. 
44. COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, 
OR AND WA 
Location. At Bonneville, The Dalles, and John Day 
Dams on the Columbia River in the states of Oregon and 
Washington. This project encompasses work at five other 
locations within Walla Walla District. 
Existing project. The eight Corps hydroelectric projects 
on the lower Columbia and Snake Rivers have been 
identified as a major contributing factor in causing mortality 
to migrating salmon and steelhead. Without adequate 
bypass facilities to guide juvenile fish away from the power 
turbines at the dams, mortalities incurred through project 
passage severely impact the commercial, recreational, and 
Indian fisheries. The Corps has recognized the need to 
reduce juvenile mortality and has undertaken bypass 
measures that include mechanized fish bypass systems with 
barge and truck transportation. Spill as an additional 
bypass route over the spillways has been used to divert 
fish from entering turbine units, but it is a significant 
adverse economic factor due to lost power revenues. 
Congress passed and the President signed the FY 1989 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (PL 
100-371) which mandated the expenditure of funds for the 
design, testing, and construction of new or improved fish 
bypass facilities for the Columbia River Juvenile Fish 
Mitigation projects. Completion of the bypass and 
transportation facilities will significantly increase the 
survival of migrating downstream juvenile fish. The 
mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the 
juvenile and adult fish bypass facilities for these Columbia 
and Snake River dams. 
The plan of improvement within Portland District 
includes the following: (a) Bonneville - new juvenile fish 
monitoring facilities, and outfall relocation; (b) The Dalles 
- submerged extended fish screens and bypass system, new 
gantry crane and maintenance facility; (c) John Day - new 
juvenile fish monitoring facility, and planning and design 
for potential drawdown of the reservoir to minimum 
operating pool; (d) a mitigation study that analyzes longterm 
alternatives including surface bypass technology, gas 
abatement and improved turbine passage to improve fish 
passage and survival through Corps dams on the Columbia 
and Snake Rivers. 
The current fully funded total estimated Federal project 
cost is $1,386,000,000 which includes $820,800,000 for 
improvements in Walla Walla District, $561,417,000 in 
Portland District and $3,783,000 provided by the Bonneville 
Power Administration for design of the Bonneville juvenile 
fish monitoring facility. For information on the planned 
improvements in the upper Columbia and Snake Rivers, 
see Walla Walla District's Annual Report. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Bonneville 
- design of the juvenile fish monitoring facilities continued 
using funds provided by the Bonneville Power 
Administration; The Dalles - design of the juvenile bypass 
system and testing of the prototype submerged extended 
fish screen continued; John Day - planning and design 
continued for the potential drawdown of the reservoir to 
minimum operating pool (elevation 257 msl) and design of 
the new fish monitoring facility continued; Mitigation 
Studies - continued studies on improvements to existing 
bypass systems at the three lower Columbia projects. 
45. COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING 
ACCESS SITES, OR & WA 
Location. This project provides for construction on four 
sites along the Columbia River on Bonneville pool. 
Existing project. Congress has provided authority 
through public law to implement a wide range of land 
management, transfer, acquisition and development actions 
to provide fishing access for Indian tribes who exercise 
treaty fishing rights on the Columbia River. The law 
designates certain federal sites on Bonneville pool for fishing 
access. The improvements required at the access sites are 
specified in the authorizing legislation. They will include 
all weather access roads, camping facilities, boat ramps, 
docks, sanitation, and fish cleaning facilities. Construction 
of these facilities will greatly improve access to the 
Bonneville pool, the pool most heavily used for treaty fishing 
by the four tribes. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work 
began on construction of the first four sites. The Phase II 
Evaluation Report was completed and is under review. 
37-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
46. COUGAR LAKE, OR 
Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River 
which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its 
confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles 
east of Eugene, OR. 
Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious 
earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high 
above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage 
capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff 
of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is 
on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left 
abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and 
stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt 
units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit 
of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. 
Improvement functions as a unit in coordinated system of 
reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water 
resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities 
are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized 
(but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, 
below Cougar Lake, which would permit Cougar to operate 
as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain 
two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. 
Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, 
excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for 
which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and 
specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) 
have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed 
in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, 
respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was 
November 29, 1963. Through September 1995 power 
generation totaled 4.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross 
income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power 
Administration, $24,261,910 was reimbursed to the U.S. 
Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment 
and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of Strube Lake 
and Cougar Additional Unit is $114,000,000. 
The EIS for the addition of water temperature control to 
the intake tower is out for public review. Water temperature 
control will enhance fish passage and incubation in the 
McKenzie River. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine 
operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 
159,051,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were 
generated at project, of which 158,236,000 kilowatt-hours 
were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the 
marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on 
South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 37-M. 
47. DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR 
Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles 
from mouth 40 miles southeast of Salem, OR. North 
Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites 
with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 
10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles 
above its mouth. 
Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, 
both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a 
concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 
feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to 
roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, 
and outlet works are gate-controlled conduits through dam. 
Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 
kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. 
Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acrefeet 
and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 
square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated 
reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, 
to increase low water flows in interest of navigation and 
irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. 
Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is 
concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point 
of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power 
installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 
kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acrefeet 
at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for 
flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. 
Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, 
Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. 
Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed 
December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were 
placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At 
Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed 
on-line June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating 
fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 
1953. Through September 1995 power generation totaled 
20.3 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale 
of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, 
$73,001,391 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover 
Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Performed coil repair on unit #2. Routine operation and 
maintenance continued. During fiscal year 546,635,000 
kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project 
of which 543,515,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to 
Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. 
Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North 
Santiam River are shown in Table 37-M. 
48. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR 
Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam 
River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles 
above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 
30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, OR. 
Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, 
both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is 
a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet 
high above the lowest point of the general foundation with 
a gate-controlled spillway Outlet works consist of two 
37-20

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. 
Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stillingbasin, 
consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 
kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool 
of 430;000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville 
Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above 
creek junction, forming a Y-shaped pool. Reservoir controls 
runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. 
Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam 
is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its 
confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its 
confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists 
of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet 
high from lowest point of the general foundation and a 
concrete gravity gate controlled spillway and stilling basin 
for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists 
of two units with capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake 
has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project 
functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for 
multiple-purpose development of water resources in 
Willamette River Basin. 
All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project 
initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was 
placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a 
unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the 
Willamette River Basin. First power-generation unit was 
placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. 
Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from 
Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power 
generation unit was placed on-line August 22, 1968 and 
second, September 6,1968. Through September 1995 power 
generation totaled 9.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross 
income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power 
Administration, $59,802,995 was reimbursed to the U.S. 
Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment 
and operating costs. 
Local cooperation. Future recreation development at 
Foster or Green Peter will require cost sharing. Recreation 
facilities at Foster Lake includes 4 parks and 2 parks at 
Green Peter Lake. Five of these parks were developed by 
the Corps and are operated by Linn county under lease 
agreement. One park is operated by the Corps. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine 
operation and maintenance continued. During the fiscal 
year 376,564,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were 
generated at project of which 374,227,000 kilowatt-hours 
were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the 
marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake 
project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 37-M. 
49. HILTS CREEK LAKE, OR 
Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 
miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout 
Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west 
slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its 
junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 
45 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. 
Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 
2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point 
of the general foundation.A gate-controlled concrete gravity 
chute-type spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, 
outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. 
Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next 
to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and 
provides storage capacity at full pool of 356,000 acre-feet. 
Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles 
and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for 
development of water resources ofWillamette River Basin. 
Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as 
a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle 
Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with 
Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control 
system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and 
provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric 
power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest 
Service. Hills Creek power units are remote controlled from 
Lookout Point. 
Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was 
completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for 
useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2,1962, the 
two power units were placed on-line. Through September 
1995, power generation totaled 5.1 billion kilowatt-hours. 
Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville 
Power Administration, $22,847,798 was reimbursed to the 
U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project 
investment and operating costs. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine 
operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 
155,063,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were 
generated at project, of which 154,574,000 kilowatt-hours 
were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the 
marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake 
on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 
50. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM -LAKE 
UMATILLA, OR AND WA 
Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream 
from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above 
mouth of Columbia River. 
Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, 
fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water 
lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and 
Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, 
and communities affected by the impoundment. The project 
as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 
acre-feet of flood control storage. As modified, the project 
provides 500,000 acre-feet of flood control storage between 
elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length 
and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse 
has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 
16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 
2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in 
Table 37-N. 
37-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
A detailed description of project as authorized and 
modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 
1962 under the Walla Walla District. 
Construction began July 1958 and the project was opened 
to navigation April 1968.The main dam contract is complete. 
Lock rehabilitation work begun in FY 1980 was completed 
in FY 1986. Entire project is estimated to be 99 percent 
complete. Through September 1995 power generation 
totaled 276.8 billion kilowatt-hour. Of the gross income from 
sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, 
$415,988,661 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to 
recover Corps of Engineers project investment and 
operating costs. 
Local cooperation. Recreation facilities at 5 parks are 
operated and maintained by local agencies under lease 
agreement with the Corps. Six developed recreation areas 
are operated and maintained by the Corps of Engineers. 
Any future recreation development will require cost sharing. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work 
continued on modifications to the fish bypass system. 
Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance 
the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. 
Routine operation and maintenance continued. During 
fiscal year 10,421,393,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power 
were generated by the 16 generating units of which 
10,402,000,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville 
Power Administration, the marketing agency. 
Rehabilitation: Final major contract for rewinding of 5 
generators continued and is scheduled for FY 1996 
completion. 
51. LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, 
OR
Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian 
site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, 
rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range 
and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, 
which is head of mainstem Willamette River. Dam is about 
22 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. 
Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a 
reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both 
dams are earth-and-gravel-fills with concrete spillways and 
have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high 
from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 
3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long 
providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. 
Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 
square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled 
overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works 
consisting of slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through 
spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating 
units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Dexter 
reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above 
lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long 
at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending 
upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate 
Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform 
discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow 
section 509 feet long forming right abutment. 
Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates 
and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 
15,000-kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are 
operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of 
reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, 
to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low 
water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. 
Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan 
for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River 
Basin. 
Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed 
June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation 
facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Future 
recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the 
cost-sharing contract with Lane County and will require a 
50 percent contribution by Lane County and is subject to 
funding availability by the Government and the County. 
At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1,2, and 3 
were placed in commercial operation December 1954, 
February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter 
powerhouse the single unit was placed on-line May 1955. 
Dexter was placed in operation for reregulation in December 
1954. Through September 1995 power generation totaled 
16.2 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale 
of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, 
$80,602,891 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover 
Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 
Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing 
agreement has been in force with Lane County since 
September 1976. It includes 4 projects and 13 parks. All 
these parks are managed by Lane County under lease 
agreement. Recreation opportunities are provided at 2 parks 
on Dexter Lake which are operated by Lane County via 
the multi-project cost-sharing agreement and lease 
instruments. The north shore of Lookout Point Lake is also 
leased to Lane County for recreation purposes; there is 
essentially no development. Future development will 
require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Contract work continued to supply new generator windings 
for Lookout Point and Dexter. Routine operation and 
maintenance continued. During fiscal year 397,637,000 
kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated 
at project of which 395,812,000 kilowatt-hours were 
delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the 
marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point 
Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown 
in Table 37-M. 
52. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER 
BASIN, OR 
Location. On Upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 
30 miles northeasterly from Medford, OR. 
Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment 
dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an 
overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core 
37-22

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
and a gate-controlled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on 
right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with 
installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating 
outlet facility was provisions for temperature regulation 
for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on 
right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acrefeet 
of usable storage. Project provides control of runoff of 
drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to 
hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood 
control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) 
water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality 
control and recreation benefits. 
Construction of project initiated July 1967 is complete. 
Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial 
operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical 
in-service date for flood control was February 18,1977. Final 
environmental statement was filed with Council on 
Environmental Quality in June 1972. Recreation 
opportunities are provided by 4 parks at the project. The 
State of Oregon operates 2 parks, including a 200 unit 
campground, part of Stewart State Park. Through 
September 1995, power generation totaled 5.0 billion 
kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power 
by Bonneville Power Administration, $31,077,158 was 
reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of 
Engineers project investment and operating costs. 
Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local 
agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that 
demands will be made for future use of water supply storage 
within a period that will permit repayment of costs, 
including interest, allocated to water supply within life of 
the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to 
construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to 
be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to 
irrigation would have to be repaid in manner and to an 
extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and 
costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by 
revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal 
system by Bonneville Power Administration. A survey in 
September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine 
communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I 
supply has been completed with one of the communities. 
Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were 
obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On 
February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and 
Wildlife agreed to operate Cole M. Rivers Fish Hatchery 
for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The Corps provides 
full funding for the operation and maintenance of the 
hatchery. The hatchery became operational in 1972. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine 
operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 
275,602,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were 
generated by the project of which 272,389,000 kilowatthours 
were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, 
the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek 
Lake on Rogue River are shown in Table 37-M. 
53. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM -LAKE 
CELILO, WA AND OR 
Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind 
Bonneville Dam, about 192 miles above mouth of river and 
88 miles east of Portland, OR. 
Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, 
and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for 
navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is 
designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean 
sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream 
about 23 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. 
The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, 
gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore 
connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins 
powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting 
spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock 
at right abutment on Washington shore. Fish-passing 
facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. 
Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units initially with 
substructure for eight additional units, an ultimate total of 
22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt 
fish-water units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. With eight units 
installed for a capacity of 687,800 kilowatts. The total 
generating capacity is 1,806,800 kilowatts. Structures are 
founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data 
concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in 
Table 37-N. 
Major construction of project initiated February 1952, 
was completed October 1960 when unit No.14 was placed 
in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 
15-22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit 
phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in 
commercial operation in November 1973. Basic recreation 
facilities were developed with construction funds at 4 parks 
on Lake Cello. These parks were further expanded with 
code 710 funds in the late 60's and early 70's. Two parks 
are operated by Washington State Park Commission under 
a lease agreement. Studies for adding power generation 
facilities to the North Shore Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water 
supply System were initiated in October 1979 and 
completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide 
baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact 
the present operation of the North Fish Ladder. However, 
it was determined that it was not within the Chief of 
Engineer's authority to add these power facilities. A local 
interest, North Wasco County Public Utility District 
pursued the construction of these power facilities through 
the FERC license processes and awarded a construction 
contract in September 1989. Seufert Visitor Center was 
completed in September 1980. Through September 1995, 
power generation totaled 269.0 billion kilowatt-hours. Of 
the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville 
Power Administration, $383,771,398 was reimbursed to the 
U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project 
investment and operating costs. 
Local cooperation. Further recreation development 
will require cost sharing and assumption of operation and 
maintenance by local, non-federal sponsor. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous 
fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Studies to 
rehabilitate the fishwater generators and generating units 
37-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
1-14 are continuing. Three major unit overhauls were 
completed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 
During fiscal year 5,939,647,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical 
power energy were generated at project of which 
5,922,683,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville 
Power Administration, the marketing agency. 
General Investigations 
54. SURVEYS 
Fiscal year costs were $1,687,089 of which $440,927 was 
for navigation studies, $780,696 for flood damage prevention 
studies, $14,199 for Environmental Services Partnerships, 
$348,800 for miscellaneous activities, $6,063 for Review of 
Authorized Projects, and $96,404 for coordination with other 
agencies. Contributed funds in the amount of $296,929 were 
expended of which $248,842 was contributed by the 
Association of Lower Columbia River Ports for the Columbia 
River Channel Deepening Study. 
55. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC 
DATA 
Flood plain management services. Flood Plain 
Management Services Program comes under Section 206 
of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. 
Through technical services and planning guidance, the 
program encourages comprehensive flood plain 
management planning at all levels to reduce the potential 
for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non- 
Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with 
planning and development information for flood hazard 
areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain 
regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and 
Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may 
include factual flood information (available or determined) 
and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, 
flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. 
Fiscal year costs totaling $137,431 were associated with 
the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management 
Services Program: FPMS Unit $27,694; Technical Services 
$33,314; Quick Responses $5,256; and special studies 
$71,167. Contributed funds in the amount of $2,499 were 
expended for Flood Plain Management Services and $45,588 
for special studies. 
56. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 
AND DESIGN 
Columbia River Treaty Fishing Access 
Sites, OR and WA 
The authorized plan includes land management, 
acquisition, and river access facility development for Indian 
tribes who exercise treaty fishing rights on the Columbia 
River, Oregon and Washington. Public Law 100-581 Title 
IV designates 21 sites on Bonneville, The Dalles, and John 
Day pools for treaty fishing use and authorizes the 
acquisition of 6 additional sites on Bonneville pool from 
willing sellers. The law specifies the construction of access 
roads, boat ramps, dock sanitation, fish cleaning facilities, 
and others at these locations and provides additional 
authority for facility improvements at five sites currently 
administered for treaty fishing access resulting from 
construction of Bonneville Dam. 
Plans and specifications for Phase I which consists of 
four early action sites on Bonneville pool and of the Phase 
II Evaluation Report were completed. Fiscal year 
expenditures were $62,856. 
Coos Bay, OR (Deep Draft Navigation) 
The feasibility report was completed and submitted to 
Congress in August 1994. The report recommended 
deepening the bar and the existing 15-mile channel by two 
feet to 47 and 37 feet, respectively. The construction cost 
estimate for this project is $11.9 million including $183,000 
for local interests to dredge berthing areas and dock 
rehabilitation. The estimated average annual costs and 
benefits are $1.1 and $1.9 million, respectively. The benefitto-
cost ratio is 1.6 to 1. Project cost sharing will include 
requirements for non-federal interests to pay 25 percent of 
the project cost during construction, and an additional 10 
percent to be repaid over a period not exceeding 30 years. 
Fiscal year work consisted of completion of the Feasibility 
Study Phase. Preparation of plans and specifications 
continued. Fiscal year expeneditures were $259,916. 
Willamette River Temperature Control, OR 
The project plan consists of improving downstream water 
temperatures by modifying the existing intake towers at 
Cougar and Blue River projects. Restoring pre-project 
temperatures will improve survival rates and increase 
populations of three important native fish species: the wild 
stock of Willamette spring chinook salmon, the bull trout, 
and the rainbow trout. These fisheries once provided 
important recreational and commercial benefits to the 
region. Preconstruction engineering and design is estimated 
to cost $2,750,000 and be completed by March 1998. The 
construction phase is estimated to cost approximately $45 
million. 
Fiscal year work consisted of initiation of a Feature 
Design Memorandum and a Value Engineering Study. 
Fiscal year expenditures were $212,188. 
37-24

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section. Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 to 
In Text Sep.30, 1995 
1. Bonneville Navigation 
Lock, Bonneville Dam, 
OR and WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Inland Waterway 
Trust Fund) 
2. Chetco River, OR 
3. Columbia and Lower 
Willamette Rivers 
Below Vancouver, 
WA and Portland, OR 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
4. Columbia River at 
Baker Bay, WA 
5. Columbia River 
Between Chinook, 
WA, and Head of 
Sand Island 
6. Columbia River at 
The Mouth, OR and 
WA 
7. Columbia River 
Between Vancouver,WA 
and The Dalles, OR 
8. Columbia River, 
Seafarers Memorial, 
Hammond, OR 
9. Columbia River, 
Vancouver Deep Draft 
Anchorage, WA 
(Contributed Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contrib. 
Cost 
32,440,000 18,889,000 
32,423,462 18,900,338 
32,440,000 18,889,000 
32,417,676 18,960,239 
5,021,000 1,605,000 
4,789,539 1,945,123 
5,021,000 1,605,000 
4,737,777 1,945,123 
342,000 340,000 801,000 385,000 
341,065 328,748 249,262 833,173 
10,887,000 11,899,000 10,993,000 10,691,000 
10,888,793 11,741,316 10,350,493 11,475,425 
16,000 31,000 
16,528 28,034 
256,000 
258,564 
641,000 -27,000 
632,010 -13,912 
4,000 31,000 774,000 
723 10,402 638,715 
174,904,307 50so 
174,671,053 50 
174,904,000 
174,776,466 
2,043,713 1 
2,043,713 1 
8,621,673 
8,505,835 
28,349,304 2 
28,349,304 2 
336,805,296 3 
336,771,698 3 
665,954 4 
665,954 4 
941,252 
941,252 
4,636,087 
4,635,739 
220,283 5 
220,283 s 
6,725,877 
6,566,701 
24,913,661 6 
24,913,661 6 
7,774,000 5,331,186 6,576,000 4,760,000 143,984,835 ' 
7,761,894 5,343,357 6,397,432 4,852,373 143,845,501 ' 
7,322,878 
7,322,878 
5,989,509 8 
5,989,509 8 
208,000 111,000 95,000 207,000 
206,931 94,447 88,958 236,752 
16,000 
15,798 
8,800 
72,848 
84,000 
168,600 
126 166,284 
90,000 
477 
28,000 
17,050 
6,000 
31,248 
13,365,359 9 
13,361,410 9 
150,000 
52,024 
337,000 
323,569 
96,000 
31,725 
37-25

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 37-A 
(CONTINUED) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 to 
In Text Sep.30, 1995 
10. Coos Bay, OR 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
11. Coquille River, OR 
12. Depoe Bay, OR 
14. Port Orford, OR 
16. Rogue River Harbor 
At Gold Beach, OR 
17. Siuslaw River, OR 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
18. Skipanon Channel, OR 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
29,750,092 1to 
29,750,092 1o 
3,595,000 3,814,000 3,095,000 4,426,000 100,178,718 11 
3,630,859 3,660,691 3,215,052 4,403,212 100,070,077 11 
2,335,966 
2,335,966 
486,680 
486,680 
693,366 12 
693,366 12 
638,000 335,000 515,000 223,000 
636,419 339,017 499,311 230,600 
7,000 98,000 629,000 
5,418 77,423 630,082 
-12,000 
6,611 
290,000 408,000 359,000 342,000 
281,764 397,748 265,572 450,372 
944,000 994,000 1,069,000 1,032,000 
929,545 1,005,977 1,063,197 1,031,808 
781,000 763,000 772,000 427,000 
789,737 732,768 752,569 468,581 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
8,120,987 13 
8,112,898 13 
367,364 
367,364 
1,669,717 
1,663,698 
758,692 14 
758,692 14 
4,999,217 
4,992,382 
4,156,252 15 
4,156,252 15 
16,222,394 16 
16,211,326 16 
635,783 
635,783 
29,502,212 17 
29,502,212 17 
16,099,384 18is 
16,089,351 18 
879,285 
879,285 
493,611 
493,611 
280,854 
280,854 
37-26

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
TABLE 37-A 
(CONTINUED) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 to 
In T'xt Sep.30, 1995 
19. Tillamook Bay and 
Bar, OR 
20. Umpqua River, OR 
21. Umpqua River, 
Winchester Bay, OR 
22. Westport, OR - Puget 
Island, WA 
(Contributed Funds) 
23. Willamette River at 
Willamette Falls, OR 
24. Yaquina Bay and 
Harbor, OR 
25. Yaquina River, OR 
26. 7.5 MCY Standby Time 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Minor Rehab 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
19,000 
21,311 1,191 
117,000 
524 116,756 
-45,000 8,000 30,000 
15,405 18,627 30,812 
8,000 
6,716 
869,000 1,180,000 1,070,000 1,110,000 
874,091 1,160,367 1,008,564 1,190,934 
39,200 89,000 468,600 
34,870 91,124 470,806 
5,000 40,400 162,200 
4,382 14,487 168,130 
23,800 
17,728 
-6,000 
13,194 
1,466 
664,000 734,000 1,247,000 760,000 
684,759 710,047 1,253,840 745,193 
3,622,064 
3,619,527 
22,434,827 19 
22,434,827 19 
6,764,082 20 
6,762,661 20 
2,839,799 
2,839,799 
17,718,877 21 
17,718,877 21 
31,131,093 
31,127,288 
2,500,677 
2,500,677 
644,300 
644,300 
254,046 
251,792 
23,800 
19,194 
520,005 22 
520,005 22 
21,073,818 23 
21,032,385 23 
234,794 
234,794 
19,242,046 2 
19,242,046 m 
1,603,000 2,126,000 1,477,000 1,634,000 37,728,758 " 
1,602,679 2,038,446 1,495,491 1,652,656 37,676,102 2 
12,005 
12,005 
28,800 
28,800 
30,000 548,000 
22,856 545,822 
1,154,000 3,160,000 
4,313,741 
1,327,694 51 
1,318,372 51 
4,314,000 
4,313,741 
37-27

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 37-A 
(CONTINUED) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 to 
In Text Sep.30, 1995 
27. Applegate Lake, 
Rogue River Basin 
OR 
28. Blue River Lake, OR 
29. Cottage Grove Lake, 
OR 
30. Dorena Lake, OR 
31. Elk Creek Lake, 
Rogue River Basin, 
OR 
32. Fall Creek Lake, OR 
33. Fern Ridge Lake, OR 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
36. Lower Columbia River 
Basin Bank Protection 
OR & WA 
37. Mt. St. Helens 
Sediment Control, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
519,000 556,000 563,000 613,000 
511,520 546,733 570,193 605,587 
182,000 238,000 334,000 200,000 
178,433 230,545 336,866 201,904 
434,000 598,000 666,000 718,000 
487,367 585,253 681,923 723,951 
411,000 522,000 476,000 433,000 
418,433 543,752 471,695 432,081 
91,642,489 
91,642,489 
7,335,115 48 
7,311,312 48 
32,038,225 26 
32,038,225 26 
3,742,299 
3,726,653 
4,013,123 27 
4,013,123 27 
13,942,288 28 
13,926,821 28 
14,568,262 2 
14,568,262 29 
8,988,460 
8,954,261 
1,110,000 550,000 2,985,000 421,000 107,850,579 
1,226,541 747,616 533,812 769,155 105,696,063 
22,118,264 o 
22,118,264 so0 
616,000 522,000 581,000 467,000 
663,086 527,537 554,509 499,144 
6,000 156,900 -65,200 
4,823 149,437 -56,400 
912,000 840,000 961,000 946,000 
919,406 827,935 982,043 937,460 
75,000 -22,334 
52,666 
23,000 62,000 
45,084 18,536 11,442 
-35,000 
8,370 
8,276,671 
8,264,331 
8,685,635 31 
8,685,635 31 
19,126,198 32 
19,103,223 32 
52,666 
52,666 
21,032,745 
21,016,813 
-50,000 111,669,000 
536,658 115,463 -8,519 3,820 111,659,458 
53,872 
53,872 
396,000 305,000 372,000 343,000 
389,294 311,716 347,114 355,445 
3,703,112 
3,703,112 
1,805,000 
1,787,506 
37-28

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
TABLE 37-A 
(CONTINUED) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 to 
In Text Sep.30, 1995 
38. Mt. St. Helens and 
Vicinity, WA 
39. Rogue River 
Grants Pass, OR 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contributed Funds) 
41. Willamette River 
Basin Bank Protection, 
OR 
42. Willow Creek Lake, OR 
43. Bonneville Lock and 
Dam - Lake Bonneville 
OR and WA 
44. Columbia River 
Fish Mitigation, 
OR and WA 
45. Columbia River Treaty Fishing 
Access Sites, OR & WA 
46. Cougar Lake, OR 
47. Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, 
OR 
48. Green Peter-Foster 
Lakes, OR 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Minor Rehab 
Approp 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
-62,000 
7,500 
-60,000 
950 
3,000 37,000 90,600 
578 33,207 96,227 
30,200 
18,176 
10,000 
4,575 4,939 
12,000 
9,041 
56,000 93,000 40,000 45,000 
61,566 77,043 51,750 45,355 
25,000 37,000 
40,420 37,248 
420,000 409,000 
412,532 401,943 
2,716,000 4,693,000 
2,888,142 3,644,484 
463,000 462,000 
450,911 490,266 
4,701,000 3,459,000 
5,654,549 3,487,431 
13,393,000 14,277,000 15,798,000 17,480,000 
13,161,143 14,162,891 15,819,748 17,469,742 
1,290,000 5,875,000 14,487,000 
784,239 2,565,983 17,369,493 
3,804,000 6,700,000 7,200,000 20,003,000 
3,434,045 6,514,078 5,468,865 20,986,593 
3,360,000 -593,000 
21,608 686,392 
920,000 1,042,000 1,351,900 1,255,000 
989,556 1,017,213 1,366,112 1,267,831 
1,699,000 1,875,000 1,885,900 1,873,000 
1,811,308 1,831,455 1,896,191 1,900,949 
42,036,000 
42,036,000 
130,600 
130,012 
30,200 
18,176 
24,865,816 33 
24,862,371 3 
4,100,709 
4,087,257 
37,260,114 
37,260,114 
5,233,051 
5,221,187 
788,991,604 34 
788,603,942 " 
248,454,663 35 
247,876,265 35 
21,652,000 
20,719,715 
39,050,000 
37,517,756 
2,767,000 
708,000 
58,636,393 36 
58,636,393 36 
18,550,196 *4 
18,517,294 49 
62,729,698 
62,729,698 
38,873,607 47 
38,838,142 47 
363,086 
363,086 
84,005,788 37 
84,005,788 37 
37-29

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 37-A 
(CONTINUED) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total Cost 
Section Project Funding FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 to 
In Text Sep.30, 1995 
49. Hills Creek Lake, OR 
50. John Day Lock and 
Dam - Lake Umatilla, 
OR and WA 
Major Rehab. 
51. Lookout Point - Dexter 
Lakes, OR 
52. Lost Creek Lake, 
Rogue River 
Basin, OR 
53. The Dalles Lock and 
Dam - Lake Celilo, 
WA and OR 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
1,981,000 2,270,000 2,633,900 2,414,000 
2,038,785 2,232,324 2,464,234 2,595,529 
601,000 739,000 819,000 657,000 
606,010 737,248 783,167 698,043 
51,754 3,731 7,913 159 
10,719,000 11,022,000 14,008,000 13,087,000 
10,906,494 10,674,129 13,986,274 13,007,116 
2,134,000 2,535,000 6,100,000 2,840,000 
2,073,299 2,574,972 5,514,311 3,417,551 
3,265,000 3,566,000 6,670,900 4,062,000 
3,399,006 3,518,176 4,296,520 6,457,631 
3,149,000 3,296,000 3,817,900 3,730,000 
3,114,685 3,230,620 3,779,970 3,831,988 
9,700,000 9,856,000 11,771,000 11,769,000 
10,024,491 9,478,630 11,975,161 11,824,943 
38,924,703 38 
38,888,072 38 
45,700,619 
45,700,619 
12,757,375 3 
12,750,554 39 
512,400,246 o40 
512,400,246 40 
183,739,727 41 
183,058,013 41 
39,880,128 
39,839,566 
88,238,395 42 
88,238,395 42 
65,863,532 43 
65,766,265 43 
136,408,150 
136,408,150 
44,620,618 " 
44,574,636 " 
303,260,288 '4 
303,260,288 45 
164,915,670 46 
164,590,397 46 
1. Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 
2. Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. 
3. Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance 
funds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated program 
repair, and $1,214,865 for previous project.Excludes $24,320 
expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. 
4. Excludes $31,636 contributed by city of Astoria and Bumble 
Bee Sea Foods, Astoria, OR (not part of regular project). Includes 
$223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and 
$428,136 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,792 by Port of 
Vancouver. 
5. Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. 
6. Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $608,111 allotted 
and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed 
project. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 
7. Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under 
deferred maintenance, Code 700. 
8. Includes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) 
$30,393. Entrance to Oregon slough; $161,897, Camas-Washougal 
Turning Basin; $227,908, Hood River Small Boat Basin; $157,470, 
Bingen, WA, Barge Channel; and $140,619, The Dalles Small Boat 
Basin. 
9. Includes $2,033,408 under code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 
10. Includes $802,096 for previous project, Excludes contributed 
funds. 
11.Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under 
Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed 
funds. 
12. Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72,891 
contributed funds. includes $36,000 under Code 711. 
13. Includes $41,467 for previous project and $78,500 under Code 
700, Deferred Maintenance. 
14. Excludes $9,900 contributed funds. 
15. Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional 
landfill and extension of drainage lines. 
16. Includes $21,000, Wedderburn Study Funds. 
37-30 
I

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
17. Includes $1,159,357 for previous project. 
18. Includes $10,611 for previous project and $188,000 under code 
700, Deferred Maintenance. 
19. Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 
720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes 
$592,622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local 
interest. 
20. Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 
expended from contributed funds. 
21. Includes $39,242 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 
expended from contributed funds. 
22. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 
23. Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent 
indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and 
operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 
24. Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 
appropriated from public works acceleration program for north 
jetty rehabilitation. 
25. Includes $6,026 for previous project. 
26. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of 
Quartz Creek Lake. 
27. Includes $1,639,828 allotted and expended under Code 710, 
recreation facilities at completed project. 
28. Includes $167,878 special recreation use fees. Includes $66,678 
under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements 
to navigable waters. 
29. Includes $1,038,790 allotted and expended under Code 710, 
recreation facilities at completed project. 
30. Includes $1,026,264 allotted and expended under Code 710, 
recreation facilities at completed project. 
31. Includes $3,894,673 allotted and expended under Code 710, 
recreation facilities at completed project and $136,482 allotted 
under 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. 
Excludes $2,100 (other funds contributed). 
32. Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. 
Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and 
other improvements to navigable waters. 
33. Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 
34. Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, 
$20,240,700 National Recover Act Funds, $27,195,400 modification 
for peaking funds, $136,457 Code 710, recreation facilities at 
completed project funds and $627,593,352 allotted and 
$642,322,501 expended second powerhouse funds, $6,000 allotted, 
$6,000 expended power units funds. 
35. Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and 
$1,692,148 maintenance and operation of dams and other 
improvements of navigable waters. 
36. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of 
Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,789,988 allotted and $1,789,954 
expended for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 
37. Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu 
of Quartz Creek Lake. 
38. Includes $978,678 under maintenance and operation of dams 
and other improvements of navigable waters. 
39. Includes $75,400 under maintenance and operation of dams 
and other improvements of navigable waters. 
40. Includes $25,984 allotted and expended under 710, recreation 
facilities at completed projects. 
41. Includes $1,361,900 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring 
Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, 
but a cost to project); includes $423,800 special recreation use fees. 
Includes $933,438 under maintenance and operation of dams and 
other improvements of navigable waters. 
42. Includes $457,611 allotted and expended under 710, recreation 
facilities at completed projects. 
43. Includes $983,678 under maintenance and operation of dams 
and other improvements of navigable waters. 
44. Includes $978,478 under maintenance and operation of dams 
and other improvements of navigable waters. 
45. Includes $1,140,747 allotted and expended under 710, 
recreation facilities at completed projects, and $52,997,220 allotted 
and expended additional units 15 - 22 funds. 
46. Includes $721,490 under maintenance and operation of dams 
and other improvements of navigable waters. 
47. Includes $927,178 under maintenance and operation of dams 
and other improvements of navigable waters. 
48. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams 
and other improvements of navigable waters. 
49. Includes $851,778 under maintenance and operation of dams 
and other improvements of navigable waters. 
50. Includes $24,307 under code 422 General Investigation. 
51. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 
37-31

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Date 
Authorizing 
Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Aug 15, 1985 
Nov 17, 1986 
Mar 02, 1945 
Oct 27, 1965 
Dec 04, 1981 
Oct 31, 1992 
3. 
Feb 27, 1911 
Jul 25, 1912 
Jul 27, 1916 
Aug 08, 1917 
Sep 22, 1922 
Mar 04, 19232 
Mar 03, 1925 
Mar 03, 1927 
Jul 03, 1930 
Sep 06, 19333 
Aug 30, 1935 
Aug 30, 1935 
Aug 30, 1935 
Aug 26, 1937 
Aug 26, 1937 
Mar 02, 1945 
Mar 02, 1945 
Jul 24, 1946 
Oct 23, 1962 
Oct 23, 1962 
1. 
37-32 
See 
Section 
in Text 
2. 
BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA 
Construction of a new navigation lock just south P.L. 99-88 
of existing lock. 
Construction to be funded 50% from fuel taxes paid P.L. 99-662 
into Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 
CHETCO RIVER, OR 
To provide for the stabilization of the channel, by H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., 2d Sess 
constructing jetties and dredging. 
Modification of channel entrance and channel S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 
improvements. 
Deepen channel 2 feet to 16 feet, extend the existing jetty S. Doc. 10, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. 
system 750 feet for the North, and 1,250 feet for the 
South jetty. 
Assume responsibility for O&M of the approximately P.L. 102-580, 102nd Cong. 
200-foot-long access channel to the south commercial 
boat basin consistent with authorized project depths. 
COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW 
VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR 
2 pipeline dredges and accessories. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' 
Increasing main channel to 30 feet. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' 
Consolidating improvement below Portland, OR and No Prior Report 
between Vancouver, WA and mouth of Willamette. 
For the Cathlamet channel. H. Doc. 120, 63d Cong., 1st Sess.' 
Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3d Sess. 
and accessories for better maintenance, and construct 
contraction works. 
Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep H. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. 
water in Columbia River. 
Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of H. Doc 126, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Willamette River to Vancouver, WA. 
Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River Rivers and Harbors 
on condition that main channel to be opened to project Committee Doc. 10 
dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland. 69th Cong., 2d Sess. 
For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to H. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., 
the sea. 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors 
Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 
1st Sess.1 
A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of H. Doc. 249, 72d Cong., 2d Sess.' 
Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, 
each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 
2,000 feet long. 
A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette Rivers and Harbors 
to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, Committee Doc. 1, 
30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
basins at Vancouver. 
Maintenance of not to exceed 35 foot depth at low water Rivers and Harbors 
in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its Committee Doc. 6, 
mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' 
Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 H. Doc. 235, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' 
feet at St. Helens. 
Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, WA, Rivers and Harbors 
1,000 feet downstream. Committee Doc. 81, 
74th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
along waterfront at Rainier, OR. 
Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. H. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., 1st. Sess.' 
An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, WA. H. Doc. 630. 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR. H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong.,2d Sess.' 
A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth H. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. 
of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at 
Vancouver, WA, with 2turning basins of same depth. 
A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, 
WA, to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at H. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
Vancouver, WA, a turning basin at Longview, WA, and a 
channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to 
Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area.

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
TABLE 37-B 
(CONTINUED) 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Dec 11, 1933 
Aug 30, 1935 
Mar 02, 1945 
May 17, 1950 
Jun 20, 1938 
Sep 03, 1954 
Mar 03, 1905 
Dec 22, 1944 
Sep 03, 1954 
Jul 30, 1983 
May 24, 1995 
Aug 26, 1937 
Mar 02, 1945 
Jul 24, 1946 
Jul 24, 1946 
Jul 24, 1946 
Jul 24, 1946 
Nov 5, 1990 
Oct 29, 1993 
Jun 25, 1910 
Mar 02, 1919 
Sep 22, 1922 
Jan 21, 1927 
Jul 03, 1930 
Aug 30, 1935 
Jul 24, 1946 
Jun 30, 1948 
COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA 
East Channel 
Main channel 
West channel 8 feet deep. 
West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with 
protecting breakwaters. 
Public Works Administration 
H. Doc. 44, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 
S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND 
Channel 8 feet deep. Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 50,75th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. S. Doc. 8, 83d Cong.,lst Sess.1 
COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA 
Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec. 4, Flood Control 
facilities. Act of 1944 as amended 
Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore.9 H. Doc. 249, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.1 
Deepening the northernmost 2,000 feet of the channel P.L. 98-63 
cross section to 55 feet. 
Lower a 500' section of south jetty at river mile 7. Sec. 1135 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986, 
as amended, P.L. 99-662 
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR 
Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from H. Committee Doc. 94, 
Vancouver, WA, to Bonneville, OR. 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. H. Doc. 218, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 
from Bonneville, OR, to The Dalles, OR. 
Construct a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 
500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. 
Construct a barge channel at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 
200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 
7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural 
mooring basin. 
Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide S. Doc. 89, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
by 800 feet long. 
COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OR 
Engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a P. L. 101-514; H. R. 101-889, 101st 
support structure to serve as the foundation for the Cong, 2d Sess. 
Seafarer's Memorial in the Columbia River, in cooperation 
with the City of Hammond, Oregon. 
COLUMBIA RIVER, VANCOUVER DEEP DRAFT ANCHORAGE, WA 
Construct Anchorage Sec. 107, Rivers and Harbors Act 
of 1960 
COOS BAY, OR 
Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel. 
A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill. 
Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South 
Jetty about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel 
from Smith's Mill to Millington. 
Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable 
within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 given 
in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. 
A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through 
Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly 
side of bay. 
For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to 
Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. 
Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to 
Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank 
Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at 
mile 3.5 and near mile 7. 
A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. 
H. Doc. 958, 60th Cong.,1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 325, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 110, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
S. Committee Print, 
73d Cong., 2d Sess.' 
S. Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc 646, 80th Cong.,2nd Sess. 
37-33 
4. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
9. 
10.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 37-B 
(CONTINUED) 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
11. 
Dec 31, 1970 
Jun 25, 1910 
Mar 02, 1919 
Jul 03, 1930 
Aug 30, 1935 
Dec 22, 1944 
Mar 02, 1945 
Aug 26, 1937 
Mar 2, 1945 
Oct 27, 1965 
Dec 31, 1970 
Oct 31, 1992 
Sep 03, 1954 
Sep 19, 1890 
Jun 25, 1910 
Mar 03, 1925 
Jul 03, 1958 
Oct 22, 1976 
Oct 01, 1980 
Jul 03, 1930 
Aug 26, 1937 
Jun 30, 1948 
Jul 26, 1912 
Mar 04, 1913 
Mar 02, 1919 
Mar 03, 1925 
Mar 02, 1945 
Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, 
inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and 
widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. 
COQUILLE RIVER, OR 
Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and 
removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork 
and Bandon. 
For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon. 
Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end 
of North Jetty. 
Present project depth between sea and eastern end of 
North Jetty. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of 
recreation facilities. 
For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1 mile above Coquille 
River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. 
DEPOE BAY, OR 
Construction of an inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide 
and 5 feet deep, with an entrance channel of same depth 
and 50 feet wide. 
Construction of an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide 
and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 
30 feet wide. 
PORT ORFORD, OR 
Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. 
Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet wide, 
16 feet deep. 
Maintain the authorized navigation channel including 
those portions of the channel within 50 feet of the 
port facility. 
ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR 
Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. 
SIUSLAW RIVER, OR 
Build two high-tide stone jetties. 
Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed 
under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot 
south jetty. 
12-foot deep channel. 
18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot 
extension of north Jetty. (600-foot extension classified 
deferred.) 
Phase I advance engineering and design for north 
and south jetty extensions. 
Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and 
2,500 feet, respectively. 
SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR 
Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad 
bridge, 30 feet deep. 
Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a 
distance of 4,500 feet. 
Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. 
TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR 
Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging 
channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. 
Abandon that portion of project above Bay City. 
Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension 
of channels and turning basins with regulating works 
as needed. 
Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula 
caused by storm Jan. 1939. 
37-34 
H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 207, 65th Cong.,lst Sess.' 
H. Doc. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 
S. Committee Print, 
74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Sec. 4, Food Control 
Act of 1944 as amended 
H. Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
H. Doc. 202, 75th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 350, 77th Cong. 
1st Sess. 
S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong.,2d Sess 
H. Doc 151, 91st Cong.,2d Sess. 
P.L. 102-580, 102nd Cong. 
S. Doc. 83, 83d Cong. 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 71, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 648, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. 
S. Committee Print, 
Serial, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong.,lst Sess.' 
Final Report of Chief 
of Engineers 
P.L. 96-367 
H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 
H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 
S. Doc. 93, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.1 
H. Doc. 349, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 760, 65th Cong., 2d Sess 
H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. 
S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.4 
12. 
14. 
16. 
17. 
18. 
19.

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
TABLE 37-B 
(CONTINUED) 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
20. 
Jun 30, 1948 
Sep 03, 1954 
Oct 27, 1965 
Sep 22, 1922 
Jan 21, 1927 
Jul 03, 1930 
Aug 30, 1935 
Jun 20, 1938 
Mar 02, 1945 
Mar 02, 1945 
Jun 30, 1948 
Sep 03, 1954 
Nov 30, 1994 
Sep 29, 1993 
Jun 25, 1910 
Aug 08, 1917 
Jun 26, 19346 
Mar 02, 19458 
Mar 02, 1919 
Aug 26, 1937 
Mar 02, 1945 
Jul 24, 1946 
Jul 03, 1958 
Jul 14, 1960 
Mar 4, 1913 
Oct 2, 1992 
Oct 28, 1993 
Aug 26, 1994 
37-35 
Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, OR, H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. 
to depth of 12 feet. 
Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula. S. Doc. 128, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' 
Construct South Jetty, 80,000 feet long. S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
UMPQUA RIVER, OR 
North Jetty, 7,500 feet long H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 
ocean bar. 
A short south jetty H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., 1st Sess' 
A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging Rivers and Harbors Committee 
to a 26-foot depth. Doc. 9,72d Cong., 1st Sess. 
Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth S. Doc. 158, 75th Cong.,3d Sess.' 
to Reedsport. 
Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel S. Doc. 86,76th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
to Gardiner, and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide 
and 800 feet long. 
Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 
10 feet deep, 175 feet wide , and 300 feet long at inner end. 
Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel S. Doc. 154, 80th Cong., 2d Sess.' 
to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 
12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. 
Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River. S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.' 
UMPQUA RIVER, WINCHESTER BAY, OR 
Place revetment along the west spit Sec. 111 of the Rivers and Harbors 
Flood Control Act of 1968, as 
amended, P.L. 90-483 
WESTPORT, OR - PUGET ISLAND, WA 
Channel Excavation Sec. 107, Rivers and Harbors Act 
of 1960 
WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR 
For purchase and rehabilitation of system and H. Doc. 202, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. 
construction of concrete division wall. and Annual Report, 1900, P. 4374 
Deepening of locks. H. Doc. 1060, 62d Cong., 3d Sess.' 
Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with 
funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers 
and Harbors. 
Construction of New Willamette Falls Locks. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. 
YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR 
Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under H. Doc. 109, 65th Cong., 
previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and 1st Sess. 
dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. 
Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 
1st Sess. 
26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, as far S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide 
along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 
22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. 
Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, OR. S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 
40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.' 
extension of jetties at entrance. 
A small boat basin, south shore. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers, 
Mar. 4, 1977 
YAQUINA RIVER, OR 
Construction of channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet Doc. 579, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. 
wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depot Creek. 
7.5 MCY STANDBY TIME 
In FY 1993, FY1994 and FY 1995 advertise for competitive bid 
at least 7.5 million cubic yards of the hopper dredge volume P.L. 102-377, 102 Cong. 
accomplished with government -owned dredges in FY 1992. P.L. 103-126 
P.L. 103-316 
21. 
22. 
23. 
24. 
25. 
26.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 37-B 
(CONTINUED) 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
28. 
29. 
Aug 30, 1935 
27. 
Oct 23, 1962 
Mar 07, 1974 
May 17, 1950 
Nov 17, 1986 
Jun 28, 1938 
Dec 22, 1944 
Jun 28, 1938 
Dec 22, 1944 
Oct 23, 1962 
Oct 07, 1970 
May 17, 1950 
Dec 22, 1944 
Jun 28, 1938 
Dec 22, 1944 
Oct 23, 1962 
Jun 4, 1993 
May 17, 1950 
Aug 15, 1985 
Jul 30, 1983 
Apr 19,1995 
Jun 22, 1936 
Jun 28, 1938 
May 17, 1950 
Oct 27, 1965 H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 
BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA 
Existing project was originally authorized Sep. 30, 1933, by 
Federal Emergengy Administration of Public Works. 
Existing project authorized by congress. S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 
2d Sess., (Report of Chief of 
Engineers dated Aug 21, 1933) 
37-36 
APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR 
Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Authorizes construction of project but no operation for P.L. 93-251 
irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. 
BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR 
Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 
Authorizes Construction of hydroelectric power facilities P.L. 99-662 
COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR 
Earthfill dam. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, 
facilities, as amended 
DORENA LAKE, OR 
Earthfill dam. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, 
facilities. as amended 
ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR 
Roller compacted concrete dam. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong.,2d Sess. 
Authorized construction but not operation for irrigation P.L. 91-439 
until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. 
FALL CREEK LAKE, OR 
Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, 
facilities. as amended 
FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR 
Earthfill embankment dam H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong. 3d Sess. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, 
facilities, as amended 
Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. H. Doc 403, 87th Cong. 2d Sess. 
Construction of waterfowl impoundments. Sec 1135, P.L.99-662 as amended 
LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA 
Provides bank protection on Columbia River below H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 
river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. 
MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA 
Authorized construction of sediment and retention structures. P.L. 99-88 
MT. ST. HELENS AND VICINITY, WA 
Implement and maintain flood control measures in Cowlitz P.L. 98-63 
and Toutle Rivers to assure flood protection for developed 
areas in the vicinity of such rivers against a one-hundredyear 
flood and to reduce sedimentation flow and the chance 
of blockage on the Columbia River. 
ROGUE RIVER, GRANTS PASS, OR 
Construction of emergency bank protection. Sec. 14, Flood Control Act of 1946 
as amended, P.L. 79-526 
WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR 
Bank protection works, with channel clearing. F.C. Act 1936 
Provide additional protection against flooding. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. 
Addition of 77 locations to scope of projects. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong.,2d Sess. 
WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR 
Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish 
and wildlife. 
30. 
31. 
32. 
33. 
36. 
37. 
38. 
39. 
41. 
42. 
43.

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
TABLE 37-B 
(CONTINUED) 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Aug 20, 1937 
Dec 22, 1944 
Mar 07, 1974 
Aug 22, 1984 
Oct 1992 
Jul 19, 1988 
Nov 1, 1988 
May 17, 1950 
Sep 03, 1954 
Oct 23, 1962 
June 28, 1938 
Jun 30, 1948 
May 17, 1950 
Sep 03, 1954 
Jul 14, 1960 
May 17, 1950 
May 17, 1950 
Dec 22, 1944 
Mar 24, 1965 
Jun 28, 1938 
Dec 22, 1944 
May 17, 1950 
Sep 21, 1962 
Oct 15, 1966 
May 17, 1950 
Dec 22, 1944 
Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville 
project under direction of Secretary of War and 
supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain 
provisions herein relating to powers and duties of 
onneville Power Administrator. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation 
facilities. 
Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville 
to new town site. 
Acquisition of Steigerwald Lake wetland area. 
Authorizes transfer of lands to town of North Bonneville, 
COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR and WA 
Design, test, and construct fish bypass facilities. 
Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, 
as amended 
P.L. 93-251 
P.L. 98-396 
P.L. 102-396, Sec. 9147 
P. L. 100-371 
COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA 
Authorizes project for mitigation of lost treaty fishing Title IV of P.L. 100-581 
access resulting from construction of Bonneville Dam. 
COUGAR LAKE, OR 
Rockfill dam. 
Addition of power 
Strube Lake reregulating dam. 
DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR 
Authorizes concrete gravity structure. 
Addition of power and regulating Big Cliff Dam with power. 
GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR 
Authorized Green Peter Dam in lieu of originally 
authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938). 
Addition of power at Green Peter and White Bridge 
Reregulating Dam. 
Changes location of reregulating dam from White 
Bridge location to Foster. 
HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR 
Earth and gravel fill dam. 
H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 
P.L. 83-780. 
P.L. 87-874 
H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. 
P.L. 858, 80th Cong.2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 
P.L. 83-780, F. C. Act 1954 
S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 
JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA 
Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, 
facilities. as amended 
John Day waterfowl management area. S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 
LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, OR 
Earth-and-gravel filled dam. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, 
facilities, as amended 
Addition of power and authorization of Dexter Lake H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 
as reregulating dam. 
LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR 
Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Authorizes construction of project but not operation for P.L. 89-689, Public Works 
irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. Approp. Act, 1967 
THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR 
Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, 
facilities, as amended 
1. Contains latest published maps. 
2. Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. 
3. Public Works Administration 
4. Includes following work, classified inactive. A channel to 
Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning 
basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works 
as needed. 
5. Inactive. 
6. Permanent appropriations Repeal Act. 
7. Flood Control Act 
8. Classified Deferred. 
9. Spur Jetty "B" classified inactive. 
37-37 
44. 
45. 
46. 
47. 
48. 
49. 
50. 
51. 
52. 
53.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 37-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1995 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual and 
Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance 
Alsea River, OR 
AstoriaTurning Basin, OR' 
Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR' 
Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks 
and Hood River, OR (Alteration) 
Cathlamet, WA' 
Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR' 
Clatskanie River, OR2 
Columbia River, Illwaco, WA' 
Coos & Millicoma Rivers, OR 
Cowlitz River, WA 
Cushman-Mapleton Channels 
(Siuslaw River), OR' 
Deep River, WA2 
Depoe Bay, OR' 
Elochoman Slough, WA2 
Grays River, WA2 
Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR' 
Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, 
Portland, OR to Vancouver WA (Alteration) 
Interstate Highway Bridge(Barge Channel), OR' 
Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA' 
Lake River, WA 
Lewis River, WA 
Long Tom River, OR 
Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR 
Multnomah Channel, OR2 
Nehalem Bay, OR 
Nestucca River, OR 
Oregon Slough, (North Portland Harbor), OR2 
Salmon River, OR2 
Smith River, OR2 
Skamokawa Creek, WA 
South Channel, Government Island, OR' 
South Slough (Charleston), OR' 
The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, Or'2 
The Dalles-Celilo Canal, Or and WA'3 
Tongue Point, OR' 
Umatilla Harbor, OR'4 
Westport Slough, OR2 
Willamette River above Portland and 
Yamhill River, OR 
Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR 
Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, Or' 
Yaquina River, OR' 
Youngs and Claskanie River, Or 
Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR2 
1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (sec. 107). 
2. Channel adequate for present commerce. 
3. Includes $15,537 for previous project 
4. Includes $23,489 for previous project. 
5. Excludes $42,000 contributed funds. 
6. Includes $239,529 for Sec. 107 project. 
7. Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 
8. Non-Federal funds, $1,204,100. 
9. Includes $419,557 for Sec. 107 project. 
10. Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. 
11. Excludes $102,000 contributed funds. 
12. Project abondoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. 
13. Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool. 
14. Project transferred to Portland District from Walla Walla 
District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day 
Dam pool. 
15. Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. 
16. Excludes $50,565 contributed funds 
17. Excludes $86,586 contributed funds. 
18. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds; includes $8,000 for 
previous project. 
19. Excludes $1,776,008 contributed funds. 
37-38 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Abandoned 
Abandoned 
Completed 
Abandoned 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
1977 
1985 
1944 
1971 
1985 
1969 
1986 
1991 
1985 
1975 
1963 
1971 
1990 
1941 
1977 
1961 
1963 
1986 
1983 
1985 
1982 
1987 
1963 
1949 
1974 
1991 
1985 
1970 
1939 
1957 
1992 
1952 
1966 
1985 
1985 
1979 
1971 
1979 
2,000 
870,139 
1,173,524 
1,081,806 
171,467 
1,197,300 
19,240 3 
1,589,231 
350,238 18 
277,436 6 
329,423 
15,384 
145,588 5 
18,641 17 
2,500 
519,090 ' 
1,154,162 8 
15,281 
302,000 
2,700 
58,132 
437,669 9 
302,006 o10 
16,881 
2,145 
143,120 
2,400 
119,800 n 
26,821 
3,903,780 
4,716,205 
2,807,876 19 
16,276 
862,918 
1,616,369 
891,695 15 
195,313 16 
2,000 
9,348 
26,237 
16,648 
194,8964 
2,152,914 
1,474,036 
32,768 
196,864 
35,670 
58,127 
685,677 
4,000 
25,000 
55,195 
6,000 
90,514 
205,130 
436,185 
559,858 
2,833,888 
171,909 
17,900,293 
34,449

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1995 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual and 
Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance 
COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN 
Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 163,397 
Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, 
Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1941 163,291 
Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1942 69,724 
Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR Completed 1943 574,123 
Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 
Diking District 5, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 
Diking and Improvement District 5, 
Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1940 161,381 
Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and 
Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1941 258,795 
Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County WA Completed 1941 26,810 
Dildnkingand Improvement District 4, 
Wahkiakum County, OR Completed 1951 169,542 
Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 240,939 
John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 33,080 
Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1941 25,773 
Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 18,789 
Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 158,419 
Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1961 91,652 
Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 61,186 
Marshland Drainage District, 
Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 39,475 
Midland Drainage District Columbia County, OR Completed 1939 77,774 a 
Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1951 593,034 4 
Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah 
County, OR Completed 1942 241,148 
Port of Kalama, WA' Completed 99,844 
Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1942 47,662 
Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah 
County, OR Completed 1951 1,623,505 
Scappoose Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,991,558 
Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1946 178,885 
Wahkiakum County Consolidated 
Diking District No. 1, WA Completed 1985 5,289,833 
Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 133,778 
Upper Grays River Area, WA Completed 1947 61,263 
State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA' Completed 1985 504,642 1 
Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 66,932 
Warrenton Diking District, 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 69,503 
Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 74,596 
Webb District Improvement Co.,Columbia 
County, OR Completed 1940 84,592 
Westland District Improvement Co., 
Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 205,531 
Westport District Columbia and Clatsop 
Counties, OR Completed 1943 40,658 
Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 22,797 
Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 248,802 
LEWIS RIVER BASIN 
Diking and Improvement District 11, 
Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1943 172,521 
COWLITZ RIVER BASIN 
Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement 
District 1, WA Completed 1939 42,978 
Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz 
County, WA Completed 1939 28,592 
Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA1 Completed 1985 250,000 
LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN 
Beaver Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,131,944 
Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement 
District No. 2, WA Completed 1977 1,661,367 
Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA Completed 1967 363,000 
Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Completed 1967 65,345 
Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Completed 1967 304,794 
Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA1 Completed 236,860 
Hayden Island, U Inactive 
Midland Drainage District, OR Completed 1971 304,511 
37-39

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 37-E 
(CONTINUED) 
OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1995 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual and 
Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance 
Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR 
Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR 
Rainier Drainage District, OR 
Sandy Drainage District, OR 
Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR 
Vancouver Lake Area, WA 
Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, WA 
Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR 
Woodson Drainage District, OR 
WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN 
Amazon Creek, OR 
Mill Creek, Salem, OR 
Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR1 
Whelton Ditch, OR 
ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL 
Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR7 
Bear Creek, Medford, OR1 
Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR2 
Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA 
Catching Inlet Drainage District Coos River, OR2 
Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR' 
Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR 
Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) 
Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR' 
Deschutes River, Bend, OR2 
John Day River (West), OR' 
Johnson Creek, OR 
McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR' 
McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR2 
Miami River, OR' 
Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR 
Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR2 
Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR2 
Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR' 
Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR' 
Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR9 
(a) Riverside Area Units 
(b) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1) 
(c) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)2 
Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR9 
Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR2 
Rogue River, OR' 
Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR2 
Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA' 
Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR' 
Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR' 
Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR2 
Sumner Parker Airport, OR' 
Trask River, Tillamook County, OR' 
Tualatin, OR 
Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR' 
Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR' 
Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR 
Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR 
West Makinster Rd., Wilson River, OR' 
Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR' 
1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 14). 
2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 
3. Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act Funds 
4. Excludes $25,000 contributed funds 
5. Previous completed project, $138,956; $15,056 engineering costs 
project constructed by local interests. 
6. Excludes $154,751 contributed funds. 
7. Project transferred from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and 
abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. Includes 
$3,328 FY 1960 preauthorization costs, Sec. 205, P.L. 80-85. See 
FY 1960 Annual Report, page 1887 
8. Excludes $2,520 contributed funds 
9. Reported by Walla Walla District prior to 1974 
10. Excludes $230,070 contributed funds for new work and $31,284 
Government furnished sheet steel pile. 
11. Includes $254,642 contributed funds. 
12. Includes $185,000 contributed funds. 
13. Excludes $5,822 contributed funds. 
14. Excludes $31,031 contributed funds. 
15. Excludes $98,313 contributed funds. 
37-40 
Completed 
Active 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Deferred 
Inactive 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Inactive 
Abandoned 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Deferred 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Active 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Deferred 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
1964 
1961 
1967 
1954 
1966 
1981 
1971 
1973 
1964 
1960 
1993 
1967 
1950 
1967 
1957 
1959 
1952 
1982 
1988 
1986 
1981 
1985 
1966 
1948 
1955 
1952 
1960 
1959 
1960 
1939 
1971 
1960 
1985 
1994 
1961 
1984 
1985 
1985 
1952 
1952 
1986 
1,499,186 
35,265 
593,945 
154,012 s 
674,137 
889,391 
48,619 
1,803,488 
162,500 
1,214,300 6 
175,800 14 
276,700 
39,624 
23,439 
23,050 
106,198 
104,921 
182,655 
42,761 
70,845 8 
1,307,216 
22,963 
106,250 13 
127,800 
170,245 
29,500 
148,358 
15,321 
118,433 
55,007 
55,189 
11,690 
16,000 
9,100 
267,748 
161,540 
143,263 
968,716 o10 
86,230 
288,447 
435,000 12 
365,000 is 
215,939 
176,351 
92,500 
121,273 
1,803,094 
33,835 
154,600 
428,881 
45,677 
176,000 
30,000

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
TABLE 37-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, 
INCLUDING POWER 
For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1995 
Full Report Operation 
Project See Annual and Status Report for Construction Maintenance 
Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Completed 1969 185,000 
Bonneville, OR 
Columbia and Snake Rivers Ports Inactive 1994 5,799,926 
Dredging, OR & WA 
TABLE 37-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Date Funds Funds 
Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Area East of Albany, OR 1977 
Bachelor Island, WA 1977 
Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1966 1971 4,559 
Calapooya River, OR 1959 1965 11,595 
Cascadia Lake, OR 1987 954,114 1 
Clatakanie River Area, Columbia County, OR 1960 1965 268 
Clatskanie Drainage Dist. 1, OR 1964 1978 18,543 
Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR 1960 1974 4,472 
Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR 1938 1961 258 
Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR 1978 
Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR 1961 1978 8,824 
Columbia Drainage District No.1, OR 1987 
Columbia Slough, OR 1953 1978 21,352 
Coquille River, OR 1948 1953 908 
Cowlitz County Consolidate Diking Improvement 
District 1, OR 1977 
Cowlitz River at Randle, WA 1962 1977 11,095 
Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1960 1970 6,819 
Deer Island Drainage District, OR 1987 
East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR 1959 1970 6,465 
Ferguson Creek Long Tom River, Or 1978 
Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1977 
Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR 1977 
Gate Creek Lake, OR 1987 745,001 2 
Holley Lake, OR 1963 1987 241,992 3 
John Drainage District, OR 1961 1979 23,754 
John Day River, OR 1974 1974 210,220 
Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA 1969 1978 55,594 
Lake River Delta Area, WA 1977 
Lewis River Area, WA 1978 
Magruder Drainage District, OR 1940 1974 774 
Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR 1977 
Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR 1987 9,000 
Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR 1942 1977 43,292 
Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR 1963 1968 4,558 
Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR 1941 1978 125 
Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 1962 1977 11,318 
Pudding River, OR 1950 1979 5,000 
Shelton Ditch, Marion County, Or 1967 1987 39,624 
Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA 1939 1979 
Soap Creek, WA 1977 
Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR 1978 
Umatilla River (Echo), OR 1960 1964 24,145 
Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR 1987 4,000 
Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR 1958 
West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR 1962 1970 4,056 
Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) 1966 1977 
Wiley Creek Lake, OR 1960 112,000 
Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill 
River, OR (uncompleted portions) 1987 
Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR 1961 
Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 1948 1987 142,883 
1. Excludes Pro-rata share of $112,000 for Sweet Home Reservoir. 3. Excludes $100,000 preauthorization study costs. 
2. Excludes Pro-rata share of $95,000 for Quartz Creek Reservoir
37-41

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 37-H COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER 
BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR 
TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1995 
(SEE SECTION 3 OF TEXT) 
Funds New Work 
Regular 
Public Works 
Emergency Relief Administration 
Total U.S. 
Contributed Prior to 1964 
Contributed (1975) 35 to 40-foot Channel 
Total Contributed 
Total All Funds 
28,349,304 
446,296 
138,449 
28,934,049 
223,026 
442,928 
665,954 
29,600,003 
Maintenance 
336,771,698 
14,414 
98,668 
336,884,780 
24,320 
24,320 
336,909,100 
TABLE 37-I NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
(SEE SECTION 13 OF TEXT) 
Fiscal Year Costs 
Federal Non-Federal Total 
Channels and Harbors (Section 107) 
Columbia River, Vancouver, WA4 17,049 31,248 48,297 
Newport, OR 2 230,956 230,512 461,468 
Port of Morrow, OR1 13,713 13,713 
Westport, OR - Puget Island, WA4 13,194 1,466 14,660 
TOTAL Channels and Harbors 274,912 263,226 538,138 
Mitigation of Shore Damages (Section 111) 
Umpqua River, Winchester Bay, OR4 470,806 470,806 
TOTAL Mitigation of Shore Damages 470,806 470,806 
1.Reconnaissance Study 4.Construction Funds 
2.Feasibility Report 5.Construction Completed 
3.Plans and Specifications 
TABLE 37-J PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS 
(SEE SECTION 15 OF TEXT) 
Project Date Survey Conducted 
Depot Slough, OR Mar 1995 
Oregon Slough, OR Jun 1995 
Tillamook, OR May 1995 
Willamette River, OR Oct 1994 
Youngs Bay, OR Jul 1995 
37-42 
Total 
365,121,002 
460,710 
237,117 
365,818,829 
247,346 
442,928 
690,274 
366,509,103

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
TABLE 37-K WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR 
PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS 
(SEE SECTION 23 OF TEXT) 
Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet 1 
Lift of each lock Lock 1 (Lower), 22,5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet and 
Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet 2 
Depth of Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet 
Character of foundation Rock 
Kind of Dam Fixed3 
Type of Construction Concrete 
Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 
Cost Unknown; purchase price $375,000 
1. A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher states powerplants operated by Crown Zellerbach Corp., and Portland 
of water, is at upper end of canal basin. Ry., Light & Power Co., which is now being operated by Portland 
2. A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending from Lock 4 General Electric Co. 
to Guard Lock, separates upper basin of canal from head race, 3. The dam is owned by private parties. 
which formerly led directly from basin and supplied water for 
TABLE 37-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
(SEE SECTION 34 OF TEXT) 
Fiscal Year Costs 
Federal Non-Federal Total 
Flood Control (Section 205) 
Lakeside, OR1 72 72 
Nehalem River, Sunset Drainage District, OR2 56,608 56,608 
Peninsula Drainage District #1, OR2 170,853 155,226 326,079 
Scappoose, OR1 51 51 
Warrenton Drainage District #1, OR2 
_17 17 
TOTAL Flood Control 227,601 155,226 382,827 
Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14) 
Rogue River, Grants Pass, OR4 96227 18,17514 
TOTAL Emergency Bank Protection 96,227 18,175 114,402 
Project Modification for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135) 
Fern Ridge Lake Marsh Restoration, OR2 22,508 22,508 
Coos Bay Western Snowy Plover, OR2 24,246 24,246 
Dairy Creek, OR 2 24,948 24,948 
Trestle Bay, OR3,4 128,420 34,687 163,107 
Amazon Creek Wetlands, OR2 174,756 174,756 
Initial Appraisals/Coordination 21,8272.827 
TOTAL Project Modification for Improvement of 
Environment 396,705 34,687 431,392 
1.Reconnaissance Study 
2.Feasibility Report 
3.Plans and Specifications 
4.Construction Funds 
5.Construction Completed 
37-43

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 37-M FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 
See Section 
in Text 
Date of 
Project Peak Inflow 
Peak Inflow 
Cu. FtJSec. 
Storage Used 
Acre/feet 
27. Applegate Lake, OR Jan 31, 1995 7,840 17,520 
28. Blue River Lake, OR Jan 13, 1995 8,780 20,610 
29. Cottage Grove Lake, OR Jan 13, 1995 5,560 1,750 
46. Cougar Lake, OR Jan 13, 1995 8,980 31,510 
47. Detroit Lake, OR Jan 14, 1995 20,510 74,140 
30. Dorena Lake, OR Jan 13, 1995 15,830 35,380 
32. Fall Creek Lake, OR Jan 13, 1995 11,840 25,310 
33. Fern Ridge Lake, OR Jan 14, 1995 12,310 32,750 
48. Foster Lake, OR Jan 14, 1995 14,020 3,050 
48. Green Peter Lake, OR Jan 14, 1995 17,650 48,840 
49. Hills Creek Lake, OR Jan 14, 1995 11,410 38,700 
51. Lookout Point Lake, OR Jan 14, 1995 20,610 50,490 
52. Lost Creek Lake, OR Feb 1, 1995 10,860 39,300 
TABLE 37-N PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING 
NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT 
Project 
Bonneville Lock and Dam 
OR and WA -- 
Lake Bonneville 
(See Section 43 of Text) 
NAVIGATION LOCK (NEW) 
Dimensions: 
Clear Width of Chamber 
Greatest Length Available for Full Width 
Lift (Vertical): 
At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level 
At Normal River Stage 
At Extreme High Water 
Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water 
Character of Foundation 
Open to Navigation 
SPILLWAY DAM 
Type of Construction 
Completed 
Capacity 
Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway 
Height above Lowest Foundation 
Length of Dam Proper 
Length of Dam Overall 
Width at Base 
Gate Openings 
Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) 
Elevation(Normal)(Above Mean Sea Level) 
POWERPLANT 
Length (First Powerhouse) 
Length (Second Powerhouse) 
Width (First Powerhouse) 
Width (Second Powerhouse) 
Height (Roof to Bedrock) (First Powerhouse) 
Height (Roof to Bedrock)(Second Powerhouse) 
Generator (Station Unit) 
Generators (First Powerhouse) 
Generators (Second Powerhouse) 
Fishwater Supply Units (Second Powerhouse) 
Total Rated Capacity 
Speed 
86 Feet 
675 Feet 
66 Feet 
59 Feet 
About 30 Feet 
19 Feet 
Andesite 
March 1993 
Concrete Gravity 
1938 
1,600,000 CFS 
23.3 Feet 
About 170 Feet 
1,090 Feet 
1,230 Feet 
200 Feet 
18 
24 Feet Pool 
72 Feet 
1,027 Feet 
953 Feet 
190 Feet 
235 Feet 
190 Feet 
200 Feet 
1 @ 5,000 kw 
1 @ 48,000 kw 
1 @ 59,500 kw 
8 @ 60,000 kw each 
8 @ 66,500 kw each 
2 @ 13,100 kw each 
1,145,700 kw 
75 Revolutions per Minute 
37-44

PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 
TABLE 37-N 
(Continued) 
PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING 
NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT 
Project 
John Day Lock and Dam, 
OR and WA -- 
Lake Umatilla 
(See Section 50 of Text) 
The Dalles Lock and 
Dam, OR and WA -- 
Lake Celilo 
(See Section 53 of Text) 
NAVIGATION LOCK 
Clear Width 
Clear Length 
Lift: 
Minimum 
Average 
Maximum 
Minimum Water Depth Over Sills 
Opened to Navigation 
SPILLWAY DAM 
Type of Construction 
Completed 
Maximum Capacity 
Crest Elevation 
Control Gates: 
Type 
Size, Width by Height 
Number 
POWERPLANT 
Length 
Width 
Generating Units: 
Number Installed 
Space for Additional 
Rating, Each 
Total Installed Capacity 
Total Potential Capacity 
Maximum Structural Height 
First Power-On-Line 
IMPOUNDMENT 
Elevations: Normal Operating Range 
Maximum 
Flood Control Storage 
Lake Length 
Lake Water Surface Area At Elevation 268 
Navigation Channel, Depth by Width 
Length of Shoreline 
NAVIGATION LOCK 
Type 
Lift Normal 
Net Clear Length 
Net clear Width 
Normal Depth Over Upper Sill 
Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill 
Opened To Navigation 
SPILLWAY DAM 
Type 
Elevation of Crest 
Top of Crest Gates 
Number of Gates 
Size of Gates 
Height (Foundation to Crest) 
Design Flood 
POWERPLANT 
Powerhouse Dimensions 
Generators Main Units 
Fishwater Supply Units 
Total Rated Capacity 
Station Service Units 
86 Feet 
669 feet 
97 Feet 
105 Feet 
113 Feet 
15 Feet 
April 1968 
Concrete Gravity 
March 1968 
2,250,000 cfs 
210 Feet 
Tainter 
50 ft. by 58.5 Ft. 
20 
1,975 Feet 
243 Feet 
16 
4
135,000 kw 
2,160,000 kw 
2,700,000 kw 
235 Feet 
July 1968 
268-257 Feet 
276 Feet 
500,000 Ac.-ft. 
76.4 Miles 
55,000 Acres 
15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 
200 miles 
Single Lift 
87.5 Feet 
675 Feet 
86 Feet 
20 Feet 
15 Feet 
March 17, 1957 
Controlled 
121 Ft. msl 
162 Ft. msl 
23 
50 by 43 Feet 
120 Feet 
2,290,000 cfs 
240 by 2,150 feet 
14 @ 78,000 kw each 
8 @ 86,000 kw each 
2 @ 13,500 kw each 
1,807,000 kw 
2 @ 3,000 kw each 
37-45

SEATTLE, WA, DISTRICT *
This District comprises Washington State except southern 
and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and northwestern 
Montana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to 
Pacific Ocean south of international boundary to Cape 
Disappointment, and to the Columbia River above Yakima 
River, inclusively. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation 
1. Anacortes Harbor, WA ............... 
2. Bellingham Harbor, WA .............. 
3. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA ..... 
4. Friday Harbor, WA ................. 
5. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA ....... 
6. Grays Harbor, Point Chehalis, WA ......... 
7. Lake Crockett, WA ................. 
8. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA ......... 
9. Navigation Work under Special Authorization . . 
10. Neah Bay, WA .................... 
11. Olympia Harbor, WA ................ 
12. Project Condition Surveys ............. 
13. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA .... 
14. Quillayute River, WA ................. 
15. Seattle Harbor, WA ........ . ........ 
16. Swinomish Channel, WA .............. 
17. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle 
River, WA ................ 
Beach Erosion Control 
18. Beach Erosion Work under Special 
Authorization ........ 
19. Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA . . 
Flood Control 
20. Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and 
Cosmopolis, WA ......... 
21. Flathead River near Kalispell, MT. ..... 
22. Flood Control Work under Special 
Authorization .......... 
23. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA ....... 
24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control 
Projects .............. 
25. La Conner, WA ............... 
26. Lummi Shore Road, Whatcom County, WA 
27. Mud Mountain Dam, WA ......... 
28. Sammamish River Restoration, WA .... 
29. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir 
Operations ............ 
30. Stillaguamish, River, WA ........... 
38-2 
38-2 
38-2 
38-3 
38-3 
38-4 
38-4 
38-5 
38-5 
38-5 
38-5 
38-6 
38-6 
38-6 
38-7 
38-7 
38-7 
....... 38-8 
....... 38-8 
.... 38-8 
.... 38-9 
.... 38-9 
.... 38-9 
.... 38-9 
.... 38-9 
.... 38-10 
.... 38-10 
... . 38-10 
.... 38-11 
.. .. 38-11 
31. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA ............ 38-11 
Multiple-Purpose with Power 
32. Albeni Falls Dam, ID ............ 
33. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA 
34. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT...... 
38-11 
38-12 
38-12 
Miscellaneous 
35. Miscellaneous Work under Special 
Authorization ......... ...... 38-13 
General Investigations 
36. Surveys................... 
37. Collection and Study of Basic Data .... 
38. Preconstruction Engineering and Design . 
. 38-13. 
. 38-13 
. 38-13 
Tables 
Table 38-A Cost & Financial Statement ....... .38-14 
Table 38-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 38-21 
Table 38-C Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects .................. 38-26 
Table 38-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion 
Control Projects .............. 38-26 
Table 38-E Other Authorized Flood Control 
Projects .................. 38-27 
Table 38-F Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose 
with Power Projects ........... 38-30 
Table 38-G Deauthorized Projects ........... 38-30 
Table 38-H Lake Washington Ship Canal, 
WA, Principal Features of Double 
Lock andDm................38-31 
Table 38-I Project Conditions Surveys ........ 38-32 
Table 38-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant 
to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 . . . 38-32 
Table 38-K Emergency Flood Control Activities - 
Public Law 99, 84th Congress ...... 38-32 
-38-1-

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
Navigation 
1. ANACORTES HARBOR, WA 
Location. On northern point of Fidalgo Island in Puget 
Sound, 17 miles south of Bellingham, WA, and 64 miles 
north of Seattle. The main harbor is on Guemes Channel. 
(See NOAA Survey Chart 18427.) 
Existing project. Channel in Capsante Waterway, 12 feet 
deep and 150 to 250 feet wide, between east side of Q 
Avenue and deep water in Fidalgo Bay, a distance of 2,850 
feet; a mooring basin 12 feet deep, 570 feet wide, and 960 
feet long adjacent to north side of Capsante Waterway, 
protected by two pile breakwaters, each 470 feet long, east 
and southeast of basin; and a navigation channel 18 feet 
deep, 150 feet wide, extending 5,180 feet from deep water 
in Guemes Channel to the west shore of Fidalgo Bay (construction 
under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction 
cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38-C). 
Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between 
mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 
feet. Extreme range is about 15.5 feet. Project was completed 
in January 1977. (For further details, see Annual 
Report for 1977.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are 24 piers and wharves in 
the Port of Anacortes; 15 on Guemes Channel, 3 on Capsante 
Waterway, and 7 on Fidalgo Bay. Three wharves on 
Guemes Channel are open for public use; of these, one is 
publicly owned and operated and used for handling general 
cargo in foreign and domestic trade. In addition, two 
wharves are used for ferries plying to the San Juan Islands 
and to Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Both are publicly 
owned and operated. Two of the wharves on Capsante 
Waterway and basin are publicly owned and operated and 
used for receiving petroleum products, and as a moorage 
for fishing and pleasure craft. All other wharves are used 
for general industrial purposes. In addition, there are two 
oil-refinery wharves located to the south of Capsante Waterway 
which are privately owned and operated and used 
for handling petroleum products in foreign and domestic 
trade. These facilities are considered adequate for existing 
commerce. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, 
Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, 
revised 1987.) 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Routine coordination with Port of Anacortes, city of 
Anacortes, and navigation users. The Port of Anacortes 
contributed $379,248 for added cost to rehandle and place 
99,802 cubic yards of sandy dredged material from Swinomish 
Channel to a Port redevelopment site. Dredged resource 
was used for preloading and grading purposes. 
Channel condition survey was conducted. 
2. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA 
Location. Part of Bellingham Bay, an arm of Puget 
Sound, at Bellingham, in northwestern Washington. (See 
NOAA Survey Chart 18424.) 
Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep in Whatcom 
Creek Waterway from deep water to head of harbor, 363.2 
feet wide to 750 feet from inner end, thence 18 feet deep 
for inner 750 feet; I & J Street Waterway, a channel 100 
feet wide and 18 feet deep at mean lower low water for a 
distance of 3,200 feet; Squalicum Creek Waterway, including 
dredging an entrance channel 200 feet wide and 26 feet 
deep from deep water in the bay to main pierhead line, and 
maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum 
Creek basin to 26 feet deep, provided that no dredging 
can be done within 75 feet of wharves, piers, or similar 
structures; and small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum 
Creek Waterway by construction and maintenance of two 
sections of rubblemound breakwater with combined length 
of 5,400 feet, including maintenance of minimum depths of 
12 feet in entrance to basin. Plane of reference is mean 
lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and 
mean higher high water is 8.6 feet. Extreme range is about 
16 feet.The small-boat basin expansion from 3,900 feet to 
5,400 feet at Squalicum Creek Waterway and channel at I 
& J Street Waterway were constructed under authority of 
Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction costs for these features 
are recorded in Table 38-C. Project was completed in 
October 1980. (For further details see Annual Report for 
1981. For details relating to previous project see page 797 
of Annual Report for 1907.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements 
are described in full on page 38-2 of FY 1980 Annual 
Report. 
Terminal facilities. Of the forty wharves and piers in 
Bellingham Harbor, 9 are on Whatcom Creek Waterway; 3 
on Squalicum Creek Waterway; 3 on I&J Street Waterway; 
and 9 on Bellingham Bay. Two wharves on Whatcom Creek 
Waterway serve general cargo terminals. One is publicly 
owned and operated and is suitable for use by ocean-going 
vessels; the other one is privately owned and operated. 
There is one publicly owned terminal and small-boat harbor 
with 11 wharves handling private craft and fishing boats. 
(See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port 
Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 
1987.) 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Channel condition surveys were conducted. 
Maintenance, contract: A continuing contract was 
awarded in August to clamshell dredge 190,000 cy of shoal 
material from the Federal Squalicum Creek Waterway for 
$625,700. Berthing areas are being dredged by the Port of 
Bellingham. All dredged material is being disposed in 
open water sites. 
3. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH 
RIVER, WA 
Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession 
Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern 
Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles 
above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18444.) 
Existing project. Training dike extending from a point 
opposite 23rd Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of 
Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to 
pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 
1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal 
of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River 
outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from 
deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence 
-38-2-

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet 
deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep upriver 
to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 
miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 
mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and 
maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. Plane of reference 
is mean lower low water. Range between mean 
lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. 
Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. Project was completed 
in April 1963. (For further details, see page 1683 of Annual 
Report for 1963. For details relating to previous projects, 
see page 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of 
Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report 
for 1938.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements 
are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual 
Report. 
Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in 
the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the 
Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals 
with four berths handling ocean-going vessels and 
1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling 
fishing and pleasure craft. A portion of the East Waterway 
has been deepened and modified by the U.S. Navy for a 
Homeport. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, 
Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, 
revised 1987.) 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout 
the year. Aerial survey of the Jetty Island habitat development 
site was performed. The city of Everett drafted a 
dredged material disposal plan with funding provided by 
the Port of Everett and Washington State Department of 
Ecology. Coordination resulted in four upland disposal 
sites becoming available for disposal of dredged material 
from the Federal channel in FY 96. 
4. FRIDAY HARBOR, WA 
Location. Friday Harbor is located on the eastern shore 
of San Juan Island on the inland waters of northwestern 
Washington, about 28 nautical miles east of Victoria, British 
Columbia, and 60 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. 
San Juan Island is one of over 170 islands in the San Juan 
Archipelago. Friday Harbor is the San Juan Island county 
seat and a United States Customs Port of Entry. (See 
NOAA Survey Chart 18425.) 
Existing project. 1,600-foot concrete breakwater to protect 
the existing port facilities and to allow the Port of 
Friday Harbor to provide 294 additional permanent moorage 
spaces and 44 additional transient spaces. Construction 
was completed in March 1984. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements 
are described in full on page 38-4 of FY 1981 Annual 
Report. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Routine coordination with the Port of Friday Harbor, 
U.S. Coast Guard, and navigation users. Conducted an 
annual inspection of the breakwater. 
5. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, 
WA
Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in 
southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance 
to Columbia River. Inner portion comprises two 
main channels, the south and the north, connecting harbor 
proper with Chehalis River at Aberdeen. Chehalis River 
rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles 
east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and 
empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA 
Survey Chart 18502.) 
Existing project (including navigation improvements 
to date). Provides for an entrance channel across the bar 
and through entrance 600 to 1000 feet wide and 38 to 46 
feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long 
and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, both at an elevation of 
16 feet, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 36 feet 
deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 
14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet 
wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet 
upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, 
a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 
feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot 
channel near Cosmopolis; three breakwaters at, and maintenance 
of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; protection 
of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet; 
and removal of 350-foot southwestern extension of the 
breakwater, replacing it with an 865-foot northeastern extension, 
and adding a 200-foot spur breakwater along the 
southerly entrance, constructed under authority of Section 
107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is 
recorded in Table 38-C. Plane of reference is mean lower 
low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and 
mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 
feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range 
is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 
23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). Rehabilitation 
of 4,000 feet of the south jetty was completed in 
October 1966. Project was completed in 1981. (For further 
details, see Annual Report for 1981. For details relating to 
previous projects, see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 
1915 and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938.) 
Improved project. Authorized by Section 202 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Project construction 
was started in April 1990. Completed project 
features are: deepen and widen 20 miles of existing 30-foot 
channel across ocean bar (46 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide), 
through the harbor entrance (46-38 feet deep and 1,000-600 
feet wide), through South to Cow Point Reaches (36 feet 
deep and 350 feet wide); expand and deepen Cow Point 
turning basin; deepen two downstream local berths; and 
construct fish and crab mitigation. Remaining project features 
are: deepen and widen 3.5 miles of existing 30-foot 
river channel (36 feet deep and 300-250 feet wide); expand 
Elliott Slough turning basin; deepen two upstream local 
berths; improve navigation aids; remove two old highway 
bridge piers; and relocate utility lines. Modification of 
Union Pacific Railroad bridge was deleted from project 
scope in 1995. Remainder of project is currently unscheduled, 
pending resolution of local issues affecting 
remaining scope. Revised estimated project cost is 
$41,300,000 ($26,100,000 Federal; $15,200,000 non- 
Federal). 
-38-3-

REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local Cooperation 
Agreement with Port of Grays Harbor, local sponsor 
for improvement project, was executed on February 16, 
1990. The Port is contributing 35 percent of improved 
project cost. In complying with terms of local cooperation, 
the Port is required to furnish lands and diked disposal areas 
and assure relocation of utility lines. 
Terminal facilities. There are 20 waterfront facilities 
(piers, wharves, and docks), exclusive of those available to 
recreational craft, at Grays Harbor, of which five are publicly 
owned. In foreign and domestic trade, they serve 
various purposes which include the receipt and/or shipment 
of: logs and lumber, woodchips, conventional and containerized 
general cargo, seafood and fishing supplies, sand and 
gravel, and construction materials. Other uses include: 
mooring and icing fishing boats, mooring small vessels for 
outfitting and repair, and mooring company owned tugs. 
Those piers operated by the U.S. Coast Guard moor government 
owned vessels. (See Port Series No. 35 - Ports of 
Tacoma, Olympia, and Grays Harbor, WA, revised 1993.) 
Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: 
Supervised crab mitigation monitoring. Coordinated with 
Port of Grays Harbor (local sponsor), resource agencies, 
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern 
Railroad, and Weyerhaeuser Company. 
New work, contract: A-E contracts covered crab utilization 
of mitigation sites. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys 
were conducted throughout the year. The Corps hopper 
dredge Yaquina dredged in South Reach in July, testing a 
device to reduce the entrainment of dungeness crab. 25,459 
cy were dredged at a cost of $235,248. 
Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the harbor 
by clamshell and hopper dredges was completed at a 
cost of $3,554,504 with 1,548,099 cy of material being 
removed. Material was borrowed from the outer harbor by 
hopper contract and booster pump to close the breach 
formed at the land connection to the south jetty. Cost was 
$3,730,000 with 600,000 cy of fill sand being placed. In 
May/June 146,195 cy of the fill material was relocated from 
the inside harbor location of the fill to the ocean side to 
optimize erosion control. Scrapers and dozers moved the 
material at a cost of $210,521. Crab mitigation for the 
incremental increase in crab entrainment due to the higher 
post-improvement channel maintenance dredging volume 
was completed in May. This was accomplished by spreading 
10,000 cy of oyster shell over 25 acres to create enhanced 
crab habitat at a cost of $490,000. A contract was 
awarded in September to place 200,000 to 300,000 cy of 
maintenance dredging sand on a beach adjacent to Westport 
at bid price of $1,700,000. This work is only partially 
funded under O&M authority. 
6. GRAYS HARBOR, POINT CHEHALIS, WA 
Location. Point Chehalis is located on the south side of 
the mouth of Grays Harbor, adjacent to the federally authorized 
navigation project. Point Chchalis is about 30 miles 
from the city of Aberdeen, in the comnnunity of Westport, 
WA. 
Existing project. Shoreline erosion has been occurring 
along the Point Chehalis shoreline for a number of years. 
The Point Chehalis erosion protection project was authorized 
in 1948 and constructed in 1954. Current erosion 
threatens Westport's sewage treatment plant and outfall 
line. Studies indicate that the south jetty, part of the Federal 
navigation project, is contributing to the erosion problem. 
Various alternatives were evaluated and beach 
nourishment with periodic renourishment over a 10-year 
period was selected as the recommended plan. Approximately 
300,000 cy of maintenance dredging will be placed 
on the beach to control erosion. Project completion is 
scheduled for December 1995, with an estimated cost of 
$1,225,000. 
Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of Westport) 
is responsible for operation and maintenance of the project 
after the 10th year. A Project Cooperation Agreement was 
executed on September 1, 1995. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: 
Completed feasibility studies, prepared plans and specifications, 
executed Project Cooperation Agreement, and advertised 
and awarded construction contract. 
New work, contract: Initiated contract work for beach 
nourishment. 
7. LAKE CROCKETT, WA 
Location. The harbor is on the west side of Whidbey 
Island, about 35 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. The 
lake lies parallel to Admiralty Bay and is separated from it 
by a narrow strip of gravel beach. (See NOAA Survey Chart 
18441.) 
Existing project. Provides for a basin in Lake Crockett 
with an area of about 6 acres and 25 feet deep at mean lower 
low water, connected with Admiralty Bay by a channel of 
the same depth and 200 feet wide, protected by a breakwater; 
and navigation improvement by dredging, constructed 
under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction 
cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38-C (Keystone 
Harbor, Admiralty Inlet). The diurnal tidal range in Admiralty 
Bay is 8.4 feet and the extreme range is about 16.5 
feet. Project was completed in March 1993. (For further 
details, see Annual Report for 1993.) Recreational facilities 
at project under cost-sharing agreement with Washington 
State Parks and Recreation Commission include the 
following construction and improvements: construct a 35- 
unit camping loop and restroom, new boat ramp handling 
facility, breakwater, a restroom in the day-use area and 
porto-potti dumps for boats; and expand day-use facility 
and add riprap at the construction site. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and privately 
owned passenger and automobile ferry landing within the 
dredged basin is open for public use, and is adequate for 
existing commercial traffic. The basin contains two publicly 
owned boat ramps open for public use. The ramps are 
adequate for recreational craft. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Channel condition surveys were conducted during the 
-38-4-

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
year. An internal Environmental Compliance Assessment 
for Ft. Casey State Park (which includes this project) was 
conducted. 
8. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA 
Location. Entirely within city of Seattle and extends 
from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, 
Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in 
Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) 
Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed 
dam from gated spillway and necessary accessory works, 
including fishladder, at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon 
Bay, about 1.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for 
a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound 
to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, 
with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep 
at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet 
to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 
600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks 
and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; 
and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from 
locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 
feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through 
Union Bay to Lake Washington. Section included in project 
is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower 
low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between 
mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 
feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low 
water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is 24 
inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet. Principal 
features of double lock and dam (structures are at Seattle, 
WA) are set forth in Table 38-H. Project was completed in 
1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935. For 
details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual 
Report for 1915, and page 1880 of Annual Report for 
1938.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. The eighteen waterfront facilities at 
Lake Washington Ship Canal are used for fuel oil, seafood, 
marine repair, drydocking, outfitting, mooring fishing vessels 
and repairs to the locks' equipment. Project is a part of 
Seattle Harbor's inner harbor. (See Port Series No. 36, 
revised 1993.) 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Locks were operated and maintained all year, conducting 
17,578 lockings, passing 11,251 commercial vessels, 
52,664 pleasure vessels, and 1,891,889 tons of commerce. 
The fishladder passed more than 150,000 fish and there 
were 1,286,837 project visitors. 
Maintenance, contract: Contracts for the repair of Stoney 
Gate valve #2 ($201,326) and upgrade of the Cavanaugh 
House ($60,878) were completed. Contracts were awarded 
for: fishladder control system, rehabilitation of two mooring 
buoys, and purchase of large lock turnbuckles. 
9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL 
AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public 
Law 86-645 (preauthorization). 
Fiscal year costs were: Nahcotta, WA, $14,025; Neah 
Bay, WA, (under construction); and Tokeland, WA, 
$39,499, a total of $53,524. 
Navigation activities pursuant to Section 111, Public 
Law 90-483 (preauthorization). 
Grays Harbor, Point Chehalis, WA, (work resumed - now 
under construction). 
10. NEAH BAY, WA 
Location. On the southern shore of the Strait of Juan de 
Fuca about 6 miles east of Cape Flattery on the Olympic 
Peninsula, and about 150 miles northwest of Seattle, WA. 
Existing project. Neah Bay is an artificially created 
harbor, authorized by Congress in 1938 to provide a harbor 
of refuge at the mouth of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The 
original project, completed in 1944 by the Corps of Engineers, 
consists of an 8,000-foot-long rubblemound breakwater 
between Waadah Island and the westerly shore of 
Neah Bay, and reinforcement of a rock revetment extending 
approximately 2,200 feet west from Baadah Point. An 
800-foot-long westward extension of the revetment was 
completed in 1956. This breakwater protects both the U. 
S. Coast Guard facilities and the Makah Tribe headquarters 
complex. New work, under authority of Section 107, consists 
of a 1,450-foot-long rubble mound breakwater offshore, 
a 350-foot-long rubblemound breakwater on the 
nearshore,entrance channel authorized to -15 mean lower 
low water (MLLW), a fish mitigation site, and aids to 
navigation. Total estimated cost is $4,847,000 
($3,737,000 Federal and $1,110,000 non-Federal). 
Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, 
the local sponsor (Makah Indian Nation) is responsible 
for 20% of the federally authorized work. A Project 
Cooperation Agreement was executed on May 2, 1995. In 
addition, the Makah Indian Nation has agreed to perform 
100% of the following work: construct a sixteen-acre 
moorage basin with a depth of- 15 MLLW to accommodate 
commercial fishing vessels at all tides; dredge and dispose 
50,000 cy of material for sand blanket and beach nourishment; 
provide moorage facilities to serve 200 commercial 
fishing boats; widen cross section of east rubblemound 
breakwater to provide a work surface approximately 56 feet 
wide; contribute to fish mitigation site; plant native vegetation; 
zone the mitigation beach for restricted use; and 
provide a public education program. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: 
Initiated and completed plans and specifications, executed 
PCA, advertised and awarded construction contract. Project 
is approximately 50% complete. 
New work, contract: Supervised contract for the navigation 
improvements. 
11. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA 
Location. Near southern end of Puget Sound at head of 
Budd Inlet, about 45 miles southwest of Tacoma. (See 
NOAA Survey Chart 18456.) 
Existing project. Provides for a channel between deep 
water in Budd Inlet and port terminal, 30 feet deep at mean 
-38-5-

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL, WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
lower low water and 500 feet wide, with suitable additional 
width at bend; a turning basin adjacent to port terminal 30 
feet deep, 3,350 feet long, and 500 to 960 feet wide;. and 
construction of a 656-foot concrete floating breakwater and 
dredging of the entrance and access channels and turning 
basin, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 
86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in 
Table 38-C (East Bay Small Boat Basin). Extreme tidal 
range is 22.5 feet. Range between mean lower low water 
and mean higher high water is 14.4 feet. Existing project 
was completed in 1985. (For details relating to previous 
projects, see page 1369 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 
1873 of Annual Report for 1938.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Five port facilities are located in 
Olympia at Budd Inlet, exclusive of the numerous waterfront 
facilities in the ports used by recreational craft. The 
industrial docks are used for conventional general cargo, 
logs, timber products and miscellaneous mooring. (See Port 
Series No. 35 - Ports of Tacoma, Olympia, and Grays 
Harbor, WA, revised 1993.) 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Maintained project coordination. Performed continuous 
water quality monitoring at East Bay Marina during the 
seasonal periods of poor water quality. A surface inspection 
of the floating concrete breakwater confirmed the breakwater 
and anchor pile system to be in good condition. 
12. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS 
Hydrographic surveys and inspections to determine navigation 
conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, 
and channels not funded on a project basis for the current 
fiscal year. Soundings and visual inspections in subject 
areas are conducted in order to evaluate shoaling conditions. 
Hydrographic charts are prepared and distributed. 
Fiscal year costs were $116,774. Total costs to date are 
$3,460,693. (See Table 38-I.) 
13. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY 
WATERS, WA 
Location. Puget Sound is in the western part of Washington. 
Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett, Bellingham, 
and many small towns are on its bays and inlets. (See 
NOAA Survey Charts 18440, 18441, and 18448.) 
Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its 
tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in 
cooperation with the U.S. Coast Guard and city of Seattle, 
of floating debris from the Seattle Harbor area. Work consists 
of collecting large pieces of drift, waterlogged pilings, 
logs and other debris considered hazardous to navigation 
from Puget Sound and federally authorized channels. (For 
details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual 
Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 
1938.) 
Local cooperation. None requircd. Cities of Seattle, 
Tacoma, Olympia, Everett and Bcllingham arc cooperating 
in a program for control of floating debris in their harbors 
and setting up collection sites for our debris vessel. 
Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at numerous localities 
on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in 
general, considered adequate for existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
The debris vessel Puget operated continuously 
throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters and removed 
approximately 2,800 tons of floating debris and 
hazards to navigation. Debris was disposed of locally or 
loaded aboard barges and disposed of by contract. Snagging 
operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham 
Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, Everett 
Harbor, Snohomish River (upstream to town of Snohomish), 
Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, 
Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River, and 
Elliott Bay. 
Maintenance, contract: 1,125 tons of harbor debris were 
disposed of at a cost of $104,654. Contractor continues to 
recycle much of the debris, reducing the cost of disposal by 
contract. Remainder of debris is placed in a demolition 
landfill or recycled through other government agencies. 
14. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA 
Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and 
Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows 
westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles 
south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) 
Existing project. Provides for: jetty 15 feet high on 
easterly side of river mouth and a dike on westerly side, 
with a view of stabilizing entrance; channel 10 feet deep 
and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 feet upstream from deep 
water; basin 10 feet deep, 300 to 425 feet wide, and 2,400 
feet long upstream of channel; and, maintenance of an 
ocean spit. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. 
Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high 
water at La Push is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. 
The spit is nourished with dredged material in conjunction 
with channel dredging. The spit was rehabilitated with 
quarry rock in 1974, in 1979-80, and in 1982; in addition, 
a 500-foot breakwater section paralleling the channel and 
extending the spit was constructed - all under O&M authority. 
Project was completed in February 1960. (For further 
details, see Annual Report for 1960.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are 3 privately owned docks 
at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River. There 
is also a protected boat basin owned by the Quileute Tribe 
Port Authority which is used by fishing boats, pleasure 
craft, and the Coast Guard, which has a separate pier. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Condition surveys were made of the river channel. 
Maintenance, contract: A continuing contract was 
awarded in July for maintenance dredging of the river 
mouth, entrance channel and boat basin, and for rock rehabilitation 
of the ocean spit revetment and boat basin training 
wall. 
-38-6-

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
15. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA 
Location. Harbor at Seattle, WA, includes all waterways 
within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an 
arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) 
Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 
34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 
feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay; the 
30-foot by 200-foot wide channel from West Waterway to 
1st Avenue South Bridge, and the 20-foot by 150-foot-wide 
channel from I1st Avenue South Bridge to 8th Avenue; 
dredging Duwamish Waterway 150 feet by 15 feet from 8th 
Avenue to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South 
Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep 
at the upper end of the waterway; maintenance of East 
Waterway between upper end of 750-foot section and 
Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long and 400 feet 
wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway 
at junction of waterways south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. 
Paul & Pacific Railroad bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these 
sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full 
project dimensions. Total length of all waterways included 
in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean 
lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and 
mean higher high water is 11.3 feet. Extreme tidal range is 
19.3 feet. Project was completed in 1931, excluding maintenance 
of East Waterway above the 750-foot section. 
Turning basin, constructed under authority of R&H Act of 
Mar. 3, 1925, in 20-foot deep waterway was deauthorized 
by P.L. 99-662 dated Nov. 17, 1986. (For further details, 
see Annual Report for 1932.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local sponsor 
has no maintenance responsibility. 
Terminal facilities. There are 203 piers, wharves, and 
docks located on the inner and outer harbors at Seattle, WA. 
Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay and Lake Washington 
form the inner harbor; Elliott Bay and East, West and 
Duwamish Waterways form the outer harbor. (Lake Washington 
Ship Canal, a part of the inner harbor, is a separate 
project in this report.) These terminals serve a variety of 
purposes which include cargo handling, bunkering vessels, 
ferry service (vehicular, passenger and rail car), marine 
repair/outfitting/drydocking/conversion, shipbuilding, 
handling supplies and equipment, and mooring company 
owned equipment, excursion vessels, fire boats, fishing 
vessels, government equipment, harbor craft/tugs, and 
oceanographic research vessels. The numerous waterfront 
facilities in the port used exclusively by recreational craft 
are not included. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1993.) 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Condition surveys were made of channels. Sediment 
sampling/testing was performed and engineering/design 
work for FY 96 maintenance dredging was initiated. 
16. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA 
Location. An inland passage, 11 miles long, between 
Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of 
Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA 
Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) 
Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet 
deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to 
deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction 
where necessary; and removal of protecting rocky 
points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation 
at "Hole-in-the-Wall". Plane of reference is mean 
lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and 
mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 
8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme 
tidal range is about 19.5 feet at south end of channel and 
about 16 feet at north end. Project was completed in March 
1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves, docks, and 
piers on Swinomish Channel, all but three of which are 
privately owned. Of these, one is used for handling general 
cargo; five are used exclusively for moorage, unloading and 
servicing of fishing vessels; two are used for handling 
petroleum products; three facilities are used for log dumps; 
and two for handling non-metallic minerals. Three publicly 
owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing 
small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Maintained project coordination with Port of Skagit 
County, Port of Anacortes, U.S. Coast Guard, and navigation 
users. Channel condition surveys were conducted. 
Maintenance, contract: A maintenance dredging contract 
was completed in March at a total cost of $731,435. The 
clean dredged material (99,800 cy) was used beneficially 
by the Port of Anacortes for preload and grading purposes 
at its upland redevelopment site. The Port of Anacortes 
contributed $379,248 for additional rehandling costs to the 
upland site. 
17. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND 
NASELLE RIVER, WA 
Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of 
Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 
miles north of mouth of Columbia River in Washington. 
Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows 
generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River 
enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey 
Chart 18504.) 
Existing project. Provides for: channel over bar at 
mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet 
wide; channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep 
water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, 
thence 300 feet wide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 
feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff 
channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at 
Mailboat Slough; channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide 
up south fork to deep basin above Cram Lumber Mill, and 
up north fork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet 
wide, 350 feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; channel 
10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palix River 
to Bay Center dock, with widening at shoreward end to 
provide a small mooring basin; mooring basin 15 feet deep, 
340 feet wide, and 540 feet long adjacent to port wharf at 
Tokeland; entrance channel at Nahcotta 10 feet deep and 
r 200 feet wide, and mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet 
wide, and 1,150 feet long, protected by a rubblemound 
breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and removal of snags, 
piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of 
-38-7-

RELPO)R 1 OF THE SECRIETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
Naselle River between Naselle and mouth. Project includes 
about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa 
River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River-Bay Center channel, 
and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 
Bridge. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal 
range between mean lower low water and mean higher high 
water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point, 9.9 feet at Raymond, 8.9 feet 
at Bay Center, and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 
18 feet at Toke Point, 19.3 feet at Raymond, 16 feet at Bay 
Center, and 18 feet near Naselle. Project was completed in 
November 1958. (For further details, see Annual Report for 
1959. For details relating to previous projects, see page 968 
of Annual Report for 1910, page 2001 of Annual Report for 
1915, and page 1861 of Annual Report for 1938.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa 
River and Harbor, including 5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay 
Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. 
Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable 
for use by ocean-going vessels. One of these is publicly 
owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and 
one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including 3 
that are publicly owned and operated, are used by shallowdraft 
vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for 
existing commerce. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
The frequency of condition surveys on the Willapa bar 
channel has been increased at the request of the U.S. Coast 
Guard. The alignment of the Willapa bar thalweg continues 
to be a problem for safe navigation. 
Maintenance, contract: A maintenance dredging contract 
for the Bay Center entrance channel was awarded in July. 
Approximately 40,000 cy of shoal materials are to be clamshell 
dredged with open water disposal. 
Beach Erosion Control 
18. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 
103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). 
Fiscal year costs were: Lummi Shore Road, WA, 
$86,677. In addition, $27,011 contributed funds were expended. 
19. LINCOLN PARK BEACH, SEATTLE, WA 
Location. Project is located within the city of Seattle, at 
Williams Point, and adjacent to the East Passage of Puget 
Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18449.) 
Existing project. Initial beach nourishment consisted of 
the placement of 34,000 tons of sand, gravel, and cobble 
fill seaward of the existing seawall, a distance of 2,300 feet 
along the southwest beach. 250 feet of rock revetment, at 
Williams Point, consisting of 2 layers of 1,500-pound to 
4,000-pound armor rock were placed on a 2-foot thick filter 
bed of quarry spalls. The revetment is fronted by 2,000 tons 
of gravel and cobble fill, with the same top elevation, slope 
and seaward extent as the beach nourishment on the southwest 
beach. 
Periodic beach nourishment, consisting of placement of 
beach material to replenish the erosion loss approximately 
every 5 years, is an authorized part of the construction 
project. Monitoring of beach nourishment consists of initial 
and periodic profile surveys, estimates of alongshore/
offshore volumes of material, periodic beach 
sediment sampling, and pre- and post- construction environmental 
monitoring. Initial construction was completed 
in December 1988. 
The first periodic nourishment was performed during 
September-November 1994. 
Local cooperation. Cost sharing requirements for the 
local sponsor (city of Seattle) provides 35% of total project 
cost including the cost of periodic nourishment and surveillance. 
A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on 
June 15, 1988. Amendment No. 1 to the LCA for the 
periodic nourishment and surveillance was executed in 
March 1994.. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: 
Continued post-construction monitoring. 
Flood Control 
20. CHEHALIS RIVER AT SOUTH ABERDEEN 
AND COSMOPOLIS, WA 
Location. The Chehalis River, about 125 miles in length, 
rises in the Willapa Hills in west central Washington, flows 
east, then north and finally west to Grays Harbor on the 
coast. The cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis are located 
at the mouth of the Chehalis River in Grays Harbor County. 
The project is located on the left river bank (south side) in 
Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. (See Geological Survey topographic 
sheet, Aberdeen, WA, 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. The project, authorized in P.L. 99- 
662, as refined in the plans and specifications, will provide 
standard project flood protection for most of the left bank 
flood plain (1,176 acres) at the mouth of the Chehalis River 
in the cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. The improvement 
will include segments of earthen embankment levee 
(2.0 miles) and steel sheet pile floodwall (1.1 miles), joining 
areas of high ground (1.2 miles). The project roughly 
follows the left bank of the Chehalis River from Devonshire 
Slough to Cosmopolis. Tide gates will be provided where 
existing drainage channels cross the project alignment. 
Closure gates will be provided to maintain road and rail 
access through the levee system. Estimated total project 
cost is $14,300,000 ($10,700,000 Federal and $3,600,000 
non-Federal). 
Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, 
the local sponsor (city of Aberdeen assisted by the 
city of Cosmopolis) will pay a minimum of 25% of project 
costs. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed 
March 1, 1994. The local sponsor will provide operation 
and maintenance of the project. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: 
Conducted engineering during construction support for, 
and supervised the construction contract. Local sponsor 
completed land acquisition activities and performed necessary 
relocations. 
-38-8-

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
New work, contract: Construction contract was awarded 
in March in the amount of $6,300,000. The embankment is 
approximately 85% complete and the steel sheetpile floodwall 
is 75% complete. Contract is scheduled for completion 
in December 1996. 
21. FLATHEAD RIVER, NEAR KALISPELL, 
MT
Location. The project lies within northwestern Montana 
in Flathead County. It includes the Flathead River flood 
plain from Badrock Canyon downstream about 40 river 
miles to Flathead Lake. 
Existing project. The project consisted of nonstructural 
work to develop the following products: (1) a flood information 
brochure which alerts flood plain residents to the 
flooding danger within the area; (2) flood information public 
service announcements which can be used by county 
officials and the local media to reinforce the message in the 
brochure; (3) a flood warning map which describes the 
magnitude of flooding in a "phased" approach; and, (4) a 
flood monitoring system (based on the best possible use of 
existing gages and a new upstream gage) which can be used 
to make predictions concerning when the flood will strike 
and how great it will be. All work was completed in 
September 1995, with final fiscal requirements remaining. 
Local cooperation. The local sponsor (Flathead County) 
was responsible for 25% of project costs. A Local Cooperation 
Agreement was executed on September 1, 1994. 
The local sponsor will provide operation and maintenance 
of the project. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: 
Installed new upstream gage, coordinated with local sponsor, 
and supervised contract work. 
New work, contract: Contractor completed the printing 
of maps and brochures. 
22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public 
Law 526,79th Congress as amended (preauthorization). 
Fiscal year costs were: Fox Island at Hale Passage, WA, 
$6,959; Lummi Shore Road, Whatcom County, WA, (under 
construction); Murden Cove, WA, $11,002; Stillaguamish 
River (North Fork), Darrington, WA, (terminated FY 94), 
a total of $17,961. 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public 
Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). 
See Table 38-J. 
Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood 
fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, 
and antecedent legislation.) 
See Table 38-K. 
23. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA 
Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, 
flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 
miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river 
mile 64, 6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and I mile downstream 
from mouth of North Fork. (See Geological Survey 
topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, WA.") 
Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with 
gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1176 feet 
above mean sea level and top of gates at elevation 1206, 
creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. 
Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Project is designed 
to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural 
and urban flood damage, and make possible further 
expansion of Seattle industrial area. It also supplements 
Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. 
Project was completed in June 1963. (For further details, 
see Annual Report for 1963.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance 
was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, ditches, 
powerline, and other project features. Stilling basin inspection 
was accomplished. Work continued on water quality 
and sediment surveys. 
Dam Safety Assurance. New work, hired labor: Completed 
plans and specifications for seismic strengthening of 
outlet works intake tower and bridge. Advertised for contract 
work. 
24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
Inspections are made of federally constructed local flood 
protection projects which are maintained by local interests, 
and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance 
are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal 
year inspections were made on Yakima River at Yakima, 
Okanogan River at Omak and Oroville, and Sammamish 
River in Washington State; Coeur d'Alene, St. Maries, 
Placer Creek, and Lightning Creek projects in Idaho; and, 
Clark Fork River at Missoula in Montana. Fiscal year costs 
were $85,298. Total costs to date have been $1,297,784. 
25. LA CONNER, WA 
Location. The project is located on the eastern bank of 
the Swinomish Slough, in the town of La Conner, about 64 
miles north of Seattle, WA. (See Geological Survey topographic 
sheet, La Conner, WA, 1:24,000.) 
Existing project. The plan of improvement involves 
placement of rock riprap along approximately 1,600 feet of 
the Swinomish Channel bank in the La Conner Historic 
District and the repair of approximately 200 piles. Erosion 
control and repair/ replacement of the damaged piles will 
prevent erosive loss of the existing overwater buildings. 
Cohstruction was started in September 1994. Estimated 
project cost is $1,522,000 ($1,053,000 Federal and 
$469,000 non-Federal). Project is scheduled for fiscal 
-38-9-

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
completion in FY 96. Remaining work includes the preparation 
of an operation and maintenance manual. 
Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, 
the local sponsor (town of La Conner) will pay 25% 
of cost for erosion control measures. A Project Cooperation 
Agreement was executed July 7, 1994. Acquisition of 
lands required for project construction, repair of damaged 
piles and readjustment of existing floats was accomplished 
in FY 94 entirely at local cost. The local sponsor will 
provide operation and maintenance of the project. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: 
Continued engineering during construction support for project 
and completed supervision of equipment rental and 
material supply contracts. 
New work, contract: Construction contracts (equipment 
rental and material supply) were completed in December 
1994. 
26. LUMMI SHORE ROAD, WHATCOM 
COUNTY, WA 
Location. Bellingham Bay is located about 90 miles 
north of Seattle, WA. The project is located along the 
northwest shore of the bay, just west of the mouth of the 
Nooksack River and 8 miles west of the city of Bellingham 
in Whatcom County. 
Existing project. Lummi shore road, an 8-inch sewer 
force main, a sewer lift station, an 8-inch water main, and 
power and phone lines have been threatened from erosion 
of the shoreline. The unprotected bank is receding, and 
without some form of protection severe winter storms could 
erode enough of the bank to require relocation of the road 
and utilities. The shore protection project is a 2,200-foot 
rock revetment consisting of a rock slope and quarry spall 
filter designed to withstand wave energy and to stabilize 
the existing embankment. Construction was completed in 
November 1994, with final fiscal requirements remaining. 
Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, 
the local sponsor (Lummi Indian Nation) is responsible 
for 25% of project costs. A Project Cooperation 
Agreement was executed on July 20, 1994. 
Operations during fiscal year: New work, hired labor: 
Supervised construction contract. 
New work, contract: Completed construction contract. 
27. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA 
Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup 
River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence 
with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of 
Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles upstream and southeast of 
Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east 
of Tacoma. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet "Cedar 
Lake Quadrangle, Washington.") 
Existing project (including dam safety assurance improvements 
to date). Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest 
elevation, rises 432 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage 
capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Flood control 
outlet works are in right abutment and permit controlled 
discharge of 17,600 cubic feet per second through two 
concrete-lined tunnels. Uncontrolled discharge over the 
spillway is maximum capacity for 245,000 cubic feet per 
second. Project affords flood protection to White and Puyallup 
River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district 
in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma 
against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum 
discharge of record. Original project was completed in June 
1953. To date the Corps has constructed two vista areas, a 
picnic area, a wading pool, and playground adjacent to the 
project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and 
fishermen, and a 1,760-foot trail leading to the lower vista 
area. Installation of an approximately 400-foot-deep concrete 
cutoff wall in the core of the dam was completed in 
November 1990 under the major rehabilitation program. 
Under dam safety assurance in FY 1991, spillway walls 
were raised, the dam crest was heightened, and river diversion 
facilities required for excavation for the new tower 
were completed. (For further details, see Annual Report 
for 1991.) 
Improved project. The current construction involves 
refurbishing both the 9-foot diameter and the 23-foot diameter 
tunnels and construction of a new reservoir outlet 
tower to serve as an intake for both tunnels. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Project features were operated all year. Maintenance 
was accomplished on dam facilities, intake structure, 
gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, hiking 
trails, vista observation deck, recreation area, and fish facilities. 
Approximately 4,873 fish were transported from 
the fish collection facility to the upstream release point. 
Dam Safety Assurance. New work, hired labor: Supervision 
and inspection of the construction contract. Continued 
engineering during construction support for the new 
reservoir outlet tower and tunnel modifications. Work is 
scheduled for completion in FY 1996. 
New work, contract: Work on the contract for construction 
of a new reservoir outlet tower continued. 
28. SAMMAMISH RIVER RESTORATION, WA 
Location. Originates at northern end of Sammamish 
Lake, 11 miles east of Seattle, WA, and flows northwesterly 
15 miles to northern end of Lake Washington, which forms 
eastern boundary of Seattle. (See Geological Survey quadrangles 
Bothell, Kirkland, Redmond, and Edmonds, East.) 
Existing project. Project was constructed by the Corps 
of Engineers in 1965. It provided for major drainage improvement 
and partial flood protection by enlarging the 
river channel from Sammamish Lake to Lake Washington, 
increasing depths an average of 5 feet, and increasing 
widths from an average of about 15 feet to a range of 32 to 
50 feet. Modifications to the authorized project were made 
tinder authority of Section 1135 and consist of construction 
of low flow habitat features, planting of selected trees and 
shrubs, mechanical removal and regrading of embankment 
materials, and hydroseeding. All work was physically 
completed in November 1994, with final fiscal requirements 
remaining. 
-38-10-

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requireents, 
the local sponsor (King County) was responsible for 
;% of project costs. A Local Cooperation Agreement was 
,ecuted on December 23, 1993 for the Section 1135 pro- 
Ct. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: 
ipervised construction contract. 
New work, contract: Construction work was accomished 
by equipment rental. 
9. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL 
,ESERVOIR OPERATIONS 
Flood control storage space was available in Hungry 
orse Reservoir, MT, Flathead Lake, MT (controlled by 
err Dam), Grand Coulee project, WA, Wynoochee Dam, 
IA, Upper Baker and Ross Reservoirs, WA. Issues relattg 
to project operations were addressed. Regulation inructions 
were provided for flood control operations. 
uidance forecasts were made during the flood control 
ason, as required. No Lost Valley storage replacement 
as requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells 
>ams. Daily and/or hourly data were collected and tabuted 
as required to check compliance with operating critea. 
Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of 
:servoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year 
ith agencies responsible for the operation of these procts. 
Fiscal year costs were $437,381. Total costs to date 
ave been $3,906,658. 
0. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA 
Location. Formed by confluence of its north and south 
)rks at Arlington, in northwestern Washington, Stiliguamish 
River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, 
atering Port Susan through Hat Slough and South Pass, 
arid Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey 
'hart 18441, and Geological Survey Quadrangles Stan- 
-ood, Marysville, and Stillaguamish, WA.) 
Existing project. Works to reduce bank erosion and 
hannel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 miles between 
lrlington and head of Hat Slough, and on Cook Slough, 3 
niles long, as follows: revetment at 26 places on river and 
;ook Slough; concrete weir (including a fishway) 275 feet 
ong between steel sheet pile piers at head of Cook Slough 
o limit flow through slough; and two cutoff channels, each 
bout 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook 
;lough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into im- 
)roved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above low water at 
Cook Slough weir have been observed. Project was com- 
)leted in July 1939. (For further details, see Annual Report 
or 1940.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired la- 
)or: Utilized in-house labor to supervise removal of brush 
rom the entire project along slopes of levee. 
Maintenance, contract: Awarded equipment rental conracts 
to achieve removal of brush. 
31. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA. 
Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on 
western slopes of Mount Rainier, flows northwesterly 50 
miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of 
Puget Sound, at Tacoma, WA. Work covered by this project 
is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See 
NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) 
Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 
cubic feet per second between East 11 th Street Bridge and 
lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 
2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting 
channel and levees, and making necessary bridge 
changes. The 11th Street Bridge at lower end of project is 
0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal 
range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 
feet. Project was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain 
Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 
percent greater than maximum discharge of record. A real 
estate design memorandum, approved by Office of the 
Chief of Engineers on October 2, 1985, changed the project 
boundary to allow the Port of Tacoma to create a wetland 
adjacent to the project. This action resulted in the Corps 
acquiring approximately 2,450 linear feet of setback levee 
in fee simple. Maintenance funds to cover the increased 
length of the project have been provided by the Port of 
Tacoma for the project life. Project was completed in May 
1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Utilized in-house labor to supervise removal of brush 
and noxious weeds from the entire project along slopes of 
levee. Coordinated annual clean-up with Citizens for a 
Healthy Bay, a tax-exempt, nonprofit organization. 
Maintenance, contract: Awarded equipment rental contracts 
to achieve removal of brush and noxious weeds. 
Multiple-Purpose with Power 
32. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID 
Location. On Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of 
Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of 
Spokane, WA. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from 
mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. 
(See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, ID, 
and Newport, WA.) 
Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric 
power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a 
part of the multiple-purpose plan for development of Columbia 
River Basin, including recreation development. At 
the dam, the river channel was formerly divided by an 
island and a low waterfall of about 7 feet. Dam is a gated, 
gravity-structure spillway in left channel and a powerhouse 
having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, 
creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 
1,153,000 acre-feet. Project was completed in June 1957. 
(For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreational 
facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni 
Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, Trestle 
Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy Point. (Strongs Island 
-38-11-

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
was closed in FY 1982 to reduce O&M costs.) (Refer to 
Albeni Falls Master Plan dated June 1981 for further 
planned development.) 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of 
storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and 
electrical maintenance was performed on spillways, dam, 
powerhouse, and equipment. 
Maintenance, contract: Continuing contracts: replace 
annunciator system, protective generator relays and switchboard 
panels, standby generator, and paint and refurbish 
cranes. Completed contracts: powerhouse emergency ingress 
($132,180), Clark Fork debris control facility (pile 
replacement) ($154,617), Clark Fork debris control facility 
(breakwater) ($165,000), and bridge crane collector and 
remote control ($91,320). Contracts were awarded for: 
replacement of visitor center, powerhouse HVAC renovation, 
and transformer blast and oil containment. 
33. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS 
LAKE, WA 
Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, 
at River Mile 545, just upstream from mouth of Foster 
Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from town of Bridgeport. (Geological 
Survey topographic sheet, Okanogan, WA, shows 
general locality.) 
Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which 
consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. 
The powerhouse has sixteen 88,274 kilowatt and eleven 
95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 
2,457,384 kilowatts. Work was completed to bring turbine 
efficiency for units 17-27 up to design standards. Estimated 
cost of current construction project is $395,800,000, with 
completion scheduled for FY 1996. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: 
Initiated deficiency correction of the data acquisition and 
control system. 
New work, contract: The orthographic shoreline mapping 
contract was completed. A contract for non-overflow 
section reinforcement was awarded. 
Maintenance, hired labor: Project was operated all year, 
and routine maintenance work was performed. 
Maintenance, contract: The contract for joint seal replacement 
for elevation 970 roadway continued. Completed 
contracts: 250V battery replacement ($88,744), 
repair transformer ($687,825), and powerhouse sump pump 
($26,415). Contracts were awarded for: ss annunciation 
system, powerhouse HVAC system (phase II), and water 
connection w/town of Bridgeport. 
34. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT 
Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, MT, 
about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream 
from confluence of Kootenai and Columbia Rivers. 
(See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson 
Lakes, MT.) 
Existing project. Provides storage for local flood control 
protection in Montana and Idaho, and main stem flood 
control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation 
at-site and at downstream plants through storage 
release. Project is operated as a unit of a comprehensive 
system for improvement of Columbia River basin for flood 
control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa Project. Dam is a 
straight concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 
3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2459 feet 
above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed 
capacity of 420,000 kilowatts from four hydroelectric generating 
units. A fifth generating unit was completed in 
1984 with an additional capacity of 105,000 kilowatts, and 
there is a capability for installation of three additional 
units. Lake Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 
miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 
4,965,000 acre-feet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction 
of dam was in accordance with a treaty between United 
States and Canada relating to international cooperation in 
water resource development of the Columbia River basin. 
Construction is complete. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: 
Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of 
storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and 
electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam, 
powerhouse, and equipment. 
Maintenance, contract: The contract for unit #3 stator 
rewind continued. Completed contracts: joint sealant replacement 
and concrete repair ($557,992) and gate 
guide/sluice liner corrosion repair ($1,688,475). Contracts 
were awarded for: penstock gate lifting beam, powerhouse 
elevator modification, and haul road bridge pier removal. 
Libby Additional Units Project. Provides for installation 
of 4 additional units at the Libby Dam powerhouse. 
Fabrication of generators for units 5 through 8 is completed; 
however, only the unit 5 generator was installed. 
Installation of the electrical equipment was limited to unit 
5. Parts for units 6 through 8 have been stored at the site. 
Project is completed with units I through 5 operational. 
Units 6 through 8 have been reclassified inactive. 
Operations during fiscal year. None. 
Libby Reregulating Dam Project. Provides for construction 
of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream 
of Libby Dam and associated relocation of about 9 miles of 
Burlington Northern Railroad, 7.5 miles of St. Regis log 
haul road, 0.5 mile of Forest Development Road, and 7.5 
miles of Montana State Highway. Funds were provided for 
a construction start in 1977; however, courts have found 
that Congress did not authorize construction of the reregulating 
dam. 
Operations during fiscal year. In FY 1982, all work was 
terminated due to court direction. 
Libby Reregulating Dam - Power Units Project. Provides 
for installation of three hydroelectric generating units 
-38-12-

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
at the reregulating dam with 78,900 kilowatt installed capacity. 
A General Design Memorandum 1, Phase II, Preliminary 
Design Report was approved by the Office, Chief 
of Engineers on March 3, 1981. 
Miscellaneous 
35. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 
(Section 1135, Public Law 99-662). 
Fiscal year costs were: Coordination Account Funds, 
$599; Howard Hanson Dam Anadromous Fish and Wildlife 
Restoration, WA, $11,330; Initial Appraisals, General, 
$17,632; Kootenai River Pond, MT, $58,597; Thornton 
Creek, WA, $2,077; and Wynoochee Anadromous Fish 
Restoration, WA, $39,931, a total of $130,166. 
Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89- 
298). 
The program consists of control measures for selected 
water bodies currently infested with Eurasian watermilfoil 
and measures to prevent its spread into uninfested waters. 
Major operations under the cost share program included 
mechanical harvesting of 27 acres, maintaining 6 acres of 
fiberglass bottom screens at Lake Washington, Lake Union 
and Lake Sammamish, WA; follow up to the chemical 
treatment of 82 acres with the aquatic herbicide fluridone 
in Long Lake, WA (inspection, diver-hand-pulling, bottom 
barriers); rotovating 100+ acres at Pend Oreille River, WA; 
harvesting approximately 70 acres at Columbia River, WA; 
follow up (inspection, diver-hand-pulling, bottom barriers) 
to the chemical treatment of 240 acres at Swofford Pond, 
WA, and 20 acres at Carlisle Lake, WA, with the aquatic 
herbicide fluridone. The FY 1995 work also included treatment 
effectiveness and carryover studies, aquatic plant surveys, 
and public information efforts. Total costs for the 
fiscal year were $155,207. 
General Investigations 
36. SURVEYS 
Fiscal year costs were $180,371 for navigation studies, 
$6,153 for flood damage prevention studies, $90,989 for 
special studies, $454,900 for review of authorized projects, 
$182,291 for miscellaneous activities, and $123,763 for 
coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, 
a total of $1,038,467. In addition, contributed funds were 
expended for the following: $77,634 for special studies, 
$401,647 for review of authorized projects, and $75,833 for 
coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, 
a total of $555,114. 
37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC 
DATA 
The work programmed for collection and study of basic 
data covers international water studies, flood plain management 
services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international 
water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage 
computations to determine compliance of West 
Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International 
Joint Commission, and coordination with International 
Kootenay Lake and Osoyoos Lake Boards of Control in 
enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. 
Technical assistance was provided other Federal and non- 
Federal agencies and Indian tribes in flood hazard evaluation, 
flood reduction methods, and related services as 
requested. Fiscal year costs were $4,799 for international 
water studies, $126,862 for flood plain management services, 
and $7,128 for hydrologic studies, a total of $138,789. 
In addition, $26,082 contributed funds were expended for 
flood plain management services. 
38. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 
AND DESIGN 
Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, WA 
Total costs to date have been $1,310,000, including 
$300,000 appropriated and expended under Section 101(c). 
Project is inactive. For last full report see Annual Report 
for FY 1989. 
Centralia, WA 
Total costs to date have been $1,543,000. Project is 
inactive. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 
1993. 
Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, 
WA
Total costs to date have been $2,706,000, $2,212,000 of 
which is now included in the Cost and Financial Statement 
of this report. Construction commenced in FY 1994. For 
last full report see Annual Report for FY 1993. 
East, West and Duwamish Waterways, Seattle 
Harbor, WA 
Total costs to date have been $663,000. Project has been 
deferred. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 
1988. 
Grays Harbor, Chehalis and Hoquiam Rivers, WA 
Total costs to date have been $5,670,000, $3,530,000 of 
which is now included in Cost and Financial Statement of 
this report. Project improvement by construction commenced 
in FY 1990. For last full report see Annual Report 
for FY 1989. 
La Conner, WA 
Total costs to date have beeen $183,000 which is now 
included in the Cost and Financial Statement of this report. 
Construction commenced in FY 1994. For last full report 
see Annual Report for FY 1993. 
Yakima River at Union Gap, WA 
Total costs to date have been $502,000. Project has been 
deferred. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 
1988. 
-38-13-

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total To 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
1. Anacortes Harbor, 
WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
2. Bellingham Harbor, 
WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
3. Everett Harbor and 
Snohomish River, 
WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
4. Friday Harbor, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
7,000 
6,482 
_ 20,000 
44 18,092 
20,000 
22,383 
222,345 
222,345 1 
1,196,499 
1,196,499 
_ 59,524 
_ 59,524 
_ 5,000 
_ 5,000 
_ 1,566,839 
- 1,566,839 2 
617,000 
432,040 
_ 103,000 407,000 
189,025 31,250 458,296 
2,783,256 
2,761,941 3 
_ 29,421 
_ 29,421 
_ 9,103 
_ 9,103 
_ 1,723,745 
- 1,723,745 4 
816,000 516,000 966,000 173,000 
669,147 714,068 1,002,982 185,613 
45,000 
32,643 12,847 
6,000 
3,791 1,443 
13,094,807 
13,093,631 5 
116,618 
116,618 
584,090 
584,090 
1,575,500 
1,575,500 6 
79,952 
79,122 
1,267,881 
1,267,881 
-38-14-

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
TABLE 38-A 
(Continued) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total To 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
5. Grays Harbor and 
Chehalis River, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
6. Grays Harbor, 
Point Chehalis, WA 
7. Lake Crockett, WA 
8. Lake Washington 
Ship Canal, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
10. Neah Bay, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Minor Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
2,318,000 170,000 1,954,000 -1,393,000 
1,622,158 1,057,753 447,801 150,878 
7,754,000 5,501,500 10,270,500 5,750,682 
7,802,000 5,356,103 9,945,041 6,030,289 
22,198,962 
22,148,456 7 
124,772,023 
124,512,227 8 
_ 9,592 
_ 9,592 9 
_ 4,606,145 
_ 4,606,145 
571,000 336,000 150,000 
502,831 372,980 146,698 
50,000 
16,204 
10,000 
41,995 
28,000 
47,403 
_ 440,000 
1,801 426,099 
6,042,000 
6,025,759 10 
55,889 
55,889 
500,000 
486,099 
377,990 
377,990 11 
69,614 159,000 
15,674 212,926 
15,000 
8,848 1,822 
948,754 
944,281 
_ 4,611,436 
_ 4,611,436 12 
6,393,000 4,960,000 5,790,000 5,408,000 
6,135,650 5,208,861 5,618,589 5,739,774 
107,840,737 
107,717,432 13 
_ 7,465,230 
_ 7,465,230 
_ 250,000 
_ 250,000 
78,000 193,000 37,400 1,630,000 
82,255 183,690 46,485 1,425,807 
_ 88,000 52,000 266,000 
_ 72,379 67,584 133,636 
2,011,400 
1,803,200 
406,000 
273,599 
-38-15-

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 38-A 
(Continued) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total To 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
11. Olympia Harbor, WA 
13. Puget Sound and its 
Tributary Waters, WA 
14. Quillayute River, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
15. Seattle Harbor, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
16. Swinomish Channel, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
10,400 
6,633 3,795 
5,000 
3,941 
4,000 
4,396 
337,709 
337,709 14 
768,177 
767,503 15 
43,337 
43,337 
890,000 864,000 965,000 878,000 
857,511 915,433 915,665 928,152 
520,000 
-325 520,348 
50,000 824,000 
44,449 821,057 
23,017,750 
23,006,776 16 
521,850 
521,850 17 
12,413,308 
12,404,205 
20,000 
20,000 
170,335 
170,335 
681,000 132,000 452,500 152,000 
684,210 136,650 436,566 132,759 
41,595 
41,595 
10,093,373 
10,056,305 
69,333 
69,333 
96,595 
94,475 
35,000 
_ 32,880 
34,412 31,000 191,000 415,000 
34,450 30,084 117,755 487,395 
S_ 379,248 
_ - 379,248 
808,332 
808,332 18 
8,059,972 
8,058,160 
32,000 
32,000 
379,248 
379,248 
-38-16-

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
TABLE 38-A 
(Continued) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total To 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
17. Willapa River and Harbor 
and Naselle River, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
19. Lincoln Park Beach, 
Seattle, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
20. Chehalis River at South 
Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
21. Flathead River, near Kalispell 
MT 
(Contrib. Funds) 
23. Howard A. Hanson 
Dam, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
25. La Conner, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
26. Lummi Shore Road, 
Whatcom County, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
_ 1,386,955 
_ 1,386,955 19 
52,640 521,000 77,000 457,624 
48,240 525,283 62,602 449,853 
14,910,360 
14,887,956 20 
78,372 
78,372 21 
_ 165,000 
17,724 128,372 1,185 
_ 136,000 
_ 97,048 
40,000 
66,123 
25,625 
600,000 556,000 1,292,000 2,559,000 
392,502 619,736 573,841 2,505,057 
_ _ _ 1,183,907 
_ _ _ 851,504 
12,620 
17,000 22,000 
17,013 16,283 
27,000 
28,180 
_ _ 15,000 
_ _ _ 13,467 
_ _ 60,000 300,000 
_ _ 12,424 260,299 
842,000 1,364,000 947,000 969,000 
717,555 1,467,604 1,033,691 963,819 
_ _ _ 13,700 
60,000 
47,209 
_ 870,000 
38,446 364,036 
_ 319,000 
_ 74,412 
466,581 
106,381 
_ 20,000 25,000 447,500 
_ 19,627 25,359 436,961 
_ _ _ 134,772 
_ _ _ 134,772 
927,500 
916,434 
405,474 
392,147 
6,063,000 
5,074,169 22 
1,183,907 
851,504 
86,000 
81,463 
15,000 
13,467 
37,408,061 23 
37,320,784 24 
17,239,651 
17,205,250 25 
2,013,700 
2,000,000 
1,053,000 
1,004,371 26 
319,000 
180,793 
492,500 
481,947 
134,772 
134,772 
-38-17-

REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
(Continued) 
See 
Section Total To 
In Text Project Funding FY 92 FY93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
27. Mud Mountain 
Dam, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
28. Sammamish River Restoration 
WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
30. Stillaguamish River, WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
31. Tacoma, Puyallup River, 
WA 
(Federal Funds) 
(Contrib. Funds) 
32. Albeni Falls Dam, ID 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Minor Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
6,913,000 13,7 10,000 18,811,000 7,609,000 
6,841,950 13,748,724 17,904,166 7,212,186 
1,384,000 1,732,000 1,629,000 1,763,318 
1,390,453 1,688,446 1,630,929 1,846, 166 
274,000 
409,294 
81,569,848 27 
80,079,550 28 
30,249,316 
30,192,360 29 
285,908 
285,908 
_ 30,437,500 
12,468 _ 30,437,500 
3,928 
3,928 
30,000 
29,822 
_ 280,000 
178 276,046 
_ 70,000 
_ 64,782 
20,000 
15,244 
4,750 
330,000 
321,290 
70,000 
69,532 
134,595 
134,595 30 
317,000 145,000 161,000 156,000 
325,245 141,954 137,861 181,145 
3,021,524 
3,020,124 
_ 21,000 
_ 21,000 
_ 3,947,853 
_ 3,947,853 31 
33,000 48,000 62,000 
35,646 47,984 61,270 
329 
59,000 
59,947 
871,367 
871,304 
_ 54,405 
_ 7,336 
_- 31,741,561 
_ 31,741,561 32 
3,728,000 5,019,000 4,949,700 5,595,000 
3,642,283 5,040,072 4,809,100 5,767,752 
64,752,470 33 
64,612,328 34 
-38-18-

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
TABLE 38-A 
(Continued) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total To 
In Text Project Funding ; FY 92 FY93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep. 30, 1995 
33. Chief Joseph Dam- New Work 
Rufus Woods Lake, WA Approp. 1,570,000 1,999,000 1,954,000 -278,000 540,094,235 35 
Cost 2,031,600 1,359,623 1,233,919 711,438 539,481,337 36 
Maint. 
Approp. 10,009,000 10,254,000 12,186,000 10,361,000 159,309,538 37 
Cost 10,010,518 10,072,390 12,324,159 10,533,162 159,114,583 38 
Major Rehab. 
Approp. _ _ 297,630 
Cost _ _. 297,630 
34. Libby Dam - Lake New Work 
Koocanusa, MT Approp._ _ _ 543,726,140 
(Federal Funds) Cost 60 _ _ _ 543,726,140 39 
Maint. 
Approp. 4,405,000 4,674,000 8,809,700 5,755,000 68,565,702 40 
Cost 4,318,921 4,729,051 6,099,356 8,426,342 68,284,103 41 
(Contrib. Funds) New Work 
Contrib. _ _ _ 1,458,252 
Cost _. 1,458,252 42 
1. Excludes $2,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 
2. Includes $56,582 appropriated and expended for previous project. 
Excludes $13,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 
3. Includes $1,092 appropriated and expended for previous 
project. 
4. Includes $418,209 appropriated and expended for previous 
project. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 
5. Includes $5,869 appropriated and expended for previous 
project. 
6. Includes $1,180,500 expended under Productive Employment 
Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L.98-8). 
7. Includes $3,530,000 for Preconstruction Engineering 
and Design, $124,945 for recreation facilities at completed project 
(Code 710) and :$ 113,134 for previous project, appropriated and 
expended. Excludes $161,909 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard 
funds. 
8. Includes $37,415 appropriated and expended for previous project. 
Excludes $409,660 Emergency Relief funds and $57,000 
Public Works Administration funds expended. 
9. Excludes $111,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds 
expended. 
10. Excludes $3,418,000 contributed by Port of Grays harbor in 
fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 
I . Includes $117,750 appropriated and expended for recreation 
facilities at completed project (Code 710). 
12. Includes $779,655 for recreation facilities at completed project 
(Code 710), and $485,002 for previous project, appropriated 
and expended. Excludes $246,567 expended by State of Washington 
and $742,071 expended by King County. Excludes $192,516 
Public Works Administration funds expended. 
13. Includes $1,631,195 (1916 to 1936) and $338,163 
subsequently appropriated and expended under Maintenance and 
Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 
14. Includes $183,257 appropriated and expended for previous 
projects. Excludes $105,467 Public Works Administration funds 
expended. 
15. Includes $14,418 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 
16. Includes $64,996 appropriated and expended for previous project. 
17. Excludes Navy funds expended on dredging river channel in 
1944 and Coast Guard funds expended for channel dredging in 1948 
and 1949. 
18. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 
19. Includes $228,084 appropriated and expended for previous 
projects. Excludes $40,000 Coast Guard funds and $192,314 
Emergency Relief funds expended. 
20. Includes $309,177 appropriated and expended for previous 
projects. Excludes $78,532 Public Works Administration funds 
expended. 
21. Includes $6,597 expended for previous projects. 
22. Includes $2,212,000 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, 
appropriated and expended. 
23. Includes $37,048,061 appropriated for original project and 
$360,000 appropriated for Dam Safety Assurance. 
24. Includes $37,048,061 expended for original project and 
$272,723 expended for Dam Safety Assurance. 
25. Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance 
and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable 
Waters. 
26. Includes $183,000 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, 
appropriated and expended. 
27. Includes $13,183,063 appropriated for original project, 
$87,785 appropriated for recreation facilities at completed project 
(Code 710) and $68,300,000 for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes 
$26,000 Emergency Relief funds. 
-38-19-

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
28. Includes $13,182,063 expended for original project, $87,785 
expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710 and 
$66,809,702 for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency 
Relief funds expended. 
29. Includes $198,578 appropriated and expended under Maintenance 
and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable 
Waters. 
30. Excludes $281,000 Works Progress Administration funds and 
$85,999 Emergency Relief funds expended. 
31. Includes $5,035 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities 
at completed project (Code 710). 
32. Includes $30,769,614 for original project and $971,947 for 
recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), appropriated and 
expended. Excludes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act funds 
expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 
33. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($63,384,674), 
Special Recreation Use Fees ($174,776), and Maintenance and 
Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters 
($1,193,020). 
34. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($63,244,532), 
Special Recreation Use Fees ($174,776), and Maintenance and Operation 
of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters 
($1,193,020). 
35. Includes $144,338,252 appropriated for original project, 
$395,608,000 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities 
at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works 
Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project 
(Code 710). 
36. Includes $144,338,252 expended for original project, 
$394,995,102 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities 
at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public 
Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed 
project (Code 710).. 
37. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($158,534,977) 
and Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of 
Navigable Waters ($774,561). 
38. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($158,340,022) and 
Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of 
Navigable Waters ($774,561). 
39. Includes $484,753,143 appropriated and expended for original 
project, $42,221,634 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating 
dam, and $475,000 for power planning.. 
40. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($67,125,378) and 
Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of 
Navigable Waters ($1,440,324). 
41. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($66,843,779) and 
Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of 
Navigable Waters ($1,440,324). 
42. Excludes $161,849 expended by Federal Aviation Agency, 
$32,000 expended by Lincoln County- City of Libby Joint Airport 
Board, $8,000 expended by Bonneville Power Administration, and 
$379,555 expended by U.S. Forest Service. 
-38-20-

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Sep. 3, 1954 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
June 25, 1910 
July 3, 1930 
Aug. 26, 1937 
Sep. 3, 1954 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
July 3, 1958 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
June 25, 1910 
July 3, 1930 
June 20, 1938 
Sep. 3, 1954 
July 14, 1960 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
June 3, 1896 
Mar. 2, 1907 
Mar. 2, 1907 
June 25, 1910 
June 25, 1910 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Jan. 21, 1927 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Dec. 22, 1944 
as amended 
ANACORTES HARBOR, WA 
Channel in Capsante Waterway. 
Mooring Basin. 
Navigation Channel. 
BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA 
Whatcom Creek Waterway 26- and 18-foot channels.' 
Entrance channel In Squalicum Creek Waterway. 
Maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of 
Squalicum Creek Basin. 
Small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway. 
Whatcom Creek Waterway, 30-Foot Channel. 
Channel 3,200 Feet Long, 100 Feet Wide, And 18 Feet Deep 
In I&J Street Waterway. 
EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA 
Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at 
outlet of old river channel. 
Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen 
gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and 
channel to gap. 
Abandon project for Snohomish River and provide settling 
basin near 14h Street. 
Spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of 
river outlet, enlarge channel to 14h Street, and deepen 
settling basin. 
Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel 
to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within 
upper channel reach. 
FRIDAY HARBOR, WA 
Construction of 1,600 feet of concrete floating breakwater. 
GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA 
South jetty. 
A north jetty 9,000 feet long. 
The 18-foot channel. 
Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty 
fixed at 13,734 feet. 
A 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis. 
Dredging in bar channel. 
Dredging in bar channel. 
Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of 
16 feet above mean lower low water. 
Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authorized 
by Public Works Administration Dec. 11, 1933) and 
combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance and 
Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under 
a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation 
facilities. 
1. 
-38-21- 
TABLE 38-B 
H. Doc. 1117, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 
S. Doc. 102, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. 
Sec. 107, P.L.86-645. 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers 
Dec. 31, 1974. 
H. Doc. 1161, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 187, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 70, 74th Cong., I1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 558, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 
Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. 
Authorized By Chief of Engineers 
Feb. 10, 1976. 
S. Doc. 46, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. 
Authorized By Chief of Engineers 
May 5, 1965. 
H. Doc. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 546, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. 
H. Doc. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. 
Authorized By Chief of Engineers 
July 9, 1981. 
Annual Report, 1895, pp. 3517-3533. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 2, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 507, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 125, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 1729, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 582, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc.2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 53, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 
P.L. 78-534 
3. 
4. 
5.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Mar. 2, 1945 
June 30, 1948 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Sep. 3, 1954 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Aug. 13, 1968 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Dec. 22, 1944 
as amended 
July 14,1960 
June 25, 1910 
Mar. 4, 1913 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Sep. 22, 1922 
June 26, 1934 1 
Aug. 30, 1935 2 
Dec. 22, 1944 
as amended 
July 24, 1956 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
Jan. 21, 1927 
July 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Grays 
Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal 
which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. 
14-foot channel to Bay City; breakwater at Westhaven; 
protection of Point Chehalis; and maintenance of Westhaven 
entrance channel. 
Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and 
turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. 
Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. 
Westhaven Cove small boat basin. 
Improve project features with accompanying fish mitigation. 
Modify existing railroad bridge. 
GRAYS HARBOR, POINT CHEHALIS, WA 
Periodic beach nourishment to protect the infrastructure of the 
community of Westport. 
LAKE CROCKETT, WA 
Small-boat basin. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of 
recreation facilities. 
Change authorized channel depth from -18 mean lower low 
water to -25 mean lower low water by dredging. 
LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA 
Provides for a double lock and fixed dam with gated 
spillway and necessary accessory works at entrance to 
Salmon Bay; dredging a channel from locks to deep water 
in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of 
a channel from locks into Lake Washington. 
Dredging below locks and revetting canal banks. 
Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound 
and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. 
Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with 
funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers 
and Harbors. 
Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation 
facilities. 
Government Locks to be known as Hiram M. Chittenden 
Locks. 
NEAII BAY, WA 
Construct approximately 1,800 feet of breakwater to 
provide protection for a commercial fishery marina 
to be constructed by sponsor. 
OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA 
Channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide. 
Increase channel to 26-foot depth on east side of harbor. 
Elimination from project of 12-foot channel on east and 
west sides of harbor, and for a channel 30 feet deep and 
300 feet wide between Budd Inlet and port terminal, 
with turning basin of same depth. 
Report in Office, Chief of Engineers 
H. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 30, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Sec. 107, P.L.86-645. 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers, 
Feb. 7, 1 979. 
P.L. 99-662 
Sec. 111, P.L.90-483 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers 
Sep. 7, 1995 
H. Doc. 303, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 
P.L. 78-534 
Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers, 
Nov. 7, 1988. 
H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., Ist Sess. 
H. Doc. 800, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H. Doc. 140, 72d Cong., I1st Sess. 
P.L. 78-534 
P.L. 84-779 
Sec. 107, P.L.86-645 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers 
June 29, 1995. 
H. Doc. 244, 69th Cong. 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 5, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 21,73rd Cong., 2d Sess. 
-38-22- 
TABLE 38-B 
(Continued) 
7. 
8. 
10. 
11.

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
(Continued) 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Aug. 26, 1937 
July 14, 1960 
as amended 
July 13, 1892 
July 3, 1930 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Mar. 2, 1919 
Mar. 3, 1925 
July 3, 1930 
Aug. 30, 1935 
July 13, 1892 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Oct. 23, 1962 
July 27, 1916 
Aug. 30, 1935 2 
Aug. 30, 1935 4 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Oct. 23, 1962 
as amended 
20. 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Widen outer portion of channel to 500 feet, and widen 
entrance to turning basin. 
656-foot concrete floating breakwater and dredging 
of entrance and access channels and turning basin. 
Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 75, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Sec. 107, P.L.86-645. 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers 
May 13, 1981. 
13. 
CHEHALIS RIVER AT SOUTH ABERDEEN AND 
COSMOPOLIS, WA 
Construction of storm damage and high tide reduction/ 
interior drainage dike, a 4.2-mile levee and tide gate system. 
P.L. 99-662. 
-38-23- 
PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA 
Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by Annual Report for 1893, page 3425 
snagging and dredging; and removal of floating debris 
from Seattle Harbor. 
QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA 
Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a dike on H. Doc. 125, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. 
westerly side, to stabilize entrance. 
Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet deep H. Doc. 218, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. 
and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. 
Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet H. Doc. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess 
long; moorage basin. 3 
SEATTLE HARBOR, WA 
Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide S. Doc. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. 
and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep 
and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. 
Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway. H. Doc. 108, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. 
H. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. 
Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section H. Doc. 211, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 
and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East 
and Duwamish Waterways. 
SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA 
Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike H. Doc. 31, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. and 
construction. Annual Report for 1892, p. 2752 
Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". H. Doc. 499, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 
WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA 
Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide, in Willapa River, and H. Doc. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. 
150 feet wide in the forks. 
Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet Rivers and Harbors Committee 
and minimum width of 500 feet. Doc. 41, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 
For cutoff channel at Narrows. Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 37, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. 
Channel from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock. H. Doc. 481, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between H. Doc. 425, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 
South Bend and the forks; Tokeland and Nahcotta basins; 
and Naselle River clearance. 
LINCOLN PARK BEACH, SEATTLE, WA 
250-foot rock revetment and 2,550 feet of sand and gravel Sec. 103, P.L. 87-874. 
nourishment. Periodic monitoring and replenishing beach Authorized by Chief of Engineers 
nourishment. Oct. 18, 1983 
14. 
15. 
16. 
17. 
19.

REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
FLATHEAD RIVER, NEAR KALISPELL, MT 
Nonstructural work to produce a flood monitoring system. 
HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA 
Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. 
Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam. 
LA CONNER, WA 
Stabilize bank to prevent deterioration and destruction 
of historical, overwater buildings. 
LUMMI SHORE ROAD, WHATCOM 
COUNTY, WA 
Shore protection to prevent road and utilities from erosion 
due to winter storms. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of 
recreation facilities. 
SAMMAMISH RIVER RESTORATION, WA 
Restore fish habitat by providing in-stream wildlife 
facilities and predator protection. 
STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA 
Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank revetment 
at 26 places; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; 
and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. 
Maintedance of improvements. 
TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA 
Channel improvement to protect people and industrial 
section of city of Tacoma. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of 
recreation facilities. 
ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID 
Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of 
recreation facilities. 
CHIEF JOSEPHII DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA 
Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River 
at Foster Creek. 
Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. 
Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of 
recreation facilities. 
School facilities for education of dependents of 
construction personnel. 
Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858. 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers 
April 8, 1994. 
H. Doc. 271, 81st Cong., lst Sess. 
P.L. 85-592 
P.L. 99-662 
Sec. 14, P.L.79-526 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers 
Oct. 24, 1994 
S. Committee Print, 
Puyallup River, WA, 
74th Cong., 2d Sess. 
P.L. 78-534. 
Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers 
July 13, 1994. 
H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. 
P.L. 75-761 
S. Committee Print, Puyallup 
River, WA. 
74th Cong., 2d Sess. 
P.L. 78-534. 
S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 
P.L. 78-534. 
H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 
P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. 
P.L. 469, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 
P.L. 78-534. 
P.L. 94-587 
P.L. 95-26 
-38-24- 
TABLE 38-B 
(Continued) 
21. 
23. 
June 30, 1948 
as amended 
May 17, 1950 
Aug. 6, 1958 
Nov. 17, 1986 
25. 
26. 
July 24, 1946 
as amended 
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA 
June 22, 1936 Flood control dam on White River. 
27. 
28. 
30. 
31. 
Dec. 22, 1944 
as amended 
Nov. 17, 1986 
June 22, 1936 
June 28, 1938 
June 22, 1936 
Dec. 22, 1944 
as amended 
May 17, 1950 
Dec 22, 1944 
as amended 
July 24, 1946 
June 30, 1948 
July 9, 1952 
Dec. 22, 1944 
as amended 
Oct. 22, 1976 
as amended 
May 4, 1977 
32. 
33.

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
(Continued) 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
34. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT 
May 17, 1950 Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 
facilities. 
Nov. 7, 1966 School facilities for education of dependents of construction P.L. 89-789 
personnel, Libby project. 
Jan. 2, 1968 Airport facility at Kelley Flats, MT. P.L. 90-2395 
Aug. 13, 1968 Design standards for relocation of Montana State P.L. 90-483 6 
Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana 
pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. 
June 19, 1970 Participation with State of Montana in construction, P.L. 91-2827 
operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. 
Dec. 31, 1970 Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded P.L. 91-625 
by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. 
Dec. 31, 1970 Design and construction of sewage collection and sewage P.L. 91-611 
treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal 
facilities of Rexford, MT; and compensation for railroad 
employees suffering long-term economic injury through 
reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail 
transportation facilities due to the construction of 
Libby Dam. 
Mar. 7, 1974 Phase I design memorandum stage for installation of S.Doc. 29, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., 
power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. P.L. 93-251 
Mar. 7, 1974 Construction of fish production measures to compensate P.L. 93-251 
for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition 
of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and 
utilities (amends P.L. 91-282 by increasing limitation from 
$750,000 to $4,000,000). 
Mar. 7, 1974 Acquisition of land (not to exceed $2,000,000) for prevention P.L. 93-251 
of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. 
Mar. 7, 1974 Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary P.L. 93-251 
County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge 
made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown 
operations at Libby Dam. 
Mar. 7, 1974 Compensation (not to exceed $1,500,000) to Drainage P.L. 93-251 
Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands.in 
Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, ID, for damages caused 
by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations 
at Libby Dam. 
Oct. 22, 1976 Amends P.L. 93-251 by increasing limitation from $350,000 P.L. 94-587 
to $380,000 for reimbursement to Boundary County, ID, 
for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge. 
Nov. 17, 1988 Alleviate low water impact on existing facilities and protect H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. 
Indian archeological sites exposed during course of P.L. 100-676 
operations, at an estimated cost of $750,000. 
1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 
2. Included in Public Works Administration program. 
3. Maintenance of these items, as well as sandspit north 
of James Island, is included in this modification. 
4. Included in Emergency Relief program, May 28, 1935. 
5. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, 
Section 502. 
6. Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. 
7. River Basin Monetary Authorization and Miscellaneous 
Civil Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. 
-38-25-

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 38-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Cost To Sep. 30, 1995 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual And 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Anacortes Navigation Channel, WAI 
Bellingham Harbor, WA (I&J Street Waterway) l 
Blaine Harbor, WA 
Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA 
East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, W AI 
Edmonds Harbor, WA2 
Flathead River, MT 
Hammersley Inlet, WA 
Hoquiam River, WA 
Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA1I 
Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA I 
Kingston Harbor, WA 
Kootenai River, ID and MT 
Mats Mats Bay, W AI 
Neah Bay, WA 
Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA 
Poison Bay, Flathead Lake, MT 
Port Angeles Harbor, WA3 
Port Gamble Harbor, WA 
Port Orchard Bay, WA4 
Port Townsend, WA 
Prototype Breakwater Test Program, WAI 
Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA 
Skagit River, WA 
Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Bellingham, WAl 
Tacoma Harbor, WA 
Waterway Connecting Port Townsend 
and Oak Bay, WA 
Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA 1 
1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 
107, Public Law 86-645. 
2. Constructed by local interests at a cost of $415,000. Excludes 
$1,000 Coast Guard funds expended for new work. Corps of Enineers 
is responsible for maintenance. 
3. Maintenance by Port of Port Angeles. 
4. No maintenance required. 
5. Excludes $457,200 contributed funds expended. 
6. Excludes $2,500 Coast Guard funds expended. 
7. Includes S8,005 appropriated and expended for previous project. 
8. Excludes $2,184,766 contributed funds expended. 
9. Excludes $32,373 Emergency Relief funds expended. 
10. Excludes $114,272 contributed funds expended. 
I 1. Excludes $390,753 contributed funds and $3,000 Coast Guard 
funds expended. 
TABLE 38-D OTHER AUTHORIZED B 
12. Mitigation of shore damages study. 
13. Excludes $28,288 contributed funds and $9,000 Coast Guard 
funds expended. 
14. Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. 
15. Excludes $92,423 contributed funds expended. 
16. Excludes $15,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 
17. Includes $2,500 appropriated and expended for previous 
project. 
18. Excludes $1,570,886 contributed funds expended. 
19. Includes $159,585 appropriated and expended for previous 
project. Excludes $51,609 Public Works Administration funds 
expended and $1,147,208 contributed funds expended. 
20. Includes $5,347 appropriated and expended for previous 
projects. Excludes $222,500 contributed funds expended. 
21. Excludes $1,230,035 contributed funds expended. 
EACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost To Sep. 30, 1995 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual And 
Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 
Ediz Hook, WA Completed 1994 $5,878,740 1 1,501,430 2 
I. Excludes $385.850() contributed funds expended. 2. Excludes $159,388 contributed funds expended. 
-38-26- 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Abandoned 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
1977 
1966 
1958 
1923 
1985 
1987 
1901 
1950 
1950 
1993 
1993 
1967 
1933 
1970 
1982 
1913 
1918 
1960 
1953 
1928 
1987 
1985 
1962 
1950 
1981 
1992 
1987 
1981 
825,263 5 
125,634 6 
346,650 
274,391 7 
1,619,956 8 
9,811 
9,000 
18,921 9 
946,000 
264,000 10 
262,570 11 
9,255 
137,679 13 
2,057,266 
63,879 
4,491 
470,873 
11,911 14 
42,804 
480,899 15 
1,461,590 
2,575,091 16 
102,330 17 
1,744,025 18 
2,383,891 19 
73,322 
2,000,000 21 
-- 
7,693
-- 
224,756
-- 
10,683 
5,316 
444,329 
5,000 12 
5,643 
1,854,058 
7,634 
259 
13,337 
78,787 
36,258 
1,537,150 20 
378,753 
--

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Contributed 
Project Status Report for Construction Funds 
American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WAI Completed 1957 59,582 10,000 
Bear Creek, Flathead CountyBridge, near Essex, MT2 Completed 1971 1,424 -- 
Bitterroot River, Florence, MT2 Completed 1990 180,950 49,759 
Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT2 Completed 1964 17,836 -- 
Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1981 156,000 -- 
Bogachiel River, Undie Road, Forks, WA2 Completed 1981 57,000 -- 
Cedar River, King County, WA3 Completed 1953 3,229 -- 
Cedar River, Renton, WA2 Completed 1949 32,264 -- 
Chehalis River, City of ChehalisRaw Water 
Pumphouse, WA2 Completed 1966 35,454 -- 
Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston 
County, WA2 Completed 1965 47,916 -- 
Chehalis River, Montesano, WA2 Completed 1977 140,080 -- 
Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 48,698 -- 
Clallam Bay at Sekiu, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1994 178,800 39,818 
Clallam River, Highway 112, WA2 Completed 1981 43,500 -- 
Clark Fork River, near Garrison, MT2 Completed 1993 80,611 16,973 
Clark Fork River, Drummond, MT2 Completed 1978 18,660 -- 
Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT2 Completed 1978 31,548 -- 
Clark Fork River, Superior, MT2 Completed 1971 28,357 -- 
Clark Fork River, Vicinity of Plains, MT2 Completed 1950 27,947 -- 
Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA2 Completed 1968 50,000 24,728 
Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA2 Completed 1950 49,165 -- 
Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID Completed 1941 152,872 -- 
Coeur d'Alene River, Springston, ID2 Completed 1950 25,452 -- 
Coffee Creek, WA3 Completed 1966 15,000 -- 
Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, 
ID, MT, and WA: 
Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT Completed 1983 384,862 5 13,500 
Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, ID Completed 1959 42,726 -- 
Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge near 
Tumwater, WA2 Completed 1965 26,292 -- 
Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East 
Olympia, WA2 Completed 1967 22,956 -- 
Dungeness River, Area 5, WA2 Completed 1950 2,155 2,155 
Dungeness River, Area 8, WA2 Completed 1950 2,895 2,895 
Dungeness River, Clallam County, WAl Completed 1964 52,040 6 -- 
Dungeness River, Sequim, WA2 Completed 1981 99,000 -- 
Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1986 47,500 -- 
Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA2 Completed 1961 14,093 3,314 
Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WAl Completed 1991 1,455,023 119,449 
Elwha River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1951 17,303 -- 
Entiat River, WA3 Completed 1971 49,300 -- 
Entiat River, Chelan County, WA2 Completed 1978 38,000 -- 
Flathead River, MT2 Completed 1972 20,940 -- 
Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT2 Completed 1955 26,265 -- 
Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT2 Completed 1948 33,347 -- 
Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT2 Completed 1964 13,438 -- 
Flower and Parmenter Creeks, MT 3 Completed 1950 2,320 -- 
Foster Creek, West Fork, WA 2 Completed 1958 19,513 -- 
Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA2 Completed 1962 50,000 -- 
Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and 
Allentown, WA2 Completed 1972 24,605 -- 
Green River, State Highway 181, WA2 Completed 1976 27,001 -- 
-38-27-

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
(Continued) 
For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Contributed 
Project Status Report for Construction Funds 
Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA2 Completed 1977 37,359 -- 
Hoh River, County Road 216, WA2 Completed 1980 143,000 -- 
Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA2 Completed 1980 194,000 -- 
Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1360)2 Completed 1956 22,082 21,807 
Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1361)2 Completed 1961 11,916 -- 
Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1362)2 Completed 1964 41,622 -- 
Hoh River, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1983 173,000 7 -- 
Hoko River, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 21,083 -- 
Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA2 Completed 1977 59,812 -- 
Hoquiam River, WA2 Completed 1977 52,600 -- 
Jackman Creek, Skagit River, WA 3 Completed 1962 24,000 -- 
Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID2 Completed 1950 42,325 -- 
Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID2 Completed 1965 14,885 -- 
La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA2 Completed 1979 40,525 -- 
Lower Green River, King County, WAl1 Completed 1993 912,000 120,518 
Methow Methow River, WA (MET 1-74)2 Completed 1974 15,700 -- 
River, WA (MET 2-74)2 Completed 1974 11,200 -- 
Methow River, WA (MET 3-74)2 Completed 1974 13,450 -- 
Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA2 Completed 1976 19,810 -- 
Methow River, State Highway No. 16 Bridge, 
Twisp, WA2 Completed 1949 31,783 -- 
Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of 
Twisp, WA2 Completed 1951 33,300 6,786 
Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA2 Completed 1951 11,726 11,726 
Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA2 Completed 1972 11,836 -- 
Missoula, MT (Sewage Treatment Plant)2 Completed 1965 50,000 -- 
Moclips River, Moclips, WA2 Completed 1977 17,608 -- 
Naches River, Naches, WA2 Completed 1982 59,000 -- 
Neah Bay, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1991 253,995 78,433 
Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA2 Completed 1972 24,792 -- 
Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA2 Completed 1948 37,636 -- 
Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA2 Completed 1960 26,790 -- 
Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA2 Completed 1952 19,345 -- 
Nooksack River, WA3 Completed 1948 24,006 -- 
Nooksack River, Acme, WA2 Completed 1985 77,300 -- 
Nooksack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA2 Completed 1950 6,075 6,075 
Nooksack River, Middle Fork, Deming, WA2 Completed 1986 79,000 -- 
Nooksack River, above Highway 12 Bridge, WA2 Completed 1960 10,807 -- 
Okanogan River, WA2 Completed 1974 10,100 -- 
Okanogan River at Outlet of Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Completed 1949 52,100 -- 
Okanogan River, Tonasket Creek and Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Completed 1953 7,987 -- 
Okanogan River, Omak, WA I Completed 1981 2,231,030 -- 
Okanogan River, Oroville, WA I Completed 1982 1,787,630 -- 
Pilchuck River, WA3 Completed 1948 25,401 -- 
Pilchuck River, WA2 Completed 1985 81,000 -- 
Pilchuck River, WA2 Completed 1971 10,713 -- 
Pilchuck River, Everett, WA2 Completed 1980 54,000 -- 
Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA2 Completed 1971 30,973 -- 
Placer Creek, ID Completed 1986 5,865,000 -- 
Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT2 Completed 1964 11,291 -- 
Puyallup River, WA Completed 1937 50,000 8 -- 
Pysht River, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 86,160 -- 
Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA2 Completed 1981 125,000 -- 
Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA2 Completed 1972 39,300 -- 
-38-28-

TABLE 38-E 
(Continued) 
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1995 
Full Report 
See Annual Contributed 
Project Status Report for Construction Funds 
Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA2 
Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA2 
Rock Creek, Granite County, MT2 
Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT2 
Rock Creek Road, MT2 
Rye Creek, MT2 
St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID 
St. Regis River, MT3 
St. Regis River at St. Regis, MT3 
Sammamish River, WA 
Sauk River, WA2 
Sauk River, Skagit County, WA2 
Shelton Creek, WAI 
Skagit River at Burlington Bend, WA2 
Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA2 
Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA2 
Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA2 
Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA2 
Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 66-1)2 
Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 67-1)2 
Skykomish River, North Fork, Index, WA2 
Snohomish River, Lowell-Snohomish River Road, WA2 
Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA2 
Snoqualmie River, West Snoqualmie, WA2 
Soleduck River Bridge, WA2 
Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA2 
Spokane River, Spokane, WA 2 
Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WAI 
Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop 
Highway, near Robe, WA2 
Stillwater River, MT2 
Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT2 
Strong Creek, Hope, ID2 
Tahola, WA2 
Upper Puyallup River, WA4 
Wynoochee Lake, WA 
Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA2 
Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA2 
Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (WR-1-72)2 
Yakima, Yakima River, WA 
Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA2 
Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River, 
near Cle Elum, WA2 
Yakima River, West Richland, WA2 
Yakima River, Yakima WA2 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
1981 
1961 
1974 
1973 
1980 
1973 
1942 
1942 
1951 
1967 
1974 
1989 
1979 
1949 
1966 
1980 
1980 
1963 
1966 
1967 
1981 
1969 
1970 
1977 
1961 
1963 
1989 
1970 
1964 
1973 
1977 
1970 
1979 
1938 
1994 
1976 
1969 
1972 
1948 
1949 
1947 
1977 
1983 
208,000 
15,928 
49,657 
31,565 
50,000 
22,819 
357,698 
7,234 9 
2,983 
2,582,536 10 
20,860 
119,600 
872,021 
50,000 
46,489 
93,000 
137,000 
40,753 
17,719 
50,000 
222,500 
44,227 
60,900 
15,565 
16,437 
11,433 
122,138 
271,713 
50,000 
17,457 
34,513 
8,442 
223,893 
71,495 11 
23,494,445 12 
111,072 
50,000 
50,000 13 
381,961 
8,047 
48,272 
36,768 
125,500 14 
1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 
205, Public Law 858, 8('h Congress, as amended. 
2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 14, 
Public Law 526, 79'h Congress, as amended. 
3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 2, 
Public Law 406, 75 
'h Congress, as amended 
4. Authorized by Works Progress Administration Project No. OP 
65-93-917. 
5. Includes $7,850 appropriated and expended for recreation 
facilities at completed project (Code 710). 
6. Excludes $340,066 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 
7. Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98- 
8). Excludes $189,000 Federal Highway Administration funds xpended. 
8. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 
-38-29- 
4.943 
696,923
-- 
32,778
-- 
-- 
24,488
-- 
14,307 
1,960 
79,311 
46,182
-- 
13,704 
21,311
--

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
9. Excludes amount expended by Works Progress Administration 
which is not available. 
10. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 
S1i. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 
12. Includes $102,200 appropriated and expended for recreation 
facilities at completed project (Code 710). 
Excludes $17,070,670 for project maintenance and $66,678 for 
TABLE 38-F 
Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of 
Navigable Waters, appropriated and expended. 
13. Excludes $17,988 Office of Emergency Planning funds 
expended. 
14. Includes $118,000 expended under Productive Employment 
Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98-8). 
For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1995 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual and 
Project Report for Construction Maintenance 
Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA 1954 350,000 1 
1. For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended for acquis- Wanapum Dams, in accordance with Public Law 544, 83d Contion 
of lands under partnership arrangement for Priest Rapids and gress. Project constructed by Grant County Public Utility District. 
TABLE 38-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Date Funds Funds 
Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Calispell Creek, WA I 1968 1968 $25,000 14 
Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, 
ID, MT, and WA: 
Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA2 
Entiat River, WA3 
Methow River, WA3 
Okanogan River, WA3 
St. Regis River, MT4 
Wenatchee River, WA4 
Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA3 
Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (RH 68) 6 
Flathead River at Kalispell, MT7 
Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 48) 
(Unconstructed Portion) 6,8 
Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 30) 6,9 
Hammersley Inlet, WA (RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion)4,10 
Hoquiam,Aberdeen, and Cosmopolis, Chehalis River, WAS5 
Olympia Harbor, WA (RH 45) 6 
Port Angeles Harbor, WA (RH 45)4 
Port Gamble Harbor, WA) (RH 35)4 
Quillayute River, WA(RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion)3,1 1 
Seattle Harbor, WA (RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion) 3,12 
Skagit River, WA (RH 10) (Unconstructed Portion) 4,13 
Skagit River, WA (RH 19) 4 
Skagit River, WA (Avon Pass) 6 
Skagit River, WA (Levee and Channel Improvements)7 
Spokane River, Spokane, WA3 
Stillaguamish River, WA (RH 45)3 
Wenatchee, Canyons I and 2, WA 6 
Willapa River at Raymond, WA7 
1958 
1958 
1958 
1958 
1958 
1958 
1980 
1973 
1981 
1962 
1933 
1950 
1948 
1973 
1960 
1953 
1986 
1986 
1950 
1950 
1968 
1982 
1939 
1946 
1978 
1982 
1964 
1986 
1986 
1986 
1978 
1978 
1986 
1990 
1995 
1990 
1990 
1978 
1952 
1990 
1977 
1977 
1986 
1986 
1978 
1978 
1990 
1995 
1986 
1986 
1990 
1995 
9,000 14 
1,100 14 
1,400 14 
44,300 14,15 
52,000 14 
300,000 14 
35,834 
83,631 14 
21,606 14,16 
54,468 14 
1,934,792 
2,944 14 
4,234 17 
544,331 14 
508,130 14,18 
-38-30- 
OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, 
INCLUDING POWER 
$35,834

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 
1. Authority for project expired October 27, 1968. 
2. Authority for project expired July 1964. 
3. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 dated 
November 17, 1986. 
4. Deauthorized under authority of Section 12, P.L. 93-251 dated 
March 7, 1974. 
5. Authority for project expired in October 1952. 
6. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1001(b) (1), P.L. 99- 
662 dated November 17, 1986. 
7. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1001(b) (2), P.L. 99- 
662 dated November 17, 1986. 
8. 2200 linear feet of revetment at Point Chehalis. 
TABLE 38-H LAKE WASHINGTON 
9. 16 foot channel from Cosmopolis to Montesano. 
10. Deepening shoal area near Cannery Point from 10 to 13 feet. 
11 Groin feature of the project. 
12. Settling basin at upper end of existing Duwamish Waterway, 
about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge. 
13. 5500-foot extension of training dike. 
14. Preconstruction planning only. 
15. Includes $14,300 expended for restudy, FY 1970. 
16. Includes $18,700 expended for restudy, FY 1968-1973. 
17. Economic restudy only. 
18. Includes $8,888 expended for restudy, 
FY 1967-1972. 
FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM 
(SEE SECTION 8) 
Section Large Lock Small Lock 
Miles above mouth 11/4 11/4 
Clear width of chamber Feet 80 28 
Maximum available length Feet 760 123 
Lift Feet 26 26 
Depth on upper miter sill l Feet 331/2 16 
Depth on intermediate miter sill2 Feet 29 -- 
Depth on lower miter sill2 Feet 29 16 
Character of foundation Clay Clay 
Kind of dam Fixed dam with Fixed dam with 
gated spillway. gated spillway. 
Type of construction Concrete Concrete 
Year completed 1916 1916 
Cost 3 3 
1. Low water in upper pool. 
2. Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. 
3. 'Cost of double lock and dam was $2,382,200 and the emergency 
gates, completed in 1923, $262,300. 
-38-31- 
SHIP CANAL. WA PRINCIPAL

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 38-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS 
(SEE SECTION 12) 
Name of Project Date Survey Conducted 
Washington: 
Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA August 1995 
Kingston Harbor, WA March 1995 
Olympia Harbor, WA August 1995 
Tacoma, WA August, September 1995 
Waterway connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA September 1995 
TABLE 38-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, 
PUBLIC LAW 858, 80TH CONGRESS, AS AMENDED 
(PREAUTHORIZATION) 
Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1995) 
Cedar River, Renton, WA $179,844 1 
Horseshoe Bend, WA 24,236 
Lake Cavanaugh, WA 02 
Long Road, F.C. District, Chehalis River, WA 46,977 3 
Milo Creek, Kellogg, ID 42,149 
Skagit and Samish Rivers, WA 368 4 
Skagit River, West Mt. Vernon, WA 4,167 4 
Snoqualmie River, WA 9,557 
Upper Cedar River, WA 90,316 
TOTAL $397,614 
I. Excludes $79,179 contributed funds expended. 3. Excludes $20,435 contributed funds expended. 
2. Terminated FY 1994. 4. Terminated. 
TABLE 38-K EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES 
REPAIR, FLOOD FIGHTING, AND RESCUE WORK 
(PUBLIC LAW 99, 84TH CONG., AND ANTECEDENT LEGISLATION) 
Project And Location Fiscal Year Costs (1995) 
Disaster Preparedness 
Emergency Operations 
Rehabilitation 
$461,773 
23,516 
52,355 
TOTAL $537,644 
-38-32-

WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT *
This District consists of all Columbia River drainage 
and tributaries thereto between the head of the McNary 
pool (river mile 345.4) and Umatilla Bridge (river mile 
290.5) below McNary Dam, except the Yakima River 
Basin above the Van Giesen Street Bridge 
(river mile 8.4) near Richland, Washington. The primary 
tributary drainage area is the Snake River which includes 
more than 107,000 square miles in six states: Washington, 
Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming, and small portions of Nevada 
and Utah. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation 
1. Navigation Work Under Special 
Authorization.......................................... 39-2 
Flood Control 
2. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood 
Protection Projects .......................................... 39-2 
3. Flood Control Work Under 
Special Authorization ..................................... 39-2 
4. Inspection of Completed 
Flood Control Projects..................................... 39-3 
5. Jackson Hole, W Y.............................................. 39-3 
6. Lucky Peak Lake, ID.......................................... 39-3 
7. Mill Creek, Bennington Lake, 
W A ........................................................ .......... 39-4 
8. Scheduling Flood Control 
Reservoir Operations......................................... 39-4 
Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 
9. Zintel Canyon Dam, WA .................................. 39-4 
10. Columbia River Juvenile Fish 
Mitigation Program, OR, 
W A , & ID ....................................................... 39-5 
11. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID...................... 39-6 
12. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, 
Lake Sacajawea, WA ... ........................ 39-7 
13. Little Goose Lock and Dam, 
Lake Bryan, W A .................................... .......... 39-7 
14. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, 
Lower Granite Lake, WA................................... 39-8 
15. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, 
Lake Herbert G. West, WA ............................... 39-9 
16. Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife 
Compensation Plan, WA, 
OR, and ID ......................................... 39-9 
17. McNary Lock and Dam, Lake 
Wallula, OR and WA....................................... 39-10 
18. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, 
ID and W A ..................... ..................... 39-10 
19. Snake River Downstream from 
Johnson Bar Landing, OR, 
W A , and ID .................................................. 39-10 
General Investigations 
20. Surveys.................... . ..... ............. 39-11 
21. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............ 39-12 
22. Preconstruction, Engineering 
and D esign.................................................... 39-12 
Tables 
Table 39-A Cost and Financial Statement............... 39-13 
Table 39-B Authorizing Legislation ....................... 39-16 
Table 39-C Other Authorized Navigation 
Projects......... ............................... 39-20 
Table 39-D Not Applicable 
Table 39-E Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects ................................... 39-21 
Table 39-F Other Authorized Multiple- 
Purpose Projects, Including 
Pow er.............................. .................. 39-22 
Table 39-G Deauthorized Projects .......................... 39-22 
Table 39-H Columbia River Basin, Local 
Flood Control Projects.......................... 39-23 
Table 39-I Inspection of Completed 
Flood Control Projects.......................... 39-23 
Table 39-J Principal Data Concerning 
Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, 
Powerplant and Impoundment.............. 39-24 
Table 39-K Snake River Downstream from 
Johnson Bar Landing, OR, 
W A, and ID ...................................... 39-28 
39-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
Navigation 
1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public 
Law (PL) 86-645. A reconnaissance study for adding a 
new barge slip at the Port of Walla Walla, Snake River, 
near Burbank, WA, was terminated due to loss of local 
sponsorship. Fiscal year costs were $8. 
Flood Control 
2. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL 
FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS 
Location. Improvements included in this project are 
along the Columbia River and its tributaries. 
Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1950 
approved a general comprehensive plan for the Columbia 
River Basin for flood control and other purposes based on 
plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Congress, 2nd Session, and 
authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial 
accomplishment of certain projects. From that 
authorization, an amount (not to exceed $15 million) was 
allotted for construction of local flood protection works 
throughout Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions 
that all work undertaken pursuant to authorization would 
be economically justified prior to construction, and local 
cooperation specified in the Flood Control Act of 1936, as 
amended, should be required (see Tables 39-B and -H, for 
projects in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla 
District). 
Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 
June 22, 1936, applies. 
Operations during the fiscal year. No projects were 
deauthorized. 
3. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 
PL 858, 80th Congress, as amended: 
No Section 205 work was performed in fiscal year 
1995. 
Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood 
fighting, and rescue work (PL 99, 84th Congress, and 
antecedent legislation): 
Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14, Flood 
Control Act of 1946, PL 526, 79th Congress): 
Construction commitments and Congressional adds 
in fiscal year 1995, under Section 14, Continuing 
Authorities Program exceeded the statutory limit of $12.5 
million. These national program over-commitments 
prompted drastic actions. 
District Commanders were directed (November 15, 
1995) to delay any study or project not meeting the 
essential imminent threat criterion until funds were 
available to complete the study or award a construction 
contract. Essential facilities are defined as those facilities 
whose failure would cause loss of life, pose a significant 
health threat, or severely threaten public safety. Imminent 
threat means that failure of the facility will likely occur 
this fiscal year (before September 30, 1995). Any project 
must first meet the essential criterion and also the 
imminent criterion. 
The future of the Continuing Authorities Program, 
under which the Section 14 projects are funded, is 
uncertain. The Administration proposed a phase-out of 
this program. However, both the House and Senate 
Reports accompanying the fiscal year 1996 Energy and 
Water Development Appropriation bills took exception to 
that proposal, yet reduced the budget request for the 
program. At this point, there is no resolution to the 
differences concerning the overall program direction nor is 
there a determination on how we will proceed, due to the 
constrained funding. Once these decisions are made, 
requests for Continuing Authorities Program work will be 
further considered. At this time, we can not forecast when 
funding will be available to continue work. 
Fiscal year costs were $20,297 for continuation of 
three feasibility studies: 1) The Snake River upstream of 
Blackfoot, ID ($3,770); 2) Fort Hall Landmark, ID ($51); 
and 3) Willow Creek downstream of LaCrosse, WA 
($10,388); and an initiation of two feasibility studies: 
1) Grand Ronde River, OR ($3,042); and 2) Little Weiser 
River, near Gladhart Lane ($3,046). 
Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and 
tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 
Flood Control Act of 1954, PL 780, 83rd Congress): 
Fiscal year costs of $34 for completing two feasibility 
studies, including Big Lost River, upstream of Arco, ID 
($26) and Little Weiser River, upstream of Cambridge, ID 
($8). 
There were no Federal costs for this fiscal year. 
39-2

WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT 
Project modification for the Improvement of the 
Environment pursuant to Section 1135(b), PL 99-362, as 
amended: 
Fiscal year costs were $268,133, including 
continuation of feasibility studies on Jackson Hole Project, 
WY ($19,204); Potneuf River, Pocatello, ID, unit 
restoration ($127,370); Walla Walla River, OR ($76,220); 
Catherine Creek at Union, OR ($36,829); the initiation of a 
new feasibility study on the Little Weiser River, ID 
($6,786); and initial appraisals and coordination works 
($1,724). 
4. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Federal law requires local interests to maintain and 
operate completed local protection projects in accordance 
with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Army. 
Inspections were made to determine the extent of 
compliance and to advise local interests, as necessary, of 
measures required to correct deficiencies (see Table 39-I 
for inspections made during the fiscal year). 
Fiscal year costs were $35,754. Total costs to 
September 30, 1995 were $2,800,995. 
5. JACKSON HOLE, WY 
Location. On the banks of the Snake River, Teton 
County, west of Jackson, WY. 
Existing project. On the Snake River, 
approximately 23.5 miles of Federally constructed levees 
consisting of the following: 1) On the right bank -a series 
of levees, off-set levees, and bank protection structures, all 
with full riprap protection from 10 miles upstream of the 
Jackson-Wilson Bridge to 3.5 miles below the bridge for a 
total of 13.5 miles. 2) The left bank - a series of Federally 
constructed levees and bank protection structures, all with 
full riprap protection, extending from 10 miles upstream of 
the Jackson-Wilson Bridge to 5 miles upstream and 
extending 1.5 miles immediately upstream of the same 
bridge to 3.5 miles below the bridge for a total of 
10 miles. In addition, a series of Federal and non-Federal 
constructed levees, with a total length of approximately 5 
miles, most having some or full riprap protection, are 
interspersed along both banks of the Snake River from 
Highway 26 Bridge to 4 miles downstream of the Jackson- 
Wilson Bridge. 
On the Gros Ventre River, approximately 2 miles of 
riprap protected levees on the left bank from 1.5 miles west 
of Cattlemen's Bridge and extending to 0.5 miles east of 
the same bridge. On the right bank, a series of levees 
extending from 0.5 miles west of Cattlemen's Bridge to 
approximately 0.3 miles east of the same bridge. 
Project authorized by PL 516, Flood Control Act of 
1950, for flood control protection by channel 
improvements consisting of channel rectification, levees, 
and revetments along the Snake River in the vicinity of 
Wilson, WY. The PL 99-662 modified the original PL 516 
to ensure the operation, maintenance, modifications, and 
additions to the project become Federal responsibility. 
Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors shall pay 
the initial $35,000 in cash or materials of any such costs 
expended in any one year, plus inflation as of the date of 
enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986. 
Operations during fiscal year. No emergency 
maintenance was required this spring, although there was 
over 200 percent of normal snowpack and flows that 
reached 17 cubic feet per second (cfs). Routine levee 
maintenance was again performed by Teton County under 
the Local Cooperative Agreement. Project activities were 
scheduled around the critical Bald Eagle nesting period; 
thus, eliminating the need for monitoring. Work on the 
National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA) 
documentation for local levee access roads has continued 
smoothly. Due to input received from the initial public 
review; additions will be made to the document and it will 
be sent out for a second public review in January 1996. 
There was little normal levee maintenance performed by 
the Corps this summer because there were no responsive 
bidders to our contracts. The contracts were revised and 
re-advertised (maintenance will begin in October 1996). 
Fiscal year costs were $585,860. 
6. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID 
Location. On the Boise River in southwestern ID 
about 10 miles southeast of the city of Boise, ID. 
Existing project. The project includes a rolledearthfill 
dam about 250 feet above the streambed and 1,700 
feet long at the crest, with a lake providing a total storage 
at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acre-feet. Project 
provides for flood control, irrigation, and recreation (for 
details, see page 2,000 of the 1962 Annual Report). 
Construction of the existing project was initiated in 
November 1949 and completed in June 1961. Since 1961, 
$183,642,000 (adjusted to October 1995 price index) in 
potential flood damages have been prevented by the 
project. 
During a detailed study of outlet capacity and 
potential for adding hydropower to the existing project, a 
need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction 
of an auxiliary outlet was authorized in the Water Resource 
Development Act of 1976. In fiscal year 1978, an "Interim 
39-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and 
Lake" (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of 
Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, 
agencies, and the Chief of Engineers have commented on 
the report to the Secretary of the Army 
The report was forwarded to the Office of Management and 
Budget in February 1982. 
A license to construct and operate power facilities at 
the project was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Project #2832) to the Boise Project Board of 
Control on June 10, 1980. and modified on October 9, 
1980 and in 1982 Construction of the auxiliary outlet 
facility began in May 1984 and was completed in August 
1986. Construction of modifications to the existing outlet 
tunnel and powerhouse excavation began in August 1986 
and was completed January 1987. Powerhouse general 
contract construction began in April 1986. The project 
was completed and dedicated on October 7, 1988. Power 
on-line for all units was August 18, 1988. Federally 
authorized 2nd outlet was deauthorized in fiscal year 1990. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Operation and 
Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance, which 
included the dam structures and recreation areas 
continued. Fiscal year costs were $987,954. 
7. MILL CREEK-BENNINGTON LAKE, 
WA 
Location. In and upstream from Walla Walla, WA, 
on Mill Creek, a tributary of the Walla Walla River. 
Existing project. The project includes an off-stream 
earthfill storage dam, about 125 feet above the streambed 
and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concrete-lined outlet 
channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and diversion 
structures. Project provides for flood control and 
recreation. Authorizing legislation to provide a channel 
through the city of Walla Walla was added to the project in 
1941. Recreation was added to the project purposes 
through the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. 
Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was 
completed in 1942. Paving of the channel through the city 
of Walla Walla was completed in 1966 (for details, see 
page 2.005 of the 1962 Annual Report). Since 1942, 
$13.255.000 (adjusted to October 1995 price index) in 
potential flood damage has been prevented by the 
combined storage and channel operation. 
Rehabilitation of the existing project was initiated in 
fiscal year 1978 and completed in fiscal year 1979. The 
plan of rehabilitation included action to correct the seepage 
and internal crosion which has occurred during each 
subsequent filling of the reservoir. A cutoff wall was 
constructed, but did not alleviate the seepage problem, thus 
requiring limited flood control use of the project. The 
seepage and internal erosion create a high vulnerability for 
dam failure. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with (for details, 
see page 2,006 of the 1962 Annual Report). 
Operations during fiscal year. Operation and 
Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance 
continued, which included regulation of water control 
structures and care of recreation areas. Fiscal year costs 
were $611,523. 
8. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL 
RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 
Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was 
accomplished under several authorities. Regulation of 
Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoirs in 
ID, and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and 
Mason Reservoirs in OR, was accomplished as authorized 
under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and 
coordinated with the Bureau of Reclamation. 
Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, Arrowrock 
Reservoir, and Lake Lowell were in accordance with 
formal agreements with the Bureau of Reclamation. 
Regulation of American Falls, Owyhee, Magic, Mackay, 
Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, ID, for flood control 
were accomplished under informal agreements. Brownlee, 
Oxbow, and Hells Canyon Reservoirs provided flood 
control regulation in accordance with provisions of the 
Federal Power Commission license to ID Power Company. 
Fiscal year costs were $291,184. 
Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 
9. ZINTEL CANYON DAM, WA 
Location. Located near Kennewick, WA, at the 
mouth of Zintel Canyon in Benton County. 
Existing project. The project consists of a 90-foot 
high, roller-compacted concrete detention dam with an 
uncontrolled spillway and a fixed release outlet works at 
the mouth of Zintel Canyon, a 78-inch buried conduit 
(400-cfs capacity), 4,165 feet in length through town, 
channel improvements, and a culvert under the Burlington 
Northern Railroad. A flood dike plug across the Union 
Pacific Railroad protects downtown Kennewick when 
major flood flows occur. The dam and associated works 
will provide 100-year protection at the dam site and 
approximately 50-year protection through the city. 
The average annual flood damage reduction benefits are 
$1,040.100. 
39-4

WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT 
The project was authorized by PL 298, 89th 
Congress, Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. 
The Project Cooperation Agreement was approved by the 
Assistant Secretary of the Army and signed by the city of 
Kennewick in July 1991. Funds were appropriated for 
construction in fiscal year 1991. The project consisted of 
two parts: 1) A channel, which was awarded in January 
1992, and 2) A dam, which was awarded in March 1992. 
Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors and the 
city of Kennewick, WA, cost-shared 25 percent of the total 
project cost. Current estimated Federal and non-Federal 
project cost is $9,700,000. The estimated Federal cost is 
$7,275,000. 
Operations during fiscal year. Both channel and 
dam contracts were completed. Fiscal year costs were 
$17,604. Total costs to September 1995 were $6,264,612. 
10. COLUMBIA RIVER FISH 
MITIGATION PROGRAM (WALLA 
WALLA PROJECTS) OR, WA, & ID 
Location. At Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little 
Goose, and Lower Granite Dams on the Snake River in the 
State of WA and McNary Dam on the Columbia River in 
the States of OR and WA. 
Existing project. The eight Corps hydroelectric 
projects on the Columbia and Snake Rivers have been 
identified as a major contributing factor in causing 
mortality to downstream migrating juvenile salmon and 
steelhead. Without adequate bypass facilities to guide 
these juvenile fish away from the power turbines at the 
dams, mortalities incurred through project passage severely 
impact the commercial, recreational, and Indian fisheries. 
The Corps has recognized the need to reduce juvenile 
mortality and has undertaken bypass measures that include 
mechanized fish bypass systems with barge and truck 
transportation. Spill as an additional bypass route over the 
spillways has been used to divert fish from entering turbine 
units, but it is a significant adverse economic factor due to 
lost power revenues. Congress passed and the President 
signed the fiscal year 1989 Energy and Water Development 
Appropriation Act (PL 100-371), which mandated the 
expenditure of funds for the design, testing, and 
construction of new or improved fish bypass facilities for 
the Columbia River Fish Mitigation projects. Completion 
of bypass and transportation facilities will significantly 
increase the survival of migrating downstream juvenile 
fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope 
of the fish mitigation facilities for these Columbia and 
Snake River dams. 
The plan of improvement includes the following 
facilities: 1) Ice Harbor, submerged standard traveling 
fish screens, intake gate raise, new gantry crane, collection 
bypass facility: 2) Lower Monumental, submerged 
standard traveling fish screens, gate raise modification, 
gantry crane, collection bypass facility, and 
holding/loading facilities; 3) Little Goose, gantry crane 
modification, gate raise modification, submerged extended 
fish screens, and holding/loading facilities Phase I and II; 
4) Lower Granite, submerged extended fish screens, two 
fish transport barges, gate raise modification, fish support 
facility, wet separator, barge moorage facility expansion, 
and gantry crane modification; 5) McNary, submerged 
extended fish screens, gantry crane modification, collection 
and bypass facilities, transport holding/loading facilities, 
gate raise modification, and extended screen rehabilitation 
facility; 6) A mitigation study that analyzes long-term 
alternatives to mitigation for fish losses at Corps dams on 
the Columbia and Snake Rivers. 
The fully-funded Federal project cost is estimated at 
$418,626,000 for Walla Walla projects. 
Ice Harbor bypass facilities were not initially 
authorized for construction under the Columbia River Fish 
Mitigation Program. However, in fiscal year 1989, 
Congress authorized expenditures to proceed with design 
of a bypass system. The mitigation study project was 
added to the President's fiscal year 1991 budget. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. At Little Goose 
Dam contracts were completed on the Gantry Crane Mod II 
and the Prototype Vertical Barrier Screens. At Lower 
Granite Dam contracts for the Fish Bypass Outfall Pipe, 
the Prototype Vertical Barrier Screens, and the Spare Fish 
Slot were completed. At Lower Monumental Dam 
contracts for the Pit Tag System and Fish Holding/Loading 
Facilities were completed. A mitigation analysis evaluated 
alternatives that would result in adult and/or juvenile 
bypass improvements at Corps dams on the Columbia and 
Snake Rivers. The Phase I report was completed and in 
December 1994, the Northwest Power Planning Council 
issued new amendments to their fish and wildlife program. 
Those amendments ignored the results of the Corps' Phase 
I report and adopted a more aggressive adaptive 
management strategy that called for implementation of 
some measures including the Snake River drawdown. In 
March 1995, National Marine Fisheries Service issued 
their biological opinion for the operation of the Federal 
Columbia River Power System and Juvenile Transportation 
Program in 1995 and future years. The Reasonable and 
Prudent Alternatives, Incidental Take Statements, and 
Conversation Measures included in that opinion now 
provide the framework for Phase II of the Corps Mitigation 
Analysis. 
Fiscal year costs were $43,396,226. Total project 
costs are $174,366,639. 
39-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
11. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, 
ID 
Location. The dam is on North Fork Clearwater 
River. 1.9 miles above its junction with Clearwater River, 
near Orofino, ID, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, ID. 
Existing project. The project includes a dam, 
powerplant. and appurtenant facilities Project provides for 
flood control. navigation, hydroelectric power generation, 
recreation. and area redevelopment. The reservoir has a 
normal operating range between the elevations of 1,600 
and 1.445 Mean Sea Level (msl). The reservoir has a 
gross storage capacity of 3,453,000 acre-feet (2 million 
acre-feet of which are effective for both local and regional 
flood control and for at-site and downstream power 
generation). In addition, the reservoir, extending 53 miles 
into rugged and relatively inaccessible timberland, 
provides important transportation savings in connection 
with movements of marketable logs. The reservoir is 
habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife. The dam structure 
is about 3.300 feet long and about 717 feet above the 
streambed. The Fish passage is not feasible due to the 
height of the dam. A hatchery has been built below the 
dam to assure continuance of anadromous fish runs. The 
Powerhouse has two 90,000 kilowatts (kw) and one 
220,000 kw generating units in operation for a capacity of 
400,000 kw. Provisions had been made for three 
additional 220,000 kw generating units for an ultimate 
installed capacity of 1,060,000 kw and a reconnaissance 
report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the 
addition of a 200.000 kw fourth generating unit was 
completed in fiscal year 1978. However, environmental 
and economic studies on additional generating units have 
been curtailed due to public opposition. Unit 4 is 
undeveloped. Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized fiscal year 
1990. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. 
Construction of the project started in July 1966, was 
placed in operation in 1972, and was completed in 1986. 
Since the project became operational in June 1972. it has 
prevented about $737,000 (adjusted to October 1995 price 
index) in potential flood damages. Power generation 
through September 1995 was 36.53 billion kw hours. 
Eighty mini-recreation sites have been established 
along the reservoir shoreline. Each site includes at least a 
picnic table. U.S. Forest Service-type fireplace, and 
chemical toilet. Some of the sites have several picnic 
tables. Dent Acres and Freeman Creek recreation sites are 
open to the public. Facilities consist of a boat-launching 
ramp. boat docks. car-trailcr parking. comfort stations, and 
fill dcycloped overnight camping. 
Operations during fiscal year Operation and 
Maintenance Development of wildlife habitat browse 
continued on project lands to provide winter browse for elk 
and deer. Completed work on Big Eddy boat ramp and 
Dent Acres boat ramp extension. Initiated work on 
Freeman Creek ramp extension and water supply. During 
the fiscal year, 1.4 billion kw hours of electrical power 
were generated by the three generating units. 
Dworshak National Fish Hatchery (DNFH): Just 
under 2.9 million steelhead smolts were released in the 
Spring of 1995. This release was above the mitigation goal 
of 2.3 million. These smolts from brood year 1994 
averaged 187 mm in length, under the 200 mm target size 
due to cold water in the summer. The smolts were reared 
with a low number of losses to Infection Hemotopoietic 
Necrosis Virus (IHNV) or Ich. A total of 331,777 pounds 
of steelhead were produced this year compared to 280,377 
pounds produced and released in 1994. 
The steelhead production program (brood year 1995) 
at DNFH completed another early rearing phase in the 
hatchery's nursery without any problems with the IHNV. 
This is the fourth nursery rearing program that relied 
entirely on the water supply from Dworshak Reservoir. 
The 6,400 gallons per minute (gpm) received is sufficient 
to allow eggs and fry to be raised in reservoir water. The 
steelhead in this brood year also made the transition to 
outside rearing ponds from water of the North Fork of the 
Clearwater River. The IHNV disease was a problem in 
recent years, but rearing the fish to a larger size and taking 
them to outside ponds later have reduced losses. A total of 
6.76 million green eggs were produced from the 1,811 
adult steelhead that returned to Dworshak and Kooskia 
National Fish Hatchery. Despite the low number of 
returning adults, the complex was able to ship 2,454,200 
eyed eggs to the Clearwater and Magic Valley fish 
hatcheries. 
The DNFH also released 1,311,445 spring chinook 
salmon weighing 93,422 pounds in the Spring of 1995. 
This is above the 75,386 pounds of spring chinook released 
in 1994; although fish numbers were quite close. The 
smolts released this year averaged 14.0 fish per pound, 
somewhat larger than the average smolt of earlier years. 
This was due to a decision to feed these fish close to 
manufacturer's recommended feeding rates rather than 
reduced feeding rates and compromise fish quality. Spring 
chinook adult returns to DNFH in 1995 produced only 124 
fish, most of which were one-salt males. Only 51,250 eyed 
eggs resulted from these returning adults, or less than 
4 percent of program goals. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
39-6

WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT 
12. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM-LAKE 
SACAJAWEA, WA 
Location. On the Snake River, 9.7 miles above river 
mouth at head of Lake Wallula (McNary Reservoir) and 12 
miles east of Pasco, WA. 
Existing project. The project includes a dam, 
powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and 
appurtenant facilities. The project provides navigation, 
hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental 
irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range 
between elevations 440 and 435 msl. Lake Sacajawea 
extends upstream about 31.9 miles and provides slack 
water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. The dam 
structure is about 2,790 feet long and about 130 feet above 
the streambed. The fish passage facilities include two fish 
ladders. Powerhouse has three 90,000 kw units and three 
111,000 kw generating units in operation for a capacity of 
603,000 kw. 
The spillway dam is 610 feet long and overflow crest 
at elevation 391 msl is surmounted by 10 radial gates, 50 
feet wide and 51 feet high, which provide the capacity to 
pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. The 
deck is at elevation 453 msl and provides a service road 
and track for a gantry crane. The navigation lock is a 
single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet 
and a 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation 
channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 41.6 miles long is 
provided from the mouth of the Snake River to the dam 
and from the dam to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. 
Principal data are set forth in Table 
39-J. 
Construction of the original project started in 
December 1955, was placed in operation in 1961, and 
completed in 1971. Construction of the additional 
generating units was started in 1971 and completed in 
1981. Power generation through September 1995 was 
71.01 billion kw hours. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Repair work was completed on the navigation hard-rock 
dolphin, powerhouse roof, and visitor center's roof. 
Initiated repair contracts for navigation lock gate and Unit 
5. Operation and Maintenance: During the fiscal year 2.1 
billion kw hours of electrical power were generated by the 
six generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, 
consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood 
products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 
4,279,837 tons during calendar year 1994. 
13. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAMLAKE 
BRYAN, WA 
Location. The dam is 70.3 miles above the mouth of 
the Snake River and at head of Lake Herbert G. West 
(Lower Monumental Reservoir), about 40 miles northerly 
of Walla Walla, WA, and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, 
ID. 
Existing project. The project includes a dam, 
powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant 
facilities. The project provides for navigation, 
hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental 
irrigation..The reservoir has a normal operating range 
between elevations 638 and 633 msl. Lake Bryan extends 
upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to 
Lower Granite Lock and Dam. The dam structure is 2,655 
feet long and about 165 feet above the streambed. Fish 
passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both 
shores with a fish channel through the spillway, which 
connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and 
south shore ladder. The powerhouse has six 135,000 kw 
generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kw. 
Spillway dam is 498 feet long and the overflow crest at 
elevation 581 msl is surmounted by eight radial gates, 50 
feet wide and 60 feet high, which provide the capacity to 
pass a design flood of 850,000 cfs. Navigation lock is 
single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 
feet, and a 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. 
A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 37.2 
miles long is provided from the dam to Lower Granite 
Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included 32 
miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 6.8 miles of county roads, 
2.2 miles of state highways, and Central Ferry Bridge. 
Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. 
Construction of the original project started in 1963, 
was placed in operation in 1970 and completed in 1976. 
Construction of additional generating units started in 1974 
and was completed in 1984. Power generation through 
September 1995 was 59.88 billion kw hours. 
Location cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Contract completed for Units 2 and 3 turbine and fish 
pump turbine repairs. Initiated and completed dredging of 
navigation channel at Schultz Bar. Operation and 
Maintenance: During the fiscal year, 2.7 billion kw hours 
of electrical power were generated by the six generating 
units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of 
grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and 
miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 3,542,685 tons 
during calendar year 1994. 
39-7

R URF OF I fib SECRETAKY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIViTIES FOR 1995 
14. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, 
WA 
Location. At river mile 107.5 on the Snake River at 
the head of Lake Bryan (Little Goose Reservoir) and about 
33 miles downstream from Lewiston, ID. 
Existing project. The project includes a dam, 
powerplant. navigation lock. fish ladder, appurtenant 
facilities, and required about 8 miles of slackwater levees 
along the Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, ID. 
The project provides for slackwater navigation, 
hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental 
irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range 
between elevations 738 and 733 msl in Lewiston, ID, and 
Clarkston, WA. Lower Granite pool extends upstream 
about 38 miles and provides slackwater to the confluence 
of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. The dam structure is 
about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet above the 
streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with 
entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the 
spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection 
system and south shore ladder. The powerhouse has six 
135,000 kw generating units in operation for a capacity of 
810,000 kw. Spillway dam is 512 feet long and the 
overflow crest at elevation 581 msl is surmounted by eight 
radial gates, 60 feet wide and 60.5 feet high, which provide 
the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cfs. 
Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan 
dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth 
over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 
14 feet deep, and 38 miles long is provided from the dam 
to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. 
Principal data are set forth in Table 
39-J. 
Construction of the original project started in July 
1965. was placed in operation in 1975, and completed in 
1984. Construction of additional generating units was 
started in 1974 and completed in 1979. Power generation 
through September 1995 was 51.39 billion kw hours. 
Approximately $4.622.000 (adjusted to October 1995 price 
index) in potential flood damage has been prevented since 
the levees became functional. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Contract initiated for fish-trap repair. Contract completed 
for powerhouse roof repair. Contract awarded for repair of 
Lewiston Water Intake. Operation and Maintenance: 
During the fiscal year. 2.9 billion kw hours of electrical 
power were generated by the six generating units. Traffic 
through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum 
products. fertilizer. wood products, and miscellaneous 
cargo and amounted to 2.313.586 tons during calendar 
year 1994. 
As the first collection point on the Snake River, 
Lower Granite is a primary component of the District's 
Juvenile Fish Transportation Program. Transport began in 
the late 1960's as a study of methods of bypassing juvenile 
salmon and steelhead around the turbines of the Corps' 
Snake and Columbia River dams. Transport became a 
routine operation in 1980 while other structural 
modifications such as, installing screens and development 
of bypass systems continue 
The 1995 Transport Season was marked by improved 
river flows compared to drought conditions that have 
prevailed in the Columbia and Snake Rivers for most years 
since 1987. River flows in 1995 were equivalent to the 30- 
year average. Collection totaled 9,733,497 fish at Lower 
Granite compared to 6,911,174 fish in 1994 and 8,025,621 
fish in 1993. Daily collection peaked at a new record level 
of 910,051 fish on May 3 compared to a peak of 507,700 
fish in 1994 and the previous project daily collection 
record of 893,100 fish in 1993. High fish numbers several 
days in a row resulted in over 518,000 fish being released 
back to the river due to exceeding barge and raceway 
carrying capacity. A yearly total of 668,602 fish were 
bypassed for this reason and various research projects. At 
Little Goose Dam 3,070,040 juvenile salmon and steelhead 
were collected, a new seasonal record, up from the 
1,513,538 fish collected in 1993. Approximately 660,000 
fish were bypassed at Little Goose in 1995 as a result of 
lack of barge space and for various research projects. 
Lower Monumental Dam collected 2,734,298 juvenile 
salmon and steelhead, an increase from the 1,634,864 fish 
collected in 1994 and 1,337,339 fish collected 1993. A 
total of 1,073,869 fish were bypassed due to lack of barging 
space and for various research projects. At McNary Dam, 
9,018,555 juvenile fish were collected, a slight increase 
from the 8,750,448 fish collected in 1994. Peak collection 
was 147,800 on May 18 when yearling fish dominated 
collection, and 617,100 on July 4 when subyearling fish 
comprised 99.9 percent of the collection. Juvenile fish 
collected during the spring were bypassed in compliance 
with National Marine Fisheries Service's biological 
opinion for endangered species act consultation. 
Transportation began in late June when subyearling 
chinook salmon predominated the collection. 
A total of 3,517,529 juvenile fish were bypassed for this 
reason and for various research projects. A grand total of 
24,556,390 fish were collected in 1995, a new 
transportation program collection record, exceeding the 
previous record total of 22,261,661 collected in 1990. A 
total of 18,579,398 juvenile fish were transported, 75.6 
percent of those collected. Of those transported 700,470 
(3.7 percent) were by truck and 17,878,928 (96.3 percent) 
were by barge. 
39-8 

WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT 
15. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND 
DAM-LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA 
Location. On the Snake River at the head of Lake 
Sacajawea (Ice Harbor Reservoir), about 45 miles northeast 
of Pasco, WA, and 41.6 miles above river mouth. 
Existing project. The project includes a dam, 
powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and 
appurtenant facilities. The project provides for navigation, 
hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental 
irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range 
between elevations 540 and 537 msl. Lake Herbert G. 
West extends upstream about 28.7 miles and provides slack 
water to Little Goose Lock and Dam. The dam structure is 
about 3,800 feet long and about 135 feet above the 
streambed. The fish passage facilities include two fish 
ladders, one at each end of the dam. The powerhouse has 
six 135,000 kw generating units in operation for a capacity 
of 810,000 kw. The spillway dam is 508 feet long and the 
overflow crest at elevation 483 msl is surmounted by eight 
radial gates, 50 feet wide and 61 feet high, which provide 
capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cfs. Deck is at 
elevation 553 msl and provides a service road and track for 
a gantry crane. The navigation lock is a single-lift type 
with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet 
and a 15-foot minimum depth of the sills. A navigation 
channel (250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 28.1 miles long) 
is provided from the dam to Little Goose Lock and Dam. 
Relocations along the lake included railroads and 
highways. Principal data are set forth in Table 
39-J. 
Construction of the original project started in June 
1961, placed in operation in 1969 and completed in 1976. 
Construction of the additional generating units started in 
1975 and was completed in 1981. Power generation 
through September 1995 was 73.3 billion kw hours. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 
Contracts completed for unit 3 and fish pump turbine 
repairs. Contracts continuing for cavatation and 
powerhouse roof repairs. Operation and Maintenance: 
During the fiscal year 2.9 billion kw hours of electrical 
power were generated by the six generating units. Traffic 
through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum 
products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous 
cargo and amounted to 3,678,206 tons during calendar 
year 1994. 
16. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND 
WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, 
OR, AND ID 
Location. At various locations within the Columbia 
and Snake River drainages in the States of ID, OR, and 
WA. 
Existing project. The project consists of a series of 
fish hatcheries, wildlife development areas, and purchase 
of off-site project lands for fishing and hunting access. 
The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and 
anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of 
construction of four multiple purposes dams and reservoirs 
on the Lower Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower 
Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite). 
The real estate design memorandum, and feature 
design memorandums on all hatcheries and satellites, the 
off-project wildlife lands, and the site selection report have 
all been approved. A final Environmental Impact 
Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental 
Quality on November 2, 1977. The DNFH Expansion; 
Irrigon, Hagerman, Lyons Ferry, Lookingglass, McCall, 
Sawtooth, Magic Valley, and Clearwater Hatcheries; and 
water supply are in operation. Transfer actions, whereby 
the Corps turns real property over to the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, have been completed for Eagle Lab, 
Magic Valley, and Red River. Fencing is nearly complete 
at all wildlife development areas. The compensation plan 
is 91 percent complete. 
Estimated Federal cost for the project is 
$232,000,000. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. New work: Offproject 
land acquisition is 100 percent complete. Letter 
supplements will be completed for development actions at 
Myrtle Beach and Magill Public Fishing areas. Hunting 
access development continues at Windmill, Revere, 
Shumaker, Pintler Creek, Harstock, Fisher Gulch, and 
Campbell. Expect to begin development this fiscal year for 
hunting access at Wallula, John Henley, and Central Ferry 
and fishing access at Couse Creek, Swank, Asotin Creek, 
Yakima River, Walla Walla River, and Clearwater River 
sites. Transfer actions are in process for Lyons Ferry 
facilities. A design supplement is in place for correcting 
water supply deficiencies at Irrigon Hatchery. Senate 
Conference Report (103-672, page 7) directs the Corps to 
work with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine 
Fisheries Service, affected states, and tribal hatchery 
managers in developing adult trapping and juvenile 
acclimation facilities for the Upper Grande Ronde River 
39-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
and Catherine Creek, a water treatment facility at 
Lookingglass Hatchery, and final rearing and/or 
acclimation facilities for the Clearwater. Snake, and lower 
Grande Ronde Rivers. These initiatives are required to 
attain the levels of adult salmon and steelhead runs under 
the authorized project. 
17. McNARY LOCK AND DAM, LAKE 
WALLULA, OR, AND WA 
Location. On the Columbia River. 292 miles above 
mouth, near Umatilla, OR, and 3 miles above the mouth of 
the Umatilla River. 
Existing project. The project includes a dam, 
powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, appurtenant 
facilities, and a system of levees and pumping plants. The 
project provides for slackwater navigation, hydroelectric 
power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. 
The reservoir has a normal operating range between 
elevations 340 and 335 msl. Lake Wallula extends 
upstream about 64 miles and provides slack water to Ice 
Harbor Lock and Dam. The dam structure is 7,365 feet 
long and about 183 feet above the streambed. Fish passage 
facilities include two fish ladders. The powerhouse has 14 
70.000 kw generating units in operation for a capacity of 
980.000 kw. The spillway dam is 1,310 feet long and the 
overflow crest is at elevation 291 msl and is surmounted by 
22 vertical lift gates. 50 feet wide and 51 feet high, which 
provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 2.2 million 
cfs. The navigation lock is a single-lift type with clear 
plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a 15-foot minimum 
depth over the sills. A navigation channel (250 feet wide, 
14 feet deep. and 32 miles long) is provided from the dam 
to the mouth of the Snake River. Relocations along the 
lake included railroad bridges over the Columbia and 
Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. 
Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. 
Construction started May 1947. was placed in 
operation in 1954. and was completed in 1982. Power 
generation through September 1995 was 246.69 billion kw 
hours.
Local cooperation. None required. 
Operations during fiscal year. Contracts initiated 
for fish pump repair, and Port of Pasco environmental 
cleanup. Environmental land testing of dump site 
complete. 
Operation and maintenance: During the fiscal year 6 
billion kw hours of electrical power were generated by the 
14 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock 
consisted of grains, petroleum projects. fertilizer, wood 
products. and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 
7.976.125 tons during calendar year 1994. 
18. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID 
AND WA 
Location. On the Snake River at river mile 141.3, 
1.7 miles upstream of the existing interstate bridge 
connecting the towns of Lewiston, ID and Clarkston, WA. 
Existing project. The project consists of a new fixed 
high-level four- lane highway bridge and approaches on 
U.S. Highway 12, across the Snake River constructed a 
cost "not to exceed $21 million." In December 1981, 
Congress authorized an additional expenditure of $2.2 
million for construction of Lewiston's North Ramp, which 
had been an unfunded additive item. An approach 
roadway from the bridge to 16th Avenue in Clarkston, 
WA, was authorized in July 1983 at an additional 
expenditure of $800,000. 
A final Environmental Impact Statement Supplement 
was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 
July 16, 1979. 
Local cooperation. Non-Federal interests have been 
provided, without cost to the United States, all lands, 
easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the 
construction of the bridge and its approaches, and after 
construction have agreed to own, operate toll free, and 
maintain the bridge and approach facilities. The non- 
Federal costs for land and relocation were $755,193. 
Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The 
Lewiston and Clarkston Bridge, WA, was completed in 
1982 at full Federal expense and turned over to non- 
Federal interests for ownership. Operation, and 
maintenance: Soon thereafter, a defect in the expansion 
joints became apparent. A Corrective Action Report was 
approved by North Pacific Division on September 1, 1993, 
that documented the problem and approved the 
replacement of the problem and approved the replacement 
of the expansion joints at full Federal expense. The 
current cost estimate is $250,000. Ordinarily, a small postconstruction 
problem like this would be funded with the 
project's operation and maintenance. However, in this 
case, there is no authority for Federal maintenance. 
Therefore, Construction, General funds will be used. 
Completion of the repair is scheduled for Spring of 1996. 
Fiscal year costs were $69,692. Total costs to 
September 30, 1995, were $23,155,524. 
19. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM 
JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA, AND 
ID 
Location. On the Snake River downstream from 
Johnson Bar Landing, river mile 230. The Snake River, 
which is the largest tributary of the Columbia River, rises 
in Yellowstone National Park in western WY, flows 
39-10

WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT 
generally westerly for about 1,000 miles, and empties into 
the Columbia River, near Pasco, WA, 324 miles from the 
Pacific Ocean. 
Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1945 
authorized construction of dams, as necessary, for power, 
incidental irrigation, and open channel improvements for 
purposes of providing slack-water navigation and irrigation 
between the mouth of the Snake River and Lewiston, ID. 
That authorization modified previous authorizations only 
for the portion of improvement below Lewiston, ID. Acts 
of June 13, 1902, and August 30, 1935, as they pertain to 
open river improvement from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar 
Landing, remain part of the existing project. 
Improvements included in existing project are Ice 
Harbor Lock and Dam, Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose Lock 
and Dam, Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and Dam; 
Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Lake Herbert G. West; 
and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar 
Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in 
an individual report, and cost and financial data for the 
entire project are shown on Table 39-A and 39-K. 
Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and 
Lower Granite are in full operation (see individual reports 
for details). For further details, see the following Annual 
Reports: page 2,246 for 1903; page 1,986 for 1906; page 
1,991 for 1915; and page 1,981 for 1962. 
Local cooperation. None required. 
Terminal Facilities. On Snake River from the 
mouth to Johnson Bar Landing there are 18 privatelyowned 
barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum 
products, fertilizers, wood products, cement, and other 
general cargo. There are also 5 marinas and 28 smallboat 
launching ramps, all open to the public. The facilities 
serve slack-water navigation to river mile 140, the site of 
Lewiston, ID. That slack-water reaches the Lewiston, ID 
and Clarkston, WA area since the lake behind Lower 
Granite Dam was filled in February 1975. 
Operations during fiscal year. See individual 
report for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, 
and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. On Snake River 
from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, 
reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted and 
survey markers were maintained. No costs were incurred 
this fiscal year. 
General Investigations 
20. SURVEYS 
The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
authorized the Corps to operate and maintain a system of 
non-Federal levees along the Snake River in the vicinity of 
Jackson Hole, WY. A draft reconnaissance study of the 
39-11 
potential for improving the system with levee raises, 
extensions, or relocations was completed in fiscal year 
1990. The final reconnaissance study was combined with 
the Jackson Hole Restoration Study. Jackson Hole River 
and Wetland Restoration and Flood Control 
Reconnaissance Study was initiated to restore fish and 
wildlife habitat in the 500-year flood plain of the leveed 
reach of the Snake and Gros Ventre Rivers at Jackson 
Hole, WY. The study has evaluated losses resulting from 
levee construction over the past 30 years and determined 
restoration measures to compensate for these losses. The 
report was approved in fiscal year 1994. A restoration 
feasibility study is expected to start in fiscal year 1996. 
The sponsor's concerns about their financial 
capability resulted in reducing the scope of the feasibility 
study.
A reconnaissance study was initiated for the Lower 
Boise River and Tributaries, ID on June 1, 1994. An 
interim reconnaissance report was completed in May 1995. 
Although the report included economically feasible 
alternatives for flood control, and environmental 
restoration, the local sponsor withdrew. Until a more 
appropriate sponsor is identified, the study was reclassified 
to "inactive" status by CECW-PW on September 6, 1995. 
The Energy and Water Development Act, PL 102- 
104, authorized a study in cooperation with the Port of 
Walla Walla, WA, for disposition of the current Walla 
Walla District Headquarters. The disposition study was 
continued and coordinated with General Services 
Administration (GSA) during fiscal year 1995. The Walla 
Walla District personnel met with the WA Department of 
Ecology (WDOE) during June 1995, to discuss the Corps' 
proposed plan to install additional test wells to determine 
vertical extent of petroleum contamination, impact on 
groundwater, and collect data requested by WDOE. The 
Walla Walla District agreed to drill four additional test 
wells and to continue monitoring and sampling of water 
from the five existing wells installed during initial site 
investigation. The Walla Walla District will prepare a 
drilling contract for the installation of four new wells and 
will continue to coordinate with WDOE and GSA. The 
installation of wells is anticipated second quarter fiscal 
year 1996, January timeframe. Data collected from new 
wells will be used to prepare Independent Remedial Action 
Report, for review by WDOE. 
Total cost of surveys was $539,129 for fiscal year 
1995, including: Flood Damage Prevention Studies 
($285,149); Coordination with other Federal agencies and 
non-Federal interests including Cooperation Water 
Resource Agencies, Planning Assistance to States, and 
Lewiston, ID, Regional Plan PHI ($81,696); Special 
Investigations, Interagency Water Resource Development 
FERC licensing activities, North American Waterfowl 
Management Plan, and National Marine Fisheries Service 
($127,911); and District Disposition Study ($44,373).

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC 
DATA
During the fiscal year, flood hazard data for a 
number of locations in the District were collected and 
analyzed. Flood information was provided to several 
Federal agencies; to the States of ID, OR and WA; to 
various cities and counties in those states, and to some 
private organizations. 
Total cost of collection and study of basic data during 
fiscal year was $177,590, which included: Flood plain 
management services ($14,440), technical services 
($20,270), quick responses ($5,580), and special studies 
($77,300). 
22. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING, 
AND DESIGN 
No Preconstruction, Engineering, and Design studies 
were conducted during the fiscal year. 
39-12

WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT 
TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total to 
Section In Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep 30, 1995 
Text 
6. Jackson Hole, WY 
(Contributed funds) 
7. Lucky Peak Lake, ID 
8. Mill Creek Lake, WA 
10. Zintel Canyon Dam, WA 
(Contributed funds) 
11. Columbia River Fish 
Mitigation Program, OR, 
WA, and ID 
12. Dworshak Dam and 
Reservoir, ID 
13. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, 
WA 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
$50,000 
34,120 
493,000 
713,204 
42,661 
42,660 
17,431 
947,000 
719,884 
42,681 
34,139 
$21,000 
23,349 
439,000 
666,406 
45,365 
53,902 
1,221,500 1,258,000 1,121,000 
1,128,878 1,347,974 1,081,880 
531,000 
538,305 
813,000 
797,853 
632,000 
659,917 
$26,600 
19,204 
462,000 
585,860 
44,598 
44,168 
969,000 
987,954 
634,000 
611,523 
8,500 
8,500 
1,050,000 
1,027,263 
396,820 268,117 
- 506,746 
55,748 
30,000 
30,430 
6,000 
17,605 
40,000 
28,152,000 28,869,000 35,294,000 35,289,000 
27,723,497 28,092,559 27,347,817 43,396,226 
5,000 
5,000 
$2,530,870 
2,523,449 
3,235,500 
3,926,1851 
252,5101 
252,074 
19,652,0812 
19,652,0812 
19,684,8653 
19,655,6533 
2,258,4954 
2,258,4954 
12,612,940 
12,580,302 
17,714,107 
17,714,107 
6,265,000 
6,264,613 
734,937 
537,176 
148,740,000 
147,186,465 
329,528,2965 
329,528,2965 
7,802,200 7,399,000 7,588,500 8,309,000 111,435,4576 
7,748,991 7,674,875 7,287,364 8,509,425 119,488,4876 
- - - - 168,029,7577 
- - - - 168,029,7577 
8,019,500 6,766,000 8,362,000 10,691,000 114,845,4048 
8,330,550 6,908,833 7,978,901 11,061,492 114,639,3178 
39-13

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 39-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See Total to 
Section In Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 Sep 30, 1995 
Text 
14. Little Goose Lock and 
Dam, WA 
15. Lower Granite Lock and 
Dam, WA 
16. Lower Monumental Lock 
and Dam, WA 
17. Lower Snake Fish and 
Wildlife Compensation, ID, 
OR, and WA 
(Contributed Funds) 
18. McNary Lock and Dam, 
Lake Wallula, OR and WA 
(Contributed Funds) 
19. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, 
ID and WA 
(Contributed funds) 
20. Snake River Downstream 
from Johnson Bar Landing, 
OR, WA, and ID 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Mamt 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
5,655,000 5,313,000 7,920,429 5,601,000 
5,191,554 5,571,138 6,991,605 7,188,670 
233,361,0229 
233,361,0229 
85,807,558 � 
85,702,58510 
- - - - 374,836,315"11 
- - - - 374,836,315" 
8,421,000 6,826,000 6,647,000 7,674,000 110,449,46812 
8,464,239 6,898,866 5,987,998 8,332,600 110,328,53212 
- - - - 20,000 
- - - - 20,000 
- - - - 238,612,73213 
- - - - 238,612,73213 
6,380,000 4,689,000 8,522,571 4,062,000 84,239,00814 
4,522,986 6,228,100 5,341,359 7,697,929 84,205,94914 
6,813,500 5,180,000 7,308,000 6,450,000 
7,094,430 4,984,930 4,994,517 8,565,913 
214,363,241 
213,375,011 
- - - - 223,965 
- - - - 223,965 
- - - - 326,293,10515 
- - - - 326,293,105's 
9,479,000 10,455,207 10,309,500 11,903,000 219,316,67016 
9,501,861 10,091,026 10,614,411 12,009,399 218,992,52816 
- - - - 43,707 
- - - - 43,707 
300,000 
69,692 
245,000 
119,536 
23,385,832 
23,155,524 
245,000 
119,536 
16,110,00020 10,268,781 9,912,219 19,676,000 1,084,574,58917 
15,893,07020 9,844,884 9,850,017 20,270,019 1,084,268,6741 
28,494,500 23,587,000 31,449,500 28,028,000 395,931,87718 
26,516,385 25,606,845 26,302,538 34,280,690 395,461,62018 
39-14

WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT 
1 Thirty-nine thousand dollars of the cost-sharing funds 
from county were received in FY 90, but were not 
expended until FY 91. 
2 Includes $570,831 appropriated and expended for 
Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 
3 Includes $66,700 allotted and expended under 
Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other 
Improvements of Navigable Waters. 
a Excludes $80,000 contributed funds, but includes 
$96,340 appropriated and expended for Code 710, 
Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 
5 Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds 
appropriated for and expended by Department of Interior 
in FYs 69 through 72 for hatchery operations. Includes 
$655,000 appropriated and expended for additional unit. 
6 Includes $20,137,847 regular project operation and 
maintenance funds expended by Department of Interior 
starting FY 72 for hatchery operations. FYs 72 through 
78, funds of $6,097,000 were charged to project as a cost, 
but not as an expenditure for accounting purposes. 
Includes $48,182 appropriated and expended under 
Special Recreation Use Fees. After FY 92, special 
recreation use fees included with O&M. Includes 
$1,310,750 appropriated and expended under Maintenance 
and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of 
Navigable Waters. 
SExcludes $82,500 contributed for artificial spawning 
channel. Includes $36,748,021 appropriated and expended 
for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $914,256 
appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation 
Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $789,000 
appropriated and $788,999 expended for Columbia River 
Fish Mitigation Program. 
8 Includes $48,919 appropriated and expended under 
Special Recreation Use Fees. After FY 92, special 
recreation fees included with O&M. Includes $641,063 
appropriated and expended under Maintenance and 
Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable 
Waters. 
9 Includes $60,941,807 appropriated and expended for 
additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $12,006,000 
appropriated and $12,006,000 expended for Columbia 
River Fish Mitigation Program. 
10 Includes $621,063 appropriated and expended under 
Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other 
Improvements of Navigable Waters. 
"i Includes $46,212,534 appropriated and expended for 
additional Units 4 through 6. Excludes $405,819 
contributed funds on lock and dam project. Includes 
$63,800 appropriated and expended for Code 710, 
Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes 
$10,645,966 appropriated and $7,056,001 expended for 
Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 
12 Includes $338,163 appropriated and expended under 
Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other 
Improvements of Navigable Waters. 
13 Includes $51,661,371 appropriated and expended for 
additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $2,239,000 
appropriated and $2,239,000 expended for Columbia 
River Fish Mitigation Program. 
14 Includes $372,376 appropriated and expended under 
Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other 
Improvements of Navigable Waters. 
15 Includes $1,976,586 appropriated and expended for 
Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 
Includes $3,778,000 appropriated and $3,778,000 
expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 
16 Includes $28,851 appropriated and expended under 
special recreation use fees and $1,035,860 appropriated 
and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams 
and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. After FY 
92, Special Recreation Use Fees included with O&M. 
17 Includes $400,150 for new work on previous projects 
(Pasco to Lewiston), and $34,613 for new work 
appropriation used for maintenance prior to 1953. 
Excludes $167,500 contributed funds for new work 
consisting of $85,000 for new work on existing projects 
(Pasco to Riparia), plus $82,500 for new work on existing 
artificial spawning channel. 
18 Includes $186,570 appropriated and expended for 
maintenance of previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and 
$401,019 appropriated and $390,527 expended open river 
Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. 
19 Adjusted to correct FY 89 appropriation from 
$2,140,000 to $2,120,000. 
20 This does not include the appropriations and cost from 
the mitigation analysis under the Columbia River Fish 
Program, which will be allocated at the conclusion of the 
analysis. 
39-15

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Date 
Authorizing 
Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
2. 
H. Doc 531, 81st Congress, 2nd 
Session 
39-16 
TABLE 39- 
See 
Section 
In Text 
May 17, 1950 
COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD 
PROTECTION PROJECTS 
Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Idaho. Levee left bank. 
Blackfoot River, Idaho. Levees, channel improvement, 
and rectification works. 
Boise Valley, Boise River, Idaho. Channel improvement 
and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada 
County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized 
April 18, 1967. Ada County Unit was deauthorized in 
1986. 
Camas Creek, Idaho. Channel deepening and 
rectification of a 20-mile reach of Camas Creek. 
Deauthorized in 1965. 
Gooding Area, Little Wood River, Idaho. Channel 
improvement. 
Grande Ronde Valley, Oregon. Levees and channel 
clearing, straightening and realignment; would 
complement stream regulation by upstream storage 
projects. Deauthorized in 1986. 
Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, Idaho. Channel 
clearing and rectification, levees, and bank protection. 
Henrys Fork Unit deauthorized in 1986. 
Jackson Hole, Snake River, Wyoming. Flood protection. 
Kendrick, Potlatch River, Idaho. Revetted levee. 
Little Wood River, Idaho. Flood protection in immediate 
area. Deauthorized in 1965. 
Malheur River, Oregon. Channel rectification, levees, and 
bank protection at Vale. Willow Creek unit was 
deauthorized on October 14, 1969. 
Mud Lake, Idaho, Idaho Falls Area. Flood protection. 
Deauthorized in 1990. 
Palouse River, Washington. Flood protection for urban and 
rural areas at Garfield and near Malden. Deauthorized in 
1986. 
Payette Valley, Idaho. Channel rectification, levees, and 
bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below 
Black Canyon Dam. Payette Valley was deauthorized on 
October 3, 1978. 
Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, Idaho. Concrete-lined 
channel through Pocatello. Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was 
deauthorized on October 14, 1969. 
Shelley Area, Snake River, Idaho. Bank protection. 
South Fork Clearwater River, Idaho. Emergency 
construction of levees and revetments. Deauthorized in 
1986. 
Teton River, Idaho. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. 
Tomanovich-Salmon City, Salmon, Idaho. Channel 
improvement. 
Weiser River, Weiser Area, Idaho. Intermittent channel 
realignment and improvement, levees, and bank 
protection, lower river area. Project deauthorized in 1990. 
Whitebird Creek, Idaho. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 
1986. 
J

WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT 
TABLE 39-B (Cont.) AUTI 
See Section Date 
In Text Authorizing 
Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Table 39-G 
Table 39-E 
Table 39-E 
Table 39-E 
7. 
8. 
Table 39-E 
10. 
11. 
IORIZING LEGISLATION 
CATHERINE CREEK LAKE, OREGON 
27 Oct 95 Flood control and multipurpose dam on Catherine Creek 
near Union, Oregon. Project deauthorized in 1990. 
CATHERINE CREEK, OREGON 
24 Sep 54 Organic debris removal along Catherine Creek. 
CLEAR AND BURNT RIVER, OREGON 
24 Jul46 Construction of riprap bank protection at city of Huntington 
Waste Water Lagoon. 
COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WASHINGTON 
22 Dec 44 Provides for flood control works in vicinity of and through 
Colfax, Washington, by channel enlargement and 
modification, levees, floodwalls, revetments, and 
modification of railroad bridges. 
LUCKY PEAK LAKE, IDAHO 
24 Jul46 Dam for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. 
22 Oct 76 
22 Dec 44 
as amended 
28 Jul 38 
as amended 
18 Aug 41 
Second outlet for streamflow maintenance. Deauthorized in 1990 
Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation 
facilities. 
MILL CREEK LAKE, WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON 
Off-stream storage project upstream from Walla Walla: 
Channel improvement through Walla Walla; concrete-lined 
channel. 
31 Oct 92 Redesignation of reservoir to the Virgil B. Bennington Lake 
OWYHEE RIVER, OREGON 
24 Sep 54 Gravel, brush and small tree removal from 12 miles of Owyhee 
as amended River. 
ZINTEL CANYON DAM, WASHINGTON 
27 Oct 65 Local protection reservoir to provide flood protection to 
portions of the City of Kennewick, Washington 
COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM 
19 Jul 88 Design, test and construction of fish bypass facilities at 
Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite and 
McNary Dams. 
H. Doc. 280, 89th Cong., 1st 
Session. 27 Oct 65 
Sec 208, PL 83-780, Authorized 
by Chief Engineers. 3 Sep 85 
Sec 14, PL 79-526, Authorized 
by Chief of Engineers. 10 Jul 
85 
Flood Control Act of 1944 
H. Doc. 888, 77th Cong., 2nd 
Session 
PL 79-526, Chief of Engineers 
Report, dated 13 May 46. 
PL 94-587 
Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 
1944 
H. Doc. 578, 75th 
Cong., 3rd Session 
H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong. 
Sec 377, PL 77-228, Cong. 3rd 
Session 
Sec. 118 PL 102-580 102nd 
Cong. 
Sec. 208, PL 83-780 Authorized 
by Chief of Engineers. 11 Feb 
85 
PL 89-298, Sec. 201 
PL 100-371 
39-17

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 39-B ( 
See Section 
In Text 
Cont.) 
Date 
Authorizing 
Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
12. 
13. 
14. 
15. 
16. 
17. 
18. 
v " r 
McNARY LOCK AND DAM, LAKE WALLULA, OREGON 
AND WASHINGTON 
2 Mar 45 Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and 
irrigation 
22 Dec 44 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation 
as amended facilities. 
17 Nov 86 Construction, operation, and maintenance of a second 
powerhouse. 
McNary Second Powerhouse automatically deauthorized on 
16 Nov 91 
(BRUCES EDDY) DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, 
IDAHO 
3 Jul 58 Preparation of detailed plans. 
23 Oct 62 Bruces Eddy Dam and reservoir for flood control, navigation, 
power, recreation, and area redevelopment. 
15 Aug 63 Redesignation of project as Dworshak Dam and Reservoir 
23 Oct 62 Dworshak Added Units 4, 5, and 6, Idaho. Units 5 and 6 
were deauthorized in Fiscal Year 1990. 
ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, LAKE SACAJAWEA, 
WASHINGTON 
2 Mar 45 Unit 1 of 4, Lower Snake River Project. Lock and dam for 
navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. 
22 Dec 44 Construction, Operation, and maintenance of recreation 
as amended facilities. 
LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, LAKE BRYAN, 
WASHINGTON 
2 Mar 45 Unit 3 of 4, Lower Snake River Project. Lock and dam for 
navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. 
31 Dec 70 Designation of reservoir as Lake Bryan. 
LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WASHINGTON 
2 Mar 45 Unit 4 of 4, Lower Snake River Project. Lock and dam for 
navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. 
LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, LAKE 
HERBERT G. WEST, WASHINGTON 
2 Mar 45 Unit 2 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for 
navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. 
25 May 78 Designation of reservoir as Lake Herbert G. West 
LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE 
COMPENSATION PLAN, WASHINGTON, OREGON, AND 
IDAHO 
22 Oct 76 Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. 
as amended 
17 Nov 86 Changes to land acquisition authority. 
39-18 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
S. Doc. 51, 84th Cong., 1st 
Session 
H. Doc. 403, 87th, PL 87-874 
Cong., 2nd Session 
PL 88-96 
PL 87-874 
H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd 
Session 
Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 
1944 
H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd 
Session 
PL 91-638 
H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd 
Session 
H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd 
Session 
PL 95-285 
PL 94-587 
H.R. 6 PL 99-662 
H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd 
Session 
Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 
1944 
H.R. 6, PL 99-662 
Sec. 1001, PL 99-362 
i

WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT 
TABLE 39-B (Cont.) Al 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
19. 
Table F 
20. 
Table E 
Table E 
Table E 
UTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, IDAHO AND 
WASHINGTON 
22 Oct 76 Four-lane highway bridge and approaches. 
29 Dec 81 Increase of authorized amount to $23,200,000. 
30 Jul 83 Approach roadway from bridge to Sixteenth Avenue in 
Clarkston, Washington. Increase of authorized amount to 
$24,000,000 
SNAKE RIVER MOUTH TO JOHNSON BAR, OREGON, 
WASHINGTON, AND IDAHO 
13 Jun 02 Open-river navigation Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. 
25 Jun 10 Mouth to Riparia. 
30 Aug 35 Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar 
2 Mar 45 Supersedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston, Idaho 
only. See Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, 
and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. 
OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
18 Aug 41 Dayton, Touchet River, Washington. Flood protection 
Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, Oregon flood 
protection. 
17 Nov 86 Malheur Lake, Oregon, Flood Damage 
22 Dec 44 Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, Idaho. Channel 
improvement. 
Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, Oregon. Flood 
protection 
11 Jul 56 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, Washington. Levees and 
protective work 
Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, Washington. Channel 
improvement. 
Mission and Lapwai Creeks, Idaho Construction of levee. 
Table E 23 Oct 62 Bear Creek, Kendrick, Idaho. Channel improvement. 
Lapwai Creek Culdesac, Idaho. Construct left bank levee 
Lyman Creek near Rexburg, Idaho. Channelization 
Tucannon River, Camp Wooten, Washington. Levee and 
channel work. 
23 Oct 62 Ririe Lake, Willow Creek, Idaho. Storage for flood control. 
6. and Table E 17 May 50 Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Flood control protection by 
channel improvement consisting of channel rectifiction, 
levees, and revetment along Snake River in vicinity of 
Wilson, 
17 Nov 86 Wyoming. Also operation, maintenance, modifications, and 
additions are Federal responsibility 
17 Nov 86 Little Wood River, Idaho. Flood protection 
PL 94-587 
PL 97-140 
PL 98-63 
H. Doc. 127, 56th Cong, 2nd 
Session 
H. Doc. 411, 55th Cong, 2nd 
Session 
Rivers and Harbors Committee, 
Doc. 25, 72nd Cong, 1st Session 
H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 2nd 
Session 
H. Doc. 662, 76th Cong., 3rd 
Session 
H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong., 3rd 
Session 
PL 99-662 
H. Doc. 452, 77th Cong., 1st 
Session 
PL 87-685 
PL 87-874 
PL 87-874 
PL 81-188 
PL 99-662 
PL 99-662 
39-19

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Date 
Authorizing 
Act Proiect and Work Authorized Documents 
Table G 23 Oct 62 Blackfoot Reservoir, Blackfoot River, Idaho. Modification to 
increase spillway capacity. Authorized in Oct 62 and 
27 Oct 65 Deauthorized in 1986. 
17 Nov 86 Grande Ronde Lake, Oregon. Flood control, irrigation, 
water 
23 Oct 62 supply, anadromous fish, downstream and resident trout 
fishery, recreation and downstream power. Deauthorized 
in 1986. 
Table G 17 Nov 86 Cottonwood Creek Dam, Idaho. Protection to highlydeveloped 
urban and suburban areas against flash 
floods. Authorized Oct 62, PL 89-298. Deauthorized in 
86. 
Table G 22 Dec 44 Pullman, Palouse River, Washington. Flood protection. 
Authorized Dec 44. Deauthorized in 86. 
Table G 7 Nov 66 Stuart Gulch Dam, Idaho. Protection to highly-developed 
urban and suburban areas against flash floods. 
Authorized 7 Nov 66. Deauthorized in 79. 
PL 87-874 
PL 89-298 
PL 99-662 
PL 89-298 
PL 99-662 
H.D. 452, 77th Cong., 1st 
Session 
PL 89-789, Section 201 
OTHER AUTHORIZED 
TABLE 39-C NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
For Last Full Cost to Sep 30, 1995 
Report See Annual Operation and 
Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance 
Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Completed 
Falls to Kennewick, Washington 
1. Obviated by The Dalles, John Day, and 
McNary Projects. 
TABLE 39-B ('Cont.) 
See Section 
In Text 
1968 $1,851,195 
39-20 
d . _. . . .. .

WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT 
OTHER AUTHORIZED 
TABLE 39-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
Cost to Sep 30, 1995 
For Last Full Report Operation and 
Project Status See Annual Report Construction Maintenance 
For: 
Asotmn Creek, Asotin, ID' Completed 1951 $12,019 - 
Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID' Completed 1970 133,518 - 
Big Wood River, IDS Completed 1985 784,930 - 
Boise River, ID5 Completed 1985 236,500 - 
Catherine Creek, OR Completed 1990 28,800 - 
Clear and Burnt River, OR Completed 1990 99,500 - 
Colfax, Palouse River, WA Completed 1990 5,810,240 - 
Connell, WA' Completed 1967 60,000 - 
Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Culdesak, Completed 1984 23,400 - 
ID2 
Dayton, Touchet River, WA Completed 1966 380,617 - 
Dry Creek, WAl Completed 1961 384,426 - 
Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA' Completed 1967 293,092 - 
Esquatzel Coulee, Mesa, WA' Completed 1969 38,631 - 
Gooding Area, ID' Completed 1954 86,126 - 
Graves Creek, ID' Completed 1953 75,469 - 
Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID Completed 1955 1,586,439 - 
Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY Completed 1978 2,504,245 - 
Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID' Completed 1972 176,833 - 
Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID' Completed 1973 113,296 - 
Little Wood River, ID6 Active 1993 353,534 - 
Lower Dry Creek Lowden, WAl Completed 1972 17,600 - 
Lyman Creek, ID' Completed 1971 230,315 - 
Malheur Lake Project, OR Completed 1990 4,729,348 - 
Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR Completed 1957 138,608 - 
Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR3 Completed 1968 2,327,578 - 
Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID' Completed 1965 54,538 - 
Orofmo Creek and Clearwater River, Orofmo, ID2 Inactive 1949 23,050 - 
Owyhee River, OR Completed 1990 69,316 - 
Rapid Creek, IDs Completed 1985 19,500 - 
Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA2 Completed 1977 110,815 - 
Pataba Creek at Pomeroy, WA2 Completed 1993 308,511 - 
Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID2 Completed 1967 39,172 - 
Riverside Area, Pasco, WA' Completed 1972 28,839 - 
Ririe Lake, ID Completed 1983 39,677,448 - 
Sewage Lagoon, Vale, OR2 Completed 1985 75,000 - 
Shobe Canyon, Heppner, OR' Completed 1970 5,000 - 
Snake River, Blackfoot, ID' Completed 1980 131,700 - 
Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID2 Completed 1952 8,501 - 
Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID' Completed 1968 32,425 - 
South Fork, Boise River, ID5 Completed 1985 44,400 - 
South Fork Clearwater River, Kooskia-Sites, ID Completed 1973 61,055 - 
Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID' Completed 1955 128,635 - 
Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA' Completed 1973 72,140 - 
Tucannon River, Wooten, WAl Completed 1971 74,305 - 
Umatilla River, OR' Completed 1961 161,540 - 
Wallowa River, Weaver Bridge, OR2 Completed 1960 16,118 - 
Weiser River, ID5 Completed 1985 293,739 - 
Willow Creek, ID' Completed 1963 976 - 
Willow Creek Lake, OR Completed 1985 37,231,332 - 
Yakima River, West Richland, WAl,4 Completed 1964 229,890 - 
Zintel Canyon Dam, Washington8 Active 6,801,788 - 
39-21

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
' Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205, PL 
80-858. 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 14, PL 
79-526. 
3 Exclusive of $6,300 contributed funds. 
4 Exclusive of $9,000 contributed funds. 
s Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 208, PL 
83-780. 
6 Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to PL 99-662. No 
funds authorized until Fiscal Year 1990. 
' Exclusive of $853,712 contributed funds. 
8 Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to PL 89-298. 
Construction began in 1992. 
OTHER AUTHORIZED 
TABLE 39-F MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER 
For Last Full 
Report See Annual Cost to Sep 30, 1995 
Project Report For: Operation and 
Construction Maintenance 
Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID 1990 23,155,524 
TABLE 39-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last Full 
Project Report See Annual Federal Contributed 
Report For: Date Funds Funds 
Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Asotin Dam, Snake River, ID and WA 1964 1975 - - 
Blackfoot Reservoir, ID 1980 1986 267,626 - 
Boise Valley, ID 
Ada County Unit 1963 1986 46,084 - 
Canyon County Unit 1963 1967 10,600 - 
Camas Creek, ID 1960 1965 9,080 - 
Catherine Creek Lake, OR 1978 1990 1,552,000 - 
Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, ID 1972 1986 195,686 - 
Dworshak Units 5 and 6, ID 1990 1990 655,000 - 
Grande Ronde Lake, OR 1966 1986 - - 
Grande Ronde Valley, OR 1958 1986 169,195 - 
Heise-Roberts Extension, ID 
Henrys Fork Unit 1968 1986 - - 
Little Wood River, ID 1960 1965 21,334 - 
Lower Walla Walla River, WA 1953 1986 4,000 - 
Lucky Peak 2nd Outlet, ID 1988 1990 - - 
Malheur River, OR 
Willow Creek Unit 1961 1969 13,000 - 
McNary Second Powerhouse, OR and WA 1991 1991 - - 
Mill Creek, WA 1958 1977 3,537 - 
Mud Lake Area, ID 1957 1990 5,994 - 
Palouse River, WA 1958 1986 2,000 - 
Payette Valley, ID 1960 1978 23,178 - 
Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek, ID 1969 1969 - - 
Pullman, Palouse River, WA 1964 1986 289,109 - 
S. Fork Clearwater River, ID 1973 1986 3,899 - 
Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID 1974 1979 234,100 - 
Teton River, ID 1955 1986 10,387 - 
Touchet River, WA 1957 1977 11,198 - 
Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID 1960 1990 112,757 - 
Whitebird Creek, ID 1957 1986 1,896 - 
39-22

WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT 
COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION 
TABLE 39-H PROJECTS (SEE SECTION 2 OF TEXT) 
Estimated 
Federal Cost to 
Project Status Cost Sep 30, 1995 
Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID Completed - $209,403 
Blackfoot River, ID Completed - 391,143 
Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Snake River Unit Completed - 3,402,958 
Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID Completed - 85,873 
Malheur River, OR Vale Unit Completed - 333,581 
Mud Lake, ID Inactive 1,187,000 5,996 
Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID Pocatello Unit Completed - 6,456,0321 
Shelley Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 32,348 
Weiser River, ID Deferred 1,565,000 37,757 
Weiser River, ID Cambridge-Midvale Deferred - 75,000 
TOTAL 11,030,091 
S Exclusive of $36,800 contributed funds. 
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL 
TABLE 39-I PROJECTS (SEE SECTION 4 OF TEXT) 
Inspection 
Project Complete 
Blackfoot River, ID August 1995 
Boise River, ID August 1995 
Burnt River, OR August 1995 
Clearwater River, ID August 1995 
Columbia River, WA August 1995 
Little Wood River, ID August 1995 
Malheur River, OR August 1995 
Palouse River, WA August 1995 
Payette River, WA September 1995 
Portneuf River, ID August 1995 
Snake River, ID August 1995 
Snake River, WY September 1995 
Touchet River, WA September 1995 
Walla Walla River, OR August 1995 
Walla Walla River, WA September 1995 
Yakima River, WA July 1995 
39-23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, 
TABLE 39-J SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT 
Project 
Dworshak Dam and 
Reservoir, Idaho 
(see Section 11 of text) 
Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, Washington 
(see Section 12 of Text) 
SPILLWAY DAM 
Type of Construction 
Completed 
Maximum Capacity 
Crest Elevation 
Control Gates: 
Type 
Size, Width by Height 
Number 
POWERPLANT 
Length 
Generating Units: 
Number Installed 
Rating, Each 
Total Capacity Installed 
Space for Additional 
Rating, Each 
Total Potential Capacity 
Maximum Structural Height 
First Power-On-Line 
IMPOUNDMENT 
Elevations: 
Normal Operating Range 
Maximum 
Flood Control Storage 
Lake Length 
Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1,600 
Length of Shoreline 
NAVIGATION LOCK 
Clear Width 
Clear Length 
Lift: 
Minimum 
Average 
Maximum 
Minimum Water Depth Over Sills 
Open to Navigation 
SPILLWAY DAM 
Type of Construction 
Completed 
Maximum Capacity 
Crest Elevation 
Control Gates: 
Type 
Size, Width by Height 
Number 
Concrete Gravity 
September 1974 
150,500 cfs 
1,613 feet 
Tainter 
50 ftby 55 ft 
2 
428 feet 
1 @ 90,000 kW 
2 @ 220,000 kW 
400,000 kW
3 
3 @ 220,000 kW 
1,060,000 kW 
150 feet 
March 1973 
1,600 - 1,445 feet 
1,605 feet 
2,000,000 ac-ft 
53 miles 
17,090 acres 
175 miles 
86 feet 
675 feet 
97 feet 
100 feet 
103 feet 
15 feet 
May 1962 
Concrete Gravity 
January 1962 
850,000 cfs 
391 feet 
Radial 
SOftby 51 ft 
10 
39-24

WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT 
TABLE 39-J (Cont.) 
Project 
PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, 
SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT 
POWERPLANT 
Length 
Generating Units: 
Number Installed 
Rating, Each 
Total Capacity Installed 
Maximum Structural Height 
First Power-On-Line 
Little Goose Lock and Dam, Washington 
(see Section 13 of text) 
IMPOUNDMENT 
Elevations: 
Normal Operating Range 
Maximum 
Lake Length 
Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 
Navigation Channel, Depth by Width 
Length of Shoreline 
NAVIGATION LOCK 
Clear Width 
Clear Length 
Lift: 
Minimum 
Average 
Maximum 
Minimum Water Depth Over Sills 
Opened to Navigation 
SPILLWAY DAM 
Type of Construction 
Completed 
Maximum Capacity 
Crest Elevation 
Control Gates: 
Type 
Size, Width by Height 
Number 
POWERPLANT 
Length 
Width 
Generating Units: 
Number Installed 
Rating, Each 
Total Capacity Installed 
Maximum Structural Height 
First Power-On-Line 
IMPOUNDMENT 
Elevations: 
Normal Operating Range 
Maximum 
Lake Length 
Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 
Navigation Channel, Depth by Width 
Length of Shoreline 
671 feet 
3 @ 90,000 kW 
3 @ 111,000 kW 
603,000 kW 
226 feet 
December 1961 
440-437 feet 
446 feet 
31.9 miles 
9,200 acres 
14 ft by 250 ft 
80 miles 
86 feet 
675 feet 
93 feet 
98 feet 
101 feet 
15 feet 
May 1970 
Concrete Gravity 
January 1970 
850,000 cfs 
581 feet 
Radial 
50 ft by 60 ft 
8 
656 feet 
243 feet
6 
135,000 kW 
810,000 kW 
244 feet 
March 1970 
638-633 feet 
646.5 feet 
37.2 miles 
10,025 acres 
14 ft by 250 ft 
92 miles 
39-25

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 39-J (Cont.) 
Project 
PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, 
SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT 
Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Washington 
(see Section 14 of text) 
Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, 
Washington (see Section 15 of text) 
NAVIGATION LOCK 
Clear Width 
Clear Length 
Lift: 
Minimum 
Average 
Maximum 
Minimum Water Depth Over Sills 
Opened to Navigation 
SPILLWAY DAM 
Type of Construction 
Completed 
Maximum Capacity 
Crest Elevation 
Control Gates: 
Type 
Size, Width by Height 
Number 
POWERPLANT 
Length 
Width 
Generating Units: 
Number Installed 
Rating, Each 
Total Capacity Installed 
Maximum Structural Height 
First Power-On-Line 
IMPOUNDMENT 
Elevations: 
Normal Operation Range 
Maximum 
Lake Length 
Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 
Navigation Channel, Depth by Width 
Length of Shoreline 
NAVIGATION LOCK 
Clear Width 
Clear Length 
Lift: 
Minimum 
Average 
Maximum 
Minimum Water Depth Over Sills 
Opened to Navigation 
SPILLWAY DAM 
Type of Construction 
Completed 
Maximum Capacity 
Crest Elevation 
Control Gates: 
Type 
Size, Width by Height 
Number 
86 feet 
675 feet 
95 feet 
100 feet 
105 feet 
15 feet 
May 1975 
Concrete Gravity 
February 1975 
850,000 cfs 
581 feet 
Radial 
50 ft by 60.5 ft 
8 
656 feet 
243 feet 
6 
135,000 kW 
810,000 kW 
246 feet 
April 1975 
738-733 feet 
746.5 feet 
38 miles 
8,900 acres 
14 ft by 250 ft 
91 miles 
86 feet 
675 feet 
97 feet 
98 feet 
103 feet 
15 feet 
April 1969 
Concrete Gravity 
March 1969 
850,000 cfs 
483 feet 
Radial 
50 ft by 61 ft 
8 
39-26

TABLE 39- (Cont.) 
WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT 
PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, 
SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT 
Project 
POWERPLANT 
Length 
Width 
Generating Units: 
Number Installed 
Rating, Each 
Total Capacity Installed 
Maximum Structural Height 
First Power-On-Line 
McNary Lock and Dam, Oregon 
and Washington (see Section 17 of text) 
IMPOUNDMENT 
Elevations: 
Normal Operating Range 
Maximum 
Lake Length 
Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 
Navigation Channel, Depth by Width 
Length of Shoreline 
NAVIGATION LOCK 
Clear Width 
Clear Length 
Lift: 
Minimum 
Average 
Maximum 
Minimum Water Depth Over Sills 
Open to Navigation 
SPILLWAY DAM 
Type of Construction 
Completed 
Maximum Capacity 
Crest Elevation 
Control Gates: 
Type 
Size, Width by Height 
Number 
POWERPLANT 
Length 
Generating Units: 
Number Installed 
Rating, Each 
Total Capacity Installed 
Maximum Structural Height 
First Power-On-Line 
IMPOUNDMENT 
Elevations: 
Normal Operating Range 
Maximum 
Lake Length 
Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 
Acres Navigation Channel, Depth by Width 
Length of Shoreline 
656 feet 
243 feet 
6 
135,000 kW 
810,000 kW 
242 feet 
May 1969 
540-537 feet 
548 feet 
28.7 miles 
6,590 acres 
14 ft by250 ft 
78 miles 
86 feet 
676 feet 
67 feet 
75 feet 
83 feet 
15 feet 
November 1953 
Concrete Gravity 
October 1953 
2,200,000 cfs 
291 feet 
Vertical Lift 
50 ft by 51 ft 
22 
1,348 feet 
14 
70,000 kW 
980,000 kW 
193 feet 
November 1953 
340-335 feet 
356.5 feet 
64 miles 
38,800 
14 ft by 250 ft 
242 miles 
39-27

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM 
JOHNSON BAR LANDING OREGON, WASHINGTON, AND IDAHO 
TABLE 39-K (SEE SECTION 20 OF TEXT) 
Estimated Per- 
Cost (Corps New Work Maintenance to cent 
of Engineers to September 30, 1995 September 30, 1995 Comp- Constr. 
Project Funds Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost leted Started 
Ice I larbor Lock and I )am 
Initial Project $129,578,480 $129,578,4804 $129,578,4804 $114,845,404 $114,639,316 100 FY 57 
Code 711 Rec Facilities 914,256 914,256 914,256 0 0 100 FY 57 
Po er Units 4-6 36,748,021 36,748,021 36,748,021 0 0 100 FY71 
Fish Bypass Program 40,215,0003 20,517,000 20,517,956 0 0 53 FY91 
Totals 207,455,757 187,757,7574 187,758,7134 114,845,404 114,639,316 93 
Little (Goose Lock and 1)am 
InitiParolj ect 160,413,215 160,413,2155 160,413,215 85,807,558 85,702,585 100 FY63 
lo er IJunits 4-6 60,941,807 60,941,807 60,941,807 0 0 100 FY74 
Fish BIvpass Program 39,610,0003 24,639,000 24,614,294 0 0 50 FY89 
Totals 260,965,022 245,994,0225 245,969,3165 85,807,558 85,702,585 92 
Lower (Iranite Lock and 
1)am 321,503,981 321,503,9816 321,503,9796 110,449,468 110,328,532 100 FY65 
Initial Project 63,800 63,800 63,800 0 0 100 FY 84 
Code 710 Rec Facilities 46,212,534 46,212,534 46,212,534 0 0 100 FY 74 
Power Units 4-6 75,813,0003 17,300,000 17,066,595 0 0 29 FY88 
Fish Bypass Program 443,593,315 385,080,3156 384,846,9086 110,449,468 110,328,532 93 
Totals 
Lower Mon Lock and 1)am 
Initial Project 184,712,361 184,712,361' 184,712,361 84,239,008 84,205,949 100 FY61 
Power Jnits 4-6 51,661,371 51,661,371 51,661,371 0 0 100 FY75 
Fish Bypass Program 36,500.0003 28,934,0009 28,885,242 0 0 75 FY 90 
Totals 272,873,732 265,307,732 265,258,974 84,239,008 84,205,949 96 
Open River Lewiston to 
Johnson Bar Landing 34,613 34,6131 34,613 399,5192 394,318 
Open River Pasco to 0 0 0 4,350 4.350 
Lewiston 1,184,922,439 1,084,174,439 1,083,868,524 395,745,307 395,275,050 94 
Totals lExisting Project 
Previous Projects Pasco to 
Lewiston 400,150 400,150 400,150 186,570 186,570 
Totals Authorized Project 1,185,322,589 1,084,574,5898 1,084,268,6743 395,931,877 395,461,620 
SNew work appropriations used foIbmra intenance prior to 1953. 
SIncludes $1,000 appropriated and $1,116 expended in FY 95 for 
project condition survey cost. 
D oes not include mitigation analysis. 
SIncludes $203,000 appropriated and $201,931 expended for Columbia 
River Fish Mitigation Program. 
5 Includes $370,000 appropriated and $358,589 expended for Columbia 
River Fish Mitigation Program. 
SIncludes $1,628,000 appropriated and $1,626,084 expended for 
Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 
' Includes $11,132,000 appropriated and $10,949,493 expended for 
Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 
8 Includes $13,333,000 appropriated and $13,136,097 expended for 
Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 
39-28

ALASKA DISTRICT *
This District consists of the State of Alaska. 
IMPROVEMENTS 
Navigation 
1. Anchorage Harbor, AK .................................... 
2. Dillingham Harbor, AK ................................... 
3. Douglas Harbor, AK .... ................ 
4. Dry Pass Harbor, AK ... ................ 
5. Homer Harbor, AK ............... ................ 
6. Ketchikan - Bar Point Harbor, AK ...................... 
7. Ketchikan, Thomas Basin, AK ............................ 
8. Kodiak Harbor, AK .................................. 
9. Metlakatla Harbor, AK ................................. 
10. Ninilchik Harbor, AK ................................... 
11. Nome Harbor, AK .... ................ 
12. Old Harbor, AK .............................................. 
13. Project Condition Surveys ................................ 
14. Seward Harbor, AK ....................................... 
15. Sitka Harbor, AK .............................................. 
16. St. George, AK ............................................... 
17. St. Paul Island Harbor................................. 
18. Wrangell Harbor, AK ..................................... 
19. Wrangell Narrows, AK .................................. 
40-1 
40-2 
40-2 
40-2 
40-2 
40-3 
40-3 
40-3 
40-4 
40-4 
40-4 
40-5 
40-5 
40-5 
40-5 
40-6 
40-6 
40-6 
40-7 
Flood Control 
20. Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK ............................ 40-7 
21. Chena River Lakes, AK ...... ............ 40-7 
22. Dillingham Emergency Bank 
Stabilization, AK ............................................. 40-8 
23. Homer Spit Erosion, AK .................................... 40-8 
24. Flood Control Work Under 
Special Authorization ... .................. 40-8 
25. Inspection of Completed Flood 
Control Project .............. ..................... 40-8 
Multiple-Purpose With Power 
26. Snettisham , AK ................................................ 40-8 
General Investigations 
27. Survey .............................................................. 40-9 
28. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...................... 40-9 
Tables 
Table 40-A Cost & Financial Statement ..................... 40-10 
Table 40-B Authorizing Legislation ........................... 40-15 
Table 40-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....... 40-17 
Table 40-D Not Applicable 
Table 40-E Other Authorized Flood 
Control Projects ............................... 40-18 
Table 40-F Not Applicable 
Table 40-G Deauthorized Projects ............................. 40-18 
Table 40-H Navigation Work Under Special 
Authorization ........................................ Table 40-19 40-I Project Condition Surveys ........................ 40-19 
Table 40-J Stream Bank Erosion Work Under Special 
Authorization......................................... 40-20 
Navigation 
1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK 
Location. Anchorage is in southcentral Alaska on the 
southeast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near 
its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 16660 and 
16664.) 
Existing project. Provides for dredging along 3,300 foot 
baseline adjacent to the port of Anchorage dock to a depth of 
36 feet below mean lower low water and mean higher high 
water is 29 feet and the extreme range is 42 feet. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
-40-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
Terminal facilities. The facility consists of a POL 
terminal at the southern end and three general cargo 
terminals northward. The northernmost terminal, completed 
during 1976 and 1977, was outside the Federal project limits. 
Extension of the limits from 2,070 feet northward to 3,000 
feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587 and funded in FY 
1978. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging 
was completed for the port during July through September of 
1995. The contract was completed by Swalling Construction 
of Anchorage, Alaska. A total of 244,255 cubic yards of 
dredged material was removed to a project depth of 36 feet 
below mean lower low water. 
2. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK 
Location. Dillingham Harbor is located at the head of 
Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on the right bank of 
Nushagak River, just below its confluence with Wood River; 
about 470 miles northeast of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles 
southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16660.) 
Existing project. A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet 
in area with an entrance channel 250 feet long and 40 feet 
wide in Scandinavian Creek and a rock sill across its outlet. 
Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher 
high water is 19.8 feet. Extreme range is 30 feet. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are four docks at the city of 
Dillingham; three privately owned, one owned by the city. 
Four publicly owned small boat floats located in the Harbor 
basin were installed in June 1982. They are removed before 
fall freeze up and replaced each spring. Facilities are inadequate 
for the number of boats using the harbor. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance 
dredging was accomplished during June 1995, by 
Tango Construction of Homer, Alaska. A total 67,778 
cubic yards of material was removed. 
3. DOUGLAS HARBOR, AK 
Location. Douglas Harbor is located in the Gastineau 
Channel in the Juneau /Douglas area. The project depth is 
-12 feet mean lower low water. (See NOAA/NOSS Chart 
Nos. 17315, 17300, & 16016). 
Existing project. Adopted 3 July 1958, providing a boat 
basin of 5.2 acres with entrance channel both to a depth of - 
12 feet mean lower low water and protected by a rock jetty 
about 90 feet long off the northerly shore of Juneau Isle 
adjacent to the basin entrance. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. The small boat basin provides 
protected moorage for 100 small craft. Douglas harbor is one 
of three Corps of Engineers projects that provide moorage for 
the large commercial fleet and recreational vessels in the 
Juneau/ Douglas area. The government, commercial fishing, 
and tourism provide a unique and diversified economy in the 
metropolitan area. All transportation to the area is by sea or 
air.
Operations during fiscal year. Surveys were conducted 
during the year, and maintenance dredging is scheduled for 
this upcoming year. 
4. DRY PASS HARBOR, AK 
Location. Dry Pass Harbor is bordered on the west by 
Kusciusko Island, and on the east by Prince of Wales Island. 
This channel is 12 feet deep by 70 feet wide. (See USC & 
GS Chart Nos. 17400, 17387, & 17360.) 
Existing project. Adopted 30 August 1935 provides for a 
channel 60 feet wide at 6 feet below mean lower low water 
through 5 shoals between El Capitan Passage and Shakan 
Strait. The River and Harbor Act dated 3 September 1954 
modifies the previous project by providing a channel 70 feet 
in width to a depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water 
through 7 shoals. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. The El Capitan/Dry pass/Shakan 
route provides a protected waterway for fishing vessels, 
towed log rafts, and small boats between the west coast of the 
Prince of Wales Island and Kosciusko Island in southeastern 
Alaska. The economy of the vicinity is based on logging and 
commercial fishing. 
Operations during fiscal year. Surveys were conducted 
during the year, and maintenance dredging is scheduled for 
this upcoming year. 
5. HOMER HARBOR, AK 
Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsula, 152 
miles by water, southwest of Anchorage. The harbor site is 
near the extremity of Homer Spit, which varies to one-quarter 
mile in width and extends 4.5 miles southeasterly from the 
mainland. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16645.) 
-40-2-

ALASKA DISTRICT 
Existing project. Provides for a sheltered small-boat 
harbor, relocated and based within Homer Spit, about 50 
acres in area. Project depth varies from 10 feet mean lower 
low water in the west end of the harbor to 20 feet below 
mean lower low water in the entrance channel and the east 
end. The entrance channel is protected by a main rock 
breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 
238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean 
higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 
feet. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1593 
of Annual Report for 1964.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. The facilities consist of one publicly 
owned and operated wharf capable of handling oceangoing 
vessels for passengers and general cargo. Small boat facilities 
in the basin include publicly owned mooring floats, a publicly 
owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. Construction has 
tripled the size of the harbor. The city of Homer has tripled 
the size of its fish dock located at the southern end of the 
harbor. 
Operation during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular 
maintenance dredging was accomplished by contract during 
September 1995 by Tango Construction of Homer, Alaska. 
A total of 8,672 cubic yards was removed from the Federal 
project plus 2,628 cubic yards from the Coast Guard Dock. 
6. KETCHIKAN - BAR POINT HARBOR, AK 
Location. Bar Point Harbor is located in the Tongass 
Narrows north of Pennock Island in Ketchikan. a small boat 
basin 17.91 acres in area, to depths of -10 and -15 feet mean 
lower low water. 
Existing project. Adopted 2 September 1954, providing 
for the dredging of an additional small boat basin at Bar 
Point, 17.91 acres in area, to depths or -10 and -15 feet mean 
lower low water, and construction of three rock breakwaters 
700, 1,100, and 450 feet in length, topped by concrete gravity 
walls. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Bar Point is used as a base of 
operations for commercial fishing and is capable of 
accommodating 520 vessels. In addition, the harbor is used 
by more than 50 transcient fishing boats as a seasonal base of 
operations. 
Ketchikan is a major fishing port, the site of a wood pulp 
mill, attendant logging operations, and a distribution and 
transportation center for the southern half of southeastern 
Alaska. 
Operations during fiscal year. Surveys were conducted 
during the year, and maintenance dredging is scheduled for 
this upcoming year. 
7. KETCHIKAN, THOMAS BASIN, AK 
Location. Ketchikan, the first major Alaska port north of 
Seattle, is located on the Inside Passage of Southeast Alaska 
about 600 miles north of Seattle and 235 miles south of 
Juneau. 
Existing project. The project was authorized in the 
Rivers and Harbors Act of 3 July 1930 (House Doc. 113, 70th 
Congress, 1st Session), and consists of a 940-foot stone 
breakwater with concrete cap protecting an 11.35 acre 
mooring basin maintained at -10 feet mean lower low water. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with 
Operations during the fiscal year. Maintenance: A 
contract was awarded 11 May 1995 to Ketchikan Ready Mix 
and Quarry of Ketchikan, Alaska for maintenance dredging 
of the harbor and entrance channel. Work is expected to be 
completed by 29 February 1996. (See NOAA/NOS Charts 
17430, 17420, and 16013) 
8. KODIAK HARBOR, AK 
Location. The port of Kodiak is located at 242 and 175 
nautical miles south of Anchorage and Seward, respectively, 
and approximately 1,258 nautical miles northwest of Seattle. 
St. Herman Harbor is located at Near Island across Near 
Island Channel from Kodiak. 
Existing project. The recommended plan has a 1,865-foot 
rubblemound split breakwater with a crest elevation of 22 feet 
above mean lower low water. The main entrance channel is 
located in the split breakwater and has a design width of 200 
feet and design depth of 20 feet below mean lower low water. 
Since the natural water depth of the main entrance channel is 
55 feet below mean lower low water, no dredging is required 
in this Channel. A 100-foot rubblemound stub breakwater is 
recommended next to a secondary entrance channel at the 
north end of the harbor. This secondary entrance channel is 
to be 100 feet wide with a design depth of 12 feet below mean 
lower low water, and will require 4,400 square yards of rock 
excavation. 
The current estimated cost of $14,600,000, of which 
$13,140,000 would be the Federal first cost and $1,538,000 is 
the non-Federal first cost (cash and land easement rights of 
-40-2

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
way). Local interests will pay 10 percent initially plus 10 
percent during a period of up to 30 years. resulting in an 
ultimate non-Federal cost of $2,920,000. 
Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement 
was executed on 6 July 1992. 
Terminal facilities. Thirty'-one piers, wharves, and docks 
are located in the port of Kodiak. Four are located in 
Womens Bay and two in Gibson Cove, west of the main part 
of the city. Twenty-four facilities are along the main water 
front of Kodiak, with thirteen on St. Paul Harbor and eleven 
on Kodiak Harbor, respectively. The remaining facility is the 
St. Herman Small Boat Harbor between Uski and Near 
Islands, directly south of Kodiak Small Boat Harbor. 
Operations during fiscal year. The first contract, to place 
a consolidation pad where the main breakwater will be, was 
awarded on 11 September 1993 and was physically completed 
in September 1994. The second contract, to place the 
breakwaters and excavate the north entrance channel was 
awarded on 3 May 1995 and will be completed in 1996. 
9. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK 
Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of 
Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast of Annette 
Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. 
(See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074, 8075, and 8102.) 
Existing project. Consists of two small boat basins. The 
existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet 
below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound 
breakwater 900 feet long. The new basin consists of two 
rubblemound breakwaters, 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an 
entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 
feet wide, dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower 
low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth 
of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between 
mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 
feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities consist of 
one general cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small boat 
float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are 
one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not 
adequate for mooring the commercial fishing vessels 
operating from Metlakatla. The existing protected harbor 
area is fully utilized. 
Operations during fiscal year. The project is physically 
complete: contractor claims are pending. 
10. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK 
Location. Ninilchik Harbor is located at the mouth of Ninilchik 
River in Cook Inlet, at the village of Ninilchik. The 
community of Ninilchik, AK, is about 40 miles up coast from 
Homer and 112 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See 
NOAA/NOS Chart #16640.) 
Existing project. A small-boat basin 400 feet long by 150 
feet wide is dredged to an elevation of 2 feet above mean 
lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long 
and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean 
lower low water; protected by two rock jetties. Modifications 
for, river channel diversion, the 2 armor rock jetties, and 
beach protection were accomplished in 1967 and 1969. 
Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high 
water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 29.3 feet. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Facilities, which are limited to 
shallow-draft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at 
half-tide or higher, are a cannery dock along Ninilchik River 
available for off loading fish, and small boat floats in the 
project basin, provided by the state of Alaska. Other supplies 
are landed on beach or brought by road from deep draft ports 
in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the 
number of boats presently using the harbor. Expansion of 
facilities would require construction of additional protected 
harbor area. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging of 
the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished during 
May 1995 by Tango Construction of Homer, Alaska. During 
that time 5,750 cubic yards of material was removed. 
11. NOME HARBOR, AK 
Location. Nome Harbor is located at the mouth of the 
Snake River at the city of Nome, AK, on the northerly shore 
of Norton Sound, an arm of the Bering Sea. It is a shallow 
open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor 
and 545 air miles northwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS 
Chart #16206.) 
Existing project. Provides for two jetties, the easterly jetty 
of 951 feet and the westerly jetty not exceeding 676 feet long, 
at the mouth of Snake River; a channel 8 feet at mean lower 
low water, 75 feet wide, from Norton Sound through Snake 
River to mouths of Bourbon and Dry Creeks, in city of Nome, 
ending in a turning basin of the same depth. 250 feet wide 
and 600 feet long; revetting banks of rivers; and protecting 
all existing waterfront improvements on easterly beach by 
means of rock mount seawall 3,350 feet long extending 
1 4

ALASKA DISTRICT 
easterly from east jetty. The project has been completed 
except extension of jetties beyond present 400 and 240 feet, 
which is classified inactive. Range between mean lower low 
water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet and extreme 
tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels are influenced more by 
wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water 
have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 
feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a 
southerly storm. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean 
vessels are lightered to and from shore, a distance of about 2 
miles. Traffic enters the dredged channel and is handled over 
revetment, where a lighterage company has transfer facilities 
which are open to the public. Facilities considered inadequate 
for existing commerce. In July 1984, the city of Nome 
received Department of Army authorization (permit) to 
construct a 3,600-foot gravel filled causeway. Construction of 
the causeway began in July 1985. Due to lack of complete 
funding, the length of the causeway was shortened to 2,700 
feet. Construction was completed in May 1987. Use of this 
causeway for off loading petroleum products was delayed 
until the September 1987 arrival of a required berthing barge. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging 
of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by 
contract with 14,303 cubic yards of material removed 
between July 15 and August 28, 1995. 
12. OLD HARBOR, AK 
Location. Old Harbor is located on the southeast side of 
Kodiak Island 54 miles southwest of the city of Kodiak. (See 
NOAA charts 16592, 16580, and 16013.) 
Existing project. Adopted on 15 June 1966, under Section 
107 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, the 
project includes a small boat basin 200 feet mean lower low 
water; an entrance channel 600 feet long and 60 feet wide 
dredged to a depth of 8 feet below mean lower low water; an 
earth filled dike 1,200 feet long to divert fresh water from 
Big Creek away from the basin area; and a gabion groin 
littoral drift barrier 240 feet long. Construction began in July 
1967. Raising of the gabion groin structure was accomplished 
in August and September 1971. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include a small 
boat basin which provides protected moorage for 
approximately 40 commercial fishing vessels and a city 
owned dock. 
Operations during fiscal year. Dredging of the harbor 
and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 
3.370 cubic yards of material removed between 19 November 
and 16 December 1994. 
13. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS 
Preliminary and detailed surveys were completed to 
determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small 
navigation projects, channels and tributaries of major rivers 
not within major project boundaries. Total costs for fiscal 
year were $522,162. (See Table 40-I) 
14. SEWARD HARBOR, AK 
Location. Seward is located on the north shore of 
Resurrection Bay on the east side of the Kenai Peninsula and 
is approximately 75 air miles from Anchorage. (See 
NOAA/NOS Charts 16682, 16680, and 16013). 
Existing project. The project was originally authorized 
in the Rivers and Harbors Act of 3 July 1930 (House Doc 
109, 70th Congress, 1st Session), and modified by the Rivers 
and Harbors Act of 30 August 1935. Following the 
destruction caused by the earthquake of April 1964, the 
project was reauthorized under reconstruction of the previous 
4.75 acre basin at -15 feet mean lower low water, 
construction of a 12.45 acre expansion basin at -12.5 feet 
mean lower low water with an entrance channel at -15 feet 
mean lower low water, all protected by two rubblemound 
breakwaters 1,060 and 1,750 feet in length. Construction 
was completed in June 1965. Provision for future expansion 
of the harbor was included in the authorization. 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract 
was awarded 17 November 1995 to Nahalem River Dredging 
of Nahalem, Oregon for maintenance dredging of the harbor 
and entrance channel. All dredging work and the postdredge 
survey were completed on 2 February 1996. Final 
payment is expected by 31 March 1996. 
15. SITKA HARBOR, AK 
Location. The city of Sitka is located in southeastern 
Alaska, about 95 miles south-southwest of Juneau. It is 
situated on the western coast of 1,600 square mile Baranof 
Island. Sitka is about 20 miles from the open Pacific Ocean 
on the east side of Sitka Sound. 
Existing project. The recommended plan, also known as 
the Channel Rock plan, will consist of three rubblemound

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
breakwaters constructed across the northern end of western 
Anchorage, and an inner harbor facility placed adjacent to 
Thomsan Harbor. This project will create a large protected 
harbor in which moorage basins could be developed using 
minimal or no wave protection structures. The three 
breakwaters would bc 480 feet. 1.200 feet, and 320 feet long. 
Navigation openings in the breakwater, 325 feet and 190 feet 
wide at the design depth, would be located at natural 
channels where water depths are 50 to 55 feet at mean lower 
low water. Two gaps would allow for vessel traffic 
separation, which may be particularly important when log 
rafts or barges are being towed through western Anchorage. 
The two breakwaters forming the southern opening will 
overlap to minimize ocean swell in Thomsan Harbor. The 
breakwaters would be placed directly on the submerged rock 
reefs forming the northern boundary of western Anchorage. 
Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was 
executed on 7 December 1993. 
Operations during fiscal year. The construction contract 
was awarded on 18 February 1994. 
16. ST. GEORGE, AK 
Location. The city of St. George is located on St. George 
Island, the southernmost island of the Pribilof Islands, near 
the edge of the southwest Bering Sea shelf. 
Existing project. The project was authorized in the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1993, 
P.L. 102-377. The work consists of excavating the St. George 
Harbor entrance channel to 20 feet below mean lower low 
water in accordance with cost-sharing provisions in P.L. 99- 
662. 
Local cooperation. The portion of the project was done by 
the Local Sponsor under Section 215, P.L. 90-483 with 
reimbursement to the Local Sponsor by the Government for 
its share on completion. 
Operations during the fiscal year. The Local Sponsor 
completed the portion of the project under the Section 215 
agreement. Work on the remainder of the project is 
scheduled to be initiated in FY 1997. 
17. ST. PAUL ISLAND HARBOR, AK 
Location. St. Paul Island Harbor is located on the shore 
of Village Cove. the southern side of St. Paul Island, the 
largest and most populated island of the Pribilof group in the 
central southeast Bering Sea. 
Existing project. A St. Paul Harbor project was P.L. 99- 
662, based on a 1982 Corps of Engineers feasibility report. 
Since that report was published, new wave and climatic 
information was gained through field measurement and 
through a November 1984 storm that severely damaged a city 
built breakwater at St. Paul. American vessels have also 
assumed control of the groundfish harvest in the area more 
rapidly than expected, while crab stocks and catches have 
declined markedly. St. Paul also constructed 750 feet of 
breakwater and a 200-foot dock at the harbor site. On 31 
March 1989, Assistant Secretary of the Army signed an 
Agreement under Section 204(e) of P.L. 99-662 which states 
that the government would pay 80 percent of the costs of 
general navigation features of the Authorized Project. The 
agreement was unique in that the city had to successfully 
build the harbor with their own funds and the government 
would reimburse them upon acceptance by the Corps of 
Engineers. The general navigation features consist of: (1) 
1,050 feet of rubblemound breakwater with a finished 
elevation of 37 feet above mean lower low water; (2) 1,000 
feet of rubblemound detached breakwater with a crest 
elevation of 18 feet above mean lower low water; and (3) a 
200-foot-wide maneuvering area at a depth of 18 feet below 
mean lower low water. Construction commenced in May 
1989 and was completed in December 1989. The general 
navigation features were completed in 1989 and accepted by 
the government. Coordination was performed with the city 
for compliance with the Local Cooperation Agreement. The 
city was reimbursed in March 1990 in the amount of 
$18,150,000. 
Local cooperation. A 204(e) agreement was signed by the 
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) on 30 March 
1989. One minor item remains incomplete. The agreement 
was amended on 30 April 1992 to allow the local sponsor an 
additional 5 years to complete the inner harbor facility. 
Operations during fiscal year. During the month of 
August 1995 twenty four 20-ton armor stones were replaced 
in a subsistence area on the breakwater by Bering Pacific/Red 
Samm J/V for the price of $212,069. A reconnaissance 
report proposing enlargement of the maneuvering area and 
improvement of the breakwaters was completed in July 1995. 
18. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK 
Location. Wrangell Harbor is located on the northwest 
side of Wrangell Island, 824 miles from Seattle and 160 
miles from Juneau. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey 
Charts Nos. 8164, 8161, and 8201.) 
Existing project. The project consists of a rubblemound 
breakwater 300 feet long to protect the southern portion of 
the outer harbor; a mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet 
wide, and 10 feet deep below mean lower low water within 
the protected area: an inner basin in the tide flat area east of 
401 )3

ALASKA DISTRICT 
Shakes Island, 325 feet wide and 550 feet long; a connecting 
channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long; a 
connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet 
long from the outer mooring basin all at a depth of 10 feet at 
mean lower low water; and construction of a rock mound 
breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Shakes Island. 
The range between mean lower low water and mean higher 
high water is 15.7 feet. The extreme tidal range is 26 feet. 
Heavy swells, dangerous to small fishing boats, are caused by 
the wind, which causes an additional rise of about one foot. 
Construction of the breakwater north of Shakes Island was 
placed on inactive status as material to be used from the 
inner basin was unsuitable and the breakwater considered 
unnecessary for safe moorage of vessels. The cost of this 
portion was last revised in 1956 and estimated to be $6,500. 
(See table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Terminal facilities. There are eight wharves and floats in 
Wrangell Harbor. Two privately owned wharves serving 
general cargo and passenger terminals, one of which includes 
a cold storage facility, are open for public use. The remaining 
wharves serve various industrial purposes. One of the floats 
is publicly owned and is open for public use for mooring and 
servicing of small craft, and two privately owned floats serve 
oil handling facilities. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging 
of the harbor was accomplished by contract in October 1993, 
yielding approximately 10,000 cubic yards of material. The 
harbor was last dredged in 1968. 
19. WRANGELL NARROWS, AK 
Location. This project is located between Mitkof and 
Kupreanof islands adjacent to Petersburg and is about 120 
miles southeast of Juneau. The initial work completed in 
1934 provided for a 24-mile channel 200 feet wide and 21 
feet deep. Modifications finished in 1963 increased the 
width to 300 feet, the depth to 24 feet, and added an 
anchorage basin of 20.7 acres that is 26 feet deep near 
midpoint in the passage. 
Local cooperation. A 1970 modification at Turn Point 
near Petersburg increased the depth to 27 feet and widened 
the channel through the turn. Maintenance dredging at Turn 
Point was performed in fiscal year 1979. The District 
removed two large rocks that posed navigational hazards in 
March 1988 at Green Rock. In August 1989, the District 
performed maintenance dredging at Turn Point, mile 1.5 to 
mile 2.5; Green Rock, mile 12.5; burnt Island, mile 17; Spile 
Rock, mile 18; and Battery Islets, mile 20. 
Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging of 
the channel near Petersburg and in the vicinity of Turn Point 
was accomplished by Aqua Marine constructors, Inc. of 
Portland Oregon. During the months June through July 1995 
41,000 cubic yards of material was removed. 
Flood Control 
20. BETHEL BANK STABILIZATION, AK 
Location. Bethel, AK is located in southwestern Alaska 
on the north bank of the Kuskokwim River 400 miles west of 
Anchorage. 
Existing project. The project consists of rock riprap toe 
protection to be installed on the unprotected river bank 
and at locations where existing city construction bulkheads 
are threatened by erosion. This includes 3,500 feet of 
unprotected riverbank and 3,000 feet of previously installed 
bulkheads. 
Location cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement 
*was signed on 3 March 1994. 
Terminal facilities. The POL tank farm is situated at the 
downstream end of the project and the city's general cargo 
dock is at the upstream end of the project. 
Operations during fiscal year. The construction 
contract was awarded on 26 May 195. Emergency erosion 
protection for the Bethel Cargo Dock and the Mission Road 
Bulkhead began in July 1995 and continued through FY 
1995 due to accelerated erosion that accumulated after spring 
runoff. 
21. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK 
Location. Chena River Lakes is located in the vicinity of 
Fairbanks, AK, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena 
River, Little Chena River, and their tributaries. (See USGS 
map Fairbanks, Cl, Dl, D2, and Big Delta D6.) 
Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 
Existing project. Moose Creek Dam has been constructed 
17 miles east of Fairbanks with control works on the Chena 
River. The dam itself extends from a bluff one mile north of 
the Chena River and south past the control works for 
approximately six miles to the Tanana River. The dam 
connects with a completed 22 mile levee system along the 
north boundary of the Tanana river to point south and west of 
Fairbanks. Estimated Federal costs is $210,000,000, Little 
Chena Dam was submitted for deauthorization in September 
1990. 
-40-7-

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
Operations during fiscal year. Debris removal from 
trash racks was accomplished during June and July 1995 by 
contract with H & H Contractors and Alaska Contracting and 
consulting. Phase I construction of a bike path was 
accomplished during September 1995 with optional items 
expected to be completed by July 1996. 
22. DILLINGHAM EMERGENCY BANK 
STABILIZATION, AK 
Location. Dillingham, with a population of 2,100 is a 
major regional fishing community in Bristol Bay in 
southwest Alaska. It is 350 air-miles southwest of 
Anchorage. Erosion is a constant threat to Dillingham, 
which is on a bluff overlooking the Nushagak River. Erosion 
rates are estimated from historical data to be about 9 feet per 
year. Public and private property, burial grounds and water 
and sewer lines could soon be effected without the project. A 
steel sheet pile bulkhead approximately 1500 feet long will 
extend to Snag Point. 
Existing project. A Section 215 Agreement was executed 
with the City of Dillingham to reimburse them the balance of 
the $100,000 (approx. $89,000) from the original authorized 
project after they relocated the utility lines being undermined 
at the Snag Point location. 
A draft letter report was prepared outlining what can be 
done with the $421,000 allocated in FY 1995. 
Location cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement 
(PCA) negotiated and executed as soon as funding for the 
construction contract is assured. The sponsor would need to 
contribute lands, easements, right of ways, and a 
construction contract would then be awarded. 
Operations during fiscal year. Local interests relocated 
water and sewer lines that were being undermined near Snag 
Point. 
23. HOMER SPIT, AK 
Location. The project is located near the town of Homer, 
Alaska, 120 miles southwest of Anchorage. It is a 4.5 mile 
long finger of land that varies in width from 30 to 500 yards 
wide extending into Kachemak Bay. 
Existing Project. The authorized project, which was 
constructed in 1994, consists of rock revetment along 1,400 
feet project cost was received. 
Local Cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement 
was signed detailing cost sharing of the project. 
Operations during fiscal year. The contract was awarded 
on 21 September 1992. The contractor spent the year trying 
to get an approved quarry. Notice to Proceed was given on 
12 November 1992. Construction was completed in September 
1994. 
24. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
Navigation actiivities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 
86-645 (Preauthorization). (See Table 40-H at end of 
chapter). 
Stream Bank Erosion activities pursuant to Section 14, 
Public Law 79-526 (Preauthorization). (See Table 40-J at end 
of the chapter). 
Project Modification for Improvement of Environment 
pursuant to Section 1135(b), PL 99-362 as amended: 
Fiscal year costs were: Initial Appraisals, General $9,702; St. 
Paul Salt Lagoon, AK $595; Valdez Harbor Modification, AK, 
$56,517, a total of $66,814. 
Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood 
fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, 
and antecedent legislation). 
Federal costs for the fiscal year were $257,025 for disaster 
preparedness, and field investigations. 
25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD 
CONTROL PROJECTS 
Inspections were made of the following flood control 
works: Tanana River Levee at Fairbanks, Talkeetna River at 
Talkeetna; Lowell Creek at Seward; Klutna River at Copper 
Center; Skagway River at Skagway; Gold Creek at Juneau; 
and Yukon River at Galena. An inspection was made of the 
shore protection works at Nome. 
Multiple-Purpose With Power 
26. SNETTISHAM, AK 
Location. The project is located at the mouth of the Speel 
River, between Crater Lake to the west and Long Lake to the 
north, 29 nautical miles southeast of Juneau. (See Coast 
Geodetic Survey chart 8227.) 
Existing project. Snettisham is a multi-stage power 
project. The initial stage, which was completed in 1977, 
41-0

ALASKA DISTRICT 
tapped Long Lake and included an underground powerhouse 
with two 23.4 megawatt units and a transmission line to 
Juneau, AK. The project was turned over to the Alaska Power 
Administration for operation and maintenance. The second 
stage, which is nearly completed, provided a tunnel to Crater 
Lake and added a third unit. The final phase will provide a 
dam on Long lake to increase storage and the energy 
capability of Long Lake. The Long Lake Dam is currently 
unscheduled. The existing 
Long Lake (elevation 815 feet) water is transported through 
an approximately horizontal 13 foot diameter tunnel 
8,400 feet long and a 1,400 foot penstock dropping at a 46 
degree angle to the underground power house at tidewater to 
drive two turbines with a combined generating capacity of 
47,600 kilowatts. Power from two generators is supplied to 
Juneau by a 13.8 kilovolt overhead transmission line and a 
submarine cable traversing Taku inlet. The Crater Lake stage 
of construction tapped Crater Lake (elevation 1,002 feet) to 
drive a third turbine installed in the existing underground 
powerhouse. An additional nameplated-rated generating 
capacity of 34,500 kilowatts was added. Estimated cost of the 
first stage and second stage construction is $148,284,000. 
Local cooperation. None Required. 
Operations during fiscal year. The Remote Supervisory 
Control and Data Acquisition Contract (SCADA) was 
completed in September 1993. A successful lake tap occurred 
on 21 October 1988. Power-on-line initially occurred in May 
1989, but was shut down for repairs to the turbine and 
generator. It has since been brought back on line. The 
project is physically complete. Audit and Mapping is 
currently being completed in preparation for transfer to 
Alaska Power Authority in FY 1995. 
General Investigation 
27. SURVEYS 
Fiscal year costs were $980,826 for navigation studies, 
$39,643 for flood damage prevention studies, $14,696 for 
special studies, $956 for comprehensive studies, $ 229,782 
for review of authorized project, $116,744 for miscellaneous 
studies, $27,727 for coordination studies with other agencies 
and non -Federal interests, a total of $1,410,374. In addition, 
contributed funds were expended for the following: $231,718 
for navigation studies and $26,976 for coordination studies 
with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of 
$258,892. 
28. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC 
DATA 
Technical assistance, information, flood plain management 
guidance, and other flood plain management services 
have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal 
agencies, local communities, state agencies, Architectural 
Engineering firms, lending institutions, and private 
individuals at a fiscal year cost of $167,090. 
Fiscal year costs for Hydrologic Studies were $15,937. 
-40-9-

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total to 
In Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 30 Sep 95 
Text 
1. Anchorage Harbor, AK 
(Contrib. Funds) 
2. Dillingham Harbor, AK 
(Contrib. Funds) 
3. Douglas Harbor, AK 
4. Dry Pass, AK 
5. Homer Harbor, AK 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
Rehab. 
Contrib. 
Cost 
1,107,100 
1,127,641 
993,000 1,095,000 
752,344 1,451,211 
52,433 
77,462 
396,200 440,000 
388,230 390,923 
239,700 
239,829 
188,000 
187,555 
423,000 
459,008 
188,000 
182,617 
-40-10 
533,235 
533,235 
1,150,500 
1,171,503 
28,629,207 
28,622,467 
638,080 
638,080 
548,790 
580,209 
9,306,282 
9,314,959 
319,000 
338,244 
1,700 
1,700 
46,000 
44,456 
46,000 
44,456 
13,000 
12,949 
13,000 
12,949 
160,000 
164,633 
3,512,350 
3,512,350 
5,304,113 
4,996,856 
67,974 
67,974

ALASKA DISTRICT 
TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
(Continued) 
See 
Sectio Total to 
n In Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 30 Sep 95 
Text 
6. Ketchikan Bar 
Point Harbor, AK 
7. Ketchikan - 
Thomas Basin, AK 
8. Kodiak Harbor, AK 
(Contrib. Funds) 
9. Metlakatla Harbor, 
AK 
(Contrib. Funds) 
10. Ninilchik Harbor, 
AK 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp,. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Contrib. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
250,000 3,999,798 
223,394 3,182,053 
605,000 
541,874 
644 
2Q7,3QQ 
1539,60Q1 
140,000 191,000 
191,922 191,331 
-40-'11- 
98,000 
89,686 
-2,800 
5,483 
95,200 
95,169 
150,000 
75,010 
220,000 
457,183 
40,000 
38,354 
54,000 
127,386 
1,250,817 
1,788,611 
250,000 
262,618 
-2,029 
204,000 
202,396 
7,240,397 
7,152,516 
895,000 
842,846 
5,075,441 
5,075,374 
148,520 
148,520 
830,644 
704,101 
428,720 
428,720 
4,838,039 
4,830,695 
-20,550 
160,000 
153,598

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
(Continued) 
See 
Section 
In 
Text 
Project 
11. Nome Harbor, 
AK 
(Contrib. 
Funds) 
12. Old Harbor, AK 
14. Seward Harbor, 
AK 
15. Sitka Harbor, 
AK 
(Contrib. 
Funds) 
16. St. George, AK 
(Contrib. 
Funds) 
Funding 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New 
Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
FY 92 
271,300 
241,890 
FY 93 
430,535 
330,879 
2,500 
2,500 
314,157 
61,632 
50,000 
48,751 
New 
Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
New 
Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
395,144 
326,529 
203,000 
143,493 
FY 94 
66,500 
182,261 
2,500 
5,000 
-36,000 
206,259 
5,120,000 
3,383,795 
1,250,000 
400,000 
2,797,000 
865,187 
FY 95 
776,906 
795,544 
-10,267 
47,000 
45,550 
1,083,000 
2,540,487 
-11,600 
254,256 
53,241 
173 
Total to 
30 Sep 95 
1,348,240 
1,348,240 
10,783,486 
10,863,980 
177,500 
180,000 
132,946 
370,415 
-46,267 
400,837 
47,000 
45,550 
6,648,144 
6,299,562 
1,238,400 
654,256 
7,000,000 
4,985,321 
3,004,000 
2,824,171 
-40-12

ALASKA DISTRICT 
TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
(Continued) 
See 
Section Total to 
In Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 30 Sep 95 
Text 
17. St. Paul 
Island Harbor, 
AK 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
18. Wrangell New Work 
Harbor, AK Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
19. Wrangell 
Narrows, AK 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
20. Bethel Bank 
Stabilization, 
AK 
(Contributed 
Funds) 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
21. Chena River New Work 
Lakes, AK Approp. 
Cost 
Maint. 
Approp. 
Cost 
(Contributed New Work 
Funds) Approp. 
Cost 
340,000 
334,021 
424,854 
312,456 
8,163 
-129,571 
2,564 
297,000 
41,248 
62,157 
331,701 
61,000 
47,819 
499,548 8,185,000 
447,127 137,381 
-100,000 
21,358 
-2017 
499,500 
507,516 
4,300,238 
1,500,000 
1,097,556 
25,000 
1,657,800 1,638,000 1,871,744 
1,582,178 1,319,205 2,113,055 
1,880,400 
2,279,275 
22. Dillingham 
Emergency 
Bank 
Stabilization 
227,000 
225,977 
19,635,200 
19,593,945 
227,000 
225,977 
537,020 
537,020 
1,239,380 
6,646,173 
560,500 
555,335 
10,266,854 
6,358,303 
1,500,000 
1,097,556 
214,063,928 
214,047,562 
8,360,144 
8,476,289 
2,182,300 
2,145,929 
New Work 
Approp. 
Cost 
5,569 
5,379 
221,000 
80,974 
226,569 
86,410 
-40-13-

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
See 
Section Total to 
In Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 30 Sep 95 
Text 
23. Homer Spit New Work 
Erosion, AK Approp. 
Cost 
(Contrib. New Work 
Funds) Approp. 
Cost 
26. Snettisham, New Work 
AK Approp. 
Cost 
110,000 
110,423 
1,850,000 
24 
4,787,000 
5,571,354 
2,030,000 
131,176 
910,000 
2,442,672 
7 1,568,520 
-25,000 
520,309 
150,000 
284,262 
-270,000 
92,028 
-344,478 
-94,478 
30,000 
37,302 
3,740,000 
3,744,459 
1,505,522 
1,481,324 
143,364,550 
143,357,764 
41- i 
TABLE 40-A 
(Cntinued)

ALASKA DISTRICT 
Table 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
Jul. 3, 1958 
Oct. 22, 1976 
Jul. 3, 1958 
ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK 
Deep winter harbor, adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet 
below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties.' 
Extension of project limits. 
DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK 
Basin 230,000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above mean 
lower low water along Scandinavian Creek, with entrance channel 
1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. 
HOMER HARBOR, AK 
Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower 
low water, and rock breakwater 1,260 feet long. 
Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by 
March 27, 1964 earthquake, by construction of basin 10 
acres in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth 
over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwaters, 1,018 feet and 238 
feet long. 
Increased width and depth of entrance channel and an enlarged 
staging area. Basin enlarged from 16.5 to 50 acres. 
KODIAK HARBOR, AK 
Breakwater 1,900 feet long with an entrance channel 930 feet long 
and 20 feet deep to serve 45 acres of moorage in 
St. Herman's Bay. 
METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK 
Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acre in extent to a depth of 10 feet 
below plane of mean lower low water, construction of 
rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. 
Entrance channel and two rubblemound breakwaters enclosing a 
7.0 acre basin. 
NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK 
Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet above 
mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet 
wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected 
by 410 foot jetty. 
NOME HARBOR, AK 
Two jetties, easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long revetment, 
channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. 
Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet wide and 
600 feet long. 3 
Seawall 
-40-15- 
H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 
P.L. 94-587 
H. Doc. 390, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 
H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 
P.L. 88-451 
Section 107, P.L. 86-645 
Authorized by Chief of Engineers, 
Nov. 13, 1981 
Section 202, P.L. 99-662 
S.Doc. 6, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Section 102, Water Resource 
Development Act of 1990, 
P.L. 101-640, 101st Cong. 
H.Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sess. 
Section 201, P.L. 89-298 
S. Doc. 92-64, 92d Cong., 2d Sess.2 
Authorized Oct. 12, 1972 
H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 
H.Doc. 1932, 64th Cong., 1st Sess.2 
H.Doc. 404, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., 
and Rivers and Harbors Committee 
Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. 
Reports of Chief of Engineers 
dated March 8, 1948 
Jul. 2, 1958 
Aug. 19, 1964 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 28, 1990 
9. 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Oct. 27, 1965 
10. 
Jul. 3, 1958 
11. 
Aug. 8, 1917 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Jun. 16, 1948

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
See Date 
Section Authorizing 
in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 
OLD HARBOR, AK 
Dredging of small boat basin 200 feet by 700 feet and an entrance 
channel 60 feet by 600 feet to a depth of 8 feet below mean lower 
low water. 
SITKA HARBOR, AK 
Boat harbor consisting of 3 rubblemound breakwaters. 
ST. GEORGE, AK 
Dredging the maneuvering area from an average depth of 3 feet 
above mean lower low water to 18 feet below mean lower low 
water and dredging the entrance channel from an average depth of 
14 feet below mean lower low water to 20 feet below mean lower 
low water. 
ST. PAUL ISLAND, AK 
Add 1,050 feet of breakwater at existing crest height, 37 below 
feet mean lower low water and 1,000 feet long with a crest height 
of 18 above mean lower low water. 
WRANGELL HARBOR, AK 
Breakwater 300 feet long to protect southern portion of harbor. 
Mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep. 
Inner basin and connecting channel from the existing mooring 
basin, both 10 feet deep at mean lower low water, and breakwater 
320 feet long on the reef north of Snakes Island. 
BETHEL BANK STABILIZATION, AK 
Streambank protection by placing riprap along 8,500 feet of riverbank. 
HOMER SPIT, AK 
Extension of an existing rubblemound revetment along an existing 
sheetpile wall to provide protection and nourishment along a 1400 
foot portion of State highway. 
SNETTISHAM, AK 
Multi-purpose dam, with powerhouse and transmission facilities. 
Section 107 of The Rivers and Harbors 
Act of 1960, Public Law 
86-645, H.R. 7634, 86th Cong. 
Water Resource Development Act of 
1992, H.Doc. 103-37, 103rd Cong., 
1st Sess. 
Section 107 of The Rivers and Harbors 
Act of 1960, Public Law 
86-645, as amended. 
Section 202, P.L. 99-662 
H.Doc. 161, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. 
H.Doc. 202, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. 
H.Doc. 284, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 
Section 202, P.L. 99-662 
Sec. 101, Water Resource Development 
Act of 1990, 
P.L. 101-640, 101st Cong. 
H.Doc. 40, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 
1. Purchase of dredge and deepwater jetties deauthorized 
November 6. 1977 under section 12, Public Law 93-251. 
2. Contains latest published map. 
3. Extension of jetties classified "inactive". 
4. Little Chena Dam deauthorized in 1991. 
-40-16- 
Table 40-B 
(Continued) 
12. 
Jun. 15, 1966 
15. 
Oct. 31, 1992 
16. 
Nov. 17, 1986 
17. 
Nov. 17, 1986 
18. 
Sep. 22, 1922 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Mar. 2, 1945 
Nov. 17, 1986 
Nov. 28, 1990 
20. 
23. 
26. 
Oct, 23, 1962 
_ i, ---

ALASKA DISTRICT 
TABLE 40-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 
I 
-40-17- 
Project 
Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AKI 
Bar Point Harbor, AK2 
Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK 
Cook Inlet Shoals, AK 
Cordova Harbor, AK2 
Cordova, AK 
Craig Harbor, AK 
Douglas Harbor, AK 
Dry Pass, AK 
Egegik River, AK 
Elfin Cove, AK 
Gastineau Channel, AK 
Haines Harbor, AK2 
Homer Harbor, AK2 
Hoonah Harbor, AK 
Humboldt Harbor, AK 
Iliuliuk Harbor, AK 
Juneau Harbor, AK 
Kake Harbor, AK 
Kasilof Harbor, AK2 
Ketchikan Harbor, AK 
Kodiak Harbor, AK 
Mekorykuk, AK 
Mt. Point Breakwater, AK 
Myers Chuck Harbor, AK 
Naknek River, AK 
Neva and Olga Straits, AK 
Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK2 
Pelican Harbor, AK 
Petersburg Harbor, AK 
Port Alexander, AK 
Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, AK2 
Rocky Pass, AK 
St. Michael Canal, AK 
Seldovia Harbor, AK 
Sergius Whitestone, AK 
Seward Harbor, AK 
Sitka Harbor, AK 
Skagway Harbor, AK 
Stikine River, AK 
Valdez Harbor, AK 
Wrangell Narrows, AK 
1. Abandonment recommended in H.Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st 
Sess. 
2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 
3. In addition, $272,779 of State funds. 
4. Includes $656,240 for Sec. 107 project. 
5. In addition, $925,500 of State funds. 
6. In addition, $973,875 of State funds. 
7. In addition, $857,000 of State funds. 
8. Includes $594,163 for rehabilitation. 
Status 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Inactive 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Inactive 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
Completed 
For Last Cost to Sep. 31 
Full Report Op 
See Annual 
Report for Construction Maint 
1920 128,896 
1983 2,000,0003 
1994 1,520,272 4 
1977 1,220,000 
1994 843,534 3 
1986 9,642,000 
1994 1,033,5004 
1963 282,019 
1983 943,351 
1972 4,441 
1959 154,191 
1964 789,461 1 
1977 1,000,0005 
1987 2,000,000 
1983 4,255,0006 
1994 3,679,6832 
1941 66,037 
1974 1,381,1502 
1991 870,700 
1975 109,848 
1979 1,602,417 3 
1973 1,891,2128 
1986 1,372,139 
1993 674,40012 
1970 9,700 
1961 20,789 
1960 155,009 
1972 370,415 
1964 369,683 
1972 252,932 
1949 17,000 
1993 1,825,31113 
1960 337,668 
1916 377,062 
1974 1,051,8839 
1973 1,798,010 
1973 712,3691� 
1973 1,611,009 
1972 133,180 
1987 
1968 649,740" 2 
1979 3,562,343 3 
9. Includes $400,000 for rehabilitation. 
10. Includes $90,026 for rehabilitation and $2,528 Code 710. 
Recreation facilities at Completed projects. 
11. Includes $73,000 for rehabilitation and $2,713 Code 710. 
Recreation facilities at Completed projects. 
12. Excludes $167,792 of Contributed Funds Authorized under 
Section 107. 
13. Excludes $271,964 of Contributed Funds Authorized under 
Section 107. 
0, 1994 
eration 
and 
enance 
2,154 
33,994 
5,000 
94,546 
78,303 
23,466 
3,107 
02,701 
280,536 
260,991 
31,256 
37,946 
132,946 
18,973 
26,800 
560 
5,518 
1,934 
219,789 
15,400 
32,665 
8,804 
221,498 
09,260

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 40-E 
OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 
Full Report Operation 
See Annual and 
Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance 
Bethel Bank, Kuskokwim River' Completed 1985 553,970 
Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK Completed 1943 557,000 
Gold Creek, AK Completed 1975 876,0062 4,301 
Klutina River, Copper Center, AK3 Completed 1973 260,681 
Lowell Creek, AK4 Completed 1945 416,3825 30,771 
Salmon River. AK Completed 1963 37,77067 162,9258 
Talkeetna River, AK Completed 1981 516,694 
1. Section 14. 5. In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 
2. In addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 6. Includes $34,197 of PWA funds. 
3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 7. In addition, $7,000 expended from contributed funds. 
4. During FY88, $551,690 was expended from FC and CE. 8. In addition, $27,400 expended from contributed funds. 
TABLE 40-G 
DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 
For Last 
Full Report Federal Contributed 
See Annual Date Funds Funds 
Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended 
Allison Lake, AK (Valdez Hydropower) 1992 
Anchorage Harbor, AK (Uncompleted Portion) 1967 1977 
Bradley Lake, AK 1983 1983 1982 46,701,000 
Ketchikan Harbor, AK (West Breakwater) 1979 1979 
Port Alexander, AK (Inner Harbor) 1949 1977 
Tolovana River, AK (Snagging) 1931 1977 
Little Chena River Dam 1983 1990 
Long Lake Dam 1975 1990 
Myers Chuck Harbor, AK 1970 1991 9,700 
Scammon Bay, AK 1992 
Skagway River, AK 1966 1991 26,385 
40- 18-

ALASKA DISTRICT 
TABLE 40-H 
NAVIGATION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, 
PUBLIC LAW 86-645, AS AMENDED 
(PREAUTHORIZATION) 
Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs 
King Cove, AK 
Larsen Bay, AK 
Metlakatla, AK 
Ouzinkie, AK 
Seward ,AK 
Tatitlek, AK 
Valdez, AK 
Whittier, AK 
Williamsport, AK 
46,630 
29,868 
43,155 
78,494 
81,191 
46,474 
58,252 
101,593 
85,459 
TOTAL 571,116 
TABLE 40-I 
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS 
Name of Project Date Date Survey Conducted 
Ketchikan, Bar Point January 1994 
Ketchikan, Thomas Basin February 1994 
Hoonah Harbor February 1994 
Skagway Harbor May 1994 
Seward Harbor April 1994 
Seldovia April 1994 
Wrangell Narrows Channel (Mi. 122 to 18.4) May 1994 
Cordova Harbor June 1994 
Valdez Harbor June 1994 
-40-19-

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1995 
TABLE 40-J 
STREAM BANK EROSION WORK UNDER 
SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 
EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, 
PUBLIC LAW 79-526, AS AMENDED 
(PREAUTHORIZATION) 
Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs 
Metlakatla Annette Island. AK 63,138 
Deering, AK 26,962 
Metlakatla, AK 163,090 
Noatak, AK 173 
Emmonak, AK 21,874 
TOTAL 275,237 
-40 --20

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* 
The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was 
created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The 
Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the 
Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries 
(MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three 
officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former 
Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), 
and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. 
All members are appointed by the President 
with the advice and consent of the Senate. 
During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: 
BG Robert B. Flowers, President, Mr. Sam E. Angel, 
appointed Sep. 25, 1979; Mr. R. D. James, civil engineer, 
appointed Dec. 1, 1981; Mr. Frank H. Walk, 
appointed Oct. 22, 1987; BG Albert J. Genetti, Jr., 
appointed Oct. 9, 1992, Commander, Ohio River 
Division; RADM John C. Albright, Member Designee, 
NOAA; COL Gerald E. Galloway, U.S. Army, 
appointed Oct. 28, 1989; COL John F. Castonguay, 
served as Secretary of the Commission. 
The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary 
of the Army and supervision of the Chief of 
Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for 
flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries 
and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they 
are affected by Mississippi River backwater, 
between Head of Passes, LA (mile 0), and Cape 
Girardeau, MO (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi 
mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with 
prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation 
between Cairo, IL (954 miles A{P), and 
Baton Rouge, LA (234 miles AJIP); and for stabilization 
of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the 
Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also 
is charged with prosecution of certain flood control 
works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as 
far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape 
Girardeau, MO, and Rock Island, IL (1,487 miles 
AIP), and with prosecution of improvements on 
designated tributaries and outlets below Cape 
Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, 
and related water uses. Authorized operations 
of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted 
by District Engineers of New Orleans, 
Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts within the areas 
described below, in accordance with approved directives 
and programs and congressional appropriations 
therefor. 
New Orleans District: Mississippi River project 
levees and river channel stabilization as required 
from Head of Passes, mile 0 to 320 AHP, construction 
of five salinity-control structures for fish and 
wildlife enhancement, four in lower Mississippi 
River Delta region, and one in the Mississippi- 
Louisiana Estuarine Area; Bonnet Carre' and Morganza 
Floodways; maintenance and improvements 
of Mississippi River navigation channel from Baton 
Rouge, LA (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge 
Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of 
Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River 
to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers; 
Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and 
drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and 
tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper 
Pointe Coupee Loop area; flood protection in eastern 
Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA; 
and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River 
to Teche-Vermilion Basins. 
Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees 
and river channel stabilization as required from 
upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) 
in vicinity of Black Hawk, LA, to Coahoma-Bolivar 
County line, MS (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to 
vicinity of mouth of White River, AR (mile 599 
AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas 
River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, AR, and north 
bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum 
Bayou, AR; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of 
Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of 
Mississippi River navigation channel between miles 
320 and 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; 
specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, 
Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a demonstration 
* Authorizing legislation (Tables 41-D and 41-E) is listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are 
referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 
41-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control 
and drainage improvements in Red River backwater 
area including leveed portions east and west 
of Black River and south of Red River; Jonesville, 
LA, Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Bayou Macon Basins 
and tributaries, AR and LA, and Bayou Lafourche, 
LA; Yazoo River Basin, MS, including backwater 
area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, 
and Steele Bayou, MS; and Grand Prairie Region 
and Bayou Meto Basin, AR, including provision for 
agricultural water supply. 
Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees 
and river channel stabilization as required, from 
upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of 
Little River diversion channel, MO (1,003 miles 
AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau, MO, on 
right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel 
(967 miles AHP) above Cairo, IL, on left bank, 
including levees and revetment on right bank of 
Ohio River, in Mounds-Mound City area, IL; except 
operations above Cairo, IL, do not include channel 
stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance 
and improvement of Mississippi River navigation 
channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of 
Memphis Harbor, TN; specific fish and wildlife 
facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River 
backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, AR, and a 
pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees 
and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Arc, 
AR; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, 
AR; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries, 
AR; improvement works in St. Francis River 
Basin, MO and AR, including backwater area 
improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage 
District No. 17, AR; Little River diversion channel, 
MO, and L'Anguille River, AR; Wolf River Basin, 
TN; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, TN; Reelfoot 
Lake area, including channel improvement for 
Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, TN and KY; West 
Kentucky tributaries, KY; Mud Lake pumping station, 
TN; and pumping plants and outlet structures 
in the Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City area, IL. Channel 
improvements to Eight Mile Creek, Arkansas; Ten 
Mile and Fifteen Mile Bayous in West Memphis, and 
vicinity Arkansas; Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, 
Mississippi; and Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee 
and Mississippi. Navigation channel and harbor 
improvements to Helena Harbor and vicinity, 
Arkansas at Mississippi River, mile 652 AHP. Channel 
improvements and pumping station for Helena, 
Phillips County,and vicinity, Arkansas and St. 
Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, Missouri. 
Field operations of the commission restricted to 
levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control 
Act (local interests contributing one-third of costs 
and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within 
the following limits by two districts reporting 
directly to the Commission on matters within their 
jurisdiction-St. Louis (Sec. 6) levees from District: Mississippi River upper limits of Memphis District 
to Clemens Station, MO (1,254 miles AHP), on right 
bank, and Hamburg Bay, IL (1,215 miles AHP), on 
left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 
120 at Havana, IL. Rock Island District: Mississippi 
River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. 
Louis District to Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP). 
For work accomplished see Table 42-N, page 42-50, 
Annual Report for 1975. 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL 
VAILLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, 
MO
Location and description. The Mississippi 
River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and flows generally 
southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion 
of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 
115 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for 
barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, 
MN. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, 
the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, 
Yazoo, and Red-Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 
square miles in all or part of 31 states between the 
Rocky and Appalachian Mountains and part of two 
Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, MO, 53 
miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen 
abruptly into an alluvial valley of 35,460 square 
miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. 
A major part of the alluvial valley has been 
protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows 
within a floodplain having an average width of 
5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi 
River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi 
River Commission to Sep. 30, 1982, show 
approximate all-time maximum and minimum discharges 
between levees as follows: Cairo to White 
River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; 
thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet 
per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 
and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River 
and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in 
Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not 
confined between levees, maximum discharges 
recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, 
maximum of record below White River. High water 
and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early 
spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 
occurred as early as January. Low water stages 
generally prevail from August to December. 
Extreme all-time high in stages recorded at representative 
gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet 
at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 61 feet at Red River 
Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). 
The river is nontidal above Red River Landing 
where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 foot during 
extreme low water. 
Previous projects. For details see page 1944, 
Annual Report for 1932. 
Existing project. The Mississippi River and 
Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between 
Head of Passes, LA, and Cape Girardeau, MO, 
41-2

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
provides protection from floods by means of levees, 
floodwalls, floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. 
Francis Basins), bank stabilization, and channel 
improvements in and along the river and its tributaries 
and outlets insofar as affected by backwater 
of Mississippi River, including levee work on the 
main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock 
Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will 
be protected from the Mississippi River project 
flood. The project also provides for a 12- by 300- 
foot navigation channel between Baton Rouge, LA, 
and Cairo, IL; for salinity-control structures; and 
for channel realignment and improvement including 
bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood 
heights, control natural tendency of river to 
lengthen by meandering, and protect levees from 
being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of 
major main stem Mississippi River improvements 
are shown in Table 41-A and those for off-main 
stem tributaries are shown in Table 41-B. Pertinent 
data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 
41-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation 
are shown in Tables 41-D and 41-E. Summary of 
presently estimated Federal cost of authorized 
improvements is shown in Table 41-F. Construction 
of the existing project began in 1928 and has 
continued throughout ensuing years. Based on the 
estimated cost of $12,334,550,000 (cost projected 
through the construction period), and actual 
expenditures through Sep. 30, 1995, the entire 
project is about 85.3 percent complete. 
Recommended modifications. None. 
Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of 
1928, as amended, applies. Such requirements 
have, in general, been complied with by local 
interests. 
Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 21, 
1990, for Ports of Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, 
LA; Port Series No. 20, 1990, for Port of New 
Orleans, LA; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation 
Maps of Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the 
Gulf of Mexico (59th edition), 1992. 
Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, 
excluding maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 
1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30, 
1995, was $6,025,584,857. (See Table 41-V.) (See 
also Tables 41-U, 41-W, and 41-X for additional 
financial statements. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
The 346th Session was held Apr. 17-21, 1995, on 
board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI enroute on the 
Mississippi River from Cape Girardeau, MO, to New 
Orleans, LA. Bank protection works, levees and 
channel conditions were observed enroute. Public 
meetings were held at Cape Girardeau, MO, Memphis, 
TN; Vicksburg, MS, and New Orleans, LA, 
with approximately 220 people in attendance. This 
346th Session adjourned in New Orleans, LA at 
10:15 a.m. on Apr. 21, 1995. 
The 347th Session was held Aug. 28 - Sep 1, 1995, 
on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI enroute on 
the Mississippi River from Hickman, KY, to Morgan 
City, LA. Bank protection works, levees, and channel 
conditions were observed enroute. Public meetings 
were held at Hickman, KY; Memphis, TN; 
Rosedale, MS; and Krotz Springs, LA, with approximately 
390 people in attendance. The members of 
the Commission and senior staff were given briefings 
and tours of the Hickman Bluff, KY, project; 
Helena Harbor, AR, project area; the Greenville, 
MS, area (Main Canal, Black Bayou, etc.,); and local 
mat sinking operations. On Sep. 1, 1995, this Session 
was adjourned at 3:30 p.m. 
Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi 
River Commission are on file in the office of 
the President. 
Alluvial Valley Mapping 
General. Contoured quadrangles and general 
maps of the alluvial valley are available for departmental 
use and public distribution under prescribed 
regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication 
of quadrangle maps (scale 1:62,500) continued. 
Roadmap-type information brochures of principal 
portions of the overall project were published along 
with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and 
navigation. Maps and supplemental data sheets for 
active works were updated and published as 
required. 
The 1994, 60th edition of the folio of flood control 
and navigation maps (Scale 1:62,500) covering the 
Mississippi River and outlets was revised and 
printed in FY 1995. 
Approximately 4,707 flight-line miles of blackand-
white aerial photography (various scales); 939 
flight-line miles of color true photography; and about 
392 hours of oblique photography were flown along 
the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New 
Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. 
Work accomplished in the Districts: New 
Orleans District: The revision of 1:62,500 scale 
quadrangle maps Bayou Sale, LA; Derouen, LA; 
Rigolets, LA; St. Martinville, LA; Arnaudville, LA; 
Odenburg, LA; Oyster Bayou, LA; Chef Menteur, 
LA; Lost Lake, LA; Palmetto, LA; St. Francisville, 
LA; and Opelousus, LA, were completed in 1995. 
Memphis District--Series conversion of U.S. Geological 
Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500-scale quads 
of Hickman, KY; Millington, TN; Jericho, AR-TN; 
Deckerville, AR; Hunter, AR; Augusta, AR; Gregory, 
AR; Kensett, AR; Trimble, TN; Greenfield, TN; 
McKenzie, TN; Moscow, TN, are completed. 
Vicksburg District-Series Conversion of U.S. 
Geological Survey 1:24,000 - Scale Quadrangles to 
1:62,500 - Scale Quadrangles of Jamestown, LA; Le 
Compte, LA; and Boyce, LA, were published in FY 
1995. Alexandria, LA; Slidell, LA; Marksville, LA; 
41-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Colfax, LA; Montgomery, LA; and Provencal, LA, are 
in progress. 
Floods 
Streamflow observations during the fiscal year 
follow: 
Memphis District-Mississippi River crest stage 
of 55.7 feet at Cairo gage on May 28, 1995, and 
maximum discharge of 1,444,000 cubic feet per second 
occurred at Hickman, KY and crest stage of 39.1 
feet at Memphis on Jun. 2, 3, & 4, 1995, with maximum 
discharge of 1,532,000 cubic feet per second on 
Jun. 2-4, 1995. 
Vicksburg District-The Mississippi River in the 
Vicksburg District reached its highest levels in 12 
years during FY 95. Peak stages and discharges on 
the Vicksburg Districts reach of the Mississippi River 
were as follows: Arkansas City, 42.3 feet on Jun. 9, 
1995, and maximum discharge of 1,660,000 cubic feet 
per second; Vicksburg, 47.0 feet on Jun. 12, 1995, and 
maximum discharge of 1,595,000 cubic feet per second; 
and Natchez, 53.1 feet on Jun. 14, 1995, and maximum 
discharge of 1,505,000 cubic feet per second. 
New Orleans District-On the Mississippi River, 
the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum 
stage of 56.8 feet NGVD on Jun. 16, 1995, and the 
New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 
16.9 feet NGVD on Jun. 18, 1995. On the Atchafalaya 
River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum 
stage of 39 feet NGVD on Jun. 18, 1995. 
Studies and Investigations 
General investigations. Surveys and reports, 
authorized by laws and by Senate and House Public 
Works Committee resolutions, were made as 
required. Collection and study of basic data continued. 
The Energy and Water Development Appropriation 
Bill of 1990 directed the Corps to develop 
the most cost-effective flood control plan for the City 
of West Memphis without regard to frequency of 
flooding, drainage area, and the amount of runoff. It 
also directed the Secretary of the Army to incorporate 
existing flood control features of the Bayou 
Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant into 
the Lower Red River, South Bank Levees portion of 
the MR&T Project. The FY 1994 Energy and Water 
Development Appropriation Act (Public Law 103- 
126), dated Oct. 28, 1993, includes authority to 
within available funds, investigate conditions at 
Wax Lake Outlet Bayou Black and other features, 
and recommend modifications desirable for flood 
protection, navigation, and environmental management. 
It will take about four years to complete the 
study. This project includes an extensive public 
involvement program, with the objective to promote 
public awareness and participation. 
Engineering studies. A research program was 
continued for development of materials and more 
effective and economical design of regulation features 
for placing and stabilizing the Mississippi 
River in a suitable alignment. 
Potamology investigations of river behavior continue 
to be made. Investigations into the major 
cause-and-effect relationships attributable to major 
changes in stage-discharge relationships on the Mississippi 
River as a result of both natural and manmade 
modifications are continuing. 
Mississippi River and Tributaries - Levees 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
This feature consists of construction of new, and 
enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade 
and section; construction and restoration of levee 
berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of 
roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized 
in Table 41-N and further broken down as follows: 
New Orleans District-Enlarged 35.9 miles of levees 
in the Main Stem System. See Table 41-K. 
Vicksburg District-Completed construction of 1 
mile of berms in the Main Stem System. See Table 
41-L. 
Memphis District-Completed construction of 3.0 
miles of berms in the Main Stem System. See Table 
41-M. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 41-K, 41-L, 
41-M, and 41-N.) There are 1,609.8 miles of levees 
authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape 
Girardeau, of which 1,601.9 are in place with 1,306 
built to approved grade and section. The Main Stem 
Levee System consists of 2,203.6 miles, of which 
2,195.7 are in place with 1,811.3 miles completed to 
approved grade and section. Included in this system 
are 85.4 miles of levees and structures along the 
south bank of Arkansas River miles (all completed); 
59.2 along the south bank of Red River (all completed); 
and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River 
Basin, with 449.2 miles in place and 360.7 miles 
completed to grade and section (see Table 41-N). Of 
the authorized 686.3 miles of berms, 531.3 are complete. 
Graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been 
constructed on 2,093.7 miles of these levees. 
There are an additional 1,511.0 miles of authorized 
tributary levees in the MR&T Project, of which 
1,220.4 miles, are in place with 1,015.1 to approved 
grade and section. Berms have been completed on 
15.3 miles and 870.8 miles of graveled or hardsurfaced 
roads have been constructed on the levees. 
For summary of levee work Table 41-N. 
Mississippi River and Tributaries - Channel 
Improvements 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Dredging: Mississippi River Main Stem-(See Table 
41-G.) Work included dredging 15,321,600 cubic 
yards for maintenance of channel and harbor 
improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet 
was maintained. Dredging was done with the 
41-4

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
following plant: Vicksburg District, channel maintenance 
was performed by government-owned dredges 
Jadwin and Hurley. Memphis District channel 
maintenance dredging was performed by the 
Government-owned dustpan dredge Hurley. The 
MR&T Harbor maintained in New Orleans District 
was Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), cutterhead 
dredge E. Stroud. New Orleans district channel 
maintenance dredging was performed by 
government-owned dustpan dredge Jadwin and contract 
dustpan dredge Wallace McGeorge. 
The MR&T Harbor maintained in Memphis District 
was Memphis Harbor (McKellar Lake), by 
leased cutterhead dredge Natchez. MR&T Harbors 
maintained in Vicksburg District were Greenville 
Harbor and Vicksburg Harbor by cutterhead dredge 
Alabama. 
Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 41-H, 41-I, 
and 414-J.) Construction of 15.81 miles of new bank 
revetment and 243,611 squares of concrete mattress, 
for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was 
completed by Government plant and hired labor. 
Also, 16.07 miles of new dikes were constructed and 
required maintenance was performed. 
Approximately 3.8 miles of new bank revetment 
was constructed on the Atchafalaya River. 
Other work performed in the interest of navigation, 
supplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi 
River between Cairo, IL, and Baton Rouge, 
LA, included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions; 
issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District 
providing information on available high-water 
velocities at selected locations; maintenance of bulletin 
boards showing daily gage readings at regular 
MRC gages; and contact pilot service furnishing 
navigation interests with latest information and 
advice on channel conditions and navigation interests. 
Cost of this work is given in Table 41-U. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized 
channel improvement program between Baton 
Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 
1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel 
development and alignment improvements, decreased 
channel length between these cities by about 170 
miles. However, current velocities increased the attack 
on the banks and the river began to regain its length. 
As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 
was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. 
There are now in place 1,018.45 miles of operative 
bank revetment and 286.31 miles of dikes on the 
lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization 
should prevent the river from regaining 
much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation 
channel 9 by 300 feet is being accomplished 
by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging 
as required during the low- water season. Due to 
growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, 
average maintenance dredging requirements 
are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable 
depth is being obtained. Approximately 136.7 
miles of foreshore protection have been constructed 
along the lower Mississippi River. 
There are 73.6 miles of revetment and 5.7 miles of 
dikes on tributary channels as listed in Tables 41-H, 
41-I, and 41-J. 
New Orleans District 
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work by hired labor: Real estate activities and 
planning for construction were continued. 
Construction of levee enlargements and floodwalls 
continued on the east and west protection levees. 
There are two ongoing levee enlargement contracts, 
E-64, which will be completed early in the 
fiscal year, and W-91, which has been underway 
since July 1995. The W-91 contract will place 
230,000 cubic yards over a distance of 3.7 miles and 
is scheduled for completion during the fiscal year. 
There is one levee slide repair contract underway 
at Tiger Island with a placement of just over 10,000 
cubic yards. 
Maintenance by hired labor: Operation and maintenance 
of Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrel 
Locks, Morganza Control Structure, condition and 
operation studies, and water control management 
activities were continued. 
Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting 
in the removal of 2,500,000 cubic yards by two 
leased cutterhead dredges from Berwick Bay harbor 
at a total cost of $2,150,000. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated 
Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west 
protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, LA. 
The project is 91 percent complete. The current estimated 
Federal cost is $1,650,000,000 and non- 
Federal cost is $8,000,000. Of the 449.2 miles of 
levees and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya 
system, 360.7 miles are built to grade. See Table 
41-K for status of levees. 
Major items remaining to be completed include 
completion of levees to grade and section, channel 
training works below Morgan City, modification of 
existing structures and construction of two freshwater 
distribution structures. Approximately 45.9 
miles of bank stabilization have been placed as 
shown in Table 41-H. 
Flood Control 
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY 
SYSTEM, LA 
Location. The project lies in the lower part of 
the Atchafalaya Basin which is situated in southcentral 
Louisiana. It lies in parts of Iberville, Iberia, 
Pointe Coupee, St. Martin, St. Mary and St. Landry 
41-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Parishes. Further, it is limited to the part of the 
Atchafalaya River Basin that has been confined 
between protection or guide levees that are about 15 
miles apart. The northern boundary, west of the 
Atchafalaya River, lies along the south right-of-way 
line for the Union Pacific Railroad near the south 
side of U.S. Highway 190 between the West Atchafalaya 
Basin Protection Levee (WABPL) and the 
west limits of the Town of Krotz Springs, thence 
southerly along the west limits of the town and easterly 
along the south limits of the town to the Atchafalaya 
River; east of the Atchafalaya River it lies 
along the southern right-of-way line for the Union 
Pacific Railroad. The eastern and western boundaries 
lie at the floodside toes of the East Atchafalaya 
Basin Protection Levee (EABPL) and WABPL, 
respectively. The area within these limits has been 
calculated at about 595,000 acres. 
Existing Project. This project consists of the 
acquisition of 50,000 acres of fee title, excluding 
minerals, from willing sellers and 338,000 acres of 
easements including: (1) flowage easements; 
(2) flowage, developmental control and environmental 
protection easements; and (3) developmental 
control and environmental protection easements. 
All acquisition is over privately owned land. The 
state will provide its 150,000 acres of existing lands 
and also about 30,000 acres of land donated by the 
Dow Chemical Company to accomplish the project 
features. Other state and Federal lands in the project 
area include 15,000 acres acquired by the 
Department of Interior for the Atchafalaya National 
Wildlife Refuge and 12,000 acres acquired by the 
State for the Sherburne Wildlife Management Area. 
To date approximately 30,000 acres of fee and 
19,000 acres of easements have been acquired. 
Local Cooperation: A Project Cooperation 
Agreement (PCA) is not required for the acquisition 
of flowage, developmental control and environmental 
protection easements nor for acquisition of 
the public access lands (fee). A PCA will be required 
for the unscheduled work, such as the Operations 
and Maintenance and Recreation features. 
Operations and Results During Fiscal Year: 
A large ownership indicated a willingness to sell and 
approximately 16,000 acres of land in LA was 
acquired during the fiscal year. 
Condition as of Sep 30: 25,200 acres of easements 
are scheduled for acquisition over previously 
acquired land during FY 96. 
BATON ROUGE HARBOR (DEVILS 
SWAMP), LA 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the 
first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5.0 miles of channel 
was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 
1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. 
Maintenance dredging was performed in FY 1995, 
at a cost of $145,000. 
The remaining 2.5 miles were to be constructed 
when development of the initially constructed portion 
warrants expansion. Project expansion has not 
been necessary. Therefore this feature was 
deauthorized on Nov. 2, 1979, under the provisions 
of Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA 74), as 
amended. 
BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control 
management. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated 
in June 1946 and is 57 percent complete, based 
on the current estimated Federal cost of $20,400,000 
and non-Federal cost of $323,000. See page 2031, 
Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed 
work. 
Work required to complete the project consists of 
enlargement of 13.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, 
channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou 
Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from 
Washington, LA, to the west protection levee, and 
additional culverts through the west protection levee 
at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously 
authorized diversion channel from Washington to 
the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. 
With the termination of the Eastern Rapides and 
South Central Avoyelles project, it has become necessary 
to provide an adequate outlet structure solely 
for the Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries project. The 
economic effects of this change along with current 
benefits estimates have caused the benefit-cost ratio 
for the project to be less than unity. As a result, the 
project has now been classified as "inactive." If 
economic conditions change, the project could be 
reactivated. 
BONNET CARRE SPILLWAY, LA 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation 
studies, water control management, and 
ordinary maintenance of the control structure and 
spillway continued. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the 
spillway was initiated in FY 1929. The control 
structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed 
in 1932, and utility crossings were completed 
in 1936. The cost of the completed work is 
$14,212,200. 
It was necessary to operate the structure to 
reduce flood stages in 1937, 1945, 1950, 1973, 1975, 
1979, and 1983. The structure was operated in 1994 
to transfer fresh water from the Mississippi River to 
Lake Pontchartrain. 
A new office building was completed in FY 1990 
at a cost of $245,500. 
41-6

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
OLD RIVER, LA 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation 
and maintenance of the lock and control structures 
as required, condition and operation studies, water 
control management, maintenance of cleared areas, 
levee shaping, and engineering studies. A picket 
boat was previously used at the inflow channels to 
the low sill and auxiliary control structures. It was 
removed from operation in FY 1988. 
Maintenance by contract: Maintenance dredging 
was performed in FY 1994 at the Old River Lok 
Forebay where approximately 239,676 cubic yards 
were removed at a cost of $166,521. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began 
September 1955 and is complete at a Federal cost of 
$292,273,000. Principal items completed are as follows: 
Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, 
October 1959; auxiliary structure, September 
1986; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; 
inflow and outflow channels for the low-sill structure, 
February 1961; inflow and outflow channels for 
the auxiliary structure, August 1987; navigation 
lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation 
March 1963, at which time Old River was 
closed to navigation with a rock and earthfill dam; 
highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed 
March 1965. Approximately 9.4 miles of bank 
protection have been constructed at the inflow and 
outflow channels. (See Table 41-H for details of 
bank protection.) 
Vicksburg District 
LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, AR 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. 
A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank 
levees and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees 
have been completed to approved grade and section. 
These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bankprotection 
works constructed as a feature of project 
for Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK. For 
present status of this work, see report of Little Rock 
District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank protection is 
constructed with project maintenance funds. Little 
Bayou Meto gates and lifting mechanism were 
replaced during FY 88. 
LOWER RED RIVER - SOUTH BANK RED 
RIVER LEVEES, LA 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
New work by hired labor consisted of engineering 
studies. A Project Management Plan to address 
rehabilitation of the drainage structure and pumping 
plant was approved in Aug 94. A major maintenance 
report has been prepared and approved Sep. 
95 recommending replacement of the drainage 
structure. 
Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water 
control management and economic studies. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated 
in FY 92 and is complete. All of the 59.2 miles 
of levees authorized are completed to approved 
grade and section. 
TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA 
(a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou 
Macon, AR and LA. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Planning and design on project features are complete. 
The Lake Chicot Pumping Plant and related 
features are complete and in operation. No further 
work on the Tensas River Project (Separable Element) 
will be initiated due to lack of commitment 
from a local sponsor to cost share remaining E&D 
and construction. This project has been placed in 
the "inactive" category. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Channel improvement 
has been accomplished on 741.7 miles of project 
streams, providing major drainage outlets for the 
tributary areas. Additionally, 61.0 miles of the Tensas 
River has been cleared and snagged. The GDM 
for the Tensas River Project, above mile 61, including 
Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal is complete. However, 
no further work will be initiated due to lack of a 
local sponsor. 
(b) Red River backwater area. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Planning and design continued on project features. 
All channel work required to get flows to the Tensas 
Cocodrie Pumping Plant and gravity structure is 
complete. The gravity structure and the pumping 
plant are complete and are being operated and 
maintained by contract. One mitigation item, the 
construction of two water control weirs, was completed 
in May 1988. Contracts for three additional 
mitigation features are complete. Construction of 
the Durham Prong mitigation feature is complete. 
Tensas-Cocodrie, Item 4-A, levee enlargement, 6.3 
miles in length, was completed in September 1988, 
and Item 4-B, 2.4 miles of levee enlargement, was 
completed in October 1990. A contract for Item 2 
was awarded in January 1991 and is physically complete. 
These contracts will complete the levee 
enlargement for all of the levee system, except 0.8 
miles. 
Work on the Below Red River Phase II GDM has 
been reclassified as inactive. Design and construction 
of the Sicily Island Area Levee project is underway. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Levees in Tensas- 
Cocodrie area are complete except for levee raising 
of 0.8 miles. The work comprised 93.1 miles of new 
levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no 
levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on 
levees. Construction of 63.4 miles of levee, Larto 
Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. 
A levee grade reevaluation study for all levee systems 
in the Red River Backwater area was completed 
in Mar. 1985. Levee work on Sicily Island 
411 _'7

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
area consists of 56 miles of new levee, 2 pumping 
plants. 11 miles of channel work, and structural 
mitigation features. Levee items 1A, 1B, 5A-R, and 
5B are complete. Construction of Levee Item 4A is 
underway and the construction contract for Levee 
Item 4B was awarded in Sep. 95. 
YAZOO BASIN, MS 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
(a) Big Sunflower River, etc. The contract 
for construction of the Upper Steele Bayou Project, 
Main Canal, Item 1 was awarded Jun. 1995 and is 
scheduled to be completed in FY 96. Main Canal, 
Item 2 is scheduled to be awarded Apr. 1996 and 
Robert Shaw Ditch is scheduled for award Jan. 
1996. Black Bayou, Item 2 is scheduled for award 
Mar. 1996 and Black Bayou, Item 3 is scheduled 
for award in Aug. 1996, of the Steele Bayou, Swan 
Lake Project, Phase I and II channel and Levee 
construction were completed during FY 95 and 
Phase III is scheduled for award in Jan. 1996. 
(b) Flood Control Reservoirs 
(1) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 41-C.) The dam 
and appurtenant structures were maintained and 
operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake 
area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the 
lake was 227.3 feet NGVD on Aug. 11, 1995, and 
storage in flood control pool was 238,100 acre-feet. 
Peak 24-hour inflow was 26,000 cubic feet per second 
on Jan. 19, 1995. On Sep. 30, 1995, the pool 
elevation was 216.9 feet NGVD, and storage in the 
flood control pool was 87,400 acre-feet. 
(2) Enid Lake. (See Table 41-C.) The dam and 
appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. 
Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging 
and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area 
continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 
253.1 feet NGVD on July 10, 1995, when storage in 
the flood control pool was 323,100 acre-feet. Peak 
24-hour inflow was 18,200 cubic feet per second on 
Mar. 8, 1995. On Sep. 30, 1995, pool elevation was 
243.3 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control 
pool was 176,100 acre-feet. 
(3) Grenada Lake. (See Table 41-C.) Construction 
of remaining public-use facilities has been 
deferred pending development of cost-sharing agreements 
with local interests for construction and non- 
Federal operation and maintenance, consistent with 
projects for which recreation facilities are being constructed 
under the provisions of the Federal Water 
Project Recreational Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-72), 
as amended. Maximum pool elevation in the lake 
was 218.1 feet NGVD on May 2, 1995, when storage 
in the flood control pool was 667,700 acre-feet. Peak 
24-hour inflow was 59,450 cubic feet per second on 
Mar. 8, 1995. On Sep. 30, 1995, the pool elevation 
was 207.7 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control 
pool was 327,600 acre-feet. 
(4) Sardis Lake (See Table 41-C.) The dam and 
appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. 
Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area 
continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 
262.4 feet NGVD on Aug. 10, 1995, when storage in 
the flood control pool was 693,400 acre-feet. Peak 
24-hour inflow was 28,900 cubic feet per second on 
Mar. 8, 1995. On Sep. 30, 1995 the pool elevation 
was 252.1 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control 
pool was 386,300 acre-feet. A construction contract 
was awarded for the seismic remediation of 
Sardis Dam utilizing driven pre-stressed concrete 
piling as a result of an extensive study and evaluation 
of the expected performance of the dam during 
a major earthquake in the New Madrid earthquake 
zone of the central United States. 
(c) Greenwood, Yazoo City and Belzoni protection 
works. Contract forces continued operation 
and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and 
pumping plant. 
(d) Main stem. Remaining unconstructed features 
are subject to Yazoo Basin Reformulation 
Study. Contract forces continued operation and 
maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage 
facilities. 
(e) Mississippi Delta, MS. Feasibility studies 
limited solely to flood control problems in the Big 
Sunflower River Basin, are proceeding at full Federal 
cost. These investigations are scheduled for 
completion in FY 97. 
(f) Reformulation Study. The uncompleted 
portions of the Yazoo Basin construction program 
are being reformulated. This reformulation study 
includes investigations of the engineering, economic, 
and environmental aspects of the basin and 
is being accomplished in 4 phases. These studies 
will evaluate reasonable arrays of alternatives to 
the project features that remained after construction 
of items budgeted and scheduled for award in 
FY 90. The Upper Steele Bayou and Upper Yazoo 
Project reports were approved on May 25, 1993 
and Jun. 21, 1994, respectively. Concerning the 
final 2 phases, the Yazoo Backwater Reformulation 
Study began in FY 93 and the Tributaries 
Reformulation study began in FY 95. The Backwater 
Study is including various size pumping stations 
and a levee alternative. Studies currently 
scheduled for completion in FY 97. The Yazoo 
Tributaries Reformulation Study is evaluating 
flood control requirements on nine project features. 
Studies are currently scheduled for completion 
in FY 99. 
(g) Streambank erosion control. Construction 
of the following projects has been completed: Tillatoba 
and Hunter Creeks, Items 1 and 2; Hunter 
Creek, Item IA; South Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items 
5A and 5B; North Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items A and 
3A; Batupan Bogue, Items 4A, 4A-1, and 4A-2; Perry 
Creek, Items 6A and 6B; Johnson Creek, Items 9A, 
41-8

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
9B, and vegetative treatment, Item 12; Goodwin 
Creek, Items 8A, 8B, and 8C; and Hotopha Creek, 
Item 7. 
All construction under this feature is complete, 
and a final report was submitted to the Secretary 
of the Army Jan. 5, 1982. All work constructed 
has been turned over to the local sponsors for 
operation and maintenance except for the instrumented 
system on Goodwin Creek where the structures 
were retained for possible future studies. 
The Demonstration Erosion Control Project (DEC), 
a joint project with the USDA Soil Conservation 
Service was initiated by FY 85 appropriations as a 
continuation on streambank erosion control 
efforts. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate 
the applicability of a systems approach to 
the design of erosion, sedimentation, and flood 
control works by applying this approach to 15 
demonstration watersheds in the Yazoo Basin hill 
area. During FY 95, work continued in the DEC 
toward development of the systems plans and 
implementation of a monitoring program. Cumulative 
through FY 95, the District has completed 
the construction of 94 low drop grade control structures, 
509,191 linear feet of bank stabilization, 
113,734 linear feet of channel improvement, 14 
box culverts, 6 high drop grade control structures, 
590 riser pipe grade control structures, one floodwater 
retarding structure, and 2,774 feet of levees. 
(h) Tributaries. Construction: (1) 
(1) Bank Stabilization. Three bank stabilization 
items located on the Tallahatchie and 
Yalobusha Rivers were awarded in FY 94. The work 
was completed in FY 95. 
(2) Channels. Construction of the Alligator- 
Catfish, Round Lake Water Control Structure was 
completed Nov. 28, 1989. Construction on the 
remaining channel work on the Ascalmore-Tippo 
Project is complete. Contract forces continued 
operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and 
drainage facilities. 
(3) Levees. Levee work associated with the last 
item of work on Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. 
Levee work associated with Item 1 and Item 
1-A Pelucia Creek is complete. Three Pelucia Creek 
pumping stations are complete. Construction of 
Pelucia Creek, Item 2, Item 3, and Item 4 were completed 
in FY 94. Pelucia Creek relocations are 
scheduled for completion in FY 97. 
(i) Upper Yazoo Projects. The first eight items 
of channel improvement, approximately 56 miles, 
and four drainage structures have been completed. 
This work extends from Yazoo City, Mississippi, to 
about 15 miles upstream of Belzoni, Mississippi. 
The Fort Pemberton Flood Control Structure was 
completed on Apr. 29, 1991. 
Item 3A-2 levee was completed in FY 94. Item 
3A-1 channel was awarded in FY 94 and is scheduled 
for completion in FY 96. Item 3A-2 channel 
work was awarded in FY 95. This item will contain 
the first thin layer disposal site. 
Roebuck Lake and Fort Loring water control 
structures and Tchula Lake weirs were completed in 
FY 95. 
Design efforts for Channel Items 3B, 4, and 5 are 
underway. 
The Alligator-Catfish water control structure was 
awarded Jul. 31, 1995. 
The Belzoni Bridge (known as the Brooklyn 
Bridge) is an old steel turn span which served as a 
river crossing at Belzoni, MS, until the 1970's. In 
July 1993, the bridge collapsed and fell into the 
Yazoo River. The Corps determined the collapsed 
bridge was adversely affecting flood control. A 
report to the Senate was prepared in March 1994 
requesting approval to remove the bridge. Approval 
and funds for bridge removal were received in October 
1994, contingent upon Humphreys County and 
the City of Belzoni, MS, officially abandoning the 
bridge. A contract for the work is expected to be 
awarded in Nov. 1995 and completed by mid FY 96. 
(j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo area 
backwater levees are complete, including the backwater 
levee from the Mississippi River levee to the 
west levee of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little 
Sunflower River drainage structure, and the connecting 
channel from the Steele Bayou drainage 
structure to the Big Sunflower River. 
The Satartia area backwater levee is complete. 
Rocky Bayou area levee Items IA and 1B have been 
completed. Completed backwater levees will require 
raising to provide the degree of protection intended 
based on the project design flow line developed for 
the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. 
Four Greentree Reservoirs and pumping stations 
have been constructed to mitigate for the waterfowl 
impacts of the project. 
Mitigation of the terrestrial impacts is now underway. 
Approximately 8,800 acres of cleared, frequently 
flooded, agricultural lands have been 
obtained in the Yazoo Backwater area of Mississippi 
to mitigate the wildlife losses resulting from construction 
and operation of the Yazoo Area and 
Satartia Area levees projects. This land is now 
being reforested and will be managed for terrestrial 
wildlife. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature of 
Yazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the 
total project is about 65 percent complete. 
Memphis District 
CACHE BASIN, AR 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
No contracts were awarded or completed during 
the fiscal year. 
41-9

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated 
during 1972 and is 4 percent complete. Construction 
of the authorized project was stopped in 1978 due to 
environmental opposition. Reevaluation studies of 
the authorized plan were initiated in June 1987 to 
provide a more environmentally balanced plan. The 
reevaluation effort was ter tt id on Dec. 15, 1994, 
due to a lack of local sponsor lip. The Memphis District 
has initiated action to turn the acquired mitigation 
lands (7,959 acres) over to the U.S. Department 
of Interior. 
CONSTRUCTION GENERAL 
Fulton, KY, Lake 9 Outlet Structure, Gate 6 
Hoise, awarded De. 13, 1993, 0 percent complete. 
Helena, AR, concrete mattress at Helena, awarded 
Jan. 21, 1994, completed Oct. 5, 1994. 
HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Remaining work consists of tree growth on Item 1. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction 
was initiated during 1989 and Item 3-2, awarded 
Sep. 10 1902, is 98 percent complete. 
HORN LAKE CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES 
INCLUDING COW PEN CREEK, TENNESSEE 
AND MISSISSIPPI 
Location. Horn Lake Creek is located in north- 
- est ' soto County, MS and southwest Shelby 
Cour t,TN. 
Existing project. The project was approved for 
construction on Nov. 17, 1986, under authority of 
Title IV, Section 401 of the 1986 Water Resources 
Development Act. The project consists of 3.5 miles of 
drift removal and 2.75 miles of channel clearing on 
Horn Lake Creek; 2.1 miles of channel clearing on 
Rocky Creek and 0.62 miles of channel clearing and 
1.85 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen 
Creek. The project will provide 1.1-year flood frequency 
protection on Horn Lake and Rocky Creeks 
and 25-year flood frequency protection on Cow Pen 
Creek. The estimated construction cost for the project 
is $4,800,000. The initial contract for project 
construction was awarded in Apr. 1993. Project completion 
is expected in 1996. 
Local Cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 
was executed with the Horn Lake Creek 
Watershed Drainage District on Feb. 26, 1992. The 
sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, 
rights-of-way and relocations required for project 
construction and a cash contribution. Total non- 
Federal cost share will be between 25 and 50 percent 
of total project cost. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. The contract for work 
on Rocky Creeks was awarded in September 1994 
and completed in Feb. 1995. Cow Pen Creek will be 
awarded once the Horn Lake Drainage District completes 
acquisition of rights-of-way. 
LOWER WHITE RIVER 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
(a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were 
no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal 
year. 
(b) Clarendon Levee. Contract awarded on 
Aug. 31, 1995, to provide a gravel surface on 6.0 
miles of levee at Clarendon. Gravel was not originally 
provided on the levee crown. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. 
(a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was 
initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. 
(b) Clarendon Levee. Approximately 1.0 mile 
of the 6.0 mile gravel surfacing job has been completed. 
Scheduled construction completion is Dec. 
1995. 
NONCONNAH CREEK, MS AND TN 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
U.S. Hwy 51 Bridge relocation (by local sponsor) 15 
percent complete. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction 
was initiated during 1990 and is 45 percent 
complete. 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
In addition minor maintenance on levees is performed 
as required by the local interests and major 
maintenance is performed as required for slide 
repairs, road rehabilitation, and other similar work 
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Huffman, AR, 
Berm was awarded Sep. 24, 1993, and is 95 percent 
complete. 
Ridgely, TN Berm was awarded Apr. 28, 1994, 
and is complete. Slope stability work was awarded 
at Walls, MS, Jun. 27, 1994, and is completed as of 
Aug. 3, 1995. Flower Lake, MS, Aug. 19, 1994, 33 
percent complete. Dogtooth Bend Culvert 
Gate/Hoist, awarded Dec. 1, 1993, completed Dec. 
17, 1994. Levee Slope Stab., St. Johns-New Madrid, 
awarded Jul. 28, 1994, completed Sep. 23, 1995. 
Below Commerce, Levee Resurfacing, awarded Aug. 
23, 1994, completed Dec. 1, 1995. Long Lake Culvert 
Repair, awarded Sep. 24, 1993, 8 percent complete. 
Mud Lake Floodgate awarded Jun. 30, 1992, completed 
Nov. 10, 1994. Culvert Replacement Blue 
Bayou, awarded Sep. 30, 1992, completed Nov. 10, 
1994. Repair Cache River Culvert awarded Sep. 22, 
1993, 10 percent complete. Below Whitehall Resurfacing, 
awarded Aug. 31, 1994, completed Nov. 30, 
1994. Wilson Levee Resurfacing, awarded Aug. 31, 
1994, completed Jan 10, 1995. R-48.31 Nash Levee 
Slope Stabilization, awarded Sep. 25, 1995, 0 percent 
complete. West Memphis Berm awarded May 
28, 1991, completed Sep. 1995. Mooring Bayou 
Floodgate L-869 awarded Jul. 28, 1995, 0 percent 
41-10

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
complete. Culvert Replace - Below Commerce 
awarded May 25, 1995, 0 percent complete. Cairo 
Levee Roadway Resurfacing awarded Nov. 22, 1994, 
completed May 11, 1995. 
REELFOOT LAKE - LAKE NO.9, TN AND KY 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
No contracts awarded or completed during this fiscal 
year. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated 
during 1974 and is 89 percent complete. 
ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR AND MO 
(a) Little River Drainage. 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
Sals Creek bridge, awarded Nov. 22, 1994, completed 
Aug. 12, 1995. Sals Creek Channel Enlargement 
awarded Apr. 28, 1995,95 percent complete. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated 
during 1938 and is 95 percent complete. 
(b) St. Francis River and Tributaries. 
Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. 
Lower St. Francis River. Blackdale Mangrum 
Gravel awarded Sep. 29, 1993, completed May 31, 
1994. Mark Tree, AR Siphon Rehabilitation awarded 
Sep. 27, 1993, completed Sep. 1, 1995. Below Rivervale 
Levee Restoration awarded Sep. 27, 1993, completed 
Oct. 31, 1994. Ditch 7, bridge, mile 6.05, 
awarded May 21, 1992, completed Nov. 17, 1994. 
Hwy 63 - Hwy 62 Levee Resurfacing, awarded Aug. 
31, 1994, completed Dec. 19, 1994. Ditch 1, AR Item 
3 Channel Enlargement awarded Sep. 29, 1995, 0 
percent complete. Ditch 9 and 10 Channel Clearing 
and Cleanout awarded Sep. 1995, 0 percent complete. 
Ditch 81 Control Structure Scour Repair 
awarded Aug. 16, 1995,0 percent complete. Ditch 13 
Channel Clearing/Excavation awarded Aug. 28, 
1995, 0 percent complete. Madison Marianna Levee 
Resurfacing awarded Jul. 28, 1995, 0 percent complete. 
Ditch 1, Item 4, bridge, mile 28.80 awarded 
Oct. 31, 1995, 99 percent complete. Ditch 1, Item 4, 
County Bridge, Mile 35 awarded Jun. 30, 1995, 30 
percent complete. Ditch 1, Item 4, County Bridge, 
Mile 31.54 awarded May 25, 1995, 60 percent complete. 
Ditch 13 County Bridge, Miles .02, 5.00 and 
5.90 awarded Apr. 28, 1995, 60 percent complete. 
Ditch 13, channel clearing, awarded Aug. 28, 1995, 1 
percent complete. Honey Cypress Channel Cleanout 
awarded Mar. 8, 1995, completed Sep. 26, 1995. 
Huxtable Concrete Joint Repair awarded Dec. 19, 
1994, 79 percent complete. DD17 Personnel Facility 
awarded May 31, 1995, 0 percent complete. 
(c) Upper St. Francis River. 
Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. 
New Franklin, bridge, mile 6.00, awarded Jul. 30, 
1992, 85 percent complete. New Franklin, bridge, 
mile 9.60, awarded Jul. 30, 1992, 60 percent complete. 
Main and Ditch 2, Item 1, Mile 12.13 and 
14.65, awarded Apr. 28, 1994, completed Apr. 15, 
1995. Ditch 24 Channel Clearing, awarded Jul. 12, 
1994, completed Jan. 19, 1995. Ditch 12 Channel 
Clearing, awarded Jul. 15, 1994, completed Feb. 8, 
1995. Dudley Ditch-Lick Creek, Channel clearing, 
awarded Jul. 29, 1994, completed Aug. 30, 1995. N. 
Franklin Ditch, Lat 2 Channel Enlargement, 
awarded Aug. 10, 1994, completed Sep. 15, 1995. 
Main and Ditch 2, Item 1, bridge, mile 12.07, 
awarded Sep. 19, 1995, 0 percent complete. Main 
and Ditch 2, Item 1, bridge, mile 13.65, awarded 
Apr. 28, 1995,99 percent complete. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Project initiated 1937. 
project is 88 percent complete. 
WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
No contract awarded or completed during fiscal 
year. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated 
during 1978 and is 4 percent complete. Project is 
currently inactive due to lack of local support. 
WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TN 
Operations and results during fiscal year. 
(a) Forked Deer River and principal tributaries, 
TN. Forked Deer River channel improvement 
is 13 percent complete. 
(b) Item 3A, Bridge Protection. Awarded Aug. 
24, 1995, and is 95 percent complete. 
(c) Obion River and principal tributaries, 
TN. Obion Rivers channel improvement is 66 percent 
complete. 
(d) Rutherford Fork Obion River, TN. Bridge 
Protection Mile 15.2 awarded Aug. 25, 1995, 0 percent 
complete. 
Condition as of Sep. 30. West Tennessee Tributaries 
Project is 45 percent complete. 
WHITEMAN'S CREEK, ARKANSAS 
Location. The project is located in the city of 
Jonesboro, AR. 
Existing project. The project was authorized for 
construction by the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992, on Oct. 31, 1992. The project consists of 
6.1 miles of channel improvements on Whiteman's, 
Turtle, Moore's and Higginbottom Creeks. The proposed 
improvements will provide 10-year level of 
flood protection along Whiteman's, Turtle and 
Moores and 25-year protection on Higginbottom. 
Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation 
Agreement (PCA) is expected to be executed in early 
FY 1996. 
Conditions as of Sep. 30. The City of Jonesboro, 
AR, the project sponsor, continues to work to 
meet PCA requirements (i.e., lands, relocations, 
etc.). 
41-11

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS 
Mileage 
Above Head 
of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 
0-9571 
10-81 
11-25 
38 
45 
118 
81 
Head of Passes, LA-Cairo, IL 
The Jump-New Orleans, LA 
Baptiste Collette-Bayou 
Ostrica, LA 
Homeplace, LA 
Bohemia, LA 
Davis Pond, LA (formerly 
Myrtle Grove, LA) 
Caernarvon, LA 
Bohemia, LA-New Orleans, 
LA 
New Orleans, LA 
New Orleans, LA 
New Orleans-Morganza, LA 
New Orleans-Baton Rouge, 
LA 
Bonnet Carre' Floodway, LA 
Mississippi-Louisiana 
Estuarine Areas, LA/MS 
(Bonnet Carre') 
Bonnet Carre'-Baton Rouge, 
LA 
Baton Rouge Harbor 
Morganza Floodway, LA 
Morganza-Old River, LA 
Dredging, revetment, and contract 
work 
Main line levee, right bank 
Local levees, left bank 
Salinity control structure, right 
bank 
Salinity control structure, left 
bank 
Salinity control structure, right 
bank 
Salinity control structure, left 
bank 
Main line levee and floodwall, 
left bank 
Main line levee, right bank 
Main line levee and floodwall, 
left bank 
Main line levee, right bank 
Main line levee, left bank 
Regulating spillway, left bank 
Salinity control structure, 
left bank 
Main line levee, left bank 
Devils Swamp barge channel 
Regulating spillway, right bank 
Main line levee, right bank 
41-12 
Authorized by Public 
Law 89-298 
(HD 308/74/1). 
Included in MS 
Delta Region, LA 
feature. Pending 
deauthorization. 
Authorized by Public 
Law 89-298 
(HD 308/74/1). 
Included in MS 
Delta Region, LA 
feature. Pending 
deauthorization. 
Authorized by Public 
Law 89-298 
(HD 308/74/1). 
Included in MS 
Delta Region, LA 
feature. Postauthorization 
change 
report, approved 
June 1987. 
Authorized by Public 
Law 89-298 
(HD 308/74/1). 
Included in MS 
Delta Region, LA 
feature. 
Authorized by Public 
Law 81-516. 
Authorized by Public 
Law 81-516. 
-- 
Authorized by Public 
Public Law 100-676 
Modified by Public 
Law 87-874. 
-- 
Extends up south 
bank of Old River 
to Barbre Landing. 
81-96 
91-104 
96-279 
104-234 
127-129 
129 
129-234 
235 
279-287 
287-303

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
TABLE 41-A 
(Continued) 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS 
Mileage 
Above Head 
of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 
303-314 
314-572 
437 
437-721 
490 
537 
646 
605-666 
672-993 
722-725 
721-734 
803-873 
857 
890 
890 
890-954 
902-922 
922 
946 
9571 
Old River, LA control 
Old River-Cypress Creek, AR 
Vicksburg Harbor, MS 
Vicksburg-Lake View, MS 
Wilson Point, LA 
Greenville Harbor, MS 
Long Lake, Helena, AR 
Henrico-Helena, AR 
St. Francis River-Commerce, 
MO3 
Industrial levee (Ensley 
Bottoms) 
Memphis Harbor, TN 
Tiptonville-Obion River 
Near Mud Lake, TN 
St. Johns Bayou, MO 
New Madrid Floodway, MO 
New Madrid-Birds Point, 
MO 
Slough Bend, Hickman, KY 
Hickman, KY 
Peafield, MO 
Cairo, Cairo drainage 
district 
Authorized by Public 
Law 83-780. 
Joins Arkansas 
River, south bank 
levee. 
Authorized by Public 
Law 70-391. Modified 
by Public 
Laws 79-526 and 
83-780. 
Unpublished 
Vicksburg District's 
MRC report approved 
Apr. 14, 
1966.2 
Authorized by Public 
Law 85-500. 
Authorized by Public 
Law 79-526.2 
Levee closure and enlargement, 
low and high water spillway 
structures, navigation lock, and 
Sapproach channels, right bank 
Main line levee, right bank 
Harbor extension and industrial 
fill 
Main line levee, left bank 
Pumping Plant and drainage 
structure, right bank 
Harbor improvements and port 
area 
Culvert and floodgate, right 
bank 
Main line levee and floodwall, 
right bank 
Main line levee, right bank 
Levee and pumping station 
Closure of Tennessee Chute, 
industrial fill, levee, harbor 
channels, etc. 
Main line levee, left bank, levee 
extension, and diversion Obion 
River 
Pumping station and adjacent 
channel improvements 
Drainage floodgate and levee 
closure 
Drainage floodgate and levee 
closure 
Floodway, right bank 
Main line levee, left bank 
Floodwall, left bank 
Drainage floodgate 
Floodwalls and levees 
41-13 
Authorized by Public 
Law 79-526. 
Modified by Acts of 
Jul. 24, 1946 and 
Dec. 23, 1971. 
Authorized Dec. 15 
and 17, 1970 under 
Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 
1965 FC Act. 
Modified by Jul. 24, 
1946 Act. 
Modified by Sep. 3, 
1954 Act. 
Authorized by 
Sep. 3, 1954 Act.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-A 
(Continued) 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS 
Mileage 
Above Head 
of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 
9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage Floodwalls, levees, and pumping-- 
district, Mounds, Mound plant 
City, and vicinity 
Thebes-Rock Island, IL Levees, both banks Intermittent (Sec. 6). 
Cape Girardeau, MO, to Rock Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). 
Island, IL 
1. Cairo, IL, is on Ohio River about 3 miles above its mouth (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). 
2. Also see Table 41-D, "Authorising Legislation." 
3. Commerce, MO, is on Upper Mississippi River, 39 miles above mouth of Ohio River. 
41-14

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND 
OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS 
Mileage 
Below Head of 
Atchafalaya 
River Locality Improvement Remarks 
0-54 
27-54 
54-117 
20-27 
25-117 
27 
0-27 
31-57 
80 
53-117 
117 
117-129 
117-129 
105 
105-120 
115 
116 
5 
5-105 
29 
Floodway 
Floodway 
Floodway 
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA1 
Atchafalaya Basin, Morganza 
and West Atchafalaya 
Floodways 
West Atchafalaya Floodway 
between Red River and 
Alabama Bayou 
Morganza Floodway between 
Mississippi River and 
Alabama Bayou 
Atchafalaya Basin Floodway 
between Alabama Bayou and 
Morgan City 
East protection levee 
(Morganza and Atchafalaya 
Floodways) 
Lacour-Red Cross 
Morganza-Morgan City 
Bayou Latenache 
Upper Pointe Coupee Loop 
area 
Bayou Fordoche-Ramah 
Bayou Sorrel1 
Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan 
City 
Morgan City 
Below Morgan City 
Below Morgan City 
Atchafalaya Basin Floodway 
lower protection levee 
Calumet 
Below Morgan City 
Berwick1 
Patterson 
West protection levee 
(Atchafalaya Basin and West 
Atchafalaya Floodways) 
Simmesport-Hamburg 
Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet 
Coulee des Grues 
West Atchafalaya Floodway 
Including lower Morganza Floodway 
guide levee. 
Through upper Morganza guide 
levee and enlargement of outlet 
channel. 
Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. 
Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See 
Table 41-D. 
Levee landside borrow pit. 
Alternate route, Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway, Port Allen to Morgan 
City. 
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes 
levee west side borrow pit 
channel. 
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. 
Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway. 
East of lower river. 
Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. 
Inclosed area between Wax Lake 
Lake Outlet and Berwick. 
Lower Atchafalaya River. 
Adjustment to provide fresh water. 
West Atchafalaya Floodway. 
41-15 
Levee, upper Morganza guide 
Levee and Morgan City floodwall 
Drainage structure, Pointe 
Coupee, and channel 
enlargement 
Additional drainage facilities 
Drainage channel 
Lock 
Alternate navigation channel. 
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 
Lock in Bayou Boeuf1 
Channel relocation 
Levee, floodwall 
Floodgate, east 
Levees, floodwall, drainage 
structures, and pumping plants 
Lock 
Water system 
Levee fuse plug 
Protection levee 
Levee enlargement and floodgate 
extension 
Railway

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-B 
(Continued) 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND 
OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS 
Mileage 
Below Head of 
Atchafalaya 
River Locality Improvement Remarks 
29 
40 
40 
40 
41 
41 
41 
94 
94 
105 
105 
0-54 
5-6 
5-66 
28.30 
40-41 
54-117 
94-106 
Mileage 
Above 
Mouth 
0-8 
50-133 
96 
133 
Railway 
Gated drainage structures 
Highway 
Highway 
Gated drainage control 
structures and channels 
Railway 
Railway 
Floodgate and approach 
channels 
Outlet, Charenton drainage 
canal and protection levee 
Floodgate, west 
Drainage canal-railway and 
highway bridges 
Through West Atchafalaya 
protection levee. 
--
-- 
-- 
Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake 
through West Atchafalaya 
protection levee. 
Restoration of drainage west of 
West Atchafalaya Basin protection 
levee. 
Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. 
To lower flood heights. 
Morganza Floodway 
Bayou Darbonne 
West Atchafalaya Floodway 
Morganza Floodway 
Bayou Courtableau 
West Atchafalaya Floodway 
Morganza Floodway 
Charenton 
Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe 
Calumet 
Wax Lake Outlet 
Atchafalaya River 
Barbre Landing-Alabama 
Bayou 
Simmesport 
Simmesport-Bayou Garofier 
Melville 
Krotz Springs 
Below Alabama Bayou 
Mississippi River-Morgan City 
TECHE-VERMILION 
BASINS, LA 
Atchafalaya River to Teche- 
Vermilion Basins 
Courtableau Basin, LA, and 
outlets 
Charenton Canal 
West Atchafalaya protection 
levee borrow pit channel 
Bayou Courtableau spillway 
Bayou des Glaises 
BAYOU COCODRIE AND 
TRIBUTARIES 
Bayou Courtableau 
Bayou Cocodrie 
Levee, ring, and drainage 
structure 
West bank, levee 
Levee, ring 
Levee, ring 
Channel enlargement 
12- by 125-foot navigation 
channel 
Pumping station above Krotz 
Springs, conveyance channels, 
and appurtenant works 
Drainage channel 
Drainage channel 
Drainage control structure 
Diversion channel 
Enlargement and additional 
culverts 
Enlargement and realinement 
Increase channel capacities to 
decrease flood heights. 
Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. 
Freshwater distribution from 
Atchafalaya River to Teche- 
Vermilion Basins. 
Outlet to gulf 
Intercepting drainage channel. 
Washington to west protection 
levee. 
41-16 
East bank, levee 
0-17

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
TABLE 41-B 
(Continued) 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND 
OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS 
Mileage 
above 
mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 
17-40 
40-51 
51-60 
17-42 
87-107 
40 
60 
87 
Bayous Cocodrie-Boeuf 
diversion 
Bayou Boeuf 
Bayous Boeuf-Rapides 
diversion 
Upper Cocodrie 
Bayou Boeuf 
Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid 
Structures 
Lecompte Control Structure 
Bayou Rapides Control 
Structure 
Bayou Lamourie Control 
Structure 
Various 
LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA 
Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson 
Parish, LA 
AMITE RIVER, LA 
Amite River, LA 
LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH 
BANK, RED RIVER 
LEVEES, LA 
Moncla-Hotwells 
Bayou Rapides Pumping 
plant and gravity 
structure 
Red River-Moncla to Lake 
Long 
EASTERN RAPIDES AND 
SOUTH-CENTRAL 
AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA 
Eastern Rapides and southcentral 
Avoyelles Parishes, 
LA 
TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA 
Red River backwater area 
Tensas-Cocodrie area 
Larto Lake-Jonesville 
Levees, drainage channels, 
structures, and pumping plant 
Levees, drainage channels, and 
structures 
New channel 
New channel 
New channel 
Enlargement, clearing, and 
snagging 
Enlargement, realinement, 
clearing, and snagging 
Fixed elevation weir 
Gated drainage structure 
Gated drainage structure 
Railway, highway, and local road 
bridges, and pipeline crossing 
Flood protection 
Bank protection 
Levee, south bank 
Levee, south bank 
Levees 
Flood protection and drainage 
improvement 
Authorized by Public Law 81-516. 
Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. 
Senate Doc. (Public Law 84-99) 
Added to project by 
Public Law 101-514. 
Intermittent (Sec. 6). 
Authorized by Public Law 91-611. 
(4) 
(4) 
41-17 
(2,3) 
82-145 
3-56

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-B 
(Continued) 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND 
OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS 
Mileage 
above 
mouth I cality Improvement Remarks 
Sicily Island area 
3-56 
5 
56 
0-32 
0-56 
151-235 
21..286 
2L 296 
0-75 
0-8 
0-7 
0-33 
0-10 
0-9 
0-14 
0-170 
0-34 
0-35 
Lake Chicot 
0-6 
0-165 
0-22 
0-0.2 
Below Red River area 
Black River, LA 
Six Mile Bayou area 
Jonesville, LA 
Ouachita River 
Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and 
Bayou Macon, AR and LA 
Boeuf River, AR and LA 
Below Bayou La Fourche 
Bayou La Fourche 
Boeuf River, AR and LA 
above Bayou La Fourche 
Canal 19 
Canal 19 extension 
Big and Colewa Creeks 
Tributaries of Boeuf River-- 
Canal 19 
Fleschmans Bayou 
Caney Bayou 
Big Bayou 
Canal 18 
Kirsch Lake Canal 
Black Pond Slough 
Bayou Macon, AR and LA 
Bayou Macon 
Canal 43 
Canal 81 
Pumping plant and drainage 
structure 
Tributary of Bayou Macon 
Rush Bayou 
Tensas River, AR and LA 
Tensas River 
Tributary of Tensas River 
Mill and Vidal Bayous 
Grant's Canal, LA 
Grant's Canal at Lake 
Providence 
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, 
AR 
Yancopin-Pine Bluff 
Levees, drainage channels, 
structures, and pumping plants 
Levees, drainage channels, 
structures, and pumping plants 
Drainage structure and 
appurtenant channel works 
Levees, floodwall, pumping 
plant, and interior drainage 
Levees, drainage channels, and 
structures 
Clearing 
Channel improvement and 
realinement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
To divert flows from Lake Chicot 
Clearing 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Filling canal 
Levee, south bank 
41-18 
(4) 
(4) 
Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter 
Report dated May 31, 1977, 
MR&T authority.2 
Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. 
Incorporated in MR&T by Public 
Law 81-516.2 
Monroe to Sandy Bayou and 
Bawcomville (Sec. 6). 
(5) 
(5) 
Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 
and 79-526.2,3 
(5) 
(6) 
Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 
(6) 
(6) 
(5) 
(6) 
(6) 
(6) 
See Table 41-E 
(5) 
(5) 
Authorized by Public Law 90-483. 
(6) 
Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 
Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 
Authorized by Public Law 81-516. 
23-98

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
TABLE 41-B 
(Continued) 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND 
OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS 
Mileage 
above 
mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 
35-98 
48-102 
0-75 
0-381 
75-366 
75-345 
45-109 
75 
127 
185 
381 
0-64 
64 
0-24 
0-26 
26 
0-13 
13 
0-88 
137-260 
75-381 
0-8.3 
0-23 
0-42 
Revetment 
Levee, north bank 
Water supply and drainage 
improvements 
Levees and pumping plants 
Channel improvement 
Levees, right bank 
Levees, left bank 
(5) 
Authorized by Public Law 81-516. 
-- 
Including Tallahatchie and 
Coldwater Rivers. 
Intermittent. 
Intermittent. 
Fletcher Bend, AR, to 
Pine Bluff 
North Little Rock to Gillett 
(below Plum Bayou) 
GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU 
METO, AR 
Grand Prairie Region and 
Bayou Meto Basin, AR 
YAZOO BASIN, MS 
Yazoo Backwater area 
Yazoo River System below 
Arkabutla Lake 
Yazoo River between Yazoo 
City and Prichard 
Yazoo River between Yazoo 
City and Askew 
Will M. Whittington Auxiliary 
Channel 
Yazoo City protection 
Rocky Bayou area 
Belzoni protection 
Greenwood protection 
Arkabutla Lake 
Yalobusha River below 
Grenada Lake 
Grenada Lake 
Tallahatchie River-Little 
Tallahatchie River 
Little Tallahatchie River 
below Sardis Lake 
Sardis Lake 
Yocono River below Enid Lake 
Enid Lake 
Cassidy Bayou below Old 
Coldwater River 
Upper Yazoo Projects 
Area between main stem and 
hills including Bobo Bayou 
McKinney Bayou 
Alligator-Catfish Bayous 
Bear Creek 
Whiteoak Bayou 
Levee, drainage structure, and 
pumping plant 
Channel clearing and 
enlargement 
Levee and floodwall 
Levees, channel improvement, 
drainage structures, and 
pumping plants 
Flood detention and conservation 
Channel improvement 
Flood detention and conservation 
Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway 
Improvement of 7.8 miles was 
approved Apr. 29, 1970. 
-- 
See Table 41-C. 
See Table 41-C. 
Channel improvement 
Flood detention and conservation 
Channel improvement 
Flood detention and conservation 
Channel improvement 
Floodway channel 
Levees and channel improvement 
Channel improvement and 
enlargement of pumping plant. 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
See Table 41-C. 
See Table 41-C. 
Including Moores Bayou, Cutoff 
Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. 
Authorized by Public Law 79-526. 
Authorized by Public Law 79-526. 
Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 
As modified in GDM in 1967. 
Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 
Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 
41-19 
Floodway channel

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-B 
(Continued) 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND 
OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS 
Mileage 
above 
mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 
275-290 
0-204 
0-8 
0-28 
0-81 
0-43 
0-4 
0-27 
153-160 
0-68 
13-55 
0-68 
99 
108-192 
122 
143 
0-196 
0-90 
Tallahatchie River, MS 
Big Sunflower River, etc. 
Big Sunflower River 
Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal 
Hushpuckena River 
Quiver River 
Gin and Muddy Bayous, MS 
Bogue Phalia 
Ditchlow Bayou 
Little Sunflower River 
Deer Creek 
Steele Bayou 
Muddy Bayou 
LOWER WHITE RIVER AND 
BASIN, AR 
Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake 
Big Creek and tributaries 
Clarendon levee 
Augusta to Clarendon 
De Valls Bluff 
Des Arc, AR 
CACHE BASIN, AR 
Cache River, AR 
Bayou DeView, AR 
ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND 
BASIN, AR AND MO 
Inter-River Drainage District 
in Missouri 
Mouth of St. Francis River- 
Wappapello Dam 
Wappapello Lake 
Little River Basin 
Marked Tree, AR 
Tyronza River 
Big Slough Ditch 
Two road crossings of Panola- 
Quitman Floodway, MS, and for 
protection of Sheley Bridge 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Water-control structure 
Levee, backwater including 
outlet 
Pumping plant 
Channel improvement and 
structures 
Levee and outlet structures 
Levees, outlet structures 
Levee, outlet structure, and 
pumping station 
Levee, outlet structure, and 
pumping station 
Channel improvement and 
structures 
Channel improvement and 
structures 
Channel improvement and two 
outlet structures 
Floodway, levees, drainage 
channels, and structures 
Flood detention and conservation 
Floodway, levees, drainage 
channels, and structures 
Marked Tree Siphon 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Authorized Dec. 
Table 41-D. 
See Table 41-C. 
16, 1975. See 
41-20 
Authorized by Public Law 90-147. 
Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 
-- 
Authorized by Public Law 87-874. 
Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 
Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 
Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 
Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 
Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 
Modified in December 1970. See 
Table 41-D. 
Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See 
Table 41-D. 
Mile 605-645 Mississippi River. 
(6) 
Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 
Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 
(5) 
(5) 
Authorized by Public Law 81-516. 
Authorized by Public Law 81-516. 
Authorized by Public Law 81-516. 
260 
0-225 
225 
0-105 
86 
0-36 
0-29

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
TABLE 41-B 
(Continued) 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND 
OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS 
Mileage 
above 
mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 
0-17 
0-12 
0-108 
0-25 
0-20 
0-15 
0-47 
Mayo Ditch 
Cross County Ditch 
Belle Fountain Ditch 
Drainage District No. 17 
L'ANGUILLE RIVER, AR 
L'Anguille River and 
tributaries, Brushy and First 
Creeks 
WEST TENNESSEE 
TRIBUTARIES 
Wolf River and tributaries, TN 
Obion River and tributaries, 
North, South, Middle, and 
Rutherford Forks 
Forked Deer River and 
tributaries, North, Middle, 
and South Forks 
Mud Lake Pumping Station, 
TN 
Harris Fork Creek, TN 
and KY 
Porter Gap, TN 
REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE 
NO. 9, TN AND KY 
Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN 
Bayou du Chien and Lake 
No. 9, KY and TN 
WEST KENTUCKY 
TRIBUTARIES, KY 
Obion Creek, KY 
LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION 
CHANNEL, MO 
Delta to Ancell, MO 
MISSOURI RIVER, MO 
Mouth to St. Charles, MO 
ILLINOIS RIVER, IL 
Mouth to Havana, IL 
Levees 
Levees 
Levees 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement and 
pumping station 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvement 
Pumping plant 
Flood control improvements 
Construction to main-stem 
standards, levee and 
appurtenant structures for 
flood control 
Channel improvement 
Channel improvements and 
pumping station 
Channel improvement 
Mile 49 above Cairo. 
Intermittent (Sec. 6). 
Intermittent (Sec. 6). 
41-21 
Authorized by Public Law 90-483. 
Authorized by Public Law 90-483. 
Authorized by Public Law 80-858. 
(6) 
Authorized by 1948 Flood Control 
Act. 
Authorized by 1948 Flood Control 
Act. 
Authorized by Resolutions Dec. 15 
and 17, 1970.2 
Authorized by Water Resources Act 
of Oct. 22, 1976.2 Section 102, 
1976.2 
Section 183, 1976.2 
Authorized by Public Law 83-780. 
Authorized in December 1970. See 
Table 41-D. 
Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 
0-28 
0-120

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-B 
(Continued) 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND 
OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS 
Mileage 
above 
mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 
OHIO RIVER, IL AND KY 
Cairo to Mound City and Floodwall, levee, revetment, and 
Mounds, IL pumping plant 
1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Atchafalaya Basin protection levees cross 
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, LA, and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Tech 
Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans District. 
2. Also see Table 41-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 
3. Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 
4. Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89-298. 
5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526. 3 See Table 41-D. 
6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 
41-22

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
TABLE 41-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY 
DAMS AND LAKES 
Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello 
Namel Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake 
River 
Nearest town to damsite 
Drainage area, square miles 
Conservation pool: 
Area, thousand acres 
Volume, thousand acre-feet 
Elevation, feet, NGVD 
Flood control pool: 
Area, thousand acres 
Volume, thousand acre-feet 
Runoff, inches 
Outlet gates: 
Number 
Size, feet 
Capacity, thousand cubic 
feet per second 
Spillway: 
Type, uncontrolled 
Length, feet 
Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 
Discharge capacity, thousand 
cubic feet per second 
Surcharge pool: 
Area, thousand acres 
Volume, thousand acre-feet 
Runoff, inches 
Elevation, feet, NGVD 
Dam: 
Type, earthfill 
Length, thousand feet 
Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 
Yalobusha 
Grenada 
1,320 
10 
86 
193.0 
65 
1.252 
17.8 
3
7.5 by 14 
10.7 
Chute 
200 
231.0 
52 
106 
1,385 
19.7 
247.5 
Rolled 
13.9 
256.0 
Yocona 
Enid 
560 
6
58 
230.0 
28 
602 
20.2 
2
8 by 16 
9.4 
Chute 
200 
268.0 
50 
41 
554 
18.5 
284.0 
Rolled 
8.4 
293.0 
Little Tallahatchie 
Sardis 
1,545 
11 
108 
236.0 
58.5 
1,462 
17.7 
4
6 by 12 
10.0 
Chute 
400 
281.4 
132 
90 
1,447 
17.6 
301.0 
Hydraulic 
15.3 
311.4 
41-23 
Coldwater 
Arkabutla 
1,000 
5
31 
209.3 
33 
494 
9.3 
3
8.5 by 19 
10.0 
Chute 
300 
238.3 
89 
63 
858 
16.1 
256.3 
Rolled 
11.5 
264.3 
St. Francis 
Wappapello 
1,310 
4
31 
354.7 
23 
582 
8.4 
3
10 by 20 
18.0 
Gravity 
740 
394.7 
229 
32 
521 
7.5 
413.7 
Rolled 
2.7 
419.7 
1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis, and Arkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, MS; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, 
MO.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Act or 
Authorization Work Authorized Document 
May 15, 1928 
Jun. 19, 1930 
Feb. 15, 1933 
Apr. 23, 1934 
Aug. 30, 1935 
Jun. 15, 1936 
Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River, revetment 
and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel 
depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. 
Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds 
to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in floodcontrol 
works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. 
Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carre' Spillway and 
Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, 
and permits, in said lands. 
Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and 
local levee districts for the cost of, levee rights-of-way for floodcontrol 
work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. 
Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, TN (Nonconnah 
Creek is correct title). 
Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN. 
Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: 
Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, AR. 
Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway; flood 
control, Yazoo River: construction of Morganza floodway; and an 
outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, LA, including a 
6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the 
Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and 
Atchafalaya River; and construction of roads on levees and 
drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. 
Provided for construction of floodwalls, levees, and revetments 
along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of 
Memphis, TN. 
Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined 
reservoir floodway and levee plan. 
Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works 
along Cache River, IL. 
Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets 
and lands therein; including program for the improvement and 
regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and 
Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening 
of levees. 
Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways 
between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood-control works in 
backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous 
Rapides, Beouf, and Cocodrie, LA. 
Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between 
Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River 
Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia, MS. 
Unpublished report on 
record in OCE. 
H. Comm. on Flood Control, 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Comm. on Flood Control, 
Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 359, 77th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 509, 78th Cong., 
2d sess. 
41-24 
H. Doc. 90, 70th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Public Law 395, 71st Cong., 
2d sess. 
Public Law 351, 72d Cong. 
Public Law 171, 73d Cong. 
R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 
72d Cong., 1st sess. 
R&H Comm. Doc. 45, 
74th Cong., 1st sess. 
Unpublished report dated 
Apr. 2, 1925. 
H. Comm. on Flood Control, 
Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Aug. 28, 1937 
Jun. 28, 1938 
Aug. 18, 1941 
Dec. 22, 1944

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Act or 
Authorization Work Authorized Document 
Jul. 24, 1946 
Jun. 30, 1948 
May 17, 1950 
Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization 
program, $200 million. 
Flood control on the Big Sunflower, Little Sunflower, 
Hushpuckena, and Quiver Rivers and their tributaries, and on 
Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal, Bogue Phalia, Ditchlow Bayou, 
Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS.1 
Improve Boeuf and Tenses Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR. 1 
Improve Bayou Lafourche, LA. 
Improve Yazoo River tributaries. 
North bank, Arkansas River levees(below Plum Bayou).1 
Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).1 
Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, LA.1 
Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo 
Basins. 
Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements. 1 
Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, MO. 
Big Sunflower River, etc.1 
Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), TN. 
Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel 
improvement, $100 million. 
Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, MO, with 
respect to West Tennessee tributaries. 
Improve L'Anguille River, AR. 
Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA.1 
Flood protection at Des Arc, AR. 
Improve St. Francis River and Basin, AR and MO. 
Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, AR and MO. 
Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR. 
Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA.1 
Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, LA. 
41-25 
TABLE 41-D 
(Continued) 
Public Law 534, 
78th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 
2d sess. 
S. Doc. 151, 78th Cong., 
2d sess. 
S. Doc. 191, 79th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 
2d sess. 
Public Law 526, 
79th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc. 138, 80th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 516,78th Cong., 
2d sess. 
S. Doc. 51, 80th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Public Law 526, 
79th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 627, 
80th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 651, 
80th Cong., 2d sess. 
H. Doc. 321, 80th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc., 132, 81st Cong., 
1st sess. 
S. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 255, 81st Cong., 
1st sess. 
S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong., 
2d sess. 
Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 
2d sess.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-D 
(Continued) 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Act or 
Authorization Work Authorized Document 
Additiunal protection to Red River Backwater Area. 
Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, LA. 
Bank protection, Amite River, LA. 
Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel 
improvement, $200 million. 
Jonesville, LA, levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure.1 
Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River 
Backwater Area, AR. 
Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River 
to Morgan City, LA. 
Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), MS. 
Improve New Madrid Floodway, MO, including Peafield drainage 
floodgate. 
Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. 
Improve Reelfoot Lake area, KY and TN. 
Improve Greenville Harbor, MS. 
Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou 
Macon in Arkansas. 
White River backwater area pumping plant. 
Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. 
Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-- 
$50 million. 
Modification--Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA. 
Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River 
Basin, MS. 
Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and 
Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, AR. 
Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel 
improvement, $53 million. 
Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of 
main stem project. 
Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas 
and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower 
White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo 
headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Meto. 
Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid 
Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. 
Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 
2d sess. 
Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 
2d sess. 
Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 
2d sess. 
Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 
2d sess. 
S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 
1st sess. 
Public Law 237, 82d Cong., 
1st sess. 
S. Doc. 53, 82d Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 85, 83d Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 183, 83d Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 478, 83d Cong., 
2d sess. 
S. Doc. 160, 83d Cong., 
2d sess. 
S. Doc. 15, 86th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 108, 85th Cong., 
1st sess. 
S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Public Law 86-645. 
Public Law 87-874. 
Public Law 87-874 
Public Law 87-874. 
Public Law 89-42. 
H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 
2d sess. 
41-26 
Oct. 30, 1951 
Sep. 3, 1954 
Jul. 958 
Jul. 14, 1960 
Oct. 23, 1962 
Jun. 18, 1965 
Oct. 27, 1965

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Act or 
Authorization Work Authorized Document 
Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater 
area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). 
Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. 
Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big 
Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and 
Mississippi Delta region. 
Deauthorize Amite River, LA, project. 
Modify St. Francis River, MO and AR, project within District 
No. 7, Poinsett County, AR. 
Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson 
Point, LA. 
Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply 
in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. 
Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities 
along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, LA. 
Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide 
relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. 
Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $100,000 
for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, MS, and $80,000 
for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, MS. 
Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon 
Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, 
AR. 
Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, MO, 
and Drainage District No. 17, AR. 
Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, 
IL, and vicinity. 
Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout 
along David Bayou, MS. 
Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in 
Muddy Bayou, MS. 
Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage 
structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, MS. 
Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee 
drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, LA. 
Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the 
area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, 
LA, that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel 
and Lake Long, and their tributaries. 
H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc., 308, 88th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 
2d sess. 
H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 
2d sess. 
S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., 
1st sess. 
Unpublished Vicksburg 
District's MRC report. 
Approved Apr. 14, 1966. 
H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 
2d sess. 
Public Law 89-789. 
Public Law 89-789. 
Public Law 90-147. 
H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., 
1st sess. 
H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 
2d sess. 
Public Law 90-483. 
Unpublished MRC report 
dated May 8, 1968. 
Unpublished MRC report 
dated Feb. 2, 1970. 
Unpublished MRC report 
dated Mar. 6, 1970. 
Unpublished MRC report 
dated Sep. 22, 1969. 
S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. 
41-27 
TABLE 41-D 
(Continued) 
Apr. 14, 19662 
Nov. 7, 1966 
Nov. 20, 1967 
Aug. 13, 1968 
Sep. 10, 19683 
Mar. 3, 19703 
Apr. 29, 19703 
Jun. 4, 19703 
Dec. 31, 1970

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
(Continued) 
Act or 
Authorization Work Authorized Document 
Senate and 
House Public 
Works 
Resolutions 
adopted Dec. 17 
and 15, 1970, 
respectively. 
River Basin 
Monetary Act 
of Dec. 23, 1971 
Jan. 19, 19732 
TITLE I Water 
Resources 
Development 
Act of 1974. 
Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), 
KY, to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all 
transmission lines required by the project. 
Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, TN and KY, 
authorized: 
a. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel 
improvements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in KY and 
TN. 
b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a 
pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent 
channel improvements. 
Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide 
additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, MS. 
Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive 
development of the basin, $97 million. 
Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve 
local interests of all responsibility except that of providing 
maintenance. 
Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional 
drainage facilities in Long Lake area, vicinity of Helena, AR. 
Projects recommended by four completed reports were 
authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum 
of advance engineering and design on: 
a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, MS. 
b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson 
Counties, MS (Natchez area). 
c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson 
Counties, MS (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). 
d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, LA. 
Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and 
Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, 
recreation, and environmental purposes. 
Modification of the Yazoo Basin, MS, feature to provide for a 
streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta 
and hill areas of basin. 
Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, 
acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized 
mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for 
like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project 
area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized 
mitigation lands in: 
a. Tensas Basin, LA and AR, feature (Red River backwater). 
b. St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature. 
Public Law 91-611. 
H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. 
S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. 
Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. 
Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. 
Unpublished Memphis 
District's MRC report 
dated Oct. 4, 1972. 
Sec. 1, Public Law 93-251, 
Mar. 7, 1974. 
S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. 
H. Doc. 93-157, 1st sess. 
Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. 
Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251. 
Sec. 42, Public Law 93-251. 
41-28

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Act or 
Authorization Work Authorized Document 
I 
TITLE II River 
Basin 
Monetary 
Authorization 
Act of 1974 
River Basin 
Monetary Act 
of Oct. 2, 1975 
Dec. 16, 19752 
TITLE II Public 
Works for 
Water and 
Power 
Development 
and Energy 
Research 
Appropriation 
Act, 1976. 
TITLE II Public 
Works for 
Water and 
Power 
Development 
and Energy 
Research 
Appropriation 
Act, 1977. 
Water Resources 
Development 
Act of 1976. 
Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA, feature, to 
provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from 
Washington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil 
disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional 
culverts through west protection levee. 
Modification of Cache River Basin, AR, feature to provide for: 
acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife 
management, recreation, and environmental purposes. 
Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive 
development of the basin, $211 million. 
Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive 
development of the basin, $158,000,000. 
Modification of St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature to provide 
relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River 
Drainage District of Missouri. 
Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development 
during period Jul. 1-Sep. 30, 1976, $60,300,000. 
Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, 
repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. 
Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase I - Advanced 
Engineering and Design Memoranda-On: 
a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO, project: 
Report of OCE - Sep. 26,1975. 
b. Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS, project: Report of OCE - 
Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: 
Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn 
Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, TN 
and MS. 
Sec. 87, Public Law 93-251. 
Sec. 99, Public Law 93-251. 
Sec. 201, Public 
Law 93-251. 
Mar. 7, 1974. 
Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. 
Unpublished Memphis 
District's MRC report 
dated Nov. 11, 1975. 
Public Law 94-180, 
Dec. 26, 1975. 
Public Law 94-355, 
Jul. 12, 1976. 
Public Law 94-587, 
Oct. 22, 1976. 
41-29 
TABLE 41-D 
(Continued)

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
(Continued) 
Act or 
Authorization Work Authorized Document 
TITLE II Public 
Works for 
Water and 
Power 
Development 
and Energy 
Research 
Appropir :tioi 
Act, 1978. 
Dec. 9, 1977, 5th 
Ind. on VXD 
May 31, 1977, 
Letter eport.2 
Jun. 28, 1980 
Energy and 
Water 
Development 
Appropriation 
Act. 1981 
Supplemental 
Appropriations 
Bill for FY 
Ending 
Sep. 30, 1985 
(PL 99-88), and 
the Water 
Resources 
Development 
Act of 1986 
(PL 99-662) 
Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and 
Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to: 
a. (Sec. 102) - Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork 
Creek, TN and KY: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge 
relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. 
b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and 
appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to 
vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, TN. 
Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, 
repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. 
Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater 
Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant channel 
works in the Six Mile Bayou area of Concordia Parish, LA. 
The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge 
for the preservation and development of environmental 
resources and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which 
otherwise would be required for certain water resources 
projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, 
Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. 
For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood control 
projects, rescue work, repair, restoration or maintenance of 
flood control projects threatened or destroyed by flood, 
$232,519,000: Provided, That not less than $250,000 be 
available for control of bank erosion of streams in the Yazoo 
Basin, including the foothill area. Provided further, That funds 
for the Tensas Basin Red River Backwater Area, be used for 
flood control, etc., for Sicily Island and Below Red River 
including pumping stations. 
Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting 
through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, 
design, engineering, and construction of 41 water resources 
projects, including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. For 
the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing 
is only required for the recreation feature of the project. The 
flood control and environmental features are Federal costs. 
Public Law 95-96 
Aug. 7, 1977. 
Unpublished Vicksburg 
District report dated 
May 31, 1977, on Cynthia 
and Six Mile Bayous, LA. 
Public Law 96-285, 
Jun. 28, 1980. 
Public Law 96-367, 
Oct. 1, 1980. 
FY 1985 Supplemental 
Appropriations Bill 
(PL 99-88), and Water 
Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). 
41-30

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Act or 
Authorization Work Authorized Document 
Water 
Resources 
Development 
Act, 1986 
Energy 
and water 
Development 
Appropriation 
Act, 1994 
Sec. 104(a), Authorization of Projects - Authorization of 
Construction: 
Incorporation of the project for flood control, Louisiana State 
Penitentiary levee, Mississippi River, LA: Report of the Chief 
of Engineers, dated Dec. 10, 1982, at a total cost of $23,400,000, 
with an estimated first Federal cost of $17,600,000 and an 
estimated first non-Federal cost of $5,800,000. No acquisition 
of land for or actual construction of the project may commence 
until appropriate non-Federal interests shall agree to 
undertake measures to minimize the loss of fish and wildlife 
habitat lands in the project area. The work is unscheduled. 
a. Bushley Bayou, LA. Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 authorized the project for flood control, Bushley 
Bayou, LA. 
b. Eight Mile Creek, Paragould, AR. Project entails channel 
improvement along the creek with miniparks and hiking/ 
biking trails. 
c. Helena and Vicinity, AR. The Helena Basin is an urban 
basin containing approximately 3,500 acres which 
frequently and severely floods the city of Helena. A 
pumping station and sump with channel enlargement and a 
gated culvert was recommended. 
d. West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Channel improvements 
along Ten Mile Bayou and Fifteen Mile Bayou for a total of 
23.86 miles, with limited revegetation of right-of-way to 
maintain environmental stability. 
e. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO. Flood 
control for urban and rural land. 
f. Nonconnah Creek and Johns Creek, TN and MS. Channel 
enlargement, recreation features with channel construction 
and environmental enhancement. 
g. Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS. This is an 
urban flood control project located in extreme northwest 
Mississippi and southwest Tennessee. The plan of 
improvement consists of 3.5 miles of selective drift removal 
on lower Horn Lake Creek and 2.6 miles of vegetative 
clearing on Horn Lake Creek, 2.1 miles on Rocky Creek and 
0.6 miles of vegetative clearing and 1.8 miles of channel 
enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. Hike/bike trails are 
included along Rocky Creek and Cow Pen Creek. 
h. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, La. Not mentioned, 
but this Act authorized basic cost sharing principles 
for the project. In particular establishes that the 
fish and wildlife enhancement feature of the project is of 
national significance, and therefore, a 100 percent Federal cost. 
i. Lower Atchafalaya Basin Reevaluation Study. Authority 
to, within available funds, investiage conditions at Wax 
Lake Outlet, Bayou Black, and other features, and 
recommend any modification desirable for flood protection 
navigation, and environmental program. 
Public Law 99-662, 
Nov. 17, 1986. 
41-31 
TABLE 41-D 
(Continued)

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
(Continued) 
Act or 
Authorization Work Authorized Document 
Sec. 601(a) Authorization of Projects. Authorization of 
Construction: 
a. Yazoo Backwater Area, MS. Authorized the project for 
mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at the Yazoo 
Backwater Project, MS. The project shall include 
acquisition of 40,000 acres for mitigation of project-induced 
fish and wildlife losses. 
b. Greenville Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for 
navigation, Greenville Harbor, MS, as contained in the 
reports of Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1977 and 
Feb. 2, 1982, at a total cost of $43,700,000 with an estimated 
first Federal cost of $28,000,000 and an estimated non- 
Federal first cost of $15,700,000. 
c. Vicksburg Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for 
navigation, Vicksburg Harbor, as contained in the report of 
the Chief of Engineers, Aug. 13, 1979, at a total estimated 
first Federal cost of $55,900,000 and an estimated non- 
Federal first cost of $23,300,000. 
d. Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR. The recommended 
plan consists of dredging a navigation channel to provide 
access to 685 acres of landfill; construction of an overlook 
park; implementing landscaping and erosion control 
measures; and mitigation fish and wildlife losses. The 
project is scheduled to be constructed in two phases. 
e. White River Navigation to Batesville, AR. The plan of 
improvement recommended in the Feasibility Report 
provides for construction and maintenance to provide a 
200-foot wide, 9-foot deep channel available 95 percent of the 
time from mile 10 (Arkansas Post Canal) to mile 254, two 
scenic overlooks, a primitive camping area, and acquisition 
of about 1,865 acres of woodlands for mitigation. However, 
section 52 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1988 deauthorized this project. 
f. Obion Creek, KY. To prevent headwater flooding along 
tributary streams and backwater flooding of alluvial lands. 
g. Memphis Harbor, Memphis, TN. This is a navigation 
project in the vicinity of Memphis, TN, which would consist 
of dredging arid maintaining a 4.9 mile long, 500-foot 
minimum width, 9-foot deep general navigation channel 
with additional dredging as required and strategic 
placement of dredged material to create and provide 
navigation access to 1,000 acres to be developed as a 
waterfront industrial complex. 
Sec. 806. Reelfoot Lake, KY. This project is modified to 
provide that the Federal share of the cost of operating the 
pumping plant feature of such project shall be 50 percent. 
Sec. 836. Mud Lake, Western Tennessee Tributaries. This 
project is modified to provide that the requirements of local 
cooperation shall be (1) 50 percent of the value of the lands, 
easements, and rights-of-way, (2) to hold and save the United 
States free from damages due to the construction works, and 
(3) to maintain and operate all the works after completion. 
41-32

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 
Act or 
Authorization Work Authorized Document 
Jun. 4, 1987 
Water 
Resources 
Development 
Act, 1988 
Water 
Resources 
Development 
Act, 1988 
Energy and 
Water 
Development 
Appropriation 
Bill, 1990 
Energy and 
Water 
Development 
Appropriation 
Bill, 1990 
Supplemental 
Appropriations 
Bill for FY 
Ending 
Sep. 30, 1985 
(PL 99-83), and 
the Water 
Resources 
Development 
Act of 1986 
(PL 99-662) 
Water Resource 
Development 
Act, 1992 
Modification of Mississippi Delta Region project to construct 
salinity control structure at Davis Pond (mile 118) rather than 
at Myrtle Grove (mile 59). 
Sec. 3(a), Project Authorizations - Authorization of 
Construction: 
a. Mississippi-Louisiana Estuarine Area, MS and LA. 
Authorized the project for environmental enhancement, 
as contained in the report of Chief of Engineers, dated 
May 19, 1986, at a total cost of $59,300,000. 
Section 4(b) 
West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Modified the project 
by allowing that non-Federal cooperation may be 
provided by levee districts, drainage districts, or 
any unit of a state, county, or local government. 
West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. 
Directed the Corps to develop the most cost-effective 
flood control plan for the City of West Memphis without 
regard to frequency of flooding, drainage area, and the 
amount of runoff. 
Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant 
Directed the Secretary of the Army to incorporate 
existing flood control features for the Bayou Rapides 
Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant into the Lower Red 
River, South Bank Levees portion of the MR&T Project. 
Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA. 
Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting 
through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, 
design, engineering, and construction of 41 water resources 
projects, including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. For 
the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing 
is only required for the recreation feature of the project. The 
flood control and environmental features are Federal costs. 
This act authorized basic cost sharing principles for the project. 
In particular, establishes that the fish and wildlife enhancement 
feature of this project is of national significance and therefore 
a 100% federal cost. 
Whiteman's Creek, Arkansas. 
Directed the Secretary of the Army to implement flood control 
improvement, which essentially consist of 6.1 miles of channel 
enlargement along streams within the city limits of Jonesboro, 
Arkansas. 
Unpublished New Orleans 
District report, 
Nov. 1, 1984. 
Public Law 100-676 
Nov. 17, 1988 
Public Law 100-676, 
Nov. 17, 1988 
Public Law 101-83, 
Jul. 25, 1989 
Public Law 101-514, 
Nov. 5, 1990 
FY 1985 Supplemental 
Appropriations Bill 
(PL 99-88), and Water 
Resoureces Development 
Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). 
Public Law 102-580 
Oct. 31, 1992 
1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries project as shown in Table 41-E. 
2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was approved under delegated authority of the President, Mississippi River 
Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of the 1946 Flood Control Act (Public Law 79-526). 
3. Date minor modification was approved under discretionary authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 15, 1928, Flood 
Control Act, as amended. 
4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. 
41-33 
TABLE 41-D 
(Continued)

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-E INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING 
LEGISLATION 
For Last 
Public Full Report 
Act of Law Authorizing See Annual 
Incorporation No. Act Description Report for 
Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage 1941, p. 943 
improvements, TN 
Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, LA 1946, p. 1029 
Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 From North Little Rock, AR, to Gillett, 1946, p. 1053 
AR, on north bank of Arkansas River 
(portion below Plum Bayou) 
Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Aug. 18, 1941 White River levees, Augusta to 1946, p. 1083 
Clarendon and De Valls Bluff, AR 
Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou 1945, p. 982 
Macon, LA 
Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Big Sunflower River, etc. 1946, p. 1061 
Jun. 30, 1948 80-858 Jul. 24, 1946 Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton 1948, p. 1059 
Rouge, LA (Baton Rouge Harbor) 
May 17, 1950 81-516 Jun. 22, 1936 Jonesville, LA 1953, p. 773 
May 17, 1950 81-516 Jul. 24, 1946 Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, LA 1953, p. 737 
41-34

MISSISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
TABLE 41-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED 
FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS 
Estimated Cost1 
Project Title Fiscal Year 1995 
Completed features2 
Mississippi River levees 
Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN 
Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act 
Channel improvement 
Atchafalaya Basin, LA 
Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA 
Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA 
Old River, LA 
Lower Red River--South Bank Red River levees, LA 
Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, LA 
Mississippi Delta Region, LA 
Tensas Basin, AR and LA 
Lower Arkansas River, AR 
Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, AR (Flood Control & Water Supply) 
Yazoo Basin, MS 
Lower White River, AR (All except Big Creek & Tribs.) 
Lower White River (Big Creek & Tribs.) 
Cache Basin, AR 
St. Francis Basin, AR and MO 
Eight Mile Creek, AR 
L'Anguille Basin, AR 
West Tennessee Tributaries, TN 
Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY 
Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY 
Reelfoot Lake, TN and KY (Completed) 
Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY 
West Kentucky Tributaries, KY 
Sardis Dam (Dam Safety Assurance), MS 
St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO 
Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS 
Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS 
Greenville Harbor, MS 
Memphis Harbor (Ensley Berm), TN 
Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR 
Helena, AR, and Vicinity 
West Memphis, AR, and Vicinity 
Vicksburg Harbor, MS 
Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, LA 
Hickman Bluff, KY 
Whiteman's Creek, AR 
MS-LA Estuarine Area, LA & MS 
$ 239,238,000 
1,452,000,000 
5,270,0003 
4,000,0003 
3,570,000,000 
1,650,000,000 
172,000,000 
20,400,0003 
292,273,000 
23,200,0003 
50,000,0003 
93,700,000 
475,998,000 
29,676,0003 
130,900,0003 
1,948,363,000 
16,802,0003 
55,400,0003 
155,000,000 
381,000,000 
8,570,0003 
13,300,0003 
128,000,000 
14,300,0003 
(11,000,000) 3 
440,000 
10,560,0008 
24,800,0003 
29,200,000 
46,600,000 
18,400,0004 
2,400,0004 
32,400,0003'4 
23,100,0004 
32,156,0004 
7,700,0003,4 
11,600,0004,6 
63,500,0004 
24,800,00047 
3,000,0003 
3,300,000 
59,000,000 
41-35

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-F 
(Continued) 
SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED 
FEDERAL FIRST COST OF 
AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS 
Estimated Cost1 
Project Title Fiscal Year 1996 
Mississippi and Louisiana Estuarine Areas, LA and MS 57,200,0005 
Whiteman's Creek, AR 3,340,000 
Eastern Arkansas, AR 114,0003 
Jackson and Trenton, AR 9,650,0003 
Mississippi Delta, MS 61,600,0003 
Bushley Bayou, LA 37.000,000 
TOTAL $12,334,550,000 
1. Inflation projected through the construction period. Harbors; Lake Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed 
roads. 
2. Includes Bonnet Carre', Morganza, and New Madrid Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg on 
main stem levees; channel construction works; Atchafalaya River and Basin; Wax Lake Outlet; Charenton 
Canal; Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, 
and Des Arc protection works; Baton Rouge Harbor; and miscellaneous features; Teche-Vermilion Basins, 
LA. 
3. Incremental (not projected through the construction period). 
4. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 
5. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100-676, Nov. 18, 1988. 
6. Locals built their own project. 
7. Price Level as of 1988. 
41-36

TABLE 41.G 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM 
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS 
Location Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards 
Mileage Fiscal Year 1996 
Above Head Channel 
District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total 
New Orleans 
Baton Rouge Harbor 
(Devils Swamp) 235 -- 165.7 165.7 
Main stem channel 234-320 -- 157.9 157.9 
Vicksburg 
Main stem channel 322-600 -- 302.2 302.2 
Vicksburg Harbor 437 -- 138.9 138.9 
Greenville Harbor 537 -- 296.6 296.6 
Memphis 
Main stem channel 600-954 -- 13,548.5 13,548.5 
Memphis Harbor, 
McKellar Lake 725 -- 711.8 711.8 
TOTAL -- 15,321.6 15,321.6 
41-37

TABLE 41-H BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: 
NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
erations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 
Standard Revetment: 
Venice, LA............. 
Olga, LA ............... 
Lower Childress- 
Fort Jackson, LA ......... 
Neptune, LA ............ 
Buras, LA .............. 
Tropical Bend, LA ........ 
Bayou Lamoque, LA ...... 
Port Sulphur, LA ......... 
Nestor, LA ............. 
Point Michel, LA ......... 
Bohemia, LA ............ 
Diamond, LA ............ 
Gravolet, LA ............ 
Junior, LA .............. 
Harlem, LA ............. 
Myrtle Grove, LA ........ 
Monsecour, LA .......... 
Alliance, LA ........... 
Belair, LA ............. 
Jesuit Bend, LA .......... 
Linwood, LA ............ 
Oak Point, LA ........... 
Scarsdale, LA ........... 
English Turn, LA ........ 
Poydras, LA ............. 
Twelve Mile Point, LA ..... 
Cutoff, LA .............. 
Third district reach, LA .... 
Algiers Point, LA ......... 
Gouldsboro Bend, LA ...... 
Gretna Bend, LA ......... 
Greenville Bend, LA ...... 
Carrollton Bend, LA ...... 
12 
19 
22 
23 
25 
30 
33 
39 
41 
44 
46 
49 
51 
54 
56 
59 
61 
62 
65 
68 
71 
72 
75 
78 
82 
84 
88 
93 
95 
96 
97 
100 
104 
RL 
RL
RRL
RL
RLRL
RLRLRL 
R
LR
LR 
L
RR 
L
RRRRL 
745 
1,150 
-- 
-- 
-- 
3,000 
2,127 
--. 
-- 
-- 
-- 
--. 
-- 
--_ 
-- 
-- 
-- 
3,000 
2,127 
-- 
-- 
-- 
110 
223 
-- 
-- 
-- 
--. 
--. 
-- 
-- 
110 
223 
--. 
--. 
--. 
N 
2,457 
6,599 
--. 
--
-
- 
--. 
-. 
7,140 
-2,163 
-- 
-- 
2,163 
--. 
--. 
--. 
9,450 
10,832 
--. 
--. 
-- 
--. 
-- 
-- 
--45 
-- ,83 
-- 
-- 40,126 
-- 13,885 
-- 15,430 
-- 14,399 
-- 17,283 
-- 25,012 
-- 21,505 
-- 36,995 
-- 12,506 
-- 22,932 
-- 15,441 
-- 11,600 
-- 23,874 
-- 23,599 
-- 15,148 
-- 17,435 
-- 11,571 
-- 17,265 
-- 26,111 
-- 24,978 
-- 12,005 
-- 15,377 
-- 17,839 
-- 21,845 
-- 45,864 
-- 9,979 
-- 23,234 
-- 27,167 
-- 12,238 
-- 4,960 
-- 9,662 
-- 22,045 
-- 16,262 
0O
O
0n
00 
0
O
C
0

TABLE 41-H BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: 
(Continued) NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) 
Standard Revetment: 
Avondale Bend, LA ....... 109 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 28,409 
Kenner, LA ............... 114 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 41,595 
Luling, LA .............. 119 R 2,945 185 16,262 -- -- -- -- 44,893 
Destrehan, LA ........... . 102 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,409 
Good Hope, LA .......... 126 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 24,531 
Waterford, LA ........... . 128 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,386 
Montz, LA .............. 132 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,502 
Lucy, LA ............... . 136 R -- -- -- -- -- 10,902 -- 19,450 
Reserve, LA ............. . 138 L -- -- -- ..-- -- -- 23,234 
Willow Bend, LA ......... . 141 R -- -- -- -- -- - -- 13,227 
Angelina, LA ............ 145 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,727 
Vacherie, LA ............ 148 R -- -- -- 1,180 9,045 -- -- 26,025 
Belmont, LA . ........... 152 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 25,575 
Rich Bend, LA ........... . 157 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 38,498 
Romeville, LA ........... .161 L 8,020 15 36,007 -- -- -- -- 33,986 
St. Alice, LA ............ 165 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,048 
Burnside, LA ............ 170 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,304 
Aben, LA ................ 172 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,700 
St. Elmo, LA ............ 174 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,014 
Smoke Bend, LA ......... . 177 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,180 
Marchand, LA ........... . 180 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,449 
Philadelphia Point, LA .... 183 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,379 
New River Bend, LA ...... 185 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 45,672 
White Castle, LA ......... . 193 R -- -- -- 2,160 11,462 -- -- 45,968 
St. Gabriel, LA ... ...... .. 201 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 33,292 
Plaquemine Bend, LA ..... 209 R -- -- -- 2,445 12,555 -- -- 45,094 
Manchac, LA ............ 215 L -- -- -- -- -- 11,296 -- 38,976 
Missouri Bend, LA ........ .. 222 R -- -- -- -- -- 13,310 -- 30,437 
Arlington, LA ........... . 227 L 1,435 15 5,559 -- -- -- -- 18,050 
Port Allen, LA ............ 231 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,627 
Scotlandville, LA ......... .. 234 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,623 
Allendale, LA ........... . 238 R -- -- -- -- -- 5,602 -- 28,698 
Springfield Bend, LA ...... 244 L -- -- -- -- -- 21,139 -- 25,690 
Arboth, LA ............. .. 250 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,399 
Faulkner Lake, LA ....... 253 L 1,425 305 8,986 -- -- -- -- 18,807 
Grand Bay, LA .......... .. 258 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,234 
b
I0 
Oin 
x~

TABLE 41-H 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: 
NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) 
Standard Revetment: 
Bayou Sara, LA .......... 
Red Store, LA ........... 
Arrow Bend, LA ......... 
Boies Point, LA .......... 
Morganza, LA ........... 
Iowa Point, LA .......... 
Brunette Point, LA ....... 
Greenwood Bend, LA ...... 
Hog Point, LA ........... 
Carr Point, LA .......... 
Above Old River, LA ...... 
Fort Adams, MS ......... 
Point Breeze, LA ......... 
Coochie, LA ............. 
Palmetto, MS .......... 
Total Revetment 
New Orleans District, 
Mississippi River ..... 
Dikes: 
Profit Island Chute 
Closure, LA ............. 
Hog Point, LA ............ 
Total Dikes 
New Orleans District, 
Mississippi River ..... 
OLD RIVER CONTROL 
Standard Revetment: 
Inflow channel.......... 
Inflow channel ........... 
Outflow channel ......... 
265 
269 
272 
275 
279 
282 
285 
289 
296 
304 
305 
308 
313 
317 
322 
252 
299 
L
R
L
R
RLRLRRRL
RRL 
L
L 
2,024 
2,900 
3,180 
1,788 
237 
300 
460 
75 
8,093 2,110 7,643 
10,890 
18,487 
6,623 
-- 29,722 
-- 18,464 
-- 13,600 
-- 16,094 
-- 20,513 
-- 15,477 
-- 14,335 
-- 25,815 
-- 38,234 
-- 20,725 
-- 9,958 
-- 24,206 
-- 13,565 
-- 17,150 
-- 34,650 
0
0
M
0
Iq 
0
0
H) 
A 
28,844 1,925 131,189 9,790 49,761 71,552 -- 1,868,168 
(5.46 Miles) (1.85 Miles) (353.82 Miles) 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,315 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,850 
11,165 
(2.12 Miles) 
315 L 
315 R 
315 L&R 
-- 2,415 
-- 4,365 
-- 19,891

TABLE 41-H 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: 
NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares) 1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) 
Auxiliary inflow channel ... 312 L&R -- -- -- - - -. - 17,200 
Auxiliary outflow channel .. 312 L&R -- - -- - - .-.- - 5,790 
Total Standard Revetment, 
Old River ........... . - 49,661 
(9.41 Miles) 
ATCHAFALAYA RIVER 
Standard Revetment: 
Mile One, LA........... 
Coville Bayou, LA ........ 
Legonier, LA ............ 
Simmesport, LA ......... 
Kuhlman Bayou, LA ...... 
Odenburg, LA ........... 
Jacoby, LA ............. 
Cason, LA ............. 
McCrea, LA ............ 
Woodside, LA ........... 
Provosty, LA ............ 
Crooked Bayou, LA ....... 
Mercier, LA ............ 
Barberton, LA ........... 
Evans Point, LA ......... 
Goudeau, LA ............ 
Morris Bayou, LA ........ 
Goodwood, LA ........... 
Red Cross, LA ........... 
Melville LA ............. 
Cross Bayou, LA ......... 
Melville South, LA ....... 
Toles, LA ............... 
Petite Prairie, LA ......... 
Below Confluence 
of Red and* 
Atchafalaya 
Rivers 
1
3" 
4
6
7
9 
10 
12 
13 
14 
17 
18 
22 
-23 
24 
26 
27 
28 
29 
30 
31 
33 
35 
36 
L
RL RL 
R
L
RL 
R
LR 
LR 
L
RLRL 
RL 
R
L
R 
1,855 
7,390 
1,640 
9,290 
400 
230 
1,445 
7,712 
19,684 
9,454 
34,319 
- 4,150 
-- 6,550 
-- 8,940 
-- 12,491 
- 5,565 
-- 5,375 
-- 7,390 
- 10,798 
-- 6,572 
-- 13,002 
-- 9,111 
-- 16,246 
- 10,478 
-- 3,592 
-- 6,328 
-- 3,938 
-- 5,440 
-- 8,505 
-- 8,065 
-- 4,870 
-- 6,020 
- 13,340 
-- 6,355 
-- 8,381 
0
z 
?,502

TABLE 41-H 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: 
NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Reinforcement 
(Linear 
Feet) (Squares)1 
Maintenance 
(Squares)' 
Three Mile Bayou, LA ..... 
Holloway Lake, LA ....... 
Bayou Sherman, LA ...... 
Krotz Springs, LA ........ 
Sherburne, LA ........... 
Bayou Big Graw, LA ...... 
Otis Landing, LA ......... 
Morgan City ............ 
Total Standard Revetment 
Alchafalaya River 
Dikes: 
Ten Mile Dikes 
LOWER RED RIVER 
Standard Revetment: 
Long Lake, LA ........... 
Naples, LA ............. 
Turnbull Island, LA ....... 
Total Standard Revetment 
37 
37 
38 
40 
43 
46 
54 
115 
RL
LRRRR 
L 
10 R 
-- -- -- -- -- -- - 6,510 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,085 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,200 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,925 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,035 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,394 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,251 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,410 
20,175 
(3.82 Miles) 
2,500 
(.47 Miles) 
2,075 71,169 7,502 -- 242,332 
(45.90 Miles) 
-- 2,500 
(.47 Miles) 
Below Confluence 
of Old River 
Outflow Channel 
and Red River 
10
7. 
9 
RR 
L 
Above 
Head 
of 
Passes 
(Miles) 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,652 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,190 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,038 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,880 
(4.52 Miles) 
Dikes: 
None 
Location 
Operations This FY 
Construction 
New Work 
Bank 
R
or 
L 
Extension 
(Linear 
Feet) 
Lap 
(Linear 
Feet) 
Nonoperative 
Since 
Prior 
FY 
(Linear 
Feet) 
Operative 
Thru 
This 
FY 
(Linear 
Feet) 
d 
0
O
PI2 
I
0
0
x
O
a

TABLE 41-H BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: 
(Continued) NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet)2 Feet)2 (Squares)2 Feet)2 (Squares) (Squares)2 Feet Feet)2 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 
Foreshore Protection: 
Port Allen .............. 228.3 R -- -- -- - -- -- -- 7,500 
Cottage Plantation ....... . 222.6 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,000 
Upper Plaquemine Point ... 210.5 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 
Lower Plaquemine Point ... 207.0 L -- -- -- -- -- -- - 0 
Point Pleasant ........... . 201.7 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 
Upper Point Clair ........ 196.0 L . - -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 
Point Clair ............. . 191.0 L -- -- -- -- - -- -- 10,251 
Belle Grove ............. . 189.9 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 
Donaldsonville ........... .174.2 R -- -- -- -- -- - - 0 
Point Houmas ........... . 168.9 R 5,400 35,990 -- -- -- -- - 5,400 
Sunshine ................ 167.4 L -- -- -- -- - -- - 900 
Union .................. 166.3 L -- -- -- -- - -- -- 6,500 
Convent ................ 158.3 L 6,200 12,142 -- -- - - - 11,200 
Oak Alley .............. 153.4 R ..-- ---.- -- -- 1,220 -- 7,800 
Lutcher ................. 148.6 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,500 
Wallace ................ 145.5 R -- -- -- -- --- -- 7,200 
Garyville ............... . 140.4 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 
Edgard ................. 138.2 R -- -- -- -- - -- -- 7,700 
Reserve ................ 136.0 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,200 
Waterford .............. 129.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 500 
26 Mile Point ............ 122.8 L -- -- -- -- -.- -- 1,320 
Destrehan .............. 121.0 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 
St. Rose ................. 120.8 L -- -- -- -- -- - -- 9,830 
Lower St. Rose .......... 116.6 L -- -- -- -- -- -- - 3,170 
Ama .................. 115.0 R -- -- -- -- -..- -- -- 0 
American Cyanamid ...... 114.8 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,788 
Willswood .............. 113.2 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,430 
Avondale ............... . 109.4 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,500 
Twelve Mile Point ........ . 108.9 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,580 
Avondale ............... . 105.5 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,070 
Nine Mile Point .......... 105.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,760 
Greenville .............. 100.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,900 
Snowdrift .............. 97.6 R -- - -- -- -- -- -- 8,450 
Gretna-Gouldsboro ....... .. 96.7 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,683 
0
0ro

TABLE 41-H 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: 
NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet)2 Feet)2 (Squares) Feet)2 (Squares)2 (Squares)Z Feet)2 Feet)2 
Foreshore Protection: 
Algiers................. 
Holy Cross............. 
Arabi .................. 
Quarantine ............. 
Huntlee ................ 
Chalmette .............. 
Norman ................ 
Brou ................. 
Auora ................ 
Blythe Blvd ............. 
Upper Stanton ........... 
Saxonholm-Docville ....... 
Pecan Grove-Story ........ 
Story-Allo ............... 
Delacroix ............... 
Twelve Mile Point ........ 
Merrit ................. 
Saxonholm-Docville ....... 
Naval Depot ............ 
Caernarvon ............. 
English Turn ............ 
Little Rock ............. 
St. Claire ............... 
Fort St. Leon ........... 
Scarsdale ............... 
Belle Chase ............. 
Stella-Delcour ........... 
Oak Point .............. 
Promised Land-Woodlawn . . 
Augusta-Live Oak ........ 
Jesuit Bend ............. 
Fanny-Belair ............ 
Sara-Star .............. 
Star ................... 
Bayhi ................. 
95.4 
92.2 
91.9 
91.5 
90.4 
90.2 
90.0 
89.5 
89.3 
88.6 
86.5 
86.0 
85.8 
84.5 
84.2 
83.5 
83.0 
82.5 
82.5 
81.2 
79.3 
78.8 
78.8 
78.2 
75.5 
75.5 
73.6 
73.3 
70.5 
70.5 
69.2 
66.8 
66.3 
65.8 
64.0 
RL 
L
RR 
L
RL
RRRLLLRRLL 
R
LL 
R
L
R
L
R
L
RL
RR
LRRR 
3,350 
-- 
-- 
-- 
-- 
-- 
-- 
2,100 
--. 
7,916 
-- 
-- 
-- 
-- 5,346 
-- 
-- 
-- 
5,346 
-- 
-- 
11,501 
11,996 
.-- 
-- 1,548 
-- 1,915 
-- 6,130 
-- 3,805 
-- 3,139 
-- 1,260 
-- 2,968 
-- 3,030 
-- 3,700 
-- 4,345 
-- 12,890 
-- 1,060 
-- 1,910 
-- 5,400 
-- 8,220 
-- 1,300 
-- 7,800 
-- 7,700 
-- 1,950 
-- 13,200 
-- 7,500 
-- 9,268 
-- 1,025 
-- 10,700 
-- 16,611 
-- 11,500 
-- 6,405 
-- 13,766 
-- 14,465 
-- 13,135 
-- 16,454 
-- 12,400 
-- 2,100 
-- 5,470 
-- 11,190 
0
CI7 
0
U
O
H
O
y
I2 
0

TABLE 41-H 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: 
NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet)2 Feet)2 (Squares)2 Feet)2 (Squares)2 (Squares)' Feet) Feet)2 
Foreshore Protection: 
Burbridge ............. 
St. Rosalie ............. 
Beau-Carlisle ............ 
Alliance ................ 
Monsecour-Poverty Point ... 
Irontown ............... 
Myrtle Grove-Woodpark ... 
Harlem ............... 
Wood Park-Deer Range .... 
Nero ................. 
Deer Range ............ 
Upper Point-A-La-Hache ... 
Junior ................. 
Point Celeste ............ 
Davant ............... 
St. Thomas ............ 
Woodland .............. 
Point-A-La-Hache ........ 
Nolan ................. 
Socola ................. 
Point Michel ............ 
Happy Jack ............. 
Port Sulphur ............ 
Little Texas ............ 
Home Place ............ 
Nairn ................. 
Sixty Mile Point ......... 
Tropical Bend ........... 
Bowers ............... 
Empire ............... 
Anderson ............... 
Fredrick ............... 
Buras ................ 
Lower Buras ............ 
Triumph .............. 
63.2 
62.4 
62.3 
62.0 
60.3 
60.0 
58.8 
57.0 
56.0 
54.7 
54.1 
53.5 
53.5 
52.2 
51.5 
50.0 
50.0 
48.1 
47.2 
46.5 
44.2 
43.0 
39.7 
39.0 
37.6 
34.5 
32.1 
31.2 
30.8 
29.7 
29.2 
27.5 
26.0 
24.0 
22.5 
L
RL
RL
RR 
L
R
L
RL 
R
R
L
LR
LRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 
-6,234 
6,386 
M1 
mCl 
a
9l 
Hg 
8l 
gl 
H
H 
m 
-- 12,335 
-- 6,976 
-- 6,258 
-- 4,300 
-- 5,655 
-- 2,298 
-- 8,450 
-- 15,550 
-- 17,650 
-- 4,450 
-- 4,220 
-- 9,101 
-- 7,811 
-- 3,300 
-- 10,795 
-- 6,430 
-- 14,800 
-- 23,030 
-- 13,400 
-- 8,255 
-- 7,350 
-- 18,785 
-- 6,430 
-- 300 
-- 13,250 
-- 5,915 
-- 0 
-- 5,775 
-- 3,836 
-- 2,865 
-- 6,100 
-- 3,820 
-- 13,495 
-- 8,900 
-- 5,220

TABLE 41-H 
(Concluded) 
BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: 
NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Above 
Head 
of 
Passes 
Location (Miles) 
Bank 
R
or 
L 
Extension 
(Linear 
Feet)2 
Operations This FY 
Construction 
New Work 
Lap 
(Linear 
Feet)2 (Squares)2 
Reinforcement 
(Linear Maintenance 
Feet)2 (Squares)2 (Squares)' 
Foreshore Protection: 
Fort Jackson ............ 
Grand Prairie ........... 
Upper Commander ....... 
Commander ............. 
Boothville-Commander .... 
Upper Venice ............ 
Total Foreshore Protection 
New Orleans District 
Mississippi River ..... 
21.9 
19.2 
18.2 
18.0 
16.0 
12.0 
R
L
R
R
R
R 
13,700 
(2.59 Miles) 
53,478 3,350 
(0.63 Miles) 
7,916 37,337 
-- 16,690 
-- 1,350 
-- 3,180 
-- 22,232 
-- 1,824 
-- 14,800 
0 721,572 
(136.66 Miles) 
1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 
2. Tons. 
Nonoperative 
Since 
Prior 
FY 
(Linear 
Feet)2 
Operative 
Thru 
This 
FT 
(Linear 
Feet)2 
0z 
n
S
0
C12 N
0 
___ 
U
0
O
m
A

TABLE 41-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 
Standard Revetment: 
Bougere Bend, LA ........ 
Dead Mans Bend, MS ..... 
Glasscock Cutoff, MS-LA ... 
Railroad Landing, MS ..... 
St. Catherine Bend, LA .... 
Morville, LA ............ 
Natchez Island, MS ....... 
Carthage, MS ........... 
Vidalia Casting Field ...... 
Natchez Front, MS ....... 
Giles Cutoff, LA-MS ...... 
Gibson, LA ............. 
Ashland, LA-MS ......... 
Kempe Bend, LA ......... 
Browns Field, LA ........ 
Goldbottom, MS .......... 
Hardscrabble, LA ........ 
Grand Gulf, MS .......... 
Point Pleasant, MS-LA .... 
Togo Island, LA .......... 
Lake Karnac, LA-MS ...... 
Diamond Point, LA-MS .... 
Oakbend, MS ............ 
Reid-Bedford, LA ......... 
Racetrack, MS ........... 
Barge Line Terminal, MS .. 
Vicksburg Harbor, MS ..... 
Delta Point, LA .......... 
King's Point--Opposite 
Delta Point, LA-MS ...... 
False Point, LA .......... 
Marshall-Brown's Point, 
LA-MS .............. 
Milliken Bend, LA ........ 
329 
335 
342 
346 
350 
356 
357 
361 
363 
364 
366 
371 
374 
383 
389 
392 
398 
403 
413 
415 
419 
423 
425 
429 
433 
437 
437 
437 
R
LRLRRRLL
LRR L
RR
LR
LRR 
L
R
L
R
L
L
L
R 
4,020! 
2,775 
-- 
150 
-- 
-- 
-- 
-- 
-- 
-- 
--. 
N
M
- 
N 
- 
4,046 
11,004 
10,303 59 
--
-- 
--. 
N
- 
M 
4,972 
11,055 
-- 
-- 
-- 
-- 
-- 
439 L 
443 R 
446 L 
453 R 
-- 26,055 
-- 33,220 
-- 26,083 
-- 12,835 
-- 29,108 
- 16,917 
-- 2,180 
- 14,700 
- 2,670 
- 6,510 
- 12,020 
- 26,000 
- 33,427 
- 28,285 
- 9,280 
- 30,250 
-- 22,530 
-- 53,948 
-- 32,345 
-- 7,080 
-- 19,260 
-- 15,725 
-- 2,775 
-- 18,392 
-- 13,935 
-- 3,040 
-- 7,350 
-- 7,650 
-- 19,330 
-- 12,860 
-- 19,580 
-- 46,140 
A
M-+ 
fI 
8
Ix

TABLE 41-I 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) 
Standar Revetment: 
Belle Island, LA-MS ...... 
Goodrich, LA ............ 
Cottonwood Bar, MS ...... 
Filter-Cottonwood, MS ..... 
Hagaman, LA ........... 
Ben Lomond, MS ......... 
Baleshed Towhead-Stack 
Island, LA-MS .......... 
Lake Providence, LA ...... 
Mayersville, MS ......... 
Sarah Island-Opossum 
Point, LA-MS .......... 
Carolina, MS ........... 
Cracraft, AR ............ 
Worthington, MS-AR ...... 
Walnut Point Kentucky 
Bend, MS ............ 
American Cutoff, MS-AR ... 
Sunnyside-Lakeport, AR ... 
Vancluse, AR ........... 
Island 84, AR-MS ........ 
Warfield Point, MS ....... 
Leland-LaGrange, AR-MS .. 
Spanish Moss, AR ........ 
Tarpley Island, MS ....... 
Miller Bend, MS ......... 
Island 82, AR ........... 
Ashbrook Island, MS ...... 
Arkansas City-Yellow 
Bend, AR .............. 
Huntington Point, MS ..... 
Pair O'Dice, AR .......... 
Eutaw-Mounds, MS ....... 
Cypress Bend, AR ........ 
Catfish Point, MS ........ 
460 
467 
470 
474 
481 
486 
L
RR
LR 
L 
10,245 
-- 
-- 
39,084 
--
--. 
488 R 
489 R 
497 L 
501 
507 
511 
514 
519 
526 
530 
534 
535 
537 
538 
539 
542 
544 
546 
549 
553 
556 
561 
563 
568 
573 
RL
RR 
L
L
R
RL 
L
LRR 
L
RR 
R
L
R
L
RL 
13,771 
-- 
-- 
-- 
1,320 
2,830 
50 
150 
-- 24,160 
-- 40,765 
-- 18,580 
-- 38,672 
-- 37,756 
-- 10,235 
-- 52,1242 
-- 11,600 
-- 34,992 
-- 26,815 
-- 11,080 
-- 22,210 
-- 8,350 
45,653 
2,980 
33,685 
13,016 
13,475 
4,320 
14,150 
4,580 
2,000 
29,360 
3,080 
3,455 
44,335 
21,205 
9,095 
40,188 
34,405 
20,075 
7,176 
10,975 
CU
0U
0I
0
0l 
0d

TABLE 41-I 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) 
Standard Revetment: 
Ozark, AR-MS ........... 
Prentiss, AR-MS ......... 
Rosedale Bend, AR ....... 
Riverton, MS ............ 
Klondike, AR ............ 
Victoria Bend-Terrene, MS . 
Lake Concordia, MS ...... 
Big Island, AR ........... 
Smith Point, MS ......... 
Dennis, MS ............. 
Cessions, MS ............ 
Total Revetment, 
Vicksburg District, 
Mississippi River ....... 
Dikes: 
Jackson Point, MS ........ 
Buck Island, MS ......... 
Opposite Warnicott Ldg., 
MS ................. 
Natchez Island, LA-MS .... 
Waterproof Bar, LA ....... 
Spithead Towhead, MS .... 
Browns Field, LA ........ 
Cottage Bend, LA-MS .... 
Bondurant Towhead, LA ... 
Coffee Point, LA ........ 
Yucatan, MS ............ 
Togo Island, LA .......... 
Below Racetrack, MS ...... 
Racetrack Towhead, MS . .. 
False Point, LA .......... 
Marshall Cutoff, LA ...... 
Below Grand Gulf, MS .... 
578 
582 
585 
586 
588 
593 
596 
598 
601 
611 
615 
RLLL 
R
LLRL 
L
L 
21,190 
(4.01 Miles) 
330 L 
339 L 
352 
358 
379 
386 
388 
389 
394 
405 
410 
416 
430 
431 
441 
448 
399 
LRR
LR 
L
RRRL 
L
RRRL 
350 67,538 15,109 
.. 
26,314 
8,687 
64,799 
(3) 
15 -- 
5,440 
170 
3,155 
2,300 
4,390 
1,020 
6,355 
2,630 
5,450 
--. 
- 22,015 
- 20,315 
- 4,820 
- 12,500 
-- 23,400 
-- 29,245 
- 6,980 
- 16,515 
- 18,185 
- 25,195 
- 10,910 
- 1,477,956 
(279.92 Miles) 
- 4,306 
-- 6,334- 
- 10,791 
- 14,608- 
-- 14,580 
-- 9,681 
-- 10,917 
-- 14,049 
- 6,029 
-- 11,925 
-- 9,010 
-- 8,256 
-- 14,859 
-- 15,270 
-- 5,675 
-- 5,166 
-- 3,575 
I
0
x

TABLE 41-I 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Above 
Head 
of 
Passes 
Location (Miles) 
Bank 
R 
or
L 
Extension 
(Linear 
Feet) 
Operations This FY 
Construction 
New Work 
Lap 
(Linear 
Feet) 
Reinforcement 
(Linear 
(Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 
Maintenance 
(Squares)' 
Dikes: 
Fritz Island, LA .......... 
Forest Home Towhead, LA . 
Willow Cutoff, LA ........ 
Tennessee Bar, MS ....... 
Arcadia Point, MS ........ 
Cottonwood Bar, MS ...... 
Point Lookout, LA ........ 
Ajax Bar, MS ............ 
Ben Lomond, MS ......... 
Baleshed Ldg., MS ....... 
Wilson Point, LA ......... 
Corregidor, MS .......... 
Carolina, AR ........... 
Cracraft Lower, AR ....... 
Cracraft, AR ............ 
Leota, MS .............. 
Island 86, AR ........... 
Seven Oaks, AR .......... 
Walnut Point, MS ........ 
Anconia Chute, AR ....... 
Refuge, MS ............. 
Island 84, AR .......... 
Warfield Point, AR ....... 
Leland Bar, AR-MS ....... 
Leland Neck, AR-MS ...... 
Tarpley Cutoff, MS-AR .... 
Island 82-Miller Bend, 
AR-MS .............. 
Ashbrook-Miller Bend, 
AR-MS .............. 
Ashbrook Cutoff, MS ...... 
Chicot Ldg., AR .......... 
Catfish Point, MS ........ 
Below Prentiss, MS ....... 
Malone Field, AR ......... 
338 
449 
462 
465 
470 
471 
478 
482 
488 
493 
500 
505 
509 
510 
513 
514 
520 
523 
525 
527 
528 
532 
535 
538 
540 
540 
R
L
R
L
L
R
R
L
L
L
R
L
L
R
R
L
R
R
L
R
L
L
L
R
L
R 
(3) 
2,240 
4,580 
1,410 
4,530 
2,020 
--
-- 
--. 
--. 
-- 
--. 
--41 
--. 
--
--53 
--02 
-- 
544 R&L 
547 
549 
564 
571 
580 
585 
L&R 
L
RLL 
R 
-- 4,160 
-- 1.3,533 
-- 4,275 
-- 4,580 
-- 9,463 
-- 2,406 
-- 2,751 
-- 28,152 
-- 24,667 
-- 15,091 
-- 8,423 
-- 6,730 
-- 2,897 
-- 10,329 
-- 3,809 
-- 7,571 
-- 18,477 
-- 5,829 
-- 4,725 
-- 4,604 
-- 19,695 
-- 12,475 
-- 2,020 
-- 15,086 
-- 4,315 
-- 10,478 
-- 13,646 
4,930 
4,600 
13,015 
8,728 
22,381 
5,290 
12,413 
7,549 
Nonoperative 
Since 
Prior 
FY 
(Linear 
Feet) 
Operative 
Thru 
This 
FY 
(Linear 
Feet) 
0
0
cI 
0
0A 
0
0
a- 
1,655

TABLE 41-I 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Square1s) Feet) Feet) 
Dikes: 
Terrene, MS ............ 
White River Landing, AR .. 
Montgomery Towhead, AR.. 
Victoria Bend, AR ........ 
Smith Point, MS ......... 
Island 70, MS ........... 
Total Dikes, 
Vicksburg District, 
Mississippi River ....... 
590 
591 
592 
596 
600 
608 
L
RRRLL 
(3) 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,921 
............ 2,201 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,201 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,071 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,736' 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,617 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,355 
49,637 
(9.40 Miles) 
17,110 -- 563,607 
(106.74 Miles) 
Miles 
Above 
Mouth 
ARKANSAS RIVER4 
Standard revetment: 
Menard Bend, AR ........ 
Como, AR .............. 
Morgan Bend, AR ........ 
Yancopin, AR ........... 
Total Standard Revetment, 
Arkansas River ........ 
Dikes: 
Hopedale Cutoff, AR ...... 
Morgan Bend, AR ........ 
Fletcher Bend, AR ........ 
Total Dikes, Arkansas 
River ................ 
31 
34 
36 
24 
30 
36 
39 
L
R
L
R
R
LR 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,770 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,720 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,250 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,800 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,540 
(5.97 Miles) 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,848 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,658 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,187 
-- 7,693 
(1.46 Miles) 
O
I
0

TABLE 41-I 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) 
RED RIVER5 
Standard Revetment: 
Dupre, LA ............. 
Bringol, LA ............ 
Egg Bend, LA ........... 
Cologne Bend, LA ........ 
Roxana, LA ............ 
Ryland, LA ............. 
Whittington, LA ......... 
Smith, LA ............. 
Latanier, LA ............ 
Hudson, LA ............ 
Robert, LA............. 
Alexandria Front, LA ..... 
Callahan, LA ........... 
Cotton, LA............. 
Rapides, LA............ 
Boyce, LA .............. 
Total Standard Revetment, 
Red River ............ 
Dikes6 : 
Choctaw Bayou Bend, LA .. 
Bringol (Egg Bend), LA .... 
Egg Bend, LA ........... 
Cologne Bend, LA ........ 
Echo, LA .............. 
Richardson, LA .......... 
69 
73 
75 
77 
83 
88 
89 
91 
93 
99 
102 
105 
110 
116 
119 
125 
RRRRRRRR
RRRRRRR 
R 
- -- - - -- - - 2,690 
- -- -- -- - -- - 4,000 
- -- -- - - -- - 2,400 
- -- -- - - -- - 650 
.-- -- - - -- - 3,325 
-- -- -- -- - - - 3,925 
-- -- -- - - -- - 2,900 
-- -- -- -- - - - 2,700 
- -- -- -- - -- - 2,460 
----- -- -- - - - 1,458 
- -- -- - - -- - 5,500 
-- -- -- -- - - - 5,280 
- - -- - - - - 4,000 
-- -- -- - -- - - 14,700 
- -- ----- - -- -- 1,030 
-- -- -- -- - -- - 4,548 
- 61,566 
(11.66 Miles) 
71 
73 
75 
77 
78 
79 
R
RRRRR 
2,000 
2,477 
900 
1,850 
1,900 
2,700 
0KI 
0K
0
0
A. 
r

TABLE 41-I 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY IF 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Lineer 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares) 1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) 
Dikes: 
Alexandria, LA 105 R - - - - - - (Rock groin) 270 
Bertrand, LA............ 122 R - - -- - - - - 7,630 
Total Dikes, Red River ... - - - -- - 19,727 
(3.74 Miles) 
Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 
Contains 7,814 linear feet of trenchfill revetment (stone). 
Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 
See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK, under Little Rock District. 
Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. 
Includes all types of dikes and retards. 
Stone Paving only. 
Correction of previous error. 
1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
I
I
zo

TABLE 41-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 
Standard Revetment: 
Big Island, AR .......... . . 598 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,905 
Scrubgrass Bend, AR ...... 600 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,315 
Henrico, AR . . . . . . . . . . . . . 606 R -- -- -- -- -- 21,338 -- 33,310 
Cessions Towhead, AR ..... 615 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,465 
Island 67, MS ........... . 621 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,630 
Island 68 Bar-- 
Knowlton, AR . . . . . . . . . . 622 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,710 
Ludlow, AR ............. . 626 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,390 
Rescue Land, AR-MS ...... 629 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 27,020 
Fair Landing, AR ........ 632 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 25,690 
Burke Landing, MS ....... . 637 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,070 
Island 62, AR ............ 638 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,030 
Island 63, MS ............ 639 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,514 
Island �3 Bar, MS ........ 639 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,795 
Oldtown Bend, AR ........ 644 R -- -- -- -- -- 2,729 -- 26,860 
Horseshoe, MS .......... 647 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,385 
Westover, AR ........... . 650 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,640 
Delta-Friars Point, MS .... 665 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 30,090 
Helena, AR .............. 660 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 36,460 
Helena Towhead, AR ...... 664 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,690 
Trotters Landing, MS ..... 665 L -- -- -- -- -- 5,441 -- 50,930 
Flower Lake, MS ......... .. 667 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,385 
St. Francis, AR . . . . . . . . . . 672 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 24,663 
Harbert Point, MS ........ .. 675 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,065 
Walnut Bend, AR ........ .. 680 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,070 
Mhoon Bend, MS ......... .. 685 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 35,828 
Peters, AR .............. 692 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 33,760 
Commerce, MS . . . . . . . . . 695 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,085 
Porter Lake, AR ......... . 700 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 34,155 
Pickett, MS-AR .......... 703 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,575 
Seyppel, AR ............. . 709 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,830 
Norfolk-Star, MS ......... .711 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 35,582 
Cow Island Bend, AR ..... 714 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,274 
O
0
C, 
O
U. 
0
0r' 
0
C,, 
0

TABLE 41-J 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) 
Standard Revetment: 
Cow Island Bend 
(Upper), TN........... 
Coahoma, TN ........... 
Ensley, TN ............. 
Dismal Point, AR ......... 
Bauxippi-Wyanoke, AR .. . 
Presidents Island, TN ..... 
Hopefield Point, AR-TN .... 
Loosahatchie-Memphis, 
TN .................. 
Loosahatchie Bar, TN ..... 
St. Clair, AR ............ 
Island 40, TN-AR ........ 
Brandywine, AR-TN ...... 
Shelby Forest, TN ........ 
Dean Island, AR ......... 
Cedar Point-Densford, 
TN .................. 
Chute of Island 35, TN .... 
Lookout Bar, TN ......... 
Lookout, TN ............ 
Sunrise Towhead, TN ...... 
Lower Bullerton, AR ...... 
Kate Aubrey Towhead- 
Island 30, TN .......... 
Osceola, AR ............ 
Osceola, AR ............ 
Ashport-Keyes Point, TN . .. 
Kate Aubrey, TN ......... 
Island 26, TN .......... 
Bend of Island 25, TN ..... 
Barfield, AR ........... 
Obion-Tamm, TN ......... 
Huffman-Hickman, 
AR-TN ............... 
716 
717 
723 
724 
730 
733 
736 
737 
740 
742 
744 
750 
753 
756 
759 
764 
772 
774 
776 
782 
786 
786 
786 
791 
793 
798 
803 
808 
819 
RLL
RRL 
R
L
RRRR 
L
R
LRRRRR 
RRR 
L
RR 
L
RL 
2,230! 
-- 
-- 
5302 
1,280 
-- 8,623 
-- 9,270 
-- 46,256 
-- 7,200 
-- 24,530 
-- 12,755 
-- 10,360 
-- 31,293 
-- 2,070 
-- 2,930 
-- 30,750 
-- 18,010 
-- 9,550 
-- 7,555 
65 
-- 
4,772 
-- 
2,495 
--. 
20,190 
30,930 
2,990 
5,005 
18,275 
28,350 
30,808 
1,3503 
5,823 
44,232 
2,500 
15,690 
31,565 
52,335 
53,831 
6,949 
-M 
826 R 2,780 
0I 
145 3,5 -- 29,764

TABLE 41-J 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) 
Standard Revetment: 
Heloise, TN ............. 
Island 18, MO ........... 
Linwood Bend, TN ........ 
Blaker Towhead, TN ...... 
Bells Point, MO .......... 
Gayoso-Caruthersville, 
MO .................. 
Island 15, TN .......... 
Hathaway Landing, TN .... 
Robinson Bayou, MO ...... 
Fritz Landing, TN ........ 
Lee Towhead, MO ........ 
Bend of.Island 14, TN ..... 
Above Lee Towhead, TN ... 
Little Cypress, MO ....... 
Merriwether-Cherokee, 
TN .................. 
Linda, MO .............. 
Below Toney's Towhead, 
TN .................. 
Toney's Towhead, 
KY-TN .............. 
Kentucky Point, KY ....... 
New Madrid Bar, KY ...... 
New Madrid Bend, MO .... 
La Forge, MO ........... 
Slough Landing Neck, 
TN-KY ............... 
Winchester Towhead, 
MO .................. 
Island 9, KY-TN ......... 
Milton Bell, MO ......... 
Chute of Island 8, KY ..... 
Bend of Island 8, MO ..... 
Island 8, KY ............ 
831 
836 
841 
845 
845 
848 
851 
852 
852 
857 
859 
859 
861 
864 
L
RLL 
R
RLL
RLLLLR 
869 L 
876 R 
879 L 
882 
887 
888 
889 
892 
2,835 
3,990 
-- 
10 
-- 
8,231 
16,388 
108! 
-- 
22,659 
10,309 
25,646 
3,495 155 8,869 
L
LRRR 
9,068 
--. 
899 L 
900 
905 
908 
913 
914 
914 
R
L
RL
RR 
5,149 
-- 
8,600-! 
15,770 
28,230 
14,850 
18,562 
5,420 
25,600 
3,630 
1,000 
22,630 
15,670 
9,640 
12,050 
4,943 
40,140 
- 41,058 
-- 20,000 
- 20,895 
-- 13,640 
-- 7,960 
-- 16,825 
-- 43,262 
-- 24,930 
- 37,520 
-- 5,540 
-- 33,585 
-- 16,600 
-- 12,620 
-- 39,945 
-- 18,515 
0
0
O
y
O
O
O
x
0
0
0

TABLE 414J 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) 
Standard Revetment: 
Hickman-Reelfoot, KY ..... 
Beckwith Bend, MO ...... 
Williams, KY ............ 
Wolf Island, KY .......... 
Columbus, KY ........... 
Belmont, MO ............ 
Island 3 and 4, KY ....... 
Campbell, KY ........... 
Pritchard, MO ........... 
Mayfield Creek, KY ....... 
Wickliffe, KY ............ 
Cache-Cairo, IL 
(Ohio River) ........... 
Total Revetment, 
Memphis District, 
Mississippi River ....... 
Dikes: 
Henrico, AR ............. 
Below Knowlton, AR ...... 
Island 67, MS ........... 
Below Ludlow, AR ......... 
Sunflower, AR ........... 
Island 64, AR ........... 
Island 62, AR ........... 
Island 63 Bar, MS ........ 
Island 63, MS ........... 
Kangaroo Point, AR ....... 
Friars Point, MS ......... 
Montezuma Bar, MS ...... 
Montezuma Towhead, AR .. 
Prairie Point, AR ......... 
Flower Lake, MS ......... 
919 
924 
927 
934 
937 
938 
940 
943 
948 
949 
953 
L
RL
RL
RRL 
R
LL 
958 R 
3,0407- 
3,290 
1,390 
70 8,625 
5 3,842 4,921 
46,399 
14,588 
10,015 
22,495 
7,395 
5,785 
19,970 
6,865 
15,045 
8,935 
9,845 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,927 
33,460 
(6.34 Miles) 
450 54,592 2,495 6,949 
(8) 
603 
616 
621 
624 
627 
630 
638 
639 
640 
649 
652 
657 
656 
668 
668 
R
RLRL
RR 
L
L
R
L
L
RRL 
107,260 
(6) 
2,900 
4,500 
1,060 
5,280 
-- 2,031,255 
(384.71 Miles) 
-- 9,080 
-- 20,670 
-- 4,320 
-- 5,040 
-- 5,520 
-- 7,330 
-- 23,180 
-- 2,600 
-- 5,640 
-- 5,730 
-- 6,870 
-- 15,240 
-- 3,450 
-- 10,391 
-- 11,060 
U, 
U, 
U, 
00 
0
zl

TABLE 414J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT 
(Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thra 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares) 1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) 
Dikes: (8) (6) 
St. Francis Towhead, MS ... 671 L -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,380 
Below Walnut Bend, AR ... 676 R - -- -- -- - -- -- 6,420 
Bordeaux Point, MS ...... 681 L -- -- --- - -- -- 11,080 
Peters, AR .............. 693 R -- -- -- -- - 100 -- 7,830 
Commerce, MS .......... ... 694 L -- - -- -- - -- - 10,745 
Basket Bar, AR . . . . . . . . . . 696 R -- -- -- -- - -- - 5,560 
Buck Island, MS ......... . 700 L - -- - -- - -- -- 4,705 
Porter Lake, AR ......... .. 701 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,315 
Pickett, MS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 704 L -- -- -- -- - -- -- 7,180 
Seyppel, AR ............. . 706 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,250 
Cat Island, AR .......... 710 R -- -- -- -- -- 200 -- 15,590 
Coahoma, TN ........... ... 718 L -- -- - -- - -- - 4,640 
Armstrong, AR-TN ...... 720 R - -- -- -- - - -- 18,690 
Dismal Point, AR ......... ... 724 R -- -- -- -- -- 1,130 0 - 25,510 
Engineers Bar, AR ....... 734 R -- -- -- -- -- 3,900 -- 4,155 
Hopefield Point, AR ....... .. 736 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,350 
Memphis Front, TN ....... . 736 L -- -- -- -- - -- -- 6,300 
Robinson Crusoe, TN ...... 738 R -- -- - -- .- -- -- 21,939 
Loosahatchie Bar, TN ..... 739 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,950 
Sycamore Chute, AR-TN ... 741 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,725 
Above Loosahatchie, TN ... 742 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,645 
Redman Point, AR ........ 743 R -- -- -- -- - -- -- 7,750 
Randolph Point, TN ....... . 747 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,740 
Poker Point, AR .......... 748 R -- -- -- -- - -- - 8,060 
Shelby Forest, TN ........ 751 L 1,630 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,630 
Corona Bar, TN-AR ....... . 755 R 970 -- - -- -- -- -- 9,400 
Densford, TN ............ 757 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,780 
Cedar Point, TN......... .. 759 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,890 
Below Richardson 
Landing, TN ........... . 767 L -- -- -- -- -- 200 -- 5,950 
Lookout, TN-AR ......... ... 771 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,865 
Plum Point, TN .......... 784 L 500 3,185 -- -- - -- -- 10,195 
Lake Neark, AR ......... . 786 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,545 
Island 30 ............... . 787 R 2,475 370 -- -- -- 375 -- 5,485 
Kate Aubrey, TN ......... .. 791 R -- -- -- -- -- 2,000 -- 11,270 
I0 
Hn 
0
H
0
0
O

TABLE 41-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT 
(Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) 
Dikes: (8) (6) 
Keyes Point, TN ......... ... 791 L - 3,130 -- -- -- 2,100 -- 24,690 Ashport-Goldust, TN-AR ... 795 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,330 
Forked Deer, TN ......... . 798 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,550 
Island 25, AR ........... . 804 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,450 
Nebraska Point, TN ....... . 808 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,149 
Below Tamm Bend, TN .... 813 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,300 
Wrights Point, AR ........ 820 R -- -- -- -- -- ...- 34,775 
Island 21, Chute, TN ...... 824 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,170 
Head of Island 21, TN ..... 828 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,540 
Island 20, MO-TN ........ 831 R 5,115 -- -- -- -- 300 -- 23,254 
Island 18, TN ........... ... 837 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,670 
Tennemo, TN ........... .842 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,240 
Blaker Towhead, TN ...... 843 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,080 
Caruthersville-Linwood 
Bend, MO ............. . 844 R 1,960 6,090 -- -- -- -- -- 30,590 
Opposite Carthersville, TN . 846 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,300 
Sandy Hook, TN ......... . 850 R -- -- -- -- -- - -- 2,350 
Island 15, TN ........... . 851 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,830 
Robinson Bayou, MO ...... 853 R -- -- -- -- -- 40 -- 10,768 
Hathaway, TN ........... . 854 L -- -- -- -- -- 1,400 -- 27,355 
Island 15 Neck, TN ....... .. 854 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 21,100 
Above Lee Towhead, TN ... 859 L -- -- -- - -- -- -- 1,300 
Below Cherokee, TN ...... 866 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,230 
Stewart Towhead, MO ..... 871 R -- -- - -- -- -- -- 18,290 
Ruddles Point, MO ....... 874 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,130 
Island 11, MO ........... . 882 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,330 
New Madrid Bend, MO .... 887 R -- -- -- -- -- 1,400 -- 1,715 
Kentucky Point, KY ....... 887 L - -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,400 
Morrison Towhead, MO .... 890 R -- -- - -- -- -- -- 1,070 
Hotchkiss Bend, MO ...... 895 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,208 
Slough Landing, KY ...... 896 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,065 
Below Island 9, TN ....... . 901 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,859 
Donaldson Point, MO ..... 905 R -- -- -- -- - -- -- 18,225 
Island 9, KY ............ 906 L -- -- -- - -- -- -- 7,0105 
Island 7 - Island 8, MO-KY . 917 R - -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,795 
U) 
U) 
U)
I0 
O
x

TABLE 41-J 
(Continued) 
BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- 
Construction erative tive 
Above New Work Since Thru 
Head Bank Exten- Prior This 
of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY 
Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear 
Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) 
Dikes: (8) (6) 
Below Williams, KY ....... .925 L -.-- -- -- -- -- 2,160 
Moore Island, KY-MO ..... 929 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,925 
Above Williams, KY ....... . 930 L -- -- - -- -- -- -- 1,150 
Wolf Island Bar, KY 933 L 12,260 -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,260 
Campbell, KY ........... . 942 L -- -- -- -- -- -- - 2,610 
Pritchard, MO ........... . 944 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,390 
Island 1, KY ............ 948 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,345 
Total Dikes 
Memphis District, 
Mississippi River ....... 24,910 12,775 -- -- -- 26,855 -- 926,598 
(4.72 Miles) (175.49 Miles) 
1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 
2. Changed to correct previous errors. 
3. Lumber mattress revetment. 
4. Rock Groins. 
5. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. 
6. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 
7. Stone paving only. 
8. Linear feet of dike which were raised. 
9. Dyersburg Boat Ramp. 
b
O
H
O
0Tj 
0
0
00 
0
rm 
0
0C 
0

TABLE 41-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Leveesand Floodwalls Berm Surs.d oad. on 
(Miles) (Miles) (Miles) 
Built to 
Approved 
Grade and Total 
Total Section Cur- In Comr- Cur- In Cornin 
Total rently System plete rently System plte 
Authorised Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru 
for This This This Con- Comrn- This This Con- Com- This This 
Location System FY FY FY struction pleted1 FY FY struction pleted FY FY 
Main Stem Levees 
Mississippi River Levees 
Fifth Louisiana Levee District .. 
Levees.................. 
Old River structures and 
levees ................... 
Atchafalaya Basin Levee 
District .................. 
Levees ................... 
Morganza structure and 
levee ................... 
Morganza forebay levee ...... 
Port Allen lock ............ 
Lafourche Basin Levee District 
Levees ................... 
Plaquemines West Levee 
District Levees ............ 
Buras Levee District ......... 
Levees................... 
Empire lock .............. 
Baton Rouge front levees ...... 
Pontchartrain Levee 
(16.8) (16.8) (--) (13.3) (--) 
15.5 15.5 - 12.0 - 
1.3 1.3 - 1.3 - 
(126.3) (126.3) (-) (102.2) (17.9) 
118.7 118.7 - 94.6 17.9 
0.8 
6.7 
0.1 
61.7 
37.9 
(34.1) 
34.0 
0.1 
2.1 
0.8 
6.7 
0.1 
(-) (--) (--) (-) (15.5) 
- - -- 15.5 
(5.3) (--) (1.0) 
5.3 - 1.0 
(-) (118.7) 
- 118.7 
(-) (15.5) 
- 15.5 
- -w 
(-) (118.7) 
- 118.7 
- 0.8 
- 6.7 
- 0.1 
61.7 7.1 48.2 13.5 
37.9 - 30.7 - 
(34.1) - (34.1) (--) 
34.0 - 34.0 - 
0.1 - 
2.1 1.0 
0.1 
1.9 
District .................. (124.9) (124.9) (12.3) (107.2) 
Levees ................... . 110.8 110.8 12.3 93.1 
Bonnet Carre' guide levees ... 11.3 11.3 - 11.3 
Bonnet Carre' forebay levee .. 1.3 1.3 - 1.3 
Bonnet Carre' structure ..... 1.5 1.5 - 1.5 
East Jefferson Levee District 
Levees.................. . 
West Jefferson Levee District .. 
Levees ............. ..... 
Floodwalls ................ 
Harvey Canal Lock ......... 
11.6 
(20.0) 
19.8 
0.1 
0.1 
(4) 
4 
11.6 - 10.8 - 
(20.0) (3.1) (20.0) (--) 
19.8 3.1 19.8 - 
0.1 - 0.1 - 
0.1 - 0.1 - 
0.1 - 0.1 - 61.7 - 61.7 - 
- - - - 37.9 - 37.9 - 
(--) (--) (-) (-) (34.0) (-) (34.0) (-) 
S- - - 34.0 - 34.0 - 
- - - - 2.1 - 2.1 - 
(4.7) (--) 
4.7 - 
- -w 
-M 
(--) 
-M 
-M 
(--) 
-w 
(--) 
-w 
-w 
(--) 
-Y 
(-) (110.8) 
- 110.8 
- -w 
(-)
-w 
11.6 
(19.9) 
19.8 
0.1 
(-) (110.8) 
- 110.8 
-- 
(-) 
Currently 
Under 
Construction 
(--) 
(-) 
- 
(-) 
(--) 
-
- 
11.6 
(19.9) 
19.8 
0.1

TABLE 41-K 
(Continued) 
PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Lev 
(Mile.) (Mile) (Miles) 
Built to 
Approved 
Grade and Total 
Total Section Cur- In Cornm- Cur- In Cornin 
Total rently System plete rently System plete 
Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru 
for This This This Con- Conm- This This Con- Com- This This 
Location System FY FY FY struction pletedI FY FY struction pleted FT FY 
Orleans Levee District. ....... 
Left descending, east bank ..... 
Levees ................... 
Floodwalls................ 
IHNC lock................ 
Right descending, west bank ... 
Levees................... 
Algiers Canal lock .......... 
Lake Borgne Basin Levee 
District Levees ............ 
Grand Prairie Levee District 
Levees .................. 
Total Mississippi River ..... 
t 
Other Levees Indcluded in 
Mainstem Atchafalaya Basin 
Atchafalaya River and 
Bayou des Glaises .......... 
East Bank Atchafalaya River.. 
Bayou des Glaises .......... 
West bank Atchafalaya River.. 
Simmesport Ring ........... 
Melville Ring .............. 
Krotz Springs Ring ......... 
Mansura Hills to Hamburg ... 
West protection levee, Hamburg 
to Berwick drainage canal via 
Calumet ................. 
Levees west of Berwick, Berwick 
drainage canal to Charenton 
drainage canal ............ 
Morganza upper guide levee ... 
(27.2) 
(13.3) 
4.6 
8.6 
0.1 
(13.9) 
13.8 
0.1 
11.6 
37.4 
511.6 
(148.4) 
52.5 
7.9 
60.1 
1.6 
4.1 
1.7 
20.5 
128.7 
56.5 
8.9 
(27.2) (--) (23.2) 
(13.3) (-) (11.0) 
4.6 - 2.3 
8.6 - 8.6 
0.1 - 0.1 
(13.9) (-) (12.2) 
13.8 - 12.1 
0.1 - 0.1 
11.6 - 
(1.7) 
(--) 
(1.7) 
1.7 
(-) 
(-) 
(--) 
(--) 
(--) 
(--) 
(--) 
(--) 
(--) 
(--) 
11.6 
37.4 9.0 37.4 
511.6 32.5 440.6 
(148.4) (--) (143.9) 
52.5 - 52.5 
7.9 - 7.9 
60.1 - 55.6 
1.6 - 1.6 
4.1 - 4.1 
1.7 - 1.7 
20.5 - 20.5 
128.7 2.0 101.1 
56.5 
8.9 
(-) 
(--) 
(18.4) 
(4.6) 
- 4.6 
(--) (13.8) 
13.8 
- 11.6 
- 
37.1 
(--) 
- 
-
-w 
-w 
10.1 - 1.1 
(--) 
-w 
-M 
(-)
-Y 
(--) 
3.7 
-- 37.4 
- 479.6 
(--) (148.4) 
52.5 
7.9 
60.1 
1.6 
4.1 
1.7 
20.5 
- 128.7 
- 56.5 
- 8.9 
- 17.1 
- 8.9 
(--) (18.4) (-) 
(--) (4.6) (--) 
- 4.6 - 
(--) (13.8) (--) 
- 13.8 - 
- 11.6 - 
-- 37.4 - 
- 479.6 - 
(--) 
(148.4) 
(--) 
- 52.5 - 
- 7.9 - 
- 60.1 - 
- 1.6 - 
- 4.1 - 
- 1.7 - 
- 20.5 - 
- 128.4 - 
tJ 
- 56.5 
- 8.9 
ses
Currently 
Under 
Construction 
0 
-

TABLE 41-K 
(Continued) 
PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Levees and Floodwall Berm Staced Roads on v 
(Miles) (Mile) (Mile.) 
Built to 
APproved 
Total 
Total Cur- In Comn- Cur- In Cam- 
In Total rently System plete rently System plte 
Authorised Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thra 
for This This This Con- Corn- This This Con- Com. This This 
Location System F' FY FY struction pleted FY FY struetion pleted W FY 
East Protection levee, Morganza 
to Cutoff Bayou, including 
19.5 miles of Morganza lower 
guide levee................ 
Total Atchafalaya Basin ...... 
Total-Main Stem Leaves ....... 
TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN 
MR&T PROJECT 
Lake Pontchartrain, LA ........ 
Item A levees .............. 
S Item B levees.............. . 
Item C levees .............. 
Total Tributary Levees in MR&T 
Project.................... 
GRAND TOTAL .............. 
106.7 106.7 1.4 89.7 
449.2 449.2 3.4 360.7 
960.8 960.8 35.9 801.3 
(17.4) 
5.0 
10.1 
2.3 
17.4 
978.2 
(17.4) (--) (17.4) 
5.0 - 5.0 
10.1 - 10.1 
2.3 -- 2.3 
17.4 - 17.4 
978.2 35.9 818.7 
5.0 
8.7 
45.8 10.1 - 1.1 
-- 105.0 
- 447.5 
- 927.1 
- 868.0 
- 428.2 
- 907.8 
(-)
M
-ms 
(--) (--) (--) (--) (-) (17.4) 
- - - - - 5.0 
- - - - - 10.1 
- - -- -- - 2.3 
- - - - - 17.4 
45.8 10.1 - 1.1 - 944.5 
(17.4) 
5.0 
10.1 
2.3 
- 17.4 
- 925.2 
1. Figures indicate landside seepage berms only. 
2. Changed to correct previous error. 
e. 
Currently 
Under 
Construction 
-I (-) 
-
-
- 
-
-

TABLE 41-L PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
e. 
Currently 
Under 
Construction 
Levees and floodwalis Berm rod R on L 
(Miles) (Mile) (Mile) 
Built to 
Approved 
Grade and Total 
Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Comin 
Total rently System plete rently System plete 
Authorised Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru 
for This This This Con- Cornm- This This Con- Com- This This 
Location System FY FT FY2 struction pleted FY FY struction pleted F FY 
MAIN STEM LEVEES 
Mississippi River Levees 
East bank in Mississippi ...... 178.34 178.3 - 109.1 
Greenville Harbor dikes ...... 7.8 7.8 - 7.8 
West bank in Arkansas ....... 75.6 75.6 - 55.0 
West bank in Louisiana 
(above Red River) .......... 198.7 198.7 1.0 68.1 
Total Mississippi River 
Levees ................ 460.4 460.4 1.0 240.0 
156.9 
61.3 
4.6 
- 119.3 
- 54.3 
93.3 1.0 70.6 
4.6 311.5 1.0 244.2 
7.6 
-Y 
174.2 
2.7 
75.4 
2.3 197.8 
9.9 450.1 
- 174.2 - 
0 2.7 - 
- 75.4 - 
- 197.8 - 
0 450.1 - 
Other Levees Included in Main 
4 Stem 
~' Lower Red River-South Bank 
Red River levees ........... 
Hotwells to Moncla, LA, 
levees .................. 
Arkansas River, South Bank .. 
Total Other Levees Included in 
Main Stem .............. 
Total-Main Stem Levees .... 
TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN 
MR&T PROJECT 
Arkansas River, North bank .. 
Red River Backwater Levees .. 
(59.2) (59.2) (-) (59.2) (-) (-) (-) (--) (-) (59.2) (-) (59.2) (-) 
59.2 59.2 -- 59.2 - - - - - 59.2 - 59.2 - 
85.4 85.4 - 85.4 - 24.7 -- 24.7 - 84.1 - 81.1 - 
144.6 144.6 - 144.6 - 24.7 -- 24.7 - 143.3 - 140.3 
605.0 605.0 1.0 384.6 4.6 336.2 1.0 268.9 9.9 593.4 0 590.4 - 
_0 
61.5b 
263.6 
56.2 - 56.2 
192.1 - 178.4 
- 8.3 
9.8 - 
- 8.3 
- -w 
- 47.4 
- 249.0 
- 47.4 
- 153.6 
- I 
0.5 
0

TABLE 41-L 
(Continued) 
PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surhed Roads on v 
(Miles) (Mile) (Mile) 
Built to 
Approved 
Grade and Total 
Total Section Cur In Comrn- Cur- In Cornin 
Total rently System plete rently System plete 
Authorized Place Thra Under When Built Thr Under When Built Thru 
for This This This Con- Comrn- This This Con- Com- This This 
Location System F FT FT2 struction pleted FT FT struction plated F FT 
Yazoo River Basin ........... . (624.1) (425.3) (5.7) (235.5) (2.1) (-) (--) (--) (-) (624.1) (4.6) (338.9) 
Headwater................ 527.5 373.7 5.7 183.9 2.1 - - - - 527.5 4.6 299.9 
Backwater ................ 96.6 51.6 - 51.6 - - - - - 96.6 - 39.0 
Total Tributary Levees in 
MR&T Project ........... . 949.2 673.6 5.7 470.1 11.9 8.3 - 8.3 - 920.5 4.6 539.9 
GRAND TOTAL ............. . 1,554.2 1,278.6 6.7 854.7 16.5 344.5 1.0 277.2 9.9 1,513.9 4.6 1,130.3 
1. This tabulation does not include riverside berms which are considered an integral part of the levee section. Riverside berms will be constructed along with levee enlargements or seepa 
contracts. 
S2. Levee that has adequate freeboard based on the refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line for the Mississippi River. Levees with more than 2 feet of freeboard are considered adequate 
O 3. Subject to change as planning progresses. Does not include existing berms which need restudy. 
4. Includes 1.4 miles of concrete floodwall and 0.3 mile of levee on Vicksburg city front. 
5. Includes 5.3 miles for Gillett new levee. 
ge berm 
ees
Cur. 
Under 
Construoetlon 
(2.1) 
2.1 
2.6 
2.6 
2.6 
QI

TABLE 41-M PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
me.
Currently 
Under 
Construction 
Levees and Floodwalls Berm Srfaoed Roads on Lev 
(Mile.) (Miles) 
Built to 
Approved 
Grade and Total 
Total Section Cur- In Cornm- Cur- In Cornin 
Total rently System plete rently System plete 
Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thnru Under When Built Thru 
for This This This Con- Corn- This This Con- Com- This This 
Location System FT FT FT strution pleted! FT FTY struction pleted FY FY 
MAIN STEM LEVEES 
Mississippi River 
Mounds, IL ................ 
Mound City, IL ............. 
Cairo Drainage District ....... 
City of Cairo ............... 
Little River Drainage District .. 
Levee District No. 2, Scott 
County, MO ............. 
Levee District No. 3, Mississippi 
County, MO .............. 
S St. Johns Levee and Drainage 
District.................. 
a St. Francis Levee District 
of MO ................... 
City of Hickman, KY ......... 
Board of Levee Commissioners 
Fulton, County, KY ......... 
Reelfoot Levee District of Lake 
and Obion Counties, TN ..... 
Madrid Bend Levee District, 
Lake Co., TN .............. 
Lake County Levee and Drainage 
District .................. 
Dyer County Levee and Drainage 
District No. 1 ............. 
Tipton-Obion levee extension... 
St. Francis Levee District 
of AR .................... 
Helena Improvement District 
No. 1.................... 
Cotton Belt Levee District 
No. 1 .................... 
3.9 
2.7 
13.82 
6.2 
19.3 
13.8 
26.0 
59.03 
55.7 
1.4 
16.7 
3.9 
2.7 
13.8 
6.2 
19.3 
13.8 
26.0 
3.9 
2.7 
13.8 
6.2 
19.3 
0.5 
2.5 
1.6 
4.4 
9.7 
- 13.8 4.2 
- 26.0 12.9 
58.7 - 58.2 
55.7 
1.4 
16.7 
4.5 4.5 
5.2 5.2 
17.0 
21.3 
6.5 
156.7 
15.9 
21.3 
156.7 
- 55.7 - 
- 1.4 - 
- 16.7 
- 4.5 
- 5.2 
- 15.9 
- 21.3 
- 153.2 
- 153.2 
5.3 5.3 - 5.3 - 
0.5 
2.5 
2.0 
4.9 
3.6 
1.1 
8.5 
4.0 
19.3 
- - - 13.8 
- 4.9 
9.2 - - 
- 26.0 
- 46.9 
13.0 - 12.0 - 55.1 
- - - - 0.5 
15.1 - 11.4 
0.6 - 0.3 
- 16.3 
- 4.5 
- - - - 5.2 
9.6 3.0 9.4 0.2 17.0 
1.3 - 0.4 - 21.3 
- - - - 6.5 
88.4 - 83.2 5.2 156.7 
2.4 - 2.4 - 4.7 
23.9 - 23.9 
3.6 
1.1 
8.5 
3.5 
19.3 
- 13.8 
- 26.0 
- 46.1 
- 55.1 
- 16.3 
- 4.3 
- 5.2 
- 15.9 
- 21.3 
- 156.7 
--- 0
0 -I0 -I
w 
-I -
- 
- 
-
- 
- t 
-o 
- 4.2 - 
- 23.9 - 
IO 
0 
2 
23.9 19.4 - 19.4 - 23.9

TABLE 41-M 
(Continued) 
PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Levees and Floodwalls Berm Sured Roads on Lev 
Built to 
Approved 
Grade and Total 
Total Section Cur- In Com- Cur- In Comin 
ToTal rently System plete rangy System pate 
Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built r 
for This This This Con- Comrn- This This Con- Com- This This 
Location System FY FT FT struction pleted ! FT FY struction pleted F FT 
Laconia Drainage and Levee 
District Phillips County, AR .. 
Laconia Levee District No. 1 of 
Deshna County, AR ......... 
Laconia Circle Special Drainage 
District of Deshna 
County, AR ............... 
Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee 
District .................. 
Madrid Bend L.D., Fulton Co., 
KY ................... .. 
' Birds Point-New Madrid setback 
levee................... 
Total Mississippi River ..... 
TOTAL MAIN STEM LEVEES .. 
TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN 
MR&T PROJECT 
St. Francis River ............. 
East bank ................. 
West bank ................ 
Little River ................. 
East bank (left) ............. 
West bank................. 
Elk Chute ................. 
West Basin and middle valley .. 
Lower White River............ 
White River backwater levee ... 
Augusta to Clarendon ........ 
Clarendon levee ............. 
20.5 
18.1 
20.5 - 
18.1 - 
6.6 6.6 - 
93.6 93.6 - 
4.8 4.8 - 
35.3 
637.8 
637.8 
(308.2) 
159.5 
148.7 
(130.1) 
40.7 
35.1 
39.9 
14.4 
(95.6) 
40.2 
49.2 
6.2 
20.5 
18.1 - 
6.6 - 
93.6 
11.5 
12.6 
- 87.3 
- 11.5 20.5 
- 9.2 - 16.5 
- 87.3 
4.8 
35.3 - 35.3 
629.9 - 625.4 
629.9 - 625.4 
(302.9) - (302.9) 
156.2 - 156.2 
146.7 - 146.7 
(130.1) - (130.1) 
40.7 - 40.7 
35.1 - 35.1 
39.9 - 39.9 
14.4 - 14.4 
(85.9) - (84.1) 
40.2 - 40.2 
39.5 - 39.5 
6.2 - 4.4 
23.8 - - 
340.0 3.0 261.3 
340.0 3.0 261.3 
- 93.6 
- 4.8 
- 35.3 
5.4 605.6 
5.4 605.6 
- (301.0) 
- 156.7 
- 144.3 
- (128.9) 
- 40.7 
- 35.1 
- 39.7 
- 13.4 
- (88.0) 
- 38.8 
- 49.2 
20.5 
- 16.5 - 
- 93.6 - 
- 4.8 - 
- 35.3 - 1, 
- 595.5 - 
- 595.5 - 
- (133.5) - 
- 94.7 - 
- 38.8 - 0 
- (94.5) - E 
- 40.1 - 
- 23.7 - 
- 17.3 - 
- 13.4 - 
- (75.0) - 
- 38.8 - 
- 36.2 - 
ees
Carready 
Under 
Contruction

TABLE 41-M 
(Continued) 
PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Levee. and loodwalls Berm Sa ed Roads on Lev 
(Mile.) (Mile) (Miles) 
Built to 
Approved 
Grade and 
Section Total 
Total Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Cmin 
Total rently System plete rently System plet e 
Authorised Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru 
for Tis hiiss CoTihs ThCios m- Con- Com- This ThisCon- 
Location System FT F T FT struction pleted FT F T struction pleted/ F FT 
Memphis Harbor ............. 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 - 7.0 - 7.0 - 10.5 - 10.5 
Total Tributary Levees in 
MR&T Project................544.4 529.4 - 527.6 - 7.0 - 7.0 - 528.4 313.5 
GRAND TOTAL ................ 1,182.2 1,159.3 - 1,153.0 - 347.0 3.0 268.3 5.4 1,134.0 - 9090 
see, 
O0 
Currently 
Under / 
Con- Mi 
struction -O 
-1 
1. Subject to change as planning progresses. 
2. Includes 5.1 miles of Cache River levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 
3. Includes 12.1 miles of Farrenburg levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 
0
0a

TABLE 41-N RECAPITULATION 
PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
ees
Carrently 
Under 
Con 
struction 
Levees and Floodwalls BeSrm ed Roads on 
(Miles) (Mile.) 
Built to 
Appro ved 
Grade and Total 
Total Section Cuar- In Comrn- Cur- In Comin 
Total rently System plete rently System plot 
Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thr 
for This This This Con- Corn- This This Con- Corn- This This 
Location System FT FY F struction pleted F F stretion pleted FY 
MAIN STEM LEVEES 
Mississippi River 
New Orleans District, 
Table 41-K................ 511.6 511.6 32.5 440.6 
Vicksburg District, Table 41-L.. 460.4 460.4 1.0 240.0 
Memphis District, Table 41-M .. 637.8 629.9 - 625.4 
Total Mississippi River ...... 1,609.8 1,601.9 33.5 1,306.0 
37.1 
4.6 
41.7 
10.1 
311.5 
340.0 
661.6 
- 1.1 - 479.6 - 479.6 - 
1.0 244.2 9.9 450.1 - 450.1 - 
3.0 261.3 5.4 605.6 - 595.5 - 
4.0 506.6 15.3 1,535.3 - 1,525.2 - 
Other Levees Induded in Main 
Stem 
S Atchafalaya Basin Floodway- 
S NOD .................... 
S Lower Red River-South Bank- 
VXD .................... 
Arkansas River-South Bank- 
VXD ................... 
Total Other Levees Induded 
in Main Stem........... 
449.2 
59.2 
449.2 3.4 360.7 
59.2 - 59.2 
85.4 85.4 - 85.4 
593.8 593.8 3.4 505.3 
Total Main Stem Levees .... 2,203.6 2,195.7 36.9 1,811.3 
TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN 
MR&T PROJECT 
Lake Pontchartrain, LA,--NOD .. 
Yazoo River Basin-VXD ...... 
Arkansas River-North Bank- 
VXD ..................... 
Red River Backwater-VXD ..... 
St. Francis River-MD ......... 
Little River--MD ............. 
Lower White River-MD ....... 
17.4 
624.1 
61.5 
263.6 
308.2 
130.1 
95.6 
17.4 - 17.4 
425.3 5.7 235.3 
56.2 
192.1 
302.9 
130.1 
85.9 
- 56.2 
- 178.4 
- 302.9 
- 130.1 
- 84.1 
8.7 
- 24.7 
8.7 24.7 
50.4 
2.1 
9.8 
-w 
-w 
-- 24.7 
- 24.7 
686.3 4.0 531.3 
8.3 
-w 
-w 
-w 
- 447.5 
- 59.2 
- 84.1 
- 500.8 
15.3 2,126.1 
- 17.4 
- 624.1 
8.3 
-Y 
- 428.2 
- 59.2 
- 81.1 
- 568.5 
- 2,093.7 
- 17.4 
4.6 338.9 
47.4 
249.0 
301.0 
128.9 
88.0 
47.4 
153.6 
133.5 
94.5 
75.0 
1. Landside seepage berms only. 
2. Subject to change as planning progresses. 
- 
- 0 
2.1 
0.5

TABLE 41-N 
(Continued) 
RECAPITULATION 
PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Levees and Floodwalls Berm- urtaced Roads on v 
(Mile.) (Mile) (Miles) 
Built to 
Approved 
Grade and Total 
Total Section Cur- In Con- Cur- In Cornin 
Total rently System plete rently System plete 
Authorized Place Thra Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru 
for This This This Con- Corn- This This Con- Co- This This 
Location System FT FT FT struction pleted. FT FT struction pleted F FT 
Memphis Harbor-MD ......... 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 - 7.0 - 7.0 - 10.5 10.5 
Total Tributary Levees in 
MR&T Project ............ 1,511.0.220.4 5.7 1015.1 11.9 15.3 - 15.3 466 4.6 870.8 
Grand Total in Project ....... 3,714.6 3,416.1 42.6 2,826.4 62.3 701.6 4.0 546.6 15.3 3,592.4 4.6 2,964.5 
See' 
Cur. 
rently 
Under c 
Con- A 
struction 
2.6 
2.6 
1. Landside seepage berms only. 
2. Subject to change as planning progresses. 
0
0
aq

TABLE 41-O0 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: 
NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Total 
In Complete 
System Built Thru Currently 
Year When This This Percent Under 
Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction 
(Miles) 
Bayou des Glaises diversion channel .............. 1938 6.0 -- 6.0 100 -- 
Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie .............. 1946 92.6 -- 63.4 75 -- 
Charenton drainage and navigation canal .......... 1939 6.3 -- 6.3 100 -- 
Wax Lake Outlet .............................. 1938 15.7 -- 15.7 100 -- 
Atchafalaya Basin Floodway .................... 1933 244.2 -- 186.4 76 -- 
Morganza Floodway ........................... 1941 3.3 -- 3.3 100 -- 
Old River outflow channel ...................... 1956 8.3 -- 8.3 100 -- 
Old River inflow channel ........................ 1960 2.3 -- 2.3 100 -- 
Old River lock approach channels ................ 1961 2.2 -- 2.2 100 -- 
Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) .............. 1958 2.5 -- 2.5 100 -- 
Teche-Vermilion Water Supply .................. 1977 6.3 -- 6.3 100 -- 
Old River Auxiliary Control Structure inflow channel . 1986 1.9 -- 1.9 100 -- 
Old River Auxiliary Control Structure outflow channel 1988 0.9 -- 0.9 100 -- 
Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion channel .......... 1988 1.7 -- 1.7 100 -- 
41-71

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: 
VICKSBURG DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Total 
In Complete 
System Built Thru Currently 
Year When This This Percent Under 
Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction 
(Miles) 
BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, 
ETC., MS 
Big Sunflower River .......................... 1947 199.1 -- 199.1 100 -- 
Quiver River ................................. 1947 69.6 -- 69.6 100 -- 
Deer Creek .................................. 1947 7.0 -- 7.0 100 -- 
Steele Bayou ................................ 1947 54.9 -- 54.9 100 -- 
Steele Bayou 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 71.2 -- 68.5 97 2.7 
Main Canal ................................. 1959 21.1 -- 21.1 100 -- 
Main Canal2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 25.3 .-.-. ...-- -- -- 
Black Bayou ................................. 1992 36.5 -- 6.3 17 -- 
Big Sunflower River tributaries .................. .1957 227.2 -- 227.2 100 -- 
Quiver River tributaries ........................ 1960 35.4 -- 35.4 100 -- 
YAZOO BACKWATER 
Yazoo Backwater ............................. 1960 39.9 -- 39.9 100 -- 
YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS 
Upper Yazoo Project ........................... 1976 179.0 -- 55.7 28 11.3 
Coldwater River ............................. 1941 54.6 -- 54.6 100 -- 
Arkabutla Canal .............................. 1948 0.4 -- 0.4 100 -- 
Tallahatchie Canal ........................... 1940 74.8 -- 73.5 85 -- 
Little Tallahatchie River and 
Panola-Quitman Floodway..................... 1939 48.0 -- 48.0 100 -- 
Greenwood protection works ..................... 1971 2.9 -- 2.9 100 -- 
Yacona River ................................ 1952 1.8 -- 1.8 100 -- 
Bobo Bayou ................................. 1944 16.1 -- 16.1 100 -- 
Cassidy Bayou ............................... 1934 69.0 -- 69.0 100 -- 
Cassidy Bayou3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 26.0 -- -- -- .. 
Bear Creek Diversion ......................... - 4.8 -- -- -.. -- 
Lake Cormorant .............................. ..-- 20.9 -- -- -. -- 
Hurricane Bayou ............................. ..- 2.5 -- -- -- -- 
Opossum Bayou.............................. -- 20.8 -- -- -- -- 
Abaica Creek ................................ ..- 7.7 .. .. .. .. 
Chicopa Creek ............................... ..- 7.0 -- -- -- -- 
Bear Creek ................................. ..- 23.3 -- -- -- -- 
Rocky Bayou ................................ ..- 7.8 -- -- -- -- 
Whiteoak Bayou ............................. -- 55.9 -- -- -- -- 
Miscellaneous ditches ......................... -.. 12.3 -- -- -- -- 
Yalobusha River ............................. 1939 46.0 -- 46.0 100 -- 
Yazoo River ................................. 1940 160.2 -- 160.2 100 -- 
Whittington Auxiliary Channel .................. . 1956 30.8 -- 30.8 100 -- 
Tchula Lake ................................ 1964 26.4 -- 26.4 100 -- 
David-Burrell Bayou .......................... 1957 40.4 -- 40.4 100 -- 
McKinney Bayou ............................. 1960 3.5 -- 3.5 100 -- 
Hillside Floodway ............................. 1964 11.0 -- 11.0 100 -- 
Yazoo City protection works .................... . 1953 1.6 -- 1.6 100 -- 
Ascalmore-Tippo Bayous ....................... 1975 30.2 -- 15.1 50 -- 
41-72

TABLE 41-P 
(Continued) 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: 
VICKSBURG DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Total 
In Complete 
System Built Thru Currently 
Year When This This Percent Under 
Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction 
(Miles) 
YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS 
(Continued) 
Alligator-Catfish Bayou ......................... 1973 8.3 -- 8.2 99 -- 
Pelucia Creek ................................ 1975 11.5 -- 11.5 98 0.2 
BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, 
ETC., LA AND AR 
Bayou Lafourche .............................. 1949 45.3 -- 45.3 100 -- 
Bayou Lafourche4 '7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1972 43.0 -- 4.4 10 -- 
Big & Colewa Creeks .......................... 1947 81.4 -- 81.4 100 -- 
Big & Colewa Creeks5' 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 86.8 -- 51.5 60 -- 
Tensas River ................................. 1947 96.5 -- 96.5 100 -- 
Tensas River 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1968 165.0 -- 61.0 37 -- 
Boeuf River, AR and LA ........................ 1953 103.9 -- 103.9 100 -- 
Fleschmans Bayou, AR ......................... 1963 6.6 -- 6.6 100 -- 
Caney Bayou, AR ............................ 1964 7.4 -- 7.4 100 -- 
Canal 18, AR ................................ 1963 10.3 -- 10.3 100 -- 
Big Bayou, AR ............................... 1952 33.3 -- 33.3 100 -- 
Black Pond Slough, AR ......................... 1962 14.3 -- 14.3 100 -- 
Bayou Macon, AR and LA ...................... 1959 150.8 -- 150.8 100 -- 
Rush Bayou, AR ............................. 1964 6.7 -- 6.7 100 -- 
Canal 19, AR ................................ 1957 50.2 -- 50.2 100 -- 
Canal 43, AR ................................ 1956 34.5 -- 34.5 100 -- 
Canal 81, AR ................................ 1957 32.7 -- 32.7 100 -- 
Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal-Bayou 
Vidal Cutoff................................ - 17.1 -- -- -- -- 
KirschLake Canal............................ - 9.3 -- -- -- -- 
Canal 19 Extension ........................... 1964 9.4 -- 9.4 100 -- 
Lake Chicot Pumping Plant ..................... -- 2.5 -- 2.5 100 -- 
Mill Bayou .................................. 1955 4.8 -- 4.8 100 -- 
RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA 
Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant ................. . 1976 6.9 -- 6.9 100 -- 
Six Mile Bayou, LA ........................... -- 1.5 -- 1.5 100 -- 
GRAND PRAIRIE, AR ......................... - 338.1 -- -- -- --.. 
BAYOU METO, AR ........................... - 164.9 -- -- -- -- 
1. Includes further work on 54.9 miles and adds 16.3 miles of channel to the project. 
2. Includes further work on 21.1 miles and adds 1.1 miles of channel to the project. 
3. Includes further work on 26.0 miles. 
4. Includes further work on 38.6 miles and adds 4.4 miles of channel to the project. 
5. Includes further work on 75.3 miles and adds 11.5 miles of channel to the project. 
6. Includes further work on 96.5 miles and adds 68.5 additional miles of channel to the project. 
7. Further work on these items has been deferred due to local oppositions and withdrawal of sponsorship by 
the levee district. 
'8. Correction of previous error. 
41-73

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-Q CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: 
MEMPHIS DISTRICT 
(FISCAL YEAR 1995) 
Total 
In Complete 
System Built Thru Currently 
Year When This This Percent Under 
Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction 
(Miles) 
BIRDS POINT-NEW MADRID 
FLOODWAY 
Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting 
Ditch Enlargement, Samos and 
Vicinity, MO .............................. 
ST. FRANCIS BASIN 
Little River Drainage, MO ..................... 
St. Francis River, MO and AR ................... 
West Memphis Drainage, AR .................... 
Big Slough and Mayo Ditch, AR .................. 
Tyronza River, AR ........................... 
L'Anguille River, AR ......................... 
LOWER WHITE RIVER 
BASIN, AR 
Cache River Basin, AR ........................ 
Big Creek and tributaries, AR ................... 
WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES 
Obion Creek, KY ............................ 
WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES 
MS River, Western TN tributaries 
(Backwater Areas) (1946 Act) .................. 
Obion River Diversion Channel, 
TN (1946 Act) ............................. 
Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, KY and TN ............. 
Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN .................... 
MS River Below Cape Girardeau: West 
TN tributaries (1948 Act) ..................... 
Wolf River and tributaries, TN .................. 
NONCONNAH CREEK, MS AND TN 
Nonconnah Creek, MS and TN .................. 
HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS 
COUNTY, AR 
Helena Harbor, AR (2 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
1952 
1963 
1953 
1951 
1960 
1939 
(1) 
1972 
(1) 
(1) 
1952 
(1) 
1974 
1955 
1961 
1960 
1990 
1989 
9.6 
298.9 
638.5 
19.8 
28.0 
12.7 
95.0 
231.5 
103.8 
-- 9.6 
0
-N 
283.7 
538.9 
19.8 
28.0 
12.7 
-- 7.2 
--. --. 
100 
95 
84 
100 
100 
100
3 
41.7 
34.3 
9.3 
15.8 
19.7 
225.0 
25.5 
18.2 
2.2 
-- 34.3 
-- 3.0 
-- 19.7 
-- 89.8 
-- 25.5 
100 
19 
100 
41 
100 
-- 0.5 38 
1. Not started. 
2. Data for Stage 1 only. 
41-74 
8.9 
0.5

TABLE 41.R 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
PUMPING STATIONS: 
NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT 
Rehabilitation Status 
(I Applicable) 
Percent Percent 
Complete Year Complete Year 
Authorised Thru Complete Thru Complete 
Sise This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ 
Name (CL) FT Actual) Initiated FT Actual) 
Bayou Yokely 489 100 1955 1990 100 1991(A) 
Bayou Yokely Enlargement 568 100 1963 1990 100 1991(A) 
Centerville 332 100 1964 1991 100 1992(A) 
Ellerslie 136 100 1953 -- -- -- 
Franklin 144 100 1958 1992 100 1993(A) 
Franklin Enlargement 144 100 1978 1992 100 1993(A) 
Gordy 288 100 1964 - -- -- 
Maryland 136 100 1957 1991 100 1992(A) 
North Bend 52 100 1962 -- -- -- 
Tiger Island 75 100 1955 -- -- -- 
Wax Lake East 1,008 100 1961 1990 100 1992(A) 
Wax Lake West 496 100 1965 1990 100 1992(A) 
Teche Vermilion 1,300 100 1982 -- -- -- 
Point Coupee500 100 1983 -- -- -- 
TOTAL 6,618 
41-75

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-S PUMPING STATIONS: 
VICKSBURG DISTRICT 
Rehabilitation Status 
(If Applicable) 
Percent Percent 
Complete Year Complete Year 
Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete 
Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ 
Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) 
Chauvin Bayou, LA 250 99 1994 1991 100 
Bawcomville 270 100 1955 1992 100 1993(a) 
Jonesville 180 100 1952 -- -- -- 
Natchez Port 100 -- -- -- .. .. 
Wilson Point 50 - -- -- --.... 
Greenwood - Lee Street 90 100 1953 1952 --- 
Greenwood - Wilson Street 67 100 1953 1952 -- -- 
Greenwood - Walker Lake 675 100 1949 1952 -- -- 
Yazoo City 540 100 1954 1957 ---- 
Columbia 45 100 1939 -- -- -- 
Calion 200 100 1959 -- -- .. 
McKinney Bayou, MS 250 100 1962 1961 -- -- 
Lake Chicot 6,500 100 1987 -- -- -- 
Tensas Cocodrie 4,000 100 1986 -- -- -- 
Yazoo Backwater 10,000 -- -- -- .... 
Natchez Area 300 -- -- .. .. .. 
Bushley Bayou 300 -- Indef1 -- -- .. 
Bushley Bayou 20 -- Indef1 .. .. 
Sicily-HAHA Bayou 750 -- 2000( ) -- --.. 
Sicily - Fool River 300 -- 1997(s) -- -- .. 
Pelucia Creek - Rising Sun #1 10 100 1992 1991 ---- 
Pelucia Creek - Rising Sun #2 15 100 1992 1991 -- -- 
Pelucia Creek Pump 75 100 1993 1992 -- -- 
Below Red River 500 -- Indef1 -- 
Bayou Rapides2 222 100 1936 -- .... 
Total 25,709 
' This project has been placed in the inactive category. 
41-76

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
TABLE 41-T PUMPING STATIONS: 
MEMPHIS DISTRICT 
Rehabilitation Status 
(IApplicable) 
Percent Percent 
Complete Year Complete Year 
Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete 
Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ 
Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) 
Devall's Bluff 215 100 1949 1987 100 1989 
Des Arc, Ark. 30 100 1954 -- -- -- 
Ensley 900 100 1966 -- -- -- 
DD #17, Station #1 375 100 -- -- -- 
Huxtable Pumping Plant 12,000 100 1977 -- -- -- 
Graham Burke 1,500 100 1964 -- -- -- 
Finley Street 100 100 1978 -- -- -- 
Dyersburg 26 100 1961 -- -- -- 
Cotton Slough 50 100 1964 -- -- -- 
West Hickman 190 100 1976 -- -- -- 
Cypress Creek 3,000 100 1944 -- -- -- 
Fairfax 53.5 100 1950 -- -- -- 
Goose Pond 110 100 1976 -- -- -- 
Marble Bayou 220 100 1952 -- -- -- 
Workhouse Bayou 520 100 1950 -- -- -- 
Nonconnah 1,620 100 1944 -- -- -- 
L&DD #3 Peafield 400 100 1-- 
Treasure Island 150 100 1976 -- -- -- 
Lake No. 9 500 100 1981 -- -- -- 
Cairo 10th Street 65 100 1981 -- -- -- 
Cairo 28th Street 65 100 1981 -- -- -- 
DD #17, Station #2 700 100 1981 -- -- -- 
Drinkwater Sewer 150 100 1979 -- -- -- 
May Street 5 100 1948 -- -- -- 
Cairo 22nd Street 37 100 1 -- 
Gayoso Bayou 1,500 100 1915 -- -- -- 
Mud Lake 200 -- -- -- -- -- 
Madison 25 -- -- -- -- -- 
Cache River 200 -- -- -- -- -- 
New Madrid 1,500 -- -- -- -- 
St. John's Bayou L000-- -- -- --.. 
TOTAL 27,406.5 
1 Unknown constructed by local interest. 
41-77

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-U COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Item Construction Maintenance Other 
FEDERAL FUNDS 
Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries: 
St. Louis District: 
St. Francis Basin-Wappapello Lake $ -- $ 5,354,067 $ - 
Subtotal 5,354,067 
Memphis District: 
General investigations -- -- 4,029,883 
Mississippi River levees 4,216,425 7,161,482 -- 
St. Francis Basin 10,529,355 8,390,361 -- 
White River Backwater -- 1,846,570 -- 
Cache Basin, AR 199,399 -- -- 
Channel improvement 20,238,518 26,603,991 -- 
West Tennessee tributaries 1,813,192 -- -- 
Inspection of completed works -- 904,295 -- 
Mapping -- 591,642 -- 
LWR, Augusta to Clarendon -- --.... 
Reelfoot Lake No. 9, TN-K 1,000 -- -- 
Mud Lake, TN 861 -- -- 
Eight Mile Creek 55,102 -- -- 
Helena Harbor 831,100 2,903 -- 
L'Anguille River 693 -- -- 
Memphis Harbor Ensley Berm 603 -- -- 
Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS 184,278 -- -- 
Claredon Levee LWR, AR 61,822 -- -- 
Hickman Bluff, KY 82,699 -- -- 
West Memphis & Vincinity 1,124 -- .. 
Whiteman's Creek, AR 63,761 -- --.. 
West Kentucky tributaries 455 -- .. 
Horn Lake Creek & Tribs 206,430 -- -- 
Memphis Harbor (McKeller Lake) -- 288,971 -- 
Lake #9 Pumping Plant, KY -- 125,514 -- 
Subtotal 38,385,222 45,195,269 4,029,883 
Vicksburg District: 
General investigations -- -- 2,603,438 
Mississippi River levees 5,405,392 1,119,952 -- 
Lower Arkansas River -- 565,001 -- 
Tensas Basin 5,441,307 4,152,538 -- 
Yazoo Basin 52,492,844 29,365,537 -- 
Channel improvement 25,814,186 12,925,195 -- 
Mapping -- 254,238 -- 
Inspection of completed works -- 222,375 -- 
Lower Red River--South Bank Red River Levee -- 262,058 -- 
Dam Safety Assurances 5,428,757 -- -- 
Subtotal 94,582,486 48,866,889 2,603,438 
New Orleans District: 
General investigations -- -- 230,333 
Mississippi River levees 22,894,194 2,291,563 -- 
Mississippi Delta Region 4,298,541 132,193 -- 
Bonnet Carre Spillway -- 868,809 -- 
Old River -- 3,696,346 -- 
41-78

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
TABLE 41-U 
(Continued) 
COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Item Construction Maintenance Other 
New Orleans District (Continued): 
Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries 
Atchafalaya Basin 
Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System 
Channel improvement 
Mississippi & LA Estuarine 
B. R. Harbor Devil Swamp 
Inspection of completed works 
Mapping 
Subtotal 
Total Federal Funds 
CONTRIBUTED FUNDS 
Memphis District 
Reelfoot Lake TN & KY 
Dyer County Boat Ramp 
Helena Harbor Port Authority 
Vicksburg District 
Bank Protection 
New Orleans District: 
Old River 
Mississippi River Levees 
Mississippi Delta Region 
Total Contributed Funds 
Grand Total, Federal 
and Contributed Funds 
35,792,764 
14,529,572 
26,600,312 
603,072 
83,835 
12,347,929 
19,441,372 
177,442 
201,906 
365,480 
104,718,456 39,606,876 230,333 
237,686,164 139,023,101 6,863,654 
-- -- 204,007 
141,500 -- -- 
152,531 -- -- 
-- 79,591 -- 
6,000 -- -- 
1,519,691 -- -- 
1,819,722 79,591 204,007 
239,505,887 139,102,692 7,067,661 
41-79

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-V STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND 
ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD 
CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND 
TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, 
THROUGH SEP. 30, 1995 
Unexpended 
Accrued Balance 
District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1996 
ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES 
CHARGEABLE AGAINST FLOOD CONTROL 
ACT LIMITATIONS: 
COMPLETED WORKS: 
Waterways Experiment Station 
Office, Chief of Engineers 
Rock Island District: 
S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 
St. Louis District: 
S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 
Subtotal 
Memphis District: 
Des Arc, AR 
Contraction works 
DeValls Bluff, AR 
Mapping 
Memphis Harbor 
New Madrid Floodway 
Wolf River and tributaries 
Roads on levees (Mississippi River levees) 
S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 
Subtotal 
Vicksburg District: 
Boeuf Basin levees 
Channel realignment, Arkansas River 
Contraction works 
Eudora Floodway 
Vicksburg Harbor 
Greenville Harbor 
Grants Canal (Mississippi River levees) 
Mapping 
Jonesville, LA 
Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA 
Roads on levees 
S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 
Subtotal 
New Orleans District: 
Baton Rouge Harbor, LA 
Atchafalaya River and Basin, LA 
Bonnet Carre' Spillway, LA 
Contraction works 
Mapping 
$ 874,000 
19,158 
14,010 
16 n O) 
$ 874,000 
19,158 
14,010 
.LU~~U~ 1a ~-- 
1,076,520 1,076,520 -- 
178,925 178,925 -- 
8,692,791 8,692,791 -- 
231,215 231,215 -- 
1,450,337 1,450,337 -- 
18,736,432 18,736,432 -- 
6,521,543 6,521,543 -- 
1,723,620 1,723,620 -- 
12,426 12,426 -- 
1,998,766 1,998,766 -- 
39,546,054 39,546,054 -- 
2,764,605 2,764,605 -- 
125,074 125,074 -- 
1,972,183 1,972,183 -- 
826,235 826,235 -- 
4,664,515 4,664,515 -- 
2,864,516 2,864,516 -- 
7,070 7,070 -- 
1,531,021 1,531,021 -- 
172,950 172,950 -- 
3,980,000 3,980,000 -- 
105,660 105,660 -- 
2,350,201 2,350,201 -- 
57,184,031 57,184,031 -- 
699,185 
3,375,492 
14,212,198 
1,258,916 
1,112,967 
699,185 
3,375,492 
14,212,198 
1,258,916 
1,112,967 
41-80

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
TABLE 41-V 
(Continued) 
STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND 
ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD 
CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND 
TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, 
THROUGH SEP. 30, 1995 
Unexpended 
Accrued Balance 
District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 80, 1996 
New Orleans District: (Continued) 
Roads on levees 
S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 
Wax Lake Outlet and Charenton Canal 
Morganza Floodway and structure 
Lake Pontchartrain 
Teche Vermilion Basin Water Supply 
Old River 
Atchafalaya Basin, rights-of-way and flowage, 
Bayou des Glaises setback 
Subtotal 
All other completed items: 
Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 
Impounded savings 
Plant transferred to revolving fund 
OCE (portion of allotment transferred to 
revolving fund, Washington Dist.) 
Subtotal 
TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS 
UNCOMPLETED WORKS: 
Rock Island District: 
Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 
St. Louis District: 
Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 
Subtotal 
Memphis District: 
Mississippi River levees 
Mississippi River levees 
New Madrid 
Channel improvement: 
Revetments 
Dredging 
Dikes 
Reelfoot Lake 
Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9, TN-KY 
St. Francis Basin: 
Wappapello Lake 
St. Francis River and tributaries 
Big Slough and Mayo ditch 
Little River drainage 
540,838 
2,701,566 
10,098,817 
35,992,117 
5,513,110 
34,506,000 
292,274,000 
540,838 
2,701,566 
10,098,817 
35,992,117 
5,513,110 
84,506,000 
292,274,000 
402,673,123 402,673,123 -- 
4,995,215 4,995,215 -- 
1,593,097 1,593,097 -- 
24,924,578 24,924,578 -- 
19,882 19,882 -- 
31,532,772 31,532,772 -- 
532,012,500 532,012,500 -- 
579,462 579,462 -- 
1,897,980 1,897,980 -- 
92477442 29.9A444472A -- 
v, " , z-T 
194,292,354 
98,000 
406,745,306 
58,566,439 
209,635,963 
439,434 
7,895,000 
9,019,908 
272,703,182 
965,429 
52,447,092 
a, �, 68- 
194,272,971 
98,000 
406,726,000 
58,566,439 
209,134,933 
439,434 
7,895,000 
9,019,908 
272,693,068 
965,429 
52,445,711 
19,383 
501,030 
10,114 
1,381 
41-81 
r ni n eon ni n

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-V 
(Continued) 
STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND 
ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD 
CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND 
TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, 
THROUGH SEP. 30, 1995 
Unexpended 
Accrued Balance 
District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 80, 1996 
Lower White River: 
Clarendon Levee 
Augusta to Clarendon, AR 
White River backwater levee, AR 
Horn Lake Creek & Tribs 
Hickman Bluff, KY 
Memphis Harbor Ensley Berm 
Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS 
West Memphis and Vicinity 
Whiteman's Creek, Ar 
Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 
West Tennessee tributaries 
Helena Harbor 
Cache Basin, AR 
West Kentucky tributaries 
Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN 
L'Anguille River 
Eight Mile Creek 
Subtotal 
Vicksburg District: 
Mississippi River levees (excludes Grants Canal, 
$7,070, shown under completed works) 
Section 6 Levees 
Lower Arkansas River: 
North Bank 
South Bank 
Tensas Basin: 
Lake Chicot pumping plant 
Tensas River 
Red River Backwater: 
Below Red River 
Red River backwater levee, LA 
Tensas Cocodrie pumping plant 
Lower Red River South Bank Red River Levees 
Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA 
Channel improvement: 
Revetments 
Dredging 
Dikes 
Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 
Ouachita River Levees 
Yazoo Basin: 
Sardis Lake 
Enid Lake 
Arkabutla Lake 
Grenada Lake 
Greenwood 
Belzoni 
570,715 
1,788,846 
10,624,501 
994,000 
97,000 
3,510,000 
7,488,000 
571,000 
74,000 
108,651 
46,437,900 
15,075,000 
10,791,000 
1,440,000 
100,000 
196,000 
2,064,000 
1,314,735,720 
226,119,990 
9,000 
7,049,414 
15,676,286 
95,639,986 
41,505,235 
639,400 
80,199,425 
56,065,900 
756,300 
39,800,000 
476,573,078 
23,919,569 
155,806,718 
958,175 
400,000 
26,502,400 
21,292,400 
16,000,700 
45,401,494 
11,543,000 
316,656 
567,525 
1,788,846 
10,624,501 
980,175 
82,699 
3,510,000 
7,486,134 
570,664 
63,761 
108,651 
46,433,336 
15,071,620 
10,774,615 
1,440,000 
100,000 
191,307 
2,054,926 
1,314,107,356 
225,974,957 
9,000 
7,049,414 
15,676,286 
95,639,945 
41,505,235 
639,400 
79,975,636 
56,064,142 
756,300 
39,800,000 
476,108,351 
23,919,517 
155,431,596 
958,175 
400,000 
26,502,400 
21,292,400 
16,000,700 
45,401,494 
11,543,000 
316,656 
41-82 
3,190 
13,825 
14,302 
1,866 
336 
10,239 
4,564 
3,380 
16,385
0
0 
9,074 
628,364 
145,033 
41 
223,788 
1,758 
-- 
464,727 
53 
375,123

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
TABLE 41-V 
(Continued) 
STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND 
ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD 
CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND 
TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, 
THROUGH SEP. 30, 1995 
Unexpended 
Accrued Balance 
District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1995 
Yazoo Basin: (Continued) 
Yazoo City 
Will M. Whittington auxiliary channel 
Big Sunflower, etc. 
Main Stem 
Upper Yazoo Projects 
Yazoo Basin-Tributaries 
Tributaries (Except Ascal-Tippo-Opossum Bayous) 
Tributaries--Bank Stabilization 
Ascalmore-Tippo-Opossum Bayous 
Yazoo Basin Backwater 
Yazoo Backwater 
Rocky Bayou 
Yazoo Backwater Pumping Plant 
Muddy Bayou 
Yazoo Backwater, F&WL Mitigation 
Yazoo Basin Reevaluation 
Streambank Erosion Control, Eval. and Demo. 
Demonstration Erosion Control 
Dam Safety Assurances-Sardis Dam 
2,205,611 
10,950,966 
70,459,000 
34,472,300 
100,496,036 
103,322,166 
612,484 
23,977,200 
56,813,900 
3,401,500 
9,064,850 
5,145,200 
5,573,200 
18,300,170 
14,767,000 
172,831,900 
23,020,000 
2,205,611 
10,950,966 
70,221,252 
34,472,153 
100,263,955 
103,304,879 
612,484 
23,977,200 
56,813,250 
3,401,498 
9,064,850 
5,145,200 
5,566,057 
18,195,190 
14,767,000 
172,029,021 
22,988,582 
237,748 
147 
232,080 
17,287 
-- 
650
2 
-- 
7,143 
104,981 
802,879 
31,418 
Subtotal 
New Orleans District: 
Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries 
Miss. & LA Estuarine 
Channel Improvement: 
Dredging 
Revetments 
Lower Red River (South Bank Levees) 
Levees Under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 
Mississippi River Levees 
Mississippi Delta Region 
Atchafalaya Basin Floodway: 
Atchafalaya Basin 
Atchafalaya River Navigation 
Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System 
1,997,788,610 
5,008,008 
3,071,000 
35,945,266 
983,630,117 
18,056,600 
200,680 
324,505,000 
30,633,520 
759,538,537 
303,463 
42,928,000 
1,955,143,750 
5,008,008 
2,923,336 
35,945,266 
983,395,274 
18,056,600 
200,680 
324,297,080 
30,158,332 
759,344,134 
303,463 
42,693,600 
Subtotal 
TOTAL UNCOMPLETED WORKS 
2,203,820,191 2,202,325,773 1,494,418 
5,478,821,962 5,474,054,321 
ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 
(CONSTRUCTION) 
Memphis District: 
L'Anguille River Basin, AR 
Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9 
Cache River 
Big Creek and Tributaries, Lower White River 
2,644,860 
147,664 
-r 
234,842 
207,920 
475,188 
194,403 
234,400 
4,767,642 
150,000 
30,000 
420,000 
365,000 
150,000 
30,000 
420,000 
365,000 
41-83

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41.V 
(Continued) 
STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND 
ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD 
CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND 
TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, 
THROUGH SEP. 30, 1995 
Unexpended 
Accrued Balance 
District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 80, 1995 
Memphis District: (Continued) 
Clarendon Levee, Lower White River 
West Kentucky Tributaries 
Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN 
Harris Fork Creek, KY & TN 
Subtotal 
Vicksburg District: 
Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River, Steele Bayou 
Tensas - National Wildlife Refuge, LA 
Subtotal 
New Orleans District: 
Mississippi Delta Region (EP 309) 
Teche Vermilion Basin-Water Supply 
East Rapides & S. Central Avoyelles Parishes 
Subtotal 
TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING 
AND DESIGN 
TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS, UNCOMPLETED 
WORKS AND ADVANCE ENGINEERING 
AND DESIGN 
RECREATION FACILITIES--COMPLETED 
PROJECTS 
Eight-Year Project Funds 
St. Louis District: 
Wappapello Lake, MO 
Wappapello Lake, MO, Rockwood Landing 
Subtotal 
Vicksburg District: 
Sardis Lake 
Enid Lake 
Arkabutla Lake 
Grenada Lake 
Subtotal 
Total Eight-Year Program Funds 
Total chargeable against Flood Control 
Act Limitations excluding flood 
control emergencies 
Total maintenance since Jul. 17, 1941 
65,000 
175,000 
350,000 
540,000 
65,000 
175,000 
350,000 
540,000 
2,095,000 2,095,000 -- 
29,700 29,700 -- 
200,000 200,000 -- 
229,700 229,700 -- 
69,753 69,753 -- 
1,109,000 1,109,000 -- 
965,247 965,247 -- 
2,144,000 2,144,000 -- 
4,468,700 4,468,700 - 
6,015,303,162 6,010,535,520 4,767,642 
2,405,300 2,405,300 -- 
203,286 203,286 -- 
2,608,586 2,608,586 -- 
1,584,339 1,584,339 -- 
2,268,209 2,268,209 -- 
2,189,280 2,189,280 -- 
1,631,281 1,631,281 -- 
7,673,109 
10,281,695 
6,025,584,857 
2,713,274,855 
7,673,109 
10,281,695 
6,020,817,215 
2,712,053,501 
4,767,642 
1,221,354 
41-84

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
TABLE 41-V 
(Continued) 
STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND 
ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD 
CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND 
TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, 
THROUGH SEP. 30, 1995 
Unexpended 
Amnored Balance 
District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 80, 1995 
Total rehabilitation 81,118,000 31,113,000 -- 
Total flood control emergencies 14,900,300 14,900,800 -- 
Total general investigations 100,524,381 100,296,549 227,833 
Total flood control, MR&T appropriations 8,885,397,393 8,879,180,565 6,216,829 
Appropriations in addition to flood control, MR&T 
Other appropriations itemized in footnote (1), 
pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953 32,068,909 32,068,909 -- 
Grand total appropriated to Sep. 30, 1995 8,917,466,302 8,911,249,473 6,216,829 
Note: Preauthorization study costs chargeable to the MR&T authorization have been transferred to completed 
work. Costs not chargeable have been excluded from this report. 
41-85

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-W COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
Total 
Project Funding FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 96 Sep. 30, 1996 
Mississippi River General investigations: 
and tributaries Allotted 3,774,000 3,704,000 5,959,000 5,828,000 100,524,381 
(Regular Funds)1 Cost 3,642,732 3,850,132 5,652,422 6,863,654 100,296,549 
Construction (includes 
advance engineering 
and design): 
Allotted 217,256,000 216,540,520 210,458,000 190,229,000 5,845,401,962 
Cost 236,938,418 187,423,226 222,501,957 237,686,164 5,840,634,320 
Maintenance 
Allotted 132,439,000 134,142,000 132,458,000 131,195,000 2,713,274,855 
Cost 131,656,191 119,066,374 147,192,455 139,023,101 2,712,053,501 
Rehabilitations 
Allotted -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 
Cost -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 
Flood control 
emergencies 
(Maintenance): 
Allotted -- -- -- -- 14,885,992 
Cost -- -- -- -- 14,885,992 
(Contributed Funds) New Work: 
Contributed 420,000 2,398,000 2,068,480 1,982,766 24,076,926 
Cost 246,037 883,264 3,035,538 1,819,722 22,983,320 
Maintenance 
Contributed -- 54,773 253,538 35,699 3,031,837 
Cost 171,638 77,833 233,532 79,591 3,014,947 
1. Appropriations were as follows: 
Appropriations chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: 
Flood Control, MR&T except for emergencies (excludes Maintenance 
allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1995): 
Net total allotted for works under Mississippi River Commission: 
Eight-Year Program Funds, Construction General: 
Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): 
Transferred to revolving fund: 
Impounded savings: 
Flood control emergencies: 
Net total allotted: 
Impounded savings: 
Additional funds not chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: 
Appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T, except for flood control emergencies: 
General investigations: 
Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1995 
Appropriations in addition to appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T 
(itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953): 
Budgetary and OCE Reserves: 
Grand total: 
$6,014,883,390 
10,281,695 
4,995,215 
24,944,460 
1,593,097 
14,885,922 
14,378 
100,524,381 
2,713,274,855 
$6,056,697,857 
14,900,300 
2,813,799,236 
32,068,909 
8,917,466,302 
41-86

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
TABLE 41-W 
(Continued) 
COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 
Total 
Project Funding FY 95 Sep. 80,1995 
Reconciliation of appropriations and allotments: 
Total allotted to Sep. 30, 1995 
Transferred to revolving fund: 
Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): 
Impounded savings withdrawn by Chief of Engineers: 
8,885,919,152 
24,944,460 
4,995,215 
1,607,475 
Total Appropriations to Sep. 30, 1995: 8,917,466,302 
Appropriations for past four reporting periods were as follows: 
FY 92: $353,469,000 FY 94: $348,875,000 
FY 93: $354,386,520 FY 95: $327,252,000 
2. Totals for General Investigations include four projects transferred from Construction totals per DAEN-CWB-W, Aug. 4, 
1978, teletype. 
41-87

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
TABLE 41-X MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES 
ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
(96X3112) 
Federal Cost Totals by 
Item and CWIS Number FY 95 Categories 
SURVEYS (Category 100) 
Flood Damage Prevention (112) 
New Orleans District 
Morganza, LA to the Gulf of Mexico-12825 $ 230,333 
Vicksburg District 
Mississippi Delta, MS-12803 2,402,414 
Memphis District 
Jackson & Trenton, TN - 12874 -$3,403 
Reelfoot Lake, TN - 12394 265,364 
St. Francis River Below Wappapello (Whiteman's Creek)-22000 426 
St. Francis River F&WL, AR & MO-79690 423 
Subtotal 269,616 
TOTAL (Category 110) $2,902,363 
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 120) 
Vicksburg District 201,024 
Memphis District 108,501 
TOTAL (Category 120) 309,525 
CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 140) 
Flood Control Projects (141) 
Memphis District 
Eastern Arkansas Regional- 
Comprehensive Study - 81266 $2,861,120 
TOTAL (Category 140) 2,861,120 
41-88

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 
TABLE 41-X 
(Continued) 
MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES 
ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 
(96X38112) 
Federal Cost Totals by 
Item and CWIS Number FY 96 Categories 
PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & DESIGN (Category 160) 
Flood Control Projects (162) 
Memphis District 
Helena AR & Vicinity-81280 16,801 
Lower White River Big Creek & Trib-12472 296,068 
St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid Fdwy-77005 5,577 
Whiteman's Creek, AR-1273832,789 
TOTAL (Category 160) 351,235 
GRAND TOTAL MR&T GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 6,424,243 
41-89

U.S. Army Construction Engineering 
Research Laboratories 
RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES 
Background 
The U. S. Army Construction Engineering Research 
Laboratories (USACERL) serves the Corps, the 
Army and the Nation with technical accomplishments in 
many areas dealing with the facility infrastructure and 
environmental quality problems that Army installations 
encounter. Today's Army faces huge challenges in 
providing sustainable Civil Works structures. 
At USACERL, we explore innovative ways to 
construct cost-effective, modern structures which can be 
built, operated and maintained with increased ease and 
reduced cost. The mission at USACERL is primarily of 
a military construction and maintenance nature; however, 
many technologies have dual application and are 
of extreme value in the Civil Works arena. Our Civil 
Works efforts historically have been in the areas of 
corrosion control, engineered management systems, 
ceramic coatings technologies, high performance paints, 
removal of lead based paints, structure evaluation 
procedures, and environmental sustainment. 
USACERL has a superb Federal staff working in a 
variety of partnerships with academia and industry. A 
critical relationship is our alliance with the University of 
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). UIUC is an 
internationally recognized institution for engineering 
excellence. The partnership between USACERL and 
the University is a resource multiplier that has paid the 
Army, the Department of Defense, and the Nation 
dividends beyond expectations. 
USACERL's people, their expertise, and the ability 
to draw upon niiltiple sources of talent have all fostered 
a climate in which research flourishes and success 
builds on success. USACERL's spirited professionals 
take great pride in contributing to the welfare of the 
Army and America. 
Special support centers outside and within USACERL 
help Army and other customers use the products 
developed by USACERL researchers. In-House 
Centers include: (1) Welding Technology Center, POC: 
Mr. Robert Weber, (2) Spatial Planning and Management 
Center, POC: Mr. Bill Aley, (3) Paint Technology 
Center, POC: Mr Alfred Beitelman, (4) Tri-Services 
Cultural Resources Research Center, POC: Dr. John 
Isaacson, (5) Geographic Resources Analysis Support 
System Center, POC: Ms. Brenda Waller, and (6) 
Robotics Center, POC: Dr. Simon Kim. These in-house 
people can all be reached by calling our 800 number 
800-USA-CERL. Out-of-House Centers include: (1) 
Geographic Information System (GIS) Laboratory, 
POC: GIS Lab, University of Illinois, 220 Davenport 
Hall, 607 S. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801, 217- 
244-1222, (2) Micro PAVER, ROOFER, and RAILER 
Support Centers, POC: PAVER - Dr. Mo Shahin, 
ROOFER - Mr. David Bailey, and RAILER - Dr. Don 
Uzarski, who can all be reached at 800-USA-CERL, (3) 
Environmental Technical Information System (ETIS) 
Support Center, POC: ETIS Support Center, 909 W. 
Nevada, Urbana, IL 61801, 217-333-1369, (4) Building 
Loads Analysis and System Thermodynamics (BLAST) 
Support Office, POC: BLAST Support Office, 140 
Mechanical Engineering Bldg., 1206 W. Green St., 
Urbana, IL 61801, 217-333-3977, and (5) Construction 
Automation Support Center, which supports automating 
work at Corps of Engineers construction field offices, 
including the fielded version of the Resident Management 
System (RMS), POC: CASC, 1408 W. University 
Ave., Urbana, IL 61801 217-367-0137. 
EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 
USACERL has several million dollars' worth of 
test and evaluation equipment. A scanning electron 
microscope at USACERL has 50 Angstroms resolution 
(400,000 times magnification) enabling research at the 
subparticle level. The Triaxial Shock Test Machine or 
"Shake Table" can simulate many vibrational environmets, 
including earthquakes, and is the most powerful 
shaking table in the U.S. The heating, ventilating, and 
air-conditioning test facility supports energy research. 
Our ion plater is a state-of-the-art physical vapor 
deposition capability that can also check the quality of 
shielded materials. Other equipment includes that 
supporting the welding lab, acoustics lab, integrated 
simulation language lab, water quality lab, semiconductor 
fabrication system, plasma energy research lab, 
laser research facility and bioengineering research lab. 
USACERL also has access to the excellent research 
facilities at UIUC, including those at the Hazardous and 
Toxic Waste Laboratory, the National Center for 
Supercomputing Applications, and many capabilities 
within the College of Engineering. 
Civil Works R&D PROGRAMS 
Lead-Based Paint: Activities at the USACERL 
Paint Technology Center 
This work yields methods of lead paint detection 
and management that are safe, effective, and reasonable 
in cost. USACERL is looking at new technologies for 
the abatement of lead-based paint on building and the 
safe removal of lead paint from steel structures. 
VOC Compliant Coatings for Dams 
Vinyl paints have been used for many years on 
42-1

Corps dams. They provide excellent protection in the 
highly abrasive waters common at dam sites. Unfortunately, 
they contain large amounts of solvents which 
add to air pollution concerns. Work is underway to 
evaluate commercially available products that meet the 
stringent air pollution regulations and can withstand the 
high level of abrasion. 
Coatings for Application to Damp and Wet Surfaces
The Corps has many steel structures which are 
inside dams, underground or underwater. The interiors 
of these structures must be painted to protect from 
corrosion, however, the surfaces are always damp from 
condensation and floor areas frequently have flowing 
water. Typical paints will not adhere to these surfaces. 
A number of coatings that could be applied to these 
surfaces have been evaluated and several that provided 
excellent protection were discovered. Use of these 
coatings will eliminate the need for expensive dehumidification 
equipment during painting operations and will 
extend the life the structures. 
REMR Management Systems for Civil Works 
Structures 
USACERL is currently developing Repair, 
Evaluation, Maintenance, and Rehabilitation (REMR) 
Management Systems for numerous types of Civil 
Works structures owned by the Corps. REMR Management 
Systems are designed to be decision-support 
tools for determining when, where, and how to effectively 
allocate M&R dollars for Civil Works structures. 
These systems are being developed to provide: (1) 
objective condition assessment procedures, (2) means 
for comparing the condition of facilities and tracking 
change in condition over time, and (3) procedures for 
life-cycle cost analysis of different maintenance policies 
and rehabilitation alternatives. The primary objective of 
the REMR Management Systems is to help managers 
and engineers obtain the best facility condition for a 
given budget level. 
The deliverable(s) associated with a REMR 
Management System consists of (a) an objective methodology 
for performing condition rating inspections; (b) 
an algorithm for computing a condition index from 
inspection data; (c) software for managing and analyzing 
condition index data; (d) training of USACE personnel 
in use of the system. Systems that have been completed 
are listed below: 
REMR Management Systems Completed by 1995: 
Lock Miter Gates 
Lock Sector Lock Gate 
Concrete Lockwall Monoliths 
Steel Sheet Pile Structures 
Hydropower Equipment & Facilities (Condition 
42-2 
Index Only) 
Riverine Timber Training Dikes 
Lock Filling & Emptying Valves 
Lock and Dam Tainter Gates 
Lock and Dam Concrete Retaining Structure 
Lock and Dam Concrete Dams and Reservoir Dams 
Dam Roller Gates 
Cathodic Protection (CP) Diagnostic 
Buried and submerged metallic structures such as 
underground fuel storage tanks, underground utility 
piping, and civil works structures such as miter and 
sector gates are subject to corrosion damage. Corrosion 
is controlled on many of these structures by cathodic 
protection (CP). CP systems must be routinely evaluated 
to ensure that they continue to provide the 
appropriate level of protection. USACERL has 
developed the CP Diagnostic computer program to assist 
installations in evaluating, troubleshooting, and maintaining 
data on all cathodically protected structures. 
The program flags areas where the CP system is malfunctioning. 
An updated version of the program allows 
users to schedule CP system inspections according to 
regulatory and/or user-specified criteria. CP Diagnostic 
operates on a 80386-based or higher IBM-compatible 
microcomputer. 
Water Hammer and Mass Oscillation (WHAMO) 
Fluid distribution systems and hydropower plants 
can be severely damaged by water hammer, which is the 
forceful slam, bang, or shudder that occurs in pipes 
when a sudden change in fluid velocity creates a large 
change in fluid pressure. It can be mitigated by designing 
and operating these systems such that unfavorable 
changes in water velocity are minimized. The Water 
Hammer and Mass Oscillation (WHAMO) program 
assists in doing this by calculating the time-varying flow 
and head in networks comprised of pipes, valves, 
pumps, tanks, and turbo machines. WHAMO can 
analyze a wide variety of networks and scenarios. 
USACERL has made several user-requested modifications 
to WHAMO, including bringing it into the Windows 
environmet and developing a very flexible, easyto-
use graphics package to display program output. 
WHAMO sinmdations allow accurate calculations of the 
expected forces and stresses at various points in the 
system so that appropriate materials and sizes can be 
chosen. WHAMO also allows the engineer to diagnose 
and fix operating problems in existing systems. The 
Corps Hydroelectric Design Center recently used the 
updated version of WHAMO to analyze the Chicago 
Underlow Plan (CUP), which is a massive storm water 
and sewage storage system. Previous microcomputerbased 
versions of the program were unable to run the 
complex models required by this project due to memory 
limitations.

Coatings to Repel Zebra Mussels 
The zebra mussel is not native to U.S. waters, but 
was believed to be introduced into this country by 
European freighters in 1986. Since then, this organism 
has progressively infested waters from the Hudson Bay 
to the Great Lakes, west of the Mississippi River, and 
as far south as the Gulf of Mexico. Zebra mussels 
adhere to surfaces coming into contact with infested 
waters, which causes severe fouling. USACERL is 
evaluating different coating systems that could repel 
zebra mussels and prevent this fouling. This work is in 
cooperation with the U.S. Army Waterways Experiment 
Station, which is the lead Army laboratory for zebra 
mussel research. These coatings are being evaluated for 
potential in either being toxic to the mussel or providing 
a low-tension, nonadherent surface. 
System to Manage Current Year Operating Budget 
This project is developing a method that allows 
Districts and Divisions to respond to HQUSACE 
directives in time to enhance the budget approval 
process. The goal is to provide HQUSACE with a reengineered 
method for distributing funding allocation 
information, while providing Districts and Divisions 
with a more efficient system for responding, which 
greatly improves the Reclama process. Less time spent 
on the manual preparation of documentation allows 
more time for gathering and analysis to provide the most 
up-to-date information possible. Reviewers from Civil 
Works Districts and Divisions will no longer have to be 
detailed to HQUSACE for this task, resulting in savings 
in TDY, training and manpower costs. This project is 
currently in the technology transfer and implementation 
phase with HQUSACE and all Civil Works Districts 
and Divisions. 
Improved Specification For 
Hydraulic Cylinder Piston Rods 
The Corps of Engineers uses hydraulic pistons on 
Civil Works facilities. Ceramic-coated piston rods 
which improve performance and durability are now 
commercially available from a variety of manufacturers. 
CERL is currently evaluating the characteristics of 
ceramic-coated pistons rods necessary for long term 
performance on hydroelectric power turbine applications 
at Civil Works facilities. This knowledge will be used to 
develop an improved specification for these components. 
Non-Lubricating (Greaseless) Bushing for Hydroelectric 
Applications 
The Corps of Engineers has traditionally used 
grease lubricated bushings between parts having relative 
nation, so that special precautions and procedures are 
needed for handling and disposal. Recently, many types 
of greaseless bushings have been developed by the 
industry for a variety of applications. These systems 
have the obvious advantage of avoiding the problems 
associated with greases and show promise for application 
at Corps facilities. To ensure their performance on 
Civil Works facilities, CERL is evaluating these systems. 
Important test characteristics for long term system 
operation and initial parameters have been identified. 
"The Corps of Engineers Greaseless Bushing Test 
Procedure" was developed and greaseless bushing systems 
have been tested. This test procedure is currently 
the industrial benchmark for bushing systems. 
USACERL INFORMATION 
For information on these items or any other 
USACERL capabilities, call the Plans and Programs Office, 
CECER-PP-P, 217-373-7228, Mr. David Moody 
or 217-373-7290, Mr. Marvin Marlatt. Both can be 
reached toll-free at 800-USA-CERL or by FAX at 217- 
373-7222. 
motion at Civil Works facilities. These systems have 
given reliable performance over long periods of time. 
However, grease poses environmental and operating 
problems. It has a potential for environmental contami- 
42-3

U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH 
AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY 
BACKGROUND 
The U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and 
Engineering Laboratory (CRREL), in Hanover, New 
Hampshire, maintains the finest research and 
engineering staff and facilities in the world for the 
study of cold regions science and technology. 
CRREL's experience spans 50 years, starting with 
the Boston District's Soils Laboratory work on 
frozen soils in the early 1940s. The creation of 
CRREL began in 1961 with the merger of the Arctic 
Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory 
(ACFEL) and the Snow, Ice, and Permafrost 
Research Establishment (SIPRE), both of which 
were outgrowths of the Army's World War II 
experience in Alaska, Iceland, and Greenland. This 
merger put the Nation's and the DoD's principal 
cold regions expertise in one place. 
The early 1970's were the beginnings of a 
long-term program headed by the Corps of 
Engineers to investigate ways of extending 
navigation on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway 
throughout the winter, and also the beginnings of 
Civil Works research at CRREL. As part of this 
Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Winter 
Navigation Demonstration Program which began in 
1971, CRREL researchers investigated ice booms to 
impede the flow of ice into navigation channels, and 
later developed various methods of keeping 
waterway locks ice-free, including the use of 
chemical coatings, saws for cutting ice from lock 
walls, and bubblers for preventing ice formation. 
CIVIL WORKS RESEARCH FACILITIES 
CRREL's Ice Engineering Facility is one of 
the largest refrigerated hydraulics laboratories in the 
world. It contains a research area for large-scale 
refrigerated hydraulic models, a refrigerated flume, 
and a wind tunnel for simulating drifting snow; it 
also includes the only active low-temperature, ice 
towing tank in the United States. It serves the civil 
works needs of the Corps, the Navy's needs for 
testing the ice capability of its surface and 
submarine hulls, and, when necessary, provides 
support to private industry. 
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) 
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information 
Systems (RS/GIS) Center is located at CRREL. The 
Center provides a focus for assisting the COE 
District offices in exploiting the rapidly expanding 
capabilities of RS and GIS technologies in the 
execution of their water and natural resources and 
environmental missions. 
CIVIL WORKS RESEARCH PROGRAMS 
Major Civil Works Research Programs at 
CRREL include: Ice Engineering, River Confluence 
Ice, Remote Sensing, Oil Spill, Water Resources of 
Cold Regions, and Construction Productivity 
Advancement Research. The following is a 
summary of each program and a list of 
accomplishments for FY95. 
Ice Engineering Research Program 
The Ice Engineering Research Program 
develops the Nation's principal guidance for winter 
navigation, river ice management, and ice jam flood 
control. In severe winters, ice jams are responsible 
for more than $100 million in damage due to iceinduced 
flooding. Efforts to understand and control 
ice jams and ice-induced floodings have helped 
reduce their cost to the Nation. 
Accomplishments: 
* The Ice Jam Electronic Database, which 
includes historical information on ice events in the 
United States, was expanded to nearly 9,000 entries 
by the end of FY95. It was installed on the World 
Wide Web for direct access by COE and other 
personnel. An "Ice Jam Archive" was initiated to 
gather trip reports, situation reports, newspaper 
43-1

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY95 
accounts, photographs, etc., documenting past ice 
jam events. When an engineering study of ice 
problem remediation is undertaken, historical data 
are immediately available for background statistical 
analysis. This saves time and cost previously 
associated with the painstaking retrieval of such 
data. 
* A new concept of a low cost ice control 
structure was constructed in the Lamoille River at 
Hardwick, Vermont, in the fall of 1994. It consists 
of four large granite blocks with sloping sides at 14 
feet interval, combined with a flood plain area for 
flow diversion. This demonstration project was costshared 
by FEMA and the town of Hardwick (total 
cost: $105,000). With appropriate modifications, 
this structural concept can be applied to numerous 
ice jam prone sites on smaller rivers when flood 
damages could not economically justify traditional 
structures such as ice dams or ice weirs. 
The structure performed as expected during 
the 1995 spring breakup. It arrested the ice run 
upstream from the town, preventing the formation of 
an ice jam in town and subsequent flooding. On the 
basis of historical data, the probable savings to the 
town of Hardwick in flood damages and flood 
fighting efforts were estimated between $20,000 to 
$50,000 for this single event. 
* Engineer Pamphlet 1110-2-11, "Ice Jam 
Flooding: Causes and Possible Solutions," was 
published in November 1994. This pamphlet 
describes river ice processes, ice jam formation and 
evolution, and ice jam mitigation methods 
(structural, non-structural, permanent, as well as 
advance measures). Continuing heavy demand for 
this pamphlet (more than 300 copies have been 
distributed) indicates its usefulness to federal, state, 
and local agencies concerned with ice jam floods. 
* Model tests on ice impact on riprap by 
rideup, pileup, and shearing were completed and a 
report is in preparation. Criteria were developed for 
riprap sizing to withstand ice impact during river ice 
runs and reduce maintenance cost. 
* The ice subroutine to the HEC-2 (to 
calculate the effect of ice covers on river stage) was 
upgraded and a users manual produced. An initial 
ice subroutine was included in the UNET program. 
A 1-dimensional, unsteady numerical model for 
river flow with ice was completed that includes fully 
coupled hydraulic and ice processes. These various 
numerical models allow users to more accurately 
evaluate the impact of ice on river flow and stage, 
and calculate the benefits of proposed remediation 
methods. 
* Research results on ice effects on sediment 
transport and bed and bank erosion have been 
included in the PROSPECT course "Streambank 
Protection" that is given twice a year. 
* A workshop on "Ice Engineering for 
Emergency Operations" was presented by CRREL 
personnel and hosted by the St. Paul District in 
Bloomington, Minnesota, in November 1994. It was 
attended by over 40 COE personnel and 30 
employees from other federal and state agencies. 
* The first phase of the revision of the "Ice 
Engineering Manual", EM 1110-2-1612, was 
completed. The manual provides guidance on 
dealing with a wide variety of ice problems, 
including ice-jam flooding, ice interference in the 
operation of hydraulic structures, ice impact forces 
on structures, and the load-carrying capacity of ice 
sheets. 
River Confluence Ice Program 
The objective of the River Confluence Ice 
Program is to develop practical methods to reduce 
the incidence of ice problems at the junction of a 
river tributary and its mainstem. The resulting 
benefits will include reduced losses to shoreline 
properties and commercial shipping concerns and a 
reduction in costs associated with icing problems. 
Accomplishments: 
* A review study was completed and 
published (CRREL Special Report 95-18) in which 
various methods of structural control of river ice 
were examined. Examples of each technique are 
43-2

described and their performance since installation is 
summarized. The study includes sheet-ice retention 
structures, breakup ice-control structures, and icediversion 
structures in the United States, Canada, 
Scandinavia, Eastern Europe, and Japan. In 
addition, an inventory of the existing ice-control 
structures provides essential statistics. 
This publication not only introduces.,the 
wide variety of structural ice control techniques, but 
also allows a designer to examine the ice force levels 
they were designed for, and to learn of their 
operating histories as well as performance problems, 
modifications, etc. The document will provide 
essential information for any party considering 
structural ice-control measures. 
* An ice-boom design manual was 
prepared and is in final draft form. It will soon be 
published as a Cold Regions Technical Digest. This 
highly focused guide to ice-boom design supplies in 
one convenient document all the information a 
designer will require to create a safe and effective 
ice-boom design. All that will be needed in addition 
will be the site information characterizing the 
physical features of the river channel, the hydraulic 
parameters of the flow, and the ice information. 
* Two Ice Engineering Information 
Exchange Bulletins were published on nonstructural 
techniques for mitigating ice jams and ice 
accumulations. The first bulletin addresses ice 
breaking, and concentrates on the Amphibex 
amphibious vehicle, which can be deployed on 
smaller rivers not accessible by larger ships. The 
second bulletin describes the technique of drilling 
holes in a river ice cover in early spring to hasten the 
deterioration of the ice cover and lead to a benign 
ice breakup. 
These two bulletins will help operating 
personnel by adding to the inventory of techniques 
available for influencing and controlling the breakup 
and disappearance of river ice in a non-damaging 
fashion. All of these techniques find appeal because 
of their relatively low cost and their expediency. 
*A contract progress report was submitted 
by Clarkson University on the dynamics of river ice 
breakup. This study, which has been curtailed due 
to the cancellation of the River Confluence Ice 
Program, was to have extended into FY 1996. 
However, the work done to date and reported in the 
progress document provides a numerical model of 
the mechanics which govern the form and 
progression of the mechanical breakup of river ice. 
The model formulation accom-plished in 
this study will have value as a starting point for 
future work. Such future work has the potential to 
allow more precise design of engineering works to 
control ice breakup and jamming, to better 
withstand damaging river ice runs, and to enable 
progress in developing deterministic, numerical 
models for ice-jam prediction. 
Remote Sensing 
CRREL is the Program Manager of the COE 
Civil Works Remote Sensing Research and 
Development Program. This program emphasizes 
the exploitation of real-time in-situ sensors and 
commercially available aircraft and satellite 
imagery. These data are integrated into a spatial 
data management system. Development and 
utilization of remote sensing technology for civil 
works applications in water and natural resources is 
urgently needed to provide cost-effective 
information necessary for many of the COE 
engineering, operations, and planning missions. 
Accomplishments: 
* In FY95 significant accomplishments 
have been made in the establishment of an 
integrated water control data system which allows a 
water control manager access to GIS, modeling 
environ-ments, time series and relational databases, 
remotely sensed imagery and Next Generation 
Radar (NEXRAD) precipitation data. This system 
provides the manager with immediate access to 
decision making tools for multi-purpose COE 
projects. 
* An automated snow mapper was 
developed. It uses remotely sensed Landsat data to 
provide snow volume estimates over large basin 
areas and was demonstrated on the Kings River 
Basin, California. This methodology will provide 
key information to private, state and federal water 
managers. 
* Software to effectively use remotely 
sensed data, regardless of hardware platform and 
specific changes in operating systems, has been 
built. These methods include procedures for the 
43-3

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY95 
efficient display, analysis and storage of remotely 
sensed and GIS data using device independent 
methods such as Xl IR5 procedures or Open 
Software Foundation (OSF) motif functions. 
* An easy to use front end (graphical user 
interface) for a commercial GIS display package 
was developed to assist COE emergency managers. 
This was implemented under the technical guidance 
of the Spatial Data (Imagery, Mapping, and GIS) 
Requirements Work Group. This development and 
evaluation effort leverages funding from multiple 
sources to maximize return on investment. The 
primary objective is to assure that front line 
emergency managers have ready access to the most 
current spatial data and tools that permit viewing the 
data and production of useful maps without 
requiring any specialized knowledge of the 
applications software. 
*The type of vegetation that occurs in Pool 
13 of the Upper Mississippi River was mapped 
from hyperspectral image data. This was a joint 
project between the COE and the National 
Biological Survey. The study addressed 
environmental management concerns. 
*Complementary sensors have been added 
to the Scanning Hydrographic Operational Airborne 
Lidar Survey (SHOALS) system to expand its 
capabilities to provide high density hydrographic 
surveys. These developments in remote sensing 
technology have greatly reduced the cost of existing 
projects where data collection and analysis are of 
major importance. 
Oil Spill Research Program 
The goal of the Oil Spill Research Program 
is to design and develop an integrated oil spill 
surveillance and response management capability. 
Results of FY 95 efforts emphasize operational 
needs and tactical solutions with near-term and 
immediately available technologies. Critical to these 
results were the initiation and delineation of work 
efforts to support the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) 
and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for 
coastal and inland waterways as well as identifying 
COE requirements. 
Accomplishments: 
* A successful field experiment was 
conducted at the National Oil Spill Response Test 
Facility at the Ohmsett site in New Jersey with 
participation from COE laboratories, Mineral 
Management Service, USCG, and Department of 
Energy. Results of this experiment include analysis 
of multiple sensors as integrated systems on both 
stable and airborne platforms. The focus of these 
efforts include the sensors ability to determine oil 
type, estimate oil thickness, and weathering state of 
oil under differing insolation loading conditions. 
* Analysis of current operational tools 
defined the need for an integrated display system for 
real-time decision making by the Federal On-Scene 
Coordinators (USCG and EPA). System 
requirements include mapping and charting, 
identifying environmentally sensitive areas, oil spill 
and vessel location for operational control, and 
tactical analysis tools for near real-time contingency 
analysis. 
Water Resources of Cold Regions 
The prediction of runoff, water quality, 
sedimentation and river morphological response 
during winter and spring is important to the COE 
management of the Nation's water resources. This 
program addresses the deficiencies that exist in 
being able to economically and efficiently analyze, 
simulate, and predict snowmelt runoff for flood 
forecasting and water supply, winter low flows, 
runoff and sedimentation from partly glacierized and 
permafrost basins, bank erosion impacts on 
habitats, fisheries and aquatic resources, and winter 
water quality beneath river and lake ice covers. 
Accomplishments: 
* A methodology was developed and 
documented to properly determine/calculate the 
winter low flows for shallow depth rivers in the 
43-4

Missouri River Watershed upstream of Fort 
Randall. The resulting ice cover accumulates water 
and releases it during the spring, but the order of 
magnitude of the growing ice cover can reach up to 
50% of the total winter flow rate. This storage of 
water can have significant impact for estimating 
winter flow to the reservoir system on the Missouri 
River. The above effort resulted in a publication in 
Water Resources Research, a peer-reviewed journal, 
in August 1995. 
*A new initiative on isotope hydrology was 
begun and sampling of the Connecticut River 
Watershed during the summer low flow period was 
completed with the goal of determining if 
environmental isotopes of hydrogen or oxygen could 
be used to separate the relative difference in basin 
flows. Measurements at the U.S. Geological Survey 
gauging sites will be used to determine actual flow 
splits from the tributaries. The analysis of the data 
will be completed in FY96. Additional river and ice 
cover samples were taken in the Chena River 
upstream of the COE Flood Control Structure in 
Fairbanks, AK to determine the applicability of 
using this technique to separate flows in combined 
permafrost and seasonally frozen watersheds. 
*A close examination of HEC-1 and other 
COE hydrologic models used to predict snowmelt 
has revealed some very restrictive limitations on 
their use when extensive clouds and fog are 
dominating the melt. HEC-1 will be extensively 
tested in a large basin to verify our concerns; the 
present thinking is that snowmelt computations 
should be executed outside HEC-1 in a GIS 
distributed watershed system and the results of the 
computations ported back to HEC-1 as a time series 
of meltwater. With the improved modeling 
capabilities of recent years for incorporating the 
radiation terms, revised algorithms are needed, but 
more likely they will be placed in a GIS distributed 
system. This will be verified in FY96. 
Construction Productivity Advancement Research Progam
The Construction Productivity Advancement 
Research (CPAR) Program is a cost-shared 
partnership between the COE, the United States 
construction industry, academia institutions, state 
and local governments, and other groups. Its 
purpose is to cooperatively advance the research 
innovation in the construction industry, thereby 
enhancing its productivity and competitiveness. The 
COE CPAR program is a catalyst for cooperation 
with industry on research topics important to both 
the private sector and the Army. 
Accomplishments: 
* A CPAR project involving CRREL, the 
Construction Engineering Research Lab-oratory, the 
National Aeronautical Space Agency, the University 
of Pennsylvania, and 3M Corporation was initiated 
in FY95. This project involves commercial 
development of an anti-icing fluid for use on the 
Nation's pavements in winter. The fluid promises 
to provide an environmentally sound alternative to 
the corrosive effects of road salt on bridges, 
roadways and airfields. 
* CRREL's CPAR project with the Town of 
Berlin, New Hampshire, and UC Industries 
continued in FY95. The goal of the project is to 
demonstrate the effectiveness of foam insulation 
frost-shielding technology for shallow burial of 
utilities such as water and sewer. Shallow burial of 
utilities promises to generate significant savings on 
construction projects where near surface ledge 
would otherwise force expensive blasting to bury 
the utilities below normal frost penetration depths. 
43-5

U. S. ARMP ENGINEER 
WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION 
RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES 
Background 
The U.S. Army Engineer Waterways 
Experiment Station (WES) has served 
the Corps, the Army, and the Nation 
with technical accomplishments in a 
variety of engineering and scientific 
fields for nearly 66 years. From its 
beginning in 1929 as a small hydraulics 
laboratory established to assist 
in developing a comprehensive plan 
for flood control of the Mississippi 
River, WES has grown into a 280-hectare 
complex of six centrally managed 
laboratories that is the largest and 
most diverse civil and environmental 
research and development organization 
in the world. 
During FY95, WES had nearly 1400 
employees of which 725 were highly 
trained engineers and scientists. 
This professional staff was comprised 
of 183 PhD's, 273 with Masters' degrees, 
and the remaining 237 Bachelor's 
degrees. 
Yearly performance goals are established 
for both the Civil Works 
and Military programs. Within the 
Civil Works program, WES executed 95 
percent of its FY95 civil works authority 
and exceeded all obligation 
and disbursement goals established 
for Military appropriations. 
WES executed a total Civil Works 
program totaling $118.1 million; of 
this total $62.3 million was executed 
in direct allotted R&D Programs. The 
remaining $55.8 million was executed 
in support of USACE District and 
Division offices and non-Corps customers. 
Major non-Corps customers 
included the Tennessee Valley Authority, 
the Environmental Protection 
Agency, the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration and the 
Department of Energy. 
During FY95, WES published 441 
technical documents in-house including 
172 Technical Reports, 52 Miscellaneous 
Papers, 15 Contract Reports, 
13 Instruction Reports, 1 Video Report, 
and 134 special purpose documents. 
In addition to these documents, 
30 Information Exchange Bulletins 
on technical subjects were produced. 
WES engineers and scientists 
also published 93 technical articles 
in refereed journals and 181 technical 
papers in conference proceedings. 
Perhaps the most impressive demonstration 
of customer satisfaction is 
that 48 percent of WES' total obligations 
were accomplished with funds 
provided on a reimbursable basis from 
customers. Another clear measure of 
customer satisfaction is the nearly 
200 citations and letters of commendation 
and appreciation received from 
sponsors during the year. 
LABORATORIES 
The diverse civil engineering and 
environmental quality research and 
development organization is a complex 
of six centrally managed laboratories 
with world-renowned expertise and 
facilities for solving a wide range 
of civil engineering and environmental 
quality challenges. Each laboratory 
adds a unique perspective and 
set of capabilities to the overall 
WES team. 
Hydraulics Laboratory 
The Hydraulics Laboratory, founded 
in 1929, was the original "Waterways 
Experiment Station", the name now 
being perpetuated because of the 
early and continuing renown the institution 
demonstrates in hydraulics 
and hydrosciences. The laboratory 
currently is comprised of 145 scientists, 
engineers, technicians and 
administrative staff. Together, they 
were responsible for executing a 
total program of $28 million. 
The WES Hydraulics Laboratory 
possesses broad and deep expertise in 
the field of hydraulics and hydrosciences. 
Nationally and internationally 
recognized experts in the fields 
of riprap design, navigation engineering, 
pump station design, fisheries 
engineering, sediment transport, 
estuarine engineering, dredging 
equipment, hydrodynamics, groundwater 
modeling, and mobile boundary 
channel design all reside in the WES 
Hydraulics Laboratory. 
44-1

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY95 
Geotechnical Laboratory 
The flood control R&D work of the 
Hydraulics Laboratory led almost 
immediately to the need for soil 
testing and prediction of the behavior 
of structures built on and/or 
with soil materials. Since its establishment 
in 1931, the Geotechnical 
Laboratory has grown to a strength of 
211 engineers, scientists, and support 
personnel executing a total 
program of $29 million. 
The thrust of geotechnical engineering 
involves investigation, design, 
construction, operation, and 
maintenance of structures with, on, 
or in earth materials. From the 
establishment of the Geotechnical 
Laboratory, its personnel have been 
recognized as National and worldwide 
leaders in addressing problems in 
areas such as soil and rock mechanics, 
foundation behavior, engineering 
geology, engineering seismology, 
engineering geophysics, earthquake 
engineering, pavement technology, 
mobility testing and modeling, and 
traffic ability studies. 
Coastal Engineering Research Center 
The Coastal Engineering Research 
Center (CERC) was established by 
Public Law in 1963 as the direct 
successor to the Beach Erosion Board, 
which also had been created by Congress 
in 1930. Located in the Washington, 
D.C., area for two decades, 
it functioned as an autonomous laboratory 
until it relocated to Vicksburg 
in 1983 to become part of the 
WES. In FY95, a staff of approximately 
160 persons executed a program 
of $40 million. 
The CERC is the Nation's center 
for engineering and scientific research 
and development in the coastal 
zone. It is structured around balanced 
capabilities in prototype data 
collection, physical modeling, and 
numerical simulation to investigate 
processes involving waves, winds, 
water levels, tides, and currents, 
and their interactions with coastal 
sediments and structures. Results 
from research in these areas are 
applied by CERC staff, Corps field 
offices, to support the execution of 
projects for coastal flood and storm 
protection, navigation maintenance 
and improvement, and harbor design 
and modification. 
Structures Laboratory 
The Corps' Concrete Laboratory was 
transferred from Mt. Vernon, NY to 
become a part of WES in 1946. In 
1983, WES combined the Concrete Laboratory 
and the Weapons Effects Laboratory 
into the current Structures 
Laboratory. The Structures Laboratory 
employs approximately 150 people; 
in FY95 the laboratory executed a 
program of $35 million. 
Sole Federal responsibility for 
sampling, inspecting, and acceptance 
testing of Portland cement and pozzolan 
rest with the Structures Laboratory. 
It is a world leader in research 
on concrete materials and 
construction techniques, and the 
evaluation, maintenance, and rehabilitation 
of civil works concrete 
structures. Other areas of expertise 
include phenomenology and effects of 
explosions, dynamic properties of 
soil and rock masses, and response of 
structures to a wide assortment of 
loading conditions, including seismic, 
penetration, and blast effects. 
Environmental Laboratory 
The Environmental Laboratory is 
the acknowledged leader for conducting 
environmental quality research 
and problem solution involving the 
consequences of water resources development, 
navigation, regulation of 
wetlands and inland and oceanic water 
quality, management of natural and 
cultural resources, and cleanup of 
contaminated groundwater sediments, 
and soils. For over 20 years, an 
interdisciplinary staff of peer-recognized 
professionals (currently 
numbering 225), augmented with the 
finest network of academic and private 
scientists and engineers in the 
country, have provided the environ- 
44-2

mental quality technology necessary 
to further the Corps' missions executing 
an FY95 work program of $63 
million. 
Notable examples of recent accomplishments 
include a development of 
the Chesapeake Bay mathematical water 
quality model to guide bay cleanup 
efforts, development of innovative 
and cost effective treatment technologies 
for cleanup of contaminated 
ground water and soils, demonstration 
of innovative methods for dredging 
and treating of highly contaminated 
sediments, and development and demonstration 
of wetlands restoration 
technology. 
Information Technology Laboratory 
The Information Technology Laboratory 
(ITL) was established at WES in 
1986 to provide research, development, 
testing, evaluation, and services 
for the Corps of Engineers in 
the information technology and 
computer-aided engineering and computer 
science areas. ITL provides 
WES, the Corps of Engineers, Army, 
and DoD with a variety of advanced 
information technology capabilities 
and expertise. 
ITL had 265 employees and a total 
program in FY95 of $40 million. It 
manages the first DoD High Performance 
Computing Major Shared Resource 
Center; the Tri-Service CADD/GIS 
Technology Center; the Corps' Civil 
Works Guidance Update Program; one of 
two CEAP Regional Processing Centers 
providing 60 percent of the Corps' 
MIS data processing; one of the largest 
high-bandwidth, high-speed data 
communication networks in the world; 
the largest library in the Corps 
which is also one of the finest civil 
engineering libraries in the Nation; 
and the largest publishing and visual 
information facility in the Corps. 
ITL has recognized expertise in 
the areas of high-performance computing, 
application of CADD and GIS 
technologies for facility management, 
computer-aided interdisciplinary engineering 
and analysis, computer 
science applications, software engineering, 
large relational database 
systems, high-speed communications, 
and scientific visualization. This 
expertise is applied to address problems 
in design, analysis, and management 
of projects and facilities to 
support the various missions of the 
Corps of Engineers. 
CIVIL WORKS R&D PROGRAMS 
Civil works research and development 
efforts at WES cover virtually 
the entire spectrum of technology and 
problem areas in the Army's civil 
works arena: 
Environm ntal Impact Research Program 
(ZIRP) 
The EIRP supports the Corps' planning, 
engineering, and operations 
functions by developing, verifying, 
and demonstrating impact prediction 
and assessment techniques; documenting 
and quantifying environmental 
effects associated with various Corps 
activities; and developing and demonstrating 
practical engineering and 
resource management strategies. 
In FY95, the EIRP addressed 12 
separate issues of immediate concern 
to Corps field operating elements in 
terrestrial, riverine, and coastal 
settings. The Corps' widely acclaimed 
and widely used Wildlife Management 
Manual is nearing completion with 92 
sections published and a glossary and 
final sections in progress. As a 
means of assessing the benefits of 
channel modifications for aquatic 
habitats in channels, the Riverine 
Community Habitat Assessment and 
Restoration Concept has been developed 
and applied to the mainstream 
Missouri River downstream from four 
Corps reservoirs. Also pertaining to 
channels, a variety of bioengineering 
concepts for erosion control from 
various parts of the world have been 
documented and a video is in preparation 
as a means of technology transfer. 
Guidance is being prepared on 
selecting and installing vegetation 
along channels to maximize aquatic 
and riparian habitat while still 
maintaining hydraulic efficiency. 
With a focus on coastal areas, 
a conceptual framework is being constructed 
to provide Corps staff with 
a framework for making better decisions 
concerning what types of habitats 
to create and the trade-offs 
44-3

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY95 
involved. Considerable information 
has been compiled on new and innovative 
aquatic-based remote sensing 
equipment and techniques for rapidly 
and economically assessing benthic 
habitats and biological resources. 
In FY95 research was initiated to 
identify potential impacts of Corps 
activities in rivers and estuaries on 
sturgeon populations designated as 
endangered or threatened species 
under Federal or state regulations; 
to conduct a literature survey of 
sturgeon life history, habitats, and 
ecology; and to develop monitoring 
methods for Corps projects that provide 
for avoiding and minimizing 
potential impacts on sturgeon and 
their habitats. 
Wetlands Research Program (WRP) 
WES has been conducting wetlands 
research for over 20 years and is 
considered the Nation's leader in 
wetlands delineation, evaluation, and 
restoration research and development. 
Through the WES Wetlands Research and 
Development Center, the WRP provides 
innovative, cost-effective, fieldapplicable 
guidance to the Corps, 
DoD, other Federal agencies, state 
and local agencies, and the public 
sector. Much of this guidance, for 
example, wetland characterization, 
restoration, creation, and stewardship 
techniques, has direct application 
to regulatory and land management 
activities performed on military 
installations. In addition to publishing 
"how-to" documents, the WRP 
also provides regional training courses 
as a means of technology transfer 
available to all Corps users. 
A major study site of the WRP, the 
Cache River Basin in Arkansas, is an 
internationally known bottomland 
hardwood wetlands ecosystem. The WRP 
has collected nearly 10 years of 
physical, chemical, and biological 
data at this site in an effort to 
develop assessment techniques and 
models that accurately predict changes 
that occur in wetlands over time 
and the impacts that occur as a result 
of human activities. These data 
and others have been used to develop 
a much-needed model for evaluating 
the functions and values of riverine 
classified wetlands. This model was 
developed using a state-of-the-art 
wetlands classification system (HGM, 
hydrogeomorphic) that was developed 
by WES. The HGM procedure for wetlands 
functional evaluation has also 
been endorsed by the White House 
Administration for use by all Federal 
regulatory agencies. 
Wetlands Demonstration projects 
have been conducted at 43 sites dispersed 
throughout the United States 
to field-test state-of-the-art technologies 
for applicability to the 
Corps' mission. These demos contributed 
valuable knowledge and technical 
information in the form of guidance 
documents related to the design/construction 
of restored and created 
wetlands and the management and enhancement 
of existing wetlands resources. 
Corps division and district offices 
obtain direct technical support 
from WES research scientists and 
engineers through the Wetlands Regulatory 
Assistance Program. These 
requests result from a need for technical 
assistance in the field application 
of newly developed techniques/
procedures for wetlands characterization, 
restoration, creation, 
and management. WES scientists may 
also act as a third-party to assist 
in the resolution of complex wetlands 
permitting decisions. 
Zebra Mussel Research Program (ZMRP) 
The ZMRP is the only Federally 
authorized program that addresses 
control of zebra mussels. The focus 
is to develop environmentally sound 
methods of control for use in and 
around public facilities. The zebra 
mussel has spread throughout the 
eastern half of the United States and 
threatens the rivers and water supply 
systems of the Western States. It is 
estimated that more than $100 million 
is spent annually to prevent cata- 
44-4

strophic shutdown of public facilities 
in the east and central United 
States. This cost could increase to 
over $0.5 billion annually by the 
year 2000. More cost-effective and 
environmentally sensitive methods are 
required to control this problem. 
Research areas include the development 
of antifoulant coatings and 
filter systems, use of electrical 
fields, development of environmentally 
compatible biocides, and biological 
control using microorganisms. 
The ZMRP is coordinated with the 
research programs of other Federal 
agencies, regional and state agencies, 
and private industry through 
the Zebra Mussel Coordination Committee, 
established under the Aquatic 
Nuisance Species Program. 
Successes thus far include development 
of a monitoring protocol to 
detect initial invasion of the zebra 
mussel into new areas, verification 
of a filter system to prevent entry 
of all forms of zebra mussels (including 
the microscopic larval 
stage), and use of carbon dioxide for 
control of zebra mussels. The ZMRP 
is transferring this technology 
through the development of a 
computer-based information system and 
engineering handbooks for facility 
managers and the operators of locks 
and dams, water supply and treatment 
facilities, power plants, and vessels. 
The handbooks help the managers 
and operators determine the vulnerability 
of their facility and 
outline control options. 
WES continues to conduct research 
funded by the EPA, which involves a 
multi-year study to determine the 
effects of zebra mussels in the Upper 
Mississippi basin ecosystem. WES is 
working cooperatively with the USFWS 
Environmental Management Technical 
Center to execute this study. 
As the zebra mussel continues to 
expand its range in the United 
States, the audience for the ZMRP 
Technical Notes is also expanding. 
At present, approximately 2,000 individuals 
are included on the ZMRP 
mailing list, and the number continue 
to grow. 
Coastal Research Program 
The Coastal Research Program incorporates 
six coordinated individual 
programs to develop products and 
guidance for planning, designing, and 
building the coastal projects that 
protect the Nation's infrastructure 
against erosion, flooding, and storm 
damage, and provide for safe and 
effective waterways and harbors. 
Research in FY95 focused on understanding 
waves, winds, water levels, 
tides, and currents. Their impact on 
shores and structures is critical to 
the effective and cost-efficient 
design and operation of projects. 
Improving prediction of project and 
structure performance will reduce 
costly over-design and repairs. New 
technologies will provide solutions 
for improving and protecting our 
coastal projects, thereby reducing 
costs and lessening adverse impacts. 
CORE-LOC 
The patented CORE-LOC is the first 
randomly-placed concrete armor unit 
developed by WES for high energy wave 
environments, and was successfully 
2-D and 3-D stability tested in FY95 
as primary armoring and as a repair 
unit for existing structures. Testing 
has produced outstanding results, 
with performance far surpassing all 
other common armor units used by the 
Corps. The Kaumalapau, Hawaii, breakwater 
cost will be $3 million less 
than alternatives by using CORE-LOC. 
Corps Districts are considering using 
CORE-LOC on the Ouzinkie, Alaska, and 
Maalaea, Hawaii, breakwaters; Grays 
Harbor, Washington, and Manasquan, 
New Jersey, jetties; and contaminated 
island retaining structures in New 
York. Patents have been applied for 
in all major industrial coastal countries. 
Inquiries have been received 
regarding licensing CORE-LOC from 
private companies in the U.S., Japan, 
France, Spain and South Africa. It 
is expected that CORE-LOC, in addition 
to saving U.S. taxpayers considerable 
sums of money on coastal infrastructure 
projects, will generate 
substantial royalty income for the 
U.S. government when licenses are 
granted. Under license to the Corps, 
the first CORE-LOC construction occurred 
at the end of FY95 in South 
Africa. Tests will be conducted in 
FY96 for similar breakwater construc- 
44-5 5

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY95 
tion in the Cape Verde Islands off 
the Coast of Africa. 
ACES 2.0 
The Automated Coastal Engineering 
System (ACES PC Version 1.07) is an 
interactive personal-computer-based 
system for use in design and analysis 
of coastal projects; and presently, 
the software has over 600 users throughout 
the Corps, private industry, 
and academia. ACES 2.0, released to 
Corps users in FY95, is an integrated 
workstation-based system connecting 
sophisticated prediction technology 
with large coastal data bases and 
visualization software in a userfriendly 
environment. These systems 
contain algorithms in the areas of 
wave theory, prediction, and transformation; 
wave/structure interaction; 
and littoral processes; and 
allow planners and designers to efficiently 
and comprehensively study 
multiple project alternatives, resulting 
in more reliable and costeffective 
engineering of coastal 
projects. 
SBRACH
The Storm-Induced BEACH Change 
(SBEACH) model was developed to provide 
field engineers with a method of 
quantitative damage reduction evaluation, 
calculation of dune overwash, 
and improved designs for beach fill 
protection projects against hurricane 
and storm erosion and flooding. An 
upgraded version (SBEACH 3.0) was 
released in FY95 for field use. 
SBEACH 3.0 includes several model 
enhancements, primarily among which 
is a random wave model developed to 
provide more realistic simulation of 
storm erosion produced by naturally 
varying wave conditions. SBEACH 3.0 
is presently being used in numerous 
project applications throughout the 
Corps to estimate storm erosion and 
damage for beach fill design. 
Field Wave Gaging 
The Field Wave Gaging Program 
collects data from a nationwide network 
of coastal wave gages. Longterm 
measurements are analyzed to 
produce wave climate information for 
planning, design, and operation of 
coastal projects. About 50 wave 
gages are supported by the Program, 
other Corps projects, and through 
agreements with other Federal and 
State agencies. In addition to 
building its multiyear database the 
program distributes monthly summaries 
of all US wave observations, produces 
standards for wave data analysis and 
reduction, and supports research to 
improve data quality and reduce collection 
costs. 
CEDRS
The Coastal Engineering Data Retrieval 
System (CEDRS) is an interactive 
microcomputer resident database 
system which provides both hindcast 
and measured wind and wave data for 
use in the field of coastal engineering 
and shore protection. The objective 
of CEDRS is to assemble, archive, 
and make available regional 
databases containing data applicable 
to requirements of individual coastal 
districts of the Corps. Regional 
databases have been installed in all 
Corps Districts. CEDRS regional 
databases were updated with the latest 
hindcast and measured data for 
the Jacksonville, Mobile, New Orleans, 
and Galveston Districts. 
Plans are being formulated to develop 
an expanded and enhanced version of 
CEDRS for workstation environments. 
WIS
The Wave Information Studies (WIS) 
produced during FY95, updated wave 
hindcasts and associated statistics 
for Atlantic coastal stations of the 
U.S. for the period 1976-1993. This 
hindcast information includes tropical 
storms and hurricanes as well as 
daily occurrences of typical wave 
conditions. A nowcast procedure was 
developed to routinely produce a 
month of current wave information to 
be added to the wave data base. 
44-6

These new wave data arising from the 
nowcasts were added to the previous 
Atlantic wave information in 1995, 
and will be invaluable for coastal 
planning and evaluation. Studies 
were conducted regarding propagation 
of southern hemisphere swell on the 
Pacific Ocean in preparation for 
supplemental Pacific wave hindcasts 
to enhance the existing database-of 
wave knowledge along the Pacific 
coastlines of the U.S. 
Technologies Application 
Technologies developed in the 
Coastal Research Program were used in 
FY95 to assist CE districts and divisions 
in design of harbor entrances, 
coastal channels, and shore protection. 
Some examples are: 
Yaquina Bay, OR. Recurring damage 
to the north jetty at the entrance to 
Yaquina Bay in 1970, 1979, and 1984 
required $16 million in rehabilitation 
costs. After the repair in 
1988, a monitoring program was undertaken 
to collect field data to determine 
the basic cause of the jetty 
failure. A physical model was used 
to test damage hypotheses. This was 
the first time in the U.S. that both 
waves and currents were used in structural 
stability tests on a moveable 
bed model. Test results support the 
theory that waves on adverse currents 
were the primary cause of damage. 
Data gathered during this project led 
the Portland District to decide on 
letting the jetty cut back by several 
hundred feet (rather than rehabilitating 
it), thereby saving $5-$10 
million. 
Rochester Harbor, NY. Marinas in 
the lower reaches of Genessee River 
are experiencing damaging wave conditions 
due to waves propagating 
through the vertical-walled jetties 
at the Rochester Harbor entrance. A 
1:75-scale model was designed, constructed, 
and tested to develop a 
solution that would alleviate the 
adverse wave conditions. Test plan 
concepts consisted of a dogleg breakwater, 
an offshore breakwater, rubble 
linings inside the existing jetties, 
and/or jetty spurs. 
Kaumalapau Harbor, HI. Kaumalapau 
Harbor, a small barge harbor located 
on the southwest coast of the island 
of Lanai, is susceptible to damages 
from storm generated waves. Major 
storms have caused extensive damage 
to the existing breakwater. A 1:49- 
scale model was designed and constructed 
to address breakwater stability 
and adverse wave conditions 
inside the harbor. Tests were conducted 
for various alternatives to 
alleviate breakwater damage and undesirable 
wave conditions in the harbor 
and develop a stable breakwater design 
using core-loc armor. 
Ocean City, MD. Historically, 
north Assateague Island which is 
"downdrift" of Ocean City Inlet has 
suffered severe erosion and is in 
danger of being breached. A comprehensive 
sand management solution is 
being sought that considers the 
interactions between evolution and 
maintenance of the Ocean City hurricane 
protection project, maintenance 
of the navigation channel 
through the inlet, and restoration of 
Assateague Island. Studies initiated 
in FY95 include use of numerical 
models to investigate eave transformation 
and longshore sand transport 
potential, channel currents, impacts 
of breaches, and design and effectiveness 
of a restoration project for 
Assateague. Results from model studies 
and data analyses being performed 
using a Geographic Information System 
(GIS) are being synthesized to develop 
a comprehensive sand management 
solution for the region. 
Beachfill Projects. Storm protection 
beachfill projects at Coney 
Island, Long Beach, and West Hampton, 
NY, and Grand Isle, LA, were assessed 
using the latest shoreline and dune 
response technology developed through 
the Coastal Research Program. 
Repair, Evaluation, Maintenance, and 
Rehabilitation (REMR-II) Research 
Program 
The REMR-II research program is a 
multi-disciplinary, multi-lab effort 
managed by WES with participation by 
the Construction Engineering Research 
Laboratories (CERL) and the Cold 
Regions Research and Engineering 
Laboratory (CRREL). The overall objective 
of this 8-year, $32 million 
44-7

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY95 
program is to identify and develop 
effective and affordable technology 
for maintaining and extending the 
service life of Corps civil works 
projects. This broad-based program 
encompasses six problem areas: 
Concrete and Steel Structures, 
Geotechnical, Hydraulics, Coastal, 
Electrical and Mechanical, and Operations 
Management. 
FY95 accomplishments under this 
program include: (a) a new design for 
navigation lock lift-gates that eliminates 
the need for replacement 
caused by poor fatigue resistance 
inherent with previous designs, (b) 
cost-effective reservoir shoreline 
erosion control techniques, (c) improved 
maintenance procedures for 
hydraulic structures containing lead 
pigmented paints to reduce adverse 
environmental effects, (d) a patented 
concrete armor unit for rubble-mound 
structures that will significantly 
reduce the cost of coastal structure 
repair, and (e) numerical modeling 
systems for more economical evaluation 
and repair of high-velocity 
channels. 
Materials Research Program 
Four integrated materials programs 
provided solutions to field-identified 
problems involving investigation, 
design, and construction of 
project features associated with 
water control structures. The Soils 
Program emphasized earth- and rockfilled 
dams and foundations; the Rock 
Program emphasized the behavior and 
methods of improving the response of 
rock masses to changing loads; the 
Concrete Program emphasized the properties 
and behavior of concrete materials 
and structures; and the Structural 
Engineering Program emphasized 
development of design and analysis 
techniques as well as computer-aided 
computational tools. The overall 
thrust of these programs is to produce 
project features in a more economical 
manner while ensuring that 
public safety is maintained on Corps 
projects. Selected FY95 accomplishments 
include: 
Soils. Soils R&D has essentially 
eliminated the uncertainty in testing 
and compaction control of large-particled 
soils and has earned the WES 
research team an Army R&D Achievement 
Award, along with recognition from 
the American Society of Materials 
(ASTM). A patent was received for 
the Computer Controlled Ball Valve 
developed under the R&D focusing on 
laboratory determination of soil 
properties. This development enhances 
the reliability of laboratory 
test results through precise, automated 
control and should have wideranging 
commercial applications. 
Accomplishments included completion 
of numerical analyses to provide 
insight for development of design 
guidance for soft soils reinforced 
with geosynthetics. Advances were 
made in understanding and interpreting 
results of in situ penetration 
tests, nuclear moisture density 
tests, and in understanding and analyzing 
the behavior of soils subjected 
to large deformations, such as 
earthquake-induced levee or slope 
failures. Continued advances were 
made in laboratory testing equipment 
automation, correlations between 
expedient field tests and laboratory 
test, and large deformation numerical 
modeling for problematic soils. 
Continued strong emphasis on technology 
transfer has resulted in industry 
and Corps of Engineers adoptions 
of research results including 
previously patented techniques and 
ongoing development of computer modeling 
applications. 
Rock. Numerous improvements have 
been developed to predict the behavior 
of jointed rock masses and their 
interaction with facilities and 
structures. Numerical modeling efforts 
included refinements to the 
Discontinuous Deformation Analysis 
method and Key Block theory, which 
has generated significant interest in 
the academic community. Especially 
important was the development of a 
technique called Simplex Integration 
44-8

that provides a means to perform 
closed-form solutions to directly 
compute the volume and center of 
gravity of complex block shapes. 
Computations are much more accurate 
and efficient than numerical integrations. 
Simplex Integration can be 
adapted to improve the accuracy and 
efficiency of other numerical methods 
as well, including Finite Element and 
Distinct Element methods. Long-range 
improvements in analytical and numerical 
modeling capabilities are being 
pursued and are beginning to have 
significant payoffs. The first international 
symposium on Discontinuous 
Deformation Analysis (DDA) will 
be held in FY96 to discuss recent 
advances including the new SIMPLEX 
Integration technique for computing 
volume and center of gravity for 
complex shapes. 
Concrete. Cost-effective advancements 
in concrete technology are 
evaluated and developed under the 
Concrete Research Program. These 
advances include new materials and 
new or improved construction techniques 
that improve the properties of 
the concrete and/or reduce construction 
costs. Current research is 
addressing advancements in rollercompacted 
concrete, new technologies 
for testing and evaluating concrete, 
an image-based computer simulation of 
the microstructure of cement systems, 
improved horizontal construction 
joint treatments for mass concrete, 
and enhancement of the workability of 
mass concrete mixtures. 
Structural Engineering. This 
research program is focused on eliminating 
the conservatism in the present 
design procedures for hydraulic 
structures. The program is structured 
with work units in the areas of 
fracture mechanics of concrete gravity 
structures, numerical analysis of 
welds, soil-structure interaction of 
walls, flow-induced vibrations of 
gates, and numerical analysis of mass 
concrete structures. This program 
has produced a series of computer 
programs to assist structural engineers 
in the design/analysis of hydraulic 
structures. The program 
field review group has identified 
annual savings of over $5 million for 
the past eight years, and has documented 
the use of newly developed 
procedures on over 2,000 hydraulic 
structures. 
The research in the area of numerical 
analysis of welds and analysis 
of massive concrete structures has 
produced design tools which are already 
resulting in significant cost 
savings. Research products from the 
work unit for massive concrete structures 
were used in the design of the 
Melvin Price Locks and Dam on the 
Mississippi River and resulted in a 
construction cost savings of $1.5 
million. These procedures were also 
implemented during the design of the 
Olmsted Locks on the Ohio River for 
evaluation of the unprecedented construction 
of the W-frame configuration 
of the locks. In addition, it 
is estimated that a construction cost 
savings of over $2 million will be 
realized as a result of using these 
procedures. 
The newest work unit on flow-induced 
vibrations of gates compares 
the dynamic properties of a structural 
model using parameter identification 
experiments with the results 
from finite-element models. Procedures 
are being formulated for the 
assessment of cumulative damage and 
structural reliability of steel gates 
under flow-induced vibrations in lock 
and dam systems. This research effort 
will result in the development 
of experimentally-based models for 
the hydrodynamic pressure field on 
gates under different operating conditions, 
to be followed by the development 
of risk-consistent techniques 
for the design of structural components. 
Earthquake Engineering Research Program
The Earthquake Engineering Research 
Program (EQEN) is an applied 
research program to provide design 
procedures and criteria for assuring 
the seismic safety of many of our 
Nation's dams, locks, and levees. 
More than 200 reservoir dams are 
subject to potentially significant 
seismic shaking and most were built 
when earthquake engineering was in 
its infancy. The life safety risk is 
44-9

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY95 
enormous. The new program is designed 
to characterize the sites, 
physically and numerically model the 
predicted behavior resulting from a 
seismic event, compute the expected 
damage, and develop cost-effective 
remedial measures and improved design 
procedures. 
Geotechnical research solves problems 
associated with ground motions 
and embankment dams; the program is 
divided into geotechnical and structural 
elements. Geotechnical research 
solves problems associated 
with embankment dams while concrete 
dams and outlet works are addressed 
by structural research. The effort 
is extremely cost-effective because 
the cost of partial failure of even 
one facility is estimated to exceed 
that of the entire research program. 
Coordination includes interactions 
with numerous other government agencies, 
industry, academia, and international 
experts. The 8-year program 
began in FY94. 
Navigation Hydraulics Program 
The Navigation Hydraulics Program 
has been instrumental in developing 
design guidance for deep-draft and 
shallow-draft projects that is least 
disruptive to the environment. This 
has included design guidance in the 
form of Engineering Manuals for both 
deep- and shallow-draft waterways and 
transferring past and on-going technology 
through Corps training courses 
and symposiums. The Program was 
deeply involved in early development 
of the WES ship/tow simulator which 
is a state-of-the-art design tool for 
waterway development. The Program 
has continued to provide design tools 
to the Corps field offices which have 
reduced the cost of design and 
maintenance of the navigable waterways 
in the U.S. 
During FY95, research continued on 
the generalization of guidance for 
design of bendway weir spacing and 
height. Bendway weirs are innovative 
river training structures that 
greatly reduce dredging and delays to 
industry, while enhancing the 
environment by creating stable but 
diverse habitats. Generalization of 
guidance from this work unit will 
allow potential application of this 
concept to navigable waterways around 
the country. Model studies, field 
data, and numerical approaches were 
used to modify analytical solutions 
of displacement forces, specifically 
return current and drawdown, produced 
by a moving tow. Quantification of 
these forces, along with secondary or 
hull-formed waves and propeller jets, 
will be used to develop design guidance 
for riprap protection on beds 
and banks subjected to tow-induced 
forces. Quantification of tow-induced 
effects will also be used to 
avoid and minimize, or mitigate potential 
environmental effects of 
navigation. Improvements were made 
to existing hydrodynamic codes that 
resulted in not only increased modeling 
productivity, but more accurate 
representations of riverine hydraulics. 
Currents generated from this 
numerical model are used in the ship 
simulator studies to evaluate navigation 
projects. Model experiments 
were completed measuring the motion 
of the first small craft vessel, a 
lobster boat, for improvement of 
design guidance for shallow-draft 
coastal ports. The six degrees of 
freedom of the model vessel were 
accurately measured using threedimensional 
motion analysis data 
acquisition equipment. This equipment 
has potential use in other areas 
of the Navigation Hydraulics Program 
such as underkeel allowance. The 
feasibility of conducting vessel 
squat measurements in the field was 
investigated using DGPS on the Baltimore 
Ship Canal this FY. Because of 
the success of this exercise (vertical 
accuracy within centimeters), the 
technology will be used to define 
underkeel allowance requirements, 
assist in field investigations of 
small boat ports, and define sailing 
line information for ship simulator 
and environmental studies. 
44-10 10

Flood Control Structures R&D Program 
The Flood Control Structures Program 
is directed at developing new or 
improved guidance for cost effective 
design, construction, rehabilitation, 
operation, and maintenance of flood 
control structures. Every year the 
Corps builds 15 to 20 large flood 
protection projects that cost between 
$10,000,000 and $15,000,000 each and 
30 to 40 smaller projects that cost 
an average of $500,000 each. The 
research provides this guidance results 
in better projects and significantly 
reduces the time required for 
engineers in District offices to 
develop the design or plan for many 
operational and maintenance activities.
These research efforts include 
laboratory, field, numerical, and 
analytical investigations. Data and 
design procedures for hydraulic 
structures and bank stabilization 
measures are currently being collected, 
analyzed, correlated, and 
evaluated for eventual use by field 
personnel. Traditional flood control 
measures are also being revised to be 
more environmentally accommodating. 
New, more environmentally friendly 
flood control methods are now being 
considered for use by the Corps field 
offices. The Flood Control Structures 
Research Program is investigating 
methods to combine the hydraulic 
design principles necessary for a 
flood protection project with the 
parameters affecting in-stream habitat 
preservation and channel restoration 
that together will produce 
environmentally friendly projects. 
Recent accomplishments from this 
program are: a) Developed guidance 
for riprap toe and end section design 
b) Developed standardized test methods 
for erosion control products c) 
Performed physical model tests to 
determine riprap stability under 
impinging flows d) Developed guidance 
for estimating toe scour e) Developed 
a computer-aided design tool for 
lateral-flow diversion structures for 
subcritical flow and one weir orientation 
f) Developed guidelines for use 
of numerical models to evaluate river 
bend flows and analysis of river bend 
velocities for bank protection. 
Several design guidance publications 
including a new chapter in EM 1110-2- 
1601 on riprap design for streambank 
protection have been produced by this 
program. 
The Flood Channels Research Program 
(FCCRP) 
The Flood Control Channels Research 
Program provides both timely 
guidance for the solution of problems 
encountered by the Corps while improving 
and maintaining rivers and 
tributary streams for flood control, 
and systematic methods which satisfy 
requirements in ER 1110-2-1405 designed 
around file based, PC-computer 
programs. Technology needed to fill 
gaps in the existing methods is being 
pursued. The PC code, Hydraulic 
Design of Flood Control Channels 
(SAM), has been developed, tested, 
released, and taught in various 
training courses. Assorted miscellaneous 
papers covering the channel 
stability methods, use of stream 
reconnaissance record sheets, and 
topics on gravel bed streams have 
been printed. Design guidelines have 
been incorporated into engineering 
manuals EM 1110-2-1418 and EM 1110-2- 
1601. 
Current work involves developing 
guidance for predicting bankline 
migration and platform response to 
channel modifications, and for selection 
of platform design parameters. 
In FY95 several existing methodologies 
were evaluated using field 
data and found to be inadequate. 
Also under way are the development of 
procedures to select the channel 
forming discharge appropriate for use 
in stable channel design. Preliminary 
guidance was developed in FY95. 
A systematic method for siting, configuring 
and sizing sedimentation 
basins appropriate for sediment 
transport regime entering the basin 
is also under development. A current 
emphasis is to determine hydraulic 
effects of environmental features of 
flood control channels. To this end, 
work is under way to develop and test 
a methodology for assessing the effect 
of habitat enhancement measures 
on water-surface profiles, and formulate 
guidance for the selection and 
design of habitat enhancement fea- 
44-11 11

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY95 
tures that optimize flood conveyance 
and environmental value. Instrumentation 
was setup on 3 field sites and 
flume experiments began. This work 
will be a joint effort with the EIRP 
(Environmental Impact Research Program). 
Work was completed to determine 
the Manning n values of various 
mature plant species as a function of 
local velocity, depth of flow, and 
plant density for use in both selecting 
the plant species which are compatible 
with the hydraulics of any 
particular project and for performing 
hydraulic design computations for 
those plants selected. It is essential 
that hydraulic properties of 
various plant species be determined 
and documented to maintain the flood 
control capacity of a project while 
providing it with environmental diversity 
in a more complex multiplehabitat 
setting. 
Improvmnt of Operations and Management 
Techniques (IOMT) 
This multi-laboratory, multi-disciplinary 
program managed by WES has 
participating researchers from CERL, 
the Institute for Water Resources 
(IWR), and CRREL. The program is 
focused on providing measurable means 
for reducing costs and increasing 
efficiency in operations and maintenance 
management procedures at all 
levels of the Corps' massive O&M 
program. 
Representative products provided 
to the Corps O&M community include 
Decision Support Software for O&M 
budget analysis, a budget scenario 
generator and comparison tool that 
has completely revamped O&M pre-budget 
analysis and reduced computational 
costs; a multi-regression statistical 
procedure for analysis of existing 
stream gauge records as a 
check for possible gauge elimination 
and resulting cost savings; and guidance 
for integration of automation 
upgrades at flood control, navigation, 
and hydropower projects; and 
QUADRANT, an incremental economic 
analysis tool that is used for hydropower 
and navigation projects to 
assist project decision makers in 
assessing incremental performance 
benefits by adding incremental maintenance 
improvements. 
Aquatic Plant Control Research Program 
(APCRP) 
The APCRP is the Nation's leader 
in aquatic plant research and technology 
for managing problem aquatic 
plant infestations of major economic 
significance in public and navigable 
waters. The APCRP provides environmentally 
compatible, cost effective 
methods for identification, assessment, 
and management of these aquatic 
plant problems. Through direct application 
of APCRP-developed technology, 
researchers have successfully 
reduced the levels of two problem 
emergent species (alligatorweed and 
waterhyacinth) to maintenance levels 
throughout the U.S. Currently, major 
research efforts are focused on developing 
technology to manage two 
problem submersed aquatic plants 
species (hydrilla and Eurasian watermilfoil) 
that infest waters in 43 
states in the U.S. 
Throughout FY95, WES and the Agriculture 
Research Service of the USDA 
continued their cooperative research 
efforts to develop biological agents 
for long-term management of hydrilla 
and Eurasian watermilfoil. This 
included domestic and foreign 
searches for biological agents and 
subsequent testing, quarantine, release, 
and establishment of approved 
biocontrol agents. 
The APCRP continued to develop 
improved techniques for the environmentally 
compatible use of aquatic 
herbicides and plant growth regulators. 
These techniques include the 
development of innovative aquatic 
herbicide application techniques and 
development of controlled-release 
herbicide carriers. 
In FY95, the APCRP efforts continued 
with a working group of applied 
scientists from other Federal agencies, 
including EPA, which have 
44-12 12

greatly enhanced the collective technical 
understanding of aquatic plant 
management. In addition, the cooperative 
relationship with the chemical 
industry, established in 1978 for 
aquatic herbicide registration and 
labeling, was continued. In FY95, 
APCRP continued the development of a 
PC\knowledge-based Aquatic Plant 
Management Planner for use by. CE 
Districts and their state cost-share 
agencies to provide a consistent 
basis for planning and decision making 
processes. 
Natural Resources Research Program 
(NRRP) 
NRRP provides CE natural resource 
managers and planners with state-ofthe-
art technology for managing natural 
resources and recreation at Corps 
projects. Using WES expertise in the 
technical fields of recreation, agronomy, 
forestry, sociology, landscape 
architecture, and related biological 
and social sciences, NRRP has developed 
research products that assist 
resource managers resolve natural 
resource and recreation problems. 
The NRRP developed, tested, and 
assisted in the CE-wide application 
of the Automated Use Permit System 
(AUPS) for issuing Corps campground 
use permits and for collection and 
analysis of trends data. AUPS provides 
cost-savings of more than 
$1 million annually. 
In FY95, the NRRP began developing 
a methodology to apply proven customer 
service techniques to recreation 
and natural resources management 
activities. Application of such 
techniques, which have been proven in 
private industry, will result in 
improved efficiency of recreation and 
natural resources management O&M 
expenditures and will increase the 
economic impact associated with Corps 
water resources development projects. 
Direct technical assistance in 
solving natural resources or recreation 
problems at Corps projects is 
provided through the Natural Resources 
Technical Support (NRTS) 
Program. During FY95, over 50 responses 
to requests for NRTS direct 
technical assistance were provided to 
more than 30 Corps projects. These 
requests included problems related to 
carrying capacity, wildlife management, 
water-based recreation, impacts 
of reservoir pool fluctuation, fisheries 
and waterfowl habitat, and 
visitor attendance and profiles, and 
effects of day-use fees. 
Water Quality Research Program (WQRP) 
The WQRP conducts research for 
solving water quality problems on all 
Corps inland reservoir and waterway 
projects. The WQRP provides costeffective 
methods, applications and 
guidance for problems related to the 
management of project water quality. 
In FY95, WQRP continued research 
directed towards better describing 
and understanding the fundamental 
processes affecting water quality in 
both reservoirs and tailwaters; the 
biotic structure of aquatic systems; 
sediment oxygen demand and gas absorption 
in draft tubes. Particular 
emphasis in this program has been 
placed on assessment and management 
issues. In addition, the program 
continued to focus on developing 
assessment capabilities for managing 
CE water resource projects, such as 
evaluation of remote sensing applications. 
Also in FY95, WES provided over 70 
direct technical assistance responses 
to CE projects requests through the 
Water Operations Technical Support 
(WOTS) Program. The WOTS Program 
provides for the effective transfer 
of technology and assistance in the 
implementation of technology developed 
by WQRP and the Zebra Mussel 
Research Program (ZMRP). Under WOTS, 
WES researchers responded to over 250 
direct one-stop service requests from 
CE projects for solving water quality 
environmental problems. 
Coastal Inlets Research Program 
The 8-year, $20-million Coastal 
Inlets Research Program (CIRP) was 
initiated in FY94. The objective of 
CIRP is to provide technical tools to 
increase the efficiency of Corps 
activities in coastal inlet systems. 
The need for CIRP arises from the 
fact that the Corps maintains marked 
or dredged channels, navigation, and 
shore protection structure at more 
44-13 13

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY95 
than 100 coastal inlets around the 
U.S. The Corps will expend over $8 
billion at coastal inlets over the 
next 25 years. Most experts agree 
that scientific understanding of the 
flow and sedimentation processes in 
inlets is not nearly adequate for 
addressing basic Corps engineering 
requirements, much less for obtaining 
innovative and cost-effective solutions 
to Corps problems. This program 
will provide guidance in selecting 
the most cost-effective option 
for attaining navigability and minimizing 
the impacts on adjacent shorelines. 
Long-Term Effects of Dredging Program 
(LEDO)
The LEDO Program has and will 
continue to provide new or improved 
technology to predict long-term environmental 
impacts and to address 
methods of managing contaminated 
sediments. The technology will allow 
the Corps to meet its dredging and 
environmental constraints in a manner 
that is technically sound while reducing 
or eliminating unneeded constraints. 
Development of state-ofthe-
science assessment technology is 
essential in the planning, design, 
construction, and operation of Corps 
dredging projects and permitted activities 
dealing with contaminated 
sediments. 
The program work units encompass 
three environmental impact areas: 
aquatic, wetlands, and upland disposal. 
Current research emphasizes 
development and refinement of predictive 
tests and management techniques 
for determining bioaccumulation and 
consequences in aquatic organisms and 
for evaluating relationships between 
sediment geochemistry and biological 
impacts; chronic, sublethal, and 
genotoxic effects of contaminated 
material; processes for contaminant 
control at confined disposal facilities 
(CDFs); volatile contaminant 
loss from dredged material; and surface 
runoff quality from CDFs. 
Specific LEDO research thrust 
areas include the following: development 
of testing, evaluation, and 
modeling procedures for CDF effluent 
and leachate quality; development of 
procedures to determine diffusion 
coefficients in capping material; 
remediation of organics-contaminated 
sediments; comprehensive analysis of 
contaminant migration pathways; trophic 
transfer potential of sedimentassociated 
contaminants; toxicology 
of sediment contaminants mixtures to 
benthic organisms; biomarker-based 
alternatives to chemical analysis of 
sediments and soils; sediment toxicity 
equivalence factors of sensitive 
biota; volatiles release from dredged 
material; fate and bioavailability of 
dioxin in dredged material; and techniques 
for managing contaminant migration 
pathways in all combinations 
of disposal alternatives. 
LEDO implementation tools and 
techniques include the Technical 
Assistance Program (DOTS), the Dredged 
Material Management and Assessment 
training effort of the DOTS 
Program, Technical Notes, videos 
suitable for training; EPA/Corps 
regulatory manuals; and detailed 
guidance documents. 
Among the success stories of the 
LEDO Program are the following: 
* LEDO research efforts contributed 
toward development 
of the Ocean Disposal Manual, 
the Inland Testing Manual, 
and the Framework Document. 
These Corps/EPA regulatory 
documents are aimed 
at accomplishing the Nation's 
dredging mission in a 
fashion that protects the 
environment and strengthens 
Federal stewardship of U.S. 
natural resources. 
* The leaching protocol developed 
under LEDO has farreaching 
civilian and military 
applications. It has 
been used in association 
with the Corps' National 
Dredging Program, the De- 
44-14 14

fense Environmental 
Restoration Program, 
and the Corps' construction 
support mission 
for Superfund. 
The protocol has been 
used to determine potential 
leachate impacts 
from sediment 
for the Corps, *the 
Navy, and the EPA's 
Superfund program. It 
is currently being 
used to evaluate mobilization 
of explosives 
from contaminated 
soils at Army installations, 
efficacy of 
contaminant immobilization 
resulting from 
treatment of contaminated 
soils and sediments, 
and the ability 
of additives such as 
surfactants to fa 
cilitate the removal of contaminants 
from soils. The 
leachate protocol is a dualuse 
technology. It was 
transitioned to civilian 
contractors in FY93 and used 
to predict potential leachate 
problems at a number of 
sites for the Port of Seattle. 
Currently, it is being 
used by the State of New 
Jersey to evaluate potential 
sediment leachate impacts, 
and by researchers at Louisiana 
State University to 
investigate contaminant 
transport through earthen 
dikes. It is increasingly 
coming into general use because 
it is the only test 
that provides the information 
needed to quatitatively 
evaluate contaminant losses 
from sediments and soils 
under the environmental conditions 
encountered in the 
field. 
* Development of a national 
management strategy for 
dioxin-contaminated dredged 
material. The strategy is 
risk-based and has several 
cost-saving features using 
previous LEDO products (for 
example, Theoretical Bioaccumulation 
Potential). Application 
of this strategy will result 
in significant 
time and cost savings. 
* Development of guidance for 
the interpretation of bioaccumulation 
of contaminants 
by aquatic organisms. Used 
with the database discussed 
below, this guidance will 
result in significantly increased 
efficiency and cost 
savings. 
In addition, the program continues to 
support a national bioaccumulation 
database and an electronic bulletin 
board to make that and other contaminated 
sediment information available 
to a broad audience. As designed, 
the program continues to have direct 
programmatic input to the development 
of the EPA/Corps Testing Manuals for 
dredged material. 
SHOALS 
The Scanning Hydrographic Operational 
Airborne Lidar Survey (SHOALS) 
is a hydrographic survey system recently 
developed for the Corps through 
a joint program with the Canadian 
Department of Science, Industry, and 
Technology and developed by Optech 
Inc, of Toronto. The SHOALS system 
consists of an airborne laser 
transmitter/receiver capable of measuring 
200 soundings per second. The 
system operates from a Bell 212 helicopter, 
flying at 200 to 1,000 meters 
altitude with a ground speed of 0 to 
100 knots. The Bell 212 is being 
provided by the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration through a 
Memorandum of Agreement. The SHOALS 
system also includes a ground-based 
data processing system for calculating 
accurate horizontal position and 
water depth. Data processing utilizes 
a state-of-the-art depth extraction 
algorithm developed by the 
National Ocean Service. The SHOALS 
system completed field testing in 
March 1994, in Sarasota, Florida. 
During FY95, the system was demonstrated 
on District projects in the 
Great Lakes, New England, New York, 
New Jersey, Florida, and the Gulf of 
Mexico, surveying more than 750 sq 
kilometers and collecting over 40 
44-15 15

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY95 
million soundings. The system was 
deployed to Mobile District in early 
October to perform channel, structure, 
and beach condition surveys 
following Hurricane Opal. In 10 
days, surveys were completed of East 
Pas, Panama City Beach, Dauphin Island, 
Perdido Pass, and Gaillard 
Island. 
Dredging Operations Technical Support 
(DOTS) Program 
The DOTS Program provides direct 
environmental and engineering technical 
support to the Corps' Operations 
& Maintenance (O&M) dredging elements. 
The program's field assistance 
and technology transfer activities 
have supported diverse field 
needs for years and have directly 
benefitted the Corps' dredging mission.
In FY95, DOTS responded to 132 
requests from 31 Corps elements (Divisions/
Districts) for technical 
assistance dealing in almost all 
environmental and engineering aspects 
of dredging and dredged material 
disposal. Major areas of assistance 
included management of highly contaminated 
sediments, application of risk 
assessment methods, endangered species 
issues, application of long-term 
management strategies for dredged 
material disposal, and application of 
new technologies in materials modeling, 
sediment profiling, dredge positioning, 
materials movement monitoring, 
etc. The program also plays a 
major role in application of the 
Corps-EPA Technical Framework for 
Dredged Material Management. This 
framework provides a consistent "road 
map" for evaluating the environmental 
acceptability of dredged material 
management alternatives. DOTS actively 
supported the joint Corps/EPA 
task force, which developed analytical 
procedures and a decision making 
framework for disposal of dioxin 
contaminated dredged material. 
The Corps/EPA dredged material 
management and assessment training 
seminar continues to be supported 
through the DOTS Program where over 
2,200 Corps, EPA, other Federal and 
state resource and regulatory, etc., 
personnel have participated and been 
made aware of the technical and procedural 
requirements for disposal of 
dredged material. 
Construction Productivity Advancement 
Research (CPAR) Program 
The CPAR Program is a cost-shared 
cooperative research and development 
effort between the Corps laboratories 
and the construction industry. The 
purpose of the program is to help the 
domestic construction industry improve 
productivity and regain its 
competitive edge nationally and internationally. 
WES has been a major 
participant in this vital program 
with more than half of the total 
research being conducted by WES and 
its industry partners. 
Five new WES CPAR Agreements were 
signed with industry partners during 
FY 1995: (a) Unique Polymeric Fibers 
and Fiber Delivery Systems for the 
Economic Preparation of High Fiber 
Concrete with Superior Physical Properties. 
This collaborative effort 
with 3-M Corporation is expected to 
result in a new fiber delivery system 
which will reduce concrete use by 25- 
50 percent over conventional fiberreinforced 
concrete, provide concrete 
with higher strength and improved 
resistance to impact and chemical 
attack, and provide for thinner 
pavement overlays. (b) A Time Domain 
Reflectory (TDR) Pulser for Monitoring 
Groundwater Levels with Piezometers. 
This two-year project with 
HYPERLABS, INC. will result in a 
rugged, self-calibrating field instrument 
for remotely monitoring 
groundwater levels/piezometric pressures. 
The use of the TDR instrument 
is expected to reduce water level 
measurement installation and maintenance 
costs by at least 50 percent 
and will cost 50 percent less than 
conventional water level measurement 
transducers. 
(c) Development of a Portable Innova- 
44-16 16

tive Contaminated Sediment Dredge. 
This collaborative effort with DRE 
Technologies, Inc. will result in a 
portable dredge capable of accurately 
removing and transferring subaqueous 
material at near in-situ densities 
while minimizing resuspension of 
contaminated solids. (d) A Field 
Test/Demonstration of a Multi-Segment 
Dewatering System for Accreting Beach 
Sand in a High Wave Energyv Environment. 
This 3-year project with Coastal 
Stabilization, Inc. will demonstrate 
the performance of a multisegment 
beach dewatering system and 
develop quantitative guidance for the 
construction and operation of such a 
system. (e) A New Building System 
Based on Foamed Concrete Cast Between 
Stay-in-Place Forms of Fiberglass- 
Reinforced Cement Board. The result 
of this joint effort with Materials 
Technologies, Limited, is expected to 
produce a building system with reduced 
material costs (20-30 percent) 
and provide labor productivity gains 
of 30-50 percent in commercial, residential 
and civil construction. 
Fail-Safe, Retrievable Microtunneling 
The field evaluation of an innovative, 
fail-safe, retrievable microtunneling 
system that is ideally 
suited for environmental restoration 
and other critical projects where 
surface access is severely limited 
(drives under highways, airport runways, 
or railroad tracks) was completed. 
Features that set this microtunneling 
system apart include the 
versatility to handle practically any 
ground conditions by the use of temporary 
high strength steel pipes 
during the jacking process, a reamer 
system that allows the installation 
of a variety of product pipe diameters, 
and a provision for successful 
retraction in the event that unexpected 
conditions are encountered. 
The WES teamed up with McLaughlin 
Manufacturing Company, Greenville, 
SC, and Markham & Company, Ltd., 
Chesterfield, England, to evaluate 
the performance of the system under a 
variety of known, controlled ground 
conditions at WES' instrumented Microtunneling 
Test Facility. The guidelines 
resulting from this work are 
expected to provide U.S. owners, 
designers, and contractors the justification 
and documentation they need 
to specify and use the system in the 
U.S. 
Horizontal Directional Drilling Beneath 
Levees 
The WES has teamed with O'Donnell 
Associates, Inc., Sugar Land, TX, to 
develop guidelines for installing 
pipelines beneath rivers and within 
levee rights of way using horizontal 
directional drilling (HDD) techniques. 
Field evaluation is expected 
to demonstrate that these techniques 
offer substantial economic and operational 
advantages over current practices. 
A two-phase program is designed 
to investigate hydraulic 
forces, determine the effect of the 
drilling fluid, establish techniques 
for eliminating undesirable fluid 
returns, and develop guide specifications. 
The first phase includes 
development of a conceptual model to 
evaluate machine-ground interaction 
and stability problems using numerical 
modeling methods. Various ground 
conditions, geometries, and machine 
operational characteristics will be 
considered. Findings are to be validated 
during the second phase where 
subsurface pressures will be monitored 
during actual drilling beneath 
inactive levee sections. Industry 
participation will be derived from 
individual pipeline and utility companies 
who have expressed an interest, 
and industry associations that 
include the American Gas Association's 
Pipeline Research Committee 
(AGA-PRC), the Gas Research Institute 
(GRI), the Directional Crossing Contractor's 
Association (DCCA), and the 
North American Society for Trenchless 
Technology (NASTT). The elimination 
of features normally required in 
construction and maintenance of levee 
and adjacent road crossings (bridges, 
concrete boxes, earthen cover, and 
ramps) is expected to save the Corps 
of Engineers and the pipeline industry 
millions of dollars. 
Falling Beam Soil Saw 
The WES teamed with Brown and Root 
Environmental to develop a capability 
to create an underground barrier wall 
44-17 17

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY95 
without the need for conventional 
excavation or backfilling. The Soil 
Saw Barrier System creates a cutoff 
wall by the use of high-energy jets 
on a reciprocating beam to liquefy 
and mix in situ soil with a permeability 
modifying reagent such as a 
bentonite or cement/bentonite slurry. 
Cutoff walls have been installed at 
rates of up to 9.3m2 per minute and 
are expected to produce savings of up 
to 30% over conventional methods. 
Evaluation of Environmental Investments 
Research Program (EEIRP) 
Interdisciplinary research by WES 
scientists and engineers in this 
program, which is managed by IWR, has 
been significant. Increased demands 
for the Corps to pursue environmental 
initiatives have emphasized the need 
for improved methods to evaluate and 
compare proposed environmental projects 
and programs regionally and 
Nationally. 
Currently, accepted methods are 
lacking to assess the effectiveness 
(Does the project meet its objective?) 
and efficiency (Is it the 
least costly alternative?) of investments 
in maintenance, mitigation, or 
restoration of natural resources. 
Emphasis has shifted since early in 
the 1970's from construction of new 
water resources development projects 
to improved operation and management 
of existing projects. Environmental 
concerns continue to receive increased 
attention. 
The objective of the EEIRP is to 
develop techniques to select the most 
efficient and effective projects when 
a common metric of measurement such 
as money cannot be applied to all for 
purposes of comparison. The WES/IWR 
team is developing an evaluation 
framework, techniques, and procedures 
to meet that objective. During FY96, 
a series of manuals will be developed 
to address planning and evaluation 
processes and for use in assigning 
priorities to projects. 
Risk Analysis for Water Resource 
Investments 
WES provides a range of research 
engineering input to this program, 
which is managed by IWR. The objective 
of the program is the development 
and application of risk analysis 
techniques to a variety of Corps 
civil work issues and problems in 
water resource planning, engineering, 
design, operations, and project management. 
Along with increases in 
budget constraints and local cost 
sharing, the concern for cost effective 
performance and reliability has 
raised the Corps' meed to consider 
risk and uncertainty. 
WES work covers reliability and 
risk applications in the areas of 
Major Rehabilitation (reliability 
assessment of navigation structures 
including pile-founded and gravity 
structures, and degradation rates for 
engineering reliability assessment), 
Coastal Structures (evaluation of 
coastal protection projects), and 
Flood Control (determination of 
stage-discharge relationships, and 
stability evaluation of levees). 
Currently, Corps Districts are required 
to justify civil works project 
funding in the area of major rehabilitation 
by providing a report that 
demonstrates a need for improvement 
in reliability or efficiency. Districts 
have cited a lack of criteria 
for assessing the reliability of 
structural performance; therefore, 
WES's work units develop such procedures 
and methods together with 
examples and case studies to enhance 
their usefulness. 
During FY95, WES continued to 
develop and refine guidance and procedures 
for conducting required riskbased 
benefit-cost analyses. For 
Major Rehabilitation, methods were 
developed and refined to quantify 
initial and future reliabilities of 
timber pile founded structures and 
non-anchored gravity structures. 
Computer procedures were developed to 
apply this guidance to reliability 
assessment and quantification of 
44-18 18

structural degradation rates, including 
time-dependent formulations and 
hazard functions. Surveys were conducted 
and analyzed to determine 
degradation rates on verticallyframed 
miter gates and concrete lock 
walls. For Flood Control, methods 
were developed and refined to quantify 
the state-discharge relations 
and analysis of levee stability was 
performed. For Coastal Structures, 
criteria was developed for input into 
a risk uncertainty EC for storm damage. 
WES conducted and/or participated 
in four training sessions of 
Flood Damage Reduction for Corps 
personnel, three workshops on Storm 
Damage Reduction with SAW and SAJ, 
and a district task group meeting on 
Structural Reliability. 
INTERDISCIPLINARY/LARGE-SCALE STUDIES 
Increasingly, WES expertise and 
products developed in R&D programs 
are being requested in comprehensive, 
integrated packages that address 
broad or critical areas of concern. 
Examples include the following: 
Demonstration Erosion Control (DEC) 
Project 
During FY95 WES continued DEC 
monitoring efforts through data collection 
and data management, evaluation 
of the hydraulic performance of 
structures, evaluation of channel 
response, development of hydrologic 
tools for input into sediment yield 
calculations, determination of measurable 
changes in the quantity of 
sediment being transported from upland 
watersheds, determination of the 
effects of the DEC Project on reservoir 
sedimentation, bank stabilization 
efforts including new applications 
such as bendway weirs and bioengineering 
techniques such as willow 
posts, and development of design 
tools for future application of stabilization 
works in DEC. 
Upper Mississippi River - Illinois 
Waterways Navigation Study (UMR-IWS) 
Due to the deterioration of much 
of the navigation infrastructure on 
the UMR-IWS, and the potential for 
increased navigation traffic on these 
key waterways over the next 50 years, 
the Corps of Engineers is evaluating 
alternative investment strategies for 
provision of reliable navigation 
projects on the UMR-IWS. Equally, 
the natural resources of the UMR-IWS 
represent one of the most vital ecosystems 
in the United States. Thus, 
as a critical component of the Corps 
study, the environmental impacts of 
increased navigation traffic on the 
UMR-IWS, and potential measures to 
avoid, minimize, and/or mitigate any 
associated impacts, are being assessed. 
In FY95, WES has conducted a number 
of investigations in support of 
the engineering and environmental 
components of the overall UMR-IWS 
navigation study. Physical model 
studies of potential alternative new 
structures at Locks and Dams 22 and 
25 were completed. These studies 
addressed the ramifications of differing 
structural designs on waterway 
navigability. These studies used 
state-of-the-art visualization and 
data analysis techniques in support 
of superior hydraulic designs. 
In addition, WES continued with 
technical leadership of several critical 
aspects of the environmental 
studies. WES is leading the Modeling 
Integration Simulation Team (MIST), a 
multidisciplinary technical team 
charged by the Corps of Engineers 
with coordination and integration of 
the major environmental study components 
(which are being performed by 
multiple groups). These components 
involve multiple studies in the following 
technical study areas: fisheries, 
aquatic macrophytes, mussels, 
bank erosion, recreational boat 
craft, side channel/backwater sedimentation, 
tow-induced physical 
forces, and hydrodynamic modeling. 
WES is conducting several of these 
study components. In particular, WES 
is conducting state-of-the-art analyses 
of the physical forces imparted 
by moving tows on a waterway, the 
resuspension of sediment resulting 
from tow passage, and the potential 
for transport of these resuspended 
sediments into critical side channel 
and backwater aquatic habitats. 
Field data were collected at two 
locations, Pool 26 and Pool 8 during 
October 1995. 
44-19 19

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY95 
In FY95 WES initiated studies of 
navigational effects on submersed 
aquatic plants. These studies entail 
the assessment of direct effects of 
towboats on plants through stem 
breakage and indirect effects through 
sediment transport and deposition on 
leaf surfaces. Results of these 
studies will be coupled with information 
on towboat-generated hydraulic 
conditions and sediment transport of 
forecast changes in the distribution 
and species composition of submersed 
aquatic plants affected by incremental 
increases in navigational 
traffic. 
New York Bight-Harbor Apex Hydro- 
Invironmental Study 
The New York District anticipated 
needs for process modeling tools 
applicable to the New York Bight, but 
more specifically to the New York 
Harbor and Bight Apex, for the purpose 
of analyzing and implementing 
aquatic-based dredged material placement 
alternatives in support of the 
Dredged Material Management Plan 
Study. These needs required refinement 
of the modeling approach developed 
in the previous New York Bight 
Study and correlated well with similar 
needs of the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency Region II Harbor 
Estuary Program (EPAII-HEP). 
The new study was initiated in 
FY94 with the objective of developing 
the required, validated model technology 
to meet both Corps and potential 
EPAII-HEP needs (including 
wasteload allocation, superfund 
cleanup, and toxics reduction and 
remediation). The new study developed 
a suite of high-resolution models/
tools to simulate hydrodynamics, 
storm surge, water quality, and contaminant 
and sediment transport in 
the Bight and harbor system. These 
models are system wide, including 
portions of Long Island Sound, the 
Bight Apex, and the entire New York 
Harbor Estuary system. During April 
1996, field efforts will be performed 
to obtain acoustic subbottom profiles, 
side-scan sonar seafloor imagery, 
and bathymetric surveys for both 
Lower Bay and Bight Apex of the harbor. 
Bonnet Carre Freshwater Diversion 
The Bonnet Carre freshwater diversion 
project, sponsored by the Louisiana 
Department of Natural Resources, 
The Mississippi Department of 
Marine Resources and the U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers New Orleans District 
is intended to produce a range 
of salinities in the Biloxi Marshes 
of Louisiana and Mississippi that 
will increase oyster production here. 
Salinities in the Biloxi Marshes 
are affected principally by freshwater 
flow, tides, and winds. The primary 
freshwater sources are the Pearl 
River and the several tributaries to 
Lake Pontchatrain. Lake Pontchatrain 
water exchanges occur through two 
narrow passes -- The Rigolets and 
Chef Menteur -- and the Mississippi 
River-Gulf Outlet/Inner Harbor Navigation 
Canal. Salinities in the area 
have been increasing for at least 
several decades due to numerous factors, 
including large apparent subsidence 
rates, confinement of the Mississippi 
River levees, and channelization 
of the marshes. The diversion 
project is intended to reverse 
or slow some of those effects by 
restoring freshwater to the system 
into Lake Pontchatrain. The diverted 
water will supplement natural tributary 
flows to freshen Lakes Pontchatrain 
and Borgne and the adjacent 
marshes. 
WES researchers have used a sophisticated 
three-dimensional numerical 
model to predict the effects of the 
diversion on estuarine salinities for 
a typical 6 month period of winds, 
tides, and tributary inflows. The 
computationally intensive simulations 
are being performed onsite at the DoD 
High Performance Computing Center, 
which WES manages for the Department 
of Defense. Model results will be 
used to evaluate project effects on 
oyster and other fisheries in the 
44-20 20

region. 
Olmsted Lock and Dam Design 
This project, estimated to cost 
$1.2 billion, is the Corps of Engineers' 
largest Civil Works Design and 
Construction project and is being 
managed by the U.S. Army Engineer 
District, Louisville, Kentucky. 
Located on the Ohio River 40km downstream 
from Paducah, Kentucky, it 
consists of two 33.5 by 366m navigation 
locks, a 670m wide navigable 
pass regulatory section, with a navigation 
pool controlled by a combination 
of 6 tainter gates, 150 wicket 
gates and a fixed weir. 
WES expertise in the fields of 
lock design, earthquake engineering, 
geotechnical engineering, sediment 
transport, structural engineering, 
concrete design and high speed computing 
have all contributed to this 
endeavor. Unique features and engineering 
challenges include the need 
for an innovative wicket gate design, 
due to large downstream water surface 
fluctuations and the fact that the 
structures will be built in an active 
earthquake zone. Ground motions due 
to various earthquake intensities 
were determined to use in the design 
of all affected components of the 
project. Thermo-stress studies were 
performed to determine the effect of 
different concrete mixes and construction 
techniques on the residual 
stress of mass concrete in the navigation 
lock. Physical model studies 
are being used to study navigation 
conditions at the structure and to 
determine loads and vibration tendencies 
of the wicket gate. A finite 
element analysis of the wicket gate 
is being developed to assist in the 
structural design of the gate. 
Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Model 
Study
Chesapeake Bay is our nation's 
largest and most productive estuary. 
The Bay is plagued with problems 
(bottom-water anoxia, decline in 
fisheries, and loss of submerged 
aquatic vegetation) that accompany 
agricultural and industrial development 
and population growth along its 
shores and headwaters. WES formed a 
multi-disciplinary team to develop 
fully three-dimensional hydrodynamic 
and eutrophication models of the Bay 
and modeling strategy for providing 
quantitative information to Federal 
and State management decision makers 
for use in Bay cleanup. 
This work was jointly funded by 
the Baltimore District and EPA, and 
was conducted under the auspices of 
the Chesapeake Bay Program and an 
expert Scientific and Technical Advisory 
Committee. The in-depth review 
contributed greatly to the success of 
the study and acceptance of study 
products. 
The achievements of the Bay study 
influenced additional joint-agency 
support of a second study focusing on 
the Bay tributaries. This effort 
will include detailed studies of 
aquatic vegetation and important 
living resources. This four-year 
study was initiated in FY94. 
Cooperative Research with the U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency 
The WES, in conjunction with the 
EPA, has undertaken development of 
spatially varying two dimensional 
watershed models. These models will 
take full advantage of emerging technologies 
such as NEXRAD radar precipitation 
data and couple the watershed 
runoff response to groundwater aquifer 
recharge. In addition, the fate 
and transport of contaminants such as 
pesticides and their effect on surface 
and groundwater resources will 
be determined. Together, these models 
will provide for the management 
and mitigation of pollutants in the 
environment. 
Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill 
Performance (HELP) 
Version 3 of the HELP model is a 
PC software package that performs 
water balance predictions for solid 
and hazardous waste disposal and 
storage facilities. As such, it 
predicts runoff, infiltration, evapotranspiration, 
leachate collection, 
and leakage from landfills and other 
waste facilities. The model is used 
to aid in design of landfills, to 
compare alternatives, to evaluate 
compliance with RCRA and other laws, 
44-21 21

Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY95 
to evaluate groundwater protection, 
and to provide a surface water flux 
for groundwater modeling. 
During FY95, WES completed and 
distributed Version 3 of HELP to the 
international engineering community, 
under the sponsorship of USEPA. In 
cooperation with the Pan American 
Health Organization, the HELP model 
is being translated into Spanish and 
is being fitted with databases for 
Central and South America. Further 
development, verification, and documentation 
of the HELP model are in 
progress with USEPA, Department of 
Energy, and Agricultural Research 
Service laboratories. The HELP model 
is being widely applied for design of 
landfills, Superfund site covers, and 
other containment facilities. 
Los Angeles County Drainage Area 
(LACDA) 
WES is investigating the hydraulic 
aspects of existing high velocity 
control channels in Los Angeles, 
California. This is being undertaken 
as a cost-shared effort between the 
County of Los Angeles, California and 
the U.S. Army Engineer District, Los 
Angeles. Efforts are focused on 
design modifications to existing 
bridges, such as pier extensions, 
changes to the channel invert and 
identification and remediation of 
reaches where unstable flow conditions 
exist. 
WES studies have recommended modifications 
to existing bridges and 
channels that will allow the design 
flow to pass and save many of the 
bridges from complete replacement. 
The WES-recommended changes are much 
less expensive than complete bridge 
replacement, and the Los Angeles 
District estimates that savings resulting 
from this study will be in 
excess of $100 million. 
Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors 
Modeling Program 
In response to the expansion of 
oceanborne world commerce, the Ports 
of Los Angeles and Long Beach, California, 
are conducting planning studies 
for harbor development in coordination 
with Los Angeles District to 
accommodate master plan development 
through the year 2020. The Corps of 
Engineers will be responsible for 
providing navigation channels with 
increased depth and for determining 
effects of the harbor improvements on 
water quality. A comprehensive Modeling 
Program to determine these 
effects based on state-of-the-art 
field data and modeling technology 
was developed. All elements of the 
Coastal Engineering Research Center 
and parts of the Environmental Laboratory 
are involved in this effort. 
Columbia and Snake Rivers Fish Guidance 
Studies 
The number of adult salmon migrating 
up the Columbia/Snake River System 
to spawn has decreased in recent 
years. Some of this reduction has 
been attributed to the construction 
of dams and hydroelectric projects. 
Since juvenile salmon that migrate to 
the ocean along the same path as 
their parents do not use fish ladders 
at these projects, they must pass 
through the powerhouse, over the 
spillway or be diverted around the 
structure. Passing through the powerhouse 
turbines is the least attractive 
alternative because of the high 
mortality rate. 
Numerous laboratory and field 
studies are under way at WES to improve 
fish attraction, guidance, 
collection and bypass to reduce the 
mortality rate of juveniles moving 
downstream. These studies involve 
numerical and physical model studies 
of flow conditions near the structures, 
various screening devices, 
surface collectors, bypass channels 
and other fish guidance devices. 
Field studies are conducted to determine 
fish behavior and reaction to 
various modifications to the prototype 
structures. Acoustic technologies 
are being developed to improve 
the performance of the various bypass 
systems being investigated. Field 
44-22 22

studies were conducted between February 
and May 1995 to obtain velocity 
profiles in the tailwater and fore 
bay areas of the Dalles, Bonneville 
John Day, Lower Granite, Wells and 
Ice Harbor dams. These data were 
used to provide velocity mapping for 
various discharge releases at each 
project. 
Oil Spill Response 
WES is developing products to aid 
in oil spill response and cleanup 
through funding from the Oil Spill 
Trust Fund. An existing oil spill 
model is being modified to provide 
improved capabilities for forecasting 
the trajectory/fate of oil in aquatic 
systems. The model will be able to 
provide forecast updates based on the 
most recent airborne surveillance of 
the oil's location and thickness. A 
GPS-based vessel tracking system and 
assets database are also being developed 
to assist in the cleanup operations. 
The information generated 
from these various components will be 
digitally interchangeable and graphically 
displayed with geographic reference 
through a computer-based command 
and control system. These developments 
are being coordinated with 
the U.S. Coast Guard and the USEPA. 
San Juan Bays and Estuaries 
WES is developing a three-dimensional 
hydrodynamic and water quality 
model of the San Juan bays and estuaries 
(SJBE) system. The SJSE system 
experiences poor water quality due to 
insufficient flushing and excessive 
pollutant loadings. The model is 
being calibrated to data collected 
during the summer of 1995. Following 
calibration/verification, the model 
will be used to evaluated alternatives 
for improving water quality 
through increased flushing and loading 
reductions. The study is being 
conducted through the Jacksonville 
District for the SJBE Program, with 
funding provided by the USEPA. 
44-23 23

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
U.S. ARMY TOPOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CENTER 
BACKGROUND 
The Topographic Engineering Center (TEC) has 
produced a revolution in Geospatial Positioning through 
its Civil Works Research and Development efforts in 
the early adaptation and use of the Global Positioning 
System (GPS). As a result of TEC's pioneering work 
with kinematic differential GPS, the Corps has been a 
leader in developing a technology which is in the 
process of revolutionizing, not only the hydrologic 
activities of the Corps and the Nation, but many other 
areas as well. One of its most spectacular applications 
outside the Corps has been in transportation. And an 
especially powerful application exists in aviation, where 
accurate 3-D positioning is so critical. 
From the beginning, TEC's Civil Works R&D has 
focused on improving the Corps' ability to accom-plish 
its survey engineering work more accurately and 
efficiently. TEC's Civil Works research results have had 
a significant impact on the efficiency of Corps 
surveying, mapping, and dredging operations. 
The Beginning of Global Positioning System (GPS) 
Use in the Corps 
In July 1986, TEC initiated geodetic surveys using 
GPS. At this time, GPS was in its infancy, with barely 
enough satellites in orbit to allow its use. However, 
because of its potential as a developed system, TEC 
scientists and engineers initiated work to develop 
survey and mapping tools, along with the training and 
guidance documentation needed, so that the Corps 
Districts would have the significantly increased survey 
engineering and mapping capa-bilities that they enjoy 
today. 
Continuous Deformation Monitoring System 
One of the first advanced geospatial positioning 
tools developed by TEC which employed GPS 
technology was the very powerful system for 
continuously monitoring the movement of large 
structures, demonstrated in 1989. Although monitoring 
of large structures was possible before this time using 
traditional, sporadic, labor-intensive survey techniques, 
the new Continuous Deformation Monitoring System 
allowed continuous, automated, monitoring of dams 
and other large structures, so that engineers could 
observe both normal and abnormal movements. This 
gave them the ability to be warned of potentially 
serious structural problems quickly enough to initiate 
corrective action prior to catastrophic failure. 
Nationwide Differential GPS (DGPS) Network with 
U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) 
In 1993, as a result of TEC's research and 
development of DGPS for navigation, a partnership was 
developed between the Corp and USGS for nation wide 
positioning. Prior to the formal partnership, TEC 
conducted detailed analysis of the proposed USCG 
system and provided enhancements to improve its 
accuracy so that it would be capable of serving Corps 
needs. This partnership has resulted in a system which 
provides all navigable marine areas of the U.S. with 
DGPS for positioning at meter level accuracy. The 
technology required to make this possible was 
differential GPS code positioning for hydrographic 
activities, studied by TEC starting in 1988. This 
system is now in use throughout the U.S., and not only 
for hydrographic activities. During FY95, when parts of 
the system had been momentarily shut down for repair, 
calls were received from farmers over 200 miles distant 
who had been using the system for cultivation and crop 
dusting, both air and ground. Recently, the system 
was dedicated by top government officials, and the 
Corps was congratulated by Secretary Pena for an 
excellent job in its Corps/USGS partnership. 
On-The-Fly (OTF) DGPS 
In 1993, TEC introduced the first robust system for 
high-accuracy positioning while moving. Work on this 
system was initiated in 1988 when TEC developed 
kinematic DGPS software allowing 3-D positions to be 
taken, with centimeter accuracy, for rapid dam 
monitoring while walking or driving over the structure. 
By 1992, TEC had initiated application of the OTF 
DGPS system to aerial photogrammetry, leading to the 
development of a technology which allowed aerial 
survey with significantly less ground control. In FY95, 
TEC used its OTF system, in partnership with the 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
(NOAA), for measuring tides in the coastal areas, and 
with the St. Louis District, for measuring the hydraulic 
gradient of the Mississippi River. 
Hydrographic Remote Sensing and Fly-Throughs 
During 1995, TEC combined its OTF technology 
with its remote sensing technology and subsurface 
measuring systems to provide the Corps Districts with 
a real-time river bottom data acquisition and display 
capability. When the data taken during a "remote 
sensing" cruise up the river is stored and displayed with 
fly-through software, it can be used back at the District 
office to provide a simulated fly-through of the river 
45-1

U.S. ARMY TOPOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CENTER 
bottom area. When this system was first demonstrated 
at the St. Louis District where the river bottom data 
originated, the engineers immediately saw that several 
weirs, which a contractor had reportedly removed, 
were still in place. Use of this system will greatly 
speed and reduce the cost for both acquiring river 
bottom data, and for accurately checking on river 
bottom construction projects. The river bottom image, 
as shown in a few seconds on a computer screen in a 
simulated fly-through, would take hundreds of 
engineering hours of data plotting and interpretation to 
provide the same informational clarity. 
Technology Overview 
TEC is a widely recognized laboratory whose primary 
technologies relate to accurate, realistic, and timely 
hardcopy map products, field guides, and softcopy 
visualization of the earth's surface for both military and 
non-military applications. With the increased emphasis 
on construction and infrastructure efficiency, and on 
the recovery, sustenance, and enhancement of the 
earth's life-support systems, it has become increasingly 
urgent to develop effective tools for surveying and 
mapping, and for environmental monitoring and control. 
To meet this challenge, TEC scientists and engineers 
have developed faster, more accurate, and costeffective 
ways to use remote sensing tech-nologies to 
describe, characterize, and analyze the surface of the 
earth. The tools and technologies that TEC provided 
for the rapid deployment and precise management of 
forces in Desert Shield and Desert Storm are being 
applied to environmental restoration and management. 
Most recently, TEC has brought advanced technologies 
and capabilities to the Bosnia peace negotiations, both 
in Belgrade, Yugoslavia and in Dayton, Ohio, and it is 
currently using new technologies to provide accurate 
terrain elevation data for the re-construction of Bosnia's 
infrastructure. These are technologies whose feasibility 
has been proven and which may soon become 
operationally supportable for use in the Civil Works 
community. The ultimate success of the nation and the 
globe to creatively meet the environmental and 
infrastructure challenges of tomorrow could well 
depend on the successful adaptation of technologies 
that TEC has developed, largely for combat military 
purposes, to existing and new civil program 
applications. 
TEC's technologies provide the nation with a "visual 
stethoscope" with which to diagnose and focus 
corrective action in assessing, maintaining, and 
enhancing our nation's environmental health. The 
technologies for which TEC is responsible are 
integrating technologies, bringing together the 
macroscopic view from air and space and the 
microscopic view on the ground. The exploitation of 
these visualization, spectral, and spatial data 
capabilities provides the nation with very powerful tools 
for use in environmental monitoring and resource 
management, serving both our domestic needs and our 
global leadership role. 
TEC's ability to cost-effectively participate in the 
Corps Civil Works Program is enhanced by its extensive 
ongoing efforts in the development of remote sensing 
technologies for both military and non-military 
applications. These efforts include the following 
research and development activities: 
* Development of spatial data and its analysis, 
integration, and transfer systems 
* Automated Image registration techniques 
* Development of advanced image compression 
techniques 
* Multispectral image (MSI) and hyperspectral image 
(HSI) analysis 
* MSI/HSI enhanced software development 
* Development of one of the world's most extensive 
spectral signature data bases 
* Computer-assisted stereo editing 
* Photogrammetric interfaces with computer vision 
* Rapid mapping using interferometric synthetic 
aperture radar (IFSAR) 
* Research in neural networks and wavelet 
transforms for HSI and IFSAR data processing and 
image classification 
* Change detection 
* Development of precise positioning systems 
* Terrain visualization, and 
* Extensive modeling and simulation. 
TEC, currently developing one of the world's most 
extensive spectral signature data bases, along with the 
techniques and tools to exploit it, offers remote sensing 
technologies that could form an essential part of a new 
national approach to infrastructure engineering and 
environmental management. These technologies 
include advanced, efficient methods of surveying and 
mapping, as well as advanced methods of identifying 
environmental problems and trends on the earth's 
surface. These tools can already accurately 
characterize different surface conditions, including 
certain types and conditions of vegetation, soils, and 
surface water. With further development, these tools 
can provide operationally supportable tools for rapid 
and accurate monitoring of change in the biosphere, to 
indicate both the location of point and non-point 
pollution sources as well as to warn of impending 
negative or positive trends. 
The extensive development of remote sensing 
technologies for use in construction, environmental 
rehabilitation, and resource management will give the 
nation the research and operational tools it needs to 
increase its capabilities to accomplish tasks which 
might otherwise not be feasible, while at the same time 
doing existing tasks more rapidly, more accurately, and 
at the lowest possible cost. 
TEC looks forward to helping the Corps and the 
nation increase its survey and mapping capability, 
improve its construction and transportation efficiency, 
45-2

U.S. ARMY TOPOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CENTER 
and develop efficient environmental and resource 
management tools by adapting geospatial data and 
remote sensing technologies for civil program use. 
OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FY95 
During FY95 the Survey Engineering Team, formerly the 
Precise Survey Team, continued providing support to 
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Civil Works 
(CW) activities in the survey engineering and mapping 
sciences. They also broadened their activities by 
providing support to the Department of the Interior's 
U.S. Geological Survey, and the Department of 
Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration (NOAA). The efforts spanned the range 
of survey engineering from differential GPS applications 
to hydrographic surveying, structural deformation 
studies, development of new software, and new Civil 
Works Criteria Documentation. Activities for other civil 
agencies included the following: 
* Surface water quality monitoring for the EPA 
* Cooperative wetlands and aquatic studies with the 
Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) and EPA, 
and 
* South Florida Ecosystem Restoration for the U.S. 
Geological Survey 
Global Positioning System (GPS) 
One of TEC's major accomplishments in recent years 
has been the development of the real-time centimeter 
GPS On-The-Fly (OTF) positioning system. The OTF 
GPS system allows accurate real-time 3-dimensional 
positioning of a moving vehicle. TEC's system is the 
first OTF system in the world, packaged in a robust, 
reliable system, to have been publicly demonstrated 
with centimeter accuracy using GPS carrier phase 
measurements. TEC's pioneering work on OTF GPS 
has been exploited by the private sector and is now 
being introduced to the commercial world of water, 
land, and air navigation, and to OTF survey engineering. 
The GPS is a satellite navigation, timing and ranging 
system developed by the Department of Defense 
(DOD). Highly efficient measurements of position can 
be made with GPS using several techniques, with 
accuracies ranging from meters to millimeters. The 
operational prototype of TEC's OTF system was 
completed in 1993, and formal demonstrations were 
held in Wilmington, North Carolina (Oct 93) and 
Astoria, Oregon (Nov 93). Both demonstrations were 
outstanding. 
The OTF GPS System provides real-time positions 
accurate to the centimeter level in all three dimensions. 
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers clearly set the tempo 
for this type of GPS positioning, and opened the door 
to its current state of commercialization by several 
manufacturers. TEC's OTF GPS system is the 
crowning product of a six year research effort funded 
under the USACE Dredging Research Program. 
Although the initial group targeted to benefit from the 
OTF technology was the Corp's hydrographic 
surveyors and the U.S. dredging industry, this 
technology, because of its unique ability to provide 
accurate 3-dimensional positioning anywhere on the 
globe, is being commercialized for many applications, 
and is revolutionizing the face of surveying, 
engineering, navigation, air traffic control and aircraft 
precision approach systems. TEC's continued 
development of several applications of this technology 
are already underway. Examples are the Construction 
Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) effort with 
Caterpillar, research to determine tides in real time, and 
work with autonomous land vehicles. Several agencies 
and representatives from industry have approached 
TEC about its robust OTF centimeter system. 
TEC has successfully aided the Corps districts and 
divisions in the implementation of Differential GPS 
(DGPS) to the extent that they have great confidence 
in and call frequently upon the expertise of TEC. 
Assistance ranges from a variety of technical questions 
and training to helping in the establishment of regional 
and national implementation plans. A great deal of 
time, effort and funds have been saved in this manner. 
A premier example of how TEC has served the Corps 
is the support lent to the Lower Mississippi Valley 
Division (LMVD) for the establishment of a DGPS 
system along the Mississippi River. Experiments run by 
TEC, the United States Coast Guard (USCG), and the 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
(NOAA) illustrated how the USGS radio beacon system 
could be used by the USACE for dredging contract 
payment surveys. A Memorandum of Agreement 
(MOA) was signed in early 1994 to combine DGPS 
systems and run the joint radio beacon system up the 
inland rivers, saving the government, industry and taxpayers 
large amounts of money. And during 1995, that 
system was extended and used, not only by the inland 
river system users, but by farmers and crop dusters 
over 300 kilometers distant. 
Another large effort that TEC completed in FY95 
reflects TEC's and the Corps' reputation as a leader in 
GPS and surveying expertise. In early 1994, the 
Department of Transportation (DOT) asked TEC to be 
the GPS expert on a study to determine the optimum 
system or systems to augment GPS for use by federal 
users. The primary goal of this study was to provide, 
through an independent evaluation, a GPS 
augmentation architecture that would meet the needs 
and requirements of most, if not all, federal users with 
a primary goal of meeting transportation requirements. 
A GPS augmentation architecture can consist of a 
number of different applications including, but not 
limited to wide area/local area differential GPS, 
subcarriers, triangulation, dead reckoning, and map 
matching. For the purposes of this study, this also 
included distribution of integrity information and 
increased availability of navigation information. The 
report was published in December, 1994 under the 
45-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
National Telecommunications and Information 
Administration (NTIA) of the Department of Commerce. 
The title of the report is "A Technical Report to the 
Secretary of Transportation on a National Approach to 
Augmented GPS Services" and is NTIA Special 
Publication 94-30. Oversight of the study was provided 
by a Study Review Board (SRB), which consisted of top 
level officials from the Department of Transportation 
(DOT), Department of Defense (DOD), and the National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The 
study was managed by the Federal Highway 
Administration (FHWA) through an Inter-Agency 
Agreement with the Institute for Telecommunications 
Sciences (ITS) of the National Telecommunications and 
Information Administration. 
The additional work that TEC conducts in its 
interface with the larger surveying community has 
aided tremendously in posturing TEC to represent the 
Corps in the conduct of work at this level. TEC has 
representatives working with the Federal Geodetic 
Control Subcommittee (FGCS) and has been 
instrumental in the development of standards for GPS 
within the larger federal community. 
Hydrographic Survey 
Work continued on gaining experience and 
knowledge of multibeam sonar systems and their ability 
to meet the requirements of the Corps hydrographic 
surveying activities. The results from the studies will 
be incorporated into the USACE EM 1110-2-1003, 
Hydrographic Surveying. 
During the summer of 1995 a U.S. Coast Guard 
buoy was outfitted with a TEC DGPS system to 
measure tidal datums off the coast of Galveston, 
Texas. This project supported a USACE R&D program 
and was conducted in partnership with the National 
Ocean Service (NOS). NOS conducted hydrographic 
surveys in Galveston Bay using TEC developed GPS 
software to process the height and position of the 
survey vessel, in conjunction with the tidal datum 
information generated with the "GPS Buoy". All of the 
information is being correlated with conventional tidal 
modelling and hydrographic survey techniques to 
assess the overall improvement to a hydrographic 
survey based on the TEC On-The-Fly GPS software. 
The OTF software was also used in the St. Louis 
district to directly measure the hydraulic grade line of 
the Mississippi River along about 60 miles of the river 
below St. Louis. This technique eliminates vessel squat 
and draft problems for hydrographic surveys and allows 
a district to refine the theoretical grade lines for 
potential improvements in river structure design. 
A tidal datum diagram was developed for the San 
Francisco District's Oakland Harbor deepening project 
in direct support of their dredging operations. 
Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems 
TEC provided database development services and 
technical advice for the Tampa Pilots Association to 
develop a Vessel Information and Piloting System 
(VIPS). The Pilots Association had requested digital 
channel survey information from the Jacksonville 
District so that the database contractor, SevenCs of 
Germany, could develop a prototype VIPS for Tampa 
and Hillsborough Bays. To facilitate the data transfer, 
TEC translated the Jacksonville design files into a 
common digital exchange format (DXF) and provided 
related information, such as chart datum and features 
description. 
In support of the USACE Oil Spill R&D program, TEC 
is producing detailed electronic charts for some key 
ports that would be used for oil spill planning. As this 
work proceeds beyond FY95, TEC will overlay detailed 
channel information from Corps surveys onto NOAA 
raster nautical charts and provide the data to Coast 
Guard planners. 
TEC is developing DX-90 translation capability. DX- 
90 is the internationally recognized format for 
electronic chart systems. The translator will enable the 
user to link all objects in a survey file with DX-90 
objects, thus producing a detailed and complete 
translation. This will allow USACE hydrographic 
surveys to be automatically loaded into commercial 
ECDIS software packages. 
Engineering Survey 
Extensive studies were conducted of all known 
differential GPS service providers in support of river 
engineering activities along the Lower Mississippi River. 
The service providers included the U.S. Coast Guard 
(USCG) Radio Beacon system, Omnistar, Accqupoint, 
and DCI. These studies will be used to develop 
guidance on improving operations of the Lower 
Mississippi Valley Division (LMVD) revetment 
construction. 
A structural deformation study was conducted on 
the Olmstead Locks and Dam on the Ohio River for the 
Louisville District. This study provided many 
enhancements to the existing recommendations and 
provided a single reference document for subsequent 
construction of monitoring systems for the structure. 
A similar study was also performed for several projects 
in the Huntington District. 
In support of the U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) 
hydraulic studies for the South Florida Ecosystem 
Restoration Initiative, TEC conducted ground surveys 
over 225 square miles. A digital elevation data base 
was developed with accuracies of 6 inches, including 
most breakpoints and topographically significant 
features. 
Construction Productivity Advancement Research 
(CPAR) 
TEC has two CPAR projects, both of which include 
the use of its On-The-Fly GPS system. 
45-4

U.S. ARMY TOPOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CENTER 
Advanced Hydroaranhic Survevinag/Dredging System 
Work continued on TEC's "Advanced Hydrographic 
Surveying/Dredging System" CPAR project in 
partnership with Coastal Oceanographics. The 
objective of this CPAR project is to implement new 
technology and procedures for hydrographic surveying 
in support of the dredging industry. This is being 
achieved through integration of USACE technology and 
standards into a commercial hydrographic survey 
system. During FY95 the following enhancements 
were made and provided to system users: 
* integration of On-The-Fly GPS; 
* integration of multibeam sonar; 
* a classification scheme for hydrographic surveys by 
using criteria from EM 1110-2-1003 
embedded into the product software; and, a volume 
computation routine to utilize the data from single 
transducer and multi-beam swath systems. 
When completed in FY96, Coastal Oceanographics will 
market their CPAR-modified HYPACK software to 
dredging contractors. This new software will have 
been significantly improved by its ability to collect data 
from multi-beam systems, incorporate high-accuracy 
GPS, compute dredge volumes using the triangulated 
irregular network (TIN) method, and produce final data 
files in a recognized exchange format. 
Autonomous Construction Vehicle Navigation and 
Automation (Robotics) 
Work continued on TEC's "Autonomous Construction 
Vehicle Navigation and Automation (Robotics)" CPAR 
with Caterpillar, Inc. The objective of this project is 
development of a system to position, track, and 
maneuver construction and other equipment (off 
highway trucks, dozers, or graders) during their normal 
construction activities. The positioning system will use 
On-The-Fly (OTF) software developed by TEC that uses 
the Global Positioning System (GPS) to position a 
moving vehicle with centimeter accuracy. This project 
includes the integration of TEC GPS software with 
Caterpillar's database management software. When 
complete in 1996, this development will be marketed 
by Caterpillar as an automation tool for heavy earth 
moving equipment. 
This project will produce an idealized autonomous 
construction vehicle navigation and automation system 
that will be modified and adapted to various 
construction vehicle platforms. Computer Aided Design 
and Drafting (CADD) tools based on the envisioned 
vehicle navigation system will be integrated, offering 
the user highly accurate responsive production, 
planning and monitoring tools not currently available. 
Major accomplishments of this CPAR project include 
the following: 
* The TEC hardware and positioning software was 
successfully combined with Caterpillar's Dynamic 
Site Data Base on a Track-type Tractor (dozer) at the 
Peoria Proving Grounds. The machine operator was 
able to prepare a section of a highway construction 
site without grade stakes or a survey crew, relying on 
the geographical display on the machine only. 
Simultaneously, the dynamic construction site data 
was broadcast to a remote location (Reference 
Station/Base) and updated in real time to provide a 
current, topographic model of the site. 
* Comparative tests of positioning hardware and 
software were completed at Caterpillar Inc. to 
evaluate the static and dynamic performance. 
Acquisition, reacquisition, and repeatability were 
evaluated under simulated "deep open pit mining" 
conditions where satellites were intermittently 
shaded. 
* Caterpillar participated in the Senior Engineer 
Leadership Training Conference (SELTC) held at Ft 
Leonard Wood, MO. TEC provided Caterpillar with 
Intergraph CADD design drawings for a fuel bladder. 
These design drawing were combined with a 
topographic survey of the demonstration area and 
transferred to the Computer Aided Earthmoving 
System (CAES) which was installed on a D-7H Dozer 
and 815 Compactor. The demonstration was a huge 
success, the system operated without failure and 
was well received by the attendees. 
Software Development 
The team continued to update and provide support 
for several software packages including CORPSCON, 
the popular coordinate transformation package. At 
least one call per day was fielded on CORPSCON, 75% 
of which were from non-federal users. To minimize the 
impact of these requests, and to make software as 
widely available as possible, a world wide web page 
was developed. 
USACE established a policy under Executive Order 
12906, the National Spatial Data Infrastructure, to 
develop and place on the Internet, metadata files of all 
USACE spatial data holdings. In support of this policy, 
TEC developed the software package CORPSMET to 
facilitate the easy creation of metadata files. This 
software has been distributed throughout the Army, 
Navy and Air Force components with engineering and 
facilities management responsibilities. 
Training 
TEC's Survey Engineering Team provided lead 
instructors for PROSPECT courses in Advanced 
Surveying, GPS Surveying, Hydrographic Surveying and 
GPS Overview. 
Surface Water Quality Monitoring Technologies 
Demonstration 
TEC, through an Interagency Agreement with the 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), received 
project funds to assess the use of defense-related 
technology and imagery data to address a current, high 
priority water quality monitoring need and then to 
45-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
demonstrate the technology's potential from both 
economic and ecological perspectives. Initial success 
led to project funding from the CIA's Government 
Applications Task Force (GATF). The GATF was 
established to take defense-related imagery research 
results and apply them to environmental problems. 
Defense-related imagery capabilities were exploited to 
determine the likelihood of temperature impairment in 
several watersheds in three Pacific Northwestern 
states; Oregon, Washington and Idaho. Degraded 
water quality in many Pacific Northwest rivers and 
streams has led to a rapid decline in anadromous fish 
populations. The goal of the 1995 EPA/GATF project 
was to integrate defense-related imagery capabilities 
and commercial remote sensing technologies with 
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technologies to 
effectively characterize riparian zones in the Pacific 
Northwest for water quality assessments. 
In conjunction with the U.S. Forest Service's 
Pacific Northwest Research Station, TEC collected 
ground truth data at seven key watersheds in the 
Pacific Northwest. Vegetation and stream morphology 
data were collected to be used as a training set for 
imagery data extraction. Global Positioning System 
(GPS) data was collected using the Position 
Lightweight GPS Receiver (PLGR), providing a real-time 
accuracy of + /-10 meters for GIS data registration and 
mapping. TEC personnel used ARC/Info GIS software 
to create programs which could extract topographic 
data from 1:24,000 scale Digital Elevation Models 
(DEMs). Combined with imagery-derived 
vegetation/stream parameters, this data base was 
forwarded to EPA modelers who used it to predict the 
likelihood of stream temperature impairment. The EPA 
model also simulates changes in riparian zone 
vegetative shading characteristics and is intended to 
help land-management decision makers pick the best 
watershed restoration project locations. Forward 
Looking Infrared (FLIR) data was collected for 900 
miles of rivers and streams during 1995. Due to the 
overwhelming amount of data, FLIR processing 
procedures were developed to semi-automate the 
identification of cool water seeps and springs which 
provide a protective habitat for migratory salmon and 
trout species. Both GPS and FLIR technologies are 
routinely used by DoD in support of it's military 
missions worldwide. Using these capabilities and 
defense-related imagery data for environmental 
monitoring applications is proving to be extremely 
beneficial to land management decision makers in the 
Pacific Northwest. 
A technology demonstration was developed using 
ARC/Info software which outlined the remote sensing 
and ancillary GIS data sets used during the execution 
of this project. This demonstration was presented at 
the 1995 EPA-sponsored National Symposium entitled 
"Using Ecological Restoration to Meet Clean Water Act 
Goals." In addition to the demonstration, TEC created 
a homepage on the World Wide Web (WWW) 
explaining the benefits of using DoD and commercial 
remote sensing/GIS technologies for environmental 
applications. The WWW address is: 
"http://www.curly.tec.army.mil/spectral.html" 
Spectral Research and Environmental Applications 
Environmental studies being conducted by the Remote 
Sensing Technology Division staff include collaborative 
studies with other agencies. Collaboration leverages 
the Division's in-house spectroradiometric 
measurements, digital multi-spectral video, and 
multi/hyperspectral (MSI/HSI) image processing 
capabilities with other agency and private industry 
capabilities. Shared scientific interest and data are 
primary objectives. Acquired data and experience 
have dual use for meeting civil and military intelligence 
and environmental requirements. 
South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Project: 
Using Digital Multisnectral Videography 
(DMSV) to Model Vegetative 
Resistance to Flow 
A cooperative research study between TEC and 
the U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) National Mapping 
and Water Resources Divisions integrated ground 
spectral reflectance data and narrow band DMSV to 
characterize vegetation in the Everglades. As part of 
the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Project, TEC 
and USGS performed research to find out if DMSV 
could be used to develop vegetation roughness models 
that would provide a bay to determine vegetative 
resistance to flow. This research is part of a larger 
vegetative resistance to flow effort for the Everglades. 
EnvironmentalNVegetation Stress 
TEC conducted greenhouse and preliminary field 
spectrofluorescence studies of plants doped with 
specific heavy metals. 
Wetlands/Aquatic Studies 
Cooperative studies with Virginia Institute of Marine 
Science (VIMS) and EPA were conducted of wetland 
environments in Northern Virginia, using digital 
multispectral video (DMSV) and ground based 
spectroradiometric measurements. 
Oil Spill Research 
TEC participated in Program 100; Oil Spill Research, 
being performed by the Cold Regions Research and 
Engineering Laboratory (CRREL). The purpose of TEC's 
activities was to develop information that would help 
in the selection of an optimum suite of airborne 
sensors for use in oil spill clean-up operations. TEC's 
activities were focused on spectral analysis of oil 
products on water at the Ohmsett Spill Facility, 
Leonardo, New Jersey. Spectroradiometric 
measurements were taken of several different oils and 
45-6

U.S. ARMY TOPOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CENTER 
oil-water emulsions floating on a brackish water 
background. Near surface spectral images were 
acquired for six ultraviolet(UV)-visible wavebands using 
an Xybion imaging system. And from aircraft, TEC's 
Digital Multispectral Video (DMSV) system acquired 4- 
band, UV-visible-near infrared imagery. The Xybion 
and DMSV imaging systems proved capable of 
detecting the oil against the spill tank background and 
were able to discern relative oil film thickness 
gradients. 
Criteria Documentation 
Two guide specifications were revised to support 
the continuing developments in GPS positioning 
technology. These specifications will be re-issued as 
appendices to the EM 1110-1-1003, NAVSTAR GPS 
Surveying. The specifications are Appendix H, 
"Geodetic Quality" NAVSTAR Global Positioning 
System Survey Receivers and Related Equipment / 
Instrumentation; and Appendix I, Code Phase 
Differential NAVSTAR Global Positioning Survey 
Receivers and Related Equipment/Instru-mentation. 
The following reports were published in FY95: 
* EM 1110-2-1003, Hydrographic Surveying 
* EM 1110-1-1004, Deformation Monitoring and 
Control Surveying 
* EM 1110-1-1003, NAVSTAR Global Positioning 
System Surveying. 
45-7

THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER 
The Water Resources Support Center (WRSC) is a field 
operating agency under the staff supervision of the 
Director of Civil Works, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps 
of Engineers. The Center consists of the Institute for 
Water Resources, the Navigation Data Center, and support 
elements. It is located at the Humphreys Engineer 
Center, Alexandria, Virginia, with satellite elements at 
other locations, including the Hydrologic Engineering 
Center at Davis, California; and the Waterborne Commerce 
Statistics Center, part of the Navigation Data 
Center, in New Orleans, Louisiana. The accomplishments 
of WRSC during FY95 are listed by division. 
HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER 
The mission of the Hydrologic Engineering Center 
(HEC) is to support the Corps and the Nation in its water 
resources management responsibilities. This is accomplished 
through research, training, and technical assistance 
programs in hydrologic engineering and planning 
analysis. HEC makes every effort to be aware of the 
present needs and upcoming problems of the water 
resource community. HEC maintains continuous dialogue 
with universities, private industry, other Federal 
agencies, and state andlocal governments to keep abreast 
of the latest developments. 
In FY95, HEC emphasized the development of our 
new generation hydrologic engineering software; upgrading 
and initiating selected guidance documents; 
product development under the real-time water control 
research project; and support for implementation ofriskbased 
analysis methods and tools. Special projects 
receiving emphasis include Mississippi main-stem 
forecastmodel, and Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa, 
Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint (ACT/ACF) system 
surface water and water quality modeling. 
HEC completed a major milestone for our NexGen 
software development project, an initial five-year effort 
that is developing successor software packages to the 
existing family of HEC batch computer programs. Version 
1.0 of the River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) was 
released in August to the Corps, other Federal agencies, 
state and local government, private consultants, and 
members of the international community. This maiden 
release version is a Windows 3.1 application. Work is 
now underway to port the program to the multi-platform 
environment, complete the steady flow features, and add 
the next major capability - unsteady flow. The first beta 
release of the Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) 
is scheduled for early 1996 with the maiden version due 
out later in the year. The Galaxy development system, 
by Visix Corporation, was adopted as the multi-platform 
graphical user interface (GUI) development system for 
HEC programs. The HEC-HMS beta GUI is being 
developed with the Galaxy system. Later HEC-RAS 
releases will likewise be multi-platform via the Galaxy 
system. A multi-platform graphics system was adopted 
and will be the basis for the higher-level graphics in HEC 
programs. While the next-generation software is the 
priority, HEC continues to actively support and have 
made selected enhancements to the mature versions of 
our major batch programs HEC-1, HEC-2, HEC-5, HEC- 
5Q, HEC-6, HEC-UNET, HEC-FDA, HEC-IFH, and 
several others. 
The hydrologic engineering guidance update project, 
while substantially reduced in scope, continues to be a 
priority project. HEC completed a major update of the 
Engineer Regulation addressing risk-based analysis for 
flood studies and made substantial progress on three 
newproducts: H&H applications of GIS, hydrologic impact 
of wetlands, and development of a consolidated 
H&H guidance notebook. The few remaining products 
from the major project ending last year were completed. 
For this six-year project, HEC prepared eight Engineer 
Manuals, ten Engineer Regulations, seven Engineer 
Pamphlets, and six Engineer Technical Letters for a 
total of 31 major new engineer technical guidance documents. 
We were assisted by field office staff, University 
Intergovernmental Personnel Agreements (IPA), and 
private contractors. 
HEC is assistingwith the development of a main-stem 
Mississippi River real time stage forecasting model. The 
model extends from St. Paul on the upper Mississippi, 
from Cincinnati on the Ohio, from Gavin's Point on the 
Missouri, down to the Gulf of Mexico. The objective is to 
assemble data for and calibrate the unsteady flow model 
UNET, adapt the model to real-time forecasting, and 
integrate the model into the real-time data system. 
Activities this year included assembling, calibrating, 
and testing preliminary forecast models. Even in its 
uncompleted state, it was successfully used this past 
year. Emphasis this next year will be on integrating the 
UNET forecasting model into the water control data 
system, improving the user interface and graphics, and 
performing further calibrations. 
HEC support to implement risk-based analysis for 
flood damage reduction studies has been intensive. In 
the past three years, seven PROSPECT courses, ten field 
location workshops, seven executive sessions, and ten 
field project working sessions were held for over 1,000 
Corps professionals. Two PROSPECT courses will be 
presented in FY96. Development of the software package 
that will replace the interim Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet 
is progressing rapidly, with a beta release scheduled for 
the coming winter and maiden release in the summer. 
The new software package is a fully integrated, flood 
damage analysis package that incorporates state-of-theart 
risk and uncertainty analysis algorithms. 
Ten PROSPECT courses were conducted for a total of 
11 weeks of training. The courses covered a variety of 
hydrologic engineering and planning analysis topics. 
Attendance averaged about 30 students per course. Ten 
on-site workshops were also held totaling seven weeks of 
46-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
sessions. Topics presented included Risk-based Analysis 
(2 sessions), Advanced HEC-2 (3 sessions), HECDSS, 
Flood Damage Analysis, Groundwater, and Statistical 
Methods. 
The real-time R&D project hit full stride in this, its 
second year, of a planned six year project. A summary of 
the overall project, status and future plans was published 
in "Water Control Data System (WCDS) Past, 
Present and Future" dated September 1995. A spatial 
visualization graphics product for real-time data display 
was released for field test applications. Working sessions 
involving field office staff addressed workstation 
implementation issues, intra- and inter-office data exchange, 
forecasting with NEXRAD data, and database 
management systems. A basic flood forecasting package 
that uses data from NEXRAD radar sites is now being 
field tested. Good progress was made on preliminary 
design of an Oracle-based water control database system, 
and data exchange technology. 
Reimbursable project work was undertaken for 20 
Corps offices including districts, divisions, headquarters, 
and R&D laboratories. HEC has increased its 
commitment to the ACT/ACF modeling. The total reimbursable 
program was $554,000 with individual projects 
ranging from a few thousand dollars to over $150,000. 
Projects include watershed and reservoir system modeling, 
water quality, risk-based analysis, interior flooding, 
urban hydrology, wetlands hydrology, water control software 
development, and groundwater modeling. 
The planned program for FY96 will include the reduced-
scope guidance update activities. HEC plans to 
release the maiden version of the NexGen products 
HEC-HMS and HEC-FDA, software designed for 
catchment runoff and flood damage analysis on engineering 
desktop computers. A revised release of HECRAS 
is also planned. Training activities will be down to 
seven courses totaling eight weeks. R&D is reduced with 
Congress terminating the real-time water control R&D 
project. Alternative support for WCDS modernization is 
being formulated. As a consequence of the R&D funding 
reduction, technical assistance will increase. Overall 
program emphasis will be about the same with some 
decrease in document preparation and increase in technical 
method and software development work. 
INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES 
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH 
DIVISION 
The Technical Analysis and Research Division responds 
to water planning research needs of the field 
offices, as well as unique projects assigned by the Office 
of the Chief of Engineers. At the same time, technical 
assistance is provided to Corps field divisions and districts. 
Engineers and scientists in the division apply 
specialized knowledge in fields such as economics, environmental 
science, geography, and engineering to develop 
and conduct a broad range of research aimed at 
producing practical and effective planning and management 
tools. Research outputs are applied to water 
resources activities throughout the Corps. 
During FY95, the Technical Analysis and Research 
Division conducted research andprovided technical assistance 
in the areas of benefit-cost techniques, environmental 
restoration evaluation, risk analysis, and planning 
methodologies. Work was initiated to develop alternative 
techniques for evaluating non-structural flood 
control measures. A comprehensive water resources planning 
manual was also started. 
The Evaluation of Environmental Investments Research 
Program focused on developing evaluation methodologies 
for planning environmental restoration projects. 
Several case studies with Corps field offices were initiated 
to develop techniques for environmental evaluation. 
Also, work continued to refine guidelines and 
develop personal computer needed software for incremental 
cost analysis for environmental projects. The 
software and guidelines serve as a basis for generic 
guidance for evaluating contributions to fish and wildlife 
habitat. A course in environmental evaluation was 
developed and conducted for Corps field planners. 
Other activities of the division were provision of technical 
assistance and training to a number of field offices 
to implement risk analysis in major rehabilitation, study 
flood damage prevention, coastal protection, and navigation 
projects. 
POLICY AND SPECIAL STUDIES DIVISION 
The Policy and Special Studies Division carries out its 
mission in support of the Director of Civil Works by 
conducting policy analysis planning and studies of national 
and regional scope. Since the early 1980s, the 
program has contributed to the development of numerous 
policies and programmatic initiatives within the 
Civil Works Directorate. The program continues to serve 
the Corps by assessing and evaluating changing national 
water and natural resources uses andmanagement and 
related public works infrastructure management needs 
as they affect Corps Civil Works missions, policies, 
practices, legislative mandates, and executive directives. 
During 1995, the Division completed 15 policy 
studies and two national studies, continued work on two 
new national studies, and played leading roles in two 
White House Task Forces on Wetlands and Ecosystem 
Restoration. Some ofthe more noteworthy recentprojects 
focused on developing interagency guidelines for wetlands 
mitigation banking and an analysis of new policies 
46-2

THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER 
for navigation dredging and dredged material disposal 
responsibilities. 
In addition, the Policy and Special Studies Division 
supports the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the 
Army (Civil Works) in formulating an agenda of emerging 
issues and by detailing staff personnel who work on 
special projects in the Assistant Secretary's office. 
Major activities conducted during 1995 included the 
following programs and projects: 
* Nation's Harbors Policy Study (Section 216, Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992) 
* National Study of Wetland Mitigation Banking 
* Shoreline Protection and Beach Erosion Control Study 
(for the Office of Management and Budget) 
* Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa and Apalachicola- 
Chattahoochee-Flint Comprehensive River Basin 
Study 
* Risk Based Design Standards in Environmental Restoration 
* Economic Impacts of Climate Change Research Program 
* White House Task Force on Wetland Mitigation Banking 
* White House Task Force on Ecosystem Management 
* Global Change Program 
* Watershed Planning Principles 
* Upper Mississippi River Flood Assessment: Wetlands 
Storage 
* Water Supply Handbook 
The National Study of Water Management During 
Drought and the National Infrastructure Strategy were 
completed and a report to Congress was submitted in 
1995. 
During the year permanent staffpersonnel were joined 
by visiting scholars from 10 of the leading universities in 
the country. Visiting scholars work full time in the 
Division offices or visit from time to time during their 
appointments. They contribute to a large number of 
policy and special studies and upon their return to 
teaching, their academic programs are enriched by exposure 
to information they learn while working for the 
Corps. Overall, the Division staff and visiting scholars 
have a significant influence on the state of current 
knowledge, and over 100 papers were presented at various 
workshops and conferences and nearly 24 were 
published in peer-reviewed journals. 
NAVIGATION ANALYSIS DIVISION 
The Navigation Analysis Division provides support to 
the Corps Civil Works Directorate and field divisions and 
districts for project-specific and system studies of navigation 
improvements. In this regard, it also performs 
recurring national-level analyses such as the update of 
vessel operating costs for inland and deep draft waterways, 
the development of coastal harbor and inland 
segment traffic and fleet forecasts, and analysis of the 
recovery of navigation costs. Italso provides support for 
the Inland Waterways Users Board (IWUB) and performs 
national and special studies as directed by the 
Director of Civil Works. Ongoing studies include the 
National Dredging Needs Study (Section 402 of the 
WRDA of 1992) and program management support to the 
Construction, Operations, and Readiness Division on the 
Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Program Plan of 
Improvement. Ongoing special studies address a variety 
of subjects where expertise in economic analysis is required, 
and range from assessment of transportation 
infrastructure to identification of regional economic impacts. 
Contining Support Activities. The foundation for 
evaluation of navigation projects, both inland waterway 
and deep draft harbors, is the comparison of transportation 
costs with and without proposed improvements. The 
division maintains and annually updates data on ocean 
and inland water vessel operating costs, the dimensions 
of these vessels, the distribution of ocean vessel sizes in 
the world fleet, and the configuration of barge tows on 
inland waterways. 
Coordination of Navigation Studies. The Inland 
Waterways Users Board, created by the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986, is charged with advising Congress 
on priorities for improving inland waterways. To 
provide information desired by the Board and by the 
Corps, the division performs ongoing analysis of the 
Inland Waterway Trust Fund which incorporates the 
CECW and IWUB priority evaluations of inland navigation 
projects in accordance with the budget constraints 
imposed by the Trust Fund. 
PROGRAM ANALYSIS DIVISION 
The Program Analysis Division (PAD) performs program 
analysis and evaluation studies to support the 
improvement of the execution of the Civil Works (CW) 
program, develops analytical tools to assist management 
and budgeting decision making, and performs other 
analyses to assist the effective management of the CW 
program. The division provides an analytical support 
base and infrastructure outside the day-to-day press of 
headquarters' activities in order to enable programmatic 
issues to be addressed comprehensively and systematically. 
Working with headquarters clients, PAD project 
managers collect, analyze and assess data on Civil Works 
program performance, structure information to assist 
decision making, manage task forces, and develop program 
management tools and processes. During FY95, 
the primary clients of the division were Programs Management 
Division; Operations, Construction and Readiness 
Division; and Planning Division. 
Representative projects include the following efforts: 
-O&M Performance Measures: In support of the 
O&M Performance Improvement Program, PAD is 
validating and refining O&M performance measures 
for use in charting progress toward O&M effectiveness 
and efficiency goals. The project supports the official 
pilot project being performed as part of the implementation 
of the Government Performance and Results 
Act of 1993. 
46-3

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
-CW Performance Measures: Building on the O&M 
Performance Measures project, PAD is managing the 
development of outcome-based performance measures 
for the CW program. The project proponent is Programs 
Management Division, but the process involves 
theparticipation of all CW divisions, as well as the 
Secretary's office. In FY95 the initiative conducted a 
series of national leadership meetings to provide executive 
direction. In addition, workshops in each of 
the CW "business programs" were conducted to develop 
program performance measures for use in FY96. 
-QUADRANT O&M Budgeting Tool: A computer 
model has been developed under PAD direction to 
prioritize navigation and hydropower maintenance 
projects on the basis of economic efficiency measures. 
In FY95, Navigation QUADRANT was successfully 
incorporated into the budget process. In addition, 
work on the beta version of the hydropower version of 
the model was also completed. 
-Native American Intergovernmental Relations 
Assessment: PAD managed the Native American 
Intergovernmental Task Force for the conduct of regional 
workshops with Native American tribes, and 
the preparation of an assessment of the current state 
of interaction between the Corps of Engineers and 
Federally Recognized Tribes. The project responded 
to the request by Dr. Zirschky, Acting Assistant Secretary 
of the Army for Civil Workb, to conduct workshops 
with Native Americans to communicate the 
message that the Corps of Engineers is committed to 
listening to the concerns of Native Americans, and to 
demonstrate commitment to President Clinton's April 
29 1994 memorandum on "Government to Government 
Relations with Native Americans." In FY95, 19 
regional workshops were conducted. Representatives 
from 153 tribes participated. Utilizing information 
from these workshops, the task force completed its 
assessment report. The report provides a description 
of current Corps/Tribal intergovernmental relations, 
and makes recommendations for improving these relations. 
- Project Management Analytical Support: PAD 
continued its long association and involvement with 
project management through the completion of the 
Project Manager Career Development and Training 
Master Plan. A series of outputs were produced 
including the actual Army Civilian Training Education 
and Development System (ACTEDS) plan for 
project managers (PM), analysis of a survey of PMs, a 
PM course directory and a directory of PMs. In 
addition, in FY95 approval was received for the initiation 
ofthe Advancement of Project Management Techniques 
Research and Development Program. The 
Field Review Group was formed, work units developed, 
and budget secured for program initiation in 
FY96. 
- Sponsors' Partnership Kit: PAD managed the development 
effort for a publication to acquaint potential 
sponsors of Corps CW projects with Corps procedures, 
and with roles and responsibilities of the Corps 
and sponsors. 
- Survey of Corps Ranger and Natural Resources 
Management Workforce: A survey of over 1,700 
Natural Resources Management personnel was conducted 
for Operations, Construction and Readiness 
Division to gather views and perceptions on the safety 
and effectiveness of the Visitor Assistance Program. 
Survey results were used by a blue ribbon panel to 
make improvements in the Visitor Assistance Program. 
NAVIGATION DATA CENTER 
The Navigation Data Center's (NDC) mission is to 
collect and supply information on the U.S. Waterways 
and Ports. NDC directly supports not only the USACE 
navigation mission but navigation-related missions of 
other Federal and state agencies in its role as the 
Federal center ofexpertise on waterway and port information. 
The data and statistics available through the 
Center include: Use data -- commodity tonnage, vessel 
traffic, passenger traffic, ton-miles and lockages; physical 
facilities -- port and waterway facilities, vessels, and 
waterway network; and operation and performance data 
on dredging and locks. In FY95, NDC continued to 
address its long-term goal of reducing hard copy products 
by investigating and implementing broader electronic 
product enhancements -easy to understand tables, 
graphs and charts; user friendly interfaces; Internet 
world wide web homepage with links to other navigation 
information; and the use of CD-ROM technology for data 
and complete reports. 
WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS 
CENTER (WCSC) 
The WCSC continued to develop and enhance its 
computer system to make it more user-friendly. The 
Enforcement Office emphasized increasing the amount 
of automated reporting by vessel operating companies. 
WCSC, in coordination with the Bureau of Transportation 
Statistics, released the first CD-ROM entitled"United 
States Waterway Data" this fiscal year. The CD-ROM is 
a collection of data from several agencies and institutions 
including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Navigation 
Data Center, the U.S. Bureau of Census, U.S. 
Coast Guard, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and 
Vanderbilt University. The type of information found on 
the CD-ROM include waterborne commerce statistics, 
lock performance monitoring system data, port facilities, 
dredging, domestic and foreign vessel information, and 
U. S. Coast Guard "incidents" (spills, collisions, fires, 
46-4

THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER 
casualties). The WCSC also developed quarterly tonnage 
estimates for major waterways by commodity and 
a monthly indicator for internal traffic on U.S. waterways. 
Both of these products are available on the NDC 
bulletin board, as well as on NDC's "Home Page" on the 
Internet. The monthly indicator of internal traffic was 
also chosen for regular publication in "TheWaterways 
Journal." 
PORTS AND WATERWAYS 
In FY95, five reports, covering 50 ports, were completed 
and are available: Number 39-Ports of Southwest 
and Western Alaska; Number 46 - Port of Chicago, IL; 
Number 48- Port of Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Ports on 
Lake Michigan; Number 65- Ports on the Illinois Waterway, 
IL; and Number 69- Port of Minneapolis-St. Paul, 
MN, and Ports on Upper Mississippi River. In addition 
to the above mentioned, Port Series "Pier, Wharf and 
Dock" data has been entered into the Ports Database for 
five reports covering 25 ports: Number 6 - Albany and 
Ports on the Hudson River, NY; Number 17- Tampa and 
Port Manatee, FL; Number 23 - Galveston and Texas 
City, TX; Number 38 - Southeast Alaska (Metlaktla, 
Ketchikan, Hollis, Thorne Bay, Hydaburg, Craig, 
Klawock, Wrangell, Petersburg, Kake, Juneau, Angoon, 
Haines, Skagway, Sitka, Pelican, Gustavus, Hoonah, 
and Yakutat); and Number 45- Detroit and Ports on the 
Saginaw River, MI. 
Utilizing the principles of Business Process 
Reengineering (BPR), the Ports and Waterways Division 
conducted a review of its current practice in collecting, 
processing, and disseminating information on the nation's 
commercial ports and navigable waterways. As a result 
of this effort, the Ports and Waterways Division has 
begun the process to redefine and reengineer the Ports 
and Waterways Information Management System 
(PWIMS) with the goal of improved data flow, integration 
with the Corps Command Data Model to facilitate 
Corps data sharing, and process improvement regarding 
Corporate Information Management (CIM) initiatives. 
The improvements will enable the Ports and Waterways 
Division to better meet the data needs of allCorps, 
Federal and private users. 
LOCK PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM 
(LPMS) 
The LPMS enhanced its distribution media via the 
Internet to include lock characteristics data and monthly 
updates of national key indicator locks around the country. 
This now provides instantaneous public access to 
the LPMS and lock. physical characteristics data. A 
complete Corps users review of the data and system 
requirements was initiated in FY95 and will be completed 
in FY96. A major focus will be to insure that 
LPMS will support the O&M results oriented management 
and performance measurements. 
DREDGING STATISTICS PROGRAM 
The Dredging Statistics Program responded to user 
requests for additional data and improved data entry 
capabilities with the implementation and distribution of 
version 2.0 of the Dredging Information System. Data 
entry personnel attended hands-on instructional workshops 
with a noticeable improvement of data quality, 
completeness and timeliness. The database tracks all 
Corps contracted dredging from initial pre-bid through 
final execution and this year now includes all Corps 
performed dredging. This data is available as baseline 
and performance data in the O&M Performance Measurement 
initiatives. Also in FY 95 the Navigation Data 
Center's homepage on the World Wide Web was expanded 
to include monthly updated dredging reports. 
The database has become a reliable central information 
source of all Corps of Engineers dredging activity. 
THE WASHINGTON LEVEL REVIEW CENTER 
The mission of the Washington Level Review Center 
(WLRC) was to review feasibility reports, major rehabilitation 
reports, general and limited reevaluation reports, 
continuing authority reports, and other decision documents 
that the Director of Civil Works may request. 
These reports address proposed water resource developments 
involving deep-draft harbors, inland navigation, 
flood damage reduction, fish and wildlife restoration and 
mitigation, hydroelectric power, water supply, hurricane 
and storm damage protection, and other related water 
resource needs. In addition to reviewing reports, during 
FY94 WLRC: 
a. Managed the concurrent Washington level review 
process for feasibility reports in which projects have 
been recommended for Corps implementation. 
b. Coordinated feasibility report review comments from 
Washington echelons and provided information to 
assist the Chief of Engineers, the Assistant Secretary 
ofthe Army for Civil Works, and the Office of Management 
and Budget. 
c. Monitored and tracked the review and processing of 
feasibility reports recommending Corps action beginning 
with issuance of the division commander's public 
notice through project authorization. 
d. Transmitted feasibility reports to states and Federal 
agencies for a 90-day review and comment period. 
e. Conducted professional training in water resources 
planning and project management as directed by the 
Chief of Engineers. 
46-5

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
WLRC managed the comprehensive review of 18 feasibility 
reports recommending USACE action and 4 
major rehabilitation reports. Inaddition, WLRC staff 
reviewed and provided written documentation for 24 
design memoranda, 12 continuing authority reports, 20 
reevaluation reports, 6 feasibility reports recommending 
no USACE action, and 45 miscellaneous documents. 
Also, staff members reviewed draft reports in preparation 
for attendance at 20 conferences and completed 24 
follow-up actions. WLRC staff also reviewed 42 resolutions 
and Examiners Committee reports of the Foreign- 
Trade Zones Board for action by the Director, WRSC. 
The WLRC Education and Policy Division conducted 
the Planners and Project Managers (PPM) Program. 
This program is an 11-month internship for Corps water 
resource planners, project managers, and other technical 
personnel from various areas of expertise who exhibit 
exceptional promise and demonstrate potential for advancement 
to positions of greater responsibility. There 
were 13 participants who graduated from this program 
in June 1994, including 5 women. Instruction in the form 
of lectures, workshops, short courses, case studies, and 
field trips was presented by staff members of WLRC, 
IWR, MSC and district offices, and HQUSACE. A number 
of representatives from other government agencies 
and private consulting firms participated in the instruction. 
Also, PPMs were assigned to work at HQUSACE 
for 6 weeks, and they taught the Planners and Project 
Managers Orientation Course for 2 weeks in several 
Corps offices. 
As of 9 October 1994, the review mission and staff of 
the Washington Level Review Center were transferred 
to the Policy Review and Analysis Division, Directorate 
of Civil Works, with the Center's name changing to 
Policy Review Branch. 
46-6

PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NAVIGATION CONGRESS 
(PIANC) 
The Permanent International Association of Navigation 
Congresses (PIANC) is an international organization 
consisting of approximately 40 national members, 
with headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. It is a clearinghouse 
where technology and experiences relating to ocean 
and inland navigation improvements are exchanged 
among engineers, scientists, port operators, and marina 
and vessel owners, to name a few. Its objective, broadly 
stated, is to promote the worldwide progress of inland 
and maritime navigation through the exchange of technical 
information on port and waterway development. 
The objective of the Association is met by holding International 
Congresses and by publishing quarterly technical 
bulletins and special reports. Special reports are 
published as a result of international research teams, 
called working groups, made up of those national members 
interested in the particular subject under study. 
Examples include methods of treatment and disposal of 
dredged material, flexible revetments in the marine 
environment, an international survey of dry dock facilities 
and their characteristics, the wildlife habitat and 
port management standards for pleasure navigation 
waterways, and other various topics relating to port and 
waterway development. The organization also serves as 
an excellent source of identifying individual and corporate 
expertise throughout the world on PIANC-related 
subjects. Personal interchange of ideas and information 
also is promulgated by members attending the International 
Congresses held once every four years. 
The affairs of the Association are managed by a Permanent 
International Commission (PIC), composed of 
delegates who represent each member government. The 
number of delegates is determined by the size of the 
national membership, but may not exceed 11 per country.
The United States (U.S.) has been a member ofPIANC 
since 1902 and has since provided an annual appropriation 
for the support and maintenance of the organization. 
This includes an annual subvention to PIANC International 
and payment of the travel expenses of properly 
accredited national delegates (Commissioners) of the 
United States to meetings of the PIC and Congresses. 
Total annual appropriation for the U.S. Section, PIANC 
is currently $45,000, including the annual subvention of 
approximately $16,000 to PIANC International. 
The U.S. Section is administered by law, under the 
auspices of the Department of the Army (Corps of Engineers). 
It is located in the Water Resources Support 
Center, Casey Building, Humphreys Engineer Center. 
The U.S. Section is composed of both individual and 
corporate members who pay membership dues. Membership 
of the U.S. Section on September 30, 1995 totaled 
414, consisting of 340 individual members and 74 corporate 
members. 
The United States National Commission constitutes 
the governing body of the National Section. In 1995 the 
ex-officio offices of the U.S. National Commission were: 
Chairman (Dr. John H. Zirschky, Acting Assistant Secretary 
of the Army (CW)); President (MG Stanley Genega, 
Director of Civil Works); and Secretary (Mr. DuWayne 
Koch). 
During FY95, U.S. National Commissioners were: 
Mr. Charles F. Connors, Consultant; Dr. Tudor T. Davies, 
Director, Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency; Mr. Donald G. Waldon, Administrator, 
Tennessee Tombigbee Waterway Development 
Authority; Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, Director, 
George Washington/Louisiana State University (GW/ 
LSU) Ports and Waterways Institute; Mr. Charles F. 
Lehman, Vice President, AmericanCommercial Barge 
Line Company; Mr. John M. Pisani, Maritime Administration, 
U.S. Department of Transportation; Mr. Walter 
D. Ritchie, Chief Engineer, Port of Seattle; and Mr. R. 
Erik Stromberg, President, American Association of Port 
Authorities. 
The U.S. Section representatives to the Permanent 
Technical Committees I and II (PTCs), the Permanent 
Environmental Commission (PEC) and the Permanent 
Committee for Development Cooperation (PCDC), and 
active Working Groups of PTCs were as follows: 
International Commission on the Environment - Dr. 
Robert M. Engler, USACE WES. 
Permanent Committee for Development and Cooperation 
- Dr.Anatoly B. Hochstein, GW/LSU Ports and 
Waterways Institute. 
Permanent Technical Committee I (Inland Waterways 
and Ports) - Mr. Anson Eickhorst, Executive 
Assistant to the District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer 
District, St. Louis. 
Permanent Technical Committee II (Maritime Ports 
and Seaways)-- Mr. Thorndike Saville, Jr. (Retired) and 
Mr. Charles F. Connors, Consultant. 
Active Working Groups under PTC I were: 
Working Group 14, Inland Waterway Vessels and Pollution 
- Mr.Barry T. Dyer, American Commercial Barge 
Line Company. 
Working Group 16, Coasters - No U.S. representative. 
Working Group 17, Treatment and/or Disposal of Contaminated 
Dredged Material - Mr. Norman R. 
Francingues, Jr., USACE WES. 
Working Group 18, Advanced Control of Locks and Bridges 
- No U.S. representative. 
Working Group 19, Problems of Collisions Due to the 
Presence of Bridges - Mr. Michael A. Knott, Assistant 
Vice President, Greiner,Inc. 
Working Group 20, Standardization of Dimensions of 
Class Vb Navigation Canals - No U.S. representative. 
Active Working Groups under PTC II were: 
Working Group 18, Planning of Fishing Ports - Mr. 
Jorge E. Abramian, Taylor Engineering, Inc. 
Working Group 24, Movement of Moored Ships - Mr. 
Gary K. Greene, Gary Greene Consulting Engineers. 
Working Group 25, Coastal Instrumentation - No U.S. 
representative. 
Working Group 26, Means of Combating Oil Spills - No 
U.S. representative. 
Working Group 27, Artificial Islands - Dr. Ernst G. 
Frankel, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 
47-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
Working Group 28, Breakwaters with Vertical and Inclined 
Concrete Walls - No U.S. representative. 
Working Group 29, Recommendations for By-Pass Systems 
for Harbours on Sandy Coasts - Dr. Richard 
Weggel, Drexel University. 
Working Group 30, Dimensions of Channels and Fairways 
-A Practical Guide - No U.S. representative. 
Working Group 31, Life Cycle Management of Port 
Structures, The Effects of Degradation and Damage to 
Marine Structures of Different Types an Recommendations 
for Life Cycle Management, including Inspection, 
Maintenance, and Repair - Dr. Valery M. Buslovby and 
Mr. Charles F. Connors. 
Working Group 32, Port Facilities for High-Speed Ferries 
-- No. U.S. Representative. 
Special Commission for Sport and Pleasure Navigation 
(SPN) - Mr. John M. Nichol, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers 
(Retired). 
Active Working Groups under SPN were: 
Working Group 6, Use of Jetskis and Similar Personal 
Powered Craft on Controlled Waters - Mr. Roger F. 
Hagie, Director, Public Affairs, Kawasaki Motors Corporation. 
Working Group 7, Marine Sanitation Pumpouts - Mr. 
Edward F. McKiernan, President, SeaLand Technology, 
Inc. 
Active Working Groups under PEC were: 
Working Group 1, Management of Aquatic Disposal of 
Dredged Material -- Dr. Michael R. Palermo, USACE, 
WES. 
Working Group 2, Wildlife Habitat and Port Management 
-- Dr. Mary C. Landis, USACE, WES. 
Working Group 3, Glossary of Environmental Terms and 
Terminology as Related to PIANC Activities -- Mr. Thomas 
R. Pater, USACE, WES. 
47-2

CHAPTER 48 
SUPPORT FOR OTHER AGENCIES 
The Department of the Army, through the 
Corps of Engineers, provides assistance to non- 
Department of Defense (DOD) agencies under its 
Support for Others (SFO) Program. SFO 
programs and projects are categorized as either 
Environmental or Facilities/Infrastructure work. 
The Corps supports nearly 60 Federal agencies 
outside the DOD. This report describes work 
done during Fiscal Year FY 95 and projected or 
potential new work for FY 96 and beyond. 
I. POLICY AND PROCEDURES 
A. Under the SFO Program the Corps 
assists governmental (non-DOD) and other 
entities by providing them with quality 
engineering, environmental, construction 
management and related services. 
B. Our goal is to apply our capabilities to 
assist others in the execution of their missions, 
not to take away their work. Many agencies do 
not possess technical expertise to fulfill the inhouse 
engineering needs of their programs. 
Furthermore, many do not have the staff to 
effectively manage engineering or construction 
work being conducted by private firms under 
contract. The Corps can fill that void. The 
customers we support provide full funding for 
the effort, and retain control and legal 
responsibility for their program. The Corps 
executes within the terms of a given scope of 
work, agreed to between the agency and the 
Corps, helping to ensure timely project 
completion within budget. As Federal agencies 
downsize, the Corps SFO Program provides 
them the opportunity to consider outsourcing 
their engineering and construction management 
functions to the Corps. 
C. Supporting others enables the Corps to 
maintain and enhance our capabilities. The 
diversity of work allows us to apply our design 
and construction expertise in new and innovative 
ways. This serves to expand our skill base, thus 
strengthening our ability to carry out our 
traditional civil works and military roles. 
D. The Corps will not commit to support a 
customer without making certain that adequate 
resources and technical skills are available to 
ensure absolute customer satisfaction. 
E. The Corps negotiates interagency 
agreements or memoranda of agreement with the 
customer before starting work. Scope of work, 
lines of communication, reporting procedures, 
and identification of roles and responsibilities are 
but a few of the items included in these 
agreements. The need of our customer is the 
main focus we have in developing and tailoring 
the agreements. Additionally, there is no 
obligation under the agreements for our 
customers to provide work to the Corps. It is 
completely voluntary at the customer's 
discretion. This provides extra incentive for the 
Corps to provide quality service. 
F. One of our main goals is to conduct the 
SFO program in partnership, not in competition, 
with the private sector. We rely heavily on the 
talents of private firms to execute the SFO 
mission. While relying on the private sector for 
technical expertise, the Corps functions as an 
extension of the agency's staff providing Federal 
presence and government oversight to protect the 
taxpayers' interests. This capability can relieve 
the agency of the burden of hiring and training 
specialists to perform these functions. In this 
respect, the Corps offers proven Federal contract 
management experience and effectiveness to 
assist other agencies in the execution of their 
missions while saving them money and work 
force. 
G. The Corps has demonstrated its 
proficiency in engineering and construction 
management and in meeting today's complex 
environmental challenges. 
H. The Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) recognizes the value of the work 
performed by the Corps under the SFO program 
and supports the program by providing nearly 
1300 full-time equivalents (FTEs) specifically for 
this mission. 
I. Beginning in FY 96, the Corps will 
annually survey our customers to measure their 
satisfaction with the quality, costs, timeliness of 
our work and our responsiveness. 
48-1

II. CATEGORIES OF WORK 
Highlights of the Support for Others program for 
FY 95 and potential new work for the future 
follow. At the end of this report is a table that 
reflects projected workload for FY 96. The 
projects and programs cited in this report are all 
reimbursable efforts. 
A. ENVIRONMENTAL 
PROTECTION/ RESTORATION 
1. Established Missions: 
Department of Agriculture 
Consolidated Farm Service Agency 
(CFSA -- formerly FmHA). The Corps 
provides nationwide environmental support to 
CFSA. Remedial actions included preliminary 
assessment screening, tank removals, 
contaminated soil removal, and removal or 
disposal of hazardous wastes and debris. Total 
value of work performed in FY 95 was $1.8 
million. 
Department of Commerce 
Economic Development Administration 
(EDA). The Corps has supported EDA's 
environmental program since signing an 
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) in 1991. 
The work entails a full range of environmental 
restoration activities at properties EDA acquires 
when private sector parties default on 
government-guaranteed loans after having used 
the properties as collateral. Work accomplished 
in FY 95 was $2.7 million. 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration (NOA A). The Seattle 
District performed $4.1 milliion of environmental 
work for NOAA Western Region in FY 95. 
Work included environmental compliance audits, 
preliminary assessments, remedial investigations, 
remedial design and removal actions. 
Department of Energy (DOE). 
At former production plants for nuclear weapons 
and at other DOE sites contaminated by 
radioactive and other hazardous wastes, the 
Corps provides a wide range of environmental 
assistance under a 1990 Interagency Agreement 
with DOE. The work entails site studies, 
planning, engineering, design, construction 
management services, and related activities at 42 
DOE locations. Related activities include 
estimating costs, acquiring permits, developing 
work plans, conducting environmental studies, 
designing and constructing remediation and 
waste management projects, and/or reviewing 
plans and reports prepared by others. Work 
accomplished in support of DOE environmental 
programs in FY 95 was $46 million. The 
following examples depict how the Corps has 
efficiently used scarce resources to accomplish 
mission success: 
* Hanford. The Corps prepared the first 
Record of Decision ever approved by the 
Environmental Protection Agency for cleanup at 
the Hanford Site. The Secretary of Energy cited 
this work as evidence of cleanup progress at 
Hanford. The Corps cleaned 46 per cent of the 
site area, 30 days ahead of schedule and $19.2 
million under the original DOE estimate. The 
Corps studied proposed response actions and 
identified numerous opportunities to save 
hundreds of millions of dollars, including 
streamlining overhead rates, eliminating 
proposed procedures not essential for compliance 
and instituting fixed-price contracting. DOE is 
now implementing a number of the changes the 
Corps recommended. In FY 95, the Walla 
Walla District performed a wide range of 
environmental assistance to DOE including 
studies, planning, engineering, cost engineering, 
design and construction management services 
totaling about $18.2 million. However, due to 
budget cuts, DOE plans to provide only $2 
million for Corps support at Hanford in FY 96. 
* Ames Reactor Facility, IA. On a quick 
response action to remove low level radioactive 
material, the Corps completed the project ahead 
of schedule, spent less than half the budgeted 
amount, $60 million under the original DOEestimated 
life-cycle cost. The DOE Chicago 
Operations Office sent the Corps a letter of 
appreciation and is currently preparing an 
interagency agreement for the Corps to provide a 
wide range of environmental support. 
* Savannah River Site. The Charleston 
District provides support to DOE's Savannah 
River Site under the umbrella of the 
environmental restoration program. The work 
primarily supports infrastructure design and 
construction in support of the site environmental 
restoration. The District completed removal of 
48-2

coal ash at the D-Area steam generating station 
and began design of four highway bridges to 
bring them up to current standards. The District 
provides cost estimates, project management 
support, technical reviews, and construction 
surveillance support. Expenditures in FY 95 
were $6.7 million. 
* Morgantown Energy Technology 
Center (METC). The Corps is providing 
environmental support to METC at several sites. 
The Omaha District is performing 
characterizations, preparation of alternative 
studies and continuing long term monitoring 
programs at the Hoe Creek and Rock Springs, 
WY sites. Omaha District is executing four 
projects in FY 96 at an estimated cost of $2.1M. 
METC identified $1-3 million per year of work 
requiring Corps assistance for the next several 
years. 
* Real Estate Support. The Louisville 
District is providing all real estate support for the 
acquisition of land and interests in land for 
cleanup activities associated with contamination 
at Femrnald, Ohio; Miamisburg, Ohio; and Weldon 
Springs, Missouri. Corps expenditures for this 
support during FY 95 was $177,000. The 
Louisville District will also continue to provide 
real estate support in connection with the cleanup 
activities at the Fernald Environmental 
Management Project and the Mound Facility. 
Projected work for FY 96 is $175,000. 
Department of Health and Human 
Services 
Indian Health Service (IHS). The North 
Pacific Division is providing environmental 
support to IHS at 4 IHS clinics. The program 
includes environmental compliance work, tank 
testing and removal, petroleum-oil-lubricant 
(POL) contaminated soil removal, POL liquid 
removal and other hazardous toxic waste (HTW) 
cleanups. Work in FY 95 exceeded $1.4 million, 
and should continue at $1 million per year for the 
next several years. 
Department of Interior 
National Park Service (NPS). Work for 
the NPS includes site inspections, tank removal, 
tank testing, groundwater monitoring, fuel barge 
design, pipeline replacement, environmental 
compliance, occupational safety and health and 
other technical support at various sites. The 
Omaha District is assisting NPS at the Krejci 
Dump, OH project and the Cuyahoca National 
Recreation Area. South Pacific Division 
provided remedial action for the NPS at Mill 
Valley, CA. 
* El Morro Fortress, San Juan, PR. 
The Jacksonville District is continuing work in 
support of NPS to stabilize and preserve the El 
Morro Fortress in San Juan, Puerto Rico, one of 
the oldest fortifications in the Western 
Hemisphere. Value of the work on the fortress 
was approximately $3 million in FY 95. 
* Everglades National Park, FL. The 
Jacksonville District is supporting NPS through 
structural modifications to the existing water 
management systems at the Everglades National 
Park to improve natural water flows. The total 
estimated cost of this project is $108 million. 
US Fish and Wildlife Service. The Omaha 
District is providing technical support to the Crab 
Orchard National Wildlife Refuge, Marion IL on 
the Metal Operable Unit Contamination 
Delineations. 
Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The 
Omaha District is performing Environmental 
Compliance Assessments under the Compliance 
Assessment- Safety, Health & the Environment 
Program (CASHE) at various BLM sites. 
Department of Justice 
Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The Fort Worth 
District is supporting the BOP by providing 
technical services in hazardous waste and 
asbestos abatement. Work completed in FY 95 
totaled about $200,000. 
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). 
The Omaha District provided assistance to the 
FBI on two projects during FY 95; Fuel Spill, 
Pocatello, ID included recovery of the fuel 
product from the groundwater, and a final 
capping of a waste site at Clarksburg, WV. 
Workload for FY 95 was $500,000. 
Immigration and Naturalization Service 
(INS). The Corps is providing environmental 
support to INS at several locations. Work in FY 
95 exceeded $1.3 million. FY 96 workload is 
estimated to be $6.8 million. 
Department of Transportation 
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 
Since 1993, the Corps has supported FAA by 
48-3

providing environmental assistance. The FAA 
program office has written that it relies on the 
Corps as the "cornerstone" for their restoration 
mission. The work entails removing and 
replacing underground storage tanks and 
providing training for assessments for 
environmental compliance and occupational 
safety and health. Work accomplished in FY95 
was about $12.6 million. 
Department of Treasury 
Federal Law Enforcement Training 
Center (FLETC). In 1995, the Savannah 
District performed an Emergency Planning and 
Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA) 
inventory for FLETC in the amount of $160,000. 
Also, the District performed an opportunity 
assessment including multimedia compliance 
guide and hazardous waste management for 
$151,000. Other work included site 
investigations on firing range berms for 
$203,000, asbestos survey for $190,000, lead 
paint survey for $180,000, and soils 
investigation on new outdoor firing range for 
$30,000. Workload projection for FY 96 is 
$550,000. 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 
Superfund. Since 1982, the Corps has 
supported the Superfund program by conducting 
remedial designs and remedial actions 
(construction), both primarily by contract, for 
Superfund financed projects. The Corps 
performs reviews and prepares studies, and 
provides enforcement oversight as well as real 
estate, remote sensing, and geographical 
information systems support under this program. 
Work completed in FY 95 program totaled $322 
million. Following are a few examples of success 
stories for the Corps in managing Superfund 
sites: 
* Marathon Battery, NY, is a heavy metal 
site. Through innovations in sampling/testing, 
geostatistical modeling, and pilot treatability 
studies, the Corps reduced the project cost by 
$10 million, or one-third of the estimated cost. 
* At Fultz Landfill, OH, the Corps saved 
over $13 million of the estimated $19.5 million 
cost for remedial action through value 
engineering. 
* Mobile District assisted EPA in the emergency 
relocation of four families and a business during 
a cleanup at a project site in Leeds, Alabama. 
Mobile District is also negotiating with EPA for 
Corps assistance in relocating families from the 
Escambia Treating Company and Argico 
Chemical Company Superfund sites in 
Pensacola, Florida. 
Wetlands Restoration. The Omaha District is 
assisting EPA by identifying and designing 
restoration for Missouri River floodplain 
wetlands. Site design was conducted in FY 95 
and final designs will be completed in FY 96. 
Other Programs. The Corps continues to 
support other EPA programs. These include the 
Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated 
Sediments program managed by the EPA Great 
Lakes National Program Office, Ocean Disposal 
Dump Site Monitoring, the Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 
program, and assistance for the Tijuana 
Interceptor/International Treatment Plant. Corps 
assistance to these programs was valued at about 
$5 million for FY 95. The Corps also provides 
support to EPA regions for technical assistance 
on the RCRA oversight. 
Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) 
Under a 1993 MOA, 31 Corps Districts are 
working on a nationwide program to bring all 
Emergency Broadcast Station (EBS) 
underground and above ground storage tanks 
into environmental compliance. Tanks, being 
removed at 361 sites, contain diesel fuel, 
gasoline, or propane; and some are replaced by 
above ground tanks. Work in FY 95 work 
totaled approximately $2.2 million. 
Small Business Administration (SBA) 
The Omaha District provided site assessment at 
the Albert City, IA, Safewell Site and will 
continue with technical review of remedial 
investigations, feasibility studies, preliminary 
assessments, site inspections and remedial design 
through FY 96. 
2. New or Potential Missions: 
Department of Energy 
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne 
IL. The Omaha District is negotiating with DOE 
48-4

for design and construction support on a Waste 
Water Treatment Plant starting in FY 96. 
Morgantown Energy Technology Center 
(ME TC). The Department of Energy has 
assigned METC responsibility for its 
Decontamination and Decommissioning 
Program. DOE has 12 nuclear weapons sites 
across the US which require various remedial 
work prior to being deactivated. The Huntington 
District is the point of contact for the Army in 
assisting METC with this work which should go 
well beyond the year 2000. Workload is 
expected to range between $2-15 million per year 
for the next several years. 
Department of Interior 
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA).; 
HQUSACE representatives met with 
Headquarters, BIA officials to discuss Corps 
design, construction, and environmental 
restoration capabilities. Possible types of 
support are environmental compliance audits, 
tank removals, and investigations. 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 
(USFWS). The Corps is performing time 
critical hazardous waste removal actions at two 
national wildlife refuges - one involves removal 
of dioxin contaminated soil from the Iroquois 
National Wildlife Refuge near Buffalo, NY and 
the other involves removal of soil and 
swampland material contaminated with asbestos 
and other refuse from the Great Swamp National 
Wildlife Refuge near Morristown, NJ. 
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The 
Topographic Engineering Center is using its high 
accuracy Differential Global Positioning System 
(DGPS) to support the USGS effort to accurately 
map key areas of South Florida. Another 
purpose of the effort will allow for the 
assessment of flood control structures and 
urbanization on the fragile South Florida 
ecosystem. 
Department of Justice 
Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The Fort Worth 
District is providing abatement for Asbestos 
Containing Material (ACM) and Lead Based 
Paint (LBD) at several BOP facilities. Workload 
for the next two years will exceed $2.4 million. 
Department of Transportation 
US Coast Guard (USCG). The South 
Pacific Division is performing site investigations 
and remedial assessments for the USCG. 
Workload is estimated at $100,000 for FY 96. 
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 
The FAA has requested the Corps provide Leadin-
Water and PCB testing at approximately 64 
sites throughout their Southwest Region. 
Department of Treasury 
Secret Service. In 1996 the Savannah District 
will be performing environmental compliance 
audits on Beltsville, MD facilities and preparing 
an Emergency Planning and Community Right to 
Know Act (EPCRA) chemical inventory reports 
for $140,000. 
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 
The Seattle District has entered negotiations with 
the VA to provide environmental compliance 
audit services for facilities in the Pacific 
Northwest. 
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)/ 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 
Government Applications Task Force 
(GATF). 
* Mojave Desert. In support of the CIA's 
Environmental Program for application of 
classified imagery assets, the Topographic 
Engineering Center (TEC) is developing a Desert 
Tortoise habitat model and plant community map 
for an area in the Mojave Desert. This GATF 
project is focused on the development of a 
Geographic Information System (GIS) for use in 
statistical modeling of the habitat of the 
threatened Desert Tortoise. TEC is working with 
the National Training Center, National Park 
Service, Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, Joshua Tree National Park, the 
University of Arizona and New Mexico State 
University. 
* Pacific Northwest. The Topographic 
Engineering Center is working with the EPA in 
supporting an effort to detect, monitor and assess 
the patterns of degradation to several 
Northwestern rivers' riparian zones that are 
indicators of water quality impairments. Based 
upon remotely sensed and GIS derived data, the 
areas that are suitable for riparian zone restoration 
48-5

are being identified. This task is also being 
coordinated with the US Forest Service, and the 
Pacific Northwest Research Station. 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 
Virginia Institute of Marine Science 
(VIMS). As part of a project funded by a grant 
to VIMS from EPA, the Topographic 
Engineering Center is assisting in the evaluatation 
of wetlands at Gloucester Point, VA using 
spectral reflectance data and narrow band 
imagery. 
National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) 
HQUSACE representatives met with 
Headquarters, NASA, and Goddard Space Flight 
Center officials to discuss Corps design, 
construction, and environmental restoration 
capabilities and the Corps unique contracting 
tools available to rapidly provide services to clean 
up the environment. Specific support services 
discussed were environmental compliance audits, 
remedial actions, and investigations. NASA 
representatives are interested in this type of 
support and they will review their requirements 
to determine how best they could use the Corps 
expertise. 
B. FACILITIES & 
INFRASTRUCTURE 
1. Established Missions: 
Department of Agriculture 
US Forest Service (USFS). Seattle District 
has supported the USFS with annual inspections 
and evaluation of natural debris dams at Castle 
and Coldwater Lakes, and tunnel inspection at 
Spirit Lake, since the Mt. St. Helens eruption. 
Design for the major repair of the Spirit Lake 
tunnel was completed in FY 95. Work should be 
completed in FY 96. The South Pacific Division 
provided $100,000 in road inspection services to 
USFS in FY 95. 
Natural Resources Conservation Service 
(NRCS) The Pittsburgh District is currently 
providing real estate services for a soil and crop 
testing station in Monroe and Summer Counties, 
West Virginia. The project should be complete in 
FY 96. The District is also performing a flood 
damage reduction study of the Kings Creek 
Watershed in West Virginia. The study will 
identify and quantify flood damages and 
investigate both structural and non-structural 
solutions in three areas within the basin. FY 95 
expenditures were $238,000. 
Department of Energy 
The Corps provides a wide variety of real estate, 
design and construction support for DOE 
weapons production and energy related facilities. 
Support to DOE is continuing at the Rocky Flats, 
CO and the Pantex, TX plants. Other Corps 
support to DOE includes: technical assistance to 
the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste 
Management (OCRWM) at Yucca Mountain, NV; 
a reconnaissance field study for proposed 
geothermal resource areas in Hawaii; and real 
estate assistance in transferring title documents 
from the states of Utah, Colorado, Texas, New 
Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania and Wyoming to 
the U.S. Government under the Uranium Mine 
Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRA). 
Facilities and infrastructure work accomplished 
in FY 95 for DOE (including that listed below) 
was valued at $22 million. 
Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). 
The ASA(CW) signed an MOA in October 1993, 
for the Corps to support BPA in the planning, 
design and construction of juvenile fish 
monitoring facilities at the Bonneville Lock and 
Dam in Oregon. The Pacific Northwest Electric 
Power Planning Council was directed in 16 USC 
839b(h) to develop and adopt a fish and wildlife 
conservation plan in connection with the 
Columbia River power system and authorizes 
BPA to fund fish and wildlife mitigation and 
enhancement measures. This project is expected 
to cost approximately $3.6 million for the design 
and $10-12 million for construction. The Corps 
is also doing a $1 million cultural resource study 
at various public facilities for the Bonneville 
Power Administration. 
Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center 
(PETC). The Pittsburgh District is currently 
working under an Interagency Agreement with 
DOE to provide project management and 
technical support as requested and tasked by the 
Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center (PETC). 
This agreement was initiated in FY 94 and 
continues through FY 98. The following items 
of work will continue in FY 96: management 
and coordination of all work efforts in-house; 
48-6

facility modernization; review and assessment of 
hazardous substance plans; and recommendations 
to streamline PETC's environmental review 
process. In FY 95, $141,000 was expended in 
this program. FY 96 expenditures are expected 
to be $633,000. 
Department Of Housing and Urban 
Development (HUD). 
Under a 1994 amended agreement with HUD, 
inspection services were furnished by the Corps. 
Work consisted of periodic physical inspections, 
contract administration reviews, drawing and 
specification review and final inspections of 
HUD renovation contracts with local Public 
Housing Authorities. In addition, laboratory 
services (lead paint testing) were provided by the 
Division laboratories. 
Department Of Health and Human 
Services (HHS) 
Indian Health Service (IHS). The Omaha 
District provided technical support to the IHS in 
FY 95. This included a flood plain delineation 
study of Omaha Creek in Winnebega, NE 
Department of Interior 
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). For 
projects on selected BIA reservations, the Corps 
provides technical and environmental support. 
Work ranges from engineering services and 
construction management, to the preparation of 
Environmental Assessments and Impact 
Statements. One notable example is the 
Jacksonville District, who over the past twelve 
years has taken on several innovative water 
management programs with the Seminole Tribe 
of Florida. During this period, the District has 
developed a surface water management system 
and evaluated four pump stations for the 
Brighton Reservation. They have trained tribal 
members in aquatic plant management. The 
District recently completed a floodplain analysis 
for the Seminoles. The Tribe is also developing a 
water conservation plan and has requested Corps 
support. 
Bureau of Reclamation (BOR). The South 
Pacific Division performed dam inspections for 
BOR in FY 95 for $350,000. 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 
(USFWS). Baltimore District is providing 
contracting and construction management 
services in the construction of the FWS's training 
center in Shepherdstown, WV. This work is 
being done under an Interagency Agreement 
which was executed in January 1994. The multibuilding 
project is sited on 525 acres and 
includes classrooms, dormitories, dining, and 
day care facilities. The project was awarded in 
May 1994, for $76.2 million. FY 95 
construction placement was $30 million. Project 
estimate for FY 96 is $36 million. The Corps 
also continues support to the USFWS by 
providing assistance on numerous projects 
including engineering, construction, and real 
estate services. FY 95 workload was $3 million 
and expected FY 96 workload is $1 million. 
National Park Service (NPS). The 
Chicago District is currently working on a study 
of recreational opportunities on the Chicago 
River for the NPS. The St. Louis District has a 
small amount of ongoing orthophotographic 
mapping work for NPS as well. 
Office of Insular Affairs (OIA). 
* Infrastructure Operations and 
Maintenance Improvement Program, 
Pacific Islands. In support of OIA the Corps 
is managing a program to improve public works 
operations and maintenance of infrastructure in 
the Federated States of Micronesia, Republic of 
the Marshall Islands, Republic of Palau, America 
Samoa, Guam, Commonwealth of the Northern 
Mariana Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands. 
The program is focused on developing long term 
institutionalized improvements in partnership 
with each country. Areas being reviewed are 
administrative, budgeting, accounting, technical 
and organizational and recommendations involve 
the executive and legislative branches of 
government as well as the public. The Corps 
workload in support of this program in FY 95 
was $433,000. 
* Palau Compact Road Project. Under the 
terms of Section 212(a) of the Compact of Free 
Association effective 1 October 1994, the Corps 
will design and construct a 53 mile road system 
on Babelthuap Island, Republic of Palau. Based 
on a baseline estimate prepared on the road 
system, an agreement was reached on the project 
budget of $149 million. Major work items 
include preparation of a cost estimate for the 
compact road, planning and coordination, 
48-7

environmental and explosive ordnance work, 
including engineering and design and 
construction. Funds in the amount of $485,900 
were expended in FY 95. 
Department of Justice 
Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The South 
Pacific Division is performing sewage treatment 
plant maintenance and repair work for BOP. FY 
95 workload was $213.000. The Fort Worth 
District is providing survey, environmental, and 
other services to the BOP as the regional office 
moves into the former Carswell AFB, TX 
Hospital. The workload impacts are minor. 
Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). Fort 
Worth District provides planning, engineering, 
design, and construction services to the DEA, 
including designing the expansion of the El Paso 
Intelligence Center (estimated design cost of 
$450,000) and rehabilitation of a Chicago 
warehouse (estimated construction cost of $1 
million). 
Immigration and Naturalization Service 
(INS). The INS and the Corps signed a national 
agreement in October 1994 which formalized 
Corps assistance for engineering, design, 
environmental support and construction 
management. In FY 95, the Corps continued to 
provide design and construction support for new 
checkpoints and border patrol stations along the 
US/Mexican border. The Los Angeles and Fort 
Worth Districts awarded construction contracts 
for this work valued at approximately $6 million. 
Support to INS over the next three years may 
total $40-50 million, with work ranging from 
new border patrol stations to administration 
facilities, including the El Paso Services 
Processing Center and design of a Border Patrol 
Station at Del Rio, TX. The Galveston District 
will be providing design and construction 
management for a Barracks at Port Isabel for the 
housing of immigrants. The INS National 
Firearms Unit (NFU) renovation project is a 
cooperative effort between the Buffalo and 
Baltimore Districts. The Buffalo District is 
providing design management and NEPA 
compliance assistance while Baltimore assisted in 
construction contract negotiations and will 
provide construction oversight in FY 96. The 
Jacksonville District is preparing the design and 
will manage the construction of a new high 
security detention facility in Miami, FL. 
Construction is scheduled to start in June 1996 
and the value of construction is approximately $9 
million. The South Pacific Division is providing 
engineering, design and construction 
management services to the INS for dormitories 
and other facilities. All facilities work 
accomplished in FY 95 in support of INS was 
$14 million. 
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). 
In accordance with the provisions of an October 
1992 MOA with the FBI, the Corps provided onsite 
assistance in the construction of the FBI 
Criminal Justice Information Services Division in 
Clarksburg, WV. The construction was 
completed in FY 95. The Norfolk District is also 
providing acquisition assistance for the purchase 
of hardware and software development for a 
fingerprint imaging, processing and scanning 
system for this facility. Workload for FY 96 is 
expected to be approximately $17 million. 
Department of Transportation 
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 
Under an Army-DOT agreement signed in 1986, 
the Corps is providing support to the FAA. 
Current work includes construction supervision 
and administration of facilities (housing, flight 
service stations, tower construction) and airport 
physical security surveys and studies. Workload 
in FY 95 totaled about $3.5 million. The Corps 
is completing a seismic vulnerability evaluation 
study on 170 FAA control towers and associated 
buildings in seismic zones 4 and 5, primarily in 
the western United States. The study costs 
approximately $780,000 and the final report 
should be completed in FY 96. The Corps is 
also providing engineering and construction 
management services at Washington National 
Airport, Arlington, VA. 
Federal Highway Administration 
(FHwA). The Topographic Engineering Center 
provided global positioning systems (GPS) 
support to FHwA in evaluating the capabilities of 
potential alternative GPS systems and to 
determine the optimum system for meeting the 
requirements of Federal land, marine, aviation 
and space users. This task was completed in FY 
95. Corps workload for this effort was 
$283,000. 
US Maritime Administration (MARAD). 
The San Francisco District has been requested by 
MARAD to construct a pier extension to reduce 
rapid shoaling impacts. The purpose of the 
extension is to temporarily eliminate the need to 
dredge in order to accommodate vessel deliveries 
48-8

and to facilitate maintenance of the mothball fleet. 
Expenditures in FY 95 were approximately 
$3.4M. Expected expenditures in FY 96 are 
estimated at $1.2 million. 
US Coast Guard (USCG). North Pacific 
Division Districts performed $700,000 worth of 
infrastructure support for the USCG in FY 95. 
Projects included building renovations, a pier 
and wave abatement work at Port Angeles, WA. 
The Jacksonville District performed ongoing 
maintenance dredging in Florida for the Coast 
Guard. FY 95 workload was $700,000. 
Department of Treasury 
Infernal Revenue Service (IRS). The 
Corps is providing design and construction 
management services for the IRS at Andover, 
MA; Holtsville, NY and Covington, KY. The FY 
95 workload was about $1 million. 
Department of Veterans Affairs 
Tripler Medical Center and National 
Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific, Oahu. 
Pacific Ocean Division is executing the design 
and construction of 2 facilities and 3 building 
renovations that are part of the new VA Hospital 
facility construction at Tripler Medical Center. 
Other projects include installation of irrigation 
systems and road/curb repairs at the National 
Cemetery of the Pacific. Funds in the amount of 
$546,100 were expended in FY 95. 
Agency for International Development 
Mount Pinatubo, Philippines. The Pacific 
Ocean Division prepared a Recovery Action Plan 
(RAP) providing recommendations on actions 
required to reduce the damages caused by 
mudflows and to reduce the continuing flow of 
sediments into the streambeds and lowlands. 
This $6.5M project began in 1992. The RAP 
was completed in early 1995. Funds expended 
in FY 95 were $395,000. 
American Battle Monuments Commission 
(ABMC) 
Korean War Veterans Memorial. The 
Baltimore District completed this project in FY 
95. The Memorial was dedicated by President 
Clinton in July 1995. The value of FY 95 work 
was $8.1 million. 
Environmental Protection Agency 
EPA Facilities Management and Services 
Division. The Corps concluded negotiation of 
a national agreement which allows continued 
technical and contracting support to the EPA 
Facilities Management and Services Division. 
The Mobile District is the Program Manager for 
this work. The MOA became effective in 
February 1995 and includes design and 
construction management work on various small 
projects. The scope also includes quality 
assurance inspections. Approximately $3.5 
million were expended for these services in FY 
95. Work for FY 96 includes renovations to the 
EPA Laboratories in Deluth, MN; Gulf Breeze, 
FL; Montgomery, AL; and Narragansett, RI. 
Construction Grants Program. Under an 
agreement signed in 1980, the Corps has been 
providing construction oversight for EPA's 
Waste Water Treatment Construction Grants 
program. Though the program is slowly being 
phased out, there continues to be a need for 
Corps services in some locations. For example, 
in the City of Portland, OR, a recently awarded 
slough revitalization project for $18M has been 
transferred to the Corps for construction 
oversight Corps involvement in this program 
will likely last for several years as construction 
on projects already funded continues. The FY 95 
workload for the Corps was approximately $7 
million. 
Tijuana Interceptor International 
Treatment Plant, Mexico. The South 
Pacific Division is providing technical assistance 
to EPA for this project. FY 95 workload was 
$498,000. 
Eastern European Democracies. The 
Transatlantic Programs Center (formerly 
Transatlantic Division) delivered a Chlorination 
System and Ozonation System to Krakow, 
Poland in FY 95 in support of EPA. Installation 
will be completed by the end of FY 96. Total 
program value is $4 million. 
Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) 
Flood Insurance Studies. The Corps 
conducts Flood Insurance Studies and related 
technical work for FEMA in support of the 
National Flood Insurance Program. These 
studies include determinations of flood risks and 
insurance rate zones, base flood elevations and 
48-9

floodway and flood profiles. Besides Flood 
Insurance Studies, the Corps supports FEMA by 
conducting Hurricane Evacuation Studies for 
areas in Hawaii, the Gulf and Atlantic Coastal 
areas. The above two items resulted in a $3 
million workload in FY 95. 
Emergency Support. The Corps is the lead 
Federal agency for Emergency Support Function 
No. 3 - Public Works and Engineering, under the 
Federal Response Plan managed by FEMA. In 
this capacity, the Corps may be assigned 
missions such as debris clearance, emergency 
access, emergency water supply, emergency 
power, and temporary restoration of public 
facilities following any major disaster. For 
example, Jacksonville District was authorized 
over $143 million during FY 95 for recovery 
assistance associated with Hurricanes Marilyn 
and Opal (most of it late in the FY) and 
completed $11.6 million of this work in FY 95. 
South Pacific Division provided nearly $9 million 
worth of emergency support to FEMA as a result 
of California flooding in FY 95. 
National Emergency Training Center 
(NETC) Emmitsburg, MD is an existing 
campus where some buildings date from the early 
I 800s. The Baltimore District is providing 
continuing assistance including construction 
contracts oversight, design/build renovation of 
dormitories on the National Historic Register, 
and design management of additional facilities. 
The level of Corps FY 96 work is being 
negotiated. 
General Accounting Office (GAO) 
In accordance with the July 1992 MOA with 
GAO, the Corps, through the Baltimore District 
is providing design and construction assistance in 
the renovation of the 50 year old GAO Building 
in Washington, DC. GAO headquarters in 
Washington, D.C. The renovation is on-going, 
with completion scheduled in 2001. Cost to 
complete the renovation is expected to exceed 
$70 million. FY 95 volume of work was $1 1.7 
million. Projected FY 96 workload is $19 
million. 
(;eneral Services Administration (GSA) 
The Omaha District entered into a Memorandum 
of Agreement (MOA) with the GSA Regional 
office in Denver in March 1993 for assistance in 
preparing an environmental impact statement 
(EIS) for the construction of a National Oceanic 
and Atmospheric Administration building in 
Boulder, CO. Since the signing of the MOA, 
another Federal agency, National Institute of 
Standards and Technology (NIST) joined the EIS 
effort with additional work for the Corps. 
Preparation of the Draft EIS be continued into FY 
96. 
National Aeronautics 
Administration (NASA) 
and Space 
The Corps has historically provided design and 
construction support to NASA that has included 
construction of facilities at Cape Canaveral and 
more recently technical assistance in NASA's 
Advanced Solid Rocket Motor Manufacturing 
Facility at Yellow Creek, MS. The Pacific Ocean 
Division is supporting NASA in a number of 
repairs and modernization projects at the NASA 
Infrared Telescope Facility, located at the 13,000 
foot summit of Mauna Kea in Hawaii. 
National Science Foundation (NSF) 
By agreement with the NSF, the Corps' Cold 
Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory 
(CRREL) is providing technical support for 
Antarctic operations in the areas of construction 
and maintenance, including design of concepts 
and testing for snow and ice runways and roads; 
over snow transport; design of facilities and 
facility components including energy, water and 
waste systems; and the development of special 
purpose 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 
The Omaha District provides technical support 
for upgrading NRC requirements for protection 
of nuclear power plants from terrorist vehicle 
bombs. The Corps has developed technical 
manuals for use by the licensees to assist them in 
complying with NRC requirements. The Corps 
provides on-going site-specific technical 
consultation for the NRC staff. 
Panama Canal Commission 
The Mobile District has completed design of 
stoplogs for the Panama Canal. They have also 
been requested to provide technical support 
through the stoplog fabrication/construction 
period in FY 96. The District is also providing 
aerial photography and photographic mapping 
support and hydrologic surveying of the Canal's 
navigable waters. Workload for FY 96 is 
estimated at $200,000. 
48-10

U.S. Information Agency 
Since 1984, the Corps has provided construction 
and design services for the U.S. Information 
Agency. Work for the Voice of America work 
has taken place in the countries of Thailand, 
Morocco, Botswana, Kuwait, Sao Tome, and the 
Mariana Islands. The Corps Transatlantic 
Programs Center (TAC) has provided 
construction oversight for U.S. Information 
Agency security upgrade projects in several 
countries. 
Voice of America, Commonwealth of the 
Northern Mariana Islands. Pacific Ocean 
Division is preparing environmental 
documentation for construction of a transmitter 
station on Tinian in the Commonwealth of the 
Northern Mariana Islands. Funds in the amount 
of $1,473,000 were expended in FY 95, and the 
environmental assessment was completed in 
August 1995. 
State, Local and Territorial Governments 
The Corps provides support to State and Local 
governments also on a reimbursable basis. Some 
examples are: 
American Samoa. The Pacific Ocean Division 
is providing technical assistance in designing 
road repairs and associated shore protection and 
training of Samoan personnel to independently 
design and construct coastal structures. Design 
work was completed in June 1995 and the 
construction contract was awarded for $2M. 
Funds in the amount of $176,200 were expended 
in FY 95. 
Arkansas Electric Cooperative 
Corporation (AECC). The Little Rock 
District supported AECC by reviewing plans and 
specifications for hydropower plants at numerous 
sites. 
State of Hawaii, Kahului Wave Gaging 
Study. The State of Hawaii Department of 
Transportation provided $220,000 in Nov 92 for 
the Corps to install wave level gages in the 
vicinity of Kahului Harbor, Maui and provide 
analyzed directional and non-directional wave 
spectra and reduced wave parameters. Funds in 
the amount of $153,400 were expended in FY 
95. 
Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO. 
The Kansas City District designed the relocations 
48-11 
for streets and bridges related to the channel 
modification. 
Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO. The 
Kansas City District assisted with lighting, 
pumps and recirculation system, sidewalks, low 
dams and landscaping and design for an 
extension to the Brush Creek flood control 
project. 
New York City Department of 
Corrections (NYCDC). Under a 
Memorandum of Agreement, the New York 
District is designing the remedial shore protection 
work for approximately 2500 feet of an eroding 
embankment at Rikers Island. In FY 95, 
$250,000 was provided to accomplish the 
design. Work will be completed in FY 96. 
Cities of Portland and Eugene, OR. The 
Portland District entered into agreements with 
these cities for review of hydrology hydraulic 
engineering and photogrammatic mapping. 
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer 
Authority (PRASA). Jacksonville District is 
providing ongoing technical assistance to 
PRASA to alleviate chronic water shortages. 
This involves support in planning new reservoirs 
and a major aqueduct. FY 95 effort was 
$154,000. 
Puerto Rico Environmental Quality 
Board (EQB). Jacksonville District is 
providing technical assistance to Puerto Rico for 
their waste water system rehab and construction 
program. FY 95 workload was $865,000. 
Support To U.S. Private Firms 
Alden Research Laboratory. Under a 
Technical Assistance Agreement (TAA) with 
Alden Research Laboratory (authorized by the 
Water Resource Development Act (WRDA) of 
1990) the Corps developed a physical hydraulic 
model to analyze ice concerns at the Niagara 
Power Project Intake. This effort was completed 
in November 1995. 
Louis Berger International, Inc. Two 
TAA's have been executed with Louis Berger 
International, Inc. (LBII). The work includes 
improvement of navigation and signalization on 
the Paraguay-Parana River system in Latin 
America.

2. New and Potential Missions: 
Department of Commerce (DOC) 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration (NOAA). In July 1995, the 
Corps and NOAA signed a new national MOA 
that allows the Corps to provide support to 
NOAA. These services include engineering, 
design and construction management, 
hydrographic surveying, technology support, 
charting, research and development and other 
technical support. Activities will also include 
coordination of issues of mutual concern 
affecting coastal and ocean resources. NOAA 
may provide the Corps with tidal datum and 
technical support under the agreement. Also 
included in the agreement is support for the 
Corps newly developed SHOALS (Scanning 
Hydrographic Operational Airborne Lidar 
Surveying) system, which is flown on a NOAA 
helicopter. 
Department of Energy (DOE) 
Gas Pipeline Project, Los Alamos, NM. 
The Mobile District met with DOE and Bureau of 
Indian Affairs (BIA) representatives to discuss 
the possibility of the Corps providing assistance 
in the privatization of a 130-mile natural gas 
pipeline to Los Alamos, NM which crosses 
Native American properties. BIA has determined 
that there are 99 separate interest holders in the 
five properties involved. The Superintendent of 
the Navajo Area wanted Corps involvement 
because of our fairness in dealing with Native 
Americans. The project includes clearing title to 
the pipeline, preparation of the Request for 
Proposals and handling the details of the sale. 
Value of this project is $420,000. The District 
has agreed to assist in other disposals (land and 
waterlines) to the County of Los Alamos. FY 96 
value is expected to be $100,000. 
Actinide Facility, DOE Savannah River 
Site. The Charleston District has held 
discussions with DOE concerning the Corps 
providing support during the design and 
construction of a new actinide facility at 
Savannah River Site. Charleston District will 
o btain suppIort for this project from Mobile 
District and Huntsville Engineering Center. 
P'rojcct cost is estimatcd at greater than $100 
million. 
Morgantown Energy Technology Center 
(METC). The June 1995 MOA between the 
METC and the Department of the Army enables 
the Corps to provide engineering and 
construction support for the management of 
demonstration projects for advanced fossil fuels 
through the year 1999. The Huntington District 
is the Program Director for the Army for this 
work. Presently, the Huntington District is 
reviewing the status of design and construction 
activities for the DOE's Clean Coal Technology 
Program. METC is managing 16 projects 
throughout the US that require design and 
construction reviews through the year 2001. The 
Huntington District estimates FY 96 expenditures 
to be $125,000. 
Department of Health and Human 
Services (HHS) 
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 
The FDA and the Corps signed an interagency 
agreement on 7 April 1995 to provide real estate 
acquisition, design, engineering and management 
services for the consolidation of FDA's district 
laboratory and offices in the Los Angeles area. 
The value of the project is $40 million. The A-E 
has been selected and negotiations are underway. 
Site appraisal is complete and the FDA is 
purchasing a 10 acre site on the University of 
California at Irvine's (UCI) campus with closing 
scheduled for no later than September 1996. The 
Environmental Impact Statement Record of 
Decision is scheduled to be signed in July 1996. 
An archaeological site has been found on the 
property and the Los Angeles District is working 
with the State Historic Preservation Office to 
expose, document and mitigate the site. 
Department of Interior 
National Park Service (NPS) 
* Washington Sailing Marina and 
Columbia Island Marina. The Baltimore 
District has executed an agreement with the 
National Park Service to provide technical 
assistance for dredging at the Washington Sailing 
Marina and the Columbia Island Marina. 
* Fort Sumter National Monument. The 
Charleston District is negotiating with the NPS 
for the potential design and construction of a new 
tour boat dock to serve the Fort Sumter National 
Monument. Expected construction value is 
approximately $1.5 million. 
48-12

Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). The 
Jacksonville District is negotiating with the BIA 
to prepare flood evaluation studies for the 
Osceola and Seminole Tribes. Projected total 
cost is $250,000. HQ BIA representatives want 
the Corps to provide technical assistance in the 
review relicensing requests for hydropower dams 
that may impact Indian Reservations located on 
public lands. There may several hundred dams 
requiring this support over the next 5-10 years. 
BIA is awaiting FY 96 appropriations. 
Department of Justice 
Drug Enforcement Administration 
(DEA). The Fort Worth District is designing 
five DEA Laboratory facilities. San Francisco, 
San Diego, McLean, Washington, DC and Miami 
are the sites for the new labs. Design cost is 
$4.9 million and the value of construction is $50 
million. 
Department of Transportation 
U.S. Coast Guard. The New England 
Division is assisting the Coast Guard with the 
design and relocation of the Highland Lighthouse 
in Truro, MA. 
Department of Treasury 
Federal Law Enforcement Training 
Center (FLETC), Brunswick, GA. 
Projections of FY 96 work include air emissions 
inventory for $150,000, spill prevention control 
and counter-measure study on firing range berm 
for $125,000, water quality program for 
$150,000, and soils investigation for a building 
for $75,000. 
American Battle Monuments Commission 
(ABMC) 
The ABMC has selected the General Services 
Administration (GSA) as the lead agency to 
manage the design and construction of the 
proposed World War II Memorial. GSA is 
negotiating with the Baltimore District to provide 
design and construction support. The budget cost 
of this project is $100 million. 
John F. Kennedy Center for the 
Performing Arts (JFKC) 
The Baltimore District began providing technical 
assistance to the JFKC in mid-FY 95. An 
umbrella MOA was signed by the Acting 
48-13 
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) in 
November 1995 for the Corps to provide 
engineering, design, construction management 
and other technical support to the JFKC. This is 
a capital repair and restoration program planned 
over several years. In FY 95, five construction 
contracts were awarded. Work accomplished in 
FY 95 was $140,000. Projected workload for 
FY 96 is $13.5 million. Work for the entire 
program is estimated at over $70 million. 
National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) 
The Jacksonville District performed emergency 
dredging in the vicinity of the Canaveral Lock 
and Barge Canal, Canaveral Harbor, FL. NASA 
uses this channel for ships that recover the space 
shuttle's solid rocket boosters. Recent shoaling 
prevented NASA vessels from using the channel 
and the January shuttle would have been if 
postponed if the Corps did not dredge the 
channel. 
Panama Canal Commission. 
The Corps entered into an agreement with the 
Panama Canal Commission to perform an 
operation and maintenance study for the Panama 
Canal. The study will include documenting the 
current state of the canal's infrastructure; 
evaluating the present infrastructure maintenance 
program and assessing the current capital 
investment program and major maintenance 
projects; and providing recommendations as 
appropriate. The Corps study team consists of 
representatives from Pittsburgh, Huntington, 
Louisville and Mobile Districts with support from 
the Waterways Experimental Station. Pittsburgh 
District is the team leader. FY 95 expenditures 
were $61,000. The remaining work should be 
completed in FY 96 and is estimated at 
$644,000. 
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) 
The Huntington District is providing Lock 
Capacity Analyses for the Kentucky Lock and 
Upper Tennessee River Locks. The TVA has 
requested the Navigation Planning Center to 
perform capacity analyses for the Kentucky Lock 
to estimate the impact (i.e. delay reduction, cost 
savings) of operations currently underway at the 
lock. Additionally, TVA has requested capacity 
estimates for Pickwick and Chickamauga locks. 
Scope of work is being discussed. Estimated 
work in FY 96 is $50,000.

State, Local, & Territorial Governments 
Cullman, AL. The Mobile and Nashville 
Districts met with representatives from Cullman, 
AL to discuss Corps support in developing a 
water supply reservoir. Value of the project is 
$30M. 
Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The 
New England Division is supporting the 
Commonwealth of Massachusetts with design 
and construction of safety modifications at Old 
Quincy Reservoir, Braintree, MA. 
Columbus, OH. The Huntington District is 
providing support to the City of Columbus, OH 
on the Corps project, Flood Wall - West 
Columbus Local Protection Project. Work 
includes real estate acquisitions, design and 
construct relocated city-owned water, storm, and 
sewage facilities, gas lines, power, telephone, 
communication, and cable TV lines, construction 
of 3 sanitary lift stations and associated diversion 
pipes and gatewells. Total project cost is 
$111 M. The Corps total reimbursable 
expenditure for FY 95 was $1.2 million. Corps 
workload for FY 96 is also $1.2 milion. 
Martin Pena Canal, PR. The Jacksonville 
District is providing design and construction 
support to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to 
restore natural flows to the canal in urban San 
Juan. The Corps will receive $450,000 to begin 
design of the restoration effort. 
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority 
(PREPA). The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 
has requested Corps technical assistance in 
evaluating the safety of existing Commonwealth 
dams at Carraizo and La Plata. Estimated 
workload is $200,000. 
Other. The Huntington District is providing 
support to cities and private corporations 
involved in hydropower studies at Corps 
projects. Work is performed under 
Memorandums of Agreement as required by 
Article 306 and 308 of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission license and is fully 
reimbursed. Work includes technical studies. 
review of design and construction criteria for 
compliance with Corps regulations, review of 
plans and specification, construction oversight 
and general coordination with Licensee and other 
agencies. Work in FY 95 included work for: 
City of Jackson, OH (Belleville Lock and Dam); 
City of Summersville, WV and NOAH 
Corporation (Summersville Lake); Gallia Hydro 
Partners (Gallipolis Lock and Dam); and City of 
New Martinsville, WV (Willow Island Lock and 
Dam). Work accomplished in FY 95 was 
$192,000. Projected work for FY 96 is 
$557,000. 
Government of the Bahamas 
The Corps is providing flood control planning 
assistance to the Government of the Bahamas 
department of Public Works. First effort in FY 
96 is a $50,000 planning study of the Pinewood 
Gardens area of New Province Island. 
Tri-Cities Power Authority (Bluestone Lake); 
48-14

INVESTIGATION OF PROJECTS UNDER FEDERAL POWER ACT 
- This page intentionally left blank - 
49-1

REGULATORY, SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL & 
NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 
1. Regulatory Activities 
Authorities. The following authorities charge the 
Corps of Engineers with the regulation of various construction 
related activities in U. S. waters and wetlands: 
Sections 9 and 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899 
(structures in the alteration of waterways); Section 103 
ofthe Marine, Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act 
of 1972 (Ocean Dumping); and Section 404 of the Clean 
Water Act (discharge of dredged or fill material) 
Work Completed. During FY 1994, the Corps reviewed 
and authorized over 60,000 permit activities, 90 
percent of which were approved within 60 days. About 
8,200 projects were issued individual permits, and another 
55,000 activities were reviewed and approved 
under regional or nationwide general permits. General 
permits are issued to the public at large and define type 
of minor activities which do not usually require the 
extensive review necessary for projects authorized by 
individual permits. Use of general permits provides 
significant relief to the regulated public by avoiding red 
tape for small projects with minimal environmental 
impacts. In addition, many thousands of additional 
activities which did not require formal review were also 
authorized under general permits. The Corps denied 
only about 450 permits during FY 1994 since most 
projects which might otherwise have been denied a 
permit were either modified or conditioned to meet Corps 
requirements, scaled down to qualify for approval under 
general permits, or withdrawn. About 5,000 permit 
applications were either withdrawn or canceled. Under 
the regulatory program, the Corps made over 40,000 
jurisdiction determinations in FY 94, many of which 
were made in response to requests from landowners who 
where not applying for permits. The Corps investigates 
6,000 alleged illegal activities, most of which were violations 
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Under the 
permit program in FY 1994, the Corps allowed the filling 
of 17,200 acres of wetlands but required the restoration, 
enhancement, or creation of 38,000 wetland acres. 
In FY 1994, the Corps of Engineers signed a memoranda 
of agreement with the other Federal resource 
agencies regarding wetland delineations on agricultural 
lands. The agreement reduces impacts on farmers and 
minimizes duplication of effort among the Corps, the 
Environmental Protection Agency, the U. S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, and the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service (NRCS) which was formerly known as the 
Soil Conservation Service. The agreement establishes 
lead agencies for federal wetlands calls. The NRCS will 
have the lead for agricultural lands and the Corps will 
have the lead for non-agricultural lands. 
During FY 1994, the Corps began initial work to 
implement some aspects of the President's Wetlands 
Plan, announced in August 1993. The plan was designed 
to both improve protection of the nation's wetlands and 
to make the regulatory process easier and more fair for 
the regulated public. The Corps began work to review or 
develop regulations to expedite the review of permit 
applications; the President's plan provides that permit 
applications will be evaluated within 90 days from the 
date of the notice, unless otherwise precluded by law. 
The Corps continued work in FY 1994 to establish its 
Wetland Delineator Certification Program, designed to 
certify individuals as wetland delineation experts. The 
program will create a national pool of qualified nonfederal 
wetlands experts. 
TABLE A 
GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS 
Obligations 
Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 93 .......... $ 1,304,261 
Allotm ents .......................... .................. 92,000,000 
Total Funds Available ............................. 93,304,261 
O bligations .......................... ................. 92,087,107 
Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 93.......... $ 1,217,154 
Expenditures 
Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 93 ........... $ 3,760,096 
Allotm ent .............................................. 92,000,000 
Total Funds Available ............................. 
95,760,096 
Expenditures ......................................... 92,494,945 
Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 93 ........ $ 3,265,151 
2. Investigation and Removal of Sunken Vessels 
Under the authority of Sections 19 and 20 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1988, the Corps of Engineers 
investigated sunken vessels in navigable waters and 
removed those obstructing navigation. For obligation 
expenditures, see Table B 
TABLE B 
REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS 
Obligations 
Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 94 ......... $ 
Allotments ....................................... 
Total Funds Available ............................. 
Obligations ........................... . ........... 
Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 95 .......... $ 
Expenditures 
Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 94 ......... $ 
Allotment ......................... ..... ........... 
Total Funds Available ............................. 
Expenditures ........................................... 
Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 95 ......... $ 
3,388 
801,029 
804,417 
800,083 
4,334 
45,589 
801,029 
846,618 
816,153 
30,464 
50-1

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY O1F THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1995 
3. National Emergency Preparedness Activities 
Authority. Executive Order 12656, as amended, 
assigns responsibilities to executive departments and 
agencies in order to undertake the national emergency 
planning and preparedness activities necessary to develop 
an effective national capability to meet essential 
civilian and defense needs during major domestic crises 
and national security emergencies. 
Status. During FY 1994, the Corps of Engineers 
continued its effort to improve the command's readiness 
posture and its ability to respond to various national 
emergencies. Emphasis on those activities necessary for 
a successful transition from a "cold war" focus to preparedness 
associated with catastrophic natural disasters 
and adjusting Continuity of Government (COG) 
programs was continued. The primary focus during FY 
1994 was the preparation for catastrophic natural/technological 
disasters. Lessons learned from Midwest Floods 
of 1993, as well as those gleaned from events such as 
Hurricanes Hugo, Andrew and Iniki, Loma Prieta and 
Northridge Earthquakes and the evolving New Madrid 
Earthquake scenario, clearly indicate that, while the 
Federal Response Plan is a solid response system, it does 
not provide for response to disasters with national implications 
in a way that is sufficiently timely or comprehensive. 
The Corps has initiated a program that will use the 
deliberate planning process to develop scenario specific 
plans for catastrophic disasters. This should lead to a 
more timely and effective execution of Corps responsibilities 
during disasters that have national implications. 
Extensive coordination with Federal agencies and state 
and local governments will be incorporated into plan 
development. During FY 1994, the Corps also continued 
to refine the information already developed regarding 
Corps readiness roles and responsibilities for the 1990's 
(and into the 21st Century) and initiated the implementation 
phase of this effort. Other activities included a 
continuation of the planning for and maintenance of 
emergency facilities needed to support continuity of 
operations and coordination with the Federal Emergency 
Management in the development of a new Continuity 
of Government (COG) concept of operations. Executive 
Order 12656 has tasked the Corps of Engineers 
to be the lead Federal agency responsible for national 
emergency water planning. In this regard, an interagency 
working group has been established to set objectives 
and requirements. As the new COG concept is 
clarified, this group will be used to identify and implement 
appropriate emergency water programs/activities. 
For fiscal year obligations and expenditures, see Table C. 
TABLE C 
NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 
Obligations 
Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 93 ......... $ 
Appropriations FY 94 .............................. 
Total Funds Available ........................ $ 
Obligation .............................. .......... 
Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 94 ......... $ 
Expenditures 
Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 93 ......... $ 
Appropriations FY 93 .............................. 
Total Funds Available ........................ $ 
Expenditures ......................................... 
Unexpended Balance -30 Sep 94 ......... $ 
859,316 
7,000,000 
7,859,316 
6,805,323 
1,053,993 
1,561,043 
7,000,000 
8,561,043 
6,783,898 
1,777,145 
50-2

NATURAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY ACTIVITIES 
Authority. Public Law 84-99 provides the authority 
for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to provide 
emergency/disaster assistance for Flood Control and Coastal 
Emergencies (33 U.S.C. 701n) (69 Stat.186). Under this 
law the Chief of Engineers, acting for the Secretary of the 
Army, is authorized to undertake activities including disaster 
preparedness, advance measures, emergency operations 
(Flood Response and Post Flood Response), rehabilitation 
of flood control works threatened or destroyed by flood, 
protection or repair of federally authorized shore protective 
works threatened or damaged by coastal storm, and 
provisions of emergency water due to drought or 
contaminated source. Under Public Law 93-288, The 
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) (88 Stat.143) Act (The 
Stafford Act), the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
may direct USACE to utilize its resources to provide 
assistance in the event of a major disaster or emergency 
declaration by the President. Under The Stafford Act and 
the Federal Response Plan, USACE has a standing mission 
to provide assistance in the area of Public Works and 
Engineering, Emergency Support Function #3 for response 
to a major disaster or catastrophic event. 
Activities. Major disaster preparedness activities 
included: the review and updating of response plans to 
ensure viability, training personnel to ensure their capability 
to respond in adverse circumstances; procurement and prepositioning 
of critical equipment and supplies which would 
likely not be available during initial stages of a response; 
periodic exercises to test and evaluate plans, personnel and 
training, inspection of non-Federal flood control projects to 
ensure their viability to provide flood protection; and, the 
overall management of the response program to ensure a 
workable, coordinated effort is undertaken in a timely 
manner. In addition, work continued on response planning 
activities related to the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency's Federal Response Plan for providing engineering 
and constmation support following catastrophic events such 
as Hurricane Marilyn. [For each specific event, 
Headquarters augments its staff to manage the event 
concerning resource allocations (dollars and people) 
logistics of moving people and materials, funding 
contractors and materials and coordination with agencies 
involved ijp the event. These augmentation activities include 
overtime for Headquarters staff, travel to the event area, 
materials and supplies, increased staff from the field to 
include Individual Mobilization Augmentees (IMA), and 
Geographic Information System (GIS) services.] 
Significant Events. During FY 1995, the Corps 
continued, under Public Law (PL) 84-99, rehabilitation of 
levees damaged from the Midwest Flood of 1993 as well as 
the flood of 1995. This program involved a $272.5 million 
rehabilitation effort of 201 levees and is ongoing. 
Due to flooding events in January and March of 1995 
in California, under PL 93-288, the Stafford Act, the Corps 
actively support FEMA relieve and recovery efforts in 
debris clearance and remoyal, restoration of a flood control 
channel and Preliminary Damage Assessments. The dollar 
value of FEMA mission assignments exceeded $7.0 million. 
Under PL 84-99, the Corps levee repair program required 
$20 million to rehabilitate existing flood control works. In 
addition, the Corps inspected its own projects and continues 
to coordinate with state and local governments. 
In April 1995, the Corps responded to the bombing of 
the A.P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City by 
providing 12 Structural Specialists and 6 Technical Search 
Specialists in support of rescue efforts. 
The 1995 hurricane season was the most active in the 
past five decades. Nineteen named storms meant continuous 
vigilance for Corps elements along the Gulf and Atlantic 
coasts. On September 16, 1995, Hurricane Marilyn hit the 
U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico with winds greater than 
100 mph. Additionally, on October 4, 1995 Hurricane 
Opal with winds greater than 100 mph slammed into the 
Florida Panhandle. In response to these disasters, the Corps 
responded under authority of Public Laws 84-99 and 93- 
288. For Hurricane Marilyn, the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency tasked the Corps under the Federal 
Response Plan with more than $100 million in mission 
assignments to provide for: emergency water, temporary 
roofing and housing rehabilitation, temporary power, debris 
removal, technical assistance and logistical support and 
other activities to include storm documentation. Work for 
Hurricane Opal was less, with the State of Florida handling 
most requirements. Execution of work for Marilyn and 
Opal extended into FY 96. 
51-1

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Char cteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage orNo Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acie-Ft) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fee 
ALASKA 
Chena River Lakes 
ARIZONA 
Adobe 
Alanmo 
Cave Buttes 
Dreamy Draw 
New River 
Painted Rock 
Tat Momolikot 
Whitlow Ranch 
ARKANSAS 
Blakely Mountain 
Blue Mountain 
DeeGray 
Duen 
Yukon 
Kuskokwimn 
Gila 
Colorado 
Gila 
Gila 
Gila 
Gila 
Gila 
Gila 
Ouachita Dam 
A asas 
Red 
Red 
Red 
Dierks 
Gillham 
Chena River Fairbanks 
Skunk Creek 
Bill Wms. River 
Cave Creek 
Dreamy Draw 
New River 
Gila River 
Santa Rosa 
Wash 
Queen Qek 
Ouachita 
Petit Jean River 
Caddo 
RollingFork 
River 
Saline River 
Cossatot River 
Phoenix 
Wenden 
Phoenix 
Phoenix 
Phoenix 
GilaBend 
Casa Grde 
Super 
Hot Springs 
Parids 
ADerQkuaedelaa 
Dieriks 
Gillham 
1979 
1982 
1968 
1979 
1973 
1985 
1959 
1974 
960 
1955 
1947 
1971 
1977 
1975 
1975 
2,000 
18,350 
1,045300 
46,600 
320 
43,520 
2,476,340 
198,550 
34,500 
2,768,500 
257,900 
881,900 
136,100 
96,800 
221,800 
NPP 
NPP 
560 
NPP 
NPP 
NPP 
NPP 
NPP 
NPP 
20,900 
2,910 
6,400 
1,680 
1,360 
1370 
FR Earth 
FR 
FRWX 
FRX 
FRX 
F 
FRWX 
GWX 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Eart 
Eat 
Eat 
Eat 
FX Earth 
FP 
FRWX 
FPRSQN 
FSQRW 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
FSRAW Earth & 
Rock 
FSQW Eath & 
50 40,200 
109 
283 
109 
50 
104 
181 
75.5 
2,275 
975 
2,275 
448 
2,320 
4,780 
12,500 
25 978 
235 
115 
243 
160 
1,100 
2,800 
3,400 
2,360 
153 2,500 
160 1,750 
A-1 
t)

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Chamcteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fee 
Rock 
FSW Earth 88 
FP Concrete 175 
FSWX Concrete 97 
Red 
Ouachita 
Arkansas 
Little River Ashdown 
Little Missouri Murfreesboro 
Fourche LaFve Plainview 
River 
1966 
1949 
1942 
1,854,930 
407,900 
336,010 
29,200 
2,500 
3,550 
,th 
t) 
17,554 
941 
1,012 
CALIFORNIA 
Black Butte 
Brea 
Buchanan Dam 
H.V. Eastman Lake 
Carbon Canyon 
Coyote Valley 
Dry Creek 
(Warm Springs) 
Lake and Channel 
Fannington 
Fullerton 
Hansen 
Sacramento 
Santa Ana 
San Joaquin 
Santa Ana 
Russian 
Russian 
Stony Creek 
Brea Creek 
Chowchilla 
River 
Orland 
Fullerton 
Chowchilla 
Carbon Canyon Brea 
River 
East Folk 
Russian River 
Dry Creek 
Ukiah 
HeaIdsbug 
San Joaquin Littlejohn Creek Fannmmington 
Santa Ana East Fullerton Fullerton 
Cik 
Los Angeles Big Tujunga Los Angeles 
Harry L. Englebright Sacramento 
Hidden Dam- Hensley San Joaquin 
Lake 
Isabella 
Lopez 
Wash 
Yuba River 
Fresno River 
Marysville 
Madera 
San Joaquin Kern River Bakersfield 
Los Angeles Pacoima Wash San Femanado 
1963 
1942 
1975 
1961 
1959 
1983 
1952 
1941 
1940 
1941 
1975 
1953 
1954 
160,000 
4,009 
150,000 
6,614 
122,500 
381,000 
52,000 
764 
51,000 
69,000 
90,000 
570,000 
440 
770 
NPP 
470 
NPP 
1,700 
500 
NPP 
NPP 
120 
400 
5,000 
1,850 
NPP 
FIRX Earth 156 
FRX Earth 87 
FIRW Earth & 205.5 
Rock 
FERX Earth 99 
FRX Earh 
FRSW Earth 
F Earth 
FRX Earth 
FRWX Eardh 
2,970 
1,765 
1,800 
2,150 
160 3,500 
319 
60 
46 
3,000 
7,800 
575 
97 10,475 
DR Concrete 280 
FIRW Earth 163 
FIRW Earth 
FX Earth 
185 
50 
1,142 
5,730 
4,952 
1,333 
A-2 
Millwood 
Narrows Dam 
Nimrod

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft) Pool(NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fe 
MartisCreek Sacramento Martis Creek Reno 1971 20,400 71 FSR Earth 113 2,67 
Merced County 
Streamed Group 
Bear 
Bums 
Mariposa 
Owens 
Mojave River 
New Hogan 
San Joaquin Bear Creek Merced 
San Joaquin Bums Creek Merced 
San Joaquin Mariposa Creek Merced 
San Joaquin Owens Creek Merced 
Mojave Mojave River Victorville 
San Joaquin Calaveras River Valley Springs 
North Fork Sacramento American River Aubu 
Pine Flat San Joaquin Kings River Piedra 
Prado Santa Ana Santa Ana River Corona 
Redbank and Fancher San Joaquin FancherCreek Fresno 
Ceeks 
Santa Fe 
Sepulveda 
Success 
Terminus 
Whittier Narrows 
San Antonio Upland 
Qeek 
San Gabriel San Gabriel Duarte 
River 
Los Angeles Los Angeles Van Nuys 
River 
San Joaquin Tule River Portville 
San Joaquin Kaweah River Visalia 
San Gabriel San Gabriel El Monte 
River and Rio 
Hodo 
1954 
1950 
1948 
1949 
1971 
1963 
1939 
1954 
1941 
1993 
1956 
1949 
1941 
1960 
1961 
1957 
7,700 
7,000 
15,000 
3,600 
89,669 
325,000 
14,700 
1,000,000 
196,235 
9,712 
7,703 
32,109 
17,425 
85,000 
150,000 
49,143 
NPP 
NP 
NPP 
NPP 
NPP 
715 
280 
NPP 
NPP 
NPP 
NPP 
NPP 
NPP 
400 
345 
NPP 
F Earth 92 
F Earih 55 
F Earth 88 
F Earth 75 
FRWX Earth 106 
FIRX Earih & 210 
Rock 
DR Concrete 155 
FIRX Concrete 429 
FRX Earth 106 
F Earth 44 
FX Earth 
FRX Earth 
FRX Earth 
FIRX Earth 
FIRX Earth 
FRWX Earth 
t) 
l0 
1,830 
4,075 
1,330 
790 
1,250 
1,960 
620 
1,820 
2,280 
16,135 
160 3,850 
92 23,800 
57 15,444 
142 
250 
56 
3,490 
2,375 
16,960 
A-3 
San Antonio Santa Ana

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fee 
COLORADO 
Bear Creek 
Chatfield 
Chery Creek 
John Martin 
Trinidad 
CONNECTICUT 
Black Rock 
Colebrook River 
Hancock Brook 
Hop Brook 
Mansfield Hollow 
Northfield Brook 
Thomaston 
West Thompson 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Arkansas 
Arkansas 
Bear Creek 
South Platte 
River 
Chenrry Creek 
Arkansas River 
Purgatoire River 
Housatonic Branch Brook 
Connecticut West Branch, 
Famington 
River 
Housatonic Hancock Brook 
Housatonic Hop Brook 
Thames Natchaug River 
Thames Northfield Brook 
Housatonic Naugatuck River 
Thames Quinebeug River 
Denver 
Denver 
Denver 
Lamar 
Trinidad 
1978 
1974 
1950 
1943 
1977 
Thonaston 
Riverton 
Plymouth 
Mddey 
Wllinantic 
Thomaston 
Thomaston 
Thompson 
1970 
1969 
1960 
1968 
1952 
1965 
1960 
1965 
30,810 
231,429 
93,920 
608,250 
123,523 
8,700 
97,700 
4,030 
6,970 
52,000 
2,430 
42,000 
26,800 
109 
1,412 
852 
1,844 
280 
20 
760 
40 
21 
450 
8 
NPP 
200 
FRX Earth 
FRX Earth 
FRX Earth 
HFIR Concrete 
& Earth 
FIRX Earth 
FR Earth 
FRSX Earth 
FRW 
FR 
FRW 
FRW 
F 
FRW 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
FIR Earth 
t) 
180 
148 
141 
106 
200 
154 
223 
57 
97 
68 
118 
142 
70 
IDAHO 
Lucky Peak 
5,300 
12,400 
14,300 
13,962 
6,610 
933 
1,300 
630 
520 
12,420 
810 
2,000 
2,550 
Columbia Boise River Boise 1955 307,000 2,820 340 1,700 
A-4

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft) Pool(NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet
th 
t) 
Kaskaskia River Carlyle 
Farm Creek East Peoria 
Fondulac Creek 
Kaskaskia River 
Big Muddy 
River 
East Peoria 
Sheylle 
Benton 
1967 
1951 
1951 
1970 
1970 
983,000 
15,500 
3,780 
684,000 
294,000 
26,000 
NPP 
NPP 
11,100 
18,900 
FSNRWA Eadh 
F Eath 
F Earth 
FSNRW Earth 
FQRSW Eath 
67 6,570 
80 1,275 
67 1,000 
108 3,000 
54 10,600 
INDIANA 
Brookville 
Cagles Mill 
Cecil M. Harden 
Hutmngton 
Mississinewa 
Monroe 
Patoka 
Salamonie 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
East Fork of 
Whitewater 
River 
Mill Creek 
Raccoon Creek 
Wabash River 
Mississinewa 
Salt Creek 
Patoka River 
Salamonie 
Brookville 
Tere Haute 
Rockville 
Huntington 
Peru 
Harnodsburg 
Ellsworih 
Wabash 
1974 
1952 
1960 
1969 
1967 
1964 
1978 
1966 
359,600 
228,120 
132,800 
153,100 
368,400 
441,000 
301,600 
263,600 
2,250 
1,400 
1,100 
500 
1,100 
3,280 
2,010 
976 
FRSW Earth& 
Rock 
FRX Eath 
FRX Eath 
FRW Eath 
FRW Earth 
FARS Earth 
FRSQW Earth & 
Rock 
FRW Earth 
182 3,000 
150 
117 
91 
137 
93 
84 
950 
1,790 
5,332 
8,100 
1,400 
1,550 
133 6,100 
A-5 
ILLINOIS 
Carlyle 
Farmdale 
Fondulac 
Shelbyville 
Rend Lake 
Upper 
Mississippi 
Upper 
Mississippi 
Upper 
Mississippi 
Upper 
Mississippi 
Upper 
Mississippi

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage orNo Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fee 
th 
t) 
FARW Earth 
FARWQ Earth 
FNRWXQ Earth 
FARWQ Earth 
100 1,400 
110 5,676 
86 
105 
10,600 
6,750 
Wakarusa River 
Grand (Neosho) 
Walnut River 
Elk River 
Fall River 
Big Bull Creek 
Grand (Neosho) 
Smoky Hill 
River 
Cottonwood 
River 
Marais des 
Cygnes 
Republican 
River 
Lawrence 
Council Grove 
El Dorado 
Independence 
Fall River 
Hillsdale 
Burlington 
Marquette 
Marion 
Melvem 
Junction City 
1977 
1964 
1981 
1966 
1949 
1981 
1964 
1948 
1968 
1972 
1965 
397,200 
112,882 
246,825 
287,200 
254,900 
160,000 
623,136 
450,000 
141,802 
363,000 
1,160,000 
7,000 
3,310 
8,400 
4,440 
2,330 
4,580 
9486 
3,815 
6,210 
6,930 
15,600 
FSWXRQ Earth & 
Rock 
FSQR Earth 
FSQR Earth 
FSQWR Earth 
FSXQR Earth 
FSQRWX Farth 
FSQR Earth 
FRWXS Earth 
FRQS Earth 
FRQWXS Earth 
FRSXWN Earth & 
Rock 
114 9,250 
96 
99 
107 
94 
75 
86.5 
131 
7,000 
20,930 
4,840 
6,015 
11,600 
21,300 
15,360 
67 8,495 
98 9.700 
126 6,300 
A-6 
IOWA 
CoralMville 
Red Rock 
RathBun 
Saylorville 
Upper 
Mississippi 
Upper 
Mississippi 
Missouri 
Upper 
Mississippi 
Iowa River 
Des Moines 
River 
Chariton River 
Des Moines 
River 
Iowa City 
Des Moines 
Centerville 
Des Moines 
1958 
1969 
1969 
1975 
475,000 
1,830,000 
552,000 
585,000 
5,430 
19,000 
11,000 
5,950 
KANSAS 
Clinton 
Council Grove 
El Dorado 
Elk City 
Fall River 
Hillsdale 
John Redmond 
Kanopolis 
Marion 
Melvem 
Milford 
Missouri 
Arkansas 
Arkansas 
Arkansas 
Arkansas 
Missouri 
Arkansas 
Missouri 
Arkansas 
Missouri 
Missouri

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fee 
th 
t) 
Pearson Skubitz Big 
Hill 
Perry 
Pomona 
Toronto 
Tuttle Creek 
Wilson 
ArkMansas 
Missouri 
Missouri 
MArkansas 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Big Hill Creek 
Deleware River 
110 Mile Creek 
Verdigris River 
Big Blue River 
Saline River 
Baren River 
Middle Fork of 
Kentucky River 
CarrFoIk 
Licking River 
Johns Creek 
Levisa Folc, Big 
Sandy River 
Little Sandy 
Green River 
Glasgow 
Buckhom 
Hazard 
Farmers 
Paintsville 
Pikeville 
Grayson 
Campbellsville 
Cumberland Martins Fork Harlan 
1964 
1960 
1976 
1974 
1949 
1968 
1967 
1969 
1978 
815,200 
168,000 
47,700 
614,100 
93,000 
164,360 
118,990 
723,200 
21,00 
4,340 
550 
530 
6,790 
1,100 
569 
1,050 
5,070 
578 
FARS 
FQRW 
FQRW 
FQRW 
FARW 
FARW 
FQRW 
FRSQW 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth& 
Rock 
Earth& 
Rock 
Earth 
Rock 
Earth & 
Rock 
Earth & 
146 
162 
130 
148 
118 
195 
120 
142 
Rock 
FQ Concrete 97 
A-7 
Chenyvale 
Peny 
Pomona 
Toronto 
Manhatan 
Wilson 
1981 
1969 
1963 
1960 
1962 
1964 
39,540 
770,000 
230,000 
200,800 
2,346,000 
776,000 
1,190 
12,500 
4,000 
2,660 
15,800 
9,000 
FSRW 
FRSXWN 
FRSWXQ 
FXSQWR 
FRWXONS 
FIRWXN 
Earth 
Earth& 
Rock 
Earth& 
Rock 
Earth 
Earth& 
Rock 
Eath 
83 
96 
85 
90 
157 
160 
3,902 
7,750 
7,750 
4,712 
7,500 
5,600 
KENTUCKY 
Banen River 
Buckhom 
Carr Fork 
Cave Run 
Dewey 
Fishtrap 
Grayson 
Green River 
Martins Fork 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
3,970 
1,020 
720 
2,740 
913 
1,100 
1,460 
2,350 
574

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Damn 
Permanent 
Pool 
(Acreage) 
orNo 
Pool (NPP) 
261 
2,890 
2,180 
1,625 
3,921 
Length 
(Feet) 
1,600 
990 
1,530 
1,280 
760 
70 12,850 
3,700 
30 4,994 
MARYLAND 
Jennings Randolph 
Lake 
MASSACHUSETITS 
Barre Falls 
Potomac North Branch 
Potomac River 
Connecticut Ware River 
Bamum 
Bane 
1981 
1958 
130,900 
24,000 
952 
NPP 
FQRS Earth& 
Rock 
FRW Eaih & 
Rock 
A-8 
Name 
Paintsville 
Nolin 
Rough River 
Taylorsville 
Yatesville 
LOUISIANA 
Bayou Bodcau 
Caddo Lake 
Wallace Lake 
River Basin 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Red 
Red 
Red 
Stream 
Paint Creek 
Nolin River 
Rough River 
Salt River 
Blaine Creek 
Bayou Bodcau 
Cypress Bayou 
Cypress Bayou 
Community 
in Vicinity 
Paintsville 
Kyrock 
Leitchfield 
Taylorsville 
Yatesville 
Shreveport 
Shreveport 
Shreveport 
Cal. Year 
Placed in 
Useful OP 
1983 
1963 
1958 
1983 
1988 
1949 
1971. 
1946 
Total 
Storage 
(Acre-Ft.) 
73,500 
609,400 
334,400 
291,670 
86,951 
357,300 
175,000 
96,100 
Height 
(Feet) 
160 
174 
124 
164 
105 
NPP 
32,700 
2,300 
Project 
Functions 
FQRW 
FAR 
FRX 
FQRW 
FQRW 
FRW 
NFRS 
FQRS 
Type 
Earth& 
Rock 
Earth& 
Rock 
Earth& 
Rock 
Earhh & 
Rock 
Earth & 
Rock 
Earth 
Concrete 
&Earth 
Earth 
296 
62 
2,130 
885
Df Caharateritics 
. . .. ... r...

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Name 
Birch Hill 
Buffumville 
Charles River Natural 
Valley Storage 
Conant Brook 
East Brimfield 
Hodges Village 
Knightville 
Littleville 
Tully 
West Hill 
Westville 
MINNESYFOTA 
Big Stone Lake- 
Whetstone River 
Lac Qui Parle 
Community 
River Basin Stream in Vicinity 
Connecticut Millers River So. Roylaston 
Thames Little River Charlton 
Charles Charles River Millis 
Connecticut Conant Brook Monson 
Connecticut Quinebaug River Fiskdale 
Connecticut French River Oxford 
Connecticut Westfield River Huntington 
Connecticut Middle Branch, Chester 
Westfield River 
Connmecticut Tully River Fyville 
Blackstone West River Ukbridge 
Thames Quinebaug River Sturbridge 
Upper 
Mississippi 
Upper 
Minnesota River Ortonville 
Chippewa River Montevideo 
Cal. Year 
Placed in 
Useful OP 
1941 
1958 
1983 
1966 
1960 
1959 
1941 
1965 
1949 
1960 
1961 
1973 
1950 
Total 
Storage 
(Acre-Ft) 
49,900 
12,700 
35,000 
3,740 
30,000 
12,800 
49,000 
32,400 
22,000 
12,350 
11,100 
45,000 
(2) 
Permanent 
Pool 
(Acreage) 
orNo Project 
Pool (NPP) Functions Type 
NPP FRW Earth & 
Rock 
200 FRW Earth & 
Rock 
NPP F Nonstuc 
tual 
NPP F Earth& 
Rock 
360 FRW Earth & 
Rock 
NPP FRW Earth & 
Rock 
NPP FRW Eaih & 
Rock 
275 FRWS Eaiih & 
Rock 
300 FRW Earth & 
Rock 
NPP FRW Earth & 
Rock 
23 FRW Earth & 
Rock 
12,700 
NPP 
FRW Earth 
FRWX Earth & 
A-9 
Height 
(Feet) 
56 
66 
85 
55 
55 
160 
1,164 
62 
51 
78 
25 
21 
Length 
(Feet) 
1,400 
3,255 
1,050 
520 
2,140 
1,200 
1,360 
1,570 
2,400 
560 
13,700 
17,97 
Doafm Characteristics 
.

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fee 
Chippewa River 
LacQui Parle 
Marsh Lake 
Orwell 
Red Lake 
Mississippi 
Upper 
Mississippi 
Upper 
Mississippi 
Red River 
Red River 
Minnesota River 
Minnesota River 
Otter Tail River 
of the North 
Red Lake River 
of the North 
Montevideo 
Montevideo 
Fergus Falls 
Red River 
1950 
1953 
1953 
1951 
122,800 
14,100 
14,100 
3,270,000 
6,500 
210 
210 
279,000 
Rock 
FRWX Earth & 
Rock 
FARS Earth & 
Rock 
FARS Earth & 
Rock 
FARSX Earth & 
Rock 
21 4,100 
19.5 11,800 
47 1,355 
15.5 36,500 
MISSISSIPPI 
Arkabutla Lake 
Enid Lake 
Grenada Lake 
Okatibbee 
Sardis Lake 
MISSOURI 
Clearwater 
Lower 
Mississippi 
Lower 
Mississippi 
Lower 
Mississippi 
Pascagoula 
Lower 
Mississippi 
White 
Coldwater River 
Yocona River 
Mississippi ' 
Yalobusha River 
Okatibbee Creek 
Little 
Tallahatchie 
Rivere 
Black River 
Arkabutla 
Enid 
Grenada 
Meridian 
Sardis 
Piedmont 
1945 
1952 
1954 
1969 
1940 
1948 
525,300 
660,000 
1,337,400 
142,400 
1,570,000 
413,700 
5,100 
6,100 
9,800 
1,280 
10,700 
1,630 
F Earth & 
Rock 
F Earth& 
Rock 
F Earth& 
Rock 
FQSR Earth 
F Earth& 
Rock 
FRWX Earlh & 
Rock 
81 11,500 
99 8,400 
102 13,900 
67 
117 
6,543 
15,300 
154 4,225 
A-10 
th 
t}

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD.CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage orNo Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fee 
Long Branch Grand Chariton Little Charlton Macon 1980 65,000 2,430 FRSQW Earth 71 3,80 
Little Blue River Lakes 
Blue Springs 
Longview 
Pomme de Terre 
Smithville 
Wappapello 
NEBRASKA 
Harlan County 
Papillion Creek and 
Tnbutaries 
Glenn Cunningham 
(Site 11) 
Standing Bear (Site 16) 
Ed Zorinsky(Site 18) 
Wehrspann (Site 20) 
Salt Creek & Tributaries 
Olive Creek (Site 2) 
Blue Stem (Site 4) 
Wagon Train (Site 8) 
Little Blue River 
Little Blue River 
Pomme de Terre 
River 
Little Platte River 
St. Francis River 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Lower 
Mississippi 
Missouri 
Missouri 
KansasCity 
Kansas City 
Hermnnitage 
Smithville 
Wappapello 
Republican City 
Omaha 
Omaha 
Omaha 
Omaha 
Kramer 
Sprague 
Holland 
1988 
1986 
1961 
1982 
1941 
1952 
1975 
1973 
1991 
1991 
1964 
1963 
1963 
26,600 
46,900 
650,000 
246,500 
613,200 
850,000 
17910 
5,220 
6,910 
1,990 
5,470 
10,260 
9,280 
560 
930 
7,820 
7,190 
4,100 
13,600 
391 
137 
418 
203 
174 
316 
303 
FRW Earth& 
Rock 
FRWQ Earth 
FRWXA Eath & 
Rock 
FSQRW Earth 
FR Earth& 
Rock 
FIRWXA Earth 
FQEX Earth 
FRX Earth 
FR 
FR 
Earth 
Eadh 
FR Earth 
FR Earth 
FR Earth 
2,500 
78 1,900 
120 
155 
95 
109 
107 
67 
thL
t) 
0 
4,630 
4,200 
2,700 
11,827 
1,940 
70 1,460 
64 
59 
11,400 
11,810 
45 3,020 
57 2,760 
52 1,650 
A-11 
Republican Riv 
Knight Creek 
Trib of Big 
Papillion Ceek 
Boxelder Creek 
S. Papillion 
C ek 
S. Trib. Olive Br. 
Creek 
N. Tnb Olive Br. 
Creek 
N. Tnb. 
Hickman Creek 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Missouri

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet 
Stagecoach Site (9) Missouri S. Tnib. Hickman Hickman 1964 6,640 1% FB Earth 48 2,25( 
Yankee Hill (Site 10) 
Conestoga (Site 12) 
Town Lake (Site 13) 
Pawnee (Site 14) 
Holmes Park Lake 
(Site 17) 
Branched Oak (Site 18) 
NEW HAMPSHIRE 
Blackwater 
Edward MacDowell 
Franklin Falls 
Hopkinton-Everett 
Otter Brook 
Sunry Mountain 
NEVADA 
Mathews Canyon 
Pine Canyon 
Creek 
Cardwell Creek 
Holmes Creek 
Middle Creek 
N. Middle Creek 
Antelope Creek 
Oak Creek 
Merimack Blackwater River 
Merrimack Nubanusit Brook 
Merrimack Pemigewasset 
Riv 
Merrimack Contoocook 
River 
Merrimack Piscataquog Riv 
Connecticut Otter Brook 
Connecticut Ashuelot River 
Mathews 
Canyon 
Pine Canyon 
Denton 
Denton 
Pleasantdale 
Emerald 
Lincoln 
Raymond 
Webster 
West 
Peerborough 
Franklin 
West 
Hopkinton 
East Weare 
Keene 
Keene 
Caliente 
Caliente 
1966 
1964 
1966 
1965 
1963 
1968 
1941 
1950 
1943 
1962 
1962 
1958 
1941 
1957 
1957 
7,560 
10,640 
8,080 
29,520 
6,510 
97,560 
46,000 
12,800 
154,000 
71,500 
87,500 
18,300 
32,500 
6,271 
7,747 
208 
230 
255 
728 
100 
1,780 
NPP 
NPP 
NPP 
200 
120 
85 
265 
NPP 
NPP 
FR 
FR 
FR 
FR 
FR 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Eairuh 
FR Earth 
FRW Earth 
FRW Earth 
FRW Earth 
FRW Earth 
FRW 
FRW 
FRW 
Earth 
Eath 
Earth 
FX Earth 
FX Earth 
52 
63 
65 
55 
3,100 
3,000 
5,000 
7,700 
70 5,200 
75 
67 
1,150 
1,030 
140 1,740 
76 
115 
133 
86 
71 
92 
790 
2,000 
1,288 
1,670 
800 
884 
A-12 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Colorado 
Colorado 
ul 
t) 
D

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage orNo Proje Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet (F t) 
NEW MEXICO 
Abiquiu 
Cochit 
Conchas 
Galisteo 
Jemez Canyon 
Santa Rosa Dam & 
Reservoir 
Two Rivers: 
Rio Grande Rio Chaia Abiquio 
Rio Grande Rio Grande PenaBlanca 
ArkanMsas Canadian River Tucumcanri 
Rio G ande Galisteo Creek SantaFe 
Rio Grande Jnmez River Bemailillo 
Pecos Pecos Santa Rosa 
Diamond "A" Dam Rio Grande Rio Hondo 
Rocky Dam Rio Grande Rocky Amnoyoo 
Roswell 
1963 
1975 
1939 
1970 
1953 
1979 
1963 
1,198,500 
589,159 
513,900 
89,468 
100,485 
439,860 
163,775 
NPP 
1,200 
2,694 
NPP 
NPP 
NPP 
NPP 
FXS Earth 325 
FRWX Earth 241 
FI Concrete 200 
&Earth 
FX Earth 156 
FX Earth 146.6 
FIX Earth 212 
FX Earth 998 
118 
Susquehanna CanacadeaC k Homell 
Susquehamna Canisteo Crk Arkport 
Susquehanna OutleoutCrk Franklin 
Genesee Genesee River Mount Morris 
Susquehanna Oselic River WhitneyPoint 
Cape Fear New Hope Durhan 
1949 
1940 
1950 
1952 
1942 
1982 
14,600 
7,900 
33,550 
337,000 
86,440 
753,500 
124 
NPP 
210 
170 
1,200 
14,300 
FRW Earth 90 
"F Earth 113 
FRW Concrte 130 
& 
FR Concrete 210 
FRW Earth 95 
FQRSWX Earth 
1,260 
1,200 
2,010 
1,028 
4,900 
112 1,330 
A-13 
1,540 
28,300 
19,400 
2,820 
780 
1,950 
4,885 
2,940 
NEW YORK 
Almond 
East Sidney 
Mount Moris 
Whitney Point 
NORTH 
CAROLINA 
B. Everet Jordan

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
River Basin 
Neuse 
Yadkin Pee 
Dee 
Stream 
Neuse 
Yadkin 
Community 
in Vicinity 
Raleigh 
Wilkesboro 
Cal. Year 
Placed in 
Useful OP 
1983 
1963 
Total 
Storage 
(Acre-Ft.) 
335,620 
153,000 
Permanent 
Pool 
(Acreage) 
or No 
Pool (NPP) 
11,300 
1,470 
Project 
Functions 
FQRSWX 
FARSX 
Type 
Earth 
Earth 
Height 
(Feet) 
92 
148 
NORTH DAKOTA 
Baldhill 
Bowman-Haley 
Homme 
Pipestem 
OHIO 
Alum Creek 
Berlin 
Caesar Creek 
Clarence J. Brown 
Deer Creek 
Delaware 
Red River of 
the North 
Missouri 
Red River of 
the North 
James River 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio ' 
Sheyenne River 
North Fork, 
Grand River 
South Branch of 
Park River 
Pipestem Creek 
Alum Creek 
Mahoning Creek 
CaesarCreek 
Buck Creek 
Deer Creek 
Olen Tangy 
River 
Name 
Falls 
W. Kerr Scott 
Length 
(Feet) 
1,915 
1,740 
Valley City 
Haley 
Park River 
Jamestown 
Africa 
Deerfield 
Wilmington 
Springfield 
New Holland 
Deleware 
1950 
1967 
1951 
1974 
1975 
1943 
1978 
1974 
1968 
1961 
70,000 
92,980 
3,660 
146,880 
134,800 
91,200 
242,200 
63,700 
102,500 
273,000 
325 
1,750 
51 
885 
348 
240 
13,300 
1,010, 
727 
1,325 
FARS 
FSRWK 
FARS 
FRWX 
FRSW 
FARSWQ 
FRSQW 
FQRW 
FRW 
FRWX 
Earh 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Concrete 
&
Concrete 
&
Earth& 
Rock 
Earth& 
Rock 
Earth 
Earth 
61 
79 
67 
108 
93 
96 
165 
72 
93 
118 
1,650 
5,730 
865 
4,000 
10,000 
5,750 
2,750 
6,620 
3,880 
1,400 
A-14 
Doafm Characteristics 
. .. . .

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage orNo Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fee
th 
t) 
Dillon 
Michael J. Kirwan 
Mosquito Creek 
Muskingun River 
Reservoirs: 
Atwood 
Beach City 
Bolivar 
Charles Mill 
Clendening 
Dover 
Leesville 
Mohawk 
Mohicanville 
Piedmont 
Pleasant Hill 
Senecaville 
Tappan 
Wills Creek 
North Branch, 
Kokosing River Lake 
Paint Creek 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Licking River 
West Branch, 
Mahoning River 
Mosquito Creek 
Indian Fork 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Oho 
Oho 
Ohio Kokosing 
River 
Ohio 
Sugar Creek 
Sandy Creek 
Black Fork 
Brushy Fork 
Tuscarawas 
River 
McGuire Creek 
Walhondoing 
Riv 
Lake Fork 
Stillwater Creek 
Clear Fork 
Seneca Fork 
Little Stillwater 
Ck 
Wills Creek 
North Branch of 
Paint Creek 
Zanesville 
Newton Falls 
Cortland 
New 
Cmanbedand 
Beach City 
Bolivar 
Mifflin 
Tippecanoe 
Dover 
Leesville 
Nellie 
Mohicanville 
Piedmont 
Penville 
Senecaville 
Tappan 
Conesville 
Fredericktown 
New Petersburg 
1961 
1966 
1944 
1937 
1937 
1938 
1936 
1937 
1938 
1937 
1937 
1936 
1937 
1938 
1937 
1936 
1937 
1973 
1972 
273,000 
78,700 
104,100 
49,700 
71,700 
149,600 
88,000 
54,000 
203,000 
37,400 
285,000 
102,000 
65,000 
87,700 
88,500 
61,60-0 
196,000 
14,900 
145,000 
1,325 
580 
FRWX Earth 
FAQRSW Earth 
700 FARSWQ Earth 
1,540 
420 
NPP 
1,350 
1,800 
350 
1,000 
NPP 
NPP 
2,270 
850 
3,550 
2,350 
900 
98 
FRX Earth 
FRX 
FR 
FRX 
FRX 
FRX 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Concrete 
FRX Eath 
FR Earth 
FR 
FRX 
FRX 
FRSX 
FRX 
Eath 
Eath 
Earth 
Eath 
Eath 
FRX Earth 
FRW Earth 
710 FRSQW Earh & 
Rock 
118 
83 
1,400 
9,900 
47 5,650 
65 3,700 
64 
87 
48 
64 
83 
74 
111 
46 
56 
113 
45 
52 
87 
71 
5,600 
6,300 
1,390 
950 
824 
1,694 
2,330 
1,220 
1,750 
775 
2,350 
1,550 
1,950 
1,400 
118 700 
A-15

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dan 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feel 
Tom Jenkins Ohio East Branch, Gloucester 1951 26,900 394 FRSWX Concrete 84 944 
West Fork Mill Creek 
William H. Harsha 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Sunday Creek 
Mill Creek 
Little Miami 
River 
Mt Healthy 
Williamsbui 
1952 
1978 
11,380 
284,500 
200 
18,760 
FRX Earth 
FRSQW Earth 
100 
200 
th 
1,100 
1,450 
Arcadia 
Birch 
Canton 
Copan 
Fort Supply 
Great Salt Plains 
Heybum 
Hugo 
Hulah 
Kaw 
Oologah 
Optima 
Pine Creek 
Sardis 
Arkansas 
Arkansas 
Arkansas 
Arkansas 
Arkansas 
Arkansas 
Red 
Arkansas 
Arkansas 
Arkansas 
AIkansas 
Red 
Red 
Deep Fork River 
Birch Creek 
North Canadian 
Riv 
Little Caney 
River 
Wolf Creek 
Salt Fork ofthe 
Arkansas River 
Polecat Creek 
Kiamichi River 
Caney River 
Arkansas River 
Verdigris River 
North Canadian 
Riv 
Little River 
Jackfork Creek 
Edmond 
Bamsdall 
Canton 
Copan 
Fort Supply 
Cherokee 
Hugo 
Bartlesville 
Ponca City 
Oobgah 
Hdesty 
Wright City 
Clayton 
1986 
1977 
1948 
1983 
1942 
1941 
1950 
1974 
1951 
1976 
1963 
1978 
1969 
1984 
92,010 
59,000 
377,100 
227,700 
100,700 
271,400 
55,395 
955,200 
289,000 
1327,160 
1,559,270 
229,500 
465,780 
396,900 
1,820 
1,145 
7,910 
4,850 
1,820 
8,690 
880 
13,140 
3,570 
16,750 
31,040 
5,340 
3,750 
13,610 
FSR 
FSQRW 
FSI 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
FSQRW Earth 
FSX Earth 
FRWX Earth 
FRWXS Earth 
FSQRW 
FSAX 
FSQRW 
FSNRW 
FSRW 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
FSQWR Earh 
FSRW Earth 
102 
97 
68 
5,250 
3,190 
15,140 
73 7,730 
85 
68 
11,865 
6,010 
89 2,920 
101 
94 
125 
137 
120 
124 
101 
10,200 
5,200 
9,466 
4,000 
15,200 
7,712 
14,138 
A-16 
OKLAHOMA

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Clracteristics ofDam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage orNo Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool(NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fee 
Skiaook 
Warilca 
Wister 
OREGON 
Aansas Hominy Creek 
Beaver Creek 
Poteau River 
Sklatook 
Warika 
Wister 
1984 
1977 
1949 
500,700 
325,680 
427,480 
10,190 
10,100 
5,760 
FSQRW 
FISQWR 
FSAX 
Eart 
Earth 
Eat 
143 
106 
99 
3590 
16,637 
5,700 
Applegate River 
Blue River 
Coast Fork, 
Willamette River 
Row River 
Middle Fork, 
Willamette River 
Long Tom River 
Medfodn 
Blue River 
Cottage Grw 
Cottage Grv 
Eugene 
Eugene 
Willow Creek Heppner 
1981 
1968 
1942 
1949 
1965 
1941 
1983 
82,000 
85,000 
30,060 
70,500 
115,000 
110,000 
13,250 
988 AFIQRSW Gravel 
Embank 
ment 
975 FINR Earth 
1,155 FINR Concrete 
&Earth 
1,885 FINR Concrete 
& Earth 
1,865 FINR Rockfill 
&
Concrete 
10,305 FINR Rockfill 
96 
&
Concrete 
FRN Roller 
Compact 
ed 
Concrete 
242 
319 
114 
1,300 
1,329 
2,110 
145 3,352 
193 5,100 
49 6,624 
160 1,780 
A-17 
)
t) 
Applegate 
Blue River 
Cottage Grove 
Dorena 
Fall Creek 
Fern Ridge 
Willow Creek 
Rogue 
Columbia 
Columbia 
Columbia 
Columbia 
Columbia 
Columbia

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Damrn 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Ace-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fee 
th 
t) 
PENNSYLVANIA 
AMln R. Bush 
Aylesworth Creek 
Beltzville 
Blue Marsh 
Conemaugh 
Cowanesque * 
Crooked Creek 
Curwensville 
Susquehanna 
Susquehanna 
Delaware 
Delaware 
Ohio 
Susquehanna 
Ohio 
Susquehanna 
East Branch, Clarion Ohio 
River 
Foster Joseph Sayers Susquehanna 
Francis E. Walter (Bear Delaware 
Creek) 
Gen. Edgar Jadwin Delaware 
Hammond Lakes Susquehanna 
Indian Rock Susquehanna 
Kettle Creek 
Aylesworth 
Creek 
Pohopco Creek 
Tulephoken 
Creek 
Conemaugh 
River 
Cowanesque 
River 
Crooked Creek 
West Branch, 
Susquehanna 
River 
East Branch, 
Clarion River 
Bald Eagle 
Creek 
Lehigh River 
Dybeny Creek 
Crooked Creek 
Codonus Creek 
Renovo 
Archbald 
Lehighton 
Reading 
Saltsburg 
Lawrenceville 
Ford City 
Curwensville 
Wilcox 
Blanchard 
White Haven 
Honesdale 
Tioga 
York 
1962 
1970 
1971 
1978 
1952 
1980* 
1940 
1965 
1952 
1969 
1961 
1960 
1978 
1942 
75,000 
1,700 
68,250 
50,010 
262,700 
89,000 
93,900 
124,200 
84,300 
99,000 
109,610 
24,500 
63,000 
28,000 
160 
64 
947 
960 
800 
1085 
350 
790 
90 
1,730 
80 
NPP 
680 
NPP 
FRW Earth& 
Rock 
F Earth& 
Rock 
FQRSWA Earth & 
Rock 
FAQRSW Earth& 
Rock 
FW Concrete 
& Eaiih 
FRS Earth& 
Rock 
FRW Earth 
FR Earth 
FARQW Earth 
FRW Earth 
FRW Earth& 
Rock 
F Earth 
FR Earth& 
Rock 
FRW Earth 
A-18 
165 
90 
170 
98 
137 
151 
143 
131 
184 
100 
234 
109 
122 
83 
1,350 
1,270 
4,560 
1,775 
1,265 
3,100 
1,480 
2,850 
1,725 
6,835 
3,000 
1,255 
6,450 
1,000

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage orNo Project Height Lengt 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (AcIe-Ft) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet 
Kinzua Ohio Allegheny River Warren 1965 1,180,000 1,900 PFAQRW Concrete 77 1,87 
Loyathanna 
Mahoning Creek 
Prompton 
Raystown 
Shenango 
Stillwater 
Loyalhanna 
Creek 
Saltsburg 
Mahoning Crk New 
Bethlehem 
Lackawaxen Honesdale 
River 
Susquehanna Raystown 
Branch, Juniata 
River 
Huntingdon 
Ohio Shenango River Sharpsville 
Susquehanna Lackawanna Uniondale 
River 
Tioga-Hammond Lakes Susquehanna Tioga River 
Tionesta Ohio 
Union City Ohio 
Woodcock Creek Ohio 
Youghiogheny River Ohio 
Tioga 
Tionesta Creek Tionesta 
French Creek Union City 
French Creek Meadville 
Youghiogheny Confluence 
Riv 
1942 
1941 
1960 
1973 
1966 
1960 
1978 
1940 
1970 
1973 
1943 
95,300 
74,200 
52,000 
762,000 
191,400 
12,000 
62,000 
133,400 
47,640 
20,000 
254,000 
210 
170 
290 
8,300 
1,910 
85 
470 
480 
NPP 
118 
450 
FRW Concrete 114 
&Earth 
FRW Concrete 162 
FRW Earth 
h
t) 
7 
960 
926 
140 1,200 
FRW Earth & 225 
Rock 
FAQRW Concrete 68 
FS Earth 77 
1,700 
720 
1,700 
FR Earth& 140 2,710 
Rock 
FRW Earth 
F Earth 
FQRA Earth 
FARWQ Earih 
154 
88 
90 
184 
1,050 
1,420 
4,650 
1,610 
SOUTH DAKOTA 
Cold Brook Missouri 
Cottonwood Springs Missouri 
Lake Traverse: 
Cold Brook 
Cottonwood 
Springs Creek 
Hot Springs 
Hot Springs 
1953 
1970 
7,200 
8,385 
36 
41 
FRWX Earth 
FRWX Earth 
A-19 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Delaware 
127 
123 
925 
1,190

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage orNo Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-FtL) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fee 
Reservation Control Red River of Bois de Sioux Wheaton 1941 164,500 10,925 FRX Earth 14 9, 
Dam 
White Rock 
the North 
Red River of 
the North 
Riv 
Bois de Sioux 
Riv 
Wheaton 1941 85,500 6,500 FRX Earth 16 14,400 
TEXAS 
Addicks 
Aquilla 
Barker 
Belton 
Benbrook 
Canyon 
Cooper Lake and 
Channel 
Fenells Bridge Dam- 
Lake ( the Plains 
Granger Dam and Lake 
Grapevine 
Hords Creek 
Joe Pool 
Lake Kemp 
Lavon 
San Jacinto South Mayde 
Crk 
Brazos Aquilla Creek 
San Jacinto Buffalo Bayou 
Brazos Leon River 
Trinity Clear Fork, 
Trinity River 
Guadalupe Guadallupe 
River 
Red Sulphur River 
Red 
Brazos 
Trinity 
Colorado 
Tmnity 
Red 
Trinity 
Cypress Creek 
San Gabriel 
River 
Denton Creek 
Hods Creek 
Mountain Creek 
Wichita River 
East Fork, 
Addicks 
Hillsboro 
Barker 
Belton 
Fort Worth 
New Braunfels 
Cooper 
Jefferson 
Granger 
Grapevine 
Coleman 
Grand Prairie 
Wichita Falls 
Fort Worth 
Trinity River 
1948 
1983 
1945 
1954 
1952 
1964 
1991 
1959 
1980 
1952 
1948 
1986 
1972 
1953 
204,500 
146,000 
207,000 
1,097,600 
258,600 
366,400 
441,200 
842,100 
244,200 
425,500 
25,310 
304,000 
503,019 
748,200 
NPP 
3,280 
NPP 
12,300 
3,770 
346,400 
19,305 
18,700 
4,400 
7,280 
510 
7,470 
15,590 
21,400 
FX Earth 
FSX 
FX 
FIRSX 
FNRXA 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
FRSX Earth 
FRSWX Earth 
FRS Earth 
FRSWX Earth 
FNRSXA 
FARSX 
FRSX 
FIS 
FRSW 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
49 61,166 
104.5 
27 
192 
130 
11,890 
72,844 
5,524 
9,130 
224 4,410 
79 28,070 
97 10,600 
115 16,320 
137 
91 
109 
93 
81 
12,850 
6,800 
22,360 
8,890 
19,483 
A-20 
,UI 
l) 
0

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fee 
Lewisville Trinity Elm Fcrx Lewisville 1954 989,700 23,280 FRSX Ear 125 32,8 
Navarn Mills 
North San Gabriel 
Dam, Lake Georgetown 
O.C. Fisher 
Pat Mayse 
Proctor 
Ray Roberts 
Somerville 
Stillhouse Hollow 
Waco 
Wright Palman 
Trinity River 
Trinity Richland Creek Corsicana 
Baazos North Fork, San Geogetown 
Gabriel River 
Colorado Norxih Concho San Angelo 
Riv 
Red Sanders Qrek Paris 
Brazos Leon River Comanche 
Trinity Elm Fork Denton 
Brazos Yegua Creek Somerville 
Bazos Lampesas River Belton 
Brazos Bosque River Waco 
Red Sulphur River Texarkana 
1962 
1980 
1952 
1967 
1963 
1987 
1967 
1968 
1965 
1957 
212,200 
130,800 
396,400 
182,940 
374,200 
1,064,600 
507,500 
630,400 
726,400 
2,654,300 
5,070 
1,310 
5,440 
5,940 
4,610 
29,350 
11,460 
6,430 
7,270 
20,300 
FRSX Eat 
FRSWX Rock 
FRSX Earth 
82 
164 
th 
t) 
88 
6,700 
6,700 
128 40,885 
FRSW Earth 96 
FRSX Earth 86 
FRSX Earth 109 
FRSX Earth 80 
FRSX Earth 200 
FRSX Concrete 140 
&Earth 
FRSX Eat 
7,080 
13,460 
14,965 
26,175 
15,624 
24,618 
100 18,500 
UTAH 
Little Dell Lake 
VERMONT 
Ball Mountain 
North Haitland 
North Springfield 
Jordan River Dell Crek 
Connecticut WestRiver 
Salt Lake City 
Jamaica 
Connecticut Ottauguechee NouthHartland 
River 
Connecticut Black River Springfield 
1993 
1961 
1960 
1960 
20,500 
54,600 
71,420 
51,067 
1,000 
75 
220 
290 
FS Earth 224 
FRW Concrete 265 
&Earth 
FRW Concrete 185 
& Earth 
FRW Concrete 120 
&Earth 
A-21 
1,700 
915 
1,520 
2,940

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage orNo Project Height Len 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fee 
Townshend Connecticut West River Townshend 1961 33,700 100 FRW Concrete 133 1,70 
Connecticut Ompompanoosu 
c River 
Union Village 1950 38,000 NPP 
& Earth 
FRW Concrete 
& Earth 
170 
th 
t) 
0 
1,100 
VIRGINIA 
John W. Flannagan 
Gathright Dam & Lake 
Moomaw 
North Fork of Pound 
River 
WASHINGTON 
Howard A. Hanson 
Mill Creek 
Mud Mountain 
WEST VIRGINIA 
Beech Fork 
Bluestone 
Bumsville 
East Lynn 
Ohio 
James 
Ohio 
Pound River Haysi 
Jackson 
North Fork of 
Pound 
Green 
Columbia 
Puyallup 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Ohio 
Green River 
Mill Creek 
White River 
Beech Fork 
New River 
Little Kanawha 
Twelve Pole 
Creek 
Alleghany 
Pound 
Kanaskat 
Walla Walla 
Enumclaw 
Lavalette 
Hinton 
Bumsville 
East Lynn 
1963 
1979 
1968 
1961 
1942 
1953 
1977 
1952 
1977 
1970 
145,700 
123,739 
11,300 
106,000 
8,300 
106,000 
37,540 
631,000 
65,400 
82,500 
310 
2,532 
349 
1,600 
225 
NPP 
450 
1,800 
550 
823 
FAWR Concrete 
& Earth 
FQR Earth& 
Rock 
FRSW Earth& 
Rock 
FAS Rock 
FR Earth 
FR Rock 
FRW Earth 
FRWX Concrete 
FQRW Earth & 
Rock 
FQRW Earth & 
Rock 
250 960 
257 1,172 
122 600 
235 
125 
427 
500 
3,200 
810 
86 
180 
89 
1,080 
2,048 
1,400 
122 650 
A-22 
Union Village

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Characteristics of Dam 
Permanent 
Pool 
Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 
Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Leng 
Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft) Pool (NPP) Functions Type Feet) (Fee 
R D. Bailey Ohio Guyandotte Justice 1979 203,700 440 FQRW Earth & 310 139 
Stonewall Jackson Lake 
Summersville Lake 
Sutton 
Tygart River 
Ohio 
River 
West Fork 
Gauley River 
Elk River 
Tygart River 
Weston 
Summersville 
Sutton 
Grafton 
1988 
1965 
1960 
1938 
74,650 
413,800 
265,300 
287,700 
360 
407 
270 
620 
FAQAS 
FANR 
FNAR 
FNAR. 
Rock 
Concrete 
Rock 
Concrete 
Concrete 
95 
390 
220 
230 
t) 
620 
2,280 
1,921 
1,921 
WIScONISIN 
Eau Galle Chippewa Eau Galle Spring Valley 1969 43,600 150 FR Earth 122 1,800 
* Project became operable for water supply FY 1990 
A-23

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO 
BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS 
SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
River Basin Stream 
Cal. Year 
Community Placed in 
in Vicinity Useful Op 
Total 
Storage 
(Acre-Ft.) 
Permanent 
Pool 
(Acreage) 
or No 
Pool (NPP) 
Characteristics of Dam 
Project 
Functions Type 
Height Length 
(Feet) (Feet) 
CALIFORNIA 
Big Dry Creek 
Camanche2 
Cherry Valley 3 
Del Valle 
Eaton Wash 
New Bullards Bar2 
New Don Pedro3 
New Exchequer 2 
Oroville 2 
Tahchevah Creek 
COLORADO 
Pinon Canyon 
CONNECTICUT 
East Branch 
Hall Meadow Brook 
San Joaquin 
San Joaquin 
Tuolumne 
Alameda 
Rio Hondo 
Sacramento 
San Joaquin 
San Joaquin 
Sacramento 
Whitewater 
Big Dry Creek 
Mokelumne River 
Cherry Creek 
Arroyo Del Valle 
Eaton Wash 
Yuba River 
Tuolumne River 
Merced River 
Feather River 
Tahchevah Creek 
Colorado Pinon Canyon 
Arroyo 
Housatonic East Branch, 
Housatonic Hall Meadow Brook 
Fresno 
Clements 
Sonora 
Livermore 
Pasadena 
Marysville 
Modesto 
Merced 
Oroville 
Palm Springs 
Trinidad 
1948 
1963 
1956 
1968 
1937 
1968 
1970 
1966 
1964 
1965 
1954 
Torrington 1964 
Naugatuck River 
Torrington 1962 
16,250 
431,500 
268,000 
77,000 
960 
960,000 
2,030,000 
1,026,000 
3,539,000 
960 
NPP 
NPP 
475 
200 
NPP 
1,910 
3,520 
1,900 
5,838 
NPP 
4,350 NPP 
4,350 NPP 
8,620 NPP 
F
FRS 
FS 
FRS 
F
FIRPW 
FISP 
FIR 
FIRSW 
F
FW 
FR 
Earth 
Earth & Rcck 
Earth & Rock 
Earth 
Earth 
Concrete 
Earth & Rock 
Rock 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
40 
171 
315 
223 
82 
645 
565 
480 
770 
42 
20,038 
2,450 
2,500 
880 
1,795 
2,323 
1,920 
1,200 
6,850 
3,610 
92 
Earth 
700 
92 
Earth & Rock 
100 
73 1,200 
A-24 
Name 
_.. 
-------- ----

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO 
BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS 
SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Permanent 
Pool Characteristics of Dam 
Cal. Year Total 
Community Placed in Storage 
Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) 
(Acreage) 
or No 
Pool (NPP) 
Project 
Functions 
Height 
Type (Feet) 
Mad River 
Sucker Brook 
Kaneohe-Kailua 
AREA 
Connecticut Mad River 
Connecticut Sucker Brook 
Kaneohe Kaneohe Stream 
Winchester 1963 9,700 
Winchester 1970 1,480 
Kaneohe 1981 
Ririe Upper Snake 
MARYLAND 
Savage River 
MISSOURI 
Willow Creek 
Potomac Savage 
Idaho Falls 1975 
Western Port 1952 
100,500 364 
20,000 360 
FIR 
FRS 
Earth 
Earth & Rock 
Bear Creek Upper 
Mississippi 
Bear Creek Hannibal 1962 8,700 NPP F Earth 65 1,450 
NEW YORK 
Onondaga Creek Syracuse 1949 18,200 NPP 
A-25 
Name River Basin 
CONNECTICUT (continueed) 
HAWAII 
Length 
(Feet) 
IDAHO 
10 
NPP 
FR 
F 
------------ - - --------------- ----- -- - 
Earth 
Earth 
3,800 Earth 
178 
68 
26 FR 
940 
1,160 
92 100 
Onandaga Oswego 
253 
184 
1,070 
1,050 
F Earth 67 1,782
'-~

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO 
BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS 
SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Permanent 
Pool Characteristics of Dam 
River Basin Stream 
Cal. Year Total 
Community Placed in Storage 
in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) 
(Acreage) 
or No 
Pool (NPP) 
Project 
Functions Type 
OKLAHOMA 
Altus4 Red 
Grand Lake O' 
the Cherokees 
Lake Hudson 5 
Arkansas 
River 
Arkansas 
North Fork, 
of the Red Riv. 
Grand (Neosho) 
Grand (Neosho) 
River 
Altus 1948 152,429 6,260 
Disney 1941 2,197,000 46,5006 
Locust Grove 1964 444,500 10,9006 
FIS 
FRP 
FRP 
Concrete 
Concrete 
Concrete 
& Earth 
90 1,104 
147 6,565 
90 4,494 
UTAH 
Big Wash 
VERMONT 
East Barre 
Waterbury 
Wrightsville 
Beaver 
Winooski 
Winooski 
Winooski 
Big Wash 
Jail Branch 
Waterbury 
North Branch, 
WASHINGTON 
Wynoochee Chehalis Wynoochee River 
Milford 
East Barre 
Waterbury 
Wrightsville 
Montesano 
1961 
1938 
1938 
1938 
1,200 NPP 
12,050 
64,700 
20,300 
NPP 
890 
570 
1972 70,000 1,150 
F
FRP 
FR 
FSARI 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Earth 
Concrete 
& Earth 
34 2,814 
65 
158 
115 
177 
1,460 
1,800 
1,525 
1,700 
A-26 
Name 
Height Length 
(Feet) (Feet) 
--------- ~-~~ ~----------I -~--- ------- -

APPENDIX A 
FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS 
A - Low Flow Augmentation 
D - Debris Control 
F - Flood Control 
I - Irrigation 
N - Navigation 
P - Power 
Q - Water Quality Control 
R - Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) 
S - Water Supply 
W - Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) 
X - Water Conservation and Sedimentation 
I Acres of water surface at top of permanent pool 
2 Federal Government contributed for flood storage 
3 Cherry Valley Reservoir: Planned and constructed by local interests as initial phase; provided flood control on interim basis. Second and final phase, New Don 
Pedro Reservoir: Federal Government contributed for flood protection. Construction and operation by City and County of San Francisco and Turlock and 
Modesto Irrigation Districts. 
4 Construction by Bureau of Reclamation. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 
5 Construction by Grand River Dam Authority. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 
6 Top of power pool. 
A-27

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Fiscal Year 
Fiscal Placed in Completed or 
Year Useful Scheduled for 
Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project 
Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, HI 
Alton to Gale Levee System, Mississippi River, IL 
and MO 
Arcadia Lake, OK 
Ascalmore-Tippo Items, MS 
Ashland Road Bridge, Four Mile Creek, NE 
(See 14) 
Atchafalaya Basin, LA 
B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC 
Badger Creek near Browning, Glacier County, MT 
(Sec 14) 
Baraga County, MI (See 14) 
Bartlett Road Bridge, Harrington Crk, TN 
Batesville Sewage Lagoon 
Bassett Creek, MN 
Battrey Pringle, SC (Sec 14, then converted to Sec 
103) 
Bayou Des Glaises, LA 
Beals Creek, Big Spring, TX 
Bent's Old Fort, CO (Sec 14) 
Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK 
Big Fork River, MN 
Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO (Sec 14) 
1995 
1983 
1980 
1984 
1996 
1928 
1967 
1993 
1991 
1995 
1990 
1987 
1995 
1938 
1993 
1995 
1992 
1995 
1985 
1986 
(2) 
1982 
1994 
1991 
1990 
1993 
1939 
1995 
1985 
1997 
Indefinite 
Indefinite 3 
1987 
1996 
2010 
1997 
1994 
1991 
1996 
1990 
1995 
1995 
1939 
1997 
1995 
1997 
1996 
1986 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Reservoir 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Floodway and Levees 
Reservoir 
Streambank Protection 
Shoreline Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Interior Drainage 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Emergency Bank Stabilization 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
B-1

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Fiscal Year 
Fiscal Placed in Completed or 
Year Useful Scheduled for 
Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project 
Black River, Hwy HH, Wayne Co., MO 
Blackberry Creek, Henry County, VA (Sec 205) 
Blue River, Gregory Boulevard., Kansas City, MO 
(Sec 14) 
Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO 
Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL 
Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO. 
Brush Creek, Ternette, PA (Sec 14) 
Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX 
Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point Village, TX 
Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA 
Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO 
Carolina Beach and Vicinity, NC 
Central and Southern, FL 
Chadakoin River, Jamestown, NY (Sec 14) 
Charlevouix, East Jordan, MI (Sec 14) 
Chaska, MN 
Chauvin Bayou, LA (Sec 205) 
Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, 
WA 
Chena River Lakes, AK 
Choctawhatchee/Pea Rivers, Elba and Geneva, AL 
Chub Runn, Franklin, PA (Sec 14) 
Clear Creek, TX 
1989 
1994 
1996 
2006 
1993 
1996 
1995 
Indefinite 
1995 
1995 
1999 
1994 
1999 
1995 
1990 
1997 
1994 
1997 
1989 
1996 
1996 
2004 
1988 
1994 
1995 
1984 
1990 
1991 
1994 
1956 
1994 
1990 
1992 
1994 
1950 
1991 
1987 
1994 
1991 
1994 
1973 
1995 
1995 
1988 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
1989 
1994 
1991 
1995 
1994 
1995 
1990 
1993 
1979 
B-2 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Periodic Beach Replenishment 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Reservoirs and Levee 
Flood Warninf 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Fiscal Placed in 
Year Useful 
Started Operation 
1994 
1994 
1958 1991 
1966 
1994 1995 
1987 1990 
1992 
1994 
1994 1994 
1975 
1994 1994 
Project 
Clifton, AZ 
Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO (Sec 205) 
Cooper Lake and Channels, TX 
Corte Madera Creek, CA 
County Road 62, Santa Fe, NM (Sec 14) 
Cowanesque Lake, PA 
Cox Run, Wellsburg, WV (Sec 14) 
Coyote and Berressa Creeks, CA 
Crooked Creek, Harrison, AR 
Dade County, FL 
Dearborn River near Wolf Creek Lewis & Clark 
County, MT (Sec 14) 
Delaware River vicinity of Port Jervis, NY 
Demonstration Erosion Control, MS 
Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA 
Domonaskas Library, Sheffield, OH (Sec 14) 
Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel 
Dunbar (Sewage Facilities), WV (Sec 14) 
East Nishnabotna River, Page County Bridge, IA (Sec 
14) 
East St. Louis and Vicnity, IL - Rehabilitation 
El Paso, TX 
Elk Creek Lake, OR 
Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL(Sec 205) 
1995 
1983 
1987 
1993 
1973 
1995 
Fiscal Year 
Completed or 
Scheduled for 
Completion 
1997 
Indefinite 
1996 
Indefinite 
1995 
1990 
1994 
1997 
1995 
2038 
1994 
1996 
Indefinite 
Indefinite 
1995 
1996 
1987 
1994 
1997 
Indefinite 
Indefinite 
1995 
B-3 
.. 
Nature of Project 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Reservoir, channel improvement 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Water Supply Modification 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection, channel improvement 
Shore Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection (Ice Diversion) 
Local Protection 
Recreation 
Streambank Protection 
Reservoir 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Reservoir 
Local Protection 
1995 
1985 
1989 
1995 
1967 
1986 
1992 
1988 
1971 
1971 
1988

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Placed in 
Useful 
Project Operation 
Evansville, IN 
Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA 
Falls Lake, NC 
Fair Haven, MI (Sec 14) 
Farmington River, Simsbury, CT 
Fisher Ferry Road, MS (Sec 14) 
Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT (Sec 205) 
Fletcher Creek, Memphis, TN (Sec 14) 
Four Rivers Basin, FL 
Fourche Bayou, Vicinity of Little Rock, AR 
Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort Section) 
Gadsden-Water Treatment Plant, Gadsden, AL 
Gallatin River, (1-90), Gallatin County, MT 
Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN (Sec 205) 
Great Bend,KS 
Greenwood Bendway, Site 3, MS 
Greenwood Bendway, Site 4, MS 
Greenwood Bendway, Site 5, MS 
Guadalupe River, CA 
Guntersville Lake, Guntersville, AL 
Halstead,KS 
Hancock County Seawall, Hancock County, MS 
Highway 75, Embudo Creek, Dixon, NM (Sec 14) 
Fiscal 
Year 
Started 
1939 
1985 
1973 
1987 
1994 
1987 
1994 
1991 
1966 
1987 
1991 
1994 
1991 
1994 
1988 
1986 
1987 
1987 
1992 
1988 
1991 
1995 
1995 
B-4 
Fiscal Year 
Completed or 
Scheduled for 
Completion 
1996 
1993 
1996 
1994 
1995 
1990 
1995 
1991 
1996 
1993 
1996 
1995 
1992 
1996 
1994 
1988 
1988 
1988 
Being 
Determined 
1989 
1995 
1995 
1995 
1993 
1983 
1994 
1991 
1986 
1991 
1992 
1995 
Nature of Project 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Reservoir 
Shorline Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Flood Warning System 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Riverbank Protection 
Riverbank Protection 
Riverbank Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Shorline Protection 
Streambank Protection

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Fiscal Year 
Fiscal Placed in Completed or 
Year Useful Scheduled for 
Started Operation Completion Nature of Project 
1994 
1995 
1994 
1989 
1995 
1993 
1993 
1994 
Project 
Highway 119, Derry, LA (Sec 14) 
Highway 218, Grand Chenier, LA (Sec 14) 
Highway 495, Natchitoches,Parish, LA (Sec 14) 
Hills Point Road, MD (Sec 14) 
Holbrook, AZ 
Hoopersville Road, MD (Sec 14) 
Horn Lake Creek, MS 
Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA\ (Dam Safety 
Assurance) 
Humboldt, TN (Sec 205) 
Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City,MD (Sec 14) 
James R. Olin Flood Control Project, VA 
Joe Pool Lake, TX 
Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, HI (Sec 205) 
Kahoma Stream, Maui, HI 
Kawainui Marsh, Ohu, HI (Sec 205) 
Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Leeve Dist., IL 
Keuka Lake Outlet Mod, NY (Sec 205) 
Kirbyville, TX (Sec 205) 
LaConner, WA 
Lake Chicot Pumping Plant, AR 
Lake Elsinore, CA (See 205) 
Lake Erie, Fredonia, NY (Sec 14) 
Lake Pontchartrain, LA 
1996 
1989 
1994 
1988 
1990 
1986 
1990 
1990 
1995 
1993 
1992 
1986 
1989 
1994 
1975 
1989 
1986 
2995 
1980 
1991 
1989 
1994 
1981 
1993 
1992 
1967 
1994 
1996 
1994 
1989 
1995 
1994 
1995 
Being 
Determined 
1988 
1991 
1997 
1996 
1990 
1990 
1997 
1986 
1995 
1993 
1996 
1992 
1995 
1992 
2013 
B-5 
Streambank Protection 
Bank Stabilization 
Streambank Protection 
Shoreline Protection 
Local Protection 
Shoreline Protection 
Local Protection 
Seismic Protection 
Local Protection 
Shoreline Protection 
Local Protection 
Reservoir 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Bank Stabilization 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Shoreline Protection 
Local Protection

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Project 
Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX 
Larose to Golden Meadow, LA 
Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River & 
Cumberland River, KY, WV & VA 
Little Calumet River, IN 
Little Dell Lake, UT 
Little Kanawha River, Glenville, WV (Sec 14) 
Little Red River, Clinton, AR (See 205) 
Lock Haven, PA 
Long Branch Lake, MO 
Los Angeles County Drainage Area 
Loves Park, IL 
Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA 
Lower San Joaquin River, CA (Snagging and 
Clearing) 
Lummi Shore Road, Whatcom County, WA (Sec 14) 
Madrid Fire Station, Madrid, MN (Sec 14) 
Mahoning River, Warren, OH (Sec 14) 
Maple Creek E. Fork, Howells, NE (Sec 205) 
Masefau Bay, Tutuila Island, American Samoa (Sec 
14) 
Mauvaise Terre, IL 
Mayfield Creek, KY (SEC 205) 
McCreadys Point Road, MD (Sec 14) 
Fiscal 
Year 
Started 
1987 
1972 
1981 
1990 
1985 
1986 
1985 
1991 
1973 
1991 
1961 
1985 
1995 
1995 
1995 
1994 
1989 
1985 
1992 
1993 
Placed in 
Useful 
Operation 
1993 
1987 
1986 
1994 
1980 
1992 
1993 
1994 
Fiscal Year 
Completed or 
Scheduled for 
Completion 
1995 
2002 
Indefinite 
2002 
1996 
1987 
1987 
1994 
Indefinite 
1999 
Indefinite 
Indefinite 
1995 
1996 
1996 
1996 
1992 
1987 
1995 
1994 
Nature of Project 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Reservoirs 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Reservoir 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Snagging and Clearing 
Shoreline Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Shoreline Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Shoreline Protection 
B-6

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Project 
McKinley Park, Milwaukee, WI (Sec 14) 
Merced County Streams, CA 
Middle Hooper Island, MD (Sec 14) 
Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR 
Millington, TN (Sec 205) 
Mill Run, Sinclairville, NY (Sec 14) 
Miller Run, Cecil Twp, PA (Sec 14) 
Mingo Creek, OK 
Minnesota River at Belgrade, MN (Sec 14) 
Mississippi River Channel Improvements 
(IA, IL, KY, LA, MI, MO & TN) 
Mississippi River Levees 
Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO 
Mound State Park, Moundville, AL 
Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA 
Muddy Creek Cascade, Vaughn, MT (Sec 14) 
Mudline to Pineville, MS 
Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Dam Safety Assurance) 
Murder Creek, Brewton, AL (Sec 205) 
Muscatine Island, IA 
Muskegon (Duck Lake), MI (Sec 14) 
Muskegon, Memorial Drive, MI (Sec 14) 
Muskingham River Lakes, OH 
Fiscal 
Year 
Started 
1986 
1985 
1993 
1990 
1990 
1992 
1995 
1988 
1992 
1928 
1928 
1948 
1991 
1986 
1992 
1984 
1986 
1986 
1995 
1990 
1986 
1976 
Placed in 
Useful 
Operation 
1993 
1994 
1994 
1992 
1991 
1995 
1994 
1993 
1990 
1985 
1995 
1991 
1994 
B-7 
.. 
Fiscal Year 
Completed or 
Scheduled for 
Completion 
1993 
Indefinite 
1994 
1994 
1995 
1995 
1995 
1998 
1995 
2010 
2021 
2005 
Being 
Determined 
1996 
1994 
1985 
1996 
1994 
1999 
1992 
1994 
1988 
Nature of Project 
Shoreline Protection 
Reservoirs 
Shoreline Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Channel Improvements 
Main Line Levees 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Modernization of Dam 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Shoreline Protection 
Shoreline Protection 
Major Rehabilitation

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Project 
Muskingum River Lakes, OH (Dam Safety 
Assurance) 
Nelson Run, Ross Twp., PA (Sec 14) 
New Orleans to Venice, LA 
Newark, OH 
NonconnanhCreek, TN & MS 
North Branch Chicago River 
North Ellenville, NY 
North Nashua River, Leominster, MA 
North Nashua River, Leominster, MA (Sewer Line) 
Oates Creek, GA 
Oconto River, WI 
Oelwin, Fayette County, IA (Sec 205) 
O'Hare Reservoir, IL 
Ohio River, Chester, WV (Sec 14) 
Otter Creek, Shannon Hills, AR (Sec 205) 
Paintsville Lake, KY 
Pajaro River, CA 
Panola-Quitman Item C, MS 
Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lake, NE 
Pataha Creek near Pomeroy, WA (Sec 14) 
Paw Paw Lake, MI (Sec 205) 
Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE (Sec 205) 
Pelucia Creek, Item 1, MS 
Fiscal 
Year 
Started 
1982 
1993 
1969 
1976 
1990 
1970 
1995 
1994 
1995 
1990 
1993 
1993 
1990 
1994 
1984 
1973 
1987 
1984 
1972 
1993 
1976 
1993 
1985 
Placed in 
Useful 
Operation 
1994 
1995 
1993 
1995 
1984 
1983 
1989 
1974 
1987 
1994 
1986 
Fiscal Year 
Completed or 
Scheduled for 
Completion 
Indefinite 
1995 
2010 
1992 
1997 
Indefinite 
1997 
1995 
1996 
1992 
1996 
1995 
1997 
1995 
1986 
1991 
1989 
1993 
1995 
1993 
1987 
1995 
1987 
Nature of Project 
Modernization of Dams 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Snagging and Clearing 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Reservoir 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Reservoir 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Reservoirs 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
B-8 
.r.

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR1995 
Fiscal Year 
Fiscal 
Year 
Started 
1987 
1990 
1990 
1993 
1987 
1977 
1991 
1995 
1993 
1966 
1982 
1975 
1985 
I 1967 
1965 
1975 
1987 
1995 
Placed in 
Useful 
Operation 
1987 
1993 
1993 
1993 
1989 
1985 
1991 
1995 
1995 
1984 
1986 
1980 
1987 
1993 
1995 
Project 
Pelucia Creek, Item lA, MS 
Pelucia Creek, Item 2, MS 
Pelucia Creek, Item 3, MS 
Pelucia Creek, Item 4, MS 
Perkins Street Bridge, TN (Sec 14) 
Perry County L & D Nos. 1, 2, 3, MO 
Petit Jean River, Hwy 309, AR 
Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity 
Pinopolis Dam, SC (Sec 14) 
Plum Creek, Oakmont, PA (Sec 14) 
Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX 
Porter Bayou, MS (Sec 205) 
Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR 
Pt. Leflore, MS 
R. D. Bailey Lake, WV ., 
Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, Matawan and 
Union Beach Sections 
Ray Roberts Lake, TX 
Redbank & Fancher Creeks, CA 
Red Lake River, Polk County, Crookstown, MN (Sec 
14) 
Red River Basin Chloride Control (Area X) OK and 
TX 
Red River Below Denison Dam 
Completed or 
Scheduled for 
S Completion 
1987 
1993 
1994 
1994 
1990 
1985 
1991 
1995 
1995 
1995 
1988 
1999 
1986 
1988 
Indefinite 
1997 
1994 
1996 
Nature of Project 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Reservoir 
Local Protection 
Reservoir 
Reservoir 
Streambank Protection 
Indefinite Chloride Control 
1995 Levee & Streambank Protection 
B-9 
1991 
1948

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Project 
Reserve Sewage Lagoon, NM (Sec 14) 
Richmond, VA 
Rillioto River, AZ 
Rio de LaPlata, PR 
Rio Puerto Neuvo, PR 
Riverdale, West Springfield, MA 
River Raisin, MI (Sec 14) 
Roanoke River, Upper Basin, VA 
Rochester, MN 
Running Slough Ditch 
Sabana Grande, PR (Sec 205) 
Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA 
Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA 
Sacramento River Flood Control, CA 
Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction, CA 
Saginaw River, MI 
Salinas River, San Ardo, CA 
Sammamish River Restoration, WA (Sec 1135) 
San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX 
San Luis Rey River, CA....... 
Sanders Creek, Boscobel, MN (Sec 205) 
Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR (Sec 14) 
Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA 
San Vincente Arroyo, Silver Spring, NM 
Fiscal 
Year 
Started 
1986 
1989 
1994 
1995 
1994 
1994 
1993 
1990 
1987 
1990 
1987 
1963 
1963 
1918 
1990 
1965 
1993 
1994 
1957 
1988 
1992 
1993 
1990 
1988 
Placed in 
Useful 
Operation 
1989 
1995 
1995 
1990 
1989 
1979 
1995 
1993 
1988 
Fiscal Year 
Completed or 
Scheduled for 
Completion 
1987 
1995 
1997 
2003 
2007 
1996 
1996 
2000 
1995 
1990 
1990 
Indefinite 
Indefinite 
Indefinite 
1997 
Indefinite 
1993 
1995 
1997 
1997 
1996 
1994 
2000 
1988 
Nature of Project 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Fish Restoration 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
B-10 
I, 1. .. .

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Fiscal Year 
Project 
Santree Dam, SC (Sec 14) 
Savan Gut, VI (Sec 205) 
Saylersville, KY 
Saylorville Lake, IA 
Scotts Creek, Newberry, SC (Sec 205) 
Seneca Falls, NY (Sec 14) 
Sheyenne River, ND 
Sicily Island, LA, Levee 
Sidney, NE (Sec 205) 
Sims Bayou, TX 
Snake River, Alvarado, MN (Sec 205) 
Sogn, MN (Sec 14) 
Solomon Creek, Ashley, PA (Sec 14) 
Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD (Sec 14) 
Solomons Island, MD (Sec 14) 
Souris River Basin, ND 
Southern Blvd., Black's Arroyo, Rio Rancho, MN 
(Sec 14) 
South Shore Park, Milwaukee County, WI 
Southwestern Jefferson County, KY 
Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS 
Springbrook Creek, PA 
State Highway 111 Bridge, Lake Texoma, TX 
(Sec 14) 
Fiscal 
Year 
Started 
1995 
1987 
1991 
1965 
1986 
1995 
1990 
1983 
1993 
1990 
1993 
1995 
1992 
1992 
1992 
1985 
1994 
1992 
1974 
1988 
1989 
1992 
Placed in 
Useful 
Operation 
1995 
1989 
1977 
1995 
1994 
1995 
1993 
1993 
1993 
1995 
1993 
1983 
1990 
1994 
B-11 
Completed or 
Scheduled for 
Completion 
1995 
1990 
1998 
1996 
1988 
1995 
2000 
Indefinite 
1995 
2004 
1996 
1995 
1993 
1993 
1993 
1994 
1995 
1993 
1993 
1999 
1990 
1994 
Nature of Project 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Reservoir 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Shoreline Protection 
Reservoir 
Streambank Protection 
Shoreline Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Project 
State Road 44, Rio Salado, San Ysidro, NM (Sec 14) 
Steele Bayou, MS 
St. Francis Basin 
St. Hilaire, Riverside Cemetery, MN (Sec 14) 
St. Joseph River, MI (Sec 14) 
St. Paul, MN 
Sterling Center, Maple River, MN (Sec 14) 
Swan Creek, Taney County, MO (See 14) 
Sweetwater River, CA 
Tama, IA (Sec 205) 
Taylors Bayou, TX 
Taylorsville Lake, KY 
Ted Rhodes Golf Course, Nashville, TN 
Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant, LA 
Tensas Cocodrie, LA, Levee (s) 
Teton River near Choteau, Teton County, MT 
(Sec 14) 
Thomasville (Walnut Street), NC (Sec 14) 
Tombigbee River #6, Monroe County, MS 
Tombigbee River Tributaries, AL and MS 
Tongue River, State Park, Ranchester, WY (Sec 14) 
Town Brook, Quincy; MA 
Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV 
Tulsa and West Tulsa, OK 
~ 
B-12 
Fiscal 
Year 
Started 
1995 
1966 
1938 
1994 
1990 
1991 
1994 
1984 
1972 
1991 
1982 
1974 
1995 
1983 
1974 
1992 
1995 
1994 
1965 
1993 
1992 
1995 
1943 
Placed in 
Useful 
Operation 
1995 
(4) 
1994 
1995 
1995 
1995 
1986 
1993 
1994 
1983 
1995 
1987 
1993 
1995 
1990 
1994 
1945 
Fiscal Year 
Completed or 
Scheduled for 
Completion 
1995 
1999 
1999 
1995 
1995 
1995 
1996 
1986 
1993 
1996 
1995 
1990 
1995 
1996 
1992 5 
1993 
1996 
1995 
1996 
1994 
1997 
2004 
1993 6 
Nature of Project 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Tributary levees & channels 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Reservoir 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Riverbank Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Rehabilitation of Levee System

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Fiscal Year 
Fiscal Placed in Completed or 
Year Useful Scheduled for 
Started Operation Completion 
1989 1990 
Project 
Tunkhannock Creek, PA 
Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS 
Upper Scioto River, Marion County, OH (Sec 205) 
Upper Yazoo Projects, MS 
Village Creek, AL 
Wabasha County Hwy 11, MN (Sec 14) 
Walnut Creek, CA 
Waveland Seawall, Seawall, MS 
West Columbus, OH 
West Des Moines, IA 
West Ray, Marshall, PA (Sec 14) 
West Tennessee Tributaries 
Westwego to Harvey, LA 
Wheeler Creek, Gainesville, TX (Sec 205) 
White River, Batesville, AR (Sec 14) 
White River, Jacksonport, AR (Sec 205) 
White River, Newport, AR 
White River, St. Paul, AR 
Whiteman's Creek, AR 
Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR 
Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA 
Wild Rice River, Hendrum/Lee Townships Norman 
County, MN (Sec 205) 
Wolf River at 2nd Street, Memphis, TN (Sec 14) 1988 
1993 
1986 
1976 
1989 
1993 
1964 
1995 
1993 
1993 
1990 
1960 
1991 
1983 
1984 
1984 
1988 
1988 
1994 
1938 
1980 
1994 
1990 
1995 
1987 
2013 
1996 
1994 
1997 
1995 
2002 
1997 
1990 
Indefinite 1 
2005 
1984 
1986 
1986 
1989 
1990 
1997 
Indefinite 
1996 
1996 
1990 
Nature of Project 
Streambank Protection 
Channel Improvement 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Shoreline Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Drainage and Flood Control 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Streambank Protection 
Snagging and Clearing 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
1994 
1990 
1994 
1986 
1986 
1989 
1990 
1995 
1989 
B-13 
Local Protection

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Project 
Wyoming Valley, PA 
Yalobusha River Mile 7.5, MS 
Yatesville Lake, KY 
Yellowstone River, Livingston, MT (See 14) 
Yonkers (Nepera Park), NY 
Zintel Canyon, Kennewick, WA 
Fiscal 
Year 
Started 
1983 
1993 
1964 
1992 
1994 
1992 
Placed in 
Useful 
Operation 
1991 
1993 
1993 
1993 
Fiscal Year 
Completed or 
Scheduled for 
Completion 
1991 
1993 
1995 
1993 
1995 
1993 
Nature of Project 
Rehabilitation of levee system 
Streambank Protection 
Reservoir 
Streambank Protection 
Local Protection 
Local Protection 
B-14 
.

APPENDIX B 
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
SConstruction of further channel improvement was halted in 1987 due to the denial of water quality certification. 
Construction work currently underway includes the channel stabilization at bridge, utility and tributary crossings in the 
uncompleted portion of the project. 
2 Project was in useful operation before Corps started working on it. Work consists primarily of improvements to existing 
channels, levees, pumping stations and other flood control structures. 
3 Remaining recreation unscheduled. Lawsuit was resolved by a Consent Decree Feb 10, 1992. The Decree was for the City 
of Edmond and the Edmond Public Works Authority to reimburse the government $7,207,636 over a period of 40 years for 
the recreation contract and $16,253, 644 for the water supply contract over a period of 43 years. 
4 Item 2A temporarily deferred. 
5 Present work is for repair of the levee and pipes. 
B-15

APPENDIX B 
BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Project 
Atlantic Coast of Maryland 
Delaware Coast Protection, DE 
Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp, NJ 
Casino Beach, IL 
Duval County, FL 
East Rockaway to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY 
Emeryville, Alameda, CA (Sec 103) 
Fire Island to Joines Inlet, NY 
Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY 
Grand Isle, LA ' 
Great Egg Harbor Inlet & Peck Beach, NJ 
Homer Spit storm Damage Reduction, AK 
Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA 
Manatee County, FL 
Myrtle Beach, SC 
Palm Beach County, FL (Delray Beach) 
Pinellas County, FL (Indian Shores) 
Presque Isle Peninsula, PA (Permanent) 
Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island), NY 
Sandy Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT 
Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, Sec 1I 
Sarasota County, FL 
Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT 
Fiscal 
Year 
Started 
1990 
1989 
1990 
1995 
1994 
1979 
1993 
1988 
1963 
1991 
1992 
1994 
1992 
1995 
1992 
1992 
1990 
1994 
1990 
1994 
1994 
1990 
Placed in 
Useful 
Operation 
1994 
1990 
1991 
1993 
1992 
1994 
1993 
1995 
1991 
Incremental 
Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for 
Completion 
2043 
2021 
2031 
Indefinite 
1996 
Periodic 
1993 
Periodic 
Indefinite 
2043 
1995 
1995 
1993 
2047 
1992 
1993 
20424 
1995 
1995 2 
Indefinite 
1996 
B-16

APPENDIX B 
BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Fiscal Placed in Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for 
Year Useful Completion 
Project Started Operation 
Town of North Beach, MD 
Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement) 
1993 
1962 
1994 
1962 
1994 
1997 3 
B-17

APPENDIX B 
BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Emergency Repairs due to Hurricane Andrew as per FY 92 Dire Emergency Act authorization. 
Original authorized project completed in 1991. 
SFirst of scheduled 5-year Re-nourishment. 
3 Fiscal year 1994 is the first of 4 annual Re-nourishments. 
SFiscal Year 1995 was the third year of 50 years of nourishment. 
B-18

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Lodis IDs Audliiedonnel 
Depthon Sills 
Prjet Miles Cmmuy in Widh of Avail. Liftat Upper Lower Type LRIgth Year Len Defh Wdlh 
Above Vicy Chamnber Lagh for N al (fee) Opened (mi ) (fet) (fet) 
outh Widh Pool 
Level 
Alabo mCo saRivesAL 
ClaboL&D 
MilasFenyL&D 
JonesBtuffLodc 
Aleu enyRiver,PA andNY 
L&D No.2 
L&D No.3 
L&D No.4 
I&D No.5 
L&D No.6 
L&D No.7 
L&D No.8 
I.&D No.9 
anduxitRisGA,AL 
andFL 
fJm WooctuffI&D 
George W.AnhewsI&D 
WallrF.GeorgeL&D 
Alntitrcooast 
Wakr ay 
Ab andhea 
CanalRous 
81.82 Chixome,AL 
14232 Cam AL 
254.4 Be*iAL 
6.7 As InPA 
145 ChiswidcPA 
242 Naina, PA 
30.4 Fnepor1PA 
363 Clitii,PA 
45.7 KilanigPA 
52.6 Tnempletn, PA 
622 Rimer,PA 
107.6 hahood 
FL 
182. ibGA 
182.8' Forta GA 
84 
84 
84 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
600 
600 
600 
360 
360 
360 
360 
360 
360 
360 
360 
30 
45 
45 
11 
13 
10 
12 
12 
13 
18 
22 
82 450 33 
82 
82 
450 
450 
25 
88 
16 
16 
16 
11 
12 
9 
10 
11 
11 
14 
11 
13 Movable 
13 Movable 
13 Movable 
12 Fixed 
11 Fixed 
10 Fixed 
11 Fixed 
11 Fixed 
10 Fixed 
10 Fixed 
11 Fixed 
3,160' 1973 
9,900' 1969 
14,962' 1974 
1,393 1934" 
1,436 1934" 
876 1927 
780 1927 
1,140 1928 
916 1930 
984 1931 
950 1938 
14 14 Movable 5,924 1957 
19 
18 
13 M 620 1963 
13 Movable 13,371 1963 
605 9 200 
103.1 9 200 
88.0 9 200 
7.8 
9.7 
62 
5.9 
94 
6.9 
9.6 
9.8 
9 200 
9 200 
9 200 
9 200 
9 200 
9 200 
9 200 
9 200 
46.7 6 100 
285 6 100 
85.0 6 100 
11.56 Citi 72 530 3 16' 16 Nae 
VA 
C-i 
1932 12 90

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Locs DIns Atflxwed CiCl anne 
L h on Sills 
Prject Miles Conmun tyin Widh of Avail Lift at Upper Lowrx Type ' Ingtf Year l L~ph Width 
Above Vicinity Camnber Length for Nonal (ff) ened (miles) (feet) (feet) 
Mouth Widh Pool 
Lvel 
Dil Snalnp Canal Route 
Deep CMde lnck 
South Mills Lock 
10.6' Deep ek, VA 52 
332 South Mills,NC 52 
Bayou Teche, LA 
Bewik Lock 
Keystone Lock 
BDlack RockC hannd& 
Tonaida Haritor,NY 
Black Rodk Lock 
Black Warrior, Waniorand 
Tombigbee Rivers,AL 
Coffe evlle(Jackson) L&D 
Dm polis Lock 
Amlead L Sekien L&D 
Wmi. Baxon Oliver I&D 
Q f) 
(Replmt) 
Hok Lockauind Dam 
John Hollis Ba1krheadL&D 
v Lod) 
15' Bwck, LA 
725' New Iberia, LA 
0.0 Bffalo,NY 
116.6" Cofeeville, AL 
132" Demopolis, AL 
261.1 Eutaw AL 
3277 TuscaIOOSe, AL 
347.0" Holt, AL 
365.1 Adger, AL 
45 
36 
307 
162 
9
9 
9 None 
9 Fxed 
1950 
175 1913 
68 625 5 21.6 21.6 None 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
33 
40 
22 
28 
64 
68 
13 
13 
13 
18 
19 
13 
1914 
13 Movable 1,185 1965 
13 Fixed 1,485 1962 
13 Movable 1,832 1962 
18 Fixed 800 n/a 
13 Movable 1,138 1969 
13 Fixed 1,170 1975 
8 80 
345 6 50 
7.1 21 200 
96.6 9 200 
47.9 9 200 
77.0 9 200 
8.9 9 200 
18.1 9 200 
42.7 9 200 
Cape Fear River, NC 
L&D No. 1I 
L&D No.2 
William O. Hu ke L&D 
67.0 Kings Bluf NC 
99.0 BitowMns 
lingNC 
123.0 Tolas Laxding 
NC 
40 
40 
200 
200 
11 
9 
9 
12 
40 300 9 
9 Fixed 
12 Fixed 
9 9 Fixed 
275 1915 
229 1917 
220 1935 
32.0 8 100 
24.0 8 100 
20.0 8 100 
C-2 
300 
300 
12 
12 
12 
12 
12 None 
12 None 
1940 
1941 
6 50
6 50

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Lods ms Aulxxrii1dChanel 
Depth onSills 
Projec Miles Communty in Widthof Avail Lifat Upper Lower Type Length Year Ln De Widh 
Above Vicini Chamber Ingthfor Noanal (feet) pened (miles) (fet) (fet) 
Mc h Wdl Pbol 
Level 
Centaland Southemrn Floida 
S61 Lock 
S65 Lock 
S-65A Lox k 
&65B Lock 
&65C Lock 
S-193 
S65D nLockd 
S65ELock 
C nl and SouthraiHodda 
cn't 
S-31B 
5-310 
OiaoHartxr,IL 
CoiradoRIr 
E Lock 
WestLoc 
CoIo adoRi~erORand WA 
BatevL&.D 
DalasL&D 
John Dy L&D 
McNa yL&D 
0.0 StClokd,FL 
56.0 Fosivproo FL 
46.0 Avon Pik FL 
320 Sebrhing, FL 
25.0 SehingFL 
0.0 Okee bee, FL 
16.0 CkeedobeeFL 
120 OkeedeeFL 
3&8.7 tMayaa, FL 
0.0 Clewi i,FL 
0.0 C IL 
444.8 Magoith,TX 
444.8 ~ daTX 
146.0 Bmevil,OR 
190.0 TheDalle OR 
215.0 RuftsOR 
292.0 Umailb,OR 
30 
30 
30 
30 
30 
50 
30 
30 
56 
50 
90 
90 
90 
90 
90 
60 
90 
90 
400 
60 
2
6
6
6
7 
35 
6
5
14 
5 
80 600 4 
75 
75 
86 
86 
86 
86 
1200 
1,200 
675 
675 
675 
675 
59 
66 
88 
110 
75 
6
6
6
6
6 
7.5 
6
6 
14 
13 
6 None 
6 Ncne 
6 None 
6 None 
6 None 
75 None 
6 None 
6 None 
14 Movable 
13 Movrable 
23 23None 
15 
15~ 
20 
15 
15 
15 
1963 
1964 28.0 
1967 10.0 
1965 14.0 
1965 7.0 
1969 4.0 
1964 9.0 
1964 4.0 
1977 
1980 
1939 
1954 
1954 
is Nary 
15 None 
24 Movable 2,680 1992' 
15 Movable 8,735 1957 
15 Movable 5,900 1968 
20 Movable 7,365 1954 
5.0
5 
8 20 
3 30 
3 30 
3 30 
3 30 
6 60 
3 30 
3 30 
8 100 
6 50 
.15 21 470 
475 
25,0 
76.0 
64.0 
12 125 
12 125 
27 300 
14 250 
14 250 
14 250 
C-3

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Locks Darns Atid Cincul 
Defth ai Sills 
Project Miles Commnnity in Width of Avail Liftat Upper Lowver Type' L gth Year Len DeLh Widlh 
Above Vicinity Chamber Length for Noamal (feet) Opr n (miles) (fet) (feet) 
Mouth Widh Pol 
Level 
Cumberland River, KY and 
TN 
30.6 Kuttawa, KY 
148.7 Ashland City, 
TN 
Old Hickory L&D 162 Old Hickory,TN 
Cat1ell Hull EDam aid Reservor 313.5 Carthage TN 
Fox River, WI 
Dellae Lock 
DePe Dam 
LilieKauanLock 
Little Kaukauna Dam 
Rapide Cche Lock 
RideGoche Dan 
Kakaua 5th Lock 
Fox River, WI con't 
Kaulkar4thLock 
Kaukana3rd Lock 
Kalkan2nd Lock 
Kaukmias t lock 
KaikanaDam 
KakaaGuard Lock 
LitCtuleeC ombined Lock 
i er 
Upper 
Ltle Chule 2ixdLock 
LieChule Is(Guard) Lock 
7.1 [DePe, W1I 
72 De[1 WI 
13.0 Elfe WI 
13.1 FDl,WI 
192 WrigJtstovwn , 
WI 
193 Wri tovn, 
WI 
22.8 Kaukauna,WI 
23.1 Kaukaia, WI 
233 Kakaina, WI 
234 KaukaxiaWI 
23.6 Kakamia, W 
24.0 KaukaunaWI 
24.0 Kai kauna, WI 
25.4 LilleQue,WI 
254 tleChule, WI 
264 Lile Qhue, WI 
265 LileOuIe, WI 
800 
800 
400 
400 
57 
26 
60 
59 
36 146 9 
36 146 7 
36 146 8 
36 144 9 
144 
144 
144 
144 
11 
14 
14 
14 
10 12 
8 10 
9 10 
13 Movable 9,959 
12 Movable 801 
10 Movable 3,605 
13 Movable 1,138 
Movable 986 
Movable 588 
Movable 461 
7 9 
10 
10 
10 
11 
Movable 603 
147 
144 
144 
11 
11 
14 
7 
1964 
1959 
1957 
1973 
1936 
1929 
1938 
1926 
1934 
1930 
1898 
1879 
1879 
1903 
1883 
1931 
1891 
1879 
1879 
1881 
1904 
118.1 9 150 
675 9 150 
973 9 150I 
71.9 9 150 
5.9 6 100 
62 6 100 
3.6 6 100 
03 6 100 
02 6 100 
0.1 6 100 
02 6 100 
0.4 6 100 
1.4 6 100 
6 100 
6 100 
1.0 6 100 
0.7 6 100 
C-4 
Baidey Dam 
C1ea2m L&D 
110 
110 
84 
84 
37 
31 
35 
35 
40 
35 
36 
35 
35

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Lods Dans Audiied Chanel 
Deph onSills 
Projet Miles Commniy in Widhof Avail. Liftat Upper Lowr Type' Lengh Year Len Depl Widh 
Above Vicfly Canber Ltghfor Nomnnal (feet) Opened (miles) (fet) (feet) 
Madh Widlh PFbol 
Level 
LitChuleDam 26.6 Lil le,.WI Movable 562 1932 
(,cesLock 
Cehs i 
Apln4h1nc* 
Appeton3td Lodc 
MLodc 
MenaLha 
FmerBaLA 
F B~tiayWLodc 
273 Littluee ,W I 
274 Little ule, WI 
30.7 Applon, WI 
30.9 Arppleton, WI 
313 Appleton, WI 
31.6 Appletn, WI 
319 Appleton, WI 
322 Appk WI 
37.8 Meas a WI 
37.8 Mna a,WI 
19.01 InIrasialCiy, 
LA 
35 144 10 
35 144 8 
35 
35 
34 
144 
145 
145 
9
10 
10 
34 144 8 
84 600 
7 7 
8 8 
6
7
7
7 8 
Movable 654 
Movable 549 
Movable 691 
Movabl 401 
16 16 None 
1888 
1933 
1907 
1934 
1900 
1901 
1884 
1940 
1899 
1937 
1968 
34 6 100 
0.6 6 100 
03 6 100 
03 6 100 
5.1 6 100 
283 6 100 
12 125 
Gen n RrKY 
L&D No I 
L&D No.2 
Guffhibuooa1aWalmway 
Hav& 
A sLodc 
Bayu SaondLc 
9.1 SpxtlsvileKY 
63.1 CalouIKY 
92.6 NewOieai 
LA 
9T8O3Y" 1Ik~ w,,ILAA 
88.0 A ILA 
933 Mo ciLy, 
LA 
131.0" P LA 
84 
84 
12 
14 
75 640 
75 
75 
75 
425 
797 
1,158 
12 
15 
11 Fixed 
12 Fixed 
9 31' 31' None 
10' 
10' 
&e 
12 1 Nne 
13 137 None 
13' 13' Nrie 
56 800 1' 14' 14' Nave 
482 1956 
519 1956 
54.0 9 200 
454 9 200 
1923 
1934 
1956 
1954 
1952 
12 150 
12 125 
16 150 
16 150 
12 125 
C-5

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Locks Dans Authofizd Clannel 
De[lthon Sills 
Project Miles Community in Width of Avail Lifat Uper Lower Type' Length Year Len Deih Width 
Above Vicinity Chamber Length for Normal (feet) Oped (miles) (feet) (feet) 
Maoutd Width Pol 
Level 
Pot Allen lodc 2285 PortAllen, LA 84 1,198 45 14 14' None 1961 12 125 
CacasieLck 2385 LakeChes 75 1205 6 13 13 None 1950 16 200 
LA 
B7 Rivrfloodgales 
Hudson Riveer, NY 
Troy L&D 
Iliois Waterway, IL 
Pa L&D 
Poi &D 
Slaved Rod L&D 
Maseilles Lock 
M lles Damn 
Drecn Island Lock and Da n 
Braidon Road L&D 
Lockort Lock 
Th masJ. Brien L&D 
bisland RoueMI 
Cmokd River Lock and Weir 
KawhRiver, WV 
Winlield L&D 
Mamet L&D 
Lxmonc L&D 
askaskai Rive, IL 
Kaskaskia L&D 
Kmtudcy River, KY 
404.1" Freeport,TX 
153.8 Troy,NY 
802 BeaIstown, L 
157.7 Peoria,IL 
231.0 Uica, IL 
244.6 Marselles,IL 
247.0 Marseles IL 
2715 Monis IL 
286.0 Joliet, IL 
291.1 Lockport, l 
3265 Chicago, IL 
30.0 Ala isc,MI 
31.1 Wrnfiek,WV 
67.8 Mam, WV 
82.8 London, WV 
.8 Ellis CGove,IL 
75 15 15 None 
45 493 17 16 13 Fixed 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
1,000 
10 
11 
19 
24 
22 
34 
40 
2 
17.8 66 1 
56 
56 
56 
360 
360 
360 
84 600 
28 
24 
24 
16 
I6 
17 
19 
17 
18 
12 
14 
1943 
1,495 1917 
13 Movable 1,066 1939 
12 Movable 536 1939 
14 Movable 1,280 1933 
14 1933 
Movable 819 1933 
12 Movable 1,616 1933 
14 Movable 2,373 1933 
15 None 1933 
14 Movable 257 1960 
6.9 7.9 SSPWeir 83 
18 
18 
18 
1967 
12 Movable 834 1937 
12 Movable 707 1934 
12 Movable 707 1934 
32 18 11 Movale 130 1973 
12 125 
22 14 200 
77.5 
733 
13.6 
26.9 
24.6 
9 300 
9 300 
9 300 
9 300 
145 9 300 
5.1 9 300 
9 300 
6.9 9 300 
4.0 5 30 
36.7 9 300 
15.0 9 300 
7.8 9 300 
35.0 9 225 
C-6

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
[nc Ddms Ad QinOem e 
Dehahon Sills 
Ptojed Mils Coamunityki Wdhof Avail. Lifat Upper wer Type' LIngth Year Lm p Wdlh 
Above Vicinity Camber Lnghfor Nnomra l (feet)O pened (mils) (f) (fe) 
Wdh Pool 
Level 
4.0 Caolton, KY 
31.0 LodqactKY 
420 GetKY 
65.0 FiankitKY 
822 TytrmeKY 
962 HIghBridge 
KY 
117.0 HiJ ige, 
KY 
1399 CanpNelson, 
KY 
1575 Valey View, 
KY 
176.4 Ford,KY 
201.0 hvi, KY 
2209 Raemi,KY 
2399 Willow,KY 
249.0 HeieeagKY 
38 
38 
38 
38 
38 
52 
145 
145 
145 
145 
145 
147 
8
14 
13 
13 
15 
14 
52 147 15 
88 
9
6 
10 
9 
15 Fixed 
6 Fixed 
7 Fixed 
6 Fixed 
6 Fixed 
6 Fixed 
9 7 Fed 
52 146 19 11 6 Fixed 
52 148 17 11 7 Fixed 
L&DNo. I 
L&DNo.2 
L&DNo.3 
L&DNo.4 
L&DNo.5 
L&ADNo.6 
L&DNoT 7' 
I&DNo. 8 
I&DNo.9 
L&DNo. 10 
L&IX~JQ11~ 
L&DNo. 12" 
L&DNo. 13 
L&DNo. 14' 
148 
148 
148 
148 
148 
17 
18 
17 
18 
17 
9 
10 
10 
10 
9 
6 Fixed 
6 Fixed 
6 Fixed 
6 Fcixed 
6 Fixed 
424 
400 
465 
534 
556 
413 
1839 
1939 
1844 
1844 
1844 
1891 
350 1897 
257 1900 
362 1907 
472 
208 
240 
248 
248 
1907 
1906 
1910 
1915 
1917 
27.0 
11.0 
23.0 
172 
14.0 
20.8 
6 100 
6 100 
6 100 
6 100 
6 100 
6 100 
22.9 6 100 
17.6 6 100 
18.9 6 100 
24.6 
19.9 
19.0 
9.1 
9.6 
6 100 
6 100 
6 100 
6 100 
6 100 
ILae Wastii~on Ship Caural 
NianMtlizdenLodc 
L& 
SinraDLd 
NmSnn ARa 
OK 
~It LB&D 
13 Seatle,WA 
13 SeamWA 
103 AasasP 
AR 
80 
28 
760 
123 
110' 600 
26 
26 
335 29 Move 235 1916 
166 16 Movabl .235 1916 
30 16 15 Fved *4,577 1967 
17.0 34 150 
17.0 34 150 
3.0 9 250 
C-7 
52 
52 
52 
52 
52

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Locks Dams Auio amnel 
Ihei on Silts 
Poja Miles Conmunity in WKih of Avail Lift at Upper Lower Type' gth Year La De41 Wid d 
Above Vicinity Chnamber L~egthfor Nnmal (feet) Oxn (miles) (feet) (feet) 
Mouth Wilh Pool 
Level 
Wilbur D. MilkLod No. 2 133 Arkansas Post, I10 600 20 18 14 1%7 36.9 9 250 
AR 
Dim No. 2 
Joe Hamdin L&D(No. 3) 
Enmet O. Sanders 
L&D(No.4) 
L&DNo. 5 
David D. Teny L&D 
Muay L&D 
Toad Sudk Fry L&D 
Arthur V.Onmond 
L&DNo. 9 
iaranelle L&D 
OzCak-JeaTaylor Lock * 
James W. Trimble L&D N(o. 
13) 
W. D. Mayo L&D 
Robert S. KarL&Dand 
Resavor 
Webbers FalLl&sD 
hiLA&D 
New 6GrahamIAD 
405 Arkansasost 
AR 
502 Grady, AR 
66.0 Pine Bufl AR 
863 Redfield, AR 
108.1 LitadtleRodc,AR 
1254 Little Rodck, AR 
155.9 Conway,AR 
176.9 MariltonAR 
205.5 Russellville,AR 
256.8 Ozak,AR 
292.8 FortSmith, AR 
319.6 Fart Smith, AR 
3362 Sallisaw, OK 
366.6 Webbs Falls, 
OK 
401.4 Musagee~OK 
421.7 Inola,OK 
Movable *407 1968 
110 600 
110 
I10 
110 
I10 
110 
110 
110 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
20 18 14 Movable *6,111 1%8 
14 
17 
18 
18 
16 
19 
54 
110 600 34 
110 600 20 
110 
110 
600 
600 
21 
48 
110 600 30 
110 
110 
600 
600 
21 
21 
18 
18 
18 
18 
18 
18 
18 
14 Movable *5,745 1968 
14 Movable *7,455 1968 
14 Movable *8,890 1968 
14 Movable (3,930 1969 
14 Movable *1,580 1969 
14 Movable *1,505 1969 
14 Movable **1,81 %1969 
5 
18 15 Movable *12,48 1969 
0 
18 14 Movable *4,725 1969 
19 
18 
14 Movable 7,400 1970 
14 Movable 7,230 1970 
19 16 Movable 4,370 1970 
15 
15 
14 Movable 11,690 1970 
14 Movable 1,630 1970 
15.8 9 250 
203 
21.8 
173 
30.5 
21.0 
9 250 
9 250 
9 250 
9 250 
9 250 
28.6 9 250 
513 9 250 
36.0 9 250 
26.8 9 250 
16.6 9 250 
304 9 250 
34.8 9 250) 
202 9 150 
23.7 9 150 
C-8

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Lods DIms AutfxxiiXd Oael 
Deh oinS ills 
Project Miles Ccmniyin Width of Avail. Liftat Upper Lower Type' Length Year Len Deh Widfh 
Above Vicinity Chambe Lghfr Nomal (fee) Opned (miles) (fet) (feet) 
Molh Wdlh Pool 
Level 
MinsippiRier Betvween 
Ohio 
andMi~owiRwers 
L&D No. 27 
N~iRiver B~e 
Ni~Rierand 
Mkuiep~,MN 
L&DNo. 26~ 
Meu1 tie1 &D 
SedLoc 
L&DNo. 25 
L&DNo.24 
L&D No.22 
L&D No.21 
L&D No. 20 
L&D No.19 
L&D No.18 
L&DNo. 17 
L&ADNo. 16 
L&D No. 15 
L&D No.14 
L&DNo. 13 
L&D No.12 
L&D.11 
L&D No.10 
185.1" GraileCity, 1L 
202.9' Altn, IL 
200.8 Alton, IL 
200.8 Akan,IL 
241.4" Cap Au Gris, 
MO 
273.4 Ckksvil ,MO 
3012' Savten~ MO 
324.9" Quiny, IL 
3432" Ca1 MO 
3642" Keda IA 
4105" Buuiingki,IA 
437.1" NewBosm, IL 
4572 Maussie IA 
482.9 RockIsla IL 
493.1 Le CieIA 
4933" IClaireIA 
522.5" Clion,IA 
556.7 BelevueIA 
583.0" Dbuqui,IA 
615.1 GtberIA 
110 1,200 
110 600 
360 
110 1,200 
110 600 
110 600 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
100 
110 
110 
110 
80o 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
600 
600 
600 
600 
1,200 
600 
600 
600 
600 
360 
320 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
21 
24 
24 
24 
24 
16 15 Fixed 
19 
16 
23 
3,240 1953 
10 Movable 1,725 1938 
10 
18 Movable 1,160 1990 
Movable 600 1994 
15 19 12 Movable 1,29 1939 
15 
10 
10 
10 
38 
10 
8
9
16 
16 
11 
11 
11 
9
11 
8 
19 
18 
17 
15 
15 
17 
16 
17 
27 
27 
18 
21 
19 
17 
19 
15 
12 Movable 4,280 1940 
14 Movable 1,024 1938 
12 Movable 1,066 1938 
12 Movable 2,144 1936 
13 Fixed 4,434 1913 
14 Movable 1,350 1937 
13 Movable 921 1939 
12 Movable .1,099 1937 
11 Movable 1,203 1934 
11 
11 1922 
14 Movable 1,343 1939 
13 Movable 1,066 1939 
13 Movable 849 1938 
13 Movable 1,278 1937 
12 Movable 763 1937 
17.8 9 200 
385 9 300 
40.6 9 300 
32.0 9 300 
27.8 
23.7 
183 
21.0 
463 
26.6 
20.1 
25.7 
10.4 
292 
342 
263 
32.1 
32.8 
9 300 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
C-9

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Lods Dams Authoid A hanel 
Depth on Sills 
Prject Miles Community in Width of Avail. Lift at Uper Lower Type Length Year Len Deth With 
Above Vicinity Chamber Lgth for Normal (feet) Opened (miles) (fee) (eet) 
Mouth Width Pool 
leved 
647.9 Lynxvlle. IA 
6792" Gaioa, WI 
702.5 DEach, MN 
7143 Tn ipealeau, 
WI 
7285" Winona, MN 
738.1'" Min eska,MN 
752.8 Alma, WI 
796.9" Red Wing MN 
8152? H1aingMN 
847.6k Minneapolis,, 
MN
St Paul 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
56 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
400 
9
11 
8
7
6
9
7
8
12 
38 
16 
22 
18 
17 
18 
18 
17 
17 
13 
13 Movable 811 1937 
14 Movable 935 1937 
12 Movable 940 1937 
13 Movable 893 1936 
13 Movable 682 1936 
12 Movable 1,619 1935 
13 Movable 1,367 1935 
14 Movable 365 1938 
13 Movable 822 1930 
8 Fixed 574 1932 
St Anthony Fals 
LoerL&D 
UppeAL&D 
8533" Minneapolis, 
MN 
853.9" Minneapolis, 
MN 
56 400 25 14 10 Movable 188 1956 
56 400 49 16 14 Fixed 3,584 163 
0.6 9 100 
3.8 9 100 
Mononphedriver,PAand 
L&D No.2 
L&D No.3 
L&D No.4 
Maxwelll&D 
112 Braddock,PA 
23.8 Elizabeth, PA 
415 Monessh, PA 
612 Maxwell, PA 
56 
110 
56 
56 
56 
56 
84 
84 
360 
720 
360 
720 
360 
720 
720 
720 
9
9
8
8
17 
17 
20 
20 
16 
16 
12 
12 
20 
20 
21 
21 
16 Fixed 748 1951 
16 19533 
12 Fixed 670 1907 
12 1907 
11 Movable 535 1932 
11 1932 
15 Movable 460 1964 
15 1964 
12.6 9 300 
17.7 9 300 
19.7 9 300 
23.8 9 300 
C-10 
L&DNo. 9 
L&D No.8 
L&D No 7 
L&D No.6 
L&D No. 5A 
L&D No. 5 
L&D No.4 
L&D No.3 
L&D No.2 
LA&D No 1 
313 
233 
11.8 
142 
9.6 
14.7 
44.1 
183 
32.4 
5.7 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS 
9 NS

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Lods Das Authoried Chamel 
DephonSils 
Projet Miles Cimuniyin Wlhof Avail. Liftat Upper ower Type' Length Year L De Wdh 
Above Viciny anber L for Naal (feet) Opened (miles) (fee) (feet) 
Mcth Widh Pool 
ILevel 
F~ldhdL&D 
cdL&D 
OhioRiver 
L&D No. 53 
L&D No.52 
SmithadIAD 
I.t&D 
NewughIAD 
CarElloL&D 
MAL&D 
L&D 
M~lphin ID 
so820 ayslad~g 
PA 
90.8 PoitMaion, 
PA 
102.0 Morgaown, wv 
108A0 Mor gpnyown, wy 
115.4 MWoVrgaiovn, 
18.4 Mcoud Cy, IL 
42.1 1Btookxrt, IL 
353 Smihla;, KY 
135.0 UniorioiKY 
204.9 Newbugh,IN 
2603 Camnkii, IN 
3742 Laisville,KY 
449.5 Makha4IN 
84 
84 
84 
84 
84 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
56 
110 
720 
720 
600 
660000 
600 
1,200 
600 
1,200 
1,200 
1,200 
1,200 
600 
1,200 
600 
1,200 
600 
600 
360 
1,200 
15 
19 
17 
21 
22 
12 
12 
12 
12 
22 
22 
22 
22 
16 
16 
25 
25 
37 
37 
37 
35 
27 
16 
18 
14 
18 
15 
15 
15 
15 
34 
34 
34 
34 
32 
32 
38 
38 
49 
19 
19 
50 
18 Fixed 576 
16 Movable 560 
15 Movable 410 
15 Movable 530 
14 Movale 366 
10 Movable 3,978 
10 Temp 1980 
11 Movable 3,073 
11 Temp 
Lock 
12 Movable 3,560 
12 
12 Movable 3,516 
12 
16 Movale 2,272 
16 
13 Movable 1,965 
13 
12 Movable 8,627 
11 
11 
15 Movable 1,395 
1993 
1925w 
1950 
1959 
1964 
1929 
1928 
1969 
1980 
1975 
1975 
1972 
1961 
1921 
1930 
1963 
8.8 
112 
6.0 
7.4 
7.0 
9 300 
9 300 
9 300 
9 300 
9 300 
23.7 9 300 
35.8 9 300 
99.7 
69.9 
554 
9 300 
9 300 
9 300 
1163 9 400 
753 9 300 
953 9 300 
C-11

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
lIds Dams Auttcined Chanel 
Deth on Sills 
Project Miles Community in Widh of Avail. Lift at Upper Lner Type ' [g th Year Ln De Wtlh 
Above Vicinitv CGham r L th for Ncrmal (fee) ed (miles) (feet) (feet) 
Moudh WiCdh Podl 
Level 
Cpt Anthiy Meklal L&D 
Greeup L&D 
Robert C. Byrd L&D 
Racine L&D 
Belev lleI&D 
Wllow Island L&D 
Haini~bel L&D 
Pie sland LAD 
New CumQtend L&D 
Mongmxiery Island L&D 
Dshieds L&D 
Eisworth L&D 
544.8 ChiloxOH 
610.0 Gr nup. KY 
701.8 HogsetWV 
7435 LaetatFalls OH 
777.1 Reesvill OH 
8193 Wavury, WV 
854.6 New 
Matille, 
WV 
8%.7 Wawood, WV 
926.6 Stianton,OH 
9493 rdu y, PA 
%7.7 Gewilad, PA 
974.8 Emsw rth, PA 
Okeechobee Waterway, FL 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
56 
110 
56 
110 
56 
56 
600 
1200 
600 
1200 
600 
1200 
600 
1200 
600 
1200 
600 
1200 
600 
1200 
600 
1,200 
600 
1,200 
600 
600 
360 
600 
360 
600 
360 
360 
35 
30 
30 
30 
30 
23 
23 
22 
22 
22 
22 
20 
20 
21 
21 
21 
21 
21 
21 
18 
18 
10 
10 
18 
18 
18 
50 
45 
45 
45 
45 
18 
18 
37 
37 
375 
35 
358 
38 
3817 
17 
17 
17 
176 
16 
163 
1133 
17 
16 
16 
15 1%3 
15 Movable 1.756 1%2 
15 
15 Movable 1287 1%2 
15 
15 Movable 1.132 1992 
15 
15 Movable 1202 1970 
15 
15 Movable 1206 1969 
15 
15 Movable 1,128 1973 
15 
17 Movable 1,098 1972 
17 
18 Movable 1306 1%5 
18 
15 Movable 1315 1%1 
15 
15 Movable 1379 1936 
15 
18 Fixed 1,585 1929 
18 
13 Movable 1,717 1921 
13 
13 
952 
61.8 
41.7 
33.6 
36.4 
353 
36.0 
29.9 
22.7 
18.4 
7.1 
9 300 
9 300 
C) 3(X00 
9 300 
9 300 
9 300 
9 1,000 
9 300 
9 300 
9 300 
9 300 
9 300 
62 9 300 
C-12

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
LDks Dams Authinzd Oam el 
Deh onSils 
Project Miles Comuntyin Wdhof Aval Li Upp Type' Igh Year I De Widl 
Above Viciniy C nber Lnglfor Nmal (feet) O (miles) (feet) (feet) 
Mah Width Pool 
IRvel 
15.1 StuatFL 
78.0 Moaoe Haven, 
FL. 
OIlKaI&D 93.6 LaBelle, FL 
W.P.FlanidhLodk&Conlm 121.4 FortMyersFL 
StiucLue 
50 
50 
50 
56 
250 
250 
250 
400 
13 
2
11 
3 
14 
10 
12 
14 
12 Movable 170 1941 
11 None 1953 
11 Movable 104 1937 
14 Movable 1,150 1965 
OklRiverA 
Old River Ld 304.0 Sn mespz1LA 75 1,200 35 11 11 None 
AR &LA 
klL&D(BkkRV~) 
Coknb D (ci 
Ri ) 
H. K ThitcherLoc 
(c Rivr)Fels Thal 
LockI 
Lock21 
Lock 3 
Re srWafrn ay 
LidCh Bi~ogsLock 
JohIl{ O t aLodz 
Lod3 
25.0 JnesvilLA 
1172 Combia,LA 
281.7 Calicii,AR 
226.8 Felsitial,AR 
29.4" P1aiRiver,LA 
40.T Bush,LA 
43.97 Sun, LA 
43.8 Marksvi&lLA 
865 Alexandria,LA 
141.0 Colfx, LA 
84 
84 
600 
600 
84 600 
30 
18 
18 14 Movable 450 1972 
18 13 Fcixed 400 1972 
12 18 13 Movale 350 1984 
84 600 13 18 13 Movable 350 1984 
65 
65 
65 
84 
84 
84 
310 
310 
310 
685 
685 
685 
26.7 
15 
11 
36 
24 
31 
10 
10 
10 
10 None 
10 None 
10 None 
1951 
1951 
1951 
22 13 Movable 550 1984 
235 15 Movable 300 1987 
25 18 Movable 360 1991 
922 9 100 
1062 9 100 
503 9 100 
552 9 100 
11.1 7 
32 7 
132 7 
80 
80 
80 
442 9 200 
743 9 200 
525 9 200 
C-13 
St Lucie[ AD 
NIOv HaenLoc 
15.1 8 
15.6 8 
15.6 8 
7.9 8 
80 
90 
90 
90 
1963 12 125

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Lacks Ds AiondCannel 
DepthonSills 
Poje Miles Commtniy Widhof Avail. Liftat Upper Lower Type' Length Year Len Widh 
Abov Viciy nber Ph fr Namal (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) 
Mouh Widlh Pbol 
Level 
10dc4 206 Couhala,1A 84 5685 25 25 18 Movable 349 1944 41.5 9 200 
Jow S. Q fm 247.5 S LAeo rt 84 685 25 25 18 No al 349 1994 36.0 9 200 
SmenItoRiwr,CA 
BagCanalLock 
Snake Rive-,WA 
keHatx rL&D 
LieGooseL,&D 
Lo GnnLe&D 
Loma Mnun L&D 
St. Mary's River, MI 
South Caal 
Mabe tLock 
Nolh Canal 
Davis Lock 
SaliLock 
Samh,GA 
New SavaniBkiffl&D 
428 West 
CA 
9.7 
703 
1075 
41.6 
P cuWA 
Staudc WA 
R maiy, WA 
KkatL ts, WA 
47.0 Sault Ste.Marie 
MI 
47.0 Saumlt Se Marie 
MI 
47.0 SaultS~ Maie, 
MI 
47.0 SadtSte Maie, 
1MI 
1872 Augusi, GA 
86 600 4 
86 
86 
86 
86 
675 
675 
675 
675 
100 
101 
100 
98 
13 13 None 
15 
15 
15 
15 
20 Movabe 
20 Movabl 
20 Movabl 
20 Movabe 
1961 
1961 
1970 
1975 
1969 
80 800 22 31 31 None 
110 1,200 
80 1,350 
80 1,350 
22 32 32 None 
22 24 23 None 
22 24 23 Noe 
15 13 120 
41.6 
372 
38.0 
28.1 
14 
14 
14 
14 
250 
250 
250 
250 
1943 27 
1968 
1914 
1919 
56 360 15 14 12 Movable 360 1936 162 9 90 
C-14

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Ldcs Dms ~Adiz~dOanel 
DepthonSils 
Poject Miles Commniyin Widhof Avail. Liat UperLowe Type Length Year iLn Depth Wdli 
Abo~v Vicinity Cnber Lighfor Nonal (ie) Opened (miles) (fee) (f~e) 
Mouth Widh Pool 
TeeeeRiverT,TAL, 
MS, 
andKY" 
KendL&D 
Pidwkk~agL&D 
AuxyLodc 
ManLodc 
22.4 Gl bertsville,KY 110 
206.7 HanbugTN 
206.7 Hambig, TN 
110 
110 
600 56 
600 
1,000 
55 
55 
11 13 Taina 7,976 1944 1843 9 300 
10 
10 
13 Bulkhead 7,385 1937 
13 Bulkhead 7,385 1984 
52.7 9 300 
527 9 300 
WatenwayComecing 
TombigeeandTenneee 
Rives, ALmaodMS 
GaiesvleI&D 
AlicevilleLI&D 
Coklnls IA&D 
AbetdenIL&D 
LockA& Spiliway 
Lo&B&Sp11way 
LodcC& Spillway 
LodIcD& Spilway 
L xcE& Spillway 
BaySpuigsl&D 
49.1 GavileAL 
89.8 Alioeville, AL 
117.6 ColumbusMS 
140.4 Ab~rdea,MS 
154.1 Amy,MS 
1593 Smihville AL 
174.0 Fulon, MS 
181.4 Fulton, MS 
189.7 Belmn MS 
194.9 Tupelo,MS 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
110 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
600 
36 
27 
27 
27 
30 
25 
25 
30 
30 
84 
15 
15 
15 
15 
15 
18 
18 
18 
18 
18 
15 Movable 15,460 1978 
15 Movable 14,790 1979 
15 Movable 10,040 1981 
15 Movable 10,640 1984 
15 Movable - 1985 
18 Movable - 1985 
18 Movable - 1985 
18 Movable - 1985 
18 Movable - 1985 
18 None 10,640 1985 
49.1 9 300 
40.7 9 300 
27.8 9 300 
22.8 9 300 
13.7 9 300 
14.7 9 300 
7.4 9 300 
83 9 300 
52 9 300 
645 9 300 
Wilamette River at 
Falls, OR 
LockNo. 1 
LockNo.2 
LckNo.3 
LockNo.4 
26.0 cgnCity,OR 40 
26.0 OregonCity, OR 40 
26.0 OregonCity,OR 40 
26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 
210 20 
210 10 
210 10 
210 10 
8 None 
8 None 
8 Nae 
8 None 
C-15 
1872 
1872 
1872 
1872 
6 150

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Locks a11s Atori~ annel 
Depth on Sills 
Prjec Miles Community in Widlh of Avail Lifat Upper Lower Type Legth Year Len Dqph Width 
Above Vicinity Chamber Legth for Normal (feet) Opned (miles) (t) (feet) 
Moh Widh Pool 
Level 
Ga Lck 26.4 OregonCity, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 23.6 6 
C-16

APPENDIX C 
NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Fixed; crest without gates or other facility to control streamflow. Movable; includes any type of crest gates. tgaaintetse,r wickets, or 
others to control streamflow. 
Above mouth of Mobile River. 
' Includes length of earth dikes. 
From mouth of Apalachicola River. 
SFrom mouth of Chattahoochee River. 
6 Above Norfolk, VA. 
SWith reference to mean low water, or low mean Gulf as case may be. 
8 From Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. 
99 Average high and low water conditions, lift varying widely, depending on tides and river stages. 
0 From foot of Government Street, Mobile, AL. 
1 From mouth of St. Johns River. 
12 Above Head of Passes. 
13 From New Orleans, LA. 
14 Salt water barrier in down position. Will clear 15-foot vessels in normal position. 
SAbove the Ohio River. 
6 Channel completed to depth of 6.5 feet. 
17 From mouth of West Pearl River. 
18 Tennessee River locks operated by the Corps, dams operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority. 
1 300-foot width from lock to mouth of Clinch River and 175-foot width upstream from lock to Clinton, TN. 
20 Dates shown represent replacement structures. 
21 Dates shown represent reconstruction for locks and dams Nos. 2-8 inclusive. 
22 Dam was rebuilt in 1959. 
23 Old 110' X 358' lock replaced in 1957. 
24 Inoperable, caretaker status September 7, 1982. 
251 noperable, caretaker status October 1, 1981. 
26 Lock and Dam 26 has been removed and replaced by Melvin Price Locks and Dam 
* Includes length of left and right embankments 
** Includes length of left embankment 
C-17

APPENDIX D 
NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Fiscal Year 
Fiscal Placed in Completed or 
Year Useful Scheduled for 
Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project 
Agat Small Boat Harbor, Guam (Sec 107) 
AIWW B Replacement of Federal Hwy Bridges in NC 
Aquadilla Harbor, PR (Sec 107) 
Aunt Lydia=s Cove, Chatham, MA (Sec 107) 
Baltimore Harbor (50 foot), MD & VA 
Bayou LaBatre, AL 
Bonneville Navigation Lock, OR & WA 
Brazos Island Harbor, TX 
Burns Habor, IN 
Canaveral Harbor Deepening, FL 
Canaveral Harbor, FL 
Channel to Newport News, VA (1965 Mod.) 
Channel to Newport News, VA (1986 Mod.) 
Channel to Victoria, TX 
Charleston Harbor, SC 
Chicago Harbor (Lock), IL 
Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, 
Hammond, OR 
Columbia River (DDA), Vancouver, WA (Sec 107) 
Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 
Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, IN 
and KY 
Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VW 
Fort Pierce Harbor, FL 
Freeport Harbor, TX 
1987 
1974 
1993 
1995 
1987 
1993 
1985 
1992 
1995 
1993 
1994 
1967 
1987 
1993 
1988 
1995 
1991 
1994 
1972 
1984 
1988 
1995 
1987 
1989 
1986' 
1995 
1990 
1995 
1968 
1989 
1994 
1994 
1990 
1988 
1989 
1999 
1995 
1995 
1993 
1997 
1997 
1996 
1996 
1994 
1995 
Indefinite 
Indefinite 
1998 
1996 
1997 
Indefinite 
1996 
1996 
1995 
1988 
1996 
1994 
Dredging and breakwater 
Replacement of existing bridges 
Breakwater 
Dredging channel and anchorage 
Deepdraft channel deepening 
Channel Dredging 
New larger lock 
Enlarging and Deepening Deep Draft Channel 
to 42 foot depth 
Dredging and Breakwater 
Navigation Channels 
Jetty extension and sand tightening 
Deferred anchorage construction 
Dredge 50 ft. Channel. Deepen to 55 feet 
Enlarging and deepening channel to 12 foot 
depth 
Dredging and channel wideningand deepening 
Lock Bulkhead Fabrication 
Construction of support structure 
Anchorage Construction 
Dredging 
Protection of a National Natural Landmark 
Dredging 
Enlarge entrance channel 
Dredging, jetty construction, and recreation 
D-1

APPENDIX D 
NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Fiscal Year 
Fiscal Placed in Completed or 
Year Useful Scheduled for 
Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project 
Grays Harbor, WA 
Grays Harbor, Point Chihalis. WA (Sec 111) 
Grays Landing Lock & Dam (Lock & Dam 7) 
Monongahela River, PA 
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Brazos River Floodgates, 
River, YX (Major Rehab) 
Gulf'Intracoastal Waterway, Sargent Beach, TX (Sec 216) 
Gulfport Harbor, MS 
Helena Harbor, AR 
Hempstead Harbor, NY 
Illinois Waterway Four Locks 
Kill Van Kull - Newark Bay, NJ and NY (Stage 1) 
Kodiak Harbor, AK 
Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, HI 
Lock and Dams 3, 5A, 6,7,8 and 9, MN, WI and IA 
Lock and Dam 13, IL 
Lock and Dam 15, IL 
McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR 
Manatee Harbor, FL 
Melvin Price Lock and Dam, MO 
Miami Harbor Channel, FL 
Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers 
1990 
1995 
1986 
1994 
1993 
1991 
1989 
1992 
1993 
1986 
1993 
1988 
1989 
1993 
1993 
1963 
1995 
1974 
1991 
1994 
1988 
1938 
1934 
1970 
1990 
1998 
1996 
1995 
1996 
1998 
1994 
1995 
1995 
1996 
1995 
1996 
1988 
1999 
1996 
1996 
2000 
1995 
1997 
1995 
Navigation channel widening and deepening 
Shore Damage Mitigation 
Construct new lock & damn to replace existing 
lock & dam 7 
Major Rehabilitation to east gate guidewall 
Construction of revetment to protect Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway 
Deepen Channel 
New Slackwater Harbor 
Removal of derelect barges 
Major rehabilitation of locks and dams 
Deepdraft channel - widening and deepening 
to 40 ft 
Breakwater and navigation channel widening 
Breakwater 
Major rehabilitation of electrical/mechanical 
systems 
Major rehabilitation of lock and dam 
Major rehabilitatino of lock and dam 
Locks and dams 
Enlarge turning basin, construct wideners, 
mitigation 
Replacement 
Navigation Channels & Turning Basin 
D-2 
.. .

APPENDIX D 
NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Fiscal Year 
Fiscal Placed in Completed or 
Year Useful Scheduled for 
Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project 
IL and MO 1910 2000 Regulating works 
Mississippi River, Ship Channel, Gulf to 
Baton Rouge, LA 1987 
Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS 
and MO 
North Pass-Pass Manchac, LA (107) 
Morro Bay, CA 
Mouth of Colorado River, TX (Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway) 
Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, HI 
New York Harbor, NY and NJ 
Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1965 Mod.) 
Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1986 Mod) 
Norfolk Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel, VA 
Oakland Harbor, CA 
Olmsted Locks and Dam, IL & KY 
Ouachita and Black River, AR and LA 
Pascagoula Harbor, MS 
1987.2 
1992 
1995 
1995 
1984 
1985 
1976 
1966 
1987 
1987 
1987 
1992 
1964 
1994 
Indefinite 3 Dredging 55-foot channel 
2007 
1995 
1994 
1987 
Incremental 
1967 
1989 
1989 
1984 
1996 
1996 
1995 
1987 
Indefinite 
Indefinite 
Indefinite 
Indefinite 
1997 
2007 
Indefinite 
1996 
Mitigation of fish and wildlife 
losses from construction and operation of 
Missouri 
River Bank Stabliazation and Navigation 
Project 
9=x130= barge channel 
Modification of existing harbor by extending 
deepening and widening the outer channel, 
Breakwaters, dredging, and recreation 
Breakwater repair 
Removal of drift sources 
Deferred anchorage const. 
Dredge 50 ft. channel and deepen to 55 feet 
Dredge outbound element and deepen to 55 
feet 
Channel deepening and widening turning 
basin 
Navigation 
Replacement of six locks and dams, channel 
deepening to 9 feet and realignment 
Channel dredging and construction of a new 
D-3

APPENDIX D 
NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Fiscal Year 
Fiscal Placed in Completed or 
Year Useful Scheduled for 
Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project 
turning basin 
Point Marion, Lock & Dam 8, Monongahela River, PA 
Port of Florence, AL 
Provincetown Harbor, MA (Sec 107) 
Red River WW, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA 
Richmond Harbor, CA 
Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, Ohio River 
Rudee Inlet, VA 
Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA 
San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA 
San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and 
Stockton Ship Channels) 
Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demonstration Project, CA 
Savannah Harbor Deepening, GA 
Savannah Harbor Widening, GA 
Shinnecock Inlet, NY 
Sitka Harbor, AK 
St. George Ch annel Extension, AK 
Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) 
Tenn River, Port of Florence 
Thimble Shoal Channel, VA 
Toussant River, Caroll Twsp., OH (Sec 107) 
1986 
1994 
1995 
1974 
1985 
1985 
1990 
1986 
1991 
1971 
1993 
1993 
1990 
1990 
1993 
1994 
1976 
1994 
1987 
1991 
1994 
1995 
19844 
1992 
1991 
1989 
1995 
1996 
Indefinite s 
Being Determined 
1999 
1991 
Being Determined 
1996 
Being Determined 
1997 
1994 
1992 
1995 
1997 
1996 
1987 
1995 
Indefinite 
Being Determined 
Replaces existing 56x360' lock chamber with 
new 84'x720' chamber 
Channel Dredging 
Dredging channel 
Lock and dam construction. Channel 
improvement and realignment 
Channel deepening and turning basin 
Replacement of existing locks and major 
rehabilitation of the dam 
Dredge 7 foot channel 
Deep draft channel, widening and deepening 
Dredging, weir and breakwater 
Deep draft channel, widening, deepening and 
dredging 
Restoration of Tidal Wetlands on a 348 acre 
site 
Channel deepening 
Widening channel 
Dredging and repair of jetties 
Navigation Channel 
Dredging 
Dredging 
Channel Improvements 
Dredge 50 ft outbound element and dredge to 
55 feet 
Dredging 
D-4 
.... r... 
........

APPENDIX D 
NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Fiscal Year 
Fiscal Placed in Completed or 
Year Useful Scheduled for 
Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project 
Umpgua River, Winchester Bay, OR (Sec 111) 1995 1995 1995 Dredging 
Ventura Harbor, CA 
Wallisville Lake, TX 
Westport-Puget Island, OR & WA (Sec. 107) 
Winfield Locks and Dam, Kanawha River, WV 
1993 
1967 
1994 
1990 
1994 
1994 
1998 
1996 
1997 
Dredging; breakwater and groin construction 
Multipurpose lake (navigation, salinity 
control, water supply, fish & wildlife, & 
recreational) 
Channel Excavation 
Construction of new lock 
D-5

APPENDIX D 
NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995 
Walter Jones, Joseph P. KNn app and Core Creek completed; Hobucken construction started and land acquisition is underway for Fairfield. 
2 Phase 1, forty-five foot channel to New Orleans, LA. Forty-five foot channel to Mile 181 (Donaldsonville, LA) placed in useful operation 
1988. Phase II, forty-five foot channel from mile 181 to Baton Rouge placed in useful operation in 1994. 
3 Awaiting further PCA's to go deeper than 45 feet. 
4 Lock and Dam No. 1 placed in useful operation in 1984. Lock and Dam No. 2 in 1987. and Lock and Dam No. 3 in 1992. Lock and Dam 
and 5 in 1994. 
5 Schedule for completion of entire project is indefinite. Hower, the project opened to 9-foot navigation on 31 December 1994. 
D-6 
in 
Nos. 4

APPENDIX E 
MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 
OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Flood Control 
Total and/or Nay. 
Storage Feature Placed Initial Existing Ultimate 
Commnity in Capability in Useful Power in Installation Installation Project Heig 
Project River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY FY (KW) (KW) Functions Type2 (feel
ht Length 
t) (feet) 
Albeni Falls, ID Pend Oreille Newport,WA 1,153,000 
Allatoona Lake,GA Etowah Cartersville,GA 670,000 
Barkley Dam & Lake Cumberland Frand Rivers, 2,082,000 
Barkley, KY & TN KY 
Beaver Lake, AR White Eureka Springs, 1,952,000 
Big Bend Dam (Lake Missouri Chamberlain,S 1,883,000 
Sharpel), SD D 
Blakely Mountain Ouachita Mt. Pine, AR 2,768,000 
Dam-Lake Ouachita 
Bonneville L&D Lake Columbia Bonneville,OR 537,000 
Bonneville, OR & WA 
Broken Bow Lake, OK Mountain Broken Bow, 1,368,230 
Fork OK 
Buford Dam, Lanier, Chattahooche Buford, GA 
GA e 
Bull Shoals Lake AR White 
2,554,000 
MountainHome 5,408,000 
& MO 
Clarence Cannon Dam Salt Perry, MO 1,428,000 
Carters Dam, GA Coosawatte Carters, GA 472,756 
Center Hill Lake, TN Caney Fork Lancaster,TN 2,092,000 
Cleatham L&D, TN Cumberland Ashland City, 104,000 
TN 
Chief Joseph Dam, 
(Rufus Woods 
Lake),WA 
Columbia Bridgeport, WA 593,000 
1952 
1950 
1964 
1963 
1964 
1953 
1938 
1968 
1956 
1952 
1983 
1975 
1948 
1952 
1955 
1955 
1950 
1966 
1965 
1965 
1956 
1938 
1970 
1957 
1953 
1985 
1975 
1951 
1958 
1956 
42,600 42,600 NFPR C 90 
74,000 74,000 FPRW C 190 
130,000 130,000 NPFR CE 157 
112,000 112,000 FPSR CE 228 
468,000 468,000 FPRIW E 95 
75,000 
1,055 
1,250 
9,959 
2,575 
10,570 
75,000 FPRW E 235 1,100 
1,145,700 1,145,700 NPR C 122 2,690 
100,000 100,000 FPWSR E 225 2,750 
86,000 86,000 NFPW E 192 5,400 
340,000 340,000 FPR C 258 2,256 
58,000 58,000 FNPRSW CE 138 
500,000 500,000 FPRW ER 450 
135,000 135,000 FPR CE 250 
36,000 36,000 NPR C 75 
2,457,384 2,457,384 PIR C 230 
1,700 
1,950 
2,160 
801 
5,998 
E-1

APPENDIX E 
MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 
OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Flood Control 
Total and/or Nay. 
Storage Feature Placed Initial Existing Ultimate 
Commnity in Capability in Useful Power in Installation Installation Project Heig 
Project River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY FY (KW) (KW) Functions Type2 (feel 
Cooper River, Santee St. Stephen, SC 2,560,000 N/A 1985 84,000 84,000 NPW CE 86 
Charleston Harbor, SC 
Cordell Hull L&D, TN 
Cougar Lake, OR 
Dale Hollow Lake, TN 
& KY 
Dardanelle L&D, AR 
DeGray Lake, AR 
Denison Dam(Lake 
Texoma), TX & OK 
Detroit Lake, OR, 
including Big Cliff 
Lake, OR 
Dworshak Dam & 
Reservoir, ID 
Eufaula Lake, OK 
Fort Gibson Lake 
Fort Peck Lake, MT 
Fort Randal Dam Lake 
Francis (Case), SD 
Garrison Dam ( Lake 
Sakakawea), ND 
Carthage, TN 
Blue River, OR 
Celina, TN 
Dardanelle, AR 
Arkadelphia, 
AR 
Denison, TX 
Mill City, OR 
Orofino, ID 
Eufaula, OK 
Ft. Gibson, OK 
Glasglow, MT 
Lake Andes, 
SD 
Riverdale, ND 
310,900 
219,000 
1,706,000 
486,200 
831,900 
5,194,163 
461,000 
3,453,000 
3,825,400 
1,284,400 
18,909,000 
5,574,000 
24,137,000 
1973 
1963 
1943 
1969 
1969 
1944 
1953 
1972 
1964 
1952 
1938 
1953 
1954 
1974 
1964 
1949 
1965 
1972 
1945 
1954 
1973 
1964 
1953 
1944 
1954 
1956 
100,000 100,000 
25,000 64,600 
54,000 54,000 
124,000 124,000 
68,000 108,000 
70,000 
NPR CE 93 
NFPRI ER 445 
FPR C 200 
NPR C 
FNPRS E 
ht Length 
t) (feet) 
876 
1,306 
1,738 
1,717 
68 2,683 
243 3,400 
175,000 FPRSN E 165 17,200 
118,000 118,000 NFPRI C 382 1,528 
400,000 620,000 PNFR CG 717 3,300 
90,000 
45,000 
90,000 
67,500 
FNPS CE 
FP CE 
185,250 185,250 NFPRIW E 
320,000 320,000 NFPRIW E 
114 3,200 
110 2,990 
251 21,026 
165 10,700 
430,000 430,000 NFPRIW E 210 11,300 
E-2 
Cumberland 
S.Fork 
McKenzie 
Obey 
Arkansas 
Caddo 
Red 
North 
Santiam 
N. Fork, 
Clearwater 
Canadian 
Grand 
(Neosho) 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Missouri

APPENDIX E 
MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 
OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Flood Control 
Total and/or Nay. 
Storage Feature Placed Initial Existing Ultimate 
Commnity in Capability in Useful Power in Installation Installation Project Heig 
Project River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY FY (KW) (KW) Functions Type2 (fee 
Gavins Point Dam Missouri Yankton, SD 504,000 1956 1957 100,000 100,000 NFPRIW E 74 
(Lewis & Clark Lake), 
SD & NE 
Green Peter Lake,OR, 
including Foster Lake, 
OR 
Greers Ferry Lake, AR 
Harry S. Truman Dam 
& Res. 
Hartwell Dam & Lake, 
GA & SC 
Hills Creek Lake, OR 
Ice Harbor L&D (Lake 
Sacajawea), WA 
J. Percy Priest Dam & 
Reservoir, TN 
J. Strom Thurmond 
Dam & Lake GA & 
SC 
Jim Woodruff Dam 
(Lake Seminole), FL, 
GA & AL 
John Day L&D (Lake 
Umatilla), OR & WA 
Sweet Home, 
OR 
Heber Spings 
Warsaw, MO 
Hartwell, GA 
Oakridge, OR 
Pasco, WA 
Nashville, TN 
Savannah Augusta, GA 
Chattahoochee, 
FL 
Rufus, OR 
491,000 
2,844,000 
5,202,000 
2,842,700 
356,000 
417,000 
652,000 
2,900,000 
367,300 
2,500,000 
1967 
1962 
1982 
1961 
1961 
1962 
1967 
1952 
1957 
1968 
1967 
1964 
1983 
1962 
1962 
1961 
1970 
1953 
1957 
;ht Length 
t) (feet) 
8,700 
100,000 100,000 PFNIR C 340 1,380 
96,000 96,000 FPRS C 243 1,704 
160,000 160,000 FPRWS CE 96 5,000 
344,000 344,000 FPRSW CE 204 17,880 
30,000 30,000 NFPRI GE 304 2,150 
603,000 603,000 NPRI CG 130 2,790 
28,000 28,000 FPRW CE 147 2,716 
282,000 282,000 FPRSW CE 200 5,680 
30,000 30,000 NPRW CE 67 6,150 
1969 2,160,000 2,700,000 NPRFI CE 161 5,900 
E-3 
Middle 
Santiam 
Little Red 
Osage 
Savannah 
Middle Fork 
Wilamette 
Snake 
Stones 
Appalachicol 
a
Columbia

APPENDIX E 
MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 
OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Flood Control 
Total and/or Nay. 
Storage Feature Placed Initial Existing Ultimate 
Commnity in Capability in Useful Power in Installation Installation Project Heig 
Project River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY FY (KW) (KW) Functions Type2 (feet 
John H. Kerr Dam & Roanoke Boydton, VA 2,750,300 1952 1953 204,000 204,000 FPRW CE 144
ht Length 
t) (feet) 
22,285 
Reservoir, NC& VA 
Keystone Lake, OK 
Lake Greeson, AR 
Laurel River, KY 
Libby Dam, Lake 
Koocanusa, MT 
Little Goose L&D 
(Lake Bryan), WA 
Lookout Point Lake 
including Dexter Lake, 
OR 
Lost Creek Lake, OR 
Lower Granite L&D, 
WA 
Lower Monumental 
L&D (Lake Herbert G. 
West), WA 
McNary L&D OR & 
WA 
Millers Ferry L&D, 
AL 
Mississippi Delta 
Region, LA 
(Caernarvon 
Freshwater Diversion) 
Arkansas 
Little 
Missouri 
Laurel 
Kootenai 
Snake 
Middle Fork 
Rogue 
Snake 
Snake 
Tulsa, OK 
Murfreesboro,A 
R
London, KY 
Libby, MT 
Starbuck, WA 
Lowell, OR 
Trail, OR 
Pomeroy, WA 
Kahlotus, WA 
Columbia Umatilla, OR 
Alabama Camden, AL 
Mississippi Braithwaite, LA 
1,672,613 
407,900 
435,600 
5,809,000 
565,000 
483,000 
465,000 
484,000 
376,000 
1,550,000 
331,8090 
1964 
1950 
1973 
1972 
1970 
1954 
1977 
1975 
1969 
1953 
1969 
1991 
1968 
1950 
1978 
1975 
1970 
1955 
1977 
1975 
1969 
1954 
1979 
70,000 70,000 FNPWS E 
25,500 25,500 FPRW C 
61,000 61,000 
525,000 840,000 
FPRW R 
FPR C 
121 4,600 
183.5 941 
282 1,420 
420 3,055 
810,000 810,000 NPRI CG 165 2,655 
135,000 135,000 NFPRI CE 243 3,381 
49,000 49,000 DFPISWR CE 
810,000 810,000 NPRIF CG 
345 
146 
3,600 
3,200 
810,000 810,000 NPRI CG 135 3,800 
980,000 980,000 NPRI CG 181 7,365 
75,000 75,000 NPRW CE 90 11,380 
W CE 38.5 371 
E-4

APPENDIX E 
MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 
OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Flood Control 
Total and/or Nay. 
Storage Feature Placed Initial Existing Ultimate 
Commnity in Capability in Useful Power in Installation Installation Project Heig 
Project River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY FY (KW) (KW) Functions Type2 (fee 
Nanpil River Nanpil River Pohnpei, FSM 1987 1988 2,000 2,000 P C 17 
Hydropower, Pohnpei, 
FSM 
New Melones Lake, 
CA4 
Norfork Lake, AR & 
MO 
Oahe Dam (Lake 
Oahe), SD & ND 
Old Hickory L&D, TN 
Ozark-Jeta Taylor 
L&D, AR 
Philpott Lake, VA 
Richard B. Russell 
Dam & Lake, GA & 
SC 
Robert F. Henry L&D, 
AL 
Robert S. Kerr L&D 
and Reservoir, OK 
Sam Rayburn Dam& 
Reservoir, TX 
St. Mary's Riv, MI 
Snettisham, AK5 
Stanislaus 
North Fork 
Missouri 
Cumberland 
Arkansas 
Roanoke 
Savannah 
Alabama 
Arkansas 
Angelina 
Great Lakes 
Speel 
Oakdale, CA 
Norfolk, AR 
Pierre, SD 
Hendersonville, 
TN 
Ozark, AR 
Bassett, VA 
Augusta, GA 
Benton, AL 
Sallisaw, OK 
Jasper, TX 
Sault Ste. Marie 
Juneau, AK 
2,400,000 
1,983,000 
23,337,000 
545,000 
148,400 
318,500 
1,026,244 
234,200 
525,700 
3,997,600 
352,400 
1978 
1943 
1959 
1954 
1969 
1951 
1984 
1972 
1970 
1965 
1855 
1979 
1944 
1962 
1957 
1973 
1954 
1984 
1975 
1971 
1966 
1952 
1973 
300,000 
80,550 
595,000 
100,000 
100,000 
14,000 
345,000 
68,000 
110,000 
52,000 
18,400 
73,700 
300,000 
163,000 
595,000 
100,000 
100,000 
14,000 
665,000 
68,000 
110,000 
52,000 
18,400 
73,700 
FIPRW 
FPRS 
NFPRIW 
NPR 
NPR 
FPR 
PRFSW 
NPRW 
NPR 
FPWR 
NP 
P 
ER 
C
E 
CE 
C
C 
CE 
625 
216 
245 
98 
58 
220 
200 
CE 101 
E 75 
CE 120 
Contro 
I Gate 
C6 18
ht Length 
t) (feet) 
70 
1,560 
2,624 
9,300 
3,605 
2,480 
892 
5,616 
14,962 
7,230 
19,430 
338 
E-5

APPENDIX E 
MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 
OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Project River 
Commnity in 
Vicinity 
Stockton Lake, MO Sac Stockton, MO 
Table Rock Lake, AR White Branson, MO 
& MO 
Tenkiller Lake, OK Illinois Gore, OK 
The Dalles L&D Columbia The Dalles, OR 
(Lake Celilo), WA & 
OR 
Walter F. George Chattahooche Fort Gaines, 
L&D, GA & FL GA 
Webbers Falls L&D, Arkansas Wevbbers Falls, 
OK OK 
West Point Lake, AL Chattahooche West Point, GA 
&GA 
Whitney Lake, TX Brazos Whitney, TX 
Wolf Creek Dam Cumberland Jamestown, KY 
(Lake Cumberland), 
KY 
Total 
Storage 
Capability 
(acre-feet)' 
1,674,000 
3,462,000 
1,230,800 
53,000 
934,000 
170,100 
604,500 
1,999,500 
6,089,000 
Flood Control 
and/or Nay. 
Feature Placed 
in Useful 
Operation CY 
1969 
1958 
1952 
" 1957 
1963 
1970 
1975 
1953 
1950 
Initial 
Power in 
FY 
1973 
1959 
1953 
1957 
1963 
1973 
1975 
1954 
1952 
Existing 
Installation 
(KW) 
45,200 
200,000 
Ultimate 
Installation 
(KW) 
45,200 
200,000 
40,000 40,000 
1,806,800 1,806,800 
Project 
Functions 
FPRWS 
FPR 
FP 
NPR 
Type2 
CEG 
CE 
E 
CR 
Height 
(feet) 
128 
252 
197 
300 
Length 
(feet) 
5,100 
6,423 
3,000 
8,875 
130,000 130,000 NPRW CE 114 13,585 
60,000 60,000 NP E 84 4,370 
73,375 108,375 FPRW CE 97 7,250 
30,000 30,000 
270,000 270,000 
FPR 
FPR 
CE 
CE 
159 
258 
17,695 
5,736 
E-6 
.

APPENDIX E 
MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 
OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS 
D - Debris Control P - Power 
F - Flood Control R - Public Recreation Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000 
I - Irrigation S - Water Supply 
N - Navigation W - Fish & Wildlife (Federal Or State) 
1 Total of all storage functions, including inactive and dead storage to normal full pool 
2 G: gravel; R: rock; C: concrete; E: earth 
3 Units 4 and 5 were declared commercially operable by Southwestern Power Administration (SWPA) on May 1, 1982. No other units 
have been declared commercially operable by SWPA. All six units have successfully generated power, but one or two units at a time will 
be out of service for repairs and modifications until late 1995. 
4 Being operated for the Department of Interior by the Bureau of Reclamation 
5 Being operated by the Alaska Power Administration 
6 Formerly Clarks Hill Lake 
' Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized in 1990. 
E-7

APPENDIX F 
MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 
UNDER CONSTRUCTION, SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
Nameplate Capacity 
Project Fiscal Scheduled Scheduled Scheduled Ultimate Installation 
Year For For Functions Installation 
Started Operation Completion 
Bonneville Second Powerhouse, OR and WA 
Chief Joseph Additional Units, WA 
Clarence Cannon Dam, Salt River, MO 
Cooper River, Charleston Hbr, SC 3 
Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage 
River, MO 
Mississippi Delta Region, LA (Davis Pond 
Freshwater Diversion) 
New Melones Lake, CA 2 
Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Savannah 
River, GA and SC 
Snettisham, AK 
1974 
1973 
1966 
1977 
1966 
1967 
1981 
1994 
1985 
1985 
1965 
1987 5 
1979 
Indefinite 
1975 
1989 
1997 
1996 
1997 
2001 
1982 1 
1999 
PR 
PIR 
FNPRSW 
NWDP 
1995 
558,200 
2,2373,160 
58,000 
84,000 
FRPWS 
558,200 
2,525,000 4 
58,000 
84,000 
160,000 
2003 W 
DFIPRW 300,000 300,000 
1985 
1993 
1997 FRPW 
P 73,700 
600,000 
27,000 
F-1

APPENDIX F 
MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 
UNDER CONSTRUCTION, SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 
KEY 
D - Redevelopment F - Flood Control I - Irrigation N - Na 
P - Power R - Recreation S - Water Supply W - Fis 
Units 4 and 5 were declared commercially operable by Southwestern Power Administration (SWPA) on May 1, 1982. No other 
units have been declared commercially operable by SWPA. All six units have successfully generated power. Repairs and 
modifications have been required; Units 3, 5, and 6 are fully repaired and operational. Repairs to remaining units will be completed in 
1998. 
2 New Melones Lake was turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation for operation on November 20, 1979. Corps retains responsibility 
for facilities along the lower Stanisalaus River. Remaining construction consists of unscheduled recreation facilities and minor feature 
closeouts. 
3 Remaining construction consists of a two-lane bridge and highway facility which the SC HWY Dept has an option to initiate 
construction on until May 2001. 
" Limited by hydraulic factors. Units 1-27. 
S Receipt of funds to initiate construction. 
vigatio 
h&W 
F-2

TABLE - 1 
FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 
BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) During Fiscal Year 1995 
Damages Damages Prevented Total Flood Average * Comparision of 
Location Prevented by by Corps Supported Damages Prevented Damages 1995 to the 
Corps Controlled Emergency by the Corps Prevented Ten-Year Avg 
Projects Operations of Engineers FY 1986-95 1986-95 
ALABAMA 0 0 0 0 LOW 
ALASKA 8,750 0 8,750 6,743 MEDIUM 
ARIZONA 140,456 0 140,456 17,295 VERY HIGH 
ARKANSAS 1,350,558 0 1,350,558 504,089 HIGH 
CALIFORNIA 1,484,202 0 1,484,202 1,665,705 MEDIUM 
COLORADO 3,071 0 3,071 1,806 MEDIUM 
CONNECTICUT 305 0 305 37,563 LOW 
DELAWARE 0 O 0 0 LOW 
FLORIDA 102,572 1,500 104,072 15,726 VERYHIGH 
GEORGIA 3,889 0 3,889 6,006 MEDIUM 
GUAM 0 0 0 3 LOW 
I HAWAII 5,126 0 5,126 2,763 MEDIUM 
IDAHO 54,948 0 54,948 21,527 HIGH 
ILLINOIS 2,664,865 0 2,664,865 612,791 HIGH 
INDIANA 24,661 0 24,661 62,414 LOW 
IOWA 75,133 0 75,133 144,522 MEDIUM 
KANSAS 849,044 0 849,044 757,105 MEDIUM 
KENTUCKY 79,609 O 79,609 65,1 35 MEDIUM 
LOUISIANA 9,683,360 0 9,683,360 6,393,854 MEDIUM 
MAINE 70 0 70 768 LOW 
MARYLAND & D.C. 2 0 2 28,079 LOW 
MASSACHUSETTS 135 0 135 28,193 LOW 
MICHIGAN 867 0 867 5,858 LOW 
MINNESOTA 8,978 0 8,978 21,342 LOW 
MISSISSIPPI 1,059,468 0 1,059,468 460,064 HIGH 
MISSOURI 5,740,337 500 5,740,837 1,893,479 HIGH 
* LEDGEND: LOW = <1/2 average. MED= 1/2 to 2 times average. 
HIGH = 2 to 5 times average. VERY HIGH = > 5 times average.

TABLE - 1 
FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 
BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) During Fiscal Year 1995 
Damages Damages Prevented Total Flood Average * Comparision of 
Location Prevented by by Corps Supported Damages Prevented Damages 1995 to the 
Corps Controlled Emergency by the Corps Prevented Ten-Year Avg 
Projects Operations of Engineers FY 1986-95 1986-95 
MONTANA 12,454 550 13004 8,674 MEDIUM 
NEBRASKA 80,795 0 80,795 68,374 MEDIUM 
NEVADA 63,611 0 63,611 7,761 VERY HIGH 
NEW HAMPSHIRE 0 0 0 1,855 LOW 
NEW JERSEY 13,017 0 13,017 3,777 HIGH 
NEW MEXICO 29,195 0 29,195 " 67,378 LOW 
NEW YORK 31,201 0 31,201 44,236 MEDIUM 
N. CAROLINA 26,823 0 26,823 27,104 MEDIUM 
N. DAKOTA 32,848 O 32,848 29,1 63 MEDIUM 
OHIO 47,928 6 47,934 117,892 LOW 
OKLAHOMA 196,801 0 196,801 218,622 MEDIUM 
0 OREGON 1,342 0 1,342 352,434 LOW I9 PENNSYLVANIA 3,954 0 3,954 57,742 LOW 
PUERTO RICO & V.I. 12,242 0 12,242 4,631 HIGH 
RHODE ISLAND 0 0 0 1,668 LOW 
S. CAROLINA 943 0 943 935 MEDIUM 
S. DAKOTA 7,192 800 7,992 1,805 HIGH 
TENNESSEE 36,000 3,500 39,500 42,532 MEDIUM 
TEXAS 2,672,764 0 2,672,764 2,129,011 MEDIUM 
UTAH 0 0 0 4,438 LOW 
VERMONT 3,304 0 3,304 2,561 MEDIUM 
VIRGINIA 5,736 0 5,736 39,334 LOW 
WASHINGTON 6,228 0 6,228 107,958 LOW 
W. VIRGINIA 129,065 0 129,065 87,813 MEDIUM 
WISCONSIN 31 0 31 1,41 6 LOW 
WYOMING 18,048 1,500 19,548 6,191 HIGH 
TOTALS 26,771,928 8,356 26,780,284 16,209,370 
FY 1995 Damages Prevented in the U.S. = 165% of the 10-year (1986-95) Average

TABLE - 2 
TOTAL DAMAGES SUFFERED IN FY 1995, 
BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) 
Damages Damages Potential Percent Average Lives Lives 
LOCATION Suffered Prevented Damages Damages Damages Lost Lost FY 
FY 1995 FY 1995 FY 1995 Prevented Suffered FY 1995 1986-95 
FY 1995 1985-96 
ALABAMA 0 0 0 0 25,073 0 24 
ALASKA 10,025 8,750 18,775 47 11,783 0 1 
ARIZONA 6,618 56,000 62,618 89 28,252 1 12 
ARKANSAS 0 1,350,558 1,350,558 100 19,289 0 12 
CALIFORNIA 1,495,960 1,356,269 2,862,229 48 225,488 8 48 
COLORADO 18,240 3,071 76,861 4 2,478 0 0 
CONNECTICUT 0 305,000 305,000 100 1,751 0 1 
DELAWARE 0 0 0 0 234 0 3 
FLORIDA 18,536 104,072 122,608 85 30,604 0 4 
GEORGIA 8,845 3,889 12,734 31 45,965 0 52 
S GUAM 0 00 0 0 0 0 
w HAWAII 0 5,126 5,126 100 8,134 0 11 
IDAHO 2,096 330,948 333,044 99 721 0 0 
ILLINOIS 27,240 2,664,865 2,692,105 99 304,746 1 14 
INDIANA 6,789 24,661 31,450 78 26,488 3 13 
IOWA 3,498 75,133 78,631 96 641,987 0 12 
KANSAS 8,874 849,044 857,918 99 93,620 0 9 
KENTUCKY 17,673 79,609 97,282 82 11,455 2 20 
LOUISIANA 3,097,250 9,683,360 12,780,610 76 529,101 6 18 
MAINE 0 70,000 70,000 100 10,033 0 5 
MARYLAND & D.C. 1,620 2 1,622 0 821 0 7 
MASSACHUSETTS 0 135 135 100 7,908 0 8 
MICHIGAN 2,900 867 3,767 23 42,325 0 10 
MINNESOTA 3,750 8,978 12,728 71 102,320 0 9 
MISSISSlPPI 1,092 1,059,468 1,060,560 100 39,318 0 7 
MISSOURI 25,415 5,740,837 5,766,252 100 377,044 3 58 
MONTANA 510 13,004 13,514 96 6,539 0 7 
Damage values of less than $50 thousand dollars are shown as zeros.

TABLE- 2 
TOTAL DAMAGES SUFFERED IN FY 1995, 
BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) 
Damages Damages Potential Percent Average Lives Lives 
LOCATION Suffered Prevented Damages Damages Damages Lost Lost FY 
FY 1995 FY 1995 FY 1995 Prevented Suffered FY 1995 1986-95 
FY 1995 1985-96 
NEBRASKA 5,129 80,795 85,924 94 48,338 0 8 
NEVADA 11,970 0 11,970 0 3,450 1 5 
NEW HAMPSHIRE 110 0 110 0 2,637 0 0 
NEW JERSEY 0 13,017 13,017 100 3,872 0 4 
NEW MEXICO 954 29,195 30,149 97 4,157 0 10 
NEW YORK 1,485 31,201 32,686 95 25,526 0 28 
N. CAROLINA 26,596 26,823 53,419 50 9,025 9 24 
N. DAKOTA 44,366 32,848 77,214 43 53,781 0 1 
OHIO 28,511 47,934 76,445 63 29,307 5 45 
OKLAHOMA 3,275 196,801 200,076 98 92,983 4 19 
OREGON 11,320 1,342 12,662 11 5,822 0 3 
PENNSYLVANIA 10,385 3,954 14,339 28 11,669 4 18 
PUERTO RICO & V.I. 115 12,242 12,357 99 17,600 1 103 
RHODE ISLAND 0 0 0 0 79 0 0 
S. CAROLINA 28,169 943 29,112 3 10,008 3 17 
S. DAKOTA 12,270 7,992 20,262 39 81,213 0 5 
TENNESSEE 1,264 39,500 40,764 97 12,064 0 25 
TEXAS 85,050 2,672,764 2,757,314 97 184,271 48 170 
UTAH 1,500 0 1,500 0 50,240 0 1 
VERMONT 5,150 3,304 8,454 39 4,043 1 4 
VIRGINIA 66,759 5,736 72,495 8 93,563 2 42 
WASHINGTON 250 6,228 6,478 96 33,990 0 8 
W. VIRGINIA 8,595 129,065 137,660 94 63,138 0 47 
WISCONSIN 675 31 706 4 111,022 0 5 
WYOMING 0 19,548 19,548 100 407 1 2 
TOTALS 5,110,829 27,154,909 32,320,788 3,545,680 103 959 
AVERAGE 84 96 
Damage values of less than $50 thousand dollars are shown as zeros.

TABLE - 3 
FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 
FISCAL YEARS 1986-1995 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) 
LOCATION FY 86 FY 87 FY88 FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 10 
ALABAMA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
ALASKA 6,828 17,000 0 8,000 0 8,100 10,000 0 8,750 8,750 
ARIZONA 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,945 113,000 0 140,456 
ARKANSAS 466,429 397,794 240,694 401,796 635,569 478,008 65,947 143,070 861,023 1,350,558 5 
CALIFORNIA 13,910,920 154,858 98 4,770 9,500 64,022 406,036 750,435 138 1,484,202 1,6 
COLORADO 502 1,442 1,755 0 0 482 9,367 928 509 3,071 
CONNECTICUT 25 224,314 0 1,892 53,180 100 4,228 65,839 25,746 305 
DELAWARE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
FLORIDA 0 2,619 6,461 456 256 1,305 17,591 19,155 5,342 104,072 
GEORGIA 0 4,220 0 850 37,618 1,689 1,474 6,549 3,771 3,889 
GUAM 28 0 
HAWAII 220 220 8,540 82 1,085 5,457 194 10 6,700 5,126 
IDAHO 20,757 623 113 14,900 5,073 23,018 253 85,743 9,844 54,948 
ILLONOIS 68,235 262,386 2,105 7,925 450,687 64,996 10,369 2,501,431 94,914 2,664,865 6 
INDIANA 46,287 14,257 9,032 61,145 57,583 149,239 27,288 106,604 128,040 24,661 
IOWA 106,878 376,965 476 76 128,746 77,099 14,662 624,071 41,110 75,133 1 
KANSAS 114,694 284,377 16,712 105,716 78,201 30,816 298,933 5,760,259 32,293 849,044 7 
KENTUCKY 16,110 20,768 7,718 96,757 25,868 159,089 35,464 31,614 178,350 79,609 
LOUISIANA 8,478,185 113,053 1,001,845 5,007,949 9,623,200 13,670,272 1,005,357 7,452,058 7,903,263 9,683,360 6,3 
MAINE 0 7,605 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 
MARYLAND&DC 109,102 7,000 364 3 9 14 93,074 71,225 0 2 
MASSACHUSETTS 437 203,457 230 237 6,975 9,472 574 34,133 26,276 135 
MICHIGAN 10,411 31,352 8,477 3,654 3,405 0 412 0 0 867 
MINNISOTA 22,083 5,888 411 21,995 1,485 5,400 2,929 133,273 10,980 8,978 
MISSISSIPPI 360,552 226,975 198,604 549,885 626,709 1,196,409 155,364 105,666 121,003 1,059,468 4 
MISSOURI 717,926 1,006,876 42,370 117,726 245,361 200,669 299,878 9,793,809 769,333 5,740,837 1,8 
MONTANA 19,531 277 0 27 7,394 15,408 4,483 20,070 6,542 13,004 
) Yr. Avg
0 
6,743 
25,740 
04,089 
78,498 
1,806 
37,563
0 
15,726 
6,006
3 
2,763 
21,527 
12,791 
62,414 
44,522 
57,105 
65,135 
93,854 
768 
28,079 
28,193 
5,858 
21,342 
60,064 
93,479 
8,674 
Ui
I 
<(

TABLE - 3 
FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 
FISCAL YEARS 1986-1995 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) 
LOCATION FY 86 FY 87 FY88 FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 10 
NEBRASKA 72,187 172,657 457 17,427 11,007 58,559 7,351 226,588 36,715 80,795 
NEVADA 14,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63,611 
NEW HAMPSHIRE 350 14,397 0 0 0 0 0 3,549 250 0 
NEW JERSEY 121 94 4,907 3,336 4,991 1,247 445 1,258 8,355 13,017 
NEWMEXICO 87,139 97,900 21,528 2,755 42,531 91,189 27,619 109,486 164,439 29,195 
NEWYORK 80,610 34,739 5,656 39,507 12,879 17,566 6,120 157,744 56,334 31,201 
N. CAROLINA 4,034 94,430 65 18,362 17,063 23,231 8,474 24,023 54,536 26,823 
N. DAKOTA 4,324 53,497 O 47,131 6,429 1,591 942 109,062 35,802 32,848 
OHIO 97,966 80,260 45,183 89,977 140,824 250,242 6,601 107,340 312,590 47,934 1 
OKLAHOMA 61,857 758,329 109,979 123,272 220,136 19,116 52,838 556,345 87,545 196,801 2 
OREGON 1,394,551 38,568 294,945 840,765 693,409 42,633 47,243 87,844 83,039 1,342 3 
PENNSYLVANIA 224,267 9,971 15,290 27,845 16,424 40,498 3,046 189,825 46,304 3,954 
PUERTO RICO & VI 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 4,665 4,400 0 12,242 
RHODE ISLAND 0 9,975 0 0 2,940 1,620 0 2,145 0 0 
S. CAROLINA 157 694 17 1,434 59 2,849 625 300 2,268 943 
S.DAKOTA 811 536 457 457 460 572 4,140 1,978 651 7,992 
TENNESSEE 10,749 5,253 4,864 9,651 7,588 310,926 496 768 35,528 39,500 
TEXAS 208,333 192,464 6,245 537,403 4,122,558 13,860 5,197,449 2,631,802 5,707,236 2,672,764 2,1 
UTAH 2,300 0 0 500 500 1,500 700 34,326 4,553 0 
VERMONT 1,362 6,295 782 2,298 1,874 2,525 2,275 1,892 3,006 3,304 
VIRGINIA 87,703 124,709 5,375 11,243 10,035 1,686 124,553 18,683 3,621 5,736 
WASHINGTON 98,808 86,774 1,039 62,403 258,333 357,877 54,343 87,844 65,935 6,228 1 
W. VIRGINA 354,265 49,269 458 18,592 7,406 76,882 40,152 98,580 103,464 129,065 
WISCONSON 127 24 0 0 0 0 0 13,914 65 31 
WYOMING 10,637 91 62 779 2,603 4,424 1,373 22,095 298 19,548 
TOTALS 27,317,770 5,195,252 2,063,314 8,260,978 17,577,953 17,481,657 8,059,272 32,310,733 17,046,489 26,780,284 16,2 
SYr. Avg 
68,374 
7,761 
1,855 
3,777 
67,378 
44,236 
27,104 
29,163 
17,892 
18,622 
52,434 
57,742 
4,631 
1,668 
935 
1,805 
42,532 
29,011 
4,438 
2,561 
39,334 
07,958 
87,813 
1,416 
6,191 
39,370 
c0, 
0o1

TABLE - 4 
TOTAL FLOOD DAMAGES SUFFERED, BY STATE 
FISCAL YEARS 1986-1995 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) 
LOCATION FY 86 FY 87 FY88 FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY94 FY95 lOYr. Av 
ALABAMA 0 755 1,721 178 120,000 15,055 320 0 112,696 0 25,07 
ALASKA 0 20,000 500 6,000 0 0 7,302 0 74,000 10,025 11,78 
ARIZONA 3,000 7 71 33,636 3,220 258 5,189 228,900 1,616 6,618 28,25 
ARKANSAS 2,240 15,045 12,612 2,320 143,056 12,006 909 2,680 2,024 0 19,28 
CALIFORNIA 402,000 1,015 52,353 38,738 570 3,376 93,152 165,920 1,792 1,495,960 225,48 
COLORADO 166 0 0 481 130 2,820 1,602 100 1,242 18,240 2,47 
CONNECTICUT 0 5,000 0 800 10 16 10,366 0 1,316 0 1,75 
DELAWARE 0 0 0 1,600 0 0 2 0 741 0 23 
FLORIDA 7,275 645 50,350 2,109 500 0 41,938 2,080 182,605 18,536 30,60 
GEORGIA 2,000 1,470 230 1,792 30,658 106,158 1,156 7,340 300,000 8,845 45,96 
GUAM 0 
HAWAII 0 2,050 35,647 3,392 665 23,715 9,260 2,910 3,700 0 8,13 
IDAHO 2,005 17 0 178 113 2,574 224 0 0 2,096 72 
ILLONOIS 104,705 150,000 102 1,600 71,045 19,834 189 2,640,140 32,606 27,240 304,74 
INDIANA 2,500 1,906 89 716 105,550 89,504 45,424 9,550 2,852 6,789 26,48 
IOWA 45,307 16,755 0 7,286 351,401 195,703 50,800 5,740,000 9,124 3,498 641,98 
KANSAS 181,700 152,000 0 3,394 2,048 16,551 10,127 551,070 10,437 8,874 93,62 
KENTUCKY 25 68 250 27,445 5,664 9,034 46,870 4,980 2,544 17,673 11,45 
LOUISIANA 1,515,250 1,175 8,708 322,118 115,901 221,720 4,191 4,020 675 3,097,250 529,101 
MAINE 5,000 61,250 0 3,200 0 16,336 2,179 3,040 9,323 0 10,03 
MARYLAND & DC 0 51 0 1,600 23 48 339 0 4,524 1,620 821 
MASSACHUSETTS 21,500 47,480 0 0 50 9,716 176 160 0 0 7,908 
MICHIGAN 405,000 15 206 180 627 6,133 355 1,600 6,236 2,900 42,325 
MINNISOTA 1,501 27,800 555 17,600 3,032 1,280 1,760 964,050 1,867 3,750 102,32C 
MISSISSIPPI 651 6,380 39,420 3,635 21,805 313,359 1,010 4,480 1,352 1,092 39,318 
MISSOURI 155,000 100,550 69 16,067 1,842 1,960 2,044 3,429,630 37,864 25,415 377,044 
MONTANA 38,674 0 0 2,194 1,758 10,743 1,403 6,720 3,392 510 6,539 
Damage values of less than $50 thousand dollars are shown as zeroes. 
g
3
3
2
9
88 
1
44 
5
0
4
1
6
8
73 
5
13 
3
J3 
3 
I"

TABLE - 4 
TOTAL FLOOD DAMAGES SUFFERED, BY STATE 
FISCAL YEARS 1986-1995 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) 
LOCATION FY 86 FY 87 FY88 FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY94 FY95 lOYr.Avg 
NEBRASKA 28,482 25,890 61 29,772 36,536 53,615 6,683 294,500 2,710 5,129 48,338 
NEVADA 20,650 13 12 23 51 2 1,621 0 160 11,970 3,450 
NEW HAMPSHIRE 5,962 19,100 0 0 1,200 0 0 0 0 110 2,637 
NEW JERSEY 0 17,050 50 1,600 1 16,002 500 0 3,520 0 3,872 
NEW MEXICO 0 10 0 3,378 1,187 1,567 32,264 210 2,000 954 4,157 
NEW YORK 30,820 75,275 230 38,271 6,530 19,603 1,862 55,480 25,707 1,485 25,526 
N. CAROLINA 1,990 20,461 0 21,072 1,075 2,694 12,927 1,400 2,032 26,596 9,025 
N. DAKOTA 315 4,943 0 16,000 0 32 0 413,600 58,552 44,366 53,781 
OHIO 10,000 20,518 2 52,240 40,846 55,165 20,078 25,800 39,913 28,511 29,307 
OKLAHOMA 802,250 22,250 3,437 2,121 40,650 90 10,871 44,720 166 3,275 92,983 
OREGON 33,900 900 125 98 1,070 9,010 32 1,760 0 11,320 5,822 
PENNSYLVANIA 71,540 28 62 7,106 792 8,342 1,805 440 16,194 10,385 11,669 
PUERTO RICO & VI 67,369 1,850 11,001 0 65 16 90,127 5,300 160 115 17,600 
RHODE ISLAND 0 550 0 0 50 174 16 0 0 0 79 
S. CAROLINA 3,070 31,771 0 370 677 11,871 0 17,920 6,228 28,169 10,008 
S. DAKOTA 6,665 3 0 16 3,000 2,934 3,460 763,380 20,399 12,270 81,213 
TENNESSEE 15,150 95 5,165 11,482 18,059 13,109 204 5,070 51,039 1,264 12,064 
TEXAS 34,100 546,515 2,226 341,098 386,886 188,766 199,356 56,990 1,721 85,050 184,271 
UTAH 479,000 250 0 15,403 56 6,005 24 160 0 1,500 50,240 
VERMONT 0 10,500 0 50 15,657 19 2 7,550 1,502 5,150 4,043 
VIRGINIA 800,000 1,510 0 39,363 3,472 984 7,371 0 16,169 66,759 93,563 
WASHINGTON 20,351 30,150 11 320 58,770 227,634 176 2,080 160 250 33,990 
W.VIRGINA 600,000 125 1 1,010 8,930 908 5,791 620 5,397 8,595 63,138 
WISCONSON 80,000 2,992 32 160 31,159 180 29,305 903,660 62,052 675 111,022 
WYOMING 250 16 0 1,602 44 2,160 0 0 0 0 407 
TOTALS 6,007,363 1,444,199 225,298 1,080,814 1,636,431 1,698,781 762,762 16,370,010 1,120,309 5,110,829 3,545,680 
Damage values of less than $50 thousand dollars are shown as zeroes. 
c030o

TABLE - 5 
TOTAL LIVES LOST, BY STATE 
FISCAL YEARS 1986-1995 
LOCATION FY 86 FY 87 FY88 FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 10-Yr Total 
ALABAMA 0 2 1 0 16 1 2 0 2 0 24 
ALASKA 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 
ARIZONA 0 0 0 0 4 1 3 3 0 1 12 
ARKANSAS 0 3 1 4 1 1 0 2 0 0 12 
CALIFORNIA 14 0 0 0 3 2 2 17 2 8 48 
COLORADO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
CONNECTICUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 
DELAWARE 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 
FLORIDA 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 
GEORGIA 0 4 0 0 11 4 1 3 29 0 52 
GUAM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
HAWAII 0 2 0 1 0 1 6 0 1 0 11 
IDAHO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
ILLONOIS 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 1 2 1 14 
INDIANA 0 1 2 0 1 3 1 1 1 3 13 
IOWA 1 0 0 0 3 3 0 5 0 0 12 
KANSAS 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 3 1 0 9 
KENTUCKY 0 2 0 4 0 2 8 2 0 2 20 
LOUISIANA 1 1 4 2 1 2 1 0 0 6 18 
MAINE 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 5 
MARYLAND & DC 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 
MASSACHUSETTS 2 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 
MICHIGAN 6 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 10 
MINNISOTA 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 9 
MISSISSIPPI 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 1 0 7 
MISSOURI 7 1 1 1 5 0 0 29 11 3 58 
MONTANA 2 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 7 
0
'.0

TABLE - 5 
TOTAL LIVES LOST, BY STATE 
FISCAL YEARS 1986-1995 
LOCATION FY 86 FY 87 FY88 FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 10-Yr Total 
NEBRASKA 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 5 0 0 8 
NEVADA 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 5 
NEW HAMPSHIRE O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
NEW JERSEY 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 
NEW MEXICO 2 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 10 
NEW YORK 4 12 0 0 0 2 0 7 3 0 28 
N. CAROLINA 1 0 0 4 4 3 2 1 0 9 24 
N.DAKOTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 
OHIO 1 0 0 4 32 0 2 0 1 5 45 
OKLAHOMA 2 4 0 1 1 0 2 5 O 4 19 
OREGON 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 
PENNSYLVANIA 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 4 18 
PUERTO RICO & VI 55 3 12 0 3 1 25 3 0 1 103 
RHODE ISLAND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
S. CAROLINA 3 0 0 0 4 5 0 2 0 3 17 
S.DAKOTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 
TENNESSEE 1 4 3 9 3 0 2 0 3 0 25 
TEXAS 25 29 9 18 13 3 19 6 0 48 170 
UTAH 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 
VERMONT 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 4 
VIRGINIA 22 6 0 6 0 2 1 1 2 2 42 
WASHINGTON 0 1 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 8 
W. VIRGINA 38 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 5 0 47 
wiSCONSON 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 5 
WYOMING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 
TOTALS 208 88 37 74 125 58 87 109 70 103 959 
0
0

INDEX 
A 
Abbapoola Creek, SC (SAN) 7-22 
Aberdeen and Vicinity, SD (MRO) 26-28 
Aberdeen Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Aberdeen, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Abescon Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-27 
Abilene, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 
Abiquiu Dam, NM (SWA) 32-4, 32-12, 32-15 
Absecon Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 
Accotink Creek, VA (NAB) 4-35 
Acequias Irrigation System, NM (SWA) 32-1, 32-11, 
32-14 
Active Investigations (SAN) 7-10, 
Ada County Unit (NPW) 39-16 
Adams Creek, SC (SAN) 7-20 
Adams, Hossic River Basin, MA (NAN) 2-30 
Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, TX (SWG) 31-11 
Addison, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-29 
Adena, OH (Short Creek) (ORP) 18-24 
Adkin Branch, NC (SAW) 6-31, 6-34 
Advance Engineering and Design 
Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-11 
Baltimore District (NAB) 4-24 
Buffalo District (NCB) 20-18 
Detroit District (NCE) 21-49 
Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-13 
Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-26 
Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-12 
Louisville District (ORL) 16-13 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-28 
Nashville District (ORN) 15-8 
New England Division (NED) 1-31 
Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-4 
Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 
Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 
Portland District (NPP) 37-24 
Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 
Sacramento District (SPK) 35-26 
San Francisco District (SPN) 34-7 
Seattle District (NPS) 38-13 
St. Paul 24-20 
Tulsa District (SWT) 29-13 
Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-12 
Wilmington District (SAW) 6-18 
Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa (POD) 
36-8 
Agana River, Guam (POD) 36-9 
Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-7 
Agat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-7 
Agat Shoreline, Guam (POD) 36-11 
AIWW - Mooring Basins (SAW) 6-31 
AIWW - New River Onslow County, NC (SAW) 6-31 
AIWW - Peltier Creek, 12-foot project (SAW) 6-31 
AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut (SAW) 6-31 
Ala Wai Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 
Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA (SAM) 10-3, 10-30 
Alabama River at Montgomery, AL (SAM) 10-50 
Alameda Creek (SPN) 34-14 
Alameda Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Alamo Dam, AZ (SPL) 33-6, 33-17 
Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ (SPL) 33-28 
Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (closed) 
Basin, NM (SWA) 32-18 
Alamogordo, NM (SWA) 32-2, 32-11 
Alamosa, CO (SWA) 32-2, 32-11, 32-14 
Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal, VA (NAO) 5-15 
Albemarle Sound, NC (SAW) 6-32 
Albeni Falls Dam, ID (NPS) 38-11, 38-18, 38-24 
Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM (SWA) 32-2, 
32-11 
Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-2, 36-5, 36-6 
Alford, Green River, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-64 
Algoma Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-2, 21-51, 21-75 
Alhambra Creek, CA (SPK) 35-41 
Aliso Creek Dam (SPL) 33-40 
Allatoona Dam - Coosa River Basin, GA (SAM) 10-24, 
10-35 
Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-24 
Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) (ORP) 
18-24 
Allegheny River, open channel work (ORP) 18-21 
Allegheny River, PA (ORP) 18-2, 18-13, 18-17 
Allendale Dam, North Providence, RI (NED) 1-16, 
1-37, 1-50 
Allentown, Lehigh River, PA (NAP) 3-29 
Allenville, AZ (SPL) 33-37 
Alley Bay, Beals, ME (NED) 1-55 
Allison Lake (Valdez Hydropower), AK (NPA) 40-16 
Alloway Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27, 3-28 
Alma Harbor, WI 25-7 
I-1

Almond Lake, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-29 
Almond Village, NY (NAB) 4-39 
Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA 
(LMK) 12-20, 12-21 
Aloha Rigolette, LA (LMK) 12-3, 12-9, 12-11 
Alpena Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-3, 21-54, 21-79 
Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL (NCR) 
23-14 
Alpine, TX (SWA) 32-18 
Alsea River, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers (SAS) 8-2, 
8-13, 8-16 
Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge (LMN) 11-13 
Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir (NED) 1-58 
Alton, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO 
(LSM) 14-3, 14-8, 14-11 
Alum Creek Lake, OH (ORH) 17-2, 17-12, 17-17 
Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA (NAB) 4-22, 4-31 
Amazon Creek, OR (NPP) 37-40, 37-43 
American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA (NPS) 
38-27 
American River, CA (SPK) 35-35, 35-39 
Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA (NCR) 
23-13 
Amesbury, Powwow River, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-65 
Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Amite River and Tributaries, LA (LMN) 11-15 
Amsterdam, OH (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 
Amuchee Creek, GA (SAM) 10-50 
Anacortes Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-21, 
38-26 
Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Anacostia River and Flats (NAB) 4-35 
Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and 
Navigation, Improvements, DC & MD (NAB) 
4-13, 4-28, 4-37 
Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co. 
MD (NAB) 4-37 
Anaheim Bay Harbor Orange County, CA (SPL) 33-36 
Anahuac Channel, TX (SWG) 31-9 
Anchorage Harbor (Uncompleted Portion), AK (NPA) 
40-16 
Anchorage Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-1, 40-10, 40-15 
Anchorages, VA (NAO) 5-14 
Anclote River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Andalusia Harbor, IL 25-7 
Anderson, IN (White River) (ORL) 16-25 
Anderson Park, Newport News, VA (NAO) 5-17 
Andover Lake, CT (NED) 1-58 
Andrews River, MA (NED) 1-3, 1-32, 1-44 
Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO (LSM) 14-17 
Annapolis Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-35 
Annette Island, AK (NPA) 40-18 
Ansonia-Derby, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-64 
Antelope Creek, CA (SPK) 35-44 
Antelope Creek, Lincoln, NE (MRO) 26-28 
Anthony Shoals, GA (SAS) 8-23 
Apalachee Bay, FL to New Orleans, LA (SAM) 10-40, 
10-42 
Apalachicola Bay, FL (SAM) 10-4, 10-37, 10-52 
Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL 
& GA (SAM) 10-4, 10-30, 10-53 
Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NPP) 37-12, 
37-28, 37-36, 37-44 
Appomattox River, VA (NAO) 5-2, 5-12, 5-16, 5-21 
Apponaug Cove, RI (NED) 1-50 
Appoquinimink River, DE (NAP) 3-27 
Aquatic Plant Control 
Charleston District (SAN) 7-1, 7-11, 7-15 
Galveston District (SWG) 31-2, 31-20, 31-25, 31- 
40 
Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-2, 9-28, 9-37 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-6, 10-30, 10-37 
New England Division (NED) 1-3, 1-32, 1-44 
New Orleans District (LMN) 11-13 
New York District (NAN) 2-3, 2-16, 2-19 
Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-28 
Sacramento District (SPK) 35-39 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-2, 8-13, 8-16 
Wilmington District (SAW) 6-2, 6-19, 6-27 
Aquashicola Reservoir, PA (NAP) 3-30 
Aquia Creek, VA (NAB) 4-35 
Aquilla Lake, TX (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 
Ararat River, Mount Airy, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Arcadia Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-3, 21-51, 21-75 
Arcadia Lake, OK (SWT) 29-2, 29-14, 29-23 
Arch Creek, Dade County, FL (SAJ) 9-52 
Archers Creek, SC (SAN) 7-20 
Archusa Creek, MS (SAM) 10-57 
Ardsley, NY (NAN) 2-30 
Area East of Albany, OR (NPP) 37-41 
I-2

Area V, Estelline Springs, TX (SWT) 29-3, 29-14 
Area VIII, TX (SWT) 29-3, 29-14 
Arecibo Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-2, 9-28, 9-37 
Arkansas City (SWT) 29-30 
Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, 
KS, OK and TX (SWT) 29-3, 29-14, 29-23 
Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK and KS (SWL) 28-2, 
28-14, 28-19 
Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK and KS: Navigation 
28-24, 28-25, 28-26, 28-27 
Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS; Lakes (SWL) 
28-28 
Arkansas River, Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, AR 
(SWL) 28-21 
Arkansas River, Sand Springs, OK (SWT) 29-28 
Arkport Dam, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-29 
Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Arlington, Grand Prairie, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Arlington Lake, MO (MRK) 27-18 
Arroyo Colorado, TX (SWG) 31-15, 31-40 
Arthur Kill Channel (NAN) 2-28 
Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No. 9), AR (SWL) 
28-2, 28-6 
Asan Village, Guam (POD) 36-9 
Ash, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Asharoken Village, Northport, NY (NAN) 2-36 
Ashland Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-3, 21-51, 21-75 
Ashland, KY (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
Ashley River, SC (SAN) 7-20 
Ashtabula Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-2, 20-19, 20-29 
Asotin Creek, Asotin, ID (NPW) 39-15 
Asotin Dam, Snake River, ID & WA (NPW) 39-16 
Asquiroga Bay, Guam (POD) 36-8 
Astoria Turning Basin, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, LA 
(LMN) 11-13 
Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA 
(LMN) 11-13 
Atchinson, KS (MRK) 27-17 
Athalia, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Athens, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
Atkinson Creek, Green County, MS (SAM) 10-52 
Atlantic Beach Channels, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Atlantic City, NJ (NAP) 3-30 
Atlantic Coast of Maryland (NAB) 4-12, 4-27, 4-36 
Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Atlantic Intracoastal Bridge at Great Bridge, VA 
(NAO) 5-2 
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA 
and St. Johns River, FL (NAO) 5-2, 5-9, 5-12, 
5-14 (SAW) 6-2, 6-19, 6-24 (SAN) 7-2, 7-11, 
7-15 (SAS) 8-3, 8-13, 8-16 (SAJ) 9-2, 9-28, 9-37 
Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Auasi Harbor American Samoa (POD) 36-7 
Auburn, NY, Owasco Outlet (NCB) 20-44 
Auburn Water Pump Facility, Auburn, NY (NCB) 
20-44, 20-46 
Auglaize River, Paulding County, OH (NCB) 20-46 
Augusta, KY (ORH) 17-21 
Augusta LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26 
Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA (NED) 1-3, 1-32, 
1-44 
Aunuu Harbor American Samoa (POD) 36-7 
Aurora, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam, CO (MRO) 
26-26 
AuSable Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-4, 21-54, 21-79 
Authorized Alteration of Bridges (ORN) 15-4 
Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects (NCE) 
21-41 
Authorized Bridge Alteration (NED) 1-14 
Avoca, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-29 
Avoca, WI (NCS) 24-32 
Avon Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-32 
Avon, OH (NCB) 20-45 
Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA (NAB) 4-14, 4-28 
B 
B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-21 
Bachelor Island, WA (NPP) 37-41 
Back Creek, MD (NAB) 4-35 
Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre, SD (MRO) 
26-25 
Badger Creek, Glacier City, MT (MRO) 26-31 
Badger Creek - Hwy 89, Browning, MT (MRO) 26-25 
Bagaduce River, ME (NED) 1-50, 1-55 
Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 
1-58 
Bailey Creek, Indianapolis, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Bainbridge, NY (NAB) 4-37 
Baker Brook, MA (NED) 1-58 
Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-2, 9-28, 9-37 
I-3

Baldwin Creek, Leader, WY 26-25 
Ball Mountain Lake, VT (NED) 1-18, 1-38 
Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD (Ferry Bar and 
Spring Garden Channel) (NAB) 4-39 
Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA (NAB) 
4-3, 4-25, 4-32 
Baltimore Harbor, MD Collection and Removal of 
Drift (NAB) 4-4, 4-25, 4-33 
Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Bank Stabilization & Channel Recertification (SWL) 
28-3 
Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL 
(NCR) 23-11, 23-14 
Banning Levee-39n Gorgonio River, Riverside County 
(SPL) 33-33 
Bar Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 
Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 
Bar Point Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Baraboo River, Rock Springs, WI (NCS) 24-30 
Barataria Bay Waterway, LA (LMN) 11-13 * 
Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 
Barbour Creek, Eufaula, AL (SAM) 10-49 
Barbourville, KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 
Barcelona Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-42 
Bardwell Lake, TX (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 
Barkley Dam and Lake, Barkley, KY and TN (ORN) 
15-14 
Barnard, KS (MRK) 27-17 
Barnegat Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-2, 3-17, 3-22 
Barnegat Light, NJ (NAP) 3-30 
Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River) (ORL) 16-28 
Barre Falls Dam, MA (NED) 1-18, 1-38 
Barren River Lake, KY (ORL) 16-5, 16-15 
Barrow, AK (NPA) 40-17 
Bartlett Pond, Plymouth, MA 1-60 
Bartley, NE (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 
Bass Harbor Bar, ME (NED) 1-50 
Bass Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 
Bassett Creek, MN (NCS) 24-4, 24-21 
Bastrop Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Batavia and Vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, NY (NCB) 
20-44 
Bath, NY (NAB) 4-37, 4-44 
Battery Pringle, SC (SAN) 7-8, 7-13, 7-18 
Battle Creek, NE (MRO) 26-25, 26-26 
Batts Chapel. Edgecome County, NC (SAW) 6-34 
Baudette Harbor, MN (NCS) 24-25 
Bay City Harbor, WI 25-7 
Bay Ridge, Red Hook Channels, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-27 
Bay River, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Bay St. Louis Seawall, MS (SAM) 10-52 
Bayard, WV (NAB) 4-37 
Bayfield Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-95 
Bayou Bartholomew, LA and MO (LMK) 12-16, 12-23 
Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, AR and LA (LMK) 
12-4, 12-9, 12-11, 12-18 
Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA 
(LMK) 12-20, 12-21 
Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 
Bayou Bonfouca, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Bayou Choupique, LA (LMN) 11-15 
Bayou Coden, AL (SAM) 10-6, 10-30, 10-37 
Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, 
LA (LMN) 11-13 
Bayou Dupre, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Bayou La Batre, AL (SAM) 10-7, 10-30, 10-37, 10-52 
Bayou Lacombe, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA 
(LMN) 11-13 
Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA (LMK) 12-19 
Bayou Pierre in Vicinity of Shreveport, LA (LMK) 
12-19, 12-20, 12-21 
Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Bayou Rapides, LA (LMN) 11-15 
Bayou Rigolette, LA (LMN) 11-11 
Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Bayou Teche & Vermillion River, LA (LMN) 114-13 
Bayou Teche, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Bayou Terrebonne, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Bayou Vermillion, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA (LMK) 12-16 
Bayport, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Bayport Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-4, 21-51, 21-75 
Baytown, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Bayview, MS (SAM) 10-52 
Bayview Court, Bay St. Louis, MS (SAM) 10-17, 10- 
33, 10-45 
Beach Erosion Control Activities Pursuant to Section 
103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) (NED) 
1-16, 1-64 
Beach Erosion Control Projects Under 
Construction B- 1-A 
I-4

Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special 
Authorization 
Baltimore District (NAB) 4-12 
Buffalo District (NCB) 20-11 
Charleston District (SAN) 7-9 
Chicago District (NCC) 22-8 
Detroit District (NCE) 21-41 
Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-22 
New York District (NAN) 2-13 
Norfolk District (NAO) 5-6, 5-9 
Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-2 
Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-11 
San Francisco District (SPN) 34-6 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-7 
Seattle District (NPS) 38-8 
Beach Point, Truro, MA (NED) 1-60 
Beal Slough, NE (MRO) 26-30 
Beals Creek, Big Spring, TX (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 
30-19 
Beals Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 
Bear Creek, County Road 485, Collin, TX (SWF) 
30-23 
Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, MO) (NCR) 
23-11, 23-14 
Bear Creek, Flathead County Bridge, near Essex, MT 
(NPS) 38-27 
Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID (NPW) 39-15 
Bear Creek Lake, CO (MRO) 26-2, 26-15, 26-21 
Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Bear Creek, Medford, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Bear River, CA (SPK) 35-41 
Bear Stream, CA (SPK) 35-43 
Beards Brook Reservoir, NH (NED) 1-58 
Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE (MRK) 27-18 
Beaufort Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-4, 6-20, 6-26 
Beaver Bay, MN (NCE) 21-95 
Beaver Brook, Keene, NH (NED) 1-55, 1-63 
Beaver Brook Lake, NH (NED) 1-58 
Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA (SAM) 10-50 
Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Beaver Creek, Platte County, NE (MRO) 26-31 
Beaver Lake, AR (SWL) 28-9, 28-16, 28-31 
Beaver Slough, OR (NPP) 37-43 
Beaverdam Creek, Clinton, NC (SAW) 6-34 
Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA (MRK) 27-17 
Beebe Lake, Frankfort, MN (NCS) 24-30 
Beech Fork, Bardstown, KY (ORL) 16-35 
Beech Fork Lake, WV (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 
Belfast Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 
Belhaven Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Bell Foley Lake, White River, AR (SWL) 28-22, 28-30 
Bellaire, OH (ORP) 18-24 
Bellamy River, NH (NED) 1-50 
Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River, SD (MRO) 26-25 
Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD (MRO) 26-21 
Belle River, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 
Bellevue, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Bellingham Harbor (I&J Street Waterway), WA (NPS) 
38-26 
Bellingham Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-21 
Bellville Point, GA (SAS) 8-21 
Belpre, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Beltline Road, Cottonwood Creek, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Belton Lake Modification, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Belton Lake, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 
Beltzville Lake, PA (NAP) 3-12, 3-20, 3-27 
Benbrook Lake, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 
Bennett Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River, 
IA (MRO) 26-27 
Bennington Reservoir, NH (NED) 1-58 
Bennington, VT (NAN) 2-32 
Benwood, WV (ORP) 18-22 
Beresford Creek, SC (SAN) 7-22 
Berkeley Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-13 
Berkeley Marina, CA (SPN) 34-13 
Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORP) 18-6, 18-13, 
18-19 
Berrien County, MI (St. Joseph Shore) beach erosion 
control (1958 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-97 
Bethel Bank, Kuskokwim River, AK (NPA) 40-16 
Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK (NPA) 40-7, 40-13, 
40-16 
Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-9, 
40-12, 40-15 
Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA (NAP) 3-29, 3-30 
Bettendorf, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 
Betterton Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-39 
Beverly Harbor, MA (NED) 1-50 
Beverly Hills, McLennan County, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Big (Cunningham) Creek, OH (NCB) 20-42 
Big and Little Sallisaw Navigation Project (SWT) 29-25 
Big Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-4, 21-51, 21-75 
I-5

Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 
(MRO) 26-11, 26-19, 26-24 
Big Bend Wildlife Restoration (MRO) 26-28 
Big Bend, WV (ORH) 17-23 
Big Black River, MS (LMK) 12-16 
Big Blue Lake, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-33 
Big Blue River, Seward, NE (MRK) 27-17 
Big Brown Creek, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-50 
Big Choctaw Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-21 
Big Creek and L' Anguille River, White River Basin, 
AR (LMM) 13-6 
Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN (LMM) 13-5 
Big Darby, OH (ORH) 17-23 
Big Dry Creek Dam and Diversion, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Big Fork River, MN (NCS) 24-5, 24-21 
Big Fossil Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, Near Twin 
Bridges, MT (MRO) 26-20 
Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin, MT 
(MRO) 26-25 
Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 
23-11, 23-14 
Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24 
Big Pine Lake, TX (SWT) 29-26 
Big River Reservoir, RI (NED) 1-58 
Big Run, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 
Big Sandy Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Big Sandy River, WV & KY (ORH) 17-20 
Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-21 
Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, Near Flandreau, SD 
(MRO) 26-25 
Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh, SD (MRO) 26-26 
Big Sioux River, Jefferson, SD (MRO) 26-26 
Big Sioux River, North Sioux City, SD (MRO) 26-25 
Big Sioux River, Plymouth County, IA (MRO) 26-27 
Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau, SD 
(MRO) 26-25 
Big Sioux River, Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-27 
Big Sioux River Sioux Falls, SD (MRO) 26-28 
Big Sioux River, Union County, SD (MRO) 26-25 
Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, 
KY and TN (ORN), 15-4, 15-9 
Big Spring, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD 
(NCS) 24-6, 24-21, 24-32 
Big Stranger Creek, KS (MRK) 27-17 
Big Suamico Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-4, 21-52, 21-75 
Big Sunflower River, MS (LMK) 12-16 
Big Swan D&L District, Illinois River, IL (LSM) 14-17 
Big Thompson River, Johnstown, CO (MRO) 26-26 
Big Timber Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 
Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 
16-33 
Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT (SPK) 35-39 
Big Wills Creek, AL (SAM) 10-57 
Big Wood River, ID (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 
Billings, MT (MRO) 26-23 
Biloxi Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-7, 10-30, 10-38, 10-52 
Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, MS 
(SAM) 10-50 
Binghamton, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-29 
Birch Hill Dam, MA (NED) 1-18, 1-38 
Birch Lake, OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-14, 29-23 
Birch, WV (ORH) 17-23 
Bird Rock Area, La Jolla, San Diego County, CA 
(SPL) 33-36 
Biscayne Bay, FL Hurricane Protection (SAJ) 9-52 
Bitterroot River, Florence, MT (NPS) 38-27 
Black Bayou Lake, LA (LMK) 12-20 
Black Bayou Reservoir, LA (LMK) 12-21 
Black Bear & Miller Lakes, Crow Wing County, MN 
(NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
Black Creek, Gadsden, AL (SAM) 10-50 
Black Fork at Hendricks, WV (ORP) 18-23 
Black River (Alcona County), MI (NCE) 21-95 
Black River (North Bend), WI (NCS) 24-31 
Black River (Port Huron), MI (NCE) 21-4, 21-52, 
21-75 
Black River, Amsterdam Road, WI (NCS) 24-32 
Black River, AR and MO (SWL) 28-21 
Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO (SWL) 
28-22 
Black River Falls, WI (NCS) 24-29 
Black River Harbor, Alcona County, MI Authorized 
Dec. 17, 1979 under Section 201 of the 1965 
Flood Control Act (NCE) 21-97 
Black River Harbor, MI (1936 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-97 
Black River Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-5, 21-52, 21-76 
Black River Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-42 
Black River Lake, WI (NCS) 24-28 
Black River, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-30 
Black River Obstruction Removal, Butler County, AR 
(SWL) 28-5, 28-14 
I-6

Black River, Poplar Bluff, MO, to Knobel, AR (SWL) 
28-22 
Black River, WI (NCS) 24-25, 24-28, 24-29, 24-30 
Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY, 
1935 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 
Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 
(NCB) 20-2, 20-19, 20-30 
Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY, 
1954 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 
Black Rock Harbor, CT (NED) 1-50 
Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 
1-58 
Black Rock Lake, CT (NED) 1-22 
Black Walnut Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-35 
Black Walnut Point, MD (NAB) 4-37 
Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL (SAM) 
10-8, 10-31, 10-38 
Black Warrior River, North Port, AL (SAM) 10-52 
Black Warrior River, U.S. Hwy 11 Bridge, Fosters, 
AL (SAM) 10-50 
Blackberry Creek, Henry County, VA (SAW) 6-10, 
6-22 
Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE (MRO) 26-21 
Blackboy Creek, Tulsa County, OK (SWT) 29-28 
Blackfoot Reservoir, ID (NPW) 39-16 
Blackfoot River, ID (NPW) 39-17 
Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT (NPS) 38-27 
Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI (NED) 1-16 
Blackstone River, Millbury, MA (NED) 1-55 
Blackstone River, Warwick, MA (NED) 1-62 
Blackwater, Concord, NH (NED) 1-65 
Blackwater Dam, NH (NED) 1-24, 1-40 
Blackwater River, Milton, FL (SAM) 10-49, 10-54 
Blackwater River, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-16 
Blaine Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR (LMK) 12-18, 
12-21 
Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR 
(NPP) 37-39 
Blue Marsh Lake, PA (NAP) 3-13, 3-20, 3-27 
Blue Mountain Lake, AR (SWL) 28-5, 28-14 
Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO (MRK) 27-2, 
27-11, 27-14 
Blue River Lake, OR (NPP) 37-13, 37-28, 37-36, 
37-44 
Blue River, Salem, IN (ORL) 16-24 
Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-3, 
17-12, 17-17 
Bluff Creek, MS (SAM) 10-49 
Bluffs Community Center, Swansea, MA (NED) 1-16, 
1-37, 1-50 
Bodega Bay, CA (SPN) 34-7 
Bodie Island, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Boeuf River, LA (LMK) 12-16 
Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA (NPS) 
38-27 
Bogachiel River, Undie Road, near Forks, WA (NPS) 
38-27 
Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL (SAM) 10-17, 10-34, 
10-46 
Boggy Creek, Bryan County, OK (SWT) 29-29 
Boggy Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Boise River, ID (NPW) 39-15 
Boise Valley, ID (NPW) 39-16 
Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL (SAM) 10-50 
Bolivar, NY (ORP) 18-29 
Bolles Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-5, 21-52, 21-76 
Bon Secour River, AL (SAM) 10-10, 10-31, 10-40, 
10-52 
Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville, OR and 
WA (NPP) 37-17, 37-29, 37-36, 37-44 
Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and 
WA (NPP) 37-2, 37-25, 37-32, 3-44 
Bonneville, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Bonum Creek, VA (NAB), 4-35 
Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) (ORL) 
16-23, 16-28 
Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-24, 
16-32 
Boothbay Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 
Boston Harbor, MA (1945 Act) (NED) 1-58 
Boston Harbor, MA (NED) 1-3, 1-32, 1-44 
Boswell Lake, OK (SWT) 29-26 
Boulder, CO (MRO) 26-23 
Bound Brook, Scituate, MA (NED) 1-55 
Bowman-Haley Lake, ND (MRO) 26-3, 26-15, 26-21 
Boyer Chute, NE (MRO) 26-10, 26-18, 26-24, 26-40 
Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA (ORP) 18-24 
Bradenton Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-63 
Bradford, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 
Bradford, TN (LMM) 13-5 
I-7

Bradley Lake, AK (NPA) 40-16 
Brake Branch, Montgomery County, VA (SAW) 6-30 
Bramwell, WV (ORH) 17-24 
Branch Creek, Del City, OK (SWT) 29-28 
Branford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-50 
Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River. VA (NAB) 
4-35 
Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA (NED) 1-58 
Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO (MRK) 27-17 
Brays Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 
Brazos Island Harbor, (SWG) 31-2, 31-20, 31-25, 
31-40, 31-41, 31-43, 31-48 
Brazos River, Velasco to Old Washington, TX (SWG) 
31-37 
Breton Bay, MD (NAB) 4-35, 4-39 
Brevard County, FL (SAJ) 9-15, 9-33, 9-48 
Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 
16-32 
Bridge, Mary Creek, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Bridgeport Harbor, CT (NED) 1-50, 1-61 
Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 
1-58 
Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood 
River, OR (Alteration) (NPP) 37-38 
Bridgewater, VA (NAB) 4-37, 4-45 
Brigantine Island (NAP) 3-29 
Brilliant, OH (ORP) 18-24 
Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI (NED) 1-50 
Broad Creek, Beaufort, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Broad Creek, MD (NAB) 4-4, 4-25, 4-33 
Broad Creek River, DE (NAB) 4-35 
Broad Creek, VA (NAO) 5-2, 5-5, 5-12, 5-16 
Broad Top Region, PA (NAB) 4-13, 4-28, 4-37 
Broadkill River, DE (NAP) 3-27 
Broadwater Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 
Broadway Street, Pecan Creek, Gainsville, TX (SWF) 
30-23 
Brockway Lake, VT (NED) 1-58 
Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 18-24 
Broken Bow Lake, OK (SWT) 29-11, 29-20, 29-25 
Broken Bow, Mud Creek, NE (MRO) 26-26 
Bromley, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Bronx River, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-27, 2-32 
Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO (MRK) 27-17 
Brookgreen Gardens, SC (SAN) 7-20 
Brooklyn, WV (ORH) 17-22 
Brookport, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 
Brookville Lake, KY (ORL) 16-5, 16-15 
Brookville, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 
Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control and 
Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project (SAJ) 9-16, 
9-33, 9-49 
Browder Creek, Springton, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Browns Creek, NY (NAN) 2-3, 2-16, 2-19, 2-23, 2-28 
Browns Creek, Nashville, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Brownwood Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Brunswick County Beaches (Cape Fear to North 
Carolina - South Carolina State Line), NC (SAW) 
6-30 
Brunswick County Beaches - Long Beach Portion - 
Berm, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Brunswick Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-3, 8-13, 8-17 
Brush Creek, Jeanette, PA (planning and design 
analysis) (ORP) 18-30 
Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO (MRK) 27-3, 27-11, 
27-14 
Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, 
CA (SPK) 35-5, 35-28 
Buck Creek, NC & SC (SAN) 7-21 
Buck Ditch, Ft. Recovery (ORL) 16-35 
Buckhannon River, WV (ORP) 18-21 
Buckhannon, WV (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 
Buckhorn Lake, KY (ORL) 16-5, 16-15, 16-31 
Buckland, AK (NPA) 40-18 
Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME (NED) 1-50 
Bucksport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 
Buena Vista, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX (SWG) 31-11, 
31-22, 31-38 
Buffalo Bayou at Lynchburg, TX (SWG) 31-13 
Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point Village, TX (SWG) 
31-13, 31-21 
Buffalo Creek, Freeport, PA (planning and design 
analysis) (ORP) 18-30 
Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, Scranton, ND (MRO) 
26-21 
Buffalo Harbor Drift Removal, NY (NCB) 20-47 
Buffalo Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-2, 20-19, 20-31 
Buffalo, Johnson County, Diversion Channel, WY 
(MRO) 26-23 
Buffalo River, MS (LMK) 12-23 
Buffalo Ship Channel, Buffalo, NY (NCB) 20-47 
Buffalo Small Boat Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-3, 20-14, 
20-26 
I-8

Buffumville Lake, MA (NED) 1-28, 1-42, 1-70 
Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA (SAM) 10-24, 
10-35 
Bull Run, PA (NAB) 4-37 
Bull Shoals Lake, AR (SWL) 28-10, 28-17, 28-31 
Bullard Bend Chute Restoration, NE (MRO) 26-32 
Bullocks Point Cove, RI (NED) 1-4, 1-32, 1-45 
Bunker Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 
Burch Creek, Weber County, UT (SPK) 35-39 
Burgettstown, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 
Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT (NED) 1-54 
Burketts Creek, Amory, MS (SAM) 10-50 
Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND (NCS) 24-26 
Burlington Harbor, VT (NAN) 2-27 
Burlington, IA (NCR) 23-14 
Burney Crek, Shasta County, CA (SPK) 35-45 
Burns Stream, CA (SPK) 35-43 
Burns Waterway Harbor, IN (NCC) 22-2, 22-14, 
22-18, 22-22 
Burns Waterway SBH, IN (NCC) 22-2, 22-14, 22-18, 
22-22 
Burns Waterway Harbor (Maj. Rehab), IN (NCC) 
22-3, 22-14 
Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-3, 
17-12, 17-17 
Burnt River, OR (NWP) 39-17 
Burt-Washington Counties, NE (MRO) 26-28 
Butler County Drainage District 3, MO (SWL) 28-22 
Butler, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 
Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA (NED) 1-50 
Buttermilk Channel, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-27 
Bypass Levees, CA (SPK) 35-44 
Byram River at Pemberwick, CN (NAN) 2-30 
C 
Cabrillo Beach (SPL) 33-30 
Cache Creek Basin, (Cache Creek Settling Basin), CA 
(SPK) 35-6, 35-28, 35-39 
Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment 
Plant), CO (MRO) 26-26 
Cache La Poudre River, Greely, CO (MRO) 26-30 
Cache La Poudre River, Windsor, CO (MRO) 26-26 
Cache River Diversion, IL (LSM) 14-15 
Cache River Levee, IL (ORL) 16-32 
Cache River, Upper Basin, IL (ORL) 16-24 
Caddo Lake Dam, LA (LMK) 12-21 
Caddo Lake, LA (LMK) 12-19 
Cadet Bayou, MS (SAM) 10-49, 10-54 
Cadle Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 
Caesar Creek Lake, OH (ORL) 16-6, 16-15, 16-32 
Cagles Mill Lake, IN (ORL) 16-6, 16-15, 16-31 
Cahaba River, AL (SAM) 10-49 
Cairo, WV (ORH) 17-24 
Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II, Illinois Waterway, IL and 
IN (NCR) 23-13 
Calapooya River, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and Tributaries, 
including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, 
CA (SPK) 35-6, 35-28 
Calcasieu River and Pass, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Calcasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Caledonia, Genesee River, NY 1950 FC Act (NCB) 
20-47 
Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT (NED) 1-54 
Calhoun County (SAM) 10-57 
Caliente Creek, CA (SPK) 35-35 
Caliente Wash, AZ (SPL) 33-31 
California (Cincinnati), OH (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
California Bend, NE (MRO) 26-11, 26-18, 26-24, 
26-40 
Calion, AR (H.K. Thatcher) (LMK) 12-15, 12-18 
Calispell Creek, WA (NPS) 38-30 
Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Calloway Branch, Richland Hills, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (NCC) 22-3, 
22-14, 22-18, 22-22, 22-24 
Calumet River Bridges (NCC) 22-22 
Camas Creek, ID (NPW) 39-16 
Cambridge Harbor, MD (1948 River & Harbor Act) 
(NAB) 4-39 
Cambridge Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-35 
Cambridgeport Lake, VT (NED) 1-58 
Camden Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 
Camp Ellis Beach, Saco, ME (NED) 1-60 
Camp Facility, Red River, Telephone TX (SWT) 29-28 
Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) (ORL) 16-24 
Campbells Island, Mississippi River, IL (NCR) 23-13 
Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA 
(LMK) 12-19, 12-21 
Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY (NCB) 20-46 
Canal 43, AR (LMK) 12-4, 12-9, 12-11 
I-9

Canapitsit Channel, MA (NED) 1-50 . 
Canaseraga Creek, Dansville, NY (NCB) 20-46 
Canaveral Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-2, 9-28, 9-37 
Candy Lake, OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-15, 29-23 
Cane River, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Caney Creek, MS (LMK) 12-12 
Caney Fork River, Carthage, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Caney Fork River, TN (ORN) 15-13 
Canisteo, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-29 
Cannelton, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 
Cannon River at Fairbault, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
Cannon River near Welch, MN (NCS) 24-32 
Cannonball River, Sheilds, ND (MRO) 26-31 
Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 
Canton (Nimishillen), OH (ORH) 17-24 
Canton Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 
Canton Lake, OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-15, 29-23, 29-27 
Canton, MA (NED) 1-55 
Canton, MO (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 
Canyon County Unit (NPW) 39-16 
Canyon Lake, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 
Cape Charles, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Cape Cod Canal, MA (NED) 1-4, 1-32, 1-45 
Cape Fear River, Above Wilmington, NC (SAW) 6-4, 
6-19 
Cape Fear River Basin, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-32 
Cape Florida State park, FL (SAJ) 9-52 
Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO (LSM) 14-3, 14-8, 14-11 
Cape Girardeau, MO No. 2, MO (LSM) 14-15 
Cape Girardeau, MO Reaches Nos. 1, 3 and 4 (LSM) 
14-17. 
Cape Lookout, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Cape May City, NJ (NAP) 3-30 
Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ (NAP) 3-11 
Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 
Cape Vincent Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-42 
Cape Vincent Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act (NCB) 
20-47 
Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas 
River, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Carlson Bottoms Wetland Restoration (MRO) 26-32 
Carlyle Lake, IL (LSM) 14-15 
Carneros Creek, CA (SPL) 33-12, 33-21 
Carolina Beach and Vicinity, NC (SAW) 6-10, 6-21 
Carpenters Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 
Carr Fork Lake, KY (ORL) 16-6, 16-15, 16-31 
Carrabelle Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-49, 10-54 
Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL (NCR) 
23-13 
Carrollton, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Carters Creek, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-16 
Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA (SAM) 10-25, 10-35 
Caruthersville Harbor, MO (LMM) 13-4 
Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME (NED) 1-50 
Cascadia Lake, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Caseville Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-6, 21-53, 21-76 
Caseyville, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Cashie River, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Casino Beach, IL (NCC) 22-6, 22-16, 22-20 
Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA (NPP) 37-40 
Castlewood Lake, Douglas County, CO (MRO) 26-23 
Cat Claw Creek, Abilene, TX (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 
Catching Inlet Drainage District, Coos River, OR 
(NPP) 37-40 
Cathance River, ME (NED) 1-50 
Catherine Creek Lake, OR (NPW) 39-12, 39-16 
Catherine Creek, OR (NPW) 39-13, 39-15 
Cathlamet, WA (NPP) 37-38 
Cato Springs Branch and Town Branch, Fayetteville, 
AR (SWL) 28-5, 28-15 
Cattaraugus Creek, NY (NCB) 20-42 
Cattaraugus Creek, Village of Arcade, NY (NCB) 
20-46 
Cattaraugus Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-4, 20-20, 20-32 
Cattlesburg, KY (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
Cave-in-Rock, IL (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Cave Run Lake, KY (ORL) 16-7, 16-15, 16-31 
Cave Springs, GA (SAM) 10-57 
Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, NY (NCB) 20-44 
Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN (ORL) 16-7, 16-15, 16-31 
Cedar Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD (MRO) 26-21 
Cedar Creek, Sussex City, DE (NAP) 3-27 
Cedar Falls, Cedar River, IA (NCR) 23-15 
Cedar Island, Keaton Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Cedar Key Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Cedar Point, GA (SAS) 8-21 
Cedar Point Lake, KS (SWT) 29-27 
Cedar River Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-53, 21-76 
Cedar River, Kenton, WA (NPS) 38-27, 38-31 
Cedar River, King County, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Celina Dam, KY (ORN) 15-14 
Center Hill Dam Safety Program (ORN) 15-7 
I-10

Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN (ORN) 15-6, 
-15-9, 15-17 
Central and Southern Florida (SAJ) 9-21, 9-34, 9-50 
Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA (NCR) 
23-13 
Century Park, Lorain, OH (NCB) 20-20, 20-40 
Ceredo-Kenova, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
Chacon Creek, Laredo, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Chadakoin River, Jamestown, NY (construction) (ORP) 
18-30 
Chagrin River, East Branch, Route 84, OH (NCB) 
20-46 
Chambersburg, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Channel between North & South Hero Islands, VT 
(NAN) 2-27 
Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak 
Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 
Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar 
Bay, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Channel Connecting York River, VA Back Creek to 
Slaights Wharf (NAO) 5-16 
Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, NC 
(SAW) 6-5, 6-20 
Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-3, 
9-28, 9-37 
Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, NC (SAW) 
6-28 
Channel from Phoebus, VA to deepwater in Hampton 
Roads (NAO) 5-16 
Channel Islands Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-14, 33-22 
Channel to Liberty, TX (SWG) 31-9 
Channel to Newport News, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-12, 
5-16, 5-21, 5-24 
Channel to Port Bolivar, TX(SWG) 31-3, 31-20, 31 26, 
31-41, 31-43 
Channels in Straits of Mackinac, MI (NCE) 21-95, 
21-101 
Chaplin River, Perryville, KY (ORL) 16-23 
Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act) (MRK) 
27-17 
Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell 
Fork Units only (MRK) 27-18 
Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) (MRK) 27-17 
Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA 
(NED) 1-16, 1-37, 1-50 
Charles River Dam, MA (NED) 1-55 
Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Charleston Harbor (Anchorage Basin), SC (SAN) 7-22 
Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC (SAN) 
7-3, 7-11, 7-16 
Charleston Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-2, 7-11, 7-15 
Charlestown, NH (NED) 1-55, 1-63 
Charlevoix Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-6, 21-53, 21-76 
Charlotte County, FL (SAJ) 9-47 
Charlotte Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-3, 9-28, 9-37 
Chartiers Creek, PA (ORP) 18-4, 18-13, 18-29 
Chaska, MN (NCS) 24-6, 24-21 
Chatfield Lake, CO (MRO) 26-3, 26-15, 26-21 
Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (NED) 1-4, 1-32, 1-45, 
1-71 
Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL (SAM) 10-50 
Chattooga Units, GA (SAS) 8-23 
Chauvin Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-5, 12-10 
Cheat River, WV (ORP) 18-21 
Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN (ORN) 15-14 
Cheyboygan Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-7, 21-53, 21-76 
Cheboygan Harbor, Isle Royale, MI (NCE) 21-95 
Cheesequake Creek (NAN) 2-26, 2-27, 2-32 
Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, 
WA (NPS) 38-8, 38-17, 38-23 
Chehalis River, City of Chehalis, Raw Water 
Pumphouse, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, 
WA (NPS) 38-27 
Chehalis River, Montesano, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Chena River Lakes, AK (NPA) 40-7, 40-13 
Chena River Stabilization, AK (NPA) 40-7, 40-11, 
40-14 
Cherokee County, GA (SAM) 10-57 
Cherry and Red Fork Creeks LPP, OK (SWT) 29-26, 
29-28 
Cherry Creek Lake, CO (MRO) 26-4, 26-15, 26-21 
Cherryfield, ME (NED) 1-55 
Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, St. Georges Bridge 
Replacement, DE, (NAP) 3-2, 3-17, 3-22 
Chesapeake Bay at Hoopersville Road, MD (NAB) 
4-37 
Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, MD (NAB) 4-13, 4- 
28, 4-37 
Chesapeake, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Chesconessex Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Chesire, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Chester, CA (SPK) 35-39 
I-11

Chester River, MD (1873 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 
4-39 
Chester River, MD (NAB) 4-4, 4-25, 4-33 
Chetco River, OR (NPP) 37-2, 37-25, 37-32 
Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Chicago Harbor, IL (NCC) 22-3, 22-14, 22-18, 22-22 
Chicago River, IL (NCC) 22-4, 22-15, 22-19, 22-22 
Chicago River, IL (North Branch) (NCC) 22-8, 22-16 
Chicago Shoreline, IL (NCC) 22-7, 22-16 
Chickasaw Bouge Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, 
Linden, AL (SAM) 10-50 
Chickasawhay River, MS (SAM) 10-57 
Chickasha, OK (SWT) 29-28, 29-30 
Chico Landing, CA (SPK) 35-41 
Chicopee Falls, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-63 
Chicopee, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-63 
Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 
Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA (NPS) 
38-12, 38-19, 38-24 
Chillicothe, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
Chilo, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Chincoteague Bay, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Chincoteague Inlet, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-12, 5-16, 5-24 
Chino Canyon Improvements, Palm Springs, CA SPL) 
33-39 
Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royal, MI (NCE) 21-95 
Chippewa River, Montevideo, MN (NCS) 24-30 
Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, NY 1944 R&H Act 
(NCB) 20-47 
Choctawatchee Bay to Pensacola, FL (SAM) 10-42 
Choctawatchee Bay to West Bay, FL (SAM) 10-41 
Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, FL and AL (SAM) 
10-17, 10-33, 10-45 
Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL (SAM) 10-49 
Choptank River, MD (NAB) 4-35 
Choteau Lock and Dam (No. 17) (SWL) 28-26 
Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK (SWT) 29-27 
Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage District and 
Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-15 
Chowan River, NC (NAO) 5-16 
Chowan River, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, VI (SAJ) 9-51 
Chubb Run, Franklin, PA (construction) (ORP) 18-30 
Church Run, Titusville, PA (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 
Cibolo Creek, TX (SWA) 32-18 
Cincinnati, OH (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 
Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
City Creek Levee, San Bernardino County, CA (SPL) 
33-37 
City Dam, Little Caney River, KS (SWT) 29-29 
City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO (MRO) 26-21 
City of Isleton, CA (SPK) 35-45 
Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR (NPP) 
37-40 
Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-3, 10-30 
Clairborne County Port, MS (LMK) 12-16 
Clairborne Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-35 
Clallam Bay at Sekiu, Clallam County, WA (NPS) 
38-9, 38-17, 38-23, 38-27 
Clallam River, Highway 112, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Clanton, AL (SAM) 10-50 
Claremont Lake, NH (NED) 1-58 
Claremore, OK (SWT) 29-30 
Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Salt River, 
MO (LSM) 14-6, 14-9, 14-13 
Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir, OH (ORL) 
16-7 
Clarendon to Laconia Circle White River Basin, AR 
(LMM) 13-6 
Clarington, OH (ORP) 18-24 
Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT (NPS) 38-27 
Clark Fort River, Drummond, MT (NPS) 38-27 
Clark Fort River, Superior, MT (NPS) 38-27 
Clark Fort River, Vicinity of Plains, MT (NPS) 38-27 
Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA (NED) 1-54 
Clark Spring Branch, Decatur, AL (ORN) 15-8 
Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek, NE (MRO) 
26-21 
Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek (MRO) 26-21, 26-26 
Clarksville, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Clatskanie Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 
37-41 
Clatskanie River, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Clayton County, AL (SAM) 10-57 
Clayton County Bridge, Osterdock, IA (NCR) 23-16 
Clayton County, Elkport, Osterdock, IA (NCR) 23-16 
Clayton County Road Creek, Site 2, IA (NCR) 23-16 
1-12

Clayton, IA (NCS) 24-32 
Clear & Burnt River, OR (NPW) 39-13, 39-15 
Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 
14-17 
Clear Creek, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-22, 31-38 
Clear River, Burrilville, RI (NED) 1-55, 1-62 
Clearwater Lake, MO (SWL) 28-5, 28-15, 28-31 
Clearwater Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Clearwater River, ID (NPW) 39-17 
Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA (NPS) 
38-27 
Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA (NPS) 
38-27 
Cleveland Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-4, 20-20, 20-32 
Cleves, OH (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Cliff Walk, Newport, RI (NED) 1-14, 1-37, 1-49 
Clifton, AZ (SPL) 33-6, 33-17, 33-29 
Clifton, San Francisco River, AZ (SPL) 33-37 
Clifton, WV (ORH) 17-22 
Clifty Creek Lake, IN (ORL) 16-26 
Clinch River, TN and VA (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 
Clinton Harbor, CT (NED) 1-50 
Clinton Harbor, IA 25-7 
Clinton, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 
Clinton, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS (MRK) 27-3, 
27-11, 27-14 
Clinton River, MI (NCE) 21-8, 21-54, 21-76 
Clinton River Spillway, MI (NCE) 21-42, 21-72, 21-89 
Cloverport, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Clyde Park, Shields River (MRO) 26-24 
Clyde, RI (NED) 1-58 
Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN (ORN) 
15-13 
Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 
23-11, 23-14 
Coal Grove, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Coal River, WV (ORH) 17-21 
Coan River, VA (NAB) 4-39 
Coast of California, Point Mugu, to San Pedro 
Breakwater, CA (SPL) 33-36 
Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration 
Act 
New Orleans District (LMN) 11-7 
Coasters Island Harbor, RI (NED) 1-50 
Cobscook Bay, ME (NED) 1-50 
Cocheco River, NH (NED) 1-50, 1-55 
Cochiti Lake, NM (SWA) 32-5, 32-12, 32-15 
Cochiti Wetfields, NM (SWA) 32-2, 32-12, 32-15 
Cochrane, Mississippi River, WI (NCS) 24-29 
Cockrells Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID (NPS) 38-27 
Coeur d'Alene, Springston, ID (NPS) 38-27 
Coffee County, AL (SAM) 10-57 
Coffee Creek, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Cohansey River, NJ (NAP) 3-2, 3-17, 3-22 
Cohasset Harbor, MA (NED) 1-50 
Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory 43-1 
Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-3, 3-17, 3-22 
Coldwater Creek, MO (LSM) 14-3, 14-11 
Colebrook River Lake, CT (NED) 1-18, 1-38 
Colfax, Grant Parish, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 
Colfax, Palouse River, WA (NPW) 39-13, 39-15 
Collection and Study of Basic Data 
Alaska District (NPA) 40-9 
Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-10 
Baltimore District (NAB) 4-24 
Buffalo District (NCB) 20-18 
Chicago District (NCC) 22-13 
Detroit District (NCE) 21-50 
Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-13 
Galveston District (SWG) 31-19 
Huntington District (ORH) 17-11 
Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-26 
Little Rock District (SWL) 28-12 
Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-12 
Louisville District (ORL) 16-13 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-28 
Nashville District (ORN) 15-8 
New England Division (NED) 1-31 
New York District (NAN) 2-15 
Norfolk District (NAO) 5-11 
Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-3 
Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 
Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 
Portland District (NPP) 37-24 
Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 
Sacramento District (SPK) 35-26 
San Francisco District (SPN) 34- 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 
Seattle District (NPS) 38-13 
St. Paul District (NCS) 24-20 
Tulsa District (SWT) 29-13 
I-13

Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-12 
Wilmington District (SAW) 6-18 
Colliers, WV (ORP) 18-29 
Collinsville, AL (SAM) 10-50 
Collinsville, CA (SPK) 35-41 
Colonial Beach, VA (NAB) 4-12, 4-27, 4-36 
Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO (SPK) 35-7, 
35-29, 35-45 
Colorado River at Riverside, CO (SPK) 35-45 
Colorado River, Matagorda, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, CO 
(Templeton Gap Floodway) (SWA) 32-18 
Colquitt County, GA (SAM) 10-57 
Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below 
Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (NPP) 37-2, 
37-25, 37-32, 37-42 
Columbia and Snake Rivers Ports Dredging, OR and 
WA (NPP) 37-18, 37-29, 37-37 
Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL 
(LSM) 14-15 
Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Columbia, LA (LMK) 12-15, 12-18 
Columbia River above The Dalles, OR & WA (NPP) 
27-42 
Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to 
Kennewick, WA (NPW) 39-15 
Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA (NPP) 37-4, 37-25, 
37-33 
Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA (NPP) 
37-4, 37-25, 37-33 
Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects 
(NPW) 39-2, 39-16 
Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, 
MT, and WA (NPS) 38-27, 38-30 
Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of 
Sand Island (NPP) 37-4, 37-25, 37-33 
Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The 
Dalles, OR (NPP) 37-5, 37-25, 37-33 
Columbia River, Chinook, WA (NPP) 37-42 
Columbia River, Illwaco, WA (NPP) 37-38 
Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program (The Dalles, 
Project), OR and WA (NPP) 37-19, 37-29, 37-37 
Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program 
(Walla Walla District) (NPW) 39-5, 39-13, 39-17 
Columbia River, Kalama, WA OR (NPP) 37-41 
Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR 
(NPP) 37-5, 37-25, 37-33 
Columbia River Treaty Fishing Sites, OR and WA 
(NPP) 37-19, 37-29, 37-37 
Columbia River, Vancouver Deep Draft Anchorage, 
WA (NPP) 37-6, 37-25, 37-33 
Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA (NPS) 
38-26 
Columbia Slough, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Columbus Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, 
Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-27 
Columbus, IN (ORL) 16-24 
Columbus, Loup River, NE (MRO) 26-26 
Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-57 
Columbus, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Colusa, CA (SPK) 35-41 
Comite River, LA (Diversion) (LMN) 11-3, 11-9, 
11-12 
Communities, Chicago, IL (NCC) 22-22 
Compo Beach, Westport, CT (NED) 1-54 
Conant Brook Dam, MA (NED) 1-19, 1-38 
Conchas Lake, NM (SWA) 32-3, 32-11 
Concordia, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 
18-6, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 
Conetoe Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Coney Island Channel (NAN) 2-27 
Coney Island Creek (NAN) 2-32 
Congaree River, SC (SAN) 7-22 
Conklin-Kirkwood, NY (NAB) 4-37, 4-44 
Conneaut Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-5, 20-20, 20-35 
Conneaut Lake, PA (planning and design analysis) 
(ORP) 18-30 
Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT (NED) 1-58 
Connecticut River Basin Fish Passage Facilities for 
Townshend and Connecticut River Basin, VT, 
NH, MA and CT (NED) 1-17 
Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (NED) 1-5, 
1-33, 1-45 
Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (uncompleted 
portion) (NED) 1-58 
Connecticut River, Middletown, CT (NED) 1-19, 1-38, 
1-50 
Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH (NED) 1-55, 
1-61 
Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH (NED) 1-55 
Connell, WA (NPW) 39-15 
Connellsville, PA (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 
Conoho Creek, NC (SAW) 6-31 
1-14

Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, 
Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-39 
Construction Engineering Research Laboratory 42-1 
Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORL) 
16-2 
Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (ORH) 
17-2 
Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (ORD) 
19-1, 19-5, 19-7 
Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORP) 
18-2 
Contentnea Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-30, 6-31 
Continuation of Planning and Engineering 
Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-11 
Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-26 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-32 
Continuing Authorities Program (MRK) 27-8 
Conway County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, 
Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, 
AR (SWL) 28-22 
Conway County Levee District Nos. 1, 2 and 8, 
Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Cook Inlet Shoals, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Cooper Lake and Channels, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 
30-19 
Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-3, 
7-11, 7-16 
Cooper River, NJ (NAP) 3-27 
Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC (SAN) 7-22 
Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC (SAN) 7-21 
Coordination with other Agencies (ORL) 16-13 
Coos & Millicoma Rivers, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Coos Bay, OR (NPP) 37-6, 37-26, 37-33 
Coos Bay Western Snowy Plover (NPP) 37-43 
Coosa River, GA (SAM) 10-49, 10-57 
Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL (SAM) 
10-4, 10-30 
Coosawattee, Ellijay and Cartecay Rivers, Vicinity of 
Ellijay, GA (SAM) 10-57 
Copan Lake, OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-15, 29-23 
Copes Corner Lakes, NY (NAB) 4-39 
Coquille River, OR (NPP) 37-7, 37-26, 37-34, 37-41 
Coralville Lake, IA (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-10 
Coraopolis, PA (ORP) 18-24 
Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 
Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN (ORN) 15-14 
Cordova, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Cordova Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-9, 40-12, 40-15, 
40-17 
Core Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME (NED) 1-50 
Comrning-Monkey Run, NY (NAB) 4-44 
Corning, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-29 
Cornucopia Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-8, 21-54, 21-77 
Corporation Gulch, Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-25 
Corpus Christi Beach (Restoration Project), TX (SWG) 
31-11, 31-21, 31-37 
Corpus Christi, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base 
Encinal, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Corpus Christi Channel, TX (SWG) 31-3, 31-20, 
31-26, 31-39, 31-40, 31-43, 31-48 
Corsica River, MD (NAB) 4-35 
Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ (NAP) 3-20 
Corte Madera Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 
Corte Madre Creek, CA (SPK) 35-8, 35-29, 35-36 
Cortland, NY (NAB) 4-37, 4-44 
Cottage Grove Lake, OR (NPP) 37-13, 37-28, 37-36, 
37-44 
Cottonwood Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Culdesac, ID 
(NWP) 39-15 
Cottonwood Creek Dam; Boise, ID (NPW) 39-16 
Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL (LMM) 13-5 
Cotuit Harbor, MA (NED) 1-58 
Cougar Lake, OR (NPP) 37-19, 37-29, 37-37, 37-44 
Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) (MRO) 26-21 
Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) (MRO) 26-21 
Council Bluffs, IA (MRO) 26-24, 26-27 
Council Grove Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-15, 29-23 
County Bridge, Elk River, Elk City, KS (SWT) 29-29 
County Bridge, Washita River, Arkansas City, KS 
(SWT) 29-29 
County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba County, MS 
(SAM) 10-50 
County Road 55, Etowah County, AL (SAM) 10-18, 
10-33, 10-45 
County Road, Neosho River, KS (SWT) 29-29 
Courtnay Channel, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Cove Island, Stamford, CT (NED) 1-54 
Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-64 
Covington County, MS (SAM) 10-57 
Covington, KY (ORL) 16-23 
Cow Castle Creek, SC (SAN) 7-21, 7-24 
I-15

Cow Creek, Hutchinson, KS (SWT) 29-27 
Cowanesque Lake, PA (NAB) 4-21, 4-30 
Cowlitz County Consolidate Diking Improvement 
District 1, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement 
District No. 2, WA (NPP) 37-39 
Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA 
(NPP) 37-39 
Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA 
(NPP) 37-39 
Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA 
(NPP) 37-39 
Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, WA 
(NPP) 37-39 
Cowlitz River at Randle, WA (NPP) 37-41 
Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA (NPP) 37-39 
Cowlitz River, WA (NPP) 37-38 
Cowpens Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-21 
Cowskin Creek, Haysville, KS (SWT) 29-28 
Cox Run, Wellsburg, WV (completed) (ORP) 18-30 
Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, CA (SPL) 33-37 
Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR 
(NPP) 37-41 
Coyote Creek (Known as Coyote and Berryessa 
Creeks), CA (SPK) 35-9, 35-35, 35-39 
Coyote Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 
Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) Channel 
Improvement below Dam on Lower 98 miles of 
Russian River, CA (SPK) 35-43, 35-44 
Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA (NPS) 38-30 
Crabtree Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-21 
Craig, AK (NPA) 40-17 
Craig Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-9, 40-12, 40-15 
Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 
23-11, 23-14 
Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&H Act (NCB) 
20-47 
Cranes Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Crawford County Levee District, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Creede, Willow Creek, CO (Floodway) (SWA) 32-18 
Crescent City Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-7 
Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL (SAM) 10-18, 
10-34, 10-46 
Criehaven Harbor, ME (NED) 1-6, 1-33, 1-45 
Crisfield Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-25, 4-33 
Crooked Creek, City Garage, Madison, IN (ORL) 
16-35 
Crooked Creek, Harrison, AR (SWL) 28-6, 28-15 
Crooked Creek, J. Paul Park, Madison, IN (ORL) 
16-35 
Crooked Creek Lake and Levee, AR (SWL) 28-23 
Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 
18-7, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 
Crooked Creek, Union County, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Crookston, MN (NCS) 24-32 
Cross Creek, Fayetteville, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Cross Florida Barge Canal, (SAJ) 9-4, 9-29, 9-38 
Cross Lake, NY (NCB) 20-45 
Cross Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA (NED) 1-50 
Cross Village, MI (NCE) 21-95 
Crow River, Rockford, MN (NCS) 24-32 
Crows Nest Channel, NC (SAW) 6-32 
Crutcho Creek LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26 
Crystal River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Cuckold Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 
Cuivre River, MO (LSM) 14-14 
Cumberland, KY (ORN) 15-9, 15-17 
Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV (NAB) 4-13, 
4-28, 4-37 
Cumberland River above Nashville, TN (ORN) 15-11 
Cumberland River below Nasvhille, TN (ORN) 15-11 
Cumberland River, Gholson Road, Montgomery 
County, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Cumberland River Metro Nashville Landfill (ORN) 
15-18 
Cumberland River Ted Rhodes Golf Course (ORN) 
15-18 
Cumberland River, TN and KY (ORN) 15-2, 15-9, 
15-15 
Cummings Park, Stamford, CT (NED) 1-54 
Cunninghill Cove, MD (NAB) 4-39 
Curia Creek Drainage District, Independence County, 
AR (SWL) 28-22 
Current River, AR and MO (SWL) 28-21 
Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA (SAS) 8-22 
Curwensville Lake, PA (NAB) 4-22, 4-31 
Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR 
(NPP) 37-38 
Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA (NED) 1-6, 1-33, 1-46 
Cuyahoga River, Brecksville Road, OH (NCB) 20-46 
Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, 
and Shreveport, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Cypress Bayou and Waterway Between Jefferson, TX 
and Shreveport, LA (LMK) 12-16 
1-16

Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY (ORL) 16-32, 
16-33 
Cypress Creek, MD (NAB) 4-35 
Cypress Creek, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-22, 31-38 
Cyril E. King Road, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-63 
D 
Dade County, FL (SAJ) 9-23, 9-34 
Dade County, North of Haulover Beach, FL (SAJ) 
9-23, 9-34 
Dale County, AL (SAM) 10-57 
Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY 
(ORN) 15-6, 15-9, 15-17 
Dallas Floodway, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Dam "A" Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22' 
Dam and Bridge, Neosho River, KS (SWT) 29-29 
Dam Safety Program (ORN) 15-7 
Damariscotta River, ME (NED) 1-50 
Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plan, NC 
(SAW) 6-30 
Dana Point, Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-35 
Danbury, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-64 
Dansville and Vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, NY (NCB) 
20-45 
Danville (Southside Wastewater Treatment Plant), VA 
(SAW) 6-10 
Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), AR (SWL) 28-10, 
28-17, 28-26 
Darien Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-21 
Dauphin Island, AL (SAM) 10-18, 10-33 
Dauphin Island Shoreline (SAM) 10-18, 10-34 
Davenport Center Lake, NY (NAB) 4-39 
Davenport Harbor, IA (Lindsay Park) 25-7 . 
Davenport, IA (NCR) 23-13 
David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), AR (SWL) 
28-3, 28-25 
Davids Creek Lake, IA (MRO) 26-23 
Davis Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Davis, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) (NPP) 37-40 
Dayton, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 
Dayton, Touchet River, WA (NPW) 39-15 
Dayton, WY (MRO) 26-23 
Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD (MRO) 26-21, 26-26 
Deadman's Run, NE (MRO) 26-30 
Dearborn River - Hwy 287, Wolf Creek, MT (MRO) 
26-25 
Dearborn River, Lewis-Clark County, MT (MRO) 
26-31 
Deauthorization Projects 
New England Division (NED), 1-31, 1-61, 1-62, 
1-63, Buffalo District (NCB) 20-18, 20-52, New 
York District (NAN) 2-15, 2-28 
Dearmenville and Golden Springs, AL (SAM) 10-57 
Deep Creek, Accomack County, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Deep Creek, Newport News, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA (NPP) 
37-39 
Deep River, WA (NPP) 37-38 
Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-3, 
17-12, 17-17 
Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-39 
Deer Island Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME (NED) 1-50 
Deering, AK (NPA) 40-18 
Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage 
District, IL (LSM) 14-15 
DeGray Lake, AR (LMK) 12-18, 12-21 
DeKalb, IL (NCR) 23-14 
Delaware Bay to Millville, Millville fixed bridge to 
upper end of project (NAP) 3-27 
Delaware Coast Protection, DE (NAP) 3-12 
Delaware County (NAP) 3-30 
Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-4, 
17-12, 17-17 
Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, 
NJ (NAP) 3-3, 3-17, 3-22 
Delaware River, Mbuth of Neversink (NAP) 3-30 
Delaware River, PA, NJ and DE Philadelphia to the 
Sea (NAP) 3-4, 3-17, 3-23 
Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ (NAP) 3-27 
Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing (NAP) 
3-27 
Delaware River Vicinity of Camden, NJ (NAP) 3-4, 
3-18, 3-23 
Delphi, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 
Dennis Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-28 
Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Depoe Bay, OR (NPP) 37-7, 37-26, 37-34 
1-17

Depot Slough, OR (NPP) 37-42 
DeQueen Lake, AR (SWL) 28-6, 28-15, 28-30 
Derby, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-64 
Derby, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Deroin Bend, MO (MRO) 16-11, 16-18, 16-24, 16-40 
Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO 
(NCR) 23-11, 23-14 
Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 
Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA 
(NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-10 
Des Moines River, Wapello, IA (NCR) 23-15 
Des Plains River Wetlands Demonstration (NCC) 22-23 
Deschutes River, Bend, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge, near 
Tumwater, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East 
Olympia, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Detour Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 
Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR (NPP) 37-20, 37-29, 
37-37, 37-44 
Detroit River, MI (NCE) 21-8, 21-54, 21-77, 21-95 
Detroit River, Trenton Channel, MI (1968 R&H Act) 
(NCE) 21-97 
Detroit River, Trenton Channel, MI (1950 R&H Act) 
(NCE) 21-97 
Devils Lake, ND (NCS) 24-26 
Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORH) 17-4, 
17-13, 17-17 
Dice Grove, Lampasas River, Bell County, TX (SWF) 
30-23 
Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes, ME (NED) 1-58 
Dickinson Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Dierks Lake, AR (SWL) 28-6, 28-15, 28-30 
Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, 
WA (NPP) 37-39 
Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum 
County, OR (NPP) 37-39 
Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, 
WA (NPP) 37-39 
Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, 
Wahkiakum County, WA (NPP) 37-39 
Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 
Diking District 5, Catsop County, (NPP) 37-39 
Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, WA 
(NPP) 37-39 
Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA 
(NPP) 37-39 
Dillingham Emergency Bank Stabilization, AK (NPA) 
40-8, 40-13 
Dillingham Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-10, 40-15 
Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-4, 
17-13, 17-17 
Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) (ORP) 18-24 
Disaster Preparedness (MRK) 27-8 
Dismal Swamp Canal (Canal Creek), VA (NAO) 5-15 
Dismal Swamp Canal (South Mills), NC (NAO) 5-15 
Ditto Landing, Huntsville, AL (ORN) 15-18 
Dively Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-15 
Dixie Creek, GA (SAM) 10-57 
Dodge City, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 
Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (SAM) 10-10, 10-31, 10-40 
Doheny Beach State Park, CA (SPL) 33-36 
Domonakas Library, Sheffield, OH (NCB) 20-46 
Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (uncompleted 
portion) (NED) 1-58 
Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (NED) 1-50 
Dorena Lake, OR (NPP) 37-13, 37-28, 37-36, 37-44 
Double Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Double Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 
Douglas Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-10 
Dover, KY (ORH) 17-22 
Downyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 
16-33 
Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 
Drayton Hall, SC (SAN) 7-8, 7-13, 7-18 
Drinkwater Sewer, MO (LMM) 13-5 
Drum Inlet, NC (SAW) 6-4, 6-19 
Drury Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 
Dry Branch Creek, Grand Prairie, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Dry Creek (SPN) 34-14 
Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel 
Improvements, CA (SPK) 35-31, 35-43, 35-44 
Dry Creek, Goodlettsbille, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA (MRO) 26-21, 26-27 
Dry Creek, WA (NPW) 39-15 
Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, MO 
(MRK) 27-18 
Dry Jordan Creek, Harrison, AR (SWL) 28-6, 28-15 
Dry Pass, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-10 
Dry Run, IA (NCS) 24-26 
DuBois, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 
Dubuque Harbor, IA 25-7 
Dubuque, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 
Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-22 
I-18

Duck Creek, Elwood, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Duck Creek, Garland, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Duck Island Harbor, CT (NED) 1-50 
Duck Point Cove, MD (NAB) 4-35 
Duck River, TN (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 
Dudley Branch, Hebron Parkway, Carrollton, TX 
(SWF) 30-23 
Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI (NCE) 21-9, 
21-54, 21-78 
Duluth-Superior Inner Harbor, MN (1960 R&H Act) 
(NCE) 21-97 
Duncan Creek, Bloomer, WI (NCS) 24-32 
Dungeness River, Area #5, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Dungeness River, Area #8, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA (NPS) 
38-27 
Dunkirk Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-6, 20-21, 20-35 
Dunkirk Harbor, NY WRDA 1986 (NCB) 20-47 
Dunlap Creek, Redstone Township, PA 
(reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 
Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden (SAS) 8-22 
Duval County, FL (SAJ) 9-16, 9-33, 9-49 
Duxbury Harbor, MA (NED) 1-6, 1-33, 1-46 
Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (NPW) 39-6, 39-13, 
39-18, 39-24 
Dworshak Units 5 and 6, ID (NPW) 39-17 
Dyersburg, TN (LMM) 13-5 
Dymers Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
E 
Eagle, AK (NPA) 40-18 
Eagle Creek Lake, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 
Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH (ORP) 18-24 
Eagle Creek, SC (SAN) 7-21, 7-24 
Eagle Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95 
East Barre Dam, Winooski River, VT (NAN) 2-30 
East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX (SWG) 31-37 
East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, WA (NPS) 38-26 
East Boothbay Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 
East Bow Creek, Whynot, NE (MRO) 26-27, 26-31 
East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, 
(ORP) 18-7, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 
East Branch Dam, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-64 
East Brimfield Lake, MA (NED) 1-28, 1-42, 1-70 
East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage and 
Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-17 
East Chester Creek, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-27, 2-32 
East End Dauphin Island, FL (SAM) 10-18, 10-33 
East Fork of Boyer River, Near Vail, IA (MRO) 26-27 
East Fork, TX (SWF) 30-22 
East Fork White River, Brownstown (Jackson County), 
IN (ORL) 16-33 
East Gallatin, Near Bozeman, MT (MRO) 26-25 
East Hartford, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-63 
East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 
23-11, 23-14 
East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-5, 
17-13, 17-18 
East Moline, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 
East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR (NPP) 37-41 
East Muddy Creek, MO (MRK) 27-17 
East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA (MRO) 26-27 
East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold, IA (MRO) 
26-27 
East Nishnabotna River, Page Bny Brdg., IA (MRO) 
26-31 
East Nishnabotna River, Page County Bridge, Near 
Essex, IA (MRO) 26-27 
East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak, IA (MRO) 26-23 
East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into 
Choctawhatchee Bay, FL (SAM) 10-11, 10-31, 
10-40 
East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, (NCR) 23-12, 
23-14 
East Peoria, IL (NCR) 23-15 
East Peoria Sanitary District, IL (NCR) 23-14 
East Point, LA (LMK) 12-21 
East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO (SWL) 28-22 
East Rainelle, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
East River (NAN) 2-27, 2-29, 
East Rockaway Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-3, 2-16, 2-19, 
2-23, 2-28 
East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica 
Bay, NY (NAN) 2-10, 2-17, 2-28 
East Sidney Lake, NY (NAB) 4-19, 4-30 
East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (LSM) 14-4, 14-8, 
14-11 
East Weaver Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 
East Weaver Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 
Eastlake, Chagrin River, OH 1965 FC Act (NCB) 
20-47 
I-19

Eastpoint Channel, FL (SAM) 10-48 
Eastport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-58 
Eau Galle River, WI (NCS) 24-6, 24-21 
Eau Gallie Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-4, 9-29, 9-38 
Echo Bay Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27 
Ecosystem Restoration Work Under Special 
Authorization (LMM) 13-2, (LMK) 12-8, (LSM) 
14-6 
Edenton Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 
1-58 
Edgewater Park, OH 1954 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 
Edisto River, North Fork, SC (SAN) 7-21 
Edisto River, SC (SAN) 7-20, 7-21 
Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, SC (SAN) 
7-21 
Ediz Hook, WA (NPS) 38-2, 38-15, 38-21 
Edmonds Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Edward MacDowell Lake, NH (NED) 1-24, 1-40, 1-69 
Eel River at Sandy Prairie, CA (SPN) 34-14 
Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN (ORL) 16-33 
Eel River, CA (SPK) 35-41 
Egegik River, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Eight Mile Creek, Richland County, SC (SAN) 7-24 
Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham County, KY (ORL) 
16-33 
Eighteenmile Creek, Boston, NY (NCB) 20-46 
El Dorado Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-15, 29-23 
El Dorado, West Branch, Walnut River, KS (SWT) 
29-27 
El Paso, TX (SWA) 32-3, 32-12, 32-14 
El Turque Beach, Ponce, PR (SAJ) 9-52 
Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, IL 
(LSM) 14-11 
Eldred, IL (LSM) 14-17 
Eldred, PA (ORP) 18-29 
Elfin Cove, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Elizabeth, NJ (NAN) 2-30, 2-32 
Elizabethtown, IL (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD (NAB) 4-35 
Elk City Lake (Table Mound), KS (SWL) 28-28 
Elk City Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-15, 29-23, 29-27 
Elk Creek, Clyde, KS (MRK) 27-17 
Elk Creek Harbor, PA 1966 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 
Elk Creek, Jackson, NE (MRO) 26-27 
Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NPP) 37-13, 
37-28, 37-36 
Elk Creek, Nutter Fort, WV (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 
Elk Creek, Willis, NE (MRO) 26-27 
Elk River, AL and TN (ORN) 15-13 
Elk River, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31, 24-32 
Elk River, WV (ORH) 17-20 
Elkhorn River Bridge, Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-27 
Elkhorn River, Ewing, Holt County, NE (MRO) 
26-27, 26-31 
Elkhorn River, Ewing Sewage Lagoon, NE (MRO) 
26-31 
Elkhorn River, Logan Creek, NE (MRO) 26-30 
Elkhorn River, Near Beemer, NE (MRO) 26-27 
Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, Near Gretna, NE 
(MRO) 26-26 
Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, Near Norfolk, NE (MRO) 
26-26 
Elkins, WV (ORP) 18-4, 18-13, 18-18, 18-22 
Elkland, PA (NAB) 4-37 
Elkport, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 
Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Ellis Swamp, Gates County, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Elm Creek, Burt County, NE (MRO) 26-27 
Elm Creek, Decatur, NE (MRO) 26-26 
Elm Fork Floodway, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Elmira, NY (NAB) 4-19, 4-30 
Elochoman Slough, WA (NPP) 37-38 
Elvis Stahr Harbor, KY (LMM) 13-4 
Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA (NPS) 
38-27 
Elwha River, Clallam County, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Embarrass River, St. Marie, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Emergency Bank Protection (NAP) 3-13 
Emergency Bank Protection for Certain Highway and 
Railroad Facilities at Price Landing, MO (LSM) 
14-15 
Emergency Flood Control Activities 
Norfolk District (NAO) 5-11, 5-15 
Tulsa District (SWT) 29-11 
Emergency Protection for Illinois Approach, Chain of 
Rocks Bridge, IL (LSM) 14-15 
Emergency Repairs to Levees on Mississippi, Illinois, 
and Kaskaskia Rivers and Flood Fighting and 
Rescue Work (LSM) 14-15 
Emergency Response Activities (MRK) 27-9 
Emergency Shore Protection (NCE) 21-41 
I-20

Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under 
Special Authorization 
Charleston District (SAN) 7-10 
Galveston District (SWG) 31-16 
New York District (NAN) 2-15 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-8 
Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4) (SWL) 28-3, 
28-25 
Emmonak, AK (NPA) 40-18 
Emory River, Harriman, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Empire-Stratton, OH (ORP) 18-24 
Enderlin, Maple River, ND (NCS) 24-26 
Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY (NAB) 4-37, 
4-39 
Enforcement (SAJ) 9-27 
Engineer Topographic Laboratories 45-1 
England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 
16-28, 16-32 
English, IN (Little Blue River) (ORL) 16-23, 
Enid Diversion Channel, OK (SWT) 29-28 
Enid LPP, OK (SWT) 29-26 
Entiat River, Chelan County, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Entiat River, WA (NPS) 38-27, 38-30 
Environmental Data Studies (SWA) 32-11 
Environmental Review Guide for Operations (NCB) 20- 
13 
Environmental Service Partner (MRO) 26-28 
Environmental Work Under Special Authorization New 
Orleans District (LMN) 11-8 
Erie Harbor, PA (NCB) 20-6, 20-21, 20-36 
Erie Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 
Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 
Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 
Escambia Bay, FL (SAM) 10-54 
Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL (SAM) 10-49 
Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL (SAM) 10-18, 10-33, 10-45 
Esquatel Coulee, Mesa, WA (NWP) 39-15 
Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA (NPW) 39-15 
Essex River, MA (NED) 1-50,1-61 
Etna, PA (ORP) 18-29 
Eufaula Lake, OK, (SWL) 28-28 
Eufaula Lake, OK (SWT) 29-11, 29-20, 29-25, 29-27 
Evansdale, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 
Evanston, IL (NCC) 22-22 
Evansville, IN (ORL) 16-3, 16-14, 16-32 
Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (NPS) 38-2, 
38-14, 38-21, 38-30 
Everglades Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Exeter River, NH (NED) 1-50 
Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, 
LA to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, 
LA (LMK) 12-18 
F 
Fabius River Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-12, 
23-14 
Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK (NPA) 
40-16 
Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE (MRK) 27-17 
Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA (SPK) 35-9, 35-29 
Fairhaven Beach State Park, NY 1958 R&H Act (NCB) 
20-47 
Fairport Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-7, 20-21, 20-37 
Fajardo Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-51 
Falfurrias, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-21, 31-35 
Fall Brook Lake, PA (NAB) 4-39 
Fall Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-14, 37-28, 37-36, 
37-44 
Fall River Basin, SD (MRO) 26-4, 26-15, 26-21 
Fall River Harbor, MA (NED) 1-50 
Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 
1-58 
Fall River Lake, KS, (SWL) 28-28 
Fall River Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-16, 29-23, 29-27 
Falls Lake, NC (SAW) 6-12, 6-21 
Falmouth Harbor, MA (NED) 1-50 
Falmouth Lake, KY (Licking River) (ORL) 16-24, 
16-32 
Fancy Bluff Creek, GA (SAS) 8-21 
Far Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Farm Creek, IL (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-10 
Farmers Branch, White Settlement, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Farmers Drainage and Levee District (Sangamon 
River), IL (NCR) 23-13 
Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 
23-14 
Farmington River, Simsbury, CT (NED) 1-19, 1-38, 
1-50 
Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, 
AR (SWL) 28-22 
Fayette County, GA (SAM) 10-57 
I-21

Feather River, CA (SPK) 35-38 
Felsenthal, AR (LMK) 12-15 
Ferguson Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Fern Ridge Lake, Lake Marsh Renovation, OR (NPP) 
37-43 
Fern Ridge Lake, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-43 
Fern Ridge Lake, OR (NPP) 37-14, 37-28, 37-36, 
37-44 
Fernandina Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-4, 9-29, 9-38 
Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O'The Pines, TX (SWF) 
30-6, 30-15, 30-19 
Filberts Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY (NAN) 2-10, 
2-17, 2-21 
Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-4, 2-16, 2-19 
Fish River, Baldwin County, AL (SAM) 10-52 
Fisherman's Wharf Areas, San Francisco Harbor, CA 
(SPN) 34-7 
Fishing Bay, MD (NAB) 4-9, 4-44 
Fishing Creek, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-25, 4-33 
Fishing Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV (ORH) 17-24 
Fishpond Drain and Tributaries, GA (SAM) 10-57 
Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORH) 17-5, 
17-13, 17-18 
Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) (NED) 1-55 
Fivemile River Harbor, CT (NED) 1-50 
Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 
(NED) 1-58 
Flat Branch, Gulfport, MS (SAM) 10-49 
Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks LPP, Tulsa, OK 
(SWT) 29-26, 29-28 
Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT (NPS) 
38-27 
Flathead River, MT (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 
Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 
38-24 
Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT 
(NPS) 38-27 
Flatrock River, Rush County, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (ORL) 16-25, 
16-29 
Fletcher Creek at Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-3 
Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization 
(MRO) 26-9, 26-39 
Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-28 
Omaha District (MRO) 26-14 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 
St. Paul District (NCS) 24-20 
Flood Control Projects Under Construction B-1 
Flood Control Reservoirs Operable A-1 
Flood Control Reservoir Operations (NED) 1-30 
Flood Control Reservoirs Constructed or Contributed 
to by Corps of Engineers but Operated by Others 
A-1-A 
Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 
Alaska District (NPA) 40-8 
Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-10 
Baltimore District (NAB) 4-23 
Buffalo District (NCB) 20-16, 20-50, 20-51 
Charleston District (SAN) 7-10, 7-24 
Chicago District (NCC) 22-12 
Detroit District (NCE) 21-45 
Galveston District (SWG) 31-17 
Huntington District (ORH) 17-11 
Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-26 
Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-8 
Little Rock District (SWL) 28-7 
Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-12 
Louisville District (ORL) 16-13, 16-35 
Memphis District (LMM) 13-2 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-23, 10-51 
Nashville District (ORN) 15-6 
New England Division (NED) 1-30 
New Orleans District (LMN) 11-7 
New York District (NAN) 2-14 
Omaha District (MRO) 26-8 
Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-3 
Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-13 
Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12, 18-30 
Portland District (NPP) 37-15 
Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 
Sacramento District (SPK) 35-24 
San Francisco District (SPN) 34-6 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-8 
Seattle District (NPS) 38-9 
St. Louis District (LSM) 14-6 
Tulsa District (SWT) 29-11, 29-28 
Vicksburg District (LMK) 12-8 
Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-2 
I-22

Wilmington District (SAW) 6-15 
Flood Control Reservoir Operations 
New England Division (NED) 1-28 
Flood Damages Sustained and Prevented G-1 
Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Florence LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 
Flower and Parmenter Creeks, MT (NPS) 38-27 
Floyd County, GA (SAM) 10-57 
Floyd River, Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-21 
Flushing Bay and Creek, NY (NAN) 2-27 
Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL (SAM) 10-11, 10-32, 10-40, 
10-52 
Follansbee, WV (ORP) 18-24 
Folly Beach, SC (SAN) 7-7, 7-13, 7-18 
Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-63 
Folly River, SC (SAN) 7-4, 7-11, 7-16 
Folsom Lake, American River, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Forest Heights, MD (NAB) 4-37 
Forestville Harbor, MI (1968 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-97 
Forsyth, MT (MRO) 26-21, 26-25 
Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, 
and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 
4, IL (LSM) 14-17 
Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, 
IL (LSM) 14-15 
Fort Fisher and Vicinity, NC (SAW) 6-9 
Fort Gibson Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 
Fort Gibson Lake, OK (SWT) 29-12, 29-21, 29-25, 
29-27 
Fort Kent, ME (NED) 1-55 
Fort Leavenworth Bridge Removal (MRK) 27-16 
Fort Lupton, CO (Lagoon) (MRO) 26-25 
Fort Macon Park, NC (SAW) 6-29 
Fort Macon State Park, NC Remaining Work (SAW) 
6-31 
Fort Madison Harbor, IA 25-7 
Fort Myers Beach, FL (SAJM) 9-5, 9-29, 9-39 
Fort Niagara State Park, NY Sec. 201 1965 FC Act 
(NCB) 20-47 
Fort Peck Lake, MT (MRO) 26-11, 26-19, 26-24 
Fort Pierce Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-17, 9-33, 9-49 
Fort Pierce Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-5, 9-29, 9-39 
Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River 
Basin, SD (MRO) 26-12, 26-19, 26-25 
Fort Scott Lake Marmaton River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 
27-20 
Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Fort Supply Lake, OK (SWT) 29-5, 29-16, 29-23 
Fort Toulouse, Wetumpka, AL (SAM) 10-19, 10-34, 
10-46 
Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN (NCE) 21-42, 21-72, 
21-89 
Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX (SWF) 30-22 
Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX (SWF) 30-22 
Fortuna Bay, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-63 
Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Foster Creek, West Fork, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA (NAB) 4-22, 4-31 
Foster Lake, OR (NPP) 37-44 
Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO (SWA) 32-18 
Four River Basins, FL (SAJ) 9-24, 9-34, 9-51 
Four-Mile Creek, Cass County, NE (MRO) 26-31 
Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (SWL) 28-7, 
28-15 
Fourche Creek, Little Rock, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Fourmile Creek, Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-15 
Fourmile Run, VA (NAB) 4-37 
Fourpole Creek, WV (ORH) 17-24 
Fowl River, AL (SAM) 10-54 
Fox Point Barrier, RI (NED) 1-55 
Fox River, Bridge Site #7, Davis County, IA (NCR) 
23-16 
Fox River Locks and Dams (NCE) 21-100 
Fox River, Route J40 Bridge, Davis County, IA (NCR) 
23-16 
Fox River, WI (NCE) 21-10, 21-55, 21-78 
Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (NAP) 3-14, 3-21, 3-27 
Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS (MRK) 27-17 
Frankfort Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-11, 21-55, 21-78 
Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek)(Kentucky River) (ORL) 
16-24, 16-29 
Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort)(Kentucky River) 
(ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 
Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort)(Kentucky River) 
(ORL) 16-3, 16-14, 16-21 
Franklin Falls Dam, NH (NED) 1-25, 1-41, 1-69 
Frazer-Wolf Point, MT (MRO) 26-21 
Frazeysburg, OH (ORH) 17-23 
Frazier Creek, Beemer, NE (MRO) 26-30 
Freeport and Vicinity, Hurricane Flood Protection, TX 
(SWG) 31-37 
Freeport Harbor, TX (SWG) 31-4, 31-20, 31-28, 
31-41, 31-43, 31-48 
Freeport, IL (NCR) 23-13 
I-23

Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-24 
Fremont, OH, Sandusky River (NCB) 20-44 
French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN (ORN) 
15-13 
French Creek, Wattsburg, PA (planning and design 
analysis) (ORP) 18-30 
French Lake Township, MN (NCS) 24-32 
French River Restoration, MA (NED) 1-61 
Frenchboro Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 
Freshwater Bayou, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Friday Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-3, 38-14, 38-21 
Friendly, WV (ORH) 17-22 
Friendsville, MD (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 
From North Little Rock to Gillett (Above Plum Bayou), 
AR (SWL) 28-22 
Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK (SWT) 29-5, 29-16, 29-23 
Ft. Collins, CO (MRO) 26-28 
Fullerton, KY (ORH) 17-22 
Fulton County, GA (SAM) 10-57 
Fulton, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 
Furneaux Creek, Carrollton, TX (SWF) 30-23 
G 
Gadsden-Water Treatment Plant, Gadsden, AL (SAM) 
10-19, 10-33, 10-45 
Galax, VA (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
Galena, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 
Galile Salt Marsh, RI (NED) 1-61 
Galisteo Dam, NM (SWA) 32-5, 32-12, 32-15 
Gallatin River, Gallatin County, MT (MRO) 26-25, 
26-31 
Gallipolis, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (SWG) 31-5, 
31-20, 31-29, 31-41, 31-44, 31-48 
Ganargua Creek, Plasermill Road, NY (NCB) 20-46 
Gapway Swamp, NC and SC (SAW) 6-30 
Gapway Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-21 
Garapan Beach Road, CNMI (POD) 36-11 
Gardner, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-63 
Gardners Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Garland City, AR (LMK) 12-19, 12-21 
Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18, 
27-20 
Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, 
ND (MRO) 26-12, 26-19, 26-25 
Garvin Brook, Stockton, MN (NCS) 24-32 
Gasconade River, MO (MRK) 27-16 
Gastineau Channel, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Gate Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (NAO) 5-10, 
5-15, 5-19 
Gauley River, WV (ORH) 17-20 
Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri 
River Basin, NE and SD (MRO) 26-13, 26-19, 
26-25 
Gaysville Lake, VT (NED) 1-58 
Genegantslet Lake, NY (NAB) 4-39 
General Investigations (MRK) 27-9, (MRO) 26-14 
General Regulatory Functions (MRO) 26-14 
General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA (NAP) 
3-14, 3-21, 3-27 
Genesee River, Back River Road, Amity, NY (NCB) 
20-46 
Genesee River, Caneadea, NY (NCB) 20-46 
Geneva-on-the-Lake, OH (NCB) 20-42 
Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, NC (SAW) 6-30 
George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL & GA (SAM) 
10-5, 10-30 
Georges River, ME (NED) 1-50 
Georgetown Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-4, 7-11, 7-16 
Gering Valley, Gering Drain and Tributaries, NE 
(MRO) 26-26 
Gila and Salt Rivers Levee and Channel Improvements 
(SPL) 33-37 
Gila River Basin, AZ (SPL) 33-37 
Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE (MRO) 26-23 
Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 
16-23, 16-32 
Gillham Lake, AR (SWL) 28-7, 28-16, 28-30 
Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN (NCS) 24-7, 24-22 
Girty's Run, Millvale, PA (ORP) 18-22 
Glade Creek, Roanoke County and Vinton, VA (SAW) 
6-34 
Glasgow, MT (MRO) 26-21, 26-24 
Gleason Creek, NV (SPK) 35-41 
Glen Cove Creek, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-27 
Glen Cove Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-32 
Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA (NED) 
1-50 
Gloucester Harbor, MA (NED) 1-60 
Goat Island, GA & SC (SAS) 8-23 
Golconda, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 
Gold Creek, AK (NPA) 40-16 
I-24

Goldsboro, Neuse River, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Goleta; CA and Vicinity (SPL) 33-37 
Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw County, MS (SAM) 10-50 
Gooding Area, ID(NPW) 39-15 
Goodsby Creek, FL (SAJ) 9-63 
Goose Creek, MD (NAB) 4-35 
Gordon's Landing, VT (NAN) 2-27 
Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM) 10-50 
Goshen Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-28 
Governors Run, MD (NAB) 4-39 
Gowanas Creek Channel, NY (NAN) 2-27 
Grafton, ND (NCS) 24-28, 24-31 
Grafton Pumping Station, ND (NCS) 24-26 
Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL (LSM) 14-17 
Grahn, KY (ORH) 17-24 
Grand Bayou Pass, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Grand Forks (NCS) 24-32 
Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, MI (NCE) 
21-12, 21-55, 21-79, 21-93 
Grand Haven Harbor, MI (1945 R&H Act) (NCE) 
21-97 
Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (LMN) 11-4, 11-9, 11-12 
Grand Lake O' the Cherokees (SWT) 29-27 
Grand Marais Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-13, 21-56, 21-79, 
21-91 
Grand Marais Harbor, MN (NCE) 21-13, 21-59, 21-83 
Grand Marais, MI (NCE) 21-95 
Grand Mound-State Historic Site, MN (NCS) 24-31, 
24-30 
Grand Prairie (Landfill), TX (SWF) 30-22 
Grand Prairie (Meyers Road), TX (SWF) 30-22 
Grand Rapids, WI (NCS) 24-32 
Grand River at Grandville, MI (1965 Flood Control 
Act) (NCE) 21-97 
Grand Ronde Valley, OR (NPW) 39-17 
Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 
14-15 
Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21F13, 21-56, 
21-79 
Grande Ronde Lake, OR (NPW) 39-17 
Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act (NCB) 
20-47 
Grandview, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Grant Parish, Below Colfax, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 
Granville, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 
Grapevine Lake, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-16, 30-19 
Grasse River (Massena), NY (NCB) 20-42 
Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IL (Muscatatuck River) 
(ORL) 16-23, 16-33 
Graves Creek, ID (NPW) 39-15 
Gravesend Bay, NY (NAN) 2-28 
Grays Creek Canal, Shelby County, TN (LMM) 13-5 
Grays Harbor and Chehalis River (Uncompleted 
portion), WA (1968 R&H ACT) (NPS) 38-30 
Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (NPS) 38-3, 
38-15, 38-21, 38-30 
Grays Harbor, Point Chehalis, WA (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 
38-22 
Grays Reef Passage, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 
Grays River, WA (NPP) 37-38 
Grayson Lake, KY (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 
Grayville, IL (ORL) 16-24 
Great Bend, KS (SWT) 29-6, 29-16, 29-23 
Great Chazy River, NY (NAN) 2-27 
Great Coharie Creek, NC (SAW) 6-34 
Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ (NAP) 
3-12, 3-27 
Great Falls, MT (MRO) 26-21 
Great Kills Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27 
Great Lakes Connecting Channels, MI (R&H Acts of 
1946 and 1956) (NCE) 21-97 
Great Lakes to Hudson River W/W, NY (NAN) 2-27 
Great Miami River, Brookville Lake, IN (ORL) 16-32 
Great Miami River, Port Jefferson, OH (ORL) 16-33 
Great Miami River, Sidney, OH (ORL) 16-31, 16-33 
Great Pee Dee River, SC (SAN) 7-20 
Great Salt Plains Lake, OK (SWT) 29-6, 29-16, 29-23 
Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (uncompleted 
portion) (NED) 1-58 
Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (NED) 1-50 
Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1941 R&H Act (NCB) 
20-47 
Great Sodus Bay, NY (NCB) 20-42 
Great South Bay, NY (NAN) 2-27 
Green and Barren Rivers, KY (ORL) 16-2, 16-14, 
16-19, 16-27 
Green Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-13, 21-57, 21-79 
Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 
(NCR) 23-8, 23-10, 23-14 
Green Bayou Bridges (SWG) 31-5, 31-19, 31-28 
Green Brook (Regional Center), NJ (NAN) 2-36 
Green Harbor, MA (NED) 1-6, 1-33, 1-46 
Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA (NCR) 
23-13 
I-25

Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR (NPP) 37-20, 37-29, 
37-37, 37-44 
Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and 
Allentown, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Green River, Calhoun, KY (ORL) 16-31, 16-34, 16-35 
Green River Lake, KY (ORL) 16-8, 16-16, 16-31 
Green River, State Highway 181, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Green Swamp, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-24 
Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Greene County, AL (SAM) 10-57 
Greene, NY (NAB) 4-38, 4-44 
Greenfield Bayou, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24 
Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 
16-29 
Greenport Harbor (NAN) 2-27 
Greens Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 
Greens Creek, Petal, MS (SAM) 10-49 
Greentree Subdivision, Midland, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Greenup, KY (ORH) 17-22 
Greenvale Creek, VA (NAO) 5-4, 5-21 
Greenville, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Greenwich Bay, RI (NED) 1-50 
Greenwich Cove, Greenwich, CT (NED) 1-60 
Greenwich Harbor, CT (NED) 1-50 
Greenwich Point Beach, CT (NED) 1-58 
Greers Ferry Lake, AR (SWL) 28-11, 28-17, 28-31 
Gregory Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 
Greilickville Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-14, 21-57, 21-80 
Greybull, WY (MRO) 26-25, 26-20 
Griffithville-Yawkey, WV (ORH) 17-24 
Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 
Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), TX (SWG) 
31-40 
Guadalupe River, CA (SPK) 35-10, 35-29 
Guadalupe River at Victoria, TX (SWG) 31-14, 31-22 
Guayanes Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-51 
Guilford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-6, 1-33, 1-46, 1-71 
Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT 
(NED) 1-54 
Gulf Beach, Milford, CT (NED) 1-54 
Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa County, FL (SAM) 10-50 
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, 
FL & Mexican Border (SAM) 10-11, 10-33, 
10-41 (LMN) 11-13 (SWG) 31-5, 31-21, 31-30, 
31-41 
Gulf Street, Milford, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-63 
Gulfport Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-12, 10-32, 10-41 
Guttenberg, IA (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
Guyandotte River, WV (ORH) 17-20 
Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS (MRK) 27-17 
H 
Haaula Highway, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-11 
Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, MO (MRK) 
27-18 
Haikey Creek, OK (SWT) 29-28 
Haines Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 
Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 
Halfway Branch, Spartenburg, SC (SAN) 7-24 
Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-64 
Halls Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 
Halstad, MN (NCS) 24-29 
Halstead, KS (SWT) 29-6, 29-16, 29-23 
Hamlet City Lake, NC (SAW) 6-11, 6-21 
Hamlin Beach Harbor, NY 1968 R&H Act (NCB) 
20-47 
Hamlin Beach State Park, NY (NCB) 20-43 
Hammersley Inlet (Uncompleted Portion), WA (NPS) 
38-30 
Hammersley Inlet, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT (NED) 1-54 
Hammond Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-15, 21-57, 21-80 
Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 FC 
Act (NCB) 20-47 
SHampton Beach, Hampton, NH (NED) 1-54 
Hampton Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Hampton Harbor, NH (NED) 1-7, 1-33, 1-46 
Hampton Institute, VA (NAO) 5-17 
Hampton Roads and Elizabeth River (NAO) 5-13 
Hampton Roads and Elizabeth River (NAO) 5-12 
Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) 
(NAO) 5-4, 5-13, 5-16 
Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-9 
Hanahan Water Treatment Plan, Charleston County, 
SC (SAN) 7-24 
Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-9 
Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-9 
Hanapepe River, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-9 
Hancock Brook Lake, CT (NED) 1-22, 1-40 
Hancock County, Seawall, MS (SAM) 10-19, 10-45 
Hanging Rock, OH (ORH) 17-22 
1-26

Hannibal Harbor, MO 25-8 
Hannibal, MO (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 
Hannibal SBH, MO (NCR) 23-11 
Hanover, Hennepin County, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
Hansen Dam, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-17, 33-29 
Harbor Beach Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-15, 21-57, 21-80 
Harbor of Refuge (NAP) 3-27 
Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (Uncompleted 
Portion) (NED) 1-58 
Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (NED) 1-7, 1-34, 
1-46 
Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (NED) 
Harbor of Refuge, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Harbor Office at Morrow Bay, CA SPL) 33-35 
Harbors of Washington Island, WI (R&H Act of 1937) 
(NCE) 21-97 
Harkers Island, Carteret County, NC (SAW) 6-32 
Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE (MRK) 
27-3, 27-11, 27-14, 27-22 
Harlem River, NY (NAN) 2-27 
Harpers Ferry, WV (NAB) 4-39 
Harraseeket River, ME (NED) 1-50 
Harrisburg, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 
Harrison County, MS Shore Protection (SAM) 10-49 
Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, IL (LSM) 
14-15 
Harrisville Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-15, 21-58, 21-80 
Harrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) (ORL) 16-33 
Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO 
(Downstream Fish and Wildlife Mitigation) 
(MRK) 27-17 
Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, 
MO (MRK) 27-7 27-13, 27-17 
Hartford, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-63 
Hartford, White River, VT (NED) 1-55, 1-63 
Hartford, WV (ORH) 17-22 
Hartwell Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-11 
Hartwell Lake, GA and SC (SAS) 8-10, 8-14, 8-21, 
8-24 
Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA (LMN) 
11-15 
Hastings Harbor, MN 25-7 
Hatchie River, Alcorn County, MS (LMM) 13-5 
Haverhill, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-65 
Havre, MT (MRO) 26-21, 26-24 
Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam (MRO) 26-24 
Hawesville, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 
Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY (NED) 1-50 
Hay Creek, Belle Fource, SD (MRO) 26-25 
Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA (NAP) 3-29 
Hays, Big Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 
Haysi, VA (ORH) 17-21 
Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA (NED) 1-55 
Hazard, KY (ORL) 16-20, 16-24 
Heart River, Morton County, Mandan, SD (MRO) 
26-31 
Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 
Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID (NPW) 39-15 
Heise-Roberts Extension, ID (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 
Helena Harbor, AR (LMM) 13-4 
Hellens Creek, MD (NAB) 4-40 
Helm Lake, IL (ORL) 16-26, 16-33 
Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR (LMK) 
12-20, 12-21 
Hempstead Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-32 
Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL (NCR) 
23-12 
Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL (NCR) 
23-12, 23-14 
Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL (NCR) 
23-12, 23-14 
Henderson Creek, Warren County, IL (NCR) 23-16 
Henderson Harbor Cut, NY (NCB) 20-44 
Henderson River, IL (NCR) 23-13 
Henderson, WV (ORH) 17-22 
Hendrick's Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 
Hennepin County, County Highway 116, MN (NCS) 
24-32 
Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 
23-12, 23-14 
Henrys Fork Unit (NPW) 39-17 
Hereford Inlet (NAP) 3-30 
Herget Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-14 
Herkimer, NY (NAN) 2-30 
Herreid, Spring Creek, SD (MRO) 26-21, 26-25 
Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, MD (NAB) 4-5, 
4-25, 4-33 
Herring Creek, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-25, 4-33 
Hesperia, CA (SPL) 33-31 
Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK (SWT) 29-6, 
29-16, 29-23 
Hickman Run, Little Tyrone Township, PA 
(terminated) (ORP) 18-30 
I-27

Hickman Wash, Ft. Defiance, AZ (SPL) 33-31 
Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (SPK) 
35-11, 35-29 
Hidden Lake Restoration, NE (MRO) 26-11, 26-18, 
26-24, 26-40 
Higginsport, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Highland Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Highway 12, CO (SWA) 32-18 
Highway 23/14, Jackson County, MN (NCC) 23-16 
Highway 23/8, Jackson County, MN (NCC) 23-16 
Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, FL (SAM) 10-50 
Hills Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-21, 37-30, 37-37, 
37-44 
Hills Creek, Warren County, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Hills Point Road, Dorchester County, MD (NAB) 4-38 
Hillsboro Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Hillsborough Bay, FL (SAJ) 9-52 
Hillsborough River, FL (SAJ) 9-44 
Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS (MRK) 27-3, 
27-11, 27-15, 27-22 
Hillside Drainage, Myrtle Beach, SC (SAN) 7-24 
Hillview Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-11 
Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 
Hingham Harbor, MA (NED) 1-50 
Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry County, MS (SAM) 
10-50 
Hiwassee River, Polk and Bradley Counties, TN 
(ORN) 15-14 
Hockingport, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA (SPL) 
33-40 
Hodges Village Dam, MA (NED) 1-28, 1-42, 1-70 
Hoh River, County Road 216, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Hoh River, near Forks, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Hokah, MN (NCS) 24-29 
Hoko River, Sekiu, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Holbrook, AZ (SPL) 33-7, 33-17, 33-29 
Holes Creek, West Carrollton, Ohio (Great Miami 
River) (ORL) 16-24 
Holland Harbor Entrance Channel, MI (1954 R&H 
Act) (NCE) 21-97 
Holland Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-15, 21-58, 21-80 
Holland Patent, NY - Thompson Creek (NAN) 2-16 
Holley Lake, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Holly, CO (SWA) 32-18 
Hollywood-Ardmore Beach, Chicago, IL (NCC) 22-22 
Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME (NED) 1-55 
Holmes Creek, FL (SAM) 10-49 
Holston River, TN (ORN) 15-13 
Holyoke, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-63 
Homasassa River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Homer Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-10, 40-15, 40-17 
Homer Spit Erosion, AK (NPA) 40-8, 40-14, 40-16 
Hominy Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-31, 6-34 
Homme Lake and Dam, ND (NCS) 24-7, 24-22 
Homochitto River, MS (LMK) 12-16, 12-21 
Honey Creek Levee, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Honey Hill Lake, NH (NED) 1-58 
Honga River and Tar Bay, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-25, 4-34 
Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 
36-7 
Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 
Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Hoonah Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 
Hooper, Elkhorn River, NE (MRO) 26-26 
Hooper, NE (MRO) 26-21 
Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, NY (NAN) 2-30 
Hop Brook Lake, CT (NED) 1-23, 1-40 
Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH (NED) 1-25, 1-41, 1-69 
Hoquiam, Aberdeen, and Cosmopolis, Chehalis River, 
WA (NPS) 38-30 
Hoquiam River, WA (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 
Hords Creek Lake, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-16, 30-19 
Horn Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Hornell, NY (NAB) 4-19, 4-30 
Horseshoe Bend, WA (NPS) 38-31 
Horseshoe Cove, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 
Hoskins Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Hot Springs, Fall River Channel, SD (MRO) 26-25 
Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties, MS 
(SAM) 10-50 
Houma Navigation Canal, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA (NED) 1-20, 1-58 
Housatonic River, CT (NED) 1-50, 1-61 
Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 
1-58 
Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA (NED) 1-55 
Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT (NED) 1-55 
Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA (NED) 1-22 
Houston County, AL (SAM) 10-57 
Houston, MN (NCS) 24-8, 24-22 
I-28

Houston School Road Bridge, Itawamba County, MS 
(SAM) 10-50 
Houston Ship Channel, TX (SWG) 31-7, 31-21, 31-33, 
31-41, 31-44, 31-49 
Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 
38-24 
Howards Mill Lake, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Hudson Harbor, WI (NCS) 24-28 
Hudson River Channel, NY & N.J. (NAN) 2-5, 2-16, 
2-21, 2-26 
Hudson River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Hudson River, NY (NAN) 2-4, 2-16, 2-19 
Hudson River, NYC to Albany (NAN) 2-32 
Hugo Lake, OK (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-24 
Hulah Lake, OK (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-24 
Hull Branch, MS (SAM) 10-57 
Humarock Beach, Scituate, MA (NED) 1-60 
Humboldt Bay (Buhne Point), CA (SPN) 34-13 
Humboldt Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-3, 40-9, 40-12 
Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA (SPN) 34-7 
Humboldt River and Tributaries, NV (SPK) 35-41 
Humboldt, TN (LMM) 13-5 
Humbug Creek, Pilger, NE (MRO) 26-30 
Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage 
District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 
Hunting Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 
Hunting Island Beach, SC (SAN) 7-20 
Huntingdon, TN (LMM) 13-6 
Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA (NPP) 37-39 
Huntington Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27, 2-32 
Huntington Lake, IN (ORL) 16-8, 16-16 
Huntington, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-63 
Huntington, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
Huot, MN (NCS) 24-29 
Huron Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-7, 20-22, 20-38 
Hurricane Barrier Operations 
New England Division (NED) 1-30 
Hurricane Creek, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-50 
Hutchins, KY (ORH) 17-24 
Hutchinson LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 
Hutto Creek, Austin, IN (ORL) 16-38 
Hutton Bridge, Reach H. Stream, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Hyannis Harbor, MA (NED) 1-51, 1-60 
Hydaburg, AK (NPA) 40-17 
Hyde County Dike, NC (SAW) 6-31' 
I 
1-38 Lake, MO (LSM) 14-17 
lao Stream, Maui, HI (POD) 36-9 
Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA (NAP) 3-28 
Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE (NAP) 3-28 
Ice Harbor Lock and Dam - Lake Sacajawea, WA 
(NPW) 39-7, 39-13, 39-18, 39-24, 39-28 
Ida Grove, IA (MRO) 26-21 
Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek, IA (MRO) 
26-27 
Iliuliuk Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Illinois and Mississippi Canal, (NCR) IL 23-2, 23-7 
Illinois Beach State Park, IL (NCC) 22-7, 22-16, 22-20 
Illinois River, Liverpool, IL (NCR) 23-15 
Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Chicago, IL (NCC) 
22-23 
Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Kenilworth, IL (NCC) 
22-22 
Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Winnetka, IL (NCC) 
22-23 
Illinois Waterway Existing Locks and Dams (NCR) 
23-17 
Illinois Waterway, IL (LSM) 14-2 
Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Additional Features 
(NCR) 23-18, 23-19 
Illinois Waterway, IL and IN (NCR) 23-2, 23-7, 23-8, 
23-13 
Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks (NCR) 
23-13 
Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Lock and Dam 
Construction (NCR) 23-17, 23-18 
Illinois Waterway, Marseilles Canal, IL (NCR) 23-14 
Illinois Waterway, Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) 
(NCR) 23-13 
Imperial Beach, CA (SPL) 33-36 
Inarajan Shoreline, Guam (POD) 36-11 
Indian Bend Wash (SPL) 33-37 
Indian Creek Area, Illinois River, IL (LSM) 14-17 
Indian Creek at Emerson, IA (MRO) 26-21, 26-27 
Indian Creek, Burton Road, Morgan County, IN (ORL) 
16-34 
Indian Creek, Corydon, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 
Indian Creek, Fort Worth, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Indian Creek, Hastings, IA (MRO) 26-25 
Indian Creek Lake, IA (MRO) 26-23 
Indian Grave Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 
Indian Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-18 
Indian River County, FL (SAJ) 9-17, 9-33, 9-49 
I-29

Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (NAP) 3-5, 3-18, 3-24 
Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Bank Protection, 
Beverly Shores, IN (NCC) 22-8, 22-16, 22-21 
Indiana Harbor, IN (NCC) 22-5, 22-15, 22-19, 22-22 
Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN (NCC) 22-8, 22-16, 
22-21 
Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section)(White River) 
(ORL) 16-23 
Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section)(White River) 
(ORL) 16-24 
Indianola, NE (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 
Industry, PA (ORP) 18-24 
Inex, KY (ORH) 17-24 
Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware 
Bay (NAP) 3-27 
Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake 
Bay, DE, MD, (NAP) 3-5, 3-18, 3-24 
Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, 
LA (LMN) 11-13 
Inland Waterway Rehoboth to Delaware Bay, DE 
(NAP) 3-6, 3-18, 3-24 
Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control 
Projects (NED) 1-16 
Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 
Alaska District (NPA) 40-8 
Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-9 
Baltimore District (NAB) 4-23 
Buffalo District (NCB) 20-16 
Charleston District (SAN) 7-10, 7-24 
Detroit District (NCE) 21-45 
Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-11, 30-23 
Galveston District (SWG) 31-16 
Huntington District (ORH) 17-11 
Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-25 
Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-7 
Little Rock District (SWL) 28-7 
Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-11, 33-43 
Louisville District (ORL) 16-12, 16-32, 16-33, 
16-34 
Memphis District (LMM) 13-2 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-23 
Nashville District (ORN) 15-5 
New England Division (NED) 1-29 
New Orleans District (LMN) 11-7 
New York District (NAN) 2-14 
Omaha District (MRO) 26-9 
Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-14 
Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12, 18-29 
Portland District (NPP) 37-15 
Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 
Sacramento District (SPK) 35-23 
San Francisco District (SPN) 34-6 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-8, 8-14 
Seattle District (NPS) 38-9 
St. Louis District (LSM) 14-6 
St. Paul District (NCS) 24-20, 24-32 
Tulsa District (SWT) 29-11, 29-28 
Vicksburg District (LMK) 12-8 
Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-3 
Wilmington District (SAW) 6-15 
Completed PL-99 Works (NPW) 39-2 
Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River, IA (MRO) 26-27 
International Boundary Waters Board 48-1 
Interstate 59 Bridges, Foster, AL (SAM) 10-50 
Interstate Bridge, Colubmia River, Portland, OR to 
Vancouver, WA (Alteration) (NPP) 37-38 
Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), OR (NPP) 
37-38 
Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to 
Anclote River, FL (SAJ) 9-6, 9-28, 9-37 
Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to 
Bayou Teche, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL 
(SAJ) 9-6, 9-29, 9-39 
Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, FL (SAJ) 
9-51 
Investigation of Projects Under Federal Power Act 49-1 
lola LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 
Iowa River, Chelsea, IA (NCR) 23-16 
Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA 
(NCR) 23-12, 23-15 
Ipswich River, MA (NED) 1-51 
Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 
Irondale Lake, MO (LSM) 14-17 
Irondequoit Bay, NY (NCB) 20-8, 20-22, 20-38 
Ironton, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
Irving Township at Nichols Road, Jackson County, WI 
(NCS) 24-26 
Irving Township, Jackson County, WI (NCS) 24-26, 
24-31 
Irvington Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-32 
Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (SPK) 35-11, 35-29 
Island Avenue, Quincy, MA (NED) 1-55 
Island Creek, MD (NAB) 4-6, 4-26, 4-34 
I-30

Island End River, Chelsea, MA (NED) 1-51 
Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-29 
Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME (NED) 1-51 
Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH (NED) 1-51 
Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD (NAB) 4-38 
Islesboro (The Narrows), ME (NED) 1-55 
Isreal River, Lancaster, NH (NED) 1-63 
Ithaca, Cayuga Inlet, NY (NCB) 20-44 
Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act (NCB) 
20-47 
Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek 1941 FC Act (NCB) 20-47 
J 
J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, 
TN (ORN) 15-6, 15-9, 15-17 
J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC 
(Formerly Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC) (SAS) 
8-9, 8-14, 8-21, 8-24 
Jack's Defeat Creek, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Jackman Creek, Skagit River, WA (NPS) 38-27 
Jackson Brand, Dallas, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Jackson County Levee District No. 2, White River, AR 
(SWL) 28-22 
Jackson Creek, Richland County, SC (SAN) 7-21 
Jackson Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY (NPW) 39-15 
Jackson Hole, WY (NPW) 39-3, 39-13 
Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 
16-33 
Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL (SAM) 10-9, 
10-31, 10-39 
Jackson Township, Butler County, PA (initial 
appraisal) (ORP) 18-30 
Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, WV (ORH) 17-24 
Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), FL (SAJ) 9-7, 9-30, 
9-40 
Jacksonville Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-6, 9-30, 9-40 
Jamaica Bay, NY (NAN) 2-5, 2-16, 2-21 
James Hose Ditch, Linden, IN (ORL) 16-35 
James R. Olin Flood Control Project (NAO) 5-10, 
5-15, 5-15, 5-19 
James River Environmental, SD (MRO) 26-28 
James River Sewage Lagoon, Brown County, NE 
(MRO) 26-31 
James River, VA (NAO) 5-4, 5-13, 5-24 
James River, Yankton, SD (MRO) 26-26 
James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) (SWL) 
28-3, 28-27 
Jamestown Reservoir, ND (MRO) 26-21 
Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI (NCR) 23-13 
Jarvis Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Jasper County, IL (ORL) 16-35 
Jefferson County, AL (SAM) 10-57 
Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 
16-32 
Jeffries Creek, Darlington County, SC (SAN) 7-24 
Jemez Canyon Dam, NM (SWA) 32-6, 32-12, 32-15 
Jenks LPP, OK (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 
Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT (NED) 1-54 
Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV (NAB) 4-14, 
4-28, 4-37 
Jeremy Creek, SC (SAN) 7-5, 7-12, 7-17 
Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, FL & GA (SAM) 10-25, 
10-35, 10-47 
Joe Creek LPP, OK (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 
Joe Hardin Lock and Dam (No. 3), AR (SWL) 28-3, 
28-25 
Joe Pool Lake, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-16, 30-19 
John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA 
(NPP) 37-21, 37-30, 37-37, 37-45 
John Day River (West), OR (NPP) 37-40 
John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 
37-39 
John Day River, OR (NPP) 37-41 
John Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-41 
John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, VA and NC (SAW) 
6-16, 6-22 
John Martin Reservoir, CO (SWA) 32-4, 32-12 
John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS (SWT) 29-7, 
29-17, 29-24 
John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River 
Basin, VA (ORH) 17-6, 17-13, 17-18 
John's Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-30, 9-40 
Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME (NED) 1-55 
Johnson Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Johnson Creek, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Johnsonburg, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 
Johnstown, PA (ORP) 18-5, 18-13, 18-18, 18-22 
Jones Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-6, 2-16, 2-21 
Jonesport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-51 
Jonesville, LA (LMK) 12-15 
Josias River, ME (NED) 1-8, 1-34, 1-46 
1-31

Joyce Creek, Camden County, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Julian, Rock Creek, NE (MRO) 26-26 
Juneau Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 
K 
Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 
Kaaawa Highway, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-11 
Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 
Kahoma Stream, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 
Kahului Beach Road, Maui, HI (POD) 36-7 
Kahului Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-7 
Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 
Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-9 
Kake Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, 
WA (NPP) 37-41 
Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA (NPP) 37-38 
Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek), MI (NCE) 21-96 
Kalamazoo River, Battle Creek, MI (1954 Flood 
Control Act) (NCE) 21-97 
Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo, MI (1958 Flood Control 
Act) (NCE) 21-97 
Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-7 
Kanawha River, WV (ORH) 17-2, 17-12, 17-17 
Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 
Kankakee River Ice Management, IL (NCC) 22-9, 
22-16 
Kankakee River, IL and IN Levee Between Shelby 
Bridge and Baum's Bridge, IN (NCC) 22-23 
Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS (MRK) 27-4, 
27-12, 27-15, 27-22 
Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod.) (MRK) 
27-17 
Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS 
(MRK) 27-17 
Kansas River and Minor Tributaries (MRK) 27-20 
Kansas River Navigation (MRK) 27-18 
Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Molokai, HI 
(POD) 36-10 
Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 
Kasilof Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL 
(LSM) 14-4, 14-8, 14-11, 14-15 
Kaskaskia River, IL (LSM) 14-10, 14-15 
Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 
Kaunakakai Deep Draft Harbor, Molokai, HI (POD) 
36-10 
Kaunakakai Small Draft Harbor, Molokai, HI (POD) 
36-10 
Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-9 
Kaw Lake, OK (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-24 
Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 
Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-1, 
36-5, 36-6 
Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-2, 36-5 
Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 
Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and 
Success Lake, CA (SPK) 35-13, 35-30 
Kawkawlin River, MI (NCE) 21-96 
Kays Creek, UT (SPK) 35-39 
Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-17 
Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 
Keene, NH (NED) 1-55, 1-63 
Keg Creek, Minden, IA (MRO) 26-27 
Kehoe Lake, KY (ORH) 17-21 
Keithsburg Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-14 
Kekaha Beach, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-8 
Kelleys Island, OH (NCB) 20-42 
Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID (NPW) 39-18 
Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA (NPS) 38-31 
Kennebec River, ME (NED) 1-51, 1-61 
Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 
1-58 
Kennebunk River, ME (NED) 1-51 
Kenosha Harbor, WI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-97 
Kenosha Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-17, 21-59, 21-80 
Kentucky River, Frankfort, KY (ORL) 16-35 
Kentucky River, KY (ORL) 16-2, 16-14, 16-27, 16-31 
Kentucky River, National Recreation Area (ORL) 
16-24 
Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, CA (SPK) 
35-39 
Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 
23-15 
Ketchikan, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 
Ketchikan - Bar Point Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-3, 40-11, 
40-19 
Ketchikan Harbor (West Breakwater), AK (NPA) 40-16 
Keuka Lake, NY (NCB) 20-21, 20-40 
Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-10 
Kewaunee River, WI (1960 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-97 
Kewaunee Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-17, 21-59, 21-80 
I-32

Keweenaw Waterway, MI (NCE) 21-18, 21-60, 21-81 
Key West Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Keyport Harbor (NAN) 2-26, 2-27 
Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Keystone Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 
Keystone Lake, OK (SWT) 29-12, 29-21, 29-25, 29-27 
Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
Kihei Beach, Maui, HI (POD) 36-8 
Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 
Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & NY (NAN) 2-5, 
2-16, 2-20 
Kindred Lake, ND (NCS) 24-28 
King (Water Plant), NC (SAW) 6-11, 6-21 
King Cove Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-17 
Kings Creek, MS (SAM) 10-52 
Kings Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Kingston-Edwardsville, PA (NAB) 4-38 
Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA (NED) 1-51 
Kingston Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Kingston, NY (NAN) 2-16 
Kingston Township, MN (NCS) 24-32 
Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, SC (SAN) 
7-21, 7-24 
Kinley Creek, Lexington County, SC (SAN) 7-24 
Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River 
Basin, PA and NY, (ORP) 18-7, 18-14, 18-19, 
18-28 
Kiowa Tribe Housing Development, Andarko, OK 
(SWT) 29-29 
Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL (NCR) 23-12 
Kishwaukee River, Belvidere, IL (NCC) 23-16 
Kissimmee River Restoration, FL (SAJ) 9-27, 9-52 
Kittanning, PA Part I (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 
Kittanning, PA Part. II (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-24 
Kitzmiller, MD (NAB) 4-38 
Klamath River, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Klamath River, CA (SPN) 34-14 
Klawock, AK (NPA) 40-17 
Klutina River, Cooper Center, AK (NPA) 40-16 
Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 
Knapps Narrows, MD (NAB) 4-6, 4-26, 4-34 
Knife River Harbor, MN (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 
Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA (SPN) 34-13 
Knightville Dam, MA (NED) 1-19, 1-38 
Knobb's Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Kodiak Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-3, 40-11, 40-15, 40-17 
Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID (NPS) 38-28 
Kootenai River, ID and MT (NPS) 38-26 
Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID 
(NPS) 38-28 
Koyuk, AK (NPA) 40-17 
Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 
Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 
L 
La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA (NPS) 38-9, 
38-17, 38-24 
La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA (NPS) 38-28 
La Crosse, WI (NCS) 24-28, 24-32 
La Farge Lake and Channel Improvemnet, WI (NCS) 
24-9, 24-22 
La Trappe, MD (NAB) 4-35 
Lac La Belle Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-19, 21-60, 21-81 
Lac qui Parle Lakes, Minnesota River, MN (NCS) 
24-9, 24-22 
Lac qui Parle, MN (NCS) 24-30 
Lacakawanna, NY, Smokes Creek (NCB) 20-44 
Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 
Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley 
Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12 
Lackawanna River Basin, PA (NAB) 4-14, 4-37 
Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24 
Lago de Portuges, PR (SAJ) 9-50 
Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA (NED) 1-51 
LaGrange Bayou, FL (SAM) 10-49, 10-54 
Laguna Madre Seagrass Restoration, TX (SWG) 31-16, 
31-21 
Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-10 
Lake Andursia, Mississippi River, MN (NCS) 24-26, 
24-31 
Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, 
ND (NCS) 24-10, 24-22 
Lake Brownwood Modification, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Lake Camanchie, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Lake Cavanaugh, WA (NPS) 38-31 
Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Lake Charles, LA (LMN) 11-10 
Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY (ORP) 
18-24 
Lake City Harbor, MN 25-7 
Lake Creek, Round Rock, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Lake Crockett, WA (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 38-22 
I-33

Lake Darling Dam, ND (NCS) 24-26 
Lake Douglas, Decatur, GA (SAM) 10-50 
Lake Elsinore, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-17, 33-29 
Lake Erie, Cooley Canal, Lucas, OH (NCB) 20-45 
Lake Erie, Fredonia, NY (NCB) 20-46 
Lake Erie, Geneva Park, OH (NCB) 20-46 
Lake Erie, Hamburg, NY (NCB) 20-46 
Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, OH and PA - 1935 Act (ORP) 
18-24 
Lake Erie Sturgeon Point, NY (NCB) 20-20 
Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Lake George, Hobart, IN (NCC) 22-9, 22-16, 22-21 
Lake Guntersville, AL (ORN) 15-18 
Lake Herman (Dredging), SD (MRO) 26-23 
Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) (SWT) 29-27 
Lake Kemp, TX (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-24 
Lake Michigan Diversion (NCC) 22-5, 22-15, 22-19 
Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, 
Chicago, IL (NCC) 22-22 
Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL (NCC) 22-22 
Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL (NCC) 22-22 
Lake Montauk (NAN) 2-26 
Lake Montauk Harbor (NAN) 2-5, 2-16, 2-20 
Lake Ogleton, MD (NAB) 4-40 
Lake Ontario, Shoals Point, Wayne County, NY (NCB) 
20-46 
Lake Oroville, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane 
protection) (LMN) 11-5, 11-9, 11-13 
Lake Pontchartrain, North Shore, LA (LMN) 11-12 
Lake Providence Harbor, LA (LMK) 12-16 
Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-32 
Lake River Delta Area, WA (NPP) 37-41 
Lake River, WA (NPP) 37-38 
Lake Sawyer, Camp Miakonda, Toledo, OH (NCB) 
20-46 
Lake Shelbyville, IL (LSM) 14-15 
Lake Sidney Lanier, GA (SAM) 10-48 
Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels in (NCE) 21-19, 21-60, 
21-81 
Lake Texoma (Denison Dam) OK and TX (SWT) 
29-12, 29-21, 29-25 
Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN 
(NCS) 24-10, 24-22 
Lake Traverse, MN and SD (NCS) 24-25 
Lake Washington Ship Channel, WA (NPS) 38-5, 
38-15, 38-22 
Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX (SWT) 29-7, 29-18, 
29-24 
Lakeport Lake, CA (SPK) 35-41 
Lakeshore Park, Ashtabula, OH (NCB) 20-20, 20-40 
Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH (NCB) 20-43 
Lamoille River, VT (NAN) 2-30, 2-32 
Lamprey River, NH (NED) 1-51 
Lancassange Creek, Clark County, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, NY (NCB) 20-44 
Lancaster, Israel River, NH (NED) 1-19, 1-38, 1-50 
Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 
23-15 
Lansing (Grand River), MI (1958 Flood Control Act) 
(NCE) 21-97 
Lansing Harbor, IA 25-7 
LaPoint Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-19, 21-63, 21-85 
Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID (NPW) 39-15 
Larchmont Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27 
Largo Sound Channel, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Larned LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 
Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane protection) 
(LMN) 11-5, 11-9, 11-13 
Larsen Bay, AK (NPA) 40-17 
Las Animas, CO (SWA) 32-18 
Las Cruces, NM (SWA) 32-18 
Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-36 
Las Vegas Wash Tributaries, Colorado River Basin, 
NV (SPL) 33-40 
LaSueur, MN (NCS) 24-29 
Latrobe, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 
Latta Brook Road, NY (NAB) 4-38 
Lauderdale County, MS (SAM) 10-57 
Lauliifou Shoreline Protection, American Samoa (POD) 
36-11 
Launiupoko, Maui, HI (POD) 36-11 
Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 
Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORN) 15-7, 
15-9, 15-17 
Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID (NPW) 39-15 
Lavaca-Navidad River, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel 
Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-20 
Lavon Lake, TX (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-19 
Lawrence, Kansas River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 
Lawrenceburg, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-28 
Lazer Creek Lake, GA (SAM) 10-51 
Lead Bayou, MS (LMK) 12-13, 12-21 
I-34

Leading Creek, WV (ORH) 17-23 
Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM) 10-50 
Leaf and Chickasawhay River, MS (SAM) 10-49 
Leaf River, County Road Bridge, Maimhned, MS (SAM) 
10-50 
Leaf River, MS (SAM) 10-52 
Leavenworth, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-32 
Lee County, FL (SAJ) 9-17, 9-33, 9-49, 9-54 
Lee, Housatonic River, MA (NED) 1-55 
Leesville, VA (SAW) 6-30 
Leetonia, OH (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 
Leetsdale, PA (ORP) 18-24 
Leipsic River, DE (NAP) 3-28 
Leith's Creek, SC (SAN) 7-21 
Leith's Creek, Scotland County, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Leland Bowman Lock, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Leland Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-19, 21-60, 21-81 
Lemon Creek, NY (NAN) 2-32 
Lepua Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 
Les Cheneaux Island Channels, MI (NCE) 21-95, 
21-101 
Letart Falls, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Letart, WV (ORH) 17-22 
Levee Districts Between Carlyle and New Athens, IL 
Nos. 2, 5, 6, and 7 (LSM) 14-17 
Levee Districts Between Carlyle and New Athens, IL 
Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10 and 13 (LSM) 14-17 
Levee Districts Between Cowdon and Vandalia, IL 
(LSM) 14-17 
Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25 
Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-25, 
16-29 
Levee Unit 1, White River, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Levee Unit 10, White River, IN (ORL) 16-25 
Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN (ORL) 16-25, 
16-29 
Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN (ORL) 16-25 
Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-25, 
16-29 
Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN (ORL) 16-25 
Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-25 
Levee Unit 7, White River, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Levee Unit 9, White River, IN (ORL) 16-25 
Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN (ORL) 16-14, 
16-23, 16-33 
Levee Unit No. 8, White River, IN (ORL) 16-23, 
16-33 
Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and 
Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA (ORH) 
17-6, 17-13, 17-18, 17-20 
Lewis & Clark, NE & Lake Sakakawea, ND (MRO) 
26-28 
Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR 
(NPP) 37-39 
Lewis River Area, WA (NPP) 37-41 
Lewis River, WA (NPP) 37-38 
Lewisport, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-28 
Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID and WA (NPW) 39-14, 
39-19 
Lewisville Dam, TX (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-20 
Lexington Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-20, 21-61, 21-82 
Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT (NPS) 38-12, 
38-19, 38-25 
Liberal, KS (SWT) 29-28 
Liberty Local Protection Project, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, NJ (NAN) 2-30 
Lick Creek, Hartford City (Blackford County) (ORL) 
16-33 
Lick Run, Roanoke, VA (SAW) 6-30 
Licking River, KY (ORL) 16-22, 16-24, 16-31, 16-34 
Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT (NED) 1-54 
Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, NY (NCB) 20-45 
Lincoln Lake, IL (ORL) 16-26 
Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA (NPS) 38-8, 38-17, 
38-23 
Lincoln, Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-26 
Linton, ND (MRO) 26-21 
Linville River, Avery County, NC (SAW) 6-34 
Linwood Park, Vermillion, OH (NCB) 20-46 
Lisle, NY (NAB) 4-20, 4-30 
Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95 
Little Bay, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue 
River, MO (MRK) 27-17 
Little Blue River Lakes, MO (MRK) 27-4, 27-12, 
27-15 
Little Blue River, Shelby County, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Little Caillou Bayou, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Little Calumet River Basin, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN 
(NCC) 22-10, 22-17, 22-21 
I-35

Little Calumet River, IL and IN Little Calumet River 
and Tributaries, IL and IN (NCC) 22-23 
Little Calumet River, IN (NCC) 22-9, 22-16, 22-21, 
22-23 
Little Chena River Dam, AK (NPA) 40-16 
Little Colorado River at Holbrook Levee, AZ (SPL) 
33-37 
Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL (SAM) 10-50 
Little Creek, Kent Island, MD (NAB) 4-35, 4-44 
Little Dell Lake, UT, CA (SPK) 35-13, 35-30 
Little Diomede, AK (NPA) 40-17 
Little Egg Harbor, NJ (NAP) 3-28 
Little Falls, MN (NCS) 24-32 
Little Goose Lock and Dam - Lake Bryan, WA (NPW) 
39-7, 39-14, 39-18, 39-25, 39-28 
Little Harbor, NH (NED) 1-8, 1-34, 1-46 
Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA (NED) 1-51 
Little Kanawha River, WV (ORH) 17-20 
Little Lake Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-20, 21-61, 21-82 
Little Limestone Creek, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Little Machipongo River, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Little Manatee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH (ORL) 16-31 
Little Miami River, OH (ORL) 16-32 
Little Missouri River, AR (LMK) 12-16 
Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR (LMK) 
12-18 
Little Neck Bay, NY (NAN) 2-27 
Little Nemaha River, Nemaha County, NE (MRO) 
26-23 
Little Nemaha River, Tangeman, NE (MRO) 26-26 
Little Papillion Creek, NE (MRO) 26-21 
Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek, NE (MRO) 
26-26 
Little Pee Dee River, SC (SAN) 7-22 
Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, AR (SWL) 
28-7, 28-15 
Little Red River, District 1, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, 
AR (SWL) 28-22 
Little River (Creek), VA (NAO) 5-16 
Little River, AR (LMK) 12-16 
Little River at Cayuga Island, NY (NCB) 20-42 
Little River Basin, AR (SWL) 28-7 
Little River, Belfast, ME (NED) 1-55 
Little River. Cameron, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Little River, DE (NAP) 3-27 
Little River Inlet, NC and SC (SAN) 7-5, 7-12, 7-17 
Little Rock Levee, AR, East End Fourche Bayou, AR 
(SWL) 28-22 
Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, NC (SAW) 6-30, 
6-34 
Little Scooba Creek, MS (SAM) 10-57 
Little Sioux River, Anthon, IA (MRO) 26-27 
Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-8, 20-22, 
20-38 
Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Little Tallahatchie River, MS (LMK) 12-16 
Little Tennessee River, TN (ORN) 15-13 
Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT (SPK) 35-41 
Little Wabash River, Carmi, IL (ORL) 16-38 
Little Walnut Creek, Austin, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Little White Oak Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 
Little Wicomoco River (NAB) 4-7, 4-26, 4-34 
Little Wood River, ID (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 
Little Yankee Creek, Hubbard, OH (reconnaissance) 
(ORP) 18-30 
Littleville Lake, MA (NED) 1-20, 1-38 
Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 
23-12, 23-15 
Lock and Dam No. 11 (SWL) 28-25 
Lock and Dam No. 5, AR (SWL) 28-4, 28-25 
Lock Haven, PA (NAB) 4-14, 4-28, 4-37 
Lock No. 2 and Wilber D. Mills Dam (No. 2), AR 
(SWL) 28-3 
Locklies Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Lockwoods Folly River, NC (SAW) 6-4, 6-19 
Lodgepole Creek, Arvada, CO (MRO) 26-30 
Lodgepole Creek, Sidney, NE (MRO) 26-27 
Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft, NE 
(MRO) 26-26, 26-27 
Logan Creek, Pender, NE (MRO) 26-30 
Logan, OH (ORH) 17-23 
Lone Rock, Buffalo River, AR (SWL) 28-23 
Long Beach Island (NAP) 3-29, 3-30 
Long Branch, Greenville, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO (MRK) 
27-4, 27-12, 27-15 
Long Island Intracoastal W/W, NY (NAN) 2-7, 2-17, 
2-22 
Long Lake Area, Helena, AR (LMM) 13-6 
Long Lake Dam, AK (NPA) 40-16 
I-36

Long Road F.C. District, Chehalis River, WA (NPS) 
"38-31 
Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Longboat Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-30, 9-40 
Lookout Point-Dexter Lakes, OR (NPP) 37-22, 37-30, 
37-37, 37-44 
Lorain Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-9, 20-23, 20-38 
Lorain Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act modified by 1930 
R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 
Lorean Branch, Hurst, TX (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 
Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, CA (SPL) 33-2, 
33-14, 33-22, 33-36 
Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA (SPL) 33-7, 
33-18, 33-29 
Los AngelesRiver, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-18 
Lost Creek at Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-5, 26-16, 
26-21 
Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 
23-12, 23-15 
Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River, OR (NPP) 37-22, 
37-30, 37-37, 37-44 
Lost River, MN (NCS) 24-26 
Louisville, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-24, 16-28, 16-33 
Louisville, KY (Partial) (ORL) 16-25 
Louisville Lake, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24 
Louisville Point Park, Blount County, KY (ORN) 
15-18 
Loup River, Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-21 
Loves Park, IL (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-10. 
Lowell Creek, AK (NPA) 40-16 
Lowell, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-65 
Lower Auchumpkee Creek (SAM) 10-51 
Lower Branch Rush River, ND (NCS) 24-26 
Lower Butte Basin; CA (SPK) 35-44 
Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and 
WA (NPP) 37-15, 37-28, 37-36 
Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 
37-39 
Lower Creek, Lenoir, NC (SAW) 6-12, 6-21 
Lower Decatur Bend, NE (MRO) 26-32 
Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA (NPW) 39-15 
Lower Fox River, WI (1925 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 
Lower Gila River Levee and Channel Improvements 
(Gila River and Tributaries downstream from 
Painted Rock Dam) (SPL) 33-37 
Lower Grand River, MO (MRK) 27-17 
Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (NPW) 39-8, 
39-10, 39-14, 39-18, 39-26, 39-28 
Lower Green River, King County, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-22 
Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND (MRO) 26-21 
Lower Heart River, ND (MRO) 26-21 
Lower Machodoc Creek, VA (NAB) 4-35 
Lower Mission Creek, Santa Barbara, CA (SPL) 33-40 
Lower Monumental Lock and Dam - Lake Herbert G. 
West, WA (NPW) 39-9, 39-14, 39-16, 39-26, 
39-28 
Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX (SWG) 31-15, 31-22, 
31-38 
Lower San Francisco Bay, CA (SPN) 34-13 
Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including 
Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, CA (SPK) 
35-32 
Lower Santa Cruz, AZ (SPL) 33-13 
Lower Savannah River (SAS) 8-9 
Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation 
Plan, WA, OR and ID (NPW) 39-9, 39-14, 39-18 
Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD (NAB) 4-35 
Lower Walla Walla River, WA (NPW) 39-17 
Lower Woonsocket, RI (NED) 1-55, 1-62 
Lowes Wharf, MD (NAB) 4-35 
Lowndes County, MS (SAM) 10-57 
Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-8, 
18-14, 18-19, 18-28 
Lubec Channel, ME (NED) 1-51 
Lucky Peak 2nd Outlet, ID (NPW) 39-17 
Lucky Peak Lake, ID (NPW) 39-3, 39-13 
Ludington Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-21, 21-62, 21-82 
Ludlow, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-28 
Ludlow Lake, VT (NED) 1-58 
Lukfata Lake, OK (SWT) 29-26 
Lumber River, SC (SAN) 7-22 
Lummi Shore Road, Whatcom County, WA (NPS) 
38-10, 38-17, 38-24 
Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL (ORL) 16-34 
Lutsen Harbor, MN (NCE) 21-95 
Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 
16-33 
Lyman Creek, ID (NPW) 39-15 
Lynches River and Clark Creek, SC (SAN) 7-20 
Lynn Harbor, MA (NED) 1-51 
Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 
I-37

Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA (NED) 1-54 
Lynnhaven Inlet VA (NAO) 5-4, 5-17, 5-21, 5-24 
M 
Maalaea Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-2, 36-5, 36-6 
Machias River, Machias, ME (NED) 1-55 
Machias River, Machiasport, ME (NED) 1-24, 1-40, 
1-51 
Machias River, ME (NED) 1-51, 1-61 
Mackay Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-31 
Mackinac City Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 
Mackinac Island Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95 
Macy, Blackbird Creek, NE (MRO) 26-26 
Mad River at Blue Lake, CA (SPN) 34-14 
Mad River Basin, CA (SPK) 35-41 
Mad River Lake, CT (NED) 1-55 
Mad River, Waterbury, (Woodtick Area) CT (NED), 
1-23, 1-40, 1-50, 1-68 
Madison Bay, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Madison, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks (MRO) 26-26 
Madison River, Quake Lake, MT (MRO) 26-25 
Madisons Parish Port, LA (LMK) 12-16 
Magby Creek, Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-50 
Magpie and Don Julio Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-45 
Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR 
(NPP) 37-39 
Magruder Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 
18-8, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 
Mahoning River, Warren County, OH (planning and 
design analysis) (ORP) 18-30 
Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA (NAP) 3-31 
Main Street, Wellsburg, WV (completed) (ORP) 18-30 
Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, 
AR (SWL) 28-4 
Malden River, MA (NED) 1-51 
Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR 
(NPW) 39-15 
Malheur Lake Project, OR (NPW) 39-15 
Malheur River, OR (NPW) 39-17 
Malheur River, OR Vale Unit (NPW) 39-17 
Maline Creek, MO (LSM) 14-5, 14-12 
Mamaroneck Harbor (NAN) 2-27 
Manasquan River, NJ (NAP) 3-7, 3-18, 3-23 
Manatee County, FL (SAJ) 9-18, 9-33, 9-49 
Manatee Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-30, 9-40 
Manatee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 
Manchester Harbor, MA (NED) 1-58 
Manchester, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Mandan, Heart River, ND (MRO) 26-21, 26-25 
Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, HI (POD) 36-7 
Manhasset Bay, NJ (NAN) 2-32 
Manhattan, Kansas River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 
Maniece Bayou, AR (LMK) 12-19, 12-21 
Manistee Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-22, 21-62, 21-82 
Manistique Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-23, 21-65, 21-86 
Manitowoc Harbor, WI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 
Manitowoc Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-22, 21-62, 21-82 
Mankato and North Mankato, MN (NCS) 24-11, 24-22 
Mankato, North Mankato, and Lettillier, MN (NCS) 
24-31 
Mankato Township, MN (NCS) 24-32 
Mann's Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Manokin River, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT (NED) 1-28, 1-42, 1-70 
Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-19 
Mantua Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 
Manvel, ND (NCS) 24-32 
Maple Creek, Dodge City, Site 1, NE (MRO) 26-31 
Maple Creek, Dodge City, Site 2, NE (MRO) 26-31 
Maple Creek, East Fork, Howells, NE (MRO) 26-30 
Maple River, ND (NCS) 24-28, 24-29 
Mapleshade, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Marblehead Harbor, MA (NED) 1-58, 1-60 
Marengo County, AL (SAM) 10-57 
Marengo, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 
Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME (NED) 1-55 
Marietta, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Marina Del Rey, CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-14, 33-25 
Marion County Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-12, 
23-15 
Marion, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-33 
Marion, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 
Marion Reservoir, KS (SWT) 29-8, 29-18, 29-24 
Mariposa, CA (SPK) 35-43 
Markham Ferry Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 
Marmarth, ND (MRO) 26-21, 26-25 
Marne Creek, Yankton, SD (MRO) 26-26 
Marquette Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-23, 21-62, 21-83 
Marsh Creek Bridge, Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA 
(NAB) 4-40 
Marsh Creek, Geneva, NY (NCB) 20-44 
I-38

Marshall, MN (NCS) 24-11, 24-22 
Marshalltown, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 
Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR 
(NPP) 37-39 
Martin County, FL (SAJ) 9-18, 9-33, 9-49 
Martin Creek, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-50 
Martin, KY (ORH) 17-21 
Martins Ferry, OH (ORP) 18-24 
Martins Fork Lake, KY (ORN) 15-4, 15-9, 15-1 
Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA (SPK) 
35-15, 35-30 
Mary's Creek, Fort Worth and Benbrook, TX (SWF) 
30-23 
Marysville, KS (MRK) 27-18 
Marysville Lake, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Masefau Bay, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 
Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 
23-15 
Mason J. Niblack Levee, (Wabash River) (ORL) 
16-23, 16-28, 16-33 
Mason, WV (ORH) 17-22 
Massillon, OH, (ORH) 17-6, 17-13, 17-18 
Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 
Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (SWG) 31-7, 31-21, 
31-34, 31-44 
Matawan Creek (NAN) 2-32 
Matinicus Harbor, ME (NED) 1-51 
Mats Mats Bay, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Mattapoiset Harbor, MA (NED) 1-58 
Mattaponi River, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Mattituck Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-6, 2-16, 2-20 
Mattituck Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-27 
Mauckport, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Maumee Bay State Park, OH (NCB) 20-14, 20-26,. 
20-45 
Maumee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act (NCB) 
20-47 
Maumee River, Toledo, OH (NCB) 20-46 
Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 
36-10 
Maurice River, NJ (NAP) 3-6, 3-18, 3-24, 3-32 
Maurice River, NJ-Channel 8 feet deep, Delaware Bay 
to mouth 3-28 
Maurice River, NJ, Millville fixed bridge to upper end 
of project (NAP) 3-30 
Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 
14-12, 14-15 
Maxwell Creek, Parker County, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Mayaguez Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-9, 9-30, 9-40 
Mayfield Creek, KY (LMM) 13-1, 13-3 
Maysville, KY (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
Mazon River, Goose Creek, Grundy County, IL (NCC) 
23-16 
Mazon River, Goose Lake, Grundy County, IL 
McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Bank Stabilization and 
Channel Recertification, AR (SWL) 28-14, (SWT) 
29-27 
McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation Locks & 
Dams, AR (SWL) 28-14 
McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, 
OK (SWT) 29-2 29-14, 29-23 
McCook and Thorton Reservoirs, IL (NCC) 22-10, 
22-17, 22-21 
McCook Lake, SD (MRO) 26-21 
McCready's Point Road, MD (NAB) 4-38 
McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR (NPP) 
37-40 
McGarth Creek, Wichita Falls, TX (SWT) 29-8, 29-18, 
29-24 
McGary Hollow Run, Weston, WV (terminated) (ORP) 
18-30 
McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 
14-12, 14-15 
McGinnis Levee, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX (SWT) 29-8, 29-18, 
29-24 
McGregor Park, Montgomery County, TN (ORN) 
15-18 
McKees Rocks, PA (ORP) 18-24 
McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR (NPP) 37-40 
McKinney Bayou, AR (LMK) 12-19 
McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, AR (LMK) 
12-23 
McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, 
AR (SWL) 28-22 
McNary Lock and Dam - Lake Wallula, OR and WA 
(NPW) 39-10, 39-14, 39-18, 39-27 
McNary Second Powerhouse, OR & WA (NPW) 39-17 
Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek, NE (MRO) 26-26 
Medicine Bow River, Elk Mountain, WY (MRO) 26-25 
Medomak River, ME (NED) 1-51 
Meherrin River, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Mekorykuk, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Melbourne Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-9, 9-30, 9-41 
I-39

Melrose, WI (NCS) 24-32 
Melvern Lake and Pamona Lake (Road Improvements), 
KS (1974 Act) (MRK) 27-18, 27-20 
Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS 
(MRK) 27-5, 27-12, 27-15 
Melvin Price Locks & Dam (Formerly Lock and Dam 
No. 26 (Replacement)) (LSM) 14-10. 
Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN 
(LMM) 13-5 
Menemsha Creek, MA (NED) 1-51 
Menominee Harbor and River, MI and WI (NCE) 
21-23, 21-63, 21-83 
Meramec Park Lake, MO (LSM) 14-17 
Meramec River Basin Valley Park, MO (LSM) 14-5, 
14-8, 14-12 
Merced County Stream Group, CA (SPK) 35-16, 
35-30, 35-43 
Merced County Streams, CA (SPK) 35-15, 35-30 
Merced River, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO (MRK) 27-17 
Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee 
District, IL (LSM) 14-12, 14-15 
Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL (NCR) 
23-12, 23-15 
Mermentau River, Grand Chenier, LA (LMN) 11-6, 
11-10, 11-13 
Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des 
Cannes, LA (LMN) 11-13 
Mermentau River, LA (LMN) 11-15 
Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 
Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME (NED) 1-55 
Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA (NED) 1-24 
Merrimack River, MA (NED) 1-51 
Metamora Lake, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-32 
Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Methow River, State Highway No. 16 Bridge, Twisp, 
WA (NPS) 38-28 
Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of 
Twisp, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Methow River, WA (NPS) 38-28, 38-30 
Metlakatla Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-4, 40-11, 40-15 
Metropolis, IL (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Miami Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-9, 9-31, 9-41 
Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, 
OH (ORL) 16-20, 16-24 
Miami River, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Mianus River, CT (NED) 1-51 
Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River 
Basin, OH (ORP), 18-8, 18-14, 18-20, 18-28 
Michigan City Harbor, IN (NCC) 22-5, 22-15, 22-20, 
22-22 
Middle Beach, CT (NED) 1-54 
Middle Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Middle Gila River Channel Improvements, upper end 
of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback 
damsite to Salt River) (SPL) 33-37 
Middle Hooper Island, MD (NAB) 4-38 
Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder, NE (MRO) 26-27 
Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to 
Belen, NM (SWA) 32-7, 32-12, 32-14 
Middle River and Connecting Channel, CA (SPK) 
35-38 
Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Middle River at Argyle, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
Middle School, Wellsburg, WV (completed) (ORP) 
18-30 
Middleport, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Middlesboro (Diversion Canal) KY (ORN) 15-18 
Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-14, 
15-18 
Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY (ORN) 
15-5, 15-9 
Middleton Shoals, GA & SC (SAS) 8-23 
Midland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR 
(NPP) 37-39 
Midland/Jal Draw, Midland, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Milan, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 
Miles City, MT (MRO) 26-21 
Milford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-51 
Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 
Milford Lake, Republican River, KS (MRK) 27-5, 
27-12, 27-15, 27-22 
Milk River, Havre, MT (MRO) 26-23 
Milk River, Malta, MT (MRO) 26-25, 26-30 
Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT (NED) 1-55, 1-63 
Mill Creek, Bennington Lake, WA (NPW) 39-3, 
39-13, 39-17 
Mill Creek, Catawaba River, Old Fort, NC (SAN) 6-30 
Mill Creek, Dalton, GA (SAM) 10-50, 10-52 
Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (SWL) 28-8, 28-16 
Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY (ORL) 16-23, 
16-31, 16-33 
Mill Creek Levees (SPL) 33-37 
I-40

Mill Creek, Mcgee, MS (SAM) 10-52 
Mill Creek, MD (NAB) 4-40 
Mill Creek, NC (SAW) 6-31, 6-34 
Mill Creek, OH (ORH) 17-23 
Mill Creek, OH (ORL) 16-4, 16-14 
Mill Creek, Salem, OR (NPP) 37-40, 37-43 
Mill Creek, Sinclairville, NY (construction) (ORP) 
18-30 
Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS (SAM) 10-19, 10-35, 10-46 
Mill Creek, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Mill Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Mill Creek, WA (NPW) 39-17 
Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR (NPP) 
37-40 
Mill Lake, Blue River, MO (MRK) 27-18 
Millbranch Stream, Fairmont, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Miller, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Miller Pond Drainage District, IL (LSM) 14-15 
Miller Run, Cecil Township, PA (construction) (ORP) 
18-30 
Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-26, 10-35 
Millersburg, OH (ORH) 17-23 
Millford Haven, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Millican, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Millington, TN (LMM) 13-2, 13-3 
Millwood Lake, AR (SWL) 28-8, 28-16, 28-30 
Millwood, WV (ORH) 17-22 
Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR (NWP) 
39-15 
Milton Harbor (NAN) 2-27, 2-24 
Milton, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Milwaukee Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-24, 21-63, 21-83 
Milwaukee Outer Harbor, WI (1935 R&H Act) (NCE) 
21-98 
Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Mingo Creek, OK (SWT) 29-8, 29-18, 29-24 
Mingo Creek, SC (SAN) 7-20 
Mingo Junction, OH (ORP) 18-24 
Mining City Lake, KY (Green River) (ORL) 16-24, 
16-32 
Minnesota River at Henderson, MN (NCS) 24-11, 
24-23 
Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
Minnesota River, Belgrade Township, MN (NCS) 
24-11, 24-23 
Minnesota River, MN (NCS) 24-2, 24-21, 24-25 
Minot, ND (NCS) 24-26 
Miscellaneous Work Under Special Authorization 
Fort Worth District (SWF) 30-11 
Sacramento District (SPK) 35-26 
San Francisco District (SPN) 34-6 
Seattle District (NPS) 38-13 
St. Paul District (NCS) 24-18 
Mispillion River, DE (NAP) 3-7, 3-18, 3-25 
Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI (NED) 1-54, 1-60 
Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID (NPW) 39-15 
Mission Beach, CA (SPL) 33-30 
Mission Zanja, CA (SPL) 33-31 
Missisquoi River at Richford, VT (NAN) 2-30 
Mississinewa Lake, IN (ORL) 16-8, 16-16 
Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, MO (LSM) 
14-15 
Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO 
(LSM) 14-17 
Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO 
(LSM) 14-15 
Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL (underseepage 
measures) (LSM) 14-15 
Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor 
(LSM) 14-17 
Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO (LSM) 14-15 
Mississippi River Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA 
(LMN) 11-10, 11-14 
Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, 
MO and IL (LSM) 14-2, 14-8, 14-10 
Mississippi River Between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, 
MN (NCS) 24-25 
Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and 
Minneapolis, MN (Includes Melvin Price Locks & 
DAM) (LSM) 14-2 
Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and 
Minneapolis, MN (NCR) 23-3 (NCS) 24-2 
Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and 
Minneapolis, MN 25-1, 25-4, 25-10 
Mississippi River Commission 41-1 
Mississippi River, Fridley, MN (NCS) 24-30 
Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (LMN) 11-2, 11-9, 
11-11 
Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, LA 
(LMN) 11-14 
Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA (LMN) 11-14 
Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, 
LA (LMN) 11-2, 11-9, 11-11 
1-41

Missoula (Sewage Treatment Plant), MT (NPS) 38-28 
Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD 
(MRO) 26-5, 26-16, 26-22 
Missouri River at New Haven, MO (Sec 212, 1950 
Act) (MRK) 27-17 
Missouri River, Aten, NE (MRO) 26-21 
Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood, SD 
(MRO) 26-25 
Missouri River, Bank Stabilization and Navigation, NE 
(MRO) 26-9, 26-15, 26-31 
Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton, MT 
(MRO) 26-25 
Missouri River Between Ft. Peck Dam, MT and Gavins 
Point Dam, SD & NE (MRO) 26-5, 26-16, 26-22 
Missouri River Dike Lowering, NE (MRO) 26-32 
Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, 
KS, and ND (MRO) 26-6, 26-16, 26-22 
Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, 
KS and MO (MRK) 27-2, 27-11, 27-14 
Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND 
(MRO) 26-24 
Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA 
(MRO) 26-6, 26-16, 26-22 
Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO 
(MRO) 26-22, 26-24 
Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO 
(Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-5, 27-12, 
27-15, 27-19 
Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA, to Rule, 
NE, (MRO) 26-24, 
Missouri River Levee Unit L536 Derion Bend, MO 
(MRO) 26-32 
Missouri River Main Stem (MRK) 27-20 
Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-27 
Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review 
and Update (MRO) 26-13, 26-20, 26-25 
Missouri River, Niobrara, NE (MRO) 26-22 
Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE (MRO) 
26-3, 26-15, 26-21 
Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (MRK) 27-2, 
27-11, 27-14 
Mitigation of Shore Damages 
Detroit District (NCE) 21-41- 
New England Division (NED) 1-16, 1-64 
Mixon Creek, McGee, MS (SAM) 10-49 
Mobile Bay to New Orleans, LA (SAM) 10-42 
Mobile Harbor, AL (SAM) 10-13, 10-32, 10-42 
Mocassin Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Moccasin Springs, MO (LSM) 14-14 
Moclips River, Moclips, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Mohave Floodwarning, CA (SPL) 33-31 
Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA (SPL) 
33-8, 33-18, 33-31 
Mokelumne River, CA (SPK) 35-38 
Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR (NPP) 
37-40 
Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Moline Harbor, IL 25-7 
Moline, IL (NCR) 23-13 
Molly Ann's Brook, NJ (NAP) 3-15, 3-21, 3-27 
Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County, IA 
(MRO) 26-27 
Monongahela River, PA and WV (ORP) 18-2, 18-13, 
18-17 
Monoosnoc Brook, MA (NED) 1-58 
Monoosnoc Lake, MA (NED) 1-58 
Monroe and West Monroe Parish, LA and Ouachita 
Parish, LA (LMK) 12-13 
Monroe Bay and Creek, VA (NAB) 4-6, 4-23, 4-30 
Monroe County, AL (SAM) 10-57 
Monroe County, FL (SAJ) 9-48 
Monroe County, MS (SAM) 10-57 
Monroe Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-25, 21-63, 21-83 
Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) (LMK) 
12-18, 12-21 
Monroe Lake, IN (ORL) 16-9, 16-16, 16-31 
Montcalm, WV (ORH) 17-24 
Monterey Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-13 
Montgomery County, AL (SAM) 10-57 
Montour Falls, Oswega River Basin, NY (NCB) 20-44 
Moore, OK (SWT) 29-30 
Moorefield, WV (NAB) 4-14, 4-28, 4-74, 4-45 
Moores Ferry, VA (ORH) 17-23 
Moorhead, MN (NCS) 24-28 
Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Moosabec Bar, ME (NED) 1-51 
Morais River, ND (NCS) 24-32 
Moravian Creek, Wilksboro, NC (SAW) 6-34 
Morehead City Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-6, 6-20 
Morehead City Harbor, NC Jetties at Beaufort Inlet 
(SAW) 6-31 
Morehead Harbor, West Turning Basin Expansion, NC 
(SAW) 6-32 
I-42

Morgan City and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane protection) 
(LMN) 11-12, 11-15 
Morgan Point Bendway Closure Structure (SWL) 
28-13, 28-18 
Moriches Bay, NY (NAN) 2-28 
Moriches Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-27 
Mormon Slough, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Morrison, Bear Creek, CO (MRO) 26-23 
Morristown Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-42 
Morro Bay Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-14, 33-25 
Moscow, OH (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORP) 
18-9, 18-14, 18-20, 18-28 
Moss Landing Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-7 
Moss Street, Pecan Creek, Gainsville, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Mott, ND (MRO) 26-22 
Mound State Park, Moundville, AL (SAM) 10-20, 
10-35, 10-40 
Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL 
(LMM) 13-5 
Moundsville, WV (ORP) 18-24 
Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 
Mount Clemens, Clinton River, MI (NCE) 21-86 
Mount Morris Lake, NY Genesee River (NCB) 20-14, 
20-26, 20-45 
Mount St. Helens and Vicinity, WA (NPP) 37-16, 
37-28, 37-36 
Mount Vernon, IN (ORL) 16-24 
Mountain Brook Dam, NH (NED) 1-58 
Mountain Point, AK (NPA) 40-4, 40-10, 40-13 
Mouth of Yazoo River, MS (LMK) 12-16 
Moycock Creek, NC (SAW) 6-31, 6-32 
MS Riverview St, Bellview, IA IL (NCR) 23-16 
Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN 
(NCC) 22-22 
Mt. Holly, NJ (NAP) 3-29 
Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA (NPP) 37-16, 
37-28, 37-36 
Mucky Creek, Mapleton, IA (MRO) 26-27 
Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR (NPP) 
37-41 
Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE (MRO) 26-22 
Mud Lake Area, ID (NPW) 39-17, 39-17 
Mud Mountain Dam, WA (NPS) 38-10, 38-18, 38-23 
Mud River, WV (ORH) 17-23 
Muddy Creek Dam, PA (ORP) 18-24 
Muddy Creek, Int Hwy 15 Frontage Road, Vaughn, 
MT (MRO) 26-25 
Muddy Creek Near Syracuse, NE (MRO) 26-26 
Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Mulberry Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power (SAN) 
7-10, 7-21 
Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under 
Construction F-1 
Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power in 
Operation E-1 
Multiple Purpose Projects, Including St. Marys River, 
MI (NCE) 21-96 
Multnomah Channel, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 
37-40 
Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-39 
Muncie, IN (White River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 
Munday, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL (SAM) 
10-50 
Murder Creek, Brewton, AL (SAM) 10-20, 10-35, 
10-46 
Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL (SAM) 10-50 
Murderkill River, DE (NAP) 3-7, 3-18, 3-25 
Murfreesboro Dam and Lake (LMK) 12-21 
Murray County, GA (SAM) 10-57 
Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), AR (SWL) 28-4, 
28-26 
Murrells Inlet, SC (SAN) 7-6, 7-12, 7-17 
Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN (ORL) 16-33 
Muscatine Harbor, IA 25-7 
Muscatine Harbor, IA IL (NCR) 23-11 
Muscatine Island, IA (NCR) 23-6, 23-8 
Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine-Louisa 
County Drainage District, No. 13, IA (NCC) 
23-10, 23-12, 23-15 
Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA (NCR) 23-12 
Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL (NCR) 23-11 
Muskegon Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-26, 21-64, 21-84 
Muskingum River Lakes, OH (ORH) 17-7, 17-14, 
17-18 
Muskingum River, OH (ORH) 17-20 
Mustinka River, MN (NCS) 24-30 
*M yers Chuck Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-16 
Myrtle Beach (Anchorage Basin), SC (SAN) 7-22 
Myrtle Beach, SC (SAN) 7-8, 7-13, 7-18 
I-43

Mystic River, CT (NED) 1-51, 1-58 
Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 
Mystic River, MA (NED) 1-51 
N 
N.C. Aquarium, Dare County, NC (SAW) 6-12, 6-21 
Naches River, Naches, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River, IA (MRO) 26-27 
Nahunta Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Naknek River, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Nameless Creek, County Road 850 N, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Namo River, Guam (POD) 36-9 
Nan Cove, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Nandua Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Federated States 
of Micronesia (POD) 36-3, 36-5, 36-6 
Nansemond River, VA (NAO) 5-4, 5-9, 5-13, 5-16 
Nantasket Beach, MA (NED) 1-58 
Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Nanticoke River, DE AND MD (NAB) 4-6, 4-26, 4-34 
Nanticoke River, MD (NAB) 4-7, 4-26, 4-34 
Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA (NED) 1-51 
Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA (inactive portion) 
(NED) 1-58 
Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted 
portion) (NED) 1-58 
Napa River Basin, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Napa River, CA (SPN) 34-7 
Narragansett Pier, RI (NED) 1-59 
Narraguagus River, ME (NED) 1-51 
Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME (NED) 1-24, 1-41, 
1-51 
Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR (LMK) 12-18, 12-21 
Narrows of Lake Champlain, NY (NAN) 2-6, 2-17, 
2-20 
Nashua, NH (NED) 1-55, 1-65 
Nassau County, FL (SAJ) 9-19, 9-33, 9-50 
Natches Port Area, MS (LMK) 12-21 
Natchitoches Parish, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 
National Emergency Preparedness 
Buffalo District (NCB) 20-16 
Chicago District (NCC) 22-6 
Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-7, 27-13 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-28 
Omaha District (MRO) 26-14 
Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-15 
St. Paul 24-20 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 
Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response & Recovery 
Activities 51-1 
Navajo Reservoir, NM (SPK) 35-38 
Navarro Mills Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 
Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public 
Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) (NED) 1-14, 1-64 
Navigation Locks and Dams Operable C-1 
Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and 
Condition Surveys only were Conducted during 
Period (SAJ) 9-15 
Navigation Projects Under Construction D-1 
Navigation Work Under Special Authorization 
Baltimore District (NAB) 4-11 
Buffalo District (NCB) 20-13, 20-50 
Charleston District (SAN) 7-7 
Detroit District (NCE) 21-40 
Galveston District (SWG) 31-10 
Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-15 
Louisville District (ORL) 16-3 
Little Rock District (SWL) 28-4 
Memphis District (LMM) 13-1 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-17 
Nashville District (ORN) 15-4 
New Orleans District (LMN) 11-3 
New York District (NAN) 2-10 
Norfolk District (NAO) 5-9, 5-14 
Omaha District (MRO) 26-3 
Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-2 
Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-15 
Portland District (NPP) 37-7 
San Francisco District (SPN) 34-6 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-6 
Seattle District (NPS) 38-5 
St. Louis District (LSM) 14-3 
Vicksburg District (LMK) 12-3 
Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-2 
Wilmington District (SAW) 6-28 
Nawiliwili Deep Draft Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-10 
Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 
Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 
Neabsco Creek, MD (NAB) 4-8, 4-26, 4-34 
Neabsco Creek, VA (1811 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 
4-40 
Neah Bay, Clallam County, WA (NPS) 38-28 
I-44

Neah Bay, WA (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-22, 38-26 
Neale Sound, MD (NAB) 4-36, 4-44 
Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL (NCR) 23-12 
Neavitt Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier to 
Beaumont, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Needs, San Bernardino, CA SPL) 33-37 
Nehalem Bay, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Nehalem River, Sunset Drainage District, OR (NPP) 
37-43 
Nelson Run, Ross Township, PA (construction) (ORP) 
18-30 
Neodesha Lake, KS (SWL) 28-28 
Neodesha Lake, KS (SWT) 29-27 
Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-23, 
16-33 
Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA (NAP) 3-27 
Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Nestucca River, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Neuse River, 300-foot wide channel in front of New 
Bern, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Neuse River Barrier, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Neuse River Basin, NC (SAW) 6-12, 6-32 
Neuse River, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-31 
Neuse River, Oriental, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Neva and Olga Straits, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Neville Island, PA (ORP) 18-24 
New Albany, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 
New Amsterdam, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (NED) 1-51 
New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA 
(uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 
New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA 
(NED) 1-26, 1-41, 1-51 
New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (NED) 
1-21, 1-34, 1-42 
New Buffalo Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-26, 21-64, 21-84 
New Bullards Bar, CA (SPK) 35-39 
New Cumberland, WV (ORP) 18-24 
New Harbor, ME (NED) 1-51 
New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 
16-23, 16-26, 16-28, 16-29 
New Harmony, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 
New Haven Breakwater, CT (NED) 1-51 
New Haven Harbor, CT (NED) 1-8, 1-34, 1-47 
New Haven Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 
1-59 
New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NAP) 3-8, 3-19, 
3-25 
New Jersey Pierhead Channel (NAN) 2-28 
New Kensington and Parnassus, PA (ORP) 18-24 
New London, CT (NED) 1-55 
New London Harbor, CT (NED) 1-51 
New Madrid Harbor, MO (LMM) 13-4 
New Martinsville, WV (ORH) 17-22 
New Matamoras, OH (ORH) 17-22 
New Melones Lake, CA (SPK) 35-24 
New Orleans to Venice, LA (Hurricane protection) 
(LMN) 11-5, 11-10, 11-13 
New Pass, Sarasota, FL (SAJ) 9-10, 9-31, 9-42 
New Richmond, OH (ORL) 16-16, 16-29 
New River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
New River, NC (SAW) 6-30 
New River, Onslow County, NC (SAW) 6-30 
New River, WV and VA (ORH) 17-20 
New Rochelle Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27 
New York and New Jersey Channels (NAN) 2-27, 2-32 
New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift 
(NAN) 2-7, 2-17, 2-20 
New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage 
Areas (NAN) 2-7, 2-17, 2-20 
Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, NJ (NAN) 
2-27,. 2-32 
Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) (ORH) 17-21 
Newark, OH (ORH) 17-7, 17-14, 17-18, 17-24 
Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA 
(NPS) 38-28 
Newbegun Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Newburgh, IN (Ohio River) (ORL) 16-23 
Newburyport Harbor, MA (NED) 1-8, 1-33, 1-44 
Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 
(NED) 1-59 
Newmarket Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 
Newport Bay Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-14, 33-26, 
33-36 
Newport Harbor, RI (NED) 1-51 
Newport, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 
Newport News Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Newport, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Newport, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Newport, White River, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Newport-Wilder, KY (ORL) 16-26 
I-45

Newry-Old Pickens, SC (SAS) 8-23 
Newt Graham Lock and Dam (No. 18) (SWL) 28-26 
Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK (SWT) 29-27 
Newtown Creek (NAN) 2-27 
Niagara Remedial Works, NY (NCB) 20-42 
Niagara River, Compensating Works, 1930 R&H Act 
(NCB) 20-47 
Niagara River, NY (NCB) 20-42 
Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT (NED) 1-51 
Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY (ORL) 16-33 
Nichols, NY (NAB) 4-38, 4-44 
Nimrod Lake, AR (SWL) 28-8, 28-16 
Nimrod Waterfowl Levee (SWL) 28-13, 28-17 
Nine Mile Drain, Scottsbluff, NE (MRO) 26-31 
Ninilchik Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-4, 40-11, 40-15 
Niobrara River (Carns Bridge), NE (MRO) 26-31 
Niobrara River, Bassett, NE (MRO) 26-27 
Niobrara River-Carns Bridge, Bassett, NE (MRO) 
26-27 
Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA (MRO) 26-22, 
26-27 
Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA (MRO) 26-30 
Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Nixon Creek, TN (LMM) 13-5 
Noatak, AK (NPA) 40-18 
Nogales Wash, AZ (SPL) 33-8, 33-19 
Nolin Lake, KY (ORL) 16-9, 16-16, 16-31 
Nome, AK (NPA) 40-17 
Nome Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-4, 40-11, 40-15 
Nomini Bay and Creek, VA (NAB) 4-36 
Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, TN (LMM) 
13-3, 13-5 
Nonconnah Creek at Perkins, Memphis, TN (LMM) 
13-5 
Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN 
(LMM) 13-5 
Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT (NED) 1-55 
Nookagee Lake, MA (NED) 1-59 
Noosack River, above Highway 1Z Bridge, WA (NPS) 
38-28 
Noosack River, Acme, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Noosack River, Everson, WA (NPS) 38-31 
Noosack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA (NPS) 
38-28 
Noosack River, Middle Fork, Deming, WA (NPS) 
38-28 
Noosack River, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Noosack River, Whatcom County, WA (NPS) 38-31 
Norco Bluff, CA (SPL) 33-31 
Norfolk Floodwall, VA (NAO) 5-17 
Norfolk Harbor and Channels, VA (NAO) 5-5, 5-13, 
5-17, 5-25 
Norfolk Harbor, Eastern Branch, VA (NAO) 5-13 
Norfolk Harbor, Southern Branch, VA (NAO) 5-13 
Norfolk Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-4, 5-10, 5-13 
Norfolk Harbor, Western Branch, VA (NAO) 5-13 
Norfolk Lake, AR (SWL) 28-12, 28-17, 28-30 
Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-22 
Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River, NE (MRO) 26-26 
Norfork Lake, AR (SWL) 28-11, 28-17, 28-31 
Normal, KY (ORH) 17-22 
Noroton Bay, Darien, CT (NED) 1-60 
Norrel Lock and Dam (No. 1) and Entrance Channel, 
AR (SWL) 28-4, 28-25 
North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, MA (NAN) 2-30 
North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL 
(LSM) 14-15 
North Andover and Lawrence, MA (NED) 1-59 
North Beach Boulevard, Bay St. Louis, MS (SAM) 10- 
19, 10-34, 10-45 
North Branch, Chicago River, IL (NCC) 22-11, 22-17, 
22-21 
North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH (ORH) 
17-8, 17-14, 17-18 
North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT (NED) 1-56, 
1-64 
North Canadian above Lake Overholser (SWT) 29-29 
North Canadian River, Okfuskee County, OK (SWT) 
29-29 
North Canadian River Wastewater Plant, Oklahoma 
City, OK (SWT) 29-28 
North Ellenville, NY (NAN) 2-13, 2-18, 2-22, 2-26 
North Fork, Kentucky River, Jackson, KY (ORL) 
16-35 
North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA (ORH) 17-8, 
17-14, 17-19 
North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA (SPK) 35-39 
North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH (NED) 
1-59 
North Hartland Lake, VT (NED) 1-20, 1-39 
North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 
I-46

North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA (NED) 1-54 
North.Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA (NED) 1-56 
North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA (NED) 1-56 
North Nashua River, Leominster, (Sewer Line) MA 
(NED) 1-25, 1-41, 1-51, 1-69 
North Nashua River, Leominster, MA (NED) 1-25, 
1-41, 1-51, 1-69 
North-Pass-Pass Manchac, LA (LMN) 11-3, 11-9, 
11-13 
North Platte River at Casper, MY (MRO) 26-31 
North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare, NE 
(MRO) 26-26 
North River Dike, NC (SAW) 6-31 
North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA (NED) 1-54 
North Second Street at Wolf River, Memphis, TN 
(LMM) 13-5 
North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, NY 
(NAN) 2-32 
North Shore, Santa Rosa Island, FL (SAM) 10-52 
North Springfield Lake, VT (NED) 1-20, 1-39 
North Stratford, NH (NED) 1-63 
North Turkey Creek, Jefferson, County, CO (MRO) 
26-31 
Northeast Cape Fear River, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-30 
Northeast Harbor, ME (NED) 1-51 
Northeast River, MD (NAB) 4-8, 4-26, 4-34 
Northfield Brook Lake, CT (NED) 1-23 
Northhampton, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 
Northport Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27 
Northport Harbor, WI (1975 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 
21-98 
Northport Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-95 
Norwalk, Ct (NED) 1-56 
Norwalk Harbor, CT (NED) 1-51 
Norwalk-Wilton, CT (NED) 1-59 
Norwich, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-66 
Norwich, NY (NAB) 4-38, 4-44 
Nottoway River, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Noxubee River, MS (SAM) 10-49, 10-51 
Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS (SAM) 
10-50 
Noyo River and Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-5, 34-7 
Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 
14-12, 14-16 
O 
O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 
30-20 
O'Hare Reservoir, IL (NCC) 22-12, 22-17, 22-21 
Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and 
ND (MRO) 26-13, 26-20, 26-25 
Oahe Wildlife Restoration (MRO) 26-28 
Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA 
(NED) 1-54 
Oak Creek at Wakpala, SD (MRO) 26-30 
Oak St. Bridge, Midland, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Oakdale, PA (ORP) 18-23 
Oakford Special Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 
23-15 
Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI (NED) 1-54 
Oakland Harbor (Deepen Tidal Canal), CA (SPN) 
34-13 
Oakland Harbor (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge), CA (SPN) 
34-13 
Oakland Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-1, 34-9, 34-13 
Oates Creek, Richmond County, GA (SAS) 8-8, 8-14, 
8-20, 8-23 
Obey River, TN (ORN) 15-13 
Obion River, TN (LMM) 13-4 
Occohannock Creek, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-16 
Occoquan Creek, VA (NAB) 4-36 
Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-36 
Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD 
(NAB) 4-8, 4-26, 4-35 
Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD 
(1954 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-40 
Ocean City, NJ (NAP) 3-30 
Ocean Springs Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-51 
Oceana, WV (ORH) 17-21 
Oceanside Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-15, 33-26, 
33-38 
Oceanside, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-36 
Oceanside, Sand By-pass, CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-15, 33- 
26 
Ochlockonee Bay, Wakulla County, FL (SAM) 10-51 
Ochlockonee River, FL (SAM) 10-49 
Oconto Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-27, 21-65, 21-84 
Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Ocracoke Island, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Oelwein, Fayette County, IA (NCR) 23-16 
Ofu Airstrip (West End), American Samoa (POD) 
36-11 
Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 
I-47

Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-7 
Ogdensburg Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-42 
Ogdensburg Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 
Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) (ORH) 17-8, 
17-14 
Ohio River Basin (Louisville District) (ORL) 16-10, 
16-16, 16-19 
Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) (ORN) 15-5, 
15-12, 15-17 
Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) (ORP) 18-9, 
18-14, 18-20. 18-28 
Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY (ORL) 16-34, 16-35 
Ohio River, Carollton, KY (ORL) 16-35 
Ohio River, Chester, WV (planning and design 
analysis) (ORP) 18-30 
Ohio River, City Park, West Point, KY (ORL) 16-35 
Ohio River, Cloverport, KY (ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, Daviess County, KY (ORL) 16-34, 16-35 
Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL (ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, Hawesville, KY (ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, Lewisport, KY (ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, Madison, IN (ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, Moscow, OH (ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN (ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, New Richmond, KY (ORL) 16-35 
Ohio River, Newburgh, IN (ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, Ohio County, IN (ORL) 16-38 
Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN (ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY (ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, Owensboro, KY (ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, Owensboro Riverport Authority, KY 
(ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone County, KY (ORL) 
16-34 
Ohio River, Rockport/Rockport Landing, IN (ORL) 
16-34 
Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN (ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN (ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, Switzerland County, IN (ORL) 16-38 
Ohio River, Troy, IN (ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, Upper River Road, Jefferson County, KY 
(ORL) 16-34 
Ohio River, Vanderburg County, IN (ORL) 16-34 
Oil Branch Creek, Coffeyville, KS (SWT) 29-28 
Oil City Ice Control Structures, PA (ORP) 18-22 
Oil City, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-30 
Oil Creek, Oil City, Venango County, PA (terminated) 
(ORP) 18-30 
Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN (NCR) 23-12 
Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Okanogan River at Outlet of Osoyoos Lake, WA (NPS) 
38-28 
Okanogan River, Omak, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Okanogan River, Oroville, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Okanogan River, Tonasket Creek and Osoyoos Lake, 
WA (NPS) 38-28 
Okanogan River, WA (NPS) 38-28, 38-30 
Okatibbee Lake, MS (SAM) 10-19, 10-34, 10-45 
Okeechobee Waterway, FL (SAJ) 9-10, 9-31, 9-42 
Oklahoma City, Floodway, OK (SWT) 29-28 
Oklahoma City LPP, OK (SWT) 29-26 
Oklawaha River, FL (SAJ) 9-10, 9-31, 9-42 
Oktassi Creek, AL (SAM) 10-54 
Olcott Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-9, 20-23, 20-40 
Old Field Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Old Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-5, 40-11, 40-15 
Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK (NPA) 40-4, 40-10, 
40-13 
Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN (ORN) 15-14 
Old Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-50 
Old Kingstree Canal, Williamsburg County, SC (SAN) 
7-24 
Old River, CA (SPK) 35-38 
Old Town Creek (SAM) 10-49 
Oldmans Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27, 3-30 
Olean, NY (ORP) 18-22 
Oliver Hill, KY (ORH) 17-24 
Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL (SAM) 10-9, 
10-31, 10-39 
Olympia Harbor (1945 R&H Act), WA (NPS) 38-30 
Olympia Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-5, 38-16, 38-22 
Olyphant, Lackawanna River, PA (NAB) 4-15, 4-28, 
4-37 
Omaha, NE (MRO) 26-22, 26-24, 26-26 
Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 
Onancock River, VA (NAO) 5-16, 5-17 
Onandaga Storm Water Discharge (NCB) 20-12, 20-21 
Oneida Creek, NY (NCB) 20-45 
Oneonta, NY (NAB) 4-44 
Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, NY (NCB) 20-44 
Onondaga Lake, NY (NCB) 20-35 
Ontonagon Harbor, MI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 
Ontonagon Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-27, 21-65, 21-84 
I-48

Oologah Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 
Oologah Lake, OK (SWT) 29-8, 29-18, 29-24, 29-27 
Oostanaula River, GA (SAM) 10-49, 10-51 
Open-channel work, Ohio River (ORP) 18-3 
Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY (ORL) 16-2, 
16-14 
Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORL) 16-3 
Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORH) 17-2 
Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORD) 19-3, 19-5, 
19-6 
Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing (NPW) 
39-21 
Open River Pasco to Lewiston (NPW) 39-21 
Optima Lake, OK (SWT) 29-9, 29-18, 29-24 
Oracoke Inlet, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Orange River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor), OR (NPP) 
37-38 
Oriental (South Avenue), NC (SAW) 6-13, 6-21 
Orleans, IN (ORL) 16-26 
Oro Grande Wash Channel Improvements, Mojave 
River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-37 
Orofino Creek & Clearwater River, Orofino, ID 
(NPW) 39-15 
Orowoc Creek, NY (NAN) 2-32 
Orwell Lake, MN (NCS) 24-32, 24-33 
Orwell River (Otter Tail River), MN 24-30 
Osage River, KS and MO (MRK) 27-20 
Osage River, MO lock and dam (MRK) 27-16 
Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS (MRK) 27-17, 
27-20 
Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, 
MS (SAM) 10-50 
Osborne Park Inlets, Willoughby, OH (NCB) 20-46 
Osceola Harbor, AR (LMM) 13-4 
Oslo, MN (NCS) 24-29 
Oswego Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-10, 20-23, 20-42 
Oswego Harbor, NY 1930 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 
Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 
Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects 
Buffalo District (NCB) 20-15, 20-48 
Charleston District (SAN) 7-9 
Chicago District (NCC) 22-8 
Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-22, 9-54 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-17,. 10-48 
New England Division (NED) 1-16, 1-67 
New York District (NAN) 2-14, 2-26 
Other Authorized Bridge Alterations (NCC) 22-15 
Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 
Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-10 
Buffalo District (NCB) 20-16, 20-49 
Charleston District (SAN) 7-10, 7-21 
Chicago District (NCC) 22-12 
Detroit District (NCE) 21-45, 21-92 
Fort Worth District (SWF) 30-12, 30-22 
Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-26 
Little Rock District (SWL) 28-8, 28-23 
Louisville District (ORL) 16-3, 16-23, 16-24 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10-23 10-49 
New England Division (NED) 1-30, 1-58, 1-59, 
1-60 
Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12, 18-22, 18-23 
Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-8 
Tulsa District (SWT) 29-11, 29-26 
Other Authorized Navigation Projects 
Buffalo District (NCB) 20-13, 20-47 
Charleston District (SAN) 7-7 
Detroit District (NCE) 21-40, 21-91 
Huntington District (ORH), 17-2, 17-20 
Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-15, 9-53 
Little Rock District (SWL) 28-4, 28-22 
Louisville District (ORL) 16-3, 16-22 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10-48 
New England Division (NED) 1-14, 1-53, 1-54, 
1-55, 1-56 
New York District (NAN) 2-10, 2-24, 2-25 
Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-4 
Rock Island District (NCR) 23-4 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-6 
Tulsa District (SWT) 29-2, 25 
Other Work Under Special Authority 
Sacramento District (SPK) 35-26 
St. Paul District (NCS) 24-20 
Ottawa, IL (NCR) 23-16 
Ottawa, OH (NCB) 20-44 
Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS (MRK) 
27-17, 27-20 
Otter Brook Lake, NH (NED) 1-20, 1-39 
Otter Creek and Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR (SWL) 
28-22 
Otter Creek, N. Terre Haute, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Otter Creek, VT (NAN) 2-32 
Ottumwa, IA (NCR) 23-12 
1-49

Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (LMK) 
12-2, 12-9, 12-11 
Ouachita River and Tributaries, AR and LA (LMK) 
12-5, 12-12 
Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (LMK) 12-18 
Ouachita River Levees, LA (LMK) 12-5, 12-10 
Ouzinkie, AK (NPA) 40-17 
Overton-Red River Waterway, LA (LMK) 12-16 
Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, 
State Ditch and Crane Brook, NY (NCB) 20-44 
Owens, CA (SPK) 35-43 
Owensboro, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Owl Creek, West Carrolton, OH (ORL) 16-35 
Owl's Head Harbor, ME (NED) 1-51 
Owyhee River, OR (NPW) 39-13, 39-16 
Oxford, NY (NAB) 4-20, 4-30 
Oyster Channel, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Oyster Creek, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Ozan Creek, AR (LMK) 12-18 
Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 13), AR (SWL) 
28-11, 28-17, 28-31 
Ozona, FL channel and turning basin (SAJ) 9-51 
P 
Paauau Stream, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-9 
Paducah, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 
Pagan River, VA (NAO) 5-6, 5-13, 5-18, 5-22, 5-25 
Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 
Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 
Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH (ORH) 17-24 
Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH (ORH) 
17-24 
Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-8, 
17-14, 17-19 
Painted Post, NY (NAB) 4-38 
Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ (SPL) 33-8, 
33-19, 33-31 
Paintsville Lake, KY (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19 
Pajaro River, CA (SPK) 35-16, 35-30 
Pajaro River, CA (SPN) 34-14 
Palm Beach County, FL (SAJ) 9-19, 9-34, 9-50 
Palm Beach County, FL, from Lake Worth Inlet to 
South Lake Worth Inlet (SAJ) 9-48, 9-52 
Palm Beach, FL side channel and basin (SAJ) 9-51 
Palm Beach Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-11, 9-31, 9-43 
Palm Beach Island, FL (SAJ) 9-20, 9-34, 9-50 
Palouse River, WA (NPW) 39-17 
Pamunkey River, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-16 
Panacea Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-49, 10-50 
Panama City Beaches, FL (SAM) 10-44 
Panama City Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-13, 10-32, 10-43 
Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Panther Creek, KY (Green River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 
Panther Creek, Sangamon River, Chandlerville, IL 
(NCR) 23-16 
Panther Creek, WV (ORH) 17-23 
Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE (MRO) 
26-6, 26-16, 26-22 
Parish Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Park City, KS (SWT) 29-28 
Park River, Hartford, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-63 
Park Row Bridge, Arlington, TX (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 
Parker Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Parker Lake, OK (SWT) 29-9, 29-19, 29-24 
Parkersburg, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
Parrots Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Pascagoula Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-14, 10-32, 10-43 
Pascagoula River, MS (SAM) 10-49 
Pasquotank River, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Pass-A-Grille Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 
Pass Christian Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-49 
Pass Manchac, LA (LMN) 11-14 
Passaic River Basin, N.J. & NY (NAN) 2-13, 2-18, 
2-22 
Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME (NED) 1-57 
Pat Mayse Lake, TX (SWT) 29-9, 29-19, 29-24 
Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA (NPW) 39-16 
Patchogue River, CT (NED) 1-51, 1-61 
Patoka Lake, IN (ORL) 16-10, 16-16, 16-31 
Patoka River, Jasper, IN (ORL) 16-34 
Patoka River, Winslow, IN (ORL) 16-34 
Patriot, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO (MRK) 27-17 
Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO 1-35 Highway 
Relocation Town Relocation (MRK) 27-18 
Patuxent River, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Paw Paw Lake, MI (NCE) 21-96 
Pawcatuck, CT (NED) 1-56 
Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI & CT 
(NED) 1-59 
Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch 
Hill Cove, RI & CT (NED) 1-51 
I-50

Pawcatuck River, RI & CT (uncompleted portion) 
(NED) 1-59 
Pawtucket, RI (NED) 1-59 
Pawtuxet Cove, RI (NED) 1-51 
Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI (NED) 1-56, 1-62 
Pax, WV (ORH) 17-24 
Paxton Creek, Harrisburg, PA (NAB) 4-15, 4-28, 4-38 
Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID (NPW) 
39-16 
Payette Valley, ID (NPW) 39-17 
Peachtree Creek, Basin, Atlanta, GA (SAM) 10-52 
Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA (SAS) 8-22 
Pearl River Basin, MS and LA (LMK) 12-6, 12-12 
Pearl River, Jackson-East Jackson, MS (LMK) 12-21 
Pearl River, MS (LMK) 12-16 
Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA (LMK) 
12-7, 12-10, 12-13 
Pearson-Skubitz Bill Hill Lake, KS (SWT) 29-9, 29-19, 
29-24 
Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE (MRO) 26-7, 26-17, 26-22 
Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI (NCR) 23-14 
Peconic River (NAN) 2-27 
Pecos, TX (SWA) 32-18 
Peekskill Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27 
Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL 
(NCR) 23-12, 23-15 
Pelican Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Pelican Lake, Frankfort, MN (NCS) 24-30 
Pembina, ND (NCS) 24-29 
Pembina River Lake, ND (NCS) 24-28 
Pembina River, ND (NCS) 24-26 
Pembroke Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR 
(NPP) 37-39, 37-41, 37-43 
Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Penitentiary Jones Run, KY (ORL) 16-35 
Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCC) 
23-15 
Penny Slough, Rock River, IL (NCR) 23-12 
Penobscot River, ME (NED) 1-51, 1-56 
Pensacola Bay, FL to Mobile Bay, AL (SAM) 10-42 
Pensacola Beach, FL (SAM) 10-52 
Pensacola Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-15, 10-32, 10-44, 
10-52 
Pensacola Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 
Pensaukee Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-27, 21-65, 21-84 
Pentwater Harbor, MI (1892 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 
Pentwater Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-28, 21-65, 21-84 
Peoria, IL (NCR) 23-13 
Pepin Harbor, WI 25-7 
Pepper Creek, DE (NAP) 3-27 
Pepperell Cove, ME (NED) 1-51 
Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 
1-59 
Percosin Creek and Tributaries, GA (SAM) 10-57 
Perdido Pass Channel, AL (SAM) 10-15, 10-32, 10-44 
Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME (NED) 1-24, 1-39, 1-48 
Perley, MN (NCS) 24-32 
Permanent International Association of Navigation 
Congresses 47-1 
Permit Evaluation (SAJ) 9-26 
Perquimans River, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-30 
Perry County Drainage and Levee District Nos. 1, 2 
and 3, MO (LSM) 14-16 
Perry Creek, IA (MRO) 26-7, 26-17, 26-22 
Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS (MRK) 
27-17, 27-20 
Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS (MRK) 27-5, 27-12, 
27-15 
Perry Road, Hutton Br., Carroll, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Perryville, KY (ORL) 16-28 
Perth Amboy, NJ (NAN) 2-32 
Petaluma River, CA (SPN) 34-8 
Petersburg Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Petersburg, WV (NAB) 4-16, 4-28, 4-38 
Petit Jean River, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA (LMN) 
11-14 
Petoskey Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 
Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
Peyton Creek, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Phillippi Creek Basin, FL (SAJ) 9-52 
Phillips Lake, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-65 
Philpott Lake, VA (SAW) 6-16, 6-22 
Phoenix, AZ and Vicinity (Including New River)(Stage 
2 and Remaining Work) (SPL) 33-8, 33-19, 33-32 
Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City 
District) (MRK) 27-6, 27-15 
Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha 
District) (MRO), 26-7, 26-17, 26-22, 26-32 
Pickens County, AL (SAM) 10-57 
Pierce, NE (MRO) 26-22, 26-26. 
I-51

Pig Island Gut, ME (NED) 1-51 
Pilchuck River, Everett, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA 
(NPS) 38-28 
Pilchuck River, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Pillar Point Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-8 
Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Pinal Creek Channel Improvements (SPL) 33-37 
Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River 
Basin, NV (SPL) 33-8, 33-19, 33-32 
Pine Bluff, AR, local protection (LMK) 12-18 
Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN (NCS) 24-25 
Pine Creek, AZ (SPL) 33-32 
Pine Creek Lake, TX (SWT) 29-9, 29-19, 29-24 
Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (SPK) 35-17, 
35-30 
Pine Ford Lake, MO (LSM) 14-5, 14-8 
Pine Mountain Lake, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Pine River, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 
Pinellas County, FL (SAJ) 9-20, 9-34, 9-50 
Pineville, KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 
Pineville, Red River, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 
Pinole Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Pinole Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 
Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, CO (Sec. 212) (SWA) 
32-18 
Pinopolis Dam, SC (SAN) 7-9, 7-13, 7-19 
Pioneer Lake, KS (MRK) 27-18 
Pipe Creek, Alexandria, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Pipestem Lake, ND (MRO) 26-8, 26-17, 26-23 
Pipestone Creek at Pipestone, MN (MRO) 26-30 
Pithlachascotee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Pittsburgh Harbor, PA (ORP) 18-21 
Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) (ORP) 18-24 
Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) (ORP) 18-24 
Pittsburgh, PA (The Strip) (ORP) 18-24 
Pittsfield, MA (NED) 1-64 
Placer Creek, ID (NPS) 38-28 
Plainview Road Bridge, Chester County, TN (LMM) 
13-5 
Planning and Engineering (SWG) 31-18 
Planning, Engineering and Design (NED) 1-31 
Plants Creek, Seymour, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE (MRO) 
26-22 
Platte River and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-22 
Platte River, Ashland, NE (MRO) 26-27 
Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville, NE (MRO) 
26-26 
Platte River, Brady, NE (MRO) 26-26 
Platte River, Ginger Cove Near Valley, NE (MRO) 
26-27 
Platte River, Hansen-Chris Lakes, Bellevue, NE 
(MRO) 26-26 
Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island, NE 
(MRO) 26-26 
Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement (MRK) 27-17 
Platte River near Schuyler, NE (MRO) 26-22 
Platte River, Near North Bend, NE (MRO) 26-27 
Plattsburgh Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27 
Pleasant Bay, MA (NED) 1-59 
Pleasant Creek, Greenwood, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Pleasant Point, Perry, ME (NED) 1-56 
Pleasant River, ME (NED) 1-51 
Pleasanton, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Plum Creek at New Haven Township, MN (NCS) 
24-29 
Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora, CO (MRO) 
26-26 
Plum Creek, Johnston, NE (MRO) 26-27 
Plum Creek, Norden Dam Access Road, NE (MRO) 
26-25 
Plum Creek, Oakmont, PA (construction) (ORP) 18-30 
Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY (ORL) 16-33 
Plum Island, MA (NED) 1-54 
Plum Island Waste Treatment Plant, SC (SAW) 7-24 
Plymouth Harbor, MA (NED) 1-9, 1-34, 1-47 
Plymouth, PA (NAB) 4-38 
Poca, WV (ORH) 17-23 
Pocomoke River, MD (1945 River & Harbor Act) 
(NAB) 4-40 
Pocomoke River, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) 
(NAB) 4-40 
Pocomoke River, MD (NAB) 4-9, 4-26, 4-35 
Pocotaligo River, Manning, SC (SAN) 7-24 
Pogues Run, Indianapolis, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 
Point Beach, Milford, CT (NED) 1-61 
Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI (NED) 
1-9, 1-34, 1-47 
Point Judith, RI (NED) 1-59 
Point Lookout Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-28, 21-66, 21-84 
Point Place, Toledo, OH (NCB) 20-44 
I-52

Point Remove Levee and Drainage District, Conway 
County, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Point Shirley, Winthrop, MA (NED) 1-26, 1-41, 1-51 
Pole Cat Creeks, Lacoste, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA (NED) 1-51 
Poloa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 
Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, MT (NPS) 38-26 
Pomeroy, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Pomme de Terre Lake (Power Addition), MO (MRK) 
27-19 
Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 
(MRK) 27-6, 27-12, 27-16, 27-22 
Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS 
(MRK) 27-6, 27-12, 27-16 
Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, (MRK) 27-20 
Pompion Hill, SC (SAN) 7-21 
Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-11, 9-31, 9-43 
Ponce Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-11, 9-31, 9-43 
Ponce, PR (SAJ) 9-50 
Pond Creek, Cheatham County, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Pontiac Diversion, RI (NED) 1-59 
Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT (NED) 1-56 
Port Alexander (Inner Harbor), AK (NPA) 40-16 
Port Alexander, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 
Port Angeles Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Port Arthur and Vicinity (Hurricane Flood Protection), 
TX (SWG) 31-15,31-22, 31-38 
Port Austin Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-29, 21-66, 21-85 
Port Bay, NY 1950 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 
Port Chester Harbor (NAN) 2-26, 2-27, 2-32 
Port Clinton Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-7, 20-18, 20-37 
Port Dickerson, NY (NAB) 4-44 
Port Everglades Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-12, 9-32, 9-43 
Port Gamble Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Port Hueneme, CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-15, 33-26 
Port Jefferson Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27, 2-32 
Port Lions, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 
Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-5, 40-10, 
40-13 
Port of Gold Beach, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Port of Kalama, WA (NPP) 37-39 
Port Ontario Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-10, 20-24, 20-42 
Port Orchard Bay, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Port Orford, OR (NPP) 37-8, 37-26, 37-34 
Port Royal Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-6, 7-12, 7-18 
Port San Luis, CA (SPL) 33-35 
Port Sanilac Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-29, 21-66, 21-85 
Port St. Joe, FL (SAM) 10-49 
Port Townsend, WA (NPS) 38-26, 38-31 
Port Washington Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-29, 21-67, 
21-85 
Port Wing Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-30, 21-67, 21-85 
Portage Lake Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-30, 21-67, 21-85 
Portage, PA (ORP) 18-22 
Portage, WI (NCS) 24-12, 24-23 
Porter Bayou, MS (LMK) 12-7, 12-10, 12-13 
Portersville Bay-East, Mobile County, AL (SAM) 
10-20, 10-34, 10-45 
Portersville Bay-West, Mobile County, AL (SAM) 
10-20, 10-34, 10-45 
Portland Harbor, ME (NED) 1-51 
Portland, IN (Salamonie River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 
Portland, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID Pocatello Unit 
(NPW) 39-17 
Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek, ID (NPW) 39-17 
Portsmouth Harbor, VA Channel to Nansemond 
Ordinance Depot, (NAO) 5-16 
Portsmouth-New Boston, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR (SAJ) 9-24, 9-35, 
9-52 
Portville, NY (ORP) 18-22 
Post Oak Creek, Corsicana, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Posten Bayou, AR and LA (LMK) 12-19, 12-22 
Poteau River Navigation Project, OK and AR (SWT) 
29-25 
Poteet, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and 
Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-9, 4-27, 4-35 
Potomac River and Tributaries at and below 
Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut 
(NAB) 4-36 
Potomac River - Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC 
(NAB) 4-8, 4-24,4-31 
Potomac River at Alexandria, VA (NAB) 4-8, 4-24, 
4-32 
Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA (NAB) 4-36 
Potomac River at North Side of Washington Channel, 
DC (NAB) 4-36 
Potomac River Below Washington, DC (NAB) 4-36 
Potowomut River, RI (NED) 1-51 
Pottstown, PA (NAP) 3-29 
1-53

Poverty Point, LA (LMK) 12-22 
Powder Horn Branch, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-24 
Powder River, Arvada, WY (MRO) 26-20 
Powder River, Broadus, MT (MRO) 26-30 
Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT (NPS) 
38-28 
Power Plant Road, Guam (POD) 36-11 
Powhaten Point, OH (ORP) 18-24 
Prairie du Chien Harbor, WI 25-7 
Prairie du Chien, WI (NCS) 24-26 
Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL (LSM) 
14-16 
Prairie du Pont Rocher and Vicinity, IL (LSM) 14-16 
Prattville, Autauga Creek, AL (SAM) 10-50 
Preconstruction Engineering and Design - See Advance 
Engineering and Design 
Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Presque Isle Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-30, 21-68, 21-85 
Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA (NCB) 20-14, 20-26, 
20-45 
Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME (NED) 1-56 
Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-16, 
14-17 
Prestonsburg, KY (ORH) 17-24 
Prestonvilie, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, 
Baltimore Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-10, 4-27, 4-35 
Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA (NPS) 38-29 
Princeton, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 
(NPP) 37-41 
Pringle Creek, OR (NPP) 37-43 
Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA (SAM) 10-21, 10-35, 
10-46 
Proctor Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 
Proctor, WV (ORP) 18-24 
Proctorville, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Project Condition Surveys 
Alaska District (NPA) 40-5, 40-19 
Portland District (NPP) 37-8 
Seattle District (NPS) 38-6 
Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 
(SAS) 8-9 (SWG) 31-17 (NCE) 21-41, (SAN) 7- 
10, (NCB) 20-17, (ORP) 18-12, (MRO) 26-10, 
26-40 
Projects Specifically Authorized Under the Former 
California Debris Commission 35-1A 
Prompton Lake, PA (NAP) 3-15, 3-21, 3-27 
Prospect Beach, West Haven CT (NED) 1-14, 1-37, 
1-49 
Prosperity Lake, MO (SWL) 28-23 
Prototype Breakwater Test Program, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Providence River and Harbor, RI (uncompleted 
portion) (NED) 1-59 
Providence River and Harbor, RI (NED) 1-51 
Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA (NED) 1-59 
Provincetown Harbor, MA (NED) 1-10, 1-35, 1-47 
Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 
(NED) 1-59 
Pt. Pleasant, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
Pudding River, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Pueblo, Arkansas River, CO (Floodway levee 
extension) (SWA) 32-18 
Puerco River, Gallup, NM (SWA) 32-18 
Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA (NPS) 
38-6, 38-16, 38-23 
Pullman, Palouse River, WA (NPW) 39-17 
Pultneyville Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-42 
Pumpkinville Creek, Emerson, GA (SAM) 10-50 
Punaluu Highway, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-11 
Pungo Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Pungo River, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Punxsatawney, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-5, 
18-13, 18-18 
Punxsutawney, PA (ORP) 18-22 
Put in Bay, OH (NCB) 20-42 
Puyallup River, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Pysht River, Sekiu, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Q 
Quail Wash Levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino, CA 
(SPL) 33-37 
Queens Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Queenstown Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA 
(NPS) 38-28 
Quillayute River (Uncompleted portion), WA (NPS) 
38-30 
Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, 
WA (NPS) 38-28 
Quillayute River, WA (NPS) 38-6, 38-16, 38-23 
Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-28 
I-54

Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA (NPS) 
38-28 
Quinby Creek, VA (NAO) 5-22 
Quince Road Bridge, Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-3, 13-5 
Quincy Harbor, IL 25-8 
Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel (NCR) 23-11 
Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy MA (NED) 1-54 
Quonset Point, Davisville, RI (NED) 1-26, 1-41, 1-51 
R 
R.B. West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, 
Near Malvern, IA (MRO) 26-27 
R.D. Bailey Lake, WV (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19 
Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA (SAM) 10-21, 10-35, 
10-46 
Raccoon Creek Levee, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Raccoon Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-9, 3-19, 3-24 
Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-16 
Racine Harbor, WI (1945 R&H Act and Section 107 of 
the 1960 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 
Racine, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Rahway, NJ (NAN) 2-30 
Rahway River, NJ (NAN) 2-32 
Rainmaker Hotel, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 
Ralston & Leydon Creeks, CO (MRO) 26-28 
Ramapo River, Monroe 
Rancocas River, NJ (NAP) 3-30 
Randleman Lake, NC (SAW) 6-11, 6-22 
Ranier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 
37-39, 37-40 
Rapid City,. Cedar Canyon Dam, SD (MRO) 26-25 
Rapid Creek, ID (NPW) 39-16 
Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD (MRO) 26-22, 26-25 
Rapidan River, Orange, VA (NAO) 5-17 
Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, VA (NAO) 
5-16 
Rappahannock River, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook, NJ (NAN) 2-30 
Raritan River (NAN) 2-26, 2-27, 2-32 
Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cut-Off Channel, NJ 
(NAN) 2-27 
Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA (MRK) 27-6, 27-13, 
27-16 
Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery (MRK) 27-17 
Ray Roberts Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-17, 30-20 
Raymondville Drain, TX (SWG) 31-14 
Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA 
(NAB) 4-16, 4-29, 4-38 
Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 
Baltimore District (NAB) 4-11, 4-46 
Buffalo District (NCB) 20-13 
Charleston District (SAN) 7-7 
Chicago District (NCC) 22-6 
Detroit District (NCE) 21-42 
Galveston District (SWG) 31-10 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10-52 
New England Division (NED) 1-14, 1-71 
New York District (NAN) 2-10, 2-23 
Norfolk District (NAO) 5-17 
Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-2 
Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 
San Francisco District (SPN) 34-6 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-6 
Wilmington District (SAW) 6-28 
Red Arroyo, San Angelo, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Red Bluff, CA (SPK) 35-41 
Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, MA (NED) 1-52 
Red Creek, NY 1966 FC Act (NCB) 20-47 
Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN (NCS) 24-25 
Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
Red Lake River at Hout, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN (NCS) 24-26, 
24-31 
Red Lake River, MN including Clearwater River, MN 
(NCS) 24-12, 24-23 
Red Lake River, Polk County, Crookston, MN (NCS) 
24-13, 24-23, 24-33 
Red River at East Grand Forks (NCS) 24-30 
Red River at Grand Forks (NCS) 24-30 
Red River Bank Stabilization below Denison, OK and 
TX (SWT) 29-26 
Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX and OK (SWT) 
29-4, 29-14 
Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank 
stabiliation (Vicksburg District) (LMK) 12-8, 
12-10, 12-13 
Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) 
(LMK) 12-7, 12-18, 12-19 
Red River below Denison Dam including Little River 
Basin, OK and AR (SWL) 28-19 
Red River below Fulton, AR (LMK) 12-16 
Red River, Clay City, KY (ORL) 16-38 
I-55

Red River Emergency Bank Protection (LMK) 12-2, 
12-9, 12-11 
Red River from Fulton, AR to Mouth of Washita River 
(SWT) 29-25 
Red River, Hwy 71, Little River County, AR (SWL) 
28-9, 28-16 
Red River, Hwy. 31, Little River County, AR (SWL) 
28-22 
Red River, 130, Little River County, AR (SWL) 28-9, 
28-16, 28-19 
Red River in Vicinity of Shreveport, LA (LMK) 12-20, 
12-22 
Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-24, 
16-32 
Red River of the North, MN and ND (NCS) 24-25 
Red River of the North at Fargo, ND - Moorhead, MN 
(NCS) 24-26 
Red River of the North at Pembina, ND (NCS) 24-26, 
24-31 
Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN (NCS) 
24-26 
Red River of the North, Oxbow, ND (NCS) 24-32 
Red River of the North, Grand Marais Outlet, MN 
(NCS) 24-32 
Red River of the North at Oslo, MN (NCS) 24-26, 
24-31 
Red River of the North at Argusville, ND (NCS) 24-26 
Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD and 
ND (NCS) 24-13, 24-23 
Red River of the North at Halstad, MN (NCS) 24-26 
Red River of the North, Grand Forks, ND (NCS) 
24-31, 24-32 
Red River Parish, LA (LMK) 12-22 
Red River, TN (ORN) 15-13 
Red River Waterway, LA (LMK) 12-14 
Red River Waterway, LA, AR, OK and TX (LMK) 
12-16 
Red River-Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, 
LA (LMK) 12-2, 12-9, 12-11 
Red River-Waterway-Shreveport, LA to Index, AR 
(LMK) 12-8, 12-11, 12-14 
Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, 
TX (LMK) 12-16 
Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA (NCR) 23-5, 
23-7, 23-10 
Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI (1970 Flood 
Control Act) (NCE) 21-98 
Red Wing Harbor, MN 25-7 
Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-18, 35-31 
Redbank Creek Lake, PA (ORP) 18-24 
Redbird Creek, O'Neill, NE (MRO) 26-27 
Reddick Run, Essex Township, IA (NCR) 23-16 
Reddies River Lake, NC (SAW) 6-30 (SAN) 7-21 
Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA (SPL) 
33-4, 33-15, 33-26, 33-36 
Redstone Creek, Redstone, PA (ORP) 18-30 
Redwater River and Hay Creek, Belle Fourche, SD 
(MRO) 26-23 
Redwood City Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-8 
Redwood Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 
Redwood River below Marshall, MN (NCS) 24-26, 
24-31 
Redwook Creek, Humboldt County, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 
36-10 
Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR (NPP) 37-39 
Reedy River, SC (SAN) 7-21, 7-22 
Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV (SPK) 35-39 
Reevesville, IL (Cache River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 
16-33 
Regulatory Functions Program 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-28 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 
St. Paul District (NCS) 24-20 
Regulatory Program (MRK) 27-9 
Regulatory Sunken Vessel Removal & National 
Emergency Preparedness 50-1 
Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, DE (NAP) 3-30 
Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in 
the State of Florida, (SAJ) 9-12, 9-32, 9-44 
Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA (LMN) 11-14 
Removal of Sunken Vessels (SPN) 34-8 
Removing of snags and wrecks from Mississippi River 
below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and 
Atchafalaya Rivers (LMK) 12-16 
Removing of snags and wrecks from Mississippi River 
below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and 
Atchafalaya Rivers (LMM) 13-4 
Removing Water Hyacinths (SAM) 10-49 
Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL (LSM) 14-12, 14-16 
Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, OH (NCB) 20-15, 
20-27, 20-45 
Republican River, NE and KS (MRK) 27-20 
Research and Development 
I-56

Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 
Sacramento District (SPK) 35-26 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 
Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN 
(NCS) 24-2, 24-21, 24-25 
Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, OR 
(NPP) 37-41 
Revere Beach, MA (NED) 1-12, 1-34, 1-40 
Rexhame Dunes, Marshfield, MA 1-60 
Reynoldsville, PA (ORP) 18-22 
Rheem Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Rheem Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 
Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD (NAB) 4-10, 4-27, 4-35 
Rice Creek, FL (SAJ) 9-51 
Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC 
(Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) 
(SAS) 8-10, 8-14, 8-21 
Richland Creek, IL (LSM) 14-17 
Richland Creek, Morgantown, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Richland Lake, MO (MRK) 27-19 
Richmond Filtration Plant, VA (NAO) 5-11, 5-15 
Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA (SPN) 34-2, 
34-10, 34-13 
Richmond Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 
Richmond Local Flood Protection, VA (NAO) 5-10, 
5-19 
Richmond's Island Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 
Richwood and Fenwick, WV (ORH) 17-24 
Ridgecrest, Kern County, CA SPL) 33-37 
Ridgeley, WV (NAB) 4-45 
Ridgeway & Vicinity (on Clarion River) (ORP) 18-23 
Ridgeway, PA (Elk Creek) (ORP) 18-22 
Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY (ORH) 
17-24 
Rillito River, AZ (SPL) 33-9, 33-19, 33-32 
Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta, Santiago, PR (SAJ) 9-63 
Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR (SAJ) 9-63 
Rio Coamo, Parcelas Velezquez, PR (SAJ)9-63 
Rio Culebrinas, Aguada, PR (SAJ) 9-63 
Rio De La Plata, PR (SAJ) 9-5, 9-35, 9-52 
Rio Grande Basin, NM (SWA) 32-4 32-12, 32-14 
Rio Grande de Loiza, PR (SAJ) 9-50 
Rio Grande Floodway, NM (SWA) 32-6, 32-13, 32-15, 
32-16 
Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del 
Apache Unit, NM (SWA) 32-7, 32-13, 32-15 
Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR (SAJ) 9-25, 9-35, 9-52 
Ripley, OH (ORH) 17-22, 17-24 
Ririe Lake, ID (NPW) 39-16 
Rising Sun, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
River des Peres, MO (LSM) 14-6, 14-12 
River Rouge, MI (NCE) 21-86 
Riverdale, West Springfield, MA (NED) 1-20, 1-39, 
1-67 
Riverland Levee District, MO (LSM) 14-17 
Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds (SAM) 10-29 
Riverside Area, Pasco, WA (NPW) 39-16 
Riverside Levees (SPL) 33-37 
Riverview, WV (ORH) 17-22 
Roanoak Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Roanoke Island, Dare County, NC (SAW) 6-34 
Roanoke River, 50-mile long Channel from Palmyra 
Landing to Weldon (SAW) 6-31 
Roanoke River Basin, VA and NC (SAW) 6-16, 6-33 
Roanoke River, NC (SAW) 6-7, 6-21 
Roanoke River Upper Basin, VA Headwaters Area 
(SAW) 6-14, 6-21 
Roaring River Lake, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Roaring River, Wilkes County, NC (SAN) 7-21 
Roaring Springs Road, Bridge, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX (SWF) 30-12, 
30-17, 30-21 
Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-26, 
10-35 
Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (SWL) 28-26 
Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK 
(SWT) 29-12, 29-21, 29-25 
Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash 
River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 
Rochester Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-11, 20-24, 20-43 
Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA (NCR) 23-14 
Rochester, MN (NCS) 24-14, 24-23 
Rochester, PA (ORP) 18-24 
Rock Creek, Granite County, MT (NPS) 38-28 
Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT (NPS) 38-28 
Rock Creek Road, MT (NPS) 38-28 
Rock Creek, Unicoi County, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Rock Hall Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Rock Island Harbor, IL 25-7 
Rock Island, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 
Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL (NCR) 23-13 
Rock River at Rock Rapids, MT (MRO) 26-30 
Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island) NY 
(NAN) 2-12, 2-17, 2-22 
I-57

Rockfish Creek, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Rockford, IL (NCR) 23-12 
Rockland Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 
Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 
1-59 
Rockland Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Rockport and Old Harbors, Rockport, MA (NED) 1-52 
Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove, Rockport, MA 
(NED) 1-52 
Rockport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 
Rockport, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Rocky Creek and Basie Branch, MS (SAM) 10-57 
Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 
23-12 
Rocky Pass, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Rocky River, OH (NCB) 20-11, 20-24, 20-43 
Rocy Fork, OH (ORH) 17-23 
Rodeo Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Rodeo Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 
Rogers City Harbor, MI (1910 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 
Rogue River Fisheries Habitat, OR (NPP) 37-43 
Rogue River, Grants Pass, OR (NPP) 37-17, 37-29, 
3-36, 
Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR (NPP) 37-8, 
37-26, 37-34 
Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 
28-22 
Rolling Fork, Lebanon Junction, KY (ORL) 16-35 
Rolling Fork River, Sevier County, AR (SWL) 28-22 
Rollinson Channel, NC (SAW) 6-7, 6-20 
Rome, Coosa River, GA (SAM) 10-50 
Rome, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Rome Mohawk River, NY (NAN) 2-32 
Rondout Harbor (NAN) 2-27 
Root Creek, Bolivar, NY (ORP) 18-22 
Root River at Hokah, MN (NCS) 24-26 
Rose Creek Channel Improvements, San Diego, CA 
(SPL) 33-37 
Roseau River, MN (NCS) 24-14, 24-23, 24-33 
Rosedale Harbor, MS (LMK) 12-16 
Rosendale, NY (NAN) 2-30 
Roseville, OH (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19, 17-24 
Rosiclaire, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 
Rossview Lake, TN and KY (ORN) 15-14 
Rota Harbor, CNMI (POD) 36-7 
Rouge River, MI (1935 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 
Rouge River, MI (1958 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 
Rouge River, MI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 
Rouge River, MI (NCE) 21-31, 21-68, 21-85 
Rough River, KY (ORL) 16-22, 16-28, 16-33 
Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY 
(ORL) 16-10, 16-17 
Roughans Point, Revere, MA (NED) 1-26, 1-41, 1-51 
Roundhouse Bridge, Amory, MS (SAM) 10-52 
Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, NY (NAN) 2-28 
Rouseville, PA (ORP) 18-23 
Route 418, Lyon County, KS (SWT) 29-29 
Route 531, Lake Erie, Ashtabula City, OH (NCB) 
20-46 
Rowlesburg Lake, WV (ORP) 18-23 
Royal River, ME (NED) 1-10, 1-35, 1-47 
Rudee Inlet, VA (NAO) 5-7, 5-14, 5-18 
Ruffy Brook, MN (NCS) 24-28 
Rush Creek, Arlington, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Rush River (NCS) 24-30 
Rushford, MN (NCS) 24-26 
Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 
16-24, 16-28 
Russell Creek, SC (SAN) 7-22 
Russell, KY (ORH) 17-21 
Russian River Basin, CA (SPK) 35-19, 35-31, 35-36, 
35-43 
Russian River, CA (SPN) 34-14 
Russian River Channel Improvements (East Fork) 
(SPK) 35-44 
Rutland Otter Creek, VT (NAN) 2-32 
Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, 
TX (SWF) 30-22 
Rye Creek, MT (NPS) 38-28 
Rye Harbor, NH (NED) 1-52 
S 
Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (SWG) 31-8, 31-21, 
31-34, 31-41, 31-44, 31-49 
Sabine River and Tributaries (Echo to Morgan Bluff), 
TX (SWG) 31-37 
Sabula, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 
Sackets Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-42, 20-47 
Saco, MT (MRO) 26-22, 26-24 
Saco River, ME (NED) 1-11, 1-35, 1-48 
Saco River ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 
I-58

Sacramento River and Tributaries from Collinsville to 
Shasta Dam, CA (SPK) 35-20, 35-31, 35-37, 
35-44, 35-45, 35-2A, 35-6A 
Sacramento River, CA (SPK) 35-2, 35-28, 35-36, 35- 
41, 35-3A, 35-6A, 35-9A 
Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA 
(SPK) 35-3, 35-28 
Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD (MRO) 26-22, 
26-25 
Sag Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-28, 2-32 
Sagamore Marsh, Cape Cod Canal, MA (NED) 1-61 
Saginaw River, MI (NCE) 21-43, 21-72, 21-89 
Saipan Beach Road, CNMI (POD) 36-8 
Saipan Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-10 
Saipan Small Boat Harbor, CNMI (POD) 36-7 
Sakonnet Harbor, RI (NED) 1-11, 1-35, 1-48 
Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) (NED) 
1-59 
Sakonnet River, RI (NED) 1-52 
Salamanca, NY (ORP) 18-22 
Salamonie Lake, IN (ORL) 16-10, 16-17 
Salamonie River, Wells County, IN (ORL) 16-33 
Salem Harbor, MA (NED) 1-52, 1-61 
Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 
Salem River, NJ (NAP) 3-8, 3-19, 3-25 
Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 
Salinas River, CA (SPK) 35-36, 35-39 
Saline Point, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-22 
Saline River & Tributaries, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 
Saline River, AR (LMK) 12-16 
Salisbury, CT (NED) 1-58 
Salkahatchie River, SC (SAN) 7-20 
Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA (NPP) 37-40 
Salmon River, AK (NPA) 40-16 
Salmon River, Colchester, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-63 
Salmon River, ID (NWP) 39-17 
Salmon River, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Salt Bayou, McFadden Range, TX (SWG) 31-18, 31-23 
Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-8, 26-17, 
26-24 
Salt Creek Levees, Lincoln, NE (MRO) 26-30 
Salt Creek, OH (ORH) 17-23 
Salt Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, Lincoln, NE 
(MRO) 26-27 
Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT (SPK) 35-39 
Saluda River, SC (SAN) 7-21 
Salyersville, KY (ORL) 16-4, 16-14, 16-20, 16-28 
Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX (SWF) 30-12, 
30-17, 30-20 
Sam Rayburn Spillway (Dam Safety Assurance), TX 
(SWF) 30-12, 30-17, 30-20 
Sammamish River Restoration, WA (NPS) 38-10, 
38-18, 38-24, 38-29 
San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-9, 
30-17, 30-20 
San Antonio Floodway, TX (SWF) 30-22 
San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA (SPL) 33-36 
San Diego Creek, Alice, TX (SWG) 31-37 
San Diego Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-15, 33-26 
San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River 
Basin, CA (SPL) 33-37 
San Diego River & Mission Bay, CA (SPL) 33-5, 
33-16, 33-27 
San Francisco Bay-Delta Model Structure, CA (SPN) 
34-4 34-8 
San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy 
(LTMS), CA (SPN) 34-5, 34-10 
San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin 
and Stockton Ship Channels) (SPN) 34-3, 34-10 
San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin 
and Stockton Ship Channels), CA (SPK) 35-3, 
35-28 
San Francisco Harboor (SPN) 34-8 
San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA (SPN) 34-13 
San Francisco Harbor and Bay (Removal of Drift) 
(SPN) 34-8 
San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA (SPN) 
34-13 
San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and 
Newport Beach), Orange County, CA (SPL) 
33-36 
San Gabriel River, TX (SWF) 30-9, 30-17, 30-20 
San Jacinto River Levee & Bautista Creek Channel 
(SPL) 33-37 
San Joaquin River, CA (SPK) 35-4, 35-28, 35-42 
San Juan Dam (SPL) 33-40 
San Juan Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-14, 9-32, 9-45 
San Juan, PR (SAJ) 9-52 
San Leandro Creek (SPN) 34-14 
San Leandro Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 
San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA (SPN) 34-9, 
34-13 
San Leandro River, CA (SPK) 34-35 
I-59

San Lorenzo Creek (Upper Portion), CA (SPN) 34-13 
San Lorenzo Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 
San Lorenzo River, CA (SPK) 35-39 
San Lorenzo River, CA (SPN) 34-14 
San Luis Rey River, CA (SPL) 33-10, 33-20, 33-34 
San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (SPN) 34-9 
San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait (Approaches to 
Vallejo and South Vallejo), CA (SPN) 34-13 
San Pablo Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 
San Rafael Canal, CA (SPN) 34-9 
San Rafael Creek, CA (SPN) 34-9 
Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME (NED) 1-56 
Sand Creek LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 
Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI (NED) 1-54 
Sand Hill River (NCS) 24-30 
Sand Island, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 
Sand Island Shore Protection, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 
Sand Lake, OK (SWT) 29-26 
Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, NY (NAN) 2-30 
Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI (NCS) 24-15, 24-23 
Sandusky Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-12, 20-25, 20-43 
Sandusky River, OH (NCB) 20-42 
Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA (NED) 
1-52 
Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) 
(NED) 1-59 
Sandy Creek, Jackson, TN (LMM) 13-5 
Sandy Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo (NAN) 2-28 
Sandy Hook Bay, NJ (NAN) 2-28 
Sandy Hook Channel (NAN) 2-26 
Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, N.J. (NAN) 2-12, 2-18, 
2-22, 2-29 
Sandy Point Outfall, West Haven, CT (NED) 1-14, 
1-37, 1-49 
Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR (NPP) 37-16, 
37-29, 37-36, 37-43 
Sangamon River (Mouth), IL (NCR) 23-12 
Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL (NCR) 23-15 
Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK (SWT) 29-27 
Santa Ana River Basin and Orange County, CA (SPL) 
33-9, 33-19, 33-32 
Santa Ana River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-37, 33-40 
Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA (SPL) 33-9, 33-19, 
33-32 
Santa Barbara Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-16, 33-28 
Santa Clara River Levee Improvement, Santa Clara 
River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-37 
Santa Cruz, AZ (SPL) 33-32 
Santa Cruz County, CA (SPN) 34-13 
Santa Cruz Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-9 
Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, NM (SWA) 
32-18 
Santa Maria Valley Levees, Santa Maria River Basin, 
CA (SPL) 33-37 
Santa Paula Creek, CA (SPL) 33-10, 33-19, 33-34 
Santa Paula Creek Channel and Debris Basins 
(including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, 
CA (SPL) 33-38 
Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM (SWA) 32-7, 32-13 
Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. 
Clair) (SPL) 33-37 
Santee Dam, SC (SAN) 7-9, 7-14, 7-19 
Santee River, NC & SC (SAN) 7-20 
Sapelo Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-21 
Sarasota County, FL (SAJ) 9-21, 9-34, 9-50 
Sardis Lake, OK (SWT) 29-10, 29-19, 29-24 
Sardis, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Sasanoa River, ME (NED) 1-52 
Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT (NED) 1-54 
Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI (NCE) 
21-36, 21-70, 21-87 
Saugerties Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-28 
Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA (NED) 1-60 
Saugus River and Tributaries, MA (NED) 1-27, 1-41, 
1-51 
Sauk River, Skagit County, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Sausalito Canal, Richardson Bay, CA (SPN) 34-13 
Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR 
(NPP) 37-39 
Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Savage River Dam, MD (NAB) 4-38 
Savan Gut, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-50 
Savanna Harbor, IL 25-7 
Savannah City Park, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Savannah Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-4, 8-13, 8-18 
Savannah River above Augusta, GA (SAS) 8-21 
Savannah River at Augusta, GA (SAS) 8-21, 
Savannah River Basin, GA and SC Dams and Lakes 
(SAS) 8-23 
Savannah River Basin, GA and SC (SAS) 8-9 
Savannah River Below Augusta, GA (SAS) 8-6, 8-13, 
8-20 
I-60

Saw Mill Run, PA (ORP) 18-22 
SawMill Run Road, Salamanca, NY (construction) 
(ORP) 18-30 
Sawmill Branch, SC (SAN) 7-21 
Sawmill R. Elmsford & Greenburgh, NY (NAN) 2-30 
Saxis Island, VA (NAO) 5-17 
Saxon Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-37, 21-70, 
Saxonville, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-65 
Saylorville Lake, IA (NCR) 23-5, 23-7, 23-10 
Scajaquada Creek, NY (NCB) 20-44, 20-45 
Scammon Bay, AK (NPA) 40-16 
Scappoose Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-39 
Scappoose, OR (NPP) 37-42 
Scarboro River, ME (NED) 1-11, 1-35, 1-48 
Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 
Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-10 
Baltimore District (NAB) 4-23 
Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-11 
Kansas City District (MRK) 27-7, 27-13 
Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-12 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-28 
Omaha District (MRO) 26-9 
Portland District (NPP) 37-17 
Sacramento District (SPK) 35-24 
Seattle District (NPS) 38-11 
Tulsa District (SWT) 29-11 
Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-3 
Wilmington District (SAW) 6-16 
Schuyler, Lost Creek and Platte River, NE (MRO) 
26-26 
Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, PA (NAP) 
3-27 
Schuylkill River, PA (NAP) 3-9, 3-19, 3-25 
Scioto River at Portsmith, OH (ORH) 17-20 
Sciotovile, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Scituate Harbor, MA (NED) 1-11, 1-36, 1-48 
Scott County D&L District, Illinois River, IL (LSM) 
14-17 
Scotts Creek, SC (SAN) 7-21, 7-24 
Scotts Creek, VA (NAO) 5-13 
Scottsville, VA (NAO) 5-17 
Scranton, Buffalo, ND (MRO) 26-25 
Scranton, PA (NAB) 4-38 
Scranton, Lackawanna River, PA (NAB) 4-16, 4-29, 4- 
38 
Scuppernong River, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-31, 6-32 
Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT (NED) 1-15, 1-37, 
1-49 
Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 
23-15 
Searsport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 
Seaside Park, CT (NED) 1-54 
Seattle Harbor (Uncompleted portion), WA (NPS) 
38-30 
Seattle Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-23 
Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME (NED) 1-56 
Sebewaing Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-38 
Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI (NCE) 21-45, 21-73, 
21-89, 21-91 
Seekonk River, RI (NED) 1--12, 1-36, 1-48 
Seldovia Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, NY (NCB) 
20-43, 20-47 
Seneca Falls, NY (NCB) 20-46 
Sepulva Dam, CA (SPL) 33-10, 33-20, 33-34 
Sequatchie River, Marion County, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Sequoyah Hills Park, Knoxville, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Sequoyah Hills Park, Phase II, Knoxville, TN (ORN) 
15-18 
Sergius Whitestone, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, CA (SPL) 
33-38 
Sesuit Harbor, MA (NED) 1-12, 1-36, 1-48 
Seveir River near Redmond, UT (SPK) 35-39 
Sewage Lagoon, Vale, OR (NPW) 39-16 
Sewage Lagoons, Minnehaha Creek, Canton, OK 
(SWT) 29-29 
Sewage Lagoons, North Canadian River (SWT) 29-29 
Sewage Lagoons, Washita River, OK (SWT) 29-29 
Seward Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-5, 40-12, 40-17, 40-19 
Seward Marine Industrial Center AK (NPA) 40-17 
Seward, NE (MRK) 27-17 
Sewerline Protection Valley, AL (SAM) 10-50 
Seymour Creek, Seymour, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Shad Landing State Park, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Shallotte River, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-21 
Shallow Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Shark River, NJ (NAN) 2-28 
Shawnee, OK (SWT) 29-30 
Shawneetown, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-26, 16-30, 16-33 
Sheboygan Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-37, 21-70, 21-88 
Sheburne, NY (NAB) 4-44 
Sheepshead Bay (NAN) 2-28 
1-61

Sheffield Lake Community Park, OH 1962 R&H Act 
(NCB) 20-47 
Sheffield, MA (NED) 1-64 
Sheffield Water Intake, AL (ORN) 15-18 
Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH (NED) 1-56 
Shelby Township, MN (NCS) 24-32 
Shell Creek, County Road Near Columbus, NE (MRO) 
26-27 
Shell Creek, NE (MRO) 26-23 
Shelley Area, Snake River, ID (NPW) 39-17 
Shelton Creek, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Shelton Ditch, Marion County, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH 
(ORP) 18-9, 18-14, 18-21, 18-28 
Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (NCS) 
24-26, 24-31 
Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks, WY (MRO) 
26-25 
Sheridan, OR (NPP) 37-42 
Sheridan, WY (MRO) 26-22 
Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT (NED) 1-54 
Shetucket River, Sprague, CT (NED) 1-61 
Sheyenne River, ND (NCS) 24-15, 24-23, 24-29 
Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND (NCS) 24-26 
Shidler Lake, OK (SWT) 29-26 
Shields River, near Clyde Park, MT (MRO) 26-22 
Shields River, near Livingston (Hwy 89) (MRO) 26-25 
Shields River, Park County, MT (US 89) (MRO) 26-31 
Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Shinnecock Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-8, 2-17, 2-21, 2-23 
Shipyard River, SC (SAN) 7-6, 7-12, 7-18 
Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-28 
Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) (ORL) 16-26 
Shobe Canyon, Heppner, OR (NWP) 39-16 
Shooters Island, NJ & NY (NAN) 2-32 
Short Beach, CT (NED) 1-54 
Short Creek, Connorville, OH (terminated) (ORP) 
18-30 
Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell, WY (MRO) 
26-25 
Shoshone River, Byron, MW (MRO) 26-25 
Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-21 
Shrewsbury River, N.J. (NAN) 2-8, 2-17, 2-21, 2-23 
Shufflebarger Levee, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Shupe Run. Mt. Pleasant, PA (detalied project report 
underway) (ORP) 18-30 
Siasconset Beach, Nantucket, MA (NED) 1-60 
Sid Simpson Project, IL (NCR) 23-12 
Sierra Madre Wash Channel, Los Angeles County 
Drainage Area, CA (SPL) 33-40 
Silver Bay Harbor, MN (NCE) 21-37, 21-70, 21-88 
Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT (NED) 1-54, 1-59, 
1-60 
Silver Creek, Rome, GA (SAM) 10-50 
Silver Lake Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-7, 6-20, 6-25 
Simmons Bay, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Simms Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-16, 31-22, 31-38 
Simpson Creek, SC (SAN) 7-21, 7-21 
Singing Hills Creek, Watauga, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Sinking Creek, Lebanon, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Sioux City, Floyd River, IA (MRO) 26-27 
Sioux.Falls, Big Sioux River, SD (MRO) 26-25 
Sioux Falls, SD (MRO) 26-22 
Sipsey River 
Sisterville, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Sitka Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-5, 40-12, 40-16, 40-17 
Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Siuslaw River, OR (NPP) 37-8, 37-26, 37-34 
Six Bridge Lake, MD & PA (NAB) 4-40 
Six Runs Creek, NC (SAW) 6-31, 6-34 
Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR (SWL) 28-23 
Skagit and Samish Rivers, WA (NPS) 38-31 
Skagit River (Avon Pass), WA (NPS) 38-30 
Skagit River (Levee and Channel Improvements), WA 
(NPS) 38-28 
Skagit River (Uncompleted portion), WA (NPS) 38-30 
Skagit River at Burlington Bend, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA (NPS) 38-28 
Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (NPS) 38-28, 
38-29 
Skagit River, WA (NPS) 38-26, 38-30 
Skagit River, West Mt. Vernon, WA (NPS) 38-31 
Skagway Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 
Skagway River, AK (NPA) 40-16 
Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA (NPP) 37-41 
Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA 
(NPP) 37-39 
Skamokawa Creek, WA (NPP) 37-38, 37-42 
Skiatook Lake, OK (SWT) 29-10, 29-19, 29-24 
Skiatook, OK (SWT) 29-30 
Skipanon Channel, OR (NPP) 37-9, 37-26, 37-34 
Skykomish River, North Fork, Index, WA (NPS) 38-29 
I-62

Slaughter Creek, MD (NAB) 4-9, 4-14, 4-32 
Slovan, PA (ORP) 18-22 
Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL (LSM) 14-17 
Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL (LSM) 14-17 
Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA (NED) 1-56 
Smith Creek, COO (SWA) 32-18 
Smith Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Smith Ferry, PA (ORP) 18-24 
Smith River, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), NC (SAW) 6-28 
Smithfield, WV (ORH) 17-24 
Smithland, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Smithneck Creek, Loyalton, CA (SPK) 35-45 
Smiths Creek (Wilmington), NC (SAW) 6-28 
Smthville Channel, Little Platte River, MO (MRK) 
27-17 
Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO (MRK) 27-6, 
27-13, 27-16 
Smoky Hill, Saline, and Soloman Rivers (MRK) 27-20 
Smyrna River, DE (NAP) 3-27 
Snake River, Alvarado, MN (NCS) 24-16, 24-23 
Snake River, Blackfoot, ID (NPW) 39-16, 39-17 
Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, 
OR, WA and ID (NPW) 39-10, 39-14, 39-19 
Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID (NPW) 39-16 
Snake River, OR (NWP) 39-17 
Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID (NPW) 39-16 
Snake River, Vega/Sandsville, MN (NCS) 24-33 
Snake River, WA (NWP) 39-17 
Snake River, Warren, MN (NCS) 24-33 
Snettisham, AK (NPA) 40-8, 40-14, 40-16 
Snohomish County, Index to Monroe, WA (NPS) 
38-31 
Snohomish River, Lowell-Snohomish River Road, WA 
(NPS) 38-29 
Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA (NPS) 38-29 
Snoqualmie River, WA (NPS) 38-31 
Snoqualmie River, West Snoqualmie, WA (NPS) 38-29 
Sny Basin, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 
Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 
23-15 
Soap Creek, WA (NPP) 37-41 
Socastee Creek, SC (SAN) 7-9, 7-13, 7-18 
Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries or Rio Grande, 
NM (SWA) 32-18 
Sogn, MN (NCS) 24-16, 24-23 
Soldier River, Near Ute, IA (MRO) 26-27 
Soleduck River Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-29 
Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA (NPS) 
38-29 
Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Luzerne County, PA 
(NAB) 4-38 
Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD (NAB) 4-38 
Somerville Lake, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-17, 30-20 
Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demonstration Project 
(SPN) 34-3, 34-9, 34-12 
Sonomo Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 
Sope Creek, Marietta, GA (SAM) 10-50 
Souris River Basin, ND (NCS) 24-17, 24-23 
Souris River, Velva, ND (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
South Agat (Route 2) Shoreline, Guam (POD) 36-11 
South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, NY (NAN) 2-30 
South Bank, Arkansas River (Head Fourche Island to 
Pennington Bayou), AR (SWL) 28-23 
South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, 
AR Tucker Lakes (SWL) 28-23 
South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee 
District, IL, (NCR) 23-13 
South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL 
(NCR) 23-13, 23-15 
South Beloit, IL (NCR) 23-14 
South Bristol Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 
South Central PA Environmental Restoration (ORP) 
18-5, 18-13 
South Central Pennsylvania Environmental Restoration 
(NAB) 4-16, 4-29, 4-38 
South Channel, Government Island, OR (NPP) 37-38 
South Coventry Lake, CT (NED) 1-59 
South Creek, Martinburg, NE (MRO) 26-27 
South Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 
South Deer Creek, OK (SWT) 29-28 
South Ellenville, NY (NAN) 2-30 
South Fork, Boise River, ID (NPW) 39-16 
South Fork, Clearwater River, ID (NPW) 39-17 
South Fork, Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, ID 
(NPW) 39-16 
South Fork, Elkhorn River, Ewing, NE (MRO) 26-25 
South Fork of Cumberland River, KY (ORN) 15-13 
South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita 
Valley, CA (SPL) 33-38 
South Fork of Wildcat Creek, County Road 7 East, 
Tippecanoe County, IN (ORL) 16-34, 16-39 
South Haven Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-38, 21-70, 21-88 
South Holston River, Kingsport, TN (ORN) 15-18 
I-63

South Llano River, Junction, TX (SWF) 30-23 
South Main Channel, TX (SWG) 31-14 
South Milwaukee Harbor, WI (1836 Flood Control 
Act) (NCE) 21-98 
South Orange, NJ (NAN) 2-30 
South Platte River, Adams County, No. Washington 
Street, Water and Sanitary District, CO (MRO) 
26-26 
South Platte River Basin, CO (MRO) 26-8, 26-24 
South Platte River, Fort Lupton Hwy 85 (MRO) 26-26 
South Platte River, Iliff, CO (MRO) 26-26 
South Platte River, Kersey, CO (MRO) 26-26 
South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, 
Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, CO (MRO) 26-17 
South Platte River, Logan County Bridges 175A and 
173, NE (MRO) 26-26, 26-31 
South Platte River, Merino, CO (MRO) 26-26 
South Platte River, Platteville, CO (MRO) 26-26 
South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 61, CO 
(MRO) 26-31 
South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 28, CO 
(MRO) 26-31 
South Plymouth Lake, NY (NAB) 4-40 
South Point, OH (ORH) 17-22 
South Pole Cat Creeks, Lacoste, TX (SWF) 30-23 
South Portsmouth, KY (ORH) 17-22 
South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 
23-13, 23-15 
South Raccoon River, Dexter, IA (NCR) 23-16 
South River, Conway, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 
South River Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-13, 
23-15 
South River, NC (SAW) 6-28 
South Slough (Charleston), OR (NPP) 37-38 
South Turnbridge Lake, VT (NED) 1-59 
South Two River, MN (NCS) 24-33 
South Williamson, KY (ORH) 17-24 
Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI (NED) 1-15, 
1-37, 1-49 
Southeast Missouri Port, MO (LSM) 14-10, 14-14 
Southern New York Flood Control Projects (NAB) 
4-17, 4-38 
Southport Beach, CT (NED) 1-54 
Southport Harbor, CT (NED) 1-52 
Southwest Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 
Southwest Ohio Urban Waterfront Development (ORL) 
16-24 
Southwestern Jefferson County, KY (ORL) 16-4, 
16-14, 16-33 
Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS (SAM) 10-21, 10-34, 
10-45, 10-49 
Spanish Fork River, UT (SPK) 35-41 
Spokane River, Spokane, WA (NPS) 38-29, 38-30 
Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA (NAB) 
4-38 
Spring City, KY (ORN) 15-18 
Spring Creek, Rockaway, OR (NPP) 37-43 
Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 
23-13, 23-15 
Spring Street, Tupelo, MS (SAM) 10-52 
Springdale, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 
Springers Branch, MS (SAM) 10-57 
Springfield, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 
Springfield, SD Water Intake (MRO) 26-22 
Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Bellingham, WA (NPS) 
38-26 
Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-64 
Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL (NCR) 23-11 
St Catherines Sound, MD (NAB) 4-36 
St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, NY (NAN) 2-28 
St. Anthony Falls Lower Lock and Dam 25-9 
St. Anthony Falls Upper Lock 25-5 
St. Augustine Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-32, 9-44 
St. Clair County, AL (SAM) 10-57 
St. Clair, MN (NCS) 24-32 
St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI (1930 R&H 
Act) (NCE) 21-98 
St. Clair River, MI (NCE) 21-32, 21-69, 21-86 
St. Croix River, ME (NED) 1-52 
St. Croix River, MN and WI (NCS) 24-25 
St. Croix River, Stillwater, MN (NCS) 24-4, 24-21 
St. Francis River Highway No. 90, AR (LMM) 13-5 
St. George, AK (NPA) 40-6, 40-12, 40-16 
St. Georges Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36, 4-40 
St. Hilaire, MN (NCS) 24-18, 24-24 
St. James, Beaver Island, MI (NCE) 21-95 
St. Jeromes Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 
St. John River Basin, ME (NED) 1-27, 1-41, 1-51 
St. Johns County, FL (SAJ) 9-21, 9-34, 9-50 
St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, FL (SAJ) 
9-13, 9-32, 9-44 
St. Jones River, DE, Delaware Bay to Lebanon Jetties 
and new entrance at mouth (NAP) 3-27, 3-28 
St. Joseph Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-33, 21-69, 21-86 
I-64

St. Joseph River, MI (NCE) 21-95 
St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, 
MO (LSM) 14-17 
St. Louis Harbor, MO and IL (LSM) 14-2, 14-11 
St. Lucie Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-32, 9-45 
St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID (NPS) 38-28 
St. Marks River, FL (SAM) 10-49 
St. Mary's, AK (NPA) 40-17 
St. Mary's, WV (ORH) 17-22 
St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 18-24 
St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates), MI 
(1942 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 
St. Marys River, MI (NCE) 21-34, 21-69, 21-86 
St. Michaels Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-36 
St. Patricks Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 
St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 
St. Paul Harbor, MN 25-7 
St. Paul Island Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-6, 40-13, 40-16 
St. Paul, MN (NCS) 24-19, 24-24 
St. Peters Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 
St. Petersburg Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 
St. Regis River at St. Regis, MT (NPS) 38-28 
St. Regis River, MT (NPS) 38-28, 38-30 
St. Thomas Harbor, VI (SAJ) 9-51 
Stamford, CT (NED) 1-27, 1-42, 1-51 
Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) 
(NED) 1-59 
Stamford Harbor, CT (inactive portion) (NED) 1-59 
Stamford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-52 
Star Valley, AZ (SPL) 33-32 
Starlings Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA (NPS) 
38-29 
State Highway 111 Bridge, Lake Texana, TX (SWG) 
31-15, 31-21 
State Highway 156, Kay County, OK (SWT) 29-28 
State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA (NPP) 
37-39 
State Road & Ebner Coulees, WI (NCS) 24-18, 24-23, 
24-29 
Staten Island, NY (NAN) 2-30 
Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Bridge, Arthur 
Kill, NY (NAN) 2-28 
Ste. Genevieve Drainage and Levee District No. 1, 
MO (LSM) 14-17 
Ste. Genevieve, MO (LSM) 14-12 
Steinhatchee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 
Sterling Center, MN (NCS) 24-18, 24-23 
Sterling, KS (SWT) 29-30 
Stevens Creek, Village of Forsyth, IL (NCR) 23-16 
Stewart Canyon Debris Basin and Channel (SPL) 33-38 
Stikine River, AK (NPA) 40-15 
Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop 
Highway, near Robe, WA (NPS) 38-29 
Stillaguamish River, WA (NPS) 38-11, 38-18, 38-24, 
38-29, 38-30 
Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-17, 
30-21 
Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT (NPS) 38-29 
Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA (NAB) 4-20, 
4-30, 4-38 
Stillwater River, MT (NPS) 38-29 
Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR (NPP) 
37-40 
Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA (SPK) 35-38 
Stockton Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 
Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO (MRK) 27-8, 27-13, 
27-17, 27-22 
Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson County, KS (MRK) 27-17 
Stoner Creek, North Middleton, KY (ORL) 16-34 
Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORP) 
18-10, 18-14, 18-21, 18-28 
Stoney Branch, Rock Hill, SC (SAN) 7-24 
Stoney Creek, Branford, CT (NED) 1-10, 1-34, 1-45 
Stoney Creek, Goldsboro, NC (SAW) 6-34 
Stonington Harbor, CT (NED) 1-52 
Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 
1-59 
Stonington Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52, 1-59 
Stony Brook, Wilton, NH (NED) 1-56 
Stony Creek, Branford, CT (NED) 1-12, 1-36, 1-49 
Stonycreek River, Johnstown, PA (reconnaisance) 
(ORP) 18-30 
Stratford, CT (NED) 1-59 
Stream SB13, Dallas, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization 
(SAN) 7-10, 7-22 
Strington, Ft. Chartres, and Ivy Landing, IL (LSM) 
14-16 
Strong Creek, Hope, ID (NPS) 38-29 
Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID (NPW) 39-17 
Stuart, VA (SAW) 6-30 
Stumpy Point Bay, NC (SAW) 6-28 
I-65

Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI 
(NCE) 21-38, 21-71, 21-88 
Sturgeon Point, Evans, NY (NCB) 20-14, 20-45 
Sturgis, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 
Styrons Creek, Carteret County, NC (SAW) 6-32 
Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay 
Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL 
(NCR) 23-13, 23-15 
Sucker Brook Dam, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-56 
Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH (ORL) 16-35 
Sugar Creek Levee, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Sugar Creek, Watermelon Hollow Road, Montgomery 
County, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH (NED) 1-59 
Suisun Bay Channel, CA (SPK) 35-38 
Suisun Bay Channel, CA (SPN) 34-9 
Suisun Channel, CA (SPK) 35-38 
Suisun Channel, CA (SPN) 34-9 
Suisun Point Channel, CA (SPK) 35-38 
Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 
Sulphur Branch, Euless, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Sulphur River, AR and TX (LMN) 11-14 
Sulphur RW Red River, Franklin City, TX (SWF) 
30-23 
Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 
17-9, 17-15, 17-19 
Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-28 
Sun Creek, Okibbeha County, MS (SAM) 10-50 
Sun River, Great Falls, MT (MRO) 26-25 
Sunbright, TN (Whiteoak Creek) (ORN) 15-18 
Sunbury, PA (NAB) 4-38, 4-45 
Sunset Harbor (Bolsa Chica Bay), CA SPL) 33-35 
Supervisor of New York Harbor (NAN) 2-9, 2-17 
Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads 
(Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious 
Deposits) (NAO) 5-7, 5-14 
Support for Other Agencies 48-1 
Surfside, Sunset and Newport Beach, CA (SPL) 33-5, 
33-16, 33-28 
Surry Mountain Lake, NH (NED) 1-21, 1-39 
Surveillance of Northern Waters and International 
Water Studies (NCE) 21-45 
Surveys 
Alaska District (NPA) 40-9 
Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-10 
Baltimore District (NAB) 4-24 
Buffalo District (NCB) 20-18 
Chicago District (NCC) 22-13 
Detroit District (NCE) 21-49 
Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-13 
Galveston District (SWG) 31-18 
Huntington District (ORH) 17-11 
Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-26 
Little Rock District (SWL) 28-12 
Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-12 
Louisville District (ORL) 16-13 
Mobile District (SAM) 10-28 
Nashville District (ORN) 15-8 
New England Division (NED) 1-31 
New York District (NAN) 2-15 
Norfolk District (NAO) 5-11 
Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-3 
Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 
Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 
Portland District (NPP) 37-24 
Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 
Sacramento District (SPK) 35-25 
San Francisco District (SPN) 34-7 
Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 
Seattle District (NPS) 38-13 
St. Paul District (NCS) 24-20 
Tulsa District (SWT) 29-13 
Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-4 
Wilmington District (SAW) 6-18 
Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, 
MD (NAB) 4-36 
Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA (NAB) 4-36 
Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA 
(NAB) 4-21, 4-38 
Susquehanna River, Sunbury Closure Structure, PA 
(NAB) 4-40 
Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-10, 
17-15, 17-19 
Suwannee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 
Swan Creek Bank Stabilization, Taney County, AR 
(SWL) 28-23 
Swan Creek, OH (NCB) 20-45 
Swanton Harbor, VT (NAN) 2-32 
Sweetwater Creek, Austell, GA (SAM) 10-52 
Sweetwater Creek, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Sweetwater River, CA (SPL) 33-11, 33-20, 33-34 
Swift Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-34 
Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, NC (SAW) 
6-30 
I-66

Swinomish Channel, WA (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-23 
Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA (NAB) 4-38 
Sykesville, PA (ORP) 18-22 
Syracuse, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, NY (NCB) 20-44 
T 
Table Rock Lake, MO (SWL) 28-12, 28-17, 28-31 
Tacoma Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA (NPS) 38-11, 38-18, 
38-24 
Tacoma, WA (NPS) 38-31 
Tahchevah Creek Detention Basin and Channel 
Improvements (SPL) 33-39 
Tahola, WA (NPS) 38-29 
Tahquitz Creek (SPL) 33-39 
Talkeetna River, AK (NPA) 40-16 
Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw County, MS (SAM) 
10-50 
Tallahalla Creek, Laurel, MS (SAM) 10-21, 10-34, 
10-45 
Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS (LMK) 12-16 
Tallapoosa River, AL (SAM) 10-49 
Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam (POD) 36-10 
Tama, IA (NCR) 23-16 
Tamaqua, PA (NAP) 3-29 
Tampa and Hillsborough Bays, FL (SAJ) 9-44 
Tampa Harbor (Port Sutton), FL (SAJ) 9-32 
Tampa Harbor Branch Channels, FL (SAJ) 9-46 
Tampa Harbor East Bay Channel, FL (SAJ) 9-31, 9-46 
Tampa Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-14, 9-32, 9-46 
Tangier Channels, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Tangier Island Shore Protection, VA (NAO) 5-17 
Tangipahoa River, LA (LMN) 11-14 
Tar River and Tributaries, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Tar River, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Tar River, Princeville, NC (SAW) 6-30 
Tarentum, PA (ORP) 18-22 
Tarrytown Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-10, 2-17, 2-23 
Taskinas Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Tatitlek, AK (NPA) 40-17 
Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-7 
Taunton River, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 1-59 
Taunton River, MA (NED) 1-52 
Tawas Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-40, 21-75, 21-93 
Taylors Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-16, 31-23, 31-39 
Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 
16-33 
Taylorsville Lake, KY (ORL) 16-11, 16-17 
Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA (SPL) 
33-38 
Tell City, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-25, 16-28, 16-33 
Ten Mile Creek, De Soto, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Ten Mile River, Chesire, CT (NED) 1-61 
Tenants Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 
Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 
Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 
Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK (SWT) 29-12, 29-21, 29-25, 
29-27 
Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA (ORP) 18-22 
Tennessee River, Chattanooga, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Tennessee River, Clinton, TN (ORN) 15-18 
Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY (ORN) 15-3, 15-9, 
15-11, 15-16, 15-17 
Tennessee River UT Experiment Station (ORN) 15-18 
Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS (SAM) 
10-15, 10-33, 10-44, (ORN) 15-3, 15-9, 15-12 
Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation, AL and MS 
(SAM) 10-16, 10-33, 10-45 
Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA (LMK) 12-16 
Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River) 
(ORL) 16-23, 16-33 
Terre Haute, IN (ORL) 16-26 
Teton River, Hwy Bridge 223, Chateau, MT (MRO) 
26-31 
Teton River, Hwy Bridge 89, Chateau, MT (MRO) 
26-31 
Teton River, ID (NPW) 39-17 
Teton River, Near Choteau (Hwy 89) M25 (MRO) 
26-24 
Teton RV/Chateau/Teton County, MT (MRO) 26-25 
Texas City and Vicinity (Hurricane Flood Protection), 
TX (SWG) 31-27 
Texas City Channel, TX (SWG) 31-8, 31-21, 31-36, 
31-42 
Thames River Basin, CT, RI and MA (NED) 1-27 
Thames River, CT (NED) 1-52 
Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 
The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, OR (NPP) 37-38 
The Dalles-Celilo Canal, OR and WA (NPP) 37-38 
The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lacke Celilo, WA and OR 
(NPP) 37-23, 37-30, 37-37, 37-45 
The Inland Route, MI (NCE) 21-16, 21-59, 21-80 
I-67

The Island Lake, VT (NED) 1-59 
Thimble Shoals Channel, VA (NAO) 5-8, 5-14, 5-19, 
5-22, 5-25 
Thomas Creek, CA (SPK) 35-44 
Thomaston Dam, CT (NED) 1-23, 1-40 
Thomasville (Walnut Street), NC (SAW) 6-14 
Thoroughfare Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Three Forks, Lower Madison River (MRO) 26-25 
Three Islands Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN (ORN) 
15-14 
Three Rivers, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 
Three Rivers, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Threemile Creek, Mobile, LA (SAM) 10-21, 10-34, 
10-46 
Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA (NED) 1-59 
Thurman to Hamburg, IA (MRO) 26-8, 26-17, 26-24 
Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, 
LA (LMN) 11-14 
Ticonderoga River, NY (NAN) 2-32 
Tijuana River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-38 
Tilghman Island Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-10, 4-27, 4-36 
Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR (NPP) 37-9, 37-27, 37-34 
Tillamook, OR (NPP) 37-42 
Tillamook River, OR (NPP) 37-43 
Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA (NAB) 4-21, 4-31 
Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-10, 
18-15, 18-21, 18-28 
Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), AR (SWL) 
28-4, 28-26 
Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 only), PA 
(NAP) 3-31 
Todd Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-21 
Toledo Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-12, 20-25, 20-44 
Tolovana River (Snagging), AK (NPA) 40-16 
Tolu, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 
17-10, 17-15, 17-19 
Tomahawk Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-19 
Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID (NPW) 39-16 
Tombigbee River (East Fork), MS & AL (SAM) 10-22, 
10-34, 10-46 
Tombigbee River & Tributaries, MS & AL (SAM) 
10-22, 10-34, 10-46 
Tombigbee River at Columbus Port, MS (SAM) 10-49 
Tombigbee River Bridge #6, Monroe County, MS 
(SAM) 10-21, 10-34, 10-46 
Tombigbee River, Demopolis. AL (SAM) 10-51 
Toms River, NJ (NAP) 3-10, 3-19, 3-26, 3-30 
Tonawanda Creek, Block Church Road, Niagara 
County, NY (NCB) 20-46 
Tonawanda Creek Road, Erie County, NY (NCB) 
20-46 
Tonawanda Creek Road, Minnick, NY (NCB) 20-46 
Tongue Point, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Tongue River Lake, ND (NCS) 24-28 
Tongue River, WY (MRO) 26-31 
Topeka, Kansas River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 
Topsail Bay and Surf City, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Toronto Lake, KS (SWL) 28-28 
Toronto Lake, KS (SWT) 29-10, 29-19, 29-24, 29-27 
Torrington, East Branch, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-64 
Torrington, West Branch, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-64 
Totuskey Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA (NPW) 39-16, 39-17 
Towanda Lake, KS (SWT) 29-27 
Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 
1-58 
Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (NED) 1-54 
Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX (SWF) 
30-13, 30-18, 30-21 
Town Branch Creek, Lockhart, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA (NED) 1-29, 
1-42, 1-52 
Town Creek, Americus, GA (SAM) 10-50 
Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY (ORL) 16-23 
Town Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Town Creek, SC (SAN) 7-7, 7-13, 7-18 
Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA (NED) 1-59 
Town of North Beach, MD (NAB) 4-12, 4-27, 4-37 
Townsends Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ (NAP) 
3-29 
Townshend Lake, VT (NED) 1-21, 1-39 
Trabuco Dam (SPL) 33-40 
Tradewater River, KY (ORL) 16-22 
Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Tranters Creek, NC (SAW) 6-31 
Trask River, Tillamook County, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Treasure Island, MO (LMM) 13-5 
Tred Avon River, MD (NAB) 4-9, 4-25, 4-32 
Tremplealeau River, Arcadia, WI (NCS) 24-29 
Trent River, Basins and Access Channels at New Bern, 
NC (SAW) 6-31 
Trent River, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-30, 6-34 
Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO (MRK) 27-17 
I-68

Trexler Lake, PA (NAP) 3-31 
Tri Pond Levee, IL (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Tributary to Dudley Branch (SWF) 30-23 
Trim Cane Creek, Okitbbeha County, MS (SAM) 
10-50 
Trimble Wildlife Area, Smithville Lake, MO (MRK) 
27-17 
Trinidad Lake, CO (SWA) 32-8, 32-13 
Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (SWG) 31-9, 31-21, 
31-37, 31-42, 31-49 
Trinity River Project, TX (SWF) 30-2, 30-15, 30-21 
Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River) (ORL) 
16-23, 16-33 
Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV (SPL) 33-11, 
33-20 
Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY (ORL) 16-33 
Troy, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Truckee Meadows, NV (SPK) 35-35 
Truckee River and Tributaries, CA and NV (SPK) 
35-39 
Trumbull Lake, CT (NED) 1-56 
Trussville, AL (SAM) 10-50 
Truth or Consequences Unit, NM (SWA) 32-8, 32-15, 
32-17 
Tualatin, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Tucannon River, Wooten, WA (NPW) 39-16 
Tuckahoe River, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Tuckerton Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 
Tuckerton River, NJ (NAP) 3-10, 3-19, 3-26 
Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and 
Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY (ORN) 
15-5, 15-9 
Tully Lake, MA (NED) 1-21, 1-39 
Tulsa and West Tulsa, OK (SWT) 29-10, 29-20, 29-24, 
29-26 
Tulsa/West Tulsa Levees, OK (SWT) 29-20 
Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock, PA (NAB) 4-38 
Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-21, 7-24 
Turkey River, Elgin Sewage Treatment, IA (NCC) 
23-16 
Turkey River, Fayette County Road B64, IA (NCC) 
23-16 
Turner Creek, Corinth, MS (LMM) 13-5 
Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-50 
Turtle Creek LPP, Yukon, OK (SWT) 29-26 
Turtle Creek, PA (ORP) 18-6, 18-13, 18-22 
Tuscon Diversion Channel (Recreation Development) 
(SPL) 33-11, 33-20, 33-34 
Tuskahoma Lake, OK (SWT) 29-26 
Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-7, 
27-13, 27-17, 27-22 
Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (Road Improvement - 1974 
Mod.) (MRK) 27-19, 27-20 
Tuttle Creek Lake, KS Road and Bridge (1976 Act) 
(MRK) 27-19, 27-20 
Twelvemile Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-22 
Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, 
MS (SAM) 10-50 
Twin Valley Lake, MN (NCS) 24-26 
Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Two Harbors, MN (NCE) 21-39, 21-71, 21-88 
Two Rivers Dam, NM (SWA) 32-8, 32-13 
Two Rivers Harbor, WI (1935 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 
Two Rivers Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-39, 21-72, 21-88 
Tyaskin Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Tybee Island, GA (SAS) 8-7, 8-13, 8-20 
Tygart Lake, WV (ORP) 18-3, 18-13, 18-18 
Tylers Beach Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-16 
Tyrone, PA (NAB) 4-38, 4-45 
U 
U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, TX (SWG) 
31-37 
Umatac Shoreline, Guam (POD) 36-11 
Umatilla Harbor, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Umatilla River (Echo), OR (NPP) 37-41 
Umatilla River, OR (NPW) 39-16 
Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Umatilla River Water District, OR (NPP) 37-43 
Umpqua River, OR (NPP) 37-9, 37-27, 37-35 
Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Umpqua River-Winchester Bay, OR (NPP) 37-10, 
37-27, 37-35 
Unadilla, NY (NAB) 4-38 
Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-11, 
18-15, 18-21, 18-28 
Union Creek/Stanton Bridge, NE (MRO) 26-25 
Union Lake, MO (LSM) 14-17 
Union River, ME (NED) 1-52 
Union Township Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-13 
Union Village Dam, VT (NED) 1-22, 1-40 
I-69

Uniontown, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 
Uniontown, PA (ORP) 18-24 
University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, CA 
(SPL) 33-40 
Unnamed Creek, Tioga, ND (MRO) 26-24 
Upper Cedar River, WA (NPS) 38-31 
Upper Chipola River, FL from Marianna to its Mouth 
(SAM) 10-49 
Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM) 10-22, 
10-35, 10-46 
Upper Grand River, MO (MRK) 27-17 
Upper Grays River Area, WA (NPP) 37-39 
Upper Iowa River, IA (NCS) 24-26 
Upper Jordan River, CA (SPK) 35-35 
Upper Machodoc Creek, VA (NAB) 4-36 
Upper Marlboro, MD (NAB) 4-38, 4-44 
Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management 
Program (LSM) 14-7 
Upper Mississippi River - Illinois Navigation Study 
(NCR) 23-3, 23-7 
Upper Mississippi River System Environmental 
Management Program (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, 
MN, MO, WI (NCR) 23-3 
Upper Mississippi River System Environmental 
Management Program (UMRS-EMP)(NCS) 24-3 
Upper Missouri River, SD Streambank Erosion Control 
Project (MRO) 26-23 
Upper Puyallup River, WA (NPS) 38-29 
Upper Thorofare, MD (NAB) 4-36 
Upper White Oak Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Upper White River, AR (SWL) 28-21 
Upper Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Urban Areas of Alton, IL (LSM) 14-16 
Urbanna Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 
US Highway 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN (LMM) 13-5 
Utica, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Utica, OH (ORH) 17-23, 17-24 
Uvas Creek (SPN) 34-14 
V 
Valdez Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 
Valley, AL (SAM) 10-52 
Valley City Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 
14-16 
Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 
Valley View Branch, Hurst, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Van Bibber Creek, Arvada, CO (MRO) 26-30 
Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-23 
Van Meter, IA (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 
Vanceburg, KY (ORH) 17-21 
Vancouver Lake Area, WA (NPP) 37-40 
Vatia Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 
Vaughn, MT, Sun River, Great Falls (MRO) 26-22, 
26-25 
Velva (Bonnes Coulee), ND (NCS) 24-29 
Velva, ND (NCS) 24-27, 24-31 
Ventura Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-16, 33-28, 33-39 
Ventura-Pierpoint Area, CA (SPL) 33-36 
Ventura River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-38 
Ventura River Levee (SPL) 33-38 
Verdigris River City Basin, KS (SWT) 29-28 
Vermilion Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-13, 20-25 
Vermillion River and Tributaries, SD (MRO) 26-23 
Vermillion River Basin, SD (MRO) 26-28 
Vermillion River, Hastings, MN (NCS) 24-27, 24-31 
Vermillion River, Vermillion, SD (MRO) 26-25 
Vernon Branch, Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-49 
Verona (Mouth of Feather River), CA (SPK) 35-41 
Verona Lake, VA (NAB) 4-38 
Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, 
Hastings, MN (NCS) 24-27, 24-31 
Vevay, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Victoria Beach, East Haven, CT (NED) 1-60 
Victory Lake, VT (NED) 1-59 
Villa Park Dam (SPL) 33-40 
Village Creek, Birmingham, AL (SAM) 10-23, 10-35, 
10-46 
Village Creek, Jackson and Lawerence Counties, AR 
(SWL) 28-23 
Village Creek, SC (SAN) 7-20 
Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee 
Districts, AR (SWL) 28-23 
Village of New Athens, IL (LSM) 14-16 
Village of Saxtons, VT (NED) 1-56 
Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX (SWG) 31-37 
Vincennes, IN (Partial) (ORL) 16-26 
Vincennes, IN (Uncompleted Portion) (ORL) 16-30 
Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 
16-33 
Vineyard Haven Harbor, MA (NED) 1-60 
Vineyard Haven, MA (NED) 1-52 
Virginia Beach Canal No. 2, VA (NAO) 5-17 
I-70

Virginia Beach, VA (Hurricane Protection) (NAO) 5-9, 
5-15, 5-19 
Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement) (NAO) 5-7, 5-9, 
5-15, 5-19 
Volga, IA (NCR) 23-15 
W 
W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY (LMM) 13-5 
W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, NC (SAW) 6-15, 
6-22 
W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14) (SWL) 28-26 
W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK (SWT) 29-27 
Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, 
and Valley City, IL (LSM) 14-14 
Wabash River, Adams County, IN (ORL) 16-31, 16-33 
Wabash River Basin (ORL) 16-12, 16-20 
Wabash River, near Merom, IN (ORL) 16-34 
Wabash River, New Harmony, IN (ORL) 16-34, 16-35 
Wabash River, Terre Haute, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Wabash River, Vigo County, County Road 83 West 
(ORL) 16-34 
Wabash River, Vigo County, Little Road (ORL) 16-34, 
16-35 
Wabash River, York Township, Clark County, IL 
(ORL) 16-24 
Wabasha County, County Hwy 11, MN (NCS) 24-19, 
24-24, 24-32 
Wabasha Harbor, MN 25-7 
Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN (NCS) 24-27 
Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, NC & SC (SAW) 
6-30 
Waccamaw River, NC & SC (SAN) 7-20 
Waco Creek, Waco, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Waco Lake, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-18, 30-21 
Waco Lake, TX (Dam Safety) (SWF) 30-11, 30-18, 30- 
21 
Wagoner County, CO (SWT) 29-30 
Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, WA (NPP) 
37-40 
Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 
Waikiki Beach, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 
Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-9 
Waimea Beach, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-10 
Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island (POD) 36-10 
Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Wallabout Channel, NY (NAN) 2-28 
Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Wallace Lake, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-22 
Wallace, WV (ORP) 18-23 
Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH (NED) 1-54 
Wallisville Lake, TX (SWG) 31-9 
Wallowa River, Weaver Bridge, OR (NPW) 39-16 
Walluski River Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 
Walnut Bottom Run, Beaver Falls, PA (detalied project 
report) (ORP) 18-30 
Walnut Creek, CA (SPK) 35-22, 35-31 
Walnut Creek, Mansfield, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Walnut Creek, Seguin, TX (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 
Walnut Creek, Springtown, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Walnut River, Cowley County, KS (SWT) 29-29 
Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL & GA (SAM) 
10-27, 10-36, 10-47 
Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, NY (NAN) 2-30 
Wappinger Creek, NY (NAN) 2-28 
Ware, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 
Wareham Harbor, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 1-59 
Wareham Harbor, MA (NED) 1-52 
Wareham-Marion, MA (NED) 1-59 
Warner Road at Sibley Street, Mississippi River, St. 
Paul, MN (NCS), 24-27, 24-31 
Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (NCS) 
24-27, 24-31 
Warren River, RI (NED) 1-52 
Warrenton Diking District 1, Clatsop County, OR 
(NPP) 37-39 
Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR 
(NPP) 37-39 
Warroad Harbor and River, MN (NCS) 24-3, 24-21, 
24-25, 24-29 
Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, MN (NCS) 24-28 
Warsaw Harbor, IL 25-8 
Warsaw, NY, Oatka Creek (NCB) 20-44 
Warwick Cove, RI (NED) 1-52 
Warwick River (NAB) 4-36 
Warwood, WV (ORP) 18-24 
Washington Aqueduct (NAB) 4-24 
Washington Canal and South River, NJ (NAN) 2-28 
Washington DC and Vicinity (NAB) 4-38 
Washington Harbor, DC (NAB) 4-10, 4-27, 4-36 
Washington Island, WI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 
Washington on Brazos State Park, TX (SWF) 30-23 
Washington, PA (ORP) 18-22 
Washington Street Bridge, Laredo, TX (SWF) 30-23 
1-71

Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR (NPP) 
37-40 
Water Resources Support Center 46-1 
Water Valley, Eleven Point River, AR & MO (SWL) 
28-23 
Water Works, Park and Pool, Wellsburg, WV 
(completed) (ORP) 18-30 
Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, VT 
(NAN) 2-30 
Waterbury, VT (NAN) 2-32 
Waterbury-Watertown, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-64 
Wateree River, SC (SAN) 7-20 
Waterford, NY (NAN) 2-32 
Waterloo, IA (Bridges) (NCR) 23-13 
Waterloo, IA (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 
Waterloo, NE (MRO) 26-22, 26-26 
Waterman Creek, Near Sutherland, IA (MRO) 26-27 
Watertown and Vicinity, SD (MRO) 26-28 
Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort 
Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-7, 6-20, 6-25 
Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, 
WA (NPS) 38-26 
Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep 
Bay, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Waterway from Empire, LA to Gulf of Mexico (LMN) 
11-14 
Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, 
DE (NAP) 3-27 
Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, 
LA (LMN) 11-11, 11-14 
Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank 
River, MD (NAB) 4-40 
Waterway - Norfolk, VA to Sounds of NC (SAW) 6-28 
Waterway on the Coast of VA (NAO) 5-8, 5-14, 5-19, 
5-25 
Waterways Experiment Station 44-1 
Watkins Glen, NY 1941 FC Act (NCB) 20-47 
Waukegan Harbor, IL (NCC) 22-6, 22-15, 22-20, 
22-22 
Waurika Lake, OK (SWT) 29-10, 29-20, 29-24 
Waveland, MS (SAM) 10-52 
Waveland Seawall, Waveland, MS (SAM) 10-23, 10- 
35, 10-46 
Waverley, WV (ORH) 17-22 
Waycake Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-32 
Webb District Improvement Co, Columbia County, OR 
(NPP) 37-39 
Webber Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK (SWT) 29-28 
Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (No. 16) (SWL) 28-26 
Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK (SWT) 29-12, 
29-22, 29-25 
Weber River and Tributaries, UT (SPK) 35-41 
Weeks Bay, AL (SAM) 10-48 
Weiser River, Cambridge-Midvale (NPW) 39-17 
Weiser River, ID (NPW) 39-16, 39-17 
Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID (NPW) 39-17 
Welles Harbor, Midway Island (POD) 36-7 
Wellfleet Harbor, MA (NED) 1-13, 1-36, 1-49 
Wells and Drake Island, Wells, ME (NED) 1-60 
Wells Harbor, ME (NED) 1-61 
Wellsburg, WV (ORP) 18-24 
Wellsville, NY Genesee River (NCB) 20-44 
Wellsville, OH, Section I (ORP) 18-22 
Wellsville, OH, Section II (ORP) 18-22 
Wenatchie River, WA (NPS) 38-30 
Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA (NED) 1-54 
West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson 
Parish, LA (LMN) 11-12 
West Branch Chisholm Creek LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 
29-28 
West Branch Limestone Creek, Manlius, NY (NCB) 
20-45 
West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA (NAB) 4-22, 
4-38 
West Branch, Papillion Creek, Omaha, NE (MRO) 
26-27 
West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA (NED) 
1-56 
West Bridgewater, PA (ORP) 18-24 
West Brookfield Reservoir, MA (NED) 1-59 
West Canaan Lake, NH (NED) 1-59 
West Columbus, OH (ORH) 17-10, 17-15, 17-19 
West Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-5, 23-8, 23-10 
West Fork, Blue River, Salem, IN (ORL) 16-39 
West Fork, Des Moines River, MN (NCR) 23-16 
West Fork, Drakes Creek, TN & KY (ORL) 16-24 
West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH (ORL) 16-11, 
16-17, 16-31 
West Fork, WV (ORH) 17-23 
West Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-9, 20-19, 20-39 
West Hill Dam, MA (NED) 1-16, 1-37, 1-50 
West Hill, Worcester, MA (NED) 1-61 
West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA (ORP) 18-22 
West Makinster Road, Wilson River, OR (NPP) 37-40 
I-72

West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 
23-15 
West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR (NPP) 
37-41 
West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near 
Malvern, IA (MRO) 26-27 
West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near 
Hastings, IA (MRO) 26-27 
West Nishnabotna River, Near Hancock, IA (MRO) 
26-27 
West Nishnabotna River, Near Oakland, IA (MRO) 
26-27, 26-31 
West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-23 
West Oneonta Lake, NY (NAB) 4-40 
West Point, Chattahoochee River, GA (SAM) 10-50 
West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA & 
FL (SAS) 8-11 
West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & 
GA (SAM) 10-27, 10-36, 10-47 
West Point, NE (MRO) 26-22, 26-26 
West River, New Haven, CT (NED) 1-29, 1-42, 1-52, 
1-70 
West River Road Near Wabun, Roanoke County, VA 
(SAW) 6-34 
West Roanoke County, VA (SAW) 6-34 
West Sacramento, CA (SPK) 35-35 
West Springfield, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 
West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 
16-28, 16-33 
West Thompson Lake, CT (NED) 1-28, 1-42, 1-70 
West Union, Middle Island, WV (ORH) 17-24 
West Warren, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 
Westchester Creek, NY (NAN) 2-28, 2-32 
Westcott Cove, CT (NED) 1-52 
Westerly Creek, CO (MRO) 26-8, 26-17, 26-24 
Westerly, RI (NED) 1-59 
Westfield, MA (NED) 1-59 
Westfork, MS (SAM) 10-51 
Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA (NPS) 38-26 
Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, 
OR (NPP) 37-39 
Weston Mills, Olean, NY (ORP) 18-23 
Weston Mills, Portville, NY (ORP) 18-23 
Weston, VT (NED) 1-50, 1-63 
Westpoint, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-30 
Westport, CT (NED) 1-59 
Westport District Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR 
(NPP) 37-39 
Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (NED) 1-52 
Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT 
(uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 
Westport, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 
Westport, OR - Puget Island, WA (NPP) 37-10, 37-27, 
37-35 
Westport River, MA (NED) 1-59 
Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot 
channel) (NPP) 37-40 
Westport Slough, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Westville Lake, MA (NED) 1-29, 1-42, 1-70 
Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA (Hurricane protection) 
(LMN) 11-6, 11-10 
Weymouth Back River, CT (NED) 1-52 
Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivers, MA (NED) 1-52, 
1-61 
Whalehead Club, Corolla, NC (SAW) 6-32, 6-34 
Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge (NAP) 3-27, 
3-30 
Wheeler Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling) (ORP) 18-24 
Wheeling, WV (ORP) 18-24 
Wheeling, WV (Wheeling Island) (ORP) 18-24 
Whelton Ditch, OR (NPP) 37-40 
White City Park, OH 1954 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 
White Lake Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-40, 21-72, 21-89 
White Oak Creek, OH (ORH) 17-23 
White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, NC 
(SAW) 6-30 
White River, AR (above Peach Orchard Bluff) (SWL) 
28-21 
White River, AR (below Newport) (LMM) 13-4 
White River, at Hwy. 14, 1/4 mile east of Oil Trough, 
AR (SWL) 28-23 
White River Bank Stabilization, Batesville, AR (SWL) 
28-23 
White River Basin (Little Rock District, AR & MO) 
(SWL) 28-8, 28-16, 28-20 
White River, Batesville, AR (SWL) 28-9, 28-16 
White River, Blue Bluff Road, Morgan, IN (ORL) 
16-35 
White River, Brookville, IN (ORL) 16-35 
White River, Franklin County, IN (ORL) 16-35 
White River, IN (ORL) 16-22 
White River, Jacksonport, AR (SWL) 28-21, 28-23 
I-73

White River, Newport, AR (SWL) 28-23 
White River, Petersburg (Pike County), IN (ORL) 
16-34 
White River, Petersburg, IN (ORL) 16-34, 16-35 
White River, St. Paul, AR (SWL) 28-23 
White River, Tripp County Road, SD (MRO) 26-24 
White River, Winner, SD (MRO) 26-26 
Whitebird Creek, ID (NPW) 39-17 
Whitefish Point Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 
Whitesburg, KY (North Fork, Kentucky River) (ORL) 
16-33 
Whitewater River and Tributaries, IN & OH (ORL) 
16-24 
Whitewater River Basin Floodwarning System, San 
Bernardino, CA (SPL) 33-11, 33-21, 33-35 
Whitewater River, CA (SPL) 33-39 
Whitewater River, Levee Road, near Brookville, IN 
(ORL) 16-34 
Whitewater Treatment Plant, Great Miami River, Ross, 
OH (ORL) 16-34 
Whitings Creek, VA (NAO) 5-6, 5-10, 5-14, 5-17 
Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ (SPL) 33-11, 
33-20, 33-34 
Whitmanville Lake, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-65 
Whitney Lake, TX (SWF) 30-13, 30-18, 30-21 
Whitney Point Lake, NY (NAB) 4-20, 4-30 
Whitney Point Village, NY (NAB) 4-20, 4-30 
Whittier, AK (NPA) 40-17 
Whorton's Bend Road, Etowah County, AL (SAM) 
10-50 
Wichita and Valley Center LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 
29-28 
Wichita Falls, TX, Plum Creek (SWT) 29-28 
Wichita, KS (SWT) 29-30 
Wickford Harbor, RI (NED) 1-52, 1-61 
Wicomico River, MD (NAB) 4-11, 4-27, 4-36 
Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO 
(LSM) 14-17 
Wiggle Creek, Homer, NE (MRO) 26-26 
Wilbur D. Mills Lock and Dam (No. 2) (SWL) 28-24 
Wilcox, PA (ORP) 18-24 
Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers (NCS) 24-30, 24-32 
Wild Rice River, Hendrum/Lee, MN (NCS) 24-19, 
24-24 
Wild Rice River, Lake Ida, MN (NCS) 24-32 
Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN 
(NCS) 24-27 
Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA, CA (SPK) 35-22, 
35-31 
Wildcat Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 
Wildcat Creek, Howard County, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Wildcat Creek, Kokomo, IN (ORL) 16-35 
Wilders, KY (ORL) 16-30 
Wiley Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA (NAB) 4-38 
Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR (NPP) 37-41 
Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, 
OR (NPP) 37-38 
Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, 
OR (uncompleted portion) (NPP) 37-41 
Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR (NPP) 37-10, 
37-27, 37-35, 37-41, 37-43 
Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR (NPP) 
37-17, 37-29, 37-36 
Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging 
(NPP) 37-40 
Willamette River, OR (NPP) 37-42 
Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA 
(NPS) 38-7, 38-17, 38-23 
Willapa River at Raymond, WA (NPS) 38-29 
William H. Harsha Lake, OH (ORL) 16-12, 16-17, 
16-31 
William L. Springer Lake, Decatur, IL (NCR) 23-14 
Williams Delight Basin, St. Croix, VI (SAJ) 9-63 
Williamson, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 
Williamsport, AK (NPA) 40-17 
Williamsport, PA (NAB) 4-38 
Williamstown, WV (ORH) 17-22 
Williamsville Reservoir, VT (NED) 1-59 
Williston, ND Water Intake (MRO) 26-22 
Willoughby Channel, VA (NAO) 5-8, 5-14, 5-19, 5-22 
Willow Creek, CA (SPK) 35-44 
Willow Creek, ID (NPW) 39-16 
Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR (NPP) 37-17, 
37-29, 37-36 
Willow Creek Lake, OR (NPW) 39-16 
Willow Creek Unit (NPW) 39-17 
Wilmington Harbor, DE (NAP) 3-10, 3-20, 3-26 
Wilmington Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-20 
Wilmington Harbor, NC, Passing Lane (SAW) 6-32 
Wilmington Harbor, NC, Turns and Bends (SAW) 6-32 
Wilmington Harbor Widening and Deepening, NC 
(SAW) 6-31 
Wilmington Ice Control Demonstration (NCC) 22-23 
I-74

Wilmore, PA (ORP) 18-22 
Wilson Branch, SC (SAN) 7-24 
Wilson Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-21 
Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS (MRK) 27-7, 27-13, 
27-17, 27-22 
Wilson Point Harbor, CT (NED) 1-52 
Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Winfield L&D (ORH) 17-12 
Winfield LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-30 
Winnipesaukee Lake, NH (NED) 1-52 
Winona Harbors, MN 25-7 
Winona, MN (NCS) 24-27 
Winooski River, VT (NAN) 2-30 
Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little 
Colorado River Basin, AZ (SPL) 33-34 
Winsor Park, Las Vegas, NV (SPL) 33-33 
Winsted, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-63 
Winter Harbor ME (NED) 1-52 
Winter Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-17 
Winthrop Beach, MA (NED) 1-54 
Winthrop Beach, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 
1-59 
Winthrop Harbor, MA (NED) 1-52, 1-60 
Wisconsin River, WI (NCS) 24-25 
Wishart Point Channel, VA (NAO) 5-17 
Wister Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 
Wister Lake, OK (SWT) 29-11, 29-20, 29-24, 29-27 
Withlacoochee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 
Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS (SAM) 10-49, 10-54 
Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-19 
Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland, Ohio River 
Basin, KY (ORN) 15-7, 15-10 
Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, 
MS (SAM) 10-50 
Wolf Creek, LaPorte City, IA (NCR) 23-16 
Wolf Creek, Lawton, OK (SWT) 29-28 
Wolf Creek, U.S. Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss 
County, MS (SAM) 10-50 
Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN (LMM) 13-4 
Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford, ME 
(NED) 1-13, 1-36, 1-49 
Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 
14-12, 14-16 
Wood River, Grand Island, NE (MRO) 26-23 
Woodbridge Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-28 
Woodbury Creek. NJ (NAP) 3-27 
Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 
18-11, 18-15, 18-21, 18-28 
Woodlands, WV (ORP) 18-24 
Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT (NED) 1-15, 1-37, 
1-50 
Woods Hole Channel, MA (NED) 1-52 
Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR 
(NPP) 37-39 
Woodson Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-40 
Woonsocket, RI (NED) 1-56, 1-62 
Worcester Diversion, MA (NED) 1-56 
Worcester, MA (NED) 1-62 
Work Under Special Authorization (SWF) 30-12, 30-24 
Worthington, MN (NCR) 23-15 
Wrangell Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-6, 40-13, 40-16 
Wrangell Narrows, AK (NPA) 40-6, 40-15 
Wrangell Narrows Channel, AK (NPA) 40-7, 40-13 
Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 30-11, 
30-18, 30-21 
Wrights Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 
Wrightsville Beach, NC (SAW) 6-14, 6-22 
Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, VT (NAN) 
2-30 
Wynoochee Lake, WA (NPS) 38-11, 38-18, 38-24 
Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA (NPS) 38-29 
Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (NPS) 38-29 
Wyoming Valley, PA (NAB) 4-31 
Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising) (NAB) 4-23 
Y 
Yadkin River Basin, NC and SC (SAW) 6-15, 6-32 
Yakima (Yakima River), WA (NPS) 38-29 
Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA (NPS) 38-30 
Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River, near 
Cle Elum, WA (NPS) 38-29 
Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA (NPS) 38-29 
Yakima River, West Richland, WA (NPW) 39-16 
Yakima River, West Richland, WA (NPS) 38-29 
Yakima River, Yakima, WA (NPS) 38-29 
Yalobusha River, MS (LMK) 12-17 
Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR (NPP) 37-11, 37-27, 
37-35 
Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, OR (NPP) 
37-38 
Yaquina River, OR (NPP) 37-11, 37-27, 37-35 
Yaquina River, Port of Toledo, OR (NPP) 37-38 
1-75

Yatesville Lake, KY (ORH) 17-10, 17-15, 17-19 
Yazoo River, MS (LMK) 12-17 
Yellow Bend Port, AR (LMK) 12-17 
Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, GA (SAM) 10-50 
Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings, MT 
(MRO) 26-25 
Yellowstone River, Glendive (MRO) 26-25 
Yellowstone River, Highway 89 Bridge, MT (MRO) 
26-31 
Yellowstone River, Livingston, MT (MRO) 26-25 
Yellowstone River, MT (MRO) 26-31 
Yellowstone River, Route 11, Livingstone, MT (MRO) 
26-31 
Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT (MRO) 26-22, 
26-25 
Yellowstone River Water Plant, Livingston (MRO) 
26-25 
Yonkers, NY (NAN) 2-30 
York Harbor, ME (NED) 1-13, 1-36, 1-49 
York, Indian Rock Dam, PA (NAB) 4-23, 4-31, 4-39 
York River, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-17 
York Spit Channel (NAO) 5-3, 5-11 
Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and 
MD (ORP) 18-11, 18-15, 18-21, 18-28 
Youghiogheny River, PA and MD (Canalization) 
(ORP) 18-24 
Youngs and Claskine River, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR (NPP) 37-38 
Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 
Youngstown, OH (ORP) 18-22 
Z 
Zacate Creek Channel, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Zacate Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 
Zanesville, OH (ORH) 17-22 
Zintel Canyon Dam, WA (NWP) 39-4, 39-13, 39-17, 
39-21 
Zippel Bay Harbor, MN (NCS) 24-25 
Zipple Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN (NCS) 
24-4, 24-21 
Zumbro River at Genoa, MN (NCS) 24-27 
Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN (NCS) 
24-27, 24-31 
Zumbro River, MN (NCS) 24-27 
I-76

.* usaair I~3)